September 30,

December 31,

2020

2019

Assets

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$
328.9

$
3.7

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.9 in 2020 (2019 - $2.5)

91.3

78.6

Contract assets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 in 2020 (2019 - $2.9) (Note 3)

—

6.8

Inventory (Note 5)

1.2

8.5

Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 12)

12.3

8.8

Total current assets

433.7

106.4

Noncurrent assets

Goodwill (Note 6)

422.0

421.3

Other intangible assets, net (Note 7)

183.0

213.2

Capitalized acquisition costs, net (Note 8)

29.7

26.4

Equipment for lease, net (Note 9)

32.7

—

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 10)

14.0

15.4

Contract assets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 in 2020 (2019 - $1.7) (Note 3)

—

3.9

Other noncurrent assets

0.5

1.4

Total noncurrent assets

681.9

681.6

Total assets

$
1,115.6

$
788.0

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity/Members' (Deficit)

Current liabilities

Current portion of debt (Note 11)

$
1.8

$
5.3

Accounts payable

76.7

58.1

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (Note 12)

26.5

60.9

Deferred revenue (Note 3)

8.1

5.6

Total current liabilities

113.1

129.9

Noncurrent liabilities

Long-term debt (Note 11)

437.7

635.1

Deferred tax liability (Note 14)

5.2

4.1

Other noncurrent liabilities (Note 4)

2.1

4.8

Total noncurrent liabilities

445.0

644.0

Total liabilities

558.1

773.9

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

Redeemable preferred units, $100,000 par value; 430 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 (Note 18)

—

43.0

Members' deficit - Shift4 Payments, LLC (Note 19)

Class A Common units, $0 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019

—

—

Class B Common units, $323 par value; 1,010 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019

—

0.3

Members' equity

—

149.2

Stockholders' equity - Shift4 Payments, Inc. (Note 19)

Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2020, none issued and outstanding

—

—

Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 28,550,026 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020

—

—

Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 35,567,488 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020

—

—

Class C common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 15,920,291 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020

—

—

Additional paid-in capital

572.6

—

Retained deficit

(262.6
)

(178.4
)
Total stockholders' equity attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc./members' (deficit)

310.0

(28.9
)
Noncontrolling interests

247.5

—

Total stockholders' equity/members' (deficit)

557.5

(28.9
)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity/members' deficit

$
1,115.6

$
788.0


	September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,288.1	$	927.8
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $13.4 in 2021 ($5.7 in 2020) (Note 3)	184.4		92.7
Inventory	2.0		1.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 11)	13.2		11.5
Total current assets	1,487.7		1,033.5
Noncurrent assets
Goodwill (Note 5)	537.6		477.0
Other intangible assets, net (Note 6)	188.3		186.3
Capitalized acquisition costs, net (Note 7)	34.3		30.2
Equipment for lease, net (Note 8)	56.3		36.6
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 9)	17.8		15.1
Investments in securities (Note 1)	29.5		—
Deferred tax asset (Note 13)	1.5		—
Other noncurrent assets	2.1		0.6
Total noncurrent assets	867.4		745.8
Total assets	$	2,355.1	$	1,779.3
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of debt (Note 10)	$	—	$	0.9
Accounts payable	125.8		60.6
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (Note 11)	37.4		30.1
Deferred revenue (Note 3)	16.8		7.8
Total current liabilities	180.0		99.4
Noncurrent liabilities
Long-term debt (Note 10)	1,736.8		1,005.4
Deferred tax liability (Note 13)	—		2.8
Other noncurrent liabilities	2.9		1.7
Total noncurrent liabilities	1,739.7		1,009.9
Total liabilities	1,919.7		1,109.3
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)	0		0
Stockholders' equity (Note 18)
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, NaN issued and outstanding	—		—
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 51,508,608 and 39,737,950 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively	—		—
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 26,272,654 and 30,625,857 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively	—		—
Class C common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 5,139,890 and 10,188,852 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively	—		—
Additional paid-in capital	614.3		738.3
Retained deficit	(315.9)		(278.7)
Total stockholders' equity attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.	298.4		459.6
Noncontrolling interests (Note 19)	137.0		210.4
Total stockholders' equity	435.4		670.0
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,355.1	$	1,779.3

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial ~~statements~~.

(Unaudited) (in millions, except share and per share amounts)

Three months ended September 30,

Nine months ended September 30,

2020

2019

2020

2019

Gross revenue

$
214.8

$
193.8

$
556.0

$
529.3

Cost of sales

163.3

147.2

427.7

400.5

Gross profit

51.5

46.6

128.3

128.8

General and administrative expenses

35.5

37.5

147.0

90.1

Depreciation and amortization expense

16.2

10.1

37.1

29.7

Professional fees

2.9

3.3

5.8

7.1

Advertising and marketing expenses

0.8

1.6

2.9

4.4

Restructuring expenses (Note 4)

0.1

3.4

0.4

3.7

Other operating (income) expense, net (Note 3)

—

—

(12.4
)

—

Total operating expenses

55.5

55.9

180.8

135.0

Loss from operations

(4.0
)

(9.3
)

(52.5
)

(6.2
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 11)

—

—

(7.1
)

—

Other income, net

0.5

0.1

0.6

1.0

Interest expense

(7.1
)

(12.9
)

(32.1
)

(38.1
)
Loss before income taxes

(10.6
)

(22.1
)

(91.1
)

(43.3
)
Income tax benefit (provision) (Note 14)

0.7

(0.5
)

1.0

(1.0
)
Net loss (1)

(9.9
)

$
(22.6
)

(90.1
)

$
(44.3
)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (2)

(4.9
)

(5.9
)

Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc. (3)

$
(5.0
)

$
(84.2
)

Basic and diluted net loss per share: (4)

Class A net loss per share

$
(0.12
)

$
(0.15
)

Weighted average common stock outstanding

23,309,247

22,363,399

Class C net loss per share

$
(0.12
)

$
(0.15
)

Weighted average common stock outstanding

19,222,017

19,424,100

~~(1)~~

~~Net loss is equal to comprehensive loss.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is equal to comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.~~


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2021		2020		2021		2020
Gross revenue (a)	$	377.8	$	214.8	$	968.1	$	556.0
Cost of sales (b)	313.4		163.3		773.8		429.5
Gross profit	64.4		51.5		194.3		126.5
General and administrative expenses	48.1		35.4		153.3		144.8
Depreciation and amortization expense	15.0		16.2		45.9		37.1
Professional fees	3.3		2.9		13.0		5.8
Advertising and marketing expenses	3.5		0.8		26.1		2.9
Restructuring expenses (Note 4)	0.1		0.1		0.2		0.4
Other operating (income) expense, net (Note 3)	—		—		—		(12.4)
Total operating expenses	70.0		55.4		238.5		178.6
Loss from operations	(5.6)		(3.9)		(44.2)		(52.1)
Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 10)	—		—		(0.2)		(7.1)
Other income, net	0.2		0.5		0.2		0.6
Interest expense	(7.4)		(7.1)		(20.2)		(32.1)
Loss before income taxes	(12.8)		(10.5)		(64.4)		(90.7)
Income tax (expense) benefit (Note 13)	(1.0)		0.7		4.1		1.0
Net loss (c)	(13.8)		(9.8)		(60.3)		(89.7)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (d)	(4.6)		(4.8)		(21.5)		(83.7)
Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc. (e)	$	(9.2)	$	(5.0)	$	(38.8)	$	(6.0)
Basic and diluted net loss per share: (f)
Class A net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.17)	$	(0.12)	$	(0.72)	$	(0.15)
Class A weighted average common stock outstanding - basic and diluted	49,692,599		23,309,247		46,251,576		22,363,399

Class C net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.17)	$	(0.12)	$	(0.72)	$	(0.15)
Class C weighted average common stock outstanding - basic and diluted	6,117,997		19,222,017		8,078,943		19,424,100

~~(3)~~

~~Net loss attributable Shift4 Payments, Inc.is equal to comprehensive loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.~~

(a)For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, includes $22.4 million of payments to merchants associated with the TSYS outage, which are recorded as contra revenue and reflected as a reduction of "Gross revenue." See Note 3 for more information.

~~(4)~~

The amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 represent basic and diluted loss per share of Class A and Class C common stock and weighted average shares of Class A and Class C common stock outstanding for the period from June 5, 2020 through September 30, 2020, the period following the Reorganization Transactions and Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s initial public offering described in Note 1. See Note 23 for additional information on basic and diluted net loss per share.

(b)For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, includes $2.3 million of payments to partners associated with the TSYS outage. See Note 3 for more information.

(c)Net loss is equal to comprehensive loss.

(d)Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is equal to comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests, including the net loss for the period January 1, 2020 through June 4, 2020, the date the SEC declared effective the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed in connection with its IPO. See Note 1 for more information.

(e)Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc. is equal to comprehensive loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.

(f)For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, represents basic and diluted net loss per share of Class A and Class C common stock and weighted average shares of Class A and Class C common stock outstanding for the period from June 5, 2020 through September 30, 2020, the period following the Reorganization Transactions and Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s initial public offering described in Note 1. See Note 21 for additional information on basic and diluted net loss per share.

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN R~~EDEEMABLE~~REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY/ MEMBERS’ (DEFICIT)

(Unaudited) (in millions, except units and shares)

Redeemable
Preferred Units

Class A
Common Units

Class B
Common Units

Class A
Common Stock

Class B
Common Stock

Class C
Common Stock

Additional

Total

Units

Amount

Units

Amount

Units

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

paid-in
capital

Members'
Equity

Retained
Deficit

Noncontrolling
Interests

equity
(deficit)

Balances at December 31, 2019

430

$
43.0

100,000

$
—

1,010

$
0.3

—

$
—

—

$
—

-

$
—

$
—

$
149.2

$
(178.4
)
$
—

$
(28.9
)
Net loss

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(5.2
)

—

(5.2
)
Capital distributions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(0.1
)

—

—

(0.1
)
Preferred return on redeemable preferred units

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.2
)

—

—

(1.2
)
Balances at March 31, 2020

430

43.0

100,000

—

1,010

0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

147.9

(183.6
)

—

(35.4
)
Net loss prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(72.9
)

—

(72.9
)
Capital distributions

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(0.4
)

—

—

(0.4
)
Preferred return on redeemable preferred units

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(0.9
)

—

—

(0.9
)
Balances at June 4, 2020 prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement

430

43.0

100,000

—

1,010

0.3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

146.6

(256.5
)

—

(109.6
)
Reorganization transactions

(430
)

(43.0
)

(100,000
)

—

(1,010
)

(0.3
)

528,150

—

39,204,989

—

15,513,817

—

189.9

(146.6
)

—

—

43.0

Preferred dividends settled with LLC interests

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

2.3

—

—

—

2.3

Issuance of common stock in IPO and concurrent private placement

—

—

—

—

—

—

17,250,000

—

—

—

4,625,346

—

463.8

—

—

—

463.8

Allocation of equity to noncontrolling interests

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(211.5
)

—

—

211.5

—

Issuance of common stock for change of control contingent liabilities

—

—

—

—

—

—

915,503

—

—

—

—

—

21.1

—

—

—

21.1

Issuance of restricted stock units for change of control contingent liabilities

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

2.1

—

—

—

2.1

Equity-based compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

50.0

—

—

—

50.0

Net loss subsequent to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.1
)

(1.0
)

(2.1
)
Balances at June 30, 2020

—

—

—

—

—

—

18,693,653

—

39,204,989

—

20,139,163

—

517.7

—

(257.6
)

210.5

470.6

Issuance of Class A common stock in connection with Follow-on Offering

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,000,000

—

—

—

—

—

91.8

—

—

—

91.8

Allocation of equity to noncontrolling interests from Follow-on offering

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(45.7
)

—

—

45.7

—

Exchange of shares held by Searchlight

—

—

—

—

—

—

7,856,373

-

(3,637,501
)

—

(4,218,872
)

—

3.8

—

—

(3.8
)

—

Other

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1.2
)

—

—

—

(1.2
)
Equity-based compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

6.2

—

—

—

6.2

Net loss

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(5.0
)

(4.9
)

(9.9
)
Balances at September 30, 2020

—

$
—

—

$
—

—

$
—

28,550,026

$
—

35,567,488

$
—

15,920,291

$
—

$
572.6

$
—

$
(262.6
)
$
247.5

$
557.5


	Class A Common Stock			Class B Common Stock			Class C Common Stock			Additional paid-in capital		Retained Deficit		Noncontrolling Interests		Total equity
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount
Balances at December 31, 2020	39,737,950	$	—	30,625,857	$	—	10,188,852	$	—	$	738.3	$	(278.7)	$	210.4	$	670.0
Net loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		(32.8)		(18.2)		(51.0)
Cumulative effect of ASU 2020-06 adoption	—	—		—	—		—	—		(111.5)		1.6		—		(109.9)
Issuance of Class A common stock and fair value of equity-based compensation awards assumed in connection with VenueNext acquisition	325,127	—		—	—		—	—		13.5		—		12.8		26.3
Transfer from Founder of right associated with Inspiration4 seat	—	—		—	—		—	—		1.3		—		0.8		2.1
Exchange of shares held by Searchlight	2,000,000	—		(926,000)	—		(1,074,000)	—		6.3		—		(6.3)		—
Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		14.0		—		—		14.0
Vesting of restricted stock units, net of tax withholding	46,503	—		—	—		—	—		(1.4)		—		(1.0)		(2.4)
Balances at March 31, 2021	42,109,580	$	—	29,699,857	$	—	9,114,852	$	—	$	660.5	$	(309.9)	$	198.5	$	549.1
Net income	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		3.2		1.3		4.5
Exchange of shares held by Searchlight	3,152,165	—		(1,459,453)	—		(1,692,712)	—		7.9		—		(7.9)		—
Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		6.6		—		—		6.6
Vesting of restricted stock units, net of tax withholding	1,953,859	—		—	—		—	—		(73.7)		—		(40.3)		(114.0)
Balances at June 30, 2021	47,215,604	$	—	28,240,404	$	—	7,422,140	$	—	$	601.3	$	(306.7)	$	151.6	$	446.2
Net loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—		(9.2)		(4.6)		(13.8)
Issuance of Class A common stock and fair value of equity-based compensation awards assumed in connection with VenueNext acquisition	16,797	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—
Exchange of shares held by Searchlight	4,250,000	—		(1,967,750)	—		(2,282,250)	—		9.0		—		(9.0)		—
Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		6.4		—		—		6.4
Vesting of restricted stock units, net of tax withholding	26,207	—		—	—		—	—		(2.4)		—		(1.0)		(3.4)

Balances at September 30, 2021	51,508,608	$	—	26,272,654	$	—	5,139,890	$	—	$	614.3	$	(315.9)	$	137.0	$	435.4

~~See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY/ MEMBERS’ (DEFICIT) (continued)

(Unaudited) (in millions, except units and shares)

	Redeemable Preferred Units				Class A Common Units				Class B Common Units				Members'			Retained
	Units		Amount		Units		Amount		Units		Amount		Equity			Deficit			Total				Redeemable Preferred Units			Class A Common Units			Class B Common Units			Class A Common Stock			Class B Common Stock			Class C Common Stock			Additional paid-in capital			Members' Equity		Retained Deficit		Noncontrolling Interests		Total equity (deficit)
Balances at December 31, 2018		430	$	43.0		100,000	$	—		1,010	$	0.3	$	154.4		$	(113.3	)	$	41.4
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			(13.5	)		(13.5	)
Preferred return on redeemable preferred units		—		—		—		—		—		—		(1.2	)		—			(1.2	)
Cumulative effect of ASC 606 adoption		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			(7.0	)		(7.0	)
Balances at March 31, 2019		430		43.0		100,000		—		1,010		0.3		153.2			(133.8	)		19.7
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			(8.2	)		(8.2	)
																							Units	Amount		Units	Amount		Units	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Additional paid-in capital			Members' Equity		Retained Deficit		Noncontrolling Interests		Total equity (deficit)
Balances at December 31, 2019																						Balances at December 31, 2019	430	$	43.0	100,000	$	—	1,010	$	0.3	—	$	—	—	$	—	—	$	—
Net loss prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement																						Net loss prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—				—			—		(5.1)		—		(5.1)
Capital distributions		—		—		—		—		—		—		(0.1	)		—			(0.1	)	Capital distributions	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			(0.1)		—		—		(0.1)
Preferred return on redeemable preferred units		—		—		—		—		—		—		(1.3	)		—			(1.3	)	Preferred return on redeemable preferred units	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			(1.2)		—		—		(1.2)
Balances at June 30, 2019		430		43.0		100,000		—		1,010		0.3		151.8			(142.0	)		10.1
Balances at March 31, 2020																						Balances at March 31, 2020	430	$	43.0	100,000	$	—	1,010	$	0.3	—	$	—	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—		$	147.9	$	(187.5)	$	—	$	(39.3)
Net loss prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement																						Net loss prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			—		(72.8)		—		(72.8)
Capital distributions																						Capital distributions	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			(0.4)		—		—		(0.4)
Preferred return on redeemable preferred units																						Preferred return on redeemable preferred units	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			(0.9)		—		—		(0.9)
Balances at June 4, 2020 prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement																						Balances at June 4, 2020 prior to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement	430	$	43.0	100,000	$	—	1,010	$	0.3	—	$	—	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	—		$	146.6	$	(260.3)	$	—	$	(113.4)
Reorganization transactions																						Reorganization transactions	(430)	(43.0)		(100,000)	—		(1,010)	(0.3)		528,150	—		39,204,989	—		15,513,817	—		189.9			(146.6)		—		—		43.0
Preferred dividends settled with LLC interests																						Preferred dividends settled with LLC interests	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		2.3			—		—		—		2.3
Issuance of common stock in IPO and concurrent private placement																						Issuance of common stock in IPO and concurrent private placement	—	—		—	—		—	—		17,250,000	—		—	—		4,625,346	—		463.8			—		—		—		463.8
Allocation of equity to noncontrolling interests																						Allocation of equity to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(211.5)			—		—		211.5		—
Issuance of common stock for change of control contingent liabilities																						Issuance of common stock for change of control contingent liabilities	—	—		—	—		—	—		915,503	—		—	—		—	—		21.1			—		—		—		21.1
Issuance of restricted stock units for change of control contingent liabilities																						Issuance of restricted stock units for change of control contingent liabilities	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		2.1			—		—		—		2.1
Equity-based compensation																						Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		50.0			—		—		—		50.0
Net loss subsequent to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement																						Net loss subsequent to Reorganization Transactions, IPO and concurrent private placement	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			—		(1.0)		(1.0)		(2.0)
Balances at June 30, 2020																						Balances at June 30, 2020	—	$	—	—	$	—	—	$	—	18,693,653	$	—	39,204,989	$	—	20,139,163	$	—	$	517.7		$	—	$	(261.3)	$	210.5	$	466.9
Issuance of Class A common stock in connection with Follow-on offering																						Issuance of Class A common stock in connection with Follow-on offering	—	—		—	—		—	—		2,000,000	—		—	—		—	—		91.8			—		—		—		91.8
Allocation of equity to noncontrolling interest from Follow-on offering																						Allocation of equity to noncontrolling interest from Follow-on offering	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(45.7)			—		—		45.7		—
Exchange of shares held by Searchlight																						Exchange of shares held by Searchlight	—	—		—	—		—	—		7,856,373	—		(3,637,501)	—		(4,218,872)	—		3.8			—		—		(3.8)		—
Other																						Other	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		(1.2)			—		—		—		(1.2)
Equity-based compensation																						Equity-based compensation	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		6.2			—		—		—		6.2
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—			(22.6	)		(22.6	)	Net loss	—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—	—		—			—		(5.0)		(4.8)		(9.8)
Preferred return on redeemable preferred units		—		—		—		—		—		—		(1.4	)		—			(1.4	)
Balances at September 30, 2019		430	$	43.0		100,000	$	—		1,010	$	0.3	$	150.4		$	(164.6	)	$	(13.9	)
Balances at September 30, 2020																						Balances at September 30, 2020	—	$	—	—	$	—	—	$	—	28,550,026	$	—	35,567,488	$	—	15,920,291	$	—	$	572.6		$	—	$	(266.3)	$	247.6	$	553.9

As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had net capitalized costs to obtain contracts of $29.7 million and $26.4 million, respectively, included in “Capitalized acquisition costs, net”

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s restructuring accrual:

2018 Restructuring
Activities

2019 Restructuring
Activities

Total

Balance at December 31, 2019

$
4.2

$
1.5

$
5.7

Severance payments

(1.4
)

(1.5
)

(2.9
)
Accretion of interest (a)

0.4

—

0.4

Balance at September 30, 2020

$
3.2

$
—

$
3.2

	~~(a)~~
Balance at December 31, 2020		$	2.9
Severance payments		(1.2)
Accretion of interest ~~is included within “Restructuring expenses” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.~~ (a)		0.2
Balance at September 30, 2021		$	1.9

~~Accreted~~

(a)Accretion of interest is included within “Restructuring expenses” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company recognized ~~related to~~ restructuring ~~activities~~expenses associated with a historical acquisition ~~was~~of $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively.

The Company recognized $3.4 million and $3.7 million of restructuring expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. This was primarily comprised of $3.3 million of restructuring expenses associated with the integration of Merchant Link, consisting primarily of employee and severance benefits which were paid by March 31, 2020. In addition, accreted interest recognized related to restructuring activities associated with a historical acquisition was $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.

The current portion of the restructuring accrual of ~~$1.4~~$1.5 million and ~~$2.9~~$1.4 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, is included within “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the Company's unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The long-term portion of the restructuring accrual of ~~$1.8~~$0.4 million and ~~$2.8~~$1.5 million at September 30, ~~2020~~2021 and December 31, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively, is included within “Other noncurrent liabilities” on the Company's unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Of the ~~$3.2~~$1.9 million restructuring accrual outstanding as of September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, approximately $0.4 million is expected to be paid ~~in 2020, $1.6 million~~ in 2021 and $1.6 million in 2022, less accreted interest of ~~$0.4~~$0.1 million.

~~Table~~

5.Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of ~~Contents~~

~~SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, INC~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(in millions, except share, unit, per unit and merchant count amounts)~~

goodwill were as follows:

5.	~~Inventory~~
Balance at December 31, 2020		$	477.0
VenueNext acquisition (Note 2)		52.7
Postec acquisition (Note 2)		10.3
Hospitality Technology Vendor measurement period adjustments (Note 2)		(2.4)
Balance at September 30, 2021		$	537.6

~~Inventory~~

6.Other Intangible Assets, Net

Other intangible assets, net consisted of the following:

September 30,

December 31,

2020

2019

Terminal systems and components

$
0.7

$
5.9

Point-of-sale systems and components

0.5

2.6

Total inventory

$
1.2

$
8.5


	Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)	September 30, 2021
		Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Merchant relationships	8	$	200.1	$	126.7	$	73.4
Acquired technology	9	113.2		51.7		61.5
Trademarks and trade names	18	20.3		3.4		16.9
Capitalized software development costs	4	36.2		7.9		28.3
Residual commission buyouts (a)	3	13.2		5.0		8.2
Total intangible assets		$	383.0	$	194.7	$	188.3


	Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years)	December 31, 2020
		Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Merchant relationships	8	$	185.8	$	106.5	$	79.3
Acquired technology	9	105.1		42.2		62.9
Trademarks and trade names	9	57.4		39.1		18.3
Noncompete agreements	2	3.9		3.9		—
Capitalized software development costs	4	25.1		5.8		19.3
Leasehold interest	2	0.1		0.1		—
Residual commission buyouts (a)	3	20.0		13.5		6.5
Total intangible assets		$	397.4	$	211.1	$	186.3


(a)Residual commission buyouts include contingent payments of $3.9 million and $3.4 million as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

As of September 30, 2021, the estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter is as follows:


2021 (remaining three months)	$	14.1
2022	43.6
2023	30.9
2024	25.8
2025	23.2
Thereafter	50.7
Total	$	188.3

Amounts charged to expense in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for amortization of intangible assets were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2021		2020		2021		2020
Depreciation and amortization expense	$	8.2	$	9.8	$	27.7	$	28.7
Cost of sales	4.9		3.3		14.1		10.2
Total	$	13.1	$	13.1	$	41.8	$	38.9

7.Capitalized Acquisition Costs, Net

Capitalized acquisition costs, net were $34.3 million and$30.2 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. This consists of upfront processing bonuses with a gross carrying value of $65.2 million and$55.7 million and less accumulated amortization of $30.9 million and$25.5 million at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

Capitalized acquisition costs had a weighted average amortization period of three years at both September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Amortization expense for capitalized acquisition costs is $5.4 million and $15.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively, and $4.2 million and $11.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, and is included in “Cost of sales” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As of September 30, 2021, the estimated future amortization expense for capitalized acquisition costs is as follows:


2021 (remaining three months)	$	5.4
2022	17.1
2023	9.8
2024	2.0
Total	$	34.3

8.Equipment for Lease, Net

Equipment for lease, net consisted of the following:


	Weighted Average Depreciation Period (in years)	September 30, 2021
		Carrying Value		Accumulated Depreciation		Net Carrying Value
Equipment under lease	3	$	65.5	$	18.5	$	47.0
Equipment held for lease (a)	N/A	9.3		—		9.3
Total equipment for lease		$	74.8	$	18.5	$	56.3


	Weighted Average Depreciation Period (in years)	December 31, 2020
		Carrying Value		Accumulated Depreciation		Net Carrying Value
Equipment under lease	3	$	36.5	$	6.9	$	29.6
Equipment held for lease (a)	N/A	7.0		—		7.0
Total equipment for lease, net		$	43.5	$	6.9	$	36.6

(a)Represents equipment that was not yet initially deployed to a merchant and, accordingly, is not being depreciated.

The amount charged to “Depreciation and amortization expense” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for depreciation of equipment under lease was $5.8 million and $15.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, respectively, and $5.7 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020. Effective June 30, 2020, the Company modified the terms and conditions of its SaaS arrangements and updated its operational procedures. As a result, beginning June 30, 2020, hardware provided under the Company’s SaaS agreements is accounted for as an operating lease resulting in equipment held for lease to be recorded in “Equipment for lease, net” rather than “Inventory” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 9 for more information on equipment for lease.

6.	~~Goodwill~~

~~The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:~~

Balance at December 31, 2019

$
421.3

Measurement period adjustment (Note 2)

0.7

Balance at September 30, 2020

$
422.0

7.	~~Other Intangible Assets, Net~~

~~Other intangible assets, net consisted of the following:~~

Weighted Average

September 30, 2020

Amortization Period
(in years)

Carrying Value

Accumulated Amortization

Net Carrying Value

Merchant relationships

8

$
176.8

$
100.0

$
76.8

Acquired technology

10

105.2

40.2

65.0

Trademarks and trade names

9

55.5

36.8

18.7

Noncompete agreements

2

3.9

3.9

-

Capitalized software development costs

3

21.7

4.8

16.9

Leasehold interest

2

0.1

0.1

—

Residual commission buyouts (a)

3

18.1

12.5

5.6

Total intangible assets

$
381.3

$
198.3

$
183.0

Weighted Average

December 31, 2019

Amortization Period
(in years)

Carrying Value

Accumulated Amortization

Net Carrying Value

Merchant relationships

8

$
176.8

$
81.1

$
95.7

Acquired technology

10

105.2

32.2

73.0

Trademarks and trade names

9

55.5

30.1

25.4

Noncompete agreements

2

3.9

3.6

0.3

Capitalized software development costs

3

14.9

2.0

12.9

Leasehold interest

2

0.1

0.1

—

Residual commission buyouts (a)

3

15.7

9.8

5.9

Total intangible assets

$
372.1

$
158.9

$
213.2

~~(a)~~

~~Residual commission buyouts include contingent payments of $3.1 million and $2.7 million as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, INC~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(in millions, except share, unit, per unit~~9.Property, Plant and ~~merchant count amounts)~~

~~As of September 30, 2020, the estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years and thereafter is as follows:~~

Equipment, Net

~~Amounts charged to expense in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for amortization of intangible assets were as follows:~~

Capitalized acquisition costs, net were $29.7 million and $26.4 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. This consists of upfront processing bonuses with a gross carrying value of $52.3 million and $39.2 million and accumulated amortization of $22.6 million and $12.8 million at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

~~Capitalized acquisition costs had a weighted average amortization period of three years at September 30, 2020 and four years at December 31, 2019.~~

Amortization expense for capitalized acquisition costs is $4.2 million and $11.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, and $2.5 million and $6.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively, and is included in “Cost of sales” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

~~As of September 30, 2020, the estimated future amortization expense for capitalized acquisition costs is as follows:~~

Effective June 30, 2020, the Company modified the terms and conditions of its SaaS arrangements and updated its operational procedures. As a result, beginning June 30, 2020, hardware provided under the Company’s SaaS agreements is accounted for as an operating lease resulting in equipment for lease recorded in “Equipment for lease, net” on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

As of September 30, 2020, the cost, accumulated depreciation and net carrying value of equipment for lease was $36.0 million, $3.3 million and $32.7 million, respectively. Included in this amount was $7.3 million of equipment that was not yet initially deployed to a merchant and, accordingly, is not being depreciated.

Amounts charged to expense in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for depreciation of equipment under lease were $5.7 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.

~~Additional information regarding the contingent liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis is presented in the following tables:~~

The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the Level 3 contingent liabilities:

As of December 31, 2019, Shift4 Payments, LLC had 430 non-convertible redeemable preferred units (with a stated value at $100,000 per unit) authorized, issued and outstanding with a carrying value and liquidation value of $43.0 million.

Excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 are 2,171,660 employee RSUs and 46,170 non-employee director RSUs because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Additionally, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and for the period from June 5, 2020 through September 30, 2020, 35,567,488 shares of Class A common stock, convertible upon redemption of the noncontrolling interest by the Continuing Equity Owners,

On October 16, 2020, the Company acquired a hospitality technology vendor, for approximately $10.0 million. This acquisition enables the boarding of the vendor’s customers on the Company’s end-to-end acquiring solution and empowers the Company’s distribution partners to sign the vendor’s customer accounts and leverage the combined expertise to handle all aspects of installation, service, and support.

On November 4, 2020, the Company acquired Infomart2000 Corp., which does business as 3dcart, for approximately $40.0 million in cash and $19.6 million in shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The acquisition expands the Company’s omni-channel transaction capabilities and will enable 3dcart merchants to augment their ecommerce platform experience with the Company’s secure integrated payments solutions. In addition, the Company’s indirect sales distribution network will be able to offer 3dcart’s turnkey ecommerce capabilities to the Company’s new and existing POS and payments customers.

We are a leading independent provider of ~~integrated~~ payment processing and technology solutions in the United States based on total volume of payments processed. We have achieved our leadership position through decades of solving ~~complex~~ business and operational challenges facing our ~~customers: software partners and merchants.~~customers. For our software partners, we offer a single integration to an end-to-end payments offering, a proprietary gateway and a robust suite of technology solutions to enhance the value of their software and simplify payment acceptance. For our merchants, we provide a seamless, unified consumer experience as an alternative to relying on multiple providers to accept payments and utilize technology in their businesses.

The historical results of operations discussed in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are those of (1) Shift4 Payments, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries for periods prior to the Reorganization Transactions on June 4, 2020 and (2) Shift4 Payments, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries for periods beginning on or following the Reorganization Transactions on June 4, 2020. The historical results of operations and financial condition of Shift4 Payments, LLC prior to the completion of the Reorganization Transactions, including the IPO and concurrent private placement, do not reflect certain items that we expect will affect our results of operations and financial condition after giving effect to the Reorganization Transactions and the use of proceeds from the IPO and concurrent private placement.

The Reorganization Transactions resulted in Shift4 Payments, Inc. becoming the sole managing member of Shift4 Payments, LLC. As the sole managing member of Shift4 Payments, LLC, we operate and control all of the business and affairs of Shift4 Payments, LLC. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial results of Shift4 Payments, LLC, and report a noncontrolling interest related to the interests in Shift4 Payments, LLC held by the Continuing Equity Holders on our consolidated financial statements.

After consummation of the IPO, Shift4 Payments, Inc. became subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes with respect to our allocable share of any taxable income of Shift4 Payments, LLC and is taxed at the prevailing corporate tax rates. In addition to tax expenses, we also have and will continue to incur public company expenses related to our operations, plus payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, or TRA, which we expect to be significant. We intend to cause Shift4 Payments, LLC to make distributions to us in an amount sufficient to allow us to pay our tax obligations and operating expenses, including distributions to fund any payments due under the TRA.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense was $7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $12.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, a decrease of $5.8 million or 45.0%. This decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the pre-payments for the First Lien and Second Lien Term Loan Facilities, as well as the repayment of the Revolving Credit Facility, in June 2020.

~~Income tax provision~~

The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2020 was (6.6)%, compared to the effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2019 of 2.3%. The 2020 income tax benefit was different than the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 21% primarily due to the loss allocated to the noncontrolling interest and the changes in the valuation allowances in the U.S. The 2019 income tax expense was different than the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 21% primarily due to Shift4 Payments, LLC being treated as a partnership and not paying income tax. The change in the effective tax rate between the periods was primarily a result of a mix of earnings between entities and the change in the noncontrolling interest and valuation allowance adjustment.

~~Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests~~

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of Shift4 Payments, LLC was $(4.9) million for the three months ended September 30, 2020. There was no net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of Shift4 Payments, LLC for the three months ended September 30, 2019 as the Reorganization Transactions occurred on June 4, 2020 and the IPO was consummated on June 9, 2020.

~~Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.~~

~~Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc. was $(5.0) million for the three months ended September 30, 2020.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Comparison of results for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019~~

~~The following table sets forth the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented.~~

Nine months ended September 30,

(in millions)

2020

2019

$ change

% change

Payments-based revenue

$
494.4

$
465.4

$
29.0

6.2
%
Subscription and other revenues

61.6

63.9

(2.3
)

(3.6
%)
Total gross revenue

556.0

529.3

26.7

5.0
%
Less: network fees

321.8

308.0

13.8

4.5
%
Less: Other costs of sales

105.9

92.5

13.4

14.5
%
Gross profit

128.3

128.8

(0.5
)

(0.4
%)
General and administrative expenses

147.0

90.1

56.9

63.2
%
Depreciation and amortization expense

37.1

29.7

7.4

24.9
%
Professional fees

5.8

7.1

(1.3
)

(18.3
%)
Advertising and marketing expenses

2.9

4.4

(1.5
)

(34.1
%)
Restructuring expenses

0.4

3.7

(3.3
)

(89.2
%)
Other operating (income) expense, net

(12.4
)

—

(12.4
)

NM

Total operating expenses

180.8

135.0

45.8

33.9
%
Loss from operations

(52.5
)

(6.2
)

(46.3
)

NM

Loss on extinguishment of debt

(7.1
)

—

(7.1
)

NM

Other income, net

0.6

1.0

(0.4
)

(40.0
%)
Interest expense

(32.1
)

(38.1
)

6.0

(15.7
%)
Loss before income taxes

(91.1
)

(43.3
)

(47.8
)

110.4
%
Income tax benefit (provision)

1.0

(1.0
)

2.0

(200.0
%)
Net loss

(90.1
)

$
(44.3
)

$
(45.8
)

103.4
%
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

(5.9
)

Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.

$
(84.2
)

~~Gross Revenue~~

~~Gross revenue was $556.0~~$45.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2020,~~2021, compared to ~~$529.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, an increase of $26.7 million or 5.0%. Gross revenue is comprised of payments-based revenue and subscription and other revenues.~~

Payments-based revenue was $494.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $465.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, an increase of $29.0 million or 6.2%. The increase in payments-based revenue was driven by an increase in end-to-end payment volume of $1.4 billion or 8.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted our end-to-end payment volumes beginning mid-March when shelter-in-place, social distancing, the closing of non-essential businesses and other restrictive measures were first put in place across the United States. Since late March, we have seen a significant recovery in our end-to-end payment volumes and, for the trailing seven days leading up to September 30, 2020, end-to-end payment volumes are approximately 97% of pre-COVID-volumes in 2020.

Subscription and other revenues were $61.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $63.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, a decrease of $2.3 million or 3.6%. The decrease is due to hardware provided under our SaaS arrangements being accounted for as operating leases, effective June 30, 2020. In addition, customer billing revenue declined $5.8 million primarily due to temporary fee waivers of $1.9 million on certain products from March 2020 through June 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as a decline in hardware revenue and software license sales of $2.6 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019. This was partially offset by the Merchant Link Acquisition, which contributed $7.2 million more to subscription and other revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

~~Network Fees~~

Network fees were $321.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $308.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, an increase of $13.8 million or 4.5%. This increase is correlated with the increase in end-to-end payment volume as described above.

~~Table of Contents~~

Gross revenue less network fees was $234.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $221.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, an increase of $12.9 million or 5.8%. The increase in gross revenue less network fees is correlated with the increase in end-to-end payment volume. See “—Key performance indicators and non-GAAP measures” for a reconciliation of gross profit to gross revenue less network fees.

~~Other costs of sales~~

Other costs of sales was $105.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $92.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, an increase of $13.4 million, or 14.5%. This increase was primarily a result of:

~~higher gross revenue less network fees driving higher residual commissions of $5.0 million;~~

~~the Merchant Link Acquisition, which contributed $3.8 million more to other costs of sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019;~~

~~higher capitalized acquisition cost amortization of $4.0 million related to deal bonuses;~~

~~an increase in equipment purchased of $1.4 million;~~

~~higher capitalized software development amortization of $1.4 million; partially offset by,~~

the impact of modifying the terms and conditions of our SaaS arrangements and updating our operational procedures to account for our hardware as operating leases, which resulted in a decline of $4.5 million in costs of sales. Effective June 30, 2020, equipment leased to merchants is capitalized as a fixed asset, whereas prior to June 30, 2020, these arrangements were accounted for as sales-type leases and expensed when deployed.

~~Operating expenses~~

~~General and administrative expenses.~~ General and administrative expenses were $147.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, compared to $90.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, an increase of $56.9 million or 63.2%. The increase was primarily due to equity-based compensation expense of $56.2 million and $10.3 million in change of control liabilities recognized as a result of the IPO, partially offset by $23.1 million in non-cash adjustments for contingent liability valuations and deferred compensation arrangements. See Note 22 to our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for more information on equity-based compensation and Note 13 to our accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on these contingent liabilities. In addition, general and administrative expenses increased $13.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019 due to the Merchant Link Acquisition.

~~Depreciation and amortization expense.~~ ~~Depreciation and amortization expense was~~ $37.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, ~~compared to $29.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019,~~ an increase of ~~$7.4~~$8.8 million or ~~24.9%~~23.7%. The increase was primarily due to hardware provided under our SaaS arrangements being accounted for as operating leases, effective June 30, 2020, while previously they were accounted for as sales-type leases ~~impacting~~driving higher depreciation expense ~~by $5.7~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2020, of $9.7 million. See ~~Notes~~Note 3 ~~and 9~~in the notes to ~~our~~the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on the change ~~in our~~to the terms and conditions of our SaaS arrangements.

In addition, the recent acquisitions of VenueNext, 3dcart, a hospitality technology vendor and Postec collectively increased depreciation and amortization expense $1.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2021. This was partially offset by a decline in intangible amortization expense as certain intangible assets reached the end of their amortization period.

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, cash provided by operating activities of $33.1 million is primarily a result of:~~

On March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, and governmental authorities around the world have implemented measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19. These measures, including “shelter-in-place” orders suggested or mandated by governmental authorities or otherwise elected by companies as a preventive measure, have adversely affected workforces, customers, consumer sentiment, economies, and financial markets, and, along with decreased consumer spending, have led to an economic downturn in the United States.

~~Numerous state and local jurisdictions, including in markets where~~3, 2021, we ~~operate, have imposed, and others in the future may impose, “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines, travel restrictions, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions~~acquired VenueNext for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19. For example, the federal and state governments in the United States have imposed social distancing measures and restrictions on movement, only allowing essential businesses to remain open. Such orders or restrictions have resulted in the temporary closure of many of our merchant operations, work stoppages, slowdowns and delays, mandatory remote operations, travel restrictions and cancellation of events, among other effects, any of which may materially impact our business and results of operations.

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced a significant decrease in our payments volumes and expect the impact of shelter-in-place orders and other government measures to continue to significantly impact our business, results of operations and cash flows for the foreseeable future. As result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of our hospitality merchants have experienced an 80% or greater decline in transaction volumes from pre-COVID-19 levels and many of our restaurant merchants are limited to take-out or delivery business only.

~~Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, we:~~

~~drew~~ $68.5 million ~~under our revolving credit facility~~ in ~~the first quarter of 2020, which was repaid in the second quarter of 2020;~~

~~furloughed approximately 25% of our employees. As of September 30, 2020, we reinstated substantially all of our workforce and are hiring in certain areas to accommodate new merchant onboarding;~~

~~accelerated approximately $30.0 million of annual expense reduction plans related to previous acquisitions;~~

~~re-prioritized our capital projects;~~

~~instituted a company-wide hiring freeze, which has been lifted since August 2020; and~~

~~reduced salaries for management across the organization, which were partially reinstated as of August 2020.~~

Due to the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will continue to assess the situation, including abiding by any government-imposed restrictions, market by market. We are unable to accurately predict the ultimate impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our operations going forward due to uncertainties that will be dictated by the length of time that such disruptions continue, which will, in turn, depend on the currently unknowable duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of governmental regulations that might be imposed in response to the pandemic, the impact of remote operations, the speed and extent to which normal economic and operating conditions will resume and overall changes in consumer behavior.aggregate purchase consideration. In particular, even as our merchants re-open and adapt their operations, we cannot accurately predict the ongoing impact of government regulations and changing consumer behavior on our business. While we have not seen a meaningful degradation in new merchant sign-ups or an increase in existing merchant attrition as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible that those business trends change if economic hardship across the country forces merchant closures. Any significant reduction in consumer visits to, or spending at, our merchants, would result in a loss of revenue to us. In particular, we cannot accurately forecast the potential impact of additional outbreaks as government restrictions are relaxed, further shelter-in-place or other government restrictions implemented in response to such outbreaks, the impact that weather has on merchants as a result of such restrictions, or the impact on the ability of our merchants to remain in business as a result of the ongoing pandemic, which could result in additional chargeback or merchant receivable losses, any future outbreak or any government restrictions related thereto.

~~Table of Contents~~

In addition, the global deterioration in economic conditions, which may have an adverse impact on discretionary consumer spending, could also impact our business. For instance, consumer spending may be negatively impacted by general macroeconomic conditions, including a rise in unemployment, and decreased consumer confidence resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Changing consumer behaviors as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic may also have a material impact on our payments-based revenue for the foreseeable future, particularly for the hospitality and restaurant industries, verticals upon which we have predominantly focused on over the last decade.

In the past, governments have taken unprecedented actions in an attempt to address and rectify these extreme market and economic conditions by providing liquidity and stability to financial markets. If these actions are not successful, or if governments do not provide continued assistance needed as a result of COVID-19, the return of adverse economic conditions may cause a material impact on our ability to raise capital, if needed, on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or at all.

To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, such as those relating to our liquidity, indebtedness and our ability to comply with the covenants contained in the agreements that govern our indebtedness.

~~Substantial and increasingly intense competition worldwide in the financial services, payments and payment technology industries may adversely affect our overall business and operations.~~

The financial services, payments and payment technology industries are highly competitive, and our payment services and solutions compete against all forms of financial services and payment systems, including cash and checks and electronic, mobile, ecommerce and integrated payment platforms. Many of the areas in which we compete are evolving rapidly with changing and disruptive technologies, shifting user needs, and frequent introductions of new products and services. We compete against a wide range of businesses with varying roles within the payments value chain. If we are unable to differentiate ourselves from our competitors and drive value for our customers, we may not be able to compete effectively. Our competitors may introduce their own value-added or other innovative services or solutions more effectively than we do, which could adversely impact our current competitive position and prospects for growth. Our competitors also may be able to offer and provide services that we do not offer. We also compete against new entrants that have developed alternative payment systems, ecommerce payment systems, payment systems for mobile devices and customized integrated software payment solutions. Failure to compete effectively against any of these competitive threats could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, some of our competitors are larger and/or have greater financial resources than us, enabling them to maintain a wider range of product offerings, mount extensive promotional campaigns and be more aggressive in offering products and services at lower rates, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Potential changes in competitive landscape, including disintermediation from other participants in the payments chain, could harm our business.~~

~~We expect the competitive landscape will continue to change in a variety of ways, including:~~

rapid and significant changes in technology, resulting in new and innovative payment methods and programs, that could place us at a competitive disadvantage and reduce the use of our products and services;

competitors, including third-party processors (such as Chase Paymentech, Elavon, Fiserv, Global Payments and Worldpay) and integrated payment providers (such as Adyen, Lightspeed POS, Shopify and Square), merchants, governments and/or other industry participants may develop products and services that compete with or replace our value-added products and services, including products and services that enable payment networks and banks to transact with consumers directly;

participants in the financial services, payments and payment technology industries may merge, create joint ventures, or form other business combinations that may strengthen their existing business services or create new payment services that compete with our services; and

new services and technologies that we develop may be impacted by industry-wide solutions and standards related to migration to Europay, Mastercard and Visa, or EMV, standards, including chip technology, tokenization and other safety and security technologies.

Certain competitors could use strong or dominant positions in one or more markets to gain a competitive advantage against us, such as by integrating competing platforms or features into products they control such as search engines, web browsers, mobile device operating systems or social networks; by making acquisitions; or by making access to our platform more difficult. Further, current and future competitors could choose to offer a different pricing model or to undercut prices in the market or our prices in an effort to increase their market share. Failure to compete effectively against any of these or other competitive threats could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our ability to anticipate and respond to changing industry trends and the needs and preferences of our merchants and consumers may adversely affect our competitiveness or the demand for our products and services.

The financial services, payments and payments technology industries are subject to rapid technological advancements, resulting in new products and services, including mobile payment applications and customized integrated software payment solutions, and an evolving competitive landscape, as well as changing industry standards and merchant and consumer needs and preferences. We expect that new services and technologies applicable to the financial services, payments and payment technology industries will continue to emerge and external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic may accelerate such emergence. These changes may limit the competitiveness of and demand for our services. Also, our merchants continue to adopt new technology for business. We must anticipate and respond to these changes in order to remain competitive within our relative markets. In addition, failure to develop value-added services that meet the needs and preferences of our merchants could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively in our industry. Any new solution we develop or acquire might not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner and might not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. In addition, these solutions could become subject to legal or regulatory requirements, which could prohibit or slow the development and provision of such new solutions and/or our adoption thereof. Furthermore, our merchants’ potential negative reaction to our products and services can spread quickly through social media and damage our reputation before we have the opportunity to respond. Improving and enhancing the functionality, performance, reliability, design, security and scalability of our platform is expensive, time-consuming and complex, and to the extent we are not able to do so in a manner that responds to our merchants’ evolving needs, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected. If we are unable to anticipate or respond to technological or industry standard changes on a timely basis, our ability to remain competitive could be adversely affected.

~~Because we rely on third-party vendors to provide products and services, we could be adversely impacted if they fail to fulfill their obligations.~~

We depend on third-party vendors for certain products and services, including components of our computer systems, software, data centers and telecommunications networks, to conduct our business. Any changes in these systems that degrade the functionality of our products and services, impose additional costs or requirements on it, or give preferential treatment to competitors’ services, including their own services, could materially and adversely affect usage of our products and services. For example, we are dependent on our relationship with a single third-party processor for services such as merchant authorization, processing, risk and chargeback monitoring accounting and clearing and settlement for the transactions we service. In the event our agreement with our third-party processor is terminated, or if upon its expiration we are unable to renew the contract on terms favorable to us, or at all, it may be difficult for us to replace these services which may adversely affect our operations and profitability.

We also rely on third parties for specific software and devices used in providing our products and services. Some of these organizations and service providers provide similar services and technology to our competitors, and we do not have long-term or exclusive contracts with them.

Our systems and operations or those of our merchants and software partners could be exposed to damage or interruption from, among other things, fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, unauthorized entry, computer viruses, denial-of-service attacks, acts of terrorism, human error, vandalism or sabotage, financial insolvency, bankruptcy and similar events. For example, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may impact our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. In addition, we may be unable to renew our existing contracts with our most significant merchants and software and partners or our merchants and software partners may stop providing or otherwise supporting the products and services we obtain from them, and we may not be able to obtain these or similar products or services on the same or similar terms as our existing arrangements, if at all. The failure of our third-party vendors to perform their obligations and provide the products and services we obtain from them in a timely manner for any reason could adversely affect our operations and profitability due to, among other consequences:

~~loss of revenues;~~

~~loss of merchants and software partners;~~

~~loss of merchant and cardholder data;~~

~~fines imposed by payment networks;~~

~~harm to our business or reputation resulting from negative publicity;~~

~~exposure to fraud losses or other liabilities;~~

~~additional operating and development costs; or~~

~~diversion of management, technical and other resources.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Health concerns arising from the outbreak of a health epidemic or pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business.~~

In addition to the COVID-19 pandemic, our business could be materially and adversely affected by the outbreak of a widespread health epidemic or pandemic, including arising from various strains of avian flu or swine flu, such as H1N1, particularly if located in the United States. The occurrence of such an outbreak or other adverse public health developments could materially disrupt our business and operations. Such events could also significantly impact our industry and cause a temporary closure of our merchants’ businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, other viruses may be transmitted through human contact, and the risk of contracting viruses could cause consumers to avoid gathering in public places or patronizing certain businesses, which could adversely affect payment volumes. We could also be adversely affected if government authorities impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures, impose restrictions on operations of our merchants’ businesses, or restrict the import or export of hardware and equipment. Even if such measures are not implemented and a virus or other disease does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or health risk may adversely affect our business and operating results.

~~We may not be able to continue to expand our share of the existing payment processing markets or expand into new markets which would inhibit our ability to grow and increase our profitability.~~

Our future growth and profitability depend upon the growth of the markets in which we currently operate and our ability to increase our penetration and service offerings within these markets, as well as the emergence of new markets for our services and our ability to successfully expand into these new markets. It is difficult to attract new merchants because of potential disadvantages associated with switching payment processing vendors, such as transition costs, business disruption and loss of accustomed functionality. There can be no assurance that our efforts to overcome these factors will be successful, and this resistance may adversely affect our growth. A merchant’s payment processing activity with us may also decrease for a variety of reasons, including the merchant’s level of satisfaction with our products and services, the effectiveness of our support services, pricing of our products and services, the pricing and quality of competing products or services, the effects of global economic conditions (including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic), or reductions in the consumer spending levels.

Our expansion into new markets is also dependent upon our ability to adapt our existing technology and offerings or to develop new or innovative applications to meet the particular service needs of each new market. In order to do so, we will need to anticipate and react to market changes and devote appropriate financial and technical resources to our development efforts, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in these efforts.

Furthermore, we may expand into new geographical markets, including foreign countries, in which we do not currently have any operating experience. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully continue such expansion efforts due to our lack of experience in such markets and the multitude of risks associated with global operations, including the possibility of needing to obtain appropriate regulatory approval.

Our services and products must integrate with a variety of operating systems, software, device and web browsers, and our business may be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to ensure that our services interoperate with such operating systems, device, software and web browsers.

We are dependent on the ability of our products and services to integrate with a variety of operating systems, software and devices, such as the point-of-sale, or POS, terminals we provide to merchants, as well as web browsers that we do not control. Any changes in these systems that degrade the functionality of our products and services, impose additional costs or requirements on us, or give preferential treatment to competitive services, could materially and adversely affect usage of our products and services. In addition, system integrators may show insufficient appetite to enable our products and services to integrate with a variety of operating systems, software and devices. In the event that it is difficult for our merchants to access and use our products and services, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

We depend, in part, on our merchant and software partner relationships and strategic partnerships with various institutions to operate and grow our business. If we are unable to maintain these relationships and partnerships, our business may be adversely affected.

We depend, in part, on our merchant and software partner relationships and partnerships with various institutions to operate and grow our business. We rely on the growth of our merchant and other strategic relationships, and our ability to maintain these relationships and other distribution channels, to support and grow our business. If we fail to maintain these relationships, or if our software partners or other strategic partners fail to maintain their brands or decrease the size of their branded networks, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, our contractual arrangements with our merchants and other strategic partners vary in length, and may also allow for early termination upon the occurrence of certain events. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew these contractual arrangements on similar terms or at all. The loss of merchant or software partner relationships could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

We rely on our sponsor bank to provide sponsorship to card and other payment networks and treasury services. If our sponsor bank stops providing sponsorship and treasury services, we would need to find one or more other financial institutions to provide those services. If we are unable to find a replacement institution, we may no longer be able to provide processing services to certain merchants, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In the event of a chargeback, merchant bankruptcy or other failure to fund, or other intervening failure in the payment network system, we may be unable to recoup certain payments, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

A significant number of our merchants are small- and medium-sized businesses and small affiliates of large companies, which can be more difficult and costly to retain than larger enterprises and may increase the impact of economic fluctuations on us.

We market and sell our products and services to, among others, small to medium sized businesses, or SMBs. To continue to grow our revenue, we must add merchants, sell additional services to existing merchants and encourage existing merchants to continue doing business with us. However, retaining SMBs can be more difficult than retaining large enterprises, as SMB merchants:

~~often have higher rates of business failure and more limited resources;~~

~~may have decisions related to the choice of payment processor dictated by their affiliated parent entity; and~~

~~are more able to change their payment processors than larger organizations dependent on our services.~~

SMBs are typically more susceptible to the adverse effects of economic fluctuations, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Adverse changes in the economic environment or business failures of our SMB merchants may have a greater impact on us than on our competitors who do not focus on SMBs to the extent that we do. As a result, we may need to attract and retain new merchants at an accelerated rate or decrease our expenses to reduce negative impacts on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Global economic, political and other conditions may adversely affect trends in consumer, business and government spending, which may adversely impact the demand for our services and our revenue and profitability.

The financial services, payments and payment technology industries in which we operate depend heavily upon the overall level of consumer, business and government spending. A sustained deterioration in general economic conditions (including distress in financial markets and turmoil in specific economies around the world), in particular as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, may adversely affect our financial performance by reducing the number or average purchase amount of transactions we process. See “—The recent novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, global pandemic has had and is expected to continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.” A reduction in the amount of consumer spending or credit card transactions could result in a decrease of our revenue and profits.

~~Adverse economic trends may accelerate the timing, or increase the impact of, risks to our financial performance. These trends could include:~~

~~declining economies and the pace of economic recovery can change consumer spending behaviors, on which the majority of our revenue is dependent;~~

low levels of consumer and business confidence typically associated with recessionary environments, and those markets experiencing relatively high unemployment, may result in decreased spending by cardholders;

~~budgetary concerns in the United States and other countries around the world could affect the United States and other sovereign credit ratings, which could impact consumer confidence and spending;~~

~~financial institutions may restrict credit lines to cardholders or limit the issuance of new cards to mitigate cardholder credit concerns;~~

~~uncertainty and volatility in the performance of our merchants’ businesses, particularly SMBs, may make estimates of our revenues and financial performance less predictable;~~

~~cardholders or merchants may decrease spending for value-added services we market and sell; and~~

government intervention, including the effect of laws, regulations and government investments in our merchants, may have potential negative effects on our business and our relationships with our merchants or otherwise alter their strategic direction away from our products and services.

In addition, the banking industry remains subject to consolidation regardless of overall economic conditions. In times of economic distress, various financial institutions in the markets we serve have been acquired or merged with and into other financial institutions, including those with which we partner. If a current referral partner of ours is acquired by another bank, the acquiring bank may seek to terminate our agreement and impose its own merchant services program on the acquired bank. We may be unable to retain our banking relationships post-acquisition, or may have to offer financial concessions to do so, which could adversely affect our results of operations or growth.

We may in the future offer merchant acquiring and processing services in geographies outside of the United States, including potentially in the European Union or the United Kingdom. In such circumstances, we may become subject to additional European Union and United Kingdom financial regulatory requirements and we could become subject to risks associated with the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union (including any resulting economic downturn) following the United

~~Table of Contents~~

Kingdom’s exit from the European Union (Brexit) on January 31, 2020. We are subject to risks associated with operations in international markets, including changes in foreign governmental policies and requirements applicable to our business, including the presence of more established competitors and our lack of experience in such non-U.S. markets. In addition, any future partners in non-U.S. jurisdictions, may also be acquired, reorganized or otherwise disposed of in the event of further market turmoil or losses in their loan portfolio that result in such financial institutions becoming less than adequately capitalized. Our revenue derived from these and other non-U.S. operations will be subject to additional risks, including those resulting from social and geopolitical instability and unfavorable political or diplomatic developments, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In the event we expand internationally, we may face challenges due to the presence of more established competitors and our lack of experience in such non-U.S. markets. If we are unable to successfully manage these risks relating to the international expansion of our business, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are subject to governmental regulation and other legal obligations, particularly related to privacy, data protection and information security, and consumer protection laws across different markets where we conduct our business. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our business.

In the United States and other jurisdictions in which our services are used, we are subject to various consumer protection laws (including laws on disputed transactions) and related regulations. If we are found to have breached any consumer protection laws or regulations in any such market, we may be subject to enforcement actions that require us to change our business practices in a manner which may negatively impact our revenue, as well as expose ourselves to litigation, fines, civil and/or criminal penalties and adverse publicity that could cause our customers to lose trust in us, negatively impacting our reputation and business in a manner that harms our financial position.

As part of our business, we collect personally identifiable information, also referred to as personal data, and other potentially sensitive and/or regulated data from our consumers and the merchants we work with. Laws and regulations in the United States and around the world restrict how personal information is collected, processed, stored, transferred. used and disclosed, as well as set standards for its security, implement notice requirements regarding privacy practices, and provide individuals with certain rights regarding the use, disclosure and sale of their protected personal information. Several foreign jurisdictions, including the EU and the United Kingdom, have laws and regulations which are more restrictive in certain respects than those in the United States. For example, the EU General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which came into force on May 25, 2018, implemented stringent operational requirements for the use of personal data. The European regime also includes directives which, among other things, require EU member states to regulate marketing by electronic means and the use of web cookies and other tracking technology. Each EU member state has transposed the requirements of these directives into its own national data privacy regime, and therefore the laws may differ between jurisdictions. These are also under reform and are expected to be replaced by a regulation which should provide consistent requirements across the EU.

The GDPR introduced more stringent requirements (which will continue to be interpreted through guidance and decisions over the coming years) and require organizations to erase an individual’s information upon request, implement mandatory data breach notification requirements, additional new obligations on service providers and strict protections on how data may be transferred outside of the EEA. Recent legal developments in Europe have created complexity and uncertainty regarding transfers of personal data from the EEA to the United States. Most recently, on July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the EU invalidated Decision 2016/1250 on the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and cast doubt on the use of the standard contractual clauses.

~~We have previously relied on our own Privacy Shield certification and our relevant customers’ and partners’ Privacy Shield certifications~~ for the purposes of transferring personal data from the EEA to the U.S. in compliance with the GDPR’s data export conditions. These recent developments will require us to review and amend the legal mechanisms by which we make and/ or receive personal data transfers to/ in the U.S., including updating agreements to put in place standard contractual clauses. As supervisory authorities issue further guidance on personal data export mechanisms, including circumstances where the standard contractual clauses cannot be used, and/or start taking enforcement action or block personal data transfers to or from a particular jurisdiction, we could suffer additional costs, complaints and/or regulatory investigations or fines, reputational harm and/or if we are otherwise unable to transfer personal data between and among countries and regions in which we operate, it could affect the manner in which we provide our services, the geographical location or segregation of our relevant systems and operations, and could adversely affect our financial results.

~~In addition, the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union means that, following the expiration of the transition period at the end of~~ 2020 (unless further extended), we may also need to comply with the UK GDPR (in addition to the EU GDPR) and the United Kingdom will become a “third country” for the purposes of data transfers under the GDPR. These changes may require us to find alternative solutions for the compliant transfer of personal data into (and possibly from) the United Kingdom.

In the United States, both the federal and various state governments have adopted or are considering, laws, guidelines or rules for the collection, distribution, use and storage of information collected from or about consumers or their devices. For example, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which became enforceable by the California Attorney General on July 1, 2020, and requires new disclosures to California consumers, imposes new rules for collecting or using information about minors, and affords consumers new abilities to opt out of certain disclosures of personal information. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. The effects of the CCPA, forthcoming implementing regulations, and uncertainties about the scope and applicability of exemptions that may apply to our business, are potentially significant and may require us to modify our data collection or processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply.

~~Table of Contents~~

Restrictions on the collection, use, sharing or disclosure of personally identifiable information or additional requirements and liability for security and data integrity could require us to modify our solutions and features, possibly in a material manner, could limit our ability to develop new services and features and could subject us to increased compliance obligations and regulatory scrutiny. Non-compliance with data protection and privacy requirements may result in regulatory fines (which for certain breaches of the GDPR are up to the greater of 20 million Euros or 4 % of total global annual turnover), regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders to cease/ change our processing of our data, enforcement notices, and/ or assessment notices (for a compulsory audit). We may also face civil claims including representative actions and other class action type litigation (where individuals have suffered harm), potentially amounting to significant compensation or damages liabilities, as well as associated costs, diversion of internal resources, and reputational harm.

Our inability to protect our systems and data from continually evolving cybersecurity risks, security breaches or other technological risks could affect our reputation among our merchants and consumers and may expose us to liability.

We are subject to a number of legal requirements, contractual obligations and industry standards regarding security, data protection and privacy and any failure to comply with these requirements, obligations or standards could have an adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results.

In conducting our business, we process, transmit and store sensitive business information and personally identifiable information about our merchants, consumers, sales and financial institution partners, vendors, and other parties. This information may include account access credentials, credit and debit card numbers, bank account numbers, social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, names and addresses and other types of sensitive business or personal information. Some of this information is also processed and stored by our merchants, software and financial institution partners, third-party service providers to whom we outsource certain functions and other agents, which we refer to collectively as our associated third parties. We have certain responsibilities to payment networks and their member financial institutions for any failure, including the failure of our associated third parties, to protect this information.

In addition, as a provider of security-related solutions to merchants and other business customers, our products and services may themselves be targets of cyber-attacks that attempt to sabotage or otherwise disable them, or the defensive and preventative measures we take ultimately may not be able to effectively detect, prevent, or protect against or otherwise mitigate losses from all cyber-attacks. Despite significant efforts to create security barriers against such threats, it is virtually impossible for us to eliminate these risks entirely. Any such breach could compromise our networks, creating system disruptions or slowdowns and exploiting security vulnerabilities of our products. Additionally, the information stored on our networks could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen, which could subject us to liability and cause us financial harm. These breaches, or any perceived breach, may also result in damage to our reputation, negative publicity, loss of key partners, merchants and sales, increased costs to remedy any problem, and costly litigation, and may therefore adversely impact market acceptance of our products and seriously affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We have previously been the target of malicious third-party attempts to identify and exploit system vulnerabilities, and/or penetrate or bypass our security measures, in order to gain unauthorized access to our networks and systems or those of third parties associated with us. If these attempts are successful it could lead to the compromise of sensitive, business, personal or confidential information. While we proactively employ multiple methods at different layers of our systems to defend against intrusion and attack and to protect our data, we cannot be certain that these measures or sufficient to counter all current and emerging technology threats.

Our computer systems and the computer systems of our merchants and software partners have been, and could be in the future, subject to breaches, and our data protection measures may not prevent unauthorized access. While we believe the procedures and processes we have implemented to handle an attack are adequate, the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and are often difficult to detect. In addition, increased remote operations creates an additional risk of attack while decreasing our ability to monitor. Threats to our systems and associated third party systems can originate from human error, fraud or malice on the part of employees or third parties, or simply from accidental technological failure. Computer viruses and other malware can be distributed and could infiltrate our systems or those of associated third parties. In addition, denial of service or other attacks could be launched against us for a variety of purposes, including to interfere with our services or create a diversion for other malicious activities. Our defensive measures may not prevent unplanned downtime, unauthorized access or unauthorized use of sensitive data. While we maintain cyber errors and omissions insurance coverage that covers certain aspects of cyber risks, our insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses. Further, while we select our associated third parties carefully, we do not control their actions. Any problems experienced by these third parties, including those resulting from breakdowns or other disruptions in the services provided by such parties or cyber-attacks and security breaches, could adversely affect our ability to service our merchants or otherwise conduct our business.

We could also be subject to liability for claims relating to misuse of personal information, such as unauthorized marketing purposes and violation of consumer protection or data privacy laws. We cannot provide assurance that the contractual requirements related to security and privacy that we impose on our service providers who have access to merchant and consumer data will be followed or will be adequate to prevent the unauthorized use or disclosure of data. In addition, we have agreed in certain agreements to take certain protective measures to ensure the confidentiality of merchant and consumer data. The costs of systems and procedures associated with such protective measures may increase and could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. Any failure to adequately enforce or provide these protective measures could result in liability, protracted and costly litigation, governmental and card network intervention and fines and, with respect to misuse of personal information of our merchants and consumers, lost revenue and reputational harm.

~~Table of Contents~~

Any type of security breach, attack or misuse of data, whether experienced by us or an associated third party, could harm our reputation or deter existing or prospective merchants from using our services, increase our operating expenses in order to contain and remediate the incident, expose us to unbudgeted or uninsured liability, disrupt our operations (including potential service interruptions), divert management focus away from other priorities, increase our risk of regulatory scrutiny, result in the imposition of penalties and fines under state, federal and foreign laws or by payment networks and adversely affect our continued payment network registration and financial institution sponsorship. As set out above, fines under the GDPR, including for inadequate security, can reach €20 million or up to 4% of the total worldwide annual group turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Further, if we were to be removed from networks’ lists of Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, compliant service providers, our existing merchants, sales and financial institution partners or other third parties may cease using or referring our services. Also, prospective merchants, sales partners, financial institution partners or other third parties may choose to terminate their relationship with us, or delay or choose not to consider us for their processing needs, and the payment networks on which we rely could refuse to allow us to continue processing through their networks.

~~We may experience failures in our processing systems due to software defects, computer viruses and development delays, which could damage customer relations and expose us to liability.~~

Our core business depends heavily on the reliability of our processing systems, including the security of the applications and systems we develop and license to our customers, in addition to the security of the processing system of our sponsor bank. Software defects or vulnerabilities, a system outage, or other failures could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, including by damaging our reputation or exposing us to third-party liability. Payment network rules and certain governmental regulations allow for possible penalties if our products and services do not meet certain operating standards. To successfully operate our business, we must be able to protect our systems from interruption, including from events that may be beyond our control. Events that could cause system interruptions include fire, natural disaster, unauthorized entry, power loss, telecommunications failure, computer viruses, terrorist acts and war. Although we have taken steps to protect against data loss and system failures, we still face the risk that we may lose critical data or experience system failures. To help protect against these events, we perform a portion of disaster recovery operations ourselves, as well as utilize select third parties for certain operations. To the extent we outsource any disaster recovery functions, we are at risk of the merchant’s unresponsiveness or other failures in the event of breakdowns in our systems. In addition, our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses or failures that may occur.

Our products and services are based on sophisticated software and computing systems that are constantly evolving. We often encounter delays and cost overruns in developing changes implemented to our systems. In addition, the underlying software may contain undetected errors, viruses or defects. Defects in our software products and errors or delays in our processing of electronic transactions could result in additional development costs, diversion of technical and other resources from our other development efforts, loss of credibility with current or potential merchants, harm to our reputation or exposure to liability claims. In addition, we rely on technologies supplied to us by third parties that may also contain undetected errors, viruses or defects that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Although we attempt to limit our potential liability for warranty claims through disclaimers in our software documentation and limitation of liability provisions in our licenses and other agreements with our merchants and software partners, we cannot assure that these measures will be successful in limiting our liability. Additionally, we and our merchants and software partners are subject to payment network rules. If we do not comply with payment network requirements or standards, we may be subject to fines or sanctions, including suspension or termination of our registrations and licenses necessary to conduct business. We have experienced high growth rates in payment transaction volumes over the past years and expect growth to continue for the coming years; however, despite the implementation of architectural changes to safeguard sufficient future processing capacity on our payments platform, in the future the payments platform could potentially reach the limits of the number of transactions it is able to process, resulting in longer processing time or even downtime. Our efforts to safeguard sufficient future processing capacity are time-consuming, involve significant technical risk and may divert our resources from new features and products, and there can be no guarantee that these efforts will succeed. Furthermore, any efforts to further scale the platform or increase its complexity to handle a larger number or more complicated transactions could result in performance issues, including downtime. A failure to adequately scale our payments platform could therefore materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Degradation of the quality of the products and services we offer, including support services, could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain merchants and software partners.~~

Our merchants and software partners expect a consistent level of quality in the provision of our products and services. The support services we provide are a key element of the value proposition to our merchants and software partners. If the reliability or functionality of our products and services is compromised or the quality of those products or services is otherwise degraded, or if we fail to continue to provide a high level of support, we could lose existing merchants and software partners and find it harder to attract new merchants and software partners. If we are unable to scale our support functions to address the growth of our merchant and partner network, or our employees in alternative work locations are unable to adequately support customers, the quality of our support may decrease, which could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain merchants and software partners.

A significant natural disaster could have a material and adverse effect on our business. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster or other unanticipated problems at our headquarters or data centers could result in lengthy interruptions in access to or functionality of our platform or could result in related liabilities.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Increased customer attrition could cause our financial results to decline.~~

We experience attrition in customer credit and debit card processing volume resulting from several factors, including business closures, transfers of merchants’ accounts to our competitors, unsuccessful contract renewal negotiations and account closures that we initiate for various reasons, such as heightened credit risks, unacceptable card types or businesses, or contract breaches by customers. In addition, if a software partner switches to another payment processor, terminates our services, internalizes payment processing functions that we perform, merges with or is acquired by one of our competitors, or shuts down or becomes insolvent, we may no longer receive new merchant referrals from the software partner, and we risk losing existing merchants that were originally enrolled by the software partner. We cannot predict the level of attrition in the future and it could increase. Our software partners, most of which are not exclusive, are an important source of new business. Higher than expected attrition could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. If we are unable to renew our customer contracts on favorable terms, or at all, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

~~Fraud by merchants or others could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.~~

We may be liable for certain fraudulent transactions or credits initiated by merchants or others. Examples of merchant fraud include merchants or other parties knowingly using a stolen or counterfeit credit, debit or prepaid card, card number, or other credentials to record a false sales or credit transaction, processing an invalid card or intentionally failing to deliver the merchandise or services sold in an otherwise valid transaction. Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as counterfeiting and fraud. Failure to effectively manage risk and prevent fraud could increase our chargeback liability or cause us to incur other liabilities. It is possible that incidents of fraud could increase in the future. Increases in chargebacks or other liabilities could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Our ability to recruit, retain and develop qualified personnel is critical to our success and growth.~~

All of our businesses function at the intersection of rapidly changing technological, social, economic and regulatory environments that require a wide range of expertise and intellectual capital. For us to successfully compete and grow, we must recruit, retain and develop personnel who can provide the necessary expertise across a broad spectrum of intellectual capital needs. In addition, we must develop, maintain and, as necessary, implement appropriate succession plans to assure we have the necessary human resources capable of maintaining continuity in our business. For instance, we are highly dependent on the expertise of our Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Jared Isaacman. The market for qualified personnel is competitive and we may not succeed in recruiting additional personnel or may fail to effectively replace current personnel who depart with qualified or effective successors. In addition, from time to time, there may be changes in our management team that may be disruptive to our business. If our management team, including any new hires that we make, fails to work together effectively and to execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business could be harmed. Our effort to retain and develop personnel may also result in significant additional expenses, which could adversely affect our profitability. We cannot assure that key personnel, including our executive officers, will continue to be employed or that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. Failure to recruit, retain or develop qualified personnel could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We incur chargeback liability when our merchants refuse to or cannot reimburse chargebacks resolved in favor of their customers. Any increase in chargebacks not paid by our merchants may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In the event a dispute between a cardholder and a merchant is not resolved in favor of the merchant, the transaction is normally charged back to the merchant and the purchase price is credited or otherwise refunded to the cardholder. If we are unable to collect such amounts from the merchant’s account or reserve account, if applicable, or if the merchant refuses or is unable, due to closure, bankruptcy or other reasons, to reimburse us for a chargeback, we are responsible for the amount of the refund paid to the cardholder. The risk of chargebacks is typically greater with those merchants that promise future delivery of goods and services rather than delivering goods or rendering services at the time of payment (for example in the hospitality and auto rental industries, both of which we support), as well as “card not present” transactions in which consumers do not physically present cards to merchants in connection with the ~~purchase of goods and services, such as ecommerce, telephonic and mobile transactions. We may experience significant losses from chargebacks~~acquisition, in the future. Any increase in chargebacks not paid by our merchants could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We have policies and procedures to monitor and manage merchant-related credit risks and often mitigate such risks by requiring collateral, such as cash reserves, and monitoring transaction activity. Notwithstanding our policies and procedures for managing credit risk, it is possible that a default on such obligations by one or more of our merchants could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We expend significant resources pursuing sales opportunities, and if we fail to close sales after expending significant time and resources to do so, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The initial installation and set-up of many of our services often involve significant resource commitments by our merchants, particularly those with larger operational scale. Potential merchants generally commit significant resources to an evaluation of available services and may require us to expend substantial time, effort and money educating them as to the value of our services. We incur substantial costs in order to obtain each new customer. We may expend significant funds and management resources during a sales cycle and ultimately fail to close the sale. Our sales cycle may be extended due to our merchants’ budgetary constraints or for other reasons. If we are unsuccessful in closing sales after expending significant funds and management resources or we experience delays or experience greater than anticipated costs, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~There may be a decline in the use of cards as a payment mechanism for consumers or adverse developments with respect to the card industry in general.~~

If consumers do not continue to use credit or debit cards as a payment mechanism for their transactions, if there continues to be a reduction in “card present” transactions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, or if there is a change in the mix of payments between cash, credit cards and debit cards and other emerging means of payment, our business could be adversely affected. Consumer credit risk may make it more difficult or expensive for consumers to gain access to credit facilities such as credit cards. Regulatory changes may result in financial institutions seeking to charge their customers additional fees for use of credit or debit cards. Such fees may result in decreased use of credit or debit cards by cardholders. In order to consistently increase and maintain our profitability, consumers and businesses must continue to use electronic payment methods that we process, including credit and debit cards. If consumers and businesses do not continue to use credit, debit or prepaid cards as a payment mechanism for their transactions or if there is a change in the mix of payments between cash, alternative currencies and technologies, credit, debit and prepaid cards, or the corresponding methodologies used for each, which is adverse to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~Increases in card network fees and other changes to fee arrangements may result in the loss of merchants or a reduction in our earnings.~~

From time to time, card networks, including Visa and Mastercard, increase the fees that they charge processors. We could attempt to pass these increases along to our merchants, but this strategy might result in the loss of merchants to our competitors who do not pass along the increases. If competitive practices prevent us from passing along the higher fees to our merchants in the future, we may have to absorb all or a portion of such increases, which may increase our operating costs and reduce our earnings. In addition, regulators are subjecting interchange and other fees to increased scrutiny, and new regulations could require greater pricing transparency of the breakdown in fees or fee limitations, which could lead to increased price-based competition, lower margins and higher rates of merchant attrition and affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In addition, in certain of our markets, card issuers pay merchant acquirers such as us fees based on debit card usage in an effort to encourage debit card use. If these card issuers discontinue this practice, our revenue and margins in these jurisdictions could be adversely affected.

If we fail to comply with the applicable requirements of payment networks, they could seek to fine us, suspend us or terminate our registrations. If our merchants or sales partners incur fines or penalties that we cannot collect from them, we may have to bear the cost of such fines or penalties.

In order to provide our transaction processing services, several of our subsidiaries are registered with Visa and Mastercard and other payment networks as members or as service providers for members. Visa, Mastercard, and other payment networks, set the rules and standards with which we must comply. The termination of our member registration or our status as a certified service provider, or any changes in network rules or standards, including interpretation and implementation of the rules or standards, that increase the cost of doing business or limit our ability to provide transaction processing services to or through our merchants or partners, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

As such, we and our merchants are subject to payment network rules that could subject us or our merchants to a variety of fines or penalties that may be levied by such networks for certain acts or omissions by us or our merchants. The rules of card networks are set by their boards, which may be influenced by card issuers, and some of those issuers are our competitors with respect to these processing services. Many banks directly or indirectly sell processing services to merchants in direct competition with us. These banks could attempt, by virtue of their influence on the networks, to alter the networks’ rules or policies to the detriment of non-members including certain of our businesses. The termination of our registrations or our status as a service provider or a merchant processor, or any changes in network rules or standards, including interpretation and implementation of the rules or standards, that increase the cost of doing business or limit our ability to provide transaction processing services to our merchants, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. If a merchant fails to comply with the applicable requirements of card networks, it could be subject to a variety of fines or penalties that may be levied by card networks. If we cannot collect the amounts from the applicable merchant, we may have to bear the cost of the fines or penalties, resulting in lower earnings for us. The termination of our registration, or any changes in card network rules that would impair our registration, could require us to stop providing payment processing services relating to the affected card network, which would adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

Many of our key components are procured from a single or limited number of suppliers. Thus, we are at risk of shortage, price increases, tariffs, changes, delay, or discontinuation of key components, which could disrupt and materially and adversely affect our business.

Many of the key components used to manufacture our products, such as our POS systems, come from limited or single sources of supply. In addition, in some cases, we rely only on one manufacturer to fabricate, test, and assemble our products. In general, our contract manufacturers fabricate or procure components on our behalf, subject to certain approved procedures or supplier lists, and we do not have firm commitments from all of these manufacturers to provide all components, or to provide them in quantities and on timelines that we may require.

Due to our reliance on the components and products produced by suppliers such as these, we are subject to the risk of shortages and long lead times in the supply of certain components or products. We are still in the process of identifying alternative manufacturers for the assembly of our products and for many of the single-sourced components used in our products. In the case of off-the-shelf components, we are subject to

~~Table of Contents~~

the risk that our suppliers may discontinue or modify them, or that the components may cease to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, component shortages or delays or other problems in product assembly, and the availability of these components or products may be difficult to predict. For example, our manufacturers may experience temporary or permanent disruptions in their manufacturing operations due to equipment breakdowns, labor strikes or shortages, natural disasters, component or material shortages, cost increases, acquisitions, insolvency, changes in legal or regulatory requirements, or other similar problems.

Additionally, various sources of supply-chain risk, including strikes or shutdowns at delivery ports or loss of or damage to our products while they are in transit or storage, intellectual property theft, losses due to tampering, issues with quality or sourcing control, failure by our suppliers to comply with applicable laws and regulation, potential tariffs or other trade restrictions, or other similar problems could limit or delay the supply of our products or harm our reputation. In the event of a shortage or supply interruption from suppliers of these components, we may not be able to develop alternate sources quickly, cost-effectively, or at all. Any interruption or delay in manufacturing or component supply, any increases in component costs, or the inability to obtain these parts or components from alternate sources at acceptable prices and within a reasonable amount of time, would harm our ability to provide our products to sellers on a timely basis. This could harm our relationships with our sellers, prevent us from acquiring new sellers, and materially and adversely affect our business.

~~Cost savings initiatives may not produce the savings expected and may negatively impact our other initiatives and efforts to grow our business.~~

We are consistently exploring measures aimed at improving our profitability and maintaining flexibility in our capital resources, including the introduction of cost savings initiatives. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we furloughed approximately 25% of our employees, accelerated expense reduction plans related to previous acquisitions, limited discretionary spending, re-prioritized our capital projects, instituted a company-wide hiring freeze and reduced salaries for management. As ofthree months ended September 30, 2020, substantially all of furloughed employees were reinstated (with additional hiring in certain areas to accommodate new merchant onboarding), the hiring freeze was lifted and management salary reductions were partially reinstated. We expect to continue to take measures to improve our profitability and cash flows from operating activities. However, there can be no assurance that the cost control measures will be successful. In addition, these and any future spending reductions, if any, may negatively impact our other initiatives or our efforts to grow our business, which may negatively impact our future results of operations and increase the burden on existing management, systems, and resources.

Our operating results and operating metrics are subject to seasonality and volatility, which could result in fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and operating results or in perceptions of our business prospects.

We have experienced in the past, and expect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in our revenue, which can vary by region. For instance, our revenue has historically been strongest in our second and third quarters and weakest in our first quarter. Some variability results from seasonal retail events and the number of business days in a month or quarter. We also experience volatility in certain other metrics, such as number of transactions processed and payment processing volumes. Volatility in our key operating metrics or their rates of growth could result in fluctuations in financial condition or results of operations and may lead to adverse inferences about our prospects, which could result in declines in our stock price.

~~Financial risks~~

Our balance sheet includes significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment of a significant portion of these assets would negatively affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

As a result of our prior acquisitions, a significant portion of our total assets consists of intangible assets (including goodwill). Goodwill and intangible assets, net of amortization, together accounted for approximately 54% and 81% of the total assets on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. To the extent2021, we engage in additional acquisitions we may recognize additional intangible assets and goodwill. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually at October 1 and whenever events or circumstances make it more likely than not that impairment may have occurred. Under current accounting rules, any determination that impairment has occurred would require us to record an impairment charge, which would adversely affect our earnings. An impairment of a significant portion of goodwill or intangible assets could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate debt and prevent us from meeting our debt obligations.

We have substantial indebtedness. As of September 30, 2020, we had approximately $450.0 million of total debt outstanding under our Credit Facilities. Our substantial indebtedness could have adverse consequences, including:

~~increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments;~~

•

requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payments on our indebtedness, reducing our ability to use cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;

~~Table of Contents~~

•

making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, which could result in an event of default under the agreements governing such indebtedness;

~~restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make nonstrategic divestitures;~~

~~making it more difficult for us to obtain network sponsorship and clearing services from financial institutions or to obtain or retain other business with financial institutions;~~

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions, and general corporate or other purposes; and

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who are less highly leveraged and who, therefore, may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us from exploiting.

Successful execution of our business strategy is dependent in part upon our ability to manage our capital structure to reduce interest expense and enhance free cash flow generation. As of September 30, 2020, we had $450.0 million outstanding under the First Lien Term Loan Facility. The Second Lien Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility were fully repaid in the second quarter of 2020. The Revolving Credit Facility had remaining capacity of $89.5 million as of September 30, 2020, net of a $0.5 million letter of credit. We may not be able to refinance our Credit Facilities or our other existing indebtedness at or prior to their maturity at attractive rates of interest because of our high levels of debt, debt incurrence restrictions under our debt agreements or because of adverse conditions in credit markets generally.

In addition, $450.0 million of our debt outstanding at September 30, 2020 is at a variable rate of interest and is not subject to an interest rate hedge. The condition of the financial and credit markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. In addition, developments in our business and operations could lead to a ratings downgrade for us or our subsidiaries. As a result, as of September 30, 2020, the impact of a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $4.5 million.

Any such fluctuation in the financial and credit markets, or in the rating of us or our subsidiaries, may impact our ability to access debt markets in the future or increase our cost of current or future debt, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Restrictions imposed by our Credit Facilities and our other outstanding indebtedness may materially limit our ability to operate our business and finance our future operations or capital needs.~~

The terms of our Credit Facilities restrict us and our restricted subsidiaries, which currently includes all of our operating subsidiaries, from engaging in specified types of transactions. These covenants restrict our ability, and that of our restricted subsidiaries, to, among other things:

~~incur indebtedness;~~

~~create liens;~~

~~engage in mergers or consolidations;~~

~~make investments, loans and advances;~~

~~pay dividends and distributions and repurchase capital stock;~~

~~sell assets;~~

~~engage in certain transactions with affiliates;~~

~~enter into sale and leaseback transactions;~~

~~make certain accounting changes; and~~

~~make prepayments on junior indebtedness.~~

In addition, the credit agreements governing our Credit Facilities contain a springing maximum total leverage ratio financial covenant and customary financial covenants based on various leverage and interest coverage ratios. A breach of any of these covenants, or any other covenant in the documents governing our Credit Facilities, could result in a default or event of default under our Credit Facilities. In the event of any event of default under our Credit Facilities, the applicable lenders or agents could elect to terminate borrowing commitments and declare all borrowings and loans outstanding thereunder, together with accrued and unpaid interest and any fees and other obligations, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, or in the alternative, the applicable lenders or agents could exercise their rights under the security documents entered into in connection with our Credit Facilities. We have pledged substantially all of our assets as collateral securing our Credit Facilities and any such exercise of remedies on any material portion of such collateral would likely materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

If we were unable to repay or otherwise refinance these borrowings and loans when due, and the applicable lenders proceeded against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness, we may be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. In the event the applicable lenders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay that indebtedness. Any acceleration of amounts due under our Credit Facilities or other outstanding indebtedness would also likely have a material adverse effect on us.

Accelerated funding programs increase our working capital requirements and expose us to incremental credit risk, and if we are unable to access or raise sufficient liquidity to address these funding programs we may be exposed to additional competitive risk.

In response to demand from our merchants and competitive offerings, we offer certain of our merchants various accelerated funding programs, which are designed to enable qualified participating merchants to receive their deposits from credit card transactions in an expedited manner. These programs increase our working capital requirements and expose us to incremental credit risk related to our merchants, which could constrain our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and adversely affect our growth, financial condition and results of operations. Our inability to access or raise sufficient liquidity to address our needs in connection with the anticipated expansion of such advance funding programs could put us at a competitive disadvantage by restricting our ability to offer programs to all of our merchants similar to those made available by various of our competitors.

~~Our results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.~~

Revenue and profit generated by our non-U.S. operations will increase or decrease compared to prior periods as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, we may become subject to exchange control regulations that restrict or prohibit the conversion of our other revenue currencies into U.S. dollars. Any of these factors could decrease the value of revenues and earnings we derive from our non-U.S. operations and adversely affect our business.

While we currently have limited diversification in foreign currency, we may seek to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates through the use of hedging arrangements. To the extent that we hedge our foreign currency exchange rate exposure, we forgo the benefits we would otherwise experience if foreign currency exchange rates changed in our favor. No strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with such fluctuations and our currency exchange rate risk management activities could expose us to substantial losses if such rates move materially differently from our expectations.

New or revised tax regulations or their interpretations, or becoming subject to additional foreign or U.S. federal, state or local taxes that cannot be passed through to our merchants or partners, could reduce our net income.

We are subject to tax laws in each jurisdiction where we do business. Changes in tax laws or their interpretations could decrease the amount of revenues we receive, the value of any tax loss carry-forwards and tax credits recorded on our balance sheet and the amount of our cash flow, and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Additionally, companies in the electronic payments industry, including us, may become subject to incremental taxation in various tax jurisdictions. Taxing jurisdictions have not yet adopted uniform positions on this topic. If we are required to pay additional taxes and are unable to pass the tax expense through to our merchants, our costs would increase and our net income would be reduced.

~~If we cannot pass along increases in interchange and other fees from payment networks to our merchants, our operating margins would be reduced.~~

We pay interchange, assessment, transaction and other fees set by the payment networks to such networks and, in some cases, to the card issuing financial institutions for each transaction we process. From time to time, the payment networks increase the interchange fees and other fees that they charge payment processors and the financial institution sponsors. At their sole discretion, our financial institution sponsors have the right to pass any increases in interchange and other fees on to us and they have consistently done so in the past. We are generally permitted under the contracts into which we enter, and in the past we have been able to, pass these fee increases along to our merchants through corresponding increases in our processing fees. However, if we are unable to pass through these and other fees in the future, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~Legal and regulatory risks~~

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, anti-money laundering, economic and trade sanctions regulations, and similar laws could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.

We may operate our business in foreign countries where companies often engage in business practices that are prohibited by U.S. and other regulations applicable to us. We are subject to anti-corruption laws and regulations, including the FCPA and other laws that prohibit the making or offering of improper payments to foreign government officials and political figures, including anti-bribery provisions enforced by the Department of Justice and accounting provisions enforced by the SEC. These laws prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by the United States and other business entities for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have implemented policies, procedures, systems, and controls designed to identify and address potentially impermissible

~~Table of Contents~~

transactions under such laws and regulations; however, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, consultants and agents, including those that may be based in or from countries where practices that violate U.S. or other laws may be customary, will not take actions in violation of our policies, for which we may be ultimately responsible.

In addition, we are contractually required to comply with anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, or the BSA. Among other things, the BSA requires subject entities to develop and implement risk-based anti-money laundering programs, report large cash transactions and suspicious activity, and maintain transaction records.

We are also subject to certain economic and trade sanctions programs that are administered by the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, which prohibit or restrict transactions to or from or dealings with specified countries, their governments, and in certain circumstances, their nationals, and with individuals and entities that are specially-designated nationals of those countries, narcotics traffickers, and terrorists or terrorist organizations. Other entities may be subject to additional foreign or local sanctions requirements in other relevant jurisdictions.

Similar anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing and proceeds of crime laws apply to movements of currency and payments through electronic transactions and to dealings with persons specified in lists maintained by the country equivalents to OFAC lists in several other countries and require specific data retention obligations to be observed by intermediaries in the payment process. Our businesses in those jurisdictions are subject to those data retention obligations.

Failure to comply with any of these laws and regulations or changes in this regulatory environment, including changing interpretations and the implementation of new or varying regulatory requirements by the government, may result in significant financial penalties, reputational harm or change the manner in which we currently conduct some aspects of our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Failure to protect, enforce and defend our intellectual property rights may diminish our competitive advantages or interfere with our ability to market and promote our products and services.~~

Our trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, patents, know-how, proprietary technology and other intellectual property are important to our future success. We believe our trademarks and trade names are widely recognized and associated with quality and reliable service. While it is our policy to protect and defend our intellectual property rights vigorously, we cannot predict whether the steps we take to protect our intellectual property will be adequate to prevent infringement, misappropriation, dilution or other potential violations of our intellectual property rights. We also cannot guarantee that others will not independently develop technology with the same or similar functions to any proprietary technology we rely on to conduct our business and differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or obtain and use our technology to develop applications with the same functionality as our solutions, and policing unauthorized use of our technology and intellectual property rights is difficult and may not be effective. Furthermore, we may face claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights that could interfere with our ability to market and promote our brands, products and services. Any litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights or defend ourselves against claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights could be costly, divert attention of management and may not ultimately be resolved in our favor. Moreover, if we are unable to successfully defend against claims that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others, we may be prevented from using certain intellectual property or may be liable for damages, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

While software and other of our proprietary works may be protected under copyright law, we have chosen not to register any copyrights in these works, and instead, primarily rely on protecting our software as a trade secret. In order to bring a copyright infringement lawsuit in the United States, the copyright must be registered with the United States Copyright Office. Accordingly, the remedies and damages available to us for unauthorized use of our software may be limited.

We attempt to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information by requiring all of our employees, consultants and certain of our contractors to execute confidentiality and invention assignment agreements. However, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances, and individuals with whom we have these agreements may not comply with their terms. The assignment of intellectual property rights under these agreements may not be self-executing or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property. In addition, we may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical know-how or other trade secrets by the parties to these agreements despite the existence generally of confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures is difficult and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary technologies will be effective.

In addition, we use open-source software in connection with our proprietary software and expect to continue to use open-source software in the future. Some open-source licenses require licensors to provide source code to licensees upon request, or prohibit licensors from charging a fee to licensees. While we try to insulate our proprietary code from the effects of such open-source license provisions, we cannot guarantee we will be successful. Accordingly, we may face claims from others claiming ownership of, or seeking to enforce the license terms applicable to such open-source software, including by demanding release of the open-source software, derivative works or our proprietary source code that was developed or distributed with such software. These claims could also result in litigation, require us to purchase a costly license or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change our software, any of which would have a negative effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, if the license terms for the open-source code change, we may be forced to re-engineer our software or incur additional costs.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our existing patents may not be valid, and we may not be able to obtain and enforce additional patents to protect our proprietary rights from use by potential competitors. Companies with other patents could require us to stop using or pay to use required technology.

We have applied for, and intend to continue to apply for, patents relating to our proprietary software and technology. Such applications may not result in the issuance of any patents, and any patents now held or that may be issued may not provide adequate protection from competition. Furthermore, because the issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, it is possible that patents issued or licensed to us may be challenged successfully and found to be invalid or unenforceable. In that event, any competitive advantage that such patents might provide would be lost. If we are unable to secure or to continue to maintain patent coverage, our technology could become subject to competition from the sale of similar competing products.

Competitors may also be able to design around our patents. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. If these developments were to occur, we could face increased competition. In addition, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patents on our software and technology in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States.

~~Failure to comply with, or changes in, laws, regulations and enforcement activities may adversely affect the products, services and markets in which we operate.~~

We, our merchants and certain third party partners are subject to laws, regulations and industry standards that affect the electronic payments industry in the many countries in which our services are used. In particular, certain merchants and software partners and our sponsor bank are subject to numerous laws and regulations applicable to banks, financial institutions, and card issuers in the United States and abroad, and, consequently, we are at times affected by these foreign, federal, state, and local laws and regulations. There may be changes to the laws, regulation and standards that affect our operations in substantial and unpredictable ways at the federal and state level in the United States and in other countries in which our services are used. Changes to laws, regulations and standards, including interpretation and enforcement of such laws, regulations and standards could increase the cost of doing business or otherwise change how or where we want to do business. In addition, changes to laws, regulations and standards could affect our merchants and software partners and could result in material effects on the way we operate or the cost to operate our business.

In addition, the U.S. government has increased its scrutiny of a number of credit card practices, from which some of our merchants derive significant revenue. Regulation of the payments industry, including regulations applicable to us, our merchants and software partners, has increased significantly in recent years. Failure to comply with laws and regulations applicable to our business may result in the suspension or revocation of licenses or registrations, the limitation, suspension or termination of services or the imposition of consent orders or civil and criminal penalties, including fines which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are also subject to U.S. financial services regulations, a myriad of consumer protection laws, including economic sanctions, laws and regulations, anticorruption laws, escheat regulations and privacy and information security regulations. Changes to legal rules and regulations, or interpretation or enforcement of them, could have a negative financial effect on us. Any lack of legal certainty exposes our operations to increased risks, including increased difficulty in enforcing our agreements in those jurisdictions and increased risks of adverse actions by local government authorities, such as expropriations. In addition, certain of our alliance partners are subject to regulation by federal and state authorities and, as a result, could pass through some of those compliance obligations to us, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

In particular, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, significantly changed the U.S. financial regulatory system. Among other things, Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, which regulates consumer financial products and services, including some offered by certain of our merchants. Regulation, examination and enforcement actions from the CFPB may require us to adjust our activities and may increase our compliance costs.

Separately, under the Dodd-Frank Act, debit interchange fees that a card issuer receives and which are established by a payment network for an electronic debit transaction are regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or the Federal Reserve, and must be “reasonable and proportional” to the cost incurred by the card issuer in authorizing, clearing, and settling the transaction. The Federal Reserve has capped debit interchange rates for card issuers operating in the United States with assets of $10 billion or more at the sum of $0.21 per transaction and an ~~ad valorem~~ component of 5 basis points to reflect a portion of the card issuer’s fraud losses plus, for qualifying card issuers, an additional $0.01 per transaction in debit interchange for fraud prevention costs. Regulations such as these could result in the need for us to make capital investments to modify our services to facilitate our existing merchants’ and potential merchants’ compliance and reduce the fees we are able to charge our merchants. These regulations also could result in greater pricing transparency and increased price-based competition leading to lower margins and higher rates of merchant attrition. Furthermore, the requirements of the regulations could result in changes in our merchants’ business practices, which could change the demand for our services and alter the type or volume of transactions that we process on behalf of our merchants.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Risks related to our organizational structure~~

Our principal asset is our interest in Shift4 Payments, LLC, and, as a result, we depend on distributions from Shift4 Payments, LLC to pay our taxes and expenses, including payments under the TRA. Shift4 Payments, LLC’s ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations and restrictions.

We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership of LLC Interests. As of September 30, 2020, we owned 55.6% of the economic interest in Shift4 Payments, LLC. As such, we have no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow, and our ability to pay our taxes and operating expenses or declare and pay dividends in the future, if any, are dependent upon the financial results and cash flows of Shift4 Payments, LLC and distributions we receive from Shift4 Payments, LLC. There can be no assurance that our subsidiaries will generate sufficient cash flow to distribute funds to us or that applicable state law and contractual restrictions, including negative covenants in our debt instruments, will permit such distributions. Although Shift4 Payments, LLC is not currently subject to any debt instruments or other agreements that would restrict its ability to make distributions to Shift4 Payments, Inc., the terms of our Credit Facilities and other outstanding indebtedness restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to Shift4 Payments, LLC.

Shift4 Payments, LLC reports as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, generally is not subject to any entity-level U.S. federal income tax. Instead, any taxable income of Shift4 Payments, LLC is allocated to holders of LLC Interests, including us. Accordingly, we incur income taxes on our allocable share of any net taxable income of Shift4 Payments, LLC. Under the terms of the Shift4 Payments LLC Agreement, Shift4 Payments, LLC is obligated to make tax distributions to holders of LLC Interests, including us. In addition to tax expenses, we also incur expenses related to our operations, including payments under the TRA, which we expect could be significant. We intend, as its managing member, to cause Shift4 Payments, LLC to make cash distributions to the owners of LLC Interests in an amount sufficient to (1) fund all or part of their tax obligations in respect of taxable income allocated to them and (2) cover our operating expenses, including payments under the TRA. However, Shift4 Payments, LLC’s ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations and restrictions, such as restrictions on distributions that would either violate any contract or agreement to which Shift4 Payments, LLC is then a party, including debt agreements, or any applicable law, or that would have the effect of rendering Shift4 Payments, LLC insolvent. If we do not have sufficient funds to pay tax or other liabilities or to fund our operations (including as a result of an acceleration of our obligations under the TRA), we may have to borrow funds, which could materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition and subject us to various restrictions imposed by any such lenders. To the extent that we are unable to make timely payments under the TRA for any reason, such payments generally will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid; provided, however, that nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a material breach of a material obligation under the TRA and therefore accelerate payments due under the TRA. In addition, if Shift4 Payments, LLC does not have sufficient funds to make distributions, our ability to declare and pay cash dividends will also be restricted or impaired. See “—Risks related to the ownership of our Class A common stock.”

Under the Shift4 Payments LLC Agreement, we expect Shift4 Payments, LLC, from time to time, to make distributions in cash to its equity holders, in amounts sufficient to cover the taxes on their allocable share of taxable income of Shift4 Payments, LLC. As a result of (i) potential differences in the amount of net taxable income indirectly allocable to us and to Shift4 Payments, LLC’s other equity holders, (ii) the lower tax rate applicable to corporations as opposed to individuals and (iii) the favorable tax benefits that we anticipate from (a) future purchases or redemptions of LLC Interests from the Continuing Equity Owners, (b) payments under the TRA and (c) the acquisition of interests in Shift4 Payments, LLC from its equity holders, we expect that these tax distributions may be in amounts that exceed our tax liabilities. Our board of directors will determine the appropriate uses for any excess cash so accumulated, which may include, among other uses, the payment of obligations under the TRA and the payment of other expenses. We have no obligation to distribute such cash (or other available cash) to our stockholders. No adjustments to the exchange ratio for LLC Interests and corresponding16,797 shares of Class A common stock will be made as a result of any cash distribution by us or any retention of cash by us. To the extent we do not distribute such excess cash as dividends on our Class A common stock or otherwise take ameliorative actions between LLC Interests and shares of Class A common stock and instead, for example, hold such cash balances, or lend them to Shift4 Payments, LLC, this may result in shares of our Class A common stock increasing in value relative to the value of LLC Interests. The holders of LLC Interests may benefit from any value attributable to such cash balances if they acquire shares of Class A common stock in exchange for their LLC Interests, notwithstanding that such holders may previously have participated as holders of LLC Interests in distributions that resulted in such excess cash balances.

The TRA with the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders requires us to make cash payments to them in respect of certain tax benefits to which we may become entitled, and we expect that the payments we are required to make will be substantial.

Under the TRA, we are required to make cash payments to the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders equal to 85% of the tax benefits, if any, that we actually realize, or in certain circumstances are deemed to realize, as a result of (1) the increases in our share of the tax basis of assets of Shift4 Payments, LLC resulting from any redemptions of LLC Interests from the Continuing Equity Owners, (2) our utilization of certain tax attributes of the Blocker Companies and (3) certain other tax benefits related to our making payments under the TRA. The payment obligations under the TRA are obligations of Shift4 Payments, Inc. and we expect that the amount of the cash payments that we are required to make under the TRA will be significant. Any payments made by us to the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders under the TRA will not be available for reinvestment in our business and will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to us. The payments under the TRA are not conditioned upon continued ownership of us by the exchanging Continuing Equity Owners. Furthermore, our future obligation to make payments under the TRA could make us a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of an acquirer that cannot use some or all of the tax benefits that are the subject of the TRA. The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of

~~Table of Contents~~

factors, including the timing of redemptions by the Continuing Equity Owners, the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the amount of gain recognized by such holders of LLC Interests, the amount and timing of the taxable income allocated to us or otherwise generated by us in the future, the portion of our payments under the TRA constituting imputed interest and the federal and state tax rates then applicable.

Our organizational structure, including the TRA, confers certain benefits upon the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders that will not benefit holders of our Class A common stock to the same extent that it will benefit the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders.

Our organizational structure, including the TRA, confers certain benefits upon the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders that will not benefit the holders of our Class A common stock to the same extent that it will benefit the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders. We entered into the TRA with Shift4 Payments, LLC, the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders in connection with the completion of the IPO, which provides for the payment by Shift4 Payments, Inc. to the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders of 85% of the amount of tax benefits, if any, that Shift4 Payments, Inc. actually realizes, or in some circumstances is deemed to realize, as a result of (1) the increases in the tax basis of assets of Shift4 Payments, LLC resulting from any redemptions of LLC Interests from the Continuing Equity Owners, (2) our utilization of certain tax attributes of the Blocker Companies and (3) certain other tax benefits related to our making payments under the TRA. Although Shift4 Payments, Inc. retains 15% of the amount of such tax benefits, this and other aspects of our organizational structure may adversely impact the future trading market for the Class A common stock.

In certain cases, payments under the TRA to the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders may be accelerated or significantly exceed any actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the TRA.

The TRA provides that upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control or if, at any time, we elect an early termination of the TRA, then our obligations, or our successor’s obligations, under the TRA to make payments would be based on certain assumptions, including an assumption that we would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize all potential future tax benefits that are subject to the TRA.

As a result of the foregoing, (1) we could be required to make payments under the TRA that are greater than the specified percentage of any actual benefits we ultimately realize in respect of the tax benefits that are subject to the TRA and (2) if we elect to terminate the TRA early, we would be required to make an immediate cash payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax benefits that are the subject of the TRA. The maximum TRA liability in the event of an early termination would be approximately $439.0 million, subject to the timing of such early termination, negotiation and certain assumptions, which payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization, if any, of such future tax benefits. In these situations, our obligations under the TRA could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control. There can be no assurance that we will be able to fund or finance our obligations under the TRA.

~~We will not be reimbursed for any payments made to the Continuing Equity Owners or the Blocker Shareholders under the TRA in the event that any tax benefits are disallowed.~~

Payments under the TRA will be based on the tax reporting positions that we determine, and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, or another tax authority may challenge all or part of the tax basis increases or other tax benefits we claim, as well as other related tax positions we take, and a court could sustain such challenge. If the outcome of any such challenge would reasonably be expected to materially affect a recipient’s payments under the TRA, then we will not be permitted to settle such challenge without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) of Searchlight and Rook. The interests of the Continuing Equity Owners and the Blocker Shareholders in any such challenge may differ from or conflict with our interests and your interests, and Searchlight and Rook may exercise their consent rights relating to any such challengeformer VenueNext owners, in a manner adverse to our interests and your interests. We will not be reimbursed for any cash payments previously made to the Continuing Equity Owners or the Blocker Shareholder under the TRA in the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by us and for which payment has been made to a Continuing Equity Owner or the Blocker Shareholder are subsequently challenged by a taxing authority and are ultimately disallowed. Instead, any excess cash payments made by us to a Continuing Equity Owner or the Blocker Shareholder will be netted against any future cash payments that we might otherwise be required to make to such Continuing Equity Owner or such Blocker Shareholder, as applicable, under the terms of the TRA. However, we might not determine that we have effectively made an excess cash payment to a Continuing Equity Owner or the Blocker Shareholder for a number of years following the initial time of such payment and, if any of our tax reporting positions are challenged by a taxing authority, we will not be permitted to reduce any future cash payments under the TRA until any such challenge is finally settled or determined. Moreover, the excess cash payments we previously made under the TRA could be greater than the amount of future cash payments against which we would otherwise be permitted to net such excess. As a result, payments could be made under the TRA significantly in excess of any tax savings that we realize in respect of the tax attributes with respect to a Continuing Equity Owner or the Blocker Shareholder that are the subject of the TRA.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Unanticipated changes in effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or other tax returns could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.~~

We are subject to taxes by the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax authorities. Our future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by a number of factors, including:

~~allocation of expenses to and among different jurisdictions;~~

~~changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;~~

~~expected timing and amount of the release of any tax valuation allowances;~~

~~tax effects of equity-based compensation;~~

~~costs related to intercompany restructurings;~~

~~changes in tax laws, tax treaties, regulations or interpretations thereof; or~~

~~lower than anticipated future earnings in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated future earnings in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory tax rates.~~

In addition, we may be subject to audits of our income, sales and other taxes by U.S. federal, state, and local and foreign taxing authorities. Outcomes from these audits could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

If we were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act, including as a result of our ownership of Shift4 Payments, LLC, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the 1940 Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if (1) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or (2) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We do not believe that we are an “investment company,” as such term is defined in either of those sections of the 1940 Act.

We and Shift4 Payments, LLC conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company. As the sole managing member of Shift4 Payments, LLC, we control and operate Shift4 Payments, LLC. On that basis, we believe that our interest in Shift4 Payments, LLC is not an “investment security” as that term is used in the 1940 Act. However, if we were to cease participation in the management of Shift4 Payments, LLC, or if Shift4 Payments, LLC itself becomes an investment company, our interest in Shift4 Payments, LLC could be deemed an “investment security” for purposes of the 1940 Act.

If it were established that we were an unregistered investment company, there would be a risk that we would be subject to monetary penalties and injunctive relief in an action brought by the SEC, that we would be unable to enforce contracts with third parties and that third parties could seek to obtain rescission of transactions undertaken during the period it was established that we were an unregistered investment company. If we were required to register as an investment company, restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on our capital structure and our ability to transact with affiliates, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

~~Risks related to the ownership of our Class A common stock~~

~~Searchlight and our Founder will have significant influence over us, including control over decisions that require the approval of stockholders.~~

As of September 30, 2020, Searchlight and our Founder control, in the aggregate, approximately 94.7% of the voting power represented by all our outstanding classes of stock. As a result, Searchlight and our Founder continue to exercise significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors and the size of our board, any amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws and any approval of significant corporate transactions (including a sale of substantially all of our assets), and continue to have significant control over our management and policies.

Our Founder, an affiliate of our Founder and affiliates of Searchlight are members of our board of directors. These board members are designees of Searchlight and our Founder and can take actions that have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of us or discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares, which could prevent stockholders from receiving a premium for their shares. These actions may be taken even if other stockholders oppose them. The concentration of voting power with Searchlight and our Founder may have an adverse effect on the price of our Class A common stock. The interests of Searchlight and our Founder may not be consistent with your interests as a stockholder.

~~Table of Contents~~

Searchlight and their respective affiliates engage in a broad spectrum of activities. In the ordinary course of their business activities, Searchlight and their respective affiliates may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our stockholders. Searchlight may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, Searchlight may have an interest in us pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to you.

The multiple class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting power with our Founder and Searchlight, which will limit your ability to influence the outcome of important transactions, including a change in control.

Our Class B common stock and Class C common stock each have ten votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. As of September 30, 2020, Jared Isaacman, our Founder, Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors controls approximately 56.0% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock; and Searchlight holds approximately 38.7% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Accordingly, our Founder and Searchlight together hold all of the issued and outstanding shares of our Class B common stock and Class C common stock and therefore, individually or together, are able to significantly influence matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other major corporate transactions. Our Founder and Searchlight, individually or together, may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests. This concentrated control may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control of our company, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their capital stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our Class A common stock. Future transfers by the holders of Class B common stock and Class C common stock will generally result in those shares converting into shares of Class A common stock, subject to limited exceptions.

~~We cannot predict the effect our multiple class structure may have on the market price of our Class A common stock.~~

We cannot predict whether our multiple class structure will result in a lower or more volatile market price of our Class A common stock, in adverse publicity, or other adverse consequences. For example, certain index providers have announced restrictions on including companies with multiple-class share structures in certain of their indices. In July 2017, FTSE Russell announced that it plans to require new constituents of its indices to have greater than 5% of the company’s voting rights in the hands of public stockholders, and S&P Dow Jones announced that it will no longer admit companies with multiple-class share structures to certain of its indices. Affected indices include the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, and S&P SmallCap 600, which together make up the S&P Composite 1500. Also in 2017, MSCI, a leading stock index provider, opened public consultations on their treatment of no-vote and multi-class structures and temporarily barred new multi-class listings from certain of its indices and in October 2018, MSCI announced its decision to include equity securities “with unequal voting structures” in its indices and to launch a new index that specifically includes voting rights in its eligibility criteria. Under such announced policies, the multiple class structure of our common stock would make us ineligible for inclusion in certain indices and, as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other investment vehicles that attempt to track those indices would not invest in our Class A common stock. These policies are relatively new and it is unclear what effect, if any, they will have on the valuations of publicly-traded companies excluded from such indices, but it is possible that they may depress valuations, as compared to similar companies that are included. Given the sustained flow of investment funds into passive strategies that seek to track certain indices, exclusion from certain stock indices would likely preclude investment by many of these funds and could make our Class A common stock less attractive to other investors. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE rules and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. You may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such corporate governance requirements.

Searchlight and our Founder have more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors, and, as a result, we are considered a “controlled company” for the purposes of the NYSE. As such, we qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements to have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors, an entirely independent nominating and corporate governance committee, an entirely independent compensation committee or to perform annual performance evaluations of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees.

The corporate governance requirements and specifically the independence standards are intended to ensure that directors who are considered independent are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. We currently utilize certain exemptions afforded to a “controlled company.” As a result, we are not subject to certain corporate governance requirements, including that a majority of our board of directors consists of “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of the NYSE. In addition, we are not required to have a nominating and corporate governance committee or compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities or to conduct annual performance evaluations of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees.

Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE. Our status as a controlled company could make our Class A common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Certain provisions of Delaware law and antitakeover provisions in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change of control.~~

Certain provisions of Delaware law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have an antitakeover effect and may delay, defer, or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, takeover attempt or other change of controlregistered transaction that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders. These provisions provide for, among other things:

~~a multi-class common stock structure;~~

~~a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms;~~

~~the ability of our board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock;~~

~~advance notice for nominations of directors by stockholders and for stockholders to include matters to be considered at our annual meetings;~~

~~certain limitations on convening special stockholder meetings;~~

~~prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors; and~~

~~the removal of directors only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the voting power represented by our then-outstanding common stock.~~

These antitakeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the third party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many of our stockholders. As a result, our stockholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.

In addition, we have opted out of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which we refer to as the DGCL, but our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder (any stockholder with 15% or more of our voting stock) for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder is prohibited, subject to certain exceptions.

The JOBS Act allows us to postpone the date by which we must comply with certain laws and regulations intended to protect investors and to reduce the amount of information we provide in our reports filed with the SEC. We cannot be certain if this reduced disclosure will make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.

The JOBS Act is intended to reduce the regulatory burden on “emerging growth companies.” As defined in the JOBS Act, a public company whose initial public offering of common equity securities occurs after December 8, 2011 and whose annual gross revenues are less than $1.07 billion will, in general, qualify as an “emerging growth company” until the earliest of:

~~the last day of its fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of its initial public offering of common equity securities;~~

~~the last day of its fiscal year in which it has annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more;~~

~~the date on which it has, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.07 billion in nonconvertible debt; and~~

•

the date on which it is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” which will occur at such time as the company (1) has an aggregate worldwide market value of common equity securities held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (2) has been required to file annual and quarterly reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, for a period of at least 12 months and (3) has filed at least one annual report pursuant to the Exchange Act.

Under this definition, we are an “emerging growth company” and could remain an “emerging growth company” until as late as the fifth anniversary of the completion of our IPO. For so long as we are an “emerging growth company,” we are, among other things:

~~not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;~~

~~not required to hold a nonbinding advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation~~ pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section ~~14A(a) of the Exchange Act;~~

~~not required to seek stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved pursuant to Section 14A(b) of the Exchange Act;~~

~~exempt from the requirement of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, regarding the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor’s report on the financial statements; and~~

~~subject to reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can use the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)~~4(a)(2)~~(B)~~ of the Securities Act of 1933, as ~~amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This permits an emerging growth company to delay the adoption~~amended.

The following is a list of ~~certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to use this extended transition period and,~~exhibits filed as a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of issuers who are required to comply with the effective dates for new or revised accounting standards that are applicable to public companies.

We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result of our decision to take advantage of some or all of the reduced disclosure requirements above. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Because we have no current plans to pay regular cash dividends on our Class A common stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your Class A common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We do not anticipate paying any regular cash dividends on our Class A common stock. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, general and economic conditions, our results of operations and financial condition, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions and such other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is, and may be, limited by covenants of existing and any future outstanding indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur, including under our Credit Facilities and indenture governing the Notes. Therefore, any return on investment in our Class A common stock is solely dependent upon the appreciation of the price of our Class A common stock on the open market, which may not occur.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, subject to limited exceptions, that unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any (1) derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of our Company, (2) action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer, or other employee or stockholder of our Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders, creditors or other constituents, (3) action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer of the Company arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or (4) action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer of the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine; provided that the exclusive forum provisions will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, or to any claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. For instance, the provision would not apply to actions arising under federal securities laws, including suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act, Exchange Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the forum provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of “corporate opportunity” will not apply against Searchlight, any of our directors who are employees of or affiliated with Searchlight, Rook, any of our directors who are employees of or affiliated with Rook, or any director or stockholder who is not employed by us or our subsidiaries.

The doctrine of corporate opportunity generally provides that a corporate fiduciary may not develop an opportunity using corporate resources, acquire an interest adverse to that of the corporation or acquire property that is reasonably incident to the present or prospective business of the corporation or in which the corporation has a present or expectancy interest, unless that opportunity is first presented to the corporation and the corporation chooses not to pursue that opportunity. The doctrine of corporate opportunity is intended to preclude officers or directors or other fiduciaries from personally benefiting from opportunities that belong to the corporation. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of “corporate opportunity” does not apply against Searchlight, any of our directors who are employees of or affiliated with Searchlight, Rook, any of our directors who are employees of or affiliated with Rook, or any director or stockholder who is not employed by us or our subsidiaries. Searchlight, any of our directors who are employees of or affiliated with Searchlight, Rook, any of our directors who are employees of or affiliated with Rook, or any director or stockholder who is not employed by us or our subsidiaries will therefore have no duty to communicate or present corporate opportunities to us, and have the right to either hold any corporate opportunity for their (and their

~~Table of Contents~~

affiliates’) own account and benefit or to recommend, assign or otherwise transfer such corporate opportunity to persons other than us, including to any director or stockholder who is not employed by us or our subsidiaries. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not renounce our interest in any business opportunity that is expressly offered to an employee director or employee in his or her capacity as a director or employee of Shift4 Payments, Inc.

As a result, certain of our stockholders, directors and their respective affiliates are not prohibited from operating or investing in competing businesses. We therefore may find ourselves in competition with certain of our stockholders, directors or their respective affiliates, and we may not have knowledge of, or be able to pursue, transactions that could potentially be beneficial to us. Accordingly, we may lose a corporate opportunity or suffer competitive harm, which could negatively impact our business or prospects.

We are subject to rules and regulations established from time to time by the SEC and the NYSE regarding our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, or report them in a timely manner.

We are subject to the rules and regulations established from time to time by the SEC and the NYSE. These rules and regulations require, among other things, that we establish and periodically evaluate procedures with respect to our internal control over financial reporting. Such reporting obligations place a considerable strain on our financial and management systems, processes and controls, as well as on our personnel.

In addition, we are required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act so that our management can certify as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting by the time our second annual report is filed with the SEC and thereafter, which will require us to document and make significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting. Likewise, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at such time as we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we become an accelerated or large accelerated filer although, as described above, we could potentially qualify as an “emerging growth company” until as late as the fifth anniversary of the completion of the IPO.

We expect to incur costs related to implementing an internal audit and compliance function in the upcoming years to further improve our internal control environment. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting or if we are unable to comply with the demands placed upon us as a public company, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in a timely manner, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by the SEC. We also could become subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. In addition, if we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, when required, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, we may face restricted access to the capital markets and our stock price may be adversely affected.

~~Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by us or our existing stockholders in the public market could cause the market price for our Class A common stock to decline.~~

The sale of shares of our Class A common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of our Class A common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.

As of November 3, 2020, we had outstanding a total of 30,023,096 shares of Class A common stock. Of the outstanding shares, all shares sold in the IPO and Follow-on Offering (totaling 28,750,000 shares of Class A common stock) are freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, other than any shares held by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act, whose sales would be subject to the Rule 144 resale restrictions, other than the holding period requirement. The remaining shares of Class A common stock are “restricted securities,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. These restricted securities are eligible for public sale only if they are registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 under the Securities Act.

In connection with the IPO, our directors and executive officers, and substantially all of our stockholders entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters for the IPO, or the IPO lock-up agreements, pursuant to which each of these persons or entities, subject to certain exceptions, for a period of 180 days after June 4, 2020, agreed that, without the prior written consent of any two of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, or collectively, the Lock-up Release Parties, they would not (1) offer, pledge, loan, announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common stock (including, without limitation, common stock or such other securities which may be deemed to be beneficially owned by such directors, executive officers, managers and members in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and securities which may be issued upon exercise of a stock option or warrant), or (2) enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the common stock or such other securities, whether any such transaction described in clause (1) or (2) above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise, or (3) make any demand for or exercise any right with respect to the registration of any shares of our common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our common stock.

~~Table of Contents~~

We, our officers and directors, the selling stockholders in the Follow-on Offering and the other Continuing Equity Owners have agreed that, without the prior written consent of any two of the Lock-up Release Parties, we and they will not, subject to certain exceptions, during the period ending 90 days after September 10, 2020 (1) offer, sell, contract to sell, loan, pledge, grant any option to purchase, make any short sale or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, loan, sale, pledge or disposition of any shares of our Class A common stock or Class C common stock, or any options or warrants to purchase any shares of our Class A common stock or Class C common stock, or any securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, shares of our Class A common stock or Class C common stock; or (2) enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, all or a portion of the economic consequences of ownership of our Class A common stock or Class C common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock or Class C common stock, whether any transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of our Class A common stock, Class C common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise.

Additionally, Rook has entered into a margin loan agreement pursuant to which it pledged LLC Interests and shares of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock (collectively, Rook Units) to secure a margin loan. If Rook were to default on its obligations under the margin loan and fail to cure such default, the lender would have the right to exchange and sell up to 7,035,422 Rook units to satisfy Rook’s obligation. Such an event could cause our stock price to decline.

In addition, any Class A common stock that we issue under the 2020 Incentive Award Plan, or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase our Class A common stock.

As restrictions on resale end or if these stockholders exercise their registration rights, the market price of our shares of Class A common stock could drop significantly if the holders of these shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings of our shares of Class A common stock or other securities.

In the future, we may also issue securities in connection with investments, acquisitions or capital raising activities. In particular, the number of shares of our Class A common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition, or to raise additional equity capital, could constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding shares of our Class A common stock. Any such issuance of additional securities in the future may result in additional dilution to you or may adversely impact the price of our Class A common stock.

~~General Risks~~

~~Acquisitions create certain risks and may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.~~

We have acquired businesses and may continue to make acquisitions of businesses or assets in the future. The acquisition and integration of businesses or assets involve a number of risks. These risks include valuation (determining a fair price for the business or assets), integration (managing the process of integrating the acquired business’ people, products, technology and other assets to extract the value and synergies projected to be realized in connection with the acquisition), regulation (obtaining regulatory or other government approvals that may be necessary to complete the acquisition) and due diligence (including identifying risks to the prospects of the business, including undisclosed or unknown liabilities or restrictions to be assumed in the acquisition). Moreover, we may fail to successfully identify appropriate acquisition candidates, enter new markets or industries, or integrate any acquisitions consummated in a relatively short amount of time and, as a result, may fail to realize the synergies, cost savings and other benefits expected from such acquisitions. In addition, a significant portion of the purchase price of companies we acquire may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. We are required to test goodwill and any other intangible assets with an indefinite life for possible impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently, when circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. We are also required to evaluate amortizable intangible assets and fixed assets for impairment if there are indicators of a possible impairment. In the future, if our acquisitions do not yield expected returns, we may be required to take charges to our operating results based on this impairment assessment process, which could adversely affect our results of operations. See “—Financial risks—Our balance sheet includes significant amounts of goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment of a significant portion of these assets would negatively affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.”

~~In addition, to the extent we pursue acquisitions outside of the United States, these potential acquisitions often involve additional or increased risks including:~~

~~managing geographically separated organizations, systems and facilities;~~

~~integrating personnel with diverse business backgrounds and organizational cultures;~~

~~complying with non-U.S. regulatory and other legal requirements;~~

~~addressing financial and other impacts to our business resulting from fluctuations in currency exchange rates and unit economics across multiple jurisdictions;~~

~~enforcing intellectual property rights outside of the United States;~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•

~~difficulty entering new non-U.S. markets due to, among other things, consumer acceptance and business knowledge of these markets; and~~

general economic and political conditions. See “—Business risks—Global economic, political and other conditions may adversely affect trends in consumer, business and government spending, which may adversely impact the demand for our services and our revenue and profitability.”

The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of our combined businesses and the possible loss of key personnel. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with acquisitions and their integration could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~Our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk.~~

We operate in a rapidly changing industry. Accordingly, our risk management policies and procedures may not be fully effective to identify, monitor and manage all risks our business encounters. In addition, when we introduce new services, focus on new business types, or begin to operate in markets where we have a limited history of fraud loss, we may be less able to forecast and reserve accurately for those losses. If our policies and procedures are not fully effective or we are not successful in identifying and mitigating all risks to which we are or may be exposed, we may suffer uninsured liability, harm to our reputation or be subject to litigation or regulatory actions that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. For example, if our security measures do not succeed, our business may be adversely affected. In addition, bad actors around the world use increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities involving personal data, such as unauthorized use of another’s identity or payment information, unauthorized acquisition or use of credit or debit card details and other fraudulent use of another’s identity or information.

~~Our business depends on strong and trusted brands, and damage to our reputation, or the reputation of our partners, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.~~

We market our products and services under our brands and we must protect and grow the value of our brands to continue to be successful in the future. If an incident were to occur that damages our reputation, the value of our brands could be adversely affected and our business could be damaged.

~~From time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.~~

We are involved in various litigation matters from time to time. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources and cause us to incur significant expenses. Our insurance or indemnities may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. If we are unsuccessful in our defense in these litigation matters, or any other legal proceeding, we may be forced to pay damages or fines, enter into consent decrees or change our business practices, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

An active, liquid trading market for our Class A common stock may not be sustained, which may cause our Class A common stock to trade at a discount from the price which you paid for it and make it difficult for you to sell the Class A common stock you purchase.

We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in us will sustain a trading market or how active and liquid that market may remain. If an active and liquid trading market is not sustained, you may have difficulty selling any of our Class A common stock that you purchase at a price above the price you purchase it or at all. The failure of an active and liquid trading market to continue would likely have a material adverse effect on the value of our Class A common stock. The market price of our Class A common stock may decline below the price which you paid for it, and you may not be able to sell your shares of our Class A common stock at or above the price you paid or at all. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using our shares as consideration.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they downgrade our stock or our sector, or if there is any fluctuation in our credit rating, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock relies in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. Securities and industry analysts may not publish research on our Company. If securities or industry analysts do not continue coverage of our Company, the trading price of our shares would likely be negatively impacted. Furthermore, if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade our stock or our industry, or the stock of any of our competitors, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts stops covering us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

~~Table of Contents~~

Additionally, any fluctuation in the credit rating of us or our subsidiaries may impact our ability to access debt markets in the future or increase our cost of future debt which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition, which in return may adversely affect the trading price of shares of our Class A common stock.

~~We incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company.~~

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the NYSE and other applicable securities laws and regulations. The expenses incurred by public companies generally for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing. We expect these rules and regulations to continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly. Being a public company and being subject to such rules and regulations also makes it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our executive officers. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our Class A common stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation. These factors may therefore strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

~~Our stock price may change significantly, and you may not be able to resell shares of our Class A common stock at or above the price you paid or at all, and you could lose all or~~ part of ~~your investment as a result.~~

~~You may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price which you paid for them due to a number of factors included herein, including the following:~~

this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Furthermore, the stock market may experience extreme volatility that, in some cases, may be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of our Class A common stock is low.

In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation. If we were involved in securities litigation, it could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

~~Delaware~~	~~84-3676340~~
Delaware		84-3676340
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2202 N. Irving Street Allentown, Pennsylvania			18109
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share	FOUR	The New York Stock Exchange


Large accelerated filer	☐ o	Accelerated filer	☐ o
Non-accelerated filer	☒ x	Smaller reporting company	☐ o
Emerging growth company	☒ x


	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		~~Page~~ ~~Number~~
	Item 1	Financial Statements (unaudited)		5 4
			Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	5 4
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	6 5
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Redeemable Preferred Units and Stockholders’ Equity/Members’ (Deficit)	7 6
			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	9 8
			Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	10 9
Item 2	~~Item 2.~~		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33 37
Item 3	~~Item 3.~~		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	49 54
Item 4	~~Item 4.~~		Controls and Procedures	49 54

	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	~~Item 1.~~		Legal Proceedings	50 56
Item 1A	~~Item 1A.~~		Risk Factors	50 56
Item 2	~~Item 2.~~		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	76 56
Item 3	~~Item 3.~~		Defaults Upon Senior Securities	76 56
Item 4	~~Item 4.~~		Mine Safety Disclosures	76 56
Item 5	~~Item 5.~~		Other Information	76 56
Item 6	~~Item 6.~~		Exhibits	76 57
Signatures			78 58


	Nine months ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020			2019				2021		2020
Operating activities							Operating activities
Net loss	$	(90.1	)	$	(44.3	)	Net loss	$	(60.3)	$	(89.7)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities							Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		60.1			46.3		Depreciation and amortization	76.8		59.7
Amortization of capitalized financing costs		2.9			2.8		Amortization of capitalized financing costs	4.1		2.9
Loss on extinguishment of debt		7.1			—		Loss on extinguishment of debt	0.2		7.1
Deferred income taxes		1.1			0.3		Deferred income taxes	(4.3)		1.1
Provision for bad debts		6.9			4.1		Provision for bad debts	10.3		6.9
Revaluation of contingent liabilities		(5.9	)		15.0		Revaluation of contingent liabilities	0.2		(5.9)
Impairment on software development costs		0.4			1.3
Impairment of intangible assets							Impairment of intangible assets	—		0.4
Equity-based compensation expense		56.2			—		Equity-based compensation expense	26.9		56.2
Other noncash items		(0.3	)		(0.7	)	Other noncash items	1.0		(0.3)
Impact of lease modifications		(12.4	)		—		Impact of lease modifications	—		(12.4)
Change in operating assets and liabilities							Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		(19.3	)		(11.3	)	Accounts receivable	(98.0)		(19.3)
Contract assets		(0.6	)		(1.8	)	Contract assets	—		(0.6)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(2.9	)		(2.3	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets							Prepaid expenses and other assets	(1.4)		(2.9)
Inventory		0.1			(2.3	)	Inventory	2.9		0.1
Accounts payable		16.9			13.8		Accounts payable	59.1		16.9
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(5.5	)		9.1		Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	5.3		(5.5)
Deferred revenue		2.3			3.1		Deferred revenue	2.8		2.3
Net cash provided by operating activities		17.0			33.1		Net cash provided by operating activities	25.6		17.0
Investing activities							Investing activities
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired							Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(54.2)		—
Acquisition of equipment to be leased							Acquisition of equipment to be leased	(35.3)		(5.8)
Investments in securities							Investments in securities	(29.5)		—
Customer acquisition costs							Customer acquisition costs	(19.3)		(14.4)
Capitalized software development costs							Capitalized software development costs	(13.0)		(7.0)
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment							Acquisition of property, plant and equipment	(6.3)		(2.6)
Residual commission buyouts		(2.1	)		(3.1	)	Residual commission buyouts	(4.4)		(2.1)
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment		(2.6	)		(7.7	)
Capitalized software development costs		(7.0	)		(3.7	)
Customer acquisition costs		(14.4	)		(13.6	)
Acquisition of equipment to be leased		(5.8	)		—
Acquisition, net		—			(60.2	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(31.9	)		(88.3	)	Net cash used in investing activities	(162.0)		(31.9)
Financing activities							Financing activities
Proceeds from long-term debt							Proceeds from long-term debt	632.5		—
Payments for withholding tax related to vesting of restricted stock units							Payments for withholding tax related to vesting of restricted stock units	(119.7)		—
Deferred financing costs							Deferred financing costs	(15.2)		(0.5)
Repayment of debt							Repayment of debt	(0.9)		(192.8)
IPO proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions		372.9			—		IPO proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions	—		372.9
Proceeds from private placement		100.0			—		Proceeds from private placement	—		100.0
Follow-on Offering proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions		93.4			—
September follow-on offering proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions							September follow-on offering proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions	—		93.4
Offering costs		(9.1	)		—		Offering costs	—		(9.1)
Proceeds from long-term debt		—			20.0
Proceeds from revolving line of credit		68.5			70.0		Proceeds from revolving line of credit	—		68.5
Repayment of debt		(192.8	)		(3.8	)
Repayment of revolving line of credit		(89.5	)		(20.0	)	Repayment of revolving line of credit	—		(89.5)
Payments on contingent liabilities		(1.4	)		(2.3	)	Payments on contingent liabilities	—		(1.4)
Deferred financing costs		(0.5	)		(1.7	)
Preferred return on preferred stock		(0.9	)		—		Preferred return on preferred stock	—		(0.9)
Capital distributions		(0.5	)		(0.1	)	Capital distributions	—		(0.5)
Net cash provided by financing activities		340.1			62.1		Net cash provided by financing activities	496.7		340.1
Change in cash and cash equivalents		325.2			6.9		Change in cash and cash equivalents	360.3		325.2
Cash and cash equivalents							Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period		3.7			4.8		Beginning of period	927.8		3.7
End of period	$	328.9		$	11.7		End of period	$	1,288.1	$	328.9

☒
x			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐
o			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	September 30,			December 31,
	2020			2019
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	328.9		$	3.7
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5.9 in 2020 (2019 - $2.5)		91.3			78.6
Contract assets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 in 2020 (2019 - $2.9) (Note 3)		—			6.8
Inventory (Note 5)		1.2			8.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 12)		12.3			8.8
Total current assets		433.7			106.4
Noncurrent assets
Goodwill (Note 6)		422.0			421.3
Other intangible assets, net (Note 7)		183.0			213.2
Capitalized acquisition costs, net (Note 8)		29.7			26.4
Equipment for lease, net (Note 9)		32.7			—
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 10)		14.0			15.4
Contract assets, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 in 2020 (2019 - $1.7) (Note 3)		—			3.9
Other noncurrent assets		0.5			1.4
Total noncurrent assets		681.9			681.6
Total assets	$	1,115.6		$	788.0
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity/Members' (Deficit)
Current liabilities
Current portion of debt (Note 11)	$	1.8		$	5.3
Accounts payable		76.7			58.1
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (Note 12)		26.5			60.9
Deferred revenue (Note 3)		8.1			5.6
Total current liabilities		113.1			129.9
Noncurrent liabilities
Long-term debt (Note 11)		437.7			635.1
Deferred tax liability (Note 14)		5.2			4.1
Other noncurrent liabilities (Note 4)		2.1			4.8
Total noncurrent liabilities		445.0			644.0
Total liabilities		558.1			773.9
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
Redeemable preferred units, $100,000 par value; 430 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 (Note 18)		—			43.0
Members' deficit - Shift4 Payments, LLC (Note 19)
Class A Common units, $0 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019		—			—
Class B Common units, $323 par value; 1,010 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019		—			0.3
Members' equity		—			149.2
Stockholders' equity - Shift4 Payments, Inc. (Note 19)
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2020, none issued and outstanding		—			—
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 28,550,026 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020		—			—
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 35,567,488 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020		—			—
Class C common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 15,920,291 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		572.6			—
Retained deficit		(262.6	)		(178.4	)
Total stockholders' equity attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc./members' (deficit)		310.0			(28.9	)
Noncontrolling interests		247.5			—
Total stockholders' equity/members' (deficit)		557.5			(28.9	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity/members' deficit	$	1,115.6		$	788.0


	For the three months ended September 30, 2020						For the nine months ended September 30, 2020
Consolidated Statements of Operations	As previously reported		Adjustment		As revised		As previously reported		Adjustment		As revised
Cost of sales	$	163.3	$	—	$	163.3	$	427.7	$	1.8	$	429.5
Gross profit	51.5		—		51.5		128.3		(1.8)		126.5
General and administrative expenses	35.5		(0.1)		35.4		147.0		(2.2)		144.8
Total operating expenses	55.5		(0.1)		55.4		180.8		(2.2)		178.6
Income (loss) from operations	(4.0)		0.1		(3.9)		(52.5)		0.4		(52.1)
Loss before income taxes	(10.6)		0.1		(10.5)		(91.1)		0.4		(90.7)
Net loss (a)	(9.9)		0.1		(9.8)		(90.1)		0.4		(89.7)
Basic and diluted net loss per share - Class A and Class C	(0.12)		—		(0.12)		(0.15)		—		(0.15)

Cash	$	3.8
Accounts receivable		7.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1.9
Property, plant and equipment		2.4
Inventory		1.7
Other intangible assets		20.4
Goodwill (a)		30.2
Accounts payable		(1.5	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(2.1	)
Deferred revenue		(0.3	)
Net assets acquired		64.0
Less: cash acquired		(3.8	)
Net cash paid for acquisition	$	60.2

3.	~~Revenue~~
Cash		$	42.2
Shares of Class A common stock (a)		24.5
RSUs granted for fair value of equity-based compensation awards (b)		1.8
Total purchase consideration		68.5
Less: cash acquired		(1.6)
Total purchase consideration, net of cash acquired		$	66.9


(a)Total purchase consideration includes 345,423 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2021, 341,924 shares of common stock have been issued.
(b)The Company assumed all equity awards held by continuing employees. The portion of the fair value of the equity-based compensation awards associated with prior service of VenueNext employees represents a component of the total consideration as presented above and was valued based on the fair value of the VenueNext awards on March 3, 2021, the acquisition date.

	Balance prior to lease modification		Balance subsequent to lease modification		Effect of change
Contract assets, net	$	11.3	$	—	$	(11.3	)
Accounts receivable, net		67.7		68.6		0.9
Equipment under lease		—		23.3		23.3
Deferred revenue		7.7		8.2		(0.5	)
Other operating (income) expense, net						(12.4	)


	September 30, 2021		September 30, 2020
Beginning balance	$	5.7	$	2.5
Additions to expense (a)	10.3		6.2
Write-offs, net of recoveries and other adjustments	(2.6)		(2.8)
Ending balance	$	13.4	$	5.9

4.	~~Restructuring~~
(a)Includes a $5.5 million allowance on chargebacks from a single merchant recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2021, which is included in “Cost of Sales” on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.


(a)Goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

	2018 Restructuring Activities			2019 Restructuring Activities			Total
Balance at December 31, 2019	$	4.2		$	1.5		$	5.7
Severance payments		(1.4	)		(1.5	)		(2.9	)
Accretion of interest (a)		0.4			—			0.4
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	3.2		$	—		$	3.2

Balance at December 31, 2019	$	421.3
Measurement period adjustment (Note 2)		0.7
Balance at September 30, 2020	$	422.0

	Weighted Average	September 30, 2020
	Amortization Period (in years)	Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Merchant relationships	8	$	176.8	$	100.0	$	76.8
Acquired technology	10		105.2		40.2		65.0
Trademarks and trade names	9		55.5		36.8		18.7
Noncompete agreements	2		3.9		3.9		-
Capitalized software development costs	3		21.7		4.8		16.9
Leasehold interest	2		0.1		0.1		—
Residual commission buyouts (a)	3		18.1		12.5		5.6
Total intangible assets		$	381.3	$	198.3	$	183.0

	Weighted Average	December 31, 2019
	Amortization Period (in years)	Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
Merchant relationships	8	$	176.8	$	81.1	$	95.7
Acquired technology	10		105.2		32.2		73.0
Trademarks and trade names	9		55.5		30.1		25.4
Noncompete agreements	2		3.9		3.6		0.3
Capitalized software development costs	3		14.9		2.0		12.9
Leasehold interest	2		0.1		0.1		—
Residual commission buyouts (a)	3		15.7		9.8		5.9
Total intangible assets		$	372.1	$	158.9	$	213.2

2020 (remaining three months)		13.1
2021		48.6
2022		31.6
2023		20.4
2024		18.4
Thereafter		50.9
Total	$	183.0

2020 (remaining three months)	$	4.2
2021		14.2
2022		9.2
2023		2.1
Total	$	29.7


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019			2021		2020		2021		2020
Depreciation and amortization expense	$	0.8	$	0.7	$	2.7	$	1.5	Depreciation and amortization expense	$	1.0	$	0.8	$	2.8	$	2.7
Cost of sales		0.4		0.4		1.2		1.0	Cost of sales	0.5		0.4		1.3		1.2
Total depreciation expense	$	1.2	$	1.1	$	3.9	$	2.5	Total depreciation expense	$	1.5	$	1.2	$	4.1	$	3.9


	September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Convertible Notes due 2025 (2025 Convertible Notes)	$	690.0	$	577.5
Convertible Notes due 2027 (2027 Convertible Notes)	632.5		—
Senior Notes due 2026 (2026 Senior Notes)	450.0		450.0
Other financing arrangements	—		0.9
Total borrowings	1,772.5		1,028.4
Less: Current portion of debt	—		(0.9)
	1,772.5		1,027.5
Less: Unamortized capitalized financing costs	(35.7)		(22.1)
Total long-term debt	$	1,736.8	$	1,005.4


	September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Principal outstanding	$	690.0	$	690.0
Unamortized debt discount	—		(112.5)
Unamortized debt issuance costs	(13.7)		(13.5)
Net carrying value	$	676.3	$	564.0


	September 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Prepaid insurance	$	4.5	$	2.5
Prepaid merchant signing bonuses (a)	1.4		—
Other prepaid expenses (b)	5.8		6.5
Taxes receivable	1.1		1.2
Agent and employee loan receivables	0.2		0.3
Other current assets	0.2		1.0
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	13.2	$	11.5

	Fair value as of December 31, 2019		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Contingent liabilities related to change of control (a)	$	30.4	$	—	$	—	$	30.4
Contingent liabilities related to earnout payments (a)		1.9		—		—		1.9
Total contingent liabilities	$	32.3	$	—	$	—	$	32.3

	~~(a)~~
(a)During the three months ended March 31, 2020, certain employment compensation agreements were amended. Consequently, previously recorded deferred compensation liabilities of $1.9 million associated with these agreements, included within “Other noncurrent liabilities” on the ~~unaudited Condensed~~ Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets~~Sheet at December 31, 2019, were derecognized and new liabilities of $1.7 million were recognized at fair value within “Other noncurrent liabilities” on the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These contingent liabilities were settled at the IPO for 89,842 restricted stock units.


	September 30, 2021				December 31, 2020
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
2025 Convertible Notes	$	690.0	$	835.4	$	690.0	$	843.9
2026 Senior Notes	450.0		470.8		450.0		468.0
2027 Convertible Notes	632.5		647.5		—		—
Total	$	1,772.5	$	1,953.7	$	1,140.0	$	1,311.9

	LLC Interests							Ownership percentage
	Shift4 Payments, Inc.		Continuing Equity Owners			Total		Shift4 Payments, Inc.			Continuing Equity Owners			Total				LLC Interests			Ownership percentage
Balances at June 4, 2020		38,832,816		39,204,989			78,037,805		49.8	%		50.2	%		100.0	%
																		Shift4 Payments, Inc.	Continuing Equity Owners	Total	Shift4 Payments, Inc.		Continuing Equity Owners		Total
Balances at December 31, 2020																	Balances at December 31, 2020	49,926,802	30,625,857	80,552,659	62.0	%	38.0	%	100.0	%
Issuance of LLC units		2,000,000		—			2,000,000		1.2	%		(1.2	%)		—		Issuance of LLC units	2,368,493	—	2,368,493	1.0	%	(1.0	%)	—
Redemption of LLC units		3,637,501		(3,637,501	)		—		4.6	%		(4.6	%)		—		Redemption of LLC units	4,353,203	(4,353,203)	—	5.3	%	(5.3	%)	—
Balances at September 30, 2020		44,470,317		35,567,488			80,037,805		55.6	%		44.4	%		100.0	%
Balances at September 30, 2021																	Balances at September 30, 2021	56,648,498	26,272,654	82,921,152	68.3	%	31.7	%	100.0	%

	Three months ended September 30, 2020					Nine months ended September 30, 2020
	Number of RSUs			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of RSUs			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Balance at beginning of period		4,629,812		$	21.41		—		$	—
Granted		59,283			22.29		4,690,167			21.42
Vested		—			—		—			—
Forfeited or cancelled		(13,351	)		23.00		(14,423	)		23.00
Balance at end of period		4,675,744		$	21.42		4,675,744		$	21.42


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
	Number of RSUs	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested balance at beginning of period	4,840,508	$	24.35
Granted (a)	165,751	$	74.97
Vested	(3,262,321)	$	23.09
Forfeited or cancelled	(18,206)	$	45.07
Unvested balance at end of period	1,725,732	$	31.33


(a)Includes 77,326 RSUs not subject to continued service, which vested immediately in March 2021 and 35,973 RSUs issued in connection with the VenueNext acquisition, which vest at anniversary dates ranging from six months to two years.


	Three months ended September 30, 2020			June 5, 2020 through September 30, 2020				Three Months Ended September 30, 2021		Three Months Ended September 30, 2020		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021		June 5, 2020 through September 30, 2020
Net loss	$	(9.9	)	$	(12.0	)	Net loss	$	(13.8)	$	(9.8)	$	(60.3)	$	(11.8)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(4.7	)	$	(5.7	)
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(5.2	)	$	(6.3	)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests							Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	(4.6)		(4.8)		(21.5)		(5.8)
Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.							Net loss attributable to Shift4 Payments, Inc.	$	(9.2)	$	(5.0)	$	(38.8)	$	(6.0)
Adjustment to net loss attributable to common stockholders							Adjustment to net loss attributable to common stockholders	(0.1)		(0.1)		(0.6)		(0.2)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders							Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(9.3)	$	(5.1)	$	(39.4)	$	(6.2)

Numerator - Basic and Diluted:							Numerator - Basic and Diluted:
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(5.2	)	$	(6.3	)
Allocation of net loss among common shareholders:
Net loss attributable to common stockholders							Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(9.3)	$	(5.1)	$	(39.4)	$	(6.2)
Allocation of net loss among common stockholders:							Allocation of net loss among common stockholders:
Net loss allocated to Class A common stock	$	(2.9	)	$	(3.4	)	Net loss allocated to Class A common stock	$	(8.2)	$	(2.8)	$	(33.5)	$	(3.3)
Net loss allocated to Class C common stock	$	(2.3	)	$	(2.9	)	Net loss allocated to Class C common stock	$	(1.1)	$	(2.3)	$	(5.9)	$	(2.9)

Denominator - Basic and Diluted:							Denominator - Basic and Diluted:
Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding		23,309,247			22,363,399		Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding	49,692,599		23,309,247		46,251,576		22,363,399

Weighted average shares of Class C common stock outstanding		19,222,017			19,424,100		Weighted average shares of Class C common stock outstanding	6,117,997		19,222,017		8,078,943		19,424,100

Net loss per share - Basic and Diluted:							Net loss per share - Basic and Diluted:
Class A common stock	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.15	)	Class A common stock	$	(0.17)	$	(0.12)	$	(0.72)	$	(0.15)
Class C common stock	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.15	)	Class C common stock	$	(0.17)	$	(0.12)	$	(0.72)	$	(0.15)


	Three months ended September 30, 2021	Three months ended September 30, 2020	Nine months ended September 30, 2021	June 5, 2020 through September 30, 2020
LLC Interests that convert into potential Class A common shares	27,115,975	35,567,488	28,806,699	35,567,488
RSUs and performance RSUs - employee	1,712,790	2,171,660	1,712,790	2,171,660
RSUs - non-employee directors	12,942	46,170	12,942	46,170
2025 Convertible Notes	46,130	—	49,281	—
Total	28,887,837	37,785,318	30,581,712	37,785,318

~~26.~~	~~Subsequent Events~~
(a) For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, payments-based revenue includes nonrecurring payments of $22.4 million the Company made to merchants related to the TSYS outage that are treated as contra revenue and as such reduce payments-based revenue. See Note 3 for more information about the TSYS outage. (b) For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, other costs of sales includes nonrecurring payments of $2.3 million the Company made to partners related to the TSYS outage. See Note 3 for more information about the TSYS outage.