Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10‑Q

FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017
Or

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2016

Or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number 001‑35901

001-35901

FTD Companies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

32‑0255852

Delaware

32-0255852
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3113 Woodcreek Drive, Downers Grove, Illinois
(Address of principal executive offices)

60515
(Zip Code)

(630) 719‑7800

719-7800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S‑TS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non‑acceleratednon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b‑212b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer  ☒

Non‑accelerated filer ☐

Smaller reporting company ☐

Non-accelerated filer

(Do☐ (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)

Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑212b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐  No ☒

There were 27,221,55527,544,951 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding at November 1, 2016.

August 4, 2017.



Table of Contents


FTD COMPANIES, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10‑Q

10-Q

Page

Page

25 

38 

39 

40 

40 

40 

41 

41 

42 

In this document, references to “FTD Companies,” “FTD,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to FTD Companies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.

2


Table of Contents

Forward‑Looking

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) contains certain forward‑lookingforward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our operations, industry, financial condition, performance, results of operations, and liquidity. Statements containing words such as “may,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “projections,” “business outlook,” “estimate,” or similar expressions constitute forward‑lookingforward-looking statements. These forward‑lookingforward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our strategies; statements regarding expected synergies and benefits of our acquisition of Provide Commerce, Inc.; expectations about future business plans, prospective performance and opportunities, including potential acquisitions; future financial performance; revenues; segment metrics; operating expenses; market trends, including those in the markets in which we compete; liquidity; cash flows and uses of cash; dividends; capital expenditures; depreciation and amortization; tax payments; foreign currency exchange rates; hedging arrangements; our ability to repay indebtedness and invest in initiatives; our products and services; pricing; marketing plans; competition; settlement of legal matters; and the impact of accounting changes and other pronouncements. Potential factors that could affect such forward‑lookingforward-looking statements include, among others, the factors disclosed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as updated from time to time in our subsequent filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward‑lookingforward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. Any such forward‑lookingSuch forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual performance and results to differ materially from those predicted. Reported results should not be considered an indication of future performance. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision to these forward‑lookingforward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

3



Table of Contents


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FTD COMPANIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

    

December 31,

 

    

2016

    

2015

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

16,192

 

$

57,892

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $6,929 and $4,802 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively

 

 

26,696

 

 

28,177

Inventories

 

 

27,517

 

 

25,611

Income taxes receivable

 

 

2,843

 

 

5,450

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

10,662

 

 

15,767

Total current assets

 

 

83,910

 

 

132,897

Property and equipment, net

 

 

58,078

 

 

64,753

Intangible assets, net

 

 

289,727

 

 

340,559

Goodwill

 

 

551,208

 

 

561,656

Other assets

 

 

22,197

 

 

21,863

Total assets

 

$

1,005,120

 

$

1,121,728

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

40,444

 

$

82,448

Accrued liabilities

 

 

30,632

 

 

54,087

Accrued compensation

 

 

13,763

 

 

21,193

Deferred revenue

 

 

6,305

 

 

5,421

Income taxes payable

 

 

875

 

 

840

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

20,000

 

 

20,000

Total current liabilities

 

 

112,019

 

 

183,989

Long-term debt

 

 

260,966

 

 

274,946

Deferred tax liabilities, net

 

 

97,489

 

 

112,769

Other liabilities

 

 

6,490

 

 

8,798

Total liabilities

 

 

476,964

 

 

580,502

Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001, authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Common stock, 60,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001, authorized; 29,652,452 and 29,427,365 shares issued at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively

 

 

3

 

 

3

Treasury stock, 2,280,897 and 1,830,897 shares at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively

 

 

(62,035)

 

 

(50,000)

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

687,576

 

 

678,558

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(47,898)

 

 

(52,119)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(49,490)

 

 

(35,216)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

528,156

 

 

541,226

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,005,120

 

$

1,121,728

  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS    
Current assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents $79,356
 $81,002
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $4,552 and $4,962 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively 22,211
 26,659
Inventories 24,867
 24,996
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 9,496
 13,697
Total current assets 135,930
 146,354
Property and equipment, net 53,227
 57,559
Intangible assets, net 267,092
 272,798
Goodwill 467,522
 463,465
Other assets 21,726
 22,138
Total assets $945,497
 $962,314
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY    
Current liabilities:    
Accounts payable $41,885
 $70,254
Accrued liabilities 68,650
 68,274
Accrued compensation 12,598
 19,165
Deferred revenue 6,141
 4,911
Income taxes payable 1,970
 2,005
Current portion of long-term debt 20,000
 20,000
Total current liabilities 151,244
 184,609
Long-term debt 241,986
 256,306
Deferred tax liabilities, net 88,111
 85,932
Other liabilities 6,729
 7,740
Total liabilities 488,070
 534,587
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) 
 
Stockholders’ equity:    
Preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001, authorized; no shares issued and outstanding 
 
Common stock, 60,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001, authorized; 29,975,848 and 29,731,189 shares issued at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively 3
 3
Treasury stock, 2,430,897 shares at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (65,221) (65,221)
Additional paid-in capital 699,716
 694,773
Accumulated deficit (131,452) (150,191)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (45,619) (51,637)
Total stockholders’ equity 457,427
 427,727
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $945,497
 $962,314
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4



Table of Contents


FTD COMPANIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Products

 

$

142,726

 

$

157,745

 

$

738,986

    

$

820,020

 

 

Services

 

 

30,428

 

 

30,774

 

 

103,341

 

 

102,081

 

 

Total revenues

 

 

173,154

 

 

188,519

 

 

842,327

 

 

922,101

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues—products

 

 

103,838

 

 

113,504

 

 

518,477

 

 

568,106

 

 

Cost of revenues—services

 

 

4,405

 

 

4,763

 

 

13,757

 

 

14,613

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

35,012

 

 

38,249

 

 

168,885

 

 

185,299

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

25,745

 

 

30,252

 

 

83,378

 

 

92,750

 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

15,240

 

 

15,317

 

 

45,873

 

 

46,054

 

 

Restructuring and other exit costs

 

 

612

 

 

1,495

 

 

2,230

 

 

5,907

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

184,852

 

 

203,580

 

 

832,600

 

 

912,729

 

 

Operating income/(loss)

 

 

(11,698)

 

 

(15,061)

 

 

9,727

 

 

9,372

 

 

Interest income

 

 

135

 

 

122

 

 

410

 

 

371

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

(2,429)

 

 

(2,450)

 

 

(7,273)

 

 

(7,366)

 

 

Other income/(expense), net

 

 

(9)

 

 

131

 

 

1,804

 

 

557

 

 

Income/(loss) before income taxes

 

 

(14,001)

 

 

(17,258)

 

 

4,668

 

 

2,934

 

 

Provision/(benefit) for income taxes

 

 

(4,028)

 

 

(779)

 

 

447

 

 

(440)

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

$

(9,973)

 

$

(16,479)

 

$

4,221

 

$

3,374

 

 

Earnings/(loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

 

$

(0.36)

 

$

(0.57)

 

$

0.15

 

$

0.12

 

 

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

 

$

(0.36)

 

$

(0.57)

 

$

0.15

 

$

0.11

 

 

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues:        
Products $293,228
 $302,249
 $574,192
 $595,540
Services 34,918
 35,990
 70,447
 72,913
Total revenues 328,146
 338,239
 644,639
 668,453
Operating expenses:        
Cost of revenues—products 198,682
 205,075
 390,809
 414,158
Cost of revenues—services 4,497
 4,669
 8,744
 9,352
Sales and marketing 76,224
 65,957
 145,120
 133,873
General and administrative 27,039
 28,389
 55,794
 58,133
Amortization of intangible assets 3,819
 15,217
 7,639
 30,633
Restructuring and other exit costs 136
 1,185
 944
 1,618
Total operating expenses 310,397
 320,492
 609,050
 647,767
Operating income 17,749
 17,747
 35,589
 20,686
Interest income 122
 154
 237
 275
Interest expense (2,562) (2,409) (4,950) (4,844)
Other income, net 223
 4
 198
 1,813
Income before income taxes 15,532
 15,496
 31,074
 17,930
Provision for income taxes 5,816
 3,721
 12,335
 4,404
Net income $9,716
 $11,775
 $18,739
 $13,526
Earnings per common share:        
Basic earnings per share $0.35
 $0.42
 $0.67
 $0.48
Diluted earnings per share $0.35
 $0.42
 $0.67
 $0.48
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5



Table of Contents


FTD COMPANIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

Net income/(loss)

 

$

(9,973)

 

$

(16,479)

 

$

4,221

 

$

3,374

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(2,902)

 

 

(5,020)

 

 

(14,510)

 

 

(4,227)

Cash flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in net gains on derivatives, net of tax of $54 and $37 for the quarters ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $147 and $31 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively

 

 

86

 

 

57

 

 

236

 

 

49

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

(2,816)

 

 

(4,963)

 

 

(14,274)

 

 

(4,178)

Total comprehensive loss

 

$

(12,789)

 

$

(21,442)

 

$

(10,053)

 

$

(804)

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Net income $9,716
 $11,775
 $18,739
 $13,526
Other comprehensive income/(loss):        
Foreign currency translation 4,124
 (7,597) 5,846
 (10,518)
Cash flow hedges:        
Changes in net gains on derivatives, net of tax of $53 and $51 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $107 and $93 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively 87
 81
 172
 150
Other comprehensive income/(loss) 4,211
 (7,516) 6,018
 (10,368)
Total comprehensive income $13,927
 $4,259
 $24,757
 $3,158
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6



Table of Contents


FTD COMPANIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Other

 

 

 

Total

 

 

Common Stock

 

Treasury Stock

 

Paid-In

 

Comprehensive

 

Accumulated

 

Stockholders’

 

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Shares

    

Amount

    

Capital

    

Loss

    

Deficit

    

Equity

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

29,427

 

$

3

 

(1,831)

 

$

(50,000)

 

$

678,558

 

$

(35,216)

 

$

(52,119)

 

$

541,226

Net income

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

4,221

 

 

4,221

Other comprehensive loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(14,274)

 

 

 —

 

 

(14,274)

Stock-based compensation

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,767

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

9,767

Tax shortfalls from equity awards

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(408)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(408)

Vesting of restricted stock units and related repurchases of common stock

 

163

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,645)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,645)

Repurchases of common stock

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(450)

 

 

(12,035)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(12,035)

Issuance of common stock through employee stock purchase plan

 

62

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,304

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

1,304

Balance at September 30, 2016

 

29,652

 

$

3

 

(2,281)

 

$

(62,035)

 

$

687,576

 

$

(49,490)

 

$

(47,898)

 

$

528,156

  Common Stock Treasury Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
  Shares Amount Shares Amount    
Balance at December 31, 2016 29,731
 $3
 (2,431) $(65,221) $694,773
 $(51,637) $(150,191) $427,727
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 
 18,739
 18,739
Other comprehensive income 
 
 
 
 
 6,018
 
 6,018
Stock-based compensation 
 
 
 
 5,870
 
 
 5,870
Vesting of restricted stock units and related repurchases of common stock 184
 
 
 
 (1,969) 
 
 (1,969)
Issuance of common stock through employee stock purchase plan 61
 
 
 
 1,042
 
 
 1,042
Balance at June 30, 2017 29,976
 $3
 (2,431) $(65,221) $699,716
 $(45,619) $(131,452) $457,427
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7



Table of Contents


FTD COMPANIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited, in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

    

2016

    

2015

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

4,221

 

$

3,374

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used for operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

63,502

 

 

63,265

Stock-based compensation

 

 

10,803

 

 

8,204

Provision for doubtful accounts receivable

 

 

2,936

 

 

1,315

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

1,020

 

 

1,020

Impairment of fixed assets

 

 

398

 

 

1,282

Deferred taxes, net

 

 

(14,519)

 

 

(9,108)

Excess tax (benefits) shortfalls from equity awards

 

 

408

 

 

(311)

Gains on life insurance

 

 

(1,583)

 

 

 —

Other, net

 

 

76

 

 

44

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition related purchase accounting adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

(1,791)

 

 

2,592

Inventories

 

 

(2,025)

 

 

(2,922)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

5,623

 

 

8,828

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

(72,996)

 

 

(59,951)

Deferred revenue

 

 

1,037

 

 

(2,022)

Income taxes receivable or payable

 

 

1,982

 

 

(11,462)

Other liabilities

 

 

(2,284)

 

 

(6,852)

Net cash used for operating activities

 

 

(3,192)

 

 

(2,704)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

 

 —

 

 

(9,935)

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(12,018)

 

 

(10,700)

Proceeds from life insurance

 

 

1,946

 

 

 —

Purchases of intangible assets

 

 

 —

 

 

(60)

Net cash used for investing activities

 

 

(10,072)

 

 

(20,695)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments on long-term debt

 

 

(15,000)

 

 

(35,000)

Exercise of stock options and purchases from employee stock plans

 

 

1,304

 

 

485

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

(13,680)

 

 

(22,021)

Excess tax benefits (shortfalls) from equity awards

 

 

(408)

 

 

311

Net cash used for financing activities

 

 

(27,784)

 

 

(56,225)

Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(652)

 

 

(872)

Change in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(41,700)

 

 

(80,496)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

57,892

 

 

95,595

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

16,192

 

$

15,099

  Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:    
Net income $18,739
 $13,526
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
Depreciation and amortization 18,583
 42,516
Stock-based compensation 5,870
 7,480
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable 779
 2,808
Amortization of debt issuance costs 680
 680
Impairment of fixed assets 
 398
Deferred taxes, net 1,758
 (8,935)
Gains on life insurance 
 (1,583)
Other, net (69) 60
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
Accounts receivable, net 3,887
 697
Inventories 170
 2,412
Prepaid expenses and other assets 5,049
 4,844
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (36,060) (45,927)
Deferred revenue 1,154
 2,374
Income taxes receivable or payable 66
 4,970
Other liabilities (997) (1,925)
Net cash provided by operating activities 19,609
 24,395
Cash flows from investing activities:    
Purchases of property and equipment (6,370) (8,176)
Proceeds from life insurance 
 944
Net cash used for investing activities (6,370) (7,232)
Cash flows from financing activities:    
Proceeds from long-term debt 70,000
 
Payments on long-term debt (85,000) (10,000)
Exercise of stock options and purchases from employee stock plans 1,042
 1,304
Repurchases of common stock withheld for taxes (1,969) (1,640)
Repurchases of common stock 
 (8,172)
Net cash used for financing activities (15,927) (18,508)
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 1,042
 (448)
Change in cash and cash equivalents (1,646) (1,793)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 81,002
 57,892
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $79,356
 $56,099
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

8



Table of Contents

FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION, ACCOUNTING POLICIES, AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Description of Business

FTD Companies, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “FTD” or the “Company”), is a premier floral and gifting company with a vision to be the leading and most trusted floral and gifting company in the world. Our mission is to inspire, support, and delight our customers when expressing life’s most important sentiments. We provide floral, specialty foods, gift, and related products and services to consumers, retail florists, and other retail locations and companies in need of floral and gifting solutions. Our business uses the highly recognized FTD® and Interflora® brands, both supported by the iconic Mercury Man® logo. While we operate primarily in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada, and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), and the Republic of Ireland, we have worldwide presence as our Mercury Man logo is displayed in approximately 40,00035,000 floral shops in nearly 150over 125 countries. Our diversified portfolio of brands also includes ProFlowers®, ProPlants®, Shari’s Berries®, Personal Creations®, RedEnvelope®, Flying Flowers®, Flowers Direct®, Ink CardsTM, PostagramTM, and Gifts.comTM. While floral arrangements and plants are our primary offerings, we also market and sell gift items, including gourmet-dipped berries and other sweets,specialty foods, personalized gifts, premium fresh fruit baskets, gift baskets, wine and champagne, jewelry, and spa products.

The principal operating subsidiaries of FTD Companies, Inc. are Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc., FTD.COM Inc. (“FTD.COM”), Provide Commerce, Inc. (“Provide Commerce”), FTD.COM Inc. (“FTD.COM”), and Interflora British Unit (“Interflora”). The operations of the Company include those of its subsidiary, Interflora, Inc., of which one‑thirdone-third is owned by a third party. The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Downers Grove, Illinois. The Company also maintains offices in San Diego and San Francisco, California; Woodridge, Illinois; Centerbrook, Connecticut; Sleaford, England; Quebec, Canada; and Hyderabad, India. The Company hasIndia; and distribution centers in various locations throughout the U.S.

Basis of Presentation

These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), including those for interim financial information, and with the instructions for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, such financial statements do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and operating results for the periods presented. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for any future periods. The condensed consolidated balance sheet information at December 31, 2015,2016, was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, but does not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP.

The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Company’s historical financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company.flows. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make accounting policy elections, estimates, and assumptions that affect a number of reported amounts and related disclosures in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. The most significant areas of the condensed consolidated financial statements that require management’s judgment include the Company’s revenue recognition, goodwill, indefinite‑livedindefinite-lived intangible assets and other long‑livedlong-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, income taxes, and legal contingencies.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10‑K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

2016.

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Accounting Policies

Refer to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10‑K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, for a discussion of the Company’s accounting policies.

9


Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest, became effective as of January 1, 2016. This update requires that debt issuance costs related to a debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, also became effective as of January 1, 2016. This update clarifies that an entity may elect to present debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset, regardless of whether or not there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company elected to present all debt issuance costs, including those associated with the Company’s revolving credit facility, consistently as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the liability. The Company has applied the provisions of ASU 2015-03 retrospectively to all periods presented, as required by the update. This resulted in a reclassification which reduced both other assets and the related outstanding debt by $4.0 million and $5.1 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

In March 2016,July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-04, Liabilities—Extinguishment of Liabilities—Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products. The amendments in this ASU specify how a company should derecognize amounts related to expected breakage of prepaid store-value products. Breakage should be recognized in proportion to the pattern of rights expected to be exercised by the product holder to the extent that it is probable a significant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied retrospectivelyor using a modified retrospective approach. The Company’s accounting for breakage already follows the guidance in this ASU. Therefore, the Company considered this ASU to have been adopted upon issuance.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU affect any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The amendments in this ASU require an entity to recognize revenue related to the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. Further, in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing to clarify identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. This guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in evaluating whether promised goods and services are distinct along with guidance to determine whether an entity promises to grant a license to a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property at a point in time or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property over a period of time. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amends the guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. The guidance also clarifies that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. In addition, ASU 2016-12 clarifies how an entity should evaluate the collectability threshold and when an entity can recognize nonrefundable consideration received as revenue if an arrangement does not meet the standard’s contract criteria.  The guidance under this topic was deferred by ASU 2015-14, issued by the FASB in August 2015, and is now effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these updates on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU Update (“ASU”) 2015-11, Inventory—Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330), which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. The ASU defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2017 on a prospective basis, as required, with no impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The amendments in this ASU simplify several aspects of the accounting for stock-based compensation, including the income tax consequences, the accounting for forfeitures, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the guidance related to the income tax expense requirements in the first quarter of 2017 on a prospective basis. As a result, the Company recognized all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit as a discrete event resulting in recognition of incremental income tax expense of $0.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and $1.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company adopted the provisions related to the classification on the statement of cash flows on a retrospective basis and prior periods have been adjusted to present the excess tax benefits/shortfalls as part of cash flows from operating activities. The result was a decrease in cash flows from operating activities and a corresponding increase in cash flows from financing activities of $0.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and an increase in cash flows from operating activities and a corresponding decrease in cash flows from financing activities of $0.3 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The Company elected not to change its policy on accounting for forfeitures and will continue to recognize expense based on an estimated forfeiture rate. In future periods, the adoption of this update does not applycould increase or reduce the Company’s reported income tax expense or benefit and cash flows from operating activities depending on the difference between the future price of the Company’s common stock at vesting or exercise as compared to inventorythe grant price.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. This standard was scheduled to be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020 and for interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is measured using last-in, first-out orpermitted for any goodwill impairment test performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. As the retail inventory method. The update appliesamendments within this ASU are meant to all other inventory, which includes

10


Tablereduce the complexity surrounding the evaluation of Contents

inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost methods.the Company’s goodwill for impairment, the Company elected to early adopt this ASU beginning January 1, 2017. The amendments in this ASU will be effectiveapplied prospectively to all of the Company’s future goodwill impairment tests performed on an interim or annual basis.

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, May 2016, and December 2016 within ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12, and ASU 2016-20, respectively (collectively, “Topic 606”). Topic 606 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of Topic 606 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for the Companythose goods or services. In addition, new and enhanced disclosures will be required. The guidance under this topic was deferred by ASU 2015-14 and is now effective for fiscal years and the interim periods within those years,beginning on or after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments must be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted. TheCompany plans to adopt Topic 606 in the first quarter of 2018, either on a full retrospective basis for each prior reporting period presented or on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Although the Company is currently assessingcontinuing to evaluate the impacts of its pending adoption of Topic 606, the Company does not believe there will be a material impact of this update onto its consolidated financial statements.

statements upon adoption.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial instruments, which includes amendments to address aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments must be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted for certain measurement enhancements within this amendment. Earlyamendment, early adoption is not permitted for other aspects updated in this amendment. The Company is currently assessing the impact ofdoes not believe that this update will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This update requires the recognition of certain lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet as well as the disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU require the recognition and measurement of leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients which may be elected by the Company. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and the interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation. The amendments in this ASU simplify several aspects of the accounting for stock-based compensation, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. These amendments are to be applied on a retrospective, modified retrospective, or prospective basis, depending on the related items. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). This update seeks to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables, and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments require an entity to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which guidance is effective, which is a modified-retrospective approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): ClarificationClassification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This update was issued to address the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, unless deemed impracticable, in which case, prospective application is permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. This update was issued to provide clarity and reduce diversity in practice as well as cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to the modification of terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards would require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The amendments will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

11


Table of Contents

2. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company reports its business in four reportable segments: Consumer, Provide Commerce, Consumer, Florist, and International.

Below is a reconciliation of segment revenues to consolidated revenues (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

    

Products revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

$

51,298

 

$

59,573

 

$

220,887

 

$

245,295

 

Provide Commerce

 

 

57,112

 

 

60,465

 

 

390,751

 

 

440,249

 

Florist

 

 

10,328

 

 

10,692

 

 

38,417

 

 

39,510

 

International

 

 

27,379

 

 

30,765

 

 

102,660

 

 

108,809

 

Segment products revenues

 

 

146,117

 

 

161,495

 

 

752,715

 

 

833,863

 

Services revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florist

 

 

26,277

 

 

26,061

 

 

88,538

 

 

86,412

 

International

 

 

4,222

 

 

4,773

 

 

15,037

 

 

15,891

 

Segment services revenues

 

 

30,499

 

 

30,834

 

 

103,575

 

 

102,303

 

Intersegment eliminations

 

 

(3,462)

 

 

(3,810)

 

 

(13,963)

 

 

(14,065)

 

Consolidated revenues

 

$

173,154

 

$

188,519

 

$

842,327

 

$

922,101

 

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Products revenues:        
Provide Commerce $179,691
 $176,542
 $335,559
 $333,639
Consumer 80,113
 90,876
 152,917
 169,483
Florist 12,813
 11,872
 28,982
 28,089
International 25,446
 28,516
 65,887
 74,667
Segment products revenues 298,063
 307,806
 583,345
 605,878
Services revenues:        
Florist 31,277
 31,486
 61,614
 62,261
International 3,755
 4,589
 9,051
 10,815
Segment services revenues 35,032
 36,075
 70,665
 73,076
Intersegment eliminations (4,949) (5,642) (9,371) (10,501)
Consolidated revenues $328,146
 $338,239
 $644,639
 $668,453
Intersegment revenues represent amounts charged from one segment to the other for services provided based on order volume at a set rate per order. Intersegment revenues by segment were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

    

Intersegment revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

$

(2,951)

 

$

(3,160)

 

$

(12,022)

 

$

(13,182)

 

Provide Commerce

 

 

(440)

 

 

(590)

 

 

(1,707)

 

 

(661)

 

Florist

 

 

(71)

 

 

(60)

 

 

(234)

 

 

(222)

 

Total intersegment revenues

 

$

(3,462)

 

$

(3,810)

 

$

(13,963)

 

$

(14,065)

 

12


  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Intersegment revenues:        
Provide Commerce $(505) $(656) $(981) $(1,266)
Consumer (4,330) (4,901) (8,172) (9,072)
Florist (114) (85) (218) (163)
Total intersegment revenues $(4,949) $(5,642) $(9,371) $(10,501)
Geographic revenues from sales to external customers were as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):
  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
U.S. $298,945
 $305,134
 $569,701
 $582,971
U.K. 29,201
 33,105
 74,938
 85,482
Consolidated revenues $328,146
 $338,239
 $644,639
 $668,453

Table of Contents

FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Below is a reconciliation of segment operating income/(loss)income to consolidated operating income/(loss)income and income/(loss)income before income taxes (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

    

Segment operating income/(loss)(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer

 

$

5,059

 

$

9,641

 

$

22,457

 

$

27,995

 

Provide Commerce

 

 

(1,847)

 

 

(5,679)

 

 

27,406

 

 

29,307

 

Florist

 

 

11,362

 

 

10,067

 

 

36,722

 

 

36,327

 

International

 

 

4,130

 

 

3,460

 

 

16,158

 

 

15,260

 

Total segment operating income

 

 

18,704

 

 

17,489

 

 

102,743

 

 

108,889

 

Unallocated expenses(b)

 

 

(9,416)

 

 

(11,198)

 

 

(29,514)

 

 

(36,252)

 

Depreciation expense and amortization of intangible assets

 

 

(20,986)

 

 

(21,352)

 

 

(63,502)

 

 

(63,265)

 

Operating income/(loss)

 

 

(11,698)

 

 

(15,061)

 

 

9,727

 

 

9,372

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

(2,294)

 

 

(2,328)

 

 

(6,863)

 

 

(6,995)

 

Other income/(expense), net

 

 

(9)

 

 

131

 

 

1,804

 

 

557

 

Income/(loss) before income taxes

 

$

(14,001)

 

$

(17,258)

 

$

4,668

 

$

2,934

 


  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Segment operating income(a)
        
Provide Commerce $14,543
 $22,177
 $27,990
 $29,253
Consumer 6,577
 10,878
 12,237
 17,307
Florist 12,248
 12,550
 26,202
 25,360
International 3,066
 3,963
 8,598
 11,380
Total segment operating income 36,434
 49,568
 75,027
 83,300
Unallocated expenses(b)
 (9,400) (10,582) (20,855) (20,098)
Depreciation expense and amortization of intangible assets (9,285) (21,239) (18,583) (42,516)
Operating income 17,749
 17,747
 35,589
 20,686
Interest expense, net (2,440) (2,255) (4,713) (4,569)
Other income, net 223
 4
 198
 1,813
Income before income taxes $15,532
 $15,496
 $31,074
 $17,930

(a)

Segment operating income/(loss)income is operating income/(loss)income excluding depreciation, amortization, litigation and dispute settlement charges orand gains, transaction-related costs, restructuring and other exit costs, and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. Stock‑basedIn addition, stock-based and incentive compensation and general corporate expenses are not allocated to the segments. Segment operating income/(loss)income is prior to intersegment eliminations and excludes other income/(expense), net.


(b)

Unallocated expenses include various corporate costs, such as executive management, corporate finance, legal, and certain human resourceslegal costs. In addition, unallocated expenses include stock‑basedstock-based and incentive compensation, for all eligible Company employees, restructuring and other exit costs, transaction-related costs, and litigation and dispute settlement charges orand gains.

Geographic revenues to external customers were as follows for the periods presented (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

    

U.S.

 

$

141,553

 

$

152,981

 

$

724,630

 

$

797,401

 

U.K.

 

 

31,601

 

 

35,538

 

 

117,697

 

 

124,700

 

Consolidated revenues

 

$

173,154

 

$

188,519

 

$

842,327

 

$

922,101

 

13


Table of Contents

3. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Financing Receivables

The Company has financing receivables related to equipment sales to its floral network members. The current and noncurrent portions of financing receivables are included in accounts receivable and other assets, respectively, in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company assesses financing receivables individually for balances due from current floral network members and collectively for balances due from terminated floral network members.

Credit quality of financing receivables was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30, 2016

    

December 31, 2015

Current

 

$

11,594

 

$

11,102

Past due

 

 

838

 

 

746

Total

 

$

12,432

 

$

11,848

  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Current $11,065
 $11,490
Past due 835
 865
Total $11,900
 $12,355
Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The aging of past due financing receivables was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30, 2016

    

December 31, 2015

 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016

Current

 

$

11,594

 

$

11,102
 $11,065
 $11,490

Past due:

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

1 - 150 days past due

 

 

110

 

 

152
 223
 120

151 - 364 days past due

 

 

155

 

 

175
 119
 129

365 - 730 days past due

 

 

236

 

 

242
 213
 230

731 or more days past due

 

 

337

 

 

177
 280
 386

Total

 

$

12,432

 

$

11,848
 $11,900
 $12,355

Financing receivables on nonaccrual status at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, totaled $0.9 million and $0.8$1.0 million, respectively.

The allowance for credit losses and the recorded investment in financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

    

2016

    

2015

Allowance for credit losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1

 

$

706

 

$

3,200

Provision

 

 

131

 

 

233

Write-offs charged against allowance

 

 

(66)

 

 

(2,799)

Balance at September 30

 

$

771

 

$

634

Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

767

 

$

588

Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

4

 

$

46

Recorded investments in financing receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

861

 

$

693

Balance individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

11,571

 

$

11,044

  Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016
Allowance for credit losses:    
Balance at January 1 $846
 $706
Provision 184
 88
Write-offs charged against allowance (249) (58)
Balance at June 30 $781
 $736
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment $745
 $736
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment $36
 $
Recorded investments in financing receivables:    
Balance collectively evaluated for impairment $856
 $839
Balance individually evaluated for impairment $11,044
 $11,254
Individually evaluated impaired loans, including the recorded investment in such loans, the unpaid principal balance, and the allowance related to such loans, each totaled less than $0.1 million at both SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015.2016. The average recorded investment in such loans was less than $0.1 million in each offor both the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015.2016. Interest income recognized on impaired loans was less than $0.1 million in each ofboth the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015.

2016.

14


Table of Contents

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30, 2016

    

December 31, 2015

Land and improvements

 

$

1,575

 

$

1,601

Buildings and improvements

 

 

16,195

 

 

16,303

Leasehold improvements

 

 

16,691

 

 

16,691

Equipment

 

 

13,996

 

 

13,711

Computer equipment

 

 

27,556

 

 

27,067

Computer software

 

 

58,504

 

 

50,897

Furniture and fixtures

 

 

3,406

 

 

3,564

 

 

 

137,923

 

 

129,834

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(79,845)

 

 

(65,081)

Total

 

$

58,078

 

$

64,753

  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Land and improvements $1,575
 $1,565
Buildings and improvements 16,162
 16,080
Leasehold improvements 17,899
 16,290
Equipment 15,507
 14,771
Computer equipment 25,568
 26,633
Computer software 64,929
 61,332
Furniture and fixtures 3,798
 3,310
  145,438
 139,981
Accumulated depreciation (92,211) (82,422)
Total $53,227
 $57,559
Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Depreciation expense, including the amortization of leasehold improvements, was $5.7$5.5 million and $6.0 million for the quartersthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, and $17.6$10.9 million and $17.2$11.9 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively.

4. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

Transactions with Liberty

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, Liberty Interactive Corporation (“Liberty”) owned approximately 37%37.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of FTD common stock. An Investor Rights Agreement governs certain rights of and restrictions on Liberty in connection with the shares of FTD common stock that Liberty owns. On December 31, 2014, in conjunction with the acquisition of Provide Commerce, Provide Commerce and Liberty entered into a services agreement (the “Services Agreement”), under which Provide Commerce, on a short-term transitional basis, provided Liberty with certain support service and other assistance after the acquisition in respect of the RedEnvelope business, an online e-commerce business that was not acquired by FTD as part of the acquisition. Fees of $0.3 million were earned in 2015 during the term of the Services Agreement. On April 1, 2015, Provide Commerce and Liberty entered into an amendment to the Services Agreement to extend the term of the Services Agreement to June 30, 2015. The Services Agreement terminated on June 30, 2015.

The acquisition purchase price was subject to adjustment based upon the final closing working capital, which adjustment was determined to be $9.9 million. In April 2015, FTD made a payment to Liberty in full satisfaction of this adjustment.

On April 30, 2015, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Liberty, pursuant to which the Company acquired certain residual assets previously used by Liberty in the RedEnvelope business for a cash purchase price of $0.3 million. The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired based on their relative fair values, resulting in allocated values of $0.1 million to fixed assets, $0.1 million to inventory, and $0.1 million to the trademark and trade name.

15


Table of Contents

The I.S. Group Limited

Interflora holds an equity investment of 20.4% in The I.S. Group Limited (“I.S. Group”). The investment was $1.5 million and $1.6$1.4 million, respectively, at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015, respectively,2016, and is included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. I.S. Group supplies floral-related products to Interflora’s floral network members in both the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland as well as to other customers. Interflora derives revenues from I.S. Group from (i) the sale of products (sourced from third-party suppliers) to I.S. Group for which revenue is recognized on a gross basis, (ii) commissions on products sold by I.S. Group (sourced from third-party suppliers) to floral network members, and (iii) commissions for acting as a collection agent on behalf of I.S. Group. Revenues related to products sold to and commissions earned from I.S. Group were $0.5$0.4 million and $0.6$0.5 million in the quartersthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and 2015, and $1.8$1.1 million and $2.0$1.4 million forin the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, and 2015.respectively. In addition, Interflora purchases products from I.S. Group for sale to consumers. The cost of revenues related to products purchased from I.S. Group was $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million in the quartersthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, and $0.4$0.1 million and $0.3 million forin the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. Amounts due from I.S. Group were $0.2 million and $0.3 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively, and amounts payable to I.S. Group were $0.9$0.8 million and $1.4$1.2 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively.

5. GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE ASSETS, AND OTHER LONG‑LIVEDLONG-LIVED ASSETS

Goodwill

The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provide

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Consumer

 

Commerce

    

Florist

    

International

    

Total

Goodwill at December 31, 2015

 

$

133,226

 

$

231,501

 

$

109,651

 

$

87,278

 

$

561,656

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(10,448)

 

 

(10,448)

Goodwill at September 30, 2016

 

$

133,226

 

$

231,501

 

$

109,651

 

$

76,830

 

$

551,208
  Provide Commerce Consumer Florist International Total
Goodwill at December 31, 2016 $147,501
 $133,226
 $109,651
 $73,087
 $463,465
Foreign currency translation 
 
 
 4,057
 4,057
Goodwill at June 30, 2017 $147,501
 $133,226
 $109,651
 $77,144
 $467,522

In 2016, 2015, and 2008, the Company recorded impairment charges of $84.0 million, $85.0 million, and $116.3 million, respectively. The accumulated total goodwill impairment was $285.3 million at June 30, 2017. The table above reflects the Company’s goodwill balances net of the accumulated impairment charges. The gross goodwill balance was $752.5 million at September 30, 2016.


Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


Intangible Assets


Intangible assets are primarily related to the acquisition of Provide Commerce in December 2014 and the acquisition of the Company by United Online, Inc. in August 2008 and the acquisition of Provide Commerce in December 2014 and consist of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

Gross

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

    

Value

    

Amortization

    

Net

    

Value

    

Amortization

    

Net

Complete technology

 

$

76,752

 

$

(53,153)

 

$

23,599

 

$

77,494

 

$

(48,438)

 

$

29,056

Customer contracts and relationships

 

 

192,982

 

 

(181,594)

 

 

11,388

 

 

195,209

 

 

(149,636)

 

 

45,573

Trademarks and trade names

 

 

269,572

 

 

(14,832)

 

 

254,740

 

 

274,606

 

 

(8,676)

 

 

265,930

Total

 

$

539,306

 

$

(249,579)

 

$

289,727

 

$

547,309

 

$

(206,750)

 

$

340,559

  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Gross Value Accumulated Amortization Net Gross Value Accumulated Amortization Net
Complete technology $76,774
 $(58,624) $18,150
 $76,486
 $(54,705) $21,781
Customer contracts and relationships 193,048
 (193,048) 
 192,183
 (192,183) 
Trademarks and trade names:            
Definite-lived 120,333
 (20,847) 99,486
 120,290
 (16,817) 103,473
Indefinite-lived 149,456
 
 149,456
 147,544
 
 147,544
Total $539,611
 $(272,519) $267,092
 $536,503
 $(263,705) $272,798
Some of the Company’s trademarks and trade names are indefinite‑livedindefinite-lived assets for which there is no associated amortization expense or accumulated amortization. At SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, such indefinite‑livedindefinite-lived assets, after impairment and foreign currency translation adjustments, totaled $149.3$149.5 million and $154.2$147.5 million, respectively.

16


Table of Contents

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, estimated future intangible assets amortization expense for each of the next five years and thereafter, was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

    

Future Amortization Expense

2016 (remainder of year)

    

$

15,209

2017

 

 

15,273

2018

 

 

15,273

2019

 

 

15,273

2020

 

 

8,004

Thereafter

 

 

71,387

Total

 

$

140,419

For the Year EndedFuture Amortization Expense
2017 (remainder of the year)$7,639
201815,278
201915,278
20208,009
20218,006
Thereafter63,426
Total$117,636
6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

Credit Agreement

On July 17, 2013,September 19, 2014, FTD Companies, Inc. entered into a credit agreement (the “2013 Credit“Credit Agreement”) with Interflora, certain wholly-ownedwholly owned domestic subsidiaries of FTD Companies, Inc. party thereto as guarantors, the financial institutions party thereto from time to time, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent which provided for a $350 million five‑year revolving credit facility. On July 17, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. drew $220 million of the new $350 million revolving credit facility and used this, together with approximately $19 million of its existing cash balance, to repay amounts outstanding under its previous credit facility in full and to pay fees and expenses related to the 2013 Credit Agreement. 

On September 19, 2014, the Company entered into an amendment to the 2013 Credit Agreement which amended and restated the 2013 Credit Agreement in its entirety (as amended and restated, the “Amended Credit Agreement”). Among other things, the Amendedlenders. The Credit Agreement provided for a term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million, the proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of outstanding revolving loans, and also provided for a revolving loan advance (the “Acquisition Advance”) to finance the cash portion of the Provide Commerce acquisition purchase price.

The proceeds of the term loan were used to repay a portion of outstanding revolving loans and, on

On December 31, 2014, the Company borrowed $120 million under the Acquisition Advance to financefund the cash portion of the acquisition purchase price of Provide Commerce. The obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of FTD Companies, Inc.’s wholly-ownedwholly owned domestic subsidiaries (together with FTD Companies, Inc., the “U.S. Loan Parties”). In addition, the obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the U.S. Loan Parties, including a pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock of certain direct subsidiaries of the U.S. Loan Parties (except with respect to foreign subsidiaries and certain domestic subsidiaries whose assets consist primarily of foreign subsidiary equity interests, in which case such pledge is limited to 66% of the outstanding capital stock).

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The interest rates applicable to borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are based on either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% per annum to 2.50% per annum, or a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.50% per annum to 1.50% per annum, calculated according to the Company’s net leverage ratio. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the base rate margin was 0.75% per annum and the LIBOR margin was 1.75% per annum. In addition, the Company pays a commitment fee ranging from 0.20% per annum to 0.40% per annum on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. The stated interest rates (based on LIBOR) at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 under the term loan and the revolving credit facility were 2.59%3.05% and 2.27%2.98%, respectively. The effective interest rates at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 under the term loan and the revolving credit facility were 3.39%3.99% and 3.06%3.51%, respectively. The commitment fee rate at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 was 0.25%. The Amended Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, events of default, affirmative covenants and negative covenants, that, among other things, require the Company to maintain compliance with a maximum net leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, and impose restrictions and limitations on, among other things, investments, dividends, share repurchases, and asset sales, and the Company’s ability to incur additional debt and additional liens.

17


Table of Contents

The term loan is subject to amortization payments of $5.0 million per quarter and customary mandatory prepayments under certain conditions. The outstanding balance of the term loan and all amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are due upon maturity in September 2019. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the future minimum principal payments through the maturity date of the Amended Credit Agreement were as follows for each of the next five years (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended

    

Future Minimum Principal Payments

2016 (remainder of year)

    

$

5,000

2017

 

 

20,000

2018

 

 

20,000

2019

 

 

240,000

2020

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

285,000

For the Year Ended Future Minimum Principal Payments
2017 (remainder of the year) $10,000
2018 20,000
2019 235,000
Total $265,000
At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the remaining borrowing capacity under the Amended Credit Agreement, which was reduced by $2.9$2.7 million in outstanding letters of credit, was $227.1 million. The carrying amounts$232.3 million, subject to certain limitations under covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. After giving effect to the net leverage ratio contained in the Credit Agreement, approximately $100 million was available for additional borrowing as of June 30, 2017 based on 3.25 times the term loan and revolving credit facility are nettotal of debt issuance costs asAdjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Company adopted ASU 2015-03 (see Note 1) duringCredit Agreement) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and applied the changes retrospectively, as required by the ASU. last twelve months.
The changes in the Company’s debt balances for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

December 31,

 

Repayments

 

September 30,

 December 31, 2016 Draw Down of Debt Repayments of Debt June 30, 2017

    

2015

    

of Debt

    

2016

Amended Credit Agreement:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Agreement:  
    
  

Revolving Credit Facility

 

$

120,000

 

$

 —

 

$

120,000
 $120,000
 $70,000
 $(75,000) $115,000

Term Loan

 

 

180,000

 

 

(15,000)

 

 

165,000
 160,000
 
 (10,000) 150,000

Total Principal Outstanding

 

 

300,000

 

$

(15,000)

 

 

285,000
 280,000
 $70,000
 $(85,000) 265,000

Debt Issuance Costs

 

 

(5,054)

 

 

 

 

 

(4,034)
 (3,694)    
 (3,014)

Total Debt, Net of Debt Issuance Costs

 

$

294,946

 

 

 

 

$

280,966
 $276,306
    
 $261,986

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In March 2012, the Company purchased, for $1.9 million, forward starting interest rate cap instruments based on 3-month LIBOR, effective January 2015 through June 2018. The forward starting interest rate cap instruments have aggregated notional values totaling $130 million. The interest rate cap instruments are designated as cash flow hedges against expected future cash flows attributable to future 3-month LIBOR interest payments on a portion of the outstanding borrowings under the Company’s Amended Credit Agreement. The gains or losses on the instruments are reported in other comprehensive income/(loss) to the extent that they are effective and are reclassified into earnings when the cash flows attributable to 3-month LIBOR interest payments are recognized in earnings.

18


Table of Contents

The estimated fair values and notional values of outstanding derivative instruments at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of

 

Notional Value of

 

 

 

Derivative Instruments

 

Derivative Instruments

 

Balance Sheet

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

   Estimated Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Notional Value of Derivative Instruments

    

Location

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

 Balance Sheet Location June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016

Derivative Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          

Interest rate caps

 

Other assets

 

$

1

 

$

35

 

$

130,000

 

$

130,000
 Other assets $
 $1
 $130,000
 $130,000

The Company recognized the following losses from derivatives, before tax, in other comprehensive lossincome/(loss) (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate caps

 

$

 —

 

$

(38)

 

$

(34)

 

$

(296)

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments:        
Interest rate caps $
 $(7) $(1) $(34)
The effective portion, before tax effect, of the Company’s interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedging instruments was $1.0$0.6 million and $1.4$0.8 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, $0.6 million of this amount was expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome/(loss) into interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations within the next twelve months. During each of the quartersthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, $0.2 million and 2015, $0.1 million, respectively, was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome/(loss) into interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. During each ofboth the ninesix month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, $0.4$0.3 million was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome/(loss) into interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table presents estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities and derivative instruments that were required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

    

Total

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Total

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

1,747

 

$

1,747

 

$

 —

 

$

7,024

 

$

7,024

 

$

 —

Derivative assets

 

 

1

 

 

 —

 

 

1

 

 

35

 

 

 —

 

 

35

Total

 

$

1,748

 

$

1,747

 

$

1

 

$

7,059

 

$

7,024

 

$

35

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-qualified deferred compensation plan

 

$

2,437

 

$

 —

 

$

2,437

 

$

3,950

 

$

 —

 

$

3,950

Total

 

$

2,437

 

$

 —

 

$

2,437

 

$

3,950

 

$

 —

 

$

3,950

  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Total Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2
Assets:            
Cash equivalents $24,677
 $24,677
 $
 $13,197
 $13,197
 $
Derivative assets 
 
 
 1
 
 1
Total $24,677
 $24,677
 $
 $13,198
 $13,197
 $1
Liabilities:            
Non-qualified deferred compensation plan $1,304
 $
 $1,304
 $2,371
 $
 $2,371
Total $1,304
 $
 $1,304
 $2,371
 $
 $2,371
Provide Commerce has an executive deferred compensation plan for key management level employees under which such employees could elect to defer receipt of current compensation. This plan is intended to be an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan that complies with the provisions of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. At the time of the acquisition, contributions to the plan were suspended except those relating to any compensation earned but not yet paid as of the same date. The plan assets, which consist primarily of life insurance contracts recorded at their cash surrender value, were $11.7 million and $11.6 million and $12.0 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016, respectively, and are included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company estimated the fair value of its long‑termlong-term debt using a discounted cash flow approach that incorporates a market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration and risk profile. In determining the market interest yield curve, the Company considered, among other factors, its estimated credit spread. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the Company estimated its credit spread as 1.5%1.0% and 2.1%1.6% for the term loan and revolving credit facility, respectively, resulting in yield-to-maturity estimates for the term loan and revolving credit facility of 2.4% and 3.0%, respectively. At December 31, 2015,2016, the Company estimated its credit spread as 2.1%1.4% and 2.7%2.0% for the term loan and revolving credit facility, respectively, resulting in yield-to-maturity estimates for the term loan and revolving credit facility of 3.5%2.8% and

19


Table of Contents

4.1% 3.4%, respectively. The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and estimated fair values for long-term debt (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Level 2

 

 

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

Long-term debt outstanding, including current portion

 

$

285,000

 

$

285,000

 

$

300,000

 

$

297,876

  June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
    Level 2   Level 2
  Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value
Long-term debt outstanding, including current portion $265,000
 $265,000
 $280,000
 $280,000
Fair value approximates the carrying amount of financing receivables because such receivables are discounted at a rate comparable to market. Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, short‑termshort-term accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts because of their short‑termshort-term nature.

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock Repurchases

On February 27, 2014, the Company’s board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program (the “2014 Repurchase Program”) that allowed FTD Companies, Inc. to repurchase up to $50 million of its common stock in both open market and privately negotiated transactions. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased 1.8 million shares under the 2014 Repurchase Program at an average cost per share of $27.31, fully utilizing the $50 million authorization.

On March 8, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program (the “2016 Repurchase Program”) that allows FTD Companies, Inc. to repurchase up to $60 million of its common stock from time to time over a two‑yeartwo-year period in both open market and privately negotiated transactions. As of September 30,December 31, 2016, the company hashad repurchased 0.450.6 million shares under the 2016 Repurchase Program at an average cost per share of $26.75. In addition, during October 2016, the$25.37. The Company repurchased an additional 0.15 milliondid not repurchase any shares under this program during the 2016 Repurchase Program at an average cost per share of $21.24. Repurchased shares generally are held in treasury pending use for general corporate purposes, including issuances under various employee and director stock plans.

six months ended June 30, 2017.

Upon vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) or exercise of stock options, the Company does not collect the minimum statutory withholding taxes in cash from employees. Instead, the Company automatically withholds, from the RSUs that vest or stock options that are exercised, the portion of those shares with a fair market value equal to the amount of the minimum statutory withholding taxes due. The withheld shares are accounted for as repurchases of common stock but are not counted against the limits under the 2016 Repurchase Program. The Company then pays the minimum statutory withholding taxes in cash. During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, 0.22017, 0.3 million RSUs vested for which 0.1 million shares were withheld to cover the minimum statutory withholding taxes of $1.6$2.0 million.

10. INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS

In June 2015,2017, stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the FTD Companies, Inc. Third Amended and Restated 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan (as so amended and restated, the “Plan”“Amended Plan”), which amended and restated in its entirety the FTD Companies, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan, as previously amended June 9, 2015. The Amended Plan provides for the granting of awards to employees and non-employee directors, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSUs, and other stock based awards. Under the Plan, 5.2 million shares of FTD common stock have been reserved for issuance of awards. At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the Company had 3.03.2 million shares available for issuance under the Plan.

On March 7, 2016,Amended Plan, which includes additional shares approved by shareholders in June 2017. In addition, eligible employees of the Company are able to participate in the FTD Companies, Inc. 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan through which employees may purchase shares of FTD common stock at a discount.

During the first quarter of 2017, the Company granted RSUs to certain employees totaling 0.30.4 million shares. The RSUs granted will generally vest in four equal annual installments beginning on February 15, 2017.January 3, 2018. The weighted average fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date was $23.12.
During the second quarter of 2017, the Company granted RSUs to certain non-employee directors totaling 0.1 million shares. The RSUs granted will vest in one annual installment on June 1, 2018. The fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date was $24.01.

$17.70.

20


Table of Contents

On March 7, 2016, the compensation committee of the FTD board of directors adopted the 2016 Management Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”). The Bonus Plan is an annual incentive programwhich will pay out in cash, stock, or a combination of both, depending on level and performance of each eligible employee. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense associated with the Bonus Plan which is included in accrued compensationin the condensed consolidated balance sheets. 

The stock‑based compensation expense incurred for bothall equity and liability-classified stock-based awardsplans in the quartersthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 hasthe six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 have been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

 2017 2016 2017 2016

Cost of revenues

 

$

45

 

$

36

 

$

111

 

$

65
 $63
 $28
 $134
 $66

Sales and marketing

 

 

870

 

 

1,014

 

 

3,251

 

 

2,151
 1,615
 1,147
 2,330
 2,381

General and administrative

 

 

2,408

 

 

2,814

 

 

7,441

 

 

5,988
 1,851
 2,265
 3,406
 5,033

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

3,323

 

$

3,864

 

$

10,803

 

$

8,204
 $3,529
 $3,440
 $5,870
 $7,480

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


11. INCOME TAXES

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $4.0 million on a pre-tax loss of $14.0 million, compared to a tax benefit of $0.8 million on pre-tax loss of $17.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to an expected increase in full year pre-tax income compared to the prior year.

During the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, the Company recorded a tax provision of $0.4$5.8 million on pre-tax income of $4.7$15.5 million, compared to a tax benefitprovision of $0.4$3.7 million on pre-tax income of $2.9$15.5 million for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to an expected increase in fullexpected fiscal year pre-tax income over the prior year combined with a higher portion of pre-tax income expected to be earned in higher rate jurisdictions as well as a reduction in foreign tax benefits. In addition, tax deficiencies related to vesting of equity awards increased tax expense by $0.5 million. As noted in Note 1—“Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies, and Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” ASU 2016-09 was adopted on January 1, 2017. As such, tax deficiencies or excess tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2017 rather than in additional paid-in capital as was previously required.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded a tax provision of $12.3 million on pre-tax income of $31.1 million, compared to a tax provision of $4.4 million on pre-tax income of $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The effective tax rate increased due to an increase in expected fiscal year pre-tax income over the prior year.

year combined with a higher portion of pre-tax income expected to be earned in higher rate jurisdictions as well as a reduction in foreign tax benefits. In addition, tax deficiencies related to vesting of equity awards increased tax expense by $1.4 million. As noted in Note 1—“Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies, and Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” ASU 2016-09 was adopted on January 1, 2017. As such, tax deficiencies or excess tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017 rather than in additional paid-in capital as was previously required.    

12. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Certain of the Company’s RSUs are considered participating securities because they contain a non‑forfeitablenon-forfeitable right to dividends irrespective of whether dividends are actually declared or paid or whether the awards ultimately vest. Accordingly, the Company computes earnings per share pursuant to the two‑classtwo-class method in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share.

21


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

$

(9,973)

 

$

(16,479)

 

$

4,221

 

$

3,374

Income allocated to participating securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(85)

 

 

(52)

Net income/(loss) attributable to common stockholders

 

$

(9,973)

 

$

(16,479)

 

$

4,136

 

$

3,322

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic average common shares outstanding

 

 

27,386

 

 

28,667

 

 

27,560

 

 

28,857

Add: Dilutive effect of non-participating securities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

52

 

 

52

Diluted average common shares outstanding

 

 

27,386

 

 

28,667

 

 

27,612

 

 

28,909

Basic earnings/(loss) per common share

 

$

(0.36)

 

$

(0.57)

 

$

0.15

 

$

0.12

Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share

 

$

(0.36)

 

$

(0.57)

 

$

0.15

 

$

0.11

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Numerator:        
Net income $9,716
 $11,775
 $18,739
 $13,526
Income allocated to participating securities (228) (246) (434) (279)
Net income attributable to common stockholders $9,488
 $11,529
 $18,305
 $13,247
Denominator:        
Basic average common shares outstanding 27,452
 27,640
 27,415
 27,647
Add: Dilutive effect of securities 
 55
 34
 58
Diluted average common shares outstanding 27,452
 27,695
 27,449
 27,705
Basic earnings per common share $0.35
 $0.42
 $0.67
 $0.48
Diluted earnings per common share $0.35
 $0.42
 $0.67
 $0.48
The diluted earnings/(loss)earnings per common share computations exclude stock options and RSUs which are antidilutive. Weighted‑averageWeighted-average antidilutive shares for the quarter and ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016 were 2.14.1 million and 2.2 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were 3.5 million and 2.3 million, respectively.

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


13. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER EXIT COSTS

Restructuring and other exit costs were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee

 

Facility

 

Asset

 

 

 

 

 

Termination

 

Closure

 

Impairments/

 

 

 

 

    

Costs

    

Costs

    

Write-offs

    

Total

Accrued as of December 31, 2015

 

$

40

 

$

1,452

 

$

 —

 

$

1,492

Charges

 

 

596

 

 

1,060

 

 

574

 

 

2,230

Cash paid

 

 

(302)

 

 

(1,692)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,994)

Other adjustments

 

 

12

 

 

(46)

 

 

(574)

 

 

(608)

Accrued as of September 30, 2016

 

$

346

 

$

774

 

$

 —

 

$

1,120

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred restructuring and other exit costs of $2.2 million primarily related to lease termination and exit costs. Such costs are associated primarily with the shutdown of certain Provide Commerce locations. The Company currently does not expect significant additional costs related to these actions.

  Employee Termination Costs Facility Closure Costs Total
Accrued as of December 31, 2016 $8,566
 $1,378
 $9,944
Charges 637
 307
 944
Cash paid (2,631) (602) (3,233)
Other – non-cash (3,373) 
 (3,373)
Accrued as of June 30, 2017 $3,199
 $1,083
 $4,282
14. CONTINGENCIES—LEGAL MATTERS

Commencing on August 19, 2009, the first of a series of putative consumer class action lawsuits was brought against Provide Commerce, Inc. and co-defendant Regent Group, Inc. d/b/a Encore Marketing International (“EMI”). These cases were ultimately consolidated during the next three years into Case No. 09 CV 2094 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California under the title In re EasySaver Rewards Litigation. Plaintiffs’ claims arise from their online enrollment in subscription based membership programs known as EasySaver Rewards, RedEnvelope Rewards, and Preferred Buyers Pass (collectively the “Membership Programs”). Plaintiffs claim that after they ordered items from certain of Provide Commerce’s websites, they were presented with an offer to enroll in one of the Membership Programs, each of which is offered and administered by EMI. Plaintiffs purport to represent a putative nationwide class of consumers allegedly damaged by Provide Commerce’s purported unauthorized or otherwise allegedly improper transferring of the putative class members’ billing information to EMI, who then posted allegedly unauthorized charges to their credit or debit card accounts for membership fees for the Membership Programs. On February 22, 2010, Provide Commerce and EMI respectively filed motions to dismiss. On August 13, 2010,In the court entered an order granting in part and denying in part the motions. Between August 13, 2010 and December 2011, plaintiffs filed various amended complaints and added or dismissed certain named plaintiffs. Plaintiffs filed theoperative fourth amended complaint, on December 14, 2011. The fourth amended complaint is the operative complaint. Plaintiffs assertplaintiffs asserted ten claims against Provide Commerce and EMI in the fourth amended complaint:EMI: (1) breach of contract (against Provide

22


Table of Contents

Commerce only); (2) breach of contract (against EMI only); (3) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (4) fraud; (5) violations of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act; (6) unjust enrichment; (7) violation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (against EMI only); (8) invasion of privacy; (9) negligence; and (10) violations of the Unfair Competition Law. Plaintiffs assert their claims individually and on behalf of a putative nationwide class. Plaintiffs soughtseek damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Provide Commerce and EMI filed motions to dismissAfter motion practice regarding the claims of plaintiffs Lawler, Walters, Cox,asserted and Dickey on January 24, 2012. The motions to dismiss were fully briefed as of February 23, 2012, but the court had not yet conducted a hearing or ruled on the motions. The parties participated in numerous settlement conferences and mediations throughout the case in an effort to informally resolve this matter. On April 9, 2012,the matter, the parties reached an agreement on the high level terms of a settlement on April 9, 2012, conditioned on the parties negotiating and executing a complete written agreement. In the weeks following April 9, 2012, the parties negotiated a formal written settlement agreement (“Settlement”(the “Settlement”). Upon reaching, which the Settlement, the hearing on the motions to dismiss was vacated, and Provide Commerce and EMI have not answered the fourth amended complaint in light of the Settlement. The court granted the plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the Settlementpreliminarily approved on June 13, 2012. After notice to the purported class and briefing by the parties, the court conducted a final approval hearing (also known as a fairness hearing) on January 28, 2013, and took the matter under submission at the conclusion of the hearing.but did not rule. On February 4, 2013, the court entered its final order approving class action settlement,the Settlement, granting plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive awards, and overruling objections filed by a single objector to the Settlement.objector. The court entered judgment on the Settlement on February 21, 2013. The objector filed a notice of appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on March 4, 2013. After the completion of briefing, the Ninth Circuit set oral argument on the appeal for February 2, 2015. But on January 29, 2015, the Ninth Circuit entered an order deferring argument and resolution of the appeal pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision in a matter captioned Frank v.  Netflix, No. 12 15705+. The Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Frank v.  Netflix, No. 12 15705+ on February 27, 2015, affirming the district court’s approval of a settlement between Walmart and a class of Netflix DVD subscribers. On March 19, 2015, the Ninth Circuit entered an order vacating the judgment in this matter and remanding it to the district court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion in Frank v. Netflix. The Ninth Circuit’s mandate issued on April 14, 2015, and the matter is now pending before the district court to consider final approval of the Settlement in light of Frank v. Netflix. On April 23, 2015, the district court entered an order reopening the case and ordering the parties to jointly submit a memorandum summarizing the import of the Frank v. Netflix decision and stating their intentions going forward. On May 4, 2015, such memorandum was filed by the parties, and the objector also filed his own memorandum regarding these same topics on such date. After receiving the parties, and objector’s memoranda, theFebruary 27, 2015. The district court ordered supplemental briefing on the issue of final Settlement approval on May 21, 2015. The parties filed their respective opening supplemental briefs on June 18, 2015, the objector filed his opposition supplemental brief on July 2, 2015, and the parties filed their respective reply supplemental briefs on July 16, 2015. The pending final settlement approval motion was heard byAfter briefing, the district court conducted a hearing on July 27, 2016 and takentook the matter under submission. On August 9, 2016, the district court entered an order reapproving the Settlement without any changes, and accordingly entered judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice. TheOn September 6, 2016, the objector filed a notice of appealappeal. On November 22, 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment, to which the objector responded and filed a cross-motion for sanctions. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary affirmance temporarily stayed briefing on September 6, 2016.the appeal. On March 2, 2017, the Ninth Circuit denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary affirmance and objector’s cross-motion for sanctions, and reset the briefing schedule. The objector filed his opening brief on May 1, 2017. Thirteen state Attorneys General filed an amicus brief in support of the objector on May 8, 2017. The parties filed their answering briefs on June 30, 2017. Various legal aid organizations filed an amicus brief in support of no party regarding cy pres relief also on June 30, 2017. The objector’s optional reply brief is presently due August 14, 2017. The date for oral argument on the appeal has not yet been set.

Table of Contents
FTD COMPANIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)


The Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, asserting violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. Plaintiff’s complaint in Winograd v. FTD Companies, Inc. et al., filed on March 20, 2017, Case No. 1:17-cv-02135, alleged that the Company made false and misleading statements regarding the assessment of cross-border indirect taxes, internal controls over financial reporting, and the acquisition of Provide Commerce from Liberty Interactive Corporation that were revealed as such to the market on March 14, 2017.  Plaintiff purported to bring the lawsuit as a class action representing all those who purchased or otherwise acquired Company securities between March 13, 2015 and March 14, 2017.  On May 26, 2017, Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT was appointed Lead Plaintiff. On July 25, 2017, the Lead Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.
The Company was a nominal defendant in consolidated shareholder derivative suits against its directors and former CEO and CFO in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, asserting claims for breaches of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, and corporate waste.  In Atallah v. Apatoff et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-02773, filed on April 12, 2017, the plaintiff alleged that the individual defendants caused the Company to issue false and misleading statements regarding the assessment of cross-border indirect taxes, internal controls over financial reporting, and the acquisition of Provide Commerce from Liberty Interactive Corporation that were revealed as such to the market on March 14, 2017. In Palkon v. Berglass et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-03233, filed on April 28, 2017, the plaintiff additionally alleged that the individual defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breached their fiduciary duties to the Company, wasted corporate assets, and were unjustly enriched when certain of the defendants negligently issued or caused to be issued false and misleading statements to shareholders in the November 3, 2014 special proxy regarding the acquisition of Provide Commerce from Liberty Interactive Corporation. On June 15, 2017, Atallah and Palkon were consolidated for all purposes, and plaintiffs were ordered to file a consolidated amended complaint by July 31, 2017. On July 31, 2017, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.
There are no assurances that other legal actions or governmental investigations will not be instituted in connection with the Company’s current or former business practices. The Company cannot predict the outcome of governmental investigations or other legal actions or their potential implications for its business.

The Company records a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company evaluates, at least quarterly, developments in its legal matters that could affect the assessment of the probability of loss or the amount of liability that has been previously accrued, and makes adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both probability and the estimated amount. The Company may be unable to estimate a possible loss or range of possible loss due to various reasons, including, among others: (i) if the damages sought are indeterminate, (ii) if the proceedings are in early stages, (iii) if there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals, motions or settlements, (iv) if there are significant factual issues to be determined or resolved, and (v) if there are novel or unsettled legal theories presented. In such instances, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the ultimate resolution of such matters, including a possible eventual loss, if any. At Septemberboth June 30, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the Company had reserves totaling $3.8$3.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for estimated losses related to certain legal matters. With respect to other legal matters, the Company has determined, based on its current knowledge, that the amount of possible loss or range of loss, including any reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts already accrued, is not reasonably estimable. However, legal matters are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. As such, there can be no assurance that the final outcome of these matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

23


Table of Contents

15. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following table sets forth supplemental cash flow disclosures (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

    

2016

    

2015

Cash paid for interest

 

$

5,764

 

$

6,088

Cash paid for income taxes, net

 

$

12,688

 

$

20,696

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On November 3, 2016, Christopher W. Shean, one of the Directors of FTD Companies, Inc., was appointed interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Shean succeeds Robert S. Apatoff, who has stepped down from these positions and from the FTD Board of Directors. Mr. Apatoff will continue in a transitional advisory role with the Company through December 31, 2016. Under the terms of Mr. Apatoff’s employment agreement, he is entitled to the severance and other benefits described in such agreement, including estimated cash severance payments totaling approximately $4.6 million as well as full and accelerated vesting of all of his outstanding nonvested restricted stock units and unvested stock options, subject in each case to his compliance with certain covenants in the employment agreement. Mr. Apatoff’s employment agreement has previously been filed with the SEC.

24


  Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2017 2016
Cash paid for interest $4,074
 $3,601
Cash paid for income taxes, net 10,517
 8,201

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

FTD Companies, Inc.  (together(which together with its subsidiaries may be referred to herein as the “Company,” “FTD,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a premier floral and gifting company with a vision to be the leading and most trusted floral and gifting company in the world. Our mission is to inspire, support, and delight our customers when expressing life’s most important sentiments. We provide floral, specialty foods, gift, and related products and services to consumers, retail florists, and other retail locations and companies in need of floral and gifting solutions. Our business uses the highly‑highly recognized FTD® and Interflora® brands, both supported by the iconic Mercury Man® logo. While we operate primarily in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada, and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), and the Republic of Ireland, we have worldwide presence as our Mercury Man logo is displayed in approximately 40,00035,000 floral shops in nearly 150over 125 countries. Our diversified portfolio of brands also includesProFlowers®, ProPlants®, Shari’s Berries®, Personal Creations®, RedEnvelope®, Flying Flowers®, Flowers Direct®, Ink CardsTMCards™, Postagram,Postagram™, and Gifts.comTMGifts.com™. While floral arrangements and plants are our primary offerings, we also market and sell gift items, including gourmet‑dippedgourmet-dipped berries and other sweets,specialty foods, personalized gifts, gift baskets, wine and champagne, jewelry, and spa products.

Reportable Segments

We report our business operations in four reportable segments: Consumer, Provide Commerce, Consumer, Florist, and International.

Through our Provide Commerce segment, we are a leading direct marketer of floral and gift products for consumers, including food gifts, personalized gifts, and other gifting products, primarily in the U.S. Our Provide Commerce segment operates primarily through our www.proflowers.com, www.berries.com, www.personalcreations.com, www.proplants.com, and www.gifts.com websites, associated mobile sites and applications, and various telephone numbers. Through our Consumer segment, we are a leading direct marketer of floral and gift products for consumers, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. Our Consumer segment operates primarily through the www.ftd.com website, associated mobile sites, and the 1‑800‑SEND‑FTD1-800-SEND-FTD telephone number. Through our Provide Commerce segment, we are a leading direct marketer of floral and gift products for consumers, including specialty foods, personalized gifts, and other gifting products, primarily in the U.S. Our Provide Commerce segment operates primarily through the www.proflowers.com, www.berries.com,  www.personalcreations.com, www.proplants.com, and www.gifts.com websites, associated mobile sites and applications, and various telephone numbers. Through our Florist segment, we are a leading provider of products and services to our floral network members, whichincluding services that enable our floral network members to send, receive, and deliver floral orders. Floral network members include traditional retail florists, andas well as other non‑floristnon-florist retail locations, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. WeOur Florist segment also provideprovides products and services to other companies in need of floral and gifting solutions. Our International segment consists of Interflora, which operates primarily in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland. Interflora is a leadingpremier direct marketer of floral and gift products, for consumers and operates primarily through itsthe www.interflora.co.uk, www.flyingflowers.co.uk, and www.interflora.iewww.flowersdirect.co.uk websites, associated mobile sites and applications, and various telephone numbers. Interflora also provides products and services to floral network members other retailers, and to other companies in need of floral and gifting solutions.

Table of Contents

KEY BUSINESS METRICS

We review a number of key business metrics to help us monitor our performance and trends affecting our segments, and to develop forecasts and budgets. These key metrics include the following:

Segment operating income.  Our chief operating decision maker uses segment operating income to evaluate the performance of our business segments and to make decisions about allocating resources among segments. Segment operating income is operating income excluding depreciation, amortization, litigation and dispute settlement charges and gains, transaction‑relatedtransaction-related costs, restructuring and other exit costs, and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. Stock‑basedIn addition, stock-based and incentive compensation and general corporate expenses are not allocated to the segments. Segment operating income is prior to intersegment eliminations and excludes other income income/(expense), net. See Note 2—“Segment Information” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10‑Q10-Q for a reconciliation of segment operating income to consolidated operating income and consolidated income before income taxes.

Consumer orders.  We monitor the number of consumer orders for floral, gift, and related products during a given period. Consumer orders are individual units delivered during the period that were originated in the U.S. and Canada, primarily from the www.ftd.com,  www.proflowers.com,  www.berries.com, and www.personalcreations.com websites, associated mobile sites and applications, the 1‑800‑SEND‑FTD telephone number and various other telephone numbers; and in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland, primarily through the www.interflora.co.uk, www.flyingflowers.co.uk, and

25


Table of Contents

www.interflora.ieour consumer websites, associated mobile sites and applications, and various telephone numbers. The number of consumer orders is not adjusted for non‑deliverednon-delivered orders that are refunded on or after the scheduled delivery date. Orders originating with a florist or other retail location for delivery to consumers are not included as part of this number.

Average order value.  We monitor the average value for consumer orders delivered in a given period, which we refer to as the average order value. Average order value represents the average amount received for consumer orders delivered during a period. The average order value of consumer orders within our Consumer, Provide Commerce, Consumer, and International segments is tracked in their local currency, the U.S. Dollar (“USD”) for both the ConsumerProvide Commerce and Provide CommerceConsumer segments and the British Pound (“GBP”) for the International segment. The local currency amounts received for the International segment are then translated into USD at the average currency exchange rate for the period. Average order value includes merchandise revenues and shipping or service fees paid by the consumer, less discounts and refunds (net of refund‑relatedrefund-related fees charged to floral network members).

Average revenues per member.  We monitor average revenues per member for our floral network members in the Florist segment. Average revenues per member represents the average revenues earned from a member of our floral network during a period. Revenues include services revenues and products revenues, but exclude revenues from sales to non‑members.non-members. Floral network members include our retail florists and other non‑floristnon-florist retail locations who offer floral and gifting solutions. Average revenues per member is calculated by dividing Florist segment revenues for the period, excluding sales to non‑members,non-members, by the average number of floral network members for the period.

Table of Contents

The table below sets forth, for the periods presented, our consolidated revenues, segment revenues, segment operating income, consumer orders, average order values, average revenues per member, and average currency exchange rates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

$  

%  

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

$  

%  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except for percentages, average order values,

 

 

average revenues per member, and exchange rates)

 

Consolidated:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated revenues

 

$

173,154

 

$

188,519

 

$

(15,365)
(8)

%

 

$

842,327

 

$

922,101

 

$

(79,774)
(9)

%

Consumer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment revenues(a)

 

$

51,298

 

$

59,573

 

$

(8,275)
(14)

%

 

$

220,887

 

$

245,295

 

$

(24,408)
(10)

%

Segment operating income

 

$

5,059

 

$

9,641

 

$

(4,582)
(48)

%

 

$

22,457

 

$

27,995

 

$

(5,538)
(20)

%

Consumer orders

 

 

645

 

 

706

 

 

(61)
(9)

%

 

 

2,890

 

 

3,217

 

 

(327)
(10)

%

Average order value

 

$

74.58

 

$

74.01

 

$

0.57
1

%

 

$

72.04

 

$

70.86

 

$

1.18
2

%

Provide Commerce:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment revenues(a)

 

$

57,112

 

$

60,465

 

$

(3,353)
(6)

%

 

$

390,751

 

$

440,249

 

$

(49,498)
(11)

%

Segment operating income/(loss)

 

$

(1,847)

 

$

(5,679)

 

$

3,832
67

%

 

$

27,406

 

$

29,307

 

$

(1,901)
(6)

%

Consumer orders

 

 

1,115

 

 

1,216

 

 

(101)
(8)

%

 

 

7,780

 

 

8,801

 

 

(1,021)
(12)

%

Average order value

 

$

49.78

 

$

48.63

 

$

1.15
2

%

 

$

49.48

 

$

49.60

 

$

(0.12)
(0)

%

Florist:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment revenues(a)

 

$

36,605

 

$

36,753

 

$

(148)
(0)

%

 

$

126,955

 

$

125,922

 

$

1,033
1

%

Segment operating income

 

$

11,362

 

$

10,067

 

$

1,295
13

%

 

$

36,722

 

$

36,327

 

$

395
1

%

Average revenues per member

 

$

3,233

 

$

3,064

 

$

169
6

%

 

$

10,874

 

$

10,144

 

$

730
7

%

International:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Segment revenues (in USD)

 

$

31,601

 

$

35,538

 

$

(3,937)
(11)

%

 

$

117,697

 

$

124,700

 

$

(7,003)
(6)

%

Segment revenues (in GBP)

 

£

24,045

 

£

22,941

 

£

1,104
5

%

 

£

84,133

 

£

81,554

 

£

2,579
3

%

Segment operating income (in USD)

 

$

4,130

 

$

3,460

 

$

670
19

%

 

$

16,158

 

$

15,260

 

$

898
6

%

Consumer orders

 

 

560

 

 

546

 

 

14
3

%

 

 

1,979

 

 

1,972

 

 

7
0

%

Average order value (in USD)

 

$

46.32

 

$

53.45

 

$

(7.13)
(13)

%

 

$

48.90

 

$

51.89

 

$

(2.99)
(6)

%

Average order value (in GBP)

 

£

35.27

 

£

34.51

 

£

0.76
2

%

 

£

34.98

 

£

33.95

 

£

1.03
3

%

Average currency exchange rate: GBP to USD

 

 

1.31

 

 

1.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.40

 

 

1.53

 

 

 

 

 


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
 2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
 (in thousands, except for percentages, average order values, average revenues per member, and exchange rates)
Consolidated: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Consolidated revenues$328,146
 $338,239
 $(10,093) (3)% $644,639
 $668,453
 $(23,814) (4)%
                
Provide Commerce: 
  
  
  
      
  
Segment revenues(a)
$179,691
 $176,542
 $3,149
 2 % $335,559
 $333,639
 $1,920
 1 %
Segment operating income$14,543
 $22,177
 $(7,634) (34)% $27,990
 $29,253
 $(1,263) (4)%
Consumer orders3,562
 3,542
 20
 1 % 6,468
 6,665
 (197) (3)%
Average order value$49.86
 $49.22
 $0.64
 1 % $51.26
 $49.44
 $1.82
 4 %
                
Consumer: 
  
  
  
      
  
Segment revenues(a)
$80,113
 $90,876
 $(10,763) (12)% $152,917
 $169,483
 $(16,566) (10)%
Segment operating income$6,577
 $10,878
 $(4,301) (40)% $12,237
 $17,307
 $(5,070) (29)%
Consumer orders1,092
 1,223
 (131) (11)% 2,033
 2,245
 (212) (9)%
Average order value$69.17
 $70.14
 $(0.97) (1)% $70.97
 $71.26
 $(0.29)  %
                
Florist: 
  
  
  
      
  
Segment revenues(a)
$44,090
 $43,358
 $732
 2 % $90,596
 $90,350
 $246
  %
Segment operating income$12,248
 $12,550
 $(302) (2)% $26,202
 $25,360
 $842
 3 %
Average revenues per member$3,981
 $3,742
 $239
 6 % $8,122
 $7,631
 $491
 6 %
                
International: 
  
  
  
      
  
Segment revenues (in USD)$29,201
 $33,105
 $(3,904) (12)% $74,938
 $85,482
 $(10,544) (12)%
Segment revenues (in GBP)£22,798
 £23,053
 £(255) (1)% £59,679
 £59,617
 £62
  %
Segment operating income (in USD)$3,066
 $3,963
 $(897) (23)% $8,598
 $11,380
 $(2,782) (24)%
Consumer orders532
 541
 (9) (2)% 1,374
 1,419
 (45) (3)%
Average order value (in USD)$45.57
 $49.90
 $(4.33) (9)% $44.91
 $49.49
 $(4.58) (9)%
Average order value (in GBP)£35.61
 £34.77
 £0.84
 2 % £35.79
 £34.53
 £1.26
 4 %
Average currency exchange rate:
GBP to USD
1.28
 1.44
  
  
 1.26
 1.43
  
  

(a)

Segment revenues are prior to intersegment eliminations. See Note 2—“Segment Information” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10‑Q10-Q for a reconciliation of segment revenues to consolidated revenues.

26


Table of Contents


CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial data. The information contained in the table below should be read in conjunction with “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” included in this Item 2, and the condensed consolidated financial statementsCondensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10‑Q.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

$  

    

%  

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

$  

    

%  

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Revenues

 

$

173,154

 

$

188,519

 

$

(15,365)

 

(8)

%

 

$

842,327

 

$

922,101

 

$

(79,774)

 

(9)

%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

 

108,243

 

 

118,267

 

 

(10,024)

 

(8)

%

 

 

532,234

 

 

582,719

 

 

(50,485)

 

(9)

%

Sales and marketing

 

 

35,012

 

 

38,249

 

 

(3,237)

 

(8)

%

 

 

168,885

 

 

185,299

 

 

(16,414)

 

(9)

%

General and administrative

 

 

25,745

 

 

30,252

 

 

(4,507)

 

(15)

%

 

 

83,378

 

 

92,750

 

 

(9,372)

 

(10)

%

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

15,240

 

 

15,317

 

 

(77)

 

(1)

%

 

 

45,873

 

 

46,054

 

 

(181)

 

 —

%

Restructuring and other exit costs

 

 

612

 

 

1,495

 

 

(883)

 

(59)

%

 

 

2,230

 

 

5,907

 

 

(3,677)

 

(62)

%  

Total operating expenses

 

 

184,852

 

 

203,580

 

 

(18,728)

 

(9)

%

 

 

832,600

 

 

912,729

 

 

(80,129)

 

(9)

%  

Operating income/(loss)

 

 

(11,698)

 

 

(15,061)

 

 

3,363

 

22

%

 

 

9,727

 

 

9,372

 

 

355

 

4

%

Interest expense, net

 

 

(2,294)

 

 

(2,328)

 

 

34

 

1

%

 

 

(6,863)

 

 

(6,995)

 

 

132

 

2

%

Other income/(expense), net

 

 

(9)

 

 

131

 

 

(140)

 

(107)

%

 

 

1,804

 

 

557

 

 

1,247

 

n/m

%  

Income/(loss) before income taxes

 

 

(14,001)

 

 

(17,258)

 

 

3,257

 

19

%

 

 

4,668

 

 

2,934

 

 

1,734

 

59

%

Provision/(benefit) for income taxes

 

 

(4,028)

 

 

(779)

 

 

(3,249)

 

n/m

%

 

 

447

 

 

(440)

 

 

887

 

n/m

%  

Net income/(loss)

 

$

(9,973)

 

$

(16,479)

 

$

6,506

 

39

%

 

$

4,221

 

$

3,374

 

$

847

 

25

%  

10-Q.

n/m = not meaningful

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
  2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
  (in thousands, except percentages)
Revenues $328,146
 $338,239
 $(10,093) (3)% $644,639
 $668,453
 $(23,814) (4)%
Operating expenses:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Cost of revenues 203,179
 209,744
 (6,565) (3)% 399,553
 423,510
 (23,957) (6)%
Sales and marketing 76,224
 65,957
 10,267
 16 % 145,120
 133,873
 11,247
 8 %
General and administrative 27,039
 28,389
 (1,350) (5)% 55,794
 58,133
 (2,339) (4)%
Amortization of intangible assets 3,819
 15,217
 (11,398) (75)% 7,639
 30,633
 (22,994) (75)%
Restructuring and other exit costs 136
 1,185
 (1,049) (89)% 944
 1,618
 (674) (42)%
Total operating expenses 310,397
 320,492
 (10,095) (3)% 609,050
 647,767
 (38,717) (6)%
Operating income 17,749
 17,747
 2
  % 35,589
 20,686
 14,903
 72 %
Interest expense, net (2,440) (2,255) (185) (8)% (4,713) (4,569) (144) (3)%
Other income, net 223
 4
 219
 NM
 198
 1,813
 (1,615) (89)%
Income before income taxes 15,532
 15,496
 36
  % 31,074
 17,930
 13,144
 73 %
Provision for income taxes 5,816
 3,721
 2,095
 56 % 12,335
 4,404
 7,931
 180 %
Net income $9,716
 $11,775
 $(2,059) (17)% $18,739
 $13,526
 $5,213
 39 %
Consolidated Revenues

Consolidated revenues decreased $15.4$10.1 million, or 3%, for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. The decrease in consolidated revenues was primarily due to an $8.3 million decrease in revenues from our Consumer segment,2016, or 2% on a $3.9 million decrease ($1.7 million increase in constant currency) in revenues from our International segment primarily due to strengthening of the USD to GBP exchange rate, a $3.4 million decrease in revenues associated with our Provide Commerce segment, and a $0.1 million decrease in revenues from our Florist segment.currency basis. Foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted revenues by $5.6$3.5 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

Consolidated revenues decreased $79.8 million for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, compared to2017. Excluding the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in consolidatedimpact of foreign currency exchange rates, revenues wasdeclined $6.6 million, primarily due to a $49.5 million decrease in revenues associated with our Provide Commerce segment, a $24.4$10.8 million decrease in revenues from our Consumer segment and a $7.0 million decrease ($4.0 million increase in constant currency) in revenues from our International segment primarily due to strengthening of the USD to GBP exchange rate, partially offset by a $1.0$3.1 million increase in revenues from our FloristProvide segment.

Consolidated revenues decreased $23.8 million, or 4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, or 2% on a constant currency basis. Foreign currency exchange rates unfavorably impacted revenues by $11.0$10.6 million during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.

2017. Excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates, revenues declined $13.2 million, primarily due to a $16.6 million decrease in revenues from our Consumer segment and partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in revenues from our Provide segment.

Consolidated Cost of Revenues

Consolidated cost of revenues decreased $10.0$6.6 million for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The decrease in consolidated cost of revenues was primarily due to a $4.2$6.4 million decrease of costs associated with our Consumer segment, driven by the reduction in revenues, and a $2.5 million decrease ($0.1 million in constant currency) of costs associated with our International segment partially offset by a $2.0 million increase of costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $2.4 million favorable impact on cost of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Consolidated cost of revenues as a percentage of consolidated revenues was 62% for both of the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
Consolidated cost of revenues decreased $24.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a $11.1 million decrease of costs associated with our Consumer segment, a $6.9 million decrease ($0.4 million increase in constant currency) of costs associated with our International segment, and a $6.0 million decrease of costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $7.3 million favorable impact on cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Consolidated cost of revenues as a percentage of consolidated revenues decreased to 62% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from 63% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to lower product costs and improved peak demand inventory management within our Provide Commerce segment.

Consolidated Sales and Marketing
Consolidated sales and marketing expenses increased $10.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an $8.8 million increase of costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment and a $2.6$0.4 million increase of costs associated with our Florist segment. These increases were partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease (increase of $1.2($0.2 million increase in constant currency) of costs associated with our International segment. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $0.5 million favorable impact on sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Consolidated sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, was 23% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 20% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Consolidated sales and marketing expenses increased $11.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an $11.1 million increase of costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease ($0.5 million increase in constant currency) of costs associated with our International segment and a $2.5$0.3 million decrease in costs associated with our Consumer segment, and a $0.5 million decrease inof costs associated with our Florist segment. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $3.8 million favorable impact on cost of revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. Consolidated cost of revenues, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, remained consistent at 63% for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

27


Consolidated cost of revenues decreased $50.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in consolidated cost of revenues was primarily due to a $30.0 million decrease in costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment, a $13.4 million decrease in costs associated with our Consumer segment, a $5.2 million decrease (increase of $2.3 million in constant currency) in costs associated with our International segment, and a $1.8 million decrease in costs associated with our Florist segment. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $7.4 million favorable impact on cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Consolidated cost of revenues, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, remained consistent at 63% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Consolidated Sales and Marketing

Consolidated sales and marketing expenses decreased $3.2 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in consolidated sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to a $1.5 million decrease in costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment, a $1.0 million decrease ($0.4 million in constant currency) in costs associated with our International segment, a $0.5 million decrease in costs associated with our Consumer segment, and a $0.4 million decrease in costs associated with our Florist segment. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $0.6$1.2 million favorable impact on sales and marketing expenses for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2017. Consolidated sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, remained consistent atwas 23% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 20% for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2016.

Consolidated General and Administrative
Consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

Consolidated sales and marketing expenses decreased $16.4 million during the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.2016. The decrease in consolidated sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to a $12.6 million decrease in costs associated with our Provide Commerce segment, a $4.2 million decrease in costs associated with our Consumer segment, and a $1.4 million decrease ($0.2decreases of $1.2 million in constant currency)personnel-related costs, $0.9 million in transaction-related costs, associated with our International segment.$0.7 million in bad debt expense, and $0.5 million in technology costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.9$1.8 million increase in sales and marketing expenses associated with our Florist segment.costs related to corporate strategic planning. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $1.3$0.4 million favorable impact on salesgeneral and marketingadministrative expenses for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016. Consolidated sales and marketing expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, remained consistent at 20% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Consolidated General and Administrative

2017.

Consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased $4.5$2.3 million for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Consolidated general and administrative expenses were lower2016. The decrease was primarily due to a reductiondecreases of $2.0 million in personnel related costs of $3.2 million, which included a decrease in headcount, incentive compensation expense, and stock-based compensation, a $0.5 million decrease in audit, professional fees, and other consulting fees, and a $0.3 million decrease in facility costs. In addition, consolidated bad debt expense, decreased $0.3$1.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

Consolidated general and administrative expenses decreased $9.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Consolidated general and administrative expenses were lower primarily due to a decrease in personnel related costs of $6.0 million, which included a decrease in headcount and incentive compensation expense partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation of $1.5million, a reduction in transaction‑related costs of $4.0million, a reduction in facility costs of $1.1 million, and a reduction in technology costs, of $0.4 million.$0.7 million in personnel-related costs, and $0.6 million in legal expenses. These decreases were partially offset by increasesa $1.8 million increase in bad debtcosts related to corporate strategic planning. Foreign currency exchange rates had a $0.8 million favorable impact on general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization expense of $1.7related to intangible assets decreased $11.4 million and depreciation of $0.7$23.0 million, respectively, for the ninethree and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as certain intangible assets related to the Provide Commerce acquisition were fully amortized at December 31, 2016.

Restructuring and Other Exit Costs

During the quartersthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, we incurred restructuring and other exit costs of $0.6$0.1 million and $1.5$1.2 million, respectively, related to the integration of Provide Commerce and legacy FTD businesses.

respectively. During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, we incurred restructuring and other exit costs of $2.2$0.9 million and $5.9$1.6 million, respectively,respectively. Such restructuring costs were primarily related to the integration of Provide Commerceemployee termination costs and legacy FTD businesses.

facility closure costs.

28

Other Income, net

Other Income/(Expense), net

Other expense,income, net for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 increased $0.2 million from the three months ended June 30, 2016. Other income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased $1.6 million from the six months ended June 30, 2016 was less than $0.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 other income, net was $1.8 million and wasdue primarily related to gains on corporate-owned life insurance policies that were held by Provide Commerce.

realized during the 2016 period.


Provision for Income Taxes

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, we recorded a tax benefit of $4.0 million on a pre‑tax loss of $14.0 million compared to a tax benefit of $0.8 million on pre‑tax loss of $17.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to an expected increase in full year pre-tax income compared to the prior year.

During the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we recorded a tax provision of $0.4$5.8 million on pre‑taxpre-tax income of $4.7$15.5 million compared to a tax benefitprovision of $0.4$3.7 million on pre‑taxpre-tax income of $2.9$15.5 million for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to an expected increase in fullexpected fiscal year pre-tax income over the prior year combined with a higher portion of pre-tax income expected to be earned in higher tax rate jurisdictions as well as a reduction in foreign tax benefits. In addition, tax deficiencies related to vesting of equity awards increased tax expense by $0.5 million. As noted in Note 1—“Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies, and Recent Accounting Pronouncements” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q, ASU 2016-09 was adopted on January 1, 2017. As such, tax deficiencies or excess tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2017 rather than in additional paid-in capital as was previously required.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a tax provision of $12.3 million on pre-tax income of $31.1 million compared to a tax provision of $4.4 million on pre-tax income of $17.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The effective tax rate increased due to an increase in expected fiscal year pre-tax income over the prior year.

year combined with a higher portion of pre-tax income expected to be earned in higher tax rate jurisdictions as well as a reduction in foreign tax benefits. In addition, tax deficiencies related to vesting of equity awards increased tax expense by $1.4 million. As noted in Note 1—“Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies, and Recent Accounting Pronouncements” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q, ASU 2016-09 was adopted on January 1, 2017. As such, tax deficiencies or excess tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017 rather than in additional paid-in capital as was previously required.

BUSINESS SEGMENT OPERATING RESULTS

The Company reports its business in four reportable segments: Consumer, Provide Commerce, Consumer, Florist, and International. Segment operating income is operating income excluding depreciation, amortization, litigation and dispute settlement charges orand gains, transaction‑relatedtransaction-related costs, restructuring and other exit costs, and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets. Stock‑basedIn addition, stock-based and incentive compensation and general corporate expenses are not allocated to the segments. Segment operating income is prior to intersegment eliminations and excludes other income,income/(expense), net.

29



PROVIDE COMMERCE SEGMENT
  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
  2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
  
(in thousands, except percentages and
average order values)
Segment revenues $179,691
 $176,542
 $3,149
 2 % $335,559
 $333,639
 $1,920
 1 %
Segment operating income $14,543
 $22,177
 $(7,634) (34)% $27,990
 $29,253
 $(1,263) (4)%
Key metrics and other
financial data:
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Consumer orders 3,562
 3,542
 20
 1 % 6,468
 6,665
 (197) (3)%
Average order value $49.86
 $49.22
 $0.64
 1 % $51.26
 $49.44
 $1.82
 4 %
Segment operating margin 8% 13%  
  
 8% 9%  
  
Provide Commerce Segment Revenues
Provide Commerce segment revenues increased $3.1 million, or 2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016, as a result of a 1% increase in average order value and a 1% increase in consumer order volume. The increase in average order value was due to favorable product mix and fewer promotional discounts on products. During the second quarter of 2017, volume increased due to the shift of the Easter holiday to the second quarter from the first quarter of 2016 which was partially offset by lower volume related to Mother’s Day and non-holiday sales. Revenues for the Personal Creations and Gourmet Foods businesses increased 15% and 4%, respectively, while revenues for the ProFlowers business declined 2% for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Provide Commerce segment revenues increased $1.9 million, or 1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, as a result of a 4% increase in average order value partially offset by a 3% decrease in consumer order volume. The increase in average order value was due to favorable product mix and lower discounting on products. Revenues for the Gourmet Foods business increased 9% while the ProFlowers and Personal Creations businesses’ revenues declined 3% and 2%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Provide Commerce Segment Operating Income
Provide Commerce segment operating income decreased $7.6 million, or 34%, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in revenues previously discussed was more than offset by increased operating expenses of $10.8 million. Cost of revenues increased $2.0 million primarily due to higher sales and increased shipping costs. Sales and marketing expenses increased $8.8 million primarily related to additional marketing spend to drive increased customer acquisition and retention. Provide Commerce segment operating margin decreased to 8% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 13% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Provide Commerce segment operating income decreased $1.3 million, or 4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in revenues previously discussed was more than offset by increased operating expenses of $3.2 million. Cost of revenues decreased $6.0 million due to lower order volume, shifts to lower cost products, and improved peak demand inventory management. These decreases were partially offset by increased seasonal employee costs and shipping costs. General and administrative expenses also decreased by $1.9 million primarily due to lower personnel-related costs and legal and settlement-related expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased $11.1 million primarily related to the second quarter additional marketing spend to drive increased customer acquisition and retention. Provide Commerce segment operating margin decreased to 8% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 9% for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

CONSUMER SEGMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

 

2015

 

$  

    

%  

 

    

2016

    

2015

 

$  

    

%  

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages and average order values)

 

Segment revenues

 

$

51,298

 

$

59,573

 

$

(8,275)

 

(14)

%

 

$

220,887

 

$

245,295

 

$

(24,408)

 

(10)

%

Segment operating income

 

$

5,059

 

$

9,641

 

$

(4,582)

 

(48)

%

 

$

22,457

 

$

27,995

 

$

(5,538)

 

(20)

%

Key metrics and other financial data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer orders

 

 

645

 

 

706

 

 

(61)

 

(9)

%

 

 

2,890

 

 

3,217

 

 

(327)

 

(10)

%

Average order value

 

$

74.58

 

$

74.01

 

$

0.57

 

1

%

 

$

72.04

 

$

70.86

 

$

1.18

 

2

%

Segment operating margin

 

 

10

%

 

16

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

%

 

11

%

 

 

 

 

 

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
  2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
  
(in thousands, except percentages and
average order values)
Segment revenues $80,113
 $90,876
 $(10,763) (12)% $152,917
 $169,483
 $(16,566) (10)%
Segment operating income $6,577
 $10,878
 $(4,301) (40)% $12,237
 $17,307
 $(5,070) (29)%
Key metrics and other
financial data:
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Consumer orders 1,092
 1,223
 (131) (11)% 2,033
 2,245
 (212) (9)%
Average order value $69.17
 $70.14
 $(0.97) (1)% $70.97
 $71.26
 $(0.29)  %
Segment operating margin 8% 12%  
  
 8% 10%  
  
Consumer Segment Revenues

Consumer segment revenues decreased $8.3$10.8 million, or 12%, for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 driven by an 11% decrease in order volume combined with a 1% decrease in average order value. The decrease in order volume was primarily related to a decrease in partner programs, including group buying, sympathy, and airlines, and was slightly offset by the shift of the Easter holiday into the second quarter ended September 30, 2015of 2017 from the first quarter of 2016. The decrease in partaverage order value was primarily due to the $4.1 millionlower service fee rates related to Mother’s Day holiday promotions and an increase in breakage revenue recorded in the third quarter of 2015. Excluding this breakage revenue, consumerorders through our Gold Program, which is a membership program that offers reduced service/shipping fees. These decreases were partially offset by lower refunds.
Consumer segment revenuerevenues decreased $4.2$16.6 million, or 8%10%, for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152016 driven by a 9% decrease in order volume partially offset by an increasecombined with a slight decrease in average order value. The decrease in order volume was primarily related to a decrease in partner programs, including group buying, sympathy, and airlines. The decrease in average order value of 1%.

Consumer segment revenues decreased $24.4 million, or 10%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, comparedwas primarily due to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily driven by a 10% decreaselower service fee rates related to Mother’s Day holiday promotions and an increase in order volume,Gold Program orders and was partially offset by an increase in average order value of 2%. In 2016, consumer order volume was negatively impacted by the Sunday timing of the Valentine’s Day holiday, which worsened from the Saturday day placement in 2015,favorable product mix and a decline in certain corporate partner programs such as sympathy and group buying. In addition, revenue was lower as compared to the prior year period due to the recognition of $4.1 million of breakage revenue in the third quarter of 2015.

refunds.

Consumer Segment Operating Income

Consumer segment operating income decreased $4.6$4.3 million for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015 in part2016 due to the $4.1 milliondecrease in breakage revenue recorded in the third quarter of 2015. Excluding this breakage, revenue decreased $4.2 millionrevenues as previously described above, partially offset by a $3.7decrease of $6.4 million in cost of revenues. The decrease in operating expenses. Costcost of revenues decreased $2.5 millionwas primarily driven by athe decrease in product and shipping costs associated with lower order volume. Other operatingSales and marketing expenses increased $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. General and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to reduced spending associated with lower order volume and other operating expense savings.$0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from the three months ended June 30, 2016. Consumer segment operating margin remains consistent at 10%was 8% for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to 12% for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015 excluding the impact of the breakage in 2015.

2016.

Consumer segment operating income decreased $5.5$5.1 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015 as revenue decreased $24.4 million as described above, offset in part by an $18.9 million2016 due to the decrease in operating expenses. Costrevenues as previously described partially offset by a decrease of $11.1 million in cost of revenues. The decrease in cost of revenues decreased $13.4 millionwas primarily driven by athe decrease in product and shipping costs associated with the lower order volume. Other operatingSales and marketing expenses were flat for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. General and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to reduced spending associated with lower order volume, lower fixed costs in$0.4 million for the customer service area, and other operating expense savings.six months ended June 30, 2017 from the six months ended June 30, 2016. Consumer segment operating margin decreasedwas 8% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 10% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 compared to 11% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

2016.

30


PROVIDE COMMERCE

FLORIST SEGMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

 

2015

 

$  

  

%  

 

  

2016

 

2015

 

$  

  

%  

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages and average order values)

 

Segment revenues

 

$

57,112

 

$

60,465

 

$

(3,353)

 

(6)

%

 

$

390,751

 

$

440,249

 

$

(49,498)

 

(11)

%

Segment operating income/(loss)

 

$

(1,847)

 

$

(5,679)

 

$

3,832

 

67

%

 

$

27,406

 

$

29,307

 

$

(1,901)

 

(6)

%

Key metrics and other financial data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer orders

 

 

1,115

 

 

1,216

 

 

(101)

 

(8)

%

 

 

7,780

 

 

8,801

 

 

(1,021)

 

(12)

%

Average order value

 

$

49.78

 

$

48.63

 

$

1.15

 

2

%

 

$

49.48

 

$

49.60

 

$

(0.12)

 

(0)

%

Segment operating margin

 

 

(3)

%

 

(9)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

%

 

7

%

 

 

 

 

 

Provide Commerce Segment Revenues

Provide Commerce segment revenues decreased $3.4 million, or 6%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015, primarily driven by an 8% decrease in consumer order volume, partially offset by a 2% increase in average order value. The revenue decline is in part the result of a 12% decline in the ProFlowers business and a 2% decline in the Gourmet Foods business partially offset by an 11% growth in revenue in the Personal Creations business for the quarter.

Provide Commerce segment revenues decreased $49.5 million, or 11%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily driven by a 12% decrease in consumer order volume. The revenue decline was largely due to an 18% decline in the ProFlowers business. Revenues for the Gourmet Foods business declined 3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily driven by declines in the Valentine’s Day holiday period. Both ProFlowers and Gourmet Foods revenues were negatively impacted by the Sunday timing of the Valentine’s Day holiday, which worsened from the Saturday day placement in 2015. Personal Creations revenue increased 9% for the period.

Provide Commerce Segment Operating Income/(Loss)

Provide Commerce segment operating loss improved by $3.8 million, or 67%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015. Revenues decreased $3.4 million, which was offset in part by a decrease in operating expenses of $5.7 million as well as other adjustments. The decrease in operating expenses was due primarily to reductions in product and shipping costs, partially offset by the higher costs associated with the mix of shipping methods, and lower marketing and selling costs associated with the lower order volume during the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

Provide Commerce segment operating income decreased $1.9 million, or 6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Revenues decreased $49.5 million, which was offset in part by a decrease in operating expenses of $47.6 million.  The decrease in operating expenses was due primarily to reductions in product and shipping costs, partially offset by the higher costs associated with the mix of shipping methods, lower marketing and selling costs, and lower personnel-related costs, which are both associated with the lower order volume during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Further, segment operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 benefited from the second quarter 2015 actions associated with the restructuring of the Gifts.com business and the closure of the Kalla business as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Provide Commerce segment operating margin remained consistent at 7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

31


  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
  2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
  
(in thousands, except percentages and
average revenues per member)
Segment revenues $44,090
 $43,358
 $732
 2 % $90,596
 $90,350
 $246
 %
Segment operating income $12,248
 $12,550
 $(302) (2)% $26,202
 $25,360
 $842
 3%
Key metrics and other
financial data:
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Average revenues per member $3,981
 $3,742
 $239
 6 % $8,122
 $7,631
 $491
 6%
Segment operating margin 28% 29%  
  
 29% 28%  
  

FLORIST SEGMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

 

2015

 

$  

    

%  

 

    

2016

 

2015

 

$  

    

%  

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages and average revenues per member)

 

Segment revenues

 

$

36,605

 

$

36,753

 

$

(148)

 

(0)

%

 

$

126,955

 

$

125,922

 

$

1,033

 

1

%

Segment operating income

 

$

11,362

 

$

10,067

 

$

1,295

 

13

%

 

$

36,722

 

$

36,327

 

$

395

 

1

%

Key metrics and other financial data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average revenues per member

 

$

3,233

 

$

3,064

 

$

169

 

6

%

 

$

10,874

 

$

10,144

 

$

730

 

7

%

Segment operating margin

 

 

31

%

 

27

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

%

 

29

%

 

 

 

 

 

Florist Segment Revenues

Florist segment revenues for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 were consistent with2017 increased $0.7 million, or 2%, compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Services revenues increased $0.2 million due to a $0.5 million increase in subscription and other services revenues partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in order-related revenues. Product revenues decreased $0.4 million2016 primarily due to a decrease in sales of fresh flowers, technology systems, and other products. Average revenues per member increased 6% for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

Florist segment revenues increased $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Services revenues increased $2.1 million due to a $1.8 millionan increase in order-relatedproduct revenues and a $0.3 million increase in subscription and other services revenues.Product revenues decreased $1.1 million primarily due to a decrease infrom the sales of fresh flowers. Average revenues per member increased 7%6% for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.

2016.

Florist segment revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was relatively flat at $90.6 million when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. Products revenues increased $0.9 million, or 3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in the sales of fresh flowers. Services revenues decreased $0.6 million, or 1%, primarily due to lower order-related revenues partially offset by increases in subscription and other services revenues. Average revenues per member increased 6% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Florist Segment Operating Income

Florist segment operating income decreased $0.3 million, or 2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to a $1.0 million increase in operating expenses partially offset by the increase in revenues as previously described. Operating expenses increased primarily due to an $0.8 million increase in cost of revenues related to increased volume of fresh flower sales and a $0.4 million increase in sales and marketing expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.2 million for three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Florist segment operating margin decreased to 28% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 29% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Florist segment operating income increased $1.3$0.8 million, or 13%3%, for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016 primarily due to a $0.6 million decrease in operating expenses. Operating expenses decreased primarily due to a $2.0 million decrease in bad debt expense. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in cost of revenues related to increased volume of fresh flower sales. The Florist segment operating margin increased to 31% for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to 27% for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. Cost of revenues decreased $0.5 million, primarily driven by a decrease in technology costs and continued cost efficiencies realized across the business. Other operating expenses decreased $0.5 million, primarily driven by a decrease in bad debt expense and lower personnel costs.

Florist segment operating income increased $0.4 million, or 1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as the revenue increase of $1.0 million was offset by a $0.6 million increase in operating expenses. Cost of revenues decreased $1.8 million, primarily driven by the decrease in sales of fresh flowers and continued cost efficiencies realized across the business. Sales and marketing expenses increased $0.9 million associated with the increase in order-related revenues. General and administrative expenses increased $1.6 million primarily due to an increase in bad debt expense related to one member partially offset by lower personnel costs. The Florist segment operating margin remained consistent at 29% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 compared to 28% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.

2016.

32




INTERNATIONAL SEGMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

    

2016

 

2015

 

$  

    

%  

 

    

2016

 

2015

 

$  

    

%  

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages, average order values, and exchange rates)

 

Segment revenues (in USD)

 

$

31,601

 

$

35,538

 

$

(3,937)

 

(11)

%

 

$

117,697

 

$

124,700

 

$

(7,003)

 

(6)

%

Impact of foreign currency

 

 

5,659

 

 

 —

 

 

5,659

 

 

 

 

 

10,989

 

 

 —

 

 

10,989

 

 

 

Segment revenues (in constant currency)(1)

 

$

37,260

 

$

35,538

 

$

1,722

 

5

%

 

$

128,686

 

$

124,700

 

$

3,986

 

3

%

Segment revenues (in GBP)

 

£

24,045

 

£

22,941

 

£

1,104

 

5

%

 

£

84,133

 

£

81,554

 

£

2,579

 

3

%

Segment operating income (in USD)

 

$

4,130

 

$

3,460

 

$

670

 

19

%

 

$

16,158

 

$

15,260

 

$

898

 

6

%

Impact of foreign currency

 

 

742

 

 

 —

 

 

742

 

 

 

 

 

1,477

 

 

 —

 

 

1,477

 

 

 

Segment operating income (in constant currency)(1)

 

$

4,872

 

$

3,460

 

$

1,412

 

41

%

 

$

17,635

 

$

15,260

 

$

2,375

 

16

%

Key metrics and other financial data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer orders

 

 

560

 

 

546

 

 

14

 

3

%

 

 

1,979

 

 

1,972

 

 

7

 

0

%

Average order value (in USD)

 

$

46.32

 

$

53.45

 

$

(7.13)

 

(13)

%

 

$

48.90

 

$

51.89

 

$

(2.99)

 

(6)

%

Average order value (in GBP)

 

£

35.27

 

£

34.51

 

£

0.76

 

2

%

 

£

34.98

 

£

33.95

 

£

1.03

 

3

%

Segment operating margin

 

 

13

%

 

10

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

%

 

12

%

 

 

 

 

 

Average currency exchange rate: GBP to USD           

 

 

1.31

 

 

1.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.40

 

 

1.53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
 2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
 (in thousands, except percentages, average order values, and exchange rates)
Segment revenues (in USD)$29,201
 $33,105
 $(3,904) (12)% $74,938
 $85,482
 $(10,544) (12)%
Impact of foreign currency3,485
 
 3,485
  
 10,581
 
 10,581
  
Segment revenues (in constant currency)(a)
$32,686
 $33,105
 $(419) (1)% $85,519
 $85,482
 $37
  %
Segment revenues (in GBP)£22,798
 £23,053
 £(255) (1)% £59,679
 £59,617
 £62
  %
Segment operating income
(in USD)
$3,066
 $3,963
 $(897) (23)% $8,598
 $11,380
 $(2,782) (24)%
Impact of foreign currency322
 
 322
  
 1,219
 
 1,219
  
Segment operating income (in constant currency)(a)
$3,388
 $3,963
 $(575) (15)% $9,817
 $11,380
 $(1,563) (14)%
Key metrics and other financial data: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Consumer orders532
 541
 (9) (2)% 1,374
 1,419
 (45) (3)%
Average order value (in USD)$45.57
 $49.90
 $(4.33) (9)% $44.91
 $49.49
 $(4.58) (9)%
Average order value (in GBP)£35.61
 £34.77
 £0.84
 2 % £35.79
 £34.53
 £1.26
 4 %
Segment operating margin10% 12%  
  
 11% 13%  
  
Average currency exchange rate: GBP to USD1.28
 1.44
  
  
 1.26
 1.43
  
  

(1)

(a)

USD at prior year foreign currency exchange rate.

We present certain results from our International segment on a constant currency basis. Constant currency information permits comparison of results between periods as if foreign currency exchange rates had remained constant period‑over‑period.period-over-period. Our International segment operates principally in the U.K. We calculate constant currency by applying the foreign currency exchange rate for the prior period to the local currency results for the current period.

International Segment Revenues

International segment revenues decreased $3.9 million, or 11%12%, (increased $1.7($0.4 million, or 5%1%, in constant currency) for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. The increasedecrease in revenues in constant currency was primarily due to an increasea decrease in order volume of 3%,2% partially offset by an increase in average order value of 2%, and an increase in revenues from the sales of wholesale flowers.

.

International segment revenues decreased $7.0$10.5 million, or 6%12%, (increased $4.0 million, or 3%,(flat in constant currency) for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. The increase in revenues2016. Revenues in constant currency was primarily due towere favorably impacted by an increase in average order value of 4% and increases in services revenues and products revenues from sales of wholesale flowers. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in order volume of 3%.

International Segment Operating Income

International segment operating income increased $0.7decreased $0.9 million, or 19%23%, ($1.40.6 million, or 41%15%, in constant currency) for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. International segment operating margin increased to 13% for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to 10%2016. The decrease in the quarter ended September 30, 2015. Revenues decreased $3.9 million (increased $1.7 million in constant currency) which were more thanrevenues as previously described was partially offset by a decrease indecreased operating expenses of $4.6$3.0 million ($0.3(increased $0.2 million increase in constant currency). Cost of revenues decreased $2.6$2.5 million ($1.20.1 million increase in constant currency). Sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.0$0.3 million ($0.4(increased $0.2 million in constant currency). The decrease in constant currency was primarily due to lower brand and direct marketing costs as well as lower personnel-related costs. General and administrative expenses decreased $1.0$0.2 million ($0.6(increased $0.1 million in constant currency) driven by lower legal costs offset in part by an increase in technology costs.

International segment operating income increased $0.9 million, or 6%, ($2.4 million, or 16%, in constant currency), for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.. International segment operating margin increaseddecreased to 14%10% for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to 12% for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. Revenues2016.

International segment operating income decreased $7.0$2.8 million, (increased $4.0or 24%, ($1.6 million, or 14%, in constant currency), which were more than for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease in revenues as previously described was partially offset by a decrease indecreased operating expenses of $7.9$7.8 million ($1.6(increased $1.6 million increase in constant currency). Cost of revenues decreased $5.2$6.9 million ($2.3(increased $0.4 million increase in constant currency). Sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.4$0.7 million ($0.2(increased $0.5 million in constant currency). General and administrative

expenses decreased $0.1 million (increased $0.7 million in constant currency). International segment operating margin decreased to 11% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 13% for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

33


Table of Contents

expenses decreased $1.3 million ($0.5 million in constant currency) driven by a decrease in legal costs offset in part by an increase in technology costs.


UNALLOCATED EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

September 30,

 

Change

 

 

 

2016

    

2015

    

$

    

%

 

    

2016

    

2015

    

$

    

%

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

Unallocated expenses

 

$

9,416

 

$

11,198

 

$

(1,782)

 

(16)

%

 

$

29,514

 

$

36,252

 

$

(6,738)

 

(19)

%

  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Change Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Change
  2017 2016 $ % 2017 2016 $   %  
  (in thousands, except percentages)
Unallocated expenses $9,400
 $10,582
 $(1,182) (11)% $20,855
 $20,098
 $757
 4%
Unallocated expenses include various corporate costs, such as executive management, corporate finance, legal, and certain human resourceslegal costs. In addition, unallocated expenses include stock‑basedstock-based and incentive compensation, for all eligible Company employees, restructuring and other exit costs, transaction‑relatedtransaction-related costs, and litigation and dispute settlement charges and gains.

Unallocated expenses decreased $1.8$1.2 million for the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quarterthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. The2016. This decrease in unallocated expenses was primarily due to a $1.6decreases of $1.7 million decrease in personnel-related expenses, $1.0 million in restructuring costs, which included lower incentive compensation accruals and stock-based compensation. Partially offsetting this reduction was$0.9 million in transaction-related costs. These decreases were partially offset by $1.8 million costs related to corporate strategic planning and a $0.9$0.7 million increase in litigation and dispute settlement charges (net of insurance recoveries) incurred duringprofessional fees.
Unallocated expenses increased $0.8 million for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

Unallocated expenses decreased $6.7 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in unallocated expenses2016. This increase was primarily due to a decrease in transaction-related costs$1.8 million of $4.0 million. We also incurred restructuring and other exit costs of $2.2 million primarily related to the integration of the Provide Commerce business during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $5.7 million incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. In addition, costs related to auditcorporate strategic planning and othera $1.1 million in professional fees decreased $0.3 million. Partially offsetting these reductions was an increase in personnel-related costs of $0.4 million, which included an increase in stock-based compensation of $2.6 millionfees. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in incentive compensation expense, and an increasedecreases of $1.2$1.5 million in litigationpersonnel-related expenses, $0.7 million in restructuring costs, and dispute settlements (net of insurance recoveries)$0.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

transaction-related costs.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

2013

Credit Agreement

On July 17, 2013,September 19, 2014, FTD Companies, Inc. entered into a credit agreement (the “2013 Credit“Credit Agreement”) with Interflora British Unit, certain wholly‑wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of FTD Companies, Inc. party thereto as guarantors, the financial institutions party thereto from time to time, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint lead arrangers and book managers, and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent for the lenders, which provided for a $350 million five‑year revolving credit facility. On July 17, 2013, FTD Companies, Inc. drew $220 million of the $350 million revolving credit facility and used this, together with approximately $19 million of its existing cash balance, to repay amounts outstanding under its previous credit facility in full and to pay fees and expenses related to the 2013 Credit Agreement.

On September 19, 2014, the Company entered into an amendment to the 2013 Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). Among other things, the Amended Credit Agreement provided for a term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $200 million, the proceeds of which were used to repay a portion of outstanding revolving loans under the Amended Credit Agreement, and also provided for a revolving loan advance (the “Acquisition Advance”) to finance the cash portion of the acquisitionAcquisition purchase price. On December 31, 2014, we borrowed $120 million under the Acquisition Advance to fund the cash portion of the acquisitionAcquisition purchase price.

The obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of FTD Companies, Inc.’s wholly‑wholly owned domestic subsidiaries (together with FTD Companies, Inc., the “U.S. Loan Parties”). In addition, the obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the U.S. Loan Parties, including a pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock of certain direct subsidiaries of the U.S. Loan Parties (except with respect to foreign subsidiaries and certain domestic subsidiaries whose assets consist primarily of foreign subsidiary equity interests, in which case such pledge is limited to 66% of the outstanding capital stock).

34


Table of Contents

The interest rates applicable to borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are based on either LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% per annum to 2.50% per annum, or a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.50% per annum to 1.50% per annum, calculated according to the Company’s net leverage ratio. At June 30, 2017, the base rate margin was 0.75% per annum and the LIBOR margin was 1.75% per annum. In addition, the Company pays a commitment fee ranging from 0.20% per annum to 0.40% per annum on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. The stated interest rates (based on LIBOR) at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 under the term loan and the revolving credit facility were 2.59%3.05% and 2.27%2.98%,respectively. The effective interest rates at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 under the term loan and the revolving credit facility were 3.39%3.99% and 3.06%3.51%, respectively. The commitment fee rate at SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 was 0.25%. The Amended Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, events of default, affirmative covenants, and negative covenants, that, among other things, require the Company to maintain compliance with a maximum net leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, and impose restrictions and limitations on, among other things, investments, dividends, share repurchases, and asset sales, and the Company’s ability to incur additional debt and additional liens. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement at SeptemberJune 30, 2016.

2017.

Table of Contents

The term loan is subject to amortization payments of $5.0$5 million per quarter and customary mandatory prepayments under certain conditions. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company made scheduled payments of $10 million under the term loan. The Company had net repayments of $5 million on the revolving credit facility during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The outstanding balance of the term loan and all amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are due upon maturity in September 2019.

At June 30, 2017, the remaining borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement, which was reduced by $2.7 million in outstanding letters of credit, was $232.3 million, subject to certain limitations under covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. After giving effect to the net leverage ratio contained in the Credit Agreement, approximately $100 million was available for additional borrowing as of June 30, 2017 based on 3.25 times the total of Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) for the last twelve months.

The degree to which our assets are leveraged and the terms of our debt could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain additional capital, as well as the terms at which such capital might be offered to us. We currently expect to have sufficient liquidity to meet our obligations for at least the next twelve months, including interest payment obligations, quarterly amortization payments, and mandatory prepayments, if any, under the Amended Credit Agreement.

Nine

Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015

2016

Our total cash and cash equivalents balance decreased by $41.7$1.6 million to $16.2$79.4 million at SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, compared to $57.9$81.0 million at December 31, 2015.2016. Our summary cash flows for the periods presented were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

 

2016

 

2015

Net cash used for operating activities

    

$

(3,192)

    

$

(2,704)

Net cash used for investing activities

 

$

(10,072)

 

$

(20,695)

Net cash used for financing activities

 

$

(27,784)

 

$

(56,225)

  Six Months Ended June 30,
  2017 2016
Net cash provided by operating activities $19,609
 $24,395
Net cash used for investing activities $(6,370) $(7,232)
Net cash used for financing activities $(15,927) $(18,508)
Net cash used forprovided by operating activities was $3.2decreased $4.8 million to $19.6 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162017 compared to net cash used for operating activities of $2.7$24.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015. The increase in net cash used for operating activities was primarily due to a $1.3 million change in operating assets and liabilities partially offset by an increase in net income.2016. Net cash provided by operating activities is driven by our net income adjusted for non‑cashnon-cash items including, but not limited to, depreciation and amortization, deferred taxes, stock‑basedstock-based compensation, gains on life insurance, and changes in operating assets and liabilities. The decrease in the net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a $15.8 million decrease in non-cash items offset by increases in net income of $5.2 million and net operating assets and liabilities of $5.8 million. The decreases in non-cash items related primarily to decreases in depreciation and amortization and deferred taxes. Changes in working capital can cause variationvariations in our cash flows provided by operating activities due to seasonality, timing, and other factors.

Net cash used for investing activities decreased by $10.6$0.9 million primarily due to the $9.9 millionfewer purchases of property and equipment, partially offset by prior year payment of the post-closing working capital adjustment and $1.9 million of proceeds received from life insurance during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.policies. Purchases of property and equipment were $12.0totaled $6.4 million during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017 compared to $10.7$8.2 million during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015.2016. We currently anticipate that our total capital expenditures for 20162017 will be approximately $20in the range of $22 million - $25 million. The actual amount of future capital expenditures may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, potential future acquisitions and new business initiatives, which are difficult to predict and which could change significantly over time. Additionally, technological advances may require us to make capital expenditures to develop or acquire new equipment or technology in order to replace aging or technologically obsolete equipment.

Net cash used for financing activities decreased by $28.4 million. The decrease in net cash used for financing activities was$2.6 million primarily due to common stock shares repurchased totaling $8.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 under our 2016 Repurchase Program. We did not repurchase any shares under this program during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Partially offsetting this decrease was the net repayment of $15.0 milliondebt of outstanding amounts under the Amended Credit Agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to repayment of $35.0totaling $15.0 million during the ninesix months

35


Table ended June 30, 2017 compared to the repayment of Contents

ended September 30, 2015. In addition,$10.0 million during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016, we purchased 0.45 million shares of our common stock under the 2016 Repurchase Program, as described below, for a total cost of $12.0 million compared to $20.0 million to repurchase 0.7 million shares of our common stock in the prior period under the previous repurchase program, as described in Item 7 of the Company’s Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015. We withhold shares to cover withholding taxes on vested restricted stock units and pay these taxes in cash. We paid $1.6 million and $2.0 million related to withholding taxes on vested restricted stock units during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

2016.

We currently expect to generate positive cash flows from operations at least for the next twelve months. We may use our existing cash balances and future cash generated from operations to fund, among other things, working capital, stock repurchases, interest payment obligations, quarterly debt amortization payments and mandatory prepayments, if any, under the Amended Credit Agreement, capital expenditures, and acquisitions.

Table of Contents

If we need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings, strategic relationships, or other arrangements, this capital might not be available to us in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise sufficient capital when needed could severely constrain or prevent us from, among other factors, developing new or enhancing existing services or products, acquiring other services, businesses, or technologies, or funding significant capital expenditures and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, as well as impair our ability to service our debt obligations. If additional funds were raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage of stock owned by the then‑currentthen-current stockholders could be reduced. Furthermore, such equity or any debt securities that we issue might have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to holders of our common stock. In addition, trends in the securities and credit markets may restrict our ability to raise any such additional funds, at least in the near term.

On March 8, 2016, our board of directors authorized a new common stock repurchase program (the “2016the 2016 Repurchase Program”) thatProgram, which allows us to repurchase up to $60 million of FTD common stock from time to time over a two yeartwo-year period in both open market and privately negotiated transactions. The objective of the 2016 Repurchase Program is to offset the dilutive effect on earnings per share from stock-based compensation and allow for opportunistic stock purchases to return capital to shareholders. As of September 30,December 31, 2016, the Company has repurchased 0.450.6 million shares under the 2016 Repurchase Program at an average cost per share of $26.75.In addition,$25.37. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during October 2016, the Company repurchased an additional 0.15 million shares under the 2016 Repurchase Program at an average cost per share of $21.24.

six months ended June 30, 2017.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

There have been no material changes, outside the ordinary course of business, related to the Company’s contractual obligations or other commitments as disclosed in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Off‑Balance2016.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, we did not have any off‑balanceoff-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S‑KS-K promulgated by the SEC, that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted

For information about recently adopted and recently issued accounting pronouncements refer to Note 1—“Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Accounting Standards

Policies, and Recent Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest, became effective as of January 1, 2016. This update requires that debt issuance costs related to a debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. ASU 2015-15, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, also became effective as of January 1, 2016. This update clarifies that an entity may elect to present debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset, regardless of whether or not there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. We elected to present all debt issuance costs, including those associated with our revolving credit facility, consistently as a direct deduction from the carrying amountPronouncements” of the liability. We have applied the provisions of ASU 

36


Table of Contents

2015-03 retrospectively to all periods presented, as required by the update. This resulted in a reclassification which reduced both other assets and the related outstanding debt by $4.0million and $5.1 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-04, Liabilities—Extinguishment of Liabilities—Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products. The amendments in this ASU specify how a company should derecognize amounts related to expected breakage of prepaid stored-value products. Breakage should be recognized in proportionNotes to the pattern of rights expected to be exercised by the product holder to the extent that it is probable a significant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied retrospectively or using a modified retrospective approach. Our accounting for breakage already follows the guidanceCondensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this ASU. Therefore, we have considered this ASU to have been adopted upon issuance.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014‑09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU affect any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The amendments in this ASU require an entity to recognize revenue related to the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. Further, in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing to clarify identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. This guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in evaluating whether promised goods and services are distinct a long with guidance to determine whether an entity promises to grant a license to a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property at a point in time or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property over a period of time. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which amends the guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. The guidance also clarifies that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. In addition, ASU 2016-12 clarifies how an entity should evaluate the collectability threshold and when an entity can recognize nonrefundable consideration received as revenue if an arrangement does not meet the standard’s contract criteria.  The guidance under this topic was deferred by ASU 2015-14, issued by the FASB in August 2015, and is now effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date for periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently assessing the impactPart I, Item 1 of this update on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory—Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost and net realizable value. The ASU defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The update does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The update applies to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and the interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments must be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the impact of this update on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial instruments, which includes amendments to address aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure.The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments must be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted for certain measurement enhancements within this amendment. Early adoption is not permitted for other

Form 10-Q.

37


Table of Contents

aspects updated in this amendment. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This update requires the recognition of certain lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet as well as the disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU require the recognition and measurement of leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients which may be elected by the Company. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation. The amendments in this ASU simplify several aspects of the accounting for stock-based compensation, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. These amendments are to be applied on a retrospective, modified retrospective, or prospective basis, depending on the related items. We are currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses. This update seeks to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables, and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments require an entity to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which guidance is effective, which is a modified-retrospective approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Clarification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This update was issued to address the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented, unless deemed impracticable, in which case, prospective application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes related to the Company’s market risk as disclosed in Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

2016.

38


ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a‑15(e)13a-15(e) and 15d‑15(e)15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, due to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as described below, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and are not effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’sour management, including the Company’sour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

39



Previously Identified Material Weakness
In connection with the preparation of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which was filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017, we concluded that there was a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness related to our control over the assessment of cross-border indirect taxes that allowed immaterial errors to occur that were not detected in a timely manner. Management reviewed the control related to the completeness and precision of its assessment as well as the periodic monitoring of cross-border indirect taxes and concluded that there was a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Remediation Plan
We are committed to remediating the material weakness by implementing improvements to our internal control over financial reporting. With the oversight of senior management and the audit committee, we have designed new internal controls and have already implemented, and will continue to implement, such controls to remediate the underlying cause of the material weakness as follows:
Enhance control procedures to ensure completeness of analyses supporting significant tax positions taken by the Company related to cross-border indirect taxes.
Enhance monitoring activities over highly technical tax-related aspects of cross-border transactions, including implementation of formal periodic meetings attended by the Chief Financial Officer, Corporate and divisional controllers, and members of the Company’s legal and tax departments, along with the engagement of external legal and tax experts as appropriate, to ensure that significant tax positions related to cross-border indirect taxes are fully reviewed and continuously monitored for appropriate accounting and disclosure.
Management is committed to a strong internal control environment and believes that, when fully implemented and tested, the measures described above will remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to assess our remediation efforts in connection with our ongoing assessments of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Other than the improvements noted above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a description of our material pending legal proceedings, please refer to Note 14—“Contingencies—Legal Matters” of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10‑Q.

10-Q.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Our business and common stock are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. The information presented below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risks summarized under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our most recent Form 10-K. Except as presented below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors described in our Form 10-K.

The United Kingdom vote to leave the European Union could adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

On June 23, 2016, the U.K. held a referendum in which a majority of voters voted to leave the European Union (“E.U.”), commonly referred to as “Brexit.” It is expected thatOn March 29, 2017, the Prime Minister of the U.K. government will commence asubmitted formal notice to the E.U. in order to trigger Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. This is the formal mechanism which begins the two-year process of negotiation to determinenegotiating the U.K.’s exit from the E.U. and the future terms of the U.K.’s withdrawal fromrelationship with the E.U., including the terms of trade between the U.K. and the E.U., and potentially other countries. A withdrawal could, among other outcomes, disrupt the free movement of goods, services and people between the U.K. and the E.U., undermine bilateral cooperation in key geographic areas, disrupt the markets we serve, and significantly disrupt trade between the U.K. and the E.U. or other nations as the U.K. pursues independent trade relations. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws to replace or replicate. The effects of Brexit will depend on any agreements the U.K. makes to retain access to the E.U. or other markets either during a transitional period or more permanently. Compliance with new laws or regulations regarding trade, delivery and other cross-border activities between the U.K. and the E.U. could be costly, negatively impacting our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Our International segment operates principally in the U.K. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016,2017, our International segment contributed approximately 14%12% of our consolidated revenues.

In addition, the announcement of the referendum results was followed by significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rates, including in particular a decline in the value of the GBP in comparison to both the USD and EUR. Uncertainty before, during and after the period of negotiation could have a negative economic impact and result in further market and exchange rate volatility for several years. Any of these effects, and others that the Company cannot anticipate, could adversely impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

40


ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On March 8, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program that allows the Company to repurchase up to $60 million of its common stock from time to time over a two year period in both open market and privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2016, the company had repurchased 0.6 million shares under the 2016 Repurchase Program at an average cost per share of $25.37.
The following table provides information regarding repurchasesCompany did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

    

 

    

 

 

    

Number of Shares

 

Approximate Dollar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased as Part

 

Value of Shares that

 

 

Total

 

Average

 

of Publicly

 

May Yet Be

 

 

Number of

 

Price Paid

 

Announced

 

Purchased Under

 

 

Shares

 

Per

 

Plans or

 

the Plans

Period

 

Purchased

 

Share

 

Programs(a)

 

or Programs

July 1 - July 31

 

150,000

 

$

25.76

 

150,000

 

$

47,965

August 1 - August 31

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

47,965

September 1 - September 30

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

47,965

Total

 

150,000

 

$

25.76

 

150,000

 

$

47,965
2017.

(a)

On March 8, 2016, the Company’s board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program that allows the Company to repurchase up to $60 million of its common stock from time to time over a two year period in both open market and privately negotiated transactions. No repurchases were made under the program prior to the second quarter of 2016.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

See the Exhibit Index following the signature page to this Form 10‑Q10-Q for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

41




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

Date: November 7, 2016

August 8, 2017

FTD Companies, Inc. (Registrant)

By:

/s/ Becky A. Sheehan

Stephen Tucker

Becky A. Sheehan

Stephen Tucker

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal (Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)

42



EXHIBIT INDEX

Incorporated by
Reference to

No.

Incorporated by
Reference to
No.Exhibit Description

Filed with this
Form 10‑Q

10-Q

Form

Form

File No.

Date
Filed

Date
Filed
Exhibit
Number
(if different) 

10.1 

Rhys Hughes Service

Third Amended and Restated 2013 Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Issuance Agreement Second Amendment

X

X

10.2 

Employment Agreement by and between Helen Quinn and FTD Companies, Inc.

X

10.3 

Second Amendment to the FTD Companies, Inc. 2016 Management Bonus Plan

X

31.1 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

X

X

31.2 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

X

X

32.1 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

X

X

32.2 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

X

X

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

X

X

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

X

X

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

X

X

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

X

X

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

X

X

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document

X

X



43



40