
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☑ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-32327

The Mosaic Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware			20-1026454
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

101 East Kennedy Blvd

Suite 2500

Tampa, Florida 33602

(800) 918-8270

(Address and zip code of principal executive offices and registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	MOS	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: ~~379,896,944~~361,993,312 shares of Common Stock as of ~~July 30, 2021.~~April 29, 2022.


Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PART I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings ~~(Loss)~~

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

3027

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4842

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

5145

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Item 1A.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

5649

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Item 6.


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS ~~(LOSS)~~

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


		Three months ended				Six months ended					Three months ended
		June 30, 2021		June 30, 2020		June 30, 2021		June 30, 2020			March 31, 2022		March 31, 2021
Net sales	Net sales	$	2,800.7	$	2,044.7	$	5,097.8	$	3,842.8	Net sales	$	3,922.3	$	2,297.1
Cost of goods sold	Cost of goods sold	2,048.4		1,787.7		3,910.6		3,544.4		Cost of goods sold	2,483.2		1,862.2
Gross margin	Gross margin	752.3		257.0		1,187.2		298.4		Gross margin	1,439.1		434.9
Selling, general and administrative expenses	Selling, general and administrative expenses	107.6		95.1		209.3		163.0		Selling, general and administrative expenses	132.4		101.7

Mine closure costs		158.1		0		158.1		0

Other operating expense	Other operating expense	2.6		76.1		22.6		115.8		Other operating expense	50.9		20.0
Operating earnings	Operating earnings	484.0		85.8		797.2		19.6		Operating earnings	1,255.8		313.2

Interest expense, net	Interest expense, net	(37.3)		(49.3)		(82.3)		(90.4)		Interest expense, net	(39.3)		(45.0)
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)	Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)	111.1		34.1		65.3		(180.1)		Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)	310.7		(45.8)
Other income	Other income	1.4		2.4		4.4		6.9		Other income	0.2		3.0
Earnings (loss) from consolidated companies before income taxes		559.2		73.0		784.6		(244.0)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		115.9		(2.7)		175.6		(135.7)
Earnings (loss) from consolidated companies		443.3		75.7		609.0		(108.3)
Equity in net (loss) of nonconsolidated companies		(4.5)		(29.8)		(12.0)		(49.8)
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests		438.8		45.9		597.0		(158.1)
Less: Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		1.6		(1.5)		3.1		(2.5)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Mosaic		$	437.2	$	47.4	$	593.9	$	(155.6)
Basic net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic		$	1.15	$	0.13	$	1.56	$	(0.41)
Earnings from consolidated companies before income taxes										Earnings from consolidated companies before income taxes	1,527.4		225.4
Provision for income taxes										Provision for income taxes	372.4		59.7
Earnings from consolidated companies										Earnings from consolidated companies	1,155.0		165.7
Equity in net earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated companies										Equity in net earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated companies	30.7		(7.5)
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests										Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	1,185.7		158.2
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests										Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	3.7		1.5
Net earnings attributable to Mosaic										Net earnings attributable to Mosaic	$	1,182.0	$	156.7
Basic net earnings per share attributable to Mosaic										Basic net earnings per share attributable to Mosaic	$	3.23	$	0.41
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	379.8		379.1		379.5		378.9		Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	366.1		379.2
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic		$	1.14	$	0.12	$	1.55	$	(0.41)
Diluted net earnings per share attributable to Mosaic										Diluted net earnings per share attributable to Mosaic	$	3.19	$	0.41
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	383.3		381.3		383.0		378.9		Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	370.1		382.8

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ~~(LOSS)~~

(In millions)

(Unaudited)

Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, 2021 June 30, 2020 June 30, 2021 June 30, 2020
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interest $ 438.8 $ 45.9 $ 597.0 $ (158.1)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation gain (loss) 297.2 55.3 191.1 (548.1)
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost 1.2 6.0 5.0 7.8
Realized gain on interest rate swap 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.8
Net gain (loss) on marketable securities held in trust fund 3.6 7.9 (14.2) 15.9
Other comprehensive income (loss) 302.5 69.5 182.9 (523.6)
Comprehensive income (loss) 741.3 115.4 779.9 (681.7)
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 4.9 (2.8) 4.1 (11.1)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Mosaic $ 736.4 $ 118.2 $ 775.8 $ (670.6)


	Three months ended
	March 31, 2022		March 31, 2021
Net earnings including noncontrolling interest	$	1,185.7	$	158.2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	305.3		(106.1)
Net actuarial gain and prior service cost	0.4		3.8
Realized gain on interest rate swap	0.5		0.5
Net (loss) on marketable securities held in trust fund	(28.4)		(17.8)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	277.8		(119.6)
Comprehensive income	1,463.5		38.6
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest	8.0		(0.8)
Comprehensive income attributable to Mosaic	$	1,455.5	$	39.4

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


		June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020			March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
											March 31, 2022	December 31, 2021
Assets	Assets					Assets
Current assets:	Current assets:					Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,417.6	$	574.0	Cash and cash equivalents	$	881.9	$	769.5
Receivables, net, including affiliate receivables of $78.2 and $144.8, respectively		930.5		881.1
Receivables, net, including affiliate receivables of $340.6 and $390.1, respectively						Receivables, net, including affiliate receivables of $340.6 and $390.1, respectively	1,530.1		1,531.9
Inventories	Inventories	2,194.4		1,739.2		Inventories	3,326.5		2,741.4

Other current assets	Other current assets	445.1		326.9		Other current assets	486.9		282.5
Total current assets	Total current assets	4,987.6		3,521.2		Total current assets	6,225.4		5,325.3
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $7,968.4 and $8,106.8, respectively		12,062.8		11,854.3
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $8,579.6 and $8,238.1, respectively						Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $8,579.6 and $8,238.1, respectively	12,837.6		12,475.3
Investments in nonconsolidated companies	Investments in nonconsolidated companies	668.7		673.1		Investments in nonconsolidated companies	727.2		691.8
Goodwill	Goodwill	1,201.3		1,173.0		Goodwill	1,196.4		1,172.2
Deferred income taxes	Deferred income taxes	1,169.4		1,179.4		Deferred income taxes	1,012.6		997.1
Other assets	Other assets	1,383.7		1,388.8		Other assets	1,423.9		1,374.7
Total assets	Total assets	$	21,473.5	$	19,789.8	Total assets	$	23,423.1	$	22,036.4
Liabilities and Equity	Liabilities and Equity					Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:	Current liabilities:					Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	Short-term debt	$	0.1	$	0.1	Short-term debt	$	480.5	$	302.8
Current maturities of long-term debt	Current maturities of long-term debt	494.9		504.2		Current maturities of long-term debt	599.7		596.6
Structured accounts payable arrangements	Structured accounts payable arrangements	830.7		640.0		Structured accounts payable arrangements	850.1		743.7
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	924.8		769.1		Accounts payable	848.7		1,260.7
Accrued liabilities	Accrued liabilities	1,887.4		1,233.1		Accrued liabilities	2,272.7		1,883.6

Total current liabilities	Total current liabilities	4,137.9		3,146.5		Total current liabilities	5,051.7		4,787.4
Long-term debt, less current maturities	Long-term debt, less current maturities	3,967.9		4,073.8		Long-term debt, less current maturities	3,377.6		3,382.2
Deferred income taxes	Deferred income taxes	1,073.5		1,060.8		Deferred income taxes	1,070.7		1,016.2
Other noncurrent liabilities	Other noncurrent liabilities	1,778.6		1,753.5		Other noncurrent liabilities	2,132.3		2,102.1
Equity:	Equity:					Equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020		0		0
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 390,776,964 shares issued and 379,894,467 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2021, 389,974,041 shares issued and 379,091,544 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020		3.8		3.8
Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021						Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021	—		—
Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 391,681,516 shares issued and 362,008,984 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2022, 390,815,099 shares issued and 368,732,231 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021						Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 391,681,516 shares issued and 362,008,984 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2022, 390,815,099 shares issued and 368,732,231 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021	3.6		3.7
Capital in excess of par value	Capital in excess of par value	882.6		872.8		Capital in excess of par value	56.6		478.0
Retained earnings	Retained earnings	11,075.9		10,511.0		Retained earnings	13,196.5		12,014.2
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,624.3)		(1,806.2)		Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,618.3)		(1,891.8)
Total Mosaic stockholders' equity	Total Mosaic stockholders' equity	10,338.0		9,581.4		Total Mosaic stockholders' equity	11,638.4		10,604.1
Noncontrolling interests	Noncontrolling interests	177.6		173.8		Noncontrolling interests	152.4		144.4
Total equity	Total equity	10,515.6		9,755.2		Total equity	11,790.8		10,748.5
Total liabilities and equity	Total liabilities and equity	$	21,473.5	$	19,789.8	Total liabilities and equity	$	23,423.1	$	22,036.4

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

(Unaudited)


		Six months ended					Three months ended
		June 30, 2021		June 30, 2020			March 31, 2022		March 31, 2021
											March 31, 2022	March 31, 2021
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:	Cash Flows from Operating Activities:					Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net (loss) earnings including noncontrolling interests		$	597.0	$	(158.1)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests						Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	$	1,185.7	$	158.2
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:						Adjustments to reconcile net earnings including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	Depreciation, depletion and amortization	412.6		433.2		Depreciation, depletion and amortization	226.7		209.1

Deferred and other income taxes	Deferred and other income taxes	38.9		(123.8)		Deferred and other income taxes	130.2		(37.0)
Equity in net loss of nonconsolidated companies, net of dividends		15.1		49.8
Equity in net (earnings) loss of nonconsolidated companies, net of dividends						Equity in net (earnings) loss of nonconsolidated companies, net of dividends	(30.7)		7.5
Accretion expense for asset retirement obligations	Accretion expense for asset retirement obligations	35.1		34.0		Accretion expense for asset retirement obligations	19.6		17.1
Accretion expense for leases	Accretion expense for leases	7.2		13.6		Accretion expense for leases	3.2		3.8
Share-based compensation expense	Share-based compensation expense	19.2		(1.9)		Share-based compensation expense	16.4		14.9

Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives		(45.5)		47.2
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives						Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives	(98.8)		(7.1)
Foreign currency adjustments	Foreign currency adjustments	(116.4)		207.3		Foreign currency adjustments	(318.9)		34.5
Net proceeds from settlement of interest rate swaps		0		34.7
Mine closure costs		158.1		0

Other	Other	(17.1)		10.0		Other	11.8		0.8
Changes in assets and liabilities:	Changes in assets and liabilities:					Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables, net	Receivables, net	(46.4)		42.8		Receivables, net	87.0		(1.5)
Inventories	Inventories	(402.0)		(70.6)		Inventories	(281.6)		(180.7)
Other current and noncurrent assets	Other current and noncurrent assets	(53.1)		55.0		Other current and noncurrent assets	(88.1)		14.0
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	724.0		391.0		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(296.9)		64.6
Other noncurrent liabilities	Other noncurrent liabilities	7.2		39.4		Other noncurrent liabilities	(59.4)		20.6
Net cash provided by operating activities	Net cash provided by operating activities	1,333.9		1,003.6		Net cash provided by operating activities	506.2		318.8
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:	Cash Flows from Investing Activities:					Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	Capital expenditures	(585.8)		(520.7)		Capital expenditures	(290.5)		(288.6)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities - restricted	Purchases of available-for-sale securities - restricted	(200.5)		(348.5)		Purchases of available-for-sale securities - restricted	(57.8)		(123.7)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities - restricted	Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities - restricted	186.1		341.0		Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities - restricted	51.9		110.8

Purchases of held-to-maturity securities	Purchases of held-to-maturity securities	(0.8)		(0.7)		Purchases of held-to-maturity securities	—		(0.8)
Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities	Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities	0.8		0.8		Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities	1.7		0.8
Other	Other	20.6		0.5		Other	(2.5)		(7.0)
Net cash used in investing activities	Net cash used in investing activities	(579.6)		(527.6)		Net cash used in investing activities	(297.2)		(308.5)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:	Cash Flows from Financing Activities:					Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Payments of short-term debt	Payments of short-term debt	(25.0)		(821.5)		Payments of short-term debt	(643.3)		—
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt	Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt	25.0		1,395.0		Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt	814.4		15.0
Payments of structured accounts payable arrangements	Payments of structured accounts payable arrangements	(342.7)		(701.6)		Payments of structured accounts payable arrangements	(462.5)		(161.0)
Proceeds from structured accounts payable arrangements	Proceeds from structured accounts payable arrangements	527.5		365.3		Proceeds from structured accounts payable arrangements	563.6		314.7

Collections of transferred receivables	Collections of transferred receivables	188.7		0		Collections of transferred receivables	446.9		86.6
Payments of transferred receivables	Payments of transferred receivables	(160.6)		0		Payments of transferred receivables	(375.6)		—
Payments of long-term debt	Payments of long-term debt	(128.7)		(31.4)		Payments of long-term debt	(14.1)		(114.5)

Repurchases of stock						Repurchases of stock	(422.1)		—
Cash dividends paid						Cash dividends paid	(40.6)		(18.9)

Cash dividends paid		(47.5)		(37.9)
Other	Other	2.9		(0.3)		Other	8.3		(0.2)
Net cash provided by financing activities		39.6		167.6
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities						Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(125.0)		121.7
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	49.1		(84.3)		Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	31.1		(20.1)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	843.0		559.3		Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	115.1		111.9
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - December 31	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - December 31	594.4		532.3		Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - December 31	786.3		594.4
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - June 30		$	1,437.4	$	1,091.6
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - March 31						Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - March 31	$	901.4	$	706.3

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(In millions)

(Unaudited)


		Six months ended					Three months ended
		June 30, 2021		June 30, 2020			March 31, 2022		March 31, 2021

Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets to the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:	Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets to the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:						Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets to the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,417.6	$	1,073.3	Cash and cash equivalents	$	881.9	$	692.0
Restricted cash in other current assets	Restricted cash in other current assets	10.6		8.5		Restricted cash in other current assets	10.1		10.0
Restricted cash in other assets	Restricted cash in other assets	9.2		9.8		Restricted cash in other assets	9.4		4.3
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows	Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows	$	1,437.4	$	1,091.6	Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of cash flows	$	901.4	$	706.3

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:	Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:					Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:	Cash paid during the period for:					Cash paid during the period for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized of $18.4 and $15.1 for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively)		$	89.6	$	103.3
Interest (net of amount capitalized of $6.4 and $10.2 for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)						Interest (net of amount capitalized of $6.4 and $10.2 for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively)	$	4.2	$	0.6
Income taxes (net of refunds)	Income taxes (net of refunds)	118.9		(21.7)		Income taxes (net of refunds)	258.5		82.7

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(In millions, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


			Mosaic Shareholders														Mosaic Shareholders
		Shares	Dollars													Shares	Dollars
		Common Stock	Common Stock		Capital in Excess of Par Value		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)		Noncontrolling Interests		Total Equity			Common Stock	Common Stock		Capital in Excess of Par Value		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)		Noncontrolling Interests		Total Equity
Balance as of March 31, 2020		379.0	$	3.8	$	847.7	$	9,718.7	$	(2,184.0)	$	173.7	$	8,559.9
Balance as of December 31, 2020															Balance as of December 31, 2020	379.1	$	3.8	$	872.8	$	10,511.0	$	(1,806.2)	$	173.8	$	9,755.2

Total comprehensive income (loss)	Total comprehensive income (loss)	—	—		—		47.4		70.8		(2.8)		115.4		Total comprehensive income (loss)	—	—		—		156.7		(117.3)		(0.8)		38.6
Vesting of restricted stock units	Vesting of restricted stock units	0.1	—		(0.3)		—		—		—		(0.3)		Vesting of restricted stock units	0.6	—		(7.6)		—		—		—		(7.6)
Stock based compensation	Stock based compensation	—	—		8.0		—		—		—		8.0		Stock based compensation	—	—		11.0		—		—		—		11.0

Dividends ($0.05 per share)		—	—		—		(19.1)		—		—		(19.1)

Dividends for noncontrolling interests	Dividends for noncontrolling interests	—	—		—		—		—		(0.2)		(0.2)		Dividends for noncontrolling interests	—	—		—		—		—		(0.2)		(0.2)

Balance as of June 30, 2020		379.1	$	3.8	$	855.4	$	9,747.0	$	(2,113.2)	$	170.7	$	8,663.7
Balance as of March 31, 2021															Balance as of March 31, 2021	379.7	$	3.8	$	876.2	$	10,667.7	$	(1,923.5)	$	172.8	$	9,797.0

Balance as of December 31, 2019		378.8	$	3.8	$	858.4	$	9,921.5	$	(1,598.2)	$	182.1	$	9,367.6

Total comprehensive income (loss)		—	—		—		(155.6)		(515.0)		(11.1)		(681.7)
Vesting of restricted stock units		0.3	—		(2.7)		—		—		—		(2.7)
Stock based compensation		—	—		(0.3)		—		—		—		(0.3)

Dividends ($0.05 per share)		—	—		—		(18.9)		—		—		(18.9)
Dividends for noncontrolling interests		—	—		—		—		—		(0.3)		(0.3)

Balance as of June 30, 2020		379.1	$	3.8	$	855.4	$	9,747.0	$	(2,113.2)	$	170.7	$	8,663.7

Balance as of March 31, 2021		379.7	$	3.8	$	876.2	$	10,667.7	$	(1,923.5)	$	172.8	$	9,797.0

Balance as of December 31, 2021															Balance as of December 31, 2021	368.7	$	3.7	$	478.0	$	12,014.2	$	(1,891.8)	$	144.4	$	10,748.5
Total comprehensive income (loss)	Total comprehensive income (loss)	—	—		—		437.2		299.2		4.9		741.3		Total comprehensive income (loss)	—	—		—		1,182.0		273.5		8.0		1,463.5
Stock option exercises	Stock option exercises	—	—		3.2		—		—		—		3.2		Stock option exercises	—	—		8.3		—		—		—		8.3
Vesting of restricted stock units	Vesting of restricted stock units	0.2	—		(3.3)		—		—		—		(3.3)		Vesting of restricted stock units	0.9	—		(19.5)		—		—		—		(19.5)
Stock based compensation	Stock based compensation	—	—		6.5		—		—		—		6.5		Stock based compensation	—	—		11.8		—		—		—		11.8
Share repurchases															Share repurchases	(7.6)	(0.1)		(422.0)		—		—		—		(422.1)
Dividends															Dividends	—	—		—		0.3		—		—		0.3

Dividends ($0.075 per share)		—	—		—		(29.0)		—		—		(29.0)
Dividends for noncontrolling interests		—	—		—		—		—		(0.1)		(0.1)

Balance as of June 30, 2021		379.9	$	3.8	$	882.6	$	11,075.9	$	(1,624.3)	$	177.6	$	10,515.6
Balance as of March 31, 2022															Balance as of March 31, 2022	362.0	$	3.6	$	56.6	$	13,196.5	$	(1,618.3)	$	152.4	$	11,790.8

Balance as of December 31, 2020		379.1	$	3.8	$	872.8	$	10,511.0	$	(1,806.2)	$	173.8	$	9,755.2
Total comprehensive income (loss)		—	—		—		593.9		181.9		4.1		779.9
Stock option exercises			—		3.2		—		—		—		3.2
Vesting of restricted stock units		0.8	—		(10.9)		—		—		—		(10.9)
Stock based compensation		—	—		17.5		—		—		—		17.5

Dividends ($0.075 per share)		—	—		—		(29.0)		—		—		(29.0)
Dividends for noncontrolling interests		—	—		—		—		—		(0.3)		(0.3)

Balance as of June 30, 2021		379.9	$	3.8	$	882.6	$	11,075.9	$	(1,624.3)	$	177.6	$	10,515.6

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Table of Contents

THE MOSAIC COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tables in millions, except per share amounts and as otherwise designated)

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Nature of Business

The Mosaic Company (“Mosaic,” and, with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) produces and markets concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients. We conduct our business through wholly and majority owned subsidiaries and businesses in which we own less than a majority or a non-controlling interest, including consolidated variable interest entities and investments accounted for by the equity method.

We are organized into the following business segments:

•Our ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate business segment owns and operates mines and production facilities in Florida which produce concentrated phosphate crop nutrients and phosphate-based animal feed ingredients, and processing plants in Louisiana which produce concentrated phosphate crop nutrients. The ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment includes our 75% interest in the Miski Mayo Phosphate Mine in Peru. These results are consolidated in the ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment. The ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment also includes our 25% interest in the Ma’aden Wa’ad Al Shamal Phosphate Company ~~(the “~~(“MWSPC”), a joint venture to develop, own and operate integrated phosphate production facilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We market approximately 25% of ~~the~~ MWSPC phosphate production. We recognize our equity in the net earnings or losses relating to MWSPC on a one-quarter lag in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Earnings (Loss).~~Earnings.

•Our Potash business segment owns and operates potash mines and production facilities in Canada and the U.S. which produce potash-based crop nutrients, animal feed ingredients and industrial products. Potash sales include domestic and international sales. We are a member of Canpotex, Limited (“Canpotex”), an export association of Canadian potash producers through which we sell our Canadian potash outside the U.S. and Canada.

•Our Mosaic Fertilizantes business segment includes the assets in Brazil that we acquired in the 2018 acquisition (the “Acquisition”) of Vale Fertilizantes S.A. (now known as Mosaic Fertilizantes P&K S.A. or the “Acquired Business”), which consist of five phosphate rock mines, four phosphate chemical plants and a potash mine. The segment also includes our legacy distribution business in South America, which consists of sales offices, crop nutrient blending and bagging facilities, port terminals and warehouses in Brazil and Paraguay. We also have a majority interest in Fospar S.A., which owns and operates a single superphosphate granulation plant and a deep-water crop nutrition port and throughput warehouse terminal facility in Brazil.

Intersegment eliminations, unrealized mark-to-market gains/losses on derivatives, debt expenses, Streamsong Resort® results of operations, and the results of the China and India distribution businesses are included within Corporate, Eliminations and Other.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Statement Presentation and Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Mosaic have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. As permitted under these rules, certain footnotes and other financial information that are normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) can be condensed or omitted. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this document reflect, in the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The following notes should be read in conjunction with the accounting policies and other disclosures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 (the “10-K Report”). Sales, expenses, cash flows, assets and liabilities can and do vary during the year as a result of seasonality and other factors. Therefore, interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Mosaic, its majority-owned subsidiaries, and certain variable interest entities in which Mosaic is the primary beneficiary. Certain investments in companies where we do not have control but have the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for by the equity method.

Accounting Estimates

Preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting periods. The most significant estimates made by management relate to the estimates of fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, the recoverability of non-current assets including goodwill, the useful lives and net realizable values of long-lived assets, environmental and reclamation liabilities, including asset retirement obligations (“ARO”), and income tax-related accounts, including the valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets. Actual results could differ from these estimates.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

3. Other Financial Statement Data

The following provides additional information concerning selected balance sheet accounts:


		June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020			March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
											March 31, 2022	December 31, 2021
Other current assets	Other current assets					Other current assets
Income and other taxes receivable	Income and other taxes receivable	$	217.9	$	181.4	Income and other taxes receivable	$	185.6	$	126.1
Prepaid expenses	Prepaid expenses	107.9		80.4		Prepaid expenses	163.5		107.3
Other	Other	119.3		65.1		Other	137.8		49.1
		$	445.1	$	326.9		$	486.9	$	282.5

Other assets	Other assets					Other assets
Restricted cash	Restricted cash	$	10.6	$	12.3	Restricted cash	$	9.4	$	8.5
MRO inventory	MRO inventory	133.8		137.7		MRO inventory	148.7		144.7
Marketable securities held in trust	Marketable securities held in trust	733.9		734.3		Marketable securities held in trust	695.8		731.5
Operating lease right-of-use assets	Operating lease right-of-use assets	147.8		173.1		Operating lease right-of-use assets	154.8		120.2
Indemnification asset	Indemnification asset	22.2		23.0		Indemnification asset	24.9		21.0
Long-term receivable	Long-term receivable	51.3		52.6		Long-term receivable	46.4		41.5
Other	Other	284.1		255.8		Other	343.9		307.3
		$	1,383.7	$	1,388.8		$	1,423.9	$	1,374.7

Accrued liabilities	Accrued liabilities					Accrued liabilities

Accrued dividends						Accrued dividends	$	1.9	$	43.6
Payroll and employee benefits	Payroll and employee benefits	$	186.0	$	195.5	Payroll and employee benefits	169.0		235.9
Asset retirement obligations	Asset retirement obligations	174.8		190.2		Asset retirement obligations	218.0		222.4
Receivable factoring liability		28.1		0

Customer prepayments (a)	Customer prepayments (a)	881.4		287.6		Customer prepayments (a)	818.4		437.7
Accrued income and other taxes	Accrued income and other taxes	91.4		83.1		Accrued income and other taxes	250.4		184.3
Operating lease obligation	Operating lease obligation	62.9		64.0		Operating lease obligation	56.1		59.7
Servicing liability						Servicing liability	152.4		81.1
Other	Other	462.8		412.7		Other	606.5		618.9
		$	1,887.4	$	1,233.1		$	2,272.7	$	1,883.6

Other noncurrent liabilities	Other noncurrent liabilities					Other noncurrent liabilities
Asset retirement obligations	Asset retirement obligations	$	1,244.6	$	1,203.7	Asset retirement obligations	$	1,553.4	$	1,526.9
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits						Accrued pension and postretirement benefits	127.9		64.3
Operating lease obligation	Operating lease obligation	88.0		109.6		Operating lease obligation	101.6		114.4
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits		164.7		158.5
Unrecognized tax benefits	Unrecognized tax benefits	42.9		46.4		Unrecognized tax benefits	29.6		156.6
Other	Other	238.4		235.3		Other	319.8		239.9
		$	1,778.6	$	1,753.5		$	2,132.3	$	2,102.1

(a) The timing of recognition of revenue related to our performance obligations may be different than the timing of collection of cash related to those performance obligations. Specifically, we collect prepayments from certain customers in Brazil. In addition, cash collection from ~~Canpotex may occur prior to delivery of product to the end customer. We generally satisfy our contractual liabilities within one quarter of incurring the liability.~~


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Canpotex may occur prior to delivery of product to the end customer. We generally satisfy our contractual liabilities within one quarter of incurring the liability.

4. Earnings Per Share

The numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) is net earnings attributable to Mosaic. The denominator for basic EPS is the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The denominator for diluted EPS also includes the weighted average number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued, unless the shares are anti-dilutive.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for the basic and diluted EPS computations:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2021 2020 2021 2020
Net income (loss) attributable to Mosaic $ 437.2 $ 47.4 $ 593.9 $ (155.6)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding 379.8 379.1 379.5 378.9
Dilutive impact of share-based awards 3.5 2.2 3.5 0
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding 383.3 381.3 383.0 378.9
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic $ 1.15 $ 0.13 $ 1.56 $ (0.41)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic $ 1.14 $ 0.12 $ 1.55 $ (0.41)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
Net income attributable to Mosaic	$	1,182.0	$	156.7
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	366.1		379.2
Dilutive impact of share-based awards	4.0		3.6
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	370.1		382.8
Basic net income per share attributable to Mosaic	$	3.23	$	0.41
Diluted net income per share attributable to Mosaic	$	3.19	$	0.41

A total of ~~0.5~~0.4 million and 0.7 million shares of common stock subject to issuance related to share-based awards for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, ~~and 3.4 million and 3.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020,~~ respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

5. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:


		June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020			March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
											March 31, 2022	December 31, 2021
Raw materials	Raw materials	$	193.0	$	92.1	Raw materials	$	373.7	$	296.6
Work in process	Work in process	698.8		634.5		Work in process	749.6		741.1
Finished goods	Finished goods	1,136.7		868.2		Finished goods	2,001.6		1,534.3
Final price deferred(a)	Final price deferred(a)	23.9		23.0		Final price deferred(a)	47.4		31.4
Operating materials and supplies	Operating materials and supplies	142.0		121.4		Operating materials and supplies	154.2		138.0
		$	2,194.4	$	1,739.2		$	3,326.5	$	2,741.4

(a)Final price deferred is product that has shipped to customers, but the price has not yet been agreed upon.

6. Goodwill

Mosaic had goodwill of $1.2 billion as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. We review goodwill for impairment annually in October and at any time events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

~~6. Goodwill~~

Mosaic had goodwill of $1.2 billion as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. We review goodwill for impairment annually in October and at any time events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully recoverable, which is based on our accounting policy and GAAP. The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by reporting unit, are as follows:

Potash Mosaic Fertilizantes Corporate, Eliminations and Other Total
Balance as of December 31, 2020 $ 1,063.2 $ 97.7 $ 12.1 $ 1,173.0
Foreign currency translation 27.3 1.0 0 28.3
Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ 1,090.5 $ 98.7 $ 12.1 $ 1,201.3


	Potash		Mosaic Fertilizantes		Corporate, Eliminations and Other		Total



Balance as of December 31, 2021	$	1,064.2	$	95.9	$	12.1	$	1,172.2
Foreign currency translation	19.9		4.3		—		24.2




Balance as of March 31, 2022	$	1,084.1	$	100.2	$	12.1	$	1,196.4

We are required to perform our next annual goodwill impairment analysis as of October 31, ~~2021.~~2022. It is possible that future business conditions could deteriorate from the current state, raw material or product price projections could decline significantly from current estimates, or our common stock price could decline significantly. If our net sales and cash flow projections are not achieved or our common stock price significantly declines from current levels, book values of certain operations could exceed their fair values, which may result in goodwill impairment charges in future periods. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material.

7. Marketable Securities Held in Trusts

In August 2016, Mosaic deposited $630 million into two trust funds (together, the “RCRA Trusts”) created to provide additional financial assurance in the form of cash for the estimated costs (“Gypstack Closure Costs”) of closure and long term care of our Florida and Louisiana phosphogypsum management systems (“Gypstacks”), as described further in Note 910 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Our actual Gypstack Closure Costs are generally expected to be paid by us in the normal course of our Phosphate business; however, funds held in each of the RCRA Trusts can be drawn by the applicable governmental authority in the event we cannot perform our closure and long term care obligations. When our estimated Gypstack Closure Costs with respect to the facilities associated with a RCRA Trust are sufficiently lower than the amount on deposit in that RCRA Trust, we have the right to request that the excess funds be released to us. The same is true for the RCRA Trust balance remaining after the completion of our obligations, which will be performed over a period that may not end until 3 decades or more after a Gypstack has been closed. The investments held by the RCRA Trusts are managed by independent investment managers with discretion to buy, sell, and invest pursuant to the objectives and standards set forth in the related trust agreements. Amounts reserved to be held or held in the RCRA Trusts (including losses or reinvested earnings) are included in other assets on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The RCRA Trusts hold investments, which are restricted from our general use, in marketable debt securities classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. As a result, unrealized gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income until realized, unless it is determined that the ~~carrying value~~entire unamortized cost basis of anthe investment is ~~impaired~~not expected to be recovered. A credit loss would then be recognized in operations for the amount of the expected credit loss. As of March 31, 2022, we expect to recover our amortized cost on all available-for-sale securities and have not established an ~~other-than-temporary basis.~~allowance for credit loss.

We review the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the ability to observe valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy. We determine the fair market values of our available-for-sale securities and certain other assets based on the fair value hierarchy described below:

Level 1: Values based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Values based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Level 3: Values generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

~~There were 0 other-than-temporary impairment write-downs on available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2021.~~

The estimated fair value of the investments in the RCRA Trusts as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021 are as follows:


		June 30, 2021									March 31, 2022
		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value			Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Level 1	Level 1									Level 1
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	7.9	$	0	$	0	$	7.9	Cash and cash equivalents	$	7.1	$	—	$	—	$	7.1
Level 2	Level 2									Level 2
Corporate debt securities	Corporate debt securities	198.6		9.2		(0.2)		207.6		Corporate debt securities	198.6		0.8		(7.3)		192.1
Municipal bonds	Municipal bonds	197.2		8.1		(0.4)		204.9		Municipal bonds	201.0		0.9		(5.8)		196.1
U.S. government bonds	U.S. government bonds	302.2		0.5		(4.5)		298.2		U.S. government bonds	306.2		—		(21.6)		284.6
Total	Total	$	705.9	$	17.8	$	(5.1)	$	718.6	Total	$	712.9	$	1.7	$	(34.7)	$	679.9

		December 31, 2020									December 31, 2021
		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value			Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Level 1	Level 1									Level 1
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	11.8	$	0	$	0	$	11.8	Cash and cash equivalents	$	8.1	$	—	$	—	$	8.1
Level 2	Level 2									Level 2
Corporate debt securities	Corporate debt securities	193.3		14.0		0		207.3		Corporate debt securities	198.8		5.6		(0.9)		203.5
Municipal bonds	Municipal bonds	190.5		8.8		(0.3)		199.0		Municipal bonds	198.1		6.5		(0.5)		204.1
U.S. government bonds	U.S. government bonds	300.7		4.7		(0.1)		305.3		U.S. government bonds	305.3		—		(6.1)		299.2
Total	Total	$	696.3	$	27.5	$	(0.4)	$	723.4	Total	$	710.3	$	12.1	$	(7.5)	$	714.9


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

The following tables show gross unrealized losses and fair values of the RCRA Trusts’ available-for-sale securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position ~~deemed to be temporary~~for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021:

June 30, 2021 December 31, 2020
(in millions) Fair
Value Gross
Unrealized
Losses Fair
Value Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Securities that have been in a continuous loss position for less than 12 months:
Corporate debt securities $ 23.5 $ (0.2) $ 1.5 $ 0
Municipal bonds 25.0 (0.3) 16.0 (0.2)
U.S. government bonds 265.0 (4.5) 120.3 (0.1)
$ 313.5 $ (5.0) $ 137.8 $ (0.3)
Securities that have been in a continuous loss position for more than 12 months:
Corporate debt securities $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Municipal bonds 7.0 (0.1) 4.6 (0.1)
U.S. government bonds 0 0 0 0
$ 7.0 $ (0.1) $ 4.6 $ (0.1)


	March 31, 2022				December 31, 2021
(in millions)	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
Securities that have been in a continuous loss position for less than 12 months:
Corporate debt securities	$	143.8	$	(6.6)	$	67.1	$	(0.8)
Municipal bonds	127.2		(5.0)		39.9		(0.4)
U.S. government bonds	116.5		(8.3)		152.2		(2.5)
	$	387.5	$	(19.9)	$	259.2	$	(3.7)
Securities that have been in a continuous loss position for more than 12 months:


Corporate debt securities	$	6.5	$	(0.7)	$	3.6	$	(0.1)
Municipal bonds	10.3		(0.8)		4.5		(0.1)
U.S. government bonds	165.7		(13.3)		143.4		(3.6)
	$	182.5	$	(14.8)	$	151.5	$	(3.8)

The following table summarizes the balance by contractual maturity of the available-for-sale debt securities invested by the RCRA Trusts as of ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations before the underlying contracts mature.


	~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022
Due in one year or less	$	~~30.1~~17.7
Due after one year through five years	~~308.6~~348.4
Due after five years through ten years	~~331.3~~280.7
Due after ten years	~~40.7~~26.0
Total debt securities	$	~~710.7~~672.8

For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022, realized gains were $0.8 million and there were no realized losses. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, realized gains were ~~$1.5~~$2.9 million ~~and $4.4 million, respectively,~~ and realized losses were $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, realized gains were $5.7 million and $9.4 million, respectively, and realized losses were $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively.$0.3 million.

8. Financing Arrangements

~~Structured Accounts Payable Arrangements~~Inventory Financing Arrangement

~~In Brazil,~~We have an inventory financing arrangement whereby we ~~finance some~~can sell up to $625 million of ~~our potash-based fertilizer, sulfur, ammonia~~certain inventory for cash and ~~other raw material product purchases through third-party financing arrangements. These arrangements provide that~~subsequently repurchase the ~~third-party intermediary advance~~inventory at an agreed upon price and time in the ~~amount~~future, not to exceed 180 days. Under the terms of the ~~scheduled payment~~agreement, we may borrow up to 90% of the ~~vendor, less an appropriate discount,~~value of the inventory. It is later repurchased by Mosaic at ~~a scheduled payment date~~the original sale price plus interest and ~~Mosaic makes payment to the third-party intermediary at a later date, stipulated in accordance with the commercial terms negotiated.~~any transaction costs. As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020, the total structured accounts payable arrangements were $830.7~~2021, $452.8 million and ~~$640.0~~$302.7 million, ~~respectively.~~respectively, of inventory was financed under this arrangement, which is included in short-term debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Receivable Purchasing Arrangement

~~On March 4, 2020, we entered into~~We finance certain accounts receivable through a Receivable Purchasing Agreement (“RPA”), with a bank whereby, from time-to-time, we sell ~~certain~~the receivables. The net face value of the purchased receivables may not exceed ~~$150~~$400 million at any point in time. The purchase price of the receivable sold under the RPA is the face value of the receivable less an agreed upon discount. ~~As of December 31, 2020, there was no outstanding balance under this facility. In January 2021, we entered into a First Amendment to the RPA. This amendment made certain adjustments so that the~~The receivables sold under the RPA ~~will be~~are accounted for as a true sale. Upon sale, these receivables are removed from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash received is presented as cash provided by operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. ~~Prior to the amendment, we recorded the purchase price as short-term debt, and recognized interest expense by accreting the liability through the due date of the underlying receivables.~~

During the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, ~~and June 30, 2020,~~ the Company sold approximately ~~$102.1~~$549.3 million, and ~~$188.7 million, and $99.9 million and $201.4~~$86.6 million, respectively, of accounts receivable under this arrangement. Discounts on sold receivables were not material for any period presented. Following the sale to the bank, we continue to service the collection of the receivable on behalf of the bank without further consideration. As of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 ~~$28.1~~, $152.4 million and $81.1 million, respectively, had been collected but not yet remitted to the bank. This amount is classified in accrued liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collected and remitted are presented as financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Structured Accounts Payable Arrangements

In Brazil, we finance some of our potash-based fertilizer, sulfur, ammonia and other raw material product purchases through third-party contractual arrangements. These arrangements provide that the third-party intermediary advance the amount of the scheduled payment to the vendor, less an appropriate discount, at a scheduled payment date. Mosaic then makes payment to the third-party intermediary at a later date, stipulated in accordance with the commercial terms negotiated. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the total structured accounts payable arrangements were $850.1 million and $743.7 million, respectively.

9. Asset Retirement Obligations

We recognize our estimated AROs in the period in which we have an existing legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset, and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The ARO is recognized at fair value when the liability is incurred with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. We depreciate the tangible asset over its estimated useful life. The liability is adjusted in subsequent periods through accretion expense, which represents the increase in the present value of the liability due to the passage of time. Such depreciation and accretion expenses are included in cost of goods sold for operating facilities and other operating expense for indefinitely closed facilities.

Our legal obligations related to asset retirement require us to: (i) reclaim lands disturbed by mining as a condition to receive permits to mine phosphate ore reserves; (ii) treat low pH process water in Gypstacks to neutralize acidity; (iii) close and monitor Gypstacks at our Florida and Louisiana facilities at the end of their useful lives; (iv) remediate certain other conditional obligations; (v) remove all surface structures and equipment, plug and abandon mine shafts, contour and revegetate, as necessary, and monitor for five years after closing our Carlsbad, New Mexico facility; (vi) decommission facilities, manage tailings and execute site reclamation at our Saskatchewan potash mines at the end of their useful lives; (vii) de-commission mines in Brazil and ~~Peru acquired as part of the Acquisition~~Peru; and (viii) decommission plant sites and close Gypstacks in ~~Brazil, also as part of the Acquisition.~~Brazil. The estimated liability for these legal obligations is based on the estimated cost to satisfy the above obligations, which is discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

A reconciliation of our AROs is as follows:


(in millions)	(in millions)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		(in millions)	March 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
AROs, beginning of period	AROs, beginning of period	$	1,393.9	$	1,315.2	AROs, beginning of period	$	1,749.3	$	1,393.9
Liabilities incurred	Liabilities incurred	9.5		10.8		Liabilities incurred	4.6		20.2
Liabilities settled	Liabilities settled	(78.7)		(125.1)		Liabilities settled	(54.1)		(163.1)
Accretion expense	Accretion expense	35.1		68.0		Accretion expense	19.6		71.9
Revisions in estimated cash flows	Revisions in estimated cash flows	50.4		167.3		Revisions in estimated cash flows	12.1		443.3
Foreign currency translation	Foreign currency translation	9.2		(42.3)		Foreign currency translation	39.9		(16.9)
AROs, end of period	AROs, end of period	1,419.4		1,393.9		AROs, end of period	1,771.4		1,749.3
Less current portion	Less current portion	174.8		190.2		Less current portion	218.0		222.4
Non-current portion of AROs	Non-current portion of AROs	$	1,244.6	$	1,203.7	Non-current portion of AROs	$	1,553.4	$	1,526.9

North America Gypstack Closure Costs

A majority of our ARO relates to Gypstack Closure Costs in Florida and Louisiana. For financial reporting purposes, we recognize our estimated Gypstack Closure Costs at their present value. This present value determined for financial reporting purposes is reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets in accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities.

As discussed below, we have arrangements to provide financial assurance for the estimated Gypstack Closure Costs associated with our facilities in Florida and Louisiana.

EPA RCRA Initiative. On September 30, 2015, we and our subsidiary, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (“Mosaic Fertilizer”), reached agreements with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (“FDEP”) and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality on the terms of 2 consent decrees (collectively, the “2015 Consent Decrees”) to resolve claims relating to our management of certain waste materials onsite at our Riverview, New Wales, Mulberry, Green Bay, South Pierce and Bartow fertilizer manufacturing facilities in Florida and our Faustina and Uncle Sam facilities in Louisiana. This followed a 2003 announcement by the EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance that it would be targeting facilities in mineral processing industries, including phosphoric acid producers, for a thorough review under the U.S. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and related state laws. As discussed below, a separate consent decree was previously entered into with EPA and the FDEP with respect to RCRA compliance at the Plant City, Florida phosphate concentrates facility (the “Plant City Facility”) that we acquired as part of our acquisition (the “CF Phosphate Assets Acquisition”) of the Florida phosphate assets and assumption of certain related liabilities of CF Industries, Inc. (“CF”).

The remaining monetary obligations under the 2015 Consent Decrees include:

• Modification of certain operating practices and undertaking certain capital improvement projects over a period of several years that are expected to result in remaining capital expenditures likely to exceed $20 million in the aggregate.

• Provision of additional financial assurance for the estimated Gypstack Closure Costs for Gypstacks at the covered facilities. The RCRA Trusts are discussed in Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, we have agreed to guarantee the difference between the amounts held in each RCRA Trust (including any earnings) and the estimated closure and long-term care costs.

As of December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the undiscounted amount of our Gypstack Closure Costs ARO associated with the facilities covered by the 2015 Consent Decrees, determined using the assumptions used for financial reporting purposes, was approximately ~~$1.6~~$1.8 billion, and the present value of our Gypstack Closure Costs ARO reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheet for those facilities was approximately ~~$439.1~~$603 million.

Plant City and Bonnie Facilities. As part of the CF Phosphate Assets Acquisition, we assumed certain AROs related to Gypstack Closure Costs at both the Plant City Facility and a closed Florida phosphate concentrates facility in Bartow, Florida


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(the “Bonnie Facility”) that we acquired. Associated with these assets are two related financial assurance arrangements for which we became responsible and that provided sources of funds for the estimated Gypstack Closure Costs for these facilities. Pursuant to federal or state laws, the applicable government entities are permitted to draw against such amounts in the event we cannot perform such closure activities. One of the financial assurance arrangements was initially a trust (the “Plant City Trust”) established to meet the requirements under a consent decree with the EPA and the FDEP with respect to RCRA compliance at Plant City. The Plant City Trust also satisfied Florida financial assurance requirements at that site. Beginning in September 2016, as a substitute for the financial assurance provided through the Plant City Trust, we have provided financial assurance for the Plant City Facility in the form of a surety bond (the “Plant City Bond”). The amount of the Plant City Bond is ~~$243.2~~$249.7 million, which reflects our closure cost estimates as of December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The other financial assurance arrangement was also a trust fund (the “Bonnie Facility Trust”) established to meet the requirements under Florida financial assurance regulations that apply to the Bonnie Facility. In July 2018, we received $21.0 million from the Bonnie Facility Trust by substituting for the trust fund a financial test mechanism (“Bonnie Financial Test”) supported by a corporate guarantee as allowed by state regulations. Both financial assurance funding obligations require estimates of future expenditures that could be impacted by refinements in scope, technological developments, new information, cost inflation, changes in regulations, discount rates and the timing of activities. Under our current approach to satisfying applicable requirements, additional financial assurance would be required in the future if increases in cost estimates exceed the face amount of the Plant City Bond or the amount supported by the Bonnie Financial Test.

As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the aggregate amounts of AROs associated with the combined Plant City Facility and Bonnie Facility Gypstack closure costs included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were ~~$246.1~~$249.7 million and ~~$251.8~~$262.9 million, respectively. The aggregate amount represented by the Plant City Bond exceeds the present value of the aggregate amount of ARO associated with that facility. This is because the amount of financial assurance we are required to provide represents the aggregate undiscounted estimated amount to be paid by us in the normal course of our ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate business over a period that may not end until 3 decades or more after the Gypstack has been closed, whereas the ARO included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects the discounted present value of those estimated amounts.

10. Income Taxes

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, gross unrecognized tax benefits decreased by ~~$4.2~~$100.4 million to ~~$32.6~~$24.2 million. The decrease is primarily related to ~~recording non-U.S. reserves and foreign exchange.~~the effective settlement of unrecognized tax benefits during the quarter. If recognized, approximately ~~$27.8~~$23.8 million of the ~~$32.6~~$24.2 million in unrecognized tax benefits would affect our effective tax rate and net earnings in future periods.

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of our income tax provision. We had accrued interest and penalties totaling ~~$9.0~~$4.4 million and $31.1 million as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, that were included in other noncurrent liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounting for uncertain tax positions is determined by prescribing the minimum probability threshold that a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained based on the technical merits of the position. Mosaic is continually under audit by various tax authorities in the normal course of business. Such tax authorities may raise issues contrary to positions taken by the Company. If such positions are ultimately not sustained by the Company, this could result in material assessments to the Company. The costs related to defending, if needed, such positions on appeal or in court may be material. The Company ~~is currently in negotiations with non-U.S. tax authorities where settlements could result in different tax outcomes than what is currently accounted for. The Company~~ believes that any issues raised have been properly accounted ~~for.~~for in its current financial statements.

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, tax expense ~~specific to the period~~ was a benefit of approximately ~~$49.6~~$9.0 million. This consisted primarily of a share-based excess benefit, relates to various items including $42.7 million related to the pretax Esterhazy mine closure costs, $3.1 million related to prior year adjustments, $2.8 million related to prior year non-U.S. reserves,which was partially offset by changes in valuation allowances and other miscellaneous ~~costs of $1.0 million.~~benefits. In addition to items specific to the period, our income tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings across the jurisdictions in which we operate, by a benefit associated with depletion, by a benefit associated with non-U.S. incentives, by changes in valuation allowances and by the impact of certain entities being taxed in both their foreign jurisdiction and the U.S., including foreign tax credits for various taxes incurred.

Generally, for interim periods, income tax is equal to the total of (1) year-to-date pretax income multiplied by our forecasted effective tax rate plus (2) tax expense items specific to the period. In situations where we expect to report losses for which we do not expect to receive tax benefits, we are required to apply separate forecasted effective tax rates to those jurisdictions rather


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

than including them in the consolidated effective tax rate. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, income tax expense was not impacted by this set of rules.

For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2021, discrete tax expense ~~specific to the period~~ was a benefit of approximately ~~$45.2~~$4.4 million. This ~~relates to various items including benefits for the following items: $42.7 million~~consisted primarily of tax cost related to ~~the pretax Esterhazy mine closure costs, $1.1 million related to~~non-U.S. prior year adjustments, $2.8 million recorded related to prior year non-U.S. reserves, and other miscellaneous benefits of $0.6 million. These tax benefits are partially offset by tax expense of $2.0 million related to the write-off of expired stock ~~options.~~options, and other miscellaneous costs. In addition to items specific to the period, our income tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings across the jurisdictions in which we operate, by a benefit associated with depletion, by a benefit associated with non-U.S. incentives, by changes in valuation allowances and by the impact of certain entities being taxed in both their foreign ~~jurisdictions~~jurisdiction and the U.S., including foreign tax credits for various taxes incurred.

11. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We periodically enter into derivatives to mitigate our exposure to foreign currency risks, interest rate movements and the effects of changing commodity prices. We record all derivatives on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The fair value of these instruments is determined by using quoted market prices, third-party comparables, or internal estimates. We net our derivative asset and liability positions when we have a master netting arrangement in place. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency, commodity and freight derivatives are immediately recognized in earnings.

We do not apply hedge accounting treatments to our foreign currency exchange contracts, commodities contracts, or freight contracts. Unrealized gains and (losses) on foreign currency exchange contracts used to hedge cash flows related to the production of our products are included in cost of goods sold in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Unrealized gains and (losses) on commodities contracts and certain forward freight agreements are also recorded in cost of goods sold in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Unrealized gains or (losses) on foreign currency exchange contracts used to hedge cash flows that are not related to the production of our products are included in the foreign currency transaction gain/(loss) caption in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

From time to time, we enter into fixed-to-floating interest rate contracts. We apply fair value hedge accounting treatment to these contracts. Under these arrangements, we agree to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. The mark-to-market of these fair value hedges is recorded as gains or losses in interest expense. We had 0 fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements in effect as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the gross asset position of our derivative instruments was ~~$115.5~~$144.2 million and ~~$65.3~~$45.3 million, respectively, and the gross liability position of our liability instruments was ~~$58.4~~$47.9 million and ~~$49.9~~$45.5 million, respectively.

As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the following is the total absolute notional volume associated with our outstanding derivative instruments:

(in millions of Units)

June 30, 2021

December 31, 2020

(in millions of Units)

March 31, 2022

December 31, 2021

Derivative Instrument

Derivative Category

Unit of Measure

Derivative Instrument

Derivative Category

Unit of Measure

Foreign currency derivatives

Foreign currency

US Dollars

3,264.5

2,912.3

Foreign currency derivatives

Foreign currency

US Dollars

3,215.4

3,185.8

Natural gas derivatives

Commodity

MMbtu

29.1

27.3

Natural gas derivatives

Commodity

MMbtu

20.8

23.6

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features

Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that are governed by International Swap and Derivatives Association agreements with the counterparties. These agreements contain provisions that allow us to settle for the net amount between payments and receipts, and also state that if our debt were to be rated below investment grade, certain counterparties could request full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, was ~~$7.2~~$13.3 million and ~~$11.3~~$8.6 million, respectively. We have no cash collateral posted in association with these contracts. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements were triggered on ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we would have been


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

required to post an additional ~~$0.5~~$1.8 million of collateral assets, which are either cash or U.S. Treasury instruments, to the counterparties.

Counterparty Credit Risk

We enter into foreign exchange, certain commodity and interest rate derivatives, primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties. We continually monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. While we may be exposed to potential losses due to the credit risk of non-performance by these counterparties, material losses are not anticipated. We closely monitor the credit risk associated with our counterparties and customers and to date have not experienced material losses.

12. Fair Value Measurements

Following is a summary of the valuation techniques for assets and liabilities recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value on a recurring basis:

Foreign Currency Derivatives - The foreign currency derivative instruments that we currently use are forward contracts and zero-cost collars, which typically expire within eighteen months. Most of the valuations are adjusted by a forward yield curve or interest rates. In such cases, these derivative contracts are classified within Level 2. Some valuations are based on exchange-quoted prices, which are classified as Level 1. Changes in the fair market values of these contracts are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of cost of goods sold in our Corporate, Eliminations and Other segment, or foreign currency transaction (gain) loss. As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the gross asset position of our foreign currency derivative instruments was ~~$96.1~~$103.2 million and ~~$58.6~~$27.0 million, respectively, and the gross liability position of our foreign currency derivative instruments was ~~$58.4~~$47.9 million and ~~$48.7~~$45.4 million, respectively.

Commodity Derivatives - The commodity contracts primarily relate to natural gas. The commodity derivative instruments that we currently use are forward purchase contracts, swaps, and three-way collars. The natural gas contracts settle using NYMEX futures or AECO price indexes, which represent fair value at any given time. The contracts’ maturities and settlements are scheduled for future months and settlements are scheduled to coincide with anticipated gas purchases during those future periods. Quoted market prices from NYMEX and AECO are used to determine the fair value of these instruments. These market prices are adjusted by a forward yield curve and are classified within Level 2. Changes in the fair market values of these contracts are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of cost of goods sold in our Corporate, Eliminations and Other segment. As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the gross asset position of our commodity derivative instruments was ~~$19.4~~$41.0 million and ~~$6.7~~$18.3 million, respectively, and the gross liability position of our commodity instruments was 0zero and ~~$1.2~~$0.1 million, respectively.

Interest Rate Derivatives - We manage interest expense through interest rate contracts to convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt into floating-rate debt. From time to time, we also enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge our exposure to changes in future interest rates related to anticipated debt issuances. Valuations are based on external pricing sources and are classified as Level 2. Changes in the fair market values of these contracts are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of interest expense. ~~In April 2020, we terminated our outstanding~~We did not hold any interest rate ~~swap contracts which resulted in an immaterial impact to~~derivative positions as of March 31, 2022.

Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our ~~Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings (Loss).~~

financial instruments are as follows:


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

~~Financial Instruments~~

~~The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:~~


		June 30, 2021				December 31, 2020					March 31, 2022				December 31, 2021
		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
																			Carrying Amount	Fair Value	Carrying Amount	Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,417.6	$	1,417.6	$	574.0	$	574.0	Cash and cash equivalents	$	881.9	$	881.9	$	769.5	$	769.5
Accounts receivable	Accounts receivable	930.5		930.5		881.1		881.1		Accounts receivable	1,530.1		1,530.1		1,531.9		1,531.9
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	924.8		924.8		769.1		769.1		Accounts payable	848.7		848.7		1,260.7		1,260.7
Structured accounts payable arrangements	Structured accounts payable arrangements	830.7		830.7		640.0		640.0		Structured accounts payable arrangements	850.1		850.1		743.7		743.7
Short-term debt	Short-term debt	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1		Short-term debt	480.5		480.5		302.8		302.8
Long-term debt, including current portion	Long-term debt, including current portion	4,462.8		5,033.2		4,578.0		5,172.1		Long-term debt, including current portion	3,977.3		4,261.0		3,978.8		4,516.1

For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, accounts payable, structured accounts payable arrangements, and short-term debt, the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The fair value of long-term debt, including the current portion, is estimated using quoted market prices for the publicly registered notes and debentures, classified as Level 1 and Level 2, respectively, within the fair value hierarchy, depending on the market liquidity of the debt.

13. Share Repurchases

On August 23, 2021, our Board of Directors authorized a $1.0 billion share repurchase program (the “2021 Repurchase Program”), replacing our 2015 Repurchase Program. The 2021 Repurchase Program allows the Company to repurchase shares of our Common Stock, through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase arrangements, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise and has no set expiration date. In connection with this authorization, the remaining amount of $700 million authorized under 2015 Repurchase Program was terminated.

On February 24, 2022, pursuant to existing stock repurchase authorizations, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement with a third-party financial institution to repurchase $400 million of our Common Stock. At inception, we paid the financial institution $400 million and took initial delivery of 7,056,229 shares of our Common Stock. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, upon settlement, we would either receive additional shares from the financial institution or be required to deliver additional shares or cash to the financial institution. In the second quarter of 2022, the ASR agreement was completed and we paid the financial institution an additional $54.2 million. When combining the initial $400 million paid at the inception of the ASR agreement and the cash settlement of $54.2 million at the termination of the ASR agreement, we repurchased approximately 7,056,229 shares at an average repurchase price of $64.37 per share. This ASR will exhaust most of the remaining share repurchase authorization established in the 2021 Repurchase Program. Following the completion of the current authorization, our Board of Director has approved the establishment of a new $1.0 billion share repurchase authorization.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2022, we repurchased 7,589,664 shares of Common Stock in the open market under the 2021 Repurchase Program for approximately $422.1 million. This includes 7,056,229 shares purchased under the ASR agreement.

The extent to which we repurchase our shares and the timing of any such repurchases depend on a number of factors, including market and business conditions, the price of our shares, and corporate, regulatory and other considerations.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

~~13.~~14. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth the changes in AOCI, net of tax, by component during the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~June 30, 2020:~~

Foreign Currency Translation Gain (Loss) Net Actuarial Gain and Prior Service Cost Amortization of Gain on Interest Rate Swap Net Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities Held in Trust Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Balance at March 31, 2021 $ (1,822.9) $ (105.9) $ 4.2 $ 1.1 $ (1,923.5)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 287.9 1.3 0.5 3.6 293.3
Tax (expense) benefit 9.3 (0.1) 0 0 9.2
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 297.2 1.2 0.5 3.6 302.5
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (3.3) 0 0 0 (3.3)
Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ (1,529.0) $ (104.7) $ 4.7 $ 4.7 $ (1,624.3)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Balance at March 31, 2020 $ (2,072.9) $ (127.8) $ 2.6 $ 14.1 $ (2,184.0)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 56.5 2.6 0.5 12.5 72.1
Tax (expense) benefit (1.2) 3.4 (0.2) (4.6) (2.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 55.3 6.0 0.3 7.9 69.5
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 1.3 0 0 0 1.3
Balance as of June 30, 2020 $ (2,016.3) $ (121.8) $ 2.9 $ 22.0 $ (2,113.2)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Balance at December 31, 2020 $ (1,719.1) $ (109.7) $ 3.7 $ 18.9 $ (1,806.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 173.5 2.6 1.0 (14.2) 162.9
Tax (expense) benefit 17.6 2.4 0 0 20.0
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 191.1 5.0 1.0 (14.2) 182.9
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (1.0) 0 0 0 (1.0)
Balance as of June 30, 2021 $ (1,529.0) $ (104.7) $ 4.7 $ 4.7 $ (1,624.3)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Balance at December 31, 2019 $ (1,476.8) $ (129.6) $ 2.1 $ 6.1 $ (1,598.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (539.4) 12.3 1.0 20.5 (505.6)
Tax (expense) benefit (8.7) (4.5) (0.2) (4.6) (18.0)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (548.1) 7.8 0.8 15.9 (523.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 8.6 0 0 0 8.6
Balance as of June 30, 2020 $ (2,016.3) $ (121.8) $ 2.9 $ 22.0 $ (2,113.2)

March 31, 2021:


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~


	Foreign Currency Translation Gain (Loss)		Net Actuarial Gain and Prior Service Cost		Amortization of Gain on Interest Rate Swap		Net Gain (Loss) on Marketable Securities Held in Trust		Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
Balance at December 31, 2021	$	(1,825.5)	$	(72.8)	$	5.2	$	1.3	$	(1,891.8)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	302.5		0.7		0.5		(37.0)		266.7
Tax (expense) benefit	2.8		(0.3)		—		8.6		11.1
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	305.3		0.4		0.5		(28.4)		277.8
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest	(4.3)		—		—		—		(4.3)
Balance as of March 31, 2022	$	(1,524.5)	$	(72.4)	$	5.7	$	(27.1)	$	(1,618.3)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
Balance at December 31, 2020	$	(1,719.1)	$	(109.7)	$	3.7	$	18.9	$	(1,806.2)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(114.4)		1.3		0.5		(17.8)		(130.4)
Tax (expense) benefit	8.3		2.5		—		—		10.8
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(106.1)		3.8		0.5		(17.8)		(119.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest	2.3		—		—		—		2.3
Balance as of March 31, 2021	$	(1,822.9)	$	(105.9)	$	4.2	$	1.1	$	(1,923.5)

~~14.~~15. Related Party Transactions

We enter into transactions and agreements with certain of our non-consolidated companies and other related parties from time to time. As of ~~June 30, 2021, the net amount due to our non-consolidated companies totaled $73.3 million. As of~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the net amount due from our ~~affiliates and~~ non-consolidated companies totaled ~~$55.9 million.~~$156.8 million and $63.0 million, respectively. These amounts include a long-term indemnification asset from Vale S.A. for reimbursement of pension plan obligations. This asset had a balance of ~~$22.2~~$24.9 million and ~~$23.0~~$21.0 million as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.

The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings included the following transactions with our non-consolidated companies:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2021 2020 2021 2020
Transactions with related parties included in net sales $ 196.4 $ 222.5 $ 353.8 $ 371.1
Transactions with related parties included in cost of goods sold 239.6 218.4 489.4 395.5


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
Transactions with related parties included in net sales	$	513.0	$	157.4
Transactions with related parties included in cost of goods sold	511.1		217.7

As part of the MWSPC joint venture, we market approximately 25% of ~~the~~ MWSPC production. Marketing fees of approximately ~~$3.0~~$3.3 million and ~~$4.6 million, and $1.5 million and $1.9~~$1.6 million, are included in revenue for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and June 30, 2020,~~ respectively.

In 2015, we agreed to provide funds to finance the purchase and construction of two articulated tug and barge units, intended to transport anhydrous ammonia for our operations, through a bridge loan agreement with Gulf Marine Solutions, LLC (“GMS”). GMS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Gulf Sulphur Services Ltd., LLLP (“Gulf Sulphur Services”), an entity in which we and a joint venture partner, Savage Companies (“Savage”), each indirectly own a 50% equity interest and for which a subsidiary of Savage provides operating and management services. GMS provided these funds through draws on the Mosaic bridge loan and


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

through additional loans from Gulf Sulphur Services. We are the primary beneficiary of GMS, a variable interest entity, and consolidate GMS’s operations in our ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment.

On October 24, 2017, a lease financing transaction was completed with respect to the completed tug and barge unit and, following the application of proceeds from the transaction, all outstanding loans made by Gulf Sulphur Services to GMS, together with accrued interest, were repaid, and the bridge loans related to the first unit’s construction were repaid. As of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there were outstanding bridge loans of $74.7 million relating to the cancelled second barge and the remaining tug, which bridge loans are eliminated in consolidation. Reserves against the bridge loans of approximately $54.2 million were established in 2018 and remain unchanged. Several subsidiaries of Savage operate vessels utilized by Mosaic under time charter arrangements, including the ammonia tug and barge unit.

~~15.~~16. Contingencies

We have described below material judicial and administrative proceedings to which we are subject.

Environmental Matters

We have contingent environmental liabilities that arise principally from three sources: (i) facilities currently or formerly owned by our subsidiaries or their predecessors; (ii) facilities adjacent to currently or formerly owned facilities; and (iii) third-party Superfund or state equivalent sites. At facilities currently or formerly owned by our subsidiaries or their predecessors, the historical use and handling of regulated chemical substances, crop and animal nutrients and additives and by-product or process tailings have resulted in soil, surface water and/or groundwater contamination. Spills or other releases of regulated substances, subsidence from mining operations and other incidents arising out of operations, including accidents, have occurred previously at these facilities, and potentially could occur in the future, possibly requiring us to undertake or fund cleanup or result in monetary damage awards, fines, penalties, other liabilities, injunctions or other court or administrative rulings. In some instances, pursuant to consent orders or agreements with governmental agencies, we are undertaking certain remedial actions or investigations to determine whether remedial action may be required to address contamination. At other locations, we have


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~

entered into consent orders or agreements with appropriate governmental agencies to perform required remedial activities that will address identified site conditions. Taking into consideration established accruals of approximately ~~$48.1~~$56.2 million and ~~$61.4~~$57.3 million as of ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, expenditures for these known conditions currently are not expected, individually or in the aggregate, to have a material effect on our business or financial condition. However, material expenditures could be required in the future to remediate the contamination at known sites or at other current or former sites or as a result of other environmental, health and safety matters. Below is a discussion of the more significant environmental matters.

New Wales Water Loss Incident. In August 2016, a sinkhole developed under 1 of the 2 cells of the active Gypstack at our New Wales facility in Polk County, Florida, resulting in process water from the stack draining into the sinkhole. The incident was reported to the FDEP and EPA. In October 2016, our subsidiary, Mosaic Fertilizer, entered into a consent order (the “Order”) with the FDEP relating to the incident. Under the Order, Mosaic Fertilizer agreed to, among other things: implement a remediation plan to close the sinkhole; perform additional monitoring of the groundwater quality and act to assess and remediate in the event monitored off-site water does not comply with applicable standards as a result of the incident; evaluate the risk of potential future sinkhole formation at the New Wales facility and at Mosaic Fertilizer’s active Gypstack operations at the Bartow, Riverview and Plant City facilities and provide recommendations to address any identified issues; and provide financial assurance of no less than $40.0 million, which we have done without the need for any expenditure of corporate funds through satisfaction of a financial strength test and Mosaic parent guarantee. The Order did not require payment of civil penalties relating to the incident.

As of ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the sinkhole repairs were substantially complete. Additional expenditures could be required in the future for additional remediation or other measures in connection with the sinkhole including if, for example, the FDEP or EPA were to request additional measures to address risks presented by the Gypstack. These expenditures could be material. In addition, we are unable to predict at this time what, if any, impact the New Wales water loss incident will have on future Florida permitting efforts.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

EPA RCRA Initiative. We have certain financial assurance and other obligations under consent decrees and a separate financial assurance arrangement relating to our facilities in Florida and Louisiana. These obligations are discussed in Note 910 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Florida Sulfuric Acid Plants. On April 8, 2010, EPA Region 4 submitted an administrative subpoena to us under Section 114 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the “CAA”) regarding compliance of our Florida sulfuric acid plants with the “New Source Review” requirements of the CAA. The request received by Mosaic appears to be part of a broader EPA national enforcement initiative focusing on sulfuric acid plants. On June 6, 2010, EPA issued a notice of violation to CF (the “CF NOV”) with respect to “New Source Review” compliance at the Plant City ~~Facility's~~Facility’s sulfuric acid plants and the allegations in the CF NOV were not resolved before our 2014 acquisition of the Plant City Facility. CF has agreed to indemnify us with respect to any penalty EPA may assess as a result of the allegations in the CF NOV.

We have been engaged in settlement discussions with U.S. EPA and the Department of Justice, originating with the allegations of violations of Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permitting requirements at the Plant City sulfuric acid plants and encompassing injunctive relief regarding sulfur dioxide emissions across Mosaic’s Florida sulfuric acid plant fleet. With the closure of the Plant City Facility fertilizer operations, there is no longer a need to reach resolution with the government on injunctive relief (i.e., reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions) at that facility. Furthermore, the Department of Justice has determined that there is no basis for proceeding with a settlement, as EPA and the Department have not currently alleged any violations of the Clean Air Act PSD permitting requirements at any other of Mosaic’s Florida sulfuric acid plants. On July 24, 2020, the DOJ filed a complaint against CF and stipulation of settlement, including a $550,000 civil penalty, concluding enforcement against CF related to the CF NOV.

We cannot predict at this time whether EPA and DOJ will initiate an enforcement action in the future with respect to “New Source Review” compliance at our Florida sulfuric acid plants or what its scope would be, or what the range of outcomes might be with respect to such a potential enforcement action.

Uncle Sam Gypstack. In January 2019, we observed lateral movement of the north slope of our active phosphogypsum stack at the Uncle Sam facility in Louisiana. The observation was reported to the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and the U.S. EPA. We continue to provide updates to the agencies on the movement, which has slowed following actions we have taken, which include reducing process water volume stored atop the stack to reduce the active load causing the movement; constructing a stability berm at the base of the slope to increase resistance; and removing gypsum from the north side to the


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~

south side. These steps have improved slope stability, reduced slope movement and reduced our capacity to store process water. There has been no loss of containment resulting from the movement observed, and none is expected. Although continued lateral movement on the north slope could have a material effect on our future operations at that facility, we cannot predict the prospective impact on our results of operations at this time.

Other Environmental Matters. Superfund and equivalent state statutes impose liability without regard to fault or to the legality of a party’s conduct on certain categories of persons who are considered to have contributed to the release of “hazardous substances” into the environment. Under Superfund, or its various state analogues, one party may, under certain circumstances, be required to bear more than its proportionate share of cleanup costs at a site where it has liability if payments cannot be obtained from other responsible parties. Currently, certain of our subsidiaries are involved or concluding involvement at several Superfund or equivalent state sites. Our remedial liability from these sites, alone or in the aggregate, currently is not expected to have a material effect on our business or financial condition. As more information is obtained regarding these sites and the potentially responsible parties involved, this expectation could change.

We believe that, pursuant to several indemnification agreements, our subsidiaries are entitled to at least partial, and in many instances complete, indemnification for the costs that may be expended by us or our subsidiaries to remedy environmental issues at certain facilities. These agreements address issues that resulted from activities occurring prior to our acquisition of facilities or businesses from parties including, but not limited to, ARCO (BP); Beatrice Fund for Environmental Liabilities; Conoco; Conserv; Estech, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation; Kerr-McGee Inc.; PPG Industries, Inc.; The Williams Companies; CF; and certain other private parties. Our subsidiaries have already received and anticipate receiving amounts pursuant to the indemnification agreements for certain of their expenses incurred to date as well as future anticipated expenditures. We record potential indemnifications as an offset to the established accruals when they are realizable or realized. The failure of an indemnitor to fulfill its obligations could result in future costs that could be material.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Louisiana Parishes Coastal Zone Cases

Several Louisiana parishes and the City of New Orleans have filed lawsuits against hundreds of oil and gas companies seeking regulatory, restoration and compensatory damages in connection with historical oil, gas and sulfur mining and transportation operations in the coastal zone of Louisiana. Mosaic is the corporate successor to certain companies which performed these types of operations in the coastal zone of Louisiana. Mosaic has been named in two of the lawsuits filed to date. In addition, in several other cases, historical oil, gas and sulfur operations which may have been related to Mosaic’s corporate predecessors have been identified in the complaints. Based upon information known to date, Mosaic has contractual indemnification rights against third parties for any loss or liability arising out of these claims pursuant to indemnification agreements entered into by Mosaic’s corporate predecessor(s) with third parties. There may also be insurance contracts which may respond to some or all of the claims. However, the financial ability of the third-party indemnitors, the extent of potential insurance coverage and the extent of potential liability from these claims is currently unknown.

In September 2019, counsel for several of the parishes announced that an agreement had been reached to settle the claims against Mosaic and its corporate predecessors, subject to approval by the participating parishes and the State of Louisiana. In connection with that settlement agreement, the proposed settlement payment obligations would be paid by third-party indemnitors.

North America Phosphate Operations

Denial of the permits sought, ~~at any of our mines or fertilizer manufacturing facilities,~~ issuance of the permits with cost-prohibitive conditions, substantial delays in issuing the permits, legal actions that prevent us from relying on permits or revocation of permits may create challenges for us to mine the phosphate rock or ~~required~~ to operate our Florida and Louisiana phosphate plants at desired levels or increase our costs in the future.

Brazil Legal Contingencies

Our Brazilian subsidiaries are engaged in a number of judicial and administrative proceedings regarding labor, environmental, mining and civil claims that allege aggregate damages and/or fines of approximately ~~$872~~$843.1 million. We estimate that our probable aggregate loss with respect to these claims is approximately ~~$66.6~~$69.2 million, which is included in our accrued liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

Approximately ~~$693.2~~$653.3 million of the maximum potential loss relates to labor claims, such as in-house and third-party


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~

employees’ judicial proceedings alleging the right to receive overtime pay, additional payment due to work in hazardous conditions, risk premium, profit sharing, additional payment due to night work, salary parity and wage differences. We estimate that our probable aggregate loss regarding these claims is approximately ~~$59.3~~$61.2 million, which has been accrued as of ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

Based on Brazilian legislation and the current status of similar labor cases involving unrelated companies, we believe we have recorded adequate loss contingency reserves sufficient to cover our estimate of probable losses. If the status of similar cases involving unrelated companies were to adversely change in the future, our maximum exposure could increase and additional accruals could be required.

The environmental, judicial and administrative proceedings claims allege aggregate damages and/or fines in excess of ~~$20.1~~$23.1 million; however, we estimate that our probable aggregate loss regarding these claims is approximately ~~$5.2~~$5.9 million, which has been accrued as of ~~June 30, 2021.~~

The mining judicial and administrative proceedings claims allege aggregate damages and/or fines of approximately $4.3 million. We estimate that our probable aggregate loss regarding these claims will be immaterial as of June 30, 2021.March 31, 2022.

Our Brazilian subsidiaries also have certain other civil contingent liabilities with respect to judicial, administrative and arbitration proceedings and claims related to contract disputes, pension plan matters, real ~~state~~estate disputes, regulatory issues and other civil matters arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims allege aggregate damages in excess of ~~$154.4~~$166.6 million. We estimate that the probable aggregate loss with respect to these matters is approximately ~~$2.2~~$2.1 million.

Uberaba Judicial Settlement

In 2013, the Federal Public Prosecutor filed a public civil action requesting that the Company adopt several measures to mitigate soil and water contamination related to the Gypstack at our Uberaba facility, located in the State of Minas Gerais, including compensation for the alleged social and environmental damages. In 2014, our predecessor subsidiary in Brazil entered into a judicial settlement with the Federal Public Prosecutor, the State of Minas Gerais public prosecutor and the federal


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

environmental agency. Under this agreement, we agreed to implement remediation measures such as: constructing a liner under the Gypstack water ponds and lagoons, and monitoring the groundwater and soil quality. We also agreed to create a private reserve of natural heritage and to pay compensation in the amount of approximately $0.3 million, which was paid in July 2018. We are currently acting in compliance with our obligations under the judicial settlement and expect them to be completed by December 31, ~~2023.~~

~~Uberaba EHS Class Action~~

In 2013, the State of Minas Gerais public prosecutor filed a class action claiming that our predecessor company in Brazil did not comply with labor safety rules and working hour laws. This claim was based on an inspection conducted by the Labor and Employment Ministry in 2010, following which we were fined for not complying with several labor regulations. We filed our defense, claiming that we complied with these labor regulations and that the assessment carried out by the inspectors in 2010 was abusive. Following the initial hearing, the court ordered an examination to determine whether there has been any non-compliance with labor regulations. The examination is currently pending and the parties are negotiating a settlement. The amount claimed in the proceeding is $31.9 million.2025.

Brazil Tax Contingencies

Our Brazilian subsidiaries are engaged in a number of judicial and administrative proceedings relating to various non-income tax matters. We estimate that our maximum potential liability with respect to these matters is approximately ~~$385.6~~$468.3 million, of which ~~$177.4~~$218.7 million is subject to an indemnification agreement entered into with Vale S.A in connection with the Acquisition.

Approximately ~~$250.5~~$280.3 million of the maximum potential liability relates to a Brazilian federal value added tax, PIS and COFINS, and tax credit cases, while the majority of the remaining amount relates to various other non-income tax cases. The maximum potential liability can increase with new ~~audits.~~audits from Brazilian tax authorities. Based on Brazil tax legislation and the current status of similar tax cases involving unrelated taxpayers, we believe we have recorded adequate loss contingency reserves sufficient to cover our estimate of probable losses, which are immaterial. If the status of similar tax cases involving unrelated taxpayer changes in the future, additional accruals could be required.


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~

Other Claims

We also have certain other contingent liabilities with respect to judicial, administrative and arbitration proceedings and claims of third parties, including tax matters, arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that any of these contingent liabilities will have a material adverse impact on our business or financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

~~16.~~17. Business Segments

The reportable segments are determined by management based upon factors such as products and services, production processes, technologies, market dynamics, and for which segment financial information is available for our chief operating decision maker.

We evaluate performance based on the operating earnings of the respective business segments, which includes certain allocations of corporate selling, general and administrative expenses. The segment results may not represent the actual results that would be expected if they were independent, stand-alone businesses. Intersegment eliminations, including profit on intersegment sales, mark-to-market gains/losses on derivatives, debt expenses, Streamsong Resort® results of operations and the results of the China and India distribution businesses are included within Corporate, Eliminations and Other. For a description of our business segments, see Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Segment information for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~ was as follows:


	Phosphate		Potash		Mosaic Fertilizantes		Corporate, Eliminations and Other (a)		Total
Three months ended March 31, 2022
Net sales to external customers	$	1,152.8	$	1,035.7	$	1,488.6	$	245.2	$	3,922.3
Intersegment net sales	343.2		24.1		—		(367.3)		—
Net sales	1,496.0		1,059.8		1,488.6		(122.1)		3,922.3
Gross margin	527.7		578.9		219.3		113.2		1,439.1
Canadian resource taxes	—		157.2		—		—		157.2
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes)	527.7		736.1		219.3		113.2		1,596.3
Operating earnings	492.5		563.3		186.7		13.3		1,255.8
Capital expenditures	147.7		65.1		75.1		2.6		290.5
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	120.5		77.0		25.2		4.0		226.7



Three months ended March 31, 2021
Net sales to external customers	$	884.6	$	473.1	$	763.4	$	176.0	$	2,297.1
Intersegment net sales	116.4		4.3		—		(120.7)		—
Net sales	1,001.0		477.4		763.4		55.3		2,297.1
Gross margin	172.6		140.2		103.1		19.0		434.9
Canadian resource taxes	—		35.0		—		—		35.0
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes)	172.6		175.2		103.1		19.0		469.9

Operating earnings (loss)	152.9		124.9		90.5		(55.1)		313.2
Capital expenditures	152.5		96.5		38.8		0.8		288.6
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	102.4		79.5		23.2		4.0		209.1






























Total Assets
As of March 31, 2022	$	8,901.3	$	8,887.6	$	5,984.8	$	(350.6)	$	23,423.1
As of December 31, 2021	8,776.4		8,312.8		4,908.2		39.0		22,036.4

(a)The “Corporate, Eliminations and Other” category includes the results of our ancillary distribution operations in India and China. For the three months ended March 31, 2022, distribution operations in India and China had revenue of $220.9 million, and gross margin of $87.0 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2021, distribution operations in India and China had revenue of $159.6 million, and gross margin of $30.3 million.


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Phosphates Potash Mosaic Fertilizantes Corporate, Eliminations and Other (a) Total
Three months ended June 30, 2021
Net sales to external customers $ 910.2 $ 659.1 $ 1,035.7 $ 195.7 $ 2,800.7
Intersegment net sales 264.6 3.9 0 (268.5) 0
Net sales 1,174.8 663.0 1,035.7 (72.8) 2,800.7
Gross margin 308.5 217.2 185.1 41.5 752.3
Canadian resource taxes 0 54.2 0 0 54.2
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes) 308.5 271.4 185.1 41.5 806.5
Mine closure costs 0 158.1 0 0 158.1
Operating earnings (loss) 283.1 48.9 170.5 (18.5) 484.0
Capital expenditures 150.0 98.2 44.3 4.7 297.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 105.6 70.3 23.8 3.8 203.5
Three months ended June 30, 2020
Net sales to external customers $ 550.1 $ 544.8 $ 787.0 $ 162.8 $ 2,044.7
Intersegment net sales 212.3 10.6 0 (222.9) 0
Net sales 762.4 555.4 787.0 (60.1) 2,044.7
Gross margin 17.7 131.6 100.7 7.0 257.0
Canadian resource taxes 0 52.1 0 0 52.1
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes) 17.7 183.7 100.7 7.0 309.1
Operating earnings (loss) (59.4) 125.5 76.4 (56.7) 85.8
Capital expenditures 122.2 111.4 19.7 3.9 257.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 113.9 71.8 27.0 2.7 215.4
Six months ended June 30, 2021
Net sales to external customers $ 1,794.8 $ 1,132.2 $ 1,799.1 $ 371.7 $ 5,097.8
Intersegment net sales 381.0 8.2 0 (389.2) 0
Net sales 2,175.8 1,140.4 1,799.1 (17.5) 5,097.8
Gross margin 481.1 357.4 288.2 60.5 1,187.2
Canadian resource taxes 0 89.2 0 0 89.2
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes) 481.1 446.6 288.2 60.5 1,276.4
Mine closure costs 0 158.1 0 0 158.1
Operating earnings (loss) 436.0 173.8 261.0 (73.6) 797.2
Capital expenditures 302.5 194.7 83.1 5.5 585.8
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 208.0 149.8 47.0 7.8 412.6
Six months ended June 30, 2020
Net sales to external customers $ 1,087.4 $ 983.4 $ 1,518.1 $ 253.9 $ 3,842.8
Intersegment net sales 294.4 13.6 0 (308.0) 0
Net sales 1,381.8 997.0 1,518.1 (54.1) 3,842.8
Gross margin (65.2) 240.7 167.2 (44.3) 298.4
Canadian resource taxes 0 83.8 0 0 83.8
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes) (65.2) 324.5 167.2 (44.3) 382.2
Operating earnings (loss) (166.2) 219.7 105.4 (139.3) 19.6
Capital expenditures 260.1 209.7 45.0 5.9 520.7
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 228.3 141.9 55.2 7.8 433.2
Total Assets
As of June 30, 2021 $ 7,826.5 $ 7,809.5 $ 5,098.4 $ 739.1 $ 21,473.5
As of December 31, 2020 7,022.1 7,614.8 4,127.7 1,025.2 19,789.8


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~

~~(a)~~The “Corporate, Eliminations and Other” category includes the results of our ancillary distribution operations in India and China. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, distribution operations in India and China had revenue of $180.0 million and $339.6 million, respectively, and gross margin of $42.7 million and $72.9 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, distribution operations in India and China had revenue of $161.5 million and $238.3 million, respectively, and gross margin of $20.0 million and $22.0 million, respectively.

Financial information relating to our operations by geographic area is as follows:


		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	(in millions)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(in millions)	2022		2021
Net sales(a):	Net sales(a):									Net sales(a):
Brazil	Brazil	$	1,014.4	$	757.0	$	1,782.2	$	1,469.7	Brazil	$	1,448.5	$	767.8
Canpotex(b)										Canpotex(b)	492.5		150.2
Canada	Canada	228.4		137.4		418.8		254.7		Canada	230.5		190.4
Canpotex(b)		187.3		215.8		337.5		362.2
China	China	116.5		74.5		242.2		113.9		China	220.8		125.7
Mexico										Mexico	67.9		50.2
Argentina										Argentina	53.6		17.3
Paraguay										Paraguay	35.0		19.0
Colombia	Colombia	38.6		25.8		66.4		40.0		Colombia	32.2		27.8
India		73.8		100.8		103.3		138.0
Paraguay		32.6		26.4		51.6		42.7
Mexico		31.9		22.8		82.1		47.7
Japan	Japan	30.2		32.6		51.9		44.5		Japan	26.5		21.7
Argentina		27.7		55.1		45.0		83.1
Peru		13.6		0		14.2		6.0
Australia										Australia	24.9		23.8
Honduras	Honduras	8.3		10.5		11.1		17.5		Honduras	3.4		2.8
Thailand	Thailand	7.7		4.7		10.8		9.1		Thailand	2.3		3.1
Dominican Republic	Dominican Republic	3.2		0		9.8		0		Dominican Republic	2.2		6.6
Australia		0.3		0.3		24.1		41.3
India										India	—		29.5
Other	Other	14.4		19.7		27.0		49.8		Other	20.2		13.2
Total international countries	Total international countries	1,828.9		1,483.4		3,278.0		2,720.2		Total international countries	2,660.5		1,449.1
United States	United States	971.8		561.3		1,819.8		1,122.6		United States	1,261.8		848.0
Consolidated	Consolidated	$	2,800.7	$	2,044.7	$	5,097.8	$	3,842.8	Consolidated	$	3,922.3	$	2,297.1

(a)Revenues are attributed to countries based on location of customer.

(b)Canpotex is the export association of two Saskatchewan potash producers. The net sales of potash from Mosaic to Canpotex included in our consolidated financial statements in the Net Sales line represent Mosaic’s sales of potash to Canpotex, and are recognized upon delivery to the unrelated third-party customer. Canpotex annual sales to the ultimate third-party customers are approximately: ~~25%~~30% to customers based in Brazil, ~~22%~~14% to customers based in Indonesia, 11% to customers based in China, ~~10%~~6% to customers based in India, ~~8% to customers based in Indonesia~~ and ~~35%~~39% to customers based in the rest of the world.

2726


Table of Contents


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

Net sales by product type are as follows:


		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended March 31,
(in millions)	(in millions)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(in millions)	2022		2021
Sales by product type:	Sales by product type:									Sales by product type:
Phosphate Crop Nutrients	Phosphate Crop Nutrients	$	835.8	$	559.6	$	1,502.4	$	1,106.8	Phosphate Crop Nutrients	$	958.8	$	666.6
Potash Crop Nutrients	Potash Crop Nutrients	804.8		658.0		1,362.3		1,129.0		Potash Crop Nutrients	1,194.8		557.5
Crop Nutrient Blends	Crop Nutrient Blends	333.9		252.0		648.6		539.3		Crop Nutrient Blends	553.0		314.7
Performance Products(a)	Performance Products(a)	455.4		341.2		854.8		552.9		Performance Products(a)	616.4		399.4
Phosphate Rock	Phosphate Rock	18.4		7.5		35.3		14.0		Phosphate Rock	27.1		16.9
Other(b)	Other(b)	352.4		226.4		694.4		500.8		Other(b)	572.2		342.0
		$	2,800.7	$	2,044.7	$	5,097.8	$	3,842.8		$	3,922.3	$	2,297.1

(a)Includes sales of MicroEssentials®, K-Mag, Aspire and Sus-Terra.

(b)Includes sales of industrial potash, feed products, nitrogen and other products.


~~Table of Contents~~


			~~THE MOSAIC COMPANY~~
~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)~~

~~17. Esterhazy Closure Costs~~

Due to increased brine inflows, on June 4, 2021, the Company made the decision to accelerate the timing of the shutdown of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine. Closing the K1 and K2 shafts are key pieces of the transition to the K3 shaft, but the timeline for the closure was accelerated by approximately nine months. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, we recognized pre-tax costs of $158.1 million related to the permanent closure of these facilities. These costs consisted of $109.9 million related to the write-off of fixed assets, $37.1 million related to AROs, and $11.1 million related to inventory and other reserves.

~~We have begun the process to resume production at our previously idled Colonsay potash mine to offset a portion of the production lost at Esterhazy.~~


~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the material under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Mosaic Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 (the “10-K Report”) and the material under Item 1 of Part I of this report.

Throughout the discussion below, we measure units of production, sales and raw materials in metric tonnes, which are the equivalent of 2,205 pounds, unless we specifically state we mean long ton(s), which are the equivalent of 2,240 pounds. In the following tables, there are certain percentages that are not considered to be meaningful and are represented by “NM.”


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table shows the results of operations for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~June 30, 2020:~~March 31, 2021:

Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, 2021-2020 June 30, 2021-2020
(in millions, except per share data) 2021 2020 Change Percent 2021 2020 Change Percent
Net sales $ 2,800.7 $ 2,044.7 $ 756.0 37 % $ 5,097.8 $ 3,842.8 $ 1,255.0 33 %
Cost of goods sold 2,048.4 1,787.7 260.7 15 % 3,910.6 3,544.4 366.2 10 %
Gross margin 752.3 257.0 495.3 193 % 1,187.2 298.4 888.8 NM
Gross margin percentage 27 % 13 % 23 % 8 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses 107.6 95.1 12.5 13 % 209.3 163.0 46.3 28 %
Mine closure costs 158.1 — 158.1 NM 158.1 — 158.1 NM
Other operating expense 2.6 76.1 (73.5) (97) % 22.6 115.8 (93.2) (80) %
Operating earnings 484.0 85.8 398.2 NM 797.2 19.6 777.6 NM
Interest expense, net (37.3) (49.3) 12.0 (24) % (82.3) (90.4) 8.1 (9) %
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss) 111.1 34.1 77.0 NM 65.3 (180.1) 245.4 (136) %
Other income 1.4 2.4 (1.0) (42) % 4.4 6.9 (2.5) (36) %
Earnings (loss) from consolidated companies before income taxes 559.2 73.0 486.2 NM 784.6 (244.0) 1,028.6 NM
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 115.9 (2.7) 118.6 NM 175.6 (135.7) 311.3 NM
Earnings (loss) from consolidated companies 443.3 75.7 367.6 NM 609.0 (108.3) 717.3 NM
Equity in net (loss) of nonconsolidated companies (4.5) (29.8) 25.3 (85) % (12.0) (49.8) 37.8 (76) %
Net earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests 438.8 45.9 392.9 NM 597.0 (158.1) 755.1 NM
Less: Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 1.6 (1.5) 3.1 NM 3.1 (2.5) 5.6 NM
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Mosaic $ 437.2 $ 47.4 $ 389.8 NM $ 593.9 $ (155.6) $ 749.5 NM
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic $ 1.14 $ 0.12 $ 1.02 NM $ 1.55 $ (0.41) $ 1.96 NM
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding 383.3 381.3 383.0 378.9


	Three months ended
	March 31,						2022-2021
(in millions, except per share data)	2022			2021			Change		Percent
Net sales	$	3,922.3		$	2,297.1		$	1,625.2	71	%
Cost of goods sold	2,483.2			1,862.2			621.0		33	%
Gross margin	1,439.1			434.9			1,004.2		NM
Gross margin percentage	37		%	19		%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	132.4			101.7			30.7		30	%


Other operating expense	50.9			20.0			30.9		155	%
Operating earnings	1,255.8			313.2			942.6		NM

Interest expense, net	(39.3)			(45.0)			5.7		(13)	%
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)	310.7			(45.8)			356.5		NM
Other income	0.2			3.0			(2.8)		(93)	%
Earnings from consolidated companies before income taxes	1,527.4			225.4			1,302.0		NM
Provision for income taxes	372.4			59.7			312.7		NM
Earnings from consolidated companies	1,155.0			165.7			989.3		NM
Equity in net earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated companies	30.7			(7.5)			38.2		NM
Net earnings including noncontrolling interests	1,185.7			158.2			1,027.5		NM
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	3.7			1.5			2.2		147	%
Net earnings attributable to Mosaic	$	1,182.0		$	156.7		$	1,025.3	NM
Diluted net earnings per share attributable to Mosaic	$	3.19		$	0.41		$	2.78	NM
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	370.1			382.8

Overview of Consolidated Results for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, Mosaic had net income of ~~$437.2 million,~~$1.2 billion, or ~~$1.14~~$3.19 per diluted share, compared to net income of ~~$47.4 million,~~$0.2 billion, or ~~$0.12~~$0.41 per diluted share, for the prior year period.


~~Table of Contents~~

Significant factors affecting our results of operations and financial condition are listed below. Certain of these factors are discussed in more detail in the following sections of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, operating results in all of our segments benefited from higher average sales prices compared to the prior year period. Average selling prices rose throughout 2021 and into 2022, driven by tightness in global supply and demand and improved grain prices. In addition, the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has resulted in instability in global commodities markets and significantly reduced the physical supply of fertilizer and agricultural commodities produced in those geographies, which has contributed to rising fertilizer prices globally.

Our operating results for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 were favorably impacted in our ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment by significantly higher average selling prices than the prior year ~~period. Sales prices have continued to rise, after reaching a low in the first quarter of 2020,~~period, driven by ~~tightness in global supply and demand, strong farmer economics and improved grain prices.~~the factors described above. The benefit from higher sales prices was partially offset by higher raw material costs, primarily sulfur and ammonia, in the current year period compared to the prior year period. ~~Availability~~The purchase prices of ~~molten sulfur has been impacted~~these raw materials are driven by ~~refinery closures in 2020~~global supply and 2021, due to lower fuel demand and extreme cold weather in the first quarter of 2021 in the southern United States, where several refineries are located. The low sulfur availability constrained our productiondemand. Operating results in the current year period ~~and along with a lack of inventory,~~were unfavorably impacted by lower sales volumes. Sales volumes were lower due to low inventory levels and longer rail cycle times in ~~the current period. We do not expect sulfur availability to impact our phosphate production for the remainder of the year, as refinery performance improves.~~North America that were primarily driven by adverse weather conditions and third-party labor issues.

Our operating results during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022 were favorably impacted in our Potash segment by higher average sales prices compared to the prior year ~~period. Prices began~~period as discussed above. Current period operating results were unfavorably impacted by lower sales volumes. Similar to ~~strengthen~~Phosphate, the lower sales volumes were primarily caused by logistical constraints, resulting in longer rail cycle times in North America driven by weather conditions in Canada and Brazil in the fourth quarter of 2020, due to increased demand and tight supply. Prices have continued to increase in 2021. Logistical challenges at Canpotex resulted in lower sales volumes in the current year period compared to the prior year period. Operating results were also unfavorably impacted by expenses related to the closure of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine, further discussed below.third-party labor issues.

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our operating results were favorably impacted byin our Mosaic Fertilizantes segment. Sales prices increased compared to the same period in the prior year ~~due to tight global supply and demand.~~as discussed above. The favorable results were partially offset by lower sales volumes. The lower sales volumes were primarily due to ~~lower product availability, low inventory~~adverse climate conditions in certain areas of Brazil, inflationary pressure on production costs and increased raw materials costs, as global prices of sulfur and ammonia were higher in the current year period.

In addition to the items noted above, our current period results were ~~negatively~~positively impacted by a total of ~~$27~~$371 million pre-tax, or ~~$0.03~~$0.78 per diluted share, related to the following notable items:

•~~Expense related to the closure~~Foreign currency transaction gain of ~~our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine of $158~~$311 million, or ~~$(0.30)~~$0.62 per diluted share

•~~Depreciation expense~~Unrealized gain on derivatives of ~~$15~~$100 million, or ~~$(0.04)~~$0.21 per diluted share ~~related to the acceleration of the closure of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan mine as we ramp up K3~~

•~~Other operating expenses~~Discrete income tax benefit of ~~$18~~$9 million, or ~~$(0.02)~~$0.03 per diluted share ~~related to maintaining closed and indefinitely idled facilities and asset retirement obligations~~

•Functional currency impact in cost of goods sold of $6$18 million, or ~~$(0.01) per diluted share~~

•~~Foreign currency transaction gain of $111 million, or $0.21 per diluted share~~

•~~Unrealized gain on derivatives of $38 million, or $0.08~~$(0.03) per diluted share

•Other operating ~~income~~expenses of ~~$20~~$13 million, or ~~$0.04 per diluted share, related to the sale of our warehouse in Houston, Texas~~

•~~Discrete income tax benefit of $6 million, or $0.01 per diluted share~~

•~~Other non-operating income of $1 million related to a realized gain on RCRA trust securities~~

~~Other Highlights~~

•Due to increased brine inflows, on June 4, 2021, the Company made the decision to accelerate the timing of the shutdown of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine. Closing the K1 and K2 shafts are key pieces of the transition to the K3 shaft, but the timeline for the closure was accelerated by approximately nine months. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, we recognized pre-tax costs of $158.1 million related to the permanent closure of these facilities. We have begun the process to resume production at our previously idled Colonsay potash mine to offset a portion of the production lost by the early closure of the K1 and K2 shafts at Esterhazy. We have recalled approximately 160 workers at the site and expect production to begin in the third quarter

of 2021. We expect the K1 and K2 closures, as partially offset by the reopening of the Colonsay mine and ramp up of the K3 shaft, will result in lower net sales volumes of approximately 500,000 tonnes of potash in 2021.

•On June 24, 2021, we announced that we submitted an early redemption notice to the trustee of our $450 million 3.75 percent senior notes. The notes, which mature on November 15, 2021, are expected to be called at par on August 15, 2021.

~~Overview of Consolidated Results for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020~~

Net earnings attributable to Mosaic for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was $593.9 million, or $1.55 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $(155.6) million, or $(0.41) per diluted share, for the same period a year ago. :

Results for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 reflected the factors discussed above in the discussion for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, in addition to those noted below. Certain of these factors are discussed in more detail in the following sections of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Operating results in our Phosphates segment for the six months ended June 30, 2021 were favorably impacted by higher phosphate average selling prices compared to the prior year period. These results were driven by the factors mentioned above in the three-month discussion. Operating results in the current year period were unfavorably impacted by lower finished product sales volumes, and higher raw material costs in the current year period, as discussed above in the three-month discussion. Current year operating results were also unfavorably impacted by higher idle plant and maintenance turnaround costs compared to the prior year.

Operating results in our Potash segment for the six months ended June 30, 2021 were favorably impacted by an increase in the average selling price of potash compared to the prior year period, partially offset by lower sales volumes. These results were driven by the factors mentioned above in the three-month discussion.

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, operating results in our Mosaic Fertilizantes segment were favorably impacted by an increase in average sales prices in the current year compared to the prior year period, driven by strong market demand and tight supply.~~These results were partially offset by the unfavorable impact of lower sales volumes and increased raw materials costs, as discussed above in the three-month discussion.~~

~~In addition to the items noted above, the results for the six months ended June 30, 2021 were negatively impacted by $104 million pre-tax, or $0.19 per share due to the following notable items:~~

•~~Expense related to the closure of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine of $158 million, or $(0.30) per diluted share~~

•~~Depreciation expense of $37 million, or $(0.08) per diluted share, related to the acceleration of the closure of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan mine as we ramp up K3~~

•~~Other operating expenses of $33 million, or $(0.05)~~$(0.03) per diluted share, related to maintaining closed and indefinitely idled facilities in Florida, and fixed asset ~~retirement obligations~~write-offs

•~~Functional currency impact in cost~~Asset retirement obligation costs of ~~goods sold of $6~~$9 million, or ~~$(0.01) per diluted share~~

•~~Other operating income of $20 million, or $0.04~~$(0.02) per diluted share, related to upwards revisions in the ~~sale~~estimated costs of our ~~warehouse~~asset retirement obligations for closed facilities

Other Highlights

•On February 24, 2022, pursuant to existing stock repurchase authorizations, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement with a third-party financial institution to repurchase $400 million of our Common Stock. During the quarter ended March 31, 2022, we repurchased 7,589,664 shares of Common Stock in ~~Houston, Texas~~the open market under the 2021 Repurchase Program for approximately $422.1 million. This includes 7,056,229 shares we purchased under the ASR agreement. In the second quarter of 2022, the ASR agreement was completed and we paid the financial institution an additional $54.2 million, bringing the total amount paid by us under the ASR to $454.2 million, for an average purchase price of $64.37 per share.

•~~Foreign currency transaction gain~~In the first quarter of ~~$65 million, or $0.12 per diluted~~2022, our Board of Directors approved the establishment of a new $1 billion share repurchase authorization, which will go into effect following completion of the current program.

•~~Unrealized gain on derivatives~~Our Board of ~~$30 million, or $0.06~~Directors approved a regular dividend increase to $0.60 per ~~diluted~~ share

•~~Other operating income~~ annually from $0.45, beginning with the second quarter of ~~$11 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, for recovery of a reserve related to the acquisition of Vale Fertilizantes S.A. (now known as Mosaic Fetilizantes P&K S.A. or the "Acquired Business~~")

•~~Other non-operating income of $4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, related to a realized gain on RCRA trust securities~~2022.

3229


Table of Contents

~~Other Highlights~~

•~~In 2020, we filed petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce~~ (“~~DOC~~”) ~~and the U.S. International Trade Commission~~ (“~~ITC~~”) that requested the initiation of countervailing duty investigations into imports of phosphate fertilizers from Morocco and Russia. The purpose of the petitions was to remedy the distortions that we believe foreign subsidies have caused or are causing in the U.S. market for phosphate fertilizers, and thereby restore fair competition. On February 16, 2021, the DOC made final affirmative determinations that countervailable subsidies were being provided by those governments. On March 11, 2021, the ITC made final affirmative determinations that the U.S. phosphate fertilizer industry is materially injured by reason of subsidized phosphate fertilizer imports from Morocco and Russia. As a result of these determinations, the DOC issued countervailing duty orders on phosphate fertilizer imports from Russia and Morocco, which are scheduled to remain in place for at least five years. Currently, the cash deposit rates for such imports are approximately 20 percent for Moroccan producer OCP, 9 percent and 47 percent for Russian producers PhosAgro and Eurochem, respectively, and 17 percent for all other Russian producers. The final determinations in the DOC and ITC investigations are subject to challenge before U.S. federal courts and the World Trade Organization. Mosaic has initiated actions at the U.S. Court of International Trade contesting certain aspects of the DOC's final determinations that, we believe, failed to capture the full extent of Moroccan and Russian phosphate fertilizer subsidies. Moroccan and Russian producers have also initiated U.S. Court of International Trade actions, seeking lower cash deposit rates and revocation of the countervailing duty orders. Further, the cash deposit rates and the amount of countervailing duties owed by importers on such imports could change based on the results of the litigation as well as DOC's annual administrative review proceedings.

•~~In March 2021, we announced an increase in our annual dividend target to $0.30 from $0.20 per share.~~


~~Table of Contents~~

~~Phosphates~~Phosphate Net Sales and Gross Margin

The following table summarizes the ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment’s net sales, gross margin, sales volume, selling prices and raw material prices:


		Three months ended										Six months ended											Three months ended
		June 30,						2021-2020				June 30,						2021-2020					March 31,						2022-2021
(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	2021			2020			Change		Percent		2021			2020			Change		Percent		(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	2022			2021			Change		Percent
Net sales:	Net sales:																					Net sales:
North America	North America	$	746.5		$	383.0		$	363.5	95	%	$	1,472.2		$	764.7		$	707.5	93	%	North America	$	1,004.4		$	725.7		$	278.7	38	%
International	International	428.3			379.4			48.9		13	%	703.6			617.1			86.5		14	%	International	491.6			275.3			216.3		79	%
Total	Total	1,174.8			762.4			412.4		54	%	2,175.8			1,381.8			794.0		57	%	Total	1,496.0			1,001.0			495.0		49	%
Cost of goods sold	Cost of goods sold	866.3			744.7			121.6		16	%	1,694.7			1,447.0			247.7		17	%	Cost of goods sold	968.3			828.4			139.9		17	%
Gross margin	Gross margin	$	308.5		$	17.7		$	290.8	NM		$	481.1		$	(65.2)		$	546.3	NM		Gross margin	$	527.7		$	172.6		$	355.1	NM
Gross margin as a percentage of net sales	Gross margin as a percentage of net sales	26		%	2		%					22		%	(5)		%					Gross margin as a percentage of net sales	35		%	17		%
Sales volumes(a) (in thousands of metric tonnes)	Sales volumes(a) (in thousands of metric tonnes)																					Sales volumes(a) (in thousands of metric tonnes)
DAP/MAP	DAP/MAP	880			1,166			(286)		(25)	%	2,090			2,498			(408)		(16)	%	DAP/MAP	917			1,210			(293)		(24)	%
Performance and Other(b)	Performance and Other(b)	1,102			1,069			33		3	%	1,954			1,656			298		18	%	Performance and Other(b)	744			852			(108)		(13)	%
Total finished product tonnes	Total finished product tonnes	1,982			2,235			(253)		(11)	%	4,044			4,154			(110)		(3)	%	Total finished product tonnes	1,661			2,062			(401)		(19)	%
Rock	Rock	274			119			155		130	%	539			288			251		87	%	Rock	460			265			195		74	%
Total Phosphates Segment Tonnes(a)		2,256			2,354			(98)		(4)	%	4,583			4,442			141		3	%
Total Phosphate Segment Tonnes(a)																						Total Phosphate Segment Tonnes(a)	2,121			2,327			(206)		(9)	%
Realized prices ($/tonne)	Realized prices ($/tonne)																					Realized prices ($/tonne)
Average finished product selling price (destination)~~(a)~~(c)	Average finished product selling price (destination)~~(a)~~(c)	$	584		$	338		$	246	73	%	$	530		$	328		$	202	62	%	Average finished product selling price (destination)~~(a)~~(c)	$	877		$	477		$	400	84	%
DAP selling price (fob plant)	DAP selling price (fob plant)	$	544		$	287		$	257	90	%	$	474		$	281		$	193	69	%	DAP selling price (fob plant)	$	785		$	426		$	359	84	%

Average cost per unit consumed in cost of goods sold:	Average cost per unit consumed in cost of goods sold:																					Average cost per unit consumed in cost of goods sold:
Ammonia (metric tonne)	Ammonia (metric tonne)	$	382		$	289		$	93	32	%	$	348		$	298		$	50	17	%	Ammonia (metric tonne)	$	532		$	316		$	216	68	%
Sulfur (long ton)	Sulfur (long ton)	$	172		$	76		$	96	126	%	$	145		$	77		$	68	88	%	Sulfur (long ton)	$	281		$	119		$	162	136	%
Blended rock (metric tonne)	Blended rock (metric tonne)	$	60		$	61		$	(1)	(2)	%	$	60		$	61		$	(1)	(2)	%	Blended rock (metric tonne)	$	61		$	61		$	—	0	%
Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes) - North America	Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes) - North America	1,827			2,117			(290)		(14)	%	3,737			3,978			(241)		(6)	%	Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes) - North America	1,745			1,911			(166)		(9)	%

____________________________

(a) Includes intersegment sales volumes.

(b) Includes sales volumes of ~~MicroEssentials®~~MicroEssentials® and animal feed ingredients.

(c)Excludes sales revenue and tonnes associated with rock sales.

Three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 ~~and June 30, 2020~~

The ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment’s net sales were ~~$1.2~~$1.5 billion for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$0.8~~$1.0 billion for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. The increase in net sales in the current year period was primarily due to favorable sales prices, which had an impact of approximately ~~$470~~$600 million compared to the prior year period. Increased sales of other products, primarily ammonia and sulfur, favorably impacted net sales by approximately $60 million. This was partially offset by lower phosphate sales volumes, which had an unfavorable impact on net sales of approximately ~~$60~~$160 million compared to the prior year period.

Our average finished product selling price increased ~~73%~~84% to ~~$584~~$877 per tonne for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$338~~$477 per tonne in the prior year period, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

The Phosphate segment’s sales volumes of finished products decreased by 19% for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

3430


Table of Contents

The Phosphates segment’s sales volumes of finished products decreased by 11% for the three months ended June 30, 2021, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

Gross margin for the ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment increased to ~~$308.5~~$527.7 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, from ~~$17.7~~$172.6 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. The increase in gross margin in the current year period was primarily due to significantly higher sales prices, which favorably impacted gross margin by approximately ~~$430~~$590 million, increased sales of sulfur and ammonia of approximately $30 million and increased margin on Miski Mayo sales of approximately $10 million, compared to the prior year period. This was partially offset by an unfavorable impact of approximately ~~$110~~$160 million from increased raw material prices, largely driven by sulfur asand ammonia. Lower sales volumes unfavorably impacted gross margin by approximately $60 million due to factors discussed in the Overview. The increase in gross margin was also partially offset by the unfavorable impact of approximately ~~$20 million due to the timing of turnarounds, and approximately $10~~$30 million due to increased conversion costs which were caused by ~~lower production volumes due to sulfur availability issues.~~the composition of rock and higher maintenance costs.

The average consumed price for ammonia for our North ~~American~~America operations increased to ~~$382~~$532 per tonne for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, from ~~$289~~$316 in the same period a year ago. We typically purchase approximately one-third of our ammonia from various suppliers in the spot market, with the remaining two-thirds either purchased through an ammonia supply agreement or produced internally at our Faustina, Louisiana location. The average consumed sulfur price for our North ~~American~~America operations increased by more than 100% to ~~$172~~$281 per long ton for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, from ~~$76~~$119 in the same period a year ago. The purchase prices of these raw materials are driven by global supply and demand. The consumed ammonia and sulfur prices also include transportation, transformation and storage costs.

The average consumed cost of purchased and produced phosphate rock ~~decreased slightly to $60 per tonne for the three months ended June 30, 2021, compared to~~was $61 per tonne for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2022, and March 31, 2021. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our North ~~American~~America phosphate rock production decreased to ~~2.8~~2.1 million tonnes from ~~3.3~~3.0 million tonnes ~~for~~during the same period of the prior year, due to geology of rock and operational challenges as we transition into new mining areas. Production at our Miski Mayo mine in Peru has returned to more normal levels compared to the prior year period, when operations were suspended for a portion of the quarter due to a government mandate shut-down related to Covid-19 restrictions.

The Phosphates segment's production of crop nutrient dry concentrates and animal feed ingredients decreased to 1.8 million tonnes for the three months ended June 30, 2021, compared to 2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. Production volume reflects sulfur availability issues experienced in the current period. Our operating rate for processed phosphate production decreased to 73% for the three months ended June 30, 2021, from 85% for the same period in 2020.

~~Six months ended June 30, 2021 and June 30, 2020~~

The Phosphates segment’s net sales were $2.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $1.4 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in net sales was primarily due to higher selling prices in the current year period, which favorably impacted net sales by approximately $760 million compared to the prior year period. Net sales was also favorably impacted by approximately $30 million due to sales of excess ammonia in the current year period.

Our average finished product selling price was $530 per tonne for the six months ended June 30, 2021, an increase of 62% per tonne from the same period a year ago, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

The Phosphates segment’s sales volumes of finished products decreased by 3% for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to the same period in the prior year ago, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

Gross margin for the Phosphates segment increased to $481.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, from $(65.2) million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in gross margin in the current year period was primarily due to the impact of higher finished product prices of approximately $730 million compared to the prior year. This was partially offset by higher raw material costs as discussed below, impacting gross margin by approximately $140 million, and higher costs of approximately $30 million which related to the timing of idle plant and turnaround costs in the current year period. Gross margin was also unfavorably impacted by approximately $10 million, due to lower sales volumes.

The average consumed price for ammonia for our North American operations was $348 per tonne for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $298 in the same period a year ago. The average consumed price for sulfur for our North American operations increased to $145 per long ton for the six months ended June 30, 2021, from $77 in the same period a year ago. The purchase prices of these raw materials are driven by global supply and demand.


~~Table of Contents~~

The average consumed cost of purchased and produced phosphate rock decreased slightly to $60 per tonne for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $61 per tonne for the prior year period. Our North American phosphate rock production decreased to 5.8 million tonnes for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to 6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The decrease from the prior year is due to operational challenges as we transition into new mining areas.challenges.

The Phosphate segment’s production of crop nutrient dry concentrates and animal feed ingredients decreased to ~~3.7~~1.7 million tonnes for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~4.0~~1.9 million ~~tonnes in~~for the ~~prior year period, due to sulfur availability issues in the current year. For the six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021, our~~March 31, 2021. Our operating rate for processed phosphate production decreased to ~~75%, compared to 80% in~~70% for the three months ended March 31, 2022, from 77% for the same period ~~of the prior year.~~in 2021.

Potash Net Sales and Gross Margin

The following table summarizes the Potash segment’s net sales, gross margin, sales volume and selling price:


		Three months ended										Six months ended											Three months ended
		June 30,						2021-2020				June 30,						2021-2020					March 31,						2022-2021
(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	2021			2020			Change		Percent		2021			2020			Change		Percent		(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	2022			2021			Change		Percent
Net sales:	Net sales:																					Net sales:
North America	North America	$	456.6		$	315.2		$	141.4	45	%	$	770.4		$	597.7		$	172.7	29	%	North America	$	530.1		$	313.9		$	216.2	69	%
International	International	206.4			240.2			(33.8)		(14)	%	370.0			399.3			(29.3)		(7)	%	International	529.7			163.5			366.2		NM
Total	Total	663.0			555.4			107.6		19	%	1,140.4			997.0			143.4		14	%	Total	1,059.8			477.4			582.4		122	%
Cost of goods sold	Cost of goods sold	445.8			423.8			22.0		5	%	783.0			756.3			26.7		4	%	Cost of goods sold	480.9			337.2			143.7		43	%
Gross margin	Gross margin	$	217.2		$	131.6		$	85.6	65	%	$	357.4		$	240.7		$	116.7	48	%	Gross margin	$	578.9		$	140.2		$	438.7	NM
Gross margin as a percentage of net sales	Gross margin as a percentage of net sales	33		%	24		%					31		%	24		%					Gross margin as a percentage of net sales	55		%	29		%

Sales volume(a) (in thousands of metric tonnes)	Sales volume(a) (in thousands of metric tonnes)																					Sales volume(a) (in thousands of metric tonnes)
MOP	MOP	2,064			2,282			(218)		(10)	%	3,811			3,991			(180)		(5)	%	MOP	1,532			1,747			(215)		(12)	%
Performance and Other(b)	Performance and Other(b)	262			277			(15)		(5)	%	495			467			28		6	%	Performance and Other(b)	260			233			27		12	%
Total Potash Segment Tonnes	Total Potash Segment Tonnes	2,326			2,559			(233)		(9)	%	4,306			4,458			(152)		(3)	%	Total Potash Segment Tonnes	1,792			1,980			(188)		(9)	%
Realized prices ($/tonne)	Realized prices ($/tonne)																					Realized prices ($/tonne)
Average finished product selling price (destination)	Average finished product selling price (destination)	$	285		$	217		$	68	31	%	$	265		$	224		$	41	18	%	Average finished product selling price (destination)	$	591		$	241		$	350	145	%
MOP selling price (fob mine)	MOP selling price (fob mine)	$	243		$	182		$	61	34	%	$	223		$	188		$	35	19	%	MOP selling price (fob mine)	$	582		$	200		$	382	191	%
Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	2,131			2,198			(67)		(3)	%	4,416			4,266			150		4	%	Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	2,200			2,285			(85)		(4)	%


Table of Contents

(a) Includes intersegment sales volumes.

(b) Includes sales volumes of K-mag, Aspire and animal feed ingredients.

Three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 ~~and June 30, 2020~~

The Potash segment’s net sales increased to ~~$663.0~~$1,059.8 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$555.4~~$477.4 million in the same period a year ago. The increase was due to higher selling prices, which had a favorable impact on net sales of approximately ~~$145~~$620 million, compared to the same period in the prior year. This was partially offset by lower sales volumes compared to the prior year, which unfavorably impacted net sales by approximately $40 million.

Our average finished product selling price was ~~$285~~$591 per tonne for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$217~~$241 per tonne for the same period a year ago, as a result of the factors described in the Overview.

The Potash segment’s sales volumes of finished products decreased to ~~2.3~~1.8 million tonnes for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~2.6~~2.0 million tonnes in the same period a year ago, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

Gross margin for the Potash segment increased to ~~$217.2~~$578.9 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, from ~~$131.6~~$140.2 million in the same period of the prior year. The increase in gross margin in the current year period is primarily due to an increase in selling prices, which contributed approximately ~~$145~~$620 million to gross margin, compared to the prior year period.


~~Table of Contents~~

This was partially offset by an unfavorable impact of approximately ~~$25~~$20 million due to lower sales volumes in the current year period. In addition, the current year period was unfavorably impacted by ~~approximately $35 million from~~ higher ~~fixed cost absorption,~~Canadian resource taxes and royalties, as discussed below. Gross margin was also unfavorably impacted by higher idle costs and other plant spending, due to ~~lower production and higher~~ maintenance and ~~turnaround costs, and foreign currency impacts,~~repairs, of approximately $20 million, compared to the prior year period.

We had expense of ~~$54.3~~$157.2 million from Canadian resource taxes for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$52.1~~$35.0 million in the same period a year ago. Canadian royalty expense increased to ~~$10.0~~$27.0 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$7.8~~$8.5 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. The fluctuations in Canadian resource taxes and royalties are a result of an increase in our sales revenue and margins.

We incurred $19 million in brine inflow management expenses, including depreciation on brine assets, at our Esterhazy mine during the three months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $26 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The reduced costs in 2021 are a reflection of the accelerated closure of the K1 and K2 shafts at Esterhazy. On June 4, 2021, due to increased brine inflows, we made the decision to immediately close ~~these shafts, which will eliminate future brine inflow management expenses at~~ the K1 and K2 ~~shafts. We remain on track in our development of the K3 shaft~~shafts at our Esterhazy mine, which ~~is expected~~eliminated future brine inflow management expenses. Therefore, we did not incur any brine inflow management expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to ~~reach full operational capacity~~$23 million in brine inflow management expenses, including depreciation on brine assets, during the ~~second quarter of 2022.~~three months ended March 31, 2021.

Our operating rate for potash production was ~~88%~~80% for the current year period, compared to ~~91%~~94% in the prior year period. The decreased operating rate in the current year period reflects the ~~timing of maintenance turnarounds at our mines and the~~ shutdown of our K1 and K2 shafts at our Esterhazy ~~mine.~~

~~Six months ended June 30, 2021~~mine and ~~June 30, 2020~~

~~The Potash segment’s net sales increased to $1.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $1.0 billion in the same period a year ago. The increase was~~forced containment at our Belle Plaine and Colonsay mines, due to ~~higher selling prices, which had a favorable impact on net sales~~logistical challenges caused by rail cycle times. Production is expected to increase during the remainder of ~~approximately $150 million, partially offset by lower sales volumes, which had an unfavorable impact on net sales of approximately $5 million.~~

~~Our average selling price was $265 per tonne for~~2022, as the ~~six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $224 per tonne for the same period a year ago, due to the factors discussed above in the Overview.~~

The Potash segment’s sales volumes decreased to 4.3 million tonnes for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to 4.5 million tonnes in the same period a year ago, due to the factors discussed in the Overview.

Gross margin for the Potash segment increased to $357.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, from $240.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Gross margin was favorably impacted by approximately $150 million, due to the increase in average selling prices, partially offset by approximately $5 million, due to the impact of lower sales volumes. Gross margin was unfavorably impacted by higher maintenance turnaround costs of approximately $15 million, due to the timing of when turnarounds occurred, and approximately $10 million of foreign currency impacts in the current year period compared to the prior year period.

We incurred $89.2 million in Canadian resource taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $83.8 million in the same period a year ago. Canadian royalty expense increased to $18.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The fluctuations in Canadian resource taxes and royalties are due to higher average selling prices and margins in the current year period compared to the prior year.

~~We incurred expense of $42 million, including depreciation on brine assets, related to managing the brine inflows~~K3 shaft at our Esterhazy mine ~~during the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $59 million~~reached full operational capacity in ~~the prior year period.~~early April 2022 and as containment is alleviated at our Belle Plaine and Colonsay mines.

~~Our operating rate was 91% for the current year period, compared to 88% in the prior year period, due to increased production in the first quarter of the current year period.~~

3732


Table of Contents

Mosaic Fertilizantes Net Sales and Gross Margin

The following table summarizes the Mosaic Fertilizantes segment’s net sales, gross margin, sales volume and selling price.


		Three months ended										Six months ended											Three months ended
		June 30,						2021-2020				June 30,						2021-2020					March 31,						2022-2021
(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	2021			2020			Change		Percent		2021			2020			Change		Percent		(in millions, except price per tonne or unit)	2022			2021			Change		Percent
Net Sales	Net Sales	$	1,035.7		$	787.0		$	248.8	32	%	$	1,799.2		$	1,518.1		$	281.1	19	%	Net Sales	$	1,488.6		$	763.4		$	725.2	95	%
Cost of goods sold	Cost of goods sold	850.7			686.3			164.4		24	%	1,511.0			1,350.9			160.1		12	%	Cost of goods sold	1,269.3			660.3			609.0		92	%
Gross margin	Gross margin	$	185.1		$	100.7		$	84.4	84	%	$	288.2		$	167.2		$	121.0	72	%	Gross margin	$	219.3		$	103.1		$	116.2	113	%
Gross margin as a percent of net sales	Gross margin as a percent of net sales	18		%	13		%					16		%	11		%					Gross margin as a percent of net sales	15		%	14		%
Sales volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	Sales volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)																					Sales volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)
Phosphate produced in Brazil(a)	Phosphate produced in Brazil(a)	686			1,161			(475)		(41)	%	1,222			1,860			(638)		(34)	%	Phosphate produced in Brazil(a)	737			536			201		38	%
Potash produced in Brazil	Potash produced in Brazil	66			71			(5)		(7)	%	129			146			(17)		(12)	%	Potash produced in Brazil	46			63			(17)		(27)	%
Purchased nutrients for distribution	Purchased nutrients for distribution	1,589			1,326			263		20	%	3,054			2,629			425		16	%	Purchased nutrients for distribution	1,039			1,465			(426)		(29)	%
Total Mosaic Fertilizantes Segment Tonnes	Total Mosaic Fertilizantes Segment Tonnes	2,341			2,558			(217)		(8)	%	4,405			4,635			(230)		(5)	%	Total Mosaic Fertilizantes Segment Tonnes	1,822			2,064			(242)		(12)	%
Realized prices ($/tonne)	Realized prices ($/tonne)																					Realized prices ($/tonne)
Average finished product selling price (destination)	Average finished product selling price (destination)	$	442		$	308		$	134	44	%	$	408		$	328		$	80	24	%	Average finished product selling price (destination)	$	817		$	370		$	447	121	%
Brazil MAP price (delivered price to third party)	Brazil MAP price (delivered price to third party)	$	589		$	314		$	275	88	%	$	521		$	322		$	199	62	%	Brazil MAP price (delivered price to third party)	$	882		$	421		$	461	110	%
Purchases ('000 tonnes)	Purchases ('000 tonnes)																					Purchases ('000 tonnes)
DAP/MAP from Mosaic	DAP/MAP from Mosaic	96			193			(97)		(50)	%	160			347			(187)		(54)	%	DAP/MAP from Mosaic	102			64			38		59	%
MicroEssentials® from Mosaic	MicroEssentials® from Mosaic	418			407			11		3	%	621			524			97		19	%	MicroEssentials® from Mosaic	248			203			45		22	%
Potash from Mosaic/Canpotex	Potash from Mosaic/Canpotex	473			708			(235)		(33)	%	962			1,001			(39)		(4)	%	Potash from Mosaic/Canpotex	398			489			(91)		(19)	%
Average cost per unit consumed in cost of goods sold:	Average cost per unit consumed in cost of goods sold:																					Average cost per unit consumed in cost of goods sold:
Ammonia (metric tonne)	Ammonia (metric tonne)	$	527		$	327		$	200	61	%	$	453		$	340		$	113	33	%	Ammonia (metric tonne)	$	1,145		$	381		$	764	201	%
Sulfur (long ton)	Sulfur (long ton)	$	177		$	100		$	77	77	%	$	153		$	106		$	47	44	%	Sulfur (long ton)	$	337		$	124		$	213	172	%
Blended rock (metric tonne)	Blended rock (metric tonne)	$	80		$	67		$	13	19	%	$	77		$	71		$	6	8	%	Blended rock (metric tonne)	$	105		$	73		$	32	44	%
Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	893			1,078			(185)		(17)	%	1,778			2,032			(254)		(13)	%	Production volume (in thousands of metric tonnes)	989			885			104		12	%

(a) Excludes internally produced volumes used in purchased nutrients for distribution.

Three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 ~~and June 30, 2020~~

The Mosaic Fertilizantes segment’s net sales increased to ~~$1.0~~$1.5 billion for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, from $0.8 billion in the same period a year ago. The increase in net sales was due to higher finished product sales prices, which favorably impacted net sales by approximately ~~$240~~$690 million. This was partially offset by lower finished goods sales volumes, which had an unfavorable impact of approximately ~~$60~~$80 million. Net sales were also favorably impacted by increased sales prices and volumes of other products, primarily gypsum, magnetite and sulfuric acid, of approximately ~~$60~~$110 million.

Our average finished product selling price was ~~$442~~$817 per tonne for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$308~~$370 per tonne for the same period a year ago, due to the increase in global sales prices ~~favorable market conditions and~~as discussed in the ~~mix of products sold.~~Overview.

The Mosaic Fertilizantes segment’s sales volumes of finished products decreased 8%12% for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to the same period a year ago. Sales volumes were impacted by ~~limited available inventories combined with~~ lower ~~operating rates as well as~~demand primarily caused by adverse weather conditions in certain areas of Brazil.

Gross margin for the ~~sale~~Mosaic Fertilizantes segment increased to $219.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, from $103.1 million in the same period of ~~produced product through our own distribution system.~~the prior year. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to a favorable impact

3833


Table of Contents

~~Gross margin for the Mosaic Fertilizantes segment~~ ~~increased to $185.1 million~~ ~~for the three months ended June 30, 2021, from $100.7 million in the same period of the prior year. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to a favorable impact~~ of approximately ~~$140~~$690 million related to the increase in selling prices during the current year period compared to the prior year period. Increased sales prices and volumes of other products, primarily ~~gypsum and~~ sulfuric acid, also favorably impacted gross margin by approximately ~~$20~~$30 million. An increase in product costs, primarily material purchases by our distribution business, and increases in other production costs had an unfavorable impact on gross margin of approximately $590 million, compared to the prior year period. Lower finished goods sales volumes also unfavorably impacted gross margin by approximately $10 million compared to the prior year period. ~~An increase~~

The average consumed price for ammonia for our Brazilian operations increased 201% to $1,145 per tonne for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $381 per tonne in ~~raw material costs, primarily rock, ammonia and~~the prior year period. The average consumed sulfur ~~had an unfavorable impact on gross margin of approximately $40 million,~~price for our Brazilian operations was $337 per long ton for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $124 per long ton in the prior year period. The purchase prices of ammonia and sulfur are driven by global supply and ~~demand. Gross margin was~~demand, and also ~~negatively impacted by higher production costs of approximately $20 million in the current year period, due to inflationary pressure, higher maintenance costs~~include transportation, transformation and ~~lower production volumes compared to the prior year period.~~storage costs.

The Mosaic Fertilizantes segment's production of crop nutrient dry concentrates and animal feed ~~ingredient~~s ~~decreased~~ ~~17%, to0.9 million tonnes,~~ingredients increased 12% for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021, from 1.1 million tonnes in~~March 31, 2022, compared to the prior year period. For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our phosphate operating rate ~~decreased~~increased to ~~72%~~92%, compared to ~~88%~~82% in the same period of the prior year. Current year production was favorably impacted by ~~unplanned maintenance downtime and processing lower quality ore compared to the prior year period.~~stable operating conditions.

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, our Brazilian phosphate rock production decreased slightly to 0.9 million tonnes, from 1.0 million tonnes ~~from 1.1 million tonnes~~ for ~~the prior year period.~~

~~Six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020~~

~~The Mosaic Fertilizantes segment’s net sales were $1.8 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $1.5 billion in the prior year period. In the current period,~~ net sales were favorably impacted by approximately $250 million due to higher finished goods sales prices, partially offset by the impact of lower finished goods sales volumes of approximately $50 million. Net sales were also favorably impacted by higher sales prices and volumes of other product, primarily gypsum and sulfur acid, of approximately $80 million compared to the prior year period.

The average finished product selling price increased $80 per tonne to $408 per tonne for the six months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $328 per tonne in the prior year period, primarily due to the increase in global prices mentioned in the Overview.

The Mosaic Fertilizantes segment’s sales volume decreased to 4.4 million tonnes for the six months ended June 30, 2021, from 4.6 million tonnes in the same period a year ago, due to factors discussed above in the three-month discussion.

Total gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2021, increased to $288.2 million from $167.2 million in the same period in the prior year. In the current year period, gross margin was favorably impacted by favorable sales prices of approximately $190 million. Gross margin was negatively impacted by lower sales volumes of approximately $10 million and higher raw materials costs of approximately $60 million in the current year period compared to the prior year. Higher production costs at our facilities due to lower production volumes and higher maintenance costs resulted in an unfavorable gross margin impact of approximately $20 million. Gross margin was also positively impacted by favorable foreign currency impacts of approximately $20 million.

The Mosaic Fertilizantes segment’s production of crop nutrient dry concentrates and animal feed ingredients decreased 13% to 1.8 million tonnes for the six months ended June 30, 2021, from 2.0 million tonnes in the prior year period. The lower production in the current year was due to the unplanned maintenance down time and lower quality ore compared to the prior year period. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, our phosphate operating rate was 74%, compared to 84% in the same period of the prior year.

~~For the six month period ended June 30, 2021, our Brazilian phosphate rock production decreased slightly to 2.0 million tonnes, from 2.1 million tonnes in~~ the prior year period.

Corporate, Eliminations and Other

In addition to our three operating segments, we assign certain costs to Corporate, Eliminations and Other, which is presented separately in Note 1617 to our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Corporate, Eliminations and Other includes the results of the China and India distribution businesses, intersegment eliminations, including profit on intersegment sales, unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on derivatives, debt expenses and Streamsong Resort® results of operations.


~~Table of Contents~~

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, gross margin for Corporate, Eliminations and Other was ~~$41.5~~$113.2 million, compared to ~~$7.0~~$19.0 million for the same period in the prior year. The change was driven by distribution operations in India and China, which had revenue of $180.0 million and gross margin of $42.7 million in the current year period, compared to revenue of $161.5 million and gross margin of $20.0 million in the prior year period. The ~~increases in revenue and gross margin were due to higher agriculture commodity prices and tight supply of phosphate and potash in the current year period.~~ Gross margin was ~~also positively~~favorably impacted by a net unrealized gain of $38.0 million in the current year period, primarily on foreign currency derivatives, compared to a net unrealized gain of $9.2 million in the prior year period. Results were negatively impacted by a higher elimination of profit on intersegment sales in the current year period, which reduced the change from the prior year by approximately $26.2million.

~~For the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2021, gross margin for Corporate, Eliminations and Other was~~ ~~$60.5 million, compared to a loss of $44.3 million for the same period in the prior year.~~ The change was driven by distribution operations in India and China, which had revenue of $339.6 million and gross margin of $72.9 million in the current year period, compared to revenue of $238.3 million and gross margin of $22.0 million in the prior year period. The increases in revenue and gross margin was due higher agriculture commodity prices and tight supply of phosphate and potash in the current year period. Gross margin was also positively impacted by a net unrealized gain of $29.9$99.8 million in the current year period, primarily on foreign currency derivatives, compared to a net unrealized loss of ~~$41.6~~$8.1 million in the prior year period. ~~Results were negatively~~Gross margin was also positively impacted by adistribution operations in China and India, which had revenue of $220.9 million and gross margin of $87.0 million in the current year period, compared to revenue of $159.6 million and gross margin of $30.3 million in the prior year period. These impacts were partially offset by higher elimination of profit on intersegment sales in the current year period, which ~~reduced the change~~changed from the prior year period by approximately ~~$31.0~~$73.5 million.

Other Income Statement Items

Three months ended Six months ended
June 30, 2021-2020 June 30, 2021-2020
(in millions) 2021 2020 Change Percent 2021 2020 Change Percent
Selling, general and administrative expenses $ 107.6 $ 95.1 $ 12.5 13 % $ 209.3 $ 163.0 $ 46.3 28 %
Mine closure costs 158.1 — 158.1 NM 158.1 — 158.1 NM
Other operating expense 2.6 76.1 (73.5) (97) % 22.6 115.8 (93.2) (80) %
Interest expense (43.8) (57.0) 13.2 (23) % (93.2) (107.8) 14.6 (14) %
Interest income 6.5 7.7 (1.2) (16) % 10.9 17.4 (6.5) (37) %
Interest expense, net (37.3) (49.3) 12.0 (24) % (82.3) (90.4) 8.1 (9) %
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss) 111.1 34.1 77.0 NM 65.3 (180.1) 245.4 (136) %
Other income 1.4 2.4 (1.0) (42) % 4.4 6.9 (2.5) (36) %
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 115.9 (2.7) 118.6 NM 175.6 (135.7) 311.3 NM
Equity in net (loss) of nonconsolidated companies (4.5) (29.8) 25.3 (85) % (12.0) (49.8) 37.8 (76) %

~~Selling, General and Administrative Expenses~~

~~Selling, general and administrative expenses were $107.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021, compared to $95.1 million in the same period of the prior year.~~ ~~The increase was primarily due to approximately $8 million of higher consulting and professional service expenses related to executing on our strategic priorities,~~ ~~including transformation and technology projects.~~

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $209.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $163.0 million in the same period of the prior year. The increase was due primarily to approximately $45 million of compensation expense related to long-term incentive awards and current year performance factors.


	Three months ended
	March 31,				2022-2021
(in millions)	2022		2021		Change		Percent
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	132.4	$	101.7	$	30.7	30	%


Other operating expense	50.9		20.0		30.9		155	%

Interest expense	(43.9)		(49.4)		5.5		(11)	%
Interest income	4.6		4.4		0.2		5	%
Interest expense, net	(39.3)		(45.0)		5.7		(13)	%
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)	310.7		(45.8)		356.5		NM
Other income	0.2		3.0		(2.8)		(93)	%
Provision for income taxes	372.4		59.7		312.7		NM
Equity in net earnings (loss) of nonconsolidated companies	30.7		(7.5)		38.2		NM

4034


Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

~~Mine Closure Costs~~

~~On June 4, 2021, due to increased brine inflow, we made the decision to accelerate the timing of the shutdown of our K1~~Selling, general and ~~K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine. For~~administrative expenses were $132.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to $101.7 million in the same period of the prior year. The increase was due to approximately $20 million of share based payments in the current year period, and ~~six months ended June 30, 2021, we recognized pre-tax~~approximately $10 million in other costs, ~~of $158.1 million~~primarily related to ~~the permanent closure of these facilities. These costs consisted of $110.0 million~~consulting and professional services related to ~~the write-off of fixed assets, $37.1 million related to asset retirement obligations, and $11.0 million related to inventory and other reserves.~~executing on our strategic initiatives.

Other Operating Expense

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had other operating expenses of ~~$2.6~~$50.9 million, compared to ~~$76.1~~$20.0 million for the same period in the prior year. The three months ended ~~June 30, 2021 include income~~March 31, 2022 included an increase of approximately ~~$20~~$9 million related to ~~a gain on selling a warehouse. The prior year includes~~revisions in estimated closure costs for our asset retirement obligations at our closed facilities and an increase of approximately ~~$50~~$10 million related to ~~asset retirement obligation expense for our closed Plant City, Florida, due to new regulations.~~

~~For the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2021, we had other operating expenses of $22.6 million,~~environmental reserves compared to ~~$115.8 million for the~~

~~same period in~~ the prior ~~year. In addition to the items mentioned above in the three-month discussion, the~~year period . The current year period ~~includes income~~also included a loss on fixed asset disposals of approximately $11 ~~million related to the recovery of a reserve for the Acquired Business.~~million.

Foreign Currency Transaction Gain (Loss)

We recorded foreign currency transaction gains of ~~$111.1 million and $65.3~~$310.7 million for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2021, respectively,~~March 31, 2022, compared to a ~~gain of $34.1 million and a~~ loss of ~~$180.1~~$45.8 million for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, the ~~gains were~~gain was the result of the effect of the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the ~~Canadian dollar on significant U.S. dollar-denominated intercompany loans and the weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to the~~ Brazilian real on ~~significant~~ U.S. dollar-denominated payables held by our Brazilian ~~subsidiaries.~~subsidiaries and on significant intercompany loans.

Equity in Net Earnings (Loss) ~~Earnings~~ of Nonconsolidated Companies

For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had equity in net ~~loss~~earnings of nonconsolidated companies of ~~$4.5~~$30.7 million ~~and $12.0 million, respectively,~~ compared to equity in net loss of nonconsolidated companies of ~~$29.8 million and $49.8~~$7.5 million for the same ~~periods~~period in the prior year. ~~All of these losses are~~The current year gain was primarily related to the operations ~~at MWSPC.~~of MWSPC, which were favorably impacted by higher phosphate selling prices, and the continued ramp-up of its operations.

Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes

Three months ended Effective Tax Rate Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
June 30, 2021 20.7 % $ 115.9
June 30, 2020 (3.7) % $ (2.7)
Six months ended Effective Tax Rate Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
June 30, 2021 22.4 % $ 175.6
June 30, 2020 55.6 % $ (135.7)


Three months ended	Effective Tax Rate		Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes

March 31, 2022	24.4	%	$	372.4
March 31, 2021	26.5	%	$	59.7

Income tax expense was ~~$115.9 million and $175.6~~$372.4 million and the effective tax rate was ~~20.7% and 22.4%~~24.4% for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

For the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, discrete tax expense ~~specific to the period~~ was a benefit of approximately ~~$49.6~~$9.0 million. This consisted primarily of a share-based excess benefit, relates to various items, including: $42.7 million related to the pretax Esterhazy mine closure costs, $3.1 million related to prior year adjustments, $2.8 million related to prior year non-U.S. reserves,which was partially offset by changes in valuation allowances and other miscellaneous ~~benefits of $1.0 million.~~benefits. In addition to items specific to the period, our income tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings across the jurisdictions in which we operate, by a benefit associated with depletion, by a benefit associated with non-U.S. incentives, by changes in


~~Table of Contents~~

valuation allowances and by the impact of certain entities being taxed in both their foreign jurisdiction ~~and the U.S., including foreign tax credits for various taxes incurred.~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, tax expense specific to the period was a benefit of approximately $45.2 million. This relates to various items including, benefits for the following items: $42.7 million related to the pretax Esterhazy mine closure costs, $1.1 million related to prior year adjustments, $2.8 million recorded related to prior year non-U.S. reserves, and other miscellaneous benefits of $0.6 million. These tax benefits are partially offset by tax expense of $2.0 million related to the write-off of expired stock options. In addition to items specific to the period, our income tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings across the jurisdictions in which we operate, by a benefit associated with depletion, and by the impact of certain entities being taxed in both foreign jurisdictions and the U.S., including foreign tax credits for various taxes incurred.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP. In preparing the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to make various judgments, estimates and assumptions that could have a significant impact on the results reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We base these estimates on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable by management under the circumstances. Changes in these estimates could have a material effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents

The basis for our financial statement presentation, including our significant accounting estimates, is summarized in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. A summary description of our significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 10-K Report. Further detailed information regarding our critical accounting estimates is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition in our 10-K Report.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$1.4~~$0.9 billion, short-term debt of ~~$0.1~~$480.5 million, long-term debt, including current maturities, of approximately ~~$4.5~~$4.0 billion, and stockholders’ equity of approximately ~~$10.5~~$11.8 billion. We have a target liquidity buffer of up to $3.0 billion, including cash and available committed and uncommitted credit lines. We expect our liquidity to fluctuate from time to time, especially in the first quarter of each year, to manage through the seasonality of our business. We also target debt leverage ratios that are consistent with investment grade credit metrics. Our capital allocation priorities include maintaining our target investment grade metrics and financial strength, sustaining our assets, including ensuring the safety and reliability of our assets, investing to grow our business, either through organic growth or taking advantage of strategic opportunities, and returning excess cash to shareholders, including paying our dividend. During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we invested ~~$585.8~~$290.5 million in capital expenditures.

Funds generated by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and our credit facilities continue to be our most significant sources of liquidity. We believe funds generated from the expected results of operations and available cash, cash equivalents and borrowings under our committed and uncommitted credit facilities, as needed, will be sufficient to finance our operations, including our capital expenditures, existing strategic initiatives and expected dividend payments, for the next 12 months. There can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels. As of ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had ~~$2.19~~$2.49 billion available under our ~~$2.20~~$2.50 billion committed revolving credit facility and approximately ~~$500~~$200 million available under our $1.08 billion uncommitted facilities. Our credit facilities, including the revolving credit facility, ~~and our term loans,~~ require us to maintain certain financial ratios, as discussed in Note 10 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 10-K Report. We were in compliance with these ratios as of ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

All of our cash and cash equivalents are diversified in highly rated investment vehicles. Our cash and cash equivalents are held either in the U.S. or held by non-U.S. subsidiaries and are not subject to significant foreign currency exposures, as the majority are held in investments denominated in U.S. dollars as of ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022. These funds may create foreign currency transaction gains or losses, however, depending on the functional currency of the entity holding the cash. In addition, there are no significant restrictions that would preclude us from bringing these funds back to the U.S., aside from withholding taxes.


~~Table of Contents~~

The following table represents a comparison of the net cash provided by operating activities, net cash used in investing activities, and net cash used in or provided by financing activities for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 and ~~June 30, 2020:~~March 31, 2021:


(in millions)	(in millions)	Six months ended								(in millions)	Three months ended
		June 30, 2021				2021-2020					March 31, 2022				2022-2021
Cash Flow	Cash Flow	2021		2020		Change		Percent		Cash Flow	2022		2021		Change		Percent
Net cash provided by operating activities	Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,333.9	$	1,003.6	$	330.3	33	%	Net cash provided by operating activities	$	506.2	$	318.8	$	187.4	59	%
Net cash used in investing activities	Net cash used in investing activities	(579.6)		(527.6)		(52.0)		10	%	Net cash used in investing activities	(297.2)		(308.5)		11.3		(4)	%
Net cash provided by financing activities		39.6		167.6		(128.0)		(76)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities										Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(125.0)		121.7		(246.7)		NM

Operating Activities

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$1.3 billion,~~$506.2 million, compared to ~~$1.0 billion~~$318.8 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021. Our results of operations, after non-cash adjustments to net earnings, contributed ~~$1.1 billion~~$1,145.2 million to cash flows from operating activities during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$546~~$401.8 million as computed on the same basis for the prior year period. During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we had an unfavorable working capital change of ~~$229.7~~$639 million, compared to ~~a favorable~~an unfavorable change of ~~$457.6~~$83.0 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2020.~~March 31, 2021.


Table of Contents

The change in working capital for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, was primarily driven by ~~an increase in inventories of $402.0 million and an increase~~a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of ~~$724.0~~$296.9 million and an increase in inventories of $281.6 million. The decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was primarily related to the timing of payments for inventory purchases in Mosaic Fertilizantes partially offset by an increase in customer prepayments in Brazil. The increase in inventories was primarily due to higher raw material costs in Phosphate and Mosaic Fertilizantes and building inventory volumes, primarily in Brazil, as they prepare for their ~~upcoming high season. The increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was primarily related to an increase in customer prepayments in Brazil in anticipation of the upcoming~~ high season.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was ~~$579.6~~$297.2 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$527.6~~$308.5 million for the same period a year ago. ~~Capital~~We had capital expenditures ~~increased to $585.8~~of $290.5 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, compared to ~~$520.7~~$288.6 million in the prior year ~~period primarily due to the timing of payments. In addition, in the prior year, we deferred certain projects until later in the year due to the Covid-19 outbreak.~~period.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022, was $125.0 million, compared to net cash provided by financing activities ~~for the six months ended June 30, 2021, was $39.6 million, compared to $167.6~~of $121.7 million for the same period in the prior year. ~~For~~During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, we made repurchases of our Common Stock of $422.1 million and paid dividends of $40.6 million. We also made payments on long-term debt of $14.1 million. We received net proceeds from short-term borrowings of $171.1 million, and had net proceeds from structured accounts payable arrangements of ~~$184.8 million, compared to net payments of $336.3 million in the prior year period. We also~~$101.1 million. In addition, we had net collections on behalf of the bank under our Receivable Purchasing Agreement of ~~$28.1~~$71.3 million, which had not yet been remitted to them as of ~~June 30, 2021. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, we made payments on long-term debt of $128.7 million and paid dividends of $47.5 million.~~

The prior year period included net proceeds from short term borrowings of $573.5 million, as we entered into short-term inventory and accounts receivable financing agreements to increase available cash on hand in response to the Covid-19 outbreak.March 31, 2022.

Debt Instruments, Guarantees and Related Covenants

See Notes 1210 and 1816 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 10-K Report.


~~Table of Contents~~

Financial Assurance Requirements

In addition to various operational and environmental regulations related to our ~~Phosphates~~Phosphate segment, we are subject to financial assurance requirements. In various jurisdictions in which we operate, particularly Florida and Louisiana, we are required to pass a financial strength test or provide credit support, typically in the form of surety bonds, letters of credit, certificates of deposit or trust funds. Further information regarding financial assurance requirements is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition in our 10-K Report, under “EPA RCRA Initiative,” and in Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Environmental, Health, Safety and Security Matters

Waters of the United States. On March 2, 2021, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the district court abused its discretion when it granted the State of ~~Colorado's~~Colorado’s request to stay the effective date of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (the “NWPR”) in Colorado. In reversing and vacating the district ~~court's~~court’s decision, the court ruled that Colorado was not entitled to a preliminary injunction because it did not show it would suffer irreparable injury if the rule went into effect. As a result, the ~~Navigable Waters Protection Rule~~NWPR remains in effect in all states.

On June 9, 2021, EPA Administrator Regan announced that EPA plans to repeal and replace the Trump Administration’s Navigable Waters Protection Rule (i.e. the “waters of the U.S.” legal definition). He asserted that the “EPA and Department of the Army have determined that this [Trump era] rule is leading to significant environmental degradation.”

On June 10, 2021, EPA and the Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) filed a “Motion to Remand to Agency” and supporting legal memorandum with the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Conservation Law Foundation ~~(CLF)~~(“CLF”) v. EPA, et al. asking the court to remand the ~~Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR),~~NWPR, so they can “commence a new rulemaking to revise or replace the rule.”

The Agencies state they intend to initiate a new rulemaking process that restores the protections in place prior to the 2015 ~~WOTUS implementation.~~Waters of the United States (“WOTUS”) implementation. They propose developing a new rule that defines WOTUS, informed by a “robust” engagement process as well as the experience of implementing the pre-2015 rule and prior administrations’ NWPR.

On August 30, 2021, a federal judge in the ~~Obama-era Clean Water Rule,~~U.S. District Court for Arizona issued an order vacating the prior administration’s NWPR, and remanded the rule back to EPA and the ~~Trump-era Navigable Waters Protection Rule.~~Corps. EPA is currently in the process of initiating a rulemaking to replace the NWPR, and it is unclear how this recent decision will affect that formal rulemaking effort. The U.S District Court ordered a reversion back to the pre-2015 standard.

~~NGO environmental groups are criticizing~~


Table of Contents

On the ~~“new rulemaking” approach, as it leaves~~same day, the EPA announced that, in light of the District Court’s vacating of the prior administration’s NWPR, ~~definition of WOTUS in place while~~the EPA and the Corps ~~craft a new definition.These groups are calling for the EPA to repeal~~have halted implementation of the NWPR ~~regulation as soon as possible.The EPA~~ and ~~Corps approach proposed in their Motion to Remand does not repeal~~are interpreting WOTUS consistent with the ~~NWPR.~~pre-2015 standard.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Obligations

Information regarding off-balance sheet arrangements and obligations is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition in our 10-K Report and Note 1516 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Contingencies

Information regarding contingencies is hereby incorporated by reference to Note 1516 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

4438


Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information

All statements, other than statements of historical fact, appearing in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward looking statements include, among other things, statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, including statements about proposed or pending future transactions or strategic plans, statements concerning our future operations, financial condition and prospects, statements regarding our expectations for capital expenditures, statements concerning our level of indebtedness and other information, and any statements of assumptions regarding any of the foregoing. In particular, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “potential”, “predict”, “project” or “should”. These statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations as of the date of this filing.

Factors that could cause reported results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

•the impact of the novel coronavirus Covid-19 pandemic on the global economy and our business, suppliers, customers, employees and the communities in which we operate, as further described in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021;

•business and economic conditions and governmental policies affecting the agricultural industry where we or our customers operate, including price and demand volatility resulting from periodic imbalances of supply and demand;

•potential drop in oil demand, which could lead to a significant decline in production, and its impact on the availability and price of sulfur, a key raw material input for our Phosphate segment operations;

•because of political and economic instability, civil unrest or changes in government policies in Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Peru or other countries in which we do business, our operations could be disrupted as higher costs of doing business could result, including those associated with implementation of new freight tables and new mining legislation;

•changes in farmers’ application rates for crop nutrients;

•changes in the operation of world phosphate or potash markets, including consolidation in the crop nutrient industry, particularly if we do not participate in the consolidation;

•the expansion or contraction of production capacity or selling efforts by competitors or new entrants in the industries in which we operate, including the effects of actions by ~~the other member~~members of Canpotex to prove ~~its~~the production capacity of potash expansion projects, through proving runs or otherwise;

•the effect of future product innovations or development of new technologies on demand for our products;

•seasonality in our business that results in the need to carry significant amounts of inventory and seasonal peaks in working capital requirements, which may result in excess inventory or product shortages;

•changes in the costs, or constraints on supplies, of raw materials or energy used in manufacturing our products, or in the costs or availability of transportation for our products;

•declines in our selling prices or significant increases in costs that can require us to write down our inventories to the lower of cost or market, or require us to impair goodwill or other long-lived assets, or establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets;

•the lag in realizing the benefit of falling market prices for the raw materials we use to produce our products that can occur while we consume raw materials that we purchased or committed to purchase in the past at higher prices;

•disruptions of our operations at any of our key production, distribution, transportation or terminaling facilities, including those of Canpotex or any joint venture in which we participate;

•shortages or other unavailability of railcars, tugs, barges and ships for carrying our products and raw materials;


Table of Contents

•the effects of and change in trade, monetary, environmental, tax and fiscal policies, laws and regulations;

•


~~Table of Contents~~

• foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates;

•tax regulations, currency exchange controls and other restrictions that may affect our ability to optimize the use of our liquidity;

•risks associated with our international operations, including any potential and actual adverse effects related to the Miski Mayo ~~mine;~~Mine;

•adverse weather conditions affecting our operations, including the impact of potential hurricanes, excessive heat, cold, snow, rainfall or drought;

•difficulties or delays in receiving, challenges to, increased costs of obtaining or satisfying conditions of, or revocation or withdrawal of required governmental and regulatory approvals, including permitting activities;

•changes in the environmental and other governmental regulation that applies to our operations, including federal legislation or regulatory action expanding the types and extent of water resources regulated under federal law and the possibility of further federal or state legislation or regulatory action affecting or related to greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon taxes or other measures that may be implemented in Canada or other jurisdictions in which we operate, or of restrictions or liabilities related to elevated levels of naturally-occurring radiation that arise from disturbing the ground in the course of mining activities or possible efforts to reduce the flow of nutrients into the Gulf of Mexico, the Mississippi River basin or elsewhere;

•the potential costs and effects of implementation of federal or state water quality standards for the discharge of nitrogen and/or phosphorus into Florida waterways;

•the financial resources of our competitors, including state-owned and government-subsidized entities in other countries;

•the possibility of defaults by our customers on trade credit that we extend to them or on indebtedness that they incur to purchase our products and that we guarantee;

•any significant reduction in customers’ liquidity or access to credit that they need to purchase our products;

•the effectiveness of the processes we put in place to manage our significant strategic priorities, including the expansion of our Potash business and our investment in MWSPC, and to successfully integrate and grow acquired businesses;

•actual costs of various items differing from management’s current estimates, including, among others, asset retirement, environmental remediation, reclamation or other environmental obligations and Canadian resource taxes and royalties, or the costs of MWSPC or its existing or future funding;

•the costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings and regulatory matters affecting us, including environmental, tax or administrative proceedings, complaints that our operations are adversely impacting nearby farms, businesses, other property uses or properties, settlements thereof and actions taken by courts with respect to approvals of settlements, costs related to defending and resolving global audit, appeal or court activity, and other, and other further developments in legal proceedings and regulatory matters;

•the success of our efforts to attract and retain highly qualified and motivated employees;

•strikes, labor stoppages or slowdowns by our work force or increased costs resulting from unsuccessful labor contract negotiations, and the potential costs and effects of compliance with new regulations affecting our workforce, which increasingly focus on wages and hours, healthcare, retirement and other employee benefits;

•brine inflows at our potash mines;

•accidents or other incidents involving our properties or operations, including potential fires, explosions, seismic events, sinkholes, unsuccessful tailings management, ineffective mine safety procedures, or releases of hazardous or volatile chemicals;


Table of Contents

•terrorism, armed conflict or other malicious intentional acts, including cybersecurity risks such as attempts to gain unauthorized access to, or disable, our information technology systems, or our costs of addressing malicious intentional acts;

•actions by the holders of controlling equity interests in businesses in which we hold a noncontrolling interest;

•


~~Table of Contents~~

• changes in our relationships with ~~the~~ other ~~member~~members of Canpotex or any joint venture in which we participate or their or our exit from participation in Canpotex or any such export association or joint venture, and other changes in our commercial arrangements with unrelated third parties;

•difficulties in realizing benefits under our long-term natural gas based pricing ammonia supply agreement with CF Industries, Inc., including the risks that the cost savings initially anticipated from the agreement may not be fully realized over the term of the agreement or that the price of natural gas or the market price for ammonia during the ~~agreement's~~agreement’s term are at levels at which the agreement’s natural gas based pricing is disadvantageous to us, compared with purchases in the spot market; and

•other risk factors reported from time to time in our ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC reports.

Material uncertainties and other factors known to us are discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 10-K Report and incorporated by reference herein as if fully stated herein.

We base our forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of these statements, whether as a result of changes in underlying factors, new information, future events or other developments.

4741


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to the impact of fluctuations in the relative value of currencies, the impact of interest rates, fluctuations in the purchase price of natural gas, ammonia and sulfur consumed in operations, and changes in freight costs, as well as changes in the market value of our financial instruments. We periodically enter into derivatives in order to mitigate our foreign currency risks, interest rate risks and the effects of changing commodity prices, but not for speculative purposes. See Note 1614 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 10-K Report and Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

Due to the global nature of our operations, we are exposed to currency exchange rate changes which may cause fluctuations in our earnings and cash flows. Our primary foreign currency exposures are the Canadian dollar and Brazilian real. To reduce economic risk and volatility on expected cash flows that are denominated in the Canadian dollar and Brazilian real, we use financial instruments that may include forward contracts, zero-cost collars and/or futures. Mosaic hedges cash flows on a declining basis, up to 18 months for the Canadian dollar and up to 12 months for the Brazilian real. We may enter into hedges of up to 36 months for expected Canadian dollar capital expenditures related to our Esterhazy K3 expansion program.

As of ~~June 30, 2021,~~March 31, 2022, and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the fair value of our major foreign currency exchange contracts was ~~$38.3~~$55.2 million and ~~$10.8~~$(18.6) million, respectively. The table below provides information about Mosaic’s significant foreign exchange derivatives.

4842


Table of Contents


(in millions US$)	(in millions US$)	As of June 30, 2021										As of December 31, 2020														(in millions US$)	As of March 31, 2022																		As of December 31, 2021
		Expected Maturity Date								Fair Value		Expected Maturity Date												Fair Value			Expected Maturity Date																Fair Value		Expected Maturity Date												Fair Value
		Years ending December 31,												Years ending December 31,													Years ending December 31,																				Years ending December 31,
		2021		2022		2023		2024								2022				2023							2022				2023				2024				2025										2023				2024
Foreign Currency Exchange Forwards	Foreign Currency Exchange Forwards																							Foreign Currency Exchange Forwards
Canadian Dollar	Canadian Dollar									$	31.3											$	31.9	Canadian Dollar																	$	16.8											$	3.8
Notional (million US$) - short Canadian dollars	Notional (million US$) - short Canadian dollars	$	181.8	$	111.2	$	32.8	$	—					$	170.0			$	48.4			$	6.0					Notional (million US$) - short Canadian dollars	$	373.6			$	94.0			$	28.2			$	—					$	421.2			$	78.3			$	28.2
Weighted Average Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	1.2570		1.2722		1.2509		—						1.3089				1.3285				1.3304						Weighted Average Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	1.2716				1.2675				1.2874				—						1.2731				1.2665				1.2874
Notional (million US$) - long Canadian dollars	Notional (million US$) - long Canadian dollars	$	492.8	$	436.2	$	73.2	$	33.3			$	670.5			$	196.5			$	59.4					Notional (million US$) - long Canadian dollars	$	1,027.6			$	350.7			$	36.0			$	—							$	1,030.7			$	192.0			$	35.2
Weighted Average Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	1.2946		1.2867		1.3112		1.2330				1.3291				1.3153				1.3299						Weighted Average Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	1.2714				1.2820				1.2354				—								1.2708				1.2893				1.2346
Foreign Currency Exchange Collars	Foreign Currency Exchange Collars																									Foreign Currency Exchange Collars
Canadian Dollar	Canadian Dollar									$	0.7													$	0.4	Canadian Dollar																	$	0.3													$	0.4
Notional (million US$) - long Canadian dollars	Notional (million US$) - long Canadian dollars	$	—	$	30.4	$	—	$	—			$	—			$	30.3			$	—					Notional (million US$) - long Canadian dollars	$	7.7			$	—			$	—			$	—					$	15.5			$	—			$	—
Weighted Average Participation Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Participation Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	—		1.3433		—		—				—				1.3432				—						Weighted Average Participation Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	1.2950				—				—				—						1.3433				—				—
Weighted Average Protection Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Protection Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	—		1.2875		—		—				—				1.2874				—						Weighted Average Protection Rate - Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar	1.3382				—				—				—						1.2875				—				—

Foreign Currency Exchange Non-Deliverable Forwards	Foreign Currency Exchange Non-Deliverable Forwards																									Foreign Currency Exchange Non-Deliverable Forwards
Brazilian Real	Brazilian Real									$	5.9													$	(19.4)	Brazilian Real																	$	39.3													$	(20.8)
Notional (million US$) - short Brazilian real	Notional (million US$) - short Brazilian real	$	864.7	$	7.7	$	—	$	—			$	582.4			$	—			$	—					Notional (million US$) - short Brazilian real	$	753.7			$	—			$	—			$	—					$	531.5			$	—			$	—
Weighted Average Rate - Brazilian real to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Rate - Brazilian real to U.S. dollar	5.2825		5.8499		—		—				5.2160				—				—						Weighted Average Rate - Brazilian real to U.S. dollar	4.9559				—				—				—						5.7121				—				—
Notional (million US$) - long Brazilian real	Notional (million US$) - long Brazilian real	$	628.9	$	191.6	$	—	$	—			$	924.6			$	—			$	—					Notional (million US$) - long Brazilian real	$	374.6			$	—			$	—			$	—					$	679.2			$	—			$	—
Weighted Average Rate - Brazilian real to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Rate - Brazilian real to U.S. dollar	5.3811		5.5274		—		—				5.3068				—				—						Weighted Average Rate - Brazilian real to U.S. dollar	5.7272				—				—				—						5.6748				—				—
Indian Rupee	Indian Rupee									$	0.4													$	(2.1)	Indian Rupee																	$	(0.3)													$	(1.5)
Notional (million US$) - short Indian rupee	Notional (million US$) - short Indian rupee	$	92.0	$	—	$	—	$	—			$	146.0			$	—			$	—					Notional (million US$) - short Indian rupee	$	97.0			$	—			$	—			$	—					$	125.0			$	—			$	—
Weighted Average Rate - Indian rupee to U.S. dollar	Weighted Average Rate - Indian rupee to U.S. dollar	74.9722		—		—		—				74.5083				—				—						Weighted Average Rate - Indian rupee to U.S. dollar	77.1729				—				—				—						75.7627				—				—

China Renminbi																										China Renminbi																	$	(0.9)													$	(0.5)
Notional (million US$) - short China renminbi																										Notional (million US$) - short China renminbi	$	88.0			$	—			$	—			$	—					$	68.0			$	—			$	—
Weighted Average Rate - China renminbi to U.S. dollar																										Weighted Average Rate - China renminbi to U.S. dollar	6.4624				—				—				—						6.4750				—				—

Total Fair Value	Total Fair Value									$	38.3													$	10.8	Total Fair Value																	$	55.2													$	(18.6)

Further information regarding foreign currency exchange rates and derivatives is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 10-K Report and Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated ~~Financial Statements in this report.~~

~~Commodities~~

~~As of June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the fair value of our natural gas commodities contracts was $20.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively.~~

4943


Table of Contents

Financial Statements in this report.

Commodities

As of March 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, the fair value of our natural gas commodities contracts was $42.1 million and $18.8 million, respectively.

The table below provides information about our natural gas derivatives which are used to manage the risk related to significant price changes in natural gas.


(in millions)	(in millions)	As of June 30, 2021										As of December 31, 2020										(in millions)	As of March 31, 2022										As of December 31, 2021
		Expected Maturity Date										Expected Maturity Date											Expected Maturity Date										Expected Maturity Date
		Years ending December 31,										Years ending December 31,											Years ending December 31,										Years ending December 31,
		2021		2022		2023		2024		Fair Value		2021		2022		2023		2024		Fair Value			2022		2023		2024		2025		Fair Value		2022		2023		2024		2025		Fair Value
Natural Gas Swaps	Natural Gas Swaps									$	20.3									$	5.3	Natural Gas Swaps									$	42.1									$	18.8
Notional (million MMBtu) - long	Notional (million MMBtu) - long	7.8		9.9		9.4		2.0				17.7		8.5		1.2		—				Notional (million MMBtu) - long	6.6		9.4		4.8		—				9.4		9.4		4.8		—
Weighted Average Rate (US$/MMBtu)	Weighted Average Rate (US$/MMBtu)	$	1.92	$	2.25	$	2.36	$	2.44			$	1.93	$	2.16	$	2.88	$	—			Weighted Average Rate (US$/MMBtu)	$	2.27	$	2.35	$	2.73	$	—			$	2.21	$	2.34	$	2.72	$	—
Total Fair Value	Total Fair Value									$	20.3									$	5.3	Total Fair Value									$	42.1									$	18.8

Further information regarding commodities and derivatives is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 10-K Report and Note 11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

5044


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded, based on such evaluations, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose for which they were designed as of the end of such period.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, have evaluated any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021~~March 31, 2022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, did not identify any such changes during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022.

5145


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We have included information about legal and environmental proceedings in Note 1516 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. This information is incorporated herein by reference.

We are also subject to the following legal and environmental proceedings in addition to those described in Note 1516 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report:

Waters of the United ~~States.~~States (“WOTUS”). In June 2015, EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) jointly issued a final rule that proposed to clarify ~~but may actually expand,~~ the scope of waters regulated under the federal Clean Water ~~Act.~~Act (the “CWA”). The final rule (the “2015 Clean Water Rule”) became effective in August 2015, but has been challenged through numerous lawsuits. ~~In October 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an order staying the effectiveness of the final rule nationwide pending adjudication of substantive challenges to the rule.In early 2017, the U.S. President issued an Executive Order directing EPA and the Corps to publish a proposed rule rescinding or revising the new rule.~~In June 2017, EPA and the Corps issued a proposed rule that would rescind the 2015 Clean Water Rule and re-codify regulatory text that existed prior to enactment of the 2015 Clean Water Rule. In November 2017, EPA issued a rule notice proposing to extend the applicability date of the 2015 Clean Water Rule for two years from the date of final action on the proposed rule, to provide continuity and regulatory certainty while agencies proceed to consider potential changes to the 2015 Clean Water Rule.

In January 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held all challenges to the 2015 Clean Water Rule must be heard in federal district courts rather than in the federal courts of appeal, overruling a decision by the Sixth ~~Circuit's~~Circuit’s Court of Appeals. ~~With the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals no longer having jurisdiction, that court lifted its 2015 nationwide stay in February 2018.After the nationwide stay was lifted,~~Since then, a number of U.S. District Courts revived dormant litigation that challenged the 2015 Clean Water Rule.In June 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia entered an injunction against implementation of the 2015 Clean Water Rule covering 11 states, including Florida. As of September 2018, federal district courts have put the 2015 Clean Water Rule on hold in 28 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories.

On December 11, 2018, EPA and the Corps issued a proposed rule to replace the 2015 Clean Water Rule, referred to as the “Navigable Waters Protection ~~Rule.”~~Rule” (the “NWPR”). The agencies’ stated interpretation for the proposed rule is to provide clarity, predictability and consistency so that the regulated community can better understand where the ~~Clean Water Act~~CWA applies and where it does not.~~EPA and the Corps received over 600,000 public comments on the proposed rule.~~

On September 12, 2019, EPA and the Corps jointly issued a final regulation that repealed the 2015 Clean Water Rule and restored the previous regulatory regime.This regulation ~~reestablished~~re-established national consistency by returning all jurisdictions to the longstanding regulatory framework that existed prior to the 2015 Clean Water Rule.~~The final rule and repeal of the 2015 Clean Water Rule took effect sixty (60) days after publication in the Federal Register.~~

The ~~September 12, 2019~~ repeal of the 2015 Clean Water Rule was the first step in a two-step rulemaking process to define the scope of “waters of the United States” that are regulated under the ~~Clean Water Act.~~CWA. The second step was completed in April 2020, when EPA and the Corps jointly issued the ~~“Navigable Waters Protection Rule” published~~final NWPR which became effective on ~~April 21, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 22,250).~~June 22, 2020. By defining what constitutes ~~“waters of the United States”~~WOTUS under the federal ~~Clean Water Act (“CWA”),~~CWA, the new rule distinguishes between federal waters and waters under the sole control of the States.It also clarifies the types of connections to perennial and intermittent tributaries that make lakes and ponds jurisdictional and clarifies the factors that determine when wetlands are considered “adjacent”.

The new ~~“Navigable Waters Protection Rule”~~NWPR revised the definition of ~~“waters of the United States” (WOTUS)~~WOTUS under the CWA to include: (i) territorial seas and traditional navigable waters; (ii) perennial and intermittent tributaries to those waters; (iii) certain lakes, ponds, and impoundments; and (iv) ~~and~~ wetlands adjacent to jurisdictional waters. ~~According to EPA,~~ “Congress, in the Clean Water Act, explicitly directed the Agencies to protect ‘navigable waters.’ The Navigable Waters Protection Rule regulates the nation’s navigable waters and the core tributary systems that provide perennial or intermittent flow into them.”


~~Table of Contents~~

The new ~~Navigable Waters Protection Rule~~NWPR is in effect in every state except ~~for~~ Colorado. ~~The U.S. District of Colorado blocked implementation of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule in Colorado, holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in~~ ~~Rapanos v.United~~ States foreclosed the interpretation the U.S. EPA and Corps had incorporated into the new regulation. On the same day, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California reached the opposite conclusion, instead denying a motion by a group of states and cities to block the rule’s nationwide implementation. Similar requests for relief have been made in other federal district courts, including Arizona, Washington and New Mexico. To date, there have been 13 complaints filed in 11 different U.S. District Courts seeking to challenge final rule.

In August 2020, the Justice Department, an industry coalition, and individual landowners filed a Notice of Appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit to challenge the injunction entered by the ~~Colorado~~ District ~~Court.~~Court for Colorado.

On March 2, 2021, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the ~~district court~~District Court abused its discretion when it granted the State of ~~Colorado's~~Colorado’s request to stay the effective date of the ~~Navigable Waters Protection Rule~~NWPR in Colorado. In reversing and vacating the ~~district court's~~District Court’s decision, the ~~court~~10th Circuit ruled that Colorado was not entitled to a preliminary injunction because it did not show it would suffer irreparable injury if the rule went into effect. As a result, the ~~Navigable Waters Protection Rule~~NWPR remains in effect in all states.

On June 10, 2021, EPA and the Corps filed a “Motion to Remand to Agency” and supporting legal memorandum with the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Conservation Law Foundation ~~(CLF)~~(“CLF”) v. EPA, et al. asking the court to remand the ~~Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR),~~NWPR so they can “commence a new rulemaking to revise or replace the ~~rule.”~~

rule”. The ~~Agencies~~agencies state they intend to initiate a new rulemaking process that restores the protections in place prior to the 2015 ~~WOTUS~~Clean Water Rule implementation.They propose developing a new rule that defines WOTUS, informed by a “robust” engagement process as well as the experience of implementing the pre-2015 rule ~~the Obama-era Clean Water Rule,~~ and ~~the Trump-era Navigable Waters Protection Rule.~~prior administrations’ NWPR.

~~NGO environmental groups are criticizing~~On August 30, 2021, a federal judge in the ~~“new rulemaking” approach, as it leaves~~U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona issued an order vacating the prior administration’s NWPR, ~~definition of WOTUS in place while~~and remanded the rule back to EPA and the ~~Corps craft~~Corps. EPA is currently in the process of initiating a ~~new definition.These groups are calling for~~rulemaking to replace the ~~EPA to repeal~~NWPR. It is unclear how this recent decision will affect that formal rulemaking effort, or the ~~NWPR regulation as soon as possible.~~Company's future operations.

~~The EPA and Corps approach proposed in their Motion to Remand does not repeal the NWPR.~~


Table of Contents

The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona reverted back to the pre-2015 standard.

On August 30, 2021, the EPA announced that in light of the Arizona Court’s vacating of the NWPR, the EPA and Corps have halted implementation of the NWPR and are interpreting WOTUS consistent with the pre-2015 standard.

Countervailing Duty ~~Petitions.~~Petitions. In 2020, we filed petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“(“ITC”) that requested the initiation of countervailing duty investigations into imports of phosphate fertilizers from Morocco and Russia. The purpose of the petitions was to remedy the distortions that we believe foreign subsidies have caused or are causing in the U.S. market for phosphate fertilizers, and thereby restore fair competition. On February 16, 2021, the DOC made final affirmative determinations that countervailable subsidies were being provided by those governments. On March 11, 2021 the ITC made final affirmative determinations that the U.S. phosphate fertilizer industry is materially injured by reason of subsidized phosphate fertilizer imports from Morocco and Russia. As a result of ~~these~~subsequent DOC and ITC determinations, the DOC issued countervailing duty orders on phosphate fertilizer imports from Russia and Morocco, which are scheduled to remain in place ~~for~~until at least ~~five years.~~April 2026. Currently, the cash deposit rates for such imports are approximately 20 percent for Moroccan producer OCP, 9 percent and 47 percent for Russian producers PhosAgro and Eurochem, respectively, and 17 percent for all other ~~/Russian~~Russian producers. The final determinations in the DOC and ITC investigations are subject to challenge before U.S. federal courts and the World Trade Organization. Mosaic has initiated actions at the U.S. Court of International Trade contesting certain aspects of the DOC's final determinations that, we believe, failed to capture the full extent of Moroccan and Russian phosphate fertilizer subsidies. Moroccan and Russian producers have also initiated U.S. Court of International Trade actions, seeking lower cash deposit rates and revocation of the countervailing duty orders. Further, the cash deposit rates and the amount of countervailing duties owed by importers on such imports could change based on the results of the litigation, as well as DOC's annual administrative review proceedings.

The South Pasture Extension Mine Litigation.On January 8, 2020, the Hardee County Mining Coordinator issued a Notice of Violation (“NOV”)for the failure by Mosaic to proceed with reclamation of two designated ~~Reclamation Units~~reclamation units within the South Pasture Mine footprint. These two ~~Reclamation Units~~reclamation units comprise 166 acres of mined lands. The NOV cites noncompliance with


~~Table of Contents~~

the County Land Development Regulations and with the conditions of Development of Regional Impact (“DRI”) Development Order 12-21 that was issued in 2012 to authorize continued mining at the South Pasture Mine, continued operation of the South Pasture beneficiation plant, and mining at the South Pasture Mine Extension. Through the NOV, the County requested that Mosaic submit a revised reclamation plan and schedule to demonstrate when initial reclamation activities would be completed for the two Reclamation Units identified in the NOV.

The delay in meeting the required reclamation schedule at the two ~~Reclamation Units~~reclamation units is tied to the idling and eventual shutdown of the Plant City fertilizer plant and the idling of the South Pasture Mine beneficiation plant. The Plant City ~~facility~~Facility was first idled in late 2017 and in June 2019, Mosaic announced that the Plant City ~~facility~~Facility would be closed permanently.

Given the relationship between the Plant City fertilizer plant and the South Pasture beneficiation plant, and facing adverse market conditions, Mosaic idled the South Pasture beneficiation plant in September 2018. Idling of the South Pasture Mine beneficiation plant in September 2018 resulted in no tailings sand being produced by the processing of phosphate matrix. As a result, there was no tailings sand available for use in sand backfilling reclamation at the South Pasture Mine, and specifically, the two Reclamation Units identified in the County’s January 8th NOV.

On March 10, 2020, Mosaic filed an “Application for Waiver and Reclamation Schedule Extension” to secure Board of County Commissioners (“BOCC”) approval of extended reclamation deadlines for the South Pasture Mine. To obtain waiver relief from the BOCC, a quasi-judicial hearing would be required.

Extensive negotiations between Mosaic and County legal and technical staff resulted in an agreement that involved two separate but related actions: (1) secure a ~~Waiver~~waiver and ~~Reclamation Schedule Extension~~reclamation schedule extension through formal action by the BOCC at a quasi-judicial public hearing; and (2) enter into a ~~Settlement Agreement~~settlement agreement that would require payment of a civil penalty by Mosaic for the non-compliance in meeting the required reclamation deadlines of the South Pasture Mine Development Order and the County Mining Ordinance. The ~~Settlement Agreement~~settlement agreement would also be presented and acted upon at a formal public hearing before the BOCC.

On May 7, 2020, a quasi-public judicial hearing was held before the Hardee County BOCC. At that hearing, the BOCC voted unanimously to issue a ~~Waiver~~waiver of the applicable reclamation deadlines of the South Pasture Development Order and the County Ordinance for three specific reclamation areas of the South Pasture Mine. The ~~Waiver~~waiver also included a negotiated ~~Alternative Reclamation Schedule~~alternative reclamation schedule that extends the deadline for completion of reclamation until the end of 2023. At that same hearing, the BOCC approved a ~~Settlement Agreement~~settlement agreement that resolved all outstanding non-compliance associated with reclamation obligations at the South Pasture Mine and requires Mosaic to pay an agreed settlement amount of $249,000.


Table of Contents

Mosaic has satisfied the payment obligation of the ~~Settlement Agreement~~settlement agreement and continues to implement the ~~Alternative Reclamation Schedule,~~alternative reclamation schedule, as required.Monitoring programs have been put in place to ensure continued compliance with the ~~Waiver~~waiver and ~~Settlement Agreement.~~settlement agreement.

Cruz ~~Litigation.~~Litigation. On August 27, 2020, a putative class action complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in Hillsborough County, FLFlorida against our ~~wholly owned~~wholly-owned subsidiary, Mosaic Global Operations Inc., and two unrelated co-defendants. The complaint alleges claims related to elevated levels of radiation at two manufactured housing communities located on reclaimed mining land in Mulberry, Polk County, Florida, allegedly due to phosphate mining and reclamation activities occurring decades ago. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, including punitive damages, injunctive relief requiring remediation of their properties, and a medical monitoring program funded by the defendants. On October 14, 2021, the court substantially granted a motion to dismiss that Mosaic filed late in 2020, with leave for the plaintiffs to amend their complaint.

On November 3, 2021, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint and in response, Mosaic filed a motion to dismiss that complaint with prejudice on November 15, 2021. On December 23, 2021, plaintiffs opposed that motion and Mosaic replied to that opposition on January 26, 2022. On April 6, 2022, the court heard argument on the motions to dismiss filed by Mosaic and each other co-defendant.

We intend to vigorously defend this matter.

5448


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Important risk factors that apply to us are outlined in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 (the “10-K Report”). In addition to these risk factors, we include the following updates:

Operational Risks

~~Our Esterhazy mine has~~Key inputs for the production of our finished goods, including fertilizer, sulfur and ammonia, and energy used in our businesses in the past have been and may in the future be the subject of volatile pricing and availability. Changes in the price or availability of these key inputs for production of finished goods have had, ~~an inflow of salt saturated brine for more than 30 years.~~and could again have, a material adverse impact on our businesses.

~~Since December 1985, we~~From time to time, our profitability has been and may in the future be adversely impacted by the price and availability of key inputs and energy costs. For example, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the related sanctions have had inflows of salt saturated brine into our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine. Over the past century, several potash mines experiencing water inflow problems have flooded. In order to control brine inflows at Esterhazy, we have incurred,led, and ~~will~~may continue to ~~incur, expenditures, certain of which, due~~lead, to ~~their nature, have been capitalized, while others have been charged to expense.~~

~~At various times, we experience changing amounts~~disruption and ~~patterns of brine inflows at the Esterhazy mine. Periodically, some~~instability in global markets, supply chains and volatile pricing and availability of these inflows have exceeded available pumping capacity. If that were to continue for several months without abatement, it could exceed our available storage capacity and ability to effectively manage the brine inflow. This could adversely affect production at the Esterhazy mine. The brine inflow is variable, resulting in both net inflows (the rate of inflow is more than the amount we are pumping out of the mine) and net outflows (when we are pumping more brine out of the mine than the rate of inflow). Our mines at Colonsay, Saskatchewan, and Carlsbad, New Mexico, are also subject to the risks of inflow of water as a result of our shaft mining operations.

~~Due to increased brine inflows, on June 4 2021, the Company made the decision to accelerate the timing of the shutdown of our K1 and K2 mine shafts at our Esterhazy, Saskatchewan potash mine.~~

~~It is possible that the brine inflows risk to employees or management costs may~~key inputs. A significant increase to a level which would cause us to change our mining processes or abandon our other operating mines. See the “Key Factors that can Affect Results of Operations and Financial Condition” and “Potash Net Sales and Gross Margin” sections of our Management’s Analysis on our Form 10-K report for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the Esterhazy Closure Costs in Note 17 of this report, which sections are incorporated herein by reference, for a discussion of costs, risks and other information relating to the brine inflows.

~~Our assets outside of North America are located in countries with volatile conditions, which could subject us and our assets to significant risks.~~

We are a global business with substantial assets located outside of the United States and Canada. Our operations in Brazil, China, India and Paraguay are a fundamental part of our business. We have a majority interest in the joint venture entity operating the Miski Mayo mine in Peru that supplies phosphate rock to us. We also have a joint venture investment in MWSPC, which operates a mine and chemical complexes that produce phosphate fertilizers and other downstream products in the Kingdomprice or availability of Saudi Arabia. Volatile economic, market and political conditions, including the recent election of Peru's president, may have a negative impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition. In addition, unfavorable changes in trade protection laws, policies and measures,these key inputs or governmental actions and policies and other regulatory requirements affecting trade and the pricing and sourcing of our raw materials, may also have a negative impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition.

Natural resource extraction is an important part of the economy in Peru, and, in the past, there have been protests against other natural resource operations in Peru. There remain numerous social conflicts that exist within the natural resource sector in Peru. As a result, there is potential for active protests against natural resource companies. If the Government of Peru’s proactive efforts to address the social and environmental issues surrounding natural resource activities are not successful, protests could extend to or impact the Miski Mayo mine and adversely affect our interest in the Miski Mayo joint venture or the supply of phosphate rock to us from the mine.

We use tailings, sediments and water dams, clay settling areas and phosphogypsum stacks to manage residual materials generated in our mining and fertilizer production operations. If our safety procedures are not effective, an accident involving these impoundments could result in serious injuries or death, damage to property or the environment, or


~~Table of Contents~~

~~result in the shutdown of our facilities, any of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.~~

Mining and processing of potash and phosphate generate residual materials that must be managed both during the operation of the facility and upon facility closure. Potash tailings, consisting primarily of salt and clay, are stored in surface disposal sites. Phosphate clay residuals from mining are deposited in large tailing dams in Brazil and in clay settling areas and phosphogypsum stacks in the United States. They are regularly monitored to evaluate structural stability and for leaks. The failure of or a breach at any of our tailings dams and other impoundments at any of our operations could cause severe property and environmental damage and loss of life, could result in the shut down or idling of our facilities andenergy costs could have a material adverse ~~effect~~impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Legislation at both Brazilian federal and state levels has introduced new rules regarding tailings dam safety, construction, licensing and operations. We cannot predict the full impact of these legislative or potentially related judicial actions, or future actions, or whether or how it would affect our Brazilian operations or customers.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Pursuant to our employee stock plans relating to the grant of employee stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock unit awards, and other equity-based awards, we have granted and may in the future grant employee stock options to purchase shares of our Common Stock for which the purchase price may be paid by means of delivery to us by the optionee of shares of our Common Stock that are already owned by the optionee (at a value equal to market value on the date of the option exercise). During the periods covered by this report, no options to purchase shares of our Common Stock were exercised for which the purchase price was so paid.

On ~~May 14, 2015, we announced~~August 23, 2021, our ~~2015~~Board of Directors authorized the 2021 Repurchase Program, which replaces the previous authorization that had $700 million of the original $1.5 billion remaining. The 2021 Repurchase Program allows us to repurchase up to ~~$1.5~~$1.0 billion of our Common Stock through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase arrangements, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. ~~No repurchases were made in~~On February 24, 2022, pursuant to existing stock repurchase authorizations, we entered into an ASR agreement with a third-party financial institution to repurchase $400 million of our Common Stock. Following the ~~three months~~completion of the current authorization, our Board of Directors has approved the establishment of a new $1.0 billion share repurchase authorization.

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities(a)

The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of our Common Stock that we purchased under the Repurchase Program during the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2021.~~March 31, 2022:


Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced program	Maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the program(b)
Common Stock
January 1, 2022- January 31, 2022	377,591	$	40.09	377,591	$	573,936,173
February 1, 2022- February 28, 2022(c)	7,212,073	56.42		7,212,073	167,000,619
March 1, 2022- March 31, 2022	—	—		—	—
Total	7,589,664	$	55.61	7,589,664	$	167,000,619


Table of Contents

(a) On August 23, 2021, we announced our 2021 Repurchase Program, replacing our 2015 Repurchase Program, which allows us to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of our Common Stock through open market purchases, accelerated share repurchase arrangements, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The 2021 Repurchase Program has no set expiration date.

(b) At the end of the month shown.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this report.


~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following Exhibits are being filed herewith.

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No

Description

Incorporated Herein by Reference to

Filed with Electronic Submission

~~10.iii.a~~10.iii.d

~~Summary~~Form of ~~Board of Director Compensation of~~expatriate agreement dated February 5, 2016 between Mosaic and an executive officer

31.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a).

32.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

32.2

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Mine Safety Disclosures

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document)

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)


Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


			THE MOSAIC COMPANY

			by:						/S/ CLINT C. FREELAND
									Clint C. Freeland
									Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
									(on behalf of the registrant and as principal accounting officer)

~~August~~May 3, ~~2021~~2022

5851


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2021		2020		2021		2020
Net income (loss) attributable to Mosaic	$	437.2	$	47.4	$	593.9	$	(155.6)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	379.8		379.1		379.5		378.9
Dilutive impact of share-based awards	3.5		2.2		3.5		0
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	383.3		381.3		383.0		378.9
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic	$	1.15	$	0.13	$	1.56	$	(0.41)
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Mosaic	$	1.14	$	0.12	$	1.55	$	(0.41)


	Phosphates		Potash		Mosaic Fertilizantes		Corporate, Eliminations and Other (a)		Total
Three months ended June 30, 2021
Net sales to external customers	$	910.2	$	659.1	$	1,035.7	$	195.7	$	2,800.7
Intersegment net sales	264.6		3.9		0		(268.5)		0
Net sales	1,174.8		663.0		1,035.7		(72.8)		2,800.7
Gross margin	308.5		217.2		185.1		41.5		752.3
Canadian resource taxes	0		54.2		0		0		54.2
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes)	308.5		271.4		185.1		41.5		806.5
Mine closure costs	0		158.1		0		0		158.1
Operating earnings (loss)	283.1		48.9		170.5		(18.5)		484.0
Capital expenditures	150.0		98.2		44.3		4.7		297.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	105.6		70.3		23.8		3.8		203.5



Three months ended June 30, 2020
Net sales to external customers	$	550.1	$	544.8	$	787.0	$	162.8	$	2,044.7
Intersegment net sales	212.3		10.6		0		(222.9)		0
Net sales	762.4		555.4		787.0		(60.1)		2,044.7
Gross margin	17.7		131.6		100.7		7.0		257.0
Canadian resource taxes	0		52.1		0		0		52.1
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes)	17.7		183.7		100.7		7.0		309.1

Operating earnings (loss)	(59.4)		125.5		76.4		(56.7)		85.8
Capital expenditures	122.2		111.4		19.7		3.9		257.2
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	113.9		71.8		27.0		2.7		215.4



Six months ended June 30, 2021
Net sales to external customers	$	1,794.8	$	1,132.2	$	1,799.1	$	371.7	$	5,097.8
Intersegment net sales	381.0		8.2		0		(389.2)		0
Net sales	2,175.8		1,140.4		1,799.1		(17.5)		5,097.8
Gross margin	481.1		357.4		288.2		60.5		1,187.2
Canadian resource taxes	0		89.2		0		0		89.2
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes)	481.1		446.6		288.2		60.5		1,276.4
Mine closure costs	0		158.1		0		0		158.1
Operating earnings (loss)	436.0		173.8		261.0		(73.6)		797.2
Capital expenditures	302.5		194.7		83.1		5.5		585.8
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	208.0		149.8		47.0		7.8		412.6



Six months ended June 30, 2020
Net sales to external customers	$	1,087.4	$	983.4	$	1,518.1	$	253.9	$	3,842.8
Intersegment net sales	294.4		13.6		0		(308.0)		0
Net sales	1,381.8		997.0		1,518.1		(54.1)		3,842.8
Gross margin	(65.2)		240.7		167.2		(44.3)		298.4
Canadian resource taxes	0		83.8		0		0		83.8
Gross margin (excluding Canadian resource taxes)	(65.2)		324.5		167.2		(44.3)		382.2

Operating earnings (loss)	(166.2)		219.7		105.4		(139.3)		19.6
Capital expenditures	260.1		209.7		45.0		5.9		520.7
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense	228.3		141.9		55.2		7.8		433.2



Total Assets
As of June 30, 2021	$	7,826.5	$	7,809.5	$	5,098.4	$	739.1	$	21,473.5
As of December 31, 2020	7,022.1		7,614.8		4,127.7		1,025.2		19,789.8