UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2021 2022

or

☐    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 333-108057

4532 US Highway 19 North

Suite 200

New Port Richey, FL 34652

(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(800) 249-3700

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YESYes ☒ NO ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated“accelerated filer, “large accelerated filer"filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ☐    NO ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ☐ NO ☒

The General Partner agreed to forgo distributions and allocations of net income owed to it, and suspended limited partner distributions. The General Partner will continue to waive certain fees and may defer certain related party payables owed to the Partnership in an effort to further increase the Partnership’s cash flow. Additionally, the Partnership will seek to enhance portfolio returns and maximize cash flow through the use of leveraged lease transactions: the acquisition of lease equipment through financing. The Partnership may also attempt to obtain additional funds by disposing of or refinancing equipment, or by borrowing within its permissible limits. However, at this time, it is uncertain as to whether the General Partner’s plans will be successful.

The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31, 20202021 has been prepared from the books and records without audit. The following unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Financial information as of December 31, 20202021 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Partnership, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles to be included in audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods indicated, have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 30, 202131, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of financial results that may be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2021.

Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We consider cash equivalents to be highly liquid investments with the original maturity dates of 90 days or less.

The Partnership’s bank balances are fully insured by the FDIC. The Partnership deposits its funds with a Moody'sMoody’s Aaa-Rated banking institution which is one of only three Aaa-Rated banks listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 20212022 due to many factors, including cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and interest rates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). This standard establishes an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which is intended to result in a timelier recognition of losses. Under the CECL model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments, but not expected extensions or modifications) from the date of initial recognition of the financial instrument. Measurement of expected credit losses are to be based on relevant forecasts that affect collectability. The scope of financial assets within the CECL methodology is broad and includes trade receivables from certain revenue transactions and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. Different components of the guidance require modified retrospective or prospective adoption.

In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses. ASU 2018-19 clarifies that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of the credit losses standard. Instead, entities would need to apply other U.S. GAAP, namely Topic 842 (Leases), to account for changes in the collectability assessment for operating leases. Other than operating lease receivables, Partnership trade receivables include receivables from finance leases and equipment sales. Under Topic 606 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers), revenue is recognized when, among other criteria, it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled for goods or services transferred to a customer. At the point that finance lease receivables are recorded, they become subject to the CECL model and estimates of expected credit losses over their contractual life will be required to be recorded at inception based on historical information, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Trade receivables derived from equipment sales are of short duration and there is not a material difference between incurred losses and expected losses.

In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, which amends and clarifies several provisions of Topic 326. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief, which amends Topic 326 to allow the fair value option to be elected for certain financial instruments upon adoption. ASU 2019-10 extended the effective date of ASU 2016-13 for the Partnership until December 15, 2022. While we continuethe Partnership continues to evaluate the new guidance, including the subsequent updates to Topic 326, we doit does not anticipate that adoption will have a material impact on the PartnershipPartnership’s financial statements and related disclosures.  For both the quartersthree months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, Partnership2022, the Partnership’s finance lease revenue subject to CECL represented less than 1% of total lease revenue.

The Partnership is the lessor of equipment under operating leases with periods that generally will range from 12 to 48 months. In general, associated costs such as repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes are paid by the lessee.

Gains and losses from the sale of equipment are recognized when the lease is modified and terminated concurrently. Gain from the sale of equipment included in lease revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2021,2022, was approximately $0.

The Partnership’s share of the cost of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at March 31, 20212022 was approximately $1,924,000$1,887,000 and is included in the Partnership’s equipment on its balance sheet. The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at March 31, 20212022 was approximately $8,295,000.$8,222,000. The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at March 31, 2022 was approximately $0 and is included in the Partnership’s notes payable on its balance sheet. The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at March 31, 2022 was approximately $0.

The Partnership’s share of the cost of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at December 31, 2021 was approximately $1,887,000 and is included in the Partnership’s equipment on its balance sheet. The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at December 31, 2021 was approximately $8,222,000. The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at December 31, 2021 was approximately $0 and is included in the Partnership’s notes payable on its balance sheet. The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at MarchDecember 31, 2021 was approximately $0.

As the Partnership and the other programs managed by the General Partner continue to acquire new equipment for the portfolio, opportunities for shared participation are expected to continue. Sharing in the acquisition of a lease portfolio gives the fund an opportunity to acquire additional assets and revenue streams, while allowing the fund to remain diversified and reducing its overall risk with respect to one portfolio.

The following is a schedule of approximate future minimum rentals on non-cancellable operating leases at March 31, 2021:

As of March 31, 2021,2022, and December 31, 2020,2021, the Company’s related party receivables and payables are short term, unsecured and non-interest bearing.

Notes payable consisted of the following approximate amounts:

These notes are secured by specific equipment with a carrying value of approximately $26,000$19,000 and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership. As such, the notes do not contain any financial debt covenants with which wethe Partnership must comply on either an annual or quarterly basis. Aggregate approximate maturities of notes payable for each of the periods subsequent to March 31, 20212022 are as follows:

No interest or principal on notes payable was paid by the Partnership during 20212022 and 20202021 because direct payment was made by lessee to the bank in lieu of collection of lease income and payment of interest and principal by the Partnership.

Other noncash activities included in the determination of net income (loss) are as follows:

COVID-19 Pandemic

The amount of revenue recognized and the pattern of revenue recognition may be impacted by COVID-19. SomeIn December 2019, a strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, and has spread globally, and on March 12, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic. In an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, many countries, including the United States, have imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel, quarantines, and other public health safety measures. Such government-imposed precautionary measures may have been relaxed in certain countries or states, but there is no assurance that more strict measures will be put in place again due to a resurgence in COVID-19 cases. In addition, the COVID-19 virus and other infectious diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, resulting in an economic downturn that could impact the Company’s business, sectors that we service such as education centers, medical facilities, payroll administrators, manufacturingfinancial condition, and transportation, we may need to account for returns and refund liabilities.results of operations. The pattern of revenue recognition may change for delays in rendering services.

In periods ended subsequent to the outbreak of COVID-19, the impact on expected credit losses and future cash flow projections used in impairment testing will need to be considered.

The CompanyPartnership continues to evaluate whether adjustments to the financial statements are required or whether additional disclosures are necessary.  In ourits leasing business, the CompanyPartnership is always subject to credit losses as it relates to a customer’s ability to make timely rental payments.  The impact of COVID-19 may contribute to risk of non-performance, where a customer may experience financial difficulty and may delay in making timely payments.

The CompanyPartnership recognizes impairment of receivables and loans when losses are incurred, which is when it is probable that an entity will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the arrangement.  Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at thea receivable’s or loansa loan’s effective interest rate, except that, as a practical expedient, impairment can be measured based on a receivable’s or a loans’ observable market price or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

The CompanyPartnership believes its estimate of expected losses have been recognized based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts.  The impacts of COVID-19 may necessitate additional adjustments in future forecasts of expected losses.

Although the Partnership cannot estimate the length or gravity of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak at this time, if the pandemic continues, it may have a material adverse effect on the PartnershipPartnership’s results of future operations, financial position, and liquidity in fiscal year 20212022 and beyond.

FINRA

The decision of the Hearing Panel was stayed when it was appealed to FINRA'sFINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (the “NAC”) pursuant to FINRA Rule 9311.  The NAC issued a decision that upheld the lower panel’s ruling and the bar took effect on August 23, 2016.  Ms. Springsteen-Abbott appealed the NAC’s decision to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  On March 31, 2017, the SEC criticized that decision as so flawed that the SEC could not even review it, and remanded the matter back to FINRA for further consideration consistent with the SEC’s remand, but did not suggest any view as to a particular outcome.

On July 21, 2017, FINRA reduced the list of 1,840 items totaling $208,000 to a remaining list of 87 items totaling $36,226 (which includes approximately $30,000 of continuing education expenses for personnel providing services to the Funds), and reduced the proposed fine from $100,000 to $50,000, but reaffirmed its position on the bar from the securities industry.  Respondents promptly appealed FINRA’s revised ruling to the SEC.  All the requested or allowed briefs have been filed with the SEC.  Despite offering no additional evidence or legal reasoning from when SEC originally remanded this matter (for FINRA’s opinion being an unreviewably flawed opinion), the SEC upheld FINRA’s new order on February 7, 2020 as to bar, but eliminatedthe bar; however, FINRA’s proposed fine.fine was voided.  Ms. Springsteen-Abbott has filed a Petition for Review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review a final order entered against her by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  On February 26, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, made their ruling.  They dismissed in part and denied in part Ms. Springsteen-Abbott’s petition. This was regardless of CCC’s good faith reimbursements made many years ago of the questioned expense items of $208,000 (due to improper documentation), initially claimed misallocations by FINRA, even prior to FINRA’s reducing its final claim to $36,226. 

Prior to the original appeal to the SEC, Ms. Springsteen-Abbott discovered CCC’s required documentation of these items for FINRA review, which FINRA refused to consider, despite such efforts the District Court upheld the bar, despite admittingly not addressing her “due process” rights, for legal administrative procedural reasons.  However, given the SEC’s prior removal of FINRA’s fine and the District Court upholding that removal, the General Partner anticipates that this ruling will not result in any material financial impact to the Funds.

This section, as well as other portions of this document, includes certain forward-looking statements about our business and our prospects, tax treatment of certain transactions and accounting matters, sales of securities, expenses, cash flows, distributions, investments and operating and capital requirements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: acquisition policies of our general partner; the nature of present and future leases; provisions for uncollectible accounts; the strength and sustainability of the U.S. economy; the continued difficulties in the credit markets and their impact on the economy in general; and the level of future cash flow, debt levels, revenues, operating expenses, amortization and depreciation expenses. You can identify those statements by the use of words such as “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “will,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “potential,” “intend,” “continue” and “contemplate,” as well as similar words and expressions.

Actual results may differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements because any such statements involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based upon various important factors, including, but not limited to, nationwide economic, financial, political and regulatory conditions; the health of debt and equity markets, including interest rates and credit quality; the level and nature of spending in the information, medical and telecommunications technologies markets; and the effect of competitive financing alternatives and lease pricing.

Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed in other documents we file with the SEC, including, without limitation, those discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202021 filed with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

We invest in various types of domestic information technology equipment leases located solely within the United States. Our investment objective is to acquire primarily high technology equipment. We believe that dealing in high

We also acquire high technology medical, telecommunications and inventory management equipment. Our General Partner seeks to maintain an appropriate balance and diversity in the types of equipment acquired. The market for high technology medical equipment is growing each year. Generally, this type of equipment has a longer useful life. This allows for increased re-marketability, if it is returned before its economic or announcement cycle is depleted.

The Equipment Leasing and Finance Association’s (ELFA) Monthly Leasing and Finance Index (MLFI-25), which reports economic activity from 25 companies representing a cross section of the $900 billion equipment finance sector, showed their overall new business volume for March was $9.3$10.6 billion, up 4%14 percent year-over-year from new business volume in March 2020.2021. Volume was up 26%49 percent month-to-month from $7.4$7.1 billion in February. Year-to-date, cumulative new business volume was down 1%up 5 percent compared to 2020.

Receivables over 30 days were 1.9%,1.5 percent, down from 2.1%1.7 percent the previous month and down from 2.6%1.9 percent in the same period in 2020.2021. Charge-offs were 0.43%, down0.10 percent, up from 0.55%0.09 percent the previous month and down from 0.55%0.43 percent in the year-earlier period.

Credit approvals totaled 77%,78.3 percent, up from 75.8%78.2 percent in February. Total headcount for equipment finance companies was down 15.2% year-over-year, a decrease due to significant downsizing at an MLFI reporting company.

Separately, the Equipment Leasing & Finance Foundation’s Monthly Confidence Index (MCI-EFI) in April is an all-time high of 76.1, and an increase56.1, a decrease from the March index of 67.7. 

ELFA President and CEO Ralph Petta said, “The equipment finance industry appears poised to take advantage“MLFI-25 participants end the first quarter of an economic tailwind that is manifesting itself in an improving labor market, a continued low interest-rate environment, a strong corporate earnings season, and highthe year very favorably: new business confidence that is creating demand for investment in commercial equipment.  ELFA member organizations also report improving portfolio quality, which is reflective of their customers’ ability to meet their payment obligations as the pandemic’s grip on many businesses loosens.”

Mike Jones, President, CIT Business Capital, a division of First Citizens Bank, said, “Strong performance in the ELFA survey—for both month-over-month and year-over-year results—highlights the continued strength of the economy and the appetite of the business community for equipment financing to drive their growth. These positive results come even as ongoing supply chain issues delay some deliveries. Overall, continuing into second quarter, there seemsthe results are very encouraging for the balance of 2022, as end-customers show their determination to be continued growth and strength across all of our markets, which encompass small, middle, corporate and governmental.compete by investing in the latest equipment to power their businesses forward.”

Our business is directly impacted by factors such as economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond our control. Given these circumstances, we believe companies overall, will continue to increasingly turn to leasing, as a financing solution. It is our belief that companies lease business-essential equipment because leasing can provide many benefits to a company. The number one benefit of leasing that we see is that there is no large outlay of cash required. Therefore, companies can preserve their working capital, lease equipment, which is an expense item, have the flexibility to upgrade the equipment when needed, and have no risk of obsolescence. Because we expect leasing to remain an attractive financing solution for American businesses during the next 12 months, we feel that our ability to increase our portfolio size and leasing revenues during that period will remain strong.

We, at Commonwealth, are currently operating business as usual (with our employees working remotely).  We may see a slowdown on new equipment acquisition decisions from Corporate Lessees until the crisis is resolved and businesses can resume their normal operation.  We have no way of knowing what this period of time will be.  We will keep our investors informed of subsequent events.  For information relating to COVID-19 and the overall effects, as expressed by Ralph Petta, President of ELFA (The Equipment Leasing & Finance Association), please refer to elfaonline.org.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that our critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.  See Note 2 to our condensed financial statements included herein for a discussion related to recent accounting pronouncements.

Lease income receivable includes current lease income receivable net of allowances for uncollectible accounts,amounts, if any. The Partnership monitors lease income receivable to ensure timely and accurate payment by lessees. ItsThe Partnership’s Lease Relations department is responsible for monitoring lease income receivable and, as necessary, resolving outstanding invoices. Lease revenue is recognized on a monthly straight-line basis which is in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement.

The Partnership reviews a customer’s credit history before extending credit. When the analysis indicates that the probability of full collection is unlikely, the Partnership may establish an allowance for uncollectible lease income receivable based upon the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. The Partnership writes off its lease income receivable when it determines that it is uncollectible and all economically sensible means of recovery have been exhausted.

The Partnership is principally engaged in business of leasing equipment.  Ancillary to the Partnership’s principal equipment leasing business, the Partnership also sells certain equipment and may offer certain services to support its customers.

The Partnership’s lease transactions are principally accounted for under Topic 842 on January 1, 2019.  Prior to Topic 842, the Partnership accounted for these transactions under Topic 840, Leases (“Topic 840”).   Lease revenue includes revenue generated from leasing equipment to customers, including re-rent revenue, and is recognized as either on a straight line basis or using the effective interest method over the length of the lease contract, if such lease is either an operating lease or finance lease, respectively.

The Partnership’s sale of equipment along with certain services provided to customers is recognized under ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (“Topic 606”), which was adopted on January 1, 2018.  Prior to adoption of Topic 606, the Partnership recognized these transactions under ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognized, and (“Topic 605”).  The Partnership recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or service to a customer.  The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration the Partnership expects to be entitled to in exchange for such products or services.

Through March 31, 2021,2022, the Partnership’s lease portfolio consisted of operating leases. For operating leases, lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement.  Finance lease interest income is recorded over the term of the lease using the effective interest method.

Upon the end of the lease term, if the lessee has not met the return conditions as set out in the lease, the Partnership is entitled in certain cases to additional compensation from the lessee. The Partnership’s accounting policy for recording such payments is to treat them as revenue.

Gains or losses from sales of leased and off-lease equipment are recorded on a net basis in the Partnership’s Statement of Operations.  Gains from the termination of leases are recognized when the lease is modified and terminated concurrently.  Our leases do not contain any step-rent provisions or escalation clauses nor are lease revenues adjusted based on any index.

Partnership’s accounting policy for sales and property taxes collected from the lessees are recorded in the current period as gross revenues and expenses.

Depreciation on equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over useful lives of two to fourfive years. Once an asset comes off lease or is re-leased, the Partnership reassesses the useful life of an asset.

The Partnership evaluates its long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the asset may not be recoverable. The Partnership determines whether impairment exists by estimating the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by each asset. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset then impairment exists. The amount of the impairment is determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value. Fair value is determined based on estimated discounted cash flows to be generated by the asset, third party appraisals or comparable sales of similar assets, as applicable, based on asset type.  Residual values are determined by management and are calculated using information from both internal and external sources, as well as other economic indicators.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 was net proceeds from2022, the salePartnership did not have a primary source of equipment of approximately $2,000.cash.  This compares to the three months ended March 31, 2020,2021, where our primary source of cash was net proceeds from the sale of equipment of approximately $55,000.

Our primary use of cash for the three months ended March 31, 20212022 and 20202021 was cash used in operating activities of approximately $11,000$29,000 and $48,000,$11,000, respectively.  For the three months ended March 31, 20212022 and March 31, 2020,2021, the Partnership had no financing activities.

Cash was used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022 of approximately $29,000 which includes net loss of approximately $16,000 and depreciation expenses of approximately $18,000. Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net loss include direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $1,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2021, cash was used in operating activities of approximately $11,000 which includes net loss of approximately $53,000, depreciation expenses of approximately $34,000 and loss on sale of computer equipment of approximately $5,000. Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net loss include direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $8,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, cash was used in operating activities of approximately $48,000 which includes net loss of approximately $2,000, depreciation expenses of approximately $49,000, gain on sale of computer equipment of approximately $12,000, and bad debt recovery of approximately $34,000. Other non-cash activities included in the determination of net income include direct payments of lease income by lessees to banks of approximately $33,000.

We consider cash equivalents to be highly liquid investments with the original maturity dates of 90 days or less.

The Partnership’s bank balances are fully insured by the FDIC. The Partnership deposits its funds with a Moody'sMoody’s Aaa-Rated banking institution which is one of only three Aaa-Rated banks listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk.  The amount in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 20212022 due to many factors, including cash receipts, equipment acquisitions, interest rates, and distributions to limited partners.

Our investment strategy of acquiring equipment and generally leasing it under triple-net leases to operators who generally meet specified financial standards minimizes our operating expenses.  As of March 31, 2021,2022, we had future minimum rentals on operating leases of approximately $78,500$21,000 for the balance of the year ending DecemberMarch 31, 20212022 and approximately $78,500$43,000 thereafter

As of March 31, 2021,2022, our non-recourse debt was approximately $18,000,$14,000, with interest rates ranging from 4.70% torate of 5.31%, and will be payable through November 2024.

The Partnership was originally scheduled to end its operational phase on February 4, 2017.  During the year ended December 31, 2015, the operational phase was officially extended to December 31, 2020 through an investor proxy vote.  The Partnership is expected to terminate on December 31, 2022.  As such, it is the Partnership willPartnership’s intention to continue to report its financial statements on a going concern basis until a formal plan of liquidation is approved by the General Partner.

As the Partnership and the other programs managed by the General Partner increase their overall portfolio size, opportunities for shared participation are expected to continue. Sharing in the acquisition of a lease portfolio gives the fund an opportunity to acquire additional assets and revenue streams, while allowing the fund to remain diversified and reducing its overall risk with respect to one portfolio.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021,2022, the Partnership incurred positivenegative cash flow. However, historically the Partnership has reported recurring negative cash flows.  At March 31, 2021,2022, the Partnership has a working capital deficit of approximately $295,000.$381,000. Such factors raise substantial doubt about the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The General Partner elected to forgo distributions and allocations of net income owed to it, and suspended limited partner distributions for the three months ended March 31, 2021.2022.  The General Partner will continue to reassess the funding of limited partner distributions throughout 20212022 and will continue to waive certain fees if the General Partner determines it is in the best interest of the Partnership to do so.  If available cash flow or net disposition proceeds are insufficient to cover the Partnership expenses and liabilities on a short and long-term basis, the Partnership may attempt to obtain additional funds by disposing of or refinancing equipment, or by borrowing within its permissible limits.

The General Partner will continue to reassess the funding of limited partner distributions throughout 2021 and will continue to waive certain fees. If available cash flow or net disposition proceeds are insufficient to cover the Partnership expenses and liabilities on a short and long-term basis, the Partnership may attempt to obtain additional funds by disposing of or refinancing equipment, or by borrowing within its permissible limits.  Additionally, the Partnership will seek to enhance portfolio returns and maximize cash flow through the use of leveraged lease transactions: the acquisition of lease equipment through debt financing.  This strategy allows the General Partner to acquire additional revenue generating leases without the use of investor funds thus maximizing overall return.

Three months ended March 31, 20212022 compared to three months ended March 31, 2020

Our lease revenue decreased to approximately $46,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2022, from approximately $61,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2021, from approximately $88,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2020.2021. This revenue decrease is primarily due to a decrease in active lease agreements as described below.

The Partnership had 2815 and 5328 active operating leases during the three months ended March 31, 20212022 and 2020,2021, respectively. The decrease in number of active leases is consistent with the overall decrease in lease revenue. Management expects to add new leases to our portfolio throughout the remainder of 2021,2022, funded primarily through debt financing.  As the operational phase of the Partnership has been extended to December 31, 2021, Management will continue to seek lease opportunities to enhance portfolio returns and cash flow.

Our operating expenses, excluding depreciation, primarily consist of accounting and legal fees, outside service fees and reimbursement of expenses to CCC for administration and operation of the Partnership.  These expenses decreased to approximately $44,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2022, from approximately $75,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2021, from approximately $86,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2020.2021.  This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in legalaccounting fees of approximately $7,000 and other LP$38,000, partially offset by an increase in temporary services expenses of approximately $5,000.

Depreciation expenses consist of depreciation on equipment.  This expense decreased to approximately $18,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2022, from $34,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2021, from $49,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2020.2021.  This decrease was due to the higher frequency in the termination of leases and equipment being fully depreciated as compared to the acquisition of new leases for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, we recognized revenue of approximately $47,000, expenses of approximately $63,000, resulting in net loss of approximately $16,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2021, we recognized revenue of approximately $63,000, expenses of approximately $116,000, resulting in net loss of approximately $53,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we recognized revenue of approximately $116,000, expenses of approximately $118,000, resulting in net loss of approximately $2,000. This change to a net loss is due to the changes in revenue and expenses described above.

N/A

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures related to our reporting and disclosure obligations as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, the General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2021,2022, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information relating to us which is required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including the General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during the firstfiscal quarter of 2021ended March 31, 2022 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.

N/A

FINRA

The decision of the Hearing Panel was stayed when it was appealed to FINRA'sFINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (the “NAC”) pursuant to FINRA Rule 9311.  The NAC issued a decision that upheld the lower panel’s ruling and the bar took effect on August 23, 2016.  Ms. Springsteen-Abbott appealed the NAC’s decision to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  On March 31, 2017, the SEC criticized that decision as so flawed that the SEC could not even review it, and remanded the matter back to FINRA for further consideration consistent with the SEC’s remand, but did not suggest any view as to a particular outcome.

On July 21, 2017, FINRA reduced the list of 1,840 items totaling $208,000 to a remaining list of 87 items totaling $36,226 (which includes approximately $30,000 of continuing education expenses for personnel providing services to the Funds), and reduced the proposed fine from $100,000 to $50,000, but reaffirmed its position on the bar from the securities industry.  Respondents promptly appealed FINRA’s revised ruling to the SEC.  All the requested or allowed briefs have been filed with the SEC.  Despite offering no additional evidence or legal reasoning from when SEC originally remanded this matter (for FINRA’s opinion being an unreviewably flawed opinion), the SEC upheld FINRA’s new order on February 7, 2020 as to bar, but eliminatedthe bar; however, FINRA’s proposed fine.fine was voided.  Ms. Springsteen-Abbott has filed a Petition for Review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review a final order entered against her by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  On February 26, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, made their ruling.  They dismissed in part and denied in part Ms. Springsteen-Abbott’s petition. This was regardless of CCC’s good faith reimbursements made many years ago of the questioned expense items of $208,000 (due to improper documentation), initially claimed misallocations by FINRA, even prior to FINRA’s reducing its final claim to $36,226.

Prior to the original appeal to the SEC, Ms. Springsteen-Abbott discovered CCC’s required documentation of these items for FINRA review, which FINRA refused to consider, despite such efforts the District Court upheld the bar, despite admittingly not addressing her “due process” rights, for legal administrative procedural reasons.  However, given the SEC’s prior removal of FINRA’s fine and the District Court upholding that removal, the General Partner anticipates that this ruling will not result in any material financial impact to the Funds.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The amount of revenue recognized and the pattern of revenue recognition may be impacted by COVID-19. SomeIn December 2019, a strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, and has spread globally, and on March 12, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic. In an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, many countries, including the United States, have imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel, quarantines, and other public health safety measures. Such government-imposed precautionary measures may have been relaxed in certain countries or states, but there is no assurance that more strict measures will be put in place again due to a resurgence in COVID-19 cases. In addition, the COVID-19 virus and other infectious diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, resulting in an economic downturn that could impact the Company’s business, sectors that we service such as education centers, medical facilities, payroll administrators, manufacturingfinancial condition, and transportation, we may need to account for returns and refund liabilities.results of operations. The pattern of revenue recognition may change for delays in rendering services.

In periods ended subsequent to the outbreak of COVID-19, the impact on expected credit losses and future cash flow projections used in impairment testing will need to be considered.

The CompanyPartnership continues to evaluate whether adjustments to the financial statements are required or whether additional disclosures are necessary.  In our leasing business, the Company is always subject to credit losses as it relates to a customer’s ability to make timely rental payments.  The impact of COVID-19 may contribute to risk of non-performance, where a customer may experience financial difficulty and may delay in making timely payments.

The CompanyPartnership recognizes impairment of receivables and loans when losses are incurred, which is when it is probable that an entity will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the arrangement.  Impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the receivable’s or loans effective interest rate, except that, as a practical expedient, impairment can be measured based on a receivable’s or loans’ observable market price or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

The CompanyPartnership believes its estimate of expected losses have been recognized based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts.  The impacts of COVID-19 may necessitate additional adjustments in future forecasts of expected losses.

Although the Partnership cannot estimate the length or gravity of the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak at this time, if the pandemic continues, it may have a material adverse effect on the Partnership results of future operations, financial position, and liquidity in fiscal year 20212022 and beyond.

N/A

N/A

N/A

NONE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.