(Address of ~~principal executive offices~~Principal Executive Offices and ~~zip code)~~Zip Code)

(Registrant’s ~~telephone number, including area code)~~Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

~~(Formed name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange ~~Act.:~~Act:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities ~~Act~~ Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of ~~October 29, 2019~~November 2, 2020 was ~~9,180,013~~9,544,607 and ~~5,180,883,~~4,827,731, respectively.

Except where the context requires otherwise and as otherwise set forth herein, in this report, references to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer to Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”) and its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary (“Silvercrest L.P.” or “SLP”). SLP is a limited partnership whose existing limited partners are referred to in this report as “principals”.

This report contains, and from time to time our management may make, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended.For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor ~~provisions of~~for forward-looking statements contained in the ~~U.S.~~ Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may”, “might”, “will”, “should”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue”, the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements ~~which~~ are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, may include projections of our future financial performance, future expenses, anticipated growth strategies, descriptions of new business initiatives and anticipated trends in our business or financial results.assumptions. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. Important factors that could cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to: incurrence of net losses, fluctuations in quarterly and annual results, adverse economic or market conditions, our expectations with respect to future levels of assets under management, inflows and outflows, our ability to retain clients from whom we derive a substantial portion of our assets under management, our ability to maintain our fee structure, our particular choices with regard to investment strategies employed, our ability to hire and retain qualified investment professionals, the cost of complying with current and future regulation coupled with the cost of defending ourselves from related investigations or litigation, failure of our operational safeguards against breaches in data security, privacy, conflicts of interest or employee misconduct, our expected tax rate, and our expectations with respect to deferred tax assets, adverse economic or market conditions, including the continued adverse effects of the coronavirus pandemic, incurrence of net losses, adverse effects of management focusing on implementation of a growth strategy, failure to develop and maintain the Silvercrest brand and other factors disclosed under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 which is accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,841	$	69,283	$	48,171	$	52,832
Investments		16		1,493		16		1,781
Receivables, net		8,867		8,022		8,642		8,958
Due from Silvercrest Funds		1,549		1,233		1,806		1,697
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net		6,019		3,436		5,630		6,015
Goodwill		63,675		25,168		63,675		63,675
Operating lease assets		34,467		—		31,103		33,485
Finance lease assets		204		—		284		198
Intangible assets, net		29,992		9,893		27,216		29,286
Deferred tax asset—tax receivable agreement		12,913		12,206		11,646		13,190
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,555		2,629		3,057		3,132
Total assets	$	203,098	$	133,363	$	201,246	$	214,249
Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	18,388	$	2,947	$	16,576	$	18,527
Accrued compensation		21,291		31,470		22,554		32,252
Borrowings under credit facility		17,100		—		13,500		16,200
Deferred rent		—		7,225
Operating lease liabilities		40,920		—		37,254		39,848
Finance lease liabilities		206		—		289		196
Deferred tax and other liabilities		9,958		9,322		10,160		9,419
Total liabilities		107,863		50,964		100,333		116,442
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Equity
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding, as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		—		—
Class A common stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,180,013 and 8,518,096 issued and outstanding, as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		92		85
Class B common stock, par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 5,180,883 and 4,934,103 issued and outstanding, as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		51		48
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; NaN issued and outstanding, as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019						—		—
Class A common stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 9,544,607 and 9,329,879 issued and outstanding, as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively						95		93
Class B common stock, par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 4,827,731 and 5,031,017 issued and outstanding, as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively						47		49
Additional Paid-In Capital		48,238		43,584		50,185		49,246
Retained earnings		14,608		12,330		19,155		15,648
Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s equity		62,989		56,047		69,482		65,036
Non-controlling interests		32,246		26,352		31,431		32,771
Total equity		95,235		82,399		100,913		97,807
Total liabilities and equity	$	203,098	$	133,363	$	201,246	$	214,249

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Revenue
Management and advisory fees	$	26,842		$	23,841		$	71,310		$	70,683		$	26,148		$	26,842		$	76,554		$	71,310
Family office services		1,003			1,091			3,004			3,157			1,034			1,003			3,014			3,004
Total revenue		27,845			24,932			74,314			73,840			27,182			27,845			79,568			74,314
Expenses
Compensation and benefits		15,100			14,949			42,481			43,706			15,142			15,100			44,217			42,481
General and administrative		6,444			4,817			17,103			14,221			7,091			6,444			16,431			17,103
Total expenses		21,544			19,766			59,584			57,927			22,233			21,544			60,648			59,584
Income before other income (expense), net		6,301			5,166			14,730			15,913
Other income (expense), net
Other income (expense), net		242			(23	)		257			(5	)
Income before other (expense) income, net														4,949			6,301			18,920			14,730
Other (expense) income, net
Other (expense) income, net														8			242			23			257
Interest income		11			70			160			199			2			11			12			160
Interest expense		(239	)		(7	)		(255	)		(36	)		(120	)		(239	)		(445	)		(255	)
Equity income from investments		9			—			9			—			—			9			—			9
Total other income (expense), net		23			40			171			158
Total other (expense) income, net														(110	)		23			(410	)		171
Income before provision for income taxes		6,324			5,206			14,901			16,071			4,839			6,324			18,510			14,901
Provision for income taxes		1,501			1,313			3,682			3,935			1,359			1,501			4,558			3,682
Net income		4,823			3,893			11,219			12,136			3,480			4,823			13,952			11,219
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests		(2,170	)		(1,731	)		(4,993	)		(5,406	)		(1,421	)		(2,170	)		(5,871	)		(4,993	)
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	2,653		$	2,162		$	6,226		$	6,730		$	2,059		$	2,653		$	8,081		$	6,226
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.30		$	0.26		$	0.72		$	0.81		$	0.22		$	0.30		$	0.85		$	0.72
Diluted	$	0.30		$	0.26		$	0.72		$	0.81		$	0.22		$	0.30		$	0.85		$	0.72
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		8,870,674			8,321,927			8,659,403			8,266,359			9,532,362			8,870,674			9,478,695			8,659,403
Diluted		8,872,571			8,325,718			8,662,140			8,270,984			9,540,604			8,872,571			9,488,259			8,662,140

Class A
Common
Stock
Shares

Class A
Common
Stock
Amount

Class B
Common
Stock
Shares

Class B
Common
Stock
Amount

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Total
Silvercrest
Asset
Management
Group Inc.’s
Equity

Non-
controlling
Interest

Total
Equity

January 1, 2018

8,142

$
81

5,059

$
49

$
41,606

$
7,359

$
49,095

$
23,024

$
72,119

Distributions to partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(2,072
)

(2,072
)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

552

552

Equity-based compensation

—

—

—

—

6

—

6

794

800

Net Income

—

—

—

—

—

2,231

2,231

1,819

4,050

Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(8
)

(8
)
Share conversion

117

1

(117
)

(1
)

605

—

605

(605
)

—

Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement

—

—

—

—

(14
)

—

(14
)

—

(14
)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.14 per share

—

—

—

—

—

(1,144
)

(1,144
)

—

(1,144
)
March 31, 2018

8,259

$
82

4,942

$
48

$
42,203

$
8,446

$
50,779

$
23,504

$
74,283

Distributions to partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(2,940
)

(2,940
)
Equity-based compensation

2

1

2

—

6

—

7

794

801

Issuance of notes receivable

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(100
)

(100
)
Issuance of Class B shares

—

—

6

—

—

—

—

100

100

Net Income

—

—

—

—

—

2,337

2,337

1,856

4,193

Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(7
)

(7
)
Share conversion

45

—

(45
)

—

226

—

226

(226
)

—

Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement

—

—

—

—

15

—

15

—

15

Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.14 per share

—

—

—

—

—

(1,163
)

(1,163
)

—

(1,163
)
June 30, 2018

8,306

$
83

4,905

$
48

$
42,450

$
9,620

$
52,201

$
22,981

$
75,182

Distributions to partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1,530
)

(1,530
)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

567

567

Equity-based compensation

—

—

242

2

6

—

8

824

832

Net Income

—

—

—

—

—

2,162

2,162

1,731

3,893

Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(6
)

(6
)
Share conversion

40

—

(40
)

—

207

—

207

(207
)

—

Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement

—

—

—

—

19

—

19

—

19

Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.14 per share

—

—

—

—

—

(1,168
)

(1,168
)

—

(1,168
)
September 30, 2018

8,346

$
83

5,107

$
50

$
42,682

$
10,614

$
53,429

$
24,360

$
77,789

	Class A Common Stock Shares		Class A Common Stock Amount		Class B Common Stock Shares			Class B Common Stock Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s Equity			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity

January 1, 2019		8,518	$	85		4,934		$	48		$	43,584	$	12,330		$	56,047		$	26,352		$	82,399
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			(2,285	)		(2,285	)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			291			291
Equity-based compensation		—		—		—			—			6		—			6			836			842
Issuance of Class B shares		—		—		2			—			—		—			—			20			20
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—		1,709			1,709			1,336			3,045
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			9		—			9			—			9
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			(3	)		(3	)
Share conversion		17		—		(17	)		—			97		—			97			(97	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.15 per share		—		—		—			—			—		(1,278	)		(1,278	)		—			(1,278	)
March 31, 2019		8,535	$	85		4,919		$	48		$	43,696	$	12,761		$	56,590		$	26,450		$	83,040
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			(3,474	)		(3,474	)
Equity-based compensation		2		—		1			—			6		—			6			873			879
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—		1,864			1,864			1,487			3,351
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			28		—			28			—			28
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			(3	)		(3	)
Share conversion		87		1		(87	)		(1	)		458		—			458			(458	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.15 per share		—		—		—			—			—		(1,293	)		(1,293	)		—			(1,293	)
June 30, 2019		8,624	$	86		4,833		$	47		$	44,188	$	13,332		$	57,653		$	24,875		$	82,528
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			(1,626	)		(1,626	)
Equity-based compensation		—		—		241			3			6		—			9			436			445
Issuance of Class B shares		—		—		663			7			—		—			7			8,945			8,952
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—		2,653			2,653			2,170			4,823
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			1,493		—			1,493			—			1,493
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—		—			—			(3	)		(3	)
Share conversion		556		6		(556	)		(6	)		2,551		—			2,551			(2,551	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.15 per share		—		—		—			—			—		(1,377	)		(1,377	)		—			(1,377	)
September 30, 2019		9,180	$	92		5,181		$	51		$	48,238	$	14,608		$	62,989		$	32,246		$	95,235

Nine months ended September 30,

2019

2018

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net income

$
11,219

$
12,136

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:

Equity-based compensation

2,166

2,433

Depreciation and amortization

2,216

1,832

Deferred rent

—

3,731

Deferred income taxes

1,885

127

Tax receivable agreement adjustment

(234
)

578

Non-cash interest on notes receivable from partners

(9
)

(22
)
Distributions received from investment funds

1,486

610

Equity income from investments

(9
)

—

Other

(1
)

37

Cash flows due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Receivables and due from Silvercrest Funds

(3,408
)

(182
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets

(1,137
)

(1,408
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses

(158
)

(732
)
Accrued compensation

(10,179
)

(4,395
)
Deferred and other liabilities

(5
)

(51
)
Interest payable on notes payable

—

18

Net cash provided by operating activities

3,832

14,712

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

Acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements

$
(3,579
)

$
(631
)
Acquisition of Neosho Capital, LLC

(399
)

—

Acquisition of Cortina Asset Management, LLC

(35,169
)

—

Net cash used in investing activities

(39,147
)

(631
)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Earn-outs paid related to acquisitions completed on or after January 1, 2009

$
(425
)

$
(447
)
Borrowings under credit facility

18,000

—

Repayments of notes payable

(900
)

(758
)
Principal payments on financing leases

(78
)

(86
)
Operating lease liabilities

1,318

—

Distributions to partners

(7,385
)

(6,541
)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock

(3,948
)

(3,475
)
Payments from partners on notes receivable

291

1,119

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

6,873

(10,188
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(28,442
)

3,893

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

69,283

53,822

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$
40,841

$
57,715

	Class A Common Stock Shares		Class A Common Stock Amount		Class B Common Stock Shares			Class B Common Stock Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s Equity			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity

January 1, 2020		9,330	$	93		5,031		$	49		$	49,246		$	15,648		$	65,036		$	32,771		$	97,807
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2,226	)		(2,226	)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			300			300
Equity-based compensation		—		—		—			—			9			—			9			100			109
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—			5,532			5,532			4,158			9,690
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			(364	)		—			(364	)		—			(364	)
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2	)		(2	)
Share conversion		176		2		(176	)		(2	)		1,149			—			1,149			(1,149	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.15 per share		—		—		—			—			—			(1,520	)		(1,520	)		—			(1,520	)
March 31, 2020		9,506	$	95		4,855		$	47		$	50,040		$	19,660		$	69,842		$	33,952		$	103,794
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2,798	)		(2,798	)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Equity-based compensation		2		—		9			—			10			—			10			147			157
Net Income		—		—		—			��			—			490			490			292			782
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			8			—			8			—			8
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2	)		(2	)
Share conversion		12		—		(12	)		—			88			—			88			(88	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.16 per share		—		—		—			—			—			(1,523	)		(1,523	)		—			(1,523	)
June 30, 2020		9,520	$	95		4,852		$	47		$	50,146		$	18,627		$	68,915		$	31,503		$	100,418
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(1,497	)		(1,497	)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Equity-based compensation		1		—		—			—			52			—			52			169			221
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—			2,059			2,059			1,421			3,480
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			(176	)		—			(176	)		—			(176	)
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2	)		(2	)
Share conversion		24		—		(24	)		—			163			—			163			(163	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.16 per share		—		—		—			—			—			(1,531	)		(1,531	)		—			(1,531	)
September 30, 2020		9,545	$	95		4,828		$	47		$	50,185		$	19,155		$	69,482		$	31,431		$	100,913

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2020			2019
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	13,952		$	11,219
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity-based compensation		456			2,166
Depreciation and amortization		2,995			2,216
Deferred income taxes		1,741			1,885
Tax receivable agreement adjustment		—			(234	)
Non-cash interest on notes receivable from partners		(6	)		(9	)
Non-cash lease expense		2,382			—
Distributions received from investment funds		1,765			1,486
Equity income from investments		—			(9	)
Other		—			(1	)
Cash flows due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables and Due from Silvercrest Funds		207			(3,408	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		73			(1,137	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,181	)		(158	)
Accrued compensation		(9,698	)		(10,179	)
Operating lease liabilities		(2,594	)		—
Deferred and other liabilities		13			(5	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		10,105			3,832
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements	$	(453	)	$	(3,579	)
Acquisition of Neosho Capital, LLC		—			(399	)
Acquisition of Cortina Asset Management, LLC		—			(35,169	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(453	)		(39,147	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Earn-outs paid related to acquisitions completed on or after January 1, 2009	$	(741	)	$	(425	)
Borrowings under credit facility		—			18,000
Repayments of notes payable		(2,700	)		(900	)
Principal payments on financing leases		(81	)		(78	)
Operating lease liabilities		—			1,318
Distributions to partners		(6,521	)		(7,385	)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock		(4,570	)		(3,948	)
Payments from partners on notes receivable		300			291
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(14,313	)		6,873
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(4,661	)		(28,442	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		52,832			69,283
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	48,171		$	40,841

As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019

(Dollars in thousands, except per share and par value data and as otherwise indicated)

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”), together with its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., a limited partnership, (collectively the “Company”), was formed as a Delaware corporation on July 11, 2011. Silvercrest is a holding company that was formed in order to carry on the business of Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary, and its subsidiaries. Effective on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest became the sole general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and its only material asset is the general partner interest in Silvercrest L.P., represented by ~~9,180,013~~9,544,607 Class A units or approximately ~~62.2%~~66.3% of the outstanding interests of Silvercrest L.P. Silvercrest controls all of the businesses and affairs of Silvercrest L.P. and, through Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries, continues to conduct the business previously conducted by these entities prior to the reorganization.

Silvercrest L.P., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively “SLP”), provides investment management and family office services to individuals and families and their trusts, and to endowments, foundations and other institutional investors primarily located in the United States of America. The business includes the management of funds of funds and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”.

Silvercrest L.P. was formed on December 10, 2008 and commenced operations on January 1, 2009.

On March 11, 2004, Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of James C. Edwards Asset Management, Inc. (“JCE”) and subsequently changed JCE’s name to Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc. (“SFS”). On December 31, 2004, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of the LongChamp Group, Inc. (now SAM Alternative Solutions, Inc.) (“LGI”). Effective March 31, 2005, SLP entered into an Asset Contribution Agreement with and acquired all of the assets, properties, rights and certain liabilities of Heritage Financial Management, LLC (“HFM”). Effective October 3, 2008, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Marathon Capital Group, LLC (“MCG”) through a limited liability company interest purchase agreement dated September 22, 2008. On November 1, 2011, SLP acquired certain assets of Milbank Winthrop & Co. (“Milbank”). On April 1, 2012, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of MW Commodity Advisors, LLC (“Commodity Advisors”). On March 28, 2013, SLP acquired certain assets of Ten-Sixty Asset Management, LLC (“Ten-Sixty”). On June 30, 2015, SLP acquired certain assets of Jamison, Eaton & Wood, Inc. (“Jamison”). On January 11, 2016, SLP acquired certain assets of Cappiccille & Company, LLC (“Cappiccille”). On January 15, 2019, SLP acquired certain assets of Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho”). On July 1, 2019, SLP acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Cortina Asset Management, LLC (“Cortina”). See Notes 3, 7 and 8 for additional information related to the acquisition, goodwill and intangible assets arising from these acquisitions.

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering (the “IPO”) and reorganization of SLP that were completed on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “TRA”) with the partners of SLP that requires it to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that it actually realizes (or is deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by it, or a change in control) as a result of the increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the TRA, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the TRA or attributable to exchanges of shares of Class B common stock for shares of Class A common stock. The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement are a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P. As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, this liability is estimated to be ~~$9,762~~$10,010 and is included in deferred tax and other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Silvercrest expects to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash savings realized, if any.

The TRA was effective upon the consummation of the IPO and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless Silvercrest exercises its right to terminate the TRA for an amount based on an agreed upon value of the payments remaining to be made under the agreement. The TRA will automatically terminate with respect to Silvercrest’s obligations to a partner if a partner (i) is terminated for cause, (ii) breaches his or her non-solicitation covenants with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries or (iii) voluntarily resigns or retires and competes with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries in the 12-month period following resignation of employment or retirement, and no further payments will be made to such partner under the TRA.

For purposes of the TRA, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing Silvercrest’s actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there been no increase in its share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of SLP.

Estimating the amount of payments that Silvercrest may be required to make under the TRA is imprecise by nature, because the actual increase in its share of the tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

In addition, the TRA provides that, upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, Silvercrest’s (or its successors’) obligations with respect to exchanged or acquired Silvercrest Class B units (whether exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that Silvercrest would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the TRA.

Decisions made by the continuing partners of SLP in the course of running Silvercrest’s business, such as with respect to mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments that are received by an exchanging or selling principal under the TRA. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction will generally accelerate payments under the TRA and increase the present value of such payments, and the disposition of assets before an exchange or acquisition transaction will increase an existing owner’s tax liability without giving rise to any rights of a principal to receive payments under the TRA.

Were the IRS to successfully challenge the tax basis increases described above, Silvercrest would not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the TRA. As a result, in certain circumstances, Silvercrest could make payments under the TRA in excess of its actual cash savings in income tax.

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Silvercrest and its wholly owned subsidiaries SLP, SAMG LLC, SFS, MCG, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Investors III LLC as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Condensed Consolidated ~~Statements~~Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, ~~2018~~2019 was derived from the audited Consolidated ~~Statements~~Statement of Financial Condition at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 or any future period.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial position and results, have been made. The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes should be read together with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The Company evaluates for consolidation those entities it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Silvercrest Funds over which the general partner or equivalent is presumed to have control, e.g. by virtue of the limited partners not being able to remove the general partner. The initial step in the Company’s determination of whether a fund for which SLP is the general partner is required to be consolidated is assessing whether the fund is a variable interest entity or a voting interest entity.

SLP then considers whether the fund is a voting interest entity (“VoIE”) in which the unaffiliated limited partners have substantive “kick-out” rights that provide the ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause. SLP considers the “kick-out” rights to be substantive if the general partner for the fund can be removed by the vote of a simple majority of the unaffiliated limited partners and there are no significant barriers to the unaffiliated limited partners’ ability to exercise these rights in that among other things, (1) there are no conditions or timing limits on when the rights can be exercised, (2) there are no financial or operational barriers associated with replacing the general partner, (3) there are a number of qualified replacement investment advisors that would accept appointment at the same fee level, (4) each fund’s documents provide for the ability to call and conduct a vote, and (5) the information necessary to exercise the kick-out rights and related vote are available from the fund and its administrator.

If the fund is a variable interest entity, SLP then determines whether it has a variable interest in the fund, and if so, whether SLP is the primary beneficiary. In determining whether SLP is the primary beneficiary, SLP evaluates its control rights as well as economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by SLP. The consolidation analysis can generally be performed qualitatively; however, if it is not readily apparent that SLP is not the primary beneficiary, a quantitative analysis may also be performed. Amendments to the governing documents of the respective Silvercrest Funds could affect an entity’s status as a VIE or the determination of the primary beneficiary. At each reporting date, SLP assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary and will consolidate or deconsolidate accordingly.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, each fund is deemed to be a VoIE and neither SLP nor Silvercrest consolidated any of the Silvercrest Funds.

As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Silvercrest holds approximately ~~62.2%~~66.3% of the economic interests in SLP. Silvercrest is the sole general partner of SLP and, therefore, controls the management of SLP. As a result, Silvercrest consolidates the financial position and the results of operations of SLP and its subsidiaries, and records a non-controlling interest, as a separate component of equity on its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for the remaining economic interests in SLP. The non-controlling interest in the income or loss of SLP is included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a reduction or addition to net income derived from SLP.

The Company views its operations as ~~comprising one~~comprising1 operating ~~segment.~~segment, the investment management industry. Each of the Company’s acquired businesses has similar economic characteristics and has been or is in the process of being fully integrated. Furthermore, our chief operating decision maker, who is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, monitors and reviews financial information at a consolidated level for assessing operating results and the allocation of resources.

The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and other income reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, determination of equity-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, determination of the useful lives of long-lived assets and other matters that affect the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Entities and investments, the activities over which the Company exercises significant influence, but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, whereby the Company records its share of the underlying income or losses of these entities. Intercompany profit arising from transactions with affiliates is eliminated to the extent of its beneficial interest. Equity in losses of equity method investments is not recognized after the carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans, has been reduced to ~~zero,~~0, unless guarantees or other funding obligations exist.

The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable. The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment when the loss in value is deemed other than temporary. The Company’s equity method investments approximate their fair value at September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The fair value of the equity method investments is estimated based on the Company’s share of the fair value of the net assets of the equity method investee. NoNaN impairment charges related to equity method investments were recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 or ~~2018.~~2019.

Receivables consist primarily of amounts for management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations and family office service fees due from clients, and are stated as net realizable value. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful receivables based on estimates of expected losses and specific identification of uncollectible accounts. The Company charges actual losses to the allowance when incurred.

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment, computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements and are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements is the lesser of the lease term or the life of the asset, generally 10 years, and 3 to 7 years for other fixed assets.

The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that ~~the~~ purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. The method for determining relative fair value varied depending on the type of asset or liability and involved management making significant estimates related to assumptions such as future growth rates used to produce financial projections and the selection of unobservable inputs and other assumptions. The inputs used in establishing the fair value are in most cases unobservable and reflect the Company's own judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Contingent consideration is recorded as part of the purchase price when such contingent consideration is not based on continuing employment of the selling shareholders. Contingent consideration that is related to continuing employment is recorded as compensation expense. Payments made for contingent consideration recorded as part of an acquisition’s purchase price are reflected as financing activities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company remeasures the fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow method based on significant inputs not observable in the market and any change in the fair value from either the passage of time or events occurring after the acquisition date, is recorded in earnings. Contingent consideration payments that exceed the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration are reflected as an operating activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired, including intangibles, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The Company generally uses valuation specialists to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities. During the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period are recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized ~~and~~but is ~~generally~~ evaluated for impairment ~~using a two-step process that is performed~~ at least annually, on October 1^st of each year, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

The Company accounts for Goodwill under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” which provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment of whether a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than its carrying value, including goodwill. In performing its qualitative assessment, an entity considers the extent to which adverse events or circumstances identified, such as changes in economic conditions, industry and market conditions or entity specific events, could affect the comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. If an entity concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount, the entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and, accordingly, measure the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit. The Company utilized this option when performing its annual impairment assessment in ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 and concluded that its single reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not greater than its carrying value, including goodwill.

The Company has ~~one~~1 reporting unit at September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018. No~~2019. NaN goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

Intangible assets of the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also re-evaluates the periods of amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceed their fair value.

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The method of amortization is based on the pattern over which the economic benefits, generally expected undiscounted cash flows, of the intangible asset are consumed. Intangible assets for which no pattern can be reliably determined are amortized using the straight-line method. Intangible assets consist primarily of the contractual right to future management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations from customer contracts or relationships.

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also reevaluates the periods of depreciation and amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value.

Partner incentive allocations, which are determined by the general partner, can be formula-based or discretionary. Partner incentive allocations are treated as compensation expense and recognized in the period in which they are earned. In the event there is insufficient distributable cash flow to make incentive distributions, the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may determine not to make any distributions called for under the partnership agreement. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations is generally allocated to unit holders based on their pro rata ownership.

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP has the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees or (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

SLP also makes distributions to its partners of various nature including incentive payments, profit distributions and tax distributions. The profit distributions and tax distributions are accounted for as equity transactions.

The Company’s Class A stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. Also, Class A stockholders are entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared by the Company’s board of directors, out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any statutory or contractual restrictions on the payment of dividends and to any restrictions on the payment of dividends imposed by the terms of any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares of Class A common stock may be paid only as follows: (i) shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders of shares of Class A common stock and (ii) shares will be paid proportionately with respect to each outstanding share of the Company’s Class A common stock. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to holders of preferred stock having a liquidation preference, if any, the Class A stockholders will be entitled to share ratably in the Company’s remaining assets available for distribution to Class A stockholders. Class B units of SLP held by principals will be exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for share splits, dividends and reclassifications.

Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, the Company will issue the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of the Company’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by the Company if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP and the terms of the Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Equity Incentive Plan”). The Company’s Class B stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s Class B stockholders will not participate in any dividends declared by the Company’s board of directors. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of its assets, Class B stockholders only will be entitled to receive the par value of the Company’s Class B common stock.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The Company has evaluated the impact of ASC 606 on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The impact of adopting ASC 606 is de minimis to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and recognition of revenue when compared to the prior year revenue recognition accounting guidance. The new revenue standard requires more comprehensive revenue recognition disclosure in the Company’s notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company generates revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Performance fees and allocations also relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which the Company has a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which the Company has no partnership interest. Management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for the Company’s separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for the Company’s private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by the Company upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with the Company, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for the private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of the Company’s investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from the Company to their clients.

The management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of the Company’s assets under management. The assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into the Company’s various investment strategies and the investment performance of its clients’ accounts. In order to increase the Company’s assets under management and expand its business, the Company must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of its target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. The Company’s ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

The majority of management and advisory fees that the Company earns on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of the management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. The Company’s basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is generally: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance, (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65% ~~and~~, (iv) for Cortina equity portfolios, 1.0% on the first $25 million, 0.90% on the next $25 million and 0.80% on the balance and (v) for outsourced chief investment officer portfolios, 0.40% on the first $50 million, 0.32% of the next $50 million and 0.24% on the balance. The Company’s fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of the Company’s clients pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

Management fees earned on investment funds that the Company advises are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For the Company’s private fund clients, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which the Company performs risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

The Company’s management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

The Company’s performance fees and allocations may fluctuate based on performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees and allocations.

The Company’s family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to its clients. The Company’s dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom the Company performs these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

The Company accounts for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. The Company records performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue once the performance fee or allocation, as applicable, has crystalized. As a result, there is no estimate or variability in the consideration when revenue is recorded.

The Company utilized the modified cumulative effect method as part its adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company recognized the modified cumulative effective of initially applying ASU 2014-09 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application. As stated above, the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 was immaterial. This method was applied to either incomplete contracts the revenue of which had not been recognized in accordance with prior revenue guidance as of the date of initial application or all contracts as of, and new contracts after, the date of initial application. As of December 31, 2017, all revenue recognized was for complete contracts of revenue. As a result, there was no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of adoption, which was January 1, 2018.

Equity-based compensation cost relating to the issuance of share-based awards to employees is based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant, which is expensed ratably over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The forfeiture assumption is

ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may affect the timing of the total amount of expense recognized over the vesting period. The service period is the period over which the employee performs the related services, which is normally the same as the vesting period. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Equity-based awards that have the potential to be settled in cash at the election of the employee or prior to the reorganization related to redeemable partnership units are classified as liabilities (“Liability Awards”) and are adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

The Company accounts for leases under ASU No. 2016-02, “Topic 842, Leases” (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ~~Topic~~ASC 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishesestablished a right-of-use model (“ROU”) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases ~~will be~~are classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the consolidated statement of operations.

The new standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and the Company adopted this standard on this date. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) the effective date of the standard or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. The Company elected to use the effective date as its date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods prior to January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients as part of transition accounting. The Company expects to elect the “package of practical expedients”, which allows the Company to avoid reassessing its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs under the new standard. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as these are not applicable to the Company.

This standard had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The most significant changes relate to (1) the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for its office equipment and real estate operating leases and (2) providing significant new disclosures about the Company’s leasing activities.

Upon adoption, the Company recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $44.0 million, with corresponding ROU and other assets based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company used an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date of the lease in determining the present value of lease payments. In determining the ROU asset and lease liability at lease inception, the lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting for leases. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for office equipment leases. For those current and prospective leases that qualify as short-term, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Silvercrest and SFS are subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which requires an asset and liability approach to the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. SLP is not subject to federal and state income taxes, since all income, gains and losses are passed through to its partners. SLP is, however, subject to New York City unincorporated business tax. With respect to the Company’s incorporated entities, the annual tax rate is based on the income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Judgment is required in determining the tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. The tax effects of any uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments—Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities."~~ Although the ASU retains many current requirements, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. Some of the amendments in ASU 2016-01 include the following: (1) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (3) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and (4) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value, among others. ASU 2016-01 became effective on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Accounting for Credit Losses” which amends the Board’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The ASU adds to U.S. GAAP an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. This amendment is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Cash Flow Classification” which amends the guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. ~~The amendment was~~became effective for the Company on January 1, ~~2018.~~2020. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted Cash” which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. ~~The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

In January 2017, ~~The FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 85): Clarifying~~ the Definition of a Business”. The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2019 and interim reporting periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. ~~The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~In January 2017, The~~ FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing. An entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2021 and interim reporting periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company ~~expects~~elected to early adopt ASU 2017-04 relating to our impairment test performed during the ~~adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”. The ASU conforms the derecognition guidance on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in the new revenue standard (ASC 606, as amended). Subtopic 610-20 was issued as part of the new revenue standard. It provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers. The new guidance defines “in substance nonfinancial assets,” unifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets, eliminates rules specifically addressing sales of real estate, removes exceptions to the financial asset derecognition model, and clarifies the accounting for contributions of nonfinancial assets to joint ventures. ~~This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018.~~year ended December 31, 2019. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial ~~Statements~~.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 “Compensation – Stock”. The ASU amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The ASU provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. ~~This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018.~~ ~~The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~.Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement ~~That~~that is a Service Contract.” The ASU provides guidance for entities to evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement which includes a software license. ASU 2018-15 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” which applies to all entities, subject to meeting certain criteria, that have contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. This ASU is effective for all public entities ~~for fiscal years~~ beginning ~~after~~March 12, 2020 through December ~~15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.~~31, 2022. The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the SEC issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain disclosure requirements that have become redundant, overlapping, outdated or superseded. The rule became effective for the Company’s current quarterly report, with the ability to adopt the changes in the current period, or defer until 2019. The Company elected to defer the changes to the interim period disclosure rules related to changes to shareholders’ equity until its first quarter report in 2019.

On April 12, 2019, SAMG LLC and SLP entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina ~~(the “Principals”~~(together, the “Principals of Cortina”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services (the “Cortina Acquisition”).

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44,937, 80% of which was agreed to be paid in cash at closing by SAMG LLC, and 20% of which was agreed to be paid by SLP in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals of Cortina at closing of Class B Units in SLP, in each case subject to certain adjustments as described in the Purchase Agreement.

On July 1, 2019, the acquisition was completed pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. At closing, SAMG LLC paid to Cortina an aggregate principal amount of $33,577 in cash, and SLP paid an additional $8,952, in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals of Cortina of 662,713 Class B Units in SLP. The $33,577 paid in cash represented $35,072 in consideration, partially offset by net closing credits due to SAMG LLC for reimbursable expenses from Cortina.

In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26,209 to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals of Cortina receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of SLP in potential earn-out payments over the next four years. SAMG LLC determined that the preliminary fair value of contingent consideration pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement whereby the sellers of Cortina are potentially entitled to two retention payments and one growth payment contingent upon the achievement of various revenue targets is $13,800. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The income approach was used to determine the fair value of these payments, by estimating a range of likely expected outcomes and payouts given these outcomes. The potential payouts were estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation and discounted back to their present values using a risk-free discount rate adjusted to account for SAMG LLC’s credit or counterparty risk to arrive at the present value of the contingent consideration payments. The discount rate for the contingent consideration payments was based on the revenue cost of capital for Cortina’s revenue.

The first retention payment, due if revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 is greater than or equal to 95% of the acquired revenue of $13,027 which represents Cortina’s annual revenue run-rate as of closing (“Acquired Revenue”), is equal to $3,370. If revenue for the period is equal to 75% or less of the Acquired Revenue, there is no0 first retention payment, and if revenue for the period is between 75% and 95%, the first retention payment will be determined using linear interpolation between $0 and $3,370.

The second retention payment is based on revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, with a revenue threshold between 85% and 105% of Acquired Revenue and a maximum retention payment of $5,617. If revenue for the period is

equal to 85% or less of the Acquired Revenue, there is no0 second retention payment, and if revenue for the period is between 85% and 105%, the second retention payment will be determined using linear interpolation between $0 and $5,617.

The growth payment is based on revenue for the 12-month period from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, with a revenue threshold between 95% and 140% of Acquired Revenue and a maximum payment of $17,222. If revenue for the period is equal to 95% or less of the Acquired Revenue, there is no0 growth payment, and if revenue for the period is between 95% and 140%, the growth payment will be determined using linear interpolation between $0 and $17,222.

A fair value adjustment to contingent purchase price consideration of $1,700 and ($500) was recorded during the three and nine months September 30, 2020, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the quarter then ended. SAMG LLC has a liability of ~~$13,800~~$13,500 and $14,000 as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cortina Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for contingent consideration.

In connection with their receipt of the equity consideration, the Principals of Cortina became subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the limited partnership agreement of SLP and are entitled to distributions consistent with SLP’s distribution policy. In addition, the Principals of Cortina became parties to the ~~Exchange Agreement,~~exchange agreement between the Company and its principals, which governs the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company (the “Exchange Agreement”), the ~~Resale~~resale and ~~Registration Rights Agreement,~~registration rights agreement between the Company and its principals, which provides the Principals of Cortina with liquidity with respect to shares of Class A common stock of the Company received in exchange for Class B Units (the “Resale and Registration Rights Agreement”), and the TRA of the Company, which entitles the Principals of Cortina to share in a portion of the tax benefit received by the Company upon the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company.

The Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.

The strategic acquisition of Cortina, a long-standing innovative and high-caliber growth equity asset management firm, establishes a growth equity capability for the Company. Furthermore, the Company gains investment professionals that have significantexperience and knowledge of the industry and establishes a presence in the Midwest.

Cortina revenue and income before provision for income taxes for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 that are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations are $~~3,182~~ 3,020 and $1,355, and $3,182 and $976, respectively. Cortina revenue and income before provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 that are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations are $8,426 and $3,428, and $3,182 and $976, respectively.

During the ~~first~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company incurred $5 and $90, respectively, in costs related to the Cortina Acquisition, and has included these in general, administrative and other in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company incurred $1,147 in costs related to the Cortina Acquisition, and has included these in general, administrative and other in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The Company accounted for the acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. The method for determining relative fair value varied depending on the type of asset or liability and involved management making significant estimates related to assumptions such as future growth rates used to produce financial projections for Cortina and the selection of unobservable inputs and other assumptions. The inputs used in establishing the fair value are in most cases unobservable and reflect the Company's own judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The following table summarizes the amounts ~~preliminarily~~ allocated to acquired assets and assumed liabilities. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill and intangible assets.


Total fair value of tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed	$	—	$	—
Goodwill		36,324		36,324
Customer relationships (15 years)		21,500		21,500
Total purchase consideration	$	57,824	$	57,824

The ~~preliminary valuation of acquired intangible assets is in the process of being prepared by an independent appraisal firm. The initial~~ purchase price allocations ~~are preliminary and may be adjusted for changes in estimates~~were finalized as of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company expects that the purchase price allocations will be finalized by the time it files its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2019.

The Company believes the recorded goodwill is supported by the anticipated revenues and expected synergies of integrating the operations of Cortina into the Company. Most of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The pro forma information below represents consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition of Cortina occurred on January 1, ~~2019 and January 1, 2018.~~2019. The pro forma information has been included for comparative purposes and is not indicative of results of operations of the Company had the acquisitions occurred as of January 1, 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ nor is it necessarily indicative of future results.

On December 13, 2018, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Neosho Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho (together, the “Principals of Neosho”), to acquire certain assets of Neosho. The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of investment management and advisory services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) a cash payment of $399 (net of cash acquired) and (2) Class B units of SLP issued to the Principals of Neosho with a value equal to $20 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,686, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved. SAMG LLC will make a payment of $300 to the Principals of Neosho on the first anniversary of the closing date. SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Neosho as soon as practicable following December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $100 and (ii) the product obtained by multiplying (x) 50% by (y) the revenue of Neosho as of such payment date less the revenue of Neosho as of the immediately preceding payment date for the prior year. Earnout payments will be paid 75% in cash and 25% in equity. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

The Company has a liability of ~~$1,686~~$1,103 and $1,403 related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Neosho Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, for contingent consideration. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company made contingent purchase price payments to Neosho of $300.

On December 15, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Cappiccille & Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Cappiccille” or the “Seller”), and Michael Cappiccille (the “Principal”), to acquire certain assets of Cappiccille. The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 11, 2016 and is referred to herein as the “Cappiccille Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of tax services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principal. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of a cash payment of $148. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $354, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved. SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principal as soon as practicable following December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and during 2020, in an amount equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the business and assets of Cappiccille, based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2016 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille for the period between the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition and December 31, 2016 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille Acquisition for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes

in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the

weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

A fair value adjustment to contingent purchase price consideration of $0 and $83 was recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the quarter then ended. The Company has a liability of ~~$126~~$70 and ~~$231~~$101 related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cappiccille Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, for contingent consideration. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company made contingent purchase price payments to Cappiccille of $113 and $105, respectively.

On March 30, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Jamison Eaton & Wood, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (“Jamison” or the “Seller”), and Keith Wood, Ernest Cruikshank, III, William F. Gadsden and Frederick E. Thalmann, Jr., each such individual a principal of Jamison (together, the “Principals of Jamison”), to acquire certain assets of Jamison. The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2015 and is referred to herein as the “Jamison Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, an investment adviser, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principals of Jamison. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principals of Jamison an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) cash payments in the aggregate amount of $3,550 (the “Closing Cash Payment”), (2) a promissory note issued to the Seller in the principal amount of $394, with an interest rate of 5% per annum (the “Seller Note”), (3) promissory notes in varying amounts issued to each of the Principals of Jamison for an aggregated total amount of $1,771, each with an interest rate of 5% per annum (together, the “Principals of Jamison Notes”) and (4) Class B units of SLP (the “Class B Units”) issued to the Principals of Jamison with a value equal to $3,562 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest (together, the “Equity Consideration”). The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,429, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved. SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Jamison as soon as practicable following December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and during 2020, in an amount equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the business and assets of Jamison (the “Jamison Business”), based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2015 shall be equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition and December 31, 2015 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition. The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected EBITDA for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected EBITDA was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

A fair value adjustment to contingent purchase price consideration of $0 and $70 was recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the quarter then ended. The Company has a liability of ~~$204~~$160 and ~~$524~~$418 as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Jamison Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for contingent consideration. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company made contingent purchase price payments to Jamison of $328 and $320, respectively. The six months ended June 30, 2020 represents the final measurement period of the Jamison contingent purchase price consideration.

In connection with their receipt of the Equity Consideration, the Principals of Jamison became subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the limited partnership agreement of SLP and are entitled to distributions consistent with SLP’s distribution policy. In addition, the Principals of Jamison became parties to the Exchange Agreement, which governs the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company, the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement, which provides the Principals of Jamison with liquidity with respect to shares of Class A common stock of the Company received in exchange for Class B Units, and the TRA of the Company, which entitles the Principals of Jamison to share in a portion of the tax benefit received by the Company upon the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company.

The Asset Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.

The strategic acquisition of Jamison, a long-standing and highly regarded investment boutique, strengthened the Company’s presence in the greater New York market and the Company gained investment managers that have significantexperience and knowledge of the

industry. Jamison’s clients gained access to the Company’s complete investment management, wealth planning and reporting capabilities, including proprietary value equity and fixed income disciplines and alternative investment advisory services.

The Company believes the recorded goodwill is supported by the anticipated revenues and expected synergies of integrating the operations of Jamison into the Company. The goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Investments include $16 and ~~$1,493~~$1,781 as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, representing the Company’s interests in the Silvercrest Funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates. The Company’s financial interest in these funds can range in amounts up to 2% of the net assets of the funds. Despite the Company’s insignificant financial interest, the Company applies the equity method to account for its interests in affiliated investment funds because it exercises significant influence over these funds as the Company typically serves as the general partner, managing member or equivalent for these funds. During 2007, the Silvercrest Funds granted rights to the unaffiliated investors in each respective fund to provide that a simple majority of the fund’s unaffiliated investors will have the right, without cause, to remove the general partner or equivalent of that fund or to accelerate the liquidation date of that fund in accordance with certain procedures. At September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company determined that none of the Silvercrest Funds were required to be consolidated. The Company’s involvement with these entities began on the dates that they were formed, which range from July 2003 to July 2014.

GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment, the characteristics specific to the investment and the state of the marketplace including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in an orderly market generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given investment is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

At September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company did ~~not~~0t have any financial assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the exception of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition earnouts.

For business acquisitions, the Company recognizes the fair value of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets, and estimated contingent consideration at the acquisition date as part of purchase price. This fair value measurement is based on unobservable(Level 3) inputs.

The following table represents changes in the fair value of estimated contingent consideration for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the nine months ended September 30, 2020:

Estimated contingent consideration is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Payments of contingent consideration are included in earn-outs paid related to acquisitions completed on or after January 1, 2009 in financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In determining fair value of the estimated contingent consideration, the acquired business’ future performance is estimated using financial projections for the acquired business. These financial projections, as well as alternative scenarios of financial performance, are measured against the performance targets specified in each respective acquisition agreement. In addition, discount rates are established based on the cost of debt and the cost of equity. The Company uses the Monte Carlo Simulation Model to determine the fair value of the Company’s estimated contingent consideration.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s estimated contingent consideration are the forecasted growth rates over the measurement period and discount rates. Significant increases or decreases in the Company’s forecasted growth rates over the measurement period or discount rates would result in a higher or lower fair value measurement.

Inputs used in the fair value measurement of estimated contingent consideration at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are summarized below:

Please refer to Note 3. Acquisitions for more details on contingent consideration related to acquisition earnouts.

At September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, financial instruments that are not held at fair value are categorized in the table below:

	September 30, 2019				December 31, 2018							September 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy			Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,841	$	40,841	$	69,283	$	69,283		Level I	(1)	$	48,171	$	48,171	$	52,832	$	52,832		Level 1	(1)
Investments	$	16	$	16	$	1,493	$	1,493		N/A	(2)	$	16	$	16	$	1,781	$	1,781		N/A	(2)

Financial liabilities:
Borrowings under credit facility												$	13,500	$	13,500	$	16,200	$	16,200		Level 2	(3)

The following is a summary of receivables as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Management and advisory fees receivable	$	3,885		$	3,358		$	3,442		$	4,981
Unbilled receivables		5,601			3,036			5,746			4,596
Other receivables		2			2,249			2			2
Receivables		9,488			8,643			9,190			9,579
Allowance for doubtful receivables		(621	)		(621	)		(548	)		(621	)
Receivables, net	$	8,867		$	8,022		$	8,642		$	8,958

The following is a summary of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Leasehold improvements	$	7,688		$	5,229		$	7,880		$	7,783
Furniture and equipment		6,409			6,022			7,159			6,541
Artwork		491			483			502			502
Total cost		14,588			11,734			15,541			14,826
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(8,569	)		(8,298	)		(9,911	)		(8,811	)
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	6,019		$	3,436		$	5,630		$	6,015

Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $279 and ~~2018 was~~ $267, ~~and $179,~~ respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $838 and ~~2018 was~~ $815, ~~and $567,~~ respectively.

During the ~~three and~~ nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company wrote off leased assets of $0$209 and $310, ~~that were fully depreciated as of September 30, 2019. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company disposed of computer equipment~~ with ~~a cost of $989 and~~ accumulated depreciation of ~~$952.~~

The following is a summary of the changes to the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and the year ended December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Beginning
Gross balance	$	42,583		$	42,583		$	81,090		$	42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance		25,168			25,168			63,675			25,168
Acquisition of Neosho		2,183			─			0			2,183
Acquisition of Cortina		36,324			─			0			36,324
Ending
Gross balance		81,090			42,583			81,090			81,090
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance	$	63,675		$	25,168		$	63,675		$	63,675

The following is a summary of intangible assets as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total			Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2020										$	44,060		$	2,467		$	46,527
Disposal											—			(6	)		(6	)
Balance, September 30, 2020											44,060			2,461			46,521
Useful lives											10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2020											(14,833	)		(2,408	)		(17,241	)
Amortization expense											(2,011	)		(58	)		(2,069	)
Disposal											—			5			5
Balance, September 30, 2020											(16,844	)		(2,461	)		(19,305	)
Net book value										$	27,216		$	—		$	27,216
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027		$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Acquisition of Cortina		21,500			—			21,500			21,500			—			21,500
Balance, September 30, 2019		44,060			2,467			46,527
Balance, December 31, 2019											44,060			2,467			46,527
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years						10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2019		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Amortization expense		(1,280	)		(121	)		(1,401	)		(1,946	)		(161	)		(2,107	)
Balance, September 30, 2019		(14,167	)		(2,368	)		(16,535	)
Net book value	$	29,893		$	99		$	29,992
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2018	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, December 31, 2018		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2018		(11,367	)		(2,082	)		(13,449	)
Amortization expense		(1,520	)		(165	)		(1,685	)
Balance, December 31, 2018		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Balance, December 31, 2019											(14,833	)		(2,408	)		(17,241	)
Net Book Value	$	9,673		$	220		$	9,893		$	29,227		$	59		$	29,286

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was ~~$705~~$664 and ~~$420~~$705 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets was ~~$1,401~~$2,069 and ~~$1,265~~$1,401 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company wrote off other intangible assets related to a non-compete agreement with one of the principals of Jamison which was no longer in effect at September 30, 2020 with a cost of $6 and ~~2018, respectively.~~the related accumulated amortization of $5.

Amortization related to the Company’s finite life intangible assets is scheduled to be expensed over the next five years and thereafter as follows:

2019 (remainder of)	$	706
2020		2,733
2020 (remainder of)			$	663
2021		2,629		2,629
2022		2,575		2,575
2023		2,416		2,416
2024				2,289
Thereafter		18,933		16,644
Total	$	29,992	$	27,216

On June 24, 2013, the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a $15.0 million credit facility with City National Bank. The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. are the borrowers under such facility and Silvercrest L.P. guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by certain assets of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. The credit facility ~~consists~~consisted of a $7.5 million delayed draw term loan that was scheduled to mature on June 24, 2025 and a $7.5 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on June 21, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the credit facility was amended to increase the term loan by $18.0 million to $25.5 million, extend the draw date on the term loan facility to July 1, 2024, extend the maturity date of the term loan to July 1, 2026 and increase the revolving credit facility by $2.5 million to $10.0 million. On June ~~20, 2019,~~19, 2020, the revolving credit facility was ~~extended~~further amended to extend the maturity date to June 19, ~~2020.~~2021. The loan bears interest at either (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.25 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 2.75 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option. On July 1, 2019, the term loan was amended to increase the facility by $18.0 million to $25.5 million, to extend the draw date to July 1, 2024 and to extend the maturity date to July 1, 2026. The borrowers are able to draw up to the full amount of the term loan through July 1, 2024. Borrowings under the term loan on or prior to June 30, 2021 are payable in 20 equal quarterly installments. Borrowings under the term loan after June 30, 2021 will be payable in equal quarterly installments through the maturity date. The credit facility contains restrictions on, among other things, (i) incurrence of additional debt, (ii) creating liens on certain assets, (iii) making certain investments, (iv) consolidating, merging or otherwise disposing of substantially all of our assets, (v) the sale of certain assets, and (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates. In addition, the credit facility contains certain financial covenants including a test on discretionary assets under management, maximum debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change in control which includes a person or group of persons acting together acquiring more than 30% of the total voting securities of Silvercrest. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under the credit facility as of September 30, 2020.

As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company did ~~not~~0t have any outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had ~~$17.1 million~~$13,500 and ~~$0,~~$16,200, respectively, outstanding under the term loan. There was no0 accrued but unpaid interest as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 or December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Interest expense, which also includes amortization of deferred financing fees, incurred on the revolving credit facility and term loan for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $117 and ~~2018 was~~ $237, respectively.Interest expense, which also includes amortization of deferred financing fees, incurred on the revolving credit facility and ~~$7, respectively, and~~term loan for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $437 and ~~2018 was~~ $250, ~~and $15,~~ respectively.

The Company leases office space pursuant to operating leases that are subject to specific escalation clauses. Rent expense charged to operations for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 amounted to ~~$1,566~~$1,597 and ~~$1,450,~~$1,566, respectively. The Company received sub-lease income from sub-tenants during the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 of $38 and ~~2018 of~~ $28, ~~and $29,~~ respectively. Therefore, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, net rent expense amounted to ~~$1,538~~$1,559 and ~~$1,421,~~$1,538, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company leases office space pursuant to operating leases that are subject to specific escalation clauses. Rent expense charged to operations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 amounted to ~~$4,625~~$4,777 and ~~$4,348,~~$4,625, respectively. The Company received sub-lease income from sub-tenants during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 of $115 and ~~2018 of~~ $98, ~~and $187,~~ respectively. Therefore, for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, net rent expense amounted to ~~$4,527~~$4,662 and ~~$4,161,~~$4,527, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As security for performance under the leases, the Company is required to maintain letters of credit in favor of the landlord totaling $506 as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Furthermore, the Company maintains an $80 letter of credit in favor of its Boston landlord. Both are collateralized by the Company’s revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

In March 2014, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office space in Richmond, VA. The lease commenced on May 1, 2014 and ~~expires~~had an original expiration date of July 31, 2019. The lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of three months. Monthly rent expense is $5. The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $3. In September 2016, the Company entered into Lease Amendment Number One (“Amendment Number One”) to expand its space and extend its lease. This expansion was to occur on or about October 1, 2017, and the lease was extended to November 30, 2024. The lease was further amended on January 16, 2018 (“Amendment Number Two”) to update the expansion date to January 12, 2018 and to extend the term of the lease to November 30, 2028. The amended lease provides for a rent credit of $40. Monthly rent expense under the amended lease is $10.

In June 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Charlottesville, VA. The lease commenced on June 30, 2015 and expired, as amended, on June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. On June 6, 2019, the Company extended this lease for three years, with the new term beginning on July 1, 2019 and expiring on June 30, 2022. Monthly rent expense is $2. The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $2.

In connection with the Jamison Acquisition, the Company assumed lease agreements for office space in Bedminster and Princeton, NJ. The Bedminster lease, as extended, expires on March 31, 2022. Monthly rent expense on this lease is $11. The Princeton lease, as extended, expired on April 30, 2016. Monthly rent expense on this lease was $5. Both leases are subject to escalation clauses, and the Bedminster lease provided for a rent-free period of four months.

In December 2015, the Company extended its lease related to its New York City office space. The amended lease commenced on October 1, 2017 and expires on September 30, 2028. The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provided for a rent-free period of twelve months and for tenant improvements of up to $2,080. Monthly rent under this extension is $446.

In January 2016, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Princeton, NJ. The lease commenced April 23, 2016 and expires on August 31, 2022. This lease replaces the Princeton lease discussed above that expired on April 30, 2016. Monthly rent expense on this lease is $6. The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provides for a rent-free period of five months.

With the Cappiccille Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in Livingston, NJ. The lease was month-to-month. Monthly rent expense was $2. This lease was terminated in January ~~2019.~~2019.

In January 2018, the Company extended its lease related to its Boston, MA office space. The amended lease commenced on January 1, 2018 and expires on April 30, 2023. The lease provides for a rent-free period of one month. Monthly rent under this extension is $33.

With the Neosho Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in La Jolla, CA. The lease ~~expires~~expired on January 31, 2020. Monthly rent expense was $3. On November 5, 2019, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in San Diego, CA. The lease commenced on February 1, 2020 and expires on June 30, 2025. The lease is ~~$3.~~subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of four months and for tenant improvements of up to $27. Monthly rent expense under this lease is $12.

With the Cortina Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in Milwaukee, WI. The lease was extended on June 17, 2020 and expires December 31, ~~2020.~~2022. Monthly rent expense is $12.

The components of lease expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:

					Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2019		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019		2020		2019		2020		2019
Operating Lease Cost	$	1,496	$	4,436	$	1,532	$	1,496	$	4,591	$	4,436
Finance Lease Cost:
Financing Lease Cost:
Amortization of ROU assets		25		79		26		25		89		79
Interest on lease liabilities		2		6		3		2		7		6
Total	$	27	$	85		29		27		96		85

~~The following table summarizes the maturities of~~Future minimum lease ~~liabilities at September 30, 2019:~~payments and rentals under lease agreements for office space are as follows:

	Operating Leases		Non-cancellable Subleases			Operating Lease Liabilities			Operating Leases		Non-cancellable Subleases			Operating Lease Liabilities
Remainder of 2019	$	1,593	$	(8	)	$	1,585
2020		6,342		(34	)		6,308
Remainder of 2020									$	1,625	$	(38	)	$	1,587
2021		6,222		(35	)		6,187			6,370		(35	)		6,335
2022		6,091		(35	)		6,056			6,244		(35	)		6,209
2023		5,770		(6	)		5,764			5,928		(6	)		5,922
2024										6,008		—			6,008
Thereafter		27,827		—			27,827			22,067		—			22,067
Total	$	53,845	$	(118	)		53,727		$	48,242	$	(114	)	$	48,128
Less imputed interest							(12,807	)
Total remaining liabilities						$	40,920
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (months)							104.7								91.8
Weighted-average discount rate							4.3	%							4.3	%

The Company has finance leases for ~~certain~~the following office ~~equipment. The Company entered into~~equipment: (i) afive-year finance lease agreement for two copiers totaling $152 with monthly minimum lease payments of $3, which began on February 1, 2017 and continue through January 31, 2022, (ii) a ~~telephone system during 2014. The amount financed was $321~~three-year lease agreement for four copiers totaling $72 with monthly minimum payments of $2, which began on July 1, 2017 and ~~the~~continue through June 30, 2020, (iii) a three-year lease ~~has a term~~agreement for one copier totaling $11 with monthly minimum payments of ~~five years,~~$0.3, which began on March 1, ~~2014. Monthly~~2018 and continue through February 28, 2021, (iv) a three-year lease agreement for one copier totaling $13 with monthly minimum payments of $0.4, which began on March 1, 2019 and continue through February 28, 2022, (v) a 39-month lease agreement for one copier totaling $12 with monthly minimum lease payments ~~were $5,~~of $0.4, which began on March 1, 2019 and ~~continued~~continue through ~~November 30, 2018. On June 30, 2015, the Company~~May 31, 2022, (vi) a lease agreement for one copier that was assumed ~~certain finance leases for equipment totaling $253~~ as part of the ~~Jamison Acquisition. In July 2015, the Company entered into a finance~~Cortina Acquisition with monthly minimum lease ~~for a copier. The amount financed was $21 and the lease has a term~~payments of ~~three years,~~$1, which began on July 1, ~~2015. Monthly~~2019 and continue through November 30, 2021, (vii) a three year lease agreement for two copiers totaling $51 with monthly minimum lease payments ~~were~~of $1, ~~and continued through June 30, 2018. In October 2015, the Company entered in a finance lease for a copier. The amount financed was $18 and the lease has a term of three years,~~ which began on ~~November~~August 1, ~~2015. Monthly minimum lease payments were $1,~~2019 and ~~continued~~continue through ~~October~~July 31, ~~2018. In January 2017, the Company entered into~~2022, (viii) a ~~finance~~five year lease agreement for a ~~copier. The amount financed was $11 and the~~copier totaling $82 with monthly minimum lease ~~has a term~~payments of ~~two years,~~$1, which began on ~~January~~May 1, 2017. Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through December 31, 2018. In January 2017, the Company entered into a finance lease agreement for two copiers. The amount financed was $152 and the lease has a term of five years, which began on February 1, 2017. Monthly minimum lease payments are $3,2020 and continue through ~~January 31, 2022. In July 2017, the Company entered into~~April 30, 2025 , (ix) a ~~lease agreement for four copiers. The amount financed was $72 and the lease has a term of~~ three ~~years, which began on July 1, 2017. Monthly minimum lease payments are $2, and continue through June 30, 2020. In March 2018, the Company entered into a~~year lease agreement for a ~~copier. The amount financed was $11 and the~~copier totaling $59 with minimum monthly lease ~~has a term~~payments of ~~three years,~~$2, which began on ~~March~~June 1, 2018. Monthly minimum lease payments are $0.3, and continue through February 28, 2021. In March 2019, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a copier. The amount financed was $13 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on March 1, 2019. Monthly minimum lease payments are $0.4, and continue through February 28, 2022. In March 2019, the Company entered into an additional lease agreement for a copier. The amount financed was $12 and the lease has a term of 39 months, which began on March 1, 2019. Monthly minimum lease payments are $0.4,2020 and continue through May 31, ~~2022. In July 2019, the Company assumed~~2023, (x) a ~~lease agreement for a copier as part of the acquisition of Cortina. Monthly minimum lease payments are $1 and continue through November 2021. In August 2019, the Company entered into a~~three year lease agreement for two ~~copiers. The amount financed was $41 and the~~copiers totaling $43 with minimum monthly lease ~~has a term~~payments of ~~three years,~~$1, which began on August ~~1, 2019. Monthly minimum lease payments are $1,~~20, 2020 and continue through ~~July 31, 2022.~~August 19, 2023 and (xi) a three year lease agreement for two copiers totaling $39 with minimum monthly lease payments of $1, which began on August 20, 2020 and continue through August 19, 2023. The aggregate principal balance of finance leases was ~~$206~~$289 and ~~$188~~$196 as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The assets relating to finance leases that are included in equipment as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 are as follows:

	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Finance lease assets included in furniture and equipment	$	660		$	605		$	417		$	679
Finance lease assets included in software		—			58			—			—
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(456	)		(462	)		(133	)		(481	)
	$	204		$	201		$	284		$	198

Depreciation expense relating to finance lease assets was ~~$25~~$26 and ~~$40~~$25 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Depreciation expense relating to finance lease assets was ~~$78~~$88 and ~~$101~~$78 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

During the three and ~~2018,~~nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company wrote off leased assets of $209 and $310, with accumulated depreciation of $180 and $310, respectively.

	Future Minimum Lease Commitments			Future Minimum Lease Commitments
Remainder of 2019	$	30
2020		100
Remainder of 2020				$	41
2021		63			126
2022		13			80
2023					44
2024					16
Thereafter					5
Total	$	206		$	312
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (months)		24.9			34.1
Weighted-average discount rate		4.5	%		4.0	%

SLP historically made, and will continue to make, distributions of its net income to the holders of its partnership units for income tax purposes as required under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and also made, and will continue to make, additional distributions of net income under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement. Partnership distributions totaled ~~$1,626~~$1,497 and ~~$1,529,~~$1,626, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~

respectively. Partnership distributions totaled ~~$7,385~~$6,521 and ~~$6,541,~~$7,385, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018, respectively~~respectively.

Pursuant to SLP’s Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, partner incentive allocations are treated as distributions of net income. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations was generally allocated to the partners based on their pro rata ownership. Net income allocation is subject to the recovery of the allocated losses of prior periods. Distributions of partner incentive allocations of net income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 amounted to ~~$27,199~~$27,236 and ~~$24,935,~~$27,199, respectively. The distributions are included in non-controlling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. The Company treats SLP’s partner incentive allocations as compensation expense and accrues such amounts when earned. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, SLP accrued partner incentive allocations of ~~$7,115~~$7,121 and ~~$7,154,~~$7,115, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, SLP accrued partner incentive allocations of ~~$18,766~~$20,055 and ~~$21,055,~~$18,766, respectively.

Shares at September 30, 2019

Shares at September 30, 2020

Authorized

Outstanding

Voting Rights

Economic
Rights

Authorized

Outstanding

Voting Rights

Economic
Rights

Common shares

Class A, par value $0.01 per share

50,000,000

9,180,013

1 vote per share (1), (2)

All (1), (2)

50,000,000

9,544,607

1 vote per share (1), (2)

All (1), (2)

Class B, par value $0.01 per share

25,000,000

5,180,883

1 vote per share (3), (4)

None (3), (4)

25,000,000

4,827,731

1 vote per share (3), (4)

None (3), (4)

Preferred shares

Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share

10,000,000

—

See footnote (5) below

10,000,000

—

See footnote (5) below

Silvercrest is dependent on cash generated by SLP to fund any dividends. Generally, SLP will distribute its profits to all of its partners, including Silvercrest, based on the proportionate ownership each holds in SLP. Silvercrest will fund dividends to its stockholders from its proportionate share of those distributions after provision for its income taxes and other obligations.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Silvercrest issued the following shares:

In ~~January 2019, the Company issued 1,516 shares of Class B common stock to certain Principals of Neosho in connection with the Neosho Acquisition.~~

~~In March 2019,~~February 2020, the Company redeemed from certain existing partners ~~17,074~~155,224 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the ~~resale~~Resale and ~~registration rights agreement~~Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and its principals.

In ~~May 2019,~~March 2020, the Company redeemed from certain existing partners ~~84,268~~20,662 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the ~~resale~~Resale and ~~registration rights agreement~~Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and its principals.

In May ~~2019, the Company issued 1,896 shares of Class A common stock and 948 shares of Class B common stock upon the vesting of restricted stock units.~~

~~In June 2019,~~2020, the Company redeemed from certain existing partners ~~2,386~~7,355 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the ~~resale~~Resale and ~~registration rights agreement~~Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and its principals.

In ~~July 2019,~~May 2020, the Company issued ~~662,713~~1,896 shares of Class A common stock and 9,546 shares of Class B common stock ~~to certain Principals~~upon the vesting of ~~Cortina in connection with the Cortina Acquisition.~~restricted stock units.

In ~~August 2019,~~June 2020, the Company redeemed from certain existing partners ~~556,293~~5,400 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the ~~resale~~Resale and ~~registration rights agreement~~Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and its principals.

In August ~~2019,~~2020, the Company ~~issued 241,624~~redeemed from certain existing partners 24,191 shares of Class B common stock ~~upon~~in connection with the ~~vesting~~exchange of ~~restricted~~a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock ~~units.~~pursuant to the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and its principals.

The total amount of shares of Class B common stock outstanding and held by principals equals the number of Class B units those individuals hold in SLP. Shares of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, Silvercrest will issue to the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by Silvercrest if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP, the terms of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of Silvercrest, or otherwise.

Partner contributions to SLP are made in cash, in the form of five or six year interest-bearing promissory notes and/or in the form of nine year interest-bearing limited recourse promissory notes. Limited recourse promissory notes were issued in January 2008 and August 2009 with interest rates of 3.53% and 2.77%, respectively. The recourse limitation includes a stated percentage of the initial principal amount of the limited recourse note plus a stated percentage of the accreted principal amount as of the date upon which all amounts due are paid in full plus all costs and expenses required to be paid by the borrower and all amounts required to be paid pursuant to a pledge agreement associated with each note issued. Certain notes receivable are payable in annual installments and are collateralized by SLP’s units that are purchased with the note. Notes receivable from partners are reflected as a reduction of non-controlling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Notes receivable from partners are as follows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and the year ended December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Beginning balance	$	924		$	1,918		$	645		$	924
New note receivable issued to partners		—			100
Repayment of notes		(291	)		(1,119	)		(300	)		(291	)
Interest accrued and capitalized on notes receivable		9			25			5			12
Ending balance	$	642		$	924		$	350		$	645

Full recourse notes receivable from partners as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 are ~~$642~~$350 and ~~$924,~~$645, respectively. There were no0 limited recourse notes receivable from partners as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 or December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. There is no0 allowance for credit losses on notes receivable from partners as of September 30, ~~2019 and~~2020 or December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

During the first nine months of ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company provided services to the following, which operate as feeder funds investing through master-feeder or mini-master feeder structures:

The Company also provides services to the following, which operate and invest separately as stand-alone funds:

Pursuant to agreements with the above entities, the Company provides investment advisory services and receives an annual management fee of 0% to 1.75% of assets under management and a performance fee or allocation of 0% to 10% of the above entities’ net appreciation over a high-water mark.

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company earned from the above activities management fee income, which is included in “Management and advisory fees” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, of ~~$1,312~~$1,165 and ~~$1,638,~~$1,312, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company earned from the above activities management fee income, which is included in “Management and advisory fees” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, of ~~$3,880~~$3,485 and ~~$4,883,~~$3,880, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company was owed ~~$1,549~~$1,806 and ~~$1,233,~~$1,697, respectively, from its various funds, which is included in Due from Silvercrest Funds on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company earned management and advisory fees of ~~$387~~$330 and ~~$301,~~$387, respectively, from assets managed on behalf of certain of its employees. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company earned management and advisory fees of ~~$1,062~~$995 and ~~$885,~~$1,062, respectively, from assets managed on behalf of certain of its employees. As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company is owed approximately ~~$82~~$62 and ~~$31~~$137, respectively, from certain of its employees, which is included in Receivables, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had net deferred tax assets of ~~$12,731,~~$11,523, which is recorded as a deferred tax asset of ~~$12,913~~$11,646 specific to Silvercrest which consists primarily of assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets related to its acquisition of partnership units of SLP, a deferred tax liability of ~~$104~~$63 specific to SLP which consists primarily of assets related to deferred rent expenses offset in part by amounts for differences in the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets and a deferred tax liability of ~~$78~~$60 related to the corporate activity of SFS which is primarily related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets. Of the total net deferred taxes at September 30, ~~2019, $66~~2020, $41 of the net deferred tax liabilities relate to non-controlling interests. These amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other assets and deferred tax and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition, respectively.

As of December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of ~~$12,093,~~$13,103, which is recorded as a net deferred tax asset of ~~$12,206~~$13,190 specific to Silvercrest, which consists primarily of net assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangibles related to its acquisition of partnership units of SLP, a net deferred tax liability of ~~$20~~$14 specific to SLP which consists primarily of liabilities related to differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets, and a

net deferred tax liability of ~~$93~~$73 related to the corporate activity of SFS which is primarily related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets.

The current tax expense was ~~$776~~$1,576 and ~~$1,397~~$776 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Of the amount for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019, $428~~2020, $953 relates to Silvercrest’s corporate tax expense, ~~$347~~$622 relates to SLP’s state and local liability and $1 relates to SFS’s corporate tax expense. The deferred tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was ($217) and ~~2018 was~~ $725, ~~and ($84),~~ respectively. When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 is $1,359 and ~~2018 is~~ $1,501, ~~and $1,313,~~ respectively. The discrete tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020, and 2019 ~~includes~~was ($99) and $240, respectively. For 2020, this represents a reduction to tax expense associated with an unfavorable fair value adjustment to contingent purchase price consideration related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cortina Acquisition.

The current tax expense was $2,817 and $1,798 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Of the amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, $1,388 relates to Silvercrest’s corporate tax expense, $1,427 relates to SLP’s state and local liability and $2 relates to SFS’s corporate tax expense. The deferred tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $1,741 and $1,885, respectively. When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 is $4,558 and $3,682, respectively. The discrete tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, was $197 and $240, respectively. For 2020 this represents additional tax expense ~~of $240 for discrete items. The~~associated with a favorable fair value adjustment to contingent purchase price consideration related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cortina Acquisition. For 2019 the discrete items are primarily attributable to adjustments to the value of deferred tax assets for Silvercrest as a result of changes in state apportionment resulting from the acquisition of Cortina. ~~There was no material discrete tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2018.~~

The current tax expense was $1,798 and $3,808 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $610 relates to Silvercrest’s corporate tax expense, $1,185 relates to SLP’s state and local liability and $3 relates to SFS’s corporate tax expense. The deferred tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $1,885 and $127, respectively. When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 is $3,682 and $3,935, respectively. The tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 includes additional tax expense of $240 for discrete items. The discrete items are primarily attributable to adjustments to the value of deferred tax assets for Silvercrest as a result of changes in state apportionment resulting from the acquisition of Cortina. There was no material discrete tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

~~The current tax expense decreased~~increased from the comparable period in ~~2018~~2019 mainly due to ~~decreased profitability and favorable timing differences related to various deferred assets recorded at SLP.~~increased profitability.

Of the total current tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, $212 and ~~2018,~~ $134, ~~and $243,~~ respectively, relates to non-controlling interests. Of the deferred tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, ($56) and ~~2018,~~ $7, ~~and ($27),~~ respectively, relates to non-controlling interests. When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 related to non-controlling interests is ~~$141~~$156 and ~~$216,~~$141, respectively.

Of the total current tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, $490 and ~~2018,~~ $450, ~~and $685,~~ respectively, relates to non-controlling interests. Of the deferred tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, $12 and ~~2018,~~ $27, ~~and $(55),~~ respectively, relates to non-controlling interests. When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 related to non-controlling interests is ~~$477~~$502 and ~~$630,~~$477, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal, state, and local tax regulators. As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2016 through ~~2019~~2020 are open under the normal three-year statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination.

The guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company does not believe that it has any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Furthermore, the Company does not have any material uncertain tax positions at September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP would have the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees and (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

On November 2, 2012, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

A total of 1,687,500 shares were originally reserved and available for issuance under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. As of September 30, ~~2019, 489,549~~2020, 345,428 shares are available for grant. The equity interests may be issued in the form of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B units of SLP. (All references to units or interests of SLP refer to Class B units of SLP and accompanying shares of Class B common stock of Silvercrest).

The purposes of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan are to (i) align the long-term financial interests of our employees, directors, consultants and advisers with those of our stockholders; (ii) attract and retain those individuals by providing compensation opportunities that are consistent with our compensation philosophy; and (iii) provide incentives to those individuals who contribute significantly to our long-term performance and growth. To accomplish these purposes, the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of units of SLP. The 2012 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance-based stock awards and other stock-based awards (collectively, stock awards) based on our Class A common stock. Awards may be granted to employees, including officers, members, limited partners or partners who are engaged in the business of one or more of our subsidiaries, as well as non-employee directors and consultants.

The Compensation Committee may impose vesting conditions and awards may be forfeited if the vesting conditions are not met. During the period that any vesting restrictions apply, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the recipient of awards that vest in the form of units of SLP will be eligible to participate in distributions of income from SLP. In addition, before the vesting conditions have been satisfied, the transferability of such units is generally prohibited and such units will not be eligible to be exchanged for cash or shares of our Class A common stock.

In August 2015, the Company granted 966,510 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.23 per share to existing Class B unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP. ~~Twenty-five~~NaN percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,791 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to existing Class B unit holders. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP. ~~Twenty-five~~NaN percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,000 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to certain members of the Board of Directors. These RSUs vested and settled in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest. One hundred percent of the RSUs granted vested and settled on the first anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 7,582 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to an employee. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest. ~~Twenty-five~~NaN percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In October 2018, the Company granted 105,398 non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder. The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions: Strike price of $13.97, Risk Free rate of 2.94% (5-year treasury rate), expiration of 5 years and volatility of 32.7%. Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience. These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP. One third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2019, the Company granted 60,742 ~~non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”)~~NQOs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder. The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions: Strike price of $14.54, Risk Free rate of 2.32% (5-year treasury rate), expiration of 5 years and volatility of 34.2%. Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience. These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP. One third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2019, the Company granted 34,388 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $14.54 per share to an existing Class B unit holder. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B shares of SLP. ~~Twenty-five~~NaN percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In March 2020, the Company granted 8,242 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $11.83 per share to a Board member. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest. All of the RSUs granted vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2020, the Company granted 86,764 NQOs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder. The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions: Strike price of $10.18, Risk Free rate of 0.64% (10-year treasury rate), expiration of 10 years and volatility of 48.0%. Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience. These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP. One-third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2020, the Company granted 49,116 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $10.11 per share to an existing Class B unit holder. These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B shares of SLP. NaN percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company recorded compensation expense related to such RSUs and NQOs of ~~$445~~$192 and ~~$832,~~$445, respectively, as part of total compensation expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period then ended. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company recorded compensation expense related to such RSUs and NQOs of ~~$2,166~~$456 and ~~$2,433,~~$2,166, respectively, as part of total compensation expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period then ended. As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there was ~~$1,051~~$1,543 and ~~$2,392,~~$945, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards. As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards is expected to be recognized over a period of ~~1.87~~1.91 and ~~1.51~~1.62 years, respectively.

A summary of the RSU grants by the Company as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 is presented below:

	Restricted Stock Units Granted					Restricted Stock Units Granted
						Units			Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2020							37,234		$	13.19 – 14.54
Granted							57,358			10.18 – 11.83
Vested							(11,443	)		13.19 – 14.54
Total granted at September 30, 2020							83,149		$	10.18 – 14.54
	Units			Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		247,316		$	13.19 – 13.23		247,316		$	13.19 – 13.23
Granted		34,388			14.54		34,388			14.54
Vested		(244,470	)		13.19 – 13.23		(244,470	)		13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at September 30, 2019		37,234		$	13.19 – 14.54		37,234		$	13.19 – 14.54

Total granted at January 1, 2018		491,786		$	13.19 – 13.23
Vested		(244,470	)		13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at September 30, 2018		247,316		$	13.19 – 13.23

A summary of the NQO grants by the Company as of September 30, 2020 and 2019 is presented below:

	Non-Qualified Options Granted				Non-Qualified Options Granted
					Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2020						166,140	$	13.19 – 14.54
Granted						86,764		10.18
Total granted at September 30, 2020						252,904	$	10.18 – 14.54
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		105,398	$	13.97		105,398	$	13.97
Granted		60,742		14.54		60,742		14.54
Total granted at September 30, 2019		166,140	$	13.97 – 14.54		166,140	$	13.97 – 14.54

SAMG LLC has a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the “Plan”) for all eligible employees who meet the minimum age and service requirements as defined in the Plan. The Plan is designed to be a qualified plan under sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. For employees who qualify under the terms of the Plan, on an annual basis Silvercrest matches dollar for dollar an employee’s contributions up to the first 4% of compensation. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, Silvercrest made matching contributions of $22 and ~~$19,~~$22, respectively, for the benefit of employees. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, Silvercrest made matching contributions of $66 and ~~$56,~~$66, respectively, for the benefit of ~~employees.~~employees

The Company obtains research and other services through “soft dollar” arrangements. The Company receives credits from broker-dealers whereby technology-based research, market quotation and/or market survey services are effectively paid for in whole or in part by “soft dollar” brokerage arrangements. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides a “safe harbor” to an investment adviser against claims that it breached its fiduciary duty under state or federal law (including ERISA) solely because the adviser caused its clients’ accounts to pay more than the lowest available commission for executing a securities trade in return for brokerage and research services. To rely on the safe harbor offered by Section 28(e), (i) the Company must make a good-faith determination that the amount of commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services being received and (ii) the brokerage and research services must provide lawful and appropriate assistance to the Company in carrying out its investment decision-making responsibilities. If the use of soft dollars is limited or prohibited in the future by regulation, the Company may have to bear the costs of such research and other services. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company utilized “soft dollar” credits of ~~$209~~ $263and ~~$193,~~$152, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company utilized “soft dollar” credits of ~~$554~~$690 and ~~$579,~~$554, respectively.

I~~tem~~Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This report contains forward-looking statements relating to present or future trends or factors that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks include, but are not limited to: specific and overall impacts of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on our financial condition and results of operations; our ability to achieve our business objectives; our ability to successfully achieve the anticipated results of strategic transactions, including the integration of the operations of acquired assets and businesses; the retention and development of clients and other business relationships; disruptions or delays in our business operations, including without limitation disruptions or delays arising from political unrest, war, labor strikes, natural disasters, public health crises such as the coronavirus pandemic, and other events and circumstances beyond our control; our ability to control costs; general economic conditions; fluctuation in operating results; changes in the securities markets; our ability to maintain compliance with the terms of our credit facility; the availability, integration and effective operation of information systems and other technology, and the potential interruption of such systems or technology; risks related to data security of privacy breaches; and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC. Our future financial performance could differ materially from the expectations of management contained herein. Additionally, many of these risks and uncertainties are currently elevated by and may or will continue to be elevated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks, but may become material in the future. We undertake no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements after the date of this report.

We are a full-service wealth management firm focused on providing financial advisory and related family office services to ultra-high net worth individuals and institutional investors. In addition to a wide range of investment capabilities, we offer a full suite of complementary and customized family office services for families seeking a comprehensive oversight of their financial affairs. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our assets under management increased by ~~8.3%~~2.5% from ~~$21.7~~$23.8 billion to ~~$23.5~~$24.4 billion. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our assets under management ~~increased~~decreased by ~~23.7%~~2.8% from ~~$19.0~~$25.1 billion to ~~$23.5~~$24.4 billion. On July 1, 2019, we acquired $1.7 billion of assets under management in connection with the acquisition of Cortina Asset Management LLC (“Cortina” and the “Cortina Acquisition”).

The business includes the management of funds of funds, and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”. As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, Silvercrest L.P. has issued Restricted Stock Units exercisable for ~~35,336~~74,907 Class B units which entitle the holders thereof to receive distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to the same extent as if the underlying Class B units were outstanding. Net profits and net losses of Silvercrest L.P. will be allocated, and distributions from Silvercrest L.P. will be made, to its current partners pro rata in accordance with their respective partnership units (and assuming the Class B units underlying all restricted stock units are outstanding).

The historical results of operations discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include those of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. As the general partner of Silvercrest L.P., we control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. The interests of the limited partners’ collective ~~36%~~33.7% partnership interest in Silvercrest L.P. as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 are reflected in non-controlling interests in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The emergence of the coronavirus (COVID-19) around the world, and particularly in the United States, presents significant risks to us, not all of which we are able to fully evaluate or foresee at the current time. While the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially affect our financial results and business operations in the first fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2020, economic and health conditions in the United States and across most of the globe changed rapidly since the end of the first quarter and into the second fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2020. Demand for our services continues despite the current capital markets and overall economic environment. Such current demand may not continue and/or demand may decrease from historical levels depending on the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the length of time it takes for normal economic and operating conditions to resume, additional governmental actions that may be taken and/or extensions of time for restrictions that have been imposed to date, and numerous other uncertainties.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected our operations in the second quarter ended June 30, 2020, in the third quarter ended September 30, 2020, and may continue to do so indefinitely thereafter. All of these factors may have far reaching impacts on our business, operations, and financial results and conditions, directly and indirectly, including without limitation impacts on the health of our management and employees, client behavior, and on the overall economy. The scope and nature of these impacts, most of which are beyond our control, continue to evolve, and the outcomes of these impacts are uncertain.

Our revenue is highly correlated to securities markets. As a result, we expect that our assets under management and revenue levels will be negatively impacted, on an incremental basis, by the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on securities markets. The decrease in assets under management for the three months ended March 31, 2020 had an impact on our revenue for the second quarter ended June 30, 2020 because most of our revenue is billed in advance based on the value of assets under management on the last day of the preceding calendar quarter. Assets under management continue to be lower than at December 31, 2019, which caused a negative impact on our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. We continue to fully operate with our management and employees working remotely and we have had business continuity plans in place which we were able to seamlessly activate upon actions taken by various governmental authorities suggesting that businesses recommend that their employees work from home as a result of the pandemic.

Due to the above circumstances and as described generally in this Form 10-Q, the Company’s results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2020, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2020 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year. Management cannot predict the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s earnings and operations nor to economic conditions generally. The ultimate extent of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company is highly uncertain and will depend on future developments, and such effects could exist for an extended period of time even after the pandemic might end.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands except as indicated)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Revenue	$	27,845		$	24,932		$	74,314		$	73,840		$	27,182		$	27,845		$	79,568		$	74,314
Income before other income (expense), net	$	6,301		$	5,166		$	14,730		$	15,913		$	4,949		$	6,301		$	18,920		$	14,730
Net income	$	4,823		$	3,893		$	11,219		$	12,136		$	3,480		$	4,823		$	13,952		$	11,219
Net income margin		17.3	%		15.6	%		15.1	%		16.4	%		12.8	%		17.3	%		17.5	%		15.1	%
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	2,653		$	2,162		$	6,226		$	6,730		$	2,059		$	2,653		$	8,081		$	6,226
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	$	8,942		$	7,044		$	21,261		$	21,061		$	8,119		$	8,942		$	22,999		$	21,261
Adjusted EBITDA margin (2)		32.1	%		28.3	%		28.6	%		28.5	%		29.9	%		32.1	%		28.9	%		28.6	%
Assets under management at period end (billions)	$	23.5		$	21.7		$	23.5		$	21.7		$	24.4		$	23.5		$	24.4		$	23.5
Average assets under management (billions) (3)	$	22.6		$	21.8		$	21.3		$	21.5		$	24.1		$	22.6		$	24.8		$	21.3

We generate revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Our management and advisory fees are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Our performance fees and allocations relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which we have a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which we have no partnership interest. Our management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are

resolved. In certain arrangements, we are only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for our separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for our private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by us upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a specified percentage of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with us, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for our private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of our investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from us to our clients. The tables below set forth the amount of assets under management, the percentage of management and advisory fees revenues, the amount of revenue recognized, and the average assets under management for discretionary managed accounts and for private funds for each period presented.

	As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,						As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,						As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,						As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in billions)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
AUM concentrated in Discretionary Managed Accounts	$	16.8		$	15.7		$	16.8		$	15.7		$	17.5		$	16.8		$	17.5		$	16.8
Average AUM For Discretionary Managed Accounts	$	16.1		$	15.5		$	15.2		$	15.6		$	17.2		$	16.1		$	17.9		$	15.2
Discretionary Managed Accounts Revenue (in millions)	$	25.5		$	21.9		$	67.4		$	64.9		$	25.0		$	25.5		$	73.1		$	67.4
Percentage of management and advisory fees revenue		95	%		92	%		95	%		92	%		95	%		95	%		95	%		95	%

	As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,						As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,						As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,						As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in billions)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
AUM concentrated in Private Funds	$	0.7		$	0.9		$	0.7		$	0.9		$	0.4		$	0.7		$	0.4		$	0.7
Average AUM For Private Funds	$	0.7		$	0.9		$	0.7		$	0.7		$	0.4		$	0.7		$	0.5		$	0.7
Private Funds Revenue (in millions)	$	1.3		$	2.0		$	3.9		$	5.8		$	1.2		$	1.3		$	3.5		$	3.9
Percentage of management and advisory fees revenue		5	%		8	%		5	%		8	%		5	%		5	%		5	%		5	%

Our management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of our assets under management. Our assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into our various investment strategies and the investment performance of our clients’ accounts. In order to increase our assets under management and expand our business, we must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of our target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. Our ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

The majority of management and advisory fees that we earn on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of our management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. Our basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance, (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65% ~~and~~, (iv) for Cortina’s equity portfolios, 1% on the first $25 million, 0.90% on the next $50 million and 0.80% on the balance and (v) for outsourced chief investment officer portfolios, 0.40% on the first $50 million, 0.32% on the next $50 million and 0.24% on the balance. Our fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of our client relationships pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

Management fees earned on investment funds that we advise are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For our private funds, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which we perform risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

Average annual management fee is calculated by dividing our actual annualized revenue earned over a period by our average assets under management during the same period (which is calculated by averaging quarter-end assets under management for the applicable period). Our average annual management fee was ~~0.49%~~0.45% and ~~0.46%~~0.49% for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018, respectively,~~respectively. Our average annual management fee was 0.43% and 0.47% ~~and 0.46%~~ for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Changes in our total average management fee rates are typically the result of changes in the mix of our assets under management and the concentration in our equities strategies whose fee rates are higher than those of other investment strategies. Management and advisory fees are also adjusted for any cash flows into or out of a portfolio, where the cash flow represents greater than 10% of the previous quarter-end market value of the portfolio. These cash flow-related adjustments were insignificant for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Silvercrest L.P. has authority to take fees directly from external custodian accounts of its separately managed accounts.

Our management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

Our family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to our clients. Our dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom we perform these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized.

Our expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits expenses, as well as general and administrative expense including rent, professional services fees, data-related costs and sub-advisory fees. These expenses may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including the following:

Our largest expense is compensation and benefits, which includes the salaries, bonuses, equity-based compensation and related benefits and payroll costs attributable to our principals and employees. Our compensation methodology is intended to meet the following objectives: (i) support our overall business strategy; (ii) attract, retain and motivate top-tier professionals within the investment management industry; and (iii) align our employees’ interests with those of our equity owners. We have experienced, and

expect to continue to experience, a general rise in compensation and benefits expense commensurate with growth in headcount and with the need to maintain competitive compensation levels.

The components of our compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,				For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Cash compensation and benefits (1)	$	14,655	$	14,116	$	40,315	$	41,273	$	14,950	$	14,655	$	43,761	$	40,315
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense		445		833		2,166		2,433		192		445		456		2,166
Total compensation expense	$	15,100	$	14,949	$	42,481	$	43,706	$	15,142	$	15,100	$	44,217	$	42,481

During ~~2019, 2016~~2020 and ~~2015,~~2019, Silvercrest L.P. granted restricted stock units (“RSU”) to existing Class B unit holders. During ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, Silvercrest L.P. granted non-qualified options (“NQO”) to an existing Class B unit holder. Information regarding restricted stock units and stock options can be found in Note 16. “Equity Based Compensation” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.

General and administrative expenses include occupancy-related costs, professional and outside services fees, office expenses, depreciation and amortization, sub-advisory fees and the costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems. Our costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems and professional services expenses generally increase or decrease in relative proportion to the number of employees retained by us and the overall size and scale of our business operations. Sub-advisory fees will fluctuate based on the level of management fees from funds that utilize sub-advisors.

Other income is derived primarily from investment income arising from our investments in various private investment funds that were established as part of our investment strategies. We expect the investment components of other income, in the aggregate, to fluctuate based on market conditions and the success of our investment strategies. Performance fees and allocations earned from those investment funds in which we have a partnership interest have been earned over the past few years as a result of the achievement of various high-water marks depending on the investment fund. These performance fees and allocations are recorded based on the equity method of accounting. The majority of our performance fees and allocations over the past few years have been earned from our fixed income-related funds.

We are the general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. In light of the limited partners’ interest in Silvercrest L.P., we reflect their partnership interests as non-controlling interests in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We are subject to taxes applicable to C-corporations. Our effective tax rate, and the absolute dollar amount of our tax expense will be offset by the benefits of the tax receivable agreement entered into with our Class B stockholders.

On April 12, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina (the ~~“Principals”~~“Principals of Cortina”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, we agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44.9 million, 80% of which was agreed to be paid in cash at closing by us, and 20% of which was agreed to be paid by us in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals of Cortina at closing of Class B Units in Silvercrest L.P., in each case subject to certain

adjustments as described in the Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26.2 million to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals of Cortina receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of Silvercrest L.P. in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

On July 1, 2019, the acquisition was completed pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. At closing, the Company paid to Cortina an aggregate principal amount of $33.6 million in cash, and Silvercrest L.P. paid an additional $9.0 million in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals of Cortina of 662,713 Class B Units in Silvercrest L.P. Of the $33.6 million paid in cash, $35.1 million represented consideration, partially offset by net closing credits due to the Company for reimbursable expenses from Cortina.

In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26.2 million to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals of Cortina receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of Silvercrest L.P. in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement is only a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Purchase Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Silvercrest on April 15, 2019.

On December 13, 2018, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Neosho Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Silvercrest L.P. (“SLP”), Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) and Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho, to acquire certain assets of Neosho. The transaction contemplated by the Neosho Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

On December 15, 2015, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Cappiccille Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC and Cappiccille & Company, LLC (“Cappiccille”), and Michael Cappiccille, to acquire certain assets of Cappiccille. The transaction contemplated by the Cappiccille Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 11, 2016 and is referred to herein as the “Cappiccille Acquisition”.

Information regarding the Cortina ~~Neosho~~ and ~~Cappiccille~~Neosho Acquisitions can be found in Note 3. “Acquisitions” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.

Our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are set forth below:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,										For the Three Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)			2020		2019		2020 vs. 2019 ($)			2020 vs. 2019 (%)
Management and advisory fees	$	26,842	$	23,841	$	3,001			12.6	%	$	26,148	$	26,842	$	(694	)		(2.6	)%
Family office services		1,003		1,091		(88	)		(8.1	)%		1,034		1,003		31			3.1	%
Total revenue	$	27,845	$	24,932	$	2,913			11.7	%	$	27,182	$	27,845	$	(663	)		(2.4	)%

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,										For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)			2020		2019		2020 vs. 2019 ($)		2020 vs. 2019 (%)
Management and advisory fees	$	71,310	$	70,683	$	627			0.9	%	$	76,554	$	71,310	$	5,244		7.4	%
Family office services		3,004		3,157		(153	)		(4.8	)%		3,014		3,004		10		0.3	%
Total revenue	$	74,314	$	73,840	$	474			0.6	%	$	79,568	$	74,314	$	5,254		7.1	%

The growth in our assets under management during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 is described below:

	Assets Under Management									Assets Under Management
				Non-									Non-
(in billions)	Discretionary			Discretionary			Total			Discretionary			Discretionary			Total
As of June 30, 2018	$	16.2		$	5.6		$	21.8
Gross client inflows		2.0			─			2.0
Gross client outflows		(2.1	)		(0.9	)		(3.0	)
Market appreciation		0.5			0.4			0.9
As of September 30, 2018	$	16.6		$	5.1		$	21.7	(1)

As of June 30, 2019	$	16.0		$	5.7		$	21.7		$	16.0		$	5.7		$	21.7
Gross client inflows		3.8			0.3			4.1			3.8			0.3			4.1
Gross client outflows		(2.3	)		(0.3	)		(2.6	)		(2.3	)		(0.3	)		(2.6	)
Market appreciation		─			0.3			0.3			─			0.3			0.3
As of September 30, 2019	$	17.5		$	6.0		$	23.5	(1)	$	17.5		$	6.0		$	23.5	(1)

As of January 1, 2018	$	16.0		$	5.3		$	21.3
As of June 30, 2020										$	17.3		$	6.5		$	23.8
Gross client inflows		6.2			0.3			6.5			0.8			0.1			0.9
Gross client outflows		(6.2	)		(1.1	)		(7.3	)		(0.9	)		(0.1	)		(1.0	)
Market appreciation		0.6			0.6			1.2			0.7			─			0.7
As of September 30, 2018	$	16.6		$	5.1		$	21.7	(1)
As of September 30, 2020										$	17.9		$	6.5		$	24.4	(1)

As of January 1, 2019	$	14.2		$	4.8		$	19.0		$	14.2		$	4.8		$	19.0
Gross client inflows		8.0			0.5			8.5			8.0			0.5			8.5
Gross client outflows		(6.5	)		(0.4	)		(6.9	)		(6.5	)		(0.4	)		(6.9	)
Market appreciation		1.8			1.1			2.9			1.8			1.1			2.9
As of September 30, 2019	$	17.5		$	6.0		$	23.5	(1)
As of September 30, 2019										$	17.5		$	6.0		$	23.5	(1)

As of January 1, 2020										$	18.8		$	6.3		$	25.1
Gross client inflows											2.6			0.3			2.9
Gross client outflows											(2.4	)		(0.2	)		(2.6	)
Market (depreciation)/appreciation											(1.1	)		0.1			(1.0	)
As of September 30, 2020										$	17.9		$	6.5		$	24.4	(1)

The following chart summarizes the performance ^{1, 2} of each of our principal equity strategies relative to their appropriate benchmarks since inception:

	ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE						ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE
	INCEPTION	1-YEAR	3-YEAR	5-YEAR	7-YEAR	INCEPTION	INCEPTION	1-YEAR	3-YEAR	5-YEAR	7-YEAR	INCEPTION
Large Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	4.6	13.5	11.6	13.8	9.1	4/1/02	4.3	8.4	13.0	11.0	8.8
Russell 1000 Value Index		4.0	9.4	7.8	11.3	7.3		- 5.0	2.6	7.7	7.4	6.6

Small Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	-4.2	7.6	9.3	11.6	10.4	4/1/02	-11.5	- 3.1	5.5	5.4	9.1
Russell 2000 Value Index		-8.2	6.5	7.2	9.4	7.6		-14.9	- 5.1	4.1	3.3	6.3

Smid Cap Value Composite	10/1/05	-2.8	10.0	10.8	12.6	9.8	10/1/05	-10.6	- 1.4	7.4	7.2	8.3
Russell 2500 Value Index		-4.4	6.9	7.0	10.1	7.2		-12.6	- 2.7	4.7	4.3	5.8

Multi Cap Value Composite	7/1/02	0.9	11.1	10.3	12.8	9.6	7/1/02	0.8	4.7	10.5	9.5	9.1
Russell 3000 Value Index		3.1	9.2	7.8	11.2	8.0		- 5.7	2.1	7.4	7.1	7.2

Equity Income Composite	12/1/03	5.1	12.5	11.8	14.0	11.8	12/1/03	- 8.0	3.4	10.3	9.2	10.6
Russell 3000 Value Index		3.1	9.2	7.8	11.2	8.1		- 5.7	2.1	7.4	7.1	7.3

Focused Value Composite	9/1/04	-2.7	9.0	9.7	12.9	10.5	9/1/04	0.2	3.6	10.0	8.9	9.8
Russell 3000 Value Index		3.1	9.2	7.8	11.2	7.9		- 5.7	2.1	7.4	7.1	7.0

Small Cap Opportunity Composite	7/1/04	-7.6	11.6	11.5	11.7	10.9	7/1/04	3.6	6.4	10.9	8.6	10.4
Russell 2000 Index		-8.9	8.2	8.2	10.4	7.8		0.4	1.8	8.0	6.4	7.4

Small Cap Growth Composite	7/1/04	-12.9	12.4	10.8	10.6	9.8	7/1/04	28.8	14.5	17.0	10.3	10.9
Russell 2000 Growth Index		-9.6	9.8	9.1	11.4	8.5		15.7	8.2	11.4	9.2	8.9

Smid Cap Growth Composite	7/1/04	-3.7	15.1	10.8	10.7	9.8	1/1/06	47.0	23.0	20.9	13.8	12.0
Russell 2500 Growth Index		-4.1	12.3	10.2	12.8	9.4		23.4	13.4	14.2	11.7	10.3

The Russell 1000 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 1000 largest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 1000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.

The Russell 2000 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The Russell 2000 Growth Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth.

The Russell 2500 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2500 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2500 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values. The Russell 2500 Growth Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2500 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth.

The Russell 3000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures those Russell 3000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth.

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

Our total revenue ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$2.9~~$0.6 million, or ~~11.7%~~2.4%, to $27.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020, from $27.8 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2019. This decrease was driven by the continued impact of COVID-19 on the financial markets during the quarter ended March 31, 2020 which caused a reduction in assets under management, as well as net client outflows during the quarter ended September 30, 2020. This was partially offset by market appreciation during the current quarter.

Total assets under management increased by $0.9 billion, or 3.8%, to $24.4 billion at September 30, 2020 from ~~$24.9 million for~~$23.5 billion at September 30, 2019. Compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2018. This~~2019, there was an increase ~~was driven~~in market appreciation of $0.4 billion and a decrease of $1.5 billion in client outflows, partially offset by ~~net~~a decrease of $3.1 billion in client inflows. Client inflows ~~in discretionary assets under management, including~~during the three months ended September 30, 2019 included $1.7 billion in assets under management acquired on July 1, 2019 in connection with the Cortina ~~Acquisition, partially offset by net client outflows during the three months ended September 30, 2019.~~

Total assets under management increased by $1.8 billion, or 8.3%, to $23.5 billion at September 30, 2019 from $21.7 billion at September 30, 2018. Compared to the three months ended September 30, 2018, there was an increase of $2.0 billion in client inflows and a decrease of $0.5 billion in client outflows, partially offset by a decrease in market appreciation of $0.5 billion.Acquisition. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, from June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, there was an increase of ~~$1.5~~$0.6 billion in discretionary assets under management while non-discretionary assets under management ~~increased~~remained flat. The increase in assets under management as of September 30, 2020 as compared to June 30, 2020 were primarily due to market appreciation during the quarter ended September 30, 2020, partially offset by ~~$0.3 billion.~~net client withdrawals during the current quarter. Sub-advised fund management revenue remained flat at $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Proprietary fund management revenue decreased by $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of market fluctuations and client redemptions. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, equity assets experienced an increase of ~~11.7%~~4.5% during the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and fixed income assets increased by ~~1.2%~~2.9% during the same period. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, most of the increase in equity assets came from our ~~REIT, equity income~~core international, smid growth and ~~large~~small cap ~~value~~growth strategies with composite returns of ~~10.2%~~12.2%, ~~1.5%~~12.0% and ~~1.4%~~9.8%, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the composition of our assets under management was ~~74%~~73% in discretionary assets, which includes both separately managed accounts and proprietary and sub-advised funds, and ~~26%~~27% in non-discretionary assets which represent assets on which we provide portfolio reporting but do not have investment discretion.

The following table represents a further breakdown of our assets under management as of the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Total AUM as of June 30,	$	21.7		$	21.8		$	23.8		$	21.7
Discretionary AUM:
Total Discretionary AUM as of June 30,		16.0			16.2			17.3			16.0
New client accounts/assets (1)		1.7			─			0.1			1.7
Closed accounts (2)		─			(0.1	)		─			─
Net cash inflow/(outflow) (3)		(0.3	)		─			(0.2	)		(0.3	)
Non-discretionary to Discretionary AUM (4)		─			─			─			─
Market appreciation		0.1			0.5			0.7			0.1
Change to Discretionary AUM		1.5			0.4			0.6			1.5
Total Discretionary AUM at September 30,		17.5			16.6			17.9			17.5
Change to Non-Discretionary AUM (5)		0.3			(0.5	)		─			0.3
Total AUM as of September 30,	$	23.5		$	21.7		$	24.4		$	23.5

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

Our total revenue increased by ~~$0.5~~$5.3 million, or ~~0.6%~~7.1%, to $79.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, from $74.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019, from $73.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~2019. This increase was driven by net client inflows in discretionary assets under management, including $1.7 billion in assets under management acquired on July 1, 2019 in connection with the Cortina Acquisition, ~~and market appreciation,~~ partially offset by net client ~~outflows.~~ outflows and market depreciation during the quarter ended March 31, 2020. Cortina revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $8.4 million. Revenue for the first three quarters of 2020 is primarily based on market values as of the end of the respective prior quarter, and as such was partially affected by declines in the financial markets caused by COVID-19 during the quarter ended March 31,2020.

Total assets under management increased by ~~$1.8~~$0.9 billion, or ~~8.3%~~3.8%, to $24.4 billion at September 30, 2020 from $23.5 billion at September 30, ~~2019 from $21.7 billion at September 30, 2018.~~2019. Compared to the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there was ~~an increase of $2.0 billion in client inflows and~~ a decrease ~~of $0.4 billion in client outflows and an increase~~ in market appreciation of $3.9 billion and a decrease in client inflows of $5.6 billion, partially offset by a decrease in client outflows of $4.3 billion. Client inflows during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 included $1.7 ~~billion.~~billion in assets under management acquired on July 1, 2019 in connection with the Cortina Acquisition. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, from December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there was ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$3.3~~$0.9 billion in discretionary assets under management and an increase of ~~$1.2~~$0.2 billion in non-discretionary assets under management. The decrease in assets under management during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, as compared to December 31, 2019, was primarily due to market depreciation due to the effects of COVID-19 on financial markets during the quarter ended March 31, 2020, partially offset by net client inflows during the nine month period. Sub-advised fund management revenue ~~decreased by $0.2~~remained flat at $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same period in the prior ~~year as a result of market fluctuations and client redemptions.~~year. Proprietary fund management revenue decreased by ~~$0.8~~$0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same period in the prior year, as a result of market depreciation. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, equity assets experienced ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~29.3%~~7.3% during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and fixed income assets increased by ~~8.9%~~1.8% during the same period. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, most of the ~~increase~~decrease in equity assets came from our ~~REIT, core international~~master limited partnership, emerging markets ADR and ~~large cap value~~REIT strategies with composite returns of ~~29.2%~~(40.0)%, ~~24.2%~~(24.6)% and ~~22.5%~~(20.2)%, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the composition of our assets under management was ~~74%~~73% in discretionary assets, which includes both separately managed accounts and proprietary and sub-advised funds, and ~~26%~~27% in non-discretionary assets which represent assets on which we provide portfolio reporting but do not have investment discretion.

The following table represents a further breakdown of our assets under management as of the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Total AUM as of January 1,	$	19.0		$	21.3		$	25.1		$	19.0
Discretionary AUM:
Total Discretionary AUM as of January 1,		14.2			16.0			18.8			14.2
New client accounts/assets (1)		2.2			0.3			0.5			2.2
Closed accounts (2)		(0.4	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)		(0.4	)
Net cash inflow/(outflow) (3)		(0.3	)		(0.2	)		(0.1	)		(0.3	)
Non-discretionary to Discretionary AUM (4)		─			─
Market appreciation		1.8			0.6
Market (depreciation) appreciation								(1.1	)		1.8
Change to Discretionary AUM		3.3			0.6			(0.9	)		3.3
Total Discretionary AUM at September 30,		17.5			16.6			17.9			17.5
Change to Non-Discretionary AUM (5)		1.2			(0.2	)		0.2			1.2
Total AUM as of September 30,	$	23.5		$	21.7		$	24.4		$	23.5

Our expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are set forth below:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,									For the Three Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019 vs. 2018 ($)		2019 vs. 2018 (%)			2020		2019		2020 vs. 2019 ($)		2020 vs. 2019 (%)
Compensation and benefits (1)	$	15,100	$	14,949	$	151		1.0	%	$	15,142	$	15,100	$	42		0.3	%
General, administrative and other		6,444		4,817		1,627		33.8	%		7,091		6,444		647		10.0	%
Total expenses	$	21,544	$	19,766	$	1,778		9.0	%	$	22,233	$	21,544	$	689		3.2	%

Our expenses are driven primarily by our compensation costs. The table included in “—Expenses—Compensation and Benefits Expense” describes the components of our compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Other expenses, such as rent, professional service fees, data-related costs, and sub-advisory fees incurred are included in our general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

Total expenses increased by ~~$1.8~~$0.7 million, or ~~9.0%~~3.2%, to $22.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 from $21.5 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019 from $19.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018.~~2019. This increase was attributable to ~~an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $0.2 million and~~ an increase in general, administrative and other expenses of ~~$1.6~~$0.6 million and an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $0.1 million.

Compensation and benefits expense increased by ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million, or ~~1.0%~~0.3%, to $15.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 from $15.1 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019 from $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018.~~2019. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits ~~expense~~ of ~~$0.8~~$0.3 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff, ~~including the addition of Cortina staff,~~ partially offset by ~~a decrease in the accrual for bonuses of $0.3 million and~~ a decrease in equity based compensation expense of ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million due to a decrease in the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding.

General and administrative expenses increased by ~~$1.6~~$0.7 million, or ~~33.8%~~10.0%, to $7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 from $6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019. This was primarily attributable to an increase in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition of $1.7 million and an increase in portfolio and systems expenses of $0.2 million partially offset by a decrease in professional fees of $0.9 million, a decrease in travel and entertainment expenses of $0.2 million as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, a decrease in office expense of $0.1 million as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and a decrease in storage and moving expenses of $0.1 million.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 ~~from $4.8~~

Total expenses increased by $1.0 million, or 1.8%, to $60.6 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2020 from $59.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. This increase was attributable to an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $1.7 million partially offset by a decrease in general, administrative and other expenses of $0.7 million.

Compensation and benefits expense increased by $1.7 million, or 4.1%, to $44.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 from $42.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits expense of $2.1 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff, including the addition of Cortina staff and an increase in the accrual for bonuses of $1.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in equity based compensation expense of $1.7 million due to a decrease in the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.7 million, or 3.9%, to $16.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 from $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition of $0.5 million, a decrease in travel and entertainment expenses of $0.5 million as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, a decrease in professional fees of $1.0 million, ~~due to an increase~~a decrease in ~~acquisition-related legal fees resulting from~~office expense of $0.1 million as a result of the ~~Cortina Acquisition,~~coronavirus pandemic, a decrease in printing costs of $0.1 million and a decrease in storage and moving expenses of $0.3 million partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of ~~$0.4~~$0.8 million related mainly to the amortization of intangible assets related to the Cortina Acquisition and to the renovation of our office space in New York City, an increase in occupancy and related expenses of ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million ~~and an increase in insurance~~related to the increased costs of ~~$0.1 million.~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018~~

Total expenses increased by $1.7 million, or 2.9%, to $59.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from $57.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was attributable to an increase in general, administrative and other expenses of $2.9 million partially offset by a decrease in compensation and benefits expense of $1.3 million.

Compensation and benefits expense decreased by $1.3 million, or 2.8%, to $42.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from $43.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the accrual for bonuses of $2.7 million and a decrease in equity based compensation expense of $0.3 millioncleaning due to ~~a decrease in~~ the number of unvested restricted stock units and unvested non-qualified stock options outstanding, partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits expense of $1.7 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff, including the addition of Cortina staff.

General and administrative expenses increased by $2.9 million, or 20.3%, to $17.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from $14.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase was primarily attributable tocoronavirus pandemic, an increase in portfolio and systems expenses of ~~$0.4 million due to an increase in soft dollar-related research costs, an increase in occupancy and related expenses of $0.6~~$0.5 million, an increase in ~~professional fees~~the fair value of ~~$1.2 million due to an increase in acquisition-related legal fees, an increase in moving and storage costs of $0.3 million~~contingent consideration related to the ~~renovation~~Jamison Acquisition of our office space in New York City, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $0.4 million related mainly to the amortization of intangible assets related to the Cortina Acquisition and to the renovation of our office space in New York City, an increase in travel expenses of $0.2$0.1 million and an increase in ~~office expense~~the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cappiccille Acquisition of $0.1 ~~million, partially offset by a decrease in recruiting costs of $0.3~~ million.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,												For the Three Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)			2020			2019			2020 vs. 2019 ($)			2020 vs. 2019 (%)
Other income (expense), net													$	8		$	242		$	(234	)		(96.7	)%
Interest income		11			70			(59	)		(84.3	)%		2			11			(9	)		(81.8	)%
Interest expense		(239	)		(7	)		(232	)		NM			(120	)		(239	)		119			49.8	%
Equity income from investments		9			─			9			100.0	%		—			9			(9	)		(100.0	)%
Total other income (expense), net	$	23		$	40		$	(17	)		(42.5	)%	$	(110	)	$	23		$	(133	)		(578.3	)%

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,												For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)			2020			2019			2020 vs. 2019 ($)			2020 vs. 2019 (%)
Other income (expense), net	$	257		$	(5	)	$	262			NM		$	23		$	257		$	(234	)		(91.1	)%
Interest income		160			199			(39	)		(19.6	)%		12			160			(148	)		(92.5	)%
Interest expense		(255	)		(36	)		(219	)		NM			(445	)		(255	)		(190	)		(74.5	)%
Equity income from investments		9			─			9			100.0	%		—			9			(9	)		(100.0	)%
Total other income (expense), net	$	171		$	158		$	13			8.2	%	$	(410	)	$	171		$	(581	)		(339.8	)%

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

Total other income (expense) net decreased by ~~$17~~$133 thousand to other expense of $110 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2020 from other income of $23 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2019 ~~from other income of $40 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2018~~ due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in interest expense as a result of the level of borrowings under our credit facility and a decrease in interest income due to lower balances on notes receivable as a result of scheduled ~~repayments offset by an adjustment to the fair value of our tax receivable agreement of $234 thousand during the quarter ended September 30, 2019.~~repayments.

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

Total other income (expense) net ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$13~~$581 thousand to other expense of $410 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 from other income of $171 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 ~~from other income of $158 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily~~ due to ~~an adjustment to the fair value of our tax receivable agreement of $234 thousand offset by~~ an increase in interest expense as a result of the level of borrowings under our credit facility and a decrease in interest income due to lower balances on notes receivable as a result of scheduled repayments.

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

The provision for income taxes was ~~$1.5~~$1.4 million and ~~$1.3~~$1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The change was primarily the result of the tax effect of the increase in the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition, partially offset by increased profitability ~~and timing differences related~~during the current period as compared to ~~various deferred assets.~~the prior year. Our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was 28.1% and ~~2018 was~~ 23.7% ~~and 25.2%~~, respectively.

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

The provision for income taxes was ~~$3.6~~$4.6 million and ~~$3.9~~$3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The change was primarily the result of ~~decreased~~by increased profitability ~~and favorable timing differences related~~during the current period as compared to ~~various deferred assets.~~the prior year. Our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was 24.6% and ~~2018 was~~ 24.7% ~~and 24.5%~~, respectively.

To provide investors with additional insight, promote transparency and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a basis consistent with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, with Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Earnings Per Share which are non-GAAP financial measures of earnings.

These adjustments, and the non-GAAP financial measures that are derived from them, provide supplemental information to analyze our operations between periods and over time. Investors should consider our non-GAAP financial measure in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The following tables contain reconciliations of net income to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share (amounts in thousands except per share amounts).

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
Net income	$	4,823		$	3,893		$	11,219		$	12,136		$	3,480		$	4,823		$	13,952		$	11,219
GAAP Provision for income taxes		1,501			1,313			3,682			3,935			1,359			1,501			4,558			3,682
Delaware Franchise Tax		50			25			150			150			50			50			150			150
Interest expense		239			7			255			36			120			239			445			255
Interest income		(11	)		(70	)		(160	)		(199	)		(2	)		(11	)		(12	)		(160	)
Depreciation and amortization		973			599			2,216			1,832			968			973			2,995			2,216
Equity-based compensation		445			833			2,166			2,433			193			445			456			2,166
Other adjustments (A)		922			444			1,733			738			1,951			922			455			1,733
Adjusted EBITDA	$	8,942		$	7,044		$	21,261		$	21,061		$	8,119		$	8,942		$	22,999		$	21,261
Adjusted EBITDA Margin		32.1	%		28.3	%		28.6	%		28.5	%		29.9	%		32.1	%		28.9	%		28.6	%

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
Net income	$	4,823		$	3,893		$	11,219		$	12,136		$	3,480		$	4,823		$	13,952		$	11,219
GAAP Provision for income taxes		1,501			1,313			3,682			3,935			1,359			1,501			4,558			3,682
Delaware Franchise Tax		50			25			150			150			50			50			150			150
Other adjustments (A)		922			444			1,733			738			1,951			922			455			1,733
Adjusted earnings before provision for income taxes		7,296			5,675			16,784			16,959			6,840			7,296			19,115			16,784
Adjusted provision for income taxes:
Adjusted provision for income taxes (26% assumed tax rate)		(1,897	)		(1,476	)		(4,364	)		(4,409	)		(1,778	)		(1,897	)		(4,970	)		(4,364	)

Adjusted net income	$	5,399		$	4,199		$	12,420		$	12,550		$	5,062		$	5,399		$	14,145		$	12,420

GAAP net income per share (B):
Basic and diluted	$	0.30		$	0.26		$	0.72		$	0.81		$	0.22		$	0.30		$	0.85		$	0.72

Adjusted earnings per share/unit (B):
Basic	$	0.38		$	0.31		$	0.86		$	0.93		$	0.35		$	0.38		$	0.98		$	0.86
Diluted	$	0.38		$	0.31		$	0.86		$	0.92		$	0.35		$	0.38		$	0.97		$	0.86

Shares/units outstanding:
Basic Class A shares outstanding		9,180			8,346			9,180			8,346			9,545			9,180			9,545			9,180
Basic Class B shares/units outstanding		5,181			5,106			5,181			5,106			4,828			5,181			4,828			5,181
Total basic shares/units outstanding		14,361			13,452			14,361			13,452			14,373			14,361			14,373			14,361

Diluted Class A shares outstanding (C)		9,182			8,350			9,182			8,350			9,553			9,182			9,553			9,182
Diluted Class B shares/units outstanding (D)		5,216			5,350			5,216			5,350			4,989			5,216			4,989			5,216
Total diluted shares/units outstanding		14,398			13,700			14,398			13,700			14,542			14,398			14,542			14,398

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019			2018		2019			2018	2020		2019			2020			2019
Non-acquisition expansion costs (a)	$	—		$	90	$	97	$	247	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	97
Acquisition costs (b)		954			—		1,324		—		38		954			318		1,324
Severance		—			—		13		—		—		—			—		13
Other (c)		(32	)		354		299		491		1,913		(32	)		137		299
Total other adjustments	$	922		$	444	$	1,733	$	738	$	1,951	$	922		$	455	$	1,733

Historically, the working capital needs of our business have primarily been met through cash generated by our operations. We expect that our cash and liquidity requirements in the next twelve months will be met primarily through cash generated by our operations. The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on our business and cash flows are evolving rapidly and cannot be predicted at this time. Consequently, we will continue to evaluate our liquidity and financial position on an ongoing basis.

On June 24, 2013, the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a $15.0 million credit facility with City National Bank. The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. are the borrowers under such facility and Silvercrest L.P. guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by certain assets of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. The credit facility consists of a $7.5 million delayed draw term loan that matures on June 24, 2025 and a $7.5 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on June 21, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the credit facility was amended to increase the term loan by $18.0 million to $25.5 million, extend the draw date on the term loan facility to July 1, 2024, extend the maturity date of the term loan to July 1, 2026 and increase the revolving credit facility by $2.5 million to $10.0 million. On June ~~20, 2019,~~19, 2020, the revolving credit facility was ~~extended~~further amended to extend the maturity date to June 19, ~~2020.~~2021. The loan bears interest at either (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.25 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 2.75 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option. As of September 30, 2019, there were no borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility. On July 1, 2019, the term loan was amended to increase the facility by $18.0 million to $25.5 million, extend the draw date to July 1, 2024 and to extend the maturity date to July 1, 2026. The borrowers are able to draw up to the full amount of the term loan through July 1, 2024. Borrowings under the term loan on or prior to June 30, 2021 are payable in 20 equal quarterly installments. Borrowings under the term loan after June 30, 2021 will be payable in equal quarterly installments through the maturity date. The credit facility contains restrictions on, among other things, (i) incurrence of additional debt, (ii) creating liens on certain assets, (iii) making certain investments, (iv) consolidating, merging or otherwise disposing of substantially all of our assets, (v) the sale of certain assets, and (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates. In addition, the credit facility contains certain financial covenants including a test on discretionary assets under management, maximum debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change in control which includes a person or group of persons acting together acquiring more than 30% of the total voting securities of Silvercrest. Any undrawn amounts under this facility would be available to fund future acquisitions or for working capital purposes, if needed. As of September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had ~~$17.1~~$13.5 million outstanding under the term loan. As of September 30, 2020, there were no borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility. We were in compliance with the covenants under the credit facility as of September 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

Our ongoing sources of cash will primarily consist of management fees and family office services fees, which are principally collected quarterly. We will primarily use cash flow from operations to pay compensation and related expenses, general and administrative expenses, income taxes, debt service, capital expenditures, distributions to Class B unit holders and dividends on shares of our Class A common stock.

Seasonality typically affects cash flow since the first quarter of each year includes, as a source of cash, payment of the prior year’s annual performance fees and allocations, if any, from our various funds and external investment strategies and, as a use of cash, the prior fiscal year’s incentive compensation. We believe that we have sufficient cash from our operations to fund our operations and commitments for the next twelve months.

The following table sets forth certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

	As of				As of
(in thousands)	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		September 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,841	$	69,283	$	48,171	$	52,832
Accounts receivable	$	8,867	$	8,022	$	8,642	$	8,958
Due from Silvercrest Funds	$	1,549	$	1,233	$	1,806	$	1,697

We anticipate that distributions to the limited partners of Silvercrest L.P. will continue to be a material use of our cash resources and will vary in amount and timing based on our operating results and dividend policy. We pay and intend to continue paying quarterly cash dividends to holders of our Class A common stock. We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership of interests in Silvercrest L.P. As a result, we will depend upon distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to pay any dividends to our Class A stockholders. We expect to cause Silvercrest L.P. to make distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover dividends, if any, declared by us. Our dividend policy has certain risks and limitations, particularly with respect to liquidity. Although we expect to pay dividends according to our dividend policy, we may not pay dividends according to our policy, or at all, if, among other things, we do not have the cash necessary to pay our intended dividends or our subsidiaries are prevented from making a distribution to us under the terms of our current credit facility or any future financing. To the extent we do not have cash on hand sufficient to pay dividends, we may decide not to pay dividends. By paying cash dividends rather than investing that cash in our future growth, we risk slowing the pace of our growth, or not having a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or unanticipated capital expenditures, should the need arise.

Our purchase of Class B units in Silvercrest L.P. that occurred concurrently with the consummation of our initial public offering, and the future exchanges of Class B units of Silvercrest L.P., are expected to result in increases in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Silvercrest L.P. at the time of our acquisition and these future exchanges, which will increase the tax depreciation and amortization deductions that otherwise would not have been available to us. These increases in tax basis and tax depreciation and amortization deductions are expected to reduce the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future. We entered into a tax receivable agreement with the current principals of Silvercrest L.P. and any future employee-holders of Class B units pursuant to which we agreed to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we actually realize as a result of these increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments thereunder. The timing of these payments is currently unknown. The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement will be a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P., and thus this liability has been recorded as an “other liability” on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing our actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had there been no increase in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Silvercrest L.P.

The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the tax receivable agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of our income and the tax rates then applicable. Nevertheless, we expect that as a result of the size of the increases in the tax basis of our tangible and intangible assets, the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement likely will be substantial. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefit of the increased depreciation and amortization of our assets, we expect that future payments to the selling principals of Silvercrest L.P. in respect of our purchase of Class B units from them will aggregate approximately ~~$9.8~~$10.0 million. Future payments to current principals of Silvercrest L.P. and future holders of Class B units in respect of subsequent exchanges would be in addition to these amounts and are expected to be substantial. We intend to fund required payments pursuant to the tax receivable agreement from the distributions received from Silvercrest L.P.

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Operating activities consist of net income subject to adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities, depreciation, and equity-based compensation expense. Investing activities consist primarily of acquiring and selling property and equipment, and cash paid as part of business acquisitions. Financing activities consist primarily of contributions from partners, distributions to partners, dividends paid on Class A common stock, the issuance and payments on partner notes, other financings, and earnout payments related to business acquisitions.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2020			2019
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,832		$	14,712
Net provided by operating activities							$	10,105		$	3,832
Net cash used in investing activities		(39,147	)		(631	)		(453	)		(39,147	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		6,873			(10,188	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities								(14,313	)		6,873
Net change in cash	$	(28,442	)	$	3,893		$	(4,661	)	$	(28,442	)

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, operating activities provided ~~$3.8~~$10.1 million and ~~$14.7~~$3.8 million, respectively. This difference is primarily the result of ~~a decrease~~an increase in net income of ~~$0.9~~$2.7 million, ~~increased~~decreased payouts of accrued

compensation of $5.8 million, a decrease in deferred rent expense of $3.7 million as a result of adopting ASC 842, an increase in accounts receivable of $3.2 million due to timing of payments received from clients, a decrease in equity based compensation expense of $0.3 million and a decrease in the adjustment to the tax receivable agreement of $0.8 million. This was partially offset by an increase in deferred tax expense of $1.8 million, an increase in prepaid and other expenses of $0.3$0.5 million, an increase in distributions received from investment funds of ~~$0.9~~$0.3 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease in accounts ~~payable and accrued expenses~~receivable of ~~$0.6~~$3.6 million due to timing of payments ~~to vendors and~~received from clients, an increase in non-cash lease expense of $2.4 million, an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of ~~$0.4~~$0.8 million primarily as a result of the Cortina Acquisition and the completion of renovations to our offices, a change in the tax receivable agreement adjustment of $0.2 million and an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $1.2 million. This was partially offset by a decrease in equity-based compensation expense of $1.7 million, a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $2.6 million, a decrease in deferred tax expense of $0.1 million and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.0 million, primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition.

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, investing activities used $0.5 million and $39.1 million, respectively. The primary use of cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was for the acquisition of furniture, equipment and ~~$0.6 million, respectively.~~leasehold improvements mostly related to the renovation of our office space in New York City. The primary use of cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was for cash paid at closing of the Neosho and Cortina Acquisitions and for the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements mostly related to the renovation of our office space in New York City. ~~The primary use of cash during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements.~~

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, financing activities ~~provided $6.9~~used $14.3 million and ~~used $10.2~~provided $6.9 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company ~~borrowed $18.0~~repaid $2.7 million ~~under its~~and $0.9 million, respectively, of principal on the term loan with City National ~~Bank and repaid $0.9 million of principal on the term loan.~~Bank. Distributions to partners during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 were $6.5 million and ~~2018 were~~ $7.4 million, ~~and $6.5 million,~~ respectively. ~~This increase is due to an increase in both distributions to partners and composite tax payments during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared with the prior period.~~ During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company paid dividends of ~~$3.9~~$4.6 million and ~~$3.5~~$3.9 million, respectively, to Class A shareholders. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, we made earnout payments of ~~$0.4~~$0.7 million and ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, we received payments from partners on notes receivable of $0.3 million and ~~$1.1~~$0.3 million, respectively.

We anticipate that distributions to principals of Silvercrest L.P. will continue to be a material use of our cash resources, and will vary in amount and timing based on our operating results and dividend policy.

As ~~described herein, we had outstanding fixed rate notes payable to Jamison, Eaton & Wood, Inc. and its principals related to the Jamison Acquisition, which were fully repaid as~~ of September 30, ~~2018.~~

~~As of September 30, 2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018, $17.1~~2019, $13.5 million and ~~$0,~~$16.2, respectively, was outstanding under the term loan with City National Bank.

As of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, nothing was outstanding on our revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

On June 30, 2015, we issued promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.2 million in connection with the Jamison Acquisition. The principal amount outstanding under the notes bore interest at 5%. The principal amounts of the notes were payable in three equal installments of approximately $722 thousand on each of June 30, 2016, 2017 and 2018. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $0 remained outstanding on the notes. As of September 30, 2019 and 2018 there was no accrued but unpaid interest on the notes payable related to the Jamison Acquisition.

We did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 or December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies during the ~~three~~nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~ 2020from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March ~~7, 2019.~~5, 2020.

Investment advisory fees are typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter, based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

We account for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606-10-32, Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula, by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, we are only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. We record performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue.

Because the majority of our revenues are earned based on assets under management that have been determined using fair value methods and since market appreciation/depreciation has a significant impact on our revenue, we have presented our assets under management using the GAAP framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs based on company assumptions (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. The three levels within the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

The table below summarizes the approximate amount of assets under management for the periods indicated for which fair value is measured based on Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.

As substantially all our assets under management are valued by independent pricing services based upon observable market prices or inputs, we believe market risk is the most significant risk underlying valuation of our assets under management, as discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and Item 3. “– Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk.”

The average value of our assets under management for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 was approximately ~~$22.6~~$24.1 billion and ~~$21.3~~$24.8 billion, respectively. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately ~~$2.3~~$2.4 billion and ~~$2.1~~$2.5 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately ~~$11.1~~$10.9 million and ~~$9.9~~$10.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, at a weighted average fee rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 of ~~0.49%~~0.45% and ~~0.47%~~0.43%, respectively.

The average value of our assets under management for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 was approximately ~~$20.2~~$22.1 billion. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately ~~$2.0~~$2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately ~~$9.9~~$10.2 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, at a weighted average fee rate for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 of ~~0.49%~~0.46%.

Information regarding recent accounting developments and their impact on the Company can be found in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in this filing.

Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as investment adviser for the separate accounts we manage and the funds for which we act as sub-investment adviser. Most of our revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 was derived from advisory fees, which are typically based on the market value of assets under management. Accordingly, a decline in the prices of securities would cause our revenue and income to decline due to a decrease in the value of the assets we manage. In addition, such a decline could cause our clients to withdraw their funds in favor of investments offering higher returns or lower risk, which would cause our revenue and income to decline further. Due to the nature of our business, we believe that we do not face any material risk from inflation. Please see our discussion of market risks in “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Revenue Recognition” which is part of Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) at September 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at September 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. We have not experienced any material impact to our internal controls over financial reporting despite the fact that most of our employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 pandemic situation on our internal controls to minimize the impact on their design and operating effectiveness.

The following risk factors are in addition to the risks described in the Company’s Form 10-K under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and in its subsequent periodic reports filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The information included in the "Risk Factors" section of the First and Second Quarter Form 10-Q’s is also incorporated by reference herein. However, the risks and uncertainties that we face are not limited to those set forth in the 2019 Form 10-K, as supplemented and updated in the First and Second Quarter Form 10-Q’s. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business and the trading price of our securities, particularly in light of the fast-changing nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, containment measures, the potential for future waves of outbreaks and the related impacts to economic and operating conditions. The effects of the events and circumstances described in the following risk factors may have the additional effect of heightening many of the risks contained in the Company’s Form 10-K and other periodic reports.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on our revenue levels, which we expect to continue for the rest of the year.

Our revenue is highly correlated to securities markets, and we expect that our assets under management and revenue levels will be negatively impacted, on an incremental basis, by the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on securities markets. While the COVID-19 pandemic did not materially affect the Company’s financial results and business operations in the Company’s first fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2020, economic and health conditions in the United States and across most of the globe have changed rapidly since the end of the first quarter, which has led to increased volatility and uncertainty in securities markets in the United States and across the globe. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic affected our operations in the second quarter ended June 30, 2020 and in the third quarter ended September 30, 2020, and may continue to do so indefinitely thereafter. While demand for the Company’s services continues given the current capital markets and overall economic environment, such demand may not continue and demand may decrease from historical levels depending on the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the length of time it takes for normal economic and operating conditions to resume, additional governmental actions that may be taken and/or extensions of time for restrictions that have been imposed to date, and numerous other uncertainties. Such events may result in business disruption, reduced earnings and operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The transmission of COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread have resulted in border closings and other travel restrictions and significant disruptions to business operations, supply chains and customer activity, including event cancellations and restrictions, service cancellations and wide-spread quarantines. These impacts and the uncertainty around the future impact of COVID-19, including the extent and duration of the impact on economies around the world, have caused significant volatility and declines in the global financial markets, which are expected to continue to result in business disruptions, reduced earnings and operations, which could materially affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

The ability of the Company’s employees to work may be significantly impacted by the coronavirus.

The Company’s employees are being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of our office and management personnel are working remotely. The health of the Company’s workforce is of primary concern and the Company may need to enact further precautionary measures to help minimize the risk of our employees being exposed to the coronavirus. Further, our management team is focused on mitigating the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has required and will continue to require a large investment of time and resources across the entire Company, thereby diverting their attention from other priorities that existed prior to the outbreak of the pandemic. If these conditions worsen, or last for an extended period of time, the Company’s ability to manage its business may be impaired, and operational risks, cybersecurity risks and other risks facing the Company even prior to the pandemic may be elevated.

The Company cannot predict the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its client, vendors, and other business partners.

The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting the Company’s clients, vendors, and other business partners, but the Company is not able to assess the full extent of the current impact nor predict the ultimate consequences that will result therefrom. We are working to obtain information about and maintain communications with our clients, vendors and business partners to coordinate efforts related to business continuity which may mitigate some, but not all, of the adverse effects resulting from the pandemic. If the Company’s clients, vendors and business partners are impacted by the pandemic for an extended period of time, the Company’s earnings and operations may be negatively impacted as well.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of New York, state of New York, on ~~October 31, 2019.~~November 5, 2020.

Title of each class		Trading Symbol(s)		Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share		SAMG		The Nasdaq Global Market

Part I	Financial Information
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3334
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5052
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5052
Part II	Other Information
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	53
Item 6.	Exhibits	5154


	Pro Forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019	Pro Forma Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Revenue	$80,508	$84,857
Net Income	$11,797	$16,899

Balance at January 1, 2019	$	755
Additions to estimated contingent consideration		15,417
Payments of contingent consideration		(425	)
Non-cash changes in fair value of estimated contingent consideration		174
Balance at December 31, 2019		15,921
Additions to estimated contingent consideration		—
Payments of contingent consideration		(741	)
Non-cash changes in fair value of estimated contingent consideration		(347	)
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	14,833

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class A common stock outstanding - January 1, ~~2019~~2020			~~8,518,096~~9,329,879
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	February 2020		155,224
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March ~~2019~~2020		~~17,074~~20,662
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	May ~~2019~~2020		~~84,268~~7,355
Issuance of Class A common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units	May ~~2019~~2020		1,896
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	June ~~2019~~2020		~~2,386~~5,400
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	August ~~2019~~2020		~~556,293~~24,191
Class A common shares outstanding – September 30, ~~2019~~2020			~~9,180,013~~9,544,607


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
Emerging growth company	☐

Cash paid on date of acquisition	$	17,072
Term loan with City National Bank drawdown		18,000
Units issued		8,952
Contingent consideration		13,800
Total purchase consideration	$	57,824

Monte Carlo Simulation Model	September 30, 2020			December 31, 2019			Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair Value	$	14,833		$	15,921			Level 3
Forecasted growth rate		16.1	%		18.6	%
Discount rate		11.6	%		10.5	%

Exhibit Number		Description

31.1**		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2**		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1***		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2***		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS**		Inline XBRL Instance Document – The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because iXBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

104**		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

		By:	/s/ Richard R. Hough III
Date:	~~October 31, 2019~~November 5, 2020		Richard R. Hough III
			Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
			(Principal Executive Officer)

			/s/ Scott A. Gerard
Date:	~~October 31, 2019~~November 5, 2020		Scott A. Gerard
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)