UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý~~QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~



☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020

o~~TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~

~~For the transition period from to~~

Commission File Number: 001-35039

BankUnited, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware	27-0162450
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



14817 Oak Lane	Miami Lakes FL	FL	33016
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ~~(305)~~ (305) 569-2000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer” and~~filer,” “smaller reporting ~~company”~~company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filerý	☒	Accelerated filer	☐	Emerging growth company	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐		~~Accelerated filer~~ o
~~Non-accelerated filer~~ o		~~Smaller reporting company~~ o
		~~Emerging growth company~~ o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o☐ No ý☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



Class	Trading Symbol	Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value	BKU	New York Stock Exchange

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant common stock, $0.01 par value, ~~was 98,374,371~~ as of May ~~3, 2019.~~5, 2020 was 92,389,643.

BANKUNITED, INC.

Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF DEFINED TERMS

The following acronyms and terms may be used throughout this Form 10-Q, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes.



ACI		Loans acquired with evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination (Acquired Credit Impaired)
ACL		Allowance for credit losses
AFS		Available for sale
ALCO		Asset/Liability Committee
ALLL		Allowance for loan and lease losses
AOCI		Accumulated other comprehensive income
ASC		Accounting Standards Codification
ASU		Accounting Standards Update
BKU		BankUnited, Inc.
BankUnited		BankUnited, National Association
The Bank		BankUnited, National Association
Bridge		Bridge Funding Group, Inc.
Buyout loans		FHA and VA insured mortgages from third party servicers who have exercised their right to purchase these loans out of GNMA securitizations
CARES Act		Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
CDO		Collateralized debt obligation
CECL		Current expected credit losses
CET1		Common Equity Tier 1 capital
~~CECL~~CFPB		~~Current expected credit loss~~Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
CLO		Collateralized loan obligations
CMBS		Commercial mortgage-backed securities
CME		Chicago Mercantile Exchange
~~CLOs~~		~~Collateralized loan obligations~~
CMOs		Collateralized mortgage obligations
~~Covered assets~~CPR		~~Assets covered under the Loss Sharing Agreements~~Constant prepayment rate
~~Covered loans~~CUSIP		~~Loans covered under the Loss Sharing Agreements~~Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures
DIF		Deposit insurance fund
DSCR		Debt Service Coverage Ratio
EPS		Earnings per common share
EVE		Economic value of equity
FASB		Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIA		Federal Deposit Insurance Act
FDIC		Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
~~FHLB~~		~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~
FHA loan		Loan guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration
FHLB		Federal Home Loan Bank
FICO		Fair Isaac Corporation (credit score)
~~FNMA~~		~~Federal National Mortgage Association~~
FRB		Federal Reserve Bank
~~FSB Acquisition~~		~~Acquisition of substantially all of the assets and assumption of all of the non-brokered deposits and substantially all of the other liabilities of BankUnited, FSB from the FDIC on May 21, 2009~~
~~FSB Loans~~		~~1-4 single family residential loans acquired in the FSB Acquisition that were formally covered by the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement~~
GAAP		U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
GDP		Gross Domestic Product
GNMA		Government National Mortgage Association
HTM		Held to maturity
IPO		Initial public offering
~~ISDA~~IRS		~~International Swaps and Derivatives Association~~
~~LIBOR~~		~~London InterBank Offered Rate~~
~~Loss Sharing Agreements~~		~~Two loss sharing agreements entered into with the FDIC in connection with the FSB Acquisition~~Internal Revenue Service



ISDA		International Swaps and Derivatives Association
LGD		Loss Given Default
LIBOR		London InterBank Offered Rate
LIHTC		Low Income Housing Tax Credits
LTV		Loan-to-value
MBS		Mortgage-backed securities
~~Non-Covered Loans~~MSA		~~Loans other than those covered under the Loss Sharing Agreements~~Metropolitan Statistical Area
~~OCI~~NRSRO		~~Other comprehensive income~~Nationally recognized statistical rating organization
NYSE		New York Stock Exchange
OCC		Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI		Other comprehensive income
OREO		Other real estate owned
~~OTTI~~PCD		~~Other-than-temporary impairment~~Purchased credit-deteriorated
PD		Probability of default
Pinnacle		Pinnacle Public Finance, Inc.
PPP		Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program
Proxy Statement		Definitive proxy statement for the Company's 2019 annual meeting of stockholders
PSU		Performance Share Unit
~~Pinnacle~~QRMs		~~Pinnacle Public Finance, Inc.~~Qualified residential mortgages
REIT		Real Estate Investment Trust
ROU Asset		Right-of-use Asset
RSU		Restricted Share Unit
SBA		U.S. Small Business Administration
SBF		Small Business Finance Unit
SEC		Securities and Exchange Commission
~~Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement~~SOFR		~~A single-family loan shared-loss agreement entered into with the FDIC in connection with the FSB Acquisition~~Secured Overnight Financing Rate
TDR		Troubled-debt restructuring
Tri-State		New York, New Jersey and Connecticut
UPB		Unpaid principal balance
USDA		U.S. Department of Agriculture
VA loan		Loan guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
~~VIEs~~WARM		~~Variable interest entities~~Weighted-average remaining maturity

iii

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks:
Non-interest bearing	$	16,470		$	9,392		$	8,905		$	7,704
Interest bearing	224,981			372,681			757,793			206,969
Cash and cash equivalents	241,451			382,073			766,698			214,673
Investment securities (including securities recorded at fair value of $8,364,624 and $8,156,878)	8,374,624			8,166,878
Investment securities (including securities recorded at fair value of $7,864,601 and $7,759,237)							7,874,601			7,769,237
Non-marketable equity securities	276,827			267,052			281,714			253,664
Loans held for sale	28,730			36,992			17,655			37,926
Loans (including covered loans of $201,376 at December 31, 2018)	22,358,817			21,977,008
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(114,703		)	(109,931		)
Loans							23,184,278			23,154,988
Allowance for credit losses							(250,579		)	(108,671		)
Loans, net	22,244,114			21,867,077			22,933,699			23,046,317
Bank owned life insurance	272,805			263,340			288,869			282,151
Equipment under operating lease, net	710,209			702,354
Operating lease equipment, net							684,563			698,153
Goodwill and other intangible assets	77,707			77,718			77,663			77,674
Other assets	476,509			400,842			670,209			491,498
Total assets	$	32,702,976		$	32,164,326		$	33,595,671		$	32,871,293

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Demand deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	3,764,713		$	3,621,254		$	4,599,337		$	4,294,824
Interest bearing	1,761,575			1,771,465			2,535,696			2,130,976
Savings and money market	11,386,119			11,261,746			10,323,899			10,621,544
Time	6,766,876			6,819,758			7,541,839			7,347,247
Total deposits	23,679,283			23,474,223			25,000,771			24,394,591
Federal funds purchased	175,000			175,000			—			100,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	5,026,000			4,796,000			5,144,409			4,480,501
Notes and other borrowings	402,701			402,749			428,579			429,338
Other liabilities	496,602			392,521			505,783			486,084
Total liabilities	29,779,586			29,240,493			31,079,542			29,890,514

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 98,404,303 and 99,141,374 shares issued and outstanding	984			991
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 92,406,294 and 95,128,231 shares issued and outstanding							924			951
Paid-in capital	1,179,235			1,220,147			987,757			1,083,920
Retained earnings	1,742,530			1,697,822			1,851,040			1,927,735
Accumulated other comprehensive income	641			4,873
Accumulated other comprehensive loss							(323,592		)	(31,827		)
Total stockholders' equity	2,923,390			2,923,833			2,516,129			2,980,779
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	32,702,976		$	32,164,326		$	33,595,671		$	32,871,293

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019		2018			2020			2019
Interest income:
Loans	$	240,632	$	274,000		$	234,359		$	240,632
Investment securities	76,345		49,985			56,060			76,345
Other	4,852		3,791			3,720			4,852
Total interest income	321,829		327,776			294,139			321,829
Interest expense:
Deposits	97,421		56,361			82,822			97,421
Borrowings	33,507		23,606			30,741			33,507
Total interest expense	130,928		79,967			113,563			130,928
Net interest income before provision for loan losses	190,901		247,809
Provision for loan losses (including $273 for covered loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018)	10,281		3,147
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	180,620		244,662
Net interest income before provision for credit losses						180,576			190,901
Provision for credit losses						125,428			10,281
Net interest income after provision for credit losses						55,148			180,620
Non-interest income:
Income from resolution of covered assets, net	—		3,317
Net loss on FDIC indemnification	—		(3,615		)
Deposit service charges and fees	3,830		3,487			4,186			3,830
Gain on sale of loans, net (including $1,703 related to covered loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018)	2,936		3,501
Gain on investment securities, net	5,785		364
Gain on sale of loans, net						3,466			2,936
Gain (loss) on investment securities, net						(3,453		)	5,785
Lease financing	17,186		14,102			15,481			17,186
Other non-interest income	6,518		6,830			3,618			6,518
Total non-interest income	36,255		27,986			23,298			36,255
Non-interest expense:
Employee compensation and benefits	65,233		67,036			58,887			65,233
Occupancy and equipment	13,166		14,303			12,369			13,166
Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset	—		40,347
Deposit insurance expense	4,041		4,812			4,403			4,041
Professional fees	7,871		2,875			3,204			7,871
Technology and telecommunications	11,168		8,214			12,596			11,168
Depreciation of equipment under operating lease	11,812		9,316
Depreciation of operating lease equipment						12,603			11,812
Other non-interest expense	13,399		14,914			14,806			13,399
Total non-interest expense	126,690		161,817			118,868			126,690
Income before income taxes	90,185		110,831
Provision for income taxes	24,213		25,596
Net income	$	65,972	$	85,235
Earnings per common share, basic	$	0.65	$	0.78
Earnings per common share, diluted	$	0.65	$	0.77
Income (loss) before income taxes						(40,422		)	90,185
Provision (benefit) for income taxes						(9,471		)	24,213
Net income (loss)						$	(30,951	)	$	65,972
Earnings (loss) per common share, basic						$	(0.33	)	$	0.65
Earnings (loss) per common share, diluted						$	(0.33	)	$	0.65

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019

Net income	$	65,972		$	85,235
Net income (loss)							$	(30,951	)	$	65,972
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	21,617			(27,324		)	(213,160		)	21,617
Reclassification adjustment for net securities (gains) losses realized in income	(3,173		)	(717		)
Reclassification adjustment for net securities gains realized in income							(1,140		)	(3,173		)
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale	18,444			(28,041		)	(214,300		)	18,444
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	(20,675		)	19,793
Net unrealized holding loss arising during the period							(80,814		)	(20,675		)
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses realized in income	(2,001		)	690			3,349			(2,001		)
Net change in unrealized loss on derivative instruments	(22,676		)	20,483
Net change in unrealized losses on derivative instruments							(77,465		)	(22,676		)
Other comprehensive loss	(4,232		)	(7,558		)	(291,765		)	(4,232		)
Comprehensive income	$	61,740		$	77,677
Comprehensive income (loss)							$	(322,716	)	$	61,740

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	65,972		$	85,235
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss)							$	(30,951	)	$	65,972
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and accretion, net	(11,418		)	(34,053		)	(5,520		)	(11,418		)
Provision for loan losses	10,281			3,147
Income from resolution of covered assets, net	—			(3,317		)
Net loss on FDIC indemnification	—			3,615
Provision for credit losses							125,428			10,281
Gain on sale of loans, net	(2,936		)	(3,501		)	(3,466		)	(2,936		)
Gain on investment securities, net	(5,785		)	(364		)
(Gain) loss on investment securities, net							3,453			(5,785		)
Equity based compensation	6,473			6,783			3,637			6,473
Depreciation and amortization	18,171			15,632			10,319			18,171
Deferred income taxes	(1,972		)	13,320			945			(1,972		)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale	107,216			25,407			191,783			107,216
Loans originated for sale, net of repayments	(27,177		)	(36,730		)	(13,036		)	(27,177		)
Other:
Decrease in other assets	293			5,246
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities	(70,599		)	57,674
(Increase) decrease in other assets							(25,028		)	293
Decrease in other liabilities							(194,044		)	(70,599		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	88,519			138,094			63,520			88,519

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities	(1,169,104		)	(637,171		)	(945,793		)	(1,169,104		)
Proceeds from repayments and calls of investment securities	273,112			272,360			282,822			273,112
Proceeds from sale of investment securities	775,723			266,930			306,532			775,723
Purchase of non-marketable equity securities	(88,188		)	(64,813		)	(79,688		)	(88,188		)
Proceeds from redemption of non-marketable equity securities	78,413			80,750			51,638			78,413
Purchases of loans	(305,354		)	(332,966		)	(502,628		)	(305,354		)
Loan originations, repayments and resolutions, net	(147,435		)	289,823			309,963			(147,435		)
Proceeds from sale of loans, net	8,334			62,185			9,332			8,334
Proceeds from sale of equipment under operating lease	2,873			13,405
Acquisition of equipment under operating lease	(22,400		)	(14,035		)
Acquisition of operating lease equipment							—			(22,400		)
Other investing activities	(15,471		)	(12,937		)	(11,641		)	(12,598		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(609,497		)	(76,469		)	(579,463		)	(609,497		)
				(Continued)						(Continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS ~~- UNAUDITED~~ (Continued)

(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	205,060			361,169			606,180			205,060
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased							(100,000		)	—
Additions to Federal Home Loan Bank advances	1,281,000			1,201,000			1,746,000			1,281,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(1,051,000		)	(1,576,000		)	(1,086,000		)	(1,051,000		)
Dividends paid	(21,673		)	(23,055		)	(20,775		)	(21,673		)
Repurchase of common stock	(39,974		)	(48,632		)	(100,972		)	(39,974		)
Other financing activities	6,943			29,061			23,535			6,943
Net cash provided by financing activities	380,356			(56,457		)	1,067,968			380,356
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(140,622		)	5,168
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents							552,025			(140,622		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	382,073			194,582			214,673			382,073
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	241,451		$	199,750		$	766,698		$	241,451

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	121,652		$	73,906		$	111,191		$	121,652
Income taxes paid, net	$	6,104		$	18,092		$	4,891		$	6,104

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned and other repossessed assets							$	4,096		$	—
Transfers from loans to loans held for sale	$	69,559		$	—		$	164,293		$	69,559
Dividends declared, not paid	$	21,264		$	22,940		$	21,927		$	21,264
Unsettled purchases of investment securities	$	50,000		$	47,760
Unsettled sales and purchases of investment securities, net							$	43,692		$	50,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except share data)



	Common Shares Outstanding		Common Stock			Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019	95,128,231		$	951		$	1,083,920		$	1,927,735		$	(31,827	)	$	2,980,779
Impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13	—		—			—			(23,817		)	—			(23,817		)
Comprehensive loss	—		—			—			(30,951		)	(291,765		)	(322,716		)
Dividends ($0.23 per common share)	—		—			—			(21,927		)	—			(21,927		)
Equity based compensation	687,008		7			7,666			—			—			7,673
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations	(143,368	)	(2		)	(4,418		)	—			—			(4,420		)
Exercise of stock options	60,000		1			1,528			—			—			1,529
Repurchase of common stock	(3,325,577	)	(33		)	(100,939		)	—			—			(100,972		)
Balance at March 31, 2020	92,406,294		$	924		$	987,757		$	1,851,040		$	(323,592	)	$	2,516,129

Balance at December 31, 2018	99,141,374		$	991		$	1,220,147		$	1,697,822		$	4,873		$	2,923,833
Comprehensive income	—		—			—			65,972			(4,232		)	61,740
Dividends ($0.21 per common share)	—		—			—			(21,264		)	—			(21,264		)
Equity based compensation	563,970		6			5,083			—			—			5,089
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations	(191,866	)	(2		)	(6,076		)	—			—			(6,078		)
Exercise of stock options	3,910		—			44			—			—			44
Repurchase of common stock	(1,113,085	)	(11		)	(39,963		)	—			—			(39,974		)
Balance at March 31, 2019	98,404,303		$	984		$	1,179,235		$	1,742,530		$	641		$	2,923,390

Common
Shares
Outstanding

Common
Stock

Paid-in
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2018 99,141,374
$ 991
$ 1,220,147
$ 1,697,822
$ 4,873
$ 2,923,833
Comprehensive income —
—
—
65,972
(4,232 ) 61,740
Dividends ($0.21 per common share) —
—
—
(21,264 ) —
(21,264 )
Equity based compensation 563,970
6
5,083
—
—
5,089
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations (191,866 ) (2 ) (6,076 ) —
—
(6,078 )
Exercise of stock options 3,910
—
44
—
—
44
Repurchase of common stock (1,113,085 ) (11 ) (39,963 ) —
—
(39,974 )
Balance at March 31, 2019 98,404,303
$ 984
$ 1,179,235
$ 1,742,530
$ 641
$ 2,923,390

Balance at December 31, 2017 106,848,185
$ 1,068
$ 1,498,227
$ 1,471,781
$ 54,986
$ 3,026,062
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standards —
—
—
(8,902 ) 8,902
—
Comprehensive income —
—
—
85,235
(7,558 ) 77,677
Dividends ($0.21 per common share) —
—
—
(22,940 ) —
(22,940 )
Equity based compensation 640,040
6
5,378
—
—
5,384
Forfeiture of unvested shares and shares surrendered for tax withholding obligations (167,534 ) (2 ) (5,969 ) —
—
(5,971 )
Exercise of stock options 40,500
1
1,091
—
—
1,092
Repurchase of common stock (1,200,440 ) (12 ) (48,620 ) —
—
(48,632 )
Balance at March 31, 2018 106,160,751
$ 1,061
$ 1,450,107
$ 1,525,174
$ 56,330
$ 3,032,672

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BankUnited, Inc. is a national bank holding company with one wholly-owned subsidiary, BankUnited, collectively, the Company. BankUnited, a national banking association headquartered in Miami Lakes, Florida, provides a full range of banking and related services to individual and corporate customers through 8074 banking centers located in 14 Florida counties and 5 banking centers located in the New York metropolitan area at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The Bank also offers certain commercial lending and deposit products through national platforms.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Accordingly, these do not include all of the information and footnotes required for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in BKU’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods.

Certain amounts presented for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Accounting Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Significant estimates include the ~~ALLL~~allowance for credit losses and the fair values of investment securities and other financial instruments.

New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020

ASU No. ~~2016-02,~~ 2016-13, F~~Leases (Topic 842).~~ The amendments in this ASU, along with subsequent ASUs issued to clarify certain provisions of Topic 842, require a lessee to recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for leases with terms longer than one year. Accounting applied by lessors was largely unchanged by this ASU. The ASU also requires both qualitative and quantitative disclosures that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The amendments in this ASU were effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The most significant impact of adoption was the recognition, as lessee, of new right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for real estate leases classified as operating leases. Under a package of practical expedients that the Company elected, as lessee and lessor, the Company did not have to (i) re-assess whether expired or existing contracts contain leases, (ii) re-assess the classification of expired or existing leases, (iii) re-evaluate initial direct costs for existing leases or (iv) separate lease components of certain contracts from non-lease components. The Company also elected the transition method that allows entities the option of applying the provisions of the ASU at the effective date without adjusting the comparative periods presented. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method. The Company recognized a lease liability and related right of use asset of approximately $104 million and $95 million, respectively, upon adoption on January 1, 2019.

~~ASU No. 2018-16,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes~~. The ASU added the OIS rate based on SOFR as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. The ASU was effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2019 with no impact at adoption to its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted~~

~~In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,~~ ~~Financial~~inancial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326); Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ~~This~~The ASU, along with subsequent ASUs issued to clarify certain of its provisions, ~~including ASU No. 2019-04 issued in April, 2019, introduces~~introduced new guidance which ~~makes~~made substantive changes to the accounting

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

for credit losses. The ASU ~~introduces~~introduced the CECL model which applies to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, as well as certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes loans, loan commitments, standby letters of credit, net investments in leases recognized by a lessor and HTM debt securities. The CECL model requires an entity to estimate credit losses expected over the life of an exposure, considering information about historical events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, and is generally expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The ASU also ~~modifies~~modified certain provisions of the ~~current~~previous OTTI model for AFS debt securities. Credit losses on AFS debt securities ~~will be~~are now limited to the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and its fair value, and ~~will~~should be recognized through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a direct reduction in amortized cost basis. The Company adopted this ASU ~~also~~in the first quarter of 2020 using the modified retrospective transition method for the CECL model and a prospective approach for the AFS debt security model. The Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of $23.8 million, which included $4.8 million related to off -balance sheet credit exposures, on January 1, 2020. No cumulative-effect adjustment was recorded related to AFS debt securities upon adoption. The Company has elected to phase-in the initial impact of the adoption of ASC 326 for regulatory capital purposes, allowing the impact of adoption on regulatory capital to be delayed for two years, followed by a three-year transition period.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The ASU provides optional relief for a ~~simplified~~limited period of time to ease the potential accounting ~~model~~burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates that are expected to be discontinued. Under this ASU, companies are provided with optional expedients and exceptions for ~~purchased financial assets with more than insignificant credit deterioration since~~applying generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to contract modifications and hedging relationships that currently utilize LIBOR as their ~~origination. The ASU requires expanded disclosures including, but not limited~~benchmark rate, subject to (i) information about the methods and assumptions used to estimate expected credit losses, including changes in the factors that influenced management's estimate and the reasons for those changes, (ii) for financing receivables and net investment in leases measured at amortized cost, further disaggregation of information about the credit quality of those assets and (iii) a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses for AFS and HTM securities.certain criteria being met. The amendments in the ASU also apply to contemporaneous modifications of other contract terms related to the replacement of LIBOR. The amendments in the ASU are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 and will only be in effect through December 31, 2022. To date, the impact of adoption of this ASU ~~are~~on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows has not been material.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions stipulated in ASC 740 and making some other targeted changes to the accounting for income taxes. This ASU is effective for the Company for interim and annual periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2019. Early adoption is permitted; however, the~~2020. The Company ~~does~~has not ~~intend to early adopt this ASU. Management is in the process~~finalized its evaluation of ~~evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements, processes and controls and is not currently able to reasonably estimate~~ the impact of adoption on ~~the Company's~~its consolidated financial position, results of operations, orand cash ~~flows; however, adoption will lead to significant changes in accounting policies related to, and the methods employed in estimating, the ALLL. It is possible that~~flows, but the impact ~~will~~is not currently expected to be ~~material~~material.

Updates to the Company's ~~consolidated financial position~~Significant Accounting Policies

Loans

The Company's loan portfolio contains 1-4 single family residential first mortgages, government insured residential mortgages, an insignificant amount of home equity loans and ~~results~~lines of ~~operations. To date,~~credit and other consumer loans; multi-family, non-owner occupied commercial real estate, construction and land, owner-occupied commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, mortgage warehouse lines of credit and sales-type and direct financing leases. Loans are reported at amortized cost basis, net of the ~~Company~~ACL.

Interest income is accrued based on the principal amount outstanding. Non-refundable loan origination fees, net of direct costs of originating or acquiring loans, as well as purchase premiums and discounts, are deferred and recognized as adjustments to yield over the contractual lives of the related loans using the level yield method.

Non-accrual loans

Commercial loans are placed on non-accrual status when (i) management has ~~completed a gap analysis, adopted~~determined that full repayment of all contractual principal and interest is in doubt, or (ii) the loan is past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest unless the loan is well secured and in the process of ~~executing~~collection. Residential and other consumer loans, other than government insured residential loans, are generally placed on non-accrual status when they are 90 days past due. When a ~~detailed implementation plan, established~~loan is placed on non-accrual status, uncollected interest accrued is reversed and charged to interest income. Payments received on nonaccrual commercial loans are applied as a ~~formal governance structure, selected~~reduction of principal. Interest payments are recognized as income on a cash basis on nonaccrual residential loans. Commercial loans are returned to accrual status only after all past due principal and ~~implemented credit loss models for key portfolio segments, chosen loss estimation methodologies for key portfolio segments, implemented a software solution~~interest has been collected and full repayment of remaining contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured. Residential and consumer loans are generally returned to ~~serve as its CECL platform, and initiated a "parallel run"~~accrual status when less than 90 days past due. Past due status of ~~the CECL estimation process.~~

~~Leases~~

~~The Company determines whether a contract~~loans is or contains a lease at inception. For leases with terms greater than twelve months under which the Company is lessee, ROU assets and lease liabilities are recorded at the commencement date. Lease liabilities are initially recordeddetermined based on the ~~present value~~contractual next payment due date. Loans less than 30 days past due are reported as current.

Contractually delinquent government insured residential loans are not classified as non-accrual due to the nature of ~~future lease payments over~~ the ~~lease term. ROU assets~~guarantee. Contractually delinquent PCD loans are ~~initially recorded~~not classified as non-accrual as long as the Company has a reasonable expectation about amounts expected to be collected.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In certain situations, due to economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, the Company may grant a concession to the borrower for other than an insignificant period of time that it would not otherwise consider. At that time, the related loan is classified as a TDR. The concessions granted may include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, payment forbearance, extensions of maturity at rates of interest below that commensurate with the risk profile of the loans, modification of payment terms and other actions intended to minimize economic loss. A TDR is generally placed on non-accrual status at the ~~amount~~time of the ~~associated lease liabilities plus prepaid lease payments and initial direct costs, less any lease incentives received. The cost~~modification unless the borrower was performing prior to the restructuring.

Table of short term leases is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease term. The lease term includes options to extend if the exercise of those options is reasonably certain and includes termination options if there is reasonable certainty the options will not be exercised. Lease payments are discounted using the Company's FHLB borrowing rate for borrowings of a similar term unless an implicit rate is defined in the contract or is determinable, which is generally not the case. Leases are classified as financing or operating leases at commencement; generally, leases are classified as finance leases when effective control of the underlying asset is transferred. The substantial majority of leases under which the Company is lessee are classified as operating leases. For operating leases, lease cost is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income on a straight line basis over the lease terms. For finance leases, interest expense on lease liabilities is recognized on the effective interest method and amortization of ROU assets is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease terms. Variable lease costs are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those costs is incurred. The Company has elected not to separate lease from non-lease components of its lease contracts.Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Purchased Credit Deteriorated ("PCD") assets

PCD assets are acquired financial assets that, as of the date of acquisition, have experienced a more than insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. An assessment is conducted at acquisition to determine whether acquired financial assets meet the criteria to be classified as PCD assets. That assessment may be conducted at the individual asset level, or for a group of assets acquired together that have similar risk characteristics. At acquisition, the ACL related to PCD assets, representing the estimated amount of the UPB of the assets not expected to be collected, is added to the purchase price to determine the amortized cost basis and any non-credit related discount or premium is allocated to the individual assets acquired. The non-credit related discount or premium is accreted or amortized to interest income over the life of the related assets using the level yield method, as long as there is a reasonable expectation about amounts expected to be collected. Subsequent changes in the amount of expected credit losses are recognized immediately by adjusting the ACL and reflecting the periodic changes as credit loss expense or reversal of credit loss expense.

Loans previously categorized as ACI loans were categorized as PCD loans on initial adoption of ASC 326. At adoption, an ACL was recognized and a corresponding adjustment was made to the assets' amortized cost basis. Prior to the adoption of ASC 326, ACI loans were accounted for on a pool basis. These pools were not maintained on adoption. The Company did not re-assess whether modifications to individual PCD loans previously accounted for in pools were TDRs at adoption.

Allowance for Credit Losses ("ACL")

AFS Debt Securities

The Company reviews its AFS debt securities for credit loss impairment at the individual security level on at least a quarterly basis. A security is impaired if its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. A decline in fair value below amortized cost basis represents a credit loss impairment to the extent the Company does not expect to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. Impairment related to credit losses is recorded through the ACL to the extent fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Declines in fair value that have not been recorded through the ACL are recorded through other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.

In assessing whether an impairment is credit loss related, the Company compares the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to the security's amortized cost basis. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis of the security, a credit loss exists and an ACL is recorded. The Company discounts expected cash flows at the effective interest rate implicit in the security at the purchase date, adjusted for expected prepayments. For floating rate securities, the Company uses the floating rate as it changes over the life of the security. In developing estimates about cash flows expected to be collected and determining whether a credit loss exists, the Company considers information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Factors and information that the Company uses in making its assessments include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

The extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost;

Adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry or geographic area;

Changes in the financial condition of the issuer or underlying loan obligors;

The payment structure and remaining payment terms of the security, including levels of subordination or over-collateralization;

Failure of the issuer to make scheduled payments;

Changes in credit ratings;

Relevant market data;

Estimated prepayments, defaults, and the value and performance of underlying collateral at the individual security level.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

The relative importance assigned to each of these factors varies depending on the facts and circumstances pertinent to the individual security being evaluated.

Timely payment of principal and interest on securities issued by the U.S. Government, U.S. government agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U. S. government. Therefore, the Company expects to recover the amortized cost basis of these securities.

If the Company intends to sell a security in an unrealized loss position, or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses will be written off and the amortized cost basis will be written down to the debt security’s fair value at the reporting date with any incremental impairment reported in earnings.

Historically, the Company has not experienced credit losses related to AFS securities or uncollectible interest on its AFS securities. However, AFS securities would be charged off to the extent that there was no reasonable expectation of recovery of amortized cost basis. AFS securities would be placed on non-accrual status if the Company did not reasonably expect to receive interest payments in the future and interest accrued would be reversed against interest income. Securities would be returned to accrual status only when collection of interest was reasonably assured.

Loans

The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected. The ACL is adjusted through the provision for credit losses to the amount of amortized cost basis not expected to be collected, or in the case of PCD loans, the amount of UPB not expected to be collected, at the balance sheet date. Amortized cost basis includes UPB, unamortized premiums or discounts and deferred fees and costs, net of amounts previously charged off.

The measurement of expected credit losses encompasses information about historical events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Determining the amount of the ACL is complex and requires extensive judgment by management about matters that are inherently uncertain. Re-evaluation of the ACL estimate in future periods, in light of changes in composition and characteristics of the loan portfolio, changes in the reasonable and supportable forecast and other factors then prevailing may result in material changes in the amount of the ACL and credit loss expense in those future periods.

Loans are charged off against the ACL in the period in which they are deemed uncollectible and recoveries are credited to the ACL when received. Expected recoveries on loans previously charged off, not to exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off, are included in the ACL estimate. For loans secured by residential real estate, an assessment of collateral value is made at no later than 120 days delinquency; any outstanding loan balance in excess of fair value less cost to sell is charged off at no later than 180 days delinquency. Additionally, any outstanding balance in excess of fair value of collateral less cost to sell is charged off (i) within 60 days of receipt of notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, (ii) within 60 days of determination of loss if all borrowers are deceased or (iii) within 90 days of discovery of fraudulent activity. Other consumer loans are typically charged off at 120 days delinquency. Commercial loans are charged off when, in management's judgment, they are considered to be uncollectible.

Expected credit losses are estimated on a collective basis for groups of loans that share similar risk characteristics. Factors that may be considered in aggregating loans for this purpose include but are not necessarily limited to, product or collateral type, industry, geography, internal risk rating, credit characteristics such as credit scores or collateral values, and historical or expected credit loss patterns. For loans that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans such as collateral dependent loans and TDRs, expected credit losses are estimated on an individual basis.

Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual terms of the loans, adjusted for expected prepayments. Expected prepayments for commercial loans are generally estimated based on the Company's historical experience. For residential loans, expected prepayments are estimated using a model that incorporates industry prepayment data, calibrated to reflect the Company's experience. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a TDR will be executed with an individual borrower or the extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancellable by the Company.

The Company has elected a 5-year reasonable and supportable forecast period, with mean reversion occurring within the credit loss models based on the economic inputs. The length of the reasonable and supportable forecast is evaluated at each reporting period and adjusted if deemed necessary.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

For the substantial majority of portfolio segments and subsegments, including residential loans other than government insured loans, and most commercial and commercial real estate loans, expected losses are estimated using econometric models. The models employ a factor based methodology, leveraging data sets containing extensive historical loss and recovery information by industry, geography, product type, collateral type and obligor characteristics, to estimate PD and LGD. Measures of PD for commercial loans incorporate current conditions through market cycle or credit cycle adjustments. For residential loans, the models consider FICO and adjusted LTVs. PDs and LGDs are then conditioned on the reasonable and supportable economic forecast. Projected PDs and LGDs are applied to estimated exposure at default, considering the term and payment structure of the loan, to generate estimates of expected loss at the loan level. For criticized or classified loans, PDs may be adjusted to industry benchmark PDs appropriate to the current risk rating if the most current financial information available is deemed not to be reflective of the borrowers' current financial condition. These loan level estimates are aggregated to generate a collective estimate for groups of loans that share common risk characteristics.

For certain less material portfolios including loans and leases to state and local government entities originated by Pinnacle, small balance commercial loans and consumer loans, the WARM method is used to estimate expected credit losses. For the Pinnacle portfolio, historical loss information is based on municipal historical default and recovery data, segmented by credit rating. For small balance commercial loans, historical loss information is based on the Company's historical loss experience over a five year period. For consumer loans, historical loss information is based on peer data; this portfolio subsegment is not significant. All loss estimates are conditioned as applicable on changes in current conditions and the reasonable and supportable economic forecast. Expected credit losses for mortgage warehouse lines of credit are estimated based primarily on the Company's historical loss experience, conditioned as applicable on changes in current conditions and the reasonable and supportable economic forecast. Generally, given the nature of these loans, losses would be expected to manifest within a very short time period after origination.

The Company expects to collect the amortized cost basis of government insured residential loans due to the nature of the government guarantee, so the quantitative ACL is zero for these loans.

Qualitative factors

Qualitative adjustments are made to the ACL when, based on management’s judgment, there are factors impacting expected credit losses not taken into account by the quantitative calculations. Potential qualitative adjustments are categorized as follows:

Economic factors, including material trends and developments that, in management's judgment, may not have been considered in the reasonable and supportable economic forecast;

Credit policy and staffing, including the nature and level of policy and procedural exceptions or changes in credit policy not reflected in quantitative results, changes in the quality of underwriting and portfolio management and staff and issues identified by credit review, internal audit or regulators that may not be reflected in quantitative results;

Concentrations, considering whether the quantitative estimate adequately accounts for concentration risk in the portfolio;

Model imprecision and model validation findings; and

Other factors not adequately considered in the quantitative estimate or other qualitative categories identified by management that may materially impact the amount of expected credit losses.

Collateral dependent loans

Collateral dependent loans are those for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral. These loans do not typically share similar risk characteristics with other loans and expected credit losses are evaluated on an individual basis. Loans evaluated individually are not included in the collective evaluation. Estimates of expected credit losses for collateral dependent loans, whether or not foreclosure is probable, are based on the fair value of the collateral adjusted for selling costs when repayment depends on sale of the collateral.

Troubled debt restructurings

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

For TDRs, or loans for which there is a reasonable expectation that a TDR will be executed, that are not collateral dependent, the credit loss estimate is determined by comparing the net present value of expected cash flows, discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, to the amortized cost basis of the loan.

Off-balance sheet credit exposures

Expected credit losses related to off-balance sheet credit exposures are estimated over the contractual period for which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. Expected credit losses are estimated using essentially the same methodologies employed to estimate expected credit losses on the amortized cost basis of loans, taking into consideration the likelihood and amount of additional amounts expected to be funded over the terms of the commitments. The liability for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is presented within other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, distinct from the ACL. Adjustments to the liability are included in the provision for credit losses.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The Company has elected to present accrued interest receivable separate from the amortized cost basis of financial assets carried at amortized cost. The Company is applying the practical expedient provided in ASC 326 to exclude accrued interest receivable balances from tabular disclosures about financial assets carried at amortized cost and has elected not to estimate an ACL on accrued interest receivable since uncollectible accrued interest is timely written off in accordance with the Company's accounting policies for non-accrual loans.

Note 2 Earnings Per Common Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share is presented below for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):

Three Months Ended March 31,
c 2019
2018
Basic earnings per common share:

Numerator:

Net income $ 65,972
$ 85,235
Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities (2,697 ) (3,216 )
Income allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share $ 63,275
$ 82,019
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding 98,856,775
106,525,883
Less average unvested stock awards (1,171,921 ) (1,108,434 )
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per common share 97,684,854
105,417,449
Basic earnings per common share $ 0.65
$ 0.78
Diluted earnings per common share:
Numerator:
Income allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share $ 63,275
$ 82,019
Adjustment for earnings reallocated from participating securities 5
11
Income used in calculating diluted earnings per common share $ 63,280
$ 82,030
Denominator:
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per common share 97,684,854
105,417,449
Dilutive effect of stock options and certain share-based awards 279,779
516,161
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share 97,964,633
105,933,610
Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.65
$ 0.77



	Three Months Ended March 31,
c	2020			2019
Basic earnings per common share:
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(30,951	)	$	65,972
Distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities	—			(2,697		)
Income (loss) allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share	$	(30,951	)	$	63,275
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	93,944,529			98,856,775
Less average unvested stock awards	(1,101,370		)	(1,171,921		)
Weighted average shares for basic earnings (loss) per common share	92,843,159			97,684,854
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.33	)	$	0.65
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Numerator:
Income (loss) allocated to common stockholders for basic earnings per common share	$	(30,951	)	$	63,275
Adjustment for earnings reallocated from participating securities	—			5
Income (loss) used in calculating diluted earnings per common share	$	(30,951	)	$	63,280
Denominator:
Weighted average shares for basic earnings (loss) per common share	92,843,159			97,684,854
Dilutive effect of stock options and certain shared-based awards	—			279,779
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings (loss) per common share	92,843,159			97,964,633
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.33	)	$	0.65

~~Included in participating~~

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

Participating securities ~~above are~~include unvested shares and 3,023,314 dividend equivalent rights ~~outstanding at March 31, 2019~~ that were issued in conjunction with the IPO of the Company's common stock. These dividend equivalent rights expire in 2021 and participate in dividends on a one-for-one basis. Participating securities have the right to participate in the earnings of the Company, but no contractual obligation to share in losses. As a result, these securities impacted the calculation of earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2019 but did not impact the calculation of loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

~~The following potentially~~Potentially dilutive ~~securities~~unvested shares and share units totaling 1,768,769 and 1,218,840 were outstanding at March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018~~respectively, but excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share ~~for the periods indicated~~ because their inclusion would have been ~~anti-dilutive:~~anti-dilutive.

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Unvested shares and share units 1,218,840
1,614,379
Stock options and warrants —
1,850,279

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

Note 3 Investment Securities

Investment securities include investment securities available for sale, marketable equity securities, and investment securities held to maturity. The investment securities portfolio consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):

March 31, 2019
Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized
Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾
Gains Losses
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities $ 34,879
$ 15
$ (4 ) $ 34,890
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS 2,087,465
13,754
(5,226 ) 2,095,993
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS 437,854
1,904
(427 ) 439,331
Private label residential MBS and CMOs 1,625,348
16,094
(8,044 ) 1,633,398
Private label commercial MBS 1,477,465
6,032
(2,015 ) 1,481,482
Single family rental real estate-backed securities 413,318
2,789
(1,223 ) 414,884
Collateralized loan obligations 1,230,643
378
(10,796 ) 1,220,225
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities 145,296
1,213
(652 ) 145,857
State and municipal obligations 374,314
10,171
(188 ) 384,297
SBA securities 443,864
6,179
(2,574 ) 447,469
Other debt securities 1,400
3,418
—
4,818
8,271,846
$ 61,947
$ (31,149 ) 8,302,644
Marketable equity securities 61,980
61,980
Investment securities held to maturity 10,000
10,000
$ 8,343,826
$ 8,374,624

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~



	March 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	75,238	$	1,092	$	(176	)	$	76,154
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	2,209,715		5,168		(33,985		)	2,180,898
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	369,967		7,276		(751		)	376,492
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	1,185,539		5,081		(16,740		)	1,173,880
Private label commercial MBS	1,728,610		3,293		(127,089		)	1,604,814
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	549,981		1,331		(22,519		)	528,793
Collateralized loan obligations	1,169,469		—		(74,676		)	1,094,793
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	265,444		392		(10,675		)	255,161
State and municipal obligations	255,602		15,431		—			271,033
SBA securities	262,661		2,320		(4,593		)	260,388
	8,072,226		$	41,384	$	(291,204	)	7,822,406
Investment securities held to maturity	10,000							10,000
	$	8,082,226						7,832,406
Marketable equity securities								42,195
								$	7,874,601


	December 31, 2018									December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾		Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized					Carrying Value ⁽¹⁾
			Gains		Losses								Gains		Losses
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	39,885	$	2	$	(14	)	$	39,873	$	70,243		$	219	$	(137	)	$	70,325
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	1,885,302		16,580		(4,408		)	1,897,474		2,018,853			9,835		(6,513		)	2,022,175
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	374,569		1,293		(1,075		)	374,787		366,787		��	4,920		(731		)	370,976
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	1,539,058		10,138		(14,998		)	1,534,198		1,001,337			11,851		(1,011		)	1,012,177
Private label commercial MBS	1,486,835		5,021		(6,140		)	1,485,716		1,719,228			6,650		(1,194		)	1,724,684
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	406,310		266		(4,118		)	402,458		467,459			4,016		(1,450		)	470,025
Collateralized loan obligations	1,239,355		1,060		(5,217		)	1,235,198		1,204,905			322		(7,861		)	1,197,366
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	204,372		1,031		(1,336		)	204,067		194,171			1,780		(1,047		)	194,904
State and municipal obligations	398,810		3,684		(4,065		)	398,429		257,528			15,774		—			273,302
SBA securities	514,765		6,502		(1,954		)	519,313		359,808			4,587		(1,664		)	362,731
Other debt securities	1,393		3,453		—			4,846
										7,660,319			$	59,954	$	(21,608	)	7,698,665
Investment securities held to maturity										10,000								10,000
	8,090,654		$	49,030	$	(43,325	)	8,096,359		$	7,670,319							7,708,665
Marketable equity securities	60,519							60,519										60,572
Investment securities held to maturity	10,000							10,000
	$	8,161,173						$	8,166,878									$	7,769,237


(1)	At fair value except for securities held to maturity.

Investment securities held to maturity at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 consisted of ~~one~~1 State of Israel bond maturing in 2024. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, accrued interest receivable on investments totaled $24 million and $28 million, respectively, and is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, contractual maturities of investment securities available for sale, adjusted for anticipated prepayments when applicable, were as follows (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	853,102	$	858,326	$	864,668	$	857,621
Due after one year through five years	4,244,326		4,252,774		4,498,791		4,298,586
Due after five years through ten years	2,739,544		2,751,940		2,289,908		2,248,496
Due after ten years	434,874		439,604		418,859		417,703
	$	8,271,846	$	8,302,644	$	8,072,226	$	7,822,406

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral for FHLB advances, public deposits, interest rate swaps and to secure borrowing capacity at the FRB totaled ~~$2.2~~$6.8 billion and ~~$2.1~~$2.4 billion at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

The following table provides information about gains and losses on investment securities for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale	$	775,723		$	266,930		$	306,532		$	775,723

Gross realized gains:
Investment securities available for sale	$	4,325		$	3,488		$	1,532		$	4,325
Gross realized losses:
Investment securities available for sale	(8		)	(2,511		)	(2		)	(8		)
Net realized gain	4,317			977			1,530			4,317

Net unrealized gains (losses) on marketable equity securities recognized in earnings	1,468			(613		)	(4,983		)	1,468

Gain on investment securities, net	$	5,785		$	364
Gain (loss) on investment securities, net							$	(3,453	)	$	5,785

The following tables present the aggregate fair value and the aggregate amount by which amortized cost exceeded fair value for investment securities available for sale in unrealized loss positions aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities had been in continuous unrealized loss positions at the dates indicated (in thousands):. No ACL was recorded for any investment securities available for sale in unrealized loss positions at March 31, 2020.


	March 31, 2019															March 31, 2020
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total					Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	14,970	$	(4	)	$	—	$	—		$	14,970	$	(4	)	$	20,007	$	(176	)	$	—	$	—		$	20,007	$	(176	)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	834,444		(3,292		)	148,726		(1,934		)	983,170		(5,226		)	1,351,831		(19,853		)	451,047		(14,132		)	1,802,878		(33,985		)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	110,731		(102		)	21,068		(325		)	131,799		(427		)	77,388		(376		)	28,515		(375		)	105,903		(751		)
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	274,794		(1,099		)	388,733		(6,945		)	663,527		(8,044		)	737,624		(16,740		)	—		—			737,624		(16,740		)
Private label commercial MBS	531,170		(1,576		)	74,364		(439		)	605,534		(2,015		)	1,293,216		(122,960		)	44,861		(4,129		)	1,338,077		(127,089		)
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	98,051		(257		)	100,675		(966		)	198,726		(1,223		)	460,048		(22,518		)	1,967		(1		)	462,015		(22,519		)
Collateralized loan obligations	1,000,974		(10,796		)	—		—			1,000,974		(10,796		)	572,725		(34,562		)	522,068		(40,114		)	1,094,793		(74,676		)
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	40,567		(45		)	66,316		(607		)	106,883		(652		)	223,395		(9,292		)	6,143		(1,383		)	229,538		(10,675		)
State and municipal obligations	—		—			29,108		(188		)	29,108		(188		)
SBA securities	106,738		(1,290		)	74,100		(1,284		)	180,838		(2,574		)	48,894		(498		)	117,320		(4,095		)	166,214		(4,593		)
	$	3,012,439	$	(18,461	)	$	903,090	$	(12,688	)	$	3,915,529	$	(31,149	)	$	4,785,128	$	(226,975	)	$	1,171,921	$	(64,229	)	$	5,957,049	$	(291,204	)

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020


	December 31, 2018															December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total					Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Greater					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	14,921	$	(14	)	$	—	$	—		$	14,921	$	(14	)	$	20,056	$	(137	)	$	—	$	—		$	20,056	$	(137	)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	450,666		(1,828		)	87,311		(2,580		)	537,977		(4,408		)	579,076		(3,862		)	243,839		(2,651		)	822,915		(6,513		)
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	146,096		(352		)	25,815		(723		)	171,911		(1,075		)	99,610		(696		)	6,477		(35		)	106,087		(731		)
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	759,921		(7,073		)	278,108		(7,925		)	1,038,029		(14,998		)	180,398		(838		)	41,636		(173		)	222,034		(1,011		)
Private label commercial MBS	742,092		(5,371		)	39,531		(769		)	781,623		(6,140		)	648,761		(1,060		)	76,302		(134		)	725,063		(1,194		)
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	234,305		(1,973		)	85,282		(2,145		)	319,587		(4,118		)	241,915		(1,445		)	5,460		(5		)	247,375		(1,450		)
Collateralized loan obligations	749,047		(5,217		)	—		—			749,047		(5,217		)	63,310		(846		)	682,076		(7,015		)	745,386		(7,861		)
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	136,100		(1,336		)	—		—			136,100		(1,336		)	78,964		(962		)	7,883		(85		)	86,847		(1,047		)
State and municipal obligations	208,971		(3,522		)	46,247		(543		)	255,218		(4,065		)
SBA securities	215,975		(1,391		)	31,481		(563		)	247,456		(1,954		)	10,236		(2		)	142,204		(1,662		)	152,440		(1,664		)
	$	3,658,094	$	(28,077	)	$	593,775	$	(15,248	)	$	4,251,869	$	(43,325	)	$	1,922,326	$	(9,848	)	$	1,205,877	$	(11,760	)	$	3,128,203	$	(21,608	)

The Company monitors its investment securities available for sale for ~~OTTI~~credit loss impairment on an individual security basis. No securities were determined to be ~~other-than-temporarily~~credit loss impaired during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 or ~~2018.~~other than temporarily impaired during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The Company does not intend to sell securities that are in significant unrealized loss positions at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of the amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. In making this determination, the Company considered its current and projected liquidity position, its investment policy as to permissible holdings and concentration limits, regulatory requirements and other relevant factors.

At March 31, ~~2019, 191~~2020, 314 securities available for sale were in unrealized loss positions. The amount of impairment related to 5929 of these securities was considered insignificant both individually and in the aggregate, totaling approximately ~~$628~~$285 thousand and no further analysis with respect to these securities was considered necessary.

Unrealized losses at March 31, 2020 were primarily attributable to widening spreads, resulting in large part from market response to, and dislocation in the wake of, the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. The basis for concluding that ~~impairment of the remaining~~AFS securities were not credit loss impaired and no ACL was ~~not other-than-temporary~~considered necessary at March 31, 2020 is described further ~~described~~ below.

U.S. Government, ~~agency~~Government Agency and ~~sponsored enterprise residential and commercialMBS~~Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities

At March 31, ~~2019, thirty-six~~2020, 1 U.S Treasury security, NaN U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS, ~~and two~~5 U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS and 13 SBA securities were in unrealized loss positions. ~~Impairment of these securities was primarily attributable to increases in market interest rates subsequent to the date of acquisition.~~ The timely payment of principal and interest on these securities is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. Government. ~~Given~~As such, there is an assumption of zero credit loss and the ~~expectation of timely payment of principal and interest~~Company expects to recover the ~~impairments were considered to be temporary.~~

~~Private label residentialMBSandCMOs~~

At March 31, 2019, twenty-six private label residential MBS and CMOs were in unrealized loss positions, primarily as a result of an increase in medium and long-term market interest rates subsequent to acquisition. These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit and prepayment behavioral models that incorporate CUSIP level constant default rates, voluntary prepayment rates and loss severity and delinquency assumptions. The resultsentire amortized cost basis of these ~~assessments were not indicative~~securities.

Table of ~~credit losses related to any of these securities as of March 31, 2019. Given the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal the impairments were considered to be temporary.~~

~~Private label commercial~~Contents~~MBS~~

At March 31, 2019, twenty-three private label commercial MBS were in unrealized loss positions, primarily as a result of an increase in market interest rates since acquisition. These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit and prepayment behavioral models incorporating assumptions consistent with the collateral characteristics of each security. The results of this

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Private Label Securities:

None of the impaired securities had missed principal or interest payments or had been downgraded by a NRSRO at March 31, 2020. The Company performed an analysis ~~were not indicative~~comparing the present value of cash flows expected ~~credit losses. Given the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal the impairments were considered~~ to be ~~temporary.~~collected to the amortized cost basis of impaired securities. This analysis was based on a scenario that we believe to be generally more severe than our reasonable and supportable economic forecast at March 31, 2020, and incorporated assumptions about voluntary prepayment rates, collateral defaults, delinquencies, severity and other relevant factors as described further below. Our analysis also considered the structural characteristics of each security and the level of credit enhancement provided by that structure. Based on the results of this analysis, the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of its impaired AFS securities at March 31, 2020. No ACL was considered necessary at March 31, 2020.

Private label residential MBS and CMOs

At March 31, 2020, 40 private label residential MBS and CMOs were in unrealized loss positions. Our analysis of cash flows expected to be collected on these securities incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, voluntary prepayment rates, loss severity, delinquencies and recovery lag. In developing those assumptions, we took into account collateral quality measures such as FICO, LTV, documentation, loan type, property type, agency availability criteria and performing status. We also regularly monitor sector data including home price appreciation, forbearance, delinquency and prepay trends as well as other economic data which would indicate further stress in the sector. Our March 31, 2020 analysis projected weighted average collateral losses for this category of 5% compared to weighted average credit support of 21%. 90% of impaired securities in this category were externally rated AAA, 6% were rated AA and one security representing 4% of the category was not externally rated; this security was internally rated investment grade.

Private label commercial MBS

At March 31, 2020, NaN private label commercial MBS were in unrealized loss positions Our analysis of cash flows expected to be collected on these securities incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, voluntary prepayment rates, loss severity, delinquencies and recovery lag. In developing those assumptions, we took into account collateral quality and type, loan size, loan purpose and other qualitative factors. We also regularly monitor collateral watchlisted, bankruptcy data, special servicing trends, delinquency and other economic data which would indicate further stress in the sector. Our March 31, 2020 analysis projected weighted average collateral losses for this category of 13% compared to weighted average credit support of 42%. 82% of impaired securities in this category were externally rated AAA, 12% were rated AA and 6% were rated A.

Single family rental real estate-backed securities

At March 31, ~~2019, ten~~2020, NaN single family rental real estate-backed securities were in unrealized loss positions. ~~The unrealized losses were primarily due to increases in market interest rates since the purchase of the securities. Management's~~Our analysis of the credit characteristics, including loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios, and levels of subordination for each of the securities is not indicative of projected credit losses. Given the absence of projected credit losses the impairments were consideredcash flows expected to be ~~temporary.~~collected on these securities incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, loss severity, delinquencies and recovery lag. We regularly monitor sector data including home price appreciation, forbearance, delinquency and prepay trends as well as other economic data which would indicate further stress in the sector. Our March 31, 2020 analysis projected weighted average collateral losses for this category of 12% compared to weighted average credit support of 51%. 91% of impaired securities in this category were externally rated AAA and 9% were rated AA.

Collateralized loan ~~obligations:~~obligations

At March 31, ~~2019, twenty-one~~2020, NaN collateralized loan obligations were in unrealized loss ~~positions, primarily due~~positions. Leveraged loans underlying these securities have seen pricing pressure as the market looks to ~~widening credit spreads for this asset class. These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit~~evaluate ability of borrowers to maintain payments. Uncertainties surrounding the broad economy and ~~prepayment behavioral models incorporating assumptions consistent with~~how they may translate into rating downgrades and defaults as the ~~collateral characteristics~~COVID-19 crisis plays out have negatively impacted pricing in the leveraged loan market. Our analysis of ~~each security. The results of this analysis were not indicative of~~cash flows expected ~~credit losses. Given the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal, the impairments were considered~~ to be ~~temporary.~~

~~Non-mortgage asset-backed securities~~

At March 31, 2019, four non-mortgage asset-backed securities were in unrealized loss positions, due primarily to increases in market interest rates subsequent to the date of acquisition. These securities were assessed for OTTI using credit and prepayment behavioral models incorporating assumptions consistent with the collateral characteristics of each security. The results of this analysis were not indicative of expected credit losses. Given the expectation of timely recovery of outstanding principal, the impairments were considered to be temporary.

~~State and municipal obligations~~

At March 31, 2019, two state and municipal obligations were in unrealized loss positions. The impairments are primarily attributable to increases in market interest rates since acquisition and changes in statutory tax rates. Both of the securities are rated investment grade by nationally recognized statistical ratings organizations. Management's evaluation of these securities for OTTI also encompassed the review of credit scores and analysis provided by a third party firm specializing in the analysis and credit review of municipal securities. Given the absence of expected credit losses, the impairments were considered to be temporary.

~~SBA Securities~~

At March 31, 2019, eight SBA securities were in unrealized loss positions. These securities were purchased at a premium and the impairment was attributable primarily to increased prepayment speeds. The timely payment of principal and interestcollected on these securities ~~is guaranteed by~~incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, loss severity, and delinquencies, calibrated to take into account idiosyncratic risks associated with the underlying collateral. In developing those assumptions, we took into account each sector’s performance pre, during and post the 2008 financial crisis. We regularly engage with bond managers to monitor trends in underlying collateral including potential downgrades and subsequent cash flow diversions, liquidity, ratings migration, and any other relevant developments. Our March 31, 2020 analysis projected weighted average collateral losses for this ~~U.S. Government agency. Given the expectation~~category of ~~timely payment~~21% compared to weighted average credit support of ~~principal~~41%. 84% of impaired securities in this category were externally rated AAA, 13% were rated AA and ~~interest, the impairments~~3% were ~~considered to be temporary.~~rated A.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Non-mortgage asset-backed securities

At March 31, 2020, 10 non-mortgage asset-backed securities were in unrealized loss positions. These securities are backed by student loan collateral. Our analysis of cash flows expected to be collected on these securities incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, loss severity, delinquencies, voluntary prepayment rates and recovery lag. In developing those assumptions, we took into account collateral type, delineated by whether collateral consisted of loans to borrowers in school, refinancing, or a mixture. Our March 31, 2020 analysis projected weighted average collateral losses for this category of 8% compared to weighted average credit support of 18%. 94% of impaired securities in this category were externally rated AAA and 6% were rated AA.

Note 4 Loans and Allowance for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses

Loans consisted of the following at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2019					December 31, 2018					March 31, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	4,657,344		20.9	%	$	4,606,828		21.0	%	$	4,843,908		20.9	%	$	4,953,936		21.4	%
Government insured residential	312,312			1.4	%	265,701			1.2	%	782,060			3.4	%	698,644			3.0	%
Other	14,341			0.1	%	17,369			0.1	%
Other consumer loans											8,855			0.1	%	8,539			0.1	%
	4,983,997			22.4	%	4,889,898			22.3	%	5,634,823			24.4	%	5,661,119			24.5	%
Commercial:
Multi-family	2,534,527			11.4	%	2,583,331			11.8	%	1,967,578			8.5	%	2,217,705			9.6	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,817,629			21.5	%	4,700,188			21.4	%	4,987,798			21.5	%	5,030,904			21.7	%
Construction and land	213,634			1.0	%	227,134			1.0	%	222,223			1.0	%	243,925			1.1	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	2,093,373			9.4	%	2,122,381			9.7	%	2,026,510			8.7	%	2,062,808			8.9	%
Commercial and industrial	5,039,938			22.5	%	4,801,226			21.9	%	5,008,573			21.6	%	4,655,349			20.1	%
Commercial lending subsidiaries	2,629,874			11.8	%	2,608,834			11.9	%
Pinnacle											1,187,607			5.0	%	1,202,430			5.2	%
Bridge - franchise finance											647,699			2.8	%	627,482			2.6	%
Bridge - equipment finance											649,154			2.8	%	684,794			3.0	%
Mortgage warehouse lending											852,313			3.7	%	768,472			3.3	%
	17,328,975			77.6	%	17,043,094			77.7	%	17,549,455			75.6	%	17,493,869			75.5	%
Total loans	22,312,972			100.0	%	21,932,992			100.0	%	23,184,278			100.0	%	23,154,988			100.0	%
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, net	45,845					44,016
Loans including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs	22,358,817					21,977,008
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(114,703		)			(109,931		)
Allowance for credit losses											(250,579		)			(108,671		)
Loans, net	$	22,244,114				$	21,867,077				$	22,933,699				$	23,046,317

~~Through two subsidiaries,~~Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, excluding the ~~Bank provides commercial~~non-credit related discount on PCD loans, totaled $47 million and ~~municipal equipment and franchise financing utilizing both loan and lease structures. At~~$50 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018, the commercial lending subsidiaries portfolio included a net investment in leases~~2019, respectively. The amortized cost basis of ~~$743~~residential PCD loans was $140 million and ~~$739~~the related amount of non-credit discount was $143 million at March 31, 2020. The ACL related to PCD residential loans was $1.6 million and $1.7 million at March 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020, the date of initial adoption of ASU 2016-13, respectively.

Included in the table above are direct or sales type finance leases totaling $717 million and $733 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The amount of income recognized from direct or sales type finance leases for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $5.5 million and $5.3 million, respectively and is recorded as interest income on loans in the consolidated statements of income.

During the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company purchased 1-4 single family residential loans totaling ~~$305~~$503 million and ~~$333~~$305 million, respectively. Purchases for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ included ~~$133~~$286 million and ~~$39~~$133 million, respectively, of government insured residential loans.

~~At March 31, 2019, the Company had pledged real estate loans with UPB~~

Table of ~~approximately $10.0 billion and recorded investment of approximately $9.9 billion as security for FHLB advances.~~

~~The following presents the Company's recorded investment in ACI loans, included in the table above, as of the dates indicated (in thousands):~~

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Residential $ 185,886
$ 190,223
Commercial 17,781
17,925
$ 203,667
$ 208,148

Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

At March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the ~~UPB~~Company had pledged loans with a carrying value of ~~ACI~~approximately $10.5 billion and $10.2 billion, respectively, as security for FHLB advances and Federal Reserve discount window borrowings.

At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, accrued interest receivable on loans totaled $88 million and $83 million, respectively, and is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The amount of interest income reversed on non-accrual loans was ~~$390 million and $408 million, respectively. The accretable yield on ACI loans represents~~not material for the ~~amount by which undiscounted expected future cash flows exceed recorded investment. Changes~~three months ended March 31, 2020.

Allowance for credit losses

Activity in the ~~accretable yield on ACI loans~~allowance for credit losses is summarized below. The balance at December 31, 2019 and amounts presented for the three months ended March 31, 2019 represent the allowance for loan and leases losses, estimated using an incurred loss methodology. The ACL at March 31, 2020 and activity for the ~~year~~three months then ended ~~December 31, 2018~~ were ~~as follows~~determined using the CECL methodology (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 455,059
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference, net 128,499
Accretion (369,915 )
Other changes, net ⁽¹⁾
78,204
Balance at December 31, 2018 291,847
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference, net 3,440
Accretion (16,415 )
Balance at March 31, 2019 $ 278,872


~~(1)~~	~~Represents changes in cash flows expected to be collected due to the impact of changes in prepayment assumptions.~~

~~Allowance for loan and lease losses~~

~~Activity in the ALLL is summarized as follows for the periods indicated (thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total
Beginning balance $ 10,788
$ 99,143
$ 109,931
$ 10,720
$ 134,075
$ 144,795
Provision 150
10,131
10,281
374
2,773
3,147
Charge-offs —
(6,133 ) (6,133 ) (282 ) (10,350 ) (10,632 )
Recoveries 14
610
624
20
146
166
Ending balance $ 10,952
$ 103,751
$ 114,703
$ 10,832
$ 126,644
$ 137,476



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020									2019
	Residential and Other Consumer			Commercial			Total			Residential and Other Consumer		Commercial			Total
Beginning balance, December 31	$	11,154		$	97,517		$	108,671		$	10,788	$	99,143		$	109,931
Impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13	8,098			19,207			27,305			—		—			—
Provision (recovery)	(6,648		)	128,513			121,865			150		10,131			10,281
Charge-offs	(31		)	(7,775		)	(7,806		)	—		(6,133		)	(6,133		)
Recoveries	3			541			544			14		610			624
Ending balance, March 31	$	12,576		$	238,003		$	250,579		$	10,952	$	103,751		$	114,703

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

The following table presents ~~information about~~ the ~~balance~~components of the ~~ALLL and related loans at the dates indicated (in thousands):~~

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total Residential and Other Consumer Commercial Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:

Ending balance $ 10,952
$ 103,751
$ 114,703
$ 10,788
$ 99,143
$ 109,931
Ending balance: loans individually evaluated for impairment $ 9
$ 13,667
$ 13,676
$ 134
$ 12,143
$ 12,277
Ending balance: loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 10,943
$ 90,084
$ 101,027
$ 10,654
$ 87,000
$ 97,654
Ending balance: ACI loans $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
Loans: 0

Ending balance $ 5,045,687
$ 17,313,130
$ 22,358,817
$ 4,948,989
$ 17,028,019
$ 21,977,008
Ending balance: loans individually evaluated for impairment $ 10,891
$ 122,442
$ 133,333
$ 7,690
$ 108,841
$ 116,531
Ending balance: loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 4,848,910
$ 17,172,907
$ 22,021,817
$ 4,751,076
$ 16,901,253
$ 21,652,329
Ending balance: ACI loans $ 185,886
$ 17,781
$ 203,667
$ 190,223
$ 17,925
$ 208,148

~~Credit quality information~~

Loans, other than ACI loans and government insured residential loans, are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements. Commercial relationships with committed balances greater than or equal to $1.0 million that have internal risk ratings of substandard or doubtful and are on non-accrual status, as well as loans that have been modified in TDRs, are individually evaluatedprovision for impairment. Other commercial relationships on non-accrual status with committed balances under $1.0 million may also be evaluated individually for impairment at management's discretion. The likelihood of loss related to loans assigned internal risk ratings of substandard or doubtful is considered elevated due to their identified credit weaknesses. Factors considered by management in evaluating impairment include payment status, financial condition of the borrower, collateral value, and other factors impacting the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.

An ACI pool or loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all the cash flows expected at acquisition, plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. 1-4 single family residential and home equity ACI loans accounted for in pools are evaluated collectively for impairment on a pool by pool basis based on expected pool cash flows. Commercial ACI loans are individually evaluated for impairment based on expected cash flows from the individual loans. Discount continues to be accreted on ACI loans or pools as long as there are expected future cash flows in excess of the current carrying amount of the loans or pools.

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

~~The table below presents information about loans identified as impaired at the dates indicated (in thousands):~~

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018

Recorded
Investment
UPB
Related
Specific
Allowance

Recorded
Investment
UPB
Related
Specific
Allowance
With no specific allowance recorded:

1-4 single family residential ⁽¹⁾
$ 10,338
$ 10,193
$ —
$ 5,724
$ 5,605
$ —
Multi-family 25,298
25,329
—
25,560
25,592
—
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 10,685
10,594
—
12,293
12,209
—
Construction and land 8,694
8,697
—
9,923
9,925
—
Owner occupied commercial real estate 10,691
10,729
—
9,007
9,024
—
Commercial and industrial
11,740
11,750
—
13,514
13,519
—
Commercial lending subsidiaries 2,744
2,757
—
3,152
3,149
—
With a specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential ⁽¹⁾
553
541
9
1,966
1,941
134
Owner occupied commercial real estate —
—
—
3,316
3,322
844
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 12,411
12,399
2,165
1,666
1,667
731
Construction and land 1,096
1,096
110
—
—
—
Commercial and industrial 20,685
20,660
5,083
10,939
10,946
3,831
Commercial lending subsidiaries 18,398
18,311
6,309
19,471
19,385
6,737
Total:
Residential and other consumer $ 10,891
$ 10,734
$ 9
$ 7,690
$ 7,546
$ 134
Commercial 122,442
122,322
13,667
108,841
108,738
12,143
$ 133,333
$ 133,056
$ 13,676
$ 116,531
$ 116,284
$ 12,277


~~(1)~~	~~Includes government insured residential loans modified in TDRs totaling $6.1 million and $3.5 million at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~

~~Interest income recognized on impaired loans was immaterial~~losses for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 and 2018.~~

~~The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans for the periods indicated~~2020 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Residential and other consumer:

1-4 single family residential $ 9,291
$ 4,596
Commercial:
Multi-family 25,429
24,720
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 18,528
12,876
Construction and land 9,857
3,148
Owner occupied commercial real estate 11,507
21,599
Commercial and industrial 28,439
110,312
Commercial lending subsidiaries 21,883
2,126
115,643
174,781
$ 124,934
$ 179,377



Amount related to funded portion of loans	$	121,865
Amount related to off-balance sheet credit exposures	3,563
Provision for credit losses	$	125,428

Credit quality information

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

The increase in the ACL from January 1, 2020, the date of initial adoption of ASU 2016-13, to March 31, ~~2019~~

2020 included approximately $93 million related to the change in the Company's reasonable and supportable economic forecast, in large part resulting from the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. The ~~following table presents~~increase also reflected an increase in specific reserves of approximately $16 million, the ~~recorded investment~~majority of which related to the Bridge franchise finance portfolio. The credit quality of the loan portfolio has been and is likely to continue to be impacted by the developing COVID-19 crisis, its impact on the economy broadly and more specifically on the Company's individual borrowers. Significant uncertainty currently exists about the extent of this impact, and the impact is likely not fully reflected in ~~loans on non-accrual status~~the credit quality indicators disclosed below as of ~~the dates indicated (in thousands):~~

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Residential and other consumer:

1-4 single family residential $ 7,355
$ 6,316
Other consumer loans 283
288
7,638
6,604
Commercial:
Multi-family 25,298
25,560
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 25,459
16,050
Construction and land 9,790
9,923
Owner occupied commercial real estate 18,439
19,789
Commercial and industrial
24,346
28,584
Commercial lending subsidiaries 22,224
22,733
125,556
122,639
$ 133,194
$ 129,243

~~Loans contractually delinquent by 90 days or more and still accruing totaled $0.7 million at December 31, 2018. There were no loans contractually delinquent by 90 days and still accruing at~~ March 31, ~~2019.~~2020, due to the recent emergence of the pandemic.

Credit quality of loans held for investment is continuously monitored by dedicated residential credit risk management and commercial portfolio management functions. The ~~amount~~Company also has a workout and recovery department that monitors the credit quality of ~~additional interest income that would have been recognized on non-accrual~~criticized and classified loans ~~had they performed in accordance with their contractual terms was approximately $2.0 million~~ and ~~$1.4 million~~an independent internal credit review function.

Credit quality indicators for ~~the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.~~residential loans

Management considers delinquency status to be the most meaningful indicator of the credit quality of ~~1-4 single family~~ residential ~~home equity~~ and other consumer loans, other than government insured residential loans. Delinquency statistics are updated at least monthly. ~~See "Aging of loans" below for more information on the delinquency status of loans. Original~~ LTV and ~~original~~ FICO ~~score~~scores are also important indicators of credit quality for 1-4 single family residential loans other than ~~the FSB loans and~~ government insured loans. FICO scores are generally updated at least annually, and were most recently updated in the fourth quarter of 2019. LTVs

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

are typically at origination since we do not routinely update residential appraisals. Substantially all of the government insured residential loans are government insured buyout loans, which the Company buys out of GNMA securitizations upon default. For these loans, traditional measures of credit quality are not particularly relevant considering the guaranteed nature of the loans and the underlying business model. Factors that impact risk inherent in the residential portfolio segment include national and regional economic conditions such as levels of unemployment and wages, as well as residential property values.

1-4 Single Family Residential credit exposure, excluding government insured residential loans, based on delinquency status:



	March 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost By Origination Year
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior		Total
Current	$	87,016	$	879,031	$	558,853	$	771,877	752,364		$	1,735,010	$	4,784,151
30 - 59 Days Past Due	—		17,524		4,282		3,974		3,357		17,003		46,140
60 - 89 Days Past Due	—		—		—		—		—		1,986		1,986
90 Days or More Past Due	—		807		1,853		177		485		8,309		11,631
	$	87,016	$	897,362	$	564,988	$	776,028	$	756,206	$	1,762,308	$	4,843,908



	December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost By Origination Year
	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015		Prior		Total
Current	$	804,913	$	609,814	$	830,710	$	783,318	$	633,833	$	1,225,030	$	4,887,618
30 - 59 Days Past Due	13,915		3,003		3,751		8,419		4,308		12,238		45,634
60 - 89 Days Past Due	1,785		442		137		486		1,766		4,962		9,578
90 Days or More Past Due	—		1,762		914		—		5,030		3,400		11,106
	$	820,613	$	615,021	$	835,512	$	792,223	$	644,937	$	1,245,630	$	4,953,936

1-4 Single Family Residential credit exposure, excluding government insured residential loans, based on LTV:



	March 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost By Origination Year
LTV	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior		Total
Less than 61%	$	27,741	$	192,928	$	127,117	$	176,768	220,664		$	546,673	$	1,291,891
61% - 70%	16,460		211,530		118,704		140,679		179,839		433,278		1,100,490
71% - 80%	42,815		476,643		286,050		379,188		324,805		759,286		2,268,787
More than 80%	—		16,261		33,117		79,393		30,898		23,071		182,740
	$	87,016	$	897,362	$	564,988	$	776,028	$	756,206	$	1,762,308	$	4,843,908

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020



	December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost By Origination Year
LTV	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015		Prior		Total
Less than 61%	$	171,069	$	134,978	$	183,807	$	228,868	$	197,039	$	372,221	$	1,287,982
61% - 70 %	195,572		128,766		152,502		188,856		154,307		316,031		1,136,034
71% - 80%	442,311		313,779		404,743		338,000		283,202		531,377		2,313,412
More than 80%	11,661		37,498		94,460		36,499		10,389		26,001		216,508
	$	820,613	$	615,021	$	835,512	$	792,223	$	644,937	$	1,245,630	$	4,953,936

1-4 Single Family Residential credit exposure, excluding government insured residential loans, based on FICO score:



	March 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost By Origination Year
FICO	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior		Total
760 or greater	$	51,040	$	533,109	$	353,758	$	545,124	554,866		$	1,206,334	$	3,244,231
720 - 759	26,441		245,732		125,396		136,295		122,158		318,032		974,054
719 or less	9,535		118,521		85,834		94,609		79,182		237,942		625,623
	$	87,016	$	897,362	$	564,988	$	776,028	$	756,206	$	1,762,308	$	4,843,908



	December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost By Origination Year
FICO	2019		2018		2017		2016		2015		Prior		Total
760 or greater	$	470,057	$	340,716	$	534,017	$	533,804	$	430,706	$	763,807	$	3,073,107
720 - 759	242,806		185,939		200,623		178,139		141,748		307,195		1,256,450
719 or less	107,750		88,366		100,872		80,280		72,483		174,628		624,379
	$	820,613	$	615,021	$	835,512	$	792,223	$	644,937	$	1,245,630	$	4,953,936

Credit quality indicators for commercial loans

Factors that impact risk inherent in commercial portfolio segments include but are not limited to levels of economic activity, health of the national and regional economy, industry trends, patterns of and trends in customer behavior that influence demand for our borrowers' products and services, and commercial real estate values. Internal risk ratings are considered the most meaningful indicator of credit quality for commercial loans. Internal risk ratings are generally indicative of the likelihood that a borrower will default, are a key factor ~~in identifying~~influencing the level and nature of ongoing monitoring of loans ~~that are individually evaluated for impairment~~ and may impact ~~management’s estimates of loss factors used in determining~~ the ~~amount~~estimation of the ~~ALLL.~~ACL. Internal risk ratings are updated on a continuous basis. Generally, relationships with balances in excess of defined thresholds, ranging from $1 million to $3 million, are re-evaluated at least annually and more frequently if circumstances indicate that a change in risk rating may be warranted. Loans exhibiting potential credit weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention and that if left uncorrected may result in deterioration of the repayment capacity of the borrower are categorized as special mention. Loans with well-defined credit weaknesses, including payment defaults, declining collateral values, frequent overdrafts, operating losses, increasing balance sheet leverage, inadequate cash flow, project cost overruns, unreasonable construction delays, past due real estate taxes or exhausted interest reserves, are assigned an internal risk rating of substandard. A loan with a weakness so severe that collection in full is highly questionable or improbable, but because of certain reasonably specific pending factors has not been charged off, will be assigned an internal risk rating of doubtful.

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

~~The following tables summarize key indicators~~

Table of ~~credit quality for the Company's loans at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (in thousands):~~

~~1-4 Single Family Residential credit exposure for loans, excluding FSB loans and government insured residential loans, based on original LTV and FICO score:~~

March 31, 2019
FICO
LTV 720 or less 721 - 740 741 - 760 761 or
greater Total
60% or less $ 105,240
$ 125,817
$ 192,383
$ 799,247
$ 1,222,687
60% - 70% 124,602
109,812
171,155
607,402
1,012,971
70% - 80% 165,318
206,489
381,236
1,288,028
2,041,071
More than 80% 19,016
36,464
43,214
146,150
244,844
$ 414,176
$ 478,582
$ 787,988
$ 2,840,827
$ 4,521,573

December 31, 2018
FICO
LTV 720 or less 721 - 740 741 - 760 761 or
greater Total
60% or less $ 105,812
$ 123,877
$ 197,492
$ 813,944
$ 1,241,125
60% - 70% 120,982
109,207
170,531
597,659
998,379
70% - 80% 156,519
203,121
374,311
1,264,491
1,998,442
More than 80% 17,352
35,036
36,723
136,487
225,598
$ 400,665
$ 471,241
$ 779,057
$ 2,812,581
$ 4,463,544
Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Commercial credit exposure based on internal risk rating:


	March 31, 2019																March 31, 2020
											Commercial Lending Subsidiaries						Amortized Cost By Origination Year												Revolving Loans
	Multi-Family		Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Construction and Land		Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Pinnacle		Bridge		Total		2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior				Total
Multi-Family																													Revolving Loans
Pass	$	2,502,332	$	4,734,775	$	203,619	$	2,034,437	$	4,944,693	$	1,450,317	$	1,128,649	$	16,998,822	$	31,968	$	326,309	$	207,696	$	256,990	$	354,655	$	705,420	$	38,481		$	1,921,519
Special mention	—		2,565		—		25,233		23,460		—		24,625		75,883		—		—		—		—		4,357		—		—			4,357
Substandard	34,256		69,068		9,790		30,844		57,393		—		27,819		229,170		—		—		—		2,850		6,240		32,612		—			41,702
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		2,950		—		6,305		9,255
Total Multi-Family																	$	31,968	$	326,309	$	207,696	$	259,840	$	365,252	$	738,032	$	38,481		$	1,967,578
	$	2,536,588	$	4,806,408	$	213,409	$	2,090,514	$	5,028,496	$	1,450,317	$	1,187,398	$	17,313,130
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate
Pass																	$	184,902	$	1,304,343	$	848,343	$	552,954	$	848,587	$	1,077,415	$	84,238		$	4,900,782
Special mention																	—		—		—		4,201		114		—		—			4,315
Substandard																	—		11,202		222		462		22,082		48,733		—			82,701
Total non-owner occupied commercial real estate																	$	184,902	$	1,315,545	$	848,565	$	557,617	$	870,783	$	1,126,148	$	84,238		$	4,987,798

Construction and Land
Pass																	$	6,283	$	94,863	$	18,643	$	63,292	$	27,579	$	2,121	$	831		$	213,612
Special mention																	—		—		—		—		4,284		—		—			4,284
Substandard																	—		—		888		—		3,093		346		—			4,327
Total Construction and Land																	$	6,283	$	94,863	$	19,531	$	63,292	$	34,956	$	2,467	$	831		$	222,223

Owner occupied commercial real estate
Pass																	$	36,757	$	340,526	$	305,021	$	324,384	$	341,658	$	571,570	$	29,758		$	1,949,674
Special mention																	—		—		—		4,582		15,519		6,069		—			26,170
Substandard																	—		3,203		12,608		11,915		2,779		10,610		9,551			50,666
Total owner occupied commercial real estate																	$	36,757	$	343,729	$	317,629	$	340,881	$	359,956	$	588,249	$	39,309		$	2,026,510

Commercial and industrial
Pass																	$	105,617	$	1,180,796	$	447,385	$	289,605	$	237,327	$	75,858	$	2,466,871		$	4,803,459
Special mention																	—		2,306		1,002		1,005		426		665		61,769			67,173
Substandard																	—		10,519		18,642		25,863		23,776		43,748		15,393			137,941
Total commercial and industrial																	$	105,617	$	1,193,621	$	467,029	$	316,473	$	261,529	$	120,271	$	2,544,033		$	5,008,573

Pinnacle
Pass																	$	14,982	$	140,375	$	99,903	$	241,039	$	234,526	$	456,782	$	—		$	1,187,607
Total Pinnacle																	$	14,982	$	140,375	$	99,903	$	241,039	$	234,526	$	456,782	$	—		$	1,187,607

Bridge - Franchise Finance
Pass																	$	73,535	$	137,509	$	69,366	$	47,212	$	25,975	$	21,887	$	—		$	375,484
Special mention																	11,004		119,647		35,462		5,597		8,620		719		—			181,049
Substandard																	183		11,419		59,257		6,310		11,658		2,339		—			91,166
Total Bridge - Franchise Finance																	$	84,722	$	268,575	$	164,085	$	59,119	$	46,253	$	24,945	$	—		$	647,699

Bridge - Equipment Finance
Pass																	$	24,544	$	212,004	$	123,552	$	133,612	$	60,226	$	82,855	$	—		$	636,793
Special mention																	—		—		800		—		—		—		—			800
Substandard																	—		—		—		—		7,693		3,868		—			11,561
Total Bridge - Equipment Finance																	$	24,544	$	212,004	$	124,352	$	133,612	$	67,919	$	86,723	$	—		$	649,154

Mortgage Warehouse Lending
Pass																	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	852,313		$	852,313
Total Mortgage Warehouse Lending																	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	852,313		$	852,313

At March 31, 2020, the balance of revolving loans converted to term loans was immaterial.

December 31, 2018
Commercial Lending Subsidiaries
Multi-Family Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate Construction
and Land Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate Commercial and Industrial Pinnacle Bridge Total
Pass $ 2,547,835
$ 4,611,029
$ 216,917
$ 2,077,611
$ 4,706,666
$ 1,462,655
$ 1,105,821
$ 16,728,534
Special mention 2,932
16,516
—
13,368
38,097
—
10,157
81,070
Substandard 34,654
61,335
9,923
28,901
43,691
—
31,522
210,026
Doubtful —
—
—
—
1,746
—
6,643
8,389
$ 2,585,421
$ 4,688,880

$ 226,840
$ 2,119,880

$ 4,790,200
$ 1,462,655
$ 1,154,143

$ 17,028,019

~~Aging~~Table of ~~loans:~~

~~The following table presents an aging of loans at the dates indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (in thousands):~~

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Current
30 - 59
Days Past
Due

60 - 89
Days Past
Due

90 Days or
More Past
Due
Total Current
30 - 59
Days Past
Due

60 - 89
Days Past
Due

90 Days or
More Past
Due
Total
1-4 single family residential $ 4,527,777
$ 175,741
$ 7,983
$ 6,552
$ 4,718,053
$ 4,640,771
$ 15,070
$ 2,126
$ 6,953
$ 4,664,920
Government insured residential 33,354
14,518
17,965
247,474
313,311
31,348
8,342
8,871
218,168
266,729
Home equity loans and lines of credit 1,405
—
—
—
1,405
1,393
—
—
—
1,393
Other consumer loans 10,913
—
2,005
—
12,918
15,947
—
—
—
15,947
Multi-family 2,536,588
—
—
—
2,536,588
2,585,421
—
—
—
2,585,421
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 4,784,011
7,819
12,411
2,167
4,806,408
4,682,443
3,621
1,374
1,442
4,688,880
Construction and land 209,374
2,939
—
1,096
213,409
224,828
916
—
1,096
226,840
Owner occupied commercial real estate 2,078,379
2,834
1,881
7,420
2,090,514
2,106,104
2,826
1,087
9,863
2,119,880
Commercial and industrial 5,017,066
864
208
10,358
5,028,496
4,772,978
6,732
926
9,564
4,790,200
Commercial lending subsidiaries
Pinnacle 1,450,317
—
—
—
1,450,317
1,462,655
—
—
—
1,462,655
Bridge 1,183,944
3,384
—
70
1,187,398
1,152,312
603
—
1,228
1,154,143
$ 21,833,128
$ 208,099
$ 42,453
$ 275,137
$ 22,358,817
$ 21,676,200
$ 38,110
$ 14,384
$ 248,314
$ 21,977,008

Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

The following tables summarizes the Company's commercial credit exposure based on internal risk rating, in aggregate, at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020
	Multi-Family		Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Construction and Land		Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Pinnacle		Bridge - Franchise Finance		Bridge - Equipment Finance		Mortgage Warehouse Lending		Total
Pass	$	1,921,519	$	4,900,782	$	213,612	$	1,949,674	$	4,803,459	$	1,187,607	$	375,484	$	636,793	$	852,313	$	16,841,243
Special mention	4,357		4,315		4,284		26,170		67,173		—		181,049		800		—		288,148
Substandard	41,702		82,701		4,327		50,666		137,941		—		91,166		11,561		—		420,064
	$	1,967,578	$	4,987,798	$	222,223	$	2,026,510	$	5,008,573	$	1,187,607	$	647,699	$	649,154	$	852,313	$	17,549,455



	December 31, 2019
	Multi-Family		Non-Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Construction and Land		Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Pinnacle		Bridge - Franchise Finance		Bridge - Equipment Finance		Mortgage Warehouse Lending		Total
Pass	$	2,184,771	$	4,932,279	$	240,734	$	1,991,556	$	4,508,563	$	1,202,430	$	562,042	$	663,855	$	768,472	$	17,054,702
Special mention	—		5,831		—		27,870		28,498		—		10,682		—		—		72,881
Substandard	32,934		92,794		3,191		43,382		118,288		—		54,758		20,939		—		366,286
	$	2,217,705	$	5,030,904	$	243,925	$	2,062,808	$	4,655,349	$	1,202,430	$	627,482	$	684,794	$	768,472	$	17,493,869

Past Due and Non-Accrual Loans:

The following table presents an aging of loans at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020										December 31, 2019
	Current		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total		Current		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total
1-4 single family residential	$	4,784,151	$	46,140	$	1,986	$	11,631	$	4,843,908	$	4,887,618	$	45,634	$	9,578	$	11,106	$	4,953,936
Government insured residential	57,363		55,364		46,161		623,172		782,060		93,560		45,347		30,426		529,311		698,644
Home equity loans and lines of credit	1,439		89		—		—		1,528		1,320		—		—		—		1,320
Other consumer loans	5,412		1,915		—		—		7,327		7,219		—		—		—		7,219
Multi-family	1,952,228		15,350		—		—		1,967,578		2,217,705		—		—		—		2,217,705
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,972,128		796		904		13,970		4,987,798		5,015,458		—		928		14,518		5,030,904
Construction and land	220,094		2,129		—		—		222,223		240,647		2,396		—		882		243,925
Owner occupied commercial real estate	1,999,110		4,135		4,619		18,646		2,026,510		2,041,352		1,336		4,420		15,700		2,062,808
Commercial and industrial	4,910,789		43,070		5,206		49,508		5,008,573		4,595,847		2,313		4,301		52,888		4,655,349
Pinnacle	1,187,607		—		—		—		1,187,607		1,202,430		—		—		—		1,202,430
Bridge - franchise finance	610,060		2,394		292		34,953		647,699		610,315		3,840		2,501		10,826		627,482
Bridge - equipment finance	636,418		12,736		—		—		649,154		677,089		7,705		—		—		684,794
Mortgage warehouse lending	852,313		—		—		—		852,313		768,472		—		—		—		768,472
	$	22,189,112	$	184,118	$	59,168	$	751,880	$	23,184,278	$	22,359,032	$	108,571	$	52,154	$	635,231	$	23,154,988

Included in the table above is the guaranteed portion of SBA loans past due by 90 days or more totaling $36.2 million and $36.3 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

Loans contractually delinquent by 90 days or more and still accruing totaled $623 million, all of which were government insured residential loans at March 31, 2020 and $531 million, of which $529 million were government insured residential loans at December 31, 2019. Substantially all of these loans are government insured pool buyout loans, which the Company buys out of GNMA securitizations upon default.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

The following table presents information about loans on non-accrual status at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Amortized Cost With No Related Allowance		Amortized Cost
Residential and other consumer	$	16,956	$	2,691	$	18,894
Commercial:
Multi-family	6,011		6,011		6,138
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	36,355		31,607		40,097
Construction and land	3,439		346		3,191
Owner occupied commercial real estate	26,147		17,766		27,141
Commercial and industrial	60,118		16,095		74,757
Bridge - franchise finance	37,635		2,128		13,631
Bridge - equipment finance	11,561		11,318		20,939
	$	198,222	$	87,962	$	204,788

Included in the table above is the guaranteed portion of non-accrual SBA loans totaling $49.1 million and $45.7 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The amount of additional interest income that would have been recognized on non-accrual loans had they performed in accordance with their contractual terms was approximately $3.0 million and $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Collateral dependent loans:

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans at March 31, 2020 (in thousands):



	Amortized Cost		Extent to Which Secured by Collateral
Residential and other consumer	$	3,356	$	3,343
Commercial:
Multi-family	6,011		6,011
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	20,405		20,405
Construction and land	3,439		3,411
Owner occupied commercial real estate	19,597		19,521
Commercial and industrial	47,278		33,078
Bridge - franchise finance	41,388		28,765
Bridge - equipment finance	11,570		11,559
Total commercial	149,688		122,737
	$	153,044	$	126,080

Collateral for the multi-family, non-owner occupied commercial real estate, and owner-occupied commercial real estate loan classes generally consists of commercial real estate. Collateral for construction and land loans is typically residential or commercial real estate. Collateral for commercial and industrial loans generally consists of equipment, accounts receivable, inventory and other business assets; owner-occupied commercial real estate loans may also be collateralized by these types of assets. Bridge franchise finance loans may be collateralized by franchise value or by equipment. Bridge equipment finance loans are secured by the financed equipment. Residential loans are collateralized by residential real estate.

Foreclosure of residential real estate

The recorded investment in residential loans in the process of foreclosure was $477 million, of which $467 million was government insured, at March 31, 2020 and $257 million, of which $248 million was government insured, at December 31,

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

2019. The carrying amount of foreclosed residential real estate included in "Other assets" in the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheets totaled $6 million at both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The recorded investment in non-government insured residential mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure~~sheet was insignificant at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and $6 million at December 31, ~~2018. The recorded investment in government insured~~2019. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, new foreclosure actions on residential loans ~~in the process of foreclosure totaled $125 million and $85 million at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~have been temporarily suspended.

Troubled debt restructurings

The following table summarizes loans that were modified in TDRs during the periods indicated, as well as loans modified during the twelve months preceding March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 that experienced payment defaults during the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020						2019
	Loans Modified in TDRs During the Period			TDRs Experiencing Payment Defaults During the Period			Loans Modified in TDRs During the Period			TDRs Experiencing Payment Defaults During the Period
	Number of TDRs	Amortized Cost		Number of TDRs	Amortized Cost		Number of TDRs	Amortized Cost		Number of TDRs	Amortized Cost
1-4 single family residential	1	$	200	—	$	—	2	$	567	—	$	—
Government insured residential	90	14,855		25	3,628		20	2,981		16	1,942
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	1	4,249		—	—		—	—		1	2,874
Owner occupied commercial real estate	—	—		—	—		1	904		3	1,962
Commercial and industrial	—	—		—	—		3	12,720		1	143
Bridge - franchise finance	11	13,872		10	12,321		2	1,212		—	—
Bridge - equipment finance	—	—		—	—		1	885		—	—
	103	$	33,176	35	$	15,949	29	$	19,269	21	$	6,921

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Loans Modified in TDRs
During the Period TDRs Experiencing Payment
Defaults During the Period Loans Modified in TDRs
During the Period TDRs Experiencing Payment
Defaults During the Period
Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment Number of
TDRs Recorded
Investment
1-4 single family residential⁽¹⁾
22
$ 3,548
16
$ 1,942
7
$ 2,456
2
$ 185
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate —
—
1
2,874
—
—
—
—
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1
904
3
1,962
—
—
—
—
Commercial and industrial 3
12,720
1
143
5
1,204
11
3,610
Commercial lending subsidiaries 3
2,097
—
—
—
—
—
—
29
$ 19,269
21
$ 6,921
12
$ 3,660
13
$ 3,795


~~(1)~~	~~Includes government insured residential loans modified totaling $3 million and $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.~~

Modifications during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 included interest rate reductions, restructuring of the amount and timing of required periodic payments, extensions of maturity and covenant waivers. Included in TDRs are residential loans to borrowers who have not reaffirmed their debt discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The total amount of such loans is not material. ~~Modified ACI loans accounted for in pools are~~

Under recently issued inter-agency and authoritative guidance and consistent with the CARES Act, short-term (generally periods of six months or less) deferrals or modifications related to COVID-19 will typically not ~~considered TDRs, are not separated from the pools and are not classified~~be categorized as ~~impaired loans.~~TDRs.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

~~Note 5 FDIC Indemnification Asset~~

~~The following tables summarize the components~~Disclosures Prescribed by Legacy GAAP (Before Adoption of the gains and losses associated with covered assets, along with the related additions to or reductions in the amounts recoverable from the FDIC under the Loss Sharing Agreements, as reflected in the consolidated statements of incomeASU 2016-13) for ~~the periods indicated (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Transaction
Income (Loss) Net Loss on FDIC
Indemnification Net Impact
on Pre-tax
Earnings
Provision for losses on covered loans $ (273 ) $ 218
$ (55 )
Income from resolution of covered assets, net 3,317
(2,658 ) 659
Gain on sale of covered loans 1,703
(1,358 ) 345
Loss on covered OREO (293 ) 183
(110 )
$ 4,454
$ (3,615 ) $ 839

The FDIC indemnification asset was amortized to zero as of December 31, 2018 as expectations of losses eligible for indemnification with respect to the remaining covered loans prior to final termination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement were insignificant. The Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement was terminated on February 13, 2019.

~~Note 6 Leases~~

~~Leases under which the Company is the lessee~~

~~The Company leases branches, office space and a small amount of equipment under operating and finance leases with terms ranging from one to 16 years, some of which include extension options.~~Prior Periods

The following table presents ~~ROU assets~~information about the balance of the ALLL and ~~lease liabilities~~related loans as of ~~March~~December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

March 31, 2019
ROU assets:
Operating leases $ 90,908
Finance leases 7,002
$ 97,910
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases $ 99,743
Finance leases 9,145
$ 108,888

~~ROU assets and lease liabilities are included in "other assets" and "other liabilities", respectively, in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.~~



	Residential and Other Consumer		Commercial		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Ending balance	$	11,154	$	97,517	$	108,671
Ending balance: loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	9	$	20,481	$	20,490
Ending balance: loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	11,145	$	77,036	$	88,181
Ending balance: ACI loans	$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans:
Ending balance	$	5,661,119	$	17,493,869	$	23,154,988
Ending balance: loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	57,117	$	187,788	$	244,905
Ending balance: loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	5,454,422	$	17,288,901	$	22,743,323
Ending balance: ACI loans	$	149,580	$	17,180	$	166,760

The ~~weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate at March~~table below presents information about loans identified as impaired as of December 31, 2019 ~~were:~~(in thousands):



~~Weighted average remaining lease term:~~
~~Operating lease~~	~~8.02 years~~
~~Finance lease~~	~~6.52 years~~
~~Weighted average discount rate:~~
~~Operating lease~~	~~3.38~~	%
~~Finance lease~~	~~11.7~~	%



	Recorded Investment		UPB		Related Specific Allowance
With no specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential	$	992	$	989	$	—
Government insured residential	53,428		53,350		—
Multi-family	6,138		6,169		—
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	38,345		38,450		—
Construction and land	3,191		3,155		—
Owner occupied commercial real estate	17,419		17,488		—
Commercial and industrial	10,585		10,574		—
Bridge - franchise finance	4,115		4,117		—
Bridge - equipment finance	6,807		6,793		—
With a specific allowance recorded:
1-4 single family residential	2,697		2,652		9
Owner occupied commercial real estate	2,522		2,509		401
Commercial and industrial	63,531		63,709		13,992
Bridge - franchise finance	21,011		21,050		2,953
Bridge - equipment finance	14,124		14,024		3,135
Total:
Residential and other consumer	$	57,117	$	56,991	$	9
Commercial	187,788		188,038		20,481
	$	244,905	$	245,029	$	20,490

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

~~The components of lease expense for the period indicated were (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Operating lease cost $ 5,034

Finance lease cost:
Amortization of ROU assets $ 350
Interest on lease liabilities 255
Total finance lease cost $ 605

~~Short-term lease cost, variable lease cost, and sublease income were immaterial for the three months ended March 31, 2019.~~

~~Additional information related to operating and finance leases for the period indicated follows (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from finance leases $ 255
Operating cash flows from operating leases 5,143
Financing cash flows from finance leases 735
$ 6,133

Lease liabilities recognized from obtaining ROU assets:
Operating lease liabilities recognized upon adoption of ASC 842 $ 104,064
Finance leases 1,521
$ 105,585

~~Future lease payment obligations under leases with terms in excess of one year and a reconciliation to lease liabilities as of March 31, 2019 follows (in thousands):~~

Operating Leases Finance Leases Total
Years ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the three months ending March 31, 2019) $ 15,503
$ 1,408
$ 16,911
2020 17,211
2,456
19,667
2021 15,472
2,514
17,986
2022 12,221
2,053
14,274
2023 10,422
2,124
12,546
Thereafter 43,549
2,825
46,374
Total future minimum lease payments 114,378
13,380
127,758
Less: interest component (14,635 ) (4,235 ) (18,870 )
Lease liabilities $ 99,743
$ 9,145
$ 108,888

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

~~As of December 31, 2018, future minimum rentals under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year were as follows (in thousands):~~

Years ending December 31:
2019 $ 21,207
2020 17,629
2021 15,858
2022 12,114
2023 10,311
Thereafter through 2034 42,984
$ 120,103

~~Leases under which the Company is the lessor~~

Through its commercial lending subsidiaries, Pinnacle and Bridge, the Bank provides equipment financing using a variety of loan and lease structures. Pinnacle provides essential use equipment financing to state and local governmental entities. Bridge provides primarily transportation equipment financing.

The following table presents the ~~components of the~~average recorded investment in ~~direct or sales type financing leases, included in~~impaired loans infor the ~~Consolidated Balance Sheet, as of March 31, 2019~~period indicated (in thousands):

Total minimum lease payments to be received $ 811,463
Estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased assets 8,263
Gross investment in direct or sales type financing leases 819,726
Unearned income (81,564 )
Initial direct costs 4,897
$ 743,059

~~As of March 31, 2019, future minimum lease payments to be received under direct or sales type financing leases were as follows (in thousands):~~

Years Ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the three months ending March 31, 2019) $ 162,123
2020 176,848
2021 116,382
2022 76,074
2023 60,753
Thereafter 219,283
$ 811,463

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

Equipment under operating lease consists primarily of railcars, non-commercial aircraft and other transportation equipment leased to commercial end users. Original lease terms generally range from three to ten years. Asset risk is evaluated and managed by a dedicated internal staff of seasoned equipment finance professionals with a broad depth and breadth of experience in the leasing business. Additionally, we have partnered with an industry leading, experienced service provider who provides fleet management and servicing relating to the railcar fleet. Residual risk is managed by setting appropriate residual values at inception and systematic reviews of residual values based on independent appraisals, performed at least annually. We endeavor to lease to a stable end-user base, maintain a relatively young and diversified fleet of assets and stagger lease maturities.

~~As of March 31, 2019, scheduled minimum rental payments under operating leases were as follows (in thousands):~~

Years Ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the three months ending March 31, 2019) $ 50,346
2020 61,981
2021 52,537
2022 45,489
2023 37,121
Thereafter through 2033 101,645
$ 349,119

~~Lease income recognized for operating leases and direct or sales type finance leases follows (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Location of Lease Income on Consolidated Statements of Income
Operating leases $ 17,186
Non-interest income from lease financing
Direct or sales type finance leases 5,311
Interest income on loans
Total lease income $ 22,497



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	9,291
Commercial:
Multi-family	25,429
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	18,528
Construction and land	9,857
Owner occupied commercial real estate	11,507
Commercial and industrial	28,439
Commercial lending subsidiaries	21,883
	115,643
	$	124,934

Note 75 Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was ~~26.8%~~23.4% and ~~23.1%~~26.8% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The effective income tax rate differed from the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 due primarily to the impact of state income taxes, partially offset by the benefit of income not subject to federal tax. The Company considered the impact of the COVID-19 situation in its evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax ~~offset by state income taxes.~~assets at March 31, 2020. Due primarily to the forecasted reversal of existing temporary differences and tax loss carryback capacity, the Company concluded that the deferred tax asset was realizable.

Note 86 Derivatives and Hedging Activities

~~The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk related to liabilities that expose the Company to variability in cash flows due to changes in interest rates.~~ The Company enters into LIBOR-based interest rate swaps that are designated as cash flow hedges with the objective of limiting the variability of interest payment cash flows resulting from changes in the benchmark interest rate LIBOR. ~~Changes~~The Company also enters into LIBOR-based interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges designed to hedge changes in the fair value of ~~interest~~outstanding fixed rate ~~swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments are reported in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into interest expense~~borrowings caused by fluctuations in the ~~same period in which the related~~benchmark interest ~~on the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings.~~rate.

The Company ~~also~~ enters into interest rate derivative contracts with certain of its commercial borrowers to enable those borrowers to manage their exposure to interest rate fluctuations. To mitigate interest rate risk associated with these derivative contracts, the Company enters into offsetting derivative contract positions with primary dealers. These interest rate derivative contracts are not designated as hedging instruments; therefore, changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized immediately in earnings. ~~The~~For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the impact on earnings, included in "other non-interest income" in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, related to changes in fair value of these derivatives ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018~~ was not material.

The Company may be exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its interest rate derivative agreements. The Company assesses the credit risk of its financial institution counterparties by monitoring publicly available credit rating and financial information. The Company manages dealer credit risk by entering into interest rate

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

derivatives only with primary and highly rated counterparties, the use of ISDA master agreements, central clearing mechanisms and counterparty limits. The agreements contain bilateral collateral arrangements with the amount of collateral to be posted generally governed by the settlement value of outstanding swaps. The Company manages the risk of default by its commercial borrower counterparties through its normal loan underwriting and credit monitoring policies and procedures. The Company does not currently anticipate any losses from failure of interest rate derivative counterparties to honor their obligations.

The CME legally characterizes variation margin payments for centrally cleared derivatives as settlements of the derivatives' exposures rather than collateral. As a result, the variation margin payment and the related derivative instruments are considered a single unit of account for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The Company's clearing agent for interest rate derivative contracts centrally cleared through the CME settles the variation margin daily with the CME; therefore, those

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

interest rate derivative contracts the Company clears through the CME are reported at a fair value of approximately ~~zero~~0 at both March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The following tables set forth certain information concerning the Company’s interest rate contract derivative financial instruments and related hedged items at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2019																		March 31, 2020
		Weighted Average Pay Rate		Weighted Average Receive Rate		Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years															Weighted Average Pay Rate		Weighted Average Receive Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years
					Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value												Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value
	Hedged Item						Asset				Liability		Hedged Item							Asset					Balance Sheet Location	Liability
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:					Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location														Notional Amount
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps	Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings		2.43%			3-Month Libor	4.1		$	2,701,000		Other assets / Other liabilities		$	1,372			$	—		Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings		2.38%	3-Month LIBOR	2.9		$	3,091,000		Other liabilities		$	—			$	(6,661	)
Derivatives designated as fair value hedges:
Receive-fixed interest rate swaps																			Variability of fair value of fixed rate borrowings		3-Month LIBOR		1.55%	1.3	250,000				Other liabilities	—				—
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps		4.11%		Indexed to 1-month Libor		5.8	1,038,701				Other assets / Other liabilities	8,201				(8,063		)			3.70%		Indexed to 1-month LIBOR	6.2	1,485,199				Other assets / Other liabilities	—				(42,312		)
Pay-variable interest rate swaps		Indexed to 1-month Libor		4.11%		5.8	1,038,701				Other assets / Other liabilities	17,277				(8,685		)			Indexed to 1-month LIBOR		3.70%	6.2	1,485,199				Other assets / Other liabilities	135,720				—
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month Libor				3.44%		0.9	98,129				Other assets	—				—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month Libor		3.44%				0.9	98,129				Other liabilities	—				—
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month LIBOR																							3.71%	1.2	26,023				Other assets	—				—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month LIBOR																					3.71%			1.2	26,023				Other liabilities	—				—
							$	4,974,660				$	26,850			$	(16,748	)							$	6,363,444				$	135,720			$	(48,973	)

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020


	December 31, 2018																		December 31, 2019
		Weighted Average Pay Rate		Weighted Average Receive Rate		Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years															Weighted Average Pay Rate		Weighted Average Receive Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Life in Years
					Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value												Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value
	Hedged Item						Asset				Liability		Hedged Item							Asset					Balance Sheet Location	Liability
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:					Notional Amount			Balance Sheet Location														Notional Amount
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps	Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings		2.38%			3-Month Libor	4.0		$	2,846,000		Other assets / Other liabilities		$	3,405			$	—		Variability of interest cash flows on variable rate borrowings		2.37%	3-Month LIBOR	3.2		$	3,131,000		Other liabilities		$	—			$	(1,607	)
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Receive-fixed interest rate swaps																			Variability of interest cash flows on fixed rate borrowings		3-Month LIBOR		1.55%	1.6	250,000				Other liabilities	—				—
Derivatives not designated as hedges
Pay-fixed interest rate swaps		4.10%		Indexed to 1-month Libor		6.0	1,048,196				Other assets / Other liabilities	14,883				(6,991		)			3.72%		Indexed to 1-month LIBOR	6.4	1,460,355				Other assets / Other liabilities	876				(15,307		)
Pay-variable interest rate swaps		Indexed to 1-month Libor		4.10%		6.0	1,048,196				Other assets / Other liabilities	11,318				(16,874		)			Indexed to 1-month LIBOR		3.72%	6.4	1,460,355				Other assets / Other liabilities	42,810				(2,115		)
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month Libor				3.43%		1.2	98,407				Other assets	9				—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month Libor		3.43%				1.2	98,407				Other liabilities	—				(9		)
Interest rate caps purchased, indexed to 1-month LIBOR																							3.30%	0.6	61,004				Other assets	—				—
Interest rate caps sold, indexed to 1-month LIBOR																					3.30%			0.6	61,004				Other liabilities	—				—
							$	5,139,206				$	29,615			$	(23,874	)							$	6,423,718				$	43,686			$	(19,029	)

The following table provides information about the amount of gain (loss) related to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI into interest expense for the periods indicated ~~(dollars in~~(in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018 Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Interest rate contracts $ 2,723
$ (939 ) Interest expense on borrowings



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019		Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Interest rate contracts	$	(4,556	)	$	2,723	Interest expense on borrowings

During the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, no derivative positions designated as cash flow hedges were discontinued and none of the gains and losses reported in AOCI were reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges or because of the early extinguishment of debt. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the amount of net ~~gain~~loss expected to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the next twelve months was ~~$2.0~~$53.2 million.

The following table provides information about the amount of gain related to derivatives designated as fair value hedges recognized in earnings for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019		Location of Gain (Loss) in Consolidated Statements of Income
Fair value adjustment on derivatives	$	4,020		$	—	Interest expense on borrowings
Fair value adjustment on hedged items	(3,908		)	—		Interest expense on borrowings
Gain recognized on fair value hedges (ineffective portion)	$	112		$	—

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

The following table provides information about the hedged items related to derivatives designated as fair value hedges at the dates indicated (in thousands):



	March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019			Location in Consolidated Balance Sheets
Contractual balance outstanding of hedged item	$	250,000	$	250,000		Federal Home Loan Bank advances
Cumulative fair value hedging adjustments	$	3,409	$	(499	)	Federal Home Loan Bank advances

Some of the Company’s ISDA master agreements with financial institution counterparties contain provisions that permit either counterparty to terminate the agreements and require settlement in the event that regulatory capital ratios fall below certain designated thresholds, upon the initiation of other defined regulatory actions or upon suspension or withdrawal of the Bank’s credit rating. Currently, there are no circumstances that would trigger these provisions of the agreements.

The Company does not offset assets and liabilities under master netting agreements for financial reporting purposes. Information on interest rate swaps subject to these agreements is as follows at the dates indicated ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2019

Gross Amounts Offset in Balance
Sheet
Net Amounts Presented in
Balance Sheet
Gross Amounts Not Offset in
Balance Sheet

Gross Amounts
Recognized

Derivative
Instruments

Collateral
Pledged

Net Amount
Derivative assets $ 9,556
$ —
$ 9,556
$ (5,282 ) $ (3,030 ) $ 1,244
Derivative liabilities (8,063 ) —
(8,063 ) 5,282
2,837
56
$ 1,493
$ —
$ 1,493
$ —
$ (193 ) $ 1,300

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~



	March 31, 2020
				Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts Recognized			Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet		Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Derivative Instruments		Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Derivative assets	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities	(48,973		)	—		(48,973		)	—		48,548		(425		)
	$	(48,973	)	$	—	$	(48,973	)	$	—	$	48,548	$	(425	)


	December 31, 2018																			December 31, 2019
				Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet				Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet													Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet				Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts Recognized						Derivative Instruments				Collateral Pledged		Net Amount			Gross Amounts Recognized						Derivative Instruments					Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Collateral Pledged				Net Amount
Derivative assets	$	18,297		Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet		$	—	Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			$	18,297	$	(5,264	)		$	(13,129	)		$	(96	)	Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet	$	876		$	—			$	876			$	(876	)		$	—	$	—
Derivative liabilities	(6,991		)	—				(6,991		)	5,264		436				(1,291		)	(16,914		)		—			(16,914		)		876				16,038				—
	$	11,306		$	—			$	11,306		$	—	$	(12,693	)		$	(1,387	)	$	(16,038	)		$	—		$	(16,038	)		$	—			$	16,038			$	—

The difference between the amounts reported for interest rate swaps subject to master netting agreements and the total fair value of interest rate contract derivative financial instruments reported in the consolidated balance sheets is related to interest rate derivative contracts ~~entered into with borrowers~~ not subject to master netting agreements.

At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had pledged net financial collateral of ~~$3.7~~$53.2 million as collateral for interest rate swaps in a liability position that are not centrally cleared. ~~Financial collateral of $3.0 million was pledged by counterparties to the Company for interest rate swaps in an asset position.~~ The amount of collateral required to be posted varies based on the settlement value of outstanding swaps and in some cases may include initial margin requirements.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

Note 97 Stockholders’ Equity

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Changes in other comprehensive income are summarized as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,																		Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019									2018									2020									2019
	Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax			Before Tax			Tax Effect			Net of Tax
Unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale:
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	$	29,410		$	(7,794	)	$	21,617		$	(37,176	)	$	9,852		$	(27,324	)	$	(286,636	)	$	73,476		$	(213,160	)	$	29,411		$	(7,794	)	$	21,617
Amounts reclassified to gain on investment securities available for sale, net	(4,317		)	1,144			(3,173		)	(976		)	259			(717		)	(1,530		)	390			(1,140		)	(4,317		)	1,144			(3,173		)
Net change in unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale	25,093			(6,650		)	18,444			(38,152		)	10,111			(28,041		)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale																			(288,166		)	73,866			(214,300		)	25,094			(6,650		)	18,444
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments:
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period	(28,129		)	7,454			(20,675		)	26,929			(7,136		)	19,793
Net unrealized holding loss arising during the period																			(109,951		)	29,137			(80,814		)	(28,129		)	7,454			(20,675		)
Amounts reclassified to interest expense on borrowings	(2,723		)	722			(2,001		)	939			(249		)	690			4,556			(1,207		)	3,349			(2,723		)	722			(2,001		)
Net change in unrealized losses on derivative instruments	(30,852		)	8,176			(22,676		)	27,868			(7,385		)	20,483			(105,395		)	27,930			(77,465		)	(30,852		)	8,176			(22,676		)
Other comprehensive loss	$	(5,759	)	$	1,526		$	(4,232	)	$	(10,284	)	$	2,726		$	(7,558	)	$	(393,561	)	$	101,796		$	(291,765	)	$	(5,758	)	$	1,526		$	(4,232	)

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

The categories of AOCI and changes therein are presented below for the periods indicated (in thousands):


										Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Securities Available for Sale			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2019										$	28,185		(60,012		)	$	(31,827	)
Other comprehensive loss										(214,300		)	(77,465		)	(291,765		)
Balance at March 31, 2020										$	(186,115	)	$	(137,477	)	$	(323,592	)
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Securities Available for Sale			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	4,194		$	679		$	4,873		$	4,194		$	679		$	4,873
Other comprehensive loss	18,444			(22,676		)	(4,232		)	18,444			(22,676		)	(4,232		)
Balance at March 31, 2019	$	22,638		$	(21,997	)	$	641		$	22,638		$	(21,997	)	$	641

Balance at December 31, 2017	$	56,534		$	(1,548	)	$	54,986
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standards	9,187			(285		)	8,902
Other comprehensive loss	(28,041		)	20,483			(7,558		)
Balance at March 31, 2018	$	37,680		$	18,650		$	56,330

~~Other~~

In January 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150 million of its outstanding common stock. Any repurchases will be made in accordance with applicable securities laws from time to time in open market or private transactions. The program may be commenced, suspended or discontinued without prior notice.

Note 108 Equity Based and Other Compensation Plans

Share Awards

Unvested share awards

A summary of activity related to unvested share awards follows for the periods indicated:

Number of Share Awards Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested share awards outstanding, December 31, 2018 1,186,238
$ 38.86
Granted 563,970
36.65
Vested (505,438 ) 37.80
Canceled or forfeited (25,930 ) 39.93
Unvested share awards outstanding, March 31, 2019 1,218,840
$ 38.25

Unvested share awards outstanding, December 31, 2017 1,108,477
36.06
Granted 640,040
40.28
Vested (471,172 ) 34.75
Canceled or forfeited (31,479 ) 38.48
Unvested share awards outstanding, March 31, 2018 1,245,866
$ 38.66

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~



	Number of Share Awards		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested share awards outstanding, December 31, 2019	1,050,455		$	38.24
Granted	599,766		30.90
Vested	(430,840	)	39.36
Canceled or forfeited	(3,308	)	38.58
Unvested share awards outstanding, March 31, 2020	1,216,073		$	34.22

Unvested share awards outstanding, December 31, 2018	1,186,238		38.86
Granted	563,970		36.65
Vested	(505,438	)	37.80
Canceled or forfeited	(25,930	)	39.93
Unvested share awards outstanding, March 31, 2019	1,218,840		$	38.25

Unvested share awards are generally valued at the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. All shares granted prior to 2019 vest in equal annual installments over a period of three years from the date of grant. All shares granted in 2019 and 2020 to Company employees vest in equal annual installments over a period of four years from the date of grant. Shares granted to the Company's Board of Directors vest over a period of one year.

The following table summarizes the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of grant for shares granted and the aggregate grant date fair value of shares vesting for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data):

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Closing price on date of grant $ 36.65
$ 40.28
Aggregate grant date fair value of shares vesting $ 19,105
$ 16,373



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020		2019
Closing price on date of grant	$	30.90	$	36.65
Aggregate grant date fair value of shares vesting	$	16,958	$	19,105

The total unrecognized compensation cost of ~~$37.9~~$33.0 million for all unvested share awards outstanding at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of ~~2.61~~2.92 years.

Executive share-based awards

Certain of the Company's executives are eligible to receive annual awards of RSUs and PSUs (collectively, the "share units"). Annual awards of RSUs represent a fixed number of shares and vest on December 31st in equal tranches over three years for ~~awards issued~~grants prior to 2019, and over four years for awards issued in ~~2019.~~2019 and 2020. PSUs are initially granted based on a target value. The number of PSUs that ultimately vest at the end of the performance measurement period will be based on the achievement of performance criteria pre-established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. ~~The performance criteria established for the PSUs granted in 2019, 2018 and 2017 include both performance and market conditions.~~ Upon vesting, the share units will be converted to common stock on a one-for-one basis, or may be settled in cash at the Company's option. The share units will accumulate dividends declared on the Company's common stock from the date of grant to be paid subsequent to vesting.

~~The Company has cash settled all tranches of RSUs and PSUs that have vested through December 31, 2018.~~ As a result of the majority of previous settlements being in cash, ~~settlements,~~ all RSUs and PSUs have been determined to be liability instruments and are remeasured at fair value each reporting period until the awards are settled. The RSUs are valued based on the closing price of the Company's common stock at the reporting date. The PSUs are valued based on the closing price of the

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

Company's common stock at the reporting date net of a discount related to any applicable market conditions, considering the probability of meeting the defined performance conditions. Compensation cost related to PSUs is recognized during the performance period based on the probable outcome of the respective performance conditions.

A summary of activity related to executive share-based awards for the ~~periods~~period indicatedfollows:

RSU PSU
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, December 31, 2018 90,612
99,874
Granted 73,062
73,062
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, March 31, 2019 163,674
172,936

Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, December 31, 2017 91,171
105,721
Granted 52,026
52,026
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, March 31, 2018 143,197
157,747



	RSU	PSU
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, December 31, 2019	112,116	125,088
Granted	106,731	106,731
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, March 31, 2020	218,847	231,819

Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, December 31, 2018	90,612	99,874
Granted	73,062	73,062
Unvested executive share-based awards outstanding, March 31, 2019	163,674	172,936

The total liability for ~~these executive share-based awards~~the share units was ~~$3.3~~$2.8 million at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The total unrecognized compensation cost of $8.2 million for ~~unvested executive share-based awards~~these share units at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of ~~2.40~~2.74 years.

Incentive awards

The Company's annual incentive compensation arrangements for employees other than those eligible for the executive share-based awards discussed above provide for settlement through a combination of cash payments and unvested share awards

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

following the end of the annual performance period. The dollar value of share awards to be granted is based on the achievement of performance criteria established in the incentive arrangements. The number of shares of common stock to be awarded is variable based on the closing price of the Company's stock on the date of grant; therefore, these awards are initially classified as liability instruments, with compensation cost recognized from the beginning of the performance period. Awards related to performance periods prior to 2019 ~~included in the~~ ~~summary of activity related to unvested share awards above,~~ vest overthree years and awards related to the 2019 and 2020 performance ~~period will~~periods vest in equal installments over a period of four years from the date of grant. These awards are included in the summary of activity related to unvested share awards above. The total liability for incentive share awards for the ~~2019~~2020 performance period was ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The ~~related~~ total unrecognized compensation cost of ~~$3.8~~$5.6 million for incentive share awards at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 will be recognized over a weighted average remaining period of 4.76 years. The accrued liability and unrecognized compensation cost are based on management's current estimate of the likely outcome of the performance criteria established in the incentive arrangements and may differ from actual results.

The ~~563,970~~599,766 unvested share awards granted during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, as discussed above, included ~~60,290~~114,936 unvested share awards granted under the Company's annual incentive compensation arrangements based on the achievement of established performance criteria for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

Option Awards

A summary of activity related to stock option awards for thethree months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019follows:



	Number of Option Awards		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2019	737,753		$	26.64
Exercised	(60,000	)	25.48
Option awards outstanding and exercisable, March 31, 2020	677,753		$	26.74

Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2018	964,840		26.53
Exercised	(3,910	)	11.14
Canceled or forfeited	(1,960	)	63.74
Option awards outstanding, March 31, 2019	958,970		$	26.52

The intrinsic value of options exercised and related tax benefits was immaterial for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018 follows:~~

Number of
Option
Awards

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2018 964,840
$ 26.53
Exercised (3,910 ) 11.14
Canceled or forfeited (1,960 ) 63.74
Option awards outstanding and exercisable, March 31, 2019 958,970
$ 26.52

Option awards outstanding, December 31, 2017 1,270,688
$ 26.93
Exercised (40,500 ) 26.94
Option awards outstanding, March 31, 2018 1,230,188
$ 26.93

~~The intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and~~ ~~2018. The related tax benefit of options exercised was insignificant for both the three months ended March 31, 2019 and~~ ~~2018~~.2019.

Note 119 Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

Following is a description of the methodologies used to estimate the fair values of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements are typically classified.

Investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities—Fair value measurements are based on quoted prices in active markets when available; these measurements are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. These securities typically include U.S. Treasury securities and certain preferred stocks. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, quoted prices of identical securities in less active markets, discounted cash flow techniques, or matrix pricing models. These securities are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and include U.S. Government agency securities, U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise MBS, preferred stock investments for which level 1 valuations are not available, ~~corporate debt securities,~~ non-mortgage asset-backed securities, single family rental real estate-backed securities, certain private label residential MBS and CMOs, private label commercial MBS, collateralized loan obligations and state and municipal obligations. Pricing of these securities is generally primarily spread driven. Observable inputs that may impact the valuation of these securities include benchmark yield curves, credit spreads, reported trades, dealer quotes, bids, issuer spreads, current rating, historical constant prepayment rates, historical voluntary prepayment rates, structural and waterfall features of individual

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

securities, published collateral data, and for certain securities, historical constant default rates and default severities. Investment securities available for sale generally classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy include certain private label MBS and trust preferred securities. The Company typically values these securities using third-party proprietary pricing models, primarily discounted cash flow valuation techniques, which incorporate both observable and unobservable inputs. Unobservable inputs that may impact the valuation of these securities include risk adjusted discount rates, projected prepayment rates, projected default rates and projected loss severity.

The Company uses third-party pricing services in determining fair value measurements for investment securities. To obtain an understanding of the methodologies and assumptions used, management reviews written documentation provided by the pricing services, conducts interviews with valuation desk personnel and reviews model results and detailed assumptions used to value selected securities as considered necessary. Management has established a robust price challenge process that includes a review by the treasury front office of all prices provided on a monthly basis. Any price evidencing unexpected month over month fluctuations or deviations from expectations is challenged. If considered necessary to resolve any discrepancies, a price will be obtained from an additional independent valuation source. The Company does not typically adjust the prices provided, other than through this established challenge process. The results of price challenges are subject to review by executive management. The Company has also established a quarterly process whereby prices provided by its primary pricing service for a sample of securities are validated. Any price discrepancies are resolved based on careful consideration of the assumptions and inputs employed by each of the pricing sources.

Servicing rights—Commercial servicing rights are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology incorporating contractually specified servicing fees and market based assumptions about prepayments, discount rates, default rates and costs of servicing. Prepayment and default assumptions are based on historical industry data for loans with similar characteristics.

Assumptions about costs of servicing are based on market convention. Discount rates are based on rates of return implied by observed trades of underlying loans in the secondary market. These instruments are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative financial instruments—Fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using widely accepted discounted cash flow modeling techniques. These discounted cash flow models use projections of future cash payments and receipts that are discounted at mid-market rates. Observable inputs that may impact the valuation of these instruments include LIBOR swap rates and LIBOR forward yield curves. These fair value measurements are generally classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

The following tables present assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	March 31, 2019										March 31, 2020
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2			Total
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	34,890	$	—		$	—	$	34,890		$	76,154	$	—		$	76,154
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	—		2,095,993			—		2,095,993			—		2,180,898			2,180,898
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	—		439,331			—		439,331			—		376,492			376,492
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	—		1,605,494			27,904		1,633,398			—		1,173,880			1,173,880
Private label commercial MBS	—		1,481,482			—		1,481,482			—		1,604,814			1,604,814
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	—		414,884			—		414,884			—		528,793			528,793
Collateralized loan obligations	—		1,220,225			—		1,220,225			—		1,094,793			1,094,793
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	—		145,857			—		145,857			—		255,161			255,161
State and municipal obligations	—		384,297			—		384,297			—		271,033			271,033
SBA securities	—		447,469			—		447,469			—		260,388			260,388
Other debt securities	—		—			4,818		4,818
Marketable equity securities	61,980		—			—		61,980			42,195		—			42,195
Servicing rights	—		—			9,585		9,585			—		7,179			7,179
Derivative assets	—		26,850			—		26,850			—		135,720			135,720
Total assets at fair value	$	96,870	$	8,261,882		$	42,307	$	8,401,059		$	118,349	$	7,889,151		$	8,007,500
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	(16,748	)	$	—	$	(16,748	)	$	—	$	(48,973	)	$	(48,973	)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	(16,748	)	$	—	$	(16,748	)	$	—	$	(48,973	)	$	(48,973	)

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, ~~2019~~2020


	December 31, 2018										December 31, 2019
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2			Total
Investment securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	39,873	$	—		$	—	$	39,873		$	70,325	$	—		$	70,325
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	—		1,897,474			—		1,897,474			—		2,022,175			2,022,175
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	—		374,787			—		374,787			—		370,976			370,976
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	—		1,499,514			34,684		1,534,198			—		1,012,177			1,012,177
Private label commercial MBS	—		1,485,716			—		1,485,716			—		1,724,684			1,724,684
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	—		402,458			—		402,458			—		470,025			470,025
Collateralized loan obligations	—		1,235,198			—		1,235,198			—		1,197,366			1,197,366
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	—		204,067			—		204,067			—		194,904			194,904
State and municipal obligations	—		398,429			—		398,429			—		273,302			273,302
SBA securities	—		519,313			—		519,313			—		362,731			362,731
Other debt securities	—		—			4,846		4,846
Marketable securities	60,519		—			—		60,519
Marketable equity securities											60,572		—			60,572
Servicing rights	—		—			9,525		9,525			—		7,977			7,977
Derivative assets	—		29,615			—		29,615			—		43,686			43,686
Total assets at fair value	$	100,392	$	8,046,571		$	49,055	$	8,196,018		$	130,897	$	7,680,003		$	7,810,900
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	(23,874	)	$	—	$	(23,874	)	$	—	$	(19,029	)	$	(19,029	)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	(23,874	)	$	—	$	(23,874	)	$	—	$	(19,029	)	$	(19,029	)

The following table reconciles changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018

Private Label
Residential
MBS

Other Debt
Securities
Servicing Rights
Private Label
Residential
MBS

Other Debt
Securities
Servicing Rights
Balance at beginning of period $ 34,684
$ 4,846
$ 9,525
$ 52,214
$ 5,329
$ 30,737
Gains (losses) for the period included in:
Net income 1,434
—
(662 ) 1,319
—
247
Other comprehensive income (3,264 ) (35 ) —
(2,498 ) 378
—
Discount accretion 2,103
15
—
871
31
—
Purchases or additions —
—
722
—
—
2,448
Sales (4,970 ) —
—
(5,120 ) —
—
Settlements (2,083 ) (8 ) —
(2,666 ) (24 ) —
Transfers into level 3 —
—
—
—
—
—
Transfers out of level 3 —
—
—
—
—
—
Balance at end of period $ 27,904
$ 4,818
$ 9,585
$ 44,120
$ 5,714
$ 33,432
Change in unrealized gains or losses included in OCI for assets held at the end of the reporting period $ (460 ) $ (35 ) $ (1,061 ) $ 378

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

~~Gains on private label residential MBS recognized in net income during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are included in the consolidated statement of income line item "Gain on investment securities, net." Changes in the fair value of servicing rights are included in the consolidated statement of income line item “Other non-interest income~~.” Changes in fair value include changes due to valuation assumptions, primarily discount rates and prepayment speeds, as well as other changes such as runoff and the passage of time. The amount of net unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 that were related to servicing rights held at March 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled approximately $(0.2) million and $1.3 million, respectively, and were primarily due to changes in discount rates and prepayment speeds.

Securities for which fair value measurements are categorized in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 2019 consisted of pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $5 million and private label residential MBS and CMOs with a fair value of $28 million. The trust preferred securities are not material to the Company’s financial statements. Private label residential MBS consisted of senior and mezzanine tranches collateralized by prime fixed rate and hybrid 1-4 single family residential mortgages originated before 2005. Substantially all of these securities have variable rate coupons. Weighted average subordination levels at March 31, 2019 were 19.2% and 14.7% for investment grade and non-investment grade securities, respectively.

The following table provides information about the valuation techniques and unobservable inputs used in the valuation of private label residential MBS and CMOs falling within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):

Fair Value at Valuation Technique
Unobservable
Input

Range (Weighted
Average)
March 31, 2019
Investment grade $ 14,042
Discounted cash flow Voluntary prepayment rate 5.00% - 27.20% (16.10%)
Probability of default 0.10% - 10.00% (2.09%)
Loss severity 15.00% - 100.00% (41.53%)
Discount rate 2.96% - 6.32% (3.86%)

Non-investment grade $ 13,862
Discounted cash flow Voluntary prepayment rate 4.00% - 30.00% (15.50%)
Probability of default 0.00% - 10.00% (2.59%)
Loss severity 15.00% - 100.00% (30.03%)
Discount rate 2.21% - 13.79% (5.04%)

The significant unobservable inputs impacting the fair value measurement of private label residential MBS and CMOs include voluntary prepayment rates, probability of default, loss severity given default and discount rates. Generally, increases in probability of default, loss severity or discount rates would result in a lower fair value measurement. Alternatively, decreases in probability of default, loss severity or discount rates would result in a higher fair value measurement. For securities with less favorable credit characteristics, decreases in voluntary prepayment speeds may be interpreted as a deterioration in the overall credit quality of the underlying collateral and as such, lead to lower fair value measurements. The fair value measurements of those securities with higher levels of subordination will be less sensitive to changes in these unobservable inputs other than discount rates, while securities with lower levels of subordination will show a higher degree of sensitivity to changes in these unobservable inputs other than discount rates. Generally, a change in the assumption used for probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for loss severity given default and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for voluntary prepayment rate.

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

~~The following table provides information about the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of servicing rights as of March 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):~~

Fair Value at Valuation Technique
Unobservable
Input

Range (Weighted
Average)
March 31, 2019
Commercial servicing rights $ 9,585
Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate 1.67% - 18.51% (13.30%)
Discount rate 3.84% - 20.58% (12.70%)

~~Increases in prepayment rates or discount rates would result in lower fair value measurements and decreases in prepayment rates or discount rates would result in higher fair value measurements.~~ ~~Although the prepayment rate and the discount rate are not directly interrelated, they generally move in opposite directions.~~

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

Following is a description of the methodologies used to estimate the fair values of assets and liabilities that may be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements are typically classified.

Impaired loans, OREO and other repossessed assets—The carrying amount of collateral dependent impaired loans is typically based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, which may be real estate or other business assets, less estimated costs to ~~sell.~~sell when repayment is expected to come from the sale of the collateral. The carrying value of OREO is initially measured based on the fair value of the real estate acquired in foreclosure and subsequently adjusted to the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell. Fair values of real estate collateral and OREO are typically based on third-party real estate appraisals which utilize market and income approaches to valuation incorporating both observable and unobservable inputs. When current appraisals are not available, the Company may use brokers’ price opinions, home price indices or other available information about changes in real estate market conditions to adjust the latest appraised value available. These adjustments to appraised values may be subjective and involve significant management judgment. The fair value of repossessed assets or collateral consisting of other business assets may be based on third-party appraisals or internal analyses that use market approaches to valuation incorporating ~~primarily~~a combination of observable and unobservable inputs.

Fair value measurements related to collateral dependent impaired loans, OREO and other repossessed assets are generally classified within ~~levels 2 and~~level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Operating lease equipment—Fair values of impaired operating lease equipment are typically based upon discounted

cash flow analyses, considering expected lease rates and estimated end of life residual values, typically obtained from independent appraisals. These fair value measurements are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

The following tables present the carrying value of assets for which non-recurring changes in fair value have been recorded for the periods indicated (in thousands):


	March 31, 2019								Three Months Ended March 31, 2019			March 31, 2020								Losses from Fair Value Changes
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Losses from Fair Value Changes			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
OREO and repossessed assets	$	—	$	—	$	446	$	446	$	(18	)	$	—	$	—	$	4,693	$	4,693	$	(4,983	)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	24,671	$	24,671	$	(1,916	)	$	—	$	—	$	146,394	$	146,394	$	(8,792	)
Operating lease equipment												$	—	$	—	$	2,110	$	2,110	$	(691	)

March 31, 2018 Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Losses from Fair Value Changes
OREO and repossessed assets $ —
$ 1,674
$ 432
$ 2,106
$ (1,405 )
Impaired loans $ —
$ 12,522
$ 74,895
$ 87,417
$ (3,755 )

Included in the tables above are impaired taxi medallion loans with carrying values of $78.3 million at March 31, 2018. Losses from fair value changes included in the tables above include $2.5 million recognized on impaired taxi medallion loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018. In addition, OREO and repossessed assets reported above included repossessed taxi medallions with carrying values of $1.7 million at March 31, 2018. Losses of $0.5 million were recognized on repossessed taxi medallions during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~



	March 31, 2019								Losses from Fair Value Changes
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
OREO and repossessed assets	$	—	$	—	$	446	$	446	$	(18	)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	24,671	$	24,671	$	(1,916	)

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements are classified at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


		March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018					March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Level	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	1	$	241,451	$	241,451	$	382,073	$	382,073	1	$	766,698	$	766,698	$	214,673	$	214,673
Investment securities	1/2/3	8,374,624		8,374,959		8,166,878		8,167,127		1/2	$	7,874,601	$	7,875,510	$	7,769,237	$	7,769,949
Non-marketable equity securities	2	276,827		276,827		267,052		267,052		2	$	281,714	$	281,714	$	253,664	$	253,664
Loans held for sale	2	28,730		31,140		36,992		39,931		2	$	17,655	$	18,527	$	37,926	$	39,731
Loans	3	22,244,114		22,317,253		21,867,077		21,868,258
Loans, net										3	$	22,933,699	$	23,109,225	$	23,046,317	$	23,350,684
Derivative assets	2	26,850		26,850		29,615		29,615		2	$	135,720	$	135,720	$	43,686	$	43,686
Liabilities:
Demand, savings and money market deposits	2	$	16,912,407	$	16,912,407	$	16,654,465	$	16,654,465	2	$	17,458,932	$	17,458,932	$	17,047,344	$	17,047,344
Time deposits	2	6,766,876		6,776,885		6,819,758		6,820,355		2	$	7,541,839	$	7,602,038	$	7,347,247	$	7,377,301
Federal funds purchased	2	175,000		175,000		175,000		175,000		2	$	—	$	—	$	100,000	$	100,000
FHLB advances	2	5,026,000		5,039,168		4,796,000		4,810,446		2	$	5,144,409	$	5,163,091	$	4,480,501	$	4,500,969
Notes and other borrowings	2	402,701		424,011		402,749		416,142		2	$	428,579	$	449,023	$	429,338	$	473,327
Derivative liabilities	2	16,748		16,748		23,874		23,874		2	$	48,973	$	48,973	$	19,029	$	19,029

Note 1210 Commitments and Contingencies

The Company issues off-balance sheet financial instruments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to fund loans, unfunded commitments under existing lines of credit, and commercial and standby letters of credit. These commitments expose the Company to varying degrees of credit and market risk which are essentially the same as those involved in extending loans to customers, and are subject to the same credit policies used in underwriting loans. Collateral may be obtained based on the Company’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments.

Table of Contents

BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

March 31, 2020

Commitments to fund loans

These are agreements to lend funds to customers as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to fund loans generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Many of these commitments are expected to expire without being funded and, therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements.

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit include commercial, commercial real estate, home equity and consumer lines of credit to existing ~~customers.~~customers, for many of which additional extensions of credit are subject to borrowing base requirements. Some of these commitments may mature without being fully funded.

Commercial and standby letters of credit

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These letters of credit are primarily issued to support trade transactions or guarantee arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

~~BANKUNITED, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED~~

~~March 31, 2019~~

Total lending related commitments outstanding at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 were as follows (in thousands):


Commitments to fund loans	$	502,649	$	344,419
Commitments to purchase loans	774,024		791,759
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit	2,828,533		2,979,737
Commercial and standby letters of credit	85,039		85,543
	$	4,190,245	$	4,201,458

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon advice of legal counsel, the likelihood is remote that the impact of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis is intended to focus on significant matters impacting and changes in the financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes hereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and BKU's ~~2018~~2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 (the ~~"2018~~"2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K”).

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect the Company’s current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” ~~“estimates”~~“estimates,” "future" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the historical performance of the Company or on the Company’s current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company that the future plans, estimates or expectations so contemplated will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to the Company’s operations, financial results, financial condition, business prospects, growth strategy and ~~liquidity.~~liquidity, including as impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if the Company’s underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, the Company’s actual results may vary materially from those indicated in these statements. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A of the ~~2018~~2019 Annual Report on Form ~~10-K.~~10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form

8-K. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Our Response

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic. The pandemic has resulted in governmental authorities implementing numerous measures attempting to contain the spread and impact of COVID-19 such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place orders, and limitations on business activities, including in major markets in which the Company and its clients are located or do business. The COVID-19 pandemic, and governmental responses to the pandemic, have severely negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, lowered equity market valuations, created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets, and increased unemployment levels. This situation is evolving rapidly, and there is a high level of uncertainty about its future effects.

A summary of the effects the COVID-19 pandemic has had on our Company and of our expectations about how our Company may be impacted in the future follows. These matters are discussed in further detail throughout this Form 10Q.

Our results of operations and financial condition at and for the three months ended March 31, 2020 were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Deteriorating economic conditions and a worsening forward looking economic forecast led to a higher provision for credit losses and ACL; as a result, we reported a net loss for the quarter. There is significant uncertainty as to, and we are not currently able to predict, the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on future credit loss expense and future levels of the ACL, but they may be more volatile and may change materially from current levels.

Unrealized losses on our AFS securities increased substantially as a result of the market response to, and dislocation in the wake of, the emerging pandemic. The increase in unrealized losses negatively impacted total stockholders' equity and our tangible book value at March 31, 2020. Since these unrealized losses are recorded in AOCI, they did not impact our regulatory capital ratios. We currently expect to recover the amortized cost basis of our AFS securities.

Levels of criticized and classified assets increased at March 31, 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, a significant number of borrowers have requested relief in the form of temporary payment deferrals. Levels of criticized and classified assets are expected to increase further in the near term as a result of impacts of the pandemic on our borrowers. We re-assess the risk ratings of individual commercial credits as we review requests for and grant temporary payment relief, or as other information comes to our attention that would warrant a re-evaluation of the risk rating. At March 31, 2020, we had not experienced an increase in non-performing assets as a result of the pandemic. It is difficult to predict when, if, or to what extent levels of non-performing assets and delinquencies will increase as a result of the pandemic, although they may do so. Similarly, charge-offs may increase. These impacts may manifest in a delayed fashion due to the impact of temporary payment deferrals and various forms of government assistance that our borrowers may receive.

Our share price has been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 crisis.

Although we took significant measures to prepare for possible disruptions in liquidity, we have not experienced such disruptions to date and continue to have sufficient levels of available liquidity.

The pandemic has impacted our operations . Currently, approximately 97% of our non-branch employees are working remotely. We did not experience any significant operational difficulties, technology failures or outages, or customer service disruptions in our transition to a remote work environment. 76% of our branches remain open to serve customers via drive-through or lobby appointments, operating with reduced hours. Generally, branch locations without drive-through facilities are temporarily closed. We have focused on insuring that our technology systems and internal controls continue to operate effectively in a remote work environment. We have put mechanisms in place to allow us to evaluate all significant modifications to processes and procedures to insure continued effectiveness of our controls. We have not identified any instances in which controls have failed to operate effectively.

Customer demand for our products and services, particularly lending products, may be impacted by the impact of the pandemic on their businesses or by social distancing measures. Potential borrowers impacted by the pandemic may no longer meet our underwriting criteria. We expect loan production in many portfolio segments to be muted in the near term as a result of the pandemic.

In response to the pandemic, we have prioritized risk management and implemented a number of measures to support our customers and employees. Specifically, we have:

Activated our business continuity plan under the leadership of executive management.

Activated our contingency funding plan, enhancing daily monitoring and reporting of liquidity trends and deposit flows, and optimized same day available liquidity.

Established a weekly cadence of Board of Directors meetings.

Pro-actively reached out to all of our borrowers with total credit exposure of $5 million or more, and to all borrowers in certain high-risk segments to assess the potential impact of COVID-19.

Segregated certain segments of the loan portfolio for enhanced monitoring.

Enhanced our workout and recovery staffing and processes.

Enhanced our stress testing framework. Results of internal stress testing indicate that we have sufficient capital to withstand an increase in credit losses materially beyond levels currently expected, and to withstand a severe downturn.

Proactively reached out to our critical third party service providers and evaluated their ability to continue to provide support in the current environment. We have experienced no significant service disruptions.

Expanded certain employee benefits and launched a number of programs to keep our employees healthy and engaged.

Enhanced personal protective measures for employees working at our corporate locations.

Supported our clients through participating in the Small Business Administration’s PPP, and granting payment deferrals and fee waivers on a case-by-case basis.

Temporarily halted new residential foreclosure actions.

We remain confident in our long-term underlying strength and stability, and our ability to navigate these challenging conditions.

Overview

Quarterly Highlights

In evaluating our financial performance, we consider the level of and trends in net interest income, the net interest margin, levels and composition of non-interest income and non-interest expense, performance ratios such as the return on average equity and return on average assets and asset quality ratios, including the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans, non-performing assets to total assets, trends in criticized and classified assets and portfolio delinquency and charge-off trends. We consider growth in earning assets and deposits, trends in funding mix and cost of funds. We analyze these ratios and trends against our own historical performance, our budgeted performance and the financial condition and performance of comparable financial institutions.

Quarterly highlights include:

~~Net income for~~For the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 was $66.0~~2020, the Company reported a net loss of $(31.0) million, or ~~$0.65~~$(0.33) per diluted share, compared to ~~$85.2~~net income of $66.0 million,or ~~$0.77~~$0.65 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. Non-loss share diluted earnings per share, as previously reported,~~2019. Results for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018 was $0.54. Earnings~~2020 were negatively impacted by the application of the CECL accounting methodology, including the impact of COVID-19 on the provision for ~~the three months~~credit losses.

~~ended~~The Company and its banking subsidiary exceeded all regulatory guidelines required to be considered well capitalized at March 31, ~~2019 generated an annualized return on average stockholders' equity of 9.05%~~2020. The Company's and ~~an annualized return on average assets of 0.82%.~~

~~For~~ the ~~quarter ended~~Bank's CET1 risk-based capital ratios were 11.8% and 12.9% at March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. The Company's and the Bank's Tier 1 leverage ratios were 8.5% and 9.3% at March 31, 2020, respectively. We believe we have sufficient capital to withstand a severe downturn.

Our liquidity position remains strong. At March 31, 2020, the Bank had total ~~deposits increased by $205 million,~~same day available liquidity of ~~which $143 million was non-interest bearing demand deposits.~~ approximately $8.5 billion.

Non-interest bearing demand deposits grew by $305 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, to 18.4% of total deposits at March 31, 2020 compared to 17.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2019 and 15.9% of total deposits at March 31, ~~2019, from 14.0% at the end~~2019. The majority of ~~2017.~~

~~Loans and leases, including equipment under operating lease,~~this growth was not directly related to line draws. Total deposits grew by ~~$390~~$606 million ~~during~~for the ~~quarter. At~~three months ended March 31, 2020.

The average cost of total deposits declined to 1.36% for the three months ended March 31, 2020, from 1.48% for the immediately preceding quarter ended December 31, 2019 and 1.67% for the three months ended March 31, 2019. On a spot basis, the average annual percentage yield on total interest-bearing deposits declined to 1.35% at March 31, 2020

from 1.71% at December 31, 2019, and declined further to 1.08% at April 17, 2020. This is a total decline of 0.63% since December 31, 2019, reflecting recent actions taken to reduce the cost of deposits.

The provision for credit losses totaled $125.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, reflecting the application of the CECL methodology and encompassing management's estimate of the expected economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, ~~commercial real estate~~the Company recorded a provision for loan losses, under the incurred loss model, of $10.3 million.

The ACL represented our current estimate of expected lifetime credit losses from the loan portfolio and totaled $251 million, or 1.08% of total loans, ~~represented 34%~~at March 31, 2020. Upon initial adoption of CECL, at January 1, 2020, the ACL was 0.59% of total loans and ~~C&I loans represented 44%~~at December 31, 2019, calculated under an incurred loss methodology, the ACL was 0.47% of total loans.

Pre-tax, pre-provision income totaled $85.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $100.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Pre-tax, pre-provision income for the three months ended March 31, 2020 included a $5.0 million unrealized loss on marketable equity securities, resulting from the impact on markets of the ~~portfolio. By comparison, at~~COVID-19 crisis. Inclusive of this $5.0 million unrealized loss, loss on investment securities was $(3.5) million for the ~~end~~three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to a gain on investment securities of ~~2017, commercial real estate loans represented 38% of total loans while C&I loans accounted~~$5.8 million for ~~42%~~the comparable quarter of the ~~portfolio.~~

~~As expected,~~prior year, a negative variance of $9.2 million. Additional factors contributing to the decline in pre-tax, pre-provision income were a $10.3 million decline in net interest income, ~~decreased~~discussed further below, partially offset by ~~$56.9~~a $7.8 million decrease in total non-interest expense. Pre-tax, pre-provision income is a non-GAAP financial measure. See section entitled "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measurements to ~~$190.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 from $247.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.~~ their comparable GAAP financial measurements.

The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was ~~2.54%~~2.35% for the ~~quarter~~three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020, compared to ~~4.01%~~2.41% for the immediately preceding quarter ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~3.56%~~2.54% for the ~~quarter~~three months ended March 31, ~~2018. The most significant reason~~2019. Both yields on interest earning assets and the cost of interest bearing liabilities declined for the ~~declines in net interest income and the net interest margin was the decrease in accretion on residential ACI loans (formerly covered loans).~~

~~During the quarter~~three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020 as compared to the immediately preceding quarter and to the three months ended March 31, 2019; however, the repricing of interest bearing liabilities, particularly deposits, lagged the repricing of interest earning assets.

Stockholders' equity was impacted by a decline of $291.8 million in accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2020, attributed to an increase in unrealized losses on investment securities available for sale and derivative instruments. The Company ~~repurchased approximately 1.1 million shares~~currently expects to recover the amortized cost basis of its ~~common stock for an aggregate purchase price of~~AFS securities portfolio.

Share repurchases totaling approximately ~~$40~~$101 million ~~at a weighted average price of $35.91 per share.~~during the three months ended March 31, 2020 also impacted stockholders' equity. The Company has temporarily suspended its share repurchase program.

~~Book value~~The Company increased its quarterly cash dividend by $0.02 to $0.23 per common share, ~~grew to $29.71 at March 31, 2019~~reflecting a 10% increase from ~~$29.49 at December 31, 2018 while tangible book value~~the previous quarterly cash dividend of $0.21 per common ~~share increased to $28.92 from $28.71 over the same period.~~

~~As previously disclosed, the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement between BankUnited N.A. ("the Bank") and the FDIC was terminated on February 13, 2019.~~

~~Asset quality remained strong. The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 0.60% and the ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.44% at March 31, 2019.~~share.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on interest earning assets and interest incurred on interest bearing liabilities and is the primary driver of core earnings. Net interest income is impacted by the ~~relative~~ mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, the ratio of interest earning assets to total assets and of interest bearing liabilities to total funding sources, movements in market interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, levels of non-performing assets and pricing pressure from competitors.

The mix of interest earning assets is influenced by loan demand, market and competitive conditions in our primary lending markets, ~~and~~ by management's continual assessment of the rate of return and relative risk associated with various classes of earning ~~assets.~~assets and liquidity considerations. The mix of interest bearing liabilities is influenced by the Company's liquidity profile, management's assessment of the desire for lower cost funding sources weighed against relationships with customers and growth expectations, our ability to attract and ~~is impacted by~~retain core deposit relationships, competition for deposits in the Company's markets and the availability and pricing of other sources of funds.

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, information about (i) average balances, the total dollar amount of taxable equivalent interest income from earning assets and the resultant average yields; (ii) average balances, the total dollar amount of interest expense on interest bearing liabilities and the resultant average rates; (iii) net interest income; (iv) the interest rate spread; and (v) the net interest margin. Non-accrual and restructured loans are included in the average balances presented in this table; however, interest income foregone on non-accrual loans is not included. Interest income, yields, spread and margin have been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis for loans and investment securities that are exempt from federal income taxes, at a federal tax rate of 21% (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,														Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019							2018							2020							2019
	Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Average Balance			Interest ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		Yield/ Rate ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Non-covered loans	$	21,974,453		$	245,010	4.50	%	$	20,783,987		$	196,878	3.83	%
Covered loans	—			—		—	%	498,701			81,309		65.22	%
Total loans	21,974,453			245,010		4.50	%	21,282,688			278,187		5.26	%
Loans															$	22,850,065		$	238,108	4.18	%	$	21,974,453		$	245,010	4.50	%
Investment securities ⁽³⁾	8,520,555			77,607		3.64	%	6,772,449			51,524		3.04	%	8,107,649			56,951		2.81	%	8,520,555			77,607		3.64	%
Other interest earning assets	496,141			4,852		3.96	%	518,857			3,791		2.96	%	646,628			3,720		2.31	%	496,141			4,852		3.96	%
Total interest earning assets	30,991,149			327,469		4.26	%	28,573,994			333,502		4.70	%	31,604,342			298,779		3.79	%	30,991,149			327,469		4.26	%
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(111,074		)					(145,216		)
Allowance for credit losses															(138,842		)					(111,074		)
Non-interest earning assets	1,603,922							1,944,678							1,749,752							1,603,922
Total assets	$	32,483,997						$	30,373,456						$	33,215,252						$	32,483,997
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	1,702,479		5,639		1.34	%	$	1,600,009		4,157		1.05	%	$	2,173,628		6,959		1.29	%	$	1,702,479		5,639		1.34	%
Savings and money market deposits	11,453,980			52,817		1.87	%	10,799,270			29,054		1.09	%	10,412,202			37,756		1.46	%	11,453,980			52,817		1.87	%
Time deposits	6,907,011			38,965		2.29	%	6,314,137			23,150		1.49	%	7,510,070			38,107		2.04	%	6,907,011			38,965		2.29	%
Total interest bearing deposits	20,063,470			97,421		1.97	%	18,713,416			56,361		1.22	%	20,095,900			82,822		1.66	%	20,063,470			97,421		1.97	%
Federal funds purchased	137,378			824		2.40	%	—			—		—	%
Short term borrowings															94,066			367		1.56	%	137,378			824		2.40	%
FHLB advances	4,660,222			27,374		2.38	%	4,459,389			18,297		1.66	%	4,414,830			25,084		2.29	%	4,660,222			27,374		2.38	%
Notes and other borrowings	404,852			5,309		5.25	%	402,840			5,309		5.27	%	429,098			5,290		4.93	%	404,852			5,309		5.25	%
Total interest bearing liabilities	25,265,922			130,928		2.10	%	23,575,645			79,967		1.37	%	25,033,894			113,563		1.82	%	25,265,922			130,928		2.10	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	3,605,131							3,318,952							4,368,553							3,605,131
Other non-interest bearing liabilities	657,360							414,842							749,101							657,360
Total liabilities	29,528,413							27,309,439							30,151,548							29,528,413
Stockholders' equity	2,955,584							3,064,017							3,063,704							2,955,584
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	32,483,997						$	30,373,456						$	33,215,252						$	32,483,997
Net interest income				$	196,541						$	253,535						$	185,216						$	196,541
Interest rate spread						2.16	%						3.33	%						1.97	%						2.16	%
Net interest margin						2.54	%						3.56	%						2.35	%						2.54	%


(1)	On a tax-equivalent basis where applicable. The tax-equivalent adjustment for tax-exempt loans was ~~$4.4~~$3.7 million and ~~$4.2~~$4.4 million, and the tax-equivalent adjustment for tax-exempt investment securities was ~~$1.3~~$0.9 million and ~~$1.5~~$1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.


(2)	~~Annualized~~Annualized.


(3)	At fair value except for securities held to ~~maturity~~maturity.

~~Three months ended March 31, 2019~~ ~~compared to three months ended March 31, 2018~~

Net interest income, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was $185.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to $196.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, ~~compared to $253.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018,~~ a decrease of ~~$57.0~~$11.3 million. The decrease in net interest income was comprised of a decrease in tax-equivalent interest income of ~~$6.0~~$28.7 million and ~~an increase~~a decrease in interest expense of ~~$51.0 million.~~

$17.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019.

The decrease in tax-equivalent interest income was comprised primarily of (i) a ~~$33.2 million~~ decrease in interest income from loans of $6.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019; and (ii) a ~~$26.1 million increase~~decrease in interest income from investment ~~securities.~~ securities of $20.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019.

The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, was 2.35% for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to 2.41% for the immediately preceding quarter ended December 31, 2019 and 2.54% for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Both yields on interest earning assets and the cost of interest bearing liabilities declined for the three months ended March 31, 2020 as compared to the immediately preceding quarter and to the three months ended March 31, 2019; however, the repricing of interest bearing liabilities, particularly deposits, lagged the repricing of interest earning assets.

Decreased tax equivalent interest income ~~from~~on loans for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019 was ~~primarily~~ attributable to a ~~0.76%~~ decrease in the yield, partially offset by an increase of $876 million in the average balance of outstanding loans. The tax-equivalent yield on loans decreased to 4.18% for the three months ended March 31, 2020, from 4.50% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 from 5.26%~~2019. The most significant factor contributing to this decrease in yield was the impact of decreases in benchmark interest rates.

The average balance of investment securities decreased by $412.9 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018, partially offset by a $692 million increase in~~2020 compared to the ~~average balance outstanding.~~

three months ended March 31, 2019. The ~~decline in the~~ tax-equivalent yield on loans was mainly the result of the decrease in accretion on formerly covered residential ACI loans. Both the average balance of and yield on these loans declined. The decline in the average balance resulted from the sale of a substantial portion of the loans during 2018. The yield on the remaining loans declinedinvestment securities decreased to ~~33.00%~~2.81% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~65.22%~~3.64% for the three months ended March 31, 2018, due primarily to changes in assumptions about the remaining period over which accretable yield would be realized, attributable to management's decision to retain certain loans beyond expiration of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.

~~The tax-equivalent yield on loans other than formerly covered residential loans increased to 4.24% for the three months ended March 31, 2019, from 3.83% for the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~2019. The most significant ~~factor~~factors contributing to ~~this increased~~the decrease in yield ~~was~~were the impact of ~~increases~~decreases in benchmark interest ~~rates.~~

~~The average balance~~rates and, to a lesser extent, increased prepayment speeds. This decline is reflective of the short duration of the investment ~~securities increased by $1.7 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2019 from the three months ended March 31, 2018, while the tax-equivalent yield increased to 3.64% from 3.04%. The increase~~portfolio in ~~tax-equivalent yield primarily reflects changes in portfolio composition and resetting of coupon rates on floating-rate securities.~~a falling rate environment.

The primary components of the ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 as~~2020 compared to the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 were a ~~$41.1~~decrease of $14.6 million ~~increase~~ in interest expense on deposits and a ~~$9.1~~decrease of $2.3 million ~~increase~~ in interest expense on FHLB advances. The decreases were primarily the result of decreases in the cost of interest bearing liabilities.

The ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense on deposits was attributable primarily to ~~an increase of $1.4 billion in average interest bearing deposits and an increase~~a decrease in the average cost of interest bearing deposits of ~~0.75%~~0.31% to 1.66% for the three months ended March 31, 2020 from 1.97% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2019. This decrease was generally driven by decreases in market interest rates in 2019.

The decrease in interest expense on FHLB advances resulted from ~~1.22%~~a decrease in the average cost of advances of 0.09% to 2.29% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. This cost increase was driven by the growth of deposits in competitive markets and a rising short-term interest rate environment.~~

~~The increase in interest expense on FHLB advances was primarily a result of an increase in the average cost of advances of 0.72% to~~2020 from 2.38% for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 from 1.66%~~2019. The decrease in cost was driven primarily by decreases in benchmark interest rates. The impact of declines in benchmark rates on the cost of FHLB advances is muted to an extent by the impact of cash flow hedges put in place to manage overall interest sensitivity of the balance sheet. The average balance of advances decreased by $245 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. The increased cost was driven primarily by increased market rates.~~

~~The net interest margin, calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, for~~2020 compared to the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 was 2.54% as compared to 3.56% for~~2019.

For the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. The~~2020, the increase in average non-interest bearing demand deposits as a percentage of total deposits positively impacted the net interest ~~rate spread decreased to 2.16% for~~margin.

While we currently expect the ~~three months ended March 31, 2019 from 3.33% for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The decrease in~~ net interest margin isto expand in the second quarter of 2020, primarily ~~attributed~~as a result of an expected decline in deposit costs, over a longer time horizon, a persistent flat yield curve and a potential increase in non-performing loans attributable to the ~~decline in~~impact of the ~~average balance of and yield~~COVID-19 pandemic could put pressure on ~~formerly covered residential ACI loans discussed above.~~the net interest margin.

Provision for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses

The provision for ~~loan~~credit losses is ~~the amount of expense that, based on our judgment, is~~a charge to earnings required to maintain the ~~ALLL~~ACL at ~~an adequate~~a level ~~to absorb probable~~consistent with management’s estimate of expected credit losses ~~inherent in the loan portfolio~~on financial assets carried at amortized cost at the balance sheet ~~date and that, in management’s judgment, is appropriate under GAAP.~~date. The amount of the provision is impacted by changes in management's reasonable and supportable economic forecast, loan ~~growth,~~originations and runoff, changes in portfolio mix, ~~historical loss rates,~~risk rating migration and portfolio seasoning, the level of charge-offs, ~~and~~changes in specific reserves, changes in expected prepayment speeds and other assumptions. The provision for ~~impaired loans, and management's evaluation of qualitative factors in the determination of general reserves.~~credit losses also includes an amount related to off-balance sheet credit exposures. The determination of the amount of the ~~ALLL~~ACL is complex and involves a high degree of judgment and subjectivity. Our determination of the amount of the allowance and corresponding provision for loan losses considers ongoing evaluations of the credit quality of and level of credit risk inherent in various segments of the loan portfolio and of individually significant credits, levels of non-performing loans and charge-offs, historical and statistical trends and economic and other relevant factors. See “Analysis of the Allowance for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses” below for more information about how we determine the appropriate level of the ~~allowance.~~ACL.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the provision for credit losses totaled $125.4 million, which included $3.6 million related to off-balance sheet credit exposures. The provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2020 reflected the implementation of the CECL methodology and management's estimate of the expected negative economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The provision included approximately $93 million related to changes in the economic forecast since the initial adoption of CECL on January 1, 2020 and was impacted by an increase of approximately $16 million in specific reserves during the quarter, which we believe was also exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the increase in specific reserves related to credits in the Bridge franchise finance portfolio segment. The provision for credit losses, excluding the portion related to off-balance sheet credit exposures, was 0.53% of average loans for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ the Company recorded ~~provisions for loan losses of $10.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively. The provision for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 included $2.8 million related to taxi medallion loans.~~

~~The~~a provision for loan losses, ~~for~~under the ~~quarter ended March 31, 2019 was impacted by (i) an increase~~incurred loss methodology, of $10.3 million.

The evolving COVID-19 situation may lead to increased volatility in the provision ~~related to specific reserves~~ for ~~loans determined individually to be impaired; (ii) the relative impact on~~credit losses and if economic forecasts deteriorate further as a result of COVID-19, the provision ~~of changes in certain quantitative~~for credit losses and ~~qualitative loss factors; and (iii) loan growth.~~

the ACL could increase.

Non-Interest Income

The following table presents a comparison of the categories of non-interest income for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Income from resolution of covered assets, net $ —
$ 3,317
Net loss on FDIC indemnification —
(3,615 )
Deposit service charges and fees 3,830
3,487
Gain on sale of loans, net 2,936
3,501
Gain on investment securities, net 5,785
364
Lease financing 17,186
14,102
Other non-interest income 6,518
6,830
$ 36,255
$ 27,986

~~Declines in income from resolution of covered assets, net and net loss on FDIC indemnification resulted from the termination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement on February 13, 2019.~~



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Deposit service charges and fees	$	4,186		$	3,830
Gain on sale of loans, net	3,466			2,936
Gain (loss) on investment securities, net	(3,453		)	5,785
Lease financing	15,481			17,186
Other non-interest income	3,618			6,518
Non-interest income	$	23,298		$	36,255

The ~~most significant components of~~ gain on sale of loans ~~net are~~for the three months ended March 31, 2020 included gains on sales of the guaranteed portions of SBA loans ~~by SBF~~totaling $1.2 million and gains on sale of ~~government-insured~~government insured residential ~~loans. Gain~~loans totaling $2.3 million.

The loss on ~~sale of loans, net~~investment securities for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018 also~~2020 included ~~$1.7~~$5.0 million ~~related to~~of unrealized losses on marketable equity securities, likely resulting from the impact on markets of the COVID-19 pandemic, offset by $1.5 million in realized gains on available for sale ~~of covered loans.~~

~~Gain~~securities. The gain on investment securities, net for the three months ended March 31, 2019 reflected net realized gains of $4.3 million from the sale of investment securities available for sale and net unrealized gains on marketable equity securities of $1.5 million. ~~Sales of securities during the quarter related primarily to ongoing management of the Company's liquidity position.~~

~~Period over period increases~~The decrease in income from lease financing ~~generally corresponded~~for the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the ~~growth~~three months ended March 31, 2019, is primarily attributed to the increase in ~~the portfolio of~~operating lease equipment ~~under operating lease.~~off-lease.

Non-Interest Expense

The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the periods indicated (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Employee compensation and benefits	$	58,887		$	65,233
Occupancy and equipment	12,369			13,166
Deposit insurance expense	4,403			4,041
Professional fees	3,204			7,871
Technology and telecommunications	12,596			11,168
Depreciation of operating lease equipment	12,603			11,812
Other non-interest expense	14,806			13,399
Total non-interest expense	$	118,868		$	126,690
Less:
Depreciation of operating lease equipment	(12,603		)	(11,812		)
Costs incurred directly related to implementation of BankUnited 2.0	(79		)	(5,892		)
Recurring operating expenses ⁽¹⁾	$	106,186		$	108,986


(1)	Recurring operating expenses is a non-GAAP measure. See section entitled "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measurements to their comparable GAAP financial measurements.

Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Employee compensation and benefits $ 65,233
$ 67,036
Occupancy and equipment 13,166
14,303
Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset —
40,347
Deposit insurance expense 4,041
4,812
Professional fees 7,871
2,875
Technology and telecommunications 11,168
8,214
Depreciation of equipment under operating lease 11,812
9,316
Other non-interest expense 13,399
14,914
$ 126,690
$ 161,817
Employee compensation and benefits

~~Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset~~

~~The FDIC indemnification asset was amortized to zero during the fourth quarter of 2018 in light of the expected termination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.~~

~~Professional Fees~~

~~Professional fees~~Employee compensation and benefits declined by $6.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019, primarily due to a reduction in headcount and a decrease in equity based compensation expense related to the impact of a declining stock price on liability-classified awards.

Professional fees

Professional fees decreased by $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019. The decrease was ~~impacted by~~primarily due to the consulting services in 2019 related to our BankUnited 2.0 ~~initiative and the implementation of CECL.~~initiative.

Other non-interest expense

The most significant components of other non-interest expense are advertising, promotion and business development, costs related to lending activities, loan servicing and deposit generation, insurance, expenses ~~and losses~~ related to ~~OREO, foreclosure~~workouts and ~~repossessed assets,~~foreclosures, regulatory examination assessments, travel and general office expense.

We currently expect to incur near-term costs of approximately $1 million related directly to COVID-19, the most significant of which include additional software licenses related to our participation in the PPP, laptops and other equipment to facilitate employees working remotely and costs related to cleaning, sanitizing and personal protective equipment.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 26.8% and 23.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. An increase in state income taxes contributed to the increase in the effective income tax rate. The effective income tax rate differed from the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 due primarily to income not subject to tax, offset by state income taxes.

~~For more information about income taxes, see~~See Note 75 to the consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements for information about income taxes.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Average interest-earning assets increased ~~$2.4~~$613 million to $31.6 billion tofor the three months ended March 31, 2020 from $31.0 billion for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 from $28.6 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~2019. This increase was driven by a ~~$692~~$876 million increase in the average balance of outstanding loans, ~~and~~offset by a ~~$1.7 billion increase~~$413 million decrease in the average balance of investment securities. A $341 million decrease in average non-interest earning assets was primarily attributed to (i) the decrease in the FDIC indemnification asset, which was amortized to zero during the fourth quarter of 2018 and (ii) a decrease in income taxes receivable related to a discrete income tax benefit recognized during the fourth quarter of 2017, offset by (iii) the recognition of the ROU asset subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019.

Average interest bearing liabilities ~~increased $1.7~~decreased $232 million to $25.0 billion tofor the three months ended March 31, 2020 from $25.3 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2019, ~~from $23.6~~due primarily to decreases in average FHLB advances and short term borrowings of $245 million and $43 million, respectively; offset by an increase of $32 million in average interest bearing

deposits. Average non-interest bearing deposits increased by $763 million to $4.4 billion for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018, due primarily to an increase of $1.4 billion in average interest bearing deposits.~~

~~Average stockholders' equity decreased by $108 million, due primarily to the repurchase of common stock, offset by the retention of earnings.~~

2020.

Investment Securities

The following table shows the amortized cost and carrying value, which, with the exception of investment securities held to maturity, is fair value, of investment securities ~~as of~~at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018				March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	34,879	$	34,890	$	39,885	$	39,873	$	75,238	$	76,154	$	70,243	$	70,325
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	2,087,465		2,095,993		1,885,302		1,897,474		2,209,715		2,180,898		2,018,853		2,022,175
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	437,854		439,331		374,569		374,787		369,967		376,492		366,787		370,976
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	1,625,348		1,633,398		1,539,058		1,534,198		1,185,539		1,173,880		1,001,337		1,012,177
Private label commercial MBS	1,477,465		1,481,482		1,486,835		1,485,716		1,728,610		1,604,814		1,719,228		1,724,684
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	413,318		414,884		406,310		402,458		549,981		528,793		467,459		470,025
Collateralized loan obligations	1,230,643		1,220,225		1,239,355		1,235,198		1,169,469		1,094,793		1,204,905		1,197,366
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	145,296		145,857		204,372		204,067		265,444		255,161		194,171		194,904
State and municipal obligations	374,314		384,297		398,810		398,429		255,602		271,033		257,528		273,302
SBA securities	443,864		447,469		514,765		519,313		262,661		260,388		359,808		362,731
Other debt securities	1,400		4,818		1,393		4,846
Marketable equity securities	61,980		61,980		60,519		60,519
Investment securities held to maturity	10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000		10,000
	$	8,343,826	$	8,374,624	$	8,161,173	$	8,166,878	$	8,082,226	7,832,406		$	7,670,319	7,708,665
Marketable equity securities											42,195				60,572
											$	7,874,601			$	7,769,237

Our investment strategy has focused on insuring adequate liquidity, maintaining a suitable balance of high credit quality, diverse assets, managing interest rate risk, and generating acceptable returns given our established risk parameters. We have sought to maintain liquidity by investing a significant portion of the portfolio in high quality liquid securities including U.S. Treasury securities, GNMA securities, SBA securities and U.S. Government Agency MBS. Investment grade municipal securities provide liquidity and attractive tax-equivalent yields. We have also invested in highly rated structured products, including private-label commercial ~~MBS,~~and residential MBS, collateralized loan obligations, single family rental real estate-backed securities and non-mortgage asset-backed securities that, while somewhat less liquid, provide us with attractive yields. Relatively short effective portfolio duration helps mitigate interest rate risk. Based on the Company’s assumptions, the estimated weighted average life of the investment portfolio as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~4.6~~4.3 years. The effective duration of the investment portfolio as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 was 1.3 ~~years.~~years . The model results are based on assumptions that may differ from actual results.

The following table shows the scheduled maturities, carrying values and current yields for investment securities available for sale as of March 31, 2019, as well as the carrying value and yield of marketable equity securities. Scheduled maturities have been adjusted for anticipated prepayments when applicable. Yields on tax-exempt securities have been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, based on a federal income tax rate of 21% (dollars in thousands):

Within One Year
After One Year
Through Five Years

After Five Years
Through Ten Years
After Ten Years Total

Carrying
Value

Weighted
Average
Yield

Carrying
Value

Weighted
Average
Yield

Carrying
Value

Weighted
Average
Yield

Carrying
Value

Weighted
Average
Yield

Carrying
Value

Weighted
Average
Yield
U.S. Treasury securities $ 34,890
2.37 % $ —
— % $ —
— % $ —
— % $ 34,890
2.37 %
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS 192,616
3.31 % 948,610
3.16 % 823,936
3.07 % 130,831
3.02 % 2,095,993
3.13 %
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS 1,864
3.58 % 16,810
3.77 % 319,631
3.29 % 101,026
3.78 % 439,331
3.42 %
Private label residential MBS and CMOs 343,077
3.84 % 932,320
3.81 % 287,994
3.66 % 70,007
3.52 % 1,633,398
3.78 %
Private label commercial MBS 129,809
4.05 % 1,084,535
4.23 % 258,788
3.61 % 8,350
3.44 % 1,481,482
4.10 %
Single family rental real estate-backed securities 14,909
2.91 % 170,378
3.32 % 229,597
3.56 % —
— % 414,884
3.44 %
Collateralized loan obligations 38,185
4.60 % 771,577
4.17 % 410,463
4.47 % —
— % 1,220,225
4.29 %
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities 11,718
4.22 % 96,250
3.43 % 37,774
3.23 % 115
2.92 % 145,857
3.44 %
State and municipal obligations 1,573
1.96 % 26,242
2.52 % 282,272
3.62 % 74,210
4.27 % 384,297
3.67 %
SBA securities 89,685
3.53 % 206,052
3.43 % 101,485
3.37 % 50,247
3.32 % 447,469
3.42 %
Other debt securities —
— % —
— % —
— % 4,818
15.33 % 4,818
15.33 %
$ 858,326
3.68 % $ 4,252,774
3.79 % $ 2,751,940
3.53 % $ 439,604
3.57 % 8,302,644
3.68 %
Marketable equity securities with no scheduled maturity

61,980
7.39 %
Total investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities

$ 8,364,624
3.71 %

The investment securities available for sale portfolio was in a net unrealized ~~gain~~loss position of ~~$30.8~~$249.8 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 with aggregate fair value equal to ~~100.4%~~96.9% of amortized cost. Net unrealized ~~gains~~losses included ~~$61.9~~$41.4 million of gross unrealized gains and ~~$31.1~~$291.2 million of gross unrealized losses. Investment securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 had an aggregate fair value of ~~$3.9~~$6.0 billion. ~~At March 31, 2019, 99.1%~~The majority of ~~investment securities available for sale were backed by~~ the U.S. Government, U.S. Government agencies or sponsored enterprises or were rated AAA, AA or A, based on the most recent third-party ratings. Investment securities available for sale totaling $63 million were not ratedunrealized losses at March 31, ~~2019. These securities have been determined by management~~2020 related to bethe private label CMBS and CLO portfolio segments, which were in net unrealized loss positions of ~~investment grade quality. Additionally, $14~~$123.8 million ~~of securities acquired at substantial discounts in the FSB acquisition were rated below investment grade~~and $74.7 million, respectively. Unrealized losses at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020 were primarily attributable to widening spreads, resulting in large part from market response to, and dislocation in the wake of, the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. The ~~majority~~ratings distribution of ~~these~~our AFS securities ~~were held~~portfolio at March 31, 2020 is depicted in ~~significant unrealized gain positions.~~the chart below:

We evaluate the credit quality of individual securities in the portfolio quarterly to determine whether ~~any~~we expect to recover the amortized cost basis of the investments in unrealized loss ~~positions are other-than-temporarily impaired.~~positions. This evaluation considers, but is not necessarily limited to, the following factors, the relative significance of which varies depending on the circumstances pertinent to each individual security:

~~our intent~~whether we intend to ~~hold~~sell the security ~~until maturity or for a period~~prior to recovery of ~~time sufficient for a recovery in value;~~its amortized cost basis;

whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis;

~~the length of time and~~The extent to which fair value ~~has been~~is less than amortized cost;

~~adverse changes~~Adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry or geographic area;

Changes in ~~expected cash flows;~~the financial condition of the issuer or underlying loan obligors;

~~collateral values and performance;~~

~~the~~The payment structure and remaining payment terms of the security, including levels of subordination or over-collateralization;

~~changes in the economic or regulatory environment;~~

~~the general market condition~~Failure of the ~~geographic area or industry of the issuer;~~issuer to make scheduled payments;

~~the issuer’s financial condition, performance and business prospects; and~~

~~changes~~Changes in credit ~~ratings.~~ratings;

Relevant market data;

Estimated prepayments, defaults, and the value and performance of underlying collateral at the individual security level.

No securities were determined to be ~~other-than-temporarily~~credit loss impaired atduring the three months ended March 31, ~~2019 and 2018.~~

2020 or other than temporarily impaired during the three months ended March 31, 2019. We do not intend to sell securities in significant unrealized loss positions at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Based on an assessment of our liquidity position and internal and regulatory guidelines for permissible investments and concentrations, it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell securities in significant unrealized loss positions prior to recovery of amortized cost ~~basis. Unrealized losses in the portfolio~~basis, which may be at March 31, 2019 were primarily attributable to an increase in market interest rates subsequent to the date the securities were acquired and, for the CLO portfolio, widening credit spreads. At March 31, 2019, 83%, 14% and 3% of CLOs were rated AAA, AA and A, respectively, based on the most recent third-party ratings, with a weighted-average subordination level at 41.3%, ranging from 26.3% to 43.3%. Management performs a thorough analysis prior to purchasing CLOs, including extensive vetting of the asset manager and stress testing of collateral. Management engages an independent third party to perform ongoing credit surveillance of the CLO portfolio, performs periodic stress testing of the portfolio and continuously monitors exposure, default status, and other relevant security characteristics.maturity.

The timely ~~repayment~~payment of principal and interest on securities issued by the U.S. ~~Treasury~~government, U.S. government agencies and U.S. ~~Government agency and~~government sponsored ~~enterprise securities in unrealized loss positions~~enterprises is explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the ~~full faith and credit of the~~ U.S. Government. ~~Management performed projected cash flow analyses~~As such, there is an assumption of zero credit loss and the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

None of our impaired private label ~~residential MBS~~securities had missed principal or interest payments or had been downgraded by a NRSRO at March 31, 2020. The Company performed an analysis comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected to the amortized cost basis of impaired securities. This analysis was based on a scenario that we believe to be generally

more severe than our reasonable and ~~CMOs, private label commercial MBS, collateralized loan obligations~~supportable economic forecast at March 31, 2020, and ~~non-mortgage asset-backed securities in unrealized loss positions, incorporating CUSIP level~~incorporated assumptions ~~consistent with~~about voluntary prepayment rates, collateral defaults, delinquencies, severity and other relevant factors. Our analysis also considered the ~~collateral~~structural characteristics of each security ~~including collateral default rate, voluntary prepayment rate, severity~~ and ~~delinquency assumptions.~~the level of credit enhancement provided by that structure. Based on the results of this analysis, nowe expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the impaired private label AFS securities. Further information about the portfolio segments evidencing the largest unrealized losses at March 31, 2020, the CMBS and CLO portfolio segments, follows.

For private label CMBS, our analysis of cash flows expected to be collected incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, voluntary prepayment rates, loss severity, delinquencies and recovery lag. In developing those assumptions, we took into account collateral quality and type, loan size, loan purpose and other qualitative factors. We also regularly monitor collateral watchlisted, bankruptcy data, special servicing trends, delinquency and other economic data which would indicate further stress in the sector.

For CLOs, our analysis of cash flows expected to be collected incorporated assumptions about collateral default rates, loss severity, and delinquencies, calibrated to take into account idiosyncratic risks associated with the underlying collateral. In developing those assumptions, we took into account each sector’s performance pre, during and post the 2008 financial crisis. We regularly engage with bond managers to monitor trends in underlying collateral including potential downgrades and subsequent cash flow diversions, liquidity, ratings migration, and any other relevant developments.

The following table presents the distribution of the third-party ratings and subordination levels compared to average stress scenario losses based on our credit ~~losses were projected. Management's~~loss impairment analysis of the ~~credit characteristics of individual securities~~CMBS and the underlying collateral and levels of subordination for each of the single family rental real estate-backed securities in unrealized loss positions is not indicative of projected credit losses. Management's analysis of the state and municipal obligations in unrealized loss positions included reviewing the ratings of the securities and the results of credit surveillance performed by an independent third party. Given the expectation of timely repayment of principal and interest, the impairments were considered to be temporary.CLOs at March 31, 2020:



				Subordination						Weighted Average Stress Scenario Loss
	Rating	Percent of Total		Minimum		Maximum		Average		Weighted Average Stress Scenario Loss
Private label CMBS	AAA	82.0	%	25.7	%	43.5	%	43.1	%	13.5	%
	AA	12.0	%	30.4	%	85.9	%	39.5	%	12.3	%
	A	6.0	%	21.5	%	73.6	%	34.3	%	12.3	%
Weighted average		100.0	%	26.0	%	50.4	%	42.2	%	13.2	%

CLOs	AAA	84.0	%	36.0	%	48.1	%	43.2	%	21.0	%
	AA	13.0	%	27.8	%	40.3	%	32.8	%	22.3	%
	A	3.0	%	25.6	%	29.4	%	27.0	%	23.9	%
Weighted average		100.0	%	34.6	%	46.5	%	41.3	%	21.3	%

For further discussion of our analysis of impaired investment securities AFS for ~~OTTI,~~credit loss impairment see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

Valuations of our investment securities AFS have started to recover subsequent to March 31, 2020. The following table shows the net unrealized loss and carrying value of our AFS securities at the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2020					April 22, 2020 ⁽¹⁾
	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Carrying Value		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Carrying Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	916		$	76,154	$	2,048		$	77,285
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	(28,817		)	2,180,898		(3,101		)	2,163,922
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	6,525			376,492		6,185			376,152
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	(11,659		)	1,173,880		(3,868		)	1,181,671
Private label commercial MBS	(123,796		)	1,604,814		(118,430		)	1,610,180
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	(21,188		)	528,793		(3,697		)	546,284
Collateralized loan obligations	(74,676		)	1,094,793		(70,086		)	1,099,384
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	(10,283		)	255,161		(4,342		)	261,103
State and municipal obligations	15,431			271,033		14,437			270,039
SBA securities	(2,273		)	260,388		(2,310		)	260,350
	$	(249,820	)	$	7,822,406	$	(183,164	)	$	7,846,370

(1) Investments AFS held at March 31, 2020 valued as of April 22, 2020.

We use third-party pricing services to assist us in estimating the fair value of investment securities. We perform a variety of procedures to ensure that we have a thorough understanding of the methodologies and assumptions used by the pricing services including obtaining and reviewing written documentation of the methods and assumptions employed, conducting interviews with valuation desk personnel and reviewing model results and detailed assumptions used to value selected securities as considered necessary. Our classification of prices within the fair value hierarchy is based on an evaluation of the nature of the significant assumptions impacting the valuation of each type of security in the portfolio. We have established a robust price challenge process that includes a review by our treasury front office of all prices provided on a monthly basis. Any price evidencing unexpected month over month fluctuations or deviations from our expectations based on recent observed trading activity and other information available in the marketplace that would impact the value of the security is challenged. Responses to the price challenges, which generally include specific information about inputs and assumptions incorporated in the valuation and their sources, are reviewed in detail. If considered necessary to resolve any discrepancies, a price will be obtained from additional independent valuation sources. We do not typically adjust the prices provided, other than through this established challenge process. Our primary pricing services utilize observable inputs when available, and employ unobservable inputs and proprietary models only when observable inputs are not available. As a matter of course, the services validate prices by comparison to recent trading activity whenever such activity exists. Quotes obtained from the pricing services are typically non-binding.

We ~~have~~ also ~~established~~have a quarterly price validation process to assess the propriety of the pricing methodologies utilized by our primary pricing services by independently verifying the prices of a sample of securities in the portfolio. Sample sizes vary based on the type of security being priced, with higher sample sizes applied to more difficult to value security types. Verification procedures may consist of obtaining prices from an additional outside ~~source or internal modeling, generally based on Intex.~~source. We have established acceptable percentage deviations from the price provided by the initial pricing source. If deviations fall outside the established parameters, we will obtain and evaluate more detailed information about the assumptions and inputs used by each pricing source or, if considered necessary, employ an additional valuation source to price the security in question. Pricing issues identified through this evaluation are addressed with the applicable pricing service and methodologies or inputs are revised as determined necessary. Depending on the results of the validation process, sample sizes may be extended for particular classes of securities. Results of the validation process are reviewed by the treasury front office and by senior management.

The majority of our investment securities are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. U.S. Treasury securities and marketable equity securities are classified within level 1 of the hierarchy. ~~At March 31, 2019~~We are closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on markets, and ~~2018, 0.4%~~on our ability to price securities in our portfolio. While we have observed increased volatility, we believe the fiscal and ~~0.7%, respectively,~~monetary response to the crisis has been effective in supporting liquidity and stabilizing markets. To date, circumstances have not led to a change in the categorization of our ~~investment securities were classified~~fair value estimates within ~~level 3 of~~ the fair value hierarchy. ~~Securities classified within level 3 of the~~

hierarchy at March 31, 2019 included certain private label residential MBS and trust preferred securities. These securities were classified within level 3 of the hierarchy because proprietary assumptions related to voluntary prepayment rates, default probabilities, loss severities and discount rates were considered significant to the valuation. There were no transfers of investment securities between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

For additional discussion of the fair values of investment securities, see Note 119 to the consolidated financial statements.

The following table shows the scheduled maturities, carrying values and current yields for investment securities available for sale as of March 31, 2020, as well as the carrying value and yield of marketable equity securities. Scheduled maturities have been adjusted for anticipated prepayments when applicable. Yields on tax-exempt securities have been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis, based on a federal income tax rate of 21% (dollars in thousands):



	Within One Year				After One Year Through Five Years				After Five Years Through Ten Years				After Ten Years				Total
	Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield		Carrying Value		Weighted Average Yield
U.S. Treasury securities	$	76,154	1.71	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	76,154	1.71	%
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise residential MBS	245,599		1.43	%	961,575		1.64	%	795,467		1.59	%	178,257		1.60	%	2,180,898		1.62	%
U.S. Government agency and sponsored enterprise commercial MBS	2,753		2.36	%	43,245		2.55	%	211,451		1.78	%	119,043		2.43	%	376,492		2.07	%
Private label residential MBS and CMOs	339,172		3.49	%	662,488		3.30	%	137,380		3.04	%	34,840		2.77	%	1,173,880		3.31	%
Private label commercial MBS	67,845		3.67	%	1,192,461		2.53	%	326,299		2.63	%	18,209		2.78	%	1,604,814		2.60	%
Single family rental real estate-backed securities	6,132		3.11	%	221,317		2.85	%	301,344		2.58	%	—		—	%	528,793		2.69	%
Collateralized loan obligations	17,103		2.72	%	916,875		3.01	%	160,815		3.60	%	—		—	%	1,094,793		3.10	%
Non-mortgage asset-backed securities	37,330		3.05	%	151,034		2.84	%	64,917		2.59	%	1,880		2.64	%	255,161		2.80	%
State and municipal obligations	11,584		2.45	%	18,369		3.03	%	195,302		3.99	%	45,778		4.08	%	271,033		3.87	%
SBA securities	53,949		2.57	%	131,222		2.52	%	55,521		2.47	%	19,696		2.38	%	260,388		2.51	%
	$	857,621	2.65	%	$	4,298,586	2.59	%	$	2,248,496	2.38	%	$	417,703	2.29	%	7,822,406		2.52	%
Marketable equity securities with no scheduled maturity																	42,195		7.34	%
Total investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities																	$	7,864,601	2.54	%

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale at March 31, ~~2019 and 2018~~2020 included ~~$29~~$18 million ~~and $37 million, respectively,~~ of ~~commercial~~the guaranteed portion of SBA loans ~~originated by SBF with the intent to sell~~held for sale in the secondary market. ~~Commercial~~At December 31, 2019, loans held for sale ~~are comprised~~included $28.6 million of the ~~portion~~SBA loans held for sale and $9.3 million of other commercial loans ~~guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, primarily the SBA. Loans~~transferred to held for sale. SBA loans are generally sold with servicing retained. ~~Commercial servicing activity did not have a material impact on the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.~~

Loans

The loan portfolio comprises the Company’s primary interest-earning asset. The following tables show the composition of the loan portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Total Percent of Total Total Percent of Total
Residential and other consumer:

1-4 single family residential $ 4,657,344
20.9 % $ 4,606,828
21.0 %
Government insured residential 312,312
1.4 % 265,701
1.2 %
Other 14,341
0.1 % 17,369
0.1 %
4,983,997
22.4 % 4,889,898
22.3 %
Commercial:
Multi-family 2,534,527
11.4 % 2,583,331
11.8 %
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 4,817,629
21.5 % 4,700,188
21.4 %
Construction and land 213,634
1.0 % 227,134
1.0 %
Owner occupied commercial real estate 2,093,373
9.4 % 2,122,381
9.7 %
Commercial and industrial 5,039,938
22.5 % 4,801,226
21.9 %
Commercial lending subsidiaries 2,629,874
11.8 % 2,608,834
11.9 %
17,328,975
77.6 % 17,043,094
77.7 %
Total loans 22,312,972
100.0 % 21,932,992
100.0 %
Premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, net 45,845
44,016

Loans including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs 22,358,817
21,977,008

Allowance for loan and lease losses (114,703 ) (109,931 )
Loans, net $ 22,244,114
$ 21,867,077

~~Total loans, including premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs, increased by $382 million to $22.4 billion at~~



	March 31, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Total			Percent of Total		Total			Percent of Total
Residential and other consumer loans	$	5,634,823		24.4	%	$	5,661,119		24.5	%
Multi-family	1,967,578			8.5	%	2,217,705			9.6	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	4,987,798			21.5	%	5,030,904			21.7	%
Construction and land	222,223			1.0	%	243,925			1.1	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	2,026,510			8.7	%	2,062,808			8.9	%
Commercial and industrial	5,008,573			21.6	%	4,655,349			20.1	%
Pinnacle	1,187,607			5.0	%	1,202,430			5.2	%
Bridge - franchise finance	647,699			2.8	%	627,482			2.6	%
Bridge - equipment finance	649,154			2.8	%	684,794			3.0	%
Mortgage warehouse lending	852,313			3.7	%	768,472			3.3	%
Total loans	23,184,278			100.0	%	23,154,988			100.0	%
Allowance for credit losses	(250,579		)			(108,671		)
Loans, net	$	22,933,699				$	23,046,317

For the three months ended March 31, ~~2019, from $22.0 billion at December 31, 2018.~~

~~Residential and other consumer~~2020, total loans grew by ~~$97~~$29 million. Commercial and industrial loans grew by $353 million and mortgage warehouse outstandings increased by $84 million due to increased utilization. The majority of this growth was not attributable to draws under existing lines of credit. The decline in multi-family balances was driven primarily by continued runoff of the New York portfolio. Residential activity for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019. Multi-family~~2020 included purchases of approximately $286 million in GNMA early buyout loans, ~~declined~~offset by ~~$49~~approximately $202 million ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2019, primarily due to continued run-off~~in re-poolings and paydowns. The residential portfolio, excluding GNMA early buyout loans, experienced a net decline of ~~the New York portfolio. Commercial and industrial loans, inclusive of owner occupied commercial real estate, grew~~approximately $111 million driven by ~~$209 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, driven largely by growth~~higher prepayment speeds in the ~~Florida portfolio.~~

Included in multi-family and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans above at March 31, 2019 were $97 million and $14 million, respectively, in re-positioning loans. These loans, substantially all of which are in New York, provided financing for some level of improvements by the borrower to the underlying collateral to enhance the cash flow generating capacity of the collateral. The primary purpose of these loans was not for construction.

current rate environment.

Residential mortgages and other consumer loans

~~Residential mortgages and other consumer loans totaled $5.0 billion, or 22.4% of total loans, at March 31, 2019 and $4.9 billion, or 22.3% of total loans, at December 31, 2018.~~

The following table shows the composition of residential and other consumer loans at the dates ~~indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs~~indicated (in thousands):


	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Residential and other consumer loans:
1-4 single family residential	$	4,718,053	$	4,664,920	$	4,843,908	$	4,953,936
Government insured residential	313,311		266,729		782,060		698,644
Home equity loans and lines of credits	1,405		1,393
Other consumer loans	12,918		15,947		8,855		8,539
	$	5,045,687	$	4,948,989	$	5,634,823	$	5,661,119

The 1-4 single family residential loan portfolio, excluding government insured residential loans, is primarily comprised of loans purchased ~~on a national basis~~ through established correspondent channels. The portfolio also includes loans originated through retail channels in our Florida and New York geographic footprint prior to the termination of our retail residential mortgage origination business in 2016. 1-4 single family residential mortgage loans are primarily closed-end, first lien jumbo mortgages for the purchase or re-finance of owner occupied property. The loans have terms ranging from 10 to 30 years, with either fixed or adjustable interest rates. At March 31, ~~2019, $131~~2020, $79 million or ~~2.8%~~1.6% of residential mortgage loans were interest-only loans, substantially all of which begin amortizing 10 years after origination. At March 31, 2020, $483 million or 10% were secured by investor-owned properties.

The Company acquires non-performing FHA and VA insured mortgages from third party servicers who have exercised their right to purchase these loans out of GNMA securitizations (collectively, "government insured pool buyout loans" or "buyout loans"). Buyout loans that re-perform, either through modification or self-cure, may be eligible for re-securitization. The Company and the servicer share in the economics of the sale of these loans into new securitizations. The balance of ~~government insured residential~~ buyout loans totaled ~~$288~~$760 million at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The Company is not the servicer of these loans.

The following charts present the distribution of the 1-4 single family residential mortgage portfolio at the dates indicated:

The following table presents the five states with the largest geographic ~~concentration~~concentrations of ~~the~~ 1-4 single family residential ~~portfolio,~~loans, excluding government insured residential loans, ~~is summarized as follows~~ at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


									March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018				Total		Percent of Total		Total		Percent of Total
California	$	1,182,201	25.1	%	$	1,177,221	25.2	%	$	1,249,564	25.8	%	$	1,280,243	25.8	%
New York	986,659		20.9	%	977,146		20.9	%	1,062,712		21.9	%	1,057,926		21.4	%
Florida	642,965		13.6	%	645,020		13.8	%	577,494		11.9	%	597,359		12.1	%
Virginia	188,849		4.0	%	184,756		4.0	%	187,006		3.9	%	189,869		3.8	%
Others ⁽¹⁾	1,717,379		36.4	%	1,680,777		36.1	%
New Jersey									183,749		3.8	%	189,018		3.8	%
Others									1,583,383		32.7	%	1,639,521		33.1	%
	$	4,718,053	100.0	%	$	4,664,920	100.0	%	$	4,843,908	100.0	%	$	4,953,936	100.0	%


~~(1)~~	~~No other state represented borrowers with more than 4.0% of 1-4 single family residential loans outstanding at March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.~~

Commercial loans and leases

~~The~~Commercial loans include commercial ~~portfolio segment includes~~and industrial loans and leases, loans secured by owner-occupied commercial real-estate, multi-family properties ~~loans secured by both owner-occupied~~ and other income-producing non-owner occupied commercial real estate, a limited amount of construction and land loans, ~~commercial and industrial~~SBA loans, mortgage warehouse lines of credit, municipal loans and ~~leases. Management’s loan origination strategy is heavily focused on the commercial portfolio segment, which comprised 77.6%~~leases originated by Pinnacle and ~~77.7% of~~franchise and equipment finance loans ~~as of March 31, 2019~~ and ~~December 31, 2018, respectively.~~leases originated by Bridge.

The following ~~table shows~~charts present the ~~composition~~distribution of the commercial loan portfolio at the dates ~~indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs (in thousands)~~indicated (dollars in millions):

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Commercial:
Multi-family $ 2,536,588
$ 2,585,421
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 4,731,127
4,611,573
Construction and land 198,265
210,516
Owner occupied commercial real estate 1,979,161
2,007,603
Commercial and industrial 4,484,992
4,312,213
National commercial lending platforms
Pinnacle 1,450,316
1,462,655
Bridge - franchise finance 546,489
517,305
Bridge - equipment finance 640,910
636,838
SBF 250,930
252,221
Mortgage warehouse lending 494,352
431,674
$ 17,313,130
$ 17,028,019

Commercial real estate loans include term loans secured by ~~owner and~~ non-owner occupied income producing properties including rental apartments, mixed-use properties, industrial properties, retail shopping centers, free-standing single-tenant buildings, office buildings, warehouse facilities, ~~and~~ hotels, ~~as well as~~ real estate secured lines of ~~credit.~~credit, as well as credit facilities to institutional real estate entities such as REITs and commercial real estate investment funds.

The following ~~charts present~~table presents the distribution of ~~non-owner occupied~~ commercial real estate loans by ~~product~~property type along with weighted average DSCRs and LTVs at March 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands).



	Amortized Cost		Percent of Total		Weighted Average DSCR		Weighted Average LTV
Office	$	2,074,413	28.8	%	$	1.90	58.98	%
Multifamily	2,072,664		28.9	%	1.65		56.38	%
Retail	1,446,599		20.2	%	1.76		57.47	%
Warehouse/Industrial	787,842		11.0	%	1.92		58.14	%
Hotel	619,482		8.6	%	1.90		56.98	%
Other	176,599		2.5	%	1.62		48.57	%
	$	7,177,599	100.0	%	$	1.79	57.43	%

DSCRs and LTVs in the ~~dates indicated:~~

table above are based on the most recent information available, which may not be fully reflective of the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on borrowers' financial condition or property values.

The Company’s commercial real estate underwriting standards generally provide for loan terms of five to seven years, with amortization schedules of no more than thirty years. LTV ratios are typically limited to no more than ~~80%~~75%. ~~Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans typically have risk profiles more closely aligned with that of commercial and industrial loans than with other types of commercial real estate loans.~~ Construction and land loans, included by property type in the table above, represented only ~~1.0%~~1% of the total loan portfolio at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. Construction and land loans are generally made for projects expected to stabilize within eighteen months of completion in sub-markets with strong fundamentals and, to a lesser extent, for-sale residential projects to experienced developers with a strong cushion between market prices and loan basis. 79% of the commercial real estate portfolio had LTVs less than 65% at March 31, 2020.

The New York legislature has enacted a number of rent regulation reform measures that generally have the impact of limiting landlords' ability to increase rents on stabilized units and to convert stabilized units to market rate units. The following table presents the amount of loans secured by New York multi-family properties in which some or all units are rent regulated at March 31, 2020 (in thousands):



Loans secured by stabilized properties subject to rent regulation	$	1,036,885
Loans secured by non-stabilized properties subject to rent regulation	34,751
	$	1,071,636

We believe loans secured by non-stabilized properties may present a heightened level of risk as these loans were underwritten to expected cash flows upon stabilization; those expected cash flows may be impacted by the recent rent regulation reform measures.

The following tables present the distribution of stabilized rent-regulated multi-family loans, by DSCR and LTV at March 31, 2020 (in thousands):



DSCR
Less than 1.11	$	100,281
1.11 - 1.24	318,519
1.25 - 1.50	296,531
1.51 or greater	321,554
	$	1,036,885



LTV
Less than 50%	$	296,187
50% - 65%	577,752
66% - 75%	150,722
More than 75%	12,224
	$	1,036,885

The LTVs in the table above are based on the most recent appraisal obtained, which may not be fully reflective of changes in valuations that may result from the impact of the rent regulation reforms. Loans with DSCR less than 1.11 may be those with temporary vacancies or those for which expenses, particularly real estate taxes, have increased more rapidly than rents. All of the loans included in the tables above are current and performing.

Commercial and industrial loans are typically made to small, middle market and larger corporate businesses and not-for-profit entities and include equipment loans, secured and unsecured working capital facilities, formula-based loans, trade finance, mortgage warehouse lines, SBA product offerings and business acquisition finance credit facilities. These loans may be structured as term loans, typically with maturities of five to seven years, or revolving lines of credit which may have multi-year maturities. The Bank also provides financing to state and local governmental entities generally within ~~its~~our geographic ~~footprint.~~markets. Commercial loans ~~include~~included shared national credits totaling ~~$2.4~~$2.8 billion at March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the majority of which ~~are~~were relationship based loans to borrowers in Florida and New York. The Bank makes loans secured by owner-occupied commercial real estate that typically have risk profiles more closely aligned with that of commercial and industrial loans than with other types of commercial real estate loans.

The following table present the exposure in the commercial and industrial portfolio, including $2.0 billion of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans, by industry at March 31, 2020 (in thousands):



	Amortized Cost		Percent of Total
Finance and Insurance	$	1,262,984	18.0	%
Wholesale Trade	805,281		11.4	%
Educational Services	632,826		9.0	%
Transportation and Warehousing	474,716		6.7	%
Health Care and Social Assistance	472,590		6.7	%
Manufacturing	376,761		5.4	%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management	350,105		5.0	%
Retail Trade	346,915		4.9	%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing	326,027		4.6	%
Information	296,972		4.2	%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services	282,398		4.0	%
Construction	277,027		3.9	%
Accommodation and Food Services	240,734		3.4	%
Other Services (except Public Administration)	230,966		3.3	%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation	211,786		3.0	%
Public Administration	209,215		3.0	%
Utilities	161,178		2.3	%
Other	76,602		1.2	%
	$	7,035,083	100.0	%

Through its commercial lending subsidiaries, Pinnacle and Bridge, the Bank provides equipment and franchise financing on a national basis using both loan and lease structures. Pinnacle provides essential use equipment financing to state and local governmental entities directly and through vendor programs and alliances. Pinnacle offers a full array of financing structures including equipment lease purchase agreements and direct (private placement) bond re-fundings and loan agreements. Bridge has two operating divisions. The franchise finance division offers franchise acquisition, expansion and equipment financing, typically to experienced operators in well-established concepts. The franchise finance portfolio is made up primarily of quick service restaurant and fitness concepts comprising 62% and 31% of the portfolio, respectively. The equipment finance division

provides primarily transportation equipment financing through a variety of loan and lease structures. The Bank's SBF unit primarily originates SBA guaranteed commercial and commercial real estate loans, generally selling the guaranteed portion in the secondary market and retaining the unguaranteed portion in portfolio. The Bank also engages in mortgage warehouse lending on a national basis.

Geographic Concentrations

The ~~geographic~~Company's commercial and commercial real estate portfolios are concentrated in Florida and the Tri-state area. Excluding loans originated through our national platforms, 47% and 44% of commercial real estate loans were secured by collateral located in Florida and the Tri-state area, respectively; while 54% and 28% of commercial and industrial and owner-occupied real estate loans were to borrowers in Florida and the Tri-state area, respectively.

The following table presents the five states with the largest concentration of ~~the~~ commercial loans and ~~direct financing~~ leases ~~in the~~originated through our national platforms, ~~is summarized as follows~~including Bridge, Pinnacle, SBF and our mortgage warehouse finance unit at the dates ~~indicated. Amounts include premiums, discounts and deferred fees and costs~~indicated (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Florida $ 584,632
17.3 % $ 595,843
18.1 %
California 524,925
15.5 % 498,842
15.1 %
Virginia 161,333
4.8 % 153,619
4.7 %
Utah 155,338
4.6 % 156,732
4.7 %
Iowa 151,947
4.5 % 151,036
4.6 %
Arizona 144,122
4.3 % 149,087
4.5 %
Texas 150,330
4.4 % 150,878
4.6 %
All others (1) 1,510,370
44.6 % 1,444,656
43.7 %
$ 3,382,997
100.0 % $ 3,300,693
100.0 %



	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Total		Percent of Total		Total		Percent of Total
California	$	542,068	15.1	%	$	585,222	16.5	%
Florida	459,960		12.8	%	465,146		13.1	%
New Jersey	259,213		7.2	%	178,514		5.0	%
Maryland	160,738		4.5	%	152,663		4.3	%
Virginia	154,336		4.3	%	142,856		4.0	%
All others	2,015,684		56.1	%	2,021,994		57.1	%
	$	3,591,999	100.0	%	$	3,546,395	100.0	%

Operating lease equipment, net


~~(1)~~	~~No other state represented borrowers with more than 4.0% of loans outstanding at March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.~~

~~At March 31, 2019, 37.4% and 24.9%~~Operating lease equipment, net of commercial loans were originated within the Florida and New York portfolios, respectively. At December 31, 2018, 37.0% and 25.4% of commercial loans were originated within the Florida and New York portfolios, respectively.

~~Equipment under Operating Lease~~

~~Equipment under operating lease~~accumulated depreciation totaled ~~$710~~$685 million at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020, including off-lease equipment, net of accumulated depreciation totaling $76 million. The portfolio ~~consisted~~consists primarily of railcars, non-commercial aircraft and other transport equipment. We have a total of ~~5,571~~5,317 railcars with a carrying value of ~~$437~~$415 million at March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, including hoppers, tank cars, boxcars, auto carriers, center beams and gondolas leased to North American commercial ~~end-users.~~end users. The largest concentrations of rail cars were ~~2,261~~2,414 hopper cars and ~~1,595~~1,594 tank cars, primarily used to ship sand and petroleum products, respectively, for the energy industry. ~~Equipment with a carrying value of $289 million at March 31, 2019 was leased to companies for use in the energy industry.~~

The chart below presents ~~equipment under~~ operating lease equipment by type at the dates indicated:

At March 31, 2020, the breakdown of carrying values of operating lease equipment, excluding equipment off-lease, by the year current leases are scheduled to expire was as follows (in thousands):



Years Ending December 31:
2020	$	80,348
2021	61,399
2022	72,047
2023	41,703
2024	31,333
Thereafter through 2034	322,135
	$	608,965

Asset Quality

Commercial Loans

We have a robust credit risk management framework, an experienced team to lead the workout and recovery process for the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and a dedicated internal credit review function. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have further enhanced our workout and recovery staffing and processes. Loan performance is monitored by our credit administration and workout and recovery departments. Generally, commercial relationships with balances in excess of defined thresholds are re-evaluated at least annually and more frequently if circumstances indicate that a change in risk rating may be warranted. The defined thresholds range from $1 million to $3 million. Homogenous groups of smaller balance commercial loans may be monitored collectively. ~~Additionally,~~The credit quality and risk rating of commercial loans as well as our underwriting and portfolio management practices are regularly reviewed by our internal credit review department. The Company utilizes a 13 grade internal asset risk classification system as part of its efforts to monitor and maintain commercial asset quality. Loans exhibiting potential credit weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention and, that if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment capacity of the borrower are categorized as special mention. These borrowers may exhibit negative financial trends or erratic financial performance, strained liquidity, marginal collateral coverage, declining industry trends or weak management. Loans with well-defined credit weaknesses that may result in a loss if the deficiencies are not corrected are assigned a risk rating of substandard. These borrowers may exhibit payment defaults, inadequate cash flows, operating losses, increasing balance sheet leverage, project cost overruns, unreasonable construction delays, exhausted interest reserves, declining collateral values, frequent overdrafts or past due real estate taxes. Loans with weaknesses so severe that collection in full is highly questionable or improbable, but because of certain reasonably specific pending factors have not been charged off, are assigned an internal risk rating of doubtful.

We believe internal risk rating is the best indicator of the credit quality of commercial loans. The following table summarizes the Company's commercial credit exposure, based on internal risk rating, at the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Percent of Commercial Loans		Amortized Cost		Percent of Commercial Loans
Pass	$	16,841,243	96.0	%	$	17,054,702	97.5	%
Special mention	288,148		1.6	%	72,881		0.4	%
Substandard accruing	238,786		1.4	%	180,380		1.0	%
Substandard non-accruing	181,278		1.0	%	185,906		1.1	%
	$	17,549,455	100.0	%	$	17,493,869	100.0	%

The charts below present trends in criticized and classified loans from December 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020 (in millions):

Criticized and classified loans increased by $269 million, to 3.1% of total loans at March 31, 2020 from 1.9% of total loans at December 31, 2019. The increase was in the special mention and substandard accruing categories. As reflected in the charts above, the majority of the increase was in the franchise finance portfolio. Approximately 90% of the downgrades in franchise finance during the quarter were directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the emerging nature of and uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 crisis, we will likely see further impacts on the risk rating distribution of the loan portfolio in the future.

Potential Problem Loans

Potential problem loans have been identified by management as those commercial loans included in the "substandard accruing" risk rating category. These loans are typically performing, but possess specifically identified credit weaknesses that, if not remedied, may lead to a downgrade to non-accrual status and identification as impaired in the near-term.

The following table summarizes the Company's substandard accruing loans, substantially all of which were current as to principal and interest, at the dates indicated (in thousands):

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Balance Percent of Total Balance Percent of Total
Pass $ 16,998,822
98.2 % $ 16,728,534
98.2 %
Special mention 75,883
0.4 % 81,070
0.5 %
Substandard 229,170
1.3 % 210,026
1.2 %
Doubtful 9,255
0.1 % 8,389
0.1 %
$ 17,313,130
100.0 % $ 17,028,019
100.0 %



	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Amortized Cost		Percent of Loan Segment		Amortized Cost		Percent of Loan Segment
Multi-family	$	35,691	1.8	%	$	26,797	1.2	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	46,346		0.9	%	52,697		1.0	%
Construction and land	888		0.4	%	—		—	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	24,520		1.2	%	16,241		0.8	%
Commercial and industrial	77,810		1.6	%	43,518		0.9	%
Bridge - franchise finance	53,531		8.3	%	41,127		6.6	%
	$	238,786			$	180,380

~~Equipment Under~~ Management closely monitors each of these loans as well as indicators of potential negative trends developing within any particular portfolio segment. The following table presents loan portfolio sub-segments that, in light of evolving conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, have been identified for enhanced monitoring as of March 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost		Percent of Total Loans		Amount Criticized or Classified		Amount Non-Performing
Retail - CRE	$	1,446,599	6.2	%	$	35,535	$	11,202
Retail - C&I	346,915		1.5	%	6,644		4,499
BFG - franchise finance	647,699		2.8	%	272,214		37,635
Hotel	619,482		2.7	%	37,831		22,334
Airlines	84,649		0.4	%	—		—
Cruise line	71,374		0.3	%	—		—
Energy	46,348		0.2	%	—		—
	$	3,263,066	14.1	%	$	352,224	$	75,670

It is likely that the amounts of criticized or classified loans and amounts of non-performing loans presented above do not reflect the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Retail Exposure in the CRE Portfolio

The predominant collateral type supporting this segment is both anchored and un-anchored retail centers, including some mixed-use properties with a significant retail component. We estimate that approximately 60% of this sub-segment is supported by what we consider to be essential or moderately essential businesses in the context of the pandemic. We have no significant large shopping mall or "big box" exposure. The weighted average LTV for this sub-segment is 57.5% and 84% has LTVs less than 65%, based on the most recently available information.

Retail Exposure in the C&I Portfolio

This is a well-diversified sub-segment by industry. The largest exposure is to gas stations, generally with convenience stores, representing $97 million, or 28% of the sub-segment. 63% of loans in this sub-segment are collateralized by owner-occupied real estate.

BFG - Franchise Finance

The following table presents the franchise portfolio by concept at March 31, 2020:



	Amortized Cost		Percentage of BFG Franchise Finance
Restaurant concepts:
Burger King	$	67,087	10.3	%
Dunkin Donuts	39,366		6.1	%
Sonic	27,907		4.3	%
Domino's	26,239		4.1	%
Jimmy Johns	23,436		3.6	%
Other	217,083		33.5	%
	401,118		61.9	%
Non-restaurant concepts:
Planet Fitness	107,301		16.6	%
Orange Theory Fitness	86,664		13.4	%
Other	52,616		8.1	%
	246,581		38.1	%
	$	647,699	100.0	%

The quick service restaurant sector broadly has been experiencing margin pressure due to rising labor costs and technological disruption in the form of app-based food delivery services. Concepts that have adopted digital ordering, delivery, take-out and drive through models may be better positioned in light of COVID-19 related social distancing measures. Fitness concepts, which have been the better performing group in this portfolio sub-segment may now be under increased stress due to social distancing measures arising from the pandemic.

Hotel

The following chart presents hotel exposure at March 31, 2020:

This sub-segment is experiencing significant disruption in revenue due to social distancing measures arising from the pandemic. The weighted average LTV for this sub-segment is 57% and 78% has LTVs less than 65%, based on the most recent information available. The majority of our hotel exposure is in Florida at 77%, followed by 13% in New York. This sub-segment includes $61 million in SBA loans, of which $16 million is guaranteed.

Airlines

There are three lending relationships in this sub-segment. It is our understanding that these borrowers are expecting to directly benefit from government relief programs enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Energy

Recent declines in oil prices have elevated this sub-segment to a level of enhanced monitoring. The Company's energy exposure in the loan portfolio is not material; approximately 84% of these loans are secured by marine transport equipment.

Bridge also had exposure to the energy industry in the operating lease equipment portfolio totaling $291 million at March 31, 2020, consisting of $232 million in railcars, $39 million in helicopters and $19 million in vessels.

If current conditions persist, further deterioration could occur in this sector.

Operating Lease Equipment, net

Two operating lease relationships with a carrying value of assets under lease totaling ~~$72~~$30 million, all of which ~~$36 million~~ were exposures to the energy industry, were internally risk rated substandard at March 31, ~~2019. The present~~2020. On a quarterly basis, management performs an impairment analysis on assets with indicators of potential impairment. Potential impairment indicators include evidence of changes in residual value, macro-economic conditions, an extended period of ~~remaining lease payments on these leases and their residual values totaled approximately $41 million and $53 million, respectively~~time off-lease, criticized or classified status, or management's intention to sell the asset at an amount potentially below its carrying value. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there were 13 operating leases for which a triggering event was met. Based on a recoverability analysis performed, the Company recognized an impairment charge of ~~which $36~~$0.7 million ~~and $50 million, respectively were exposures~~during three months ended March 31, 2020 related to ~~the~~one operating lease relationship; this was not an energy ~~industry. One relationship has been restructured to date, with no decrease in total minimum lease payments.~~exposure.

The primary risks inherent in the equipment leasing business are asset risk resulting from ownership of the equipment on ~~operating~~ lease and credit risk. Asset risk arises from fluctuations in supply and demand for the underlying leased equipment. The equipment is leased to commercial ~~end-users~~end users with original lease terms generally ranging from three to ten ~~years at March 31, 2019.~~years. We are exposed to the risk that, at the end of the lease term, the value of the asset will be lower than expected, potentially resulting in reduced future lease income over the remaining life of the asset or a lower sale value. Asset risk may also lead to changes in depreciation as a result of changes in the residual values of the ~~operating lease~~leased assets or through impairment of asset carrying values. ~~Asset risk may be higher for long-lived equipment such as railcars, which have useful lives of approximately 35-50 years.~~

Asset risk is evaluated and managed by a dedicated internal staff of asset managers, managed by seasoned equipment finance professionals with a broad depth and breadth of experience in the leasing business. Additionally, we have partnered with an industry leading, experienced service provider who provides fleet management and servicing relating to the railcar fleet, including lease administration and reporting, a Regulation Y compliant full service maintenance program and railcar re-marketing. Risk is managed by setting appropriate residual values at inception and systematic reviews of residual values based on independent appraisals, performed at least annually. Additionally, our internal management team and our external service provider closely follow the rail markets, monitoring traffic flows, supply and demand trends and the impact of new technologies and regulatory requirements. Demand for railcars is sensitive to shifts in general and industry specific economic

and market trends and shifts in trade flows from specific events such as natural or man-made disasters. We seek to mitigate these risks by leasing to a stable ~~end-user~~end user base, by maintaining a relatively young and diversified fleet of assets that are expected to maintain stronger and more stable utilization rates despite impacts from unexpected events or cyclical trends and by staggering lease maturities. We regularly monitor the impact of oil prices on the estimated residual value of rail cars being used in the petroleum/natural gas extraction sector.

Credit risk in the leased equipment portfolio results from the potential default of lessees, possibly driven by obligor specific or industry-wide conditions, and is economically less significant than asset risk, because in the operating lease business, there is no extension of credit to the obligor. Instead, the lessor deploys a portion of the useful life of the asset. Credit losses, if any, will manifest through reduced rental income due to missed payments, time off lease, or lower rental payments due either to a restructuring or re-leasing of the asset to another obligor. Credit risk in the operating lease portfolio is managed and monitored utilizing credit administration infrastructure, processes and procedures similar to those used to manage and monitor credit risk in the commercial loan portfolio. We also mitigate credit risk in this portfolio by leasing ~~only~~ to high credit quality obligors.

Residential and Other Consumer Loans

~~The majority of our~~Our residential mortgage portfolio, excluding GNMA buyout loans, consists primarily of loans purchased through established correspondent channels. Most of our purchases are of performing jumbo mortgage loans which have FICO scores above 700, primarily are owner-occupied and full documentation, and have a current LTV of 80% or less although loans with

LTVs higher than 80% may be extended to selected credit-worthy borrowers. We perform due diligence on the purchased loans for credit, compliance, counterparty, payment history and property valuation.

We have a dedicated residential credit risk management function, and the residential portfolio is monitored by our internal credit review function. Residential mortgage loans and consumer loans are not individually risk rated. Delinquency status is the primary measure we use to monitor the credit quality of these loans. We also consider original LTV and most recently available FICO score to be significant indicators of credit quality for the 1-4 single family residential portfolio, excluding ~~FSB loans and~~ government insured residential loans.

The following ~~tables show~~charts present information about the ~~distribution of~~ 1-4 single family residential ~~loans,~~portfolio, excluding ~~FSB loans and~~ government insured ~~residential~~ loans, by ~~original~~ FICO distribution, LTV distribution and ~~LTV as of~~vintage at March 31, 2020:

In the ~~dates indicated:~~

March 31, 2019
FICO
LTV 720 or less 721 - 740 741 - 760 761 or
greater Total
60% or less 2.3 % 2.8 % 4.3 % 17.6 % 27.0 %
60% - 70% 2.8 % 2.4 % 3.8 % 13.4 % 22.4 %
70% - 80% 3.7 % 4.6 % 8.4 % 28.5 % 45.2 %
More than 80% 0.4 % 0.8 % 1.0 % 3.2 % 5.4 %
9.2 % 10.6 % 17.5 % 62.7 % 100.0 %

December 31, 2018
FICO
LTV 720 or less 721 - 740 741 - 760 761 or
greater Total
60% or less 2.4 % 2.8 % 4.4 % 18.2 % 27.8 %
60% - 70% 2.7 % 2.4 % 3.8 % 13.4 % 22.3 %
70% - 80% 3.5 % 4.6 % 8.4 % 28.3 % 44.8 %
More than 80% 0.4 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 3.1 % 5.1 %
9.0 % 10.6 % 17.4 % 63.0 % 100.0 %
charts above, FICOs are generally updated at least annually and LTVs are typically based on valuation at origination.

At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the majority of the 1-4 single family residential loan portfolio, excluding ~~FSB loans and~~ government insured residential loans, ~~had the following characteristics: substantially all were full documentation with a weighted-average FICO score of 764 and a weighted-average LTV of 67.8%. The majority of this portfolio~~ was owner-occupied, with ~~85.4%~~82.4% primary residence, ~~7.4%~~7.6% second homes and ~~7.2%~~10.0% investment properties. ~~In terms of vintage, 40.1% of the portfolio was originated pre-2016, 19.8% in 2016, 22.2% in 2017, 15.8% in 2018 and 2.1% in 2019.~~

1-4 single family residential loans, excluding government insured residential loans, past due more than 30 days totaled ~~$190.3~~$59.8 million and ~~$23.5~~$66.3 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The increase in loans past due more than 30 days is procedural, attributable to the transfer of the servicing of the residential loan portfolio during the first quarter of 2019. Delinquency levels are expected to normalize over the course of the next quarter. The amount of these loans 90 days or more past due was ~~$6.6~~$11.6 million and ~~$7.0~~$11.1 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

~~Other Consumer Loans~~

~~Substantially all~~At March 31, 2020, $2 million of other consumer loans was past due more than 30 days and all were current at ~~March 31, 2019 and~~ December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements presents additional information about key credit quality indicators and delinquency status of the loan portfolio.

~~Impaired Loans and~~ Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets generally consist of (i) non-accrual loans, including loans that have been modified in TDRs and placed on non-accrual status, (ii) accruing loans that are more than 90 days contractually past due as to interest or principal, excluding ~~ACI loans and~~ government insured residential loans, and (iii) OREO and repossessed assets. Impaired loans also typically include loans modified in TDRs that are accruing and ACI loans or pools for which expected cash flows at acquisition (as adjusted for any additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition) have been revised downward since acquisition, other than due to changes in interest rate indices and prepayment assumptions.

The following table ~~summarizes~~and charts summarize the Company's ~~impaired~~non-performing loans and non-performing assets at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Non-accrual loans
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential	$	14,561		$	18,877
Other consumer loans	2,395			17
Total residential and other consumer loans	16,956			18,894
Commercial:
Multi-family	6,011			6,138
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	36,355			40,097
Construction and land	3,439			3,191
Owner occupied commercial real estate	26,147			27,141
Commercial and industrial	60,118			74,757
Bridge - franchise finance	37,635			13,631
Bridge - equipment finance	11,561			20,939
Total commercial loans	181,266			185,894
Total non-performing loans	198,222			204,788
OREO and repossessed assets	7,712			3,897
Total non-performing assets	$	205,934		$	208,685

Non-performing loans to total loans ⁽¹⁾	0.85		%	0.88		%
Non-performing assets to total assets⁽¹⁾	0.61		%	0.63		%
ACL to total loans	1.08		%	0.47		%
ACL to non-performing loans	126.41		%	53.07		%
Provision for credit losses to average loans	0.53		%	0.04		%
Net charge-offs to average loans ⁽²⁾	0.13		%	0.05		%

March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Non-accrual loans
Residential and other consumer:
1-4 single family residential $ 7,355
$ 6,316
Other consumer loans 283
288
Total residential and other consumer loans 7,638
6,604
Commercial:
Multi-family 25,298
25,560
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate 25,459
16,050
Construction and land 9,790
9,923
Owner occupied commercial real estate 18,439
19,789
Commercial and industrial 24,346
28,584
Commercial lending subsidiaries 22,224
22,733
Total commercial loans 125,556
122,639
Total non-accrual loans 133,194
129,243
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing —
650
Total non-performing loans 133,194
129,893
OREO 10,691
8,432
Repossessed assets 1,085
1,085
Total non-performing assets 144,970
139,410
Performing TDRs 24,613
7,898
Total impaired loans and non-performing assets $ 169,583
$ 147,308

Non-performing loans to total loans ⁽¹⁾
0.60 % 0.59 %
Non-performing assets to total assets 0.44 % 0.43 %
ALLL to total loans ⁽¹⁾
0.51 % 0.50 %
ALLL to non-performing loans 86.12 % 84.63 %
Net charge-offs to average loans⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
0.10 % 0.28 %


(1)	~~Total~~Non-performing loans ~~for purposes~~and assets include the guaranteed portion of ~~calculating these ratios include premiums, discounts~~non-accrual SBA loans totaling $49.1 million or 0.21% of total loans and ~~deferred fees~~0.15% of total assets, at March 31, 2020; compared to $45.7 million or 0.20% of total loans and ~~costs.~~0.14% of total assets, at December 31, 2019.


(2)	Annualized for March 31, ~~2019.~~


~~(3)~~	~~The ratio of charge-offs of taxi medallion loans to average total loans was 0.18% for the year ended December 31, 2018.~~2020.

~~Contractually delinquent ACI~~

The following chart presents trends in non-performing loans ~~with remaining accretable yield are~~by non-performing asset ratios:

The following chart presents trends in non-performing loans by portfolio sub-segment (in millions):

The ultimate impact of the recent and evolving COVID-19 pandemic may not be reflected ~~as non-accrual loans and are not considered to be~~in the level of non-performing assets ~~because accretion continues~~reported above. The potential effect on non-performing asset levels may be delayed in the near-term due to ~~be recorded~~government assistance and loan deferral programs recently put in income. Accretion continues to be recorded as long as there is an expectation of future cash flows in excess of carrying amount from these loans. The carrying value of ACI loans contractually delinquent by more than 90 days but on which income was still being recognized was insignificant at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. place.

Contractually delinquent government insured residential loans are excluded from non-performing loans as defined in the table ~~above.~~above due to their government guarantee. The carrying value of such loans contractually delinquent by more than 90 days was ~~$247~~$623 million and ~~$218~~$529 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The increase of ACL to total loans and ACL to non-performing loans ratios at March 31, 2020 from December 31, 2019 is attributable to the adoption of CECL effective January 1, 2020 and the impact on the provision for credit losses recorded during the first quarter of 2020 resulting from changes to our economic forecast as a result of COVID-19.

Commercial ~~loans, other than ACI~~ loans are placed on non-accrual status when (i) management has determined that full repayment of all contractual principal and interest is in doubt, or (ii) the loan is past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Residential and consumer loans, other than ~~ACI loans and~~ government insured pool buyout loans, are generally placed on non-accrual status when they are 90 days ~~of interest is due and unpaid.~~past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, uncollected interest accrued is reversed and charged to interest income. Commercial loans are returned to accrual status only after all past due principal and interest has been collected and full repayment of remaining contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured. Residential loans are generally returned to accrual status when less than 90 days ~~of interest is due and unpaid.~~past due. Past due status of loans is determined based on the contractual next payment due date. Loans less than 30 days past due are reported as current.

TDRs

A loan modification is considered a TDR if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise grant. These concessions may take the form of temporarily or permanently reduced interest rates, payment abatement periods, restructuring of payment terms, extensions of maturity at below market terms, or in some cases, partial forgiveness of principal. ~~Under GAAP, modified ACI loans accounted for in pools are not accounted for as TDRs and are not separated from their respective pools when modified.~~ Included in TDRs are residential loans to borrowers who have not reaffirmed their debt discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Under recently issued inter-agency and authoritative guidance and consistent with the CARES Act, short-term (generally periods of six months or less) deferrals or modifications related to COVID-19 will typically not be categorized as TDRs. See the section below entitled "Loss Mitigation Strategies - Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic" for further discussion.

The following table summarizes loans that have been modified in TDRs at ~~March 31, 2019~~the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	Number of TDRs	Recorded Investment		Related Specific Allowance		March 31, 2020					December 31, 2019
Residential and other consumer	67	$	10,891	$	9
						Number of TDRs	Amortized Cost		Related Specific Allowance		Number of TDRs	Amortized Cost		Related Specific Allowance
Residential and other consumer ⁽¹⁾						281	$	45,780	$	37	361	$	57,117	$	12
Commercial	26	44,364		3,336		33	62,387		7,710		25	56,736		6,311
	93	$	55,255	$	3,345	314	$	108,167	$	7,747	386	$	113,853	$	6,323

~~Potential Problem Loans~~


(1)	Includes 265 government insured residential loans modified in TDRs totaling $41.9 million ~~at March 31, 2019, substantially all of which were current as to principal and interest~~ at March 31, 2020; and 346 government insured residential loans modified in TDRs totaling $53.4 million at December 31, 2019.

See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about TDRs.

Loss Mitigation Strategies

Criticized or classified commercial loans in excess of certain thresholds are reviewed quarterly by the Criticized Asset Committee, which evaluates the appropriate strategy for collection to mitigate the amount of credit losses. Criticized asset reports for each relationship are presented by the assigned relationship manager and credit officer to the Criticized Asset Committee until such time as the relationships are returned to a satisfactory credit risk rating or otherwise resolved. The Criticized Asset Committee may require the transfer of a loan to our workout and recovery department, which is tasked to effectively manage the loan with the goal of minimizing losses and expenses associated with restructure, collection and/or liquidation of collateral. Commercial loans with a risk rating of ~~substandard;~~substandard, impaired loans on non-accrual ~~status;~~status, loans modified as ~~TDRs;~~TDRs or assets classified as OREO or repossessed assets are usually transferred to workout and recovery. Oversight of the workout and recovery department is provided by the Asset Recovery Committee.

Our servicers evaluate each residential loan in default to determine the most effective loss mitigation strategy, which may be modification, short sale, or foreclosure, and pursue the alternative most suitable to the consumer and to mitigate losses to the bank.

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential economic impact to our customers, we implemented a short-term program that complies with the CARES Act under which we are providing temporary relief on a case by case basis to borrowers directly impacted by COVID-19 who were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. For commercial borrowers, this relief typically allows for deferrals of principal and/or interest payments for 90 days, which may be extended, again on a case by case basis, for an additional 90 days, for a maximum of 180 days on a cumulative and successive basis. The deferred payments along with interest accrued during the deferral period are due and payable on the maturity date. For residential borrowers, relief typically takes the form of 90 day payment deferrals, with deferred payments due at the end of the 90 day period. At the end of the 90 day deferral period, residential borrowers may either (i) make all payments due, (ii) be granted an additional deferral period or (iii) enter into a modification or repayment plan. We have also temporarily suspended new residential foreclosure actions.

Through April 20, 2020, we have granted temporary deferrals to borrowers as summarized in the table below (in millions):



	Requests Received					Approved
	Count	UPB		% of Portfolio		Count	UPB		% of Portfolio
CRE - Property Type:
Hotel	30	$	505	90	%	30	$	505	90	%
Retail	83	576		43	%	57	372		28	%
Office	15	251		13	%	9	195		10	%
Industrial	8	80		11	%	7	66		9	%
Multifamily	24	209		11	%	20	171		9	%
	160	1,621		24	%	123	1,309		19	%
C&I - Industry
Accommodation and Food Services	11	85		38	%	7	36		16	%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation	6	44		20	%	5	40		18	%
Retail Trade	4	51		15	%	1	7		2	%
Manufacturing	3	30		9	%	2	27		7	%
Other	25	138		<7%		14	74		<4%
	49	348		5	%	29	184		3	%
BFG - Equipment	11	67		10	%	9	66		10	%
BFG - Franchise	146	513		79	%	144	482		74	%
Smaller Balance Commercial Loans	408	320				197	112
Total Commercial	774	$	2,869			502	$	2,153
Residential (excl govt. guaranteed loans)						974	$	499

The substantial majority of these deferrals were not implemented until after March 31, 2020.

Under recently issued inter-agency guidance and consistent with the CARES Act, these deferrals or modifications will generally not be categorized as TDRs. Loans subject to these temporary deferrals or modifications, if in compliance with the contractual terms of the deferral or modification agreements, will typically not be reported as past due or classified as non-accrual during the deferral period.

We have been active participants in the SBA's PPP, established by the CARES Act to help small and medium-sized businesses remain viable through the COVID-19 crisis. We began accepting intake forms on April 3, 2020, launching our digital portal on April 6, 2020. Through May 6, 2020, we had funded almost 3,500 loans totaling $841 million and helped protect nearly 100,000 jobs.

Analysis of the Allowance for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses

The ALLL relates to loans originated or purchased since the FSB acquisition and impairment recognized as a result of decreases in expected cash flows on ACI loans due to further credit deterioration. The determinationACL is management's estimate of the amount of expected credit losses over the ~~ALLL is, by nature, highly complex and subjective. Future events that are inherently uncertain could result in material changes to the level~~life of the ~~ALLL. General economic~~loan portfolio, or the amount of amortized cost basis not expected to be collected, at the balance sheet date. This estimate encompasses information about historical events, current conditions ~~including but not limited to unemployment rates, the level of business investment~~ and ~~growth, real estate values, vacancy rates~~reasonable and rental rates in our primary market areas, the level of interest rates, and a variety of other factors that affect the ability of borrowers’ businesses to generate cash flows sufficient to service their debts will impact the future performance of the portfolio. Adoption of the CECL model in the first quarter of 2020 will result in significant changes to the methodology employed to determinesupportable forecasts. Determining the amount of the ~~ALLL,~~ ACL is complex

and ~~may materially~~requires extensive judgment by management about matters that are inherently uncertain. There is currently a high level of uncertainty around the impact the ~~amount~~COVID-19 crisis will have on the economy broadly, and on our borrowers specifically. In light of this uncertainty, we believe it is possible that the ~~ALLL recorded~~ACL estimate could change, potentially materially, in future periods. Changes in the ~~consolidated~~ACL may result from changes in our economic forecast, changes in loan portfolio composition, and circumstances not currently known to us that may impact the financial ~~statements.~~condition and operations of our borrowers, among other factors.

~~Commercial loans~~

~~The allowance is comprised of specific reserves for loans that are individually evaluated and determined to be impaired as well as general reserves for loans that have not been identified as impaired.~~

Commercial relationships graded substandard or doubtful and on non-accrual status with committed credit facilities greater than or equal to $1.0 million, as well as loans modified in TDRs, are individually evaluated for impairment. Other commercial relationships on non-accrual status with committed balances under $1.0 million may also be evaluated individually for impairment, at management's discretion. For ~~loans evaluated individually for impairment and determined to be impaired, a specific allowance is established based on~~ the ~~present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value~~substantial majority of the loan ~~or the~~portfolio, expected losses are estimated ~~fair value~~using econometric models that employ a factor based methodology to estimate PD and LGD. Projected PDs and LGDs are applied to estimated exposure at default to generate estimates of ~~collateral less costs to sell.~~

We believe that loans rated special mention, substandard or doubtful that are not individually evaluated for impairment exhibit characteristics indicative of a heightened level of credit risk. We apply a quantitativeexpected loss factor for loans rated special mention based on average annual probability of default and implied severity, derived from internal and external data. Loss factors for substandard and doubtful loans that are not individually evaluated are determined by using default frequency and severity information applied at the loan level. ~~Estimated default frequencies~~These loan level estimates are aggregated by portfolio segment and ~~severities are based on available industry and internal data. In addition, we apply~~loan class to generate a ~~floor to these calculated loss factors, based on the loss factor~~collective estimate for groups of loans that share common risk characteristics. Qualitative adjustments may also be applied to ~~the special mention portfolio.~~

~~To the extent,~~incorporate factors that management does not believe have been adequately considered in ~~management's judgment, commercial portfolio segments have sufficient observable loss history,~~ the quantitative ~~portion of the ALLL is based on the Bank's historical net charge-off rates. These commercial segments include owner-occupied commercial real estate~~estimate. For loans ~~commercial and industrial~~that do not share similar risk characteristics with other loans such as collateral dependent loans and TDRs, expected credit losses are estimated on an individual basis. Expected credit losses are estimated over the Bridge portfolios. For commercial portfolio segments that have not yet exhibited an observable loss trend, the quantitative loss factors are based on peer group average annual historical net charge-off rates by loan class and the Company’s internal credit risk rating system. These commercial segments include multifamily, non-owner occupied commercial real estate and construction and land loans. For Pinnacle, quantitative loss factors are based primarily on historical municipal default data. For most commercial portfolio segments, we use a 20 quarter look-back period in the calculation of historical net charge-off rates.

Where applicable, the peer group used to calculate average annual historical net charge-off rates used in estimating general reserves is made up of 25 banks included in the OCC Midsize Bank Group plus five additional banks not included in the OCC Midsize Bank Group that management believes to be comparable based on size, geography and nature of lending operations. Peer bank data is obtained from the Statistics on Depository Institutions Report published by the FDIC for the most recent quarter available. These banks, as a group, are considered by management to be comparable to BankUnited in size, nature of lending operations and loan portfolio composition. We evaluate the composition of the peer group annually, or more frequently if, in our judgment, a more frequent evaluation is necessary. Our internal risk rating system comprises 13 credit grades; grades 1 through 8 are “pass” grades. The risk ratings are driven largely by debt service coverage. Peer group historical loss rates are adjusted upward for loans assigned a lower “pass” rating.

As noted above, we generally use a 20 quarter look-back period to calculate quantitative loss rates. We believe this look-back period to be consistent with the range of industry practice and appropriate to capture a sufficient range of observations reflecting the performance of our loans, which were originated in the current economic cycle. With the exception of the Pinnacle municipal finance portfolio, a four quarter loss emergence period is used in the calculation of general reserves. A twelve quarter loss emergence period is used in the calculation of general reserves for the Pinnacle portfolio.

The primary assumptions underlying estimates of expected cash flows for ACI commercial loans are default probability and severity of loss given default. Assessments of default probability and severity are based on net realizable value analyses prepared at the individual loan level. Based on our analysis, no ALLL related to ACI commercial loans was recorded at March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.

~~Residential and other consumer loans~~

The residential and other consumer loan portfolio has not yet developed an observable loss trend. Therefore, the ALLL for residential loans is based primarily on relevant proxy historical loss rates. The ALLL for 1-4 single family residential loans, excluding government insured residential loans, is estimated using average annual loss rates on prime residential mortgage securitizations issued between 2003 and 2008 as a proxy. Based on the comparability of FICO scores and LTV ratios between loans included in those securitizations and loans in the Bank’s portfolio and the geographic diversity in the new purchased residential portfolio, we determined that prime residential mortgage securitizations provide an appropriate proxy for incurred losses in this portfolio class. A peer group 20-quarter average net charge-off rate is used to estimate the ALLL for the home equity and other consumer loan classes. See further discussion of peer group loss factors above. The home equity and other consumer loan portfolios are not significant components of the overall loan portfolio.

~~Qualitative Factors~~

Qualitative adjustments are made to the ALLL when, based on management’s judgment, there are internal or external factors impacting probable incurred losses not taken into account by the quantitative calculations. Potential qualitative adjustments are categorized as follows:

~~Portfolio performance trends, including trends in and the levels of delinquencies, non-performing loans and classified loans;~~

~~Changes in the nature of the portfolio and terms~~contractual term of the loans, ~~specifically including~~adjusted for expected prepayments.

See Note 1 to the ~~volume~~consolidated financial statements for more detailed information about our ACL methodology and ~~nature of policy and procedural exceptions;~~

~~Portfolio growth trends;~~

~~Changes in lending policies and procedures, including credit and underwriting guidelines and portfolio management practices;~~

~~Economic factors, including unemployment rates and GDP growth rates and other factors considered relevant by management;~~

~~Changes in the value of underlying collateral;~~

~~Quality of risk ratings, as evaluated by our independent credit review function;~~

~~Credit concentrations;~~

~~Changes in and experience levels of credit administration management and staff; and~~

~~Other factors identified by management that may impact the level of losses inherent in the portfolio, including but not limited to competition and legal and regulatory considerations.~~

~~ACI Loans~~

~~For ACI loans, a valuation allowance is established when periodic evaluations of expected cash flows reflect a deterioration resulting from credit~~ related factors from the level of cash flows that were estimated to be collected at acquisition plus any additional expected cash flows arising from revisions in those estimates. We perform a quarterly analysis of expected cash flows for ACI loans.

Expected cash flows for ACI 1-4 single family residential loans are estimated at the pool level. The analysis of expected cash flows incorporates assumptions about expected prepayment rates, default rates, delinquency levels and loss severity given default.

~~No ALLL related to 1-4 single family residential ACI pools was recorded at March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.~~

accounting policies.

The following table provides an analysis of the ~~ALLL,~~ACL, provision for ~~loan~~credit losses and net charge-offs for the periods indicated (in thousands):. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the ACL was estimated using the CECL methodology. For the three months ended March 31,2019, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, an incurred loss methodology was used.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Balance at beginning of period:	$	109,931		$	144,795		$	108,671		$	109,931
Impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13							27,305			—
							135,976			109,931
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses:
1-4 single family residential	178			245			(6,777		)	178
Home equity loans and lines of credit	(5		)	(6		)	10			(5		)
Other consumer loans	(23		)	135			119			(23		)
Multi-family	(1,077		)	1,471			8,842			(1,077		)
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	5,288			49			15,792			5,288
Construction and land	414			137			(8		)	414
Owner occupied commercial real estate	(1,729		)	541			19,358			(1,729		)
Commercial and industrial	7,675			1,650			56,439			7,675
Commercial lending subsidiaries
Pinnacle	(7		)	(43		)	174			(7		)
Bridge - franchise finance	327			124			24,048			327
Bridge - equipment finance	(760		)	(1,156		)	3,868			(760		)
Total Provision	10,281			3,147			121,865			10,281
Charge-offs:
1-4 single family residential	—			(15		)	(31		)	—
Other consumer loans	—			(267		)
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	(1,703		)	(243		)	(552		)	(1,703		)
Owner occupied commercial real estate	(42		)	(3,225		)	(65		)	(42		)
Commercial and industrial⁽¹⁾	(4,388		)	(6,882		)
Commercial and industrial							(2,215		)	(4,388		)
Bridge - franchise finance							(167		)	—
Bridge - equipment finance							(4,776		)	—
Total Charge-offs	(6,133		)	(10,632		)	(7,806		)	(6,133		)
Recoveries:
Home equity loans and lines of credit	2			2			1			2
Other consumer loans	12			18			1			12
Multi-family							2			—
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate							41			—
Owner occupied commercial real estate	323			—			86			323
Commercial and industrial	287			144			413			287
Commercial lending subsidiaries
Bridge - franchise finance	—			2
Total Recoveries	624			166			544			624
Net Charge-offs:	(5,509		)	(10,466		)	(7,262		)	(5,509		)
Balance at end of period	$	114,703		$	137,476		$	250,579		$	114,703


~~(1)~~	~~Includes charge-offs of $5.4 million related to taxi medallion loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~

The following table shows the distribution of the ~~ALLL~~ACL at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018				March 31, 2020				January 1, 2020 ⁽¹⁾				December 31, 2019
	Total		%⁽¹⁾		Total		%⁽¹⁾		Total		%⁽²⁾		Total		%⁽²⁾		Total		%⁽²⁾
Residential and other consumer:
1 - 4 single family residential	$	10,804	22.3	%	$	10,626	22.2	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit	—		—	%	3		—	%
Other consumer loans	148		0.1	%	159		0.1	%
	10,952		22.4	%	10,788		22.3	%
Residential and other consumer loans									12,576		24.4	%	19,252		24.5	%	11,154		24.5	%
Commercial:
Multi-family	6,322		11.4	%	7,399		11.8	%	13,087		8.5	%	4,244		9.6	%	5,024		9.6	%
Non-owner occupied commercial real estate	33,843		21.5	%	30,258		21.4	%	25,078		21.5	%	9,798		21.7	%	23,240		21.7	%
Construction and land	1,792		1.0	%	1,378		1.0	%	2,610		1.0	%	2,618		1.1	%	764		1.1	%
Owner occupied commercial real estate	8,351		9.4	%	9,799		9.7	%	50,685		8.7	%	31,306		8.9	%	8,066		8.9	%
Commercial and industrial	37,890		22.5	%	34,316		21.9	%	106,964		25.3	%	52,327		23.4	%	43,485		23.4	%
Commercial lending subsidiaries
Pinnacle	868		6.5	%	875		6.6	%	585		5.0	%	411		5.2	%	720		5.2	%
Bridge - franchise finance	5,887		2.4	%	5,560		2.4	%	32,910		2.8	%	9,030		2.6	%	9,163		2.6	%
Bridge - equipment finance	8,798		2.9	%	9,558		2.9	%	6,084		2.8	%	6,991		3.0	%	7,055		3.0	%
	103,751		77.6	%	99,143		77.7	%	238,003		75.6	%	116,725		75.5	%	97,517		75.5	%
	$	114,703	100.0	%	$	109,931	100.0	%	$	250,579	100.0	%	$	135,977	100.0	%	$	108,671	100.0	%


(1)	Adoption date of ASU 2016-13.


(2)	Represents percentage of loans receivable in each category to total loans receivable.

The ~~balance~~following chart depicts the changes in the ACL from December 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020 (in millions):

The increase in the ACL from January 1, 2020, the date of initial adoption of ASC 326, to March 31, 2020 was primarily due to changes in our reasonable and supportable forecast, in large part resulting from the ~~ALLL~~emerging COVID-19 pandemic. The Company based its reasonable and supportable economic forecast used in estimating the ACL at March 31, ~~2019 increased $4.8 million from the balance at December 31, 2018. Factors influencing the change~~2020 on Moody's March Mid-Cycle Baseline forecast dated March 27, 2020. This forecast featured a peak-to-trough drop of approximately 20% in real GDP and a national unemployment rate approaching 9% in the ~~ALLL related~~second quarter of 2020, the VIX approaching 60 and year-over-year declines in the S&P 500 index reaching a low of near 30%. The forecast contemplated a recovery beginning in the second half of 2020 with unemployment remaining elevated into 2023. The econometric models we use to ~~specific loan types at~~estimate

expected credit losses ingest a wide array of national, regional and MSA level economic variables and data points. Some of the more impactful include unemployment rates, a market volatility index, a stock price index, real GDP, a variety of interest rates and spreads, HPI, and commercial real estate forecast data.

The ACL for residential and other consumer loans decreased from January 1, 2020 to March ~~31, 2019 as compared to December 31, 2018, include:~~

~~A decrease of $1.1 million for multi-family loans~~31,2020. This decline was primarily attributable to the introduction of a ~~decrease~~qualitative loss factor related to model imprecision. The ACL for residential and other consumer loans included $1.7 million related to PCD loans at March 31, 2020.

Increases in the ~~balance~~ACL for the majority of ~~loans outstanding and a decrease in quantitative and qualitative loss factors.~~

~~An increase of $3.6 million for non-owner occupied~~our commercial ~~real estate loans~~loan portfolio classes was primarily attributable to ~~increases~~changes in ~~certain qualitative loss factors~~the Company's reasonable and supportable economic forecast. The increase also reflected an increase in specific reserves ~~for~~of approximately $16 million summarized as follows:

An increase of $4.3 million in commercial and industrial loans, primarily related to one ~~impaired loan relationship.~~previously identified $35 million Florida loan.

An increase of $15.2 million in the Bridge franchise finance portfolio, related to quick service restaurant concepts.

A decrease of ~~$1.4~~$3.1 million ~~for owner occupied commercial real estate loans was primarily attributable~~in the Bridge equipment finance portfolio.

Changes in the ACL from December 31, 2019 to January 1, 2020 represented the adoption of ASU 2016-13. In general, the change in methodology resulted in increased reserves due to the transition to a ~~decrease in quantitative and qualitative~~lifetime expected loss ~~factors and a decrease~~model from an incurred loss model. However, as noted in the table above, there are certain CRE portfolios where the reserve decreased. This was mainly driven by the use of quantitative models to estimate the ACL at the loan level, specific ~~reserve for one impaired loan relationship.~~

~~An increase~~to the Company's portfolio, under CECL, instead of ~~$3.6 million for other commercial and industrial loans~~the peer group historical losses rates utilized under the prior incurred loss model. Certain qualitative factors were also removed, as their impact was ~~attributable to loan growth, an increase~~captured in the quantitative ~~and qualitative loss factors and increase in specific reserves.~~estimate under CECL.

For additional information about the ~~ALLL,~~ACL, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

Deposits

Average balances and rates paid on deposits were as follows for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,								Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019				2018				2020				2019
	Average Balance		Average Rate Paid		Average Balance		Average Rate Paid		Average Balance		Average Rate Paid		Average Balance		Average Rate Paid
Demand deposits:
Non-interest bearing	3,605,131		—	%	$	3,318,952	—	%	$	4,368,553	—	%	$	3,605,131	—	%
Interest bearing	1,702,479		1.34	%	1,600,009		1.05	%	2,173,628		1.29	%	1,702,479		1.34	%
Money market	11,221,366		1.90	%	10,470,666		1.12	%	10,233,123		1.48	%	11,221,366		1.90	%
Savings	232,614		0.28	%	328,604		0.28	%	179,079		0.19	%	232,614		0.28	%
Time	6,907,011		2.29	%	6,314,137		1.49	%	7,510,070		2.04	%	6,907,011		2.29	%
	$	23,668,601	1.67	%	$	22,032,368	1.04	%	$	24,464,453	1.36	%	$	23,668,601	1.67	%

The following table shows scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit with denominations greater than or equal to $100,000 as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 (in thousands):


Three months or less	$	503,507	$	1,080,408
Over three through six months	779,377		729,787
Over six through twelve months	1,834,843		1,542,955
Over twelve months	580,830		275,485
	$	3,698,557	$	3,628,635

FHLB Advances, Notes and Other Borrowings

In addition to deposits, we utilize FHLB advances ~~to fund growth in interest earning assets;~~as a funding source; the advances provide us with additional flexibility in managing both term and cost of ~~funding.~~funding and in managing interest rate risk. FHLB advances are secured by FHLB stock, qualifying residential first mortgage and commercial real estate ~~and home equity~~ loans, and MBS.

The contractual balance of FHLB advances outstanding at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 is scheduled to mature as follows (in thousands):


Maturing in:
2019—One month or less	$	1,845,000
2019—Over one month	2,431,000
2020	475,000
2020—One month or less			$	1,665,000
2020—Over one month			3,126,000
2021	275,000		250,000
Thereafter			100,000
Total contractual balance outstanding			5,141,000
Cumulative fair value hedging adjustments			3,409
Carrying value	$	5,026,000	$	5,144,409

The table above reflects contractual maturities of outstanding advances, and does not incorporate the impact that interest rate swaps designated as ~~cash flow~~ hedges have on the duration of borrowings. See Note 86 to the consolidated financial statements for more information about derivative instruments.

Outstanding senior notes payable and other borrowings consisted of the following at the dates indicated (in thousands):


	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Senior notes	$	394,562	$	394,390	$	395,270	$	395,090
Finance leases	8,139		8,359		33,309		34,248
	$	402,701	$	402,749	$	428,579	$	429,338

Senior notes have a face amount of $400 million, a fixed coupon rate of 4.875% and mature on November 17, 2025.

~~The Bank utilizes federal funds purchased to manage the daily cash position. At March 31, 2019, the Company had $175 million in federal funds purchased.~~

Capital Resources

Pursuant to the FDIA, the federal banking agencies have adopted regulations setting forth a five-tier system for measuring the capital adequacy of the financial institutions they supervise. At March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, BankUnited and the Company had capital levels that exceeded both the regulatory well-capitalized guidelines and all internal capital ratio targets.

~~Stockholders'~~

The following table provides information regarding regulatory capital for the Company and the Bank as of March 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands):



	Actual				Required to be Considered Well Capitalized				Required to be Considered Adequately Capitalized				Required to be Considered Adequately Capitalized Including Capital Conservation Buffer
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
BankUnited, Inc.:
Tier 1 leverage	$	2,813,226	8.53	%	N/A ⁽¹⁾		N/A⁽¹⁾		$	1,319,509	4.00	%	N/A⁽¹⁾		N/A⁽¹⁾
CET1 risk-based capital	$	2,813,226	11.76	%	$	1,554,389	6.50	%	$	1,076,115	4.50	%	$	1,673,957	7.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	$	2,813,226	11.76	%	$	1,913,094	8.00	%	$	1,434,820	6.00	%	$	2,032,662	8.50	%
Total risk based capital	$	3,013,254	12.60	%	$	2,391,367	10.00	%	$	1,913,094	8.00	%	$	2,510,935	10.50	%
BankUnited:
Tier 1 leverage	$	3,064,047	9.31	%	$	1,645,075	5.00	%	$	1,316,060	4.00	%	N/A		N/A
CET1 risk-based capital	$	3,064,047	12.86	%	$	1,548,966	6.50	%	$	1,072,361	4.50	%	$	1,668,117	7.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital	$	3,064,047	12.86	%	$	1,906,420	8.00	%	$	1,429,815	6.00	%	$	2,025,571	8.50	%
Total risk based capital	$	3,264,075	13.70	%	$	2,383,025	10.00	%	$	1,906,420	8.00	%	$	2,502,176	10.50	%

(1) There is no Tier 1 leverage ratio component in the definition of a well-capitalized bank holding company.

As disclosed in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had elected to phase-in the initial impact of adopting CECL for regulatory capital purposes, allowing CECL's regulatory capital effects to be phased in at 25 percent per year, beginning in the first year of adoption. As part of its response to the impact of COVID-19, our banking regulators issued an inter-agency interim final rule providing the option to temporarily delay the effects of CECL on regulatory capital for two years, followed by a three-year transition period. The Company has elected to adopt the provisions of this interim final rule.

Total stockholders' equity ~~remained relatively flat~~decreased by approximately $465 million at March 31, 2020 compared to December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~repurchase~~most significant reason for this decrease was a decline of ~~common shares and payment of dividends were offset by the retention of earnings.~~ ~~Our dividend payout ratio was 32.4% and 27.0%~~$292 million in accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020, attributed to an increase in unrealized losses on AFS securities and ~~2018, respectively.~~

~~In January 2019~~derivative instruments. See the ~~Board~~section of ~~Directors~~this Management's Discussion and Analysis entitled "Analysis of Financial Condition; Investment Securities" and Note 3 to the ~~Company authorized~~consolidated financial statements for further discussion of unrealized losses on AFS securities. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of its AFS securities. Unrealized losses on derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments were attributable to reductions in benchmark interest rates. Other factors contributing to the decrease in total stockholders equity were the repurchase of ~~up to an additional $150~~common shares, the initial adoption of ASU 2016-13 which impacted retained earnings by $24 million, dividends in ~~shares~~the amount of its outstanding common stock, subject to any applicable regulatory approvals. Any repurchases will be made in accordance with applicable securities laws from time to time in open market or private transactions. The extent to which the Company repurchases shares,$22 million, and the timing of such repurchases, will depend upon a variety of factors, including market conditions, the Company’s capital position, regulatory requirements and other considerations. No time limit was set$31 million net loss for the ~~completion~~quarter.

We believe we are well positioned, from a capital perspective, to withstand a severe downturn in the economy. In light of the ~~share repurchase program,~~COVID-19 crisis, uncertainty around its ultimate impact on the economy and, by extension, on our financial condition and results of operations, we have enhanced our stress testing framework. We have increased both the frequency of stress testing and the ~~program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.~~spectrum of scenarios utilized. One exercise we completed was to stress our March 31, 2020 loan portfolio using both the 2018 DFAST severely adverse scenario and the 2020 DFAST severely adverse scenario. The results of each of these stress tests projected regulatory capital ratios in excess of all well capitalized thresholds.

During the three months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company repurchased approximately ~~1.1~~3.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of ~~approximately $40~~$101 million, at a weighted average price of ~~$35.91~~$30.36 per share. The Company has temporarily suspended its share repurchase program.

We ~~filed a~~have an active shelf registration statement on file with the SEC ~~in October 2018~~ that allows the Company to periodically offer and sell in one or more offerings, individually or in any combination, our common stock, preferred stock and other non-equity securities. The shelf registration provides us with flexibility in issuing capital instruments and enables us to more readily access the capital markets as needed to pursue future growth opportunities and to ensure continued compliance with regulatory capital requirements. Our ability to issue securities pursuant to the shelf registration is subject to market conditions.

~~The following table provides information regarding regulatory capital for~~ We believe, based on recent market issuances by other regional banks and our evaluation of current markets, the Company ~~and~~would be able to successfully access the ~~Bank as of March 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):~~

Actual
Required to be
Considered Well
Capitalized

Required to be
Considered
Adequately
Capitalized
Required to be Considered
Adequately
Capitalized Including Capital Conservation Buffer
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
BankUnited, Inc.:

Tier 1 leverage $ 2,843,097
8.78 %
N/A ⁽¹⁾

N/A⁽¹⁾

$ 1,295,988
4.00 %
N/A⁽¹⁾

N/A⁽¹⁾

CET1 risk-based capital $ 2,843,097
12.27 % $ 1,506,180
6.50 % $ 1,042,740
4.50 % $ 1,622,040
7.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital $ 2,843,097
12.27 % $ 1,853,760
8.00 % $ 1,390,320
6.00 % $ 1,969,620
8.50 %
Total risk based capital $ 2,961,025
12.78 % $ 2,317,201
10.00 % $ 1,853,760
8.00 % $ 2,433,061
10.50 %
BankUnited:

Tier 1 leverage $ 2,986,945
9.24 % $ 1,615,496
5.00 % $ 1,292,397
4.00 % N/A
N/A
CET1 risk-based capital $ 2,986,945
12.94 % $ 1,500,029
6.50 % $ 1,038,482
4.50 % $ 1,615,416
7.00 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital $ 2,986,945
12.94 % $ 1,846,190
8.00 % $ 1,384,642
6.00 % $ 1,961,576
8.50 %
Total risk based capital $ 3,104,873
13.45 % $ 2,307,737
10.00 % $ 1,846,190
8.00 % $ 2,423,124
10.50 %

~~1) There is no Tier 1 leverage ratio component~~capital markets in the ~~definition of a well-capitalized bank holding company.~~current environment.

Beginning January 1, 2019, the Bank and the Company are required to maintain a capital conservation buffer composed of CET1 capital equal to 2.50% of risk-weighted assets above the amounts required to be adequately capitalized in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers.

Liquidity

Liquidity involves our ability to generate adequate funds to support planned interest earning asset growth, meet deposit withdrawal and credit line usage requests, maintain reserve requirements, conduct routine operations, pay dividends, service outstanding debt and meet other contractual obligations.

BankUnited's ongoing liquidity needs have been and continue to be met primarily by cash flows from operations, deposit growth, the investment portfolio and FHLB advances.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to dislocation and volatility in funding and capital markets and evoked widespread concerns about the ongoing functioning of those markets, the availability of liquidity and the economy generally. In response, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate to a target level of 0 - 0.25%, actively adjusted the size of its overnight and term repurchase agreement operations, reduced reserve requirements and the cost of discount window borrowings, encouraged banks to utilize the discount window and committed to purchasing large amounts of U.S. Treasury securities and MBS. The U.S. government has announced an unprecedented variety of additional stimulus and measures to support markets, the flow of credit, and systemic liquidity. These include the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility, the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, the Municipal Liquidity Facility, the Main Street New Loan Facility, the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility, Paycheck Protection Program loans, the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility (PPPLF), the Commercial Paper Funding Facility, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, and the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility. These actions appear to have been effective in stabilizing market liquidity.

In response to the onset of COVID-19 and potential concerns that might arise about the stability of liquidity, we took a number of precautionary measures to ensure adequacy of liquidity. We activated our liquidity contingency funding plan, which called for the implementation of a number of measures to increase the frequency and extent of monitoring and reporting of intraday liquidity, deposit flows and other liquidity trends as well as testing of all of our contingent liquidity sources. We took steps to optimize available same day liquidity. We increased the level of cash held on balance sheet, to be prepared to meet potential increased demand for deposit withdrawals and line usage, which to date have not materialized. We optimized same day available liquidity by pledging additional securities and loans to the FHLB and the discount window to support those sources of contingent liquidity.

At March 31, 2020, same day available liquidity totaled approximately $8.5 billion, including cash, borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the Federal Reserve Discount Window and Federal Funds lines of credit, as depicted in the following chart:

Additional sources of liquidity include cash flows from operations, wholesale deposits, and cash flow from the Bank's amortizing securities and loan portfolios. In the near-term, cash flows from the loan portfolio may be reduced as a result of temporary payment deferrals granted to borrowers. We do not expect this to materially impact our liquidity position. Management also has the ability to exert substantial control over the rate and timing of loan production, and resultant requirements for liquidity to fund new loans. We currently expect the majority of loan production, at least for the remainder of the second quarter, to be related to loans originated under the PPP and potentially the Main Street Lending Facility. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have not experienced unusual deposit outflows or volatility. Credit line usage, which we have monitored daily since the onset of COVID-19, has deviated very little from our trailing three year average. PPP loans will be a near-term demand on liquidity; it is currently our intention to match fund these loans using the PPPLF, which we have successfully accessed. Our available liquidity may also be reduced as the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank reprice our

collateral in the normal course of business based on March 31, 2020 valuations. Based on our initial analysis, we do not expect the impact to be material to our overall liquidity position.

For the three months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$88.5~~$63.5 million and ~~$138.1~~$88.5 million, respectively. When compared with the three months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, operating cash flows were negatively impacted by approximately ~~$64.5~~$65 million as a result of the daily ~~cash~~ settlement of derivative positions. These settlements, which are reported in cash flows from operating activities, are directly affected by changes in market interest rates. Accretion on ACI loans, which is reflected as a non-cash reduction in net income to arrive at operating cash flows, totaled $16.4 million and $82.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Accretable yield on ACI loans represents the excess of expected future cash flows over the carrying amount of the loans, and is recognized as interest income over the expected lives of the loans. Amounts recorded as accretion are realized in cash as individual loans are paid down or otherwise resolved; however, the timing of cash realization may differ from the timing of income recognition. These cash flows from the repayment of ACI loans, inclusive of amounts that have been accreted through earnings over time, are recognized as cash flows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows upon receipt.

BankUnited has access to additional liquidity through FHLB advances, other collateralized borrowings, wholesale deposits or the sale of available for sale securities. At March 31, 2019, unencumbered investment securities totaled $6.1 billion. At March 31, 2019, BankUnited had available borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $3.4 billion, unused borrowing capacity at the FRB of $487 million and unused Federal funds lines of credit totaling $85 million. Management also has the ability to exert substantial control over the rate and timing of growth of the loan portfolio, and resultant requirements for liquidity to fund loans.

~~Continued growth of deposits and loans are the most significant trends expected to impact the Bank’s liquidity in the near term.~~

The ALCO policy has established several measures of liquidity which are typically monitored monthly by the ALCO and quarterly by the Board of Directors. ~~One~~In light of the COVID-19 situation, most of these measures, in addition to same day available liquidity and information about deposit flows, are currently being monitored and reported to executive management daily and to the Board of Directors weekly. The ALCO policy establishes limits for the ratio of available liquidity to volatile liabilities, the ratio of wholesale funding to total assets, the ratio of brokered deposits to total deposits and a government backed securities holding ratio, measured as the ratio of U.S. Government backed securities to total securities. At March 31, 2020 BankUnited was in compliance with all of these ALCO policy limits.

An additional primary measure of liquidity monitored by management is the ~~30 day~~30-day total liquidity ratio, defined as (a) the sum of cash and cash equivalents, pledgeable securities and a measure of funds expected to be generated by operations over the next 30 days; divided by (b) the sum of potential deposit runoff, liabilities maturing within the 30 day time frame and a measure of funds expected to be used in operations over the next 30 days. ALCO policy thresholds stipulate that BankUnited’s liquidity is considered acceptable if the ~~30 day~~30-day total liquidity ratio exceeds 100%. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, BankUnited’s ~~30 day~~30-day total liquidity ratio was ~~196%~~141%. Management also monitors a ~~one year~~one-year liquidity ratio, defined as (a) cash and cash equivalents, pledgeable securities, unused borrowing capacity at the FHLB, and loans and non-agency securities maturing within one year; divided by (b) forecasted deposit outflows and borrowings maturing within one year. This ratio allows management to monitor liquidity over a longer time horizon. The acceptable threshold established by the ALCO for this liquidity measure is 100%. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, BankUnited’s ~~one year~~one-year liquidity ratio was ~~148%~~145%. Additional measures of liquidity regularly monitored by the ALCO include the ratio of ~~wholesale funding to total assets, a measure of available liquidity to volatile liabilities, the ratio of brokered deposits to total deposits, the ratio of~~ FHLB advances to total funding, ~~the percentage of investment securities backed by the U.S. government and government agencies and~~ concentrations of large ~~deposits. At March 31, 2019, BankUnited was within acceptable limits established by~~deposits, a measure of on balance sheet available liquidity and the ~~ALCO~~ratio of non-interest bearing deposits to total deposits, which is reflective of the quality and cost, rather than the quantity, of available liquidity. The Company also has a comprehensive contingency liquidity funding plan and conducts a quarterly liquidity stress test, the results of which are reported to the risk committee of the Board of ~~Directors for each of these measures.~~Directors.

As a holding company, BankUnited, Inc. is a corporation separate and apart from its banking subsidiary, and therefore, provides for its own liquidity. BankUnited, Inc.’s main sources of funds include management fees and dividends from the Bank, access to capital markets and, to a lesser extent, its own ~~available for sale~~ securities portfolio. There are regulatory limitations that may affect the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to BankUnited, Inc. Management believes that such limitations will not impact our ability to meet our ongoing near-term cash obligations.

We expect that our liquidity requirements will continue to be satisfied over the next 12 months through the sources of funds described above.

Interest Rate Risk

~~The~~A principal component of the Company’s risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments, or market risk, is interest rate risk, including the risk that assets and liabilities with similar re-pricing characteristics may not reprice at the same time or to the same degree. A primary objective of the Company’s asset/liability management activities is to maximize net interest income, while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate risk. The ALCO

is responsible for establishing policies to limit exposure to interest rate risk, and to ensure procedures are established to monitor compliance with these policies. The ~~guidelines~~thresholds established by the ALCO are approved at least annually by the Board of ~~Directors.~~Directors or its Risk Committee.

Management believes that the simulation of net interest income in different interest rate environments provides the most meaningful measure of interest rate risk. Income simulation analysis is designed to capture not only the potential of all assets and liabilities to mature or reprice, but also the probability that they will do so. Income simulation also attends to the relative interest rate sensitivities of these items, and projects their behavior over an extended period of time. Finally, income simulation permits management to assess the probable effects on the balance sheet not only of changes in interest rates, but also of proposed strategies for responding to them.

The income simulation model analyzes interest rate sensitivity by projecting net interest income over twelve and twenty-four month periods in a most likely rate scenario based on consensus forward interest rate curves versus net interest income in alternative rate scenarios. Simulations are generated based on both static and dynamic balance sheet assumptions. Management continually reviews and refines its interest rate risk management process in response to changes in the interest rate environment

and economic climate. Currently, our model projects instantaneous rate shocks of ~~down 200,~~ down 100, plus 100, plus 200, plus 300 and plus 400 basis point shifts as well as ~~flattening and inverted~~a variety of yield curve slope scenarios. We continually evaluate the scenarios being modeled with a view toward adapting them to changing economic conditions, expectations and trends.

The Company’s ALCO policy provides that net interest income sensitivity will be considered acceptable if decreases in forecast net interest income ~~based on a dynamic forecasted balance sheet,~~ in specified parallel rate shock scenarios are within specified percentages of forecast net interest income in the most likely rate scenario over the next twelve months and in the second year. At March 31, 2020, the most likely rate scenario assumes that all indices are floored at 0%. The following table illustrates the ~~acceptable limits as defined by~~thresholds set forth in the ALCO policy and the impact on forecasted net interest income in the indicated simulated scenarios at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


	Down 200		Down 100		Plus 100		Plus 200		Plus 300		Plus 400		Down 100		Plus 100		Plus 200		Plus 300		Plus 400
Policy Limits:
Policy Thresholds:
In year 1	(10.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(10.0	)%	(14.0	)%	(18.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(6.0	)%	(10.0	)%	(14.0	)%	(18.0	)%
In year 2	(13.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(13.0	)%	(17.0	)%	(21.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(13.0	)%	(17.0	)%	(21.0	)%
Model Results at March 31, 2019 - increase (decrease):
Model Results at March 31, 2020 - increase (decrease):
In year 1	(4.0	)%	(1.3	)%	0.9	%	(0.7	)%	(4.0	)%	(7.9	)%	(2.4	)%	0.2	%	(0.8	)%	(2.5	)%	(4.7	)%
In year 2	(9.9	)%	(3.6	)%	3.3	%	3.5	%	2.0	%	(0.4	)%	(3.8	)%	2.7	%	3.7	%	3.5	%	2.9	%
Model Results at December 31, 2018 - increase (decrease):
Model Results at December 31, 2019 - increase (decrease):
In year 1	(4.3	)%	(0.8	)%	0.3	%	(0.9	)%	(2.4	)%	(5.6	)%	(1.1	)%	1.0	%	0.1	%	(2.1	)%	(5.1	)%
In year 2	(9.7	)%	(3.0	)%	3.6	%	4.4	%	4.0	%	3.1	%	(4.8	)%	4.6	%	7.2	%	8.7	%	9.4	%

Management also simulates changes in EVE in various interest rate environments. The ALCO policy has established parameters of acceptable risk that are defined in terms of the percentage change in EVE from a base scenario under eight rate scenarios, derived by implementing immediate parallel movements of plus and down 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points from current rates. We did not simulate decreases in interest rates greater than ~~200~~100 basis points at March 31, ~~2019 or December 31, 2018~~2020 due to the ~~relatively~~currently low level of market interest rates. The following table illustrates the acceptable ~~limits~~thresholds as established by ALCO and the modeled change in EVE in the indicated scenarios at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

Down 200 Down 100 Plus 100 Plus 200 Plus 300 Plus 400
Policy Limits (18.0 )% (9.0 )% (9.0 )% (18.0 )% (27.0 )% (36.0 )%
Model Results at March 31, 2019 - increase (decrease): (2.6 )% 1.3 % (2.3 )% (6.3 )% (10.9 )% (15.6 )%
Model Results at December 31, 2018 - increase (decrease): 0.6 % 2.5 % (3.1 )% (7.5 )% (12.4 )% (17.3 )%



	Down 100		Plus 100		Plus 200		Plus 300		Plus 400
Policy Thresholds	(9.0	)%	(9.0	)%	(18.0	)%	(27.0	)%	(36.0	)%
Model Results at March 31, 2020 - increase (decrease):	(5.6	)%	(0.5	)%	(4.0	)%	(8.2	)%	(12.6	)%
Model Results at December 31, 2019 - increase (decrease):	(1.5	)%	(0.7	)%	(3.1	)%	(6.2	)%	(9.7	)%

These measures fall within an acceptable level of interest rate risk per the ~~policies~~thresholds established byin the ALCO and the Board of Directors. In the event the models indicate an unacceptable level of risk, the Company could undertake a number of actions that would reduce this risk, including the sale or re-positioning of a portion of its investment portfolio, restructuring of borrowings, or the use of derivatives.policy.

Many assumptions were used by the Company to calculate the impact of changes in interest rates, including the change in rates. Actual results may not be similar to the Company’s projections due to several factors including the timing and frequency

of rate changes, market conditions, changes in depositor behavior and loan prepayment speeds and the shape of the yield curve. Actual results may also differ due to the Company’s actions, if any, in response to changing rates and conditions.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow or fair value hedging instruments are one of the tools we use to manage interest rate risk. These derivative instruments are used to mitigate exposure to changes in interest ~~rates~~cash flows on variable rate borrowings ~~such~~and to changes in the fair value of fixed rate borrowings, in each case caused by fluctuations in benchmark interest rates, as ~~FHLB advances and~~well as to manage duration of liabilities. ~~These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedging instruments.~~ The fair value of ~~these~~derivative instruments designated as hedges is included in other assets and other liabilities in our consolidated balance ~~sheets and changes~~sheets. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges are recognized in earnings, as is the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, outstanding interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges had an aggregate notional amount of ~~$2.7 billion.~~$3.1 billion and outstanding interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges had an aggregate notional amount of $250 million. The aggregate fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges included in other ~~assets~~liabilities was ~~$1.4~~$6.7 million.

Interest rate swaps and caps not designated as ~~cash flow~~ hedges had an aggregate notional amount of ~~$2.3~~$3.0 billion at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. The aggregate fair value of these interest rate swaps and caps included in other assets was ~~$25.5~~$135.7 million and the aggregate fair

value included in other liabilities was ~~$16.7~~$42.3 million. These interest rate swaps and caps were entered into as accommodations to certain of our commercial borrowers. To mitigate interest rate risk associated with these derivatives, the Company enters into offsetting derivative positions with primary dealers.

See Note 86 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about derivative financial instruments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For more information on contractual obligations and commitments, see Note 1210 to the consolidated financial statements, the Borrowings section of this MD&A and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in the MD&A of the Company's ~~2018~~2019 Annual ~~Report on Form 10-K.~~

~~Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates~~

~~The Company has made no significant changes in its critical accounting policies and significant estimates from those disclosed in the 2018 Annual Report~~report on Form 10-K.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

~~Tangible book value per common share~~Pre-tax, pre-provision income is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes this measure is relevant to understanding the ~~capital position and~~ performance of the ~~Company. Disclosure~~Company attributable to elements other than the provision for credit losses, particularly in view of ~~this non-GAAP financial~~the adoption of the CECL accounting methodology in the current quarter, which may impact comparability of operating results to prior periods. This measure also provides a meaningful ~~base~~basis for ~~comparability~~comparison to other financial institutions. The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measurement of ~~tangible book value per common share~~pre-tax, pre-provision income to the comparable GAAP financial measurement of ~~book value per common share at~~income (loss) before income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (in ~~thousands except share and per share data)~~thousands):

Total stockholders' equity $ 2,923,390
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets 77,707
Tangible stockholders’ equity $ 2,845,683

Common shares issued and outstanding 98,404,303

Book value per common share $ 29.71

Tangible book value per common share $ 28.92



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Income (loss) before income taxes (GAAP)	$	(40,422	)	$	90,185
Plus: Provision for credit losses	125,428			10,281
Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP)	$	85,006		$	100,466

~~Non-loss share diluted earnings per share~~Recurring operating expenses is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes disclosure of this measure provides readers with information that may be useful in ~~understanding the impact~~comparing current period results to prior periods and in interpreting trends in operational costs, particularly in light of ~~the covered loans and FDIC indemnification asset on the Company’s earnings for periods prior to the termination of the Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.~~our BankUnited 2.0 initiative. The following table reconciles ~~this~~the non-GAAP financial measurement of recurring operating expenses to the comparable GAAP financial measurement of ~~diluted earnings per common share~~total non-interest expense for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2020 and 2019 (in ~~millions except share and per share data, shares in~~ thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net Income (GAAP) $ 85.2
Less Loss Share Contribution (25.8 )
Net Income as reported, minus Loss Share Contribution $ 59.4
Diluted earnings per common share, excluding Loss Share Contribution:
Diluted earnings per common share (GAAP) $ 0.77
Less: Net impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP) (0.23 )
Non-loss share diluted earnings per common share (non-GAAP) $ 0.54
Non-loss share diluted earnings per share:
Loss Share Contribution $ 25.8
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share (GAAP) 105,934
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP) 0.24
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution:
Loss Share Contribution, net of tax, allocated to participating securities (1.0 )
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share (GAAP) 105,934
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution allocated to participating securities (non-GAAP) (0.01 )
Net impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP) $ 0.23

~~Supplemental Calculations~~

~~Calculation of Loss Share Contribution and Non-Loss Share Earnings Per Share~~

Non-Loss Share Earnings are calculated by removing the total Loss Share Contribution from Net Income. The Loss Share Contribution is a hypothetical presentation of the impact of the covered loans and FDIC indemnification asset on earnings for each respective quarter, reflecting the excess of Loss Share Earnings over hypothetical interest income that could have been earned on alternative assets (in millions except share and per share data):

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net Income As Reported $ 85.2
Calculation of Loss Share Contribution:
Interest Income - Covered Loans (Accretion) $ 81.3
Amortization of FDIC Indemnification Asset (40.3 )
Loss Share Earnings 41.0
Hypothetical interest income on alternate assets ⁽¹⁾
(5.9 )
Loss Share Contribution, pre-tax 35.1
Income taxes ⁽²⁾
(9.3 )
Loss Share Contribution, after tax $ 25.8

Net Income as reported, minus Loss Share Contribution $ 59.4

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share, as Reported $ 0.77
Earnings Per Share, Loss Share Contribution 0.23
Non-Loss Share Diluted Earnings Per Share $ 0.54


~~(1)~~	~~See section entitled "Supplemental Calculations - Calculation of Hypothetical Interest Income on Alternate Assets" below for calculation of these amounts and underlying assumptions.~~

~~(2) An assumed marginal tax rate of 26.5% was applied.~~

~~Calculation of Hypothetical Interest Income on Alternate Assets~~

The hypothetical interest income calculated below reflects the estimated income that may have been earned if the average balance of covered loans and the FDIC indemnification asset were liquidated and the proceeds assumed to be invested in securities at the weighted average yield on the Company’s investment securities portfolio as reported. Historically, cash received from the repayment, sale, or other resolution of covered loans and cash payments received from the FDIC under the terms of the Shared Loss Agreement have generally been reinvested in non-covered loans or investment securities. There is no assurance that the hypothetical results illustrated below would have been achieved if the covered loans and FDIC indemnification asset had been liquidated and proceeds reinvested (dollars in millions):

Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Average Balances ⁽¹⁾

Average Covered Loans $ 499
Average FDIC Indemnification Asset 278
Average Loss Share Asset $ 777
Yield
Yield on securities - reported ⁽²⁾
3.04 %
Hypothetical interest income on alternate assets $ 5.9


~~(1)~~	~~Calculated as the simple average of beginning and ending balances reported for each period.~~

~~(2) The weighted average yield on the Company’s investment securities as reported for the applicable quarter.~~



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Total non-interest expense (GAAP)	$	118,868		$	126,690
Less:
Depreciation of operating lease equipment	(12,603		)	(11,812		)
Costs incurred directly related to implementation of BankUnited 2.0	(79		)	(5,892		)
Recurring operating expenses (non-GAAP)	$	106,186		$	108,986

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See the section entitled “Interest Rate Risk” included in Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Effective January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13. The Company designed new controls and modified existing controls as part of its adoption. These additional internal controls over financial reporting included controls over model governance, assumptions, the determination of a reasonable and supportable economic forecast, and expanded controls over loan level data.

During the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting, other than those discussed above, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. We have focused on insuring that our technology systems and internal controls continue to operate effectively in a remote work environment and have not identified any instances in which controls have failed to operate effectively. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 situation on our internal controls to address impacts to their design, implementation and operating effectiveness.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, based upon currently available information and the advice of legal counsel, the likelihood is remote that the impact of these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We received a subpoena from the United States Department of Justice in October 2019 requesting documentation related to the taxi medallion line of business formerly conducted by the Bank. We are cooperating with this investigation.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused substantial disruption to the global economy which has adversely affected, and is expected to continue to adversely affect, the Company’s business and results of operations. The future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy and the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remains uncertain.

This macroeconomic environment has had, and could continue to have, an adverse effect on the Company’s business and operations. Should current economic impacts persist or continue to deteriorate, this macroeconomic environment could have a continued adverse effect on our business and operations, including, but not limited to, decreased demand for the Company’s products and services, protracted periods of lower interest rates, loss of income resulting from forbearances, deferrals and fee waivers provided by the Company to its consumer and commercial borrowers, increased credit losses due to deterioration in the financial condition of our consumer and commercial borrowers, including declining asset and collateral values, which may continue to increase our provision for credit losses and net charge-offs and possible constraints on liquidity and capital, whether due to increases in risk-weighted assets related to supporting client activities or to regulatory actions. The business operations of the Company may also be disrupted if significant portions of its workforce or those of vendors or third-party service providers are unable to work effectively, including because of illness, quarantines, government actions, restrictions in connection with the pandemic, and technology limitations and/or disruptions. The Company also faces an increased risk of litigation and governmental and regulatory scrutiny as a result of the effects of the pandemic on market and economic conditions and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to those conditions.

The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition, as well as its regulatory capital and liquidity ratios, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic. Moreover, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may heighten many of the other risks described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K including, but not limited to, financial market conditions, economic conditions, credit risk, interest rate risk, risk of security breaches and technology changes.

There have been no material changes in the other risk factors disclosed by the Company in its ~~2018~~2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February ~~27, 2019.~~28, 2020.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
Total number of shares purchased⁽¹⁾
Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs⁽²⁾
January 1 – January 31, 2019 —
$ —
—
$ 150,000,000
February 1 – February 28, 2019 689,733
36.06
689,733
$ 125,125,601
March 1 – March 31, 2019 423,352
35.67
423,352
$ 110,025,642
Total 1,113,085
$ 35.91
1,113,085



	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period	Total number of shares purchased⁽¹⁾	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs⁽²⁾
January 1 - January 31, 2020	418,852	$	34.07	418,852	$	131,697,572
February 1 - February 29, 2020	1,312,616	32.47		1,312,616	$	89,070,779
March 1 - March 31, 2020	1,594,109	27.65		1,594,109	$	44,997,312
Total	3,325,577	$	30.36	3,325,577


(1)	The total number of shares purchased during the periods indicated includes shares purchased as part of a publicly announced program.

(2)

On ~~January 22,~~September 12, 2019, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to $150 million of its outstanding common stock. No time limit was set for the completion of the share repurchase program. The authorization does not require the Company to acquire any specified number of common shares and may be commenced, suspended or discontinued without prior notice. Under this authorization, ~~$110,025,642~~$44,997,312 remained available for purchase at March 31, ~~2019.~~2020. On March 13, 2020, we announced the temporary suspension of the share repurchase program in light of the challenges presented by COVID-19 and surrounding events.

Item 6.

Exhibits



Exhibit Number	Description	Location

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

101.INS	The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	Filed herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	Filed herewith

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized this ~~7th~~8th day of May ~~2019.~~2020.



	/s/ Rajinder P. Singh
	Rajinder P. Singh
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


	/s/ Leslie N. Lunak
	Leslie N. Lunak
	Chief Financial Officer

6973



		Page

	Glossary of Defined Terms	ii

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Consolidated Statements of Income	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3935

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6769

ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	6770

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	6770

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	6770

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6771

ITEM 6.	Exhibits	6872

SIGNATURES		6973



	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Residential	$	185,886	$	190,223
Commercial	17,781		17,925
	$	203,667	$	208,148



Balance at December 31, 2017	$	455,059
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference, net	128,499
Accretion	(369,915		)
Other changes, net ⁽¹⁾	78,204
Balance at December 31, 2018	291,847
Reclassifications from non-accretable difference, net	3,440
Accretion	(16,415		)
Balance at March 31, 2019	$	278,872



	March 31, 2019
	FICO
LTV	720 or less		721 - 740		741 - 760		761 or greater		Total
60% or less	$	105,240	$	125,817	$	192,383	$	799,247	$	1,222,687
60% - 70%	124,602		109,812		171,155		607,402		1,012,971
70% - 80%	165,318		206,489		381,236		1,288,028		2,041,071
More than 80%	19,016		36,464		43,214		146,150		244,844
	$	414,176	$	478,582	$	787,988	$	2,840,827	$	4,521,573



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Transaction Income (Loss)			Net Loss on FDIC Indemnification			Net Impact on Pre-tax Earnings
Provision for losses on covered loans	$	(273	)	$	218		$	(55	)
Income from resolution of covered assets, net	3,317			(2,658		)	659
Gain on sale of covered loans	1,703			(1,358		)	345
Loss on covered OREO	(293		)	183			(110		)
	$	4,454		$	(3,615	)	$	839



	March 31, 2019
ROU assets:
Operating leases	$	90,908
Finance leases	7,002
	$	97,910
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases	$	99,743
Finance leases	9,145
	$	108,888



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Operating lease cost	$	5,034

Finance lease cost:
Amortization of ROU assets	$	350
Interest on lease liabilities	255
Total finance lease cost	$	605



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from finance leases	$	255
Operating cash flows from operating leases	5,143
Financing cash flows from finance leases	735
	$	6,133

Lease liabilities recognized from obtaining ROU assets:
Operating lease liabilities recognized upon adoption of ASC 842	$	104,064
Finance leases	1,521
	$	105,585



Years ending December 31:
2019	$	21,207
2020	17,629
2021	15,858
2022	12,114
2023	10,311
Thereafter through 2034	42,984
	$	120,103



Total minimum lease payments to be received	$	811,463
Estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased assets	8,263
Gross investment in direct or sales type financing leases	819,726
Unearned income	(81,564		)
Initial direct costs	4,897
	$	743,059



Years Ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the three months ending March 31, 2019)	$	162,123
2020	176,848
2021	116,382
2022	76,074
2023	60,753
Thereafter	219,283
	$	811,463



Years Ending December 31:
2019 (excluding the three months ending March 31, 2019)	$	50,346
2020	61,981
2021	52,537
2022	45,489
2023	37,121
Thereafter through 2033	101,645
	$	349,119



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2019		Location of Lease Income on Consolidated Statements of Income
Operating leases	$	17,186	Non-interest income from lease financing
Direct or sales type finance leases	5,311		Interest income on loans
Total lease income	$	22,497



	Fair Value at		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
	March 31, 2019		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Investment grade	$	14,042	Discounted cash flow	Voluntary prepayment rate	5.00% - 27.20% (16.10%)
				Probability of default	0.10% - 10.00% (2.09%)
				Loss severity	15.00% - 100.00% (41.53%)
				Discount rate	2.96% - 6.32% (3.86%)

Non-investment grade	$	13,862	Discounted cash flow	Voluntary prepayment rate	4.00% - 30.00% (15.50%)
				Probability of default	0.00% - 10.00% (2.59%)
				Loss severity	15.00% - 100.00% (30.03%)
				Discount rate	2.21% - 13.79% (5.04%)



	March 31, 2018								Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Losses from Fair Value Changes
OREO and repossessed assets	$	—	$	1,674	$	432	$	2,106	$	(1,405	)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	12,522	$	74,895	$	87,417	$	(3,755	)



	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Balance		Percent of Total		Balance		Percent of Total
Pass	$	16,998,822	98.2	%	$	16,728,534	98.2	%
Special mention	75,883		0.4	%	81,070		0.5	%
Substandard	229,170		1.3	%	210,026		1.2	%
Doubtful	9,255		0.1	%	8,389		0.1	%
	$	17,313,130	100.0	%	$	17,028,019	100.0	%



Total stockholders' equity	$	2,923,390
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets	77,707
Tangible stockholders’ equity	$	2,845,683

Common shares issued and outstanding	98,404,303

Book value per common share	$	29.71

Tangible book value per common share	$	28.92



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net Income (GAAP)	$	85.2
Less Loss Share Contribution	(25.8		)
Net Income as reported, minus Loss Share Contribution	$	59.4
Diluted earnings per common share, excluding Loss Share Contribution:
Diluted earnings per common share (GAAP)	$	0.77
Less: Net impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP)	(0.23		)
Non-loss share diluted earnings per common share (non-GAAP)	$	0.54
Non-loss share diluted earnings per share:
Loss Share Contribution	$	25.8
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share (GAAP)	105,934
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP)	0.24
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution:
Loss Share Contribution, net of tax, allocated to participating securities	(1.0		)
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per common share (GAAP)	105,934
Impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution allocated to participating securities (non-GAAP)	(0.01		)
Net impact on diluted earnings per common share of Loss Share Contribution (non-GAAP)	$	0.23



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net Income As Reported	$	85.2
Calculation of Loss Share Contribution:
Interest Income - Covered Loans (Accretion)	$	81.3
Amortization of FDIC Indemnification Asset	(40.3		)
Loss Share Earnings	41.0
Hypothetical interest income on alternate assets ⁽¹⁾	(5.9		)
Loss Share Contribution, pre-tax	35.1
Income taxes ⁽²⁾	(9.3		)
Loss Share Contribution, after tax	$	25.8

Net Income as reported, minus Loss Share Contribution	$	59.4

Diluted Earnings Per Common Share, as Reported	$	0.77
Earnings Per Share, Loss Share Contribution	0.23
Non-Loss Share Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.54



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Average Balances ⁽¹⁾
Average Covered Loans	$	499
Average FDIC Indemnification Asset	278
Average Loss Share Asset	$	777
Yield
Yield on securities - reported ⁽²⁾	3.04		%
Hypothetical interest income on alternate assets	$	5.9