Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~November 8, 2021,~~April 29, 2022, the registrant had ~~108,044,143~~108,658,732 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

•

If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology or obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products will be impaired.

•

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our business and any future pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease could similarly affect our business and our financial results and could cause further disruption to the development of our product candidates.

•

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to post-market study requirements, marketing and labeling restrictions and even recall or market withdrawal if unanticipated safety issues are discovered following approval. In addition, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement action if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements.

•

Global economic uncertainty or political instability could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

•

If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology or obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products will be impaired.

•

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to post-market study requirements, marketing and labeling restrictions, and even recall or market withdrawal if unanticipated safety issues are discovered following approval. In addition, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement action if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements.

iii

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains express or implied forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s belief and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these statements relate to future events or our future operational or financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•

the initiation, timing, progress, results, and cost of our research and development programs and our current and future preclinical and clinical studies, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of studies or trials and related preparatory work, the period during which the results of the trials will become available, and our research and development programs;

•

the identification of research priorities and application of a risk-mitigated strategy to efficiently discover and develop product candidates, including by applying learnings from one program to other programs and from one modality to our other modalities;

•

the potential safety and efficacy of our product candidates and the therapeutic implications of clinical and preclinical data;

•

the manufacture of our drug substances, delivery vehicles, and product candidates for preclinical use, for clinical trials and on a larger scale for commercial use, if approved;

•

our relationships with our third-party strategic collaborators and their ability to continue research and development activities relating to our development candidates and product candidates;

•

the funding for our operations necessary to complete further development and commercialization of our product candidates;

•

our plans to seek regulatory approval of our product candidates;

•

the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved;

•

the implementation of our business model, and strategic plans for our business, product candidates, and technology;

•

the scope of protection for intellectual property rights covering our product candidates and technology;

•

estimates of our future expenses, revenues, capital requirements, and our needs for additional financing;

•

the potential benefits of strategic collaboration agreements with collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;

•

future agreements with third parties in connection with the commercialization of product candidates and any other approved product;

•

the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets;

•

our financial performance;

•

the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates;

•

regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;

•

our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;

•

our ability to produce our products or product candidates with advantages in turnaround times or manufacturing cost;

•

the success of competing therapies that are or may become available;

•

our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel;

•

the impact of laws and regulations on our business and programs;

•

developments relating to our competitors and our industry;

•

the effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, including mitigation efforts and economic effects, on any of the foregoing or other aspects of our business operations, including but not limited to our preclinical studies and future clinical trials; and

•

other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption “Risk Factors.”

•

the initiation, timing, progress, results and cost of our research and development programs and our current and future preclinical and clinical studies, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of studies or trials and related preparatory work, the period during which the results of the trials will become available and our research and development programs;

•	the identification of research priorities and application of a risk-mitigated strategy to efficiently discover and develop product candidates, including by applying learnings from one program to other programs and from one modality to our other modalities;

•	~~the potential safety and efficacy of our product candidates and the therapeutic implications of clinical and preclinical data;~~

•	~~the manufacture of our drug substances, delivery vehicles and product candidates for preclinical use, for clinical trials and on a larger scale for commercial use, if approved;~~

•	~~our relationships with our third-party strategic collaborators and their ability to continue research and development activities relating to our development candidates and product candidates;~~

•	~~the funding for our operations necessary to complete further development and commercialization of our product candidates;~~

•	~~our plans to seek regulatory approval of our product candidates;~~

•	~~the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved;~~

•	~~the implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business, product candidates and technology;~~

•	~~the scope of protection for intellectual property rights covering our product candidates and technology;~~

•	~~estimates of our future expenses, revenues and capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;~~

•	~~the potential benefits of strategic collaboration agreements with collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;~~

•	~~future agreements with third parties in connection with the commercialization of product candidates and any other approved product;~~

•	~~the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates and our ability to serve those markets;~~

•	~~our financial performance;~~

•	~~the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates;~~

•	~~regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;~~

•	~~our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;~~

•	~~our ability to produce our products or product candidates with advantages in turnaround times or manufacturing cost;~~

•	~~the success of competing therapies that are or may become available;~~

•	~~our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel;~~

•	~~the impact of laws and regulations on our business and programs;~~

•	~~developments relating to our competitors and our industry;~~

•	the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, including mitigation efforts and economic effects, on any of the foregoing or other aspects of our business operations, including but not limited to our preclinical studies and future clinical trials; and

•	~~other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption “Risk Factors.”~~

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “will,” “could,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect results. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed above under “Summary of the Material Risks Associated with Our Business”, those listed below under the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or if our

underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual events or results may vary significantly from those implied or projected by the forward-looking statements. No forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we

~~iii~~

reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits hereto completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q represent our views as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We anticipate that subsequent events and developments will cause our views to change. However, while we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law. You should therefore not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business and the markets for our product candidates. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from our own internal estimates and research as well as from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any third-party information presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, their estimates, in particular as they relate to projections, involve numerous assumptions, are subject to risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ivv

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Relay Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2021			December 31, 2020			March 31, 2022			December 31, 2021
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	228,559		$	447,646		$	119,445		$	280,119
Investments		387,949			230,415			778,733			677,954
Accounts receivable		804			75,000			269			403
Contract asset		4,251			7,654			4,677			4,537
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		17,696			9,385			12,663			13,229
Total current assets		639,259			770,100			915,787			976,242
Property and equipment, net		6,239			6,250			8,904			6,543
Operating lease assets		21,239			22,579			20,309			20,780
Restricted cash		2,578			878			2,578			2,578
Intangible asset		2,300			—			2,300			2,300
Other assets		—			22
Total assets	$	671,615		$	799,829		$	949,878		$	1,008,443
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	6,316		$	6,351		$	8,053		$	8,276
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		20,102			5,760
Accrued expenses								15,217			13,557
Operating lease liabilities		1,768			1,521			1,922			1,844
Deferred revenue		331			—			166			248
Other current liabilities								16,332			396
Total current liabilities		28,517			13,632			41,690			24,321
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion		21,545			22,901			20,555			21,056
Restricted stock liability		—			3
Contingent consideration liability		50,465			—			45,663			50,258
Other liabilities								—			15,000
Total liabilities		100,527			36,536			107,908			110,635
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders’ equity:
Undesignated preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 0 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020		—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 92,800,072 and 89,991,324 shares issued at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively; 92,800,072 and 89,906,835 shares outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively		92			90
Undesignated preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021; 0 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021								—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021; 108,433,350 and 108,210,318 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively								109			109
Additional paid-in capital		1,271,630			1,167,367			1,681,225			1,666,887
Accumulated other comprehensive income		10			64
Accumulated other comprehensive loss								(9,218	)		(1,088	)
Accumulated deficit		(700,644	)		(404,228	)		(830,146	)		(768,100	)
Total stockholders’ equity		571,088			763,293			841,970			897,808
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	671,615		$	799,829		$	949,878		$	1,008,443

See accompanying notes.

Relay Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021			2020			2021			2020			2022			2021
Revenue:
Collaboration revenue	$	666		$	—		$	2,462		$	—
License and other revenue													$	419		$	952
Total revenue		666			—			2,462			—			419			952
Operating expenses:
Research and development expenses	$	44,974		$	24,376		$	120,743		$	67,739		$	51,667		$	30,622
In-process research and development expenses		—			—			123,000			—
Loss on initial consolidation of variable interest entity		—			—			11,855			—
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability		2,000			—			2,000			—			(4,595	)		—
General and administrative expenses		14,682			12,231			41,839			23,045			16,068			12,735
Total operating expenses		61,656			36,607			299,437			90,784			63,140			43,357
Loss from operations		(60,990	)		(36,607	)		(296,975	)		(90,784	)		(62,721	)		(42,405	)
Other income (expense):
Interest income		157			534			563			3,104			696			226
Other income (expense)		—			(5	)		(4	)		(8	)		(21	)		(5	)
Total other income (expense), net		157			529			559			3,096			675			221
Net loss	$	(60,833	)	$	(36,078	)	$	(296,416	)	$	(87,688	)	$	(62,046	)	$	(42,184	)
Deemed dividend resulting from extinguishment upon modification of Series C preferred stock		—			(177,789	)		—			(177,789	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(60,833	)	$	(213,867	)	$	(296,416	)	$	(265,477	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.66	)	$	(3.00	)	$	(3.20	)	$	(9.92	)	$	(0.57	)	$	(0.47	)
Weighted average shares of common stock, basic and diluted		92,692,515			71,248,846			92,599,781			26,766,687			108,293,251			90,197,579
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized holding (loss) gain		74			(455	)		(54	)		(149	)
Unrealized holding loss														(8,130	)		(52	)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		74			(455	)		(54	)		(149	)		(8,130	)		(52	)
Total comprehensive loss	$	(60,759	)	$	(36,533	)	$	(296,470	)	$	(87,837	)	$	(70,176	)	$	(42,236	)

See accompanying notes.

Relay Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Convertible Preferred Stock and~~ Stockholders’ Equity ~~(Deficit)~~

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Convertible Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Accumulated			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Par value		Capital		Income			Deficit						Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Accumulated			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2020		—	$	—		89,906,835	$	90	$	1,167,367	$	64		$	(404,228	)	$	763,293
																				Shares		Par value		Capital		Loss			Deficit
Balances at December 31, 2021																					108,210,318	$	109	$	1,666,887	$	(1,088	)	$	(768,100	)	$	897,808
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—		—		437,230		—		2,055		—			—			2,055			195,799		—		883		—			—			883
Vesting of restricted common stock		—		—		84,489		—		3		—			—			3			27,233		—		—		—			—			—
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—		—		9,671		—			—			9,671			—		—		13,455		—			—			13,455
Unrealized loss on investments		—		—		—		—		—		(52	)		—			(52	)		—		—		—		(8,130	)		—			(8,130	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—			(42,184	)		(42,184	)		—		—		—		—			(62,046	)		(62,046	)
Balances at March 31, 2021		—	$	—		90,428,554	$	90	$	1,179,096	$	12		$	(446,412	)	$	732,786
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—		—		218,365		—		1,123		—			—		$	1,123
Vesting of restricted common stock		—		—		22,239		—		—		—			—			—
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—		—		16,147		—			—			16,147
Shares issued in connection with acquisition of ZebiAI		—		—		1,883,487		2		61,946		—			—			61,948
Unrealized loss on investments		—		—		—		—		—		(76	)		—			(76	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—			(193,399	)		(193,399	)
Balances at June 30, 2021		—	$	—		92,552,645	$	92	$	1,258,312	$	(64	)	$	(639,811	)	$	618,529
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—		—		196,076		—		900		—			—			900
Vesting of restricted common stock		—		—		51,351		—		—		—			—			—
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—		—		12,418		—			—			12,418
Unrealized gain on investments		—		—		—		—		—		74			—			74
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—			(60,833	)		(60,833	)
Balances at September 30, 2021		—	$	—		92,800,072	$	92	$	1,271,630	$	10		$	(700,644	)	$	571,088
Balances at March 31, 2022																					108,433,350	$	109	$	1,681,225	$	(9,218	)	$	(830,146	)	$	841,970

	Convertible Preferred Stock						Common Stock				Additional Paid-in			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Accumulated			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Par value		Capital			Income			Deficit			(Deficit)			Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Accumulated			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2019		212,642,857		$	537,781			4,037,476	$	4	$	8,715		$	325		$	(189,482	)	$	(180,438	)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—			—			85,845		—	351				—			—		351
Vesting of restricted common stock		—			—			210,516		—		98			—			—			98
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—		—		1,455			—			—			1,455
Unrealized gain on investments		—			—			—		—		—			1,069			—			1,069
Net loss		—			—			—		—		—			—			(24,886	)		(24,886	)
Balances at March 31, 2020		212,642,857		$	537,781			4,333,837	$	4	$	10,619		$	1,394		$	(214,368	)	$	(202,351	)
																							Shares		Par value		Capital		Income			Deficit
Balances at December 31, 2020																								89,906,835	$	90	$	1,167,367	$	64		$	(404,228	)	$	763,293
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—			—			95,573		—		367			—			—			367			437,230		—		2,055		—			—			2,055
Vesting of restricted common stock		—			—			163,321		1		46			—			—			47			84,489		—		3		—			—			3
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—			—		—		4,032			—			—			4,032			—		—		9,671		—			—			9,671
Unrealized loss on investments		—			—			—		—		—			(763	)		—			(763	)		—		—		—		(52	)		—			(52	)
Net loss		—			—			—		—		—			—			(26,724	)		(26,724	)		—		—		—		—			(42,184	)		(42,184	)
Balances at June 30, 2020		212,642,857		$	537,781			4,592,731	$	5	$	15,064		$	631		$	(241,092	)	$	(225,392	)
Extinguishment upon modification of Series C preferred stock	—				177,789		—		—			(15,455	)	—				(162,334	)		(177,789	)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock into common stock upon initial public offering		(212,642,857	)		(715,570	)		61,992,534	62			715,508		—			—				715,570
Issuance of common stock in public offering, net of discounts and issuance costs of $34,707	—			—				23,000,000		23		425,270		—			—				425,293
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	—			—				101,861	—			442		—			—				442
Vesting of restricted common stock	—			—				116,659	—			5		—			—				5
Stock-based compensation expense	—			—			—		—			11,929		—			—				11,929
Unrealized loss on investments	—			—			—		—		—				(455	)	—				(455	)
Net loss	—			—			—		—		—			—				(36,078	)		(36,078	)
Balances at September 30, 2020		—		$	0			89,803,785	$	90	$	1,152,763		$	176		$	(439,504	)	$	713,525
Balances at March 31, 2021																								90,428,554	$	90	$	1,179,096	$	12		$	(446,412	)	$	732,786

See accompanying notes.

Relay Therapeutics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021			2020			2022			2021
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(296,416	)	$	(87,688	)		(62,046	)	$	(42,184	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense		38,236			17,416			13,455			9,671
Depreciation expense		2,891			2,637			975			919
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on investments		1,371			(430	)		681			153
Acquired in-process research and development		123,000			—
Loss on initial consolidation of variable interest entity		11,855			—
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability		2,000			—			(4,595	)		—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable								134			75,000
Contract asset								(140	)		(952	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(7,147	)		(3,664	)		566			1,632
Lease assets and liabilities, net		231			271
Operating lease assets and liabilities, net								48			130
Other assets								—			22
Accounts payable		(1,503	)		(1,693	)		(1,223	)		(811	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		13,082			5,934			3,054			3,060
Accounts receivable		74,276			—
Contract asset		3,403			—
Other assets		22			—
Net cash used in operating activities		(34,699	)		(67,217	)
Deferred revenue								(82	)		—
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities								(49,173	)		46,640
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(2,591	)		(1,867	)		(2,794	)		(476	)
Purchases of investments		(653,633	)		(140,097	)		(127,690	)		(619,320	)
Proceeds from maturities of investments		494,673			300,056			18,100			386,175
Cash paid for acquisition of ZebiAI, net of cash acquired		(25,215	)		—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(186,766	)		158,092
Net cash used in investing activities								(112,384	)		(233,621	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		4,078			1,160			883			2,055
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon initial public offering		—			427,800
Offering costs paid		—			(2,507	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		4,078			426,453			883			2,055
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(217,387	)		517,328
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash								(160,674	)		(184,926	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		448,524			42,832			282,697			448,524
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	231,137		$	560,160			122,023		$	263,598
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Property and equipment additions included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	33		$	—			1,552		$	100
Reclassification of restricted stock liability to additional paid-in capital	$	3		$	150			—		$	3
Assets obtained in asset acquisition	$	662		$	—
Liabilities assumed in asset acquisition	$	2,330		$	—
Extinguishment upon modification of series C preferred stock	$	—		$	(177,789	)
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock upon initial public offering	$	—		$	715,508
Fair value of equity issued in connection with asset acquisition	$	61,948		$	—

Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash from Balance Sheets to Statement of Cash Flows


	September 30, 2021		September 30, 2020		March 31, 2022		March 31, 2021
Cash and cash equivalents	$	228,559	$	559,282	$	119,445	$	262,720
Restricted cash		2,578		878		2,578		878
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as shown on condensed consolidated statements of cash flows	$	231,137	$	560,160	$	122,023	$	263,598

See accompanying notes.

Relay Therapeutics, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

1. Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Relay Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on May 4, 2015 and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Company is a clinical-stage, precision medicines company transforming the drug discovery process by combining leading-edge computational and experimental technologies with the goal of bringing life-changing therapies to patients. ~~The~~As the Company believes it is among the first of a new breed of biotech created at the intersection of disparate ~~disciplines.~~technologies, the Company aims to push the boundaries of what’s possible in drug discovery. The Company’s Dynamo™ platform integrates an array of leading-edge computational and experimental approaches designed to drug protein targets that have previously been ~~intractable or inadequately addressed.~~intractable. The Company’s initial focus is on enhancing small molecule therapeutic discovery in targeted oncology and genetic disease indications. The ~~Company is advancing its pipeline of medicines to address targets in precision oncology, including its~~Company’s lead product candidates, RLY-4008, RLY-2608 and ~~RLY-1971.~~RLY-1971, are in clinical development. The Company ~~initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial for RLY-1971 in patients with advanced solid tumors in the first quarter of 2020~~also has over five discovery stage programs across both precision oncology and a first-in-human clinical trial of RLY-4008 enriched for patients with advanced solid tumors having oncogenic FGFR2 alterations in the third quarter of 2020. In December 2020, the Company entered into the Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Genentech Agreement”) with Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”), a member of the Roche Group, for the development and commercialization of RLY-1971, as further discussed in Note 6.genetic disease indications.

The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry including, but not limited to, new technological innovations, protection of proprietary technology, dependence on key personnel, compliance with government regulations and the need to obtain additional financing. Product candidates currently under development will require significant additional research and development efforts, including extensive ~~pre-clinical~~preclinical and clinical testing and regulatory approval, prior to commercialization. These efforts require significant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel infrastructure and extensive compliance-reporting capabilities.

The Company’s product candidates are in development. There can be no assurance that the Company’s research and development will be successfully completed, that adequate protection for the Company’s intellectual property will be obtained, that any products developed will obtain necessary government regulatory approval or that any approved products will be commercially viable. Even if the Company’s product development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will generate significant revenue from product sales. The Company operates in an environment of rapid change in technology and substantial competition from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. In addition, the Company is dependent upon the services of its employees and consultants.

The Company has devoted substantially all of its resources to developing its product candidates, including RLY-4008, RLY-2608 and RLY-1971, by developing its ~~innovative computational~~computation and experimental approaches, building its intellectual property portfolio, business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations.

The Company has incurred net operating losses since inception and had an accumulated deficit of ~~$700.6~~$830.1 million as of ~~September 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022. The Company expects that its existing cash, cash equivalents and investments as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 will enable it to fund its planned operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least one year from the date of the issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements. The future viability of the Company is dependent on its ability to generate cash from operating activities or to raise additional capital to finance its operations. The Company’s failure to raise capital as and when needed could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and ability to pursue its business strategies. The Company may not be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms, or at all, and the Company may not be able to enter into license or collaboration arrangements or obtain government grants. The terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of the Company’s stockholders. If the Company is unable to obtain funding, the Company could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate its research and development programs, product portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect its business prospects. In the event the Company requires additional funding, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in obtaining sufficient funding on terms acceptable to the Company to fund its continuing operations, if at all.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for reporting on Form 10-Q. The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Relay Therapeutics, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Relay Therapeutics Securities Corporation and Relay ML Discovery, LLC.

All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Certain prior period amounts, specifically including certain current liabilities, have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, as previously reported.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022, the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ the condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity ~~(deficit)~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, and the condensed consolidated

statements of cash flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are unaudited. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022, the condensed consolidated results of its operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020~~2021 and cash flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020.~~2021. The condensed consolidated financial data and other information disclosed in these notes related to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are unaudited. The condensed consolidated results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2021,~~2022, any other interim periods, or any future year or period.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the ~~accrual~~fair value of ~~research and development and manufacturing expenses,~~contingent milestone payments in connection with the ~~valuation~~acquisition of ~~equity instruments,~~ZebiAI Therapeutics, Inc. (“ZebiAI”), the determination of the transaction price and standalone selling price of performance obligations under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the accrual of research and development and manufacturing expenses, the valuation of equity instruments and the incremental borrowing rate for determining the operating lease assets and ~~liabilities, and the fair value of contingent consideration and the fair value of net assets acquired in the acquisition of ZebiAI.~~liabilities. Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and experience.

The full extent to which the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will directly or indirectly impact the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition, including expenses, clinical trials and research and development costs, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain, including as a result of new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions taken to contain or treat COVID-19, as well as the economic impact on local, regional, national and international markets. The Company has made estimates of the impact of COVID-19 within its financial statements and there may be changes to those estimates in future periods. Actual results could differ from the Company’s estimates.

~~Collaboration Agreements~~

The Company enters into collaborative agreements with third parties to research, develop and commercialize drug candidates, pursuant to which the risks and rewards for such activities are shared between the parties. Such arrangements also provide for cost sharing between the parties during the research and development phase, as well as potential future profit share payments during the commercialization phase. In general, such contracts are evaluated under the provisions of FASB ASC 808, ~~Collaborative Arrangements~~ (“ASC 808”). The amounts receivable and payable for research and development activities are presented net within research and development expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations, as such the net costs reflect the Company’s share of the ongoing research and development efforts. The amounts receivable and payable for commercialization activities are presented net as either collaboration revenue, separate from revenue from contracts with customers, or collaboration expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations, as appropriate.

~~Acquired In-Process Research and Development~~

In an asset acquisition, the cost allocated to acquire in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) with no alternative future use is charged to expense at the acquisition date. Refer to Note 5, Acquisition of ZebiAI, for a more detailed description of the accounting policies applied to the recent asset acquisition.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

~~Effective January 1, 2021, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06,~~ ~~Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options~~ ~~(Subtopic 470-20)~~ ~~and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity~~ (Subtopic 815-40) (“ASU 2020-16”). This standard amends the guidance on convertible instruments and the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity and amends the related earnings per share (“EPS”) guidance. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

~~Effective January 1, 2021, the Company adopted ASU 2019-12,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes~~ (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify the accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends certain aspects of the existing guidance to improve consistent application. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted~~

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ~~This standard requires~~Certain amendments thereto were also issued by the FASB. ASU 2016-13 and the related amendments thereto require that credit losses be reported as an allowance using an expected losses model, representing the entity’s current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred. The ~~accounting guidance currently in effect for~~

Company adopted ASU 2016-13 and the Company is based on an incurred losses model. For available-for-sale debt securities with expected credit losses, this standard now requires allowances to be recorded instead of reducing the amortized cost of the investment.~~The Company will become a large accelerated filer for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 and, therefore, be required to adopt this standard~~related amendments thereto on January 1, 2022.The ~~Company is assessing the impact~~adoption of ASU 2016-13 onand the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures and does~~related amendments thereto did not ~~expect it to~~ have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements or ~~disclosures.~~disclosures as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies that the Company adopts as of the specified effective date. The Company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 and has elected to use the extended transition period related to complying with new or revised accounting standards, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different effective dates for public and nonpublic companies, the Company can adopt the new or revised standard at the time nonpublic companies adopt the new or revised standard and can do so until such timedoes not believe that the ~~Company either (i) irrevocably elects to “opt out”~~adoption of ~~such extended transition period~~any recently issued standards have or ~~(ii) no longer qualifies as an emerging growth company.~~may have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

~~As noted above, the Company will become a large accelerated filer for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, and as such it will lose emerging growth status as of that date.~~

3. Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the level of the fair value hierarchy utilized to determine such fair values:


	Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2021:								Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2022:
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Total
Assets
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	216,195	$	—	$	—	$	216,195	$	93,469	$	—	$	—		$	93,469
Investments:
US treasury bills		—		256,668		—		256,668
US agency securities		—		131,281		—		131,281
U.S. treasury bills										—		519,475		—			519,475
U.S. agency securities										—		259,258		—			259,258
Total investments		—		387,949		—		387,949		—		778,733		—			778,733
Total assets	$	216,195	$	387,949	$	—	$	604,144	$	93,469	$	778,733	$	—		$	872,202
Liabilities
Contingent consideration		—		—		45,465		45,465
Contingent Milestone Payments									$	—	$	—	$	(45,663	)	$	(45,663	)
Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	45,465	$	45,465	$	—	$	—	$	(45,663	)	$	(45,663	)


	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2021:
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	251,891	$	—	$	—	$	251,891
Investments:
U.S. treasury bills		—		469,386		—		469,386
U.S. agency securities		—		208,568		—		208,568
Total investments		—		677,954		—		677,954
Total assets	$	251,891	$	677,954	$	—	$	929,845
Liabilities
Contingent Milestone Payments	$	—	$	—	$	45,258	$	45,258
Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	45,258	$	45,258

Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2020:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets

Cash equivalents:

Money market funds

$
447,146

$
—

$
—

$
447,146

Investments:

US treasury bills

—

33,026

—

33,026

US agency securities

—

197,389

—

197,389

Total investments

—

230,415

—

230,415

Total

$
447,146

$
230,415

$
—

$
677,561

In determining the fair value of its investments at each date presented above, the Company relied on quoted prices for similar securities in active markets or using other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Liability

In April 2021, the Company acquired ~~ZebiAI Therapeutics, Inc. (“ZebiAI”).~~ ZebiAI.

The Company’s Level 3 contingent consideration liability is related to ~~$85.0~~$85.0 million of platform and program-related milestones (“Contingent Milestone Payments”) potentially payable to ZebiAI’s former equity holders, measured at $43.5 million as of the acquisition date and $45.5 million as of September 30, 2021. The Company determines the fair value of the contingent payments based on the probability of achieving the milestones, the related timing and an appropriate discount rate. Significant judgment is used in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions.holders. The contingent consideration liability for the Contingent Milestone Payments is measured at fair value at each reporting date pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”) ~~(Refer~~. The Company determines the fair value of the Contingent Milestone Payments based on the probability of achieving the milestones, the related timing, and, to ~~Note 5).~~a lesser extent, an appropriate discount rate. Significant judgment is used in determining these assumptions. Due to the uncertainties associated with the development of platforms and drug candidates in the pharmaceutical industry and the effects of changes in ~~other~~ assumptions including probability of success and related timing, the Company expects its estimates regarding the fair value of Contingent Milestone Payments to continue to change in the future,

resulting in adjustments to the fair value of the Company’s Contingent Milestone Payments, and the effect of any such adjustments could be material.

The Company also has a contingent consideration ~~associated with~~liability related to the ~~$100.0~~fair value of $100.0 million in earnout payments (“Contingent Earnout Payments”) ~~is a nonrecurring~~. Because the Contingent Earnout Payments were not accounted for as derivatives under FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, they were only measured at fair value ~~measure,~~ as ~~further discussed in Note 5.~~of the acquisition date and are not re-assessed at fair value at each reporting period. The Contingent Earnout Payments will be adjusted when the contingency is resolved and the consideration is paid or becomes payable.

The following table reconciles the change in fair value of the contingent consideration liability ~~based on level 3 inputs~~ (in thousands):

Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2021

Balance at December 31, 2020
$
—

Contingent consideration related to acquisition of ZebiAI

43,465

Increase in fair value of contingent payments

2,000

Balance at September 30, 2021
$
45,465


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
Balance at December 31, 2021	$	50,258
Change in fair value of Contingent Milestone Payments		(4,595	)
Balance at March 31, 2022	$	45,663

The ~~“Increase~~“Change in fair value of ~~contingent payments”~~Contingent Milestone Payments” in the table above was ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~the time value of money.~~

~~4. Investments~~

~~The fair value of available-for-sale investments by type of security was as follows:~~

September 30, 2021

Amortized
Cost

Unrealized
Gains

Unrealized
Losses

Fair
Value

Investments:

U.S treasury bills

$
117,993

$
13

$
—

$
118,006

U.S agency securities

29,497

1

—

29,498

Total investments with a maturity of one year or less

147,490

14

—

147,504

U.S treasury bills

138,675

—

(13
)

138,662

U.S agency securities

101,774

9

—

101,783

Total investments with a maturity of one to two years

240,449

9

(13
)

240,445

Total investments

$
387,939

$
23

$
(13
)

$
387,949

December 31, 2020

Amortized
Cost

Unrealized
Gains

Unrealized
Losses

Fair
Value

Investments:

U.S treasury bills

$
29,997

$
21

$
—

$
30,018

U.S agency securities

20,996

5

—

21,001

Total investments with a maturity of one year or less

50,993

26

—

51,019

U.S treasury bills

3,008

—

—

3,008

U.S agency securities

176,350

38

—

176,388

Total investments with a maturity of one to two years

179,358

38

—

179,396

Total investments

$
230,351

$
64

$
—

$
230,415

~~5. Acquisition of ZebiAI~~

On April 22, 2021 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired ZebiAI, a privately held company focused on using machine learning combined with DNA encoded library data sets for drug discovery. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), the Company was required to pay ZebiAI’s former stockholders, option holders and warrant holders (“the ZebiAI Holders”) upfront consideration of approximately $20.0 million in cash and issued 1,883,487 shares of the Company’s common stock at an aggregate fair value of $60.8 million. In addition, (i) the ZebiAI Holders will be eligible to receive up to an additional $85.0 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of certain platform or program-related milestones, payable in common stock (the “Contingent Milestone Payments”), and (ii) the Company will pay to the ZebiAI Holders 10% of the payments it receives within three years of the closing date of the Merger Agreement from partnering, collaboration or other agreements related to ZebiAI’s platform up to an aggregate maximum amount of $100.0 million, payable in cash (the “Contingent Earnout Payments”).

The Company first assessed if ZebiAI represented an asset or a business under FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), as amended by ASU 2017-01. Under ASC 805, the Company determined that ZebiAI did not constitute a business since substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset, which is the intellectual property for the AI platform and the related data sets in development by ZebiAI. The intellectual property acquired from ZebiAI is at an early stage of development and will require a significant investment of time and capital for development. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in completing the additional research and development activities.

The Company also determined that the acquisition represented an initial consolidation of a variable interest entity that does not constitute a business in accordance with FASB Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”), primarily as a result of the fact that ZebiAI was deemed to be a variable interest entity as it did not have sufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. ~~Prior to the Acquisition Date, the source of funding for ZebiAl had primarily been preferred stock financings and convertible notes~~. The Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of ZebiAI, and therefore is the sole equity holder. The Company will absorb the losses of ZebiAi, has the rights to the benefits derived from the ZebiAi platform and the power to direct all activities, and therefore is the primary beneficiary. As a result, the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the ZebiAI acquisition were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the Acquisition Date. Total consideration transferred of $~~135.5~~ million included the cash and shares issued to ZebiAI Holders, the fair value of the Contingent Milestone Payments and the Contingent Earnout Payments and an insignificant amount attributed to the replacement of stock options to ZebiAI Holders. The Contingent Milestone Payments were determined to be liabilities pursuant to ASC 480 and therefore were included in consideration transferred. The Contingent Earnout Payments were required to be included in total consideration transferred as a result of ASC 810. The difference between total consideration transferred and the fair value of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed of $~~11.9~~ ~~million was recorded as loss on initial consolidation of a variable interest entity pursuant to ASC 810.~~

~~The following table summarizes the net assets acquired based on their estimated fair values as of the Acquisition Date (in thousands):~~

Acquired IPR&D asset
$
123,000

Loss on initial consolidation of VIE

11,855

Assets obtained in asset acquisition

662

Liabilities assumed in asset acquisition

(2,330
)
Intangible asset

2,300

Net acquired assets
$
135,487

In the estimation of fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed, the Company used the carrying value of the net working capital balances as the most reliable indicator of fair value based on the associated short-term nature of the balances. The remaining fair value was attributable to the acquired IPR&D and an intangible asset. The fair value attributable to the IPR&D asset was determined using an Avoided Cost Method that includes all costs to develop the IPR&D asset, including appropriate mark-ups on the cost estimate and an expected return related to developing the IPR&D asset over a period of time. The fair value of the IPR&D asset was expensedchanges in the ~~Company’s consolidated statements of operations~~assumptions noted above through March 31, 2022, primarily changes in timing and comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 as the acquired IPR&D had no alternative future use, as determined by the Company in accordance with U.S. GAAP, including ASC 730. The intangible asset represents the assembled workforce, for which the Company concluded there were no indicators of impairment through September 30, 2021.interest rates.The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense associated with the accelerated vesting for certain stock options in connection with the acquisition of ZebiAI in the amount of $4.6 million in the statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2021.In connection with the acquisition, the Company recognized acquisition-related costs of $0.9 million within general and administrative expenses in the statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2021.

The Company recorded a contingent consideration liability at the Acquisition Date based upon the fair value of the Contingent Milestone Payments and the Contingent Earnout Payments of $48.5 million. The Company is required to re-assess the fair value of the Contingent Milestone Payments at each reporting period pursuant to ASC 480 (refer to Note 3).The Contingent Milestone Payments are payable in shares of common ~~shares~~stock based on a fixed amount assigned to each milestone and the ~~weighted average~~weighted-average share price of the Company’s stock for the 5-day period prior to the milestone achievement. Accordingly, the number of shares to be issued upon a milestone achievement vary dependent on the Company’s stock price. The settlement amounts of Contingent Milestone Payments are predominantly fixed. If the milestones were achieved in full on ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the number of shares to be issued would be ~~2,414,498~~2,806,207 based on a weighted average per share price of ~~$35.20~~$30.29 for the 5-day period prior to ~~September 30, 2021.~~ March 31, 2022.

4. Investments

The ~~Contingent Earnout Payments were not accounted for as derivatives under FASB ASC Topic 815,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging,~~ ~~and therefore are not re-assessed at~~ fair value of available-for-sale investments by type of security was as follows:


	March 31, 2022
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Investments:
U.S. treasury bills	$	320,925	$	—	$	(2,122	)	$	318,803
U.S. agency securities		158,162		—		(1,004	)		157,158
Total investments with a maturity of one year or less		479,087		—		(3,126	)		475,961

U.S. treasury bills		204,602		—		(3,930	)		200,672
U.S. agency securities		104,262		—		(2,162	)		102,100
Total investments with a maturity of one to two years		308,864		—		(6,092	)		302,772
Total investments	$	787,951	$	—	$	(9,218	)	$	778,733


	December 31, 2021
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Investments:
U.S. treasury bills	$	189,406	$	—	$	(228	)	$	189,178
U.S. agency securities		108,895		—		(138	)		108,757
Total investments with a maturity of one year or less		298,301		—		(366	)		297,935

U.S. treasury bills		280,743		—		(535	)		280,208
U.S. agency securities		99,998		—		(187	)		99,811
Total investments with a maturity of one to two years		380,741		—		(722	)		380,019
Total investments	$	679,042	$	—	$	(1,088	)	$	677,954

Pursuant to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-13 and the related amendments thereto on January 1, 2022, the Company reviews investments whenever the fair value of an investment is less than the amortized cost and evidence indicates that an investment’s carrying amount is not recoverable within a reasonable period of time. In connection therewith, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors, considering the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that is not related to credit is recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as a provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense in general and administrative expenses within the condensed consolidated statement of operations. Losses are charged against the allowance when the Company believes the uncollectability of an available-for-sale security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.

The Company held 109 and 88 debt securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The unrealized losses at ~~each reporting period.~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were attributable to changes in interest rates and the unrealized losses do not represent credit losses. The ~~Contingent Earnout Payments~~Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that it will be ~~adjusted when the contingency is resolved~~required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis.

The following table summarizes our available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded at March 31, 2022, aggregated by major security type and ~~the consideration is paid or becomes payable.~~length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):


	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

U.S. treasury bills	$	519,475	$	(6,052	)	$	—	$	—	$	519,475	$	(6,052	)
U.S. agency securities		259,258		(3,166	)		—		—		259,258		(3,166	)
Total	$	778,733	$	(9,218	)	$	—	$	—	$	778,733	$	(9,218	)

6. The following table summarizes our available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded at December 31, 2021, aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):


	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

U.S. treasury bills	$	469,386	$	(763	)	$	—	$	—	$	469,386	$	(763	)
U.S. agency securities		208,568		(325	)		—		—		208,568		(325	)
Total	$	677,954	$	(1,088	)	$	—	$	—	$	677,954	$	(1,088	)

5. Collaboration and License Arrangements

Discovery Collaboration Agreement with EQRx, Inc.

~~In August 2021,~~During the ~~Company~~three months ended March 31, 2022, there were no changes to the Company’s Discovery and ~~EQRx, Inc. (“EQRx”), a related party, entered into the Discovery~~ Collaboration Agreement (“Collaboration Agreement”) with EQRx, Inc. (“EQRx”) from August 2021. Accordingly, there were no changes to ~~discover, develop, and commercialize novel medicines against validated oncology targets. Under~~ the ~~terms of the Collaboration Agreement, the Company is responsible for the discovery phase~~Company’s accounting treatment thereon through to filing of the application for an Investigational New Drug (“IND”), while EQRx is responsible for clinical development, regulatory and commercialization of the product candidates under the collaboration. Subject to certain opt-out rights, the Company and EQRx share equally in the discovery, development

and commercialization costs, as well as the net profits and losses from sales of any collaboration medicines, if approved. The Company retains the right to develop any collaboration medicines in combination with its wholly-owned pipeline.March 31, 2022.

~~The Company accounts for the Collaboration Agreement pursuant to its accounting policy on collaboration arrangements, as disclosed in Note 2.~~ During the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, expenses related to the Collaboration Agreement were immaterial.

Collaboration and License Agreement with Genentech, Inc.

On December 11, 2020, the Company entered into the Genentech Agreement, which granted Genentech a license to develop and commercialize RLY-1971. RLY-1971 is currently being developed in a Phase 1a clinical trial for patients with advanced solid tumors (the “Phase 1a Trial”). Unless Genentech elects to exercise its option to conduct the remainder of the ongoing Phase 1a Trial, the Company is responsible for the completion of this trial. Genentech is responsible for conducting all subsequent clinical development of RLY-1971. The Company is also responsible for the one-time transfer of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) and other materials related to RLY-1971 to Genentech.

Under the Genentech Agreement, the Company received a non-refundable upfront payment of $75.0 million, which was due upon completion of certain technology transfer activities and was reflected as accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2020. The Company collected this amount in full in January 2021. In April 2021, the Company completed the transfer of the IND application for RLY-1971 to Genentech upon which the Company received payment for the associated non-refundable milestone payment of $5.0 million in May 2021. The Company is eligible to receive up to $20.0 million in additional near-term milestone payments. The Company is also eligible to receive up to an aggregate of an additional $695.0 million upon the achievement of specified development, commercialization and sales-based milestones for RLY-1971 worldwide as well as tiered royalties ranging from low-to-mid teens on annual worldwide net sales of RLY-1971, on a country-by-country basis, subject to reduction in certain circumstances.

The Company has the option, exercisable one time at the Company’s sole discretion, to (a) fund half of the development costs of RLY-1971 in the United States, (b) share half of the net profits or net loss of commercializing RLY-1971 in the U.S. (the “Profit/Cost Share”) and (c) be eligible to receive up to an aggregate of an additional $410.0 million upon the achievement of specified commercialization and sales-based milestones for RLY-1971 outside of the United States and tiered royalties ranging from low-to-mid teens on annual net sales of RLY-1971 outside of the United States, on a country-by-country basis, subject to reduction in certain circumstances. The Company may elect to opt-out of further participation in the Profit/Cost Share at any time prior to the third anniversary of the first commercial sale of RLY-1971 in the U.S, in which case the financial terms would revert to the terms applicable as if the Company had not opted into the Profit/Cost Share as of the effective opt-out date.

Genentech may terminate the Genentech Agreement for convenience and the Company may terminate the Genentech Agreement under certain limited circumstances. Unless otherwise terminated, the Genentech Agreement will remain in effect until the expiration of all Genentech’s royalty payment obligations to the Company.

~~Accounting Analysis~~

~~Identification of the Contract~~

~~The Company concluded that Genentech is a customer in this arrangement and as such, the arrangement falls within the scope of the revenue recognition guidance in ASC 606.~~

~~Identification of Performance Obligations~~

~~At the commencement of the Genentech Agreement, the Company identified the following performance obligations in the agreement:~~

•

~~License to develop and commercialize RLY-1971 and the related know-how;~~

•

~~Research and development services to complete the Phase 1a Trial for RLY-1971; and~~

•

~~Transfer of API and other materials related to RLY-1971~~

The Company determined that the performance obligations outlined above are both capable of being distinct and distinct within the context of the contract given such rights and activities are independent of each other. The license can be used by ~~Genentech without the research and development services or API outlined above,~~ ~~and similarly those services and inventory provide distinct benefit to Genentech within the context of the contract, separate from the license.~~

~~Determination of Transaction Price~~

The Company determined the transaction price for the Genentech Agreement to be $86.3 million, which includes both fixed and variable consideration amounts. The total transaction price of $86.3 million is comprised of (i) the $75.0 million fixed, non-refundable upfront payment, (ii) a $5.0 million non-refundable milestone payment due upon the transfer of the ~~IND application~~ to Genentech, which was received by the Company in May 2021, (iii) a $5.0 million non-refundable milestone payment due upon completion of the Phase 1a Trial for RLY-1971 and (iv) $1.3 million of estimated variable consideration related to reimbursements due from Genentech for research and

development services. NaN additional development milestone payments and 0 regulatory milestone payments are included in the transaction price as all such payments are fully constrained. As part of management’s evaluation of the constraint, the Company considered numerous factors, including the consideration that achievement of the milestones is outside of the Company’s control, contingent upon Genentech’s efforts and the receipt of regulatory approval and subject to scientific risks of success.

~~Allocation of Transaction Price to Performance Obligations~~

~~The Company allocated the transaction price of $86.3 million based on the stand-alone selling prices (“SSP”) of each of the performance obligations as follows:~~

•

~~$82.9 million for the transfer of the license~~

•

~~$3.0 million for research and development services; and~~

•

~~$0.4 million for the transfer of API.~~

The SSP for the license was determined using an approach that considered discounted, probability-weighted cash flows related to the license transferred. The Company also reviewed comparable market transactions in determining the SSP of the license. The SSP for the research and development services as well as the transfer of API were based on estimates of the associated effort and cost of these services and cost to manufacture API, adjusted for a reasonable profit margin that would be expected to be realized under similar contracts.

~~Recognition of Revenue~~

~~The Company is recognizing revenue for each of the three performance obligations as follows:~~

•

The Company recognized revenue related to the license at a point in time upon transfer of the license to Genentech. The Company recognized the full amount allocated to the license and related know-how in the fourth quarter of 2020 because the Company had transferred the license upon execution of the Genentech Agreement.

•

The Company is satisfying the research and development performance obligation for RLY-1971 as the research and development services are performed. The research and development services performance obligation consists of the Company completing the Phase 1a clinical trial initiated in the first quarter of 2020. The Company recognizes revenue related to the research and development services over time using a cost-based input method by calculating actual costs incurred to date at each period end relative to total estimated costs expected to be incurred to fulfill the performance obligation. Revenue recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 related to the R&D services amounts to $0.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

•

The Company recognized the full amount of revenue allocated to the transfer of API in the first quarter of 2021 upon transfer to Genentech in the amount of $0.4 million. There was 0 revenue recognized related to this performance obligation during the year ended December 31, 2020.

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022, there were no material changes to the Company’s Collaboration and License Agreement (“License Agreement”) with Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) from December 2020.Accordingly, there were no changes to the Company’s accounting treatment thereon through March 31, 2022.

During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized an aggregate of ~~$0.4~~$0.2 million and ~~$2.1~~$1.0 million of revenue from the ~~Genentech~~License Agreement, respectively. ~~At September 30,~~

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company recorded a contract asset in the amount of ~~$4.3~~$4.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively, which is classified as a current asset on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The contract asset relates to the amount of revenue recognized for which the right to payment is contingent upon conditions other than the passage of time, such as the completion of future milestone activities.

~~7. Common Stock~~

~~The Company issued restricted shares~~As of ~~common stock to its founders~~March 31, 2022 and non-employees. In addition, the Company issued restricted shares of common stock upon the early exercise of stock options under the Company’s 2016 Stock Option and Grant Plan (the “2016 Stock Plan”). The restrictions on the common shares generally lapse over four years. The Company included the proceeds from the sale of the restricted shares of common stock as a restricted stock liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Amounts are reclassified to additional paid-in capital as the restrictions lapse. The Company has the right to repurchase any unvested shares of restricted common stock at the original cost in the event of termination.

~~At-the-Market Offering~~

~~In August~~December 31, 2021, the Company ~~entered into~~recorded an other liability in the amount of $15.0 million. The liability represents the cash received for a ~~sales agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Cowen~~ milestone payment in December 2021. The amount has been excluded from the transaction price at both March 31, 2022 and Company, LLC (“Cowen”) pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock having aggregate gross proceeds of up to $300.0 million from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings through Cowen, as the Company’s sales agent. The Company agreed to pay Cowen a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds of any shares sold by Cowen under the Sales Agreement. There have been 0 shares of common stock sold under the Sales Agreement through September 30, 2021.

~~8. Share-Based Payments~~

In 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Stock Plan. On July 8, 2020, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2020 Stock Plan”), which became effective on the date immediately prior to the effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 for its IPO. The 2020 Stock Plan provides for the issuance of up to 8,376,080 of share-based awards.

Subsequent to July 20, 2020, no further awards will be made under the 2016 Stock Plan and all future equity-based awards are granted under the 2020 Stock Plan. To the extent outstanding options granted under the 2016 Plan are cancelled, forfeited or otherwise terminated without being exercised and would otherwise have been returned to the share reserve under the 2016 Plan, the number of shares underlying such awards will be available for future grant under the 2020 Stock Plan. All of the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants are eligible to be granted options, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards under the terms of the 2020 Stock Plan. There were 9,770,520 share-based awards available for grant at September 30, 2021.

In July 2020, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that permits eligible employees to enroll in six-month offering periods. Participants may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, through payroll deductions, at a price equal to 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the applicable six-month offering period, whichever is lower. Purchase dates under the ESPP occur on or about June 30 and December 31, ~~each year, with~~2021 and, therefore, excluded from amounts recognized as revenue, since the ~~initial such purchase date under the ESPP set at December 31, 2021. In connection therewith, the Company’s shareholders authorized 1,092,532 shares for issuance pursuant to the ESPP, which~~amount is subject to ~~annual increases~~repayment to ~~be added on~~Genentech if the ~~first day of each fiscal year, commencing on January 1, 2021, equal~~Company exercises its option to participate in the ~~lesser of 2,185,064 shares of~~profit/cost share under the ~~Company’s common stock, 1% of the number of outstanding shares on the immediately preceding December 31, or an amount determined by the Board.~~License Agreement.

6. Stock Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss is as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021		2020		2021		2020		2022		2021
Research and development expenses	$	6,124	$	5,367	$	20,420	$	8,205	$	7,110	$	4,151
General and administrative expenses		6,294		6,562	$	17,816		9,211		6,345		5,520
	$	12,418	$	11,929	$	38,236	$	17,416	$	13,455	$	9,671

9.7. Net Loss Per Share

The following table summarizes the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share of the Company:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021			2020			2021			2020			2022			2021
Net loss	$	(60,833	)	$	(36,078	)	$	(296,416	)	$	(87,688	)	$	(62,046	)	$	(42,184	)
Deemed dividend resulting from extinguishment upon modification of series C preferred stock	$	—		$	(177,789	)	$	—		$	(177,789	)
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(60,833	)	$	(213,867	)	$	(296,416	)	$	(265,477	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.66	)	$	(3.00	)	$	(3.20	)	$	(9.92	)	$	(0.57	)	$	(0.47	)
Weighted average shares of common stock, basic and diluted		92,692,515			71,248,846			92,599,781			26,766,687			108,293,251			90,197,579

The Company’s potentially dilutive securities, which include outstanding options to purchase common stock and restricted stock units ~~and unvested restricted stock,~~summarized below, have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated below, as the effect would be toanti-dilutive and reduce the net loss per share. Therefore, the weighted average number of shares of common ~~shares~~stock outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per share is the same. The Company excluded the following potential common shares, presented based on amounts outstanding at each period end, from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2021		2020		2021		2020		2022		2021
Options to purchase common stock		8,936,107		7,461,779		8,936,107		7,461,779		11,251,697		8,529,232
Restricted stock units		608,336		—		608,336		—		1,743,965		357,654
Unvested restricted stock		—		173,818		—		173,818
		9,544,443		7,635,597		9,544,443		7,635,597		12,995,662		8,886,886

~~10.~~8. Commitments and Contingencies

Intellectual Property License

~~The Company has a Collaboration and License Agreement with D. E. Shaw Research, LLC (“D. E. Shaw Research”)which held 9,999,999 shares of Series A preferred stock and 1,557,875 shares of Series C preferred stock at December~~During the three months ended March 31, 2019. Upon the IPO these shares were converted into 3,281,253 shares of common stock, which are outstanding at September 30, 2021. The agreement provides that the parties will jointly conduct research efforts with the goal of identifying and developing product candidates. The original term of the agreement was three years and required2022, the Company to pay an annual fee of $1.0 million. On June 15, 2020, the Company and D. E. Shaw Research agreed to amend the Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement”). The Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement extended the term of the agreement to August 16, 2025 and increased the annual fee from $1.0 million to $7.9 million. The Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement automatically renews for successive one year periods unless either party provides at least one year notice of non-renewal, and the annual fee during each of the one year renewal terms is subject to the mutual agreement of the Company and D. E. Shaw Research. On May 12, 2021, the Company and D. E. Shaw Research amended the Amended and Restated Collaboration and License Agreement (“DESRES Agreement”) with D.E. Shaw Research, LLC (“D.E. Shaw Research”), specifically to ~~increase the annual fee from $7.9 million to $9.9 million, commencing on August 16, 2021.~~

~~The Company is obligated to pay potential development milestone payments under the terms~~update certain of the ~~agreement up~~Category 1, Category 2, and Category 3 Target lists thereunder. However, there was no change to ~~$7.3 million per target, plus sales milestones and royalties, upon~~ the ~~achievement of certain specified contingent events. Such payments~~Company’s accounting treatment or incremental amounts recognized in connection therewith for ~~achievement of development and regulatory milestones total up to $7.3 million in~~ the ~~aggregate for each of the first~~ three ~~products the Company develops, and up to $6.3 million in the aggregate for each product the Company develops after the first three.~~ months ended March 31, 2022.

The Company assessed the ~~milestone~~milestones under the DESRES Agreement at March 31, 2022 and ~~royalty events at September 30,~~December 31, 2021, and concluded 0 such milestone payments were due.

The Company recorded research and development expense of ~~$2.3~~$2.3 million and ~~$1.9~~$1.8 million under ~~this agreement~~the DESRES Agreement for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020, respectively, and $6.2 and $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020,~~ respectively. ~~At September 30, 2021~~As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the Company had0 accrued expense balances to ~~D. E.~~D.E. Shaw Research ~~of approximately $0 and $1.5 million, respectively,~~ on its condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company had a prepaid ~~balance~~balances of ~~$6.7~~$2.1 million and $0$4.4 million for ~~D. E.~~D.E. Shaw Research as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020.~~ 2021, respectively.

Other Significant Arrangements

The Company has certain other research and license arrangements with third parties, which provide the Company with research services with the goal of identifying and developing product ~~candidates. The~~candidates, and the Company is obligated to pay certain development milestone payments ~~for up~~pursuant to ~~4 targets, each in the range of $4.0 to $7.0 million,~~these arrangements upon the achievement of certain specified contingent events. The Company assessed ~~the~~such milestones at ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, and concluded 0 such milestone payments were due. The Company incurred approximately ~~$1.5~~$1.0 million and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million of research and development expense under these agreements for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020, respectively, and $2.2 million and $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020,~~ respectively.

On May 26, 2021, the Company entered into a Lease (the “Lease”) with BMR-Hampshire, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Landlord”), for laboratory and office space located at 60 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts (the “Premises”). Under the terms of the Lease, the Company will lease approximately 41,474 square feet as the sole tenant at the Premises, which will supplement the Company’s current leased premises at 399 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Landlord will contribute an aggregate of $6.2 million toward the cost of construction and tenant improvements for the Premises. In total, fixed lease payments, which include base rent, landlord fees, and parking, are $55.7 million over the lease term. The Company’s obligation to pay rent under the Lease will start on a date set forth in an estimated construction schedule pursuant to the Lease or the date on which the Landlord tenders possession of the Premises to the Company with the tenant improvements substantially completed, whichever occurs later (the “Rent Commencement Date”). The term of the Lease is ten years following the Rent Commencement Date, which is currently expected in 2022. The Company did not control the space or any of the assets being constructed therein as of September 30, 2021 and further concluded the improvements being constructed therein are the landlord’s assets with alternative use to future tenants. As such, 0 right of use asset or lease liability was recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2021, since lease commencement, for accounting purposes, had not been triggered.10

~~The Company provided a letter of credit in connection with the Lease in the amount of $1.7 million with a financial institution, which expires August 31, 2033.~~

The Company continues to lease approximately 46,631 square feet of laboratory and office space at 399 Binney Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts that currently serves as the Company’s corporate headquarters under a facility lease agreement which has a term through April 2029, subject to certain renewal options.

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of ~~15,188,679 shares~~Financial Condition and Results of common stock, including the exercise in full of the underwriters’ option to purchase an additional 1,981,132 shares, at an offering price of $26.50 per share. The Company received estimated net proceeds of $381.9 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. As a result of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

We are a clinical-stage precision medicines company transforming the drug discovery process by combining leading-edge computational and experimental technologies with the goal of bringing life-changing therapies to patients. WeAs we believe we are among the first of a new breed of biotech created at the intersection of disparate ~~disciplines.~~technologies, we aim to push the boundaries of what’s possible in drug discovery. Our Dynamo™ platform integrates an array of leading-edge computational and experimental approaches designed to drug protein targets that have previously been ~~intractable, or inadequately addressed.~~intractable. Our initial focus is on enhancing small molecule therapeutic discovery in targeted oncology and genetic disease indications.

We are advancing a pipeline of medicines to address targets in precision oncology, including our lead product candidates, RLY-4008, RLY-2608 and RLY-1971.

While our initial focus is on precision oncology, we believe our Dynamo platform may also be broadly applied to other areas of precision medicine, such as genetic disease indications. In addition to the three product candidates described above, we have over five discovery stage programs across both precision oncology and genetic disease. We are focused on using the novel insights derived from our approach to transform the lives of patients suffering from debilitating and life-threatening diseases through the discovery, development and commercialization of our therapies.

We were incorporated in May 2015. We have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing our lead product candidates, developing our innovative computational and experimental approaches on protein motion, building our intellectual property portfolio, business planning, raising capital and providing general and administrative support for these operations. To date, we have principally financed our operations through private placements of preferred stock, convertible debt and proceeds from public offerings of our common stock. Additionally, in 2021, we received an aggregate of ~~$80.0~~$95.0 million in connection with the ~~Genentech Agreement.~~License Agreement with Genentech.

In October 2021, we completed a public offering, or the October 2021 Offering, of 15,188,679 shares of common stock, including the exercise in full of the underwriters’ option to purchase an additional 1,981,132 shares, at an offering price of $26.50 per share, for ~~estimated~~ net proceeds of ~~$381.9~~$382.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other ~~estimated~~ offering expenses. In July 2020, we closed our initial public offering, or IPO, and issued 23,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $20.00 per share for net proceeds of $425.3 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. Prior to our IPO, we had received gross proceeds of approximately $520.0 million from sales of our preferred stock and our issuance of convertible debt.

In ~~December 2020,~~August 2021, we entered into the ~~Genentech~~Discovery and Collaboration Agreement, or Collaboration Agreement, with ~~Genentech, for the development~~EQRx, Inc., or EQRx, to discover, develop, and ~~commercialization of RLY-1971.~~commercialize novel medicines against validated oncology targets. Under the terms of the ~~Genentech Agreement,~~agreement, we ~~received $75.0 million in an upfront payment in January 2021. In April 2021, we completed~~will be responsible for the ~~transfer~~discovery phase through to filing of the ~~IND~~ application for ~~RLY-1971~~an Investigational New Drug, or IND, while EQRx will be responsible for clinical development, regulatory and commercialization efforts of the product candidates developed pursuant to ~~Genentech upon which~~the collaboration. Subject to certain opt-out rights, we ~~received the associated milestone payment of $5.0 million in May 2021. We are eligible to receive an additional $20.0 million in near-term payments;~~ and ~~if we do not opt into a U.S. profit/cost~~EQRx will equally share ~~up to $695.0 million in additional development, commercialization and sales-based milestones for RLY-1971; and tiered~~

~~royalties on annual global net sales (on a country-by-country basis), anticipated to be~~ in the ~~low-to-mid-teens, subject to reductions in certain circumstances. Additionally, we are eligible to receive additional royalties in~~discovery, development and commercialization costs and the ~~event~~net profits from sales of ~~regulatory approval of RLY-1971 and Genentech’s compound, GDC-6036, that directly binds to and inhibits KRAS G12C, in combination.~~any collaboration medicines, if approved. We have the right to opt-in to a 50/50 U.S. profit/cost share and if we do opt into the U.S. profit/cost share, we are eligible to receive up to $410.0 million in additional commercialization and sales-based milestones for RLY-1971 outside of the U.S. and tiered royalties on annual net sales outside of the U.S. (on a country-by-country basis), anticipated to be in the low-to-mid-teens, subject to reduction in certain circumstances. We also retain the right to develop ~~RLY-1971~~any collaboration medicines in combination with our ~~FGFR2 and PI3Kα programs.~~wholly-owned pipeline.

On April 15, 2021, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement, and on April 22, 2021, we acquired ZebiAI Therapeutics, Inc., or ZebiAI. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we were required to pay ZebiAI’s former stockholders, option holders and warrant holders, or the ZebiAI Holders, upfront consideration in an aggregate amount of approximately $85.0 million, excluding customary purchase price adjustments, composed of approximately $20.0 million payable in cash and approximately $65.0 million payable in shares of our common stock. In addition, (i) the ZebiAI Holders will be eligible to receive up to an additional $85.0 million in milestone payments upon the achievement of certain platform or program-related milestones, payable in our common stock and (ii) we will pay to the ZebiAI Holders 10% of the payments we receive within three years of the closing date of the Merger Agreement from partnering, collaboration or other agreements related to ZebiAI’s platform up to an aggregate maximum amount of $100.0 million, payable in cash.

In ~~August 2021,~~December 2020, we entered into ~~a discovery collaboration agreement~~the License Agreement with ~~EQRx, Inc., or EQRx, to discover, develop,~~Genentech for the development and ~~commercialize novel medicines against validated oncology targets.~~commercialization of RLY-1971. Under the terms of the ~~agreement,~~License Agreement, we ~~will~~received $75.0 million in an upfront payment and $20.0 million in milestone payments from Genentech in 2021. We are eligible to receive an additional $5.0 million in near-term payments; and, if we do not opt into a U.S. profit/cost share, up to $695.0 million in additional development, commercialization and sales-based milestones for RLY-1971; and tiered royalties on annual global net sales (on a country-by-country basis), anticipated to be ~~responsible~~in the low-to-mid-teens, subject to reductions in certain circumstances. Additionally, we are eligible to receive additional royalties in the event of regulatory approval of RLY-1971 and Genentech’s compound, GDC-6036, that directly binds to and inhibits KRAS G12C, in combination. We have the right to opt-in to a 50/50 U.S. profit/cost share and if we do opt into the U.S. profit/cost share, we are eligible to receive up to $410.0 million in additional commercialization and sales-based milestones for ~~the discovery phase through to IND application filing, while EQRx will be responsible for clinical development, regulatory and commercialization efforts~~RLY-1971 outside of the ~~product candidates developed pursuant~~U.S. and tiered royalties on annual net sales outside of the U.S. (on a country-by-country basis), anticipated to ~~the collaboration. Subject to certain opt-out rights, we and EQRx will equally share~~be in the ~~discovery, development and commercialization costs and the net profits from sales of any collaboration medicines, if approved.~~low-to-mid-teens, subject to reduction in certain circumstances. We also retain the right to develop ~~any collaboration medicines~~RLY-1971 in combination with our ~~wholly-owned pipeline.~~FGFR2 and PI3Kα programs.

The ~~current~~ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has presented a substantial public health and economic challenge around the world and continues to affect our employees, patients, communities and business operations.

~~While~~ The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic may continue to affect our operations or those of our third-party partners, including our preclinical studies or clinical trial operations, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the severity and duration of additional variant outbreaks, vaccination rates where we ~~are currently continuing~~or our third party partners conduct operations, and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. The continued spread of COVID-19 globally could adversely impact our preclinical or clinical trial operations in the United States, including our ability to obtain slots for IND-enabling studies, recruit and retain patients, principal investigators and site staff in our clinical trials, ~~we have underway, we expect that COVID-19 precautions may directly or indirectly impact the timeline for some~~obtain sufficient clinical trial supply of our product candidates due to supply chain disruptions or interruptions in global shipping, as well as activate new clinical ~~trials.~~trial sites. To date, we have been able to continue to enroll our patients in first-in-human clinical trials for RLY-1971, RLY-4008, and ~~RLY-4008,~~RLY-2608, and we currently do not anticipate any interruptions in clinical ~~enrollment.~~enrollment or any material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, we are continuing to assess the potential impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on our current and future business and operations, including our expenses and clinical trials, as well as on our industry and the healthcare system. See “—The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our business and any future pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease could similarly affect our business and our financial results and could cause further disruption to the development of our product candidates” for a more detailed discussion of the risks related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Additionally, inflation generally affects us by increasing our employee-related costs and clinical trial expenses. Our financial condition and results of operations may also be impacted by other factors we may not be able to control, such as global supply chain disruptions, uncertain global economic conditions, global trade disputes or political instability as further discussed in the section “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report. We do not believe that such factors had a material adverse impact on our results of operations during the three month period ended March 31, 2022.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses on an aggregate basis. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current or future product candidates. Our net losses were ~~$296.4~~$62.0 million and ~~$87.7~~$42.2 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of ~~$700.6~~$830.1 million. These losses have resulted primarily from costs incurred in connection with research and development activities, licensing and patent investment and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses, including the costs of operating as a public company, and generate increasing operating losses for at least the next several years.

•

~~build out new facilities or expand existing facilities to support our ongoing development activity; and~~

•

add operational, financial and management information systems and personnel, including personnel to support our drug development, any future commercialization efforts and our operations as a public company.

•

In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our lead product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution.

As a result, we will need additional financing to support our continuing operations. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, which may include collaborations with third parties. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed, on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to raise capital or enter into such agreements as and when needed, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development or commercialization of one or more of our product candidates.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of increased expenses or when or if we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate revenue from product sales, we may not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations at planned levels and may be forced to reduce or terminate our operations.

We believe our cash, cash equivalents and investments of ~~$616.5~~$898.2 million as of ~~September 30, 2021, together with the net proceeds of $381.9 million from the October 2021 Offering,~~March 31, 2022, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into at least 2025. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. We will need to raise additional capital in the future to continue developing the drugs in our pipeline and to commercialize any approved drug. We may seek to obtain additional financing in the future through the issuance of our common stock, through other equity or debt financings or through collaborations or partnerships with other companies. We may not be able to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and any failure to raise capital as and when needed could compromise our ability to execute on our business plan.

Components of our Results of Operations

Revenue

~~Our~~To date, our revenue consists primarily of amounts related to the ~~Genentech Agreement.~~License Agreement with Genentech. We recognize our revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied under the agreement.

Operating Expenses

~~Our operating expenses since inception have consisted solely of research and development costs and general and administrative costs.~~

Research and Development ~~Expenses.~~Expenses

Research and development expenses include:

•

salaries, benefits and other employee related costs, including stock-based compensation expense, for personnel engaged in research and development functions;

•

costs of outside consultants, including their fees, stock-based compensation and related travel expenses;

•

expenses incurred under agreements with contract research organizations, or CROs, contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, and other vendors that conduct our clinical trials and preclinical activities;

•

costs of acquiring, developing and manufacturing clinical trial materials and lab supplies;

•

costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements; and

•

facility costs, depreciation and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, insurance and other supplies.

•

~~salaries, benefits and other employee related costs, including stock-based compensation expense, for personnel engaged in research and development functions;~~

•

~~costs of outside consultants, including their fees, stock-based compensation and related travel expenses;~~

•

~~costs of acquiring, developing and manufacturing clinical trial materials and lab supplies;~~

•

~~acquisition of in-process research and development assets that have no alternative future use;~~

•

~~costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements; and~~

•

~~facility costs, depreciation and other expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, insurance and other supplies.~~

We expense research and development costs as the services are performed or the goods are received. We recognize costs for certain development activities, such as clinical trials, based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using data such as patient enrollment, clinical site activations or other information provided to us by our vendors and our clinical investigative sites. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual agreements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected in our financial statements as prepaid expenses or accrued research and development expenses.

We began tracking external development costs by program on January 1, 2020 for programs that have entered clinical trials. We do not allocate internal costs, facilities costs or other overhead costs to specific programs. The following summarizes our costs based on their status in development:

Three Months
Ended September 30,
2021

Nine Months
Ended September 30,
2021

(in thousands)

External costs for programs in clinical trials

$
3,555

$
10,522

External costs for all programs in discovery and pre-clinical
studies

17,962

47,792

External costs for platform research and other research and
development activities

4,498

11,651

Employee related expenses

18,959

50,778

Total research and development expenses

$
44,974

$
120,743

Our most advanced development programs, RLY-1971, RLY-4008 and ~~RLY-4008,~~RLY-2608, are ~~enrolling patients~~ in first-in-human clinical trials. ~~Programs in~~We have over five discovery stage programs across both precision oncology and ~~pre-clinical stages include our RLY-2608 program as well as other earlier stage programs.~~genetic disease indications. Costs incurred for these programs include costs incurred to support our discovery research and translational science efforts up to the initiation of first-in-human clinical development. Platform research and other research and development activities include costs that are not specifically allocated to active product candidates, including facilities costs, depreciation expense and other costs. Employee related expenses includes salary, wages, stock-based compensation and other costs related to our personnel, which are not allocated to specific programs or activities.

We cannot determine with certainty the duration and costs of future clinical trials and future development costs, if, when or to what extent we will generate revenue from the commercialization and sale of any of our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval or our other research and development costs. We may never succeed in obtaining marketing approval for any of our product candidates.

The duration, costs and timing of clinical trials and development of our product candidates will depend on a variety of factors, including:

•

the scope, rate of progress, expense and results of our preclinical development activities, any future clinical trials of RLY-4008, RLY-2608 or other product candidates and other research and development activities that we may conduct;

•

uncertainties in clinical trial design and patient enrollment or drop out or discontinuation rates;

•

establishing an appropriate safety and efficacy profile with IND-enabling studies;

•

the initiation and completion of future clinical trial results;

•

the timing, receipt and terms of any approvals from applicable regulatory authorities including the FDA and non-U.S. regulators;

•

significant and changing government regulation and regulatory guidance;

•

potential additional studies requested by regulatory agencies;

•

establishing clinical and commercial manufacturing capabilities or making arrangements with third-party manufacturers in order to ensure that we or our third-party manufacturers are able to make product successfully;

•

the impact of any business interruptions to our operations, including the timing and enrollment of patients in our planned clinical trials, or to those of our manufacturers, suppliers or other vendors resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or a similar public health crisis or the changing political conditions such as the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and related global economic sanctions;

•

the expense of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and

•

maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of our product candidates following approval, if any, of our product candidates.

•

the scope, rate of progress, expense and results of our preclinical development activities, any future clinical trials of RLY-4008, our PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs, including RLY-2608, or other product candidates, and other research and development activities that we may conduct;

•

~~uncertainties in clinical trial design and patient enrollment or drop out or discontinuation rates;~~

•

~~establishing an appropriate safety and efficacy profile with IND-enabling studies;~~

•

~~the initiation and completion of future clinical trial results;~~

•

~~the timing, receipt and terms of any approvals from applicable regulatory authorities including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and non-U.S. regulators;~~

•

~~significant and changing government regulation and regulatory guidance;~~

•

~~potential additional studies requested by regulatory agencies;~~

•

~~the expense of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and~~

•

~~maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of our product candidates following approval, if any, of our product candidates.~~

Research and development activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect that our research and development expenses will continue to increase for the foreseeable future as we continue to conduct clinical trials of RLY-4008 ~~the development of our PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs, including~~and RLY-2608, ~~and to~~as well as identify and develop additional product candidates.

A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of a product candidate could mean a significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. For example, if the FDA or another regulatory authority were to require us to conduct clinical trials beyond those that we anticipate will be required for the completion of clinical development of a product candidate, or if we experience significant trial delays due to patient enrollment or other reasons, we would be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development.

19Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Liability

Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability consists of fluctuations in the estimated fair value of contingent milestone payments under the Merger Agreement with ZebiAI. In future periods, we expect the fair value of such contingent milestone payments to increase or decrease based on, among other things, our estimates of the probability of achieving and timing of the contingent milestone payments, as well as changes in market interest rates and the time value of money.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnel in our executive, finance, corporate and business development and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include legal fees relating to patent and corporate ~~matters,~~matters; professional fees for accounting, auditing, tax and consulting ~~services,~~services; other expenses associated with operating as a public company, including compliance with exchange listing and Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, requirements, director and officer insurance costs, and investor and public relations costs; travel ~~expenses~~expenses; and facility-related expenses, which include direct depreciation costs and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities and other operating costs.

We expect that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our general and administrative personnel headcount to support personnel in research and development and to support our operations generally as we increase our research and development activities and activities related to the potential commercialization of our product candidates. We also expect to incur increased expenses associated with operating as a public company, including costs of accounting, audit, legal, regulatory and tax-related services associated with maintaining compliance with exchange listing and Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, requirements, director and officer insurance costs and investor and public relations costs.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net primarily consists of interest income related to interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and investments.

Income Taxes

Since our inception in 2015, we have not recorded any U.S. federal or state income tax benefits for the net losses we have incurred in any year or for our earned research and development tax credits due to our uncertainty of realizing a benefit from those items.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Change
	2021			2020						Three Months Ended March 31,						Change
	(in thousands)									2022			2021
Revenue	$	666		$	—		$	666
										(in thousands)
License and other revenue										$	419		$	952		$	(533	)
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	44,974		$	24,376		$	20,598
Research and development expenses										$	51,667		$	30,622		$	21,045
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability		2,000			—			2,000			(4,595	)		—			(4,595	)
General and administrative		14,682			12,231			2,451
General and administrative expenses											16,068			12,735			3,333
Total operating expenses		61,656			36,607			25,049			63,140			43,357			19,783
Loss from operations		(60,990	)		(36,607	)		(24,383	)		(62,721	)		(42,405	)		(20,316	)
Other income, net		157			529			(372	)		675			221			454
Net loss	$	(60,833	)	$	(36,078	)	$	(24,755	)	$	(62,046	)	$	(42,184	)	$	(19,862	)

Revenue

We recognized revenue of approximately ~~$0.7~~$0.4 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease of $0.5 million was primarily related to revenue recognized upon the ~~Genentech Agreement and our progress on the related R&D services performance obligation. We did not recognize any revenue for~~transfer of active pharmaceutical ingredient during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021, for which no revenue was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2022.

Research and Development Expenses

The following summarizes our research and development expenses. We do not allocate certain internal costs, facilities, or overhead costs to specific development programs:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Change

2021

2020

(in thousands)

Employee related expenses

$
18,959

$
10,887

$
8,072

Outside and consulting services

16,510

7,642

8,868

Clinical trial expenses

3,555

2,101

1,454

Depreciation

807

750

57

Laboratory supplies and other costs

2,915

1,606

1,309

Facilities and other allocated expenses

2,228

1,390

838

Total research and development expenses

$
44,974

$
24,376

$
20,598


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2022		2021
	(in thousands)
External costs for programs in clinical trials	$	8,716	$	2,724	$	5,992
External costs for preclinical development candidates		17,421		12,806		4,615
Employee related expenses		21,083		11,730		9,353
Other expenses		4,447		3,362		1,085
Total research and development expenses	$	51,667	$	30,622	$	21,045

Research and development expenses were ~~$45.0~~$51.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022 compared to ~~$24.4~~$30.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. The increase of ~~$20.6~~$21.0 million was primarily due to ~~$8.9 million of additional outside and consulting services related to our pre-clinical candidates, $8.1~~$9.4 million of additional employee related costs due to increased headcount, including an increase in stock-based compensation of ~~$0.8~~$3.0 million, ~~$1.5~~$6.0 million ~~for~~related to additional clinical trial expenses, ~~associated with RLY-1971~~ and ~~RLY-4008, which both commenced in 2020, $1.3~~$4.6 million ~~of additional laboratory and other expenses and an additional $0.8 million of facilities and other allocated expenses.~~related to preclinical development candidates.

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Liability

The fair value of our contingent consideration liability for milestones under the Merger Agreement with ZebiAI ~~increased $2.0~~decreased by $4.6 million from ~~$43.5~~$50.3 million at ~~the acquisition date in April~~December 31, 2021 to ~~September 30, 2021.~~$45.7 million at March 31, 2022. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily attributable to changes in the ~~time~~assumptions underlying the fair value ~~of money.~~measurement between December 31, 2021 and March 31, 2022. There were no similar amounts in the prior period. In future periods, we expect the fair value of contingent consideration to increase or decrease based on, among other things, our estimates of the probability of achieving and the timing of the contingent milestone payments, as well as changes in market interest rates and the time value of money.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were ~~$14.7~~$16.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022 compared to ~~$12.2~~$12.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. The increase of ~~$2.5~~$3.3 million was primarily due to ~~$1.3 million of increased personnel costs and $0.7 million of other general and administrative expenses primarily attributed to an increase in consulting and professional fees.~~

~~Other Income, Net~~

Other income, net, was $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2021, compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease was primarily as a result of lower interest rates.

~~Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020~~

~~The following table summarizes our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2021:~~

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Change

2021

2020

(in thousands)

Revenue

$
2,462

$
—

$
2,462

Operating expenses:

Research and development

$
120,743

$
67,739

$
53,004

In-process research and development

123,000

—

123,000

Loss on initial consolidation of variable interest entity

11,855

—

11,855

Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability

2,000

—

2,000

General and administrative

41,839

23,045

18,794

Total operating expenses

299,437

90,784

208,653

Loss from operations

(296,975
)

(90,784
)

(206,191
)
Other income, net

559

3,096

(2,537
)
Net loss

$
(296,416
)

$
(87,688
)

$
(208,728
)

~~Revenue~~

We recognized revenue of approximately $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 primarily related to the Genentech Agreement including our progress on the R&D services performance obligation and our completion of the transfer of API to Genentech. We did not recognize any revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

~~Research and Development Expenses~~

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Change

2021

2020

(in thousands)

Employee related expenses

$
50,778

$
24,957

$
25,821

Outside and consulting services

43,811

26,372

17,439

Clinical trial expenses

10,522

4,853

5,669

Depreciation

2,292

2,181

111

Laboratory supplies and other costs

7,578

5,138

2,440

Facilities and other allocated expenses

5,762

4,238

1,524

Total research and development expenses

$
120,743

$
67,739

$
53,004

Research and development expenses were $120.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to $67.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase of $53.0 million was primarily due to $25.8$3.0 million of additional employee related costs due to increased headcount, including an increase in stock-based compensation expense of ~~$12.2 million, $17.4 million of additional outside and consulting services related to our pre-clinical candidates, $5.7~~$0.8 million.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net, was $0.7 million for ~~additional clinical trial expenses associated with RLY-1971 and RLY-4008, which both commenced in 2020, and $4.1~~the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to $0.2 million ~~of other research and development expenses, including lab, facilities and depreciation expenses.~~

~~In-process Research and Development Expenses~~

~~In-process research and development expenses of $123.0 million were recognized~~ for the ~~nine~~three months ended September 30, 2021 in connection with the in-process research and development asset acquired in connection with the asset acquisition of ZebiAI in the second quarter of 2021. No such expenses were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

~~Loss on Initial Consolidation of Variable Interest Entity~~

Loss on initial consolidation of variable interest entity of $11.9 million was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 in connection with the acquisition of ZebiAI in the second quarter of 2021. No such expenses were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

~~Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration Liability~~

The fair value of our contingent consideration liability for milestones under the Merger Agreement with ZebiAI increased $2.0 million from $43.5 million at the acquisition date in April 2021 to September 30,March 31, 2021. The increase was attributable to the time value of money. There were no similar amounts in the prior period. In future periods, we expect the fair value of contingent consideration to increase or decrease based on, among other things, our estimates of the probability of achieving and the timing of the contingent milestone payments, as well as changes in market interest rates and the time value of money.

~~General and Administrative Expenses~~

General and administrative expenses were $41.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to $23.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The increase of $18.8 million was primarily due to $13.3 million of increased personnel costs, including increased stock-based compensation of $8.6 million, to support our infrastructure and $5.5 million of other general and administrative expenses primarily attributed to an increase in insurance expense.

~~Other Income, Net~~

~~Other income, net, was $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, compared to $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The decrease was primarily as~~ a result of ~~lower~~changes in interest rates.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and have incurred significant operating losses. We have not yet commercialized any products and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any product candidates for several years, if ever. To

date, we have principally financed our operations through private placements of preferred stock, convertible debt and proceeds from public offerings of our common stock. In July 2020, we closed our IPO and issued 23,000,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $425.3 million. Prior to our IPO, we received gross proceeds of $520.0 million from sales of our preferred stock and our issuance of convertible debt. We received an upfront payment of $75.0 million from Genentech pursuant to the License Agreement with Genentech ~~Agreement~~ in January 2021 and ~~a $5.0~~$20.0 million in milestone ~~payment~~payments in ~~May~~ 2021. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments of ~~$616.5~~$898.2 million.

In August 2021, we filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3ASR with the SEC, or the 2021 Shelf, to register for sale an amount of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and/or units in one or more offerings, which became effective upon filing with the SEC (File No. 333-258768).

In August 2021, we entered into a sales agreement, or Sales Agreement, with Cowen and Company, LLC, or Cowen, pursuant to which we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having aggregate gross proceeds of up to $300.0 million from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings through Cowen, as our sales agent. We agreed to pay Cowen a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds of any shares sold by Cowen under the Sales Agreement. There have been no shares of our common stock sold under the Sales Agreement as of ~~September 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

In October 2021, we completed the October 2021 Offering of 15,188,679 shares of common stock, including the exercise in full of the underwriters’ option to purchase an additional 1,981,132 shares, at an offering price of $26.50 per share. We received ~~estimated~~ net proceeds of ~~$381.9~~$382.2 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other ~~estimated~~ offering expenses.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2021

2020

(in thousands)

Cash used in operating activities

$
(34,699
)

$
(67,217
)
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities

(186,766
)

158,092

Cash provided by financing activities

4,078

426,453

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash

$
(217,387
)

$
517,328

~~Operating Activities.~~


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021
	(in thousands)
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(49,173	)	$	46,640
Cash used in investing activities		(112,384	)		(233,621	)
Cash provided by financing activities		883			2,055
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	(160,674	)	$	(184,926	)

Operating Activities

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we used ~~$34.7~~$49.2 million of cash on operating activities, primarily resulting from our net loss of ~~$296.4~~$62.0 million, ~~partially~~ offset by non-cash charges of ~~$179.4~~$10.5 million and cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities of ~~$82.4~~$2.3 million. ~~Net~~

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, operating activities provided $46.6 million of cash, ~~provided by~~primarily resulting from changes in our operating assets and liabilities of ~~$82.4~~$78.1 million, during this period consisted primarily of a decrease of $74.3 million in accounts receivable attributable to the collection of the up-front payment due from Genentech, an increase of $13.1 million in accrued expenses as a result of an increase in operating expenses, an increase of $7.1 million in prepaid expenses and other assets and a decrease of $3.4 million in contract asset, offset ~~in part~~ by ~~a decrease of $1.5 million in accounts payable.~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, we used $67.2 million of cash on operating activities, resulting from~~ our net loss ~~of $87.7 million, partially offset by~~excluding non-cash charges of ~~$19.6 million and cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $0.9~~$31.5 million. Net cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $0.9 million during this period consisted primarily of changes in prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses as a result of an increase in operating expenses and the timing of payments related to our research arrangements and insurance.

Investing ~~Activities.~~Activities

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, investing activities used ~~$186.8~~$112.4 million of cash, consisting of ~~$159.0~~$109.6 million of net purchases of investments ~~$25.2 million related to cash paid for the acquisition of ZebiAI~~ and ~~$2.6~~$2.8 million for the acquisition of property and equipment.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, investing activities ~~provided $158.1~~used $233.6 million of cash, consisting of ~~$160.0~~$233.1 million of net investment maturities, partially offset by ~~$1.9~~$0.5 million for the acquisition of property and equipment.

Financing ~~Activities.~~Activities

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was ~~$4.1~~$0.9 million, consisting of net proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2020,~~March 31, 2021, net cash provided by financing activities was ~~$426.5~~$2.1 million, consisting ~~primarily~~ of net proceeds from the ~~issuance~~exercise of ~~common~~ stock ~~upon completion of our IPO.~~options.

Funding Requirements

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing clinical development activities related to the potential clinical development activities of RLY-4008 and RLY-2608 and the ongoing ~~pre-clinical~~preclinical development activities of our ~~PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs.~~PI3Ka program. In addition, we are now incurring additional costs associated with operating as a public company. We expect that our expenses will increase substantially as discussed in more detail in “~~—Overview~~¾” Overview” above.

~~We believe our~~As of March 31, 2022, we had cash, cash equivalents and investments of ~~$616.5 million as of September 30, 2021, together with the net proceeds of $381.9 million from the October 2021 Offering,~~$898.2 million. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into at least 2025. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect.

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development of RLY-4008, ~~our PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs, including~~ RLY-2608 and our other product candidates and programs, and because the extent to which we may enter into collaborations with third parties for the development of our product candidates is unknown, we are unable to estimate the timing and amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses associated with completing the research and development of our product candidates. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

•

the impact of any business interruptions to our operations, including the timing and enrollment of patients in our planned clinical trials, or to those of our manufacturers, suppliers or other vendors, resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or similar public health crisis or the changing political conditions such as the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and related global economic sanctions;

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of our current and future clinical trials of RLY-4008 and RLY-2608 and additional preclinical research of our PI3Ka programs;

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of drug discovery, preclinical research and clinical trials for our other product candidates;

•

the number of future product candidates that we pursue and their development requirements;

•

the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;

•

our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;

•

the success of any existing or future collaborations that we may enter into with third parties;

•

the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products and technologies, including entering into licensing or collaboration arrangements for product candidates, such as our collaboration with Genentech;

•

the achievement of milestones or occurrence of other developments that trigger payments under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;

•

the extent to which we are obligated to reimburse, or entitled to reimbursement of, clinical trial costs under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;

•

the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including drug sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval, to the extent that such sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution are not the responsibility of any collaborator that we may have at such time;

•

the amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval;

•

the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;

•

our headcount growth and associated costs as we expand our business operations and our research and development activities; and

•

the costs of operating as a public company.

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of our current and future clinical trials of RLY-4008 and future clinical trials of RLY-2608 and additional preclinical research of our PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs;

•

~~the scope, progress, results and costs of drug discovery, preclinical research and clinical trials for our other product candidates;~~

•

~~the number of future product candidates that we pursue and their development requirements;~~

•

~~the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;~~

•

~~our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;~~

•

~~the success of any existing or future collaborations that we may enter into with third parties;~~

•

~~the achievement of milestones or occurrence of other developments that trigger payments under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;~~

•

~~the extent to which we are obligated to reimburse, or entitled to reimbursement of, clinical trial costs under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;~~

•

~~the amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval;~~

•

~~the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;~~

•

~~our headcount growth and associated costs as we expand our business operations and our research and development activities; and~~

•

~~the costs of operating as a public company.~~

Developing pharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval for any product candidates or generate revenue from the sale of any product candidate for which we may obtain marketing approval. In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of drugs that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if ever. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funds to achieve our business objectives.

Adequate additional funds may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. We do not currently have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest may be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences and anti-dilution protections that could adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Additional debt or preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants that may limit our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring debt, making capital

expenditures or declaring dividends, which could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business, and may require the issuance of warrants, which could potentially dilute your ownership interest.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technology, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce and/or terminate our product development programs or any future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

There were no material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments during the ~~nine~~three months ended September 30, 2021, except for the lease commitment at 60 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, MA disclosed in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.March 31, 2022. For more information on our contractual obligations and commitments, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and Note ~~10,~~8, Commitments and Contingencies, of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, costs and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The full extent to which the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will directly or indirectly impact our business, results of operations and financial condition, including expenses, clinical trials and research and development costs, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain, including as a result of new information that may emerge concerning COVID-19 and the actions taken to contain or treat COVID-19, as well as the economic impact on local, regional, national and international markets. We have made estimates of the impact of

COVID-19 within our financial statements and there may be changes to those estimates in future periods. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

For a discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 filed with the SEC on ~~March 25, 2021,~~February 24, 2022, the notes to our audited financial statements appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes to the financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no material changes to these critical accounting policies and estimates through ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 from those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020, except as discussed below.~~2021.

~~Acquisition Accounting~~

We are required to make significant judgments and estimates to determine whether an acquisition constitutes an acquisition of a business or assets. For asset acquisitions, this includes whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. We are also required to make several significant judgments and estimates in order to determine the total consideration transferred for the asset acquisition and then allocate it to the assets that we have acquired and the liabilities that we have assumed on our consolidated balance sheet. The most significant judgments and estimates typically relate to the fair value of the in-process research and development, or IPR&D, and the fair value of certain contingent payments related to the acquisition. We are also required to reassess the fair value of the Contingent Milestone Payments on a quarterly basis, which requires similar judgments and estimates. Changes in the fair value of certain contingent payments can result from changes to one or multiple inputs, including adjustments to the probability of achievement and timing of the contingent payments, and changes to the applicable discount rates. Significant judgment is used in determining these assumptions during each reporting period. Reasonable changes in these assumptions can cause material changes to the fair value of our contingent consideration liability.

~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements~~

~~We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.~~

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that ~~may potentially impact our financial position and results of operations~~we have adopted is disclosed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in ~~Part I, Item 1 of~~ this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. None of these pronouncements had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

~~Item 3.~~

~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.~~

Interest rate risk

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates of our investment portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our cash equivalents consisted of money market funds. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our investments consisted of investments in U.S. treasury bills and United States agency securities that have contractual maturities of less than two years. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. The fair value of our marketable securities is subject to change as a result of potential changes in market interest rates, including changes ~~resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.~~in federal interest rates. The potential change in fair value for interest rate sensitive instruments has been assessed on a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse movement across all maturities. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we estimate that such hypothetical 100 basis point adverse movement would not result in a material impact on our condensed consolidated results of operations.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had no debt outstanding and are therefore not exposed to interest rate risk with respect to debt.

Foreign currency exchange risk

All of our employees and our operations are currently located in the United States and our expenses are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. However, we have entered into a limited number of contracts with vendors for research and development services that permit us to satisfy our payment obligations in U.S. dollars (at prevailing exchange rates) but have underlying payment obligations denominated in foreign currencies, including the Euro. We are subject to foreign currency transaction gains or losses on our contracts denominated in foreign currencies. To date, foreign currency transaction gains and losses have not been material to our financial statements and we have not had a formal hedging program with respect to foreign currency. We estimate that a 10% increase or decrease in current exchange rates would not have a material effect on our financial results for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022. While we have not engaged in the hedging of our foreign currency transactions to date, we are evaluating the costs and benefits of initiating such a program and may in the future hedge selected significant transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar as we expand our international operations and our risk grows.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

~~Item 4.~~

~~Controls and Procedures.~~

We have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer (our Chief Executive Officer) and principal financial officer (our ~~Senior Vice President, Finance)~~Chief Financial Officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Senior Vice President, Finance,~~Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Senior Vice President, Finance~~Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

As a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, many of our employees are working remotely. We have not identified any material changes in our internal control over financial reporting as a result of these changes to the working environment, in part because our internal control over financial reporting was designed to operate in a remote working environment. We are continually monitoring and assessing the COVID-19 situation to determine any potential impacts on the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

~~Item 1.~~

~~Legal Proceedings.~~

From time to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings. While the outcome of any such proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, as of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we were not a party to any litigation or legal proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, are probable to have a material adverse effect on our business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~Item 1A.~~

~~Risk Factors.~~

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” before deciding whether to invest in our common stock. We believe the risks described below include risks that are material to us as well as other risks that may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. In such an event, the market price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects and could result in a complete loss of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Product Candidates

Risks Related to Clinical Development

We have never successfully completed any clinical trials, and we may be unable to do so for any product candidates we develop.

We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete any clinical trials, including large-scale, pivotal clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. We have ~~two~~three product candidates, RLY-1971, RLY-4008 and ~~RLY-4008,~~RLY-2608, in first-in-human clinical development. ~~For RLY-2608, we initiated IND-enabling studies in 2021 and plan to initiate a first-in-human clinical study in the first half of 2022.~~ We may not be able to file ~~such IND or~~ INDs for any of our other product candidates on the timelines we expect, if at all. For example, we may experience manufacturing delays with IND-enabling studies. Moreover, we cannot be sure that once we have submitted an IND, the FDA will allow further clinical trials to begin, or that, once begun, issues will not arise that require us to suspend or terminate clinical trials. The FDA or other regulatory authorities may impose a clinical hold before or after a trial begins for a number of reasons outlined in FDA regulations, including if the FDA believes the study drug raises a significant risk of illness or injury. If the FDA imposes a clinical hold, trials may not commence or recommence without FDA authorization and then only under terms authorized by the FDA. Accordingly, the submission of an IND does not mean the FDA will allow clinical trials to begin and, if and when clinical trials do commence under an active IND, issues may arise that require suspension or termination of such trials. Further, commencing each of these clinical trials is subject to finalizing the trial design based on discussions with the FDA and other regulatory authorities. Any guidance we receive from the FDA or other regulatory authorities is subject to change. Regulatory authorities could change their position, including, on the acceptability of our trial designs or the clinical endpoints selected, which may require us to complete additional clinical trials or impose stricter approval conditions than we currently expect. Successful completion of our clinical trials is a prerequisite to submitting a new drug application, or NDA, to the FDA and a Marketing Authorization Application, or MAA, to the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, for each product candidate and, consequently, the ultimate approval and commercial marketing of each product candidate. Our RLY-1971, RLY-4008 and ~~RLY-4008~~RLY-2608 first-in-human clinical trials are ongoing, but we do not know whether any of our future clinical trials ~~including the planned first-in-human clinical trial for RLY-2608,~~ will begin on time or ever be completed on schedule, if at all.

If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may:

•

be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates;

•

not obtain marketing approval at all;

•

obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired;

•

be subject to post-marketing testing requirements; or

•

have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval.

•

~~be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates;~~

•

~~not obtain marketing approval at all;~~

•

~~obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired;~~

•

~~be subject to post-marketing testing requirements; or~~

•

~~have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval.~~

Clinical product development involves a lengthy and expensive process, with an uncertain outcome.

It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will prove effective and safe in humans or will receive regulatory approval. Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any product candidate, we must complete

preclinical studies and then conduct ~~extensive~~the required clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of preclinical development testing and early clinical trials may

not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical and other nonclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their product candidates. Our preclinical and other nonclinical studies and future clinical trials may not be successful.

From time to time, we may publish interim top-line or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as ~~patient enrollment continues~~more participants enroll and ~~more patient~~as data ~~become available.~~mature. Preliminary or top-line data also remain subject to ~~audit~~cleaning and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse differences between preliminary or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.

We may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our product candidates.

We may experience delays in completing our preclinical studies and initiating or completing clinical trials, and we may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, any future clinical trials that we could conduct that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:

•

regulators or institutional review boards, or IRBs, or ethics committees may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;

•

we may experience delays in reaching, or fail to reach, agreement on acceptable terms with prospective trial sites and prospective contract research organizations, or CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;

•

existing clinical trial sites may drop out of the clinical trial, which may require that we add new clinical trial sites or investigators;

•

clinical trials of our product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials or we may decide to abandon product development programs;

•

the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, or participants may drop out of these clinical trials or fail to return for post-treatment follow-up at a higher rate than we anticipate;

•

our third party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all, or may deviate from the clinical trial protocol;

•

we may elect to, or regulators or IRBs or ethics committees may require us or our investigators to, suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks;

•

the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;

•

we may not be able to adequately project the timing and quantity of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of our product candidates or the supply or quality of these materials may be insufficient or inadequate; and

•

our product candidates may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics, causing us or our investigators, regulators or IRBs or ethics committees to suspend or terminate the clinical trials, or reports may arise from nonclinical studies or clinical testing of other cancer therapies that raise safety or efficacy concerns about our product candidates.

•

~~regulators or institutional review boards, or IRBs, or ethics committees may not authorize us or our investigators to commence a clinical trial or conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site;~~

•

clinical trials of our product candidates may produce negative or inconclusive results, and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional preclinical studies or clinical trials or we may decide to abandon product development programs;

•

our third party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all, or may deviate from the clinical trial protocol or drop out of the trial, which may require that we add new clinical trial sites or investigators;

•

~~the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate;~~

•

our product candidates may have undesirable side effects or other unexpected characteristics, causing us or our investigators, regulators or IRBs or ethics committees to suspend or terminate the trials, or reports may arise from preclinical or clinical testing of other cancer therapies that raise safety or efficacy concerns about our product candidates.

We could encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by the IRBs of the institutions at which such trials are being conducted, by the Data Safety Monitoring Board, or DSMB, for such trial or by the FDA or other regulatory authorities. Such authorities may impose such a suspension or termination or clinical hold due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements or our clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or clinical trial site by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a product, changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial. Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates. Further, the FDA may disagree with our clinical trial design and our interpretation of data from clinical trials, or may change the requirements for approval even after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical trials.

Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or regulatory approvals. We do not know whether any of our future clinical trials will begin as planned, or whether any of our current or future clinical trials will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Significant preclinical study or clinical trial delays, including those caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations. Any delays in our preclinical or current or future clinical development programs may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. In particular, because we will be deploying our drug discovery platform across a broad target space, our ability to enroll eligible patients may be limited or may result in slower enrollment than we anticipate. In addition, some of our competitors have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that treat the same indications as our product candidates, and patients who would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead enroll in clinical trials of our competitors’ product candidates. Furthermore, our ability to enroll patients may be significantly delayed by the ~~evolving~~ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and we do not know the extent and scope of such delays at this point.

In addition to the competitive clinical trial environment, the eligibility criteria of our planned clinical trials will further limit the pool of available study participants as we will require that patients have specific characteristics that we can measure to assure their cancer is either severe enough or not too advanced to include them in a study. Additionally, the process of finding patients may prove costly. We also may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient number of patients to complete our clinical studies because of the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidates under study, the availability and efficacy of competing therapies and clinical trials, the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients, and the patient referral practices of physicians. If patients are unwilling to participate in our studies for any reason, the timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining regulatory approval of potential products may be delayed.

We may also engage third parties to develop companion diagnostics for use in our clinical trials, but such third parties may not be successful in developing such companion diagnostics, furthering the difficulty in identifying patients with the targeted genetic mutations for our clinical trials. Further, if we are required to develop companion diagnostics and are unable to include patients with the targeted genetic mutations, this could compromise our ability to seek participation in the FDA’s expedited review and development programs, including Breakthrough Therapy Designation and Fast Track Designation, or otherwise to seek to accelerate clinical development and regulatory timelines. The FDA has indicated that if we continue RLY-4008 and RLY-2608 in a specific biomarker-defined population, a companion diagnostic device will be required to ensure ~~its~~their safe and effective use.

~~Patient~~Clinical trial enrollment may be affected by other factors including:

•

the severity of the disease under investigation;

•

the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial in question;

•

the availability of an appropriate genomic screening test;

•

the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;

•

the efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;

•

the availability of approved products that treat the same indications as our product candidates;

•

the patient referral practices of physicians;

•

the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment;

•

the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients; and

•

factors we may not be able to control, such as uncertain geopolitical conditions or current or potential pandemics that may limit patients, principal investigators or staff or clinical site availability (e.g., complications due to the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine or the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic).

•

~~the severity of the disease under investigation;~~

•

~~the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial in question;~~

•

~~the availability of an appropriate genomic screening test;~~

•

~~the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;~~

•

~~the efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;~~

•

~~the availability of approved products that treat the same indications as our product candidates;~~

•

~~the patient referral practices of physicians;~~

•

~~the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment;~~

•

~~the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients; and~~

•

~~factors we may not be able to control, such as current or potential pandemics that may limit patients, principal investigators or staff or clinical site availability (e.g., outbreak of COVID-19).~~

Positive data from preclinical or early clinical studies of our product candidates are not necessarily predictive of the results of later clinical studies and any future clinical trials of our product candidates. If we cannot replicate the positive data from our preclinical or early clinical studies of our product candidates in our future clinical trials, we will be unable to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates.

Any positive data from our preclinical or early clinical studies of our product candidates may not necessarily be predictive of the results of later clinical studies and any future clinical trials of our product candidates. Similarly, even if we are able to complete our planned preclinical and clinical studies or any future clinical trials of our product candidates according to our current development timeline, the positive data from such preclinical or early clinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates may not be replicated in subsequent ~~preclinical~~nonclinical studies or clinical trial results.

Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials after achieving positive results in early-stage development and we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. These setbacks have been caused by, among other things, preclinical and other nonclinical findings made while clinical trials were underway, or safety or efficacy observations made in preclinical studies and clinical trials, including previously unreported adverse events. Moreover, preclinical, other nonclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses and many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials nonetheless failed to obtain FDA, EMA or ~~EMA~~other regulatory authority approval.

Our current or future clinical trials or those of our future collaborators may reveal significant adverse events not seen in our preclinical or other nonclinical studies or early clinical data and may result in a safety profile that would inhibit regulatory approval or market acceptance of any of our product candidates.

Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any products, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive preclinical or other nonclinical studies and clinical trials that our product candidates are both safe and effective for use in each target indication. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. The results of preclinical or other nonclinical studies and early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. In addition, initial success in clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained when such trials are completed. There is typically an extremely high rate of attrition from the failure of product candidates proceeding through clinical trials. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials also may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy profile despite having progressed through preclinical or other nonclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies in the biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or unacceptable safety issues, notwithstanding promising results in earlier trials. Most product candidates that commence clinical trials are never approved as products and there can be no assurance that any of our current or future clinical trials will ultimately be successful or support further clinical development of any of our product candidates.

We may develop future product candidates, in combination with one or more cancer therapies. The uncertainty resulting from the use of our product candidates in combination with other cancer therapies may make it difficult to accurately predict side effects in future clinical trials.

As is the case with many treatments for cancer and rare diseases, it is likely that there may be side effects associated with the use of our product candidates. If significant adverse events or other side effects are observed in any of our current or future clinical trials, we may have difficulty recruiting patients to our clinical trials, patients may drop out of our clinical trials, or we may be required to abandon the clinical trials or our development efforts of one or more product candidates altogether. We, the FDA or other applicable regulatory authorities, or an IRB may suspend or terminate clinical trials of a product candidate at any time for various reasons, including a belief that subjects in such trials are being exposed to unacceptable health risks or adverse side effects. Some potential therapeutics developed in the biotechnology industry that initially showed therapeutic promise in early-stage clinical trials have later been found to cause side effects that prevented their further development. Even if the side effects do not preclude the product from obtaining or maintaining marketing approval, undesirable side effects may inhibit market acceptance of the approved product due to its tolerability versus other therapies. Any of these developments could materially harm our business, financial condition and prospects.

Although we intend to explore other therapeutic opportunities, in addition to the product candidates that we are currently developing, we may fail to identify viable new product candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons. If we fail to identify additional potential product candidates, our business could be materially harmed.

Research programs to pursue the development of our existing and planned product candidates for additional indications and to identify new product candidates and disease targets require substantial technical, financial and human resources whether or not they are ultimately successful. For example, pursuant to the DESRES Agreement, we collaborate with D. E. Shaw Research to develop various protein models and make predictions as to how molecules might move, with subsequent validation efforts in our and our CROs’ labs. There can be no assurance that we will find potential additional targets using this approach, that any such targets will be tractable, or that such clinical validations will be successful. Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential indications and/or product candidates, yet fail to yield results for clinical development for a number of reasons, including:

•

the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential indications and/or product candidates;

•

potential product candidates may, after further study, be shown to have harmful adverse effects or other characteristics that indicate they are unlikely to be effective products; or

•

it may take greater human and financial resources than we will possess to identify additional therapeutic opportunities for our product candidates or to develop suitable potential product candidates through internal research programs, thereby limiting our ability to develop, diversify and expand our product portfolio.

•

~~the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying potential indications and/or product candidates;~~

•

~~potential product candidates may, after further study, be shown to have harmful adverse effects or other characteristics that indicate they are unlikely to be effective products; or~~

•

Because we have limited financial and human resources, we intend to initially focus on research programs and product candidates for a limited set of indications. As a result, we may forgo or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential or a greater likelihood of success. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities.

Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will ever be able to identify additional therapeutic opportunities for our product candidates or to develop suitable potential product candidates through internal research programs, which could materially adversely affect our future growth and prospects. We may focus our efforts and resources on potential product candidates or other potential programs that ultimately prove to be unsuccessful.

We intend to develop our current product candidates and potentially future product candidates, in combination with other therapies, which exposes us to additional risks.

We intend to develop our current product candidates, and may develop future product candidates, for use in combination with one or more currently approved cancer therapies. Even if any product candidate we develop was to receive marketing approval or be commercialized for use in combination with other existing therapies, we would continue to bear the risks that the FDA or similar ~~foreign~~ regulatory authorities could revoke approval of the therapy used in combination with our product candidate or that safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing therapies. Combination therapies are commonly used for the treatment of cancer, and we would be subject to similar risks if we develop any of our product candidates for use in combination with other drugs or for indications other than cancer. This could result in our own products being removed from the market or being less successful commercially.

We may also evaluate our current product candidates or any other future product candidates in combination with one or more other cancer therapies that have not yet been approved for marketing by the FDA or similar ~~foreign~~ regulatory authorities. We will not be able to market and sell our SHP2 program, ~~our~~ FGFR2 program, or ~~our~~ PI3K program or any product candidate we develop in combination with any such unapproved cancer therapies that do not ultimately obtain marketing approval. Pursuant to the License Agreement with Genentech, ~~Agreement,~~ as further described above, Genentech will assume the development of RLY-1971, including developing RLY-1971 in combination with Genentech’s KRAS ^G12C program.

If the FDA or similar ~~foreign~~ regulatory authorities do not approve these other drugs or revoke their approval of, or if safety, efficacy, manufacturing, or supply issues arise with, the drugs we choose to evaluate in combination with our current product candidates or any product candidate we develop, we may be unable to obtain approval of or market our SHP2 program, ~~our~~ FGFR2 program, or ~~our~~ PI3K program or any product candidate we develop.

Our product candidates utilize a novel mechanism of action and novel binding locations, which may result in greater research and development expenses, regulatory issues that could delay or prevent approval, or discovery of unknown or unanticipated adverse effects.

Our product candidates utilize novel mechanisms of action and novel binding locations, which may result in greater research and development expenses, regulatory issues that could delay or prevent approval, or discovery of unknown or unanticipated adverse effects. Our Dynamo platform uses advanced computational models in tight integration with our medicinal chemistry, structural biology, enzymology and biophysics capabilities to predict and design the compounds that will achieve the most desirable characteristics, including potency, selectivity, bioavailability, and drug-like properties. A disruption in any of these capabilities may have significant adverse effects in our abilities to expand our Dynamo platform, and we cannot predict whether we will continue to have access to these capabilities in the future to support our Dynamo platform. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to rapidly identify, design and synthesize the necessary compounds or that these or other problems related to the development of this novel mechanism will not arise in the future, which may cause significant delays, or we raise problems we may not be able to resolve.

Regulatory approval of novel product candidates such as ours can be more expensive, riskier and take longer than for other, more well-known or extensively studied pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical product candidates due to our and regulatory agencies’ lack of experience with them. The novelty of our mechanism of action may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to conduct additional studies or clinical trials, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. The novel mechanism of action also means that fewer people are trained in or experienced with product candidates of this type, which may make it more difficult to find, hire and retain personnel for research, development and manufacturing positions. Because our inhibitors utilize a novel mechanism of action that has not been the subject of extensive study compared to more well-known product candidates, there is also

an increased risk that we may discover previously unknown or unanticipated adverse effects during our preclinical or other nonclinical studies and clinical trials. Any such events could adversely impact our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We are conducting, or have filed clinical trial applications to conduct, clinical trials for our product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and similar foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials.

We are conducting, or have filed clinical trial applications to conduct, additional clinical trials outside the United States, including in Australia, the United Kingdom, Europe and Asia and may conduct, or file clinical trial applications to conduct, additional clinical trials in other foreign jurisdictions in the future. The acceptance of trial data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States by the FDA may be subject to certain conditions. In cases where data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States are intended to serve as the sole basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the United States population and United States medical practice; (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any similar foreign regulatory authority will accept data from clinical trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any similar foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional clinical trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our

business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

Risks Related to Obtaining Regulatory Approvals

If we are not able to obtain, or if delays occur in obtaining, required regulatory approvals for our product candidates, we will not be able to commercialize, or will be delayed in commercializing, our product candidates, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.

Our product candidates and the activities associated with their development and commercialization, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution, import and export are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States and by ~~comparable~~similar authorities in other countries. Before we can commercialize any of our product candidates, we must obtain marketing approval. Currently, all of our product candidates are in development, and we have not received approval to market any of our product candidates from regulatory authorities in any jurisdiction. It is possible that our product candidates, including any product candidates we may seek to develop in the future, will never obtain regulatory approval. We have only limited experience in filing and supporting the applications necessary to gain regulatory approvals and expect to rely on third-party CROs and/or regulatory consultants to assist us in this process. Securing regulatory approval requires the submission of extensive ~~preclinical~~nonclinical and clinical data and supporting information to the various regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy. Securing regulatory approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the relevant regulatory authority. Our product candidates may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use. In addition, regulatory authorities may find fault with our manufacturing process or facilities or that of third-party contract manufacturers. We may also face greater than expected difficulty in manufacturing our product candidates.

The process of obtaining regulatory approvals, both in the United States and abroad, is expensive and often takes many years. If the FDA or a ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authority requires that we perform additional ~~preclinical~~nonclinical studies or clinical trials, approval, if obtained at all, may be delayed. The length of such a delay varies substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in regulatory review for each submitted NDA, 510(k), premarket approval application, or PMA, or equivalent application types, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. The FDA and ~~comparable~~similar authorities in other countries have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require additional ~~preclinical,~~nonclinical, clinical or other studies. Our product candidates could be delayed in receiving, or fail to receive, regulatory approval for many reasons, including the following:

•

the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;

•

we may not be able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical studies;

•

we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication or a related companion diagnostic is suitable to identify appropriate patient populations;

•

the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities for approval;

•

we may be unable to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;

•

the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from nonclinical studies or clinical trials;

•

the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to support the submission of an NDA or other submission or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere;

•

the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities may find deficiencies with or fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; and

•

the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or similar foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change such that our clinical data are insufficient for approval.

•

~~the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with the design or implementation of our clinical trials;~~

•

~~we may not be able to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical studies;~~

•

we may be unable to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities that a product candidate is safe and effective for its proposed indication or a related companion diagnostic is suitable to identify appropriate patient populations;

•

~~the results of clinical trials may not meet the level of statistical significance required by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities for approval;~~

•

~~we may be unable to demonstrate that a product candidate’s clinical and other benefits outweigh its safety risks;~~

•

~~the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;~~

•

the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may find deficiencies with or fail to approve the manufacturing processes or facilities of third-party manufacturers with which we contract for clinical and commercial supplies; and

•

~~the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change such that our clinical data are insufficient for approval.~~

Even if we were to obtain approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, thereby narrowing the commercial potential of the product candidate. In addition, regulatory authorities may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates.

If we experience delays in obtaining approval or if we fail to obtain approval of our product candidates, the commercial prospects for our product candidates may be harmed and our ability to generate revenues will be materially impaired.

Risks Related to Commercialization

The incidence and prevalence for target patient populations of our product candidates have not been established with precision. If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we estimate or if any approval that we obtain is based on a narrower definition of the patient population, our revenue and ability to achieve profitability will be adversely affected, possibly materially.

We are currently evaluating the safety and tolerability of RLY-1971 in a Phase 1 dose ~~escalation~~escalation/dose expansion study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors and pursuant to the License Agreement with Genentech ~~Agreement~~ entered into in December 2020, future development for RLY-1971, including the potential to conduct multiple combination studies, ~~will be~~is governed by a joint development team between us and Genentech. In July 2021, Genentech initiated the cohort of RLY-1971 in combination with GDC-6036, its KRAS G12C inhibitor, in a Phase 1b trial.We estimate there are approximately ~~55,000 late-line~~38,000 patients annually in the United States with advanced lung cancer or colorectal cancer who might benefit from a combination of RLY-1971 with another targeted inhibitor. In the future, if RLY-1971 advances to earlier lines of combination treatment for lung cancer or colorectal cancer, we believe it could be applied in the treatment of approximately ~~90,000~~70,000 patients annually in the United States. The subset of patients with KRAS ^G12C mutations in lung cancer ~~that~~and colorectal cancer who could potentially benefit from the combination of RLY-1971 with GDC-6036 is approximately ~~15,000-25,000~~17,000 to 32,000 annually in the United States.

We are also evaluating the safety and tolerability of RLY-4008, our inhibitor of FGFR2 in patients with advanced solid tumors having oncogenic FGFR2 alterations, in a first-in-human trial initiated in September 2020. We believe FGFR2-mediated cancers affect approximately 8,000 late-line patients annually in the United ~~States, of which fusions represent approximately 2,700, amplifications 1,600, and mutations 3,800.~~States. In the future, if RLY-4008 advances to earlier lines of treatment, it could potentially address approximately 20,000 patients annually in the United States.

~~We have initiated IND-enabling studies~~In December 2021, we dosed the first patient in a first-in-human clinical trial for RLY-2608, the first known allosteric, pan-mutant (H1047X, E542X and E545X) and isoform-selective PI3Kα inhibitor in ~~2021.~~clinical development. We believe ~~PI3Kα H1047X mutant cancers affect approximately 10,000 late-line patients annually in~~RLY-2608 has the ~~United States. In the future, if RLY-2608 advances~~potential to ~~earlier lines of treatment, it could potentially~~ address approximately 50,000 to 156,000 patients ~~annually in the United States.RLY-2608 also potently inhibits E542X and E545X. We estimate there are approximately 15,000 late-line and 60,000 total patients annually~~per year in the United States, ~~who might benefit from~~one of the largest patient populations for a ~~PI3Kα targeted inhibitor that targets the mutations at E542 and E545.~~ precision oncology medicine.

Our projections of both the number of people who have these diseases, as well as the subset of people with these diseases who have the potential to benefit from treatment with RLY-1971, RLY-4008 or RLY-2608 ~~program~~ or other product candidates, are based on estimates.

The total addressable market opportunity will ultimately depend upon, among other things, the diagnosis criteria included in the final label, if our product candidates are approved for sale for these indications, acceptance by the medical community and patient access, product pricing and reimbursement. The number of patients with cancers and solid tumors may turn out to be lower than expected, patients may not be otherwise amenable to treatment with our products, or new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, all of which would adversely affect our results of operations and our business. We may not be successful in our efforts to identify additional product candidates. Due to our limited resources and access to capital, we must prioritize development of certain product candidates, which may prove to be the wrong choice and may adversely affect our business.

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.

The development and commercialization of new products in the biopharmaceutical and related industries is highly competitive. We compete in the segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and other related markets that address computationally focused structure-based drug design in cancer and genetic diseases. There are other companies focusing on structure-based drug design to develop therapies in the fields of cancer and other diseases. Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to our approach, and others are based on entirely different approaches. These companies include divisions of large pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies of various sizes. We face competition with respect to our current product candidates, and will face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future, from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.

Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with currently approved therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future from segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets that pursue precision medicines. Key product features that would affect our ability to effectively compete with other therapeutics include the efficacy, safety and convenience of our products. We believe principal competitive factors to our business include, among other things, the accuracy of our computations and predictions, ability to integrate computational and experimental capabilities, ability to successfully transition research programs into clinical development, ability to raise capital, and the scalability of the platform, pipeline, and business.

Many of the companies that we compete against or against which we may compete in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostic industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or ~~early~~earlier stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. In addition, we cannot predict whether our current competitive advantages, such as our ability to leverage our Dynamo platform and our relationship with D. E. Shaw Research, will remain in place in the future. If these or other barriers to entry do not remain in place, other companies may be able to more directly or effectively compete with us.

Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we or our collaborators may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we or our collaborators are able to enter the market. The key competitive factors affecting the success of all of our product candidates, if approved, are likely to be their efficacy, safety, convenience, price, the level of generic competition and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors.

The insurance coverage and reimbursement status of newly-approved products is uncertain. Failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement for any of our product candidates, if approved, could limit our ability to market those products and decrease our ability to generate revenue.

In the United States and markets in other countries, patients generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their treatment. Adequate coverage and reimbursement from governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and commercial payors is critical to new product acceptance. Our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. The availability of coverage and extent of reimbursement by governmental and private payors is essential for most patients to be able to afford ~~treatments such as gene therapy products.~~treatments. Sales of these or other product candidates that we may identify will depend substantially, both domestically and abroad, on the extent to which the costs of our product candidates will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar healthcare management organizations, or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payors. If coverage and adequate reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our product candidates. Even if coverage is provided, the approved reimbursement amount may not be high enough to allow us to establish or maintain pricing sufficient to realize a sufficient return on our investment.

There is also significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the medicine is approved by the FDA or ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authorities. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare and private payors tend to follow CMS to a substantial degree.

Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is (i) a covered benefit under its health plan; (ii) safe, effective and medically necessary; (iii) appropriate for the specific patient; (iv) cost-effective; and (v) neither experimental nor investigational.

Net prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for any product candidate that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement. In addition, many pharmaceutical manufacturers must calculate and report certain price reporting metrics to the government, such as average sales price, or ASP, and best price. Penalties may apply in some cases when such metrics are not submitted accurately and timely. Further, these prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs.

In addition, in some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, the ~~European Union~~EU provides options for its Member States to restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval, some of these countries may require the completion of clinical trials that compare the cost effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies. A Member State may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the medicinal product on the market. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our product candidates. Historically, products launched in the ~~European Union~~EU do not follow price structures of the U.S. and generally prices tend to be significantly lower.

Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties

Under the DESRES Agreement, as amended, we collaborate with D. E. Shaw Research to rapidly develop various protein models, a process that depends on D. E. Shaw Research’s use of their proprietary supercomputer, Anton 2. A termination of the DESRES Agreement could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Under the DESRES Agreement, we collaborate with D. E. Shaw Research to develop various protein models to make predictions as to how molecules might move in connection with identifying potential new biological targets and prospective drug compounds. There can be no assurance these protein models, or the technology used by D. E. Shaw Research to develop them (including the Anton 2 supercomputer), will provide reliable data or target information, or that the findings from these activities and our subsequent validation efforts will translate into the ability to develop therapeutically effective compounds. Our collaboration with D. E. Shaw Research is our key computational collaboration, and there can be no assurance that this collaboration will continue past the current term of the DESRES Agreement, on favorable terms or at all, or that at any time while the collaboration is in effect D. E. Shaw Research will provide a level of service that benefits our programs in a meaningfully positive manner. While we also have other computational collaborations, mostly focused on developing machine learning models, such collaborations do not provide a substitute for the technology made available through our collaboration with D. E. Shaw Research. The termination of the DESRES Agreement or any reduction in our collaboration with D. E. Shaw Research would require us to rely more heavily on these other collaborations and our own internal resources, and may delay or impair our development efforts.

Furthermore, while the termination of the DESRES Agreement would not directly impact the development of our lead product candidates, we cannot predict the effects such termination could have on our preclinical studies and development efforts and our ability to discover and develop additional product candidates. In particular, the technologies accessed through D. E. Shaw Research, including the Anton 2 supercomputer, are important aspects of our Dynamo platform, and we do not currently have access to another source of computational power comparable to that provided by the Anton 2 supercomputer. Currently, not only is our collaboration with D. E. Shaw Research for a limited time period, but it is also limited inwith respect to the ~~current collaboration year to collaboration across a total~~number of ~~eleven~~ target proteins available under the collaboration (with such number subject to increases or decreases from year to year, ~~with any increase in such number of targets in each collaboration year capped at four more than the highest number of such targets in the previous year,~~ and with the number of total targets across categories capped at twenty, subject to some limitations), which could restrict our ability to broaden our platform across a larger number of targets and programs.

between us and D. E. Shaw Research, subject to certain exceptions. In some instances, D. E. Shaw Research is required to assign to us some of the work product created by D. E. Shaw Research. Disputes may arise between us and D. E. Shaw Research, as well as any future potential collaborators, regarding intellectual property subject to the DESRES Agreement. If disputes over intellectual property that we co-own or we own individually prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current collaboration arrangements on acceptable terms, or undermine our ability to successfully control the intellectual property necessary to protect our product candidates, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates. Uncertainties or disagreements around our rights under any such intellectual property may undermine our ability to partner our programs with third parties.

In addition, the DESRES Agreement is complex and certain provisions may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could be adverse to us, for example by narrowing what we believe to be the scope of our rights to certain intellectual property, or increasing what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the DESRES Agreement, and any such outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

We are generally also subject to all of the same risks with respect to protection of intellectual property that we co-own, as we are for intellectual property that we own, which are described below. If we or D. E. Shaw Research fail to adequately protect this intellectual property, our ability to commercialize products could suffer.

Moreover, we are subject to certain payment obligations under the DESRES Agreement, including payments to D. E. Shaw Research in connection with certain transactions, including our collaboration with Genentech pursuant to the ~~Genentech Agreement.~~License Agreement with Genentech. These payment obligations may decrease the value to us of certain transactional opportunities or otherwise burden our ability to enter into such transactions.

We rely on third parties to conduct our ongoing clinical trials of RLY-1971, RLY-4008 and ~~RLY-4008~~RLY-2608 and expect to rely on third parties to conduct future clinical trials, as well as investigator-sponsored clinical trials of our product candidates. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, comply with regulatory requirements or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates and our business could be substantially harmed.

We do not have the ability to independently conduct clinical trials. We rely and expect to continue to rely on medical institutions, clinical investigators, contract laboratories and other third parties, such as CROs, to conduct or otherwise support clinical trials for our product ~~candidates, including our first-in-human clinical trials of RLY-1971 and RLY-4008, currently enrolling patients.~~candidates. We may also rely on academic and private non-academic institutions to conduct and sponsor clinical trials relating to our product candidates. We will not control the design or conduct of the investigator-sponsored trials, and it is possible that the FDA or non-U.S. regulatory authorities will not view

these investigator-sponsored trials as providing adequate support for future clinical trials, whether controlled by us or third parties, for any one or more reasons, including elements of the design or execution of the trials or safety concerns or other trial results.

Such arrangements will likely provide us certain information rights with respect to the investigator-sponsored trials, including access to and the ability to use and reference the data, including for our own regulatory filings, resulting from the investigator-sponsored trials. However, we would not have control over the timing and reporting of the data from investigator-sponsored trials, nor would we own the data from the investigator-sponsored trials. If we are unable to confirm or replicate the results from the investigator-sponsored trials or if negative results are obtained, we would likely be further delayed or prevented from advancing further clinical development of our product candidates. Further, if investigators or institutions breach their obligations with respect to the clinical development of our product candidates, or if the data proves to be inadequate compared to the first-hand knowledge we might have gained had the investigator-sponsored trials been sponsored and conducted by us, then our ability to design and conduct any future clinical trials ourselves may be adversely affected.

We rely and expect to continue to rely heavily on these parties for execution of clinical trials for our product candidates and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements and scientific standards, and our reliance on CROs will not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. For any violations of laws and regulations during the conduct of our clinical trials, we could be subject to warning letters or enforcement action that may include civil penalties up to and including criminal prosecution.

We, our principal investigators and our CROs are required to comply with regulations, including Good Clinical Practices, or GCPs, for conducting, monitoring, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to ensure that the data and results are scientifically credible and accurate, and that the trial patients are adequately informed of the potential risks of participating in clinical trials and their rights are protected. These regulations are enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Economic Area and ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authorities for any products in clinical development, including the EMA and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. These regulatory authorities enforce GCP regulations through periodic inspections of clinical trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we, our principal investigators or our CROs fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that, upon inspection, these regulatory

authorities will determine that any of our future clinical trials will comply with GCPs. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product candidates produced under current Good Manufacturing Practice, or cGMP, regulations. Our failure or the failure of our principal investigators or CROs to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process and could also subject us to enforcement action. We also are required to register ongoing clinical trials and post the results of completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, ClinicalTrials.gov, within certain timeframes. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.

Although we designed our first-in-human clinical trials of RLY-1971, RLY-4008 and ~~RLY-4008~~RLY-2608 and intend to design the future clinical trials for the product candidates that we develop, we expect that CROs will conduct all of our clinical trials. As a result, many important aspects of our development programs, including their conduct and timing, are outside of our direct control. Our reliance on third parties to conduct future clinical trials also results in less direct control over the management of data developed through clinical trials than would be the case if we were relying entirely upon our own staff. Communicating with outside parties can also be challenging, potentially leading to mistakes as well as difficulties in coordinating activities. Outside parties may:

•

have staffing difficulties;

•

fail to comply with contractual obligations;

•

experience regulatory compliance issues;

•

undergo changes in priorities or become financially distressed; or

•

form relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors.

•

~~have staffing difficulties;~~

•

~~fail to comply with contractual obligations;~~

•

~~experience regulatory compliance issues;~~

•

~~undergo changes in priorities or become financially distressed; or~~

•

~~form relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors.~~

These factors may materially adversely affect the willingness or ability of third parties to conduct our clinical trials and may subject us to unexpected cost increases that are beyond our control. If the principal investigators or CROs do not perform clinical trials in a satisfactory manner, breach their obligations to us or fail to comply with regulatory requirements, the development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our product candidates may be delayed, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval and commercialize our product candidates, or our development program materially and irreversibly harmed. If we are unable to rely on clinical data collected by our principal investigators or CROs, we could be required to repeat, extend the duration of, or increase the size of any clinical trials we conduct and this could significantly delay commercialization and require significantly greater expenditures.

If any of our relationships with these third-party principal investigators or CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs. If principal investigators or CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, any clinical trials such principal investigators or CROs are associated with may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, we believe that our financial results and the commercial prospects for our

product candidates in the subject indication would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.

We contract with third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for preclinical development, clinical testing, and expect to continue to do so for commercialization. This reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

We do not currently own or operate, nor do we have any plans to establish in the future, any manufacturing facilities or personnel. We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for preclinical development and clinical testing, as well as for the commercial manufacture of our products if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval. This reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be inspected by the FDA pursuant to pre-approval inspections that will be conducted after we submit our marketing applications to the FDA. We do not control the manufacturing process of, and will be completely dependent on, our contract manufacturers for compliance with cGMPs in connection with the manufacture of our product candidates. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to pass regulatory inspections and/or maintain regulatory compliance for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. If the FDA or a ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authority finds deficiencies with or does not approve these facilities for the manufacture of our product candidates or if it finds deficiencies or withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved. Further, our failure, or the failure of our third-party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including clinical

holds, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or products, if approved, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect our business and supplies of our product candidates.

We may be unable to establish any agreements with third-party manufacturers or to do so on acceptable terms. Even if we are able to establish agreements with third-party manufacturers, reliance on third-party manufacturers entails additional risks, including:

•

reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance;

•

the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;

•

the possible misappropriation of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how; and

•

the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us.

•

~~reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance;~~

•

~~the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party;~~

•

~~the possible misappropriation of our proprietary information, including our trade secrets and know-how; and~~

•

~~the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us.~~

Our product candidates and any products that we may develop may compete with other product candidates and approved products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us. Due to capacity constraints at cGMP manufacturers relating to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we have been required to forecast the amount of clinical trial supply needed for our clinical trials further in advance than had typically been required, and there is limited flexibility to adjust our manufacturing needs as our clinical trials progress, which may lead to added costs or delays in our clinical trials.

Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers could delay clinical development or marketing approval. We are also unable to predict how the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine may affect our third-party manufacturers, including any potential disruptions to our global supply chain. If our current contract manufacturers cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace such manufacturers, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all, or manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we may not have the capabilities or resources. In either scenario, our clinical trials supply could be delayed significantly as we establish alternative supply sources. In some cases, the technical skills required to manufacture our products or product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original contract manufacturing organization, or CMO, and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills to a back-up or alternate supplier, or we may be unable to transfer such skills at all. In addition, if we are required to change CMOs for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new CMO maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations. Changes in manufacturers often involve changes in manufacturing procedures and processes, which could require that we conduct bridging studies between our prior clinical supply used in our clinical trials and that of any new manufacturer. We may be unsuccessful in demonstrating the comparability of clinical supplies which could require the conduct of additional clinical trials. We may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement. Furthermore, a CMO may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such CMO owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such CMO or require us to obtain a license from such CMO in order to have another CMO manufacture our product candidates.

Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates or products may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to commercialize any products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.

The third parties upon whom we rely for the supply of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, drug product and starting materials used in our product candidates are our sole source of supply, and the loss of any of these suppliers could significantly harm our business.

The active pharmaceutical ingredients, or API, drug product and starting materials used in our product candidates are supplied to us primarily from single-source suppliers. Our ability to successfully develop our product candidates, and to ultimately supply our commercial products in quantities sufficient to meet the market demand, depends in part on our ability to obtain the API, drug product and starting materials for these products in accordance with regulatory requirements and in sufficient quantities for clinical testing and commercialization. We do not currently have arrangements in place for a redundant or second-source supply of any such API, drug product or starting materials in the event any of our current suppliers of such API, drug product or starting materials cease their operations for any reason. If any of our third-party suppliers or manufacturers ceases its operations for any reason or is unable or unwilling to supply API, drug product or starting material in sufficient quantities, on the timelines necessary, or at acceptable prices, to meet our needs, it could impede, delay, limit or prevent our development efforts, which could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. We are also unable to predict how changing global economic or political conditions, such as the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and related global economic sanctions, or potential global health concerns, such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, will affect our third-party suppliers and manufacturers. Any negative impact of such matters on our third-party suppliers and manufacturers may also have an adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

For all of our product candidates, we intend to identify and qualify additional manufacturers to provide such API, drug product and starting materials prior to submission of an NDA to the FDA and/or an MAA to the EMA. We are not certain, however, that our single-source suppliers will be able to meet our demand for their products, either because of the nature of our agreements with those suppliers, our

limited experience with those suppliers or our relative importance as a customer to those suppliers. It may be difficult for us to assess their ability to timely meet our demand in the future based on past performance. While our suppliers have generally met our demand for their products on a timely basis in the past, they may subordinate our needs in the future to their other customers.

Establishing additional or replacement suppliers for the API, drug product and starting materials used in our product candidates, if required, may not be accomplished quickly. If we are able to find a replacement supplier, such replacement supplier would need to be qualified and may require additional regulatory inspection or approval, which could result in further delay. While we seek to maintain adequate inventory of the API, drug product and starting materials used in our product candidates, any interruption or delay in the supply of components or materials, or our inability to obtain such API, drug product or starting materials from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner could impede, delay, limit or prevent our development efforts, which could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

We have and may enter into other collaborations with third parties for the research, development, manufacture and commercialization of one or more of our programs or product candidates. If these collaborations are not successful, our business could be adversely affected.

We have entered into and may enter into collaborations with third parties for one or more of our programs or product ~~candidates. For example, in December 2020, we entered into the Genentech~~candidates, such as our License Agreement ~~a global collaboration and license agreement~~ with Genentech to develop and commercialize ~~RLY-1971, and in August 2021, we entered into a discovery collaboration agreement with EQRx to discover, develop and commercialize novel medicines against mutually agreed upon targets.~~RLY-1971. If we enter into any such arrangements with any third parties, we will likely have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that any future collaborators dedicate to the development or commercialization of our product candidates. Our ability to generate revenue from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them.

Any collaborations we have entered into or will enter into ~~including our collaboration with Genentech and EQRx,~~ may pose several risks, including the following:

•

Collaborators may have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations;

•

Collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected;

•

The clinical trials conducted as part of these collaborations may not be successful;

•

Collaborators may not pursue development and/or commercialization of any product candidates that achieve regulatory approval or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborators’ strategic focus or available funding or external factors, such as an acquisition, that divert resources or create competing priorities;

•

Collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for clinical trials, stop a clinical trial or abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new formulation of a product candidate for clinical testing;

•

We may not have access to, or may be restricted from disclosing, certain information regarding product candidates being developed or commercialized under a collaboration and, consequently, may have limited ability to inform our stockholders about the status of such product candidates;

•

Collaborators could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete directly or indirectly with our product candidates if the collaborators believe that competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically attractive than ours;

•

Product candidates developed in collaboration with us may be viewed by any collaborators as competitive with their own product candidates or products, which may cause collaborators to cease to devote resources to the commercialization of our product candidates;

•

A collaborator with marketing and distribution rights to one or more of our product candidates that achieve regulatory approval may not commit sufficient resources to the marketing and distribution of any such product candidate;

•

Disagreements with collaborators, including disagreements over proprietary rights, contract interpretation or the preferred course of development of any programs or product candidates, may cause delays or termination of the research, development, manufacture or commercialization of such programs or product candidates, may lead to additional responsibilities for us with respect to such programs or product candidates or may result in litigation or arbitration, any of which would be time-consuming and expensive;

•

Collaborators may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property rights or may use our proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our intellectual property or proprietary information or expose us to potential litigation. For example, Genentech has the first right to enforce or defend certain of our intellectual property rights under our collaboration, and although we may have the right to assume the enforcement and defense of such intellectual property rights if Genentech does not, our ability to do so may be compromised by Genentech’s actions;

•

Disputes may arise with respect to the ownership of intellectual property developed pursuant to our collaborations;

•

Collaborators may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation and potential liability; and

•

Collaborations may be terminated for the convenience of the collaborator and, if terminated, we could be required to raise additional capital to pursue further development or commercialization of the applicable product candidates. For example, Genentech may terminate its collaboration with us for convenience after a specified notice period.

•

~~Collaborators may have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to these collaborations;~~

•

~~Collaborators may not perform their obligations as expected;~~

•

~~The clinical trials conducted as part of these collaborations may not be successful;~~

•

~~Disputes may arise with respect to the ownership of intellectual property developed pursuant to our collaborations;~~

•

~~Collaborators may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may expose us to litigation and potential liability; and~~

•

If our collaborations do not result in the successful development and commercialization of products, or if one of any future collaborators terminates its agreement with us, we may not receive any milestone or royalty payments under the collaboration. If we do not receive the payments we expect under these agreements, our development of product candidates could be delayed and we may need additional resources to develop our product candidates. All of the risks relating to product development, regulatory approval and commercialization summarized and described in this report also apply to the activities of our collaborators.

In addition, if any collaborator terminates its agreement with us, we may find it more difficult to attract new collaborators and our reputation among the business and financial communities could be adversely affected.

We may seek to establish additional collaborations, and, if we are not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans.

Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For some of our product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with additional pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates.

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. The terms of any additional collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.

We may also be restricted under collaboration agreements from entering into future agreements on certain terms with potential collaborators. Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators.

We may not be able to negotiate additional collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of the product candidate for which we are seeking to collaborate, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.

We may be required to pay certain milestones and royalties under our license or collaboration agreements with third-party licensors or collaborators.

Under our current and future license or collaboration agreements, including our DESRES Agreement, we may be required to pay milestones, royalties and other payments based on our revenues, including revenues from product sales, and these milestones and royalty

payments could adversely affect the overall profitability of any products that we may seek to commercialize. In order to maintain our rights under these agreements, we may need to meet certain specified milestones in the development of our product candidates. Further, our licensors (or their licensors), licensees or other strategic collaborators may dispute the terms, including amounts, that we are required to pay under the respective license or collaboration agreements. If these claims result in a material increase in the amounts that we are required to pay to our licensors or collaborators, or in a claim of breach of the license, our ability to research, develop and obtain approval of product candidates or to commercialize our products could be significantly impaired.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Ability to Raise Additional Capital

Risks Related to Our Operating History

We are a biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history.

We are a biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history and have incurred net losses in each year since our inception. Our net losses were ~~$296.4~~$62.0 million and ~~$87.7~~$42.2 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of ~~$700.6~~$830.1 million as of ~~September 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022. Biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and involves a substantial degree of risk. We commenced operations in May 2015. Since inception, we have focused substantially all of our efforts and financial resources on developing our drug discovery platform and initial product candidates. We have no products approved for commercial sale and therefore have never generated any revenue from product sales, and we do not expect to in the foreseeable future. We have not obtained regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates and there is no assurance that we will obtain approvals in the future. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses over the next several years and for the foreseeable future. Our prior losses, combined with expected future losses, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ deficit and working capital.

We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future.

Substantially all of our operating losses have resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect our research and development expenses to significantly increase in connection with the commencement and continuation of clinical trials of our product candidates. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, we will incur significant sales, marketing and outsourced-manufacturing expenses. We will also continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. As a result, we expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when we will become profitable, if at all. Even if we do become profitable, we may not be able to sustain or increase our profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

The amount of our future losses is uncertain and our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly or may fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, each of which may cause our stock price to fluctuate or decline. Our quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficult to predict, including the following:

•

the timing and success or failure of clinical trials for our product candidates or competing product candidates, or any other change in the competitive landscape of our industry, including consolidation among our competitors or partners;

•

our ability to successfully recruit and retain subjects for clinical trials, and any delays caused by difficulties in such efforts;

•

our ability to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, and the timing and scope of any such approvals we may receive;

•

the timing and cost of, and level of investment in, research and development activities relating to our product candidates, which may change from time to time;

•

the cost of manufacturing our product candidates, which may vary depending on the quantity of production and the terms of our agreements with manufacturers;

•

our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel;

•

expenditures that we will or may incur to develop additional product candidates;

•

the level of demand for our product candidates should they receive approval, which may vary significantly;

•

the risk/benefit profile, cost and reimbursement policies with respect to our product candidates, if approved, and existing and potential future therapeutics that compete with our product candidates;

•

the changing and volatile U.S. and global economic environments or political instability, including as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine; and

•

future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies.

•

~~our ability to successfully recruit and retain subjects for clinical trials, and any delays caused by difficulties in such efforts;~~

•

~~our ability to obtain marketing approval for our product candidates, and the timing and scope of any such approvals we may receive;~~

•

~~the timing and cost of, and level of investment in, research and development activities relating to our product candidates, which may change from time to time;~~

•

~~the cost of manufacturing our product candidates, which may vary depending on the quantity of production and the terms of our agreements with manufacturers;~~

•

~~our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel;~~

•

~~expenditures that we will or may incur to develop additional product candidates;~~

•

~~the level of demand for our product candidates should they receive approval, which may vary significantly;~~

•

~~the risk/benefit profile, cost and reimbursement policies with respect to our product candidates, if approved, and existing and potential future therapeutics that compete with our product candidates;~~

•

~~the changing and volatile U.S. and global economic environments, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; and~~

•

~~future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies.~~

The cumulative effects of these factors could result in large fluctuations and unpredictability in our quarterly and annual operating results. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. This variability and unpredictability could

also result in our failing to meet the expectations of industry or financial analysts or investors for any period. If our revenue or operating results fall below the expectations of analysts or investors or below any forecasts we may provide to the market, or if the forecasts we

provide to the market are below the expectations of analysts or investors, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Such a stock price decline could occur even when we have met any previously publicly stated guidance we may provide.

We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales.

Our ability to become profitable depends upon our ability to generate revenue. To date, we have not generated any revenue from our product sales and we do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the near future. We do not expect to generate significant revenue unless and until we obtain marketing approval of, and begin to sell one or more of our product candidates. Our ability to generate revenue depends on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to:

•

successfully complete preclinical studies;

•

successfully enroll subjects in, and complete, clinical trials;

•

have our IND applications go into effect for our planned clinical trials or future clinical trials;

•

receive regulatory approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;

•

initiate and successfully complete all safety studies required to obtain U.S. and foreign marketing approval for our product candidates;

•

establish commercial manufacturing capabilities or make arrangements with third-party manufacturers for clinical supply and commercial manufacturing;

•

obtain and maintain patent and trade secret protection or regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates;

•

launch commercial sales of our product candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;

•

obtain and maintain acceptance of the product candidates, if and when approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;

•

effectively compete with other therapies;

•

obtain and maintain healthcare coverage and adequate reimbursement;

•

enforce and defend intellectual property rights and claims;

•

take temporary precautionary measures to help minimize the risk of COVID-19 to our employees; and

•

maintain a continued acceptable safety profile of the product candidates following approval.

•

~~successfully complete preclinical studies;~~

•

~~successfully enroll subjects in, and complete, clinical trials;~~

•

~~have our IND applications go into effect for our planned clinical trials or future clinical trials;~~

•

~~receive regulatory approvals from applicable regulatory authorities;~~

•

~~initiate and successfully complete all safety studies required to obtain U.S. and foreign marketing approval for our product candidates;~~

•

~~establish commercial manufacturing capabilities or make arrangements with third-party manufacturers for clinical supply and commercial manufacturing;~~

•

~~obtain and maintain patent and trade secret protection or regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates;~~

•

~~launch commercial sales of our product candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others;~~

•

~~obtain and maintain acceptance of the product candidates, if and when approved, by patients, the medical community and third-party payors;~~

•

~~effectively compete with other therapies;~~

•

~~obtain and maintain healthcare coverage and adequate reimbursement;~~

•

~~enforce and defend intellectual property rights and claims;~~

•

~~take temporary precautionary measures to help minimize the risk of COVID-19 to our employees; and~~

•

~~maintain a continued acceptable safety profile of the product candidates following approval.~~

If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which would materially harm our business. If we do not receive regulatory approvals for our product candidates, we may not be able to continue our operations.

Risks Related to Raising Additional Capital

We will need to raise substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some of our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

The development of pharmaceutical products is capital-intensive. We ~~initiated a Phase 1~~are continuing our clinical trial of RLY-1971 in patients with advanced solid tumors and a first-in-human clinical trial of RLY-4008 enriched for patients with advanced solid tumors having oncogenic FGFR2 alterations. We are currently advancing mosttrials of our lead product candidates, ~~including~~RLY-4008, RLY-2608 and RLY-1971, and advancing our other ~~PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs,~~product candidates through preclinical development. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue the research and development of, initiate clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition, depending on the status of regulatory approval or, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. We may also need to raise additional funds sooner if we choose to pursue additional indications and/or geographies for our product candidates or otherwise expand more rapidly than we presently anticipate. Furthermore, we are incurring additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate certain of our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

We expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to fund our operations through at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a result of many factors, including:

•

the impact of any business interruptions to our operations, including the timing and enrollment of patients in our planned clinical trials, or to those of our manufacturers, suppliers, or other vendors, resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or similar public health crisis or the changing political conditions such as the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and related global economic sanctions;

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of our current and future clinical trials of RLY-4008 and RLY-2608 and additional preclinical research of our PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs;

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of drug discovery, preclinical research and clinical trials for our other product candidates;

•

the number of future product candidates that we pursue and their development requirements;

•

the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;

•

our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;

•

the success of any existing or future collaborations that we may enter into with third parties;

•

the achievement of milestones or occurrence of other developments that trigger payments under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;

•

the extent to which we are obligated to reimburse, or entitled to reimbursement of, clinical trial costs under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;

•

the amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval;

•

the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;

•

our headcount growth and associated costs as we expand our business operations and our research and development activities; and

•

the costs of operating as a public company.

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of our current and future clinical trials of RLY-4008, future clinical trials of RLY-2608 and additional preclinical research of our PI3Kα mutant selective inhibitor programs;

•

~~the scope, progress, results and costs of drug discovery, preclinical research and clinical trials for our other product candidates;~~

•

~~the number of future product candidates that we pursue and their development requirements;~~

•

~~the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;~~

•

~~our ability to establish and maintain collaborations on favorable terms, if at all;~~

•

~~the success of any existing or future collaborations that we may enter into with third parties;~~

•

~~the achievement of milestones or occurrence of other developments that trigger payments under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;~~

•

~~the extent to which we are obligated to reimburse, or entitled to reimbursement of, clinical trial costs under any existing or future collaboration agreements, if any;~~

•

~~the amount of revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval;~~

•

~~the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims;~~

•

~~our headcount growth and associated costs as we expand our business operations and our research and development activities; and~~

•

~~the costs of operating as a public company.~~

Identifying potential product candidates and conducting preclinical development testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval and achieve product sales. In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if at all. Accordingly, we will need to continue to rely on additional financing to achieve our business objectives.

Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates. Disruptions in the financial markets may make equity and debt financing more difficult to obtain, and may have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our fundraising needs. We cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Moreover, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. The sale of additional equity or convertible securities would dilute all of our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed payment obligations and we may be required to agree to certain restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or otherwise at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects.

If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of our research or development programs or the commercialization of any product candidate or be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities

convertible or exchangeable into common stock, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of those securities may include liquidation or other preferences that materially adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. We may offer and sell up to an aggregate amount of $300.0 million of our common stock from time to time in ~~“at-the-market”~~“at the market” offerings pursuant to the sales agreement, or the Sales Agreement,

with Cowen and Company, LLC, subject to the limitations thereof. As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, no shares of common stock have been sold under the Sales Agreement. Debt financing, if available, would increase our fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

If we raise funds through additional collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Risks Related to COVID-19 and the Global Economy

AThe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our business and any future pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease ~~such as COVID-19, may materially and adversely~~could similarly affect our business and our financial results and could cause afurther disruption to the development of our product candidates.

Public health crises such as pandemics or similar outbreaks could adversely impact our business. ~~The current~~While progress has been made in the fight against the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including the broad dissemination and administration of vaccines in certain countries, the COVID-19 pandemic has continued to spread ~~to most countries across the world,~~globally, including in all 50 states within the United States, including specifically Cambridge, Massachusetts where our primary office and laboratory space is located. The COVID-19 pandemic ~~is evolving,~~has continued to evolve as new variants of COVID-19 have been identified and ~~to date has~~spread, which have led to ~~the implementation of~~ various responses, including government-imposed quarantines, travel restrictions and other public health safety measures. The extent to which the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic ~~impacts~~may continue to affect our operations or those of our third-party partners, including our preclinical or other nonclinical studies or clinical trial operations, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the severity and duration of ~~the outbreak and~~additional variant outbreaks, vaccination rates where we or our ~~third-party~~third party partners conduct operations, ~~new information that will emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus~~ and the actions to contain ~~the coronavirus~~COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. The continued spread of COVID-19 globally could adversely impact our preclinical, other nonclinical or clinical trial operations in the United States, including our ability to obtain slots for IND-enabling studies and recruit and retain patients and principal investigators and site staff who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to COVID-19 if ~~an outbreak occurs in their geography.~~infection rates remain high. For example, similar to other biopharmaceutical companies, we may experience delays in initiating IND-enabling studies, protocol deviations, enrolling our clinical trials, or dosing of patients in our clinical trials as well as in activating new trial sites. COVID-19 may also affect employees of third-party CROs located in affected geographies that we rely upon to carry out our clinical trials. In addition, ~~as a result~~if any patients enrolled in our clinical trials are infected with COVID-19, they may not be able to complete these trials. Further, since the beginning of ~~medical complications associated with SDC~~the COVID-19 pandemic, three vaccines for COVID-19 have received Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA and ~~mCPRC, the patient populations that our lead core and other core product candidates target~~two of those later received marketing approval. Additional vaccines may be ~~particularly susceptible~~authorized or approved in the future. The resultant demand for vaccines and potential for manufacturing facilities and materials to ~~COVID-19, which~~be commandeered under the Defense Production Act of 1950, or equivalent foreign legislation, may make it more difficult to obtain materials or manufacturing slots for ~~us to identify patients able to enroll in~~the products needed for our ~~current and future~~ clinical trials, ~~and may impact the ability of enrolled patients~~which could lead to ~~complete any such~~delays in these trials. Any negative impact COVID-19 has to patient enrollment or treatment or the execution of our product candidates could cause costly delays to clinical trial activities, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and to commercialize our product candidates, increase our operating expenses, and have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Additionally, timely enrollment in ongoing and planned future clinical trials is dependent upon clinical trial sites which could be adversely affected by global health matters, such as pandemics. We ~~plan to~~ conduct clinical trials for our product candidates in geographies which ~~are currently being~~continue to be affected by ~~the coronavirus.~~COVID-19. Some factors from the ~~coronavirus outbreak~~ongoing COVID-19 pandemic that will delay or otherwise adversely affect enrollment in the clinical trials of our product candidates, as well as our business generally, include:

•

the potential diversion of healthcare resources away from the conduct of clinical trials to focus on pandemic concerns, including the attention of physicians serving as our clinical trial investigators, hospitals serving as our clinical trial sites and hospital staff supporting the conduct of our prospective clinical trials;

•

limitations on travel that could interrupt key trial and business activities, such as clinical trial site initiations and monitoring, domestic and international travel by employees, contractors or patients to clinical trial sites, including any government-imposed travel restrictions or quarantines that will impact the ability or willingness of patients, employees or contractors to travel to our clinical trial sites or secure visas or entry permissions, a loss of face-to-face meetings and other interactions with potential partners, any of which could delay or adversely impact the conduct or progress of our prospective clinical trials;

•

~~the potential negative effect on the operations of our third-party manufacturers, suppliers or other collaboration partners;~~

•

interruption in global shipping affecting the transport of clinical trial materials, such as patient samples, investigational drug product and conditioning drugs and other supplies used in our prospective clinical trials; and

•

business disruptions caused by potential workplace, laboratory and office closures and an increased reliance on employees working from home, disruptions to or delays in ongoing laboratory experiments and operations, staffing shortages, travel limitations or mass transit disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our business operations or delay necessary interactions with local regulators, ethics committees and other important agencies and contractors.

We are continuing to monitor the spread of the virus as well as vaccination rates among our employees and within our community. We have adopted certain temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to our clinical trial sites or secure visas or entry permissions, a loss of face-to-face meetings and other interactions with potential partners, any of which could delay or adversely impact the conduct or progress of our clinical trials;

We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of the planned and potential shutdowns or disruptions of businesses and government agencies, such as the SEC or FDA.

These and other factors arising from the ~~coronavirus~~ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could worsen ~~in countries that are already afflicted with~~as the ~~coronavirus or could continue~~pandemic continues to ~~spread to additional countries.~~evolve. Any of these factors, and other factors related to any ~~such~~unforeseen disruptions, ~~that are unforeseen,~~have had and could

continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operation and financial condition. Further, uncertainty around these and related issues could lead to adverse effects on the economy of the United States and other economies, which could impact our ability to raise the necessary capital needed to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

~~Unfavorable global~~Global economic ~~conditions~~uncertainty or political instability could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions and uncertainty in the global economy and in the global financial markets. ~~For example,~~Economic uncertainty in ~~2008, the~~various global ~~financial crisis~~markets caused ~~extreme volatility~~by political instability, changes in trade agreements and ~~disruptions in the capital and credit markets and~~conflicts, such as the current ~~COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant volatility~~conflict between Russia and ~~uncertainty in U.S.~~Ukraine, and ~~international markets. See “—A pandemic, epidemic, or outbreak of an infectious disease, such~~related sanctions as ~~COVID-19, or coronavirus, may materially and adversely affect our business and our financial results and could cause~~well as a ~~disruption to the development of our product candidates.~~”A severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including ~~weakened demand for~~difficulty in enrolling participants in our ~~product candidates~~clinical trials, difficulty in forecasting our financial results and managing inventory levels and negatively impacting our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. ~~A weak~~Political developments impacting government spending and international trade, including potential government shutdowns and trade disputes and tariffs, may negatively impact markets and cause weaker macro-economic conditions. The effects of these events may continue due to potential U.S. government shutdowns and the transition in administrations, and the United States’ ongoing trade disputes with China and other countries. Additionally, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant volatility and uncertainty in U.S. and international markets. See “—The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our business and any future pandemic, epidemic, or ~~declining economy~~outbreak of an infectious disease could similarly affect our business and our financial results and could cause further disruption to the development of our product candidates.” Global economic uncertainty or political instability, including the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, has also strained, and could continue to strain, certain of our suppliers, possibly resulting in supply ~~disruption, or cause our customers to delay making payments for our services.~~disruption. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions, including the global economic uncertainty resulting from the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and otherwise, could adversely impact our business.

If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology or obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products will be impaired.

Our commercial success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary or intellectual property protection in the United States and other countries for our product candidates, and our core technologies, including our novel target discovery technology and our proprietary compound library and other know-how. We seek to protect our proprietary and intellectual property position by, among other methods, filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development and implementation of our business. We also rely on trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our proprietary and intellectual property position. Other than our U.S. patent relating to RLY-1971 composition of matter, we do not own or in-license any issued patents relating to our platform, our SHP2 program, ~~our~~ FGFR2 program, or ~~our~~ PI3K program.

Pursuant to the License Agreement with Genentech, ~~Agreement,~~ we have granted an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing license to Genentech, with the right to sublicense, develop and commercialize RLY-1971 and any other SHP2 inhibitors developed under the ~~Genentech Agreement.~~License Agreement with Genentech. Genentech has the first right, but not the obligation, to file, prosecute and maintain any patents licensed to it, as well as to enforce infringement of or defend claims against such patents that relate to RLY-1971 or other SHP2 inhibitors. See ~~“Risks~~“Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties—We have and may enter into collaborations with third parties for the research, development, manufacture and

commercialization of one or more of our programs or product candidates. If these collaborations are not successful, our business could be adversely affected.” for a discussion of risks related to the protection of our intellectual property rights under our collaborations.

Most of the research and development for our programs has been performed under the DESRES Agreement. Under the DESRES Agreement, D. E. Shaw Research controls the rights to its technology (including its supercomputer and software, each of which are important aspects of our Dynamo platform), we control the rights to certain compounds, and we jointly own with D. E. Shaw Research any other work product created by D. E. Shaw Research and us. Subject to certain limits, we have the right to have the following work product assigned to us: the composition of matter, method of use, and method of manufacture of certain compounds directed to a Category 1 Target, as set forth in the DESRES Agreement.

We have not yet designated all of the compounds for which we will have this right of assignment, and thus, we do not yet know the scope of exclusivity we will enjoy under our patent rights for our product candidates.

After any work product is assigned to us, we will have the right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain patents that cover such assigned work product. We also have the implicit right to defend patents that cover work product owned by us.

To date, much of the work product created under our agreement with D. E. Shaw Research has been created by D. E. Shaw Research and us, together, and is thus co-owned. We have the first right to prepare, file, prosecute, maintain and defend patents that cover work product created by D. E. Shaw Research and us, together. If we choose not to exercise those rights with respect to patents and patent applications that cover joint work product, D. E. Shaw Research will have the right to take over such activities, unless such rights are waived, as is the case for our co-owned SHP2 patent applications. The party that is preparing, filing, prosecuting and maintaining a patent that covers joint work product also has the right to enforce such patent against infringers.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation.

The degree of patent protection we require to successfully commercialize our product candidates may be unavailable or severely limited in some cases and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. We cannot provide any assurances that any of our pending patent applications will issue, or that any of our pending patent applications that mature into issued patents will include claims with a scope sufficient to protect RLY-1971, RLY-4008, RLY-2608 or our other product candidates. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Furthermore, patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, the natural expiration of a patent is generally twenty years after it is filed. Various extensions may be available; however, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned patent portfolio and any patent portfolio we may license in the future may not provide us with adequate and continuing patent protection sufficient to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to our product candidates, including generic versions of such products.

We have licensed patent rights, and in the future may license additional patent rights, to or from third parties. For example, we have licensed our patent rights to our SHP2 program to Genentech. These licensed patent rights may be valuable to our business, and we may not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology or medicines underlying such licenses. We cannot be certain that these patents and applications will be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If any such licensors or licensees fail to maintain such patents, or lose rights to those patents, the rights we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated and our right to develop and commercialize any of our products that are the subject of such licensed rights could be adversely affected.

Other parties have developed technologies that may be related or competitive to our own, and such parties may have filed or may file patent applications, or may have received or may receive patents, claiming inventions that may overlap or conflict with those claimed in our own patent applications, with respect to either the same methods or formulations or the same subject matter, in either case that we may rely upon to dominate our patent position in the market. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore, we cannot know with certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights cannot be predicted with any certainty.

In addition, the patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Further, with respect to most of the pending patent applications covering our product candidates, prosecution has yet to commence. Patent prosecution is a lengthy process, during which the scope of the claims initially submitted for examination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, have been significantly narrowed by the time they issue, if at all. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is

too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, in some circumstances, we do not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology that we license from third parties. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.

Even if we acquire patent protection that we expect should enable us to maintain such competitive advantage, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned and licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. For example, we may be subject to a third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO challenging the priority of an invention claimed within one of our patents, which submissions may also be made prior to a patent’s issuance, precluding the granting of any of our pending patent applications. We may become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter parties review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others from whom we have obtained licenses to such rights.

Competitors may claim that they invented the inventions claimed in our issued patents or patent applications prior to us, or may file patent applications before we do. Competitors may also claim that we are infringing on their patents and that we therefore cannot practice our technology as claimed under our patents, if issued. Competitors may also contest our patents, if issued, by showing the patent examiner that the invention was not original, was not novel or was obvious. In litigation, a competitor could claim that our patents, if issued, are not valid for a number of reasons. If a court agrees, we would lose our rights to those challenged patents.

In addition, we may in the future be subject to claims by our former employees or consultants asserting an ownership right in our patents or patent applications, as a result of the work they performed on our behalf. Although we generally require all of our employees, consultants and advisors and any other third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to assign or grant similar rights to their inventions to us, we cannot be certain that we have executed such agreements with all parties who may have contributed to our intellectual property, nor can we be certain that our agreements with such parties will be upheld in the face of a potential challenge, or that they will not be breached, for which we may not have an adequate remedy. With respect to intellectual property arising in the course of our collaboration with D. E. Shaw Research, disagreements between us and D. E. Shaw Research may impact our exclusive control of intellectual property important for protecting our product candidates and proprietary position. A loss of exclusivity, in whole or in part, could allow others to compete with us and harm our business.

An adverse determination in any such submission or proceeding may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole or in part, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, without payment to us, or could limit the duration of the patent protection covering our technology and product candidates. Such challenges may also result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize our product candidates without infringing third party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.

Even if they are unchallenged, our owned patent portfolio and any patent portfolio we may license in the future may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner. For example, a third party may develop a competitive product that provides benefits similar to one or more of our product candidates but that has a different composition that falls outside the scope of our patent protection. If the patent protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold or pursue with respect to our product candidates is not sufficiently broad to impede such competition, our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates could be negatively affected, which would harm our business.

Obtaining and maintaining patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. In addition, periodic maintenance fees on issued patents often must be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies over the lifetime of the patent. While an unintentional lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our products or procedures, we may not be able to stop a competitor from marketing products that are the same as or similar to our product candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our failure to secure trademark registrations could adversely affect our business and our ability to market our products and product candidates.

Our trademark applications in the United States and any other jurisdictions where we may file may not be allowed for registration, and our registered trademarks may not be maintained or enforced. During trademark registration proceedings, we may receive rejections. Although we are given an opportunity to respond to those rejections, we may be unable to overcome such rejections. In addition, in the USPTO and in corresponding foreign agencies, third parties are given an opportunity to oppose pending trademark applications and to seek to cancel registered trademarks. Opposition or cancellation proceedings may be filed against our applications and/or registrations, and our applications and/or registrations may not survive such proceedings. Failure to secure such trademark registrations in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions could adversely affect our business and our ability to market our products and product candidates.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position may be harmed.

In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely upon unpatented trade secret protection, unpatented know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. With respect to the building of our proprietary compound library, we consider trade secrets and know-how to be our primary intellectual property. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, scientific advisors, employees and consultants, and invention assignment agreements with our consultants and employees. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical know-how or other trade secrets by the parties to these agreements, however, despite the existence generally of confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions. Monitoring unauthorized uses and disclosures is difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary technologies will be effective. If any of the collaborators, scientific advisors, employees and consultants who are parties to these agreements breaches or violates the terms of any of these agreements, we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach or violation, and we could lose our trade secrets as a result. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent litigation, is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets.

Our trade secrets could otherwise become known or be independently discovered by our competitors. Competitors could purchase our product candidates and attempt to replicate some or all of the competitive advantages we derive from our development efforts, willfully infringe our intellectual property rights, design around our protected technology or develop their own competitive technologies that fall outside of our intellectual property rights. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If our trade secrets are not adequately protected so as to protect our market against competitors’ products, our competitive position could be adversely affected, as could our business.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights and intellectual property of third parties. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by extensive and frequent litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. We may in the future become party to, or threatened with, adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our product candidates and technology, including interference proceedings before the USPTO. Our competitors or other third parties may assert infringement claims against us, alleging that our products or technologies are covered by their patents. Given the vast number of patents in our field of technology, we cannot be certain that we do not infringe existing patents or that we will not infringe patents that may be granted in the future. Many companies have filed, and continue to file, patent applications related to SHP2 inhibitors, FGFR2 inhibitors, and PI3K inhibitors. Some of these patent applications have already been allowed or issued, and others may issue in the future. Since these areas are competitive and of strong interest to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, there will likely be additional patent applications filed and additional patents granted in the future, as well as additional research and development programs expected in the future. Furthermore, because patent applications can take many years to issue and may be confidential for 18 months or more after filing, and because pending patent claims can be revised before issuance, there may be applications now pending which may later result in issued patents that may be infringed by the manufacture, use or sale of our product candidates, or the practice of our technology. If a patent holder believes our product or product candidate infringes on its patent, the patent holder may sue us even if we have received patent protection for our technology. Moreover, we may face patent infringement claims from non-practicing entities that have no relevant product revenue and against whom our owned patent portfolio and any patent portfolio we may license in the future may thus have no deterrent effect.

If we are found to infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our product candidates and technology. We may choose to obtain a license, even in the absence of an

action or finding of infringement. In either case, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain such a license, it could be granted on non-exclusive terms, thereby providing our competitors and other third parties access to the same technologies licensed to us. Without such a license, we could be forced, including by court order, to cease developing and commercializing the infringing technology or product candidates. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed such third-party patent rights. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. If we lose a foreign patent lawsuit, alleging our infringement of a competitor’s patents, we could be prevented from marketing our products in one or more foreign countries, which would have a materially adverse effect on our business.

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our competitors or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.

We could in the future be subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of former employers or competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the intellectual property, proprietary information, know-how or trade secrets of others in their work for us, we may in the future be subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, or that we or these individuals have, inadvertently or otherwise, used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets or other proprietary information of a former employer or competitor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and could be a distraction to management. If our defenses to these claims fail, in addition to requiring us to pay monetary damages, a court could prohibit us from using technologies or features that are essential to our product candidates, if such technologies or features are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. An inability to incorporate such technologies or features would have a material adverse effect on our business, and may prevent us from successfully commercializing our product candidates. In addition, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel as a result of such claims. Moreover, any such litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our ability to hire employees or contract with independent sales representatives. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our product candidates, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors and other third parties may infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate our patents and other intellectual property rights. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims. A court may disagree with our allegations, however, and may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the third-party technology in question. Further, such third parties could counterclaim that we infringe their intellectual property or that a patent we have asserted against them is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims challenging the validity, enforceability or scope of asserted patents are commonplace. In addition, third parties may initiate legal proceedings against us to assert such challenges to our intellectual property rights. The outcome of any such proceeding is generally unpredictable. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Patents may be unenforceable if someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the

USPTO or made a misleading statement during prosecution. It is possible that prior art of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution exists, which could render any patents that may issue invalid. Moreover, it is also possible that prior art may exist that we are aware of but do not believe is relevant to our future patents, should they issue, but that could nevertheless be determined to render our patents invalid.

An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability of our patents covering one of our product candidates, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection covering such product candidate. Competing products may also be sold in other countries in which our patent coverage might not exist or be as strong.

Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.

Litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims, with or without merit, is unpredictable and generally expensive and time consuming and is likely to divert significant resources from our core business, including distracting our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities.

We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or misappropriating or from successfully challenging our intellectual property rights. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

We may not be able to effectively enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. The requirements for patentability may differ in certain countries, particularly in developing countries. Moreover, our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights may be adversely affected by unforeseen changes in foreign intellectual property laws. Additionally, the patent laws of some foreign countries do not afford intellectual property protection to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of some countries, particularly developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property rights. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or the misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, if our ability to enforce our patents to stop infringing activities is inadequate. These products may compete with our product candidates, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and resources from other aspects of our business. Furthermore, while we intend to protect our intellectual property rights in the major markets for our product candidates, we cannot ensure that we will be able to initiate or maintain similar efforts in all jurisdictions in which we may wish to market our product candidates. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate.

If we do not obtain patent term extension and data exclusivity for any product candidates we may develop, our business may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of any product candidates we may develop, one or more of our U.S. patents may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Action of 1984, or Hatch-Waxman Amendments. The Hatch-Waxman Amendments permit a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. However, we may not be granted an extension because of, for example, failing to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements.

Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or term of any such extension is less than we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following our patent expiration, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially harmed.

We may need to license certain intellectual property from third parties, and such licenses may not be available or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.

A third party may hold intellectual property, including patent rights, that are important or necessary to the development of our products. It may be necessary for us to use the patented or proprietary technology of third parties to commercialize our products, in which case we would be required to obtain a license from these third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or our business could be harmed, possibly materially. Although we believe that licenses to these patents are available from these third parties on commercially reasonable terms, if we were not able to obtain a license, or were not able to obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, our business could be harmed, possibly materially.

If we fail to comply with our obligations in the agreements under which we collaborate with or license intellectual property rights from third parties, or otherwise experience disruptions to our business relationships with our collaborators or licensors, we could lose rights that are important to our business.

We expect our future license agreements will impose, various development, diligence, commercialization, and other obligations on us in order to maintain the licenses. In spite of our efforts, a future licensor might conclude that we have materially breached our obligations under such license agreements and seek to terminate the license agreements, thereby removing or limiting our ability to develop and commercialize products and technology covered by these license agreements. If these in-licenses are terminated, or if the underlying patent rights licensed thereunder fail to provide the intended exclusivity, competitors or other third parties would have the freedom to seek regulatory approval of, and to market, products identical to ours and we may be required to cease our development and commercialization of certain of our product candidates. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.

Moreover, disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to a licensing agreement, including:

The agreements under which we may license intellectual property or technology from third parties may be complex, and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.

These and similar issues may arise with respect to our collaboration agreements, such as our DESRES Agreement, as amended. Our collaboration with D. E. Shaw Research is our key computational collaboration, and there can be no assurance that this collaboration will continue past the current term of the DESRES Agreement, on favorable terms or at all, or that at any time while the collaboration is in effect D. E. Shaw Research will provide any particular level of services or that the parties will operate under the agreement without disputes. These disputes may involve ownership or control of intellectual property rights, exclusivity obligations, diligence and payment obligations, for example.

The DESRES Agreement imposes certain exclusivity obligations on us during the term of the agreement with respect to Category 2 targets, and certain exclusivity obligations on D. E. Shaw Research during and after the term of the agreement. While we have some degree of control over how we designate various targets under the DESRES Agreement, D. E. Shaw Research has some degree of control over such designations as well, and our exclusivity obligations limit or delay our ability to conduct research on selected targets with third parties.

Under the DESRES Agreement, D. E. Shaw Research controls the rights to its technology, we control the rights to certain compounds, and we jointly own with D. E. Shaw Research any other work product created by D. E. Shaw Research and us. Any work product we jointly own with D. E. Shaw Research and any other information that we or D. E. Shaw Research share is subject to a non-exclusive cross-license between us and D. E. Shaw Research, subject to certain exceptions. In some instances, D. E. Shaw Research is required to assign to us some of the work product created by D. E. Shaw Research. Disputes may arise between us and D. E. Shaw Research, as well as any future potential collaborators, regarding intellectual property subject to the DESRES Agreement. If disputes over intellectual property that we co-own or we own individually prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current collaboration arrangements on acceptable terms, or undermine our ability to successfully control the intellectual property necessary to protect our product candidates, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates. Uncertainties or disagreements around our rights under any such intellectual property may undermine our ability to partner our programs with third parties.

of our rights to certain intellectual property, or increasing what we believe to be our financial or other obligations under the DESRES Agreement, and any such outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Changes to the patent law in the United States and other jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our product candidates.

As is the case with other biopharmaceutical companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biopharmaceutical industry involve both technological and legal complexity and is therefore costly, time consuming and inherently uncertain. Recent patent reform legislation in the United States and other countries, including the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or Leahy-Smith Act, signed into law on September 16, 2011, could increase those uncertainties and costs. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted, redefine prior art and provide more efficient and cost-effective avenues for competitors to challenge the validity of patents. In addition, the Leahy-Smith Act has transformed the U.S. patent system into a “first to file” system. The first-to-file provisions, however, only became effective on March 16, 2013. Accordingly, it is not yet clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could make it more difficult to obtain patent protection for our inventions and increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances or weakening the rights of patent owners in certain situations. Additionally, there have been recent proposals for additional changes to the patent laws of the United States and other countries that, if adopted, could impact our ability to obtain patent protection for our proprietary technology or our ability to enforce rights in our proprietary technology. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the U.S. courts, the USPTO and the relevant law-making bodies in other countries, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce any patents that we may obtain in the future.

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations and may not adequately protect our business or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. For example:

Should any of these events occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, our product candidates, if approved, could be subject to post-market study requirements, marketing and labeling restrictions, and even recall or market withdrawal if unanticipated safety issues are discovered following approval. In addition, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement action if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements.

If the FDA or a ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, establishment registration and listing, as well as continued compliance with cGMPs and GCPs for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval and applicable product tracking and tracing requirements. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses.

If any of our product candidates are approved and we are found to have improperly promoted off-label uses of those products, we may become subject to significant liability. The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate the promotional claims that may be made about approved prescription drug products. In particular, while the FDA permits the dissemination of truthful and non-misleading information about an approved product, a manufacturer may not promote a product for uses that are not approved by the FDA. If we are found to have promoted such off-label uses, we may become subject to significant liability. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion of regulated products for off-label uses and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees, corporate integrity agreements or permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct must be changed or curtailed. If we cannot successfully manage the promotion of our product candidates, if approved, we could become subject to significant liability, which would materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

European data collection is governed by restrictive regulations governing the ~~use,~~ processing and cross-border transfer of personal information.

In the event we decide to conduct clinical trials or continue to enroll subjects in our ongoing or future clinical trials, we may be subject to additional ~~privacy~~data collection restrictions. For example, the collection, use, storage, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal data ~~regarding~~of individuals in the ~~EU,~~EEA, including personal health data, is subject to the ~~EU General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, and such activity~~

~~regarding individuals in the United Kingdom is subject to analogous UK law.~~GDPR. The GDPR ~~and the analogous UK law are~~is wide-ranging in scope and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process personal data, including requirements relating to processing health and other sensitive data, ~~obtaining consent of~~providing notice to the individuals to whom the personal data relates ~~providing information to individuals~~ regarding data processing activities, implementing safeguards to protect the ~~security~~privacy and ~~confidentiality~~security of personal data, providing notification of data breaches in certain circumstances, and taking certain measures when engaging third-party ~~processors.~~processors or sub-processors. The GDPR focuses on accountability of data controllers (such as us) and requires us to put in place all technical and organizational measures (privacy by design and by default) to ensure that we meet our

obligations. It also increases substantially the penalties to which we could be subject in the event of any non-compliance, including fines of up to €10,000,000 or up to 2% of our total worldwide annual turnover for certain comparatively minor offenses, or up to €20,000,000 or up to 4% of our total worldwide annual turnover for more serious offenses. Compliance with the GDPR ~~and analogous UK law~~ will be a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business or require us to change our business practices, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connection with our activities in ~~Europe~~the EEA. In addition, further to the UK’s exit from the EU on January 31, 2020, the GDPR ceased to apply in the UK at the end of the transition period on December 31, 2020. However, as of January 1, 2021, the UK’s European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 incorporated the GDPR (as it existed on December 31, 2020 but subject to certain UK specific amendments) into UK law, referred to as the UK GDPR. The UK GDPR and the ~~UK.~~UK Data Protection Act 2018 set out the UK’s data protection regime, which is independent from but aligned to the EU’s data protection regime. Non-compliance with the UK GDPR may result in monetary penalties of up to £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, whichever is higher. Although the UK is regarded as a third country under the EU’s GDPR, the European Commission has now issued a decision recognizing the UK as providing adequate protection under the EU GDPR and, therefore, transfers of personal data originating in the EU to the UK remain unrestricted. Like the EU GDPR, the UK GDPR restricts personal data transfers outside the UK to countries not regarded by the UK as providing adequate protection. The UK government has confirmed that personal data transfers from the UK to the EEA remain free flowing.

We must also ensure that we maintain adequate safeguards or have other legal bases to enable the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA and UK in compliance with the EU GDPR and UK GDPR, in particular for transfers to the United States. In 2020, in a ruling about the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, the Court of Justice of the EU raised questions about whether the European Commission’s Standard Contractual Clauses, or SCCs, can lawfully be used for personal data transfers from the EU to the United States or most other countries. Furthermore, on June 4, 2021, the European Commission issued new forms of SCCs for data transfers of personal data from controllers or processors in the EU (or otherwise subject to the GDPR) to controllers or processors established outside the EU. The new form of SCCs has replaced the SCCs that were adopted previously under the EU Data Protection Directive. We will be required to transition to the new form of SCCs when these safeguards are used as the basis for transferring personal data out of the EEA and doing so may require significant effort and cost. The new SCCs may also impact our business as companies based in Europe may be reluctant to utilize the new SCCs to legitimize transfers of personal data to third countries given the burdensome requirements of transfer impact assessments and the substantial obligations that the new SCCs impose upon exporters.

Additionally, with respect to the UK, the Information Commissioner’s Office, or ICO, has recently introduced new mechanisms for international transfers of personal data originating from the UK (an International Data Transfer Agreement, or IDTA, along with a separate addendum to the EU SCCs), which are in force as of March 21, 2022, to replace the old form EU SCCs for UK transfers. The new IDTA or the UK addendum must be used for any new contract entered into after September 21, 2022 and implemented in existing contracts that incorporate the prior version of the SCCs by March 21, 2024. We will be required to implement these new safeguards when these safeguards are used as the basis for transferring personal data out of the UK and doing so may require significant effort and cost.

If we are investigated by a European or UK data protection authority, we may face fines and other penalties. Any such investigation or charges by European or UK data protection authorities could have a negative effect on our business and on our ability to commercialize our products in the future, including with European, UK-based or multi-national pharmaceutical partners.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in other jurisdictions.

We may also submit marketing applications in other countries. Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain regulatory approval in any other jurisdiction, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. For example, even if the FDA grants marketing approval of a product candidate, ~~comparable~~similar regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion of the product candidate in those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In short, the foreign regulatory approval process involves all of the risks associated with FDA approval. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we may intend to charge for our products will also be subject to approval.

If we are unable to successfully validate, develop and obtain regulatory approval for companion diagnostic tests for our product candidates that require or would commercially benefit from such tests, or experience significant delays in doing so, we may not realize the full commercial potential of these product candidates.

In connection with the clinical development of our product candidates for certain indications, we may engage third parties to develop or obtain access to in vitro companion diagnostic tests to identify patient subsets within a disease category who may derive selective and meaningful benefit from our product candidates. Further, the FDA has indicated that if we continue RLY-4008 and RLY-2608 in a specific biomarker-defined population, a companion diagnostic device will be required to ensure ~~its~~their safe and effective use. Such companion diagnostics would be used during our clinical trials as well as in connection with the commercialization of our product candidates. To be successful, we or our collaborators will need to address a number of scientific, technical, regulatory and logistical challenges. The FDA and ~~comparable~~similar foreign regulatory authorities regulate in vitro companion diagnostics as medical devices and, under that regulatory framework, will likely require the conduct of clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of any diagnostics we may develop, which we expect will require separate regulatory clearance or approval prior to commercialization.

We intend to rely on third parties for the design, development and manufacture of companion diagnostic tests for our therapeutic product candidates that may require such tests. If we enter into such collaborative agreements, we will be dependent on the sustained cooperation and effort of our future collaborators in developing and obtaining approval for these companion diagnostics. It may be necessary to resolve issues such as selectivity/specificity, analytical validation, reproducibility, or clinical validation of companion diagnostics during the development and regulatory approval processes. Moreover, even if data from preclinical studies and early clinical trials appear to support development of a companion diagnostic for a product candidate, data generated in later clinical trials may fail to support the analytical and clinical validation of the companion diagnostic. We and our future collaborators may encounter difficulties in developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, manufacturing and commercializing companion diagnostics similar to those we face with respect to our therapeutic candidates themselves, including issues with achieving regulatory clearance or approval, production of sufficient quantities at commercial scale and with appropriate quality standards, and in gaining market acceptance. If we are unable to successfully develop companion diagnostics for these therapeutic product candidates, or experience delays in doing so, the development of these therapeutic product candidates may be adversely affected, these therapeutic product candidates may not obtain marketing approval, and we may not realize the full commercial potential of any of these therapeutics that obtain marketing approval. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially harmed. In addition, a diagnostic company with whom we contract may decide to discontinue selling or manufacturing the companion diagnostic test that we anticipate using in connection with development and commercialization of our product candidates or our relationship with such diagnostic company may otherwise terminate. We may not be able to enter into arrangements with another diagnostic company to obtain supplies of an alternative diagnostic test for use in connection with the development and commercialization of our product candidates or do so on commercially reasonable terms, which could adversely affect and/or delay the development or commercialization of our therapeutic candidates.

Laws and regulations governing any international operations we may have in the future may preclude us from developing, manufacturing and selling certain products outside of the United States and require us to develop and implement costly compliance programs.

If we expand our operations outside of the United States, we must dedicate additional resources to comply with numerous laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we plan to operate. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, prohibits any U.S. individual or business from paying, offering, authorizing payment or offering of anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official, political party or candidate for the purpose of influencing any act or decision of the foreign entity in order to assist the individual or business in obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also obligates companies whose securities are listed in the United States to comply with certain accounting provisions requiring the company to maintain books and records that accurately and fairly reflect all transactions of the corporation, including international subsidiaries, and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls for international operations.

Compliance with the FCPA is expensive and difficult, particularly in countries in which corruption is a recognized problem. In addition, the FCPA presents particular challenges in the pharmaceutical industry, because, in many countries, hospitals are operated by the government, and doctors and other hospital employees are considered foreign officials. Certain payments to hospitals in connection with clinical trials and other work have been deemed to be improper payments to government officials and have led to FCPA enforcement actions.

Various laws, regulations and executive orders also restrict the use and dissemination outside of the United States, or the sharing with certain non-U.S. nationals, of information classified for national security purposes, as well as certain products and technical data relating to those products. If we expand our presence outside of the United States, it will require us to dedicate additional resources to comply with these laws, and these laws may preclude us from developing, manufacturing, or selling certain products and product candidates outside of the United States, which could limit our growth potential and increase our development costs.

The failure to comply with laws governing international business practices may result in substantial civil and criminal penalties and suspension or debarment from government contracting. The SEC also may suspend or bar issuers from trading securities on U.S. exchanges for violations of the FCPA’s accounting provisions.

We are subject to certain U.S. and foreign anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, export control, sanctions, and other trade laws and regulations. We can face serious consequences for violations.

Among other matters, U.S. and foreign anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, export control, sanctions, and other trade laws and regulations, which are collectively referred to as Trade Laws, prohibit companies and their employees, agents, clinical research organizations, legal counsel, accountants, consultants, contractors, and other partners from authorizing, promising, offering, providing, soliciting, or receiving directly or indirectly, corrupt or improper payments or anything else of value to or from recipients in the public or private sector. Violations of Trade Laws can result in substantial criminal fines and civil penalties, imprisonment, the loss of trade privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm, and other consequences. We have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or government-affiliated hospitals, universities, and other organizations. We also expect our non-U.S. activities to increase in time. We plan to engage third parties for clinical trials and/or to obtain necessary permits, licenses, patent registrations, and other regulatory approvals and we can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of our personnel, agents, or partners, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have prior knowledge of such activities.

Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion from government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Although we do not currently have any products on the market, once we begin commercializing our product candidates, we will be subject to additional healthcare statutory and regulatory requirements and enforcement by the federal government and the states and governments of foreign ~~governments~~jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute our product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:

Ensuring that our future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations could involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations, including anticipated activities to be conducted by our sales team, were to be found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, reputational harm, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our ~~operations.~~operations, as well as additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws. Further, defending against any such actions can be costly and time consuming, and may require significant financial and personnel resources. Therefore, even if we are successful in defending against any such actions that may be brought against us, our business may be impaired. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare ~~programs.~~programs and imprisonment. If any of the above occur, our ability to operate our business and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

We may seek priority review designation for one or more of our other product candidates, but we might not receive such designation, and even if we do, such designation may not lead to a faster regulatory review or approval process.

If the FDA determines that a product candidate offers a treatment for a serious condition and, if approved, the product would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness, the FDA may designate the product candidate for priority review. A priority review designation means that the goal for the FDA to review an application is six months, rather than the standard review period of ten months. We may request priority review for our product candidates. The FDA has broad discretion with respect to whether or not to grant priority review status to a product candidate, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for such designation or status, the FDA may decide not to grant it. Moreover, a priority review designation does not necessarily result in an expedited regulatory review or approval process or necessarily confer any advantage with respect to approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. Receiving priority review from the FDA does not guarantee approval within the six-month review cycle or at all.

We have obtained orphan drug designation for one of our product candidates. We may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our other product candidates as well, and we may be unsuccessful or may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including the potential for market exclusivity.

In January 2022, the FDA granted orphan drug designation to RLY-4008 for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. As part of our business strategy, we may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our other product candidates as well, and we may be unsuccessful. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and Europe, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population of 200,000 or more in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers.

Similarly, in ~~Europe,~~the EU, the European Commission, upon the recommendation of the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, grants orphan ~~drug~~ designation to promote the development of ~~drugs~~products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting not more than 5 in 10,000 persons in ~~Europe~~the EU and for which no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment has been authorized for marketing in the EU (or, if a method exists, the product would be of a significant benefit to those ~~affected)~~affected by the condition). Additionally, designation is granted for ~~drugs~~products intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition and when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the ~~drug~~product in ~~Europe~~the EU would begenerate sufficient return to justify the necessary investment in developing the ~~drug.~~product. In ~~Europe,~~the EU, orphan ~~drug~~ designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers.

Generally, if a drug with an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the drug is entitled to a period of marketing exclusivity, which precludes the FDA or the EMA from approving another marketing application for the same drug and indication for that time period, except in limited circumstances. The applicable period is seven years in the United States and ten years in Europe. The European exclusivity period can be reduced to six years if a drug no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation or if the drug is sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer justified.

Even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a drug, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the drug from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. In addition, a designated orphan drug may not receive orphan drug exclusivity if it is approved for a use that is broader than the indication for which it received orphan designation. Moreover, orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the drug to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition or if another drug with the same active moiety is determined to be safer, more effective, or represents a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug nor gives the drug any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process. ~~While~~We have obtained orphan drug designation for one of our product candidates and while we may seek orphan drug designation for our other product candidates, we may never receive such designations. Even if we do receive such designations, there is no guarantee that we will enjoy the benefits of those designations. In addition, the FDA may further reevaluate the Orphan Drug Act and its regulations and policies. We do not know if, when, or how the FDA may change the orphan drug regulations and policies in the future, and it is uncertain how any changes might affect our business. Depending on what changes the FDA may make to its orphan drug regulations and policies, our business could be adversely impacted.

Breakthrough therapy designation and fast track designation by the FDA, even if granted for any of our product candidates, may not lead to a faster development, regulatory review or approval process, and each designation does not increase the likelihood that any of our product candidates will receive marketing approval in the United States.

We may seek a breakthrough therapy designation for some of our product candidates. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. For drugs that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can help to identify the most efficient path for clinical development while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective control regimens. Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA may also be eligible for priority review and accelerated approval. Designation as a breakthrough therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the criteria for designation as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. In any event, the receipt of a breakthrough therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to therapies considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition,

even if one or more of our product candidates qualify as breakthrough therapies, the FDA may later decide that such product candidates no longer meet the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.

We may seek fast track designation for some of our product candidates. If a drug is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the drug demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug sponsor may apply for fast track designation. The FDA has broad discretion whether or not to grant this designation, so even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for this designation, we cannot assure you that the FDA would decide to grant it. Even if we do receive fast track designation, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. The FDA may withdraw fast track designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program. Fast track designation alone does not guarantee qualification for the FDA’s priority review procedures.

Accelerated approval by the FDA, even if granted for our FGFR2 program or our PI3K program or any other future product candidates, may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process and it does not increase the likelihood that our product candidates will receive marketing approval.

We may seek accelerated approval of our FGFR2 program or our PI3K program and for future product candidates. A product may be eligible for accelerated approval if it treats a serious or life-threatening condition and generally provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies. In addition, it must demonstrate an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit. As a condition of approval, the FDA may require that a sponsor of a drug or biologic receiving accelerated approval perform adequate and well-controlled post-marketing clinical trials. In addition, the FDA currently requires as a condition for accelerated approval, unless otherwise ~~approved~~informed by the agency, pre-approval of promotional materials for products receiving accelerated approval, which could adversely impact the timing of the commercial launch of the product. Even if we do receive accelerated approval, we may not experience a faster development or regulatory review or approval process, and receiving accelerated approval does not provide assurance of ultimate FDA approval.

The FDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities may implement additional regulations or restrictions on the development and commercialization of our product candidates, and such changes can be difficult to predict.

The FDA, the EMA and regulatory authorities in other countries have each expressed interest in further regulating biotechnology products. Agencies at both the federal and state level in the United States, as well as the U.S. Congressional committees and other governments or governing agencies, have also expressed interest in further regulating the biotechnology industry. Such action may delay or prevent commercialization of some or all of our product candidates. Adverse developments in clinical trials of products conducted by others may cause the FDA or other oversight bodies to change the requirements for approval of any of our product candidates. These regulatory review agencies and committees and the new requirements or guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studies or trials, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. As we advance our product candidates, we will be required to consult with these regulatory agencies and comply with applicable requirements and guidelines. If we fail to do so, we may be required to delay or discontinue development of such product candidates. These additional processes may result in a review and approval process that is longer than we otherwise would have expected. Delays as a result of an increased or lengthier regulatory approval process or further restrictions on the development of our product candidates can be costly and could negatively impact our ability to complete clinical trials and commercialize our current and future product candidates in a timely manner, if at all.

Healthcare legislative reform measures may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of our current or future product candidates or any future product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell a product for which we obtain marketing approval. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements, (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling, (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business. In the United States, there have been and continue to be a number of legislative initiatives to contain healthcare costs. For example, in March 2010, the Affordable Care Act, or the ACA, was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacted the United States pharmaceutical industry. The ACA, among other things, subjects biological products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars, addresses a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected, increases the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate

program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations, establishes annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs, and creates a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% (increased to 70% pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, effective as of 2019) point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D. Since then, the ACA risk adjustment program payment parameters have been updated annually.

Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and we expect there will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. On June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the most recent judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision, President Biden issued an executive order to initiate a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA.

On December 20, 2019, the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 1865) was signed into law, which repealed the so called “Cadillac” tax on certain high cost employer sponsored insurance plans, the health insurance provider tax, and the medical device excise tax. It is impossible to determine whether similar taxes could be instated in the future. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, also amended the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, by increasing the point-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and closing the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” CMS published a final rule permitting further collections and payments to and from certain ACA qualified health plans and health insurance issuers under the ACA risk adjustment program in response to the outcome of federal district court litigation regarding the method CMS uses to determine this risk adjustment. In addition, CMS has recently published a final rule that would give states greater flexibility, starting in 2020, in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This includes aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers up to 2% per fiscal year, and, due to subsequent legislative amendments, will remain in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken; however, pursuant to the CARES Act and subsequent legislation, these reductions have been suspended from May 1, 2020 through ~~December~~March 31, ~~2021~~2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A 1% payment reduction is occurring from April 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022, and the 2% payment reduction will resume on July 1, 2022. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 among other things, reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals, imaging centers and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. On May 30, 2018, the Right to Try Act, was signed into law. The law, among other things, provides a federal framework for certain patients to access certain investigational new product candidates that have completed a Phase 1 clinical trial and that are undergoing investigation for FDA approval. Under certain circumstances, eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical trials and without obtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded access program. There is no obligation for a pharmaceutical manufacturer to make its product candidates available to eligible patients as a result of the Right to Try Act. In May 2019, CMS issued a final rule to allow Medicare Advantage Plans the option of using step therapy, a type of prior authorization, for Part B drugs beginning January 1, 2020. This final rule codified CMS’s policy change that was effective January 1, 2019. It is unclear whether the current administration will challenge, reverse, revoke or otherwise modify these executive and administrative actions after January 20, 2021.

There has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to specialty drug pricing practices. At a federal level, President Biden signed an Executive Order on July 9, 2021 affirming the administration’s policy to (i) support legislative reforms that would lower the prices of prescription drug and biologics, including by allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, by imposing inflation caps, and by supporting the development and market entry of lower-cost generic drugs and biosimilars; and (ii) support the enactment of a public health insurance option. Among other things, the Executive Order also directs the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, to provide a report on actions to combat excessive pricing of prescription drugs, enhance the domestic drug supply chain, reduce the price that the Federal government pays for drugs, and address price gouging in the industry; and directs the FDA to work with states and Indian Tribes that propose to develop section 804 Importation Programs in accordance with the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, and the FDA’s implementing regulations. The FDA released such implementing regulations on September 24, 2020, which went into effect on November 30, 2020, providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada. On September 25, 2020, CMS stated drugs imported by states under this rule will not be eligible for federal rebates under Section 1927 of the Social Security Act and manufacturers would not report these drugs for “best price” or Average Manufacturer Price purposes. Since these drugs are not considered covered outpatient drugs, CMS further stated it will not publish a National Average Drug Acquisition Cost for these drugs. If implemented, importation of drugs from Canada may materially and adversely affect the price we receive for any of our product candidates. Further, on November 20, 2020, CMS issued an Interim Final Rule implementing the Most Favored Nation, or MFN, Model under which Medicare Part B reimbursement rates would have been calculated for certain drugs and biologicals based on the lowest price drug manufacturers receive in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries with a similar gross domestic product per capita. However, on ~~August 6,~~December 29, 2021, CMS ~~announced a proposed rule to rescind~~rescinded the MFN rule. Additionally, on November 30, 2020, HHS published a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from

pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers. Pursuant to court order, the removal and addition of the aforementioned safe harbors have been delayed until January 1, ~~2023. Further, implementation~~2026. Although a number of these ~~changes~~ and ~~new safe harbors for point-of-sale reductions in price for prescription pharmaceutical products~~other proposed measures may require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, and ~~pharmacy benefit manager service fees are currently under review by~~the Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, both the Biden administration and ~~may be amended or repealed.~~

~~In addition, there~~Congress have ~~been several changes~~indicated that they will continue to the 340B drug pricing program, which imposes ceilings on prices that drug manufacturers can charge for medications sold to certain health care facilities. On December 27, 2018, the District Court for the District of Columbia invalidated a reimbursement formula change under the 340B drug pricing program, and CMS subsequently altered the FYs 2019 and 2018 reimbursement formula on specified covered outpatient drugs, or SCODs. The court ruled this change was not an “adjustment” which was within the Secretary’s discretion to make but was instead a fundamental change in the reimbursement calculation. However, most recently, on July 31, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned the district court’s decision and found that the changes were within the Secretary’s authority. On September 14, 2020, the plaintiffs-appellees filed a Petition for Rehearing En Banc (i.e., before the full court), but was denied on October 16, 2020. Plaintiffs-appellees filed a petition for a writ of certiorari at the Supreme Court on February 10, 2021. On July 2, 2021, the Supreme Court granted the petition. It is unclear how these developments could affect covered

hospitals who might purchase our future products and affect the rates we may charge such facilities for our approved products in the future, if any.At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designedseek new legislative measures to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional health care authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug ~~and other health care programs. These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products, once approved, or put pressure on our product pricing.~~costs.

We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our current or future product candidates or additional pricing pressures. In particular any policy changes through CMS as well as local state Medicaid programs could have a significant impact on our business in light of the higher proportion of SCD patients that utilize Medicare and Medicaid programs to pay for treatments.

Our revenue prospects could be affected by changes in healthcare spending and policy in the United States and abroad. We operate in a highly regulated industry and new laws, regulations or judicial decisions, or new interpretations of existing laws, regulations or decisions, related to healthcare availability, the method of delivery or payment for healthcare products and services could negatively impact our business, operations and financial condition.

There have been, and likely will continue to be, legislative and regulatory proposals at the foreign, federal and state levels directed at broadening the availability of healthcare and containing or lowering the cost of healthcare. We cannot predict the initiatives that may be adopted in the future, including repeal, replacement or significant revisions to the ACA. The continuing efforts of the government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls may adversely affect:

Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors, which may adversely affect our future profitability.

Recent federal legislation and actions by federal, state and local governments may permit reimportation of drugs from foreign countries into the United States, including foreign countries where the drugs are sold at lower prices than in the United States, which could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We may face competition in the United States for our development candidates and investigational medicines, if approved, from therapies sourced from foreign countries that have placed price controls on pharmaceutical products. In the United States, the Medicare Modernization Act, or MMA, contains provisions that call for the promulgation of regulations that expand pharmacists’ and wholesalers’ ability to import cheaper versions of an approved drug and competing products from Canada, where there are government price controls. Further, the MMA provides that these changes to U.S. importation laws will not take effect, unless and until the Secretary of the HHS certifies that the changes will pose no additional risk to the public’s health and safety and will result in a significant reduction in the cost of products to consumers. On September 23, 2020, the Secretary of the HHS made such certification to Congress, and on October 1, 2020, FDA published a final rule that allows for the importation of certain prescription drugs from Canada. Under the final rule, States and Indian Tribes, and in certain future circumstances pharmacists and wholesalers, may submit importation program proposals to the FDA for review and authorization. On September 25, 2020, CMS stated drugs imported by States under this rule will not be eligible for federal rebates under Section 1927 of the Social Security Act and manufacturers would not report these drugs for “best price” or Average Manufacturer Price purposes. Since these drugs are not considered covered outpatient drugs, CMS further stated it will not publish a National Average Drug Acquisition Cost for these drugs. Separately, the FDA also issued a final guidance document outlining a pathway for manufacturers to obtain an additional National Drug Code, or NDC, for an FDA-approved drug that was originally intended to be marketed in a foreign country and that was authorized for sale in that foreign country. The market implications of the final rule and guidance are unknown at this time. Proponents of drug reimportation may attempt to pass legislation that would directly allow reimportation under certain circumstances. Legislation or regulations allowing the reimportation of drugs, if enacted, could decrease the price we receive for any products that we may develop and adversely affect our future revenues and prospects for profitability.

Disruptions at the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies caused by funding shortages or global health concerns could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business.

The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, global health concerns, ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory, and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For example, over the last several years the U.S. government has shut down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, have had to furlough critical government employees and stop critical activities. Separately, in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, since March 2020 when foreign and domestic inspections of facilities were largely placed on hold, the FDA has been working to resume routine surveillance, bioresearch monitoring and pre-approval inspections on a prioritized basis. The FDA has developed a rating system to assist in determining when and where it is safest to conduct prioritized domestic inspections. As of May 2021, certain inspections, such as foreign preapproval, surveillance, and for-cause inspections that are not deemed mission-critical, remain temporarily postponed. InSince April 2021, the FDA ~~issued guidance for industry formally announcing plans to employ~~has conducted limited inspections and employed remote interactive evaluations, using risk management methods, to meet user fee commitments and goal ~~dates~~dates. Ongoing travel restrictions and ~~in May 2021, announced plans~~other uncertainties continue to ~~continue progress toward resuming~~impact oversight operations both domestic and abroad and it is unclear when standard operational ~~levels.~~levels will resume. The FDA is continuing to complete mission-critical work, prioritize other higher-tiered inspectional needs (e.g., for-cause inspections), and carry out surveillance inspections using risk-based approaches for evaluating public health. Should ~~the~~ FDA determine that an inspection is necessary for approval and an inspection cannot be completed during the review cycle due to restrictions on travel, and the FDA does not determine a remote interactive evaluation to be adequate, the agency has stated that it generally intends to issue, depending on the circumstances, a complete response letter or defer action on the application until an inspection can be completed. ~~In 2020 and 2021,~~During the COVID-19 public health emergency, a number of companies announced receipt of complete response letters due to the FDA’s inability to complete required inspections for their applications. Regulatory authorities outside the ~~United States~~U.S. may adopt similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to the ongoing COVID-19 ~~pandemic.~~pandemic and may experience delays in their regulatory activities. Additionally, as of May 26, 2021, the FDA noted it is continuing to ensure timely reviews of applications for medical products during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in line with its user fee performance goals. However, the FDA may not be able to continue its current pace and approval timelines could be extended, including where a pre-approval inspection or an inspection of clinical sites is required and due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and any travel restrictions, the FDA is unable to complete such required inspections during the review period. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns continue to prevent the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, in our operations as a public company, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.

Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives and experienced scientists and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

We are highly dependent on the research and development, clinical and business development expertise of the principal members of our management, scientific and clinical team. Although we have entered into employment letter agreements with our executive officers, each of them may terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not maintain “key person” insurance for any of our executives or other employees. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, our ability to pursue our growth strategy will be limited.

Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, clinical, manufacturing and sales and marketing personnel will also be critical to our success. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees, including temporary loss due to illness, could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives and seriously harm our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Furthermore, replacing executive officers and key employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the breadth of skills and experience required to successfully develop, gain regulatory approval of and commercialize products. Competition to hire from this limited pool is intense, and we may be unable to hire,

train, retain or motivate these key personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions. Failure to succeed in clinical trials may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified scientific personnel.

In particular, we have experienced a very competitive hiring environment in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where we are headquartered. Many of the other pharmaceutical companies that we compete against for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than we do. They also may provide more diverse opportunities and better chances

for career advancement. Some of these characteristics may be more appealing to high-quality candidates than what we have to offer. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high-quality personnel, the rate and success with which we can discover and develop product candidates and our business will be limited.

Our employees, principal investigators, CROs and consultants may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.

We are exposed to the risk that our employees, principal investigators, CROs and consultants may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless and/or negligent conduct or disclosure of unauthorized activities to us that violate the regulations of the FDA and other regulatory authorities, including those laws requiring the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to such authorities; healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations in the United States and abroad; or laws that require the reporting of financial information or data accurately. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Activities subject to these laws also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials or creating fraudulent data in our preclinical or other nonclinical studies or clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. We have adopted a code of conduct applicable to all of our employees, but it is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct by employees and other third parties, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. Additionally, we are subject to the risk that a person could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.

We expect to expand our development and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had ~~232~~276 full-time employees. We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly ~~as we function as a public company and~~ in the areas of ~~product~~pharmaceutical and clinical development, regulatory affairs and, if any of our product candidates receives marketing approval, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

We may acquire additional businesses or products, form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. If we acquire businesses with promising markets or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We may encounter numerous difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new products resulting from a strategic alliance or acquisition that delay or prevent us from realizing their expected benefits or enhancing our business. We cannot assure you that, following any such acquisition, we will achieve the expected synergies to justify the transaction.

Our acquisitions expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business, and we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of acquisitions of businesses or technologies.

As a part of our growth strategy, we may make selected acquisitions of complementary products and/or businesses, such as our acquisition of ZebiAI in April 2021. Any acquisition involves numerous risks and operational, financial, and managerial challenges, including the following, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations:

In addition, the successful integration of acquired businesses requires significant efforts and expense across all operational areas. There can be no assurance that any of the acquisitions we may make, including our acquisition of ZebiAI, will be successful or will be, or will remain, profitable. Our failure to successfully address the foregoing risks may prevent us from achieving the anticipated benefits from any acquisition in a reasonable time frame, or at all.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyber-attacks or deficiencies in our or related parties’ cyber security.

Given our limited operating history, we are still in the process of implementing our internal security measures. Our internal computer systems and those of current and future third parties on which we rely may fail and are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, ransomware attacks and other unauthorized access. Our information technology and other internal infrastructure systems, including corporate firewalls, servers, leased lines and connection to the Internet, face the risk of systemic failure that could disrupt our operations. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Likewise, we rely on third parties for the manufacture of our product ~~candidate or any future product~~ candidates and to conduct clinical trials, and similar events relating to their computer systems could also have a material adverse effect on our business. The risk of cyber incidents could also be increased by cyberwarfare in connection with the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, including potential proliferation of malware into systems unrelated to the conflict. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability, our competitive position could be harmed, ~~and~~ the further development and commercialization of our product candidate or any future product candidates could be hindered or ~~delayed.~~delayed, we could be required to expend significant amounts of money and other resources to repair or replace our information systems or networks, the market perception of the

effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and our reputation and credibility could be damaged. In addition, in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, part of our workforce is currently working remotely. This could increase our cyber security risk, create data accessibility concerns, and make us more susceptible to communication disruptions.

If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.

Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses, we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.

Our current operations are located in Massachusetts; however, we rely on third parties, including those that are located outside the United States, and we or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by natural disasters or other unplanned events and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.

Our current operations are located in Massachusetts. Any unplanned event, such as flood, fire, explosion, earthquake, extreme weather condition, medical epidemics, including any potential effects from the current global spread of COVID-19, global conflicts such as the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine, power shortage, telecommunication failure or other natural or man-made accidents or incidents that result in us being unable to fully utilize our facilities, or the ~~manufacturing~~ facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers or CROs, may have a material and adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. Loss of access to these facilities may result in increased costs, delays in the development of our product candidates or interruption of our business operations.

Natural disasters or pandemics such as the ongoing COVID-19 ~~outbreak~~pandemic could further disrupt our operations and have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our headquarters, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as our research facilities or the ~~manufacturing~~ facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers or CROs, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible, for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place may prove inadequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance coverage at levels that we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident or incident at these facilities, we cannot assure our investors that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and losses. If our facilities or the ~~manufacturing~~ facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers or CROs are unable to operate because of an accident or incident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our research and development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Commencing December 31, 2021, we will no longer be an “emerging growth company” or a “smaller reporting company” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will no longer apply to us.

We are currently an emerging growth company but because as of June 30, 2021, the market value of our common stock that was held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million, we will no longer qualify for such status commencing December 31, 2021. As a large-accelerated filer, we will be subject to certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that have not been applicable to us as an emerging growth company. These requirements include:

We are also currently a smaller reporting company, but based on the market value of our common stock that was held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2021, we have determined that we will no longer be a smaller reporting company as of January 1, 2022. However, for so long as we remain a smaller reporting company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not smaller reporting companies. Similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosure and have certain other reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, being required to provide only two years of audited financial statements and not being required to provide selected financial data, supplemental financial information or risk factors. After January 1, 2022, we will no longer be able to rely on these reduced requirements.

The trading price of our common stock historically has been volatile, which may affect the price at which you could sell any shares of our common stock. Securities class action or other litigation involving our company or members of our management team could also substantially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The market price for our common stock historically has been volatile and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors. Since shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public offering, or IPO, in July 2020 at a price of $20.00 per share, our stock price has fluctuated significantly, ranging from an intraday low of ~~$25.72~~$19.05 to an intraday high of $64.37 through ~~November 8, 2021.~~May 2, 2022. This volatility may affect the price at which you could resell the common stock. Our stock price is likely to continue to be volatile and subject to significant price and volume fluctuations in response to market and other factors, including the factors described below. The ~~stock market~~

stock market in general and Nasdaq and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies.

Our stock price is likely to be volatile. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

If an active market for our common stock does not continue, it may be difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares without depressing the market price for the shares or sell their shares at or above the prices at which they acquired their shares or sell their shares at the time they would like to sell. Any inactive trading market for our common stock may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund our operations by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using our shares as ~~consideration~~consideration..

Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

Our executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and their affiliates exercise significant control over our company, which will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.

As of ~~September 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the holdings of our executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and their affiliates, ~~including entities affiliated with SoftBank Vision Fund and FMR LLC~~ represented beneficial ownership, in the aggregate, of approximately ~~46.1%~~56.3% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders, if they act together, will be able to influence our management and affairs and control the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and any sale, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. These stockholders may have interests, with respect to their common stock, that are different from those of our public market investors and the concentration of

voting power among these stockholders may have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock. In addition, this concentration of ownership might adversely affect the market price of our common stock by:

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the IRC, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in the ownership of its equity over a three year period), the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and certain other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. We may ~~have experienced such ownership changes in the past, and we may~~ experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership. As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately ~~$174.0~~$466.2 million, and our ability to utilize those net operating loss carryforwards could be limited by an “ownership change” as described above.

Comprehensive tax reform legislation could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect us or holders of our common stock. In recent years, many changes have been made and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future.

Additional changes to U.S. federal income tax law are currently being contemplated, and future changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of operations. It cannot be predicted whether, when, in what form, or with what effective dates, new tax laws may be enacted, or regulations and rulings may be enacted, promulgated or issued under existing or new tax laws, which could result in an increase in our or our stockholders’ tax liability or require changes in the manner in which we operate in order to minimize or mitigate any adverse effects of changes in tax law or in the interpretation thereof. You are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the implications of potential changes in tax laws on an investment in our common stock.

~~Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.~~

We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company, and particularly ~~after~~since we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we ~~will~~have incurred and expect to incur significant legal, accounting and other ~~expenses that we did not incur as a private company.~~expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. ~~For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.~~

Pursuant to Section 404, we ~~will be~~are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial ~~reporting, including~~reporting. Because we are no longer an emerging growth company, we are required to include with our annual reports an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting ~~firm commencing with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021 as we will no longer be an “emerging growth company” as of this date.~~firm. To achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, we have been and will continue to be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that neither we nor our independent registered public accounting firm will be able to conclude within the prescribed timeframe that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section ~~404.~~404 or that we will not be able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. In addition, if we are not able to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on Nasdaq.

Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

We designed our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the

control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our board of directors that our stockholders might consider favorable. Some of these provisions include:

In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporate Law, which may prohibit certain business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions in our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors and could also delay or impede a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing or cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our amended and restated bylaws designate specific courts as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

Pursuant to our amended and restated bylaws, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for any state law claims for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (2) any action asserting a claim of or based on a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of ours to us or our stockholders; (3) any action asserting a claim pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; or (4) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, or the Delaware Forum Provision. The Delaware Forum Provision will not apply to any causes of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Our amended and restated bylaws further provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts shall be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, or the Federal Forum Provision. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision; provided, however, that

stockholders cannot and will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

We recognize that the Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision in our amended and restated bylaws may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims, particularly if the stockholders do not reside in or near the State of Delaware or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Additionally, the forum selection clauses in our amended and restated bylaws may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage the filing of lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees, even though an action, if

successful, might benefit our stockholders. In addition, while the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court are “facially valid” under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce our Federal Forum Provision. If the Federal Forum Provision is found to be unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters. The Federal Forum Provision may also impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert that the provision is not enforceable or invalid. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than our stockholders.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts covering our stock downgrade their evaluations of our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the trading price of our stock may decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.


Delaware		47-3923475
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

~~Large accelerated filer~~	☐	~~Accelerated filer~~	☐

~~Non-accelerated~~Large accelerated filer	☒	~~Smaller reporting company~~Accelerated filer	☒☐

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐

		Emerging growth company	☒☐


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)		1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021		1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~		2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Convertible Preferred Stock and~~ Stockholders’ Equity ~~(Deficit)~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~2020~~2021		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~		54
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		65
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1612
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		2620
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		2620
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION		2722
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		2722
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		2722
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		6664
Item 5.	Other Information		6664
Item 6.	Exhibits		6765
Signatures			6866


☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Balance at December 31, 2020	$	—
Contingent consideration related to acquisition of ZebiAI		43,465
Increase in fair value of contingent payments		2,000
Balance at September 30, 2021	$	45,465

	September 30, 2021
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Investments:
U.S treasury bills	$	117,993	$	13	$	—		$	118,006
U.S agency securities		29,497		1		—			29,498
Total investments with a maturity of one year or less		147,490		14		—			147,504

U.S treasury bills		138,675		—		(13	)		138,662
U.S agency securities		101,774		9		—			101,783
Total investments with a maturity of one to two years		240,449		9		(13	)		240,445
Total investments	$	387,939	$	23	$	(13	)	$	387,949

	December 31, 2020
	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Investments:
U.S treasury bills	$	29,997	$	21	$	—	$	30,018
U.S agency securities		20,996	5			—		21,001
Total investments with a maturity of one year or less		50,993		26		—		51,019

U.S treasury bills		3,008		—		—		3,008
U.S agency securities		176,350	38			—		176,388
Total investments with a maturity of one to two years		179,358		38		—		179,396
Total investments	$	230,351	$	64	$	—	$	230,415

Acquired IPR&D asset	$	123,000
Loss on initial consolidation of VIE		11,855
Assets obtained in asset acquisition		662
Liabilities assumed in asset acquisition		(2,330	)
Intangible asset		2,300
Net acquired assets	$	135,487

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2021		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
	(in thousands)
External costs for programs in clinical trials	$	3,555	$	10,522
External costs for all programs in discovery and pre-clinical studies		17,962		47,792
External costs for platform research and other research and development activities		4,498		11,651
Employee related expenses		18,959		50,778
Total research and development expenses	$	44,974	$	120,743