UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019

OR

☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 001-14015

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

(Exact  (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company .company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the exchange act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No ☒

As of November 12, 2017May 13, 2019, there were 157,785,520204,197,396 shares of the issuer’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017March 31, 2019

(Unaudited)

1.    BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND GOING CONCERN

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Applied Energetics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary North Star Power Engineering, Inc. as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 (collectively, “company,” “Applied Energetics,” “we,” “our” or “us”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented have been made. The results for the three month and nine month periodsthree-month period ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, may not be indicative of the results for the entire year. The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the company’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, the company incurred a net loss of approximately $586,000, had negative cash flows from operations of $648,000 and may incur additional future losses due to the reduction in Government contract activity. These matters raise substantial doubt as to the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to developing its business and raising capital and there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts will be successful. No assurance can be given that management’s actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

In order to improve the company’s liquidity, the company’s management is actively pursuing additional equity financing through discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its effort to secure additional equity financing.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

LIQUIDITY AND MANAGEMENT’S PLAN

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the company incurred a net loss of approximately $464,000,$586,000, had negative cash flows from operations of approximately $99,000$648,000, conducted financing activities yielding $400,000 in proceeds from notes payable and $150,000 in proceeds from issuance of common stock and expects to incur additional future losses due to the reactivation of its business activities. These matters raise substantial doubt as to the company’s ability to continue as a going concern unless the company is able to obtain additional financing for its continuing operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the company had approximately $15,000$81,000 in cash and cash equivalents.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its assumptions on historical experiences and on various other estimates that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In addition, management considers the basis and methodology used in developing and selecting these estimates, the trends in and amounts of these estimates, specific matters affecting the amount of and changes in these estimates, and any other relevant matters related to these estimates, including significant issues concerning accounting principles and financial statement presentation. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future, as more information becomes known which could materially impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein. Significant estimates include measurements of income tax assets and liabilities.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2019
(Unaudited)

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The company has reviewed issued accounting pronouncements and plans to adopt those that are applicable to it. The company does not expect the adoption of any other pronouncements to have an impact on its results of operations or financial position.

2.        SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Share-Based Compensation – Contractors

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, share-based compensation expense totaled approximately $65,000$123,000 and $63,000,$21,000, respectively.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

There was no related income tax benefit recognized because our deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance.

We determine the fair value of option grant share-based awards at their grant date, using a Black-Scholes-Merton Option-Pricing Model applying the assumptions in the following table:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 the company granted each member of the Scientific Advisory Board options to purchase 2 million shares of $.001 par value common stock at a price of $0.05 per share. These options have a five year term and vest to the extent of 500,000 shares on the first anniversary of the grant and to the extent of 62,500 options per month during the 24 months following the initial vesting date.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 the company also granted each member of the Scientific Advisory Board performance options to purchase 1.5 million shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a price of $0.25 per share. These options have a five year term and vest on the date the company has cumulative revenues of $5 million.

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017, 14,000,000March 31, 2019, no options to purchase stock were granted, additionally, no options to purchase stock were exercised, expired or forfeited; no restricted stock units were granted, vested or forfeited; and no restricted stock awards were granted, vested or forfeited. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, options to purchase 14,000,00027,750,000 shares of common stock were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.136 with$0.104, a weighted average remaining contract term of approximately 4.56.2 years with an aggregate intrinsic value of $-0-.$1,048,000. At September 30, 2017 noMarch 31, 2019 options for 12,145,000 shares were exercisable.

As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, there was approximately $121,000$429,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted and outstanding, net of estimated forfeitures. The cost is expected to be recognized on a weighted average basis over a period of approximately three years.one year.

During the three month ended March 31, 2019, the company received $400,000 in proceeds from the issuance of notes payable maturing September 1, 2019, with which the company also issued warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of the company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at an exercise price of $0.07 per share for two years from the date of issuance. The notes bear interest of 10% payable at maturity. On maturity date, the company may elect to convert the balance of principal and interest due into shares of common stock at the conversion price of $0.10 a share.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2019
(Unaudited)

3.         NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period before giving effect to stock options, stock warrants, restricted stock units and convertible securities outstanding, which are considered to be dilutive common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive shares outstanding during the period after giving effect to convertible preferred stock, stock options, warrants and restricted stock units. Contingently issuable shares are included in the computation of basic loss per share when issuance of the shares is no longer contingent. Due to the losses from continuing operations for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, basic and diluted loss per common share were the same, as the effect of potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

Potentially dilutive securities not included in the diluted loss per share calculation, due to net losses from continuing operations, were as follows:

4.         DIVIDENDS

Dividends on Preferred Stock are accrued when the amount and kind of the dividend is determined and are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May, August and November, in cash or shares of common stock. The holders of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends at the initial rate of 6.5% of the liquidation preference per share (the “Initial Dividend Rate”), payable, at the option of the corporation, in (i) cash, or(ii) shares of our common stock (valued for such purpose at 95% of the weighted average of the last sales prices of our common stock for each of the trading days in the ten trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the applicable dividend payment date) provided that the issuance and/or aresale of all such shares of our common stock are then covered by an effective registration statement or (iii) any combination of cash and common stock. Upon the occurrence offoregoing. If the company’s failurecompany fails to pay dividends in the five business days following a dividend payment date (a “Payment Default”), the dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase to 7.5% of the liquidation preference per share for as long as such Payment Default continues (or return to the Initial Dividend Rate at such time as such Payment Default no longer continues), and if a Payment Default shall occur on two consecutive Dividend Payment Dates, the dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase to 10% of the Liquidation Preference for as long as such Payment Default continues and shall immediately and automatically return to the Initial Dividend Rate at such time as the Payment Default is no longer continuing.

As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, we had 13,602 shares of our 6.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. The company has not paid the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013. Dividend arrearages as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was approximately $145,000.$196,000. Our Board of Directors suspended the declaration of the dividend, commencing with the dividend payable as of February 1, 2015 since we did not have a surplus (as such term is defined in the Delaware general corporationGeneral Corporation Law) as of December 31, 2014, until such time as we have a surplus or net profits for a fiscal year.

Our Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25.00 per Share.

5.         NOTES PAYABLE

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the company received $400,000 from three non-affiliated individuals based on 10% Promissory Notes (“Notes”). The Series A PreferredNotes mature September 1, 2019. The Notes are accompanied by a Common Stock bears dividends atPurchase Warrant (a “Warrant”) entitling the rate of 6.5%holder to purchase one share of the liquidation preferencecompany’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Shares”), for each $2.00 of Note principle, at an exercise price of $0.07 per annum, which accruesshare, for two years from the date of issuance, and is payable quarterly. Dividends may be paid in: (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock (valued for such purpose at 95% of the weighted average of the last sales prices of our common stock for each of the trading days in the ten trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the applicable dividend payment date), provided that the issuance and/or resale of all such shares of our common stock are then covered by an effective registration statement or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. If the Company fails to make a dividend payment within five business days following a dividend payment date, the dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase by 1% from 6.5% of the liquidation preference per offered share of Series A preferred stock to 7.5% of such liquidation preference. If a payment default shall occur on two consecutive dividend payment dates, the dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase to 10% of the liquidation preference for as long as such payment default continues and shall immediately and automatically return to the Initial dividend rate at such time as the payment default is no longer continuing.issuance.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2017

March 31, 2019
(Unaudited)

5.       NOTES PAYABLE

On September 15, 2017 the Companycompany borrowed $53,000 under a convertible note maturing June 20, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’scompany’s $0.001 par value common stock after March 24, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 58% of the average of the lowest one dayone-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the Company’scompany’s then issued and outstanding Common Stock.common stock. The Companycompany at the request of the Note Holdernote holder has reserved 36,369,879 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The Note is prepayablenote can be prepaid at the Company’scompany’s option until the Initial Conversion Date. The following reconciles notes payable ascompany issued the note holder warrants to purchase 1,320,598 shares of September 30,it’s $0.001 par value common stock at an exercise price of $0.0301, The Warrants are exercisable at any time over a 7-year period commencing on the date of issuance. The company calculated a beneficial conversion feature of $53,000 on this note against which approximately $53,000 has been amortized.

The above transaction of a note for $53,000 and attached warrants of 1,320,598 shares were put in place by previous management. On March 12, 2018, the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced loan and attached warrant and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the $53,000 convertible note funded on October 18, 2017, and December 31, 2016:

additionally repurchase the warrant. On March 16, 2018, the company paid in full the $53,000 convertible note and cancelled its associated warrant to purchase 1,320,598 shares of common stock in a negotiated transaction. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market, and was considered to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The total cost to the company to pay off this $53,000 note before the conversion date was $81,000. Additionally, the company cancelled the above referenced attached warrant which allowed the loan holder to purchase 1,320,598 shares of common stock at a material discount to the market. This warrant was given to the noteholder by previous management as an incentive to make the above referenced loan. The cost to the company to cancel the warrant was $40,000. The total combined cost to the company to cancel the loan and warrant was $121,000. The payment was comprised of $56,000 principal and accrued interest, prepayment premium of $25,000 and $40,000 to buy back the warrant. The note was paid in full on March 16, 2018. The company borrowed the $121,000 used to pay off this loan before the conversion date, via an interest free loan from two directors of the company.

On October 18, 2017January 8, 2018 the Companycompany borrowed $33,000$105,000 under a convertible note maturing July 20,August 28, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty-four percent (24%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after April 27, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 55% of the lowest one-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on any conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. The note holder may increase the 4,99% limit to 9.99% on 61 days prior notice to the company. The company, at the request of the note holder, has reserved 40 million shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until May 29, 2018. The company also entered into a security agreement pledging substantially all of its assets except for those related to Laser Guided Energy as collateral for the note.

The above transaction of a note for $105,000 was put in place by previous management. On April 25, 2018, the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on January 08, 2017 in the amount of $105,000, the board agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note before its conversion date. The note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market, in addition it pledged virtually all the assets of the company as collateral. The company’s board of directors considered this to be a significant derivative event that was extremely dilutive to existing shareholders. Additionally, it was the opinion of the company’s board of directors that this loan harmed the future abilities of the company to operate as a going concern and would make it nearly impossible to raise money in the future. The cost to the company to pay off this $105,000 note before the conversion date was $163,000 The payment was executed as paid in full on April 27, 2018 and was comprised of $109,000 principal and accrued interest, and a prepayment premium of $54,000 for a total of $163,000.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2019
(Unaudited) 

On March 8, 2018 the company borrowed $26,500 under a convertible note maturing December 15, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’scompany’s $0.001 par value common stock after April 16,September 5, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 58%51% of the average of the lowest one day trading price during the twentythirty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the Company’scompany’s then issued and outstanding Common Stock. The Companycompany at the request of the Note Holder has reserved 18,062,39711,008,640 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The Note is prepayablenote can be prepaid at the Company’scompany’s option until the Initial Conversion Date.

The above transaction of a note for $26,500 was put in place by previous management. On May 4, 2018 the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on December 27, 2017 in the amount of $26,500 and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note which was put in place by previous management. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market and was considered by the company to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The cost to the company to pay off this $26,500 note before the conversion date was $37,000. The payment was comprised of $27,000 principal and accrued interest, and prepayment premium of $10,000. The note was paid in full on May 18, 2018.

The following reconciles notes payable as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

6.         EQUITYDUE TO RELATED PARTIES

It has come to the board’s attention that on July 31, 2018, our now deceased CEO deposited $50,000 into the company’s account. Although it has been suggested that the funds may have been intended for use toward Mr. Dearmin’s healthcare, the board does not know for certain what the purpose of the funds were or the nature of any intended investment. Accordingly, the board is investigating the appropriate disposition of the funds which will likely be to the estate of Mr. Dearmin. Until such a determination is made, the board does not intend to use these funds for any corporate purpose. For reporting purposes, the company has treated the deposit as a due to related party.

7.        SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT

During January 2019, the nine months ended September 30, 2017company received $150,000 from three individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 2,500,002,500,000 shares of its common stock for $62,500, or $0.025 per share through subscription agreements with three investors. The company alsostock.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2019

(Unaudited)

On January 24, 2018, we issued 500,0001,242,710 shares of common stock in April 2017,settlement of invoices valued at $10,000 or $0.02 per share,$38,524 with a vendor. This transaction was consummated by previous management to a consultant for services.

In September, 2017, Company borrowed $53,000 under a convertible note maturing June 20, 2018. The Company issued the note holder warrants to purchase 1,320,598 shares of it’s $0.001 par value common stock at an exercise price of $0.0301, The Warrants are exercisable at any time over a 7 year period commencing on the date of issuance.

7.       LEGAL PROCEEDINGSpay its attorney fees.

On AugustDecember 4, 2017 theprevious management entered into a financial services agreement with BMA Securities for which, on January 26, 2018, it issued 5,000,000 shares of stock valued at $150,000.

As previously reported legal proceeding Three of the Company’s shareholdersin our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2018, on July 3, 2018, we commenced an action entitled Superius Securities Group, Inc.et. al. vs George Farley, et.al. (CA No. 2017-0024-VCMR)a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery of the stateState of Delaware against the company’s former director and principal executive officer George Farley and AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”).

The lawsuit alleges to the following six causes of action:

This report provides an update on the progress of the litigation.

In connection with the lawsuit, the company requested a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock which the company alleges were improperly issued. On July 20, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer, alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

On July 26, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order setting dates and deadlines for, among other matters, a hearing and briefing schedule on the amount of the bond the company would be required to post to maintain the “status quo” order through the preliminary injunction hearing, a hearing and briefing schedule on the motion for a preliminary injunction, and a discovery schedule.

Also, in connection with the lawsuit, on August 8, 2018, the company filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Farley’s attorney, Ryan Whalen, who had previously represented the company.

On August 14, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order requiring the company to post a bond in the total amount of $200,446.52. On August 21, 2018, the company posted the bond via Atlantic Specialty Insurance company acting as surety. Pursuant to the contract between the company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance company, the company deposited $200,446.52 in cash as collateral for the surety agreement.

On August 23, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery court extended the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction to October 23, 2018, and simultaneously ordered an increase in the bond amount of $55,446.52. On August 30, 2018, the company posted the increased bond amount, again with Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company acting as surety, and deposited the additional $55,446.52 in cash with the surety.

On September 7, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order setting a briefing schedule on the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On September 10, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order governing the production and exchange of confidential documents and information among the parties in discovery.

In another Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2018, the company updated the status of the litigation to include events that occurred up to that date. This report further updates the progress of the litigation.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2019

(Unaudited)

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order continuing the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants George Farley and AMC to December 14, 2018.

The October 16, 2018 order also required the company to increase its bond amount by an additional $185,301.86 ($80,301.86 for AMC and $105,000.00 for Mr. Farley) to account for the continued hearing date. On October 24, 2018, the company posted the additional bond amount of $185,301.86.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order denying the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Memorandum Opinion, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly issued. On January 24, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a revised Memorandum Opinion correcting calculations regarding the increased bond amount.

In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was dismissed.likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically, the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC. Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares represented one eighth of the company’s outstanding ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway to revitalize its business.

The company had previously requested the temporary restraining order on July 20, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer, alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the company’s motion for the preliminary injunction.

In its Memorandum Opinion, the Court also required that the company post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for the surety agreement to $582,377.26. The company posted the additional bond amount, and deposited the additional cash amount with the surety, on January 29, 2019.

On March 4, 2019, the company filed an amended complaint adding claims against Mr. Farley concerning loans Mr. Farley caused the company take from PowerUp Lending Group Ltd. and Auctus Fund LLC from September 2017 through March 2018. Mr. Farley responded to the amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(7). The company’s opposition to this motion is due on or before May 8, 2019.

In a related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging the following:

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2019

(Unaudited)

The complaint against Stein Riso followed the issuance, on January 23, 2019, of a Memorandum Opinion granting the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the case against George Farley and AMC. Stein Riso has responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company intends to amend its complaint in response.

The company, Stein Riso, Mr. Farley and AnneMarieCo., LLC have scheduled a mediation for June 4, 2019, in New York City.

As with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.

We may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.

8.       SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In April and May 2019, the company received $300,000 from four non-affiliated individuals based on 10% Promissory Notes (“Notes”). The Notes mature September 1, 2019. The Notes are accompanied by a Common Stock Purchase Warrant entitling the holder to purchase one share of the company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, for each $2.00 of Note principle, at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, for two years from the date of issuance.

During April 2019, the company entered into a premium financing agreement to finance its director and officer insurance policy. The principal is $77,612, with ten monthly payments of $8,027 and an interest rate of 7.4%.

The company’s management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the date of our most recent balance sheet, through the date our financial statements were issued. Where applicable, all material subsequent events have been disclosed in their respective footnotes..footnotes.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures included elsewhere herein and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the securities laws. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to the historical or current facts and can be identified by the use of forward lookingforward-looking words such as “may”, “believe”, “will”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “expect”, “project”, “anticipate”, “estimates”, “possible”, “plan”, “strategy”, “target”, “prospect” or “continue” and other similar terms and phrases. These forward lookingforward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future results of operations and financial condition and may cause our actual results, performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations are described in Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. We do not assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

Overview

Applied Energetics, Inc., (The “Company”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our executive office is located at 2480 W Ruthrauff Road, Suite 140 Q, Tucson, Arizona, 85705 and our telephone number is85705; (520) 628-7415. www.aergs.com

StartingApplied Energetics, Inc., specializes in the fourth quarterdevelopment and manufacture of 2014advanced high-performance lasers, high voltage electronics, advanced optical systems, and through the first quarter of 2017, the company reported as a “shell company” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended due to the suspension its previous business activities in October, 2014. The Company has developed a comprehensive researchintegrated guided energy systems for defense, aerospace, industrial, and development program and commenced R&D Activities in April, 2017. Accordingly, the Company is no longer a “shell company” and is reporting as a “smaller reporting company”.scientific customers worldwide.

The CompanyTechnology

Applied Energetics has reactivateddeveloped, successfully demonstrated and holds all critical ownership rights to a dynamic Directed Energy technology called Laser Guided Energy (“LGE”) and its previouscompanion Laser Induced Plasma Channel (LIPC). LGE and LIPC are technologies that can be used in a new generation of high-tech weapons. Currently, there are two key types of Directed Energy Weapon (“DEW”) technologies, High Energy Lasers (“HEL”), and High-Power Microwave (“HPM”). Neither HEL or HPM are owned by a single entity. Now, there is a third DEW technology, LGE. Applied Energetics’ LGE and LIPC technologies are wholly owned by Applied Energetics, and are patent protected with 25 current patents and an additional 11 Government Sensitive Patent Applications (“GSPA”). The GSPA’s are held under secrecy orders of the US government and allow the company greatly extended protection rights.

Applied Energetics technology is vastly different than conventional directed energy weapons, i.e. HEL, and HPM. LGE uses Ultra-Short Pulse (USP) technology to combine the speed and precision of lasers with the overwhelming punch of high-voltage electricity. This advanced “man-made lightning” allows extremely high peak power and energy, with target and effects tenability, and is effective against a wide variety of potential targets. A key element of LGE is its novel ability to offer selectable and tunable properties that can help protect non-combatants and combat zone infrastructure.

As Applied Energetics moves toward the future, our business activities pursuant to Teaming and Consulting Agreements with (i) Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. (“AOS”), (ii) Stephen W. McCahon, Ph.D., onestrategy reflects upon the significant value of the company’s founders, a significant shareholder of the Companykey intellectual properties, including LGE and owner of AOS, who was primarily responsible for development of the Company’s existing Intellectual Property portfolio,LIPC, and (iii) each of the members of the Scientific Advisory Board (collectively the “Consultants”).

The members of the Scientific Advisory Board (‘SAB”) have agreed to assist in our Strategic Roadmap Development, expected R&D activities, and provide a sound technical basis for future teaming, investment, and market analysis. These members have been chosen based upon their areas of subject matter expertise and senior experience levels that span both the Department of Defense (“DOD”). and commercial sectors

The company is engaged in the design, development of applied energy systems for military and commercial applications andrelated technologies involving Advanced Ultra Short Pulse lasersShort-Pulse (“AUSP”) and high voltage lasers for commercial applications. Our goal is to increase the energy and power while decreasing the size, weight, and cost of AUSP lasers. We expect to develop very high energy and power scaled AUSP lasers that have a very broad range of applicability for Department of Defense, commercial, and medical applications. Although the current market for AERG’s LGE technology is the U.S. Government, the AUSP technologies will provide numerous platforms for commercial and medical, markets creating a substantially larger product market.potentially next generation Counter-IED (CIED) technologies.

The Company owns intellectual property that is integralGeneral Corporate View, 1st Quarter, 2019:

Last year was one of significant corporate transition and necessarypositive change for Applied Energetics. We effected these positive changes, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the developmentyear, which were important steps to re-constituting the company.

As we move through 2019, Applied Energetics’ board of Laser Guided Energydirectors and Direct Discharge Electrical productsits executive management team have been actively laying the groundwork for military and commercial uses andaccretive events going forward. More specifically, we expect 2019 to be a year of significant new opportunities involving the Consultants have the facilities and technical knowhow to utilize the Company’s intellectual propertycompany’s advanced technology portfolio. This includes important work being done in the developmentarea of aultra-short pulse technologies. We also expect it to solidify the next generation of Advanced Ultra-Short Pulse Lasers. The Parties have also agreedLGE technologies. We anticipate that these two areas will be the cornerstone of Applied Energetics’ future, and represent great promise and potentially significant opportunities for the company.

During the first quarter of 2019 the company worked toward its business objectives which laid the foundation for several recent additional accomplishments. By Unanimous Written Consent dated as of April 18, 2019, the board of directors of Applied Energetics appointed Gregory Quarles to cooperateserve as its Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors effective May 6, 2019.

Dr. Quarles will lead the company in the proposalits development of next generation advanced defense technologies based on ultra-short pulse and fulfillmentLGE technologies. Dr. Quarles is an experienced CEO, and Board Member, and renowned physicist with over 30 years of researchexperience in driving cutting-edge laser, optics, and photonics technology development contractsand operations within advanced industrial companies. Additionally, Dr. Quarles is a globally recognized leader for branches ofhis strategic partnerships with the Department of Defense agenciesand his innovative work in the progression of global materials research, specifically developing new laser devices for a variety of military, medical, and industrial applications. With a deep understanding of every segment and technology area we currently address, Greg has the skills to understand the dynamics, importance and size of the Federal Governmentmany significant and rapidly evolving growth opportunities unique to Applied Energetics. We are fortunate to have such a high caliber individual as CEO of Applied Energetics.

Additionally, effective April 29, 2019, Applied Energetics has established a Board of Advisors to work with its Board of Directors and key management personnel on specific areas of significance to the company. Applied Energetics appointed Christopher “Chris” Donaghey as its first member. Chris comes highly qualified and is familiar with Applied Energetics, and its key technologies. We expect Chris to have significant input into the strategic direction of the company and provide assistance in building lasting relationships in our defense markets.

Mr. Donaghey currently serves as the senior vice president and head of corporate development for Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”), a $6.5 billion revenue defense and government agency technology integrator. As an executive of SAIC, Donaghey works closely with SAIC’s senior management to support the development and implementation of SAIC’s strategic plan with an emphasis on M&A to complement organic growth strategies and value creation.

Prior to joining SAIC, Mr. Donaghey was vice president of Corporate Strategy and Development for Key W Corporation, a national security solutions provider for the Intelligence, Cyber and Counterterrorism communities, where he guided the overall corporate strategy, M&A, and capital markets activities.

Mr. Donaghey was also a senior research analyst for SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Capital Markets where he provided investment advice and insight to institutional investors covering public defense technology, government IT services, and commercial aerospace industries. During his tenure at SunTrust, Mr. Donaghey was ranked the number one defense analyst and number two analyst overall for stock selection by Forbes/Starmine in 2005 and was named in the Wall Street Journal Best on the Street survey in 2005, 2008, and 2009.

Also, during the first quarter 2019, Applied Energetics retained corporate communications firm Cameron Associates to provide investor relations services on behalf of the Company including counseling management on appropriate investor communications, preparing and distributing press releases and other Defense contractorspublic documents, orchestrating conference calls and responding to investor inquiries. Cameron Associates and its principal, Kevin McGrath, worked closely with Applied Energetics as investor relations consultants starting from the Company’s inception in 2004 through 2011. We are pleased to welcome both Kevin McGrath and Cameron back as Applied Energetics moves forward with its corporate business plan.

In a related event and in other researchconjunction with the hiring of Cameron Associates, on February 22, 2019, Applied Energetics entered into a Consulting and development activities relatingAdvisory Services Agreement with WCCventures, LLC. Under the Agreement, WCCventures will provide advice and guidance to lasers. Wemanagement in three key respects as follows:

In summary, through our analysis of the market, and in discussions with potential clients and with our close corporate advisors, we have concluded that customers are preparing forbecoming more receptive and interested in ultra-short pulse lasers and directed energy technologies. As a result of this, we are excited about the next stagegrowth opportunities involving these applications and believe we are in the early stages of LGE development that involves the development of Advanced USP Laser Technologies. These lasers will allow for LGE weapon systems to be mounted on mobile platforms for multiple Anti-Terrorist missions including Counter Optical Measures, Counter-Improvised Explosive Devices (“C-IED”), Vehicle Stopping, and many others.a potentially large directed energy technology growth curve.

We expect to team with a major Defense Contractor for co-development and manufacture of military products. We also intend to team with a leading commercial laser technology manufacturer for co-development of commercial products resulting from our research and development efforts.RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

COMPARISON OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017MARCH 31, 2019 AND 2016:2018:

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $35,000$265,000 to $180,000$457,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $145,000$192,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 primarily due to anthe increase of professional expenses of $39,000 partially offset by a decrease$296,000, an increase in supplies and insurance expense of $18,000, an increase in travel expense of $6,000, an increase in building expenses of $5,000 and miscellaneous feesan increase in depreciation expense of $4,000.$3,000.

SELLING AND MARKETING

Selling and marketing expenses increased approximately $52,000 to $52,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to $-0- for the three months ended March 31, 2018 primarily due to the continuation of business development activities through our Master Services Agreement with Westpark Advisors.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development expenses increased approximately $46,000 to $73,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 primarily due to the continuation of research and development activities through our teaming agreement with Applied Optical Sciences, Inc.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense decreased approximately $101,000 to $4,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to $105,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 primarily due to a significant reduction in the amortization of the notes payable beneficial conversion factor.

NET LOSS

Our operations for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 resulted in a net loss of approximately $181,000,$586,000, an increase of approximately $36,000$262,000 compared to the $145,000$324,000 loss for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

COMPARISON OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016:

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $68,000 to $464,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $396,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 primarily due to an increase in professional expenses of $84,000 partially offset by a $15,000 reduction offees, the increase in research and development costs, an increase in selling and marketing, an increase in supplies and insurance and miscellaneous fees,expense and a $2,000 reduction in building costs.interest expense. 

OTHER INCOME

Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 reduced $3,000 from the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to our reduced interest bearing balances.

NET LOSS

Our operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 resulted in a net loss of approximately $464,000, an increase of approximately $70,000 compared to the $394,000 loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, we had approximately $15,000$81,000 of cash and cash equivalents, an increasea decrease of approximately $14,000$98,000 from December 31, 2016.2018. During the first ninethree months of 20172019, the net cash outflow from operating activities was approximately $99,000.$648,000. This amount was comprised primarily of our net loss of $464,000 partially offset by$586,000, an increase in our accruedother long term assets of $141,000, a decrease in accounts payable of $129,000 and an increase in prepaid expenses and deposits of $235,000,$36,000, partially offset by noncash stock based compensation of $65,000, warrant$123,000, a decrease in other receivable of 60,000, an increase in accrued expenses and compensation of $54,000, interest expense of $41,000$4,000, and accounts payabledepreciation and amortization of $24,000, investing activities had no activity, and financing$3,000. Financing activities reflected $63,000 proceeds from the sale of common stock and $50,000$400,000 in proceeds from a note payable and $150,000 in proceeds from issuance of common stock, resulting in net cash inflowoutflow of approximately $14,000.$98,000.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, the company incurred a net loss of approximately $586,000, had negative cash flows from operations of $648,000 and may incur additional future losses due to the reduction in Government contract activity. These matters raise substantial doubt as to the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to developing its business and raising capital and there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts will be successful. No assurance can be given that management’s actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

In order to improve the company’s liquidity, the company’s management is actively pursuing additional equity financing through discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its effort to secure additional equity financing.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

In their report accompanying our financial statements, our independent auditors stated that our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20162018 were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern, and that they have substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors’ have noted that our recurring losses from operations and need to raise additional capital to sustain operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

BACKLOG OF ORDERS

At November 9, 2017,At May 13, 2019, we had a backlog (workload remaining on signed contracts) of $0, to be completed within the next twelve months.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019. Based on that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, thereCHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There was no significant change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report, which has materially affected, or which is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 9, 2018, on July 3, 2018, we commenced a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the company’s former director and principal executive officer George Farley and AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”).

The lawsuit alleges to the following six causes of action:

This report provides an update on the progress of the litigation.

In connection with the lawsuit, the company requested a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock which the company alleges were improperly issued. On July 20, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer, alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

On July 26, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order setting dates and deadlines for, among other matters, a hearing and briefing schedule on the amount of the bond the company would be required to post to maintain the “status quo” order through the preliminary injunction hearing, a hearing and briefing schedule on the motion for a preliminary injunction, and a discovery schedule.

Also, in connection with the lawsuit, on August 8, 2018, the company filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Farley’s attorney, Ryan Whalen, who had previously represented the company.

On August 14, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order requiring the company to post a bond in the total amount of $200,446.52. On August 21, 2018, the company posted the bond via Atlantic Specialty Insurance company acting as surety. Pursuant to the contract between the company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance company, the company deposited $200,446.52 in cash as collateral for the surety agreement.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATIONOn August 23, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery court extended the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction to October 23, 2018, and simultaneously ordered an increase in the bond amount of $55,446.52. On August 30, 2018, the company posted the increased bond amount, again with Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company acting as surety, and deposited the additional $55,446.52 in cash with the surety.

On September 7, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order setting a briefing schedule on the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On September 10, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order governing the production and exchange of confidential documents and information among the parties in discovery.

In another Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2018, the company updated the status of the litigation to include events that occurred up to that date. This report further updates the progress of the litigation.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order continuing the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants George Farley and AMC to December 14, 2018.

The October 16, 2018 order also required the company to increase its bond amount by an additional $185,301.86 ($80,301.86 for AMC and $105,000.00 for Mr. Farley) to account for the continued hearing date. On October 24, 2018, the company posted the additional bond amount of $185,301.86.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order denying the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Memorandum Opinion, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly issued. On January 24, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a revised Memorandum Opinion correcting calculations regarding the increased bond amount.

In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically, the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC. Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares represented one eighth of the company’s outstanding ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway to revitalize its business.

The company had previously requested the temporary restraining order on July 20, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer, alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the company’s motion for the preliminary injunction.

In its Memorandum Opinion, the Court also required that the company post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for the surety agreement to $582,377.26. The company posted the additional bond amount, and deposited the additional cash amount with the surety, on January 29, 2019.

On March 4, 2019, the company filed an amended complaint adding claims against Mr. Farley concerning loans Mr. Farley caused the company take from PowerUp Lending Group Ltd. and Auctus Fund LLC from September 2017 through March 2018. Mr. Farley responded to the amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(7). The company’s opposition to this motion is due on or before May 8, 2019.

In a related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging the following:

The complaint against Stein Riso followed the issuance, on January 23, 2019, of a Memorandum Opinion granting the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the case against George Farley and AMC. Stein Riso has responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company intends to amend its complaint in response.

The company, Stein Riso, Mr. Farley and AnneMarieCo., LLC have scheduled a mediation for June 4, 2019, in New York City.

As with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.

We may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

Date: November 14, 2017May 15, 2019