UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2021~~

ORMarch 31, 2022


☐
	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 001-38944

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		81-5266573
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 350

South San Francisco, CA94080

(650) 487-6488

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share	~~AKRO~~	AKRO		The Nasdaq Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~Yes~~ ☒Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ~~Yes~~ ☒Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	☐		~~Accelerated filer~~	☐Accelerated filer	
Non-accelerated filer	☒		Smaller reporting company	☒
			Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule ~~12b-2~~12b‑2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~November 9, 2021,~~April 29, 2022, the registrant had ~~34,888,302~~35,022,935 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF THE MATERIAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business ~~include~~includes:

•

Enrollment and retention of patients in clinical trials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside our control, including difficulties in identifying patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”), significant competition for recruiting such patients in clinical trials, and restrictions on patients and investigators related to the ~~following:~~

●

Enrollment and retention of patients in clinical trials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside our control, including difficulties in identifying patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”) and significant competition for recruiting such patients in clinical trials.

●

~~We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than us.~~

●

Failures or delays in the commencement or completion of, or ambiguous or negative results from, our planned clinical trials of our product candidates could result in increased costs to us and could delay, prevent, or limit our ability to generate revenue and continue our business.

●

Clinical development is uncertain and our clinical trials for efruxifermin (“EFX”) and any future product candidates may experience delays, which would adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approvals or commercialize these programs on a timely basis or at all, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

●

We rely and will continue to rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval of or commercialize any potential product candidates.

●

The manufacture of our product candidates is complex and we may encounter difficulties in production. If we or any of our third-party manufacturers encounter such difficulties, or fail to meet rigorously enforced regulatory standards, our ability to provide supply of our product candidates for clinical trials or our products for patients, if approved, could be delayed or stopped, or we may be unable to maintain a commercially viable cost structure.

●

~~We are heavily dependent on the success of EFX, our only product candidate.~~

●

~~We may develop EFX, and potentially future product candidates, in combination with other therapies, which exposes us to additional risks.~~

●

If we fail to develop and successfully commercialize other product candidates, our business and future prospects may be harmed and our business will be more vulnerable to any problems that we encounter in developing and commercializing our product candidate.

●

If we are not successful in discovering, developing, receiving regulatory approval for and commercializing EFX and any future product candidates, our ability to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.

●

~~We may be required to make significant payments under our license agreement for EFX.~~

●

The regulatory approval processes of the U.S Food and Drug Administrations (the “FDA”) and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. Our inability to obtain regulatory approval for EFX or any future product candidate would substantially harm our business.

●

Even if we are able to obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidate or any future product candidates, if they exhibit harmful side effects after approval, our regulatory approvals could be revoked or otherwise negatively impacted, and we could be subject to costly and damaging product liability claims.

●

Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, transparency and other healthcare laws and regulations, which, if violated, could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future earnings.

●

~~We have incurred significant losses since our inception and we expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.~~

●

~~We currently have a limited operating history, have not generated any revenue to date, and may never become profitable.~~

●

We will require additional capital to finance our operations, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. As a result, we may not complete the development and commercialization of our product candidate or develop any future product candidates.

●

Business interruptions resulting from the ongoing coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) outbreak or similar public health crises could cause a disruption of the development of our product candidates and adversely impact our business.

ongoing coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) pandemic.

•

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than us.

•

Failures or delays in the commencement or completion of, or ambiguous or negative results from our planned clinical trials of our product candidates could result in increased costs to us and could delay, prevent, or limit our ability to generate revenue and continue our business.

•

We are heavily dependent on the success of EFX, our only product candidate.

•

We may develop EFX, and potentially future product candidates, in combination with other therapies, which exposes us to additional risks.

•

We may be required to make significant payments under our license agreement for EFX.

•

The regulatory approval processes of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. Our inability to obtain regulatory approval for EFX or any future product candidate would substantially harm our business.

•

We have incurred significant losses since our inception and we expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

•

We currently have a limited operating history, have not generated any revenue to date, and may never become profitable.

•

Business interruptions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or similar public health crises, as well as from geopolitical and military conflict such as the ongoing warfare in Ukraine, could cause a disruption of the development of our product candidates and adversely impact our business.

Table of Contents



		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL ~~INFORMATION~~INFORMATION	6
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)	7
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited)	8
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	9
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	10
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2725
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3732
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3733
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	38
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3834
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3834
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	8682
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	8682
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	8782
Item 5.	Other Information	8782
Item 6.	Exhibits	8883
Signatures		8984

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management and expected market growth are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.

These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements about:

●

•

the success, cost and timing of our product development activities and clinical trials, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of studies or trials and related preparatory work, the period during which the results of the trials will become available, and our research and development programs;

●

our ability to complete enrollment in our ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial of EFX in NASH patients with F2/F3 fibrosis, known as the HARMONY study, including the ability to obtain data and maintain our expected timelines during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;

●

our ability to complete enrollment in our ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial of EFX in cirrhotic NASH patients with F4 fibrosis, known as the SYMMETRY study, including the ability to obtain data and maintain our expected timelines during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;

●

the potential for COVID-19 or other pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease, to disrupt our business plans, product development activities, ongoing clinical trials, including the timing and enrollment of patients, the health of our employees and the strength of our supply chain;

●

~~our ability to advance any product candidate into or successfully complete any clinical trial;~~

●

~~our ability to successfully manufacture our product candidates for future clinical trials or for commercial use, if approved;~~

●

~~the potential for our identified research priorities to advance our technologies;~~

●

our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval, if obtained, of EFX or any future product candidates, and any related restrictions, limitations and/or warnings in the label of an approved product candidate;

●

~~the ability to license additional intellectual property relating to any future product candidates and to comply with our existing license agreement;~~

●

~~our ability to commercialize our products in light of the intellectual property rights of others;~~

●

~~the success of competing therapies that are or become available;~~

●

~~our ability to obtain funding for our operations, including funding necessary to complete further development and commercialization of our product candidates;~~

●

~~the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved;~~

●

~~our plans to research, develop and commercialize our product candidates;~~

●

~~our ability to attract collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;~~

●

~~future agreements with third parties in connection with the commercialization of our product candidates and any other approved product;~~

●

~~the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets;~~

●

~~the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates;~~

●

~~regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;~~

●

~~our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;~~

●

~~our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel;~~

●

~~the accuracy of our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;~~

●

~~the impact of laws and regulations; and~~

●

~~our expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product candidates.~~

•

our ability to successfully conduct and complete our ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial of EFX in patients with NASH who have F2 or F3 fibrosis, known as the HARMONY study, including the ability to obtain data and maintain our expected timelines during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;

•

our ability to complete enrollment in our ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial of EFX in patients with NASH who have cirrhosis (F4 fibrosis, compensated), known as the SYMMETRY study, including the ability to obtain data and maintain our expected timelines during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;

•

our ability to advance any product candidate into or successfully complete any clinical trial;

•

our ability to successfully manufacture our product candidates for future clinical trials or for commercial use, if approved;

•

the potential for our identified research priorities to advance our technologies;

•

the ability to license additional intellectual property relating to any future product candidates and to comply with our existing license agreement;

•

our ability to commercialize our products in light of the intellectual property rights of others;

•

the success of competing therapies that are or become available;

•

our ability to obtain funding for our operations, including funding necessary to complete further development and commercialization of our product candidates;

•

the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved;

•

our plans to research, develop and commercialize our product candidates;

•

our ability to attract collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;

•

future agreements with third parties in connection with the commercialization of our product candidates and any other approved product;

•

the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets;

•

the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates;

•

regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;

•

our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;

•

our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel;

•

the accuracy of our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;

•

the impact of laws and regulations; and

Table of Contents

•

our expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product candidates.

We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly in the “Risk Factors” section, that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, collaborations, joint ventures or investments that we may make or into which we may enter.

You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we reference herein and have filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits hereto completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

NOTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS

Akero Therapeutics, Inc. is the owner of the AKERO trademark, as well as certain other trademarks, including design versions of some of these trademarks. The symbols ™ and ® are not used in connection with the presentation of these trademarks in this report and their absence does not indicate a lack of trademark rights. Certain other trademarks used in this report are the property of third-party trademark owners and may be presented with or without trademark references.

All brand names or trademarks appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “Akero,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Akero Therapeutics, Inc. and its subsidiary.

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

~~(Unaudited)~~

September 30, 2021

December 31, 2020
Assets




Current assets:




Cash and cash equivalents

$
164,935

$
187,242
Short-term marketable securities

50,146

81,145
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

6,726

2,958
Total current assets

221,807

271,345
Property and equipment, net

101

131
Operating lease right-of-use asset

1,511

1,662
Other assets, noncurrent

114

201
Total assets

$
223,533

$
273,339
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity


Current liabilities:




Accounts payable

$
6,784

$
3,428
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

16,756

9,683
Total current liabilities

23,540

13,111
Operating lease liability, noncurrent

1,365

1,516
Total liabilities

24,905

14,627
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)




Stockholders’ equity:




Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 34,875,302 and 34,741,649 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively

4

4
Additional paid-in capital

476,521

468,238
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(17)

(3)
Accumulated deficit

(277,880)

(209,527)
Total stockholders’ equity

198,628

258,712
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$
223,533

$
273,339

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

150,489

$

150,483

Short-term marketable securities

14,887

37,775

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

2,558

5,324

Total current assets

167,934

193,582

Property and equipment, net

79

90

Right of use asset

1,406

1,459

Other assets, noncurrent

468

417

Total assets

$

169,887

$

195,548

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

4,450

$

6,706

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

17,647

18,422

Total current liabilities

22,097

25,128

Operating lease liability, noncurrent

1,255

1,311

Total liabilities

23,352

26,439

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

Stockholders’ equity:

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021; 35,022,935 and 34,900,727 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively

4

4

Additional paid-in capital

482,894

479,436

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(30
)

(27
)
Accumulated deficit

(336,333
)

(310,304
)
Total stockholders’ equity

146,535

169,109

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

169,887

$

195,548

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,


2021

2020

2021

2020

Operating expenses:









Research and development

$
19,470

$
17,379

$
54,048

$
39,207

General and administrative

4,883

4,159

14,399

11,164

Total operating expenses

24,353

21,538

68,447

50,371

Loss from operations

(24,353)

(21,538)

(68,447)

(50,371)

Other income, net

23

135

94

875

Net loss

(24,330)

(21,403)

(68,353)

(49,496)

Net unrealized gain (loss) on short-term marketable securities

(8)

(74)

(14)

22

Comprehensive loss

$
(24,338)

$
(21,477)

$
(68,367)

$
(49,474)

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted

$
(0.70)

$
(0.63)

$
(1.96)

$
(1.63)

Weighted-average number of shares used in computing net loss per common share, basic and diluted

34,862,116

34,002,769

34,807,439

30,381,671

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2022

2021

Operating expenses:

Research and development

$

20,514

$

10,602

General and administrative

5,537

4,526

Total operating expenses

26,051

15,128

Loss from operations

(26,051
)

(15,128
)
Other income

22

38

Net loss

(26,029
)

(15,090
)
Net unrealized (loss) gain on short-term marketable securities

(3
)

1

Comprehensive loss

$

(26,032
)

$

(15,089
)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted

$

(0.74
)

$

(0.43
)
Weighted-average number of shares used in computing net loss per common share, basic and diluted

35,005,501

34,744,275

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

~~(Unaudited)~~

Additional

Accumulated Other

Total

Common Stock

Paid-In-

Comprehensive

Accumulated

Stockholders’


Shares

Amount

Capital

Gain (Loss)

Deficit

Equity (Deficit)
Balances at December 31, 2020

34,741,649

$
4

$
468,238

$
(3)

$
(209,527)

$
258,712
Exercise of stock options

28,670

—

24

—

—

24
Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

9

—

—

9
Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

2,364

—

—

2,364
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

1

—

1
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(15,090)

(15,090)
Balances at March 31, 2021

34,770,319

$
4

$
470,635

$
(2)

$
(224,617)

$
246,020
Exercise of stock options

60,333

—

393

—

—

393
Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

9

—

—

9
Issuance of common stock pursuant to ESPP purchases

10,130

—

215

—

—

215
Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

2,436

—

—

2,436
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

(7)

—

(7)
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(28,933)

(28,933)
Balances at June 30, 2021

34,840,782

$
4

$
473,688

$
(9)

$
(253,550)

$
220,133
Exercise of stock options

34,520

—

219

—

—

219
Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

2

—

—

2
Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

2,612

—

—

2,612
Net unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

(8)

—

(8)
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(24,330)

(24,330)
Balances at September 30, 2021

34,875,302

$
4

$
476,521

$
(17)

$
(277,880)

$
198,628

Balances at December 31, 2019

28,567,837

$
3

$
259,049

$
(6)

$
(130,320)

$
128,726
Exercise of stock options

103,385

—

112

—

—

112
Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

30

—

—

30
Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

1,238

—

—

1,238
Disgorgement of stockholders' short-swing profits, net

—

—

52

—

—

52
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

51

—

51
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(11,886)

(11,886)
Balances at March 31, 2020

28,671,222

$
3

$
260,481

$
45

$
(142,206)

$
118,323
Exercise of stock options

3,202

—

9

—

—

9
Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

13

—

—

13
Issuance of common stock pursuant to ESPP purchases

9,255

—

158

—

—

158
Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

1,322

—

—

1,322
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

45

—

45
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(16,207)

(16,207)
Balances at June 30, 2020

28,683,679

$
3

$
261,983

$
90

$
(158,413)

$
103,663
Issuance of common stock upon closing of secondary public
offering, net of issuance costs and underwriting fees of $906

6,012,390

1

202,553

—

—

202,554
Exercise of stock options

24,606

—

163

—

—

163
Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

9

—

—

9
Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

1,546

—

—

1,546
Net unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

(74)

—

(74)
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(21,403)

(21,403)
Balances at September 30, 2020

34,720,675

$
4

$
466,254

$
16

$
(179,816)

$
286,458

(Unaudited)

Accumulated

Additional

Other

Total

Common Stock

Paid-In-

Comprehensive

Accumulated

Stockholders’

Shares

Amount

Capital

Gain (Loss)

Deficit

Equity (Deficit)

Balances at December 31, 2021

34,900,727

$

4

$

479,436

$

(27
)

$

(310,304
)

$

169,109

Exercise of stock options

122,208

—

147

—

—

147

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

3,311

—

—

3,311

Net unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

(3
)

—

(3
)
Net loss

—

—

—

—

(26,029
)

(26,029
)
Balances at March 31, 2022

35,022,935

$

4

$

482,894

$

(30
)

$

(336,333
)

$

146,535

Balances at December 31, 2020

34,741,649

$

4

$

468,238

$

(3
)

$

(209,527
)

$

258,712

Exercise of stock options

28,670

—

24

—

—

24

Vesting of restricted stock

—

—

9

—

—

9

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

2,364

—

—

2,364

Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities

—

—

—

1

—

1

Net loss

—

—

—

—

(15,090
)

(15,090
)
Balances at March 31, 2021

34,770,319

$

4

$

470,635

$

(2
)

$

(224,617
)

$

246,020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

~~(Unaudited)~~

(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30,


2021

2020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES




Net loss

$
(68,353)

$
(49,496)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:


Stock-based compensation expense

7,412

4,106
Depreciation

30

6
Non-cash lease expense

151

147
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on short-term investments

705

(41)
Unrealized foreign exchange gain and loss

(113)

—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:


Prepaid expenses and other assets

(3,229)

(4,539)
Accounts payable

3,469

3,689
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

7,076

(1,183)
Other liabilities

-

(2)
Operating lease liability

(134)

(96)
Net cash used in operating activities

(52,986)

(47,409)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES


Purchase of short-term marketable securities

(43,561)

(106,041)
Proceeds from sales of short-term marketable securities

—

9,864
Proceeds from maturities of short-term marketable securities

73,841

68,660
Purchase of property and equipment

—

(143)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

30,280

(27,660)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES




Proceeds from the issuance of common stock in follow-on public offering, net of issuance costs and underwriting fees

—

202,554
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

636

284
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock purchase plan purchases

215

158
Proceeds from the disgorgement of stockholders' short-swing profits, net

—

52
Payment of deferred offering costs

(492)

—
Net cash provided by financing activities

359

203,048
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

(22,347)

127,979
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the period

187,390

64,848
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the period

$
165,043

$
192,827

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:




ROU asset obtained in exchange for operating lease liability

$
—

$
1,751
Change in net unrealizable gain (loss) on marketable securities

$
(14)

$
22
Remeasurement of ROU asset and lease liability

$
—

$
173
Deferred offering costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities

$
4

$

—

Three Months Ended March 31,

2022

2021

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net loss

$

(26,029
)

$

(15,090
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

Stock-based compensation expense

3,311

2,364

Depreciation

11

11

Non-cash lease expense

53

50

Net amortization of premiums and discounts on short-term investments

135

121

Unrealized foreign exchange gain and loss

(9
)

—

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Prepaid expenses and other assets

2,730

(2,787
)
Accounts payable

(2,247
)

1,177

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

(782
)

(4,143
)
Operating lease liability

(49
)

(49
)
Net cash used in operating activities

(22,876
)

(18,346
)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from maturities of short-term marketable securities

22,750

19,000

Net cash provided by investing activities

22,750

19,000

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from the exercise of stock options

147

24

Payment of deferred offering costs

(15
)

—

Net cash provided by financing activities

132

24

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

6

678

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of the year

150,591

187,390

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the year

$

150,597

$

188,068

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:

Deferred offering costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current
liabilities

15

—

Change in net unrealizable (loss) gain on marketable securities

$

(3
)

$

1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Nature of the business and basis of presentation

Akero Therapeutics, Inc., together with its wholly owned subsidiary Akero Securities Corporation, (“Akero” or the “Company”) is a ~~cardio-metabolic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH,~~clinical-stage company dedicated to developing ~~pioneering medicines designed to restore~~transformational treatments for patients with serious metabolic ~~balance and improve overall health.~~diseases marked by high unmet medical need, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, a disease without any approved therapies. NASH is a severe form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or NAFLD, characterized by inflammation and fibrosis in the liver that can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, cancer and death. The Company’s lead product candidate is efruxifermin, or EFX, which is an analog of fibroblast growth factor 21, or FGF21, which is an endogenously expressed hormone that protects against cellular stress and regulates metabolism of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins throughout the body. EFX is currently being evaluated in two Phase 2b clinical trials in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH: the HARMONY study in patients with pre-cirrhotic NASH (F2-F3 fibrosis) and the SYMMETRY study in cirrhotic patients (F4 fibrosis, compensated). The Company previously conducted a Phase 2a clinical trial, the BALANCED study, to evaluate EFX in the treatment of patients with biopsy-confirmed ~~NASH patients.~~NASH. The main portion of this study in ~~NASH~~ patients with F1-F3 fibrosis showed EFX’s potential to reverse fibrosis, resolve NASH, improve liver health, improve glycemic control and improve lipoprotein profile. An expansion cohort in ~~F4 NASH~~ patients with ~~compensated cirrhosis~~cirrhotic NASH (F4, compensated) showed comparable results. The Company initiated a Phase 2b clinical trial, the HARMONY study, to evaluate EFX in the treatment of NASH patients with F2/F3 fibrosis in February 2021 and randomized the first patient in March 2021. The Company initiated a second Phase 2b clinical trial in F4 NASH patients with compensated cirrhosis, the SYMMETRY study, in July 2021. Based on clinical data to date, the Company believes EFX has the potential to be a ~~highly-differentiated,~~highly differentiated, best-in-class FGF21 analog and ~~foundational~~promising NASH ~~monotherapy.~~monotherapy, if approved.

The Company is subject to risks and uncertainties common to early-stage companies in the biotechnology industry, including, but not limited to, completion and success of clinical testing, development by competitors of new technological innovations, compliance with governmental regulations, dependence on key personnel and protection of proprietary technology and the ability to secure additional capital to fund operations. EFX will require extensive clinical testing prior to regulatory approval and commercialization. These efforts require significant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel, and infrastructure and extensive compliance-reporting capabilities. Even if the Company’s drug development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will realize significant revenue from product sales.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company after elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions. All adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods presented have been reflected.

Liquidity

In accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), the Company has evaluated whether there are certain conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued.

Since its inception, the Company has funded its operations primarily with proceeds from sales of redeemable convertible preferred stock and most recently with proceeds from its initial public offering (“IPO”) in June 2019 and a follow-on public offering of its common stock in July 2020. The Company has incurred recurring losses since its inception, including net losses of ~~$68,353~~$26,029 and ~~$49,496~~$15,090 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively, and net losses of ~~$79,207~~$100,777 and ~~$43,755~~$79,207 for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and ~~2019,~~2020, respectively. In addition, as of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the Company had an accumulated deficit of ~~$277,880.~~$336,333. The Company expects to continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future. As of ~~November 12, 2021,~~May 6, 2022, the issuance date of these

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company expects that its existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

marketable securities of ~~$215,081~~$165,376 as of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, will be sufficient to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least 12 months from the issuance date of these condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company expects that it will require additional funding ~~beyond this time~~ to complete the clinical development of EFX, commercialize EFX, if it receives regulatory approval, and pursue in-licenses or acquisitions of other product candidates.

If the Company is unable to obtain funding, the Company will be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some or all of its research and development programs, product portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect its business prospects, or the Company may be unable to continue operations. Although management continues to pursue these plans, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining sufficient funding on terms acceptable to the Company to fund continuing operations, if at all.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Unaudited interim financial statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with GAAP for interim financial reporting and as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s audited annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s ~~condensed consolidated balance sheet~~financial position as of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 and the condensed consolidated ~~statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the condensed consolidated statements~~statement of stockholders’ equity (deficit) ~~for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 and the condensed consolidated statements~~as of ~~cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.~~March 31, 2022. The financial data and other information disclosed in these notes related to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~ are unaudited. The results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, any other interim periods, or any future year or period.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the ~~accrual~~recognition of research and development expenses, ~~the valuations of common stock~~stock-based compensation expense and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, known trends and other market-specific or other relevant factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates when there are changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of amounts invested in money market accounts.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

Short-term marketable securities

The Company invests in short-term marketable securities, primarily money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and corporate debt securities. The Company continually evaluates the credit ratings of its investment portfolio and underlying securities. The Company invests in accordance with its investment policy and invests at the date of purchase in securities with high ratings from top rating agencies. The Company classifies its

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

short-term marketable securities as available-for-sale securities and reports them at fair value in short-term marketable securities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with related unrealized gains and losses included within accumulated other comprehensive ~~gain~~income (loss) on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, which is included in other income on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. ~~Realized gains and losses and declines in~~When the fair value ~~judged to be other-than-temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities are included in other income. The~~is below the amortized cost of ~~securities sold~~a marketable security, an estimate of expected credit losses is ~~based on~~made. The credit-related impairment amount is recognized in the ~~specific identification method. Interest~~condensed consolidated statements of operations. Credit losses are recognized through the use of an allowance for credit losses account in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and ~~dividends on securities classified~~subsequent improvements in expected credit losses are recognized as ~~available-for-sale are included~~a reversal of an amount in ~~other income.~~

~~The Company regularly reviews all its investments for other-than-temporary declines in estimated fair value. This review includes~~ the consideration of the cause of the impairment, including the creditworthiness of the security issuers, the number of securities in an unrealized loss position, the severity and duration of the unrealized losses, whetherallowance account. If the Company has the intent to sell the ~~securities and whether~~security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the ~~securities before the~~security prior to recovery of ~~their~~its amortized cost ~~basis. When~~basis, then the ~~Company determines that~~allowance for the ~~decline in estimated fair value~~credit loss is written-off and the excess of ~~an investment is below~~ the amortized cost basis ~~and the decline is other-than-temporary, the carrying value~~ of the ~~security will be reduced and a loss will be~~asset over its fair value is recorded ~~for~~in the ~~amount~~condensed consolidated statements of ~~such decline.~~

~~Restricted cash~~

~~As of September 30, 2021~~operations. There were no credit losses recorded during the periods ended March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021.

Restricted cash

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company was required to maintain a separate cash balance of ~~$108~~$108 for the benefit of the landlord in connection with the Company’s Gateway office space lease in South San Francisco, California (the “Gateway Lease”), which is classified within other assets (non-current) on the condensed consolidated balance sheets (see Note 11).

As of December 31, 2020, the Company was required to maintain a separate cash balance of $40 to collateralize corporate credit cards with a bank, which is classified within other assets (non-current) on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Concentrations of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities. Periodically, the Company maintains deposits in accredited financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. The Company deposits its cash investments in financial institutions that it believes have high credit quality and has not experienced any losses on such accounts and does not believe it is exposed to any unusual credit risk beyond the normal credit risk associated with commercial banking relationships. At ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, all of the Company's cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were held at one accredited financial institution.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is three years for furniture and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. Depreciation and amortization begins at the time the asset is placed in service.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

Leases

The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception by assessing whether the arrangement contains an identified asset and whether the Company has the right to control the identified asset. Right-of-use, or ROU, assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of future lease payments over the lease term. ROU assets are based on the measurement of the lease liability and are further adjusted by any lease payments made prior to or on lease commencement, lease incentives received and initial direct costs incurred, as applicable. The Company has elected to not recognize leases with a lease term of one year or less on its balance sheet. Operating lease costs included in the measurement of the lease are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Variable lease costs are expensed as incurred as an operating expense.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

The Company determines the lease classification and the present value of future lease payments at the time of the lease commencement using an incremental borrowing rate that it estimates based upon the Company’s credit risk and term of the lease. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts has not historically been readily determinable and the Company must therefore use the appropriate incremental borrowing rate to measure its leases. To estimate the incremental borrowing rate, a credit rating applicable to the Company is estimated using a synthetic credit rating analysis since the Company does not currently have a rating agency-based credit rating.

Research and development costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of costs incurred to discover, research and develop drug candidates, including personnel expenses, stock-based compensation expense, third-party license fees and external costs including fees paid to consultants, contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, and clinical research organizations, or CROs, in connection with drug product manufacturing, nonclinical studies and clinical trials, and other related clinical trial fees, such as for investigator grants, patient screening, laboratory work, clinical trial database management, clinical trial material management and statistical compilation and analysis. Non-refundable prepayments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities are recorded as prepaid expenses. Such amounts are recognized as an expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, or until it is no longer expected that the goods will be delivered or the servicesrendered.~~rendered.~~

Costs incurred in obtaining technology licenses are charged immediately to research and development expense if the technology licensed has not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future uses.

Research contract costs and accruals

The Company has entered into various research and development and other agreements with commercial firms, researchers and others for provisions of goods and services. These agreements are generally cancelable, and the related costs are recorded as research and development expenses as incurred. The Company records accruals for estimated ongoing research and development costs. When evaluating the adequacy of the accrued liabilities, the Company analyzes progress of the studies or clinical trials, including the phase or completion of events, invoices received and contracted costs. Significant judgments and estimates are made in determining the accrued balances at the end of any reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from the Company's estimates.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

Stock-based compensation

The Company measures all stock-based awards granted to employees and nonemployees based on the fair value on the date of the grant and recognizes compensation expense for those awards over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award, on a straight-line basis. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for awards that contain performance-based conditions using the accelerated attribution method when management determines it is probable that the performance condition will be satisfied. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The Company estimates the fair value of stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Prior to the Company’s initial public offering, the exercise price for all stock options granted was at the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock as determined on the date of grant by the Company’s board of directors.

The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires inputs based on certain subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility, the expected term of the option, the risk-free interest rate for a period that approximates the expected term of the option, and the Company's expected dividend yield. The Company went public in June 2019 and accordingly, lacks sufficient company-specific historical and implied volatility information for its shares traded in the public markets.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

Therefore, it estimates its expected share price volatility based on the historical volatility of publicly traded peer companies and expects to continue to do so until such time as it has adequate historical data regarding the volatility of its own traded share price. The expected term of the Company's stock options has been determined utilizing the "simplified" method for awards that qualify as "plain-vanilla" options. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant of the award for time periods approximately equal to the expected term of the award. Expected dividend yield is based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends on common stock and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The fair value of each common stock award is estimated on the date of grant based on the fair value of the Company's common stock on that same date.

Compensation expense for purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is recognized based on the fair value of the common stock estimated based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the date of offering, less the purchase discount percentage provided for in the plan.

The Company classifies stock-based compensation expense in its condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the same manner in which the award recipient's payroll costs are classified or in which the award recipient's service payments are classified.

Comprehensive loss

Comprehensive loss includes net loss as well as other changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) that result from transactions and economic events other than those with stockholders. The Company’s comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and changes in unrealized gains and losses on its short-term marketable securities.

~~Emerging growth company~~

The Company is an emerging growth company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, companies have extended transition periods available for complying with new or revised accounting standards. The Company has elected this exemption to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply.

On the last business day of the second quarter in 2021, the aggregate market value of the Company shares held by non-affiliate stockholders exceeded $700 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2021, the Company will be considered a large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, and will cease to be an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. The Company will no longer be exempt from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and our independent registered public accounting firm will

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

evaluate and report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Company will also no longer be permitted to take advantage of reduced reporting requirements for smaller reporting companies.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

On January 1, 2021, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU 2019-12), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 was effective beginning January 1, 2021. The adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted~~

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~ASU~~ 2016-13, ~~Measurement of~~Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ~~on Financial Instruments (“~~(Topic 326) ("ASU ~~2016-13”~~2016-13")~~. ASU 2016-13 requires measurement and recognition of expected~~, which introduced a new methodology for accounting for credit losses ~~for~~on financial ~~assets. In November 2019, the FASB issued No.~~instruments, including available-for-sale debt securities. The Company adopted ASU ~~2019-10 to modify the effective date for ASU 2016-13 for other public business entities includes smaller reporting companies,~~2016-03 as ~~defined by the SEC. This guidance will become effective for the Company beginning~~of January 1, 2021. For available-for-sale debt securities with unrealized losses, those losses are recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the ~~first quarter~~amortized cost of ~~2023. Early adoption is permitted.~~the underlying security. The ~~Company is currently evaluating the impact that the~~ adoption of ASU ~~2016-13 will~~2016-03 did not have a material impact on ~~its~~the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

3. Fair value measurements

3. ~~Fair value of financial assets and liabilities~~

Certain assets and liabilities of the Company are carried at fair value under GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable:

●

•

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

●

Level 2—Observable inputs (other than Level 1 quoted prices), such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

●

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that are significant to determining the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques.

•

Level 2—Observable inputs (other than Level 1 quoted prices), such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are 0t active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

•

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or 0 market activity that are significant to determining the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques.

The following is a summary of our financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020:~~2021:


	March 31, 2022
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	114,548	$	114,548	$	—	$	—
Corporate debt securities		14,887		—		14,887		—
	$	129,435	$	114,548	$	14,887	$	—

	December 31, 2021
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	116,261	$	116,261	$	—	$	—
Corporate debt securities		37,775		—		37,775		—
	$	154,036	$	116,261	$	37,775	$	—

September 30, 2021

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3
Money market funds

$
139,039

$
139,039

$
—

$
—
Commercial paper

7,000

—

7,000

—
Corporate debt securities

43,146

—

43,146

—

$
189,185

$
139,039

$
50,146

$
—

December 31, 2020

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3
Money market funds

$
158,023

$
158,023

$
—

$
—
Commercial paper

47,955

—

47,955

—
Corporate debt securities

33,190

—

33,190

—

$
239,168

$
158,023

$
81,145

$
—

~~Commercial paper and corporate~~Corporate debt securities were valued by the Company using quoted prices in active markets for similar securities, which represent a Level 2 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The carrying values of the Company’s prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there were 0 transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

4. Short-term marketable securities

The following is a summary of short-term marketable securities as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021:


	March 31, 2022
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Credit losses		Fair value
Money market funds	$	114,548	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	114,548
Corporate debt securities		14,917		—		(30	)		—		14,887
	$	129,465	$	—	$	(30	)	$	—	$	129,435

Cash equivalents										$	114,548
Short-term marketable securities											14,887
										$	129,435

	December 31, 2021
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Credit losses		Fair value
Money market funds	$	116,261	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	116,261
Corporate debt securities		37,802		—		(27	)		—		37,775
	$	154,063	$	—	$	(27	)	$	—	$	154,036

Cash equivalents										$	116,261
Short-term marketable securities											37,775
										$	154,036

September 30, 2021

Amortized cost

Gross unrealized gains

Gross unrealized losses

Fair value
Money market funds

$
139,039

$
—

$
—

$
139,039
Commercial paper

7,000

—

—

7,000
Corporate debt securities

43,163

—

(17)

43,146

$
189,202

$
—

$
(17)

$
189,185

Cash equivalents

$
139,039
Short-term marketable securities

50,146

$
189,185

December 31, 2020

Amortized cost

Gross unrealized gains

Gross unrealized losses

Fair value
Money market funds

$
158,023

$
—

$
—

$
158,023
Commercial paper

47,955

—

—

47,955
Corporate debt securities

33,193

—

(3)

33,190

$
239,171

$
—

$
(3)

$
239,168

Cash equivalents

$
158,023
Short-term marketable securities

81,145

$
239,168

As of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, all of the Company’s short-term marketable securities had contractual maturities of less than one year.

5. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

The following is a summary of accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021:

September 30, 2021

December 31, 2020
Accrued external research and development expenses

$
14,148

$
8,740
Accrued employee compensation and benefits

2,218

495
Accrued legal and professional fees

191

154
Short-term lease liability and other

199

294

$
16,756

$
9,683


	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
Accrued external research and development expenses	$	15,799	$	17,539
Accrued employee compensation and benefits		1,452		554
Accrued legal and professional fees		184		124
Short-term lease liability and other		212		205
	$	17,647	$	18,422

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

6. Stockholder’s equity (deficit)

Common stock

As of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company’s certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, authorized the Company to issue 150,000,000 shares of ~~$0.0001~~$0.0001 par value common stock. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to 1 vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

holders of common stock, voting exclusively and as a separate class, have the exclusive right to vote for the election of directors of the Company. Common stockholders are entitled to receive dividends, as may be declared by the board of directors. Through ~~September 30, 2021,~~ March 31, 2022, 0 cash dividends had been declared or ~~paid~~paid..

On June 24, 2019, the Company completed its IPO at which time the Company issued 6,612,500 shares of common stock, including the exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to 862,500 additional shares of common stock, at a public offering price of ~~$16.00~~$16.00 per share. The Company received ~~$98,394,~~$98,394, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, but before deducting offering costs paid by the Company, which were ~~$2,942.~~$2,942. Upon the closing of the IPO, all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock converted into 21,056,136 shares of common stock.

On July 10, 2020, the Company completed a follow-on public offering at which time the Company issued 6,012,390 shares of common stock, including the exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to 784,224 additional shares of common stock, at a public offering price of ~~$36.00~~$36.00 per share. The Company received ~~$203,460~~$203,460 net of underwriting discounts and commissions, but before deducting offering costs paid by the Company, which were ~~$906.~~$906.

On May 18, 2021, the Company filed a Form S-3 Registration Statement and the accompanying prospectus activating ~~the at-the-market,~~an At-The-Market, or ATM, facility by entering into a sales agreement with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, relating to shares of the Company’s common stock offered. Pursuant to the terms of the sales agreement, the Company may offer and sell shares of common stock, having an aggregate price of up to ~~$100.0~~$100.0 million, from time to time. The Company reserved 5,000,000 shares of common stock related to the ATM offering. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the Company did not make any sales under the ATM facility.

As of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there were ~~34,875,302~~35,022,935 and ~~34,741,649~~34,900,727 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

~~outstanding, respectively.~~

The following shares of common stock were reserved for issuance as follows:

September 30, 2021

December 31, 2020
Options outstanding under the 2018 Stock Option and Grant Plan

2,028,496

2,148,019
Options outstanding under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

2,003,556

1,585,293
Options available for future grant

3,094,946

2,127,544
Common stock available for ATM program

5,000,000

—
2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

881,249

543,963
Total

13,008,247

6,404,819

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~


	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
Options outstanding under the 2018 Stock Option and Grant Plan		1,889,683		2,011,891
Options outstanding under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan		3,693,775		3,209,203
Options available for future grant		2,800,756		1,889,299
Common stock available for ATM program		5,000,000		5,000,000
2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan		1,221,436		872,429
		14,605,650		12,982,822

Undesignated preferred stock

The Company’s fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the Company to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value ~~$0.0001~~$0.0001 per share. There were 0 undesignated preferred shares issued or outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2021.~~

~~Restricted common stock~~

In March 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 226,400 shares of restricted common stock under restricted stock agreements with the founders. Pursuant to the terms of the agreements, the restricted common stock was initially subject to a vesting schedule over a four-year period commencing in January 2017 and culminating in January 2021. In March 2018, the Company amended the restricted stock agreements such that the restricted common stock became subject to a vesting schedule over a two-year period commencing in May 2018 and culminating in June 2020. As of September 30, 2021, all restricted stock issued to the founders is fully vested.

In April, June and July 2019, the Company amended certain option grant agreements granted under the Company’s 2018 Stock Option and Grant Plan to allow certain holders the right to early exercise specified unvested options, subject to a repurchase right held by the Company equal to the lesser of the original exercise price per share or the fair value of the shares on the repurchase date. The unvested shares issued as a result of the early exercise are deemed restricted stock pursuant to a restricted stock agreement and a vesting schedule identical to the vesting schedule of the original grant agreement. The proceeds related to unvested restricted common stock are recorded as liabilities until the stock vests, at which point they are reclassified to additional paid-in capital. Common shares issued for the early exercise of options are included in issued and outstanding shares. As of September 30, 2021, all shares issued as a result of the early exercise are fully vested.

~~The following table summarizes restricted stock activity since December~~ 31, ~~2020:~~2022.

Grant-Date Fair

Number of Shares

Value
Unvested restricted common stock as of December 31, 2020

33,614

$
0.62
Shares vesting

(33,614)

0.62
Unvested restricted common stock as of September 30, 2021

—

-

7. Stock-based awards

2018 Stock option and grant plan

The Company’s 2018 Stock Option and Grant Plan (the “2018 Plan”) provided for the Company to grant incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards and other stock-based awards to

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The 2018 Plan was administered by the board of directors or, at the discretion of the board of directors, by a committee of the board of directors. The exercise prices, vesting and other restrictions were determined at the discretion of the board of directors, or its committee if so delegated.

The total number of shares of common stock that could have been issued under the 2018 Plan was 3,071,960 shares, of which 107,635 shares remained available for grant on June 18, 2019, the date that the Company’s 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”) became effective. Upon the effectiveness of the 2019 Plan, the 107,635

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

remaining shares available under the 2018 Plan were transferred and became available for issuance under the 2019 Plan. Shares of common stock underlying outstanding awards under the 2018 Plan that are forfeited, cancelled, held back upon exercise or settlement of an award to satisfy the exercise price or tax withholding, reacquired by the Company prior to vesting, satisfied without the issuance of stock, expire or are otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) will be added to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2019 Plan.

2019 Stock option and incentive plan

The 2019 Plan was adopted and approved by the Company’s board of directors in May 2019 and by the Company’s stockholders in June 2019. The 2019 Plan became effective on June 18, 2019 and replaced the Company’s 2018 Plan on that date. The 2019 Plan allows the board of directors or the compensation committee of the board of directors to make equity-based incentive awards to the Company’s officers, employees, directors or other key persons (including consultants). The number of shares initially reserved for issuance under the 2019 Plan was 2,572,457, which included the 107,635 shares transferred from the 2018 Plan, and shall be cumulatively increased on each January 1 by 4%4% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31 or such lesser number of shares determined by the Company’s board of directors or compensation committee of the board of directors. The 2019 Plan was increased by 1,389,665 shares on January 1, 2021 and by ~~1,142,713~~1,396,029 shares on January 1, ~~2020.~~2022.

The 2019 Plan is administered by the board of directors or, at the discretion of the board of directors, by a committee of the board of directors. The exercise prices, vesting and other restrictions are determined at the discretion of the board of directors, or its committee if so delegated, except that the exercise price per share of stock options may not be less than ~~100%~~100% of the fair market value of the share of common stock on the date of grant and the term of stock option may not be greater than ten ~~years.~~years. All incentive options granted to any person possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of shares may not have an exercise price of less than ~~110%~~110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. Stock options granted to employees, officers, members of the board of directors and consultants will typically vest over a four-year period.

Shares that are expired, terminated, surrendered or canceled under the 2019 Plan without having been fully exercised will be available for future awards.

2019 Employee stock purchase plan

The 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2019 ESPP”) was adopted and approved by the Company’s board of directors in May 2019 and by the Company’s stockholders in June 2019. The 2019 ESPP became effective on June 18, 2019, at which time 273,869 shares were reserved for issuance. The 2019 ESPP provides that the number of shares reserved and available for issuance will automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2020 and each January 1 through January 1, 2029, by the least of (i) 1%1% of the outstanding number of shares of the Company’s common stock on the immediately preceding December 31, (ii) 410,803 shares or (iii) such number of shares as determined by the compensation committee. The 2019 ESPP was increased by 347,416 shares on January 1, 2021 and by ~~285,678~~349,007 shares on January 1, ~~2020.~~2022.

2018

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

Stock option valuation

The assumptions that the Company used to determine the grant-date fair value of stock options granted to employees, directors and consultants as follows, presented on a weighted average basis:


	Three Months Ended September 30,			Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2021		2020	2021		2020


								Three Months Ended March 31,
								2022			2021
Expected term (in years)	5.96		n/a	5.89		5.81			5.77			6.00
Expected volatility	70.04	%	n/a	70.34	%	77.70	%		72.69	%		70.44	%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	0.91	%	n/a	0.82	%	1.07	%		1.42	%		0.59	%
Expected dividend yield	0.00	%	n/a	0.00	%	0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%

Stock options

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity since December 31, ~~2020:~~2021:

Weighted-

Weighted-


Average

Average

Aggregate

Exercise

remaining

Intrinsic

Number

Price per

contractual

Value

of Options

Share

term (years)

(000's)
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2020

3,733,312

$
12.15

8.53

$
52,498
Options granted

422,263

$
25.71

Options exercised

(123,523)

$
5.15

Balance outstanding, September 30, 2021

4,032,052

$
13.79

7.98

$
39,854
Exercisable, September 30, 2021

1,843,127

$
10.20

7.63

$
23,444
Vested and expected to vest, September 30, 2021

4,032,052

$
13.79

7.98

$
39,854


				Weighted-		Weighted-
				Average		Average		Aggregate
				Exercise		remaining		Intrinsic
	Number			Price per		contractual		Value
	of Options			Share		term (years)		(000's)
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2021		5,221,094		$	15.49		8.20		36,168
Options granted		515,627		$	21.54
Options exercised		(122,208	)	$	1.21
Options cancelled		(31,055	)	$	22.16
Balance outstanding, March 31, 2022		5,583,458		$	16.32		8.20	$	19,714
Vested and expected to vest, March 31, 2022		4,724,536		$	15.42		7.92	$	19,714
Exercisable, March 31, 2022		2,297,235		$	11.19		7.26	$	14,723

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the fair value of the Company’s common stock for those stock options that had exercise prices lower than the fair value of the Company’s common stock.

The weighted average grant-date fair value per share of stock options granted during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 was ~~$14.45~~$13.62 and ~~$15.82,~~$16.08, respectively.

Awards with performance-based vesting conditions granted under the 2019 Plan

In December 2021, the Company granted 610,546 stock options to management at an exercise price of $21.10, which vest upon the achievement on or before December 31, 2022 of three pre-determined milestones regarding progress related to the HARMONY study, progress related to the SYMMETRY study, and progress related to availability of drug product for use in Phase 3 clinical trials. One-third of the options vest upon achievement of each of the milestones. The Company intends to begin to recognize stock compensation expense for these awards at the time that the related performance milestones are deemed probable to occur. The Company did not recognize any stock compensation expense related to these awards in 2021 or for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

In January 2022, the Company granted an additional 248,376 stock options to Company employees with the same performance-based milestones and vesting terms at exercise price of $21.70. The Company did not recognize any stock compensation expense related to these awards for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

Stock-based compensation

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock-based compensation expense during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
Classified within research and development expense	$	1,111	$	1,645
Classified within general and administrative expense		2,200		719
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	3,311	$	2,364

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2021

2020

2021

2020
Classified within research and development expense

$
770

$
378

$
2,223

$
1,115
Classified within general and administrative expense

1,842

1,168

5,189

2,991
Total stock-based compensation expense

$
2,612

$
1,546

$
7,412

$
4,106

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options was ~~$22,511, which is~~$39,717, including performance-based awards with unrecognized compensation costs of $11,284. These unvested stock options are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.0~~1.92 years.

In April, June and July 2019, certain option holders early exercised options to purchase 491,207 shares of common stock, at an average exercise price of $0.65 per share, for cash proceeds of $321 (See Note 6). Stock-based compensation expense related to these options will continue to be recognized over the requisite service period of the awards based on the grant-date fair value which was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

8. Amgen license agreement

In June 2018, the Company entered into a license agreement (the “Amgen Agreement”) with Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) pursuant to which the Company was granted an exclusive license to certain patents and intellectual property related to a long-acting FGF21 analog in order to commercially develop, manufacture, use and distribute FGF21 as a treatment for NASH and other serious metabolic diseases. The Amgen Agreement provides the Company with exclusive global rights to the licensed products and the right to grant sublicenses that cover EFX to third parties.

In exchange for these rights, the Company made an upfront payment of ~~$5,000~~$5,000 and issued 2,653,333 shares of Series A Preferred Stock with a fair value of ~~$1,353~~$1,353 to Amgen. Amgen was also entitled to maintain a ~~10%~~10% ownership interest of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, on a fully diluted and converted basis, through the second closing of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock financing. In November 2018, in connection with the second closing of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock financing, the Company issued 3,205,128 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Amgen for a total value of ~~$7,404,~~$7,404, satisfying its anti-dilution obligation under the Amgen Agreement.

Under the Amgen Agreement, the Company made a milestone payment in ~~August~~the third quarter of 2019 of ~~$2,500~~$2,500 in connection with dosing the first patient in the BALANCED study and is obligated to pay Amgen ~~$7,500~~$7,500 in connection with dosing the first patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial, up to ~~$30,000~~$30,000 in connection with marketing approvals, and aggregate milestone payments of up to ~~$75,000~~$75,000 upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones for all products licensed under the Amgen Agreement.

Under the Amgen Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay Amgen tiered royalties ranging from a low to high single-digit percentages on annual net sales of the licensed products, beginning on the first commercial sale of such licensed products in each country and expiring on a country-by-country basis on the latest of (i) the expiration of the last valid patent claim covering such licensed products in such country, (ii) the loss of regulatory exclusivity in such country, and (iii) ten years after the first commercial sale of such licensed product in such country. The royalty payments are subject to reduction under specified conditions set forth in the Amgen Agreement.

The Company is solely responsible for all development, manufacturing, and commercial activities and costs of the licensed products, including clinical studies or other tests necessary to support the use of a licensed product. The Company is also responsible for costs related to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of the licensed patent rights.

The Amgen Agreement will remain in effect until the expiration of the royalty term in all countries for all licensed products. The Amgen Agreement may be terminated by either party with at least 90 days' notice in the event of

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

material breach by the other party that remains uncured for 90 days, by either party for insolvency or bankruptcy of the other party and immediately by Amgen if the Company challenges the licensed patents. The Company may also terminate the Amgen Agreement with 90 days' written notice for discretionary reasons such as scientific, technical, regulatory or commercial issues, as defined in the Amgen Agreement.

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ the Company did ~~not~~0t record any research and development expense in connection with the Amgen Agreement.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

9. Income taxes

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ the Company did 0t record any income tax benefits for the net operating losses incurred or for the research and development tax credits generated in each period due to its uncertainty of realizing a benefit from those items. All of the Company’s operating losses since inception have been generated in the United States.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act, (the “Act”) was signed into law. The Act includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of the employer portion of certain payroll taxes, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. The Company analyzed the provisions of the Act and determined there was 0 significant impact to its income tax provision for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

On ~~December 27,~~June 29, 2020, ~~the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021” (the “CAA”~~California Assembly Bill 85 ("AB85") was signed into law. The CAA includes provisions meant to clarify and modify certain items put forth in CARES Act, while providing aid to businesses affected by the pandemic. The CAA allows deductions for expenses paid for by Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) Program, clarifies forgiveness of EIDL advances, and other business provisions. The Company analyzed the provisions of the CAA and determined there was no significant impact to its 2020 tax provision.

~~On June 29, 2020, California signed Assembly Bill 85 (“A.B. 85”), was signed into law. A.B. 85,~~AB85, which includes several tax measures, provides for a three-year suspension of the use of net operating losses for medium and large businesses and a three-year cap on the use of business incentive tax credits to offset no more than $5$5 million of tax per year. Generally, ~~A.B. 85~~AB85 suspends the use of net operating losses for taxable years 2020, 2021 and 2022 for taxpayers with taxable income of $1$1 million or more.” Since the Company is not expected to generate California source taxable income of more than $1$1 million during these periods, no material impact is anticipated at this time.

10. Net loss per share

Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders was calculated as follows:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(26,029	)	$	(15,090	)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		35,005,501			34,744,275
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.74	)	$	(0.43	)

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,


2021

2020

2021

2020
Numerator:








Net loss

$
(24,330)

$
(21,403)

$
(68,353)

$
(49,496)
Denominator:

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

34,862,116

34,002,769

34,807,439

30,381,671
Net loss per share, basic and diluted

$
(0.70)

$
(0.63)

$
(1.96)

$
(1.63)

The Company excluded 42NaN shares and ~~53,679~~9,761 shares of restricted common stock, presented on a weighted average basis, from the calculations of basic net loss per share for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively, because those shares had not vested. The Company excluded 10,865 shares and 41,938 shares of restricted common stock, presented on a weighted average basis, from the calculations of basic net loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, because those shares had not vested.

The Company’s potentially dilutive securities, which include stock options and unvested restricted common stock, have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be to reduce the net loss

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

per share. Therefore, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per share is the same. The Company excluded the following potential common shares, presented based

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

on amounts outstanding at each period end, from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

Three and nine months ended September 30,

2021

2020
Options to purchase common stock

4,032,052

3,158,642
Unvested restricted common stock

—

48,501

4,032,052

3,207,143


	Three months ended March 31,
	2022		2021
Options to purchase common stock		5,583,458		3,877,705
Unvested restricted common stock		—		18,725
		5,583,458		3,896,430

11. Commitments and contingencies

COVID-19 Pandemic

In ~~March 2020, the~~December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China and subsequently spread to other countries, including Europe and the United States, and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. ~~Efforts~~Despite progress with distribution and administration of vaccines, COVID-19 and its effects continue to ~~contain the spread of COVID-19 intensified~~evolve and countries including the United States, Europe and Asia ~~implemented severe~~continue to respond by implementing restrictions such as travel restrictions, social distancing requirements, stay-at-home orders and delayed ~~the~~ commencement of non-COVID-19-related clinical ~~trials, among other restrictions.~~trials. The Company’s financial results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 were not significantly impacted by COVID-19, however, ~~despite vaccination efforts,~~ the Company cannot at this time predict the specific extent, duration, or full impact that the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will have on its financial condition, operations, and business plans for ~~the remainder of 2021 and into~~ 2022, including the timing and enrollment of patients in its ~~ongoing and future~~planned clinical trials and other expected milestones of its product candidate.

Operating lease

In February 2020, the Company entered into a seven-year agreement to occupy 6,647 square feet of office space in South San Francisco, California. The lease commenced on July 10, 2020 when the Company took occupancy of the leased space and the lease was determined to be operating classified. Under the agreement, the Company is required to make approximately ~~$2,300~~$2,300 in total minimum payments during the term. The Company is also required to pay its proportionate share of building operating and tax costs after the first year under lease which are not included in the measurement of the lease and treated as variable lease cost and expensed when incurred.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, maturities of the Company’s operating lease liability was as follows:


2022 (remaining)	$	235
2023		321
2024		331
2025		341
2026		351
2027		208
Total future minimum lease payments		1,787
Less imputed interest		(320	)
Present value of operating lease liabilities	$	1,467

2021 (remaining)
$
77
2022

312
2023

321
2024

331
2025

341
2026 and thereafter

559
Total future minimum lease payments

1,941
Less imputed interest

(377)
Present value of operating lease liabilities
$
1,564

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the total lease liability was ~~$1,564,~~$1,467, of which ~~$1,365~~$1,255 was noncurrent and ~~$199~~$212 was short-term and classified within “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ the components of operating lease cost were as follows:


		Three Months Ended
		Three Months Ended March 31,
			2022				2021
Lease cost:	Statement of Operations Classification:
Operating lease cost	General and administrative expense	$		81		$		81
Short-term lease cost	General and administrative expense			29				—
Variable operating lease cost	General and administrative expense			12				—
Total operating lease cost		$		122		$		81

Other information:
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liability		$		77		$		75
Weighted average remaining lease term				5.3				6.3
Weighted average discount rate				7.6	%			7.6	%

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,


2021

2020

2021

2020
Lease cost:

Statement of Operations Classification:


Operating lease cost

General and administrative expense

$
81

$
73

$
243

$
186
Variable operating lease cost

General and administrative expense

—

—

—

43
Short-term lease cost

Research and development expense

—

8

—

32
Total operating lease cost

$
81

$
81

$
243

$
261

Other information:

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liability

$
76

$
18

$
226

$
135
Weighted average remaining lease term, in years

5.8

6.8

5.8

6.8
Weighted average discount rate

7.6%

7.6%

7.6%

7.6%

Research and manufacturing commitments

The Company has entered into agreements with contract research organizations and contract manufacturing organizations to provide services in connection with its nonclinical studies and clinical trials and to manufacture clinical development materials. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the Company had non-cancelable purchase commitments under these agreements totaling ~~$11,123.~~$8,120.

Indemnification agreements

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnification of varying scope and terms to vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with members of its board of directors and its executive officers that will require the Company, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is, in many cases, unlimited. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnifications. The Company is not currently aware of any indemnification claims and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in its condensed consolidated financial statements as of ~~September 30, 2021.~~

~~Table of Contents~~March 31, 2022.

~~Akero Therapeutics, Inc.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)~~

Legal proceedings

The Company is not a party to any litigation and does not have contingency reserves established for any litigation liabilities. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of the authoritative guidance that addresses accounting for contingencies. The Company expenses as incurred the costs related to such legal proceedings.

Table of Contents

Akero Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

12. Subsequent event

The Company evaluated subsequent events through ~~November 12, 2021,~~May 6, 2022, the date on which these financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, it was determined that no subsequent events occurred that require recognition or disclosure in its financial statements for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying footnotes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial statements and related notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Because of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Overview

We are a ~~cardio-metabolic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH,~~clinical-stage company dedicated to developing ~~pioneering medicines designed to restore~~transformational treatments for patients with serious metabolic ~~balance and improve overall health.~~diseases marked by high unmet medical need, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, a disease without any approved therapies. NASH is a severe form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or NAFLD, characterized by inflammation and fibrosis in the liver that can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, cancer and death. Our lead product candidate, efruxifermin, or EFX, is an analog of fibroblast growth factor 21, or FGF21, which is an endogenously expressed hormone that protects against cellular stress and regulates metabolism of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins throughout the body. ~~We conducted a~~EFX is currently being evaluated in two Phase 2a2b clinical ~~trial,~~trials in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH: the ~~BALANCED~~HARMONY study in patients with pre-cirrhotic NASH (F2-F3 fibrosis) and the SYMMETRY study in patients with cirrhotic NASH (F4 fibrosis, compensate. Based on clinical data to ~~evaluate EFX in the treatment~~date, which include substantial rates of fibrosis regression among patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH treated with EFX for only 16 weeks, we believe EFX has the potential, if approved, to be a best-in-class medicine for treating NASH.

The Phase 2b HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies build on the results of three prior randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, in which a total of 162 adult patients with ~~a main portion of this study comprised of patients~~either NASH (n=79) or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, or T2D, (n=83) were treated with ~~F1-F3 fibrosis and an expansion cohort comprised of cirrhotic NASH patients, known as Cohort C. The~~EFX for up to 16 weeks. Our Phase 2a BALANCED study showed EFX’s potential to reverse fibrosis ~~resolve NASH, improve liver~~and restore metabolic health ~~improve glycemic control and improve lipoprotein~~while maintaining a favorable cardiovascular profile. ~~We initiated a Phase 2b clinical trial, the HARMONY study, to evaluate~~Among 40 EFX ~~in the treatment of NASH~~ patients with ~~F2/F3~~F1-F3 fibrosis in February 2021 and randomized the first patient in March 2021. Preliminary results of the HARMONY study based on the primary endpoint after 24 weeks of treatment, which are expected in the third quarter of 2022, will inform dose selection for a registrational Phase 3 clinical trial. We initiated a second Phase 2b clinical trial in F4 NASH patients with compensated cirrhosis, the SYMMETRY study, in July 2021. Based on clinical data to date, we believe EFX has the potential to be a highly differentiated, best-in-class FGF21 analog and foundational NASH monotherapy.

Prior to the ongoing HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies, EFX was administered to a total of 162 patients with either NASH (n=79) or Type 2 diabetes (T2D), or with T2D (n=83) in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials for up to 16 weeks. Substantial histological improvements were observed in the BALANCED study. Of the 40 pre-cirrhotic patients (F1-F3) who ~~were treated with EFX and~~ had end-of-treatment biopsies, 48% achieved at least a one-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH ~~compared~~and 48% achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Improvements in metabolic health included significant relative reductions in liver fat (up to ~~0% for placebo. Among~~71%), significant reductions in HbA1c (up to 0.9% in patients with both NASH and T2D), and significant reductions in triglycerides (up to 45%), a key attribute given that cardiovascular disease remains the number one cause of mortality in patients with NASH. Across EFX groups, the most frequent adverse events were grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal events, which were transient in nature.

Results among a subset of 22patients from the 16-week BALANCED main study who had F2 or F3 fibrosis at baseline, as well as results from an expansion cohort of patients with cirrhosis due to NASH (F4 fibrosis, compensated), support our confidence that we expect to continue to observe histological improvements in the ongoing, longer-duration HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies. For example, among BALANCED study patients who had F2/F3 fibrosis at baseline, 68% had at least a ~~1-stage~~one-stage improvement in fibrosis, ~~while~~including 50% who had a ~~2-stage~~two-stage fibrosis improvement. ~~Among 12~~We also observed that 33% of patients with ~~compensated~~ cirrhosis ~~(F4) who were treated with EFX and had end-of-treatment biopsies, 33%~~due to NASH (F4, compensated) achieved ~~at least~~ a one-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH compared to 0% among 5 placebo patients. An additional 25% of EFX treated patients achieved NASH resolution, compared to 0% of placebo patients. As a result, a total of 7 of 12 EFX treated patients, or 58%, achieved either a one-stage improvement of fibrosis without worsening of NASH, or NASH resolution, compared with 0 of 5 placebo patients, or 0%. Each of these sets of histology results are among the most promising reported to date across all mechanisms evaluated in NASH.after just 16 weeks.

EFX treated patients in both the BALANCED main study and Cohort C achieved significant reductions in ALT of up to 51% and significant improvements in glycemic control, including improvements in HbA1c of up to 0.5%. Patients in the BALANCED main study also achieved highly significant relative reductions in liver fat of up to 72%, compared to 0% for placebo. In all three trials, T2D and NASH patients treated with EFX achieved highly significant improvements in lipoprotein profile, including reduction in triglycerides of up to 45%, a key attribute given that cardiovascular disease remains the most frequent cause of mortality in NASH patients. Data from the BALANCED study supported a successful application for Fast Track designation by FDA, which was granted in October 2021.

~~Table of Contents~~

Based on the highly consistent results across three separate clinical trials in patients with T2D ~~and~~and/or NASH, ~~patients, reflecting~~which we believe reflects the ability of EFX to uniquely reproduce the actions of native FGF21, we believe EFX holds the potential to be a highly-differentiated, best-in-class FGF21 analog and promising monotherapy for the treatment of NASH, if approved. NASH is a complex disease, and its treatment ideally would include intervening at all of the various stages of its pathogenesis. We believe EFX could potentially address all of the various stages of NASH pathogenesis in a single treatment: reversing fibrosis, resolving steatohepatitis, and helping to restore healthy metabolism to the whole body.

We were incorporated in January 2017 and have devoted substantially all of our efforts to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, in-licensing rights to EFX, research and development activities for EFX, building our intellectual property portfolio, exploring pipeline expansion opportunities, and providing general

Table of Contents

and administrative support for these operations. To date, we have principally raised capital through the issuance of convertible preferred stock and the initial public offering of our common stock in June 2019 and an underwritten public offering of our common stock in July 2020.

We have incurred significant operating losses since inception. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of EFX and any future product candidates. Our net losses were ~~$24.3~~$26.0 million and ~~$68.4~~$15.1 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~respectively, and $21.4~~respectively. Our net losses were $100.8 million and ~~$49.5~~$79.2 million for the ~~three~~years ended December 31, 2021 and ~~nine months ended September 30,~~ 2020, respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of ~~$277.9~~$336.3 million.

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses for at least the next several years as we advance EFX through later-stage clinical development, develop additional product candidates and seek regulatory approval of any product candidates that complete clinical development. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution.

We may also incur expenses in connection with the in-licensing or acquisition of additional product candidates.

As a result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the sale of equity, debt financings, or other capital sources, which may include collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to raise capital or enter into such agreements as and when needed, we may have to significantly delay, reduce or eliminate the development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates or delay our pursuit of potential in-licenses or acquisitions.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate product sales, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and be forced to reduce or terminate our operations.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of ~~$215.1~~$165.4 million, which we believe will be sufficient to fund our current operating plan into the third quarter of 2023.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

As of ~~November 2021, a novel strain of coronavirus, or~~May 2022, the ongoing COVID-19 ~~has~~pandemic continues to spread ~~globally.~~globally and evolve with emerging variants, such as Omicron, the BA.2 subvariants and other SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 have intensified and are evolving. The effects of restrictions previously implemented by the United States, Europe and Asia led to delays in the commencement of non-COVID-19-related clinical trials. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruptions to the U.S., regional and global economies and has contributed to significant volatility and negative pressure in financial markets.

We have been carefully monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on our business and have taken important steps to help ensure the safety of employees and their families and to reduce the spread of COVID-19. We have established, and maintained without interruption, a work-from-home policy for all employees. We have also maintained efficient communication with our manufacturing and supply partners as the COVID-19 situation has

~~Table of Contents~~

progressed. We have taken these precautionary steps while maintaining business continuity so that we can continue to progress our programs. Our financial results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were not significantly impacted by COVID-19, and the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially impact data collection for the main portion of the BALANCED study, which ~~has been completed.~~was completed in 2021. In addition, ~~enrollment in~~ our ~~recently initiated~~ongoing Phase 2b HARMONY trial, ~~has~~for which we completed enrollment in February 2022, and our ongoing SYMMETRY trial, for which enrollment remains open, have not been materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

~~Commercial-scale~~Our manufacturing efforts to date have progressed without any adverse impact from COVID-19. Specifically, commercial-scale manufacture of GMP drug substance, or API, for our Phase 2b ~~clinical trials~~ HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies

Table of Contents

was completed in April ~~2020 without any impact from COVID-19.~~2020. Manufacture of API for Phase 3 clinical trials was initiated on schedule in May 2021 ~~without any impact from COVID-19, with completion expected in~~and completed during the first ~~half~~quarter of 2022.Manufacture of GMP drug product for our Phase 2b ~~clinical trial~~HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies was completed in September 2020, with additional batches manufactured and completed in the third quarter of ~~2021, also without any impact from COVID-19.~~2021. Scale-up of manufacturing of a new drug product formulation and delivery device for use in Phase 3 clinical ~~tials,~~trials, which is expected to be completed in 2022, has so far proceeded without any adverse impact from COVID-19.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our industry, the healthcare system and our current and future operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the scope, severity and duration of the pandemic, the impact of new strains of the virus, the effectiveness and availability of vaccines and antiviral medications, the pace of these efforts, the actions taken to contain the pandemic or mitigate its impact, any additional preventative and protective actions that governments may direct, and the direct and indirect economic effects of the pandemic and containment measures, among others. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for a discussion of the potential adverse impact of COVID-19 on our business, results of operations and financial ~~condition~~.condition.

Components of our results of operations

Revenue

We have not generated any revenue since our inception and do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the near future, if at all. If our development efforts for EFX or additional product candidates that we may develop in the future are successful and result in marketing approval or if we enter into collaboration or license agreements with third parties, we may generate revenue in the future from a combination of product sales or payments from such collaboration or license agreements.

Operating expenses

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred in connection with the development of EFX, as well as unrelated discovery program expenses. We expense research and development costs as incurred. These expenses include:

●

•

employee-related expenses, including salaries, related benefits and stock-based compensation expense for employees engaged in research and development functions;

●

expenses incurred under agreements with CROs that are primarily engaged in the oversight and conduct of our clinical trials; CMOs that are primarily engaged to provide drug substance and product for our clinical trials, research and development programs, as well as investigative sites and consultants that conduct our clinical trials, nonclinical studies and other scientific development services;

●

~~the cost of acquiring and manufacturing nonclinical and clinical trial materials, including manufacturing registration and validation batches;~~

●

~~costs related to compliance with quality and regulatory requirements; and~~

●

~~payments made under third-party licensing agreements.~~

•

~~Table~~the cost of ~~Contents~~

acquiring and manufacturing nonclinical and clinical trial materials, including manufacturing registration and validation batches;

•

costs related to compliance with quality and regulatory requirements; and

•

payments made under third-party licensing agreements.

Advance payments that we make for goods or services to be received in the future for use in research and development activities are recorded as prepaid expenses. Such amounts are recognized as an expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, or until it is no longer expected that the goods will be delivered or the services rendered.

Product candidates in later stages of clinical development, such as EFX, generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect that our research and development expenses will increase substantially in connection with our planned clinical development activities in the near term and in the future. At this time, we cannot accurately estimate or know the nature, timing and costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the clinical development of EFX and any future product candidates.

Table of Contents

Our clinical development costs may vary significantly based on factors such as:

●

~~per patient trial costs;~~

●

~~the number of sites included in the trials;~~

●

~~the countries in which the trials are conducted;~~

●

~~the length of time required to enroll eligible patients;~~

●

~~the number of patients that participate in the trials;~~

●

~~the number of doses that patients receive;~~

●

~~the drop-out or discontinuation rates of patients enrolled in clinical trials;~~

●

~~potential additional safety monitoring requested by regulatory agencies;~~

●

~~the duration of patient participation in the trials and follow-up;~~

●

~~any setbacks or delays to the initiation or completion of preclinical or non-clinical studies, product development or clinical trials due to the COVID-19 pandemic;~~

●

~~the cost and timing of manufacturing our product candidates, including on account of any disruption or delays to the supply of our product candidates due to the COVID-19 pandemic;~~

●

~~the phase of development of our product candidates; and~~

●

~~the efficacy and safety profile of our product candidates.~~

•

per patient trial costs;

•

the number of sites included in the trials;

•

the countries in which the trials are conducted;

•

the length of time required to enroll eligible patients;

•

the number of patients that participate in the trials;

•

the number of doses that patients receive;

•

the drop-out or discontinuation rates of patients enrolled in clinical trials;

•

potential additional safety monitoring requested by regulatory agencies;

•

the duration of patient participation in the trials and follow-up;

•

any setbacks or delays to the initiation or completion of preclinical or non-clinical studies, product development or clinical trials due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

•

the cost and timing of manufacturing our product candidates, including on account of any disruption or delays to the supply of our product candidates due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

•

the phase of development of our product candidates; and

•

the efficacy and safety profile of our product candidates.

The successful development and commercialization of product candidates is highly uncertain. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development and commercialization, including the following:

●

•

the timing and progress of nonclinical and clinical development activities;

●

~~the number and scope of nonclinical and clinical programs we decide to pursue;~~

●

~~the ability to raise necessary additional funds;~~

●

~~the progress of the development efforts of parties with whom we may enter into collaboration arrangements;~~

●

~~our ability to maintain our current development program and to establish new ones;~~

●

~~our ability to establish new licensing or collaboration arrangements;~~

●

~~the successful initiation and completion of clinical trials with safety, tolerability and efficacy profiles that are satisfactory to the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority;~~

●

~~the receipt and related terms of regulatory approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;~~

●

~~the availability of drug substance, drug product, and delivery devices utilized in the production of our product candidate;~~

●

~~establishing and maintaining agreements with third-party manufacturers for clinical supply for our clinical trials and commercial manufacturing, if our product candidate is approved;~~

●

~~our ability to obtain and maintain patents, trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity, both in the United States and internationally;~~

●

~~our ability to protect our rights in our intellectual property portfolio;~~

●

~~the commercialization of our product candidate, if and when approved;~~

●

~~obtaining and maintaining third-party insurance coverage and adequate reimbursement;~~

•

the number and scope of nonclinical and clinical programs we decide to pursue;

•

the ability to raise necessary additional funds;

~~Table~~•

the progress of ~~Contents~~

the development efforts of parties with whom we may enter into collaboration arrangements;

●

~~the acceptance of our product candidate, if approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;~~

●

~~competition with other products;~~

●

the impacts of a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease, including COVID-19, on the supply of our product candidate and ability to successfully initiate and complete preclinical and non-clinical studies and clinical trials, to receive regulatory approval for our product candidate and to commercialize our product candidate, if approved; and

●

~~a continued acceptable safety profile of our therapy following approval~~.

•

our ability to maintain our current development program and to establish new ones;

•

our ability to establish new licensing or collaboration arrangements;

•

the successful initiation and completion of clinical trials with safety, tolerability and efficacy profiles that are satisfactory to the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority;

•

the receipt and related terms of regulatory approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

•

the availability of drug substance, drug product, and delivery devices utilized in the production of our product candidate;

•

establishing and maintaining agreements with third-party manufacturers for clinical supply for our clinical trials and commercial manufacturing, if our product candidate is approved;

•

our ability to obtain and maintain patents, trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity, both in the United States and internationally;

•

our ability to protect our rights in our intellectual property portfolio;

•

the commercialization of our product candidate, if and when approved;

•

obtaining and maintaining third-party insurance coverage and adequate reimbursement;

•

the acceptance of our product candidate, if approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;

•

competition with other products;

•

a continued acceptable safety profile of our therapy following approval.

A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of our product candidates could significantly change the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.

Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs for personnel in executive, finance, corporate and business development, and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include legal fees relating to patent and corporate matters; professional fees for accounting, auditing, tax and administrative consulting services; insurance costs; administrative travel expenses; marketing expenses and other operating costs.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our headcount to support development of EFX and our continued research activities. We also anticipate that we will incur increased accounting, audit, legal, tax, regulatory, compliance, and director and officer insurance costs, as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with maintaining compliance with exchange listing and SEC requirements.

Other income

Other income consists primarily of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities.

Results of operations

Comparison of the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:

Three Months Ended

September 30,


2021

2020

$ Change

% Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

Operating expenses:









Research and development

$
19,470

$
17,379

$
2,091

12
%
General and administrative

4,883

4,159

724

17
%
Total operating expenses

24,353

21,538

2,815

13
%
Loss from operations

(24,353)

(21,538)

(2,815)

13
%
Other income, net

23

135

(112)

(83)
%
Net loss

$
(24,330)

$
(21,403)

$
(2,927)

14
%

~~Table of Contents~~


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2022			2021			$ Change			% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	20,514		$	10,602		$	9,912			93		%
General and administrative		5,537			4,526			1,011			22		%
Total operating expenses		26,051			15,128			10,923			72		%
Loss from operations		(26,051	)		(15,128	)		(10,923	)		72		%
Other income		22			38			(16	)		(42	)	%
Net loss	$	(26,029	)	$	(15,090	)	$	(10,939	)		72		%

Research and development expenses

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:

Three Months Ended

September 30,


2021

2020

$ Change

% Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

Research and development expenses:









Direct EFX program expenses

$
16,883

$
16,212

$
671

4
%
Personnel and related costs

2,587

1,167

1,420

122
%
Total research and development expenses

$
19,470

$
17,379

$
2,091

12
%


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2022		2021		$ Change		% Change
	(in thousands, except percentages)
Research and development expenses:
Direct EFX program expenses	$	17,494	$	8,691	$	8,803		101	%
Personnel and related costs		3,020		1,911		1,109		58	%
Total research and development expenses	$	20,514	$	10,602	$	9,912		93	%

Research and development expenses were ~~$19.5~~$20.5 million and ~~$17.4~~$10.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively, an increase of ~~$2.1 million, or 12%.~~$9.9 million. Direct costs for our EFX program increased ~~$0.7~~$8.8 million, attributed primarily to a ~~$4.3~~$5.6 million increase in CRO expenses related to our ongoing HARMONY and SYMMETRY clinical trials ~~offset by~~and a ~~$3.6~~$3.3 million ~~decrease due to the timing of~~increase in third-party contract manufacturing expenses for EFX. Personnel and related costs increased ~~$1.4~~$1.1 million, due to a ~~$0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and a $1.0~~$0.7 million increase in wage and wage-related expenses ~~resulting from increased staff.~~and a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation. We expect that our research and development expenses will increase substantially

Table of Contents

in connection with our planned manufacturing and clinical development activities in the near term and in the future to support the ongoing programs.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were ~~$4.9~~$5.5 million and ~~$4.2~~$4.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively, an increase of ~~$0.7~~$1.0 million ~~or 17%~~ which was due primarily to ~~increased~~a $0.6 million increase in stock-based compensation ~~expense.~~and a $0.3 increase in wage and wage-related expenses resulting from increased staff.

Other income

Other income for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 is comprised primarily of less than $0.1 million of interest income from our cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities compared to less than $0.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. This decrease is related to ~~lower market interest rates available~~decrease in the amounts invested on our investment funds.

~~Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020~~

~~The following table summarizes our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:~~

Nine Months Ended

September 30,


2021

2020

$ Change

% Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

Operating expenses:

Research and development

$
54,048

$
39,207

$
14,841

38
%
General and administrative

14,399

11,164

3,235

29
%
Total operating expenses

68,447

50,371

18,076

36
%
Loss from operations

(68,447)

(50,371)

(18,076)

36
%
Other income, net

94

875

(781)

(89)
%
Net loss

$
(68,353)

$
(49,496)

$
(18,857)

38
%

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Research and development expenses~~

~~The following table summarizes our research and development expenses incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:~~

Nine Months Ended

September 30,


2021

2020

$ Change

% Change

(in thousands, except percentages)

Research and development expenses:

Direct EFX program expenses

$
47,179

$
35,904

$
11,275

31
%
Personnel and related costs

6,869

3,303

3,566

108
%
Total research and development expenses

$
54,048

$
39,207

$
14,841

38
%

Research and development expenses were $54.0 million and $39.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, an increase of $14.8 million, or 38%. Direct costs for our EFX program increased $11.3 million, attributed primarily to an $8.8 million increase in CRO expenses related to our ongoing HARMONY and SYMMETRY clinical trials and a $2.8 million increase in third-party contract manufacturing expenses for EFX, offset partially by a decrease of $0.4 million for non-clinical research expenses. Personnel and related costs increased $3.6 million, due to a $1.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and a $2.5 million increase in wage and wage-related expenses resulting from increased staff. We expect that our research and development expenses will increase substantially in connection with our planned manufacturing and clinical development activities in the near term and in the future to support the ongoing programs.

~~General and administrative expenses~~

General and administrative expenses were $14.4 million and $11.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, an increase of $3.2 million, or 29% which was due primarily to a $2.2 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and a $0.9 million increase in wage and wage-related expenses resulting from increased staff.

~~Other income~~

Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 is comprised primarily of $0.1 million of interest income from our cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities compared to $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. This decrease is related to lower market interest rates available on our investment funds.

Liquidity and capital resources

From our inception through ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we have incurred significant operating losses. We have not yet commercialized any products and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of products for several years, if at all. To date, we have funded our operations primarily with proceeds from the sale of our redeemable convertible preferred stock, the initial public offering of our common stock in June 2019 and a follow-on public offering of our common stock in July 2020. Through ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had received gross proceeds totaling $412.7 million from sales of our redeemable convertible preferred stock in 2017 and 2018, the initial public offering of our common stock in June 2019 and the follow-on public offering of our common stock in July 2020. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of ~~$215.1~~$165.4 million. We have invested our cash resources primarily in liquid money market accounts, commercial paper and corporate debt securities.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

2021

2020

(in thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities

$
(52,986)

$
(47,409)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

30,280

(27,660)
Net cash provided by financing activities

359

203,048
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

$
(22,347)

$
127,979


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2022			2021
	(in thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(22,876	)	$	(18,346	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		22,750			19,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		132			24
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	6		$	678

Cash flows from operating activities

Cash used in operating activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 was ~~$53.0~~$22.9 million, consisting of a net loss of ~~$68.4 million which was partially offset by non-cash charges of $8.2~~$26.0 million and changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $7.2 million. The non-cash charges are primarily related to $7.4 million of stock-based compensation expense. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to increases of $3.2 million in prepaid expenses and other assets, $3.5 million in accounts payable and $7.1 million in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, all of which are related to the timing of payments and prepayments to our CROs and CMOs for ongoing clinical trial and manufacturing activities.

~~Cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $47.4 million, consisting of a net loss of $49.5 million and changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $2.1~~$0.3 million, offset by non-cash charges of ~~$4.2~~$3.5 million, ~~for~~consisting primarily of stock-based compensation expense. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to the timing of prepayments and payments to our CMOs and CROs.

Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was $18.3 million, consisting of a net loss of $15.1 million and changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $5.8 million, offset by non-cash charges of $2.5 million, consisting primarily of stock-based compensation expense. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to the timing of prepayments and payments to our CMOs and CROs.

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash provided by investing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 was ~~$30.3 million consisting of $73.8~~$22.8 million from the maturities of short-term marketable ~~securities offset~~securities.

Table of Contents

Cash provided by ~~$43.6~~investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was $19.0 million ~~in purchases~~from the maturities of short-term marketable securities.

Cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $27.7 million, consisting of $78.5 million from the sales and maturities of short-term marketable securities offset by $106.0 million in purchases of short-term marketable securities.

Cash flows from financing activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 was ~~$0.4~~$0.1 million from the exercise of stock ~~options and the issuance of employee stock purchase shares~~options..

Cash provided by financing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2020~~March 31, 2021 was ~~$203.0~~less than $0.1 million ~~consisting of $202.6 million of follow-on public offering proceeds, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and offering costs, and $0.4 million in proceeds~~ from the exercise of stock ~~options and the issuance of employee stock purchase plan shares.~~options.

Funding requirements

Our primary uses of capital are, and we expect will continue to be, research and development services, compensation and related expenses and general overhead costs. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. In addition, since the closing of our IPO, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. We anticipate that our expenses will

~~Table of Contents~~

increase significantly in connection with our ongoing activities. The timing and amount of our operating expenditures will depend largely on:

●

~~the initiation, progress, timing, costs and results of nonclinical studies and clinical trials for EFX or any future product candidates we may develop;~~

●

timing delays, if any, with respect to preclinical and clinical development of EFX or any future product candidates we may develop as a result of a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease, including COVID-19;

●

~~our ability to maintain our license to EFX from Amgen;~~

●

the outcome, timing and cost of seeking and obtaining regulatory approvals from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, including the potential for such authorities to require that we perform more nonclinical studies or clinical trials than those that we currently expect or change their requirements on studies or trials that had previously been agreed to;

●

the cost to establish, maintain, expand, enforce and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio, including the amount and timing of any payments we may be required to make, or that we may receive, in connection with licensing, preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patents or other intellectual property rights;

●

~~the effect of competing technological and market developments;~~

●

~~market acceptance of any approved product candidate, including product pricing, as well as product coverage and the adequacy of reimbursement by third-party payors;~~

●

~~the cost of acquiring, licensing or investing in additional businesses, products, product candidates and technologies;~~

●

~~the cost and timing of selecting, auditing and potentially validating a manufacturing site for commercial scale manufacturing;~~

●

~~the cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for any product candidates for which we may receive regulatory approval and that we determine to commercialize; and~~

●

~~our need to implement additional internal systems and infrastructure, including financial and reporting systems.~~

•

the initiation, progress, timing, costs and results of nonclinical studies and clinical trials for EFX or any future product candidates we may develop;

•

our ability to maintain our license to EFX from Amgen;

•

the effect of competing technological and market developments;

•

market acceptance of any approved product candidate, including product pricing, as well as product coverage and the adequacy of reimbursement by third-party payors;

•

the cost of acquiring, licensing or investing in additional businesses, products, product candidates and technologies;

•

the cost and timing of selecting, auditing and potentially validating a manufacturing site for commercial scale manufacturing;

•

the cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for any product candidates for which we may receive regulatory approval and that we determine to commercialize; and

•

our need to implement additional internal systems and infrastructure, including financial and reporting systems.

We expect that we will require additional funding to complete the clinical development of EFX, commercialize EFX, if we receive regulatory approval, and pursue in-licenses or acquisitions of other product candidates. If we receive regulatory approval for EFX or other product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution, depending on ~~where~~whether we choose to commercialize EFX ourselves.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, ownership interest may be materially diluted, and the terms of such securities could include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing and

Table of Contents

preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants that limit our ability to take specified actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development or future commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Contractual obligations and other commitments

WeDuring the three months ended March 31, 2022, there have ~~entered into agreements with CROs and CMOs to provide services in connection with our nonclinical studies and clinical trials and to manufacture clinical development materials. Apart from~~been no material changes outside the ~~contracts with non-cancelable purchase commitments, we have entered into other contracts in the normal~~ordinary course of business ~~with certain~~

~~Table~~to our contractual obligations and commitments from those disclosed in Management's Discussion and Analysis of ~~Contents~~

~~CROs, CMOs,~~Financial Condition and Results of Operations, set forth in Part II, Item 7, of our Fiscal 2021 Form 10-K other ~~third parties for nonclinical research studies~~than our non-cancelable purchase arrangements.

Non-cancelable purchase arrangements increased to $9.9 million as of March 31, 2022, compared to $9.3 million as of December 31, 2021. The increase of $0.6 million was primarily attributable to $0.7 million increase in the purchase obligations to support the growth and ~~testing,~~expansion of our clinical trials ~~and manufacturing services. These contracts do not contain any minimum purchase commitments and are cancelable~~activities partially offset by ~~us upon prior notice. Payments due upon cancellation consist only of payments~~a $0.1 million decrease in operating lease obligations for ~~services provided and expenses incurred, including non-cancelable obligations of our service providers, up to~~ the ~~date of cancellation.~~

~~The following table represents our non-cancelable contractual obligations aggregated by type (in thousands):~~

Payments due by period as of




Less than 1

1 to 3

3 to 5

More than 5

Total

year

years

years

years

(in thousands)
Operating lease obligations¹

$
1,941

$
309

$
647

$
687

$
298
Purchase obligations²

11,123

11,123

—

—

—
Total non-cancelable contractual obligations

$
13,064

$
11,432

$
647

$
687

$
298

office space in South San Francisco, California.

¹See Note 11. Commitments and contingencies of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

²Purchase obligations represent management’s estimate of the future liability that would occur if agreements with CROs and CMOs were prematurely cancelled. We do not intend to prematurely cancel any agreements that we are currently party to.

Under the Amgen Agreement, we are obligated to pay Amgen $7.5 million in connection with dosing the first patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial, up to $30.0 million in connection with marketing approvals, and aggregate milestone payments of up to $75.0 million upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones for all products licensed under the agreement. Commencing on the first commercial sale of licensed products, we are obligated to pay tiered royalties on escalating tiers of annual net sales of licensed products ranging from low to high single-digit percentages. The amount and timing of any contingent payment obligations to Amgen are not currently known. The first clinical milestone, in the amount of $2.5 million, was paid to Amgen in July 2019.

Critical accounting policies and ~~significant judgments and~~ estimates

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and related disclosures. Our critical accounting policies are described under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~March 16, 2021.~~February 25, 2022. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies through ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 from those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

~~Off-balance sheet arrangements~~

~~We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.~~

Recent accounting pronouncements

See Note 2 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1, “Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our business.

~~Emerging Growth Company Status~~

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS Act), and are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to

~~Table of Contents~~

other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company may take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933 for complying with new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that we can elect to opt out of the extended transition period at any time, which election is irrevocable. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption from complying with new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

As an emerging growth company, we intend to rely upon other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements under the JOBS Act, including without limitation (i) providing an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and (ii) complying with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the consolidated financial statements, known as the auditor discussion and analysis. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more; (b) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the completion of our initial public offering; (c) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; or (d) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the SEC.

On the last business day of our second quarter in 2021, the aggregate market value of our shares held by non-affiliate stockholders exceeded $700 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2021, we will be considered a large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, and we will cease to be an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. We will no longer be exempt from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and our independent registered public accounting firm will evaluate and report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Company will also no longer be permitted to take advantage of reduced reporting requirements for smaller reporting companies.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

~~Information required by this Item~~Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. We had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $165.4 million as of March 31, 2022, which consisted primarily of money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities and corporate debt securities, largely composed of investment grade, short to intermediate term fixed income securities.

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve capital to fund our operations. We also seek to maximize income from our investments without assuming significant risk. To achieve our objectives, we maintain a portfolio of investments in a variety of securities of high credit quality and short-term duration, according to our board-approved investment policy. Our investments are subject to interest rate risk and could fall in value if market interest rates increase. A hypothetical 10% relative change in interest rates during any of the periods presented would not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Risk

The majority of our transactions occur in U.S. dollars. However, we do have certain transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro and British Pound, and we therefore are subject to foreign exchange risk. The fluctuation in the value of the U.S. dollar against other currencies affects the reported amounts of expenses, assets and liabilities primarily associated with a limited number of manufacturing activities. The effect of a hypothetical 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates applicable asto our business would not have had a material impact on our historical condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2022. As the impact of foreign currency exchange rates has not been material to our historical operating results, we ~~are electing scaled disclosure requirements available~~have not entered into derivative or hedging transactions.

Inflation Risk

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business. However, if our costs, in particular costs related to ~~Smaller~~ ~~Reporting Companies with respect~~manufacture and supply were to ~~this Item~~become subject to significant inflationary pressures, it may adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition..

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

~~The Company has established~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer (our Chief Executive Officer) and our principal financial officer (our Chief Financial Officer), have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange ~~Act)~~Act as of March 31, 2022. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to ~~be disclosed~~disclose in ~~the~~ reports that ~~the Company files~~we file or ~~submits~~submit under the ~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or~~ Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in ~~the SEC’s~~SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including ~~the~~our principal executive officer (our Chief Executive Officer) and our principal financial officer (our Chief Financial Officer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Management recognizes that anyAny controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control ~~objectives~~objective and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. ~~Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.~~

Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief

~~Table of Contents~~

Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of March 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures ~~(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act)~~ were effective at the reasonable assurance ~~level as of September 30, 2021.~~level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

All control systems have inherent limitations including the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a ~~result~~simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the ~~COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, all~~controls. Because of ~~our employees began working remotely and continue to do so. We have~~such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not ~~identified any material changes in our~~be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial ~~reporting as a result~~reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of ~~these changes to~~ the ~~working environment, in part because our internal control over~~ financial reporting ~~was designed~~process. Therefore, it is possible to ~~operate in a remote working environment. We are continually monitoring and assessing~~design into the ~~COVID-19 situation~~process safeguards to ~~determine any potential impacts on the design and operating effectiveness~~reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Table of ~~our internal controls over financial reporting~~Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may be involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, consisting of intellectual property, commercial, employment and other matters which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of any such proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, as of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we were not party to any legal proceedings that we would expect to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In evaluating the Company and our business, careful consideration should be given to the following risk factors, in addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other documents that we file with the SEC. Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. If any of the following risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could be materially and adversely affected. The risks described below are not intended to be exhaustive and are not the only risks facing the Company. New risk factors can emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict the impact that any factor or combination of factors may have on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

Risks Related to the Clinical Development and Manufacturing of our Product Candidate

Risks Related to Clinical Development

Enrollment and retention of patients in clinical trials is an expensive and time-consuming process and could be made more difficult or rendered impossible by multiple factors outside our control, including difficulties in identifying patients with NASH, ~~and~~ significant competition for recruiting such patients in clinical ~~trials.~~trials, and restrictions on patients and investigators related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials is critical to our success. We may encounter delays in enrolling or be unable to retain a sufficient number of patients to complete the ongoing Phase 2b SYMMETRY study, or be unable to retain a sufficient number of patients to successfully complete the ongoing Phase 2b HARMONY ~~and SYMMETRY studies,~~study, and may encounter delays in enrolling or be unable to enroll or retain a sufficient number of patients in any of our future clinical trials. In particular, as a result of the inherent difficulties in diagnosing NASH and the significant competition for recruiting patients with NASH in clinical trials, there may be delays in enrolling the patients we need to complete clinical trials on a timely basis, or at all. This risk may be more significant for us than other companies conducting clinical trials for the treatment of patients with NASH because we are enrolling only patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of NASH in the ~~HARMONY and~~ SYMMETRY ~~studies~~study and subsequent clinical trials. Further, if patients are unwilling to enroll in our clinical trials because of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions on travel or healthcare institution policies or other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidate may be delayed.

~~Table of Contents~~

Factors that may generally affect patient enrollment include:

●

~~the size and nature of the patient population;~~

●

~~the number and location of clinical sites we enroll;~~

●

~~the ability of our clinical sites to maintain adequate personnel;~~

●

~~competition with other companies for clinical sites or patients;~~

●

~~the eligibility and exclusion criteria for the trial;~~

●

~~the design of the clinical trial;~~

●

~~inability to obtain and maintain patient consents;~~

●

~~risk that enrolled participants will drop out before completion; and~~

●

competing clinical trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to other available therapies, including any new drugs that may be approved for the indications we are investigating.

•

the size and nature of the patient population;

•

the number and location of clinical sites we enroll;

•

the ability of our clinical sites to maintain adequate personnel;

•

competition with other companies for clinical sites or patients;

•

the eligibility and exclusion criteria for the trial;

•

the design of the clinical trial;

•

inability to obtain and maintain patient consents;

•

risk that enrolled participants will drop out before completion; and

•

Table of Contents

In addition, if any significant adverse events or other side effects are observed in any of our future clinical trials, it may make it more difficult for us to recruit patients to our clinical trials and patients may drop out of our trials, or we may be required to abandon the trials or our development efforts of one or more product candidates altogether. Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials could result in significant delays, which would increase our costs and have an adverse effect on our company.

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than us.

The biotechnology industry is intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our competitors include multinational pharmaceutical companies, specialized biotechnology companies and universities and other research institutions. We understand that a number of pharmaceutical companies, including AbbVie, Inc., AstraZeneca PLC/MedImmune LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., Eisai, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc., Roche Holding AG, Sanofi and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, as well as large and small biotechnology companies such as Albireo Pharma, Inc., Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Altimmune, Inc., Amgen, Inc., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Axcella Health, Inc., Boston Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cirius Therapeutics, Inc., CohBar, Inc., CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc., 89bio, D&D Pharmatech, Inc., Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Galectin Therapeutics Inc., Galmed Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Inventiva Pharma SA, Ionics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., MediciNova, Inc., North Sea Pharmaceuticals, Poxel SA, Sagimet Biosciences, Inc., Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. are or may be pursuing the development or marketing of pharmaceuticals that target NASH. It is also probable that the number of companies seeking to develop products and therapies for the treatment of serious metabolic diseases, such as NASH, will increase. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do and may be better equipped to develop, manufacture and market technologically superior products. In addition, many of these competitors have significantly greater experience than we have in undertaking nonclinical studies and human clinical trials of new pharmaceutical products and in obtaining regulatory approvals of human therapeutic products. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approval for superior products. In addition, many competitors have greater name recognition and more extensive collaborative relationships.

Smaller and earlier-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large, established companies.

Our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products more rapidly than we do or may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidate or any future product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are more effective, more convenient, more widely used and less costly or have a better safety profile than our products and these competitors may also be more successful than we are in manufacturing and marketing their products. If we are unable to compete effectively against

~~Table of Contents~~

these companies, then we may not be able to commercialize our product candidate or any future product candidates or achieve a competitive position in the market. This would adversely affect our ability to generate revenue. Our competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and commercial personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

We do not know whether the HARMONY study or the SYMMETRY study will be completed or any future clinical trials will begin or be completed on schedule, if at all, as the commencement and completion of clinical trials can be delayed or prevented for a number of reasons, including, among others:

●

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not authorize us or our investigators to commence our planned clinical trials or any other clinical trials we may initiate, or may suspend our clinical trials, for example, through imposition of a clinical hold, and may request additional data to permit allowance of our investigational new drug, or IND;

●

~~delays in filing or receiving allowance of additional IND applications that may be required;~~

●

~~lack of adequate funding to continue our clinical trials and nonclinical studies;~~

●

~~negative results from our ongoing nonclinical studies;~~

●

delays in reaching or failing to reach agreement on acceptable terms with prospective clinical research organizations, or CROs, and clinical study sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and study sites;

●

~~inadequate quantity or quality of a product candidate or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials, for example delays in the manufacturing of sufficient supply of finished drug product;~~

●

~~difficulties obtaining ethics committee or Institutional Review Board, or IRB, approval to conduct a clinical study at a prospective site or sites;~~

●

challenges in recruiting and enrolling subjects to participate in clinical trials, the proximity of subjects to study sites, eligibility criteria for the clinical study, the nature of the clinical study protocol, the availability of approved effective treatments for the relevant disease, and competition from other clinical study programs for similar indications;

●

~~severe or unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by subjects in a clinical trial;~~

●

~~we may decide, or regulatory authorities may require us, to conduct additional nonclinical or clinical trials or abandon product development programs;~~

●

~~delays in validating, or inability to validate, any endpoints utilized in a clinical trial;~~

●

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our clinical study design and our interpretation of data from clinical trials, or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical trials;

●

difficulties retaining subjects who have enrolled in a clinical trial but may be prone to withdrawal due to rigors of the clinical trials, lack of efficacy, side effects, personal issues, or loss of interest; and

●

~~the impact of COVID-19 on the initiation or completion of clinical trials or the reporting of results of our clinical trials and the supply of our product candidate.~~

•

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not authorize us or our investigators to commence our planned clinical trials or any other clinical trials we may initiate, or may suspend our

Table of Contents

clinical trials, for example, through imposition of a clinical hold, and may request additional data to permit allowance of our investigational new drug, or IND;

•

delays in filing or receiving allowance of additional IND applications that may be required;

•

lack of adequate funding to continue our clinical trials and nonclinical studies;

•

negative results from our ongoing nonclinical studies;

•

inadequate quantity or quality of a product candidate or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials, for example delays in the manufacturing of sufficient supply of finished drug product;

•

difficulties obtaining ethics committee or Institutional Review Board, or IRB, approval to conduct a clinical study at a prospective site or sites;

•

severe or unexpected drug-related side effects experienced by subjects in a clinical trial;

•

we may decide, or regulatory authorities may require us, to conduct additional nonclinical or clinical trials or abandon product development programs;

•

delays in validating, or inability to validate, any endpoints utilized in a clinical trial;

•

the impact of COVID-19 on the initiation or completion of clinical trials or the reporting of results of our clinical trials and the supply of our product candidate.

Clinical trials may also be delayed or terminated as a result of ambiguous or negative interim results. In addition, a clinical study may be suspended or terminated by us, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the IRBs at the sites where the IRBs are overseeing a clinical study, a data and safety monitoring board, or DSMB, overseeing the clinical study at issue or other regulatory authorities due to a number of factors, including, among ~~others;~~others:

●

•

failure to conduct the clinical study in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols;

●

inspection of the clinical study operations or study sites by the FDA or other regulatory authorities that reveals deficiencies or violations that require us to undertake corrective action, including in response to the imposition of a clinical hold;

•

~~Table~~unforeseen safety issues or safety signals, including any that could be identified in our ongoing nonclinical studies or clinical trials, adverse side effects or lack of ~~Contents~~

effectiveness;

●

~~unforeseen safety issues or safety signals, including any that could be identified in our ongoing nonclinical studies or clinical trials, adverse side effects or lack of effectiveness;~~

●

~~changes in government regulations or administrative actions;~~

●

~~problems with clinical supply materials; and~~

●

~~lack of adequate funding to continue clinical trials.~~

•

changes in government regulations or administrative actions;

•

problems with clinical supply materials; and

•

lack of adequate funding to continue clinical trials.

Any inability to successfully complete nonclinical and clinical development could result in additional costs to us or impair our ability to generate revenue. In addition, if we make changes to a product candidate, such as developing the lyophilized formulation that we plan to employ, we may need to conduct additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials to bridge or demonstrate the comparability of our modified product candidate to earlier versions, which could delay our clinical development plan or marketing approval for our current product candidate and any future product candidates. Clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Clinical development is uncertain and our clinical trials for EFX and any future product candidates may experience delays, which would adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approvals or commercialize these programs on a timely basis or at all, which would have an adverse effect on our business.

We cannot be sure that we will be able to continue development of EFX or submit INDs or similar applications for any future product candidates, on the timelines we expect, if at all. To proceed with our development plans and ultimately commercialization, we may need to conduct and meet regulatory requirements for additional preclinical studies and clinical trials. We cannot be certain of the timely completion or outcomes of our preclinical testing and studies and cannot predict if the FDA or other regulatory authorities will accept our proposed clinical programs or if the outcomes of our preclinical studies and clinical trials will enable any future clinical trials to begin under a proposed protocol.

We depend and will continue to depend upon third parties, including independent investigators, to conduct our clinical trials under agreements with universities, medical institutions, CROs, strategic partners and others. We expect to have to negotiate budgets and contracts with CROs and trial sites, which may result in delays to our development timelines and increased costs.

We rely heavily on third parties over the course of our clinical trials, and, as a result, have limited control over the clinical investigators and limited visibility into their day-to-day activities, including with respect to their compliance with the approved clinical protocol. Nevertheless, our reliance on third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities and we are responsible for ensuring that each of our trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards. We and these third parties are required to comply with good clinical practice, or GCP, requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for product candidates in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, clinical investigators and trial sites. If we or any of these third parties fail to comply with applicable GCP requirements, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to suspend or terminate these trials or perform additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot be certain that, upon inspection, regulatory authorities will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with the GCP requirements. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with products produced under current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, requirements and may require a large number of patients. Our failure or any failure by these third parties to comply with these applicable regulations or to recruit a sufficient number of patients may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process. Moreover, our business may

~~Table of Contents~~

be implicated if any of these third parties violates federal or state fraud and abuse or false claims laws and regulations or healthcare privacy and security laws.

The third parties who conduct our ~~future~~ clinical trials are not our employees and, except for remedies that may be available to us under our agreements with those third parties, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing nonclinical and clinical programs. These third parties may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials or other product development activities, which could affect their performance on our behalf. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, such as due to the impacts of COVID-19, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to complete development of, obtain regulatory approval of or successfully commercialize our product candidates in a timely manner or at all. As a result, our financial results and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.

If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs or others terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or other third parties or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional CROs involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural

Table of Contents

transition period when a new CRO begins work. As a result, delays may occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines due to the impact of COVID-19 or for other reasons or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure (including by clinical sites or investigators) to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase substantially and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed significantly.

Risks Related to the Manufacturing of our Product Candidate

We are subject to many manufacturing risks, any of which could substantially increase our costs, delay clinical programs and limit supply of our products.

We have contracted with a third-party manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals GmbH, to make EFX drug substance (active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API) to supply the HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies, and future clinical trials and for commercial sale, if approved. We have successfully manufactured API under GMP conditions, which has been released for clinical use. ~~The~~Similarly we have contracted with Vetter Pharma International GmbH, or Vetter, to manufacture EFX drug product, or DP, for clinical development and plan to enter into a future agreement for commercial supply at the appropriate time. Even though the GMP DP being used for our ongoing HARMONY study is similar to the DP that was used for the BALANCED study, which is stored as a frozen liquid until immediately before administration to trial subjects, the process of manufacturing our product is complex, highly regulated and subject to several risks, including:

●

•

the manufacturing process is susceptible to product loss due to contamination by adventitious microorganisms, equipment failure, improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error and improper storage conditions. Even minor deviations from normal manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields and quality as well as other supply disruptions. If microbial, viral, including COVID-19, or other contaminations are discovered in our products or in the manufacturing facilities in which our products are made, the manufacturing facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and eliminate the contamination;

●

the manufacturing facilities in which our products are made could be adversely affected by equipment failures, labor and raw material shortages, pandemics, epidemics, or outbreaks of infectious disease, financial difficulties of our contract manufacturers, natural disasters, power failures, local political unrest and numerous other factors; and

•

~~Table~~any adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations for our products may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, product withdrawals or recalls or other interruptions in the supply of ~~Contents~~

our products. We may also have to record inventory write-offs and incur other charges and expenses for products that fail to meet specifications, undertake costly remediation efforts or seek more expensive manufacturing alternatives.

●

any adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations for our products may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, product withdrawals or recalls or other interruptions in the supply of our products. We may also have to record inventory write-offs and incur other charges and expenses for products that fail to meet specifications, undertake costly remediation efforts or seek more expensive manufacturing alternatives.

The manufacture of EFX requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and in-process controls. Manufacturers of these products sometimes encounter difficulties in production, especially during scale-up from the manufacturing process used for early clinical trials to a validated and qualified process needed for pivotal clinical trials and commercial launch. These problems include failure to meet target production costs and yields, failure to meet product release specifications, including stability of the product, quality assurance system failures, operator error and shortages of qualified personnel, as well as compliance with strictly enforced federal, state and foreign regulations. We cannot assure you that any product quality issues relating to the manufacture of our product candidate or any future product candidates will not occur in the future.

We do not have, and we do not currently plan to acquire or build the facilities or internal capabilities to manufacture bulk drug substance, finished drug product or delivery device for use in clinical trials or commercialization.

Table of Contents

To a large extent, that makes us dependent on the goodwill of our contract manufacturing partners to quickly fix deviations that will inevitably occur during the manufacturing of our product. Any delay or interruption in the supply of clinical trial materials, including on account of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our contract manufacturing partners, could delay the completion of clinical trials, increase the costs associated with maintaining clinical trial programs and, depending upon the period of delay, require us to commence new clinical trials at additional expense or terminate clinical trials altogether. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, three vaccines for COVID-19 have received Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA and ~~one~~two of those later received marketing approval. Additional vaccines may be authorized or approved in the future. The resultant demand for vaccines and potential for manufacturing facilities and materials to be commandeered under the Defense Production Act of 1950, or equivalent foreign legislation, may make it more difficult to obtain materials or manufacturing slots for the products needed for our clinical trials, which could lead to delays in these trials.

We have developed a new ~~freeze-dried, or~~ lyophilized, drug product formulation of EFX for use in Phase 3 clinical trials and, if EFX is approved, for commercialization. This formulation was developed under contract with a specialist formulation development company, Coriolis Pharma Research GmbH. We have contracted with Vetter Pharma International GmbH, ~~and will be administered through~~or Vetter, to manufacture this formulation as a dual-chamber, pre-filled syringe combination product for use in Phase 3 clinical trials. Scale-up of manufacturing ~~for this combination~~at Vetter and release of ~~a new EFX formulation and delivery device~~clinical batches is expected to be completed in ~~2022, with release of the finished combination product for use in Phase 3 clinical trials anticipated in the first half of 2023.~~2022. There is no assurance that we will be successful in completing this development ~~of our new formulation with a preferred device~~ on a timely basis, including accounting for any impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, or at all, which could impede our development and commercialization strategy for EFX. Further, the FDA or other similar foreign regulatory bodies could require nonclinical studies or clinical trials to support introduction of any new formulation or its presentation as a drug-device combination product, which could increase our development costs and delay or prevent us from proceeding with future clinical trials or commercialization of EFX, if approved.

We contract with third parties for the manufacture of EFX and the delivery device utilized for EFX and expect to continue to do so for future clinical trials and for commercialization of EFX as well as for any future product candidates. This reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of EFX, or the delivery devices utilized for EFX, or any future product candidates or medicines or that such supply will not be available to us at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

We do not have any manufacturing facilities. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third-party manufacturers for the manufacture of EFX, delivery devices utilized for EFX or any future product candidates for nonclinical and clinical testing and for commercial supply of any of these product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Reliance on third-party manufacturers may expose us to different risks than if we were to manufacture product candidates ourselves. To the extent any issues arise with our third-party manufacturers, we may be unable to establish any agreements with any other third-party manufacturers or to do so on acceptable terms. Even if we

~~Table of Contents~~

are able to establish agreements with third-party manufacturers, reliance on third-party manufacturers entails additional risks, including:

●

~~the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;~~

●

~~the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us; and~~

●

~~reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance, quality assurance and safety and pharmacovigilance reporting.~~

•

the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;

•

the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us; and

•

reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance, quality assurance and safety and pharmacovigilance reporting.

Third-party manufacturers may not be able to comply with cGMP regulations or similar regulatory requirements outside the United States. For our product candidates that are biologic-device combination products, third-party manufacturers may not be able to comply with cGMP regulatory requirements applicable to biologic-device combination products, including applicable provisions of the FDA’s drug product cGMP regulations, device cGMP requirements embodied in the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, or similar regulatory requirements outside the United States. Our failure, or the failure of third-party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or medicines, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our medicines and harm our business and results of operations.

If any CMO with whom we contract fails to perform its obligations, we may be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we may not have the capabilities or resources, or enter into an agreement with a different CMO, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In either scenario, our clinical trials supply could be delayed significantly as we establish alternative supply sources. In some cases, the technical skills required to manufacture our product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original CMO and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills to a back-up or alternate supplier, or we may be unable to transfer such skills at all. In addition, if we are required to change CMOs for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new CMO maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations. We will also need to verify, such as through a manufacturing comparability study, that any new manufacturing process will produce our product candidate according to the specifications previously submitted to the FDA or another regulatory authority. The delays associated with the verification of a new CMO could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates or commercialize our products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a CMO may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such CMO owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such CMO or require us to obtain a license from such CMO in order to have another CMO manufacture our product candidates. In addition, changes in manufacturers often involve changes in manufacturing procedures and processes, which could require that we conduct bridging studies between our prior clinical supply used in our clinical trials and that of any new manufacturer. We may be unsuccessful in demonstrating the comparability of clinical supplies which could require the conduct of additional clinical trials. Any medicines that we may develop may compete with other product candidates and products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us.39

Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers, such as delays in performance due to COVID-19, could delay clinical development or marketing approval. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply of bulk drug substance or for the manufacture of our drug product-delivery device combination. If any one of our current contract manufacturers cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace that manufacturer. Although we believe that there potentially are alternative manufacturers who could manufacture our drug substance or drug product-delivery device combination or any future product candidates, we may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement.

Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of EFX or any future product candidates or medicines may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to commercialize any medicines that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.

Table of Contents

The processes involved in manufacturing our product candidates, including pre-filled syringe presentations of our product candidates, are complex, expensive, highly regulated, and subject to multiple risks. Further, as product candidates are developed through nonclinical studies to late-stage clinical trials towards approval and commercialization, it is common that various aspects of the development program, such as manufacturing methods, are altered along the way in an effort to optimize processes and results. Such changes carry the risk that they will not achieve these intended objectives, and any of these changes could cause our product candidates to perform differently and affect the results of planned clinical trials or other future clinical trials.

In addition, the manufacturing process for any products that we may develop is subject to FDA and other comparable foreign regulatory authority approval processes and continuous oversight, and we will need to contract with manufacturers who can meet all applicable FDA and foreign regulatory authority requirements, including, for example, complying with cGMPs, applicable product tracking and tracing requirements and applicable QSRs, on an ongoing basis. If we or our third-party manufacturers are unable to reliably produce products to specifications acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities, we may not obtain or maintain the approvals we need to commercialize such products. Even if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, there is no assurance that either we or our contract manufacturers will be able to manufacture the approved product to specifications acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities, to produce it in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the potential launch of the product, or to meet potential future demand. Any of these challenges could delay completion of clinical trials, require bridging or comparability nonclinical or clinical trials or the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical study costs, delay approval of our product candidate, impair commercialization efforts, increase our cost of goods, and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

If any CMO with whom we contract fails to perform its obligations, we may be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we may not have the capabilities or resources, or enter into an agreement with a different CMO, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In either scenario, our clinical trials supply could be delayed significantly as we establish alternative supply sources. In some cases, the technical skills required to manufacture our product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original CMO and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills to a back-up or alternate supplier, or we may be unable to transfer such skills at all. In addition, if we are required to change CMOs for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new CMO maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations. We will also need to verify, such as through a manufacturing comparability study, that any new manufacturing process will produce our product candidate according to the specifications previously submitted to or approved by the FDA or another regulatory authority. The delays associated with the verification of a new CMO could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates or commercialize our products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a CMO may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such CMO owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such CMO or require us to obtain a license from such CMO in order to have another CMO manufacture our product candidates. In addition, in the case of CMOs that supply our product candidate, changes in manufacturers often involve changes in manufacturing procedures and processes, which could require that we conduct bridging studies between our prior clinical supply used in our clinical trials and that of any new manufacturer. We may be unsuccessful in demonstrating the comparability of clinical supplies which could require the conduct of additional clinical trials. Any medicines that we may develop may compete with other product candidates and products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us.

Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers, such as delays in performance due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, could delay clinical development or marketing approval. We are also unable to predict how the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic may affect our third-party manufacturers, including any potential disruptions to our global supply chain. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply of bulk drug substance or for the manufacture of our drug product-delivery device combination. If any one of our current contract manufacturers cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace that manufacturer. Although we believe that there potentially are alternative manufacturers who could manufacture our drug substance or drug product-delivery device combination or any future product candidates, we may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement.

The processes involved in manufacturing our product candidates, including pre-filled, dual-chamber syringe presentations of our product candidates, are complex, expensive, highly regulated, and subject to multiple risks. Further, as product candidates are developed through nonclinical studies to late-stage clinical trials towards approval and commercialization, it is common that various aspects of the development program, such as manufacturing methods, are altered along the way in an effort to optimize processes and results. Such changes carry the risk that they will not achieve these intended objectives, and any of these changes could cause our product candidates to perform differently and affect the results of planned clinical trials or other future clinical trials.

Table of Contents

our contract manufacturers will be able to manufacture the approved product to specifications acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities, to produce it in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the potential launch of the product, or to meet potential future demand. Any of these challenges could delay completion of clinical trials, require bridging or comparability nonclinical or clinical trials or the repetition of one or more clinical trials, increase clinical study costs, delay approval of our product candidate, impair commercialization efforts, increase our cost of goods, and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

Since March 2020, when foreign and domestic inspections of facilities were largely placed on hold, the FDA has been working to resume routine surveillance, bioresearch monitoring and pre-approval inspections on a prioritized basis. The FDA has developed a rating system to assist in determining when and where it is safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections. As of May 2021, certain inspections, such as foreign preapproval, surveillance, and for-cause inspections that are not deemed mission-critical, remain temporarily postponed. InSince April 2021 the FDA ~~issued guidance for industry formally announcing plans to employ~~has conducted limited inspections and employed remote interactive evaluations, using risk management methods, to meet user fee commitments and goal ~~dates~~dates. Ongoing travel restrictions and ~~in May 2021 announced plans~~other uncertainties continue to ~~continue progress toward resuming~~

~~Table of Contents~~

impact oversight operations both domestic and abroad and it is unclear when standard operational ~~levels.~~levels will resume. The FDA is continuing to complete mission-critical work, prioritize other higher-tiered inspectional needs (e.g., for-cause inspections), and carry out surveillance inspections using risk-based approaches for evaluating public health. Should the FDA determine that an inspection is necessary for approval and an inspection cannot be completed during the review cycle due to restrictions on travel, and the FDA does not determine a remote interactive evaluation to be adequate, the ~~FDA~~agency has stated that it generally intends to issue, depending on the circumstances, a complete response letter or defer action on the application until an inspection can be completed. ~~In 2020 and 2021,~~During the COVID-19 public health emergency, a number of companies announced receipt of complete response letters due to the FDA's inability to complete required inspections for their applications. Regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and may experience delays in their regulatory activities.

Risks Related to Our Business, Industry and Intellectual Property

Risks Related to Business Development

We are heavily dependent on the success of EFX, our only product candidate.

We currently have no products that are approved for commercial sale and may never be able to develop marketable products. We expect that a substantial portion of our efforts and expenditures over the next several years will be devoted to EFX, which is currently our only product candidate. Accordingly, our business currently depends heavily on the successful development, regulatory approval, and commercialization of EFX. We cannot be certain that EFX will receive regulatory approval or be successfully commercialized even if we receive regulatory approval. If we were required to discontinue development of EFX or if EFX does not receive regulatory approval or fails to achieve significant market acceptance, we would be delayed by many years in our ability to achieve profitability, if ever.

The research, testing, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, labeling, approval, sale, marketing, and distribution of EFX is, and will remain, subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities. Failure to obtain regulatory approval for EFX in the United States, Europe, Japan or other jurisdictions will prevent us from commercializing and marketing EFX in such jurisdictions.

Clinical development of EFX prior to the BALANCED study was conducted by Amgen, Inc., or Amgen, in patients with ~~type 2 diabetes mellitus, or~~ T2D. We did not conduct any of the development of EFX related to clinical trials in patients with T2D, and we have relied on Amgen to have conducted such research and development in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory, and scientific standards, have accurately reported the results of all nonclinical studies and clinical trials conducted prior to our license of EFX, and have correctly collected and interpreted the data from these studies and trials. To the extent any of the foregoing has not occurred, our expected development time and development costs for EFX may be increased.

Even if we were to successfully obtain approval from the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities for EFX, any approval might contain significant limitations related to use, including limitations on the stage of disease EFX is approved to treat, as well as restrictions for specified age groups, warnings, precautions or contraindications. Furthermore, even if we obtain regulatory approval for EFX, we will still need to develop a commercial infrastructure or develop relationships with collaborators to commercialize, establish a commercially viable pricing structure and obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors, including government healthcare programs. If we, or any

Table of Contents

future collaborators, are unable to successfully commercialize EFX, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to continue our business.

We have expended and will continue to expend our limited resources to pursue a particular therapeutic candidate or indication, such as our focus on developing EFX for the treatment of NASH, and may fail to capitalize on therapeutic candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

We have focused our extensive research and development efforts on EFX for the treatment of NASH. Therefore, we have, and in the future may, forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other therapeutic candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. We are highly dependent on the success of the future clinical trials of EFX, the outcomes of which are uncertain. Because EFX is our first and only therapeutic candidate, if it encounters safety, efficacy, supply or manufacturing problems, developmental delays, regulatory or commercialization issues or other problems, the value of our platform could be greatly diminished and our development plans could be curtailed and our business would be significantly harmed.

Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and EFX for the treatment of NASH may not yield any commercially viable therapeutic candidates. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular therapeutic candidate or misread trends in the biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for serious metabolic diseases, we may relinquish valuable rights to that therapeutic candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such therapeutic candidate.

At any time and for any reason, we may determine that one or more of our discovery programs or pre- clinical or clinical therapeutic candidates or programs does not have sufficient potential to warrant the allocation of resources toward such program or therapeutic candidate. Accordingly, we may choose not to develop a potential therapeutic candidate or elect to suspend, deprioritize or terminate one or more of our discovery programs or preclinical or clinical therapeutic candidates or programs. Suspending, deprioritizing or terminating a program or therapeutic candidate in which we have invested significant resources, means we will have expended resources on a program that will not provide a full return on our investment and may have missed the opportunity to have allocated those resources to potentially more productive uses, including existing or future programs or therapeutic candidates.

Our product candidate and any future product candidates must undergo rigorous clinical trials and regulatory approvals, and success in nonclinical studies or earlier-stage clinical trials may not be indicative of results in future clinical trials. EFX and any future product candidates will be subject to rigorous and extensive clinical trials and extensive regulatory approval processes implemented by the FDA and similar regulatory bodies in other jurisdictions. The approval process is typically lengthy and expensive, and approval is never certain. As a company, our only experience with clinical trials is our recently completed BALANCED study and our ~~recently initiated~~ongoing HARMONY and

~~Table of Contents~~

SYMMETRY studies, and we have not yet completed the clinical trials required to obtain regulatory approval. We may not be able to conduct clinical trials at preferred sites, enlist clinical investigators, enroll sufficient numbers of participants or begin or successfully complete clinical trials in a timely fashion, such as on account of the COVID-19 pandemic, if at all. Our anticipated clinical trials may be insufficient to demonstrate that our potential products will be active, safe or effective. Additional clinical trials may be required if clinical trial results are negative or inconclusive, which will require us to incur additional costs and significant delays.

Success in nonclinical studies and earlier-stage clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will generate the same results or otherwise provide adequate data to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of a product candidate. In addition, the design of a clinical trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. We may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support regulatory approval for a NASH therapy. In addition, there is a high failure rate for drugs and products proceeding through clinical trials. In fact, many companies in the pharmaceutical

Table of Contents

and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials even after achieving promising results in nonclinical studies and earlier-stage clinical trials. Similarly, the outcome of nonclinical studies may not predict the success of clinical trials. Moreover, data obtained from nonclinical and clinical activities are subject to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. In addition, we may experience regulatory delays or rejections as a result of many factors, including due to changes in regulatory policy during the period of our product development. Additionally, we are developing a pre-filled, dual-chamber syringe presentation of EFX that is considered to be a biologic-device combination product by the FDA, and its BLA will require review and coordination by FDA’s drug and device centers prior to approval. Any such delays could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. From time to time, we may publish interim ‘‘top-line’’ or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Preliminary or interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary or interim data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business and financial prospects.

In addition, certain of our hypotheses regarding the potential clinical and therapeutic benefit of EFX compared to other candidates in development for NASH are based on cross-trial comparisons of results that were not derived from head-to-head preclinical studies or clinical trials. These observations, which do not reflect robust comparative analyses, may suggest misleading similarities or differences due to differences in study protocols, conditions and patient populations, and may not be reliable predictors of the relative efficacy or other benefits of EFX compared to other product candidates that are in development for the treatment of NASH.

We may develop EFX, and potentially future product candidates, in combination with other therapies, which exposes us to additional risks.

We may develop EFX and future product candidates in combination with one or more approved therapies. Even if any product candidate we develop were to receive marketing approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, we would continue to be subject to the risks that the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside of the United States could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with our product candidate or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. This could result in our own products being removed from the market or being less successful commercially.

We may also evaluate EFX or any other future product candidates in combination with one or more other therapies that have not yet been approved for marketing by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside of the United States. We will not be able to market and sell EFX or any product candidate we develop in combination with any such unapproved therapies that do not ultimately obtain marketing approval. If the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside of the United States do not approve these other drugs or revoke their approval, or if safety, efficacy, manufacturing, or supply issues arise with the drugs we choose to evaluate in combination with EFX or any other product candidate we develop, we may be unable to obtain approval of or market EFX or any other product candidate we develop.

~~Table of Contents~~

Although we plan to devote a majority of our resources to the continued nonclinical and clinical testing and potential approval of EFX for the treatment of patients with NASH, another key element of our strategy is to discover, develop and commercialize a portfolio of products. We are seeking to do so through the identification and potential development of additional pipeline programs, but our resources are limited, and those that we have are geared towards nonclinical and clinical testing and seeking regulatory approval of EFX for the treatment of patients with NASH. We may also explore strategic collaborations for the development or acquisition of new product candidates, but we may not be successful in entering into such relationships. EFX is our only product candidate in clinical stages of development. Research programs to identify product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources, regardless of whether any product candidates are ultimately identified. Our research programs may initially show

Table of Contents

promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for many reasons, including:

●

~~the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential product candidates;~~

●

~~competitors may develop alternatives that render our product candidates obsolete;~~

●

~~product candidates we develop may nevertheless be covered by third parties’ patents or other exclusive rights;~~

●

a product candidate may, on further study, be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate it is unlikely to be effective or otherwise does not meet applicable regulatory criteria;

●

~~a product candidate may not be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all;~~

●

~~an approved product may not be accepted as safe and effective by trial participants, the medical community or third-party payors; and~~

●

~~intellectual property or other proprietary rights of third parties for product candidates we develop may potentially block our entry into certain markets or make such entry economically impracticable.~~

•

the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential product candidates;

•

competitors may develop alternatives that render our product candidates obsolete;

•

product candidates we develop may nevertheless be covered by third parties’ patents or other exclusive rights;

•

a product candidate may not be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all;

•

an approved product may not be accepted as safe and effective by trial participants, the medical community or third-party payors; and

•

intellectual property or other proprietary rights of third parties for product candidates we develop may potentially block our entry into certain markets or make such entry economically impracticable.

Risks Related to our License and Third-Parties

We may be required to make significant payments under our license agreement for EFX.

We acquired worldwide, exclusive rights to EFX pursuant to our license agreement with Amgen, which we refer to as the Amgen Agreement. Under the Amgen Agreement, in consideration for the license, we made an upfront payment of $5.0 million to Amgen and also issued 2,653,333 shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock to Amgen at the time of the initial closing of our Series A Preferred Stock financing in June 2018, with a subsequent 3,205,128 shares of our Series A convertible preferred stock issued at the time of the second closing of the Series A Preferred Stock financing in November 2018. On July 2, 2019, we announced the dosing of the first patient in the BALANCED study of EFX, which resulted in a $2.5 million milestone obligation under the Amgen Agreement. As additional consideration for the license, we are required to pay Amgen $7.5 million in connection with dosing the first patient in a Phase 3 clinical trial, up to $30.0 million in connection with marketing approvals and aggregate milestone payments of up to $75.0 million upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones. Commencing on the first commercial sale of licensed products, we are obligated to pay tiered royalties of low to high single-digit percentages on annual net sales of the products covered by the license. If milestone or other non-royalty obligations become due, we may not have sufficient funds available to meet our obligations, which will materially adversely affect our business operations and financial condition.

If we breach our license agreement with Amgen related to EFX, we could lose the ability to continue the development and commercialization of EFX.

We are dependent on patents, know-how and proprietary technology in-licensed from Amgen. Our commercial success depends upon our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidate or any future product candidates and use our and our licensor’s proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third

~~Table of Contents~~

parties. Amgen may have the right to terminate the license agreement in full in the event we materially breach or default in the performance of any of the obligations under the license agreement. A termination of the license agreement with Amgen could result in the loss of significant rights and could harm our ability to commercialize our product candidates.

Disputes may also arise between us and Amgen, as well as any future potential licensors, regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including:

●

~~the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;~~

●

~~whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;~~

●

~~our right to sublicense patent and other rights to third parties under collaborative development relationships;~~

●

our diligence obligations with respect to the use of the licensed technology in relation to our development and commercialization of our product candidate and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations; and

●

~~the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners.~~

•

the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;

•

whether and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the licensing agreement;

•

our right to sublicense patent and other rights to third parties under collaborative development relationships;

•

Table of Contents

•

the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our partners.

If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates.

In addition, the Amgen Agreement under which we currently license intellectual property is complex, and certain provisions may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the Amgen Agreement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangement on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.

We are generally also subject to all of the same risks with respect to protection of intellectual property that we license, as we are for intellectual property that we own, which are described below. If we or our licensors fail to adequately protect this intellectual property, our ability to commercialize products could suffer.

We may seek to establish collaborations, and, if we are not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans.

We may pursue collaborations in order to develop and commercialize EFX and any future product candidates. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products and the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborators may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate.

Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators.

~~Table of Contents~~

We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of the product candidate for which we are seeking to collaborate, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidate or any future product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Employee Matters and Growth

We must attract and retain highly skilled employees in order to succeed. If we are not able to retain our current senior management team and our scientific advisors or continue to attract and retain qualified scientific, technical and business personnel, our business will suffer.

To succeed, we must recruit, retain, manage and motivate qualified clinical, scientific, technical and management personnel and we face significant competition for experienced personnel. If we do not succeed in attracting and retaining qualified personnel, particularly at the management level, it could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan and harm our operating results. We are dependent on the members of our management team and our scientific advisors for our business success. We do not maintain “key person” insurance for any of our key personnel. An important element of our strategy is to take advantage of the research and development expertise of our current management and to utilize the expertise of our scientific advisors in the NASH field. We currently have employment agreements with all of our executive officers. Our employment agreements with our executive officers are terminable by them without notice and some provide for severance and change in control benefits. The loss of any one of our executive officers or key scientific consultants could result in a significant loss in the knowledge and experience that we, as an organization, possess and could cause significant delays, or outright failure, in the development and further commercialization of our product candidate or any future product candidates.

There is intense competition for qualified personnel, including management, in the technical fields in which we operate, and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel necessary for the successful research, development and commercialization of EFX or any future product candidates. In particular, we have experienced a very competitive hiring environment in the San Francisco Bay Area, where we are headquartered. Many of the other pharmaceutical companies that we compete against for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than we do. They also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than what we have to offer. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate and success with which we can discover and develop product candidates and our business will be limited.

Our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners and vendors may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements.

We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies, and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors, or collaborators that would violate the law or regulation, including, without limitation, healthcare, employment, foreign corrupt practices, environmental, competition, and patient privacy and other privacy laws and regulations. Such improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal investigations, and monetary and injunctive penalties, and could adversely impact our ability to conduct business, operating results, and reputation.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other illegal activity by our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners and vendors. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct that fails to comply with the laws enforced by the FDA and other similar foreign regulatory bodies, fails to provide true, complete and accurate information to the FDA and other similar foreign regulatory bodies, fails to comply with manufacturing standards we have established, fails to comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws in the United States and similar foreign laws, or fails to report financial information or data

~~Table of Contents~~

accurately or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. If we obtain FDA approval of any of our product candidates and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our potential exposure under these laws will increase significantly, and our costs associated with compliance with these laws are also likely to increase. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. These laws may impact, among other things, our current activities with principal investigators and research patients, as well as proposed and future sales, marketing and education programs. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct,

Table of Contents

and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from government investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could result in significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.

We may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could adversely affect our operations.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~April 29, 2022, we had 3135 full-time employees and one part-time employee. As we continue development and pursue the potential commercialization of EFX and other product candidates, as well as function as a public company, we will need to expand our financial, development, regulatory, manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities or contract with third parties to provide these capabilities for us. As our operations expand, we expect that we will need to manage additional relationships with various strategic collaborators, suppliers and other third parties. Our future financial performance and our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidate and to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to manage any future growth effectively.

We may acquire additional technology and complementary businesses in the future. Acquisitions involve many risks, any of which could materially harm our business, including the diversion of management’s attention from core business concerns, failure to effectively exploit acquired technologies, failure to successfully integrate the acquired business or realize expected synergies or the loss of key employees from either our business or the acquired businesses.

Risks Related to Protecting Our Intellectual Property

Our success depends upon our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our products and technologies. It is difficult and costly to protect our proprietary rights and technology, and we may not be able to ensure their protection.

Our success will depend in significant part on our and our current or future licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ ability to establish and maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property covering the product candidates we plan to develop, and the ability to develop these product candidates and commercialize the products resulting therefrom, without infringing the intellectual property rights of others. We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary technologies that we believe are important to our business, including seeking patents intended to cover our products and compositions, their methods of use, and any other inventions that are important to the development of our business. In addition to taking other steps to protect our intellectual property, we have applied for, and intend to continue to apply for, patents with claims covering our technologies, processes and product candidates when and where we deem it appropriate to do so. Our in-licensed patents and patent applications in both United States and certain foreign jurisdictions relate to EFX and related Fc-fusion polypeptides. There can be no assurance that the claims of our patents or any patent application that issues as a patent, will exclude others from making, using or selling our product candidate or any future product candidates or products that are substantially similar to our product candidate or any future product candidates. We also rely on trade secrets to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection. In countries where we have not and do not seek patent protection, third

~~Table of Contents~~

parties may be able to manufacture and sell our product candidate or any future product candidates without our permission, and we may not be able to stop them from doing so.

With respect to patent rights, we do not know whether any of the pending patent applications for our product candidate or any future product candidates will result in the issuance of patents that effectively protect our technologies, processes and product candidates, or if any of our issued patents or our current or future licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ issued patents will effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies, processes and products. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing or in some cases not at all, until they are issued as a patent. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we or our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators were the first to make or file on the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent applications, or that we or our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. There is also no assurance that all of the potentially relevant prior art

Table of Contents

relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, which could be used by a third party to challenge the validity of our patents, should they issue, or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Any of the foregoing could harm our competitive position, business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Any changes we make to our product candidate or any future product candidates, including formulations that may be required for commercialization, or that cause them to have what we view as more advantageous properties may not be covered by our existing patents and patent applications, and we may be required to file new applications and/or seek other forms of protection for any such altered product candidates. The patent landscape surrounding the technology underlying our product candidate or any future product candidates is crowded, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to secure patent protection that would adequately cover an alternative to our product candidate or any future product candidates.

The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we and our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators may not be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we or our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators will fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection for them. Moreover, in some circumstances, we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain or enforce the patents, covering technology that we license from or license to third parties and may be reliant on our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators to perform these activities, which means that these patent applications may not be prosecuted, and these patents enforced, in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators fail to establish, maintain, protect or enforce such patents and other intellectual property rights, such rights may be reduced or eliminated. If our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators are not fully cooperative or disagree with us as to the prosecution, maintenance or enforcement of any patent rights, such patent rights could be compromised.

The patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including our patent position, involve complex legal and factual questions, which in recent years have been the subject of much litigation, and, therefore, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability, and commercial value of any patent claims that we have rights or may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents has emerged to date in the United States or in many foreign jurisdictions. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our and our current or future licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ patent rights are highly uncertain. Our and our current or future licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued that protect our technology or product candidates, or products resulting therefrom, in whole or in part, or that effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. The patent examination process may require us or our current or future licensors, licensees or collaborators to narrow the scope of the claims of pending and future patent applications, which would limit the scope of patent protection that is obtained, if any. Our and our current or future licensors’, licensees’ or collaborators’ patent applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing the technology that is currently claimed in such applications unless and until a

~~Table of Contents~~

patent issues from such applications, and then only to the extent the claims that issue are broad enough to cover the technology being practiced by third parties.

Furthermore, given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after the resulting products are commercialized. As a result, our owned and in-licensed patents may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours. We expect to seek extensions of patent terms for our issued patents, where available. This includes in the United States under the Hatch-Waxman Act, which permits a patent term extension of up to five years beyond the original expiration date of the patent as compensation for regulatory delays. However, such a patent term extension cannot lengthen the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the product’s approval date. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for the extension and the application for the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the patent and within 60 days of product approval. During the period of patent term extension, the claims of a patent are not enforceable for their full scope but are instead limited to the scope of the approved product. In addition, the applicable authorities, including the FDA in the United States, and any equivalent regulatory authority in other countries, may not agree with our assessment of whether such extensions are available, and may refuse to grant extensions to our patents, or may grant more limited extensions

Table of Contents

than we request. In addition, we may not be granted an extension because of, for example, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to the expiration of relevant patents or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. If this occurs, any period during which we have the right to exclusively market our product will be shorter than we would otherwise expect, and our competitors may obtain approval of and launch products earlier than might otherwise be the case.

Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position on our product candidate or any future product candidates for an adequate amount of time.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional filing date. Various extensions may be available, but the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. A number of U.S. patents directed to various aspects of EFX will expire in 2029; we currently anticipate that a composition of matter patent will be eligible for patent term extension to 2034. Even if patents covering our product candidate or any future product candidate are obtained, once the patent life has expired, we may be open to competition from competitive products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting our product candidate or any future product candidate might expire before or shortly after we or our partners commercialize those candidates. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

The legal protection afforded to inventors and owners of intellectual property in countries outside of the United States may not be as protective or effective as that in the United States and we may, therefore, be unable to acquire and enforce intellectual property rights outside the United States to the same extent as in the United States. Whether filed in the United States or abroad, our patent applications may be challenged or may fail to result in issued patents.

In addition, our existing patents and any future patents we obtain may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing or commercializing competing products. Furthermore, others may independently develop or commercialize similar or alternative technologies or drugs, or design around our patents. Our patents may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or narrowed, or fail to provide us with any competitive advantages. In many foreign countries, patent applications and/or issued patents, or parts thereof, must be translated into the native language. If our patent applications or issued patents are translated incorrectly, they may not adequately cover our technologies; in some countries, it may not be possible to rectify an incorrect translation, which may result in patent protection that does not adequately cover our technologies in those countries.

Filing, prosecuting, enforcing and defending patents on product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States are less

~~Table of Contents~~

extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and certain state laws in the United States. Consequently, we and our licensor may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our and our licensor’s inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our and our licensor’s inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our and our licensor’s technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we and our licensor have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our product candidate or any future product candidates and our and our licensor’s patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology. This could make it difficult for us and our licensor to stop the infringement of our and our licensor’s patents or the marketing of competing products in violation of our and our licensor’s proprietary rights, generally. Proceedings to enforce our and our licensor’s patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our and our licensor’s efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our and our licensor’s patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, could place our and our licensor’s patent applications at risk of not issuing and could

Table of Contents

provoke third parties to assert claims against us or our licensor. We or our licensor may not prevail in any lawsuits that we or our licensor initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful.

The requirements for patentability differ in certain countries, particularly developing countries. For example, China has a heightened requirement for patentability and, specifically, requires a detailed description of medical uses of a claimed drug. In addition, India, certain countries in Europe and certain developing countries, including Thailand, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. In those countries, we and our licensor may have limited remedies if patents are infringed or if we or our licensor are compelled to grant a license to a third party, which could materially diminish the value of those patents. This could limit our potential revenue opportunities. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. Accordingly, our and our licensor’s efforts to enforce intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we own or license.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance and annuity fees on issued United States patents and most foreign patent applications and patents must be paid to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, and foreign patent agencies, respectively, in order to maintain such patents and patent applications. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application, examination and issuance processes. While an inadvertent lapse can, in some cases, be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or our licensor fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidate or any future product candidates, our competitors might be able to enter the market with similar or identical products or technology, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

We may be unable to obtain intellectual property rights or technology necessary to develop and commercialize EFX or any future product candidates.

Several third parties are actively researching and seeking and obtaining patent protection in the NASH field, and there are issued third-party patents and published third-party patent applications in these fields. However, we may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our product candidate or any future product candidates and technologies.

Depending on what patent claims ultimately issue and how courts construe the issued patent claims, as well as depending on the ultimate formulation and method of use of our product candidate or any future product candidates, we may need to obtain a license under such patents. There can be no assurance that such licenses will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If a third party does not offer us a necessary license or offers a license only on terms that are unattractive or unacceptable to us, we might be unable to develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidate or any future product candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, even if we obtain licenses to such intellectual property, but subsequently fail to meet our obligations under our license agreements, or such license agreements are terminated for any other reasons, we may lose our rights to in-licensed technologies.

The licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and several more established companies may pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, capital resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities. In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or

Table of Contents

acquire third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment, or at all. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights or maintain the existing intellectual property rights we have, we may have to abandon development of the relevant program or product candidate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our inability to protect our confidential information and trade secrets would harm our business and competitive position.

In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and products, in our activities we also rely substantially on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary materials and information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect these trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. However, these steps may be inadequate, we may fail to enter into agreements with all such parties or any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information and there may be no adequate remedy available for such breach of an agreement. We cannot assure you that our proprietary information will not be disclosed or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts both within and outside the United States may be less willing, or unwilling, to protect trade secrets. If a competitor lawfully obtained or independently developed any of our trade secrets, we would have no right to prevent such competitor from using that technology or information to compete with us, which could harm our competitive position.

~~Table of Contents~~

Risks Related to Intellectual Property Litigation

We may become involved in lawsuits or other proceedings to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful and have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Third parties may infringe our or our licensor’s patents or misappropriate or otherwise violate our or our licensor’s intellectual property rights. In the future, we or our licensor may initiate legal proceedings to enforce or defend our or our licensor’s intellectual property rights, to protect our or our licensor’s trade secrets or to determine the validity or scope of intellectual property rights we own or control. Also, third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us or our licensor to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property rights we own, control or to which we have rights. For example, generic or biosimilar drug manufacturers or other competitors or third parties may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of our or our licensor’s patents, requiring us or our licensor to engage in complex, lengthy and costly litigation or other proceedings. These proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming and many of our or our licensor’s adversaries in these proceedings may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than we can. Moreover, the outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. Accordingly, despite our or our licensor’s efforts, we or our licensor may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating intellectual property rights we own, control or have rights to, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources, which could harm our business and financial results. In addition, if we or our licensor initiated legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering a product candidate, the defendant could counterclaim that such patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. In an infringement or declaratory judgment proceeding, a court may decide that a patent owned by or licensed to us is invalid or unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our or our licensor’s patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of our or our licensor’s patents at risk of being invalidated, narrowed, held

Table of Contents

unenforceable or interpreted in such a manner that would not preclude third parties from entering the market with competing products.

Third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO, or opposition, derivation, revocation, reexamination, inter partes review or interference proceedings, or other pre-issuance or post-grant proceedings or other patent office proceedings or litigation in the United States or other jurisdictions provoked by third parties or brought by us or our licensor, may be necessary to determine the inventorship, priority, patentability or validity of inventions with respect to our or our licensor’s patents or patent applications. An unfavorable outcome could leave our technology or product candidates without patent protection, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or product candidates and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or could require us or our licensor to obtain license rights from the prevailing party in order to be able to manufacture or commercialize our product candidate or any future product candidates without infringing third-party patent rights. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us or our licensor a license on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Even if we or our licensor obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us or our licensor. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our or our licensor’s patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or any future product candidates. Even if we successfully defend such litigation or proceeding, we may incur substantial costs and it may distract our management and other employees. In addition, the uncertainties associated with litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our clinical trials, continue our research programs, license necessary technology from third parties, or enter into collaborations.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, many foreign jurisdictions have rules of discovery that are different than those in the United

~~Table of Contents~~

States and which may make defending or enforcing our or our licensor’s patents extremely difficult. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of shares of our common stock.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights or we may initiate legal proceedings against third parties to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property rights controlled by third parties, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Our commercial success depends upon our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell any product candidates that we may develop and use our proprietary technologies without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property and proprietary rights of third parties. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. Third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us or our licensor alleging that we or our licensor infringe their intellectual property rights or we or our licensor may initiate legal proceedings against third parties to challenge the validity or scope of intellectual property rights controlled by third parties, including in oppositions, interferences, revocations, reexaminations, inter partes review or derivation proceedings before the USPTO or its counterparts in other jurisdictions. These proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming and many of our or our licensor’s adversaries in these proceedings may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to prosecuting these legal actions than we or our licensor can.

An unfavorable outcome in any such proceeding could require us or our licensor to cease using the related technology or developing or commercializing our product candidate or any future product candidates, or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

We could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product candidate or any future product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business.

Table of Contents

We perform searches of patent and scientific databases in order to identify documents that may be of potential relevance to the freedom-to-operate and/or patentability of our product candidate or any future product candidates. In general, such searches are conducted based on keywords, sequences, inventors/authors and assignees/entities to capture U.S. and European patents and patent applications, PCT publications and scientific journal articles.

The patent landscape around our EFX product candidate is complex, and we may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our product candidate or any future product candidates and technologies. Moreover, it is possible that we are or may become aware of patents or pending patent applications that we think do not relate to our product candidate or any future product candidates or that we believe are invalid or unenforceable, but that may nevertheless be interpreted to encompass our product candidate or any future product candidates and to be valid and enforceable. As to pending third-party applications, we cannot predict with any certainty which claims will issue, if any, or the scope of such issued claims. If any third-party intellectual property claims are asserted against us, even if we believe the claims are without merit, there is no assurance that a court would find in our favor, e.g., on questions of infringement, validity, enforceability or priority. A court of competent jurisdiction could hold that these third-party patents are valid, enforceable and infringed, which could materially and adversely affect our ability and the ability of our licensor to commercialize any product candidates we may develop, and any other product candidates or technologies covered by the asserted third-party patents. In order to successfully challenge the validity of any such U.S. patent in federal court, we would need to overcome a presumption of validity. As this burden is a high one requiring us to present clear and convincing evidence as to the invalidity of any such U.S. patent claim, there is no assurance that a court of competent jurisdiction would invalidate the claims of any such U.S. patent. If any such third-party patents (including those that may issue from such applications) were successfully asserted against us or our licensor or other commercialization partners and we were unable to successfully challenge the validity or enforceability of any such asserted patents, then we or our licensor and other commercialization partners may be prevented from

~~Table of Contents~~

commercializing our product candidate or any future product candidates, or may be required to pay significant damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to willfully infringe the asserted patents, or obtain a license to such patents, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us, and it could require us to make substantial licensing and royalty payments. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation or administrative proceedings, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure. In addition, any uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional funds or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Any of the foregoing would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that our employees or we have misappropriated a third party’s intellectual property, or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.

Many of our employees, including our senior management, were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Some of these employees executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements in connection with such previous employment. We may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed confidential information or intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such employee’s former employer, or that third parties have an interest in our patents as an inventor or co-inventor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel or sustain other damages. Such intellectual property rights could be awarded to a third party, and we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to commercialize our technology or products. Such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Even if we successfully prosecute or defend against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and distract management.

In addition, while it is our policy to require our employees and contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing, or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims

Table of Contents

that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property. Such claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats.

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect our business or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. For example:

●

•

others may be able to make products that are similar to any product candidates we may develop or utilize similar technology but that are not covered by the claims of the patents that we license or may own in the future;

●

~~we, or our current or future collaborators, might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by the issued patents and pending patent applications that we license or may own in the future;~~

●

~~we, or our current or future collaborators, might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of our or their inventions;~~

●

~~others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our owned or licensed intellectual property rights;~~

●

~~it is possible that our pending patent applications or those that we may own in the future will not lead to issued patents;~~

•

we, or our current or future collaborators, might not have been the first to make the inventions covered by the issued patents and pending patent applications that we license or may own in the future;

•

~~Table~~we, or our current or future collaborators, might not have been the first to file patent applications covering certain of ~~Contents~~

our or their inventions;

●

~~issued patents that we hold rights to may be held invalid or unenforceable, including as a result of legal challenges by our competitors;~~

●

our competitors might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets;

●

~~we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;~~

●

~~the patents of others may harm our business; and~~

●

~~we may choose not to file a patent application in order to maintain certain trade secrets or know-how, and a third party may subsequently file a patent covering such intellectual property.~~

•

others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies without infringing our owned or licensed intellectual property rights;

•

it is possible that our pending patent applications or those that we may own in the future will not lead to issued patents;

•

issued patents that we hold rights to may be held invalid or unenforceable, including as a result of legal challenges by our competitors;

•

we may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable;

•

the patents of others may harm our business; and

•

we may choose not to file a patent application in order to maintain certain trade secrets or know-how, and a third party may subsequently file a patent covering such intellectual property.

Should any of these events occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Issued patents covering our product candidates could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court or the USPTO.

If we or our licensing partner initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering our product candidate or any future product candidates, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate, as applicable, is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace, and there are numerous grounds upon which a third party can assert invalidity or unenforceability of a patent. Third parties may also raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. These types of mechanisms include inter partes review, post grant review, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). These types of proceedings could result in revocation or amendment to our patents such that they no longer cover our product candidates. The outcome for any particular patent following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we, our patent counsel and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, or if we are otherwise unable to adequately protect our rights, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our product candidates. A loss of patent protection for our product candidates could have a material adverse impact on our ability to commercialize or license our technology and product candidates and, resultantly, on our business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations.

Likewise, patents directed to our proprietary technologies and our product candidates may expire before or soon after our first product achieves marketing approval in the United States or foreign jurisdictions. Upon the expiration of our current patents, we may lose the right to exclude others from practicing these inventions. The expiration of these

Table of Contents

patents could also have a similar material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations. A number of U.S. patents directed to various aspects of EFX will expire in 2029; we currently anticipate that a composition of matter patent will be eligible for patent term extension to 2034.

Changes in patent law could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our product candidate or any future product candidates.

As is the case with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biotechnology industry involves technological and legal complexity, and obtaining and enforcing biotechnology patents is costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances, weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations or ruling that certain subject matter is not eligible for patent protection. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our and our licensor’s ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Depending on decisions by Congress, the federal courts, the USPTO and equivalent bodies in foreign jurisdictions, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our and our licensor’s ability to obtain new patents or to enforce existing patents and patents we and our licensor may obtain in the future.

~~Table of Contents~~

Patent reform laws, such as the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, as well as changes in how patent laws are interpreted, could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our and our licensor’s patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our or our licensor’s issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

Risks Related to Obtaining Regulatory Approval

We have limited experience in conducting clinical trials and have never obtained approval for any product candidates, and may be unable to do so successfully.

As a company, other than the ~~recently~~ completed BALANCED study and our ongoing HARMONY and SYMMETRY studies, we have no experience in designing, conducting or completing clinical trials and have never progressed a product candidate through to regulatory approval. In part because of this lack of experience, our clinical trials may require more time and incur greater costs than we anticipate. We cannot be certain that the planned clinical trials will begin or conclude on time, if at all. Large-scale trials will require significant additional financial and management resources. Any performance failure on the part of such third parties could delay the clinical development of our product candidate or any future product candidates or delay or prevent us from obtaining regulatory approval or commercializing our current or any future product candidates, depriving us of potential product revenue and resulting in additional losses.

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. Our inability to obtain regulatory approval for EFX or any future product candidate would substantially harm our business.

The time required to obtain approval from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of nonclinical studies and clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of regulatory authorities. In addition, approval policies, regulations or the type and amount of clinical data necessary to gain approval may change during the course of a product candidate’s development and may vary among jurisdictions.

EFX or our future product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval from the FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority for many reasons, including:

●

~~disagreement with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;~~

●

~~failure to demonstrate that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication;~~

●

~~failure of clinical trials to meet the level of statistical significance required for approval;~~

●

~~failure to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;~~

●

~~disagreement with our interpretation of data from nonclinical studies or clinical trials;~~

●

~~the insufficiency of data collected from clinical trials of EFX or any future product candidates to obtain regulatory approval;~~

●

~~failure to obtain approval of the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with whom we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; or~~

●

~~changes in the approval policies or regulations that render our nonclinical and clinical data insufficient for approval.~~

•

disagreement with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

•

failure to demonstrate that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication;

•

failure of clinical trials to meet the level of statistical significance required for approval;

Table of Contents

•

failure to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;

•

disagreement with our interpretation of data from nonclinical studies or clinical trials;

•

the insufficiency of data collected from clinical trials of EFX or any future product candidates to obtain regulatory approval;

•

failure to obtain approval of the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with whom we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; or

•

changes in the approval policies or regulations that render our nonclinical and clinical data insufficient for approval.

The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may require more information, including additional nonclinical or clinical data to support approval, which may delay or prevent approval and our commercialization plans, or we may decide to abandon the development program for other reasons. If we were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve EFX or any future product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may require labeling or a Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, that includes significant use or distribution restrictions or safety warnings, precautions, or contraindications, may grant approval contingent on the performance of

~~Table of Contents~~

costly post-marketing clinical trials or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate.

Additionally, as of May 26, 2021, the FDA noted it is continuing to ensure timely reviews of applications for medical products during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in line with its user fee performance ~~goals and conducting mission critical domestic and foreign inspections to ensure compliance of manufacturing facilities with FDA quality standards.~~goals. However, the FDA may not be able to continue its current pace and approval timelines could be extended, including where a pre-approval inspection or an inspection of clinical sites is required and due to the COVID-19 pandemic and travel restrictions the FDA is unable to complete such required inspections during the review period. ~~In 2020 and 2021,~~During the COVID-19 pandemic, a number of companies announced receipt of complete response letters due to the FDA's inability to complete required inspections for their applications.

Additional time may be required to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates because they are combination products.

EFX is being developed, and future product candidates may be developed, as combination products that require coordination within the FDA and similar foreign regulatory agencies for review of their device and drug/biologic components. Medical products containing a combination of new drugs, biological products or medical devices may be regulated as “combination products” in the United States and Europe. A combination product generally is defined as a product comprised of components from two or more regulatory categories (e.g., drug/device, device/biologic, drug/biologic). Each component of a combination product is subject to the requirements established by the FDA for that type of component, whether a new drug, biologic or device. In order to facilitate premarket review of combination products, the FDA designates one of its centers to have primary jurisdiction for the pre-market review and regulation of the overall product based upon a determination by the FDA of the primary mode of action of the combination product. Where approval of the drug or biologic and device is sought under a single application, there could be delays in the approval process due to the increased complexity of the review process and the lack of a well-established review process and criteria. The EMA has a parallel review process in place for combination products, the potential effects of which in terms of approval and timing could independently affect our ability to market our combination products in Europe.

While we intend to seek designations for our product candidates with the FDA and comparable other regulatory authorities that are intended to confer benefits such as a faster development process or an accelerated regulatory pathway, there can be no assurance that we will successfully obtain such designations. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates are granted such designations, we may not be able to realize the intended benefits of such designations.

The FDA and comparable other regulatory authorities offer certain designations for product candidates that are designed to encourage the research and development of product candidates that are intended to address conditions with significant unmet medical need. These designations may confer benefits such as additional interaction with regulatory authorities, a potentially accelerated regulatory pathway and priority review. Despite these designations, there can be no assurance that we will successfully obtain these or other designations for any of our other product candidates. In addition, while such designations could expedite the development or review process, they generally do not change the

Table of Contents

standards for approval. Even if we obtain such designations for one or more of our product candidates, there can be no assurance that we will realize their intended benefits.

For example, we may seek a Breakthrough Therapy designation for some of our product candidates. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a therapy that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other therapies, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the therapy may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For therapies that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ~~ineffective~~ control regimens. Designation as a breakthrough therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the criteria for designation as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a Breakthrough Therapy designation for a

~~Table of Contents~~

product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to therapies considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our product candidates qualify as breakthrough therapies, the FDA may later decide that such product candidates no longer meet the conditions for qualification.

In addition, in October 2021, the FDA granted Fast Track designation for EFX for the treatment of NASH, and we may seek Fast Track Designation for some of our future product candidates. If a therapy is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the therapy demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the therapy sponsor may apply for Fast Track Designation. The FDA has broad discretion whether or not to grant this designation, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for this designation, there can be no assurance that the FDA would decide to grant it. Even if we do receive Fast Track Designation, as we have for EFX for the treatment of NASH, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures, and receiving a Fast Track Designation does not provide assurance of ultimate FDA approval. In addition, the FDA may withdraw Fast Track Designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program.

Biologics designated as breakthrough therapies or granted Fast Track designation by the FDA may also be eligible for other expedited approval programs, including accelerated approval. A product candidate may be eligible for accelerated approval if it treats a serious or life-threatening condition, generally provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies, and demonstrates an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. As a condition of accelerated approval, the FDA may require that a sponsor of a product receiving accelerated approval perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials. These confirmatory trials must be completed with due diligence. Accelerated approval may also be withdrawn if, among other things, a confirmatory trial required to verify the predicted clinical benefit of the product fails to verify such benefit or if such trial is not conducted with due diligence. In addition, for products being considered for accelerated approval, the FDA generally requires, unless otherwise informed by the agency, that all advertising and promotional materials intended for dissemination or publication within 120 days of marketing approval be submitted to the agency for review during the pre-approval review period, which could adversely impact the timing of the commercial launch of the product. Thus, even if we seek to utilize the accelerated approval pathway, we may not be able to obtain accelerated approval and, even if we do, we may not experience a faster development, regulatory review or approval process for that product. In addition, receiving accelerated approval does not assure that the product’s accelerated approval will eventually be converted to a traditional approval.

We may seek priority review designation for one or more of our product candidates, but we might not receive such designation, and even if we do, such designation may not lead to a faster regulatory review or approval process.

If the FDA determines that a product candidate offers a treatment for a serious condition and, if approved, the product would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness, the FDA may designate the product candidate for priority review. A priority review designation means that the goal for the FDA to review an application is six months, rather than the standard review period of ten months. We may request priority review for our product candidates. The FDA has broad discretion with respect to whether or not to grant priority review status to a product candidate, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for such designation or status, the FDA may decide not to grant it. Moreover, a priority review designation does not result in expedited development and does not necessarily result in expedited regulatory review or approval process or necessarily confer any advantage with respect to

Table of Contents

approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. Receiving priority review from the FDA does not guarantee approval within the six-month review cycle or at all.

Our failure to obtain regulatory approval in international jurisdictions would prevent us from marketing EFX or any future product candidates outside the United States.

We intend to market any approved products in the United States, the European Union, Japan and other foreign jurisdictions. Even if our products are approved for marketing in the United States, in order to market and sell our products in other jurisdictions, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, we must secure product reimbursement approvals before regulatory authorities will approve the product for sale in that country. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. Further, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries and regulatory approval in one country does not ensure approval in any other country. For example, even if EFX is approved in the United States, the EMA may require more information, including additional nonclinical or clinical data to support approval, which may delay or prevent approval and our commercialization plans in the European Union. Moreover, a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others.

Also, regulatory approval for our product candidate or any future product candidates may be withdrawn if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements, if problems occur after the product candidate reaches the market or for other reasons. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and fail to receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidate or any future product candidates will be harmed and our business will be adversely affected. We may not

~~Table of Contents~~

obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions. Approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. If we fail to obtain approval of our product candidate or any future product candidates by regulatory authorities in another country, we will be unable to commercialize our product in that country, and the commercial prospects of that product candidate and our business prospects could decline.

Risks Related to Ongoing Regulatory Obligations

Clinical trials are conducted in representative samples of the potential patient population which may have significant variability. Even if we receive regulatory approval for EFX or any of our future product candidates, we will have tested them in only a small number of patients during our clinical trials. Clinical trials are by design based on a limited number of subjects and of limited duration for exposure to the product used to determine whether, on a potentially statistically significant basis, the planned safety and efficacy of any product candidate can be achieved. As with the results of any statistical sampling, we cannot be sure that all side effects of our product candidates may be uncovered, and it may be the case that only with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to the product candidate for a longer duration, may a more complete safety profile be identified. Further, even larger clinical trials may not identify rare serious adverse effects or the duration of such studies may not be sufficient to identify when those events may occur. If our applications for marketing are approved and more patients begin to use our product, new risks and side effects associated with our products may be discovered. There have been other products that have been approved by the regulatory authorities but for which safety concerns have been uncovered following approval. Such safety concerns have led to labelling changes or withdrawal of products from the market, and any of our product candidates may be subject to similar risks. Additionally, we may be required to conduct additional nonclinical and clinical trials, require additional warnings on the label of our product candidate, reformulate our product or make changes, create a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients and obtain new

Table of Contents

approvals for our and our suppliers’ manufacturing facilities for EFX and any future product candidates. We might have to withdraw or recall our products from the marketplace. We may also experience a significant drop in the potential sales of our product if and when regulatory approvals for such product are obtained, experience harm to our reputation in the marketplace or become subject to lawsuits, including class actions. Any of these results could decrease or prevent any sales of our approved product or substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing and marketing our product.

Even if our current product candidate or any future product candidates receive regulatory approval, they will remain subject to extensive regulatory scrutiny and may still face future development and regulatory difficulties.

Even if we obtained regulatory approval for a product candidate, regulatory authorities may still impose significant restrictions on our product candidates, including their indicated uses or marketing, or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies. For example, if EFX is approved by the FDA based on a surrogate endpoint pursuant to accelerated approval regulations (also referred to as Subpart E regulations), we will be required to conduct additional confirmatory clinical trials demonstrating the clinical benefit on the ultimate outcome of NASH. Further, even if we obtained regulatory approval for a product candidate, it would be subject to ongoing requirements by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities governing the manufacture, quality control, further development, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, safety surveillance, import, export, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and reporting of safety and other post-market information.

The FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities will continue to closely monitor the safety profile of any product even after approval. If the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities become aware of new safety information after approval of our product candidate or any future product candidates, they may require labeling changes or establishment of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy or similar strategy, impose significant restrictions on a

~~Table of Contents~~

product’s indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance.

In addition, manufacturers of our products, if approved, and their facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP and applicable QSRs, regulations and standards. If we or a regulatory agency discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or us, including requiring recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing. If we, EFX, or any future product candidates or the manufacturing facilities for EFX, the delivery ~~devices~~device used for EFX, or any future product candidates fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, or undesirable side effects caused by such products are identified, a regulatory agency may:

●

~~issue safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases or other communications containing warnings about such product;~~

●

~~mandate modifications to instructions for use;~~

●

~~mandate modifications to promotional materials or require us to provide corrective information to healthcare practitioners;~~

●

~~require that we conduct post-marketing studies;~~

●

~~require us to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions and penalties for noncompliance;~~

●

~~seek an injunction or impose civil or criminal penalties or monetary fines;~~

●

~~suspend marketing of, withdraw regulatory approval of or recall such product;~~

●

~~suspend any ongoing clinical trials;~~

●

~~refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to applications filed by us;~~

●

~~suspend or impose restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements; or~~

●

~~seize or detain products, refuse to permit the import or export of products or require us to initiate a product recall.~~

•

issue safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases or other communications containing warnings about such product;

•

mandate modifications to instructions for use;

•

mandate modifications to promotional materials or require us to provide corrective information to healthcare practitioners;

•

require that we conduct post-marketing studies;

•

require us to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions and penalties for noncompliance;

•

seek an injunction or impose civil or criminal penalties or monetary fines;

•

suspend marketing of, withdraw regulatory approval of or recall such product;

•

suspend any ongoing clinical trials;

•

refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to applications filed by us;

•

suspend or impose restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements; or

•

seize or detain products, refuse to permit the import or export of products or require us to initiate a product recall.

The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize our product and generate revenue.

Table of Contents

Advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval in the United States will be heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, state attorneys general, members of Congress and the public. Violations, including promotion of our products for unapproved (or off-label) uses, are subject to enforcement letters, inquiries and investigations, and civil and criminal sanctions by the government. Additionally, comparable foreign regulatory authorities will heavily scrutinize advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval outside of the United States.

In the United States, engaging in the impermissible promotion of our products for off-label uses can also subject us to false claims litigation under federal and state statutes, which can lead to civil and criminal penalties and fines and agreements that materially restrict the manner in which a company promotes or distributes drug products. These false claims statutes include the federal False Claims Act, which allows any individual to bring a lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company on behalf of the federal government alleging submission of false or fraudulent claims, or causing to present such false or fraudulent claims, for payment by a federal program such as Medicare or Medicaid. If the government prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in any fines or settlement funds. Since 2004, these federal False Claims Act lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements regarding certain sales practices promoting off-label drug uses involving fines in excess of $1 billion. This growth in litigation has increased the risk that a pharmaceutical company will have to defend a false claim action, pay settlement fines or restitution, agree to comply with burdensome reporting and compliance obligations and be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. If we do not lawfully promote our approved products, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we do

~~Table of Contents~~

not successfully defend against such actions, those actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidate or any future product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

Risks Related to Healthcare Regulation

The advancement of healthcare reform may negatively impact our ability to profitably sell our product candidate or any future product candidates, if approved.

The United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of our product candidate or any future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell any product for which we obtain marketing approval. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements; (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling; (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products; or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements.

In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively, the Affordable Care Act or ACA, was enacted, which includes measures that have significantly changed the way health care is financed by both governmental and private insurers. Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Prior to the Supreme Court's decision, President Biden issued an Executive Order to initiate a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The Executive Order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. It is unclear how other healthcare reform measures of the Biden administrations or other efforts, if any, to challenge repeal or replace the ACA, will impact our business.

Table of Contents

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. In August 2011, President Obama signed into law the Budget Control Act of 2011, which, among other things, created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to recommend to Congress proposals in spending reductions. The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction did not achieve a targeted deficit reduction, which triggered the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of, on average, 2% per fiscal year through ~~2025~~2030 unless Congress takes additional action. These reductions were extended through 2030. Pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, and subsequent legislation, the 2% Medicare sequester reductions ~~have been~~were suspended from May 1, 2020 through ~~December~~March 31, ~~2021. Proposed legislation, if passed, would extend this~~2022. Following the temporary suspension, ~~until~~a 1% payment reduction is now in force effective April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, and the ~~end of the pandemic.~~2% payment reduction will resume on July 1, 2022. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. ~~Additionally,~~On April 13, 2017, CMS published a final rule that gives states greater flexibility in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces. In May 2019, CMS issued a final rule to allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy, a type of prior authorization, for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020. This final rule codified CMS’s policy change that was effective January 1, 2019. However, it is unclear whether the Biden administration will challenge, reverse, revoke or otherwise modify these executive and administrative actions after January 20, 2021. Additionally, on December 20, 2019, former President Trump signed into law the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 1865), which repealed the Cadillac tax, the health insurance provider tax, and the medical device excise tax. It is impossible to determine whether similar taxes could be instated in the future.

~~Table of Contents~~

There has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. Specifically, there have been several recent U.S. congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs under Medicare, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drugs. The former Trump administration’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2021 included a $135 billion allowance to support legislative proposals seeking to reduce drug prices, increase competition, lower out-of-pocket drug costs for patients, and increase patient access to lower-cost generic and biosimilar drugs.At athe federal level, the President Biden signed an Executive Order on July 9, 2021 affirming its policy (i) to support legislative reforms that would lower prescription drug prices, including by allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices and by imposing inflation caps; and (ii) to support the enactment of a public health insurance option. Among other things, the Executive Order also directs HHS to submit a report to combat excessive pricing of prescription drugs, to enhance the domestic drug supply chain, to reduce the price that the Federal government pays for drugs, and to address price gouging in the industry; and directs the FDA to work with states to develop prescription drug importation plans pursuant to the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and FDA’s related implementing regulations. The FDA released such implementing regulations on September 24, 2020, which went into effect on November 30, 2020, providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020 CMS issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the Most Favored Nation, or MFN, Model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates will be calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price drug manufacturers receive in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. The MFN Model regulations mandate participation by identified Part B providers and would have applied to all U.S. states and territories for a seven-year period beginning January 1, 2021, and ending December 31, 2027. However, in response to a lawsuit filed by several industry groups, on December 28, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining government defendants from implementing the MFN Rule pending completion of notice-and-comment procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act. On January 13, 2021, in a separate lawsuit brought by industry groups in the U.S. District of Maryland, the government defendants entered a joint motion to stay litigation on the condition that the government would not appeal the preliminary injunction granted in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and that performance for any final regulation stemming from the MFN Interim Final Rule shall not commence earlier than 60 days after publication of that regulation in the Federal Register. Further, authorities in Canada have passed rules designed to safeguard the Canadian drug supply from shortages. If implemented, importation of drugs from Canada and the MFN Model may materially and adversely affect the price we receive for any of our product candidates. Additionally, on December 2, 2020, HHS published a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. onOn December 2, 2020, HHS published a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either

Table of Contents

directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. .Pursuant to court order, the removal and addition of the aforementioned safe harbors were delayed and recent legislation imposed a moratorium on implementation of the rule until January 1, 2026. Further, implementation of this change and new safe harbors for point-of-sale reductions in price for prescription pharmaceutical products and pharmacy benefit manager service fees are currently under review by the Biden administration and may be amended or repealed. Although a number of these and other proposed measures may require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, and the Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, both the Biden administration and Congress have indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative measures to control drug ~~costs~~.costs. On July 9, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order directing the FDA to, among other things, continue to clarify and improve the approval framework for generic drugs and identify and address any efforts to impede generic drug competition.

In addition, there have been several changes to the 340B drug pricing program, which imposes ceilings on prices that certain drug and biologic manufacturers can charge for medications sold to certain health care facilities. It is unclear how these developments could affect covered hospitals who might purchase our future products and affect the rates we may charge such facilities for our approved products in the future, if any. On July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, former President Trump announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that seek to implement several of the former administration's proposals. In response, the FDA released a final rule on September 24,

~~Table of Contents~~

2020, which went into effect on November 30, 2020, providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020 CMS issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the Most Favored Nation, or MFN, Model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates will be calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price manufacturers receive in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. The MFN Model regulations mandate participation by identified Part B providers and would have applied to all U.S. states and territories for a seven-year period beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2027. However, in response to a lawsuit filed by several industry groups, on December 28, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining government defendants from implementing the MFN Rule pending completion of notice-and-comment procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act. On January 13, 2021, in a separate lawsuit brought by industry groups in the U.S. District of Maryland, the government defendants entered a joint motion to stay litigation on the condition that the government would not appeal the preliminary injunction granted in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and that performance for any final regulation stemming from the MFN Interim Final Rule shall not commence earlier than 60 days after publication of that regulation in the Federal Register. Further, authorities in Canada have passed rules designed to safeguard the Canadian drug supply from shortages. If implemented, importation of drugs from Canada and the MFN Model may materially and adversely affect the price we receive for any of our product candidates. Additionally, on December 2, 2020, HHS published a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. Pursuant to an order entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the portion of the rule eliminating safe harbor protection for certain rebates related to the sale or purchase of a pharmaceutical product from a manufacturer to a plan sponsor under Medicare Part D has been delayed to January 1, 2023. Further, implementation of this change and new safe harbors for point-of-sale reductions in price for prescription pharmaceutical products and pharmacy benefit manager service fees are currently under review by the Biden administration and may be amended or repealed.

Although a number of these, and other proposed measures may require additional authorization to become effective, and the Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, Congress has indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs. At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

We expect that the healthcare reform measures that have been adopted and may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product and could seriously harm our future revenues. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private third-party payors.

Additionally, in September 2020, the FDA issued a final guidance document outlining a pathway for manufacturers to obtain an additional National Drug Code, or NDC, for an FDA-approved drug that was originally intended to be marketed in a foreign country and that was authorized for sale in that foreign country. The regulatory and market implications of the draft guidance are unknown at this time. Proponents of drug reimportation may attempt to pass legislation that would directly allow reimportation under certain circumstances. Legislation or regulations allowing the reimportation of drugs, if enacted, could decrease the price we receive for any products that we may develop and adversely affect our future revenues and prospects for profitability.

Further, on May 30, 2018, the Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act of 2017, or the Right to Try Act, was signed into law. The law, among other things, provides a federal framework for certain patients to request access to certain investigational new drug products that have completed a Phase I clinical trial and that are undergoing investigation for FDA approval. Under certain circumstances, eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical trials and without obtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded access

~~Table of Contents~~

program. There is no obligation for a pharmaceutical manufacturer to make its drug products available to eligible patients as a result of the Right to Try Act.

There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our product. Such reforms could have an adverse effect on anticipated revenue from product candidates that we may successfully develop and for which we may obtain regulatory approval and may affect our overall financial condition and ability to develop product candidates.

Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our current and future arrangements with healthcare providers, third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through

Table of Contents

which we research, and if approved, market, sell and distribute our products. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:

●

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, the referral of an individual for the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing, or the purchase, lease or order, or arranging for or recommending purchase, lease or order, of any good or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid. On December 2, 2020, the Office of Inspector General, or OIG, published further modifications to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Under the final rules, OIG added safe harbor protections under the Anti-Kickback Statute for certain coordinated care and value-based arrangements among clinicians, providers, and others. This rule (with exceptions) became effective January 19, 2021. Implementation of this change and new safe harbors for point-of-sale reductions in price for prescription pharmaceutical products and pharmacy benefit manager service fees are currently under review by the Biden administration and may be amended or repealed. We continue to evaluate what effect, if any, the rule will have on our business;

●

~~federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which can be enforced through civil whistleblower or~~ ~~qui tam~~ actions, prohibit individuals or entities from, among other things knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government or a government contractor, grantee, or other recipient of federal funds, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;

●

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and their implementing regulations, imposes obligations on certain healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses, known as covered entities, as well as their business associates, which are individuals and entities that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information;

●

~~the federal Open Payments program, created under Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act and its implementing regulations, requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for~~

•

the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, the referral of an individual for the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing, or the purchase, lease or order, or arranging for or recommending purchase, lease or order, of any good or service for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid. A person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute or specific intent to violate it to have committed a violation. Violations are subject to civil and criminal fines and penalties for each violation, plus up to three times the remuneration involved, imprisonment, and exclusion from government healthcare programs. In addition, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act;

•

federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the federal False Claims Act, which can be enforced through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, prohibit individuals or entities from, among other things knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government or a government contractor, grantee, or other recipient of federal funds, claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government; knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false statement or record material to a false or fraudulent claim or obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government or knowingly concealing or knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money to the federal government. Manufacturers can be held liable under the federal False Claims Act even when they do not submit claims directly to government payors if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The federal False Claims Act also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act and to share in any monetary recovery;

•

the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, imposes criminal liability for knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense or knowingly and willfully making false statements relating to healthcare matters; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation;

•

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, and their implementing regulations, including the Final Omnibus Rule published in January 2013, imposes obligations on certain healthcare providers, health plans and healthcare clearinghouses, known as covered entities, as well as their business associates, which are individuals and entities that perform certain services involving the creation, maintenance, receipt, use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, including mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In addition, there may be additional federal, state and non-U.S. laws which govern the privacy and security of health and other personal information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts;

•

federal price reporting laws, which require manufacturers to calculate and report complex pricing metrics to government programs, where such reported prices may be used in the calculation of reimbursement and/or discounts on approved products;

•

federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers;

•

the federal Open Payments program, created under Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act and its implementing regulations, requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for

Table of Contents

which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to CMS information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians (as defined above) and their immediate family members. As of January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations have now extended to include transfers of value made to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners; and

which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (with certain exceptions) to report annually to CMS information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians (as defined above) and their immediate family members. Effective January 1, 2022, these reporting obligations will extend to include transfers of value made to certain non-physician providers such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners; and

●

•

analogous state, local, and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers; state and foreign laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; state and foreign laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers, marketing expenditures or drug prices; state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; several states also impose other marketing restrictions or require pharmaceutical companies to make marketing or price disclosures to the state and require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives. State and foreign laws, including for example the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, which became effective May 2018 also govern the privacy and security of health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts; and state and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, integrity oversight and reporting obligations, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, that person or entity may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.

Failure to comply with health and data protection laws and regulations could lead to government enforcement actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), private litigation, and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business.

We and any potential collaborators may be subject to federal, state, and foreign data protection laws and regulations (i.e., laws and regulations that address privacy and data security). In the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including federal health information privacy laws, state data breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws (e.g., Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”)), that govern the collection, use, disclosure and protection of health-related and other personal information could apply to our operations or the operations of our collaborators. The state of California, for example, recently adopted the CCPA, which went into effect beginning in January 2020. The CCPA has been characterized as the first “GDPR-like” privacy statute to be enacted in the United States because it mirrors a number of the key provisions of the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR (discussed below in the European Data Collection subsection). The CCPA establishes a new privacy framework for covered businesses by creating an expanded definition of personal information, establishing new data privacy rights for consumers in the State of California, imposing special rules on the collection of consumer data from minors, and creating a new and potentially severe statutory damages framework for violations of the CCPA and for businesses that fail to implement reasonable security procedures and practices to prevent data breaches. In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties (including research institutions from which we obtain clinical trial data) that are subject to privacy and security requirements under HIPAA, as amended by HITECH. While there is currently an exception for protected health information that is subject to HIPAA and clinical trial regulations, as currently written, the

Table of Contents

CCPA may impact some of our business activities. Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could be subject to civil, criminal, and administrative penalties if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA-covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by HIPAA.

~~Table~~Further, a new California privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, was passed by California voters on November 3, 2020. The CPRA will create additional obligations with respect to processing and storing personal information that are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2023 (with certain provisions having retroactive effect to January 1, 2022). Additionally, some observers have noted that the CCPA and CPRA could mark the beginning of ~~Contents~~a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the U.S., which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business. Already, in the United States, we have witnessed significant developments at the state level. For example, on March 2, 2021, Virginia enacted the Consumer Data Protection Act (the “CDPA”) and, on July 8, 2021, Colorado’s governor signed the Colorado Privacy Act (“CPA”), into law. The CDPA and the CPA will both become effective January 1, 2023. While the CDPA and CPA incorporate many similar concepts of the CCPA and CPRA, there are also several key differences in the scope, application, and enforcement of the law that will change the operational practices of regulated businesses. The new laws will, among other things, impact how regulated businesses collect and process personal sensitive data, conduct data protection assessments, transfer personal data to affiliates, and respond to consumer rights requests.

A number of other states have proposed new privacy laws, some of which are similar to the above discussed recently passed laws. Such proposed legislation, if enacted, may add additional complexity, variation in requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk, require additional investment of resources in compliance programs, impact strategies and the availability of previously useful data and could result in increased compliance costs and/or changes in business practices and policies. The existence of comprehensive privacy laws in different states in the country would make our compliance obligations more complex and costly and may increase the likelihood that we may be subject to enforcement actions or otherwise incur liability for noncompliance.

Compliance with U.S. and international data protection laws and regulations, including the EU GDPR and other EU data protection laws could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in some cases, impact our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions (which could include civil, criminal and administrative penalties), private litigation, and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business. Moreover, clinical trial subjects, employees and other individuals about whom we or our potential collaborators obtain personal information, as well as the providers who share this information with us, may limit our ability to collect, use and disclose the information. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights, failed to comply with data protection laws, or breached our contractual obligations, even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could harm our business.

In the event we decide to conduct clinical trials or continue to enroll subjects in our ongoing or future clinical trials, we may be subject to additional privacy restrictions. The collection, use, storage, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal data regarding individuals in the EU, including personal health data, is subject to the EU General Data Protection Regulation, which became effective on May 25, 2018. The GDPR is wide-ranging in scope and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process personal data, including requirements relating to processing health and other sensitive data, obtaining consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, providing information to individuals regarding data processing activities, implementing safeguards to protect the security and confidentiality of personal data, providing notification of data breaches, and taking certain measures when engaging third-party processors. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EU, including the United States, and permits data protection authorities to impose large penalties for violations of the GDPR, including potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is greater. The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR. In addition, the GDPR includes restrictions on cross-border data transfers. The GDPR may increase our responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process where such processing is subject to the GDPR, and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the GDPR, including as implemented by individual countries. Compliance with the GDPR will be a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business or require us to change our business practices, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connection with our European activities. ~~Further,~~

Table of Contents

In addition, further to the ~~United Kingdom’s~~U.K.’s exit from the EU ~~often referred~~on January 31, 2020, the GDPR ceased to apply in the U.K. at the end of the transition period on December 31, 2020. However, as ~~Brexit, has created uncertainty with regard to~~of January 1, 2021, the U.K.’s European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 incorporated the U.K. GDPR into U.K. law. The U.K. GDPR and the U.K. Data Protection Act 2018 set out the U.K.’s data protection ~~regulation~~regime, which is independent from but aligned to the EU’s data protection regime. Non-compliance with the U.K. GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. Although the UK is regarded as a third country under the EU’s GDPR, the European Commission (“EC”) has now issued a decision recognizing the UK as providing adequate protection under the EU GDPR and, therefore, transfers of personal data originating in the ~~United Kingdom. In particular, it is unclear how~~EU to the UK remain unrestricted. Like the EU GDPR, the UK GDPR restricts personal data transfers outside the UK to ~~and~~countries not regarded by the UK as providing adequate protection. The UK government has confirmed that personal data transfers from the ~~United Kingdom~~UK to the EEA remain free flowing.

To enable the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA or the UK, adequate safeguards must be implemented in compliance with European and UK data protection laws. On June 4, 2021, the EC issued new forms of standard contractual clauses for data transfers from controllers or processors in the EU/EEA (or otherwise subject to the GDPR) to controllers or processors established outside the EU/EEA (and not subject to the GDPR). The new standard contractual clauses replace the standard contractual clauses that were adopted previously under the EU Data Protection Directive. The UK is not subject to the EC’s new standard contractual clauses but has published a draft version of a UK-specific transfer mechanism, which, once finalized, will enable transfers from the UK. We will be ~~regulated now~~required to implement these new safeguards when conducting restricted data transfers under the EU and UK GDPR and doing so will require significant effort and cost.

Compliance with these and any other applicable privacy and data security laws and regulations is a rigorous and time-intensive process, and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms ensuring compliance with the new data protection rules. If we fail to comply with any such laws or regulations, we may face significant fines and penalties that ~~the United Kingdom has officially left the EU.~~could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls, which may adversely affect our revenue, if any.

In some countries, particularly the countries of the European Union, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of marketing approval for a drug. In addition, there can be considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures. Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations. To obtain coverage and reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our drug candidate to other available procedures. If reimbursement of our drugs is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business could be harmed, possibly materially.

Healthcare insurance coverage and reimbursement may be limited or unavailable for our product candidate, if approved, which could make it difficult for us to sell our product candidate or other therapies profitably.

The success of our product candidate, if approved, depends on the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors including governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial payors, and health maintenance organizations. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for, or accurately estimate the potential revenue from, our product candidates or assure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that we may develop.

~~Table of Contents~~

Patients who are provided medical treatment for their conditions generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their treatment. Coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors are critical to new product acceptance.

Table of Contents

Third-party payors decide which drugs and treatments they will cover and the amount of reimbursement. Coverage and reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payor’s determination that use of a product is:

●

~~a covered benefit under its health plan;~~

●

~~safe, effective and medically necessary;~~

●

~~appropriate for the specific patient;~~

●

~~cost-effective; and~~

●

~~neither experimental nor investigational.~~

•

a covered benefit under its health plan;

•

safe, effective and medically necessary;

•

appropriate for the specific patient;

•

cost-effective; and

•

neither experimental nor investigational.

In the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-party payors. As a result, obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval of a product from a third-party payor is a time consuming and costly process that could require us to provide to each payor supporting scientific, clinical and cost effectiveness data for the use of our products on a payor-by-payor basis, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained. There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by CMS, an agency within HHS, as CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare. Private third-party payors tend to follow Medicare coverage and reimbursement limitations to a substantial degree, but also have their own methods and approval process apart from Medicare determinations. Even if we obtain coverage for a given product, the resulting reimbursement payment rates might not be adequate for us to achieve or sustain profitability or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high.

Net prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States.

Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for any product candidate that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement.

In addition, many pharmaceutical manufacturers must calculate and report certain price reporting metrics to the government, such as average sales price, or ASP, and best price. Penalties may apply in some cases when such metrics are not submitted accurately and timely. Further, these prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs.

Our activities in the United States subject us to various laws relating to foreign investment and the export of certain technologies, and our failure to comply with these laws or adequately monitor the compliance of our suppliers and others we do business with could subject us to substantial fines, penalties and even injunctions, the imposition of which on us could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Because we have substantial operations in the United States, we are subject to U.S. laws that regulate foreign investments in U.S. businesses and access by foreign persons to technology developed and produced in the United States. These laws include Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended by the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018, and the regulations at 31 C.F.R. Parts 800 and 801, as amended, administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States; and the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, which is being implemented in part through Commerce Department rulemakings to impose new export control restrictions on “emerging and foundational technologies” yet to be fully identified. Application of these laws, including as they are implemented through regulations being developed, may negatively impact our business in various ways, including by restricting our access to capital and markets; limiting the collaborations we may pursue; regulating the export our products, services, and technology from the United States and abroad; increasing our costs and the time necessary to obtain required authorizations and to ensure compliance; and threatening monetary fines and other penalties if we do not.

Table of Contents

We are subject to U.S. and certain foreign export and import controls, sanctions, embargoes, anti-corruption laws, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Compliance with these legal standards could impair our ability to compete in domestic and international markets. We can face criminal liability and other serious consequences for violations, which can harm our business.

We are subject to export control and import laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations, various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and other state and national anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we conduct activities.

~~Table of Contents~~

Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit companies and their employees, agents, contractors, and other collaborators from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or anything else of value to recipients in the public or private sector. We may engage third parties to sell our products sell our products outside the United States, to conduct clinical trials, and/or to obtain necessary permits, licenses, patent registrations, and other regulatory approvals. We have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or government-affiliated hospitals, universities, and other organizations. We can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of our employees, agents, contractors, and other collaborators, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. Any violations of the laws and regulations described above may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties, imprisonment, the loss of export or import privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm, and other consequences.

Changes in funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new or existing product candidates from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years, the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other government employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, in our operations as a public company, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Need for Additional Capital

We have incurred significant losses since our inception and we expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue to date, and we continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not profitable and have incurred significant losses in each period since our inception in January 2017. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, we reported net losses of $26.0 million and $15.1 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we reported net losses of ~~$68.4~~$100.8 million and ~~$49.5 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we reported net losses of~~ $79.2 ~~million and $43.8~~ million, respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of ~~$277.9~~$336.3 million. We expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase as we continue our research and development of, and seek regulatory approvals for, our product candidate. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if, and as, we:

●

•

conduct larger scale clinical trials for our product candidate, EFX, and any future product candidates;

●

~~discover and develop new product candidates, and conduct nonclinical studies and clinical trials;~~

●

~~incur setbacks or delays to the initiation or completion of preclinical and non-clinical studies, product development and/or clinical trials due to the COVID-19 pandemic;~~

●

~~incur any disruption or delays to the supply of our product candidate due to the COVID-19 pandemic;~~

•

discover and develop new product candidates, and conduct nonclinical studies and clinical trials;

•

~~Table~~incur setbacks or delays to the initiation or completion of ~~Contents~~

preclinical and non-clinical studies, product development and/or clinical trials due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

●

~~manufacture, or have manufactured, clinical and commercial supplies of our product candidates;~~

●

~~seek regulatory approvals for EFX or any future product candidates;~~

●

~~commercialize EFX or any future product candidates, if approved;~~

●

~~attempt to transition from a company with a development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities, including establishing sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure;~~

●

~~hire additional clinical, scientific, and management personnel;~~

●

~~add operational, financial, and management information systems and personnel;~~

●

~~identify additional compounds or product candidates and acquire rights from third parties to those compounds or product candidates through licenses; and~~

●

~~incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.~~

•

incur any disruption or delays to the supply of our product candidate due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

•

manufacture, or have manufactured, clinical and commercial supplies of our product candidates;

•

seek regulatory approvals for EFX or any future product candidates;

•

commercialize EFX or any future product candidates, if approved;

•

attempt to transition from a company with a development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities, including establishing sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure;

•

hire additional clinical, scientific, and management personnel;

•

add operational, financial, and management information systems and personnel;

•

identify additional compounds or product candidates and acquire rights from third parties to those compounds or product candidates through licenses; and

•

incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.

Even if we succeed in commercializing EFX or any future product candidates, we may continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenditures to develop and market additional product candidates. We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our business. The size of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our expenses and our ability to generate revenue. Our prior losses and expected future losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital.

We currently have a limited operating history, have not generated any revenue to date, and may never become profitable.

We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company with a limited operating history. Our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, acquiring, developing and securing our technology and product candidate, EFX, and conducting nonclinical studies and clinical trials of EFX. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to complete late-stage clinical trials, obtain regulatory approval, formulate and manufacture a commercial-scale product, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Investment in biotechnology product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront expenditures in clinical research organizations and contract manufacturing organizations and significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. Consequently, any predictions you may make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

Though EFX is currently in Phase 2 clinical development, we do not expect to receive revenue from EFX for a number of years, if ever. To date, we have not generated any revenue and we will not be able to generate product revenue unless and until EFX, or any future product candidate, successfully completes clinical trials, receives regulatory approval, and is commercialized. We may seek to obtain revenue from collaboration or licensing agreements with third

Table of Contents

parties. Our ability to generate future product revenue from EFX or any future product candidates also depends on a number of additional factors, including our, or our current and future contractors’ and collaborators’, ability to:

●

•

successfully complete nonclinical studies and clinical trials for EFX and any future product candidates;

●

~~seek and obtain marketing approvals for any product candidates that complete clinical development;~~

●

establish and maintain supply and manufacturing relationships with third parties, and ensure adequate and legally compliant manufacturing of bulk drug substances and drug products to maintain that supply;

●

~~launch and commercialize any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval, and, if launched independently, successfully establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure;~~

●

~~demonstrate the necessary safety data post-approval to ensure continued regulatory approval;~~

●

~~obtain coverage and adequate product reimbursement from third-party payors, including government payors;~~

●

~~achieve market acceptance for any approved products;~~

●

~~address any competing technological and market developments;~~

●

~~maintain our rights under our existing license agreement with Amgen and any similar agreements we may enter into in the future;~~

•

seek and obtain marketing approvals for any product candidates that complete clinical development;

•

~~Table~~establish and maintain supply and manufacturing relationships with third parties, and ensure adequate and legally compliant manufacturing of ~~Contents~~

bulk drug substances and drug products to maintain that supply;

●

~~negotiate favorable terms in any collaboration, licensing or other arrangements into which we may enter in the future and performing our obligations in such collaborations;~~

●

~~establish, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights; and~~

●

~~attract, hire and retain qualified personnel.~~

•

launch and commercialize any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval, and, if launched independently, successfully establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure;

•

demonstrate the necessary safety data post-approval to ensure continued regulatory approval;

•

obtain coverage and adequate product reimbursement from third-party payors, including government payors;

•

achieve market acceptance for any approved products;

•

address any competing technological and market developments;

•

maintain our rights under our existing license agreement with Amgen and any similar agreements we may enter into in the future;

•

negotiate favorable terms in any collaboration, licensing or other arrangements into which we may enter in the future and performing our obligations in such collaborations;

•

establish, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights; and

•

attract, hire and retain qualified personnel.

In addition, because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with biotechnology product development, including that our product candidate may not advance through development or achieve the endpoints of applicable clinical trials, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses, or if or when we will achieve or maintain profitability. In addition, our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we decide, or are required by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, to perform nonclinical studies or clinical trials in addition to those that we currently anticipate. Even if we complete the development and regulatory processes described above, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with launching and commercializing any approved product.

If we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company also could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

As a research and development company, our operations have consumed substantial amounts of cash since inception. We expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance EFX into later-stage clinical development.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had ~~$215.1~~$165.4 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities. We raised $95.5 million from our initial public offering in June 2019 and $202.6 million from our follow-on public offering in July 2020. Any forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will adequately support our operations is a forward-looking statement and involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary as a result of a number of factors, including the factors discussed elsewhere in this ~~‘‘Risk factors’’~~"Risk Factors" section. The assumptions underlying any estimate may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future funding requirements, both short and long-term, will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

●

•

the initiation, progress, timing, costs and results of nonclinical studies and clinical trials for our product candidate or any future product candidates we may develop, including on account of any setbacks or delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

●

the cost and timing of manufacturing our product candidate for use in clinical trials or, if approved by the FDA, for commercial use, including on account of any disruption or delays to the supply of our product candidate due to the COVID-19 pandemic;

●

~~our ability to maintain our license to EFX from Amgen;~~

●

~~the effect of competing technological and market developments;~~

●

~~market acceptance of any approved product candidates, including product pricing, as well as product coverage and the adequacy of reimbursement by third-party payors;~~

Table of Contents

•

●

~~the cost of acquiring, licensing or investing in additional businesses, products, product candidates and technologies;~~

●

~~the cost and timing of selecting, auditing and potentially validating a manufacturing site for commercial scale manufacturing;~~

●

~~the cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for any product candidates for which we may receive regulatory approval and that we determine to commercialize; and~~

●

~~our need to implement additional internal systems and infrastructure, including financial and reporting systems.~~

•

our ability to maintain our license to EFX from Amgen;

•

the effect of competing technological and market developments;

•

market acceptance of any approved product candidates, including product pricing, as well as product coverage and the adequacy of reimbursement by third-party payors;

•

the cost of acquiring, licensing or investing in additional businesses, products, product candidates and technologies;

•

the cost and timing of selecting, auditing and potentially validating a manufacturing site for commercial scale manufacturing;

•

the cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities for any product candidates for which we may receive regulatory approval and that we determine to commercialize; and

•

our need to implement additional internal systems and infrastructure, including financial and reporting systems.

We do not have any committed external source of funds or other support for our development efforts and we cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Until we can generate sufficient revenue to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we expect to finance our future cash needs through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements, and other marketing or distribution arrangements. If we raise additional funds through public or private equity offerings, the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect our stockholders’ rights. Further, to the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, your ownership interest will be diluted. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we could be subject to fixed payment obligations and may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional capital through marketing and distribution arrangements or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish certain valuable rights to our product candidates, technologies, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. We also could be required to seek collaborators for one or more of our current or any future product candidates at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable or relinquish our rights to product candidates or technologies that we otherwise would seek to develop or commercialize ourselves. If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of one or more of our products or product candidates or one or more of our other research and development initiatives. Any of the above events could significantly harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Risks Related to Commercialization and Market Acceptance

Risks Related to Commercialization

Even if we commercialize EFX or any future product candidates, if approved, these products may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement practices or healthcare reform initiatives, which could harm our business.

The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from country to country. Current and future legislation may significantly change the approval requirements in ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. Some countries require approval of the sale price

Table of Contents

of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay or limit our commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, which could negatively impact the revenue we generate from the sale of the product in that particular country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidate or any future product candidates obtain marketing approval.

Our ability to commercialize any products successfully also will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from third-party payors such as government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Third-party payors determine which medications they will cover and establish reimbursement levels. Third-party payors have attempted to

~~Table of Contents~~

control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Coverage and reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval, if any. If coverage and reimbursement are not available or reimbursement is available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidate for which marketing approval is obtained, if any.

There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage and reimbursement for newly approved drugs, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Moreover, eligibility for coverage and reimbursement does not imply that a drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may only be temporary. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable reimbursement rates third-party payors for any approved products that we develop could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.

Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.

We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidate or any future product candidates in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercialize any resulting products. Product liability claims may be brought against us by subjects enrolled in our clinical trials, patients, their family members, healthcare providers or others using, administering or selling our products. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidate or any future product candidates or products that we may develop caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

●

~~decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we may develop;~~

●

~~termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;~~

●

~~injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention;~~

●

~~withdrawal of clinical trial participants;~~

●

~~significant costs to defend the related litigation;~~

●

~~substantial monetary awards to trial subjects or patients;~~

●

~~loss of revenue;~~

●

~~diversion of management and scientific resources from our business operations;~~

●

~~the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop; and~~

●

~~a decline in our stock price.~~

•

decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we may develop;

•

termination of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

•

injury to our reputation and significant negative media attention;

•

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

•

significant costs to defend the related litigation;

•

substantial monetary awards to trial subjects or patients;

•

loss of revenue;

•

diversion of management and scientific resources from our business operations;

•

the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop; and

•

a decline in our stock price.

Table of Contents

Our clinical trial liability insurance coverage may not adequately cover all liabilities that we may incur. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. Our inability to obtain product liability insurance at an acceptable cost or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or delay the commercialization of any products or product candidates that we develop. We intend to expand our insurance coverage for products to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidate or any future product candidates in development, but we may be unable to obtain commercially reasonable product liability insurance for any products approved for marketing. Large judgments have been awarded in lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. If we are sued for any

~~Table of Contents~~

injury caused by our products, product candidates or processes, our liability could exceed our product liability insurance coverage and our total assets. Claims against us, regardless of their merit or potential outcome, may also generate negative publicity or hurt our ability to obtain physician adoption of our product or expand our business.

Risks Related to Market Acceptance

If, in the future, we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market any product candidates we may develop, we may not be successful in commercializing those product candidates if and when they are approved.

We do not currently have an infrastructure for the sales, marketing, and distribution of pharmaceutical products. In order to market our product candidates, if approved by the FDA or any other regulatory body, we must build our sales, marketing, managerial, and other non-technical capabilities, or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services. There are risks involved with both establishing our own commercial capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a sales force or reimbursement specialists is expensive and time-consuming and could delay any product launch. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing and other commercialization capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our commercialization personnel.

If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing, commercial support, and distribution services, our product revenue or the profitability of product revenue may be lower than if we were to market and sell any products we may develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to commercialize our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We may have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively and they could expose our company to regulatory enforcement and legal risk in the execution of their sales and commercialization activities. If we do not establish commercialization capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates if approved.

If we are unable to establish adequate sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, whether independently or with third parties, or if we are unable to do so on commercially reasonable terms, our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects will be materially adversely affected.

Our product candidate or any future product candidates may not achieve adequate market acceptance among physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.

Even if our product candidate or any future product candidates receive regulatory approval, they may not gain adequate market acceptance among physicians, patients, third-party payors, pharmaceutical companies and others in the medical community. Demonstrating the safety and efficacy of our product candidate or any future product candidates and obtaining regulatory approvals will not guarantee future revenue. Our commercial success also depends on coverage and adequate reimbursement of our product candidate or any future product candidates by third-party payors, including government payors and private insurers, which may be difficult or time-consuming to obtain, may be limited in scope and may not be obtained in all jurisdictions in which we may seek to market our products. Third-party payors closely examine medical products to determine whether they should be covered by reimbursement and, if so, the level of

Table of Contents

reimbursement that will apply. We cannot be certain that third-party payors will sufficiently reimburse sales of our product or enable us to sell our product at a profitable price. Similar concerns could also limit the reimbursement amounts that health insurers or government agencies in other countries are prepared to pay for our products. In many regions, including Europe, Japan and Canada, where we may market our products, the pricing of prescription drugs is controlled by the government or regulatory agencies. Regulatory agencies in these countries could determine that the pricing for our products should be based on prices of other commercially available drugs for the same disease, rather

~~Table of Contents~~

than allowing us to market our products at a premium as new drugs. The degree of market acceptance of any of our approved product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including:

●

~~the efficacy and safety profile of the product candidate as demonstrated in clinical trials;~~

●

~~the timing of market introduction of the product candidate as well as competitive products;~~

●

~~any impact to market health as a result of COVID-19;~~

●

~~the clinical indications for which the product candidate is approved;~~

●

~~acceptance of the product candidate as a safe and effective treatment by clinics and patients;~~

●

~~the potential and perceived advantages of the product candidate over alternative treatments, including any similar generic treatments;~~

●

~~the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;~~

●

~~the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement and pricing by third-party payors;~~

●

~~the relative convenience and ease of administration;~~

●

~~the frequency and severity of adverse events;~~

●

~~the effectiveness of sales and marketing efforts; and~~

●

~~unfavorable publicity relating to our product candidate or any future product candidates.~~

•

the efficacy and safety profile of the product candidate as demonstrated in clinical trials;

•

the timing of market introduction of the product candidate as well as competitive products;

•

any impact to market health as a result of COVID-19;

•

the clinical indications for which the product candidate is approved;

•

acceptance of the product candidate as a safe and effective treatment by clinics and patients;

•

the potential and perceived advantages of the product candidate over alternative treatments, including any similar generic treatments;

•

the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments;

•

the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement and pricing by third-party payors;

•

the relative convenience and ease of administration;

•

the frequency and severity of adverse events;

•

the effectiveness of sales and marketing efforts; and

•

unfavorable publicity relating to our product candidate or any future product candidates.

Sales of medical products also depend on the willingness of physicians to prescribe the treatment, which is likely to be based on a determination by these physicians that the products are safe, therapeutically effective and cost effective. In addition, the inclusion or exclusion of products from treatment guidelines established by various physician groups and the viewpoints of influential physicians can affect the willingness of other physicians to prescribe the treatment. We cannot predict whether physicians, physicians’ organizations, hospitals, other healthcare providers, government agencies or private insurers will determine that our product is safe, therapeutically effective and cost effective as compared with competing treatments. If any product candidate is approved but does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by such parties, we may not generate or derive sufficient revenue from that product candidate and may not become or remain profitable.

Risks Related to Our Operations

We incur significant costs and expend significant time and effort, as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses, and expend significant time and effort by management and other personnel, to comply with the rules applicable to us as a public company. We are subject to the reporting requirements of Nasdaq and of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which require, among other things, that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition and that we establish and maintain effective disclosure controls, procedures and corporate governance practices. We must also comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), and specifically Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley ~~Act, which requires that we establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting. In order to maintain compliance with the SEC’s rules that implement~~Act. Section 404 ~~of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required~~generally requires our management and independent registered public accounting firm to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and to provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting ~~which includes the disclosure of any material weaknesses~~ and ~~associated remediation activities. When we are no longer~~requires us to include an ~~emerging growth company, we will incur additional costs to meet the requirement to provide an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting~~opinion from our independent registered public accounting ~~firm.~~firm on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses, and expend significant time and effort by management and other personnel, to comply with the rules applicable to us as a public company and we will continue to need to ~~continue to dedicate significant internal resources and outside consultants in order to complete management’s annual assessment and to prepare for when we are no longer an emerging growth company.~~do so. Despite these efforts, there is no guarantee that we will be able to conclude that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective.

Further, in July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation related provisions in the ~~Dodd-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Frank~~Dodd-Frank Act that require the SEC to adopt additional rules and regulations in these areas, such as “say on pay” and proxy ~~access. Recent legislation permits emerging growth companies to implement many~~

Table of these requirements over a longer period and up to five years from the pricing of our IPO. We intend to take advantage of this new legislation but cannot guarantee that we will not be required to implement these requirements sooner than budgeted or planned and thereby incur unexpected expenses.Contents

access. Stockholder activism, the current political environment, and the current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, which may lead to additional compliance costs and impact the manner in which we operate our business in ways we cannot currently anticipate.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the purpose of providing the reports required by Section 404. Based on our assessment and using the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO, criteria, our management, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have concluded that, as of March 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. As required under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, we are required to have our independent registered public accounting firm attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. During the course of our or their subsequent review and testing, however, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may be identified, and we may be unable to remediate them before we must provide the required reports. If material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are identified in the future, we may not detect or remediate errors on a timely basis and our consolidated financial statements may be materially misstated. We or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, which could harm our operating results, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and cause the trading price of our stock to fall. In addition, any failure to report our financial results on an accurate and timely basis could result in sanctions, lawsuits, delisting of our shares from NASDAQ or other adverse consequences that would materially harm our business.

We expect the rules and regulations applicable to public companies to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. If these requirements divert the attention of our management and personnel from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The increased costs will decrease our net income or increase our net loss and may require us to reduce costs in other areas of our business or increase the prices of our products or services. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain ~~qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees, or as executive officers.~~

When we lose our status as an ‘‘emerging growth company,’’ as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended, or the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls could detect problems that our management’s assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial statement restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.

We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenue; (ii) the date we qualify as a large accelerated filer, with at least $700 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates; (iii) the date on which we have, in any three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities; and (iv) December 31, 2024 (the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our IPO). On the last business day of our second quarter in 2021, the aggregate market value of our shares held by non-affiliate stockholders exceeded $700 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2021, we will be considered a large accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, and we will cease to be an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. We will no longer be exempt from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and our independent registered public accounting firm will evaluate and report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. We will also no longer be permitted to take advantage of reduced reporting requirements for smaller reporting companies. We expect to incur significant costs as a result of complying with additional compliance and reporting requirements, and our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with additional reporting requirements. Such initiatives and requirements will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. Any changes we make to comply with these obligations may not be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations as a public company on a timely basis, or at all.

If we fail to comply with these rules, including maintaining proper and effective systems of internal controls over financial reporting, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting may be adversely affected, and we could be subject to sanctions or other penalties that would harm our business.

Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate consolidated financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. If we identify any material weakness or significant deficiency, the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting may be adversely affected, we may be unable to maintain

~~Table of Contents~~

compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting, and our stock price may decline as a result. We also could become subject to investigations by Nasdaq, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, or other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, or to implement or maintain other effective control systems required of public companies, could also restrict our future access to the capital markets. In addition, investors’ perceptions that our internal controls are inadequate or that we are unable to produce accurate consolidated financial statements on a timely basis may harm our stock price and make it more difficult for us to effectively market and sell our products to new and existing customers.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyber-attacks or deficiencies in our or related parties’ cyber security.

Given our limited operating history, we are still in the process of implementing our internal security measures. Our internal computer systems and those of current and future third parties on which we rely may fail and are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses and unauthorized access. Our information technology and other internal infrastructure

Table of Contents

systems, including corporate firewalls, servers, leased lines and connection to the Internet, face the risk of systemic failure that could disrupt our operations. While we have not, to our knowledge, experienced any such material system failure or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in in:

•

delays in our regulatory approval ~~efforts~~efforts;

•

remediation costs, such as liability for stolen assets or information, repairs of system damage, and incentives to business partners in an effort to maintain relationships after an attack;

•

increased cybersecurity protection costs, which may include the costs of making organizational changes, deploying additional personnel and protection technologies, training employees, and engaging third party experts and consultants;

•

increased insurance premiums;

•

reputational damage that adversely affects customer or investor confidence;

•

damage to the company’s competitiveness, stock price, and long-term shareholder value; and

•

significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data.

Likewise, we currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidate or any future product candidates and to conduct clinical trials, and similar events relating to their computer systems could also have a material adverse effect on our business. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability, our competitive position could be harmed and the further development and commercialization of our product candidate or any future product candidates could be hindered or delayed.

We use and generate materials that may expose us to material liability.

Our research programs involve the use of hazardous materials and chemicals, which are currently only handled by third parties. We are subject to foreign, federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other matters, the use, manufacture, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products. We may incur significant costs to comply with these current or future environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. In addition, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from hazardous materials and may incur material liability as a result of such contamination or injury. In the event of an accident, an injured party may seek to hold us liable for any damages that result. Any liability could exceed the limits or fall outside the coverage of our workers’ compensation, property and business interruption insurance and we may not be able to maintain insurance on acceptable terms, if at all. We currently carry no insurance specifically covering environmental claims.

Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Our business could be adversely affected by the effects of health epidemics, ~~including~~and has been impacted by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, in regions where we, or third parties on which we rely, have significant manufacturing, analytical laboratory and transportation facilities, concentrations of clinical trial sites or other business operations. The COVID-19 pandemic and any current or new variants of the virus could materially affect our operations, including at our headquarters in the San Francisco Bay Area, and at our clinical trial sites, as well as the business or operations of our manufacturers, CROs or other third parties with whom we conduct business.

Our business could be adversely affected by health epidemics in regions where we have concentrations of clinical trial sites or other business operations, and could cause significant disruption in the operations of third-party manufacturers and CROs upon whom we rely. For example, in December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, causing a disease referred to as COVID-19, was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. Since then,

~~Table of Contents~~

COVID-19 has continued to spread ~~to multiple countries,~~globally, including in all 50 states within the United ~~States and several European countries.~~States. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, and the U.S. government-imposed travel restrictions on travel between the United States, Europe and certain other countries. We have instituted work-from-home policies for all of our employees.While vaccinations beginning in 2021 allowed for the partial reopening of the economy, new variants, including the recent “Omicron” variant of the virus and associated sub-variants, as well as reduced efficacy of vaccines over time and the possibility that a large number of people decline to get vaccinated or receive booster shots, creates

Table of Contents

inherent uncertainty as to the future of our business, our industry and the economy in general in light of the pandemic. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, three vaccines for COVID-19 have received Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA and two of those later received marketing approval. Additional vaccines may be authorized or approved in the future. The resultant demand for vaccines and potential for manufacturing facilities and materials to be commandeered under the Defense Production Act of 1950, or equivalent foreign legislation, may make it more difficult to obtain materials or manufacturing slots for the products needed for our clinical trials, which could lead to delays in these trials. The effects of our work-from-home policies may negatively impact productivity, disrupt our business and delay our clinical programs and timelines, the magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and other limitations on our ability to conduct our business in the ordinary course. The extent to which the ~~coronavirus~~COVID-19 pandemic impacts our operations or those of our third-party partners will depend on future developments, which ~~despite progress in vaccination efforts,~~ remain highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the ~~outbreak,~~current Omicron variant, new ~~information that will emerge, new strains~~variants and sub-variants of the virus which may impact vaccination efforts, mask and vaccine mandates, travel restrictions, and social distancing in the United States and other countries, business closures or business disruptions and the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments take to contain the ~~coronavirus~~COVID-19 pandemic or treat its impact, among ~~others.~~others

Additionally, timely enrollment in planned clinical trials is dependent upon clinical trial sites which will be adversely affected by global health matters, such as pandemics. We are conducting clinical trials for our product candidates in geographies which ~~are currently being~~continue to be affected by the ~~coronavirus.~~COVID-19 pandemic. Some factors from the ~~coronavirus outbreak~~ongoing COVID-19 pandemic that will delay or otherwise adversely affect enrollment in the clinical trials of our product candidates, as well as our business generally, include:

●

the diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials to focus on pandemic concerns, including the attention of physicians serving as our clinical trial investigators, hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our prospective clinical trials;

●

limitations on travel that could interrupt key trial and business activities, such as clinical trial site initiations and monitoring, domestic and international travel by employees, contractors or patients to clinical trial sites, including any government-imposed travel restrictions or quarantines that will impact the ability or willingness of patients, employees or contractors to travel to our clinical trial sites or secure visas or entry permissions, a loss of face-to-face meetings and other interactions with potential partners, any of which could delay or adversely impact the conduct or progress of our prospective clinical trials;

●

interruption in global shipping affecting the transport of clinical trial materials, such as patient samples, investigational drug product and conditioning drugs and other supplies used in our prospective clinical trials;

●

business disruptions caused by potential workplace, laboratory and office closures and an increased reliance on employees working from home, disruptions to or delays in ongoing laboratory experiments and operations, product manufacturing and supply, staffing shortages, travel limitations or mass transit disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our business operations or delay necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees and other important agencies and contractors that enrolled participants will drop out before completion; and

●

~~the FDA and other regulators have made COVID-19 a primary priority, which can result in delays for trials unrelated to the pandemic.~~

•

the FDA and other regulators have made COVID-19 a primary priority, which can result in delays for trials unrelated to the pandemic.

Moreover, COVID-19 may also severely affect employees of third-party CROs located in affected geographies that we rely upon to carry out such enrollments and trials. Such events could cause costly delays to our clinical trial activities, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and to commercialize our product candidates, increase our operating expenses, and have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

These and other factors arising from the ~~coronavirus~~ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could worsen ~~in countries that are already afflicted with~~as the ~~coronavirus or could continue~~pandemic continues to ~~spread to additional countries.~~evolve. Any of these factors, and other factors related to any ~~such~~unforeseen disruptions, ~~that are unforeseen,~~have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operation and financial condition. Further, uncertainty around these and related issues has severely harmed and is expected to continue to severely harm the economy of the United States, which could impact our ability to raise the necessary capital needed to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

Table of Contents

General Risk Factors

Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by economic and political changes in the location in which we, or our suppliers and vendors, maintain operations. For example, our business may be generally exposed to the impact of political or civil unrest or military action, including the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and, while we do not have direct exposure to Ukraine, we do have third-party manufacturing partners with locations in Europe. The activities of such manufacturing partners may be impacted based upon the events taking place there. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.

We are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies no longer apply to us.

As of June 30, 2021, the market value of our common stock that was held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million, and as a result, as of December 31, 2021, we no longer qualified as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. As such, we will incur significant additional expenses that we did not previously incur in complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules implemented by the SEC. As a large accelerated filer, we are now subject to certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that were not applicable to us as an emerging growth company. These requirements include:

•

compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404;

•

compliance with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements;

•

full disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and

•

compliance with the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

If we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources. Additionally, we expect that our loss of “emerging growth company” status will require additional attention from management and will result in increased costs to us, which could include higher legal fees, accounting fees and fees associated with investor relations activities, among others.

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Securities

The market price of our stock may be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which we cannot control. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, our stock price has ranged from $12.97 to $22.26. In addition to the factors discussed in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, these factors include:

●

~~developments associated with our license with Amgen, including any termination or other change in our relationship with Amgen;~~

●

~~the success of competitive products or technologies;~~

●

~~regulatory actions with respect to our product candidate or any future product candidates or our competitors’ product candidates or products;~~

●

~~results of clinical trials of our product candidate or any future product candidates or those of our competitors;~~

●

~~actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate relative to our competitors;~~

●

~~announcements by us or our competitors or collaborators of significant acquisitions, strategic collaborations, joint ventures, collaborations or capital commitments;~~

●

~~regulatory, legal or payor developments in the United States and other countries;~~

●

~~developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights;~~

●

~~the recruitment or departure of key personnel;~~

●

~~the level of expenses related to any of our product candidate or any future product candidates or clinical development programs;~~

●

~~the results of our efforts to in-license or acquire additional product candidates or products;~~

●

~~actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts;~~

●

~~variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;~~

●

~~fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;~~

●

~~share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares;~~

●

~~announcement or expectation of additional financing efforts;~~

●

~~sales of our common stock by us, our insiders or our other stockholders;~~

●

~~changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;~~

●

~~general economic, industry and market conditions, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;~~

●

~~market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors; and~~

●

~~general economic, industry and market conditions.~~

•

developments associated with our license with Amgen, including any termination or other change in our relationship with Amgen;

•

the success of competitive products or technologies;

•

regulatory actions with respect to our product candidate or any future product candidates or our competitors’ product candidates or products;

•

results of clinical trials of our product candidate or any future product candidates or those of our competitors;

•

actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate relative to our competitors;

Table of Contents

•

announcements by us or our competitors or collaborators of significant acquisitions, strategic collaborations, joint ventures, collaborations or capital commitments;

•

regulatory, legal or payor developments in the United States and other countries;

•

developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights;

•

the recruitment or departure of key personnel;

•

the level of expenses related to any of our product candidate or any future product candidates or clinical development programs;

•

the results of our efforts to in-license or acquire additional product candidates or products;

•

actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts;

•

variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

•

fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;

•

share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares;

•

announcement or expectation of additional financing efforts;

•

sales of our common stock by us, our insiders or our other stockholders;

•

changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems;

•

general economic, industry and market conditions, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;

•

production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad (such as the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, including the sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union and others on Russia and other related parties);

•

market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors; and

•

general economic, industry and market conditions.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for biotechnology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies, including very recently in connection with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has resulted in decreased stock prices for many companies notwithstanding the lack of a fundamental change in their underlying business models or prospects. Although the markets recovered, market and industry factors, including potentially worsening economic conditions and other adverse effects or developments relating to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, may significantly reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The realization of any of the above risks or any of a broad range of other risks, including those described in this “Risk Factors” section, could have a dramatic and material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock.

~~Table of Contents~~

Because of potential volatility in our trading price and trading volume, we may incur significant costs from class action securities litigation.

Holders of stock in companies that have a volatile stock price frequently bring securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. If any of our stockholders were to bring a lawsuit of this type against us, even if the lawsuit is without merit, we could incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. A stockholder lawsuit could also divert the time and attention of our management. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act and a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act and will be able to avail ourselves of reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies, which could make our common stock less attractive to investors and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Until December 31, 2021, when we will cease to be an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various requirements applicable to public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including:

●

the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting;

●

the “say on pay” provisions (requiring a non-binding shareholder vote to approve compensation of certain executive officers) and the “say on golden parachute” provisions (requiring a non-binding shareholder vote to approve golden parachute arrangements for certain executive officers in connection with mergers and certain other business combinations) of the Dodd-Frank Act and some of the disclosure requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act relating to compensation of our executive officers; and

●

the requirement to provide detailed compensation discussion and analysis in proxy statements and reports filed under the Exchange Act and instead provide a reduced level of disclosure concerning executive compensation.

We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

We are also a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures available to smaller reporting companies until the fiscal year following the determination that our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is more than $250.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenues are more than $100.0 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is more than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

Although we are still evaluating the JOBS Act, we currently intend to take advantage of some, but not all, of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements that will be available to us so long as we qualify as an “emerging growth company” and “smaller reporting company.” We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption and, therefore, we are not subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies. As a result, changes in rules of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or their interpretation, the adoption of new guidance or the application of existing guidance to changes in our business could significantly affect our financial position and results of operations. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting so long as we qualify as an “emerging growth company,” which may increase the risk that material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting go undetected. Likewise, so long as we qualify as a “smaller reporting company” or an “emerging growth company,” we may elect not to provide you with

~~Table of Contents~~

certain information, including certain financial information and certain information regarding compensation of our executive officers, that we would otherwise have been required to provide in filings we make with the SEC, which may make it more difficult for investors and securities analysts to evaluate our company. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock, and our stock price may be more volatile and may decline.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock so any returns will be limited to the value of our stock.

We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to the appreciation of their stock.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that

Table of Contents

any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, and may never, publish research on our company. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company or if they cease to cover our company, the trading price for our stock would likely be negatively impacted. In the event that securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. In addition, if our operating results fail to meet the forecast of analysts, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Risks Related to Our Charter and Bylaws

Anti-takeover provisions under our organizational documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change of control, which could limit the market price of our common stock and may prevent or frustrate attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our board of directors that our stockholders might consider favorable. Some of these provisions include:

●

•

a board of directors divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, such that not all members of the board will be elected at one time;

•

a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent, which requires that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

•

~~Table~~a requirement that special meetings of ~~Contents~~

the stockholders may be called only by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, and special meetings of stockholders may not be called by any other person or persons;

●

~~a prohibition on stockholder action through written consent, which requires that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;~~

●

a requirement that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, and special meetings of stockholders may not be called by any other person or persons;

●

~~advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to our board of directors;~~

●

a requirement that no member of our board of directors may be removed from office by our stockholders except for cause and, in addition to any other vote required by law, upon the approval of not less than two-thirds (2/3) of all outstanding shares of our voting stock then entitled to vote in the election of directors;

●

a requirement of approval of not less than a majority of all outstanding shares of our voting stock to amend any bylaws by stockholder action and not less than two-thirds (2/3) of all outstanding shares of our voting stock to amend specific provisions of our certificate of incorporation; and

●

the authority of the board of directors to issue preferred stock on terms determined by the board of directors without stockholder approval, which preferred stock may include rights superior to the rights of the holders of common stock.

•

advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to our board of directors;

•

In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporate Law, which may prohibit certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions in our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the

Table of Contents

then-current board of directors and could also delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing or cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our amended and restated bylaws designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.

Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for state law claims for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, and employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our second amended and restated bylaws (including the interpretation, validity or enforceability thereof), or (iv) any action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine(the “Delaware Forum Provision”). The Delaware Forum Provision will not apply to any causes of action arising under the Exchange Act. Our amended and restated bylaws further provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States shall be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act (the “Federal Forum Provision”). In addition, our amended and restated bylaws provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision; provided, however, that stockholders cannot and will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

The Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision in our bylaws may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims. Additionally, these forum selection clauses may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage the filing of lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees, even though an action, if successful, might benefit our stockholders. In addition, while the Delaware Supreme Court

~~Table of Contents~~

ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court are “facially valid” under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce our Federal Forum Provision. If the Federal Forum Provision is found to be unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters. The Federal Forum Provision may also impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert that the provision is not enforceable or invalid. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than our stockholders.

Risks Related to Income Taxes

Changes in tax laws could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect us or holders of our common stock. In recent years, many such changes have been made and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. For example, on March 27, 2020, the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act” or the CARES Act was enacted, which included certain changes in tax law intended to stimulate the U.S. economy in light of the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, including temporary beneficial changes to the treatment of net operating losses, interest deductibility limitations and payroll tax matters. Future changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

We might not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss carryforwards and research and development tax credit carryforwards.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards of ~~$127.4~~$222.4 million and ~~$47.2~~$137.0 million, respectively and federal and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of ~~$2.4~~$5.4 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million, respectively. If not utilized, such NOL carryforwards (other than ~~any~~ federal NOL carryforwards arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017) and research and development credits will expire at various dates beginning in 2037 and ~~2032,~~2033, respectively. Our ability to use our U.S. federal and state NOL and tax credit carryforwards to offset potential future taxable income and related income taxes that would otherwise be due is dependent upon our generation of future taxable income. We do not anticipate generating revenue from sales of products for the foreseeable future, if ever, and we may never achieve profitability. These NOL and tax credit carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. Under the current law, federal NOL carryforwards generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 are not subject to expiration. However, utilization of NOL carryforwards generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 are limited to a maximum of 80% of the taxable income for such year determined without regard to such NOL carryforwards. In addition, under ~~Section~~Sections 382 of the Code, the amount of benefits from our NOL carryforwards may be impaired or limited if we incur a cumulative ownership change of more than 50%, by certain stockholders, as interpreted by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, over a three-year period. We experienced ownership changes on March 24, 2017, June 7, 2018 and July 8, 2020. We may experience ownership changes again in the future, some of which may be outside our control. As a result, our use of federal NOL and tax credit carryforwards could be limited. State NOL carryforwards may be similarly limited. Any such disallowances may result in greater tax liabilities than we would incur in the absence of such a limitation and any increased liabilities could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

~~None.~~

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we did not issue or sell any unregistered securities not previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Form 10-K.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

~~None.~~

None.

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

~~None.~~

None.

8782

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

EXHIBIT INDEX

~~Exhibit~~


~~Number~~	~~Exhibit Description~~
~~3.1~~
Exhibit
Number	Exhibit Description
3.1	Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-38944) filed on June 24, ~~2019~~2019))

3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant and the amendments thereto, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~3.1~~3.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-38944) filed on March 12, 2021)

31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32.1+	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS*	Inline XBRL Instance Document –- the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL ~~document~~	document.

101.SCH*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema ~~Document.~~	Document

101.CAL*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase ~~Document.~~	Document

101.DEF*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase ~~Document.~~	Document

101.LAB*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase ~~Document.~~	Document

101.PRE* 104*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase ~~Document.~~Document

104*	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101*).

*	~~Filed herewith.~~

The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 hereto are deemed to be furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

* Filed herewith.

+ The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 hereto are deemed to be furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and will not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	AKERO THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Date: ~~November 12, 2021~~May 6, 2022	By:	/s/ ANDREW CHENG
		Andrew Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

		(Principal Executive Officer)
~~Date: November 12, 2021~~	~~By:~~		~~/s/ WILLIAM WHITE~~
			~~William White~~
Date: May 6, 2022	By:	/s/ WILLIAM WHITE
		William White
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Head of Corporate Development
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


	September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	164,935	$	187,242
Short-term marketable securities		50,146		81,145
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6,726		2,958
Total current assets		221,807		271,345
Property and equipment, net		101		131
Operating lease right-of-use asset		1,511		1,662
Other assets, noncurrent		114		201
Total assets	$	223,533	$	273,339
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	6,784	$	3,428
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		16,756		9,683
Total current liabilities		23,540		13,111
Operating lease liability, noncurrent		1,365		1,516
Total liabilities		24,905		14,627
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 34,875,302 and 34,741,649 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively		4		4
Additional paid-in capital		476,521		468,238
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(17)		(3)
Accumulated deficit		(277,880)		(209,527)
Total stockholders’ equity		198,628		258,712
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	223,533	$	273,339


	March 31, 2022			December 31, 2021
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	150,489		$	150,483
Short-term marketable securities		14,887			37,775
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,558			5,324
Total current assets		167,934			193,582
Property and equipment, net		79			90
Right of use asset		1,406			1,459
Other assets, noncurrent		468			417
Total assets	$	169,887		$	195,548
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,450		$	6,706
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		17,647			18,422
Total current liabilities		22,097			25,128
Operating lease liability, noncurrent		1,255			1,311
Total liabilities		23,352			26,439
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021; 35,022,935 and 34,900,727 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively		4			4
Additional paid-in capital		482,894			479,436
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(30	)		(27	)
Accumulated deficit		(336,333	)		(310,304	)
Total stockholders’ equity		146,535			169,109
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	169,887		$	195,548


				Additional		Accumulated Other				Total
	Common Stock			Paid-In-		Comprehensive		Accumulated		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Gain (Loss)		Deficit		Equity (Deficit)
Balances at December 31, 2020	34,741,649	$	4	$	468,238	$	(3)	$	(209,527)	$	258,712
Exercise of stock options	28,670		—		24		—		—		24
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—		9		—		—		9
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		2,364		—		—		2,364
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities	—		—		—		1		—		1
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(15,090)		(15,090)
Balances at March 31, 2021	34,770,319	$	4	$	470,635	$	(2)	$	(224,617)	$	246,020
Exercise of stock options	60,333		—		393		—		—		393
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—		9		—		—		9
Issuance of common stock pursuant to ESPP purchases	10,130		—		215		—		—		215
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		2,436		—		—		2,436
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities	—		—		—		(7)		—		(7)
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(28,933)		(28,933)
Balances at June 30, 2021	34,840,782	$	4	$	473,688	$	(9)	$	(253,550)	$	220,133
Exercise of stock options	34,520		—		219		—		—		219
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—		2		—		—		2
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		2,612		—		—		2,612
Net unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities	—		—		—		(8)		—		(8)
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(24,330)		(24,330)
Balances at September 30, 2021	34,875,302	$	4	$	476,521	$	(17)	$	(277,880)	$	198,628

Balances at December 31, 2019	28,567,837	$	3	$	259,049	$	(6)	$	(130,320)	$	128,726
Exercise of stock options	103,385		—		112		—		—		112
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—		30		—		—		30
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		1,238		—		—		1,238
Disgorgement of stockholders' short-swing profits, net	—		—		52		—		—		52
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities	—		—		—		51		—		51
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(11,886)		(11,886)
Balances at March 31, 2020	28,671,222	$	3	$	260,481	$	45	$	(142,206)	$	118,323
Exercise of stock options	3,202		—		9		—		—		9
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—		13		—		—		13
Issuance of common stock pursuant to ESPP purchases	9,255		—		158		—		—		158
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		1,322		—		—		1,322
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities	—		—		—		45		—		45
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(16,207)		(16,207)
Balances at June 30, 2020	28,683,679	$	3	$	261,983	$	90	$	(158,413)	$	103,663
Issuance of common stock upon closing of secondary public offering, net of issuance costs and underwriting fees of $906	6,012,390		1		202,553		—		—		202,554
Exercise of stock options	24,606		—		163		—		—		163
Vesting of restricted stock	—		—		9		—		—		9
Stock-based compensation expense	—		—		1,546		—		—		1,546
Net unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities	—		—		—		(74)		—		(74)
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(21,403)		(21,403)
Balances at September 30, 2020	34,720,675	$	4	$	466,254	$	16	$	(179,816)	$	286,458


							Accumulated
					Additional		Other						Total
	Common Stock				Paid-In-		Comprehensive			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Gain (Loss)			Deficit			Equity (Deficit)
Balances at December 31, 2021		34,900,727	$	4	$	479,436	$	(27	)	$	(310,304	)	$	169,109
Exercise of stock options		122,208		—		147		—			—			147
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		3,311		—			—			3,311
Net unrealized loss on short-term marketable securities		—		—		—		(3	)		—			(3	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(26,029	)		(26,029	)
Balances at March 31, 2022		35,022,935	$	4	$	482,894	$	(30	)	$	(336,333	)	$	146,535

Balances at December 31, 2020		34,741,649	$	4	$	468,238	$	(3	)	$	(209,527	)	$	258,712
Exercise of stock options		28,670		—		24		—			—			24
Vesting of restricted stock		—		—		9		—			—			9
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		2,364		—			—			2,364
Net unrealized gain on short-term marketable securities		—		—		—		1			—			1
Net loss		—		—		—		—			(15,090	)		(15,090	)
Balances at March 31, 2021		34,770,319	$	4	$	470,635	$	(2	)	$	(224,617	)	$	246,020


	September 30, 2021
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	139,039	$	139,039	$	—	$	—
Commercial paper		7,000		—		7,000		—
Corporate debt securities		43,146		—		43,146		—
	$	189,185	$	139,039	$	50,146	$	—

	December 31, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	158,023	$	158,023	$	—	$	—
Commercial paper		47,955		—		47,955		—
Corporate debt securities		33,190		—		33,190		—
	$	239,168	$	158,023	$	81,145	$	—


	September 30, 2021
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
Money market funds	$	139,039	$	—	$	—	$	139,039
Commercial paper		7,000		—		—		7,000
Corporate debt securities		43,163		—		(17)		43,146
	$	189,202	$	—	$	(17)	$	189,185

Cash equivalents							$	139,039
Short-term marketable securities								50,146
							$	189,185

	December 31, 2020
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
Money market funds	$	158,023	$	—	$	—	$	158,023
Commercial paper		47,955		—		—		47,955
Corporate debt securities		33,193		—		(3)		33,190
	$	239,171	$	—	$	(3)	$	239,168

Cash equivalents							$	158,023
Short-term marketable securities								81,145
							$	239,168


		Grant-Date Fair
	Number of Shares	Value
Unvested restricted common stock as of December 31, 2020	33,614	$	0.62
Shares vesting	(33,614)		0.62
Unvested restricted common stock as of September 30, 2021	—		-


		Weighted-		Weighted-
		Average		Average	Aggregate
		Exercise		remaining	Intrinsic
	Number	Price per		contractual	Value
	of Options	Share		term (years)	(000's)
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2020	3,733,312	$	12.15	8.53	$	52,498
Options granted	422,263	$	25.71
Options exercised	(123,523)	$	5.15
Balance outstanding, September 30, 2021	4,032,052	$	13.79	7.98	$	39,854
Exercisable, September 30, 2021	1,843,127	$	10.20	7.63	$	23,444
Vested and expected to vest, September 30, 2021	4,032,052	$	13.79	7.98	$	39,854


2021 (remaining)	$	77
2022		312
2023		321
2024		331
2025		341
2026 and thereafter		559
Total future minimum lease payments		1,941
Less imputed interest		(377)
Present value of operating lease liabilities	$	1,564


		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
		2021		2020		2021		2020
Lease cost:	Statement of Operations Classification:
Operating lease cost	General and administrative expense	$	81	$	73	$	243	$	186
Variable operating lease cost	General and administrative expense		—		—		—		43
Short-term lease cost	Research and development expense		—		8		—		32
Total operating lease cost		$	81	$	81	$	243	$	261

Other information:
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liability		$	76	$	18	$	226	$	135
Weighted average remaining lease term, in years			5.8		6.8		5.8		6.8
Weighted average discount rate			7.6%		7.6%		7.6%		7.6%


	Payments due by period as of
			Less than 1		1 to 3		3 to 5		More than 5
	Total		year		years		years		years

	(in thousands)
Operating lease obligations¹	$	1,941	$	309	$	647	$	687	$	298
Purchase obligations²		11,123		11,123		—		—		—
Total non-cancelable contractual obligations	$	13,064	$	11,432	$	647	$	687	$	298