KENTUCKY BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share ~~amounts)~~data)

9/30/2017

12/31/2016

ASSETS

Cash and due from banks

$
18,426

$
42,052

Federal funds sold

186

1,198

Cash and cash equivalents

18,612

43,250

Interest bearing time deposits

1,830

5,029

Securities available for sale

289,956

273,770

Trading Assets

5,714

5,592

Loans held for sale

1,316

724

Loans

648,965

656,007

Allowance for loan losses

(7,755)

(7,541)

Net loans

641,210

648,466

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

7,034

7,034

Real estate owned, net

2,669

1,824

Assets held for sale

—

969

Bank premises and equipment, net

16,265

14,781

Interest receivable

3,785

3,715

Mortgage servicing rights

1,485

1,321

Goodwill

14,001

14,001

Other intangible assets

405

529

Other assets

6,476

7,442

Total assets

$
1,010,758

$
1,028,447

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Deposits

Non-interest bearing

$
220,518

$
219,556

Time deposits, $250,000 and over

68,528

74,302

Other interest bearing

459,333

509,123

Total deposits

748,379

802,981

Repurchase agreements

24,070

20,873

Federal funds purchased

17,302

—

Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

8,530

—

Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

93,665

92,500

Note payable

3,762

4,090

Subordinated debentures

7,217

7,217

Interest payable

796

692

Other liabilities

6,768

7,122

Total liabilities

910,489

935,475

Stockholders’ equity

Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued

—

—

Common stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 2,971,611 and 2,973,232 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

20,889

20,767

Retained earnings

78,515

73,161

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

865

(956)

Total stockholders’ equity

100,269

92,972

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$
1,010,758

$
1,028,447


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	6/30/2020		6/30/2019		6/30/2020		6/30/2019
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees	$	9,304	$	9,115	$	18,684	$	17,915
Securities
Taxable		1,295		1,695		2,764		3,524
Tax exempt		198		276		374		609
Other		81		274		191		491
Total interest income		10,878		11,360		22,013		22,539
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		1,160		1,612		2,628		3,149
Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		7		13		15		37
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		561		547		1,143		1,090
Note payable		—		31		—		65
Subordinated debentures		68		98		153		200
Total interest expense		1,796		2,301		3,939		4,541
Net interest income		9,082		9,059		18,074		17,998
Provision for loan losses		500		325		2,125		450
Net interest income after provision		8,582		8,734		15,949		17,548
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges		990		1,397		2,279		2,591
Loan service fee income (loss), net		(203)		31		(287)		104
Trust department income		332		347		702		675
Gain (loss) on sale of available for sale securities, net		232		20		344		114
Gain on sale of loans		1,379		321		2,062		528
Brokerage income		95		135		222		271
Debit card interchange income		915		903		1,727		1,693
Other		259		181		512		359
Total other income		3,999		3,335		7,561		6,335
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,196		4,683		10,161		9,373
Occupancy expenses		1,011		1,057		2,105		2,038
Legal and professional fees		364		248		609		464
Data processing		509		614		1,088		1,215
Debit card expenses		456		529		963		1,059
Advertising and marketing		182		212		449		446
Taxes other than payroll, property and income		339		325		676		649
Loss on limited partnership		292		159		585		318
Other		989		951		1,932		1,981
Total other expenses		9,338		8,778		18,568		17,543
Income before income taxes		3,243		3,291		4,942		6,340
Provision for income taxes		170		54		118		292
Net income	$	3,073	$	3,237	$	4,824	$	6,048
Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.51	$	0.54	$	0.81	$	1.01
Diluted		0.51		0.54		0.81		1.01

See Accompanying Notes

Table of Contents

KENTUCKY BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~INCOME AND~~ COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in ~~thousands, except per share amounts)~~thousands)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended


9/30/2017

9/30/2016

9/30/2017

9/30/2016

INTEREST INCOME:

Loans, including fees

$
7,779

$
7,630

$
22,985

$
22,432

Securities

Taxable

1,156

782

3,353

2,555

Tax exempt

625

649

1,801

1,967

Trading assets

27

44

86

117

Other

132

101

454

319

Total interest income

9,719

9,206

28,679

27,390

INTEREST EXPENSE:

Deposits

668

555

1,997

1,667

Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased

38

30

89

83

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

466

428

1,251

1,205

Note payable

48

57

147

177

Subordinated debentures

75

70

232

198

Total interest expense

1,295

1,140

3,716

3,330

Net interest income

8,424

8,066

24,963

24,060

Provision for loan losses

100

175

650

775

Net interest income after provision

8,324

7,891

24,313

23,285

NON-INTEREST INCOME:

Service charges

1,281

1,401

3,806

3,782

Loan service fee income, net

60

(26)

234

23

Trust department income

304

272

879

796

Gain on sale of available for sale securities, net

60

40

103

317

Gain (loss) on trading assets

(15)

(52)

36

48

Gain on sale of loans

415

533

1,456

1,289

Brokerage income

215

168

589

602

Debit card interchange income

763

699

2,274

2,053

Gain on bank premises

—

—

1,200

4

Other

88

201

239

218

Total other income

3,171

3,236

10,816

9,132

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:

Salaries and employee benefits

4,592

4,540

13,545

13,472

Occupancy expenses

935

974

2,884

2,831

Repossession expenses, net

104

79

289

222

FDIC Insurance

86

106

274

444

Legal and professional fees

285

423

762

1,314

Data processing

409

396

1,309

1,249

Debit card expenses

486

391

1,304

1,078

Amortization expense of intangible assets, excluding mortgage servicing right

38

45

124

201

Advertising and marketing

212

225

636

675

Taxes other than payroll, property and income

304

282

904

836

Telephone

83

77

342

262

Postage

92

88

270

278

Loan fees

40

64

151

155

Other

669

1,064

2,276

2,536

Total other expenses

8,335

8,754

25,070

25,553

Income before taxes

3,160

2,373

10,059

6,864

Income taxes

568

8

1,920

580

Net income

$
2,592

$
2,365

$
8,139

$
6,284

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Change in unrealized gains on securities, net of tax

(348)

(800)

1,821

3,243

Comprehensive Income

$
2,244

$
1,565

$
9,960

$
9,527

Earnings per share

Basic

$
0.87

$
0.79

$
2.74

$
2.10

Diluted

0.87

0.79

2.74

2.10

Dividends per share

0.29

0.27

0.87

0.81


		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	6/30/2020		6/30/2019		6/30/2020		6/30/2019
Net income	$	3,073	$	3,237	$	4,824	$	6,048

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Unrealized gains on securities arising during the period		2,146		2,757		2,500		6,356
Reclassification of realized amount		(232)		(20)		(344)		(114)
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities		1,914		2,737		2,156		6,242
Less: Tax impact		(487)		(575)		(539)		(1,311)
Net of tax		1,427		2,162		1,617		4,931

Unrealized gains (losses) on cashflow hedges arising during the period		487		—		(2,178)		—
Reclassification of realized amount		18		—		12		—
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on cashflow hedges		505		—		(2,166)		—
Less: Tax impact		445		—		445		—
Net of tax		950		—		(1,721)		—

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		2,377		2,162		(104)		4,931

Comprehensive income	$	5,450	$	5,399	$	4,720	$	10,979

See Accompanying Notes

Table of Contents

KENTUCKY BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in thousands except per share ~~information)~~data)


						Accumulated
						Other		Total
	Common Stock			Retained		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Earnings		Income (Loss)		Equity
Balances, December 31, 2018	5,955,242	$	21,170	$	89,101	$	(3,478)	$	106,793
									—
Common stock issued (employee stock grants of 23,260 shares, net of 120 shares forfeited, and director stock grants of 2,824 shares)	26,084		295		—		—		295
Stock compensation expense	—		56		—		—		56
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—		2,769		2,769
Net income	—		—		2,811		—		2,811
Dividends declared - $0.17 per share	—		—		(1,015)		—		(1,015)
Balances, March 31, 2019	5,981,326	$	21,521	$	90,897	$	(709)	$	111,709

Stock compensation expense	—		58		—		—		58
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—		2,162		2,162
Net income	—		—		3,237		—		3,237
Dividends declared - $0.17 per share	—		—		(1,019)		—		(1,019)
Balances, June 30, 2019	5,981,326	$	21,579	$	93,115	$	1,453	$	116,147


Balances, December 31, 2019	5,913,922	$	21,447	$	96,903	$	913	$	119,263
Common stock issued (employee stock grants of 29,242 shares, net of 788 shares withheld in lieu of income tax, and director stock grants of 3,834 shares)	33,076		263		—		—		263
Stock compensation expense	—		61		—		—		61
Other comprehensive loss	—		—		—		(2,481)		(2,481)
Net income	—		—		1,751		—		1,751
Dividends declared - $0.18 per share	—		—		(1,070)		—		(1,070)
Balances, March 31, 2020	5,946,998	$	21,771	$	97,584	$	(1,568)	$	117,787

Shares Forfeited	(480)		—		—		—		—
Stock compensation expense	—		61		—		—		61
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—		2,377		2,377
Net income	—		—		3,073		—		3,073
Dividends declared - $0.18 per share	—		—		(1,070)		—		(1,070)
Balances, June 30, 2020	5,946,518	$	21,832	$	99,587	$	809	$	122,228

Accumulated


Other

Total

Common Stock

Retained

Comprehensive

Stockholders’

(Dollars in thousands)

Shares

Amount

Earnings

Income

Equity

Balances, January 1, 2017

2,973,232

$
20,767

$
73,161

$
(956)

$
92,972

Common stock issued (employee stock grants of  5,423 shares, net of 1,152 shares forfeited, director stock awards of 1,386 shares and director stock options exercised of 600 shares)

7,409

64

—

—

64

Stock compensation expense

—

121

—

—

121

Common stock purchased and retired

(9,030)

(63)

(200)

—

(263)

Other comprehensive income

—

—

—

1,821

1,821

Net income

—

—

8,139

—

8,139

Dividends declared - $0.87 per share

—

—

(2,585)

—

(2,585)

Balances, September 30, 2017

2,971,611

$
20,889

$
78,515

$
865

$
100,269

~~(1)~~

~~Common Stock has no par value; amount includes Additional Paid-in Capital~~

(1) Common Stock has 0 par value; amount includes Additional Paid-in Capital

See Accompanying Notes

Table of Contents

KENTUCKY BANCSHARES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in ~~thousands, except share information)~~thousands)

Nine Months Ended

9/30/2017

9/30/2016

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net Income

$
8,139

$
6,284

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

514

985

Securities amortization (accretion), net

794

854

Stock based compensation expense

121

117

Provision for loan losses

650

775

Securities available for sale gains, net

(103)

(317)

Net change in trading assets

(122)

(165)

Originations of loans held for sale

(46,559)

(43,331)

Proceeds from sale of loans

47,423

42,345

Losses (gains) on sale of bank premises and equipment

(1,200)

(4)

Losses (gains) on other real estate

(11)

(163)

Gain on sale of loans

(1,456)

(1,289)

Write-downs of other real estate, net

141

131

Changes in:

Interest receivable

(70)

(6)

Other assets

4

461

Interest payable

104

81

Deferred taxes

12

1,663

Other liabilities

(354)

(2,425)

Net cash from operating activities

8,027

5,996

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Net change in interest bearing time deposits

3,199

(155)

Purchases of securities available for sale

(59,235)

(61,876)

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale

14,559

23,888

Proceeds from principal payments, maturities and calls securities available for sale

30,570

50,987

Net change in loans

5,048

(35,688)

Purchases of bank premises and equipment

(2,270)

(667)

Proceeds from the sale of bank premises and equipment

2,062

4

Proceeds from the sale of other real estate

922

734

Net cash used in investing activities

(5,145)

(22,773)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

Net change in deposits

(54,602)

(24,783)

Net change in repurchase agreements

3,197

5,037

Net change in federal funds purchased

17,302

10,517

Net change in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

8,530

10,000

Proceeds from long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

13,000

15,000

Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

(11,835)

(6,660)

Repayment of note payable

(328)

(600)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

64

49

Purchase of common stock

(263)

(296)

Dividends paid

(2,585)

(2,426)

Net cash (used in) from financing activities

(27,520)

5,838

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

(24,638)

(10,939)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

43,250

28,048

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
18,612

$
17,109

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information Cash paid during the year for:

Interest expense

$
3,612

$
3,249

Income taxes

1,600

800

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities

Real estate acquired through foreclosure

$
1,897

$
235


	Six Months Ended
	6/30/2020		6/30/2019
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net Income	$	4,824	$	6,048
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		676		595
Amortization (accretion), net		144		(81)
Securities amortization (accretion), net		568		391
Stock based compensation expense		122		114
Provision for loan losses		2,125		450
Gain on sale of available for sale securities, net		(344)		(114)
Net increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance		(284)		(159)
Originations of loans held for sale		(63,972)		(26,245)
Proceeds from sale of loans		62,000		25,588
Gain on sale of loans		(2,062)		(528)
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate		(10)		(2)
Write-downs of other real estate, net		38		38
Amortization of operating leases		48		59
Changes in:
Interest receivable		(820)		(111)
Other assets		488		512
Interest payable		81		(15)
Deferred taxes		(946)		(383)
Other liabilities		(341)		(2,420)
Net cash from operating activities		2,335		3,737
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Net change in interest bearing time deposits		101		200
Purchases of securities available for sale		(35,511)		(14,815)
Purchase of FHLB stock		(38)		—
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		17,096		29,734
Proceeds from principal payments, maturities and calls securities available for sale		36,901		25,822
Net change in loans		(64,350)		(22,186)
Purchases of bank premises and equipment		(2,011)		(869)
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate		241		135
Net cash from (used in) investing activities		(47,571)		18,021
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net change in deposits		101,903		(17,574)
Net change in repurchase agreements		(1,686)		(3,649)
Net change in short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		25,500		(200)
Proceeds from long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		15,000		9,000
Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(11,513)		(5,384)
Repayment of note payable		—		(422)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		263		295
Dividends paid		(2,140)		(2,034)
Net cash used in financing activities		127,327		(19,968)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		82,091		1,790
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		22,182		26,101
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	104,273	$	27,891
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information Cash paid during the year for:
Interest expense	$	3,858	$	4,556
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities
Securities transactions in process, payable		2,811		—
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		—		72
In conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2016-02, as detailed in Note 8 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements, a net operating lease asset and a related lease liability was recognized at 1/1/2019		—		6,373

See Accompanying Notes

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31 has been prepared from the Company’s books and records without audit. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s accounting and reporting policies as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements, have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. ~~(“Kentucky Bancshares”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”)~~(the Company), its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Kentucky Bank (the ~~“Bank”)~~Bank) and KBI Insurance Company, Inc., a captive insurance subsidiary, and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, KB Special Assets Unit, LLC. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Nature of Operations: The Bank operates under a state bank charter and provides full banking services, including trust services, to customers located in Bourbon, Clark, Elliot, Fayette, Harrison, Jessamine, Madison, Rowan, Scott, Woodford and adjoining counties in Kentucky. As a state bank, the Bank is subject to regulation by the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ~~(“FDIC”)~~(FDIC). The Company, a bank holding company, is regulated by the Federal Reserve.

KBI Insurance Company, Inc. ~~is a subsidiary of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and is located in Las Vegas, Nevada. It is~~, a captive insurance subsidiary, ~~which provides various liability and property damage insurance policies for Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and its related subsidiaries. KBI Insurance Company, Inc.~~ is regulated by the State of Nevada Division of Insurance.

Estimates in the Financial Statements: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those ~~estimates~~estimates.

COVID-19: In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), was reported in Wuhan, China. The COVID-19 virus continues to aggressively spread globally and ~~such differences~~has spread to over 185 countries, including all 50 states in the United States. A prolonged COVID-19 outbreak, or any other epidemic that harms the global economy, U.S. economy, or the economies in which we operate could ~~be material~~adversely affect our operations. While the spread of the COVID-19 virus has minimally impacted our operations as of June 30, 2020, it has caused significant economic disruption throughout the United States as state and local governments issued “shelter at home” orders along with the closing of non-essential businesses. The potential financial impact is unknown at this time. However, if these actions are sustained, it may adversely impact several industries within our geographic footprint and impair the ability of our customers to fulfill their contractual obligations to the Company. This could cause Kentucky Bancshares to experience a material adverse effect on our business operations, asset valuations, financial ~~statements.~~condition, and results of operations. Material adverse impacts may include all or a combination of valuation impairments on Kentucky Bancshares’s intangible assets, investments, loans, loan servicing rights, deferred tax assets, or counter-party risk derivatives.

~~Trading Assets~~Cash Flows: For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold, and certain short-term investments with maturities of less than three months. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods. Net cash flows are reported for loan, deposit and short-term borrowing transactions.

Interest Bearing Time Deposits: Interest bearing time deposits in other financial institutions have original maturities between one and three years and are carried at cost.

Table of Contents

Securities: The Company ~~engages~~is required to classify its securities portfolio into one of three categories: trading securities, securities available for sale and securities held to maturity. Fair value adjustments are made to the securities based on their classification with the exception of the held to maturity category. The Company has no investments classified as trading securities or held to maturity. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses for securities which are classified as available for sale are reported in ~~trading activities~~other comprehensive income, net of deferred tax.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Premiums on purchased callable debt securities are amortized to the earliest call date. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the settlement date and determined using the specific identification method.

Equity investments with readily determinable fair values are included in other assets with changes in fair value recorded in other income.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its ~~own account. Securities~~amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings.

For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and 2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as determined by outstanding commitments from investors or current secondary market prices, calculated on the aggregate loan basis. The Company also provides for any losses on uncovered commitments to lend or sell. The Company sells loans with servicing rights retained.

Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity are stated at the amount of unpaid principal, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs and acquired purchase premiums and discounts, reduced by an allowance for loan losses. Interest income on loans is recognized on the accrual basis except for those loans on a nonaccrual status. Interest income on real estate mortgage (1-4 family residential and multi-family residential) and consumer loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent, and interest income on real estate construction, non-farm and non-residential mortgage, agricultural and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 120 days delinquent, unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are ~~held principally~~collectively evaluated for ~~resale~~impairment and individually classified impaired loans. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment of the yield on the related loan. Recorded investment is the outstanding loan balance, excluding accrued interest receivable. When interest accrual is discontinued, interest income received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Typically, the Company seeks to establish a payment history of at least 6 consecutive payments made on a timely basis before returning a loan to accrual status. Consumer and credit card loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. Loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

Table of Contents

Concentration of Credit Risk: Most of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within Bourbon, Clark, Elliott, Fayette, Harrison, Jessamine, Madison, Rowan, Scott, Woodford and surrounding counties located in Kentucky. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the ~~near term~~economy in these counties.

Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

Adjustments are made to the historical loss experience ratios based on the qualitative factors as outlined in the regulatory Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. These qualitative factors include the nature and volume of portfolio, economic and business conditions, classification, past due and non-accrual trends.

Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated at the portfolio segment level using the same methodology for each segment. The recent historical actual net losses is the basis for the general reserve for each segment which is then adjusted for qualitative factors as outlined above (i.e., nature and volume of portfolio, economic and business conditions, classification, past due and non-accrual trends) specifically evaluated at individual segment levels.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors for non-classified loans and a migration analysis for classified loans.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans, for which the terms have been modified, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and has been granted a concession, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired.

Loans are charged off when available information confirms that loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible. While management considers the number of days a loan is past due in its evaluation process, we also consider a variety of other factors.

Factors considered by management in evaluating the charge-off decision include collateral value, availability of current financial information for both borrower and guarantor (if any), and the probability of collecting contractual principal and interest payments. These considerations may result in loans being charged off before they are 90 days or more past due. This evaluation framework for determining charge-offs is consistently applied to each segment.

From time to time, the Company will charge-off a portion of impaired and non-performing loans. Loans that meet the criteria under ASC 310 are evaluated individually for impairment. Management considers payment status, collateral value, availability of current financial information for the borrower and guarantor, actual and expected cash flows, and probability of collecting amounts due. If a loan’s collection status is deemed to be collateral dependent or foreclosure is imminent, the loan is charged down to the fair value of the collateral, less selling costs. In circumstances where the loan is not deemed to be collateral dependent, but we believe, after completing our evaluation process, that probable loss has been incurred, we will provide a specific allocation on that loan.

The impact of recording partial charge-offs is a reduction of gross loans and a reduction of the loan loss reserve. The net loan balance is unchanged in instances where the loan had a specific allocation as a component of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance as a percentage of total loans may be lower as the allowance no longer needs to include a component for the loss, which has now been recorded, and net charge-off amounts are increased as partial charge-offs are recorded.

Table of Contents

Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Commercial and real estate construction and real estate mortgage loans (multi-family residential, and non-farm and non-residential mortgage) over $200 thousand are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and 1-4 family residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures.

Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception.

If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.

The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the most recent 5 years. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations.

A “portfolio segment” is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology to determine its allowance for loan losses. The Company has identified the following portfolio segments: commercial, real estate construction, real estate mortgage, agricultural, consumer (credit cards and other consumer) and other (overdrafts).

Commercial: These loans to businesses do not have real estate as the underlying collateral. Instead of real estate, collateral could be business assets such as equipment or accounts receivable or the personal guarantee of one or more guarantors. These loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by commercial real estate because in the event of default by the borrower, the business assets must be liquidated and/or guarantors pursued for deficit funds. Business assets are worth more while they are in use to produce income for the business and worth significantly less if the business is no longer in operation. Within the commercial portfolio, risk analysis is performed primarily based on the individual loan type.

Real estate construction: Real estate construction consists of loans secured by real estate for additions or alterations to existing structures, as well as constructing new structures. They include fixed and floating rate loans. Real estate construction loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by 1-4 family residential real estate primarily because of the length of the construction period, potential change in prices of construction, the incomplete status of the collateral and economic cycles. Because of these factors, real estate construction loans generally have higher qualitative adjustments.

Real Estate Mortgage:

1-4 family residential: Loans secured by 1-4 family residential real estate represent the lowest risk of loans for the Company. They include fixed and floating rate loans as well as loans for commercial purposes or consumer purposes. The Company generally does not hold subprime residential mortgages. Borrowers with loans in this category, whether for commercial or consumer purposes, tend to make their payments timely as they do not want to risk foreclosure and loss of property.

Table of Contents

Multifamily residential: Loans secured by multifamily residential real estate consist primarily of loans secured by apartment buildings and can be either fixed or floating rate loans. Multi-family residential real estate loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by 1-4 family residential real estate because the borrower’s repayment ability typically comes from rents from tenants. Local economic and employment fluctuations impact rent rolls and potentially the borrower’s repayment ability.

Non-farm & non-residential: Loans secured by non-farm non-residential real estate consist of loans secured by commercial real estate that is not owner occupied. These loans generally consist of loans collateralized by property whereby rents received from commercial tenants of the borrower are the source of repayment. These loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by owner occupied commercial real estate because repayment risk is expanded to be dependent on the success of multiple businesses which are paying rent to the borrower.

If multiple businesses fail due to deteriorating economic conditions or poor business management skills, the borrower may not have enough rents to cover their monthly payment. Repayment risk is also increased depending on the level of surplus available commercial lease space in the local market area.

Agricultural: These loans to agricultural businesses do not have real estate as the underlying collateral. Instead of real estate, collateral could be assets such as equipment or accounts receivable or the personal guarantee of one or more guarantors. These loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by real estate because in the event of default by the borrower, the assets must be liquidated and/or guarantors pursued for deficit funds. Farm assets are worth more while they are in use to produce income and worth significantly less if the farm is no longer in operation.

Consumer: Consumer loans are generally loans to borrowers for non-business purposes. They can be either secured or unsecured. Consumer loans are generally small in the individual amount of principal outstanding and are repaid from the borrower’s private funds earned from employment. Consumer lending risk is very susceptible to local economic trends.

If there is a consumer loan default, any collateral that may be repossessed is generally not well maintained and has a diminished value. For this reason, consumer loans tend to have higher overall interest rates to cover the higher cost of repossession and charge-offs. However, due to their smaller average balance per borrower, consumer loans are collectively evaluated for impairment in determining the appropriate allowance for loan losses.

Other: All other loan types are aggregated together for credit risk evaluation due to the varying nature but small number of the remaining types of loans in the Company’s loan portfolio. Loans in this segment include but are not limited to overdrafts. Due to their smaller balance, other loans are collectively evaluated for impairment in determining the appropriate allowance for loan losses.

Due to the overall high level of real estate mortgage loans within the loan portfolio as a whole, as compared to other portfolio segments, for risk assessment and allowance purposes this segment was segregated into more granular pools by collateral property type.

The non-farm non-residential and the multi-family real estate mortgage loan portfolio segments had the next highest level of qualitative adjustments due to the effects of local markets and economies on the underlying collateral property values, as well as for industry concentrations and risks related to the this type of property.

Derivatives: At the inception of a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative as one of three types based on the Company’s intentions and belief as to likely effectiveness as a hedge. These three types are (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value hedge”), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”), or (3) an instrument with no hedging designation (“stand-alone derivative”). For a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item, are recognized in current earnings as fair value changes.

For a cashflow hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported in other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported currently in earnings, as non-interest income.

Table of Contents

Net cash settlements on derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in interest income or interest expense, based on the item being hedged. Net cash settlements on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported in non-interest income. Cash flows on hedges are classified in the cash flow statement the same as the cash flows of the items being hedged.

The Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge transactions at the inception of the hedging relationship. This documentation includes linking both fair value hedges and cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions.

The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, a hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, a hedged firm commitment is no longer firm, or treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative are recorded as non-interest income. When a fair value hedge is discontinued, the hedged asset or liability is no longer adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized or accreted over the remaining life of the asset or liability. When a cash flow hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transactions are still expected to occur, gains or losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods which the hedged transactions will affect earnings.

Mortgage Banking Derivatives: Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of these mortgage loans are accounted for as free standing derivatives. The fair value of the interest rate lock is recorded at the time the commitment to fund the mortgage loan is executed and is adjusted for the expected exercise of the commitment before the loan is funded. In order to hedge the change in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans, the Company enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of the mortgage loans when interest rate locks are entered into. Fair values of these mortgage derivatives are estimated based on changes in mortgage interest rates from the date the interest on the loan is locked. Changes in the fair values of these derivatives are included in net gains on the sales of loans.

Mortgage Servicing Rights: The Bank has sold certain residential mortgage loans to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) while retaining the servicing rights. Servicing rights are recognized separately when they are acquired through sales of loans. When mortgage loans are sold, servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in gain on sale of mortgage loans. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income.

The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. All classes of servicing assets are subsequently measured using the amortization method which requires servicing rights to be amortized into loan service fee income, net, included in non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying loans.

Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to carrying amount. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into groupings based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type and investor type.Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual grouping, to the extent that fair value is less than the carrying amount. If the Company later determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular grouping, a reduction of the allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. The fair values of servicing rights are subject to significant fluctuations as a result of changes in ~~fair value included in earnings. Interest~~estimated and ~~dividends~~actual prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.

Table of Contents

Servicing fee income, which is reported on the income statement as loan service income, net, is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights and valuation allowance are netted against loan servicing fee income. Servicing fees totaled $299 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $267 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and are included in loan service fee income, net ~~interest income.~~

~~Loss Contingencies: Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising~~ in the ~~ordinary course~~income statement. Servicing fees totaled $154 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $134 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and are included in loan service fee income, net in the income statement. Late fees and ancillary fees related to loan servicing are not material. Amortization expense, including write-downs for fair value adjustments, was $586 thousand for the for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $163 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2019. Amortization expense, including write-downs for fair value adjustments, was $357 thousand for the for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $103 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Stock: The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance: The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain key employees. Bank- owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

Bank Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line (or accelerated) method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years.

Real Estate Owned: Physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan occurs when legal title is obtained upon completion of foreclosure or when the borrower conveys all interest in the property to satisfy the loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. The value of the underlying loan is written down to the fair value of the real estate to be acquired by a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. Any subsequent write-downs are charged to operating expenses. Operating expenses of such properties, net of related income, and gains and losses on their disposition are included in other expenses.

Investments in Limited Partnerships: Investments in limited partnerships represent the Company’s investments in affordable housing projects for the primary purpose of available tax benefits. The Company is a limited partner in these investments and as such, the Company is not involved in the management or operation of such investments. These investments are amortized over the period that the Company expects to receive the tax benefits. These investments are evaluated for impairment when events indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

The investment recorded at June 30, 2020 was $3.6 million and $3.9 million at June 30, 2019, respectively, and is included with other assets in the balance sheet. During the six months ended ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized amortization expense of $585 thousand and $318 thousand, respectively, which was included within noninterest expense on the consolidated statements on income. During the three months ended ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized amortization expense of $292 thousand and $159 thousand, respectively, which was included within noninterest expense on the consolidated statements on income.

Leases: Lessees are required to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with lease terms greater than 12 months. The Company recorded an operating lease right of use asset of $7.9 million and an operating lease liability of $8.1 million, as of June 30, 2020, as a result of recording operating lease contracts where the Company is lessee.

Table of Contents

Repurchase Agreements: Substantially all repurchase agreement liabilities represent amounts advanced by various customers. Securities are pledged to cover these liabilities, which are not covered by federal deposit insurance.

Stock-Based Compensation: Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards.

Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Revenue Recognition: The Company’s services that fall within the scope of ASC 606 are presented within Non-Interest Income and are recognized as revenue as the Company satisfies its obligation to the customer. Services within the scope of ASC 606 include trust department income, service charges, debit card interchange income and brokerage income.

Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, 0 tax benefit is recorded.

The Company recognizes interest related to income tax matters as interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as other expense.

Retirement Plans: Employee 401(k) and profit sharing plan expense is the amount of matching contributions.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets: Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. The Company has selected December 31 as the date to perform the annual impairment test. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our balance sheet. Despite the recent economic downturn associated with the

COVID-19 pandemic, management believes no impairment exists to Goodwill as of June 30, 2020. However, management did conclude that that the current decline in macroeconomic conditions is a triggering event and peformed a goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2020. Management continues to evaluate the Company’s qualitative assessment assumptions.

Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible assets arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on either an accelerated or straight-line basis, over 10 or 15 years.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments: Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

Earnings Per Common Share: Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options. Earnings and dividends per share have been adjusted in all periods presented to give effect to all stock splits and dividends through the date of issuance of the financial statements.

Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income (Loss): Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, and unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges, which are also recognized as ~~liabilities when~~a separate component of equity.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the ~~likelihood~~absence of ~~loss~~broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.

Operating Segments: While the Company’s chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of the various Company products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is ~~probable and an amount or range~~evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of ~~loss can~~the Company’s operations are considered by management to be ~~reasonably estimated.~~aggregated into 1 reportable operating segment: banking.

Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior ~~period~~year net income or stockholders’ equity.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

FASB ASC 326, 815, and 825 – In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts~~No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and ~~Cash Payments.”~~ ~~Issued in August 2016, ASU 2016-15 provides guidance to reduce the diversity in practice of how certain cash receipts~~Hedging, and ~~cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows.~~ Topic 825, Financial Instruments. The amendments ~~of ASU 2016-15 provide guidance on eight specific cash flow: (i)~~related to Topic 326 address accrued interest, transfers between classifications or categories for loans and debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (ii) settlement of zero-coupon bonds; (iii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (iv) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (v) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (vi) distributions received from equity method investees; (vii) beneficial interests in securitization

~~Table of Contents~~

~~transactions~~securities, recoveries, vintage disclosures, and ~~(viii) separately identifiable cash flows~~contractual extensions and ~~application of the predominance principle. The amendments of ASU 2016-15 are~~renewal options and became effective for annual periods and interim ~~and~~periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, ~~2017. Management has evaluated~~2019. The improvements and clarifications related to Topic 815 address partial-term fair value hedges of interest-rate risk, amortization, and disclosure of fair value hedge basis adjustments and consideration of hedged contractually specified interest rate under the hypothetical method and became effective for the annual reporting period beginning January 1, 2020. The amendments related to Topic 825 contain various improvements to ASU 2016-01, including scope; held-to-maturity debt securities fair value disclosures; and remeasurement of equity securities at historical exchange rates and became effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments in this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements

FASB ASC 350 – In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles: Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of ~~ASU 2016-15 and does~~a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not ~~believe~~exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that ~~adoption~~reporting unit. In addition, the income tax effects of ~~this ASU will impact Kentucky Bancshares existing presentation~~tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the ~~applicable cash receipts~~reporting unit should be considered when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. The nature of and ~~cash~~reason for the change in accounting principle should be disclosed upon transition. The amendments in this update became effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

Table of Contents

FASB ASC 820 – In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The updated guidance improves the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The ASU removes certain disclosures required by Topic 820 related to transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements; and for nonpublic entities, the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in earnings for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period.

The ASU modifies certain disclosures required by Topic 820 related to disclosure of transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and purchases and issues of Level 3 assets and liabilities for nonpublic entities; the requirement to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee’s assets and the date when restrictions from redemption might lapse only if the investee has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly for investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value; and clarification that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. The ASU adds certain disclosure requirements related to changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this update became effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

On March 22, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus”, which was subsequently

clarified and revised by an interagency statement issued on April 7, 2020. This guidance encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. The guidance goes on to explain that in consultation with the FASB staff that the federal banking agencies conclude that short-term modifications (e.g. six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current as of the implementation date of a relief program are not Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”). The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and has subsequently been amended several times. Section 4013 of the CARES Act also addressed COVID-19 related modifications and specified that COVID-19 related modifications on loans that were current as of December 31, 2019 are not TDRs. Modifications were executed in the second quarter of 2020. The majority of these modifications involved three to six month forbearance payments which were added to the end of the note. As of June 30, 2020, we had approved modifications on ~~its consolidated statement~~approximately $115 million of ~~cash flows.~~loans.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” Issued in June 2016, ASU 2016-13 ~~will add~~added Financial Accounting Standards Board “FASB” ASC Topic 326, ~~“Financial~~

“Financial Instruments-Credit Losses” and ~~finalizes~~finalized amendments to FASB ASC Subtopic 825-15, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses.” The amendments of ASU 2016-13 are intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information related to expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit by replacing the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to determine credit loss estimates.

The ~~amendments of ASU 2016-13 eliminate~~amendment requires the ~~probable initial recognition threshold and, in turn, reflect an entity’s current estimate~~measurement of all expected credit ~~losses. ASU 2016-13 does not specify~~losses for financial assets held at the ~~method for measuring expected credit losses,~~reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and ~~an entity is allowed~~reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to ~~apply methods that reasonably reflect its expectations of the~~enhance their credit loss ~~estimate. Additionally, the amendments of ASU 2016-13 require that~~estimates. The amendment requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, on available for sale debt securities be presented as an allowance rather than as a writedown. The amendments of ASU 2016-13 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Kentucky Bancshares plans to adopt the amendments of ASU 2016-13 during the first quarter of 2020. Kentucky Bancshares has established a steering committee which includes the appropriate members of management to evaluate the impact this ASU will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures and determine the most appropriate method of implementing the amendments in this ASU as well as any resources needed to implement the amendments.

~~ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”~~ Issued in March 2016, ASU 2016-09 seeks to reduce complexity in accounting standards by simplifying several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The amendments of ASU 2016-09 include: (i) requiring all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement; (ii) requiring excess tax benefits to be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity on the statement of cash flow; (iii) allowing an entity to make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that expect to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur; (iv) change the threshold to qualify for equity classification to permit withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions; and (v) requiring that cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes to be classified as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. The amendments of ASU 2016-09 became effective for Kentucky Bancshares on January 1, 2017 and did not have a material impact on Kentucky Bancshares consolidated financial statements. The Company has made an entity-wide accounting policy election to account for forfeitures of stock awards as they occur. Changes to Kentucky Bancshares consolidated statement of cash flows required by the amendments of ASU 2016-09 are incorporated into the presentation in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month and nine month periods ending September 30, 2017.

~~ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).”~~ Issued in February 2016, ASU 2016-02 was issued by the FASB to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and by disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, the ASU contains some targeted improvements that are intended to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and with the updated revenue recognition guidance issued in 2014. The amendments of ASU 2016-02 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Kentucky Bancshares plans to adopt the amendments of ASU 2016-02 beginning in the first quarter of 2019. At adoption, Kentucky Bancshares will recognize a lease asset and a corresponding lease liability on its consolidated balance sheet for its total lease obligation measured on a discounted basis. As of September 30, 2017, all leases in which Kentucky Bancshares was the lessee were classified as operating leases.

~~Table of Contents~~

Kentucky Bancshares does not anticipate any material impact to its consolidated statements of income, balance sheet or regulatory capital as a result of the adoption of this ASU as the Company has an immaterial amount of leases in which it is the lessee.

ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification).” Issued in January 2016, ASU 2016-01 is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with improved decision-making information. The amendments of ASU 2016-01 include: (i) requiring equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in the consolidation of an investee, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (ii) requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values; (iii) eliminating the requirement to disclose the method and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (iv) requiring the use of the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (v) requiring an entity that has elected the fair value option to measure the fair value of a liability to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the change in the fair value resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk; (vi) requiring separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and (vii) clarifying that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments of ASU 2016-01 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Kentucky Bancshares plans to adopt the amendments of ASU 2016-01 during the first quarter of 2018. Management has evaluated the impact this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financials statements.

~~ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).”~~ Issued in May 2014, ASU 2014-09 will add FASB ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” and will supersede revenue recognition requirements in FASB ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” as well as certain cost guidance in FASB ASC Topic 605-35, “Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts.” ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces the existing industry and transaction specific requirements under the existing standards. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to apply a five-step model to determine when to recognize revenue and at what amount. The model specifies that revenue should be recognized when (or as) an entity transfers control of goods or services to a customer at the amount in which the entity expects to be entitled. Depending on whether certain criteria are met, revenue should be recognized either over time, in a manner that depicts the entity’s performance, or at a point in time, when control of the goods or services are transferred to the customer. ASU 2014-09 provides that an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of non-financial assets that are not in a contract with a customer are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement in ASU 2014-09.

The amendments of ASU 2014-09 may be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If the transition method of application is elected, the entity should also provide the additional disclosures in reporting periods that include the date of initial application of (1) the amount by which each financial statement line item is affected in the current reporting period, as compared to the guidance that was in effect before the change, and (2) an explanation of the reasons for significant changes. ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)-Deferral of the Effective Date,” issued in August 2015, defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2015-14 provides that the amendments of ASU 2014-09 become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. All subsequently issued ASUs which provide additional guidance and clarifications to various aspects of FASB ASC Topic 606 will become effective when the amendments of ASU 2014-09 become effective. Kentucky Bancshares plans to adopt these amendments during the first quarter of 2018. Management is continuing to evaluate the impact ASU 2014-09 will have on Kentucky Bancshares consolidated financial statements as well as the ~~most appropriate transition method~~credit quality and underwriting standards of ~~application. Based~~an organization’s portfolio. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on this evaluation to date, Management has determined that the majority of the revenues earned by Kentucky Bancshares are not within the scope of ASU 2014-09. Management also believes that for most revenue streams within the scope of ASU 2014-09, the amendments will not change the timing of when the revenue is recognized.available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration.

917

Table of Contents

~~Management will continue~~As previously disclosed, the Company formed a steering committee to ~~evaluate the impact~~oversee the adoption of the ASU ~~2014-09 will~~at the effective date. Appropriate members of Senior Management have developed a plan focused on ~~Kentucky Bancshares consolidated financial statements, focusing on noninterest income sources within~~understanding the ~~scope of~~ ASU, ~~2014-09 as well as new disclosures required by these amendments; however, the adoption of ASU 2014‑09~~researching issues, identifying data needs for modeling inputs, technology requirements, and modeling considerations. The Company is ~~not expected to have a material impact on Kentucky Bancshares consolidated financial statements.~~

~~ASU 2017-04 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment:~~ In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, under the new guidance, an entity is to perform its annual goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge would be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019, which for Kentucky Bancshares will be effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an impactfocused on the ~~Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~

~~ASU 2017-08 - Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees~~completion of its model, refining assumptions, and ~~Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities~~: ~~In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08 - Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.~~ This ASU amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. It shortens the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. Under current U.S. GAAP, premiums on callable debt securities generally are amortized to the maturity date. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, which for Kentucky Bancshares will be the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual periods. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~ASU 2016-18 - Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):~~ ~~Restricted Cash~~ ~~(a consensus~~continued review of the ~~FASB Emerging Issues Task Force):~~ ~~Effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,~~model. Concurrent with this, the Company is also focused on researching and ~~interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities,~~resolving interpretive accounting issues in the ~~amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,~~ASU, contemplating various related accounting policies, developing processes and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected asrelated controls, and considering various reporting disclosures.

As of the beginning of the ~~fiscal year~~first reporting period in which the new standard is effective, the Company expects to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment increasing the allowance for loan losses, if any, since the ASU covers credit losses over the expected life of a loan as well as considering future changes in macroeconomic conditions. The magnitude of any such one-time adjustment or the overall impact of the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements cannot yet be reasonably estimated, however, we expect to run multiple parallel models before finalizing the adjustment amount by December 31, 2022.

In December 2018, the OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the FDIC approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ implementation of CECL. The final rule provides banking organizations the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that ~~includes that interim period.~~ ~~The~~may result from the adoption of ~~this guidance is not~~the new accounting standard.

In 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved a delay for the implementation of the current expected credit loss standard until January 2023 for certain companies. The delay would apply to ~~have a material impact on~~smaller reporting companies (as defined by the ~~Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Update 2017-01 -~~ ~~Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business:~~ ~~The amendments in this ASU are intended to help~~SEC), non-SEC public companies and ~~other organizations evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals)~~private companies. The delayed implementation date of ~~assets or businesses.Public business entities should~~January 2023 will apply ~~the amendments in this Update~~ to ~~annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, which for~~ Kentucky Bancshares ~~will be the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018, including interim periods within those periods. All other entities should apply the amendments to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018,~~ and ~~interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019.~~

~~ASU 2017-09 - Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting: In May 2017, the FASB issued~~ ~~ASU 2017-09 - Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.~~ This ASU amends the guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual periods. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on Kentucky Bancshares consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities." Issued in August 2017, ASU 2017-12 aims to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 aim to better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships by expanding and refining hedge accounting for both non-financial and financial risk components and aligning the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

The amendments in ASU 2017-12 (i) permit hedge accounting for risk components in hedging relationships involving nonfinancial risk and interest rate risk; (ii) change the guidance for designating fair value hedges of interest rate risk and for measuring the change in fair value of the hedged item in fair value hedges of interest rate risk; (iii) continue to allow an entity to exclude option premiums and forward points from the assessment of hedge effectiveness; and (iv) permit an entity to exclude the portion of the change in fair value of a currency swap that is attributable to a cross-country basis spread from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The amendments of ASU 2017-12 also include targeted improvements intended to simplify the application of hedge accounting. The amendments of ASU 2017-12 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, which for Kentucky Bancshares is January 1, 2019. All transition requirements and elections must be applied to all hedging relationships existing at the date of adoption. Kentucky Bancshares plans to adopt ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of 2019 using the required modified retrospective transition method. Kentucky Bancshares is currently not impacted by ASU 2017-12. However, if the Company does become involved with derivatives or hedge accounting, the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of the change, if any, in the beginning balance of each affected component of equity as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU 2017-12 is not ~~expected~~intend to ~~have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~early adopt.

1118

Table of Contents

2.	SECURITIES

~~2.SECURITIES~~

SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

Period-end securities are as follows:

(in thousands)


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Available for Sale
June 30, 2020
U.S. treasury notes	$	9,120	$	174	$	—	$	9,294
U.S. government agencies		15,625		216		(15)		15,826
States and political subdivisions		47,681		1,152		(28)		48,805
Mortgage-backed - residential		97,870		2,096		(32)		99,934
Mortgage-backed - commercial		43,043		943		(15)		43,971
Asset-backed		34,995		33		(1,272)		33,756
Total	$	248,334	$	4,614	$	(1,362)	$	251,586

December 31, 2019
U.S. treasury notes	$	9,165	$	3	$	—	$	9,168
U.S. government agencies		23,716		60		(41)		23,735
States and political subdivisions		31,950		661		(22)		32,589
Mortgage-backed - residential		113,629		634		(272)		113,991
Mortgage-backed - commercial		50,092		406		(147)		50,351
Asset-backed		35,682		55		(241)		35,496
Total	$	264,234	$	1,819	$	(723)	$	265,330

Gross

Gross


Amortized

Unrealized

Unrealized

Fair

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

Available for Sale

September 30, 2017

U. S. government agencies

$
30,391

$
448

$
(179)

$
30,660

States and political subdivisions

100,195

2,254

(158)

102,291

Mortgage-backed - residential

157,739

330

(1,406)

156,663

Equity securities

320

22

—

342

Total

$
288,645

$
3,054

$
(1,743)

$
289,956

December 31, 2016

U. S. government agencies

$
36,454

$
373

$
(299)

$
36,528

States and political subdivisions

90,117

1,731

(716)

91,132

Mortgage-backed - residential

148,327

120

(2,677)

145,770

Equity securities

320

20

—

340

Total

$
275,218

$
2,244

$
(3,692)

$
273,770

The amortized cost and fair value of securities ~~September~~as of June 30, ~~2017~~2020 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity are shown separately. Further discussion concerning Fair Value Measurements can be found in Note 9.7.


	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value

					Amortized		Fair
					Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	384	$	384	$	8,033	$	8,086
Due after one year through five years		25,963		26,669		17,898		18,235
Due after five years through ten years		40,893		41,554		19,364		19,899
Due after ten years		63,346		64,344		27,131		27,705
		130,586		132,951
						72,426		73,925
Mortgage-backed - residential		157,739		156,663		97,870		99,934
Equity		320		342
Mortgage-backed - commercial						43,043		43,971
Asset-backed						34,995		33,756
Total	$	288,645	$	289,956	$	248,334	$	251,586

Proceeds from ~~sales~~the sale of available for sale securities ~~during~~for the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2020 and ~~2016~~June 30, 2019 were ~~$14.6~~$17.1 million and ~~$23.9~~$29.7 million. Gross gains of ~~$105~~$390 thousand and ~~$317~~$154 thousand and gross losses of $2$46 thousand and $0$40 thousand were realized on those sales, respectively. The tax provision related to these realized net gains was ~~$35~~$72 thousand and ~~$108~~$24 thousand, respectively.

Proceeds from ~~sales~~the sale of available for sale securities ~~during~~for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2019 were ~~$10.5~~$15.0 million and ~~$2.5~~$13.4 million. Gross gains of ~~$60~~$272 thousand and ~~$40~~$45 thousand and gross losses of $2$40 thousand and $0$25 thousand were realized on those sales, respectively. The tax provision related to these realized net gains or losses was ~~$20~~$49 thousand and ~~$14~~$4 thousand, respectively.

1219

Table of Contents

Securities with unrealized losses at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 not recognized in income are as follows:

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 (in thousands)


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Value		Loss
U.S. government agencies	$	—	$	—	$	870	$	(15)	$	870	$	(15)
States and political subdivisions		4,704		(28)		—		—		4,704		(28)
Mortgage-backed - residential		11,612		(32)		—		—		11,612		(32)
Mortgage-backed - commercial		—		—		5,134		(15)		5,134		(15)
Asset-backed		24,135		(871)		6,646		(401)		30,781		(1,272)
Total temporarily impaired	$	40,451	$	(931)	$	12,650	$	(431)	$	53,101	$	(1,362)

Less than 12 Months

12 Months or More

Total


Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Description of Securities

Value

Loss

Value

Loss

Value

Loss

U.S. Government agencies

$
15,617

$
(79)

$
6,056

$
(100)

$
21,673

$
(179)

States and municipals

16,449

(110)

2,271

(48)

18,720

(158)

Mortgage-backed - residential

54,303

(385)

44,469

(1,021)

98,772

(1,406)

Total temporarily impaired

$
86,369

$
(574)

$
52,796

$
(1,169)

$
139,165

$
(1,743)

December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (in thousands)


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Value		Loss
U.S. government agencies	$	6,171	$	(18)	$	4,396	$	(23)	$	10,567	$	(41)
States and political subdivisions		859		(3)		1,199		(19)		2,058		(22)
Mortgage-backed - residential		32,718		(129)		14,583		(143)		47,301		(272)
Mortgage-backed - commercial		5,760		(25)		10,625		(122)		16,385		(147)
Asset-backed		21,786		(150)		6,962		(91)		28,748		(241)
Total temporarily impaired	$	67,294	$	(325)	$	37,765	$	(398)	$	105,059	$	(723)

��

Less than 12 Months

12 Months or More

Total


Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Description of Securities

Value

Loss

Value

Loss

Value

Loss

U.S. Government agencies

$
28,202

$
(299)

$
—

$
—

$
28,202

$
(299)

States and municipals

27,834

(716)

—

—

27,834

(716)

Mortgage-backed - residential

119,802

(1,938)

13,652

(739)

133,454

(2,677)

Total temporarily impaired

$
175,838

$
(2,953)

$
13,652

$
(739)

$
189,490

$
(3,692)

The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, we may consider many factors including, (1) whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, (2) whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, (3) the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition and near-term prospects, (4) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, and (5) whether we intend to sell the investment security or more likely than not will be required to sell the investment security before its anticipated recovery.

Unrealized losses on securities included in the tables above have not been recognized into income because (1) all rated securities are investment grade and are of high credit quality, (2) management does not intend to sell and it is more likely than not that management would not be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery, (3) management believes the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in interest rates and (4) management believes the declines in fair value are temporary. The Company believes the fair value will recover as the securities approach maturity.

LOANS

~~TRADING ASSETS~~

The trading assets, which totaled $5.7 million at September 30, 2017 and $5.6 million at December 31, 2016, are primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents and municipal securities which are generally held for 60 days or less.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~3.LOANS~~

Loans at period-end are as follows:

(in thousands)


	6/30/2020		12/31/2019
Commercial	$	132,099	$	86,552
Real estate construction		25,136		32,219
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		295,326		291,419
Multi-family residential		49,208		48,622
Non-farm & non-residential		226,467		204,908
Agricultural		57,528		57,166
Consumer		22,507		23,122
Other		196		305
Total	$	808,467	$	744,313

9/30/2017

12/31/2016

Commercial

$
75,061

$
77,436

Real estate construction

34,289

29,169

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

242,152

244,638

Multi-family residential

41,498

47,199

Non-farm & non-residential

179,399

176,024

Agricultural

58,930

62,491

Consumer

17,520

18,867

Other

116

183

Total

$
648,965

$
656,007

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had outstanding loan balances of $56.8 million for “PPP” loans which were included in commercial loans in the table above. These loans required no allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2020.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the ~~nine~~six month ~~and three month periods~~period indicated was as follows:


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	(in thousands)
	Beginning								Ending
	Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance
					��

											Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
											(in thousands)
											Beginning								Ending
											Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance
Commercial	$	789	$	(35)	$	17	$	161	$	932	$	920	$	(25)	$	12	$	24	$	931
Real estate Construction		564		—		1		120		685		551		—		—		(85)		466
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,301		(203)		8		248		2,354		2,901		(35)		18		467		3,351
Multi-family residential		581		—		10		39		630		807		—		—		107		914
Non-farm & non-residential		1,203		(78)		—		304		1,429		1,643		—		—		1,397		3,040
Agricultural		856		—		47		(420)		483		389		—		3		92		484
Consumer		547		(128)		34		80		533		506		(214)		25		213		530
Other		60		(682)		573		91		42		43		(399)		419		(33)		30
Unallocated		640		—		—		27		667		700		—		—		(57)		643
	$	7,541	$	(1,126)	$	690	$	650	$	7,755
											$	8,460	$	(673)	$	477	$	2,125	$	10,389

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

(in thousands)

Beginning

Ending


Balance

Charge-offs

Recoveries

Provision

Balance

Commercial

$
1,006

$
(20)

$
2

$
(56)

$
932

Real estate construction

584

—

—

101

685

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

2,575

(170)

3

(54)

2,354

Multi-family residential

645

—

3

(18)

630

Non-farm & non-residential

1,322

(78)

—

185

1,429

Agricultural

504

—

19

(40)

483

Consumer

561

(26)

6

(8)

533

Other

76

(214)

172

8

42

Unallocated

685

—

—

(18)

667

$
7,958

$
(508)

$
205

$
100

$
7,755


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
	(in thousands)
	Beginning								Ending
	Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance
Commercial	$	1,003	$	—	$	6	$	(78)	$	931
Real estate construction		631		—		—		(165)		466
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		3,421		—		3		(73)		3,351
Multi-family residential		1,024		—		—		(110)		914
Non-farm & non-residential		2,104		—		—		936		3,040
Agricultural		463		—		1		20		484
Consumer		533		(104)		16		85		530
Other		31		(162)		213		(52)		30
Unallocated		706		—		—		(63)		643
	$	9,916	$	(266)	$	239	$	500	$	10,389

1421

Table of Contents

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

(in thousands)

Beginning

Ending


Balance

Charge-offs

Recoveries

Provision

Balance

Commercial

$
486

$
—

$
37

$
164

$
687

Real estate Construction

411

—

15

153

579

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

2,081

(90)

8

252

2,251

Multi-family residential

458

—

7

111

576

Non-farm & non-residential

1,213

—

355

(355)

1,213

Agricultural

678

  (3)

35

118

828

Consumer

525

(210)

77

163

555

Other

60

(705)

583

124

62

Unallocated

609

—

—

45

654

$
6,521

$
(1,008)

$
1,117

$
775

$
7,405


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
	(in thousands)
	Beginning								Ending
	Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance
Commercial	$	1,159	$	(191)	$	10	$	(16)	$	962
Real estate Construction		414		—		—		(1)		413
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,605		(104)		12		253		2,766
Multi-family residential		733		—		—		10		743
Non-farm & non-residential		1,649		(17)		—		(33)		1,599
Agricultural		420		—		4		(7)		417
Consumer		410		(140)		17		105		392
Other		58		(440)		348		138		104
Unallocated		679		—		—		1		680
	$	8,127	$	(892)	$	391	$	450	$	8,076


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
	(in thousands)
	Beginning								Ending
	Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance


											Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
											(in thousands)
											Beginning								Ending
											Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance
Commercial	$	666	$	—	$	3	$	18	$	687	$	943	$	—	$	3	$	16	$	962
Real estate Construction		552		—		2		25		579		351		—		—		62		413
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,304		(26)		1		(28)		2,251		2,660		(5)		4		107		2,766
Multi-family residential		507		—		3		66		576		723		—		—		20		743
Non-farm & non-residential		1,158		—		82		(27)		1,213		1,609		—		—		(10)		1,599
Agricultural		801		(3)		12		18		828		406		—		3		8		417
Consumer		550		(47)		7		45		555		389		(79)		3		79		392
Other		50		(206)		143		75		62		70		(199)		139		94		104
Unallocated		671		—		—		(17)		654		731		—		—		(51)		680
	$	7,259	$	(282)	$	253	$	175	$	7,405
											$	7,882	$	(283)	$	152	$	325	$	8,076

~~Table of Contents~~

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment (excluding accrued interest receivable amounting to ~~$2.4~~$4.0 million as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~$2.4~~$2.8 million at December 31, ~~2016)~~2019) in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2019:

Individually

Collectively

Purchased


As of September 30, 2017

Evaluated for

Evaluated for

Credit

(in thousands)

Impairment

Impairment

Impaired

Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:

Commercial

$
—

$
932

$
—

$
932

Real estate construction

—

685

—

685

Real estate mortgage:

—

1-4 family residential

68

2,286

—

2,354

Multi-family residential

—

630

—

630

Non-farm & non-residential

—

1,429

—

1,429

Agricultural

—

483

—

483

Consumer

—

533

—

533

Other

—

42

—

42

Unallocated

—

667

—

667

$
68

$
7,687

$
—

$
7,755

Loans:

Commercial

$
—

$
75,061

$
—

$
75,061

Real estate construction

—

34,289

—

34,289

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

420

240,836

896

242,152

Multi-family residential

—

40,924

574

41,498

Non-farm & non-residential

1,133

178,263

3

179,399

Agricultural

286

58,460

184

58,930

Consumer

—

17,520

—

17,520

Other

—

116

—

116

$
1,839

$
645,469

$
1,657

$
648,965

Individually

Collectively

Purchased


As of December 31, 2016

Evaluated for

Evaluated for

Credit

(in thousands)

Impairment

Impairment

Impaired

Total

Allowance for Loan Losses:

Commercial

$
—

$
789

$
—

$
789

Real estate construction

—

564

—

564

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

99

2,202

—

2,301

Multi-family residential

—

581

—

581

Non-farm & non-residential

15

1,188

—

1,203

Agricultural

427

429

—

856

Consumer

—

547

—

547

Other

—

60

—

60

Unallocated

—

640

—

640

$
541

$
7,000

$
—

$
7,541

Loans:

Commercial

$
97

$
77,339

$
—

77,436

Real estate construction

153

29,016

—

29,169

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

2,704

240,906

1,028

244,638

Multi-family residential

—

46,637

562

47,199

Non-farm & non-residential

1,725

174,154

145

176,024

Agricultural

3,315

58,998

178

62,491

Consumer

—

18,867

—

18,867

Other

—

183

—

183

        Total

$
7,994

$
646,100

$
1,913

$
656,007

1622

Table of Contents


	Individually		Collectively
As of June 30, 2020	Evaluated for		Evaluated for
(in thousands)	Impairment		Impairment		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Commercial	$	50	$	881	$	931
Real estate construction		—		466		466
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		—		3,351		3,351
Multi-family residential		75		839		914
Non-farm & non-residential		900		2,140		3,040
Agricultural		—		484		484
Consumer		—		530		530
Other		—		30		30
Unallocated		—		643		643
	$	1,025	$	9,364	$	10,389
Loans:
Commercial	$	144	$	131,955	$	132,099
Real estate construction		374		24,762		25,136
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		533		294,793		295,326
Multi-family residential		1,292		47,916		49,208
Non-farm & non-residential		1,799		224,668		226,467
Agricultural		3,580		53,948		57,528
Consumer		—		22,507		22,507
Other		—		196		196
Total	$	7,722	$	800,745	$	808,467


	Individually		Collectively
As of December 31, 2019	Evaluated for		Evaluated for
(in thousands)	Impairment		Impairment		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Commercial	$	—	$	920	$	920
Real estate construction		—		551		551
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2		2,899		2,901
Multi-family residential		50		757		807
Non-farm & non-residential		—		1,643		1,643
Agricultural		—		389		389
Consumer		—		506		506
Other		—		43		43
Unallocated		—		700		700
	$	52	$	8,408	$	8,460
Loans:
Commercial	$	—	$	86,552	$	86,552
Real estate construction		374		31,845		32,219
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		202		291,217		291,419
Multi-family residential		1,292		47,330		48,622
Non-farm & non-residential		1,799		203,109		204,908
Agricultural		842		56,324		57,166
Consumer		—		23,122		23,122
Other		—		305		305
Total	$	4,509	$	739,804	$	744,313

Table of Contents

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of and for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 (in thousands):


	Unpaid				Allowance for		Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Principal		Recorded		Loan Losses		Recorded		Income		Interest
	Balance		Investment		Allocated		Investment		Recognized		Recognized

													Unpaid				Allowance for		Average		Interest		Cash Basis
													Principal		Recorded		Loan Losses		Recorded		Income		Interest
													Balance		Investment		Allocated		Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Non-farm & non-residential	$	1,133	$	1,133	$	—	$	1,243	$	42	$	42
Agricultural		286		286		—		410		9		9


With an allowance recorded:
Commercial													$	94	$	94	$	—	$	47	$	1	$	1
Real estate construction														374		374		—		374		—		—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		420		420		68		1,045		8		8		533		533		—		368		12		12
Agricultural														3,580		3,580		—		2,211		32		32

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial													$	50	$	50	$	50	$	25	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
Multi-family residential														1,292		1,292		75		1,292		—		—
Non-farm and non-residential														1,799		1,799		900		900		—		—
Total	$	1,839	$	1,839	$	68	$	2,699	$	59	$	59	$	7,722	$	7,722	$	1,025	$	5,217	$	44	$	44

The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and loan origination fees, net due to immateriality.

The following ~~table presents~~tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~

Year to Date

Year to Date

Average

Interest

Cash Basis

Recorded

Income

Interest

(in thousands):

Investment

Recognized

Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

Real estate mortgage:

Construction

$
171

$
37

$
37

Agricultural

436

21

21

With an allowance recorded:

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

989

47

47

Non-farm & non-residential

1,983

70

70

Agricultural

3,868

—

—

Total

$
7,447

$
175

$
175

2019. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and loan origination fees, net, due to ~~immateriality.~~immateriality:


			Year to Date		Year to Date
	Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Recorded		Income		Interest
(in thousands):	Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real-estate construction	$	374	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		122		7		7
Multi-family residential		1,633		54		54
Non-farm and non-residential		114		5		5
Agricultural		845		10		10

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential	$	1,001	$	10	$	10
Total	$	4,089	$	86	$	86

1724

Table of Contents

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of and for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (in thousands):

Unpaid

Allowance for

Average

Interest

Cash Basis

Principal

Recorded

Loan Losses

Recorded

Income

Interest


Balance

Investment

Allocated

Investment

Recognized

Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

Commercial

$
97

$
97

$
—

$
48

$
30

$
30

Real-estate construction

153

153

494

9

9

Real-estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

Non-farm & non-residential

606

606

—

488

—

—

Agricultural

654

654

—

561

—

—

With an allowance recorded:

Real estate mortgage

1-4 family residential

2,098

2,098

99

1,590

56

56

Non-farm & non-residential

1,725

1,725

15

2,303

71

71

Agricultural

2,661

2,661

427

3,309

25

25

Total

$
7,994

$
7,994

$
541

$
8,793

$
191

$
191

. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and loan origination fees, net, due to ~~immateriality.~~ immateriality:


	Unpaid				Allowance for		Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Principal		Recorded		Loan Losses		Recorded		Income		Interest
	Balance		Investment		Allocated		Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real-estate construction	$	374	$	374	$	—	$	374	$	—	$	—
Real-estate mortgage:
Non-farm & non-residential		1,799		1,799		—		1,013		17		17
Agricultural		842		842		—		1,003		18		18

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage
1-4 family residential	$	202	$	202	$	2	$	603	$	35	$	35
Multi-family residential		1,292		1,292		50		646		54		54
Total	$	4,509	$	4,509	$	52	$	3,639	$	124	$	124

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2019:

Three Months Ending September 30, 2017

Average

Interest

Cash Basis

Recorded

Income

Interest

(in thousands):

Investment

Recognized

Recognized

With no related allowance recorded:

Real estate mortgage:

Non-farm & non-residential

$
2,431

$
17

$
17

Agricultural

491

2

2

With an allowance recorded:

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

455

1

1

$
3,377

$
20

$
20


	Three Months Ending September 30, 2016
	Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Recorded		Income		Interest
	Investment		Recognized		Recognized

							Three Months Ending June 30, 2020
							Average		Interest		Cash Basis
							Recorded		Income		Interest
(in thousands):							Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Construction	$	167	$	10	$	10
Agricultural		654		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial							$	47	$	1	$	1
Real estate construction								374		—		—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		949		17		17		447		6		6
Non-farm & non-residential		2,094		21		21
Agricultural		3,824		—		—		2,384		21		21

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial							$	25	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
Multi-family residential								1,292		—		—
Non-farm and non-residential								900		—		—
Total	$	7,688	$	48	$	48	$	5,469	$	28	$	28


	Three Months Ending June 30, 2019
	Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Recorded		Income		Interest
	Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real-estate construction	$	374	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		222		3		3
Multi-family residential		1,622		10		10
Non-farm and non-residential		138		—		—
Agricultural		527		6		6

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential	$	1,127	$	3	$	3
Total	$	4,010	$	22	$	22

1825

Table of Contents

The following tables present the recorded investment in nonaccrual, loans past due over 9089 days still on accrual and accruing troubled debt restructurings by class of loans as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2019:


			Loans Past Due
			Over 90 Days
As of September 30, 2017			Still		Troubled Debt

									Loans Past Due
									Over 89 Days
As of June 30, 2020									Still		Troubled Debt
(in thousands)	Nonaccrual		Accruing		Restructurings		Nonaccrual		Accruing		Restructurings
Commercial	$	—	$	32	$	—	$	—	$	48	$	—
Real estate construction		—		67		—		374		—		—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		1,213		47		—		903		—		—
Multi-family residential								1,292		—		—
Non-farm & non-residential		—		—		—		1,951		14		—
Agricultural		150		—		—		—		200		—
Consumer		30		5		—		38		2		—
Total	$	1,393	$	151	$	—	$	4,558	$	264	$	—


			Loans Past Due
			Over 90 Days
As of December 31, 2016			Still		Troubled Debt

									Loans Past Due
									Over 89 Days
As of December 31, 2019									Still		Troubled Debt
(in thousands)	Nonaccrual		Accruing		Restructurings		Nonaccrual		Accruing		Restructurings
Commercial	$	3	$	11	$	—
Real estate construction		—		153		—	$	374	$	—	$	—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,725		31		338		845		47		—
Multi-family residential		25		—		—		—		1,292		—
Non-farm & non-residential		272		—		1,725		1,799		121		—
Agricultural		1,541		724		—		—		7		—
Consumer		—		8		—		63		32		—
Total	$	4,566	$	927	$	2,063	$	3,081	$	1,499	$	—

Nonaccrual loans secured by real estate make up ~~97.0%~~99.2% of the total nonaccrual loan balances at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90over 89 days and still ~~on accrual~~accruing include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. All amounts due according to the contractual terms means that both the contractual interest payments and the contractual principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement.

Nonaccrual loans are loans for which payments in full of principal or interest is not expected or which principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the asset is both well secured and in the process of collection. Other impaired loans may be loans showing signs of weakness or interruptions in cash flow, but ultimately are current or less than 90 days past due with respect to principal and interest and for which we anticipate full payment of principal and interest but not in accordance with contractual terms.

Additional factors considered by management in determining impairment and non-accrual status include payment status, collateral value, availability of current financial information, and the probability of collecting all contractual principal and interest payments.

1926

Table of Contents

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due and non-accrual loans as ~~of September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 by class of loans:


	30–59		60–89		Greater than				Total
As of September 30, 2017	Days		Days		90 Days				Past Due &		Loans Not

													30–59		60–89		Greater than				Total
As of June 30, 2020													Days		Days		89 Days				Past Due &		Loans Not
(in thousands)	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Non-accrual		Non-accrual		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Non-accrual		Non-accrual		Past Due

Commercial	$	95	$	—	$	32	$	—	$	127	$	74,934	$	301	$	—	$	48	$	—	$	349	$	131,750
Real estate construction		—		—		67		—		67		34,222		—		—		—		374		374		24,762
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		1,512		706		47		1,213		3,478		238,674		344		422		—		903		1,669		293,657
Multi-family residential		—		—		—		—		—		41,498		—		—		—		1,292		1,292		47,916
Non-farm & non-residential		192		—		—		—		192		179,207		406		319		14		1,951		2,690		223,777
Agricultural		151		—		—		150		301		58,629		412		—		200		—		612		56,916
Consumer		95		10		5		30		140		17,380		69		14		2		38		123		22,384
Other		—		—		—		—		—		116		—		—		—		—		—		196
Total	$	2,045	$	716	$	151	$	1,393	$	4,305	$	644,660	$	1,532	$	755	$	264	$	4,558	$	7,109	$	801,358


	30–59		60–89		Greater than				Total
As of December 31, 2016	Days		Days		90 Days				Past Due &		Loans Not

													30–59		60–89		Greater than				Total
As of December 31, 2019													Days		Days		89 Days				Past Due &		Loans Not
(in thousands)	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Non-accrual		Non-accrual		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Non-accrual		Non-accrual		Past Due

Commercial	$	54	$	45	$	11	$	3	$	113	$	77,323	$	326	$	25	$	—	$	—	$	351	$	86,201
Real estate construction		—		—		153		—		153		29,016		—		—		—		374		374		31,845
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,310		228		31		2,725		5,294		239,344		2,734		274		47		845		3,900		287,519
Multi-family residential		391		3		—		25		419		46,780		—		—		1,292		—		1,292		47,330
Non-farm & non-residential		159		61		—		272		492		175,532		302		19		121		1,799		2,241		202,667
Agricultural		647		61		724		1,541		2,973		59,518		704		—		7		—		711		56,455
Consumer		97		37		8		—		142		18,725		158		17		32		63		270		22,852
Other		—		—		—		—		—		183		—		—		—		—		—		305
Total	$	3,658	$	435	$	927	$	4,566	$	9,586	$	646,421	$	4,224	$	335	$	1,499	$	3,081	$	9,139	$	735,174

Troubled Debt Restructurings:

Management periodically reviews renewals and modifications of previously identified ~~TDRs,~~troubled debt restructurings (TDR), for which there was no principal forgiveness, to consider if it is appropriate to remove the TDR classification. If the borrower is no longer experiencing financial difficulty and the renewal/modification did not contain a concessionary interest rate or other concessionary terms, management considers the potential removal of the TDR classification. If deemed appropriate based upon current underwriting, the TDR classification is removed as the borrower has complied with the terms of the loan at the date of renewal/modification and there was a reasonable expectation that the borrower will continue to comply with the terms of the loan after the date of the renewal/modification.

Additionally, TDR classification can be removed in circumstances in which the Company performs a non-concessionary re-modification of the loan at terms considered to be at market for loans with comparable risk and management expects the borrower will continue to perform under the re-modified terms based on the borrower's past history of performance. ~~In July 2017,~~

On March 22, 2020, the Interagency Statement was issued by our banking regulators that encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations due to the effects of COVID-19. Additionally, Section 4013 of the CARES Act further provides that a qualified loan modification is exempt by law from classification as a TDR ~~classification was removed~~as defined by GAAP, from ~~one loan that met~~ the ~~requirements as discussed above. This loans totaled $1.7 million at~~period beginning March 1, 2020 until the earlier of December 31, ~~2016. This~~2020 or the date that is 60 days after the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 outbreak declared by the President of the United States under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) terminates. The Interagency Statement was subsequently revised in April 2020 to clarify the interaction of the original guidance with Section 4013 of the CARES Act, as well as setting forth the banking regulators’ views on consumer protection considerations. In accordance with such guidance, we are offering short-term modifications made in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who are current and otherwise not past due.

Table of Contents

The majority of the loan ~~is no longer evaluated individually~~modifications we made for ~~impairment.~~customers involved three to six month forbearance payments which were added to the end of the note. As of June 30, 2020 we had approved modifications on approximately $115 million of outstanding loan balances.

The Company had no0 loans classified as troubled debt restructurings as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017. The Company allocated $40 thousand for specific reserves to customers whose loan terms had been modified in troubled debt restructuring as of~~2020 or December 31, ~~2016.~~ 2019.

~~The Company has not committed to lend additional amounts as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~No loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings during the first nine months ended of 2017 or 2016.~~

Credit Quality Indicators:

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have one or more potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined and documented weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:


As of September 30, 2017			Special

As of June 30, 2020											Special
(in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful

Commercial	$	73,482	$	1,537	$	42	$	—	$	129,902	$	2,116	$	81	$	—
Real estate construction		34,289		—		—		—		24,743		—		393		—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		233,723		3,806		4,577		46		285,940		3,392		5,994		—
Multi-family residential		38,195		3,303		—		—		46,985		931		1,292		—
Non-farm & non-residential		171,052		7,275		1,072		—		215,067		9,431		170		1,799
Agricultural		55,865		2,258		807		—		50,485		4,649		2,394		—

Total	$	606,606	$	18,179	$	6,498	$	46	$	753,122	$	20,519	$	10,324	$	1,799


As of December 31, 2016			Special

As of December 31, 2019											Special
(in thousands)	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful

Commercial	$	76,346	$	1,078	$	12	$	—	$	83,515	$	2,785	$	252	$	—
Real estate construction		28,577		—		592		—		30,462		1,363		394		—
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		232,969		4,031		7,627		11		283,048		3,435		4,932		4
Multi-family residential		43,681		2,617		901		—		43,193		4,137		1,292		—
Non-farm & non-residential		167,451		8,185		388		—		195,800		7,169		1,939		—
Agricultural		58,155		1,367		2,969		—		51,352		4,459		1,355		—

Total	$	607,179	$	17,278	$	12,489	$	11	$	687,370	$	23,348	$	10,164	$	4

2128

Table of Contents

For consumer loans, the Company evaluates the credit quality based on the aging of the recorded investment in loans, which was previously presented. Non-performing consumer loans are loans which are greater than 9089 days past due or on non-accrual status, and total ~~$35~~$40 thousand at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and $8$95 thousand at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

~~4.REAL ESTATE OWNED~~Non-consumer loans with an outstanding balance less than $200 thousand are evaluated similarly to consumer loans. Loan performance is evaluated based on delinquency status. Both are reviewed at least quarterly and credit quality grades are updated as needed.

~~Activity in real estate owned, net was as follows:~~

4.	EARNINGS PER SHARE

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

2017

2016

Beginning of year

$
1,824

$
2,347

Additions

1,897

193

Sales

(911)

(571)

Fair value adjustments

(141)

(131)

End of period

$
2,669

$
1,838

~~Activity in the valuation allowance was as follows:~~

2017

2016
Beginning of year

$
803

$
616
Fair value adjustments

141

131
Reductions from sale

(46)

—
End of Period

$
898

$
747

~~Expenses related to foreclosed assets include:~~

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Net (gain) loss on sales, included in other income on income statement

$
(11)

$
(163)

Fair value adjustments

141

131

Operating expenses, net of rental income

148

91

Repossession expense, net

289

222

Net expense, net of gain or loss on sales, for the period

$
278

$
59

Three Months Ended

September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Net (gain) loss on sales, included in other income on income statement

$
6

$
(163)

Fair value adjustments

103

46

Operating expenses, net of rental income

1

33

Repossession expense, net

104

79

Net expense, net of gain or loss on sales, for the period

$
110

$
(84)

~~Table of Contents~~

~~5.EARNINGS PER SHARE~~

Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock based compensation agreements.

The factors used in the earnings per share computation follow:

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)
Basic Earnings Per Share

Net Income

$
8,139

$
6,284
Weighted average common shares outstanding

2,955

2,975
Basic earnings per share

$
2.74

$
2.10

Diluted Earnings Per Share

Net Income

$
8,139

$
6,284
Weighted average common shares outstanding

2,955

2,975
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding

2,956

2,975
Diluted earnings per share

$
2.74

$
2.10


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019

	(in thousands)
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net Income	$	4,824	$	6,048
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,890		5,937
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.81	$	1.01

Three Months Ended

September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)
Basic Earnings Per Share

Net Income

$
2,592

$
2,365
Weighted average common shares outstanding

2,955

2,976
Basic earnings per share

$
0.87

$
0.79

Diluted Earnings Per Share

Net Income

$
2,592

$
2,365
Weighted average common shares outstanding

2,955

2,976
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding

2,956

2,976
Diluted earnings per share

$
0.87

$
0.79


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019

	(in thousands)
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net Income	$	3,073	$	3,237
Weighted average common shares outstanding		5,892		5,937
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.51	$	0.54

~~Stock options for 0 shares of common~~Restricted stock ~~for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2017 and 1,200 shares of common stock for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2016~~grants were excluded ~~from~~in shares outstanding for purposes of computing basic and diluted earnings per share ~~because their impact was antidilutive.~~for the both the six months ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019.

5.	STOCK COMPENSATION

~~6.STOCK COMPENSATION~~

We have ~~four~~3 stock based compensation plans as described below.

~~Two Stock Option Plans~~

Under its expired 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Company has granted certain officers and key employees stock option awards which vest and become fully exercisable at the end of five years and provided for issuance of up to 100,000 options. Under the expired 1993 Non-Employee Directors Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, the Company also granted certain directors stock option awards which vest and become fully exercisable immediately and provided for issuance of up to 20,000 options. For each Stock Option Plan, the exercise price of each option which has a ten year life, was equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Summary of activity in the stock option plan for the first nine months of 2017 follows:~~

Weighted


Weighted

Average

Aggregate

Average

Remaining

Intrinsic

Exercise

Contractual

Value

Shares

Price

Term

(in thousands)
Outstanding, beginning of year

1,200

$
31.00

Granted

—

—

—
Forfeited or expired

—

—

—
Exercised

(600)

31.00

Outstanding, end of period

600

$
31.00

5 months

$
6
Vested and expected to vest

600

$
31.00

5 months

$
6
Exercisable, end of period

600

$
31.00

5 months

$
6

~~(1)~~

~~Aggregate intrinsic value in thousands~~

As of September 30, 2017, there was $0 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan. Since both stock option plans have expired, neither plan allows for additional options to be issued.

2005 Restricted Stock Grant Plan

On May 10, 2005, the Company’s stockholders approved a restricted stock grant plan. Total shares issuable under the plan were ~~50,000.~~100,000. There were no0 shares issued during ~~the first nine months of 2017~~2020 or ~~2016.~~2019. The plan is now expired and no0 additional shares will be issued from the 2005 plan. There were ~~117~~0 shares forfeited during the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2020 and ~~639~~12 shares were forfeited during the ~~first nine~~six months ~~2016.~~ended June 30, 2019.

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested shares for the year ~~follows:~~follows (in thousands, except per share data):


			Grant-Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2020	1,580	$	13.67
Vested	(1,580)		13.67
Nonvested at June 30, 2020	—	$	—

Weighted-Average

Fair

Grant-Date

Value

Nonvested Shares

Shares

  Fair Value

Per Share

Nonvested at January 1, 2017

10,636

$
253,518

$
23.84

Granted

—

—

—

Vested

(4,348)

(97,747)

22.48

Forfeited

(117)

(3,004)

—

Nonvested at September 30, 2017

6,171

$
152,767

$
24.76

~~(1) Grant date fair value in thousands~~

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, there was ~~$99 thousand of total~~0 unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares granted under the ~~restricted stock grant plan. The cost is expected~~2005 Restricted Stock Grant due to ~~be recognized over a weighted-average period~~their being 0 nonvested shares outstanding.

Table of ~~1.8 years. As of September 30, 2017, no additional shares are available for issuance under the restricted stock grant plan.~~Contents

2009 Stock Award Plan

On May 13, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved a stock award plan that provides for the granting of both incentive and nonqualified stock options and other share based awards. Total shares issuable under the plan ~~are 150,000.~~were 300,000. There were ~~6,575~~0 shares issued during the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2020 and ~~6,170~~23,380 shares were issued during the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2016.~~ended June 30, 2019. The plan is now expired and 0 additional shares will be issued from the 2009 plan. There were ~~951~~300 shares forfeited during the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2020 and ~~360~~108 shares were forfeited during the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2016.~~ended June 30, 2019.

~~Table of Contents~~

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested shares for the year ~~follows:~~follows (in thousands, except per share data):



			Weighted-Average
			Grant-Date
Nonvested Shares	Shares		Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2020	38,482	$	21.46
Vested	(12,855)		20.98
Forfeited	(300)		21.37
Nonvested at June 30, 2020	25,327	$	21.70

Weighted-Average

Fair

Grant-Date

Value

Nonvested Shares

Shares

   Fair Value

Per Share

Nonvested at January 1, 2017

7,297

$
213,853

$
29.31

Granted

6,575

213,688

32.50

Vested

(1,648)

(47,988)

29.12

Forfeited

(951)

(30,463)

32.03

Nonvested at September 30, 2017

11,273

$
349,090

$
30.97

~~(1)~~

~~Grant date fair value in thousands~~

2019 Stock Award Plan

On May 21, 2019, the Company’s stockholders approved a stock award plan that provides for the granting of ~~September 30, 2017, there was $292 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested~~both incentive and nonqualified stock options and other share based awards. Total shares ~~granted~~issuable under the ~~restricted stock grant plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.7 years. As of September~~plan are 300,000. There were 30,030 shares issued during the six months ended June 30, ~~2017, 133,368,~~2020 and 0 shares ~~are still available for issuance.~~were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2019. There were 180 shares forfeited during the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 0 shares forfeited during the six months ended June 30, 2019.


		Weighted-Average
		Grant-Date
Nonvested Shares	Shares	Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2020	—	$	—
Granted	30,030		23.11
Forfeited	(180)		(23.11)
Nonvested at June 30, 2020	29,850	$	23.11

~~7.REPURCHASE~~6. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

Repurchase agreements totaled ~~$24.1~~$4.3 million ~~at September~~as of June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Of this, ~~$18.1~~$3.3 million of balances were overnight obligations and ~~$6.0~~$1.0 million of balances had terms extending through May 2021 ~~and~~with a weighted remaining average life of ~~1.6~~0.9 years. The Company pledged ~~agencies~~both U.S. treasury securities and ~~mortgage-backed~~U.S. government agency securities with a combined total carrying amount of ~~$30.5~~$11.7 million to secure repurchase agreements as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

~~8.OTHER BORROWINGS~~

7.	FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

On July 20, 2015, the Company borrowed $5 million which had an outstanding balance of $3.8 million at September 30, 2017. The term loan has a fixed interest rate of 5.02%, requires quarterly principal and interest payments, matures July 20, 2025 and is collateralized by Kentucky Bank stock. The maturity schedule for the term loan as of September 30, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

2017

$
81

2018

399

2019

419

2020

441

2021

463

Thereafter

1,959

$
3,762

~~In addition, the Company also had $17.3 million in federal funds purchased at September 30, 2017.~~

~~9.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS~~

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and sets forth disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, allows entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any financial assets or liabilities.

Table of Contents

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This Topic describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

~~Table of Contents~~

Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value:

Investment Securities ~~and Trading Assets~~: The fair values for available for sale investment securities ~~and trading assets~~ are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3).

Impaired Loans: The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent third party real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available for similar loans and collateral underlying such loans.

~~Adjustments~~Net adjustments totaled ~~$68~~$973 thousand the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 and $0$(193) thousand for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016~~2019 and resulted in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Net adjustments totaled $950 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and $(11) thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and resulted in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted in accordance with the allowance policy.

~~Other Real Estate Owned~~: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure and classified as other real estate owned (OREO) are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals which are updated no less frequently than annually. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach with data from comparable properties. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments were $141 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and $131 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, and $103 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $46 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and resulted in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Real estate owned properties are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.

Mortgage Servicing Rights: Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income, resulting in a Level 3 classification.

Derivatives and Financial Instruments: The fair values of derivative financial instruments are based on derivative valuation models using market data inputs as of the valuation date (Level 2).

2631

Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:

Available for sale investment securities, derivatives and ~~trading~~other financial instrument assets and equity securities included in other assets are the Company’s only balance sheet items that meet the disclosure requirements for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Disclosures are as follows in the tables below.

Fair Value Measurements at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 (in thousands):


			Quoted Prices
			In Active
			Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs

											Quoted Prices
											In Active
											Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
											Identical		Observable		Unobservable
									Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial Assets
U.S. treasury notes									$	9,294	$	—	$	9,294	$	—
U. S. government agencies	$	30,660	$	—	$	30,660	$	—		15,826		—		15,826		—
States and municipals		102,291		—		102,291		—
States and political subdivisions										48,805		—		48,805		—
Mortgage-backed - residential		156,663		—		156,663		—		99,934		—		99,934		—
Equity securities		342		342		—		—
Trading Assets		5,714		1,959		3,755		—
Mortgage-backed-commercial										43,971		—		43,971		—
Asset-backed										33,756		—		33,756		—
Derivatives										473		—		473		—
Equity Securities										298		298		—		—
Total	$	295,670	$	2,301	$	293,369	$	—	$	252,357	$	298	$	252,059	$	—

Financial Liabilities
Derivatives									$	2,844	$	—	$	2,844	$	—

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (in thousands):


			Quoted Prices
			In Active
			Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs

											Quoted Prices
											In Active
											Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
											Identical		Observable		Unobservable
									Carrying		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
U.S. treasury notes									$	9,168	$	—	$	9,168	$	—
U. S. government agencies	$	36,528	$	—	$	36,528	$	—		23,735		—		23,735		—
States and municipals		91,132		—		91,132		—
States and political subdivisions										32,589		—		32,589		—
Mortgage-backed - residential		145,770		—		145,770		—		113,991		—		113,991		—
Equity securities		340		340		—		—
Trading Assets		5,592		1,608		3,984		—
Mortgage-backed - commercial										50,351		—		50,351		—
Asset-backed										35,496		—		35,496		—
Derivatives										94				94
Equity Securities										292		292		—		—
Total	$	279,362	$	1,948	$	277,414	$	—	$	265,716	$	292	$	265,424	$	—

Financial Liabilities
Derivatives									$	164	$	—	$	164	$	—

There were no0 transfers between level 1 and level 2 during ~~2017~~2020 or ~~2016.~~2019.

Table of Contents

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017 Using :
				Quoted Prices
				In Active
				Markets for		Significant Other	Significant
				Identical		Observable	Unobservable
	Carrying			Assets		Inputs	Inputs

									Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2020 Using :
												Quoted Prices
												In Active
												Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
												Identical		Observable		Unobservable
									Carrying			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(In thousands)	Value			(Level 1)		(Level 2)	(Level 3)		Value			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Description
Impaired loans:
Real Estate Mortgage:
1-4 family Residential	$	353	$	—	$	—	$	353
Real estate mortgage:
Multi-family residential									$	1,217	$	—	$	—	$		1,217
Non-farm & non-residential										899		—		—			899
Other real estate owned, net:
Residential		611		—		—		611
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential										73		—		—			73
Commercial		57		—		—		57		246		—		—			246
Agricultural										233		—		—			233
Mortgage servicing rights		1,310		—		—		1,310		1,335		—		—			1,335


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using :
				Quoted Prices
				In Active
				Markets for		Significant Other	Significant
				Identical		Observable	Unobservable
	Carrying			Assets		Inputs	Inputs
(In thousands)	Value			(Level 1)		(Level 2)	(Level 3)
Description
Impaired loans:
Real Estate Mortgage:
1-4 family residential	$	200	$	—	$	—	$	200
Multi-family residential		1,242		—		—		1,242
Other real estate owned, net:
Real Estate Mortgage:
1-4 family residential		40		—		—		40
Commercial		246		—		—		246
Agriculturual		233		—		—		233
Mortgage servicing rights		1,107		—		—		1,107

~~Table of Contents~~

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using :




Quoted Prices





In Active

Markets for

Significant Other

Significant

Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Carrying

Assets

Inputs

Inputs

(In thousands)

Value

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Description

Impaired loans:

Real Estate Mortgage:

1-4 family residential

$
1,685
$
—
$
—

$
1,685

Agricultural

2,234

—

—

2,234

Other real estate owned, net:

Residential

956

—

—

956

Commercial

272

—

272

Mortgage servicing rights

1,083

—

—

1,083

Impaired loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans had a carrying amount of $353 thousand, which includes a valuation allowance of $68 thousand at September 30, 2017. Impaired loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans had a net carrying amount of ~~$3.9~~$2.1 million, which includes a valuation allowance of $975 thousand as of June 30, 2020. Impaired loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans had a net carrying amount of $1.4 million, with a valuation allowance of ~~$502~~$52 thousand at December 31, ~~2016. One new~~2019.

Based on recent developments for 1 loan ~~became~~with an outstanding balance of $1.8 million and classified as non-farm and non-residential as of June 30, 2020, a specific valuation allowance of $900 thousand was deemed necessary as of June 30, 2020. Further, 1 additional loan was impaired ~~during~~at June 30, 2020 when compared to December 31, 2019 and required additional loan provision expense of $50 thousand for the ~~nine month and~~ three ~~month period ended September 30, 2017 which resulted in $68 thousand in additional provision for loan losses for impaired loans. For the nine~~ months and ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, no loans which became impaired during 2016, resulted in additional loan loss provision expense.~~ 2020.

Other real estate owned measured at fair value less costs to sell had a net carrying amount of ~~$668~~$552 thousand, which is made up of the outstanding cost balance of ~~$1.6~~$1.0 million, net of a valuation allowance of ~~$898~~$477 thousand ~~at September~~as of June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Other real estate owned which was measured at fair value less costs to sell, had a net carrying amount of ~~$1.6 million,~~$519 thousand, which was made up of the outstanding balance of ~~$2.4 million,~~$980 thousand, net of a valuation allowance of ~~$803~~$461 thousand at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The Company recorded ~~$141~~$38 thousand inexpense for write-downs of other real estate owned properties for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~both June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~$103 thousand for the three months ended September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The Company recorded ~~$131 thousand and $46 thousand in net~~0 write-downs of other real estate owned properties ~~during the nine months and~~for the three months ended ~~September~~both June 30, ~~2016.~~ 2020 and June 30, 2019.

Table of Contents

Impaired mortgage servicing rights ~~which~~ are carried at the lower of cost or fair ~~value, were carried at their fair value of $1.3~~value. At June 30 2020, impaired mortgage servicing rights totaled $1.8 million, ~~which is made up of the outstanding balance of $1.4 million, net of~~less a valuation allowance of ~~$86~~$446 thousand, ~~at September 30, 2017.~~ resulting in a net carrying value of $1.3 million.

At December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, impaired ~~loan~~mortgage servicing rights ~~were carried at their fair value of $1.1 million, which is made up of the outstanding balance of~~totaled $1.2 million, ~~net of~~less a valuation allowance of ~~$125~~$110 thousand, resulting in a carrying value of $1.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recorded net writedowns of $336 thousand. For the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017,~~ended June 30,2019, the Company recorded ~~a net recovery of prior write-downs of $40 thousand and~~ net write-downs of ~~$106 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~$41 thousand. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company recorded a net ~~recovery~~writedowns of ~~prior write-downs of $6 thousand compared to net write-downs of $64 thousand for~~$194 thousand. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~ June 30,2019, the Company recorded net write-downs of $35 thousand.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis ~~at September~~as of June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2019:

Range

September 30, 2017

Fair

Valuation

Unobservable

(Weighted

Range

June 30, 2020

Fair

Valuation

Unobservable

(Weighted

(In thousands)

Value

Technique(s)

Input(s)

Average)

Value

Technique(s)

Input(s)

Average)

Impaired loans

Real estate mortgage:

Multi-family residential

1,217

income approach

capitalization rate

7% - 7%

(7)%

Non-farm Non-residential

899

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

(50)% -(50)%

(50)%

Other real estate owned:

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

353

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

0%-12%

(6)%

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

(23)% - (28)%

(30)%

Other real estate owned:

Residential

611

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

1%-16%

(9)%

Commercial

income approach

capitalization rate

10%-10%

(10)%

246

income approach

capitalization rate

(6)% - 8%

(62)%

Mortgage Servicing Rights

1,310

discounted cash flow

constant prepayment rates

8%-50%

(11)%

Agricultural

233

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

(0)% - 26%

(14)%

Mortgage servicing rights

1,335

discounted cash flow

constant prepayment rates

(12)% - (24)%

(18)%

Range

December 31, 2016

Fair

Valuation

Unobservable

(Weighted

Range

December 31, 2019

Fair

Valuation

Unobservable

(Weighted

(In thousands)

Value

Technique(s)

Input(s)

Average)

Value

Technique(s)

Input(s)

Average)

Impaired loans

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

1,685

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

0%-21%

(10)%

200

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

(1)% - 21%

(1)%

Agricultural

2,234

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

2%-75%

(9)%

Multi-family residential

1,242

income approach

capitalization rate

7% - 7%

(7)%

Other real estate owned:

Residential

956

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

1%-16%

(9)%

Real estate mortgage:

1-4 family residential

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

(4%) - 11%

(29%)

Commercial

272

income approach

capitalization rate

10%-10%

(10)%

246

sales comparison

capitalization rate

(6%) - 8%

(62)%

Mortgage Servicing Rights

1,083

discounted cash flow

constant prepayment rates

8%-45%

(13)%

Agriculturual

233

sales comparison

adjustment for differences between the comparable sales

0% - 26%

(14)%

Mortgage servicing rights

1,107

discounted cash flow

constant prepayment rates

9% - 20%

(12)%

2934

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, ~~at September~~as of June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 are as follows:

~~September~~June 30, ~~2017:~~2020


	Carrying
(in thousands)	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	104,273	$	104,273	$	—	$	—	$	104,273
Interest bearing time deposits		2,274		2,274		—		—		2,274
Securities available for sale		251,586		—		251,586		—		251,586
Loans held for sale		6,178		—		6,338		—		6,338
Net Loans		798,078		—		—		792,183		792,183
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		7,072		—		—		—		N/A
Interest receivable		4,986		—		960		4,026		4,986
Derivatives		473		—		473		—		473
Equity securities		298		298		—		—		298

Financial liabilities
Total deposits	$	944,556	$	738,775	$	207,401	$	—	$	946,176
Repurchase agreements		4,308		—		4,315		—		4,315
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		50,500		—		50,500		—		50,500
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		94,905		—		97,922		—		97,922
Subordinated debentures		7,217		—		—		6,785		6,785
Interest payable		1,251		—		1,239		12		1,251
Derivatives		2,844		—		2,844		—		2,844

Carrying








(in thousands)

Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$
18,612

$
18,612

$
—

$
—

$
18,612

Interest bearing time deposits

1,830

1,830

—

—

1,830

Securities available for sale

289,956

342

289,614

—

289,956

Trading assets

5,714

1,959

3,755

—

5,714

Loans held for sale

1,316

—

1,350

—

1,350

Net Loans

641,210

—

—

640,915

640,915

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

7,034

—

—

—

N/A

Interest receivable

3,785

—

1,338

2,447

3,785

Financial liabilities

Total deposits

$
748,379

$
559,820

$
189,475

$
—

$
749,295

Federal funds purchased

17,302

17,302

—

—

17,302

Repurchase agreements

24,070

—

24,125

—

24,125

Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

8,530

—

8,532

—

8,532

Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

93,665

—

88,557

—

88,557

Note payable

3,762

4,208

4,208

Subordinated debentures

7,217

—

—

7,213

7,213

Interest payable

796

—

736

60

796

December 31, ~~2016:~~2019


	Carrying
(in thousands)	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,182	$	22,182	$	—	$	—	$	22,182
Interest bearing time deposits		2,375		2,375		—		—		2,375
Securities available for sale		265,330		—		265,330		—		265,330
Loans held for sale		2,144		—		2,171		—		2,171
Net Loans		735,853		—		—		735,060		735,060
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		7,034		—		—		—		N/A
Interest receivable		4,166		—		1,035		3,131		4,166
Derivatives		94		—		94		—		94
Equity securities		292		292		—		—		292

Financial liabilities
Total deposits	$	842,653	$	630,948	$	210,892	$	—	$	841,840
Repurchase agreements		5,994		—		5,993		—		5,993
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		25,000		—		25,000		—		25,000
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances		91,418		—		91,397		—		91,397
Subordinated debentures		7,217		—		—		7,213		7,213
Interest payable		1,170		—		1,156		14		1,170
Derivatives		164		—		164		—		164

Carrying








(in thousands)

Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$
43,250

$
43,250

$
—

$
—

$
43,250

Interest bearing time deposits

5,029

5,029

—

—

5,029

Securities available for sale

273,770

340

273,430

—

273,770

Trading assets

5,592

1,608

3,984

—

5,592

Loans held for sale

724

—

750

—

750

Net Loans

648,466

—

—

648,234

648,234

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

7,034

—

—

—

N/A

Interest receivable

3,715

—

1,334

2,381

3,715

Financial liabilities

Total deposits

$
802,981

$
607,617

$
195,528

$
—

$
803,145

Repurchase agreements

20,873

—

21,006

—

21,006

Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances

92,500

—

91,015

—

91,015

Note payable

4,090

—

4,564

—

4,564

Subordinated debentures

7,217

—

—

7,210

7,210

Interest payable

692

—

639

53

692

3035

Table of Contents

LEASES


	Statement of
	Financial Condition
	Location		6/30/2020		12/31/2019
			(in thousands)
Operating Lease Right of Use Asset:
Gross Carrying Amount		$	8,806	$	8,857
Accumulated Amortization			(919)		(662)
Net Book Value	Operating lease right of use asset	$	7,887	$	8,195

Operating Lease Liabilities
Right of use lease obligations	Operating lease liability	$	8,090	$	8,350

As of June 30, 2020, the weighted-average remaining lease term for operating leases was 34.9 years and the weighted- average discount rate used in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was 4.13%. The Company utilized the FHLB fixed rate advance rate as of December 31, 2018 for the term most closely aligning with the remaining lease term for lease obligations in existence as of December 31, 2018. The Company utilized the FHLB fixed rate advance rate as of April 30, 2019 as a basis for determining the discount rate for one contract which was entered into during April 2019.


	Six Months Ended
		6/30/2020		6/30/2019
		(in thousands)
Lease Cost:
Operating lease cost	$	140	$	111
Total lease cost	$	140	$	111

Other information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	102	$	130


	Three Months Ended
		6/30/2020		6/30/2019

		(in thousands)
Lease Cost:
Operating lease cost	$	158	$	136
Total lease cost	$	158	$	136

Other information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	131	$	93

Table of Contents

Maturity analysis of liabilities under operating leases with terms longer than 12 months, are as follows at June 30, 2020:



		(in thousands)
Twelve months ended June 30,
2020	$	520
2021		524
2022		529
2023		539
2024		525
Thereafter		18,621
Total undiscounted lease payments	$	21,258
Amounts representing interest		(13,168)
Lease liability	$	8,090

9.REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The ~~methods~~Company’s revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of Topic 606 is recognized within noninterest income. The consolidated statements of income include all categories of noninterest income. There are no significant individual items included in other non-interest income within the scope of Topic 606. The following table reflects only the categories of noninterest income that are within the scope of Topic 606:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	6/30/2020		6/30/2019		6/30/2020		6/30/2019
Service charges	$	990	$	1,397	$	2,279	$	2,591
Trust department income		332		347		702		675
Brokerage income		95		135		222		271
Debit card interchange income		915		903		1,727		1,693
Total	$	2,332	$	2,782	$	4,930	$	5,230

Trust department income: We earn wealth management fees based upon asset custody, investment management, trust, and ~~assumptions,~~estate services provided to customers. Most of these customers receive monthly billings for services rendered based upon the market value of assets and/or income generated. Fees that are transaction based are recognized at the point in time that the transaction is executed

Service charges: We earn fees from our deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees and overdraft fees are recognized at a point in time, since the customer generally has a right to cancel the depository arrangement at any time. The arrangement is considered a day-to-day contract with ongoing renewals and optional purchases, so the duration of the contract does not ~~previously presented, used~~extend beyond the services already performed. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to ~~estimate fair values~~monthly maintenance, are ~~described as follows:~~earned over the course of a month representing the period over which we satisfy our performance obligation.

~~Cash~~Debit card interchange income: As with the transaction-based fees on deposit accounts, debit card interchange income is recognized at the point in time that we fulfill the customer’s request. We earn interchange fees from cardholder transactions processed through card association networks. Interchange rates are generally set by the card associations based upon purchase volumes and ~~Cash Equivalents -~~ ~~The carrying amounts~~other factors. Interchange fees represent a percentage of ~~cash and cash equivalents approximate fair values~~the underlying transaction value and are ~~classified~~recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder

Brokerage income: Brokerage income fees are the commissions and fees received from a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser that provide those services to our customers. We act as ~~Level 1.~~an agent in arranging the relationship between the customer and the third-party service provider. These fees are recognized monthly from the third-party broker based upon services already performed.

Table of Contents

10. DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

As part of our overall interest rate risk management, the Company uses derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps. The notional amount does not represent amounts exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged is determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the individual agreements.

Cash Flow Hedges:Interest ~~Bearing Deposits -~~ ~~The carrying~~rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $23 million and $10 million as of ~~interest bearing deposits approximate fair values~~June 30, 2020 and ~~are classified~~December 31, 2019, were designated as ~~Level 1.~~

~~FHLB Stock -~~ ~~It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.~~

~~Loans -~~ Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for sale, are estimated as follows: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values resulting in a Level 3 classification. Fair values for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow ~~analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers~~hedges of similar credit quality resulting in a Level 3 classification. Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value as described previously. The methods used to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.

~~The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is estimated based upon binding contracts and quotes from third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.~~

~~Deposits -~~ ~~The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and~~ certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amount) resulting in a Level 1 classification. The carrying amounts of variable rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date resulting in a Level 1 classification. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flows calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.

~~Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings -~~ ~~The carrying amounts of borrowings under repurchase agreements approximate their fair values resulting in a Level 2 classification.~~

~~The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values resulting in a Level 2 classification.~~

~~Federal Funds Purchased~~ ~~- The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased approximate fair values and are classified as Level 1.~~

~~FHLB Advances, Borrowings and Subordinated Debentures -~~ ~~The fair values of the Company’s~~rolling three month term FHLB advances and ~~other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on~~were determined to be effective during all periods presented. The Company expects the ~~current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 2 classification.~~

The fair values of the Company’s Subordinated Debentures are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements resulting in a Level 3 classification.

~~Accrued Interest Receivable/Payable -~~ ~~The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value resulting in a Level 2 or Level 3 classification based on the level of the related asset/liability.~~

~~Off-balance Sheet Instruments -~~ ~~Fair values for off-balance sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged~~hedges to ~~enter into similar agreements, taking into account~~remain effective during the remaining terms of the ~~agreements~~swaps. The carrying value of the cash flow hedge was a liability of $2.1 million as of June 30, 2020 and an asset of $46 thousand as of December 31, 2019.

Fair Value Hedges: Interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $7 million and $7 million as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were designated as fair value last of layer hedges of certain fixed rate prepayable loans with an outstanding balance of $56.4 million as of June 30, 2020. The hedges were determined to be effective during all periods presented. The Company expects the ~~counterparties’ credit standing.~~hedges to remain effective during the remaining terms of the swaps. The carrying value of the fair value hedge asset was $742 thousand and $169 thousand as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and included in loans on the Company’s balance sheet. The carrying value of the fair value hedge liability was $724 thousand and $164 thousand as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and was included in other liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges: Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market commitments for the future delivery of these mortgage loans are accounted for as free standing derivatives. The fair value of ~~off-balance sheet instruments~~the interest rate lock is ~~not material.~~

~~Table~~recorded at the time the commitment to fund the mortgage loan is executed and is adjusted for the expected exercise of ~~Contents~~

~~10.CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME BY COMPONENT~~

the commitment before the loan is funded. Fair values of these mortgage derivatives are estimated based on changes in mortgage interest rates from the date the interest on the loan is locked. Changes in ~~Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income by Component (unaudited)~~the fair values of these derivatives are included in net gains on the sales of loans. The carrying value of the fair value asset related to the mortgage banking derivatives was $473 thousand and $48 thousand as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and was included in other assets on the Company’s balance sheet. The notional amounts of these transactions as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were $25.3 million and $7.4 million.

~~(in thousands)~~

Unrealized

Gains and Losses on

Available for Sale

Securities

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

Beginning Balance

$
(956)

$
359

Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period, net of tax

1,889

3,452

Reclassification adjustment for:

Securities gains realized in income

103

317

Income taxes

(35)

(108)

68

209

Net current period other comprehensive income

1,821

3,243

Ending balance

$
865

$
3,602

Unrealized

Gains and Losses on

Available for Sale

Securities

For the Three Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

Beginning Balance

$
1,213

$
4,402

Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period, net of tax

(308)

(774)

Reclassification adjustment for:

Securities gains realized in income, net

60

40

Income taxes

(20)

(14)

40

26

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)

(348)

(800)

Ending balance

$
865

$
3,602

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following is significant amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016:~~

~~September 30, 2017~~

Details about

Amount

Affected Line Item

Accumulated Other

Reclassified From

in the Statement

Comprehensive

Accumulated Other

Where Net

Income Components

Comprehensive Income

Income is Presented

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

$
103

Gain on sale of available for sale securities, net

35

Income taxes

68

Net income

~~September 30, 2016~~

Details about

Amount

Affected Line Item

Accumulated Other

Reclassified From

in the Statement

Comprehensive

Accumulated Other

Where Net

Income Components

Comprehensive Income

Income is Presented

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

$
317

Gain on sale of available for sale securities, net

108

Income taxes

209

Net income

Item 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion provides information about the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of the dates and periods indicated. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the federal securities laws. These statements are not historical facts, but rather statements based on our current expectations regarding our business strategies and their intended results and our future performance. Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “future”, “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “potential,” “may,” and similar expressions.

Forward looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based on only our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included herein will prove to be accurate.

Table of Contents

Factors that could cause actual results to differ from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic conditions (both generally and more specifically in the markets ~~including the tobacco market and the thoroughbred horse industry,~~ in which we ~~and our Bank~~ operate); negative impacts of current COVID-19 pandemic, current or future volatility in market conditions; competition for our subsidiary’s customers from other providers of financial and mortgage services; government legislation, regulation and monetary policy (which changes from time to time and over which we have no control); changes in interest rates (both generally and more specifically mortgage interest rates); ability to successfully gain regulatory approval when required; material unforeseen changes in the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of our subsidiary’s customers; adequacy of the allowance for losses on loans and the level of future provisions

~~Table of Contents~~

for losses on loans; future acquisitions, changes in technology, information security breaches or cyber security attacks involving the Company, itits subsidiaries, or third-party service providers; and other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.

As a result of the uncertainties and the assumptions on which this discussion and the forward-looking statements are based, actual future operations and results in the future may differ materially from those indicated herein.

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Our forward-looking statements are made as of the date of the report, and we undertake no obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

~~Summary~~Policy and Regulatory Developments. Federal, state and local governments and regulatory authorities have enacted and issued a range of policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The descriptions below summarize certain significant government actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, these descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions or government programs.

●

The Federal Reserve decreased the range for the federal funds target rate by 50 basis points on March 3, 2020, and by another 100 basis points on March 16, 2020, reaching a current range of 0.0% - 0.25 %.

●

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), which has subsequently been amended several times. Among other provisions, the CARES Act established an economic stimulus package, including cash payments to individuals, supplemental unemployment insurance benefits and a loan program administered through the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), referred to as the paycheck protection program (PPP). A second round of funding was authorized during the second quarter. In addition, the CARES Act provides financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under GAAP related to TDRs for a limited period of time to account for the effects of COVID-19.

●

On April 7, 2020, federal banking regulators issued a revised Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions, which, among other things, encouraged financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the effects of COVID-19, and stated that institutions generally do not need to categorize COVID-19-related modifications as TDRs and that the agencies will not direct supervised institutions to automatically categorize all COVID-19 related loan modifications as TDRs.

●

The Federal Reserve has announced additional measures aimed at supporting small and mid-sized businesses, as well as state and local governments impacted by COVID-19. The Federal Reserve announced the Main Street Business Lending Program, which establishes two new loan facilities intended to facilitate lending to small and mid-sized businesses: (1) the Main Street New Loan Facility, or MSNLF, and (2) the Main Street Expanded Loan Facility, or MSELF. In addition, the Federal Reserve created a Municipal Liquidity Facility to support state and local governments with up to $500 billion in lending, with the Treasury Department backing $35 billion for the facility using funds appropriated by the CARES Act. The Federal Reserve expanded both the size and scope its Primary and Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facilities to support up to $750 billion in credit to corporate debt issuers. Finally, the Federal Reserve announced that its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility will be scaled up in scope to include the triple A-rated tranche of commercial mortgage-backed securities and newly issued collateralized loan obligations. The size of the facility is $100 billion.

Table of Contents

Effects on Our Business. We currently expect that the COVID-19 pandemic and the specific developments referred to above could have a significant impact on our business. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in temporary closures or

partial-closures of many businesses and the institution of social distancing and shelter in place requirements, which has

increased unemployment levels and caused extreme volatility in the financial markets. In particular, we anticipate that a significant portion of the Bank’s borrowers in various segments will continue to endure significant economic distress, which has caused, and may continue to cause, them to draw on their existing lines of credit and adversely affect their ability to repay existing indebtedness, and is expected to adversely impact the value of collateral.

These developments, together with economic conditions generally, are also expected to impact our commercial real estate portfolio, particularly with respect to real estate with exposure to these industries, and the value of certain collateral securing our loans. As a result, we anticipate that our financial condition, capital levels and results of operations could be adversely affected, as described in further detail below.

Our Response. We have taken numerous steps in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the following:

●

We are actively working with loan customers to evaluate prudent loan modification terms, where necessary.

●

We continue to promote our digital banking options through our website. Customers are encouraged to utilize online and mobile banking tools, and our customer service and retail departments are fully staffed and available to assist customers remotely.

●

We are a participating lender in the PPP. We believe it is our responsibility as a community bank to assist the SBA in the distribution of funds authorized under the CARES Act to our customers and communities, which we are carrying out in a prudent and responsible manner. As of June 30, 2020, we had $56.8 million for PPP loans included in gross loans on our balance sheet.

●

We previously limited all branches to drive-up and appointment only services. However, the Bank implemented a phased re-opening of lobby services, and all lobbies are now open during normal business hours. Management has remained committed to taking all steps to ensure the Bank’s employees remain healthy and available to serve our customers.

The Company recorded net income of ~~$8.1~~$4.8 million, or ~~$2.74~~$0.81 basic earnings and diluted earnings per share for the first ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$6.3~~$6.0 million or ~~$2.10~~$1.01 basic earnings and diluted earnings per share for the ~~nine~~six month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The first ~~nine~~six months net earnings reflect ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$1.9~~$1.2 million, or ~~29.5%~~20.2%, compared to the same time period in ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease in net earnings is mostly attributed to an increase of ~~$903~~$76 thousand, or ~~3.8%~~0.4%, in net interest income, an increase of ~~$1.7~~$1.2 million, or ~~18.4%~~19.4%, in non-interest income, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$483 thousand,~~$1.0 million, or ~~1.9%~~5.8%, in non-interest expense, and ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$125 thousand,~~$1.7 million, or ~~16.1%~~372.2%, for the provision for loan losses. The increase in non-interest income is mostly attributed to ~~the~~an increase in gain on sale of a branch building located in Winchester, Kentucky, to a non-banking real estate investor. The sale was solely for the building and not for the loans or deposits associated with the branch. The sale of the building resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1.2 million. Absent the sale of the building, net income would have been up approximately $1.1 million or 16.9%, net of tax, compared to the same period last year. loans.

The earnings for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 were ~~$2.6~~$3.1 million or ~~$0.87~~$0.51 basic and diluted earnings per share compared to ~~$2.4~~$3.2 million or ~~$0.79~~$0.54 basic and diluted earnings per share for the three month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. The earnings for the three month period in ~~2017~~2020 reflect ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~9.6%~~5.1% compared to the same time period in ~~2016.~~2019.

For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and compared to the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2019, service charges ~~increased $24~~decreased

$312 thousand, gain on the sale of loans increased ~~$167 thousand,~~$1.5 million, and debit card interchange income increased ~~$221~~$34 thousand. Salaries and benefits expense increased ~~$73~~$788 thousand, legal and professional fees decreased ~~$552~~$145 thousand, ~~and~~ debit card expenses decreased $96 thousand and loss on limited partnership expenses increased ~~$226~~$38 thousand.

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and compared to the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2019, service charges decreased ~~$120~~$407 thousand, debit card interchange income increased ~~$64~~$12 thousand, and gains on the sale of loans ~~decreased $118 thousand.~~

increased $1.1 million. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and compared to the ~~the~~ three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2019, salaries and benefits expense increased ~~$52 thousand, legal and professional fees decreased $138~~$513 thousand, data processing expense ~~increased $13~~decreased $105 thousand, debit card expense ~~increased $95~~decreased $73 thousand and other expenses ~~decreased $298~~increased $202 thousand.

For the same three month ~~comparision, repossession~~comparison, loss on limited partnership expense increased ~~$25~~$133 thousand and occupancy

expense decreased $46 thousand.

Table of Contents

Return on average assets was ~~1.05%~~0.81% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~0.84%~~1.11% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. Return on average assets was 1.01% for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~0.94%~~1.19% for the three monthsendedJune30,2019.Returnonaverageequitywas8.02%forthesixmonthperiodendedJune30,2020and 10.92% for the six month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. Return on average equity was ~~11.16% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2017 and 8.94% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2016. Return on average equity was 10.33%~~10.27% for the three month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~9.83%~~11.44% for the three month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~ 2019.

Securities available for sale ~~increased $16.2~~decreased $13.7 million from ~~$273.8~~$265.3 million at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~$290.0~~$251.6 million at ~~September~~June 30, 2017. Trading assets increased by $122 thousand, or 2.20%, and totaled $5.7 million at September 30, 2017 compared to $5.6 million at December 31, 2016, and includes income on the investment totaling $86 thousand during the first nine months of 2017 compared to $117 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Income (loss) on the trading account totaled $27 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $44 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2016.2020.

~~Table of Contents~~

Gross Loans ~~decreased $7.0~~increased $64.2 million from ~~$656.0~~$744.3 million on December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~$649.0~~$808.5 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~ 2020.

The overall ~~decrease~~increase in loan balances from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 is comprised of the following: ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$2.5~~$3.9 million in 1-4 family residential loans, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$2.4~~$45.5 million in commercial loans, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$5.7 million~~$586 thousand in multi-family residential loans, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$3.6 million~~$362 thousand in agricultural loans, an increase of ~~$3.4~~$21.6 million in non-farm and non-residential loans, a decrease of ~~$1.3 million~~$615 thousand in consumer loans and ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$5.1~~$7.1 million in real-estate construction loans. Other loan balances decreased ~~$67~~$109 thousand from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

The increase in commercial loan balances from December 31, 2019 to June 30, 2020 was attributed to having $56.8 million in outstanding “PPP” loan balances as of June 30, 2020. The Company received approximately $1.5 million in origination fees for these loans. These fees will be recognized as interest income on a straight-line basis over a two year period from the time the date of loan origination. These fees may be recognized as income sooner if the loans payoff sooner.

Total deposits ~~decreased~~increased from ~~$803.0~~$842.7 million on December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~$748.0~~$944.6 million on ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, a decrease~~2020, an increase of ~~$55.0~~

$101.9 million. Non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts increased ~~$962 thousand~~$72.9 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 while time deposits $250 thousand and over decreased ~~$5.8~~$7.0 million and other interest bearing deposit accounts ~~decreased $49.8~~increased $36.1 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. The increase in deposits is largely attributed to funds depositors received through various government stimulus programs during the second quarter (i.e., PPP loans, $1,200 stimulus payments to individuals and additional unemployment insurance payments).

Public fund account balances decreased ~~$41.2~~$17.3 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Public fund accounts typically decrease during the first three quarters of the year and increase during the last quarter of the year due to tax payments collected during the fourth quarter and then withdrawn from the Bank during the following months.

Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank increased ~~$9.7~~$29.0 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, repurchase~~2020. Long- term borrowings increased $3.5 million while short-term borrowings increased $25.5 million during the six month period. Repurchase agreements ~~increased $3.2~~decreased $1.7 million ~~and~~for the ~~note payable decreased $328 thousand.~~same six month period.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

Net interest income was ~~$25.0~~$18.1 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$24.1~~$18.0 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2019, an increase of ~~3.8%~~0.1%. Net interest income was ~~$8.4~~$9.1 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$8.1~~$9.1 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, an increase of 4.4%.~~2019.

The tax equivalent net interest ~~spread,~~margin was 3.36% for the first six months of 2020 compared to 3.58% for the first six months of 2019. For the first six months in 2020, the tax equivalent yield on interest earning assets decreased from 4.47% in 2019 to 4.08% in 2020.

Table of Contents

The yield on loans, excluding tax equivalent adjustments, ~~was 3.33%~~decreased fourty two basis points for the ~~first nine~~six months of 2017 compared to 3.37% for the first nine months of 2016. For the first nine months in 2017, the yield on assets increased from 3.86% in 2016 to 3.87% in 2017, excluding tax equivalent adjustments. The yield on loans decreased three basis pointsended June 30, 2020 compared to the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2019 from ~~4.74%~~5.20% to ~~4.71% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~4.78%. The yield on securities, excluding tax equivalent adjustments, ~~increased from 2.30%~~decreased twenty two basis points during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016~~2020 compared to ~~2.35% during the first nine months of 2017.~~2019 from 2.73% in 2019 to 2.51% in 2020. The cost of interest bearing liabilities was ~~0.53%~~1.01% for the first ~~nine~~six months in ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~0.49%~~1.24% in ~~2016.~~ 2019.

Year to date average loans, excluding overdrafts, increased ~~$8.9~~$94.8 million, or ~~1.4%~~13.7% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. Loan interest income increased ~~$553~~$769 thousand during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 compared to the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016.~~2019. Year to date average total deposits increased from ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 by ~~$36.3~~$51.4 million or ~~4.7%~~6.0%. Year to date average interest bearing deposits increased ~~$38.7~~$22.6 million, or ~~7.0%~~3.7%, from ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Deposit interest expense ~~increased $330~~decreased $521 thousand for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2018. Year to date average borrowings, including repurchase agreements, ~~increased $1.4~~decreased $1.2 million, or ~~1.1%~~1.0%, from ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2018 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Interest expense on borrowed funds, including repurchase agreements, ~~increased $57~~decreased $81 thousand, or 5.8%, for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 compared to the same period in ~~2016. Year to date average federal funds purchased increased $864 thousand.~~ 2019.

The volume rate analysis for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 indicates that ~~$313 thousand~~$4.1 million of the increase in loan interest income is attributable to an increase in loan volume and ~~$611~~$680 thousand of the ~~increase~~decrease in securities interest income is attributable to ~~an increase~~a decrease in the volume of our security portfolio. ~~Further, an increase~~Much of the decrease in loan income is attributed to variable rate loans repricing at lower rates. The decrease in loan rates caused ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$240 thousand~~$3.3 million in interest income and a decrease in rates in our security portfolio contributed to a decrease of ~~$10~~$308 thousand in securities interest income. The net effect to interest income was ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$1.3 million~~$526 thousand for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 compared to the same time period in ~~2016.~~2019.

~~Table of Contents~~

Also based on the following volume rate analysis for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, an increase~~2020, a decrease in demand deposit interest rates resulted in ~~$196~~$701 thousand ~~additional~~reduced interest expense, ~~a decrease in~~ interest rates paid for savings deposits remained fairly flat, and decreases in interest rates paid for time deposits resulted in a reduction of ~~$4 thousand in interest expense, and increases in interest rates for time deposits resulted in an increase of $94~~$70 thousand in interest expense. ~~Further, an increase in rates for repurchase agreements and other borrowings resulted in $47 thousand additional expense.~~

The change in volume in deposits and borrowings was responsible for a ~~$52~~$777 thousand increase in interest expense, of which a decrease in demand deposits resulted in a decrease of $84 thousand in interest expense, of which an increase in ~~demand~~time deposits resulted in an increase of ~~$69 thousand in interest expense, a decrease in time deposits resulted in a decrease of $25~~$339 thousand in interest expense, a decrease in repurchase agreements ~~and other borrwings~~ resulted in a decrease of ~~$37~~$60 thousand in interest expense, and ~~a decrease~~an increase in other borrowings resulted in ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$45~~$582 thousand in interest expense. The net effect to interest expense was ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$386~~$602 thousand. As a result, the increase in net interest income for the first ~~nine~~six months in ~~2017~~2020 is mostly attributed to ~~growth in the Company’s~~decreasing rates paid on deposits along with loan ~~and security portfolios.~~growth.

The volume rate analysis for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 indicates that ~~$166~~the $23 thousand ~~of the~~ increase in net interest income is attributable to an increase of $1.1 million due to change in growth in the Company’s balance sheet and ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$192 thousand~~$1.1 million is a result of changes in rates.

Table of Contents

Changes in Interest Income and Expense


	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2017 vs. 2016
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in

							Six Months Ended
							2020 vs. 2019
							Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
(in thousands)	Volume		Rate		Net Change		Volume		Rate		Net Change
INTEREST INCOME
Loans	$	313	$	240	$	553	$	4,078	$	(3,309)	$	769
Investment Securities		611		(10)		601		(680)		(308)		(988)
Other		14		121		135		516		(823)		(307)
Total Interest Income		938		351		1,289		3,914		(4,440)		(526)
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits
Demand		69		196		265		(84)		(701)		(785)
Savings		—		(4)		(4)		—		(5)		(5)
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposits		(25)		94		69		339		(70)		269
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings		(37)		47		10		(60)		(74)		(134)
Federal Home Loan
Bank advances		45		1		46
Federal Home Loan Bank advances								582		(529)		53
Total Interest Expense		52		334		386		777		(1,379)		(602)
Net Interest Income	$	886	$	17	$	903	$	3,137	$	(3,061)	$	76

							Three Months Ended
							2020 vs. 2019
							Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
							Volume		Rate		Net Change
INTEREST INCOME
Loans							$	1,651	$	(1,462)	$	189
Investment Securities								(423)		(50)		(473)
Other								370		(568)		(198)
Total Interest Income								1,598		(2,080)		(482)
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits
Demand								(29)		(458)		(487)
Savings								—		(3)		(3)
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposits								190		(152)		38
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings								(17)		(50)		(67)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances								368		(354)		14
Total Interest Expense								512		(1,017)		(505)
Net Interest Income							$	1,086	$	(1,063)	$	23

~~Table of Contents~~

Three Months Ended September 30

2017 vs. 2016

Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in


Volume

Rate

Net Change

INTEREST INCOME

Loans

$
(50)

$
199

$
149

Investment Securities

290

43

333

Other

(19)

50

31

Total Interest Income

221

292

513

INTEREST EXPENSE

Deposits

Demand

12

80

92

Savings

—

(1)

(1)

Negotiable Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposits

(11)

33

22

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings

26

(22)

4

Federal Home Loan

Bank advances

28

10

38

Total Interest Expense

55

100

155

Net Interest Income

$
166

$
192

$
358

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income increased ~~$1.7~~$1.2 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2019, to ~~$10.8~~$7.6 million. Non-interest income increased ~~$79~~$664 thousand for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, compared to the ~~thee~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30 ~~2016,~~2019, to ~~$3.2~~$4.0 million.

~~As previously noted, non-interest income increased $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 in comparison to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~ Favorable variances to non-interest income for the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2020 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 include an increase of ~~$24 thousand in service charges, an increase of $211 thousand in loan net service fee income, an increase of $83~~$27 thousand in trust department income, an increase of ~~$221 thousand in debit card interchange income, and an increase of $167 thousand in gains on the sale of loans.~~

The largest favorable variance to non-interest income for the first nine months of 2017 is an increase of $1.2 million in gains on bank premises due to the sale of a bank building located in Winchester, Kentucky. The sale was solely for the building and not for the loans or deposits associated with the branch.

~~Decreases to non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 include a decrease of $214~~$230 thousand in gains on the sale of securities, an increase of $34 thousand in debit card interchange income, an increase of $1.5 million in gains on the sale of loans, and an increase of $153 thousand in other income, which is primarily attributed to gains on bank owned life insurance.

Decreases to non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 include a decrease of ~~$13~~$312 thousand in ~~brokerage~~service charge income, a $391 thousand decrease in loan servicing fees, and a decrease of ~~$12~~$49 thousand in ~~gains on trading assets.~~ brokerage income.

Table of Contents

The gain on the sale of loans increased from ~~$1.3~~$528 thousand during the first six months of 2019 to $2.1 million during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016 to $1.5 million during the first nine months of 2017,~~2020, an increase of ~~$167 thousand.~~$1.5 million. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, the gain on the sale of loans ~~decreased~~increased from ~~$533~~$321 thousand in ~~2016~~2019 to ~~$415 thousand~~$1.4 million in ~~2017.~~2020.

The volume of loans originated to sell during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 increased ~~$3.2~~$37.7 million compared to the same time period in ~~2016. The volume of loans originated to sell the during the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased $5.8 million.~~2019. The volume of mortgage loan originations and sales is generally inverse to rate changes. A change in the mortgage loan rate environment can have a significant impact on the related gain on sale of mortgage loans. Loan service fee income, net of amortization and impairment expense, was ~~$234~~$(287) thousand for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$23~~$104 thousand for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, an increase~~2019, a decrease of ~~$211~~$391 thousand. During the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017,~~2020, the market value adjustment to the carrying value of the mortgage servicing right was a net ~~recovery~~write- down of ~~prior-writedowns of $40~~$336 thousand, as the fair value of this asset ~~increased.~~decreased. During the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2016,~~ended June 30 2019, the market value adjustment to the carrying value of the mortgage servicing right asset was a net write-down of ~~$106 thousand as the fair value of the mortgage servicing asset decreased.~~ $41 thousand.

~~Table of Contents~~

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, the market value adjustment to the carrying value of the mortgage serving right asset was a net recovery of prior write-downs of $6 thousand compared to a net write-down of $64 thousand during the third quarter of 2016.

Non-Interest Expense

Total non-interest expense ~~decreased $476 thousand~~increased $1.0 million, or 5.8%, for the ~~nine~~six month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2019. Total non-interest expense ~~decreased $275~~increased $560 thousand for the three month period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~ 2019.

Management continues to consider opportunities for branch expansion and will also consider acquisition opportunities that help advance its strategic objectives, which would result in additional future non-interest expense. Our most recent expansion involved constructing a new branch in Lexington, KY in Tates Creek Centre. The branch opened in July 2020.

For the comparable ~~nine~~six month periods, salaries and employees benefits expense increased ~~$73~~$788 thousand, an increase of ~~0.5%~~8.4%. The number of full-time employee equivalent employees ~~decreased~~increased from ~~247~~232 at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2019 to 236 at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, a decrease~~2020, an increase of 11four full-time employee equivalent employees. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2019, salaries and employee benefits expense ~~decreased $52~~increased $513 thousand, or ~~1.1%~~11.0%.

Occupancy expense increased ~~$53~~$67 thousand to ~~$2.9~~$2.1 million for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 compared to the same time period in ~~2016. Building rent~~2019. Occupancy expense was $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Debit card expenses decreased $96 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the first six months of 2019 and decreased $73 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019. The year to date decrease in debit card expense is attributed to a decrease in debit card interchange activity.

Data processing expenses decreased $127 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the first six months of 2019 and decreased $105 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Loss on limited partnership expense increased ~~$76~~$267 thousand ~~mostly due to rent expense being lower in 2016 due to~~for the ~~Company recovering $20 thousand in accrued expense for a former branch leased in Richmond, KY. In addition, the Company incurred an additional $42 thousand in building rents during the first nine~~six months ~~of 2017,~~ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same time period in ~~2016, due to rent expense associated with leasing back the branch building that was sold in Winchester, KY during the first quarter of 2017.~~2019. The ~~Company is leasing back the formerly owned building until a new building is contructed which is expected to be completed in 2018.~~

Depreciation expense decreased $107 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to September 30, 2016. Expenses incurred for assets not depreciated increased $121 thousand during the first nine months of 2017 compared to the first nine months of 2016. This increase is attributed to ~~purchasing additional equipment during~~accelerating the ~~first quarter~~amortization of ~~2017 and increasing the threshold for which we depreciate assets. The capitalization policy, during the first nine months~~one of ~~2016, stated assets purchased with a cost of $1,000 or greater would be capitalized and depreciated. This policy~~our tax credit investments. However, this was ~~changed during the last half of 2016 and now states the minimum threshold for an asset to be capitalized is $2,500.~~offset through reduced income tax expense.

~~Occupancy expense was $935 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $974 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2016, a decrease of $39 thousand.~~

Legal and professional fees decreased $505 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the first nine months in 2016 and decreased $91 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The reduction in legal and professional fees is mostly attributed to expenses being higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to the Company incurring $625 thousand for expenses related to acquiring the services of an outside firm to help the Company identify ways to become more efficient and profitable. Similar expenses totaled $198 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, a decrease of $427 thousand.

Debit card expenses increased $226 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the first nine months of 2016 and increased $95 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in debit card expense is attributed to an increase in debit card interchange activity which also resulted in increases in debit card interchange income as shown on the income statement. Debit card expenses have also increased during 2017 due to issuing new debit cards.

Repossession expense increased $67 thousand for the first nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same time period in 2016 and increased $25 thousand for the three month period ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. Repossession expenses are reported net of rental income earned on repossessed properties. Net repossession expenses were higher during the first nine months of 2017 when compared to 2016 due to net write-downs totaling $141 in 2017 compared to net write-downs of $131 thousand in 2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 was ~~19.1%~~2.4% compared to ~~8.5%~~4.61% in 2016. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 18.0% compared to 0.3% in 2016. The effective tax rate is higher in 2017 due to an increase in taxable income, largely due to the $1.2 million gain on the sale of the branch building.2019. These effective tax rates are less than the statutory rate of 21% as a result of the Company investing in tax-free securities, loans and other investments which generate tax credits for the Company.

The Company also has a captive insurance subsidiary which contributes to reducing taxable income. ~~Income~~

The effective tax ~~expense increased $1.3 million~~rate was lower for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2019 due to tax credits associated with low income housing investments increasing from $276 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2019 to $607 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2020; an increase of $331 thousand.

Table of Contents

Tax- exempt income increased $207 thousand for the first six months of 2020 compared to the first ~~nine~~six months ~~in 2016. Tax-exempt interest~~of 2019. Further, income ~~decreased $166 thousand~~before income taxes for the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2020 decreased $1.4 million when compared to the ~~first nine~~six months of 2016. Further, for the first nine months of 2017, the Company had tax credits totaling $416 thousand for investments made in low income housing projects compared to similar tax credits of $836 thousand for the first nine months of 2016.ended June 30, 2019.

As part of normal business, the Bank typically makes tax free loans to select municipalities in our market and invests in selected tax free securities, primarily in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. In making these investments, the Company considers the overall impact to managing our net interest margin, credit worthiness of the underlying issuer and the favorable impact on our tax position. For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the Company averaged ~~$92~~$25.9 million in tax free securities and ~~$40~~$56.5 million in tax free loans. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the weighted average remaining maturity for ~~the~~ tax free securities is ~~112~~61 months, while the weighted average remaining maturity for the tax free loans is ~~138~~ 167 months.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company averaged $36.3 million in tax free securities, and $42.8 million in tax free loans. As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining maturity for the tax free securities was103months,whiletheweightedaverageremainingmaturityforthetaxfreeloanswas131months.

On March 26, 2019, Governor Bevin signed House Bill 354 into law which, among other things, repealed the bank franchise tax structure in Kentucky. The capital based franchise tax structure will be replaced with the state-wide corporate income tax structure starting in 2021. Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. has historically filed a separate return in Kentucky, and has generated a Kentucky net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward, given the nature of its operations. Given House Bill 354, Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. will file a combined return in 2021, unless the Company decides to timely elect to file on a consolidated basis.

On April 9, 2019, Governor Bevin signed House Bill 458 into law which, among other things, allows a taxpayer to utilize certain net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards to offset other members in the combined filing group starting in 2021.

As a result of these tax law changes, the Company had a deferred state tax asset of $514 thousand as of June 30, 2020 and $606 thousand as of December 31, 2019.

Liquidity and Funding

Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations. The Company’s primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of investment securities and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.

Liquidity risk is the possibility that we may not be able to meet our cash requirements in an orderly manner. Management of liquidity risk includes maintenance of adequate cash and sources of cash to fund operations and to meet the needs of borrowers, depositors and creditors. Excess liquidity ~~has~~may have a negative impact on earnings as a result of the lower yields on short-term assets.

Cash and cash equivalents were ~~$18.6~~$104.3 million as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$43.2~~$22.2 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash and cash equivalents is attributed to ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$23.6~~$82.0 million in cash and due from banks and a decrease of $1.0 million in federal funds sold. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents is mostly attributed to deposit balances being greater at December 31 for our public entity depositors due to the recent collection of tax revenues. As the tax dollars are dispursed throughout the year, the balances for these depositors will decrease resulting in a decrease in the Company’s cash and cash equivalents.banks.

In addition to cash and cash equivalents, the securities portfolio provides an important source of liquidity. Securities available for sale totaled ~~$290.0~~$251.6 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$273.8~~$265.3 million at December 31, ~~2016. Securities classified as trading assets totaled $5.7~~2019. The decrease of $13.7 million, ~~at September 30, 2017 compared to $5.6 million at~~from December 31, ~~2016.~~2019 to June 30, 2020 in our available for sale security portfolio had minimal impact on available liquidity. The securities available for sale ~~and trading assets~~ are available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis. However, we expect our customers’ deposits to be adequate to meet our funding demands.

Generally, we rely upon net cash inflows from financing activities, supplemented by net cash inflows from operating activities, to provide cash used in our investing activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering and the use of short-term borrowings, such as federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements along with long-term debt. Our primary investing activities include purchasing investment securities and loan originations.

3945

Table of Contents

For the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017,~~2020, deposits ~~decreased $54.6~~increased $101.9 million compared to December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The Company’s borrowed funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank increased ~~$9.7~~$29.0 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, federal funds purchased ~~increased $17.3 million,~~remained at zero, and total repurchase agreements ~~increased $3.2~~decreased $1.7 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

Management is aware of the challenge of funding sustained loan growth. Therefore, in addition to deposits, other sources of funds, such as Federal Home Loan Bank advances, may be used. We rely on Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and asset/liability management purposes. These advances are used primarily to fund ~~long-term~~long- term fixed rate residential mortgage loans. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, we have sufficient collateral to borrow an additional ~~$69~~$83.9 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

In addition, as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, $30~~2020, $31 million is available in overnight borrowing through various correspondent banks and ~~the Company has access to an additional $289~~$270 million is available in brokered deposits. In light of this, management believes there is sufficient liquidity to meet all reasonable borrower, depositor and creditor needs in the present economic environment. In addition, the Federal Reserve has implemented a liquidity facility available to financial institutions participating in the PPP. As such, the Bank believes it has sufficient liquidity sources to fund all pending PPP loans and to continue to provide this important service to local businesses.

Capital Requirements

In August 2018, the Federal Reserve Board issued an interim final ruling that holding companies with assets less than $3 billion are not subject to minimum capital requirements. As a result, only Bank capital data and capital ratios are presented as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

The ~~Company and the~~ Bank ~~are~~is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the ~~Company and the~~ Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of ~~the Company’s and~~ the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The ~~Company and~~ Bank capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

The final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for US banks (Basel III rules) became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and was fully phased in on January 1, 2019. The net unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities and holding gains or losses on cash flow hedges are not included in computing regulatory capital.

The federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule that provides for an optional, simplified measure of capital adequacy, the community bank leverage ratio framework, for qualifying community banking organizations, consistent with Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. The final rule became effective on January 1, 2020. This final rule is applicable to all non-advanced approaches FDIC-supervised institutions with less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets. Highlights of the Community Bank Leverage Ratio Framework follow:

●

The community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) final rule will be effective on January 1, 2020, and will allow qualifying community banking organizations to calculate a leverage ratio to measure capital adequacy. Banks opting into the CBLR framework (CBLR banks) will not be required to calculate or report risk-based capital.

●

A qualifying community banking organization is defined as having less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, a leverage ratio greater than 9% as of March 31, 2020 and 8% as of June 30, 2020, off-balance sheet exposures of 25% or less of total consolidated assets, and trading assets and liabilities of 5% or less of total consolidated assets. It also cannot be an advanced approaches institution. Under the interim final rules, the community bank leverage ratio will be 8 percent beginning in the second quarter and for the remainder of calendar year 2020, 8.5 percent for calendar year 2021, and 9 percent thereafter.

Table of Contents

The interim final rules also maintain a two-quarter grace period for a qualifying community banking organization whose leverage ratio falls no more than 1 percent below the applicable community bank leverage ratio.

●

The final rule adopts tier 1 capital and the existing leverage ratio into the community bank leverage ratio framework. The tier 1 numerator takes into account the modifications made in relation to the capital simplifications and current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) transitions rules as of the compliance dates of those rules.

●

A CBLR bank will not be subject to other capital and leverage requirements. It will be deemed to have met the "well capitalized" ratio requirements and be in compliance with the generally applicable capital rule.

●

A CBLR may opt out of the framework at any time, without restriction, by reverting to the generally applicable risk-based capital rule.

Management believes as of June 30, 2020, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require ~~the Company and~~ the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) ~~of Total~~ and Tier I capital ~~including Common Equity Tier 1 Capital,~~ (as defined in the ~~applicable banking~~ regulations) ~~to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital~~ to average assets (as defined). ~~Management believes,~~

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as ~~of September~~is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

At June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and at December 31, ~~2016, that~~2019, the ~~Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.~~

~~The~~ most recent ~~notification from the FDIC~~regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum ~~Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, Common Equity Tier 1 risk based and~~ Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.

In July 2013, the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method of calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the rule establishes a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), increases the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets) and assigns a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The final rule also requires unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirement unless a one-time opt-in or opt-out is exercised, which the Company did opt-out of. The rule limits a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

~~Table of Contents~~

The capital conservation buffer was 1.25% at September 30, 2017 and the Company is in compliance with the capital conservation buffer. The final rule became effective for the Bank on January 1, 2016. In accordance with the final rule, the capital conservation buffer requirement began being phased in beginning January 1, 2016 and will continue through January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective. The Company’s and the Bank’s actual amounts and ratios ~~exclusive of the capital conservation buffer,~~ are presented in the ~~table below:~~following table:

To Be Well

Capitalized

Under Prompt

For Capital

Corrective

Actual

Adequacy Purposes

Action Provisions

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

(Dollars in Thousands)

June 30, 2020

Bank Only

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)

105,145

8.6

97,791

8.0

97,791

8.0

December 31, 2019

Bank Only

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)

102,759

9.3

44,164

4.0

55,206

5.0

To Be Well

Capitalized

Under Prompt

For Capital

Corrective

Actual

Adequacy Purposes

Action Provisions


Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

Amount

Ratio

(Dollars in Thousands)

September 30, 2017

Consolidated

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

$
100,029

14.2
%
$
56,479

8.0
%

N/A

N/A

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

92,189

13.1

42,359

6.0

N/A

N/A

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

85,189

12.1

31,770

4.5

N/A

N/A

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)

92,189

9.1

40,607

4.0

N/A

N/A

Bank Only

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

$
98,654

14.7
%
$
53,759

8.0
%
$
67,198

10.0
%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

90,814

13.5

40,319

6.0

53,759

8.0

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

90,814

13.5

30,239

4.5

43,679

6.5

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)

90,814

9.0

40,469

4.0

50,587

5.0

December 31, 2016

Consolidated

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

$
94,343

13.9
%
$
54,280

8.0
%

N/A

N/A

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

86,718

12.8

40,710

6.0

N/A

N/A

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

79,718

11.8

30,533

4.5

N/A

N/A

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)

86,718

8.7

39,795

4.0

N/A

N/A

Bank Only

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

$
95,118

14.0
%
$
54,246

8.0
%
$
67,808

10.0
%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

87,493

12.9

40,685

6.0

54,246

8.0

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)

87,493

12.9

30,513

4.5

44,075

6.5

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)

87,493

8.8

39,671

4.0

49,588

5.0

Table of Contents

Non-Performing Assets

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, our non-performing assets totaled ~~$4.2~~$6.7 million or ~~0.42%~~0.54% of assets compared to ~~$9.4~~$6.7 million or ~~0.91%~~0.61% of assets at December 31, ~~2016 (See table below.)~~2019. The Company experienced ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$3.2~~$1.5 million in non-accrual loans from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, non-accrual loans include ~~$150~~$903 thousand ~~in loans secured by farmland, $1.2 million~~ in loans secured by 1-4 family properties, $374 thousand in loans secured by real estate construction, $2.0 million in loans secured by non-farm and ~~$30~~non-residential properties, $1.3 million in loans secured by multi-family properties and $38 thousand in consumer loans.

Loans secured by real estate composed ~~97.8%~~99.2% of the non-performing, non-accrual loans as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and ~~96.9%~~97.8% as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. Forgone interest income on non-accrual loans totaled ~~$63~~$195 thousand for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 compared to forgone interest of ~~$65~~$41 thousand for the same time period in ~~2016.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

2019. Accruing loans that are contractually 90 days or more past due as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 totaled ~~$151~~$264 thousand compared to ~~$757 thousand~~$1.5 million at December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, a decrease of ~~$606 thousand.~~$1.2 million.

Total nonperforming ~~and restructured~~ loans ~~decreased $6.0 million~~increased $242 thousand from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. The ~~decrease in non-performing loan balances contributed to the decrease in the~~ ratio of nonperforming ~~and restructured~~ loans as a percentage of loans decreased one basis point to ~~loans which decreased 91 basis points to 0.24%~~0.60% from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

In addition, the amount the Company has recorded as other real estate owned ~~increased $845~~decreased $269 thousand from December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the amount recorded as other real estate owned totaled ~~$2.7~~$1.9 million compared to ~~$1.8~~$2.1 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. During the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017, $1.9 million in loan balances~~2020, no new additions were ~~foreclosed upon and~~ added to other real estate properties while ~~$911~~$231 thousand in other real estate properties were sold. Write-downs totaling $38 thousand were also recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2020. The allowance as a percentage of non-performing and restructured loans and other real estate owned increased from ~~80%~~126% at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 to ~~184%~~155% at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

The economic downturn experienced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to result in increased non-performing assets. Loan modifications executed during 2020 totaled approximately $115 million. The majority of these modifications involved three to six month forbearance payments which were added to the end of the note. These modification and economic stimulus packages offered by the government are expected to help loan customers meet debt obligations but it is unknown to what extent at this time.

Nonperforming and Restructured Assets


							6/30/2020			12/31/2019

	9/30/2017			12/31/2016
	(in thousands)
							(in thousands)
Non-accrual Loans	$	1,393		$	4,566		$	4,558		$	3,081
Accruing Loans which are Contractually past due 90 days or more		151			927
Accruing Loans which are Contractually past due over 89 days								264			1,499
Accruing Troubled Debt Restructurings		—			2,063			—			—
Total Nonperforming and Restructured Loans		1,544			7,556			4,822			4,580
Other Real Estate		2,669			1,824			1,879			2,148
Total Nonperforming and Restructured Loans and Other Real Estate	$	4,213		$	9,380		$	6,701		$	6,728
Nonperforming and Restructured Loans as a Percentage of Loans		0.24	%		1.15	%		0.60	%		0.61	%
Nonperforming and Restructured Loans and Other Real Estate as a Percentage of Total Assets		0.42	%		0.91	%		0.54	%		0.61	%
Allowance as a Percentage of Period-end Loans		1.19	%		1.15	%		1.29	%		1.14	%
Allowance as a Percentage of Non-performing and Restructured Loans and Other Real Estate		184	%		80	%		155	%		126	%

We maintain a “watch list” of agricultural, commercial, real estate mortgage, and real estate construction loans and review those loans at least quarterly but more often if needed. Generally, assets are designated as “watch list” loans to ensure more frequent monitoring. If we determine that there is serious doubt as to performance in accordance with original terms of the contract, then the loan is generally downgraded and often placed on non-accrual status.

We review and evaluate nonaccrual loans, past due loans, and loans graded substandard or worse on a regular basis to determine if the loan should be evaluated for impairment and whether specific allocations are needed.

Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses

The loan loss provision for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 was ~~$650 thousand~~$2.1 million compared to ~~$775~~$450 thousand for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~loan loss provision for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $100 thousand compared to $175 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease~~increase in the total loan loss provision during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2017~~2020 compared to the same time period in ~~2016~~2019 was attributed mostly to uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. It is ~~mostly attributed to improved~~possible the Company will have additional provision for loan ~~credit quality.~~losses expense in future quarters as a result of the economic downturn associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we recorded a specific reserve of $900 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2020 for one loan which had an an outstanding balance $1.8 million, not accruing interest and classified as non-farm and non-residential at June 30, 2020. The ~~allowace~~specific reserve of $900 thousand was offset by declines in loan balances in other segments only requiring $500 thousand provision expense for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans was ~~1.19%~~1.29% at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~1.15%~~1.14% at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~ 2019. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans, excluding PPP loans for which no allowance for loan losses was needed as of June 30, 2020, was 1.38%.

Management evaluates the loan portfolio by reviewing the historical loss rate for each respective loan type and assigns risk multiples to certain categories to account for qualitative factors including current economic conditions. The average loss rates are reviewed for trends in the analysis, as well as comparisons to peer group loss rates.

Management makes allocations within the allowance for loan losses for specifically classified loans regardless of loan amount, collateral or loan type. Loan categories are evaluated utilizing subjective factors in addition to the historical loss calculations to determine a loss allocation for each of those types.

~~Table of Contents~~

As this analysis, or any similar analysis, is an imprecise measure of loss, the allowance is subject to ongoing adjustments. Therefore, management will often take into account other significant factors that may be necessary or prudent in order to reflect probable incurred losses in the total loanportfolio.

Nonperforming loans increased $242 thousand from December 31, 2019 to $4.8 million at June 30, 2020. The Company recorded net charge-offs of ~~$436~~$196 thousand for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to net ~~recoveries~~charge-offs of ~~$109~~$501 thousand for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2019. During the first quarter of ~~2016, the Company recorded~~2019, a ~~recovery~~single note balance of ~~$259~~$191 thousand ~~for one~~was charged-off. The note had a specific reserve of $191 thousand at December 31, 2018; thus, this charged-off balance did not result in additional loan ~~which was charged-off in a prior year.~~loss provision expense. Future levels of charge-offs will be determined by the particular facts and circumstances surrounding individual loans.

Based on the above information, management believes the current loan loss allowance is sufficient to meet probable incurred loan losses.

~~Loan Losses~~

Nine Months Ended September 30,

(in thousands)



2017


2016

Balance at Beginning of Period

$
7,541

$
6,521

Amounts Charged-Off:

Commercial

35

—

1-4 family residential

203

90

Multi-family residential

—

—

Non-farm & non-residential

78

—

Agricultural

—

3

Consumer and other

810

915

Total Charged-off Loans

1,126

1,008

Recoveries on Amounts Previously Charged-off:

    Commercial

17

37

Real Estate Construction

1

15

1-4 family residential

8

8

Multi-family residential

10

7

Non-farm & non-residential

—

355

Agricultural

47

35

Consumer and other

607

660

Total Recoveries

690

1,117

Net Charge-offs (Recoveries)

436

(109)

Provision for Loan Losses

650

775

Balance at End of Period

7,755

7,405

Loans

Average

652,387

642,998

At September 30,

648,965

659,970

As a Percentage of Average Loans:

Net Charge-offs for the period

0.07
%

(0.02)
%
Provision for Loan Losses for the period

0.10
%

0.12
%
Allowance as a Multiple of Net Charge-offs annualized

13.3

(51.0)

4349

Table of Contents


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	(in thousands)
		2020			2019
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	8,460		$	8,127
Amounts Charged-Off:
Commercial		25			191
1-4 family residential		35			104
Non-farm & non-residential		—			17
Consumer and other		613			580
Total Charged-off Loans		673			892
Recoveries on Amounts Previously Charged-off:
Commercial		12			10
1-4 family residential		18			12
Agricultural		3			4
Consumer and other		444			365
Total Recoveries		477			391
Net Charge-offs (Recoveries)		196			501
Provision for Loan Losses		2,125			450
Balance at End of Period		10,389			8,076
Loans
Average		786,236			691,399
At June 30,		808,467			707,982
As a Percentage of Average Loans:
Net Charge-offs for the period		0.02	%		0.07	%
Provision for Loan Losses for the period		0.27	%		0.07	%
Allowance as a Multiple of Net Charge-offs annualized		26.5			8.1


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	(in thousands)
	2020			2019
Balance at Beginning of Period:	$	9,916		$	7,882
Amounts Charged-Off:
1-4 family residential		—			5
Consumer and other		266			278
Total Charged-off Loans		266			283
Recoveries on Amounts Previously Charged-off:
Commercial		6			3
1-4 family residential		3			4
Agricultural		1			3
Consumer and other		229			142
Total Recoveries		239			152
Net Charge-offs		27			131
Provision for Loan Losses		500			325
Balance at End of Period		10,389			8,076
Loans
Average		810,478			697,381
At June 30,		808,467			707,982
As a Percentage of Average Loans:
Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) for the period		0.00	%		0.02	%
Provision for Loan Losses for the period		0.06	%		0.05	%
Allowance as a Multiple of Net Charge-offs annualized		96.2			15.4

Three Months Ended September 30,

(in thousands)


2017

2016

Balance at Beginning of Period:

$
7,958

$
7,259

Amounts Charged-Off:

Commercial

20

—

1-4 family residential

170

26

Non-farm & non-residential

78

—

Agricultural

—

3

Consumer and other

240

253

Total Charged-off Loans

508

282

Recoveries on Amounts Previously Charged-off:

    Commercial

2

3

Real Estate Construction

0

2

1-4 family residential

3

1

Multi-family residential

3

3

Non-farm & non-residential

0

82

Agricultural

19

12

Consumer and other

178

150

Total Recoveries

205

253

Net Charge-offs

303

29

Provision for Loan Losses

100

175

Balance at End of Period

7,755

7,405

Loans

Average

647,103

657,336

At September 30,

648,965

659,970

As a Percentage of Average Loans:

Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) for the period

0.05
%

0.00
%
Provision for Loan Losses for the period

0.02
%

0.03
%
Allowance as a Multiple of Net Charge-offs annualized

6.4

63.8

Table of Contents

~~Item 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~

Asset/Liability management control is designed to ensure safety and soundness, maintain liquidity and regulatory capital standards, and achieve acceptable net interest income. Management considers interest rate risk to be the most significant market risk since a bank’s net income is largely dependent on net interest income. Our exposure to market risk is reviewed on a regular basis by the Asset/Liability Committee. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes.

These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk, while at the same time, maximize income.

Management realizes certain risks are inherent and that the goal is to identify and minimize the risks. The primary tools used by management are interest rate shock and economic value of equity (EVE) simulations. The Company has $5.7 million in market risk sensitive instruments which are held for trading purposes. These assets are held for a minimal period of time and are used to generate profits on short-term differences in price while earning interest for the time they are held.

Using interest rate shock simulations, the following table depicts the change in net interest income resulting from 100 and 300 basis point changes in rates on the Company’s interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.

The projections are based on balance sheet growth assumptions and repricing opportunities for new, maturing and adjustable rate amounts. As of September 30, 2017, the projected percentage changes are within limits approved by our Board of Directors (“Board”).

Although management does analyze and monitor the projected percentage change in a declining interest rate environment, due to the current rate environment many of the current deposit rates cannot decline an additional 100 basis points. Therefore, management places more emphasis in the rising rate environment scenarios. Similar to prior periods, this period’s volatility is comparable in each rate shock simulation when compared to the same period a year ago. The projected net interest income report summarizing our interest rate sensitivity as of September 30, 2017 is as follows:

~~PROJECTED NET INTEREST INCOME~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Level

Change in basis points:

- 100

Rates

+ 100

+ 300

Year One (10/17 - 9/18)

Net interest income

$
32,881

$
33,724

$
33,658

$
33,547

Net interest income dollar change

(843)

N/A

(66)

(177)

Net interest income percentage change

(2.5)
%

N/A

(0.2)
%

(0.5)
%
Board approved limit

>(4.0)
%

N/A

>(4.0)
%

>(10.0)
%

~~The projected net interest income report summarizing the Company’s interest rate sensitivity as of September 30, 2016 is as follows:~~

~~PROJECTED NET INTEREST INCOME~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Level

Change in basis points:

- 100

Rates

+ 100

+ 300

Year One (10/16-9/17)

Net interest income

$
31,479

$
32,176

$
32,120

$
32,038

Net interest income dollar change

(697)

N/A

(56)

(138)

Net interest income percentage change

(2.2)
%

N/A

(0.2)
%

(0.4)
%
Board approved limit

>(4.0)
%

N/A

>(4.0)
%

>(10.0)
%

Projections from September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, year one reflected declines of 2.5% and 2.2% in net interest income assuming rates were to decline 100 basis points. Assuming an increase in rates of 100 basis points, projections reflected a 0.2% decrease in net interest income for both periods.

~~Table of Contents~~

EVE applies discounting techniques to future cash flows to determine the present value of assets, liabilities, and therefore equity. Based upon applying these techniques to the September 30, 2017, balance sheet, a 100 basis point decrease in rates results in an 11.1% decrease in EVE. A 100 basis point increase in rates results in a 0.4% decrease in EVE. These are within the Board approved limits.

Item 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, and pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

We also conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.

Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

Part II - Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of operations, the Company and the Bank may be involved in various legal proceedings that the Company believes is of such types common to our industry. There is no proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of management, threatened in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the business or consolidated financial position of the Company or the Bank.

Item 1 A. Risk Factors

There are factors, many beyond our control, which may significantly affect the Company’s financial position and results of operations. In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q document, you should consider the

factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our 2019 Form 10-K, as updated in our subsequent quarterly

reports. These risks are not totally independent of each other; some factors affect more than one type of risk. These include regulatory, economic, and competitive environments.

As part of the annual internal audit plan, our risk management department meets with management to assess these risks throughout the Company. Many risks are further addressed in other sections of this Form 10-Q document. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair the Company’s business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.

In the first quarter of 2020, we identified the following additional risk factors:

The outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) has adversely impacted, and an outbreak of other highly infectious or contagious diseases could adversely impact, certain industries in which the Company’s customers operate and could impair their ability to fulfill their obligations to the Company. Further, the spread of the outbreak is expected to lead to an economic recession and other severe disruptions in the U.S. economy and may disrupt banking and other financial activity in the areas in which the Company operates and could potentially create widespread issues for the Company.

The spread of highly infectious or contagious diseases could cause, and the spread of COVID-19 has caused, severe disruptions in the U.S. economy at large, and for small businesses in particular, which could disrupt the Company’s operations. We are starting to see the impact from COVID-19 on our business, and we believe that it could be significant, adverse and potentially material.

Table of Contents

Currently, COVID-19 is spreading through the United States and the world. The resulting concerns on the part of the U.S. and global populations have created the threat of a recession, reduced economic activity and caused a significant correction in the global stock markets. We expect that we could experience significant disruptions across our business due to these effects, possibly leading to decreased earnings, significant slowdowns in our loan collections or increased loan defaults. We also may experience financial losses due to increased cyber and payment fraud risk, as cybercriminals attempt to profit from the disruptions, given increased only and remote activity.

The Company relies upon its third-party vendors to conduct business and to process, record, and monitor transactions. If any of these vendors are unable to continue to provide the Company with these services, it could negatively impact the Company’s ability to serve its customers. Furthermore, the outbreak could negatively impact the ability of the Company’s employees and customers to engage in banking and other financial transactions in the geographic areas in which the Company operates and could create widespread issues for the Company.

The Company also could be adversely affected if key personnel or a significant number of employees were to become unavailable due to the effects and restrictions of a COVID-19 outbreak in our market areas. Although the Company has business continuity plans and other safeguards in place, there is no assurance that such plans and safeguards will be effective. We believe that the economic impact from COVID-19 could have an adverse impact on our business and could result in losses in our loan portfolio, all of which would impact our earnings and capital.

COVID-19 may impact businesses’ and consumers’ desire or financial ability to borrow money, which would negatively impact loan volumes. In addition, certain of our borrowers are in or have exposure to the various industries impacted by COVID-19 and/or are located in areas that are quarantined or under stay-at-home orders, and COVID-19 may also have an adverse effect on our commercial real estate and consumer loan portfolios.

A prolonged quarantine or stay-at-home order would have a negative adverse impact on these borrowers and their revenue streams, which consequently impacts their ability to meet their financial obligations and could result in loan defaults.

The outbreak of COVID-19 or an outbreak of other highly infectious or contagious diseases has resulted in or may result in a decrease in our customers’ businesses, a decrease in consumer confidence and business generally, an increase in unemployment or a disruption in the services provided by the Company’s vendors. Disruptions to our customers could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans, negatively impact regional economic conditions, result in declines in local loan demand, liquidity of loan guarantors, loan collateral (particularly in real estate), loan originations and deposit availability and negatively impact the implementation of our growth strategy.

As a participating lender in the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), the Company and the Bank are subject to additional risks of litigation from the Bank’s customers or other parties regarding the Bank’s processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which has subsequently been amended several times. The CARES Act included a $349 billion loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP. Under the PPP, small businesses and other entities and individuals can apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enroll in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. The Bank is participating as a lender in the PPP. The PPP opened on April 3, 2020; however, because of the short timeframe between the passing of the CARES Act and the opening of the PPP, there is some ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which exposes the Company to risks relating to noncompliance with the PPP. On or about April 16, 2020, the SBA notified lenders that the $349 billion earmarked for the PPP was exhausted. On or about April 23, 2020, Congress approved an $310 billion in new funding for the PPP, including $30 billion that was reserved for lenders with less than $10 billion in assets such as the Company.

Table of Contents

Since the opening of the PPP, several other larger banks have been subject to litigation regarding the process and procedures that such banks used in processing applications for the PPP. The Company and the Bank may be exposed to the risk of similar litigation, from both customers and non-customers that approached the Bank regarding PPP loans, regarding its process and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP. If any such litigation is filed against the Company or the Bank and is not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company or the Bank, it may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect the Company’s reputation. In addition, litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome. Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Bank also has credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Bank, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP.

In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Company, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from the Company.

Even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided, we may continue to experience adverse impacts to our business as a result of the virus’s global economic impact, including the availability of credit, adverse impacts on our liquidity and any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect the spread of COVID-19 as a global pandemic may have, and as a result, the ultimate impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and subject to change.

To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks we face, including the risks described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our 2019 Form 10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We continue to work with our management to assess, address and mitigate the impact of this global pandemic. However, we cannot predict the length and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic at this time.

The risks described in our 2019 Form 10-K are not the only risks that we encounter. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


	(a)			(c) Total Number	(d) Maximum Number
	Total	(b)		of Shares (or Units)	(or Approximate Dollar
	Number of	Average		Purchased as Part	Value) of Shares (or
	Shares (or	Price Paid		of Publicly	Units) that May Yet Be
	Units)	Per Share		Announced Plans	Purchased Under the
Period	Purchased	(or Unit)		Or Programs	Plans or Programs
7/4/1/~~17-7/31/17~~20 - 4/30/20	—	$	—	—	~~100,912~~135,824	shares

5/1/20 - 5/31/20	—		—	—
~~8/1/17-8/31/17~~	—		—	—	~~100,912~~135,824	shares

6/1/20 - 6/30/20	—		—	—
~~9/1/17-9/30/17~~	—		—	—	~~100,912~~135,824	shares

Total	—	$	—	—	~~100,912~~135,824	shares

On October 25, 2000, we announced that our Board approved a stock repurchase program and authorized the Company to purchase up to ~~100,000~~200,000 shares of its outstanding common stock. On November 11, 2002, the Board approved and authorized the Company’s repurchase of an additional ~~100,000~~200,000 shares. On May 20, 2008, the Board of Directors approved and authorized the Company to purchase an additional ~~100,000~~200,000 shares. On May 17, 2011, the Board approved and authorized the Company’s repurchase of an additional ~~100,000~~200,000 shares. On November 18, 2016, the Board of Directors approved and authorized the Company’s repurchase of an additional ~~50,000~~100,000 shares. Shares will be purchased from time to time in the open market depending on market prices and other considerations. Through ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, 349,088~~2020, 764,176 shares have been purchased.

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 6. Exhibits

Ay

3.1
~~2.1~~		~~Agreement and Plan of Merger with Peoples Bancorp of Sandy Hook is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed February 24, 2006.~~

~~2.2~~		~~Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange with Madison Financial Corporation is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed January 21, 2015~~.

~~3.1~~		Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant are incorporated by reference to ~~Exhibit 3.1~~Annex A of the Registrant’s ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2000~~Schedule 14A Proxy Statement and filed ~~May~~April 15, ~~2000~~2019.

3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed November 21, 2007.

~~3.3~~		Articles of Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the Registrant’s Annual Report of Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 and filed March 29, 2006.
31.1
~~31.1~~		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101	INS	~~The following financial information from Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for~~	XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the ~~period ended September 30, 2017, filed with~~Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded withing the ~~SEC November 13, 2017, formatted~~Inline XBRL document

101 SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document

101 CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101 DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101 LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101 PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104.1		Cover page Interactive Data File (Formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2017,and December 31, 2016, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Exhibit 101.1)

4754

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		KENTUCKY BANCSHARES, INC.

Date	~~11/13/17~~8/10/20	/s/Louis Prichard
		Louis Prichard, President and C.E.O.

Date	~~11/13/17~~8/10/20	/s/Gregory J. Dawson
		Gregory J. Dawson, Chief Financial Officer

4855


Kentucky		61-0993464
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)


P.O. Box 157, Paris, Kentucky		40362-0157
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock	KTYB	OTCQX

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐☒

Non-accelerated filer ☒☐	Smaller reporting company ☐☒

~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~
	Emerging growth company ☐

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3


Consolidated Statements of Income ~~and Comprehensive Income~~	4


Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	5

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	5
		6

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows	6
		7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7 8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33 38

Item 3.4. Controls and Procedures	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~51	45

~~Item 4.~~	~~Controls and Procedures~~	46

Part II - Other Information		46 51

Item 2.1. Legal Proceedings	51

Item 1 A. Risk Factors	51

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	46 54

Item 6. Exhibits	~~Exhibits~~54	47

Signatures	48 55


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	9/30/2017		9/30/2016		9/30/2017		9/30/2016
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees	$	7,779	$	7,630	$	22,985	$	22,432
Securities
Taxable		1,156		782		3,353		2,555
Tax exempt		625		649		1,801		1,967
Trading assets		27		44		86		117
Other		132		101		454		319
Total interest income		9,719		9,206		28,679		27,390
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		668		555		1,997		1,667
Repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		38		30		89		83
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		466		428		1,251		1,205
Note payable		48		57		147		177
Subordinated debentures		75		70		232		198
Total interest expense		1,295		1,140		3,716		3,330
Net interest income		8,424		8,066		24,963		24,060
Provision for loan losses		100		175		650		775
Net interest income after provision		8,324		7,891		24,313		23,285
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges		1,281		1,401		3,806		3,782
Loan service fee income, net		60		(26)		234		23
Trust department income		304		272		879		796
Gain on sale of available for sale securities, net		60		40		103		317
Gain (loss) on trading assets		(15)		(52)		36		48
Gain on sale of loans		415		533		1,456		1,289
Brokerage income		215		168		589		602
Debit card interchange income		763		699		2,274		2,053
Gain on bank premises		—		—		1,200		4
Other		88		201		239		218
Total other income		3,171		3,236		10,816		9,132
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits		4,592		4,540		13,545		13,472
Occupancy expenses		935		974		2,884		2,831
Repossession expenses, net		104		79		289		222
FDIC Insurance		86		106		274		444
Legal and professional fees		285		423		762		1,314
Data processing		409		396		1,309		1,249
Debit card expenses		486		391		1,304		1,078
Amortization expense of intangible assets, excluding mortgage servicing right		38		45		124		201
Advertising and marketing		212		225		636		675
Taxes other than payroll, property and income		304		282		904		836
Telephone		83		77		342		262
Postage		92		88		270		278
Loan fees		40		64		151		155
Other		669		1,064		2,276		2,536
Total other expenses		8,335		8,754		25,070		25,553
Income before taxes		3,160		2,373		10,059		6,864
Income taxes		568		8		1,920		580
Net income	$	2,592	$	2,365	$	8,139	$	6,284
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Change in unrealized gains on securities, net of tax		(348)		(800)		1,821		3,243
Comprehensive Income	$	2,244	$	1,565	$	9,960	$	9,527
Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.87	$	0.79	$	2.74	$	2.10
Diluted		0.87		0.79		2.74		2.10
Dividends per share		0.29		0.27		0.87		0.81


						Accumulated
						Other		Total
	Common Stock			Retained		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
(Dollars in thousands)	Shares	Amount		Earnings		Income		Equity
Balances, January 1, 2017	2,973,232	$	20,767	$	73,161	$	(956)	$	92,972
Common stock issued (employee stock grants of 5,423 shares, net of 1,152 shares forfeited, director stock awards of 1,386 shares and director stock options exercised of 600 shares)	7,409		64		—		—		64
Stock compensation expense	—		121		—		—		121
Common stock purchased and retired	(9,030)		(63)		(200)		—		(263)
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—		1,821		1,821
Net income	—		—		8,139		—		8,139
Dividends declared - $0.87 per share	—		—		(2,585)		—		(2,585)
Balances, September 30, 2017	2,971,611	$	20,889	$	78,515	$	865	$	100,269


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Available for Sale
September 30, 2017
U. S. government agencies	$	30,391	$	448	$	(179)	$	30,660
States and political subdivisions		100,195		2,254		(158)		102,291
Mortgage-backed - residential		157,739		330		(1,406)		156,663
Equity securities		320		22		—		342
Total	$	288,645	$	3,054	$	(1,743)	$	289,956

December 31, 2016
U. S. government agencies	$	36,454	$	373	$	(299)	$	36,528
States and political subdivisions		90,117		1,731		(716)		91,132
Mortgage-backed - residential		148,327		120		(2,677)		145,770
Equity securities		320		20		—		340
Total	$	275,218	$	2,244	$	(3,692)	$	273,770


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Value		Loss
U.S. Government agencies	$	15,617	$	(79)	$	6,056	$	(100)	$	21,673	$	(179)
States and municipals		16,449		(110)		2,271		(48)		18,720		(158)
Mortgage-backed - residential		54,303		(385)		44,469		(1,021)		98,772		(1,406)
Total temporarily impaired	$	86,369	$	(574)	$	52,796	$	(1,169)	$	139,165	$	(1,743)


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	(in thousands)
	Beginning								Ending
	Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance

Commercial	$	1,006	$	(20)	$	2	$	(56)	$	932
Real estate construction		584		—		—		101		685
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,575		(170)		3		(54)		2,354
Multi-family residential		645		—		3		(18)		630
Non-farm & non-residential		1,322		(78)		—		185		1,429
Agricultural		504		—		19		(40)		483
Consumer		561		(26)		6		(8)		533
Other		76		(214)		172		8		42
Unallocated		685		—		—		(18)		667
	$	7,958	$	(508)	$	205	$	100	$	7,755


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	(in thousands)
	Beginning								Ending
	Balance		Charge-offs		Recoveries		Provision		Balance

Commercial	$	486	$	—	$	37	$	164	$	687
Real estate Construction		411		—		15		153		579
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		2,081		(90)		8		252		2,251
Multi-family residential		458		—		7		111		576
Non-farm & non-residential		1,213		—		355		(355)		1,213
Agricultural		678		(3)		35		118		828
Consumer		525		(210)		77		163		555
Other		60		(705)		583		124		62
Unallocated		609		—		—		45		654
	$	6,521	$	(1,008)	$	1,117	$	775	$	7,405


	Individually		Collectively		Purchased
As of September 30, 2017	Evaluated for		Evaluated for		Credit
(in thousands)	Impairment		Impairment		Impaired		Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Commercial	$	—	$	932	$	—	$	932
Real estate construction		—		685		—		685
Real estate mortgage:				—
1-4 family residential		68		2,286		—		2,354
Multi-family residential		—		630		—		630
Non-farm & non-residential		—		1,429		—		1,429
Agricultural		—		483		—		483
Consumer		—		533		—		533
Other		—		42		—		42
Unallocated		—		667		—		667
	$	68	$	7,687	$	—	$	7,755
Loans:
Commercial	$	—	$	75,061	$	—	$	75,061
Real estate construction		—		34,289		—		34,289
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		420		240,836		896		242,152
Multi-family residential		—		40,924		574		41,498
Non-farm & non-residential		1,133		178,263		3		179,399
Agricultural		286		58,460		184		58,930
Consumer		—		17,520		—		17,520
Other		—		116		—		116
	$	1,839	$	645,469	$	1,657	$	648,965


			Year to Date		Year to Date
	Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Recorded		Income		Interest
(in thousands):	Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Construction	$	171	$	37	$	37
Agricultural		436		21		21

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		989		47		47
Non-farm & non-residential		1,983		70		70
Agricultural		3,868		—		—
Total	$	7,447	$	175	$	175


	Three Months Ending September 30, 2017
	Average		Interest		Cash Basis
	Recorded		Income		Interest
(in thousands):	Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
Non-farm & non-residential	$	2,431	$	17	$	17
Agricultural		491		2		2


With an allowance recorded:
Real estate mortgage:
1-4 family residential		455		1		1
	$	3,377	$	20	$	20


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2017		2016
Beginning of year	$	1,824	$	2,347
Additions		1,897		193
Sales		(911)		(571)
Fair value adjustments		(141)		(131)
End of period	$	2,669	$	1,838


				Weighted
		Weighted		Average	Aggregate
		Average		Remaining	Intrinsic
		Exercise		Contractual	Value
	Shares	Price		Term	(in thousands)
Outstanding, beginning of year	1,200	$	31.00
Granted	—		—			—
Forfeited or expired	—		—			—
Exercised	(600)		31.00
Outstanding, end of period	600	$	31.00	5 months	$	6
Vested and expected to vest	600	$	31.00	5 months	$	6
Exercisable, end of period	600	$	31.00	5 months	$	6


		Weighted-Average		Fair
		Grant-Date		Value
Nonvested Shares	Shares	Fair Value		Per Share
Nonvested at January 1, 2017	10,636	$	253,518	$	23.84
Granted	—		—		—
Vested	(4,348)		(97,747)		22.48
Forfeited	(117)		(3,004)		—
Nonvested at September 30, 2017	6,171	$	152,767	$	24.76


	Unrealized
	Gains and Losses on
	Available for Sale
	Securities
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016
Beginning Balance	$	(956)	$	359

Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period, net of tax		1,889		3,452

Reclassification adjustment for:

Securities gains realized in income		103		317
Income taxes		(35)		(108)
		68		209

Net current period other comprehensive income		1,821		3,243

Ending balance	$	865	$	3,602


Details about	Amount		Affected Line Item
Accumulated Other	Reclassified From		in the Statement
Comprehensive	Accumulated Other		Where Net
Income Components	Comprehensive Income		Income is Presented

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities	$	103	Gain on sale of available for sale securities, net
		35	Income taxes
		68	Net income


	Three Months Ended September 30
	2017 vs. 2016
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
	Volume		Rate		Net Change
INTEREST INCOME
Loans	$	(50)	$	199	$	149
Investment Securities		290		43		333
Other		(19)		50		31
Total Interest Income		221		292		513
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits
Demand		12		80		92
Savings		—		(1)		(1)
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit and Other Time Deposits		(11)		33		22
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings		26		(22)		4
Federal Home Loan
Bank advances		28		10		38
Total Interest Expense		55		100		155
Net Interest Income	$	166	$	192	$	358


									To Be Well
									Capitalized
									Under Prompt
					For Capital				Corrective
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes				Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in Thousands)
September 30, 2017
Consolidated
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	100,029	14.2	%	$	56,479	8.0	%		N/A	N/A
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		92,189	13.1			42,359	6.0			N/A	N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		85,189	12.1			31,770	4.5			N/A	N/A
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		92,189	9.1			40,607	4.0			N/A	N/A

Bank Only
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	98,654	14.7	%	$	53,759	8.0	%	$	67,198	10.0	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		90,814	13.5			40,319	6.0			53,759	8.0
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		90,814	13.5			30,239	4.5			43,679	6.5
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		90,814	9.0			40,469	4.0			50,587	5.0

December 31, 2016
Consolidated
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	94,343	13.9	%	$	54,280	8.0	%		N/A	N/A
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		86,718	12.8			40,710	6.0			N/A	N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		79,718	11.8			30,533	4.5			N/A	N/A
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		86,718	8.7			39,795	4.0			N/A	N/A

Bank Only
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	95,118	14.0	%	$	54,246	8.0	%	$	67,808	10.0	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		87,493	12.9			40,685	6.0			54,246	8.0
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)		87,493	12.9			30,513	4.5			44,075	6.5
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		87,493	8.8			39,671	4.0			49,588	5.0


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	(in thousands)
		2017			2016
Balance at Beginning of Period	$	7,541		$	6,521
Amounts Charged-Off:
Commercial		35			—
1-4 family residential		203			90
Multi-family residential		—			—
Non-farm & non-residential		78			—
Agricultural		—			3
Consumer and other		810			915
Total Charged-off Loans		1,126			1,008
Recoveries on Amounts Previously Charged-off:
Commercial		17			37
Real Estate Construction		1			15
1-4 family residential		8			8
Multi-family residential		10			7
Non-farm & non-residential		—			355
Agricultural		47			35
Consumer and other		607			660
Total Recoveries		690			1,117
Net Charge-offs (Recoveries)		436			(109)
Provision for Loan Losses		650			775
Balance at End of Period		7,755			7,405
Loans
Average		652,387			642,998
At September 30,		648,965			659,970
As a Percentage of Average Loans:
Net Charge-offs for the period		0.07	%		(0.02)	%
Provision for Loan Losses for the period		0.10	%		0.12	%
Allowance as a Multiple of Net Charge-offs annualized		13.3			(51.0)


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	(in thousands)
	2017			2016
Balance at Beginning of Period:	$	7,958		$	7,259
Amounts Charged-Off:
Commercial		20			—
1-4 family residential		170			26
Non-farm & non-residential		78			—
Agricultural		—			3
Consumer and other		240			253
Total Charged-off Loans		508			282
Recoveries on Amounts Previously Charged-off:
Commercial		2			3
Real Estate Construction		0			2
1-4 family residential		3			1
Multi-family residential		3			3
Non-farm & non-residential		0			82
Agricultural		19			12
Consumer and other		178			150
Total Recoveries		205			253
Net Charge-offs		303			29
Provision for Loan Losses		100			175
Balance at End of Period		7,755			7,405
Loans
Average		647,103			657,336
At September 30,		648,965			659,970
As a Percentage of Average Loans:
Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) for the period		0.05	%		0.00	%
Provision for Loan Losses for the period		0.02	%		0.03	%
Allowance as a Multiple of Net Charge-offs annualized		6.4			63.8


	Level
Change in basis points:	- 100			Rates		+ 100			+ 300
Year One (10/17 - 9/18)
Net interest income	$	32,881		$	33,724	$	33,658		$	33,547
Net interest income dollar change		(843)			N/A		(66)			(177)
Net interest income percentage change		(2.5)	%		N/A		(0.2)	%		(0.5)	%
Board approved limit		>(4.0)	%		N/A		>(4.0)	%		>(10.0)	%