UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

 

 xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 20172018

or

 ¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ______to______.

 

  XG SCIENCES, INC.  
  (Exact name of registrant as
specified in its
charter)
  

Michigan 333-209131 20-4998896
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (Commission File No.) (I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)

3101 Grand Oak Drive

Lansing, MI 48911

 

(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

 

(517) 703-1110

(Issuer Telephone number)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☐Yes No

(Note: Registrant is a voluntary filer of reports required to be filed by certain companies under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has filed all reports that would have been required during the preceding 12 months, had it been subject to such filing requirements.)¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting companyþ
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 Emerging growth companyþ

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has not elected to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes  No

 

As of November 13, 2017,7, 2018, there were 2,213,3503,745,018 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.stock outstanding.

 Explanatory Note

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A has been amended solely to revise an estimate related to expected revenue contained in Item 2 of the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2018. Other than the foregoing, this amended report speaks as of the original filing of our Form 10-Q and has not been updated to reflect events occurring subsequent to the original filing date. Pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the certifications required pursuant to Section 302 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, have been re-executed and re-filed as of the date of this amended report and are included as exhibits hereto.



XG SCIENCES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

September 30, 20172018

INDEX

 

PART I 
   
ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS4
   
ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS1815
   
ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK2927
   
ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES2928
   
PART II 
   
ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS3028
   
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS3028
   
ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS3028
   
ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES3028
   
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES3028
   
ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION3028
   
ITEM 6.EXHIBITS3129
   
SIGNATURES3230


 



2

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

The information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) relating to XG Sciences, Inc., a Michigan corporation and its subsidiary, XG Sciences IP, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company (collectively referred to as “we”, “us”, “our”, “XG Sciences”, “XGS”, or the “Company”), which are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects and plans and objectives of management. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the risks set forth on beginning on page 1413 under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 56 (declared effective April 14, 2017)June 26, 2018) to our registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-209131) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 12, 2016,June 1, 2018, and originally declared effective onJune 26, 2018 (the “Registration Statement”), and the risks set forth on beginning on page 13 under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 13, 2016 (the “Existing Registration Statement”).2, 2018. 

 


XG SCIENCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

 

  September 30,
2017
  December 31,
 2016
 
       (Restated) 
ASSETS        
         
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash $1,317,761  $1,785,343 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,000 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016  378,686   99,078 
Inventory  193,223   205,973 
Incentive refunds receivable     165,635 
Other current assets  194,864   174,495 
Total current assets  2,084,534   2,430,524 
         
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET  2,648,624   2,886,421 
         
RESTRICTED CASH FOR LETTER OF CREDIT  195,718   195,499 
         
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET  561,719   478,019 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $5,490,595  $5,990,463 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and other liabilities $667,605  $964,757 
Deferred revenue     6,428 
Current portion of capital lease obligations  159,628   268,667 
Total current liabilities  827,233   1,239,852 
         
LONG TERM LIABILITIES        
Long term portion of capital lease obligations  31,311   115,106 
Long term debt  3,814,703   1,862,120 
Derivative liability – warrants     249,807 
Total long term liabilities  3,846,014   2,227,033 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  4,673,247   3,466,885 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Series A convertible preferred stock, 3,000,000 shares authorized, 1,850,676 and 1,829,256 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation value of $22,208,112 and $21,951,072 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  21,831,374   21,574,360 
Series B Preferred Stock, 1,500,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation value of $0 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016      
Common stock, no par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 2,162,725 and 1,885,175 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  17,562,267   15,647,839 
Additional paid in capital  7,677,319   6,490,230 
Accumulated (deficit)  (46,253,612)  (41,188,851)
Total stockholders’ equity  817,348   2,523,578 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $5,490,595  $5,990,463 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

 


3

XG SCIENCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)BALANCE SHEETS

 

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months ended
 September 30,
 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
     (Restated)      (Restated) 
REVENUE                
Product sales $446,795  $88,856  $863,574  $230,635 
Grants  25,466   50,111   124,955   208,475 
Licensing revenue     25,000   50,000   75,000 
Total revenue  472,261   163,967   1,038,529   514,110 
                 
COST OF GOODS SOLD                
Direct costs  266,462   44,344   476,774   101,397 
Unallocated manufacturing expenses  449,799   323,051   1,236,101   1,071,000 
Total cost of goods sold  716,261   367,395   1,712,875   1,172,397 
                 
GROSS LOSS  (244,000)  (203,428)  (674,346)  (658,287)
                 
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Research and development  215,949   231,312   706,575   866,668 
Sales, general and administrative  1,466,505   896,650   3,386,857   2,618,252 
Total operating expenses  1,682,454   1,127,962   4,093,432   3,484,920 
                 
OPERATING LOSS  (1,926,454)  (1,331,390)  (4,767,778)  (4,143,207)
                 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                
Interest expense, net  (62,814)  (55,816)  (176,347)  (240,588)
Gain (Loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability – warrants  (43,154)  26,738   (46,612)  50,799 
Government incentives     24,000   (74,024)  72,000 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets     (18,609)     (18,609)
Total other income (expense)  (105,968)  (23,687)  (296,983)  (136,398)
                 
NET LOSS $(2,032,422) $(1,355,077) $(5,064,761) $(4,279,605)
                 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING –Basic and diluted

 $2,110,546  $914,648  $2,028,373  $959,904 
                 
NET LOSS PER SHARE – Basic and diluted $(.96) $(1.48) $(2.50) $(4.46)
  September 30,
2018
 December 31,
 2017
ASSETS (unaudited)  
CURRENT ASSETS        
Cash $3,262,554  $2,845,798 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $65,000 at September 30, 2018 and $40,000 at December 31, 2017  868,496   468,623 
Inventories  255,822   171,864 
Other current assets  132,295   15,781 
Total current assets  4,519,167   3,502,066 
         
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET  4,651,474   2,601,571 
         
RESTRICTED CASH FOR LETTER OF CREDIT  190,068   195,792 
         
LEASE DEPOSIT  20,156   20,156 
         
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET  657,546   571,938 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $10,038,411  $6,891,523 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $1,257,705  $858,077 
Deferred revenue  —     7,298 
Current portion of capital lease obligations  34,881   118,553 
Total current liabilities  1,292,586   983,928 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES        
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations  12,833   15,527 
Long term debt  5,023,505   4,794,596 
Total long-term liabilities  5,036,338   4,810,123 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES  6,328,924   5,794,051 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Series A convertible preferred stock, 3,000,000 shares authorized, 1,882,759 and 1,857,816 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation value of $22,593,108 and $22,293,792 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively  22,216,343   21,917,046 
Common stock, no par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 3,331,018 and 2,353,350 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively  26,817,412   19,116,012 
Additional paid-in capital  8,032,938   7,831,958 
Accumulated deficit  (53,357,206)  (47,767,544)
Total stockholders’ equity  3,709,487   1,097,472 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $10,038,411  $6,891,523 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


4

XG SCIENCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

  For the Three Months ended
September 30,
 For the Nine Months ended
 September 30,
  2018 2017 2018 2017
         
REVENUE                
Product sales $1,126,385  $446,795  $2,863,575  $863,574 
Grants  —     25,466   —     124,955 
Licensing revenue  —     —     —     50,000 
Total revenue  1,126,385   472,261   2,863,575   1,038,529 
                 
COST OF GOODS SOLD                
Direct costs  708,249   266,462   1,739,700   476,774 
Unallocated manufacturing expenses  544,867   449,799   1,834,138   1,236,101 
Total cost of goods sold  1,253,116   716,261   3,573,838   1,712,875 
                 
GROSS LOSS  (126,731)  (244,000)  (710,263)  (674,346)
                 
OPERATING EXPENSES                
Research and development  435,956   215,949   1,000,101   706,575 
Sales, general and administrative  1,297,179   1,466,505   3,631,652   3,386,857 
Total operating expenses  1,733,135   1,682,454   4,631,753   4,093,432 
                 
OPERATING LOSS  (1,859,866)  (1,926,454)  (5,342,016)  (4,767,778)
                 
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                
Interest expense, net  (81,926   (62,814)  (250,900)  (176,347)
Loss from change in fair value of derivative liability – warrants      (43,154)  —     (46,612)
Government incentives, net      —     3,253   (74,024)
Total other expense  (81,926)  (105,968)  (247,647)  (296,983)
                 
NET LOSS  (1,941,792) $(2,032,422) $(5,589,663) $(5,064,761)
                 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING –

Basic and diluted

  3,044,815   2,110,546   2,716,713   2,028,373 
                 
NET LOSS PER SHARE – Basic and diluted  (0.64) $(0.96) $(2.06) $(2.50)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

5

   

XG SCIENCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(unaudited)

 

 Preferred stock (A)  Common stock  Additional
paid-in
  Accumulated     Preferred stock (A) Common stock Additional
paid-in
 Accumulated  
 Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  Total  Shares Amount Shares Amount capital deficit Total
Balances, December 31, 2016 (Restated)– see note 2  1,829,256  $21,574,360   1,885,175  $15,647,839  $6,490,230  $(41,188,851) $2,523,578 
Reclassification of warrant liabilities to equity              296,419      296,419 
Balances, December 31, 2017  1,857,816  $21,917,046   2,353,350  $19,116,012  $7,831,958  $(47,767,544) $1,097,472 
Stock issued for cash        267,550   2,140,400         2,140,400   —     —     967,668   7,741,344   —     —     7,741,344 
Stock issuance fees and expenses           (245,972)        (245,972)  —     —     —     (99,943)  —     —     (99,943)
Warrants issued with Dow Financings              145,800      145,800 
Preferred stock issued to pay capital lease obligations  21,420   257,014               257,014   24,943   299,297   —     —     —     —     299,297 
Stock-based compensation        10,000   20,000   744,870      764,870   —     —     10,000   60,000   200,980   —     260,980 
Net loss                 (5,064,761)  (5,064,761)  —     —     —     —     —     (5,589,663)  (5,589,663)
                                                        
Balances, September 30, 2017  1,850,676  $21,831,374   2,162,725  $17,562,267  $7,677,319  $(46,253,612) $817,348 
Balances, September 30, 2018  1,882,759  $22,216,343   3,331,018  $26,817,413  $8,032,938  $(53,357,207) $3,709,487 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


6

XG SCIENCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016 (unaudited)

 

  2017  2016 
     (Restated) 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net loss $(5,064,761) $(4,279,605)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  665,813   684,199 
Amortization of intangible assets  31,770   26,856 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets     18,609 
Stock-based compensation expense  764,870   342,189 
Non-cash interest expense  177,188   213,906 
Gain from change in fair value of derivative liability - warrants  46,612   (50,799)
Changes in current assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (279,608)  (4,044)
Inventory  12,750   2,434 
Other current and non-current assets  145,047   (101,216)
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (303,580)  480,164 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES  (3,803,899)  (2,667,307)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Purchases of property and equipment  (428,016)  (84,187)
Purchases of intangible assets  (115,470)  (89,264)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (543,486)  (173,451)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Advances (repayments) of capital lease obligations, net  (14,625)  29,896 
Repayments of short-term notes, net     (175,250)
Proceeds from long-term loan  2,000,000    
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  2,140,400   3,102,032 
Common stock issuance fees and expenses  (245,972)  (538,640)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  3,879,803   2,418,038 
         
NET DECREASE IN CASH  (467,582)  (422,720)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD  1,785,343   1,060,224 
         
CASH AT END OF PERIOD $1,317,761  $637,504 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid for interest $  $27,107 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING:        
Value of preferred stock issued for AAOF capital lease obligations $257,014  $257,014 
Property and equipment under capital leases $  $38,998 
Reclassification of derivative liability warrants to equity - ASU 2017-11 (see note 2) $7,650,442  $ 
Reclassification of derivative liability warrants to equity - Series B Amendment $296,419  $51,418 
Warrants issued with long and short-term financings $145,800  $24,060 

  

For the Nine Months Ended

September 30,

  2018 2017
     
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net loss $(5,589,663) $(5,064,761)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  710,731   665,813 
Amortization of intangible assets  39,934   31,770 
Provision for bad debts  25,000   —   
Stock-based compensation expense  260,980   764,870 
Non-cash interest expense  252,672   177,188 
Non-cash equipment rent expense  106,164   —   
Gain from change in fair value of derivative liability – warrants  —     46,612 
Changes in current assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (424,873)  (279,608)
Inventory  (83,959)  12,750 
Other current and non-current assets  (116,515)  145,266 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  392,331   (303,580)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES  (4,427,198)  (3,803,680)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Purchases of property and equipment  (2,665,268)  (428,016)
Purchases of intangible assets  (125,542)  (115,470)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  (2,790,810)  (543,486)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Repayments of capital lease obligations  (12,361)  (14,625)
Proceeds from long-term loan  —     2,000,000 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  7,741,344   2,140,400 
Common stock issuance fees and expenses  (99,943)  (245,972)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES  7,629,040   3,879,803 
         
NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH  411,032   (467,363)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  3,041,590   1,980,842 
         
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH, END OF PERIOD $3,452,622  $1,513,479 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid for interest $629  $—   
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Value of preferred stock issued for AAOF capital lease obligations $299,297  $257,014 
Reclassification of derivative liability warrants to equity – ASU 2017-11 (see note 2) $—    $7,650,442 
Reclassification of derivative liability warrants to equity – Series B Amendment $—    $296,419 
Warrants issued with long and short-term financings $—    $145,800 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


7

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

 

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

XG Sciences, Inc., a Michigan company located in Lansing, Michigan and its subsidiary, XG Sciences IP, LLC (collectively referred to as “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) manufactures graphene nanoplatelets made from graphite, using two proprietary manufacturing processes to split natural flakes of crystalline graphite into very small and thin particles, which we sell as xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets. We sell our nanoparticlesnanoplatelets in the form of bulk powders or dispersions to other companies for use as additives to make composite and other materials with specially engineered characteristics. We also manufacture and sell integrated, value-added products containing these graphene nanoplatelets such as greases, composites, thin sheets, inks and coating formulations that we sell to other companies. Additionally, we licensehave licensed our technology to other companies in exchange for royalties and other fees.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in our annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been condensed or omitted in these interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on Form 10-K on March 31, 2017.April 2, 2018.

 

The results of operations presented in this quarterly report are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for any future periods. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments and accruals, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair statement of the results of all interim periods reported herein.

 

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Liquidity

 

We have historically incurred losses from operations and we may continue to generate negative cash flows as we implement our business plan. Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using US GAAP as applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

 

We originally filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-209131) with the SEC on April 11, 2016 which was declared effective by the SEC on April 13, 2016 (as amended, the “Registration Statement”). The Registration Statement registered up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock at a fixed price of $8.00 per share to the general public in a self-underwritten offering (the “Offering” or our “IPO”). Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement was declared effective August 26, 2016, Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 was declared effective August 31, 2016, Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 was declared effective January 17, 2017, and Post-Effective Amendments No. 4 and No. 5 were dated April 12, 2017.Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 wasdeclared effective April 14, 2017. Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 was declared effective June 26, 2018. Although we are currently selling shares of our common stock in our IPO pursuant to the Registration Statement, we have not yet listed the company for trading on any exchanges.

In December 2016, we entered into a draw loan note and agreement (the “Dow Facility”) with The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) to provide up to $10 million of secured debt financing at an interest rate of 5% per year, drawable at our request under certain conditions. We received $2As of September 30, 2018, we had drawn $5 million at closing, $1 million on July 18, 2017, and $1 million on September 22, 2017. We currently have $1 million of additional funding available on or before December 1, 2017 under the Dow Facility. After December 1, 2017, an additional $5 million becomes available underAs a condition of the Dow Facility, ifDow required that we have raisedraise $10 million of equity capital after October 31, 2016. 2016 in order to access the second tranche of $5 million. As of September 30, 2018, we had raised $12,274,968 from our IPO since November 1, 2016, and thus have met this requirement. Therefore, the remaining $5 million under the Dow Facility is now available to us.

 

As of November 10, 2017,September 30, 2018, we had cash on hand of $1,226,776$3,262,554. As of November 7, 2018, we had cash on hand of $5.7 million. We believe our cash from increasing commercial sales activity and currently available funds of $1 million undervarious financing sources will fund our operations for at least the Dow Facility. Our financial projections show that we may need to raise an additional $6-8 million before we are capable of achieving sustainable free cash flow after capital expenditures.next 12 months. We intend that the primary means for raising such funds will be through our ongoing IPO the additional $1 million of currently available funds under the Dow Facility, and up to an additional $5 million of proceeds from the Dow Facility in the event that we raise $10 million of additional equity capital after October 31, 2016. Thus far, we have raised approximately $3 million through the sale of 376,078 shares of common stock between November 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017 towards the requirement to raise $10 million of additional equity capital in order to open up the remaining $5 million of availability onunder the Dow Facility. There can be no assurance that we will be ableAs of November 7, 2018, there are 651,500 more shares of common stock available to raise additional equity capital insell pursuant to the IPO orRegistration Statement. If all of such shares were sold, it would result in subsequent equity offerings or that the terms and conditionsadditional gross proceeds of any future financings will be workable or acceptable to us and our stockholders.$5,212,000.

In the event we are unable to fund our operations from existing cash on hand, operating cash flows, additional borrowings or raising equity capital, we may be forced to reduce our expenses, slow down our growth rate, or discontinue operations. Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

8 

 

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, together with amounts disclosed in the related notes to the financial statements. Actual results and outcomes may differ from our estimates, judgments and assumptions. Significant estimates, judgments and assumptions used in these condensed consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, those related to revenue, accounts receivable and related allowances, contingencies, useful lives and recovery of long-term assets, including intangible assets, income taxes, and the fair value of stock-based compensation. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of material revisions in estimates are reflected in the financial statements prospectively from the date of the change in estimate.

 

Inventory

 

Inventory consists of raw materials and finished goods, all of which are valuedstated at standardthe lower of cost which approximates average cost.or market. Cost is determined on a first in, first out basis.

 

The following amounts were included in inventory at the end of the period:      
 September 30, December 31,  September 30, December 31, 
 2017 2016  2018 2017 
Raw materials $48,450  $45,964  $99,622 $39,841 
Finished goods  144,773   160,009   156,200  132,023 
Total $193,223  $205,973  $255,822 $171,864 

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. The terms of convertible preferred stock and convertible notes that we issue are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required by ASC 815: “Derivatives and Hedging” to be accounted for separately from the host contract and recorded at fair value. In addition, freestanding warrants are also reviewed to determine if they achieve equity classification. Certain stock warrants that we have issued did not meet the conditions for equity classification at inception and were classified as derivative instrument liabilities measured at fair value. The fair values of these derivative liabilities were revalued at each reporting date, with the change in fair value recognized in earnings. See Note 5 for additional information.

 

In July 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-11,Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) (“ASU 2017-11”). This update changes the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments with down-round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instrument, securities with anti-dilution features no longer preclude equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. As a result, freestanding equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded conversion features) would no longer be accounted for as derivative liabilities at fair value as a result of the existence of an anti-dilution feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, ASU 2017-11 requires entities that present earnings per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the anti-dilution feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. The guidance in this Update is effective for fiscal years, and interim period within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with earlier adoption permitted. When adopted in an interim period, any adjustments are reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. We elected to early adopt ASU 2017-11 during the three months endedat September 30, 2017 by applying the standard retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down round feature by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the Company’s beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2016 (see note 2).2017. There were 972,720 warrants indexed to Series A Preferred Stock which were originally recorded as derivative liabilities as a resultbecause of their anti-dilution features. We chose to early adopt ASU 2017-11 because it permitted these warrants to be recorded as equity rather than derivative liabilities. If ASU 2017-11 had been effective

Fair Value Measurements

The Company utilizes a valuation hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques related to its financial assets and financial liabilities in 2016, it would have resulted in a decrease inaccordance to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

For financial instruments such as cash, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the derivative liability and a corresponding decrease inCompany considers the accumulated deficitrecorded value of $7,582,158 as of September 30, 2016. The impactsuch financial instruments approximate to the financial statements ascurrent fair value because of their short-term nature. The carrying value of the threeCompany’s long-term debt obligations approximates fair value based on current market conditions for similar obligations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU No. 2014-09 (ASC 606),Revenue from Contracts with Customersbecame effective for us January 1, 2018, and nine-months ended September 30, 2016we adopted the new accounting standard using the modified retrospective transition approach. The modified retrospective transition approach recognized any changes from the beginning of the year of initial application through retained earnings with no restatement of comparative periods. We record revenue under ASC 606 at a single point in time, when control is as follows:transferred to the customer, which is consistent with past practice. We will continue to apply our current business processes, policies, systems and controls to support recognition and disclosure under the new standard. Based on the results of the evaluation, we have determined that the adoption of the new standard presents no material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Application of the transition requirements of the new standard did not have a material impact on opening retained earnings.

 

9

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

  Three months ended September 30, 2016 
  As previously  As 
  reported  Adjusted 
Operating loss $(1,331,390) $(1,331,390)
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense, net  (56,013)  (55,816)
Gain from change in fair value of derivative warrants  108,056   26,738 
Government incentives  24,197   24,000 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets  (18,609)  (18,609)
Total other income (expense)  57,631   (23,687)
         
Net loss $(1,273,759) $(1,355,077)

  Nine months ended September 30, 2016 
  As previously  As 
  reported  Adjusted 
Operating loss $(4,143,207) $(4,143,207)
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest expense, net  (241,011)  (240,588)
Gain from change in fair value of derivative warrants  340,669   50,799 
Government incentives  72,423   72,000 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets  (18,609)  (18,609)
Total other income (expense)  153,472   (136,398)
         
Net loss $(3,989,735) $(4,279,605)

The impact to the balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:   
  As previously  As 
  reported  Adjusted 
       
       
Derivative liability-warrants $7,900,249  $249,807 
Total long-term liabilities $9,877,475  $2,227,033 
Total liabilities $11,117,327  $3,466,885 
Series A convertible preferred stock $21,634,597  $21,574,360 
Accumulated deficit $(48,899,530) $(41,188,851)

Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity

 $(5,126,864

)

 

$

2,523,578 
Total liabilities and stockholder’s deficit $5,990,463  $5,990,463 

10 

 

 

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER

ASU No. 2016-18,Restricted Cash Flowsprovides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents, which are now included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending cash amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. Using the retrospective transition method required under the standard, the Company has adjusted the presentation of its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-18 did not have any other impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following table provides additional detail by financial statement line item of the ASU 2016-18 impact on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2017:

(In thousands) As Reported
(Pre-Adoption)
 ASU 2016-18
Impact
 

Reported

(Post-Adoption)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018            
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period $2,845,798  $195,792  $3,041,590 
             
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017            
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $(467,582) $219  $(467,363)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period  1,785,343   195,499   1,980,842 
             
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $1,317,761  $195,718  $1,513,479 

ASU No. 2016-15,Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments applies to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard for the year ending December 31, 2018 did not have a significant effect on the Company’scondensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2016-02,Leases requires a lessee to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, unlike current GAAP, which requires only capital leases to be recognized on the balance sheet, this new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. This standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The Company is in the process of evaluating how significant the impact of the adoption of this standard will be on its balance sheet as it recognizes lease assets and lease liabilities related to its operating leases and whether there will be any significant impact on its results of operations and cash flows.

 

NOTE 3 WARRANTS AND FINANCING AGREEMENTS

 

Dow LoanFacility

 

In December 2016, we entered into the Dow Facility, which provides us with up to $10 million of secured debt financing at an interest rate of 5% per year, drawable at our request under certain conditions. We received $2 million at closing and an additional $1 million on each of July 18, 2017, and September 22, 2017 and December 4, 2017, respectively. We currently have $1 million of additional funding available on or before December 1, 2017 under the Dow Facility. After December 1, 2017, anAn additional $5 million becomesis currently available if we have raised $10 million of equity capital after October 31, 2016.  to us.

 

The Dow Facility is senior to most of our other debt and is secured by all of our assets (Dow is subordinate only to the capital leaseslease with AAOF, see Note 9)Aspen Advanced Opportunity Fund, LP (“AAOF”). The loan does not mature untilmatures on December 1, 2021 (subject to certain mandatory prepayments based on our equity financing activities). Interest is payable beginning January 1, 2017 although we may electhave elected to capitalize interest through January 1, 2019. Dow received warrant coverage of one share of common stock for each $40 in loans received by us, equating to 20% warrant coverage, with an exercise price of $8.00 per share for the warrants issued at closing of the initial $2 million draw. After the initial closing, the strike price of future warrants issued areis subject to adjustment if we sell shares of common stock at a lower price. As of September 30, 2017,2018, we had issued 100,000125,000 warrants to Dow, which are exercisable on or before the expiration date of December 1, 2023. 

10

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The aforementioned warrants meet the criteria for classification within stockholders’ equity. Proceeds were allocated between the debt and the warrants at their relative fair value. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized amortization expense of $161,702, and the resulting carrying value of the Dow Facility on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2017 was $4,794,596. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, we recognized amortization expense of $98,384 was recognized$228,908, and the resulting in a carrying value of $3,814,703 for the Dow LoanFacility on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2017.

The Dow Facility entitles Dow to appoint an observer to our board of directors (the “Board”). Dow will maintain their observation right until the later of December 1, 2019 or when the amount of principal and interest outstanding under the Dow Facility is less than $5 million.

NOTE 4 — PRIVATE PLACEMENT AND PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS

Private Placement

In April 2015, we commenced a private placement offering of Series B Units consisting of shares of Series B Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase common stock at an offering price of $16.00 per Series B Unit. During the period April 2015 through December 2016, we sold 266,887 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants to purchase 222,262 shares of common stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $4,270,192.

The private Series B Unit offering2018 was terminated on February 25, 2016. As a result of our IPO and pursuant to certain exchange rights granted to participants in the Series B Unit offering, holders of Series B Preferred Stock received the right to exchange each share of Series B Preferred Stock they owned into two shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, all holders of Series B Preferred Stock had exercised their Series B exchange rights, and as a result we issued 539,974 shares of restricted common stock in exchange for the 269,987 shares of Series B Preferred Stock that had been previously outstanding. All of the previously issued Series B Preferred Stock was cancelled. Although the stock was cancelled all of the 224,897 warrants issued in connection with the Series B Units remain outstanding at September 30, 2017. Such warrants have an exercise price of $16.00 per share and expire between April 21 and June 30, 2022. These warrants were classified as derivative liabilities until September 30, 2017; at which time they were reclassified to equity (additional paid in capital). The reclassification was made on September 30, 2017 after determining that the exchange rights as defined in the Michigan “Certificate of Amendment – Corporation”, filed on August 19, 2016 no longer required liability classification (see Note 2).$5,023,505.


XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

NOTE 5 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY WARRANTS

At inception, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock warrants issued in conjunction with convertible notes issued in 2013 (subsequently converted into Series A Preferred Stock), equipment financing leases procured in 2013 and 2014, and certain other pre-emptive rights and the common stock warrants issued in connection with the 2015 Series B Unit offering were derivative liabilities which require re-measurement at fair value each reporting period.

As mentioned in Note 2, during the three months ended September 30, 2017, we chose to adopt ASU 2017-11 which changed the classification analysis of certain warrants with anti-dilution features. Since we chose to early adopt ASU 2017-11 in an interim period, the adjustments were reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the Company’s beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2016. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-11, the Company no longer recognizes a liability related to 972,720 warrants, which were only classified as liabilities a result of having anti-dilution features.

As mentioned in Note 4, 224,897 warrants related to the Series B offering were reclassified from derivative liabilities on the balance sheet to equity at September 30, 2017 because the requirement to classify them as liabilities was removed when we amended the Series B Certificate of Designation in August of 2016.

The initial value of the stock warrants issued as consideration for the equipment financing leases in 2013 and 2014 was recorded as a reduction of the capital lease obligation and is being amortized as part of the effective interest cost on the capital lease obligation (see Note 8).

In 2014 when we entered into financing agreements with Samsung, AAOF and XGS II, we provided our shareholders with preemptive rights to purchase shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for every two shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or Common Stock owned by the shareholder. In addition, for every two shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock purchased by a shareholder, we issued such shareholder a warrant to purchase one additional share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with the same terms as the warrants issued to AAOF and XGS II.

Also, as part of our private placement of Series B Units in April 2015, shareholders and holders of our convertible notes were provided the right to purchase their pro rata share of any class of stock that the Company sells or issues. The sale of Series B Preferred Stock in the April 2015 offering triggered the preemptive rights resulting in the issuance of shares of Series B Preferred Stock and warrants.  As of September 30, 2017, the total number of Stock Warrants issued due to the preemptive rights offerings was 58,689.


XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

The following table summarizes the fair value of the derivative liabilities as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
       
Warrants issued with Secured Convertible Notes $  $6,554,160 
Warrants issued with equipment financing leases     655,418 
Warrants issued with preemptive rights     443,790 
Warrants issued with April 2015 private placement of Series B Units     246,881 
Adoption of accounting standard ASU 2017-11     (7,650,442)
         
Total derivative liabilities $  $249,807 

The Company estimated the fair value of their warrant derivative liabilities as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, using a lattice model and the following assumptions:

December 31, 2016
Fair value of underlying stock$7.63 - $12.64
Equivalent risk free interest rate1.27%- 1.46%
Expected term (in years)5.33- 7.04
Equivalent stock price volatility37.44%- 37.92%
Expected dividend yield

The value of the warrants is estimated using a binomial lattice model. Equivalent amounts reflect the net results of multiple modeling simulations that the lattice model applies to underlying assumptions. Because the Company is not publicly traded on a national exchange or to our knowledge, an over-the-counter market, the expected volatility of the Company’s stock was developed using historical volatility for a peer group for a period equal to the expected term of the warrants. The fair value of the warrants will be significantly influenced by the fair value of our common stock, stock price volatility, and the risk-free interest components of the lattice technique.

Changes in the fair value of Derivative Liabilities, carried at fair value, are reported as “Change in fair value of derivative liability — warrants” in the Statement of Operations. Comparative prior periods were prepared using the newly adopted ASU 2017-11 as follows:

  Three months ended September 30,
  2017 2016
Warrants issued with preemptive rights $(506) $26,423 
Warrants issued with April 2015 private placement of Series B Units  (42,648)  315 
Total Derivative Gain (Loss) $(43,154) $26,738 

  Nine months ended September 30,
  2017 2016
Warrants issued with preemptive rights $(545) $48,964 
Warrants issued with April 2015 private placement of Series B Units  (46,067)  577 
Warrants issued with Bridge Financing      1,258 
Total Derivative Gain (Loss) $(46,612) $50,799 

13 

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

Subsequent to the Company’s early adoption of ASU 2017-11, which effected 972,720 warrants related to Series A Preferred stock, and the Company’s reclassification of 224,897 warrants related to Series B Preferred stock on September 30, 2017 (from derivative liabilities to equity) we are no longer required to record the change in fair values for these instruments.

 

NOTE 64 – STOCK WARRANTS ACCOUNTED FOR AS EQUITY INSTRUMENTS

 

The following table summarizes the common stock warrants (including the warrants previously accounted for as derivatives) outstanding at September 30, 2017,2018, which are accounted for as equity instruments, all of which are exercisable: 

Date Issued Expiration Date 

Indexed

Stock

 Exercise Price  Number of 
Warrants
 
           
07/01/2009 07/01/2019 Common $8.00   6,000 
10/08/2012 10/08/2027 Common $12.00   5,000 
01/15/2014 - 12/31/2014 01/15/2024 Series A Convertible Preferred $6.40   972,720 
04/30/2015- 05/26/2015 04/30/2022 Common $16.00   218,334 
06/30/2015 06/30/2022 Common $16.00   6,563 
12/31/2015 12/31/2020 Common $8.00   20,625 
03/31/2016 03/31/2021 Common $10.00   10,600 
04/30/2016 04/30/2021 Common $10.00   895 
12/14/2016 12/01/2023 Common $8.00   50,000 
07/18/2017 12/01/2023 Common $8.00   25,000 
09/22/2017 12/01/2023 Common $8.00   25,000 
12/04/2017 12/01/2023 Common $8.00   25,000 
           1,365,737 

Each warrant indexed to Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is currently exercisable and exchangeable into 1.875 shares of common stock.

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of common stock, no par value per share of which 3,331,018 and 2,353,350 shares were issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

 

Date Issued Expiration Date Exercise Price  Number of 
Warrants
 
         
07/01/2009 07/01/2019 $8.00   6,000 
10/08/2012 10/08/2027 $12.00   5,000 
01/15/2014 - 12/31/2014 01/15/2024 $6.40   972,720 
04/30/2015- 05/26/2015 04/30/2022 $16.00   218,334 
06/30/2015 06/30/2022 $16.00   6,563 
12/14/2016 12/01/2023 $8.00   50,000 
07/18/2017 12/01/2023 $8.00   25,000 
09/22/2017 12/01/2023 $8.00   25,000 
         1,308,617 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 the Company issued 967,668 shares of common stock pursuant to the Offering. As of September 30, 2018 the Company had sold 1,934,500 shares of common stock in its IPO at a price of $8.00 per share for gross proceeds of $15,476,000.

Potentially dilutive securities consist of shares potentially issuable pursuant to stock options and warrants as well as shares that would result from full conversion of all outstanding convertible securities. These potentially dilutive securities were 2,894,742 and 2,804,372 as of September 30 2018 and 2017, respectively, and are excluded from diluted net loss per share calculations because they are anti-dilutive.

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 3,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred”). Each share of the Series A Preferred, which has a liquidation preference of $12.00 per share, is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into one share of common stock at the lower of: (a) $12.00 per share, or (b) 80% of the price at which the Company sells any equity or equity-linked securities in the future. The Series A Preferred also contains typical anti-dilution provisions that provide for adjustment of the conversion price to reflect stock splits, stock dividends, or similar events. The Series A Preferred is subject to mandatory conversion into common stock upon the listing of the Company’s common stock on a Qualified National Exchange. However, the Series A Preferred is not subject to the mandatory conversion until all outstanding convertible securities are also converted into common stock. The Series A Preferred ranks senior to all other equity or equity equivalent securities of the Company other than those securities which are explicitly senior or pari passu in rights and liquidation preference to the Series A Preferred and pari passu with the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock.

11

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company issued 1,456,126 shares of Series A Preferred in connection with the conversion of certain convertible notes on December 31, 2015.

In December 2015, the conversion price of the Series A Preferred was reduced from $12.00 to $6.40 (80% of $8.00), and thus, each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into 1.875 shares of common stock.

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had 1,882,759 and 1,857,816 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company issued 24,943 shares of Series A Preferred to AAOF as payment under the terms of their Master Leasing Agreement.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, 1,500,000 shares have been designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”), of which no shares were issued and outstanding. Each share of the Series B Preferred, which has a liquidation preference of $16.00 per share, is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into one share of common stock at $16.00 per share. The Series B Preferred also contains typical anti-dilution provisions that provide for adjustment of the conversion price to reflect stock splits, stock dividends, or similar events. Each share of Series B Preferred is subject to mandatory conversion into common stock at the then-effective Series B conversion rate upon the public listing by the Company of its common stock on a Qualified National Exchange. However, the Series B Preferred is not subject to the mandatory conversion until all outstanding convertible securities are also converted into common stock. The Series B Preferred ranks senior to all other equity or equity equivalent securities of the Company other than those securities which are explicitly senior or pari passu in rights and liquidation preference to the Series B Preferred and pari passu with the Company’s Series A Preferred.

 

NOTE 76 – EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 

We previously established the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”), which was scheduled to expire on October 30, 2017 and under which we granted key employees and directors options to purchase shares of our common stock at not less than fair market value as of the grant date. On May 4, 2017, the Board approved the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) to replace the 2007 Stock Option Plan, which became effective upon the approval of the stockholders holding a majority of the voting power in the Company on July 18, 2017. The 2017 Plan replacesreplaced the 2007 Plan and authorizes usthe Company to issuegrant awards (stock options and restricted stock) with respect ofup to a maximum of 1,200,000 shares of our common stock, which equals the number of shares authorized under the 2007 Plan, as amended.stock.   

 

On July 24, 2017, certain stock options from the prior incentive stock option plan2007 Plan were cancelled and replacement stock options were awarded. The replacement stock option awards have an exercise price of $8.00 per share and a seven-year term, areterm. Fifty percent of such awards vested 50% on the date of grant with the remaining vesting over a 4 year4-year period, from the date issued, and are subject to certain other terms. Each option holder received options equal to 150% of the number of cancelled stock options.

On August 10, 2017 and September 30, 2018, the Company granted stock options and restricted stock to each of its Board members as part of its Board compensation package. On each issuance date, the four independent Board members received 2,500 stock options with a grant price of $8.00 per share and 2,500 shares of restricted stock for Board services. The cancellationstock options had an aggregate grant date fair value of $26,120 and reissuance$29,580 on August 10, 2017 and September 30, 2018, respectively. The options vest ratably over a four-year period beginning on the one-year anniversary. The restricted stock issued to the Board members has an aggregate fair value of $160,000 and vest ratably in arrears over four quarters on the last day of each fiscal quarter following the grant date. As of September 30, 2018, 12,500 shares of restricted stock had vested, resulting in total compensation expense of $100,000.

A summary of the stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 is as follows: 

   
    Weighted
  Number Average
  Of Exercise
  Options Price
     
Options outstanding at December 31, 2017  677,125  $8.00 
Changes during the period:        
Expired  (27,500)  8.00 
New Options Granted – at market price  28,250   8.00 
         
Options outstanding at September 30, 2018  677,875  $8.00 
         
Options exercisable at September 30, 2018  388,400  $8.00 

12

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

All options were treated as a modificationgranted thus far under ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. Incremental compensation costthe 2017 Plan have an exercise price of approximately$1,015,758  was measured as the excess$8.00 per share and vesting of the options ranges from immediate to 25% per year, with most options vesting 25% per year beginning on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. The options expire in seven years from the date of grant.

During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted 2,000 employee stock options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $5,916. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted 18,250 employee stock options with an aggregate grant date fair value of $52,907. The fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the terms were modified. Compensation cost of approximately $501,071options granted was recordedestimated on the date of cancellation for awards that were vested on the date of the modification. For unvested awards, compensation cost of approximately $514,687 will be recorded over the remaining requisite service period. The fair values of the replacement options granted were estimated on the dates of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions: Stock price: $8.00, Exercise Price: $8.00, Expected Term: 3.51-4.78,4.75 years, Volatility: 34.78% - 36.87%37.34%-38.09%, Risk free rate: 1.53% - 1.83%2.65%-2.94%, Dividend rate: 0%.

On August 10, 2017, the Company granted As of September 30, 2018, 677,875 stock options and restricted stock to each of its board members as part of their compensation package. Each of the 4 board members received 2,500 stock options and 2,50020,000 shares of restricted stock awards were outstanding under our 2017 Plan.

Stock-based compensation expense was $86,750 and $260,980 for their board services. The options were granted at a price of $8.00 per sharethe three and had an aggregate grant date fair value of $26,120. The options vest ratably over a four-year period beginning on the one-year anniversary. The restricted stock issued to the board members have an aggregate fair value of $80,000 and vest ratably in arrears on the last day of each fiscal quarter following the grant date. As ofnine months ended September 30, 2017, 2,500 shares of restricted stock had vested resulting in compensation expense of $20,000.


XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

A summary of2018, respectively, compared to $588,128 and $764,870 for the stock option activity for thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2017, is as follows: 

   
     Weighted  
  Number  Average 
  Of  Exercise 
  Options  Price 
       
Options outstanding at beginning of year  369,750  $11.89 
Changes during the year:        
Expired  (12,000)  12.00 
Cancellation of existing options  (357,750)  12.00 
Issuance of replacement options  536,625   8.00 
New Options Granted – at market price  108,000   8.00 
Exercised      
         
Options outstanding at end of Period  644,625   8.00 
         
Options exercisable at end of Period  322,158   8.00 

The fair valuesrespectively. As of options granted are estimated on the dates of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model. Vesting ofSeptember 30, 2018, there was approximately $797,000 in unrecognized compensation cost related to the options granted range from immediatelyunder the 2017 plan. We expect to 25% per year, with most of the replacement options vesting 50% on date of grant withrecognize these costs over the remaining vesting over aterms, ranging from 3 to 4 year period from the date issued. The options expire in seven years from date of grant. years.

 

NOTE 87 – CAPITAL LEASES

 

As of September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, we have capital lease obligations as follows:

 

  September 30,
2017
  December 31,
 2016
 
       
Capital lease obligations $214,191  $449,368 
Unamortized warrant discount  (23,252)  (65,595)
Net obligations  190,939   383,773 
Short-term portion of obligations  (159,628)  (268,667)
Long-term portion of obligations $31,311  $115,106 

Our AAOF capital lease obligations are four-year leases starting on January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015. Our other capital leases expire at various dates in 2018, have average effective interest rates of 0% and contain bargain purchase options that allow us to purchase the leased property for a minimal amount upon the expiration of the lease term.

  September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
     
Capital lease obligations $48,194  $149,120 
Unamortized warrant discount  (480)  (15,040)
Net obligations  47,714   134,080 
Short-term portion of obligations  (34,881)  (118,553)
Long-term portion of obligations $12,833  $15,527 

 

NOTE 9 —8 –Customer, Supplier, country, and Product Concentrations

 

Grants and Licensing Revenue Concentration

 

ForThere was no grant revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. There was $25,466 of grant revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 from one grantor accounted for 100% of the total grant revenue. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,and $124,955 from two grantors accounted for 25% and 75% of total grant revenue. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, two grantors accounted for 50% each of the total grant revenue, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, two grantors accounted2017; of this total 75% was from one grantor and 25% from another. There was no licensing revenue for 12%the three and 88% of the total grant revenue in each period.nine months ended September 30, 2018. There was no licensing revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Licensing2017, and one licensor accounted for the licensing revenue reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and for the three and nine months ended 2016, came from one licensor.of $50,000.

 

Product Concentration

 

Concentrations of product sales revenue greater than 10% of total product sales revenue are shown in the table below. We attempt to minimize the risk associated with product concentrations by continuing to develop new products to add to our portfolio of products offered.portfolio.

 

  For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
  For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Grade C-300 HP  *   *   14%  * 
Grade C-500  66%  *   41%  * 
Grade R-10  *   16%  *   12%
Grade M-15  *   16%  *   14%

 

 For the Three Months Ended September 30, For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2018 2017 2018 2017
Graphene nanoplatelets –powders/cakes/slurries98% 96% 93% 91%
Integrated products* * * *
Developmental products* * * *

In the table above * Denotes lessdenotes no concentration greater than 10% of product sales.total sales revenue.


13

XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

Customer Concentration

During the three months ended September 30, 2018, we had one customer whose purchases accounted for 91% of product sales.  During the three months ended September 30, 2017, we had two customers whose purchases accounted for 19%65% and 65% of product sales. During the three months ended September 30, 2016 we had three customers who accounted for 10%, 12% and 21%17% of product sales.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we had one customer whose purchases accounted for 87% of product sales. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we had two customers whose purchases accounted for 17%,36% and 36% of product sales. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 we had two customers whose purchases accounted for 11% each17% of product sales.

 

At September 30, 2017,2018, there were two customers who each had an accounts receivable balance greater than 10% of our total outstanding receivable balance. At September 30, 2016,2017, there were two customers who each had an accounts receivable balance greater than 10% of our total outstanding receivable balance.

 

Country Concentration

 

We sell our products on a worldwide basis. All of these sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.

 

International sales for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 were 33%5% of product sales as compared with 54%33% for the three months ended September 30, 2016. One2017. No foreign countries accounted for greater than 10% of total product sales for the three months ended September 30, 2018, and one country, China, accounted for 19% of product sales for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and three countries, China, the United Kingdom and South Korea, accounted for 10%, 14%, and 20%, respectively, of product sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016.2017.

 

International sales for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 were 34%5% of product sales as compared with 66%46% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. One country, China,2017. No foreign countries accounted for approximately 17%greater than 10% of total product sales for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, and two countries, the United KingdomChina and South Korea, accounted for 10%17% and 30%10%, respectively, of product sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.2017.

 

Suppliers

 

We buy raw materials used in manufacturing from several sources. These materials are available from a large number of sources. Thus, we believe a change in suppliers would have no material effect on our operations. We did not have any purchases from one supplier that were more than 10% of total purchases for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017.

 

NOTE 10 -9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

We have a licensing agreement for exclusive use of patents and pending patents with Michigan State University (“MSU”), a shareholder of the Company via the MSU Foundation. During the three months ended September 30, 20172018 and 20162017 we recorded licensing expense of $12,500 per quarter. During the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 20162017 we recorded licensing expense of $37,500 in each period.

 

We have also entered into product licensing agreements with POSCO, a shareholder. See below for POSCO. Other than MSU and POSCO, there were nocertain other shareholders. No royalty revenue or expenses or revenuehave been recognized related to these agreements during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 or the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and 2016.we recorded $50,000 of royalty revenue from POSCO, a shareholder.

 

The Company and POSCO, a shareholder of the Company, entered into a license agreement dated June 8, 2011, pursuant to which POSCO agreed to pay a minimum annual royalty of $100,000 per year if certain circumstances existed, among other things. The Company believed that this minimum annual royalty became due annually beginning on February 28, 2015, and up until June 30, 2017, recorded this royalty revenue at a rate of $25,000 per quarter. POSCO disputed its obligation to pay this minimum annual royalty, and did not pay the royalty in any prior year. We filed a demand for arbitration in the International Court of Arbitration on March 9, 2016, in an effort to resolve the dispute. Pursuant to a confidential settlement, on November 3, 2017, the Company and POSCO agreed to settle the dispute and to dismiss the arbitration. Based on terms of the settlement, no allowance is considered necessary. At September 30, 2017 we have a balance of $175,000 reflected in other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. This represents an accrual of licensing revenue of $100,000 for three and a half years less 50% to reflect an estimate of the portion of 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014 licensing fees we believed to be not collectible. At December 31, 2016 the accrued licensing fees and allowance netted together was $150,000.


XG SCIENCES, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

On March 18, 2013, we entered into a series of agreements with two private investment funds: Aspen Advanced Opportunity Fund, LP (“AAOF”) and XGS II, LLC (“XGS II”), and pursuant to a Shareholders’ Agreement dated March 18, 2013 (as amended on February 26, 2016), a principal of each private fund serves as a member of our Board of Directors. These financing agreements were amended and restated on July 12, 2013 to provide for expanded financing commitments from AAOF and XGS II. Pursuant to these agreements, AAOF and XGS II agreed to provide $10 million of financing to the Company in the form of Secured Convertible Notes and AAOF agreed to provide an additional $1.0 million of lease financing arrangements. All of the principal and accrued interest on the Secured Convertible Notes issued to AAOF and XGS II were converted into Series A Preferred Stock in December 2016.

During the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016respectively, we issued 10,663 and 7,140 shares per period of Series A Preferred Stockstock to AAOF as payment for lease financing obligations under the terms of the Master Lease Agreement, dated March 18, 2013. Of the 10,663 shares issued during the three months ended September 30, 2018, 7,947 shares were for the purchase of equipment when the term for two of the lease schedules expired. The purchase amount for the equipment was $95,364. For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 20162017 we issued a total of 24,943 and 21,420 shares, per periodrespectively, as payment for lease obligations.

On April 19, 2018 and June 27, 2018, Arnold Allemang, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, purchased 62,500 and 125,000 shares, respectively, in our IPO through his trust, for a total of $1,500,000 in proceeds to the Company.

On June 27, 2018 and during the period August 21 - August 29, 2018, Steve Jones, a Board Member, and various affiliates of Mr. Jones purchased 56,000 and 77,243 shares, respectively, in our IPO for a total of $1,065,944 in proceeds to the Company.

 

On August 10, 2017 restricted common stock13, 2018, Philip Rose, an Officer and Board Member, purchased 6,250 shares in the amountour IPO, for a total of 2,500 shares, vesting at 25% or 625 shares on September 30, 2017, December 31, 2017, March 31, 2017, and June 30, 2017 was granted to each of four Board members: Steven C. Jones, Arnold Allemang, Dave Pendell, and Peifeng (Molly) Zhang. These awards were pursuant$50,000 in proceeds to the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition to the restricted stock, these Board members also received 2,500 stock options granted on August 10, 2017. These options vest equally over four years starting on the 1st anniversary of the date of grant. Both the restricted stock and the stock options have an exercise price of $8.00 per share. The options expire on the seventh anniversary of the date of grant.Company.

 

NOTE 1110 OTHER SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

During the period from October 1 through November 13, 2017,7, 2018, we received common stock proceeds of $405,000$3,312,000 for the sale of 50,625 shares.414,000 shares of common stock in our IPO.


14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise indicated, the words “we”, “us”, “our”, “XG”, “XGS”, “XG Sciences” or the “Company” refer to XG Sciences, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, XG Sciences IP, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company.

 

Introduction

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto included herein. The information contained below includes statements of the Company’s or management’s beliefs, expectations, hopes, goals and plans that, if not historical, are forward-looking statements subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. For a discussion on forward-looking statements, see the information set forth in the introductory note to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements”, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Overview of our Business

 

XG Sciences was formed in May 2006 for the purpose of commercializing certain technology to produce graphene nanoplatelets and integrated, value-added products containing graphene nanoplatelets. First isolated and characterized in 2004, graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms configured in an atomic-scale honeycomb lattice. Among many noted properties, monolayer graphene is harder than diamonds, lighter than steel but significantly stronger, and conducts electricity better than copper. Graphene nanoplatelets are particles consisting of multiple layers of graphene. Graphene nanoplatelets have unique capabilities for energy storage, thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, barrier properties, lubricity and the ability to impart physical property improvements when incorporated into plastics, metals or other matrices.

 

We believe the unique properties of graphene and graphene nanoplatelets will enable numerous new product applications and the market for such products will quickly grow to be a significant market opportunity. Our business model is to design, manufacture and sell advanced materials we call xGnP®graphene nanoplatelets and value-added products incorporating xGnP® nanoplatelets. We currently have hundreds of customers trialing our products for numerous applications, including, but not limited to lithium ion batteries, lead acid batteries, thermally conductive adhesives, composites, thermal transfer fluids, thermal management and heat transfer,automotive, packaging, sporting goods, industrial, inks and coatings, printed electronics, construction materials, cement, and military uses. We believe our proprietary processes have enabled us to be a low-cost producer of high quality, graphene nanoplatelets and value-added integrated products containing graphene nanoplatelets and that we are well positioned to address a wide range of end-use applications.

 

Our Customers

 

We sell products to customers around the world and have sold materials to over 1,000 customers in 47 countries since 2008. Some of these customers are research organizations and some are commercial organizations. Our customers have included well-known automotive and OEM suppliers around the world (Ford, Johnson Controls, Magna, Honda Engineering) world-scale, global-scale lithium ion battery manufacturers in the US,U.S., South Korea and China (Samsung SDI, LG Chemical, Lishen, A123) and diverse specialty material companies (3M, BASF, Henkel, Dow Chemical, DuPont), as well as leading research centers such as Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Oakridge National Laboratory. We have also licensed some of our base manufacturing technology to other companies, and we consider technology licensing a component of our business model. Our licensees include POSCO, the fourth largest steel manufacturer in the world by volume of output, and Cabot Corporation (“Cabot”), a leading global specialty chemicals and performance materials company. These licensees further extend our technology through their customer networks. Ultimately, we believe we will benefit in terms of royalties on sales of xGnP® nanoplatelets produced and sold by our licensees. TheAs can be seen in the below bar charts showchart, the cumulative number of customers has steadily grown over the last ten years.

15

Cumulative Customers, By Year

We believe average order size is an early indicator of commercial traction. The majority of our customers are still ordering in smaller quantities consistent with their development and totalengineering qualification work. As can be seen in the chart below, our quarterly average order size was relatively modest until the second half of 2017, when a number of customers reached commercial status with different product applications. The data below represents orders fulfilledshipped in the respective quarter and exclude no charge orders targeted mainly for R&D purposes. The data shows that the average order size has increased steadily over the last two years, and we believe that it will continue to increase as more customers commercialize products using our materials. In the three months ending September 30, 2018 the average order size was $15,018, an increase from $7,445 in the three months ending September 30, 2017 and an increase from $11,345 for the three months ending June 30, 2018, which resulted from changes in customer and product mix in sequential quarters. In 2017 our customer shipments increased by yearover 600% to almost 18 metric tons (MT) of products from the 2.5 MT shipped in 2016. In the 3 months ending September 30, 2018 we shipped 15.7 MT of product, primarily in the form of dry powder, an increase of 178% over the 3 months ending September 30, 2017 (5.6 MT mostly in the form of dry powder) and a sequential increase of 2% for all products shipped and an increase of 32% based on actual purchasesdry powder shipments as compared to the 3 months ending June 30, 2018. There were no integrated product shipments in the 3 months ending September 30, 2018 as compared to the 3.5 MT shipped in the previous quarter.

16

Average Order Size of our materials and orders for free samples or materials used in joint development programs.


 Fulfilled Orders

Our Products

 

Bulk MaterialsMaterials.. We target our xGnP® nanoplatelets for use in a wide range of large and growing end-use markets. Our proprietary manufacturing processes allow us to produce nanoplatelets with varying performance characteristics that can be tuned to specific end-use applications based on customer requirements. We currently offer four commercial “grades” of bulk graphene nanoplatelet materials, each of which is available in various particle sizes and thickness, which allows for surface areas ranging from approximately 50 to approximately 800 square meters per gram of material depending on the product. Other grades may be made available, depending on the needs for specific applications.applications and end-customer performance requirements. In addition, we sell our xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets in the form of pre-dispersed mixtures with water, alcohol, or other organic solvents and resins. In addition to selling bulk graphene nanoplatelets, we also offer the following integrated, value-added products that contain our graphene nanoplatelets in various forms.forms:

Composites.These consist of compositions of specially designed xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets formulated in pre-dispersed mixtures that can be easily dispersed in various polymers. Our integrated composites portfolio includes pre-compounded resins derived from a range of thermoplastics as well as master batches of resins and xGnP® nanoplatelets and their combination with resins and fibers for use in various end-use applications that may include industrial, automotive and sporting goods and which have demonstrated efficacy in standard injection molding, compression molding, blow molding and 3-D processes, to name but a few. Our current product portfolio of polymer resins containing various forms of our xGnP®graphenene nanoplatelets and in varying concentration includes: polyurethane (XGPU), polypropylene (XGPP), polyethylene terephthalate (XGPET), vinyl ester (XGVE), polyetherimide (XGPEI) and high density polyethylene (XGHDPE). Others polymers may be added over time depending on the end-market and customer needs. In addition, we offer various bulk materials with demonstrated efficacy in plastic composites to impart improved physical performance to such matrices, which may be supplied as dry powders or as aqueous or solvent-based dispersions or cakes. We have also targeted use of our graphene nanoplatelets as an additive in cement mixtures, which we believe results in improved barrier resistance, durability, toughness and corrosion protection. Our GNP®Concrete Additive promotes the formation of more uniform and smaller grain structure in cement. This fine-grain and uniform structure gives the concrete improvements in flexural and compressive strength. In addition, the embedded graphene nanoplatelets will stop cracks from forming and retard crack propagation, should any cracks form – the combination of which will improve lifetime and durability of cement.

 

Energy Storage Materials. These consist of specialty advanced materials that have been formulated for specific applications in the energy storage segment. Chief among these is our proprietary, specially formulated silicon-graphene composite material (also referred to as “SiG” or “XG SiG®”) for use in lithium-ion battery anodes. XG SiG® targets the never-ending need for higher battery capacity and longer life. In several customer trials, our SiG material has demonstrated the potential to increase battery energy storage capacity by 3-5x what is currently available with conventional lithium ion batteries today. Additionally, we offer various bulk materials for use as conductive additives for cathodes and anodes in lithium-ion batteries, as an additive to anode slurries for lead-carbon batteries, as a component in coatings for current collectors in lithium-ion batteries and we are investigating the use of our materials as part of other battery components.

 

17

Composites.

Inks and Coatings. These consist of an aqueous-based compositionspecially-formulated dispersions of speciallyxGnP®together with solvents, binders, and other additives to make electrically or thermally conductive products designed xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets formulatedfor printing or coating and which are showing promise in diverse customer applications such as automotive primers, advanced packaging, electrostatic dissipation and thermal management. We also offer a set of standardized ink formulations suitable for printing. These inks offer the capability to be easily dispersed in concreteprint electrical circuits or antennas and targeted specifically for consumer and industrial applications. Use of our GNP® Concrete Additive in cement mixtures results in improved barrier resistance, durability, toughness and corrosion protection. The graphene nanoplatelets promote the formation of more uniform and smaller grain structure in the cement. This fine-grain and uniform structure gives concrete improvements in flexural and compressive strength. In addition, the embedded graphene nanoplatelets will stop cracks from forming and retard crack propagation, should any cracks form – the combination of which will improve lifetime and durability. We intend to further extend our integrated composites portfolio to include pre-compounded resins derived from a range of thermoplastics as well as mother batches of resins and xGnP® nanoplatelets and their combination with resins and fibers for use various end-use applications. In addition, we offer various bulk materials with demonstrated efficacy in plastic composites to impart improved physical performance to such matrices, which may be supplied as dry powderssuitable for other electrical or as aqueous or solvent-based dispersions or cakes.thermal applications. All of these formulations can be customized for specific customer requirements.

 

Thermal Management Materials. These consist mainly of two types of products, our XG Leaf® sheet products and various thermal interface materials (“TIM”) in the form of custom greases or pastes. XG Leaf® is a family of sheet products ideally suited for use in thermal management in portable electronics, which may include cell phones, tablets and notebook PC’s. As these devices continue to adopt faster electronics, higher data management capabilities, brighter displays with ever increasing definition, they generate more and more heat. Managing that heat is a key requirement for the portable electronics market and our XG Leaf® product line is well suited to address the need. These sheets are made using special formulations of xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets as precursors, along with other materials for specific applications. There are several different types of XG Leaf® available in various thicknesses, depending on the end-use requirements for thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, or resistive heating. Our custom XG TIM® greases and pastes are also designed to be used in various high temperature environments. Additionally, we offer various bulk materials for use as active components in adhesives, liquids, coatings and plastic composites to impart improved thermal management performance to such matrices.

 19

 

Inks and Coatings. These consist of specially-formulated dispersions of xGnP®together with solvents, binders, and other additives to make electrically or thermally conductive products designed for printing or coating and which are showing promise in diverse customer applications such as advanced packaging, electrostatic dissipation and thermal management. We also offer a set of standardized ink formulations suitable for printing. These inks offer the capability to print electrical circuits or antennas, or might be suitable for other electrical or thermal applications. All of these formulations can be customized for specific customer requirements.

Our Focus Areas

 

We believe we are a “platform play” in advanced materials, because our proprietary processes allow us to produce varying grades of graphene nanoplatelets that can be mapped to a variety of applications in many market segments. However, we are prioritizing our efforts in specific areas and with specific customers that we believe represent opportunities for either relatively near-term revenue or especially large and attractive markets. At this time, we are focused on three high priority areas: Composites, Energy Storage, and more broadly, Thermal Management and Composites.Management. The following table shows examples of the types of applications we are pursuing, the expecting timing of revenue and the addressable market size of selected market opportunities.

 

18

XGS Market/ApplicationFocus Areas & 2018 Market Size

 

 

 

(1)Avicenne Energy, “The"The Worldwide Rechargeable Battery Market 2014 – 2025”- 2025", 24th24th Edition - V3, July 2015.

(2)Avicenne Energy, “The Worldwide RechargeableThe Battery Market 2014 – 2025”, 24th Edition — V3, July 2015Show; Novi, MI; September, 2017.
(3)   Avicenne Energy, The Battery Show; Novi, MI; September, 2017. & Internal Estimates.

(3)(4)   ArcActive via Nanalyze, April 3, 2015.

(4)(5)   ArcActive via Nanalyze, April 3, 2015 & Internal Estimates.

(5)

(6)   Future Markets Insights, “Consumer"Consumer Electronics Market: Global Industry Analysis and opportunity Assessment 2015 – 2020”

2020", May 8, 2015.

(6)(7)   Prismark, “Market"Market Assessment:  Thin Carbon-Based Heat Spreaders”Spreaders", August 2014.

(7)(8)   Reporterlink.com, “Semiconductor"Semiconductor & IC Packaging Materials Market…", May 2014.

(8)(9)   Prismark, 2015.

(9)(10) Grand View Research, “Global"Global Plastics Market Analysis…", August 2014.

(10)

(11) From (9)(10) and internal estimates: 2018 = 305 million tons of plastic, if 10% of the market adopted xGnP to enhance their

properties, and at only 1% by weight as an additive, then in 2018 305,000 tons or 305,000,000 kilos of xGnP would be

required. At $30 a Kg - the value is $9.1 Billion (“Bn”)Bn per year.

 20

Commercialization Process

 

Because graphene is a new material, most of our customers are still developing applications that use our products. Commercialization is a process, the exact timing of which is often difficult to predict. It starts with our own internal R&D to validate performance for an identified market or customer-specific need. Our customers then validate the performance of our materials and determine whether our products can be incorporated into their manufacturing processes. This is initially done at pilot projectproduction scale levels. Our customers then have to introduce products that incorporate our materials to their own customers to validate performance. After their customers have validated performance, our customers will then move to commercial scale production. Every customer goes through the same process, but will do so at varying speeds, depending on the customer, the product application and the end-use market. Thus, we are not always able to predict when our customers will begin ordering commercial volumes of our materials or predict their expected volumes over time. However, as customers move through the process, we generally receive feedback and gain greater insights regarding their commercialization plans. The following are examples of where our products are providing value to our customers at levels that are either in commercial production or we believe will warrant their use on a commercial basis (see also Exhibit 99.1basis.

Callaway Golf Company (Callaway) incorporated our graphene nanoplatelets into the outer core of their Chrome Soft golf balls, resulting in a new class of golf ball that enables higher driving speeds, greater distance and increased control, which is allowing Callaway to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5command a premium price for their golf balls in the marketplace, and

Ford Motor Company for polyurethane based foams for use in “over ten under hood components on the Ford F-150 and Mustang” going into production this quarter and “eventually, other Ford vehicles” demonstrating a 17 percent reduction in noise, a 20 percent improvement in mechanical properties and a 30 percent improvement in heat endurance properties, compared with that of the foam used without graphene, and

19

Light emitting diode module and product company demonstrated approximately 50% improvement in thermal management capability when compared to existing commercial thermal management products, translating into a 15% improvement in thermal management at the Existing Registration Statement for our Summary Customer Pipeline validating the valuedevice level, and

Lead acid battery manufacturer demonstrating approximately 90% improvement in measured cycle life, appreciable improvement in capacity and charge acceptance and without any loss in water retention performance, and

U.S. bottling company adopting commercial use of our productsgraphene nanoplatelets in various end-use marketsPET water bottles to improve modulus (10% with minimal affect to color and applications):up to 200% with color change), shelf life and energy savings during processing.  

Construction company demonstrating less than one weight percent of our product in construction material composites improves flexural strength by more than 30%, and

Plastics composite part manufacturer demonstrating 7-30% improvement in strength and 40% improvement in modulus when used in sheet molding compound, and

 

 Lead acid battery manufacturer demonstrating approximately 90% improvement in measured cycle life, appreciable improvement in capacity and charge acceptance and without any loss in water retention performance, and

Light emitting diode module and product company demonstrated approximately 50% improvement in thermal management capability when compared to existing commercial thermal management products, translating into a 15% improvement in thermal management at the device level, and

Automotive parts supplier demonstrating improvements in thermal stability for polymer composites incorporating our materials, allowing for approximately 20% higher operating temperatures and a 50% improvement in strength at the elevated temperature, and

Industrial refrigeration equipment supplier demonstrating improved heat transfer efficiency and energy savings when our xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets are incorporated as a component in the thermal-transfer fluids, and

Construction company demonstrating less than one weight percent of our product in construction material composites improves flexural strength by more than 30%, and

Plastics composite part manufacturer demonstrating 7-30% improvement in strength and 40% improvement in modulus when used in sheet molding compound, and

Engineering design firm for automotive manufacturers found approximately 20% reduction in operating temperature and in thermal uniformity when XG Leaf®replaces standard cooling fins in lithium ion battery packs, and

 

Plastic composite parts manufacturer demonstrating 25% increase in tensile strength and 15% improvement in flex modulus for a high-density polyethylene composite.
Plastic composite parts manufacturer demonstrating 25% increase in tensile strength and 15% improvement in flex modulus for a high-density polyethylene composite.

 

The process of “designing-in” new materials is relatively complex and involves the use of relatively small amounts of the new material in laboratory and engineering development for an extended period of time. Following successful development, customers that incorporate our materials into their products will then order much larger quantities of material to support commercial production. Although, our customers are under no obligation to report to us on the usage of our materials, some have indicated that they have introduced or will soon introduce commercial products that use our materials. Thus, while many of our customers are currently purchasing our materials in kilogram (one or two pound) quantities, some are now ordering at multiple ton quantities and we believe many will require tens of tons or even hundreds of tons of material whenas they commercialize products that incorporate our materials. We also believe that those customers already in production will increase their order volume as demand increases and others will begin to move into commercial volume production as they gain more experience in working with our materials and engage new customers. For example, we shipped a 1 metric ton order in the fourth quarter of 2016 to a customer who is currently moving into larger scale production and had previously used smaller quantities. In the first quarterhalf of 2017 we shipped 1.63.4 metric tons of dry powderproduct for various end-use customers and another 1.8 metric tons in the second quarter. In the third quarterhalf of 2017 we shipped over 5.7 tons and based on known customer demandjust shy of 14 metric tons. In the first three quarters of 2018, we forecast shipping more than 15shipped 45.9 metric tons of products comprising 38.0 metric tons of dry powders and approximately 7.9 metric tons of additional product in the fourthform of slurry, cake or other integrated products. In the quarter ending September 30, 2018, we shipped 15.7 metric tons of 2017.products comprised mainly of dry powders. This demand profile is further evidence that we are transitioning into higher-volume production,commercial production. Based on customer forecasts and management estimates, we expect further, sizable increases in demandto ship from 50 to 100 metric tons of product in 2018.

We also believe average order size is an indicator of commercial traction. The majority of our customers are still ordering in smaller quantities consistent with their development and engineering qualification work. The average order sizes, by quarter from the first quarter of 2015 through third quarter of 2017 are given below. These data represent orders shipped in the respective quarter and exclude no charge orders targeted mainly for R&D purposes. The data show that the average order size has increased steadily over the last two years, and we believe that it will continue to increase in the fourth quarter of 2017 and in 2018 as more customers commercialize products using our materials.


 

 

2017 and

2018 Expected Revenue

 

We are tracking the commercial and development status of more than 10075 different customer applications using our materials with some customers pursuing multiple applications. As of September 30, 2017,2018, we had fifteennineteen specific customer applications where our materials are incorporated into our customers’ products and such customers are actively promoting or selling these products to their own customers. In addition, we have another thirteenseventeen customer applications where our customers have indicated that they expect to begin shipping product incorporating our materials in the next 3 – 6 months and we have another twelveseventeen customer applications where our customers have indicated an intent to commercialize in the next 6 – 9 months. We are also haveworking with numerous additional customers with whom we are working that have not yet indicated an exact date for commercialization, but we believe have the potential to contribute to revenue in 2018. The following graphic demonstrates the trend over the past 610 quarters as an increasing number of customers indicate their intent to commercialize applications and move into actively selling or promoting products for future sales. We anticipate that the average order size for these customers will increase in the fourth quarter of 2017 and throughout 2018 as their demand grows. As a result, we believe we will begin shipping significantly greater quantities of our products, and thus begincontinue scaling revenue in the last quarter of 2017 and inthrough 2018. Based on the status of current discussions with customers and their feedback on the performance of our materials in their products, we believe we will be able to recognize approximately $15 – $30$3.5 - $4.0 million of revenue in 2018, although this cannot be assured.


 

 

 (a)Customer applications where our materials are used in customer products and they are actively promoting or selling them to their customers.

(b)Customer applications where our customers are indicating that they expect to begin shipping products incorporating our materials in the next 3-6 months.

(c)Customer applications where our customers are indicating an intent to commercialize in the next 6-9 months.
20 

 

(a)  Customer applications where our materials are used in customer products and they are actively selling them to their customers.

(b)  Customer applications where our customers are indicating that they expect to begin shipping products incorporating our materials in the next 3-6 months.

(c)  Customer applications where our customers are indicating an intent to commercialize in the next 6-9 months.

Additional 10’s of customers demonstrating efficacy and moving through qualification process.

Manufacturing Capacity

We have completed the first phase of expansion in our newest 64,000 square-foot facility. The expansion has added 90 metric tons of graphene nanoplatelet production capacity, bringing the total capacity of the facility up to approximately 180 metric tons and enabling the formulation of up to 18 million kilograms of advanced materials per year (at 1 weight percent loading). Phase two of the expansion is expected to be complete by year-end and will result in up to 400 metric tons of total graphene nanoplatelet output capacity at the facility. Our total graphene nanoplatelet output capacity across both of our manufacturing facilities, as of September 30, 2018, exceeds 200 metric tons per year and will more than double over the next three months, reaching up to an approximate 450 metric tons by year-end. The expansions support our mission to continue commercializing the use of graphene in customer products across diverse industries. XG’s increasing capacity will support the growing demand for our products over the next several quarters.

Addressable Markets

 

The markets that we serve are large and rapidly growing. For example, as shownaccording to the American Chemistry Council, total global polymer production reached 345 million metric ton in the2017 and with a compound annual growth rate of 4-5% (see figure below, Avicenne Energy (“below). The Rechargeable Battery Market, 2014 – 2025”, July 2015) estimates that theadvanced composite application market forwhich includes bulk materials, used in lithium ion battery anodes is currently approximately $1 billion, but is expected to approximately double over the next ten years. We believe our ability to address next generation anodeengineered materials, represents a significant opportunity for us.


According to Prismark Partners, LLC, a leading electronics industry consulting firm specializing inand advanced materials generated approximately $85B in global sales in 2016 (Composites Manufacturing, 2016). $30B of the 2014composites applications market for finished graphitic heat spreadersis in bulk materials and $6B of those composite materials are polymeric in nature. XG Sciences targets applications where our products are added to polymers costing more than two dollars per kilogram and also applications requiring varying material performance such as soldimproved tensile strength and flame retardancy. Targeting applications at more than the $2/Kg price point will keep the potential cost increase of adding xGnP® to the OEMbase material below 30%, an acceptable range while adding significant performance improvements unmatched by any single additive.

21

2017 Global Polymer Production: 345 million metric tons (Source: American Chemistry Council)

The 3D printing market has seen a compounded annual growth rate for the past 28 years of 25.9% (Wohler’s Associates 2017). The overall industry grew by 17.4% to $6B in 2016. The materials sold for 3D printing use grew by 17.5% to ~$1B of the industry total in 2016. These materials primarily include epoxy-based resins, powders and EMS companies with adhesive, PET, and/or copper backingfilaments. All of these matrices are well suited for selected portablexGnP® as an additive solution.

2017 3D Printing Materials Market: $1 Billion (Source: Wohler’s Associates)

The addition of xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets to various polymer matrices such as polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) has been shown to increase the mechanical properties by up to 40%. In addition, we have demonstrated 2-3X improvement in functional behaviors in other thermoset and elastomer materials. We target applications was $600 million,using neat resin systems incorporating glass and is expectedcarbon fiber fillers systems where addition of our materials will realize various property improvements. For example, in applications where customers may have previously been required to reach $900 million in 2018. The market is currently in a significant expansion period driven byuse multiple fillers to generate improved mechanical performance, processability, and flame resistance, we believe they may now have the demand for portable devices. In a press release dated June 30, 2016, Gartner, Inc., a leading research organization, estimated the 2016 global smartphone market at 1.9 billion units and worldwide combined shipmentsoption of devices (PC’s, tablets, ultraphones and mobile devices were expectedusing only xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets to reach 2.4 billion units in 2016). Every cell phone has some form of thermal management system, and we believerealize many of the new smart phones and other portable devices being developed can benefit from the thermal management properties of our XG Leaf® product line. In August 2016, International Data Corporation (IDC) insame performance benefits. We believe these characteristics will enable bulk polymer materials to perform like engineered plastic materials which command higher price points than their Worldwide Quarterly Tablet Tracker, estimated the global shipment of tablets in 2016 at 183.4 million units. Thus, we believe our XG Leaf® product line is well positioned to address a very large and rapidly growing market.commoditized neighbors.

 

22

Our Intellectual Property

 

Some of our proprietary manufacturing processes were developed at Michigan State University (MSU) and licensed to us in 2006. We license three U.S. patents and patent applications from MSU. However, overOn August 8, 2016, we signed an agreement acquiring an exclusive license to Metna’s background IP for use of graphene nanoplatelets as additives to concrete mixtures. For purposes of the agreement, Metna’s background IP relates to the U.S. Patent 8,951,343. Also, on August 8, 2016, we entered into a second agreement for an exclusive license related to all Metna’s background technology and foreground technology, including any jointly-owned foreground technology where the end use is known to be any graphite additive dispersed in concrete mixtures. Over time, our scientists and engineers have made many further discoveries and inventions that are embodied in the form of (as(and as of September 30, 2017)2018): eightten (10) additional U.S. patents, 11thirteen (13) foreign patents, 17eleven (11) additional U.S. patent applications and numerous trade secrets. For each patent application filed in the U.S., we make a determination on the nature and value of the patent. For many of the applications filed in the U.S., additional filings are made in other countries such as the European Union, Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan or other applicable countries. As of September 30, 2017,2018, we maintained 36twenty five (25) international patent applications. These filings and analyses are made on a case-by-case basis. Typically, patents that are defensive in nature are not filed abroad, while those that are protective of active XGS products or applications are filed in relevant countries abroad. Our general IP strategy is to keep as trade secrets those manufacturing processes that are difficult to enforce should they be disclosed and to seek patent coverage for other manufacturing processes, materials derived from those processes, unique combinations of materials and end uses of materials containing graphene nanoplatelets. We believe that the combination of our rights under the MSU license, our patents and patent applications, and our trade secrets create a strong intellectual property position.

 


Operating Segment

 

We have one reportable operating segment that manufactures xGnP® graphene nanoplatelets and value-added products produced therefrom, conducts research on graphene nanoplatelets and related products, and licenses our technology as appropriate. As of September 30, 2017,2018, we shipped products on a worldwide basis, but all of our assets were located within the United States.

 

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared2018 compared with the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 20162017

 

Summary Income Statement For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
     For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
     For the Three Months Ended 
September 30,
   For the Nine Months Ended 
September 30,
   
 2017 2016 Change 2017  2016  Change 
(unaudited) 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change 
Total Revenue $472,261  $163,967  $308,294  $1,038,529  $514,110  $524,419  $1,126,385 $472,261 $654,124  $2,863,575  $1,038,529 $1,825,046 
Cost of Goods Sold  716,261   367,395   348,866   1,712,875   1,172,397   540,478   1,253,116  716,261  536,855  3,573,838  1,712,875  1,860,993 
Gross Loss  (244,000)  (203,428)  (40,572)  (674,346)  (658,287)  (16,059) (126,731) (244,000) 117,269 (710,263) (674,346) (35,917) 
                        
Research & Development Expense  215,949   231,312   (15,363)  706,575   866,668   (160,093) 435,956 215,949 220,007 1,000,101         706,575 293,526 
Sales, General & Administrative Expense  1,466,505   896,650   569,855   3,386,857   2,618,252   768,605   1,297,179  1,466,505  (169,326)  3,631,652  3,386,857  244,795 
Total Operating Expense  1,682,454   1,127,962   554,492   4,093,432   3,484,920   608,512   1,733,135  1,682,454  50,681  4,631,753  4,093,432  538,321 
Operating Loss  (1,926,454)  (1,331,390)  (595,064)  (4,767,778)  (4,143,207)  (624,571) (1,859,866) (1,926,454) 66,588 (5,342,016) (4,767,778) (574,238) 
Other Income (Expense)  (105,968)  (23,687)  (82,281)  (296,983)  (136,398)  (160,585)  (81,926)  (105,968)  24,042  (247,647)  (296,983)  49,336 
Net Loss $(2,032,422) $(1,355,077) $(677,345) $(5,064,761) $(4,279,605) $(785,156) $(1,941,792) $(2,032,422) $90,630 $(5,589,663) $(5,064,761) $(524,902) 

Revenue

 

Revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, by category, are shown below.

 

Summary of Revenue For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
    For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    For the Three Months Ended 
September 30,
   For the Nine Months Ended 
September 30,
   
 2017  2016  Change  2017  2016  Change 
(unaudited) 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change 
Product Sales $446,795  $88,856  $357,939  $863,574  $230,635  $632,939  $1,126,385 $446,795 $679,590 $2,863,575 $863,574 $2,000,001 
Grants  25,466   50,111   (24,645)  124,955   208,475   (83,520)  25,466 (25,466)  124,955 (124,955) 
Licensing     25,000   (25,000)  50,000   75,000   (25,000)          50,000  (50,000) 
Total Revenue $472,261  $163,967  $308,294  $1,038,529  $514,110  $524,419  $1,126,385 $472,261 $654,124 $2,863,575 $1,038,529 $1,825,046 

23

 

Product sales consist of two broad categories: (1) material sold to customers for research or development purposes; and (2) production orders for customers. Typically, the order sizes for the first category are relatively small, however we expect orders in the second category to be much larger in the future. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, product sales increased by $357,939,$679,590, or 403%152% from the comparable period in the prior year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, product sales increased by $632,939,$2,000,001 or 274%232% from the comparable period in the prior year. The main reason for the increase in product sales was customers moving through development programs towards commercialization, requiring larger quantities of our materials for advanced testing, pilot production and commercial-scale production activities. We believe that those customers already in production will increase their order volume as demand increases and other customersothers will begin to move into commercial volume production as they gain more experience in working with our materials and engage their own customers. As a result of this movement, we shipped 1.610.4 metric tons of bulkgraphene nanoplatelets in the form of dry powders in the first quarter of 20172018 and 1.8an additional 4.4 tons of slurries, cakes and other integrated products containing graphene nanoplatelets, 11.9 metric tons of bulkgraphene nanoplatelets in the form of dry powders in the second quarter of 2017. In2018 and an additional 3.5 metric tons of slurries, cakes and other integrated products containing graphene nanoplatelets and 15.7 metric tons in the third quarter of 2017 we shipped over 5.7 metric tons and based on known customer demand we forecast shipping more than 15 metric tons of product2018, primarily in the fourth quarterform of 2017.dry powder .

 

We ship our products from our Lansing, MI manufacturing facilities to customers around the world. During the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, we shipped materials to customers in 1615 countries, as compared to 16 countries during the same three-month period in 2016.2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we shipped materials to customers in 23 different countries, versus 29 countries in 2017. For the three months ended, September 30, 2017, shipments to only one country2018, no foreign countries accounted for more than 10% of product sales, China. For the three months ended September 30, 2016, shipments to three countries, South Korea, China and the United Kingdom accounted for more than 10% of product sales.

During the first nine months ended September 30, 2017, we shipped materials to customers in 29 different countries, versus 24 countriesduring the same nine-month period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, shipments to only once country, China accounted for more than 10% of product sales. For the first nine months ended September 30, 2016, two2018, no foreign countries South Korea and the United Kingdom, accounted for more than 10% of product sales, and during the same period in 2017, shipments to two countries accounted for more than 10% of product sales. China and South Korea accounted for approximately 27% of total product sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.


Order Summary

The table below shows a comparison of domestic and international orders fulfilled (note that this does not include orders for free samples). The table also includes the average order size for product sales. These numbers indicate that our customer base remains active with research and development projects that use our materials, but that the order size is increasing as more customers order for production purposes or approach commercial status with products using our materials. The average order size for the product revenue during the first nine months ended September 30, 20172018 increased by 259%244% as compared to the same period in 2016.2017. Although the average size of these orders is still relatively small, we have begun shipping in metric ton quantities to multiple customers.

 

 For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
     For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
    
 2017  2016  Change  2017  2016  Change 
Order Summary 

For the Three Months Ended 

September 30,

    

For the Nine Months Ended 

September 30,

   
(unaudited)  2018 2017 Change  2018 2017 Change 
                           
Number of orders - domestic  22   39   (17)  89   91   (2) 49 22 27  76 89  41 
Number of orders - international  37   29   8   125   114   11   26  37  (11)   130  125  (49) 
Number of orders - total  59   68   (9)  214   205   9  75 59 16  206 214  (8
                        
Average order size for product sales recorded in r Statement of Operations $7,573  $1,307  $6,266  $4,035  $1,125  $2,910 
Percentage change          480%          259%
Average order size for product sales recorded in our Statement of Operations $15,018 $7,573 $7,445  $13,901 $4,035 $9,865 
% change     98%      244%

 

Grant Revenue

 

We received no grant revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. Grant revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $25,466 and 2016$124,955, respectively. The grant revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of proceeds$93,747 from sources as shown in the table below:

  For the Three Months Ended September 30  For the Nine Months Ended September 30 
  2017  %  2016  %  2017  %  2016  % 
                                 
Mercedes Benz North America $25,466   100% $   % $31,208   25% $   %
Department of Energy        25,111   50   93,747   75   183,475   88 
Grand Valley State        25,000   50          25,000   12 
Total $25,466   100% $50,111   100% $124,955   100% $208,475   100%

Licensing RevenueUS Department of Energy and $31,208 from Daimler / University of Michigan.

 

Licensing Revenue

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 we had no licensing revenue. Licensing revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $0 and $50,000, respectively. The Company andlicensing revenue in 2017 was from POSCO, a shareholder of the Company, entered into a license agreement dated June 8, 2011, pursuant to which POSCO agreed to pay a minimum annual royalty of $100,000 per year if certain circumstances existed, among other things. The Company believed that this minimum annual royalty became due annually beginning on February 28, 2015, and up until June 30, 2017, recorded this royalty revenue at a rate of $25,000 per quarter. POSCO disputed its obligation to pay this minimum annual royalty, and did not pay the royalty in any prior year. We filed a demand for arbitration in the International Court of Arbitration on March 9, 2016, in an effort to resolve the dispute. Pursuant to a confidential settlement, on November 3, 2017, the Company and POSCO agreed to settle the dispute and to dismiss the arbitration. Based on terms of the settlement, no allowance is considered necessary. At September 30, 2017 we have a balance of $175,000 reflected in other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. This represents an accrual of licensing revenue of $100,000 for three and a half years less 50% to reflect an estimate of the portion of 2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014 licensing fees we believed to be not collectible. At December 31, 2016 the accrued licensing fees and allowance netted together was $150,000.Company.

 

Cost of Goods Sold

 

We use a standard cost system to estimate the direct costs of products sold. Direct costs include estimates of raw material costs, packaging, freight charges net of those billed to customers, and an allocation for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Because of the nature of our production processes, there is a substantial fixed manufacturing expense requirement that represents the ongoing cost of maintaining production facilities that are not directly related to products sold, so we use a “full capacity” allocation of overhead based on an estimate of what product costs would be if the manufacturing facilities were operating on a full-time basis and producing products at the designed capacity. This estimate involves estimating both the level of expenses as well as production amounts as if the manufacturing facility were operating on a continuous 24 hour per day, 5 day per week production schedule.

 

Gross Profit Summary

24

 

The following table shows the relationship of direct costs to product sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017:

 

Gross Profit Summary For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
   For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   
 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change 
Direct Margin and Gross Profit Summary For the Three Months Ended September 30,   For the Nine Months Ended 
September 30,
   
(unaudited) 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change 
                          
Product Sales $446,795 $88,856 $357,939  $863,574 $230,635 $632,939  $1,126,385 $446,795 $679,590 $2,863,575 $863,574 $2,000,001 
Direct Costs  266,462  44,344  222,118  476,774  101,397  375,377   708,249  266,462  441,787  1,739,700  476,774  1,262,926 
Direct Cost Margin $180,333 $44,512 $135,821 $386,800 $129,238 $257,562  $418,136 $180,333 $237,803 $1,132,875 $386,800 $737,075 
% of Sales 40.4% 50.1%   44.8% 56.0%    37.1% 40.4%   39.2% 44.8%   
Unallocated Manufacturing Expense  449,799  323,051  126,748   1,236,101  1,071,000  165,101   544,867  449,799  95,068  1,834,138  1,236,101  598,037 
Gross Loss on Product Sales(1) $(269,466) $(278,539) $9,073 $(849,301) $(941,762) $92,461  $(126,731) $(269,466) $142,735 $(710,263) $(849,301) $139,038 

 


(1) Gross Loss on Product Sales excludes any licensing or grant revenues.

We believe that the fluctuations in gross loss on product sales and direct cost from period to period are not indicative of future margins because of the relatively small size of our sales in comparison to our future expectations. Direct costs vary depending on the size of an order, the specific products being ordered, and other factors like shipping destination (which on small orders can represent a significant percentage of the cost).

 

Costs associated with grant revenue tend to be a mixture of facilities use, management time, labor from scientists, technicians and manufacturing personnel, and some supplies. Because of the difficulty of developing and maintaining an administrative system to gather direct costs for grants, together with the relatively small size of grant revenue, we do not track direct costs for grant revenue as a separate cost category. Therefore, we do not calculate direct cost margins associated with grant revenue but, rather, we view this revenue as being supported by indirect corporate expenses.

Costs associated with licensing revenue tend to be a mixture of IP costs as well as management and administrative expenses that are indirect in nature. As such, we do not assign direct costs to licensing revenue. Where revenue from a license agreement can be assigned to specific product revenue, we classify this revenue as product sales and, using our standard cost system, assign direct costs to those sales.

The remaining “non-direct” costs of operating our manufacturing facilities are recorded as unallocated manufacturing expenses. These expenses include personnel costs, rent, utilities, indirect supplies, depreciation, and related indirect expenses. Unallocated manufacturing expenses are expensed as incurred. We allocate these costs to direct product costs based on the proportion of these expenses that would be representative of direct product costs if we were operating our factory at full capacity.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, unallocated manufacturing expenses increased by 39%21% to $449,799$544,867 as compared to $323,051 during the same period$449,799 in 2016, an2017. The increase of $126,748. Higher levels of manufacturing overhead expense will be incurred as we prepare for anticipated volume increases.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, unallocated manufacturing expenses increased by 15%$95,068 is largely due to $1,236,101 as compared to $1,071,000 during the same period in 2016, an increase of $165,103. In the first three quarters of 2017 we have incurred some higher levels of manufacturing overhead expense as we prepare for anticipatedand fulfill higher volume increases.commercial orders.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, unallocated manufacturing expenses increased by 48% to $1,834,138 as compared to $1,236,101 during the same period in 2017. The increase of $598,037 is largely due to higher levels of manufacturing overhead expense as we prepare for and fulfill higher volume commercial orders.

Sales, General and Administrative Expenses

During the three months ended September 30, 20172018, we incurred selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses (SGA) of $1,466,505.$1,297,179. This is an increasea decrease of $569,855approximately $169,326 or 64%11.5% from the same period in 2016, which2017. In the three months ended September 30, 2017, there was primarily the result of a one-time, non-cashnon-recurring expense charge of $501,071 recorded in July 2017 to account for the cancellation and replacementreissuance of certain stock options. See note 7option awards related to a modification in the financial statementsaward agreements executed on July 24, 2017.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 we incurred selling, general and administrative expenses (SGA) of $3,631,652 as compared to $3,386,857 for further discussionthe same period in 2017. The increase of approximately $244,795 or 7.2% from the modifications.same period in 2017, is primarily due to increases in personnel costs as a result of our growth in sales. As we continue to grow and gain traction in the marketplace we expect our SG&ASGA expenses willto fluctuate but shouldin the short term, and stabilize and become more fixed in nature as we achieve economies of scale.scale in the long term.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 we incurred SG&A expenses of $3,386,857. This is an increase of approximately $768,605 or 29% from the same period in 2016, which was primarily the result of a one-time, non-cash charge of $501,071 recorded in July 2017 to account for the cancellation and replacement of certain stock options. See note 7 in the financial statements for further discussion of the modifications. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred a $182,146 reduction in SG&A expenses associated with reclassifying certain expenses related to the DOE Phase I SBIR grant into our research and development expenses. This resulted in a reduction of SG&A expenses in 2016 that did not occur in 2017. As we continue to grow and gain traction in the marketplace our SGA expenses will fluctuate but should stabilize and become more fixed in nature as we achieve economies of scale.

Research and Development Expenses

 

Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 were $215,949$435,956 as compared to $231,312$215,949 for the same period in 2016.2017. The decreaseincrease of $15,363$220,007 or 7%101.9% is largelyprimarily due to higher expensesadditional utilization of external testing services and other increased activities in 2016our research and development area as we continue to work oncommercialize and complete the DOE Phase I SBIR grant (which was completed by June 30, 2016).expand our sales reach.

25

 

Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 were $706,575$1,000,101 as compared to $866,668$706,575 for the same period ended September 30, 2016.in 2017. The decreaseincrease of $160,093$293,526 or 18%41.5% is largelyprimarily due to higher expensesadditional utilization of external testing services, additional personnel costs and increased activities in 2016our research and development area as we continue to work oncommercialize and complete the DOE Phase I SBIR grant.expand our sales reach.

 


Other Income (Expense)

 

The following table shows a comparison of other income and expense by major component for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017:

 

Other Income (Expense) For the Three Months 
Ended September 30,
   For the Nine Months Ended 
September 30,
   For the Three Months Ended 
September 30,
   For the Nine Months Ended 
September 30,
   
(unaudited) 2018 2017 Change 2018 2017 Change 
 2017 2016 Change 2017 2016 Change             
Interest expense, net $(62,814) $(55,816) $(6,998) $(176,347) $(240,588) $64,241  $(81,926) $(62,814) $(19,112) $(250,900) $(176,347) $(74,553) 
Gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liability - warrants  (43,154)  26,738   (69,892)  (46,612)  50,799   (97,411)  (43,154) 43,154  (46,612 46,612 
Government incentives, net  —     24,000   (24,000)  (74,024)  72,000   (146,024)        3,253  (74,024)  77,277 
Loss on disposal of intangible assets  —     (18,609)  18,609   —     (18,609)  18,609 
Total $(105,968) $(23,687) $(82,281) $(296,983) $(136,398) $(160,585) $(81,926) $(105,968) $24,042 $(247,647) $(296,983) $49,336 

 

Interest expense, net of interest income in the three months endedand nine month periods ending September 30, 2017,2018, increased by $6,998 compared to$19,112 and $74,552, respectively from the same period in 2016. Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased by $64,241 compared to the same period in 2016. The decreasing balance in our lease financing agreements accounts for declining interestcomparable periods in the current year but thisprior year. The increase is offset by our draws ondue to an increase in the amount of indebtedness outstanding under the Dow Facility, (see Note 2 in the financial statements).to $5 million as of September 30, 2018, from $2 million as of September 30, 2017.

 

Gain/(loss) from changes in the fair value of derivative liability warrants from the previous valuation period are characterized as other income (expense)/other income on our Statement of Operations as a result of the GAAP requirement to use variable accounting for such instruments. These values fluctuate from period to period as a result of updating inputs used in the trinomial lattice model used to value such warrants, including risk free rate, volatility, remaining term of each warrant, and the underlying stock price assumption used in such calculations. On September 30, 2017, we adopted ASU 2017-11 and reclassified 224,897 warrants related to Series B Preferred stock from derivative liabilities to equity and we are no longer required to record the change in fair values for these instruments. See Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for more information.

 

Government incentives include accruals for incentive awards from state and local government entities relatingentities. These incentives often relate to new hires during the period indicated, net of any true up of previous accruals to reflect actual payments.or job creation activities. In 2016, we accrued $74,000 for expected incentive awards from the Michigan Economic Growth Authority (“MEGA”), based on our experience in receiving such incentive awards over the previous four years for our hiring practices. Upon review by MEGA in May 2017, our 2016 incentive was declined because of our failure to meet a baseline assumed hiring threshold, which we missed by two full-time equivalent employees by December 31, 2016.threshold. Since 2016 was the final year for this incentive award program, we wrote off this previously accrued award in the three months ended June 30, 2017, and thus we recorded a loss of $74,024 in the nine month period ending September 30, 2017.

 

Cash Flow Summary

 

The following condensed cash flow statement compares cash flow from operating, investing, and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017.

 

 For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 Change 2016 – 2017 
 2017 2016 $ % 
Cash, beginning of period $1,785,343 $1,060,224  $  725,119 68
Cash Flow Summary For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Change 2018 – 2017 
(unaudited) 2018 2017 $ % 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period(1) $3,041,590 $1,980,842 $1,060,748 54%
Net Cash provided by (used in):                  
Operating activities (3,803,899) (2,667,307) (1,136,592) 43  (4,427,199) (3,803,680) (623,519) 16%
Investing Activities (543,486) (173,451) (370,035) 213  (2,790,809) (543,486) (2,247,323) 414%
Financing Activities  3,879,803  2,418,038  1,461,765  60   7,629,040  3,879,803  3,749,237  97%
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (467,582)  (422,720)  44,862  11 
Cash, end of period $1,317,761 $637,504 $680,257  107%
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash  411,032  (467,363)  884,395  (188)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period(1) $3,452,622 $1,513,479 $1,939,143  128%

(1)Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period above were $2,845,798 and $1,785,343 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Restricted cash for a letter of credit, beginning of period above were $195,792 and $195,499 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents, end of period above were $3,262,554 and $1,317,761 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. Restricted cash for a letter of credit, end of period above were $190,068 and $195,718 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $3,803,900 and $2,667,307, respectively.

26

 

Investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 included net capital expenditures for the purchase of property and equipment of $428,015$2,665,268 and $115,470$125,541 for intellectual property as compared with $84,187$428,016 for property and equipment and $89,264$115,470 for intellectual property during the same period in 2016.2017. These levels of capital expenditures are higher as we have begun to update and install equipment necessary to increase production capacity to meet anticipated customer orders for those customers who are moving into commercialization of products containing our materials. In early June 2018 we began operations at our new manufacturing facility in Mason, Michigan. In September we started the installation of 6 new tools to add to this facility and the transfer of 6 tools from our legacy facility, and target increasing the total tool installations to 24 total by year-end.

 


Financing activities provided a net increase in cash of $3,879,803$7,629,040 and $2,418,038$3,879,803 for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. For the first nine months ended September 30, 20172018 gross proceeds from the issuance of common stock was $2,140,400$7,741,344 and stock issuance expenses were $245,972$99,943 as compared to proceeds from the issuance of common stock for the nine months ended September 30, 20162017 of $3,102,032$2,140,400 and stock issuance expenses of $538,640. Financing activities in nine months ending September 30, 2017 also included $2,000,000 of loan proceeds from the Dow Facility (see Note 3 in the financial statements) versus zero in the nine months ending September 30, 2016.$245,972.

 

Liquidity and Capital Expenditures

 

We have historically incurred losses from operations and we may continue to generate negative cash flows as we implement our business plan. Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared using US GAAP as applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

 

We originally filed the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-209131) with the SEC on April 11, 2016 which was declared effective by the SEC on April 13, 2016 (as amended, the “Registration Statement”). The Registration Statement registered up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock at a fixed price of $8.00 per share to the general public in a self-underwritten offering (the “Offering” or our “IPO”). Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement was declared effective August 26, 2016, Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 was declared effective August 31, 2016, Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 was declared effective January 17, 2017, and Post-Effective Amendments No. 4 and No. 5 were dated April 12, 2017.Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 wasdeclared effective April 14, 2017. Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 was declared effective June 26, 2018. Although we are currently selling shares of our common stock in our IPO pursuant to the Registration Statement, we have not yet listed the company for trading on any exchanges.

In December 2016, we entered into a draw loan note and agreement (the “Dow Facility”) with The Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) to provide up to $10 million of secured debt financing at an interest rate of 5% per year, drawable at our request under certain conditions. We received $2As of September 30, 2018, we had drawn $5 million at closing, $1 million on July 18, 2017, and $1 million on September 22, 2017. We currently have $1 million of additional funding available on or before December 1, 2017 under the Dow Facility. After December 1, 2017, an additional $5 million becomes available underAs a condition of the Dow Facility, ifDow required that we have raisedraise $10 million of equity capital after October 31, 2016. 2016 in order to access the second tranche of $5 million. As of September 30, 2018, we had raised $ 12,274,968from our IPO since November 1, 2016, and thus have met this requirement. Therefore, the remaining $5 million under the Dow Facility is now available to us.

 

As of November 10, 2017,September 30, 2018, we had cash on hand of $1,226,776$3,262,554. As of November 7, 2018, we had cash on hand of $5.7 million. We believe our cash from increasing commercial sales activity and currently available funds of $1 million undervarious financing sources will fund our operations for at least the Dow Facility. Our financial projections show that we may need to raise an additional $6-8 million before we are capable of achieving sustainable free cash flow after capital expenditures.next 12 months. We intend that the primary means for raising such funds will be through our ongoing IPO the additional $1 million of currently available funds under the Dow Facility, and up to an additional $5 million of proceeds from the Dow Facility in the event that we raise $10 million of additional equity capital after October 31, 2016. Thus far, we have raised approximately $3 million through the sale of 376,078 shares of common stock between November 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017 towards the requirement to raise $10 million of additional equity capital in order to open up the remaining $5 million of availability onunder the Dow Facility. There can be no assurance that we will be ableAs of November 7, 2018, there are 651,500 more shares of common stock available to raise additional equity capital insell pursuant to the IPO orRegistration Statement. If all of such shares were sold, it would result in subsequent equity offerings or that the terms and conditionsadditional gross proceeds of any future financings will be workable or acceptable to us and our stockholders.$5,212,000.

 

In the event we are unable to fund our operations from existing cash on hand, operating cash flows, additional borrowings or raising equity capital, we may be forced to reduce our expenses, slow down our growth rate, or discontinue operations. Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting EstimatesPolicies

 

In preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), we have adopted various accounting policies. Our most significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

 

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our estimates and assumptions, including those related to inventories, intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, legal proceedings, research and development, warranty obligations, product liability, fair valued liabilities, sales returns and discounts, going concern, and income taxes are updated as appropriate, which in most cases is at least quarterly. We base our estimates on historical experience, or various judgements about the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide this information.

27

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

(a)Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by SEC Rule 15d-15, our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

(b)Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 20172018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

 

The Company and POSCO, a shareholder of the Company, entered into a license agreement dated June 8, 2011, pursuant to which POSCO agreed to pay a minimum annual royalty of $100,000 per year if certain circumstances existed, among other things. The Company believed that this minimum annual royalty became due annually beginning on February 28, 2015, and up until June 30, 2017, recorded this royalty revenue at a rate of $25,000 per quarter. POSCO disputed its obligation to pay this minimum annual royalty, and did not pay the royalty in any prior year. We filed a demand for arbitration in the International Court of Arbitration on March 9, 2016, in an effort to resolve the dispute. Pursuant to a confidential settlement, on November 3, 2017, the Company and POSCO agreed to settle the dispute and to dismiss the arbitration. Based on terms of the settlement, no allowance is considered necessary.None.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide this information.

  

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 20162018 we issued 7,14010,663 shares per period of Series A Preferred Stock to Aspen Advanced Opportunity Fund, LP as payment for lease financing obligations under the terms of the Master Lease Agreement dated March 18, 2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 we issued a total of 21,420 shares per period as payment for lease obligations.

On August 10, 2017, we granted 2,500 shares of restricted stock to each of the following independent Board members as Board compensation: Steven C. Jones, Arnold Allemang, Dave Pendell, and Peifeng (Molly) Zhang. These shares vest 25% on the last day of each fiscal quarter on September 30, 2017, December 31, 2017, March 31, 2018, and June 30, 2017. Such shares were issued pursuant to the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan.

  

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

None.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

 

None


28

 


Item 6. Exhibits.

 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER
 DESCRIPTION LOCATION
     
10.1Updated Form of Subscription Agreement for Primary OfferingIncorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-1, as amended, filed with the SEC on April 13, 2017
     
10.331.1  2017 Equity Incentive PlanIncorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 25, 2017
31.1 Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith
     
32.131.2 

Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith

32.1Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant Toto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002* Filed herewith
     
101. INS XBRL Instance Document Filed herewith
     
101. CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Link base Document Filed herewith
     
101. DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Link base Document Filed herewith
     
101. LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Link base Document Filed herewith
     
101. PRE XBRL Extension Presentation Link base Document Filed herewith
     
101. SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme Document Filed herewith

 


 31

29

 


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Reportand in the capacities and on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

XG SCIENCES, INC.dates indicated.

 

Dated: November 13, 2017

December 10, 2018
By: /s/ Philip L. Rose
 Name: Philip L. Rose
 Title: Chief Executive Officer, President
Treasurer,and Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
    
Dated: November 13, 2017December 10, 2018By: /s/ Corinne LyonJacqueline Lemke
 Name: Corinne LyonJacqueline Lemke
 Title: Controller Chief Financial Officerand Principal AccountingFinancial Officer

 

30

 32