UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ý~~QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~

For the quarterly period ended~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

o~~TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~



☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-35039

BankUnited, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		27-0162450
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



14817 Oak Lane	Miami Lakes FL	FL	33016
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ~~(305)~~ (305) 569-2000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filerý	☒	Accelerated filer		~~Accelerated filer~~ o ☐
Non-accelerated filero	☐	Smaller reporting companyo	☐
		Emerging growth companyo	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o☐ Noý ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



Class	~~November 6, 2017~~Trading Symbol	Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value	~~106,820,503~~BKU	New York Stock Exchange

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant common stock, $0.01 par value was 95,067,938 as of August 2, 2019.

BANKUNITED, INC.

Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS

The following acronyms and terms may be used throughout this Form 10-Q, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes.



ACI		Loans acquired with evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination (Acquired Credit Impaired)
AFS		Available for sale
ALCO		Asset/Liability Committee
ALLL		Allowance for loan and lease losses
AOCI		Accumulated other comprehensive income
~~ARM~~		~~Adjustable rate mortgage~~
ASC		Accounting Standards Codification
ASU		Accounting Standards Update
BKU		BankUnited, Inc.
BankUnited		BankUnited, National Association
The Bank		BankUnited, National Association
Bridge		Bridge Funding Group, Inc.
Buyout loans		FHA and VA insured mortgages from third party servicers who have exercised their right to purchase these loans out of GNMA securitizations
CET1		Common Equity Tier 1 capital
CECL		Current expected credit ~~losses~~loss
CME		Chicago Mercantile Exchange
CLOs		Collateralized loan obligations
CMOs		Collateralized mortgage obligations
~~Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement~~		~~A commercial and other loans shared-loss agreement entered into with the FDIC in connection with the FSB Acquisition~~
Covered assets		Assets covered under the Loss Sharing Agreements
Covered loans		Loans covered under the Loss Sharing Agreements
DSCR		Debt Service Coverage Ratio
EPS		Earnings per common share
EVE		Economic value of equity
FASB		Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIA		Federal Deposit Insurance Act
FDIC		Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
~~FEMA~~		~~Federal Emergency Management Agency~~
FHLB		Federal Home Loan Bank
FHA loan		Loan guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration
FICO		Fair Isaac Corporation (credit score)
FRB		Federal Reserve Bank
FSB Acquisition		Acquisition of substantially all of the assets and assumption of all of the non-brokered deposits and substantially all of the other liabilities of BankUnited, FSB from the FDIC on May 21, 2009
FSB Loans		1-4 single family residential loans acquired in the FSB Acquisition that were formally covered by the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement
GAAP		U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
~~GDP~~GNMA		~~Gross Domestic Product~~Government National Mortgage Association
~~HAMP~~HTM		~~Home Affordable Modification Program~~Held to maturity
IPO		Initial public offering
ISDA		International Swaps and Derivatives Association
LIBOR		London InterBank Offered Rate
~~LIHTC~~		~~Low Income Housing Tax Credits~~
Loss Sharing Agreements		Two loss sharing agreements entered into with the FDIC in connection with the FSB Acquisition



LTV		Loan-to-value
MBS		Mortgage-backed securities
~~MSA~~		~~Metropolitan Statistical Area~~



~~MSRs~~		~~Mortgage servicing rights~~
~~New~~Non-Covered Loans		Loans ~~originated or purchased since~~other than those covered under the ~~FSB Acquisition~~Loss Sharing Agreements
~~Non-ACI~~OCI		~~Loans acquired without evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination~~
~~NSF~~		~~Non-sufficient funds~~
~~NYTLC~~		~~New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission~~Other comprehensive income
OCC		Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OREO		Other real estate owned
OTTI		Other-than-temporary impairment
PSU		Performance Share Unit
Pinnacle		Pinnacle Public Finance, Inc.
ROU Asset		Right-of-use Asset
RSU		Restricted Share Unit
SBA		U.S. Small Business Administration
SBF		Small Business Finance Unit
SEC		Securities and Exchange Commission
Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement		A single-family loan shared-loss agreement entered into with the FDIC in connection with the FSB Acquisition
SOFR		Secured Overnight Financing Rate
TDR		Troubled-debt restructuring
UPB		Unpaid principal balance
~~2014 Plan~~VA loan		~~2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan~~Loan guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

iii

~~Table of Contents~~

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks:
Non-interest bearing	$	34,883		$	40,260		$	10,152		$	9,392
Interest bearing	3,714			35,413			432,681			372,681
Interest bearing deposits at Federal Reserve Bank	254,004			372,640
Cash and cash equivalents	292,601			448,313			442,833			382,073
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value	6,893,472			6,073,584
Investment securities held to maturity	10,000			10,000
Investment securities (including securities recorded at fair value of $8,128,708 and $8,156,878)							8,138,708			8,166,878
Non-marketable equity securities	270,239			284,272			289,789			267,052
Loans held for sale	31,507			41,198			224,759			36,992
Loans (including covered loans of $537,976 and $614,042)	20,610,430			19,395,394
Loans (including covered loans of $201,376 at December 31, 2018)							22,591,849			21,977,008
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(158,573		)	(152,953		)	(112,141		)	(109,931		)
Loans, net	20,451,857			19,242,441			22,479,708			21,867,077
FDIC indemnification asset	349,617			515,933
Bank owned life insurance	248,876			239,736			274,603			263,340
Equipment under operating lease, net	588,207			539,914			707,680			702,354
Deferred tax asset, net	23,910			62,940
Goodwill and other intangible assets	77,857			78,047			77,696			77,718
Other assets	316,688			343,773			456,489			400,842
Total assets	$	29,554,831		$	27,880,151		$	33,092,265		$	32,164,326

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Demand deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	3,096,492		$	2,960,591		$	4,099,636		$	3,621,254
Interest bearing	1,828,809			1,523,064			1,831,441			1,771,465
Savings and money market	9,964,242			9,251,593			10,910,607			11,261,746
Time	6,333,701			5,755,642			7,080,716			6,819,758
Total deposits	21,223,244			19,490,890			23,922,400			23,474,223
Federal funds purchased							99,000			175,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	4,871,000			5,239,348			5,331,000			4,796,000
Notes and other borrowings	402,828			402,809			403,661			402,749
Other liabilities	434,270			328,675			468,294			392,521
Total liabilities	26,931,342			25,461,722			30,224,355			29,240,493

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 106,821,902 and 104,166,945 shares issued and outstanding	1,068			1,042
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 95,315,633 and 99,141,374 shares issued and outstanding							953			991
Paid-in capital	1,492,790			1,426,459			1,080,966			1,220,147
Retained earnings	1,077,042			949,681			1,803,360			1,697,822
Accumulated other comprehensive income	52,589			41,247
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)							(17,369		)	4,873
Total stockholders' equity	2,623,489			2,418,429			2,867,910			2,923,833
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	29,554,831		$	27,880,151		$	33,092,265		$	32,164,326

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2019			2018			2019		2018
Interest income:
Loans	$	253,815		$	227,233		$	739,586		$	662,439		$	249,364		$	288,264		$	489,996	$	562,264
Investment securities	51,851			39,712			141,624			109,963			72,796			56,092			149,141		106,077
Other	3,777			3,036			10,606			8,850			5,069			4,499			9,921		8,290
Total interest income	309,443			269,981			891,816			781,252			327,229			348,855			649,058		676,631
Interest expense:
Deposits	45,919			30,968			120,161			86,427			99,987			65,298			197,408		121,659
Borrowings	22,260			17,278			60,209			51,939			36,359			28,294			69,866		51,900
Total interest expense	68,179			48,246			180,370			138,366			136,346			93,592			267,274		173,559
Net interest income before provision for loan losses	241,264			221,735			711,446			642,886			190,883			255,263			381,784		503,072
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses (including $261, $(445), $2,693 and $(1,119) for covered loans)	37,854			24,408			63,573			42,449
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses (including $294 and $567 for covered loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018)													(2,747		)	8,995			7,534		12,142
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	203,410			197,327			647,873			600,437			193,630			246,268			374,250		490,930
Non-interest income:
Income from resolution of covered assets, net	6,400			8,883			22,066			26,426			—			4,238			—		7,555
Net gain (loss) on FDIC indemnification	(4,838		)	993			(14,174		)	(9,410		)
Service charges and fees	4,938			5,171			15,554			14,529
Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net (including $0, $(10,033), $(1,582) and $(14,895) related to covered loans)	2,447			(7,947		)	6,601			(7,360		)
Gain on investment securities available for sale, net	26,931			3,008			29,194			10,065
Net loss on FDIC indemnification													—			(1,400		)	—		(5,015		)
Deposit service charges and fees													4,290			3,510			8,120		6,997
Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net (including $(2,002) and $(298) related to covered loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018)													2,121			768			5,057		4,269
Gain on investment securities, net													4,116			2,142			9,901		2,506
Lease financing	13,287			11,188			40,067			32,762			17,005			17,492			34,191		31,594
Other non-interest income	4,161			3,779			12,055			10,118			7,805			5,223			14,323		12,053
Total non-interest income	53,326			25,075			111,363			77,130			35,337			31,973			71,592		59,959
Non-interest expense:
Employee compensation and benefits	58,327			55,162			178,386			166,374			57,251			65,537			122,484		132,573
Occupancy and equipment	18,829			18,867			56,689			57,199			13,991			14,241			27,157		28,544
Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset	45,225			38,957			135,351			116,711			—			44,250			—		84,597
Deposit insurance expense	5,764			4,943			16,827			12,866			5,027			4,623			9,068		9,435
Professional fees	2,748			3,884			12,573			10,119			6,937			2,657			14,808		5,532
Telecommunications and data processing	3,452			3,746			10,481			10,800
Technology and telecommunications													12,013			8,644			23,181		16,858
Depreciation of equipment under operating lease	8,905			6,855			25,655			20,004			11,489			9,476			23,301		18,792
Other non-interest expense	13,455			15,590			37,735			40,151			13,377			11,819			26,776		26,733
Total non-interest expense	156,705			148,004			473,697			434,224			120,085			161,247			246,775		323,064
Income before income taxes	100,031			74,398			285,539			243,343			108,882			116,994			199,067		227,825
Provision for income taxes	32,252			23,550			89,060			80,896			27,431			27,094			51,644		52,690
Net income	$	67,779		$	50,848		$	196,479		$	162,447		$	81,451		$	89,900		$	147,423	$	175,135
Earnings per common share, basic (see Note 2)	$	0.62		$	0.47		$	1.79		$	1.52
Earnings per common share, diluted (see Note 2)	$	0.62		$	0.47		$	1.79		$	1.50
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.21		$	0.21		$	0.63		$	0.63
Earnings per common share, basic													$	0.81		$	0.82		$	1.46	$	1.60
Earnings per common share, diluted													$	0.81		$	0.82		$	1.45	$	1.59

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2019			2018			2019			2018

Net income	$	67,779		$	50,848		$	196,479		$	162,447		$	81,451		$	89,900		$	147,423		$	175,135
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale:
Net unrealized holding gain arising during the period	8,557			3,216			32,826			53,490
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period													23,326			(13,106		)	44,943			(40,430		)
Reclassification adjustment for net securities gains realized in income	(16,293		)	(1,820		)	(17,662		)	(6,090		)	(2,877		)	(1,875		)	(6,050		)	(2,592		)
Net change in unrealized gains on securities available for sale	(7,736		)	1,396			15,164			47,400
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale													20,449			(14,981		)	38,893			(43,022		)
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	(170		)	5,055			(8,337		)	(34,948		)	(37,218		)	9,846			(57,893		)	29,639
Reclassification adjustment for net losses realized in income	1,210			2,264			4,515			7,896
Net change in unrealized losses on derivative instruments	1,040			7,319			(3,822		)	(27,052		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(6,696		)	8,715			11,342			20,348
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses realized in income													(1,241		)	(535		)	(3,242		)	155
Net change in unrealized loss on derivative instruments													(38,459		)	9,311			(61,135		)	29,794
Other comprehensive loss													(18,010		)	(5,670		)	(22,242		)	(13,228		)
Comprehensive income	$	61,083		$	59,563		$	207,821		$	182,795		$	63,441		$	84,230		$	125,181		$	161,907

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	196,479		$	162,447		$	147,423		$	175,135
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and accretion, net	(71,111		)	(90,360		)	(22,452		)	(69,157		)
Provision for loan losses	63,573			42,449			7,534			12,142
Income from resolution of covered assets, net	(22,066		)	(26,426		)	—			(7,555		)
Net loss on FDIC indemnification	14,174			9,410			—			5,015
(Gain) loss on sale of loans, net	(6,601		)	7,360
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance	(4,647		)	(2,973		)
Gain on investment securities available for sale, net	(29,194		)	(10,065		)
Gain on sale of loans, net							(5,057		)	(4,269		)
Gain on investment securities, net							(9,901		)	(2,506		)
Equity based compensation	14,337			13,418			11,251			12,272
Depreciation and amortization	45,204			38,971			35,555			31,391
Deferred income taxes	31,625			33,958			10,813			24,074
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale	126,778			121,968			209,854			86,118
Loans originated for sale, net of repayments	(109,588		)	(108,075		)	(51,024		)	(73,633		)
Other:
(Increase) decrease in other assets	15,743			(9,502		)
Decrease in other assets							31,897			15,625
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities	(33,546		)	44,708			(128,097		)	25,242
Net cash provided by operating activities	231,160			227,288			237,796			229,894

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities available for sale	(2,355,872		)	(2,224,174		)
Proceeds from repayments and calls of investment securities available for sale	861,618			457,610
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale	827,353			753,756
Purchase of investment securities							(2,160,715		)	(1,730,173		)
Proceeds from repayments and calls of investment securities							647,214			691,220
Proceeds from sale of investment securities							1,626,250			836,317
Purchase of non-marketable equity securities	(185,718		)	(178,813		)	(196,137		)	(166,813		)
Proceeds from redemption of non-marketable equity securities	199,751			115,388			173,400			154,063
Purchases of loans	(949,294		)	(936,882		)	(894,235		)	(604,278		)
Loan originations, repayments and resolutions, net	(192,075		)	(1,389,435		)	(51,014		)	152,848
Proceeds from sale of loans, net	98,404			120,537			9,560			115,560
Decrease in FDIC indemnification asset for claims filed	16,768			30,829
Acquisition of equipment under operating lease, net	(73,948		)	(52,399		)
Proceeds from sale of equipment under operating lease							8,986			49,892
Acquisition of equipment under operating lease							(37,122		)	(56,132		)
Other investing activities	(31,718		)	(19,577		)	(24,950		)	(16,404		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,784,731		)	(3,323,160		)	(898,763		)	(573,900		)
				(Continued)						(Continued)

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED (Continued)

(In thousands)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2019			2018
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	1,732,354			1,897,808			448,177			299,471
Net decrease in federal funds purchased							(76,000		)	—
Additions to Federal Home Loan Bank advances	3,921,000			3,360,000			2,456,000			2,201,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(4,290,000		)	(2,150,000		)	(1,921,000		)	(1,901,000		)
Dividends paid	(68,583		)	(67,342		)	(42,937		)	(45,996		)
Exercise of stock options	61,519			222
Repurchase of common stock							(142,065		)	(54,399		)
Other financing activities	41,569			49,638			(448		)	29,604
Net cash provided by financing activities	1,397,859			3,090,326			721,727			528,680
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(155,712		)	(5,546		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents							60,760			184,674
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	448,313			267,500			382,073			194,582
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	292,601		$	261,954		$	442,833		$	379,256

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	169,759		$	132,398		$	258,561		$	171,379
Income taxes paid, net	$	46,320		$	8,168
Income taxes (refunded) paid, net							$	(4,350	)	$	18,677

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned and other repossessed assets	$	6,738		$	11,679		$	2,817		$	7,574
Transfers from loans to loans held for sale							$	342,310		$	22,094
Dividends declared, not paid	$	23,045		$	22,482		$	20,621		$	22,916
Unsettled purchases of investment securities available for sale	$	107,500		$	—
Unsettled purchases of investment securities							$	21,396		$	272,500

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except share data)



	Common Shares Outstanding		Common Stock			Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at March 31, 2019	98,404,303		$	984		$	1,179,235		$	1,742,530		$	641		$	2,923,390
Comprehensive income	—		—			—			81,451			(18,010		)	63,441
Dividends ($0.21 per common share)	—		—			—			(20,621		)	—			(20,621		)
Equity based compensation	18,383		—			3,967			—			—			3,967
Forfeiture of unvested shares	(95,061	)	(1		)	(175		)	—			—			(176		)
Repurchase of common stock	(3,011,992	)	(30		)	(102,061		)	—			—			(102,091		)
Balance at June 30, 2019	95,315,633		$	953		$	1,080,966		$	1,803,360		$	(17,369	)	$	2,867,910

Balance at March 31, 2018	106,160,751		$	1,061		$	1,450,107		$	1,525,174		$	56,330		$	3,032,672
Comprehensive income	—		—			—			89,900			(5,670		)	84,230
Dividends ($0.21 per common share)	—		—			—			(22,917		)	—			(22,917		)
Equity based compensation	14,380		—			4,958			—			—			4,958
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations	(40,186	)	—			(378		)	—			—			(378		)
Exercise of stock options	251,189		2			6,633			—			—			6,635
Repurchase of common stock	(145,018	)	(1		)	(5,766		)	—			—			(5,767		)
Balance at June 30, 2018	106,241,116		$	1,062		$	1,455,554		$	1,592,157		$	50,660		$	3,099,433


	Common Shares Outstanding		Common Stock			Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Stockholders’ Equity			Common Shares Outstanding		Common Stock			Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016	104,166,945		$	1,042		$	1,426,459		$	949,681		$	41,247	$	2,418,429
Balance at December 31, 2018																	99,141,374		$	991		$	1,220,147		$	1,697,822		$	4,873		$	2,923,833
Comprehensive income	—		—			—			196,479			11,342		207,821			—		—			—			147,423			(22,242		)	125,181
Dividends	—		—			—			(69,118		)	—		(69,118		)
Dividends ($0.42 per common share)																	—		—			—			(41,885		)	—			(41,885		)
Equity based compensation	618,306		6			12,103			—			—		12,109			582,353		6			9,050			—			—			9,056
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations	(267,457	)	(3		)	(7,268		)	—			—		(7,271		)	(286,927	)	(3		)	(6,251		)	—			—			(6,254		)
Exercise of stock options	2,304,108		23			61,496			—			—		61,519			3,910		—			44			—			—			44
Balance at September 30, 2017	106,821,902		$	1,068		$	1,492,790		$	1,077,042		$	52,589	$	2,623,489
Repurchase of common stock																	(4,125,077	)	(41		)	(142,024		)	—			—			(142,065		)
Balance at June 30, 2019																	95,315,633		$	953		$	1,080,966		$	1,803,360		$	(17,369	)	$	2,867,910

Balance at December 31, 2015	103,626,255		$	1,036		$	1,406,786		$	813,894		$	22,182	$	2,243,898
Balance at December 31, 2017																	106,848,185		$	1,068		$	1,498,227		$	1,471,781		$	54,986		$	3,026,062
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standards																	—		—			—			(8,902		)	8,902			—
Comprehensive income	—		—			—			162,447			20,348		182,795			—		—			—			175,135			(13,228		)	161,907
Dividends	—		—			—			(67,444		)	—		(67,444		)
Dividends ($0.42 per common share)																	—		—			—			(45,857		)	—			(45,857		)
Equity based compensation	644,888		6			13,250			—			—		13,256			654,420		6			10,336			—			—			10,342
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations	(139,718	)	(1		)	(483		)	—			—		(484		)	(207,720	)	(2		)	(6,347		)	—			—			(6,349		)
Exercise of stock options	10,000		—			222			—			—		222			291,689		3			7,724			—			—			7,727
Tax benefits from dividend equivalents and equity based compensation	—		—			847			—			—		847
Balance at September 30, 2016	104,141,425		$	1,041		$	1,420,622		$	908,897		$	42,530	$	2,373,090
Repurchase of common stock																	(1,345,458	)	(13		)	(54,386		)	—			—			(54,399		)
Balance at June 30, 2018																	106,241,116		$	1,062		$	1,455,554		$	1,592,157		$	50,660		$	3,099,433

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BankUnited, Inc. is a national bank holding company with one wholly-owned subsidiary, BankUnited, collectively, the Company. BankUnited, a national banking association headquartered in Miami Lakes, Florida, provides a full range of banking and related services to individual and corporate customers through 9080 banking centers located in 1514 Florida counties and 65 banking centers located in the New York metropolitan area at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The Bank also offers certain commercial lending and deposit products through national platforms.

In connection with the FSB Acquisition, BankUnited entered into two loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. The Loss Sharing Agreements consist of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement. Assets covered by the Loss Sharing Agreements are referred to as covered assets or, in certain cases, covered loans. The Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement provides for FDIC loss sharing and the Bank’s reimbursement for recoveries to the FDIC through May 21, 2019 for single family residential loans and OREO. Loss sharing under the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement terminated on May 21, 2014. The Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement continued to provide for the Bank’s reimbursement of recoveries to the FDIC through June 30, 2017 for all other covered assets, including commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and consumer loans, certain investment securities and commercial OREO. Pursuant to the terms of the Loss Sharing Agreements, the covered assets are subject to a stated loss threshold whereby the FDIC will reimburse BankUnited for 80% of losses related to the covered assets up to $4.0 billion and 95% of losses in excess of this amount, beginning with the first dollar of loss incurred.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Accordingly, ~~they~~these do not include all of the information and footnotes required for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in BKU’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2018 filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods.

Certain amounts presented for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Accounting Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Significant estimates include the ALLL ~~the amount and timing of expected cash flows from covered assets and the FDIC indemnification asset,~~ and the fair values of investment securities and other financial instruments. ~~Management has used information provided by third party valuation specialists to assist in the determination of the fair values of investment securities.~~

New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019

ASU No. ~~2016-09,~~ ~~Compensation - Stock Compensation~~2016-02, Leases (Topic ~~718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting~~842). The amendments in this ASU, simplified several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2017. The amendment requiring the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies as income tax benefit or expense in the income statement as opposed to being recognized as additional paid-in-capital was applied prospectively and resulted in the recognition of $0.3 million and $3.2 million in excess tax benefits in the consolidated statement of income line item "Provision for income taxes" for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, increasing net income by the same amount in each period. The adoption had no impact on basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and increased basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 and $0.03, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The Company retrospectively adopted the amendments requiring the classification of excess tax benefits and deficienciesalong with other income tax cash flows as operating activities and cash paid when directly withholding shares as financing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows; the impact was not material. The Company elected to continue its practice of estimating the number of awards expected to vest in determining the amount of compensation cost to be recognized related to share based payment transactions.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

~~ASU No. 2017-08,~~ ~~Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.~~ The amendments in this ASU require certain premiums on callable debt securities to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amortization period for callable debt securities purchased as a discount will not be impacted. The Company early-adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2017 with no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~ASU No. 2016-06,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments.~~ The amendments in this ASU clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. A company performing the assessment under these amendments is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with a four-step decision sequence, without also considering whether the contingency is related to interest rates or credit risks. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2017 with no impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~ASU No. 2017-04,~~ ~~Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,~~ an amendment to simplify the subsequent quantitative measurement of goodwill by eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. As amended, an entity recognizes an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative test for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The Company early adopted this ASU in the third quarter of 2017, concurrent with performance of its annual goodwill impairment test, ~~with no impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows~~.

~~ASU No. 2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)~~: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness after initial qualification. For qualifying cash flow and net investment hedges, this means that the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness will be recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI), and amounts deferred in OCI will be reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line item that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item when the hedged item affects earnings. The Company will have until the end of the first quarter in which a hedge is designated to perform an initial assessment of a hedge’s effectiveness. The new guidance also permits a qualitative effectiveness assessment for certain hedges instead of a quantitative test, such as a regression analysis, if the company can reasonably support an expectation of high effectiveness throughout the term of the hedge. In addition, in order to better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships, the ASU allows for more hedging strategies to be eligible for hedge accounting. From a disclosure standpoint, to help users of the financial statements better understand the effects of hedge accounting, the guidance requires revised tabular disclosures that focus on the effect of hedge accounting by income statement line, and eliminates today’s requirement to disclose hedge ineffectiveness because this amount is no longer separately measured. The Company early adopted this ASU during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 with no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),~~ ~~which will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605,~~ ~~Revenue Recognition~~, and most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in this update affect any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of non-financial assets unless those contracts, including leases and insurance contracts, are within the scope of other standards. The amendments establish a core principle requiring the recognition of revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount reflecting the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for such goods or services. The amendments also require expanded disclosures concerning the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Financial instruments and lease contracts are generally outside the scope of the ASU as are revenues that are in the scope of ASC 860 "Transfers and Servicing", ASC 460 "Guarantees" and ASC 815 "Derivatives and Hedging". The FASB has issued subsequent ASUs issued to clarify certain ~~aspects~~provisions of ASU 2014-09, without changing the core principle of the guidance and to defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to annual periods and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Although management has not finalized its evaluation of the impact of adoption of this ASU, substantially all of the Company's revenues have historically been, and are expected to continue to be, generated from activities that are outside the scope of the ASU. Therefore, management does not expect adoption to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Service charges on deposit accounts, which totaled approximately $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, is the most significant category of revenue identified as within the scope of the ASU; management does not expect the amount and timing of recognition of such revenue to be materially impacted by adoption, which management expects to apply using the modified retrospective approach, whereby the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments is recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at the date of adoption.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,~~ ~~Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.~~ The amendments in the ASU that are expected to be most applicable to the Company (1) eliminate the available for sale classification for equity securities and require investments in equity securities (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, provided that equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values may be re-measured at fair value upon occurrence of an observable price change or recognition of impairment, (2) eliminate the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, and (3) require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. The amendments also clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for sale securities in combination with the entity's other deferred tax assets, which is consistent with the Company's current practice. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and will be adopted by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet, except for amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values, which will be applied prospectively. Although management has not finalized its evaluation of the impact of adoption of this ASU, adoption is not expected to have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or cash flows, other than a cumulative effect adjustment to reclassify any unrealized gains or losses related to equity securities from AOCI to retained earnings. The carrying value of equity investments for which fair value changes will be recognized in earnings after adoption totaled $71 million and had unrealized gains of $10.0 million at September 30, 2017. Adoption of the ASU will impact the Company's disclosures about the fair value of certain financial instruments.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842).~~ ~~The amendments in this ASU~~Topic 842, require a lessee to recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for leases with terms longer than one year. Accounting applied by lessors iswas largely unchanged by this ASU. The ASU also requires both qualitative and quantitative disclosures that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The amendments in this ASU ~~are~~were effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted; however, the Company does not intend to early adopt this ASU. Lessees and lessors are required to apply the provisions of the ASU at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Management has not completed its evaluation of theThe most significant impact of adoption ~~of this ASU and is not currently able to reasonably estimate the impact of adoption on the consolidated financial statements; however, the most significant impact is expected to be~~was the recognition, as lessee, of new right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the ~~consolidated balance sheet~~Consolidated Balance Sheet for real estate leases ~~currently~~ classified as operating leases. Under a package of practical expedients that the Company elected, as lessee and lessor, the Company did not have to (i) re-assess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, (ii) re-assess the classification of expired or existing leases, (iii) re-evaluate initial direct costs for existing leases or (iv) separate lease components of certain contracts from non-lease components. The Company also elected the transition method that allows entities the option of applying the provisions of the ASU at the effective date without adjusting the comparative periods presented. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method. The Company recognized a lease liability and related right of use asset of approximately $104 million and $95 million, respectively, upon adoption on January 1, 2019.

ASU No. 2018-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. The ASU added the OIS rate based on SOFR as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. The ASU was effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2019 with no impact at adoption to its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326); Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ~~The~~ This ASU, along with subsequent ASUs issued to clarify certain of its provisions, introduces new guidance which makes substantive changes to the accounting for credit losses. The ASU introduces the CECL

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

model which applies to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, as well as certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes loans, loan commitments, standby letters of credit, net investments in leases recognized by a lessor and ~~held-to-maturity~~HTM debt securities. The CECL model requires an entity to estimate credit losses expected over the life of an exposure, considering information about historical events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable ~~forecasts.~~forecasts, and is generally expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The ASU also modifies certain provisions of the current OTTI model for ~~available for sale~~AFS debt ~~securities requiring an estimate of expected credit losses only when the fair value of an available for sale debt security is below its amortized cost.~~securities. Credit losses on ~~available for sale~~AFS debt securities will be limited to the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and its fair ~~value.~~value, and will be recognized through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a direct reduction in amortized cost basis. The ASU also provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with more than insignificant credit deterioration since their origination. The ASU requires expanded disclosures including, but not limited to, (i) information about the methods and assumptions used to estimate expected credit losses, including changes in the factors that influenced management's estimate and the reasons for those changes, (ii) for financing receivables and net investment in leases measured at amortized cost, further disaggregation of information about the credit quality of those assets and (iii) a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses for AFS and HTM securities. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted; however, the Company does not intend to early adopt this ASU. Management ~~has not yet completed its evaluation~~is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements, processes and controls and is not currently able to reasonably estimate the impact of adoption on the Company's consolidated financial ~~statements;~~position, results of operations or cash flows; however, adoption ~~is likely to~~will lead to significant changes in accounting policies related to, and the methods employed in estimating, the ALLL. It is possible that the impact will be material to the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations. To date, the Company has completed a gap analysis, adopted and is in the process of executing a detailed implementation plan, established a formal governance structure, selected and implemented credit loss models for key portfolio segments, chosen loss estimation methodologies for key portfolio segments, implemented a software solution to serve as its CECL platform, and initiated a "parallel run" of the CECL estimation process.

Leases

The Company determines whether a contract is or contains a lease at inception. For leases with terms greater than twelve months under which the Company is lessee, ROU assets and lease liabilities are recorded at the commencement date. Lease liabilities are initially recorded based on the present value of future lease payments over the lease term. ROU assets are initially recorded at the amount of the associated lease liabilities plus prepaid lease payments and initial direct costs, less any lease incentives received. The cost of short term leases is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease term. The lease term includes options to extend if the exercise of those options is reasonably certain and includes termination options if there is reasonable certainty the options will not be exercised. Lease payments are discounted using the Company's FHLB borrowing rate for borrowings of a similar term unless an implicit rate is defined in the contract or is determinable, which is generally not the case. Leases are classified as financing or operating leases at commencement; generally, leases are classified as finance leases when effective control of the underlying asset is transferred. The substantial majority of leases under which the Company is lessee are classified as operating leases. For operating leases, lease cost is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income on a straight line basis over the lease terms. For finance leases, interest expense on lease liabilities is recognized on the effective interest method and amortization of ROU assets is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease terms. Variable lease costs are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those costs is incurred. The Company has elected not to separate lease from non-lease components of its lease contracts.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.~~ The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on eight specific cash flow classification issues where there has been diversity in practice. The guidance in the ASU that is expected to be most applicable to the Company requires: (1) cash payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs to be classified as cash outflows for financing activities, (2) proceeds from settlement of insurance claims to be classified on the basis of the nature of the loss and (3) cash proceeds from settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies to be classified as cash flows from investing activities. Cash payments for premiums on bank-owned life insurance may be classified as cash flows for investing activities, operating activities or a combination thereof. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and will be applied retrospectively to each period presented. The provisions of this ASU are generally consistent with the Company's current practice and adoption is not expected to materially impact the Company's consolidated cash flows.

Note 2 Earnings Per Common Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is presented below for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
c	2019			2018			2019			2018
Basic earnings per common share:
Numerator:
Net income	$	81,451		$	89,900		$	147,423		$	175,135
Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities	(3,382		)	(3,463		)	(6,074		)	(6,676		)
Income allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share	$	78,069		$	86,437		$	141,349		$	168,459
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	97,451,019			106,170,834			98,150,014			106,347,378
Less average unvested stock awards	(1,174,339		)	(1,222,436		)	(1,173,137		)	(1,165,750		)
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per common share	96,276,680			104,948,398			96,976,877			105,181,628
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.81		$	0.82		$	1.46		$	1.60
Diluted earnings per common share:
Numerator:
Income allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share	$	78,069		$	86,437		$	141,349		$	168,459
Adjustment for earnings reallocated from participating securities	9			12			13			23
Income used in calculating diluted earnings per common share	$	78,078		$	86,449		$	141,362		$	168,482
Denominator:
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per common share	96,276,680			104,948,398			96,976,877			105,181,628
Dilutive effect of stock options and certain share-based awards	345,899			522,997			312,821			519,598
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share	96,622,579			105,471,395			97,289,698			105,701,226
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.81		$	0.82		$	1.45		$	1.59

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
c 2017 2016 2017
2016
Basic earnings per common share:

Numerator:

Net income $ 67,779
$ 50,848
$ 196,479
$ 162,447
Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities (2,525 ) (2,031 ) (7,331 ) (6,522 )
Income allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share $ 65,254
$ 48,817
$ 189,148
$ 155,925
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding 106,809,381
104,153,018
106,488,396
104,077,932
Less average unvested stock awards (1,101,485 ) (1,150,268 ) (1,102,381 ) (1,165,509 )
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per common share 105,707,896
103,002,750
105,386,015
102,912,423
Basic earnings per common share $ 0.62
$ 0.47
$ 1.79
$ 1.52
Diluted earnings per common share:
Numerator:
Income allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share $ 65,254
$ 48,817
$ 189,148
$ 155,925
Adjustment for earnings reallocated from participating securities 6
(81 ) 21
(264 )
Income used in calculating diluted earnings per common share $ 65,260
$ 48,736
$ 189,169
$ 155,661
Denominator:

Weighted average shares for basic earnings per common share 105,707,896
103,002,750
105,386,015
102,912,423
Dilutive effect of stock options and executive share-based awards 365,286
558,304
479,459
699,977
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share 106,073,182
103,561,054
105,865,474
103,612,400
Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.62
$ 0.47
$ 1.79
$ 1.50

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Included in participating securities above are unvested shares and 3,023,314 dividend equivalent rights outstanding at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 that were issued in conjunction with the IPO of the Company's common stock. These dividend equivalent rights expire in 2021 and participate in dividends on a one-for-one basis.

The following potentially dilutive securities were outstanding at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018 but excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the periods indicated because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,		Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016	2019	2018	2019	2018
Unvested shares and share units	1,111,300	1,296,848	1,111,300	1,296,848	1,119,641	1,644,336	1,119,641	1,644,336
Stock options and warrants	1,850,279	1,851,376	1,850,279	1,851,376	—	1,850,279	—	1,850,279

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

Note 3 Investment Securities

Investment securities include investment securities available for sale, marketable equity securities, and investment securities held to maturity. The investment securities portfolio consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017									June 30, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾
			Gains		Losses							Gains		Losses
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	24,969	$	—	$	(12	)	$	24,957	$	49,992	$	221	$	—		$	50,213
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	2,332,616		16,762		(691		)	2,348,687		2,222,327		14,446		(8,978		)	2,227,795
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	139,966		1,067		(1,813		)	139,220		378,167		4,057		(1,120		)	381,104
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	507,381		20,812		(335		)	527,858		1,374,008		22,256		(1,082		)	1,395,182
Private label commercial MBS	1,140,465		14,646		(1,510		)	1,153,601		1,549,733		8,462		(242		)	1,557,953
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	566,635		6,425		(112		)	572,948		387,104		5,392		(190		)	392,306
Collateralized loan obligations	695,414		4,905		—			700,319		1,205,295		766		(7,779		)	1,198,282
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	80,255		2,382		—			82,637		155,542		2,321		(46		)	157,817
Preferred stocks	60,716		10,000		—			70,716
State and municipal obligations	666,013		14,370		(3,368		)	677,015		265,856		13,471		—			279,327
SBA securities	572,540		14,152		(17		)	586,675		418,494		5,631		(2,352		)	421,773
Other debt securities	4,056		4,783		—			8,839		1,395		3,386		—			4,781
	$	6,791,026	$	110,304	$	(7,858	)	$	6,893,472	8,007,913		$	80,409	$	(21,789	)	8,066,533
Investment securities held to maturity										10,000							10,000
										$	8,017,913						8,076,533
Marketable equity securities																	62,175
																	$	8,138,708

1110

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019


	December 31, 2016									December 31, 2018
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾
			Gains		Losses							Gains		Losses
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	4,999	$	6	$	—		$	5,005	$	39,885	$	2	$	(14	)	$	39,873
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	1,513,028		15,922		(1,708		)	1,527,242		1,885,302		16,580		(4,408		)	1,897,474
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	126,754		670		(2,838		)	124,586		374,569		1,293		(1,075		)	374,787
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	334,167		42,939		(2,008		)	375,098		1,539,058		10,138		(14,998		)	1,534,198
Private label commercial MBS	1,180,386		9,623		(2,385		)	1,187,624		1,486,835		5,021		(6,140		)	1,485,716
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	858,339		4,748		(1,836		)	861,251		406,310		266		(4,118		)	402,458
Collateralized loan obligations	487,678		868		(1,250		)	487,296		1,239,355		1,060		(5,217		)	1,235,198
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	187,660		2,002		(2,926		)	186,736		204,372		1,031		(1,336		)	204,067
Preferred stocks	76,180		12,027		(4		)	88,203
State and municipal obligations	705,884		3,711		(11,049		)	698,546		398,810		3,684		(4,065		)	398,429
SBA securities	517,129		7,198		(421		)	523,906		514,765		6,502		(1,954		)	519,313
Other debt securities	3,999		4,092		—			8,091		1,393		3,453		—			4,846
	$	5,996,203	$	103,806	$	(26,425	)	$	6,073,584	8,090,654		$	49,030	$	(43,325	)	8,096,359
Investment securities held to maturity										10,000							10,000
										$	8,100,654						8,106,359
Marketable equity securities																	60,519
																	$	8,166,878


(1)	At fair value except for securities held to maturity.

Investment securities held to maturity at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016~~2018 consisted of one State of Israel bond ~~with a carrying value of $10 million. Fair value approximated carrying value at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The bond matures~~maturing in 2024.

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale, adjusted for anticipated prepayments ~~of mortgage-backed and other pass-through securities,~~when applicable, were as follows (in thousands):

Amortized Cost Fair Value
Due in one year or less $ 684,986
$ 697,034
Due after one year through five years 3,363,698
3,406,609
Due after five years through ten years 2,252,239
2,282,220
Due after ten years 429,387
436,893
Preferred stocks with no stated maturity 60,716
70,716
$ 6,791,026
$ 6,893,472

Based on the Company’s assumptions, the estimated weighted average life of the investment portfolio as of September 30, 2017 was 4.9 years. The effective duration of the investment portfolio as of September 30, 2017 was 1.7 years. The model results are based on assumptions that may differ from actual results.



	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	767,598	$	775,378
Due after one year through five years	4,350,779		4,371,075
Due after five years through ten years	2,457,216		2,480,114
Due after ten years	432,320		439,966
	$	8,007,913	$	8,066,533

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral for FHLB advances, public deposits, interest rate swaps and to secure borrowing capacity at the FRB totaled ~~$2.5~~$2.2 billion and ~~$1.8~~$2.1 billion at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

1211

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

The following table provides information about gains and losses on investment securities ~~available for sale~~ for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale	$	850,527		$	569,387		$	1,626,250		$	836,317

Gross realized gains:
Investment securities available for sale	$	4,631		$	2,554		$	8,956		$	6,041
Gross realized losses:
Investment securities available for sale	(716		)	(4		)	(724		)	(2,514		)
Net realized gain	3,915			2,550			8,232			3,527

Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable equity securities recognized in earnings	201			(408		)	1,669			(1,021		)

Gain on investment securities, net	$	4,116		$	2,142		$	9,901		$	2,506

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale $ 399,430

$ 259,571
$ 827,353
$ 753,756

Gross realized gains $ 28,261
$ 3,471
$ 30,553
$ 10,528
Gross realized losses (1,330 ) —
(1,359 ) —
Net realized gain 26,931
3,471
29,194
10,528
OTTI —
(463 ) —
(463 )
Gain on investment securities available for sale, net $ 26,931
$ 3,008
$ 29,194
$ 10,065

The following tables present the aggregate fair value and the aggregate amount by which amortized cost exceeded fair value for investment securities available for sale in unrealized loss positions, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities had been in continuous unrealized loss positions at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017															June 30, 2019
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total					Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	24,957	$	(12	)	$	—	$	—		$	24,957	$	(12	)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	460,806		(425		)	9,544		(266		)	470,350		(691		)	$	919,284	$	(6,994	)	$	140,310	$	(1,984	)	$	1,059,594	$	(8,978	)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	55,152		(1,783		)	14,270		(30		)	69,422		(1,813		)	99,590		(1,083		)	6,477		(37		)	106,067		(1,120		)
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	72,557		(217		)	5,820		(118		)	78,377		(335		)	121,628		(180		)	204,205		(902		)	325,833		(1,082		)
Private label commercial MBS	124,664		(1,510		)	—		—			124,664		(1,510		)	100,262		(220		)	14,780		(22		)	115,042		(242		)
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	14,708		(112		)	—		—			14,708		(112		)	142,824		(148		)	22,946		(42		)	165,770		(190		)
State and municipal obligations	184,082		(3,368		)	—		—			184,082		(3,368		)
Collateralized loan obligations																623,797		(5,981		)	80,202		(1,798		)	703,999		(7,779		)
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities																39,505		(46		)	—		—			39,505		(46		)
SBA securities	—		—			18,229		(17		)	18,229		(17		)	62,857		(1,050		)	101,227		(1,302		)	164,084		(2,352		)
	$	936,926	$	(7,427	)	$	47,863	$	(431	)	$	984,789	$	(7,858	)	$	2,109,747	$	(15,702	)	$	570,147	$	(6,087	)	$	2,679,894	$	(21,789	)

1312

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019


	December 31, 2016															December 31, 2018
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total					Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities																$	14,921	$	(14	)	$	—	$	—		$	14,921	$	(14	)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	$	191,463	$	(628	)	$	112,391	$	(1,080	)	$	303,854	$	(1,708	)	450,666		(1,828		)	87,311		(2,580		)	537,977		(4,408		)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	89,437		(2,838		)	—		—			89,437		(2,838		)	146,096		(352		)	25,815		(723		)	171,911		(1,075		)
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	122,142		(1,680		)	8,074		(328		)	130,216		(2,008		)	759,921		(7,073		)	278,108		(7,925		)	1,038,029		(14,998		)
Private label commercial MBS	169,535		(2,370		)	24,985		(15		)	194,520		(2,385		)	742,092		(5,371		)	39,531		(769		)	781,623		(6,140		)
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	139,867		(842		)	176,057		(994		)	315,924		(1,836		)	234,305		(1,973		)	85,282		(2,145		)	319,587		(4,118		)
Collateralized loan obligations	69,598		(402		)	173,983		(848		)	243,581		(1,250		)	749,047		(5,217		)	—		—			749,047		(5,217		)
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	139,477		(2,926		)	—		—			139,477		(2,926		)	136,100		(1,336		)	—		—			136,100		(1,336		)
Preferred stocks	10,087		(4		)	—		—			10,087		(4		)
State and municipal obligations	448,180		(11,049		)	—		—			448,180		(11,049		)	208,971		(3,522		)	46,247		(543		)	255,218		(4,065		)
SBA securities	4,204		(13		)	20,076		(408		)	24,280		(421		)	215,975		(1,391		)	31,481		(563		)	247,456		(1,954		)
	$	1,383,990	$	(22,752	)	$	515,566	$	(3,673	)	$	1,899,556	$	(26,425	)	$	3,658,094	$	(28,077	)	$	593,775	$	(15,248	)	$	4,251,869	$	(43,325	)

The Company monitors its investment securities available for sale for OTTI on an individual security basis. No securities were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019 or 2018. The Company does not intend to sell securities that are in significant unrealized loss positions at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of the amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, 54~~2019, 126 securities were in unrealized loss positions. The amount of impairment related to 2048 of these securities was considered insignificant both individually and in the aggregate, totaling approximately ~~$237~~$422 thousand and no further analysis with respect to these securities was considered necessary. The basis for concluding that impairment of the remaining securities was not other-than-temporary is further described ~~below:~~below.

U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential~~MBS~~and commercialMBS

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, eight~~2019, thirty-six U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS and four U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS were in unrealized loss positions. ~~For five fixed rate~~Impairment of these securities ~~the impairment~~ was primarily attributable to ~~an increase~~increases in ~~medium and long-term~~ market interest rates subsequent to the date of ~~acquisition. For the remaining seven variable rate~~acquisition and for certain securities, ~~the amount of impairment was less than 1% of amortized cost.~~widening spreads. The timely payment of principal and interest on these securities is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. Government. Given the expectation of timely payment of principal and interest the impairments were considered to be temporary.

Private label residentialMBSandCMOs

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, five~~2019, eight private label residential MBS and CMOs were in unrealized loss positions, primarily as a result of an increase in medium and long-term market interest rates subsequent to acquisition. ~~The amount of impairment of each of the individual securities was less than 3% of amortized cost.~~ These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit and prepayment behavioral models that incorporate CUSIP level constant default rates, voluntary prepayment rates and loss severity and delinquency assumptions. The results of these assessments were not indicative of credit losses related to any of these securities as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Given ~~the limited severity of impairment and~~ the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal the impairments were considered to be temporary.

Private label commercialMBS

At June 30, 2019, three private label commercial MBS were in unrealized loss positions, primarily as a result of an increase in market interest rates since acquisition. These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit and prepayment behavioral

1413

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

~~Private label commercialMBS~~models incorporating assumptions consistent with the collateral characteristics of each security. The results of this analysis were not indicative of expected credit losses. Given the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal the impairments were considered to be temporary.

Single family rental real estate-backed securities

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, four private label commercial MBS~~2019, two single family rental real estate-backed securities were in unrealized loss positions. The ~~amount of impairment of each of the individual securities was less than 3% of amortized cost. The~~ unrealized losses were primarily ~~attributable~~due to increases in market interest rates since the purchase of the securities. Management's analysis of the credit characteristics, including loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios, and levels of subordination for each of the securities is not indicative of projected credit losses. Given the absence of projected credit losses the impairments were considered to be temporary.

Collateralized loan obligations:

At June 30, 2019, sixteen collateralized loan obligations were in unrealized loss positions, primarily due to widening credit spreads for this asset class. These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit and prepayment behavioral models incorporating assumptions consistent with the collateral characteristics of each security. The results of this analysis were not indicative of expected credit losses. Given the ~~limited severity of impairment and the~~ expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal, the impairments were considered to be temporary.

~~Single family rental real estate-backed~~Non-mortgage asset-backed securities

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, two single family rental real estate-backed~~2019, one non-mortgage asset-backed security was in an unrealized loss position, due primarily to increases in market interest rates subsequent to the date of acquisition. This security was assessed for OTTI using a credit and prepayment behavioral model incorporating assumptions consistent with the collateral characteristics of the security. The results of this analysis were not indicative of expected credit losses. Given the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal, the impairment was considered to be temporary.

SBA Securities

At June 30, 2019, eight SBA securities were in unrealized loss positions. These securities were purchased at a premium and the impairment was attributable primarily to increased prepayment speeds. The ~~unrealized losses were primarily due to increases in market~~timely payment of principal and interest rates since the purchase of the securities. The amount of impairment of each of the individual securities was less than 2% of amortized cost. Management's analysis of the credit characteristics, including loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios, and levels of subordination for each of theon these securities is ~~not indicative of projected credit losses.~~guaranteed by this U.S. Government agency. Given the ~~limited severity~~expectation of ~~impairment~~timely payment of principal and ~~the absence of projected credit losses,~~interest, the impairments were considered to be temporary.

~~State and municipal obligations~~

At September 30, 2017, 11 state and municipal obligations were in unrealized loss positions. The amount of impairment of each of the individual securities was less than 5% of amortized cost. All of the securities are rated investment grade by nationally recognized statistical ratings organizations. Management's evaluation of these securities for OTTI also encompassed the review of credit scores and analysis provided by a third party firm specializing in the analysis and credit review of municipal securities. Given the absence of expected credit losses and management's ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery, the impairments were considered to be temporary.

1514

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

Note 4 Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The Company segregates its loan portfolio between covered and non-covered loans. Non-covered loans include loans originated since the FSB acquisition and commercial and consumer loans acquired in the FSB Acquisition for which loss share coverage has terminated. Covered loans are further segregated between ACI loans and non-ACI loans.

Loans consisted of the following at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2017
				Covered Loans									Percent of Total		June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018
	Non-Covered Loans			ACI			Non-ACI			Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	3,958,205		$	470,300		$	28,589		$	4,457,094		21.7	%	$	4,830,943		21.4	%	$	4,606,828		21.0	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit	1,644			5,640			37,764			45,048			0.2	%
Other consumer loans	20,166			—			—			20,166			0.1	%
Government insured residential															354,731			1.6	%	265,701			1.2	%
Other															14,533			0.1	%	17,369			0.1	%
	3,980,015			475,940			66,353			4,522,308			22.0	%	5,200,207			23.1	%	4,889,898			22.3	%
Commercial:
Multi-family	3,358,801			—			—			3,358,801			16.3	%	2,381,346			10.6	%	2,583,331			11.8	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,183,275			—			—			4,183,275			20.4	%	4,945,017			21.9	%	4,700,188			21.4	%
Construction and land	271,994			—			—			271,994			1.3	%	237,222			1.1	%	227,134			1.0	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	1,959,464			—			—			1,959,464			9.5	%	2,080,578			9.2	%	2,122,381			9.7	%
Commercial and industrial	3,900,290			—			—			3,900,290			19.0	%	5,164,571			22.9	%	4,801,226			21.9	%
Commercial lending subsidiaries	2,374,193			—			—			2,374,193			11.5	%	2,531,767			11.2	%	2,608,834			11.9	%
	16,048,017			—			—			16,048,017			78.0	%	17,340,501			76.9	%	17,043,094			77.7	%
Total loans	20,028,032			475,940			66,353			20,570,325			100.0	%	22,540,708			100.0	%	21,932,992			100.0	%
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, net	44,422			—			(4,317		)	40,105					51,141					44,016
Loans including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs	20,072,454			475,940			62,036			20,610,430					22,591,849					21,977,008
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(153,725		)	(1,812		)	(3,036		)	(158,573		)			(112,141		)			(109,931		)
Loans, net	$	19,918,729		$	474,128		$	59,000		$	20,451,857				$	22,479,708				$	21,867,077

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company purchased 1-4 single family residential loans totaling $589 million, $894 million, $271 million and $604 million, respectively. Purchases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 included $151 million, $284 million, $72 million and $112 million, respectively, of government insured residential loans.

At June 30, 2019, the Company had pledged real estate loans with a carrying value of approximately $9.9 billion as security for FHLB advances.

1615

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

The following presents the Company's recorded investment in ACI loans, included in the table above, as of the dates indicated (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Residential	$	174,029	$	190,223
Commercial	17,544		17,925
	$	191,573	$	208,148

December 31, 2016

Covered Loans Percent of Total
Non-Covered Loans ACI Non-ACI Total
Residential and other consumer:

1-4 single family residential $ 3,422,425
$ 532,348
$ 36,675
$ 3,991,448
20.6 %
Home equity loans and lines of credit 1,120
3,894
47,629
52,643
0.3 %
Other consumer loans 24,365
—
—
24,365
0.1 %
3,447,910
536,242
84,304
4,068,456
21.0 %
Commercial:
Multi-family 3,824,973
—
—
3,824,973
19.8 %
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 3,739,235
—
—
3,739,235
19.3 %
Construction and land 311,436
—
—
311,436
1.6 %
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1,736,858
—
—
1,736,858
9.0 %
Commercial and industrial 3,391,614
—
—
3,391,614
17.5 %
Commercial lending subsidiaries 2,280,685
—
—
2,280,685
11.8 %
15,284,801
—
—
15,284,801
79.0 %
Total loans 18,732,711
536,242
84,304
19,353,257
100.0 %
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, net 48,641
—
(6,504 ) 42,137

Loans including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs 18,781,352
536,242
77,800
19,395,394

Allowance for loan and lease losses (150,853 ) —
(2,100 ) (152,953 )
Loans, net $ 18,630,499
$ 536,242
$ 75,700
$ 19,242,441

~~Included in non-covered loans above are $38 million and $47 million at September~~At June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016, respectively, of ACI commercial loans acquired in the FSB Acquisition.~~

Through two subsidiaries, the Bank provides commercial and municipal equipment and franchise financing utilizing both loan and lease structures. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the commercial lending subsidiaries portfolio included a net investment in direct financing leases of $680 million and $643 million, respectively.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company purchased 1-4 single family residential loans totaling $312 million, $949 million, $355 million and $937 million, respectively.

~~At September 30, 2017, the Company had pledged real estate loans with UPB of approximately $10.5 billion and recorded investment of approximately $9.9 billion as security for FHLB advances.~~

~~At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,~~2018, the UPB of ACI loans was ~~$1.2 billion~~$367 million and ~~$1.5 billion,~~$408 million, respectively. The accretable yield on ACI loans represents the amount by which undiscounted expected future cash flows exceed recorded investment. Changes in the accretable yield on ACI loans for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2018 were as follows (in thousands):



Balance at December 31, 2017	$	455,059
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference, net	128,499
Accretion	(369,915		)
Other changes, net ⁽¹⁾	78,204
Balance at December 31, 2018	291,847
Reclassifications to non-accretable difference, net	(429		)
Accretion	(33,103		)
Other changes, net ⁽¹⁾	(6,929		)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	251,386


(1)	Represents changes in cash flows expected to be collected due to the impact of changes in prepayment assumptions or changes in benchmark interest rates.

Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 902,565
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference 76,751
Accretion (303,931 )
Balance at December 31, 2016 675,385
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference 72,827
Accretion (226,251 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 521,961

1716

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

~~Covered loan sales~~

~~During the periods indicated, the Company sold covered residential loans to third parties on a non-recourse basis. The following table summarizes the impact of these transactions (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2017 2016
UPB of loans sold $ 61,406
$ 123,737
$ 176,958

Cash proceeds, net of transaction costs $ 37,047
$ 98,404
$ 120,537
Recorded investment in loans sold 47,080
99,986
135,432
Loss on sale of covered loans, net $ (10,033 ) $ (1,582 ) $ (14,895 )

Gain on FDIC indemnification, net $ 8,026
$ 1,266
$ 11,958

~~There was no sale of covered loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017.~~

Allowance for loan and lease losses

Activity in the ALLL is summarized as follows for the periods indicated ~~(in thousands)~~(thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Unallocated Total Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total
Beginning balance $ 13,550
$ 142,098
$ —
$ 155,648
$ 12,415
$ 123,303
$ 135,718
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses:
Covered loans 268
(7 ) —
261
(430 ) (15 ) (445 )
Non-covered loans 363
32,230
5,000
37,593
1,974
22,879
24,853
Total provision 631
32,223
5,000
37,854
1,544
22,864
24,408
Charge-offs:
Covered loans —
—
—
—
(247 ) —
(247 )
Non-covered loans —
(36,028 ) —
(36,028 ) —
(6,615 ) (6,615 )
Total charge-offs —
(36,028 ) —
(36,028 ) (247 ) (6,615 ) (6,862 )
Recoveries:
Covered loans 31
7
—
38
9
15
24
Non-covered loans 8
1,053
—
1,061
5
1,183
1,188
Total recoveries 39
1,060
—
1,099
14
1,198
1,212
Ending balance $ 14,220
$ 139,353
$ 5,000
$ 158,573
$ 13,726
$ 140,750
$ 154,476



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019								2018
	Residential and Other Consumer		Commercial			Total			Residential and Other Consumer			Commercial			Total
Beginning balance	$	10,952	$	103,751		$	114,703		$	10,832		$	126,644		$	137,476
Provision (recovery)	131		(2,878		)	(2,747		)	(280		)	9,275			8,995
Charge-offs	—		(1,711		)	(1,711		)	(222		)	(12,046		)	(12,268		)
Recoveries	153		1,743			1,896			8			760			768
Ending balance	$	11,236	$	100,905		$	112,141		$	10,338		$	124,633		$	134,971



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019								2018
	Residential and Other Consumer		Commercial			Total			Residential and Other Consumer			Commercial			Total
Beginning balance	$	10,788	$	99,143		$	109,931		$	10,720		$	134,075		$	144,795
Provision	281		7,253			7,534			94			12,048			12,142
Charge-offs	—		(7,844		)	(7,844		)	(504		)	(22,396		)	(22,900		)
Recoveries	167		2,353			2,520			28			906			934
Ending balance	$	11,236	$	100,905		$	112,141		$	10,338		$	124,633		$	134,971

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Unallocated Total Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total
Beginning balance $ 11,503
$ 141,450
$ —
$ 152,953
$ 16,211
$ 109,617
$ 125,828
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses:
Covered loans 2,738
(45 ) —
2,693
(1,074 ) (45 ) (1,119 )
Non-covered loans (52 ) 55,932
5,000
60,880
(420 ) 43,988
43,568
Total provision 2,686
55,887
5,000
63,573
(1,494 ) 43,943
42,449
Charge-offs:
Covered loans (55 ) —
—
(55 ) (1,086 ) —
(1,086 )
Non-covered loans —
(61,034 ) —
(61,034 ) —
(15,748 ) (15,748 )
Total charge-offs (55 ) (61,034 ) —
(61,089 ) (1,086 ) (15,748 ) (16,834 )
Recoveries:
Covered loans 65
45
—
110
77
45
122
Non-covered loans 21
3,005
—
3,026
18
2,893
2,911
Total recoveries 86
3,050
—
3,136
95
2,938
3,033
Ending balance $ 14,220
$ 139,353
$ 5,000
$ 158,573
$ 13,726
$ 140,750
$ 154,476

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The following table presents information about the balance of the ALLL and related loans at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
	Residential and Other Consumer		Commercial		Total		Residential and Other Consumer		Commercial		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Ending balance	$	11,236	$	100,905	$	112,141	$	10,788	$	99,143	$	109,931
Ending balance: loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	15	$	9,481	$	9,496	$	134	$	12,143	$	12,277
Ending balance: loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	11,221	$	91,424	$	102,645	$	10,654	$	87,000	$	97,654
Ending balance: ACI loans	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans:					0
Ending balance	$	5,267,788	$	17,324,061	$	22,591,849	$	4,948,989	$	17,028,019	$	21,977,008
Ending balance: loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	14,572	$	123,119	$	137,691	$	7,690	$	108,841	$	116,531
Ending balance: loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	5,079,187	$	17,183,398	$	22,262,585	$	4,751,076	$	16,901,253	$	21,652,329
Ending balance: ACI loans	$	174,029	$	17,544	$	191,573	$	190,223	$	17,925	$	208,148

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Unallocated Total Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:

Ending balance $ 14,220
$ 139,353
$ 5,000
$ 158,573
$ 11,503
$ 141,450
$ 152,953
Covered loans:
Ending balance $ 4,848
$ —
$ —
$ 4,848
$ 2,100
$ —
$ 2,100
Ending balance: non-ACI loans individually evaluated for impairment $ 1,024
$ —
$ —
$ 1,024
$ 529
$ —
$ 529
Ending balance: non-ACI loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 2,012
$ —
$ —
$ 2,012
$ 1,571
$ —
$ 1,571
Ending balance: ACI loans $ 1,812
$ —
$ —
$ 1,812
$ —
$ —
$ —
Non-covered loans:
Ending balance $ 9,372
$ 139,353
$ 5,000
$ 153,725
$ 9,403
$ 141,450
$ 150,853
Ending balance: new loans individually evaluated for impairment $ 71
$ 23,902
$ —
$ 23,973
$ 12
$ 19,229
$ 19,241
Ending balance: new loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 9,301
$ 115,451
$ 5,000
$ 129,752
$ 9,391
$ 122,221
$ 131,612
Ending balance: ACI loans $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
Loans: 0

Covered loans:
Ending balance $ 537,976
$ —
$ —
$ 537,976
$ 614,042
$ —
$ 614,042
Ending balance: non-ACI loans individually evaluated for impairment $ 11,721
$ —
$ —
$ 11,721
$ 12,396
$ —
$ 12,396
Ending balance: non-ACI loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 50,315
$ —
$ —
$ 50,315
$ 65,404
$ —
$ 65,404
Ending balance: ACI loans $ 475,940
$ —
$ —
$ 475,940
$ 536,242
$ —
$ 536,242
Non-covered loans:
Ending balance $ 4,033,612
$ 16,038,842
$ —
$ 20,072,454
$ 3,495,775
$ 15,285,577
$ 18,781,352
Ending balance: new loans individually evaluated for impairment $ 911
$ 210,364
$ —
$ 211,275
$ 561
$ 176,932
$ 177,493
Ending balance: new loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 4,032,701
$ 15,790,546
$ —
$ 19,823,247
$ 3,495,207
$ 15,061,707
$ 18,556,914
Ending balance: ACI loans $ —
$ 37,932
$ —
$ 37,932
$ 7
$ 46,938
$ 46,945

~~The ALLL on residential and other consumer ACI loans at September 30, 2017 represents impairment of one pool of ACI home equity loans and lines of credit.~~

The ALLL at September 30, 2017 included $5.4 million related to the impact of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey, which made landfall during the three months ended September 30, 2017. The ALLL includes $0.4 million related to commercial loans that were downgraded during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the hurricanes and a $5.0 million unallocated qualitative allowance.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Credit quality information

Loans, other than ACI loans and government insured residential loans, are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements. Commercial relationships ~~on non-accrual status~~ with committed balances

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

greater than or equal to $1.0 million that have internal risk ratings of substandard or doubtful and are on non-accrual status, as well as loans that have been modified in TDRs, are individually evaluated for impairment. Other commercial relationships on non-accrual status with committed balances under $1.0 million may also be evaluated individually for impairment at management's discretion. The likelihood of loss related to loans assigned internal risk ratings of substandard or doubtful is considered elevated due to their identified credit weaknesses. Factors considered by management in evaluating impairment include payment status, financial condition of the borrower, collateral value, and other factors impacting the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.

An ACI ~~loans~~pool or ~~pools are~~loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all of the ~~expected~~ cash flows expected at acquisition, ~~(as adjusted for any~~plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after ~~acquisition), other than due~~acquisition. 1-4 single family residential and home equity ACI loans accounted for in pools are evaluated collectively for impairment on a pool by pool basis based on expected pool cash flows. Commercial ACI loans are individually evaluated for impairment based on expected cash flows from the individual loans. Discount continues to ~~changes~~be accreted on ACI loans or pools as long as there are expected future cash flows in ~~interest rate indices~~excess of the current carrying amount of the loans or pools.

The table below presents information about loans identified as impaired at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
	Recorded Investment		UPB		Related Specific Allowance		Recorded Investment		UPB		Related Specific Allowance
With no specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential ⁽¹⁾	$	10,005	$	9,922	$	—	$	5,724	$	5,605	$	—
Multi-family	24,834		24,866		—		25,560		25,592		—
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	26,101		26,134		—		12,293		12,209		—
Construction and land	9,418		9,421		—		9,923		9,925		—
Owner occupied commercial real estate	14,791		14,890		—		9,007		9,024		—
Commercial and industrial	8,432		8,436		—		13,514		13,519		—
Commercial lending subsidiaries	5,205		5,226		—		3,152		3,149		—
With a specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential	4,567		4,496		15		1,966		1,941		134
Owner occupied commercial real estate	—		—		—		3,316		3,322		844
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	—		—		—		1,666		1,667		731
Commercial and industrial	24,522		24,524		6,533		10,939		10,946		3,831
Commercial lending subsidiaries	9,816		9,736		2,948		19,471		19,385		6,737
Total:
Residential and other consumer	$	14,572	$	14,418	$	15	$	7,690	$	7,546	$	134
Commercial	123,119		123,233		9,481		108,841		108,738		12,143
	$	137,691	$	137,651	$	9,496	$	116,531	$	116,284	$	12,277


(1)	Includes government insured residential loans modified in TDRs totaling $9.9 million and $3.5 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Included in the table above is the guaranteed portion of impaired SBA loans totaling $21.8 million and ~~prepayment assumptions.~~$13.1 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, with no specific allowance recorded. Interest income recognized on impaired loans was immaterial for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

2118

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

~~The table below presents information about loans or ACI pools identified as impaired at the dates indicated (in thousands):~~

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016

Recorded
Investment
UPB
Related
Specific
Allowance

Recorded
Investment
UPB
Related
Specific
Allowance
Non-covered loans:

With no specific allowance recorded:

1-4 single family residential $ 27
$ 32
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 9,041
9,224
—
510
512
—
Construction and land 1,238
1,238
—
1,238
1,238
—
Owner occupied commercial real estate 16,786
16,949
—
16,834
16,894
—
Commercial and industrial

Taxi medallion loans 20,320
20,321
—
18,107
18,107
—
Other commercial and industrial 1,081
1,095
—
6,172
6,172
—
Commercial lending subsidiaries 12,810
12,815
—
10,620
10,510
—
With a specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential 884
863
71
561
546
12
Owner occupied commercial real estate 3,961
3,943
2,994
491
513
263
Commercial and industrial

Taxi medallion loans 100,252
100,255
13,117
73,131
73,147
5,948
Other commercial and industrial 41,297
41,292
7,313
29,452
29,463
9,168
Commercial lending subsidiaries 3,578
3,553
478
21,712
21,605
3,850
Total:
Residential and other consumer $ 911
$ 895
$ 71
$ 561
$ 546
$ 12
Commercial 210,364
210,685
23,902
178,267
178,161
19,229
$ 211,275
$ 211,580
$ 23,973
$ 178,828
$ 178,707
$ 19,241
Covered loans:
Non-ACI loans:

With no specific allowance recorded:

1-4 single family residential $ 102
$ 118
$ —
$ 1,169
$ 1,391
$ —
Home equity loans and lines of credit 1,312
1,324
—
2,255
2,286
—
With a specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential 2,221
2,579
208
1,272
1,514
181
Home equity loans and lines of credit 8,086
8,163
816
7,700
7,804
348
$ 11,721
$ 12,184
$ 1,024
$ 12,396
$ 12,995
$ 529
ACI loans:

With a specific allowance recorded:

Home equity loans and lines of credit $ 5,640
$ 27,731
$ 1,812
$ —
$ —
$ —

Non-covered impaired loans include commercial real estate ACI loans modified in TDRs with a carrying value of $1.3 million as of December 31, 2016. Interest income recognized on impaired loans and pools for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $2.9 million and $8.3 million, respectively. Interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was not material.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The following ~~tables present~~table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans ~~or ACI pools~~ for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	12,732	$	6,932	$	11,011	$	5,764

Commercial:
Multi-family	25,066		26,260		25,248		25,490
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	24,599		14,123		21,563		13,499
Construction and land	9,604		5,244		9,730		4,196
Owner occupied commercial real estate	12,741		16,751		12,124		19,175
Commercial and industrial⁽¹⁾	32,690		109,186		30,564		109,749
Commercial lending subsidiaries	18,082		1,506		19,982		1,816
	122,782		173,070		119,211		173,925
	$	135,514	$	180,002	$	130,222	$	179,689

Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Covered Loans Covered Loans
Non-Covered Loans
Non-ACI
Loans
ACI Loans Non-Covered Loans Non-ACI
Loans ACI Loans
Residential and other consumer:

1-4 single family residential $ 962
$ 2,304
$ —
$ 344
$ 3,001
$ —
Home equity loans and lines of credit —
9,533
5,166
—
9,551
—
962
$ 11,837
$ 5,166
344
$ 12,552
$ —
Commercial:
Multi-family 1,359
—

Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 8,216
506

Construction and land 2,797
1,285

Owner occupied commercial real estate 20,579
18,231

Commercial and industrial

Taxi medallion loans 123,867
56,125

Other commercial and industrial 42,479
48,143

Commercial lending subsidiaries 21,398
13,873

220,695
138,163

$ 221,657
$ 138,507

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Covered Loans Covered Loans
Non-Covered Loans
Non-ACI
Loans
ACI Loans Non-Covered Loans Non-ACI
Loans ACI Loans
Residential and other consumer:

1-4 single family residential $ 800
$ 2,369
$ —
$ 251
$ 3,186
$ —
Home equity loans and lines of credit —
9,638
4,209
—
8,920
—
800
$ 12,007
$ 4,209
251
$ 12,106
$ —
Commercial:
Multi-family 1,816
—

Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 4,056
776

Construction and land 3,317
650

Owner occupied commercial real estate 18,872
13,711

Commercial and industrial

Taxi medallion loans 107,529
30,977

Other commercial and industrial 43,308
41,975

Commercial lending subsidiaries 27,202
11,293

206,100
99,382

$ 206,900
$ 99,633

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~


(1)	Includes average recorded investment in taxi medallion loans totaling $93 million and $97 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

The following table presents the recorded investment in loans on non-accrual status as of the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Non-Covered Loans		Covered Non-ACI Loans		Non-Covered Loans		Covered Non-ACI Loans		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	1,890	$	934	$	566	$	918	$	10,807	$	6,316
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—		2,369		—		2,283		30		—
Other consumer loans	332		—		2		—		277		288
	2,222		$	3,303	568		$	3,201	11,114		6,604
Commercial:
Multi-family									24,834		25,560
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	9,930				559				27,623		16,050
Construction and land	1,238				1,238				9,418		9,923
Owner occupied commercial real estate	21,455				19,439				21,752		19,789
Commercial and industrial									27,176		28,584
Taxi medallion loans	120,572				60,660
Other commercial and industrial	27,569				16,036
Commercial lending subsidiaries	16,625				32,645				16,236		22,733
	197,389				130,577				127,039		122,639
	$	199,611			$	131,145			$	138,153	$	129,243

~~Non-covered~~Included in the table above is the guaranteed portion of non-accrual SBA loans totaling $28.4 million and $17.8 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Loans contractually delinquent by 90 days or more and still accruing totaled $0.7 million at December 31, 2018. There were no loans contractually delinquent by 90 days or more and still accruing ~~totaled $0.8 million and $1.6 million~~ at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.~~2019. The amount of additional interest income that would have been recognized on non-accrual loans had they performed in accordance with their contractual terms was approximately ~~$1.4~~$2.5 million and ~~$3.7~~$4.3 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, respectively, and ~~$1.1~~$1.8 million and ~~$2.3~~$3.0 million ~~for the~~ three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

Management considers delinquency status to be the most meaningful indicator of the credit quality of 1-4 single family residential, home equity and consumer loans. Delinquency statistics are updated at least monthly. See "Aging of loans" below

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

for more information on the delinquency status of loans. Original LTV and original FICO score are also important indicators of credit quality for ~~the non-covered~~ 1-4 single family residential ~~portfolio.~~loans other than the FSB loans and government insured loans.

Internal risk ratings are considered the most meaningful indicator of credit quality for commercial loans. Internal risk ratings are a key factor in identifying loans that are individually evaluated for impairment and impact management’s estimates of loss factors used in determining the amount of the ALLL. Internal risk ratings are updated on a continuous basis. Generally, relationships with balances in excess of defined thresholds, ranging from $1 million to $3 million, are re-evaluated at least annually and more frequently if circumstances indicate that a change in risk rating may be warranted. Loans exhibiting potential credit weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention and that if left uncorrected may result in deterioration of the repayment capacity of the borrower are categorized as special mention. Loans with well-defined credit weaknesses, including payment defaults, declining collateral values, frequent overdrafts, operating losses, increasing balance sheet leverage, inadequate cash flow, project cost overruns, unreasonable construction delays, past due real estate taxes or exhausted interest reserves, are assigned an internal risk rating of substandard. A loan with a weakness so severe that collection in full is highly questionable or improbable, but because of certain reasonably specific pending factors has not been charged off, will be assigned an internal risk rating of doubtful.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The following tables summarize key indicators of credit quality for the Company's loans at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (in thousands):

1-4 Single Family Residential credit exposure for ~~non-covered~~loans, excluding FSB loans and government insured residential loans, based on original LTV and FICO score:


	September 30, 2017										June 30, 2019
	FICO										FICO
LTV	720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total		720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total
60% or less	$	94,357	$	111,279	$	185,614	$	819,422	$	1,210,672
Less than 60%											$	110,475	$	124,463	$	190,874	$	796,918	$	1,222,730
60% - 70%	93,963		102,461		140,350		586,158		922,932		139,870		120,664		178,995		625,452		1,064,981
70% - 80%	139,923		173,808		316,544		1,091,868		1,722,143		183,277		221,490		400,406		1,375,700		2,180,873
More than 80%	24,725		20,610		24,981		85,781		156,097		21,467		35,938		39,863		147,703		244,971
	$	352,968	$	408,158	$	667,489	$	2,583,229	$	4,011,844	$	455,089	$	502,555	$	810,138	$	2,945,773	$	4,713,555


	December 31, 2016										December 31, 2018
	FICO										FICO
LTV	720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total		720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total
60% or less	$	87,035	$	113,401	$	163,668	$	751,291	$	1,115,395
Less than 60%											$	105,812	$	123,877	$	197,492	$	813,944	$	1,241,125
60% - 70%	80,694		94,592		124,180		523,970		823,436		120,982		109,207		170,531		597,659		998,379
70% - 80%	110,509		148,211		276,425		907,450		1,442,595		156,519		203,121		374,311		1,264,491		1,998,442
More than 80%	22,115		9,058		15,470		42,280		88,923		17,352		35,036		36,723		136,487		225,598
	$	300,353	$	365,262	$	579,743	$	2,224,991	$	3,470,349	$	400,665	$	471,241	$	779,057	$	2,812,581	$	4,463,544

2520

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

Commercial credit exposure, based on internal risk rating:


	September 30, 2017																June 30, 2019
									Commercial and Industrial																		Commercial Lending Subsidiaries
	Multi-Family		Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Construction and Land		Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Taxi Medallion Loans		Other Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Lending Subsidiaries		Total		Multi-Family		Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Construction and Land		Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Pinnacle		Bridge		Total
Pass	$	3,299,753	$	4,069,749	$	265,921	$	1,890,785	$	—	$	3,666,227	$	2,313,152	$	15,505,587	$	2,335,356	$	4,826,910	$	227,476	$	2,026,416	$	5,063,682	$	1,269,469	$	1,207,657	$	16,956,966
Special mention	32,255		12,824		—		31,495		—		38,389		35,936		150,899		—		6,744		—		20,212		24,014		—		8,817		59,787
Substandard	30,253		90,996		5,535		31,460		120,572		64,087		33,637		376,540		47,760		100,403		9,418		31,189		61,264		—		50,726		300,760
Doubtful	—		—		—		3,009		—		2,807		—		5,816		—		—		—		—		3,683		—		2,865		6,548
	$	3,362,261	$	4,173,569	$	271,456	$	1,956,749	$	120,572	$	3,771,510	$	2,382,725	$	16,038,842	$	2,383,116	$	4,934,057	$	236,894	$	2,077,817	$	5,152,643	$	1,269,469	$	1,270,065	$	17,324,061

December 31, 2016
Commercial and Industrial
Multi-Family Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate
Construction
and Land
Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate Taxi Medallion Loans Other Commercial and Industrial Commercial Lending Subsidiaries Total
Pass $ 3,811,822
$ 3,694,931
$ 309,675
$ 1,672,199
$ 40,460
$ 3,112,590
$ 2,255,444
$ 14,897,121
Special mention 12,000
7,942
—
33,274
—
19,009
—
72,225
Substandard 5,852
28,935
1,238
30,377
138,035
68,704
31,572
304,713
Doubtful —
—
—
—
178
8,162
3,178
11,518
$ 3,829,674
$ 3,731,808

$ 310,913
$ 1,735,850

$ 178,673

$ 3,208,465
$ 2,290,194

$ 15,285,577

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~



	December 31, 2018
											Commercial Lending Subsidiaries
	Multi-Family		Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Construction and Land		Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Pinnacle		Bridge		Total
Pass	$	2,547,835	$	4,611,029	$	216,917	$	2,077,611	$	4,706,666	$	1,462,655	$	1,105,821	$	16,728,534
Special mention	2,932		16,516		—		13,368		38,097		—		10,157		81,070
Substandard	34,654		61,335		9,923		28,901		43,691		—		31,522		210,026
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		1,746		—		6,643		8,389
	$	2,585,421	$	4,688,880	$	226,840	$	2,119,880	$	4,790,200	$	1,462,655	$	1,154,143	$	17,028,019

Aging of loans:

The following table presents an aging of loans at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019										December 31, 2018
	Current		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total		Current		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total
1-4 single family residential	$	4,835,228	$	49,673	$	2,522	$	10,129	$	4,897,552	$	4,640,771	$	15,070	$	2,126	$	6,953	$	4,664,920
Government insured residential	37,086		16,530		14,878		287,225		355,719		31,348		8,342		8,871		218,168		266,729
Home equity loans and lines of credit	1,393		22		—		30		1,445		1,393		—		—		—		1,393
Other consumer loans	12,400		672		—		—		13,072		15,947		—		—		—		15,947
Multi-family	2,364,546		18,570		—		—		2,383,116		2,585,421		—		—		—		2,585,421
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,927,847		714		559		4,937		4,934,057		4,682,443		3,621		1,374		1,442		4,688,880
Construction and land	236,012		—		—		882		236,894		224,828		916		—		1,096		226,840
Owner occupied commercial real estate	2,064,064		2,124		—		11,629		2,077,817		2,106,104		2,826		1,087		9,863		2,119,880
Commercial and industrial	5,136,585		5,498		367		10,193		5,152,643		4,772,978		6,732		926		9,564		4,790,200
Commercial lending subsidiaries
Pinnacle	1,269,469		—		—		—		1,269,469		1,462,655		—		—		—		1,462,655
Bridge	1,252,556		13,879		—		3,630		1,270,065		1,152,312		603		—		1,228		1,154,143
	$	22,137,186	$	107,682	$	18,326	$	328,655	$	22,591,849	$	21,676,200	$	38,110	$	14,384	$	248,314	$	21,977,008

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Current
30 - 59
Days Past
Due

60 - 89
Days Past
Due

90 Days or
More Past
Due
Total Current
30 - 59
Days Past
Due

60 - 89
Days Past
Due

90 Days or
More Past
Due
Total
Non-covered loans:

1-4 single family residential $ 3,994,758
$ 13,964
$ 444
$ 2,678
$ 4,011,844
$ 3,457,606
$ 10,355
$ 325
$ 2,063
$ 3,470,349
Home equity loans and lines of credit 1,623
21
—
—
1,644
1,120
—
—
—
1,120
Other consumer loans 19,623
500
—
1
20,124
24,306
—
—
—
24,306
Multi-family 3,362,261
—
—
—
3,362,261
3,829,674
—
—
—
3,829,674
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 4,171,880
—
—
1,689
4,173,569
3,730,470
754
—
584
3,731,808
Construction and land 270,218
—
—
1,238
271,456
309,675
—
—
1,238
310,913
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1,947,728
1,261
266
7,494
1,956,749
1,726,826
1,557
797
6,670
1,735,850
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans 107,325
—
2,803
10,444
120,572
137,856
7,037
4,563
29,217
178,673
Other commercial and industrial 3,769,065
1,629
58
758
3,771,510
3,198,008
2,515
954
6,988
3,208,465
Commercial lending subsidiaries 2,382,725
—
—
—
2,382,725
2,284,435
12
3,247
2,500
2,290,194
$ 20,027,206
$ 17,375
$ 3,571
$ 24,302
$ 20,072,454
$ 18,699,976
$ 22,230
$ 9,886
$ 49,260
$ 18,781,352
Covered loans:
Non-ACI loans:

1-4 single family residential $ 23,002
$ 691
$ —
$ 934
$ 24,627
$ 29,406
$ 481
$ —
$ 918
$ 30,805
Home equity loans and lines of credit 33,263
1,114
663
2,369
37,409
43,129
1,255
534
2,077
46,995
$ 56,265
$ 1,805
$ 663
$ 3,303
$ 62,036
$ 72,535
$ 1,736
$ 534
$ 2,995
$ 77,800
ACI loans:
1-4 single family residential $ 436,051
$ 14,126
$ 2,549
$ 17,574
$ 470,300
$ 500,272
$ 13,524
$ 2,990
$ 15,562
$ 532,348
Home equity loans and lines of credit 4,876
89
40
635
5,640
3,460
148
23
263
3,894
$ 440,927
$ 14,215
$ 2,589
$ 18,209
$ 475,940
$ 503,732
$ 13,672
$ 3,013
$ 15,825
$ 536,242

~~1-4 single family residential and home equity ACI~~Included in the table above is the guaranteed portion of SBA loans ~~that are contractually delinquent by~~past due more than 90 days ~~and accounted for in pools that are on accrual status because discount continues to be accreted totaled $18~~totaling $18.4 million and ~~$16~~$8.8 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

Foreclosure of residential real estate

The carrying amount of foreclosed residential real estate ~~properties~~ included in "Other assets" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets ~~all of which were covered,~~ totaled $4$5 million and $5$6 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. The recorded investment in non-government insured residential mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure was $1.6 million at June 30, 2019 and was insignificant at December 31, 2018. The recorded investment in government insured residential loans in the process of foreclosure totaled ~~$13~~$93 million and $8$85 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016, respectively, substantially all of which were covered loans.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

2018, respectively.

Troubled debt restructurings

The following ~~table summarizes~~tables summarize loans that were modified in TDRs during the periods indicated, as well as loans modified during the twelve months preceding ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018 that experienced payment defaults during the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Loans Modified in TDRs
During the Period TDRs Experiencing Payment
Defaults During the Period Loans Modified in TDRs
During the Period TDRs Experiencing Payment
Defaults During the Period
Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment
Non-covered loans:

1-4 single family residential —
$ —
2
$ 269
—
$ —
—
$ —
Owner occupied commercial real estate —
—
—
—
1
491
—
—
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans 15
5,439
6
2,105
18
29,854
8
4,104
Other commercial and industrial 1
978
—
—
2
1,646
—

Commercial lending subsidiaries —
—
—
—
5
4,433
1
3,500
16
$ 6,417
8
$ 2,374
26
$ 36,424
9
$ 7,604
Covered loans:
Non-ACI loans:

Home equity loans and lines of credit —
$ —
1
$ 70
10
$ 1,671
—
$ —
ACI loans:
Owner occupied commercial real estate —
$ —
—
$ —
1
$ 839
—
$ —



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019						2018
	Loans Modified in TDRs During the Period			TDRs Experiencing Payment Defaults During the Period			Loans Modified in TDRs During the Period			TDRs Experiencing Payment Defaults During the Period
	Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment
1-4 single family residential⁽¹⁾	34	$	5,164	31	$	4,355	9	$	2,106	3	$	507
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1	12,085		1	2,772		—	—		—	—
Owner occupied commercial real estate	—	—		3	1,878		—	—		—	—
Commercial and industrial	4	7,354		1	1,233		3	415		2	437
Commercial lending subsidiaries	1	2,073		—	—		—	—		—	—
	40	$	26,676	36	$	10,238	12	$	2,521	5	$	944

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Loans Modified in TDRs
During the Period TDRs Experiencing Payment
Defaults During the Period Loans Modified in TDRs
During the Period TDRs Experiencing Payment
Defaults During the Period
Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment
Non-covered loans:

1-4 single family residential 4
$ 351
2
$ 269
1
$ 107
—
$ —
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 1
5,389
—
—
—
—
—
—
Owner occupied commercial real estate 2
4,522
—
—
3
5,225
—
—
Commercial and industrial

Taxi medallion loans 97
48,692
8
3,509
58
57,341
8
4,104
Other commercial and industrial 14
20,860
—
—
7
21,422
1
3,500
Commercial lending subsidiaries 1
12,810
—
—
6
7,933
—
—
119
$ 92,624
10
$ 3,778
75
$ 92,028
9
$ 7,604
Covered loans:
Non-ACI loans:

Home equity loans and lines of credit 5
$ 939
1
$ 70
16
$ 2,293
—
$ —
ACI loans:
Owner occupied commercial real estate —
$ —
—
$ —
1
$ 839
—
$ —


(1)	Includes government insured residential loans modified totaling $5 million and $1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019						2018
	Loans Modified in TDRs During the Period			TDRs Experiencing Payment Defaults During the Period			Loans Modified in TDRs During the Period			TDRs Experiencing Payment Defaults During the Period
	Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment
1-4 single family residential⁽¹⁾	48	$	7,345	32	$	4,517	17	$	5,545	3	$	507
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1	12,085		1	2,772		—	—		—	—
Owner occupied commercial real estate	1	849		3	1,878		—	—		—	—
Commercial and industrial	6	17,994		1	1,233		8	1,517		5	1,372
Commercial lending subsidiaries	4	4,085		—	—		—	—		—	—
	60	$	42,358	37	$	10,400	25	$	7,062	8	$	1,879


(1)	Includes government insured residential loans modified totaling $7 million and $1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Modifications during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 included interest rate reductions, restructuring of the amount and timing of required periodic payments, extensions of maturity and covenant waivers. Included in TDRs are residential loans to borrowers who have not reaffirmed their debt discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The total amount of such loans is not material. Modified ACI loans accounted for in pools are not considered TDRs, are not separated from the pools and are not classified as impaired loans.

2822

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

Note 5 ~~FDIC Indemnification Asset~~Leases

~~When~~Leases under which the Company ~~recognizes gains or losses related~~is the lessee

The Company leases branches, office space and a small amount of equipment under operating and finance leases with terms ranging from one to ~~covered~~16 years, some of which include extension options.

The following table presents ROU assets in its consolidated financial statements, changes in the estimated amount recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements with respect to those gains or losses are also reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Covered loans may be resolved through prepayment, short saleand lease liabilities as of the underlying collateral, foreclosure, sale of the loans or charge-off. For loans resolved through prepayment, short sale or foreclosure, the difference between consideration received in satisfaction of the loans and the carrying value of the loans is recognized in the consolidated statement of income line item “Income from resolution of covered assets, net.” Losses from the resolution of covered loans increase the amount recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements. Gains from the resolution of covered loans reduce the amount recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements. Similarly, differences in proceeds received on the sale of covered OREO and covered loans and their carrying amounts result in gains or losses and reduce or increase the amount recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements. Increases in valuation allowances or impairment charges related to covered assets also increase the amount estimated to be recoverable from the FDIC. These additions to or reductions in amounts recoverable from the FDIC related to transactions in the covered assets are recorded in the consolidated statement of income line item “Net gain (loss) on FDIC indemnification” and reflected as corresponding increases or decreases in the FDIC indemnification asset.

~~In addition, through~~ June 30, ~~2017, recoveries of previously indemnified losses on~~2019 (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019
ROU assets:
Operating leases	$	87,596
Finance leases	6,627
	$	94,223
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases	$	96,908
Finance leases	8,926
	$	105,834

ROU assets ~~that were formerly covered under the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement resulted in reimbursements due to the FDIC. These transactions~~and lease liabilities for operating leases are included in ~~the tables below. Amounts payable to the FDIC resulting from these transactions are recognized in other liabilities~~"other assets" and "other liabilities", respectively, in the accompanying ~~consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016.~~Consolidated Balance Sheet. ROU assets and lease liabilities for finance leases are included in "other assets" and "notes and other borrowings", respectively.

The ~~following tables summarize the~~weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate at June 30, 2019 were:



Weighted average remaining lease term:
Operating lease	7.89 years
Finance lease	6.30 years
Weighted average discount rate:
Operating lease	3.4	%
Finance lease	11.7	%

The components of the gains and losses associated with covered assets, along with the related additions to or reductions in the amounts recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements, as reflected in the consolidated statements of incomelease expense for the ~~periods~~period indicated were (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Transaction
Income (Loss) Net Loss on FDIC
Indemnification Net Impact
on Pre-tax
Earnings Transaction
Income (Loss) Net Gain on FDIC
Indemnification Net Impact
on Pre-tax
Earnings
Recovery of (provision for) losses on covered loans $ (261 ) $ 215
$ (46 ) $ 445
$ (368 ) $ 77
Income from resolution of covered assets, net 6,400
(5,082 ) 1,318
8,883
(7,106 ) 1,777
Loss on sale of covered loans —
—
—
(10,033 ) 8,026
(2,007 )
Loss on covered OREO (35 ) 29
(6 ) (552 ) 441
(111 )
$ 6,104
$ (4,838 ) $ 1,266
$ (1,257 ) $ 993
$ (264 )



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Operating lease cost	$	5,046	$	10,080
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of ROU assets	$	359	$	709
Interest on lease liabilities	250		505
Total finance lease cost	$	609	$	1,214

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Transaction
Income (Loss) Net Loss on FDIC
Indemnification Net Impact
on Pre-tax
Earnings Transaction
Income (Loss) Net Loss on FDIC
Indemnification Net Impact
on Pre-tax
Earnings
Recovery of (provision for) losses on covered loans $ (2,693 ) $ 2,095
$ (598 ) $ 1,119
$ (1,007 ) $ 112
Income from resolution of covered assets, net 22,066
(17,591 ) 4,475
26,426
(21,140 ) 5,286
Loss on sale of covered loans (1,582 ) 1,266
(316 ) (14,895 ) 11,958
(2,937 )
Loss on covered OREO (65 ) 56
(9 ) (957 ) 779
(178 )
$ 17,726
$ (14,174 ) $ 3,552
$ 11,693
$ (9,410 ) $ 2,283

2923

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

~~Changes in~~Short-term lease cost, variable lease cost, and sublease income were immaterial for the ~~FDIC indemnification asset~~three and ~~in the liability to the FDIC for recoveries~~six months ended June 30, 2019.

Additional information related to ~~assets previously covered under the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement~~operating and finance leases for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, were as~~periods indicated follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from finance leases	$	250	$	505
Operating cash flows from operating leases	5,216		10,359
Financing cash flows from finance leases	726		1,461
	$	6,192	$	12,325

Lease liabilities recognized from obtaining ROU assets:
Operating lease liabilities recognized upon adoption of ASC 842	$	—	$	104,064
Operating leases	1,597		1,597
Finance leases	—		1,521
	$	1,597	$	107,182

Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 739,843
Amortization (160,091 )
Reduction for claims filed (46,083 )
Net loss on FDIC indemnification (17,759 )
Balance at December 31, 2016 515,910
Amortization (135,351 )
Reduction for claims filed (16,768 )
Net loss on FDIC indemnification (14,174 )
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 349,617

~~The balances at September~~Future lease payment obligations under leases with terms in excess of one year and a reconciliation to lease liabilities as of June 30, ~~2017 and December 31, 2016 are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as~~2019 follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
FDIC indemnification asset $ 349,617
$ 515,933
Other liabilities —
(23 )
$ 349,617
$ 515,910



	Operating Leases			Finance Leases			Total
Years ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the six months ending June 30, 2019)	$	10,379		$	939		$	11,318
2020	17,499			2,456			19,955
2021	15,762			2,514			18,276
2022	12,524			2,053			14,577
2023	10,764			2,124			12,888
Thereafter	43,873			2,825			46,698
Total future minimum lease payments	110,801			12,911			123,712
Less: interest component	(13,893		)	(3,985		)	(17,878		)
Lease liabilities	$	96,908		$	8,926		$	105,834

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

As of December 31, 2018, future minimum rentals under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year were as follows (in thousands):



Years ending December 31:
2019	$	21,207
2020	17,629
2021	15,858
2022	12,114
2023	10,311
Thereafter through 2034	42,984
	$	120,103

Leases under which the Company is the lessor

Through its commercial lending subsidiaries, Pinnacle and Bridge, the Bank provides equipment financing using a variety of loan and lease structures. Pinnacle provides essential use equipment financing to state and local governmental entities. Bridge provides primarily transportation equipment financing.

The following table presents the components of the investment in direct or sales type financing leases, included in loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Total minimum lease payments to be received	$	844,442		$	808,921
Estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased assets	8,369			7,355
Gross investment in direct or sales type financing leases	852,811			816,276
Unearned income	(83,943		)	(81,864		)
Initial direct costs	4,728			4,833
	$	773,596		$	739,245

As of June 30, 2019, future minimum lease payments to be received under direct or sales type financing leases were as follows (in thousands):



Years Ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the six months ending June 30, 2019)	$	122,931
2020	192,841
2021	132,419
2022	88,202
2023	68,031
Thereafter	240,018
	$	844,442

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

Equipment under operating lease consists primarily of railcars, non-commercial aircraft and other transportation equipment leased to commercial end users. Original lease terms generally range from three to ten years. Asset risk is evaluated and managed by a dedicated internal staff of seasoned equipment finance professionals with a broad depth and breadth of experience in the leasing business. Additionally, we have partnered with an industry leading, experienced service provider who provides fleet management and servicing relating to the railcar fleet. Residual risk is managed by setting appropriate residual values at inception and systematic reviews of residual values based on independent appraisals, performed at least annually. We endeavor to lease to a stable end-user base, maintain a relatively young and diversified fleet of assets and stagger lease maturities.

As of June 30, 2019, scheduled minimum rental payments under operating leases were as follows (in thousands):



Years Ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the six months ending June 30, 2019)	$	34,159
2020	62,299
2021	52,949
2022	46,162
2023	37,951
Thereafter through 2034	109,933
	$	343,453

Lease income recognized for operating leases and direct or sales type finance leases follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Location of Lease Income on Consolidated Statements of Income
Operating leases	$	17,005	$	34,191	Non-interest income from lease financing
Direct or sales type finance leases	5,489		10,798		Interest income on loans
Total lease income	$	22,494	$	44,989

Note 6Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was ~~32.2%~~25.2% and ~~31.7%~~25.9% for the three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 and 2016,~~2019, respectively, and ~~31.2%~~23.2% and ~~33.2%~~23.1% for the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 and 2016,~~2018, respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the statutory federal income tax rate of ~~35% in all periods~~21% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 due primarily to ~~the effect of~~state income taxes, offset by income not subject to tax, offset by state income taxes. In addition, the effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflected the impact of $0.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in excess tax benefits resulting from activity related to vesting of share-based awards and exercise of stock options.

The Company has investments in affordable housing limited partnerships which generate federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits and other tax benefits. The balance of these investments, included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, was $66 million and $71 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Unfunded commitments for affordable housing investments, included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, were $29 million and $53 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company's involvement with these limited partnerships at September 30, 2017 was approximately $73 million. While the Company believes the likelihood of potential losses from these investments is remote, the maximum exposure was determined by assuming a scenario where the projects completely fail and do not meet certain government compliance requirements resulting in recapture of the related tax credits. These investments did not have a material impact on income tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.tax.

Note 7 Derivatives and Hedging Activities

The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk related to liabilities that expose the Company to variability in cash flows due to changes in interest rates. The Company enters into LIBOR-based interest rate swaps that are designated as cash flow hedges with the objective of limiting the variability of interest payment cash flows resulting from changes in the benchmark interest rate LIBOR. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments are reported in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period in which the related interest on the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The Company also enters into interest rate derivative contracts with certain of its commercial borrowers to enable those borrowers to manage their exposure to interest rate fluctuations. To mitigate interest rate risk associated with these derivative contracts, the Company enters into offsetting derivative contract positions with primary dealers. These interest rate derivative contracts are not designated as hedging instruments; therefore, changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized immediately in earnings. The impact on earnings related to changes in fair value of these derivatives for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 was not material.

The Company may be exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its interest rate derivative agreements. The Company assesses the credit risk of its financial institution counterparties by monitoring publicly available credit rating and financial information. The Company manages dealer credit risk by entering into interest rate

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

derivatives only with primary and highly rated counterparties, the use of ISDA master agreements, central clearing mechanisms and counterparty limits. The agreements contain bilateral collateral arrangements with the amount of collateral to be posted generally governed by the settlement value of outstanding swaps. The Company manages the risk of default by its borrower counterparties through its normal loan underwriting and credit monitoring policies and procedures. The Company does not currently anticipate any losses from failure of interest rate derivative counterparties to honor their obligations.

The CME ~~amended its rules effective January 2017 to~~ legally ~~characterize~~characterizes variation margin payments for centrally cleared derivatives as settlements of the derivatives' exposures rather than collateral. As a result, the variation margin payment and the related derivative instruments are considered a single unit of account for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The Company's clearing agent for interest rate derivative contracts centrally cleared through the CME settles the variation margin daily with the CME; therefore, those interest rate derivative contracts the Company clears through the CME are reported at a fair value of approximately zero at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019 and December 31, 2018.

The following tables set forth certain information concerning the Company’s interest rate contract derivative financial instruments and related hedged items at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2017																		June 30, 2019
		Weighted Average Pay Rate		Weighted Average Receive Rate		Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years															Weighted Average Pay Rate		Weighted Average Receive Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years
					Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value												Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value
	Hedged Item						Asset				Liability		Hedged Item							Asset					Balance Sheet Location	Liability
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:					Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location														Notional Amount
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps	Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings		1.77%			3-Month Libor	4.6		$	2,046,000		Other assets / Other liabilities		$	1,066			$	(259	)	Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings		2.37%	3-Month Libor	3.7		$	3,131,000		Other assets / Other liabilities		$	—			$	(1,485	)
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps		3.86%		Indexed to 1-month Libor		6.4	1,000,763				Other assets / Other liabilities	7,605				(18,311		)	��		4.09%		Indexed to 1-month Libor	6.0	1,130,652				Other assets / Other liabilities	1,616				(16,236		)
Pay-variable interest rate swaps		Indexed to 1-month Libor		3.86%		6.4	1,000,763				Other assets / Other liabilities	19,648				(8,491		)			Indexed to 1-month Libor		4.09%	6.0	1,130,652				Other assets / Other liabilities	39,789				(1,530		)
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month Libor				2.80%		1.6	145,957				Other assets	15				—							3.62%	0.9	80,313				Other assets	—				—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month Libor		2.80%				1.6	145,957				Other liabilities	—				(15		)			3.62%			0.9	80,313				Other liabilities	—				—
							$	4,339,440				$	28,334			$	(27,076	)							$	5,552,930				$	41,405			$	(19,251	)

3127

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019



	December 31, 2018
		Weighted Average Pay Rate	Weighted Average Receive Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years
					Notional Amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
	Hedged Item				Notional Amount		Balance Sheet Location	Asset		Liability
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps	Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings	2.38%	3-Month Libor	4.0	$	2,846,000	Other assets / Other liabilities	$	3,405	$	—
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps		4.10%	Indexed to 1-month Libor	6.0	1,048,196		Other assets / Other liabilities	14,883		(6,991		)
Pay-variable interest rate swaps		Indexed to 1-month Libor	4.10%	6.0	1,048,196		Other assets / Other liabilities	11,318		(16,874		)
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month Libor			3.43%	1.2	98,407		Other assets	9		—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month Libor		3.43%		1.2	98,407		Other liabilities	—		(9		)
					$	5,139,206		$	29,615	$	(23,874	)

December 31, 2016

Weighted
Average Pay Rate

Weighted
Average Receive Rate

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life in Years

Notional Amount Balance Sheet Location Fair Value
Hedged Item Asset Liability
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:

Pay-fixed interest rate swaps Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings 1.58% 3-Month Libor 3.3 $ 1,715,000
Other assets / Other liabilities $ 19,648
$ (3,112 )
Pay-fixed forward-starting interest rate swaps Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings 3.43% 3-Month Libor 10.5 300,000
Other liabilities —
(27,866 )
Derivatives not designated as hedges:

Pay-fixed interest rate swaps 3.77% Indexed to 1-month Libor 6.8 912,000
Other assets / Other liabilities 9,949
(20,383 )
Pay-variable interest rate swaps Indexed to 1-month Libor 3.77% 6.8 912,000
Other assets / Other liabilities 20,383
(9,949 )
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month Libor
2.96% 2.3 189,057
Other assets 252
—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month Libor 2.96% 2.3 189,057
Other liabilities —
(252 )
$ 4,217,114
$ 50,232
$ (61,562 )

The following table provides information about the amount of ~~loss~~gain (loss) related to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI into interest expense for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Amount of Loss Reclassified from AOCI on Derivatives
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships 2017 2016 2017 2016 Location of Loss Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Interest rate contracts $ (2,001 ) $ (3,741 ) $ (7,463 ) $ (13,050 ) Interest expense on borrowings



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018		2019		2018			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Interest rate contracts	$	1,688	$	728	$	4,411	$	(211	)	Interest expense on borrowings

During the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, no derivative positions designated as cash flow hedges were discontinued and none of the gains and losses reported in AOCI were reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges or because of the early extinguishment of debt. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the amount of net loss expected to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the next twelve months was ~~$6.2~~$11.5 million.

Some of the Company’s ISDA master agreements with financial institution counterparties contain provisions that permit either counterparty to terminate the agreements and require settlement in the event that regulatory capital ratios fall below certain designated thresholds, upon the initiation of other defined regulatory actions or upon suspension or withdrawal of the Bank’s credit rating. Currently, there are no circumstances that would trigger these provisions of the agreements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The Company does not offset assets and liabilities under master netting agreements for financial reporting purposes. Information on interest rate swaps subject to these agreements is as follows at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017
				Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet								June 30, 2019
	Gross Amounts Recognized					Derivative Instruments				Collateral Pledged			Net Amount					Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet		Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
				Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet											Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet				Gross Amounts Recognized				Derivative Instruments		Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Derivative assets	$	8,686		$	—		$	8,686		$	(6,814	)	$	(1,539	)	$	333	$	1,616		$	—	$	1,616		$	(1,616	)	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities	(18,570		)	—			(18,570		)	6,814			11,756			—		(17,721		)	—		(17,721		)	1,616			16,105		—
	$	(9,884	)	$	—		$	(9,884	)	$	—		$	10,217		$	333	$	(16,105	)	$	—	$	(16,105	)	$	—		$	16,105	$	—

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019


	December 31, 2016
				Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet										December 31, 2018
	Gross Amounts Recognized					Derivative Instruments				Collateral Pledged				Net Amount						Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
				Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet																Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet					Gross Amounts Recognized						Derivative Instruments			Collateral Pledged				Net Amount
Derivative assets	$	29,849		$	—		Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet	$	29,849		$	(27,485	)		$	—		$	2,364		$	18,297	Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet		$	—			$	18,297		$	(5,264	)		$	(13,129	)		$	(96	)
Derivative liabilities	(51,362		)	—			(51,362		)	27,485				23,796			(81		)	(6,991		)	—			(6,991		)		5,264			436				(1,291		)
	$	(21,513	)	$	—		$	(21,513	)	$	—			$	23,796		$	2,283		$	11,306		$	—		$	11,306			$	—		$	(12,693	)		$	(1,387	)

The difference between the amounts reported for interest rate swaps subject to master netting agreements and the total fair value of interest rate contract derivative financial instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheets is related to interest rate contracts entered into with borrowers not subject to master netting agreements.

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the Company had pledged ~~investment securities available for sale with a carrying amount~~net financial collateral of ~~$40 million and cash on deposit of $2~~$17.3 million as collateral for interest rate swaps in a liability ~~position. $2 million of financial collateral was pledged by counterparties to the Company for interest rate swaps in an asset position.~~position that are not centrally cleared. The amount of collateral required to be posted varies based on the settlement value of outstanding swaps and in some cases may include initial margin requirements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Note 8 Stockholders’ Equity

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Changes in ~~AOCI~~other comprehensive income are summarized as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,																		Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017									2016									2019									2018
	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale:
Net unrealized holding gain arising during the period	$	14,144		$	(5,587	)	$	8,557		$	5,316		$	(2,100	)	$	3,216
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period																			$	31,737		$	(8,410	)	$	23,326		$	(17,831	)	$	4,725		$	(13,106	)
Amounts reclassified to gain on investment securities available for sale, net	(26,931		)	10,638			(16,293		)	(3,008		)	1,188			(1,820		)	(3,914		)	1,037			(2,877		)	(2,551		)	676			(1,875		)
Net change in unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale	(12,787		)	5,051			(7,736		)	2,308			(912		)	1,396			27,823			(7,373		)	20,449			(20,382		)	5,401			(14,981		)
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	(281		)	111			(170		)	8,356			(3,301		)	5,055			(50,637		)	13,419			(37,218		)	13,396			(3,550		)	9,846
Amounts reclassified to interest expense on borrowings	2,001			(791		)	1,210			3,741			(1,477		)	2,264			(1,688		)	447			(1,241		)	(728		)	193			(535		)
Net change in unrealized losses on derivative instruments	1,720			(680		)	1,040			12,097			(4,778		)	7,319			(52,325		)	13,866			(38,459		)	12,668			(3,357		)	9,311
Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(11,067	)	$	4,371		$	(6,696	)	$	14,405		$	(5,690	)	$	8,715
Other comprehensive loss																			$	(24,502	)	$	6,493		$	(18,010	)	$	(7,714	)	$	2,044		$	(5,670	)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Before Tax Tax Effect Net of Tax Before Tax Tax Effect Net of Tax
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale:

Net unrealized holding gain arising during the period $ 54,258
$ (21,432 ) $ 32,826
$ 88,413
$ (34,923 ) $ 53,490
Amounts reclassified to gain on investment securities available for sale, net (29,194 ) 11,532
(17,662 ) (10,065 ) 3,975
(6,090 )
Net change in unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale 25,064
(9,900 ) 15,164
78,348
(30,948 ) 47,400
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments:
Net unrealized holding loss arising during the period (13,780 ) 5,443
(8,337 ) (57,765 ) 22,817
(34,948 )
Amounts reclassified to interest expense on borrowings 7,463
(2,948 ) 4,515
13,050
(5,154 ) 7,896
Net change in unrealized losses on derivative instruments (6,317 ) 2,495
(3,822 ) (44,715 ) 17,663
(27,052 )
Other comprehensive income $ 18,747
$ (7,405 ) $ 11,342
$ 33,633
$ (13,285 ) $ 20,348

3429

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019									2018
	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	$	61,147		$	(16,204	)	$	44,943		$	(55,007	)	$	14,577		$	(40,430	)
Amounts reclassified to gain on investment securities available for sale, net	(8,231		)	2,181			(6,050		)	(3,527		)	935			(2,592		)
Net change in unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale	52,916			(14,023		)	38,893			(58,534		)	15,512			(43,022		)
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	(78,766		)	20,873			(57,893		)	40,325			(10,686		)	29,639
Amounts reclassified to interest expense on borrowings	(4,411		)	1,169			(3,242		)	211			(56		)	155
Net change in unrealized losses on derivative instruments	(83,177		)	22,042			(61,135		)	40,536			(10,742		)	29,794
Other comprehensive loss	$	(30,261	)	$	8,019		$	(22,242	)	$	(17,998	)	$	4,770		$	(13,228	)

The categories of AOCI and changes therein are presented below for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Unrealized Gains on
Investment Securities
Available for Sale

Unrealized Losses
on Derivative
Instruments
Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 47,057
$ (5,810 ) $ 41,247
Other comprehensive income 15,164
(3,822 ) 11,342
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 62,221
$ (9,632 ) $ 52,589

Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 41,535
$ (19,353 ) $ 22,182
Other comprehensive income 47,400
(27,052 ) 20,348
Balance at September 30, 2016 $ 88,935
$ (46,405 ) $ 42,530



	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Securities Available for Sale			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	4,194		$	679		$	4,873
Other comprehensive loss	38,893			(61,135		)	(22,242		)
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	43,087		$	(60,456	)	$	(17,369	)

Balance at December 31, 2017	$	56,534		$	(1,548	)	$	54,986
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standards	9,187			(285		)	8,902
Other comprehensive loss	(43,022		)	29,794			(13,228		)
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	22,699		$	27,961		$	50,660

Other

In January 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150 million of its outstanding common stock. Any repurchases will be made in accordance with applicable securities laws from time to time in open market or private transactions. The program may be commenced, suspended or discontinued without prior notice.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

Note 9 Equity Based and Other Compensation Plans

Share Awards

Unvested share awards

~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company granted 618,306~~A summary of activity related to unvested share awards ~~under~~follows for the ~~2014 Plan. All~~periods indicated:



	Number of Share Awards		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested share awards outstanding, December 31, 2018	1,186,238		$	38.86
Granted	582,353		36.57
Vested	(533,125	)	37.67
Canceled or forfeited	(115,825	)	39.11
Unvested share awards outstanding, June 30, 2019	1,119,641		$	38.21

Unvested share awards outstanding, December 31, 2017	1,108,477		$	36.06
Granted	640,828		40.34
Vested	(513,948	)	34.68
Canceled or forfeited	(48,907	)	38.21
Unvested share awards outstanding, June 30, 2018	1,186,450		$	38.88

Unvested share awards are generally valued at the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. All shares granted prior to 2019 vest in equal annual installments over a period of three years from the date of grant. ~~The~~All shares granted ~~were valued at~~in 2019 to Company employees vest in equal annual installments over a period of four years from the date of grant. Shares granted to the Company's Board of Directors vest over a period of one year. The following table summarizes the closing price of the ~~Company’s common~~Company's stock on the date of grant ~~ranging from $33.21 to $40.84,~~for shares granted and ~~had an~~the aggregate grant date fair value of ~~$24.9 million.~~ shares vesting for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data):



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018
Range of the closing price on date of grant	$34.23 - $36.65		$40.28 - $42.80
Aggregate grant date fair value of shares vesting	$	20,083	$	17,825

The total unrecognized compensation cost of ~~$26.7~~$32.3 million for all unvested share awards outstanding at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of ~~1.98~~2.42 years.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 644,888 unvested share awards under the 2014 Plan. All of the shares vest in equal annual installments over a period of three years from the date of grant. The shares granted were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, ranging from $29.78 to $33.76, and had an aggregate fair value of $20.0 million.

Executive share-based awards

Certain of the Company's executives are eligible to receive annual awards of RSUs and PSUs (collectively, the "share units"). Annual awards of RSUs represent a fixed number of shares and vest on December 31st in equal tranches over three ~~years.~~years for awards issued prior to 2019 and over four years for awards issued in 2019. PSUs are initially granted based on a target value. The number of PSUs that ultimately vest at the end of ~~a three-year~~the performance measurement period will be based on the achievement of performance criteria pre-established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The performance criteria established for the PSUs granted in ~~2017~~2019, 2018 and ~~2016~~2017 include both performance and market conditions. Upon vesting, the share units will be converted to common stock on a one-for-one basis, or may be settled in cash at the Company's option. The share units will accumulate dividends declared on the Company's common stock from the date of grant to be paid subsequent to vesting.

The ~~first tranche~~Company has cash settled all tranches of RSUs ~~granted~~and PSUs that have vested onthrough December 31, ~~2016. The Company cash settled these share units in the amount of $0.8 million during the first quarter of 2017.~~2018. As a result of ~~this~~the previous cash ~~settlement,~~settlements, all RSUs and PSUs have been determined to be liability instruments and ~~will be~~are remeasured at fair

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

value each reporting period until the awards are settled. The RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company's common stock at the reporting date. The PSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company's common stock at the reporting date net of a discount related to any applicable market conditions, considering the probability of meeting the defined performance conditions. Compensation cost related to PSUs is recognized during the performance period based on the probable outcome of the respective performance conditions.

~~During~~A summary of activity related to executive share-based awards for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, 47,848 RSUs and 47,848 PSUs were granted. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, 57,873 RSUs and 57,873 PSUs were granted.~~ periods indicated follows:



	RSU	PSU
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, December 31, 2018	90,612	99,874
Granted	73,062	73,062
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, June 30, 2019	163,674	172,936

Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, December 31, 2017	91,171	105,721
Granted	52,026	52,026
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, June 30, 2018	143,197	157,747

The total liability for ~~the share units~~these executive share-based awards was ~~$2.6~~$4.0 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The total unrecognized compensation cost of ~~$5.3~~$7.2 million for ~~these share units~~unvested executive share-based awards at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of ~~2.18~~2.28 years.

Incentiveawards

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The~~618,306~~ ~~unvested share awards granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as discussed above, included~~ ~~25,321~~ unvested share awards granted to certain of the Company's executives based on the achievement of performance criteria pre-established by the Compensation Committee for the year ended December 31, 2016.

~~Incentiveawards~~

~~Beginning in 2017, the~~ Company's annual incentive compensation arrangements for employees other than those eligible for the executive share-based awards discussed above provide for settlement through a combination of cash payments and unvested share awards following the end of the annual performance period. The dollar value of share awards to be granted is based on the achievement of performance criteria established in the incentive arrangements. The number of shares of common stock to be awarded is variable based on the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of grant; therefore, these awards are initially classified as liability instruments, with compensation cost recognized from the beginning of the performance period. ~~The~~Awards related to performance periods prior to 2019, included in the summary of activity related to unvested share awards above, vest overthree years and awards related to the 2019 performance period will vest in equal installments over a period of ~~three~~four years from the date of grant. The total liability for ~~the~~ incentive share awards for the 2019 performance period was ~~$1.2~~$0.4 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The related total unrecognized compensation cost of ~~$5.3~~$3.6 million for these incentive share awards at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of ~~3.25~~4.51 years. The accrued liability and unrecognized compensation cost are based on management's current estimate of the likely outcome of the performance criteria established in the incentive arrangements and may differ from actual results.

The 582,353 unvested share awards granted during the six months ended June 30, 2019, as discussed above, included 60,290 unvested share awards granted under the Company's annual incentive compensation arrangements based on the achievement of established performance criteria for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

Option Awards

A summary of activity related to stock option awards for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and 2018 follows:



	Number of Option Awards		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2018	964,840		$	26.53
Exercised	(3,910	)	11.14
Canceled or forfeited	(1,960	)	63.74
Option awards outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2019	958,970		$	26.52

Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2017	1,270,688		$	26.93
Exercised	(291,689	)	26.94
Option awards outstanding, June 30, 2018	978,999		$	27.07

Number of
Option
Awards

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2016 3,602,076
$ 26.74
Exercised (2,304,108 ) 26.70
Option awards outstanding and exercisable, September 30, 2017 1,297,968
$ 26.81

~~Activity related to stock option awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was not significant.~~ The intrinsic value of options exercised ~~and the related tax benefit~~ was ~~$25.3~~$0.1 million and ~~$3.8~~$4.6 million, respectively, during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019 and 2018. The related tax benefit of options exercised was immaterial for both the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Note 10 Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Following is a description of the methodologies used to estimate the fair values of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements are typically classified.

Investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities—Fair value measurements are based on quoted prices in active markets when available; these measurements are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. These securities typically include U.S. Treasury securities and certain preferred stocks. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, quoted prices of identical securities in less active markets, discounted cash flow techniques, or matrix pricing models. These securities are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and include U.S. Government agency securities, U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise MBS, preferred stock investments for which level 1 valuations are not available, corporate debt securities, non-mortgage asset-backed securities, single family rental real estate-backed securities, certain private label residential MBS and CMOs, private label commercial MBS, collateralized loan obligations and state and municipal obligations. Pricing of these securities is generally primarily spread driven. Observable inputs that may impact the valuation of these securities include benchmark yield curves, credit spreads, reported trades, dealer quotes, bids, issuer spreads, current rating, historical constant prepayment rates, historical voluntary prepayment rates, structural and waterfall features of individual securities, published collateral data, and for certain securities, historical constant default rates and default severities. Investment securities available for sale generally classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy include certain private label MBS and trust preferred securities. The Company typically values these securities using third-party proprietary pricing models, primarily discounted cash flow valuation techniques, which incorporate both observable and unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs that may impact the valuation of

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

these securities include risk adjusted discount rates, projected prepayment rates, projected default rates and projected loss severity.

The Company uses third-party pricing services in determining fair value measurements for investment securities. To obtain an understanding of the methodologies and assumptions used, management reviews written documentation provided by the pricing services, conducts interviews with valuation desk personnel and reviews model results and detailed assumptions used to value selected securities as considered necessary. Management has established a robust price challenge process that includes a review by the treasury front office of all prices provided on a monthly basis. Any price evidencing unexpected month over month fluctuations or deviations from expectations is challenged. If considered necessary to resolve any discrepancies, a price will be obtained from an additional independent valuation source. The Company does not typically adjust the prices provided, other than through this established challenge process. The results of price challenges are subject to review by executive management. The Company has also established a quarterly process whereby prices provided by its primary pricing service for

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

a sample of securities are validated. Any price discrepancies are resolved based on careful consideration of the assumptions and inputs employed by each of the pricing sources.

Servicing rights—Commercial servicing rights are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology incorporating contractually specified servicing fees and market based assumptions about prepayments, discount rates, default rates and costs of servicing. Prepayment and default assumptions are based on historical industry data for loans with similar characteristics. Assumptions about costs of servicing are based on market convention. Discount rates are based on rates of return implied by observed trades of underlying loans in the secondary market. Fair value of residential MSRs is estimated using a discounted cash flow technique that incorporates market‑based assumptions including estimated prepayment speeds, contractual servicing fees, cost to service, discount rates, escrow account earnings, ancillary income, and estimated defaults. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs and the limited availability of market pricing, servicing rights are classified as level 3.

Derivative financial instruments—Fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using widely accepted discounted cash flow modeling techniques. These discounted cash flow models use projections of future cash payments and receipts that are discounted at mid-market rates. Observable inputs that may impact the valuation of these instruments include LIBOR swap rates and LIBOR forward yield curves. These fair value measurements are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

The following tables present assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017								June 30, 2019
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	24,957	$	—	$	—	$	24,957	$	50,213	$	—		$	—	$	50,213
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	—		2,348,687		—		2,348,687		—		2,227,795			—		2,227,795
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	—		139,220		—		139,220		—		381,104			—		381,104
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	—		467,061		60,797		527,858		—		1,369,656			25,526		1,395,182
Private label commercial MBS	—		1,153,601		—		1,153,601		—		1,557,953			—		1,557,953
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	—		572,948		—		572,948		—		392,306			—		392,306
Collateralized loan obligations	—		700,319		—		700,319		—		1,198,282			—		1,198,282
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	—		82,637		—		82,637		—		157,817			—		157,817
Preferred stocks	70,038		678		—		70,716
State and municipal obligations	—		677,015		—		677,015		—		279,327			—		279,327
SBA securities	—		586,675		—		586,675		—		421,773			—		421,773
Other debt securities	—		3,815		5,024		8,839		—		—			4,781		4,781
Marketable equity securities									62,175		—			—		62,175
Servicing rights	—		—		30,136		30,136		—		—			9,435		9,435
Derivative assets	—		28,334		—		28,334		—		41,405			—		41,405
Total assets at fair value	$	94,995	$	6,760,990	$	95,957	$	6,951,942	$	112,388	$	8,027,418		$	39,742	$	8,179,548
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	27,076	$	—	$	27,076	$	—	$	(19,251	)	$	—	$	(19,251	)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	27,076	$	—	$	27,076	$	—	$	(19,251	)	$	—	$	(19,251	)

3834

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019



	December 31, 2018
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	39,873	$	—		$	—	$	39,873
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	—		1,897,474			—		1,897,474
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	—		374,787			—		374,787
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	—		1,499,514			34,684		1,534,198
Private label commercial MBS	—		1,485,716			—		1,485,716
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	—		402,458			—		402,458
Collateralized loan obligations	—		1,235,198			—		1,235,198
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	—		204,067			—		204,067
State and municipal obligations	—		398,429			—		398,429
SBA securities	—		519,313			—		519,313
Other debt securities	—		—			4,846		4,846
Marketable securities	60,519		—			—		60,519
Servicing rights	—		—			9,525		9,525
Derivative assets	—		29,615			—		29,615
Total assets at fair value	$	100,392	$	8,046,571		$	49,055	$	8,196,018
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	(23,874	)	$	—	$	(23,874	)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	(23,874	)	$	—	$	(23,874	)

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2016
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Investment securities available for sale:

U.S. Treasury securities $ 5,005
$ —
$ —
$ 5,005
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS —
1,527,242
—
1,527,242
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS —
124,586
—
124,586
Private label residential MBS and CMOs —
254,488
120,610
375,098
Private label commercial MBS —
1,187,624
—
1,187,624
Single family rental real estate-backed securities —
861,251
—
861,251
Collateralized loan obligations —
487,296
—
487,296
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities —
186,736
—
186,736
Preferred stocks 86,890
1,313
—
88,203
State and municipal obligations —
698,546
—
698,546
SBA securities —
523,906
—
523,906
Other debt securities —
3,519
4,572
8,091
Servicing rights —
—
27,159
27,159
Derivative assets —
50,232
—
50,232
Total assets at fair value $ 91,895
$ 5,906,739
$ 152,341
$ 6,150,975
Derivative liabilities $ —
$ 61,562
$ —
$ 61,562
Total liabilities at fair value $ —
$ 61,562
$ —
$ 61,562

~~There were no transfers of financial assets between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~

The following table reconciles changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016

Private Label
Residential
MBS

Other Debt
Securities
Servicing Rights
Private Label
Residential
MBS

Other Debt
Securities
Servicing Rights
Balance at beginning of period $ 108,790
$ 4,923
$ 29,128
$ 131,156
$ 4,292
$ 24,891
Gains (losses) for the period included in:
Net income 24,146
—
(1,330 ) —
—
(2,369 )
Other comprehensive income (24,668 ) 101
—
337
22
—
Discount accretion 2,332
59
—
1,404
36
—
Purchases or additions —
—
2,338
—
—
2,194
Sales (40,732 ) —
—
—
—
—
Settlements (9,071 ) (59 ) —
(5,594 ) (26 ) —
Transfers into level 3 —
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers out of level 3 —
—
—
—
—
—
Balance at end of period $ 60,797
$ 5,024
$ 30,136
$ 127,303
$ 4,324
$ 24,716

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019									2018
	Private Label Residential MBS			Other Debt Securities			Servicing Rights			Private Label Residential MBS			Other Debt Securities			Servicing Rights
Balance at beginning of period	$	27,904		$	4,818		$	9,585		$	44,120		$	5,714		$	33,432
Gains (losses) for the period included in:
Net income	196			—			(486		)	—			—			(1,868		)
Other comprehensive income	(800		)	(32		)	—			(963		)	(91		)	—
Discount accretion	941			55			—			714			182			—
Purchases or additions	—			—			336			—			—			4,351
Sales	(561		)	—			—			—			—			—
Settlements	(2,154		)	(60		)				(3,307		)	(224		)	—
Transfers into level 3	—			—			—			—			—			—
Transfers out of level 3	—			—			—			—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	25,526		$	4,781		$	9,435		$	40,564		$	5,581		$	35,915
Change in unrealized gains or losses included in OCI for assets held at the end of the reporting period	$	(320	)	$	(32	)				$	(933	)	$	(91	)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,																		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017									2016									2019									2018
	Private Label Residential MBS			Other Debt Securities			Servicing Rights			Private Label Residential MBS			Other Debt Securities			Servicing Rights			Private Label Residential MBS			Other Debt Securities			Servicing Rights			Private Label Residential MBS			Other Debt Securities			Servicing Rights
Balance at beginning of period	$	120,610		$	4,572		$	27,159		$	140,883		$	4,532		$	20,017		$	34,684		$	4,846		$	9,525		$	52,214		$	5,329		$	30,737
Gains (losses) for the period included in:
Net income	24,146			—			(4,273		)	—			—			(5,983		)	1,630			—			(1,148		)	1,319			—			(1,621		)
Other comprehensive income	(25,651		)	469			—			(190		)	(245		)	—			(4,064		)	(67		)	—			(3,461		)	287			—
Discount accretion	5,208			248			—			4,485			88			—			3,044			70			—			1,585			213			—
Purchases or additions	—			—			7,250			—			—			10,682			—			—			1,058			—			—			6,799
Sales	(40,732		)	—			—			—			—			—			(5,531		)	—			—			(5,120		)	—			—
Settlements	(22,784		)	(265		)	—			(17,875		)	(51		)	—			(4,237		)	(68		)	—			(5,973		)	(248		)	—
Transfers into level 3	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Transfers out of level 3	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	60,797		$	5,024		$	30,136		$	127,303		$	4,324		$	24,716		$	25,526		$	4,781		$	9,435		$	40,564		$	5,581		$	35,915
Change in unrealized gains or losses included in OCI for assets held at the end of the reporting period																			$	(731	)	$	(67	)				$	(1,992	)	$	287

Gains on private label residential MBS recognized in net income during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and 2018 are included in the consolidated statement of income line item ~~"Gain~~"Gain on investment securities, ~~available for sale, net.~~net." Changes in the fair value of servicing rights are included in the consolidated statement of income line item ~~“Other~~“Other non-interest ~~income.~~income.” Changes in fair value include changes due to valuation assumptions, primarily discount rates and prepayment speeds, as well as other changes such as runoff and the passage of time. The amount of net unrealized ~~losses~~gains (losses) included in earnings for the ~~nine~~ six

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 and 2016 that were~~2019 related to servicing rights held at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 was insignificant; and ~~2016 totaled~~ approximately ~~$0.8~~$1.1 million ~~and $1.7 million, respectively, and~~ for the six months ended June 30, 2018 related to servicing rights held at June 30, 2018. The net unrealized gains (losses)were primarily due to changes in discount rates and prepayment speeds.

Securities for which fair value measurements are categorized in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 consisted of pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $5 million and private label residential MBS and CMOs with a fair value of ~~$61~~$26 million. The trust preferred securities are not material to the Company’s financial statements. Private label residential MBS consisted of senior and mezzanine tranches collateralized by prime fixed rate and hybrid 1-4 single family residential mortgages originated before ~~2005, some of which contain option-arm features.~~2005. Substantially all of these securities have variable rate coupons. Weighted average subordination levels at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 were ~~16.4%~~19.4% and ~~10.4%~~14.4% for investment grade and non-investment grade securities, respectively.

The following table provides information about the valuation techniques and unobservable inputs used in the valuation of private label residential MBS and CMOs falling within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

Fair Value at

Valuation Technique

Unobservable

Input

Range (Weighted

Average)

Fair Value at

Valuation Technique

Unobservable

Input

Range (Weighted

Average)

September 30, 2017

June 30, 2019

Investment grade

34,245

Discounted cash flow

Voluntary prepayment rate

6.60% - 25.60% (15.92%)

13,199

Discounted cash flow

Voluntary prepayment rate

5.00% - 27.20% (15.70%)

Probability of default

0.13% - 4.04% (1.36%)

Probability of default

0.10% - 10.00% (2.09%)

Loss severity

15.00% - 75.00% (33.10%)

Loss severity

15.00% - 100.00% (41.05%)

Discount rate

1.88% - 7.43% (3.48%)

Discount rate

2.40% - 6.15% (3.42%)

Non-investment grade

26,552

Discounted cash flow

Voluntary prepayment rate

1.10% - 29.30% (15.35%)

12,327

Discounted cash flow

Voluntary prepayment rate

7.10% - 30.00% (15.48%)

Probability of default

0.13% - 4.15% (1.51%)

Probability of default

0.00% - 5.56% (2.26%)

Loss severity

15.00% - 95.00% (32.96%)

Loss severity

15.00% - 100.00% (29.87%)

Discount rate

1.35% - 9.43% (5.89%)

Discount rate

1.59% - 12.15% (4.61%)

The significant unobservable inputs impacting the fair value measurement of private label residential MBS and CMOs include voluntary prepayment rates, probability of default, loss severity given default and discount rates. Generally, increases in

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

probability of default, loss severity or discount rates would result in a lower fair value measurement. Alternatively, decreases in probability of default, loss severity or discount rates would result in a higher fair value measurement. For securities with less favorable credit characteristics, decreases in voluntary prepayment speeds may be interpreted as a deterioration in the overall credit quality of the underlying collateral and as such, lead to lower fair value measurements. The fair value measurements of those securities with higher levels of subordination will be less sensitive to changes in these unobservable inputs other than discount rates, while securities with lower levels of subordination will show a higher degree of sensitivity to changes in these unobservable inputs other than discount rates. Generally, a change in the assumption used for probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for loss severity given default and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for voluntary prepayment rate.

The following table provides information about the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of servicing rights as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

Fair Value at Valuation Technique
Unobservable
Input

Range (Weighted
Average)
September 30, 2017
Residential MSRs $ 18,006
Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate 2.76% - 29.96% (12.88%)
Discount rate 9.50% - 9.58% (9.51%)

Commercial servicing rights $ 12,130
Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate 0.09% - 9.99% (7.81%)
Discount rate 8.12% - 14.57% (12.48%)



	Fair Value at		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
	June 30, 2019		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Commercial servicing rights	$	9,435	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment rate	0.60% - 19.91% (14.11%)
				Discount rate	3.61% - 16.81% (11.28%)

Increases in prepayment rates or discount rates would result in lower fair value measurements and decreases in prepayment rates or discount rates would result in higher fair value measurements. Although the prepayment rate and the discount rate are not directly interrelated, they generally move in opposite directions.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

Following is a description of the methodologies used to estimate the fair values of assets and liabilities that may be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements are typically classified.

Impaired loans, OREOand other repossessed assets—The carrying amount of collateral dependent impaired loans is typically based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which may be real estate ~~taxi medallions,~~ or other business assets, less estimated costs to sell. The carrying value of OREO is initially measured based on the fair value of the real estate acquired in foreclosure and subsequently adjusted to the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell. Fair values of real estate collateral and OREO are typically based on third-party real estate appraisals which utilize market and income approaches to valuation incorporating both observable and unobservable inputs. When current appraisals are not available, the Company may use brokers’ price opinions, home price indices or other available information about changes in real estate market conditions to adjust the latest appraised value available. These adjustments to appraised values may be subjective and involve significant management judgment. The fair value of repossessed assets ~~other than taxi medallions,~~ or collateral consisting of other business assets may be based on third-party appraisals or internal analyses that use market approaches to valuation incorporating primarily unobservable inputs.

The fair value of New York City taxi medallions is based primarily on an internal analysis that utilizes an income approach to valuation. This analysis utilizes data obtained from the NYTLC about the fleet in general and in some cases, our portfolio specifically, and management's assumptions, based on external data when available, about revenues, costs and expenses, to estimate the value that can reasonably be supported by the cash flow generating capacity of a medallion. We further discount the results of this analysis in recognition of estimated selling costs and declining trends in medallion values. We also consider prices of recent medallion transfers as published by the NYTLC; however, the market for taxi medallions is illiquid and information about the circumstances underlying observed transfers is unavailable, therefore, information about recent transfers is not considered sufficient to establish a reliable estimate of value. The Company's medallion valuations fall within the range of published transfer prices over the last six months. Taxi medallions in municipalities other than New York City are generally valued based on published information about recent transfer prices; the valuation of these assets did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements for any period presented as the taxi medallion portfolio is heavily concentrated in New York City.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Fair value measurements related to collateral dependent impaired loans, OREO and other repossessed assets are classified within ~~level~~levels 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following tables present the carrying value of assets for which non-recurring changes in fair value have been recorded for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017								Losses from Fair Value Changes						June 30, 2019								Losses from Fair Value Changes
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
OREO and repossessed assets	$	—	$	—	$	5,520	$	5,520	$	(515	)	$	(1,534	)	$	—	$	—	$	1,557	$	1,557	$	(203	)	$	(221	)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	107,173	$	107,173	$	(35,106	)	$	(58,073	)	$	—	$	—	$	15,385	$	15,385	$	(529	)	$	(279	)


	September 30, 2016								Losses from Fair Value Changes						June 30, 2018								Losses from Fair Value Changes
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Three Months Ended September 30, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018			Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
OREO and repossessed assets	$	—	$	—	$	7,923	$	7,923	$	(372	)	$	740		$	—	$	1,530	$	432	$	1,962	$	(396	)	$	(1,801	)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	59,678	$	59,678	$	(10,623	)	$	(18,873	)	$	—	$	26,604	$	54,089	$	80,693	$	(10,966	)	$	(14,157	)

Included in the tables above are impaired taxi medallion loans with carrying values of ~~$90.1 million and $39.6~~$66.1 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively,~~2018. Losses from fair value changes included in the ~~majority of which were in New York City. Losses of $54.3~~tables above include $12.7 million ~~and $10.2 million were~~ recognized on impaired taxi medallion loans during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018. In addition, OREO and ~~2016, respectively.~~

~~Decreases in the value of medallions are largely driven by decreases in revenues generated from the medallions. Inputs that had the most significant impact on the valuation of New York City~~repossessed assets reported above included repossessed taxi medallions with carrying values of $1.5 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 are presented below:~~2018. Losses of $0.1 million and $0.6 million were recognized on repossessed taxi medallions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.



	~~Average Amount~~
~~Average fare per trip~~	~~$16.12~~
~~Number of trips per shift~~	~~15.4~~
~~Days worked per month~~	~~25.6~~

4238

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements are classified at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):



		June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Level	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	1	$	442,833	$	442,833	$	382,073	$	382,073
Investment securities	1/2/3	8,138,708		8,139,257		8,166,878		8,167,127
Non-marketable equity securities	2	289,789		289,789		267,052		267,052
Loans held for sale	2	224,759		232,000		36,992		39,931
Loans	3	22,479,708		22,815,851		21,867,077		21,868,258
Derivative assets	2	41,405		41,405		29,615		29,615
Liabilities:
Demand, savings and money market deposits	2	$	16,841,684	$	16,841,684	$	16,654,465	$	16,654,465
Time deposits	2	7,080,716		7,093,055		6,819,758		6,820,355
Federal funds purchased	2	99,000		99,000		175,000		175,000
FHLB advances	2	5,331,000		5,353,836		4,796,000		4,810,446
Notes and other borrowings	2	403,661		442,782		402,749		416,142
Derivative liabilities	2	19,251		19,251		23,874		23,874

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Level Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents 1 $ 292,601
$ 292,601
$ 448,313
$ 448,313
Investment securities available for sale 1/2/3 6,893,472
6,893,472
6,073,584
6,073,584
Investment securities held to maturity 3 10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Non-marketable equity securities 2 270,239
270,239
284,272
284,272
Loans held for sale 2 31,507
35,113
41,198
45,833
Loans:
Covered 3 533,128
997,376
611,942
1,200,291
Non-covered 3 19,918,729
19,906,579
18,630,499
18,713,495
FDIC Indemnification asset 3 349,617
168,415
515,933
256,691
Derivative assets 2 28,334
28,334
50,232
50,232
Liabilities:
Demand, savings and money market deposits 2 $ 14,889,543
$ 14,889,543
$ 13,735,248
$ 13,735,248
Time deposits 2 6,333,701
6,335,324
5,755,642
5,759,787
FHLB advances 2 4,871,000
4,876,017
5,239,348
5,244,188
Notes and other borrowings 2 402,828
427,748
402,809
403,733
Derivative liabilities 2 27,076
27,076
61,562
61,562

~~The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments, other than those described above:~~

~~Cash and cash equivalents~~

~~The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to their short-term nature and generally negligible credit risk.~~

~~Investment securities held to maturity~~

~~Investment securities held to maturity includes one bond issued by the State of Israel, with fair value obtained from a third party pricing service.~~

~~Non-marketable equity securities~~

Non-marketable equity securities include FHLB and FRB stock. There is no market for these securities, which can be liquidated only by redemption by the issuer. These securities are valued at par, which has historically represented the redemption price and is therefore considered to approximate fair value.

~~Loans held for sale~~

The fair value of the portion of small business loans guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies being held for sale is estimated using pricing on recent sales of similar loans by the Company in active markets.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

~~Covered loans~~

Fair values are estimated based on a discounted cash flow analysis. Estimates of future cash flows incorporate various factors that may include the type of loan and related collateral, estimated collateral values, estimated voluntary prepayment rates, estimated default probability and loss severity given default, whether the interest rate is fixed or variable, term of loan and whether or not the loan is amortizing. The fair values of loans accounted for in pools are estimated on a pool basis. Discount rates for residential loans are based on observable fixed income market data for products with similar credit characteristics.

~~Non-covered loans~~

Fair values of residential loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis with discount rates based on yields at which similar loans are trading in the secondary market, which reflect assumptions about credit risk. Fair values of commercial and consumer loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis with discount rates based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The ALLL related to commercial and consumer loans is considered a reasonable estimate of the required adjustment to fair value to reflect the impact of credit risk. This estimate may not represent an exit value as defined in ASC 820.

~~FDIC indemnification asset~~

The fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset has been estimated using a discounted cash flow technique incorporating assumptions about the timing and amount of future projected cash payments from the FDIC related to the resolution of covered assets. The factors that impact estimates of future cash flows are similar to those impacting estimated cash flows from covered loans. The discount rate is determined by adjusting the risk free rate to incorporate uncertainty in the estimate of the timing and amount of future cash flows and illiquidity.

~~Deposits~~

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow technique based on rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

~~FHLB advances~~

~~Fair value is estimated by discounting contractual future cash flows using the current rate at which borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities could be obtained by the Company.~~

~~Senior notes~~

~~Fair value is estimated based on quoted prices of identical securities in less active markets.~~

Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies

The Company issues off-balance sheet financial instruments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to fund loans, unfunded commitments under existing lines of credit, and commercial and standby letters of credit. These commitments expose the Company to varying degrees of credit and market risk which are essentially the same as those involved in extending loans to customers, and are subject to the same credit policies used in underwriting loans. Collateral may be obtained based on the Company’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. Unfunded commitments under lines of credit include $10.0 million available under non-cancellable commitments in effect at the date of the FSB Acquisition, which are covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement if prescribed conditions are met.

Commitments to fund loans

These are agreements to lend funds to customers as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to fund loans generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Many of these commitments are expected to expire without being funded and, therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit include commercial, commercial real estate, home equity and consumer lines of credit to existing customers. Some of these commitments may mature without being fully funded.

Commercial and standby letters of credit

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These letters of credit are primarily issued to support trade transactions or guarantee arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

June 30, 2019

Total lending related commitments outstanding at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 were as follows (in thousands):



Commitments to fund loans	$	450,898
Commitments to purchase loans	660,965
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit	2,950,555
Commercial and standby letters of credit	84,731
	$	4,147,149

Commitments to fund loans $ 417,943
Commitments to purchase loans 287,302
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit 2,361,922
Commercial and standby letters of credit 83,141
$ 3,150,308

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon advice of legal counsel, the likelihood is remote that the impact of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is intended to focus on significant matters impacting and changes in the financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes hereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and BKU's ~~2016~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2018 (the ~~"2016~~"2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K”).

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect the Company’s current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the historical performance of the Company or on the Company’s current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company that the future plans, estimates or expectations so contemplated will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to the Company’s operations, financial results, financial condition, business prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if the Company’s underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, the Company’s actual results may vary materially from those indicated in these statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the risk factors described in Part ~~II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q and in Part~~ I, Item 1A of the ~~2016~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Overview

Quarterly Highlights

In evaluating our financial performance, we consider the level of and trends in net interest income, the net interest margin, levels and composition of non-interest income and non-interest expense, performance ratios such as the return on average equity and return on average assets and asset quality ratios, ~~particularly for the non-covered portfolio,~~ including the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans, non-performing assets to total assets, and portfolio delinquency and charge-off trends. We consider growth in earning assets and deposits, trends in funding mix and cost of funds. We analyze these ratios and trends against our own historical performance, our budgeted performance and the financial condition and performance of comparable financial institutions.

Quarterly highlights include:

Net income for the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 was ~~$67.8~~$81.5 million, or ~~$0.62~~$0.81 per diluted share, compared to ~~$50.8~~$89.9 million, or ~~$0.47~~$0.82 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Non-loss share diluted earnings per share, as previously reported, for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018 was $0.59. For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~,2019 net income was ~~$196.5~~$147.4 million,, or ~~$1.79~~$1.45 per diluted share, compared to ~~$162.4~~$175.1 million,, or ~~$1.50~~$1.59 per diluted share, for

the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~.2018. Earnings for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 generated an annualized return on average stockholders' equity of ~~10.21%~~10.1% and an annualized return on average assets of ~~0.92%~~0.91%.

~~Net interest income~~For the quarter ended June 30, 2019, non-interest bearing demand deposits grew by $335 million, to 17.1% of total deposits at June 30, 2019 compared to 15.4% of total deposits at December 31, 2018. Total deposits increased by ~~$19.5 million to $241.3~~$243 million for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019. Non-interest bearing demand deposits grew by $478 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 while total deposits increased by $448 million.

Loans and leases, including equipment under operating lease, grew by $231 million during the quarter; loan and lease growth was $420 million excluding the transfer of $189 million of Pinnacle Public Finance loans to loans held for sale at June 30, 2019. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, excluding the transfer of Pinnacle loans to held for sale, loans and leases grew by $809 million.

Net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 decreased by $64.4 million from ~~$221.7~~$255.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. Interest income increased by $39.5 million, driven by increases in the average balances of loans and investment securities outstanding and an increase in the yield on interest earning assets. Interest expense increased by $19.9 million, driven by increases in average interest bearing liabilities and the cost of those liabilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net interest income increased by $68.6 million to $711.4 million from $642.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased to 3.62% for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 from 3.69% for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and 3.76% for the immediately preceding quarter ended June 30, 2017. Significant factors contributing to the decline in the net interest margin included the continued run-off of high-yielding covered loans and an increase in the cost of interest bearing liabilities.2018. The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was ~~3.69% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 3.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~Total interest earning assets increased by~~ ~~$613 million~~ ~~during the~~ ~~third quarter~~ of ~~2017. Non-covered loans and leases, including equipment under operating lease, grew by $384 million during the quarter. For the nine months ended~~

~~September 30, 2017, total interest earning assets increased by $1.9 billion and non-covered loans and leases grew by $1.3 billion.~~

~~Total deposits increased by $445 million~~2.52% for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019, compared to ~~$21.2 billion. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, total deposits increased by $1.7 billion.~~

At September 30, 2017, 96.7% of the non-covered commercial loan portfolio was rated "pass" and substantially all of the non-covered residential portfolio was current. The ratio of non-performing, non-covered loans to total non-covered loans was 1.00% and the ratio of non-performing, non-covered assets to total assets was 0.69% at September 30, 2017. Non-performing taxi medallion loans comprised 0.60% of total non-covered loans and 0.41% of total assets at September 30, 2017.

~~The provision for loan losses~~3.60% for the quarter ~~and nine months~~ ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 totaled $37.9 million and $63.6 million, respectively, compared to $24.4 million and $42.4 million, respectively, for the comparable periods of the prior year.~~2018. The most significant reason for ~~these increases~~the decline in net interest income and the provision for loan losses was the provision related to the taxi medallion portfolio as discussed further in the sections entitled "Asset Quality" and "Analysis of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses."

~~Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale,~~ net ~~totaled $26.9 million~~interest margin for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017. Substantially all of these gains related~~2019 compared to ~~sales of securities~~the quarter ended June 30, 2018 was the decrease in accretion on formerly covered ~~under the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement.~~residential loans.

The Company’s capital ratios exceeded all regulatory “well capitalized” guidelines, with a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.6%, CET1 and Tier 1 risk-based capital ratios of 11.9% and a Total risk-based capital ratio of 12.7% at September 30, 2017.

•

During the quarter ended June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 3.0 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $102 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 4.1 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $142 million, at a weighted average price of $34.44 per share.

Book value per common share grew to ~~$24.56~~$30.09 at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, a 7.8% increase~~2019 from ~~September 30, 2016. Tangible~~$29.49 at December 31, 2018 while tangible book value per common share increased ~~by 8.1%~~to $29.27 from $28.71 over the same ~~period,~~period.

Asset quality remained strong. The ratio of non-performing loans to ~~$23.83 at September 30, 2017.~~

~~Hurricanes Irma and Harvey~~

On September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall in Florida as a Category 4 hurricane affecting some areas of the state with significant flooding, wind damage and power outages. In addition, the Bank has a limited number of customers and collateral properties located in areas of Texas that were impacted by Hurricane Harvey during August, 2017.

~~Loan and Lease Portfolio~~

~~The Company has assessed the potential impact of the hurricanes on the value of collateral underlying our~~total loans was 0.61% and the ~~ability~~ratio of ~~borrowers~~non-performing assets to repay their obligations to the Bank. We believe the storms did not materially impact the ability of the substantial majority of our borrowers to repay their loans; however, uncertainty remains as to the ultimate impact of these events on the level of our loan losses and our results of operations.

In order to assess the impact of these hurricanes on our loan and lease portfolio, the Company performed an extensive review of loans with borrowers and/or collateral located in areas impacted by these storms. This analysis entailed the identification of and direct communication with borrowers located in impacted areas to determine the population of borrowers that may have been significantly impacted as well as consideration of factors including but not limited to level and type of insurance coverage, collateral and lien position and the financial condition of the borrower.

~~Commercial and commercial real estate loans with an aggregate UPB of approximately $7.1 billion~~total assets was 0.45% at ~~September~~June 30, 2017 were determined to be either made to borrowers that have significant business operations in or secured by collateral in areas that were potentially impacted by the hurricanes. Substantially all of those borrowers had been contacted as of October 3, 2017 and responses were considered in the determination of the ALLL as of September 30, 2017. As of October 31, 2017, commercial loans with an aggregate UPB of $22.2 million had been downgraded to criticized or classified status as a result of this analysis. Residential mortgage and other consumer loans with a carrying value of approximately $977 million at September 30, 2017, of which $315 million are covered loans, were determined to be either made to borrowers living in or secured by collateral in areas potentially impacted by the hurricanes; such loans with a carrying value of approximately $902 million, of which $312 million are covered loans, were determined to be in severely impacted areas, based on FEMA’s designation as “individual assistance” areas (“FEMA designated areas”). As of October 31, 2017, 74% of borrowers in FEMA designated areas had been contacted or property inspections conducted to assist in assessing the extent of potential damage to underlying collateral. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a loan loss provision of $5.4 million related to the impact of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey.

~~Impairment of Other Assets~~

Management also considered the impact of the hurricanes in our analysis of investment securities for OTTI, as well as our evaluation of potential impairment of our investment in equipment under operating lease, LIHTC partnerships, servicing assets and OREO at September 30, 2017 and determined there was no potentially material impact.

~~Fees, Operations and Facilities~~

To help those affected by Hurricane Irma, the Company waived or refunded certain fees such as overdraft, NSF and uncollected fees on consumer deposit accounts and late fees on residential mortgage, consumer and small business loans for consumer and small business customers in FEMA designated disaster areas for the period September 10, 2017 through September 30, 2017. In addition, certain residential mortgage and SBA loan customers impacted by the storm may be eligible for assistance in the form of temporary payment deferrals. Waived and refunded fees were not significant.

The Company’s operations and facilities were not materially impacted by Hurricane Irma. The Company continued operating throughout the storm although all of our Florida branch locations were closed from September 8, 2017 through September 11, 2017. The majority of our Florida branch locations and our Miami Lakes corporate headquarters re-opened on September 12, 2017 and all of our Florida branch locations re-opened prior to September 30, 2017.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded expenses of $0.6 million related primarily to facilities damage and employee relocation and assistance. We do not expect future expenses related to facilities damage to be material to the Company.

~~Community Assistance~~

To help with the recovery efforts of the communities in which we operate, work and live, BankUnited has made donations totaling $100,000 to non-profit organizations focused on recovery and relief efforts in Florida. These organizations were selected based on their ability to immediately deploy resources directly to targeted affected areas.2019.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on interest earning assets and interest incurred on interest bearing liabilities and is the primary driver of core earnings. Net interest income is impacted by the relative mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, the ratio of interest earning assets to total assets and of interest bearing liabilities to total funding sources, movements in market interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, levels of non-performing assets and pricing pressure from competitors.

The mix of interest earning assets is influenced by loan demand, market and competitive conditions in our primary lending markets and by management's continual assessment of the rate of return and relative risk associated with various classes of earning assets. The mix of interest bearing liabilities is influenced by the Company's liquidity profile, management's assessment of the desire for lower cost funding sources weighed against relationships with customers and growth ~~requirements~~expectations and is impacted by competition for deposits in the Company's markets and the availability and pricing of other sources of funds.

Net interest income is also impacted by the accounting for ACI loans acquired in conjunction with the FSB Acquisition. ACI loans were initially recorded at fair value, measured based on the present value of expected cash flows. The excess of expected cash flows over carrying value, known as accretable yield, is recognized as interest income over the lives of the underlying loans. The positive impact of accretion related to ACI loans on the net interest margin and the interest rate spread is expected to continue to decline as ACI loans comprise a declining percentage of total loans. The proportion of total loans represented by ACI loans is declining as the ACI loans are resolved and new loans are added to the portfolio. ACI loans represented 2.5% and 3.0% of total loans, including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. As this trend continues, assuming an otherwise stable interest rate environment, we would expect our net interest margin and interest rate spread to decrease as covered loans are resolved.

~~The impact of ACI loan accounting on net interest income makes it difficult to compare our net interest margin and interest rate spread to those reported by other financial institutions.~~

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, information about (i) average balances, the total dollar amount of taxable equivalent interest income from earning assets and the resultant average yields; (ii) average balances, the total dollar amount of interest expense on interest bearing liabilities and the resultant average rates; (iii) net interest income; (iv) the interest rate spread; and (v) the net interest margin. Non-accrual and restructured loans are included in the average balances presented in this table; however, interest income foregone on non-accrual loans is not included. Interest income, yields, spread and margin have been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis for loans and investment securities that are exempt from federal income taxes, at a federal tax rate of ~~35.0%~~21% (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Average
Balance
Interest ⁽¹⁾

Yield/
Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Average
Balance
Interest ⁽¹⁾

Yield/
Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Assets:
Interest earning assets:

Non-covered loans $ 19,710,115
$ 187,928
3.79 % $ 17,813,925
$ 158,963
3.56 %
Covered loans 518,026
73,452
56.70 % 700,884
74,487
42.50 %
Total loans 20,228,141
261,380
5.15 % 18,514,809
233,450
5.03 %
Investment securities ⁽³⁾
7,002,615
55,046
3.14 % 5,898,382
42,262
2.87 %
Other interest earning assets 545,224
3,777
2.75 % 557,490
3,036
2.17 %
Total interest earning assets 27,775,980
320,203
4.60 % 24,970,681
278,748
4.45 %
Allowance for loan and lease losses (160,231 ) (139,284 )
Non-interest earning assets 1,699,912
1,884,894

Total assets $ 29,315,661
$ 26,716,291

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits $ 1,590,206
3,415
0.85 % $ 1,437,677
2,224
0.62 %
Savings and money market deposits 9,968,512
21,964
0.87 % 8,349,281
12,974
0.62 %
Time deposits 6,290,056
20,540
1.30 % 5,567,909
15,770
1.13 %
Total interest bearing deposits 17,848,774
45,919
1.02 % 15,354,867
30,968
0.80 %
FHLB advances 4,924,325
16,946
1.37 % 5,143,003
11,956
0.92 %
Notes and other borrowings 402,828
5,314
5.28 % 403,590
5,322
5.27 %
Total interest bearing liabilities 23,175,927
68,179
1.17 % 20,901,460
48,246
0.92 %
Non-interest bearing demand deposits 3,036,046
2,981,017

Other non-interest bearing liabilities 468,735
460,514

Total liabilities 26,680,708
24,342,991

Stockholders' equity 2,634,953
2,373,300

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 29,315,661
$ 26,716,291

Net interest income $ 252,024
$ 230,502

Interest rate spread 3.43 % 3.53 %
Net interest margin 3.62 % 3.69 %



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019							2018
	Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Non-covered loans	$	22,505,138		$	253,766	4.52	%	$	21,117,897		$	208,415	3.96	%
Covered loans	—			—		—	%	475,568			84,200		70.82	%
Total loans	22,505,138			253,766		4.52	%	21,593,465			292,615		5.43	%
Investment securities ⁽³⁾	8,187,518			73,867		3.61	%	6,902,634			57,444		3.33	%
Other interest earning assets	525,563			5,069		3.87	%	484,087			4,499		3.73	%
Total interest earning assets	31,218,219			332,702		4.27	%	28,980,186			354,558		4.90	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(117,206		)					(140,223		)
Non-interest earning assets	1,589,286							1,912,471
Total assets	$	32,690,299						$	30,752,434
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	1,773,912		6,225		1.41	%	$	1,621,161		4,195		1.04	%
Savings and money market deposits	10,924,580			52,191		1.92	%	10,553,624			33,317		1.27	%
Time deposits	6,944,862			41,571		2.40	%	6,475,569			27,786		1.72	%
Total interest bearing deposits	19,643,354			99,987		2.04	%	18,650,354			65,298		1.40	%
Federal funds purchased	127,242			771		2.42	%	—			—		—	%
FHLB advances	5,028,418			30,263		2.41	%	4,761,659			22,988		1.94	%
Notes and other borrowings	405,726			5,325		5.25	%	402,805			5,306		5.27	%
Total interest bearing liabilities	25,204,740			136,346		2.17	%	23,814,818			93,592		1.58	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	3,932,716							3,315,851
Other non-interest bearing liabilities	601,703							536,800
Total liabilities	29,739,159							27,667,469
Stockholders' equity	2,951,140							3,084,965
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	32,690,299						$	30,752,434
Net interest income				$	196,356						$	260,966
Interest rate spread						2.10	%						3.32	%
Net interest margin						2.52	%						3.60	%


(1)	On a tax-equivalent ~~basis.~~basis where applicable. The tax-equivalent adjustment for tax-exempt loans was ~~$7.6~~$4.4 million and ~~$6.2~~$4.4 million, and the tax-equivalent adjustment for tax-exempt investment securities was ~~$3.2~~$1.1 million and ~~$2.6~~$1.4 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.


(2)	Annualized.


(3)	At fair value except for securities held to maturity.

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Average
Balance
Interest ⁽¹⁾

Yield/
Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Average
Balance
Interest ⁽¹⁾

Yield/
Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Assets:
Interest earning assets:

Non-covered loans $ 19,169,479
$ 535,926
3.73 % $ 16,876,786
$ 452,525
3.58 %
Covered loans 560,934
225,194
53.54 % 746,709
226,659
40.48 %
Total loans 19,730,413
761,120
5.15 % 17,623,495
679,184
5.14 %
Investment securities ⁽³⁾
6,569,553
151,337
3.07 % 5,551,249
117,478
2.82 %
Other interest earning assets 557,623
10,606
2.54 % 531,245
8,850
2.22 %
Total interest earning assets 26,857,589
923,063
4.59 % 23,705,989
805,512
4.53 %
Allowance for loan and lease losses (157,015 ) (133,280 )
Non-interest earning assets 1,754,499
1,946,846

Total assets $ 28,455,073
$ 25,519,555

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits $ 1,564,229
8,913
0.76 % $ 1,341,218
6,140
0.61 %
Savings and money market deposits 9,557,907
55,741
0.78 % 8,203,676
37,285
0.61 %
Time deposits 5,988,433
55,507
1.24 % 5,177,191
43,002
1.11 %
Total interest bearing deposits 17,110,569
120,161
0.94 % 14,722,085
86,427
0.78 %
FHLB advances 4,889,578
44,262
1.21 % 4,698,492
35,972
1.02 %
Notes and other borrowings 402,821
15,947
5.28 % 403,213
15,967
5.28 %
Total interest bearing liabilities 22,402,968
180,370
1.08 % 19,823,790
138,366
0.93 %
Non-interest bearing demand deposits 3,034,682
2,944,861

Other non-interest bearing liabilities 443,430
431,921

Total liabilities 25,881,080
23,200,572

Stockholders' equity 2,573,993
2,318,983

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 28,455,073
$ 25,519,555

Net interest income $ 742,693
$ 667,146

Interest rate spread 3.51 % 3.60 %
Net interest margin 3.69 % 3.75 %



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019							2018
	Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Non-covered loans	$	22,241,262		$	498,776	4.51	%	$	20,951,864		$	405,293	3.89	%
Covered loans	—			—		—	%	487,070			165,509		67.96	%
Total loans	22,241,262			498,776		4.51	%	21,438,934			570,802		5.35	%
Investment securities ⁽³⁾	8,353,116			151,474		3.63	%	6,837,901			108,967		3.19	%
Other interest earning assets	510,933			9,921		3.91	%	501,376			8,291		3.33	%
Total interest earning assets	31,105,311			660,171		4.26	%	28,778,211			688,060		4.80	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(114,157		)					(142,706		)
Non-interest earning assets	1,596,565							1,928,486
Total assets	$	32,587,719						$	30,563,991
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	1,738,393		11,864		1.38	%	$	1,610,643		8,352		1.05	%
Savings and money market deposits	11,187,818			105,008		1.89	%	10,675,768			62,371		1.18	%
Time deposits	6,926,041			80,536		2.34	%	6,395,299			50,936		1.61	%
Total interest bearing deposits	19,852,252			197,408		2.01	%	18,681,710			121,659		1.31	%
Federal funds purchased	132,282			1,596		2.41	%	—			—		—	%
FHLB advances	4,845,337			57,637		2.40	%	4,611,359			41,285		1.81	%
Notes and other borrowings	405,547			10,633		5.24	%	402,822			10,615		5.27	%
Total interest bearing liabilities	25,235,418			267,274		2.13	%	23,695,891			173,559		1.48	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	3,769,828							3,306,238
Other non-interest bearing liabilities	629,123							487,313
Total liabilities	29,634,369							27,489,442
Stockholders' equity	2,953,350							3,074,549
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	32,587,719						$	30,563,991
Net interest income				$	392,897						$	514,501
Interest rate spread						2.13	%						3.32	%
Net interest margin						2.53	%						3.58	%


(1)	On a tax-equivalent ~~basis.~~basis where applicable. The tax-equivalent adjustment for tax-exempt loans was ~~$21.5~~$8.8 million and ~~$16.7~~$8.5 million and the tax-equivalent adjustment for tax-exempt investment securities was ~~$9.7~~$2.3 million and ~~$7.5~~$2.9 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.


(2)	Annualized.


(3)	At fair value except for securities held to maturity.

Three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018

Net interest income, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was ~~$252.0~~$196.4 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$230.5~~$261.0 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, an increase~~2018, a decrease of ~~$21.5~~$65 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in net interest income was comprised of ~~an increase~~a decrease in tax-equivalent interest income of ~~$41.5~~$21.9 million, ~~offset by~~and an increase in interest expense of ~~$19.9~~$42.8 million.

The ~~increase~~decrease in tax-equivalent interest income was comprised primarily of a ~~$27.9~~$38.8 million ~~increase~~decrease in interest income from loans ~~and~~partially offset by a ~~$12.8~~$16.4 million increase in interest income from investment securities.

~~Increased~~ Decreased interest income from loans was primarily attributable to a ~~$1.7 billion~~0.91% decrease in the tax-equivalent yield to 4.52% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 from 5.43% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, partially offset by a $912 million increase in the average balance ~~outstanding and a 0.12% increase~~outstanding.

The decline in the tax-equivalent yield on loans was mainly the result of the decrease in accretion on formerly covered residential loans. Both the average balance of and yield on these loans declined. The decline in the average balance resulted from the sale of a substantial portion of the loans during 2018 in anticipation of the termination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement. Interest income on formerly covered residential loans declined by $67.7 million to ~~5.15%~~$16.5 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~5.03%~~$84.2 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016. Factors contributing to the increase in the~~2018. The yield on the remaining loans ~~included:~~declined to 34.05% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 from 70.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, due primarily to changes in assumptions about the remaining period over which accretable yield would be realized, attributable to management's decision to retain certain loans beyond expiration of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.

The tax-equivalent yield on ~~non-covered~~ loans ~~was 3.79%~~other than formerly covered residential loans increased to 4.26% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 compared to 3.56%~~2019, from 3.96% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The most significant factor contributing to ~~the~~this increased yield ~~on non-covered loans~~ was the impact of increases in ~~market~~benchmark interest rates.

Interest income on covered loans totaled $73.5 million and $74.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The tax-equivalent yield on those loans increased to 56.70% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from 42.50% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in the yield on covered loans resulted primarily from improvements in expected cash flows for ACI loans.

The impact on the overall yield on loans of increased yields on both covered and non-covered loans considered individually was somewhat offset by the continued increase in non-covered loans, with yields lower than those on covered loans, as a percentage of total loans.

The average balance of investment securities increased by ~~$1.1~~$1.3 billion for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018, while the tax-equivalent yield increased to ~~3.14%~~3.61% from ~~2.87%~~3.33%. The ~~most significant factor contributing to the~~ increase in ~~the~~ tax-equivalent yield ~~were increases in~~primarily reflects resetting of coupon rates on floating-rate securities.

The primary components of the increase in interest expense for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 were a ~~$15.0~~$35 million increase in interest expense on deposits and a ~~$5.0~~$7 million increase in interest expense on FHLB advances.

The increase in interest expense on deposits was attributable to an increase of ~~$2.5 billion~~$993 million in average interest bearing deposits and an increase in the average cost of interest bearing deposits of ~~0.22%~~0.64% to ~~1.02%~~2.04% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~0.80%~~1.40% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. These cost increases were generally driven by the growth of deposits in competitive markets and a rising ~~market~~short-term interest rate environment.

The increase in interest expense on FHLB advances ~~reflected~~was primarily a result of an increase in the average cost of advances of ~~0.45%~~0.47% to ~~1.37%~~2.41% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~0.92%~~1.94% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The ~~increase in~~increased cost was driven primarily by increased market ~~rates and to a lesser extent, an extension of maturities through interest rate swaps.~~rates.

The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 was ~~3.62%~~2.52% as compared to ~~3.69%~~3.60% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The interest rate spread decreased to ~~3.43%~~2.10% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~3.53%~~3.32% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The ~~declines~~decrease in net interest margin ~~and interest rate spread resulted~~is primarily ~~from the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increasing by more than the yield on interest earning assets. This difference was driven primarily by~~attributed to the decline in the average balance of and yield on formerly covered residential loans as a percentage of total loans. Future trends in the net interest margin will be impacted by changes in market interest rates, including changes in the shape of the yield curve, by the mix of interest earning assets, including the decline in covered loans as a percentage of total loans, and by the Company's ability to manage the cost of funds while growing deposits in competitive markets.discussed above.

~~Nine~~Six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018

Net interest income, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was ~~$742.7~~$392.9 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$667.1~~$514.5 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, an increase~~2018, a decrease of ~~$75.5~~$121.6 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in net interest income was comprised of ~~an increase~~a decrease in tax-equivalent interest income of ~~$117.6~~$27.9 million ~~offset by~~and an increase in interest expense of ~~$42.0~~$93.7 million. Interest income on formerly covered residential loans declined by $132.7 million to $32.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 from $165.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

The ~~increase~~decrease in tax-equivalent interest income was comprised primarily of ~~an $81.9~~a $72.0 million ~~increase~~decrease in interest income from loans ~~and~~partially offset by a ~~$33.9~~$42.5 million increase in interest income from investment securities.

~~Increased~~Decreased interest income from loans was primarily attributable to a ~~$2.1 billion~~0.84% decrease in the tax-equivalent yield to 4.51% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 from 5.35% for the six months ended June 30, 2018, partially offset by an $802 million increase in the average balance and a 0.01% increase in the tax-equivalent yield to 5.15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from 5.14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Offsetting factors contributing to the relatively steady yield on loans included:

Although the yield on non-covered loans increased to 3.73% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from 3.58% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, lower-yielding non-covered loans comprised a greater percentage of the portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 than for the corresponding period in 2016. Non-covered loans represented 97.2% of the average balance of loans outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 95.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest income on covered loans totaled $225.2 million and $226.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The tax-equivalent yield on those loans increased to 53.54% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from 40.48% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.outstanding.

The average balance of investment securities increased by ~~$1.0~~$1.5 billion for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018, while the tax-equivalent yield increased to ~~3.07%~~3.63% from ~~2.82%~~3.19%.

The primary components of the increase in interest expense for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 were a ~~$33.7~~$75.7 million increase in interest expense on deposits and ~~an $8.3~~a $16.4 million increase in interest expense on FHLB advances.

The increase in interest expense on deposits was attributable to an increase of ~~$2.4~~$1.2 billion in average interest bearing deposits and an increase in the average cost of interest bearing deposits of ~~0.16%~~0.70% to ~~0.94%~~2.01% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~0.78%~~1.31% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The increase in interest expense on FHLB advances was primarily a result of an increase in the average cost of advances of ~~0.19%~~0.59% to ~~1.21%~~2.40% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~1.02%~~1.81% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018.

Factors contributing to the changes in yields and costs for the ~~nine~~six month periods were ~~generally~~ consistent with those for the three month periods discussed above.

The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 was ~~3.69%~~2.53% as compared to ~~3.75%~~3.58% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The interest rate spread decreased to ~~3.51%~~2.13% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~3.60%~~3.32% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. The declines in net interest margin and interest rate spread resulted primarily from the factors discussed above.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is the amount of expense that, based on our judgment, is required to maintain the ALLL at an adequate level to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and that, in management’s judgment, is appropriate under GAAP. The amount of the provision is impacted by loan growth, portfolio mix, historical loss rates, the level of charge-offs and specific reserves for impaired loans, and management's evaluation of qualitative factors in the determination of general reserves. The determination of the amount of the ALLL is complex and involves a high degree of judgment and subjectivity. Our determination of the amount of the allowance and corresponding provision for loan losses considers ongoing evaluations of the credit quality of and level of credit risk inherent in various segments of the loan portfolio and of individually significant credits, levels of non-performing loans and charge-offs, historical and statistical trends and economic and other relevant factors. See “Analysis of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” below for more information about how we determine the appropriate level of the allowance.

~~The provision for loan losses for the quarter and~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017~~ included $5.4 million related to the impact of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey. The amount of this provision was determined based on our evaluation of an intensive analysis conducted by our credit teams of the individual loans potentially impacted by these storms, including but not limited to direct contact with borrowers, preliminary assessments of the extent of damage to collateral and impacts on borrowers’ business operations and consideration of the impact of insurance coverage. The amount of the provision related to the impact of these storms is subject to change as individual situations evolve.

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016, we~~2018 the Company recorded a net recovery of loan losses of $2.7 million and a provision for loan losses of $9.0 million, respectively. Factors contributing to the recovery of loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the provision recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2018 included reductions in the provision related to (i) taxi medallion loans; (ii) a decrease in the provision related to specific reserves for other loans; and (iii) changes in the composition of portfolio growth; partially offset by increases related to the relative impact on the provision of changes in certain qualitative loss factors. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, there was a reduction in overall qualitative reserves.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded provisions for loan losses of ~~$37.6~~$7.5 million and ~~$24.9~~$12.1 million, ~~respectively, related to non-covered loans. For~~respectively. Offsetting factors impacting the~~nine months ended September 30, 2017~~ ~~and 2016, we recorded provisions for loan losses of~~ ~~$60.9 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$43.6 million, respectively, related to non-covered loans. The~~ amount of the provision is impacted by loan growth, portfolio mix, historical loss rates, the level of charge-offs and specific reserves for impaired loans, and management's evaluation of qualitative factors in the determination of general reserves.

~~The most significant reason~~ for the ~~increase in the provision for loan losses related to non-covered loans for the quarter~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016 was an increase of $28.9 million~~2018 were (i) the reduction in the provision related to taxi medallion ~~loans. The~~loans; (ii) a decrease in the provision related to ~~taxi medallion loans totaled $32.7 million~~specific reserves for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, compared to $3.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. A $5.4 million provision recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2017 related to the impact of hurricanes was more thanother loans; partially offset by ~~(i) a net decrease in~~(iii) increases related to the relative impact on the provision of changes in quantitative and qualitative loss ~~factors, (ii)~~factors. For the ~~impact of lower loan growth, and (iii) a decrease in provisions for criticized and classified loans.~~

~~Factors contributing to the increase in the provision for loan losses related to non-covered loans for the nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were generally consistent with those for the three month periods discussed above.~~

For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we recorded provisions for (recovery of) loan losses of $0.3 million and $(0.4) million, respectively, related to covered loans. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we recorded provisions for (recovery of) loan losses of $2.7 million and $(1.1) million, respectively, related to covered loans. The provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 related primarily to impairment recognized on an ACI HELOC pool. As discussed below2018, there was a reduction in the section entitled "Non-interest income," the impact on our results of operations of any provision for (recovery of) loan losses on covered loans is significantly mitigated by the corresponding impact on the FDIC indemnification asset, recorded in non-interest income.overall qualitative reserves.

Non-Interest Income

~~The Company reported non-interest income of $53.3 million and $25.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Non-interest income was~~ ~~$111.4 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$77.1 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017~~ and 2016, respectively. A significant portion of our non-interest income has historically related to transactions in the covered assets. We have broken out the significant categories of non-interest income that relate to covered assets in the table below, to assist in the comparison of the amount and composition of our non-interest income with that of other financial institutions.

The following table presents a comparison of the categories of non-interest income for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Income from resolution of covered assets, net $ 6,400
$ 8,883
$ 22,066
$ 26,426
Loss on sale of covered loans, net —
(10,033 ) (1,582 ) (14,895 )
Net gain (loss) on FDIC indemnification (4,838 ) 993
(14,174 ) (9,410 )
Other 237
371
957
623
Non-interest income related to the covered assets 1,799
214
7,267
2,744
Service charges and fees 4,938
5,171
15,554
14,529
Gain on sale of non-covered loans 2,447
2,086
8,183
7,535
Gain on investment securities available for sale, net 26,931
3,008
29,194
10,065
Lease financing 13,287
11,188
40,067
32,762
Other non-interest income 3,924
3,408
11,098
9,495
$ 53,326
$ 25,075
$ 111,363
$ 77,130



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019		2018			2019		2018
Income from resolution of covered assets, net	$	—	$	4,238		$	—	$	7,555
Net loss on FDIC indemnification	—		(1,400		)	—		(5,015		)
Deposit service charges and fees	4,290		3,510			8,120		6,997
Gain on sale of loans, net	2,121		768			5,057		4,269
Gain on investment securities, net	4,116		2,142			9,901		2,506
Lease financing	17,005		17,492			34,191		31,594
Other non-interest income	7,805		5,223			14,323		12,053
	$	35,337	$	31,973		$	71,592	$	59,959

~~Non-interest income related to transactions~~Declines in ~~thecovered assets~~

The consolidated financial statements reflect the impact of gains or losses arising from transactions in the covered assets. The balance of the FDIC indemnification asset is reduced or increased as a result of decreases or increases in cash flows expected to be received from the FDIC related to these gains or losses. When these transaction gains or losses are recorded, we also record an offsetting amount in the consolidated statement of income line item “Net gain (loss) on FDIC indemnification.” This line item includes the significantly mitigating impact of FDIC indemnification related to the following types of transactions in covered assets:

~~gains or losses from the resolution of covered assets;~~

~~provisions for (recoveries of) losses on covered loans;~~

~~gains or losses on the sale of covered loans; and~~

~~gains or losses on covered OREO.~~

See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further details about the components of these gains and losses associated with covered assets, along with the related additions to or reductions in the amounts recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements, as reflected in the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Covered loans may be resolved through prepayment, short sale of the underlying collateral, foreclosure, sale of the loans or charge-off. For loans resolved through prepayment, short sale or foreclosure, the difference between consideration received in resolution of the loans and the carrying value of the loans is recorded in the consolidated statement of income line item “Income

from resolution of covered assets, net.” Both gains and losses on individual resolutions are included in this line item. Losses from the resolution of covered loans increase the amount recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements. Gains from the resolution of covered loans reduce the amount recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements. These additions to or reductions in amounts recoverable from the FDIC related to the resolution of covered loans are recorded in non-interest income in the line item “Net gain (loss) on FDIC indemnification” and reflected as corresponding increases or decreases in the FDIC indemnification asset. The amount of income or loss recorded in any period will be impacted by the amount of covered loans resolved, the amount of consideration received, and our ability to accurately project cash flows from ACI loans in future periods.

~~The following table provides further detail of the components of~~ income from resolution of covered assets, net ~~for the periods indicated (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Payments in full $ 6,423
$ 9,371
$ 22,201
$ 26,790
Other (23 ) (488 ) (135 ) (364 )
Income from resolution of covered assets, net $ 6,400
$ 8,883
$ 22,066
$ 26,426

~~Under the terms of the Purchase~~ and ~~Assumption Agreement with the~~net loss on FDIC the Bank may sell up to 2.5% of the covered loans based on UPB at the date of the FSB Acquisition, or approximately $280 million, on an annual basis without prior consent of the FDIC. Any losses incurred from such loan sales are covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement. Any loan sale in excess of this stipulated annual threshold requires approvalindemnification resulted from the ~~FDIC to be eligible for loss share coverage. However, if the Bank seeks to sell covered loans in excess~~termination of ~~the 2.5% threshold in the nine months prior to the stated termination date of loss share coverage, May 21, 2019, and the FDIC does not consent,~~ the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement ~~will be extended for two additional years with respect~~on February 13, 2019.

The most significant contributor to the increases in deposit service charges and fees was higher treasury management fee income.

The most significant components of gain on sale of loans, requested to be included in such sales. The Bank will then have the right to sell all or any portion of such loans without FDIC consent at any time within the nine months prior to the extended termination date, and any losses incurred will be covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement. This final sale mechanism, if exercised, ensures no residual credit risk in our covered loan portfolio that would otherwise arise from credit losses occurring after the termination datenet are gains on sales of the ~~Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.~~guaranteed portions of SBA loans totaling $0.8 million and $2.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively; and gains on sale of

~~The following table summarizes~~

government-insured residential loans totaling $1.3 million and $2.2 million for the ~~gain (loss) recorded~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. Gain on sale of loans, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 included losses of $2.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to the sale of covered ~~residential loans~~loans.

Gain on investment securities, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 reflected net realized gains of $3.9 million and $8.2 million, respectively, from the sale of investment securities available for sale and net unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $0.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Sales of securities during the quarter and six month periods related primarily to ongoing management of the Company's liquidity position and the ~~impact~~risk/return profile of ~~related FDIC indemnification~~the portfolio.

Lease financing income decreased by $0.5 million for ~~the periods indicated (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2017 2016
Loss on sale of covered loans $ (10,033 ) $ (1,582 ) $ (14,895 )
Net gain on FDIC indemnification 8,026
1,266
11,958
Net impact on pre-tax earnings $ (2,007 ) $ (316 ) $ (2,937 )

~~The Bank did not sell covered residential loans in~~ the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, due~~2019 compared to the ~~potential impact~~three months ended June 30, 2018. The three months ended June 30, 2018 included gains of ~~Hurricane Irma on~~$3.8 million related to the ~~market for these loans, the collateral for many~~disposition of ~~which is located in Florida.~~

Pricing received on the sale of covered loans may vary based on (i) market conditions, including the interest rate environment, the amount of capital seeking investment and the secondary supply of loans with a particular performance history or collateral type, (ii) the type and quality of collateral, (iii) the performance history of loans included in the sale and (iv) whether or not the loans have been modified. We anticipate that we will continue to exercise our right to sell covered residential loans on a quarterly basis in the future.

~~Other components of non-interest income~~

~~Period~~equipment under operating lease. Year over ~~period~~year increases in income from lease financing generally corresponded to the growth in the portfolio of equipment under operating lease.

~~Gains on sale of non-covered loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 related primarily to sales of loans by SBF.~~

Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale, net totaled $26.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2017. Substantially all of these gains resulted from the sale of securities formerly covered under the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement and originally acquired at significant discounts in the FSB Acquisition. Other gains on investment securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 related to sales of securities in the normal course of managing liquidity, portfolio duration and yield.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2019		2018		2019		2018
Employee compensation and benefits	$	58,327	$	55,162	$	178,386	$	166,374	$	57,251	$	65,537	$	122,484	$	132,573
Occupancy and equipment	18,829		18,867		56,689		57,199		13,991		14,241		27,157		28,544
Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset	45,225		38,957		135,351		116,711		—		44,250		—		84,597
Deposit insurance expense	5,764		4,943		16,827		12,866		5,027		4,623		9,068		9,435
Professional fees	2,748		3,884		12,573		10,119		6,937		2,657		14,808		5,532
Telecommunications and data processing	3,452		3,746		10,481		10,800
Technology and telecommunications									12,013		8,644		23,181		16,858
Depreciation of equipment under operating lease	8,905		6,855		25,655		20,004		11,489		9,476		23,301		18,792
Other non-interest expense	13,455		15,590		37,735		40,151		13,377		11,819		26,776		26,733
	$	156,705	$	148,004	$	473,697	$	434,224	$	120,085	$	161,247	$	246,775	$	323,064

~~Annualized non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets was 2.1% and 2.2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and 2.2% and 2.3% for the three and~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~, respectively. Excluding amortization of the FDIC indemnification asset, non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets was 1.5% and 1.6% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and 1.6% and 1.7% for the three and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The more significant changes in the components of non-interest expense are discussed below.~~

~~Employee compensation and benefits~~

As is typical for financial institutions, employee compensation and benefits represents the single largest component of recurring non-interest expense. Employee compensation and benefits for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $3.2 million and $12.0 million compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The increases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily reflected increased headcount and general increases in compensation levels.

Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset

~~Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset totaled $45.2 million and $135.4 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to~~ ~~$39.0 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$116.7 million, respectively, for the three and~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~.

The FDIC indemnification asset was ~~initially recorded at its estimated fair value, representing~~amortized to zero during the ~~present value~~fourth quarter of estimated future cash payments from the FDIC for probable losses on covered assets. As projected cash flows from the ACI loans have increased, the yield on the loans has increased accordingly and the estimated future cash payments from the FDIC have decreased. This change2018 in ~~estimated cash flows is recognized prospectively, consistent with the recognition~~light of the increased cash flows from the ACI loans. As a result, the FDIC indemnification asset is being amortized to the amount of the estimated future cash flows. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the average rate at which the FDIC indemnification asset was amortized was 46.62% and 41.19%, respectively, compared to ~~25.36%~~ ~~and~~ ~~23.48%, respectively, during the comparable periods in~~ ~~2016~~.

The rate of amortization will increase if estimated future cash payments from the FDIC decrease. The amount of amortization is impacted by both the change in the amortization rate and the decrease in the average balance of the indemnification asset. As we continue to submit claims under the Loss Sharing Agreements and recognize periodic amortization, the balance of the indemnification asset will continue to decline.

~~See~~ ~~Note 5~~ to the consolidated financial statements for a rollforward of the FDIC indemnification asset for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016. The entire balance of the FDIC indemnification asset relates

to residential loans and OREO covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement. The following table presents the carrying value of the FDIC indemnification asset and the estimated future cash flows at the dates indicated (in thousands):

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
FDIC indemnification asset $ 349,617
$ 515,933
Less expected amortization (173,685 ) (245,350 )
Amount expected to be collected from the FDIC $ 175,932
$ 270,583

~~The amount of~~ expected amortization reflects the impact of improvements in cash flows expected to be collected from the covered loans, as well as the impact of time value resulting from the discounting of the asset when it was initially established. This amount will be amortized to non-interest expense using the effective interest method over the period during which cash flows from the FDIC are expected to be collected, which is limited to the lesser of the contractual termtermination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement

Employee compensation and ~~the expected remaining life of the indemnified assets.~~benefits

~~Deposit insurance expense~~

~~Deposit insurance expense increased $0.8~~Employee compensation and benefits declined by $8.3 million and ~~$4.0~~$10.1 million ~~respectively,~~ for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 relative to the comparable periods of the prior year, primarily due to a reduction in headcount.

Professional fees

Professional fees increased by $4.3 million and $9.3 million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the ~~corresponding periods in~~ ~~2016. These increases primarily reflect the growth of the balance sheet, the large bank surcharge imposed by the FDIC, which began in the third quarter of~~ ~~2016~~,three and six months ended June 30, 2018. The increases in ~~certain components~~professional fees were primarily attributable to consulting services related to our BankUnited 2.0 initiative.

Technology and telecommunications

Increased technology and telecommunications expense related primarily to investments we are making in cloud technology, our digital platforms, data initiatives and enhancement of ~~the Bank's assessment rate.~~some of our risk management capabilities.

~~Depreciation of equipment under operating lease~~

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease increased by $2.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016. These increases generally correspond to the growth in the portfolio of equipment under operating lease.~~

Other non-interest expense

The most significant components of other non-interest expense are advertising, promotion and ~~promotion,~~business development, costs related to lending activities and deposit generation, ~~OREO~~expenses related ~~expenses, insurance,~~to workouts and foreclosures, regulatory examination assessments, travel and general office expense. Other non-interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 includes $0.6 million related primarily to facilities damage and employee relocation and assistance due to the impact of Hurricane Irma. We do not expect future expenses related to facilities damage and employee relocation to be material to the Company.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was ~~32.2%~~25.2% and ~~31.2%~~25.9% for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, respectively, ~~compared to~~ ~~31.7%~~and ~~33.2%~~23.2% and 23.1% for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~,2018, respectively. ~~Significant components included in the reconciliation of the Company's~~The effective income tax rate todiffered from the statutory federal income tax rate of ~~35.0% included~~21% for the ~~effect of~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 due primarily to state income taxes, ~~and the impact of~~offset by income not subject to federal tax for each of the periods presented. In addition, the effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflected the impact of $0.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in excess tax benefits resulting from activity related to vesting of share-based awards and exercise of stock options.tax.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Average interest-earning assets increased ~~$3.2~~$2.3 billion to ~~$26.9~~$31.1 billion for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~$23.7~~$28.8 billion for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2018. This increase was driven by ~~a $2.1 billion~~an $802 million increase in the average balance of outstanding loans and a ~~$1.0~~$1.5 billion increase in the average balance of investment securities. ~~The increase in average loans reflected growth of $2.3 billion in average non-covered loans outstanding, partially offset by a $186~~A $332 million ~~decrease in the average balance of covered loans. The~~ decrease in average non-interest earning assets ~~period over period~~was primarily ~~reflected a~~attributed to (i) the decrease in the FDIC indemnification ~~asset. Growth~~asset, which was amortized to zero during the fourth quarter of 2018 and (ii) a decrease in ~~interest earning assets, resolution~~income taxes receivable related to a discrete income tax benefit recognized during the fourth quarter of ~~covered loans and declines in~~2017, partially offset by (iii) the ~~amount~~recognition of the ~~FDIC indemnification~~ROU asset ~~are trends that are expected~~subsequent to ~~continue.~~the adoption of ASU 2016-02 effective January1, 2019.

Average interest bearing liabilities increased ~~$2.6~~$1.5 billion to ~~$22.4~~$25.2 billion for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 from ~~$19.8~~$23.7 billion for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, due primarily to ~~increases~~an increase of ~~$2.4~~$1.2 billion in average interest bearing deposits and $191 million in average FHLB advances. Average non-interest bearing deposits increased by $90 million. We expect growth in average deposits to continue, corresponding to anticipated growth in interest earning assets.

deposits.

Average stockholders' equity ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$255~~$121 million, due primarily to the repurchase of common stock, offset by the retention of ~~earnings, but also reflecting proceeds from the exercise of stock options and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income.~~earnings.

Investment Securities ~~Available for Sale~~

The following table shows the amortized cost and carrying value, which, with the exception of investment securities held to maturity, is fair value, of investment securities ~~available for sale~~ as of the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016				June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	24,969	$	24,957	$	4,999	$	5,005	$	49,992	$	50,213	$	39,885	$	39,873
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	2,332,616		2,348,687		1,513,028		1,527,242		2,222,327		2,227,795		1,885,302		1,897,474
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	139,966		139,220		126,754		124,586		378,167		381,104		374,569		374,787
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	507,381		527,858		334,167		375,098		1,374,008		1,395,182		1,539,058		1,534,198
Private label commercial MBS	1,140,465		1,153,601		1,180,386		1,187,624		1,549,733		1,557,953		1,486,835		1,485,716
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	566,635		572,948		858,339		861,251		387,104		392,306		406,310		402,458
Collateralized loan obligations	695,414		700,319		487,678		487,296		1,205,295		1,198,282		1,239,355		1,235,198
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	80,255		82,637		187,660		186,736		155,542		157,817		204,372		204,067
Preferred stocks	60,716		70,716		76,180		88,203
State and municipal obligations	666,013		677,015		705,884		698,546		265,856		279,327		398,810		398,429
SBA securities	572,540		586,675		517,129		523,906		418,494		421,773		514,765		519,313
Other debt securities	4,056		8,839		3,999		8,091		1,395		4,781		1,393		4,846
Investment securities held to maturity									10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000
	$	6,791,026	$	6,893,472	$	5,996,203	$	6,073,584	$	8,017,913	8,076,533		$	8,100,654	8,106,359
Marketable equity securities											62,175				60,519
											$	8,138,708			$	8,166,878

Our investment strategy has focused on insuring adequate liquidity, ~~adding~~maintaining a suitable balance of high credit quality, ~~diversifying~~diverse assets, ~~to the consolidated balance sheet,~~ managing interest rate risk, and generating acceptable returns given our established risk parameters. We have sought to maintain liquidity by investing a significant portion of the portfolio in high quality liquid securities including U.S. Treasury securities, GNMA securities, SBA securities and U.S. Government ~~agency~~Agency MBS. Investment grade municipal securities provide liquidity ~~along with higher~~and attractive tax-equivalent ~~yields at longer durations than the portfolio in general.~~yields. We have also invested in highly rated structured products, including private-label commercial and residential MBS, collateralized loan obligations, single family rental real estate-backed securities and non-mortgage asset-backed securities that, while somewhat less liquid, provide us with attractive yields. Relatively short effective portfolio duration helps mitigate interest rate ~~risk arising from~~risk. Based on the ~~currently low level of market interest rates. The~~ Company’s assumptions, the estimated

weighted average ~~expected~~ life of the investment portfolio as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 was ~~4.9 years and the~~4.6 years. The effective duration of the investment portfolio as of June 30, 2019 was ~~1.7~~1.2 years. The model results are based on assumptions that may differ from actual results.

The following table shows the scheduled maturities, carrying values and current yields for investment securities available for sale as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019, as well as the carrying value and yield of marketable equity securities. Scheduled maturities have been adjusted for anticipated prepayments ~~of MBS and other pass through securities.~~when applicable. Yields on tax-exempt securities have been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, based on a federal income tax rate of 21% (dollars in thousands):


	Within One Year				After One Year Through Five Years				After Five Years Through Ten Years				After Ten Years				Total				Within One Year				After One Year Through Five Years				After Five Years Through Ten Years				After Ten Years				Total
	Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield
U.S. Treasury securities	$	24,957	1.19	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	24,957	1.19	%	$	50,213	2.27	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	50,213	2.27	%
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	355,685		2.94	%	860,103		2.28	%	893,121		2.14	%	239,778		2.15	%	2,348,687		2.31	%	213,745		3.06	%	1,001,087		2.90	%	851,341		2.78	%	161,622		2.80	%	2,227,795		2.86	%
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	5,562		3.80	%	11,066		3.71	%	83,066		2.50	%	39,526		3.57	%	139,220		2.95	%	4,562		3.79	%	41,748		3.69	%	228,039		3.17	%	106,755		3.78	%	381,104		3.40	%
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	113,951		4.01	%	284,366		3.82	%	101,127		4.07	%	28,414		4.39	%	527,858		3.94	%	288,891		3.85	%	791,200		3.85	%	244,915		3.68	%	70,176		3.70	%	1,395,182		3.81	%
Private label commercial MBS	90,284		3.80	%	786,542		3.57	%	276,775		3.20	%	—		—	%	1,153,601		3.50	%	71,294		4.24	%	1,279,895		3.99	%	204,844		3.51	%	1,920		3.28	%	1,557,953		3.94	%
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	1,516		3.18	%	546,920		2.92	%	24,512		3.70	%	—		—	%	572,948		2.95	%	12,920		2.94	%	113,041		3.24	%	266,345		3.52	%	—		—	%	392,306		3.42	%
Collateralized loan obligations	—		—	%	573,474		3.32	%	126,845		3.52	%	—		—	%	700,319		3.36	%	28,470		4.37	%	821,206		4.04	%	348,606		4.43	%	—		—	%	1,198,282		4.16	%
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	11,999		3.91	%	70,638		3.63	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	82,637		3.67	%	18,397		4.57	%	93,114		3.53	%	45,005		3.44	%	1,301		3.58	%	157,817		3.62	%
State and municipal obligations	—		—	%	27,509		3.00	%	624,758		4.46	%	24,748		5.60	%	677,015		4.45	%	1,581		1.96	%	33,425		2.78	%	196,001		3.98	%	48,320		4.09	%	279,327		3.84	%
SBA securities	93,080		2.54	%	245,991		2.50	%	150,116		2.47	%	97,488		2.43	%	586,675		2.49	%	85,305		3.50	%	196,359		3.41	%	95,018		3.36	%	45,091		3.31	%	421,773		3.41	%
Other debt securities	—		—	%	—		—	%	1,900		9.17	%	6,939		9.13	%	8,839		9.14	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	—		—	%	4,781		14.74	%	4,781		14.74	%
	$	697,034	3.13	%	$	3,406,609	3.04	%	$	2,282,220	3.11	%	$	436,893	2.74	%	6,822,756		3.05	%	$	775,378	3.54	%	$	4,371,075	3.66	%	$	2,480,114	3.40	%	$	439,966	3.42	%	8,066,533		3.56	%
Preferred stocks with no scheduled maturity																	70,716		8.66	%
Total investment securities available for sale																	$	6,893,472	3.11	%
Marketable equity securities with no scheduled maturity																																					62,175		7.29	%
Total investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities																																					$	8,128,708	3.58	%

The investment securities available for sale ~~investment securities~~ portfolio was in a net unrealized gain position of ~~$102.4~~$58.6 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 with aggregate fair value equal to ~~101.5%~~100.7% of amortized cost. Net unrealized gains included ~~$110.3~~$80.4 million of gross unrealized gains and ~~$7.9~~$21.8 million of gross unrealized losses. Investment securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 had an aggregate fair value of ~~$1.0~~$2.7 billion. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, 96.7%~~2019, 99.1% of investment securities available for sale were backed by the U.S. Government, U.S. Government agencies or sponsored enterprises or were rated AAA, , AA or A, based on the most recent third-party ratings. Investment securities available for sale totaling ~~$33~~$63 million were not rated at June 30, 2019. These securities have been determined by management to be of investment grade quality. Additionally, $12 million of securities acquired at substantial discounts in the FSB acquisition were rated below investment grade ~~or not rated~~ at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, all~~2019. The majority of ~~which~~these securities were ~~acquired~~held in ~~the FSB Acquisition and substantially all of which were in~~significant unrealized gain ~~positions at September 30, 2017.~~positions.

We evaluate the credit quality of individual securities in the portfolio quarterly to determine whether any of the investments in unrealized loss positions are other-than-temporarily impaired. This evaluation considers, but is not necessarily limited to, the following factors, the relative significance of which varies depending on the circumstances pertinent to each individual security:

our intent to hold the security until maturity or for a period of time sufficient for a recovery in value;

whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis;

the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than amortized cost;

adverse changes in expected cash flows;

collateral values and performance;

the payment structure of the security, including levels of subordination or over-collateralization;

changes in the economic or regulatory environment;

the general market condition of the geographic area or industry of the issuer;

the issuer’s financial condition, performance and business prospects; and

changes in credit ratings.

Our evaluation of non-agency impaired securities for OTTI as of September 30, 2017 included consideration of the potential impacts of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey. Our considerations included but were not necessarily limited to (i) observations of market pricing since the hurricanes, (ii) whether a significant portion of the underlying collateral was in an

impacted area, (iii) whether credit enhancement significantly exceeded the balance of collateral in impacted areas, (iv) for residential mortgage-backed securities, the evaluation of the extent and nature of damage to residential collateral for loans in the Bank’s residential loan portfolio located in the same areas, and (v) discussions with sponsors or managers of individual securities about specific collateral impact.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, OTTI was recognized on two positions in one private label commercial MBS. These positions were in unrealized loss positions at September 30, 2016 and the Company intended to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost basis. No securities were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, or during the three~~2019 and ~~nine months then ended.~~2018.

We do not intend to sell securities in significant unrealized loss positions at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Based on an assessment of our liquidity position and internal and regulatory guidelines for permissible investments and concentrations, it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell securities in significant unrealized loss positions prior to recovery of amortized cost basis. ~~The severity of impairment of individual securities in the portfolio is generally not material.~~ Unrealized losses in the portfolio at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 were primarily attributable to an increase in market interest rates subsequent to the date the securities were ~~acquired.~~acquired and, for some securities, widening spreads. At June 30, 2019, 83%, 14% and 3% of CLOs were rated AAA, AA and A, respectively, based on the most recent third-party ratings, with a weighted-average subordination level at 41.6%, ranging from 26.3% to 43.6%. Management performs a thorough analysis prior to purchasing CLOs, including extensive vetting of the asset manager and stress testing of collateral. Management engages an independent third party to perform ongoing credit surveillance of the CLO portfolio, performs periodic stress testing of the portfolio and continuously monitors exposure, default status, and other relevant security characteristics.

The timely repayment of principal and interest on ~~U.S. Treasury,~~SBA securities and U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise securities in unrealized loss positions is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Management performed projected cash flow analyses of the private label residential MBS and CMOs, private label commercial MBS, collateralized loan obligations and non-mortgage asset-backed securities in unrealized loss positions, incorporating CUSIP level assumptions consistent with the collateral characteristics of each security including collateral default rate, voluntary prepayment rate, severity and delinquency assumptions. Based on the results of this analysis, no credit losses were projected. Management's analysis of the credit characteristics of individual securities and the underlying collateral and levels of subordination for each of the single family rental real estate-backed securities in unrealized loss positions is not indicative of projected credit losses. Management's analysis of the state and municipal obligations in unrealized loss positions included reviewing the ratings of the securities and the results of credit surveillance performed by an independent third party. Given the expectation of timely repayment of principal and interest and the generally limited severity of impairment, the impairments were considered to be temporary.

For further discussion of our analysis of investment securities for OTTI, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

We use third-party pricing services to assist us in estimating the fair value of investment securities. We perform a variety of procedures to ensure that we have a thorough understanding of the methodologies and assumptions used by the pricing services including obtaining and reviewing written documentation of the methods and assumptions employed, conducting interviews with valuation desk personnel and reviewing model results and detailed assumptions used to value selected securities as considered necessary. Our classification of prices within the fair value hierarchy is based on an evaluation of the nature of the significant assumptions impacting the valuation of each type of security in the portfolio. We have established a robust price challenge process that includes a review by our treasury front office of all prices provided on a monthly basis. Any price evidencing unexpected month over month fluctuations or deviations from our expectations based on recent observed trading activity and other information available in the marketplace that would impact the value of the security is challenged. Responses to the price challenges, which generally include specific information about inputs and assumptions incorporated in the valuation and their sources, are reviewed in detail. If considered necessary to resolve any discrepancies, a price will be obtained from an additional independent valuation ~~specialist.~~sources. We do not typically adjust the prices provided, other than through this established challenge process. Our primary pricing services utilize observable inputs when available, and employ unobservable inputs and proprietary models only when observable inputs are not available. As a matter of course, the services validate prices by comparison to recent trading activity whenever such activity exists. Quotes obtained from the pricing services are typically non-binding.

We have also established a quarterly price validation process to assess the propriety of the pricing methodologies utilized by our primary pricing services by independently verifying the prices of a sample of securities in the portfolio. Sample sizes vary based on the type of security being priced, with higher sample sizes applied to more difficult to value security types. Verification procedures may consist of obtaining prices from an additional outside source or internal modeling, generally based on Intex. We have established acceptable percentage deviations from the price provided by the initial pricing source. If deviations fall outside the established parameters, we will obtain and evaluate more detailed information about the assumptions and inputs used by each pricing source or, if considered necessary, employ an additional valuation ~~specialist~~source to price the security in question. Pricing issues identified through this evaluation are addressed with the applicable pricing service and methodologies or inputs are revised as determined necessary. Depending on the results of the validation process, sample sizes may be extended for particular classes of securities. Results of the validation process are reviewed by the treasury front office and by senior management.

The majority of our investment securities are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. U.S. Treasury securities and ~~certain preferred stocks~~marketable equity securities are classified within level 1 of the hierarchy. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~December 31, 2016, 1.0%~~2018, 0.4% and ~~2.1%~~0.7%, respectively, of our investment securities were classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Securities classified within level 3 of the hierarchy at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 included certain private label residential MBS and trust preferred securities. These

securities were classified within level 3 of the hierarchy because proprietary assumptions related to voluntary prepayment rates, default probabilities, loss severities and discount rates were considered significant to the valuation. There were no transfers of investment securities between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.

For additional discussion of the fair values of investment securities, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 included ~~$32~~$189 million of ~~commercial~~Pinnacle loans ~~originated by SBF with~~transferred to held for sale and $36 million of the ~~intent to sell~~guaranteed portion of SBA loans held for sale in the secondary market. ~~Commercial~~At December 31, 2018, loans held for sale ~~are comprised~~consisted entirely of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans. SBA loans ~~guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Loans~~ are generally sold with servicing retained. ~~Servicing~~Commercial servicing activity did not have a material impact on the results of operations for the ~~three and nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016.~~2018.

Loans

The loan portfolio comprises the Company’s primary interest-earning asset. The following tables show the composition of the loan portfolio ~~and the breakdown of the portfolio among non-covered loans, covered ACI loans and covered non-ACI loans~~ at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2017
				Covered Loans									Percent of Total		June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018
	Non-Covered Loans			ACI			Non-ACI			Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	3,958,205		$	470,300		$	28,589		$	4,457,094		21.7	%	$	4,830,943		21.4	%	$	4,606,828		21.0	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit	1,644			5,640			37,764			45,048			0.2	%
Other consumer loans	20,166			—			—			20,166			0.1	%
Government insured residential															354,731			1.6	%	265,701			1.2	%
Other															14,533			0.1	%	17,369			0.1	%
	3,980,015			475,940			66,353			4,522,308			22.0	%	5,200,207			23.1	%	4,889,898			22.3	%
Commercial:
Multi-family	3,358,801			—			—			3,358,801			16.3	%	2,381,346			10.6	%	2,583,331			11.8	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,183,275			—			—			4,183,275			20.4	%	4,945,017			21.9	%	4,700,188			21.4	%
Construction and land	271,994			—			—			271,994			1.3	%	237,222			1.1	%	227,134			1.0	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	1,959,464			—			—			1,959,464			9.5	%	2,080,578			9.2	%	2,122,381			9.7	%
Commercial and industrial	3,900,290			—			—			3,900,290			19.0	%	5,164,571			22.9	%	4,801,226			21.9	%
Commercial lending subsidiaries	2,374,193			—			—			2,374,193			11.5	%	2,531,767			11.2	%	2,608,834			11.9	%
	16,048,017			—			—			16,048,017			78.0	%	17,340,501			76.9	%	17,043,094			77.7	%
Total loans	20,028,032			475,940			66,353			20,570,325			100.0	%	22,540,708			100.0	%	21,932,992			100.0	%
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, net	44,422			—			(4,317		)	40,105					51,141					44,016
Loans including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs	20,072,454			475,940			62,036			20,610,430					22,591,849					21,977,008
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(153,725		)	(1,812		)	(3,036		)	(158,573		)			(112,141		)			(109,931		)
Loans, net	$	19,918,729		$	474,128		$	59,000		$	20,451,857				$	22,479,708				$	21,867,077

Total loans, including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, increased by ~~$1.2 billion~~$615 million to ~~$20.6~~$22.6 billion at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, from ~~$19.4~~$22.0 billion at December 31, ~~2016. Non-covered loans grew by $1.3 billion while covered loans declined by $76 million from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017. Non-covered residential~~2018.

Residential and other consumer loans grew by ~~$538~~$319 million ~~and non-covered~~for the six months ended June 30, 2019. Multi-family loans declined by $202 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to continued run-off of the New York portfolio, while other categories of commercial real estate loans grew by ~~$753 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~

~~Growth in non-covered~~$213 million. Commercial and industrial loans, ~~including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 reflected an increase~~inclusive of ~~$536~~owner occupied commercial real estate, grew by $320 million for the ~~Florida franchise, a decrease~~six months ended June 30, 2019.

Included in multi-family and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans above were $81 million and $14 million, respectively, in re-positioning loans at June 30, 2019. These loans, substantially all of ~~$74 million for the~~which are in New York, ~~franchise~~provided financing for some level of improvements by the borrower to the underlying collateral to enhance the cash flow generating capacity of the collateral. The primary purpose of these loans was not for construction.

Residential mortgages and ~~an increase of $829 million for the national platforms.~~other consumer loans

The following ~~tables show~~table shows the composition of ~~the non-covered loan portfolio~~residential and ~~the breakdown among the Florida and New York franchises and national platforms~~other consumer loans at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs ~~(dollars in~~(in thousands):

September 30, 2017
Florida New York National Total
Residential and other consumer $ 228,300
$ 206,308
$ 3,599,004
$ 4,033,612
Commercial:
Multi-family 555,193
2,807,068
—
3,362,261
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 2,572,743
1,501,597
99,229
4,173,569
Construction and land 123,655
134,854
12,947
271,456
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1,110,581
748,339
97,829
1,956,749
Commercial and industrial 2,509,353
891,978
490,751
3,892,082
Commercial lending subsidiaries —
—
2,382,725
2,382,725
$ 7,099,825
$ 6,290,144
$ 6,682,485
$ 20,072,454
35.4 % 31.3 % 33.3 % 100.0 %

December 31, 2016
Florida New York National Total
Residential and other consumer: $ 254,139
$ 226,154
$ 3,015,482
$ 3,495,775
Commercial:
Multi-family 520,263
3,309,411
—
3,829,674
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 2,337,806
1,294,231
99,771
3,731,808
Construction and land 174,494
125,983
10,436
310,913
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1,042,441
602,155
91,254
1,735,850
Commercial and industrial 2,234,393
806,660
346,085
3,387,138
Commercial lending subsidiaries —
—
2,290,194
2,290,194
$ 6,563,536
$ 6,364,594
$ 5,853,222
$ 18,781,352
34.9 % 33.9 % 31.2 % 100.0 %



	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
1-4 single family residential	$	4,897,552	$	4,664,920
Government insured residential	355,719		266,729
Home equity loans and lines of credits	1,445		1,393
Other consumer loans	13,072		15,947
	$	5,267,788	$	4,948,989

The increase in non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans and the decrease in multi-family loans in the New York franchise over the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes the impact of reclassifying $207 million of loans on mixed-use properties from multi-family to non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, based on the primary source of rental income on those properties.

~~Residential mortgages and other consumer loans~~

~~Residential mortgages and other consumer loans totaled $4.5 billion, or 22.0% of total loans, at September 30, 2017 and $4.1 billion, or 21.0% of total loans, at December 31, 2016.~~

~~The non-covered~~1-4 single family residential loan portfolio is primarily comprised of loans purchased on a national basis through established correspondent channels. The portfolio also includes loans originated through retail channels in our Florida and New York geographic footprint prior to the termination of our retail residential mortgage origination business in ~~early~~ 2016. ~~Non-covered~~1-4 single family residential mortgage loans are primarily closed-end, first lien jumbo mortgages for the purchase or re-finance of owner occupied property. The loans have terms ranging from 10 to 30 years, with either fixed or adjustable interest rates. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, $113~~2019, $111 million or ~~2.8%~~2.3% of ~~non-covered~~ residential mortgage loans were interest-only loans, substantially all of which begin amortizing 10 years after origination.

~~We do~~The Company acquires non-performing FHA and VA insured mortgages from third party servicers who have exercised their right to purchase these loans out of GNMA securitizations (collectively, "government insured pool buyout loans" or "buyout loans"). Buyout loans that re-perform, either through modification or self-cure, may be eligible for re-securitization. The balance of government insured residential buyout loans totaled $331 million at June 30, 2019. The Company is not ~~originate or acquire option ARMs, “no-doc” or “reduced-doc” mortgages and do not utilize wholesale mortgage origination channels although~~ the ~~covered loan portfolio contains loans with~~servicer of these ~~characteristics. The Company’s exposure to future losses on these mortgage loans is mitigated by the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.~~loans.

The following charts present the distribution of the ~~non-covered~~ 1-4 single family residential mortgage portfolio ~~by interest rate terms and contractual lives~~ at the dates indicated:


~~(1)~~	~~Fixed-rate loans with contractual terms of 20 years comprise less than 3% of the total at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and are reported with 15 year fixed above.~~

The following table presents the five states with the largest geographic ~~concentration~~concentrations of ~~the non-covered~~ 1-4 single family residential ~~portfolio is summarized as follows~~loans, excluding government insured residential loans, at the dates indicated ~~(dollar~~(dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
California $ 1,052,154
26.2 % $ 904,107
26.1 %
New York 848,123
21.1 % 763,824
22.0 %
Florida 530,056
13.2 % 487,294
14.0 %
District of Columbia 177,978
4.4 % 123,825
3.6 %
Virginia 175,550
4.4 % 152,113
4.4 %
Others ⁽¹⁾
1,227,983
30.7 % 1,039,186
29.9 %
$ 4,011,844
100.0 % $ 3,470,349
100.0 %


~~(1)~~	~~No other state represented borrowers with more than 4.0% of non-covered 1-4 single family residential loans outstanding at September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.~~

~~Home equity loans and lines of credit are not significant to the non-covered loan portfolio.~~

~~Other consumer loans are comprised primarily of consumer installment financing, loans secured by certificates of deposit, unsecured personal lines of credit and demand deposit account overdrafts.~~



	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
California	$	1,254,896	25.6	%	$	1,177,221	25.2	%
New York	1,012,800		20.7	%	977,146		20.9	%
Florida	643,887		13.2	%	645,020		13.8	%
Virginia	202,096		4.1	%	184,756		4.0	%
DC	196,024		4.0	%	183,211		4.0	%
All others	1,587,849		32.4	%	1,497,566		32.1	%
	$	4,897,552	100.0	%	$	4,664,920	100.0	%

Commercial loans and leases

The commercial portfolio segment includes loans secured by multi-family properties, loans secured by both owner-occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate, a limited amount of construction and land loans, commercial and industrial loans and ~~direct financing~~ leases.

Management’s loan origination strategy is heavily focused on the commercial portfolio segment, which comprised ~~80.1%~~76.9% and ~~81.6%~~77.7% of ~~non-covered~~ loans as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

The following table shows the composition of the commercial loan portfolio held for investment at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (in thousands):



	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Multi-family	$	2,383,116	$	2,585,421
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,862,256		4,611,573
Construction and land	220,536		210,516
Owner occupied commercial real estate	1,966,004		2,007,603
Commercial and industrial	4,531,948		4,312,213
National commercial lending platforms
Pinnacle	1,269,468		1,462,655
Bridge - franchise finance	593,005		517,305
Bridge - equipment finance	677,061		636,838
SBF	256,274		252,221
Mortgage warehouse lending	564,393		431,674
	$	17,324,061	$	17,028,019

Commercial real estate loans include term loans secured by owner and non-owner occupied income producing properties including rental apartments, mixed-use properties, industrial properties, retail shopping centers, free-standing single-tenant buildings, office buildings, warehouse facilities and hotels as well as real estate secured lines of credit.

The following charts present the distribution of non-owner occupied commercial real estate by product ~~types~~type at the dates indicated:

~~Loans secured by~~The Company’s commercial real estate typically have shorter repayment periods and re-price more frequently than 1-4 single family residential loans but may have longer terms and re-price less frequently than commercial and industrial loans. The Company’s underwriting standards generally provide for loan terms of five to ~~ten~~seven years, with amortization schedules of no more than thirty years. LTV ratios are typically limited to no more than 80%. Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans typically have risk profiles more closely aligned with that of commercial and industrial loans than with other types of commercial real estate loans. Construction and land loans represented only ~~1.3%~~1.1% of the total loan portfolio at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Construction and land loans are generally made for projects expected to stabilize within eighteen months of completion

in sub-markets with strong fundamentals and, to a lesser extent, for-sale residential projects to experienced developers with a strong cushion between market prices and loan basis.

The New York legislature recently enacted a number of rent regulation reform measures that generally have the impact of limiting landlords' ability to increase rents on stabilized units and to convert stabilized units to market rate units. The following tables present information about the Company's exposure to rent-regulated multi-family properties at June 30, 2019 (in thousands):



Loans to stabilized properties subject to rent regulation	$	1,364,261
Loans to non-stabilized properties subject to rent regulation	85,168
	$	1,449,429



DSCR
Less than 1.11	$	163,690
1.11 - 1.24	387,445
1.25 - 1.50	556,078
1.51 or greater	257,048
	$	1,364,261



LTV
Less than 50%	$	301,941
50% - 65%	737,626
66% - 75%	313,394
More than 75%	11,300
	$	1,364,261

Commercial and industrial loans are typically made to small, ~~and~~ middle market and larger corporate businesses and include equipment loans, secured and unsecured working capital facilities, formula-based loans, trade finance, mortgage warehouse lines, ~~taxi medallion loans,~~ SBA product offerings and business acquisition finance credit facilities. These loans may be structured as term loans, typically with maturities of ~~three~~five to seven years, or revolving lines of credit which may have multi-year maturities. The Bank also provides financing to state and local governmental entities within its geographic footprint. Commercial loans ~~include~~included shared

national credits totaling ~~$1.5~~$3.0 billion at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, typically~~2019, the majority of which are relationship based loans to borrowers in ~~our geographic footprint.~~Florida and New York.

Through its commercial lending subsidiaries, Pinnacle and Bridge, the Bank provides equipment and franchise financing on a national basis using both loan and lease structures. Pinnacle provides essential use equipment financing to state and local governmental entities directly and through vendor programs and alliances. Pinnacle offers a full array of financing structures including equipment lease purchase agreements and direct (private placement) bond re-fundings and loan agreements. Bridge has two operating divisions. The franchise finance division offers franchise acquisition, expansion and equipment financing, typically to experienced operators in well-established concepts. The equipment finance division provides primarily transportation equipment financing through a variety of loan and lease structures. The Bank's SBF unit primarily originates SBA guaranteed commercial and commercial real estate loans, generally selling the guaranteed portion in the secondary market and retaining the unguaranteed portion in portfolio. The Bank engages in mortgage warehouse lending on a national basis.

The following table presents the ~~recorded investment in loans and direct finance leases held for investment for each of our national commercial lending platforms at~~five states with the ~~dates indicated (in thousands):~~

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Pinnacle $ 1,393,965
$ 1,317,820
Bridge - franchise finance 421,821
426,661
Bridge - transportation equipment finance 566,939
545,713
SBF 235,433
225,241
Mortgage warehouse lending 465,323
322,305
$ 3,083,481
$ 2,837,740

~~The geographic~~largest concentration of ~~the~~ commercial loans and direct financing leases in the national platforms ~~is summarized as follows~~ at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016				June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
California									$	567,705	16.9	%	$	498,842	15.1	%
Florida	$	593,307	19.2	%	$	543,445	19.2	%	473,198		14.1	%	595,843		18.1	%
California	464,853		15.1	%	421,480		14.9	%
Texas									150,330		4.5	%	150,878		4.6	%
Virginia									149,038		4.4	%	153,619		4.7	%
Arizona	171,321		5.6	%	133,549		4.7	%	144,850		4.3	%	149,087		4.5	%
Texas	161,662		5.2	%	118,122		4.2	%
Iowa	152,869		5.0	%	161,874		5.7	%
Virginia	131,041		4.2	%	138,417		4.9	%
All others (1)	1,408,428		45.7	%	1,320,853		46.4	%
All others									1,875,080		55.8	%	1,752,424		53.0	%
	$	3,083,481	100.0	%	$	2,837,740	100.0	%	$	3,360,201	100.0	%	$	3,300,693	100.0	%

At June 30, 2019, 37.0% and 24.8% of commercial loans were originated within the Florida and New York portfolios, respectively. At December 31, 2018, 37.0% and 25.4% of commercial loans were originated within the Florida and New York portfolios, respectively.


~~(1)~~	~~No other state represented borrowers with more than 4.0% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.~~

Equipment under Operating Lease

Equipment under operating lease ~~increased by $48 million to $588~~totaled $708 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, from $540 million at December 31, 2016.~~2019. The portfolio consisted primarily of ~~5,424~~ railcars, non-commercial aircraft and other transport equipment. We have a total of 5,629 railcars with a carrying value of $441 million at June 30, 2019, including hoppers, tank cars, boxcars, auto carriers, center beams and gondolas leased to North American commercial end-users. The ~~portfolio also included non-commercial aircraft and other transport equipment. The~~ largest concentrations of rail cars were ~~2,264~~2,421 hopper cars and ~~1,683~~1,594 tank cars, primarily used to ship sand and petroleum products, respectively, for the energy industry. Equipment with a carrying value of ~~$288~~$285 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 was leased to companies for use in the energy industry.

The chart below presents equipment under operating lease by type at the dates indicated:

Asset Quality

In discussing asset quality, we distinguish between covered loans and non-covered loans. Although the risk profile of covered loans is higher than that of non-covered loans, our exposure to loss related to covered loans is significantly mitigated by the fair value basis recorded in these loans resulting from the application of acquisition accounting and by the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement. At September 30, 2017, residential loans covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement totaled $538 million.Commercial Loans

We have ~~established~~ a robust credit risk management framework, ~~put in place~~ an experienced team to lead the workout and recovery process for the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and ~~implemented~~ a dedicated internal credit review function. We have an experienced resolution team in place for covered residential mortgage loans, and have implemented outsourcing arrangements with industry leading firms in certain areas such as OREO resolution.

Loan performance is monitored by our credit administration and workout and recovery departments. Generally, commercial relationships with balances in excess of defined thresholds are re-evaluated at least annually and more frequently if circumstances indicate that a change in risk rating may be warranted. The defined thresholds range from $1 million to $3 million. Homogenous groups of smaller balance commercial loans may be monitored collectively. Additionally, commercial loans as well as underwriting and portfolio management practices are regularly reviewed by our internal credit review department. The Company utilizes a 13 grade internal asset risk classification system as part of its efforts to monitor and maintain commercial asset quality. Loans exhibiting potential credit weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention and, that if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment capacity of the borrower are categorized as special mention. These borrowers may exhibit negative financial trends or erratic financial performance, strained liquidity, marginal collateral coverage, declining industry trends or weak management. Loans with well-defined credit weaknesses that may result in a loss if the deficiencies are not corrected are assigned a risk rating of substandard. These borrowers may exhibit payment defaults, inadequate cash flows, operating losses, increasing balance sheet leverage, project cost overruns, unreasonable construction delays, exhausted interest reserves, declining collateral values, frequent overdrafts or past due real estate taxes. Loans with weaknesses so severe that collection in full is highly questionable or improbable, but because of certain reasonably specific pending factors have not been charged off, are assigned an internal risk rating of doubtful.

Residential mortgage loans and consumer loans are not individually risk rated. Delinquency status is the primary measure we use to monitor the credit quality of these loans. We also consider original LTV and FICO score to be significant indicators of credit quality for the non-covered 1-4 single family residential portfolio.

Although our assessment is ongoing and the results of that assessment are subject to change in the future, we do not currently believe the ability of the substantial majority of our borrowers to repay their loans or the value of the collateral securing those loans has been materially impacted by Hurricanes Irma and Harvey.

~~Non-covered Loans and Leases~~

~~Commercial Loans~~

~~The ongoing asset quality of significant commercial loans is monitored on an individual basis through our regular credit review and risk rating process.~~ We believe internal risk rating is the best indicator of the credit quality of commercial loans. ~~Homogenous groups of smaller balance commercial loans may be monitored collectively.~~

The following table summarizes the Company's commercial credit exposure, based on internal risk rating, at the dates indicated (in thousands):

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Pass $ 15,505,587
$ 14,897,121
Special mention 150,899
72,225
Substandard ⁽¹⁾
376,540
304,713
Doubtful 5,816
11,518
$ 16,038,842
$ 15,285,577

~~(1)~~

The balance of substandard loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 included $121 million and $138 million, respectively, of taxi medallion finance loans. Criticized and classified loans represented 3.3% of the commercial loan portfolio, of which 0.8% were taxi medallion loans, at September 30, 2017. See ~~Note 4~~ ~~to the consolidated financial statements for more detailed information about risk rating of commercial loans.~~

~~Taxi Medallion Finance~~

The commercial and industrial loan portfolio includes exposure to taxi medallion finance of $121 million at September 30, 2017. The estimated value of underlying taxi medallion collateral and liquidity in the market for sales of medallions, a potential secondary source of repayment, have declined significantly in recent years due to competitive developments in the transportation-for-hire industry. Due to the ongoing trend of declining estimated cash flows from the operation of taxi medallions leading to declines in medallion valuations, the entire taxi medallion portfolio was placed on non-accrual status and risk rated substandard as of September 30, 2017. In addition, partial charge-offs were recognized on all taxi medallion loans with carrying values in excess of collateral values, determined using the cash flow template discussed below, to reduce the carrying value of those loans to this estimated collateral value.

We update our analysis of the cash flow generating capacity of the operation of New York City medallions on a regular basis using current available taxi industry data from which taxi medallion values and prospective debt service capacity are estimated. This analysis is based on an extensive data set obtained from the NYTLC and assumptions that we believe are reasonable estimates of fleet utilization and borrower expenses. We update our analysis of estimated medallion valuations on a quarterly basis, based on these cash flow capacity estimates. At September 30, 2017, our estimate of the value of New York City taxi medallions based on our cash flow template and consideration of estimated selling costs and declining trends in medallion values was $351,000 for both corporate and individual medallions. We used this value for purposes of determining the partial charge-offs and the value of repossessed medallions. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about the valuation of New York City taxi medallions.

~~The taxi medallion portfolio had the following characteristics at September 30, 2017:~~

~~Approximately 97% of the portfolio secured directly by taxi medallions was concentrated in New York City.~~

Loans delinquent by 30 days or more totaled $13.2 million or 11.0% of the portfolio, compared to $40.8 million or 22.8% of the portfolio at December 31, 2016. Loans delinquent by 90 days or more totaled $10.4 million or 8.7% of the portfolio, compared to $29.2 million or 16.4% of the portfolio at December 31, 2016. The most significant factor contributing to the decrease in delinquencies was one large relationship that was brought current and restructured in the first quarter.

~~The portfolio included~~ ~~173~~ ~~loans modified in TDRs with a recorded investment of~~ ~~$92.4 million~~.

In the aggregate, the ALLL related to taxi medallion loans was 10.9% of the outstanding balance at September 30, 2017, compared to 6.0% at December 31, 2016. Charge-offs of $35.3 million and $47.1 million were recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 related to taxi medallion loans.

We are no longer originating new taxi medallion loans. Our portfolio management strategies include, but are not limited to, working with borrowers experiencing cash flow challenges to provide short term relief and/or extended amortization periods, pro-actively attempting to refinance loans prior to maturity, continuing to monitor industry data and obtaining updated borrower and guarantor financial information. As taxi medallion loans approach maturity or are refinanced, we expect the number and amount of TDRs in this portfolio segment to continue to increase.

~~Hurricane Impact - Commercial Loans~~

Commercial loans totaling $1.9 million and $19.4 million had been modified or granted temporary payment deferrals as of September 30, 2017 and October 31, 2017, respectively, related to the recent hurricanes. Of these modifications and deferrals, none were determined to be TDRs due to the generally insignificant nature of the payment delays.

As of September 30 and October 31, 2017, respectively, commercial loans to borrowers that have significant business operations in or are secured by collateral in areas impacted by Hurricanes Irma and Harvey totaling approximately $4.7 million and $21.3 million were more than 30 days past due; $3.7 million of these loans were more than 30 days past due prior to the storms. Approximately $22.2 million of commercial loans have been downgraded to criticized or classified status through October 31, 2017 as a result of the impact of the storms.



	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Balance		Percent of Total		Balance		Percent of Total
Pass	$	16,956,966	97.9	%	$	16,728,534	98.2	%
Special mention	59,787		0.3	%	81,070		0.5	%
Substandard	300,760		1.7	%	210,026		1.2	%
Doubtful	6,548		0.1	%	8,389		0.1	%
	$	17,324,061	100.0	%	$	17,028,019	100.0	%

Equipment Under Operating Lease

~~Four~~Three operating lease relationships with a carrying value of assets under lease ~~with a carrying value~~ totaling ~~$81~~$72 million, of which ~~$75~~$67 million were exposures to the energy industry, were internally risk rated special mention or substandard at ~~September~~June 30, 2017. The present value of remaining lease payments on these leases totaled approximately $22 million at September 30, 2017, of which $17 million were exposures to the energy industry. There have been no missed payments related to the operating lease portfolio to date.2019. One relationship ~~has~~had been restructured ~~to date, with no decrease in total minimum lease payments.~~as of June 30, 2019.

The primary risks inherent in the equipment leasing business are asset risk resulting from ownership of the equipment on operating lease and credit risk. Asset risk arises from fluctuations in supply and demand for the underlying leased equipment. ~~Railcars are long-lived equipment with useful lives of approximately 35-50 years.~~ The equipment is leased to commercial end-users with original lease terms generally ranging from ~~3-9~~three to ten years at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. We are exposed to the risk that, at the end of the lease term, the value of the asset will be lower than expected, potentially resulting in reduced future lease income over the remaining life of the asset or a lower sale value. Asset risk may also lead to changes in depreciation as a result of changes in the residual values of the operating lease assets or through impairment of asset carrying values.

Asset risk is evaluated and managed by a dedicated internal staff of asset managers, managed by seasoned equipment finance professionals with a broad depth and breadth of experience in the leasing business. Additionally, we have partnered with an industry leading, experienced service provider who provides fleet management and servicing relating to the railcar fleet, including lease administration and reporting, a Regulation Y compliant full service maintenance program and railcar re-marketing. Risk is managed by setting appropriate residual values at inception and systematic reviews of residual values based on independent appraisals, performed at least annually. Additionally, our internal management team and our external service provider closely follow the rail markets, monitoring traffic flows, supply and demand trends and the impact of new technologies and regulatory requirements. Demand for railcars is sensitive to shifts in general and industry specific economic and market trends and shifts in trade flows from specific events such as natural or man-made disasters. We seek to mitigate these risks by leasing to a stable end-user base, by maintaining a relatively young and diversified fleet of assets that are expected to maintain stronger and more stable utilization rates despite impacts from unexpected events or cyclical trends and

by staggering lease maturities. We regularly monitor the impact of ~~lower~~ oil prices on the estimated residual value of rail cars being used in the petroleum/natural gas extraction sector.

Credit risk in the leased equipment portfolio results from the potential default of lessees, possibly driven by obligor specific or industry-wide conditions, and is economically less significant than asset risk, because in the operating lease business, there is no extension of credit to the obligor. Instead, the lessor deploys a portion of the useful life of the asset. Credit losses, if any, will manifest through reduced rental income due to missed payments, time off lease, or lower rental payments due either to a restructuring or re-leasing of the asset to another obligor. Credit risk in the operating lease portfolio is managed and monitored utilizing credit administration infrastructure, processes and procedures similar to those used to manage and monitor credit risk in the commercial loan portfolio. We also mitigate credit risk in this portfolio by leasing ~~only~~ to high credit quality obligors.

~~We expect our operating lease portfolio to continue to grow, and we may expand into other asset classes.~~

Based on our initial analysis of the location and condition of equipment under operating lease, we do not currently believe there has been any significant damage to such equipment or to the ongoing operations of lessees from Hurricanes Irma and Harvey.

Residential and Other Consumer Loans

The majority of our ~~non-covered~~ residential mortgage portfolio consists of loans purchased through established correspondent channels. ~~In general, we purchase~~Most of our purchases are of performing jumbo mortgage loans which have FICO scores above 700, primarily are owner-occupied and full documentation, and have a current LTV of 80% or less although loans with LTVs higher than 80% may be extended to selected credit-worthy borrowers. We perform due diligence on the purchased loans for credit, compliance, counterparty, payment history and property valuation.

We have a dedicated residential credit risk management function, and the residential portfolio is monitored by our internal credit review function. Residential mortgage loans and consumer loans are not individually risk rated. Delinquency status is the primary measure we use to monitor the credit quality of these loans. We also consider original LTV and FICO score to be significant indicators of credit quality for the 1-4 single family residential portfolio, excluding FSB loans and government insured residential loans.

The following tables show the distribution of ~~non-covered~~ 1-4 single family residential loans, excluding FSB loans and government insured residential loans, by original FICO and LTV as of the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2017										June 30, 2019
	FICO										FICO
LTV	720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total		720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total
60% or less	2.4	%	2.8	%	4.6	%	20.4	%	30.2	%
Less than 60%											2.3	%	2.6	%	4.0	%	16.9	%	25.8	%
60% - 70%	2.3	%	2.6	%	3.5	%	14.6	%	23.0	%	3.0	%	2.6	%	3.8	%	13.3	%	22.7	%
70% - 80%	3.5	%	4.4	%	7.9	%	27.2	%	43.0	%	3.9	%	4.7	%	8.5	%	29.2	%	46.3	%
More than 80%	0.6	%	0.5	%	0.6	%	2.1	%	3.8	%	0.5	%	0.8	%	0.8	%	3.1	%	5.2	%
	8.8	%	10.3	%	16.6	%	64.3	%	100.0	%	9.7	%	10.7	%	17.1	%	62.5	%	100.0	%


	December 31, 2016										December 31, 2018
	FICO										FICO
LTV	720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total		720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total
60% or less	2.5	%	3.2	%	4.7	%	21.7	%	32.1	%
Less than 60%											2.4	%	2.8	%	4.4	%	18.2	%	27.8	%
60% - 70%	2.3	%	2.7	%	3.6	%	15.1	%	23.7	%	2.7	%	2.4	%	3.8	%	13.4	%	22.3	%
70% - 80%	3.2	%	4.3	%	8.0	%	26.1	%	41.6	%	3.5	%	4.6	%	8.4	%	28.3	%	44.8	%
More than 80%	0.7	%	0.3	%	0.4	%	1.2	%	2.6	%	0.4	%	0.8	%	0.8	%	3.1	%	5.1	%
	8.7	%	10.5	%	16.7	%	64.1	%	100.0	%	9.0	%	10.6	%	17.4	%	63.0	%	100.0	%

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, the ~~non-covered~~ 1-4 single family residential loan portfolio, excluding FSB loans and government insured residential loans, had the following characteristics: substantially all were full documentation with a weighted-average FICO score of ~~765~~763 and a weighted-average LTV of ~~66.6%~~68.2%. The majority of this portfolio was owner-occupied, with ~~87.9%~~84.7% primary residence, ~~8.3%~~7.3% second homes and ~~3.8%~~8.0% investment properties. In terms of vintage, ~~22.2%~~42.1% of the portfolio was originated ~~pre-2014, 13.1%~~pre-2016, 18.2% in ~~2014, 22.2%~~2016, 20.4% in ~~2015, 26.0%~~2017, 14.5% in ~~2016~~2018 and ~~16.5%~~4.8% in ~~2017.~~2019.

~~Non-covered~~

1-4 single family residential loans, excluding government insured residential loans, past due more than 30 days totaled ~~$17.1~~$62.3 million and ~~$12.7~~$23.5 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. The increase in loans past due more than 30 days is procedural, attributable to the transfer of the servicing of the residential loan portfolio during the first quarter of 2019. Delinquency levels have started to normalize subsequent to quarter-end. The amount of these loans 90 days or more past due was ~~$2.7~~$10.1 million and ~~$2.1~~$7.0 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.

~~Hurricane Impact- Residential loans~~

The following table presents information related to 1-4 single family residential mortgages with borrowers and/or collateral located in areas impacted by Hurricanes Irma and Harvey, at the dates indicated (in thousands):

September 30, 2017 October 31, 2017
Past due more than 30 days:
Covered loans $ 14,669
$ 13,454
Total $ 20,099
$ 21,350
Granted temporary payment deferrals:
Covered loans $ 14,807
$ 16,983
Total $ 24,772
$ 25,969

Other Consumer Loans

Substantially all other consumer loans were current at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017. At~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016, there were no delinquent consumer loans.~~

~~Covered Loans~~

At September 30, 2017, residential ACI loans totaled $476 million and residential non-ACI loans totaled $62 million, including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs. All of these loans are covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.

Covered residential loans were placed into homogenous pools at the time of the FSB Acquisition and the ongoing credit quality and performance of these loans is monitored on a pool basis. We monitor the pools quarterly to determine whether any changes have occurred in expected cash flows that would be indicative of impairment or necessitate reclassification between non-accretable difference and accretable yield. At September 30, 2017, accretable yield on residential ACI loans totaled $511 million and non-accretable difference related to those loans totaled $227 million.

At September 30, 2017, the recorded investment in non-ACI 1-4 single family residential loans was $24.6 million; $1.6 million or 6.6% of these loans were 30 days or more past due and $0.9 million or 3.8% of these loans were 90 days or more past due. At September 30, 2017, the recorded investment in ACI 1-4 single family residential loans totaled $470.3 million; $34.2 million or 7.3% of these loans were delinquent by 30 days or more and $17.6 million or 3.7% were delinquent by 90 days or more.

At September 30, 2017, non-ACI home equity loans and lines of credit had an aggregate recorded investment of $37.4 million; $4.1 million or 11.1% of these loans were 30 days or more past due and $2.4 million or 6.3% were 90 days or more past due. ACI home equity loans and lines of credit had a carrying amount of $5.6 million at September 30, 2017; 13.5% of these loans were delinquent by 30 days or more.

Home equity lines of credit generally provide that payment terms be reset after an initial contractual period of interest only payments, requiring the pay down of principal through balloon payments or amortization. Additional information regarding ACI and non-ACI home equity lines of credit at September 30, 2017 is summarized as follows:

ACI Non-ACI
Loans resetting from interest only:

Previously reset 72.3 % 51.5 %
Scheduled to reset within 12 months 2.5 % 5.5 %
Scheduled to reset after 12 months 25.2 % 43.0 %
100.0 % 100.0 %
Lien position:

First liens 10.3 % 18.8 %
Second or third liens 89.7 % 81.2 %
100.0 % 100.0 %

The Company's exposure to loss related to covered loans is significantly mitigated by the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and by the fair value basis recorded in these assets resulting from the application of acquisition accounting. Management regularly evaluates the impact of resets of interest only loans on default rates for the covered home equity portfolio.2018.

Impaired Loans and Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets generally consist of (i) non-accrual loans, including loans that have been modified in TDRs and placed on non-accrual status, (ii) accruing loans that are more than 90 days contractually past due as to interest or principal, excluding ACI loans and government insured residential loans, and (iii) OREO and repossessed assets. Impaired loans also typically include loans modified in TDRs that are accruing and ACI loans or pools for which expected cash flows at acquisition (as adjusted for any additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition) have been revised downward since acquisition, other than due to changes in interest rate indices and prepayment assumptions.

The following ~~tables summarize~~table summarizes the Company's impaired loans and non-performing assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2017								December 31, 2016
	Covered Assets		Non-Covered Assets			Total			Covered Assets		Non-Covered Assets			Total			June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Non-accrual loans
Residential and other consumer:
1 - 4 single family residential	$	934	$	1,890		$	2,824		$	918	$	566		$	1,484
1-4 single family residential																	$	10,807		$	6,316
Home equity loans and lines of credit	2,369		—			2,369			2,283		—			2,283			30			—
Other consumer loans	—		332			332			—		2			2			277			288
Total residential and other consumer loans	3,303		2,222			5,525			3,201		568			3,769			11,114			6,604
Commercial:
Multi-family																	24,834			25,560
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	—		9,930			9,930			—		559			559			27,623			16,050
Construction and land	—		1,238			1,238			—		1,238			1,238			9,418			9,923
Owner occupied commercial real estate	—		21,455			21,455			—		19,439			19,439			21,752			19,789
Commercial and industrial																	27,176			28,584
Taxi medallion loans	—		120,572			120,572			—		60,660			60,660
Other commercial and industrial	—		27,569			27,569			—		16,036			16,036
Commercial lending subsidiaries	—		16,625			16,625			—		32,645			32,645			16,236			22,733
Total commercial loans	—		197,389			197,389			—		130,577			130,577			127,039			122,639
Total non-accrual loans	3,303		199,611			202,914			3,201		131,145			134,346			138,153			129,243
Non-ACI and new loans past due 90 days and still accruing	—		846			846			—		1,551			1,551
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing																	—			650
Total non-performing loans	3,303		200,457			203,760			3,201		132,696			135,897			138,153			129,893
OREO	4,114		1,661			5,775			4,658		4,882			9,540
Repossessed assets	—		2,457			2,457			—		3,551			3,551
OREO and repossessed assets																	10,042			9,517
Total non-performing assets	7,417		204,575			211,992			7,859		141,129			148,988			148,195			139,410
Impaired ACI loans and pools on accrual status	5,640		—			5,640			—		1,335			1,335
Performing TDRs																	31,303			7,898
Taxi medallion loans	—		—			—			—		36,848			36,848
Other	10,786		19,365			30,151			11,166		26,282			37,448
Total impaired loans and non-performing assets	$	23,843	$	223,940		$	247,783		$	19,025	$	205,594		$	224,619		$	179,498		$	147,308

Non-performing loans to total loans ^{(1) (3)}			1.00		%	0.99		%			0.71		%	0.70		%
Non-performing assets to total assets ⁽²⁾			0.69		%	0.72		%			0.51		%	0.53		%
Non-performing loans to total loans ⁽¹⁾⁽⁴⁾																	0.61		%	0.59		%
Non-performing assets to total assets⁽⁴⁾																	0.45		%	0.43		%
ALLL to total loans ⁽¹⁾			0.77		%	0.77		%			0.80		%	0.79		%	0.50		%	0.50		%
ALLL to non-performing loans			76.69		%	77.82		%			113.68		%	112.55		%	81.17		%	84.63		%
Net charge-offs to average loans ^{(4) (5)}			0.40		%	0.39		%			0.13		%	0.13		%
Net charge-offs to average loans⁽²⁾⁽³⁾																	0.05		%	0.28		%


(1)	Total loans for purposes of calculating these ratios include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs.


(2)	~~Ratio~~Annualized for ~~non-covered assets is calculated as non-performing non-covered assets to total assets.~~June 30, 2019.


(3)	~~Non-performing taxi medallion loans comprised 0.60% and 0.32% of total non-covered loans at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Annualized for September 30, 2017.~~


~~(5)~~	The ~~annualized~~ ratio of charge-offs of taxi medallion loans to average ~~non-covered~~total loans was ~~0.33% and 0.06%~~0.18% for ~~the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and~~ the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.

The increases in the non-performing loans to total loans and non-performing assets to total assets ratios at September 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 were primarily attributable to the increase in non-accrual taxi medallion loans. The decrease in the ALLL to non-performing loans ratio at September 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 was primarily attributable to increased charge-offs of taxi medallion loans during the three months ended September 30, 2017.


(4)	Non-performing loans and assets include the guaranteed portion of non-accrual SBA loans totaling $28.4 million or 0.13% of total loans and 0.09% of total assets, at June 30, 2019; compared to $17.8 million or 0.08% of total loans and 0.06% of total assets, at December 31, 2018.

Contractually delinquent ACI loans with remaining accretable yield are not reflected as non-accrual loans and are not considered to be non-performing assets because accretion continues to be recorded in income. Accretion continues to be recorded as long as there is an expectation of future cash flows in excess of carrying amount from these loans. The carrying value of ACI loans contractually delinquent by more than 90 days but on which income was still being recognized was ~~$18 million and $16 million~~immaterial at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018. Contractually delinquent government insured residential loans are excluded from non-performing loans as defined in the table above. The carrying value of such loans contractually delinquent by more than 90 days was $287 million and $218 million at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

~~New commercial~~Commercial loans, other than ACI loans, are placed on non-accrual status when (i) management has determined that full repayment of all contractual principal and interest is in doubt, or (ii) the loan is past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. ~~New~~Residential and ~~non-ACI residential~~consumer loans, other than ACI loans and ~~consumer~~government insured pool buyout loans, are generally placed on non-accrual status when 90 days of interest is due and unpaid. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, uncollected interest accrued is reversed and charged to interest income. Commercial loans are returned to accrual status only after all past due principal and interest has been collected and full repayment of remaining contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured. Residential loans are generally returned to accrual status when less than 90 days of interest is due and unpaid. Past due status of loans is determined based on the contractual next payment due date. Loans less than 30 days past due are reported as current.

A loan modification is considered a TDR if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise grant. These concessions may take the form of temporarily or permanently reduced interest rates, payment abatement periods, restructuring of payment terms, extensions of maturity at below market terms, or in some cases, partial forgiveness of principal. Under GAAP, modified ACI loans accounted for in pools are not accounted for as TDRs and are not separated from their respective pools when modified. Included in TDRs are residential loans to borrowers who have not reaffirmed their debt discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

The following table summarizes loans that have been modified in TDRs at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

Number of TDRs Recorded Investment Related Specific Allowance
Residential and other consumer:
Covered 59
$ 11,721
$ 1,024
Non-covered 9
912
71
Commercial:
Taxi medallion loans 173
92,370
10,505
Other 30
72,702
10,581
271
$ 177,705
$ 22,181



	Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Related Specific Allowance
Residential and other consumer	90	$	14,572	$	15
Commercial	29	65,472		4,075
	119	$	80,044	$	4,090

See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about TDRs.

Potential Problem Loans

Potential problem loans have been identified by management as those commercial loans included in the "substandard accruing" risk rating category. These loans are typically performing, but possess specifically identified credit weaknesses that, if not remedied, may lead to a downgrade to non-accrual status and identification as impaired in the near-term. Substandard accruing commercial loans totaled ~~$185~~$180 million and $96 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, substantially all of which were current as to principal and ~~interest~~interest. Management closely monitors each of these loans as well as indicators of potential negative trends developing within any particular portfolio segment. The increase in substandard accruing loans at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019 compared to December 31, 2018 does not appear to be concentrated in any one business line, geography, product type or asset class. Management has not identified any specific trends or correlated risk characteristics associated with these downgrades.

Loss Mitigation Strategies

Criticized or classified commercial loans in excess of certain thresholds are reviewed quarterly by the Criticized Asset Committee, which ~~determines~~evaluates the appropriate strategy for collection to mitigate the amount of credit losses. Criticized asset reports for each relationship are presented by the assigned relationship manager and credit officer to the Criticized Asset Committee until such time as the relationships are returned to a satisfactory credit risk rating or otherwise resolved. The Criticized Asset Committee may require the transfer of a loan to our workout and recovery department, which is tasked to effectively manage the loan with the goal of minimizing losses and expenses associated with restructure, collection and/or liquidation of collateral. Commercial loans with a risk rating of substandard; impaired loans on non-accrual status; loans modified as TDRs; ~~taxi medallion loans;~~ or assets classified as OREO or repossessed assets are usually transferred to workout and recovery. Oversight of the workout and recovery department is provided by the Asset Recovery Committee.

WeOur servicers evaluate each residential loan in default to determine the most effective loss mitigation strategy, which may be modification, short sale, or ~~foreclosure. Through~~foreclosure, and pursue the program's expiration on December 31, 2016, we offered loan modifications under the HAMP program to eligible borrowers in the residential portfolio. HAMP is a uniform loan modification process that provides eligible borrowers with sustainable monthly mortgage payments equal to a target 31% of their gross monthly income. We began offering a new modification program in late 2016 modeled after the FNMA standard modification program.

~~In addition~~alternative most suitable to the ~~modification programs discussed above, we offer a proprietary Subordinate Lien Modification Program for home equity loans~~consumer and ~~lines of credit. This provides BankUnited~~to mitigate losses to the ~~ability to offer a modification on loans covered under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement that are subordinate to either a BankUnited first lien or a first lien from another lender.~~bank.

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The ALLL relates to (i) new loans, (ii) estimated additional losses arising on non-ACI loans subsequent to the FSB Acquisition, and (iii) impairment recognized as a result of decreases in expected cash flows on ACI loans due to further credit deterioration. The impact of any additional provision for losses on covered loans is significantly mitigated by an increase in the FDIC indemnification asset. The determination of the amount of the ALLL is, by nature, highly complex and subjective. Future events that are inherently uncertain could result in material changes to the level of the ALLL. General economic conditions including but not limited to unemployment rates, the level of business investment and growth, real estate values, vacancy rates and rental rates in our primary market areas, the level of interest rates, and a variety of other factors that affect the ability of borrowers’ businesses to generate cash flows sufficient to service their debts will impact the future performance of the portfolio.

~~New and non-ACILoans~~

~~Residential and other consumer~~

~~Due~~Adoption of the CECL model in the first quarter of 2020 will result in significant changes to the ~~lack of similarity between~~methodology employed to determine the risk characteristics of new loans and covered loans in the residential and home equity portfolios, management does not believe it is appropriate to use the historical performance of the covered residential mortgage portfolio as a basis for calculating the ALLL applicable to new loans. The new loan portfolio has not yet developed an observable loss trend. Therefore, the ALLL for new residential loans is based primarily on relevant proxy historical loss rates. The ALLL for new 1-4 single family residential loans is estimated using average annual loss rates on prime residential mortgage securitizations issued between 2003 and 2008 as a proxy. Based on the comparability of FICO scores and LTV ratios between loans included in those securitizations and loans in the Bank’s portfolio and the geographic diversity in the new purchased residential portfolio, we determined that prime residential mortgage securitizations provide an appropriate proxy for incurred losses in this portfolio class. A peer group 16-quarter average net charge-off rate is used to estimate the ALLL for the new home equity and other consumer loan classes. See further discussion of the use of peer group loss factors below. The new home equity and other consumer loan portfolios are not significant components of the overall loan portfolio.

Based on an analysis of historical performance, OREO and short sale losses, recent trending data and other internal and external factors, we have concluded that historical performance by portfolio class is the best indicator of incurred loss for the non-ACI 1-4 single family residential and home equity portfolio classes. For each of these portfolio classes, a quarterly roll rate matrix is calculated by delinquency bucket to measure the rate at which loans move from one delinquency bucket to the next during a given quarter. An average 16-quarter roll rate matrix is used to estimate the amount within each delinquency bucket expected to roll to 120+ days delinquent. We assume no cure for those loans that are currently 120+ days delinquent. Loss severity given default is estimated based on internal data about OREO sales and short sales from the portfolio. The ALLL calculation incorporates a 100% loss severity assumption for home equity loans that are projected to roll to default. For non-ACI residential loans, the allowance is initially calculated based on UPB. The total of UPB less the calculated allowance is then compared to the carrying amount of the ~~loans, net of unamortized credit related fair value adjustments established at acquisition. If~~ALLL, and may materially impact the ~~calculated balance net~~amount of the ~~allowance is less than the carrying amount, an additional allowance is established. Any increase or decrease~~ALLL recorded in the ~~allowance for non-ACI residential loans will result in a corresponding increase or decrease in the FDIC indemnification asset.~~ consolidated financial statements.

Commercial loans

The allowance is comprised of specific reserves for loans that are individually evaluated and determined to be impaired as well as general reserves for loans that have not been identified as impaired.

Commercial relationships graded substandard or doubtful and on non-accrual status with committed credit facilities greater than or equal to $1.0 million, as well as loans modified in TDRs, are individually evaluated for impairment. Other commercial

relationships on non-accrual status with committed balances under $1.0 million may also be evaluated individually for impairment, at management's discretion. For loans evaluated individually for impairment and determined to be impaired, a specific allowance is established based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value of the loan, or the estimated fair value of collateral less costs to sell. We recognized partial charge-offs at September 30, 2017 on taxi medallion loans all of which are risk-rated substandard and on non-accrual status, as necessary to reduce the carrying value of the loans to our estimate of the value of New York City taxi medallions based on our cash flow template. Additionally, a specific allowance was recognized equal to the amount by which each loan exceeded 85% of the estimated value, in recognition of the continued declining trend in cash flows and lower prices observed on certain recent taxi medallion transfers. The amount of this specific allowance was determined based on management's judgment.

We believe that loans rated special mention, substandard or doubtful that are not individually evaluated for impairment exhibit characteristics indicative of a heightened level of credit risk. We apply a quantitative loss factor for loans rated special mention based on average annual probability of default and implied severity, derived from internal and external data. Loss factors for substandard and doubtful loans that are not individually evaluated are determined by using default frequency and severity information applied at the loan level. Estimated default frequencies and severities are based on available industry and internal data. In addition, we apply a floor to these calculated loss factors, based on the loss factor applied to the special mention portfolio.

~~Since~~To the ~~majority~~extent, in management's judgment, commercial portfolio segments have sufficient observable loss history, the quantitative portion of the ~~new~~ALLL is based on the Bank's historical net charge-off rates. These commercial ~~loan~~segments include owner-occupied commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans and the Bridge portfolios. For commercial portfolio issegments that have not yet ~~seasoned enough to exhibit a~~exhibited an observable loss trend, the quantitative loss factors ~~for a majority of pass rated new commercial loans is~~are based on peer group average annual historical net charge-off rates by loan class and the Company’s internal credit risk rating system. ~~Beginning in the first quarter of 2017, we revised the source of~~These commercial segments include multifamily, non-owner occupied commercial real estate and construction and land loans. For Pinnacle, quantitative loss factors ~~for certain loans, as follows:~~

~~Given the emergence of observable loss trends, the quantitative loss factors for the taxi medallion and Bridge portfolios~~ are based primarily on historical municipal default data. For most commercial portfolio segments, we use a 20 quarter look-back period in the ~~Company’s average~~calculation of historical net charge-off rates. ~~Beginning in~~

Where applicable, the ~~third quarter of 2017, all taxi medallion loans are individually evaluated for impairment as described above.~~

The general quantitative loss factor for municipal finance receivables is based on the portfolio's external ratings and Moody's historical transition matrix, as opposed to the historical cumulative default curve for municipal obligations that was used previously.

For loans that are partially guaranteed by the SBA, the loss factor applied to the non-guaranteed portion of these loans is based on the 16-quarter average charge-off rate published by the SBA for each program

~~Mortgage warehouse loans have been segregated for the purpose of determining a quantitative loss factor, to better recognize the risk profile of this portfolio segment.~~

~~The net impact of these changes on the ALLL was not material.~~

~~The~~ peer group used to calculate ~~the~~ average annual historical net charge-off rates ~~that form the basis for our~~used in estimating general ~~reserve calculations for the majority of new commercial, home equity and consumer loans~~reserves is made up of ~~the~~24 banks included in the OCC Midsize Bank Group plus ~~two~~five additional banks not included in the ~~New York region~~OCC Midsize Bank Group that management believes to be comparable based on size, geography and nature of lending operations. ~~The OCC Midsize Bank Group primarily includes commercial banks with total assets ranging from $10 - $50 billion and included 28 banks at September 30, 2017.~~ Peer bank data is obtained from the Statistics on Depository Institutions Report published by the FDIC for the most recent quarter available. These banks, as a group, are considered by management to be comparable to BankUnited in size, nature of lending operations and loan portfolio composition. We evaluate the composition of the peer group annually, or more frequently if, in our judgment, a more frequent evaluation is necessary. Our internal risk rating system comprises 13 credit grades; grades 1 through 8 are “pass” grades. The risk ratings are driven largely by debt service coverage. Peer group historical loss rates are adjusted upward for loans assigned a lower “pass” rating.

WeAs noted above, we generally use a ~~16-quarter loss experience~~20 quarter look-back period to calculate ~~peer group average annual net charge-off rates for commercial loans.~~quantitative loss rates. We believe this look-back period to be consistent with the range of industry practice and appropriate to capture a sufficient range of observations reflecting the performance of our loans, ~~most of~~ which were originated in the current economic cycle. Prior to the third quarter of 2017, we used a four-quarter loss experience period for the taxi medallion portfolio to recognize the recent deterioration in that portfolio. We use a 14-quarter loss experience period for the Bridge portfolios, reflective of the period over which an observable loss trend began to emerge.

With the exception of the Pinnacle municipal finance portfolio, a four quarter loss emergence period is used in the calculation of general reserves. A twelve quarter loss emergence period is used in the calculation of general reserves for the Pinnacle portfolio.

The primary assumptions underlying estimates of expected cash flows for ACI commercial loans are default probability and severity of loss given default. Assessments of default probability and severity are based on net realizable value analyses prepared at the individual loan level. Based on our analysis, no ALLL related to ACI commercial loans was recorded at June 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018. Commercial ACI loans are not a significant portion of the loan portfolio.

Residential and other consumer loans

The residential and other consumer loan portfolio has not yet developed an observable loss trend. Therefore, the ALLL for residential loans is based primarily on relevant proxy historical loss rates. The ALLL for 1-4 single family residential loans, excluding government insured residential loans and ACI loans, is estimated using average annual loss rates on prime residential mortgage securitizations issued between 2003 and 2008 as a proxy. Based on the comparability of FICO scores and LTV ratios between loans included in those securitizations and loans in the Bank’s portfolio and the geographic diversity in the new purchased residential portfolio, we determined that prime residential mortgage securitizations provide an appropriate proxy for incurred losses in this portfolio class. A peer group 20-quarter average net charge-off rate is used to estimate the ALLL for the home equity and other consumer loan classes. See further discussion of peer group loss factors above. The home equity and other consumer loan portfolios are not significant components of the overall loan portfolio.

Qualitative Factors

Qualitative adjustments are made to the ALLL when, based on management’s judgment, there are internal or external factors impacting probable incurred losses not taken into account by the quantitative calculations. Potential qualitative adjustments are categorized as follows:

Portfolio performance trends, including trends in and the levels of delinquencies, non-performing loans and classified loans;

Changes in the nature of the portfolio and terms of the loans, specifically including the volume and nature of policy and procedural exceptions;

Portfolio growth trends;

Changes in lending policies and procedures, including credit and underwriting ~~guidelines;~~guidelines and portfolio management practices;

Economic factors, including unemployment rates and GDP growth ~~rates;~~rates and other factors considered relevant by management;

Changes in the value of underlying collateral;

Quality of risk ratings, as evaluated by our independent credit review function;

Credit concentrations;

Changes in and experience levels of credit administration management and staff; and

Other factors identified by management that may impact the level of losses inherent in the portfolio, including but not limited to competition and legal and regulatory considerations.

ACILoans

For ACI loans, a valuation allowance is established when periodic evaluations of expected cash flows reflect a deterioration resulting from credit related factors from the level of cash flows that were estimated to be collected at acquisition plus any additional expected cash flows arising from revisions in those estimates. We perform a quarterly analysis of expected cash flows for ACI loans.

Expected cash flows ~~are estimated on a pool basis~~ for ACI 1-4 single family residential ~~and home equity loans.~~loans are estimated at the pool level. The analysis of expected ~~pool~~ cash flows incorporates ~~updated pool level~~assumptions about expected prepayment ~~rate,~~rates, default ~~rate,~~rates, delinquency ~~level~~levels and loss severity given default assumptions. Prepayment, delinquency and default curves are derived primarily from roll rates generated from the historical performance of the portfolio over the immediately preceding four quarters. Loss severity given default assumptions are generated from the historical performance of the portfolio over the immediately preceding four quarters, while loss severity from loan sales is generated from historical performance over the immediately preceding twelve quarters. Estimates of default probability and loss severity given default also incorporate updated LTV ratios, at the loan level, based on Case-Shiller Home Price Indices for the relevant MSA. Costs and fees represent an additional component of loss on default and are projected based on historical experience over the last three years. The ACI home equity roll rates include the impact of delinquent, related senior liens and loans to borrowers who have not reaffirmed their debt discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. default.

Our projected cash flow analysis reflected a decrease in expected cash flows due to credit related factors for the home equity ACI pool; therefore, a provision for loan losses of $1.8 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, along with a corresponding increase in the FDIC indemnification asset of $1.4 million. No ALLL related to 1-4 single family residential ACI pools was recorded at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017. No ALLL related to 1-4 single family residential and home equity ACI pools was recorded at December 31, 2016.~~

The primary assumptions underlying estimates of expected cash flows for ACI commercial loans are default probability and severity of loss given default. Assessments of default probability and severity are based on net realizable value analyses prepared at the individual loan level. Based on our analysis, no ALLL related to ACI commercial loans was recorded at September 30, 20172019 or December 31, ~~2016.~~ 2018.

The following ~~tables provide~~table provides an analysis of the ALLL, provision for loan losses and net charge-offs for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017											Six Months Ended June 30,
				Covered Loans								2019			2018
	Non-Covered Loans			ACI Loans		Non-ACI Loans			Total
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	150,853		$	—	$	2,100		$	152,953
Balance at beginning of period:												$	109,931		$	144,795
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses:
1-4 single family residential	(4		)	—		212			208			397			(35		)
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—			1,812		714			2,526			(150		)	(8		)
Other consumer loans	(48		)	—		—			(48		)	34			137
Multi-family	(3,303		)	—		—			(3,303		)	(1,330		)	(6,421		)
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,032			—		—			4,032			5,309			(3,864		)
Construction and land	(9		)	—		—			(9		)	498			(651		)
Owner occupied commercial real estate	4,884			—		—			4,884			(2,611		)	2,036
Commercial and industrial												6,481			19,096
Taxi medallion loans	49,604			—		—			49,604
Other commercial and industrial	9,338			—		(45		)	9,293
Commercial lending subsidiaries	(8,614		)	—		—			(8,614		)
Unallocated	5,000			—		—			5,000
Pinnacle												(116		)	(36		)
Bridge - franchise finance												1,094			585
Bridge - equipment finance												(2,072		)	1,303
Total Provision	60,880			1,812		881			63,573			7,534			12,142
Charge-offs:
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—			—		(55		)	(55		)
1-4 single family residential												—			(239		)
Other consumer loans												—			(265		)
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	(162		)	—		—			(162		)	(1,703		)	(243		)
Construction and land												(76		)	—
Owner occupied commercial real estate	(1,164		)	—		—			(1,164		)	(174		)	(5,640		)
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans	(47,141		)	—		—			(47,141		)
Other commercial and industrial	(12,567		)	—		—			(12,567		)
Commercial and industrial⁽¹⁾												(4,688		)	(16,513		)
Commercial lending subsidiaries	—			—		—			—
Bridge - franchise finance												(1,203		)	—
Total Charge-offs	(61,034		)	—		(55		)	(61,089		)	(7,844		)	(22,900		)
Recoveries:
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—			—		65			65			149			4
Other consumer loans	21			—		—			21			18			24
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate												41			123
Owner occupied commercial real estate	2			—		—			2			718			42
Commercial and industrial												1,594			739
Other commercial and industrial	2,400			—		45			2,445
Commercial lending subsidiaries	603			—		—			603
Bridge - franchise finance												—			2
Total Recoveries	3,026			—		110			3,136			2,520			934
Net Charge-offs:	(58,008		)	—		55			(57,953		)	(5,324		)	(21,966		)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	153,725		$	1,812	$	3,036		$	158,573
Balance at end of period												$	112,141		$	134,971

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Covered Loans
Non-Covered Loans ACI Loans Non-ACI Loans Total
Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 120,960
$ —
$ 4,868
$ 125,828
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses:
1-4 single family residential (324 ) —
23
(301 )
Home equity loans and lines of credit 2
—
(1,097 ) (1,095 )
Other consumer loans (98 ) —
—
(98 )
Multi-family 1,509
—
—
1,509
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 7,563
—
—
7,563
Construction and land (980 ) —
—
(980 )
Owner occupied commercial real estate 4,854
—
—
4,854
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans 9,679
—
—
9,679
Other commercial and industrial 16,686
—
(45 ) 16,641
Commercial lending subsidiaries 4,677
—
—
4,677
Total Provision 43,568
—
(1,119 ) 42,449
Charge-offs:
1-4 single family residential —
—
(312 ) (312 )
Home equity loans and lines of credit —
—
(774 ) (774 )
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate (128 ) —
—
(128 )
Construction and land (93 ) —
—
(93 )
Owner occupied commercial real estate (2,615 ) —
—
(2,615 )
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans (4,235 ) —
—
(4,235 )
Other commercial and industrial (7,245 ) —
—
(7,245 )
Commercial lending subsidiaries (1,432 ) —
—
(1,432 )
Total Charge-offs (15,748 ) —
(1,086 ) (16,834 )
Recoveries:
Home equity loans and lines of credit —
—
77
77
Other consumer loans 18
—
—
18
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1,175
—
—
1,175
Commercial and industrial
Other commercial and industrial 440
—
45
485
Commercial lending subsidiaries 1,278
—
—
1,278
Total Recoveries 2,911
—
122
3,033
Net Charge-offs: (12,837 ) —
(964 ) (13,801 )
Balance at September 30, 2016 $ 151,691
$ —
$ 2,785
$ 154,476


(1)	Includes charge-offs of $13.5 million related to taxi medallion loans during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

The following ~~tables show~~table shows the distribution of the ALLL ~~broken out between covered and non-covered loans,~~ at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2017
Covered Loans
Non-Covered Loans ACI Loans
Non-ACI
Loans
Total
%⁽¹⁾
Residential and other consumer:

1 - 4 single family residential $ 9,275
$ —
$ 393
$ 9,668
21.7 %
Home equity loans and lines of credit 7
1,812
2,643
4,462
0.2 %
Other consumer loans 90
—
—
90
0.1 %
9,372
1,812
3,036
14,220
22.0 %
Commercial:
Multi-family 21,706
—
—
21,706
16.3 %
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 39,474
—
—
39,474
20.4 %
Construction and land 2,815
—
—
2,815
1.3 %
Owner occupied commercial real estate 15,146
—
—
15,146
9.5 %
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans 13,117
—
—
13,117
0.8 %
Other commercial and industrial 37,239
—
—
37,239
18.2 %
Commercial lending subsidiaries 9,856
—
—
9,856
11.5 %
139,353
—
—
139,353
78.0 %
Unallocated 5,000
—
—
5,000

$ 153,725
$ 1,812
$ 3,036
$ 158,573
100.0 %


	December 31, 2016
			Covered Loans								June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Non-Covered Loans		ACI Loans		Non-ACI Loans		Total		%⁽¹⁾		Total		%⁽¹⁾		Total		%⁽¹⁾
Residential and other consumer:
1 - 4 single family residential	$	9,279	$	—	$	181	$	9,460	20.6	%	$	11,023	23.0	%	$	10,626	22.2	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit	7		—		1,919		1,926		0.3	%	2		0.1	%	3		—	%
Other consumer loans	117		—		—		117		0.1	%	211		—	%	159		0.1	%
	9,403		—		2,100		11,503		21.0	%	11,236		23.1	%	10,788		22.3	%
Commercial:
Multi-family	25,009		—		—		25,009		19.8	%	6,069		10.6	%	7,399		11.8	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	35,604		—		—		35,604		19.3	%	33,905		21.9	%	30,258		21.4	%
Construction and land	2,824		—		—		2,824		1.6	%	1,800		1.1	%	1,378		1.0	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	11,424		—		—		11,424		9.0	%	7,732		9.2	%	9,799		9.7	%
Commercial and industrial											37,703		22.9	%	34,316		21.9	%
Taxi medallion loans	10,655		—		—		10,655		0.9	%
Other commercial and industrial	38,067		—		—		38,067		16.6	%
Commercial lending subsidiaries	17,867		—		—		17,867		11.8	%
Pinnacle											759		5.6	%	875		6.6	%
Bridge - franchise finance											5,451		2.6	%	5,560		2.4	%
Bridge - equipment finance											7,486		3.0	%	9,558		2.9	%
	141,450		—		—		141,450		79.0	%	100,905		76.9	%	99,143		77.7	%
	$	150,853	$	—	$	2,100	$	152,953	100.0	%	$	112,141	100.0	%	$	109,931	100.0	%


(1)	Represents percentage of loans receivable in each category to total loans receivable.

The ALLL at September 30, 2017 included $5.4 million related to the impact of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey. The ALLL includes $0.4 million related to loans that were downgraded during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the hurricanes and a $5.0 million unallocated qualitative allowance.

~~Excluding the $5.0 million unallocated qualitative allowance relative to the impact of the hurricanes, the~~ balance of the ALLL ~~for non-covered loans~~ at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017 decreased slightly as compared to~~2019 increased $2.2 million from the balance at December 31, ~~2016. Decreases in quantitative loss factors applied to~~2018, while the ~~majority~~ratio of the ~~commercial loan portfolio and net decreases in qualitative factors were substantially offset by the impact of the growth of the loan portfolio and an increase in reserves for criticized and classified~~ALLL to total loans ~~including taxi medallion loans.~~remained consistent at 0.50%. Factors influencing the change in the ALLL related to specific loan types at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 as compared to December 31, ~~2016,~~2018 include:

The ALLL related to non-covered 1-4 single family residential loans did not change significantly. Increases related to growth in the corresponding portfolio were substantially offset by declines in both the applicable quantitative historical loss rate and qualitative reserves.

A decrease of ~~$3.3~~$1.3 million for multi-family loans was primarily ~~reflects decreases~~attributable to a decrease in the balance of loans outstanding and a decrease in quantitative ~~loss factors, the decline in the corresponding portfolio~~ and ~~a net decrease in~~ qualitative loss ~~factors, offset in part by an increase in criticized and classified loans.~~factors.

An increase of ~~$3.9~~$3.6 million for non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans was primarily ~~driven by the~~attributable to increases in certain qualitative loss factors, as well as growth ofin the corresponding ~~portfolio and an increase in criticized and classified loans, partially offset by a~~portfolio.

A decrease ~~in quantitative loss factors.~~

~~An increase~~ of ~~$3.7~~$2.1 million for owner occupied commercial real estate loans was primarily attributable to ~~increases~~a decrease in quantitative and qualitative loss factors, a decrease in the specific ~~reserves~~reserve for one impaired ~~loans~~loan relationship and to a ~~lesser extent,~~decline in the ~~growth of the corresponding portfolio.~~portfolio balance.

An increase of ~~$2.5~~$3.4 million for taxi medallion loans reflects the specific reserves recognized at September 30, 2017, as discussed previously. Increases in reserves were limited due to the level of charge-offs recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

~~A decrease of~~ ~~$0.8 million~~ for other commercial and industrial loans was ~~primarily driven by a decrease~~attributable to loan growth, an increase in specific reserves, ~~for impaired and other classified loans, primarily due to net charge-offs,~~partially offset by ~~growth in the corresponding portfolio.~~

A ~~$8.0 million~~ ~~decrease for commercial lending subsidiaries primarily reflects~~net decreases in quantitative ~~loss factors for the municipal finance receivables~~ and ~~decreases in~~ qualitative loss ~~factors related to portfolio growth trends and credit concentrations.~~factors.


•	A decrease of $2.1 million for equipment finance loans was primarily attributable to a decrease in the specific reserve for one impaired loan relationship and a decline in qualitative loss factors.

For additional information about the ALLL, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

Deposits

Average balances and rates paid on deposits were as follows for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
�� 2017 2016 2017 2016
Average
Balance Average
Rate Paid Average
Balance Average
Rate Paid Average
Balance
Average
Rate Paid
Average
Balance Average
Rate Paid
Demand deposits:

Non-interest bearing $ 3,036,046
— % $ 2,981,017
— % $ 3,034,682
— % $ 2,944,861
— %
Interest bearing 1,590,206
0.85 % 1,437,677
0.62 % 1,564,229
0.76 % 1,341,218
0.61 %
Money market 9,590,333
0.90 % 7,948,299
0.64 % 9,187,225
0.80 % 7,778,761
0.63 %
Savings 378,179
0.24 % 400,982
0.22 % 370,682
0.19 % 424,915
0.24 %
Time 6,290,056
1.30 % 5,567,909
1.13 % 5,988,433
1.24 % 5,177,191
1.11 %
$ 20,884,820
0.87 % $ 18,335,884
0.67 % $ 20,145,251
0.80 % $ 17,666,946
0.65 %

~~Total deposits at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 included $2.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, of brokered deposits.~~



	Three Months Ended June 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019				2018				2019				2018
	Average Balance		Average Rate Paid		Average Balance		Average Rate Paid		Average Balance		Average Rate Paid		Average Balance		Average Rate Paid
Demand deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	3,932,716	—	%	$	3,315,851	—	%	$	3,769,828	—	%	$	3,306,238	—	%
Interest bearing	1,773,912		1.41	%	1,621,161		1.04	%	1,738,393		1.38	%	1,610,643		1.05	%
Money market	10,710,550		1.95	%	10,260,713		1.30	%	10,964,547		1.93	%	10,365,109		1.21	%
Savings	214,030		0.28	%	292,911		0.25	%	223,271		0.28	%	310,659		0.26	%
Time	6,944,862		2.40	%	6,475,569		1.72	%	6,926,041		2.34	%	6,395,299		1.61	%
	$	23,576,070	1.70	%	$	21,966,205	1.19	%	$	23,622,080	1.68	%	$	21,987,948	1.12	%

The following table shows scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit with denominations greater than or equal to $100,000 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (in thousands):


Three months or less	$	741,235	$	815,410
Over three through six months	1,037,771		533,385
Over six through twelve months	1,351,330		1,882,466
Over twelve months	931,302		299,722
	$	4,061,638	$	3,530,983

FHLB Advances, Notes and Other Borrowings

In addition to deposits, we utilize FHLB advances to fund growth in interest earning assets; the advances provide us with additional flexibility in managing both term and cost of funding. FHLB advances are secured by FHLB stock, qualifying residential first mortgage and commercial real estate ~~and home equity~~ loans, and MBS. ~~At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, outstanding FHLB advances totaled $4.9 billion and $5.2 billion, respectively.~~

The contractual balance of FHLB advances outstanding at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 is scheduled to mature as follows (in thousands):

Maturing in:
2017—One month or less $ 2,395,000
2017—Over one month 855,000
2018 1,396,000
2019 100,000
2020 125,000
Carrying value $ 4,871,000



Maturing in:
2019—One month or less	$	2,055,000
2019—Over one month	1,026,000
2020	1,975,000
2021	275,000
Carrying value	$	5,331,000

The table above reflects contractual maturities of outstanding advances, and does not incorporate the impact that interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges have on the duration of borrowings. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for more information about derivative instruments.

Outstanding senior notes payable and other borrowings consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Senior notes	$	393,564	$	393,092	$	394,735	$	394,390
Capital lease obligations	9,264		9,717
Finance leases					8,926		8,359
	$	402,828	$	402,809	$	403,661	$	402,749

Senior notes have a face amount of $400 million, a fixed coupon rate of 4.875% and mature on November 17, 2025.

The Bank utilizes federal funds purchased to manage the daily cash position. At June 30, 2019, the Company had $99 million in federal funds purchased.

Capital Resources

Pursuant to the FDIA, the federal banking agencies have adopted regulations setting forth a five-tier system for measuring the capital adequacy of the financial institutions they supervise. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2018, BankUnited and the Company had capital levels that exceeded both the regulatory well-capitalized guidelines and all internal capital ratio targets.

Stockholders' equity ~~increased~~remained relatively flat compared to ~~$2.6 billion at September 30, 2017, an increase of $205 million, or 8.5%, from~~ December 31, ~~2016, due primarily to the retention~~2018. The repurchase of ~~earnings~~common shares and ~~the exercise~~payment of ~~stock options resulting in proceeds of $61.5 million during the period.~~

~~Since our formation, stockholders' equity has been impacted primarily~~dividends were largely offset by the retention of ~~earnings, and to a lesser extent, proceeds from the issuance of common shares and changes in unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, on investment securities~~

~~available for sale and cash flow hedges.~~ earnings. Our ~~rate of earnings retention is derived by dividing undistributed earnings per~~ ~~common share by earnings per common share. Our retention~~dividend payout ratio was ~~66.0%~~25.9% and ~~64.9%~~28.8% for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, respectively, compared to ~~55.7%~~25.5% and ~~58.4%~~ 26.2% for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, respectively.~~We retain a high percentage~~

In January 2019 the Board of ~~our earnings to support our planned growth.~~

~~We filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC in October 2015 that allows~~Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of up to ~~periodically offer and sell~~an additional $150 million in ~~one or more offerings, individually or in any combination, our~~shares of its outstanding common stock, ~~preferred stock~~subject to any applicable regulatory approvals. Any repurchases will be made in accordance with applicable securities laws from time to time in open market or private transactions. The extent to which the Company repurchases shares, and the timing of such repurchases, will depend upon a variety of factors, including market conditions, the Company’s capital position, regulatory requirements and other ~~non-equity securities. The shelf registration provides us with flexibility in issuing capital instruments~~considerations. No time limit was set for the completion of the share repurchase program, and ~~enables us to more readily access~~ the ~~capital markets as needed to pursue future growth opportunities and to ensure continued compliance with regulatory capital requirements. Our ability to issue securities pursuant to~~program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.

During the ~~shelf registration is subject to market conditions.~~quarter ended June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 3.0 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $102 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company repurchased approximately 4.1 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $142 million, at a weighted average price of $34.44 per share.

The following table provides information regarding regulatory capital for the Company and the Bank as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (dollars in thousands):

Actual
Required to be
Considered Well
Capitalized

Required to be
Considered
Adequately
Capitalized
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
BankUnited, Inc.:

Tier 1 leverage $ 2,491,853
8.56 %
N/A ⁽¹⁾

N/A⁽¹⁾

$ 1,164,462
4.00 %
CET1 risk-based capital $ 2,491,853
11.91 % $ 1,359,799
6.50 % $ 941,399
4.50 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital $ 2,491,853
11.91 % $ 1,673,599
8.00 % $ 1,255,199
6.00 %
Total risk based capital $ 2,657,784
12.70 % $ 2,091,998
10.00 % $ 1,673,599
8.00 %
BankUnited:

Tier 1 leverage $ 2,706,006
9.32 % $ 1,451,814
5.00 % $ 1,161,451
4.00 %
CET1 risk-based capital $ 2,706,006
12.98 % $ 1,354,884
6.50 % $ 937,997
4.50 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital $ 2,706,006
12.98 % $ 1,667,550
8.00 % $ 1,250,662
6.00 %
Total risk based capital $ 2,869,850
13.77 % $ 2,084,437
10.00 % $ 1,667,550
8.00 %

~~(1)~~



	Actual				Required to be Considered Well Capitalized				Required to be Considered Adequately Capitalized				Required to be Considered Adequately Capitalized Including Capital Conservation Buffer
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
BankUnited, Inc.:
Tier 1 leverage	$	2,805,540	8.61	%	N/A ⁽¹⁾		N/A⁽¹⁾		$	1,302,846	4.00	%	N/A⁽¹⁾		N/A⁽¹⁾
CET1 risk-based capital	$	2,805,540	11.95	%	$	1,525,425	6.50	%	$	1,056,063	4.50	%	$	1,642,765	7.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	$	2,805,540	11.95	%	$	1,877,446	8.00	%	$	1,408,085	6.00	%	$	1,994,787	8.50	%
Total risk based capital	$	2,920,497	12.44	%	$	2,346,808	10.00	%	$	1,877,446	8.00	%	$	2,464,148	10.50	%
BankUnited:
Tier 1 leverage	$	3,013,135	9.28	%	$	1,623,836	5.00	%	$	1,299,069	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
CET1 risk-based capital	$	3,013,135	12.88	%	$	1,520,227	6.50	%	$	1,052,465	4.50	%	$	1,637,167	7.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	$	3,013,135	12.88	%	$	1,871,049	8.00	%	$	1,403,286	6.00	%	$	1,987,989	8.50	%
Total risk based capital	$	3,128,092	13.37	%	$	2,338,811	10.00	%	$	1,871,049	8.00	%	$	2,455,751	10.50	%

1) There is no Tier 1 leverage ratio component in the definition of a well-capitalized bank holding company.

Levels of capital required to be well capitalized or adequately capitalized as reflected above do not include a capital conservation buffer that is being phased in beginning in 2016. When fully phased in onBeginning January 1, 2019, the Bank and the Company ~~will have~~are required to maintain ~~this~~a capital conservation buffer composed of CET1 capital equal to 2.50% of risk-weighted assets above the amounts required to be adequately capitalized ~~as reflected above,~~ in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. ~~Capital ratios required to be considered well-capitalized exceed the ratios required under the capital conservation buffer requirement at September 30, 2017.~~

Liquidity

Liquidity involves our ability to generate adequate funds to support planned interest earning asset growth, meet deposit withdrawal requests, maintain reserve requirements, conduct routine operations, pay dividends, service outstanding debt and meet other contractual obligations.

~~Primary sources of~~BankUnited's liquidity ~~include~~needs have been and continue to be met by cash flows from operations, ~~cash generated by the repayment and resolution of covered loans, cash payments received from the FDIC pursuant to the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement,~~ deposit growth, the ~~available for sale securities~~investment portfolio and FHLB advances.

For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018 net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$231.2~~$237.8 million and ~~$227.3~~$229.9 million, respectively. When compared with the six months ended June 30, 2018, operating cash flows were negatively impacted by approximately $143 million as a result of the daily cash settlement of derivative positions. These settlements, which are reported in cash flows from operating activities, are directly affected by changes in market interest rates. Accretion on ACI loans, which is reflected as a non-cash reduction in net income to arrive at operating cash flows, totaled ~~$226.3~~$33.1 million and ~~$228.5~~$167.8 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018, respectively. Accretable yield on ACI loans represents the excess of expected future cash flows over the carrying amount of the loans, and is recognized as interest income over the expected lives of the loans. Amounts recorded as accretion are realized in cash as individual loans are paid down or otherwise resolved; however, the timing of cash realization may differ from the timing of income recognition. These cash flows from the repayment ~~or resolution~~ of ~~covered~~ACI loans, inclusive of amounts that have been accreted through earnings over time, are recognized as cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows upon receipt. ~~Cash payments from the FDIC in the form of reimbursements of losses related to the~~

covered loans under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement are also characterized as investing cash flows. Cash generated by the repayment and resolution of covered loans and reimbursements from the FDIC totaled $348.5 million and $430.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Both cash generated by the repayment and resolution of covered loans and cash payments received from the FDIC have been and are expected to continue to be, although to a lesser extent in the future, consistent and relatively predictable sources of liquidity.

In addition to cash provided by operating activities, the repayment and resolution of covered loans and payments under the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement from the FDIC, BankUnited’s liquidity needs, particularly liquidity to fund growth of interest earning assets, have been and continue to be met by deposit growth and FHLB advances. The investment portfolio also provides a source of liquidity.

BankUnited has access to additional liquidity through FHLB advances, other collateralized borrowings, wholesale deposits or the sale of available for sale securities. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, unencumbered investment securities ~~available for sale~~ totaled ~~$4.3~~$5.8 billion. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, BankUnited had available borrowing capacity at the FHLB of ~~$3.8~~$3.6 billion, unused borrowing capacity at the FRB of ~~$544~~$430 million and unused Federal funds lines of credit totaling ~~$70~~$161 million. Management also has the ability to exert substantial control over the rate and timing of growth of the ~~non-covered~~ loan portfolio, and resultant requirements for liquidity to fund loans.

Continued ~~runoff of the covered loan portfolio and FDIC indemnification asset and~~ growth of deposits and ~~the non-covered loan portfolio~~loans are the most significant trends expected to impact the Bank’s liquidity in the near term.

The ALCO policy has established several measures of liquidity which are monitored monthly by the ALCO and quarterly by the Board of Directors. One primary measure of liquidity monitored by management is the 30 day total liquidity ratio, defined as (a) the sum of cash and cash equivalents, pledgeable securities and a measure of funds expected to be generated by operations over the next 30 days; divided by (b) the sum of potential deposit runoff, liabilities maturing within the 30 day time frame and a measure of funds expected to be used in operations over the next 30 days. BankUnited’s liquidity is considered acceptable if the 30 day total liquidity ratio exceeds 100%. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, BankUnited’s 30 day total liquidity ratio was ~~172%~~200%. Management also monitors a one year liquidity ratio, defined as (a) cash and cash equivalents, pledgeable securities, unused borrowing capacity at the FHLB, and loans and non-agency securities maturing within one year; divided by (b) forecasted deposit outflows and borrowings maturing within one year. ~~Forecasted deposit outflows, excluding certificate of deposits, are based on runoff rates derived from the most recent external core deposit analysis obtained by the Company.~~ This ratio allows management to monitor liquidity over a longer time horizon. The acceptable threshold established by the ALCO for this liquidity measure is 100%. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, BankUnited’s one year liquidity ratio was ~~158%~~160%. Additional measures of liquidity regularly monitored by the ALCO include the ratio of wholesale funding to total assets, a measure of available liquidity to volatile liabilities, ~~and~~ the ratio of brokered deposits to total deposits, the ratio of FHLB advances to total funding, the percentage of investment securities backed by the U.S. government and government agencies and concentrations of large deposits. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, BankUnited was within acceptable limits established by the ALCO and the Board of Directors for each of these measures.

As a holding company, BankUnited, Inc. is a corporation separate and apart from its banking subsidiary, and therefore, provides for its own liquidity. BankUnited, Inc.’s main sources of funds include management fees and dividends from the Bank, access to capital markets and, to a lesser extent, its own available for sale securities portfolio. There are regulatory limitations that affect the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to BankUnited, Inc. Management believes that such limitations will not impact our ability to meet our ongoing near-term cash obligations.

We expect that our liquidity requirements will continue to be satisfied over the next 12 months through the sources of funds described above.

Interest Rate Risk

The principal component of the Company’s risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments, or market risk, is interest rate risk, including the risk that assets and liabilities with similar re-pricing characteristics may not reprice at the same time or to the same degree. A primary objective of the Company’s asset/liability management activities is to maximize net interest income, while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate risk. The ALCO

is responsible for establishing policies to limit exposure to interest rate risk, and to ensure procedures are established to monitor compliance with these policies. The guidelines established by the ALCO are approved at least annually by the Board of Directors.

Management believes that the simulation of net interest income in different interest rate environments provides the most meaningful measure of interest rate risk. Income simulation analysis is designed to capture not only the potential of all assets and liabilities to mature or reprice, but also the probability that they will do so. Income simulation also attends to the relative interest rate sensitivities of these items, and projects their behavior over an extended period of time. Finally, income simulation

permits management to assess the probable effects on the balance sheet not only of changes in interest rates, but also of proposed strategies for responding to them.

The income simulation model analyzes interest rate sensitivity by projecting net interest income over twelve and twenty-four month periods in a most likely rate scenario based on consensus forward interest rate curves versus net interest income in alternative rate scenarios. Simulations are generated based on both static and dynamic balance sheet assumptions. Management continually reviews and refines its interest rate risk management process in response to changes in the interest rate environment and economic climate. Currently, our model projects ainstantaneous rate shocks of down 200, down 100, plus 100, plus 200, plus 300 and plus ~~300~~400 basis point ~~change with rates increasing by the magnitude of the rate ramp evenly over the next 12 months~~shifts as well as flattening and inverted yield curve ~~scenarios and instantaneous rate shocks of down 100, plus 100, plus 200 and plus 300 basis points.~~scenarios. We continually evaluate the scenarios being modeled with a view toward adapting them to changing economic conditions, expectations and trends.

The Company’s ALCO policy provides that net interest income sensitivity will be considered acceptable if decreases in forecast net interest income ~~based on a dynamic forecasted balance sheet,~~ in specified parallel rate shock scenarios are within specified percentages of forecast net interest income in the most likely rate scenario over the next twelve months and in the second year. Currently, the most likely rate scenario contemplates four 25 basis point rate cuts over the forecast horizon. The following table illustrates the ~~acceptable limits as defined by~~guidelines set forth in the ALCO policy and the impact on forecasted net interest income ~~of down 100, plus 100, plus 200 and plus 300 basis point rate shock~~in the indicated simulated scenarios at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2018:


	Down 100		Plus 100		Plus 200		Plus 300		Down 200		Down 100		Plus 100		Plus 200		Plus 300		Plus 400
Policy Limits:
Policy Guidelines:
In year 1	(6.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(10.0	)%	(14.0	)%	(10.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(10.0	)%	(14.0	)%	(18.0	)%
In year 2	(9.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(13.0	)%	(17.0	)%	(13.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(13.0	)%	(17.0	)%	(21.0	)%
Model Results at September 30, 2017 - increase (decrease):
Model Results at June 30, 2019 - increase (decrease):
In year 1	(0.4	)%	(0.2	)%	(0.6	)%	(1.2	)%	(10.0	)%	(3.3	)%	1.9	%	3.8	%	4.3	%	3.7	%
In year 2	(3.2	)%	1.7	%	3.0	%	4.2	%	(13.8	)%	(5.3	)%	3.2	%	5.2	%	7.1	%	8.0	%
Model Results at December 31, 2016 - increase (decrease):
Model Results at December 31, 2018 - increase (decrease):
In year 1	(2.0	)%	1.5	%	2.8	%	3.4	%	(4.3	)%	(0.8	)%	0.3	%	(0.9	)%	(2.4	)%	(5.6	)%
In year 2	(3.7	)%	2.6	%	4.6	%	6.6	%	(9.7	)%	(3.0	)%	3.6	%	4.4	%	4.0	%	3.1	%

The main contributor to the variation in results at June 30, 2019 as compared to the results at December 31, 2018 was the change in the path of the forward rate curve in the most likely scenario. At June 30, 2019, modeled results exceeded policy guidelines in the Down 200 scenario for year 2. Management is currently evaluating a variety of strategies that could potentially be employed to address this result, including but not limited to the re-positioning of a portion of its investment portfolio, restructuring of borrowings, or the use of derivatives.

Management also simulates changes in EVE in various interest rate environments. The ALCO policy has established parameters of acceptable risk that are defined in terms of the percentage change in EVE from a base scenario under ~~six~~eight rate scenarios, derived by implementing immediate parallel movements of plus and ~~minus~~down 100, 200, 300 and ~~300~~400 basis points from current rates. We did not simulate decreases in interest rates greater than ~~100~~200 basis points at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 or December 31, 2018 due to the ~~current~~relatively low ~~rate environment.~~level of market interest rates. The ~~parameters~~following table illustrates the acceptable guidelines as established by ~~the~~ ALCO ~~stipulate that~~and the modeled ~~decline~~change in EVE ~~is considered acceptable if~~in the ~~decline is less than 9%, 18%~~indicated scenarios at June 30, 2019 and 27% in plus or minus 100, plus or minus 200 and plus or minus 300 basis point scenarios, respectively. As of September 30, 2017, our simulation for the Company indicated percentage changes from base EVE of 1.7%, (3.6)%, (7.9)% and (12.7)% in down 100, plus 100, plus 200 and plus 300 basis point scenarios, respectively.December 31, 2018:



	Down 200		Down 100		Plus 100		Plus 200		Plus 300		Plus 400
Policy Limits	(18.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(18.0	)%	(27.0	)%	(36.0	)%
Model Results at June 30, 2019 - increase (decrease):	(5.7	)%	(1.2	)%	(1.5	)%	(4.4	)%	(8.0	)%	(12.0	)%
Model Results at December 31, 2018 - increase (decrease):	0.6	%	2.5	%	(3.1	)%	(7.5	)%	(12.4	)%	(17.3	)%

These measures fall within an acceptable level of interest rate risk per the ~~policies~~guidelines established byin the ALCO and the Board of Directors. In the event the models indicate an unacceptable level of risk, the Company could undertake a number of actions that would reduce this risk, including the sale or re-positioning of a portion of its available for sale investment portfolio, restructuring of borrowings, or the use of derivatives such as interest rate swaps and caps.policy.

Many assumptions were used by the Company to calculate the impact of changes in interest rates, including the change in rates. Actual results may not be similar to the Company’s projections due to several factors including the timing and frequency of rate changes, market conditions, changes in depositor behavior and the shape of the yield curve. Actual results may also differ due to the Company’s actions, if any, in response to changing rates and conditions.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Interest rate swaps are one of the tools we use to manage interest rate risk. These derivative instruments are used to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates on variable rate borrowings such as FHLB advances and to manage duration of liabilities. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedging instruments. The fair value of these instruments is included in other assets and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and changes in fair value are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, outstanding interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges had an aggregate notional amount of ~~$2.0~~$3.1 billion. The ~~aggregate fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow~~

~~hedges included in other assets was $1.1 million and the~~ aggregate fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges included in other liabilities was ~~$0.3~~$1.5 million.

Interest rate swaps and caps not designated as cash flow hedges had an aggregate notional amount of ~~$2.3~~$2.4 billion at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The aggregate fair value of these interest rate swaps and caps included in other assets was ~~$27.3~~$41.4 million and the aggregate fair value included in other liabilities was ~~$26.8~~$17.8 million. These interest rate swaps and caps were entered into as accommodations to certain of our commercial borrowers.

See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about derivative financial instruments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For more information on contractual obligations and commitments, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the ~~FHLB Advances, Notes and Other~~ Borrowings section of this MD&A and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in the MD&A of the Company's ~~2016~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company has made no significant changes in its critical accounting policies and significant estimates from those disclosed in the ~~2016~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Tangible book value per common share is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes this measure is relevant to understanding the capital position and performance of the Company. Disclosure of this non-GAAP financial measure also provides a meaningful base for comparability to other financial institutions. The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measurement of tangible book value per common share to the comparable GAAP financial measurement of book value per common share at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2019 (in thousands except share and per share data):



Total stockholders' equity	$	2,867,910
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets	77,696
Tangible stockholders’ equity	$	2,790,214

Common shares issued and outstanding	95,315,633

Book value per common share	$	30.09

Tangible book value per common share	$	29.27

Non-loss share diluted earnings per share is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes disclosure of this measure provides readers with information that may be useful in understanding the impact of the covered loans and FDIC indemnification asset on the Company’s earnings for periods prior to the termination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement. The following table reconciles this non-GAAP financial measurement to the comparable GAAP financial measurement of diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2018 (in millions except share and per share data, shares in thousands):

Total stockholders’ equity $ 2,623,489
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets 77,857
Tangible stockholders’ equity $ 2,545,632

Common shares issued and outstanding 106,821,902

Book value per common share $ 24.56

Tangible book value per common share $ 23.83



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Income (GAAP)	$	89.9
Less Loss Share Contribution	(25.0		)
Net Income as reported, minus Loss Share Contribution	$	64.9
Diluted earnings per common share, excluding Loss Share Contribution:
Diluted earnings per common share (GAAP)	$	0.82
Less: Net impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP)	(0.23		)
Non-loss share diluted earnings per common share (non-GAAP)	$	0.59
Non-loss share diluted earnings per share:
Loss Share Contribution	$	25.0
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share (GAAP)	105,471
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP)	0.24
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution:
Loss Share Contribution, net of tax, allocated to participating securities	(1.0		)
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share (GAAP)	105,471
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution allocated to participating securities (non-GAAP)	(0.01		)
Net impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP)	$	0.23

Supplemental Calculations

Calculation of Loss Share Contribution and Non-Loss Share Earnings Per Share

Non-Loss Share Earnings are calculated by removing the total Loss Share Contribution from Net Income. The Loss Share Contribution is a hypothetical presentation of the impact of the covered loans and FDIC indemnification asset on earnings for each respective quarter, reflecting the excess of Loss Share Earnings over hypothetical interest income that could have been earned on alternative assets (in millions except share and per share data):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 ⁽³⁾
Net Income As Reported	$	89.9
Calculation of Loss Share Contribution:
Interest Income - Covered Loans (Accretion)	$	84.2
Amortization of FDIC Indemnification Asset	(44.3		)
Loss Share Earnings	40.0
Hypothetical interest income on alternate assets ⁽¹⁾	(5.9		)
Loss Share Contribution, pre-tax	34.1
Income taxes ⁽²⁾	(9.0		)
Loss Share Contribution, after tax	$	25.0

Net Income as reported, minus Loss Share Contribution	$	64.9

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share, as Reported	$	0.82
Earnings Per Share, Loss Share Contribution	(0.23		)
Non-Loss Share Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.59


(1)	See section entitled "Supplemental Calculations - Calculation of Hypothetical Interest Income on Alternate Assets" below for calculation of these amounts and underlying assumptions.

(2) An assumed marginal tax rate of 26.5% was applied.

(3) Calculation variances of $0.1 million in the table above are due to rounding.

Calculation of Hypothetical Interest Income on Alternate Assets

The hypothetical interest income calculated below reflects the estimated income that may have been earned if the average balance of covered loans and the FDIC indemnification asset were liquidated and the proceeds assumed to be invested in securities at the weighted average yield on the Company’s investment securities portfolio as reported. Historically, cash received from the repayment, sale, or other resolution of covered loans and cash payments received from the FDIC under the terms of the Shared Loss Agreement have generally been reinvested in non-covered loans or investment securities. There is no assurance that the hypothetical results illustrated below would have been achieved if the covered loans and FDIC indemnification asset had been liquidated and proceeds reinvested (dollars in millions):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Average Balances ⁽¹⁾
Average Covered Loans	$	476
Average FDIC Indemnification Asset	231
Average Loss Share Asset	$	707

Yield
Yield on securities - reported ⁽²⁾	3.33		%
Hypothetical interest income on alternate assets	$	5.9


(1)	Calculated as the simple average of beginning and ending balances reported for each period.

(2) The weighted average yield on the Company’s investment securities as reported for the applicable quarter.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See the section entitled “Interest Rate Risk” included in Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2019, there were no changes in the ~~Company’s~~Company's internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the ~~Company’s~~Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon currently available information and the advice of legal counsel, the likelihood is remote that the impact of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

~~For~~Possible replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate may have an impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority, a ~~discussion~~regulator of financial services firms in the United Kingdom, announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. The announcement indicated that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. At this time, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates may become acceptable alternatives to LIBOR, although alternative reference rates such as SOFR are under consideration, and it is impossible to predict the effect of any such alternatives on the value of LIBOR-based securities and variable rate loans, subordinated debentures, or other securities or financial arrangements, given LIBOR's role in determining market interest rates globally. There is uncertainty with respect to the impact a potential discontinuation of LIBOR may have on credit, securities and derivatives markets broadly. Uncertainty as to the nature of alternative reference rates and as to potential changes or other reforms to LIBOR may adversely affect LIBOR rates and the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities in our portfolio, and may impact the markets in which we lend to customers and the availability and cost of hedging instruments and borrowings. If LIBOR rates are no longer available, and we are required to implement substitute indices for the calculation of interest rates under our loan agreements with our borrowers, we may incur significant expenses in effecting the transition, and may be subject to disputes or litigation with customers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Management is in the process of evaluating the impact of the Company's possible transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate. To date, the Company has completed a gap assessment, identified the population of its current exposures to LIBOR-indexed instruments and the systems and models that may be impacted by the transition, established a formal governance structure for its LIBOR transition and is in the process of designing a detailed implementation plan.

There have been no material changes in the other risk factors ~~relating to our business, please refer to~~disclosed by the ~~factors discussed under “Part I-Item 1A - Risk Factors”~~Company in ~~our 2016~~its 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February ~~28, 2017, in addition to the following factor.~~27, 2019.

~~A significant portion~~

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of ~~our loans are to borrowers whose businesses are located in or secured by properties located in the state~~Equity Securities and Use of Florida, which was impacted by Hurricane Irma. In addition, the Bank has a limited number of customers and collateral properties located in areas of Texas that were impacted by Hurricane Harvey. The effects of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey and other adverse weather events may negatively affect our geographic markets or disrupt our operations, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.Proceeds

Our geographic markets in Florida and other coastal areas are susceptible to severe weather, including hurricanes, flooding and damaging winds. On September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall in Florida as a Category 4 hurricane affecting some areas with significant flooding, wind damage and power outages. In addition, the Bank has a limited number of customers and collateral properties located in areas of Texas that were impacted by Hurricane Harvey during August, 2017. Weather events such as Hurricanes Irma and Harvey can disrupt our operations, result in damage to our facilities and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate. These events may lead to a decline in loan originations, reduce or destroy the value of collateral for our loans, particularly real estate, negatively impact the business operations of our customers, and cause an increase in delinquencies, foreclosures and loan losses. These events may also lead to a decline in regional economic conditions and prospects in certain circumstances. Our business or results of operations may be adversely impacted by these and other negative effects of such weather events.



	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period	Total number of shares purchased⁽¹⁾	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs⁽²⁾
April 1 - April 30, 2019	—	$	—	—	$	110,025,642
May 1 - May 31, 2019	1,312,496	34.77		1,312,496	$	64,386,442
June 1 - June 30, 2019	1,699,496	33.22		1,699,496	$	7,934,581
Total	3,011,992	$	33.89	3,011,992

We are currently in the process of assessing the impact of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey on our borrowers’ ability to repay their obligations to the Bank and on the value of underlying collateral properties. Although we currently believe the storms did not materially impact the ability of the substantial majority of our borrowers to repay their loans, our impact assessment is ongoing, including with respect to the impact on our loan originations, the value of properties securing our loans or the performance of our loans, the economic condition of our borrowers and their ability to timely repay their obligations, and the overall impacts on regional economic conditions and our business, operations and growth prospects in the affected market areas. As a result, it is premature to conclude with certainty as to the ultimate impact of these hurricanes on our level of loan losses, our business or the results of our operations. The Bank is generally named as a loss payee on hazard and flood insurance policies covering collateral properties and carries casualty and business interruption insurance. These policies could partially mitigate losses that the Bank may sustain due to the effects of these hurricanes; however, the timing and amount of any proceeds that we may recover from insurance policies is uncertain and may not be sufficient to adequately compensate us for losses that we experience due to these hurricanes and other natural disasters.


(1)	The total number of shares purchased during the periods indicated includes shares purchased as part of a publicly announced program.

(2)

On January 22, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to $150 million of its outstanding common stock. No time limit was set for the completion of the share repurchase program. The authorization does not require the Company to acquire any specified number of common shares and may be commenced, suspended or discontinued without prior notice. Under this authorization, $7,934,581 remained available for purchase at June 30, 2019.

Item 6.

Exhibits



Exhibit Number	Description	Location

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

101.INS	The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL ~~Instance Document~~tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	Filed herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	Filed herewith

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized this ~~8th~~6th day of ~~November 2017.~~August 2019.



	/s/ Rajinder P. Singh
	Rajinder P. Singh
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


	/s/ Leslie N. Lunak
	Leslie N. Lunak
	Chief Financial Officer

8371



		Page

	Glossary of Defined Terms	ii

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Consolidated Statements of Income	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4640

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	8068

ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	8068

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	8168

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	8168

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	69

ITEM 6.	Exhibits	8270

SIGNATURES		8371



Balance at December 31, 2015	$	902,565
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference	76,751
Accretion	(303,931		)
Balance at December 31, 2016	675,385
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference	72,827
Accretion	(226,251		)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	521,961



Balance at December 31, 2015	$	739,843
Amortization	(160,091		)
Reduction for claims filed	(46,083		)
Net loss on FDIC indemnification	(17,759		)
Balance at December 31, 2016	515,910
Amortization	(135,351		)
Reduction for claims filed	(16,768		)
Net loss on FDIC indemnification	(14,174		)
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	349,617



	Unrealized Gains on Investment Securities Available for Sale		Unrealized Losses on Derivative Instruments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	47,057	$	(5,810	)	$	41,247
Other comprehensive income	15,164		(3,822		)	11,342
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	62,221	$	(9,632	)	$	52,589

Balance at December 31, 2015	$	41,535	$	(19,353	)	$	22,182
Other comprehensive income	47,400		(27,052		)	20,348
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	88,935	$	(46,405	)	$	42,530



Commitments to fund loans	$	417,943
Commitments to purchase loans	287,302
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit	2,361,922
Commercial and standby letters of credit	83,141
	$	3,150,308



	September 30, 2017		October 31, 2017
Past due more than 30 days:
Covered loans	$	14,669	$	13,454
Total	$	20,099	$	21,350
Granted temporary payment deferrals:
Covered loans	$	14,807	$	16,983
Total	$	24,772	$	25,969



	ACI		Non-ACI
Loans resetting from interest only:
Previously reset	72.3	%	51.5	%
Scheduled to reset within 12 months	2.5	%	5.5	%
Scheduled to reset after 12 months	25.2	%	43.0	%
	100.0	%	100.0	%
Lien position:
First liens	10.3	%	18.8	%
Second or third liens	89.7	%	81.2	%
	100.0	%	100.0	%



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
				Covered Loans
	Non-Covered Loans			ACI Loans		Non-ACI Loans			Total
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	120,960		$	—	$	4,868		$	125,828
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses:
1-4 single family residential	(324		)	—		23			(301		)
Home equity loans and lines of credit	2			—		(1,097		)	(1,095		)
Other consumer loans	(98		)	—		—			(98		)
Multi-family	1,509			—		—			1,509
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	7,563			—		—			7,563
Construction and land	(980		)	—		—			(980		)
Owner occupied commercial real estate	4,854			—		—			4,854
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans	9,679			—		—			9,679
Other commercial and industrial	16,686			—		(45		)	16,641
Commercial lending subsidiaries	4,677			—		—			4,677
Total Provision	43,568			—		(1,119		)	42,449
Charge-offs:
1-4 single family residential	—			—		(312		)	(312		)
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—			—		(774		)	(774		)
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	(128		)	—		—			(128		)
Construction and land	(93		)	—		—			(93		)
Owner occupied commercial real estate	(2,615		)	—		—			(2,615		)
Commercial and industrial
Taxi medallion loans	(4,235		)	—		—			(4,235		)
Other commercial and industrial	(7,245		)	—		—			(7,245		)
Commercial lending subsidiaries	(1,432		)	—		—			(1,432		)
Total Charge-offs	(15,748		)	—		(1,086		)	(16,834		)
Recoveries:
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—			—		77			77
Other consumer loans	18			—		—			18
Owner occupied commercial real estate	1,175			—		—			1,175
Commercial and industrial
Other commercial and industrial	440			—		45			485
Commercial lending subsidiaries	1,278			—		—			1,278
Total Recoveries	2,911			—		122			3,033
Net Charge-offs:	(12,837		)	—		(964		)	(13,801		)
Balance at September 30, 2016	$	151,691		$	—	$	2,785		$	154,476



Maturing in:
2017—One month or less	$	2,395,000
2017—Over one month	855,000
2018	1,396,000
2019	100,000
2020	125,000
Carrying value	$	4,871,000




Total stockholders’ equity	$	2,623,489
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets	77,857
Tangible stockholders’ equity	$	2,545,632

Common shares issued and outstanding	106,821,902

Book value per common share	$	24.56

Tangible book value per common share	$	23.83