SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q
______________________________________ 
(Mark One)
ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2016
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission File Number 001-31625
______________________________________ 
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
______________________________________ 
Delaware 33-0864902
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
  
4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor
Newport Beach, California
 92660
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 833-3600

______________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  ý    NO  ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filerx
    
Non-accelerated filer
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
Class of Common StockOutstanding at May 6,November 4, 2016
Common stock, Class A, par value $0.0127,856,01027,885,880
Common stock, Class B, par value $0.013,813,884


WILLIAM LYON HOMES
INDEX
 
  
Page
No.
 
Item 1.Financial Statements as of March 31,September 30, 2016, and for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015 (Unaudited) 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.



CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Investors are cautioned that certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as some statements by the Company in periodic press releases and information included in oral statements or other written statements by the Company are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements which are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or which include words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, “hopes”, and similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, information related to: anticipated operating results; home deliveries and backlog conversion; financial resources and condition; cash needs and liquidity; timing of project openings;openings and deliveries; leverage ratios;ratios and compliance with debt covenants; revenues and average selling prices of deliveries; sales price ranges for active and future communities; timing of community openings; global and domestic economic conditions; market and industry trends; profitability and gross margins; selling, general and administrative expenses and leverage; interest expense; inventory write-downs; unrecognized tax benefits; land acquisition spending and timing; debt maturities; the Company's ability to achieve tax benefits and utilize its tax attributes; sales pace; effects of home buyer cancellations; community count; joint ventures; the Company's ability to acquire land and pursue real estate opportunities; the Company's ability to gain approvals and open new communities; the Company's ability to sell homes and properties; the Company's ability to secure materials and subcontractors; the Company's ability to produce the liquidity and capital necessary to expand and take advantage of opportunities; and legal proceedings, insurance and claims. Forward-looking statements are based upon expectations and projections about future events and are subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties about, among other things, the Company, economic and market factors and the homebuilding industry. There is no guarantee that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements in this annualquarterly report on Form 10-Q will occur, or if any of the events occur, there is no guarantee what effect it will have on the Company's operations, financial condition or share price. The Company's past performance, and past or present economic conditions in its housing markets, are not indicative of future performance or conditions. Investors are urged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company will not, and undertakes no obligation to, update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or changes to projections over time unless required by federal securities laws.

Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by us include, but are not limited to: the availability of skilled subcontractors, labor and homebuilding materials and increased construction cycle times; the availability and timing of mortgage financing; adverse weather conditions, including but not limited to the continued drought in California and the Southwest; the Company’s financial leverage and level of indebtedness and any inability to comply with financial and other covenants under its debt instruments; continued volatility and worsening in general economic conditions either internationally, nationally or in regions in which the Company operates; conditions in the Company’s recently entered markets and recently acquired operations; worsening in markets for residential housing; the impact of construction defect, product liability and home warranty claims, including the adequacy of self-insurance accruals, and the applicability and sufficiency of the Company’s insurance coverage; decline in real estate values resulting in impairment of the Company’s real estate assets; volatility in the banking industry and credit markets; uncertainties in the capital and securities markets; the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals and the opening of projects; the availability and cost of land for future development; terrorism or other hostilities involving the United States; changes in governmental laws, regulations and decisions, and increased costs, fees and delays associated therewith; building moratorium or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in states in which the Company operates; changes in mortgage and other interest rates; uncertainties regarding the U.S. presidential election; conditions in the capital, credit and financial markets, including mortgage lending standards and the availability of mortgage financing; changes in generally accepted accounting principles or interpretations of those principles; changes in prices of homebuilding materials; competition for home sales from other sellers of new and resale homes; cancellations and the Company’s ability to convert its backlog into deliveries; the occurrence of events such as landslides, soil subsidence and earthquakes that are uninsurable, not economically insurable or not subject to effective indemnification agreements; changes in governmental laws and regulations; whether the Company is able to pay off or refinance the outstanding balances of its debt obligations at their maturity;maturity and comply with other restrictive debt covenants; limitations on the Company’s ability to utilize its tax attributes; whether an ownership change occurred that could, under certain circumstances, have resulted in the limitation of the Company’s ability to offset prior years’ taxable income with net operating losses; the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals and the opening of projects; the availability and cost of land for future development; and other factors, risks and uncertainties. These and other risks and uncertainties are more fully described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, Part II, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016, and this quarterly report, as well as those factors or conditions described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”



EXPLANATORY NOTE

In this interim report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries. In addition, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “Parent” refers to William Lyon Homes, and “California Lyon” refers to William Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent.



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.Financial Statements
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except number of shares and par value per share)
March 31,
2016
 December 31,
2015
September 30,
2016
 December 31,
2015
(unaudited)  (unaudited)  
ASSETS      
Cash and cash equivalents — Note 1$35,798
 $50,203
$40,710
 $50,203
Restricted cash — Note 1505
 504

 504
Receivables6,124
 14,838
8,121
 14,838
Escrow proceeds receivable3,024
 3,041

 3,041
Real estate inventories — Note 51,753,315
 1,675,106
1,856,034
 1,675,106
Investment in joint ventures — Note 36,414
 5,413
8,414
 5,413
Goodwill66,902
 66,902
66,902
 66,902
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $4,640 as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 20156,700
 6,700
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $4,640 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 20156,700
 6,700
Deferred income taxes, net79,631
 79,726
79,728
 79,726
Other assets, net20,622
 21,017
17,321
 21,017
Total assets$1,979,035
 $1,923,450
$2,083,930
 $1,923,450
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY      
Accounts payable$78,854
 $75,881
$76,921
 $75,881
Accrued expenses71,576
 70,324
82,012
 70,324
Notes payable — Note 6185,817
 175,181
259,342
 175,181
Subordinated amortizing notes — Note 612,390
 14,066
8,970
 14,066
5 3/4% Senior Notes due April 15, 2019 — Note 6
148,429
 148,295
148,691
 148,295
8 1/2% Senior Notes due November 15, 2020 — Note 6
422,887
 422,896
422,852
 422,896
7% Senior Notes due August 15, 2022 — Note 6345,474
 345,338
345,829
 345,338
1,265,427
 1,251,981
1,344,617
 1,251,981
Commitments and contingencies — Note 12

 



 

Equity:      
William Lyon Homes stockholders’ equity      
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
Common stock, Class A, par value $0.01 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 28,964,219 and 28,363,879 shares issued, 27,856,010 and 27,657,435 outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively290
 284
Common stock, Class B, par value $0.01 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 3,813,884 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 201538
 38
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively
 
Common stock, Class A, par value $0.01 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 28,902,681 and 28,363,879 shares issued, 27,885,880 and 27,657,435 outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively289
 284
Common stock, Class B, par value $0.01 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 3,813,884 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 201538
 38
Additional paid-in capital414,226
 413,810
416,736
 413,810
Retained earnings226,977
 217,963
254,607
 217,963
Total William Lyon Homes stockholders’ equity641,531
 632,095
671,670
 632,095
Noncontrolling interests — Note 272,077
 39,374
67,643
 39,374
Total equity713,608
 671,469
739,313
 671,469
Total liabilities and equity$1,979,035
 $1,923,450
$2,083,930
 $1,923,450
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements


WILLIAM LYON HOMES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except number of shares and per share data)
(unaudited)
 
 
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 September 30, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2016
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
Operating revenue          
Home sales$261,295
 $189,715
$342,628
 $244,311
 $928,982
 $681,766
Construction services — Note 13,130
 7,453
86
 4,896
 3,810
 19,304
264,425
 197,168
342,714
 249,207
 932,792
 701,070
Operating costs          
Cost of sales — homes(215,171) (154,081)(285,896) (200,328) (769,705) (554,657)
Construction services — Note 1(2,824) (6,029)(86) (4,146) (3,458) (16,073)
Sales and marketing(14,993) (12,224)(18,246) (15,352) (51,351) (42,480)
General and administrative(17,834) (13,948)(17,360) (13,981) (51,879) (41,344)
Amortization of intangible assets
 (203)
 (45) 
 (710)
Other(323) (536)198
 (592) (612) (1,549)
(251,145) (187,021)(321,390) (234,444) (877,005) (656,813)
Operating income13,280
 10,147
21,324
 14,763
 55,787
 44,257
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures1,181
 248
1,435
 1,018
 3,810
 1,781
Other income, net525
 781
2,050
 1,452
 2,803
 2,875
Income before provision for income taxes14,986
 11,176
24,809
 17,233
 62,400
 48,913
Provision for income taxes — Note 9(5,045) (3,570)(8,295) (4,956) (20,859) (15,780)
Net income9,941
 7,606
16,514
 12,277
 41,541
 33,133
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(927) (924)(3,445) (195) (4,897) (2,092)
Net income available to common stockholders$9,014
 $6,682
$13,069
 $12,082
 $36,644
 $31,041
Income per common share:          
Basic$0.25
 $0.18
$0.36
 $0.33
 $1.00
 $0.85
Diluted$0.24
 $0.18
$0.34
 $0.31
 $0.96
 $0.81
Weighted average common shares outstanding:          
Basic36,651,846
 36,463,995
36,801,464
 36,573,099
 36,746,727
 36,534,554
Diluted38,303,861
 37,633,831
38,333,027
 38,507,267
 38,314,021
 38,400,236
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements



WILLIAM LYON HOMES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
William Lyon Homes Stockholders    William Lyon Homes Stockholders    
Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
   
Non-
Controlling
  Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
   
Non-
Controlling
  
Shares Amount Capital Retained Earnings Interests TotalShares Amount Capital Retained Earnings Interests Total
Balance - December 31, 201532,178
 $322
 $413,810
 $217,963
 $39,374
 $671,469
32,178
 $322
 $413,810
 $217,963
 $39,374
 $671,469
Net income
 
 
 9,014
 927
 9,941

 
 
 36,644
 4,897
 41,541
Cash contributions from members of consolidated entities
 
 
 
 33,241
 33,241

 
 
 
 36,140
 36,140
Cash distributions to members of consolidated entities
 
 
 
 (1,465) (1,465)
 
 
 
 (12,768) (12,768)
Shares remitted to Company to satisfy employee tax obligations(70) (1) (843) 
 
 (844)(75) (1) (917) 
 
 (918)
Stock based compensation expense670
 7
 1,485
 
 
 1,492
613
 6
 4,081
 
 
 4,087
Reversal of excess income tax benefit from stock based awards
 
 (226) 
 
 (226)
 
 (238) 
 
 (238)
Balance - March 31, 201632,778

$328

$414,226

$226,977

$72,077
 $713,608
Balance - September 30, 201632,716

$327

$416,736

$254,607

$67,643
 $739,313
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements




WILLIAM LYON HOMES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 
Three  
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three  
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2016
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
Operating activities      
Net income$9,941
 $7,606
$41,541
 $33,133
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization498
 557
1,506
 1,936
Net change in deferred income taxes95
 (322)(2) (1,448)
Stock based compensation expense1,492
 1,351
4,087
 4,828
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures(1,181) (248)(3,810) (1,781)
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures324
 76
896
 696
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Restricted cash(1) 
504
 
Receivables2,382
 11
442
 (2,322)
Escrow proceeds receivable17
 (4,278)3,041
 (2,905)
Real estate inventories(77,662) (63,101)(146,678) (323,693)
Other assets317
 978
2,806
 (2,339)
Accounts payable2,973
 7,439
1,040
 63,494
Accrued expenses1,269
 (11,165)11,649
 10,047
Net cash used in operating activities(59,536) (61,096)(82,978) (220,354)
Investing activities      
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures
 (1,000)
 (1,000)
Collection of related party note receivable6,188
 
6,188
 
Purchases of property and equipment(526) (150)(773) (1,288)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities5,662

(1,150)5,415

(2,288)
Financing activities      
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable53,162
 6,148
111,992
 84,926
Principal payments on notes payable(26,526) (6,962)(91,250) (21,123)
Proceeds from issuance of 7% senior notes
 51,000
Proceeds from borrowings on Revolver55,000
 89,000
198,000
 194,000
Payments on Revolver(71,000) (40,000)(167,000) (109,000)
Principal payments on subordinated amortizing notes(1,676) (1,760)(5,096) (4,999)
Payment of deferred loan costs(197) (561)(792) (1,755)
Proceeds from stock options exercised
 106

 106
Shares remitted to, or withheld by the Company for employee tax withholding(844) (1,632)(918) (1,826)
Excess income tax benefit from stock based awards(226) 
(238) 
Noncontrolling interest contributions33,241
 
36,140
 13,125
Noncontrolling interest distributions(1,465) (5,414)(12,768) (8,204)
Net cash provided by financing activities39,469
 38,925
68,070
 196,250
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(14,405) (23,321)(9,493) (26,392)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period50,203
 52,771
50,203
 52,771
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period$35,798
 $29,450
$40,710
 $26,379
   
Cash paid during the year for income taxes$100
 $6,229
Supplemental disclosures:   
Cash paid during the period for income taxes$6,914
 $10,731
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:      
Issuance of note payable related to land acquisition$
 $9,500
$32,419
 $9,500
Accrued deferred loan costs$43
 $
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements


WILLIAM LYON HOMES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Operations
William Lyon Homes, a Delaware corporation (“Parent” and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), is primarily engaged in designing, constructing, marketing and selling single-family detached and attached homes in California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado (under the Village Homes brand), Washington and Oregon (each under the Polygon Northwest Homes brand).
Basis of Presentation
The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities as of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and revenues and expenses for the three and nine month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. The significant accounting policies using estimates include real estate inventories and cost of sales, impairment of real estate inventories, warranty reserves, loss contingencies, sales and profit recognition, accounting for variable interest entities, business combinations, and valuation of deferred tax assets. The current economic environment increases the uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries and joint ventures, and certain joint ventures and other entities which have been determined to be variable interest entities ("VIEs") in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary (see Note 2). The accounting policies of the joint ventures are substantially the same as those of the Company. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared from our books and records without audit and include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. Readers of this quarterly report should refer to our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, which are included in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as certain disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the audited financial statements have not been included in this report.
Real Estate Inventories
Real estate inventories are carried at cost net of impairment losses, if any. Real estate inventories consist primarily of land deposits, land and land under development, homes completed and under construction, and model homes. All direct and indirect land costs, offsite and onsite improvements and applicable interest and other carrying charges are capitalized to real estate projects during periods when the project is under development. Land, offsite costs and all other common costs are allocated to land parcels benefited based upon relative fair values before construction. Onsite construction costs and related carrying charges (principally interest and property taxes) are allocated to the individual homes within a phase based upon the relative sales value of the homes. The Company relieves its real estate inventories through cost of sales for the estimated cost of homes sold. Selling expenses and other marketing costs are expensed in the period incurred. From time to time the Company sells land to third parties. The Company does not consider these sales to be core to its homebuilding business, and any gain or loss recognized on these transactions is recorded in other non-operating income. During the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 the Company sold a parceltwo and five parcels of land, torespectively, resulting in a third party that did not result in any$2.7 million gain or loss.for both periods then ended.
A provision for warranty costs relating to the Company’s limited warranty plans is included in cost of sales and accrued expenses at the time the sale of a home is recorded. The Company generally reserves a percent of the sales price of its homes, or a set amount per home closed depending on the operating division, against the possibility of future charges relating to its warranty programs and similar potential claims. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include the number of homes under warranty, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. The Company continually assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015, are as follows (in thousands):
 


 Three  
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three  
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
Warranty liability, beginning of period$18,117
 $18,155
Warranty provision during period1,429
 1,391
Warranty payments during period(3,290) (2,011)
Warranty charges related to construction services projects103
 180
Warranty liability, end of period$16,359
 $17,715
The Company began accruing for warranty costs for units closed in the Washington and Oregon segments at a set rate per home in conjunction with the acquisition of Polygon Northwest Homes during 2014. The Company did not assume any warranty liability for units closed prior to the acquisition date.
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2016
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
Warranty liability, beginning of period$18,117
 $18,155
Warranty provision during period7,086
 4,570
Warranty payments during period(10,579) (5,870)
Warranty charges related to construction services projects128
 747
Warranty liability, end of period$14,752
 $17,602
Interest incurred under the Company’s debt obligations, as more fully discussed in Note 6, is capitalized to qualifying real estate projects under development. Interest activity for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
 
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 September 30, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
 
Nine
Months   Ended
September 30, 2016
 
Nine
Months   Ended
September 30, 2015
Interest incurred$20,261
 $18,033
$21,293
 $19,271
 $62,112
 $55,915
Less: Interest capitalized20,261
 18,033
21,293
 19,271
 62,112
 55,915
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$
 $
$
 $
 $
 $
Cash paid for interest$14,911
 $11,700
$14,898
 $12,565
 $54,576
 $47,590
Construction Services
The Company accounts for construction management agreements using the Percentage of Completion Method in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 605 Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”). Under ASC 605, the Company records revenues and expenses as a contracted project progresses, and based on the percentage of costs incurred to date compared to the total estimated costs of the contract.
The Company entered into construction management agreements to build, sell and market homes in certain communities. For such services, the Company will receive fees (generally 3 to 5 percent of the sales price, as defined) and may, under certain circumstances, receive additional compensation if certain financial thresholds are achieved.
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, and deposits. The Company typically places its cash and cash equivalents in investment grade short-term instruments. Deposits, included in other assets, are due from municipalities or utility companies and are generally collected from such entities through fees assessed to other developers. The Company is an issuer of, or subject to, financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business which exposes it to credit risks. These financial instruments include letters of credit and obligations in connection with assessment district bonds. These off-balance sheet financial instruments are described in more detail in Note 12.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance exceeds federally insurable limits as of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The Company monitors the cash balances in its operating accounts, however, these cash balances could be negatively impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or are subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. To date, the Company has experienced no loss or lack of access to cash in its operating accounts.



Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of deposits made by the Company to a bank account as collateral for the use of letters of credit to guarantee the Company’s financial obligations under certain other contractual arrangements in the normal course of business.


Deferred Loan Costs
Deferred loan costs represent debt issuance costs and are primarily amortized to interest incurred using the straight line method which approximates the effective interest method.
Goodwill
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 350, Intangibles, Goodwill and Other, goodwill amounts are not amortized, but rather are analyzed for impairment at the reporting segment level. Goodwill is analyzed on an annual basis, or when indicators of impairment exist. We have determined that we have six reporting segments, as discussed in Note 4, and we perform an annual goodwill impairment analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.
Intangibles
Recorded intangible assets primarily relate to brand names of acquired entities, construction management contracts, homes in backlog, and joint venture management fee contracts recorded in conjunction with FASB ASC Topic 852, Reorganizations ("ASC 852"), or FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). All Intangibleintangible assets with the exception of those relating to brand names were valued based on expected cash flows related to home closings, and the asset is amortized on a per unit basis, as homes under the contracts close. Our brand name intangible assets are deemed to have an indefinite useful life.
Income per common share
The Company computes income per common share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, which requires income per common share for each class of stock to be calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an allocation of income between the holders of common stock and a company’s participating security holders.
Basic income per common share is computed by dividing income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For purposes of determining diluted income per common share, basic income per common share is further adjusted to include the effect of potential dilutive common shares.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 740, Income Taxes, using an asset and liability approach. Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards measured by applying currently enacted tax laws. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce net deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be considered “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. In addition, the Company has elected to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax provision.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which clarifies existing accounting literature relating to how and when revenue is recognized by an entity. ASU 2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, an entity will need to exercise a greater degree of judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. ASU 2014-09 is effective for public companies for interim and annual


reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied either retrospectively or using the cumulative effect transition method, with early adoption not permitted. The Company has not yet selected a transition method, and is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02 "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" ("ASU 2015-02"). ASU 2015-02 amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities and voting interest


entities, among other items, by eliminating the consolidation model previously applied to limited partnerships, emphasizing the risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest and reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public companies for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"), which amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting(ASU("ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects for the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impactdoes not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain balances on the financial statements and certain amounts presented in the notes have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation.

Note 2—Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests
As of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company was party to eleven and eight joint ventures, respectively, for the purpose of land development and homebuilding activities which we have determined to be VIEs. The Company, as the managing member, has the power to direct the activities of the VIEs since it manages the daily operations and has exposure to the risks and rewards of the VIEs, based upon the allocation of income and loss per the respective joint venture agreements. Therefore, the Company is the primary beneficiary of the joint ventures, and the VIEs were consolidated as of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the assets of the consolidated VIEs totaled $226.7$226.1 million, of which $5.1$4.1 million was cash and cash equivalents and $220.2$221.2 million was real estate inventories. The liabilities of the consolidated VIEs totaled $127.1$129.3 million, primarily comprised of notes payable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
As of December 31, 2015, the assets of the consolidated VIEs totaled $155.0 million, of which $2.8 million was cash and cash equivalents and $148.6 million was real estate inventories. The liabilities of the consolidated VIEs totaled $97.1 million, primarily comprised of notes payable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.


Note 3—Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The table set forth below summarizes the combined unaudited statements of operations for our unconsolidated mortgage joint ventures that we accounted for under the equity method (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 Three Months Ended March 31, 2015Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Revenues$3,967
 $706
$5,397
 $3,100
 $14,675
 $6,634
Cost of sales(1,925) (382)(2,521) (1,453) (7,043) (3,459)
Income of unconsolidated joint ventures$2,042
 $324
$2,876
 $1,647
 $7,632
 $3,175

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations represents our share of the income of our unconsolidated mortgage joint ventures, which is allocated based on the provisions of the underlying joint venture operating agreements less any additional impairments recorded against our investments in joint


ventures which we do not deem recoverable.  For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, and 2015, the Company recorded


income of $1.2$1.4 million and $0.2$3.8 million, and $1.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, from its unconsolidated joint ventures. This income was primarily attributable to our share of income related to mortgages that were generated and issued to qualifying home buyers during the periods.

During the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, and 2015, all of our unconsolidated joint ventures were reviewed for impairment.  Based on the impairment review, no investments in joint ventures were determined to be impaired.
The table set forth below summarizes the combined unaudited balance sheets for our unconsolidated joint ventures that we accounted for under the equity method (in thousands):
 March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
AssetsAssets    Assets    
Cash $7,037
 $6,340
Cash $12,156
 $6,340
Loans held for sale 30,294
 29,312
Loans held for sale 20,525
 29,312
Accounts receivable 159
 309
Accounts receivable 1,081
 309
Other assets 61
 390
Other assets 44
 390
 Total Assets $37,551
 $36,351
 Total Assets $33,806
 $36,351
        
Liabilities and EquityLiabilities and Equity    Liabilities and Equity    
Accounts payable $326
 $651
Accounts payable $499
 $651
Accrued expenses835
 774
Accrued expenses981
 774
Credit lines payable27,613
 27,350
Credit lines payable19,249
 27,350
Other liabilities21
 515
Other liabilities18
 515
Members equity8,756
 7,061
Members equity13,059
 7,061
 Total Liabilities and Equity$37,551
 $36,351
 Total Liabilities and Equity$33,806
 $36,351

Note 4—Segment Information
The Company operates one principal homebuilding business. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting ("ASC 280"), the Company has determined that each of its operating divisions is an operating segment.Thesegment. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief operating decision maker. The Company’s chief operating decision maker directs the allocation of resources to operating segments based on the profitability and cash flows of each respective segment.
The Company’s homebuilding operations design, construct and sell a wide range of homes designed to meet the specific needs in each of its markets. As such, in accordance with the aggregation criteria defined by FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), the Company’s homebuilding operating segments have been grouped into six reportable segments:
California, consisting of operating divisions in i) Southern California, consisting of operations in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties; and ii) Northern California, consisting of operations in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, and Santa Clara counties.
Arizona, consisting of operations in the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area.
Nevada, consisting of operations in the Las Vegas, Nevada metropolitan area.
Colorado, consisting of operations in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area.
Washington, consisting of operations in the Seattle, Washington metropolitan area.
Oregon, consisting of operations in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan area.
Corporate develops and implements strategic initiatives and supports the Company’s operating segments by centralizing key administrative functions such as finance and treasury, information technology, risk management and litigation and human resources. All prior periods have been restated to reflect the Company's current segment reporting structure.
Segment financial information relating to the Company’s operations was as follows (in thousands):


Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 September 30, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2016
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
Operating revenue:          
California (1)
$95,884
 $86,793
$111,520
 $65,661
 $309,199
 $240,115
Arizona21,047
 7,186
28,758
 21,088
 85,399
 38,782
Nevada30,741
 27,242
49,600
 31,924
 128,996
 89,937
Colorado26,393
 18,189
35,316
 23,864
 85,885
 69,457
Washington32,901
 31,280
42,247
 46,905
 112,512
 124,371
Oregon57,459
 26,478
75,273
 59,765
 210,801
 138,408
Total operating revenue$264,425
 $197,168
$342,714
 $249,207
 $932,792
 $701,070
          
(1) Operating revenue in the California segment includes construction services revenue.
(1) Operating revenue in the California segment includes construction services revenue.
(1) Operating revenue in the California segment includes construction services revenue.
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
       
Income before provision for income taxes   
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 September 30, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2016
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
Income before provision for income taxes:       
California$9,923
 $9,312
$10,364
 $5,679
 $28,252
 $26,756
Arizona1,499
 304
2,542
 1,692
 7,537
 2,302
Nevada2,558
 3,362
5,291
 2,611
 12,587
 8,660
Colorado429
 (170)2,342
 742
 3,643
 1,381
Washington1,423
 2,573
2,899
 5,609
 6,767
 12,501
Oregon6,958
 2,245
9,466
 6,698
 27,452
 14,809
Corporate(7,804) (6,450)(8,095) (5,798) (23,838) (17,496)
Income before provision for income taxes$14,986
 $11,176
$24,809
 $17,233
 $62,400
 $48,913
 
March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Homebuilding assets:      
California$705,240
 $721,066
$756,603
 $721,066
Arizona203,202
 197,828
203,015
 197,828
Nevada206,081
 183,019
200,652
 183,019
Colorado118,789
 118,307
135,680
 118,307
Washington324,574
 249,615
331,313
 249,615
Oregon231,654
 228,183
258,729
 228,183
Corporate (1)189,495
 225,432
197,938
 225,432
Total homebuilding assets$1,979,035
 $1,923,450
$2,083,930
 $1,923,450
 
(1)Comprised primarily of cash and cash equivalents, deferred income taxes, receivables, and other assets.



Note 5—Real Estate Inventories
Real estate inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
 


March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Real estate inventories:      
Land deposits$68,885
 $61,514
$55,612
 $61,514
Land and land under development1,041,612
 1,013,650
1,056,781
 1,013,650
Homes completed and under construction539,746
 495,966
634,621
 495,966
Model homes103,072
 103,976
109,020
 103,976
Total$1,753,315
 $1,675,106
$1,856,034
 $1,675,106
 

Note 6—Senior Notes, Secured, and Unsecured Indebtedness
Senior notes, secured, and unsecured indebtedness consist of the following (in thousands):
March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Notes payable:      
Construction notes payable$136,817
 $110,181
$130,923
 $110,181
Seller financing32,419
 
Revolving line of credit49,000
 65,000
96,000
 65,000
Total notes payable185,817
 175,181
259,342
 175,181
      
Subordinated amortizing notes12,390
 14,066
8,970
 14,066
      
Senior notes:      
5 3/4% Senior Notes due April 15, 2019
148,429
 148,295
148,691
 148,295
8 1/2% Senior Notes due November 15, 2020
422,887
 422,896
422,852
 422,896
7% Senior Notes due August 15, 2022345,474
 345,338
345,829
 345,338
Total senior notes916,790
 916,529
917,372
 916,529
      
Total notes payable and senior notes$1,114,997
 $1,105,776
$1,185,684
 $1,105,776

As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the maturities of the Notes payable, Subordinated amortizing notes, 5 3/4% Senior Notes, 8 1/2% Senior Notes, and 7% Senior Notes are as follows (in thousands):
 
Year Ending December 31,  
2016$15,179
$
2017135,829
78,844
201814,673
59,814
2019182,526
279,654
2020425,000
425,000
Thereafter350,000
350,000
$1,123,207
$1,193,312
Maturities above exclude premium on the 8 1/2% and 7% Senior Notes in an aggregate of $4.5$3.8 million, and deferred loan costs on the 5 3/4%, 8 1/2% and 7% Senior Notes of $12.7$11.4 million as of September 30, 2016.March 31, 2016.




Notes Payable
Construction Notes Payable
The Company and certain of its consolidated joint ventures have entered into construction notes payable agreements. These loans will be repaid with proceeds from closings and are secured by the underlying projects. The issuance date, facility size, maturity date and interest rate are listed in the table below as of March 31,September 30, 2016 (in millions):

Issuance Date Facility Size Outstanding Maturity Current Rate  Facility Size Outstanding Maturity Current Rate 
March, 2016 $33.4
 $14.7
 September, 2018 3.44%(1) $33.4
 $15.8
 September, 2018 3.53%(1)
January, 2016 35.0
 17.6
 February, 2019 3.68%(2) 35.0
 18.8
 February, 2019 3.78%(2)
November, 2015 42.5
 15.3
 November, 2017 4.50%(1) 42.5
 19.5
 November, 2017 4.50%(1)
August, 2015 (4)
 14.2
 2.8
 August, 2017 4.50%(1) 14.2
 0.7
 August, 2017 4.50%(1)
August, 2015 (4)
 37.5
 10.4
 August, 2017 4.50%(1) 37.5
 7.0
 August, 2017 4.50%(1)
July, 2015 22.5
 14.9
 July, 2018 4.00%(3) 22.5
 14.8
 July, 2018 4.00%(3)
April, 2015 18.5
 13.2
 October, 2017 4.00%(3) 18.5
 13.9
 October, 2017 4.00%(3)
November, 2014 24.0
 17.2
 November, 2017 4.00%(3) 24.0
 13.1
 November, 2017 4.00%(3)
November, 2014 22.0
 15.5
 November, 2017 4.00%(3) 22.0
 12.7
 November, 2017 4.00%(3)
March, 2014 26.0
 15.2
 October, 2016 3.43%(1) 26.0
 14.6
 April, 2018 3.53%(1)
 $275.6
 $136.8
    $275.6
 $130.9
   
(1) Loan bears interest at the Company's option of either LIBOR +3.0% or the prime rate +1.0%.
(2) Loan bears interest at LIBOR +3.25%
(3) Loan bears interest at the prime rate +0.5%.
(4) Loan relates to a project that is wholly-owned by the Company.
The construction notes payable contain certain financial maintenance covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of September 30, 2016.
Seller Financing
At September 30, 2016, the Company had $32.4 million of notes payable outstanding related to two land acquisitions for which seller financing was provided. The first note of approximately $3.0 million bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, is secured by the underlying land, and matures in August 2017. This note was entered into with a related party. Refer to Note 8 for more details regarding the related party transaction. The second note of $29.4 million bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, is secured by the underlying land, and matures in June 2018.
Revolving Line of Credit
On March 27, 2015, WilliamJuly 1, 2016, California Lyon Homes, Inc., a California corporation ("California Lyon") and Parent entered into an amendment and restatement agreement pursuant to which its existing credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility, of up to $100 million (the "Revolver")as previously amended and restated on March 27, 2015 as described below, was further amended and restated in its entirety (as so further amended and restated, the “Amended Facility”"Second Amended Facility"). The Second Amended Facility amends and restates the RevolverCompany’s previous $130.0 million revolving credit facility and provides for total lending commitments of $130.0$145.0 million. In addition, the Second Amended Facility has an uncommitted accordion feature under which the Company may increase the total principal amount up to a maximum aggregate of $200.0 million under certain circumstances, as well as a sublimit of $50.0 million for letters of credit. The Second Amended Facility, among other things, also amended the maturity date of the previous facility to July 1, 2019, provided that the Second Amended Facility will terminate on January 14, 2019 (the “Springing Termination Date”) if, on the Springing Termination Date, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of California Lyon’s 5.75% senior notes due 2019 is equal to or greater than the sum of (a) 50% of the Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) of California Lyon, Parent, certain of the Parent’s direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (together with California Lyon and Parent, the “Loan Parties”) and their Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) for the four-quarter period ending September 30, 2018, plus (b) the Liquidity (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) of the Loan Parties and their consolidated subsidiaries on the Springing Termination Date. Further, the Second Amended Facility amended the maximum leverage ratio covenant to extend the timing of the gradual step-downs. Specifically, pursuant to the Second Amended Facility, the maximum leverage ratio will remain at 65% from June 30, 2016 through and including December 30, 2016, will decrease to 62.5% on the last day


of the 2016 fiscal year, remain at 62.5% from December 31, 2016 through and including June 29, 2017, and will further decrease to 60% on the last day of the second quarter of 2017 and remain at 60% thereafter. The Second Amended Facility did not revise any of our other financial covenants thereunder.
Prior to the entry into the Second Amended Facility as described above, on March 27, 2015, California Lyon and Parent entered into an amendment and restatement agreement which amended and restated the Company's previous $100 million revolving credit facility and provided for total lending commitments of $130.0 million, an uncommitted accordion feature under which the Company could increase the total principal amount up to a maximum aggregate of $200.0 million under certain circumstances (up from a maximum aggregate of $125.0 million under the previous facility), as well as a sublimit of $50.0 million for letters of credit, and extendsextended the maturity date of the previous facility by one year to August 7, 2017.
The Second Amended Facility contains variouscertain financial maintenance covenants, including financial covenants relating to(a) a minimum tangible net worth leverage, liquidityrequirement of $451.0 million (which is subject to increase over time based on subsequent earnings and interest coverage,proceeds from equity offerings, as well as deferred tax assets to the extent included on the Company's financial statements), (b) a limitation on investmentsmaximum leverage covenant that prohibits the leverage ratio (as defined therein) from exceeding 65%, which maximum leverage ratio decreases to 62.5% effective as of December 31, 2016, and further decreases to 60% effective as of June 30, 2017, and (c) a covenant requiring us to maintain either (i) an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest incurred, as defined therein) of at least 1.50 to 1.00 or (ii) liquidity (as defined therein) of an amount not less than the greater of our consolidated interest incurred during the trailing 12 months and $50.0 million. Our compliance with these financial covenants is measured by calculations and metrics that are specifically defined or described by the terms of the Second Amended Facility and can differ in joint ventures and non-guarantor subsidiaries.certain respects from comparable GAAP or other commonly used terms. The Second Amended Facility contains customary events of default, subject to cure periods in certain circumstances, including: nonpayment of principal, interest and fees or other amounts; violation of covenants; inaccuracy of representations and warranties; cross default to certain other indebtedness; unpaid judgments; and certain bankruptcy and other insolvency events. The occurrence of any event of default could result in the termination of the commitments under the Second Amended Facility and permit the lenders to accelerate payment on outstanding borrowings under the Second Amended Facility and require cash collateralization of outstanding letters of credit. If a change in control (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) occurs, the lenders may terminate the commitments under the Second Amended Facility and require that the the Company repay outstanding borrowings under the Second Amended Facility and cash collateralize outstanding letters of credit. Interest rates on borrowings generally will be based on either LIBOR or a base rate, plus the applicable spread. The commitment fee on the unused portion of the Amended Facility currently accrues at an annual rate of 0.50%. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Second Amended Facility as of March 31,September 30, 2016.
Borrowings under the Second Amended Facility, the availability of which is subject to a borrowing base formula, are required to be guaranteed by the Parent and certain of Parent’s direct and indirectthe Parent's wholly-owned subsidiaries, are secured by a pledge of all equity interests held by such guarantors, and may be used for general corporate purposes. Interest rates on borrowings generally will be based on either LIBOR or a base rate, plus the applicable spread. As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the commitment fee on the unused portion of the Second Facility accrues at an annual rate of 0.50%. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had $49.0$96.0 million and $65.0 million outstanding against the Second Amended Facility, respectively, at effective rates of 3.50%4.37% and 3.32%, respectively as well as a letter of credit for $8.6 million outstanding at both dates.




Subordinated Amortizing Notes
On November 21, 2014, in order to pay down amounts borrowed under the senior unsecured bridge loan facility entered into in conjunction with the Polygon Acquisition, the Company completed its public offering and sale of 1,000,000 6.50% tangible equity units (“TEUs”, or "Units"), sold for a stated amount of $100 per Unit, featuring a 17.5% conversion premium.  On December 3, 2014, the Company sold an additional 150,000 TEUs pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Each TEU is a unit composed of two parts: 
a prepaid stock purchase contract (a “purchase contract”); and
a senior subordinated amortizing note (an “amortizing note”).

Unless settled earlier at the holder’s option, each purchase contract will automatically settle on December 1, 2017 (the "mandatory settlement date"), and the Company will deliver not more than 5.2247 shares of Class A Common Stock and not less than 4.4465 shares of Class A Common Stock on the mandatory settlement date, subject to adjustment, based upon the applicable settlement rate and applicable market value of Class A Common Stock.
Each amortizing note had an initial principal amount of $18.01, bears interest at the annual rate of 5.50% and has a final installment payment date of December 1, 2017. On each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, commencing on March 1, 2015, William Lyon Homes will pay equal quarterly installments of $1.6250 on each amortizing note (except for the


March 1, 2015 installment payment, which was $1.8056 per amortizing note). Each installment will constitute a payment of interest and a partial repayment of principal. The amortizing notes rank equally in right of payment to all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, other than borrowings under the Amended Facility and the Company's secured project level financing, which will be senior in right of payment to the obligations under the amortizing notes, in each case to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.
Each TEU may be separated into its constituent purchase contract and amortizing note on any business day during the period beginning on, and including, the business day immediately succeeding the date of initial issuance of the Units to, but excluding, the third scheduled trading day immediately preceding the mandatory settlement date. Prior to separation, the purchase contracts and amortizing notes may only be purchased and transferred together as Units. The net proceeds received from the TEU issuance were allocated between the amortizing note and the purchase contract under the relative fair value method, with amounts allocated to the purchase contract classified as additional paid-in capital. As of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the amortizing notes had an unamortized carrying value of $12.4$9.0 million and $14.1 million, respectively.

Senior Notes
5 3/4% Senior Notes Due 2019
On March 31, 2014, California Lyon completed its private placement with registration rights of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (the "5.75% Notes"), in an aggregate principal amount of $150 million. The 5.75% Notes were issued at 100% of their aggregate principal amount. In August 2014, we exchanged 100% of the initial 5.75% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).
As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the 5.75% Notes was $150 million, excluding deferred loan costs of $1.6$1.3 million. The 5.75% Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15, and mature on April 15, 2019. The 5.75% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several unsecured basis by Parent and certain of its existing and future restricted subsidiaries. The 5.75% Notes and the related guarantees are California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt, including California Lyon’s $425 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020 and $350 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% Notes, each as described below. The 5.75% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt. The 5.75% Notes and the guarantees are and will be effectively junior to California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.

8 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2020
On November 8, 2012, California Lyon completed its private placement with registration rights of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020, (the "initial 8.5% notes"), in an aggregate principal amount of $325 million. The initial 8.5% Notes were issued at 100%


of their aggregate principal amount. In July 2013, we exchanged 100% of the initial 8.5% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act.

On October 24, 2013, California Lyon completed its private placement with registration rights of an additional $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “additional 8.5 %8.5% Notes”, and together with the initial 8.5% notes, the "8.5% Notes" ) at an issue price of 106.5% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest from and including May 15, 2013, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $104.7 million. In February 2014, we exchanged 100% of the additional 8.5% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act.
As of March 31,September 30, 2016 the outstanding principal amount of the 8.5% Notes was $425 million, excluding unamortized premium of $3.6$2.9 million and deferred loan costs of $5.7$5.1 million. The 8.5% Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15, and mature on November 15, 2020. The 8.5% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several unsecured basis by Parent and by certain of its existing and future restricted subsidiaries. The 8.5% Notes and the related guarantees are California Lyon's and the guarantors' unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt, including the 5.75% Notes, as described above, and the 7.00% Notes, as described below. The 8.5% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt. The 8.5% Notes and the guarantees are and will be effectively junior to any of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.



7% Senior Notes Due 2022
On August 11, 2014, WLH PNW Finance Corp. (“Escrow Issuer”), completed its private placement with registration rights of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “initial 7.00% Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million. The initial 7.00% Notes were issued at 100% of their aggregate principal amount. On August 12, 2014, in connection with the consummation of the Polygon Acquisition, Escrow Issuer merged with and into California Lyon, and California Lyon assumed the obligations of the Escrow Issuer under the initial 7.00% Notes and the related indenture by operation of law (the “Escrow Merger”). Following the Escrow Merger, California Lyon is the obligor under the initial 7.00% Notes. In January 2015, we exchanged 100% of the initial 7.00% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act.

On September 15, 2015, California Lyon completed its private placement with registration rights of an additional $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “additional 7.00% Notes”, and together with the intial 7.00% Notes, the "7.00% Notes") at an issue price of 102.0% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest from August 15, 2015, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $50.5 million. In January 2016, we exchanged 100% of the additional 7.00% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act.

As of March 31,September 30, 2016 the outstanding amount of the 7.00% Notes was $350 million, excluding unamortized premium of $0.9 million and deferred loan costs of $5.5$5.0 million. The 7.00% Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15, and mature on August 15, 2022. The 7.00% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several unsecured basis by Parent and certain of its existing and future restricted subsidiaries. The 7.00% Notes and the related guarantees are California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt, including California Lyon’s $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2019 and $425 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020, each as described above. The 7.00% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt. The 7.00% Notes and the guarantees are and will be effectively junior to California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.

Senior Note Covenant Compliance
The indentures governing the 5.75% Notes, the 8.5% Notes, and the 7.00% Notes contain covenants that limit the ability of Parent, California Lyon, and their restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur or guarantee certain additional indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends, distributions, or repurchase equity or make payments in respect of subordinated indebtedness; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) sell assets; (v) incur liens; (vi) enter into agreements restricting the ability of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or transfer assets; (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (viii) create unrestricted subsidiaries; and (viii) consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets. These covenants are subject to a number of


important exceptions and qualifications as described in the indentures. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of March 31,September 30, 2016.

GUARANTOR AND NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following consolidating financial information includes:
(1) Consolidating balance sheets as of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015; consolidating statements of operations for the three and threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015; and consolidating statements of cash flows for the threenine month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015, of (a) William Lyon Homes, as the parent, or “Delaware Lyon”, (b) William Lyon Homes, Inc., as the subsidiary issuer, or “California Lyon”, (c) the guarantor subsidiaries, (d) the non-guarantor subsidiaries and (e) William Lyon Homes, Inc. on a consolidated basis; and
(2) Elimination entries necessary to consolidate Delaware Lyon, with California Lyon and its guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries.
Delaware Lyon owns 100% of all of its guarantor subsidiaries and all guarantees are full and unconditional, joint and several. As a result, in accordance with Rule 3-10 (d) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC, no separate financial statements are required for these subsidiaries as of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and for the three and nine month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015.




CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
As of March 31,September 30, 2016
(in thousands)
 
Unconsolidated    Unconsolidated    
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
ASSETS                      
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $30,178
 $194
 $5,426
 $
 $35,798
$
 $35,703
 $528
 $4,479
 $
 $40,710
Restricted cash
 505
 
 
 
 505

 
 
 
 
 
Receivables
 2,261
 624
 3,239
 
 6,124

 3,083
 1,757
 3,281
 
 8,121
Escrow proceeds receivable
 
 3,024
 
 
 3,024

 
 
 
 
 
Real estate inventories
 898,212
 620,678
 234,425
 
 1,753,315

 957,404
 662,342
 236,288
 
 1,856,034
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
 6,264
 150
 
 
 6,414

 8,264
 150
 
 
 8,414
Goodwill
 14,209
 52,693
 
 
 66,902

 14,209
 52,693
 
 
 66,902
Intangibles, net
 
 6,700
 
 
 6,700

 
 6,700
 
 
 6,700
Deferred income taxes, net
 79,631
 
 
 
 79,631

 79,728
 
 
 
 79,728
Other assets, net
 18,610
 1,708
 304
 
 20,622

 15,804
 1,197
 320
 
 17,321
Investments in subsidiaries641,531
 (25,858) (597,916) 
 (17,757) 
671,670
 (25,323) (608,347) 
 (38,000) 
Intercompany receivables
 
 241,527
 
 (241,527) 

 
 248,639
 
 (248,639) 
Total assets$641,531
 $1,024,012
 $329,382
 $243,394
 $(259,284) $1,979,035
$671,670
 $1,088,872
 $365,659
 $244,368
 $(286,639) $2,083,930
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY                      
Accounts payable$
 $54,077
 $21,037
 $3,740
 $
 $78,854
$
 $54,287
 $16,343
 $6,291
 $
 $76,921
Accrued expenses
 67,200
 4,265
 111
 
 71,576

 75,808
 6,098
 106
 
 82,012
Notes payable
 62,201
 
 123,616
 
 185,817

 133,126
 2,979
 123,237
 
 259,342
Subordinated amortizing notes
 12,390
 
 
 
 12,390

 8,970
 
 
 
 8,970
5 3/4% Senior Notes

 148,429
 
 
 
 148,429

 148,691
 
 
 
 148,691
8 1/2% Senior Notes

 422,887
 
 
 
 422,887

 422,852
 
 
 
 422,852
7% Senior Notes
 345,474
 
 
 
 345,474

 345,829
 
 
 
 345,829
Intercompany payables
 171,819
 
 69,708
 (241,527) 

 176,227
 
 72,412
 (248,639) 
Total liabilities
 1,284,477
 25,302
 197,175
 (241,527) 1,265,427

 1,365,790
 25,420
 202,046
 (248,639) 1,344,617
Equity                      
William Lyon Homes stockholders’ equity (deficit)641,531
 (260,465) 304,080
 (25,858) (17,757) 641,531
671,670
 (276,917) 340,240
 (25,323) (38,000) 671,670
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 72,077
 
 72,077

 (1) 
 67,644
 
 67,643
Total liabilities and equity$641,531
 $1,024,012
 $329,382
 $243,394
 $(259,284) $1,979,035
$671,670
 $1,088,872
 $365,660
 $244,367
 $(286,639) $2,083,930



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
 
 Unconsolidated    
 Delaware
Lyon
 California
Lyon
 Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 Eliminating
Entries
 Consolidated
Company
ASSETS           
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $44,332
 $2,723
 $3,148
 $
 $50,203
Restricted cash
 504
 
 
 
 504
Receivables
 8,986
 937
 4,915
 
 14,838
Escrow proceeds receivable
 2,020
 1,021
 
 
 3,041
Real estate inventories
 922,990
 589,762
 162,354
 
 1,675,106
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
 5,263
 150
 
 
 5,413
Goodwill
 14,209
 52,693
 
 
 66,902
Intangibles, net
 
 6,700
 
 
 6,700
Deferred income taxes, net
 79,726
 
 
 
 79,726
Other assets, net
 18,980
 1,738
 299
 
 21,017
Investments in subsidiaries632,095
 (34,522) (561,546) 
 (36,027) 
Intercompany receivables
 
 239,248
 
 (239,248) 
Total assets$632,095
 $1,062,488
 $333,426
 $170,716
 $(275,275) $1,923,450
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY           
Accounts payable$
 $45,065
 $27,807
 $3,009
 $
 $75,881
Accrued expenses
 62,167
 8,059
 98
 
 70,324
Notes payable
 80,915
 
 94,266
 
 175,181
Subordinated amortizing notes
 14,066
 
 
 
 14,066
5 3/4% Senior Notes

 148,295
 
 
 
 148,295
1/2% Senior Notes

 422,896
 
 
 
 422,896
7% Senior Notes
 345,338
 
 
 
 345,338
Intercompany payables
 170,757
 
 68,491
 (239,248) 
Total liabilities
 1,289,499
 35,866
 165,864
 (239,248) 1,251,981
Equity
 
 
 
 
 
William Lyon Homes stockholders’ equity (deficit)632,095
 (227,011) 297,560
 (34,522) (36,027) 632,095
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 39,374
 
 39,374
Total liabilities and equity$632,095
 $1,062,488
 $333,426
 $170,716
 $(275,275) $1,923,450



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2016
(in thousands)
 
Unconsolidated    Unconsolidated    
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Operating revenue                      
Sales$
 $100,824
 $137,800
 $22,671
 $
 $261,295
$
 $105,962
 $181,594
 $55,072
 $
 $342,628
Construction services
 3,130
 
 
 
 3,130

 86
 
 
 
 86
Management fees
 (680) 
 
 680
 

 (1,541) 
 
 1,541
 

 103,274
 137,800
 22,671
 680
 264,425

 104,507
 181,594
 55,072
 1,541
 342,714
Operating costs                      
Cost of sales
 (78,879) (115,560) (20,052) (680) (215,171)
 (84,652) (151,306) (48,397) (1,541) (285,896)
Construction services
 (2,824) 
 
 
 (2,824)
 (86) 
 
 
 (86)
Sales and marketing
 (5,950) (7,625) (1,418) 
 (14,993)
 (6,205) (9,774) (2,267) 
 (18,246)
General and administrative
 (14,006) (3,828) 
 
 (17,834)
 (14,268) (3,091) (1) 
 (17,360)
Other
 (369) 46
 
 
 (323)
 140
 69
 (11) 
 198

 (102,028) (126,967) (21,470) (680) (251,145)
 (105,071) (164,102) (50,676) (1,541) (321,390)
Income from subsidiaries9,014
 2,237
 
 
 (11,251) 
13,069
 3,548
 
 
 (16,617) 
Operating income9,014
 3,483
 10,833
 1,201
 (11,251) 13,280
13,069
 2,984
 17,492
 4,396
 (16,617) 21,324
Equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures
 1,002
 179
 
 
 1,181

 1,140
 295
 
 
 1,435
Other income (expense), net
 773
 (9) (239) 
 525

 2,550
 (19) (481) 
 2,050
Income before provision for income taxes9,014
 5,258
 11,003
 962
 (11,251) 14,986
13,069
 6,674
 17,768
 3,915
 (16,617) 24,809
Provision for income taxes
 (5,045) 
 
 
 (5,045)
 (8,295) 
 
 
 (8,295)
Net income9,014
 213
 11,003
 962
 (11,251) 9,941
13,069
 (1,621) 17,768
 3,915
 (16,617) 16,514
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (927) 
 (927)
 
 
 (3,445) 
 (3,445)
Net income available to common stockholders$9,014
 $213
 $11,003
 $35
 $(11,251) $9,014
$13,069
 $(1,621) $17,768
 $470
 $(16,617) $13,069



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2015
(in thousands)
 
Unconsolidated    Unconsolidated    
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Operating revenue                      
Sales$
 $89,544
 $83,134
 $17,037
 $
 $189,715
$
 $90,594
 $149,122
 $4,595
 $
 $244,311
Construction services
 7,453
 
 
 
 7,453

 4,896
 
 
 
 4,896
Management fees
 (511) 
 
 511
 

 (138) 
 
 138
 

 96,486
 83,134
 17,037
 511
 197,168

 95,352
 149,122
 4,595
 138
 249,207
Operating costs                      
Cost of sales
 (68,876) (70,384) (14,310) (511) (154,081)
 (71,488) (124,476) (4,226) (138) (200,328)
Construction services
 (6,029) 
 
 
 (6,029)
 (4,146) 
 
 
 (4,146)
Sales and marketing
 (5,754) (5,524) (946) 
 (12,224)
 (6,312) (8,244) (796) 
 (15,352)
General and administrative
 (11,319) (2,629) 
 
 (13,948)
 (11,515) (2,466) 
 
 (13,981)
Amortization of intangible assets
 (203) 
 
 
 (203)
 (45) 
 
 
 (45)
Other
 (1,136) 600
 
 
 (536)
 (889) 297
 
 
 (592)

 (93,317) (77,937) (15,256) (511) (187,021)
 (94,395) (134,889) (5,022) (138) (234,444)
Income from subsidiaries6,682
 (6,744) 
 
 62
 
12,082
 623
 
 
 (12,705) 
Operating income (loss)6,682
 (3,575) 5,197
 1,781
 62
 10,147
12,082
 1,580
 14,233
 (427) (12,705) 14,763
Equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures
 
 248
 
 
 248

 1,018
 
 
 
 1,018
Other income (expense), net
 4,366
 4,813
 (8,398) 
 781

 1,395
 368
 (311) 
 1,452
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes6,682
 791
 10,258
 (6,617) 62
 11,176
12,082
 3,993
 14,601
 (738) (12,705) 17,233
Provision for income taxes
 (3,570) 
 
 
 (3,570)
 (4,956) 
 
 
 (4,956)
Net income (loss)6,682
 (2,779) 10,258
 (6,617) 62
 7,606
12,082
 (963) 14,601
 (738) (12,705) 12,277
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (924) 
 (924)
 
 
 (195) 
 (195)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$6,682
 $(2,779) $10,258
 $(7,541) $62
 $6,682
$12,082
 $(963) $14,601
 $(933) $(12,705) $12,082




















CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(in thousands)
 Unconsolidated    
 
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Operating revenue           
Sales$
 $344,459
 $494,597
 $89,926
 $
 $928,982
Construction services
 3,810
 
 
 
 3,810
Management fees
 (2,587) 
 
 2,587
 
 
 345,682
 494,597
 89,926
 2,587
 932,792
Operating costs           
Cost of sales
 (276,481) (411,339) (79,298) (2,587) (769,705)
Construction services
 (3,458) 
 
 
 (3,458)
Sales and marketing
 (18,080) (26,731) (6,540) 
 (51,351)
General and administrative
 (41,749) (10,129) (1) 
 (51,879)
Other
 (587) (14) (11) 
 (612)
 
 (340,355) (448,213) (85,850) (2,587) (877,005)
Income from subsidiaries36,644
 7,472
 
 
 (44,116) 
Operating income (loss)36,644
 12,799
 46,384
 4,076
 (44,116) 55,787
Equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures
 3,001
 809
 
 
 3,810
Other income (expense), net
 3,873
 (34) (1,036) 
 2,803
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes36,644
 19,673
 47,159
 3,040
 (44,116) 62,400
Provision for income taxes
 (20,859) 
 
 
 (20,859)
Net income (loss)36,644
 (1,186) 47,159
 3,040
 (44,116) 41,541
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (4,897) 
 (4,897)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$36,644
 $(1,186) $47,159
 $(1,857) $(44,116) $36,644






















CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(in thousands)
 Unconsolidated    
 
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Operating revenue           
Sales$
 $285,136
 $368,519
 $28,111
 $
 $681,766
Construction services
 19,304
 
 
 
 19,304
Management fees
 (844) 
 
 844
 
 
 303,596
 368,519
 28,111
 844
 701,070
Operating costs           
Cost of sales
 (220,846) (309,076) (23,891) (844) (554,657)
Construction services
 (16,073) 
 
 
 (16,073)
Sales and marketing
 (18,478) (21,544) (2,458) 
 (42,480)
General and administrative
 (33,503) (7,841) 
   (41,344)
Amortization of intangible assets
 (710) 
 
 
 (710)
Other
 (2,671) 1,122
 
 
 (1,549)
 
 (292,281) (337,339) (26,349) (844) (656,813)
Income from subsidiaries31,041
 (5,845) 
 
 (25,196) 
Operating income (loss)31,041
 5,470
 31,180
 1,762
 (25,196) 44,257
Equity in income from unconsolidated joint ventures
 1,781
 
 
 
 1,781
Other income (expense), net
 6,083
 5,685
 (8,893) 
 2,875
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes31,041
 13,334
 36,865
 (7,131) (25,196) 48,913
Provision for income taxes
 (15,780) 
 
 
 (15,780)
Net income (loss)31,041
 (2,446) 36,865
 (7,131) (25,196) 33,133
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 (2,092) 
 (2,092)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders$31,041
 $(2,446) $36,865
 $(9,223) $(25,196) $31,041





















CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
ThreeNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2016
(in thousands)
 
Unconsolidated    Unconsolidated    
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Operating activities                      
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(422) $41,317
 $(32,162) $(68,691) $422
 $(59,536)$(2,931) $18,174
 $(35,182) $(65,970) $2,931
 $(82,978)
Investing activities                      
Collection of related party note receivable
 6,188
 
 
 
 6,188

 6,188
 
 
 
 6,188
Purchases of property and equipment
 (548) 25
 (3) 
 (526)
 (809) 56
 (20) 
 (773)
Investments in subsidiaries
 (6,427) 36,370
 
 (29,943) 

 (1,727) 46,801
 
 (45,074) 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

(787)
36,395

(3)
(29,943)
5,662


3,652

46,857

(20)
(45,074)
5,415
Financing activities                      
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable
 57
 
 53,105
 
 53,162

 2,211
 
 109,781
 
 111,992
Principal payments on notes payable
 (2,771) 
 (23,755) 
 (26,526)
 (10,440) 
 (80,810) 
 (91,250)
Proceeds from borrowings on Revolver
 55,000
 
 
 
 55,000

 198,000
 
 
 
 198,000
Payments on Revolver
 (71,000) 
 
 
 (71,000)
 (167,000) 
 
 
 (167,000)
Principal payments on subordinated amortizing notes
 (1,676) 
 
 
 (1,676)
 (5,096) 
 
 
 (5,096)
Payment of deferred loan costs
 (197) 
 
 
 (197)
 (792) 
 
 
 (792)
Shares remitted to or withheld by Company for employee tax withholding
 (844) 
 
 
 (844)
Purchase of common stock
 (918) 
 
 
 (918)
Excess income tax benefit from stock based awards
 (226) 
 
 
 (226)
 (238) 
 
 
 (238)
Noncontrolling interest contributions
 
 
 33,241
 
 33,241

 
 
 36,140
 
 36,140
Noncontrolling interest distributions
 
 
 (1,465) 
 (1,465)
 
 
 (12,768) 
 (12,768)
Advances to affiliates
 
 (4,483) 8,629
 (4,146) 

 
 (4,479) 11,056
 (6,577) 
Intercompany receivables/payables422
 (33,027) (2,279) 1,217
 33,667
 
2,931
 (46,182) (9,391) 3,922
 48,720
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities422
 (54,684) (6,762) 70,972
 29,521
 39,469
2,931
 (30,455) (13,870) 67,321
 42,143
 68,070
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
 (14,154) (2,529) 2,278
 
 (14,405)

(8,629)
(2,195)
1,331


 (9,493)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 44,332
 2,723
 3,148
 
 50,203

 44,332
 2,723
 3,148
 
 50,203
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $30,178
 $194
 $5,426
 $
 $35,798
$
 $35,703
 $528
 $4,479
 $
 $40,710



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
ThreeNine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2015
(in thousands)
 
Unconsolidated    Unconsolidated    
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Delaware
Lyon
 
California
Lyon
 
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
 
Eliminating
Entries
 
Consolidated
Company
Operating activities                      
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities$175
 $(53,883) $(6,375) $(838) $(175) $(61,096)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(3,108) $(148,129) $(19,212) $(52,390) $2,485
 $(220,354)
Investing activities                      
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures
 (1,000) 
 
 
 (1,000)
 (1,000) 
 
 
 (1,000)
Purchases of property and equipment
 (173) 15
 8
 
 (150)
 (1,375) 65
 22
 
 (1,288)
Investments in subsidiaries
 (4,896) 11,916
 
 (7,020) 

 (6,572) 27,885
 
 (21,313) 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 (6,069) 11,931
 8
 (7,020) (1,150)
 (8,947) 27,950
 22
 (21,313) (2,288)
Financing activities                      
Proceeds from borrowings on notes payable
 
 
 6,148
 
 6,148

 30,415
 
 54,511
 
 84,926
Principal payments on notes payable
 (384) (162) (6,416) 
 (6,962)
 (8,725) (162) (12,236) 
 (21,123)
Proceeds from issuance of 7% notes
 51,000
 
 
 
 51,000
Proceeds from borrowings on Revolver
 89,000
 
 
 
 89,000

 194,000
 
 
 
 194,000
Payments on revolver
 (40,000) 
 
 
 (40,000)
 (109,000) 
 
 
 (109,000)
Principal payments on subordinated amortizing notes
 (1,760) 
 
 
 (1,760)
 (4,999) 
 
 
 (4,999)
Payment of deferred loan costs
 (561) 
 
 
 (561)
 (1,755) 
 
 
 (1,755)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
 106
 
 
 
 106

 106
 
 
 
 106
Shares remitted to Company for employee tax witholding
 (1,632) 
 
 
 (1,632)
 (1,826) 
 
 
 (1,826)
Noncontrolling interest contributions
 
 
 13,125
 
 13,125
Noncontrolling interest distributions
 
 
 (5,414) 
 (5,414)
 
 
 (8,204) 
 (8,204)
Advances to affiliates
 
 (4,808) 5,693
 (885) 

 
 (4,810) 9,327
 (4,517) 
Intercompany receivables/payables(175) (6,620) (779) (506) 8,080
 
3,108
 (21,706) (3,412) (1,335) 23,345
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(175) 38,149
 (5,749) (495) 7,195
 38,925
3,108
 127,510
 (8,384) 55,188
 18,828
 196,250
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 (21,803) (193) (1,325) 
 (23,321)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
 (29,566) 354
 2,820
 
 (26,392)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 48,462
 573
 3,736
 
 52,771

 48,462
 573
 3,736
 
 52,771
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $26,659
 $380
 $2,411
 $
 $29,450
$
 $18,896
 $927
 $6,556
 $
 $26,379


Note 7—Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (“ASC 820”), the Company is required to disclose the estimated fair value of financial instruments. As of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate:

Notes payable—The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value of the notes payable because market rates are unchanged since inception and/or the outstanding balance at quarter end is expected to be repaid within one year.

Subordinated amortizing notes—The Subordinated amortizing notes are traded over the counter and their fair values were based upon quotes from industry sources.

    5 3/4% Senior Notes due April 15, 2019 —The 5 3/4% Senior Notes are traded over the counter and their fair values were based upon quotes from industry sources.

8 1/2% Senior Notes due November 15, 2020 —The 8 1/2% Senior Notes are traded over the counter and their fair values were based upon quotes from industry sources.

7% Senior Notes due August 15, 2022 —The 7% Senior Notes are traded over the counter and their fair values were based upon quotes from industry sources.

The following table excludes cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables and accounts payable, which had fair values approximating their carrying amounts due to the short maturities and liquidity of these instruments. The estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Financial liabilities:              
Notes payable$185,817
 $185,817
 $175,181
 $175,181
$259,342
 $259,342
 $175,181
 $175,181
Subordinated amortizing notes$12,390
 $9,514
 $14,066
 $12,122
$8,970
 $8,432
 $14,066
 $12,122
5 3/4% Senior Notes due 2019
$148,429
 $143,250
 $148,295
 $147,750
$148,691
 $153,375
 $148,295
 $147,750
8 1/2% Senior Notes due 2020
$422,887
 $434,563
 $422,896
 $449,438
$422,852
 $445,188
 $422,896
 $449,438
7% Senior Notes due 2022$345,474
 $334,250
 $345,338
 $350,875
$345,829
 $360,500
 $345,338
 $350,875
ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value, expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable market inputs, minimize the use of unobservable market inputs and disclose in the form of an outlined hierarchy the details of such fair value measurements. The Company used Level 3 to measure the fair value of its Notes payable, and Level 2 to measure the fair value of its Senior notes and Subordinated amortizing notes. ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to a fair value measurement are considered to be observable or unobservable in a marketplace. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1—quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
Level 2—quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3—valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.





Note 8—Related Party Transactions

On September 3, 2009, Presley CMR, Inc., a California corporation (“Presley CMR”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of California Lyon, entered into an Aircraft Purchase and Sale Agreement (“PSA”) with an affiliate of General William Lyon to sell an aircraft (the “Aircraft”). The PSA provided for an aggregate purchase price for the Aircraft of $8.3 million, (which value was the appraised fair market value of the Aircraft), which consisted of: (i) cash in the amount of $2.1 million to be paid at closing and (ii) a promissory note from the affiliate in the amount of $6.2 million. The note was secured by the Aircraft and required semiannual interest payments to California Lyon of approximately $0.1 million. The note provided for a maturity date in September 2016. During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the promissory note was paid in full by the borrower prior to the September 2016 maturity date, along with all accrued interest to date.

In August 2016 the Company acquired certain lots within a master planned community located in Aurora, Colorado, for an overall purchase price of approximately $9.3 million, from an entity managed by an affiliate of Paulson & Co., Inc. (“Paulson”). WLH Recovery Acquisition LLC, which is affiliated with, and managed by affiliates of, Paulson, holds over 5% of Parent’s outstanding Class A common stock. A portion of the acquisition price for the lots was paid in the form of a seller note with a principal amount of approximately $3.0 million (see Note 6). The Company believes that the transaction, including the terms of the seller note, was on terms no less favorable than it would have agreed to with unrelated parties.

Note 9—Income Taxes
Since inception, the Company has operated solely within the United States. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 33.7%33.4% and 31.9%33.4%, and 28.8% and 32.3% for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The significant drivers of the effective tax rate are allocation of income to noncontrolling interests, change in the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, and the domestic production activities deduction.
Management assesses its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable under ASC 740. The Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for any portion of the asset that management concludes is more likely than not to be unrealizable. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company's assessment considers all evidence, both positive and negative, including the nature, frequency and severity of any current and cumulative losses, taxable income in carry back years, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. At March 31,September 30, 2016 the Company’s had no amounts recorded as a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.
At March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company had no remaining federal net operating loss carryforwards and $54.2$54.7 million of remaining state net operating loss carryforwards. State net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2031 and 2016, respectively.2031. In addition, as of March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company had unused federal and state built-in losses of $53.2 million and $7.5 million, respectively. The five year testing period for built-in losses expires in 2017 and the unused built-in loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2032. The Company had AMT credit carryovers of $1.4 million at March 31,September 30, 2016, which have an indefinite life.
FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement criterion for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be considered more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company records interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of the provision for income taxes. The Company has no unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for calendar tax years ended 2012 through 2015 and forward. The Company is subject to various state income tax examinations for calendar tax years ended 2008 through 2015 and forward. The Company does not have any tax examinations currently in progress.








Note 10—Income Per Common Share
Basic and diluted income per common share for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015 were calculated as follows (in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts):
 


Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 March 31, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 March 31, 
 2015
Three 
 Months 
 Ended  
 September 30, 
 2016
 Three 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2016
 Nine 
 Months 
 Ended 
 September 30, 
 2015
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding36,651,846
 36,463,995
36,801,464
 36,573,099
 36,746,727
 36,534,554
Effect of dilutive securities:          
Stock options, unvested common shares, and warrants757,085
 1,169,836
636,633
 1,465,119
 672,364
 1,396,633
Tangible equity units894,930
 
894,930
 469,049
 894,930
 469,049
Diluted average shares outstanding38,303,861
 37,633,831
38,333,027
 38,507,267
 38,314,021
 38,400,236
Net income available to common stockholders$9,014
 $6,682
$13,069
 $12,082
 $36,644
 $31,041
Basic income per common share$0.25
 $0.18
$0.36
 $0.33
 $1.00
 $0.85
Dilutive income per common share$0.24
 $0.18
$0.34
 $0.31
 $0.96
 $0.81
Antidilutive securities not included in the calculation of diluted income per common share (weighted average):          
Unvested stock options240,000
 
240,000
 240,000
 240,000
 160,000
Warrants1,907,551
 
1,907,551
 
 1,907,551
 
Tangible equity units
 894,930

Note 11—Stock Based Compensation
We account for share-based awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which requires the fair value of stock-based compensation awards to be amortized as an expense over the vesting period. Stock-based compensation awards are valued at the fair value on the date of grant. Compensation expense for awards with performance based conditions is recognized over the vesting period once achievement of the performance condition is deemed probable.
During the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company granted 259,79731,571 and 291,368 shares of restricted stock, andrespectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted 566,092 shares of performance based restricted stock. On the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statement of Equity, the Company considers unvested shares of restricted stock to be issued, but not outstanding.
The Company recorded total stock based compensation expense during the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015 of $1.5 million and $1.4$4.1 million, and $1.6 million and $4.8 million, respectively.


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards

With respect to the performance based restricted stock awards granted to certain employees during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the actual number of such shares of restricted stock that will be earned (the “Earned Shares”) is subject to the Company’s achievement of pre-established performance targets as of the end of the 2016 fiscal year. For each of the aforementioned awards, one-third of the Earned Shares will vest on March 1st of each of 2017, 2018 and 2019, subject to each grantee’s continued service through each vesting date. Based on the probability assessment as of March 31,September 30, 2016, management determined that the currently available data was not sufficient to support that the achievement of the minimum threshold for one of the performance targets is probable, and as such, no compensation expense of $0.3 million has been recognized for these awards to date.

Restricted Stock Awards
With respect to the restricted stock awards granted to certain employees during the three and threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, representing 218,733250,304 shares of restricted stock, 163,269 of such shares are subject to a vesting schedule pursuant to which one-third of the shares will vest on March 1st of each of 2017, 2018 and 2019, and 55,464 of such shares are subject to a vesting schedule pursuant to which one-half of the shares will vest on March 1st of each of 2017 and 2018.2018, 3,548 of such shares have a vesting schedule pursuant to which one-half of the shares will vest on August 9th of each of 2017 and 2018, 20,697 of such shares are subject to a vesting schedule pursuant to which 100% of the shares will vest on August 9, 2018, and 7,326 of such shares have a vesting schedule pursuant to which one-half of the shares will vest on September 6th of each of 2017 and 2018, in each case subject to each grantee’s continued service through each vesting date. With respect to the restricted stock awards granted to certain non-employee directors of the Company during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, representing 41,064 shares of restricted stock, the awards vest in equal quarterly installments on each of June 1, 2016,


September 1, 2016, December 1, 2016 and March 1, 2017, subject to each grantee’s continued service on the board through each vesting date.


Note 12—Commitments and Contingencies
The Company’s commitments and contingent liabilities include the usual obligations incurred by real estate developers in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits related to its normal business activities. We believe that the accruals we have recorded for probable and reasonably estimable losses with respect to these proceedings are adequate and that, as of March 31,September 30, 2016, it was not reasonably possible that an additional material loss had been incurred in an amount in excess of the estimated amounts already recognized on our condensed consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our accruals for litigation and regulatory proceedings, and as appropriate, adjust them to reflect (i) the facts and circumstances known to us at the time, including information regarding negotiations, settlements, rulings and other relevant events and developments; (ii) the advice and analyses of counsel; and (iii) the assumptions and judgment of management. Similar factors and considerations are used in establishing new accruals for proceedings as to which losses have become probable and reasonably estimable at the time an evaluation is made. The outcome of any of these proceedings, including the defense and other litigation-related costs and expenses we may incur, however, is inherently uncertain and could differ significantly from the estimate reflected in a related accrual, if made. Therefore, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of any proceeding, if in excess of a related accrual or if no accrual had been made, could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
We have non-cancelable operating leases primarily associated with our office facilities. Rent expense under cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases totaled $1.0 million and $1.0$2.9 million, and $1.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations for the respective periods. The table below shows the future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases at March 31,September 30, 2016 (in thousands).
 
Year Ending December 31 
Year Ending December 31, 
2016$1,826
$569
20172,282
2,516
20182,274
2,475
20192,054
2,226
20201,832
2,008
Thereafter2,603
2,785
Total$12,871
$12,579
As of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had $0.5$0.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in deposits as collateral for outstanding surety bonds to guarantee the Company’s financial obligations under certain contractual arrangements in the normal course of business. The standby letters of credit were secured by cash as reflected as restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Company also had outstanding performance and surety bonds of $166.2$195.9 million at March 31,September 30, 2016, related principally to its obligations for site improvements at various projects. The Company does not believe that draws upon these bonds, if any, will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company had $259.1$238.5 million of project commitments relating to the construction of projects.
See Note 6 for additional information relating to the Company’s guarantee arrangements.
The Company has entered into various purchase option agreements with third parties to acquire land. As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company has made non-refundable deposits of $69.4$55.6 million. The Company is under no obligation to purchase the land, but would forfeit remaining deposits if the land were not purchased. The total remaining purchase price under the option agreements is $479.9$447.3 million as of March 31,September 30, 2016.





Note 13—Subsequent Events

No events have occurred subsequent to March 31,September 30, 2016, that would require recognition or disclosure in the Company’s financial statements.


Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
WILLIAM LYON HOMES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company is one of the largest Western U.S. regional homebuilders. Headquartered in Newport Beach, California, the Company is primarily engaged in the design, construction, marketing and sale of single-family detached and attached homes in California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington. The Company’s core markets include Orange County, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire, the San Francisco Bay Area, Phoenix, Las Vegas, Denver, Portland, and Seattle. The Company has a distinguished legacy of more than 60 years of homebuilding operations, over which time it has sold in excess of 96,00097,000 homes. For the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 (the "2016 period"), the Company had revenues from homes sales of $261.3$929.0 million, a 38%36% increase from $189.7$681.8 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2015 (the "2015 period"), which includes results from all reportable operating segments. The Company had net new home orders of 6892,211 homes in the 2016 period, a 17%7% increase from 5882,059 in the 2015 period, while the average sales price ("ASP") for homes closed decreased 2%increased 9% to $481,200$494,400 in the 2016 period from $489,000$453,000 in the 2015 period.
The following discussion of results of operations and financial condition contains forward-looking statements reflecting current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. See the section titled, “CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in such section.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP"), and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), and are presented on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will be able to operate in the ordinary course of its business and realize its assets and discharge its liabilities for the foreseeable future.
Results of Operations
In the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company delivered 5431,879 homes, with an ASP of approximately $481,200,$494,400, and recognized home sales revenue of $261.3$929.0 million. The Company generated net income to common shareholders of $9.0$36.6 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, and earnings per share of $0.24,$0.96, on a diluted basis. The Company continues to see positive trends in price appreciation at most of its projects over the course of the year, and our average sales price of homes in backlog is approximately $533,000$551,900 as of March 31,September 30, 2016, which is 11%12% higher than the average sales price of homes closed for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 of $481,200.$494,400.
As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company was selling homes in 6776 communities, and our average community count for the threenine month period then ended was 6973 locations. We had a consolidated backlog of 8851,071 homes sold but not closed, with an associated sales value of $471.7$591.0 million, representing a 31%4% increase in units, and a 41%10% increase in dollar value, as compared to the backlog at March 31,September 30, 2015.
Homebuilding gross margin percentage and adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage was 17.7%17.1% and 24.7%23.5%, respectively, for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, as compared to 18.8%18.6% and 24.6%25.1%, respectively, for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2015.
Comparisons of the Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2016 to March 31,September 30, 2015
Revenues from homes sales increased 38%40% to $261.3$342.6 million during the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, compared to $189.7$244.3 million during the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2015. The increase is primarily due to the opening of new communities across our reporting segments.segments, which contributes to a higher number of deliveries, as well as an 18% increase in average sales price. The number of net new home orders for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 increased 17%4% to 689651 homes from 588628 homes for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2015. 


Three Months Ended March 31, Increase (Decrease)Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
Number of Net New Home Orders              
California162
 184
 (22) (12)%191
 158
 33
 21 %
Arizona108
 44
 64
 145 %117
 119
 (2) (2)%
Nevada66
 46
 20
 43 %66
 77
 (11) (14)%
Colorado78
 85
 (7) (8)%54
 38
 16
 42 %
Washington84
 114
 (30) (26)%66
 98
 (32) (33)%
Oregon191
 115
 76
 66 %157
 138
 19
 14 %
Total689
 588
 101
 17 %651
 628
 23
 4 %
Cancellation Rate14% 17% (3)% 

The 17%4% increase in net new homes orders is driven by a 28%7% increase in average number of sales locations to 6978 average locations in 2016, compared to 5473 in the 2015 period, driven by the opening of new communities in Oregon,California, Arizona, Nevada and Washington. This increase was partiallyOregon, offset by a shiftslight decline in product mix in the California and Colorado reporting segmentsmonthly absorption to homes with higher ASPs, which generally sell at a slower pace. In addition, the Company's absorption decreased slightly for the three months ended March 31, 2016 to 3.32.8 sales per month per project from 3.6 in the 2015 period. 2.9.
 Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 %
Cancellation Rates     
California24% 23% 1 %
Arizona16% 16%  %
Nevada15% 21% (6)%
Colorado16% 28% (12)%
Washington21% 24% (3)%
Oregon22% 27% (5)%
Overall20% 23% (3)%
Cancellation rates during the 2016 period decreased to 14%20% from 17%23% during the 2015 period.

Cancellation rates typically are driven by personal factors affecting buyers and may not be indicative of any overarching trends affecting regions.
Three Months Ended March 31, Increase (Decrease)Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
Average Number of Sales Locations              
California18
 17
 1
 6 %23
 18
 5
 28 %
Arizona8
 5
 3
 60 %9
 8
 1
 13 %
Nevada12
 9
 3
 33 %12
 11
 1
 9 %
Colorado10
 13
 (3) (23)%10
 14
 (4) (29)%
Washington6
 5
 1
 20 %6
 6
 
  %
Oregon15
 5
 10
 200 %18
 16
 2
 13 %
Total69
 54
 15
 28 %78
 73
 5
 7 %

The average number of sales locations for the Company increased to 6978 locations for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 compared to 5473 for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2015, driven by the opening of new communities in Oregon,California, Arizona, Nevada and WashingtonOregon during 2016, as the Company continues to convert its land supply into home sites. During the period, the Company opened 5 communities, while closing out 8.


 Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Quarterly Absorption Rates     
California8.3 8.8 (0.5)
Arizona13.0 14.9 (1.9)
Nevada5.5 7.0 (1.5)
Colorado5.4 2.7 2.7
Washington11.0 16.3 (5.3)
Oregon8.7 8.6 0.1
Overall8.3 8.6 (0.3)
The Company's consolidated quarterly absorption rate, representing number of net new home orders divided by average sales locations for the period, decreased slightly for the three months ended September 30, 2016 to 8.3 sales per project from 8.6 in the 2015 period. Absorption rates declined in Washington from 11.0 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 16.3 for the three months ended September 30, 2015; however, Washington continues to represent the second highest absorption rate across all reporting segments during the 2016 period.
 
March 31, Increase (Decrease)September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
Backlog (units)              
California214
 207
 7
 3 %327
 297
 30
 10 %
Arizona235
 66
 169
 256 %252
 238
 14
 6 %
Nevada119
 85
 34
 40 %124
 109
 15
 14 %
Colorado103
 128
 (25) (20)%112
 134
 (22) (16)%
Washington60
 100
 (40) (40)%57
 90
 (33) (37)%
Oregon154
 92
 62
 67 %199
 164
 35
 21 %
Total885
 678
 207
 31 %1,071
 1,032
 39
 4 %
The Company’s backlog at March 31,September 30, 2016 increased 31%4% to 8851,071 units from 6781,032 units at March 31,September 30, 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in net new home orders to 651 in the Arizona, Oregon and Nevada reporting segments, which added 169, 62 and 34 units, respectively overcurrent period from 628 in the 2015 period. These increases were partiallyprior year offset by Washington and Colorado, which experienced a decreasehigher backlog conversion rate of 4062% in current period compared to 58% in the prior period.


and 25 units, respectively, from the 2015 period. The California reporting segment reported backlog levels that were fairly consistent between periods.
March 31, Increase (Decrease)September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
(dollars in thousands)(dollars in thousands)
Backlog (dollars)              
California$166,193
 $124,341
 $41,852
 34 %$260,082
 $236,202
 $23,880
 10 %
Arizona62,169
 18,147
 44,022
 243 %71,609
 59,737
 11,872
 20 %
Nevada86,863
 56,715
 30,148
 53 %78,285
 70,601
 7,684
 11 %
Colorado53,011
 57,237
 (4,226) (7)%59,451
 64,300
 (4,849) (8)%
Washington35,492
 44,128
 (8,636) (20)%36,518
 36,902
 (384) (1)%
Oregon67,969
 34,500
 33,469
 97 %85,093
 69,383
 15,710
 23 %
Total$471,697
 $335,068
 $136,629
 41 %$591,038
 $537,125
 $53,913
 10 %
The dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed as of March 31,September 30, 2016 was $471.7591.0 million, up 41%10% from $335.1537.1 million as of March 31,September 30, 2015. The increase primarily reflects an increase in net new orders as described above, coupled with an 8%a 6% increase in the ASP of homes in backlog when compared with the prior period. The increase in the dollar amount of backlog of homes sold but not closed as described above generally results in an increase in operating revenues in the subsequent period as compared to the previous period.


In California, the dollar amount of backlog increased 34%10% to $166.2$260.1 million as of March 31,September 30, 2016 from $124.3$236.2 million as of March 31,September 30, 2015, which is attributable to a 29%10% increase in units in backlog.
In Arizona, the dollar amount of backlog increased 20% to $71.6 million as of September 30, 2016 from $59.7 million as of September 30, 2015, which is attributable to a 6% increase in the number of homes in backlog, to 252 at September 30, 2016, from 238 at September 30, 2015.
In Nevada, the dollar amount of backlog increased 11% to $78.3 million as of September 30, 2016 from $70.6 million as of September 30, 2015, attributable to a 14% increase in units in backlog, to 124 as of September 30, 2016 from 109 as of September 30, 2015, partially offset by a 3% decrease in average sales price of homes in backlog to $631,300 as of September 30, 2016, from $647,700 as of September 30, 2015.
In Colorado, the dollar amount of backlog decreased 8% to $59.5 million as of September 30, 2016 from $64.3 million as of September 30, 2015, which is attributable to a 16% decrease in the number of units in backlog, to 112 units as of September 30, 2016, from 134 units as of September 30, 2015, partially offset by a 11% increase of the ASP of homes in backlog to $530,800 as of September 30, 2016 from $479,900 as of September 30, 2015.
In Washington, the dollar amount of backlog decreased 1% to $36.5 million as of September 30, 2016 from $36.9 million as of September 30, 2015, which is attributable to a 37% decrease in the number of units in backlog, to 57 units as of September 30, 2016, from 90 units as of September 30, 2015. This decrease is mostly offset by a 56% increase in the ASP of homes in backlog to $776,600 in the$640,700 as of September 30, 2016 period from $600,700 in the 2015 period. The increase in average sales price$410,000 as of homes in backlog reflects a greater number of homes in backlog with price points above $1.0 million dollars, to 36 in the 2016 period from 23 in the 2015 period. In California, the cancellation rate remained relatively consistent at 20% for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to 19% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.September 30, 2015.
In Arizona,Oregon, the dollar amount of backlog increased 243%23% to $62.2$85.1 million as of March 31,September 30, 2016 from $18.1$69.4 million as of March 31,September 30, 2015, which is primarily attributable to a 256%21% increase in the number of homes in backlog, to 235 at March 31, 2016, from 66 at March 31, 2015, driven by consistently higher absorption rates over the last several quarters. In the Arizona reporting segment, the cancellation rate decreased to 9% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 14% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
In Nevada, the dollar amount of backlog increased 53% to $86.9 million as of March 31, 2016 from $56.7 million as of March 31, 2015, attributable to a 40% increase in units in backlog, to 119 as of March 31, 2016 from 85 as of March 31, 2015, and a 9% increase in average sales price of homes in backlog to $729,900 as of March 31, 2016, from $667,200 as of March 31, 2015. The increase in average sales price of homes in backlog reflects a larger number of homes in backlog with price points above $1.0 million dollars, to 16 in the 2016 period from 13 in the 2015 period. In Nevada, the cancellation rate decreased to 20% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 22% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
In Colorado, the dollar amount of backlog decreased 7% to $53.0 million as of March 31, 2016 from $57.2 million as of March 31, 2015, which is attributable to a 20% decrease in the number of units in backlog, to 103199 units as of March 31,September 30, 2016, from 128164 units as of March 31,September 30, 2015, partially offset bycoupled with a 15% increase of the ASP of homes in backlog to $514,700 as of March 31, 2016 from $447,200 as of March 31, 2015. In Colorado, the cancellation rate increased to 11% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 9% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
In Washington, the dollar amount of backlog decreased 20% to $35.5 million as of March 31, 2016 from $44.1 million as of March 31, 2015, which is attributable to a 40% decrease in the number of units in backlog, to 60 units as of March 31, 2016, from 100 units as of March 31, 2015. This decrease is partially offset by a 34%1% increase in the ASP of homes in backlog to $591,500 as of March 31, 2016 from $441,300 as of March 31, 2015. In Washington, the cancellation rate decreased to 10% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 20% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
In Oregon, the dollar amount of backlog increased 97% to $68.0 million as of March 31, 2016 from $34.5 million as of March 31, 2015, which is primarily attributable to a 67% increase in the number of units in backlog, to 154 units as of March 31, 2016, from 92 units as of March 31, 2015, coupled with a 18% increase in the ASP of homes in backlog to $441,400$427,600 in the 2016 period from $375,000$423,100 in the 2015 period. In Oregon, the cancellation rate decreased to 10% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 19% for the three months ended March 31, 2015.


Three Months Ended March 31, Increase (Decrease)Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
Number of Homes Closed              
California142
 135
 7
 5 %169
 122
 47
 39 %
Arizona82
 25
 57
 228 %108
 69
 39
 57 %
Nevada62
 34
 28
 82 %85
 63
 22
 35 %
Colorado53
 41
 12
 29 %70
 50
 20
 40 %
Washington68
 76
 (8) (11)%74
 117
 (43) (37)%
Oregon136
 77
 59
 77 %167
 143
 24
 17 %
Total543
 388
 155
 40 %673
 564
 109
 19 %

During the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the number of homes closed increased 40%19% to 543673 from 388564 in the 2015 period. The increase was primarily attributable to the California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Oregon reporting segments, driven by a higher number of homes in backlog to begin the quarter when compared with the 2015 period, as well as moderateperiod. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the Colorado and CaliforniaWashington reporting segments.segment.
Three Months Ended March 31, Increase (Decrease)Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
(dollars in thousands)(dollars in thousands)
Home Sales Revenue              
California$92,754
 $79,340
 $13,414
 17%$111,434
 $63,265
 $48,169
 76 %
Arizona21,047
 7,186
 13,861
 193%28,758
 18,588
 10,170
 55 %
Nevada30,741
 27,242
 3,499
 13%49,600
 31,924
 17,676
 55 %
Colorado26,393
 18,189
 8,204
 45%35,316
 23,864
 11,452
 48 %
Washington32,901
 31,280
 1,621
 5%42,247
 46,905
 (4,658) (10)%
Oregon57,459
 26,478
 30,981
 117%75,273
 59,765
 15,508
 26 %
Total$261,295
 $189,715
 $71,580
 38%$342,628
 $244,311
 $98,317
 40 %


The 38%40% increase in homebuilding revenue is driven by the 40%19% increase in homes closed discussed above, partially offset bycoupled with a minor decrease18% increase in ASPthe average sales price of homes closed duringbetween the period.2016 and 2015 periods.
 
Three Months Ended March 31, Increase (Decrease)Three Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015 Amount %2016 2015 Amount %
Average Sales Price of Homes Closed              
California$653,200
 $587,700
 $65,500
 11 %$659,400
 $518,600
 $140,800
 27 %
Arizona256,700
 287,400
 (30,700) (11)%266,300
 269,400
 (3,100) (1)%
Nevada495,800
 801,200
 (305,400) (38)%583,500
 506,700
 76,800
 15 %
Colorado498,000
 443,600
 54,400
 12 %504,500
 477,300
 27,200
 6 %
Washington483,800
 411,600
 72,200
 18 %570,900
 400,900
 170,000
 42 %
Oregon422,500
 343,900
 78,600
 23 %450,700
 417,900
 32,800
 8 %
Total$481,200
 $489,000
 $(7,800) (2)%$509,100
 $433,200
 $75,900
 18 %

The average sales price of homes closed during the 2016 period decreased 2%increased 18% due to a greater proportion of overall deliveriesan increase in the current period in the Arizona and Oregon reporting segments, which have lower price points, and a change in product mix in Nevada. In Nevada, the decrease in average sales price of homes closed, primarily driven by product mix, in all reporting segments except Arizona, which declined by a nominal amount. In addition to the product mix shift, the increase in ASP in Washington was attributablealso due to 4 closings with an average sales price appreciation in excess of $900,000 duringcertain communities that were open in both the 2016 compared with 18 comparable closings in theand 2015 period.


periods.

Gross Margin
Homebuilding gross margins decreased to 17.7%16.6% for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 from 18.8%18.0% in the 2015 period, primarily driven by the application of purchase accounting related to the acquisition of our Washington and Oregon reporting segments, which negatively impacted gross margins by 250 basis points during the 2016 period. Additionally, homebuilding gross margins were negatively impacted by rising labor and land costs, as well as an increase in capitalized interest being amortized through cost of sales.sales, which increased to 400 basis points compared to 340 basis points in the 2015 period, and which also included infrastructure charges included in cost of sales for two sold out projects in Northern California, which impacted gross margins for the period.
For the comparison of the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2015, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage, which excludes previously capitalized interest included in cost of sales as well as the effect of adjustments recorded in relation to purchase accounting, was 24.7%22.2% for the 2016 period compared to 24.6%24.7% for the 2015 period. The decrease was primarily a result of the decrease in homebuilding gross margins described above coupled with a decrease in the impact of purchase accounting.
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. The Company believes this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that interest and purchase accounting have on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with the Company's competitors, who also break out and adjust gross margins in a similar fashion. For comparative purposes purchase accounting is the net adjustment in basis related to the acquisition of our Colorado, Washington and Oregon operating divisions. See table set forth below reconciling this non-GAAP measure to homebuilding gross margin.
 Three Months Ended September 30,
 2016 2015
 (dollars in thousands)
Home sales revenue$342,628
 $244,311
Cost of home sales285,896
 200,328
Homebuilding gross margin56,732
 43,983
Homebuilding gross margin percentage16.6% 18.0%
Add: Interest in cost of sales13,543
 8,373
Add: Purchase accounting adjustments5,687
 7,986
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin$75,962
 $60,342
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage22.2% 24.7%


Construction Services Revenue
Construction services revenue, which is only in the California reporting segment, was $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and $4.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in revenue attributable to one project in Northern California, which has closed out. During the fourth quarter of 2015 and continuing into 2016, the Company finalized significant construction services projects.
Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative
 Three Months Ended September 30, As a Percentage of Home Sales Revenue
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (dollars in thousands)    
Sales and Marketing$18,246
 $15,352
 5.3% 6.3%
General and Administrative17,360
 13,981
 5.1% 5.7%
Total Sales and Marketing & General and Administrative$35,606
 $29,333
 10.4% 12.0%
Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 5.3% in the 2016 period compared to 6.3% in the 2015 period as a result of lower advertising and upfront marketing costs. General and administrative expense as a percentage of home sales revenues decreased to 5.1% in the 2016 period compared to 5.7% in the 2015 period. The decrease is driven by increased revenues and improved operating leverage on our increased headcount.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $1.0 million during the 2015 period. The increase reflects the expanding operations of the mortgage joint ventures in which the Company holds a non-consolidated equity interest.
Other Items
Interest activity for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended September 30,
 2016 2015
Interest incurred$21,293
 $19,271
Less: Interest capitalized21,293
 19,271
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$
 $
Cash paid for interest$14,898
 $12,565
The increase in interest incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the interest incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2015, reflects an increase in the Company's overall debt, offset by a decrease in effective interest rates. The Company capitalized all of the interest it incurred during both periods presented due to its qualifying assets exceeding its outstanding debt.
During the three months ended September 30, 2016 the Company sold two parcels of land resulting in a $2.7 million gain.
Provision for Income Taxes
During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $8.3 million, for an effective tax rate of 33.4%. The significant drivers of the effective rate are the allocation of income to noncontrolling interests, change in the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, and domestic production activities deduction. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.0 million for an effective tax rate of 28.8%.



Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased to $3.4 million during the 2016 period from $0.2 million during the 2015 period, reflecting the stage in the project development cycle of a number of our recently entered into joint venture projects and an increase in deliveries.
Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015 was $13.1 million, and $12.1 million, respectively.
Lots Owned and Controlled
The table below summarizes the Company’s lots owned and controlled as of the periods presented:
 September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
Lots Owned       
California1,625
 2,315
 (690) (30)%
Arizona4,877
 5,289
 (412) (8)%
Nevada3,131
 2,864
 267
 9 %
Colorado1,544
 864
 680
 79 %
Washington1,387
 1,180
 207
 18 %
Oregon1,303
 1,399
 (96) (7)%
Total13,867
 13,911
 (44)  %
Lots Controlled (1)       
California1,069
 419
 650
 155 %
Arizona
 
 
  %
Nevada51
 657
 (606) (92)%
Colorado232
 148
 84
 57 %
Washington1,081
 937
 144
 15 %
Oregon1,849
 1,601
 248
 15 %
Total4,282
 3,762
 520
 14 %
Total Lots Owned and Controlled18,149
 17,673
 476
 3 %
(1)Lots controlled may be purchased by the Company as consolidated projects or may be purchased by newly formed joint ventures.
Total lots owned and controlled has increased to 18,149 lots owned and controlled at September 30, 2016 from 17,673 lots at September 30, 2015.

Comparisons of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to September 30, 2015
Revenues from homes sales increased 36% to $929.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $681.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase is primarily due to the opening of new communities across our reporting segments. The number of net new home orders for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased 7% to 2,211 homes from 2,059 homes for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.


 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
Number of Net New Home Orders       
California591
 547
 44
 8 %
Arizona367
 323
 44
 14 %
Nevada229
 193
 36
 19 %
Colorado204
 200
 4
 2 %
Washington238
 329
 (91) (28)%
Oregon582
 467
 115
 25 %
Total2,211
 2,059
 152
 7 %

The 7% increase in net new homes orders is driven by a 12% increase in average number of sales locations to 73 average locations in 2016, compared to 65 in the 2015 period, driven by an increase in the average number of communities in all reporting segments with the exception of Colorado and Washington.
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 %
Cancellation Rates     
California18% 20% (2)%
Arizona10% 14% (4)%
Nevada17% 21% (4)%
Colorado13% 16% (3)%
Washington15% 20% (5)%
Oregon15% 21% (6)%
Overall15% 19% (4)%
Cancellation rates during the 2016 period decreased to 15% from 19% during the 2015 period. Cancellation rates typically are driven by personal factors affecting buyers and may not be indicative of any overarching trends affecting regions.
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
Average Number of Sales Locations       
California20
 17
 3
 18 %
Arizona8
 7
 1
 14 %
Nevada12
 10
 2
 20 %
Colorado10
 13
 (3) (23)%
Washington6
 6
 
  %
Oregon17
 12
 5
 42 %
Total73
 65
 8
 12 %

The average number of sales locations for the Company increased to 73 locations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 65 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, driven by an increase in community count in all reporting segments except Colorado and Washington during 2016, as the Company continues to convert its land supply


into home sites.
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 
Average Quarterly Absorption Rates     
California9.9 10.7 (0.8)
Arizona15.3 15.4 (0.1)
Nevada6.4 6.4 0
Colorado6.8 5.1 1.7
Washington13.2 18.3 (5.1)
Oregon11.4 13.0 (1.6)
Overall10.1 10.6 (0.5)
The Company's consolidated average quarterly absorption rate, representing number of net new home orders divided by average sales locations by period for the first three quarters of 2016, decreased slightly for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to 10.1 sales per project from 10.6 in the 2015 period. Average quarterly absorption rates declined in Washington from 13.2 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 18.3 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015; however, Washington continues to represent the second highest absorption rate across all reporting segments during the 2016 period.
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
Number of Homes Closed       
California458
 408
 50
 12 %
Arizona324
 132
 192
 145 %
Nevada220
 157
 63
 40 %
Colorado170
 150
 20
 13 %
Washington225
 301
 (76) (25)%
Oregon482
 357
 125
 35 %
Total1,879
 1,505
 374
 25 %

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the number of homes closed increased 25% to 1,879 from 1,505 in the 2015 period. The increase was primarily attributable to the California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Oregon reporting segments, driven by a resulthigher number of homes in backlog to begin the year when compared with the 2015 period, coupled with a 12% increase in cost ofaverage sales slightlylocations from the 2015 period. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the impactWashington reporting segment.
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
 (dollars in thousands)
Home Sales Revenue       
California$305,389
 $223,311
 $82,078
 37 %
Arizona85,399
 36,282
 49,117
 135 %
Nevada128,996
 89,937
 39,059
 43 %
Colorado85,885
 69,457
 16,428
 24 %
Washington112,512
 124,371
 (11,859) (10)%
Oregon210,801
 138,408
 72,393
 52 %
Total$928,982
 $681,766
 $247,216
 36 %
The 36% increase in homebuilding revenue is driven by the 25% increase in homes closed discussed above, coupled with a 9% increase in the average sales price of homes closed between the 2016 and 2015 periods.


 Nine Months Ended September 30, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
Average Sales Price of Homes Closed       
California$666,800
 $547,300
 $119,500
 22 %
Arizona263,600
 274,900
 (11,300) (4)%
Nevada586,300
 572,800
 13,500
 2 %
Colorado505,200
 463,000
 42,200
 9 %
Washington500,100
 413,200
 86,900
 21 %
Oregon437,300
 387,700
 49,600
 13 %
Total$494,400
 $453,000
 $41,400
 9 %

The average sales price of homes closed during the 2016 period increased 9% due to an increase in the average sales price of homes closed, primarily driven by product mix, in all reporting segments except Arizona, which experienced nominal decreases. In addition to the product mix shift, the increase in ASP in Washington was also due to price appreciation in certain communities that were open in both the 2016 and 2015 periods.

Gross Margin
Homebuilding gross margins decreased to 17.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from 18.6% in the 2015 period, primarily driven by rising labor and land costs, as well as an increase in capitalized interest being amortized through cost of sales, which increased to 420 basis points compared to 350 basis points in the 2015 period, and which included infrastructure charges included in cost of sales for two sold out projects in Northern California, which impacted gross margins for the period.
For the comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015, adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage, which excludes previously capitalized interest included in cost of sales as well as the effect of adjustments recorded in relation to purchase accounting.accounting, was 23.5% for the 2016 period compared to 25.1% for the 2015 period. The decrease was primarily a result of the decrease in homebuilding gross margins described above.
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. The Company believes this information is meaningful as it isolates the impact that interest and purchase accounting have on homebuilding gross margin and permits investors to make better comparisons with the Company's competitors, who also break out and adjust gross margins in a similar fashion. For comparative purposes purchase accounting is the net adjustment in basis related to the acquisition of our Colorado, Washington and Oregon operating divisions. See table set forth below reconciling this non-GAAP measure to homebuilding gross margin.
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 20152016 2015
(dollars in thousands)(dollars in thousands)
Home sales revenue$261,295
 $189,715
$928,982
 $681,766
Cost of home sales215,171
 154,081
769,705
 554,657
Homebuilding gross margin46,124
 35,634
159,277
 127,109
Homebuilding gross margin percentage17.7% 18.8%17.1% 18.6%
Add: Interest in cost of sales11,747
 6,701
39,310
 23,750
Add: Purchase accounting adjustments6,593
 4,333
19,938
 20,441
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin$64,464
 $46,668
$218,525
 $171,300
Adjusted homebuilding gross margin percentage24.7% 24.6%23.5% 25.1%



Construction Services Revenue
Construction services revenue, which is only in the California reporting segment, was $3.1$3.8 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, and $7.5$19.3 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in revenue attributable to one project in Northern California.California, which has closed out. During the fourth quarter of 2015 and continuing into 2016, the Company wound downfinalized significant construction services projects.
Sales and Marketing, General and Administrative
Three Months Ended March 31, As a Percentage of Home Sales RevenueNine Months Ended September 30, As a Percentage of Home Sales Revenue
2016 2015 2016 20152016 2015 2016 2015
(dollars in thousands)    (dollars in thousands)    
Sales and Marketing$14,993
 $12,224
 5.7% 6.4%$51,351
 $42,480
 5.5% 6.2%
General and Administrative17,834
 13,948
 6.8% 7.4%51,879
 41,344
 5.6% 6.1%
Total Sales and Marketing & General and Administrative$32,827
 $26,172
 12.5% 13.8%$103,230
 $83,824
 11.1% 12.3%
Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of home sales revenue decreased to 5.7%5.5% in the 2016 period compared to 6.4%6.2% in the 2015 period as result of lower advertising and upfront marketing costs, in addition to improved leverage on our existing headcount.costs. General and administrative expense as a percentage of home sales revenues decreased to 6.8%5.6% in the 2016


period compared to 7.4%6.1% in the 2015 period. The decrease is driven by increased revenues and improved operating leverage on our increased headcount.
Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased to $1.2$3.8 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 from $0.2$1.8 million during the 2015 period. The increase reflects the expanding operations of the mortgage joint ventures in which the Company holds a non-controllingnon-consolidated equity interest.
Other Items
Interest activity for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and March 31,September 30, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 20152016 2015
Interest incurred$20,261
 $18,033
$62,112
 $55,915
Less: Interest capitalized20,261
 18,033
62,112
 55,915
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$
 $
$
 $
Cash paid for interest$14,911
 $11,700
$54,576
 $47,590
The increase in interest incurred for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, compared to the interest incurred for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2015, reflects an increase in the Company's overall debt, offset by a decrease in effective interest rates. The Company capitalized all of the interest it incurred during both periods presented due to its qualifying assets exceeding its outstanding debt.
During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 the Company sold a parcelfive parcels of land toresulting in a third party that did not result in any gain or loss.$2.7 million gain.
Provision for Income Taxes
During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $5.0$20.9 million, for an effective tax rate of 33.7%33.4%. The significant drivers of the effective rate are the allocation of income to noncontrolling interests, change in the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, and domestic production activities deduction. During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2015, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.6$15.8 million for an effective tax rate of 31.9%32.3%.




Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was consistent between periods, totalling $0.9increased to $4.9 million during both the 2016 period from $2.1 million during the 2015 period, reflecting the stage in the project development cycle of a number of our recently entered into joint venture projects and 2015 period.an increase in deliveries.
Net Income Attributable to William Lyon HomesCommon Stockholders
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income attributable to William Lyon Homescommon stockholders for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, and 2015 was $9.0$36.6 million, and $6.7$31.0 million, respectively.
Lots Owned and Controlled
The table below summarizes the Company’s lots owned and controlled as of the periods presented:


 March 31, Increase (Decrease)
 2016 2015 Amount %
Lots Owned       
California1,653
 2,318
 (665) (29)%
Arizona5,122
 5,396
 (274) (5)%
Nevada3,319
 2,982
 337
 11 %
Colorado745
 938
 (193) (21)%
Washington1,570
 1,351
 219
 16 %
Oregon1,142
 1,148
 (6) (1)%
Total13,551
 14,133
 (582) (4)%
Lots Controlled(1)       
California1,317
 1,097
 220
 20 %
Arizona
 
 
  %
Nevada64
 83
 (19) (23)%
Colorado822
 183
 639
 349 %
Washington361
 728
 (367) (50)%
Oregon1,920
 1,249
 671
 54 %
Total4,484
 3,340
 1,144
 34 %
Total Lots Owned and Controlled18,035
 17,473
 562
 3 %
(1)Lots controlled may be purchased by the Company as consolidated projects or may be purchased by newly formed joint ventures.
Total lots owned and controlled has increased to 18,035 lots owned and controlled at March 31, 2016 from 17,473 lots at March 31, 2015.


Financial Condition and Liquidity
Throughout 2015 and into 2016 theThe U.S. housing market has continued to improve on the momentum experienced during 2012 and 2013, albeit at a more moderate pace than in those recent years, and continues to improve from the cyclical low points of previous years.the early years of the last real estate cycle. Strong housing markets have been associated with great affordability, a healthy domestic economy, positive demographic trends, including employment and population growth. While the homebuilding industry encountered some challenges during 2015 and intocontinuing in 2016, including constrained subcontractor and labor availability, increased cycle times, volatility in global and financial markets, and weather challenges during the first threenine months of 2016 the Company has continued to show year-over-year improvement in deliveries, revenues, orders, and pre-tax income.
The Company benefits from a sizable and well-located lot supply, and as of March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company owned 13,55113,867 lots, all of which are entitled, and had options to purchase an additional 4,4844,282 lots. The Company’s lot supply reflects its balanced approach to land investment. The Company has a diverse mix of finished lots available for near-term homebuilding operations and longer-term strategic land positions to support future growth. The Company believes that its current inventory of owned and controlled lots is sufficient to supply the vast majority of its projected future home closings for the next threeseveral years. The Company has continued to experience increased cycle times in a number of its operating segments in the start of 2016, and the availability of qualified trades with the associated delays and cost increases are challenges faced by the Company and the entire homebuilding industry during 2015 and into 2016. The Company continues to implement new strategies to temper the impact of these challenges in an effort to manage cycle times and deliveries.
Since our initial public offering, which raised approximately $163.7 million of net proceeds, the Company has access to the public equity and debt markets, which it has utilized as a significant source of financing for investing in land in our existing markets or financing expansion into new markets, such as the Company’s acquisition of Polygon Northwest Homes during 2014.


The Company provides for its ongoing cash requirements with the proceeds from capital markets transactions, as well as from internally generated funds from the sales of homes and/or land sales. During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company has closed 543delivered 1,879 homes, and recorded total revenuesrecognized home sales revenue of $261.3$929.0 million. During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, the Company used cash in operations of $59.5$83.0 million, which included investment in land acquisitions of $60.2$247.1 million, for net cash generated by operations of $0.7$164.1 million. In addition, the Company has the option to use additional outside borrowing, form new joint ventures with partners that could provide a substantial portion of the capital required for certain projects, buy land via lot options or land banking arrangements, and engage in future transactions in the public equity and debt markets. The Company has financed, and may in the future finance, certain projects and land acquisitions with construction loans secured by real estate inventories, seller-provided financing, land banking transactions, and capital markets transactions. The Company may also draw on its revolving line of credit to fund land acquisitions, as discussed below. We believe we are well-positioned with a strong balance sheet and sufficient liquidity for supporting our ongoing operations and growth initiatives.

Tangible Equity Units
On November 21, 2014, in order to pay down amounts borrowed under the senior unsecured bridge loan facility entered into in conjunction with the Polygon Acquisition, the Company completed its public offering and sale of 1,000,000 6.50% tangible equity units (“TEUs”, or "Units"), sold for a stated amount of $100 per Unit, featuring a 17.5% conversion premium.  On December 3, 2014, the Company sold an additional 150,000 TEUs pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Each TEU is a unit composed of two parts: 
a prepaid stock purchase contract (a “purchase contract”); and


a senior subordinated amortizing note (an “amortizing note”).

Unless settled earlier at the holder’s option, each purchase contract will automatically settle on December 1, 2017 (the "mandatory settlement date"), and the Company will deliver not more than 5.2247 shares of Class A Common Stock and not less than 4.4465 shares of Class A Common Stock on the mandatory settlement date, subject to adjustment, based upon the applicable settlement rate and applicable market value of Class A Common Stock.

Each amortizing note had an initial principal amount of $18.01, bears interest at the annual rate of 5.50% and has a final installment payment date of December 1, 2017. On each March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, commencing on March 1, 2015, William Lyon Homes will pay equal quarterly installments of $1.6250 on each amortizing note (except for the March 1, 2015 installment payment, which was $1.8056 per amortizing note). Each installment will constitute a payment of interest and a partial repayment of principal. The amortizing notes rank equally in right of payment to all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, other than borrowings under the Amended Facility and the Company's secured project level financing, which will be senior in right of payment to the obligations under the amortizing notes, in each case to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.
Each TEU may be separated into its constituent purchase contract and amortizing note on any business day during the period beginning on, and including, the business day immediately succeeding the date of initial issuance of the Units to, but excluding, the third scheduled trading day immediately preceding the mandatory settlement date. Prior to separation, the purchase contracts and amortizing notes may only be purchased and transferred together as Units. The net proceeds received from the TEU issuance were allocated between the amortizing note and the purchase contract under the relative fair value method, with amounts allocated to the purchase contract classified as additional paid-in capital. As of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the amortizing notes had an unamortized carrying value of $12.4$9.0 million and $14.1 million, respectively.
The Company used the net proceeds from the offering of the TEUs to pay down approximately $111.2 million of outstanding debt under a senior unsecured bridge loan facility used to finance the Company's acquisition of Polygon Northwest Homes during 2014.
            
5 3/4% Senior Notes Due 2019
On March 31, 2014, California Lyon completed its offering of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (the "5.75% Notes"), in an aggregate principal amount of $150 million. The 5.75% Notes were issued at 100% of their aggregate principal amount.


As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the 5.75% Notes was $150.0 million, excluding deferred loan costs of $1.6$1.3 million. The 5.75% Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.75% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15, and mature on April 15, 2019. The 5.75% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several unsecured basis by Parent and certain of its existing and future restricted subsidiaries. The 5.75% Notes and the related guarantees are California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt, including California Lyon’s $425 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020 and $350 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.00% Notes, each as described below. The 5.75% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt. The 5.75% Notes and the guarantees are and will be effectively junior to California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.
8 1/2% Senior Notes Due 2020
On November 8, 2012, California Lyon completed its offering of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020, (the "initial 8.5% Notes"), in an aggregate principal amount of $325 million. The initial 8.5% Notes were issued at 100% of their aggregate principal amount.

On October 24, 2013, California Lyon completed the sale to certain purchasers of an additional $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “additional 8.5% Notes”, and together with the initial 8.5% notes, the "8.5% Notes" ) at an issue price of 106.5% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued interest from and including May 15, 2013, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $104.7 million.
As of March 31,September 30, 2016 the outstanding principal amount of the 8.5% Notes was $425 million, excluding unamortized premium of $3.6$2.9 million and deferred loan costs of $5.7$5.1 million. The 8.5% Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.5% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15, and mature on November 15, 2020. The 8.5% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several unsecured basis by Parent and by certain of its existing and future restricted subsidiaries. The 8.5% Notes and the related guarantees are California Lyon's and the guarantors' unsecured senior obligations


and rank equally in right of payment with all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt, including, the 5.75% Notes, as described above, and the 7.00% Notes, as described below. The 8.5% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt. The 8.5% Notes and the guarantees are and will be effectively junior to any of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.

7.00% Senior Notes due 2022
On August 11, 2014, WLH PNW Finance Corp. (“Escrow Issuer”), completed its offering of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “initial 7.00% Notes”), in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million. The initial 7.00% Notes were issued at 100% of their aggregate principal amount. On August 12, 2014, in connection with the consummation of the Polygon Acquisition, Escrow Issuer merged with and into California Lyon, and California Lyon assumed the obligations of the Escrow Issuer under the initial 7.00% Notes and the related indenture by operation of law (the “Escrow Merger”). Following the Escrow Merger, California Lyon is the obligor under the initial 7.00% Notes. In January 2015, we exchanged 100% of the initial 7.00% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act.

On September 15, 2015, California Lyon completed its private placement with registration rights of an additional $50.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “additional 7.00% Notes”, and together with the initial 7.00% Notes, the "7.00% Notes") at an issue price of 102.0% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest from August 15, 2015, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $50.5 million. In January 2016, we exchanged 100% of the additional 7.00% Notes for notes that are freely transferable and registered under the Securities Act.
As of March 31,September 30, 2016, the outstanding principal amount of the 7.00% Notes was $350 million, excluding unamortized premium of $0.9 million and deferred loan costs of $5.5$5.0 million. The 7.00% Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15, and mature on August 15, 2022. The 7.00% Notes are unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several unsecured basis by Parent and certain of its existing and future restricted subsidiaries. The 7.00% Notes and the related guarantees are California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt, including California Lyon’s $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2019 and $425 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020, each as described above. The 7.00% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated debt. The 7.00% Notes and the


guarantees are and will be effectively junior to California Lyon’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such debt.

Senior Notes Covenant Compliance
The indentures governing the 5.75% Notes, the 8.5% Notes, and the 7.00% Notes contain covenants that limit the ability of Parent, California Lyon, and their restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) incur or guarantee certain additional indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends, distributions, or repurchase equity or make payments in respect of subordinated indebtedness; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) sell assets; (v) incur liens; (vi) enter into agreements restricting the ability of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or transfer assets; (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (viii) create unrestricted subsidiaries; and (viii) consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications as described in the Indenture. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of March 31,September 30, 2016.

Revolving Lines of Credit
On March 27, 2015,July 1, 2016, California Lyon and Parent entered into an amendment and restatement agreement, pursuant to which its existing credit agreement providing for a revolving credit facility, of up to $100 million (the "Revolver")as previously amended and restated on March 27, 2015 as described below, was further amended and restated in its entirety (as so further amended and restated, the “Amended“Second Amended Facility”). The Second Amended Facility amends and restates the RevolverCompany’s previous $130.0 million revolving credit facility and provides for total lending commitments of $130.0$145.0 million. In addition, the Second Amended Facility has an uncommitted accordion feature under which the Company may increase the total principal amount up to a maximum aggregate of $200.0 million under certain circumstances, as well as a sublimit of $50.0 million for letters of credit. The Second Amended Facility, among other things, also amended the maturity date of the previous facility to July 1, 2019, provided that the Second Amended Facility will terminate on January 14, 2019 (the “Springing Termination Date”) if, on the Springing Termination Date, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of California Lyon’s 5.75% senior notes due 2019 is equal to or greater than the sum of


(a) 50% of the Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) of California Lyon, Parent, certain of the Parent’s direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries (together with California Lyon and Parent, the “Loan Parties”) and their Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) for the four-quarter period ending September 30, 2018, plus (b) the Liquidity (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) of the Loan Parties and their consolidated subsidiaries on the Springing Termination Date. Further, the Second Amended Facility amended the maximum leverage ratio covenant to extend the timing of the gradual step-downs. Specifically, pursuant to the Second Amended Facility, the maximum leverage ratio will remain at 65% from June 30, 2016 through and including December 30, 2016, will decrease to 62.5% on the last day of the 2016 fiscal year, remain at 62.5% from December 31, 2016 through and including June 29, 2017, and will further decrease to 60% on the last day of the second quarter of 2017 and remain at 60% thereafter. The Second Amended Facility did not revise any of our other financial covenants thereunder.
Prior to the entry into the Second Amended Facility as described above, on March 27, 2015, California Lyon and Parent entered into an amendment and restatement agreement which amended and restated the Company's previous $100 million revolving credit facility and provided for total lending commitments of $130.0 million, an uncommitted accordion feature under which the Company could increase the total principal amount up to a maximum aggregate of $200.0 million under certain circumstances (up from a maximum aggregate of $125.0 million under the previous facility), as well as a sublimit of $50.0 million for letters of credit, and extendsextended the maturity date of the previous facility by one year to August 7, 2017.
TheBorrowings under the Second Amended Facility, contains various covenants, including financial covenants relatingthe availability of which is subject to tangible net worth, leverage, liquiditya borrowing base formula, are required to be guaranteed by the Parent and interest coverage,certain of the Parent's wholly-owned subsidiaries, are secured by a pledge of all equity interests held by such guarantors, and may be used for general corporate purposes. Interest rates on borrowings generally will be based on either LIBOR or a base rate, plus the applicable spread. As of September 30, 2016, the commitment fee on the unused portion of the Second Facility accrues at an annual rate of 0.50%. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $96.0 million and $65.0 million outstanding against the Second Amended Facility, respectively, at effective rates of 4.37% and 3.32%, respectively as well as a limitationletter of credit for $8.6 million outstanding at both dates.
The Second Amended Facility contains certain financial maintenance covenants, including (a) a minimum tangible net worth requirement of $451.0 million (which is subject to increase over time based on investmentssubsequent earnings and proceeds from equity offerings, as well as deferred tax assets to the extent included on the Company's financial statements), (b) a maximum leverage covenant that prohibits the leverage ratio (as defined therein) from exceeding 65%, which maximum leverage ratio decreases to 62.5% effective as of December 31, 2016, and further decreases to 60% effective as of June 30, 2017, and (c) a covenant requiring us to maintain either (i) an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest incurred, as defined therein) of at least 1.50 to 1.00 or (ii) liquidity (as defined therein) of an amount not less than the greater of our consolidated interest incurred during the trailing 12 months and $50.0 million. Our compliance with these financial covenants is measured by calculations and metrics that are specifically defined or described by the terms of the Second Amended Facility and can differ in certain respects from comparable GAAP or other commonly used terms. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Second Amended Facility as of September 30, 2016. The following table summarizes these covenants pursuant to the Second Amended Facility, and our compliance with such covenants as of September 30, 2016:
  Covenant Requirements at Actual at
Financial Covenant September 30, 2016 September 30, 2016
Minimum Tangible Net Worth $524.7 million $664.5 million
Maximum Leverage Ratio 65.0%
 63.5%
Interest Coverage Ratio; or (1)
 1.50x
 2.27x
   Minimum Liquidity (1) $82.4 million $81.1 million

(1)    We are required to meet either the Interest Coverage Ratio or Minimum Liquidity, but not both.
Although the Company does not believe it is likely to breach any of the covenants listed above, including the maximum leverage ratio covenant, based on its current expectations and assumptions, there are certain steps that the Company could take to decrease the likelihood of any breach in the event it was determined that a breach was reasonably likely. The Company remains focused on continuing to drive top line revenue growth which it believes will improve cash flow and generate earnings. In addition, there are certain discretionary levers that the Company has the ability to utilize to the extent it is determined that near-term steps are needed to manage to covenant requirements. For example, land acquisition and development is a strategic investment by the Company to support our future growth plans. While the Company intends to continue to acquire land that it believes is accretive to the Company, the Company's currently owned and controlled land position enables it to be selective and nimble in its future acquisition strategy. The Company also has the option to form new joint ventures with partners that could provide a substantial portion of the capital required for certain projects, purchase land through lot options or land banking


arrangements, as well as utilizing such financing structures as a means to generate incremental cash flow, or adjust the timing of housing starts. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company paid approximately $247.1 million for land and non-guarantor subsidiaries. land developments. Such spending related to land owned is a discretionary component that the Company can temper as needed to reduce cash outflow, and it believes it can do so without a significant impact on near-term operating results.
The Second Amended Facility contains customary events of default, subject to cure periods in certain circumstances, including: nonpayment of principal, interest and fees or other amounts; violation of covenants;covenants, including those financial covenants identified above; inaccuracy of representations and warranties; cross default to certain other indebtedness; unpaid judgments; and certain bankruptcy and other insolvency events.
The occurrence of any event of default could result in the termination of the commitments under the Second Amended Facility and permit the lenders to accelerate payment on outstanding borrowings under the Second Amended Facility and require cash collateralization of outstanding letters of credit. Ifcredit, if we are unable to amend the Second Amended Facility, secure a waiver of the default from the lenders or otherwise cure the default. Further, acceleration of the Second Amended Facility borrowings may result in the acceleration of other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies, including but not limited to our senior notes as described above to the extent the acceleration is above certain threshold amounts, and the triggering default is not cured or waived or any acceleration rescinded, as well as certain notes payable.
In addition, if a change in control (as defined in the Second Amended Facility) occurs, the lenders may terminate the commitments under the Second Amended Facility and require that the the Company repay outstanding borrowings under the Second Amended Facility and cash collateralize outstanding letters of credit. Interest rates on borrowings generally will be based on either LIBOR
The Company believes it has access to alternate sources of funding to pay off resulting obligations or a base rate, plusreplace funding under the applicable spread. The commitment fee on the unused portion of theSecond Amended Facility currently accrues at an annual rateshould there be a likelihood of, 0.50%. Theor anticipated, breach of any covenants, including cash generated from operations and opportunistic land sales. In addition, the Company was in compliance with all covenantshas capacity under the Amended Facility asrestrictive covenants of March 31, 2016.
Borrowings underits senior notes indentures to incur additional indebtedness which it can do through access to the Amended Facility, the availability of which is subject to a borrowing base formula, are required to be guaranteed bydebt capital markets, and the Company and certain ofbelieves it can also raise equity in the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, are secured by a pledge of all equity interests held by such guarantors, and may be used for general corporate purposes. As of March 31, 2016, the Company had $49.0 million outstanding against the Amended Facility at an effective rate of 3.50%, as well as a letter of credit for $8.6 million further reducing the amount available under the Amended Facility.capital markets.

Construction Notes Payable
  
    The Company and certain of its consolidated joint ventures have entered into construction notes payable agreements. The issuance date, facility size, maturity date and interest rate are listed in the table below as of March 31,September 30, 2016 (in millions):





Issuance Date Facility Size Outstanding Maturity Current Rate  Facility Size Outstanding Maturity Current Rate 
March, 2016 $33.4
 $14.7
 September, 2018 3.44%(1) $33.4
 $15.8
 September, 2018 3.53%(1)
January, 2016 35.0
 17.6
 February, 2019 3.68%(2) 35.0
 18.8
 February, 2019 3.78%(2)
November, 2015 42.5
 15.3
 November, 2017 4.50%(1) 42.5
 19.5
 November, 2017 4.50%(1)
August, 2015 (4)
 14.2
 2.8
 August, 2017 4.50%(1) 14.2
 0.7
 August, 2017 4.50%(1)
August, 2015 (4)
 37.5
 10.4
 August, 2017 4.50%(1) 37.5
 7.0
 August, 2017 4.50%(1)
July, 2015 22.5
 14.9
 July, 2018 4.00%(3) 22.5
 14.8
 July, 2018 4.00%(3)
April, 2015 18.5
 13.2
 October, 2017 4.00%(3) 18.5
 13.9
 October, 2017 4.00%(3)
November, 2014 24.0
 17.2
 November, 2017 4.00%(3) 24.0
 13.1
 November, 2017 4.00%(3)
November, 2014 22.0
 15.5
 November, 2017 4.00%(3) 22.0
 12.7
 November, 2017 4.00%(3)
March, 2014 26.0
 15.2
 October, 2016 3.43%(1) 26.0
 14.6
 April, 2018 3.53%(1)
 $275.6
 $136.8
    $275.6
 $130.9
   
(1) Loan bears interest at the Company's option of either LIBOR +3.0% or the prime rate +1.0%.
(2) Loan bears interest at LIBOR +3.25%
(3) Loan bears interest at the prime rate +0.5%.
(4) Loan relates to a project that is wholly-owned by the Company.
The construction notes payable contain certain financial maintenance covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such covenants as of September 30, 2016.



Seller Financing
At September 30, 2016, the Company had $32.4 million of notes payable outstanding related to two land acquisitions for which seller financing was provided. The first note of approximately $3.0 million bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, is secured by the underlying land, and matures in August 2017. This note was entered into with a related party, which is described in more detail in the financial statements. The second note of $29.4 million bears interest at a rate of 7% per annum, is secured by the underlying land, and matures in June 2018.
Net Debt to Total Capital
The Company’s ratio of net debt to net book capital was 60.2%60.8% and 61.1% as of March 31,September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015,, respectively. The ratio of net debt to net book capital is a non-GAAP financial measure, which is calculated by dividing notes payable and Senior Notes, net of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, by net book capital (notes payable and Senior Notes, net of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, plus total equity). The Company believes this calculation is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in understanding the leverage employed in its operations, and may be helpful in comparing the Company with other companies in the homebuilding industry to the extent they provide similar information. See table set forth below reconciling this non-GAAP measure to the ratio of debt to total capital.
SuccessorSuccessor
March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)(dollars in thousands)
Notes payable and Senior Notes$1,114,997
 $1,105,776
$1,185,684
 $1,105,776
Total equity713,608
 671,469
739,313
 671,469
Total capital$1,828,605
 $1,777,245
$1,924,997
 $1,777,245
Ratio of debt to total capital61.0% 62.2%61.6% 62.2%
Notes payable and Senior Notes$1,114,997
 $1,105,776
$1,185,684
 $1,105,776
Less: Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(36,303) (50,707)(40,710) (50,707)
Net debt1,078,694
 1,055,069
1,144,974
 1,055,069
Total equity713,608
 671,469
739,313
 671,469
Total capital$1,792,302
 $1,726,538
$1,884,287
 $1,726,538
Ratio of net debt to total capital60.2% 61.1%60.8% 61.1%
Joint Venture Financing
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are general partners or members in joint ventures involved in the development and sale of residential projects. As described more fully in Critical Accounting Policies—Variable Interest Entities, certain joint ventures have been determined to be variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated with the Company’s financial statements for the periods presented. The financial statements of joint ventures in which the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary are not consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method because the Company has a 50% or less voting or economic interest (and thus such joint ventures are not controlled by the Company). Based upon current estimates,


substantially all future development and construction costs incurred by the joint ventures will be funded by the venture partners or from the proceeds of construction financing obtained by the joint ventures.
During the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2015, the Company acquired a non-controlling interest in an unconsolidated mortgage joint venture.
Assessment District Bonds
In some jurisdictions in which the Company develops and constructs property, assessment district bonds are issued by municipalities to finance major infrastructure improvements and fees. Such financing has been an important part of financing master-planned communities due to the long-term nature of the financing, favorable interest rates when compared to the Company’s other sources of funds and the fact that the bonds are sold, administered and collected by the relevant government entity. As a landowner benefited by the improvements, the Company is responsible for the assessments on its land. When the Company’s homes or other properties are sold, the assessments are either prepaid or the buyers assume the responsibility for the related assessments.


Cash Flows—Comparison of the Three NineMonths Ended March 31,September 30, 2016 to the Three NineMonths Ended March 31,September 30, 2015
For the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 and 2015, the comparison of cash flows is as follows:
Net cash used in operating activities decreased to $59.5$83.0 million in the 2016 period from $61.1$220.4 million in the 2015 period. The change was primarily a result of (i) an increasea net decrease in accrued expensesspending on real estate inventories-owned of $1.3$146.7 million in the 2016 period compared to an decreasespending of $11.2$323.7 million in the 2015 period, primarily due to the timing of payments, (ii) a decrease in receivables of $2.4$3.0 million in the 2016 period compared to a negligible change in the 2015 period, and (iii) a negligible change in escrow proceeds receivable in the 2016 period compared to an increase of $4.3$2.9 million in the 2015 period due to the timing of homes closed, partially offset by (iv) a(iii) net increase in spending on real estate inventories-ownedincome of $77.7$41.5 million in the 2016 period compared to spending of $63.1$33.1 million in the 2015 period, and (iv) an increase in accounts payable of $3.0$1.0 million in the 2016 period compared to an increase of $7.4$63.5 million in the 2015 period due to timing of payments.payments, (vi) an increase in accrued expenses of $11.6 million in the 2016 period compared to an increase of $10.0 million in the 2015 period, and (vii) equity of income in unconsolidated joint ventures of $3.8 million in the 2016 period compared to $1.8 million in the 2015 period.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $5.7$5.4 million in the 2016 period compared net cash used of $1.2$2.3 million in the 2015 period, primarily driven by (i) collections of related party notes of $6.2 million in the 2016 period with no comparable amount in the 2015 period, (ii) net cash paid to unconsolidated joint ventures of $1.0 million in the 2015 period, with no comparable amount in the 2016 period and (iii) purchases of property and equipment of $0.5$0.8 million in the 2016 period, compared to $0.2$1.3 million in the 2015 period.
Net cash provided by financing activities increaseddecreased to $39.5$68.1 million in the 2016 period from $38.9$196.3 million in the 2015 period. The change was primarily the result of (i) net noncontrolling interest contributionsborrowing of $31.8 million in the 2016 period versus net distributions of $5.4 million in the 2015 period and (ii) net borrowings of notes payable of $26.6 million in the 2016 period, with net payments of $0.8 million in the 2015 period, offset by (iii) net payments of $16.0$31.0 million against the revolving line of credit in the 2016 period versus net borrowing of $49.0$85.0 million in the 2015 period, offset by (ii) net noncontrolling interest contributions of $23.4 million in the 2016 period versus net contributions of $4.9 million in the 2015 period and (iii) net borrowings of notes payable of $20.7 million in the 2016 period, versus net borrowings of $63.8 million in the 2015 period.
Based on capital market access and expected sales volume, the Company believes it has sufficient cash and sources of financing for at least the next twelve months.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company enters into certain off-balance sheet arrangements including joint venture financing, option agreements, land banking arrangements and variable interests in consolidated and unconsolidated entities. These arrangements are more fully described above and in Notes 2 and 12 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.” In addition, the Company is party to certain contractual obligations, including land purchases and project commitments, which are detailed in Note 12 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Inflation
The Company’s revenues and profitability may be affected by increased inflation rates and other general economic conditions. In periods of high inflation, demand for the Company’s homes may be reduced by increases in mortgage interest rates. Further, the Company’s profits will be affected by increases in the costs of land, construction, labor and administrative expenses. The Company’s ability to raise prices at such times will depend upon demand and other competitive factors.




Description of Projects and Communities Under Development
The Company���sCompany’s homebuilding projects usually take two to five years to develop. The following table presents project information relating to each of the Company’s homebuilding operating segments as of March 31,September 30, 2016. The section for "Active Projects" includes only projects with lots owned as of March 31,September 30, 2016, lots consolidated in accordance with certain accounting principles as of March 31,September 30, 2016 or homes closed for the period ended March 31,September 30, 2016, and in each case, with an estimated year of first delivery of 2016 or earlier.earlier, or orders in 2016. The section for "Future Owned and Controlled" includes projects with lots owned as of March 31,September 30, 2016 but with an estimated year of first delivery of 2017 or later, parcels of undeveloped land held for future sale, and lots controlled as of March 31,September 30, 2016, in each case aggregated by county. The following table includes certain information that is forward-looking or predictive in nature and is based on expectations and projections about future events. Such information is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecast in the table below. In addition, we undertake no obligation to update or revise the information in the table below to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or changes to projections over time. See "NOTE"CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Active Projects (County or City)Estimated
Year of
First
Delivery
 
Estimated
Number of
Homes at
Completion
(1)
 Cumulative
Homes
Closed as
of March 31,
2016 (2)
 Backlog
at
March 31,
2016 (3)
(4)
 Lots
Owned
as of
March 31,
2016 (5)
 Homes
Closed
for the
Period
Ended
March 31,
2016
 Estimated Sales Price Range (6) Estimated
Year of
First
Delivery
 
Estimated
Number of
Homes at
Completion
(1)
 Cumulative
Homes
Closed as
of September 30,
2016
(2)
 Backlog
at
September 30,
2016
(3) (4)
 Lots
Owned
as of
September 30,
2016
(5)
 Homes
Closed
for the
Period
Ended
September 30,
2016
 Estimated Sales Price Range
(6)
 
CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA       CALIFORNIA       
Orange County:                      
Anaheim                      
Avelina2016 38
 
 
 38
 
 $ 540,000 - 575,000 2017 38
 
 5
 38
 
 $540,000 - 575,000 
Buena Park                      
The Covey (7)2016 67
 
 
 67
 
 $ 790,000 - 840,000 2016 67
 14
 13
 53
 14
 $ 790,000 - 840,000 
Cypress                          
Mackay Place (7)2016 47
 
 1
 47
 
 $ 838,000 - 896,000  2016 47
 12
 18
 35
 12
 $ 838,000 - 896,000  
Dana Point                      
Grand Monarch2015 37
 6
 8
 27
 
 $ 2,604,000 - 2,904,000 2015 37
 12
 4
 25
 6
 $ 2,604,000 - 2,904,000 
Ladera Ranch                      
Artisan2015 29
 3
 
 18
 
 $ 2,550,000 - 3,025,000  2015 14
 4
 2
 10
 1
 $ 2,550,000 - 3,025,000  
Irvine                          
The Vine2016 106
 
 6
 18
 
 $ 485,000 - 620,000 2016 106
 16
 12
 38
 16
 $ 485,000 - 620,000 
Calistoga2016 60
 
 19
 60
 
 $985,000 - $1,325,000 
Rancho Mission Viejo                      
Aurora (7)2016 94
 20
 13
 74
 20
 $ 454,000 - 589,000 2016 94
 43
 13
 51
 43
 $ 454,000 - 589,000 
Vireo (7)2015 90
 18
 14
 72
 8
 $ 575,000 - 635,000 2015 90
 42
 10
 48
 32
 $ 575,000 - 635,000 
Briosa (7)2016 50
 
 
 50
 
 $ 935,000 - 1,055,000 2016 50
 
 1
 50
 
 $ 935,000 - 1,055,000 
Rancho Santa Margarita                      
Dahlia Court2016 36
 
 
 36
 
 $ 499,000 - 619,000 2016 36
 
 1
 36
 
 $ 499,000 - 619,000 
Los Angeles County:                          
Glendora                          
La Colina Estates2015 121
 8
 6
 94
 2
 $ 1,274,000 - 1,654,000 2015 121
 16
 2
 105
 10
 $ 1,274,000 - 1,654,000 
Lakewood                      
Canvas2015 72
 44
 15
 28
 8
 $ 443,000 - 487,000 2015 72
 69
 3
 3
 33
 $ 443,000 - 487,000 
Riverside County:                      
Riverside                      
SkyRidge2014 90
 19
 1
 71
 1
 $ 500,000 - 543,000 2014 90
 22
 
 68
 4
 $ 500,000 - 543,000 
TurnLeaf��                          
Crossings2014 139
 12
 2
 91
 2
 $ 495,000 - 549,000 2014 139
 16
 1
 123
 6
 $ 495,000 - 549,000 
Coventry2015 161
 7
 7
 154
 1
 $ 535,000 - 560,000 
Eastvale             
Nexus2015 220
 76
 10
 144
 66
 $ 338,000 - 362,000 
San Bernardino County:           
Upland           
The Orchards (7)           
Citrus Court2015 77
 32
 12
 45
 20
 $ 324,000 - 394,000 
Citrus Pointe2015 132
 30
 10
 102
 21
 $ 339,000 - 404,000 
Yucaipa           
Cedar Glen2015 143
 106
 21
 37
 36
 $ 306,000 - 322,000 
Alameda County           
Dublin           
Terrace Ridge2015 36
 34
 2
 2
 19
 $ 1,110,000 - 1,170,000 
Newark           
The Cove2016 108
 
 23
 9
 
 $ 616,000 - 741,000 
The Strand2016 157
 
 10
 16
 
 $ 671,000 - 791,000 
The Banks2016 120
 
 34
 24
 
 $ 805,000 - 865,000 


Coventry2015 161
 6
 2
 115
 
 $ 535,000 - 560,000 
Eastvale             
Nexus2015 220
 36
 15
 184
 26
 $ 338,000 - 362,000 
San Bernardino County:           
Upland           
The Orchards (7)           
Citrus Court2015 77
 17
 4
 60
 5
 $ 324,000 - 394,000 
Citrus Pointe2015 132
 13
 7
 119
 4
 $ 339,000 - 404,000 
Yucaipa           
Cedar Glen2015 143
 74
 17
 69
 4
 $ 306,000 - 322,000 
Alameda County           
Dublin           
Terrace Ridge2015 36
 18
 17
 18
 3
 $ 1,110,000 - 1,170,000 
The Tides2016 76
 
 20
 23
 
 $ 864,000 - 894,000 
The Isles2016 81
 
 23
 21
 
 $ 937,000 - 1,007,000 
Contra Costa County:                      
Pittsburgh                      
Vista Del Mar                      
Victory II2014 104
 68
 13
 36
 6
 $ 573,000 - 642,000  2014 104
 89
 14
 15
 27
 $ 583,000 - 652,000  
Victory III2016 11
 7
 4
 4
 7
 $ 573,000 - 642,000 2016 11
 11
 
 
 11
 (8) 
Brentwood                      
Palmilla (7)                      
Cielo2014 56
 55
 
 1
 7
 $ 399,000 - 454,000 2014 56
 56
 
 
 8
 (8) 
Antioch                      
Oak Crest2013 130
 125
 4
 5
 6
 $ 443,000 - 488,000 2013 130
 130
 
 
 11
 (8) 
San Joaquin County:                      
Tracy                      
Maplewood2014 59
 52
 7
 7
 3
 $ 450,000 - 532,000 2014 59
 58
 
 1
 9
 $ 450,000 - 532,000 
Santa Clara County:                      
Morgan Hill                      
Brighton Oaks2015 110
 55
 53
 55
 8
 $ 550,000 - 680,000 2015 110
 72
 37
 38
 25
 $ 550,000 - 680,000 
Mountain View                      
Guild 332015 33
 28
 5
 5
 22
 $ 1,180,000 - 1,495,000  2015 33
 33
 
 
 27
 (8)  
CALIFORNIA TOTAL 2,288

684

214

1,409

142
  2,875

1,000

327

1,374

458
 


Active Projects (County or City)Estimated
Year of
First
Delivery
 Estimated
Number of
Homes at
Completion
(1)
 Cumulative
Homes
Closed as
of September 30,
2016
(2)
 Backlog
at
September 30,
2016
(3) (4)
 Lots
Owned
as of
September 30,
2016
(5)
 Homes
Closed
for the
Period
Ended
September 30,
2016
 Estimated Sales Price Range
(6)
 
ARIZONA              
Maricopa County:              
Queen Creek              
Hastings Farm              
Estates2012 153
 153
 
 
 13
 (8)  
Meridian               
Harvest2015 448
 109
 43
 339
 65
 $ 194,990 - 241,990 
Homestead2015 562
 45
 27
 517
 28
 $ 232,990 - 313,990  
Harmony2015 505
 21
 18
 484
 12
 $ 263,990 - 286,990 
Horizons2016 425
 1
 16
 424
 1
 $ 295,990 - 371,990 
Mesa              
Lehi Crossing              
Settlers Landing2012 235
 173
 39
 62
 41
 $ 234,990 - 276,990 
Wagon Trail2013 244
 135
 42
 109
 35
 $ 249,490 - 311,990 
Monument Ridge2013 248
 76
 30
 172
 25
 $ 279,990 - 384,990  
Albany Village2016 228
 
 7
 228
 
 $ 185,990 - 242,990  
Peoria               
Rio Vista2015 197
 142
 30
 55
 104
 $ 196,990 - 224,990 
ARIZONA TOTAL  3,245
 855
 252
 2,390
 324
   
               
               
NEVADA              
Clark County:              
North Las Vegas              


Active Projects (County or City)Estimated
Year of
First
Delivery
 Estimated
Number of
Homes at
Completion
(1)
 Cumulative
Homes
Closed as
of March 31,
2016 (2)
 Backlog
at
March 31,
2016 (3)
(4)
 Lots
Owned
as of
March 31,
2016 (5)
 Homes
Closed
for the
Period
Ended
March 31,
2016
 Estimated Sales Price Range (6) 
ARIZONA              
Maricopa County:              
Queen Creek              
Hastings Farm              
Estates2012 153
 145
 8
 8
 5
 $ 307,000 - 361,000  
Meridian               
Harvest2015 448
 61
 46
 387
 17
 $ 192,000 - 232,000 
Homestead2015 562
 21
 20
 541
 4
 $ 230,000 - 300,000  
Harmony2015 505
 14
 10
 491
 5
 $ 260,000 - 274,000 
Horizons2016 425
 
 4
 425
 
 $ 292,000 - 360,000 
Mesa              
Tierra Este2013 114
 109
 5
 5
 47
 $ 219,000 - 239,000  
Las Vegas               
Serenity Ridge2013 108
 108
 
 
 11
 (8) 
Lyon Estates2014 89
 58
 17
 31
 28
 $ 408,000 - 538,000 
Tuscan Cliffs2015 76
 22
 6
 54
 10
 $ 650,000 - 786,000 
Brookshire               
Estates2015 35
 22
 5
 13
 19
 $ 595,000 - 631,000 
Heights2015 98
 27
 12
 71
 15
 $ 369,000 - 391,000 
Las Vegas - Summerlin               
Sterling Ridge               
Grand2014 137
 75
 6
 62
 20
 $ 875,000 - 920,000 
Premier2014 62
 58
 2
 4
 9
 $ 1,244,000 - 1,312,000  
Allegra2016 88
 18
 10
 70
 18
 $ 499,000 - 532,000  
Silver Ridge2016 83
 5
 13
 27
 5
 $ 1,294,000 - 1,362,000 
Henderson              
Lago Vista2016 52
 1
 5
 51
 1
 $ 765,000 - 828,000  
The Peaks2016 88
 
 4
 88
 
 $ 475,000 - 495,000  
Nye County:               
Pahrump              
Mountain Falls              
Series I2011 242
 157
 30
 85
 28
 $ 159,000 - 188,000 
Series II2014 187
 27
 9
 160
 9
 $ 221,000 - 304,000 
NEVADA TOTAL  1,459
 687
 124
 721
 220
   
               
               
COLORADO              
Arapahoe County              
Aurora Southshore              
Hometown2014 68
 63
 5
 5
 22
  $ 359,000 - 390,000 
Generations2014 15
 13
 
 2
 2
  $ 401,000 - 494,000 
Harmony2015 10
 10
 
 
 4
 (8) 
Signature I2015 7
 5
 2
 2
 4
  $ 538,000 - 591,000 
Filing 52016 30
 2
 
 28
 2
  $ 423,000 - 497,000 
Artistry2016 61
 12
 21
 49
 12
  $ 426,000 - 487,000 
Centennial              
Greenfield2016 35
 
 13
 35
 
  $ 455,000 - 510,000 
Douglas County              
Castle Rock              
Cliffside2014 49
 38
 5
 11
 11
  $ 518,000 - 596,000 
Grand County              
Granby              
Granby Ranch2012 44
 19
 
 25
 1
 (12) 
Jefferson County              
Arvada              
Candelas Sundance2014 66
 66
 
 
 6
 (8) 
Candelas II              
Generations2015 91
 26
 9
 65
 23
  $ 413,000 - 489,000 
Tapestry2015 110
 3
 8
 107
 3
  $ 451,000 - 532,000 
Leydon Rock              
Garden2014 56
 28
 7
 28
 11
  $ 411,000 - 451,000 
Park2015 78
 54
 6
 24
 17
  $ 394,000 - 457,000 
Larimer County              
Fort Collins              
Timnath Ranch              


Lehi Crossing              
Settlers Landing2012 235
 140
 29
 95
 8
 $ 234,490 - 269,490 
Wagon Trail2013 244
 108
 26
 136
 8
 $ 249,000 - 305,000 
Monument Ridge2013 248
 56
 19
 192
 5
 $ 279,000 - 370,000  
Albany Village2016 228
 
 
 228
 
 $ 182,000 - 231,000  
Peoria               
Rio Vista2015 197
 68
 73
 129
 30
 $ 196,000 - 223,000 
ARIZONA TOTAL  3,245
 613
 235
 2,632
 82
   
NEVADA              
Clark County:              
North Las Vegas              
Tierra Este2013 114
 74
 15
 40
 12
 $ 219,000 - 239,000  
Las Vegas               
Serenity Ridge2013 108
 106
 2
 2
 9
 $ 478,000 - 558,000 
Lyon Estates2014 128
 38
 18
 90
 8
 $ 408,000 - 538,000 
Sterling Ridge               
Grand2014 137
 57
 19
 80
 2
 $ 875,000 - 920,000 
Premier2014 62
 50
 4
 12
 1
 $ 1,244,000 - 1,312,000  
Allegra2016 88
 2
 15
 86
 2
 $ 523,000 - 542,000  
Silver Ridge2016 83
 
 9
 22
 
 $ 1,294,000 - 1,362,000 
Tuscan Cliffs2015 77
 13
 7
 64
 1
 $ 650,000 - 786,000 
Brookshire               
Estates2015 35
 10
 13
 25
 7
 $ 595,000 - 631,000 
Heights2015 98
 17
 3
 81
 5
 $ 369,000 - 391,000 
Charleston & 215 (7)              
Affinity - Type 12016 192
 
 
 192
 
 $ 233,000 - 290,000 
Affinity - Type 22016 117
 
 
 117
 
 $ 296,000 - 358,000 
Affinity - Type 32016 96
 
 
 96
 
 $ 370,000 - 390,000 
Affinity - Type 42016 80
 
 
 80
 
 $ 442,000 - 445,000 
Henderson              
Lago Vista2016 52
 1
 3
 51
 1
 $ 765,000 - 935,000  
The Peaks2016 88
 
 
 88
 
 $ 475-000 - 495,000  
Nye County:               
Pahrump              
Mountain Falls              
Series I2011 211
 142
 5
 69
 13
 $ 154,000 - 183,000 
Series II2014 218
 19
 6
 199
 1
 $ 221,000 - 304,000 
NEVADA TOTAL  1,984
 529
 119
 1,394
 62
   
               
COLORADO              
Arapahoe County              
Aurora Southshore              
Hometown I2014 68
 44
 15
 24
 3
  $ 359,000 - 385,000 
Generations2014 15
 13
 
 2
 2
  $ 401,000 - 494,000 
Harmony2015 10
 7
 1
 3
 1
  $ 418,000 - 509,000 
Signature I2015 7
 3
 3
 4
 2
  $ 538,000 - 591,000 
Hometown II2016 30
 2
 
 28
 2
  $ 384,000 - 417,000 
Artistry2016 61
 2
 6
 59
 2
  $ 420,000 - 481,000 
Centennial              
Greenfield2016 35
 
 
 35
 
  $ 440,000 - 495,000 
Douglas County              
Castle Rock              
Cliffside2014 49
 31
 10
 18
 4
  $ 518,000 - 596,000 
Sonnet2014 55
 42
 5
 13
 12
  $ 397,000 - 469,000 
Park2014 92
 51
 18
 41
 24
  $ 367,000 - 395,000 
Loveland              
Lakes at Centerra2015 200
 27
 13
 39
 16
  $ 363,000 - 403,000 
COLORADO TOTAL  1,067

459

112

474

170
   


Grand County              
Granby              
Granby Ranch2012 19
 19
 
 
 1
  (8) 
Jefferson County              
Arvada              
Candelas Sundance2014 66
 64
 1
 2
 4
  $ 391,000 - 440,000 
Candelas II              
Generations2015 91
 9
 14
 82
 6
  $ 405,000 - 481,000 
Tapestry2015 110
 1
 3
 109
 1
  $ 444,000 - 525,000 
Leydon Rock              
Garden2014 56
 19
 8
 37
 2
  $ 406,000 - 446,000 
Park2015 78
 46
 11
 32
 9
  $ 387,000 - 452,000 
Larimer County              
Fort Collins              
Timnath Ranch              
Sonnet2014 179
 31
 7
 148
 1
  $ 388,000 - 461,000 
Park2014 92
 36
 12
 56
 9
  $ 359,000 - 394,000 
Loveland              
Lakes at Centerra2015 200
 15
 12
 51
 4
  $ 358,000 - 398,000 
COLORADO TOTAL  1,166

342

103

690

53
   


Active Projects (County or City)Estimated
Year of
First
Delivery
 Estimated
Number of
Homes at
Completion
(1)
 Cumulative
Homes
Closed as
of September 30,
2016
(2)
 Backlog
at
September 30,
2016
(3) (4)
 Lots
Owned
as of
September 30,
2016
(5)
 Homes
Closed
for the
Period
Ended
September 30,
2016
 Estimated Sales Price Range
(6)
 
WASHINGTON (9)              
King County:              
The Brownstones at Issaquah Highlands2014 176
 173
 3
 3
 59
 $ 569,990 - 659,990 
The Towns at Mill Creek Meadows2014 122
 122
 
 
 5
  (8) 
Bryant Heights SF2015 14
 12
 
 2
 9
 $ 1,250,000 - 1,390,000 
Bryant Heights MF2016 39
 
 
 39
 
 $790,990 - 914,990 
Highcroft at Sammamish2016 121
 14
 20
 85
 14
 $ 879,990 - 1,049,990 
Peasley Canyon2016 153
 15
 14
 52
 15
 $ 404,490 - 464,900 
Ridgeview Townhomes2016 40
 
 6
 40
 
 $ 399,990 - 539,990 
Snohomish County:              
The Reserve at North Creek2014 221
 221
 
 
 6
  (8) 
Silverlake Center2015 100
 96
 4
 4
 51
 $ 269,990 - 329,990 
Riverfront2016 425
 
 8
 425
 
 $ 249,990 - 499,990 
Pierce County:              
Spanaway 2302015 115
 113
 2
 2
 66
 $ 269,990 - 294,990 
WASHINGTON TOTAL  1,526

766

57

652

225
   
               
OREGON (9)              
Clackamas County:              
Calais at Villebois - Rumpf Alley2015 58
 58
 
 
 15
 (8) 
Calais at Villebois - Rumpf Traditional2015 26
 26
 
 
 11
 (8) 
Villebois2014 183
 160
 8
 23
 21
 $ 284,990 - 469,990 
Villebois Zion III - Alley2015 51
 32
 
 19
 16
 $ 329,990 - 399,990 
Villebois Lund Cottages2015 67
 36
 
 31
 16
 $ 299,990 - 304,990 
Villebois Lund Townhomes2015 42
 26
 2
 16
 22
 $ 259,990 - 279,990 
Villebois Lund Alley2016 96
 11
 
 85
 9
 $ 324,990 - 369,990 
Grande Pointe at Villebois2016 100
 15
 5
 85
 15
 $ 449,990 - 589,990 
Villebois V2016 93
 12
 20
 81
 12
 $ 339,990 - 409,990 
Villebois Village Center 75 & 83 & 802016 99
 
 22
 99
 
 $ 259,990 - 299,990 
Washington County:              
Baseline Woods2014 130
 130
 
 
 17
 (8) 
Baseline Woods II2015 102
 102
 
 
 54
 (8) 
Sequoia Village2016 157
 10
 49
 147
 10
 $ 249,990 - 289,990 
Murray & Weir2014 81
 81
 
 
 9
 (8) 
Twin Creeks2014 94
 91
 2
 3
 37
 $ 479,990 - 614,990 
Bethany West - Alley2015 94
 70
 13
 9
 40
 $ 379,990 - 459,990 


Active Projects (County or City)Estimated
Year of
First
Delivery
 Estimated
Number of
Homes at
Completion
(1)
 Cumulative
Homes
Closed as
of March 31,
2016 (2)
 Backlog
at
March 31,
2016 (3)
(4)
 Lots
Owned
as of
March 31,
2016 (5)
 Homes
Closed
for the
Period
Ended
March 31,
2016
 Estimated Sales Price Range (6) 
WASHINGTON (9)              
King County:              
The Brownstones at Issaquah Highlands2014 176
 137
 11
 39
 23
 $ 519,990 - 649,990 
The Towns at Mill Creek Meadows2014 122
 122
 
 
 5
  (8) 
Bryant Heights2015 89
 8
 2
 81
 5
 $ 535,990 - 1,390,000 
Highcroft at Sammamish2016 121
 
 14
 77
 
 $ 874,990 - 1,049,990 
Peasley Canyon2016 153
 
 3
 
 
 $ 389,990 - 459,990 
Ridgeview Townhomes2016 40
 
 
 40
 
 $ 399,990 - 515,990 
High Point Block 342016 54
 
 
 54
 
 $ 335,990 - 545,990 
North Bend Cottages2016 37
 
 
 37
 
 $ 375,990 - 455,990 
Snohomish County:              
The Reserve at North Creek2014 127
 123
 4
 4
 2
 $ 549,990 - 564,990 
Silverlake Center2015 100
 61
 10
 39
 16
 $ 246,990 - 329,990 
Riverfront2016 425
 
 
 425
 
 $ 249,990 - 499,990 
Pierce County:              
Spanaway 2302015 230
 64
 16
 166
 17
 $ 234,990 - 349,990 
WASHINGTON TOTAL  1,674

515

60

962

68
   
               
OREGON (9)              
Clackamas County:              
Calais at Villebois - Rumpf Alley2015 58
 45
 5
 13
 2
 $ 419,990 - 459,990 


Calais at Villebois - Rumpf Traditional2015 26
 24
 2
 2
 9
 $ 499,990 - 579,500 
Villebois2014 183
 144
 4
 39
 5
 $ 284,990 - 469,990 
Villebois Zion III - Alley2015 51
 24
 4
 27
 8
 $ 329,990 - 389,990 
Villebois Lund Cottages2015 75
 27
 7
 48
 7
 $ 254,990 - 289,990 
Villebois Lund Townhomes2015 42
 8
 2
 34
 4
 $ 239,990 - 259,990 
Villebois Lund Alley2015 88
 4
 7
 84
 2
 $ 304,990 - 354,990 
Grande Pointe at Villebois2016 100
 
 3
 100
 
 $ 439,990 - 589,990 
Villebois V2016 93
 
 
 93
 
 $ 304,990 - 354,990 
Villebois Village Center 75 & 83 & 802016 149
 
 
 149
 
 $ 237,990 - 258,990 
Washington County:              
Baseline Woods2014 130
 113
 1
 17
 
 $ 289,990 - 379,990 
Baseline Woods SFD II2015 102
 77
 24
 25
 29
 $ 329,990 - 454,990 
Cornelius Pass2016 157
 
 
 157
 
 $ 234,990 - 239,990 
Murray & Weir2014 81
 78
 3
 3
 6
 $ 394,990 - 424,990 
Twin Creeks at Cooper Mountain2014 94
 61
 14
 33
 7
 $ 479,990 - 614,990 
Bethany West - Alley2015 94
 34
 12
 27
 4
 $ 374,990 - 459,990 
Bethany West - Cottage2015 61
 17
 13
 22
 1
 $ 319,990 - 389,990 
Bethany West - Traditional2015 82
 58
 1
 3
 13
 $ 569,990 - 664,990 
Bethany West - Townhomes2016 32
 
 
 
 
 $ 264,990 - 284,990 
Bethany West - Weisenfluh2016 36
 1
 10
 35
 1
 $ 569,990 - 659,990 
BM2 West River Terrace - Townhomes2016 46
 
 
 
 
 $ 264,990 - 294,990 
BM2 West River Terrace - Alley2016 60
 
 
 2
 
 $ 364,990 - 409,990 
BM2 West River Terrace - Med/Std2016 31
 
 
 2
 
 $ 464,990 -564,990 
Bull Mountain Dickson2016 82
 
 
 82
 
 $ 539,990 - 649,990 
Orenco Woods SFD2015 71
 64
 7
 7
 21
 $ 359,990 - 519,990 
North Plains at Sunset Ridge2015 104
 36
 35
 68
 17
 $ 324,990 - 429,990 
OREGON TOTAL  2,128

815

154

1,072

136
   
               
Future Owned and Controlled (by County)         Lots Owned or Controlled as of March 31, 2016 (10)     
CALIFORNIA              
Orange County        357
     
Los Angeles County        114
     
Riverside County        76
     
San Bernardino County        70
     
Alameda County        594
     
Contra Costa County        296
     
Sonoma County        54
     
ARIZONA              
Maricopa County (11)        2,490
     
NEVADA              
Nye County (11)        1,925
     
Clark County        64
     


Bethany West - Cottage2015 61
 45
 12
 9
 29
 $ 349,990 - 389,990 
Bethany West - Traditional2015 82
 64
 10
 5
 19
 $ 569,990 - 664,990 
Bethany West - Weisenfluh2016 36
 23
 5
 13
 23
 $ 569,990 - 659,990 
BM2 West River Terrace - Alley2016 60
 5
 19
 36
 5
 $ 364,990 - 409,990 
BM2 West River Terrace - Med/Std2016 31
 1
 14
 22
 1
 $ 464,990 -564,990 
Bull Mountain Dickson2016 82
 3
 13
 79
 3
 $ 549,990 - 649,990 
Orenco Woods2015 71
 71
 
 
 28
 (8) 
Sunset Ridge2015 104
 89
 5
 15
 70
 $ 349,990 - 499,990 
OREGON TOTAL 2,000

1,161

199

777

482
 
           
Future Owned and Controlled (by County)        Lots Owned or Controlled as of September 30, 2016 (10)   
CALIFORNIA           
Orange County       264
   
Los Angeles County       95
   
San Bernardino County       70
   
Alameda County       541
   
Contra Costa County       296
   
Sonoma County       54
   
ARIZONA           
Maricopa County (11)       2,487
   
NEVADA           
Nye County (11)       1,925
   
Clark County       536
   
COLORADO                      
Grand County (11)       25
   
Larimer County       134
          258
   
Arapahoe       30
   
Denver       688
   
Boulder County       98
   
Arapahoe County       248
   
Denver County       698
   
WASHINGTON                      
King County       895
          928
   
Pierce County       814
   
Snohomish County       74
          74
   
OREGON                      
Clackamas County       197
          249
   
Washington County       1,793
          2,126
   
TOTAL FUTURE       9,876
          11,761
   
                      
GRAND TOTALS 12,485
 3,498
 885
 18,035
 543
  12,172
 4,928
 1,071
 18,149
 1,879
 
 
(1)The estimated number of homes to be built at completion is subject to change, and there can be no assurance that the Company will build these homes. Includes lots owned, controlled or previously closed as of periods presented.
(2)“Cumulative Homes Closed” represents homes closed since the project opened, and may include prior years, in addition to the homes closed during the current year presented.
(3)Backlog consists of homes sold under sales contracts that have not yet closed, and there can be no assurance that closings of sold homes will occur.
(4)Of the total homes subject to pending sales contracts as of March 31,September 30, 2016, 794928 represent homes that are completed or under construction.
(5)Lots owned as of March 31,September 30, 2016 include lots in backlog at March 31,September 30, 2016.


(6)Estimated sales price range reflects the most recent pricing updates of the base price only and excludes any lot premium, buyer incentive and buyer selected options, which vary from project to project. Sales prices reflect current pricing estimates and might not be indicative of past or future pricing. Further, any potential benefit to be gained from an increase in sales price ranges as compared to previously estimated amounts may be offset by increases in costs, profit participation, and other factors.
(7)Project is a joint venture and is consolidated as a VIE in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation.
(8)Project is completely sold out, therefore the sales price range is not applicable as of March 31,September 30, 2016.
(9)The Company's Washington and Oregon segments were acquired on August 12, 2014 as part of the Polygon Acquisition. Estimated number of homes at completion is the number of homes to be built post-acquisition. Homes closed are from acquisition date through March 31,September 30, 2016.
(10)Includes projects with lots owned as of March 31,September 30, 2016 but with an estimated year of first delivery of 2017 or later, as well as lots controlled as of March 31,September 30, 2016, and parcels of undeveloped land held for future sale. Certain lots controlled are under land banking arrangements which may become owned and produce deliveries during 2016. Actual homes at completion may change prior to the marketing and sales of homes in these projects and the sales price ranges for these projects are to be determined and will be based on current market conditions and other factors upon the commencement of active selling. There can be no assurance that the Company will acquire any of the controlled lots reflected in these amounts.
(11)Represents a parcel of undeveloped land held for future sale. It is unknown when the Company plans to develop homes on this land.
Income Taxes
See Note 9 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for a description of the Company’s income taxes.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and costs and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those which impact its most critical accounting policies. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. As disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company’s most critical accounting policies are debtor in possession accounting;


fresh start accounting; real estate inventories and cost of sales; impairment of real estate inventories; sales and profit recognition; variable interest entities; business combinations; and income taxes. Management believes that there have been no significant changes to these policies during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016, as compared to those disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Although no significant changes have been made to the policy, the impairment of real estate inventories policy has been included below as to expand the definition of the Company's calculation of sales absorption rates.
Impairment of Real Estate Inventories
The Company accounts for its real estate inventories in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant & Equipment. ASC Topic 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on real estate inventories when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by real estate inventories are less than the carrying amount of such assets. Indicators of impairment include a decrease in demand for housing due to softening market conditions, competitive pricing pressures which reduce the average sales price of homes, which includes sales incentives for homebuyers, slowing sales absorption rates (calculated as net new homes orders divided by average sales locations for a given period), a decrease in home values in the markets in which the Company operates, significant decreases in gross margins and a decrease in project cash flows for a particular project.
For land and land under development, homes completed and under construction and model homes, the Company estimates expected cash flows at the project level by maintaining current budgets using recent historical information and current market assumptions. The Company updates project budgets and cash flows of each real estate project on a quarterly basis to determine whether the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows of the project are more or less than the carrying amount (net book value) of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows are more than the net book value of the project, then there is no impairment. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the net book value of the asset, then the asset is deemed to be impaired and is written-down to its fair value. Fair value represents the amount at which an asset could be bought


or sold in a current transaction between willing parties (i.e., other than a forced or liquidation sale). Management determines the estimated fair value of each project by determining the present value of estimated future cash flows at discount rates that are commensurate with the risk of each project. The estimation process involved in determining if assets have been impaired and in the determination of fair value is inherently uncertain because it requires estimates of future revenues and costs, current market yields as well as future events and conditions. As described more fully above in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 entitled “Real Estate Inventories and Cost of Sales,” estimates of revenues and costs are supported by the Company’s budgeting process.
Under FASB ASC Topic 360, when indicators of impairment are present the Company is required to make certain assumptions to estimate undiscounted future cash flows of a project, which include: (i) estimated sales prices, including sales incentives, (ii) anticipated sales absorption rates and sales volume, (iii) project costs incurred to date and the estimated future costs of the project based on the project budget, (iv) the carrying costs related to the time a project is actively selling until it closes the final unit in the project, and (v) alternative strategies including selling the land to a third-party or temporarily suspending development on the project. During the period ended September 30, 2016, no indicators of impairment were noted by the Company.
The assumptions and judgments used by the Company in the estimation process to determine the future undiscounted cash flows of a project and its fair value are inherently uncertain and require a substantial degree of judgment. The realization of the Company’s real estate inventories is dependent upon future uncertain events and market conditions. Due to the subjective nature of the estimates and assumptions used in determining the future cash flows of a project, the continued decline in the current housing market, the uncertainty in the banking and credit markets, actual results could differ materially from current estimates.
These estimates are dependent on specific market or sub-market conditions for each subdivision. While the Company considers available information to determine what it believes to be its best estimates as of the end of a reporting period, these estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change. Local market-specific conditions that may impact these estimates for a subdivision include:
historical subdivision results, and actual operating profit, base selling prices and home sales incentives;
forecasted operating profit for homes in backlog;
the intensity of competition within a market or sub-market, including publicly available home sales prices and home sales incentives offered by our competitors;
increased levels of home foreclosures;
the current sales pace for active subdivisions;
subdivision specific attributes, such as location, availability of lots in the sub-market, desirability and uniqueness of subdivision location and the size and style of homes currently being offered;
changes by management in the sales strategy of a given subdivision; and
current local market economic and demographic conditions and related trends and forecasts.
These and other local market-specific conditions that may be present are considered by personnel in the Company’s homebuilding divisions as they prepare or update the forecasted assumptions for each subdivision. Quantitative and qualitative factors other than home sales prices could significantly impact the potential for future impairments. The sales objectives can differ among subdivisions, even within a given sub-market. For example, facts and circumstances in a given subdivision may lead the Company to price its homes with the objective of yielding a higher sales absorption pace, while facts and circumstances in another subdivision may lead the Company to price its homes to minimize deterioration in home gross margins, even though this could result in a slower sales absorption pace. Furthermore, the key assumptions included in estimated future undiscounted cash flows may be interrelated. For example, a decrease in estimated base sales price or an increase in home sales incentives may result in a corresponding increase in sales absorption pace. Additionally, a decrease in the average sales price of homes to be sold and closed in future reporting periods for one subdivision that has not been generating what management believes to be an adequate sales absorption pace may impact the estimated cash flow assumptions of a nearby subdivision. Changes in key assumptions, including estimated construction and land development costs, absorption pace, selling strategies or discount rates could materially impact future cash flow and fair value estimates. Due to the number of possible scenarios that would result from various changes in these factors, the Company does not believe it is possible to develop a sensitivity analysis with a level of precision that would be meaningful to an investor.
Management assesses land deposits for impairment when estimated land values are deemed to be less than the agreed upon contract price. The Company considers changes in market conditions, the timing of land purchases, the ability to renegotiate with land sellers the terms of the land option contract in question, the availability and best use of capital, and other


factors. If land values are determined to be less than the contract price, the future project will not be purchased. The Company records abandoned land deposits and related pre-acquisition costs to cost of sales-land in the consolidated statement of operations in the period that it is abandoned.
The Company evaluates homebuilding assets for impairment when indicators of impairments are present. Indicators of potential impairment include, but are not limited to, a decrease in housing market values, sales absorption rates, and sales prices. On February 24, 2012, the Company adopted fresh start accounting under ASC 852, Reorganizations, and recorded all real estate inventories at fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no impairment charges recorded. During the period ended September 30, 2016, no indicators of impairment were noted by the Company.



Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to the Company’s floating rate debt with a total outstanding balance at March 31,September 30, 2016 of $185.8226.9 million where the interest rate is variable based upon certain bank reference or prime rates. The average prime rate during the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2016 was 3.50%. Based upon the amount of variable rate debt held by the Company, and holding the variable rate debt balance constant, each 1% increase in interest rates would increase the amount of interest expense incurred by the Company by approximately $1.9$2.3 million.
The following table presents principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, interest rates and the estimated fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt obligations as of March 31,September 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
 
Years ending December 31, Thereafter Total 
Fair Value  at
March 31,  2016
Years ending December 31, Thereafter Total 
Fair Value  at
September 30,  2016
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 
Fixed rate debt$
 $12,390
 $
 $150,000
 $425,000
 $350,000
 $937,390
 $921,577
$
 $11,950
 $29,439
 $150,000
 $425,000
 $350,000
 $966,389
 $999,914
Interest rate% 5.5% % 5.75% 8.50% 7.0% 
 
% 5.0 - 7.0%
 7.0% 5.75% 8.50% 7.0% 
 
The Company does not utilize swaps, forward or option contracts on interest rates, foreign currencies or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments as of or during the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2016. The Company does not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
 


Item 4.Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and, in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation as of March 31,September 30, 2016, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31,September 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management determined that as of March 31,September 30, 2016, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter then ended that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


WILLIAM LYON HOMES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, most of which relate to routine litigation and some of which are covered by insurance. These matter are subject to many uncertainties and the outcomes of these matters are not within our control and may not be known for prolonged periods of time. Nevertheless, in the opinion of the Company’s management, the Company does not have any currently pending litigation of which the outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial position.
 
Item 1A.Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016, as our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by any of the risks and uncertainties described therein. There have been no material changes to the risk factors we previously disclosed in our Annualsuch reports. Some statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for10-Q, including statements in the year ended December 31, 2015.

following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section titled, “CAUTIONARY NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The table below summarizes the number of shares of our Class A Common Stock that were repurchased from certain employees of the Company during the three month period ended March 31,September 30, 2016. Such shares were not repurchased pursuant to a publicly announced plan or program. Those shares were repurchased to facilitate income tax withholding payments pertaining to stock-based compensation awards that vested during the three month period ended March 31,September 30, 2016.
Month Ended Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Per Share
January 31, 2016 
 N/A
February 29, 2016 
 N/A
March 31, 2016 69,912
 $11.87
Total 69,912
  


Month Ended Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Per Share
July 31, 2016 
 N/A
August 31, 2016 4,601
 $15.89
September 30, 2016 
 N/A
Total 4,601
  
Except as set forth above, the Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities during the three month period ended March 31,September 30, 2016.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
 
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.


Item 5.Other Information
Not applicable.


Item 6.Exhibits
Exhibit Index
 
Exhibit
No.
Description
  
10.1†+10.1William Lyon Homes 2012 Equity Incentive Plan FormAmendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Performance Based).
10.2†+William Lyon Homes 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10.3†Offer letter by and betweenJuly 1, 2016 among William Lyon Homes, Inc. and General, a California corporation, as Borrower, William Lyon datedHomes, a Delaware corporation, as Parent, each subsidiary of March 22, 2016the Borrower party thereto, the lenders listed on Schedule 1 thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed March 22,July 7, 2016)
  
31.1+Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
31.2+Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document.
  
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
  
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
  
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
  
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
  
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbased Document.

+Filed herewith
Management contract or compensatory agreement
  
*The information in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (including this Report), unless the Registrant specifically incorporates the foregoing information into those documents by reference.
**Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and will not be deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those Sections.



WILLIAM LYON HOMES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 WILLIAM LYON HOMES,
 a Delaware corporation
   
Date: May 9,November 7, 2016By:
/S/    COLIN T. SEVERN        
  Colin T. Severn
  
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Signatory)



Exhibit Index
 
Exhibit
No.
Description
  
10.1†+10.1William Lyon Homes 2012 Equity Incentive Plan FormAmendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Performance Based).
10.2†+William Lyon Homes 2012 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10.3†Offer letter by and betweenJuly 1, 2016 among William Lyon Homes, Inc. and General, a California corporation, as Borrower, William Lyon datedHomes, a Delaware corporation, as Parent, each subsidiary of March 22, 2016the Borrower party thereto, the lenders listed on Schedule 1 thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Form 8-K filed March 22,July 7, 2016)
  
31.1+Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
31.2+Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document.
  
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
  
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
  
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
  
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
  
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbased Document.

+Filed herewith
  
Management contract or compensatory agreement
*
The information in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (including this Report), unless the Registrant specifically incorporates the foregoing information into those documents by reference.
**Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and will not be deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those Sections.


5463