Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

2021

or

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to


v471975_img01.jpg

Commission File Number: 001-37758

moleculinlogoresizedclear.jpg

MOLECULIN BIOTECH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

 

2834

 

47-4671997

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification Number)

5300 Memorial Drive,

 Suite 950

2575 West Bellfort, Suite 333

Houston, TX

 TX77054

77007

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

713-300-5160
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

713-300-5160

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

☒No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted to its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Registration S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

☒No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitiondefinitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and large accelerated filer”“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company x

Accelerated filer ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes ¨ No ý

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol (s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

MBRX

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

The registrant had 21,136,059had 28,577,088 shares of common stock outstanding at November 1, 2017.3, 2021.




Moleculin Biotech, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

Table of Contents

Page

3

Item 1.

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2021 (unaudited) and December 31, 2020

3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)

4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)

5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)

6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

7

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

13

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

19

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

19

 
 

  

Item 1.

20

  

Item 1A.

20

  

Item 2.

20

  

Item 3.

20

  

Item 4.

20

  

Item 5.

20

  

Item 6.

21

  
 

Signatures

22



PART 1.1 FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.
Statements

Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except for parshare and per share amounts)data)

(unaudited)

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 
(Unaudited)  
 

2021

  

2020

 
Assets 
      
Current assets: 
  
 
Cash and cash equivalents$8,736
 $5,007
 $75,178  $15,173 
Prepaid expenses and other727
 215

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  1,892   2,025 
Total current assets9,463
 5,222
 77,070  17,198 
   
Furniture and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $14 and $6, respectively22
 23

Furniture and equipment, net

 353  483 
Intangible assets11,148
 11,148
 11,148  11,148 

Operating lease right-of-use asset

  131   202 
Total assets$20,633
 $16,393
 $88,702  $29,031 
    
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity 
  
    
Current liabilities: 
  
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$1,089
 $1,069
Convertible notes payable
 276
Warranty liability743
 

Accounts payable

 $1,390  $1,129 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  2,266   1,791 
Total current liabilities1,832
 1,345
 3,656  2,920 
   
Long-term deferred compensation – related party150
 88

Operating lease liability - long-term, net of current portion

 75  159 

Warrant liability - long-term

  3,712   8,192 
Total liabilities1,982
 1,433
 7,443  11,271 
   
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
 
       
   
Stockholders’ equity 
  
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized, 20,822,214 issued outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 12,164,852 issued and outstanding at December 31, 201621
 12

Stockholders' equity

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

 0  0 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 28,577,088 and 11,536,720 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively

 29  69 
Additional paid-in capital29,925
 19,623
 151,175  74,671 

Subscription Receivable

 0  (129)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 39  65 
Accumulated deficit(11,295) (4,675)  (69,984)  (56,916)
Total stockholders’ equity18,651
 14,960
  81,259   17,760 
   
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$20,633
 $16,393
 $88,702  $29,031 

See accompanying notes to theunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)
and Comprehensive Loss

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

data)

(unaudited)

 

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 

Revenues

 $0  $0  $0  $0 
                 

Operating expenses:

                

Research and development

  4,095   4,435   11,239   10,971 

General and administrative

  2,021   1,659   6,394   5,122 

Depreciation and amortization

  41   57   130   154 

Total operating expenses

  6,157   6,151   17,763   16,247 

Loss from operations

  (6,157)  (6,151)  (17,763)  (16,247)

Other income:

                

Gain from change in fair value of warrant liability

  1,678   2,743   4,428   1,489 

Other income, net

  13   10   30   32 

Interest income, net

  87   3   236   10 

Net loss

 $(4,379) $(3,395) $(13,069) $(14,716)
                 

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

 $(0.15) $(0.33) $(0.50) $(1.55)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

  28,573,476   10,245,810   26,302,638   9,496,585 
                 

Net Loss

 $(4,379) $(3,395) $(13,069) $(14,716)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

                

Foreign currency translation

  (16)  10   (26)  2 

Comprehensive loss

 $(4,395) $(3,385) $(13,095) $(14,714)
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues$
 $
 $
 $
        
Operating expenses: 
  
  
  
Research and development1,061
 497
 2,260
 616
General and administrative1,338
 924
 2,987
 1,848
Depreciation5
 1
 13
 2
Total operating expenses2,404
 1,422
 5,260
 2,466
        
Loss from operations(2,404) (1,422) (5,260) (2,466)
        
Other income (expense): 
  
  
  
Loss from change in fair value of warrant liability(470) 
 (2,753) 
Gain from settlement of liability
 
 149
 
Gain from expiration of warrants
 
 1,238
 
Other income9
 
 8
 
Interest expense(1) (10) (2) (37)
        
Net loss$(2,866) $(1,432) $(6,620) $(2,503)
        
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted$(0.14) $(0.12) $(0.37) $(0.28)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted20,534,720
 11,579,239
 17,683,441
 9,066,804

See accompanying notes to theunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 
  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(13,069) $(14,716)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  130   154 

Stock-based compensation

  1,817   1,265 

Change in fair value of warrant liability

  (4,428)  (1,489)

Operating lease, net

  102   90 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  133   294 

Accounts payable

  261   (810)

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  361   565 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (14,693)  (14,647)

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Purchase of fixed assets

  0   (360)

Net cash used in investing activities

  0   (360)

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Proceeds from exercise of warrants

  63   5 

Payment of tax liability for vested restricted stock units

  (24)  (17)

Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs

  74,685   17,077 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  74,724   17,065 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (26)  2 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

  60,005   2,060 

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period

  15,173   10,735 

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period

 $75,178  $12,795 
         

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid for taxes

 $11  $20 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

        

Purchases of property and equipment in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 $0  $316 
 Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net loss$(6,620) $(2,503)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: 
  
Depreciation13
 2
Stock-based compensation487
 209
Deferred CEO compensation62
 88
Change in fair value of warrant liability2,753
 
Gain in settlement of liability(149) 
Gain from expiration of warrants(1,238) 
Other(9) 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: 
  
Prepaid expenses(518) (245)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses285
 (147)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities(4,934) (2,596)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: 
  
Purchase of fixed assets(12) (10)
Purchase paid for acquisition of Moleculin, LLC, net with cash acquired
 (100)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(12) (110)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: 
  
Proceeds from notes payable
 165
Payments on note payable
 (470)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants3,808
 
Proceeds from sale of common stock units, net of cash stock issuance costs4,867
 9,167
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities8,675
 8,862
Net change in cash and cash equivalents3,729
 6,156
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period5,007
 28
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period$8,736
 $6,184
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: 
  
Cash paid for interest$2
 $48
Cash paid for income taxes$
 $
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: 
  
Common stock issued for conversion of debt$302
 $342
Common stock issued for services provided$89
 $
Common stock issued to acquire Moleculin, LLC$
 $9,774

See accompanying notes to theunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except for shares and per unit)


 Common Stock      
 Number Amount 
Additional
Paid-In-Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 201612,164,852
 $12
 $19,623
 $(4,675) $14,960
          
Issued for cash – sale of units at $1.35 per unit, net of stock issuance costs of $5503,710,000
 4
 313
   317
Warrants exercised, net of issuance costs of $802,703,434
 3
 8,753
  
 8,756
Issued for cash - sale of common stock in ATM offering, net of issuance costs of $47154,121
 
 360
   360
Stock-based compensation 
   487
   487
Issued for convertible debt2,010,640
 2
 300
   302
Issued for settlement of service79,167
 
 89
   89
Net loss 
     (6,620) (6,620)
Balance at September 30, 201720,822,214
 $21
 $29,925
 $(11,295) $18,651
shares)

(unaudited)

 
  

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021

 
  

Common Stock

  

Common Stock Subscribed

        Accumulated        
  

Shares

  

Par Value Amount

  

Shares

  

Par Value Amount

  

Additional Paid-In Capital

  

Accumulated Deficit

  

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

  

Subscription Receivable

  

Stockholder's Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

  11,536,720  $69   26,966  $0  $74,671  $(56,916) $65  $(129) $17,760 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $6,159

  16,883,420   18   (26,966)  0   74,537   0   0   129   74,684 

Reverse stock split

  14,285   (60)  0   0   60   0   0   0   0 

Warrants exercised

  10,000   1   0   0   115   0   0   0   116 

Stock-based compensation

     0      0   405   0   0   0   405 

Consolidated net loss

     0      0   0   (4,445)  0   0   (4,445)

Cumulative translation adjustment

     0      0   0   0   (4)  0   (4)

Balance, March 31, 2021

  28,444,425  $28   0  $0  $149,788  $(61,361) $61  $0  $88,516 

Issuance of common stock in connection with equity purchase agreement, net of issuance costs of $403

  107,788   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   1 

Subscription of common stock in connection with Consulting Agreement

  0   0   2,500   0   10   0   0   (10)  0 

Stock-based compensation

     0      0   433   0   0   0   433 

Consolidated net loss

     0      0   0   (4,244)  0   0   (4,244)

Cumulative translation adjustment

     0      0   0   0   (6)  0   (6)

Balance, June 30, 2021

  28,552,213  $29   2,500  $0  $150,231  $(65,605) $55  $(10) $84,700 

Issuance of common stock in connection with Consulting Agreement

  3,750   0   (2,500)  0   (10)  0   0   10   0 

Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted stock units (net of shares withheld for payment of tax liability)

  21,125   0   0   0   (23)  0   0   0   (23)

Stock-based compensation

     0      0   977   0   0   0   977 

Consolidated net loss

     0      0   0   (4,379)  0   0   (4,379)

Cumulative translation adjustment

     0      0   0   0   (16)  0   (16)

Balance, September 30, 2021

  28,577,088  $29   0  $0  $151,175  $(69,984) $39  $0  $81,259 

  

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020

 
  

Common Stock

  

Common Stock Subscribed

        

Accumulated

        
  

Shares

  

Par Value Amount

  

Shares

  

Par Value Amount

  

Additional Paid-In Capital

  

Accumulated Deficit

  

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

  

Subscription Receivable

  

Stockholders' Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2019

  7,621,338  $46   0  $0  $55,055  $(39,561) $31  $0  $15,571 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $709

  1,250,000   7   0   0   559   0   0   0   566 

Stock-based compensation

     0      0   397   0   0   0   397 

Consolidated net loss

     0      0   0   (1,209)  0   0   (1,209)

Cumulative translation adjustment

     0      0   0   0   (33)  0   (33)

Balance, March 31, 2020

  8,871,338  $53   0  $0  $56,011  $(40,770) $(2) $0  $15,292 

Issued for cash - sale of common stock, net of issuance costs of $336

  1,195,162   7   0   0   10,000   0   0   0   10,007 

Warrants exercised

  750   0   0   0   9   0   0   0   9 

Stock-based compensation

     0      0   408   0   0   0   408 

Consolidated net loss

     0      0   0   (10,112)  0   0   (10,112)

Cumulative translation adjustment

     0      0   0   0   25   0   25 

Balance, June 30, 2020

  10,067,250  $60   0  $0  $66,428  $(50,882) $23  $0  $15,629 

Issued for cash - sale of common stock, net of issuance costs of $135

  216,855   2   0   0   1,778   0   0   0   1,780 

Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted stock units (net of shares withheld for payment of tax liability)

  9,990   0   0   0   (17)  0   0   0   (17)

Stock-based compensation

     0      0   460   0   0   0   460 

Consolidated net loss

     0      0   0   (3,395)  0   0   (3,395)

Cumulative translation adjustment

     0      0   0   0   10   0   10 

Balance, September 30, 2020

  10,294,095  $62   0  $0  $68,649  $(54,277) $33  $0  $14,467 

See accompanying notes to theunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

1. Nature of Business and Liquidity

The terms “MBI”"MBI" or the “Company”"the Company", “we”"we", “our”"our", and “us”"us" are used herein to refer to Moleculin Biotech, Inc. MBI is a clinical stageclinical-stage pharmaceutical company, organized as a Delaware corporation in July 2015 to2015. The Company's focus is on the treatment of highly resistant cancers and viruses through the development of anti-cancerits drug candidates. These candidates some of which are based substantially on license agreements withdiscoveries licensed from The University of Texas System on behalf of the M.D.MD Anderson Cancer Center, which we refer to as MD Anderson.


We currently have four MBI formed Moleculin Australia Pty. Ltd., (MAPL), a wholly owned subsidiary in June 2018, to perform certain preclinical development in Australia. This has enabled the Company to realize the benefits of certain research and development tax credits in Australia. In July 2021, MBI formed Moleculin Amsterdam B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary, primarily to act as its legal representative for clinical trials in Europe for Moleculin Biotech, Inc. 

In 2019, the Company sublicensed essentially all of the rights to its technologies in 29 countries in Europe and Asia to WPD Pharmaceuticals Sp.z o.o. (WPD or WPD Pharmaceuticals) in exchange for a minimum amount of externally funded collaboration on development in Europe over a certain amount of time. Also in 2019, the Company sublicensed its technologies to Animal Life Sciences, Inc. (ALI), to enable research and commercialization for non-human use and share development data. As part of this agreement, ALI issued to the Company a 10% interest in ALI.

The Company has three core technologies: 1) Annamycin, which the Company refers to as a "next generation" anthracycline; 2) a portfolio of Immune/Transcription Modulators, of which WP1066 is one of the lead molecules; and 3) a portfolio of Metabolism/Glycosylation Inhibitors, of which WP1122 is the lead molecule. The Company has five drug candidates, representing all three substantially different approaches to treating cancer. Liposomal Annamycin, which we refer to as Annamycin, is a chemotherapy designed to inhibit the replication core technologies, and three of DNA of rapidly dividing cells. WP1122 is an inhibitor of glycolysis intended to cutthose have shown human activity in clinical trials. As of the fuel supplyend of tumor cells, which2020, those three drug candidates accounted for five clinical trials in the United States (U.S.) and Europe. Two of those trials are often overly dependent on glycolysis as compared to healthy cells. And, finally, externally funded studies of WP1066 and WP1220, have shown capability, in in vivo testing, of altering the cell signaling associated withbrain tumors.


Two internally funded Phase 1 clinical trials, Annamycin is an anthracycline being studied for the treatment of relapsed or refractoryin acute myeloid leukemia or AML.(AML), and WP1220 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), were successfully concluded. An additional internally funded Phase 1/2 clinical trial of Annamycin in AML is currently ongoing in Poland. In August 2015,the second quarter of 2021, the Company acquiredcommenced enrollment and dosed the rights and prior development data regarding Annamycin and the prior Annamycin investigative new drug application (“IND”) with thefirst subject in its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), including all trade secrets, know-how, confidential information and other intellectual property rights. Annamycin had been in clinical trials pursuant to an IND filed with the FDA by a prior drug developer, which was terminated when that developer ceased activity for financial reasons. Our review of that prior clinical data leads us to believe that Annamycin may have greater potential for efficacy and safety in relapsed or refractory AML patients than currently available therapies.

Because the prior developer of Annamycin allowed their IND to lapse, we were required to submit a new IND for continued clinical trials with Annamycin, which the FDA was allowed to proceed on September 22, 2017. The Company announced on October 3, 2017 that it had signed an agreement with a hospital in Poland to participate in this trial, which will be our first clinical site, assuming the receipt of regulatory approval in Poland. The data presented in our successful IND submission to FDA were submitted to Polish regulatory authorities on October 23, 2017, in support of our request for Clinical Trial Authorization (“CTA”) in that country. Depending on the timing of the CTA approval, we could begin treating patients in a Phase I/II1b/2 clinical trial as early as late December of 2017. The Phase I dose-ranging portion of this trial is designed to establish a new Recommended Phase 2 Dosage, or RP2D, which we believe was not adequately explored in previous trials.

The Annamycin drug substance is no longer covered by any existing patent protection. On July 18, 2017, the Company announced that it had signed a new technology license agreement with MD Anderson Cancer Center based on new patent applications that the Company intends to file relating to Annamycin. These patent applications are related to the formulation, synthetic process and reconstitution related to our Annamycin drug product candidate, although there is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such patent protection.
On March 21, 2017, we received notice that the FDA had granted us Orphan Drug designation forevaluating Annamycin for the treatment of AML. Orphan Drug status could entitle us to market exclusivity of up to 7 and 10 years fromsoft tissue sarcoma (STS) lung metastases. Enrollment in that trial is also ongoing. The Company anticipates that the date of approval of a New Drug Application (“NDA”)externally funded WP1066 trial in the United States. If we obtain similar designation in the European Union (“EU”), we could be entitled to 10 years of market exclusivity there from the date of approval of a Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”) in the United States and the European Union (“EU”), respectively. Separately, the FDA may also grant market exclusivity of up to 5 years with the approval of an active moiety (a “new chemical entity,” which we anticipate Annamycin would be), but there can be no assurance that such exclusivitybrain tumors at MD Anderson will be granted.

Our other drug development projects relateterminated this year and expects to two distinct portfolioscommence a similar WP1066 externally funded trial elsewhere in 2022.

Additionally, MBI expects a second, grant funded Phase 1b/2 clinical trial of small molecules, which we referAnnamycin in STS lung metastases to as the WP1066 Portfolio, focused on the modulationbe primarily investigator-funded in Poland. MBI also plans to begin a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of key oncogenic transcription factors involvedAnnamycin in the progression of cancer, and the WP1122 Portfolio, a suite of molecules targeting the metabolic processes involved in cancer in general, and glioblastoma (the most common form of brain tumor) and pancreatic cancer in particular. We have been granted royalty-bearing, worldwide, exclusive licenses for the patent and technology rights related to our WP1066 Portfolio and WP1122 Portfolio drug technologies, as these patent rights are owned by MD Anderson.


During 2017, the Company announced the following progress on these two portfolios: 1) that it engaged a contract research organization (“CRO”) to prepare for a proof-of-concept trial in Poland to study the Company's drug candidate WP1220 (part of the WP1066 portfolio described above)combination with Ara-C for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; 2) AML in Europe by seeking approval for its own clinical trial and, possibly, a second, similar grant funded trial through its sublicensee, WPD Pharmaceuticals in Poland. In October 2021, the Company entered into collaborative agreementsreceived authorization from regulatory authorities in the United Kingdom (U.K.) to commence a Phase 1a clinical trial of WP1122 in healthy volunteers with the Universityintent to progress to COVID-19 patients either there or in locations where the prevalence of BergenCOVID-19 will adequately support recruitment. The Company intends to internally fund the initial trials of WP1122 but may seek external funding opportunities if encouraging activity is seen in Norway to test WP1122 in combination with another drugCOVID-19 patients. Additionally, the Company is pursuing filing an Investigative New Drug application (IND) in the treatment


of brain tumors and separately to conduct further analysis on the capability of WP1066 to stimulate anti-tumor immune response: 3) the Company entered into an agreementU.S. with the Mayo Clinic to study WP1066WP1122 for the treatment of rare pediatric brain tumors: and 4)certain cancers prior to the end of 2021. Finally, the Company agreedcontinues to assist MD Andersonseek opportunities to collaborate on a potential Phase 2 clinical study of WP1220 in submitting an INDCTCL.

The Company does not have manufacturing facilities and all manufacturing activities are contracted out to third parties. Additionally, the Company does not have a sales organization. The Company’s overall strategy is to seek potential outlicensing opportunities with development/commercialization strategic partners who are better suited for the studymarketing, sales and distribution of WP1066its drugs, if approved.

COVID-19 and Worldwide Supply Chain Issues - In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the world. The spread of COVID-19 has caused significant volatility in glioblastomaU.S. and melanomainternational markets, including Poland, where MBI conducts some of its clinical trials and Italy, where its Annamycin drug supply is produced. There has been limited interruption of its drug supply, and most Polish clinics where the Company is conducting trials are limiting access for monitoring activities. Additionally, MBI believes COVID-19 materially slowed the recruitment of patients for its clinical trials, but it is now beginning to see an increase in recruitment. This could worsen or be alleviated at any time. Furthermore, there is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as its impact on the U.S. and international economies and, as such, the Company is unable to determine if it will have a material impact to its operations. Additionally, the Company believes that has metastasizedthe potential for impact to its supply chain due to COVID-19 will be reduced as vaccine production normalizes throughout the industry. In the third quarter, worldwide supply chain issues began delaying certain shipments. The supply chain for the manufacturing of the Company's drug candidates and supplies for clinical trials can be complicated and involves several parties. If the Company were to experience any supply chain issues, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company's product supply could be disrupted. The Company believes that its operations have not been materially impacted to date. In view of current worldwide trends with respect to COVID-19 and worldwide supply chain issues, MBI does not expect either issue to materially further impact recruitment for or the operation of current or future clinical trials. However, the Company cannot be certain that these trends will continue and there is the possibility they may reverse.

2. Basis of presentation, principles of consolidation, significant accounting policies and liquidity

Reverse Stock Split - On January 29, 2021, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the brain, which MD Anderson filed on November 1, 2017.


In accordanceamended and restated certificate of incorporation with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, we view our operationsthe Secretary of State and manage our businessthe State of Delaware to effect a reverse stock split of all the issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock at a ratio of 1 for 6. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the reverse stock split for all periods presented. Certain amounts in the financial statements, the notes thereto, and elsewhere in the Form 10-Q may be slightly different than previously reported due to rounding up of fractional shares as principally one segment. As a result of the financial information disclosed herein represents all the material financial information related to our principal operating segment.






2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
reverse stock split.

Basis of Presentation – Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Information - The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”)(U.S. GAAP) for financial information, and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United StatesU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)(SEC) with respect to Form 10-Q10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These interim condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from July 28, 2015 (inception) to December 31, 20152020 and notes thereto contained in the Form 10-K10-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2017.March 24, 2021.

7

Principles of Consolidation - The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to U.S. GAAP. The Company views its operations and manages its business in one operating segment. All long-lived assets of the Company reside in the U.S.

Significant Accounting Policies - The Company's significant accounting policies are described in Note 2,Basis of Presentation, principles of consolidation and significant accounting policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. There have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2021, other than those noted below.

Use of Estimates in Financial Statement Presentation - The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Going Concern Management considers many factors in selecting appropriate financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of these financial statements. Management must apply significant judgment in this process. In addition, other factors may affect estimates, including expected business and operational changes, sensitivity and volatility associated with the assumptions used in developing estimates, and whether historical trends are expected to be representative of future trends. The estimation process often may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future outcomes and management must select an amount that falls within that range of reasonable estimates. This process may result in actual results differing materially from those estimated amounts used in the preparation of financial statements. Estimates are used in the following areas, among others: fair value estimates on intangible assets, warrants, and stock-based compensation expense, as well as accrued expenses and taxes. 

Liquidity and Financial Condition - These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes The Company is an early stage and emerging growth company (EGC) and has not generated any revenues to date. As such, the Company will continueis subject to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The continuationall of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operationsrisks associated with early stage and the attainment of profitable operations. As of September 30, 2017,emerging growth companies. Since inception, the Company has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operating activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company incurred net losses of $13.1 million an$14.7 million, respectively, and had net cash flows used in operating activities o$14.7 million and $14.6 million, respectively. At September 30, 2021, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $11.3$70.0 million since inception,and cash and had not yet generated any revenue from operations. Additionally, management anticipates thatcash equivalents of $75.2 million. The Company expects its cash on hand as of September 30, 2017 is2021 will be sufficient to fund its plannedthe Company's operations into but not beyond the near term. These factors raise substantial doubt regardingSuch projections are subject to changes in the Company’s internally funded preclinical and clinical activities, including unplanned preclinical and clinical activity. The Company does not expect to experience positive cash flows from operating activities in the near future and anticipates incurring operating losses for the next few years as it supports the development of its core technologies to the point of generating revenue, most likely via outlicensing, and continues to invest in research and development for additional applications of the Company's core technologies and potentially increase its pipeline of drug candidates. If the Company needs to raise additional capital in order to continue to execute its business plan, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or that management will be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to the Company. A failure to raise sufficient capital could adversely impact the Company's ability to continueachieve its intended business objectives and meet its financial obligations as they become due and payable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a going concern. Theseconcentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash accounts principally at one financial statements do institution in the U.S., which at times, may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s limit. The Company has not include experienced any adjustmentslosses from cash balances in excess of the insurance limit. The Company’s management does not believe the Company is exposed to significant credit risk at this time due to the recoverability and classificationfinancial condition of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company may seek additional funding through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, commercialization, marketing and distribution arrangements, other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements and delay plannedfinancial institution where its cash outlays or a combination thereof. Management cannot be certain that such events or a combination thereof can be achieved.

is held.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - OurThe Company's financial instruments consist primarily of account payables,non-trade receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and aits warrant liability. The carrying amount of non-trade receivables, accounts payablespayable, and accrued expenses approximates their fair value because of the short-term maturity of such.

We have

The Company has categorized ourits assets and liabilities that are valued at fair value on a recurring basis into three-levela three-level fair value hierarchy in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1)1) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3)3).

Assets and liabilities recorded in the balance sheets at fair value are categorized based on a hierarchy of inputs as follows:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets of identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include the fair value of our warrant liability discussed in Note 4. The fair value of this warrant liability is included in current liabilities on the accompanying financial statements as of September 30, 2017, as warrants are currently being exercised.



The following table provides the financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value and measured on a recurring basis at September 30, 2017:

In thousands
Description 
Liabilities
Measured at Fair
Value
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Other
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Fair value of warrant liability:  
  
  
  
2017 $743
 $
 $
 $743

2021 and December 31, 2020 (in thousands): 

Description

 

Fair Value

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Fair value of warrant liability as of September 30, 2021:

 $3,712  $0  $0  $3,712 

Fair value of warrant liability as of December 31, 2020:

 $8,192  $0  $0  $8,192 

The following table provides a summarybelow of Level 3 liabilities (in thousands) begins with the valuation as of the beginning of the third quarter and then is adjusted for changes in fair value associated with the Level 3 liabilities for the quarter ended September 30, 2017:

In thousands
 
Warrant
Liability –
Current
 
Warrant
Liability –
Long-Term
 
Warrant
Liability –
Total
Balance, June 30, 2017$1,185
 $
 $1,185
Reclass of liability from long-term to current
 
 
Change in fair value - net470
 
 470
Expiration of warrants
 
 
Transfer in and out (exercise of warrants)(912) 
 (912)
      
Balance, September 30, 2017$743
 $
 $743
The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value associated with the Level 3 liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:
In thousands
 
Warrant
Liability –
Current
 
Warrant
Liability –
Long-Term
 
Warrant
Liability –
Total
Balance, beginning of period December 31, 2016$
 $
 $
Issuances of warrants2,453
 1,690
 4,143
Reclass of liability from long-term to current1,846
 (1,846) 
Change in fair value - net2,848
 (95) 2,753
Transfers in and out (exercise of warrants)(5,166) 251
 (4,915)
Expiration of warrants(1,238) 
 (1,238)
      
Balance, September 30, 2017$743
 $
 $743

 The above table of Level 3 liabilities begins with the initial valuation given the issuances occurred in the first quarter of 2017 and adjusts the balances for changes that occurred during the current quarter and priorthird quarter. The ending balance of the Level 3 financial instrument presented above represent ourrepresents the Company's best estimates and may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2021

 

Warrant Liability Long-Term

  

Warrant Liability Total

 

Balance, June 30, 2021

 $5,390  $5,390 

Change in fair value - net

  (1,678)  (1,678)

Balance, September 30, 2021

 $3,712  $3,712 

8



The table below of Level 3 liabilities (in thousands) begins with the valuations as of December 31, 2020 and is adjusted for the exercises and for changes in fair value that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2021. The ending balance of the Level 3 financial instrument presented above represents the Company's best estimates and may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021

 

Warrant Liability Long-Term

  

Warrant Liability Total

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

 $8,192  $8,192 

Exercise of warrants

  (52)  (52)

Change in fair value - net

  (4,428)  (4,428)

Balance, September 30, 2021

 $3,712  $3,712 

Loss Per Common Share - Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For purposes of this calculation, options to purchase common stock, restricted stock units subject to vesting and warrants to purchase common stock are considered to be common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.antidilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s2021 and 2020, approximately 4.5 millionand approximately 3.8 million, respectively, of potentially dilutive shares which were not included inexcluded from the calculationcomputation of net lossdiluted earnings per share included optionsdue to purchase 670,000 commontheir antidilutive effect. For the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, approximately 4.1 million and 3.4 million, respectively, of potentially dilutive shares and warrantswere excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to purchase 702,576 common shares as inclusion of these securities would have been anti-dilutive. 

Reclassifications – A reclassification was made to the December 31, 2016 financial statements to conform to the 2017 presentation. Such reclassification did not affect net loss as previously reported. Historically, accrued interest associated with “convertible notes payable” was included in the line item “accounts payable and accrued expense”. Management believes that these costs are best shown included in the amounts shown for “convertible notes payable” and, as such, a reclassification was made to the balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2016 by reducing “accounts payable and accrued expenses” and increasing “convertible notes payable” by $0.02 million.
Research and Development Costs - Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
their antidilutive effect.

Subsequent Events - The Company’s management reviewed all material events through the date of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were issued for subsequent events disclosure considerationstatements. See notes and has noted events inspecifically Note 8 below.

- Subsequent Events.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting StandardStandards Update, ("ASU"or ASU, No.2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) 2014-09, Revenue fromand Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) (ASU 2020-06). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the complexity associated with Customers (Topic 606), which will replace numerous requirements inapplying U.S. GAAP for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity, including industry-specific requirements,convertible instruments and provide companies with a single revenue recognition model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflectsentity's own equity. The guidance is effective for the consideration to whichCompany beginning on January 1, 2022 and prescribes different transition methods for the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB approved a proposal to defer the effective date of the guidance until annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.various provisions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have, if any, on its consolidated financial statements at the time the Company starts to generate revenue or enters into other contractual arrangements, which the Company does not expect in the near term.

statements.

In August 2014, May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, PresentationNo.2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt - Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer's Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): DisclosureFreestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options. ASU 2021-04 clarifies certain aspects of Uncertainties aboutthe current guidance to promote consistency among reporting of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under the new guidance, management will be required to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and to provide related footnote disclosuresissuer's accounting for modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. The amendments in certain circumstances. The provisions of this ASUupdate are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter; early adoption is permitted. This disclosure is effective within these financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and thereafter. Such disclosure did not impact the financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effectiveall entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that this standard will have, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). Under ASU 2016-02, an entity will be required to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 offers specific accounting guidance for a lessee, a lessor and sale and leaseback transactions. Lessees and lessors are required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public companies, ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, and requires a modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this standard will have on its financial statements.


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The new guidance changes the accounting and simplifies various aspects of the accounting for share-based payments to employees. The guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur or based on an estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard on January 1, 2017, did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). This ASU applies to all entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. The amendments provide guidance on eight specific cash flow issues and includes clarification on how these items should be classified in the statement of cash flows and is designed to help eliminate diversity in practice as to where items are classified in the cash flow statement. Furthermore, in November 2016, the FASB issued additional guidance on this Topic that requires amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with earlier application permitted for all entities. We plan to adopt the provisions of this ASU for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018 and are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new accounting standard will have on our financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01 "Business Combinations (Topic 805)," which provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this update (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The amendments in this update also narrow the definition of the term "output" so that the term is consistent with how outputs are described in Topic 606. Public business entities are required to apply the amendments in this update to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the effect of the update at the time of any future acquisition or disposal.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)." This update clarifies the existing definition of the term "modification," which is currently defined as "a change in any of the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award." The update requires entities to account for modifications of share-based payment awards unless the (1) fair value, (2) vesting conditions and (3) classification as an equity instrument or a liability instrument of the modified award are the same as of the original award before modification. Public business entities are required to adopt the amendments in this update for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt the update when it becomes effective. The Company is in the process of determining the impact, if any, this adoption will have on its financial statements.

The Company does not believe that any other recently issued effective pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3. Convertible Notes Payable

On various dates from August 31, 2015 through January 19, 2016, each Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following components (in thousands): 

  

September 30, 2021

  

December 31, 2020

 

Accrued research and development

 $1,322  $907 

Accrued legal, regulatory, professional and other

  459   262 

Accrued payroll and bonuses

  350   426 

Operating lease liability - current

  115   118 

Accrued related party

  20   78 

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 $2,266  $1,791 

Additionally, accounts payable includes $48,000 as amended on March 10, 2016, the Company entered into seven unsecured promissory notes with three separate third party investors. Each note bore interest at 8.0% per annum and was to mature on the earlier of September 30, 2016 or the completion of an IPO of the Company’s securities.

2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, for a related party payable. 

 
Since the completion of the IPO occurred prior to September 30, 2016, these notes were to be automatically converted according to their terms into shares of the Company’s common stock at applicable conversion price upon the Company’s IPO to the extent and provided that no holder of these notes was permitted to convert such notes to the extent that the holder or any of its affiliates would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of our common stock after such conversion. Due to this 4.99% limitation, a portion of these notes was not converted at the time of the IPO and the remaining unconverted principal and accrued interest amounts of the effected notes remained outstanding and was converted into shares of our common stock at such time as the 4.99% limitation was met. Until such time as the notes were converted into shares of common stock, the maturity date of the notes was automatically extended and we were not required to repay the notes or the accrued interest relating to the notes in cash.


The IPO was completed on May 31, 2016. On May 31, 2016, pursuant to the conversion feature of the foregoing notes and with restriction of the 4.99% beneficially owned condition limitation, discussed above, the Company issued 1,166,503 common shares in total, reducing convertible debt principal by $0.18 million and accrued interest by $0.02 million. Subsequent to these transactions and through June 30, 2017, an additional 2,920,738 common shares were issued due to the number of common shares outstanding allowing for conversion of additional shares under the 4.99% beneficially owned condition limitation. This reduced the convertible debt principal by $0.3 million and accrued interest by $0.03 million.
On June 22, 2017, pursuant to the conversion feature of the foregoing notes and with restriction of the 4.99% beneficially owned condition limitation discussed above, the Company issued 804,098 common shares in total, which effectively converted all remaining outstanding convertible debt and accrued interest outstanding as of that date. This conversion converted the remaining amount of debt and accrued interest at June 22, 2017 of $0.1 million.

4. Warrant Warrants

Liability

On February 9, 2017, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC, as representative of the several underwriters identified therein (collectively, the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which we sold in a registered public offering (the “Offering”), 3,710,000 units, priced at a public offering price of $1.35 per unit (the closing price that day was $1.50), with each unit consisting of: (i) one share of common stock, (ii) a five-year Series A warrant to purchase 0.50 of a share of common stock, (iii) a 90-day Series B warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and (iv) a five-year Series C warrant to purchase 0.50 of a share of common stock. The Series C warrants in a unit could only be exercised to the extent and in proportion to a holder of the Series C warrants exercising its Series B warrants included in the unit. The Series A and Series C warrant have an exercise price of $1.50 per share of common stock. The Series B warrant had an exercise price of $1.35 per share of common stock.
Under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement, we granted the Underwriters a 45-day option to purchase an additional 556,500 shares of common stock and/or an additional 556,500 warrant combination (comprised of an aggregate of 278,250 Series A warrants, 556,500 Series B warrants and 278,250 Series C warrants), in any combinations thereof, from us to cover over-allotments at the public offering price per share of $1.349 and public offering price per warrant combination of $.001, respectively, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. Upon the closing of the Offering, the Underwriters exercised the over-allotment option with respect to $278,100 warrant combinations. We received approximately $4.5 million in net proceeds from the Offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.
The basis of value is fair value, which is defined pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 to be “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date”. Classified Warrants

The Company estimated the fair value of the Warrants under ASC 820 as of February 14, 2017 for financial reporting purposes. We useduses the Black-Scholes option pricing model (“BSM”) to determine the fair value of its warrants at the Series Adate of issue and Series B Warrants and a Monte Carlo simulation (“MCM”) with regard to the Series C Warrants in consideration of path dependent vesting terms of the contract. Both the BSM and MCM models are acceptable in accordance with GAAP. The BSM requires the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate, and the weighted average term of the Warrant. The MCM simulates the Company’s common stock price from the valuation date through the Series B Warrant and the unvested Series C Warrant expiration dates using Geometric Browman Motion on a risk-neutral basis – thereby impacting the likelihood that the Series B Warrants would have been exercised and, subsequently, the Series C Warrants would then vest. As disclosed, all Series B and unvested Series C warrants expired on May 15, 2017.

outstanding at each reporting date. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates on zero coupon U.S. Treasury bonds whoselinearly interpolated to obtain a maturity period is appropriate forcommensurate with the term of the Warrants and is calculated by using the average daily historical stock prices through the day preceding the grant date.
warrants. Estimated volatility is a measure of the amount by which ourthe Company's stock price is expected to fluctuate each year during the expected life of the Warrants. Where appropriate, we usedwarrants. Beginning in 2020, only the historical volatility of peer entities due to the lackCompany's own stock is used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model as it now has sufficient historic data in its stock price. 

9





The assumptions used in determining the BSM and MCM models forfair value of the Warrantsliability classified warrants are as follows:

  Nine Months Ended

September 30, 20172021

 Year Ended

December 31,
2016 2020

Risk-free interest rate

 1.68%-1.86%0.0% to 0.7% 0.1% to 0.3%

Volatility

 80.00%-160.11%41.2% to 123.1% 113.7% to 127.4%

Expected life (years)

 0.5-5.00.4 to 3.9 1.1 to 4.6

Dividend yield

 

—%

 

%


A summary of our Warrantthe Company's liability classified warrant activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and related information follows:


Description 
Number of
Shares Under
Warrant
 
Range of
Warrant Price
per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life (Years)
Balance at January 1, 2017 
 
 
 
Granted 8,235,923
 $1.35-$1.50
 $1.43
 1.6
Exercised (2,703,434) 
 $1.46
 
Expired (5,087,717) 
 $1.40
 
Balance at September 30, 2017 444,772
 
 $1.46
 4.63
Vested and Exercisable at September 30, 2017 444,772
 $1.35-$1.50
 $1.46
 4.63

Warrant Activity During 2017:

On February 14, 2017, 8,235,923 Warrants were granted, as discussed above.
On March 24, 2017, 596,300 Series B Warrants were exercised for an equivalent amount

  

Number of Shares

  

Range of Warrant Exercise

  

Weighted Average

  

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual

 
  

Under Warrant

  

Price per Share

  

Exercise Price

  

Life (Years)

 

Balance at January 1, 2021

  2,733,645  $6.30  $16.80  $9.45   3.6 

Granted

  0   0   0   0    

Exercised

  (10,000)  6.30   6.30   6.30    

Expired

  0             

Balance at September 30, 2021

  2,723,645  $6.30  $16.80  $9.46   2.9 

Exercisable at September 30, 2021

  2,723,645  $6.30  $16.80  $9.46   2.9 

For a summary of common shares which vested 298,150 Series C Warrants.

On March 31, 2017, the Warrants were revalued with a fair value determination of $3.08 million which included a fair value adjustment of $1.06 million which was included as a gain from the changechanges in fair value ofassociated with the Company's warrant liability in “Other Income” infor the accompanying financial statements.
On May 15, 2017, approximately 3.4 million and 1.7 million Series B and Series C Warrants, respectively, expired, which reduced our warrant liability by $1.24 million in the accompanying financial statements.
On June 28, 2017, 1,295,995 Series A Warrants were exercised. On the same date, 295,650 Series C Warrants were exercised.
On June 30, 2017, 12,250 Series A Warrants were exercised.
On June 30, 2017, the Warrants were revalued with a fair value determination of $1.2 million which included a fair value adjustment of $3.3 million which was included as loss from the change in fair value of warrant liability in “Other income (expense)” in the accompanying financial statements.

During the quarternine months ended September 30, 2017, 500,739 Series A warrants2021, see Note 2 - Basis of presentation, principles of consolidation and 2,500 Series C warrants were exercised with cash proceedssignificant accounting policies - Fair Value of approximately $0.8 million.
Series B and Series CFinancial Instruments.

Equity Classified Warrants

The Series B Warrants and the unvested Series C Warrants expired May 15, 2017. Therefore, the associated warranty liability of $1.24 million was extinguished on May 15, 2017 as no other Series B Warrants were exercised prior to that date.




5. Equity
On May 2, 2016,

In April 2021, the Company amended and restated its certificate of incorporationgranted equity-classified warrants to increase the number of shares authorized to 80,000,000 of which 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock are authorized and 75,000,000purchase 71,500 shares of common stock are authorized.

Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the board to issue these shares in one or more series, to determine the designationswith a five-year term and the powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, including the dividend rights, conversion or exchange rights, voting rights (including the number of votes per share), redemption rights and terms, liquidation preferences, sinking fund provisions and the number of shares constituting the series. As of September 30, 2017, there was no issued preferred stock.
Common Stock
On January 13, 2017, the Company agreed to issue 79,167 shares of common stock to a consultant in full settlement for prior services rendered to the Company. Settlement occurred February 21, 2017 with the issuance of the shares, resulting in a gain on settlement of $0.15 million recorded in gain in settlement of liability on the Statement of Operations. The obligation of $0.24 million had been recorded by the Company in accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2016.
On February 14, 2017, the Company completed a public offering and sold 3,923,923 shares of the Company’s common stock. The offering price per unit was $1.35. The Company received net cash proceeds of $4.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and direct offering expenses payable by us. See Note 4 above regarding Warrant issuances related to our February public offering.

During September 2017, the Company sold 154,121 shares of common stock from $2.52 to $2.71 per share with net cash proceeds of $0.4 million.
Adoption of 2015 Stock Plan
On December 5, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Company’s 2015 Stock Plan, which was amended on April 22, 2016. The expiration date of the plan is December 5, 2025 and the total number of underlying shares of the Company’s common stock available for grant to employees, directors and consultants under the plan is 2,500,000 shares. The awards under the 2015 Stock Plan can be in the form of stock options, stock awards or stock unit awards. The following is a summary of option activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:  
  
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding, December 31, 2016 510,000
 $3.40
 $5.28
 9.29 $275,500
           
Granted 160,000
 $1.52
 $2.14
    
Outstanding, September 30, 2017 670,000
 $2.12
 $1.78
 8.85 $144,900
Exercisable, September 30, 2017 85,000
 $1.66
 $1.79
 7.15 $117,300
In January 2017, the Company granted members of its science advisory board options in the aggregate to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $2.31 per share, a term of 10$3.63 vesting quarterly over five years and a vesting period of 4 years. The exercise price was based upon the closing price of the stock on the day of the grant. The options have an aggregated fair value of $35,196 that was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.while services are being performed. In July and August 2017, the Company granted options to the Board and a management member to purchase 140,000 shares of the Company's common stock with exercise


prices of $1.87 and $2.88, respectively, with a term of 10 years and a vesting period of 4 years. The options have an aggregated fair value of $269,592 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Variables used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model include ranges of: (1) discount of 1.30%-2.24%, (2) expected lives of 5 to 6.25 years, (3) expected volatility of 70.18% to 89.11%, and (4) zero expected dividends. The Company, due to the limited number of participants in the plan and their positions within the Company, uses a 0% estimated forfeiture rate. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively in stock-based compensation in relation to the options. As of September 30, 2017, there was $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to the Company’s non-vested equity awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.34 years.

 The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the above paragraph. The expected term of the options was computed using the “plain vanilla” method as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin 107 because we do not have sufficient data regarding employee exercise behavior to estimate the expected term. The volatility was determined by referring to the average historical volatility of a peer group of public companies because we do not have sufficient trading history to determine our historical volatility. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

GSK Consulting Agreement

On July 29, 2017, 2021, the Company entered into a consultingportfolio development advisory agreement with GSK Strategies, LLC (“GSK”), for its investor relations operations. The consultinga related party entity and in connection with the agreement, covers for a period of twelve months from the date of July 29, 2017. In exchange for the consulting services, the Company agreed to issue twogranted equity-classified warrants (collectively, the “Warrants”) to purchase 100,000 and 50,000250,000 shares of common stock atwith a ten-year term and an exercise pricesprice of $2.41$3.08. The August 2021 warrants vest as follows: (a) 50% vests upon execution of the agreement, provided the advisor does not terminate the agreement prior to the end of the one-year term; and $3.00 per share, respectively,(b) 50% vests 60 days after the end of the one-year term, subject to approval by Nasdaqthe Company's Board of Directors determining that the services provided have been adequately performed. Also, both the April 2021 and August 2021 warrants vest in full if there is a listingchange of additional shares application, which was receivedcontrol event, as defined in August 2017.

Each of the Warrants vests over a 12-month period in equal monthly installments starting July 29, 2017, provided that GSK is providing Services toagreement.

At September 30, 2021, the Company pursuant tohad 396,502 equity classified warrants outstanding and 182,985 warrants were exercisable. At December 31, 2020, the consulting agreement on each vesting date. The Warrants became initially exercisable on August 8, 2017,Company had 109,639 equity classified warrants outstanding and expire five years from the initial exercise date. 85,472 warrants were exercisable.

The Company recorded stock compensation expense for the non-employee consulting agreementequity classified warrants of $63,000$422,000 and zero for the periodthree months ended September 30, 2017 based on2021 and 2020, respectively, and $432,000 and $5,000 during the fair value of the warrants vested as of nine months ended September 30, 2017.


2021 and 2020, respectively. At Market Issuance Sales Agreement
September 30, 2021, there was $632,000 of unrecognized stock compensation expense related to the Company's equity classified warrants.

 
On September 15, 2017,

5. Equity

2021 Stock Issuances

In June 2021, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”)(2021 ATM Agreement) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC and National Securities Corporation (collectively, the “Agents”).Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the 2021 ATM Agreement, the Company mayoffer and sell, from time to time through the AgentsOppenheimer shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $13.0 million (the “Shares”).

Any sales$50.0 million. As of Shares pursuantthe date of this report, there have been no issuances under the 2021 ATM Agreement.

In June 2021, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, will be made underLincoln Park agreed to purchase from the Company’s effective “shelf” registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-219434) which became effective on August 21, 2017 andCompany up to $20.0 million of common stock (subject to certain limitations) from time to time during the related prospectus supplement andterm of the accompanying prospectus, as filed withPurchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 15, 2017. Underterms of the Purchase Agreement, at the time the Company signed the Purchase Agreement, the Company may sell Shares throughissued 107,788 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as an Agent by any method that is deemed an “atinitial fee for its commitment to purchase shares of the market offering” as defined in Rule 415Company's common stock under the Securities ActPurchase Agreement, and has agreed to issue Lincoln Park up to an additional 53,893 shares of 1933,common stock as amended (the “Securities Act”).

Salescommitment shares pro-rata when and if Lincoln Park purchases (at our discretion) the $20.0 million aggregate commitment. The initial commitment shares issued in June 2021 were valued at $0.4 million, recorded as an addition to equity for the issuance of common stock and treated as a reduction to equity as a cost of capital to be raised under the Shares may be made at market prices prevailing at Purchase Agreement. There have been no additional shares issued to date under this agreement.

In February 2021, the time ofCompany entered into an underwritten public offering for the sale subject to such other terms as may be agreed upon at the time of sale, including a minimum sales price that may be stipulated by the Company’s BoardCompany of Directors or14,273,684 shares of its common stock at a duly authorized committee thereof.public offering price of $4.75 per share and granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,141,052 shares of common stock offered in the public offering, which was exercised. The Company orreceived total proceeds of $78.0 million, prior to deducting the Agents, under certain circumstancesunderwriting discount and upon notice to the other may suspend theestimated offering of the Shares under the Agreement. The offering of the Shares pursuant to the Agreement will terminate upon the sale of Shares in an aggregate offering amount equal to $13.0 million, or sooner if either expenses. In January 2021 the Company or the Agents terminate the Agreement pursuant to its terms.

The Company agreed to pay a commission to the Agents of 3.0% of theissued 468,684 shares for gross proceeds of $2.9 million using the saleCompany's 2020 At The Market Agreement (2020 ATM Agreement) with Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. The Company terminated the 2020 ATM Agreement on February 2, 2021. 

10

Stock-Based Compensation and Outstanding Awards

The 2015 Stock Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock awards, stock unit awards, and stock appreciation rights. As of September 30, 2021, there were 43,628 shares remaining to be issued under the 2015 Stock Plan. 

Stock-based compensation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands):

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 

General and administrative

 $443  $366  $1,085  $1,029 

Research and development

  534   94   732   236 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 $977  $460  $1,817  $1,265 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2021, the Company granted 532,865 stock options with a weighted average fair value of $3.24 per share at the date of grant and 150,000 shares of restricted stock units with a weighted average fair value of $3.73 per share at the date of grant. These stock options have a weighted average exercise price of $3.75 per share and vest over a one to three-year period from the grant date on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the Shares sold underaward as if the Agreement and to reimburse the Agents for certain expenses. The Company has also provided the Agents with customary indemnification rights. The Company is not obligated to make any sales of Common Stock under the Agreement.




As of September 30, 2017, the Company had sold 154,121 shares with gross proceeds of $0.4 million under this Agreement.
award was, in substance, multiple awards. These restricted stock units vest annually in four equal installments.

 

6. Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We do

The Company does not expect to pay any significant federal, state, or stateforeign income tax for 2017taxes in 2021 as a result of the losses recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172021 and the additional losses expected for the remainder of 20172021 and cumulative net operating loss carry forwards from prior years.carryforwards. Accounting standards require the consideration of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if it is “more likely than not” that some component or all of the benefits of deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result, as of September 30, 2017, we2021 and December 31, 2020 the Company maintained a full valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets.

The Company recorded no income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 2021 and 2016.2020, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 2021 and 2016 was2020 is 0%. The income tax rates vary from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to the change in fair value of the stock warrants and valuation allowances on the Company’s deferred tax assets. The Company estimates its annual effective tax rate at the end of each quarterly period. Jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year where no tax benefit can be recognized due to the valuation exclusionallowance could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a particular quarter depending on the mix and timing of actual earnings versus annual projections.

 

7. Commitments and Contingencies


WP1122 Portfolio

In addition to the commitments and contingencies described elsewhere in these notes, see below for a discussion of the Company's commitments and contingencies as of September 30, 2021.

Lease Obligations Payable

The rightsfollowing summarizes quantitative information about the Company's operating leases for the three and obligationsnine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively (in thousands):

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 

Lease cost:

                

Operating lease cost

 $29  $29  $87  $87 

Variable lease cost

  7   7   22   22 

Short-term lease cost

  0   4   0   13 

Total

 $36  $40  $109  $122 

The Company recorded approximately $10,000 and $31,000 in sublease income from a related party for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sublease income is recorded as other income, net on the Company's condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Operating cash flows from operating leases was$35,000 and $34,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $103,000 and $100,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. 

11

Licenses

MD Anderson - Total expenses related to an April 2012 Patent the Company's license agreements with MD Anderson were$56,000 and $61,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and Technology License Agreement2020, respectively, and$150,000 and $183,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

HPI - On March 16, 2020, the Company entered into by and between IntertechBio and MD Anderson (the “IntertechBio Agreement”) have been assigned to MBI. Therefore, MBI has obtained2 agreements with a royalty-bearing, worldwide, exclusive license to intellectual property, including patent rights, related to our WP1122 Portfolio and to our drug product candidate, WP1122. In consideration, MBI must make payments to MD Anderson including an up-front payment, license documentation fee, annual maintenance fee, milestone payments and minimum annual royalty payments for sales of products developed under the license agreement. Under the agreement, annual maintenance fees are $10,000 on the first anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, $20,000 on the second anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, $40,000 on the third anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, $60,000 on the fourth anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, $80,000 on the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the agreement and $100,000 on the sixth anniversary of the effective date of the agreement, except that such payments will no longer be due upon the first sale of a licensed product. Under the assignment, MBI agrees to make a minimum annual royalty payment in the amount of $200,000 for the first anniversary following the first sale of a licensed product, $400,000 for the second anniversary following the first sale of a licensed product, and $600,000 for the third year following the first sale of a licensed product.


One-time milestone payments are due as follows: 1) Upon commencement of a Phase II study for a licensed product - $200,000; 2) Upon commencement of a Phase III study for a licensed product - $250,000; 3) Upon filing of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for a licensed product - $400,000; and 4) Upon receipt of market approval for sale of a licensed product - $500,000. The rights we have obtained pursuant to the assignment of the IntertechBio Agreement are made subject to the rights of the U.S. government to the extent that the technology covered by the licensed intellectual property was developed under a funding agreement between MD Anderson and the U.S. government.

WP1066 Portfolio
The rights and obligations to a June 2010 Patent and Technology License Agreement entered into by and between Moleculin LLC and MD Anderson (the “Moleculin Agreement”) have been assigned to MBI. Therefore, MBI has obtained a royalty-bearing, worldwide, exclusive license to intellectual property rights, including patent rights, related to our WP1066 drug product candidate. In consideration, MBI must make payments to MD Anderson including an up-front payment, milestone payments and minimum annual royalty payments for sales of products developed under the license agreement. Annual Maintenance fee payments will no longer be due upon marketing approval in any country of a licensed product. One-time milestone payments are due upon commencement of the first Phase III study for a licensed product within the United States, Europe, China or Japan; upon submission of the first NDA for a licensed product in the United States; and upon receipt of the first marketing approval for sale of a licensed product in the United States. The rights we have obtained pursuant to the assignment of the Moleculin Agreement are made subject to the rights of the U.S. government to the extent that the technology covered by the licensed intellectual property was developed under a funding agreement between MD Anderson and the U.S.


government. The agreement, as amended, has the following the milestone payments: (i) commencement of Phase III Study for first licensed drug/product within the United States, Europe, China or Japan - $150,000; (ii) submission of the first NDA within the United States - $500,000; and (iii) receipt of first marketing approval for sale of a license product in the United States - $600,000.

MBI entered into an out-licensing agreement withparty, Houston Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“HPI”), pursuant(HPI). The first agreement, which has a term of two years, continues a prior consulting arrangement with HPI on the Company's licensed molecules and requires payments of $43,500 per quarter to HPI. The second agreement, which we have granted certain intellectual property rightscan be cancelled with sixty days' notice by either party, allows the Company's employees access to laboratory equipment owned by HPI including rights covering the potential drug candidate, WP1066 (“HPI Out-Licensing Agreement”). Under the HPI Out-Licensing Agreement we must make quarterly payments totaling $0.75 million for the first twelve quarters following the effective datea payment of May 2, 2016, of the HPI Out-Licensing Agreement in consideration for the right$15,000 per quarter to development dataHPI. Total expenses related to the development of licensed products. Notwithstanding our obligation to makeCompany's agreements with HPI were $59,000 for the foregoing payments,three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and$176,000and $226,000 for the HPI Out-Licensingnine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Sponsored Research Agreements with MD Anderson - MBI has a Sponsored Laboratory Study Agreement does not obligate HPI to conduct any research or to meet any milestones. Upon payment in the amount of $1.0 million to HPI within three years of the effective date of the HPI Out-Licensing Agreement we will regain all rights to the licensed subject matter and rights to any and all development data and any regulatory submissions including any IND, NDA or ANDA related to the licensed subject matter and can end the license without any other obligation other than the aforementioned quarterly payments.with MD Anderson expiring December 31, 2022. In the event that we do not exercise our right to regain our rights to the licensed subject matter within three years of the effective date of the HPI Out-Licensing Agreement, the license granted to HPI shall convert to an exclusive license upon HPI’s written notice and we shall be obligated to transfer all existing data relating to licensed subject matter including any development data and any IND to HPI.


On January 9, 2017, July 2021, the Company amended its Sponsored Laboratory Study Agreement with MD Anderson wherebyfor total payment of $175,000 to support the Company would pay $302,500 in 2017, which had been fully paid ascontinuation of July 31, 2017, and the project. The expenses recognized under this MD Anderson agreement was extended to October 31, 2018.

Annamycin
As of August 2015, we obtained the rights and obligations of Annamed under a June 2012 Patent and Technology Development and License Agreement by and between Annamed and Dermin (the “Annamed Agreement”). Therefore, certain intellectual property rights, including rights, if any, covering the potential drug product, Annamycin have been licensed to Dermin and Dermin has been granted a royalty-bearing, exclusive license to manufacture, have manufactured, use, import, offer to sell and/or sell products in the field of human therapeutics under the licensed intellectual property in the countries of Poland, Ukraine, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Netherlands, Turkey, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, Greece, Portugal, Norway, Denmark, Ireland, Finland, Luxembourg, Iceland, Kazakhstan, Russian Federation, Uzbekistan, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Germany (“Annamed licensed territories”). MBI is obligated to develop and provide a dossier containing data relatedwith regards to the licensed subject matter to Dermin. In consideration, Dermin will paySponsored Laboratory Study Agreements were $220,000 a royaltynd $212,000 for the sale of any licensed product in the Annamed licensed territories and pay all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by MBI in filing, prosecuting and maintaining the licensed patents for which the license has been granted. Dermin also agrees to provide a percentage of certain consideration that Dermin receives pursuant to sublicense agreements.

8. Subsequent Events

Subsequent to three months ended September 30, 2017 2021 and through2020, respectively, and$498,000 and $537,000 for the date of filing of these financial statements, approximately 25,000 additional Series A warrants related to our February 2017 public offering of common stock have been exercised, leaving approximately 420,000 Series A and Broker warrants outstanding. As a result of this exercise, the Company received approximately $0.04 million.

Additionally, under the At Market Issuance Sales Agreement mentioned in Note 5 and subsequent to nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company sold approximately 345,000 shares with gross proceeds2021 and 2020, respectively.

8. Subsequent Events

There were no additional subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2021 except those discussed elsewhere in these notes.

12


On October 3, 2017, the Board of Directors, after researching comparable companies and using a leading industry survey, approved the issuance of 10-year options, with 4-year vesting, to purchase 590,000 shares, in the aggregate, of the Company’s common stock, under the Company’s 2015 Stock Plan, to its executive officers and other employees. The options had an exercise price of $2.49 per share.

On October 31, 2017, the Company added Sandra Silberman, M.D., PH.D., as Chief Medical Officer - New Products. The Board of Directors approved the issuance of 10-year options, with 4-year vesting, to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, under the Company’s 2015 Stock Plan to Dr. Silberman. The options had an exercise price of $1.92 per share.



On November 1, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 10-year options, with 4-year vesting, to purchase 10,000 shares, each, of the Company’s common stock, under the Company’s 2015 Stock Plan to two potential new members of the Science Advisory Board, subject to the approval process of their respective institutions. The options had an exercise price of $1.95 per share.



 






ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q, including the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (“MD&A”) contains certain forward-looking statements. Historical results may not indicate future performance. Our forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events, are based on assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these statements.

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

Our ability to obtain additional funding to develop our product candidates;
The need to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates;
The success of our clinical trials through all phases of clinical development;
Our ability to complete our clinical trials in a timely fashion and within our expected budget;
Compliance with obligations under intellectual property licenses with third parties;
Any delays in regulatory review and approval of product candidates in clinical development;
Our ability to commercialize our product candidates;
Market acceptance of our product candidates;
Competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;
Potential product liability claims;
Our dependency on third-party manufacturers to supply or manufacture our product candidates;
Our ability to establish or maintain collaborations, licensing or other arrangements;
Our ability and third parties’ abilities to protect intellectual property rights;
Our ability to adequately support future growth; and
Our ability to attract and retain key personnel to manage our business effectively.

Our ability to continue our relationship with MD Anderson, including our ability to maintain current licenses and license future intellectual property resulting from our sponsored research agreements with MD Anderson;
The success or the lack thereof, including the ability to recruit patients of our clinical trials through all phases of clinical development;
Our ability to satisfy any requirements imposed by the FDA (or its foreign equivalents) as a condition of our clinical trials proceeding or beginning as planned;

The impact of COVID-19 on our clinical trials, clinical drug candidate supplies, preclinical activities and our ability to raise future financing;

Our ability to obtain additional funding to commence or continue our clinical trials, fund operations and develop our product candidates;

The need to obtain and retain regulatory approval of our drug candidates, both in the United States and in Europe, and in countries deemed necessary for future trials;

Our ability to complete our clinical trials in a timely fashion and within our expected budget and resources;

Compliance with obligations under intellectual property licenses with third parties;

Any delays in regulatory review and approval of drug candidates in clinical development;

Potential efficacy of our drug candidates;

Our ability to commercialize our drug candidates;

Market acceptance of our drug candidates;

Competition from existing therapies or new therapies that may emerge;

Potential product liability claims;

Our dependency on third-party manufacturers to successfully, and timely, supply or manufacture our drug candidates for our preclinical work and our clinical trials;

Our ability to establish or maintain collaborations, licensing or other arrangements;

The ability of our sublicense partners to successfully develop our product candidates in accordance with our sublicense agreements;

Our ability and third parties’ abilities to protect intellectual property rights;

Our ability to adequately support future growth; and

Our ability to attract and retain key personnel to manage our business effectively.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, including any changes that might result from any facts, events, or circumstances after the date hereof that may bear upon forward-looking statements. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements.

Highlights

Overview 

We are a clinical-stageclinical stage pharmaceutical development company organizedfocused on the treatment of highly resistant cancers and viruses. We have three core technologies, based substantially on discoveries made at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MD Anderson). These three core technologies are Annamycin, the WP1066 Portfolio, and the WP1122 Portfolio and include a total of five drug candidates, three of which have now shown human activity in clinical trials.

Three Core Technologies

We consider Annamycin to be a "next generation" anthracycline, unlike any currently approved anthracyclines, as it is designed to avoid multidrug resistance mechanisms with little to no cardiotoxicity (the efficacy of all currently approved anthracyclines is limited by both multidrug resistance and cardiotoxicity). WP1066 is one of several Immune/Transcription Modulators, designed to stimulate the immune response to tumors by inhibiting the errant activity of Regulatory T-Cells (TRegs) while also inhibiting key oncogenic transcription factors, including p-STAT3 (phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), c-Myc (a cellular signal transducer named after a homologous avian virus called Myelocytomatosis) and HIF-1α (hypoxia inducible factor 1α). These transcription factors are widely sought targets that are believed to contribute to an increase in cell survival and proliferation, and the angiogenesis (coopting vasculature for blood supply), invasion, metastasis and inflammation associated with tumors. They may also play a role in the inability of immune checkpoint inhibitors to affect more resistant tumors. WP1220 is a close analog to WP1066 that we have developed as a Delaware corporationpotential topical therapy for skin-related diseases.

Our third core technology is centered on new compounds designed to target the roles of glycolysis and glycosylation in July 2015 to focus on the development of anti-cancer drug candidates. We currently have four drug candidates representing three substantially different approaches to treating cancer. Liposomal Annamycin, which we refer to as Annamycin,both cancer and viral diseases. As an example, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) is a chemotherapy designed to destroyglucose decoy that is capable of inhibiting glycolysis, thereby cutting off the DNA of rapidly replicating tumor cells. WP1122 is an inhibitor of glycolysis intended to cut of theprimary fuel supply for both cancer cells and viral host cells by taking advantage of tumor cells, which are often overly dependenttheir high level of dependence on glycolysis as comparedglucose in comparison to healthy cells. And, finally, WP1066 and WP1220, have shown capability, in in vivo testing,In addition, 2-DG is capable of altering glycosylation, a process by which, when coopted by tumors, cancer cells are believed to evade the cell signalingbody’s immune response. In the case of viruses like SARS-CoV-2 (the virus responsible for COVID-19), glycosylation forms the glycoprotein spikes surrounding the coronavirus that give it its name and enable both evasion of the immune response and the ability to infect new host cells. One of the limitations of 2-DG, however, is how rapidly it is metabolized, resulting in a short circulation time and limited tissue/organ distribution characteristics. Our lead Metabolism/Glycosylation Inhibitor, WP1122, is a prodrug of 2-DG that appears to improve the drug-like properties of 2-DG by increasing its circulation time and improving tissue/organ distribution. Recent published research has identified that 2-DG has antiviral potential against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and, based on publicly available information, a recently completed Phase 2 clinical trial by an unrelated company in India has reported efficacy in COVID-19 patients, resulting in the Emergency Use Authorization of 2-DG by the Drugs Controller General of India. New research also points to the potential for 2-DG to be capable of enhancing the usefulness of checkpoint inhibitors. Considering that WP1122 generally outperforms 2-DG alone in both in vitro and in vivo tumor models and in viral in vitro models, we believe WP1122 has the potential to become an important drug to potentiate existing therapies, including checkpoint inhibitors. We are also engaged in preclinical development of additional antimetabolites (WP1096 and WP1097) targeting glycolysis and glycosylation.

Clinical Trials

During 2020, three of our drug candidates accounted for five clinical trials in the U.S. and Europe. Two of those trials are ongoing externally funded studies of WP1066 in brain tumors. Two of our internally funded Phase 1 clinical trials have concluded. The U.S. trial for Annamycin in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) successfully met its safety endpoint, and the trial for WP1220 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) demonstrated an objective response rate of 45% and a clinical benefit rate of 100%. An additional Phase 1/2 clinical trial of Annamycin in AML is also internally funded and is currently ongoing. In 2021, we have initiated two additional clinical trials and we anticipate the initiation of two or more new clinical trials in addition to the three trials continuing from 2020, as discussed further below. The brain tumor trial at MD Anderson will be terminated this year, as the original lead physician investigator moved to another institution, and we expect a new, similar externally funded trial to begin elsewhere in 2022.

Below we use certain terms to describe our clinical trials. By "internally funded” we mean that the primary costs of the preclinical activity and clinical trials are funded by us. “Externally funded” drug candidates include those for which preclinical work is funded and performed by external collaborators and/or for which clinical trials are physician sponsored. For externally funded research, any grant funds that support such preclinical work or clinical trials and most of the associated expenses are not reflected in our financial statements. However, the costs of drug product and other minor supporting activities that we provide for externally funded preclinical activities and clinical trials are included in our financial statements.

Recently reported data from our sponsored research demonstrates that in AML mouse models, the combination of Annamycin with tumors.


Ara-C (a chemotherapy drug commonly used in AML patients) has a synergistic effect, suggesting that this combination may be more beneficial for AML patients than Annamycin is an anthracycline being studiedas a single agent. Accordingly, and as one of the possible trials to be initiated mentioned above in 2021, we plan to begin a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of Annamycin in combination with Ara-C for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, or AML. In August 2015, the Company acquired the rightsAML in Europe, by seeking approval for our own internally funded clinical trial in Europe and prior development data regarding Annamycin and the prior Annamycin investigative new drug application (“IND”) with thepossibly a second, similar trial through our sublicensee, WPD Pharmaceuticals, in Poland. Furthermore, we received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), including all trade secrets, know-how, confidential information and other intellectual property rights. Annamycin had been(FDA) clearance in clinical trials pursuant to an IND filed with the FDA by a prior drug developer, which was terminated when that developer ceased activity for financial reasons. Our review of that prior clinical data leads us to believe that Annamycin may have greater potential for efficacy and safety in relapsed or refractory AML patients than currently available therapies.

Because the prior developer of Annamycin allowed their IND to lapse, we were required to submit a new IND for continued clinical trials with Annamycin, which the FDA allowedlate 2020 to proceed on September 22, 2017. The Company announced on October 3, 2017 that it had signed an agreement with a hospital in Poland to participate in this trial, which will be our first clinical site, assuming the receipt of regulatory approval in Poland. The data presented in our successful IND submission to FDA were submitted to Polish regulatory authorities on October 23, 2017 in support of our request for Clinical Trial Authorization (“CTA”) in that country. Depending on the timing of the CTA approval, we could begin treating patients in a Phase I/II1b/2 clinical trial as early as late December of 2017. The Phase I dose-ranging portion of this trial is designed to establish a new Recommended Phase 2 Dosage, or RP2D, which we believe was not adequately explored in previous trials.

The Annamycin drug substance is no longer covered by any existing patent protection. On July 18, 2017, the Company announced that it had signed a new technology license agreement with MD Anderson Cancer Center based on new patent applications that the Company intends to file relating to Annamycin. These patent applications are related to the formulation,


synthetic process and reconstitution related to our Annamycin drug product candidate, although there is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such patent protection.

On March 21, 2017, we received notice that the FDA had granted us Orphan Drug designation for Annamycin for the treatment of AML. Orphan Drug status could entitle us to market exclusivity of up to 7soft tissue sarcoma (STS) lung metastases and 10 years from the date of approval of a New Drug Application (“NDA”)we began this internally funded trial in the United States. If we obtain similar designationU.S. in the European Union (“EU”),second quarter of 2021. Additionally, we couldexpect in 2021 a second Phase 1b/2 clinical trial of Annamycin in sarcoma lung metastases to be entitledprimarily investigator-funded in Europe.

WP1066 is currently in two U.S. physician-sponsored Phase 1 trials, one at MD Anderson for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) in adults and another at Emory University for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors (including DIPG and medulloblastoma). The brain tumor trial at MD Anderson will be terminated this year and we expect a new, similar externally funded trial to 10 years of market exclusivity there from the date of approval ofbegin elsewhere in 2022. We began and completed a Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”),"proof-of-concept" Phase 1 clinical trial in 2020 in Poland for a third drug, WP1220 (a molecule in the United States and the European Union (“EU”), respectively. Separately, the FDA may also grant market exclusivity of up to 5 years with the approval of an active moiety (a “new chemical entity,” which we anticipate Annamycin would be), but there can be no assurance that such exclusivity will be granted.


Our other drug development projects relate to two distinct portfolios of small molecules, which we refer to as the WP1066 Portfolio, focused on the modulation of key oncogenic transcription factors involved in the progression of cancer, and the WP1122 Portfolio, a suite of molecules targeting the metabolic processes involved in cancer in general, and glioblastoma (the most common form of brain tumor) and pancreatic cancer in particular. We have been granted royalty-bearing, worldwide, exclusive licensesPortfolio), for the patent and technology rights related to our WP1066 Portfolio and WP1122 Portfolio drug technologies, as these patent rights are owned by MD Anderson.

During 2017, the Company announced the following progress on the WP1066 and WP1122 portfolios: 1) that it engaged a contract research organization (“CRO”) to prepare for a proof-of-concept trial in Poland to study the Company’s drug candidate WP1220 (part of the WP1066 portfolio described above) for thetopical treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma 2)(CTCL). We are actively seeking collaboration with a strategic partner in the Company entered into collaborative agreementsnear term for external funding for the continued development of WP1220 in a Phase 2 clinical trial as a topical therapy for CTCL, and based on the pace of current discussions, we do not anticipate this trial to begin this year. If we are not successful in this outreach, we may choose to use internal funds to generate additional human data to facilitate such outreach efforts.

Finally, we received authorization from regulatory authorities in the United Kingdom (U.K.) to commence a Phase 1a clinical trial of WP1122 in healthy volunteers with the Universityintent to progress to COVID-19 patients either there or in locations where the prevalence of BergenCOVID-19 will adequately support recruitment. We intend to internally fund the initial trials of WP1122 but may seek external funding opportunities. Additionally, we are planning to file an IND in Norwaythe U.S. for the treatment of certain cancers with WP1122.

In summary, we had five clinical trials underway or concluded in 2020 and we now expect up to six clinical trials to be underway or approved in 2021, including externally funded trials, with more expected to begin in 2022.

Update on Clinical Trials and Licensing

Annamycin

Annamycin is currently in one Phase 1/2 clinical trial in Europe, and the Phase 1 portion of another Phase 1/2 AML trial in the U.S. has been concluded, subject to final database closure, which should occur prior to the end of 2021.

The trial in Poland is in its fifth cohort, where patients are being treated at 240 mg/m2. Patient 2 in this cohort experienced certain elevated liver enzymes (AST and ALT), which under the original clinical trial protocol, were considered a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). In this instance, the DLT was secondarily related to concomitant medication not being withheld. Although that DLT resolved, in accordance with the trial protocol, the cohort was expanded and has now enrolled a total of five patients. In March 2021, patient 4 in this cohort experienced a similar DLT, which also resolved. Although treatment was discontinued for Patients 2 and 4, a total of three patients in this cohort received the full dose of Annamycin without any DLTs and, based on preliminary data, all three responded to treatment, with one relapsed patient experiencing a partial response, a refractory patient experiencing a partial response (PR) and another relapsed patient completely clearing circulating blasts. With this preliminary data, 67% of the patients receiving a full course of treatment at 240 mg/m2 experienced clinical benefit. It is also noteworthy that the patient with a PR was refractory to prior induction therapy and, as such, a response to single agent therapy is generally not expected.

Although the elevated liver enzymes described above meet the test WP1122of a “Dose Limiting Toxicity” per the original clinical trial protocol, our medical advisors have determined that these instances were transient and self-limited with no evidence of serious sequalae (related longer-term negative effects) and, therefore, should not be considered DLTs in future patients unless these elevated enzyme levels do not return to near baseline (baseline or less than or equal to grade 1) within a reasonable time or if there is other evidence of serious sequalae. Based on this new data, we amended the protocol for this trial in Poland to change the DLT criteria as it relates to transient grade 3 elevations of liver enzymes to allow us to dose three additional patients in the 240 mg/m2 cohort. This amendment was approved and granted allowance by regulatory authorities in Poland in July 2021. If no DLT is experienced with these next three patients, we will escalate dosing in new cohorts by 30 mg/m2 instead of the 60 mg/m2 previously planned, and with a de-escalation of 15 mg/m2 at the DLT dose if future patients experience a DLT. As of the end of October, one of the three patients needed to complete the cohort was admitted to the trial and began dosing.

Additionally, our sublicense partner, WPD Pharmaceuticals Sp.z o.o. (WPD), recently announced that it was conditionally awarded a reimbursement grant of approximately $6.7 million (20.4 million PLN) from the Polish National Center for Research and Development (NCRD), for the development of Annamycin. The funds may be used for the continued development of Annamycin, including a possible clinical trial of Annamycin in combination with another drugAra-C for which this grant is expected to cover the reimbursement of about 60% of planned costs. WPD is a sub-licensee of certain technologies from us in 29 countries in Europe and Asia. We plan to commence a similar trial combining Annamycin with Ara-C for the treatment of brain tumorsAML prior to the end of 2021 and separatelypossibly prior to this grant funded trial starting. The grant-funded trial should begin in the near term and since this is an externally funded trial subject to ongoing granting authority oversight, we cannot provide any assurance as to when or if it will commence.

Regarding our ongoing U.S. clinical trial of Annamycin for the treatment of STS lung metastases, we currently have three sites open and active in the study and expect a total of five sites to be active by the first quarter of 2022. In the second quarter of 2021 this trial began enrolling and dosing patients. The three sites open are as follows: 1) Sarcoma Oncology Research Center in Santa Monica, CA; 2) Rutgers, The State University in New Brunswick, NJ; and 3) Washington University in St. Louis, MO.

On August 12, 2021, we announced that patients were treated in the first cohort at a dose level of 210 mg/m2 with no drug-related adverse events constituting a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during the 21-day DLT evaluation period, including no signs of cardiotoxicity. The results for all three patients were reviewed in the Cohort Review Meeting, which determined that the trial could progress to the next higher dose level of 270 mg/m2.

On October 18, 2021, we announced that the second cohort had concluded safely and that the next cohort at the next higher dose level of 330 mg/m2 would open. Additionally, we reported that four of the five patients that have completed scans to date (from cohort one and two) demonstrated a response to treatment, including three with extended and, in one case, continuing stable disease and one patient with a substantial (>30%) reduction in tumor size, constituting a PR under the protocol. The third cohort was opened the following week and one patient has enrolled and started treatment. Two other patients have been identified. Further updates on patients will be announced at the end of the third cohort.

Earlier in 2021, we announced that the Agencja Badań Medycznych (The Medical Research Agency) a Polish state agency responsible for development of scientific research in the field of medical and health sciences, awarded a grant equivalent to $1.5 million to the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute to fund a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial of Annamycin for the treatment of STS lung metastases. The grant-funded clinical trial will be led by Prof. Piotr Rutkowski, MD, PhD, Head of Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland. Prof. Piotr Rutkowski will be assisted, in part, by WPD who will provide support in preparation for and conduct of the clinical trial, which is expected to begin before the end of the first quarter of 2022. As this is a grant funded trial, we have limited input and control over timing. As a part of the collaboration between Moleculin and Prof. Rutkowski, Moleculin will be supplying the drug product and other ancillary services necessary for the clinical trial, but Moleculin will not participate in conducting the clinical trial. This trial is independent from and will be in addition to the U.S. clinical trial Moleculin is planning to conduct further analysis onwith Annamycin in STS lung metastases. As an important point of differentiation, the capabilityclinical protocol for the Polish trial provides for a different dosing regimen than the U.S. trial.

WP1066

The clinical trial of WP1066 to stimulate anti-tumor immune response, 3) the Company entered into an agreement with the Mayo Clinic to study WP1066 for the treatment of rareadult brain tumors at MD Anderson has completed the fourth cohort at 8mg/kg in the dose escalation phase. In the first quarter of 2021, we were notified that the physician sponsoring this trial would be leaving MD Anderson. As a result, and as expected, MD Anderson has notified us that they will be closing this trial. Several additional institutions have expressed an interest in sponsoring similar research on WP1066 in brain tumors, so to help ensure the potential continuation of this important research, regardless of the sponsoring institution, we have requested the right to reference the MD Anderson IND, as provided for under our Clinical Trial Agreement with MD Anderson, in our own IND. We are working to continue this research in additional physician-sponsored trials in 2022.

One patient has been treated in the third cohort of the Phase 1 dose escalation portion of physician-sponsored clinical trial at Emory University for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors with WP1066 at the dose level of 8mg/kg. Two more patients will be treated at this dose level. Emory University has amended its protocol to allow dosing at 16 mg/kg after these two additional patients have been dosed, and 4) the Company agreedthird cohort dosing has been deemed safe.

WP1122

Based on previously announced data demonstrating the antiviral potential of our lead antimetabolite molecule, WP1122, we intend to assist MD Andersontest the drug candidate for the potential treatment of COVID-19. Although we have previously disclosed that antiviral clinical trials in submittingthe U.S. will be dependent upon demonstrating efficacy in an appropriate COVID-19 animal model, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom (U.K.) is not making such animal data a requirement for a clinical trial application (CTA) for a Phase 1a clinical trial beginning with healthy volunteers in that country. Based on their feedback, in August 2021 we submitted a CTA for a Phase 1a clinical trial of WP1122 for the treatment of COVID-19 in the U.K. On October 19, 2021, we announced that we received authorization from regulatory authorities in the U.K. to commence a Phase 1a clinical trial of WP1122 in healthy volunteers with the intent to progress to COVID-19 patients either there or in locations where the prevalence of COVID-19 will adequately support recruitment. We intend to internally fund the initial trials of WP1122 but may seek external funding opportunities.

The preclinical work to evaluate molecules within the WP1122 portfolio of antimetabolites (which include molecules capable of inhibiting glycolysis and altering glycosylation) for viral indications is mostly similar to the preclinical work we originally planned as part of developing WP1122 for cancer indications. Accordingly, we believe the preclinical work we have completed for WP1122 will also support an IND application or its equivalent in other countries for cancer-related clinical trials. We continue to plan to submit such an IND in the U.S. in 2021.

COVID-19 and Worldwide Supply Chain Issues 

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of a novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic, which continues to spread throughout the world. The spread of COVID-19 has caused significant volatility in U.S. and international markets, including Poland, where we conduct some of our clinical trials and Italy, where our Annamycin drug supply is produced. There has been limited interruption of our drug supply, and most Polish clinics where we are conducting trials are limiting access for monitoring activities. Additionally, we believe COVID-19 materially slowed the recruitment of patients for our clinical trials, but we are now beginning to see an increase in recruitment. This could worsen or be alleviated at any time. Furthermore, there is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as its impact on the U.S. and international economies and, as such, we are unable to determine if it will have a material impact to our operations. Additionally, we believe that the potential for impact to our supply chain due to COVID-19 will be reduced as vaccine production normalizes throughout the industry. In the third quarter, worldwide supply chain issues began delaying certain shipments. The supply chain for the studymanufacturing of WP1066 in glioblastomaour drug candidates and melanoma that has metastasizedsupplies for clinical trials can be complicated and involves several parties. If we were to the brain, which MD Anderson filed on November 1, 2017.








Overview
MBI was founded in 2015 in order to combine and consolidate the development efforts involving several anti-cancer technologies, some of which are based on license agreements with MD Anderson. This effort began with the acquisition of the Annamycin development project from AnnaMed, Inc., or AnnaMed, followed by the acquisition of the license rights to the WP1122 Portfolio from IntertechBio Corporation, or IntertechBio. Further, on behalf of Moleculin, LLC, we entered into a co-development agreement with Houston Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or HPI, which culminated with the merger of Moleculin, LLC into MBI coincident with our initial public offering allowing us to gain control of the WP1066 Portfolio.

Moleculin, LLC was formed in 2006 and was working to develop the WP1066 Portfolio it licensed from MD Anderson. On May 2, 2016, Moleculin, LLC was merged with and into MBI. Asexperience any supply chain issues, including as a result of the merger, we issued the holdersCOVID-19 pandemic our product supply could be disrupted. We believe that our operations have not been materially impacted to date. In view of Moleculin, LLC equity interestscurrent worldwide trends with respect to COVID-19 and convertible notes an aggregate of approximately 999,931 shares of our common stock. Since Moleculin, LLC commenced operations in 2006, substantially all of its efforts had been focused on research, development and the advancement of the WP1066 Portfolio. Moleculin, LLC did not generate any revenue from product sales and, as a result, incurred significant losses.

We do not have manufacturing facilities and all manufacturing activities are contracted out to third parties. Additionally,worldwide supply chain issues, we do not expect either issue to materially further impact recruitment for or the operation of current or future clinical trials. However, we cannot be certain that these trends will continue and there is the possibility they may reverse. 

We receive requests for compassionate use (or its foreign equivalent) of our drug candidates in the ordinary course of business. WP1066 and Annamycin have both been involved with such requests. As we have very limited involvement in the treatment of such patients, we do not ordinarily report the details on such uses.

Licensing

We are currently in discussions with MD Anderson regarding amendments to existing licenses and new licenses related to Annamycin and WP1122 and expect to execute the related amendments and new licenses by the end of 2021. In the second quarter, we amended the WP1122 license to allow for an additional six-month extension to file a sales organization.

Portfolio Status
U.S. IND for the application of WP1122 until February 2022 on the condition that we file a similar application in another country. On August 3, 2021, we filed a CTA for the application of WP1122 in the United Kingdom, which filing satisfied one of the requirements under the license agreement. In addition, we intend to file a U.S. IND for the application of WP1122 before the end of 2021, which will satisfy the remaining IND filing requirement. We retain the right to further extend these dates within the amended agreement.

Recent Business Developments

Below are important milestonesrecent business developments.

Annamycin

Interim Data in Phase 1b/2 Clinical Trial of Annamycin for each drug/portfoliothe Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Lung Metastases

On October 18, 2021, we announced the Company.


Annamycin

Received Orphan Drug Status for Annamycin - On March 21, 2017, we received noticeinterim and preliminary data from the FDA that we had obtained Orphan Drug designation forfirst two cohorts evaluating Annamycin for the treatment of AML effective March 20, 2017.

Possible Improvementsoft tissue sarcoma lung metastases. The data demonstrated 80% clinical activity, defined as stable disease or better. We have noted that no DLT’s have been experienced to-date, including cardiotoxicity. Patient enrollment in the Recommendedthird cohort began subsequently. 

Approval to Extend Dose Escalation in Phase II Dose (“RP2D”) in Upcoming Phase I/IIa1/2 European Clinical Trial - In reviewing prior data, Evaluating Annamycin for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

On July 13, 2021, we determinedannounced that we had received approval from the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Karol Marcinkiewicz in Poznań (Ethics Committee) as well as an allowance from the Polish Department of Registration of Medicinal Products (URPL) for a protocol amendment for our Phase 1/2 evaluating Annamycin for the treatment of subjects with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is refractory to or relapsed after induction therapy.

First Subject Enrolled and Dosed in Phase 1b/2 Clinical Trial of Annamycin for the Treatment of Sarcoma Lung Metastases

On June 21, 2021, we announced that we commenced enrollment and dosed the first subject in our U.S. Phase 1b/2 clinical trial evaluating Annamycin for the treatment of STS lung metastases.

Receives Clearance to Commence Phase 1b/2 Clinical Trial of Annamycin for the Treatment of Sarcoma Lung Metastases

On May 25, 2021, we announced that we received clearance to initiate our Phase 1b/2 clinical trial evaluating Annamycin for the treatment of STS lung metastases. We announced that the prior developer may not have adequately explored the optimum dosing levelfirst of several planned clinical sites was open and we expected to begin patient enrollment.

FDA Approval of Fast Track Designation for Annamycin in AML patients. Accordingly, we planned our clinical trial to begin with a Phase I to establish the RP2D with a follow-on Phase IIa. We believe this change in strategy will add several months to the timeline for eventual final approvalTreatment of the drug, however, we believe that this extension of time to complete the trial will not prevent us from publicly announcing some, if not all, of the results from our Phase I/II clinical trial sometime in 2018.


Received allowance for our IND for Annamycin - Sarcoma Lung Metastases

On September 26, 2017,March 30, 2021, we announced that the FDA had allowed the Annamycin IND to go into effect, which allows the Company to move forward with its plans for its Phase I/IIa trial for Annamycin in the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML, both here in the United States and, assuming the receipt of certain additional approvals, in Poland. We anticipate that the IRB (“Institutional Review Board”) approvals and site initiations of various clinical sites participating inapproved our Phase I/II clinical trial of Annamycin should begin occurring later in the fourth quarter of 2017.


The Company announced its first hospital contract for its Polish Annamycin Clinical Trial - On October 3, 2017, the Company announced that it had signed an agreement with its first hospital in Poland to participate in this trial, subject to Polish regulatory approval to proceed with a clinical trial.

The Company filed its request for Clinical Trial Authorization (“CTA”) in Poland - On October 23, 2017, the Company filed its CTA in Poland which, if granted, will enable a clinical trial to study AnnamycinFast Track Designation for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML in Poland. The CTA process in Poland normally takes 60 days. In Poland, a hospital contract is required prior to filing a CTA.

Relationship with Dermin - The Company has established relations with a company in a Poland - Dermin Sp. z o. o. (“Dermin”). The Company intends to utilize Dermin’s supply of active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) for Annamycin in the upcoming clinical Phase I/II clinical trial. Annamycin was previously licensed to Dermin within a limited region in Europe, enabling Dermin to deploy Polish grant funds toward producing Annamycin. We believe Dermin benefits from a data sharing arrangement giving it access to our clinical data necessary for the allowance of the Company's IND will require


the Company to manufacture, at an estimated cost of $0.2 million, additional drug product using the Dermin API in early 2018.

WP1066

Physician-Sponsored IND - A clinician at MD Anderson has advised us that MD Anderson has submitted to the FDA an IND for a physician-sponsored clinical trial involving WP1066 for the treatment of brain tumors. We are participating in a support role, but have no influence on the design or conduct of the clinical trial, or on the IND process. The clinician indicated that the IND was on hold pending further documentation that the WP1066 to be used in the trial was manufactured in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practice or GMP production of WP1066. The Company, on July 25, 2017, announced its intention to provide support to help the clinician address the issue. MD Anderson re-submitted its IND to the FDA on November 1, 2017, with our assistance. We are hopeful that FDA will permit this IND to go into effect in time to allow the trial to begin in 2017, subject to allowance by the FDA, and will produce useful clinical data in 2018. However, we are not in a position to influence the IND process and we can provide no assurance that such time frame will be achieved.

Preparing for a study for the treatment of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma - The Company announced in September 2017 that it engaged a CRO to prepare for a proof-of-concept trial in Poland to study the Company's drug candidate WP1220 (part of the WP1066 portfolio described above) for the treatment of a form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.


WP1122

Advancement of Preclinical Testing for Brain Tumors with WP1122 - WP1122 is our unique inhibitor of glucose metabolism, which is thought to be an important driver of glycolytic brain tumor progression and survival. A similar chemical structure to that which turns morphine into heroine has been used to allow WP1122 to successfully cross the blood-brain barrier and increase circulation time as compared to conventional inhibitors of glycolysis. On October 25, 2016, we announced promising initial results of the preclinical toxicology work on WP1122. We believe moving forward with full preclinical toxicology testing is key to our ability to generate a proof of concept in humans. We had previously announced the presentation of preclinical data in July 2016, supporting the potential for using WP1122 as a treatment for glioblastoma.

Collaborative Agreement - The Company entered into a collaborative agreement in September 2017 with the University of Bergen in Norway to test WP 1122 in combination with another drug in the treatment of brain tumors.

Recent Business Developments

Commitment to Supply WP1066 for a potentially grant funded study at the Mayo Clinic - Physician-scientists at the Mayo Clinic have requested and Moleculin has agreed to supply them with WP1066 for testing in a potential grant-funded clinical trial for children with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas (DIPG), a rare and very aggressive form of brain tumor. Animal studies conducted at this center have suggested that DIPG may be particularly sensitive to the inhibition of the activated form of a cell-signaling protein called STAT3, a primary target of WP1066, and their studies have demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity of WP1066 in DIPG in vitro and in vivo tumor models.

Announced the Discovery of a Metabolic Inhibitor with the Potential to Treat Pancreatic Cancer - The Company announced on June 21, 2017, that it has received attention from the scientific community for its glucose decoy technology (WP1122 Portfolio, Moleculin Presents Preclinical Data of Novel Inhibitor of Glycolysis at 28th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, December 13, 2016) as a potential means to starve tumors to death by exploiting their hyper-dependence on glycolysis for energy production. The Company has identified possible new properties of its compound WP1234, a modification to WP1122. In pre-clinical testing, WP1234 has shown improved drug characteristics when compared with WP1122 and a 20 to 50-fold greater ability to kill pancreatic cancer cell lines when compared with traditional inhibitors of glycolysis. The Company believes this discovery now makes WP1234 a promising drug candidate to be studied for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Moleculin Begins Clinical Testing Site Development Efforts in Poland - On August 3, 2017, the Company announced it appointed Bioscience SA (“Bioscience”), a Polish contract research organization (“CRO”) to begin identifying and preparing clinical testing sites in Poland for its drug, Annamycin, for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML. Furthermore, on October 18, 2017,soft tissue sarcoma. 

WP1066

Awarded New Rare Pediatric Disease Designation from U.S. FDA for WP1066 for the CompanyTreatment of Ependymoma

On April 14, 2021, we announced that 14 qualified cancer clinics (including sitesthe FDA had granted Rare Pediatric Disease Designation (RPD) to our p-STAT3 inhibitor, WP1066, for the treatment of ependymoma, one of the four unique indications for which WP1066 now has RPD status.

WP1122

Receives Authorization from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to Commence Phase 1a Clinical Trial of WP1122 for the Treatment of COVID-19

On October 19, 2021, we announced that we received authorization from the MHRA to commence a Phase 1a clinical trial of WP1122 in boththe United Kingdom. We also announced we received a favorable opinion from the London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee in the U.K. to begin the study, which is expected to be conducted at the Medicines Evaluation Unit in Manchester, United Kingdom.

IQVIA to Manage Potential COVID-19 Clinical Trial

On April 6, 2021, we announced the engagement of IQVIA Biotech, a contract research organization (CRO) to manage our efforts to begin potential clinical trials of WP1122 for the treatment of COVID-19.

Corporate

Inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index

On June 15, 2021, we announced that as part of the annual reconstitution of the Russell stock indexes, we were selected to be added to the Russell 2000 Index effective after the close of the U.S. and Poland) have requested to participate in its clinical trial.equity markets on June 25, 2021.

16




At Market Issuance Sales Agreement - On September 15, 2017, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC and National Securities Corporation (collectively, the “Agents”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company may sell from time to time through the Agents shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $13.0 million. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had sold 154,121 shares with gross proceeds of $0.4 million under this Agreement and, additionally, subsequent to September 30, 2017, the Company sold approximately 337,000 shares with gross proceeds of $0.8 million, bringing the total raised from the Agreement to $1.2 million in gross proceeds.

Announced Dr. Sandra Silberman as Chief Medical Officer: New Products - On October 31st, the Company added Sandra Silberman, M.D., PH.D., as Chief Medical Officer - New Products. The Compensation Committee approved the issuance of 10-year options, with 4-year vesting, to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, under the Company’s 2015 Stock Plan to Dr. Silberman. The options had an exercise price of $1.92 per share. Dr. Silberman's role will be in addition to that of Dr. Robert Shepard, Moleculin's Chief Medical Officer - Annamycin. Dr. Silberman’s career in clinical development began at Pfizer, Inc., where she oversaw the initiation of Tarceva (TM) clinical trials. She then led the global development of Gleevec® at Novartis. Sandra was the first Vice President and Global Therapeutic Area Head in Oncology at Eisai, a role in which she advanced five original compounds into Phases I through III, gaining the first approval for Eisai’s proprietary drug, Halavan®. Subsequently, she served as a senior advisor to a number of biopharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Imclone, Roche, and numerous biotech companies as an independent industry consultant.  She joined Quintiles in 2009as the Vice President of Oncology and Global Head of Translational Medicine in the newly formed Innovation division, overseeing drug development and novel technologies for new partnerships with the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Sandra earned her B.A., Sc.M. and Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University School of Arts and Sciences, School of Public Health and School of Medicine, respectively.  Her major focus of investigation and doctoral thesis was in the burgeoning area of tumor immunology.  She received her M.D. from Cornell University Medical College, completing a postdoctoral training and her fellowship in hematology/oncology at the Brigham & Women's and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.  She continued to do research in tumor immunology with a clinical investigator award from the NIH and became an Instructor in Medicine at Harvard Medical School.  She then served as an attending physician at Yale University Hospital. Sandra has continued in clinical practice throughout her career in industry, and is currently an attending physician in the Hematology/Oncology clinic at the Duke VA in Durham, NC.










Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, data derived from our statement of operations:

In thousands 
operations (in thousands) and such changes in the periods are discussed below in approximate amounts:

Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Revenues$
 $
 $
 $
        
Operating Expenses: 
  
  
  
Research and development1,061
 497
 2,260
 616
General and administrative1,338
 924
 2,987
 1,848
Depreciation5
 1
 13
 2
Total operating expenses2,404
 1,422
 5,260
 2,466
        
Loss from operations(2,404) (1,422) (5,260) (2,466)
        
Other income (expense): 
  
  
  
Loss from change in fair value of warrant liability(470) 
 (2,753) 
Gain from settlement of liability
 
 149
 
Gain from expiration of warrants
 
 1,238
 
Other income9
 
 8
 
Interest expense(1) (10) (2) (37)
        
Net loss$(2,866) $(1,432) $(6,620) $(2,503)

  

Three Months Ended September 30,

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 

Revenues

 $  $  $  $ 
                 

Operating expenses:

                

Research and development

  4,095   4,435   11,239   10,971 

General and administrative

  2,021   1,659   6,394   5,122 

Depreciation and amortization

  41   57   130   154 

Total operating expenses

  6,157   6,151   17,763   16,247 

Loss from operations

  (6,157)  (6,151)  (17,763)  (16,247)

Other income:

                

Gain from change in fair value of warrant liability

  1,678   2,743   4,428   1,489 

Other income, net

  13   10   30   32 

Interest income, net

  87   3   236   10 

Net loss

 $(4,379) $(3,395) $(13,069) $(14,716)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 compared2021 Compared to three months endedThree Months Ended September 30, 2016

2020

Research and Development Expense. Research and development (R&D) expense was $1.1$4.1 million and $0.5$4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The increasedecrease of approximately $0.6$0.3 million is mainly represents an increase of approximately: $0.1 million related to an increase the timing of costs incurred in R&D associated headcount costs: $0.1 million for sponsored research and related expenses; and, approximately $0.4 million associated with developing and testing2020 of producing additional drug product as we prepared our IND for Annamycin and for the related clinical trials.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $1.3$2.0 million and $0.9$1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The expense increase of approximately $0.4$0.3 million wasis mainly attributablerelated to the an increase in headcount and associated payroll costs of $0.2 million; $0.3 million of stock based compensation; and, approximately $0.1 million in legal, accounting, consulting and other professional expenses. This was offset by a reductionadvisory fees and an increase in public listing expenses of $0.2 million.


Lossour corporate insurance.

Gain from Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability. The Company We recorded a net loss of $0.5gain of $1.7 million in the third quarter of 20172021 as compared to a net gain of $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2020, for the change in fair value on revaluation of itsour warrant liability associated with itour warrants issued in conjunction with itsour stock offering in February 2017. The Company isofferings. We are required to revalue certain of its 2017our liability-classified warrants at the time of each warrant exercise, if applicable, and at the end of each reporting period and reflect in the statement of operations a gain or loss from the change in fair value of the warrant in the period in which the change occurred. We calculatecalculated the fair value of the warrants outstanding using the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo Simulation models.model. A gain results principally from a decline in the Company’sour share price during the period and a loss results principally from an increase in the Company’sour share price.



Net Loss. The net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $2.9 million which included non-cash income of $0.5 million related to a gain recognized on the expiration of warrants. The net loss also included additional noncash charges for $0.5 million for stock based compensation and other stock based expenses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 compared2021 Compared to nine months endedNine Months Ended September 30, 2016

2020

Research and Development Expense. R&D Research and development (R&D) expense was $2.3$11.2 million and $0.6$11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The increase of approximately $1.7 of $0.2 million is mainly represents an increase of approximately: $0.3 millionrelated to increased clinical trial activity as described above, and costs related to an increase in R&D headcount and associated payroll costs: $0.3 million for sponsored research and related expenses; approximately $0.2 million associated with developing and testingmanufacturing of additional drug product as we prepare for clinical trials: $0.4 million in clinical trial preparation and $0.5 million related to travel, legal, consultants, and other research costs associated in preparing our IND and Orphan Drug applications with the FDA.

product.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $3.0$6.4 million and $1.8$5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The expense increase of approximately $1.2 $1.3 million wasis mainly attributablerelated to thean increase in headcount and associated payroll costs of $0.5 million; $0.5 million of stock based compensation; approximately $0.3 million in legal, accounting, consulting and other professional expenses; approximately $0.1 millionadvisory fees and an increase in insurance expense; and $0.1 million in travel expenses. These costs were offset by a reduction in public listing expenses of $0.3 million.

Lossour corporate insurance.

Gain from Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability. The Company We recorded a net loss of $2.8gain of $4.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017third quarter of 2021 as compared to a net gain of $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2020, for the change in fair value on revaluation of itsour warrant liability associated with itsour warrants issued in conjunction with itsour stock offering in February 2017. The Company isofferings. We are required to revalue certain of its 2017our liability-classified warrants at the time of each warrant exercise, if applicable, and at the end of each reporting period and reflect in the statement of operations a gain or loss from the change in fair value of the warrant in the period in which the change occurred. We calculatecalculated the fair value of the warrants outstanding using the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo Simulation models.model. A gain results principally from a decline in the Company’sour share price during the period and a loss results principally from an increase in the Company’sour share price.

17

Gain from settlement
Gain from Expiration of Warrants. The Company recorded a gain during the second quarter of $1.2 million related to the expiration of warrants issued as part of the February 2017 stock offering.
Interest expense. Interest expense included expense accrued on our convertible promissory notes issued in 2015 and 2016 bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum. These convertible promissory notes were all converted into common stock during the second quarter of 2017. 

Net Loss. The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $6.6 million which included non-cash expenses of approximately $3.3 million which included $2.8 million for change in fair value of warrants liability and $0.5 million for stock based compensation and depreciation.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2017, we had $8.7 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $5.0 million at December 31, 2016. In February 2017, we completed a public offering of our common stock and warrants, pursuant to which we received approximately $4.5 million in net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. Additionally, through September 30, 2017, $3.3 million in cash was received from the exercise of warrants issued in our February public offering and $0.4 million from the sale of common stock in our ATM offering. Cash used in operations was $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This increase over prior year of $2.3 million was mainly due to headcount and general company activity increases, as the Company prepared its IND for Annamycin and readies for the related, upcoming clinical trials during 2017. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2017 and cash generated already in the fourth quarter will be sufficient to fund our planned operations into the third quarter of 2018. Such plans are subject to change depending on clinical enrollment progress and use of drug product.
We will not generate revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete development of, obtain regulatory approval for and begin to commercialize one or more of our product candidates, which we expect will take a number of years and is subject to significant uncertainty. Accordingly, we anticipate that we will need to raise additional capital to fund our future operations. Until such time that we can generate substantial revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operating activities through a combination of equity offerings and debt financings and we may seek to raise additional capital through strategic collaborations. However, we may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such arrangements when needed on favorable terms, or at all, which would have a negative impact on our financial condition and could force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our development programs or commercialization efforts or grant to others rights to develop or market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves. Failure to receive additional funding could cause us to cease operations, in part or in full. Furthermore, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations, which may cause dilution to our existing stockholders.

The following table sets forth our primary sources and uses of cash for the period indicated:

  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
Net cash used in operating activities $(4,934) $(2,596)
Net cash used in investing activities (12) (110)
Net cash provided by financing activities 8,675
 8,862
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $3,729
 $6,156
indicated (in thousands): 

  

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 
  

2021

  

2020

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 $(14,693) $(14,647)

Net cash used in investing activities

     (360)

Net cash provided by financing activities

  74,724   17,065 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (26)  2 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 $60,005  $2,060 

As of September 30, 2021, there was $0.3 million of cash on hand in a bank account in Australia and we know of no related limitations impacting our liquidity in Australia.

Cash used in operating activities

Net cash

Cash used in operating activitiesoperations was $4.9$14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $2.62021. This $0.1 million increase over the prior year period of $14.6 million was primarily due to payments for the same period in 2016. Thisincreased consulting and advisory fees as well as an increase in useour corporate insurance. These are all a reflection of cashthe ongoing clinical and pre-clinical activity and the associated increase in general and administrative support for operations is due to our becoming operational post IPO in mid-2016. This mainly included payments made for R&D and services related to our becoming a publicly traded company and related filing fees, along with payments made to MD Anderson for license and maintenance fees.

Cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was basically nil for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $0.1 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
three core drug technologies.

Cash provided in financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $8.7

In June 2021, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (2021 ATM Agreement) with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the 2021 ATM Agreement, we may offer and sell, from time to time through Oppenheimer shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $50.0 million. As of the date of this report, there have been no issuances under the 2021 ATM Agreement.

In June 2021, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund (Lincoln Park Agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Lincoln Park agreed to purchase from us up to $20.0 million of common stock (subject to certain limitations) from time to time during the term of the Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, at the time we signed the Purchase Agreement, we issued 107,788 shares of common stock to Lincoln Park as an initial fee for its commitment to purchase shares of our common stock under the nine months ended September 30, 2017 comparedPurchase Agreement, and have agreed to $8.9issue Lincoln Park up to an additional 53,893 shares of common stock as commitment shares pro-rata when and if Lincoln Park purchases (at our discretion) the $20.0 million foraggregate commitment.

To date, we have not used the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The activity in 20162021 ATM Agreement nor the Lincoln Park Agreement to raise additional capital beyond what is related to our initialdescribed above.

In February 2021, we completed an underwritten public offering stock issuance which raised a net $8.5 million, issuanceof an aggregate of 14,273,684 shares of common stock at $3a public offering price of $4.75 per share which raised $0.7 million, and issuance of convertible notes which raised $0.2 million. The activity in 2017 is relatedshare. We granted the underwriters a 30-day option to the Company’s follow-on public offeringpurchase up to an additional 2,141,052 shares of common stock offered in the public offering. The offering closed on February 5, 2021 and warrants. Of this latter amount, $3.8gross proceeds of the offering were approximately $67.8 million, is relatedprior to deducting the underwriting discount and other offering expenses. On February 10, 2021, the underwriters of the public offering exercised in full their option to purchase an additional 2,141,052 shares of common stock at the public offering price of $4.75 per share, bringing total gross proceeds to approximately $78.0 million before underwriting discount.

In January 2021 we issued 468,684 shares for gross proceeds of $2.9 million using our 2020 ATM Agreement with Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. We terminated the 2020 ATM Agreement on February 2, 2021. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2021, 10,000 shares were issued due to the exercise of warrants postrelated to past public offerings. Gross proceeds received due to these exercises approximated $63,000.

In February 2020, we entered into subscription agreements with institutional investors to purchase 1,250,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 937,501 shares of common stock at a combined public offering price of $4.80 per share and related warrant resulting in gross proceeds of $6.0 million. Each warrant has an exercise price of $6.30 per share and were exercisable six months from the follow-on offering.



date of issuance and will expire five years from the date they were first exercisable.

In April 2020, we issued 1,195,162 shares of common stock at an average price of $8.65 per share pursuant to the 2020 ATM Agreement. We received total proceeds of $10.3 million, prior to deducting transaction expenses. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2020, 750 shares were issued due to the exercise of warrants related to past public offerings. Gross proceeds received due to these exercises approximated $5,000. 

In July 2020, we issued 216,855 shares of common stock at an average price of $8.82 per share through the ATM Prospectus Supplement. We received total proceeds of $1.9 million, net of $0.1 million in transaction expenses. 

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2021 will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements, which include a forecasted increase over our current R&D rate of expenditures, into the year 2024. Such projections are subject to changes in our internally funded preclinical and clinical activities, including unplanned preclinical and clinical activity. We anticipate incurring operating losses for the next several years as we support the preclinical and clinical activities necessary to prepare our drug candidates for successful out licensing, including our efforts to expand our technologies. These factors raise uncertainties about our ability to fund operations in future years. If we need to raise additional capital in order to continue to execute our business plan, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or that we will be able to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us. A failure to raise sufficient capital could adversely impact our ability to achieve our intended business objectives and meet our financial obligations as they become due and payable.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported expenses incurred during the reporting periods. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Acquisition
We acquired Moleculin, LLC on May 2, 2016, and, since such date our financial statements have included the operations of Moleculin, LLC. We account for acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires, among other things, that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and that the fair value of acquired in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) be recorded on the balance sheet. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. Any excess of the consideration transferred over the assigned values of the net assets acquired will be recorded as goodwill. The Company obtained input from third-parties regarding its tangible and intangible assets and other information necessary to measure the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition of Moleculin, LLC. 

Research and Development Costs
We record accrued expenses for estimated costs of our research and development activities conducted by third-party service providers, which include the conducting of pre-clinical studies and the preparation for clinical trials and contract manufacturing activities. We record the estimated costs of research and development activities based upon the estimated amount of services provided but not yet invoiced, and we include these costs in accrued liabilities in the balance sheets and within research and development expense in the statement of operations. These costs are a significant component of our research and development expenses. We record accrued expenses for these costs based on the estimated amount of work completed and in accordance with agreements established with these third parties.
We estimate the amount of work completed through discussions with internal personnel and external service providers as to the progress or stage of completion of the services and the agreed-upon fee to be paid for such services. We make significant judgments and estimates in determining the accrued balance in each reporting period. As actual costs become known, we adjust our accrued estimates. Although we do not expect our estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, our understanding of the status and timing of services performed may vary from our estimates and could result in us reporting amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period. Our accrued expenses are dependent, in part, upon the receipt of timely and accurate reporting from clinical research organizations and other third-party service providers. To date, there

There have been no material differenceschanges to our critical accounting policies and use of estimates from those disclosed in our accrued expensesForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies and use of estimates, refer to actual expenses.

ImpairmentManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Long-Lived Assets
Management reviews long-lived assetsFinancial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be realizable or at a minimum annually during the fourth quarter of the year. If an evaluation is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if an impairment of such asset is necessary. The effect of any impairment would be to expense the difference between the fair value of such asset and its carrying value.
year ended December 31, 2020.



ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Not applicable to us, as we are a smaller reporting company.



ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)(CEO), who is our principal executive officer, and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)(CFO), who is our principal financial and accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our CEO and CFO have evaluated these disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and have determined that such disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as disclosed below.

In light of the material weakness described below, we performed additional procedures during the quarter and additional analysis and procedures post-closing to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard 1305) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

During the last quarter of fiscal 2016, and as our operational activities increased, management determined that it does not have sufficient segregation of duties within its accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to maintain effective segregation of duties on our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and has concluded that the control deficiency represents a material weakness. Management added a full-time controller during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and intends to further increase its accounting staff, as soon as economically feasible and sustainable, to remediate this material weakness.
2021.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recent calendar quarterthe nine months ended September 30, 2021 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our employees are working remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but we do not believe that our adjustments to how we work have materially impacted our internal controls over financial reporting. We continue to monitor and assess the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our internal controls and strive to minimize the impact on our internal control design and operating effectiveness.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings.

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

For information regarding factors that could affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

2020, and in Part II, Item 1A in our prior quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed during this fiscal year. Except as updated below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and in our prior quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed during this fiscal year, each as filed with the SEC.

We, or our third-party manufacturers, may be unable to successfully scale-up manufacturing of our product candidates in sufficient quality and quantity, which would delay or prevent us from developing our product candidates and commercializing approved products, if any.

In order to conduct clinical trials of our product candidates, we will need to manufacture them in large quantities. We, or any manufacturing partners, may be unable to successfully increase the manufacturing capacity for any of our product candidates in a timely or cost-effective manner, or at all. In addition, quality issues may arise during scale-up activities. If we or any manufacturing partners are unable to successfully scale up the manufacture of our product candidates in sufficient quality and quantity, the development, testing and clinical trials of that product candidate may be delayed or become infeasible, and regulatory approval or commercial launch of any resulting product may be delayed or not obtained, which could significantly harm our business. In addition, the supply chain for the manufacturing of our product candidates is complicated and can involve several parties. If we were to experience any supply chain issues, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our product supply could be seriously disrupted. 

Shareholder activism could cause material disruption to our business.

Publicly traded companies have increasingly become subject to campaigns by activist investors advocating corporate actions such as actions related to environment, social and governance (ESG) matters, among other issues. Responding to proxy contests and other actions by such activist investors or others in the future could be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of our Board of Directors and senior management from the pursuit of our business strategies, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On July 29, 2017, we agreed to issue two warrants to purchase 100,000 and 50,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices of $2.41 and $3.00 per share, respectively, to a consultant, subject to approval by Nasdaq of a listing of additional shares application, which was received in August 2017. The consultant was an accredited investor.
We believe that the issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act regarding transactions not involving a public offering.
On May 31, 2016, we completed our initial public offering, which commenced on May 2, 2016, pursuant to which we sold 1,540,026 shares of our common stock at $6.00 per share with gross proceeds of $9,240,156 and net proceeds of $8,464,183 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. The offer and sale of all the shares in the offering were registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-209323), which was declared effective by the SEC on May 2, 2016. Bonwick Capital Partners LLC and Network 1 Financial Securities, Inc. acted as underwriters for the offering.


There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our IPO as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC on May 3, 2016 pursuant to Rule 424(b). No direct or indirect payments were made by us to any of our directors or officers or their associates, to persons owning ten percent or more of our common stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than payments in the ordinary course of business to officers for salaries and those payments disclosed in “Item 1. Business” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2016 with regard to the license arrangements with HPI. Pending the uses described, we intend to invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade instruments, certificates of deposit or direct or guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

20



ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit

Number
No.

 

Description

10.1

   

31.1*

 

   

31.2*

 

   

32.1*

 

   

32.2*

 

   

101.INS*

 

Inline XBRL Instance Document (the Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document) 

   

101.SCH*

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

   

101.CAL*

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

   

101.DEF*

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

   

101.LAB*

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

   

101.PRE*

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
/

* Filed herewith.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MOLECULIN BIOTECH, INC.

 MOLECULIN BIOTECH, INC.

Date: November 10, 2021

By:

/s/ Walter V. Klemp

Walter V. Klemp,

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer)

   
Date: November 13, 201710, 2021

By:

/s/ Walter V. KlempJonathan P. Foster

  Walter V. Klemp,

Jonathan P. Foster,

  
Chief

Executive Officer and Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 13, 2017By:/s/ Jonathan P. Foster
Jonathan P. Foster,
Executive VPVice President & Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



33
22