UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-32172

XPO Logistics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		03-0450326
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



Five Greenwich Office Park Greenwich, CT		06831
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

(855) ~~976-4636~~976-6951

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

As of ~~May 4,~~August 1, 2016, there were ~~110,006,419~~110,150,495 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

~~Table of Contents~~

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Form 10-Q

Index




Part I—Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
~~Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity~~	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	65
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2722
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3530
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	3532
Part II—Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	3532
Item 1A. Risk Factors	3533
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3533
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3533
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	3533
Item 5. Other Information	3534
Item 6. Exhibits	3635

Part I—Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	March 31,			December 31,			June 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)	(Unaudited)
(In millions, except share and per share data)							(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	279.0		$	289.8		$	377.8		$	289.8
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $20.3 and $16.9, respectively	2,265.1			2,266.4
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $21.3 and $16.9, respectively							2,266.4			2,266.4
Other current assets	497.0			401.0			461.8			401.0
Total current assets	3,041.1			2,957.2			3,106.0			2,957.2
Property and equipment, net of $349.9 and $209.3 in accumulated depreciation, respectively	2,820.3			2,852.2
Property and equipment, net of $464.1 and $209.3 in accumulated depreciation, respectively							2,754.5			2,852.2
Goodwill	4,787.0			4,610.6			4,732.0			4,610.6
Identifiable intangible assets, net of $268.4 and $224.5 in accumulated amortization, respectively	1,704.2			1,876.5
Identifiable intangible assets, net of $310.6 and $224.5 in accumulated amortization, respectively							1,637.5			1,876.5
Deferred tax asset	2.8			113.6			2.6			113.6
Other long-term assets	236.9			233.1			197.7			233.1
Total long-term assets	9,551.2			9,686.0			9,324.3			9,686.0
Total assets	$	12,592.3		$	12,643.2		$	12,430.3		$	12,643.2
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	997.7		$	1,063.7		$	986.1		$	1,063.7
Accrued expenses	1,352.3			1,291.8			1,391.2			1,291.8
Current maturities of long-term debt	134.3			135.3			121.1			135.3
Other current liabilities	228.6			203.6			141.8			203.6
Total current liabilities	2,712.9			2,694.4			2,640.2			2,694.4
Long-term debt	5,379.1			5,272.6			5,342.7			5,272.6
Deferred tax liability	719.1			933.3			712.6			933.3
Employee benefit obligations	302.7			312.6			284.0			312.6
Other long-term liabilities	396.9			369.5			373.6			369.5
Total long-term liabilities	6,797.8			6,888.0			6,712.9			6,888.0
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Convertible perpetual preferred stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 72,885 of Series A shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015	42.0			42.0
Common stock, $.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 109,736,757 and 109,523,493 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	0.1			0.1
Convertible perpetual preferred stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 72,885 of Series A shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015							42.0			42.0
Common stock, $.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 110,146,754 and 109,523,493 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively							0.1			0.1
Additional paid-in capital	3,219.4			3,212.3			3,229.8			3,212.3
Accumulated deficit	(488.2		)	(465.0		)	(443.0		)	(465.0		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(47.3		)	(72.3		)	(100.5		)	(72.3		)
Total stockholders' equity before noncontrolling interests							2,728.4			2,717.1
Noncontrolling interests	355.6			343.7			348.8			343.7
Total stockholders’ equity	3,081.6			3,060.8
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	12,592.3		$	12,643.2
Total equity							3,077.2			3,060.8
Total liabilities and equity							$	12,430.3		$	12,643.2

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)	2016			2015
(In millions, except per share data)							2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenue	$	3,545.7		$	703.0		$	3,683.3		$	1,215.9		$	7,229.0		$	1,918.9
Operating expenses
Cost of transportation and services	1,945.1			440.8			1,973.3			707.3			3,918.4			1,148.0
Direct operating expense	1,106.2			151.2			1,130.2			318.3			2,236.4			469.5
Sales, general and administrative expense	432.0			115.8			409.5			220.4			841.5			336.0
Total operating expenses	3,483.3			707.8			3,513.0			1,246.0			6,996.3			1,953.5
Operating income (loss)	62.4			(4.8		)	170.3			(30.1		)	232.7			(34.6		)
Other expense	1.2			0.2
Other (income) expense							(7.9		)	2.1			(6.7		)	2.4
Foreign currency loss	3.1			0.2			0.1			19.8			3.2			20.0
Interest expense	93.1			23.1			94.7			36.3			187.8			59.4
Loss before income tax benefit	(35.0		)	(28.3		)
Income tax benefit	(15.7		)	(13.6		)
Net loss	(19.3		)	(14.7		)
Cumulative preferred dividends	(0.7		)	(0.7		)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(3.2		)	—
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(23.2	)	$	(15.4	)
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)							83.4			(88.3		)	48.4			(116.4		)
Income tax provision (benefit)							33.0			(9.5		)	17.3			(23.2		)
Net income (loss)							50.4			(78.8		)	31.1			(93.2		)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests							(3.8		)	4.4			(7.0		)	4.4
Net income (loss) attributable to XPO							$	46.6		$	(74.4	)	$	24.1		$	(88.8	)

Basic loss per share	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.20	)
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.20	)
Earnings per share data:
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders (Note 13)							$	42.6		$	(75.1	)	$	22.0		$	(90.3	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share (Note 13)							$	0.39		$	(0.89	)	$	0.20		$	(1.11	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share (Note 13)							$	0.35		$	(0.89	)	$	0.19		$	(1.11	)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding	109.6			78.8			110.0			84.3			109.8			81.6
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding	109.6			78.8			122.3			84.3			118.9			81.6

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2016 2015
Net loss $ (19.3 ) $ (14.7 )
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (3.2 ) —
Net loss attributable to the Company $ (22.5 )
$ (14.7 )

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation gains $ 52.1
$ —
Unrealized losses on cash flow and net investment hedges, net of tax effect of $14.7 and $0.0 (18.4 ) —
Other comprehensive income 33.7
—
Less: Other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (8.7 ) —
Other comprehensive income attributable to the Company $ 25.0
$ —

Comprehensive income (loss) $ 14.4
$ (14.7 )
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (11.9 ) —
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company $ 2.5
$ (14.7 )



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions)	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net income (loss)	$	50.4		$	(78.8	)	$	31.1		$	(93.2	)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	(3.8		)	4.4			(7.0		)	4.4
Net income (loss) attributable to XPO	$	46.6		$	(74.4	)	$	24.1		$	(88.8	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation (losses) gains	$	(85.6	)	$	5.7		$	(33.5	)	$	5.7
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow and net investment hedges, net of tax effect of $(7.5), $0.0, $7.2 and $0.0	21.8			(32.0		)	3.4			(32.0		)
Change in defined benefit plans liability, net of tax effect of $0.0, $(2.9), $0.0 and $(2.9)	—			11.5			—			11.5
Other comprehensive loss	(63.8		)	(14.8		)	(30.1		)	(14.8		)
Less: Other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests	10.6			(5.2		)	1.9			(5.2		)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to XPO	$	(53.2	)	$	(20.0	)	$	(28.2	)	$	(20.0	)

Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(13.4	)	$	(93.6	)	$	1.0		$	(108.0	)
Less: Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests	6.8			(0.8		)	(5.1		)	(0.8		)
Comprehensive loss attributable to XPO	$	(6.6	)	$	(94.4	)	$	(4.1	)	$	(108.8	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2016			2015
(In millions)							2016			2015
Operating activities
Net loss	$	(19.3	)	$	(14.7	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities
Net income (loss)							$	31.1		$	(93.2	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	162.1			33.8			323.6			89.9
Deferred tax benefit	(22.7		)	(15.8		)
Non-cash stock compensation expense	11.9			2.3
Deferred tax expense (benefit)							2.7			(29.4		)
Stock compensation expense							20.5			16.9
Other	4.0			8.9			6.2			23.0
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable	30.9			50.6			5.5			(10.7		)
Income tax receivable	1.4			15.8
Prepaid expense and other assets	(67.2		)	(5.4		)	(52.8		)	2.2
Accounts payable	(90.5		)	(10.6		)	(78.4		)	(22.8		)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(3.7		)	(17.6		)	9.2			0.9
Cash flows provided by operating activities	6.9			47.3
Cash flows provided (used) by operating activities							267.6			(23.2		)
Investing activities
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	—			(58.2		)
Payment for purchases of property and equipment	(114.7		)	(11.4		)	(224.0		)	(41.9		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	17.5			—			35.6			24.3
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired							—			(1,610.7		)
Loss on forward contract related to acquisition							—			(6.9		)
Other							8.3			—
Cash flows used by investing activities	(97.2		)	(69.6		)	(180.1		)	(1,635.2		)
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	—			414.7
Payment for debt issuance costs	—			(4.5		)
Repayment of long-term debt and capital leases	(41.8		)	—			(90.0		)	(759.2		)
Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility	200.0			—			260.0			—
Repayment of borrowings on revolving credit facility	(100.0		)	—			(160.0		)	—
Bank overdrafts	18.3			—			(10.9		)	(19.3		)
Proceeds from preferred stock and common stock offerings							—			1,260.0
Payment for equity issuance costs							—			(31.9		)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt							—			2,555.2
Payment for debt issuance costs							—			(7.9		)
Transfer to restricted cash for tender offer							—			(809.3		)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders	(0.7		)	(0.7		)	(1.5		)	(1.5		)
Other	—			3.0			2.2			3.6
Cash flows provided by financing activities	75.8			412.5
Cash flows (used) provided by financing activities							(0.2		)	2,189.7
Effect of exchange rates on cash	3.7			—			0.7			0.4
Net (decrease) increase in cash	(10.8		)	390.2
Net increase in cash							88.0			531.7
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	289.8			644.1			289.8			644.1
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	279.0		$	1,034.3		$	377.8		$	1,175.8
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	72.6		$	39.9		$	178.4		$	48.9
Cash paid (received) for income taxes	$	4.8		$	(13.9	)	$	26.9		$	(12.1	)
Property plant and equipment acquired through an increase in accounts payable	$	19.5		$	—
Property plant and equipment acquired through an increase in capital lease	$	10.6		$	—
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Property plant and equipment acquired through capital lease							$	29.8		$	—
Equity portion of acquisition purchase price	$	—		$	0.8		$	—		$	1.5
Equity issued upon conversion of debt	$	—		$	35.6		$	2.8		$	35.6

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~XPO Logistics, Inc.~~

~~Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity~~

~~For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Series A Preferred Stock Common Stock Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
(Dollars in millions) Shares Amount Shares Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Deficit Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Cash Flow & Net Investment Hedges Employee Benefit Plans Non-controlling Interests Total
Balance, December 31, 2015 73
$ 42.0
109,523
$ 0.1
$ 3,212.3
$ (465.0 ) $ (61.8 ) $ 6.7
$ (17.2 ) $ 343.7
$ 3,060.8
Net loss —
—
—
—
—
(22.5 ) —
—
—
3.2
$ (19.3 )
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of $14.7 total tax effect —
—
—
—
—
—
44.1
(19.1 ) —
8.7
$ 33.7
Exercise of warrants and stock options and other —
—
213
—
0.4
—
—
—
—
—
$ 0.4
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of senior notes, net of tax —
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$ —
Dividend paid —
—
—
—
—
(0.7 ) —
—
—
—
$ (0.7 )
Stock compensation expense —
—
—
—
6.7
—
—
—
—
—
$ 6.7
Balance, March 31, 2016 73
$ 42.0
109,737
$ 0.1
$ 3,219.4
$ (488.2 ) $ (17.7 ) $ (12.4 ) $ (17.2 ) $ 355.6
$ 3,081.6

~~See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015~~

(Unaudited)

1. Organization

Nature of Business

XPO Logistics, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("XPO" or the "Company") ~~provide comprehensive supply chain solutions~~uses its integrated network of people, technology and physical assets to help its customers ~~which~~manage their goods more efficiently throughout their supply chains. The Company’s customers are multinational, national, mid-size and small enterprises, and include many of the most prominent companies in the world. XPO runs its business on a global basis, with two reportable segments: Transportation and Logistics.

In the Transportation segment, the Company provides multiple services to facilitate the movement of raw materials, parts and finished goods. The Company accomplishes this by using its proprietary transportation management technology, third-party carriers and Company-owned trucks. XPO’s transportation services include: freight brokerage, last mile, expedite, intermodal, less-than-truckload ("LTL"), full truckload, managed transportation and global forwarding services. Freight brokerage, last mile, expedite, intermodal, managed transportation and global forwarding are all non-asset or asset-light businesses. LTL and full truckload are asset-based.

In the Logistics segment, referred to as supply chain, the Company provides a range of contract logistics services, including highly engineered and customized solutions, value-added warehousing and distribution, and other inventory solutions. The Company performs e-commerce fulfillment, reverse logistics, storage, factory support, aftermarket support, integrated manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution and transportation. In addition, the Company utilizes technology and expertise to solve complex supply chain challenges and create transformative solutions for world-class customers, while reducing their operating costs and improving production flow management.

Substantially all of the Company’s businesses operate as the single global brand of XPO Logistics. Under the Company’s cross-selling initiative, all services are offered to all customers to fulfill their supply chain requirements, and multiple services are often combined into an optimal solution.

For specific financial information relating to the above segments, refer to Note ~~15—~~14—Segment Reporting.

2. Basis of Presentation ~~and Significant Accounting Policies~~

Basis of Presentation

These unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and should be read in conjunction with the Company's 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, significant accounting policies and other disclosures normally provided have been reduced or omitted. The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best available information, but actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Where the presentation of these intercompany eliminations differs between the consolidated and reportable segment financial statements, reconciliations of certain line items are provided. The results of operations of acquired companies are included in the Company’s results from the closing date of the acquisition and forward. ~~Income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interests is deducted from net income/loss to determine net income/loss attributable to common shareholders.~~

~~Significant Accounting Policies~~

~~Other Current Assets~~

~~The following table outlines the Company’s other current assets:~~

(Dollars in millions) March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Prepaid expenses $ 180.2
$ 142.3
Value-added tax and income tax receivables 111.7
115.8
Miscellaneous receivables 95.1
50.5
Inventory 50.6
48.9
Fixed assets held for sale 18.4
—
Other current assets 41.0
43.5
Total Other Current Assets $ 497.0
$ 401.0

~~Intangible Assets with Definite Lives~~

The Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization consist of customer relationships, trade names, non-compete agreements, and other intangibles. Customer relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis over the period of economic benefit based on the estimated cash flows attributable to the related intangible asset or on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the related intangible asset. Trade names are amortized on an accelerated basis over the period of economic benefit based on the estimated cash flows attributable to the related intangible assets. Non-compete agreements and other intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related intangible asset. The range of estimated useful lives and the weighted-average useful lives of the respective intangible assets by type are as follows:



~~Classification~~	~~Estimated Useful Life~~	~~Weighted-Average Amortization Period~~
~~Customer relationships~~	~~1.5 to 16 years~~	~~13.33 years~~
~~Trade names~~	~~1.2 to 3.5 years~~	~~2.86 years~~
~~Non-compete agreements~~	~~Term of agreement~~	~~4.57 years~~
~~Other intangible assets~~	~~1.5 to 5 years~~	~~4.24 years~~

~~For additional information refer to~~ ~~Note 7—Intangible Assets.~~

~~Accrued Expenses~~

~~The following table outlines the Company’s accrued expenses:~~

(Dollars in millions) March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Accrued salaries and wages $ 503.3
$ 558.6
Accrued transportation and facility charges 173.2
156.1
Accrued value-added tax and other taxes
169.1
153.3
Accrued insurance claims 107.8
95.3
Accrued estimated litigation liabilities 84.2
66.1
Accrued interest 74.2
56.8
Accrued purchased services 45.1
42.0
Accrued short-term restructuring costs 44.1
46.8
Accrued cash-settled restricted stock 18.6
19.3
Other accrued expenses
132.7
97.5
Total Accrued Expenses $ 1,352.3
$ 1,291.8

~~Other Current Liabilities~~

~~The following table outlines the Company’s other current liabilities:~~

(Dollars in millions) March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Deferred revenue $ 52.9
$ 62.4
Bank overdrafts 48.8
29.5
Employee benefits 35.4
38.7
Acquisition earn-out liability 21.8
21.8
Litigation costs 17.4
22.1
Income taxes payable 13.9
—
Current portion of interest rate swap liability 4.9
5.2
Other current liabilities 33.5
23.9
Total Other Current Liabilities $ 228.6
$ 203.6

Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

Level 2—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets; and

Level 3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable, generally utilizing pricing models or other valuation techniques that reflect management’s judgment and estimates.

The aggregate net fair value estimates are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective carrying value of certain financial instruments approximated their fair values as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and current maturities of long-term debt. Fair values approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short-term in nature ~~and~~or are receivable or payable on demand. The fair value of the asset financing arrangements ("Asset Financing") approximates carrying value since the debt is primarily issued at a floating rate, may be prepaid any time at par without penalty and the remaining life is short-term in nature.

Cash equivalents consist of short-term interest-bearing instruments (primarily ~~commercial paper,~~ certificates of deposit and money market funds) with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The carrying amounts for money market funds are a reasonable estimate of fair value and quoted market prices are available, and accordingly, are classified as Level 1 instruments. Commercial paper and certificates of deposit are generally valued using published interest rates for instruments with similar terms and maturities, and accordingly, are classified as Level 2 instruments. The fair value of the Company's Senior Notes due 2022, Senior Notes due 2021, Senior Notes due 2019, Senior Notes due 2018 (collectively described as the “Senior Notes” when referring to the Senior Notes due ~~2018,~~2022, Senior Notes due 2021, Senior Notes due 2019, ~~Senior Notes due 2021,~~ and Senior Notes due ~~2022)~~2018), Senior Debentures due 2034 (the “Senior Debentures”), and the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due October 1, 2017 (the “Convertible Notes”) was estimated using quoted market prices for identical instruments in active markets. The fair value of the Company's Term Loan Facility (the “Term Loan Facility”)~~, Senior Notes due 2021~~ and Euro private placement notes due 2020 (the “Euro Private Placement Notes”) was estimated using inputs that are readily available market inputs for long-term debt with similar terms and maturities. The Company's derivative instruments include over-the-counter derivatives that are primarily valued using models that rely on observable market inputs, such as currency exchange rates and yield curves. For additional information refer to Note ~~12—~~11—Derivative Instruments.

The following table summarizes the carrying value and valuation of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy:


	March 31, 2016										June 30, 2016
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
(In millions)											Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2
Financial Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	93.3	$	93.3	$	29.6	$	63.7	$	—	$	136.7	$	136.7	$	30.1	$	106.6
Financial Liabilities:
Senior Notes due 2022	1,577.7		1,568.0		1,568.0		—		—		1,578.4		1,525.0		1,525.0		—
Senior Notes due 2021	561.5		541.5		—		541.5		—		547.8		524.6		524.6		—
Senior Notes due 2019	900.3		936.0		936.0		—		—		900.3		922.5		922.5		—
Senior Notes due 2018	268.0		272.1		272.1		—		—		267.7		271.8		271.8		—
Term loan facility	1,537.9		1,600.0		—		1,600.0		—		1,535.7		1,591.0		—		1,591.0
Senior Debentures due 2034	199.5		219.0		219.0		—		—		199.9		198.2		198.2		—
Convertible senior notes	47.5		98.9		98.9		—		—		45.7		80.3		80.3		��
Euro private placement notes due 2020	15.0		14.9		—		14.9		—		14.6		14.6		—		14.6
Derivative instruments	42.8		42.8		—		42.8		—

	December 31, 2015										December 31, 2015
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
(In millions)											Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2
Financial Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	83.2	$	83.2	$	9.1	$	74.1	$	—	$	83.2	$	83.2	$	9.1	$	74.1
Financial Liabilities:
Senior Notes due 2022	1,577.0		1,479.8		1,479.8		—		—		1,577.0		1,479.8		1,479.8		—
Senior Notes due 2021	536.6		507.5		—		507.5		—		536.6		507.5		—		507.5
Senior Notes due 2019	900.4		920.3		920.3		—		—		900.4		920.3		920.3		—
Senior Notes due 2018	268.2		271.0		—		271.0		—		268.2		271.0		—		271.0
Term loan facility	1,540.3		1,590.0		—		1,590.0		—		1,540.3		1,590.0		—		1,590.0
Senior Debentures due 2034	199.0		201.0		—		201.0		—		199.0		201.0		—		201.0
Convertible senior notes	46.8		89.1		89.1		—		—		46.8		89.1		89.1		—
Euro private placement notes due 2020	14.5		13.9		—		13.9		—		14.5		13.9		—		13.9
Derivative instruments	8.8		8.8		—		8.8		—

New Accounting Standards

In May ~~2015,~~2014, the FASB issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. ~~2015-07, Fair Value Measurements~~2014-09, Revenue (Topic ~~820)~~606): ~~"Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)."~~“Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This ASU, ~~removes~~codified in the ~~requirement~~"Revenue Recognition" topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, requires revenue to ~~categorize within~~be recognized upon the ~~fair value hierarchy all investments~~transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for ~~which fair value~~those goods or services. The standard also requires disclosures sufficient to describe the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from these customer contracts. This standard is ~~measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. This ASU is~~ effective ~~retrospectively~~ for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, ~~2015. The Company's~~2017, with early adoption ~~of this standard in~~permitted for the first ~~quarter~~interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. This ASU can be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or with the cumulative effect of ~~2016 had no material~~initially applying the standard recognized on the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the method of application and the potential impact toon the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In ~~September 2015,~~February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015-16, Business Combinations~~2016-02, Leases (Topic ~~805): "Simplifying~~842). The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the ~~Accounting~~assets and liabilities that arise from leases, including operating leases. Under the new requirements, a lessee will recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and the right-of-use asset representing the right to the underlying asset for ~~Measurement-Period Adjustments," which simplifies how adjustments are made~~the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, the lessee is permitted to ~~provisional amounts recognized in a business combination during the measurement period.~~make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The standard is effective for ~~interim and annual periods~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2015.~~2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendment is permitted. The Company ~~adopted this~~is currently evaluating the standard inand the ~~first quarter of 2016. See~~ ~~Note 3 - Acquisitions~~ ~~for~~impact on the ~~current-quarter impact.~~consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): "Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),." ~~which~~This ASU clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company ~~will adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2018. The Company~~ is currently evaluating the standard and the impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): "Improvements to Employee Share-based Payment ~~Accounting,~~Accounting." ~~which~~This ASU involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under the new standard, income tax benefits and deficiencies are to be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. An entity should also recognize excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. Excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity. In regards to forfeitures, the entity may make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within that reporting period, however early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the standard and the impacts, if any, on ~~its~~the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3. Acquisitions

2015 Acquisitions

Con-way Inc.

On September 9, 2015, XPO entered into a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with Con-way Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Con-way"), and Canada Merger Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of XPO ("Merger Subsidiary"). Headquartered in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Con-way was a Fortune 500 company with a transportation and logistics network of 582 locations and approximately 30,000 employees serving over 36,000 customers.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, XPO caused Merger Subsidiary to commence a cash tender offer (the "Offer") for all of Con-way's outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.625 per share (the "Shares"), at a purchase price of $47.60 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any applicable withholding taxes. The Offer and withdrawal rights expired on October 30, 2015. A total of 46,150,072 Shares were validly tendered and not properly withdrawn pursuant to the Offer as of the expiration date, representing approximately 81.1% of the outstanding Shares. In addition, Notices of Guaranteed Delivery were delivered for 1,793,225 Shares, representing approximately 3.2% of the outstanding Shares. The number of Shares tendered satisfied the minimum condition, and all Shares that were validly tendered and not withdrawn pursuant to the Offer were accepted for payment. The fair value of the total consideration paid in the Offer and Merger Agreement was $2,317.8 million, net of cash acquired of $437.3 million, consisting of $2,706.6 million of cash paid at

the time of closing for the purchase of all of Con-way’s outstanding shares of common stock, $17.6 million representing the portion of replacement equity awards attributable to pre-acquisition service, and a $30.9 million liability for the settlement of certain Con-way stock-based compensation awards.

On October 30, 2015, following its acceptance of the tendered shares, XPO completed its acquisition of Con-way pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. Merger Subsidiary merged with and into Con-way, with Con-way continuing as the surviving corporation as a wholly owned subsidiary of XPO. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time each Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time was converted into the right to receive the purchase price other than Shares owned by (i) Con-way, XPO or Merger Subsidiary, which Shares have been canceled and cease to exist, (ii) any subsidiary of Con-way or XPO (other than Merger Subsidiary), which Shares have been converted into shares of common stock of the surviving corporation, or (iii) stockholders who validly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law with respect to such Shares. All Con-way shares not validly tendered into the Offer have been canceled and converted into the right to receive the same $47.60 per share, net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon and less any applicable withholding taxes, as was paid for all Shares that were validly tendered and not withdrawn in the Offer. Con-way shares have ceased trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

At the effective time (as specified in the Merger Agreement, the "Effective Time"), each Con-way stock option and stock appreciation right, whether vested or unvested, was converted into an option to purchase shares of XPO common stock or a stock appreciation right in respect of XPO common stock, as applicable, with the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such stock option or stock appreciation right immediately prior to the Effective Time, with the number of shares of XPO common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares) subject to such stock option or stock appreciation right equal to the product of (i) the total number of Shares underlying such stock option or stock appreciation right immediately prior to the Effective Time, multiplied by (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing the per share merger consideration by the volume-weighted average trading price of XPO common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the five consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the closing date (the "Equity Award Conversion Amount"), and with the exercise price applicable to such stock option or stock appreciation right to equal the quotient (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) obtained by dividing (a) the exercise price per Share applicable to such stock option or stock appreciation right immediately prior to the Effective Time, by (b) the Equity Award Conversion Amount.



(Dollars in millions)
Cash consideration	$	2,706.6
Liability for equity award settlement	30.9
Portion of replacement equity awards attributable to pre-acquisition service	17.6
Cash acquired	(437.3		)
Total consideration	$	2,317.8

The Con-way transaction was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC Topic 805 "Business Combinations." Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of October 30, 2015, with the remaining unallocated purchase price recorded as goodwill. Goodwill includes the expected synergies and cost rationalization from the merger of operations as well as intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition such as an assembled workforce.

The following table outlines the consideration transferred and purchase price allocation at the respective estimated fair values as of October 30, 2015:


(Dollars in millions)
Consideration	$	2,317.8		$	2,317.8
Accounts receivable	670.1			677.6
Other current assets	129.9			143.3
Property and equipment	1,892.3			1,864.6
Trade name	5.6			5.6
Customer relationships	641.0			641.0
Other long-term assets	48.5			53.5
Accounts payable	(354.6		)	(361.8		)
Accrued expenses	(383.5		)	(393.6		)
Other current liabilities	(27.5		)	(27.5		)
Long-term debt	(640.6		)	(640.6		)
Deferred tax liabilities	(619.4		)	(609.5		)
Employee benefit obligations	(153.5		)	(153.5		)
Other long-term liabilities	(197.4		)	(197.0		)
Goodwill	$	1,306.9		$	1,315.7

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and is based on information that is available to management at the time the condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared. The most significant open items include the fair value of property and equipment, favorable and unfavorable leasehold assets and liabilities, definite-lived intangible assets, assumed liabilities and taxes. Based on a preliminary allocation, ~~$1,025.7~~$1,034.5 million of the goodwill relates to the Transportation reportable segment and $281.2 million of the goodwill relates to the Logistics reportable segment. The goodwill as a result of the acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes.

~~During the first quarter of 2016, management updated their assumptions in the measurement of fair value for property and~~

equipment and customer relationships. The effect of this change was a $5.8 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense recorded during the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 which related to the three-month period ended December 31, 2015.

Norbert Dentressangle SA

On April 28, 2015, XPO entered into (1) a Share Purchase Agreement (the "Share Purchase Agreement") relating to Norbert Dentressangle SA ("ND"), a French société anonyme, among Dentressangle Initiatives, a French société par actions simplifiée, Mr. Norbert Dentressangle, Mrs. Evelyne Dentressangle, Mr. Pierre-Henri Dentressangle, Ms. Marine Dentressangle and XPO and (2) a Tender Offer Agreement (the "Tender Offer Agreement" and, together with the Share Purchase Agreement, the "ND Transaction Agreements") between XPO and ND. The ND Transaction Agreements provided for the acquisition of a majority stake in ND by XPO, followed by an all-cash simplified tender offer by XPO to acquire the remaining outstanding shares.

On June 8, 2015, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions of the Share Purchase Agreement, Dentressangle Initiatives, Mr. Norbert Dentressangle, Mrs. Evelyne Dentressangle, Mr. Pierre-Henri Dentressangle and Ms. Marine Dentressangle (collectively, the "Sellers") sold to XPO and XPO purchased from the Sellers (the "Share Purchase"), all of the

ordinary shares of ND owned by the Sellers, representing a total of approximately 67% of the share capital of ND and all of the outstanding share subscription warrants granted by ND to employees, directors or other officers of ND and its affiliates. Total cash consideration paid for the majority interest in the share capital of ND and settlement of the warrants was €1,437.0 million, or $1,603.9 million, excluding acquired debt. Consideration included only the portion of the fair value of the warrants attributable to service performed prior to the acquisition date. The remaining balance was recorded as compensation expense in the post-combination period. In conjunction with the Share Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to settle certain performance stock awards of ND. Similar to the warrants, the consideration of €11.8 million, or $13.2 million, included only the portion of the fair value attributable to service performed prior to the acquisition date with the balance recorded as compensation expense in the post-combination period. The performance share settlement will be paid in cash with 50% of the awards paid 18 months from the acquisition date and the remaining 50% paid in 36 months. Further, as a result of the acquisition, the Company repaid certain indebtedness and related interest rate swap liabilities of ND totaling €628.5 million, or $705.0 million.

On June 11, 2015, XPO filed with the French Autorité des Marchés Financiers (the "AMF") a mandatory simplified cash offer (the "Tender Offer") to purchase all of the outstanding ordinary shares of ND (other than the shares already owned by XPO) at a price of €217.50 per share. On June 23, 2015, the Company received the necessary approval from the AMF to launch the Tender Offer and the Tender Offer was launched on June 25, 2015. The Tender Offer remained open for a period of 16 trading days. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company purchased 1,921,553 shares under the Tender Offer and acquired a total of

approximately 86.25% of the share capital of ND. The total fair value of the consideration provided for the noncontrolling interest in ND at the acquisition date is €702.5 million, or $784.2 million, which is based on the quoted market price of ND shares on the acquisition date. Total consideration is summarized in the table below in Euros ("EUR") and USD:



(In millions)	In EUR			In USD
Cash consideration	€	1,437.0		$	1,603.9
Liability for performance share settlement	11.8			13.2
Repayment of indebtedness	628.5			705.0
Noncontrolling interests	702.5			784.2
Cash acquired	(134.6		)	(151.0		)
Total consideration	€	2,645.2		$	2,955.3

The ND Share Purchase was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC Topic 805 "Business Combinations." Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of June 8, 2015, with the remaining unallocated purchase price recorded as goodwill. Goodwill includes the expected synergies and cost rationalization from the merger of operations as well as intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition such as an assembled workforce. The following table outlines the consideration transferred and purchase price allocation at the respective estimated fair values as of June 8, 2015:


(Dollars in millions)
(In millions)
Consideration	$	2,955.3		$	2,955.3
Accounts receivable	1,060.4			1,058.5
Other current assets	350.1			353.6
Deferred tax assets	27.2			44.6
Property and equipment	730.7			706.1
Trade name covenants	40.0			40.0
Non-compete agreements	5.6			5.6
Customer relationships	827.0			827.0
Other long-term assets	63.6			57.1
Accounts payable	(804.1		)	(806.0		)
Accrued expenses	(422.8		)	(428.2		)
Other current liabilities	(164.6		)	(131.8		)
Long-term debt	(643.4		)	(643.4		)
Deferred tax liabilities	(245.5		)	(237.7		)
Employee benefit obligations	(142.3		)	(142.3		)
Other long-term liabilities	(148.8		)	(177.2		)
Noncontrolling interests	(37.2		)	(37.2		)
Goodwill	$	2,459.4		$	2,466.6

~~As of March 31, 2016, the most significant open items related to the~~The purchase price allocation include the fair value of property and equipment, favorable and unfavorable leasehold assets and liabilities, definite-lived intangible assets, assumed liabilities and taxes. Based on a preliminary allocation, $961.9is considered final. Approximately $962.4 million of the final goodwill relates to the Transportation reportable segment and ~~$1,497.5~~$1,504.2 million of the goodwill relates to the Logistics reportable segment. The goodwill as a result of the ND acquisition is not deductible for local country income tax purposes. The Company allocated the purchase price from its acquisition of ND down to the legal entities resulting in deferred tax assets and liabilities which on a jurisdictional basis have been netted. The jurisdictional netting resulted in a reduction of both deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities of $116.0 million during the first quarter of 2016, and had no impact on goodwill.

Bridge Terminal Transport Services, Inc.

On May 4, 2015, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with BTTS Holding Corporation to acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Bridge Terminal Transport Services, Inc. ("BTT"), a leading asset-light drayage provider in the United States. The closing of the transaction was effective on June 1, 2015. The fair value of the total consideration paid under the BTT Stock Purchase Agreement was $103.8 million and consisted of $103.1 million of cash paid at the time of closing, including an estimate of the working capital adjustment, and $0.7 million of equity.

The BTT acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC Topic 805 "Business Combinations." Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of June 1, 2015, with the remaining unallocated purchase price recorded as goodwill. As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of ~~$57.0~~$56.5 million and definite-lived intangible assets of $30.0 million. All goodwill

relates to the Transportation reportable segment and is not deductible for income tax purposes. ~~As of March 31, 2016, the~~The purchase price allocation is considered ~~final, except for the fair value of taxes and assumed liabilities.~~final.

UX Specialized Logistics

On February 9, 2015, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Earlybird Delivery Systems, LLC to acquire certain assets of UX Specialized Logistics, LLC ("UX"). The fair value of the total consideration paid under the UX Asset Purchase Agreement was $58.9 million and consisted of $58.1 million of cash paid at the time of closing, including an

estimate of the working capital adjustment, and $0.8 million of equity. UX provided last mile logistics and same day delivery services for major retail chains and e-commerce companies.

The UX acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC Topic 805 "Business Combinations." Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair values as of February 9, 2015, with the remaining unallocated purchase price recorded as goodwill. As a result of the UX acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $38.1 million and definite-lived intangible assets of $18.8 million. All goodwill relates to the Transportation reportable segment and is fully deductible for income tax purposes. ~~As of March 31, 2016, the~~The purchase price allocation is considered final.

Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the ~~three-month~~six-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015 present consolidated information of the Company as if the acquisitions of Con-way and ND had occurred as of January 1, 2015:


	Historical Three Months Ended			Pro Forma Three Months Ended			Pro Forma Six Months Ended
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)	March 31, 2016			March 31, 2015			June 30, 2015
Revenue	$	3,545.7		$	3,542.3		$	7,270.7
Operating income	$	62.4		$	52.2		$	149.7
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(23.2	)	$	(34.9	)
Net loss							$	(50.9	)
Basic loss per share	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.44	)
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.44	)

The unaudited pro forma consolidated results for the ~~three-month~~six-month period were prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and are based on the historical financial information of Con-way, ND and the Company. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results incorporate historical financial information for all significant acquisitions pursuant to SEC regulations since January 1, 2015. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma adjustments that are: (i) directly attributable to the acquisition, (ii) factually supportable and (iii) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results are not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s consolidated results of operations actually would have been had it completed these acquisitions on January 1, 2015.

4. Restructuring Charges

In conjunction with various acquisitions, the Company has initiated facility rationalization and severance programs to close facilities and reduce employment in order to improve efficiency and profitability or adjust for the loss of certain business. ~~The programs include facility exit activities and employment reduction initiatives.~~

The amount of restructuring charges incurred during the ~~three-month~~six-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, and included in the Company's consolidated statement of operations as sales, general and administrative expense, direct operating expense, and cost of transportation and services, is summarized below.


			Three months ended March 31, 2016									Six months ended June 30, 2016
(Dollars in millions)	Reserve Balance at December 31, 2015		Charges Incurred		Payments			Reserve Balance at March 31, 2016
(In millions)										Reserve Balance at December 31, 2015		Charges Incurred		Payments			Reserve Balance at June 30, 2016
Transportation
Contract termination	$	0.1	$	0.2	$	—		$	0.3	$	0.1	$	—	$	—		$	0.1
Facilities	0.6		0.1		(0.2		)	0.5		0.6		0.5		(0.2		)	0.9
Severance	26.7		0.4		(6.2		)	20.9		26.7		4.6		(22.2		)	9.1
Total	27.4		0.7		(6.4		)	21.7		27.4		5.1		(22.4		)	10.1
Logistics
Contract termination	0.8		0.4		(0.5		)	0.7		0.8		—		(0.7		)	0.1
Severance	25.5		6.4		(4.8		)	27.1		25.5		13.0		(11.5		)	27.0
Total	26.3		6.8		(5.3		)	27.8		26.3		13.0		(12.2		)	27.1
Corporate
Contract termination	4.0		—		(1.2		)	2.8		4.0		—		(2.1		)	1.9
Severance	3.5		—		(0.3		)	3.2		3.5		0.6		(3.4		)	0.7
Total	7.5		—		(1.5		)	6.0		7.5		0.6		(5.5		)	2.6
Total	$	61.2	$	7.5	$	(13.2	)	$	55.5	$	61.2	$	18.7	$	(40.1	)	$	39.8

5. Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is involved, and will continue to be involved, in numerous legal proceedings arising out of the conduct of its business. These proceedings may include, among other matters, claims for property damage or personal injury incurred in connection with the transportation of freight, claims regarding anti-competitive practices, and employment-related claims, including claims involving asserted breaches of employee restrictive covenants and tortious interference with contract. These proceedings also include numerous purported class-action lawsuits, multi-plaintiff and individual lawsuits and state tax and other administrative proceedings that claim either that the Company’s owner operators or contract carriers should be treated as employees, rather than independent contractors, or that certain of the Company's drivers were not paid for all compensable time or were not provided with required meal or rest breaks. These lawsuits and proceedings may seek substantial monetary damages (including claims for unpaid wages, overtime, failure to provide meal and rest periods, unreimbursed business expenses and other items), injunctive relief, or both.

The Company establishes accruals for specific legal proceedings when it is considered probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for loss contingencies are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as additional information becomes available. In connection with certain acquisitions of privately-held businesses, the Company has retained purchase price holdbacks or escrows to provide security for a negotiated duration with respect to damages incurred in connection with pre-acquisition claims and litigation matters. If a loss is not both probable and reasonably estimable, or if an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued therefor or the applicable purchase price holdback or escrow, the Company assesses whether there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss, or additional loss, may have been incurred. If there is a reasonable possibility that a loss, or additional loss, may have been incurred, the Company discloses the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss if it is material and an estimate can be made, or states that such an estimate cannot be made. The evaluation as to whether a loss is reasonably possible or probable is based on the Company’s assessment, in conjunction with legal counsel, regarding the ultimate outcome of the matter.

The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for, or has adequate purchase price holdbacks or escrows with respect to, the potential impact of loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of any matters to which the Company is presently a party will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Legal costs incurred related to these matters are expensed as incurred.

The Company carries liability and excess umbrella insurance policies that it deems sufficient to cover potential legal claims arising in the normal course of conducting its operations as a transportation company. The liability and excess umbrella

insurance policies do not cover the misclassification claims described in this Note. In the event the Company is required to satisfy a legal claim outside the scope of the coverage provided by insurance, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be negatively impacted.

Intermodal Drayage Classification Claims

Certain of the Company’s intermodal drayage subsidiaries received notices from the California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (the "DLSE"), that a total of approximately 150 owner operators contracted with these subsidiaries filed claims in 2012 with the DLSE in which they assert that they should be classified as employees, rather than independent contractors. These claims seek reimbursement for the owner operators’ business expenses, including fuel, tractor maintenance and tractor lease payments. After a decision was rendered by a DLSE hearing officer in seven of these claims, in 2014, the Company appealed the decision to California Superior Court, San Diego, where a de novo trial was held on the merits of those claims. On July 17, 2015, the court issued a final statement of decision finding that the seven claimants were employees rather than independent contractors, and awarding an aggregate of $2.9 million plus post-judgment interest and attorneys' fees to the claimants. The Company appealed this judgment, but cannot provide assurance that such appeal will be successful. Separate decisions were rendered in June 2015 by a DLSE hearing officer in claims involving five additional plaintiffs, resulting in an award for the plaintiffs in an aggregate amount of approximately $0.9 million, following which the Company has appealed the decisions in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. These proceedings are currently in the discovery phase. The remaining DLSE claims (the "Pending DLSE Claims") have been transferred to California Superior Court in three separate actions involving approximately 200 claimants, including the approximately 150 claimants mentioned above. These matters are in the initial procedural stages. The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for the potential impact of loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable relating to the ~~Pending DLSE Claims.~~claims referenced above. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of its accrued liability that it may incur as a result of ~~the Pending DLSE Claims.~~these claims.

One of ~~these~~the Company's intermodal drayage subsidiaries also is a party to a putative class action litigation (Manuela Ruelas Mendoza v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.) brought by Edwin Molina on August 19, 2013 and currently pending in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California. Mr. Molina asserts that he should be classified as an employee, rather than an independent contractor, and seeks damages for alleged violation of various California wage and hour laws. Mr. Molina seeks to have the litigation certified

as a class action involving all owner-operators contracted with this subsidiary at any time from August 2009 to the present, which could involve as many as 625 claimants. Certain of these potential claimants also may have Pending DLSE Claims. The Company has reached an agreement to settle this litigation with the claimant. The settlement agreement ~~has been conditionally approved~~is subject to final approval by the court but remains subject to acceptance by a minimum percentage of members of the purported class. There can be no assurance that the settlement agreement will be accepted by the requisite percentage of members of the purported class.Court. The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for the potential impact of loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable relating to these claims.

~~Another of the Company’s intermodal drayage subsidiaries is a party to a putative class action litigation (C. Arevalo v. XPO Port Services, Inc.~~) brought by Carlos Arevalo in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles Central District filed in August 2015. Mr. Arevalo asserts that he should be classified as an employee, rather than an independent contractor, and seeks damages for alleged violation of various California wage and hour laws. Mr. Arevalo seeks to have the litigation certified as a class action involving all owner-operators contracted with this subsidiary at any time from August 2011 to the present. Certain of these potential claimants also may have Pending DLSE Claims. This matter is in the initial pleading stage and the court has not yet determined whether to certify the matter as a class action. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of its accrued liability that it may incur as a result of these claims.

There are other putative class action litigation matters pending against the Company’s intermodal drayage subsidiaries in which the plaintiffs claim they should have been classified as employees, rather than independent contractors, and seek damages for alleged violations of various California wage and hour laws. The particular claims asserted vary from case to case, but the claims generally allege unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, or failure to provide meal and rest periods, and seek reimbursement of the contract carriers’ business expenses. These cases include the following matters filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, Los Angeles District: C. Arevalo v. XPO Port Services, Inc. filed in August 2015; H. Lopez v. PDS Transportation filed in January 2016; M. Cortez v. Pacer filed in June 2016; and the following case filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California: I. Hernandez v. Pacer filed in May 2016. Certain of these potential claimants also may have Pending DLSE Claims, and may be subject to binding arbitration obligations. These matters are in the initial pleading stage and the courts have not yet determined whether to certify the matters as a class action. The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for the potential impact of loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable relating to these claims. The Company is unable at this ~~matter.~~time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of its accrued liability that it may incur as a result of these claims.

Last Mile Logistics Classification Claims

Certain of the Company’s last mile logistics subsidiaries are party to several putative class action litigations brought by independent contract carriers contracted with these subsidiaries in which the contract carriers assert that they should be classified as employees, rather than independent contractors. The particular claims asserted vary from case to case, but the claims generally allege unpaid wages, unpaid overtime, or failure to provide meal and rest periods, and seek reimbursement of the contract carriers’ business expenses. Putative class actions against the Company’s subsidiaries are pending in California (Fernando Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics Corp., filed in May 2005, currently in the Federal District Court, Southern District of ~~California; and~~California, Ron Carter, Juan Estrada, Jerry Green, Burl Malmgren, Bill McDonald and Joel Morales v. XPO Logistics, Inc., filed in March 2016 in the Federal District Court, Northern District of ~~California),~~California, and Ramon Garcia v. Macy’s and XPO

Logistics, filed in July 2016 in Superior Court of the State of California, Alameda County); New Jersey (Leonardo Alegre v. Atlantic Central Logistics, Simply Logistics, Inc., filed in March 2015 in the Federal District Court, New Jersey),; Pennsylvania (Victor Reyes v. XPO Logistics, Inc., filed in May 2015 in the U.S. District Court, Pennsylvania); and Connecticut (Carlos Taveras v. XPO Last Mile, Inc., filed in November 2015 in the Federal District Court, Connecticut). The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for the potential impact of loss contingencies relating to the foregoing claims that are probable and reasonably estimable. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of its accrued liability that it may incur as a result of these claims.

~~During the first quarter of 2016, the Company completed the settlement of multi-plaintiff actions in Massachusetts (Celso Martins, Alexandre Rocha, and Calvin Anderson v. 3PD, Inc.~~ ~~filed in July 2011 in Massachusetts State Court) and Illinois (Marvin Brandon, Rafael Aguilera, and Aldo Mendez-Etzig v. 3PD, Inc.~~ ~~filed in May 2013 in the Federal District Court, Northern District of Illinois).~~

Last Mile TCPA Claims

The Company is a party to a putative class action litigation (Leung v. XPO Logistics, Inc., filed in May 2015 in the U.S. District Court, Illinois) alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") related to an automated customer call system used by a last mile logistics business that the Company acquired. ~~The Company has asserted indemnity rights pursuant to the agreement by which it acquired this business, subject to certain limits.~~ This matter is in the initial pleading stage and the court has not yet determined whether to certify the matter as a class action. The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for the potential impact of loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable relating to this matter. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of its accrued liability that it may incur as a result of this matter.

Less-Than-Truckload Meal Break Claims

The Company’s LTL subsidiary is a party to several class action litigations alleging violations of the state of California's wage and hour laws. Plaintiffs allege failure to provide drivers with required meal breaks and rest breaks. Plaintiffs seek to recover unspecified monetary damages, penalties, interest and attorneys’ fees. The primary case is Jose Alberto Fonseca Pina, et al. v. Con-way Freight Inc., et al. (the "Pina case"). The Pina case was initially filed in November 2009 in Monterey County Superior Court and was removed to the U.S. District Court of California, Northern District. The Company has reached a tentative agreement to settle the Pina case, subject to execution of a settlement agreement, court approval and acceptance by a minimum percentage of members of the purported class. There can be no assurance that the settlement agreement will be finalized and executed, that the court will approve any such settlement agreement or that it will be accepted by the requisite percentage of members of the purported class. The Company believes that it has adequately accrued for the potential impact of

loss contingencies that are probable and reasonably estimable relating to ~~the~~ ~~Pina~~ ~~case.~~this matter. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the amount of the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of its accrued liability that it may incur as a result of these claims.

~~Con-way Acquisition Litigation~~

~~On October 7, 2015, a purported stockholder of Con-way filed a putative class action complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, captioned~~ ~~Abrams v. Espe, et al.,~~ C.A. No. 11585-VCN. The complaint named the members of the board of directors of Con-way, XPO and an affiliate, and Citigroup Inc., financial advisor to Con-way in connection with the proposed acquisition, as defendants. The complaint alleged that the directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to maximize shareholder value in connection with the proposed transaction and failing to disclose certain information in the Schedule 14D-9 of Con-way relating to the proposed acquisition. The complaint also alleged that the other defendants aided and abetted those alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The lawsuit sought, among other relief, a preliminary injunction, rescissory damages and recovery of the costs of the action, including reasonable attorneys' and experts' fees. On February 24, 2016, the plaintiff filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order requesting dismissal of the action, and further noting their intent to submit an application for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. On February 24, 2016, the Delaware court granted the Order, retaining jurisdiction solely for the purpose of determining plaintiff’s counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. The Company has agreed to pay fees and expenses of plaintiff’s counsel, and plaintiff’s counsel has agreed not to make any application to the Court for additional attorneys’ fees and expenses. This fee has not been in any way approved or ruled upon by the Court of Chancery.

~~XPO Logistics Worldwide Government Services Investigation~~

On June 11, 2014, XPO Logistics Worldwide Government Services, LLC, formerly known as Menlo Worldwide Government Services, LLC ("Government Services"), a subsidiary of the contract logistics business that the Company acquired through the Con-way transaction, received a subpoena ~~duces tecum~~ from the U.S. Department of Defense Inspector General requesting records relating to an investigation into compliance with the terms and conditions of its contractual arrangements with the United States Transportation Command (the "DTCI Contract") for work performed prior to the acquisition of Government Services by the Company. Government Services received a follow-on Civil Investigative Demand from the U.S. Department of Justice dated September 30, 2015, related to the same or related matters. On April 23, 2016, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the United States Department of Justice regarding the foregoing investigation. The settlement fully resolves disputed charges under the DTCI Contract, and all related claims have been dismissed with prejudice, waived and released. The Company denied that any wrongdoing occurred.

6. Property and Equipment

The following table outlines the Company’s property and equipment:


(Dollars in millions)	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
(In millions)							June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Property and Equipment
Land	$	363.6		$	359.5		$	391.9		$	359.5
Buildings and leasehold improvements	477.7			476.8			472.6			476.8
Vehicles, tractors, trailers and tankers	1,496.1			1,440.5			1,489.1			1,440.5
Machinery and equipment	342.2			325.9			356.7			325.9
Office and warehouse equipment	87.3			79.5			84.2			79.5
Computer software and equipment	403.3			379.3			424.1			379.3
	3,170.2			3,061.5			3,218.6			3,061.5
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(349.9		)	(209.3		)
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization							(464.1		)	(209.3		)
Total Property and Equipment, net	$	2,820.3		$	2,852.2		$	2,754.5		$	2,852.2

Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of computer software was ~~$119.5~~$116.0 million and ~~$15.8~~$26.5 million for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $235.5 million and $42.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net book value of capitalized internally-developed software totaled ~~$126.5~~$125.3 million and $122.8 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

7. Intangible Assets

The following table outlines the Company’s identifiable intangible assets:


	March 31, 2016				December 31, 2015				June 30, 2016				December 31, 2015
(Dollars in millions)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
(In millions)									Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Definite-lived intangibles
Customer relationships	$	1,889.8	$	212.8	$	2,017.0	$	174.4	$	1,867.4	$	251.1	$	2,017.0	$	174.4
Trade name	52.1		33.7		51.0		29.1		50.2		36.5		51.0		29.1
Non-compete agreements	16.4		7.7		18.7		6.8		16.2		8.8		18.7		6.8
Carrier relationships	12.1		12.1		12.1		12.1		12.1		12.1		12.1		12.1
Other intangible assets	2.2		2.1		2.2		2.1		2.2		2.1		2.2		2.1
	$	1,972.6	$	268.4	$	2,101.0	$	224.5	$	1,948.1	$	310.6	$	2,101.0	$	224.5

~~Estimated future amortization expense for~~The range of estimated useful lives and the weighted-average useful lives of the respective intangible assets ~~for the remaining nine months of 2016 and next four years is~~by type are as follows:

(Dollars in millions) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Estimated amortization expense $ 133.8
$ 166.1
$ 158.1
$ 151.8
$ 145.7

Actual amounts of amortization expense may differ from estimated amounts due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, additional intangible asset acquisitions, impairment of intangible assets, accelerated amortization of intangible assets and other events.



Classification	Estimated Useful Life	Weighted-Average Amortization Period
Customer relationships	1.5 to 16 years	13.33 years
Trade names	1.2 to 3.5 years	2.86 years
Non-compete agreements	Term of agreement	4.60 years
Other intangible assets	1.5 to 5 years	4.24 years

Intangible asset amortization expense recorded in sales, general and administrative expense was ~~$42.0~~$44.1 million and ~~$18.0~~$29.6 million for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $86.1 million and $47.6 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

8. Goodwill

The following table shows changes in the gross carrying amounts of goodwill. The current period additions are the result of adjustments related to prior year acquisitions for which the measurement period remains open.

(Dollars in millions) Transportation Logistics Total
Goodwill at December 31, 2015 $ 2,504.7
$ 2,105.9
$ 4,610.6
Property and equipment and intangible asset fair value adjustments 145.2
37.4
182.6
Deferred tax adjustments (58.0 ) (18.5 ) (76.5 )
Litigation liability adjustments, net of tax 13.7
0.6
14.3
Impact of foreign exchange translation 19.9
30.9
50.8
Other adjustments 4.1
1.1
5.2
Goodwill at March 31, 2016 $ 2,629.6
$ 2,157.4
$ 4,787.0



(In millions)	Transportation			Logistics			Total
Goodwill at December 31, 2015	$	2,504.7		$	2,105.9		$	4,610.6
Property and equipment and intangible asset fair value adjustments	157.9			62.2			220.1
Other fair value adjustments	28.1			(21.3		)	6.8
Impact of foreign exchange translation	1.1			(20.4		)	(19.3		)
Deferred tax and other tax adjustments	(61.3		)	(24.9		)	(86.2		)
Goodwill at June 30, 2016	$	2,630.5		$	2,101.5		$	4,732.0

9. ~~Employee Benefit Plans~~

~~Defined Benefit Pension Plans~~

In the periods presented, certain employees of XPO and its subsidiaries in the U.S. and the UK were covered under one of several retirement plans. The Company did not have defined benefit pension plans prior to June 2015.

~~The following table outlines the amount of net periodic benefit expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016:~~

(Dollars in millions) U.S. Qualified Plans U.S. Non-Qualified Plans UK Plans
Net periodic benefit expense (income):
Interest cost $ 19.0
$ 0.8
$ 11.5
Expected return on plan assets (22.1 ) —
(14.9 )
Net periodic benefit expense (income) $ (3.1 ) $ 0.8
$ (3.4 )

~~The Company has not contributed to and has no plans to contribute to its U.S. Plans in 2016. The Company has contributed~~

~~$3.2 million to its UK Plans through March 31, 2016, and estimates it will contribute $15.1 million in aggregate to its UK Plans in 2016.~~

~~Defined Contribution Retirement Plans~~

The Company’s cost for defined contribution retirement plans was $14.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. The Company did not have significant defined contribution retirement plan costs in the first quarter of 2015.

~~Postretirement Medical Plan~~

~~As a result of the Company’s acquisition of Con-way as described in~~ ~~Note 3—Acquisitions, the Company sponsors a postretirement medical plan. The following table sets forth the amount of net periodic benefit expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016:~~

(Dollars in millions) Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Net periodic benefit expense:
Service cost - benefits earned during the year $ 0.2
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 0.5
Net periodic benefit expense $ 0.7

~~10.~~ Stock-Based Compensation

~~During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the~~The Company recognized the following stock-based compensation expense in direct operating expense and sales, general and administrative expense:


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2016		2015
(In millions)					2016			2015		2016		2015
Stock options	$	0.4	$	0.5	$	0.3		$	0.8	$	0.7	$	1.3
Stock appreciation rights	0.4		—		(0.4		)	—		—		—
Restricted stock units	4.7		1.2		2.8			1.0		7.5		2.2
Performance-based restricted stock units	1.6		0.6		2.5			12.8		4.1		13.4
Cash-settled performance-based restricted stock units	4.8		—		3.4			—		8.2		—
Warrants					—			8.5		—		8.5
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	11.9	$	2.3	$	8.6		$	23.1	$	20.5	$	25.4

On June 30, 2016, the Company granted 338,164 performance-based restricted stock units ("PRSU") at a fair value of $26.26 per unit. The awards contain both a service and performance condition, with a three year vesting period and awards vesting based on the achievement of certain targets with respect to the Company's financial performance for specified periods.

The Company did not realize any excess tax benefit for tax deductions from the stock-based compensation plan in the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015.

~~Stock Options~~

~~A summary of stock option award activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 is presented below:~~

Stock Options
Number of Stock Options Weighted-Average Exercise Price Exercise Price Range Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Weighted-Average Remaining Term

Outstanding at December 31, 2015 2,004,280
$ 16.66
$2.68 - $31.88 $ 6.06
4.57
Exercised (97,565 ) 19.91
$2.68 - $25.18 6.90

Forfeited or expired (180,848 ) 29.70
$27.69 - $29.79 1.53

Outstanding at March 31, 2016 1,725,867
$ 15.11
$3.88 - $31.88 $ 6.54
4.96
Options exercisable at March 31, 2016 1,408,612
$ 14.76
$3.88 - $31.88 $ 6.01
4.50

As of March 31, 2016, the Company had 1,408,612 options vested and exercisable and $1.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options. The intrinsic value of options vested and exercisable at March 31, 2016 was $22.5 million. The remaining estimated compensation expense related to the existing stock options is as follows:

(Dollars in millions) 2016 2017 2018 2019
Remaining estimated compensation expense related to existing stock options $ 0.8
$ 0.6
$ 0.4
$ 0.1

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0.8 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The total cash received from options exercised was $1.9 million and $0.1 million during the three-month periods ending March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

~~Stock Appreciation Rights~~

In connection with the Con-way transaction, the Company assumed all stock appreciation rights ("SARs") held by Con-way employees. Each SAR was converted into an equivalent number of SARs with the same terms and conditions as were applicable prior to the acquisition. All converted SARs were fully vested as of the acquisition date. The SARs are liability-classified awards, and as a result, the Company re-measures the fair value of the awards each reporting period until the awards are settled. The Company recognizes any changes in fair value as compensation cost in the current period. The ultimate expense recognized for the SARs is equal to the intrinsic value at settlement. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had recognized accrued liabilities for cash-settled SARs of $2.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively, using a weighted-average fair value per SAR of $16.55 and $13.45, respectively.

~~The following table summarizes SAR activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016:~~

Stock Appreciation Rights
Number of Rights Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Term

Outstanding at December 31, 2015 143,603
$ 15.61
1.79
Exercised (6,299 ) 15.61
—
Outstanding at March 31, 2016 137,304
$ 15.61
1.43
SARs exercisable at March 31, 2016 137,304
15.61
1.43

~~The intrinsic value of SARs outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2016 was $2.1 million.~~

~~Restricted Stock Units and Performance-based Restricted Stock Units~~

~~A summary of restricted stock units ("RSU") and performance-based restricted stock units ("PRSU") award activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 is presented below:~~

Restricted Stock Units Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
Number of Restricted Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Performance-based Restricted
Stock Units Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2015 1,558,441
$ 23.01
1,987,060
$ 21.47
Granted 45,507
26.47
—
—
Vested (95,220 ) 30.17
(103,530 ) 32.47
Forfeited (79,816 ) 26.02
(14,505 ) 30.03
Outstanding at March 31, 2016 1,428,912
$ 22.49
1,869,025
$ 18.21

The total fair value of RSUs vested during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Of the 1,428,912 outstanding RSUs, 1,229,948 vest subject to service conditions and 198,964 vest subject to service and market conditions.

The total fair value of PRSUs vested during the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 was $2.3 million. Of the 1,869,025 outstanding PRSUs, 1,632,869 vest subject to service and a combination of market and performance conditions and 236,156 vest subject to service and performance conditions.

~~As of March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company had approximately ~~$20.9~~$31.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested ~~RSU~~restricted stock unit ("RSU") and PRSU compensation that is anticipated to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately ~~2.26~~3 years. ~~Remaining estimated compensation expense related to outstanding RSUs and PRSUs is as follows:~~

(Dollars in millions) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 and Thereafter
Remaining estimated compensation expense related to outstanding RSUs and PRSUs deemed probable $ 10.8
$ 5.8
$ 2.5
$ 0.4
$ 1.4

~~The remaining estimated compensation expense excludes the impact of $21.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to PRSUs not deemed probable as of March 31, 2016.~~

Cash-settled Performance-based Restricted Stock Units

In February 2016, the Company entered into Employment Agreements (the "Agreements") with ~~certain~~its executive officers. The Agreements provide for cash-settled PRSU grants under the XPO Logistics Inc. Amended and Restated 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan to each of the executive officers effective February 9, 2016. Twenty-five percent of the PRSUs vest and are settled in cash on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant, subject to the ~~officer's~~officers' continued employment through the applicable anniversary and achievement of certain performance targets for each tranche. Cash-settled PRSU awards are measured at fair value initially based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant and are required to be re-measured to fair value at each reporting date until settlement. Compensation expense for cash-settled PRSUs is recognized over the applicable performance periods based on the probability of achievement of the performance conditions and the closing price of the Company’s common stock at each balance sheet date. The cost of a probable cash-settled PRSU award is recorded as a liability until settled. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company had granted 2,486,912 cash-settled PRSUs at a weighted-average fair value of $22.92 and recognized accrued liabilities ~~for cash-settled PRSUs~~ of ~~$4.8~~$8.2 million using a weighted-average fair value per PRSU of ~~$30.70.~~

~~The following table summarizes cash-settled PRSU activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016:~~

Cash-settled Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
Number of Cash-settled Performance-based Restricted Stock Units Weighted-Average Fair Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2015 —
$ —
Granted 2,486,912
22.92
Outstanding at March 31, 2016 2,486,912
$ 30.70
$26.26.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company had approximately ~~$71.6~~$57.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested cash-settled PRSU compensation that is anticipated to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately ~~3.75 years.~~

~~Remaining estimated compensation expense related to outstanding cash-settled PRSUs is as follows:~~

(Dollars in millions) 2016 2017 2018 2019
Remaining estimated compensation expense related to outstanding cash-settled PRSUs $ 14.3
$ 19.1
$ 19.1
$ 19.1

~~The above amounts of unrecognized compensation expense are estimated based on the assumed achievement of each performance target and the market value of the Company's common stock at March 31, 2016~~3.5 years and will vary based on changes in the Company's common stock price and probability of achievement of performance targets in future periods.

~~11.~~10. Income Taxes

For the ~~three~~three- and six- months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $33.0 million and $17.3 million, respectively, yielding an effective tax rate of 39.6% and 35.7%, respectively. The effective tax rates differ from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% in the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to higher income before income taxes, an increase in valuation allowances on state and foreign net operating losses for which tax benefits are not utilized, and changes in geographic earnings mix.

For the three- and six-months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of ~~$15.7~~$9.5 million and $23.2 million, respectively, yielding an effective tax rate of ~~44.9%~~10.8% and 19.9%. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% in the ~~three-month period~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~March 31, 2016~~June 30, 2015 primarily due to an increase in the valuation ~~allowances established~~allowance on state and foreign net operating losses ~~where is it more likely than~~for which tax benefits are not realized, the deferred tax assets will not be utilized, non-deductible transaction costs and the mix of income among the jurisdictions in which the Company does business with statutory tax rates that differ from the U.S. rate.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $13.6 million yielding an effective tax rate of 48.1%. The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35%non-taxable holdback liability in the ~~three-month period ended March 31, 2015 primarily due to the non-taxable nature of a holdback liability release related to the initial acquisition of the~~

~~Company's last mile~~Last Mile logistics platform, a change in estimate of realization on prior tax positions, and changes in geographic earnings mix.

In determining valuation allowances, an assessment of positive and negative evidence was performed regarding realization of the ~~change~~net deferred tax assets in accordance with ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This assessment included the ~~mix or income among~~evaluation of scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, the ~~jurisdictions in which~~availability of carry forwards and estimates of projected future taxable income. Based on the ~~Company does business.~~

~~The Company had~~assessment, as of June 30, 2016, total valuation allowances of ~~approximately $71.1~~$71.6 million ~~and $67.6 million as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, on the~~were recorded against deferred tax ~~assets generated for federal, state and foreign net operating losses where~~assets. Although realization is not assured, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will ~~not~~ be ~~utilized. There is~~realized and as such no ~~portion~~valuation allowance has been provided on these assets.

As of ~~these valuation allowances representing activity reported in other comprehensive income as of March 31,~~June 30, 2016, ~~or December 31, 2015. In evaluating the Company’s ability~~our foreign subsidiaries have undistributed earnings which could be subject to ~~realize its deferred income tax assets, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including operating results, ongoing tax planning, and the reversal of deferred~~taxation if repatriated. Deferred tax liabilities ~~on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis.~~

~~In general,~~have not been recorded for such earnings because it is ~~the practice and~~management’s current intention ~~of the Company~~ to permanently reinvest ~~the~~such undistributed earnings ofin its non-U.S. ~~subsidiaries~~subsidiaries. Due to the uncertainty caused by various methods in those operations. As of March 31, 2016, the Company has not made a provision for U.S. or additional foreign withholding taxes for financial reporting over the tax basis of investments in foreign subsidiaries that the Company considers towhich such earnings could be indefinitely reinvested, if any exists, except on those earnings that are subject to U.S. tax without regard to whether those earnings are actually distributed. Generally, such amounts become subject to U.S. taxation upon the remittance of dividends and under certain other circumstances. Itrepatriated, it is not practicable to estimate the actual amount of ~~unrecorded~~such deferred tax liabilities. The Company would consider and pursue appropriate alternatives to reduce any tax liability ~~related~~that would occur. If, in the future, undistributed earnings are repatriated to ~~investments~~the U.S., or it is determined such earnings will be repatriated in ~~these foreign subsidiaries.~~the foreseeable future, deferred tax liabilities will be recorded accordingly.

~~12.~~11. Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to certain risks arising from business operations and economic factors, including fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currencies. To manage the volatility related to exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currencies, the Company uses derivative instruments. The objective of the derivative instruments is to reduce fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency rates and interest rates. These financial instruments are not used for trading or other speculative purposes. The Company has not historically incurred, and does not expect to incur in the future, any losses as a result of counterparty default.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking cash flow hedges to specific forecasted transactions or variability of cash flow to be paid. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the designated derivative instruments that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flow of hedged items. When a derivative instrument is determined not to be highly effective as a hedge or the underlying hedged transaction is no longer probable, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively.

The following ~~table presents~~tables present the location on the consolidated balance sheets in which the Company’s derivative and nonderivative instruments have been recognized, the fair value hierarchy level applicable to each type of derivative and nonderivative instrument, and the related notional amounts and fair values as of ~~March~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2015. Derivative contracts designated as hedges are on-going; therefore no amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) have been reclassified to earnings.


(Dollars in millions)	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value Hierarchy Level	Notional Amount		Fair Value
								June 30, 2016
											Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
(In millions)								Fair Value Hierarchy Level	Notional Amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross-currency swap agreements	Other long-term liabilities	Level 2	$	730.9	$	(32.6	)	Level 2	$	730.9	Other long-term assets	$	3.9	Other long-term liabilities	$	(14.1	)
Interest rate swaps	Other current liabilities Other long-term liabilities	Level 2	216.3		(6.0		)	Level 2	199.8		Other current assets	—		Other current liabilities	(4.5		)
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Other current liabilities Other long-term liabilities	Level 2	68.3		(0.9		)	Level 2	77.7		Other current assets	—		Other current liabilities	(0.7		)
Foreign currency option contracts	Other current liabilities	Level 2	221.7		(1.7		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current liabilities	Level 2	80.8		(1.6		)
Foreign currency option and forward contracts								Level 2	307.7		Other current assets	2.7		Other current liabilities	—
Total					$	(42.8	)					$	6.6		$	(19.3	)



	December 31, 2015
				Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
(In millions)	Fair Value Hierarchy Level	Notional Amount		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross-currency swap agreements	Level 2	$	730.9	Other long-term assets	$	0.2	Other long-term liabilities	$	—
Interest rate swaps	Level 2	228.6		Other current assets	—		Other current liabilities	(7.3		)
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Interest rate swaps	Level 2	43.5		Other current assets	—		Other current liabilities	(0.7		)
Foreign currency option contracts	Level 2	235.2		Other current assets	—		Other current liabilities	(1.0		)
Total					$	0.2		$	(9.0	)

The following table indicates the amount of gains/(losses) that have been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets and gains/(losses) recognized in net ~~loss~~income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations for ~~the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 for~~ derivative and nonderivative instruments:


	Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss					Recognized in Net Loss					Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)					Recognized in Earnings
(Dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016			Three Months Ended March 31, 2015		Three Months Ended March 31, 2016			Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(In millions)											Three Months Ended June 30, 2016		Three Months Ended June 30, 2015			Three Months Ended June 30, 2016		Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross-currency swap agreements	$	(32.8	)	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	26.8	$	(31.9	)	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swaps	1.1			—		—			—		1.4		(0.7		)	—		—
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Interest rate swaps	—			—		0.2			—		—		—			0.4		—
Foreign currency option contracts	—			—		(0.8		)	—
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—		(1.6		)	—
Foreign currency option and forward contracts											—		—			5.2		—
Nonderivatives designated as hedges:
Foreign currency denominated notes	(1.7		)	—		—			—		1.0		0.6			—		—
Total	$	(33.4	)	$	—	$	(2.2	)	$	—	$	29.2	$	(32.0	)	$	5.6	$	—



	Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)						Recognized in Earnings
(In millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Six Months Ended June 30, 2015			Six Months Ended June 30, 2016		Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedges:
Cross-currency swap agreements	$	(6.0	)	$	(31.9	)	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swaps	2.5			(0.7		)	—		—
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
Interest rate swaps	—			—			0.6		—
Foreign currency option and forward contracts	—			—			2.8		—
Nonderivatives designated as hedges:
Foreign currency denominated notes	(0.7		)	0.6			—		—
Total	$	(4.2	)	$	(32.0	)	$	3.4	$	—

Hedge of Net Investments in Foreign Operations

In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes due 2022, the Company entered into certain cross-currency swap agreements to manage the related foreign currency exchange risk by effectively converting a portion of the fixed-rate USD-denominated Senior Notes due 2022, including the semi-annual interest payments, to fixed-rate, EUR-denominated debt. The risk management objective is to manage foreign currency risk relating to net investments in subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies and reduce the variability in the functional currency equivalent cash flows of a portion of the Senior Notes due 2022. During the term of the swap contracts, the Company will receive semi-annual interest payments in June and December of each year from the counterparties based on USD fixed interest rates, and the Company will make semi-annual interest payments in June and December of each year to the counterparties based on EUR fixed interest rates. At maturity, the Company will repay the original principal amount in EUR and receive the principal amount in USD. The Company has designated the cross-currency swap agreements as qualifying hedging instruments and is accounting for these as net investment hedges. The gains and losses resulting from fair value adjustments to the cross-currency swap agreements are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~income/(loss) to the extent that the cross-currency swaps are effective in hedging the designated risk. The Company did not record any ineffectiveness for the ~~three-month period~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. Cash flows related to the cross-currency swaps are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company does not expect amounts that are currently deferred in accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~income/(loss) to be reclassified to income over the next 12 months. ~~The Company did not have cross-currency swap agreements in the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.~~

In addition to the cross-currency swaps, the Company uses foreign currency denominated notes as nonderivative hedging instruments of its net investments in foreign operations. ~~During the first quarter of 2016, the~~The Company has designated ~~$37.6~~$44.4 million of its Senior Notes due 2021 included in long-term debt on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a net investment hedge of its investments in international subsidiaries that use the EUR as their functional currency. The gains and losses resulting from the exchange rate adjustments to the designated portion of the foreign currency denominated notes are recorded in accumulated other

comprehensive ~~income~~income/loss to the extent that the foreign currency denominated notes are effective in hedging the designated risk. The Company did not record any ineffectiveness for the ~~three-month period~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The Company does not expect amounts that are currently deferred in accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~income/(loss) to be reclassified to income over the next 12 months. ~~The Company did not have foreign currency denominated notes in the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.~~

Interest Rate Hedging

In order to mitigate variability in forecasted interest payments on the Company’s EUR-denominated asset financings that are based on benchmark interest rates (e.g., Euribor), the Company has entered into interest rate swaps. The objective is for the cash flows of the interest rate swaps to offset any changes in cash flows of the forecasted interest payments attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate. The interest rate swaps convert floating rate interest payments into fixed rate interest payments. The Company has designated the interest rate swaps as qualifying hedging instruments and is accounting for these as cash flow hedges of the forecasted obligations. The gains and losses resulting from fair value adjustments to the designated portion of the interest rate swaps are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~income/(loss) to the extent that the interest rate swaps are effective in

hedging the designated risk. The gains and losses will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~income/(loss) to interest expense on the dates that interest payments accrue, or when the hedged item becomes probable not to occur. The Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted interest payments through December 2017. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, a notional amount of ~~$68.3~~$77.7 million of the Company's interest rate swaps are ~~classified as derivatives~~ not designated as hedges. The gains and losses related to the interest rate swaps not designated as hedges are included in interest expense on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Cash flows related to the interest rate swaps are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company expects an inconsequential amount that is currently deferred in accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~income/(loss) to be reclassified to income during the year ended December 31, 2016. ~~The Company did not have interest rate swaps in the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.~~

Foreign Currency Option and Forward Contracts

In order to mitigate against the risk of a reduction in the value of foreign currency ~~earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA")~~ from the Company’s international operations with the EUR and GBP as the functional currency, the Company uses foreign currency option and forward contracts. The foreign currency contracts are not designated as qualifying hedging instruments as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The contracts are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and other identified risks. The contracts expire in 12 months or less. Gains or losses on the contracts are recorded in other expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Cash flows related to the foreign currency contracts are included in operating activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows. The risk of loss associated with the option contracts is limited to the premium amounts payable. ~~The Company did not have foreign currency option or forward contracts in the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.~~

~~13.~~12. Variable Interest Entities ~~and Joint Ventures~~

The Company ~~consolidates~~applies the guidance under ASC 810-10 for the determination of its Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”) and the accounting determination for consolidation. The determination to consolidate these entities is based on a 4-step analysis to first identify those entities in which the Company holds a variable interest. Upon the determination that the Company holds a variable interest ~~entities (“VIEs”)~~in the entity, the Company evaluated the criteria to determine if the entity met the definition of a VIE. These criteria include evaluating whether the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the activities of the entity, the holders of the equity interest lack decision making rights, the equity investment at risk was established with non-substantive voting rights, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack the obligation to absorb losses, and the holders of the equity investment at risk lack the right to receive residual returns. Upon the determination that an entity meets the criteria of a VIE, an evaluation is made over controlling interest and the determination of the primary beneficiary.

Based on the analysis completed, the Company determined it had variable interests in certain ~~joint ventures ("JVs")~~VIEs and consolidates these entities because it has the power to direct the activities that significantly affect the VIEs' ~~and JVs'~~ economic performance, including having operational control over each VIE and ~~JV and~~ operating the VIEs under the XPO ~~brand.~~brand or policies. The VIEs ~~and JVs~~ provide logistics services for their customers. Investors in these entities only have recourse to the assets owned by the entity and not to the Company’s general credit. The Company does not have implicit support arrangements with any VIE. Assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs ~~and JVs is~~are outlined in the table below.


(Dollars in millions)	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
(In millions)					June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14.6	$	14.3	$	16.2	$	14.3
Accounts receivable, net of allowance	60.4		54.7		63.8		54.7
Other current assets	4.8		3.8		5.3		3.8
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	3.7		4.8		3.9		4.8
Other long-term assets	5.3		3.0		2.7		3.0
Total	$	88.8	$	80.6	$	91.9	$	80.6

Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	45.4	$	44.9	$	46.2	$	44.9
Accrued expenses, other	10.8		8.1		12.4		8.1
Other current liabilities	9.4		8.9		9.5		8.9
Other long-term liabilities	10.4		5.2		9.1		5.2
Total	$	76.0	$	67.1	$	77.2	$	67.1

~~Total~~The following table summarizes total revenue ~~from~~and expenses in connection with the ~~Company’s~~Company's consolidated VIEs and JVs was $74.1 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. Related expenses for the Company’s consolidated VIEs and JVs consisted of operating expenses of $72.0 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2016, and tax expense of $0.5 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2016.VIEs. The Company did not have any VIEs ~~or JVs~~ prior to its June 2015 acquisition of ND.



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions)	2016		2015		2016		2015
Revenue	$	82.4	$	30.3	$	156.5	$	30.3
Operating expenses	$	79.1	$	29.5	$	151.1	$	29.5

~~14.~~13. Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per ~~common~~ share are computed ~~by dividing net income attributable to~~using the two-class method, which is an earnings allocation method that determines earnings (loss) per share for common ~~shareholders by~~shares and participating securities. The participating securities consist of the ~~weighted-average number of~~Company's Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock. The undistributed earnings are allocated between common shares ~~of common stock outstanding~~and participating securities as if all earnings had been distributed during the period. ~~Diluted earnings per common share~~In periods of loss, no allocation is made to the preferred shares. The dividend rights are ~~computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by~~defined in the ~~combined weighted-average number~~Certification of ~~shares~~Designation of ~~common stock outstanding and the potential dilution of stock options, warrants, RSUs, PRSUs, Convertible Notes and the Company’s~~

Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock ~~par value $0.001 per share, outstanding during~~of XPO Logistics, Inc. filed with the ~~period, if dilutive. The weighted-average of potentially dilutive securities excluded from~~Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on Form 8-K on September 6, 2011.



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions, except per share data)	2016			2015			2016			2015
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
Net income (loss) attributable to XPO	$	46.6		$	(74.4	)	$	24.1		$	(88.8	)
Cumulative preferred dividends	(0.7		)	(0.7		)	(1.5		)	(1.5		)
Non-cash allocation of undistributed earnings	(3.3		)	—			(0.6		)	—
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares, basic	$	42.6		$	(75.1	)	$	22.0		$	(90.3	)

Basic weighted-average common shares	110.0			84.3			109.8			81.6
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.39		$	(0.89	)	$	0.20		$	(1.11	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares, basic	$	42.6		$	(75.1	)	$	22.0		$	(90.3	)
Interest from Convertible Senior Notes	0.3			—			—			—
Net income (loss) allocable to common shares, diluted	$	42.9		$	(75.1	)	$	22.0		$	(90.3	)

Basic weighted-average common shares	110.0			84.3			109.8			81.6
Dilutive effect of non-participating stock-based awards and Convertible Senior Notes	12.3			—			9.1			—
Diluted weighted-average common shares	122.3			84.3			118.9			81.6

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.35		$	(0.89	)	$	0.19		$	(1.11	)

Dilutive potential common shares excluded	11.1			25.6			14.9			25.8

Certain shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share ~~is shown~~because the effect was either anti-dilutive or in the ~~table below.~~

Three Months Ended March 31,
2016 2015
Basic weighted average common stock outstanding 109,628,094
78,825,639
Potentially dilutive securities:
Shares underlying the conversion of preferred stock to common stock 10,412,145
10,476,430
Shares underlying the conversion of the convertible senior notes 3,180,806
5,171,353
Shares underlying warrants to purchase common stock 7,557,370
8,776,365
Shares underlying stock options to purchase common stock 570,684
633,392
Shares underlying restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units 1,607,032
1,025,632

23,328,037
26,083,172
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 132,956,131
104,908,811

~~The impact~~case of ~~this dilution~~unvested PRSU awards, the performance condition was not ~~reflected in the earnings per share calculations in the consolidated statements~~met as of operations because the impact was anti-dilutive. The treasury stock method was used to determine the shares underlying warrants, stock options, RSUs and PRSUs for potential dilution with an average market price of $25.21 per share and $41.90 per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.June 30, 2016.

~~15.~~14. Segment Reporting

The Company ~~determines its operating segments based on~~is organized into two reportable segments: Transportation and Logistics. Corporate and Eliminations are the ~~information utilized by~~remaining portions to reconcile to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Transportation segment provides freight brokerage, last mile, expedite, intermodal, LTL, full truckload, managed transportation and global forwarding services. The Logistics segment provides a range of contract logistics services, including highly engineered and customized solutions, value-added warehousing and distribution and other inventory solutions.

Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), regularly reviews financial information at the ~~Company’s Chief Executive Officer,~~reporting segment level in order to ~~allocate~~make decisions about resources ~~and assess performance. Based on this information,~~to be allocated to the ~~Company has determined that it has two operating~~ segments and ~~two reportable segments. The Company’s operating and reportable segments~~to assess their performance. Segment results that are ~~Transportation and Logistics.~~

~~These reportable segments are strategic business units through which~~reported to the ~~Company offers different services. The Company~~

~~evaluates the performance of the segments primarily based on their respective net operating margins,~~CODM include items directly attributable to a segment as well as ~~revenues, net revenue margin and operating income. Accordingly, interest expense and other non-operating items~~those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis. Asset information by segment is not provided to our CODM as the majority of our assets are ~~not reported in segment results. In addition,~~managed at the ~~Company has disclosed~~ corporate amounts, which are not related to an operating segment and includes the costs of the Company’s executive and shared service teams, professional services such as legal and consulting, board of directors, and certain other corporate costs associated with operating as a public company. The Company allocates charges to the reportable segments for technology services and depreciation of technology fixed assets, as well as centralized recruiting and training resources. level.

Intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated balance sheets and results of operations. Intra-segment transactions have been eliminated in the reportable segment results of operations, whereas inter-segment transactions represent a reconciling item to consolidated results as shown below.

~~The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.~~

The Company evaluates performance based on various financial measures of the respective business segments. The ~~chief operating decision maker does not review assets by segment for purposes of allocating resources and therefore assets by segment are not disclosed.~~

~~The~~ following schedule identifies selected financial data for the ~~three-month~~three- and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

(Dollars in millions) Transportation Logistics Corporate Eliminations Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Revenue $ 2,297.4
$ 1,260.7
$ —
$ (12.4 ) $ 3,545.7
Operating income (loss) 75.4
31.9
(44.9 ) —
62.4
Depreciation and amortization 114.6
47.1
0.4
—
162.1
Interest expense —
—
93.1
—
93.1
Income tax benefit —
—
(15.7 ) —
(15.7 )
Goodwill 2,629.6
2,157.4
—
—
4,787.0

Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
Revenue $ 562.2
$ 140.8
$ —
$ —
$ 703.0
Operating income (loss) 3.6
6.4
(14.8 ) —
(4.8 )
Depreciation and amortization 19.7
13.7
0.4
—
33.8
Interest expense —
—
23.1
—
23.1
Income tax benefit —
—
(13.6 ) —
(13.6 )
Goodwill 614.7
353.1
—
—
967.8



(In millions)	Transportation		Logistics		Corporate			Eliminations			Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
Revenue	$	2,418.9	$	1,332.0	$	—		$	(67.6	)	$	3,683.3
Operating income (loss)	153.2		51.1		(34.0		)	—			170.3
Depreciation and amortization	112.5		48.6		0.4			—			161.5

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Revenue	$	861.2	359.6		$	—		$	(4.9	)	$	1,215.9
Operating income (loss)	23.0		4.3		(57.4		)	—			(30.1		)
Depreciation and amortization	29.1		26.6		0.4			—			56.1

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Revenue	$	4,716.3	$	2,592.7	$	—		$	(80.0	)	$	7,229.0
Operating income (loss)	228.6		83.0		(78.9		)	—			232.7
Depreciation and amortization	227.1		95.7		0.8			—			323.6

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Revenue	$	1,423.5	$	500.4	$	—		$	(5.0	)	$	1,918.9
Operating income (loss)	26.7		10.7		(72.0		)	—			(34.6		)
Depreciation and amortization	48.8		40.3		0.8			—			89.9

~~16. Related Party Transactions~~

For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company leased office space from three entities partially owned and controlled by Louis DeJoy, the former chief executive officer of the Company's North American supply chain business, who was elected as a member of the Company's Board of Directors on December 3, 2015. The non-cancellable lease agreements for these entities expire at various dates in 2019. Each lease agreement provides the Company, as tenant, with two five-year option periods to extend the lease term. The Company made rent payments associated with these lease agreements in the amounts of $0.5 million and $0.5 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, the Company paid operating expenses in connection with these leased properties of $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

For the three-months period ended March 31, 2016, the Company provided certain air charter schedule recovery services to Ameriflight, LLC ("Ameriflight"), a regional air cargo carrier. James J. Martell, a member of the Company's Board of Directors, owns and serves as the executive chairman of Ameriflight. The Company provides its services to Ameriflight on a transactional basis without a written contract. The Company received payments from Ameriflight or its affiliates in an amount of approximately $0.3 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016. The Company did not receive payments from Ameriflight or its affiliates in the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other written reports and oral statements we make from time to time contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "continue," "could," "intend," "may," "plan," "potential," "predict," "should," "will," "expect," "objective," "projection," "forecast," "goal," "guidance," "outlook," "effort," "target" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terms. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to a material difference include those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, the risks discussed in our other filings with the SEC and the following: economic conditions generally; competition and pricing pressures; our ability to align our investments in capital assets, including equipment, service centers and warehouses, to our customers’ demands; our ability to successfully manage our growth, including by maintaining effective internal controls; our ability to successfully integrate and realize anticipated synergies, cost savings and profit improvement opportunities with respect to acquired companies; our ability to retain our and our acquired businesses’ largest customers; our ability to develop and implement suitable information technology systems; our substantial indebtedness; our ability to raise debt and equity capital; our ability to attract and retain key employees to execute our strategy, including retention of acquired companies’ key employees; our ability to maintain positive relationships with our network of third-party transportation providers; our ability to attract and retain qualified drivers; litigation, including litigation related to alleged misclassification of independent contractors; labor matters; risks associated with our self-insured claims; risks associated with defined benefit plans for our current and former employees; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; fluctuations in fixed and floating interest rates; our ability to execute our growth strategy through acquisitions; fuel price and fuel surcharge changes; weather and other service disruptions; governmental regulation; and governmental ~~regulation.~~or political actions,including the United Kingdom's likely exit from the European Union. All forward-looking statements set forth in this Quarterly Report are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences

to or effects on us or our business or operations. Forward-looking statements set forth in this Quarterly Report speak only as of the date hereof, and we do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, changes in expectations or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except to the extent required by law.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. In addition, reference should be made to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and related "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Executive Summary

XPO Logistics is a top ten global provider of cutting-edge supply chain ~~solutions.~~solutions to the most successful companies in the world. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, ~~our~~the Company operates as one highly integrated network of people, technology and physical assets in 34 countries, with over ~~87,000~~88,000 employees and 1,440 ~~locations operated in 33 countries, and included leading positions in many fast-growing areas of transportation and logistics, representing diverse industry sectors and geographies.~~

~~Our service capabilities, capacity and technology enable customers of all sizes~~locations. XPO uses its network to ~~operate their supply chains more efficiently and at lower cost. Among the~~help more than 50,000 customers ~~we served as of March 31, 2016 are many of the world’s largest multinational companies, and these companies depend on us to~~ manage their ~~transportation and logistics needs.~~goods more efficiently throughout their supply chains.

We run our business on a global basis, with two segments: Transportation and Logistics. Within each segment, we have built robust service offerings that respond to fast-growing areas of customer demand. Substantially all of our businesses operate under the single brand of XPO Logistics.

In our Transportation segment, we hold industry-leading positions in both North America and Europe. Globally, we are the second largest freight brokerage provider. In North America, we are the largest provider of last mile logistics for heavy goods and the largest manager of expedite shipments; the second largest provider of less-than-truckload transportation; and the third largest provider of intermodal services, with business in full truckload, global forwarding and managed transportation.

Our Transportation segment uses a blended model of owned, contracted and brokered capacity that gives us the flexibility to offer solutions that best serve the interests of our customers and the Company. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, globally, we had more than

10,000 independent owner operators under contract to provide drayage, expedite, last mile and less-than-truckload services to our customers, and more than 50,000 independent brokered carriers representing approximately 1,000,000 trucks on the road.

The Company employs professional drivers who transport goods for customers using our owned and leased trucks and trailers: a global fleet of approximately 19,000 tractors and 47,000 trailers primarily related to our less-than-truckload and full truckload businesses. These assets also provide capacity for our truck brokerage operations.

In our Logistics segment, we provide a range of contract logistics services, including highly engineered and customized solutions, value-added warehousing and distribution, cold chain solutions and other inventory solutions. We perform e-commerce fulfillment, warehousing, reverse logistics, storage, factory support, aftermarket support, manufacturing, distribution and packaging and labeling, as well as optimization services, such as supply chain consulting and production flow management.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we operated approximately 151 million square feet (14.0 million square meters) of contract logistics facility space globally, with about 65.0 million square feet (6.1 million square meters) of that capacity in the United States, making us the second largest contract logistics provider globally.

In ~~a little more~~less than ~~four~~five years, we have taken XPO from a North American business with $177 million of revenue to a top ten global transportation and logistics company. In September 2011, following the equity investment in the Company led by Bradley S. Jacobs, we put a highly skilled management team in place and began the disciplined execution of a growth strategy to acquire and integrate attractive companies and optimize all XPO operations, with the goal of creating dramatic, long-term value for our customers and shareholders.

We offer customers a compelling range of transportation and logistics solutions:

Freight Brokerage: the second largest freight brokerage firm worldwide; the third largest provider of door-to-door intermodal rail services in North America, with one of the largest U.S. drayage networks, and a leader in cross-border Mexico intermodal;

Last Mile: the largest provider of home delivery and installation logistics for heavy goods in North America, and a leading last mile provider to the e-commerce industry;

Supply Chain: the second largest global provider of contract logistics based on square footage, with one of the largest e-fulfillment platforms in Europe;

Expedite: the largest manager of time-critical and high-value expedite shipments in North America via ground transportation, air charter and web-based managed transportation services;

Less-Than-Truckload: the second largest provider of LTL services in North America and a leading provider of LTL

services in Western Europe. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company’s LTL service in North America had some of the highest service levels in the industry for on-time performance, offered more next-day and two-day lanes than any other LTL carrier, and covered 99% of U.S. postal codes;

Full Truckload: a top 20 U.S. carrier and a leading cross-border Mexico ground transportation provider;

Managed Transportation: a top five global service provider based on the value of XPO’s freight under management, which was approximately $2.7 billion as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016; and

Global Forwarding: a growing provider of global forwarding services.

We believe that our ability to provide customers with integrated, end-to-end supply chain solutions gives us a competitive advantage. Many customers, particularly large companies, are increasingly turning to multi-modal providers to handle their supply chain requirements. We have built XPO to capitalize on this trend, as well as the trend toward outsourcing in both transportation and logistics, the boom in e-commerce, the adoption of just-in-time inventory practices, and the near-shoring in Mexico.

Our customers are served by well-trained employees who understand the importance of world-class service, and who use our leading-edge, proprietary technology to perform their jobs. We have a global team of approximately 1,500 IT professionals who understand how to drive innovation for the benefit of our customers. Our annual investment in technology is among the highest in our industry, because we see the ongoing development of our proprietary technology as being critical to our ability to continually improve customer service and leverage our scale.

Strategy for Growth

XPO Logistics is a top ten global transportation and logistics company, providing cutting-edge supply chain solutions to many of the most ~~successful~~prominent companies in the world. ~~We’ve~~We have established leading positions in key areas of transportation and logistics where there is strong secular demand. We offer our solutions through our highly integrated, multi-modal organization that operates

under the single XPO Logistics brand. Our strategy is to optimize our global franchise, execute on opportunities to increase our profitability, and create dramatic long-term value for our customers and shareholders.

We intend to continue to grow the business in a disciplined manner, and with a compelling value proposition: integrated solutions for any company, of any size, with any combination of supply chain needs.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

Consolidated Summary Financial Table

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Percent of Revenue				Change		Three Months Ended June 30,						Percent of Revenue				Change		Six Months Ended June 30,						Percent of Revenue				Change
(Dollars in millions)	2016			2015			2016		2015		%
(In millions)													2016			2015			2016		2015		%		2016			2015			2016		2015		%
Revenue	$	3,545.7		$	703.0		100.0	%	100.0	%	404.4	%	$	3,683.3		$	1,215.9		100.0	%	100.0	%	202.9	%	$	7,229.0		$	1,918.9		100.0	%	100.0	%	276.7	%
Cost of transportation and services	1,945.1			440.8			54.9	%	62.7	%	341.3	%	1,973.3			707.3			53.6	%	58.2	%	179.0	%	3,918.4			1,148.0			54.2	%	59.8	%	241.3	%
Net revenue	1,600.6			262.2			45.1	%	37.3	%	510.5	%	1,710.0			508.6			46.4	%	41.8	%	236.2	%	3,310.6			770.9			45.8	%	40.2	%	329.4	%
Direct operating expense	1,106.2			151.2			31.2	%	21.5	%	631.6	%	1,130.2			318.3			30.7	%	26.2	%	255.1	%	2,236.4			469.5			30.9	%	24.5	%	376.3	%
SG&A expense
Salaries & benefits	232.8			60.9			6.6	%	8.7	%	282.3	%	206.1			108.8			5.6	%	8.9	%	89.4	%	438.9			169.6			6.1	%	8.8	%	158.8	%
Other SG&A expense	58.9			18.6			1.7	%	2.6	%	216.7	%	64.7			31.3			1.8	%	2.6	%	106.7	%	123.6			49.5			1.7	%	2.6	%	149.7	%
Purchased services	80.0			10.8			2.3	%	1.5	%	640.7	%	74.3			42.5			2.0	%	3.5	%	74.8	%	154.3			53.6			2.1	%	2.8	%	187.9	%
Depreciation & amortization	60.3			25.5			1.7	%	3.6	%	136.5	%	64.4			37.8			1.7	%	3.1	%	70.4	%	124.7			63.3			1.7	%	3.3	%	97.0	%
Total SG&A expense	432.0			115.8			12.3	%	16.4	%	273.1	%	409.5			220.4			11.1	%	18.1	%	85.8	%	841.5			336.0			11.6	%	17.5	%	150.4	%
Operating income (loss)	62.4			(4.8		)	1.6	%	(0.6	)%	(1,400.0	)%	170.3			(30.1		)	4.6	%	(2.5	)%	665.8	%	232.7			(34.6		)	3.3	%	(1.8	)%	772.5	%
Other expense	1.2			0.2			—		—		500.0	%
Other (income) expense													(7.9		)	2.1			(0.2	)%	0.2	%	(476.2	)%	(6.7		)	2.4			(0.1	)%	0.1	%	(379.2	)%
Foreign currency loss	3.1			0.2			0.1	%	—		1,450.0	%	0.1			19.8			—	%	1.6	%	(99.5	)%	3.2			20.0			—	%	1.0	%	(84.0	)%
Interest expense	93.1			23.1			2.6	%	3.3	%	303.0	%	94.7			36.3			2.6	%	3.0	%	160.9	%	187.8			59.4			2.6	%	3.1	%	216.2	%
Loss before income tax benefit	(35.0		)	(28.3		)	(1.1	)%	(3.9	)%	23.7	%
Income tax benefit	(15.7		)	(13.6		)	(0.4	)%	(1.9	)%	15.4	%
Net loss	$	(19.3	)	$	(14.7	)	(0.7	)%	(2.0	)%	31.3	%
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)													83.4			(88.3		)	2.2	%	(5.7	)%	(194.5	)%	48.4			(116.4		)	0.8	%	(6.0	)%	(141.6	)%
Income tax provision (benefit)													33.0			(9.5		)	0.9	%	(0.8	)%	(447.4	)%	17.3			(23.2		)	0.2	%	(1.2	)%	(174.6	)%
Net income (loss)													$	50.4		$	(78.8	)	1.3	%	(4.9	)%	(164.0	)%	$	31.1		$	(93.2	)	0.6	%	(4.8	)%	(133.4	)%

Consolidated Results

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015

Our consolidated revenue for the ~~first three months~~second quarter of 2016 increased ~~404.4%~~202.9% to ~~$3,545.7~~$3,683.3 million from ~~$703.0~~$1,215.9 million in the ~~first three months~~second quarter of 2015. The increase was primarily driven by the 2015 acquisitions of ND ~~Con-way~~ and ~~BTT, as well as organic growth. ND and Con-way's revenue included~~Con-way. Included in the ~~Company's~~comparative period is a partial month of results ~~in the first three months of 2016 was $1,469.1 million and $1,280.3 million, respectively.~~from ND.

Net revenue ~~for the first three months~~as a percentage of ~~2016~~revenue, or net revenue margin, increased ~~510.5% to $1,600.6 million~~4.6 percentage points from ~~$262.2 million~~41.8% in the ~~first three months~~second quarter of ~~2015. Net revenue margin was 45.1%~~2015 to 46.4% in the ~~first three months~~second quarter of ~~2016 as compared to 37.3% in the first three months of 2015. The increase in net revenue is attributable to acquisitions and organic growth.~~2016. The increase in net revenue margin ~~primarily relates~~is attributable to the change in the mix of revenue generating activities resulting from the acquisitions of Con-way and ND, ~~and Con-way as well as organic improvement to~~offset by lower net revenue ~~margin at our truck brokerage~~margins in the intermodal and ~~last mile~~expedite businesses.

Direct operating expense for the ~~first three months~~second quarter of 2016 was ~~$1,106.2~~$1,130.2 million, or ~~31.2%~~30.7% as a percentage of revenue, compared to ~~$151.2~~$318.3 million, or ~~21.5%~~26.2% as a percentage of revenue, in the ~~first three months~~second quarter of 2015. Direct operating expense ~~increased~~and the related percentage of revenue increase is primarily due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.

Sales, general and administrative expense (“SG&A”) expense increased to $409.5 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $220.4 million in the second quarter of 2015 primarily due to the contribution of SG&A associated with new acquisitions. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 11.1% in the second quarter of 2016 as compared to 18.1% in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease is attributable to a change in mix from acquisitions and the cost saving measures being implemented as part of the integration of acquired businesses.

Foreign currency loss for the second quarter of 2016 decreased to $0.1 million from $19.8 million in the second quarter of 2015. The loss in the second quarter of 2015 was primarily due to foreign currency transaction and remeasurement losses on the cash held to purchase ND and the impact of other foreign currency transactions.

Interest expense increased to $94.7 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $36.3 million in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in interest expense for the second quarter of 2016 was primarily attributable to the increased indebtedness through which the Company funded the 2015 acquisitions.

Our effective income tax rates in the second quarter of 2016 and 2015 were 39.6% and 10.8%, respectively. The rate in the second quarter of 2016 is driven by ~~$316.2~~our forecasted income tax rate and impacted by specific discrete items. Overall discrete items were relatively immaterial on a combined basis with the effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2016 approximating the expected effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016. The effective income tax rate for the second quarter of 2015 reflects the adjustment of valuation allowances on the Company's net federal, state and foreign deferred tax assets, the non-taxable nature of certain foreign currency translations, and the geographic mix of income among the jurisdictions in which the Company does business with statutory tax rates that differ from the U.S. rate.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Our consolidated revenue for the first six months of 2016 increased 276.7% to $7,229.0 million from $1,918.9 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase was driven by the acquisitions of ND and Con-way. Included in the comparative period is a partial month of results from ND.

Net revenue margin was 45.8% in the first six months of 2016 as compared to 40.2% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in net revenue margin is attributable to the change in mix of revenue generating activities resulting from the acquisitions of Con-way and ND, offset by lower margins in certain Transportation businesses including intermodal and expedite.

Direct operating expense for the first six months of 2016 was $2,236.4 million, or 30.9% as a percentage of revenue, compared to $469.5 million, or 24.5% as a percentage of revenue, in the first six months of 2015. Direct operating expense and the related percentage of revenue increased due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.

SG&A expense increased to $841.5 million in the first six months of 2016 from $336.0 million in the first six months of 2015 primarily due to the contribution of SG&A associated with new ~~acquisitions and transaction and integration costs.~~acquisitions. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to ~~12.3%~~11.6% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 as compared to ~~16.4%~~17.5% in the first ~~three months of 2015.~~

Operating income was $62.4 million in the first three months of 2016, and includes a $5.8 million benefit to depreciation and amortization related to updated purchase price allocation of acquired assets. Operating loss in the first three months of 2015 was $4.8 million. The increase was primarily due to the increase in net revenue and lower SG&A as a percentage of revenue.

~~Other expense for the first three months of 2016 increased to $1.2 million from $0.2 million in the first three~~six months of 2015. The ~~increase was primarily driven by $2.4 million~~decrease is attributable to a change in ~~losses recognized in earnings in~~mix from acquisitions and the ~~first three months~~cost savings measures being implemented as part of ~~2016 for foreign~~

~~currency option and forward contracts not designated as qualifying hedging instruments, partially offset by a $2.0 million gain on sale~~the integration of ~~assets.~~the acquired businesses.

Foreign currency loss for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$3.1~~$3.2 million from ~~$0.2~~$20.0 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The ~~increase~~loss in the second quarter of 2015 was primarily due to foreign currency transaction and remeasurement losses on the cash held to purchase ND and the impact of other foreign currency ~~transactions related to the acquisition of ND.~~transactions.

Interest expense ~~for the first three months of 2016~~ increased ~~303.0%~~ to ~~$93.1 million from $23.1~~$187.8 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 from $59.4 million in the first six months of 2015. The increase in interest expense for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 was primarily attributable to the increased indebtedness through which the Company funded the 2015 acquisitions.

Our effective income tax rates in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 and 2015 were ~~44.9%~~35.7% and ~~48.1%~~19.9%, respectively. The rate in the first six months of 2016 is driven by our forecasted income tax rate and adjusted for specific discrete items recognized during the year. Our forecasted effective income tax rate is expected to approximate 39% for the year ended December 31, 2016. The effective income tax rate for the ~~first three~~six months ended June 30, 2015 reflects the non-deductible nature of ~~2016 reflects additional valuation allowances established~~certain expenses, including those related to acquisitions, the non-taxable nature of the last mile logistics platform, a change in estimate of realization on ~~state and foreign net operating losses where it is more likely than not the deferred~~prior tax ~~assets will not be utilized, non-deductible transaction costs~~positions, and the geographic mix of income among the jurisdictions in which we do business with statutory tax rates that differ from the U.S. rate. The tax rate for the first three months of 2015 reflects the non-deductible nature of certain expenses (including those related to the Company’s acquisitions), the non-taxable nature of a holdback liability release related to the initial acquisition of the Company's last mile logistics platform and the mix of income among the jurisdictions in which we do business with statutory rates that differ from the U.S. rate. For both periods, our effective income tax rates reflect the Company’s intention and ability to permanently reinvest earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Consequently the Company has not provided any additional U.S. taxes on the undistributed earnings as of the balance sheet dates, except on those earnings that are subject to U.S. tax without regard to whether those earnings are actually distributed.

~~The increase in net loss was due primarily to higher interest expense and increased intangible asset amortization related to acquisitions.~~

Transportation

Summary Financial Table

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Percent of Revenue				Change		Three Months Ended June 30,				Percent of Revenue				Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				Percent of Revenue				Change
(Dollars in millions)	2016		2015		2016		2015		%
(In millions)											2016		2015		2016		2015		%		2016		2015		2016		2015		%
Revenue	$	2,297.4	$	562.2	100.0	%	100.0	%	308.6	%	$	2,418.9	$	861.2	100.0	%	100.0	%	180.9	%	$	4,716.3	$	1,423.5	100.0	%	100.0	%	231.3	%
Cost of transportation and services	1,647.1		440.8		71.7	%	78.4	%	273.7	%	1,715.9		667.4		70.9	%	77.5	%	157.1	%	3,363.0		1,108.2		71.3	%	77.9	%	203.5	%
Net revenue	650.3		121.4		28.3	%	21.6	%	435.7	%	703.0		193.8		29.1	%	22.5	%	262.7	%	1,353.3		315.3		28.7	%	22.1	%	329.2	%
Direct operating expense	312.4		30.2		13.6	%	5.4	%	934.4	%	297.8		57.9		12.3	%	6.7	%	414.3	%	610.2		88.2		12.9	%	6.2	%	591.8	%
SG&A expense
Salaries & benefits	147.3		48.3		6.4	%	8.6	%	205.0	%	142.7		66.5		5.9	%	7.7	%	114.6	%	290.0		114.9		6.1	%	8.1	%	152.4	%
Other SG&A expense	37.0		14.5		1.6	%	2.6	%	155.2	%	30.6		16.3		1.3	%	1.9	%	87.7	%	67.6		30.5		1.4	%	2.1	%	121.6	%
Purchased services	39.9		5.7		1.7	%	1.0	%	600.0	%	37.1		7.5		1.5	%	0.9	%	394.7	%	77.0		13.3		1.6	%	0.9	%	478.9	%
Depreciation & amortization	38.3		19.1		1.7	%	3.4	%	100.5	%	41.6		22.6		1.7	%	2.6	%	84.1	%	79.9		41.7		1.7	%	2.9	%	91.6	%
Total SG&A expense	262.5		87.6		11.4	%	15.6	%	199.7	%	252.0		112.9		10.4	%	13.1	%	123.2	%	514.5		200.4		10.8	%	14.0	%	156.7	%
Operating income	$	75.4	$	3.6	3.3	%	0.6	%	1,994.4	%	$	153.2	$	23.0	6.4	%	2.7	%	566.1	%	$	228.6	$	26.7	5.0	%	1.9	%	756.2	%

Note: Total depreciation and amortization for the Transportation reportable segment included in the cost of transportation and services, direct operating expense and SG&A was ~~$114.6~~$112.5 million and ~~$19.7~~$29.1 million for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $227.1 million and $48.8 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Transportation

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015

Revenue in our Transportation segment increased by ~~308.6%~~180.9% to ~~$2,297.4~~$2,418.9 million in the second quarter of 2016 compared to $861.2 million in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in revenue was primarily due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way as well as growth at our last mile and truck brokerage businesses. The increased revenue in the last mile business was driven by an increase in customer stops. The increased revenue in the truck brokerage business was due to increased load volumes.

Net revenue margin was 29.1% in the second quarter of 2016 as compared to 22.5% in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in net revenue margin is attributable to the change in the mix of revenue generating activities resulting from the acquisitions of ND and Con-way, offset by lower net revenue margins in the intermodal and expedite businesses.

Direct operating expense for the second quarter of 2016 was $297.8 million, or 12.3% as a percentage of revenue, compared to $57.9 million, or 6.7% as a percentage of revenue, in the second quarter of 2015. Direct operating expense and the related percentage of revenue increased due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.

SG&A expense increased to $252.0 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $112.9 million in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to SG&A associated with new acquisitions. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense decreased to 10.4% in the second quarter of 2016 compared with 13.1% in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease is attributable to a change in mix from acquisitions and the cost savings measures being implemented as part of the integration of the acquired businesses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Revenue in our Transportation segment increased by 231.3% to $4,716.3 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 compared to ~~$562.2~~$1,423.5 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in revenue was primarily due to the acquisitions of ND ~~Con-way~~ and ~~BTT~~Con-way as well as ~~organic~~ growth atin our last mile and ~~truck~~freight brokerage businesses.

~~Net~~ The increased revenue ~~increased 435.7% to $650.3 million~~ in the ~~first three months of 2016 from $121.4 million~~last mile business was driven by an increase in customer stops. The increased revenue in the ~~first three months of 2015.~~ freight brokerage business was due to increased load volumes offset by a decrease in revenue per load.

Net revenue margin was ~~28.3%~~28.7% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 as compared to ~~21.6%~~22.1% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in net revenue margin is attributable to ~~acquisitions and organic growth. The increase~~the change in ~~net~~mix of revenue ~~margin was primarily due to~~generating activities resulting from the acquisition of ~~the~~ND and Con-way, ~~less-than-truckload business and improvement in net revenue margin at last mile and truck brokerage, partially~~ offset by lower margins at the intermodal and expedite ~~margins.~~

businesses.

Direct operating expense for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 was ~~$312.4~~$610.2 million, or ~~13.6%~~12.9% as a percentage of revenue, compared to ~~$30.2~~$88.2 million, or ~~5.4%~~6.2% as a percentage of revenue, in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. Direct operating expense and the related percentage of revenue increased due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.

SG&A expense increased to ~~$262.5~~$514.5 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 from ~~$87.6~~$200.4 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to SG&A associated with new ~~acquisitions and transaction and integration costs.~~acquisitions. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense decreased to ~~11.4%~~10.8% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 compared with ~~15.6%~~14.0% in the first ~~three months of 2015.~~

~~Operating income was $75.4 million in the first three months of 2016 compared to $3.6 million in the first three~~six months of 2015. The ~~increase~~decrease is attributable to a change in ~~operating income was primarily due to~~mix from acquisitions and the ~~increase in net revenue and lower SG&A expense~~cost savings measures being implemented as ~~a percentage~~part of ~~revenue.~~the integration of the acquired businesses.

Management’s growth strategy for the Transportation segment is to:

Market our broader, integrated multi-modal offering to customers of all sizes, both new business and existing accounts;

Cross-sell transportation solutions to customers of our Logistics segment;

Optimize all operations to provide world-class service and highly effective solutions that satisfy customers’ transportation-related supply chain goals;

Recruit and retain quality drivers, and best utilize our transportation assets;

Attract and retain quality independent owner operators and independent brokered carriers for our carrier network;

Recruit and retain quality sales and service representatives and improve employee productivity with state-of-the-art training and information technology;

Integrate industry best practices with a focus on utilizing the advantages of our scale and lowering administrative overhead; and

Continue to develop cutting-edge capabilities for our information technology platform.

Logistics

Summary Financial Table

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Percent of Revenue				Change		Three Months Ended June 30,				Percent of Revenue				Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				Percent of Revenue				Change
(Dollars in millions)	2016		2015		2016		2015		%
(In millions)											2016		2015		2016		2015		%		2016		2015		2016		2015		%
Revenue	$	1,260.7	$	140.8	100.0	%	100.0	%	795.4	%	$	1,332.0	$	359.6	100.0	%	100.0	%	270.4	%	$	2,592.7	$	500.4	100.0	%	100.0	%	418.1	%
Cost of transportation and services	310.2		—		24.6	%	—		100.0	%	323.2		45.6		24.3	%	12.7	%	608.8	%	633.4		45.6		24.4	%	9.1	%	1,289.0	%
Net revenue	950.5		140.8		75.4	%	100.0	%	575.1	%	1,008.8		314.0		75.7	%	87.3	%	221.3	%	1,959.3		454.8		75.6	%	90.9	%	330.8	%
Direct operating expense	793.8		121.0		63.0	%	85.9	%	556.0	%	832.8		260.3		62.5	%	72.4	%	219.9	%	1,626.6		381.3		62.7	%	76.2	%	326.6	%
SG&A expense
Salaries & benefits	69.2		5.1		5.5	%	3.6	%	1,256.9	%	54.6		24.9		4.1	%	6.9	%	119.3	%	123.8		30.0		4.8	%	6.0	%	312.7	%
Other SG&A expense	12.2		1.7		1.0	%	1.2	%	617.6	%	24.5		6.2		1.8	%	1.7	%	295.2	%	36.7		7.9		1.4	%	1.6	%	364.6	%
Purchased services	21.7		0.6		1.7	%	0.4	%	3,516.7	%	23.5		3.5		1.8	%	1.0	%	571.4	%	45.2		4.1		1.7	%	0.8	%	1,002.4	%
Depreciation & amortization	21.7		6.0		1.7	%	4.3	%	261.7	%	22.3		14.8		1.7	%	4.1	%	50.7	%	44.0		20.8		1.7	%	4.2	%	111.5	%
Total SG&A expense	124.8		13.4		9.9	%	9.5	%	831.3	%	124.9		49.4		9.4	%	13.7	%	152.8	%	249.7		62.8		9.6	%	12.6	%	297.6	%
Operating income	$	31.9	$	6.4	2.5	%	4.6	%	398.4	%	$	51.1	$	4.3	3.8	%	1.2	%	1,088.4	%	$	83.0	$	10.7	3.3	%	2.1	%	675.7	%

Note: Total depreciation and amortization for the Logistics reportable segment included in the cost of transportation and services, direct operating expense and SG&A was ~~$47.1~~$48.6 million and ~~$13.7~~$26.6 million for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $95.7 million and $40.3 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Logistics

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015

Revenue in our Logistics segment increased by ~~795.4%~~270.4% to ~~$1,260.7~~$1,332.0 million in the second quarter of 2016 compared to $359.6 million in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by the acquisitions of ND and Con-way as well as growth from new customer contracts partially offset by certain voluntary and involuntary customer losses and lower volumes with certain customers.

Net revenue increased 221.3% to $1,008.8 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $314.0 million in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in net revenue was primarily attributable to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way. Net revenue margin was 75.7% in the second quarter of 2016 compared to 87.3% in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease in net revenue margin was primarily due to lower margins on contracts acquired as part of the ND and Con-way acquisitions.

Direct operating expense in the second quarter of 2016 was $832.8 million, or 62.5% as a percentage of revenue, compared to $260.3 million, or 72.4% as a percentage of revenue, in the second quarter of 2015. Direct operating expense increased due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.

SG&A expense increased to $124.9 million in the second quarter of 2016 from $49.4 million in the second quarter of 2015. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to SG&A expense associated with new acquisitions. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense decreased to 9.4% in the second quarter of 2016 compared to 13.7% in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease is attributable to a change in mix from acquisitions and the cost savings measures being implemented as part of the integration of the acquired businesses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Revenue in our Logistics segment increased by 418.1% to $2,592.7 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 compared to ~~$140.8~~$500.4 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by the acquisitions of ND and Con-way as well as ~~organic growth.~~growth from new customer contracts partially offset by certain customer losses and lower volumes across the portfolio of key customers.

Net revenue increased ~~575.1%~~330.8% to ~~$950.5~~$1,959.3 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 from ~~$140.8~~$454.8 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in net revenue was primarily attributable to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way. Net revenue margin was 75.6% in the second quarter of 2016 compared to 90.9% in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease in net revenue margin was primarily due to lower margins on contracts acquired as part of the ND and Con-way ~~as well as organic growth.~~

acquisitions.

Direct operating expense in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 was ~~$793.8~~$1,626.6 million, or ~~63.0%~~62.7% as a percentage of revenue, compared to ~~$121.0~~$381.3 million, or ~~85.9%~~76.2% as a percentage of revenue, in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. Direct operating expense increased due to the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.

SG&A expense increased to ~~$124.8~~$249.7 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 from ~~$13.4~~$62.8 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. The increase in SG&A expense was primarily due to SG&A expense associated with new ~~acquisitions and transaction and integration costs.~~acquisitions. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense ~~increased~~decreased to ~~9.9%~~9.6% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 compared to ~~9.5%~~12.6% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015.

~~Operating income was $31.9 million~~ The decrease is attributable to a change in mix from acquisitions and the ~~first three months~~cost savings measures being implemented as part of ~~2016 compared with $6.4 million in~~ the ~~first three months~~integration of ~~2015, primarily due to~~ the ~~increase in revenue driven by the acquisitions of ND and Con-way.~~acquired businesses.

Management’s growth strategy for the Logistics segment is to:

Capture additional business in verticals where the Company already has deep logistics expertise and a strong track record;

Expand customer relationships that span North America and Europe;

Market the advantages of the segment’s proprietary technology and global network of facilities;

Optimize all operations to provide world-class service and highly effective solutions that satisfy customers’ logistics related supply chain goals;

Increase share of spend with existing customers who may outsource more of their logistics requirements to XPO, and who may have broader supply chain needs that XPO can service; and

Cross-sell contract logistics and managed transportation solutions to customers of our Transportation segment.

XPO Corporate

Summary of Sales, General and Administrative Expense

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Percent of Revenue				Change		Three Months Ended June 30,				Percent of Revenue				Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				Percent of Revenue				Change
(Dollars in millions)	2016		2015		2016		2015		%
(In millions)											2016		2015		2016		2015		%		2016		2015		2016		2015		%
SG&A expense
Salaries & benefits	$	16.1	$	7.5	0.5	%	1.1	%	114.7	%	$	15.9	$	17.0	0.4	%	1.4	%	(6.5	)%	$	32.0	$	24.4	0.4	%	1.3	%	31.1	%
Other SG&A expense	9.9		2.4		0.3	%	0.3	%	312.5	%	3.8		8.5		0.1	%	0.7	%	(55.3	)%	13.7		10.7		0.2	%	0.6	%	28.0	%
Purchased services	18.5		4.5		0.5	%	0.6	%	311.1	%	13.9		31.5		0.4	%	2.6	%	(55.9	)%	32.4		36.1		0.4	%	1.9	%	(10.2	)%
Depreciation & amortization	0.4		0.4		—		0.1	%	—		0.4		0.4		—		—		—		0.8		0.8		—		—		—
Total SG&A expense	$	44.9	$	14.8	1.3	%	2.1	%	203.4	%	$	34.0	$	57.4	0.9	%	4.7	%	(40.8	)%	$	78.9	$	72.0	1.0	%	3.8	%	9.6	%

Corporate

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015

Corporate SG&A expense in the second quarter of 2016 decreased by $23.4 million compared to the second quarter of 2015 primarily due to a reduction in acquisition-related transaction and integration costs.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Corporate SG&A expense in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 increased by ~~$30.1~~$6.9 million compared to the first ~~three~~six months of 2015 primarily due to ~~acquisition-related transaction and integration costs,~~ an increase in salaries and benefits as the result of a larger employee ~~base, as well as increases in legal costs and share-based compensation.~~

~~Intersegment Eliminations~~

Intersegment eliminations represent intercompany activity between our reportable segments that is eliminated upon consolidation. The difference between operating income (loss) component line items in the Consolidated Summary Financial Table and the sum of the respective line items from the Transportation and Logistics Summary Financial Tables and Corporate Summary of Sales, General and Administrative Expense above represents intercompany eliminations between our reportable segments. The following table summarizes the intersegment eliminations by line item.

~~Intersegment Eliminations~~

~~Summary Financial Table~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2016 2015
Revenue $ (12.4 ) $ —
Cost of transportation and services (12.2 ) —
Net revenue (0.2 ) —
Direct operating expense —
—
SG&A expense
Salaries & benefits 0.2
—
Other SG&A expense (0.2 ) —
Purchased services (0.1 ) —
Depreciation & amortization (0.1 ) —
Total SG&A expense (0.2 ) —
Operating income $ —
$ —
base.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, ~~the Company~~we had ~~$328.2~~$465.8 million of working capital, including cash and cash equivalents of ~~$279.0~~$377.8 million, compared to working capital of $262.8 million, including cash and cash equivalents of $289.8 million, as of December 31, 2015. This increase of ~~$65.4~~$203.0 million in working capital was mainly due to an increase in ~~prepaid~~cash and other current assets.

We continually evaluate our liquidity requirements, capital needs and availability of capital resources based on our operating needs and our planned growth initiatives. In addition to using existing cash balances and net cash provided by operating activities, in certain circumstances we may use debt financings and issuances of equity or equity-related securities to fund our operating needs and growth initiatives. See the discussion below in the Debt Facilities section regarding the Company's multicurrency secured revolving loan credit facility.

In 2016, we anticipate net capital expenditures to be in the range of $475 million to $500 million. Actual 2016 capital expenditures may differ from the estimated amount depending on factors such as the availability and timing of delivery of

equipment. We will continue to evaluate our investments in long-term strategic projects to ensure that our capital

expenditures generate high returns on ~~investments~~investment and take into account our outlook for global economic conditions.

We believe that cash generated from operations, the existing cash balance, and availability under the revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance existing operations.

Cash Flow

During the first ~~three~~six months of 2016, ~~$6.9~~$267.6 million of cash was ~~generated~~provided by operations compared to ~~$47.3~~$23.2 million ~~generated~~used in the comparable period in 2015. ~~Cash flows~~Accounts payable used $78.4 million of cash during the first six months of 2016 compared $22.8 million of cash used in the same period in 2015. Prepaid expenses and other assets used $52.8 million of cash in the first six months of 2016 compared to $2.2 million of cash generated ~~from operations between~~for the same period ~~ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 related to larger non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation~~ in ~~2016. The primary use~~2015. Accounts receivable provided $5.5 million of cash for the period ended March 31, 2016 was the payment of outstanding accounts payable and an increase in cash used for prepaid expense and other assets. The primary source of cash for the period ended March 31, 2015 was the collection of outstanding accounts receivable.

~~Cash generated from revenue equaled $3,576.5 million for the~~ first ~~three~~six months of 2016 as compared to ~~$753.7~~$10.7 million of cash used for the same period in 2015, ~~and correlates directly with~~as we collected more cash from customers during the ~~revenue increase between~~current period. Cash flows from operating activities were adjusted by the ~~two periods. The increase in cash flow is primarily related to a volume increase due to acquisitions between the periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.~~

~~Cash used for payment~~impact of ~~transportation services and direct operating expenses for~~certain non-cash adjustments. In the first ~~three~~six months of 2016, ~~equaled $3,028.6~~net income and non-cash adjustments was $384.1 million as compared to ~~$600.1~~$7.2 million ~~for the same period~~ in ~~2015. The increase in cash outflows between the two periods correlates to the increase in revenue between the two periods. Payroll represents a significant operating expense. For~~ the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. In the first six months of 2016, ~~cash used for payroll was $833.8 million as compared to $110.7 million for the same period in 2015. Other operating uses~~non-cash adjustments included depreciation and amortization expense of ~~cash included SG&A items, which equaled $529.2~~$323.6 million and ~~$118.9~~stock compensation expense of $20.5 million. In the first six months of 2015, non-cash adjustments included depreciation and amortization expense of $89.9 million, ~~for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016~~deferred tax benefit of $29.4 million and ~~2015, respectively.~~stock compensation expense of $16.9 million.

Investing activities used ~~$97.2~~$180.1 million of cash during the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 compared to ~~a use~~$1,635.2 million of ~~$69.6 million~~cash used during the same period in 2015. In the first ~~three~~six months of 2016, ~~$114.7~~$224.0 million was used to purchase fixed assets and ~~$17.5~~$35.6 million was received from the sale of assets. During the same period in 2015, ~~$58.2~~$1,610.7 million was used in acquisitions, ~~and $11.4~~$41.9 million was used to purchase fixed assets and $24.3 million was received from the sale of assets.

Financing activities ~~generated $75.8~~used $0.2 million ~~for~~of cash during the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 compared to ~~$412.5~~$2,189.7 million of cash generated for the same period in 2015. The main ~~sources~~source of cash from financing activities during the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 was the ~~$200.0~~$260.0 million of proceeds from borrowing on the revolving credit ~~facility and $18.3 million of proceeds from bank overdrafts.~~facility. The primary uses of cash during the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 were the repayment of borrowings on the credit facility of ~~$100.0~~$160.0 million and repayment of long-term debt of ~~$41.8~~$90.0 million. During the same period in 2015, the primary source of cash was the ~~$410.2~~$2,547.3 million of net proceeds from the issuance of long-term ~~debt.~~debt and $1,228.1 million of net proceeds from the issuance of preferred and common stock. The primary uses of cash were a transfer to restricted cash for the ND Tender Offer of $809.3 million and the repayment of acquired debt of $759.2 million.

Debt Facilities

On October 30, 2015, the Company entered into the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Credit Agreement (the "ABL Facility") among XPO and certain of XPO’s U.S. and Canadian wholly owned subsidiaries (which include the U.S. subsidiaries of the former Con-way), as borrowers, the other credit parties from time to time party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as agent for such lenders. The ABL Facility replaced XPO’s existing Amended Credit Agreement, and, among other things, (i) increased the commitments under the ABL Facility to $1.0 billion, (ii) permitted the acquisition of Con-way and the transactions relating thereto, (iii) reduced the margin on loans under the ABL Facility by 0.25% from that contained in the existing Amended Credit Agreement and (iv) matures on October 30, 2020 (subject, in certain circumstances, to a springing maturity in the event that XPO’s Senior Notes due 2019 are not repaid or subjected to a cash reserve three months prior to the maturity date thereof). Up to ~~$350~~$515 million of the ABL Facility is available for issuance of letters of credit, and up to $50 million of the ABL Facility is available for swing line loans. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company had a borrowing base of ~~$908.6~~$925.7 million and availability under the ABL Facility of ~~$546.8~~$567.6 million after considering outstanding letters of credit of ~~$261.8~~$257.7 million and an amount drawn of $100.0 million. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the ABL Facility’s financial covenants. ~~Total unamortized debt issuance costs related to the ABL Facility classified in long-term debt at March 31, 2016 were $9.1 million.~~

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company guarantees the lease payments of certain tractor and trailer equipment utilized by subcontract drivers. The guarantee continues through the end of the lease of the equipment, typically four years. The maximum amount of the guarantee is limited to the unpaid principal and interest amounts. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the maximum amount of the guarantees was approximately $14.4 million.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. In certain circumstances, those estimates and assumptions can affect amounts reported in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. We have made our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. We do not believe there is a great likelihood that materially different amounts will be reported related to our accounting policies. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Refer to ~~Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies~~ of Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes a summary of our critical accounting policies. There have been no significant changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

New Pronouncements

Refer to Note 2—Basis of Presentation ~~and Significant Accounting Policies~~, of Item 1, "Financial Statements" for discussion of recently issued accounting standards that are relevant to XPO.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity price risk.

Liquidity Risk.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we held ~~$309.4~~$407.8 million of cash and restricted cash in cash depository and money market ~~funds held in depository accounts at 123 financial institutions.~~funds. The primary market risk associated with these investments is liquidity risk.

Interest Rate ~~Risk.~~ Risk

In conjunction with our June 2015 acquisition of ND, we assumed ND's asset financing arrangements ("Asset Financing" and "Financial Leases"). At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we had outstanding ~~$241.8~~$197.5 million aggregate principal amount of Asset ~~Financing.~~Financing and $64.8 million of Financial Leases. Approximately 7%92% of the Asset Financing ~~has fixed interest rates~~debt and ~~approximately 93% has~~78% of the Financial Leases have floating interest rates. Our floating rate Asset Financing ~~subjects~~and Financial Leases subject us to risk resulting from changes in ~~short-term~~short-

term (primarily Euribor) interest rates. We use interest rate swaps (exchanging a variable rate for a fixed rate) to manage the fixed and floating interest rate mix of our Asset Financing and Financial Leases and limit our exposure to interest rate risk. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the notional amount of ~~Asset Financing~~ interest rate swaps designated as cash flows hedges was ~~$216.3~~$199.8 million. Assuming a hypothetical 100-basis-point increase in the interest rate, annual interest expense would increase by ~~approximately $0.1 million~~an insignificant amount on our floating rate Asset Financing debt and Financial Leases that isare not hedged with interest rate swaps. For additional information on the Asset Financing, refer to Note 9—Debt, of Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For additional information on the interest rate swaps, refer to Note ~~12—~~11—Derivative Instruments of the condensed consolidated financial statements included within.

We have exposure to changes in interest rates on our revolving credit facility. The interest rates on our revolving credit facility fluctuate based on LIBOR or a base rate plus an applicable margin. Assuming our $1.0 billion revolving credit facility was fully drawn at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, a hypothetical 100-basis-point increase in the interest rate would increase our annual interest expense by ~~$10.0~~$12.7 million.

On October 30, 2015, XPO entered into a senior secured term loan credit agreement (the “Term Loan Facility”) that provided for a single borrowing of $1.6 billion. The interest rate on the Term Loan Facility fluctuates based on LIBOR or a Base Rate, as defined in the agreement, plus an applicable margin of 4.50%, in the case of LIBOR loans, and 3.50%, in the case of Base Rate loans. A hypothetical 100-basis-point increase in the interest rate would increase our annual interest expense by ~~$16.0~~$11.6 million.

Senior Notes due 2018, 2019, 2021 and 2022 and Senior Debentures due 2034. The fair market value of our outstanding issue of Senior Notes due 2018, Senior Notes due 2019, Senior Notes due 2021, and Senior Notes due 2022 and Senior Debentures due 2034 is subject to interest rate risk. Generally the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Interest rate changes affect the fair market value of the Senior Notes and Senior Debentures, and may affect the prices at which we would be able to repurchase such notes were we to do so. These changes do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. For additional information on the fair value of our outstanding Senior Notes and Senior Debentures, refer to Note 2—Basis of Presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements included within.

Convertible Debt Outstanding. The fair market value of our outstanding issue of Convertible Notes is subject to interest rate and market price risk due to the convertible feature of the notes and other factors. Generally the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The fair market value of the Convertible Notes may also increase as the market price of our stock rises and decrease as the market price of our stock falls. Interest rate and market value changes affect the fair market value of the Convertible Notes, and may affect the prices at which we would be able to repurchase such Convertible Notes were we to do so. These changes do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. For additional information on the fair value of our outstanding Convertible Notes, refer to Note 2—Basis of Presentation ~~and Significant Accounting Policies~~ of the condensed consolidated financial statements included within.

~~Senior Notes due 2018, 2019, 2021 and 2022 and Senior Debentures due 2034~~. The fair market value of our outstanding issue of Senior Notes due 2018, Senior Notes due 2019, Senior Notes due 2021, and Senior Notes due 2022 and Senior Debentures due 2034 is subject to interest rate risk. Generally the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Interest rate changes affect the fair market value of the Senior Notes and Senior Debentures, and may affect the prices at which we would be able to repurchase such notes were we to do so. These changes do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. For additional information on the fair value of our outstanding Senior Notes and Senior Debentures, refer to ~~Note 2—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies~~ ~~of the consolidated financial statements included within.~~

Foreign Currency Exchange ~~Risk.~~Risk

Following the ND acquisition, we have a significant proportion of our net assets and income in non-U.S. dollar currencies, primarily the EUR and British Pound Sterling ("GBP"). We are exposed to currency risk from the potential changes in functional currency values of our foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities and cash flows. Consequently, a depreciation of the EUR and GBP relative to the U.S. dollar could have an adverse impact on our financial results.

In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes due 2022, we entered into certain cross-currency swap agreements to partially manage the related foreign currency exchange risk by effectively converting a portion of the fixed-rate ~~USD-~~

~~denominated~~USD-denominated Senior Notes due 2022, including the semi-annual interest payments, to fixed-rate, EUR-denominated debt. The risk management objective is to manage a portion of the foreign currency risk relating to net investments in subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies. In addition to the cross-currency swaps, we use foreign currency denominated notes as nonderivative hedging instruments of our net investments in foreign operations with the same risk management objective as the cross-currency swaps.

In order to mitigate against the risk of a reduction in the value of foreign currency earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") from the Company’s international operations with the EUR and GBP as the functional currency, the Company uses foreign currency option and forward contracts.

For additional information on the cross-currency swap agreements and foreign currency option and forward contracts, refer to Note ~~12—~~11—Derivative Instruments of the condensed consolidated financial statements included within.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the result of a uniform 10% strengthening in the value of the USD relative to the EUR would result in a decrease in net assets of approximately ~~$41.9~~$38.5 million. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the result of a uniform 10% strengthening in the value of the USD relative to the GBP would result in a decrease in net assets of approximately ~~$44.2~~$40.6 million. These theoretical calculations assume that an instantaneous, parallel shift in exchange rates occurs, which is not consistent with our actual

experience in foreign currency transactions. Fluctuations in exchange rates also affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors' services become more or less attractive. The sensitivity analysis of the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency prices.

Commodity Price ~~Risk.~~Risk

We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of diesel fuel purchased for use in Company-owned vehicles. During the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the price of diesel in France varied by ~~10.2%~~31.5%; the price of diesel in the United Kingdom varied by ~~9.1%~~9.0%; and the price of diesel in the United States varied by ~~7.0%~~14.9%. However, the Company includes price adjustment clauses or cost-recovery mechanisms in many of its customer contracts in the event of a change in the fuel purchase price. The clauses mean that substantially all fluctuations in the purchase price of diesel, except for short-term economic fluctuations, can be passed on to customers in the sales price. Therefore, a hypothetical 10% change in the price of diesel would not be expected to materially alter our financial performance over the long term.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such time such that the material information required to be included in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, and was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except as described below, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting. On February 9, 2015, June 1, 2015, June 8, 2015 and October 30, 2015, the Company completed its acquisitions of UX Specialized Logistics, LLC, Bridge Terminal Transport Services, Inc., Norbert Dentressangle SA, and Con-way Inc., respectively, and is integrating the acquired businesses into the Company’s overall internal control over financial reporting process. Our management is in the process of assessing the internal control over financial reporting at these acquired businesses and is implementing or revising internal controls where necessary. For additional information on these acquisitions, see Note 3—Acquisitions of Item 1, "Financial Statements."

Part II—Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are involved, and will continue to be involved, in numerous legal proceedings arising out of the conduct of our business. These proceedings may include, among other matters, claims for property damage or personal injury incurred in connection with the transportation of freight, claims regarding anti-competitive practices, and employment-related claims, including claims involving asserted breaches of employee restrictive covenants and tortious interference with contract. These proceedings also include numerous purported class-action lawsuits, multi-plaintiff and individual lawsuits and state tax and other administrative proceedings that claim either that our owner operators or contract carriers should be treated as employees, rather than independent contractors, or that certain of our drivers were not paid for all compensable time or were not provided with required meal or rest breaks. We are currently engaged in several alleged independent contractor misclassification claims or other wage and hour claims involving certain companies that we have acquired in our last mile, LTL, full truckload, and intermodal businesses. These lawsuits and proceedings may seek substantial monetary damages (including claims for unpaid wages, overtime, failure to provide meal and rest periods, unreimbursed business expenses and other items), injunctive relief, or both. For additional information about these matters, please refer to Note 5—Contingencies of Item 1, "Financial Statements."

We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any matters to which we are presently party will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~There are no material changes~~In addition to the information set forth in this Form 10-Q and the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A, "Risk Factors," of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2015, you should carefully consider the following risk factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results.

The United Kingdom’s likely exit from the European Union could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Following a referendum in June 2016 in which voters in the United Kingdom ("U.K.") approved an exit from the European Union ("EU"), it is expected that the U.K. government will initiate a process to leave the EU (often referred to as "Brexit") and begin negotiating the terms of the U.K.’s future relationship with the EU. The likely exit of the U.K. from the EU will have uncertain impacts on our Transportation and Logistics operations in Europe. In 2015, we derived approximately 37% of our revenue in Europe, including 12% in the U.K. Adverse consequences of Brexit, such as a deterioration in the U.K.'s and/or EU's economic conditions, currency exchange rates, bilateral trade agreements or regulation of trade, including the potential imposition of tariffs, could reduce demand for our services in the U.K. and/or the EU, or otherwise have a negative impact on our operations, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to comply with trade compliance laws and regulations applicable to our international operations may subject us to liability and result in mandatory or voluntary disclosures to government agencies of transactions or dealings involving sanctioned countries, entities or individuals.

As a result of our acquisition activities, including the ND acquisition in 2015, we have acquired companies with business operations outside the U.S. that were not previously subject to a variety of U.S. laws and regulations, including trade sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). In the course of implementing our compliance processes with respect to the operations of certain of our acquired companies, we have identified transactions or dealings originating in our European business involving countries and entities that are subject to U.S. economic sanctions, including those disclosed in Part II, Item 5 under the heading “Disclosure Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act.” We have filed an initial voluntary disclosure of these matters with OFAC and intend to cooperate with regulatory authorities regarding these matters. We may identify additional transactions or dealings involving sanctioned countries, entities or individuals. The transactions or dealings that we have identified to date, or other similar transactions or dealings that we may identify in the future, could result in negative consequences to us, including government investigations, penalties and reputational harm.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

During the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of ~~364~~169,394 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to certain holders of the Company's Convertible Notes in connection with the conversion of ~~$6,000~~$2,784,000 aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes. The number of shares of our common stock issued in the foregoing transactions equals the number of shares of our common stock presently issuable to holders of the Convertible Notes upon conversion under the original terms of the Convertible Notes. The issuance of these shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with Section 4(a)(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the above transactions. For additional information on the Company's Convertible Notes, refer to Note 9—Debt, of Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, pursuant to the Investment Agreement dated as of June 13, 2011 (the "Investment Agreement"), by and among Jacobs Private Equity, LLC ("JPE"), and the other investors party thereto (collectively with JPE, the "Investors"), the Company issued 2,143 unregistered shares of its common stock as a result of the exercise of warrants by certain shareholders. The Company received total proceeds of $15,000 as a result of the exercise of warrants which will be used for general corporate purposes. The issuance of these shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with Section 4(a)(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

~~None.~~Disclosure Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act

The following activity is disclosed pursuant to Section 13(r)(1)(D) of the Exchange Act:

In connection with ongoing efforts to review and enhance our compliance program, including in particular with respect to non-U.S. operations acquired by XPO in 2015 and not subject prior to their acquisition by XPO to U.S. trade sanction regulations and other U.S. regulations, we learned that, in July 2015, one of our European business units provided forwarding services for a shipment of sealing compound to Bou Ali Sina Petrochemical Company, an entity designated as a Government of Iran entity under Executive Order 13599, via a carrier, Iran Air, that was designated at the time (and until January 2016) as a Specially Designated National under Executive Order 13382 ("Iran Air"). We received 549.20 Euros for our services in connection with this shipment; and had net profit of 88.69 Euros attributable to this transaction. We also learned that, in December 2015, the same European business unit provided intra-European transportation services for an axle replacement part that was ultimately destined to Iran Air. We received 725.00 Euros for our services in connection with this shipment; and had net profit of 282.00 Euros attributable to this transaction. We have filed an initial voluntary disclosure of these matters with the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, and intend to cooperate with regulatory authorities regarding these matters.

Item 6. Exhibits.



Exhibit Number		Description

10.1 +*		Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 11, 2016 (the “February 11, 2016 Form 8-K”).

10.2 +*		~~Exhibit A to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016, between the Company and Bradley S. Jacobs (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K).~~

10.3 +*		~~Exhibit A to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016, between the Company and Troy A. Cooper (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K).~~

10.4 +*		~~Exhibit A to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016, between the Company and John J. Hardig (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K).~~

10.5 +*		~~Exhibit A to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016, between the Company and Gordon E. Devens (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K).~~

10.6 +*		~~Exhibit A to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016, between the Company and Scott B. Malat (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K).~~

10.7 +**		Exhibit A to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2016, between the Company and Mario A. Harik. (Form of Employment Agreement previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K)

10.8 +*		~~Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the February 11, 2016 Form 8-K).~~

10.9 +*		~~Form of Amendment to PRSU Agreements, dated March 7, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 8, 2016).~~

31.1		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016

31.2		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016

32.1 ***		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016

32.2 ***		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase



*	~~Incorporated by reference.~~
**	Furnished herewith.
+	~~This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

XPO Logistics, Inc.

/s/ Bradley S. Jacobs

Bradley S. Jacobs

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ John J. Hardig

John J. Hardig

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: ~~May 5,~~August 8, 2016

3836



	Series A Preferred Stock			Common Stock								Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
(Dollars in millions)	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Cash Flow & Net Investment Hedges			Employee Benefit Plans			Non-controlling Interests		Total
Balance, December 31, 2015	73	$	42.0	109,523	$	0.1	$	3,212.3	$	(465.0	)	$	(61.8	)	$	6.7		$	(17.2	)	$	343.7	$	3,060.8
Net loss	—	—		—	—		—		(22.5		)	—			—			—			3.2		$	(19.3	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of $14.7 total tax effect	—	—		—	—		—		—			44.1			(19.1		)	—			8.7		$	33.7
Exercise of warrants and stock options and other	—	—		213	—		0.4		—			—			—			—			—		$	0.4
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of senior notes, net of tax	—	—		1	—		—		—			—			—			—			—		$	—
Dividend paid	—	—		—	—		—		(0.7		)	—			—			—			—		$	(0.7	)
Stock compensation expense	—	—		—	—		6.7		—			—			—			—			—		$	6.7
Balance, March 31, 2016	73	$	42.0	109,737	$	0.1	$	3,219.4	$	(488.2	)	$	(17.7	)	$	(12.4	)	$	(17.2	)	$	355.6	$	3,081.6



(Dollars in millions)	2016		2017		2018		2019		2020
Estimated amortization expense	$	133.8	$	166.1	$	158.1	$	151.8	$	145.7



(Dollars in millions)	U.S. Qualified Plans			U.S. Non-Qualified Plans		UK Plans
Net periodic benefit expense (income):
Interest cost	$	19.0		$	0.8	$	11.5
Expected return on plan assets	(22.1		)	—		(14.9		)
Net periodic benefit expense (income)	$	(3.1	)	$	0.8	$	(3.4	)



(Dollars in millions)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Net periodic benefit expense:
Service cost - benefits earned during the year	$	0.2
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	0.5
Net periodic benefit expense	$	0.7



	Stock Options
	Number of Stock Options		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Exercise Price Range	Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average Remaining Term


Outstanding at December 31, 2015	2,004,280		$	16.66	$2.68 - $31.88	$	6.06	4.57
Exercised	(97,565	)	19.91		$2.68 - $25.18	6.90
Forfeited or expired	(180,848	)	29.70		$27.69 - $29.79	1.53
Outstanding at March 31, 2016	1,725,867		$	15.11	$3.88 - $31.88	$	6.54	4.96
Options exercisable at March 31, 2016	1,408,612		$	14.76	$3.88 - $31.88	$	6.01	4.50



	Stock Appreciation Rights
	Number of Rights		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Term


Outstanding at December 31, 2015	143,603		$	15.61	1.79
Exercised	(6,299	)	15.61		—
Outstanding at March 31, 2016	137,304		$	15.61	1.43
SARs exercisable at March 31, 2016	137,304		15.61		1.43



	Restricted Stock Units				Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Restricted Stock Units		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		Number of Performance-based Restricted Stock Units		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value


Outstanding at December 31, 2015	1,558,441		$	23.01	1,987,060		$	21.47
Granted	45,507		26.47		—		—
Vested	(95,220	)	30.17		(103,530	)	32.47
Forfeited	(79,816	)	26.02		(14,505	)	30.03
Outstanding at March 31, 2016	1,428,912		$	22.49	1,869,025		$	18.21



	Cash-settled Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
	Number of Cash-settled Performance-based Restricted Stock Units	Weighted-Average Fair Value


Outstanding at December 31, 2015	—	$	—
Granted	2,486,912	22.92
Outstanding at March 31, 2016	2,486,912	$	30.70



	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2016			2015
Revenue	$	(12.4	)	$	—
Cost of transportation and services	(12.2		)	—
Net revenue	(0.2		)	—
Direct operating expense	—			—
SG&A expense
Salaries & benefits	0.2			—
Other SG&A expense	(0.2		)	—
Purchased services	(0.1		)	—
Depreciation & amortization	(0.1		)	—
Total SG&A expense	(0.2		)	—
Operating income	$	—		$	—

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company