x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	Third Quarter					First Nine Months					Second Quarter					First Half
	2015			2014		2015			2014
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)											2016			2015		2016			2015
Net sales	$	618,806		$	457,676	$	1,686,742		$	1,305,731	$	840,384		$	614,683	$	1,465,840		$	1,067,936
Cost of sales		380,270			272,734		1,026,516			778,936		520,677			377,366		902,235			646,246
Gross margin		238,536			184,942		660,226			526,795		319,707			237,317		563,605			421,690
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses		210,851			156,496		577,323			454,969		264,971			199,001		496,468			366,472
Income from operations		27,685			28,446		82,903			71,826		54,736			38,316		67,137			55,218
Interest expense, net		6,686			7,333		20,751			21,899		9,808			6,718		19,169			14,065
Other income (expense)		(3,992	)		0		(3,003	)		0
Gain on exchange of franchise territory		0			0		8,807			0
Gain on sale of business		22,651			0		22,651			0
Other income (expense), net												(16,274	)		6,078		(33,425	)		989
Gain (loss) on exchange of franchise territory												(692	)		8,807		(692	)		8,807
Income before income taxes		39,658			21,113		90,607			49,927		27,962			46,483		13,851			50,949
Income tax expense		12,099			7,408		31,174			17,789		10,638			17,562		5,560			19,075
Net income		27,559			13,705		59,433			32,138		17,324			28,921		8,291			31,874
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		2,006			1,573		4,722			3,774		1,672			1,987		2,680			2,716
Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated	$	25,553		$	12,132	$	54,711		$	28,364	$	15,652		$	26,934	$	5,611		$	29,158

Basic net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated:
Common Stock	$	2.75		$	1.31	$	5.89		$	3.06	$	1.68		$	2.90	$	0.60		$	3.14
Weighted average number of Common Stock shares outstanding		7,141			7,141		7,141			7,141		7,141			7,141		7,141			7,141

Class B Common Stock	$	2.75		$	1.31	$	5.89		$	3.06	$	1.68		$	2.90	$	0.60		$	3.14
Weighted average number of Class B Common Stock shares outstanding		2,151			2,130		2,146			2,125		2,172			2,151		2,164			2,143

Diluted net income per share based on net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated:
Common Stock	$	2.74		$	1.30	$	5.87		$	3.05	$	1.67		$	2.89	$	0.60		$	3.13
Weighted average number of Common Stock shares outstanding – assuming dilution		9,332			9,311		9,327			9,306		9,353			9,332		9,345			9,324

Class B Common Stock	$	2.73		$	1.30	$	5.85		$	3.04	$	1.67		$	2.88	$	0.59		$	3.12
Weighted average number of Class B Common Stock shares outstanding – assuming dilution		2,191			2,170		2,186			2,165		2,212			2,191		2,204			2,183

Cash dividends per share:
Common Stock	$	.25		$	.25	$	.75		$	.75	$	0.25		$	0.25	$	0.50		$	0.50
Class B Common Stock	$	.25		$	.25	$	.75		$	.75	$	0.25		$	0.25	$	0.50		$	0.50

	Third Quarter						First Nine Months						Second Quarter						First Half
	2015			2014			2015			2014
In Thousands													2016			2015			2016			2015
Net income	$	27,559		$	13,705		$	59,433		$	32,138		$	17,324		$	28,921			8,291		$	31,874

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		1			(4	)		(3	)		(4	)		(6	)		-			4			(4	)
Defined benefit plans reclassification included in pension costs:
Actuarial loss		490			277			1,467			795
Prior service costs		7			5			18			16
Actuarial gains														455			488			910			977
Prior service benefits														5			6			9			11
Postretirement benefits reclassification included in benefits costs:
Actuarial loss		442			344			1,323			1,035
Actuarial gains														361			441			721			881
Prior service costs		(518	)		(231	)		(1,550	)		(696	)		(516	)		(516	)		(1,032	)		(1,032	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		422			391			1,255			1,146			299			419			612			833

Comprehensive income		27,981			14,096			60,688			33,284			17,623			29,340			8,903			32,707
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		2,006			1,573			4,722			3,774			1,672			1,987			2,680			2,716
Comprehensive income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated	$	25,975		$	12,523		$	55,966		$	29,510		$	15,951		$	27,353		$	6,223		$	29,991

	Sept. 27,			Dec. 28,			Sept. 28,
	2015			2014			2014
In Thousands (Except Share Data)										July 3, 2016			January 3, 2016			June 28, 2015
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents										$	49,323		$	55,498		$	43,801
Accounts receivable, trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,678, $2,117 and $1,517 respectively											285,442			184,009			192,600
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company											51,620			28,564			41,324
Accounts receivable, other											24,173			24,047			19,467
Inventories (Note 3)											126,731			89,464			99,641
Prepaid expenses and other current assets											53,175			53,337			39,722
Total current assets											590,464			434,919			436,555
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 4)											706,471			525,820			419,263
Leased property under capital leases, net											36,490			40,145			43,257
Other assets											79,062			63,739			64,218
Franchise rights (Note 5)											533,040			527,540			527,540
Goodwill (Note 5)											139,756			117,954			111,591
Other identifiable intangible assets, net (Note 6)											160,467			136,448			105,818
Total assets										$	2,245,750		$	1,846,565		$	1,708,242
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current Liabilities:
Current portion of debt	$	164,757		$	0		$	0
Current portion of obligations under capital leases		6,945			6,446			6,325		$	7,270		$	7,063		$	6,859
Accounts payable, trade		78,872			58,640			49,477			125,261			82,937			79,327
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company		85,890			51,227			47,093			130,452			79,065			92,004
Other accrued liabilities		93,098			68,775			73,856
Other accrued liabilities (Note 7)											129,652			104,168			97,268
Accrued compensation		40,562			38,677			31,953			36,622			49,839			32,724
Accrued interest payable		6,177			3,655			9,107			3,523			3,481			2,269
Total current liabilities		476,301			227,420			217,811			432,780			326,553			310,451

Deferred income taxes		138,288			140,000			150,543			136,841			146,944			137,402
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations		122,778			134,100			80,993			117,919			115,197			133,548
Other liabilities		225,928			177,250			141,625
Other liabilities (Note 11)											352,957			267,090			225,202
Obligations under capital leases		50,505			52,604			54,243			45,026			48,721			52,294
Long-term debt		384,155			444,759			443,709
Long-term debt (Note 8)											829,818			619,628			562,111
Total liabilities		1,397,955			1,176,133			1,088,924			1,915,341			1,524,133			1,421,008

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 12)

Equity:
Common Stock, $1.00 par value:
Authorized – 30,000,000 shares;
Issued – 10,203,821 shares		10,204			10,204			10,204
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value:
Authorized – 10,000,000 shares;
Issued – 2,778,896, 2,757,976 and 2,757,976 shares, respectively		2,777			2,756			2,756
Common Stock, $1.00 par value: authorized – 30,000,000 shares; issued – 10,203,821 shares											10,204			10,204			10,204
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 par value: authorized – 10,000,000 shares; issued – 2,799,816, 2,778,896 and 2,778,896 shares, respectively											2,798			2,777			2,777
Capital in excess of par value		113,064			110,860			110,860			116,769			113,064			113,064
Retained earnings		258,704			210,957			210,285			261,631			260,672			235,474
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(88,659	)		(89,914	)		(57,030	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 14)											(81,795	)		(82,407	)		(89,081	)
		296,090			244,863			277,075			309,607			304,310			272,438
Less-Treasury stock, at cost:
Common – 3,062,374 shares		60,845			60,845			60,845
Class B Common – 628,114 shares		409			409			409
Less-Treasury stock, at cost: Common Stock – 3,062,374 shares											60,845			60,845			60,845
Less-Treasury stock, at cost: Class B Common Stock – 628,114 shares											409			409			409
Total equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated		234,836			183,609			215,821			248,353			243,056			211,184
Noncontrolling interest		78,056			73,334			72,380			82,056			79,376			76,050
Total equity		312,892			256,943			288,201			330,409			322,432			287,234

Total liabilities and equity	$	1,710,847		$	1,433,076		$	1,377,125		$	2,245,750		$	1,846,565		$	1,708,242

Common
Stock

Class B
Common
Stock

Capital
in
Excess of
Par Value

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

Treasury
Stock

Total
Equity
of CCBCC

Noncontrolling
Interest

Total
Equity

Balance on Dec. 29, 2013

$
10,204

$
2,735

$
108,942

$
188,869

$
(58,176
)

$
(61,254
)

$
191,320

$
68,606

$
259,926

Net income

28,364

28,364

3,774

32,138

Other comprehensive income,
   net of tax

1,146

1,146

1,146

Cash dividends paid
    Common ($.75 per share)

(5,356
)

(5,356
)

(5,356
)
    Class B Common
    ($.75 per share)

(1,592
)

(1,592
)

(1,592
)
Stock compensation
   adjustments

176

176

176

Issuance of 20,900 shares of
   Class B Common Stock

21

1,742

1,763

1,763

Balance on Sept. 28, 2014

$
10,204

$
2,756

$
110,860

$
210,285

$
(57,030
)

$
(61,254
)

$
215,821

$
72,380

$
288,201

Balance on Dec. 28, 2014

$
10,204

$
2,756

$
110,860

$
210,957

$
(89,914
)

$
(61,254
)

$
183,609

$
73,334

$
256,943

Net income

54,711

54,711

4,722

59,433

Other comprehensive income,
   net of tax

1,255

1,255

1,255

Cash dividends paid
   Common ($.75 per share)

(5,356
)

(5,356
)

(5,356
)
   Class B Common
   ($.75 per share)

(1,608
)

(1,608
)

(1,608
)
Issuance of 20,920 shares of
   Class B Common Stock

21

2,204

2,225

2,225

Balance on Sept. 27, 2015

$
10,204

$
2,777

$
113,064

$
258,704

$
(88,659
)

$
(61,254
)

$
234,836

$
78,056

$
312,892

In Thousands (Except Share Data)	Common Stock		Class B Common Stock		Capital in Excess of Par Value		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock - Common Stock			Treasury Stock - Class B Common Stock			Total Equity of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated			Non- controlling Interest		Total Equity
Balance on December 28, 2014	$	10,204	$	2,756	$	110,860	$	210,957		$	(89,914	)	$	(60,845	)	$	(409	)	$	183,609		$	73,334	$	256,943
Net income		-		-		-		29,158			-			-			-			29,158			2,716		31,874
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		-		-		-		-			833			-			-			833			-		833
Cash dividends paid:
Common ($0.50 per share)		-		-		-		(3,571	)		-			-			-			(3,571	)		-		(3,571	)
Class B Common ($0.50 per share)		-		-		-		(1,070	)		-			-			-			(1,070	)		-		(1,070	)
Issuance of 20,920 shares of Class B Common Stock		-		21		2,204		-			-			-			-			2,225			-		2,225
Balance on June 28, 2015	$	10,204	$	2,777	$	113,064	$	235,474		$	(89,081	)	$	(60,845	)	$	(409	)	$	211,184		$	76,050	$	287,234

Balance on January 3, 2016	$	10,204	$	2,777	$	113,064	$	260,672		$	(82,407	)	$	(60,845	)	$	(409	)	$	243,056		$	79,376	$	322,432
Net income		-		-		-		5,611			-			-			-			5,611			2,680		8,291
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		-		-		-		-			612			-			-			612			-		612
Cash dividends paid:
Common ($0.50 per share)		-		-		-		(3,571	)		-			-			-			(3,571	)		-		(3,571	)
Class B Common ($0.50 per share)		-		-		-		(1,081	)		-			-			-			(1,081	)		-		(1,081	)
Issuance of 20,920 shares of Class B Common Stock		-		21		3,705		-			-			-			-			3,726			-		3,726
Balance on July 3, 2016	$	10,204	$	2,798	$	116,769	$	261,631		$	(81,795	)	$	(60,845	)	$	(409	)	$	248,353		$	82,056	$	330,409

	First Nine Months						First Half
	2015			2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
In Thousands							2016			2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	59,433		$	32,138		$	8,291		$	31,874
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation expense		56,299			44,358			49,902			35,994
Amortization of intangibles		2,110			377			2,427			1,380
Deferred income taxes		(3,489	)		655			(1,476	)		(1,454	)
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment		679			231			1,356			449
Impairment of property, plant and equipment		148			0			382			148
Gain on exchange of franchise territory		(8,807	)		0
Gain on sale of business		(22,651	)		0
Gain (loss) on exchange of franchise territory								692			(8,807	)
Amortization of debt costs		1,491			1,438			1,166			996
Amortization of deferred gain related to terminated interest rate agreements		(125	)		(420	)
Stock compensation expense		5,674			2,272			2,896			2,980
Fair value adjustment of acquisition-related contingent consideration		3,003			0
Increase in current assets less current liabilities (exclusive of acquisition)		(16,381	)		(20,370	)
Increase in other noncurrent assets (exclusive of acquisition)		(3,447	)		(3,362	)
Decrease in other noncurrent liabilities (exclusive of acquisition)		(1,444	)		(7,343	)
Fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration								33,425			(989	)
Change in current assets less current liabilities (exclusive of acquisition)								(27,088	)		(29,538	)
Change in other noncurrent assets (exclusive of acquisition)								(9,014	)		(4,106	)
Change in other noncurrent liabilities (exclusive of acquisition)								(1,788	)		4,183
Other		(10	)		(6	)		26			(142	)
Total adjustments		13,050			17,830			52,906			1,094
Net cash provided by operating activities		72,483			49,968			61,197			32,968

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment (exclusive of acquisition)		(104,422	)		(61,357	)		(79,625	)		(57,140	)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment		274			1,212			282			144
Proceeds from the sale of BYB Brands, Inc.		26,360			0
Acquisition of new territories, net of cash acquired		(52,739	)		(12,163	)
Investment in CONA Services LLC								(6,634	)		-
Acquisition of Expansion Territories, net of cash acquired								(174,695	)		(51,276	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(130,527	)		(72,308	)		(260,672	)		(108,272	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Borrowings under revolving credit facilities		269,000			85,000
Payment on revolving credit facilities		(65,000	)		(40,000	)
Payment of debt		(100,000	)		0
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings under Term Loan Facility								300,000			-
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility								310,000			239,000
Payment of Revolving Credit Facility								(235,000	)		(20,000	)
Payment of Senior Notes								(164,757	)		(100,000	)
Cash dividends paid		(6,964	)		(6,948	)		(4,652	)		(4,641	)
Excess tax expense from stock-based compensation		0			176
Payment on acquisition related contingent consideration		(2,405	)		0
Payment of acquisition related contingent consideration								(7,926	)		(789	)
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(4,889	)		(4,420	)		(3,488	)		(3,258	)
Debt issuance costs (revolving credit facility)		(214	)		0
Other		(88	)		(162	)		(877	)		(302	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		89,440			33,646			193,300			110,010

Net increase in cash		31,396			11,306
Net increase (decrease) in cash								(6,175	)		34,706
Cash at beginning of period		9,095			11,761			55,498			9,095
Cash at end of period	$	40,491		$	23,067		$	49,323		$	43,801

Significant noncash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of Class B Common Stock in connection with stock award	$	2,225		$	1,763		$	3,726		$	2,225
Capital lease obligations incurred		3,361			0			-			3,361
Additions to property, plant and equipment accrued and recorded in accounts payable, trade		6,430			2,854			9,086			6,997

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated and its majority-owned subsidiaries (the “Company” and “we”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal, recurring accruals, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. ~~All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.~~

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with ~~United States~~U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ~~(GAAP)~~(“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are consistent with those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10‑K for the fiscal year ended ~~December 28, 2014~~January 3, 2016 filed with the ~~United States~~U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended January 3, 2016 under the caption “Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” set forth in Part II, Item 7, a discussion of the Company’s most significant accounting policies, which are those most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

The Company did not make changes in any significant accounting policies during the first half of 2016. Any changes in significant accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for debt issuance costs. The new guidance requires that all cost incurred to issue debt be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying value of the debt. In August 2015, the FASB issued additional guidance which clarified that an entity can present debt issuance costs of a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The standard was retrospectively adopted by the Company on January 4, 2016. As a result, $3.1 million and $1.1 million of debt issuance costs at January 3, 2016 were reclassified to long-term debt from other assets and prepaid expenses and other current assets, respectively. At June 28, 2015, $0.4 million and $1.3 million of debt issuance costs were reclassified to long-term debt from other assets and prepaid expenses and other current assets, respectively.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. The new guidance was to be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date to annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In March 2016, April 2016 and May 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that amends certain aspects of the May 2014 new guidance. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued new guidance that specifies the responsibility that an entity’s management has to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for inventory. The new guidance requires entities to measure most inventory “at lower of cost and net realizable value” thereby simplifying the current guidance under which an entity must measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which amends the guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The new guidance revises the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes in financial liabilities measured at fair value. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for leases. The new guidance requires lessees to recognize a right-to-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods beginning the following year. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee-share based transactions including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Since April 2013, as a part of The Coca‑Cola Company’s plans to refranchise its North American bottling territories, the Company has engaged in a series of transactions with The Coca‑Cola Company and Coca‑Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca‑Cola Company, to expand the Company’s distribution operations significantly through the acquisition of rights to serve additional distribution territories previously served by CCR (the “Expansion Territories”) and of related distribution assets (the “Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions”). During 2015, the Company completed ~~its acquisitions of distribution territories~~Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions announced as part of the April 2013 letter of intent signed with The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company. ~~The~~These completed ~~expansion of the Company’s distribution territory includes distribution rights~~acquisitions include Expansion Territories in parts of Tennessee, Kentucky and ~~Indiana~~Indiana.

On May 12, 2015, the Company and The Coca‑Cola Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent (the “May 2015 LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would (i) grant the Company in two phases certain exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and -licensed products in additional territories served by ~~Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”), a wholly owned subsidiary~~CCR and (ii) sell the Company certain assets that included rights to distribute those cross‑licensed brands distributed in the territories by CCR as well as the assets used by CCR in the distribution of the cross‑licensed brands and The ~~Coca-Cola Company.~~Coca‑Cola Company brands. The major markets that would be served by the Company as part of the expansion contemplated by the May 2015 LOI include: Baltimore, Maryland; Alexandria, Norfolk and Richmond, Virginia; the District of Columbia; Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton, Ohio; and Indianapolis, Indiana.

On September 23, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement for the first phase of the additional distribution territory contemplated by the May 2015 LOI including: (i) eastern and northern Virginia, (ii) the entire state of Maryland, (iii) the District of Columbia, and (iv) parts of Delaware, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and West Virginia (the “Next Phase Territories”). The first closing for the series of Next Phase Territories transactions (the “Next Phase Territories Transactions”) occurred on October 30, 2015, for territories served by distribution facilities in Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton, Virginia and Elizabeth City, North Carolina. The second closing for the series of Next Phase Territories Transactions occurred on January 29, 2016, for territories served by distribution facilities in Easton and Salisbury, Maryland and Richmond and Yorktown, Virginia. The third closing for the series of Next Phase Territories Transactions occurred on April 1, 2016, for territories served by distribution facilities in Alexandria, Virginia and Capitol Heights and La Plata, Maryland. The final closing for the series of Next Phase Territories Transactions occurred on April 29, 2016, for territories served by distribution facilities in Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland, Maryland.

At the closings of each of the ~~expansion territories~~Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions (excluding the ~~Lexington-for-Jackson~~ exchange for the Lexington Expansion Territory, as described below), the Company signed a Comprehensive Beverage Agreement (“CBA”) with The Coca‑Cola Company and CCR for each of the territories which has a term of ten years and is ~~renewable by the Company indefinitely~~automatically renewed for successive additional terms of ten years ~~each~~unless the Company gives notice to terminate at least one year prior to the expiration of a ten-year term or unless earlier terminated as provided therein. Under the CBAs, the Company ~~will make~~makes a quarterly sub-bottling payment to CCR on a continuing basis for the grant of exclusive rights to distribute, promote, market and sell specified covered beverages and related products, as defined in the agreements. The quarterly sub-bottling payment, which is accounted for as contingent consideration, is based on sales of certain beverages and beverage products that are sold under the same trademarks that identify a covered beverage, related product ~~(each as~~or certain cross-licensed brands (as defined in the ~~CBA) or certain cross-licensed brands.~~CBAs). The ~~CBA imposes~~CBAs impose certain obligations on the Company with respect to serving the ~~expansion territories that~~Expansion Territories and failure to meet these obligations could result in termination of a CBA if the Company fails to take corrective measures within a specified time frame.

The May 2015 LOI contemplated that The Coca‑Cola Company would work collaboratively with the Company and certain other expanding participating bottlers in the U.S. (“EPBs”) to implement a national product supply system. As a result of subsequent discussions among the EPBs and The Coca‑Cola Company, on September 23, 2015, the Company and The Coca‑Cola Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent (the “Manufacturing LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would sell six manufacturing facilities (“Regional Manufacturing Facilities”) and related manufacturing assets (collectively, “Manufacturing Assets”) to the Company as the Company becomes a regional producing bottler (“Regional Producing Bottler”) in the national product supply system (the “Manufacturing Facility Expansion Transactions” and, together with the Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions, the “Expansion Transactions”). Similar to, and as an integral part of, the Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions described in the May 2015 LOI, the sale of the Manufacturing Assets by CCR to the Company would be accomplished in two phases. The first phase includes three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Sandston, Virginia; Silver Spring, Maryland; and Baltimore, Maryland that serve the Next Phase Territories. The second phase includes three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Indianapolis, Indiana; Portland, Indiana; and Cincinnati, Ohio that serve the distribution territories in central and southern Ohio, northern Kentucky and parts of Indiana and Illinois. On October 30, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement (the “October 2015 APA”) for the Manufacturing Assets that comprise the three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Sandston, Virginia; Silver Spring, Maryland; and Baltimore, Maryland (the “Next Phase Manufacturing Transactions”). The first closing for the series of Next Phase Manufacturing Transactions occurred on January 29, 2016, for the Sandston, Virginia facility. The interim and final closings for the series of Next Phase Manufacturing Transactions occurred on April 29, 2016, for the Silver Spring, Maryland facility and the Baltimore, Maryland facility.

On February 8, 2016, the Company and The Coca‑Cola Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent (the “February 2016 LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would (i) grant the Company exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and -licensed products in additional territories served by CCR in northern Ohio and northern West Virginia, (ii) sell the Company certain assets that included rights to distribute those cross-licensed brands distributed in the territories by CCR as well as the assets used by CCR in the distribution of the cross-licensed brands and The Coca‑Cola Company brands, and (iii) sell to the Company an additional Regional Manufacturing Facility currently owned by CCR located in Twinsburg, Ohio and related Manufacturing Assets. The transactions proposed in the February 2016 LOI would provide exclusive distribution rights for the Company in the following major markets: Akron, Elyria, Toledo, Willoughby, and Youngstown County in Ohio.

On June 14, 2016, the Company and The Coca‑Cola Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent (the “CCR June 2016 LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would (i) grant the Company exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products in additional territories in northeastern Kentucky and southwestern West Virginia served by CCR’s distribution center in Louisa, Kentucky, (ii) sell the Company certain assets that included rights to distribute those cross-licensed brands distributed in the territories by CCR as well as the assets used by CCR in the distribution of the cross-licensed brands and The Coca‑Cola Company brands and (iii) exchange exclusive rights and associated distribution assets and working capital of CCR relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products and certain cross-licensed brands in territory in parts of Arkansas, southwestern Tennessee and northwestern Mississippi served by CCR and two additional Regional Manufacturing Facilities currently owned by CCR located in Memphis, Tennessee and West Memphis, Arkansas and related Manufacturing Assets for exclusive rights and associated distribution assets and working capital of the Company relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products and certain cross-licensed brands in territory in southern Alabama, southern Mississippi and southern Georgia currently served by the Company and a Regional Manufacturing Facility currently owned by the Company in Mobile, Alabama and related Manufacturing Assets. The transactions proposed by the CCR June 2016 LOI would provide exclusive distribution rights for the Company in the following major markets: Little Rock, West Memphis and southern Arkansas; Memphis, Tennessee; and Louisa, Kentucky.

On June 14, 2016, the Company and Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc. (“United”), which is an independent bottler and unrelated to the Company, entered into a non-binding letter of intent pursuant to which the Company would exchange exclusive rights and associated distribution assets and working capital relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of

The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products and certain cross-licensed brands in certain territory in south-central Tennessee, northwest Alabama and northwest Florida currently served by the Company’s distribution centers located in Florence, Alabama and Panama City, Florida, for certain of United’s exclusive rights and associated distribution assets and working capital relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products and certain cross-licensed brands in certain territory in and around Spartanburg and Bluffton, South Carolina currently served by United’s distribution centers located in Spartanburg, South Carolina and Savannah, Georgia.

On May 23, 2014, the Company acquired distribution rights and related assets for the Johnson City and Morristown, Tennessee territory, and on October 24, 2014, the Company acquired distribution rights and related assets for the Knoxville, Tennessee territory ~~(“2014~~(collectively the “2014 Expansion Territories”) from CCR.

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~2015 Expansion Territories

~~The fair values of~~During 2015, the Company acquired ~~assets~~distribution rights and ~~assumed liabilities as of the acquisition dates are summarized as follows:~~

~~The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible~~related assets ~~is as follows:~~

~~The goodwill of $0.6 million and $4.7 million~~ for the ~~Johnson City/Morristown~~following territories: Cleveland and ~~Knoxville, Territories, respectively, is primarily attributed to~~Cookeville, Tennessee; Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana; Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky; Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton, Virginia; and Elizabeth City, North Carolina (the “2015 Expansion Territories”). The Company also acquired a make-ready center in Annapolis, Maryland in 2015. During the ~~workforce. Goodwill~~fourth quarter of ~~$0.1 million and $4.5 million for the Johnson City/Morristown and Knoxville Territories, respectively, is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. During Q3~~ 2015, the Company made certain measurement period adjustments as a result of purchase price changes to reflect the revised opening balance sheets for the ~~Johnson City/Morristown~~Cleveland and ~~Knoxville,~~Cookeville, Tennessee and Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana territories.

On December 5, 2014, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee (the “January 2015 Expansion Territory”). The ~~effect~~closing of this transaction occurred on January 30, 2015, for a cash purchase price after final adjustments of $13.2 million.

On December 17, 2014, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana (the “February 2015 Expansion Territory”). The closing of this transaction occurred on February 27, 2015, for a cash purchase price after final adjustments of $18.0 million.

On February 13, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “February 2015 APA”) related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky (the “May 2015 Expansion Territory”). The closing of this transaction occurred on May 1, 2015, for a cash purchase price of $7.5 million, which will remain subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the February 2015 APA.

Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton, Virginia; and Elizabeth City, North Carolina Territory Acquisitions

On September 23, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “September 2015 APA”) related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton, Virginia, and Elizabeth City, North Carolina (the “October 2015 Expansion Territory”). The closing of this transaction occurred on October 30, 2015, for a cash purchase price of $26.1 million, which will remain subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the September 2015 APA.

As a part of the Expansion Transactions, on October 30, 2015, the Company acquired from CCR a “make-ready center” in Annapolis, Maryland (the “Annapolis MRC”) for approximately $5.3 million, subject to a final post-closing adjustment. The Company recorded a bargain purchase gain of approximately $2.0 million on this transaction after applying a deferred tax liability of approximately $1.3 million. The Company uses the make-ready center to deploy and refurbish vending and other sales equipment for use in the marketplace.

The fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, which for the May 2015 Expansion Territory, the October 2015 Expansion Territory and the Annapolis MRC transaction remain subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms and conditions of each respective transaction’s asset purchase agreement, of the 2015 Expansion Territories and the Annapolis MRC as of the acquisition dates is summarized as follows:

In Thousands	January 2015 Expansion Territory		February 2015 Expansion Territory		May 2015 Expansion Territory		October 2015 Expansion Territory		Annapolis MRC
Cash	$	59	$	105	$	45	$	160	$	-
Inventories		1,238		1,268		1,045		2,564		109
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		714		1,108		224		1,305		-
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company		322		740		294		-		-
Property, plant and equipment		6,291		15,656		6,210		24,832		8,492
Other assets (including deferred taxes)		336		1,354		510		4,272		-
Goodwill		1,388		1,517		1,010		7,657		-
Other identifiable intangible assets		12,950		20,350		1,700		49,100		-
Total acquired assets	$	23,298	$	42,098	$	11,038	$	89,890	$	8,601

Current liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)	$	843	$	1,659	$	281	$	547	$	-
Other current liabilities		125		974		494		4,222		-
Other liabilities		-		823		10		-		1,265
Other liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)		9,131		20,625		2,748		58,925		-
Total assumed liabilities	$	10,099	$	24,081	$	3,533	$	63,694	$	1,265

The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets of the 2015 Expansion Territories as of the acquisition dates is as follows:

The goodwill of $1.4 million, $1.5 million, $1.0 million and $7.7 million for the January 2015 Expansion Territory, February 2015 Expansion Territory, May 2015 Expansion Territory and October 2015 Expansion Territory, respectively, is primarily attributed to the workforce acquired. Goodwill of $1.1 million, $0.2 million and $1.1 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes for the January 2015 Expansion Territory, May 2015 Expansion Territory and October 2015 Expansion Territory, respectively. No goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes for the February 2015 Expansion Territory.

During the quarter ended April 3, 2016 (“Q1 2016”), the Company acquired distribution rights and related assets in Easton and Salisbury, Maryland and Richmond and Yorktown, Virginia on January 29, 2016, and Alexandria, Virginia and Capitol Heights and La Plata, Maryland on April 1, 2016, and acquired the Sandston, Virginia Regional Manufacturing Facility and related Manufacturing Assets on January 29, 2016 (the “Q1 2016 Expansion Transactions”).

During the quarter ended July 3, 2016 (“Q2 2016”), the Company acquired distribution rights and related assets in Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland, Maryland on April 29, 2016, and also acquired the Silver Spring, Maryland and Baltimore, Maryland Regional Manufacturing Facilities and related Manufacturing Assets on April 29, 2016 (the “Q2 2016 Expansion Transactions” and, together with the Q1 2016 Expansion Transactions, the “YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions”).

Easton and Salisbury, Maryland and Richmond and Yorktown, Virginia Territory Acquisitions and Sandston, Virginia Regional Manufacturing Facility Acquisition

The September 2015 APA contemplated the Company’s acquisition of distribution rights and related assets in the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Easton and Salisbury, Maryland and Richmond and Yorktown, Virginia and the October 2015 APA contemplated the Company’s acquisition of the Regional Manufacturing Facility and related Manufacturing Assets in Sandston, Virginia (the “January 2016 Expansion Transactions”). The closing of the January 2016 Expansion Transactions occurred on January 29, 2016, for a cash purchase price of $65.7 million, which will remain subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the September 2015 APA and October 2015 APA.

Alexandria, Virginia and Capitol Heights and La Plata, Maryland Territory Acquisitions

The September 2015 APA also contemplated the Company’s acquisition of distribution rights and related assets in the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Alexandria, Virginia and Capitol Heights and La Plata, Maryland (the “April 1, 2016 Expansion Transaction”). The closing of the April 1, 2016 Expansion Transaction occurred on April 1, 2016, for a cash purchase price of $35.6 million, which will remain subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the September 2015 APA.

Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland, Maryland Territory Acquisitions and Silver Spring and Baltimore, Maryland Regional Manufacturing Facilities Acquisitions

On April 29, 2016, the Company completed the remaining transactions contemplated by (i) the September 2015 APA by acquiring distribution rights and related assets in Expansion Territories served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland, Maryland and (ii) the October 2015 APA by acquiring the Regional Manufacturing Facilities and related Manufacturing Assets in Silver Spring and Baltimore, Maryland (the “April 29, 2016 Expansion Transactions”). The closing of the April 29, 2016 Expansion Transactions occurred for a cash purchase price of $69.0 million, which will remain subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the September 2015 APA and October 2015 APA.

The fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities of the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions as of the acquisition dates is summarized as follows:

The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets as of the acquisition dates is as follows:

The goodwill of $10.6 million, $1.9 million and $8.0 million for the January 2016 Expansion Transactions, April 1, 2016 Expansion Transaction and April 29, 2016 Expansion Transactions, respectively, is primarily attributed to operational synergies and the workforce acquired. Goodwill of $7.1 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes for the January 2016 Expansion Transactions. No goodwill is expected to be deductible for the April 1, 2016 Expansion Transaction or the April 29, 2016 Expansion Transactions.

The Company has preliminarily allocated the purchase price of the May 2015 Expansion Territory, the October 2015 Expansion Territory, the Annapolis MRC and the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions to the individual acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The valuations are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained.

The anticipated range of amounts the Company could pay annually under the acquisition related contingent consideration arrangements for the 2015 Expansion Territories and the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions is between $10 million and $18 million.

On October 17, 2014, the Company and CCR entered into an agreement (the “Asset Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which CCR agreed to exchange certain assets of CCR relating to the marketing, promotion, distribution and sale of Coca‑Cola and other beverage products in the territory served by CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Lexington, Kentucky (the “Lexington Expansion Territory”), including the rights to produce such beverages in the Lexington Expansion Territory, in exchange for certain assets of the Company relating to the marketing, promotion, distribution and sale of Coca‑Cola and other beverage products in the territory served by the Company’s facilities and equipment located in Jackson, Tennessee, including the rights to produce such beverages in that territory (the “Asset Exchange Transaction”). The Company and CCR closed the Asset Exchange Transaction on May 1, 2015. The net assets received by the Company in the exchange, after deducting the value of certain retained assets and retained liabilities, was approximately $15.3 million.

The fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities related to the Lexington Expansion Territory as of the exchange date is summarized as follows:

The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets related to the Lexington Expansion Territory as of the exchange date is as follows:

The goodwill of $1.9 million related to the Lexington Expansion Territory is primarily attributed to the workforce of the territories and is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

During Q2 2016, the net assets received in the Asset Exchange Transaction, after deducting the value of certain retained assets and retained liabilities, increased by $4.2 million as a result of completing the post-closing adjustment under the Asset Exchange Agreement. In addition, the gain on the exchange was reduced by $0.7 million during the Q2 2016.

The carrying value of assets exchanged related to the Jackson, Tennessee territory exchanged in the Asset Exchange Transaction was $17.5 million, resulting in a gain on the exchange of $8.8 million in the second quarter of 2015.

The amount of goodwill and franchise rights allocated to the Jackson, Tennessee territory was determined using a relative fair value approach comparing the fair value of the Jackson, Tennessee territory to the fair value of the overall Nonalcoholic Beverages reporting unit.

YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions, 2015 Expansion Territories and 2015 Asset Exchange Agreement Financial Results

The financial results of the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions, 2015 Expansion Territories and Lexington Expansion Territory have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates. These territories contributed $287.1 million and $72.5 million in net sales and $16.0 million and $2.7 million in operating income during Q2 2016 and the quarter ended June 28, 2015 (“Q2 2015”), respectively. These territories contributed $429.6 million and $90.5 million in net sales and $17.3 million and $4.4 million in operating income during YTD 2016 and the first half of ~~these measurement~~2015 (“YTD 2015”).

The following table represents the unaudited pro forma net sales for the Company for the 2015 Expansion Territories and the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions. The pro forma combined net sales does not necessarily reflect what the combined Company’s net sales would have been had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of each period ~~adjustments~~presented. It also may not be useful in predicting the future financial results of the combined company. The actual results may differ significantly from the pro forma amounts reflected herein due to a variety of factors.

On August 24, 2015, the Company sold BYB Brands, Inc. (“BYB”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to The Coca‑Cola Company. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement dated July 22, 2015, the Company sold all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of BYB for a cash purchase price of $26.4 million. As a result of the sale, the Company recognized a gain of $22.7 million, which was ~~immaterial. These adjustments are included~~recorded to Gain on sale of business in the ~~opening~~consolidated financial statements in the third quarter of 2015. BYB contributed $9.8 million in net sales and $2.1 million in operating income during Q2 2015, and $16.7 million in net sales and $2.0 million in operating income during YTD 2015.

The growth in the inventory balance ~~sheets presented above.~~at July 3, 2016, as compared to January 3, 2016, and June 28, 2015, is primarily due to inventory acquired through the acquisitions of the 2015 Expansion Territories and the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions.

The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as follows:

Depreciation and amortization expense was $26.5 million and $18.9 million in Q2 2016 and in Q2 2015, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $49.9 million and $36.0 million in YTD 2016 and YTD 2015, respectively. These amounts included amortization expense for leased property under capital leases.

A reconciliation of the activity for franchise rights and goodwill for YTD 2015 and YTD 2016 follows:

In Thousands

Franchise rights

Goodwill

Total

Balance on December 28, 2014

520,672

106,220

626,892

YTD 2015 Expansion Territories

~~During the first nine months of 2015 (“YTD 2015”~~

5,425

Asset Exchange Transaction

6,868

6,906

Measurement period adjustment

(92

)~~, the Company closed~~

(92

)

Balance on ~~the acquisitions of the following distribution territories from CCR: Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee; Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana; and Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky (“YTD~~June 28, 2015 ~~Expansion Territories”). The details of the transactions are included below.~~

~~Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee Territory Acquisitions~~

On December 5, 2014, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “December 2014-I Asset Purchase Agreement”) related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee (the “January Expansion Territory”). The closing of this transaction occurred$

527,540

111,591

639,131

Balance on January ~~30, 2015 for a cash purchase price of $13.8 million, which will remain subject to adjustment until March 13,~~3, 2016 ~~in accordance with the terms and conditions of the December 2014-I Asset Purchase Agreement.~~

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~527,540

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana Territory Acquisitions~~

On December 17, 2014, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “December 2014-II Asset Purchase Agreement”) related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana (the “February$

117,954

645,494

YTD 2016 Expansion Territory”). The closing of this transaction occurred on February 27, 2015, for a cash purchase price of $19.8 million, which will remain subject to adjustment until April 7, 2016 in accordance with the terms and conditions of the December 2014-II Asset Purchase Agreement.Transactions

~~Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky Territory Acquisitions~~

On February 13, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “February Asset Purchase Agreement”) related to the territory served by CCR through CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky (the “May Expansion Territory”). The closing of this transaction occurred on May 1, 2015, for a cash purchase price of $7.5 million, which will remain subject to adjustment until June 12, 2016 in accordance with the terms and conditions of the February Asset Purchase Agreement.

~~The fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities of the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories are summarized as follows:~~

In Thousands

January
Expansion
Territory

February
Expansion
Territory

May
Expansion
Territory

Cash

$
59

$
105

$
45

Inventories

1,238

1,268

1,045

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,040

1,748

332

Property, plant and equipment

6,695

16,574

6,584

Other assets (including deferred taxes)

435

965

422

Goodwill

1,238

4,042

952

Other identifiable intangible assets

17,750

29,600

1,700

Total acquired assets

$
28,455

$
54,302

$
11,080

Current liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)

$
843

$
1,659

$
281

Other current liabilities

125

806

524

Other liabilities

0

992

10

Other liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)

13,729

31,052

2,748

Total assumed liabilities

$
14,697

$
34,509

$
3,563

~~The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets of the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories are as follows:~~

In Thousands

January
Expansion
Territory

February
Expansion
Territory

May
Expansion
Territory

Estimated
Useful Lives
Distribution agreements

$
17,200

$
28,400

$
1,500

40 years
Customer lists

550

1,200

200

12 years
Total

$
17,750

$
29,600

$
1,700

The goodwill of $1.2 million, $4.0 million and $1.0 million for the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories, respectively, is primarily attributed to the workforce. Goodwill of $0.2 million, $2.1 million and $0.1 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes for the January Expansion Territory, February Expansion Territory and May Expansion Territory, respectively. 20,528

The Company has preliminarily allocated the purchase price of the 2014 Expansion Territories and YTD 2015 Expansion Territories to the individual acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The valuations are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained, but any adjustments are not expected to be material.

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

The financial results of both the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories and the Lexington-for-Jackson territory (discussed below) have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates. These territories contributed $84.7 million in net sales and $1.3 million to operating income during the third quarter of 2015 (“Q3 2015”). These territories contributed $175.2 million in net sales and $5.7 million to operating income during YTD 2015.

The anticipated range of amounts the Company could pay annually under the acquisition related contingent consideration arrangements for the 2014 Expansion Territories and the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories is between $6 million and $11 million. As of September 27, 2015, the Company has recorded a liability of $93.1 million to reflect the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration related to the future sub-bottling payments. The contingent consideration was valued using a probability weighted discounted cash flow model based on internal forecasts and the weighted average cost of capital derived from market data. The contingent consideration is reassessed and adjusted to fair value each quarter through other income (expense). During YTD 2015, the Company recorded an unfavorable fair value adjustment to the contingent consideration liability of $3.0 million primarily due to a change in the risk-free interest rate.20,528

~~2015 Asset Exchange Agreement~~

On October 17, 2014, the Company and CCR entered into an agreement (the “Asset Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which CCR agreed to exchange certain assets of CCR relating to the marketing, promotion, distribution and sale of Coca-Cola and other beverage products in the territory served by CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Lexington, Kentucky (the “Lexington Expansion Territory”), including the rights to produce such beverages in the Lexington Expansion Territory, in exchange for certain assets of the Company relating to the marketing, promotion, distribution and sale of Coca-Cola and other beverage products in the territory served by the Company’s facilities and equipment located in Jackson, Tennessee, including the rights to produce such beverages in that territory. The Company and CCR closed the Asset Exchange Transaction

5,500

(682

)

4,818

Measurement period adjustment

1,956

Balance on May 1, 2015. The net assets received in the exchange, after deducting the value of certain retained assets and retained liabilities, was approximately $10.3 million, which was paid at closing. The value of the net assets exchanged remain subject to adjustment until June 12,July 3, 2016 ~~in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Asset Exchange Agreement.~~

~~The fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities related to the Lexington Expansion Territory as of the exchange date is summarized as follows:~~

Lexington

Expansion

In Thousands

Territory

Cash

$
56

Inventories

2,712

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

447

Property, plant and equipment

12,682

Other assets

48

Franchise rights

18,200

Goodwill

2,533

Other identifiable intangible assets

1,000

Total acquired assets

$
37,678

Current liabilities

$
926

Total assumed liabilities

$
926

533,040

~~The fair value of the acquired identifiable intangible assets related to the Lexington Expansion Territory as of the exchange date is as follows:~~

Lexington

Expansion

Estimated
In Thousands

Territory

Useful Lives
Franchise rights

$
18,200

Indefinite
Distribution agreements

200

40 years
Customer lists

800

12 years
Total

$
19,200

139,756

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

672,796

~~The goodwill related to the Lexington Expansion Territory is primarily attributed to the workforce of the territories. Goodwill of $2.5 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.~~

The Company has preliminarily allocated the purchase price for the Lexington Expansion Territory to the individual acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The valuations are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained, but any adjustments are not expected to be material.

The carrying value of assets exchanged related to the Jackson territory was $17.5 million, resulting in a gain on the exchange of $8.8 million. This gain was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item titled “Gain on exchange of franchise territory”. This amount is subject to change upon completion of the final determination value of the net assets exchanged in the transaction.

The amount of goodwill and franchise rights allocated to the Jackson territory was determined using a relative fair value approach comparing the fair value of the Jackson territory to the fair value of the overall Nonalcoholic Beverages reporting unit.

~~Asset Purchase Agreement for Next Phase Territories~~

On September 23, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement pursuant to which CCR will grant the Company exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of products owned and licensed by The Coca-Cola Company in the following additional territories served by CCR: (i) eastern and northern Virginia, (ii) the entire state of Maryland, (iii) the District of Columbia, and (iv) parts of Delaware, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and West Virginia (the “Next Phase Territories”). The Next Phase Territories are the first phase of the proposed franchise territory expansion contemplated by the non-binding letter of intent entered into by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company on May 12, 2015.

Pursuant to such asset purchase agreement, the Company will (i) purchase from CCR in a series of closings certain rights relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of cross-licensed brands currently distributed by CCR in the Next Phase Territories and certain assets related to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of both The Coca-Cola Company brands and cross-licensed brands currently distributed by CCR in the Next Phase Territories and (ii) assume certain liabilities and obligations of CCR relating to the business currently conducted by CCR in the Next Phase Territories. It is a condition to each closing that the Company and CCR enter into a CBA with respect to the portion of the Next Phase Territories that is the subject of such closing that is substantially the same as the form of CBA currently in effect in the 2014 Expansion Territories and YTD 2015 Expansion Territories. Concurrent with their execution of the asset purchase agreement for the Next Phase Territories, the Company, CCR and The Coca-Cola Company executed a territory conversion agreement, which provides that each of the CBAs executed by the Company, including the CBAs for each of the Next Phase Territories, as well as certain other bottling agreements would be amended, restated and converted (upon the occurrence of certain events) to a new and final comprehensive beverage agreement.

~~Sale of BYB Brands, Inc.~~

On August 24, 2015, the Company sold BYB Brands, Inc. (“BYB”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to The Coca-Cola Company. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement dated July 22, 2015, the Company sold all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of BYB for a cash purchase price of $26.4 million. As a result of the sale, the Company recognized a gain of $22.7 million in Q3 2015, which was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item titled “Gain on sale of business.” BYB contributed $21.8 million and $24.5 million in net sales and $1.8 million and $0.3 million in operating income in YTD 2015 and the first nine months of 2014 (“YTD 2014”), respectively.

~~3. Inventories~~

Sept. 27,

Dec. 28,

Sept. 28,

In Thousands

2015

2014

2014

Finished products

$
65,214

$
42,526

$
50,732

Manufacturing materials

8,658

10,133

9,796

Plastic shells, plastic pallets and other inventories

20,276

18,081

19,595

Total inventories

$
94,148

$
70,740

$
80,123

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

The growth in the inventory balance at September 27, 2015 as compared to December 28, 2014 and September 28, 2014 is primarily due to inventory acquired through the acquisitions of the 2014 Expansion Territories and YTD 2015 Expansion Territories.

~~4. Property, Plant and Equipment~~

~~The principal categories and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment were as follows:~~

Sept. 27,

Dec. 28,

Sept. 28,

Estimated
In Thousands

2015

2014

2014

Useful Lives
Land

$
16,664

$
14,762

$
14,161

Buildings

125,196

120,533

115,844

8-50 years
Machinery and equipment

161,960

154,897

153,538

5-20 years
Transportation equipment

224,426

190,216

177,759

4-20 years
Furniture and fixtures

52,538

45,623

43,969

3-10 years
Cold drink dispensing equipment

381,009

345,391

333,984

5-17 years
Leasehold and land improvements

84,413

75,104

74,176

5-20 years
Software for internal use

94,609

91,156

86,646

3-10 years
Construction in progress

18,677

6,528

5,686

Total property, plant and equipment, at cost

1,159,492

1,044,210

1,005,763

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

712,709

685,978

678,525

Property, plant and equipment, net

$
446,783

$
358,232

$
327,238

Depreciation and amortization expense was $20.3 million and $15.1 million in Q3 2015 and in the third quarter of 2014 (“Q3 2014”), respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $56.3 million and $44.4 million in YTD 2015 and YTD 2014, respectively. These amounts included amortization expense for leased property under capital leases.

~~5. Franchise Rights and Goodwill~~

Sept. 27,

Dec. 28,

Sept. 28,

In Thousands

2015

2014

2014

Franchise rights

$
527,540

$
520,672

$
520,672

Goodwill

113,835

106,220

103,294

Total franchise rights and goodwill

$
641,375

$
626,892

$
623,966

During YTD 2015 and YTD 2014, the Company acquired $6.2 million and $1.2 million of goodwill related to the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories and 2014 Expansion Territories, respectively. In addition to the 2015 goodwill acquired, the Company also recorded measurement period adjustments related to the 2014 Expansion Territories of $1.1 million. In addition, as part of the Lexington-for-Jackson exchange during YTD 2015, the Company added $2.5 million of goodwill related to the Lexington Expansion Territory and reduced goodwill by $2.2 million related to the Jackson territory.

Additionally, as part of the Lexington-for-Jackson exchange, the Company added $18.2 million of franchise rights related to the Lexington Expansion Territory and reduced franchise rights by $11.3 million related to the Jackson territory.

The Company’s goodwill and franchise rights reside entirely within the Nonalcoholic Beverage segment. The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill as of the first day of the fourth quarter. During YTD 2016, the Company did not experience any triggering events or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying amounts of the Company’s franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair values.

In Q2 2016, the Company recorded $5.5 million in franchise rights for the Lexington Expansion Territory.

During YTD 2016, the Company acquired $22.8 million of distribution agreement intangible assets and $2.0 million of customer lists intangible assets related to the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions.

The Company had capital lease obligations of $52.3 million, $55.8 million, and $59.2 million as of July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016, and June 28, 2015, respectively. The Company mitigates its financing risk by using multiple financial institutions and enters into credit arrangements only with institutions with investment grade credit ratings. The Company monitors counterparty credit ratings on an ongoing basis.

In October 2014, the Company entered into a $350 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). In April 2015, the Company exercised the accordion feature of the Revolving Credit Facility, thereby increasing the aggregate availability by $100 million to $450 million. The Revolving Credit Facility has a scheduled maturity date of October 16, 2019 and up to $50 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin, dependent on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing. At the Company’s current credit ratings, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of 0.15% of the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility includes two financial covenants: a cash flow/fixed charges ratio and a funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio, each as defined in the agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at July 3, 2016. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources.

In November 2015, the Company issued $350 million of unsecured 3.8% Senior Notes due 2025. The notes were issued at 99.975% of par, which resulted in a discount on the notes of approximately $0.1 million. Total debt issuance costs for these notes totaled $3.2 million. The proceeds plus cash on hand were used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company refinanced its $100 million of senior notes, which matured in April 2015, with borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.

On June 7, 2016, the Company entered into a term loan agreement for a senior unsecured term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) in the aggregate principal amount of $300 million, maturing June 7, 2021. The Company may request additional term loans under the agreement, provided the Company’s aggregate borrowings under the Term Loan Facility do not exceed $500 million. Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin, dependent on the Company’s credit rating, at the Company’s option. The Term Loan Facility includes two financial covenants: a consolidated cash flow/fixed charges ratio and a consolidated funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio, each as defined in the agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of July 3, 2016. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. The Company used $210 million of the proceeds from the Term Loan Facility to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company then used the remaining proceeds, as well as borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, to repay the $164.8 million of Senior Notes that matured on June 15, 2016.

The Company is subject to the risk of increased costs arising from adverse changes in certain commodity prices. In the normal course of business, the Company manages these risks through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivative instruments. The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under GAAP and are used as “economic hedges” to manage commodity price risk. Derivative instruments held are marked to market on

a monthly basis and recognized in earnings consistent with the expense classification of the underlying hedged item. Settlements of derivative agreements are included in cash flows from operating activities on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows.

The Company uses several different financial institutions for commodity derivative instruments to minimize the concentration of credit risk. While the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by these parties.

The following summarizes Q2 2016, Q2 2015, YTD 2016 and YTD 2015 pre-tax changes in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivative financial instruments and the classification of such changes in the consolidated statements of operations.

The following table summarizes the fair values and classification in the consolidated balance sheets of derivative instruments held by the Company:

The Company has master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative transactions. Accordingly, the net amounts of derivative assets are recognized in either prepaid expenses and other current assets or other assets in the consolidated balance sheet and the net amounts of derivative liabilities are recognized in other accrued liabilities or other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company had gross derivative assets of $1.2 million and gross derivative liabilities of $0.8 million as of July 3, 2016. The Company had gross derivative assets of $0.2 million and gross derivative liabilities of $3.6 million as of January 3, 2016. The Company had gross derivative assets of $1.8 million and gross derivative liabilities of $1.9 million as of June 28, 2015.

The Company’s outstanding commodity derivative agreements as of July 3, 2016 had a notional amount of $39.3 million and a latest maturity date of December 2017. The Company’s outstanding commodity derivative agreements as of January3, 2016 had a notional amount of $64.9 million and a latest maturity date of December 2017. The Company’s outstanding commodity derivative agreements as of June 28, 2015 had a notional amount of $85.6 million and a latest maturity date of December 2016.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of its financial instruments:

Instrument

Method and Assumptions

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.

Public Debt Securities

The fair values of the Company’s public debt securities are based on estimated current market prices.

Non-Public Variable Rate Debt

The carrying amounts of the Company’s ~~franchise rights or goodwill exceeded~~variable rate borrowings approximate their fair ~~values.~~values due to variable interest rates with short reset periods.

Deferred Compensation Plan Assets/Liabilities

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~6. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets~~

Sept. 27,

Dec. 28,

Sept. 28,

Estimated
In Thousands

2015

2014

2014

Useful Lives
Distribution agreements

$
99,209

$
54,909

$
15,509

20-40 years
Customer lists and other identifiable intangible assets

10,188

7,438

6,838

12-20 years
Total other identifiable intangible assets

109,397

62,347

22,347

Less: Accumulated amortization

7,309

5,199

5,243

Other identifiable intangible assets, net

$
102,088

$
57,148

$
17,104

~~During YTD 2015, the Company acquired $47.1 million~~The fair values of ~~distribution agreement intangible~~deferred compensation plan assets and ~~$2.0 million of customer lists intangible assets related to~~liabilities, which are held in mutual funds, are based upon the YTD 2015 Expansion Territories. Additionally, during Q3 2015 the Company recorded measurement period adjustments reducing distribution agreement intangible assets $3.0 million related to the 2014 Expansion Territories. During YTD 2015, as a result of the Lexington-for-Jackson exchange, the Company also acquired distribution agreement intangible assets of $0.2 million and customer lists intangible assets of $0.8 million related to the Lexington Expansion Territory.

~~During YTD 2014, the Company acquired $13.2 million of distribution agreement intangible assets and $0.6 million of customer lists intangible assets related to the 2014 Expansion Territories.~~

~~7. Other Accrued Liabilities~~

Sept. 27,

Dec. 28,

Sept. 28,

In Thousands

2015

2014

2014

Accrued marketing costs

$
19,359

$
16,141

$
14,122

Accrued insurance costs

22,795

21,055

21,603

Accrued taxes (other than income taxes)

3,988

2,430

3,228

Employee benefit plan accruals

15,235

12,517

12,991

Checks and transfers yet to be presented for payment from
zero balance cash accounts

10,074

2,324

10,472

All other accrued liabilities

21,647

14,308

11,440

Total other accrued liabilities

$
93,098

$
68,775

$
73,856

~~8. Debt~~

The Company has historically obtained its debt financing, other than capital leases, from various sources including banks and the public markets. As of September 27, 2015, the Company’s total outstanding balance of debt and capital lease obligations was $606.4 million of which $273.9 million was financed through publicly offered debt. The Company had capital lease obligations of $57.5 million as of September 27, 2015. The Company mitigates its financing risk by using multiple financial institutions and enters into credit arrangements only with institutions with investment grade credit ratings. The Company monitors counterparty credit ratings on an ongoing basis.

On October 16, 2014, the Company entered into a $350 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) which amended and restated the Company’s existing $200 million five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement. On April 27, 2015, the Company exercised the accordion feature of the Revolving Credit Facility, thereby increasing the aggregate availability by $100 million to $450 million. The Revolving Credit Facility has a scheduled maturity date of October 16, 2019 and up to $50 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin, dependent on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing. At the Company’s current credit ratings, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of .15% of the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility includes two financial covenants: a cash flow/fixed charges ratio (“fixed charges coverage ratio”) and a funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio (“operating cash flow ratio”), each as defined in the agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at September 27, 2015. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources.

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

On September 27, 2015, the Company had $275.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility and had $175.0 million available to meet its cash requirements. On December 28, 2014, the Company had $71.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility. On September 28, 2014, the Company had $50.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Company’s prior revolving credit facility.

On September 28, 2014, the Company had $20.0 million outstanding on an uncommitted line of credit at a weighted average interest rate of 0.90%. On October 31, 2014, the Company terminated this uncommitted line of credit and refinanced the outstanding balance with additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Company refinanced its $100 million of senior notes, which matured in April 2015, with borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. The Company has $164.8 million of senior notes maturing in June 2016, which the Company intends to refinance.

As of September 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and September 28, 2014, the Company had a weighted average interest rate of 4.4%, 5.8% and 5.8%, respectively, for its outstanding debt and capital lease obligations. The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 4.3% and 5.7% for Q3 2015 and Q3 2014, respectively. The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 4.6% and 5.8% for YTD 2015 and YTD 2014, respectively. As of September 27, 2015, $275.0 million of the Company’s debt and capital lease obligations of $606.4 million were subject to changes in short-term interest rates.

~~9. Derivative Financial Instruments~~

~~The following summarizes Q3 2015 and Q3 2014 pre-tax changes in the fair~~ value of the ~~Company’s commodity derivative financial instruments and~~securities held within the ~~classification of such changes in the consolidated statements of operations.~~mutual funds.

Acquisition Related Contingent Consideration

Third Quarter

In Thousands

Classification of Gain (Loss)

2015

2014

Commodity hedges

Cost of sales

$
(1,438
)

$
(319
)
Commodity hedges

Selling, delivery and administrative expenses

(692
)

0

Total

$
(2,130
)

$
(319
)

The following summarizes YTD 2015 and YTD 2014 pre-tax changes in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivative financial instruments and the classification of such changes in the consolidated statements of operations.

First Nine Months

In Thousands

Classification of Gain (Loss)

2015

2014

Commodity hedges

Cost of sales

$
(2,119
)

$
552

Commodity hedges

Selling, delivery and administrative expenses

(117
)

0

Total

$
(2,236
)

$
552

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~The following table summarizes the fair values and classification in the consolidated balance sheets of derivative instruments held by the Company:~~

Balance Sheet

Sept. 27,

Dec. 28,

Sept. 28,

In Thousands

Classification

2015

2014

2014

Assets:

Commodity hedges at fair market value

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

$
0

$
0

$
552

Commodity hedges at fair market value

Other assets

39

0

0

Total assets

$
39

$
0

$
552

Liabilities:

Commodity hedges at fair market value

Other accrued liabilities

$
1,918

$
0

$
0

Commodity hedges at fair market value

Other liabilities

357

0

0

Total liabilities

$
2,275

$
0

$
0

The Company has master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative transactions. Accordingly, the net amounts of derivative assets are recognized in either prepaid expenses and other current assets or other assets in the consolidated balance sheet at September 27, 2015 and the net amounts of derivative liabilities are recognized in either other accrued liabilities or other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at September 27, 2015. The Company had gross derivative assets of $0.8 million and gross derivative liabilities of $3.0 million as of September 27, 2015. The Company did not have any outstanding derivative transactions at December 28, 2014. The Company did not have any offsetting derivative transactions with its counterparties on September 28, 2014, and, accordingly, the gross amounts of derivative assets are recognized in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet at September 28, 2014.

~~The Company’s outstanding commodity derivative agreements as of September 27, 2015 had a notional amount of $75.9 million and a latest maturity date of December 2016.~~

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments~~

~~The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of its financial instruments:~~

~~Instrument~~

~~Method and Assumptions~~

~~Cash and Cash Equivalents,~~

~~Accounts Receivable and~~

~~Accounts Payable~~

~~Public Debt Securities~~

~~The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these items.~~

~~The fair values of the Company’s public debt securities are based on estimated current market prices.~~

~~Non-Public Variable Rate Debt~~

~~The carrying amounts of the Company’s variable rate borrowings approximate their fair values due to variable interest rates with short reset periods.~~

~~Deferred Compensation Plan Assets/Liabilities~~

~~The fair values of deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, which are held in mutual funds, are based upon the quoted market value of the securities held within the mutual funds.~~

~~Acquisition Related Contingent Consideration~~

~~Derivative Financial Instruments~~

The fair values of acquisition related contingent consideration are ~~based on internal forecasts and the weighted average cost of capital derived from market data.~~

The fair values for the Company’s commodity hedging agreements are based on current settlement values at each balance sheet date. The fair values of the commodity hedging agreements at each balance sheet date represent the estimated amounts the Company would have received or paid upon termination of these agreements. Credit risk related to the derivative financial instruments is managed by requiring high standards for its counterparties and periodic settlements. The Company considers nonperformance risk in determining the fair value of derivative financial instruments.

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's debt, deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, acquisition related contingent consideration and derivative financial instruments were as follows:

Sept. 27, 2015

Dec. 28, 2014

Sept. 28, 2014

Carrying

Fair

Carrying

Fair

Carrying

Fair

In Thousands

Amount

Value

Amount

Value

Amount

Value

Public debt securities

$
(273,912
)

$
(294,200
)

$
(373,759
)

$
(404,400
)

$
(373,709
)

$
(406,800
)
Non-public variable rate debt

(275,000
)

(275,000
)

(71,000
)

(71,000
)

(70,000
)

(70,000
)
Deferred compensation plan assets

19,660

19,660

18,580

18,580

18,015

18,015

Deferred compensation plan liabilities

(19,660
)

(19,660
)

(18,580
)

(18,580
)

(18,015
)

(18,015
)
Commodity hedging agreements-assets

39

39

0

0

552

552

Commodity hedging agreements-liabilities

(2,275
)

(2,275
)

0

0

0

0

Acquisition related contingent consideration

(93,064
)

(93,064
)

(46,850
)

(46,850
)

(13,000
)

(13,000
)

~~GAAP requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:~~

~~Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~

~~Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.~~

~~Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.~~

~~Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated~~

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

~~The following table summarizes, by assets and liabilities, the valuation of the Company’s deferred compensation plan, commodity hedging agreements and acquisition related contingent consideration:~~

Sept. 27, 2015

Dec. 28, 2014

Sept. 28, 2014

In Thousands

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

Deferred compensation plan assets

$
19,660

$
18,580

$
18,015

Commodity hedging agreements

$
39

$
0

$
552

Liabilities

Deferred compensation plan liabilities

19,660

18,580

18,015

Commodity hedging agreements

2,275

0

0

Acquisition related contingent
consideration

$
93,064

$
46,850

$
13,000

~~The fair value estimates of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2. Public debt securities are valued using quoted market prices of the debt or debt with similar characteristics.~~

The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other senior level employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level 1). The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment assets.

The fair values of the Company’s commodity hedging agreements are based upon rates from public commodity exchanges that are observable and quoted periodically over the full term of the agreement and are considered Level 2 items.

As part of the 2015 and 2014 territory acquisitions, the Company will make a quarterly sub-bottling payment to CCR on a continuing basis for the grant of exclusive rights to distribute, promote, market and sell specified covered beverages and beverage products in the acquired territories. This acquisition related contingent consideration is valued using a probability weighted discounted cash flow model based on internal forecasts and the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) derived from market ~~data, which~~data.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The fair values for the Company’s commodity hedging agreements are ~~considered Level 3 inputs. Each reporting period,~~based on current settlement values at each balance sheet date. The fair values of the commodity hedging agreements at each balance sheet date represent the estimated amounts the Company ~~adjusts its contingent consideration liability~~would have received or paid upon termination of these agreements. Credit risk related to the ~~territory expansion to fair value~~derivative financial instruments is managed by discounting future expected sub-bottling payments required under the CBAs using the Company’s estimated WACC. These future expected sub-bottling payments extend through the life of the related distribution assets acquiredrequiring high standards for its counterparties and periodic settlements. The Company considers nonperformance risk in ~~each expansion territory, which is generally~~ 40 ~~years. As a result,~~determining the fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration liability is impacted by the Company’s WACC, management’s estimate of the amounts that will be paid in the future under the CBAs, and current sub-bottling payments (all Level 3 inputs). Changes in any of these Level 3 inputs, particularly the underlying risk-free interest rate used to estimate the Company’s WACC, could result in material changes to the fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration and could materially impact the amount of noncash expense (or income) recorded each reporting period.derivative financial instruments.

~~The acquisition related contingent consideration is the Company’s only Level 3 asset or liability. A reconciliation of the activity is~~

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's debt, deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, commodity hedging agreements and acquisition related contingent consideration were as follows:

GAAP requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

The following table summarizes, by assets and liabilities, the valuation of the Company’s deferred compensation plan, commodity hedging agreements and acquisition related contingent consideration:

	July 3, 2016						January 3, 2016						June 28, 2015
In Thousands	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Deferred compensation plan assets	$	22,308	$	-	$	-	$	20,755	$	-	$	-	$	20,466	$	-	$	-
Commodity hedging agreements		-		662		-		-		3		-		-		575		-
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation plan liabilities		22,308		-		-		20,755		-		-		20,466		-		-
Commodity hedging agreements		-		291		-		-		3,442		-		-		681		-
Public debt securities		-		495,700		-		-		645,400		-		-		297,700		-
Non-public variable rate debt		-		375,000		-		-		-		-		-		290,000		-
Acquisition related contingent consideration		-		-		228,768		-		-		136,570		-		-		94,068

The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain executives and other highly compensated employees. The investment assets are held in mutual funds. The fair value of the mutual funds is based on the quoted market value of the securities held within the funds (Level 1). The related deferred compensation liability represents the fair value of the investment assets.

The fair value estimates of the Company’s debt are classified as Level 2. Public and non-public debt is valued using quoted market prices of the debt or debt with similar characteristics.

Under the CBAs the Company entered into in 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company makes a quarterly sub-bottling payment to CCR on a continuing basis for the grant of exclusive rights to distribute, promote, market and sell specified covered beverages and beverage products in the acquired territories. This acquisition related contingent consideration is valued using a probability weighted discounted cash flow model based on internal forecasts and the WACC derived from market data, which are considered Level 3 inputs. Each reporting period, the Company adjusts its acquisition related contingent consideration liability related to the territory expansion to fair value by discounting future expected sub-bottling payments required under the CBAs using the Company’s estimated WACC. These future expected sub-bottling payments extend through the life of the related distribution assets acquired in each expansion territory, which is generally 40 years. As a result, the fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration liability is impacted by the Company’s WACC, management’s estimate of the amounts that will be paid in the future under the CBAs, and current sub-bottling payments (all Level 3 inputs). Changes in any of these Level 3 inputs, particularly the underlying risk-free interest rate used to estimate the Company’s WACC, could result in material changes to the fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration and could materially impact the amount of noncash expense (or income) recorded each reporting period.

The acquisition related contingent consideration is the Company’s only Level 3 asset or liability. A reconciliation of the activity is as follows:

As of July 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, the Company has recorded a liability of $228.8 million and $94.1 million, respectively, to reflect the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration related to the future sub-bottling payments. The contingent consideration was valued using a probability weighted discounted cash flow model based on internal forecasts and the WACC derived from market data. The contingent consideration is reassessed and adjusted to fair value each quarter through other income (expense) on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. During Q2 2016 and YTD 2016, the Company recorded an unfavorable fair value adjustment to the contingent consideration liability of $16.3 million and $33.4 million, respectively, primarily due to updated

projections and a change in the risk-free interest rate. During Q2 2015 and YTD 2015, the Company recorded a favorable fair value adjustment to the contingent consideration liability of $6.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively, primarily due to updated projections and a change in the risk-free interest rate.

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Levels in any period presented.

The Company is a member of South Atlantic Canners, Inc. (“SAC”), a manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase 17.5 million cases of finished product on an annual basis through June 2024. The Company is also a member of Southeastern Container (“Southeastern”), a plastic bottle manufacturing cooperative from which it is obligated to purchase at least 80% of its requirements of plastic bottles for certain designated territories. The Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities.

The Company guarantees a portion of SAC’s and Southeastern’s debt. The amounts guaranteed were $32.5 million, $30.6 million and $33.7 million as of July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively. The Company holds no assets as collateral against these guarantees, the fair value of which is immaterial. The guarantees relate to the debt of SAC and Southeastern, which resulted primarily from the purchase of production equipment and facilities. These guarantees expire at various dates through 2023. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of Coca‑Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill its commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling prices of its products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Company’s guarantees. In the event either of these cooperatives fails to fulfill its commitments under the related debt, the Company would be responsible for payments to the lenders up to the level of the guarantees. If these cooperatives had borrowed up to their aggregate borrowing capacity, the Company’s maximum exposure under these guarantees on July 3, 2016, would have been $23.9 million for SAC and $25.3 million for Southeastern. The Company’s maximum total exposure, including its equity investment, would have been $28.0 million for SAC and $43.5 million for Southeastern.

The Company has standby letters of credit, primarily related to its property and casualty insurance programs. Letters of credit totaled $29.7 million, $26.9 million and $26.4 million on July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively.

The Company participates in long-term marketing contractual arrangements with certain prestige properties, athletic venues and other locations. The future payments related to these contractual arrangements as of July 3, 2016 amounted to $72.6 million and expire at various dates through 2026.

The Company is involved in various claims and legal proceedings which have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims and legal proceedings, management believes the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, cash flows or results of operations of the Company. No material amount of loss in excess of recorded amounts is believed to be reasonably possible as a result of these claims and legal proceedings.

The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, for YTD 2016 and YTD 2015 was 40.1% and 37.4%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was driven primarily by an increase in the state tax rate applied to the deferred tax assets and liabilities driven by the new territories, a decrease to the favorable manufacturing deduction (as a percentage of pre-tax income) caused by new territories which do not qualify for the deduction, and lower pre‑tax book income. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes minus net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, for YTD 2016 and YTD 2015 was 49.8% and 39.5%, respectively.

As of July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, the Company had $3.1 million, $2.9 million and $3.2 million, respectively, of uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest, all of which would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. While it is expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions may change in the next 12 months, the Company does not expect any change to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Prior tax years beginning in year 2012 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, and various tax years beginning in year 1998 remain open to examination by certain state tax jurisdictions due to loss carryforwards.

During Q1 2016, the Company revalued its existing net deferred tax liabilities for the effects which resulted from the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions. The YTD 2016 impact of this revaluation was an increase to the recorded income tax expense of $0.8 million.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of adjustments relative to the Company’s pension and postretirement medical benefit plans and foreign currency translation adjustments required for a subsidiary of the Company that performs data analysis and provides consulting services outside the United States.

A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Q2 2016 and Q2 2015 is as follows:

A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for YTD 2016 and YTD 2015 is as follows:

In Thousands	Net Pension Activity		Net Postretirement Benefits Activity			Total
Second Quarter 2016:
Cost of sales	$	75	$	(38	)	$	37
Selling, delivery & administrative expenses		672		(214	)		458
Subtotal pre-tax		747		(252	)		495
Income tax expense		287		(97	)		190
Total after tax effect	$	460	$	(155	)	$	305

Second Quarter 2015:
Cost of sales	$	88	$	(17	)	$	71
Selling, delivery & administrative expenses		716		(105	)		611
Subtotal pre-tax		804		(122	)		682
Income tax expense		310		(47	)		263
Total after tax effect	$	494	$	(75	)	$	419

First Half 2016:
Cost of sales	$	150	$	(76	)	$	74
Selling, delivery & administrative expenses		1,345		(429	)		916
Subtotal pre-tax		1,495		(505	)		990
Income tax expense		576		(194	)		382
Total after tax effect	$	919	$	(311	)	$	608

First Half 2015:
Cost of sales	$	169	$	(33	)	$	136
Selling, delivery & administrative expenses		1,440		(212	)		1,228
Subtotal pre-tax		1,609		(245	)		1,364
Income tax expense		621		(94	)		527
Total after tax effect	$	988	$	(151	)	$	837

On March 8, 2016, and March 3, 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors determined that 40,000 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock should be issued in each year pursuant to a performance unit award agreement to J. Frank Harrison, III, in connection with his services in 2015 and 2014, respectively, as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As permitted under the terms of the performance unit award agreement, 19,080 of such shares were settled in cash in both 2016 and 2015 to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of the performance units.

Compensation expense for the performance unit award agreement recognized in YTD 2016 was $2.9 million, which was based upon a Common Stock share price of $144.82 on July 1, 2016. Compensation expense for the performance unit award agreement recognized in YTD 2015 was $3.0 million, which was based upon a Common Stock share price of $148.98 on June 26, 2015.

The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in YTD 2016 and YTD 2015 was due to the issuance of the 20,920 shares of Class B Common Stock related to the performance unit award agreement during the first quarter of ~~income tax expense at the statutory federal rate to actual income tax expense.~~

As of September 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and September 28, 2014 the Company had $2.7 million, $2.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively, of uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest, all of which would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. Total accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions is immaterial in all periods presented. While it is expected that the amount of uncertain tax positions may change in the next 12 months, the Company does not expect any change to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In Q3 2015, the Company decreased its valuation allowance by $1.1 million of which all was a decrease to income tax expense. The decrease was due primarily to the Company’s assessment of its ability to use certain net operating loss carryforwards due to the sale of BYB. Also during Q3 2015, a state tax legislation target was met that caused a reduction to the corporate tax rate in that state from 5% to 4%, effective January 1, 2016. This reduction in the state corporate tax rate decreased the Company’s income tax expense by approximately $1.2 million in Q3 2015 due to the impact on the Company’s net deferred tax liabilities.

In Q3 2015, the Company reduced its liability for uncertain tax positions by $0.6 million, of which all was a decrease to income tax expense. This reduction was primarily due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.

~~The gains on the exchange of franchise territory and sale of BYB did not have a significant impact on the effective income tax rate for either Q3 2015 or YTD 2015.~~

~~A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Q3 2015 and Q3 2014 is as follows:~~

~~A summary of accumulated other comprehensive loss for YTD 2015 and YTD 2014 is as follows:~~

In Thousands

Net Pension
Activity

Net Postretirement
Benefits Activity

Total

Q3 2015

Cost of sales

$
88

$
(17
)

$
71

Selling, delivery & administrative expenses

716

(106
)

610

Subtotal pre-tax

804

(123
)

681

Income tax expense

307

(47
)

260

Total after tax effect

$
497

$
(76
)

$
421

Q3 2014

Cost of sales

$
83

$
24

$
107

Selling, delivery & administrative expenses

376

161

537

Subtotal pre-tax

459

185

644

Income tax expense

177

72

249

Total after tax effect

$
282

$
113

$
395

YTD 2015

Cost of sales

$
265

$
(52
)

$
213

Selling, delivery & administrative expenses

2,148

(316
)

1,832

Subtotal pre-tax

2,413

(368
)

2,045

Income tax expense

928

(141
)

787

Total after tax effect

$
1,485

$
(227
)

$
1,258

YTD 2014

Cost of sales

$
238

$
72

$
310

Selling, delivery & administrative expenses

1,083

483

1,566

Subtotal pre-tax

1,321

555

1,876

Income tax expense

510

216

726

Total after tax effect

$
811

$
339

$
1,150

Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in YTD 2015 was $5.7 million, which was based upon a common stock share price of $189.13 on September 25, 2015. Compensation expense for the Performance Unit Award Agreement recognized in YTD 2014 was $2.3 million, which was based upon a common stock share price of $75.74 on September 26, 2014.

On March 3, 2015 and March 4, 2014, the Compensation Committee determined that 40,000 shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock should be issued in each year pursuant to a Performance Unit Award Agreement to J. Frank Harrison, III, in connection with his services in 2014 and 2013, respectively, as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. As permitted under the terms of the Performance Unit Award Agreement, 19,080 and 19,100 of such shares were settled in cash in 2015 and 2014, respectively, to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of the performance units.

The increase in the total number of shares outstanding in YTD 2015 and YTD 2014 was due to the issuance of the 20,920 and 20,900 shares, respectively, of Class B Common Stock related to the Performance Unit Award Agreement in each year.

All benefits under the primary Company-sponsored pension plan were frozen in 2006 and no benefits have accrued to participants after this date. The Company also sponsors a pension plan for certain employees under collective bargaining agreements. Benefits

under the pension plan for collectively bargained employees are determined in accordance with negotiated formulas for the respective participants. Contributions to the plans are based on actuarial determined amounts and are limited to the amounts currently deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company ~~contributed $10.5 million~~did not make contributions to the Company-sponsored pension plans during YTD ~~2015.~~2016. Anticipated contributions for the two Company-sponsored pension plans will be in the range of $0$10 million to $2$12 million during the remainder of ~~2015.~~2016.

The Company provides postretirement benefits for a portion of its current employees. The Company recognizes the cost of postretirement benefits, which consist principally of medical benefits, during employees’ periods of active service. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefits in the future.

Certain employees of the Company participate in a multi-employer pension plan, the Employers-Teamsters Local Union Nos. 175 and 505 Pension Fund ~~(“the Plan”~~(the “Plan”), to which the Company makes monthly contributions on behalf of such employees. The Plan was certified by the Plan’s actuary as being in “critical” status for the plan year beginning January 1, 2013. As a result, the Plan adopted a “Rehabilitation Plan” effective January 1, 2015. The Company agreed and incorporated such agreement in the renewal of the collective bargaining agreement with the union, effective April 28, 2014, to participate in the Rehabilitation Plan. The Company increased its contribution rates to the Plan effective January 2015 with additional increases occurring annually to support the Rehabilitation Plan.

There would likely be a withdrawal liability in the event the Company withdraws from its participation in the Plan. The Company’s withdrawal liability was reported by the Plan’s actuary ~~as of April 2014~~ to be approximately $4.5 million. The Company does not currently anticipate withdrawing from the Plan.

The Company’s business consists primarily of the production, marketing and distribution of nonalcoholic beverages of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company, which is the sole owner of the secret formulas under which the primary components (either concentrate or syrup) of its soft drink products are manufactured. As of ~~September 27, 2015,~~July 3, 2016, The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company ~~had a 34.8% interest in~~owned approximately 35% of the Company’s total outstanding Common Stock, representing ~~5.0%~~approximately 5% of the total voting power of the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common

Stock voting together as a single class. As long as The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company holds the number of shares of Common Stock that it currently owns, it has the right to have its designee proposed by the Company for the nomination to the Company’s Board of Directors, and J. Frank Harrison III, the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and trustees of certain trusts established for the benefit of certain relatives of J. Frank Harrison, Jr., have agreed to vote their shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock which they control in favor of such designee. The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company does not own any shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company.

The following table and the subsequent descriptions summarize the significant transactions between the Company and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company:

The Company has a production arrangement with CCR to buy and sell finished ~~products at cost.~~products. Sales to CCR under this arrangement were ~~$24.2~~$32.5 million and ~~$45.3~~$17.3 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Purchases from CCR under this arrangement were ~~$154.4~~$139.5 million and ~~$44.0~~$94.1 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Prior to the sale of BYB to The Coca‑Cola Company, CCR ~~distributes~~distributed one of the Company’s brands ~~developed by the Company (Tum-E Yummies)~~(“Tum-E Yummies”). Total sales to CCR for ~~this brand~~Tum-E Yummies were ~~$14.8 million and $17.4~~$11.1 million in YTD ~~2015 and YTD 2014, respectively.~~2015. During Q3the third quarter of 2015, the Company sold BYB, the subsidiary that owned and distributed ~~the Company’s brand (Tum-E Yummies),~~Tum-E Yummies, to The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and recorded a gain of $22.7 million on the sale. The Company continues to distribute Tum-E Yummies following the sale. In addition, the Company transports product for CCR to the Company’s and other ~~Coca-Cola bottler’s~~Coca‑Cola bottlers’ locations. Total sales to CCR for transporting CCR’s product were ~~$11.3~~$11.5 million and ~~$1.6~~$6.7 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

The acquisitions and divestitures with CCR and The Coca‑Cola Company described above in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements are incorporated herein by reference. As described above in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company and CCR have entered into and closed the following asset purchase agreements relating to certain territories previously served by CCR’s facilities and equipment located in these territories:

As part of the distribution territory closings under these asset purchase agreements, the Company signed CBAs which have terms of ten years and are renewable by the Company indefinitely for successive additional terms of ten years each unless earlier terminated as provided therein. Under the CBAs, the Company ~~will make~~makes a quarterly sub-bottling payment to CCR on a continuing basis for the grant of exclusive rights to distribute, promote, market and sell the authorized brands of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and related products in the Expansion Territories. The quarterly sub-bottling payment ~~will be~~is based on sales of certain beverages and beverage products that are sold under the same trademarks that identify a covered beverage, beverage product or certain cross-licensed brands. As of ~~September 27,~~July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, the Company had recorded a liability of ~~$93.1~~$228.8 million, $136.6 million and $94.1 million, respectively, to reflect the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration related to the future sub-bottling payments. Payments ~~to CCR under the CBAs~~of $8.0 million and $0.8 million were ~~$2.4 million during YTD 2015. There were no payments~~made to CCR under the CBAs during YTD ~~2014.~~2016 and YTD 2015, respectively.

On October 17, 2014, the Company entered into an asset exchange agreement with CCR, pursuant to which the Company exchanged its facilities and equipment located in Jackson, Tennessee for territory previously served by CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Lexington, Kentucky. This transaction closed on May 1, 2015.

As part of the Expansion Transactions, on October 30, 2015, the Company acquired from CCR a “make-ready center” in Annapolis, Maryland for approximately $5.3 million, subject to a final post-closing adjustment. The Company recorded a bargain purchase gain of $2.0 million on this transaction after applying a deferred tax liability of approximately $1.3 million. The Company uses the make-ready center to deploy and refurbish vending and other sales equipment for use in the marketplace.

Along with all other ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola bottlers in the United States, the Company is a member in ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Bottlers’ Sales and Services Company, LLC (“CCBSS”), which was formed in 2003 for the purposes of facilitating various procurement functions and distributing certain specified beverage products of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company with the intention of enhancing the efficiency and competitiveness of the ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola bottling system in the United States. CCBSS negotiates the procurement for the majority of the Company’s raw materials (excluding concentrate). The Company pays an administrative fee to CCBSS for its services. Administrative fees to CCBSS for its services were $0.5 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Amounts due from CCBSS for rebates on raw materials were ~~$6.5~~$6.4 million, ~~$4.5~~$5.9 million and ~~$6.3~~$4.9 million as of ~~September 27,~~July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016, and June 28, 2015, ~~December 28, 2014 and September 28, 2014,~~ respectively. CCR is also a member of CCBSS.

The Company is a member of SAC, a manufacturing cooperative. SAC sells finished products to the Company at cost. Purchases from SAC by the Company for finished products were ~~$107.2~~$75.7 million and ~~$101.4~~$68.7 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. In addition, the Company transports product for SAC to the Company’s and other ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola bottlers’ locations. Total sales to SAC for transporting SAC’s product were ~~$6.1~~$4.6 million and ~~$5.8~~$3.9 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. The Company also manages the operations of SAC pursuant to a management agreement. Management fees earned from SAC were ~~$1.4~~$1.1 million and ~~$1.3~~$0.9 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. The Company has also guaranteed a portion of debt for SAC. Such guarantee amounted to ~~$22.7~~$23.9 million as of ~~September 27, 2015.~~July 3, 2016. The Company’s equity investment in SAC was $4.1 million as of ~~September 27,~~July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016, and June 28, 2015, ~~December 28, 2014 and September 28, 2014~~ and was recorded in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company is a shareholder in two entities from which it purchases substantially all of its requirements for plastic bottles. Net purchases from these entities were ~~$55.3~~$42.4 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and ~~$59.9~~$37.8 million in YTD ~~2014.~~2015. In conjunction with the Company’s participation in one of these entities, Southeastern, the Company has guaranteed a portion of the entity’s debt. Such guarantee amounted to ~~$10.2~~$8.6 million as of ~~September 27, 2015.~~July 3, 2016. The Company’s equity investment in Southeastern was $18.2 million, $18.3 million ~~$18.4 million~~ and ~~$18.4~~$18.3 million as of ~~September 27,~~July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, ~~December 28, 2014, September 28, 2014,~~ respectively, and was recorded in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company holds no assets as collateral against the SAC or Southeastern guarantees, the fair value of which is immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company monitors its investments in SAC and Southeastern and would be required to write down its investment if an impairment is identified and the Company determined it to be other than temporary. No impairment of the Company’s investments in SAC or Southeastern has been identified as of ~~September 27, 2015~~July 3, 2016 nor was there any impairment in ~~2014.~~2015.

The Company leases from Harrison Limited Partnership One (“HLP”) the Snyder Production Center (“SPC”) and an adjacent sales facility, which are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. HLP is directly and indirectly owned by trusts of which J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and ~~Deborah~~Sue Anne H. ~~Everhart,~~Wells, a director of the Company, are trustees and beneficiaries. Morgan H. Everett, a director of the Company, is a permissible, discretionary beneficiary of the trusts that directly or indirectly own HLP. The SPC lease expires on December 31, 2020. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of ~~September 27,~~July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016, and June 28, 2015, was ~~$18.1 million.~~$16.1 million $17.5 million and $18.8 million, respectively. Rental payments related to this lease were ~~$2.9 million and $2.8~~$2.0 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and $1.9 million in YTD ~~2014, respectively.~~2015.

The Company leases from Beacon Investment Corporation (“Beacon”) the Company’s headquarters office facility and an adjacent office facility. The lease expires on December 31, 2021. Beacon’s majority shareholder is J. Frank Harrison, III and

Morgan H. Everett is a minority shareholder. The principal balance outstanding under this capital lease as of ~~September 27,~~July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016, and June 28, 2015, was ~~$18.8 million.~~$16.8 million, $18.1 million and $19.4 million, respectively. Rental payments related to this lease were ~~$3.2~~$2.2 million and ~~$3.1~~$2.1 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

~~Notes~~The Company is a member of CONA Services LLC (“CONA”), an entity formed with The Coca‑Cola Company and certain Coca‑Cola bottlers to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~provide business process and information technology services to its members. Under the CONA limited liability agreement executed January 27, 2016 (as amended or restated from time to time, the “CONA LLC Agreement”), the Company and other members of CONA are required to make capital contributions to CONA if and when approved by CONA’s board of directors, which is comprised of representatives of the members. The Company currently has the right to designate one of the members of CONA’s board of directors and has a percentage interest in CONA of approximately 19%. During YTD 2016, the Company made $6.6 million of capital contributions to CONA.

The Company is a party to a Master Services Agreement (the “Master Services Agreement”) with CONA, pursuant to which CONA agreed to make available, and the Company became authorized to use, the Coke One North America system (the “CONA System”), a uniform information technology system developed to promote operational efficiency and uniformity among North American Coca‑Cola bottlers. Pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, CONA agreed to make available, and authorized the Company to use, the CONA System in connection with the distribution, sale, marketing and promotion of non-alcoholic beverages the Company is authorized to distribute under its comprehensive beverage agreement or any other agreement with The Coca‑Cola Company (the “Beverages”) in the territories the Company serves (the “Territories”), subject to the provisions of the CONA LLC Agreement and any licenses or other agreements relating to products or services provided by third-parties and used in connection with the CONA System. As part of making the CONA System available to the Company, CONA will provide certain business process and information technology services to the Company, including the planning, development, management and operation of the CONA System in connection with the Company’s direct store delivery of products (collectively, the “CONA Services”). In exchange for the Company’s right to use the CONA System and right to receive the CONA Services under the Master Services Agreement, the Company will be charged service fees by CONA on a quarterly basis based on the number of physical cases of Beverages distributed by the Company during the applicable period in the Territories where the CONA Services have been implemented (the “Service Fees”). Upon the earlier of (i) all members of CONA beginning to use the CONA System in all territories in which they distribute products of The Coca‑Cola Company (excluding certain territories of CCR that are expected to be sold to bottlers that are neither members of CONA nor users of the CONA System), or (ii) December 31, 2018, the Service Fees will be changed to be an amount per physical case of Beverages distributed in any portion of the Territories that is equal to the aggregate costs incurred by CONA to maintain and operate the CONA System and provide the CONA Services divided by the total number of cases distributed by all of the members of CONA, subject to certain exceptions. The Company is obligated to pay the Service Fees under the Master Services Agreement even if it is not using the CONA System for all or any portion of its operations in the Territories. During YTD 2016, the Company incurred CONA Service Fees of $3.2 million.

The Coca‑Cola Company, the Company and three other Coca‑Cola bottlers who are regional producing bottlers in The Coca‑Cola Company’s national product supply system (collectively, the “Regional Producing Bottlers”) are parties to a national product supply governance agreement (the “NPSG Governance Agreement”), pursuant to which The Coca‑Cola Company and the Regional Producing Bottlers have established a national product supply group (the “NPSG”) and agreed to certain binding governance mechanisms, including a governing board (the “NPSG Board”) comprised of a representative of (i) the Company, (ii) The Coca‑Cola Company and (iii) each other Regional Producing Bottler. The stated objectives of the NPSG include, among others, (i) Coca‑Cola system strategic infrastructure investment and divestment planning; (ii) network optimization of all plant to distribution center sourcing; and (iii) new product/packaging infrastructure planning. The NPSG Board makes and/or oversees and directs certain key decisions regarding the NPSG, including decisions regarding the management and staffing of the NPSG and the funding for the ongoing operations thereof. The Company is obligated to pay a certain portion of the costs of operating the NPSG. Pursuant to the decisions of the NPSG Board made from time to time and subject to the terms and conditions of the NPSG Governance Agreement, the Company and each other Regional Producing Bottler will make investments in their respective manufacturing assets and will implement Coca‑Cola system strategic investment opportunities that are consistent with the NPSG Governance Agreement.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic net income per share and diluted net income per share under the two-class method:

Third Quarter

First Nine Months

In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)

2015

2014

2015

2014

Numerator for basic and diluted net income per
   Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share:

Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
   Consolidated

$
25,553

$
12,132

$
54,711

$
28,364

Less dividends:

Common Stock

1,785

1,785

5,356

5,356

Class B Common Stock

538

532

1,608

1,592

Total undistributed earnings

$
23,230

$
9,815

$
47,747

$
21,416

Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic

$
17,853

$
7,560

$
36,714

$
16,505

Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic

5,377

2,255

11,033

4,911

Total undistributed earnings – basic

$
23,230

$
9,815

$
47,747

$
21,416

Common Stock undistributed earnings – diluted

$
17,776

$
7,528

$
36,556

$
16,434

Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – diluted

5,454

2,287

11,191

4,982

Total undistributed earnings – diluted

$
23,230

$
9,815

$
47,747

$
21,416

Numerator for basic net income per Common Stock
   share:

Dividends on Common Stock

$
1,785

$
1,785

$
5,356

$
5,356

Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic

17,853

7,560

36,714

16,505

Numerator for basic net income per Common
   Stock share

$
19,638

$
9,345

$
42,070

$
21,861

Numerator for basic net income per Class B Common
   Stock share:

Dividends on Class B Common Stock

$
538

$
532

$
1,608

$
1,592

Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic

5,377

2,255

11,033

4,911

Numerator for basic net income per Class B
   Common Stock share

$
5,915

$
2,787

$
12,641

$
6,503

	Third Quarter				First Nine Months				Second Quarter				First Half
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016		2015
Numerator for basic and diluted net income per Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share:
Net income attributable to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated									$	15,652	$	26,934	$	5,611	$	29,158
Less dividends:
Common Stock										1,786		1,786		3,571		3,571
Class B Common Stock										543		538		1,081		1,070
Total undistributed earnings									$	13,323	$	24,610	$	959	$	24,517

Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic									$	10,216	$	18,913	$	736	$	18,858
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic										3,107		5,697		223		5,659
Total undistributed earnings – basic									$	13,323	$	24,610	$	959	$	24,517

Common Stock undistributed earnings – diluted									$	10,172	$	18,832	$	733	$	18,777
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – diluted										3,151		5,778		226		5,740
Total undistributed earnings – diluted									$	13,323	$	24,610	$	959	$	24,517

Numerator for basic net income per Common Stock share:
Dividends on Common Stock									$	1,786	$	1,786	$	3,571	$	3,571
Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic										10,216		18,913		736		18,858
Numerator for basic net income per Common Stock share									$	12,002	$	20,699	$	4,307	$	22,429

Numerator for basic net income per Class B Common Stock share:
Dividends on Class B Common Stock									$	543	$	538	$	1,081	$	1,070
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – basic										3,107		5,697		223		5,659
Numerator for basic net income per Class B Common Stock share									$	3,650	$	6,235	$	1,304	$	6,729

Numerator for diluted net income per Common Stock share:
Dividends on Common Stock	$	1,785	$	1,785	$	5,356	$	5,356	$	1,786	$	1,786	$	3,571	$	3,571
Dividends on Class B Common Stock assumed converted to Common Stock		538		532		1,608		1,592		543		538		1,081		1,070
Common Stock undistributed earnings – diluted		23,230		9,815		47,747		21,416		13,323		24,610		959		24,517
Numerator for diluted net income per Common Stock share	$	25,553	$	12,132	$	54,711	$	28,364	$	15,652	$	26,934	$	5,611	$	29,158

Numerator for diluted net income per Class B Common Stock share:
Dividends on Class B Common Stock	$	538	$	532	$	1,608	$	1,592	$	543	$	538	$	1,081	$	1,070
Class B Common Stock undistributed earnings – diluted		5,454		2,287		11,191		4,982		3,151		5,778		226		5,740
Numerator for diluted net income per Class B Common Stock share	$	5,992	$	2,819	$	12,799	$	6,574	$	3,694	$	6,316	$	1,307	$	6,810

Denominator for basic net income per Common Stock
   and Class B Common Stock share:

Common Stock weighted average shares
   outstanding – basic

7,141

7,141

7,141

7,141

Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
   outstanding – basic

2,151

2,130

2,146

2,125

Denominator for diluted net income per Common Stock
   and Class B Common Stock share:

Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding –
   diluted (assumes conversion of Class B Common
   Stock to Common Stock)

9,332

9,311

9,327

9,306

Class B Common Stock weighted average shares
   outstanding – diluted

2,191

2,170

2,186

2,165

Basic net income per share:

Common Stock

$
2.75

$
1.31

$
5.89

$
3.06

Class B Common Stock

$
2.75

$
1.31

$
5.89

$
3.06

Diluted net income per share:

Common Stock

$
2.74

$
1.30

$
5.87

$
3.05

Class B Common Stock

$
2.73

$
1.30

$
5.85

$
3.04

Changes in current assets and current liabilities affecting cash flows were as follows:

The Company evaluates segment reporting in accordance with the ~~Financial~~FASB Accounting Standards ~~Board (“FASB”) ASC~~Codification 280, Segment Reporting each reporting period, including evaluating the reporting package reviewed by the Chief Operation Decision Maker (“CODM”). The Company has concluded the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as a group, represent the CODM. ~~Prior to~~

The Company believes four operating segments exist. Following the sale of BYB during the ~~Company believed five operating segments existed. Two~~third quarter of fiscal 2015, two operating segments, Franchised Nonalcoholic Beverages and Internally-Developed Nonalcoholic Beverages (made up entirely of BYB), ~~have been~~ were

aggregated due to their similar economic characteristics as well as the similarity of products, production processes, types of customers, methods of distribution, and nature of the regulatory environment. This combined segment, Nonalcoholic Beverages, represents the vast majority of the Company’s consolidated revenues, operating income, and assets. ~~After the sale of BYB, the Company believes four operating segments exist.~~ The remaining three operating segments do not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate reporting, either individually or in the aggregate. As a result, these three operating segments have been combined into an “All Other” reportable segment.

The Company’s ~~segment~~ results for its two reportable segments are as follows:

	Third Quarter						First Nine Months						Second Quarter						First Half
In Thousands	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Net Sales:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	603,042		$	447,610		$	1,644,332		$	1,279,369		$	817,880		$	599,607		$	1,424,808		$	1,041,290
All Other		41,761			32,716			116,269			91,824			58,397			40,693			104,106			74,508
Eliminations*		(25,997	)		(22,650	)		(73,859	)		(65,462	)		(35,893	)		(25,617	)		(63,074	)		(47,862	)
Consolidated	$	618,806		$	457,676		$	1,686,742		$	1,305,731
Consolidated net sales													$	840,384		$	614,683		$	1,465,840		$	1,067,936

Operating Income:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	26,098		$	27,065		$	78,490		$	68,645		$	52,878		$	37,061		$	63,846		$	52,392
All Other		1,587			1,381			4,413			3,181			1,858			1,255			3,291			2,826
Consolidated	$	27,685		$	28,446		$	82,903		$	71,826
Consolidated operating income													$	54,736		$	38,316		$	67,137		$	55,218

Depreciation and Amortization:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	19,711		$	14,501		$	55,053		$	42,589		$	26,298		$	18,638		$	49,206		$	35,343
All Other		1,324			791			3,356			2,146			1,642			1,079			3,123			2,031
Consolidated	$	21,035		$	15,292		$	58,409		$	44,735
Consolidated depreciation and amortization													$	27,940		$	19,717		$	52,329		$	37,374

Capital Expenditures:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	32,886		$	18,495		$	78,364		$	44,711		$	35,832		$	26,226		$	60,826		$	45,478
All Other		13,829			5,799			23,303			12,324			7,221			2,334			13,879			9,474
Consolidated	$	46,715		$	24,294		$	101,667		$	57,035

	Sept. 27,			Dec. 28,			Sept. 28,
	2015			2014			2014
Total Assets:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	1,647,731		$	1,399,057		$	1,341,167
All Other		73,695			44,629			42,159
Eliminations		(10,579	)		(10,610	)		(6,201	)
Consolidated	$	1,710,847		$	1,433,076		$	1,377,125
Consolidated capital expenditures													$	43,053		$	28,560		$	74,705		$	54,952

*NOTE: The entire net sales elimination for each year presented ~~represent~~represents net sales from the All Other segment to the Nonalcoholic Beverages segment. Sales between these segments are either recognized at fair market value or cost depending on the nature of the transaction.

	Third Quarter				First Nine Months				Second Quarter				First Half
In Thousands	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016		2015
Bottle/can sales:
Sparkling beverages (including energy products)	$	387,955	$	286,830	$	1,082,266	$	829,622
Still beverages		120,372		81,540		302,427		217,878
Bottle/can sales*:
Sparkling beverages (carbonated)									$	464,859	$	345,871	$	816,925	$	624,393
Still beverages (noncarbonated, including energy products)										246,371		162,088		413,165		251,973
Total bottle/can sales		508,327		368,370		1,384,693		1,047,500		711,230		507,959		1,230,090		876,366

Other sales:
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers		46,618		41,291		133,024		123,680		61,045		48,560		111,255		86,406
Post-mix and other		63,861		48,015		169,025		134,551		68,109		58,164		124,495		105,164
Total other sales		110,479		89,306		302,049		258,231		129,154		106,724		235,750		191,570

Total net sales	$	618,806	$	457,676	$	1,686,742	$	1,305,731	$	840,384	$	614,683	$	1,465,840	$	1,067,936

~~Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages and~~*NOTE: In Q2 2016, energy products ~~while~~were moved from the category of sparkling beverages to still beverages, ~~are noncarbonated beverages.~~

~~In April 2014, the FASB issued new guidance~~ which ~~changes the criteria for determining which disposals~~ has been reflected in all periods presented. Total bottle/can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. The new guidance was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In September 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that requires an acquirer~~sales remain unchanged in a business combination recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early-adopt this new accounting guidance in Q3 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. The new guidance was to be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date to annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued new guidance which changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses, otherwise, the arrangement should be accounted for consistent with other service contracts. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton in Virginia and Elizabeth City in North Carolina~~

On October 30, 2015, the first closing for the additional territory expansion covered by the asset purchase agreement the Company and CCR entered into on September 23, 2015 for the Next Phase Territories occurred for Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton in Virginia and Elizabeth City in North Carolina. At the closing, the Company entered into a CBA with CCR granting the Company certain exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of products owned and licensed by The Coca-Cola Company in these expansion territories and obligating the Company to make a quarterly sub-bottling payment to CCR on a continuing basis for the grant of such rights. A description of this additional territory expansion transaction is included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2015. The transaction will be accounted for as a business combination under FASB ASC 805.

On October 30, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into a definitive asset purchase agreement for the sale by CCR to the Company of three manufacturing facilities located in Sandston, Virginia; Silver Spring, Maryland; and Baltimore, Maryland. The Company anticipates that the closings will occur separately (with the closing for the manufacturing facility located in Sandston, Virginia occurring first) and will be completed in the first half of 2016. A description of the definitive asset purchase agreement for these three manufacturing facilities is included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2015, and a copy of such agreement is filed as Exhibit 2.1 thereto. The transactions will be accounted for as business combinations under FASB ASC 805.

Concurrent with the execution of the Next Phase Definitive Agreement (Manufacturing) on October 30, 2015, the Company and The Coca-Cola Company and three other Coca-Cola bottlers who will be considered regional producing bottlers in The Coca-Cola Company’s national product supply system entered into a national product supply governance agreement pursuant to which The Coca-Cola Company and the other bottlers will form a national product supply group and will agree to certain binding governance mechanisms, including a governing board comprised of a representative of (i) the Company, (ii) The Coca-Cola Company and (iii) each of the other Coca-Cola bottlers who are members of the national product supply group.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the ~~“Company”~~“Company,” “we” and “our”) should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Bottling Partnership (“Piedmont”). The noncontrolling interest primarily consists of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company’s interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7% for all periods presented.

Since April 2013, as a part of The Coca‑Cola Company’s ~~Franchise~~plans to refranchise its North American bottling territories, the Company has engaged in a series of transactions with The Coca‑Cola Company and Coca‑Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca‑Cola Company, to expand the Company’s distribution operations significantly through the acquisition of rights to serve additional distribution territories previously served by CCR (the “Expansion Territories”) and of related distribution assets (the “Distribution Territory

Expansion Transactions”). During 2015, the Company completed its acquisitions of ~~franchise territory~~Expansion Territories announced as part of the April 2013 letter of intent signed with The ~~Coca-Cola Company. The expansion of franchise territory completed includes distribution rights~~Coca‑Cola Company which included Expansion Territories in parts of Tennessee, Kentucky and ~~Indiana previously served by Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. (“CCR”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company.~~Indiana.

~~In addition,~~As a part of these transactions, in May 2015, the Company also completed an exchange transaction where it acquired certain assets of CCR relating to the marketing, promotion, distribution and sale of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola and other beverage products in the territory previously served by CCR’s facilities and equipment located in Lexington, Kentucky (including the rights to produce such beverages in the Lexington, Kentucky territory) in exchange for certain assets of the Company relating to the marketing, promotion, distribution and sale of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola and other beverage products in the territory previously served by the Company’s facilities and equipment located in Jackson, Tennessee (including the rights to produce such beverages in the Jackson, Tennessee territory). The net assets received by the Company in the Lexington-for-Jackson exchange transaction, after deducting the value of certain retained assets and retained liabilities, was approximately ~~$10.3~~$15.3 million, which was paid in cash at ~~closing and is subject to a final post-closing adjustment.~~

~~A summary of this territory expansion completed as of September 27, 2015 (the “Completed Phase Territories”~~closing. During the quarter ended July 3, 2016 (“Q2 2016”) ~~is as follows:~~

~~The cash purchase price amounts included~~, the net assets received in the ~~table above are subject in each case to a final post-closing adjustment~~exchange, after deducting the value of certain retained assets and retained liabilities, increased by $4.2 million as a result ~~may either increase or decrease.~~

~~The financial results for~~of completing the ~~Completed Phase Territories have been included in~~post-closing adjustment under the ~~Company’s consolidated financial statements from their acquisition or~~Asset Exchange Agreement. In addition, the gain on the exchange ~~dates. These territories contributed $126.5~~was reduced by $0.7 million and $11.8 million in net sales and $1.8 million and $1.2 million in operating income in the third quarter of 2015 (“Q3 2015”) and the third quarter of 2014 (“Q3 2014”), respectively. These territories contributed $293.7 million and $16.2 million in net sales and $8.3 million and $1.5 million in operating income in the first nine months of 2015 (“YTD 2015”) and the first nine months of 2014 (“YTD 2014”), respectively.

On August 24, 2015, the Company sold BYB Brands, Inc. (“BYB”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, to The Coca-Cola Company. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement dated July 22, 2015, the Company sold all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of BYB for a cash purchase price of $26.4 million. As a result of the sale, the Company recognized a gain of $22.7 million in Q3 2015, which was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item titled “Gain on sale of business.” BYB contributed $21.8 million and $24.5 million in net sales and $1.8 million and $0.3 million in operating income in YTD 2015 and YTD 2014, respectively.

On May 12, 2015, the Company and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company entered into a second non-binding letter of intent (the “May 2015 LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would (i) grant the Company in two phases certain exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company-owned and ~~-licensed~~licensed products in additional territories ~~currently~~ served by ~~CCR.~~CCR and (ii) sell the Company certain assets that included rights to distribute those cross-licensed brands distributed in the territories by CCR as well as the assets used by CCR in the distribution of the cross-licensed brands and The Coca‑Cola Company brands. The major markets that would be served by the Company as part of the expansion contemplated by the May 2015 LOI include: Baltimore, Maryland; Alexandria, Norfolk and Richmond, ~~Washington, DC,~~Virginia; the District of Columbia; Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton, Ohio; and ~~Indianapolis.~~ Indianapolis, Indiana.

On September 23, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into an asset purchase agreement for the first phase of ~~this~~the additional ~~distribution territory~~Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions contemplated by the May 2015 LOI (the ~~“Next Phase Definitive Agreement (Distribution)”~~“September 2015 APA”) ~~expansion including:~~including Expansion Territory in: (i) eastern and northern Virginia, (ii) the entire state of Maryland, (iii) the District of Columbia, and (iv) parts of Delaware, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and West Virginia (the “Next Phase Territories”). ~~The first closing for~~During Q2 2016, the ~~series of Next Phase Territories~~Company completed the final transactions ~~covered~~contemplated by the ~~Next Phase Definitive Agreement (Distribution) (the “Next Phase Territories Transactions”) occurred on October 30,~~September 2015 APA. Following is a summary of key dates:

At each of the closings for the Next Phase Territories Transactions, ~~are expected to occur in the first half of 2016. At each closing,~~ the Company ~~will enter~~entered into a comprehensive beverage agreement with CCR in substantially the same form as the form of comprehensive beverage agreement ~~(the “Initial CBA”)~~ currently in effect in the territories acquired in the ~~Completed Phase~~earlier Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions ~~that will require~~(the “Initial CBA”) which requires the Company to make a quarterly sub-bottling payment to CCR on a continuing basis for the grant of exclusive rights to distribute, promote, market and sell the Covered Beverages and Related Products (as defined in the Initial CBA) in the applicable Next Phase Territories.

While the Company is preparing to close the remainder of the Next Phase Territory Transactions and begin the process of transitioning the business conducted by CCR in the Next Phase Territories from CCR to the Company, theThe Company is continuing to work towards a definitive agreement or agreements with The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company for the remainder of the proposed distribution territory expansion described in the May 2015 LOI, including distribution territories in central and southern Ohio, northern Kentucky and parts of Indiana and Illinois (the “Subsequent Phase Territories”).

The net cash purchase price for each of the Expansion Transactions, which include both Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions and Manufacturing Facility Expansion Transactions (as defined below), completed as of July 3, 2016 is as follows:

*NOTE: These cash purchase price amounts are subject to a final post-closing adjustment and, as a result, may either increase or decrease.

The financial results of the 2015 Expansion Territories and YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates. These territories contributed $287.1 million and $72.5 million in net sales and $16.0 million and $2.7 million in operating income during Q2 2016 and Q2 2015, respectively. These territories contributed $429.6 million and $90.5 million in net sales and $17.3 million and $4.4 million in operating income during YTD 2016 and YTD 2015, respectively.

Manufacturing Letter of Intent and Definitive Agreement for Manufacturing Facilities Serving Next Phase Territories

The May 2015 LOI contemplated, among other things, that The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company would work collaboratively with the Company and certain other expanding participating bottlers in the U.S. (“EPBs”) to implement a national product supply system. As a result of subsequent discussions among the EPBs and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company, on September 23, 2015, the Company and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent (the “Manufacturing LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would sell six manufacturing facilities (“Regional Manufacturing Facilities”) and related manufacturing assets (collectively, “Manufacturing Assets”) to the Company as the Company becomes a regional producing bottler (“Regional Producing Bottler”) in the national product supply ~~system.~~system (the “Manufacturing Facility Expansion Transactions”). Similar to, and as an integral part of, the ~~distribution territory expansion transactions~~Distribution Territory Expansion Transactions described in the May 2015 LOI, the sale of the Manufacturing Assets by CCR to the Company would be accomplished in two phases. The first phase will include three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Sandston, Virginia; Silver Spring, Maryland; and Baltimore, Maryland that serve the Next Phase Territories. The second phase will include three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Indianapolis, Indiana; Portland, Indiana; and Cincinnati, Ohio that serve the Subsequent Phase Territories. On October 30, 2015, the Company and CCR entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement (the “Next Phase Definitive Agreement (Manufacturing)”) for the Manufacturing Assets that comprise the three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Sandston, Virginia; Silver Spring, Maryland; and Baltimore, Maryland. The Company anticipates that the closing of the first acquisition of Manufacturing Assets (in Sandston, Virginia) will occur in the first quarter of 2016 and that the closings of the acquisitions of Manufacturing Assets in Silver Spring and Baltimore, Maryland will be completed in the first half of 2016.phases:

The rights for the manufacture, production and packaging of specified beverages at the Regional Manufacturing Facilities ~~will be~~acquired by the Company have been granted by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company to the Company ~~initially~~ pursuant to an initial regional manufacturing agreement ~~substantially~~ in the form ~~attached to~~disclosed in the ~~Manufacturing LOI~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2016 (the “Initial RMA”). Pursuant to its terms, the Initial RMA will be amended, restated and converted into a final form of regional manufacturing agreement (the “Final RMA”) concurrent with the conversion of the Company’s

Bottling Agreements (as defined below) to the Final CBA as described in the description of the Territory Conversion Agreement (defined and described below). Under the Final RMA, the Company’s aggregate business directly and primarily related to the manufacture of Authorized Covered Beverages, permitted cross-licensed brands and other beverages and beverage products for The Coca‑Cola Company will be subject to the same agreed upon sale process provisions included in the Final CBA as described below, which include the need to obtain The Coca‑Cola Company’s prior approval of a potential purchaser of such manufacturing business. The Coca‑Cola Company will also have the right to terminate the Final RMA in the event of an uncured default by the Company.

The Company is continuing to work towards a definitive agreement or agreements with The Coca‑Cola Company for the remainder of the proposed Manufacturing Facility Expansion Transactions described in the Manufacturing LOI, which includes three Regional Manufacturing Facilities located in Indianapolis, Indiana; Portland, Indiana; and Cincinnati, Ohio.

On October 30, 2015, the Company, The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and the other EPBs who ~~will be~~are considered Regional Producing Bottlers entered into a ~~national product supply governance agreement substantially in the form attached to the Manufacturing LOI~~National Product Supply Governance Agreement (the “NPSG Governance Agreement”). Pursuant to the NPSG Governance Agreement, The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and the Regional Producing Bottlers have formed a national product supply group (the “NPSG”) and agreed to certain binding governance mechanisms, including a governing board (the “NPSG Board”) comprised of a representative of (i) the Company, (ii) The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and (iii) each other Regional Producing Bottler. The stated objectives of the NPSG include, among others, (i) ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola system strategic infrastructure investment and divestment planning; (ii) network optimization of all plant to distribution center sourcing; and (iii) new product/packaging infrastructure planning. The NPSG Board will make and/or oversee and direct certain key decisions regarding the NPSG, including decisions regarding the management and staffing of the NPSG and the funding for the ongoing operations thereof. Pursuant to the decisions of the NPSG Board made from time to time and subject to the terms and conditions of the NPSG Governance Agreement, the Company and each other Regional Producing Bottler will make investments in their respective manufacturing assets and will implement ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola system strategic investment opportunities that are consistent with the NPSG Governance Agreement.

On February 8, 2016, the Company and The Coca‑Cola Company entered into a non-binding letter of intent (the “February 2016 LOI”) pursuant to which CCR would (i) grant the Company exclusive rights for the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and -licensed products in additional territories served by CCR in northern Ohio and northern West Virginia, (ii) sell the Company certain assets that included rights to distribute those cross-licensed brands distributed in the territories by CCR as well as the assets used by CCR in the distribution of the cross-licensed brands and The Coca‑Cola Company brands, and (iii) sell to the Company an additional Regional Manufacturing Facility currently owned by CCR located in Twinsburg, Ohio and related Manufacturing Assets. The transactions proposed in the February 2016 LOI would provide exclusive distribution rights for the Company in following major markets: Akron, Elyria, Toledo, Willoughby, and Youngstown County in Ohio.

Assets. The transactions proposed by the CCR June 2016 LOI would provide exclusive distribution rights for the Company in the following major markets: Little Rock, West Memphis and southern Arkansas; Memphis, Tennessee; and Louisa, Kentucky.

On June 14, 2016, the Company and Coca‑Cola Bottling Company United, Inc. (“United”), which is an independent bottler and unrelated to the Company, entered into a non-binding letter of intent pursuant to which the Company would exchange exclusive rights and associated distribution assets and working capital relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products and certain cross-licensed brands in certain territory in south-central Tennessee, northwest Alabama and northwest Florida currently served by the Company’s distribution centers located in Florence, Alabama and Panama City, Florida, for certain of United’s exclusive rights and associated distribution assets and working capital relating to the distribution, promotion, marketing and sale of The Coca‑Cola Company-owned and –licensed products and certain cross-licensed brands in certain territory in and around Spartanburg and Bluffton, South Carolina currently served by United’s distribution centers located in Spartanburg, South Carolina and Savannah, Georgia.

Concurrent with their execution of the ~~Next Phase Definitive Agreement (Distribution), on~~ September ~~23,~~ 2015 APA, the Company, CCR and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company executed a territory conversion agreement ~~(the~~(as amended February 8, 2016, the “Territory Conversion Agreement”), which provides that, except as noted below, all of the Company’s master bottle contracts, allied bottle contracts, Initial CBAs and other bottling agreements with The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company or CCR that authorize the Company to produce and/or distribute the Covered Beverages or Related Products (as defined therein) (collectively, the “Bottling Agreements”) would be amended, restated and converted (upon the occurrence of certain events described below) to a new and final comprehensive beverage agreement (the “Final CBA”). The conversion would include all of the Company’s then existing Bottling Agreements in the ~~Next Phase Territories or in the Completed Phase~~Expansion Territories and in all other territories in the United States where the Company has rights to market, promote, distribute and sell beverage products owned or licensed by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company (the “Legacy Territory”), but would not affect any Bottling Agreements with respect to the greater Lexington, Kentucky territory. At the time of the conversion of the Bottling Agreements for the Legacy Territory to the Final CBA, CCR will pay a fee to the Company in cash (or another mutually agreed form of payment or credit) in an amount equivalent to 0.5 times the EBITDA the Company generates from sales in the Legacy Territory of Beverages (as defined in the Final CBA) either (i) owned by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company or licensed to The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and sublicensed to the Company, or (ii) owned by or licensed to Monster Energy Company on which the Company pays, and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company receives, a facilitation fee.

The Company may elect to cause the conversion of the Bottling Agreements to the Final CBA to occur at any time by giving written notice to The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company. Further, ifnow that the transactions contemplated by the ~~Next Phase Definitive Agreement (Distribution)~~September 2015 APA ~~are~~have been consummated, ~~then~~ the conversion will occur automatically upon the earliest of (i) the consummation of all of the transactions described in the May 2015 LOI regarding the Subsequent Phase Territories (the “Subsequent Phase Territory Transactions”), (ii) January 1, 2020, as long as The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company has satisfied certain obligations described in the Territory Conversion Agreement regarding its intent to complete the Subsequent Phase Territory Transactions, or (iii) 30 days following the Company’s (a) termination of good faith negotiations of the Subsequent Phase Territory Transactions on terms similar to the Next Phase Territory Transactions or (b) notification that it no longer wants to pursue the Subsequent Phase Territory Transactions.

The Final CBA is similar to the Initial CBA in many respects, but also includes certain modifications and several new business, operational and governance provisions. For example, the Final CBA contains provisions that apply in the event of a potential sale of the Company or its aggregate businesses directly and primarily related to the marketing, promotion, distribution, and sale of Covered Beverages and Related Products (collectively, the “Business”). Under the Final CBA, the Company may only sell the Business to ~~either~~ The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company or third party buyers approved by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company. The Company annually can obtain a list of such approved third party buyers from The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company or, upon receipt of a third party offer to purchase the Business, may seek approval of such buyer by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company. In addition, the Final CBA contains a sale process that would apply if the Company notifies The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company that it wishes to sell the Business to The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company. In such event, if the Company and The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company are unable in good faith to negotiate terms and conditions of a binding purchase and sale agreement, including the purchase price for the Business, then the Company may either withdraw from negotiations with The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company or initiate a third-party valuation process described in the Final CBA to determine the purchase price for the Business and, upon such third party’s determination of the purchase price, may decide to continue with its potential sale of the Business to The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company. The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company would then have the option to (i) purchase the Business for such purchase price pursuant to defined terms and conditions set forth in the Final CBA (including, to the extent not otherwise agreed by the Company and

The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company, default non-price terms and conditions of the acquisition agreement) or (ii) elect not to purchase the Business, in which case the Final CBA would automatically be amended to, among other things, permit the Company to sell the Business to any third party without obtaining The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company’s prior approval of such third party.

The Final CBA also includes terms that would apply in the event The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company terminates the Final CBA following the Company’s default thereunder. These terms include a requirement that The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company acquire the Business upon such

termination as well as the purchase price payable to the Company in such sale. The Final CBA specifies that the purchase price would be determined in accordance with a third-party valuation process equivalent to that employed if the Company notifies The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company that it desires to sell the Business to The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company; provided, the purchase price would be 85% of the valuation of the Business determined in the third-party valuation process if the Final CBA is terminated as a result of the Company’s willful misconduct in violating certain obligations in the Final CBA with respect to dealing in other beverage products and other business activities, if a change in control occurs without the consent of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company or if the Company disposes of a majority of the voting power of any subsidiary of the Company that is a party to an agreement regarding the distribution or sale of Covered Beverages or Related Products.

Under the Final CBA, the Company will be required to ensure that it achieves an equivalent case volume per capita change rate that is not less than one standard deviation below the median of such rates for all U.S. ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola bottlers. If the Company fails to comply with the equivalent case volume per capita change rate obligation for two consecutive years, it would have a twelve-month cure period to achieve an equivalent case volume per capita change rate within such standard before it would be considered in breach under the Final CBA and the previously described termination provisions are triggered. The Final CBA also requires the Company to make minimum, ongoing capital expenditures at a specified level.

Prior to April 6, 2015, the Company distributed energy drink products packaged and/or marketed by MEC Energy Company (“MEC”) under the primary brand name “Monster” (“MEC Products”) in certain portions of the Company’s territories. On March 26, 2015, the Company and MEC entered into a new distribution agreement granting the Company rights to distribute MEC Products throughout all of the geographic territory the Company currently services for the distribution of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola products, commencing April 6, 2015.

The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily products of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and popular beverage brands in the world. The Company is the largest independent bottler of products of The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company in the United States, distributing these products in ~~thirteen~~fourteen states primarily in the Southeast. The Company also distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages. Still beverages, including energy ~~products. Still beverages~~products, are noncarbonated beverages such as bottled water, tea, ready to drink coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports drinks.

The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Company’s competitors include bottlers and distributors of nationally and regionally advertised and marketed products and private label products. In each region in which the Company operates, ~~between 85% and~~approximately 90% to 95% of sparkling beverage sales in bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its principal competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions, the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown and/or ~~7-Up~~7‑Up products. The sparkling beverage category ~~(including energy products)~~ represents approximately ~~78%~~66% of the Company’s YTD ~~2015~~2016 bottle/can net sales to retail customers.

The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are point-of-sale merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and dispensing equipment, packaging changes, pricing, price promotions, product quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of distribution and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in its territories with respect to each of these methods.

Historically, operating results for the ~~third~~second quarter of the fiscal year have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal year. Business seasonality results primarily from higher unit sales of the Company’s products in the second and third quarters versus the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are not significantly impacted by business seasonality.

	Third Quarter				First Nine Months				Second Quarter				First Half
In Thousands	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016		2015
Bottle/can sales:
Sparkling beverages (including energy products)	$	387,955	$	286,830	$	1,082,266	$	829,622
Still beverages		120,372		81,540		302,427		217,878
Bottle/can sales*:
Sparkling beverages (carbonated)									$	464,859	$	345,871	$	816,925	$	624,393
Still beverages (noncarbonated, including energy products)										246,371		162,088		413,165		251,973
Total bottle/can sales		508,327		368,370		1,384,693		1,047,500		711,230		507,959		1,230,090		876,366

Other sales:
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers		46,618		41,291		133,024		123,680		61,045		48,560		111,255		86,406
Post-mix and other		63,861		48,015		169,025		134,551		68,109		58,164		124,495		105,164
Total other sales		110,479		89,306		302,049		258,231		129,154		106,724		235,750		191,570

Total net sales	$	618,806	$	457,676	$	1,686,742	$	1,305,731	$	840,384	$	614,683	$	1,465,840	$	1,067,936

*NOTE: In Q2 2016, energy products were moved from the category of sparkling beverages to still beverages, which has been reflected in all periods presented. Total bottle/can sales remain unchanged in prior periods.

~~In addition to the expansion of the Company’s distribution territories and acquiring rights to distribute MEC Products throughout all of our territory, key~~

Key priorities for the Company include territory and manufacturing expansion, revenue management, product innovation and beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management, and productivity.

Revenue management requires a strategy ~~which~~that reflects consideration for pricing of brands and packages within product categories and channels, highly effective working relationships with customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making. Revenue management has been and continues to be a key ~~performance~~ driver which has a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations.

Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and is expected to continue to be important to the Company’s overall revenue. New products and packaging introductions over the last several years include ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Life, the ~~1.25-liter bottle,~~12-ounce sleek can, 253 ml single bottles and multi-packs, 15-pack configuration of 12 oz. cans, the 7.5-ounce sleek can ~~253 ml~~in both singles and ~~300 ml bottles~~multi-packs, Yup milk beverages and ~~the 2-liter contour bottle for Coca-Cola products.~~Core Power protein drinks.

Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from Company locations to customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to ~~$162.6~~$144.6 million and ~~$156.7~~$103.2 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Over the past several years, the Company has focused on converting its distribution system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This conversion to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently handle an increasing number of products. In addition, the Company has ~~focused on~~closed a number of smaller sales distribution centers reducing its fixed warehouse-related ~~costs by consolidating warehouse space throughout the Company’s territory.~~costs.

Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the Company.

A key driver in the Company’s selling, delivery and administrative (“S,D&A”) expense management relates to ongoing improvements in labor productivity and asset productivity.

Our results of operations for Q2 2016 and Q2 2015 ~~Compared to Q3 2014.~~are highlighted in the table below and discussed in the following paragraphs:

~~The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Company’s financial results for Q3 2015 compared to Q3 2014.~~

	Third Quarter											Second Quarter
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	2015			2014		Change			% Change			2016			2015		Change			% Change
Net sales	$	618,806		$	457,676	$	161,130			35.2		$	840,384		$	614,683	$	225,701		36.7%
Cost of sales		380,270			272,734		107,536			39.4			520,677			377,366		143,311			38.0
Gross margin		238,536			184,942		53,594			29.0			319,707			237,317		82,390			34.7
S,D&A expenses		210,851			156,496		54,355			34.7			264,971			199,001		65,970			33.2
Income from operations		27,685			28,446		(761	)		(2.7	)		54,736			38,316		16,420			42.9
Interest expense, net		6,686			7,333		(647	)		(8.8	)		9,808			6,718		3,090			46.0
Other income (expense)		(3,992	)		0		(3,992	)	N/M
Gain on sale of business		22,651			0		22,651		N/M
Other income (expense), net													(16,274	)		6,078		(22,352	)		(367.8	)
Gain (loss) on exchange of franchise territory													(692	)		8,807		(9,499	)		(107.9	)
Income before taxes		39,658			21,113		18,545			87.8			27,962			46,483		(18,521	)		(39.8	)
Income tax expense		12,099			7,408		4,691			63.3			10,638			17,562		(6,924	)		(39.4	)
Net income		27,559			13,705		13,854			101.1			17,324			28,921		(11,597	)		(40.1	)

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest													1,672			1,987		(315	)		(15.9	)
Net income attributable to the Company		25,553			12,132		13,421			110.6		$	15,652		$	26,934	$	(11,282	)	(41.9)%

Basic net income per share:
Common Stock	$	2.75		$	1.31	$	1.44			109.9
Class B Common Stock	$	2.75		$	1.31	$	1.44			109.9
Diluted net income per share:
Common Stock	$	2.74		$	1.30	$	1.44			110.8
Class B Common Stock	$	2.73		$	1.30	$	1.43			110.0

The following items affect the comparability of the Q3Q2 2016 and Q2 2015 ~~and Q3 2014~~ financial results:

Net sales increased ~~$161.1~~$225.7 million, or ~~35.2%~~36.7%, to ~~$618.8~~$840.4 million in ~~Q3 2015~~Q2 2016 compared to ~~$457.7~~$614.7 million in ~~Q3 2014.~~ Q2 2015.

The increase in net sales ~~for Q3 2015 compared to Q3 2014~~ was principally attributable to the ~~following:~~following (in millions):

In ~~Q3 2015,~~Q2 2016, the Company’s bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for approximately ~~82%~~85% of the Company’s total net sales. Bottle/can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to customers reduced by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the price charged per package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those packages are sold.

Product category sales volume in Q3Q2 2016 and Q2 2015 ~~and Q3 2014~~ as a percentage of total bottle/can sales volume ~~to retail customers~~ and the percentage change by product category ~~was~~were as follows:

Bottle/can volume to retail customers (excluding ~~Completed Phase~~2016 and 2015 Expansion Territories) increased ~~6.8%~~4.5%, which represented a ~~3.4%~~2.1% increase in sparkling beverages and ~~a 18.5%~~an 10.6% increase in still beverages in ~~Q3 2015~~Q2 2016 compared to ~~Q3 2014.~~Q2 2015. The increase in ~~sparkling~~still beverages was primarily due to increases in energy beverages, which was primarily due to the Company’s expanding its territories where the Company distributes MEC Products. The growth trajectory and driving factors of sparkling and still beverages are different. Sparkling beverages ~~(other than energy beverages)~~ are in a mature state and have a lower growth trajectory, while still beverages, ~~and~~including energy beverages, have a higher growth trajectory primarily driven by changing customer preferences.

Cost of sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs, shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers and purchase of finished goods.

Cost of sales increased ~~39.4%~~$143.3 million, or 38.0%, ~~or $107.5 million,~~ to ~~$380.3~~$520.7 million in ~~Q3 2015~~Q2 2016 compared to ~~$272.7~~$377.4 million in ~~Q3 2014.~~ Q2 2015.

The increase in cost of sales ~~for Q3 2015 compared to Q3 2014~~ was principally attributable to the ~~following:~~following (in millions):

~~Sweeteners, packaging materials (including plastic bottles and aluminum cans), and finished products purchased from other vendors~~The following inputs represent a substantial portion of the Company’s total cost of ~~sales.~~

The Company purchases concentrate from The Coca-Cola Company under an incidence-based pricing arrangement. Under the incidence-based pricing model, the concentrate price The Coca-Cola Company charges is impacted by a number of factors,goods sold: (i) sweeteners, (ii) packaging materials, including ~~the incidence rate in effect, the Company’s pricing~~plastic bottles and ~~sales of~~aluminum cans, and (iii) finished products ~~the channels in which the finished products are sold, and package mix.~~purchased from other vendors.

The Company relies extensively on advertising and sales promotion in the marketing of its products. The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and other beverage companies that supply concentrates, syrups and finished products to the Company make substantial marketing and advertising expenditures to promote sales in the local territories served by the Company. The Company also benefits from national advertising programs conducted by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and other beverage companies. Certain of the marketing expenditures by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and other beverage companies are made pursuant to annual arrangements. Although The Coca-Cola Company has advised the Company that it intends to continue to provide marketing funding support, it is not obligated to do so under the Company’s Beverage Agreements. Significant decreases in marketing funding support from The Coca-Cola Company or other beverage companies could adversely impact operating results of the Company in the future.

~~Gross margin dollars increased 29.0%, or $53.6 million, to $238.5~~$18.4 million in Q3 2015 compared to $184.9 million in Q3 2014. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales decreased to 38.5% for Q3 2015 from 40.4% for Q3 2014. The increase in gross margin dollars for Q3 2015 compared to Q3 2014 was principally attributable to the following:Q2 2015.

The Company’s gross margins may not be comparable to other peer companies, since some of them include all costs related to their distribution network in cost of sales and the Company does not. The Company includes a portion of these costs in S,D&A expenses.

S,D&A expenses include the following: sales management labor costs, distribution costs from sales distribution centers to customer locations, sales distribution center warehouse costs, depreciation expense related to sales centers, delivery vehicles and cold drink equipment, point-of-sale expenses, advertising expenses, cold drink equipment repair costs, amortization of intangibles and administrative support labor and operating ~~costs such as treasury, legal, information services, accounting, internal control services, human resources and executive management~~ costs.

S,D&A expenses increased by ~~$54.4~~$66.0 million, or ~~34.7%~~33.2%, to ~~$210.9~~$265.0 million in ~~Q3 2015~~Q2 2016 from ~~$156.5~~$199.0 million in ~~Q3 2014.~~Q2 2015. S,D&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to ~~34.1%~~31.5% in ~~Q3 2015~~Q2 2016 from ~~34.2%~~32.4% in ~~Q3 2014.~~ Q2 2015.

The increase in S,D&A expenses ~~for Q3 2015 compared to Q3 2014~~ was principally attributable to the ~~following:~~following (in millions):

Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are included in S,D&A expenses and totaled $80.3 million and $45.9 million in Q2 2016 and Q2 2015, respectively.

Net interest expense ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$0.6~~$3.1 million or ~~8.8%~~46.0% in ~~Q3 2015~~Q2 2016 compared to ~~Q3 2014.~~Q2 2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in ~~Q3 2015,~~Q2 2016, as compared to ~~Q3 2014,~~Q2 2015, was primarily due to ~~the refinancing in April 2015 of $100 million in senior notes with borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility which has a lower interest rate. This decrease was partially offset by~~ additional borrowings to finance the territory expansion. ~~The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 4.3% and 5.7% during Q3 2015 and Q3 2014, respectively.~~

Other ~~(expense)~~ income ~~in Q3 2015~~(expense) included a noncash expense of ~~$4.0~~$16.3 million in Q2 2016 and a noncash benefit of $6.1 million in Q2 2015 as a result of ~~an unfavorable~~ fair value ~~adjustment~~adjustments of the Company’s contingent consideration liability related to the ~~expansion territories acquired during 2014 and 2015.~~Expansion Territories. The adjustment in Q2 2016 was primarily ~~driven by~~due to a change in the risk-free interest ~~rate during Q3 2015.~~rates. As the contingent consideration is calculated using 40 years of discounted cash flows, any reductions in contingent consideration due to current payments of the liability are effectively marked to market at the next reporting period, assuming interest rates and future projections remain constant.

Each reporting period, the Company adjusts its contingent consideration liability related to the newly-acquired distribution territories to fair value. The fair value is determined by discounting future expected sub-bottling payments required under the CBAs using the Company’s estimated weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), which is impacted by many factors, including the risk-free interest rate. These future expected sub-bottling payments extend through the life of the related distribution asset acquired in each distribution territory expansion, which is generally 40 years. In addition, the Company is required to pay quarterly the current portion of the sub-bottling fee. As a result, the fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration liability is impacted by the Company’s estimated WACC, management’s best estimate of the amounts of sub-bottling payments that will be paid in the future under the CBAs, and current period sub-bottling payments made. Changes in any of these factors, particularly the underlying risk-free interest rate used to estimate the Company’s WACC, could materially impact the fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration and consequently the amount of noncash expense (or income) recorded each reporting period.

The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, for Q3Q2 2016 and Q2 2015 was 38.0% and ~~Q3 2014 was 30.5% and 35.1%~~37.8%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was driven primarily by a decrease to the favorable manufacturing deduction (as a percentage of pre-tax income) caused by new Expansion Territories which do not qualify for the deduction. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes minus net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, for Q3Q2 2016 and Q2 2015 was 40.5% and ~~Q3 2014 was 32.1% and 37.9%~~39.5%, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to the reduction in the valuation allowance related to the sale of BYB and a reduction to income tax associated with state legislation that reduced the corporate tax rate.

The Company’s income tax assets and liabilities are subject to adjustment in future periods based on the Company’s ongoing evaluations of such assets and liabilities and new information that becomes available to the Company.

The Company recorded net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of $1.7 million and $2.0 million in Q2 2016 and ~~$1.6 million in Q3~~Q2 2015, ~~and Q3 2014~~ respectively, related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company.

~~Other comprehensive income, net of tax, was $0.4 million in both Q3 2015 and Q3 2014.~~

Our results of operations for YTD 2016 and YTD 2015 ~~compared to YTD 2014.~~are highlighted in the table below and discussed in the following paragraphs:

~~The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Company’s financial results for YTD 2015 compared to YTD 2014.~~

	First Nine Months								%			First Half								%
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	2015			2014		Change			Change			2016			2015		Change			Change
Net sales	$	1,686,742		$	1,305,731	$	381,011			29.2		$	1,465,840		$	1,067,936	$	397,904		37.3%
Cost of sales		1,026,516			778,936		247,580			31.8			902,235			646,246		255,989			39.6
Gross margin		660,226			526,795		133,431			25.3			563,605			421,690		141,915			33.7
S,D&A expenses		577,323			454,969		122,354			26.9			496,468			366,472		129,996			35.5
Income from operations		82,903			71,826		11,077			15.4			67,137			55,218		11,919			21.6
Interest expense, net		20,751			21,899		(1,148	)		(5.2	)		19,169			14,065		5,104			36.3
Other income (expense)		(3,003	)		0		(3,003	)	N/M
Gain on exchange of franchise territory		8,807			0		8,807		N/M
Gain on sale of business		22,651			0		22,651		N/M
Other income (expense), net													(33,425	)		989		(34,414	)		(3,479.7	)
Gain (loss) on exchange of franchise territory													(692	)		8,807		(9,499	)		(107.9	)
Income before taxes		90,607			49,927		40,680			81.5			13,851			50,949		(37,098	)		(72.8	)
Income tax expense		31,174			17,789		13,385			75.2			5,560			19,075		(13,515	)		(70.9	)
Net income		59,433			32,138		27,295			84.9			8,291			31,874		(23,583	)		(74.0	)

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest													2,680			2,716		(36	)		(1.3	)
Net income attributable to the Company		54,711			28,364		26,347			92.9		$	5,611		$	29,158	$	(23,547	)	(80.8)%

Basic net income per share:
Common Stock	$	5.89		$	3.06	$	2.83			92.5
Class B Common Stock	$	5.89		$	3.06	$	2.83			92.5
Diluted net income per share:
Common Stock	$	5.87		$	3.05	$	2.82			92.5
Class B Common Stock	$	5.85		$	3.04	$	2.81			92.4

The following items affect the comparability of the YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014~~2015 financial results:

Net sales increased ~~$381.0~~$397.9 million, or ~~29.2%~~37.3%, to ~~$1.69~~$1.47 billion in YTD ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~$1.31~~$1.07 billion in YTD ~~2014.~~ 2015.

The increase in net sales ~~for YTD 2015 compared to YTD 2014~~ was principally attributable to the ~~following:~~following (in millions):

In YTD ~~2015,~~2016, the Company’s bottle/can sales to retail customers accounted for approximately ~~82%~~84% of the Company’s total net sales. Bottle/can net pricing is based on the invoice price charged to customers reduced by promotional allowances. Bottle/can net pricing per unit is impacted by the price charged per package, the volume generated in each package and the channels in which those packages are sold.

Product category sales volume in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014~~2015 as a percentage of total bottle/can sales volume ~~to retail customers~~ and the percentage change by product category ~~was~~were as follows:

Bottle/can volume ~~for~~to retail customers (excluding ~~Completed Phase~~2016 and 2015 Expansion Territories) increased ~~4.2%~~5.8%, which represented a ~~1.9%~~2.0% increase in sparkling beverages and a ~~12.5%~~16.7% increase in still beverages in YTD ~~2015~~2016 compared to YTD ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~volume~~ increase in ~~sparkling~~still beverages was primarily due to increases in energy beverages, which was primarily due to the Company’s expanding its territories where the Company distributes MEC Products. The growth trajectory and driving factors of sparkling and still beverages are different. Sparkling beverages (other than energy beverages) are in a mature state and have a lower growth trajectory, while still beverages and energy beverages have a higher growth trajectory primarily driven by changing customer preferences.

The Company’s products are sold and distributed through various channels. They include selling directly to retail stores and other outlets such as food markets, institutional accounts and vending machine outlets. During YTD ~~2015 and YTD 2014,~~2016, approximately 67% ~~and 68%~~ of the Company’s bottle/can volume ~~to retail customers~~ was sold for future consumption, while the remaining bottle/can volume ~~to retail customers~~ of approximately 33% ~~and 32%, respectively,~~ was sold for immediate consumption. The Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted for approximately 22% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume to retail customers during both YTD 2015 and YTD 2014. The Company’s second largest customer, Food Lion, LLC, accounted for approximately 7% and 9% of the Company’s total bottle/can volume to retail customers during YTD 2015 and YTD 2014, respectively. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. accounted for approximately 15% of the Company’s net sales during both YTD 2015 and YTD 2014. No other customer represented greater than 10% of the Company’s total net sales in YTD 2015 or YTD 2014. All of the Company’s beverage sales are to customers in the United States. Following is a summary of volume and sales to the Company’s largest customers:

Cost of ~~Sales~~sales includes the following: raw material costs, manufacturing labor, manufacturing overhead including depreciation expense, manufacturing warehousing costs, shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers and purchase of finished goods.

Cost of sales increased ~~$247.6~~39.6%, or $256.0 million, ~~or 31.8%,~~ to ~~$1.03 billion in YTD 2015 compared to $778.9~~$902.2 million in YTD ~~2014.~~ 2016 compared to $646.2 million in YTD 2015.

The increase in cost of sales ~~for YTD 2015 compared to YTD 2014~~ was principally attributable to the ~~following:~~following (in million):

Total marketing funding support from The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company and other beverage companies, which includes direct payments to the Company and payments to customers for marketing programs, was ~~$52.8~~$46.3 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~$41.4~~$32.4 million in YTD 2014. The increase was attributable both to additional marketing funding support received from The Coca-Cola Company to promote sales of still beverage products throughout the territories served by the Company and increased marketing funding support to promote sales in the Expansion Territories the Company acquired in 2015. The Company expects marketing funding support generally to increase as the Company acquires additional Expansion Territories, but future levels of marketing funding support and promotion funds provided by The Coca-Cola Company and other beverage companies may, and likely will, vary materially from the levels provided during the Company’s most recently completed and current fiscal year.

Gross margin dollars increased 25.3%, or $133.4 million, to $660.2 million in YTD 2015 compared to $526.8 million in YTD 2014. Gross margin as a percentage of net sales decreased to 39.1% for YTD 2015 from 40.3% in YTD 2014. The increase in gross margin dollars for YTD 2015 compared to YTD 2014 was principally attributable to the following:

S,D&A expenses increased by ~~$122.4~~$130.0 million, or ~~26.9%~~35.5%, to ~~$577.3~~$496.5 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 from ~~$454.9~~$366.5 million in YTD ~~2014.~~2015. S,D&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to ~~34.2%~~33.9% in YTD ~~2015~~2016 from ~~34.8%~~34.3% in YTD ~~2014.~~ 2015.

The increase in S,D&A expenses ~~for YTD 2015 compared to YTD 2014~~ was principally attributable to the ~~following:~~following (in millions):

Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from manufacturing locations to sales distribution centers are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling costs related to the movement of finished goods from sales distribution centers to customer locations are included in S,D&A expenses and totaled ~~$162.6~~$144.6 million and ~~$156.7~~$103.2 million in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

Net interest expense ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$1.1~~$5.1 million or ~~5.2%~~36.3% in YTD ~~2015~~2016 compared to YTD ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in YTD ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to YTD ~~2014,~~2015, was primarily due to ~~the refinancing in April 2015 of $100 million in senior notes with borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility which has a lower interest rate, partially offset by~~ additional borrowings to finance the territory expansion. ~~The Company’s overall weighted average interest rate on its debt and capital lease obligations was 4.6% and 5.8% during YTD 2015 and YTD 2014.~~

Other income (expense) ~~in YTD 2015~~ included a noncash expense of ~~$3.0~~$33.4 million in YTD 2016 and a noncash benefit of $1.0 million in YTD 2015 as a result of ~~an unfavorable~~ fair value ~~adjustment~~adjustments of the Company’s contingent consideration liability related to the ~~expansion territories acquired during 2014 and 2015, which~~Expansion Territories. The adjustment was primarily ~~driven by~~due to updated projections and a change in the risk-free interest ~~rate.~~rates. As the contingent consideration is calculated using 40 years of discounted cash flows, any reductions in contingent consideration due to current payments of the liability are effectively marked to market at the next reporting period, assuming interest rates and future projections remain constant.

The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes, for YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014~~2015 was ~~34.4%~~40.1% and ~~35.6%~~37.4%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was driven primarily by an increase in the state tax rate applied to the deferred tax assets and liabilities driven by the new territories, a decrease to the favorable manufacturing deduction (as a percentage of pre-tax income) caused by new territories which do not qualify for the deduction, and lower pre-tax book income. The Company’s effective tax rate, as calculated by dividing income tax expense by income before income taxes minus net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, for YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014~~2015 was ~~36.3%~~49.8% and ~~38.5%~~39.5%, respectively.

During Q1 2016, the Company revalued its existing net deferred tax liabilities for the effects which resulted from the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions. The ~~decrease is primarily due~~YTD 2016 impact was an increase to the ~~reduction in the valuation allowance related to the sale~~recorded income tax expense of ~~BYB and a reduction to deferred income taxes associated with state legislation that reduced the corporate rate.~~$0.8 million.

The Company recorded net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of ~~$4.7 million and $3.8~~$2.7 million in both YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014 respectively,~~2015, related to the portion of Piedmont owned by The ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Company.

The Company reports its financial results in accordance with GAAP. However, management believes certain non-GAAP financial measures provide users with additional meaningful financial information that should be considered when assessing the Company’s ongoing performance. Management also uses these non-GAAP financial measures in making financial, operating and planning decisions and in evaluating the Company's performance. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, the Company's reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company’s non-GAAP financial information does not represent a comprehensive ~~income, net~~basis of ~~tax, was $1.3 million~~accounting.

The following table reconciles reported GAAP results to comparable results for Q2 2016 and ~~$1.1 million in YTD~~Q2 2015, and for YTD ~~2014, respectively.~~2016 and YTD 2015:

	Second Quarter 2016
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	Net sales			Income from operations			Income before income taxes			Net income			Basic net income per share
Reported results (GAAP)	$	840,384		$	54,736		$	27,962		$	15,652		$	1.68
Fair value adjustments for commodity hedges		-			(2,770	)		(2,770	)		(1,701	)		(0.18	)
2016 & 2015 acquisitions impact		(287,092	)		(15,974	)		(15,974	)		(9,808	)		(1.05	)
Territory expansion expenses		-			7,005			7,005			4,301			0.46
Exchange of franchise territories		-			-			692			425			0.05
Fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration		-			-			16,274			9,992			1.07
Total reconciling items		(287,092	)		(11,739	)		5,227			3,209			0.35
Comparable results (non-GAAP)	$	553,292		$	42,997		$	33,189		$	18,861		$	2.03

	Second Quarter 2015
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	Net sales			Income from operations			Income before income taxes			Net income			Basic net income per share
Reported results (GAAP)	$	614,683		$	38,316		$	46,483		$	26,934		$	2.90
Fair value adjustments for commodity hedges		-			749			749			460			0.05
2015 acquisitions impact		(72,457	)		(2,672	)		(2,672	)		(1,641	)		(0.18	)
2015 divestitures impact		(12,775	)		(2,395	)		(2,395	)		(1,471	)		(0.16	)
Territory expansion expenses		-			4,252			4,252			2,611			0.28
Exchange of franchise territories		-			-			(8,807	)		(5,407	)		(0.58	)
Fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration		-			-			(6,078	)		(3,732	)		(0.40	)
Total reconciling items		(85,232	)		(66	)		(14,951	)		(9,180	)		(0.99	)
Comparable results (non-GAAP)	$	529,451		$	38,250		$	31,532		$	17,754		$	1.91

	First Half 2016
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	Net sales			Income from operations			Income before income taxes			Net income			Basic net income per share
Reported results (GAAP)	$	1,465,840		$	67,137		$	13,851		$	5,611		$	0.60
Fair value adjustments for commodity hedges		-			(3,810	)		(3,810	)		(2,339	)		(0.25	)
2016 & 2015 acquisitions impact		(429,561	)		(17,260	)		(17,260	)		(10,598	)		(1.14	)
Territory expansion expenses		-			13,427			13,427			8,244			0.89
Special charitable contribution		-			4,000			4,000			2,456			0.26
Exchange of franchise territories		-			-			692			425			0.05
Fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration		-			-			33,425			20,523			2.21
Total reconciling items		(429,561	)		(3,643	)		30,474			18,711			2.02
Comparable results (non-GAAP)	$	1,036,279		$	63,494		$	44,325		$	24,322		$	2.62

	First Half 2015
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)	Net sales			Income from operations			Income before income taxes			Net income			Basic net income per share
Reported results (GAAP)	$	1,067,936		$	55,218		$	50,949		$	29,158		$	3.14
Fair value adjustments for commodity hedges		-			106			106			65			0.01
2015 acquisitions impact		(90,506	)		(4,436	)		(4,436	)		(2,724	)		(0.29	)
2015 divestitures impact		(26,348	)		(3,529	)		(3,529	)		(2,167	)		(0.23	)
Territory expansion expenses		-			7,247			7,247			4,450			0.48
Exchange of franchise territories		-			-			(8,807	)		(5,407	)		(0.58	)
Fair value adjustment of acquisition related contingent consideration		-			-			(989	)		(608	)		(0.07	)
Total reconciling items		(116,854	)		(612	)		(10,408	)		(6,391	)		(0.68	)
Comparable results (non-GAAP)	$	951,082		$	54,606		$	40,541		$	22,767		$	2.46

~~Prior to~~The Company evaluates segment reporting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification 280, Segment Reporting each reporting period, including evaluating the reporting package reviewed by the Chief Operation Decision Maker (“CODM”). The Company has concluded the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as a group, represent the CODM.

The Company believes four operating segments exist. Following the sale of BYB during the ~~Company operated its business under five operating segments. Two~~third quarter of fiscal 2015, two operating segments, Franchised Nonalcoholic Beverages and Internally-Developed Nonalcoholic Beverages (made up entirely of BYB), ~~have been~~were aggregated due to their similar economic characteristics as well as the similarity of products, production processes, types of customers, methods of distribution, and nature of the regulatory environment. This combined segment, Nonalcoholic Beverages, represents the vast majority of the Company’s consolidated revenues, operating income, and assets. ~~After the sale of BYB, the Company believes four operating segments exist.~~ The remaining three operating segments do not meet the quantitative thresholds ~~in ASC 280~~ for separate ~~reporting.~~reporting, either individually or in the aggregate. As a result, ~~the discussion of the Company’s operations is focused on the consolidated results. Below is a breakdown of the Company’s net sales and~~these three operating ~~income by~~segments have been combined into an “All Other” reportable segment.

	Third Quarter						First Nine Months						Second Quarter						First Half
In Thousands	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Net Sales:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	603,042		$	447,610		$	1,644,332		$	1,279,369		$	817,880		$	599,607		$	1,424,808		$	1,041,290
All Other		41,761			32,716			116,269			91,824			58,397			40,693			104,106			74,508
Eliminations		(25,997	)		(22,650	)		(73,859	)		(65,462	)
Consolidated	$	618,806		$	457,676		$	1,686,742		$	1,305,731
Eliminations*														(35,893	)		(25,617	)		(63,074	)		(47,862	)
Consolidated net sales													$	840,384		$	614,683		$	1,465,840		$	1,067,936

Operating Income:
Nonalcoholic Beverages	$	26,098		$	27,065		$	78,490		$	68,645		$	52,878		$	37,061		$	63,846		$	52,392
All Other		1,587			1,381			4,413			3,181			1,858			1,255			3,291			2,826
Consolidated	$	27,685		$	28,446		$	82,903		$	71,826
Consolidated operating income													$	54,736		$	38,316		$	67,137		$	55,218

*NOTE: The entire net sales elimination for each year presented represents net sales from the All Other segment to the Nonalcoholic Beverages segment. Sales between these segments are either recognized at fair market value or cost depending on the nature of the transaction.

Total assets increased to $2.25 billion at July 3, 2016, from $1.85 billion at January 3, 2016 and $1.71 billion at ~~September 27,~~June 28, 2015. The increase in total assets is primarily attributable to the acquisition of the YTD 2016 Expansion Territories and 2015 Expansion Territories, contributing to an increase in total assets of $250.1 million from ~~$1.43 billion at December~~January 3, 2016 and $348.5 million from June 28, ~~2014 and $1.38 billion at September 28, 2014 primarily due to assets acquired in~~2015. In addition, the ~~Completed Phase Territories.~~ Company had capital expenditures of $79.6 million during YTD 2016.

Net working capital, ~~(deficit),~~ defined as current assets less current liabilities, ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$120.5~~$49.3 million to ~~$(60.9)~~$157.7 million at ~~September 27, 2015~~July 3, 2016 from ~~December 28, 2014~~January 3, 2016 and ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$146.9~~$31.6 million at ~~September 27, 2015~~July 3, 2016 from ~~September~~June 28, ~~2014.~~2015.

~~Significant changes in net working capital (deficit) from December 28, 2014 were as follows:~~

Significant changes in net working capital from ~~September 28, 2014~~January 3, 2016 were as follows:

Debt and capital lease obligations were $606.4 million as of September 27, 2015 compared to $503.8 million as of December 28, 2014 and $504.3 million as of September 28, 2014. Debt and capital lease obligations as of September 27, 2015 included $57.5 million of capital lease obligations related primarily to Company facilities.

The Company’s sources of capital include cash flows from operations, available credit ~~facility balances, banks~~facilities and the issuance of debt and equity securities. The Company has obtained the majority of its long-term debt, other than capital leases, from the public markets. Management believes the Company has sufficient sources of capital available to refinance its maturing debt, finance its business plan, including the proposed acquisition of previously announced additional ~~distribution territories pursuant to the May 2015 LOI~~Expansion Territories and ~~the acquisition of additional manufacturing facilities pursuant to the~~Regional Manufacturing ~~LOI,~~Facilities, meet its working capital requirements and maintain an appropriate level of capital spending for at least the next 12 months. The amount and frequency of future dividends will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in light of the earnings and financial condition of the Company at such time, and no assurance can be given that dividends will be declared or paid in the future.

In October ~~16,~~ 2014, the Company entered into a $350 million five-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) ~~which amended and restated~~. In April 2015, the ~~Company’s existing $200~~Company exercised the accordion feature of the Revolving Credit Facility thereby increasing the aggregate availability by $100 million ~~five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement.~~to $450 million. The Revolving Credit Facility has a scheduled maturity date of October 16, 2019 and up to $50 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. ~~On April 27, 2015, the Company exercised the accordion feature of the Revolving Credit Facility thereby increasing the aggregate availability by $100 million to $450 million.~~ Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a floating base rate or a floating Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin, dependent on the Company’s credit rating at the time of borrowing. At the Company’s current credit ratings, the Company must pay an annual facility fee of ~~.15%~~0.15% of the lenders’ aggregate ~~commitments.~~commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility includes two financial covenants: a cash flow/fixed charges ratio ~~(“fixed charges coverage ratio”)~~ and a funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio, ~~(“operating cash flow ratio”),~~ each as defined in the ~~credit~~ agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of ~~September 27, 2015.~~July 3, 2016. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources.

The Company currently believes ~~that~~ all ~~of the~~ banks participating in the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility have the ability to and will meet any funding requests from the Company. On ~~September 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014,~~July 3, 2016, the Company had ~~$275.0~~$75.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility and ~~$71.0~~had $375.0 million ~~respectively,~~available to meet its cash requirements. On January 3, 2016, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility. On June 28, 2015, the Company had $290.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility.

In November 2015, the Company issued $350 million of unsecured 3.8% Senior Notes due 2025. The notes were issued at 99.975% of par, which resulted in a discount on the notes of approximately $0.1 million. Total debt issuance costs for these notes totaled $3.2 million. The proceeds plus cash on hand were used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. ~~On September 28, 2014, the Company had $50.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Company’s prior revolving credit facility.~~

The Company ~~had~~refinanced its $100 million of ~~senior notes~~Senior Notes, which matured in April ~~2015.~~2015, with borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility.

flow/fixed charges ratio and a consolidated funded indebtedness/cash flow ratio, each as defined in the agreement. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of July 3, 2016. These covenants do not currently, and the Company does not anticipate they will, restrict its liquidity or capital resources. The Company used $210 million of the proceeds from the Term Loan Facility to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company then used the remaining proceeds, as well as borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, to ~~refinance~~repay the ~~notes. The Company has~~ $164.8 million of ~~senior notes maturing in~~Senior Notes that matured on June ~~2016, which the Company intends to refinance.~~

On October 31, 2014, the Company terminated an uncommitted line of credit under which the Company could borrow up to a total of $20 million for periods of 7 days, 30 days, 60 days or 90 days at the discretion of the participating bank and refinanced the outstanding balance with additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. On September 28, 2014, the Company had $20.0 million outstanding under the uncommitted line of credit.15, 2016.

~~The Company historically has obtained the majority of its financing, other than capital leases, from various sources, including banks and the public markets.~~ As of ~~September 27, 2015, $273.9 million of~~July 3, 2016, the Company’s total outstanding balance of debt and capital lease obligations was $882.1 million, of ~~$606.4~~which $455.7 million was financed through publicly offered debt. The Company had capital lease obligations of ~~$57.5~~$52.3 million as of ~~September 27, 2015.~~

July 3, 2016. As of ~~September 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and September 28, 2014,~~January 3, 2016, the ~~weighted average interest rate~~Company’s total outstanding balance of ~~the Company’s~~ debt and capital lease obligations was ~~4.4%, 5.8% and 5.8%, respectively, for its outstanding debt and~~$675.4 million, of which $619.6 million was financed through publicly offered debt. The Company had capital lease ~~obligations. The~~obligations of $55.8 million as of January 3, 2016. As of June 28, 2015, the Company’s ~~overall weighted average interest rate on its~~total outstanding balance of debt and capital lease obligations was ~~4.6% and 5.8% in YTD 2015 and YTD 2014 respectively. As of September 27, 2015, $275.0~~$621.3 million, of ~~the Company’s debt and~~which $272.1 million was financed through publicly offered debt. The Company had capital lease obligations of ~~$606.4~~$59.2 million ~~were subject to changes in short-term interest rates.~~as of June 28, 2016.

All of the outstanding long-term debt on the Company’s balance sheet has been issued by the Company with none having been issued by any of the Company’s subsidiaries. There are no guarantees of the Company’s debt.

At ~~September 27, 2015,~~July 3, 2016, the Company’s credit ratings were as follows:

The Company’s credit ratings, which the Company is disclosing to enhance understanding of the Company’s sources of liquidity and the effect of the Company’s rating on the Company’s cost of funds, are reviewed periodically by the respective rating agencies. Changes in the Company’s operating results or financial position could result in changes in the Company’s credit ratings. Lower credit ratings could result in higher borrowing costs for the Company or reduced access to capital markets, which could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. There were no changes in these credit ratings from the prior year and the credit ratings are currently stable. ~~Changes in the credit ratings of The Coca-Cola Company could adversely affect the Company’s credit ratings as well.~~

The indentures under which the Company’s public debt was issued do not include financial covenants but do limit the incurrence of certain liens and encumbrances as well as indebtedness by the Company’s subsidiaries in excess of certain amounts.

As a result of new guidance on accounting for debt issuance costs, $4.4 million, $4.3 million and $1.7 million of debt issuance costs as of July 3, 2016, January 3, 2016 and June 28, 2015, respectively, were classified as a reduction to long-term debt.

The Company’s only Level 3 asset or liability is the contingent consideration liability incurred as a result of the territory expansion transactions completed in 2015 and 2014. The September 27, 2015 balance of $93.1 million included a $4.0 million and a $3.0 million noncash fair value adjustment to increase the liability in Q3 2015 and YTD 2015, respectively.Expansion Transactions. There were no transfers from Level 1 or Level 2. ~~The noncash fair~~Fair value adjustments ~~in Q3 2015 and YTD 2015, respectively,~~were non-cash, therefore did not impact the Company’s liquidity or capital resources. Following is a summary of the Level 3 activity:

The primary sources of cash for the Company in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014~~2015 were borrowings under credit facilities and cash flows from operating ~~activities and borrowings under credit facilities.~~activities. The primary uses of cash in YTD ~~2015~~2016 and YTD ~~2014~~2015 were ~~payments~~debt repayments, acquisitions of ~~long-term debt,~~Expansion Territories and capital ~~expenditures, territory acquisitions and exchanges, income tax payments, dividend payments, pension payments and payments of capital lease obligations.~~expenditures.

First Nine Months

In Millions

2015

2014

Cash Sources

Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax and pension payments)

$
105.4

$
81.7

Proceeds from revolving credit facilities

269.0

85.0

Proceeds from the sale of business

26.4

-

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

0.3

1.2

Total cash sources

$
401.1

$
167.9

Cash Uses

Payment of $100 million Senior Notes

$
100.0

$
-

Capital expenditures

104.4

61.4

Acquisition of expansion territories

52.7

12.2

Payment of acquisition related contingent consideration

2.4

-

Payments on revolving credit facilities /line of credit

65.0

40.0

Payment on capital lease obligations

4.9

4.4

Dividends

7.0

6.9

Income tax payments

22.4

24.2

Contributions to pension plans

10.5

7.5

Payment for debt issuance costs

0.2

-

Other

0.2

-

Total cash uses

$
369.7

$
156.6

Increase in cash

$
31.4

$
11.3

	First Half
In Millions	2016			2015
Cash Sources:
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility	$	310.0		$	239.0
Borrowings under Term Loan Facility		300.0			-
Cash provided by operating activities (excluding income tax payments)		52.5			41.7
Refund of income tax payments		8.7			-
Other		0.3			0.1
Total cash sources	$	671.5		$	280.8

Cash Uses:
Payment of Revolving Credit Facility	$	235.0		$	20.0
Acquisition of Expansion Territories, net of cash acquired		174.7			51.3
Payment of Senior Notes		164.8			100.0
Additions to property, plant and equipment (exclusive of acquisition)		79.6			57.1
Payment of acquisition related contingent consideration		7.9			0.8
Investment in CONA Services LLC		6.6			-
Cash dividends paid		4.7			4.6
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		3.5			3.3
Income tax payments		-			8.7
Other		0.9			0.3
Total cash uses	$	677.7		$	246.1
Increase (decrease) in cash	$	(6.2	)	$	34.7

Based on current projections, which include a number of assumptions such as the Company’s pre-tax earnings, the Company anticipates its cash requirements for income taxes will be between $5 million and $12 million for the remainder of 2015. This projection does not include any anticipated cash income tax requirements from additional expansion territory transactions.

During YTD ~~2015, cash provided by operating activities increased $22.5 million, as compared to YTD 2014. The increase in~~2016, cash provided by operating activities was ~~primarily due to~~$61.2 million, which was an increase of $28.2 million compared to YTD 2015. The increase was driven primarily by growth in ~~net~~comparable income ~~of $27.3 million~~from operations and ~~an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $11.9 million. Included in net income is an $8.8 million gain on the exchange of franchise territory, a $22.7 million gain~~cash generated from ~~the sale of BYB and a $3.0 million noncash unfavorable fair value adjustment to acquisition related contingent consideration.~~acquired Expansion Territories.

During YTD ~~2015,~~2016, cash used in investing activities ~~increased $58.2~~was $260.7 million, aswhich was an increase of $152.4 million compared to YTD ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was driven by Expansion Transactions and higher levels of capital ~~expenditures and acquisitions of distribution territories offset by cash proceeds from the sale of BYB.~~expenditures.

Additions to property, plant and equipment during YTD ~~2015~~2016 were ~~$104.4~~$79.6 million, of which ~~$6.4~~$9.1 million were accrued in accounts payable, ~~trade as unpaid. This amount excludes $39.8~~trade. The YTD 2016 additions exclude $159.0 million in property, plant and equipment acquired in the ~~distribution territory expansion and exchange transactions~~Expansion Transactions completed in YTD ~~2015.~~2016. This ~~compared~~compares to ~~$61.4~~$57.1 million in additions to property, plant and equipment during YTD ~~2014,~~2015 of which ~~$2.9~~$7.0 million were accrued in accounts payable, ~~trade as unpaid.~~trade. The YTD ~~2014~~2015 additions exclude ~~$8.5~~$39.7 million in property, plant and equipment acquired in the ~~territory expansion~~Expansion Transactions in YTD ~~2014.~~ 2015.

Capital expenditures during YTD ~~2015~~2016 were funded with cash flows from operations and borrowings under available credit facilities. The Company anticipates that additions to property, plant and equipment in 2016 will be in the range of $175 million to $225 million, excluding any additional Expansion Transactions expected to close in 2016.

During YTD ~~2015,~~2016, the Company ~~acquired~~completed the YTD ~~2015~~2016 Expansion ~~Territories~~Transactions to acquire rights to distribution territory in Richmond, Yorktown and ~~completed the Lexington-for-Jackson exchange. The total cash~~Alexandria, Virginia; and Easton, Salisbury, Capital Heights, La Plata, Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland Maryland, and to acquire Regional Manufacturing Facilities in Sandston, Virginia; and Silver Spring and Baltimore, Maryland. Cash used to acquire these ~~expansion~~Expansion Territories and ~~exchange territories~~Regional Manufacturing Facilities, as well as an additional settlement for the Lexington Expansion Territory, was ~~$52.7 million. During~~$174.7 million during YTD ~~2014, the Company acquired franchise territories in Johnson City and Morristown, Tennessee for $12.2 million in cash.~~

~~During Q3 2015, the Company sold BYB to The Coca-Cola Company for a cash purchase price of $26.4 million.~~2016.

Cash used to acquire rights to distribution territory during YTD 2015, including Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee; Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana; Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky; and the Lexington Expansion Territory, was $51.3 million. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on acquisitions.

During YTD ~~2015,~~2016, cash provided by financing activities ~~increased $55.8~~was $193.3 million, aswhich was an increase of $83.3 million compared to YTD ~~2014.~~2015. The increase was primarily a result of providing funding for the acquisitions of Expansion Territories and Regional Manufacturing Facilities and associated capital expenditures. During ~~YTD 2015,~~Q2 2016, the ~~Company’s~~Company entered into a term loan agreement for a senior unsecured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $300 million and had net borrowings ~~under~~on revolving credit facilities of $75.0 million. These increases in debt were partially offset by the ~~Revolving Credit Facility increased $204.0 million primarily to refinance $100~~repayment of $164.8 million of senior notes ~~which matured~~ in ~~April~~Q2 2016. In YTD 2015, the Company had net borrowings on revolving credit facilities of $219.0 million, partially offset by $100.0 million repayment of debt.

See Note 1 to ~~fund~~ the ~~acquisition of new territories, and to fund working capital requirements and capital expenditures. During YTD 2014,~~consolidated financial statements for information on the Company’s net borrowings under the Company’s prior revolving credit facility increased $45 million primarily to fund the acquisition of new territories and to fund seasonal working capital requirements and capital expenditures.significant accounting policies.

The Company is a member of two manufacturing cooperatives and has guaranteed ~~$32.9~~$32.5 million of debt for these entities as of ~~September 27, 2015.~~July 3, 2016. In addition, the Company has an equity ownership in each of the entities. The members of both cooperatives consist solely of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola bottlers. The Company does not anticipate either of these cooperatives will fail to fulfill their commitments. The Company further believes each of these cooperatives has sufficient assets, including production equipment, facilities and working capital, and the ability to adjust selling prices of their products to adequately mitigate the risk of material loss from the Company’s guarantees. As of ~~September 27, 2015,~~July 3, 2016, the Company’s maximum exposure, if the entities borrowed up to their borrowing capacity, would have been ~~$71.6~~$71.5 million including the Company’s equity interests. See Note 12 and Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about these entities.

The Company entered into derivative instruments to hedge certain commodity purchases for 2017, 2016 ~~2015~~ and ~~2014.~~2015. Fees paid by the Company for derivative instruments are amortized over the corresponding period of the instrument. The Company accounts for its commodity hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income reflected as an adjustment of cost of sales or S,D&A expenses.

The Company uses several different financial institutions for commodity derivative instruments to minimize the concentration of credit risk. The Company has master agreements with the counterparties to its derivative financial agreements that provide for net settlement of derivative transactions.

The net impact of the commodity hedges was to decrease cost of sales by $1.2 million in YTD 2016 and to increase cost of sales by ~~$2.5~~$0.7 million in YTD 2015 and to decrease ~~cost of sales by $0.9 million in YTD 2014, and to increase~~ S,D&A expenses by ~~$0.1~~$0.7 million in YTD ~~2015. Commodity hedges did not impact~~2016 and to decrease S,D&A expenses by $0.6 million in YTD ~~2014.~~2015.

~~Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements~~

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2014 a discussion of the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during YTD 2015. Any changes in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the quarter in which a change is made.

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance which changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. The new guidance was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued new guidance that requires an acquirer in a business combination recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early-adopt this new accounting guidance in Q3 2015. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. The new guidance was to be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date to annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on accounting for debt issuance costs. The new guidance requires that all costs incurred to issue debt be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying value of the debt. In August 2015, the FASB issued additional guidance which clarified that an entity can present debt issuance costs of a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued new guidance on whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses, otherwise, the arrangement should be accounted for consistent with other service contracts. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is in process of evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

This Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q,~~10‑Q, as well as information included in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written material, ~~news~~press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain, forward-looking management comments and other statements that reflect management’s current outlook for future periods. ~~The words “believe”, “expect”, “project”, “will”, “should”, “could” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.~~ These statements include, among others, statements relating to:

These statements and expectations are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data along with the Company’s operating plans, and are subject to future events and uncertainties that could cause anticipated events not to occur or actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results. Factors that could impact those statements and expectations or adversely affect future periods include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Company’s Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10‑K for the year ended ~~December 28, 2014 and in Part II, Item 1A of this report.~~January 3, 2016.

Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking statements, which reflect the expectations of management of the Company only as of the time such statements are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The Company is exposed to certain market risks that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company may enter into derivative financial instrument transactions to manage or reduce market risk. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading purposes. A discussion of the Company’s primary market risk exposure and interest rate risk is presented below.

The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its fixed and floating rate ~~debt.~~debt, including the Company’s $450 million revolving credit facility and its $300 million term loan. As of ~~September 27, 2015, $275.0~~July 3, 2016, $375.0 million of the Company’s debt and capital lease obligations of ~~$606.4~~$882.1 million were subject to changes in short-term interest rates.

As it relates to the Company’s variable rate debt, assuming no changes in the Company’s financial structure, if market interest rates average 1% more over the next twelve months than the interest rates as of ~~September 27, 2015,~~July 3, 2016, interest expense for the next twelve months would increase by approximately ~~$2.8~~$3.8 million. This amount was determined by calculating the effect of the hypothetical interest rate on the Company’s variable rate debt. This calculated, hypothetical increase in interest expense for the following twelve months may be different from the actual increase in interest expense from a 1% increase in interest rates due to varying interest rate reset dates on the Company’s floating debt.

The Company’s acquisition related contingent consideration, which is adjusted to fair value at each reporting period, is also impacted by changes in interest rates. The risk free interest rate used to estimate the Company’s WACC is a component of the discount rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows due under the CBAs related to the ~~Completed Phase~~Expansion Territories. As a result, any changes in the underlying risk-free interest rates will impact the fair value of the acquisition related contingent consideration and could materially impact the amount of noncash expense (or income) recorded each reporting period.

The Company is also subject to commodity price risk arising from price movements for certain commodities included as part of its raw ~~materials.~~materials and distribution system. The Company manages this commodity price risk in some cases by entering into contracts with adjustable prices. The Company periodically uses derivative commodity instruments in the management of this risk. The Company estimates that a 10% increase in the market prices of these commodities over the current market prices would cumulatively increase costs during the next 12 months by approximately ~~$25~~$38 million assuming no change in volume.

The Company entered into agreements to hedge a portion of the Company’s 2017, 2016 ~~2015~~ and ~~2014~~2015 commodity purchases.

Fees paid by the Company for agreements to hedge commodity purchases are amortized over the corresponding period of the instruments. The Company accounts for commodity hedges on a mark-to-market basis with any expense or income being reflected as an adjustment to cost of sales or S,D&A expenses.

The annual rate of inflation in the United States, as measured by year-over-year changes in the consumer price index, was ~~.8%~~0.7% in 2015 compared to 0.8% in 2014 ~~compared to~~and 1.5% in ~~2013 and 1.7% in 2012.~~2013. Inflation in the prices of those commodities important to the Company’s business is reflected in changes in the consumer price index, but commodity prices are volatile and in recent years have moved at a faster rate of change than the consumer price index.

The principal effect of inflation in both commodity and consumer prices on the Company’s operating results is to increase costs, both of goods sold and S,D&A. Although the Company can offset these cost increases by increasing selling prices for its products, consumers may not have the buying power to cover these increased costs and may reduce their volume of purchases of those products. In that event, selling price increases may not be sufficient to offset completely the Company’s cost increases.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation,

the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September 27, 2015.~~July 3, 2016.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September 27, 2015~~July 3, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

There have been no material changes to the ~~risk~~ factors ~~included~~disclosed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10‑K for the year ended December 28, 2014, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company’s business and before making any investment decision regarding securities issued or to be issued by the Company. January 3, 2016.

The Company’s participation in the NPSG may create additional risk because we will not exercise sole decision making authority over national product supply system issues that affect the Company and other members of the NPSG Board may have different interests than we do.

Pursuant to the NPSG Governance Agreement, we have agreed to abide by decisions made by the NPSG Board that are made in accordance with the governance processes and principles outlined in the NPSG Governance Charter that is part of the NPSG Agreement. Even though we will be a member of the NPSG Board, we will not exercise sole decision-making authority relating to the decisions of the NPSG Board, and the interests of other members of the NPSG Board may diverge from those of the Company. These may include decisions that are made to benefit the Coca-Cola system as a whole but have a negative impact on our profitability, including decisions regarding strategic investment and divestment, optimal national product supply sourcing and new product or packaging infrastructure planning.

~~Provisions in the Final CBA with The Coca-Cola Company could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.~~

Provisions in the Final CBA require the Company to obtain The Coca-Cola Company’s prior approval of a potential buyer of the Company’s Coca-Cola distribution or manufacturing related businesses, which could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or the ability of the Company to sell such businesses. The Company annually can obtain a list of approved third party buyers from The Coca-Cola Company or, upon receipt of a third party offer to purchase the Company or its Coca-Cola related business, may seek approval of such buyer by The Coca-Cola Company. In addition, the Final CBA contains a sale process that would apply if the Company notifies The Coca-Cola Company that it wishes to sell the distribution or manufacturing business to The Coca-Cola Company, which process includes default terms and conditions of sale and a third party valuation should the Company and The Coca-Cola Company choose to use them. The Final CBA also includes terms that would apply in the event The Coca-Cola Company terminates the Final CBA following the Company’s default thereunder. The Final RMA provides that any transfer of the manufacturing business is subject to the same provisions.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Delaware		56-0950585
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o


Class	Outstanding at ~~October 30, 2015~~August 5, 2016
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value	7,141,447
Class B Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value	~~2,150,782~~2,171,702

		Page

	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	4

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	65

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	76

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	87

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	54

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5554

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	56

Item 6.	Exhibits	5756

	Signatures	5857

In Thousands	January 2016 Expansion Transactions		April 1, 2016 Expansion Transaction		April 29, 2016 Expansion Transactions
Cash	$	179	$	219	$	161
Inventories		10,159		3,748		13,850
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,775		1,736		3,749
Property, plant and equipment		46,100		54,149		58,783
Other assets (including deferred taxes)		2,359		1,434		5,372
Goodwill		10,564		1,943		8,021
Other identifiable intangible assets		1,300		-		23,450
Total acquired assets	$	73,436	$	63,229	$	113,386

Current liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)	$	361	$	742	$	1,307
Other current liabilities		591		2,702		4,391
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company		650		-		-
Other liabilities		-		309		3,117
Other liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)		6,144		23,924		35,561
Total assumed liabilities	$	7,746	$	27,677	$	44,376

	Johnson City/
	Morristown		Knoxville
In Thousands	Territory		Territory
Cash	$	46	$	108
Inventories		1,150		2,100
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		548		1,905
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company		496	0
Property, plant and equipment		8,495		17,229
Other assets		142		1,019
Goodwill		557		4,684
Other identifiable intangible assets		13,800		37,400
Total acquired assets	$	25,234	$	64,445

Current liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)	$	1,005	$	2,426
Current liabilities		23		2,351
Accounts payable to The Coca-Cola Company	0			105
Other liabilities (including deferred taxes)		473		796
Other liabilities (acquisition related contingent consideration)		11,564		27,834
Total assumed liabilities	$	13,065	$	33,512

	Lexington
	Expansion
In Thousands	Territory
Cash	$	56
Inventories		2,231
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		345
Accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company		362
Property, plant and equipment		12,216
Other assets		48
Franchise rights		23,700
Goodwill		1,856
Other identifiable intangible assets		1,100
Total acquired assets	$	41,914

Current liabilities	$	926
Total assumed liabilities	$	926

	Lexington
	Expansion		Estimated
In Thousands	Territory		Useful Lives
Franchise rights	$	23,700	Indefinite
Distribution agreements		300	40 years
Customer lists		800	12 years
Total acquired identifiable intangible assets	$	24,800

	July 3, 2016
In Thousands	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Total, net		Useful Lives
Distribution agreements	$	157,555	$	5,373	$	152,182	20-40 years
Customer lists and other identifiable intangible assets		13,338		5,053		8,285	12-20 years
Total other identifiable intangible assets	$	170,893	$	10,426	$	160,467

	January 3, 2016
In Thousands	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Total, net		Useful Lives
Distribution agreements	$	133,109	$	3,323	$	129,786	20-40 years
Customer lists and other identifiable intangible assets		11,338		4,676		6,662	12-20 years
Total other identifiable intangible assets	$	144,447	$	7,999	$	136,448

	June 28, 2015
In Thousands	Cost		Accumulated Amortization		Total, net		Useful Lives
Distribution agreements	$	102,209	$	6,579	$	95,630	20-40 years
Customer lists and other identifiable intangible assets		10,188		-		10,188	12-20 years
Total other identifiable intangible assets	$	112,397	$	6,579	$	105,818

In Thousands	Maturity	Interest Rate		Interest Paid	July 3, 2016			January 3, 2016			June 28, 2015
Revolving credit facility	2019	Variable		Varies	$	75,000		$	-		$	290,000
Senior Notes	2016		5.00%	Semi-annually		-			164,757			164,757
Senior Notes	2019		7.00%	Semi-annually		110,000			110,000			110,000
Senior Notes	2025		3.80%	Semi-annually		350,000			350,000			-
Term Loan	2021	Variable		Varies		300,000			-			-
Unamortized discount on Senior Notes	2019					(683	)		(792	)		(897	)
Unamortized discount on Senior Notes	2025					(82	)		(86	)		-
Debt issuance costs						(4,417	)		(4,251	)		(1,749	)
Total debt						829,818			619,628			562,111
Less: Current portion of debt						-			-			-
Long-term debt					$	829,818		$	619,628		$	562,111

In Thousands	Balance Sheet Classification	July 3, 2016		January 3, 2016		June 28, 2015
Assets:
Commodity hedges at fair market value	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	102	$	-	$	428
Commodity hedges at fair market value	Other assets		560		3		147
Total assets		$	662	$	3	$	575

Liabilities:
Commodity hedges at fair market value	Other accrued liabilities	$	291	$	3,442	$	569
Commodity hedges at fair market value	Other liabilities		-		-		112
Total liabilities		$	291	$	3,442	$	681

In Thousands	April 3, 2016			Pre-tax Activity			Tax Effect			July 3, 2016
Net pension activity:
Actuarial loss	$	(67,788	)	$	740		$	(285	)	$	(67,333	)
Prior service costs		(74	)		7			(2	)		(69	)
Net postretirement benefits activity:
Actuarial loss		(19,465	)		588			(227	)		(19,104	)
Prior service costs		5,228			(840	)		324			4,712
Foreign currency translation adjustment		5			(8	)		2			(1	)
Total	$	(82,094	)	$	487		$	(188	)	$	(81,795	)

In Thousands	March 29, 2015			Pre-tax Activity			Tax Effect			June 28, 2015
Net pension activity:
Actuarial loss	$	(74,378	)	$	795		$	(307	)	$	(73,890	)
Prior service costs		(94	)		9			(3	)		(88	)
Net postretirement benefits activity:
Actuarial loss		(22,319	)		718			(277	)		(21,878	)
Prior service costs		7,296			(840	)		324			6,780
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(5	)		1			(1	)		(5	)
Total	$	(89,500	)	$	683		$	(264	)	$	(89,081	)

In Thousands	December 28, 2014			Pre-tax Activity			Tax Effect			June 28, 2015
Net pension activity:
Actuarial loss	$	(74,867	)	$	1,591		$	(614	)	$	(73,890	)
Prior service costs		(99	)		18			(7	)		(88	)
Net postretirement benefits activity:
Actuarial loss		(22,759	)		1,435			(554	)		(21,878	)
Prior service costs		7,812			(1,680	)		648			6,780
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1	)		(6	)		2			(5	)
Total	$	(89,914	)	$	1,358		$	(525	)	$	(89,081	)

In Thousands	June 29, 2014			Pre-tax Activity			Tax Effect			Sept. 28, 2014
Net pension activity:
Actuarial loss	$	(42,510	)	$	450		$	(173	)	$	(42,233	)
Prior service costs		(110	)		9			(4	)		(105	)
Net postretirement benefits activity:
Actuarial loss		(17,750	)		562			(218	)		(17,406	)
Prior service costs		2,945			(377	)		146			2,714
Foreign currency translation adjustment		4			(6	)		2		0
Total	$	(57,421	)	$	638		$	(247	)	$	(57,030	)

In Thousands	Dec. 28, 2014			Pre-tax Activity			Tax Effect			Sept. 27, 2015
Net pension activity:
Actuarial loss	$	(74,867	)	$	2,386		$	(919	)	$	(73,400	)
Prior service costs		(99	)		27			(9	)		(81	)
Net postretirement benefits activity:
Actuarial loss		(22,759	)		2,152			(829	)		(21,436	)
Prior service costs		7,812			(2,520	)		970			6,262
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1	)		(6	)		3			(4	)
Total	$	(89,914	)	$	2,039		$	(784	)	$	(88,659	)

In Thousands	Dec. 29, 2013			Pre-tax Activity			Tax Effect			Sept. 28, 2014
Net pension activity:
Actuarial loss	$	(43,028	)	$	1,294		$	(499	)	$	(42,233	)
Prior service costs		(121	)		27			(11	)		(105	)
Net postretirement benefits activity:
Actuarial loss		(18,441	)		1,688			(653	)		(17,406	)
Prior service costs		3,410			(1,133	)		437			2,714
Foreign currency translation adjustment		4			(6	)		2		0
Total	$	(58,176	)	$	1,870		$	(724	)	$	(57,030	)

Territory	Asset Agreement Date	Acquisition Closing
~~Territory~~	~~Date~~	Date
Johnson City and Morristown, Tennessee	May 7, 2014	May 23, 2014
Knoxville, Tennessee	August 28, 2014	October 24, 2014
Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee	December 5, 2014	January 30, 2015
Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana	December 17, 2014	February 27, 2015
Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky	February 13, 2015	May 1, 2015
Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton, Virginia and Elizabeth City, North Carolina	September 23, 2015	October 30, 2015
Richmond and Yorktown, Virginia and Easton and Salisbury, Maryland	September 23, 2015	January 29, 2016
Sandston Regional Manufacturing Facility	October 30, 2015	January 29, 2016
Alexandria, Virginia and Capitol Heights and La Plata, Maryland	September 23, 2015	April 1, 2016
Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland, Maryland	September 23, 2015	April 29, 2016
Silver Springs and Baltimore Regional Manufacturing Facility	October 30, 2015	April 29, 2016

Denominator for basic net income per Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share:
Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding – basic		7,141		7,141		7,141		7,141
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding – basic		2,151		2,130		2,146		2,125

Denominator for diluted net income per Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share:
Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding – diluted (assumes conversion of Class B Common Stock to Common Stock)		9,332		9,311		9,327		9,306
Class B Common Stock weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		2,191		2,170		2,186		2,165

Basic net income per share:
Common Stock	$	2.75	$	1.31	$	5.89	$	3.06

Class B Common Stock	$	2.75	$	1.31	$	5.89	$	3.06

Diluted net income per share:
Common Stock	$	2.74	$	1.30	$	5.87	$	3.05

Class B Common Stock	$	2.73	$	1.30	$	5.85	$	3.04

	Acquisition / Exchange	(Net) Cash Purchase Price
Territory	Date	(In Millions)
Johnson City and Morristown, Tennessee	May 23, 2014	$	12.2
Knoxville, Tennessee	October 24, 2014		30.9
Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee	January 30, 2015		13.8
Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana	February 27, 2015		19.8
Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky	May 1, 2015		7.5
Lexington, Kentucky for Jackson, Tennessee Exchange	May 1, 2015		10.3

Territory	Acquisition / Exchange Date	Net Cash Purchase Price (In Millions)
Johnson City and Morristown, Tennessee	May 23, 2014	$	12.2
Knoxville, Tennessee	October 24, 2014		30.9
Cleveland and Cookeville, Tennessee	January 30, 2015		13.2
Louisville, Kentucky and Evansville, Indiana	February 27, 2015		18.0
Paducah and Pikeville, Kentucky	May 1, 2015	7.5*
Lexington, Kentucky for Jackson, Tennessee Exchange	May 1, 2015		15.3
Norfolk, Fredericksburg and Staunton, Virginia and Elizabeth City, North Carolina	October 30, 2015	26.1*
Annapolis, Maryland Ready Made Center	October 30, 2015	5.3*
Easton and Salisbury, Maryland, Richmond and Yorktown, Virginia, and Sandston, Virginia Regional Manufacturing Facility	January 29, 2016	65.7*
Alexandria, Virginia and Capitol Heights and La Plata, Maryland	April 1, 2016	35.6*
Baltimore, Hagerstown and Cumberland, Maryland, and Silver Spring and Baltimore, Maryland Regional Manufacturing Facilities	April 29, 2016	69.0*

Q3 2015			Attributable to:
(In Millions)
Q2 2016				Q2 2016		Attributable to:
$	107.4		Net sales increase related to the Completed Phase Territories, reduced by the 2014 comparable sales of the legacy territory exchanged for expansion territories in 2015	211.7		Net sales increase related to the 2015 Expansion Territories and the YTD 2016 Expansion Transactions, partially offset by the 2015 comparable sales of the Legacy Territory exchanged for Expansion Territories in 2015
	23.9		6.8% increase in bottle/can sales volume to retail customers in the Company's legacy territories, primarily due to an increase in energy beverages, including MEC Products, and still beverages	19.8		4.5% increase in bottle/can sales volume to retail customers in the Legacy Territory and 2014 Expansion Territories, primarily due to an increase in still beverages
	20.1		5.4% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit to retail customers in the Company's legacy territories, primarily due to an increase in energy beverage volume, including MEC Products (which have a higher sales price per unit), and an increase in all beverage categories sales price per unit, except the water beverage category	(9.8	)	Decrease in sales of the Company's own brand products primarily due to sale of BYB during the third quarter of 2015
	6.3		Increase in external transportation revenue	7.6		Increase in external transportation revenue
	4.9		11.8% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers, primarily due to a volume increase in all beverage categories	(2.6	)	0.6% decrease in bottle/can sales price per unit to retail customers in the Legacy Territory and 2014 Expansion Territories, primarily due to a decrease in sparkling beverage categories
	(3.0	)	Decrease in sales of the Company's own brand products primarily due to the sale of BYB during Q3 2015	1.0		3.8% increase in post-mix sales volume
	1.5		Other	(2.0	)	Other
$	161.1		Total increase in net sales	225.7		Total increase in net sales

	Bottle/Can Sales Volume						Bottle/Can Sales Volume		Bottle/Can Sales Volume						Bottle/Can Sales Volume
Product Category	Q3 2015			Q3 2014			% Increase		Q2 2016			Q2 2015			Increase
Sparkling beverages (including energy products)		75.4	%		77.4	%		28.5
Still beverages		24.6	%		22.6	%		43.6
Sparkling beverages										69.7	%		71.5	%		37.1	%
Still beverages (including energy products)										30.3	%		28.5	%		49.2	%
Total bottle/can sales volume		100.0	%		100.0	%		32.0		100.0	%		100.0	%		40.6	%

Q2 2016		Attributable to:
$	35.4	Increase in employee salaries including bonus and incentives due to normal salary increases and additional personnel added from the Expansion Territories
	5.8	Increase in depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment primarily due to depreciation for fleet and vending equipment in the Expansion Territories
	3.4	Increase in employee benefit costs primarily due to additional medical expense and 401k employer matching contributions for employees from the Expansion Territories
	3.2	Increase in employer payroll taxes primarily due to payroll in the Expansion Territories
	2.8	Increase in expenses related to the Company's Expansion Transactions, primarily professional fees related to due diligence
	2.7	Increase in marketing expense primarily due to increased spending for promotional items and media and cold drink sponsorships
	1.8	Increase in vending and fountain parts expense due to the addition of the Expansion Territories
	1.7	Increase in professional fees primarily due to additional compliance and technology expenses
	1.2	Increase in software expenses primarily due to investment in technology for the Expansion Territories
	1.1	Increase in property, vehicle and other taxes due to the Expansion Territories
	1.1	Increase in facilities expenses due to additional facilities from the Expansion Territories
	5.8	Other
$	66.0	Total increase in S,D&A expenses

YTD 2015			Attributable to:
(In Millions)
YTD 2016				YTD 2016		Attributable to:
$	265.9		Net sales increase related to the Completed Phase Territories, reduced by the 2014 comparable sales of the legacy territory exchanged for expansion territories in 2015	329.4		Net sales increase related to the 2015 Expansion Territories and YTD 2016 Expansion Territories, partially offset by the 2015 comparable sales of the Legacy Territory exchanged for Expansion Territories in 2015
	47.7		4.5% increase in bottle/can sales price per unit to retail customers in the Company's legacy territories, primarily due to an increase in energy beverage volume, including MEC Products (which have a higher sales price per unit), and an increase in all beverage categories sales price per unit except the water beverage category	45.8		5.8% increase in bottle/can sales volume to retail customer in the Legacy Territory and 2014 Expansion Territories, primarily due to an increase in still beverages
	42.1		4.2% increase in bottle/can sales volume to retail customers in the Company's legacy territories, primarily due to an increase in energy beverages, including MEC Products, and still beverages	16.5		2.0% increase in bottle/cans sales price per unit to retail customers in the Legacy Territory and 2014 Expansion Territories, primarily due to an increase in still beverages
	17.5		Increase in external transportation revenue	(16.7	)	Decrease in sales of the Company's own brand products, primarily due to the sale of BYB in the third quarter of 2015
	7.0		5.6% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers, primarily due to a volume increase in all beverage categories	14.4		Increase in external transportation revenue
	2.4		1.8% increase in sales price per unit of sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers, primarily due to a higher percentage of energy products, including MEC Products, and still beverages (which have a higher sales price per unit than non-energy sparkling beverages)	4.2		4.8% increase in sales volume to other Coca-Cola bottlers for legacy manufacturing operations, primarily due to a volume increase in still beverages
	(2.7	)	Decrease in sales of the Company's own brand products primarily due to the sale of BYB during Q3 2015	2.1		4.5% increase in post-mix sales volume
	2.2		3.3% increase in post-mix sales price per unit	1.7		3.5% increase in post-mix sales price per unit
	(1.1	)	Other	0.5		Other
$	381.0		Total increase in net sales	397.9		Total increase in net sales

Customer	YTD 2016			YTD 2015
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Approximate percent of Company's total Bottle/can volume		20	%		22	%
Approximate percent of Company's total Net sales		14	%		15	%

Food Lion, LLC
Approximate percent of Company's total Bottle/can volume		8	%		8	%
Approximate percent of Company's total Net sales		6	%		5	%

	September 27,		Dec. 28,		September 28,
In Thousands	2015		2014		2014		July 3, 2016		January 3, 2016		June 28, 2015
Debt	$	548,912	$	444,759	$	443,709	$	829,818	$	619,628	$	562,111
Capital lease obligations		57,450		59,050		60,568		52,296		55,784		59,153
Total debt and capital lease obligations		606,362		503,809		504,277		882,114		675,412		621,264
Less: Cash and cash equivalents		40,491		9,095		23,067		49,323		55,498		43,801
Total net debt and capital lease obligations⁽¹⁾	$	565,871	$	494,714	$	481,210	$	832,791	$	619,914	$	577,463

Exhibit Number		Description

4.1		The registrant, by signing this report, agrees to furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of any instrument which defines the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries which authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10 percent of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
10.1		Term Loan Agreement, dated June 7, 2016, by and among the Company, the lenders named therein, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and PNC Bank, National Association and Branch Banking and Trust Company as co-syndication agents (filed herewith).

10.2*		CONA Services LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated January 27, 2016, by and among the Company, The Coca‑Cola Company, Coca‑Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and the other bottlers named therein (filed herewith).

10.3*		Amendment No. 1 to the CONA Services LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2016 and effective as of April 2, 2016, by and among the Company, The Coca‑Cola Company, Coca‑Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and the other bottlers name therein (filed herewith).

10.4*		Master Services Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2016 and effective as of April 2, 2016, between the Company and CONA Services LLC (filed herewith).

12		Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (filed herewith).

31.1		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished (and not filed) herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K).

101		Financial statements (unaudited) from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ~~Coca-Cola~~Coca‑Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated for the quarter ended ~~September 27, 2015,~~July 3, 2016, filed on ~~November 6, 2015,~~August 12, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. *Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

	~~COCA-COLA~~COCA‑COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
	(REGISTRANT)

Date: ~~November 6, 2015~~August 12, 2016	By:	/s/ ~~James E. Harris~~Clifford M. Deal, III
		~~James E. Harris~~
		~~Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant~~
		~~and~~Clifford M. Deal, III
		Senior Vice President, ~~Shared Services~~Chief Financial Officer
		~~and~~(Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant)
		~~Chief Financial Officer~~



Date: ~~November 6, 2015~~August 12, 2016	By:	/s/ William J. Billiard
		William J. Billiard
		~~Principal~~Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer ~~of the Registrant~~
		~~and~~(Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant)
		~~Chief Accounting Officer~~