UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED December 31, 2017September 30, 2020

OR

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM          TO         

Commission File Number 0-19658

TUESDAY MORNING CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

6250 LBJ Freeway

Dallas, Texas 75240

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(972) 387-3562

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

2

PART I — FINANCIALFINANCIAL INFORMATION

Tuesday Morning Corporation

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2017September 30, 2020 (unaudited) and June 30, 20172020

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Tuesday Morning Corporation

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)

Three Months Ended

September 30, 2020 and 2019

(In thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Tuesday Morning Corporation

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Tuesday Morning Corporation

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

56

Tuesday Morning Corporation

(Debtor-in-Possession)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The terms “Tuesday Morning,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” as used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refer to Tuesday Morning Corporation and its subsidiaries.  Other than as disclosed in this document, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 for our critical accounting policies.

1.     Basis of presentation — The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of those of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the results of the interim periods presented and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2020. The consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 20172020 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but doesdate. These interim financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. 2020. 

The resultsaccompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of operationsTuesday Morning Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its wholly‑owned subsidiaries.  All entities of the Company were included in the filing of a voluntary petition (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the threeNorthern District of Texas, Dallas Division (the “Bankruptcy Court”) and six month periods ended December 31, 2017all entities are included in our consolidated financial statements, thus separate condensed combined financial statements of the entities in the reorganization proceedings are not necessarily indicativerequired.  All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We operate our business as a single operating segment.  Certain reclassifications were made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.  None of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, which we refer to as fiscal 2018.

reclassifications affected our net loss in any period.  We do not present a consolidated statement of comprehensive income as there are no other comprehensive income items in either the current or prior fiscal periods.

The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, which we refer to as fiscal 2021, due in part to the seasonality of our business and the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including bankruptcy proceedings, discussed further below.

The preparation of unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires us to make assumptions and use estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The most significant estimates relate to:to inventory valuation under the retail method and estimation of reserves and valuation allowances specifically related to insurance, income taxes and litigation. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.  The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the difficulty in making various estimates in our financial statements.  Our fiscal year ends on June 30 and we operate our business as a single operating segment.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and could continue to have, an adverse effect on our business operations, store traffic, employee availability, financial conditions, results of operations, liquidity and cash flow.

On March 25, 2020, we temporarily closed all of our stores nationwide, severely reducing revenues and resulting in significant operating losses and the elimination of substantially all operating cash flow. Stores gradually reopened as allowed by state and local jurisdictions, and all but 2 of our stores had reopened as of the end of the prior fiscal year.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2021, we completed the permanent closure of 197 stores.  The scope and duration of this pandemic and the related disruption to our business and financial impacts cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.  While we have taken actions to minimize costs, some of which are permanent including the closure of 197 stores and the planned closure of our Phoenix distribution center, and mitigate the related risks, there can be no assurance that these measures will continue to provide benefit or that they will be adequate to mitigate future changes in circumstances.

Voluntary Petitions for Reorganization under Chapter 11

On May 27, 2020 (the “Petition Date”), we filed the Chapter 11 Cases.  The Chapter 11 Cases are being jointly administered for procedural purposes.

7

Significant Bankruptcy Court Actions

We will continue to operate our businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court.  On May 28, 2020, at the first-day hearings of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Bankruptcy Court granted relief in conjunction with various motions intended to ensure our ability to continue our ordinary operations after the Petition Date.  The Bankruptcy Court’s orders granting such relief, entered on May 28, 2020 and May 29, 2020, authorized us to, among other things, pay certain pre-petition employee and retiree expenses and benefits, use our existing cash management system, maintain and administer customer programs, pay certain critical and foreign vendors and pay certain pre-petition taxes and related fees. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court issued orders approving, among other things, (1) our entry into the Senior Secured Super Priority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement (the “DIP ABL Credit Agreement”) among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, for itself and the other lenders, which provides for a super priority secured debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100 million (the “DIP ABL Facility”), and (2) our use of cash collateral in accordance with the terms of the DIP ABL Credit Agreement.  See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the DIP ABL Facility.

These orders are significant because they allow us to operate our businesses in the normal course.

The Bankruptcy Court has issued orders designed to assist us in preserving certain tax attributes by establishing, among other things, notification and hearing procedures (the “Procedures”) relating to proposed transfers of its common stock and the taking of worthless stock deductions. The Procedures, among other things, restrict transfers involving, and require notice of the holdings of and proposed transactions by any person or “entity” (as defined the applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations) owning or seeking to acquire ownership of 4.5% or more of the Company’s common stock. The Bankruptcy Court orders provide that any actions in violation of the Procedures (including the notice requirements) would be null and void ab initio, and (a) the person or entity making such a transfer would be required to take remedial actions specified by us to appropriately reflect that such transfer of our common stock is null and void ab initio and (b) the person or entity making such a declaration of worthlessness with respect to our common stock would be required to file an amended tax return revoking such declaration and any related deduction to reflect that such declaration is void ab initio.

On June 9, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order approving procedures for the closure of up to 230 of our store locations.  In early June 2020, we commenced the process to close 132 store locations in a first wave of store closings.  By the end of July 2020, all of these stores were permanently closed.  In mid-July 2020, we began the process to close an additional 65 stores following negotiations with our landlords, and those store closures were completed in August 2020.  In the first quarter of fiscal 2021, we recorded abandonment charges of $4.8 million, related to our Phoenix distribution center closure plan.  We expect to close our Phoenix, Arizona distribution center in the second quarter of fiscal 2021.  

On July 10, 2020, in accordance with a final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on July 10, 2020, we entered into a Senior Secured Super Priority Debtor-In-Possession Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreement (the “DIP DDTL Agreement”) with the Franchise Group, Inc. (the “Lender”). Pursuant to the DIP DDTL Agreement, the Lender agreed to lend us up to an aggregate principal amount of $25 million in the form of delayed draw term loans (the “DIP Term Facility”).  See Note 3 for additional information.

On September 23, 2020, the Company and its subsidiaries filed with the Bankruptcy Court a proposed Joint Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Plan”) and a proposed Disclosure Statement in Support of the Joint Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Disclosure Statement”) describing the Plan and the solicitation of votes to approve the same from certain of the Debtors’ creditors with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases.

On September 23, 2020, contemporaneously with the filing of the Plan and Disclosure Statement, the Company and its subsidiaries filed an expedited motion for entry of an order (1) approving sale and bidding procedures in connection with a potential sale of assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, (2) authorizing the sale of assets free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests, and (3) granting related relief (the “Bidding Procedures Motion”). The Company believes that the concurrent prosecution of a plan of reorganization and a court-approved process for bidding and potential sale of substantially all of their assets will allow the Company and its subsidiaries to assess the relative benefits of a plan of reorganization and a sale.  The Bidding Procedures Motion provided that the Bankruptcy Court would consider approval of a sale of assets on October 29, 2020 if the Company determined to proceed with a sale of assets.

On October 26, 2020, the Company and its subsidiaries filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court indicating the Company would not be seeking approval of a sale of assets on October 29, 2020.  On October 26, 2020, the Company also filed a motion indicating the Company was working to make revisions to the Plan and Disclosure Statement and seeking to establish a hearing on November 9, 2020 for consideration of a revised Plan and Disclosure Statement.  The Company reserved the right to continue to pursue a sale of assets if the Company determines that a sale of assets is in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate.

8

On November 4, 2020, the Company and its subsidiaries filed with the Bankruptcy Court a proposed Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Amended Plan”) and a proposed Amended Disclosure Statement (the “Amended Disclosure Statement”) in support of the Amended Plan describing the Amended Plan and the solicitation of votes to approve the same from certain of the Debtors’ creditors with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases.  The Amended Plan and the Amended Disclosure Statement contemplate the proposed financing transactions described in Note 13 below, including the transactions contemplated by the Purchase and Sale Agreement (as defined in Note 13), the proposed New ABL Facility (as defined in Note 13) and the proposed Rights Offering (as defined in Note 13).  Pursuant to the proposed Amended Plan, in exchange for each existing share of the Company’s common stock, an eligible holder would receive (1) one share of the Company’s common stock and (2) a share purchase right entitling the holder to purchase its pro rata portion of shares available to eligible holders in the Rights Offering.

Information contained in the Amended Plan and the Amended Disclosure Statement, including the proposal to conduct a Rights Offering, is subject to change, whether as a result of amendments or supplements to the Amended Plan or the Amended Disclosure Statement, third-party actions, or otherwise, and should not be relied upon by any party.

De-listing

On May 27, 2020, the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) notifying it that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases and in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rules 5101, 5110(b) and IM-5101-1, Nasdaq determined that the Company’s common stock will be delisted from Nasdaq. On June 8, 2020, trading of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq was suspended.  On July 1, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 with the SEC to delist the Company’s common stock. The Company’s common stock now trades over the counter in the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “TUESQ”.

Going Concern

Our operating loss for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 was $159.2 million, and our operating loss was $16.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2020.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting store closures severely reduced our revenues and operating cash flows during the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 as well as the first quarter of fiscal 2021.  As described further above, on May 27, 2020, we commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy Court. The filing of the Chapter 11 Cases constituted an event of default that caused our obligations under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement (as defined below in Note 8 “Debt”) to become immediately due and payable. We believe that any efforts to enforce such payment obligations under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement were stayed as a result of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, and the creditors’ rights of enforcement with respect to the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement are subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Court orders modifying the stay, including the order of the Bankruptcy Court approving the DIP ABL Facility.

Although we are seeking to address any liquidity concerns through the Chapter 11 Cases, the approval of a plan of reorganization or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets is not within our control and uncertainty remains as to whether the Bankruptcy Court will approve a plan of reorganization or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that would result if the Company was unable to realize its assets and settle its liabilities as a going concern in the ordinary course of business.  We believe that our plans, already implemented and continuing to be implemented, will mitigate the conditions and events that have raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.  However, due to the uncertainty around the scope and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related disruption to our business and financial impacts, and because our plans, including those in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, are not yet finalized, fully executed, or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, they cannot be deemed probable of mitigating this substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Bankruptcy Accounting

See Note 2 entitled “Bankruptcy Accounting” for additional information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases.

Accounting Pronouncement Recently Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” (“ASC 326”), which makes significant changes to the accounting for credit losses on financial assets and disclosures.  The standard requires immediate recognition of management’s estimates of current expected credit losses.  We adopted ASC 326 in the first quarter of fiscal 2021.  The adoption did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

9

2.     Bankruptcy Accounting

Bankruptcy Accounting

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business and reflect the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852, “Reorganizations” (“ASC 852”). ASC 852 requires that the consolidated financial statements, for periods subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, gains and losses that are realized or incurred in the bankruptcy proceedings are recorded in reorganization items on our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, pre-petition unsecured and under-secured obligations that may be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process have been classified as liabilities subject to compromise on our unaudited interim consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2020.  

As of September 30, 2020, these liabilities were reported at the amounts expected to be allowed as claims by the Bankruptcy Court. Where there was uncertainty about whether a secured claim would be paid or impaired pursuant to the Chapter 11 Cases, we classified the entire amount of the claim as an outstanding liability subject to compromise as of September 30, 2020. For specific discussion on balances of liabilities subject to compromise and reorganization items, see below. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of the Chapter 11 Cases. In particular, the consolidated financial statements do not purport to show: (i) the realizable value of assets on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (ii) the full amount of pre-petition liabilities that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (iii) the effect on stockholders’ investment accounts of any changes that may be made to our capitalization; or (iv) the effect on operations of any changes that may be made to our business.

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the payment of pre-petition indebtedness was subject to compromise. Generally, actions to enforce or otherwise effect payment of pre-bankruptcy filing liabilities are stayed. Although payment of pre-petition claims is generally not permitted, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Company authority to pay certain pre-petition claims in designated categories and subject to certain terms and conditions. This relief generally was designed to preserve the value of our businesses and assets. Among other things, the Bankruptcy Court authorized the Company to pay certain pre-petition claims relating to employee wages and benefits, customers, vendors, and suppliers in the ordinary course of business as well as certain insurance, tax, and principal and interest payments. We have been paying and intend to continue to pay undisputed post-petition claims in the ordinary course of business. With respect to pre-petition claims, we notified all known claimants of the deadline to file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy Court. Our liabilities subject to compromise represent the estimate as of September 30, 2020 of claims expected.  Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise were required to be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. Liabilities subject to compromise in our condensed consolidated balance sheet include the following as of September 30, 2020 (in thousands):

10

Restructuring, Impairment and Abandonment Charges

Restructuring and abandonment charges total $5.5 million for the first fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020, and include the following (in thousands):

The restructuring and abandonment costs shown above primarily relate to our permanent store and Phoenix, Arizona distribution center closing plans.  These decisions were made in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, prior to filing the Chapter 11 Cases.

Reorganization Items

Reorganization items included in our consolidated statement of operations represent amounts directly resulting from the Chapter 11 Cases and total a net benefit of $37.6 million for the first fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020, and include the following (in thousands):

During the first quarter of fiscal 2021, the leases for store locations related to our permanent closure plan were rejected and the related lease liabilities were reduced to the amount of estimated claims allowable by the bankruptcy court, resulting in the $47.5 million gain shown above.

Cash paid for reorganization items during the first fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020 was $10.2 million and related to professional and legal fees.  As of September 30, 2020, $4.3 million of professional fees were unpaid and accrued in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

3.     Revenue recognition — Our revenue is earned from sales of merchandise within our stores and is recorded at the point of sale and conveyance of merchandise to customers. Revenue is measured based on the amount of consideration that we expect to receive, reduced by point of sale discounts and estimates for sales returns, and excludes sales tax.  Payment for our sales is due at the time of sale.  We maintain a reserve for estimated returns, as well as a corresponding returns asset in “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and we use historical customer return behavior to estimate our reserve requirements.  NaN impairment of the returns asset was identified or recorded as of September 30, 2020.  Gift cards are sold to customers in our stores and we issue gift cards for merchandise returns in our stores. Revenue from sales of gift cards and issuances of merchandise credits is recognized when the gift card is redeemed by the customer, or if the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote (gift card breakage). The gift card breakage rate is determined based upon historical redemption patterns. An estimate of the rate of gift card breakage is applied over the period of estimated performance and the breakage amounts are included in net sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.  Breakage income recognized was less than $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2021 and was $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2020.   The gift card liability is included in “Accrued liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  We will continue to evaluate whether and how store closures may affect customer behavior with respect to sales returns and gift card redemption and related breakage.

4.     Share-based incentive plans — Stock Option Awards. We have established the Tuesday Morning Corporation 2004 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2004 Plan”), the Tuesday Morning Corporation 2008 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and the Tuesday Morning Corporation 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2014 Plan”), which allow for the granting of stock options to directors, officers and key employees of the Company, and certain other key individuals who perform services for us and our subsidiaries. Equity awards may no longer be granted under the 2004 Plan or the 2008 Plan, but equity awards granted under the 2004 Plan and the 2008 Plan are still outstanding.

On November 16, 2016, our stockholders approved amendments to the 2014 Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Plan by 2,500,000 shares and to make additional amendments to the 2014 Plan, including (i) reducing the percentage of shares exempt from the minimum vesting requirements under the 2014 Plan, (ii) adding a clawback policy, (iii) generally eliminating the discretion of the Board of Directors to accelerate the vesting of outstanding and unvested awards upon a change of control and (iv) providing that certain shares surrendered in payment of the exercise price of awards or withheld for tax withholding would count against the shares available under the 2014 Plan.11

Stock options were awarded under the 2008 Plan and the 2014 Plan with a strike price at a fair market value equal to the average of the high and low trading prices of our common stock on the date of grant under the 2004 Plan. Stock options were awarded with a strike price at a fair market value equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of the grant under the 2008 Plan and the 2014 Plan.grant.

Options granted under the 2004 Plan typically vest over periods of one to five years and expire ten years from the date of grant, while options granted under the 2008 Plan and the 2014 Plan typically vest over periods of one to four years and expire ten years from the date of grant.  Options granted under the 2004 Plan, the 2008 Plan and the 2014 Plan may have certain performance requirements in addition to service terms. If the performance conditions are not satisfied, the options are forfeited. The exercise prices of stock options outstanding on December 31, 2017,September 30, 2020 range between $1.24$1.64 per share and $20.91 per share.  All shares available under the 2004 Plan have been granted. The 2004 Plan and the 2008 Plan terminated as to new awards as of May 17, 2014 and September 16, 2014, respectively.2014.  There were 3.03.5 million shares available for grant under the 2014 Plan at December 31, 2017.September 30, 2020.

Restricted Stock Awards—The 2004 Plan, the 2008 Plan and the 2014 Plan authorize the grant of restricted stock awards to directors, officers, key employees and certain other key individuals who perform services for us and our subsidiaries.  Equity awards may no longer be granted under the 2004 Plan and the 2008 Plan, but restricted stock awards granted under the 2004 Plan and the 2008 Plan are still outstanding.  Restricted stock awards are not transferable, but bear certain rights of common stock ownership including voting and dividend rights.  The 2014 Plan also authorizes the issuance of restricted stock units which, upon vesting, provide for the issuance of an equivalent number of shares of common stock or a cash payment based on the value of our common stock at vesting.  Restricted units are not transferable and do not provide voting or dividend rights.  Shares and units are valued at the fair market value of our common stock aton the date of award.the grant.  Shares and units may be subject to certain performance requirements. If the performance requirements are not met, the restricted shares or units are forfeited.  Under the 2004 Plan, the 2008 Plan and the 2014 Plan, as of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2020, there were 1,607,1501,177,396 shares of restricted stock and 1,094,785 restricted stock units outstanding

6

with award vesting periods, both performance-based and service-based, of one to four years and a weighted average grant date fair value of $4.29$2.28 and $1.90 per share.share, respectively.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards and Performance-Based Stock Option Awards.  As of December 31, 2017September 30, 2020, there were 1,641,513287,348 unvested performance-based restricted stock awards and performance-based restricted stock option awardsunits payable in cash outstanding under the 2014 Plan.

Share-based Compensation Costs.   Share-based compensation costs were recognized as follows (in thousands):

3.5.     Commitments and contingencies — WeInformation related to the Chapter 11 Cases that were filed on May 27, 2020 is included in Note 1.

In addition, we are involved in legal and governmental proceedings as part of the normal course of our business. Reserves have been established when a loss is considered probable and are based on management'smanagement’s best estimates of our potential liability in these matters. These estimates have been developed in consultation with internal and external counsel and are based on a combination of litigation and settlement strategies.  Management believes that such litigation and claims will be resolved without material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

6.Leases— We conduct substantially all operations from leased facilities, with the exception of the corporate headquarters in Dallas and the Dallas warehouse, distribution and retail complex, which are owned facilities.  The Companyother warehouse facility, which we plan to permanently close in the second quarter of fiscal 2021, and all other retail store locations are under operating leases that will expire over the next 1 to 11 years.  Many of our leases include options to renew at our discretion.  We include the lease renewal option periods in the calculation of our operating lease assets and liabilities when it is reasonably certain that we will renew the lease. We also lease certain equipment under finance leases that expire generally within 60 months.

Subsequent to the petition date, we commenced negotiations with our landlords on substantially all of our ongoing leases, resulting in significant modifications and remeasurement during the current quarter, and which continues into our second quarter of fiscal 2021.  As a defendantresult of the remeasurements and terminations of rejected leases, we reduced our operating lease right-of-use assets by approximately $32 million and our operating lease liabilities by approximately $113 million, recording a gain of approximately $81 million, which is included in Reorganization items, net (see Note 2) in the unaudited interim Consolidated Statement of Operations.

12

We determine whether an agreement contains a lease at inception based on our right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the identified asset and the right to direct the use of the identified asset. Lease liabilities represent the present value of future lease payments and the right-of-use (ROU) assets represent our right to use the underlying assets for the respective lease terms.

The operating lease liability is measured as the present value of the unpaid lease payments and the ROU asset is derived from the calculation of the operating lease liability.  As our leases do not generally provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate to calculate the present value of lease payments.  The incremental borrowing rate represents an estimate of the interest rate that would be required to borrow over a similar term, on a collateralized basis in a purported class action lawsuit, Jerry Castillo v. Tuesday Morning Inc., which was filed on December 28, 2017similar economic environment.

Rent escalations occurring during the term of the leases are included in the United States District Court, Middle Districtcalculation of Florida.the future minimum lease payments and the rent expense related to these leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.  In addition to minimum lease payments, certain leases require payment of a proportionate share of real estate taxes and certain building operating expenses allocated on a percentage of sales in excess of a specified base.  These variable lease costs are not included in the measurement of the ROU asset or lease liability due to unpredictability of the payment amount and are recorded as lease expense in the period incurred.  The caseROU asset is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Actadjusted to account for previously recorded lease-related expenses such as deferred rent and includes allegations that the Company violated various wage and hour labor laws. Relief is sought on behalfother lease liabilities.

Our lease agreements do not contain residual value guarantees or significant restrictions or covenants other than those customary in such arrangements.

The components of current and former Company employees. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages, penalties and attorneys' feeslease cost are as follows (in thousands):

Total lease costs shown above excludes $4.8 million recorded for accelerated recognition of rent expense as a result of the alleged violations. We are investigating the underlying allegations and intendplanned abandonment due to vigorously defend our position. We cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, for the lawsuit.Phoenix distribution center closing plan.

4.The table below presents additional information related to the Company’s leases as of September 30, 2020:

Other information related to leases, including supplemental disclosures of cash flow information, is as follows (in thousands):

13

Maturities of lease liabilities were as follows as of September 30, 2020 (in thousands):

Current and non-current finance lease liabilities are recorded in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities – non-current,” respectively, on our consolidated balance sheet.  As of September 30, 2020, there were 0 operating lease payments for legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced.

7.     Earnings per common share — The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income/(loss)earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

For the quartersquarter ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,September 30, 2020, options representing the rights to purchase approximately 4.02.6 million weighted average shares and 3.8 million weighted average shares, respectively, were not includedexcluded in the dilutive incomeearnings per share calculation because the assumed exercise of such options would have been anti-dilutive.  For the six monthsquarter ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,September 30, 2019, all options and awards representing the rights to purchase shares were excluded fromin the diluted lossdilutive earnings per share calculation, as we had a net loss for the periods andbecause the assumed exercise of such options and awards would have been anti-dilutive.

5.      Revolving credit facility8.     Debt — We haveare party to a credit agreement providingwhich provided for an asset-based, five-year senior secured revolving credit facility in the original amount of up to $180.0 million which matureswas scheduled to mature on August 18, 2020January 29, 2024 (the “Revolving“Pre-Petition ABL Credit Facility”Agreement”). The availability of funds under the RevolvingPre-Petition ABL Credit Facility isAgreement was limited to the lesser of a calculated borrowing base and the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the RevolvingPre-Petition ABL Credit Facility.Agreement. Our indebtedness under the RevolvingPre-Petition ABL Credit FacilityAgreement is secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets. The Revolving

On May 14, 2020, we entered into a Limited Forbearance Agreement (the “Forbearance Agreement”) with the lenders under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Facility containsAgreement.

Under the terms of the Forbearance Agreement, the lenders under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement agreed to not exercise remedies under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement and applicable law through May 26, 2020 (or earlier, if certain restrictive covenants, which affect, among others,events occurred) based on the event of default resulting from our

7

ability to incur liens or incur additional indebtedness, change suspension of the natureoperation of our business sell assets or merge or consolidate with anyin the ordinary course and other entity, or make investments or acquisitions unless theyevents of default that may arise during the forbearance period as a result of failing to meet our obligations under certain requirements. The Revolving Credit Facility requires that we satisfy a fixed charge coverage ratio at any time that our availability is less thanagreements.

Pursuant to the greaterForbearance Agreement, the commitment of 10% of our calculated borrowing base or $12.5 million. Our Revolving Credit Facility may, in some instances, limit our ability to pay cash dividends and repurchase our common stock. In order for the borrowerlenders under the RevolvingPre-Petition ABL Credit Facility, our subsidiary,Agreement was permanently reduced from $180 million to make$130 million and new swingline loans were not advanced. During the forbearance period, the lenders were not obligated to fund further loans or issue or renew letters of credit under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.

14

The Forbearance Agreement required loan repayments of $10 million under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement, and the application of unrestricted and unencumbered cash balances in excess of $32 million to the repayment of outstanding borrowings under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement. The Forbearance Agreement also required daily cash sweeps to the Company’s main concentration account, a restricted paymentdeposit account control agreement over such account, the imposition of additional reporting obligations, including a business plan, cash flow forecasts and working capital plan, and adherence to us forsuch cash flow forecasts, subject to certain permitted variances. The Forbearance Agreement also required the paymentCompany to retain a liquidation consultant and financial advisor.  The Forbearance Agreement ended on May 26, 2020.

As of a dividend or a repurchase of shares,September 30, 2020, we must, among other things, maintain availability of 20%had $0.1 million outstanding under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.  The filing of the lesserChapter 11 Cases on May 27, 2020, was an event of our calculated borrowing base or our lenders’ aggregate commitmentsdefault under the RevolvingPre-Petition ABL Credit Facility on a pro forma basis for a specified period prior toAgreement, making all amounts outstanding under the existing Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement immediately due and immediately following the restricted payment.payable. As of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2020, all outstanding borrowings under the existing agreement are reflected as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  As discussed in Note 1, we believe that any efforts to enforce such payment obligations under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement were in compliance with allstayed as a result of the Revolvingfiling of the Chapter 11 Cases, and the creditors’ rights of enforcement with respect to the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Facility covenants.Agreement are subject to the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and any Bankruptcy Court orders modifying the stay, including the orders of the Bankruptcy Court approving the DIP ABL Facility.

The fair value of the Company’s debt approximated its carrying amount as of September 30, 2020.  

As 0 availability remains under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement, unused commitment fees and interest charges ceased.  

At December 31, 2017,September 30, 2019, we had no$57.9 million of borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, $8.5Pre-Petition ABL Agreement, $8.9 million of outstanding letters of credit and availability of $102.9$65.3 million. Letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility are primarilygenerally for self-insurance purposes. We incur commitment

DIP ABL Facility

On May 29, 2020, we entered into the DIP ABL Credit Agreement. The Lenders under the DIP ABL Facility are the existing lenders under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.

The DIP ABL Credit Agreement includes conditions precedent, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, and events of default customary for financings of this type and size. The DIP ABL Credit Agreement requires us to, among other things, maintain certain minimum liquidity requirements, and receive approval of a plan of reorganization or sale of substantially all our assets through the Chapter 11 process pursuant to certain agreed upon deadlines.  On September 8, 2020, the lenders under the DIP ABL Facility agreed to extend the deadline contained in the court order approving the DIP ABL Credit Agreement for filing a plan of reorganization or motion to sell substantially all of our assets to September 17, 2020.  On September 9, 2020, the committee for the unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases filed an objection with the Bankruptcy Court asserting the extension was not valid.  The Company believes the objection is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the objection.

Under the terms of the DIP ABL Credit Agreement, amounts available for advances are subject to a borrowing base generally consistent with the borrowing base under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement, subject to certain agreed upon exceptions. The DIP ABL Credit Agreement requires that all proceeds of advances under the DIP ABL Facility be used only for ordinary course general corporate and working capital purposes, costs of administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, certain professional fees and fees and expenses relating to the DIP ABL Facility, in each case, in accordance with a cash flow budget that will be updated periodically, subject to certain permitted variances. The DIP ABL Credit Agreement requires that all cash received by us (other than proceeds of the DIP ABL Facility) be applied to repay outstanding amounts under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.  As of September 30, 2020, we had 0 amounts outstanding under the DIP ABL Facility, $8.8 million of outstanding letters of credit and approximately $27.0 million of borrowing capacity available under the DIP ABL Facility.

The commitments of the lenders under the DIP ABL Facility terminate and outstanding borrowings under the DIP ABL Facility mature at the earliest of the date which is one hundred eighty (180) days after the Petition Date; the date of consummation of the sale of all or substantially all of our assets; the effective date of a plan of reorganization; or upon the occurrence of an event of default under the DIP ABL Credit Agreement or such other date as the outstanding borrowings under the DIP Facility are accelerated.

15

DIP Term Facility

On July 10, 2020, in accordance with a final order issued by the Bankruptcy Court on that date (the “Final Order”), we entered into the Senior Secured Super Priority Debtor-In-Possession Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreement (the “DIP DDTL Agreement”) with the Franchise Group, Inc., which provides for delayed draw term loans up to 0.25%an aggregate principal amount of $25 million (the “DIP Term Facility”).  Pursuant to the DIP DDTL Agreement, the Lender agreed to lend us up to an aggregate principal amount of $25 million in the form of delayed draw term loans. The DIP Term Facility is guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries and secured on a super priority basis by real estate assets owned by us (the “Real Estate Assets”), including our corporate headquarters and warehouse/distribution complex located in Dallas, Texas. The DIP Term Facility will mature on April 10, 2021, which maturity (unless accelerated subject to the unused portionterms set forth in the DIP DDTL Agreement) may be extended, subject to payment of an extension fee to the Lender, for an additional three months at our election. The DIP Term Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum based on 3-month LIBOR (with a 1.00% LIBOR floor), plus an interest rate margin of 5.0% (subject to further increase of 2.0% upon the occurrence of an event of default).

Under the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, payable quarterly. Any borrowingDIP DDTL Agreement, so long as the Final Order is unstayed and is in full force and effect, we will be entitled to make borrowings under the RevolvingDIP Term Facility in minimum increments of $2.5 million subject to the satisfaction of certain additional conditions, including absence of defaults under the DIP Term Facility, delivery of notices of borrowing and the accuracy of the representations and warranties of us in the DIP DDTL Agreement.

Pursuant to the DIP DDTL Agreement, proceeds of borrowings under the DIP Term Facility must be used by us to: (1) repay obligations of us under (a) the DIP ABL Credit Facility incurs interest at LIBOR orAgreement, and (b) the prime rate, plus an applicable margin, at our election (exceptPre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement; (2) fund general working capital; and (3) fund reasonable transaction costs and fees with respect to swing loans, which incur interest solely at the prime rate plusDIP Term Facility, to the extent permitted by the applicable margin), subjectorders of the Bankruptcy Court and the DIP ABL Credit Agreement.

The DIP Term Facility includes conditions precedent, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, and events of default customary for financings of this type and size. We will be obligated to a floorprepay amounts outstanding under the DIP Term Facility upon certain asset sales and casualty or condemnation events with respect to the Real Estate Assets.

As of one month LIBOR plus an applicable margin inSeptember 30, 2020, we had 0 amounts outstanding under the case of loans based on the prime rate.  DIP Term Facility.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the secondfirst quarter of the current fiscal year2021 from the RevolvingDIP ABL Credit Agreement and the DIP Term Facility of $0.5$2.8 million was comprised of the amortization of financing fees of $2.6 million and commitment fees of $0.2 million.  Interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2020 from the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement of $0.7 million was comprised of interest of $0.5 million, commitment fees of $0.1 million, interest expense of $0.3 million, and the amortization of financing fees of $0.1 million. Interest expense for the second quarter of the prior fiscal year from the Revolving Credit Facility of $0.4 million was comprised of commitment fees of $0.1 million, interest expense of $0.2 million and the amortization of financing fees of $0.1 million. Interest expense for the six months ended December 31, 2017 of $1.0 million was comprised of commitment fees of $0.2 million, interest expense of $0.6 million and the amortization of financing fees of $0.2 million. Interest expense for the six months ended December 31, 2016 of $0.7 million was comprised of commitment fees of $0.2 million, interest expense of $0.3 million and the amortization of financing fees of $0.2 million.  

6.      Depreciation

9.     Property and equipment, including depreciation — Accumulated depreciation of owned property and equipment and property at December 31, 2017as of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 20172020 was $147.9$201.0 million and $138.3$231.1 million, respectively. The decrease in the current quarter was due to the stores closed permanently during the quarter and the resulting property and equipment disposals. As of September 30, 2020, due to the ongoing impact of COVID-19, we performed an interim impairment assessment of our leasehold improvement assets, which included estimated future cash flow assumptions incorporating the impact of our temporary store closures.  As a result of this assessment, while two stores did present indicators of impairment, we determined that 0 additional store fixed asset impairment was required as the undiscounted projected future cash flows for each store sufficiently recovered the carrying value of the related asset group. Due to the uncertainty around COVID-19, our projected future cash flows may differ materially from actual results.  While we believe our estimates and judgments about projected future cash flows are reasonable, future impairment charges may be required if the future cash flows, as projected, do not occur, or if events change requiring us to revise our estimates.

As of September 30, 2020, we assessed the criteria for held for sale classification in light of the current environment and concluded that none met the criteria as of September 30, 2020.

7.10.     Income taxes — The—The Company or one1 of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, state and local taxing jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations for years throughprior to fiscal 2012.  The Internal Revenue Service has concluded2016 and are no longer subject to federal income tax examinations for years prior to fiscal 2013.

On March 27, 2020, in an examinationeffort to mitigate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Congress enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). The CARES Act includes certain corporate income tax provisions, which among other things, included a five-year carryback of net operating losses and acceleration of the corporate alternative minimum tax credit. The Company has evaluated the CARES Act and it is not expected to have a material impact on the income tax provision. The CARES Act also contains provisions for years ending on or before June 30, 2010.deferral of the employer portion of social security taxes incurred

16

through the end of calendar 2020 and an employee retention credit, a refundable payroll credit for 50% of wages and health benefits paid to employees not providing services due to the pandemic. As a result of the CARES Act, we continue to defer qualified payroll taxes and intend to claim the employee retention credit.

The effective tax ratesrate for the quartersquarter ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were (7.2%September 30, 2020 was (1.3%) and 3.6%, respectively.resulted in a tax benefit for the quarter.  The effective tax ratesrate for the six monthsquarter ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were 10.3% and (2.7%September 30, 2019 was (4.1%), respectively.resulting in tax expense for the prior year quarter.  A full valuation allowance is currently recorded against substantially all of the Company’s deferred tax assets. A deviation from the customary relationship between income tax expense/expense and (benefit) and pretax income/(loss) results from utilizationthe effects of the valuation allowance.

The Company’s results of operations included the estimated impact of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017.  Among numerous provisions included in the new law was the reduction of the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%.  The Company currently expects the effect of the tax law change to have a nominal impact on its annual effective tax rate, given its cumulative loss position and the related valuation allowance.  In the second fiscal quarter of 2018, the Company applied the provisions of the newly enacted TCJA, resulting in an approximate $0.5 million income tax benefit connected with future refunds of alternative minimum tax credits no longer requiring a valuation allowance. The impact of the new tax law, including the remeasurement of the Company’s deferred taxes at the new corporate tax rate, did not have a material impact on the Company’s deferred taxes as substantially all of the Company’s net deferred tax assets have corresponding valuation allowances. The future impact of TCJA may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, assumptions made, the issuance of additional guidance, and actions we may take as a result of the TCJA.

8.11.     Cash and cash equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents include credit card receivables and all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.  At December 31, 2017As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2017,2020, credit card receivables from third party consumer credit card providers were $7.7$2.2 million and $4.9$3.7 million, respectively.  Such receivables are generally collected within one week of the balance sheet date.

9.12.     Intellectual property — Our intellectual property primarily consists of indefinite lived trademarks. We evaluate annually whether the trademarks continue to have an indefinite life. Trademarks and other intellectual property are reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth fiscal quarter, and may be reviewed more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. As of December 31, 2017,September 30, 2020, the carrying value of the intellectual property, which included indefinite-lived trademarks, was $1.0$1.6 million, and no0 impairment was identified or recorded.

8

10.     Cease use liability13.     Subsequent events — Amounts in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities – non-current” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017 include the current and long-term portions, respectively, of accruals for the net present value of future minimum lease payments, net of estimated sublease income, attributable to closed stores with remaining lease obligations. The short-term and long-term cease use liabilities were $0.8 and $0.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017. The short-term and long-term cease use liabilities were $1.0 and $0.5 million, respectively, at June 30, 2017. Expenses related to store closings are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

11.    Sale-leaseback — DuringSale Leaseback

On October 30, 2020, the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, weCompany and certain subsidiaries entered into a sale-leaseback transactionpurchase and sale agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with Rialto Real Estate Fund IV – Property, LP (the “Purchaser”), pursuant to sell two buildingswhich the Purchaser agreed to purchase the Company’s Dallas headquarters and land utilized in our Dallas distribution center operations,warehouse facilities for an aggregate purchase price of $60 million.  Under the terms of Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company and certain subsidiaries and the Purchaser will enter into lease agreements under which we do not consider partthe Company will lease the headquarters and warehouse facilities following the close of our long-term distribution network,the sale under the Purchase and leased back theseSale Agreement.  The lease of the headquarters facility will be for a term of 10 years and the lease of the warehouse facilities through December 2017. We have since exercised ourwill be for an initial term of 2.5 years with an option to extend the relatedwarehouse facilities lease through March 2018. We have no continuing involvement with the properties sold other than a normal leaseback.                                                                                                                                  for one additional year.

The consideration received forclosing under the sale, as reduced by closingPurchase and transaction costs, was $8.8 million, andSale Agreement is subject to the net book value of properties sold was $5.2 million, resulting in a $3.6 million gain. The gain recognized in fiscal year 2016 was $2.5 million, which included the portionapproval of the gain in excessBankruptcy Court and other customary closing conditions.  Under the terms of the present valuePurchase and Sale Agreement, and subject to the satisfaction of all conditions to closing, the closing of the minimum lease payments fortransactions contemplated under the leaseback,Purchase and was includedSale Agreement shall occur the third business day following the issuance of an order by the Bankruptcy Court confirming the Company’s plan of reorganization, but in other income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.  During fiscal 2017, we recognized $0.7 million of the gain. During the first six months of fiscal 2018, we recognized the final $0.4 million of the gain with no remaining deferred gain as ofevent later than December 31, 2017.   The leaseback is an operating lease, and we will pay approximately $0.2 million in rent, excluding executory costs, from January 2018 through March 2018.2020.

12.  Capital Lease — During fiscal 2017, weABL Commitment Letter

On November 2, 2020, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a 5-year capital lease maturing on January 31, 2022 for equipmentcommitment letter (the “ABL Commitment Letter”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and software. At December 31, 2017,Bank of America, N.A. (collectively, the capital lease asset balance was $0.7 million, the current lease liability was $0.2 million and the long-term lease liability was $0.5 million. The capital lease asset is amortized on a straight-line basis. During the second fiscal quarter of 2018, the capital lease amortization was less than $0.1 million and was $0.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2017.  

13.  Recent accounting pronouncements — In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”“Commitment Parties”), which provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues in regard to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 should be adopted on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case the amendments should be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company currently expects to adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and is evaluating the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”) to reduce the complexity of certain aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions. ASU 2016-09 involves changes in several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for the income tax consequences of share-based awards. For public companies, ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur to determine the amount of share based compensation cost to recognize in each period, as permitted by ASU 2016-09. In addition, the adoption of this standard prospectively changes the dilutive earnings per share calculation by removing excess tax benefits and deficiencies from the computation. The adoption of this standard did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which is intended to improve financial reporting in connection with leasing transactions. ASU 2016-02 will require entities (“lessees”) that lease assets with lease terms of more than twelve months to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all leases, whether operating or finance, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for finance leases. Accounting by entities that own the assets leased by lessees (“lessors”) will remain largely unchanged from current GAAP. In addition, ASU 2016-02 requires disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public companies, ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective approach is required for all leases existing or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company currently expects to adopt this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. While the Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-02 to assess the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures, the primary effect of adopting the new standard will be to record assets and obligations for current operating leases.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”), which changes the measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to the lower of cost or net realizable value, except for companies using the Retail Inventory Method which will continue to use existing impairment models. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of

9

completion, disposal, and transportation. The new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), an updated standard on revenue recognition, and has since modified the standard with additional ASUs. The new guidance provides enhancements to the quality and consistency of how revenue is reported while also improving comparability in the financial statements of companies reporting using IFRS and GAAP. The core principle of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration, or payment,pursuant to which the company expectsCommitment Parties agreed to be entitledprovide, subject to certain conditions, a revolving credit facility in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015,an aggregate amount of $110 million (the “New ABL Facility”).  Pursuant to the FASB deferredABL Commitment Letter, the effective dateclosing of ASU 2014-09. Accordingly, this standardthe New ABL Facility is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017,subject to customary conditions precedent, including interim periods within that year, with early adoption permitted for interimexecution of definitive agreements, and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. is subject to entry of Bankruptcy Court approvals in form and substance acceptable to the Commitment Parties, including issuance of a confirmation order approving the Company’s plan of reorganization in form and substance acceptable to the Commitment Parties.

The Company currently expects to adopt this standardproposed terms of the New ABL Facility are set forth in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and does not expect this standardterm sheet attached to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures, as the vast majority of its revenueABL Commitment Letter. The New ABL Facility is expected to continueinclude conditions precedent, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, and events of default customary for financings of this type and size.  The New ABL Facility will require the Company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio if borrowing availability falls below certain minimum levels.

Under the proposed terms of the New ABL Facility, amounts available for advances would be subject to a borrowing base as described in the ABL Commitment Letter.  The closing of the New ABL Facility is subject to the Company having a minimum availability of $25 million as determined under the New ABL Facility at the time of closing.  Under the ABL Commitment Letter, borrowings under the New ABL Facility initially will bear interest at a rate equal to the adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread of 2.75% or the CB rate plus a spread of 1.75%.

17

The New ABL Facility would be secured by a first priority lien on all present and after-acquired tangible and intangible assets of the Company and its subsidiaries other than certain collateral that will secure bonds to be generated from point-of-sale transactions that are expectedissued to general unsecured creditors under the Amended Plan (as defined below).  The commitments of the lenders under the proposed New ABL Facility would terminate and outstanding borrowings under the New ABL Facility would mature on the third anniversary of the closing of the New ABL Facility.

Backstop Commitment Letter

On November 3, 2020, the Company entered into a Backstop Commitment Letter (the “Backstop Commitment Letter”) with Osmium Partners, LLC (the “Commitment Party”).  Pursuant to the proposed Amended Plan (as defined below), the Company has proposed to conduct a $40 million rights offering (the “Rights Offering”), under which eligible holders of the Company’s common stock would be recognized consistent with its current accounting.  In connection with its point-of-sale transactions, for which salesgranted share purchase rights to purchase up to $24 million of shares of the Company’s common stock, and the Commitment Parties would be granted share purchase rights to purchase up to $16 million of shares of the Company’s common stock.  Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Letter, the Commitment Party has agreed to purchase all unsubscribed shares in the Rights Offering (the “Backstop Commitment”).  The Backstop Commitment and the related Rights Offering are subject to a rightnumber of return, the Company currently expects to use one portfolio for its measurementconditions, including execution of a definitive backstop commitment agreement, approval of the estimated refund liabilityBankruptcy Court and return asset upon adoptioncertain other conditions set forth in the Backstop Commitment Letter.

As consideration for the Backstop Commitment, the Backstop Commitment Letter provides that the Commitment Party would receive a commitment fee equal to 5% of the new standard. Additionally,Backstop Commitment, payable in shares of the Company’s current accounting for gift card breakage is consistentcommon stock, and 10 million warrants to acquire additional shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 150% of the price in the Rights Offering.  In addition, the Backstop Commitment Letter provides that the Commitment Party would be entitled to appoint 3 members of the Company’s board of directors, with the new standard.  The Company is continuing to evaluate whether the new standard will affect its current accounting for customer incentives.  The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures and expects to use the modified retrospective method when adopting this standard.a maximum board size of 8 directors.

1018

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2020.

Business Overview