Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The number of shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of ~~January 31, 2018~~May 1, 2022, was ~~37,921,116.~~42,408,830.

The statements included in this Form 10-Q regarding future financial performance, results and conditions and other statements that are not historical facts, including, among others, the statements regarding competition, the Company’s intention to retain earnings for use in the Company’s business operations, the Company’s ability to continue to fund its operations and service its indebtedness, the adequacy of the Company’s accrual for tax liabilities, management’s projection of continued taxable income, and the Company’s ability to offset future income against net operating loss carryovers, constitute forward-looking statements. The words “can,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “plan,” “future,” “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results or events could differ materially from those set forth or implied by such forward-looking statements and related assumptions due to certain important factors, including, without limitation, the risks set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” below, which are incorporated herein by reference. Some, but not all, of the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q include, among other things, statements about the following:

The Company is also subject to general business risks, including results of tax audits, adverse state, federal or foreign legislation and regulation, changes in general economic ~~factors,~~conditions, the Company’s ability to retain and attract key employees, acts of war or global terrorism and unexpected natural disasters. Any forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to the Company as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

	December 31,			September 30,
	2017			2017			March 31,			September 30,
	(unaudited)						2022			2021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,027		$	5,630		$	2,638		$	2,276
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $987 ($830 at September 30, 2017)		55,540			49,457
Inventories, net		9,903			9,376
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $680 and $– on March 31, 2022 and September 30, 2021								42,383			57,660
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		8,045			5,783			6,901			8,852
Assets held for sale								13,891			—
Current assets of discontinued operations								20,620			20,608
Total current assets		75,515			70,246			86,433			89,396
Property and equipment, net		56,735			54,335			12,530			22,864
Goodwill		56,372			54,964
Operating lease right-of-use assets								17,327			29,048
Intangible assets, net		46,498			43,179			10,622			11,906
Collateral deposits, less current portion		694			879
Collateral deposits								487			487
Other assets		3,810			4,474			715			792
Deferred tax asset, net		7,800			11,052
Long-term assets of discontinued operations								58,488			60,160
Total assets	$	247,424		$	239,129		$	186,602		$	214,653
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	15,667		$	15,597		$	9,073		$	11,255
Accrued expenses		13,636			12,661			14,008			20,815
Liabilities related to assets held for sale								12,053			—
Income taxes payable		—			195			—			38
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		4,312			5,755			348			4,053
Current portion of term loan, net of deferred loan costs		8,196			11,848
Current portion of capital lease obligations		3,575			2,571
Current portion of workers’ compensation reserve		989			1,015
Term loans, net of deferred loan costs - current installments								2,637			2,692
Finance lease obligations - current installments								720			765
Operating lease obligations - current installments								3,044			4,722
Current portion of workers' compensation reserve								900			710
Other current liabilities		1,591			64			3,679			3,686
Current liabilities of discontinued operations								10,385			10,192
Total current liabilities		47,966			49,706			56,847			58,928
Line of credit, net of deferred loan costs		13,536			5,330			11,588			5,490
Term loan payable, less current portion, net of deferred loan costs		81,475			76,753
Term loans, less current portion, net of deferred loan costs								91,983			93,484
Deferred revenue, less current portion		2,675			3,111			—			369
Workers’ compensation reserve, less current portion		1,719			1,748
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		5,730			4,679
Workers' compensation reserve, less current portion								1,902			1,749
Finance lease obligations, less current installments								—			332
Operating lease obligations, less current installments								20,187			32,767
Deferred tax liabilities, net								768			852
Other non-current liabilities		1,923			2,049			2,640			6,265
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations								359			1,841
Total liabilities		155,024			143,376			186,274			202,077
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; total authorized – 5,000,000 shares; 1,000,000 shares authorized for Series A; 550,000 shares authorized for Series B; none issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized – 100,000,000 shares; 37,621,116 and 37,041,308 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, respectively		376			371
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized – 100,000 shares; 42,409 and 42,406 issued and outstanding on March 31, 2022 and September 30, 2021, respectively								424			424
Additional paid-in capital		278,438			276,478			288,415			288,355
Accumulated deficit		(186,414	)		(181,096	)		(288,511	)		(276,203	)
Total stockholders’ equity		92,400			95,753			328			12,576
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	247,424		$	239,129		$	186,602		$	214,653

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2022			2021			2022			2021
Net revenue	$	94,954		$	77,617		$	68,514		$	84,424		$	143,293		$	170,393
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		74,910			60,181			58,194			70,160			125,719			144,038
Selling, general, and administrative expense		19,538			14,383			14,004			14,353			30,599			27,723
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net		(207	)		8
Lease impairment								2,158			—			2,158			—
Loss on disposal of assets, net								—			—			26			—
Total operating expenses		94,241			74,572			74,356			84,513			158,502			171,761
Operating income		713			3,045
Other expense:
Operating loss								(5,842	)		(89	)		(15,209	)		(1,368	)
Other expense, net:
Interest expense, net		(2,660	)		(2,434	)		(2,593	)		(2,451	)		(5,298	)		(5,033	)
Total other expense		(2,660	)		(2,434	)
(Loss) income before income taxes		(1,947	)		611
Provision for income taxes		(3,371	)		(60	)
Net (loss) income	$	(5,318	)	$	551
Basic (loss) earnings per share of common stock	$	(0.14	)	$	0.02
Diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock	$	(0.14	)	$	0.02
Total other expense, net								(2,593	)		(2,451	)		(5,298	)		(5,033	)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes								(8,435	)		(2,540	)		(20,507	)		(6,401	)
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes								(46	)		(50	)		55			(174	)
Net loss from continuing operations								(8,481	)		(2,590	)		(20,452	)		(6,575	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes								5,565			2,475			8,144			4,373
Net loss							$	(2,916	)	$	(115	)	$	(12,308	)	$	(2,202	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–basic:
Continuing operations							$	(0.20	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations							$	0.13		$	0.06		$	0.19		$	0.10
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾							$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	(0.29	)	$	(0.05	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–diluted
Continuing operations							$	(0.20	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations							$	0.10		$	0.05		$	0.15		$	0.08
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾							$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	(0.29	)	$	(0.05	)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic		37,577			34,575			42,409			42,321			42,406			42,319
Diluted		37,577			35,712			54,691			54,458			54,681			54,363

	Six Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021
Operating activities
Net loss	$	(12,308	)	$	(2,202	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash (used for) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		6,139			6,339
Lease impairment		2,158
Interest expense and other bank fees accreted to term loans		—			1,121
Amortization of deferred loan costs		627			364
Stock-based compensation expense		113			85
Provision (reversal) for bad debts		680			(179	)
Loss on disposal of assets, net		26			—
Loss on sale of Carpets		—			761
Deferred income taxes		(84	)		21
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		14,597			304
Prepaid expenses, collateral deposits, and other current assets		1,830			1,023
ROU assets/ROU liabilities		(760	)		(298	)
Other assets		77			(1,236	)
Accounts payable		(2,154	)		(4,395	)
Accrued expenses		(6,314	)		1,589
Income tax payable		(38	)		5
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		(4,074	)		(2,819	)
Other current liabilities and other non-current liabilities		(3,289	)		2,913
Discontinued operations, net		2,674			7,726
Cash (used for) provided by operating activities		(100	)		11,122
Investing activities
Capital expenditures		(745	)		(2,655	)
Proceeds from sale of Carpets, net of transaction costs		—			438
Discontinued operations, net		(2,303	)		(1,487	)
Cash used for investing activities		(3,048	)		(3,704	)
Financing activities
Payments on term loans		(1,900	)		(4,101	)
Proceeds from (payments on) line of credit, net		6,098			(2,320	)
Deferred loan costs		(283	)		—
Payments on finance leases		(405	)		(1,194	)
Discontinued operations, net		—			(1,287	)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities		3,510			(8,902	)
Change in cash and cash equivalents		362			(1,484	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year		2,276			6,050
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year	$	2,638		$	4,566

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021			2022			2021
Common stock
Balance, beginning of period	$	424		$	423		$	424		$	423
Issuance of common stock upon cashless exercise of stock options		—			—			—			—
Balance, end of period	$	424		$	423		$	424		$	423
Additional paid in capital
Balance, beginning of period	$	288,399		$	288,210		$	288,355		$	288,193
Stock-based compensation expense - options		16			15			60			32
Balance, end of period	$	288,415		$	288,225		$	288,415		$	288,225
Accumulated deficit
Balance, beginning of period	$	(285,595	)	$	(273,647	)	$	(276,203	)	$	(271,560	)
Net loss		(2,916	)		(115	)		(12,308	)		(2,202	)
Balance, end of period	$	(288,511	)	$	(273,762	)	$	(288,511	)	$	(273,762	)
Total stockholders' equity	$	328		$	14,886		$	328		$	14,886

Three Months Ended December 31,

2017

2016

Operating activities

Net (loss) income

$
(5,318
)

$
551

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash (used for) provided by
operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization - cost of revenue

1,399

1,282

Depreciation and amortization - selling, general and administrative expense

3,434

2,679

Stock-based compensation expense

293

183

Provision for bad debts

156

—

Deferred income taxes

3,252

(226
)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net

(207
)

8

Amortization of deferred loan costs

307

251

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable, net

(6,240
)

(3,662
)
Inventories, net

979

1,320

Collateral deposits

184

1,300

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

(2,000
)

77

Other assets

664

(2,244
)
Accounts payable

69

3,759

Accrued expenses

1,064

1,858

Income tax payable

(195
)

184

Deferred revenue and customer deposits

(1,880
)

(166
)
Other current liabilities

501

(587
)
Other liabilities

(154
)

1,742

Cash (used for) provided by operating activities

(3,692
)

8,309

Investing activities

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

(9,000
)

—

Proceeds from sales of assets

343

97

Capital expenditures

(980
)

(4,042
)
Cash used for investing activities

(9,637
)

(3,945
)
Financing activities

Net proceeds on line of credit

8,162

—

Payments on term loan

(6,427
)

(4,482
)
Proceeds from term loan

7,500

—

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

1,500

—

Debt and common stock issuance costs

(332
)

—

Payments on financed insurance premiums

—

(290
)
Payments on capital leases

(677
)

(436
)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

9,726

(5,208
)
Change in cash and cash equivalents

(3,603
)

(844
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

5,630

5,279

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
2,027

$
4,435

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

Taxes

$
599

$
104

Interest

$
2,205

$
2,149

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

Capital equipment purchases financed with capital leases

$
2,734

$
—

Financed insurance premiums

$
—

$
866

ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. (including subsidiaries, referred to collectively ~~in this Report~~herein as ~~“ALJ,” the~~“ALJ” or “Company” ~~or “we”~~) is a holding company. ~~ALJ’s primary assets as of December~~During the three and six months ended March 31, ~~2017, were all of the outstanding capital stock~~2022, ALJ consisted of the following ~~companies:~~wholly-owned subsidiaries:

~~ALJ has organized its business and corporate structure along the following business segments: Faneuil, Carpets, and Phoenix. ALJ is reported as corporate overhead.~~Presentation below.

The ~~interim unaudited~~accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ALJ and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ~~generally accepted~~ in the United States ~~or U.S. GAAP,~~(“GAAP”) for interim financial information. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial information included herein is unaudited, and ~~with~~reflects all adjustments which are, in the ~~instructions to~~opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair statement of the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,~~results for the periods presented. Interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of financial results for a full year. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ~~and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements~~ should be read in conjunction with ALJ’s ~~audited financial statements and notes thereto~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~years~~fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2017 and 2016,~~2021, filed with the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC on December ~~19, 2017.~~20, 2021.

In February 2021, ALJ completed the sale of Carpets (the “Carpets Sale”). The Company determined that the Carpets Sale qualified as discontinued operations as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20-45, Presentation of Financial Statements — Discontinued Operations — Other Presentation Matters (“ASC 205”) because the Carpets Sale represented a strategic shift with a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. Pursuant to ASC 205, Carpets results of operations and cash flows were classified as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2021. See Note 4 for additional financial information about Carpets’ discontinued operations.

In February 2022, ALJ entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) to sell all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Phoenix (the “Phoenix Sale”) for cash consideration totaling approximately $136.4 million, subject to post-closing working capital adjustments. The Phoenix Sale closed on April 13, 2022. The Company expects to recognize a gain on sale of discontinued operations, before related income taxes, of approximately $45.0 million to $60.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2022.

The Company determined that the Phoenix Sale qualified as discontinued operations as defined by ASC 205 because the Phoenix Sale represented a strategic shift with a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. Pursuant to ASC 205, Phoenix assets, liabilities, results of operations, and cash flows were classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Interest

expense previously allocated to Phoenix does not qualify for classification within discontinued operations and has ~~made~~been reallocated to continuing operations. See Note 4 for additional financial information about Phoenix’s discontinued operations.

In December 2021, ALJ entered into an agreement to sell certain assets of Faneuil’s tolling and transportation vertical and health benefit exchange vertical (the “Faneuil Asset Sale”). The Faneuil Asset Sale closed on April 1, 2022, for cash consideration of $142.3 million less an indemnification escrow amount of approximately $15.0 million. Faneuil is also eligible to receive additional earn-out payments based upon the performance of certain customer agreements in an aggregate amount of up to $25.0 million. The Company expects to recognize a gain on sale of assets, before related income taxes, of approximately $110.0 million to $125.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2022.

Faneuil entered into a Transition Services Agreement ("TSA"), which is designed to ensure and facilitate an orderly transfer of the tolling and transportation vertical and health benefit exchange vertical. The services provided under the TSA will terminate at various times between 30 days and 365 days from the closing date of the Faneuil Asset Sale and can be renewed, in whole or in part, in 30-day increments, for a maximum of 180 days. Except for customary post-closing adjustments and transition services, Faneuil will have no continuing involvement in the disposed verticals subsequent to the completion of the sale.

The Company determined that the Faneuil Asset Sale does not qualify as discontinued operations as defined by ASC 205 because the Faneuil Asset Sale does not represent a strategic shift with a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. The associated assets and liabilities met the held-for-sale criteria as defined by ASC 360-10-45-9, Long-Lived Assets Classified as Held for Sale (“ASC 360”). As such, the associated assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale on March 31, 2022, and were valued at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and ~~judgments affecting~~assumptions that affect the reported amounts ~~reported in its condensed consolidated~~of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the ~~accompanying notes.~~reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Although actual results could differ materially from those estimates, such estimates are based on the best information available to management and management’s best judgments at the time. Significant estimates and assumptions by management are used for, but are not limited to, determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, including intangible assets acquired and allocation of acquisition purchase prices, estimated useful lives of certain assets, recoverability of long-lived and intangible assets, the recoverability of goodwill, the realizability of deferred tax assets, stock-based compensation, the likelihood of material loss as a result of loss contingencies, customer lives used for revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory reserves, and calculation of insurance reserves. The inputs into certain of these estimates and assumptions include the consideration of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Actual results may differ materially from estimates. ~~The interim financial information is unaudited but reflects all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in~~As the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly ALJ’s results of operations and financial position for the interim period. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2017, are not necessarily indicativeimpact of the ~~results expected~~COVID-19 pandemic continues to develop, many of these estimates could require increased judgment and carry a higher degree of variability and volatility, and may change materially in future periods.

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for ~~future quarters~~Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, to provide guidance on implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement (“CCA”) that is a service contract. ASU 2018-15 aligns the accounting for such costs with the guidance on capitalizing costs associated with developing or ~~the full year.~~

~~For~~obtaining internal-use software. Specifically, ASU 2018-15 amends ASC 350, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other, to include in its scope implementation costs of a ~~complete summary~~CCA that is a service contract and clarifies that a customer should apply ASC 350-40 to determine which implementation costs should be capitalized in such a CCA. ALJ adopted ASU 2018-15 on October 1, 2021. The impact of ASU 2018-15 on ALJ’s ~~significant accounting policies, please refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” included with ALJ’s audited~~consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2017. There were no material changes to significant accounting policies during the three months ended December 31, 2017. related disclosures was not material.

In ~~July 2015,~~August 2020, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”~~FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) ~~issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”~~and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) ~~2015-11, “Simplifying~~ to simplify accounting for certain financial instruments. ASU 2020-06 eliminates the ~~Measurement~~current models that require separation of ~~Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying~~beneficial conversion and cash conversion features from convertible instruments and simplifies the ~~Measurement~~derivative scope exception guidance pertaining to equity classification of ~~Inventory~~.”contracts in an entity’s own equity. The ~~amendments~~new standard also introduces additional disclosures for convertible debt and freestanding instruments that are indexed to and settled in an entity’s own equity. ASU ~~2015-11 require an entity~~2020-06 amends the diluted earnings per share guidance, including the requirement to ~~measure inventory at~~use the ~~lower of cost or net realizable value. The amendments do not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. The amendments apply to~~if-converted method for all ~~other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively.~~convertible instruments. ALJ adopted ASU ~~2015-11~~ 2020-06 on October 1, ~~2017.~~ 2021 using the full retrospective basis. The ~~standard did not have a significant~~ impact of ASU 2020-06 on ALJ’s consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements and related disclosures was not material.

Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options

In May ~~2014,~~2021, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~2021-04,~~” to supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle~~Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), which addresses issuer’s accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options. ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, it is possible more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than required under existing U.S. GAAP including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. Subsequently, the FASB has issued the following standards to provide additional clarification and implementation guidance for ASU 2014-09 including: (i) ASU 2016-08, “~~Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” (ii) ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” (iii) ASU 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,”~~ ~~and (iv) ASU~~ ~~2017-10,~~ ~~Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853): Determining the Customer of the Operation Services.~~

~~ASU 2014-09~~2021-04 will be effective for ALJ on October 1, ~~2019 as~~2022. ALJ ~~has determined that it will~~does not ~~adopt~~anticipate the adoption of ASU ~~2014-09 early. ASU 2014-09 allows for two methods of adoption: (a) “full retrospective” adoption, meaning the standard is applied~~2021-04 to all periods presented, or (b) “modified retrospective” adoption, meaning the cumulative effect of applying ASU 2014-09 is recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance in the year of adoption. ~~ALJ has not yet determined which method it will adopt.~~

~~As the new standard will supersede substantially all existing revenue guidance, it could~~significantly impact the timing of ALJ’s revenue and cost of revenue recognition across all business segments. ALJ has formed a project team and has engaged an outside revenue recognition consultant who has completed a revenue recognition adoption roadmap that includes three phases. Phase I is the identification, documentation, and preliminary analysis of how ALJ currently accounts for revenue transactions compared to the revenue accounting required under the new standard. Phase I is expected to be completed in early 2018. Phase II includes a more detailed analysis, including the development of revenue recognition models, data analysis, analyzing implementation options, and finalizing a transition method. Phase II is expected to be completed in mid-2018. Phase III includes identification of system requirements, changes to internal controls and business processes, and final implementation. Phase III is expected to be completed in mid-2019. Because of the nature of the work that remains, at this time we are unable to reasonably estimate the impact of adoption on ourits consolidated financial ~~statements. ALJ’s evaluation of the financial impact~~statements and related ~~disclosure of the new standard will likely extend over several future reporting periods.~~disclosures.

Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers

In ~~February 2016,~~October 2021, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-02, “Leases~~2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers.” The new guidance requires contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination to be recognized and measured by the acquirer on the acquisition date in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as if it had originated the contracts. This approach differs from the current requirement to measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination at fair value. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. Recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses will depend on classification as either a finance or operating lease. ~~ASU 2016-02 also requires certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The provisions of~~ ~~ASU 2016-02 should be applied on a modified retrospective basis. ASU 2016-02~~2021-08 will be effective for ALJ on October 1, ~~2020 as ALJ has determined that it~~2023. The adoption impact of the new standard will depend on the magnitude of future acquisitions. The standard will not ~~adopt ASU 2016-02 early. The adoption of~~ ~~ASU 2016-02 will result in a material increase~~impact acquired contract assets or liabilities from business combinations occurring prior to the ~~Company’s consolidated balance sheets for lease liabilities and right-of-use assets. The Company is currently evaluating the other effects the~~ adoption of ~~ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.~~date.

As a result of the Phoenix Sale described in Note 1, all revenue reported was attributable to Faneuil for all periods presented.

Revenue by contract type was as follows for the three and six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

The following table provides information about consolidated contract assets and contract liabilities at the end of each reporting period:

~~On October 2, 2017 (the “Purchase Date”), Phoenix acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities from~~ LSC Communications, Inc. (“LSC”) and Moore-Langen Printing Company, Inc. related to its printing and manufacturing services division in Terre Haute, Indiana. Such assets and liabilities are referred to hereinafter as the “Printing Components Business.” Total purchase price was $10.0 million in cash, subject to customary net working capital adjustments. Phoenix withheld $1.0 million from the consideration paid at closing, which ~~will be paid on October 2, 2018.~~

~~The Printing Components Business leverages Phoenix’s existing capabilities and core competencies, strengthens its position in the education markets, and expands revenue into new markets.~~

As part of the Printing Components Business acquisition, Phoenix and LSC entered into a supply agreement (the “Supply Agreement”). Pursuant to the Supply Agreement, LSC agreed to purchase from Phoenix its print requirements to continue servicing certain of its customers, buy minimum amounts of certain components from Phoenix, and provide Phoenix with a right of last refusal to supply certain non-component work.

Phoenix and ALJ financed the acquisition by borrowing $7.5 million under a term loan with Cerberus, selling an aggregate of $1.5 million of ALJ common stock in a private offering to two investors who are unaffiliated with ALJ, and using $1.0 million cash from the exercise of stock options by Jess Ravich, Executive Chairman of ALJ. ALJ amended its financing agreement with Cerberus to facilitate the term loan (Note 7).

~~The following schedule reflects the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the Purchase Date and the purchase price details (in thousands~~):

The ~~Company accounted for the Printing Components Business acquisition using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the~~following table provides changes in consolidated contract assets and contract liabilities ~~were recorded at their fair values at the date~~from September 30, 2021 to March 31, 2022:

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Printing Components Business recorded $4.5 million of net revenue. Because the Printing Components Business was closely aligned with Phoenix’s existing business, including the overlap of customers, its operations were immediately integrated into Phoenix’s operations, and financial metrics other than net revenue were not separately tracked.

Deferred revenue primarily consists of billings or payments received in advance of revenue recognition from call center services, including non-refundable payments made prior to operations. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when transfer of control to customers has occurred. Customers are typically invoiced for these agreements in regular installments and revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual service period. The deferred revenue balance is influenced by several factors, including seasonality, the compounding effects of renewals, invoice duration, invoice timing, size and new business linearity within the quarter. Deferred revenue does not represent the total contract value of annual or multi-year non-cancellable agreements.

Payment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within 30 to 60 days. In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. The primary purpose of invoicing terms is to provide customers with simplified and predictable ways of purchasing products and services, not to receive financing from customers. Any potential financing fees are considered de minimis.

Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations represents contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized, which includes deferred revenue. Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligation is influenced by several factors, including the timing of renewals and average contract terms. The Company applied practical expedients to exclude amounts related to performance obligations that are billed and recognized as they are delivered, optional purchases that do not represent material rights, and any estimated amounts of variable consideration that are subject to constraint in accordance with the new revenue standard.

The Company has elected to apply the optional exemption for the disclosure of remaining performance obligations for contracts that have an original expected duration of one year or less, are billed and recognized as services are delivered and/or variable consideration allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied promise to transfer a distinct good or service that forms part of a single performance obligation. This primarily consists of call center services that are billed monthly based on the services performed each month.

The Company recognizes an asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if it expects the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year. The costs to obtain a contract capitalized under the new revenue standard are primarily sales commissions paid to our sales force personnel. Capitalized costs may also include portions of fringe benefits and payroll taxes associated with compensation for incremental costs to acquire customer contracts and incentive payments to partners. These costs are amortized over the term of the contract or the estimated life of the customer relationship if renewals are expected and the renewal commission is not commensurate with the initial commission. The Company expenses sales commissions when incurred if the amortization period of the sales commission is one year or less. The accounting for incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer is consistent with the accounting under previous guidance.

The following table provides changes in costs to obtain a contract for the three and six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

The Company also capitalizes costs incurred to fulfill its contracts that (i) relate directly to the contract, (ii) are expected to generate resources that will be used to satisfy the Company’s performance obligation under the contract, and (iii) are expected to be recovered through revenue generated under the contract. Contract fulfillment costs are expensed to cost of revenue as the Company satisfies its performance obligations by transferring the service to the customer. These costs are amortized on a systematic basis over the expected period of benefit.

The following table provides changes in costs to fulfill a contract for the three and six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

Capitalized costs to obtain and fulfill a contract are periodically reviewed for impairment. ALJ did not incur any impairment losses during the three and six months ended March 31, 2022 or 2021.

As previously discussed in Note 1, ALJ sold Carpets during February 2021. As a result, ALJ recognized a loss on sale of $0.8 million

during the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017,~~2021 calculated as follows:

The carrying value of the ~~Company incurred approximately $123,000~~net assets sold, at the time of ~~acquisition-related costs in connection with the Printing Components Business acquisition, which~~closing, were ~~expensed to selling, general and administrative expense.~~as follows:

On May 26, 2017 (the “CMO Business Purchase Date”), Faneuil acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities associated with the customer management outsourcing business (“CMO Business”) of ~~Vertex Business Services LLC.~~ ALJ REGIONAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The CMO Business, which was purchased to expand Faneuil’s presence into the utilities market, provides direct customer care call center operations, back-office processes, including billing, collections and business analytics, and installation and cloud-based customer care support exclusively for the utilities industry.NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following ~~schedule reflects~~table presents information regarding certain components of loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, attributable to Carpets, for the ~~final fair value of assets acquired~~three and ~~liabilities assumed on the CMO Business Purchase Date and the purchase price details (in thousands~~):six months ended March 31, 2021:

The following ~~is a summary~~table presents significant components of ~~CMO Business revenue~~cash flows of discontinued operations, attributable to Carpets, for the six months ended March 31, 2021:

As previously discussed in Note 1, ALJ sold certain assets of Faneuil on April 1, 2022.

The following table presents the carrying amount of major classes of assets and ~~earnings~~liabilities classified as held for sale on March 31, 2022:

The following table presents the carrying amount of major classes of assets and liabilities, attributable to Phoenix, classified as held for sale included in ~~the Company’s consolidated statement~~discontinued operations on March 31, 2022 and September 30, 2021:

The following table presents results of operations reported as discontinued operations, attributable to Phoenix, for the three and six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017 (in thousands~~): 2022 and 2021:

The following table presents certain components of cash flows reported as discontinued operations, attributable to Phoenix, for the six months ended March 31, 2022:

The Company maintains its cash balances in accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any loss in such accounts and believes there is little exposure to any significant credit risk.

As a result of the Phoenix Sale described in Note 1, all revenue reported was attributable to Faneuil for all periods presented. The percentages of ALJ ~~did not have any customer with net revenue in excess of 10% of~~ consolidated ~~net revenue. Each of ALJ’s segments had customers that represent more than 10% of their respective net revenue, as described below.~~

~~Faneuil. The percentage of Faneuil~~ net revenue derived from its significant customers ~~was~~were as follows:

~~Trade receivables~~Accounts receivable from ~~these~~significant customers during either the three or six months ended March 31, 2022, totaled ~~$8.2~~$13.4 million on ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017.~~2022. As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, all Faneuil accounts receivable were unsecured. The risk with respect to accounts receivable is mitigated by credit evaluations performed on customers and the short duration of payment terms extended to customers.

Trade receivables from these customers totaled $3.1 million on December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, all Carpets accounts receivable were unsecured. The risk with respect to accounts receivable is mitigated by credit evaluations performed on customers and the short duration of payment terms extended to customers.

~~Phoenix. The percentage of Phoenix net revenue derived from its significant customers was as follows:~~

Trade receivables from these customers totaled $6.1 million on December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, all Phoenix accounts receivable were unsecured. The risk with respect to accounts receivable is mitigated by credit evaluations performed on customers and the short duration of payment terms extended to customers.

ALJ did not have any suppliers that represented more than 10% of consolidated inventory purchases. However, two of ALJ’s segments had suppliers that represented more than 10% of their respective inventory purchases, as described below.

~~Carpets. The percentage of Carpets inventory purchases from its significant suppliers was as follows:~~

~~If these suppliers were unable to provide materials on a timely basis, Carpets management believes alternative suppliers could provide the required materials with minimal disruption to the business.~~

~~Phoenix. The percentage of Phoenix inventory purchases from its significant suppliers was as follows:~~

~~If these suppliers were unable to provide materials on a timely basis, Phoenix management believes alternative suppliers could provide the required supplies with minimal disruption to the business.~~

The following table summarizes accounts receivable at the end of each reporting ~~period (in thousands~~):period:

~~The following table summarizes inventories at the end of each reporting period (in thousands~~):

The following table summarizes property and equipment at the end of each reporting ~~period (in thousands~~):period:

Property and equipment depreciation and amortization expense, including amounts related to ~~capitalized~~finance leased assets, was ~~$3,452,000~~ $2.7 million

and ~~$2,953,000~~$2.4 million for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016,~~2021, respectively, and $4.9 million and $4.8 million for the six

~~The following table summarizes goodwill by reportable segment at the end of each reporting period (in thousands~~):

The following ~~table summarizes~~tables summarize identified intangible assets at the end of each reporting ~~period (in thousands~~):period:

	December 31, 2017							September 30, 2017										March 31, 2022
	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
(in thousands)															Weighted Average Original Life (Years)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships	$	34,400	$	(8,167	)	$	26,233	$	34,400	$	(7,446	)	$	26,954	12.0		5.2	$	16,550	$	(10,602	)	$	5,948
Trade names		10,760		(1,250	)		9,510		10,760		(1,143	)		9,617	27.6		21.9		1,500		(845	)		655
Supply agreements/Contract Backlog		10,358		(777	)		9,581		5,658		(420	)		5,238
Supply agreements															11.9		8.8		2,910		(2,009	)		901
Technology															8.0		5.6		3,400		(1,133	)		2,267
Non-compete agreements		3,030		(2,030	)		1,000		3,030		(1,858	)		1,172	6.6		3.9		1,550		(699	)		851
Internal software		580		(406	)		174		580		(382	)		198
Totals	$	59,128	$	(12,630	)	$	46,498	$	54,428	$	(11,249	)	$	43,179				$	25,910	$	(15,288	)	$	10,622

~~Intangible asset amortization expense was $1,381,000 and $1,008,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.~~

Intangible asset amortization expense was $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $1.3 million and $1.5 million for the six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The following table presents expected future amortization expense ~~for the~~ ~~remainder~~as of ~~fiscal 2018 and yearly thereafter (in thousands~~):March 31, 2022:

~~The following table summarizes ALJ’s line of credit, and current and noncurrent term loan payables at the end of each reporting period (in thousands~~):

The following table summarizes accrued expenses at the end of each reporting ~~period (in thousands~~):period:

The Company is self-insured for certain workers’ compensation claims as discussed below. The current portion of workers’ compensation reserve is disclosed with accrued expenses. The non-current portion of workers’ compensation reserve is disclosed with other non-current liabilities.

Faneuil. Faneuil is self-insured for workers’ compensation claims up to $500,000 per incident. Reserves have been provided for workers’ compensation based upon insurance coverages, third-party actuarial analysis, and management’s judgment.

~~Faneuil~~. Faneuil is self-insured for workers’ compensation claims up to $500,000 per incident, and maintains insurance coverage for costs above the specified limit. Faneuil is self-insured for health insurance claims up to $150,000 per incident, and maintains insurance coverage for costs above the specified limit. Reserves have been provided for workers’ compensation and health claims based upon insurance coverages, third-party actuarial analysis, and management’s judgment.

~~Carpets. Carpets maintains outside insurance to cover workers’ compensation claims.~~

~~Phoenix.~~ Before the acquisition of Phoenix by ALJ, Phoenix was self-insured for workers’ compensation under their parent company for claims up to $500,000 per incident, and maintains coverage for costs above the specified limit. After the acquisition, Phoenix changed to a fully insured plan.

~~ALJ computed~~The following table summarizes basic and diluted ~~(loss) earnings per common share for each period as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts~~):

~~ALJ computed basic earnings~~loss per share of common stock using net (loss) income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. ALJ computed diluted earnings per share of common stock using net (loss) income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus potentially dilutive shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase common stock were determined by applying the treasury stock method to the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options.for each period presented:

Stock options to purchase 1,914,000 shares of common stock were not considered in calculating ALJ’s diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended December 31, 2017 as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2022			2021			2022			2021
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(8,481	)	$	(2,590	)	$	(20,452	)	$	(6,575	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		5,565			2,475			8,144			4,373
Net loss	$	(2,916	)	$	(115	)	$	(12,308	)	$	(2,202	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–basic:
Continuing operations	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.13		$	0.06		$	0.19		$	0.10
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾	$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	(0.29	)	$	(0.05	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.48	)	$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.10		$	0.05		$	0.15		$	0.08
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾	$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	(0.29	)	$	(0.05	)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic		42,409			42,321			42,406			42,319
Convertible debt		11,158			11,158			11,158			11,158
Warrants		1,095			962			1,089			873
Employee stock option grants		29			17			28			13
Diluted		54,691			54,458			54,681			54,363
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from diluted net income (loss) per share calculation:
Employee stock option grants		1,310			1,420			1,310			1,420
Warrants		-			1,297			-			1,297
Total		1,310			2,717			1,310			2,717

ALJ’s components of debt and the respective interest rate at the end of each reporting period were as follows:

	March 31, 2022						September 30, 2021
(in thousands)	Interest Rate			Balance			Interest Rate			Balance
Line of credit:
PNC Revolver		5.25	%	$	11,588			5.25	%	$	5,490
PNC Revolver LIBOR		4.00			—			4.00			—
Line of credit, net of deferred loan costs				$	11,588					$	5,490
Current portion of term loans:
Current portion of Blue Torch Term Loan		8.50		$	3,800			8.50		$	3,800
Less: deferred loan costs					(1,163	)					(1,108	)
Current portion of term loans, net of deferred loan costs				$	2,637					$	2,692
Term loans, less current portion:
Blue Torch Term Loan, less current portion		8.50		$	88,350			8.50		$	90,250
Convertible Promissory Notes		8.25			6,026			8.25			6,026
Less: deferred loan costs					(2,393	)					(2,792	)
Term loans, less current portion, net of deferred loan costs				$	91,983					$	93,484

Total line of credit and term loans				$	106,208					$	101,666

On April 1, 2022, in connection with the Faneuil Asset Sale (see Note 1), the Company repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all commitments and obligations under that certain Financing Agreement, dated June 29, 2021 (the “Blue Torch Term Loan”). ALJ’s payment to Blue Torch was approximately $92.2 million, which satisfied all of the Company’s debt obligations under the Blue Torch Term Loan (“Blue Torch Payoff”). The Company was not required to pay any prepayment premiums as a result of the repayment of indebtedness under the Blue Torch Term Loan, which provided that the mandatory prepayment made in connection with the proceeds from the Faneuil Asset Sale were exempt from such pre-payment premiums. In connection with the repayment of outstanding indebtedness by the Company, the lenders automatically and ~~Line~~permanently released all security interests, mortgages, liens and encumbrances under the Blue Torch Term Loan.

In August 2015, ALJ entered into a financing agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC (“Cerberus”), to borrow $105.0 million in a term loan (“Cerberus Term Loan”) and have available up to $30.0 million in a revolving loan (“Cerberus/PNC Revolver,” and togetherconnection with the ~~Cerberus Term Loan,~~Phoenix Sale on April 13, 2022, the ~~“Cerberus Debt”~~Company repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all commitments and obligations under that Amended and Restated Financing Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2021 (as amended, the “PNC Revolver”). The Company was required to pay a pre-payment premium of $0.3 million as a result of the repayment of indebtedness under the PNC Revolver. In connection with the repayment of outstanding indebtedness by the Company, the lenders automatically and permanently released all security interests, mortgages, liens and encumbrances under the PNC Revolver.

During the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2022, ALJ ~~has subsequently entered into three amendments~~expects to book a loss on debt extinguishment in the range of $3.0 million to $5.0 million, mostly attributable to the ~~Financing Agreement. The Financing Agreement and three amendments are summarized below (in thousands~~):write-off of deferred loan costs.

The Blue Torch Payoff and termination of the PNC Revolver do not impact the financial statement presentation, footnotes, and related disclosure of ALJ as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

~~Interest payments are due~~In June 2021, ALJ issued convertible promissory notes in ~~arrears on~~an aggregate principal amount of $6.0 million (the “Convertible Promissory Notes”) to two investors, including ALJ’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the ~~first day~~Board, Jess Ravich.

The Convertible Promissory Notes accrue interest at the rate of ~~each month.~~ ~~Quarterly principal payments are due~~8.25% per year, compounded monthly with interest payable in cash quarterly in arrears on the last day of each ~~fiscal quarter. Annual~~calendar quarter on the outstanding principal ~~payments~~balance until such principal amount is paid in full or until conversion. The principal and accrued interest owed under the Convertible Promissory Notes are convertible, at the option of the holders, into shares of the Company’s common stock, at any time prior to November 28, 2023, at a conversion price equal to ~~75%~~the quotient of ~~ALJ’s excess cash flow (“ECF”), as defined in~~all amounts due under each Convertible Promissory Note divided by the ~~Financing Agreement, are due upon delivery~~conversion rate of $0.54 per common share.

The Convertible Promissory Notes (i) were subordinate to the Blue Torch Term Loan and the PNC Revolver until the Blue Torch Payoff and the termination of the audited financial statements. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, ALJ made an ECF payment of $4.1 million. A final balloon payment is due at maturity, August 14, 2020. There is a prepayment penalty equalPNC Revolver, (ii) are unsecured, and (iii) mature on November 28, 2023, subject to ~~1% if the Cerberus Term Loan is repaid prior to August 2018. ALJ may make payments of up to $7.0 million against the loan with no penalty.~~extension under certain circumstances.

The Cerberus Debt is secured by substantially all the Company’s assets and imposes certain limitations on the Company, including its ability to incur debt, grant liens, initiate certain investments, declare dividends and dispose of assets. The Cerberus Debt also requires ALJ to comply with certain debt covenants. As of December 31, 2017, ALJ was in compliance with all debt covenants and had unused borrowing capacity of $10.8 million.

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, in connection with the Third Amendment, ALJ paid legal and other fees totaling $0.3 million, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

As ~~part~~a result of the ~~Second Amendment, ALJ paid Cerberus an amendment fee. Additionally, as part of the Second Amendment,~~Blue Torch Payoff and PNC Revolver termination, ALJ is ~~required~~no longer subject to ~~pay a fee in each~~financial covenant requirements.

Estimated future minimum principal payments, subsequent to the Blue Torch Payoff and termination of the PNC Revolver, are as follows (in thousands):

Faneuil and Phoenix lease equipment under non-cancelable capital leases. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum payments under non-cancelable capital leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more are as follows (~~in thousands~~):

~~The Company leases real estate, equipment, and vehicles under noncancellable operating leases. As of December 31, 2017, future minimum rental commitments under noncancellable leases were as follows (in thousands~~):

ALJ maintains employment agreements with certain key executive officers that provide for a base salary and an annual bonus, with annual bonus amounts to be determined by the Board of ~~Directors.~~Directors, or committee thereof, or the Chief Executive Officer. The agreements also provide for involuntary termination payments, which ~~includes~~include base salary, ~~and~~ performance bonus, medical premiums, stock options, non-competition provisions, and other terms and conditions of employment. ~~As of December~~On March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, contingent termination payments related to base salary and medical premiums totaled ~~$1.3~~$1.1 million. On April 1, 2022, contingent termination payments related to base salary and medical premiums were reduced to $0.5 million as a result of the Faneuil Asset Sale.

As part of Faneuil’s normal course of operations, certain customers require surety bonds guaranteeing the performance of a contract. ~~As of December 31, 2017,~~Subsequent to the Faneuil Asset Sale, the face value of such surety bonds, which represents the maximum cash payments that Faneuil’s surety would be obligated to pay under certain circumstances of non-performance, was ~~$29.1 million.~~$0.5 million, a decrease from $41.8 million on March 31, 2022. To date, ~~Faneuil’s surety~~Faneuil has not made any non-performance ~~payments.~~payments to any of its sureties.

The Company had letters of credit totaling $3.5 million outstanding on March 31, 2022, which were collateralized by a borrowing sublimit on the PNC Revolver. Subsequent to the termination of the PNC Revolver, the letters of credit were collateralized by restricted cash.

Faneuil filed a complaint against 3M Company on September 22, 2016, in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia. The dispute arises out of a subcontract entered into between 3M and Faneuil in relation to a toll road project in Portsmouth, Virginia. Under the terms of the subcontract, Faneuil provides certain services to 3M as part of 3M’s agreement to provide services to Elizabeth River Crossing (“ERC”). After multiple attempts to resolve a dispute over unpaid invoices failed, Faneuil determined to file suit against 3M to collect on its outstanding receivables. In its complaint, Faneuil seeks recovery of $5.1 million based on three causes of action: breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.

On October 14, 2016, 3M filed its answer and counterclaim against Faneuil. In its counterclaim, 3M seeks recovery in excess of $10.0 million based on three claims: breach of contract/indemnification, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment. 3M’s counterclaim alleges it incurred approximately $3.2 million in damages payable to ERC as a result of Faneuil’s conduct and seeks indemnification of an additional $10.0 million in damages incurred as a result of continued performance under its contract with ERC. A five-day bench trial is set for April 2018. A pretrial scheduling order has been entered and the parties are engaged in substantive discovery at this time.

Subsequent to filing suit against 3M, Faneuil entered into an agreement with ERC whereby ERC would become responsible for paying Faneuil directly for all services rendered from April 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. That agreement resulted in a payment from ERC to Faneuil on December 8, 2016, which resolved a portion of the $5.1 million claim against 3M.

During June 2017, ERC transitioned the services that were provided by Faneuil to an internal customer service operation. As a result of this transition, Faneuil no longer provides services to 3M or ERC. ERC continues to reimburse Faneuil for immaterial transition costs incurred by Faneuil.

Faneuil believes the facts support its claims that the disputed services should be paid and that 3M’s counterclaims are without merit. Faneuil intends to vigorously prosecute its claims against 3M and to defend against 3M’s counterclaims. Although litigation is inherently unpredictable, Faneuil remains confident in its ability to collect all of its outstanding receivables from 3M.

Tammy McNeil, a former Faneuil call center employee, filed a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action case against Faneuil in federal court in Newport News, Virginia in 2015. The class action asserted various timekeeping and overtime violations, which Faneuil denied. On June 6, 2017, the case was settled by the parties as part of a court-ordered mediation, for $0.3 million in damages, plus plaintiff’s attorney fees. Because the parties could not agree on the dollar amount of plaintiff’s attorney fees, both parties agreed to allow the court to determine the amount. On November 8, 2017, Faneuil received the court’s recommendation, which awarded a total of $0.7 million for plaintiff’s attorney fees and court fees. Faneuil has objected to a portion of the recommendation and has requested that the district court judge further reduce the award.

On July 31, 2017, plaintiff Donna Marshall (“Marshall”), filed a proposed class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento against Faneuil and ALJ. Marshall, a previously terminated Faneuil employee, alleges various California state law employment-related claims against Faneuil. Faneuil has answered the complaint and removed the matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; however, Marshall ~~has recently~~ filed a motion to remand the case back to state ~~court. The case is in~~court, which has been granted. In connection with the above, an ~~early stage~~amended complaint was filed by certain plaintiffs to add a claim for penalties under the California Private Attorneys General Act (the “PAGA Claim”). Faneuil demurred to the PAGA Claim and it was eventually dismissed by the trial court.

A mediation was held on March 11, 2021 and the parties ~~have not begun substantive discovery at this time.~~are negotiating a settlement. The parties are negotiating a settlement agreement for approval by the court.

Lois Harris, an employee of Faneuil in Georgia, filed a collective action ~~is without merit~~complaint on April 18, 2021 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Harris alleges, on behalf of herself and ~~intends~~other current and former non-exempt Call Center Agent employees who received nondiscretionary bonuses for periods in which they worked overtime hours, that Faneuil violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to include nondiscretionary bonuses in the regular rate of pay when calculating the overtime rate for Harris and other similarly-situated persons. Faneuil has engaged counsel to defend it ~~vigorously.~~in this action. The Company does not believe

~~Thornton~~the resolution of this complaint will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On ~~September 21, 2016, Plaintiffs Clifford Thornton and Tracey Thornton~~April 26, 2022, a putative class action complaint was filed ~~a complaint~~against Faneuil in the ~~Nevada~~United States District Court for ~~Clark County against ALJ, Carpets, Steve Chesin, and Jess Ravich.~~the Eastern District of Virginia. The complaint ~~includes~~asserts claims against Faneuil for ~~(1) fraud, (2) bad faith, (3) civil conspiracy, (4)~~negligence, breach of an implied contract, and unjust enrichment ~~(5) wrongful termination, (6) intentional infliction~~in connection with an alleged data breach. The proposed class includes certain former employees of ~~emotional distress, (7) negligent infliction~~Faneuil who contend their personal identifiable information was compromised in the data breach. The complaint seeks damages in excess of ~~emotional distress, and (8) loss~~$5.0 million on behalf of ~~marital consortium. On November 1, 2016,~~ the ~~defendants filed an answer to the complaint generally denying all claims. The parties are~~putative class. Faneuil has engaged in substantive discovery at this time, with the close of discovery scheduled for May 25, 2018 and all substantive dispositive motions due June 25, 2018. ALJ and Carpets believe this action is without merit and intendcounsel to defend it ~~vigorously.~~

In connection with its pending litigation matters (including the matters described above), management has estimated the range of possible loss, including fees and expenses, to be between $1.6 million and $2.4 million; however, as management has determined that no one estimate within the range is better than another, it has accrued $1.6 million as of December 31, 2017.in this action.

~~We and our subsidiaries~~ ~~have~~ The Company has been named in, and from time to time may become named in, various other lawsuits or threatened actions that are incidental to ~~our~~its ordinary business. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Any claims against ~~us,~~the Company, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming, cause usthe Company to incur costs and expenses, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. The results of these lawsuits and actions cannot be predicted with certainty. WeThe Company concluded as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022, that the ultimate resolution of these matters (including the matters described above) will not have a material adverse effect on ~~our~~ ~~business,~~the Company’s business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ALJ has operating leases for facilities, equipment, and vehicles, and finance leases for equipment. Over 95% of operating leases are for facilities. Many of the ~~Three Months Ended December 31, 2017~~Company’s facilities leases contain renewal options and rent escalation clauses. The Company subleases excess facility space.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception and recognizes a finance or operating lease liability and right-of-use asset in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for both operating and finance leases are recognized based on present value of lease payments over the lease term at commencement date.

In instances where the lease does not provide an implicit rate, the Company estimates an incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) based on the information available at commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments. ALJ does not have a published credit rating because it has no publicly traded debt. However, the Company does have several privately held debt instruments that were taken into consideration. The Company generates its IBR, using a synthetic credit rating model that estimates the likelihood (probability) of a borrower receiving a given credit rating based on relevant credit factors or predictor variables. It is based on a regression analysis using selected financial ratios of publicly traded industry comparable companies and the companies’ credit ratings. The estimated IBR is then adjusted for (i) the length of the lease term, and (ii) the effect of designating specific collateral with a value equal to the unpaid lease payments. Finally, ALJ applies the estimated IBR on a lease-by-lease basis as each lease has different start and end dates and has different assumptions regarding purchase or renewal options.

For facilities leases, ALJ accounts for non-lease components such as maintenance, taxes, and insurance, separately. For equipment leases, ALJ accounts for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component. The difference between the operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities primarily relates to adjustments for deferred rent and tenant improvement allowances.

The Company tests right-of-use (“ROU”) assets when impairment indicators are present. During the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017 consisted of~~2022, the ~~following:~~

~~Common Stock Activity during~~underlying ROU asset. The Company performed a discounted cash flow analysis on the ~~Three Months Ended December 31, 2016~~

ROU asset and determined that the net carrying value exceeded the estimated discounted future cash flows. As a result, ALJ ~~did not have any common stock activity~~recorded a $2.2 million lease impairment during the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016.~~2022.

~~ALJ’s equity incentive plans are broad-based, long-term programs intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests.~~

The following table presents the location of the ROU assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and ALJ’s weighted-average lease term and discount rate:

The following table presents the components of lease cost and the location of such cost in ALJ’s Consolidated Statements of Operations:

		Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	Statement of Operations Location	2022		2021		2022		2021
Finance Leases:
Amortization of finance lease assets	Selling, general, and administrative expense	$	39	$	195	$	260	$	507
Interest on finance lease liabilities	Interest expense		13		18		28		51
Total finance lease cost			52		213		288		558
Operating Leases:
Operating lease cost	Selling, general, and administrative expense		1,510		1,726		3,168		3,483
Operating lease cost	Cost of revenue		255		319		510		638
Variable lease cost	Selling, general, and administrative expense		25		277		380		499
Short-term lease cost	Selling, general, and administrative expense		—		9		—		19
Total operating lease cost			1,790		2,331		4,058		4,639
Sublease income	Selling, general, and administrative expense
Lease impairment	Lease impairment		2,158		—		2,158		—
Total lease cost, net		$	4,000	$	2,544	$	6,504	$	5,197

The following table presents supplemental cash flow information related to leases:

Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):

ALJ issued less than 0.1 million shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of stock options during both the six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.

In August 2018, ALJ shareholders approved the amendment and restatement of ALJ’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the preferred stock and authorize the issuance of 5.0 million shares of blank check preferred stock. ALJ had 0 preferred stock outstanding on March 31, 2022 or September 30, 2021.

In July 2016, ALJ shareholders approved ALJ’s Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (“2016 Plan”), which allows ALJ and its subsidiaries to grant securities of ALJ to officers, employees, directors, or consultants. ALJ believes that equity-based compensation is fundamental to attracting, motivating, and retaining highly qualified dedicated employees who have the skills and experience required to achieve business goals. Further, ALJ believes the 2016 Plan aligns the compensation of directors, officers, and employees with shareholder interest.

The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense included in ~~ALJ’s~~selling, general, and administrative expense on the Statements of ~~Operations (in thousands~~):Operations:

~~At December~~On March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, ALJ had ~~approximately $1.0~~$0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately ~~2.1~~2.5 years.

ALJ issued 200,000 options during the six months ended March 31, 2022. The fair value of the options was $0.1 million using the following assumptions: expected option life of 6.2 years, volatility of 56.46%, dividend yield of 0.00%, and annual risk-free interest rate of 1.18%.

Common Stock Awards. Members of ALJ’s Board of Directors receive a director compensation package that includes an annual common stock award. In connection with such awards, ALJ ~~granted an option~~recorded stock-based compensation expense of less than $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, and $0.1 million for both the six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.

On March 31, 2022, ALJ had 1.4 million stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $3.48 outstanding and warrants exercisable to purchase ~~10,000~~1.6 million shares of ~~ALJ~~ common stock with a total estimated fair value of approximately $15,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2017. ALJ estimated the fair value of the option on the grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model under the following assumptions: weighted average ~~expected option life~~exercise price of 6.0 years, weighted average expected volatility of 48.4%, expected dividend yield of 0%, and weighted average risk free interest rate of 2.1%. ALJ had no stock option awards during the three months ended December 31, 2016.$0.56 outstanding.

The “intrinsic value” of options is the excess of the value of ALJ stock over the exercise price of such options. The total intrinsic value of options outstanding (of which all are vested or expected to vest) and the total intrinsic value of options exercisable was ~~approximately $1.0~~$0.2 million ~~at December~~on March 31, ~~2017.~~

~~Members of ALJ’s Board of Directors receive a~~ ~~director compensation package that includes an annual common stock award. In connection with such awards, ALJ recorded stock-based compensation expense of~~ ~~$102,000 and $85,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.~~2022.

~~On December 22, 2017,~~ALJ recorded a benefit from income taxes for continuing operations of $0.1 million and a provision for income taxes of $0.2 million for the ~~President of the United States signed~~six months ended March 31, 2022 and ~~enacted into law H.R. 1 (the “Tax Reform Law”). The Tax Reform Law,~~2021, respectively. ALJ’s effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, except for certain provisions, resulted in significant changes to existing United States tax law, including various provisions that will impact ALJ. Below is a summary of the provisions of the Tax Reform Law that management believes will be most impactful to ALJ.

~~Federal Corporate Tax Rate Reduction.~~ ~~The Tax Reform Law reduces the federal corporate~~ tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Pursuant to Section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), ALJ will apply a blended corporate tax rate of 28.1%, which is based on the applicable tax rates before and after the Tax Reform Law and the number of days in ALJ’s initial tax year under the Tax Reform Law, which ends June 30, 2018. Subsequent to June 30, 2018, the federal tax rate will be 21%.

~~Interest Expense Limitation.~~ ~~The Tax Reform Law disallows the deduction for interest expense in excess of 30% of “adjusted taxable income” as defined by the IRC.~~

~~Bonus Depreciation. The Tax Reform Law allows~~continuing operations for the immediate deduction of 100% of eligible property placed in-service after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023. For certain property with longer production periods, the 100% bonus depreciation is extended through December 31, 2023.

~~Pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740-10, “Income Taxes,” ALJ recognized the effect of the Tax Reform Law on deferred tax assets and liabilities during the three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017. As~~2022 was 0.3%, as a result of generating state taxable income, offset by changes to the ~~enacted reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate, ALJ~~valuation allowance recorded ~~a one-time, non-cash increase to deferred income tax expense of $4.1 million to revalue ALJ’s~~against net deferred tax ~~asset. The resulting $4.1 million decrease~~assets. ALJ’s effective tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2021 was (3.0%), which was also due to ~~ALJ’s~~generating state taxable income, offset by changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax ~~asset was reasonably estimated, and based on the tax rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. ALJ will continue to analyze the provisions~~assets. The

increase in ALJ’s effective tax rate was attributable to an increase in forecasted operating losses, as well as changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets.

ALJ recorded a provision for income taxes for discontinued operations of $0.2 million for both the six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.

Although Faneuil quickly and actively managed the Security Event, such event caused disruption to parts of Faneuil’s business, including certain aspects of its provision of call center services. Faneuil carries insurance, including cyber insurance, commensurate with the size and the nature of its operations. Although Faneuil actively communicated with customers and worked to minimize disruption, Faneuil cannot guarantee that customer relationships were not harmed as a result of the Security Event.

Faneuil did 0t incur any expenses as a result of the Security Event during the three months ended March 31, 2022. Faneuil incurred approximately $0.2 million of Security Event related expenses, recorded in selling, general, and administrative expense during the six months ended March 31, 2022. As of March 31, 2022, Faneuil’s insurance recovery receivable was approximately $1.2 million, included with other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for amounts that are considered probable for recovery. The insurance proceeds are expected to be received before July 31, 2022.

Should Faneuil expect to receive additional insurance recoveries, above the $1.2 million insurance recovery receivable on March 31, 2022, they will be recorded when considered probable for recovery.

Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (“Harland Clarke”), a stockholder who owns ALJ shares in excess of five percent, is a counterparty to Faneuil in two contracts. One contract provides call center services to support Harland Clarke’s banking-related products and renews annual every April. The other contract provides dispatch services for managed print operations and concluded September 30, 2017. Faneuil recognized revenue from Harland Clarke totaling $94,000 and $327,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The associated cost of revenue was $94,000 and $308,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. All revenue from Harland Clarke contained similar terms and conditions as those found in other transactions of this nature entered into by ALJ and its subsidiaries. Total accounts receivable from Harland Clarke was $94,000 and $106,000 at December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, respectively.

As discussed in Note 1, ALJ has organized its business along ~~three~~2 reportable segments (Faneuil ~~Carpets,~~ and Phoenix)~~, together with~~ and a corporate group for certain support services. ALJ’s operating segments are aligned on the basis of products, services, and industry. As a result of the Phoenix Sale on April 1, 2022, Phoenix results of operations were reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) is ALJ’s Chief Executive ~~Chairman.~~Officer. The CODM manages the business, allocates resources to, and assesses the performance of each operating segment using information about its net revenue and segment adjusted EBITDA. ALJ defines segment adjusted EBITDA as segment net ~~income (loss)~~loss before depreciation and amortization, interest expense, net, acquisition/disposition-related expenses, lease impairment, restructuring and cost reduction initiatives, Security Event expenses, stock-based compensation, gain on disposal of assets, net, bank fees accreted to term loans, loan amendment expenses, and provision for income ~~taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring expense, acquisition-related expense, loss (gain) on sales of assets, and other non-recurring items.~~taxes. Such amounts are detailed in ~~our~~ALJ’s segment reconciliation below. The accounting policies for segment reporting are the same as for ALJ as a whole.

~~The following tables present ALJ’s segment information for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands~~):

Three Months Ended December 31, 2017

Faneuil

Carpets

Phoenix

ALJ

Total

Net revenue

$
51,474

$
16,650

$
26,830

$
—

$
94,954

Segment adjusted EBITDA

$
3,711

$
(726
)

$
4,160

$
(555
)

$
6,590

Interest expense

(2,660
)
Provision for income taxes

(3,371
)
Depreciation and amortization

(4,833
)
Stock-based compensation

(293
)
Restructuring expenses

(835
)
Acquisition-related expenses

(123
)
Gain on sales of assets

207

Net loss

$
(5,318
)

Three Months Ended December 31, 2016

Faneuil

Carpets

Phoenix

ALJ

Total

Net revenue

$
38,051

$
15,544

$
24,022

$
—

$
77,617

Segment adjusted EBITDA

$
3,761

$
(47
)

$
4,348

$
(834
)

$
7,228

Interest expense

(2,434
)
Provision for income taxes

(60
)
Depreciation and amortization

(3,961
)
Stock-based compensation

(183
)
Restructuring expenses

(31
)
Loss on sales of assets

(8
)
Net income

$
551

The following tables present ALJ’s segment information for the three and six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

Substantially all of the Company’s assets were located in the United States. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue was earned in the United States.

~~ALJ issued 300,000 shares of common stock upon exercise of employee stock options at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.93 per share.~~

Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is provided in addition to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. MD&A is organized as follows:

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in “Part I, Item 1 – Financial Statements.” The following discussion contains a number of forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "goals," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "continues," "may," "will," "should," and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the risk and uncertainties described in “Part II, Item 1A - ~~“Risk~~Risk Factors.” Our actual results may differ materially.

ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. ~~(“ALJ”~~(including subsidiaries, referred to collectively herein as “ALJ” or ~~“we”~~“Company”) is a holding ~~company that operates Faneuil, Inc., or~~ company. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2022, ALJ consisted of the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:

ALJ owned a third segment, Floors-N-More, LLC, d/b/a, Carpets N’ More or(“Carpets”). Carpets was a floor covering retailer in Las Vegas, Nevada, and ~~Phoenix Color Corp., or Phoenix.~~ a provider of multiple products for the commercial, retail and home builder markets including all types of flooring, countertops, cabinets, window coverings and garage/closet organizers. ALJ acquired and disposed of Carpets in April 2014 and February 2021, respectively. See Discontinued Operations – Carpets below.

With several members of our senior management and Board of Directors coming from long careers in the professional ~~service~~services industry, ALJ is focused on acquiring and operating exceptional ~~customer service-based~~ businesses.

We continue to see our business evolve as we execute our strategy of buying ~~attractively-valued~~attractively valued assets such as the acquisition of the Printing Components Business by Phoenix on October 2, 2017, the acquisition of the customer management outsourcing business (“CMO Business”) by Faneuil on May 26, 2017, and ~~the acquisition of Color Optics by Phoenix on July 18, 2016.~~selling existing assets when advantageous. In analyzing the financial impact of any potential acquisition, we focus on earnings, operating margin, cash flow and return on invested capital targets. We hire successful and experienced management teams to run each of our operating companies and incentivize them to drive higher profits. We are focused on increasing our net revenue at each of our operating subsidiaries by investing in sales and marketing, expanding into new products and markets, and evaluating and executing on tuck-in acquisitions, while continually examining our cost structures to drive higher profits.

In February 2021, ALJ completed the sale of Carpets (the “Carpets Sale”). The Company determined that the Carpets Sale qualified as discontinued operations as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20-45, Presentation of Financial Statements — Discontinued Operations — Other Presentation Matters (“ASC 205”) because the Carpets Sale represented a strategic shift with a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. Pursuant to ASC 205, Carpets results of operations ~~are impacted~~and cash flows were classified as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2021.

On April 1, 2022, in connection with the Faneuil Asset Sale, the Company repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all commitments and obligations under that certain Financing Agreement, dated June 29, 2021 (the “Blue Torch Term Loan”). ALJ’s payment to Blue Torch was approximately $92.2 million, which satisfied all of the Company’s debt obligations under the Blue Torch Term Loan (“Blue Torch Payoff”). The Company was not required to pay any prepayment premiums as a result of the repayment of indebtedness under the Blue Torch Term Loan, which provided that the mandatory prepayment made in connection with the proceeds from the Faneuil Asset Sale were exempt from such pre-payment premiums. In connection with the repayment of outstanding

indebtedness by the ~~timing~~Company, the lenders automatically and permanently released all security interests, mortgages, liens and encumbrances under the Blue Torch Term Loan.

In connection with the ~~CMO Business~~Phoenix Sale on April 13, 2022, the Company repaid in full all outstanding indebtedness and terminated all commitments and obligations under that Amended and Restated Financing Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2021 (as amended, the “PNC Revolver”). The Company was required to pay a pre-payment premium of $0.3 million as a result of the repayment of indebtedness under the PNC Revolver. In connection with the repayment of outstanding indebtedness by ~~Faneuil on May 26, 2017,~~the Company, the lenders automatically and permanently released all security interests, mortgages, liens and encumbrances under the ~~Printing Components Business by Phoenix on October 2, 2017.~~ PNC Revolver.

The following table sets forth certain ~~condensed consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations data in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue for each period as ~~follows (in thousands, except per share amounts~~):follows:

Three Months Ended December 31, 2017

Three Months Ended December 31, 2016

% of

% of

Dollars

Net Revenue

Dollars

Net Revenue

Net revenue⁽¹⁾

Faneuil

$
51,474

54.2
%

$
38,051

49.0
%
Carpets

16,650

17.5

15,544

20.0

Phoenix

26,830

28.3

24,022

31.0

Consolidated net revenue

94,954

100.0

77,617

100.0

Cost of revenue ⁽²⁾

Faneuil

40,219

78.1

29,002

76.2

Carpets

13,803

82.9

13,247

85.2

Phoenix ⁽³⁾

20,888

77.9

17,932

74.6

Consolidated cost of revenue

74,910

78.9

60,181

77.5

Selling, general and administrative expense ⁽²⁾

Faneuil

7,544

14.7

5,288

13.9

Carpets

3,573

21.5

2,343

15.1

Phoenix

4,139

15.4

3,055

12.7

ALJ

848

—

1,018

—

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expense

16,104

17.0

11,704

15.1

Depreciation and amortization ⁽²⁾

Faneuil

2,576

5.0

1,863

4.9

Carpets

219

1.3

175

1.1

Phoenix⁽⁴⁾

639

2.4

641

2.7

Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense

3,434

3.6

2,679

3.5

(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net ⁽²⁾

Phoenix

(207
)

(0.8
)

8

—

Consolidated (gain) loss on disposal of assets, net

(207
)

(0.2
)

8

—

Consolidated operating income

713

0.8

3,045

3.9

Interest expense ⁽⁵⁾

(2,660
)

(2.8
)

(2,434
)

(3.1
)
Provision for income taxes⁽⁵⁾

(3,371
)

(3.6
)

(60
)

(0.1
)
Net (loss) income ⁽⁵⁾

$
(5,318
)

(5.6
)

$
551

0.7

Basic (loss) earnings per share of common stock

$
(0.14
)

$
0.02

Diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock

$
(0.14
)

$
0.02

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2022						Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
				% of						% of
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Dollars			Net Revenue			Dollars			Net Revenue
Net revenue
Faneuil	$	68,514			100.0	%	$	84,424			100.0	%
Consolidated net revenue		68,514			100.0			84,424			100.0
Cost of revenue
Faneuil		58,194			84.9			70,160			83.1
Consolidated cost of revenue		58,194			84.9			70,160			83.1
Selling, general, and administrative expense
Faneuil		7,561			11.0			9,424			11.2
ALJ		3,689			—			1,804			—
Consolidated selling, general, and administrative expense		11,250			16.4			11,228			13.3
Depreciation and amortization expense
Faneuil		2,754			4.0			3,125			3.7
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense		2,754			4.0			3,125			3.7
Lease impairment		2,158			3.1			—			0.0
Total consolidated operating expenses		74,356			108.5			84,513			100.1
Consolidated operating loss		(5,842	)		(8.5	)		(89	)		(0.1	)
Interest expense		(2,593	)		(3.8	)		(2,451	)		(2.9	)
Provision for income taxes		(46	)		(0.7	)		(50	)		(0.6	)
Net loss from continuing operations		(8,481	)		(12.4	)		(2,590	)		(3.1	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		5,565			8.1			2,475			2.9
Net loss	$	(2,916	)		(4.3	)	$	(115	)		(0.1	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–basic:
Continuing operations	$	(0.20	)				$	(0.06	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.13					$	0.06
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾	$	(0.07	)				$	—
(Loss) income per share of common stock–diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.20	)				$	(0.06	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.10					$	0.05
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾	$	(0.07	)				$	—
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic		42,409						42,321
Diluted		54,691						54,458

Faneuil net revenue for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$51.5~~$68.5 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$13.4~~$15.9 million, or ~~35.3%~~18.8%, compared to net revenue of ~~$38.1~~$84.4 million for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016.~~2021. The ~~increase~~decrease was mainly attributable to the CMO Business acquisition, which contributed $8.5 million. The remaining increase was attributable to an increase from new and existing customers mostly in the healthcare industry, slightly offset by a ~~decrease caused~~$19.5 million reduction driven by the completion of customer contracts, somewhat offset by a $2.9 million net increase in existing customer ~~contracts.~~call volumes.

The following table, which has been adjusted for the Faneuil Asset Sale, reflects the amount of Faneuil’s backlog, which represents multi-year contract deliverables, by the ~~fiscal~~ year Faneuil expects to recognize such net ~~revenue (in millions~~):revenue:

~~The majority of the increase as of December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 was the result new contracts within the transportation and healthcare markets, and the CMO Business acquisition.~~

Carpets net revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $16.7 million, an increase of $1.1 million, or 7.1%, compared to net revenue of $15.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to higher volumes from sales of cabinet and granite products.

The following table reflects the amount of Carpets’ backlog, which represents multi-year contracts with contractors to build-out communities with typical terms of two to three years, by the fiscal year Carpets expects to recognize such net revenue (~~in millions~~):

The decrease ~~at December~~in total Faneuil backlog from March 31, ~~2017,~~2022 compared to ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016,~~2021 was aprimarily the result of ~~the fulfilment~~negotiating an early termination of ~~contracts during the year ended December~~a large unprofitable contract and revenue recognition of contract backlog on March 31, ~~2017 for contracts in place at December 31, 2016.~~

Phoenix net revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $26.8 million, an increase of $2.8 million, or 11.7%, compared to net revenue of $24.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase was a result of the acquisition of the Printing Component Business, which contributed net revenue of $4.5 million during the three months ended December 31, 2017. This increase was offset by a decrease in revenue from the remaining business of $1.7 million during the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, due to lower volumes for books and components.

The following table reflects the amount of Phoenix’s backlog, which represents executed contracts that contain minimum volume commitments over multiple years for future product deliveries, by the fiscal year Phoenix expects to recognize such net revenue (~~in millions~~):2021.

~~The majority~~For further discussion of the increase as of December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 was a result of the Printing Components Business acquisition, slightly offset by the fulfillment of orders during the year ended December 31, 2017 for contracts in place at December 31, 2016.

~~See~~our subsidiaries’ backlog, see “Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors - Risks Related to our Business Generally and our Common Stock - We may not receive the full amounts estimated under the contracts in our backlog, which could reduce our net revenue in future periods below the levels anticipated. This makes backlog an uncertain indicator of future operating results.”

Faneuil cost of revenue for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$40.2~~$58.2 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$11.2~~$12.0 million, or ~~38.7%~~17.1%, compared to cost of revenue of ~~$29.0~~$70.2 million for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016.~~2021. The ~~absolute dollar increase~~decrease in cost of revenue was a direct result of the ~~increased~~decreased net revenue. During the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, as compared to the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016,~~2021, cost of revenue as a percentage of segment net revenue increased to ~~78.1%~~84.9% from ~~76.2%~~83.1%, respectively, as a result of ~~the integration of the CMO Business.~~

~~Carpets cost of revenue for~~supplementing Faneuil’s call center workforce with more costly subcontract labor during the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017 was $13.8 million, an increase~~2022.

Phoenix cost of revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $20.9 million, an increase of $3.0 million, or 16.5% compared to cost of revenue of $17.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The absolute dollar increase in cost of revenue was mainly attributable to increased net revenue associated with the aforementioned Printing Components Business acquisition. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016, cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue increased to 77.9% from 74.6% as a result of changes in product mix sold, and some duplicate expenses incurred with the Printing Components Business acquisition. Phoenix experiences normal fluctuations to cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue as a result of changes to the mix of products sold.

Faneuil selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$7.5~~$7.6 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$2.3~~$1.9 million, or ~~42.7%~~19.8%, compared to selling, general, and administrative expense of ~~$5.3~~$9.4 million for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016.~~2021. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily attributable to ~~the CMO Business acquisition, which added $1.5 million,~~lower performance-based bonuses for selling, general, and ~~expenses to support existing customers, mostly in the healthcare industry~~administrative personnel and reduced legal fees as a result of ~~open enrollment season, which added $1.6 million. This increase was partially~~settling legal claims, slightly offset by ~~reduced expenses of $0.8 million to onboard new customers and $0.1 million related to customer contracts that concluded.~~higher bad debt expense driven by one terminated contract. During the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 compared to the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016,~~2021, selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of segment net revenue ~~increased to 14.7% from 13.9%.~~was fairly constant at 11.0% and 11.2%, respectively. Certain selling, general, and administrative expenses do not fluctuate directly with net revenue. As such, we expect selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of segment net revenue to fluctuate.

Carpets selling, general and administrative expense was $3.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $1.2 million, or 52.5%, compared to selling, general and administrative expense of $2.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily attributable to increased headcount to support growth in the cabinet and granite divisions, and to a lesser extent, increased legal fees to defend against legal claims. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenue increased to 21.5% for the three months ended December 31, 2017 from 15.1% for the three months ended December 31, 2016 as a result of incurring additional expenses, which do not fluctuate with net revenue.

~~Phoenix~~ALJ selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$4.1~~$3.7 million, an increase of ~~$1.1~~$1.9 million, or ~~35.5%~~104.5%, compared to selling, general, and administrative expense of $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. The increase was mainly attributable to acquisition/disposition-related legal fees.

Faneuil depreciation and amortization expense was $2.8 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016.~~2022 and March 31, 2021, respectively. Because certain Faneuil contracts require capital investments, Faneuil depreciation and amortization expense is impacted by the timing of new contracts and the completion of existing contracts.

Interest expense was consistent at $2.6 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, respectively. Interest expense was impacted by lower interest rates offset by higher amortization of deferred loan costs, which were both attributable to our debt refinance in June 2021.

We recorded a provision for income taxes from continuing operations of less than $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2022 was (0.6)%, as a result of generating state taxable income, offset by changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was (2.0%), which was also due to generating state taxable income, offset by changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. The increase in our effective tax rate was attributable to an increase in forecasted operating losses, as well as changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets.

We recorded a provision for income taxes for discontinued operations of $0.3 million and less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

As a result of the Phoenix Sale, Phoenix results of operations were classified as discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Both the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were attributable to the operations of Phoenix. We expect to report a gain on the sale of Phoenix during the three months ended June 30, 2022.

As a result of the sale of Carpets in February 2021, Carpets had no discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2022.

Segment adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure used by our management and chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to manage the business, allocate resources, and assess the performance of each operating segment. ALJ defines segment adjusted EBITDA as segment net loss before depreciation and amortization, interest expense, net, acquisition/disposition-related expenses, restructuring and cost reduction initiatives, Security Event expenses, stock-based compensation, gain on disposal of assets, net, bank fees accreted to term loans, loan amendment expenses, and provision for income taxes. The following table summarizes segment adjusted EBITDA.

Faneuil segment adjusted EBITDA was $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to segment adjusted EBITDA of $5.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. Segment adjusted EBITDA decreased $2.2 million, or 44.9%, driven by the completion of certain contracts.

ALJ segment adjusted EBITDA loss for the three months ended March 31, 2022 was ($1.4) million for both the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.

The following table sets forth certain Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations data in dollars and as a percentage of net revenue for each period as follows:

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2022						Six Months Ended March 31, 2021
				% of						% of
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Dollars			Net Revenue			Dollars			Net Revenue
Net revenue
Faneuil	$	143,293			100.0	%	$	170,393			100.0	%
Consolidated net revenue		143,293			100.0			170,393			100.0
Cost of revenue
Faneuil		125,719			87.7			144,038			84.5
Consolidated cost of revenue		125,719			87.7			144,038			84.5
Selling, general, and administrative expense
Faneuil		16,874			11.8			17,902			10.5
ALJ		7,586			—			3,481			—
Consolidated selling, general, and administrative expense		24,460			17.1			21,383			12.5
Depreciation and amortization expense
Faneuil		6,139			4.3			6,340			3.7
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense		6,139			4.3			6,340			3.7
Lease impairment		2,158			1.5			—			—
Loss on disposal of assets, net		26			—			—			—
Total consolidated operating expenses		158,502			110.6			171,761			100.8
Consolidated operating loss		(15,209	)		(10.6	)		(1,368	)		(0.8	)
Interest expense		(5,298	)		(3.7	)		(5,033	)		(3.0	)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes		55			0.4			(174	)		(1.0	)
Net loss from continuing operations		(20,452	)		(14.3	)		(6,575	)		(3.9	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		8,144			5.7			4,373			2.6
Net loss	$	(12,308	)		(8.6	)	$	(2,202	)		(1.3	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–basic:
Continuing operations	$	(0.48	)				$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.19					$	0.10
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾	$	(0.29	)				$	(0.05	)
(Loss) income per share of common stock–diluted	$	—					$	—
Continuing operations	$	(0.48	)				$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.15					$	0.08
Net loss per share ⁽¹⁾	$	(0.29	)				$	(0.05	)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic		42,406						42,319
Diluted		54,681						54,363

Faneuil net revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2022 was $143.3 million, a decrease of $27.1 million, or 15.9%, compared to net revenue of $170.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2021. The decrease was mainly attributable to a $38.8 million reduction driven by the ~~Printing Component Business acquisition~~completion of customer contracts, somewhat offset by an $11.0 million net increase in existing customer call volumes.

Faneuil cost of revenue for the six months ended March 31, 2022 was $125.7 million, a decrease of $18.3 million, or 12.7%, compared to cost of revenue of $144.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2021. The decrease in cost of revenue was a direct result of the decreased net revenue. During the six months ended March 31, 2022, as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2021, cost of revenue as a percentage of segment net revenue increased to 87.7% from 84.5%, respectively, as a result of supplementing Faneuil’s call center workforce with more costly subcontract labor during the six months ended March 31, 2022.

Faneuil selling, general, and administrative expense ~~incurred~~for the six months ended March 31, 2022 was $16.9 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 5.7%, compared to ~~consolidate manufacturing facilities~~selling, general, and administrative expense of ~~$0.8 million. Selling,~~$17.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower performance-based bonuses for selling, general, and administrative personnel and reduced legal fees as a result of settling legal claims, slightly offset by higher bad debt expense driven by one terminated contract and higher medical insurance claims under Faneuil’s self-insurance medical plan. During the six months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2021, selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of segment net revenue increased to ~~15.4% for~~11.8% from 10.5% mostly due to the ~~three months ended December 31, 2017 from 12.7% for the three months ended December 31, 2016.~~decrease in net revenue. Certain selling, general, and administrative expenses do not fluctuate directly with net revenue. As such, we expect selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of segment net revenue to fluctuate.

ALJ selling, general, and administrative expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$0.8~~$7.6 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$0.2~~$4.1 million, or ~~16.7%~~117.9%, compared to selling, general, and administrative expense of ~~$1.0~~$3.5 million for the ~~three~~six months ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2020. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~primarily~~mainly attributable to allocating certain expenses, including accounting and tax preparation, to our subsidiaries to better align expenses with ALJ’s consolidated reporting structure. Such decrease was somewhat offset by an increased compensation expense associated with the appointment of a new chief financial officer and an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation costs for key employees and board of directors. We expect selling, general and administrative expense to fluctuate in the future as we comply with SEC reporting requirements and regulations, and allocate certain expenses to our subsidiaries.acquisition/disposition-related legal fees.

Faneuil depreciation and amortization expense ~~for the three months ended December 31, 2017~~ was ~~$2.6~~consistent at $6.1 million ~~an increase of $0.7 million, or 38.3%, compared to depreciation~~ and ~~amortization expense of $1.9~~$6.3 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016. The increase was mainly attributable to the CMO Business acquisition,~~2022 and ~~to a lesser extent~~March 31, 2021, respectively. Because certain Faneuil contracts require capital ~~equipment purchased to support new and expanded contracts. Because each Faneuil contract requires unique capital investment and infrastructure such as lease buildouts,~~investments, Faneuil depreciation and amortization expense is impacted by the timing of new contracts and the completion of existing contracts.

Carpets depreciation and amortization expense for both the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.2 million. The slight increase of less than $0.1 million, or 25.1%, was attributable to the installation of automation machinery to support the new granite and stone facility.

Phoenix depreciation and amortization expense consists primarily of amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expense remained relatively unchanged at $0.6 million for both the three months ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Interest expense ~~for the three months ended December 31, 2017~~ was ~~$2.7~~consistent at $5.3 million ~~an increase of $0.2 million, or 9.3%, compared to interest expense of $2.4~~and $5.0 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016. The increase~~2022 and March 31, 2021, respectively. Interest expense was ~~primarily~~impacted by lower interest rates offset by higher amortization of deferred loan costs, which were both attributable to ~~the $8.2 million increase to~~ our line of credit to fund working capital requirements, and the $7.5 million increased borrowing on our term loan to acquire the Printing Components Business, partially offset by reduced interest resulting from quarterly principal payments. debt refinance in June 2021.

ALJ recorded a benefit from income ~~tax provision was $3.4 million~~taxes for ~~the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to less than~~continuing operations of $0.1 million ~~for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase during the three months ended December 31, 2017 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2016 was due to~~and a one-time revaluation of deferred tax assets, which was the result of new tax reform legislation enacted on December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Reform Law”). We recorded the provisional impacts of the Tax Reform Law as of December 31, 2017, based on our current knowledge, interpretation, and understanding of the Tax Reform Law and its impact to our business. While we were able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of certain aspects of the Tax Reform Law, we may be affected by other aspects, including, but not limited to, the state tax effect of adjustments made to federal temporary differences, and the interest expense deduction limitation.

We will continue to assess the impact of the Tax Reform Law on our future taxes and our consolidated financial statements. Actual impacts could be materially different from current estimates. See “Part I, Item 1. Financial ~~Statements – Note 10. Income Taxes.”~~

~~Segment adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure used by our management and chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to~~ ~~manage the business, allocate resources, and assesses the performance of each operating segments. ALJ defines segment adjusted EBITDA as segment net income (loss) before interest expense,~~ provision for income taxes ~~depreciation~~of $0.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2022 and ~~amortization expense, stock-based compensation expense, restructuring expense, acquisition-related expense, loss (gain) on sales~~2021, respectively. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the six months ended March 31, 2022 was 0.3%, as a result of ~~assets,~~generating state taxable income, offset by changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the six months ended March 31, 2021 was (3.0%), which was also due to generating state taxable income, offset by changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. The increase in our effective tax rate was attributable to an increase in forecasted operating losses, as well as changes to the valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets.

We recorded a provision for income taxes for discontinued operations of $0.2 million for the six months ended March 31, 2022 and ~~other non-recurring items.~~2021.

~~The following table summarizes our segment adjusted EBITDA for each period (in thousands):~~

As a result of the Phoenix Sale, Phoenix results of operations were classified as discontinued operations for the six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Both the six months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were attributable to the operations of Phoenix.

As a result of the sale of Carpets in February 2021, Carpets had no discontinued operations during the six months ended March 31, 2022.

Faneuil segment adjusted EBITDA was $0.9 million for ~~both~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 was basically flat at $3.7 million. Higher expenses related to new technology, training and call handling for the new CMO Business offset the increased net revenue recognized from the new CMO Business contracts.

~~Carpets segment adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $(0.7) million~~2022 compared to segment adjusted EBITDA of ~~less than $(0.1)~~$8.6 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2016. The three months ended December 31, 2017 was impacted by higher administrative personnel costs, homebuilder discounts, legal fees, bad debt expense, inventory reserves, and higher expenses associated with the granite business.

~~Phoenix segment~~ adjusted EBITDA ~~was $4.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $0.2~~decreased $7.7 million, or ~~4.3%~~89.1%, ~~compared~~driven by the wind-down of certain contracts, higher medical insurance claims under Faneuil’s self-insurance medical plan, and the usage of more costly subcontract labor to ~~segment adjusted EBITDA of $4.4 million for~~supplement the ~~three months ended December 31, 2016. The majority of the decrease was attributable to lower sales volumes for books and components.~~call center workforce.

ALJ segment adjusted EBITDA loss for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$(0.6)~~($2.8) million compared to segment adjusted EBITDA loss of ~~$(0.8) million. The three~~($2.6) million for the six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2021. ALJ segment adjusted EBITDA loss for six months ended March 31, 2022 was impacted by ~~allocating certain expenses, including accounting~~additional headcount and tax preparation, to our subsidiaries to better align expenses with ALJ’s consolidated reporting structure. Such decrease was somewhat offset by an increased compensation expense associated with the appointment of a new chief financial officer. compensation-related expenses.

Segment adjusted EBITDA is not considered a non-GAAP measure because we include segment adjusted EBITDA in our segment disclosures in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification Topic 280 – Segment Reporting. See “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statement ~~– Note 12.~~ ~~Reportable Segments and Geographic Information.” As such, we do not provide a reconciliation from net (loss) income to segment adjusted EBITDA.~~

Faneuil experiences seasonality within its various lines of business. For example, during the end of the calendar year through the end of the first calendar quarter, Faneuil generally experiences higher revenue with its healthcare customers as the customer contact centers increase operations during the enrollment periods of the healthcare exchanges. Faneuil’s revenue from its healthcare customers generally decreases during the remaining portion of the year after the enrollment period. Seasonality is less prevalent in the transportation industry, though there is typically an increase in volume during the summer months.

Carpets generally experiences seasonality within the home building business as the number of houses sold during the winter months is generally lower than the number of homes sold during other times during the year. Conversely, the number of houses sold and delivered during the remaining portion of the year increases by comparison.

There is seasonality to Phoenix’s business. Education book component sales (school and college) traditionally peak in the first and second quarters of the calendar year. Other book components sales traditionally peak in the third quarter of the calendar year. Book sales also traditionally peak in the third quarter of the calendar year. The fourth quarter of the calendar year traditionally has been the Phoenix’s weakest quarter. These seasonal factors are not significant.

Historically, our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operations and borrowings under various debt arrangements. ~~At December 31, 2017, our principal sources of liquidity included cash~~During April 2022, the following transactions had, and cash equivalents of $2.0 million and an available borrowing capacity of $10.8 million on our line of credit. Our principal uses of cash have been for acquisitions and to pay down debt. We anticipate these uses will continue to behave, a significant impact on our ~~principal uses of~~ liquidity and capital resources:

~~Global financial and credit markets have been volatile in recent years, and future adverse conditions~~MD&A introduction above for a further discussion of these ~~markets could negatively affect~~transactions.

The following table summarizes the impact that the above transactions had, or are expected to have, on our ~~ability~~liquidity. The amounts are management’s best estimates at the time this report was filed and are subject to ~~secure funds or raise capital at a reasonable cost or at all. For additional discussion~~change.

In summary, our cash flows for each period were as ~~follows (in thousands~~):follows:

WeFor the six months ended March 31, 2022, we recognized a net loss of ~~$5.3~~$12.3 million, ~~for the three months ended December 31, 2017,~~ used cash ~~of $3.7 million~~ for operating activities ~~and $9.6~~of $0.1 million, used cash for investing activities ~~offset by $9.7~~of $3.0 million, and generated cash ~~provided by~~from financing ~~activities.~~ activities of $3.5 million.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016 and~~2021, we recognized a net loss of $2.2 million, generated cash from operating activities of ~~$8.3~~$11.1 million, ~~offset by~~used cash ~~used by~~for investing activities of ~~$3.9~~$3.7 million, and used cash for financing activities of ~~$5.2~~$8.9 million.

Cash used for ~~operations~~operating activities of ~~$3.7~~$0.1 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017~~2022 was the result of our ~~$5.3~~$12.3 million net loss, ~~$8.6~~$9.7 million addback of net non-cash expenses, and $7.0 million of net cash used by changes in operating assets and liabilities. The most significant components of net non-cash expenses were depreciation and amortization of $4.8 million, stock-based compensation of $0.3 million, amortization of non-cash interest expense of $0.3 million, and deferred income taxes of $3.3 million. The most significant components of changes in operating assets and liabilities included accounts receivable of $6.2 million, prepaid expenses and other current assets of $2.0 million, and deferred revenue and customer deposits of $1.9 million, which used cash, offset by accrued expenses of $1.1 million and inventories of $1.0 million, which provided cash.

~~Cash provided by operations of $8.3 million during the three months ended December 31, 2016 was the result of our $0.6 million net income, $4.1 million addback of net non-cash expenses, and $3.6~~$2.5 million of net cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities. The most significant ~~components~~component of net non-cash expenses ~~were~~was depreciation and amortization expense of ~~$4.0 million, stock-based compensation of $0.2~~$6.1 million and ~~amortization~~lease impairment of ~~non-cash interest expense of $0.2 million, offset~~$2.2, which was driven by ~~deferred income tax benefit of $0.3 million.~~subleasing excess real estate. The most significant components of changes in operating assets and liabilities ~~included inventories~~were mostly attributable to the timing of ~~$1.3~~cash receipts from Faneuil’s customers and repayment of 50%, or $3.6 million, ~~collateral deposits~~ of ~~$1.3~~payroll-related taxes, which were deferred in previous reporting periods under the CARES Act.

Cash provided by operating activities of $11.1 million during the six months ended March 31, 2021 was the result of our $2.2 million

net loss, $8.5 million addback of net non-cash expenses, and $4.8 million of net cash provided by changes in operating assets and

liabilities. The most significant component of net non-cash expenses was depreciation and amortization expense of $6.3 million. The

most significant components of changes in operating assets and liabilities were mostly attributable to the timing of Faneuil’s significant new customer implementations and included accounts payable of ~~$3.8 million, accrued expenses of $1.9~~$4.4 million, and ~~other liabilities~~deferred revenue and customer deposits of ~~$1.8 million which provided cash, and accounts receivable of $3.7 million, and other assets of $2.2~~$2.8 million, which used cash. Additionally, the CARES Act allowed us to defer payment for $7.2 million of payroll-related taxes, of which $3.6 million was recorded in accrued expenses and $3.6 million was recorded in other non-current liabilities on March 31, 2021. Our discontinued operations provided $7.7 million of cash ~~flow from~~in the normal course of operations.

Cash used for operations for the six months ended March 31, 2022, compared to cash provided by operations for the six months ended March 31, 2021, was ~~negatively~~ impacted by ~~one large past due account receivable due to Faneuil. See “Part 2, Item 1 – Legal Proceedings.”~~ the timing of the repayment and deferral of payroll-related taxes under the CARES Act.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, our investing activities used $9.6 million, of which $9.0 million was for our Printing Components Business acquisition, and $1.0 million was to purchase capital equipment in the normal course of operations, offset by $0.3 million cash proceeds from the sale of assets.

~~For the three months ended December 31, 2016, our investing activities used $3.9~~$3.0 million of cash, of which ~~$2.9~~$2.3 million was used by our discontinued operations to upgrade printer equipment, and $0.7 million was used to purchase computer equipment and software to support Faneuil’s new and existing customers.

For the six months ended March 31, 2021, our investing activities used $3.7 million of cash, of which $2.6 million was used to purchase equipment, software, and leasehold improvements for Faneuil’s new and existing customers, and ~~$1.0~~$0.1 million was used to purchase capital equipment in the normal course of operations, offset by $0.4 million cash proceeds from the sale of Carpets. Additionally, our discontinued operations used $1.5 million of cash to purchase equipment in the normal course of operations.

Our investing activities during the six months ended March 31, 2022, compared to the six months ended March 31, 2021, were consistent and a result of normal business operations.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, our financing activities provided ~~$9.7~~$3.5 million of ~~cash. Proceeds from~~cash as a result of drawing down on our line of credit ~~provided $8.2~~of $6.1 million ~~proceeds from our amended term loan provided $7.5 million (see further discussion at~~ ~~Contractual Obligations~~ ~~below),~~to pay short-term liabilities, including annual bonuses and the ~~issuance~~repayment of ~~common stock provided $1.5 million. Proceeds from~~ the ~~amended~~CARES Act payroll-related taxes discussed above, partially offset by quarterly principal payments, totaling $1.9 million, on our term ~~loan~~loan.

For the six months ended March 31, 2021, our financing activities used $8.9 million of cash. We used $2.3 million to pay down our line of credit, $1.4 million for finance lease payments, and ~~issuance of common stock were used to fund our Printing Components Business acquisition discussed above. Financing activities which used cash include $6.4~~$4.1 million to pay down our term ~~loan, $0.7 million for capital lease payments, and $0.3 million for debt and stock issuance costs.~~

~~For the three months ended December 31, 2016,~~loans. Additionally, our ~~financing activities~~discontinued operations used ~~$5.2~~$1.1 million of cash ~~of which $4.5 million was used~~ to pay down term loans and finance lease payments.

Cash used for financing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2022 compared to cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2021 was impacted by the payment of short-term liabilities, which required us to draw on our line of credit facility. Our quarterly principal payments on our term loan ~~$0.4 million was used for payments on capital leases~~were reduced as a result of our debt refinance in June 2021.

The Faneuil Asset Sale and ~~$0.3 million was used for payments on financed insurance premiums.~~

~~The~~the Phoenix Sale, which resulted in the Blue Torch Loan Payoff and PNC Revolver termination, had a material impact to our contractual obligations. As such, the following table summarizes ~~our significant~~pro forma contractual obligations ~~at December~~on March 31, ~~2017,~~2022 adjusted for the Blue Torch Loan Payoff and PNC Revolver termination, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future ~~periods (in thousands~~):periods:

Payments due by Period

Less Than

One – Three

Four – Five

More than Five

Total

One Year

Years

Years

Years

Line of credit⁽¹⁾

$
13,662

$
—

$
13,662

$
—

$
—

Term loan payable⁽¹⁾

92,091

9,188

82,903

—

—

Operating lease obligations

20,612

4,722

8,745

7,145

—

Capital lease obligations

9,305

3,575

4,697

1,033

—

Other long-term liabilities⁽²⁾

4,631

989

3,642

—

—

Total contractual cash obligations

$
140,301

$
18,474

$
113,649

$
8,178

$
—

	Payments due by Period
			Less Than		One – Three		Four – Five		More than Five
(in thousands)	Total		One Year		Years		Years		Years
Operating lease obligations ⁽¹⁾	$	23,231	$	3,044	$	7,519	$	7,160	$	5,508
Other liabilities ⁽²⁾		7,942		3,400		4,542		—		—
Convertible Promissory Notes ⁽³⁾		6,026		—		6,026		—		—
Finance lease obligations ⁽¹⁾		720		720		—		—		—
Total contractual cash obligations ⁽⁴⁾	$	37,919	$	7,164	$	18,087	$	7,160	$	5,508

(1) In August 2015, ALJ entered into a financing agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC (“Cerberus”), to borrow $105.0 million in a term loan (“Cerberus Term Loan”) and have available up to $30.0 million in a revolving loan (“Cerberus/PNC Revolver”), collectively (“Cerberus Debt”). ALJ has subsequently entered into three amendments to the Financing Agreement. The Financing Agreement and three amendments are summarized below (~~in thousands~~):

*~~Range of annual interest rates accrued during the three months ended December 31, 2017.~~

~~Interest payments are due in arrears on the first day of each month.~~ Quarterly principal payments are due on the last day of each fiscal quarter. Annual principal payments equal to 75% of ALJ’s excess cash flow (“ECF”), as defined in the Financing Agreement, are due upon delivery of the audited financial statements. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, ALJ made an ECF payment of $4.1 million. A final balloon payment is due at maturity, August 14, 2020. There is a prepayment penalty equal to 1% if the Cerberus Term Loan is repaid prior to August 2018. ALJ may make payments of up to $7.0 million against the loan with no penalty.

~~(2) Amounts represent future cash payments to satisfy our short- and long-term workers’ compensation reserve and other long-term liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets.~~

~~As of December~~On March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, we had two types of off-balance sheet arrangements.

Surety Bonds. As part of Faneuil’s normal course of operations, certain customers require surety bonds guaranteeing the performance of a contract. ~~As of December 31, 2017,~~Subsequent to the Faneuil Asset Sale, the face value of such surety bonds, which represents the maximum cash payments that ~~Faneuil~~Faneuil’s surety would ~~have~~be obligated to ~~make~~pay under certain circumstances of non-performance, was ~~approximately $29.1 million.~~$0.5 million, a decrease from $41.8 million on March 31, 2022. To date, Faneuil has not made any non-performance payments to any of its sureties.

~~Letter~~Letters of Credit. ~~Faneuil~~ALJ had ~~a letter~~letters of credit ~~for $2.7~~totaling $3.5 million asoutstanding on March 31, 2022, which were collateralized by a borrowing sublimit on the PNC Revolver. Subsequent to the termination of ~~December 31, 2017.~~the PNC Revolver, the letters of credit were collateralized by restricted cash.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or ~~U.S.~~ GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses induring the reporting period. ~~Significant~~We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions ~~by management are used for, but are not limited~~related to ~~determining~~ the fair value of assets and liabilities, including intangible assets acquired and allocation of ~~acquisition~~ purchase ~~prices, estimated~~price, useful lives, carrying value and recoverability of long-lived and intangible assets, ~~the recoverability of goodwill, the realizability of deferred tax assets, stock-based compensation, the likelihood of~~and revenue recognition. Certain accounting policies are considered "critical accounting policies" because they are particularly dependent on estimates made by us about matters that are inherently uncertain and could have a material ~~loss as a result of loss contingencies, customer lives, the allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory reserves, and calculation of insurance reserves.~~impact on our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe ~~to be~~are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of revenue, costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us may differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

For a complete summary of our critical accounting policies, please refer to “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, filed with the SEC on December 20, 2021 (“Fiscal 2021 Form 10-K”).

For a complete summary of our significant accounting policies, please refer to ~~Note 2, “Summary~~“Part IV. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules –Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” included ~~with~~in our ~~audited financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2017.~~Fiscal 2021 Form 10-K. There ~~were~~have been no ~~material~~ changes to ~~significant~~our accounting policies during the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017.~~ 2022.

Item 3. Qualitative and ~~Quantitati~~veQuantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, our management evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report at the reasonable assurance level in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There has been no change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting decisions regarding required disclosure.

On October 14, 2016, 3M filed its answer and counterclaim against Faneuil. In its counterclaim, 3M seeks recovery in excess of $10.0 million based on three claims: breach of contract/indemnification, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and unjust enrichment. 3M’s counterclaim alleges it incurred approximately $3.2 million in damages payable to ERC as a result of Faneuil’s conduct and seeks indemnification of an additional $10.0 million in damages incurred as a result of continued performance under its contract with ERC. A five-day bench trial is set for April 2018. A pretrial scheduling order has ~~been entered and the parties are engaged in substantive discovery at this time.~~

On July 31, 2017, plaintiff Donna Marshall (“Marshall”), filed a proposed class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento against Faneuil and ALJ. Marshall, a previously terminated Faneuil employee, alleges various California state law employment-related claims against Faneuil. Faneuil has answered the complaint and removed the matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; however, Marshall has recently filed a motion to remand the case back to state court. The case is in an early stage and the parties have not begun substantive discovery at this time. Faneuil believes this action is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously.

On September 21, 2016, Plaintiffs Clifford Thornton and Tracey Thornton filed a complaint in the Nevada District Court for Clark County against ALJ, Carpets, Steve Chesin, and Jess Ravich. The complaint includes claims for (1) fraud, (2) bad faith, (3) civil conspiracy, (4) unjust enrichment, (5) wrongful termination, (6) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (7) negligent infliction of emotional distress, and (8) loss of marital consortium. On November 1, 2016, the defendants filed an answer to the complaint generally denying all claims. The parties are engaged in substantive discovery at this time, with the close of discovery scheduled for May 25, 2018 and all substantive dispositive motions due June 25, 2018. ALJ and Carpets believe this action is without merit and intend to defend it vigorously.

~~We and our subsidiaries~~ ~~have~~ been named in, and from time to time may become named in, various ~~other~~ lawsuits or threatened actions that are incidental to our ordinary business. For additional information regarding such matters, see “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies - Litigation, ~~is inherently unpredictable. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time-consuming, cause us to incur costs~~Claims, and expenses, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. The results of these lawsuits and actions cannot be predicted with certainty. We concluded as of December 31, 2017 that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our ~~business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.~~Assessments.”

The following risk factors and other information included in this Form 10-Q should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could be significantly harmed.

~~The diversion of resources and management’s attention to the integration of the CMO Business could adversely affect Faneuil’s day-to-day business.~~

The integration of the CMO Business may place a significant burden on Faneuil’s management and internal resources. The diversion of Faneuil management’s attention away from day-to-day business concerns and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could adversely affect Faneuil’s financial results.

~~Faneuil may not be able to integrate the CMO Business successfully, and the anticipated benefits of the CMO Business acquisition may not be realized.~~

Faneuil acquired the CMO Business with the expectation that the acquisition would result in various benefits, including, among other things, expansion and diversification of Faneuil’s revenue base into the utilities market while leveraging its existing core competencies. Achieving those anticipated benefits is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether Faneuil can integrate the operations of the CMO Business in an efficient and effective manner. The integration process could also take longer than Faneuil anticipates and could result in the loss of valuable employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses, processes and systems or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, policies and compensation arrangements, any of which could adversely affect Faneuil’s ability to achieve the benefits it anticipates.

Faneuil is subject to uncertainties regarding healthcare reform that could materially and adversely affect that aspect of our business.

~~On March 23,~~Since its adoption into law in 2010, ~~President Obama signed~~ the Affordable Care Act ~~(the~~ “~~Affordable Care Act~~”~~) into law, which~~ has ~~affected comprehensive health insurance reform, including~~been challenged before the ~~creation~~U.S. Supreme Court, and several bills have been and continue to be introduced in Congress to delay, defund, or repeal implementation of ~~health insurance exchanges, among other reforms. A portion~~or amend significant provisions of ~~Faneuil~~’s healthcare business relates to providing services to health insurance exchanges in various states, and Faneuil believes that there may be significant opportunities for growth in this area. President Trump has disclosed that a key initiative for his Presidency is to repeal or substantially change the Affordable Care Act. ~~For example,~~In addition, there continues to be ongoing litigation over the interpretation and implementation of certain provisions of the law. New tax reform legislation enacted on December 22, 2017 (“Tax Reform ~~Law repealed~~Law”) includes a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the ~~individual mandate~~tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the Affordable Care Act on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate,” which could lead to fewer enrollments in ~~health care~~healthcare exchanges. ~~It is unclear whether further changes that President Trump has planned to the Affordable Care Act will be enacted, or if enacted changes will affect Faneuil’s business.~~ Further significant changes to, or repeal of, the Affordable Care Act could materially and adversely affect that aspect of Faneuil’s business.

Economic downturns, ~~and~~ reductions in government funding and other program-related and contract-related risks could have a negative effect on Faneuil’s business.

Demand for the services offered by Faneuil has been, and is expected to continue to be, subject to significant fluctuations due to a variety of factors beyond its control, including economic ~~conditions.~~conditions, particularly since contracts for major programs are performed over extended periods of time. During economic downturns, the ability of both private and governmental entities to make expenditures may decline significantly. We cannot be certain that economic or political conditions will be generally favorable or that there will not be significant fluctuations adversely affecting Faneuil’~~s industry~~ as a whole, or key industry segments targeted by Faneuil. In addition, ~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s operations are, in part, dependent upon state government funding. Significant changes in the level of state government funding, ~~could have an unfavorable effect on Faneuil~~’~~s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.~~

~~Faneuil’s business involves many program-related and contract-related risks.~~

~~Faneuil~~’s business is subject to a variety of program-related risks, including changes in political and other circumstances, particularly since contracts for major programs are performed over extended periods of time. These risks include changes in personnel at government authorities, the failure of applicable government authorities to take necessary actions, opposition by third parties to particular programs, and the failure by customers to obtain adequate financing for particular programs. Due to these factors, losses on a particular contract or contracts could occur, and Faneuil could experience significant changes in operating results on a quarterly or annual basis.

~~Delays in the government budget process or a government shutdown may adversely affect Faneuil’s cash flows and operating results.~~

~~Faneuil derives a significant portion of its revenue from state government contracts and programs. Any~~any delay in the state government budget process or a state government shutdown ~~may result in Faneuil~~’~~s incurrence of substantial labor or other costs without reimbursement under customer contracts, or the delay or cancellation of key programs in which Faneuil is involved, which~~ could ~~materially adversely affect Faneuil~~’~~s cash flows and operating results.~~

~~Faneuil faces intense competition. If Faneuil does not compete effectively, its business may suffer.~~

~~Faneuil faces intense competition from numerous competitors. Faneuil primarily competes~~have an unfavorable effect on the basis of quality, performance, innovation, technology, price, applications expertise, system and service flexibility, and established customer service capabilities, as its services relate to toll collection, customer contact centers, and employee staffing. Faneuil may not be able to compete effectively on all of these fronts or with all of its competitors. In addition, new competitors may emerge, and service offerings may be threatened by new technologies or market trends that reduce the value of the services Faneuil provides. To remain competitive, Faneuil must respond to new technologies and enhance its existing services, and we anticipate that it may have to adjust the pricing for its services to stay competitive on future responses to proposals. If Faneuil does not compete effectively, itsFaneuil’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash ~~flows~~flows.

Faneuil’s profitability is dependent in part on Faneuil’s ability to estimate correctly, obtain adequate pricing, and control its cost structure related to fixed “price per call” contracts.

A significant portion of Faneuil’s revenues are derived from commercial and government contracts awarded through competitive bidding processes. Many of these contracts are extremely complex and require the investment of significant resources in order to prepare accurate bids and pricing based on both current and future conditions, such as the cost of labor, that could impact profitability of such contracts. Our success depends on Faneuil’s ability to (i) accurately estimate the resources and costs that will be required to implement and service any contracts we are awarded, sometimes in advance of the final determination of such contracts’ full scope and design, and (ii) negotiate adequate pricing for call center services that provide a reasonable return to our shareholders based on such estimates. Additionally, in order to attract and retain certain contracts, we are sometimes required to make significant capital and other investments to enable us to perform our services under those contracts, such as facility leases, information technology equipment purchases, labor resources, and costs incurred to develop and implement software. If Faneuil is unable to accurately estimate its costs to provide call center services, obtain adequate pricing, or control costs for fixed “price per call” contracts, it could materially adversely ~~affected.~~affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Faneuil’s dependence on a small number of customers could adversely affect its business or results of operations.

Faneuil derives a substantial portion of its revenue from a relatively small number of customers. For additional information regarding Faneuil’s customer concentrations, see “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 4.5. Concentration Risks.”We expect ~~that~~the largest

customers of Faneuil’~~s largest customers will~~ to continue to account for a substantial portion of its total net revenue for the foreseeable future. Faneuil has long-standing relationships with many of its significant customers. However, because Faneuil’s customers generally contract for specific projects or programs with a finite duration, Faneuil may lose these customers if funding for their respective programs is discontinued, or if their projects end and the contracts are not renewed or replaced. The loss or reduction of, or failure to renew or replace, any significant contracts with any of these customers could materially reduce Faneuil’s revenue and cash flows. Additionally, many of Faneuil’s customers are government entities, which can unilaterally terminate or modify the existing contracts with Faneuil without cause and penalty to such government entities in many situations. If Faneuil does not replace them with other customers or other programs, the loss of business from any one of such customers could have a material adverse effect on its business or results of operations.

~~Faneuil’s ability to recover~~The recovery of capital investments in ~~connection with its~~Faneuil contracts is subject to risk.

In order to attract and retain large outsourcing contracts, Faneuil ~~sometimes makes~~may be required to make significant capital investments to perform its services under the contract, such as purchases of information technology equipment and costs incurred to develop and implement software. The net book value of such assets, including ~~a portion of Faneuil~~’s intangible assets, could be impaired, and Faneuil’s earnings and cash flow could be materially adversely affected in the event of the early termination of all or a part of such a contract, reduction in volumes and services thereunder for reasons including, but not limited to, a client’s merger or acquisition, divestiture of assets or businesses, business failure or deterioration, or a client’s exercise of contract termination rights.

~~Faneuil’s business could be adversely affected if Faneuil’s clients are not satisfied with its services.~~

~~Faneuil~~’~~s business model depends in large part on its ability to attract new work from its base of existing clients. Faneuil~~’~~s business model also depends on relationships it develops with its clients with respect to understanding its clients~~’ needs and delivering solutions that are tailored to those needs. If a client is not satisfied with the quality of work performed by Faneuil or a subcontractor or with the type of services or solutions delivered, Faneuil could incur additional costs to address the situation, the profitability of that work might be impaired and the client’~~s dissatisfaction with Faneuil~~’~~s services could lead to the termination of that work or damage Faneuil~~’~~s ability to obtain additional work from that client. Also, negative publicity related to Faneuil~~’~~s client relationships, regardless of its accuracy, may further damage Faneuil~~’~~s business by affecting its ability to compete for new contracts with current and prospective clients.~~

Faneuil’s dependence on subcontractors and equipment manufacturers could adversely affect it.

In some cases, Faneuil relies on and partners with third-party subcontractors as well as third-party equipment manufacturers to provide services under its contracts. To the extent that Faneuil cannot engage subcontractors or acquire equipment or materials, ~~Faneuil~~’~~s ability to perform~~its performance, according to the terms of ~~its contracts with its customers~~the customer contract, may be impaired. If the amount Faneuil is required to pay for subcontracted services or equipment exceeds the amount Faneuil has estimated in bidding for fixed prices or fixed unit price contracts, it could experience reduced profit or losses in the performance of these contracts with its customers. Also, if a subcontractor or a manufacturer is unable to deliver its services, equipment, or materials according to the negotiated terms for any reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition, Faneuil may be required to purchase the services, equipment or materials from another source at a higher price. This may reduce the expected profit or result in a loss of a customer contract for which the services, equipment or materials were needed.

~~Faneuil’s dependence on~~Partnerships entered into by Faneuil as a subcontractor with third parties who are primary contractors could adversely affect its ability to secure new projects and derive a profit from its existing projects.

In some cases, Faneuil partners as a subcontractor with third parties who are the primary contractors. In these cases, Faneuil is largely dependent on the judgments of the primary contractors in bidding for new projects and negotiating the primary contracts, including establishing the scope of services and service levels to be provided. Furthermore, even if projects are secured, if a primary contractor is unable to deliver its services according to the negotiated terms of the primary contract for any reason, including the deterioration of its financial condition, the customer may terminate or modify the primary contract, which may reduce Faneuil’s profit or cause losses in the performance of the contract. In certain instances, the subcontract agreement includes a “Pay When Paid” provision, which allows the primary contractor to hold back payments to a subcontractor until they are paid by the customer, which has negatively impacted ~~Faneuil’s~~Faneuil cashflow.

If Faneuil or a primary contractor guarantees to a customer the timely implementation or performance standards of a program, Faneuil could incur additional costs to meet its guaranteed obligations or liquidated damages if it fails to perform as agreed.

In certain instances, Faneuil or its primary contractor guarantees a customer that it will implement a program by a scheduled date. At times, they also provide that the program will achieve or adhere to certain performance standards or key performance indicators. Although Faneuil generally provides input to its primary contractors regarding the scope of services and service levels to be provided, it is possible that a primary contractor may make commitments without ~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s input or approval. If Faneuil or the primary contractor subsequently fails to implement the program as scheduled, or if the program subsequently fails to meet the guaranteed performance standards, Faneuil may be held responsible for costs to the client resulting from any delay in implementation, or the costs incurred by the program to achieve the performance standards. In most cases where Faneuil or the primary contractor fails to meet contractually defined performance standards, Faneuil may be subject to agreed-upon liquidated damages. To the extent that these events occur, the total costs for ~~the~~such program ~~would~~may exceed ~~Faneuil~~’s original estimates, and ~~it could experience~~cause reduced profits, or in some cases a loss for that program.

Data security and integrity are critically important to our business, and cybersecurity incidents, including cyberattacks, cyber-fraud, breaches of security, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential information, business disruption, or the perception that confidential information is ~~necessary for~~not secure, could result in a material loss of business, regulatory enforcement, substantial legal liability and/or significant harm to our reputation.

Our business involves the use, storage, and transmission of information about our clients, their customers, and our employees. While we take reasonable measures to protect the security of and unauthorized access to our systems and the privacy of personal and proprietary information that we access and store, our security controls over our systems may not be adequate to prevent the improper access to or disclosure of this information. Such unauthorized access or disclosure could subject Faneuil to ~~win new contracts.~~

~~In line with industry practice, Faneuil is often required, primarily in its toll~~significant liability under relevant law or our contracts and transportation programs, to provide performance and surety bonds to customers in conjunction with its contracts. These bonds indemnify the customer should Faneuil fail to perform its obligations under the contracts. If a bond is required for a particular program and Faneuil is unable to obtain an appropriate bond, Faneuil cannot pursue that program. The issuance of a bond is at the surety’s sole discretion. Moreover, due to events that affect the insurance and bonding markets generally, bonding may be more difficult to obtain in the future or may only be available at significant additional costs. There can be no assurance that bonds will continue to be available on reasonable terms, or at all. Any inability to obtain adequate bonding and, as a result, to bid on new work could harm ~~Faneuil~~’~~s business.~~our reputation, resulting in impacts on our results of operations, loss of future revenue and business opportunities. These risks may further increase as our business model includes a high percentage of work from home delivery in addition to our delivery through customer experience centers.

~~Interruption~~We operate in an environment of ~~Faneuil’s data centers and customer contact centers could negatively impact Faneuil’s business.~~

~~If Faneuil were to experience a temporary~~significant risk of cybersecurity incidents resulting from unintentional events or ~~permanent interruption at~~deliberate attacks by third parties or insiders, which may involve exploiting highly obscure security vulnerabilities or sophisticated attack methods. These cyberattacks can take many forms, but they typically have one or more of ~~Faneuil~~’sthe following objectives, among others:

In recent years, there have been an increasing number of high-profile security breaches at companies and government agencies, and security experts have warned about the growing risks of hackers, cybercriminals and state actors launching a broad range of attacks targeting information technology systems. Information security breaches, computer viruses, interruption or loss of business data, orDDoS (distributed denial of service) attacks, ransomware and other cyberattacks on any of these systems could disrupt our normal operations of customer ~~contact~~engagement centers ~~due to natural disaster, casualty, operating malfunction, cyber-attack, sabotage or any other cause, Faneuil might be unable to provide the~~and remote service delivery, our cloud platform offerings, and our enterprise services, it is contractually obligated to deliver. This could result in Faneuil being required to pay contractual damages to some clients or to allow some clients to terminate or renegotiate their contracts. Notwithstanding disaster recovery and business continuity plans and precautions instituted to protect Faneuil’~~s clients and Faneuil from events that could interrupt delivery of services, there is no guarantee that such interruptions would not result in a prolonged interruption in Faneuil~~’simpeding our ability to provide critical services to ~~its clients or~~our clients. For example, on August 18, 2021, we detected a ransomware attack (the “Security Event”) that accessed and encrypted certain files on certain servers utilized by us in the provision of our call center services. Although we quickly and actively managed the Security Event, such ~~precautions would adequately compensate Faneuil for any losses it may incur~~event caused disruption to parts of our business, including certain aspects of our provision of call center services. Although we actively communicated with customers and worked to minimize disruption, we cannot guarantee that customer relationships were not harmed as a result of the Security Event.

We are experiencing an increase in frequency of cyber-fraud attempts, such ~~interruptions.~~as so-called “social engineering” attacks and phishing scams, which typically seek unauthorized money transfers or information disclosure. We actively train our employees to recognize these attacks and have implemented proactive risk mitigation measures to identify and to attempt to prevent these attacks. There are no assurances, however, that these attacks, which are growing in sophistication, may not deceive our employees, resulting in a material loss.

While we have taken reasonable measures to protect our systems and processes from unauthorized intrusions and cyber-fraud, we cannot be certain that advances in cyber-criminal capabilities, discovery of new system vulnerabilities, and attempts to exploit such vulnerabilities will not compromise or breach the technology protecting our systems and the information that we manage and control, which could result in damage to our systems, our business, our reputation, and our profitability.

We cannot assure you that our systems, databases and services will not be compromised or disrupted in the future, whether as a result of deliberate attacks by malicious actors, breaches due to employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events. We work to monitor and develop our information technology networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact.

The preventive actions we take to address cybersecurity risk, including protection of our systems and networks, may be insufficient to repel or mitigate the effects of cyberattacks in the future as it may not always be possible to anticipate, detect or recognize threats to our systems, or to implement effective preventive measures against all cybersecurity risks. This is because, among other things:

~~Any~~Unauthorized disclosure, loss or corruption of our data or inability of our clients and their customers to access our systems could disrupt our operations, subject us to substantial regulatory and legal proceedings and potential liability, result in a material loss of business and/or significantly harm our reputation.

We may not be able to immediately address the consequences of a cybersecurity incident because a successful breach of our computer systems, software, networks or other technology assets could occur and persist for an extended period of time before being detected due to, among other things:

The extent of a particular cybersecurity incident and the steps that we may need to take to investigate it may not be immediately clear, and it may take a significant amount of time before such an investigation can be completed and full and reliable information about the incident is known. While such an investigation is ongoing, we may not necessarily know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, any or all of which could further increase the costs and consequences of a cybersecurity incident.

Due to concerns about data security and integrity, a growing number of legislative and regulatory bodies have adopted consumer notification and other requirements in the event that consumer information is accessed by unauthorized persons and additional regulations regarding the use, access, accuracy and security of such data are possible. In the United States, we are subject to federal and state laws that provide for disparate notification regimes. In the event of unauthorized access, our failure to comply with the complexities of these various regulations could subject us to regulatory scrutiny and additional liability.

If our cloud platforms and third-party software and systems experience disruptions due to ~~political instability, armed hostilities,~~technology failures or cyberattacks and ~~acts~~if we fail to correct such impacts promptly, our business will be materially impacted.

Our cloud platforms and third-party software and systems that we use to serve our clients are complex and may, from time to time have service interruptions, contain design defects, configuration or coding errors, and other vulnerabilities that may be difficult to detect or correct, and which may be outside of ~~terrorism~~our control. We may not have sufficient redundant operations to cover a loss or ~~natural disasters~~failure of our systems in a timely manner. Any significant interruption could severely harm our business and reputation and result in a loss of revenue and clients. Although our commercial agreements limit our exposure from such occurrences, they may not always effectively protect us against claims in all jurisdictions and against third-party claims. If our clients’ business is damaged, our reputation could suffer, we could be subject to contract termination and payments for damages, adversely ~~affect Faneuil’s~~affecting our business, our reputation, our results of operations and financial ~~performance.~~condition.

If ~~terrorist activities, armed conflicts, political instability~~we fail to maintain and improve our systems, demand for our services could be adversely affected.

In our markets, there are continuous improvements in computer hardware, network operating systems and technologies. These improvements, as well as changes in client preferences or ~~natural disasters occur~~regulatory requirements, may require changes in the ~~United States~~technology used to gather and process our data and deliver our services. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to:

We cannot provide assurance that we will successfully implement new technologies, cause our cloud platforms and third-party software and systems providers to implement compatible technologies or ~~other locations, such events may negatively affect Faneuil~~’~~s operations,~~adapt our technology to evolving customer, regulatory and competitive requirements. If we fail to respond or fail to cause ~~general economic conditions~~our cloud platforms and third-party software and systems providers to ~~deteriorate~~respond, to changes in technology, regulatory requirements or ~~cause demand for Faneuil~~’~~s services, many of which depend on travel, to decline. A prolonged economic slowdown or recession could reduce~~client preferences, the demand for ~~Faneuil~~’sour services, ~~and consequently, negatively~~the delivery of our services or our market reputation could be adversely affected. Additionally, our failure to implement important updates could affect ~~Faneuil~~’~~s future sales and profits. Any~~our ability to successfully meet the timeline for us to generate cost savings resulting from our investments in improved technology. Failure to achieve any of these ~~events could have a significant effect on Faneuil~~’~~s business,~~objectives would impede our ability to deliver strong financial ~~condition or results of operations.~~results.

~~Faneuil’s~~Faneuil’s business is subject to many regulatory requirements, and current or future regulation could significantly increase ~~Faneuil’s~~Faneuil’s cost of doing business.

~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s business is subject to many laws and regulatory requirements in the United States, covering such matters as data privacy, consumer protection, ~~health care~~healthcare requirements, labor relations, taxation, internal and disclosure control obligations, governmental affairs and immigration. For example, Faneuil is subject to state and federal laws and regulations regarding the protection of consumer information commonly referred to as “~~non-public~~“non-public personal information.” For instance, the collection of patient data through ~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s contact center services is subject to ~~the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, commonly known as~~ HIPAA, which protects the privacy of ~~patients~~’patients’ data. These laws, regulations, and agreements require Faneuil to develop and implement policies to protect non-public personal information and to disclose these policies to consumers before a customer relationship is established and periodically after that. These laws, regulations, and agreements limit ~~Faneuil~~’sthe ability to use or disclose non-public personal information for purposes other than the ones originally intended. Many of these regulations, including those related to data privacy, are frequently changing and sometimes conflict with existing ones among the various jurisdictions in which Faneuil provides services. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in ~~Faneuil~~’s liability for damages, fines, criminal prosecution, unfavorable publicity, and restrictions placed on Faneuil’~~s ability to operate. Faneuil~~’s operations. Faneuil’s failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to ~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s reputation in the marketplace, which could have a material adverse effect on ~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, because a substantial portion of Faneuil’s operating costs consists of labor costs, changes in governmental regulations relating to wages, healthcare and healthcare reform and other benefits or employment taxes could have a material adverse effect on ~~Faneuil~~’sFaneuil’s business, results of operations, or financial condition.

~~A failure~~Matters relating to ~~attract~~employment and ~~retain necessary personnel, skilled management,~~labor laws and ~~qualified subcontractors~~prevailing wage standards may ~~have an adverse impact on Faneuil’s~~adversely affect our business.

~~Because~~The industries in which Faneuil ~~operates in intensely competitive markets,~~competes is labor intensive and governed by various federal and state labor laws with respect to its ~~success depends to a significant extent upon~~relationship with its employees. Faneuil’s ability to ~~attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and~~meet its labor needs on a cost-effective basis is subject to numerous external factors, including the availability of qualified personnel in the workforce in the local markets in which it operates, unemployment levels within those markets, prevailing wage rates, health and other insurance costs and changes in employment and labor laws. Such laws related to ~~subcontract with qualified, competent subcontractors. If~~employee hours, wages, job classification and benefits could significantly increase Faneuil’s operating costs. Faneuil ~~fails~~is also subject to ~~attract, develop, motivate, retain,~~employee claims against it based on such laws and ~~effectively utilize personnel with~~other actions or inactions of its employees. Some or all of these claims may give rise to litigation, including class action litigation under the ~~desired levels~~Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour lawsuits. Such class action lawsuits are typically brought by specialized plaintiff law firms who often seek large settlements based entirely on the number of ~~training~~potential plaintiffs in a class, whether or ~~experience, or is unable to contract with qualified, competent subcontractors, Faneuil~~’~~s business will be harmed. Experienced and capable personnel remain in high demand, and~~not there is ~~continual competition~~any basis for the claims that they make on behalf of their ~~talents. Additionally, regarding~~clients, most of whom do not believe themselves to be aggrieved nor seek recourse until solicited. Due to the ~~labor-intensive business~~inherent uncertainties of ~~Faneuil, quality service depends on Faneuil~~’s ability to retain employees and control personnel turnover. Any increase in the employee turnover rate could increase recruiting and training costs and could decrease operating effectiveness and productivity.litigation, Faneuil may not be able to ~~continue~~accurately determine the impact on it of any future adverse outcome of such proceedings. The ultimate resolution of these matters could have a material adverse impact on Faneuil’s financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity. In addition, regardless of the outcome, these proceedings could result in substantial cost to Faneuil and may require Faneuil to devote substantial resources to defend itself.

Additionally, in the event prevailing wage rates increase in the local markets in which Faneuil operates, Faneuil may be required to concurrently increase the wages paid to its employees to maintain the quality of its workforce and customer service. To the extent such increases are not covered by our customers, Faneuil’s profit margins may decrease as a result. If Faneuil is unable to hire ~~train~~and retain employees capable of meeting its business needs and expectations, its business and brand image may be impaired. Any failure to meet Faneuil’s staffing needs or any material increase in turnover rates of its employees may adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, Faneuil relies on the ability to attract and retain labor on a cost-effective basis. The availability of labor in the local markets in which Faneuil operates has declined in recent years and competition for such labor has increased, especially under the economic crises experienced throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Faneuil’s ability to attract and retain a sufficient ~~number~~workforce on a cost-effective basis

depends on several factors discussed above, including the ~~skills, experience, and performance of members of Faneuil~~’~~s senior management team. Despite executing an employment agreement with Faneuil~~’~~s CEO, she or other members of~~ability to protect staff during the ~~management team may discontinue service with Faneuil and~~COVID-19 pandemic. Faneuil may not be able to ~~find individuals to replace them at the same cost, or at all. Faneuil has not obtained~~ “~~key person~~” ~~insurance for any member of its senior management team. The loss or interruption of the services of any key employee or the loss of~~attract and retain a ~~key subcontractor relationship could hurt Faneuil~~’~~s business, financial condition, cash flow, results of operations and prospects.~~

~~The floor covering industry is highly dependent~~sufficient workforce on national and regional economic conditions, such as consumer confidence and income, corporate and individual spending, interest rate levels, availability of credit and demand for housing. A decline in residential or commercial construction activity or remodeling and refurbishment in Las Vegas could have a ~~material adverse effect on our business.~~

The floor covering industry is highly dependent on construction activity, including new construction, which is cyclical in nature and recently experienced a downturn. The downturn in the U.S. and global economies, along with the residential and commercial markets in such economies, particularly in Las Vegas, negatively impacted the floor covering industry and Carpets’ business. Although the impact of a decline in new construction activity is typically accompanied by an increase in remodeling and replacement activity, these activities lagged during the downturn. Although these difficult economic conditions have improved, there may be additional downturns that could cause the industry to deterioratecost-effective basis in the future. ~~A significant or prolonged~~In the event of increased costs of attracting and retaining a workforce, Faneuil’s profit margins may decline as a result.

The industries in ~~residential/commercial remodeling or new construction activity could have a material adverse effect on the Company~~’~~s business and results of operations.~~

~~Carpets faces intense competition in the floor covering industry that~~which Faneuil operates are highly competitive, which could decrease demand for ~~its~~Faneuil’s products or force itFaneuil to lower its prices, which could have a material adverse effect on Faneuil’s business and our ~~business.~~financial results.

~~The floor covering industry is highly competitive. Carpets~~Faneuil primarily competes ~~with a number of home improvement stores, building materials supply houses~~based on quality, performance, innovation, technology, price, applications expertise, system and ~~lumber yards, specialty design stores, showrooms, discount stores, local, regional~~service flexibility, and national hardware stores, mail order firms, warehouse clubs, independent building supply stores and other retailers, as well as with installers. Also, it faces growing competition from online and multichannel retailersestablished customer service capabilities, as its ~~customers increasingly use computers, tablets, smartphones~~services relate to customer contact centers, and ~~other mobile devices~~employee staffing. Faneuil may not be able to ~~shop online and compare prices and products in real time. Intense competitive~~compete effectively on all these fronts or with all of its competitors.

Competitive pressures ~~from one~~ or ~~more of Carpets~~’ ~~competitors or its~~the inability by Faneuil to adapt effectively and quickly to a changing competitive landscape could affect ~~its~~ prices, ~~its~~ margins or demand for ~~its~~ products and services. If it is unable to respond timely and appropriately to these competitive pressures, including through maintaining competitive locations of stores, customer service, quality and price of merchandise and services, in-stock levels, and merchandise assortment and presentation, its market share and its financial performance could be adversely affected.

Carpets may not timely identify or effectively respond to consumer needs, expectations or trends, which could adversely affect its relationship with customers, its reputation, demand for its products and services and its market share.

~~Carpets operates in a market sector where demand is strongly influenced by rapidly changing customer preferences as to product design and features. Carpets~~’ success depends on its ability to anticipate and react to changing consumer demands promptly. All of its products are subject to changing consumer preferences that cannot be predicted with certainty. Also, long lead times for certain of its products may make it hard for it to respond quickly to changes in consumer demands. Consumer preferences could shift rapidly to different types of products or away from the types of products Carpets carries altogether, and its future success depends, in part, on its ability to anticipate and respond to these changes. Failure to anticipate and respond promptly to changing consumer preferences could lead to, among other things, lower sales and excess inventory levels, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.

Carpets relies on third-party suppliers for its products. If it fails to identify and develop relationships with a sufficient number of qualified suppliers, or if its suppliers experience financial or operational difficulties, its ability to timely and efficiently access products that meet its standards could be adversely affected.

Carpets sources, stocks and sells products from vendors, and its ability to fulfill their orders reliably and efficiently is critical to its business success. Its ability to continue to identify and develop relationships with qualified suppliers who can satisfy its standards for quality and the need to access products in a timely, efficient and cost-effective manner is a significant challenge. Carpets’ ~~ability to access products can also be adversely affected by political instability, the financial instability of suppliers, suppliers~~’ noncompliance with applicable laws, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, supply disruptions, weather conditions, natural disasters, shipping or logistical interruptions or costs and other factors beyond its control. If these vendors fail or are unable to perform as expected and Carpets is unable to replace them quickly, its business could be adversely affected, at least temporarily, until it can do so, and potentially, in some cases, permanently.

Failure to achieve and maintain a high level of product and service quality could damage Carpets’ image with customers and negatively impact its sales, profitability, cashflows, and financial condition.

~~Product and service quality issues could result in a negative impact on customer confidence in Carpets and the Carpets brand image. As a result, Carpets~~’ reputation as a retailer of high-quality products and services could suffer and impact customer loyalty. Additionally, a decline in product and service quality could result in product recalls, product liability and warranty claims. Carpets generally provides a one-year warranty on the installation of any of its products. Warranty work related directly to installation is repaired at the cost to Carpets, and product defects are generally charged back to the manufacturer.

~~If Carpets is unable to manage its installation service business effectively, it could suffer lost sales and be subject to fines, lawsuits, and a damaged reputation.~~

Carpets acts as a general contractor to provide installation services to its customers. As such, it is subject to regulatory requirements and risks applicable to general contractors, which include management of licensing, permitting and the quality of its installers. If Carpets fails to effectively manage these processes or provide proper oversight of these services, it could suffer lost sales, fines and lawsuits, as well as damage to its reputation, which could adversely affect its business.

A portion of Carpets’ business is dependent on estimating fixed price projects correctly and completing the installations within budget. Carpets could suffer losses associated with installations on fixed price projects.

~~A portion of Carpets~~’ business consists of fixed price projects that are bid for and contracted based on estimated costs. The estimating process includes budgeting for the appropriate amount of materials, labor and overhead. At times, this work can be substantial and as a result Carpets’ ability to estimate costs correctly and its ability to complete the project within budget or satisfaction without material defect is essential. If Carpets is unable to estimate a project properly or unable to complete the project within budget or without material defect, it may suffer losses, which could adversely affect its reputation, business, and financial condition.

~~Carpets’ success depends upon its ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified associates while also controlling its labor costs.~~

~~Carpets~~’ customers expect a high level of customer service and product knowledge from its associates. To meet the needs and expectations of its customers, it must attract, train and retain a large number of highly qualified associates while at the same time controlling labor costs. Its ability to control labor costs is subject to numerous external factors, including prevailing wage rates and health and other insurance costs, as well as the impact of legislation or regulations governing labor relations or healthcare benefits. Also, Carpets competes with other retail businesses for many of its associates in hourly positions, and it invests significant resources in training and motivating them to maintain a high level of job satisfaction. These positions have historically had high turnover rates, which can lead to increased training and retention costs. There is no assurance that Carpets will be able to attract or retain highly qualified associates in the future.

~~A substantial decrease or interruption in business from Carpets’ significant customers or suppliers could adversely affect its business.~~

A small number of customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of Carpets net revenue. We expect that key customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of Carpets net revenue for the foreseeable future. However, Carpets may lose these customers due to pricing, quality or other various issues. The loss or reduction of, or failure to renew or replace, any significant contracts with any of these customers could have a material adverse effect on its business or results of operations. For additional information regarding customer concentrations, see ~~“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 4. Concentration Risks.”~~

Historically, Carpets has purchased inventory from a small number of vendors. If these vendors became unable to provide materials promptly, Carpets would be required to find alternative vendors. Management estimates they could locate and qualify new vendors in approximately two weeks. For additional information regarding vendor concentrations, see ~~“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 4. Concentration Risks.”~~

~~Phoenix faces intense competition in the printing industry that could decrease demand for its products or force it to lower prices.~~

The printing industry is highly competitive. Phoenix competes directly or indirectly with a number of established book and book component manufacturers. New distribution channels such as digital formats, the internet and online retailers and growing delivery platforms (~~e.g~~., tablets and e-readers), combined with the concentration of retailer power, pose threats and provide opportunities to traditional consumer publishing models, potentially impacting both sales volumes and pricing.

C~~ompetitive pressures or the inability to adapt effectively and quickly to a changing competitive landscape could affect Phoenix~~’~~s prices, its margins or demand for its products and services. If Phoenix~~Faneuil is unable to respond timely and appropriately to these competitive pressures, from existing or new competitors, its business, market share and financial performance could be adversely affected.

Economic weakness and uncertainty, as well as the effects of these conditions on Phoenix’s customers and suppliers, could reduce demand for or Phoenix’s ability to provide its products and services.

~~Economic conditions and, in particular, conditions in Phoenix~~’~~s customers~~’ ~~and suppliers~~’ businesses, could affect its business and results of operations. Phoenix has experienced and may continue to experience reduced demand for certain of its products and services. As a result of uncertainty about global economic conditions, including factors such as unemployment, bankruptcies, financial market volatility, sovereign debt issues, government budget deficits and other factors which continue to affect the global economy, Phoenix’s customers and suppliers may experience further deterioration of their businesses, suffer cash flow shortages or file for bankruptcy. In turn, existing or potential customers may delay or decline to purchase Phoenix’~~s products and related services, and Phoenix~~’~~s suppliers and customers may not be able to fulfill their obligations to it in a timely fashion.~~

~~Phoenix~~’s educational textbook cover and component sales depend on continued government funding for educational spending, which impacts demand by its customers, and may be affected by changes in or continued restrictions on local, state and/or federal funding and school budgets. As a result, a reduction in consumer discretionary spending or disposable income and/or adverse trends in the general economy (and consumer perceptions of those trends) may affect Phoenix more significantly than other businesses in other industries.

~~In addition, customer difficulties could result in increases in bad debt write-offs and increases to Phoenix~~’~~s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. Further, Phoenix~~’s suppliers may experience similar conditions as its customers, which may impact their viability and their ability to fulfill their obligations to it. Negative changes in these or related economic factors could materially adversely affect Phoenix’~~s business.~~

~~A substantial decrease or interruption in business from Phoenix’s significant customers or suppliers could adversely affect its business.~~

~~Phoenix has significant customer and supplier concentration. For additional information regarding customer and supplier concentrations, see~~ ~~“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 4. Concentration Risks.”~~ Any significant cancellation, deferral or reduction in the quantity or type of products sold to these principal customers or a significant number of smaller customers, including as a result of our failure to perform, the impact of economic weakness and challenges to their businesses, a change in buying habits, further industry consolidation or the impact of the shift to alternative methods of content delivery, including digital distribution and printing, to customers, could have a material adverse effect on Phoenix’~~s business. Further, if Phoenix~~’~~s major customers, in turn, are not able to secure large orders, they will not be able to place orders with Phoenix. A substantial decrease or interruption in business from Phoenix~~’~~s significant customers could result in write-offs or the loss of future business and could have a material adverse effect on Phoenix~~’~~s business.~~

Additionally, Phoenix purchases certain limited grades of paper for the production of their book and component products. If our suppliers reduce their supplies or discontinue these grades of paper, we may be unable to fulfill our contract obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on Phoenix’~~s business.~~ ~~“Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 4. Concentration Risks.”~~

~~Fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials could increase Phoenix’s cost of sales.~~

Phoenix is dependent upon the availability of raw materials to produce its products. Phoenix primarily uses paper, ink, and adhesives, and the price and availability of these raw materials are affected by numerous factors beyond Phoenix’~~s control. These factors include:~~

~~Any material increase in the price of key raw materials could adversely impact Phoenix~~’~~s cost of sales or result in the loss of availability of such materials at reasonable prices. When these fluctuations result in significantly higher raw material costs, Phoenix~~’s operating results are adversely affected to the extent it is unable to pass on these increased costs to its customers or to the extent they materially affect customer buying habits. Significant fluctuations in prices for paper, ink, and adhesives could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on Phoenix’~~s business.~~

~~Any disruption at Phoenix’s production facility could adversely affect its results of operations.~~

Phoenix is dependent on certain key production facilities and certain specialized machines. Any disruption of production capabilities due to unforeseen events, including mechanical failures, labor disturbances, weather or other force majeure events, at any of its principal facilities could adversely affect its business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Further, if any of the specialized equipment that Phoenix relies upon to make its products becomes inoperable, Phoenix may experience delays in its ability to fulfill customer orders, which could harm its relationships with its customers.

~~Phoenix is subject to environmental obligations and liabilities that could impose substantial costs upon Phoenix.~~

~~Phoenix~~’s operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing emissions to air, discharge to water, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and other materials, and employee health and safety matters. As an owner and operator of real property and a generator of hazardous substances, Phoenix may be subject to environmental cleanup liability, regardless of fault, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act or analogous state laws, as well as to claims for harm to health or property or for natural resource damages arising out of contamination or exposure to hazardous substances. Some of Phoenix’s current or past operations have involved metalworking and plating, printing and other activities that have resulted in or could result in environmental conditions giving rise to liabilities. If Phoenix incurs significant expenses related to environmental cleanup or damages stemming from harm or alleged harm to health, property or natural resources arising from contamination or exposure to hazardous substances, Phoenix’~~s business may be materially and adversely affected.~~

~~The diversion of resources and management’s attention to the integrations of the Printing Components Business and Color Optics could adversely affect Phoenix’s day-to-day business.~~

The integrations of the Printing Components Business and Color Optics may place a significant burden on Phoenix’s management and internal resources. The diversion of Phoenix management’s attention away from day-to-day business concerns and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could adversely affect Phoenix’s financial results.

~~Phoenix may not be able to successfully integrate recently acquired businesses, and the anticipated benefits of the recently acquired businesses may not be realized.~~

Phoenix has completed multiple acquisitions with the expectation that such acquisitions would result in various benefits, including, among other things, complementing Phoenix’s current product offerings and allowing Phoenix to expand and diversify its product offerings by leveraging its existing core competencies. Achieving those anticipated benefits is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether Phoenix can integrate the acquired businesses in an efficient and effective manner. The integration process could also take longer than Phoenix anticipates and could result in the loss of valuable employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses, processes and systems or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, policies and compensation arrangements, any of which could adversely affect Phoenix’s ability to achieve the benefits it anticipates.

~~Our ability to engage in some business transactions may be limited by the terms of our debt.~~

~~Our financing documents contain affirmative and negative financial covenants restricting ALJ, Faneuil, Carpets, and Phoenix. Specifically, our loan facilities include covenants restricting ALJ~~’~~s, Faneuil~~’~~s, Carpets~~’ ~~and Phoenix~~’~~s ability to:~~

~~ALJ~~’~~s, Faneuil~~’~~s, Carpets~~’ ~~and Phoenix~~’~~s respective abilities to borrow under our loan arrangements depend upon their respective abilities to comply with certain covenants and borrowing base requirements. Our and our subsidiaries~~’ abilities to meet these covenants and requirements may be affected by events beyond our control, and we or they may not meet these obligations. The failure of any of us or our subsidiaries to comply with these covenants and requirements could result in an event of default under our loan arrangements that, if not cured or waived, could terminate such party’s ability to borrow further, permit acceleration of the relevant debt (and other indebtedness based on cross-default provisions) and permit foreclosure on any collateral granted as security under the loan arrangements, which includes substantially all of our assets. Accordingly, any default under our loan facilities could also result in a material adverse effect on us that may result in our lenders seeking to recover from us or against our assets. There can also be no assurance that the lenders will grant waivers on covenant violations if they occur. Any such event of default would have a material adverse effect on us.

~~We have substantial indebtedness and our ability to generate cash to service our indebtedness depends on factors that are beyond our control.~~

We currently have, and will likely continue to have, a substantial amount of indebtedness, some of which require us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. Our indebtedness could, among other things, make it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt obligations, require us to use a large portion of our cash flow from operations to repay and service our debt or otherwise create liquidity problems, limit our flexibility to adjust to market conditions and place us at a competitive disadvantage. We expect to obtain the money to pay our expenses and pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness from cash flow from our operations and potentially from debt or equity offerings. However, in the event that we do not have sufficient funds to repay the debt at maturity of these loans, we will need to refinance this debt. If the credit environment is constrained at the time the balloon payment is due or our indebtedness otherwise matures, we may not be able to refinance our existing indebtedness on acceptable terms and may be forced to choose from a number of unfavorable options. These options include agreeing to otherwise unfavorable financing terms, selling assets on disadvantageous terms or defaulting on the loan and permitting the lender to foreclose. Accordingly, our ability to meet our obligations depends on our future performance and capital raising activities, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. If our cash flow and capital resources prove inadequate to allow us to pay the principal and interest on our debt and meet our other obligations, our ability to execute our business plan and effectively compete in the marketplace may be materially adversely affected.

We are subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business that could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and settlements or judgments, require significant amounts of management attention and result in the diversion of significant operational resources, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We, our officers, and our subsidiaries, are currently involved in, and from time to time may become involved in, legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Our subsidiaries Carpets and Faneuil have each been named in lawsuits incidental to its ordinary business, and have filed actions against third parties in connection with such lawsuits. We have carefully analyzed our cases with our counsel, and we believe that we are not subject to any material risk of liability. Nevertheless, litigation is inherently unpredictable, time-consuming and distracting to our management team, and the expenses of conducting litigation are not inconsequential. Such distraction and expense may adversely affect the execution of our business plan and our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace. For additional information, see “Part II. Item 1, Legal Proceedings.”

As of December 31, 2017, $105.8 million of our current borrowings under the Cerberus Term Loan, Cerberus/PNC Revolver, and potential future borrowings are, and may continue to be, at variable rates of interest, tied to LIBOR or the Prime Rate of interest, thus exposing us to interest rate risk. If interest rates do increase, our debt service obligations on our variable rate indebtedness could increase even if the amount borrowed remained the same, resulting in a decrease in our net income. For example, if interest rates increased in the future by 100 basis points, based on our current borrowings as of December 31, 2017, we would incur approximately an additional $1.1 million per annum in interest expense.

We may not receive the full amounts estimated under the contracts in our backlog, which could reduce our revenue in future periods below the levels anticipated. This makes backlog an uncertain indicator of future operating results.

~~As of December~~On March 31, ~~2017, each of our subsidiaries~~2022, Faneuil had a significant backlog. Our backlog is typically subject to large variations from quarter to quarter and comparisons of backlog from period to period are not necessarily indicative of future revenue. The contracts comprising our backlog may not result in actual revenue in any particular period or at all, and the actual revenue from such contracts may differ from our backlog estimates. ~~The timing of receipt of revenue, if any, for projects included in backlog could change because many factors affect the scheduling of projects.~~ In certain instances, customers may have the right to cancel, reduce or defer amounts that we have in our backlog, which could negatively affect our future revenue. The failure to realize all amounts in our backlog could adversely affect our revenue and gross margins. As a result, ~~our subsidiaries’~~Faneuil’s backlog as of any particular date may not be an accurate indicator of our future revenue or earnings.

~~Account data breaches involving stored data or~~Risks Related to the ~~misuse of~~Company Generally

A widespread health crisis, such ~~data could~~as the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect our ~~reputation, performance,~~business, results of operations and financial condition.

~~We provide services~~A widespread health crisis, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and related governmental responses may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. These effects could include disruptions to our workforce due to illness or “shelter-in-place” restrictions, temporary closures of our facilities, the interruption of our supply chains and distribution channels, and similar effects on our customers or suppliers that ~~involve~~may impact their ability to perform under their contracts with us or cause them to curtail their business with us. In addition, we have taken and will continue to take temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the ~~storage~~risk of ~~non-public information. Cyber attacks designed~~COVID-19 to ~~gain access~~our employees, including requiring certain employees to ~~sensitive information are constantly evolving,~~work remotely and ~~high profile electronic security breaches leading~~suspending non-essential travel and in-person meetings, which could negatively affect our business. Further, COVID-19 has and is expected to ~~unauthorized releases~~continue to adversely affect the economies and financial markets of ~~sensitive information have occurred recently at a number of major U.S. companies, including several large retailers, despite widespread recognition~~many countries and most areas of the ~~cyber-attack threat~~United States, which may affect demand for our products and ~~improved data protection methods.~~ services and our ability to obtain additional financing for our business. Further impacts specific to Faneuil’s businesses may include:

Any ~~breach~~ of ~~the systems on which sensitive data and account information are stored or archived and any misuse by our employees, by employees of data archiving services or by other unauthorized users of such~~

data could lead to damage to our reputation, claims against us and other potential increases in costs. If we are unsuccessful in defending any lawsuit involving such data security breaches or misuse, we may be forced to pay damages, whichthese events could materially and adversely affect our ~~profitability~~business and our financial results. To the extent that the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial ~~condition. Also, damage~~results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, such as those relating to our ~~reputation stemming~~high level of indebtedness, our need to generate sufficient cash flows to service our indebtedness and our ability to comply with the covenants contained in our credit agreement.

As of April 13, 2022, after giving effect to the ~~regulatory environment relating to companies~~’ ~~obligations to protect such sensitive data becomes stricter, a material failure~~application of the net proceeds of the Phoenix Sale and the termination of the PNC Revolver, we have no outstanding indebtedness other than certain convertible promissory notes outstanding. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could have significant effects on our ~~part~~business, including:

Our future success depends upon our ability to continue to attract, train, integrate and retain highly skilled employees, particularly those on our management team, including Jess Ravich, our Chief Executive Officer and Brian Hartman, our Chief Financial Officer, whose services are essential to the execution of our corporate strategy and ensuring the continued operations and integrity of financial reporting within our company. Our executive officers and other key employees are generally employed on an at-will basis, which means that such personnel could terminate their relationship with ~~applicable regulations~~us at any time. The loss of any member of our senior management team could ~~subject~~significantly delay or prevent us ~~to fines~~ from achieving our business and/or ~~other regulatory sanctions.~~development objectives and could materially harm our business.

Some of our officers ~~do not devote all of their time to us because of~~may have outside business interests, which could impair our ability to implement our business strategies and lead to potential conflicts of interest.

Jess Ravich, our Executive Chairman, is also the Group Managing Director of The TCW Group, an asset management firm. While we believe that Mr. Ravich is able to devote sufficient amounts of time to our business, the fact that Mr. Ravich has outside business interests could lessen his focus on our business, and jeopardize our ability to implement our business strategies.

~~Additionally, some~~Some of our officers, in the course of their other business activities, may become aware of investments, business or other information which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as to other entities to which they owe a fiduciary duty. They may also in the future become affiliated with entities that are engaged in business or other activities similar to those we intend to conduct. As a result, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity particular opportunities or information should be presented. If, as a result of such conflict, we are deprived of investments, business or information, the execution of our business plan and our ability to effectively compete in the marketplace may be adversely affected.

We may not be able to consummate additional acquisitions and dispositions on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, we may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully and achieve anticipated synergies, or the acquisitions and dispositions we pursue could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition and operating results.

As part of our business strategy, we intend to continue to pursue acquisitions and dispositions. Acquisitions and dispositions could involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:

We may not be able to consummate acquisitions or dispositions on favorable terms or at all. Our ability to consummate acquisitions will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisition candidates, to negotiate acceptable terms for purchase and our access to financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity. In addition, we could experience financial or other setbacks if we are unable to realize, or are delayed in realizing, the anticipated benefits resulting from an acquisition, if we incur greater than expected costs in achieving the anticipated benefits or if any business that we acquire or invest in encounters problems or liabilities which we were not aware of or were more extensive than believed.

~~Our net operating loss carryforwards could be substantially limited if we experience an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.~~

~~Our ability to utilize net operating losses (~~“~~NOLs~~”~~) and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Code and tax credit carryforwards to offset our future taxable income and/or to recover previously paid taxes would be limited if we were to undergo an~~ “~~ownership change~~” ~~within the meaning of Section 382 of the Code.~~

~~Section 382 of the Code contains rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an~~ “~~ownership change,~~” which is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its NOLs and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership changes among stockholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by the company.

If we undergo an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 as a result of future transactions involving our common stock, including purchases or sales of stock between 5% stockholders, our ability to use our NOLs and to recognize certain built-in losses would be subject to the limitations of Section 382. Depending on the resulting limitation, a significant portion of our NOLs could expire before we would be able to use them. At the end of our last fiscal year, September 30, 2017, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $154.3 million that start expiring in 2022. Approximately $131.3 million of the carryforward expires in 2022. Our inability to utilize our NOLs would have a negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.

~~We do not believe we have experienced an~~ “~~ownership change~~” as defined by Section 382 in the last three years. However, whether a change in ownership occurs in the future is largely outside of our control, and there can be no assurance that such a change will not occur.

~~In May 2009, we announced that our Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan (the~~ “~~Rights Plan~~”) designed to preserve stockholder value and the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Code. We also amended our certificate of incorporation to add certain restrictions on transfers of our stock that may result in an ownership change under Section 382.

~~Changes in U.S. tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations or financial conditions.~~

The Tax Reform Law contains many significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws, the full consequences of which have not yet been determined. As a result of the enacted reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate, we recorded a one-time, non-cash increase to deferred income tax expense of $4.1 million to revalue ALJ’s net deferred tax asset. The one-time revaluation was based on our current knowledge, interpretation and understanding of the Tax Reform Law and its impact to our business. Other aspects of the Tax Reform Law, including, but not limited to the state tax effect of adjustments made to federal taxes and the interest expense deduction limitation may have additional material impacts on the value of our deferred tax assets, could result in significant one-time charges in the current or future taxable years, and could increase our future tax expense. The foregoing items could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations or financial conditions.

Our internal controls and procedures, including the internal controls and procedures of our subsidiaries, may be subject to deficiencies or weaknesses. Remedying and monitoring internal controls and procedures distracts our management from its operations, planning, oversight and performance functions, which could harm our operating results. Additionally, any failure of our internal controls or procedures could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our obligations to maintain adequate public information or to file periodic reports with the SEC, as applicable.

The concentration of our capital stock ownership with insiders will likely limit your ability to influence corporate matters.

Our executive officers and directors and their affiliated entities together beneficially ~~own a majority~~owned approximately 55.7% of our outstanding common stock ~~and~~on May 1, 2022. Jess Ravich, our current Chief Executive ~~Chairman owns~~Officer, beneficially owned approximately ~~36.0%~~47.1% of our ~~outstanding~~ common stock ~~as of December 31, 2017.~~on May 1, 2022. As a result, these stockholders, if they act together or in a block, could have significant influence over most matters that require approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, even if other stockholders oppose them. This concentration of ownership might also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company that other stockholders may view as beneficial.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.”

We ~~qualify as an~~ “~~emerging growth company,~~” ~~as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the~~ “~~JOBS Act~~”~~). We shall continue~~do not currently plan to ~~be deemed an emerging growth company until the earliest of:~~

~~(a) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more;~~

~~(b) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities of the issuer pursuant~~pay dividends to ~~an effective registration statement;~~

~~(c) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt, during the previous 3-year period, issued; or~~

As an emerging growth company, we will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. As an emerging growth company, we are exempt from Section 404(b) of Sarbanes Oxley. Section 404(a) requires issuers to publish information in their annual reports concerning the scope and adequacy of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. This statement shall also assess the effectiveness of such internal controls and procedures. Section 404(b) requires that the registered accounting firm shall, in the same report, attest to and report on the assessment of the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting.

As an emerging growth company, we are also exempt from Section 14A (a) and (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which require the shareholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachutes.

We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(2) of the JOBS Act, that allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

~~An active trading market for our common stock may never develop or be sustained.~~

On May 11, 2016, our stock began trading on The NASDAQ Global Market (“NASDAQ”) under the ticker symbol “ALJJ.” We cannot assure you that an active trading market for our common stock will develop on NASDAQ or elsewhere or, if developed, that any market will be sustained. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that a liquid trading market will exist, that you will be able to sell your shares of our common stock when you wish, or that you will obtain your desired price for your sharesholders of our common stock.

We ~~cannot assure you~~do not currently anticipate paying dividends to the holders of our common stock. Accordingly, holders of our common stock must rely on price appreciation as the sole method to realize a gain on their investment. There can be no assurances that the price of our common stock will ever appreciate in value.

Certain provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation contain transfer restrictions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing beneficial takeover bids by third parties.

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation imposes certain restrictions on transfer of stock designed to preserve the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with our NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382. These restrictions prohibit certain transfers that would result in a person or a group of persons acquiring 5% of more of ALJ’s outstanding stock, unless otherwise approved by our Board of Directors or a committee thereof. While such transfer restrictions are intended to protect our NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382, they may also have the effect of delaying or preventing beneficial takeover bids by third parties.

Changes in U.S. tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations or financial conditions

On December 22, 2017, then President Trump signed into law the final version of the Tax Reform Law. The Tax Reform Law significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, with many of its provisions effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Law, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including a permanent reduction of the corporate income tax rate, a partial limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, a limitation of the deduction for NOL carryforwards, an indefinite NOL carryforward, and the elimination of the two-year NOL carryback, temporary, immediate expensing for certain new investments and the modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits. We continue to ~~trade on NASDAQ.~~

~~Although our stock began trading on NASDAQ, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements.~~ ~~Such a listing helps our stockholders by providing a readily available trading market with current quotations. Without that, stockholders~~examine the impact this tax reform legislation may have ~~a difficult time getting a quote for~~on our business. Notwithstanding the ~~sale or purchase~~reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the overall impact of ~~our stock,~~ the ~~sale or purchase of our stock would likely be made more difficult~~Tax Reform Law is uncertain and the trading volume and liquidity of our stock would likely decline. In that regard, listing on a recognized national trading market such as NASDAQ will also affect our ability to benefit from the use of our operations and expansion plans, including the development of strategic relationships and acquisitions, which are critical to our business and ~~strategy. Any failure~~financial condition could be adversely affected. The impact of this reform on our stockholders is uncertain. Stockholders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the effect of the Tax Reform Law and other potential changes to ~~maintain NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements would result in negative publicity and would negatively impact our ability to raise capital in~~ the ~~future.~~U.S. Federal tax laws on them.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future in response to a number of factors, including the following:

Also, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations recently. This volatility has had a significant impact on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results.

We and Faneuil are currently involved in, and from time to time may become involved in, legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. Litigation is inherently unpredictable, time-consuming and distracting to our management team, and the expenses of conducting litigation are not inconsequential. Such distraction and expense may adversely affect the execution of our business plan and our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace. Further, if we do not prevail in litigation in which we may be involved, our results could be adversely affected, in some cases, materially. For additional information, see “Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies - Litigation, Claims, and Assessments.”

Any business disruptions due to political instability, armed hostilities, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or other unforeseen events could adversely affect our financial performance.

If terrorist activities, armed conflicts (including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine), political instability, or natural disasters, including climate change related events, such events may negatively affect our operations, cause general economic conditions to deteriorate or cause demand for our services to decline. A prolonged economic slowdown or recession could reduce the demand for our services, and consequently, negatively affect our future sales and profits. Any disruption of operations due to unforeseen events at any of our principal facilities could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Account data breaches involving stored data, or the misuse of such data could adversely affect our reputation, performance, and financial condition.

We and Faneuil provide services that involve the storage of non-public information. Cyber-attacks designed to gain access to sensitive information are constantly evolving, and high-profile electronic security breaches leading to unauthorized releases of sensitive information have occurred recently at several major U.S. companies, including several large retailers, despite widespread recognition of the cyber-attack threat and improved data protection methods. Any breach of the systems on which sensitive data and account information are stored or archived and any misuse by our employees, by employees of data archiving services or by other unauthorized users of such data could lead to damage to our reputation, claims against us and other potential increases in costs. If we are unsuccessful in defending any lawsuit involving such data security breaches or misuse, we may be forced to pay damages, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability and financial condition. Also, damage to our reputation stemming from such breaches could adversely affect our prospects. As the regulatory environment relating to companies’ obligations to protect such sensitive data becomes stricter, a material failure on our part to comply with applicable regulations could subject us to fines or other regulatory sanctions.

Your share ownership may be diluted by the issuance of additional shares of our common or preferred stock in the future.

Your share ownership may be diluted by the issuance of additional shares of our common or preferred stock or securities convertible into common or preferred stock in the future. ~~As of December~~On March 31, ~~2017,~~2022, a total of ~~1,914,000~~1,410,000 shares of our common stock are issuable pursuant to outstanding options issued by us at a weighted-average exercise price of ~~$3.11.~~$3.48, and 1,610,538 shares of our common stock are issuable pursuant to outstanding warrants at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.56. On March 31, 2022, ALJ had debt that was convertible into 11,158,357 shares of common stock at the discretion of the debt holder. It is probable that options or warrants to purchase our common stock, or debt that is convertible into common stock, will be exercised during their respective terms if the fair market value of our common stock exceeds the exercise price of the particular ~~option.~~option or warrant. If the stock options or warrants are exercised, your share ownership will be diluted. Additionally, options to purchase up to ~~1,370,000~~1,375,000 shares of ALJ common stock are available for grant under our existing equity compensation plans ~~as of December~~on March 31, ~~2017.~~ 2022.

In addition, our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors may determine from time to time that we need to raise additional capital by issuing additional shares of our common stock or other securities. We are not restricted from issuing additional common stock or preferred stock, including any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common or preferred stock. The issuance of any additional shares of common stock or preferred stock or securities convertible into, exchangeable for or that represent the right to receive common or preferred stock, or the exercise of such securities could be substantially dilutive to shareholders of our common stock. New investors also may have rights, preferences, and privileges that are senior to, and that adversely affect, our then current shareholders. Holders of our shares of common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle holders

to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of shares of our common stock made after this offering or the perception that such sales could occur. We cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our shareholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their stock holdings.

We doare a “smaller reporting company” and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not ~~currently plan~~“smaller reporting companies.”

We qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that we are not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent company that is not a “smaller reporting company,” and have either: (i) a public float of less than $250 million or (ii) annual revenues of less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and (A) no public float or (B) a public float of less than $700 million. As a “smaller reporting company,” we are subject to ~~pay dividends~~reduced disclosure obligations in our SEC filings compared to ~~holders~~other issuers, including with respect to disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. Until such time as we cease to be a “smaller reporting company,” such reduced disclosure in our SEC filings may make it harder for investors to analyze our operating results and financial prospects.

While we seek to mitigate our business risks associated with climate change, we recognize that there are inherent climate related risks regardless of where we conduct our businesses. Access to clean water and reliable energy in the communities where we conduct our business is a priority. Any of our ~~common stock.~~

~~We do not currently anticipate paying cash dividends~~locations may be vulnerable to the ~~holders~~adverse effects of climate change. Climate related events have the potential to disrupt our business, including the business of our common stock. Accordingly, holders of our common stock must rely on price appreciation as the sole method to realize a gain on their investment. There can be no assurances that the price of our common stock will ever appreciate in value.

~~The anti-takeover provisions of our stockholders rights plan~~customers, and may ~~have the effect of delaying or preventing beneficial takeover bids by third parties.~~

We have a stockholder rights plan designed to preserve the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with our NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382. At the end of our last fiscal year, September 30, 2017, we had approximately $154.3 million of NOLs. The use of such losses to offset federal income tax would be limited if we experience an “~~ownership change~~” under Section 382. This would occur if stockholders owning (or deemed under Section 382 to own) 5% or more of our stock by value increase their collective ownership of the aggregate amount of our stock by more than 50 percentage points over a defined period. The Rights Plan was adopted to reduce the likelihood of an “~~ownership change~~” ~~occurring as defined by Section 382.~~

In connection with the Rights Plan, we declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each share of its common stock outstanding as of the close of business on May 21, 2009. Pursuant to the Rights Plan, any stockholder or group that acquires beneficial ownership of 4.9 percent or more of our outstanding stock (an “~~Acquiring Person~~”) without the approval of our Board of Directors would be subjected to significant dilution of its holdings. Any existing stockholder holding 4.9% or more of our stock will not be considered an Acquiring Person unless such stockholder acquires additional stock; provided that existing stockholders actually known tocause us to ~~hold 4.9% or more of its stock as of April 30, 2009, are permitted~~experience higher attrition, losses and additional costs to purchase up to an additional 5% of our stock without triggering the Rights Plan. In addition, in its discretion, the Board of Directors may exempt certain persons whose acquisition of securities is determined by the Board of Directors not to jeopardize our deferred tax assets and may also exempt certain transactions. The Rights Plan will continue in effect until May 13, 2019, unless it is terminated or the preferred share purchase rights are redeemed earlier by the Board of Directors.resume operations.

~~While the Rights Plan is intended to protect our NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382, it may also have the effect of delaying or preventing beneficial takeover bids by third parties.~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Delaware		13-4082185
(State or other jurisdiction of		(~~I.R.S.Employer~~I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller Reporting Company	☒
Emerging growth company	☒☐

		Page

	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	4

Item 1	Financial Statements	4
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (unaudited)	8
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	79

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2330

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3343

Item 4	Controls and Procedures	3343

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION	3444

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	3444

Item 1A	Risk Factors	3544

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4754

Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4854

Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	4854

Item 5	Other Information	4854

Item 6	Exhibits	4955

	Signatures	5056

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Faneuil:
Healthcare	$	27,493	$	37,859	$	60,994	$	76,702
Transportation		26,702		21,615		51,984		41,710
Utility		13,398		13,756		26,559		26,820
Government		368		10,021		2,292		22,550
Other		553		1,173		1,464		2,611
Total Faneuil	$	68,514	$	84,424	$	143,293	$	170,393
Total consolidated revenue, net	$	68,514	$	84,424	$	143,293	$	170,393

	Purchase Price
Balance Sheet Caption	Allocation
Total current assets	$	1,767
Fixed assets		2,273
Identified intangible asset - supply agreement		4,700
Goodwill		1,408
Total assets		10,148
Total current liabilities		(148	)
Purchase price	$	10,000

Break Out of Components of Purchase Price Consideration
Term loan	$	7,500
Common stock issued		1,500
Cash received from exercise of stock option		1,000
Purchase price	$	10,000

(in thousands)	Contract Assets		Contract Liabilities
Balance, September 30, 2021	$	69	$	4,422
Additions to contract assets		26		—
Revenue recognized		—		(8,054	)
Cash received from customer		—		3,980
Balance, March 31, 2022	$	95	$	348

(in thousands)	Amount
Cash proceeds	$	500
Net assets sold		(1,199	)
Transaction costs		(62	)
Impact of income taxes		—
Total loss on sale	$	(761	)

(in thousands)		Amount
Current assets	$	4,615
Intangible assets, net		318
Other long-term assets		740
Current liabilities		(4,099	)
Long-term liabilities		(375	)
Net assets sold	$	1,199

	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
(in thousands)	March 31, 2021			March 31, 2021
Net revenue	$	5,106		$	13,799
Operating loss		(99	)		(302	)
Loss on sale		(761	)		(761	)
Loss before income taxes		(860	)		(1,063	)
Income tax expense		—			—
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(860	)		(1,063	)

Income Statement Caption	Amount
Revenue	$	8,526
Operating loss		(221	)

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2022			2021			2022			2021
Customer A		14.1	%		18.3	%		20.4	%	**				18.0	%	**
Customer B		14.1			15.9			11.3		**				11.2		**
Customer C	**				11.3		**				13.1	%		10.9			13.1	%

	Estimated Future Amortization
2018	$	4,101
2019		5,099
2020		4,800
2021		4,485
2022		4,067
Thereafter		23,946
	$	46,498

(in thousands)	Estimated Future Amortization
Fiscal 2022 (remaining)	$	1,284
Fiscal 2023		2,567
Fiscal 2024		2,429
Fiscal 2025		2,116
Fiscal 2026		1,447
Thereafter		779
Total	$	10,622

Description	Use of Proceeds	Origination Date	Interest Rate *	Quarterly Payments		Balance at December 31, 2017
Term Loan:
Financing Agreement	Phoenix acquisition	August 2015	7.99% to 8.30%	$	1,969	$	76,766
First Amendment	Color Optics acquisition	July 2016	7.99% to 8.30%		187		8,280
Third Amendment	Printing Components Business acquisition	October 2017	7.99% to 8.30%		141		7,045
Totals				$	2,297	$	92,091
Line of Credit:
Cerberus/PNC Revolver	Working Capital	August 2015	10.00% to 10.25%	$	—	$	8,162
Second Amendment	CMO Business acquisition	May 2017	7.99% to 8.30%		—		5,500
Totals				$	—	$	13,662

Year Ending December 31,	Future Minimum Payments
2018	$	9,188
2019		9,188
2020*		87,377
Total	$	105,753

Year Ending December 31,	Estimated Future Payments
2018	$	3,850
2019		2,766
2020		1,716
2021		535
2022		535
Thereafter		569
Total minimum required payments		9,971
Less: current portion of capital lease obligations		(3,575	)
Less: imputed interest		(666	)
Capital lease obligations, less current portion	$	5,730

Year Ending March 31,	Convertible Promissory Notes
2023	$	—
2024		6,026
Total	$	6,026

Year Ending December 31,	Future Minimum Lease Payments
2018	$	4,722
2019		4,098
2020		2,786
2021		1,861
2022		1,015
Thereafter		6,130
Total	$	20,612

(dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2022			September 30, 2021
Finance Leases:
Property and equipment, at cost	$	1,575		$	1,575
Less accumulated amortization		(1,237	)		(977	)
Property and equipment, net	$	338		$	598
Finance lease obligations, current portion	$	720		$	765
Finance lease obligations, less current portion		—			332
Total finance lease liabilities	$	720		$	1,097
Operating Leases:
Operating lease right-of-use assets	$	17,327		$	29,048
Operating lease obligations - current installments	$	3,044		$	4,722
Operating lease obligations, less current installments		20,187			32,767
Total operating lease obligations	$	23,231		$	37,489
Weighted average remaining lease term (years):
Finance		0.9			1.4
Operating		6.5			6.8
Weighted average discount rate:
Finance		6.0	%		6.0	%
Operating		10.7	%		10.7	%

Year Ending March 31,	Finance Leases			Operating Leases			Sublease Cash Receipts
2023	$	742		$	5,137		$	771
2024		—			4,924			771
2025		—			4,896			771
2026		—			4,844			771
2027		—			4,507			514
Thereafter		—			7,194
Total lease payments		742			31,502			3,598
Less: imputed interest		(22	)		(8,271	)		—
Total present value of lease payments	$	720		$	23,231		$	3,598

Reported as of March 31, 2022
Current	$	720		$	3,044
Non-current		-			20,187
Total	$	720		$	23,231

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
(in thousands)					2022		2021		2022		2021
Stock options	$	191	$	98	$	16	$	15	$	60	$	32
Common stock awards		102		85		26		22		53		53
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	293	$	183	$	42	$	37	$	113	$	85

	Three Months Ended December 31, 2017
	Faneuil		Carpets			Phoenix		ALJ			Total
Net revenue	$	51,474	$	16,650		$	26,830	$	—		$	94,954

Segment adjusted EBITDA	$	3,711	$	(726	)	$	4,160	$	(555	)	$	6,590
Interest expense												(2,660	)
Provision for income taxes												(3,371	)
Depreciation and amortization												(4,833	)
Stock-based compensation												(293	)
Restructuring expenses												(835	)
Acquisition-related expenses												(123	)
Gain on sales of assets												207
Net loss											$	(5,318	)

	Three Months Ended December 31, 2016
	Faneuil		Carpets			Phoenix		ALJ			Total
Net revenue	$	38,051	$	15,544		$	24,022	$	—		$	77,617

Segment adjusted EBITDA	$	3,761	$	(47	)	$	4,348	$	(834	)	$	7,228
Interest expense												(2,434	)
Provision for income taxes												(60	)
Depreciation and amortization												(3,961	)
Stock-based compensation												(183	)
Restructuring expenses												(31	)
Loss on sales of assets												(8	)
Net income											$	551

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
(in thousands)	Faneuil		ALJ Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	68,514	$	—		$	68,514
Segment adjusted EBITDA - continuing operations	$	2,759	$	(1,366	)	$	1,393
Depreciation and amortization							(2,754	)
Interest expense, net							(2,593	)
Acquisition/disposition-related expenses							(2,281	)
Lease impairment							(2,158	)
Provision for income taxes							(46	)
Stock-based compensation							(42	)
Net loss from continuing operations							(8,481	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes							5,565
Net loss						$	(2,916	)

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2022
(in thousands)	Faneuil		ALJ Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	143,293	$	—		$	143,293

Segment adjusted EBITDA - continuing operations	$	943	$	(2,803	)	$	(1,860	)
Depreciation and amortization							(6,139	)
Interest expense, net							(5,298	)
Lease impairment							(2,158	)
Acquisition/disposition-related expenses							(4,670	)
Security Event expenses							(168	)
Stock-based compensation							(113	)
Restructuring and cost reduction initiatives							(75	)
Loss on disposal of assets, net							(26	)
Benefit from income taxes							55
Net loss from continuing operations							(20,452	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes							8,144
Net loss						$	(12,308	)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
(in thousands)	Faneuil		ALJ Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	84,424	$	—		$	84,424
Segment adjusted EBITDA - continuing operations	$	5,004	$	(1,378	)	$	3,626
Depreciation and amortization							(3,125	)
Interest expense, net							(2,451	)
Bank fees accreted to term loans							(300	)
Restructuring and cost reduction initiatives							(164	)
Loan amendment expenses							(89	)
Provision for income taxes							(50	)
Stock-based compensation							(37	)
Net loss from continuing operations							(2,590	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes							2,475
Net loss						$	(115	)

	Six Months Ended March 31, 2021
(in thousands)	Faneuil		ALJ Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenue	$	170,393	$	—		$	170,393

Segment adjusted EBITDA - continuing operations	$	8,641	$	(2,620	)	$	6,021
Depreciation and amortization							(6,339	)
Interest expense, net							(5,033	)
Bank fees accreted to term loans							(600	)
Restructuring and cost reduction initiatives							(188	)
Loan amendment expenses							(177	)
Provision for income taxes							(174	)
Stock-based compensation							(85	)
Net loss from continuing operations							(6,575	)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes							4,373
Net loss						$	(2,202	)

	As of December 31,
	2017		2016
Within one year	$	97.8	$	81.7
Between one year and two years		81.1		54.2
Between two years and three years		68.5		44.7
Between three years and four years		16.7		41.5
Thereafter		10.5		1.5
	$	274.6	$	223.6

	As of December 31,				As of March 31,
	2017		2016
(in millions)					2022		2021
Within one year	$	17.9	$	37.2	$	60.6	$	119.4
Between one year and two years		25.1		30.1		24.8		54.2
Between two years and three years		7.8		12.1		11.9		28.6
Between three years and four years		1.5		2.8		3.2		11.6
	$	52.3	$	82.2
Thereafter						4.8		6.3
Total Faneuil backlog					$	105.3	$	220.1

(in millions)	Amount
Cash Inflows:
Proceeds from Faneuil Asset Sale⁽¹⁾	$	127.3
Proceeds from Phoenix Sale⁽²⁾		136.4
Cash Outflows:
Blue Torch Payoff		(92.2	)
PNC Revolver Payoff		(11.6	)
Transaction-related expenses (including income taxes)⁽³⁾		(27.3	)
Estimated net increase to ALJ liquidity	$	132.6

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit	Method of Filing
3.1	Restated Bylaws of ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc., dated as of May 11, 2009	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-12B as filed on February 2, 2016

~~3.1~~3.2	~~First Amendment to the~~ Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on ~~June 1, 2010~~August 17, 2018	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~3.1~~3.5 to Form ~~10-12B~~10-K as filed ~~February 2, 2016.~~

~~3.2~~	~~Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware~~ on ~~June 16, 2009~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-12B as filed February 2, 2016.~~

~~3.3~~	~~Certificate of Ownership and Merger of YouthStream Media Networks, Inc. as filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 23, 2006~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Form 10-12B as filed February 2, 2016.~~

~~3.4~~	~~Restated Bylaws of ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc., dated as of May 11, 2009~~	~~Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-12B as filed February 2, 2016.~~December 17, 2018

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ~~Exchange Act)~~"Exchange Act")	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

101.INS	Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed herewith

101.CAL	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.DEF	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.LAB	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.PRE	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.INS)	Filed herewith


ALJ Regional Holdings, Inc.

~~Date: February 14, 2018~~
	Date: May 16, 2022
	/s/Jess Ravich
	Jess Ravich
	Chief Executive ~~Chairman~~Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: ~~February 14, 2018~~May 16, 2022
	/s/Brian Hartman
	Brian Hartman
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)