UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ______

Commission File Number: 001-31989

INTERNAP CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



Delaware	91-2145721
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)

12120 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 330

~~One Ravinia Drive, Suite 1300~~

~~Atlanta, Georgia 30346~~Reston, VA 20190

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(404) 302-9700

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	ý
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨
~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~		Emerging growth company	¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

As of ~~October 19, 2017, 83,383,287~~November 1, 2018, 25,512,514 shares of the registrant’s outstanding common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were outstanding.

INTERNAP CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE ~~QUARTER~~QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2017~~2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

	~~Unaudited~~ Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss	1

	~~Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets~~	2

	~~Unaudited~~ Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	2

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	3

	~~Unaudited Condensed~~ Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	4

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	13 19

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	21 29

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	22 30

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	22 31

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	2232

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	2332

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	33

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	24 36

SIGNATURES

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL ~~STATMENTS~~STATEMENTS

INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~UNAUDITED~~ CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenues:
INAP COLO	$	51,344		$	54,998		$	156,727		$	166,707
INAP CLOUD	17,563			18,942			53,955			57,473
Total revenues	68,907			73,940			210,682			224,180
Net revenues													$	82,972		$	68,907		$	239,135		$	210,682

Operating costs and expenses:
Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, shown below:
INAP COLO	20,785			26,676			67,661			79,745
INAP CLOUD	4,160			4,886			12,758			14,264
Direct costs of customer support	6,237			7,985			19,634			24,709
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization													28,866			24,945			81,880			80,419
Costs of customer support													7,984			6,237			24,212			19,634
Sales, general and administrative	15,331			18,355			47,466			55,416			18,170			15,331			57,625			47,466
Depreciation and amortization	20,917			19,597			57,596			57,927			23,431			20,917			67,097			57,596
Goodwill impairment	—			78,169			—			78,169
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments	745			1,670			6,396			2,023			2,347			745			3,140			6,396
Total operating costs and expenses	68,175			157,338			211,511			312,253			80,798			68,175			233,954			211,511
Income (loss) from operations	732			(83,398		)	(829		)	(88,073		)	2,174			732			5,181			(829		)

Non-operating expenses:
Interest expense	12,299			7,878			37,581			22,945			16,898			12,299			47,786			37,581
Loss on foreign currency, net	197			—			485						195			197			5			485
Other, net	—			(30		)	—			442
Total non-operating expenses	12,496			7,848			38,066			23,387			17,093			12,496			47,791			38,066

Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment	(11,764		)	(91,246		)	(38,895		)	(111,460		)	(14,919		)	(11,764		)	(42,610		)	(38,895		)
Provision for income taxes	221			95			689			294			162			221			404			689
Equity in earnings of equity-method investment, net of taxes	(1,122		)	(44		)	(1,207		)	(121		)	—			(1,122		)	—			(1,207		)

Net loss	(10,863		)	(91,297		)	(38,377		)	(111,633		)	(15,081		)	(10,863		)	(43,014		)	(38,377		)
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interests	32			—			32			—			25			32			75			32
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders	(10,895		)	(91,297		)	(38,409		)	(111,633		)	(15,106		)	(10,895		)	(43,089		)	(38,409		)
Other comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(91		)	122			14			239			(98		)	(91		)	24			14
Unrealized gain on foreign currency contracts	—			(93		)	145			620			—			—			—			145
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap	—			198			—			534
Total other comprehensive income	(91		)	227			159			1,393
Total other comprehensive (loss) income													(98		)	(91		)	24			159

Comprehensive loss	$	(10,986	)	$	(91,070	)	$	(38,250	)	$	(110,240	)	$	(15,204	)	$	(10,986	)	$	(43,065	)	$	(38,250	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(1.75	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(2.14	)	$	(0.75	)	$	(0.56	)	$	(2.16	)	$	(2.04	)

Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share	79,715			52,096			74,581			52,245			20,206			19,929			19,968			18,645

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.~~See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~UNAUDITED~~ CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except par value amounts)

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,968		$	10,389		$	11,844		$	14,603
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,285 and $1,246, respectively	17,586			18,044
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,418 and $1,487, respectively							22,999			17,794
Contract assets							8,026			—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	9,036			10,055			9,497			8,673
Total current assets	38,590			38,488			52,366			41,070

Property and equipment, net	441,239			302,680			477,423			458,565
Investment in joint venture	—			3,002
Intangible assets, net	26,661			27,978			74,738			25,666
Goodwill	50,209			50,209			116,705			50,209
Non-current contract assets							12,756			—
Deposits and other assets	10,733			8,258			12,050			11,015
Total assets	$	567,432		$	430,615		$	746,038		$	586,525

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	16,732		$	20,875		$	32,243		$	20,388
Accrued liabilities	13,513			10,603			17,866			15,908
Deferred revenues	5,054			5,746			4,696			4,861
Capital lease obligations	11,729			10,030			9,399			11,711
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $2,119 and $2,243, respectively	881			757
Revolving credit facility							18,500			5,000
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $3,912 and $2,133, respectively							444			867
Exit activities and restructuring liability	4,263			3,177			3,255			4,152
Other current liabilities	3,400			3,171			3,637			1,707
Total current liabilities	55,572			54,359			90,040			64,594

Deferred revenues	4,661			5,144

Capital lease obligations	206,927			43,876			252,599			223,749
Revolving credit facility	—			35,500
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $8,216 and $4,579, respectively	288,034			283,421
Term loan, less discount and prepaid costs of $10,625 and $7,655, respectively							415,251			287,845
Exit activities and restructuring liability	1,537			1,526			162			664
Deferred rent	1,581			4,642			940			1,310
Deferred tax liability	1,484			1,513			1,952			1,651
Other long-term liabilities	3,026			4,358			4,060			7,744

Total liabilities	562,822			434,339			765,004			587,557
Commitments and contingencies (note 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000 shares authorized; 83,305 and 57,799 shares outstanding, respectively	84			58
Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 9)
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding							—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 21,302 and 20,804 shares issued and outstanding, respectively							21			21
Additional paid-in capital	1,325,755			1,283,332			1,330,751			1,327,084
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,164 and 1,073 shares, respectively	(7,145		)	(6,923		)
Treasury stock, at cost, 329 and 293, respectively							(7,645		)	(7,159		)
Accumulated deficit	(1,316,788		)	(1,278,699		)	(1,343,609		)	(1,323,723		)
Accumulated items of other comprehensive loss	(1,334		)	(1,492		)	(1,300		)	(1,324		)
Total INAP stockholders’ equity	572			(3,724		)
Total INAP stockholders’ deficit							(21,782		)	(5,101		)
Non-controlling interests	4,038			—			2,816			4,069
Total stockholders’ equity	4,610			(3,724		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	567,432		$	430,615
Total stockholders’ deficit							(18,966		)	(1,032		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit							$	746,038		$	586,525

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(43,014	)	$	(38,377	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	67,097			57,596
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed asset	(98		)	503
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs	2,798			1,890
Stock-based compensation expense, net of capitalized amount	3,573			2,061
Equity in earnings of equity-method investment	—			(1,207		)
Provision for doubtful accounts	706			808
Non-cash change in capital lease obligations	(241		)	564
Non-cash change in exit activities and restructuring liability	3,198			5,824
Non-cash change in deferred rent	(851		)	(3,335		)
Deferred taxes	65			209
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt	—			6,785
Other, net	(6		)	(49		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(4,990		)	243
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets	(3,531		)	1,979
Accounts payable	9,372			(3,498		)
Accrued and other liabilities	(601		)	1,691
Deferred revenues	617			(1,233		)
Exit activities and restructuring liability	(4,597		)	(4,727		)
Asset retirement obligation	(141		)	191
Other liabilities	(199		)	22
Net cash provided by operating activities	29,157			27,940

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(27,317		)	(23,198		)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment	570			206
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired	(131,748		)	3,838
Acquisition of non-controlling interests	(1,130		)	—
Additions to acquired and developed technology	(2,128		)	(635		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(161,753		)	(19,789		)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from credit agreements	148,500			295,500
Proceeds from stock issuance	—			40,165
Principal payments on credit agreements	(3,267		)	(327,250		)
Debt issuance costs	(7,696		)	(8,277		)
Payments on capital lease obligations	(7,202		)	(6,562		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	(210		)	159
Acquisition of common stock for income tax withholdings	(487		)	(222		)
Other, net	175			(302		)
Net cash provided by (used in) in financing activities	129,813			(6,789		)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents	24			217
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(2,759		)	1,579
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,603			10,389
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	11,844		$	11,968

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest	$	44,324		$	25,898
Non-cash acquisition of property and equipment under capital leases	33,381			169,679
Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable	4,004			701

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~UNAUDITED~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

~~(In thousands)~~

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net loss $ (38,377 ) $ (111,633 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization 57,596
57,927
Impairments 503
79,798
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs 1,890
1,881
Stock-based compensation expense, net of capitalized amount 2,061
4,717
Equity in earnings of equity-method investment (1,207 ) (121 )
Provision for doubtful accounts 808
902
Non-cash change in capital lease obligations 564
405
Non-cash change in exit activities and restructuring liability 5,824
865
Non-cash change in deferred rent (3,335 ) (1,490 )
Deferred taxes 209
158
Payment of debt lender fees (2,583 ) (1,716 )
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt 6,785

—
Other, net (49 ) 212
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable 243
1,894
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets 1,979
1,108
Accounts payable (3,498 ) 4,853
Accrued and other liabilities 1,691
(629 )
Deferred revenues (1,233 ) (304 )
Exit activities and restructuring liability (4,727 ) (2,355 )
Asset retirement obligation 191
(174 )
Other liabilities 22
(33 )
Net cash flows provided by operating activities 25,357
36,265

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Proceeds from sale of building —
542
Purchases of property and equipment (23,198 ) (38,732 )
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment 206
—
Net cash from acquisition 3,838
—
Additions to acquired and developed technology (635 ) (1,211 )
Net cash flows used in investing activities (19,789 ) (39,401 )

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Proceeds from credit agreements 295,500
4,500
Proceeds from stock issuance 40,165
—
Principal payments on credit agreements (327,250 ) (2,250 )
Debt issuance costs
(5,694 )
—
Payments on capital lease obligations (6,562 ) (7,211 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 159
675
Acquisition of common stock for income tax withholdings (222 ) (473 )
Other, net (302 ) (250 )
Net cash flows used in financing activities (4,206 ) (5,009 )
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 217
13
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,579
(8,132 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 10,389
17,772
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 11,968
$ 9,640

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid for interest $ 25,898
$ 21,957
Non-cash acquisition of property and equipment under capital leases 169,679
4,921
Additions to property and equipment included in accounts payable 701
3,606

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

~~INTERNAP CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~UNAUDITED CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


1.	NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Internap Corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” “INAP,” or “the Company”) ~~provides Internet~~is a global provider of high-performance data center services, including colocation, cloud and network. INAP partners with its customers, who range from the Fortune 500 to emerging start-ups, to create secure, scalable and reliable IT infrastructure through both Colocation Business and Enterprise Services (including colocation, network connectivity, IP, bandwidth, and managed services and hosting), and Cloud Services (including enterprise-grade AgileCLOUD, bare-metal servers, and SMB iWeb platforms).solutions that meet the customer’s unique business requirements. INAP operates in 53, primarily Tier ~~3-type~~3, data centers in 21 metropolitan markets ~~primarily in North America, with 50 datacenters~~ and ~~89 POPs~~has 102 points of presence ("POPs") around the world. ~~Currently,~~ INAP has ~~approximately one~~over 1 million gross square feet ~~under lease, with 500,000~~in its portfolio, and approximately 600,000 square feet of sellable data center space. ~~INAP operates a premium business model that provides high-power density colocation, low-latency bandwidth, and public and private cloud platforms in an expanding Internet infrastructure industry.~~

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. These financial statements include all of our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated all intercompany transactions and balances in the accompanying financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim results have been reflected therein. All such adjustments were of a normal and recurring nature with the exception of those related to the adoption of new accounting standards as discussed in Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" and Note 3, "Revenues."

We have condensed or omitted certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. ~~In the opinion of management, the~~The accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed, necessary for a fair statement of our financial position as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and our operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The balance sheet at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 was derived from our audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. You should read the accompanying financial statements and the related notes in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the ~~2017~~2018 fiscal year or any future periods.


2.	~~CHANGE IN ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE~~

2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASC 606"). This standard update, along with related subsequently issued updates, clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP. The standard update also amends current guidance for the recognition of costs to obtain and fulfill contracts with customers such that incremental costs of obtaining and direct costs of fulfilling contracts with customers will be deferred and amortized consistent with the transfer of the related good or service. ASC 606 intends to provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets; and provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Following the adoption of this guidance, the revenue recognition for our sales arrangements remained materially consistent with our historical practice. For more information, see Note 3, "Revenues."

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which states that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier adoption is permitted. We expect to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2019.

~~During~~The Company’s adoption process of the ~~three months ended March 31, 2017, we changed our organizational structure~~new standard is ongoing, including evaluating and quantifying the impact on its consolidated financial statements, identifying the population of leases (and embedded leases), implementing a selected technology solution and collecting and validating lease data. Additionally, the Company is in ~~an effort~~the process of assessing any potential impacts on the internal controls and process related to ~~create more effective~~both the implementation and ~~efficient operations and~~ongoing compliance of the new guidance. While the Company is continuing to ~~improve customer and product focus. In that regard, we revised~~assess all potential impacts of the information that our chief executive officer, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. As a result, we report our financial performance based on our revised segment structure, described in more detail in note 10 “Operating Segments.” We have reclassified prior period amounts to conformstandard, it currently believes the most significant impact relates to the recognition on the Company’s balance sheet of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all operating leases. Consistent with current ~~presentation.~~guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification. For income statement purposes, operating leases will result in a straight-line expense while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern.

The new lease standard provides entities two options for applying the modified retrospective approach (1) retrospectively to each prior ~~year reclassifications, which~~reporting period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative-effect adjustment recognized at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented or (2) retrospectively at the beginning of the period of adoption (January 1, 2019) through a cumulative-effect adjustment recognized then. The Company plans to adopt the standard by recognizing and measuring leases at the adoption date with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The Company is currently planning on electing the package of practical expedients to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs and is evaluating the other practical expedients available under the guidance.

On August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and it did not ~~affect~~have a significant impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

On January 2017, the FASB issued final guidance that revises the definition of a business, ASU No. 2017-01: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805). The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting (e.g., acquisitions, disposals, goodwill impairment, or consolidation). The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The guidance also requires a business to include at least one substantive process and narrows the definition of outputs by more closely aligning it with how outputs are described in ASC 606. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and it did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements. The guidance may have an impact on the Company as it pursues its strategy to develop its business.

On May 2017, the FASB issued guidance ASU No. 2017-09: Scope of Modification Accounting (Topic 718), to clarify when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and it did not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements.

3. REVENUES

Upon adoption of ASC 606, the Company applied certain transition practical expedients available for modified retrospective adoption.

The Company adopted the practical expedient for the portfolio approach of contracts with similar characteristics in which the Company reasonably expects that the effects on the financial statements of applying this practical expedient to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying this guidance to the individual contracts (or performance obligations) within that portfolio.

The Company also adopted the practical expedient to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less, (ii) contracts for which INAP recognizes revenue at the amount to which the Company has the right to invoice for services performed, and (iii) the value for variable consideration that is applied to individual performance obligations in a series.

The Company elected to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by the entity from a customer (e.g., sales, use, and value added taxes).

Changes in Accounting Policies

The most significant impact of the adoption of the new standard is the requirement for incremental costs to obtain a customer, such as commissions, which previously were expensed as incurred, to be deferred and amortized over the period of contract performance or a longer period if renewals are expected and the renewal commission is not commensurate with the initial commission.

In addition, installation revenues are recognized over the initial contract life rather than over the estimated customer life, as they are not significant to the total contract and therefore do not represent a material right.

Most performance obligations, with the exception of certain sales of equipment or hardware, are satisfied over time as the customer consumes the benefits as we perform. For equipment and hardware sales, the performance obligation is satisfied when control transfers to the customer.

In evaluating the treatment of certain contracts, the Company exercised heightened judgment in deferring installation revenue as well as expense fulfillment and commission costs over the appropriate life. With the exception of the revenues ~~total direct costs~~noted above, revenue recognition remains materially consistent with historical practice. However, our approach did not result in any material differences to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Adjustments to Reported Financial Statements from the Adoption

The following table presents the effect of ~~sales~~the adoption of ASC 606 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2018 (in thousands):



	December 31, 2017, as reported			Adjustments			January 1, 2018, as adjusted
ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	8,673		$	6,814		$	15,487
Deposits and other assets	11,015			11,234			22,249

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Deferred revenues	4,861			(749		)	4,112
Deferred tax liability	1,651			209			1,860
Other long-term liabilities	7,744			(4,616		)	3,128
Accumulated deficit	(1,323,723		)	23,204			(1,300,519		)

Current Impact from the Adoption

In accordance with the new revenue standard requirements, the disclosure of the current period impact of adoption on our

condensed consolidated statement of operations and ~~services, operating~~comprehensive loss ~~or net loss, are summarized~~and balance sheet is as follows (in ~~thousands)~~thousands, except for per share amounts):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

As Previously
Reported
Reclassification As Reported
Revenues:

Data center and network services $ 49,767
$ (49,767 ) $ —
Cloud and hosting services 24,173
(24,173 ) —
INAP COLO —
54,998
54,998
INAP CLOUD —
18,942
18,942
Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:

Data center and network services 25,042
(25,042 ) —
Cloud and hosting services 6,520
(6,520 ) —
INAP COLO —
26,676
26,676
INAP CLOUD —
4,886
4,886



	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
	As Reported			Balances without Adoption of ASC 606			Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)
Net revenues	$	82,972		$	82,822		$	150

Sales, general and administrative	18,170			18,100			70
Total operating costs and expenses	80,798			80,728			70
Income from operations	2,174			2,094			80

Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment	(14,919		)	(14,999		)	80

Net loss	(15,081		)	(15,161		)	80
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest	25			25			—
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders	(15,106		)	(15,186		)	80

Comprehensive loss	$	(15,204	)	$	(15,186	)	$	80

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

As Previously
Reported
Reclassification As Reported
Revenues:

Data center and network services $ 151,099

$ (151,099 )
$ —
Cloud and hosting services 73,081

(73,081 )
—
INAP COLO —

166,707

166,707
INAP CLOUD —

57,473

57,473
Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:

Data center and network services 74,065
(74,065 ) —
Cloud and hosting services 19,944
(19,944 ) —
INAP COLO $ —
79,745
79,745
INAP CLOUD $ —
14,264
14,264



	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
	As Reported			Balances without Adoption of ASC 606			Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)
Net revenues	$	239,135		$	238,539		$	596

Sales, general and administrative	57,625			57,671			(46		)
Total operating costs and expenses	233,954			234,000			(46		)
Income from operations	5,181			4,539			642

Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment	(42,610		)	(43,252		)	642

Net loss	(43,014		)	(43,656		)	642
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest	75			75			—
Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders	(43,089		)	(43,731		)	642

Comprehensive loss	$	(43,065	)	$	(43,707	)	$	642



	September 30, 2018
	As Reported			Balances without Adoption of ASC 606			Effect of Change Higher/ (Lower)
ASSETS
Contract assets	$	8,026		$	8,022		$	4
Non-current contract assets	12,756			12,756			—

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Deferred revenues	4,696			4,771			(75		)
Other long-term liabilities	4,060			4,060			—
Accumulated deficit	(1,343,609		)	(1,343,534		)	(75		)

Adoption of ASC 606 did not have a significant impact on the Company's condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC 606. Revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations of products and services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations.

The Company’s contracts with customers often include performance obligations to transfer multiple products and services to a customer. Common performance obligations of the Company include delivery of services, which are discussed in more detail below. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together requires significant judgment by the Company.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in ASC 606. A contracts transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. Total transaction price is estimated for impact of variable consideration, such as INAP’s service level arrangements, additional usage and late fees, discounts and promotions, and customer care credits. The majority of our contracts have multiple performance obligations, as the promise to transfer individual goods or services is separately identifiable

from other promises in the contracts and, therefore, is distinct. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contract's transaction price to each performance obligation based on its relative stand-alone selling price.

The stand-alone selling price (“SSP”) is determined based on observable price. In instances where the SSP is not directly observable, such as when the Company does not sell the product or service separately, INAP determines the SSP using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs. The Company typically has more than one SSP for individual products and services due to the stratification of those products and services by customers and circumstances. In these instances, the Company may use information such as the size of the customer and geographic region in determining the SSP.

Revenue by source, with sales and usage-based taxes excluded, is as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018				Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	INAP US		INAP INTL		INAP US		INAP INTL
Colocation	$	32,946	$	1,372	$	29,114	$	1,166
Network services	13,015		2,719		14,486		2,281
Cloud	19,717		13,203		9,370		12,490
	$	65,678	$	17,294	$	52,970	$	15,937



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	INAP US		INAP INTL		INAP US		INAP INTL
Colocation	$	94,747	$	4,349	$	88,740	$	3,745
Network services	40,398		8,482		45,108		5,329
Cloud	51,676		39,483		28,696		39,064
	$	186,821	$	52,314	$	162,544	$	48,138

Revenue by geography is as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018				Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	INAP US		INAP INTL		INAP US		INAP INTL
United States	$	66,825	$	—	$	54,006	$	—
Canada	—		9,187		—		9,421
Other countries	—		6,960		—		5,480
	$	66,825	$	16,147	$	54,006	$	14,901



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	INAP US		INAP INTL		INAP US		INAP INTL
United States	$	190,071	$	—	$	165,757	$	—
Canada	—		27,846		—		29,320
Other countries	—		21,218		—		15,605
	$	190,071	$	49,064	$	165,757	$	44,925

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, revenue recognized that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of each year was $1.7 million.

Management expects that fulfillment costs and commission fees paid to sales representatives as a result of obtaining service contracts and contract renewals are recoverable and therefore the Company capitalized them as contract costs in the amount of $28.6 million at September 30, 2018. Capitalized fulfillment and commission fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the determined life, which vary based on the customer segment. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, amortization recognized was $3.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively. There was no impairment loss recorded on capitalized contract costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Applying the practical expedient pertaining to contract costs, the Company recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. These costs are included in "Sales, general and administrative" expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

4. ACQUISITION

On February 28, 2018, the Company acquired SingleHop LLC ("SingleHop"), a provider of high-performance data center services including colocation, managed hosting, cloud and network services for $132.0 million net of working capital adjustments, liabilities assumed, and net of cash acquired. The transaction was funded with an incremental term loan and cash from the balance sheet. As part of the financing, INAP obtained an amendment to its credit agreement to allow for the incremental term loan and to provide further operational flexibility under the credit agreement covenants. The amendments to the credit agreement are described in more detail in Note 7, "Debt."

The following table summarizes the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and reflects purchase accounting adjustments subsequent to the acquisition date (in thousands):



	Preliminary Valuation as of March 31, 2018		Measurement Period Adjustments			Preliminary Valuation as of September 30, 2018
Cash	$	2,857	$	(34	)	$	2,823
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,683		544			2,227
Property, plant and equipment	14,885		—			14,885
Other long term assets	39		537			576
Intangible assets:
Noncompete agreements	4,000		—			4,000
Trade names	1,700		—			1,700
Technology	15,100		—			15,100
Customer relationships	34,100		—			34,100
Goodwill	67,868		(1,372		)	66,496
Total assets acquired	142,232		(325		)	141.907
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	5,098		(224		)	4,874
Deferred revenue	1,600		(101		)	1,499
Long term liabilities	534		—			534
Net assets acquired	$	135,000	$	—		$	135,000

The above estimated fair values of consideration transferred, assets acquired and liabilities assumed are provisional and are based on the information that was available as of the acquisition date. Measurement period adjustments reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. The measurement period adjustments primarily related to working capital and ASC 606. The Company believes that information provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Thus, the preliminary measurements of fair value set forth above maybe subject to change. The Company is in the process of finalizing the fair value adjustments. The Company expects to finalize the valuation as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.

The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management. The intangible assets are being amortized over periods which reflect the pattern in which economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized. The customer relationships are being amortized on an accelerated basis over an estimated useful life of ten years and the noncompete agreements, trade names, and technology are being amortized on a straight-line basis over four, eight, and seven years, respectively.

Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the aggregate fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition was based on operating synergies and other benefits expected to result from the combined operations and the assembled workforce acquired. The goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisition-related costs recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 including transaction costs such as legal, accounting, valuation and other professional services, were $2.9 million and are included in "Sales, general and administrative" expenses on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of INAP and SingleHop as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2017. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of our consolidated results of operations that would have been reported had the INAP and SingleHop acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2017, and should not be taken as indicative of our future consolidated results of operations. The pro forma results are as follows (in thousands except for per share amounts):



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenues	$	82,972		$	80,622		$	247,260		$	246,622
Net loss	(15,081		)	(11,708		)	(44,216		)	(39,817		)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	(0.75		)	(0.59		)	(2.22		)	(2.14		)
Weighted average shares outstanding used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share	20,206			19,929			19,968			18,645


3.	~~FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS~~

5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. We categorize each of our fair value measurements in one of these three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
September 30, 2017

Foreign currency contracts (note 8) $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
Asset retirement obligations(1) —
—
3,157
3,157

December 31, 2016

Foreign currency contracts (note 8) —
195
—
195
Asset retirement obligations(1) —
—
2,810
2,810



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
September 30, 2018
Asset retirement obligations⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	1,813	$	1,813

December 31, 2017
Asset retirement obligations⁽¹⁾	—		—		1,936		1,936

⁽¹⁾

We ~~calculate~~calculated the fair value of asset retirement obligations by discounting the estimated amount using the current Treasury bill rate adjusted for our credit risk. ~~The~~At September 30, 2018, the balance is included in “Other long-term liabilities,” in the accompanying ~~unaudited consolidated balance sheets.~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2017, $0.2 million and $1.7 million were included in "Other current liabilities" and "Other long-term liabilities," respectively, in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table provides a summary of changes in our Level 3 asset retirement obligations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 (in thousands):

Balance, January 1, 2017 $ 2,810
Accretion 155
Subsequent revision of estimated obligation 449
Payments (415 )
Aquisition of Internap Japan 158
Balance, September 30, 2017 $ 3,157



Balance, January 1, 2018	$	1,936
Accretion	127
Payments	(250		)
Balance, September 30, 2018	$	1,813

The fair values of our ~~other~~ Level 32 debt liabilities, ~~estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis~~ based ~~on incremental borrowing rates~~upon quoted prices for similar ~~types of borrowing arrangements,~~items in active markets, are as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016				September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Term loan	$	299,250	$	302,242	$	291,000	$	267,700	$	430,232	$	433,998	$	298,500	$	301,485
Revolving credit facility	—		—		35,500		32,600		18,500		18,662		5,000		5,050


4.	~~GOODWILL~~

6. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

General

The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually in the third quarter. Additionally, the Company may perform interim tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that could potentially reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite lived intangible asset below its carrying amount. The carrying value of each reporting unit is determined by assigning the assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units.

The Company tests goodwill for impairment by either performing a qualitative evaluation or a quantitative test. The qualitative evaluation is an assessment of factors, including reporting unit specific operating results as well as industry, market and general economic conditions, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company may elect to bypass this qualitative assessment for some or all of its reporting units and perform a quantitative test.

Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying amount of the net assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. Impairment, if any, would be recorded in operating income / (loss) and this could result in a material impact to net income / (loss) and income / (loss) per share.

In 2017, the Company adopted the new guidance under ASU No. 2017-04: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350) which eliminated step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which required a hypothetical purchase price allocation to measure goodwill impairment loss as of January 1, 2018. A goodwill impairment loss under the new guidance is instead measured using a single step test based on the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. Based on the Company’s impairment test, no impairments were noted.

Annual Testing

2018

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March 31, 2017,~~September 30, 2018, we changed our operating segments, as discussed in ~~note~~Note 10, “Operating Segments,” and, subsequently, our reporting units. We now have ~~six~~seven reporting units: ~~IP services, IP products, data center services, managed hosting, cloud~~US Colocation, US Cloud, US Network, INTL Colocation, INTL Cloud, INTL Network, and Ubersmith. We allocated goodwill to our new reporting units using a relative fair value approach. In addition, we completed an assessment of any potential goodwill impairment for all reporting units immediately prior to and after the reallocation and determined that no impairment existed.

We performed our annual impairment review as of August 1, 2018. To determine the estimated fair value of our reporting units, we utilized the discounted cash flow and market methods. We have consistently utilized both methods in our goodwill impairment assessments and weighted both as appropriate based on relevant factors for each reporting unit. The discounted cash flow method is specific to our anticipated future results of the reporting unit, while the market method is based on our market sector including our competitors.

We determined the assumptions supporting the discounted cash flow method, including the discount rate, using our estimates as of the date of the impairment review. To determine the reasonableness of these assumptions, we considered our past performance and empirical trending of results, looked to market and industry expectations used in the discounted cash flow method, such as forecasted revenues and discount rate. We used reasonable judgment in developing our estimates and assumptions. The market

method estimates fair value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings derived from comparable companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting unit.

The assumptions, inputs and judgments used in performing the valuation analysis are inherently subjective and reflect estimates based on known facts and circumstances at the time we perform the valuation. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, discount rates; terminal growth rates; projected revenues and costs; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for expected cash flows; market comparables and capital expenditure forecasts. The use of different assumptions, inputs and judgments, or changes in circumstances, could materially affect the results of the valuation. Due to inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual results could differ from our estimates and could result in additional non-cash impairment charges in the future.

The Company determined, after performing the fair value analysis above, that all reporting units’ fair values were in excess of its carrying value. No impairment of goodwill has been identified for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, we re-allocated~~2018, our goodwill activity is as follows (in thousands):


	December 31, 2016		Re-allocations			September 30, 2017		December 31, 2017		Re-allocations			SingleHop Acquisition (Note 4)		September 30, 2018
Operating segments:
Data center and network services	$	—	$	—		$	—
Cloud and hosting services	50,209		(50,209		)	—
INAP COLO	—		6,003			6,003		$	6,003	$	(6,003	)	$	—	$	—
INAP CLOUD	—		44,206			44,206		44,206		(44,206		)	—		—
INAP US								—		28,304			66,496		94,800
INAP INTL								—		21,905			—		21,905
Total	$	50,209	$	—		$	50,209	$	50,209	$	—		$	66,496	$	116,705

Other Intangible Assets


5.	~~DEBT~~

~~Third Amendment~~The components of our amortizing intangible assets, including capitalized software, are as follows (in thousands):



	September 30, 2018					December 31, 2017
	Gross Carrying Amount		AccumulatedAmortization			Gross Carrying Amount		AccumulatedAmortization
Acquired and developed technology	$	70,201	$	(50,997	)	$	52,825	$	(48,063	)
Customer relationships, trade names and noncompete	110,774		(55,240		)	71,116		(50,212		)
	$	180,975	$	(106,237	)	$	123,941	$	(98,275	)

During the three months ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2018 and 2017, ~~we entered into an amendment to our Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”), which, among other things, amended the credit agreement (i) to make each of the interest coverage ratio~~amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $3.2 million and ~~leverage ratio covenants less restrictive~~$1.8 million, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets was approximately $8.0 million and ~~(ii) to decrease the maximum level of permitted capital expenditures. We paid a one-time aggregate fee of $2.6~~$4.0 million ~~to the lenders~~ for the ~~Third Amendment, which we recorded~~nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As of September 30, 2018, remaining amortization expense is as a debt discount of $2.2 million related to the term loan and prepaid debt issuance costs of $0.4 million related to the revolving credit facility. In addition, we paid $0.3 million in third-party fees, which we recorded as expense of $0.3 million related to the term loan and as prepaid debt issuance costs of less than $0.1 million related to the revolving credit facility.follows (in thousands):

The Third Amendment was effective on February 28, 2017, upon the closing of the equity sale, which is described in note 6 "Equity" below. The effectiveness of the covenant amendments was conditioned on the Company completing one or more equity offerings on or before June 30, 2017 for gross cash proceeds of not less than $40 million, and net cash proceeds of not less than $37 million and the application of the net cash proceeds to the repayment of indebtedness under the Credit Agreement. The Company paid a fee of approximately $0.9 million to the lenders on January 26, 2017 and paid an additional fee of $1.6 million on February 28, 2017. Absent the Third Amendment, we may not have been able to comply with our covenants in the Credit Agreement.



Three months remaining in 2018	$	3,598
2019	13,961
2020	13,394
2021	11,210
2022	8,251
2023	7,747
Thereafter	16,577
Total	$	74,738

7. DEBT

Credit Agreement

On April 6, 2017, we entered into a new Credit Agreement (the “2017 Credit Agreement”), which provides for a ~~$300~~$300.0 million term loan facility ("2017 term loan") and a ~~$25~~$25.0 million revolving credit facility ("(the "2017 revolving credit facility"). The proceeds of the 2017 term loan were used to refinance the Company’s existing credit facility and to pay costs and expenses associated with the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Certain portions of refinancing transaction were considered an extinguishment of debt and certain portions were considered a modification. A total of $5.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the 2017 Credit Agreement. Of the $5.7 million in costs paid, $1.9 million related to the exchange of debt and was expensed, $3.3 million related to term loan third party costs and will be amortized over the term of the loan and $0.4 million ~~are~~ prepaid debt issuance costs related to the 2017 revolving credit facility and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 revolving credit facility. In addition, $4.8 million of debt discount and debt issuance costs related to the previous credit facility were expensed due to the extinguishment of that credit facility.

The maturity date of the 2017 term loan is April 6, 2022 and the maturity date of the 2017 revolving credit facility is October 6, 2021. As of September 30, 2018, the balance of the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was $430.2 million and $18.5 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2018, the interest rate on the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was ~~8.24%.~~7.90% and 9.25%, respectively.

Borrowings under the 2017 Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable margin plus, at our option, a base rate or an adjusted LIBOR rate. The applicable margin for loans under the 2017 revolving credit facility is 7.0% for loans bearing interest calculated using the base rate (“Base Rate Loans”) and 6.0% for loans bearing interest calculated using the adjusted LIBOR rate. The applicable margin for loans under the 2017 term loan is 5.75% for Base Rate Loans and 4.75% for adjusted LIBOR rate loans. The base rate is equal to the highest of (a) the adjusted U.S. Prime Lending Rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, (b) with respect to term loans issued on the closing date, 2.00%, (c) the federal funds effective rate from time to time, plus 0.50%, and (d) the adjusted LIBOR rate, as defined below, for a one-month interest period, plus 1.00%. The adjusted LIBOR rate is equal to the rate per annum (adjusted for statutory reserve requirements for Eurocurrency liabilities) at which Eurodollar deposits are offered in the interbank Eurodollar market for the applicable interest period (one, two, three or six months), as quoted on Reuters screen LIBOR (or any successor page or service). The financing commitments of the lenders extending the 2017 revolving credit facility are subject to various conditions, as set forth in the 2017 Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2018, the Company has been in compliance with all covenants.

First Amendment

On June 28, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the 2017 Credit Agreement (“First Amendment”), by and among the Company, each of the lenders party thereto, and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent. The First Amendment clarified that for all purposes the Company’s liabilities pursuant to any lease that was treated as rental and lease expense, and not as a capital lease obligation or indebtedness on the closing date of the 2017 Credit Agreement, would continue to be treated as a rental and lease expense, and not as a capital lease obligations or indebtedness, for all purposes of the 2017 Credit Agreement, notwithstanding any amendment of the lease that results in the treatment of such lease as a capital lease obligation or indebtedness for financial reporting purposes.

Second Amendment

On February 6, 2018, the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) that amended the 2017 Credit Agreement.

The Second Amendment, among other things, amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to (i) permit the Company to incur incremental term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement of up to $135.0 million to finance the Company’s acquisition of SingleHop and to pay related fees, costs and expenses, and (ii) revise the maximum total net leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio covenants. The financial covenant amendments became effective upon the consummation of the SingleHop acquisition, while the other provisions of the Second Amendment became effective upon the execution and delivery of the Second Amendment. This transaction was considered a modification.

A total of $1.0 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Second Amendment. Of the $1.0 million in costs paid, $0.2 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $0.8 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement.


6.	~~EQUITY~~

~~Securities Purchase Agreement~~Third Amendment

On February ~~22,~~28, 2018, INAP entered into the Incremental and Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Third Amendment”).�� The Third Amendment provides for a new incremental term loan facility under the 2017 Credit Agreement of $135.0 million (the “Incremental Term Loan”). The Incremental Term Loan has terms and conditions identical to the existing loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement, as amended. Proceeds of the Incremental Term Loan were used to complete the acquisition of SingleHop and to pay fees, costs and expenses related to the acquisition, the Third Amendment and the Incremental Term Loan. This transaction was considered a modification.

A total of $5.0 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Third Amendment. Of the $5.0 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $4.9 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Fourth Amendment

On April 9, 2018, the Company entered into ~~a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain purchasers (the “Purchasers”), pursuant~~the Fourth Amendment to ~~which~~2017 Credit Agreement, among the Company, ~~issued~~the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fourth Amendment”). The Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to lower the interest rate margins applicable to the ~~Purchasers an aggregate~~outstanding term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement by 1.25%.

In addition, the Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement such that if the Company incurs a “Repricing Event” (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement), before October 9, 2018, then the Company will incur a 1.00% prepayment premium on any term loans that are subject to such Repricing Event. This transaction was considered a modification.

A total of ~~23,802,850 shares~~$1.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the Fourth Amendment. Of the $1.7 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to the payment of legal and professional fees which were expensed, $1.6 million related to term loan lender fees and will be amortized over the term of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.81 per share, for the aggregate purchase price of $43.1 million, which closed on February 27, 2017. Conditions for the Securities Purchase Agreement included the following: (i) a requirement for the Company to use the funds of the sale of such common stock to repay indebtedness under the2017 Credit Agreement, (ii) a 90-day “lock-up” period whereby the Company is restricted from certain sales of equity securities and (iii) a requirement for the Company to pay certain transaction expenses of the Purchasers up to $100,000. The Company used $39.2 million of the proceeds to pay down our debt, as described in note 5, "Debt" above.Agreement.

~~Registration Rights Agreement~~

Fifth Amendment

On ~~February 22, 2017,~~August 28, 2018, the Company entered into ~~a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with~~ the ~~Purchasers, which provides the Purchasers under the Securities Purchase~~Fifth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, ~~the ability to request registration of such securities. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement,~~among the Company, ~~filed a registration statement in March~~the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fifth Amendment”). The Fifth Amendment amended the 2017 ~~that was declared effective during April 2017.~~

Credit Agreement by increasing the aggregate revolving commitment capacity by $10.0 million to $35.0 million.


7.	~~EXIT ACTIVITIES AND RESTRUCTURING LIABILITIES~~

8. EXIT ACTIVITIES AND RESTRUCTURING LIABILITIES

During ~~the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2017 and 2018, we recorded ~~initial~~ exit activity charges due to ceasing use of ~~data center~~office space. We include initial charges and plan adjustments in “Exit activities, restructuring and impairments” in the accompanying ~~statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss~~Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.

The following table displays the transactions and balances for exit activities and restructuring charges during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 (in thousands). Our real estate and severance obligations are substantially related to our INAP ~~COLO~~US segment. ~~Severance is spread across both reportable segments.~~

Balance December 31, 2016
Initial
Charges

Plan
Adjustments

Cash
Payments
Balance September 30, 2017
Activity for 2017 restructuring charge:

Real estate obligations $ —
$ 4,024
$ 654
$ (881 ) $ 3,797
Activity for 2016 restructuring charge:

Severance 1,911
—
958
(2,467 ) 402
Real estate obligations 933
—
76
(730 ) 279
Activity for 2015 restructuring charge:

Real estate obligation 111
—
2
(38 ) 75
Service contracts 565
—
15
(148 ) 432
Activity for 2014 restructuring charge:

Real estate obligation 1,183
—
95
(463 ) 815
$ 4,703
$ 4,024
$ 1,800
$ (4,727 ) $ 5,800


	Balance December 31, 2015		Initial Charges		Plan Adjustments			Cash Payments			Balance September 30, 2016		Balance									Balance
													December 31, 2017		Initial Charges		Plan Adjustments		Cash Payments			September 30, 2018
Activity for 2018 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligations													$	—	$	1,821	$	902	$	(961	)	$	1,762
Activity for 2017 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligations													3,380		—		220		(2,747		)	853
Activity for 2016 restructuring charge:
Severance													46		—		35		(35		)	46
Real estate obligations	$	—	$	197	$	12		$	(149	)	$	60	247		—		29		(122		)	154
Service contracts	—		42		(21		)	(21		)	—
Activity for 2015 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligation	164		—		(10		)	(37		)	117		64		—		8		(36		)	36
Service contracts	843		—		5			(238		)	610		388		—		22		(148		)	262
Activity for 2014 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligations	1,701		—		85			(474		)	1,312
Activity for 2007 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligation	1,170		—		555			(1,436		)	289		691		—		161		(548		)	304
	$	3,878	$	239	$	626		$	(2,355	)	$	2,388	$	4,816	$	1,821	$	1,377	$	(4,597	)	$	3,417



	Balance									Balance
	December 31, 2016		Initial Charges		Plan Adjustments		Cash Payments			September 30, 2017
Activity for 2017 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligations	$	—	$	4,024	$	654	$	(881	)	$	3,797
Activity for 2016 restructuring charge:
Severance	1,911		—		958		(2,467		)	402
Real estate obligations	933		—		76		(730		)	279
Activity for 2015 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligation	111		—		2		(38		)	75
Service contracts	565		—		15		(148		)	432
Activity for 2014 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligation	1,183		—		95		(463		)	815
	$	4,703	$	4,024	$	1,800	$	(4,727	)	$	5,800


8.	~~DERIVATIVES~~

~~Foreign Currency Contracts~~

In a prior year we entered into foreign currency contracts to mitigate the risk of a portion of our Canadian compensation expense. These contracts hedged foreign exchange variations between the United States and Canadian dollar and committed us to purchase a total of $12.0 million Canadian dollars at an exchange rate of 1.2855 through June 2017. The contract expired on June 30, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the fair value of our foreign currency contracts was $0.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, included in “Other current liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

~~The activity of the foreign currency contracts was as follows (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017
2016 2017
2016
Unrealized gain, net of less than $0.1 million income tax, included in “Accumulated items of other comprehensive loss” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets $ —

$ 75
$ 145

$ 713
Realized loss on effective portion, included as compensation expense in “Direct costs of customer support” and “Sales, general and administrative” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss —

(20 ) (171 )
(199 )


9.	9. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LITIGATION

~~Capital Leases~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we entered into amended agreements for data center space. The lease extensions triggered new lease agreements, with new terms resulting in capital lease treatment for accounting purposes. We recorded property of $169.4 million, net of the deferred rent balance on the previous operating leases, included in "Property and equipment, net" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and capital lease obligations of $172.0 million.

~~As of September 30, 2017, future minimum capital lease payments and the present value of the minimum lease payments for all capital leases are as follows (in thousands):~~

2017 $7,530
2018 31,062
2019 28,546
2020 24,432
2021 23,970
Thereafter 365,284
Remaining capital lease payments 480,824
Less: amounts representing imputed interest (262,168 )
Present value of minimum lease payments 218,656
Less: current portion (11,729 )
$206,927

~~Litigation~~

We are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


~~10.~~	~~OPERATING SEGMENTS~~

10. OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable segments: INAP ~~COLO~~US and INAP ~~CLOUD.~~INTL. These segments are comprised of strategic businesses that are defined by the location of the service ~~offerings they provide.~~ offerings. Our INAP US segment consists of US Colocation, US Cloud, and US Network services based in the United States. Our INAP INTL segment consists of these same services based in countries other than the United States, and Ubersmith.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we changed our organizational structure in an effort to create more effective and efficient operations and to improve customer and product focus. In that regard, we revised the information that our chief executive officer, who is also our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. As a result, we report our financial performance based on our revised segment structure. We have reclassified prior period amounts to conform to the current presentation.

The prior year reclassifications, which did not affect total revenues, total costs of sales and services, operating loss or net loss, are summarized as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	As Previously Reported		Reclassification			As Reported
Revenues:
INAP COLO	$	51,344	$	(51,344	)	$	—
INAP CLOUD	17,563		(17,563		)	—
INAP US	—		52,970			52,970
INAP INTL	—		15,937			15,937
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:
INAP COLO	$	20,785	$	(20,785	)	$	—
INAP CLOUD	4,160		(4,160		)	—
INAP US	—		18,906			18,906
INAP INTL	—		6,039			6,039



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	As Previously Reported		Reclassification			As Reported
Revenues:
INAP COLO	$	156,727	$	(156,727	)	$	—
INAP CLOUD	53,955		(53,955		)	—
INAP US	—		162,544			162,544
INAP INTL	—		48,138			48,138
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:
INAP COLO	$	67,661	$	(67,661	)	$	—
INAP CLOUD	12,758		(12,758		)	—
INAP US	—		63,589			63,589
INAP INTL	—		16,830			16,830

Each segment is managed as an operation with well-established strategic directions and performance requirements. Each segment is led by a separate General Manager who reports directly to the Company’s CODM.

The CODM evaluates segment performance using business unit contribution which is defined as business unit revenues less direct costs of sales and services, customer support, and sales and marketing, exclusive of depreciation and amortization.

~~We report~~Our services, which are included within both our ~~financial performance based on our two~~ reportable segments, ~~INAP COLO and INAP CLOUD,~~are described as follows:

~~INAP COLO~~

~~Our Colocation segment consists of colocation, managed services and hosting, and network services.~~

Colocation

Colocation involves providing conditioned power with back-up capacity and physical space within data centers ~~and~~along with associated services such as ~~power,~~ interconnection, remote hands, environmental controls, monitoring and security while allowing our customers to deploy and manage their servers, storage and other equipment in our secure data centers. We design the data center infrastructure, procure the capital equipment, deploy the infrastructure and are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the facility.

Cloud

~~Managed Services~~Cloud services involve providing compute resources and ~~Hosting~~

~~Managed Services and Hosting consists of leasing dedicated servers as well as~~ storage ~~and network equipment along with other associated hardware to~~services on demand via an integrated platform that includes our ~~customers. We configure and administer the hardware and operating system, provide technical support, patch management, monitoring and updates.~~automated bare metal solutions. We offer ~~managed hosting around~~our next generation cloud platforms in our high density colocation facilities and utilize the ~~globe, including North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.~~INAP performance IP for low latency connectivity.

Network ~~Services~~

Network services includes our patented Performance IP™ service, content delivery network services, IP routing hardware and software ~~platform and Managed Internet Route Optimizer™ Controller.~~platform. By intelligently routing traffic with redundant, high-speed

connections over multiple, major Internet backbones, our ~~network services~~IP connectivity provides high-performance and highly-reliable delivery of content, applications and communications to end users globally. We deliver our IP connectivity through 102 POPs around the world.

~~INAP CLOUD~~

Cloud services involve providing compute and storage services via an integrated platform that includes servers, storage and network. We built our next generation cloud platform with our high-density colocation, Performance IP service and OpenStack, a leading open source technology for cloud services.

In conjunction with our change in segments we changed the measure for determining the results of our segments to business unit contribution which includes the direct costs of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing, exclusive of depreciation and amortization. In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2017, management changed its measure of profitability to exclude corporate facilities allocation cost which are now reflected in "Sales, general and administrative," in the accompanying consolidated income statements.

The following table provides segment results with prior period amounts reclassified to conform to the current presentation (in thousands):

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues:

INAP COLO $ 51,344
$ 54,998
$ 156,727
$ 166,707
INAP CLOUD 17,563
18,942
53,955
57,473
Total revenues 68,907
73,940
210,682
224,180

Direct costs of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:

INAP COLO 29,048
35,893
92,524
108,219
INAP CLOUD 9,094
10,329
27,969
31,673
Total direct costs of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing 38,142
46,222
120,493
139,892

Business unit contribution:

INAP COLO 22,296
19,105
64,203
58,488
INAP CLOUD 8,469
8,613
25,986
25,800
Total business unit contribution 30,765
27,718
90,189
84,288

Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 745
1,670
6,396
2,023
Other operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization 29,288
109,446
84,622
170,338
Loss from operations 732
(83,398 ) (829 ) (88,073 )
Non-operating expenses 12,496
7,848
38,066
23,387
Loss before income taxes and equity in (earnings) of equity-method investment $ (11,764 ) $ (91,246 ) $ (38,895 ) $ (111,460 )



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenues:
INAP US	$	65,678		$	52,970		$	186,821		$	162,544
INAP INTL	17,294			15,937			52,314			48,138
Net revenues	82,972			68,907			239,135			210,682

Cost of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing:
INAP US	35,842			29,600			101,252			97,832
INAP INTL	11,478			9,874			34,483			27,339
Total costs of sales and services, customer support and sales and marketing	47,320			39,474			135,735			125,171

Segment profit:
INAP US	29,836			23,370			85,569			64,712
INAP INTL	5,816			6,063			17,831			20,799
Total segment profit	35,652			29,433			103,400			85,511

Exit activities, restructuring and impairments	2,347			745			3,140			6,396
Other operating expenses, including sales, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expenses	31,131			27,956			95,079			79,944
Income (loss) from operations	2,174			732			5,181			(829		)
Non-operating expenses	17,093			12,496			47,791			38,066
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of equity-method investment	$	(14,919	)	$	(11,764	)	$	(42,610	)	$	(38,895	)

The CODM does not manage the operating segments based on asset allocations. Therefore, assets by operating segment have not been provided.


~~11.~~	~~NET LOSS PER SHARE~~

11. NET LOSS PER SHARE

We compute basic net loss per share by dividing net loss attributable to our common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. We exclude all outstanding options and unvested restricted stock as such securities are anti-dilutive for all periods presented.

Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss	$	(10,863	)	$	(91,297	)	$	(38,377	)	$	(111,633	)	$	(15,081	)	$	(10,863	)	$	(43,014	)	$	(38,377	)
Less net income attributable to non-controlling stockholders	$	32		$	—		$	32		$	—
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interests													25			32			75			32
Net loss attributable to common stock	$	(10,895	)	$	(91,297	)	$	(38,409	)	$	(111,633	)	$	(15,106	)	$	(10,895	)	$	(43,089	)	$	(38,409	)
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted	79,715			52,096			74,581			52,245			20,206			19,929			19,968			18,645

Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.14	)	$	(1.75	)	$	(0.51	)	$	(2.14	)	$	(0.75	)	$	(0.56	)	$	(2.16	)	$	(2.04	)
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from diluted net loss per share calculation for stock-based compensation plans	5,840			7,238			5,840			7,238			1,065			1,460			1,065			1,460


~~12.~~	~~ACQUISITION~~

In previous years, INAP invested $4.1 million in Internap Japan Co., Ltd. ("Interap Japan"), our joint venture with NTT-ME Corporation and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation. We accounted for this investment using the equity method. On August 15, 2017, INAP exercised certain rights to obtain a controlling interest in Internap Japan. Upon obtaining control of the venture, we recognized Internap Japan's assets and liabilities at fair value resulting in a gain of $1.1 million which is reflected in "Equity in earnings of equity-method investment, net of taxes" in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

~~Pro-Forma Financial Information~~

~~The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents~~On October 23, 2018, the ~~combined results~~Company closed a public offering of ~~operations~~4,210,527 shares of ~~INAP~~common stock at $9.50 per share to the public and ~~Internap Japan~~received from the underwriter net proceeds of $36.6 million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions, and other offering expenses). We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 631,579 additional shares of common stock on the same terms and conditions as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2016. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of our consolidated results of operations that would have been reported hadshares offered in the ~~INAP and Internap Japan acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2016, and should not be taken as indicative of our future consolidated results of operations.~~

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenue $ 70,029
$ 76,124
$ 215,741
$ 230,132
Net loss (10,849 ) (91,269 ) (38,317 ) (111,572 )
public offering.


~~13.~~	~~RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS~~

~~Adoption of New Accounting Standards~~

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment" ("ASU 2017-04"), which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating “Step 2” from the goodwill impairment test. The guidance is effective for public companies’ annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We adopted ASU 2017-04 in the first quarter of 2017 and it did not impact our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory ("ASU 2016-16"), which allows the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. Historically, recognition of the income tax consequence was not recognized until the asset was sold to an outside party. This guidance should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. There are no new disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, and the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-16 as of January 1, 2017. In connection with

~~the adoption of the standard, the Company recorded a $2.2 million deferred tax asset and corresponding $1.9 million valuation allowance with the net difference going to retained earnings.~~

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), which includes multiple amendments intended to simplify aspects of share-based payment accounting, and was effective for us at January 1, 2017. We have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. In connection with the adoption of the standard, the Company recorded a $10.8 million deferred tax asset and a corresponding $10.8 million valuation allowance.

~~Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective~~

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flow (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" which amends Accounting Standards Codification 230, to clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows ("ASU 2016-15"). The FASB issued ASU 2016-15 with the intent of reducing diversity in practice with respect to eight types of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that adoption will have on the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flow.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” ("ASU 2014-09"), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, delaying the effective date of ASU 2014-09. Three other amendments were issued during 2016 modifying the original ASU. As amended, the new standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, using either a retrospective basis or a modified retrospective basis with early adoption permitted. We currently plan to adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018.

We are continuing to work towards establishing policies, updating our processes and implementing necessary changes to data and processes to be able to comply with the new requirements. Based on the results of our assessment to date, we do not expect that the new standard will result in significant changes in our units of accounting or the amounts of revenue allocated between units of accounting. Further, our initial evaluation is that monthly recurring charges from colocation and cloud services, which is a majority of our revenues, would not be materially impacted by the adoption of this standard. We are currently evaluating the impact to certain non-recurring charges including installation as well as the impact of contract acquisition and fulfillment costs. Our initial conclusion may change when we complete our evaluation which is proceeding as planned.

While we are continuing to assess all potential impacts of the standard, we currently believe the most significant impact relates to additional disclosures related to qualitative and quantitative information concerning the nature, amount, timing, and any uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers, the capitalization of costs of commissions, upfront contract costs, and other contract acquisition-based and contract fulfillment costs on the consolidated balance sheets.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"), which requires all leases in excess of 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet as lease assets and lease liabilities. For operating leases, a lessee is required to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payment; recognize a single lease cost over the lease term generally on a straight-line basis; and classify all cash payments within operating activities on the cash flow statement. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATIONS

As used herein, except as otherwise indicated by context, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “INAP.” or “the Company” refers to Internap Corporation and our subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

This ~~Quarterly Report on~~ Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. ~~These forward-looking~~Forward-looking statements include statements ~~related~~regarding industry trends, our future financial position and performance, business strategy, revenues and expenses in future periods, projected levels of growth and other matters that do not relate strictly to historical facts. These statements are often identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “plans,” “intends,” “continue,” “could” or “should,” that an “opportunity” exists, that we are “positioned” for a particular result, statements regarding our cash requirements, cost reduction strategies, the availability of financing, our working capital needs and our expectations for full-year 2017 capital expenditures. Our ability to achieve these forward-lookingvision or similar expressions or variations. These statements isare based on ~~certain assumptions, including~~the beliefs and expectations of our ~~ability to execute~~management team based on ~~our business strategy, leveraging of multiple routes to market, expanded brand~~

~~awareness for high-performance Internet infrastructure services and customer churn levels. These assumptions may prove inaccurate in~~information available at the ~~future. Because~~time such statements are made. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance ~~or results~~ and ~~involve~~are subject to risks and uncertainties ~~there are important factors~~ that could cause ~~Internap’s~~ actual results to differ materially from those ~~expressed or implied~~contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Therefore, actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is forecast in ~~the~~such forward-looking statements due to a variety of ~~important factors.~~

~~Such important~~ factors, ~~include,~~including, without limitation: ~~our ability~~ to ~~execute on our business strategy into a pure-play business and~~ drive growth while reducing costs; our ability to maintain current customers and obtain new ones, whether in a cost-effective manner or at all; ~~increased competition in~~the robustness of the IT infrastructure services market; our ability to achieve or sustain profitability; our ability to expand margins and drive higher returns on investment; our ability to sell into new and existing data center space;

the actual performance of our IT infrastructure services and improving operations; our ability to correctly forecast capital needs, demand planning and space utilization; our ability to respond successfully to technological change and the resulting competition; the geographic concentration of the ~~Company’s~~company’s data centers in certain markets and any adverse developments in local economic conditions or the demand for data center space in these markets; ~~our~~ ability to identify any suitable strategic transactions; INAP's ability to realize anticipated revenue, growth, synergies and cost savings from the acquisition of SingleHop; INAP's ability to successfully integrate SingleHop’s sales, operations, technology, and products generally; the availability of services from Internet network service providers or network service providers providing network access loops and local loops on favorable terms, or at all; ~~the~~ failure of third party suppliers to deliver their products and services on favorable terms, or at all; failures in our network operations centers, data centers, network access points or computer systems; our ability to provide or improve Internet infrastructure services to our customers; our ability to protect our intellectual property; our substantial amount of indebtedness, our possibility to raise additional capital when needed, on attractive terms, or at ~~all;~~all, our ability to service existing

debt or maintain compliance with financial and other covenants contained in our credit agreement; our compliance with and changes in complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and internationally; our ability to attract and retain qualified management and other personnel; and volatility in the trading price of INAP common stock.

These risks and other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, and our other reports filed with the SEC could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this ~~Quarterly Report on~~ Form 10-Q.

Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking ~~statements.~~statements as a prediction of actual results. All forward-looking statements attributable to INAP or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing ~~cautionary~~forward-looking statements. All such statements speak only as of the date made, and INAP undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

INAP ~~provides Internet~~is a global provider of high-performance data center services, including colocation, cloud and network. INAP partners with its customers, who range from the Fortune 500 to emerging start-ups, to create secure, scalable and reliable IT infrastructure through both Colocation Business and Enterprise Services (including colocation, network connectivity, IP, bandwidth, and managed services and hosting), and Cloud Services (including enterprise-grade AgileCLOUD, bare-metal servers, and SMB iWeb platforms).solutions that meet the customer’s unique business requirements. INAP operates in 53, primarily Tier ~~3-type~~3, data centers in 21 metropolitan markets ~~primarily in North America, with 50 datacenters~~ and 89has 102 POPs around the world. ~~Currently,~~ INAP has over 1 million gross square feet ~~under lease, with 500,000~~in its portfolio, and approximately 600,000 square feet of sellable data center space. ~~INAP operates a premium business model that provides high-power density colocation, low-latency bandwidth, and public and private cloud platforms in an expanding Internet infrastructure industry.~~

Change in Organizational Structure

During the three months ended March 31, ~~2017,~~2018, we changed our organizational structure in an effort to create more effective and efficient business operations and to improve customer and product focus. In that regard, we revised the information that our chief executive officer, who is also our chief operating decision maker, regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. As a result, we report our financial performance based on our two revised segments, INAP ~~COLO~~US and INAP ~~CLOUD.~~INTL. The new operating segments are ~~further~~ described in ~~note~~Note 10, “Operating Segments” in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. We have reclassified prior period amounts to conform to the current presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are summarized in ~~note 12~~Note 2, "Recent Accounting ~~Pronouncements"~~Pronouncements," in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017

The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss data during the periods presented, including comparative information between the periods (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Increase (Decrease) from
2016 to 2017
2017 2016 Amount Percent
Revenues:

INAP COLO $ 51,344

$ 54,998
$ (3,654 ) (7 )%
INAP CLOUD 17,563

18,942
(1,379 ) (7 )
Total revenues 68,907

73,940
(5,033 ) (7 )

Operating costs and expenses:

Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, shown below:

INAP COLO 20,785

26,676
(5,891 ) (22 )
INAP CLOUD 4,160

4,886
(726 ) (15 )
Direct costs of customer support 6,237

7,985
(1,748 ) (22 )
Sales, general and administrative 15,331

18,355
(3,024 ) (16 )
Depreciation and amortization 20,917

19,597
1,320
7
Goodwill impairment —
78,169
(78,169 ) (100 )
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 745

1,670
(925 ) (55 )
Total operating costs and expenses 68,175

157,338
(89,163 ) (57 )
Income (loss) from operations $ 732

$ (83,398 ) $ 84,130
(101 )

Interest expense $ 12,299
$ 7,878
$ 4,421
56 %



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease) from 2017 to 2018
	2018		2017		Amount		Percent
Net revenues	$	82,972	$	68,907	$	14,065	20	%

Operating costs and expenses:
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization	28,866		24,945		3,921		16	%
Costs of customer support	7,984		6,237		1,747		28	%
Sales, general and administrative	18,170		15,331		2,839		19	%
Depreciation and amortization	23,431		20,917		2,514		12	%
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments	2,347		745		1,602		215	%
Total operating costs and expenses	80,798		68,175		12,623		19	%
Income (loss) from operations	$	2,174	$	732	$	1,442	(197	)%

Interest expense	$	16,898	$	12,299	$	4,599	37	%

Supplemental Schedule



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease) from 2017 to 2018
	2018		2017		Amount		Percent
Revenues:
INAP US	$	65,678	$	52,970	$	12,708	24	%
INAP INTL	17,294		15,937		1,357		9	%
Net revenues	82,972		68,907		14,065		20	%

Cost of sales and services:
INAP US	21,853		18,906		2,947		16	%
INAP INTL	7,013		6,039		974		16	%
Total costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization	$	28,866	$	24,945	$	3,921	16	%

INAP ~~COLO~~US

Revenues for our ~~Colocation~~INAP US segment ~~decreased 7%~~increased 24% to ~~$51.3~~$65.7 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$55.0~~$53.0 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~$1.1 million~~revenue from organic growth, and the addition of lower network services revenue related to the continued downward pricing pressures and a $3.5 million decrease in colocation and managed hosting revenue due to negative impact of churn from a small number of large customers and exiting a data center. The declines were partially offset from the consolidation of INAP Japan.SingleHop.

Direct costs of our ~~Colocation~~INAP US segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, ~~decreased 22%~~increased 16%, to ~~$20.8~~$21.9 million for the three

months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $26.7 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to $4 million of operating lease expenses capitalized in our capital lease conversion and $2.5 million of lower variable costs related to a decline in revenue and cost reductions offset by $0.6 million of INAP Japan costs.

~~INAP CLOUD~~

~~Revenues for our Cloud segment decreased 7% to $17.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,~~2018, compared to $18.9 million for the same period in ~~2016. Approximately $0.3 million of the decrease~~2017. The increase was ~~attributable~~primarily due to ~~the~~SingleHop costs, partially offset by lower space and power costs from planned ~~closure of our 75 Broad Street, New York facility.~~data center exits and network cost savings initiatives.

~~Direct costs of~~

INAP INTL

Revenues for our ~~Cloud~~INAP INTL segment ~~exclusive of depreciation and amortization, decreased 15%,~~increased 9% to ~~$4.2~~$17.3 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$4.9~~$15.9 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to revenue from the ~~planned closure~~INAP Japan consolidation, the addition of SingleHop and lower churn.

Direct costs of our ~~75 Broad Street, New York facility.~~

INAP INTL segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, increased 16%, to $7.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $6.0 million for the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily due to $0.9 million in costs from the INAP Japan consolidation and costs from SingleHop.

~~Geographic Information~~

~~Revenues are allocated to countries based on location of services. Revenues, by country with revenues over 10% of total revenues, are as follows (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016
United States $ 54,006
$ 57,916
Canada 9,421
11,016
Other countries 5,480
5,008
$ 68,907
$ 73,940

Other Operating Costs and Expenses

Compensation. Total compensation and benefits, including stock-based compensation, was ~~$14.4~~$16.9 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$16.2~~$14.4 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~primarily~~ due to ~~a $1.9~~$2.8 million ~~decrease~~increase in cash-based compensation and ~~payroll taxes, partially~~$0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation, offset by a $0.6 million ~~increase~~decrease in commissions and $0.1 million decrease in bonus accrual.

Stock-based compensation, net of amount capitalized, ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$0.9~~$1.3 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, from ~~$1.3~~$0.9 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase is ~~primarily~~ due to ~~lower stock-based compensation due to prior year terminations.~~additional employees receiving equity grants, and directors receiving their fees in shares of common stock in lieu of cash. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in the accompanying ~~consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss~~Comprehensive Loss (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2018		2017
Direct costs of customer support	$	38	$	277
Costs of customer support					$	38	$	38
Sales, general and administrative	891		976		1,303		891
	$	929	$	1,253	$	1,341	$	929

~~Direct~~ Costs of Customer Support. ~~Direct costs~~Costs of customer support ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$6.2~~$8.0 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$8.0~~$6.2 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~a decrease in~~higher cash-based compensation due to increased headcount from ~~reduced headcount.~~the SingleHop acquisition.

Sales, General and Administrative. Sales, general and administrative costs ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$15.3~~$18.2 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$18.4~~$15.3 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~a $2.5~~$1.1 million ~~decrease in organizational realignment costs and a $0.6 million decrease~~increase in cash-based compensation, ~~from reduced headcount.~~$0.8 million increase in commissions, $0.4 million increase in facility costs, $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation due to additional employees receiving equity grants and $0.1 million increase in other benefits.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased to ~~$20.9~~$23.4 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018, compared to ~~$19.6~~$20.9 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase is primarily ~~related~~due to ~~additional~~the depreciation ~~expense related to new~~on the capital ~~leases.~~leased assets obtained during the third quarter of 2018.

Exit activities, Restructuring and Impairments. Exit activities, restructuring and impairments ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$0.7~~$2.3 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$1.7~~$0.7 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase is primarily due to ~~the prior year impairment of internally-developed software.~~planned data center exits.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to ~~$12.3~~$16.9 million during the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$7.9~~$12.3 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase is primarily due to ~~additional expense related to extinguishment of discount and debt issuance costs of the previous term loan plus costs related to the new term loan~~increased borrowings and additional interest expense related to ~~new~~ capital leases.

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Increase (Decrease) from
2016 to 2017
2017 2016 Amount Percent
Revenues:

INAP COLO $ 156,727

$ 166,707
$ (9,980 ) (6 )%
INAP CLOUD 53,955

57,473
(3,518 ) (6 )
Total revenues 210,682

224,180
(13,498 ) (6 )

Operating costs and expenses:

Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, shown below:

INAP COLO 67,661

79,745
(12,084 ) (15 )
INAP CLOUD 12,758

14,264
(1,506 ) (11 )
Direct costs of customer support 19,634

24,709
(5,075 ) (21 )
Sales, general and administrative 47,466

55,416
(7,950 ) (14 )
Depreciation and amortization 57,596

57,927
(331 ) (1 )
Goodwill impairment —
78,169
(78,169 ) (100 )
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments 6,396

2,023
4,373
216
Total operating costs and expenses 211,511

312,253
(100,742 ) (32 )
Income (loss) from operations $ (829 )
$ (88,073 ) $ 87,244
(99 )

Interest expense $ 37,581

$ 22,945
$ 14,636
64 %



	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Increase (Decrease) from 2017 to 2018
	2018		2017			Amount			Percent
Net revenues	$	239,135	$	210,682		$	28,453		14	%

Operating costs and expenses:
Costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization	81,880		80,419			1,461			2	%
Costs of customer support	24,212		19,634			4,578			23	%
Sales, general and administrative	57,625		47,466			10,159			21	%
Depreciation and amortization	67,097		57,596			9,501			16	%
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments	3,140		6,396			(3,256		)	(51	)%
Total operating costs and expenses	233,954		211,511			22,443			11	%
Income (loss) from operations	$	5,181	$	(829	)	$	6,010		725	%

Interest expense	$	47,786	$	37,581		$	10,205		27	%

Supplemental Schedule



	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease) from 2017 to 2018
	2018		2017		Amount			Percent
Revenues:
INAP US	$	186,821	$	162,544	$	24,277		15	%
INAP INTL	52,314		48,138		4,176			9	%
Net revenues	239,135		210,682		28,453			14	%

Cost of sales and services:
INAP US	61,125		63,589		(2,464		)	(4	)%
INAP INTL	20,755		16,830		3,925			23	%
Total costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization	$	81,880	$	80,419	$	1,461		2	%

INAP ~~COLO~~US

Revenues for our ~~Colocation~~INAP US segment ~~decreased 6%~~increased 15% to ~~$156.7~~$186.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$166.7~~$162.5 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease was partially due to $3.4 million of lower network services~~increase in revenue ~~related to continued downward pricing pressure and a $7.6 million decrease in colocation and managed hosting revenue due to~~is primarily from the ~~negative impact of churn from a small number of large customers. These declines were~~SingleHop acquisition, partially offset by ~~the consolidation of INAP Japan.~~a decline in network revenues primarily due to customer churn, in addition to other typical customer churn.

Direct costs of our ~~Colocation~~INAP US segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, decreased ~~15%~~4%, to ~~$67.7~~$61.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$79.7~~$63.6 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The decrease was primarily due to $6$5.0 million of ~~operating lease expenses capitalized in our capital lease conversion and $6 million of lower variable~~ costs related to ~~a decline in revenue~~conversion of operating leases to capital leases, $5.5 million from lower power and cost ~~reductions.~~savings from planned data center exits, $4.0 million network savings from cost initiatives and lower volume, partially offset by costs from SingleHop, and $3.9 million of costs from our data center additions.

INAP ~~CLOUD~~INTL

Revenues for our ~~Cloud~~INAP INTL segment ~~decreased 6%~~increased 9% to ~~$54.0~~$52.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$57.5~~$48.1 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decline is~~increase was primarily due to revenues from the ~~negative impact~~INAP Japan consolidation and addition of ~~churn from a small number of large customers.~~SingleHop.

Direct costs of our ~~Cloud~~INAP INTL segment, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, ~~decreased 11%~~increased 23%, to ~~$12.8~~$20.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$14.3~~$16.8 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to $3.2 million of costs from INAP Japan consolidation, costs from SingleHop, and $0.4 million from lower ~~variable costs related to a decline in revenue and cost reductions.~~margin product mix.

~~Geographic Information~~

~~Revenues are allocated to countries based on location of services. Revenues, by country with revenues over 10% of total revenues, are as follows (in thousands):~~

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016
United States $ 165,757
$ 174,800
Canada 29,320
33,159
Other countries 15,605
16,221
$ 210,682
$ 224,180

Other Operating Costs and Expenses

Compensation. Total compensation and benefits, including stock-based compensation, was ~~$43.2~~$51.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$51.7~~$43.2 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~change was primarily due to ~~a $7.0~~$6.9 million ~~decrease~~increase in cash-based compensation, ~~and payroll taxes, a $2.7~~$1.5 million ~~decrease~~increase in stock-based compensation, ~~partially offset by a $1.2~~$0.3 million increase in bonus ~~accrual.~~accrual, offset by $0.4 million decrease in commissions.

Stock-based compensation, net of amount capitalized, ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$2.1~~$3.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, from ~~$4.7~~$2.1 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase is ~~primarily~~ due to ~~lower stock-based compensation due to prior year terminations.~~additional employees receiving equity grants, and directors receiving their fees in shares of common stock in lieu of cash. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in the accompanying ~~consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss~~Comprehensive Loss (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2018		2017
Direct costs of customer support	$	136	$	958
Costs of customer support					$	133	$	136
Sales, general and administrative	1,925		3,759		3,441		1,925
	$	2,061	$	4,717	$	3,574	$	2,061

~~Direct~~ Costs of Customer Support. ~~Direct costs~~Costs of customer support ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$19.6~~$24.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$24.7~~$19.6 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily due to ~~a $3.9 million decrease in~~higher cash-based compensation due to increased headcount from ~~reduced headcount and a $0.8 million decrease in stock-based compensation.~~SingleHop.

Sales, General and Administrative. Sales, general and administrative costs ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$47.5~~$57.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$55.4~~$47.5 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~primarily~~ due to ~~a $4.9 decrease~~$2.7 million in ~~organizational realignment~~acquisition costs, ~~a $3.1~~$2.6 million ~~decrease~~ in higher cash-based compensation ~~from reduced~~due to increased headcount, ~~a $1.8~~$1.6 million ~~decrease~~increase in stock-based compensation ~~partially offset by a~~from more employees receiving stock compensation, $1.6 million increased in commissions, $0.9 million increase in ~~professional services.~~facility costs and $0.7 million decrease in internal software costs that were capitalized (resulting in increased compensation costs in "Sales, general and administrative" expenses).

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$57.6~~$67.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$57.9~~$57.6 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease was~~increase is primarily due to ~~lower~~the depreciation on the capital ~~purchases and older~~leased assets ~~becoming fully depreciated.~~obtained during the third quarter of 2018.

Exit activities, Restructuring and Impairments. Exit activities, restructuring and impairments ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$6.4~~$3.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~$2.0~~$6.4 million of expense during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily due to ~~ceasing use~~planned closures of data ~~center space and severance costs.~~centers in the prior year period, which resulted in the higher restructuring expenses.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to ~~$37.6~~$47.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 from ~~$22.9~~$37.6 million during the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase is primarily due to ~~additional expense related to extinguishment of discount and debt issuance costs of the previous term loan plus costs related to the new term loan~~increased borrowings and additional interest expense related to capital leases.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

We report our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. WeIn addition, we present ~~the non-GAAP performance measure of~~ Adjusted EBITDA, an additional financial measure that is not prepared in accordance with GAAP (“non-GAAP”). A reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to assist us in explaining underlying performance trends in our business, which we believe will enhance investors’ ability to analyze trends in our business and evaluate our performance relative to other companies and across periods. the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure can be found below.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as GAAP net loss attributable to INAP shareholders plus depreciation and amortization, interest expense, provision (benefit) for income taxes, other expense (income), (gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment, exit activities, restructuring and impairments, stock-based compensation, non-income tax contingency, strategic alternatives and related costs, organizational realignment costs, ~~pre-acquisition~~acquisition costs and claim settlement.

Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, and should be viewed as a supplement to —- not a substitute for —- our results of operations presented on the basis of GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA does not purport to represent cash flow provided by operating activities as defined by GAAP. Our statements of cash flows present our cash flow activity in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is used by and is useful to investors and other users of our financial statements in evaluating our operating performance because it provides them with an additional tool to compare business performance across companies and across periods. We believe that:

EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company-to-company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired; and

investors commonly adjust EBITDA information to eliminate the effect of disposals of property and equipment, impairments, restructuring and stock-based compensation which vary widely from company-to-company and impair comparability.

Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA:

as a measure of operating performance to assist in comparing performance from period-to-period on a consistent basis;

as a measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations; and

in communications with the board of directors, analysts and investors concerning our financial performance.

Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is presented as we understand certain investors use it as one measure of our historical ability to service debt. Also Adjusted EBITDA is used in our debt covenants.

Although we believe, for the foregoing reasons, that our presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our results of operations, our non-GAAP financial measure should only be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, any measure of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to net loss as presented in our ~~consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss:~~

Comprehensive Loss (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net Loss	$	(10,863	)	$	(91,297	)
Net revenues							$	82,972		$	68,907		$	239,135		$	210,682

Net loss attributable to INAP stockholders							$	(15,106	)	$	(10,895	)	$	(43,089	)	$	(38,409	)
Depreciation and amortization	20,917			19,597			23,431			20,917			67,097			57,596
Interest expense	12,299			7,878			16,898			12,299			47,786			37,581
Provision for income taxes	221			95			162			221			404			689
Other income	(925		)	(74		)
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment, net	(162		)	25
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments, including goodwill impairment	745			79,839
Other expense (income)							195			(925		)	11			(723		)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment, net							(66		)	(162		)	(96		)	(362		)
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments							2,347			745			3,140			6,396
Stock-based compensation	929			1,253			1,341			929			3,574			2,061
Acquisition costs							5			102			2,869			198
Strategic alternatives and related costs⁽¹⁾	—			1,121			25			32			75			46
Organizational realignment costs⁽²⁾	14			1,403			118			14			789			596
Pre-acquisition costs	102			—
Non-income tax contingency							36			—			836			1,500
Claim settlement							—			—			—			713
Adjusted EBITDA	$	23,277		$	19,840		$	29,386		$	23,277		$	83,396		$	67,882

⁽¹⁾

Primarily legal and other professional fees incurred in connection with the evaluation by our board of directors of strategic alternatives and related shareholder communications. We include these costs in sales, general and administrative ("SG&A") in the accompanying ~~consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss~~Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.

⁽²⁾

Primarily professional fees, employee retention bonus and severance and executive search costs incurred related to our organization realignment. We include these costs in SG&A in the accompanying ~~consolidated statements~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss~~Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

On an ongoing basis, we require capital to fund our current operations, expand our IT infrastructure services, upgrade existing facilities or establish new facilities, products, services or capabilities and to fund customer support initiatives, as well as various advertising and marketing programs to facilitate sales. As of September 30, 2018, we had $10.0 million of borrowing capacity under our 2017 revolving credit facility. Together with our cash and cash equivalents, the Company’s liquidity as of September 30, 2018 was $21.9 million.

As of September 30, 2018, we had a deficit of ~~$17.0~~$37.7 million in working capital, which represented an excess of current liabilities over current assets. We believe that cash flows from operations, together with our cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under our 2017 revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future. If our cash requirements vary materially from our expectations or if we fail to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations or if we fail to implement our cost reduction strategies, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on commercially favorable terms, or at all, and

provisions in our 2017 Credit Agreement limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness. Our anticipated uses of cash include capital expenditures in the range of ~~approximately $32.0 million~~$40.0 to ~~$37.0~~$43.0 million in ~~2017,~~2018, working capital needs and required payments on our ~~credit agreement~~2017 Credit Agreement and other commitments. We ~~intend~~continue to ~~reduce expenses~~optimize our cost structure through ~~continued~~implementing cost reductions ~~including an ongoing review of~~through such strategies as reorganizing our ~~organizational structure~~business units, right-sizing headcounts and ~~headcount needs and the~~ streamlining of other operational aspects of our business. However, there can be no guarantee that we will achieve any of our cost reduction goals.

We have a history of quarterly and annual period net losses. During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we had a net loss attributable to INAP stockholders of ~~$10.9~~$15.1 million and ~~$38.4~~$43.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our accumulated deficit was $1.3 billion. We may not be able to achieve profitability on a quarterly basis, and our failure to do so may adversely affect our business, including our ability to raise additional funds.

Our sources of capital include, but are not limited to, funds derived from selling our services and results of our operations, sales of assets, borrowings under our credit arrangement, the issuance of debt or equity securities or other possible recapitalization transactions. Our short term and long term liquidity depend primarily upon the funds derived from selling our services, working capital management (cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities), bank borrowings, reducing costs and bookings net of churn. In an effort to increase liquidity and generate cash, we may pursue sales of non-strategic assets, reduce our expenses, amend our credit facility, pursue sales of debt or equity securities or other recapitalization transactions, or seek other external sources of funds.

Capital Resources

Common Stock Offering

On October 23, 2018, the Company closed a public offering of 4,210,527 shares of common stock at $9.50 per share to the public and received from the underwriter net proceeds of $36.6 million (net of underwriting discounts and commissions, and other offering expenses). We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 631,579 additional shares of common stock on the same terms and conditions as the shares offered in the public offering.

Credit Agreement~~. During the three months ended June 30,~~

On April 6, 2017, we entered into a new ~~credit agreement~~Credit Agreement (the ~~“2017~~"2017 Credit ~~Agreement”~~Agreement"), which provides for a ~~$300~~$300.0 million term loan facility ("2017 term loan") and a ~~$25~~$25.0 million revolving credit facility ~~which includes a $15 million letter of~~(the " 2017 revolving credit ~~facility. In addition, the Company may request incremental term loans and/or incremental revolving loan commitments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50 million.~~

facility"). The proceeds of the 2017 term loan ~~facility~~ were used to refinance the Company’s ~~then~~ existing credit facility and to pay costs and expenses associated with the 2017 Credit Agreement.

Certain portions of refinancing transaction were considered an extinguishment of debt and certain portions were considered a modification. A total of $5.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the 2017 Credit Agreement. Of the $5.7 million in costs paid, $1.9 million related to the exchange of debt and was expensed, $3.3 million related to term loan third party costs and will be amortized over the term of the loan and $0.4 million are prepaid debt issuance costs related to the 2017 revolving credit facility and will be amortized over the term of the 2017 revolving credit facility. In addition, $4.8 million of debt discount and debt issuance costs related to the previous credit facility were expensed due to the extinguishment of that credit facility. The maturity date of the 2017 term loan is April 6, 2022 and the maturity date of the 2017 revolving credit facility is October 6, 2021.

As of September 30, 2018, the 2017 ~~the~~ term loan had an outstanding principal balance of ~~$299.3~~$430.2 million, which we repay in ~~$750,000~~$1.1 million quarterly installments on the last business day of each fiscal quarter with the remaining unpaid balance due April 6, 2022. ~~The~~As of September 30, 2018, the 2017 revolving credit facility ~~does not have~~had an outstanding ~~balance.~~balance of $18.5 million. We have issued ~~$4.9~~$5.7 million in letters of credit resulting in ~~$20.1~~$4.3 million in borrowing capacity. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the interest rate on the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was ~~8.24%.~~7.90% and 9.25%, respectively.

The 2017 Credit Agreement contains customary financial maintenance and operating covenants, including without limitation covenants restricting the incurrence or existence of debt or liens, the making of investments, the payment of dividends and affiliate transactions. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we were in compliance with ~~these~~all covenants.

~~Amended~~Second Amendment

On February 6, 2018, the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent, entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement (the "Second Amendment") that amended the 2017 Credit Agreement.

The Second Amendment, among other things, amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to (i) permit the Company to incur incremental term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement of up to $135.0 million to finance the Company’s acquisition of SingleHop and to pay related fees, costs and expenses and (ii) revise the maximum total net leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio covenants. The financial covenant amendments became effective upon the consummation of the SingleHop acquisition, while the other provisions of the Second Amendment became effective upon the execution and delivery of the Second Amendment.

Third Amendment

On ~~June~~February 28, 2018, INAP entered into the Incremental and Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the "Third Amendment"). The Third Amendment provides for a new incremental term loan facility under the 2017 Credit Agreement of $135.0 million (the "Incremental Term Loan"). The Incremental Term Loan has terms and conditions identical to the existing loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement, as amended. Proceeds of the Incremental Term Loan were used to complete the acquisition of SingleHop and to pay fees, costs and expenses related to the acquisition, the Third Amendment and the Incremental Term Loan.

Fourth Amendment

On April 9, 2018, the Company entered into ~~an amendment~~the Fourth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (the “Fourth Amendment”). The Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement to lower the interest rate margins applicable to the outstanding term loans under the 2017 Credit Agreement by 1.25%.

In addition, the Fourth Amendment amends the 2017 Credit Agreement such that ~~clarified~~if the Company incurs a “Repricing Event” (as defined in the 2017 Credit Agreement), before October 9, 2018, then the Company will incur a 1.00% prepayment premium on any term loans that are subject to such Repricing Event.

A total of $1.7 million was paid for debt issuance costs related to the ~~Company’s liabilities pursuant~~Fourth Amendment. Of the $1.7 million in costs paid, $0.1 million related to ~~any lease that was treated as rental~~the payment of legal and ~~lease expense,~~professional fees which were expensed, $1.6 million related to term loan lender fees and ~~not as a capital lease obligation or indebtedness, on~~will be amortized over the ~~closing date~~term of the 2017 Credit Agreement. This transaction was considered a modification.

Fifth Amendment

On August 28, 2018, the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to 2017 Credit Agreement, ~~would continue to be treated~~among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as ~~a rental and lease expense, and not as a capital lease obligations or indebtedness, for all purposes of~~Administrative Agent (the “Fifth Amendment”). The Fifth Amendment

amended the 2017 Credit Agreement ~~notwithstanding any amendment of~~by increasing the ~~lease that results in the treatment of such lease as a capital lease obligation or indebtedness for financial reporting purposes.~~aggregate revolving commitment capacity by $10.0 million to $35.0 million.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, net cash provided by operating activities ~~was $25.4 million. We generated cash from operations of $30.7~~increased $1.2 million ~~while~~to $29.2 million primarily due to the increase in changes in operating assets and ~~liabilities used cash of $5.3 million.~~liabilities. Net income adjusted for non-cash items remained relatively flat ($33.2 million and $33.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively). We expect to use cash flows from operating activities to fund a portion of our capital expenditures and other requirements and to meet our other commitments and obligations, including outstanding debt.

Investing Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2018, net cash ~~provided by operating~~used in investing activities was ~~$36.3 million. We generated cash from operations~~$161.8 million, primarily due to the SingleHop acquisition, capital expenditures related to the continued expansion and upgrade of ~~$31.9 million, while changes in operating assets~~our data centers and ~~liabilities provided cash of $4.4 million.~~

network infrastructure.

~~Investing Activities~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $19.8 million primarily due to capital expenditures related to the continued expansion and upgrade of our data centers and network infrastructure.

Financing Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2018, net cash ~~used in investing~~provided by financing activities was ~~$39.4~~$129.8 million, primarily due to principal payments of $10.5 million on the credit facilities and capital ~~expenditures related to~~lease obligations, partially offset by $148.5 million of proceeds from the ~~continued expansion and upgrade of our company-controlled data centers and network infrastructure.~~2017 Credit Agreement.

~~Financing Activities~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, net cash used byin financing activities was ~~$4.2~~$6.8 million, primarily due to principal payments of $333.8 million on the credit facilities and capital lease obligations, partially offset by $295.5 million of proceeds from the 2017 Credit Agreement and $40.2 million of proceeds from the sale of common ~~stock pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement.~~stock.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, net cash used by financing activities was $5.0 million, primarily due to principal payments of $9.5 million on the term loan and capital lease obligations, partially offset by $4.5 million of proceeds from the revolving credit facility.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

~~Other Investments~~

In previous years, we invested $4.1 million in Internap Japan Co., Ltd., our joint venture with NTT-ME Corporation and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation. We previously accounted for this investment using the equity method prior to obtaining control of the venture on August 15, 2017. The equity method investment is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Our objective in managing interest rate risk is to maintain favorable long-term fixed rate or a balance of fixed and variable rate debt within reasonable risk parameters.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the balance of our long-term debt was ~~$299.3~~$430.2 million on the 2017 term ~~loan.~~ loan and $18.5 million on the 2017 revolving credit facility.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the interest rate on the 2017 term loan and the 2017 revolving credit facility was ~~8.24%.~~7.90% and 9.25%, respectively. We summarize the 2017 Credit Agreement in “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources—Credit Agreement.”

We are required to pay a commitment fee at a rate of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit facility, payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, we are required to pay certain participation fees and fronting fees in connection with standby letters of credit issued under the 2017 revolving credit facility.

We estimate that a change in the interest rate of 100 basis points would change our interest expense and payments by ~~$3.0~~$4.5 million per year, assuming we do not increase our amount outstanding.

Foreign Currency Risk

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the majority of our revenue was in U.S. dollars. However, our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We also have exposure to foreign currency transaction gains and losses as the result of certain receivables due from our foreign subsidiaries. During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we realized a foreign currency ~~losses~~loss of $0.2 million and ~~$0.5~~less than $0.1 million, respectively, which we included in “Non-operating expenses,” and we recorded an unrealized foreign currency translation ~~gains~~loss of $0$0.1 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively, which we included in “Other comprehensive ~~loss,~~(loss) income,” both in the accompanying ~~consolidated statement~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~operations~~Operations and ~~comprehensive loss. If~~Comprehensive Loss. As we grow our international operations, our exposure to foreign currency risk will become more significant.

We had foreign currency contracts to mitigate the risk of a portion of our Canadian employee benefit expense. These contracts hedged foreign exchange variations between the United States and Canadian dollar through June 30, 2017. The contract expired on June 30, 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded an unrealized gain of $0.1 million, respectively, which we included in “Other comprehensive income,” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described in Part II, Item 9A of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were not effective as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~There was no change in our~~Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted the new revenue guidance under ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of this guidance required the implementation of new accounting policies and processes which changed the Company’s internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting ~~that occurred during~~for revenue and cost recognition, processes for calculating the ~~quarter ended September 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, other than~~cumulative effect adjustment as ~~described below~~well as related disclosure requirements under the ~~caption “Remediation Plan.”~~new guidance.

Remediation Plan

~~We have taken actions to remediate the~~During 2017, management identified a material weakness in our internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting related to the review of property and ~~have implemented additional processes~~equipment, depreciation and amortization schedules. The Company has been actively engaged in remediation efforts and will continue initiatives to implement, document, and communicate appropriate policies, procedures, and internal controls ~~designed to address the underlying causes associated with the above mentioned~~regarding this material weakness. ~~We have reassessed~~The Company’s remediation of the ~~design~~identified material weakness and strengthening of ~~our review~~its internal control ~~over the forecasted cash flows utilized~~environment will require continued efforts in the related impairment models and going concern assessment to add greater precision to detect and prevent material misstatements, including the establishment of processes and controls to evaluate adequate review and inquiry over data and assumptions for financial forecasts.2018.

As the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve internal control over financial reporting, the Company may determine to take additional measures to address the material weakness or determine to modify the remediation efforts described above. Until the remediation efforts discussed above, including any additional remediation efforts that the Company identifies as necessary, are implemented, tested and deemed to be operating effectively, the material weakness described above will continue to exist.

Our enhanced review procedures and documentation standards were in place and operating during the third quarter of 2017. We are in the process of testing the newly implemented internal controls and related procedures. The material weakness cannot be considered remediated until the control has operated for a sufficient period of time and until management has concluded, through testing, that the control is operating effectively. Our goal is to remediate this material weakness by the end of 2017.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We believe that there have been no material changes from the Risk Factors we previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 filed with the SEC on March ~~13, 2017.~~15, 2018.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table sets forth information regarding our repurchases of securities for each calendar month in the three months ended September 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)
Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 to 31, 2017 205
$ 4.14
—
—
August 1 to 31, 2017 1,075
3.98
—
—
September 1 to 30, 2017 1,484
4.35
—
—
Total 2,764
$ 4.19
—
—



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 to 31, 2018	759	$	11.46	—	—
August 1 to 31, 2018	206	13.33		—	—
September 1 to 30, 2018	310	12.63		—	—
Total	1,275	$	12.04	—	—


(1)	These shares were surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units previously issued to ~~employees and directors.~~employees.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Disclosure Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act

Under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is required to disclose in its periodic reports if it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with entities or individuals designated pursuant to certain Executive Orders. Disclosure is required even where the activities are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and even if the activities are not covered or prohibited by U.S. law.

We determined that, between November 2012 and September 2018, our subsidiary iWeb provided information technology services to Pioneer Logistics Havacilik Turizm Yonetim Danismanlik Ithalat Ihracat San. Tic. Ltd. Sti, a Turkish company (“Pioneer Logistics”). On August 29, 2014, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) determined that Pioneer Logistics was part of a procurement ring which directly supported the operation of Mahan Airlines, an Iranian airline and entity on BIS’s denied persons list.

From August 2014 to September 2018, iWeb received approximately $8,855 in fees from Pioneer Logistics. We are unable to accurately calculate the net profit attributable to these transactions. We promptly terminated Pioneer Logistics as a customer upon learning of its designation and do not plan to provide services to Pioneer Logistics in the future.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:



Exhibit Number			Description

10.1			Incremental and Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2018, among Internap Corporation, each of the Lenders party thereto and Jefferies Finance LLC, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 31, 2018).

31.1			Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, executed by Peter D. Aquino, President and Chief Executive Officer.

31.2			Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification, executed by ~~Robert Dennerlein,~~James C. Keeley, Chief Financial ~~Officer~~Officer..

32.1*			Section 1350 Certification, executed by Peter D. Aquino, President and Chief Executive Officer.

32.2*			Section 1350 Certification, executed by ~~Robert Dennerlein,~~James C. Keeley, Chief Financial Officer.

101.INS			XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

*

* This exhibit is furnished and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes ~~of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act~~ of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78r) ("Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or ~~otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or Securities~~ Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



	INTERNAP CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ ~~Robert Dennerlein~~James C. Keeley
		~~Robert Dennerlein~~James C. Keeley
		(Chief Financial Officer)

		Date: November ~~2, 2017~~1, 2018



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
	As Previously Reported		Reclassification			As Reported
Revenues:
Data center and network services	$	49,767	$	(49,767	)	$	—
Cloud and hosting services	24,173		(24,173		)	—
INAP COLO	—		54,998			54,998
INAP CLOUD	—		18,942			18,942
Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:
Data center and network services	25,042		(25,042		)	—
Cloud and hosting services	6,520		(6,520		)	—
INAP COLO	—		26,676			26,676
INAP CLOUD	—		4,886			4,886



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	As Previously Reported		Reclassification			As Reported
Revenues:
Data center and network services	$	151,099	$	(151,099	)	$	—
Cloud and hosting services	73,081		(73,081		)	—
INAP COLO	—		166,707			166,707
INAP CLOUD	—		57,473			57,473
Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization:
Data center and network services	74,065		(74,065		)	—
Cloud and hosting services	19,944		(19,944		)	—
INAP COLO	$	—	79,745			79,745
INAP CLOUD	$	—	14,264			14,264



Balance, January 1, 2017	$	2,810
Accretion	155
Subsequent revision of estimated obligation	449
Payments	(415		)
Aquisition of Internap Japan	158
Balance, September 30, 2017	$	3,157



	Balance December 31, 2016		Initial Charges		Plan Adjustments		Cash Payments			Balance September 30, 2017
Activity for 2017 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligations	$	—	$	4,024	$	654	$	(881	)	$	3,797
Activity for 2016 restructuring charge:
Severance	1,911		—		958		(2,467		)	402
Real estate obligations	933		—		76		(730		)	279
Activity for 2015 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligation	111		—		2		(38		)	75
Service contracts	565		—		15		(148		)	432
Activity for 2014 restructuring charge:
Real estate obligation	1,183		—		95		(463		)	815
	$	4,703	$	4,024	$	1,800	$	(4,727	)	$	5,800




2017	$7,530
2018	31,062
2019	28,546
2020	24,432
2021	23,970
Thereafter	365,284
Remaining capital lease payments	480,824
Less: amounts representing imputed interest	(262,168	)
Present value of minimum lease payments	218,656
Less: current portion	(11,729	)
	$206,927



	Three Months Ended September 30,					Increase (Decrease) from 2016 to 2017
	2017		2016			Amount			Percent
Revenues:
INAP COLO	$	51,344	$	54,998		$	(3,654	)	(7	)%
INAP CLOUD	17,563		18,942			(1,379		)	(7	)
Total revenues	68,907		73,940			(5,033		)	(7	)

Operating costs and expenses:
Direct costs of sales and services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, shown below:
INAP COLO	20,785		26,676			(5,891		)	(22	)
INAP CLOUD	4,160		4,886			(726		)	(15	)
Direct costs of customer support	6,237		7,985			(1,748		)	(22	)
Sales, general and administrative	15,331		18,355			(3,024		)	(16	)
Depreciation and amortization	20,917		19,597			1,320			7
Goodwill impairment	—		78,169			(78,169		)	(100	)
Exit activities, restructuring and impairments	745		1,670			(925		)	(55	)
Total operating costs and expenses	68,175		157,338			(89,163		)	(57	)
Income (loss) from operations	$	732	$	(83,398	)	$	84,130		(101	)

Interest expense	$	12,299	$	7,878		$	4,421		56	%