Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx ☒ Noo ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o☐ Nox ☒

As of ~~September~~March 13, ~~2019,~~2020 the registrant had ~~1,328,171,172~~1,481,471,172 outstanding shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

							January 31, 2020			April 30, 2019
	July 31, 2019			April 30, 2019
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	327,751		$	515,253		$	142,242		$	515,253
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		149,288			138,151			66,952			138,151
Total current assets		477,039			653,404			209,194			653,404

Other assets:
Intangibles		3,549,427			3,549,427			3,549,427			3,549,427
Investment in SG Austria		1,572,193			1,572,193			1,572,193			1,572,193
Other assets		7,372			7,372			7,372			7,372
Total other assets		5,128,992			5,128,992			5,128,992			5,128,992

Total Assets	$	5,606,031		$	5,782,396		$	5,338,186		$	5,782,396

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	67,548		$	121,885		$	340,494		$	121,885
Accrued expenses		539,008			620,966			678,360			620,966
Total current liabilities		606,556			742,851			1,018,854			742,851

Total Liabilities		606,556			742,851			1,018,854			742,851

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6 and 8)

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock: authorized 1,490,000,000 shares, $0.0001 par value, 1,258,171,172 and 1,186,004,505 shares issued and outstanding as of July 31, 2019 and April 30, 2019, respectively		125,817			118,600
Preferred stock, authorized 10,000,000 shares, $0.0001 par value:
Series A Preferred Stock, 0 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2020 and April 30, 2019, respectively								–			–
Common stock: authorized 2,490,000,000 shares, $0.0001 par value, 1,428,471,172 and 1,186,004,505 shares issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2020 and April 30, 2019, respectively								142,847			118,600
Additional paid-in capital		106,059,808			104,966,158			107,305,733			104,966,158
Accumulated deficit		(101,165,446	)		(100,031,371	)		(103,107,876	)		(100,031,371	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(20,704	)		(13,842	)		(21,372	)		(13,842	)
Total stockholders' equity		4,999,475			5,039,545			4,319,332			5,039,545

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	5,606,031		$	5,782,396		$	5,338,186		$	5,782,396

	Three Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,						Nine Months Ended January 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019

Revenue	$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–

Operating Expenses:
Research and development costs		72,330			267,794			113,296			59,144			203,566			442,039
Compensation expense		453,194			417,190			406,006			371,571			1,305,346			1,199,252
Director fees		75,642			81,130			79,269			50,000			237,765			189,502
Legal and professional		110,157			147,636			116,531			57,224			342,142			242,318
General and administrative		422,752			301,613			160,206			138,408			987,686			855,173
Total operating expenses		1,134,075			1,215,363			875,308			676,347			3,076,505			2,928,284

Loss from operations		(1,134,075	)		(1,215,363	)		(875,308	)		(676,347	)		(3,076,505	)		(2,928,284	)

Net loss	$	(1,134,075	)	$	(1,215,363	)	$	(875,308	)	$	(676,347	)	$	(3,076,505	)	$	(2,928,284	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted		1,210,305,834			1,046,496,430			1,375,499,976			1,126,904,505			1,284,500,731			1,084,053,016

	Common stock				Paid-in		Accumulated			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Total Stockholders’			Series A Preferred Stock					Common stock				Paid-in		Accumulated			Other Comprehensive Income			Total Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Loss			Equity			Shares			Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			(Loss)			Equity

Balance, April 30, 2019		1,186,004,505	$	118,600	$	104,966,158	$	(100,031,371	)	$	(13,842	)	$	5,039,545			–		$	–		1,186,004,505	$	118,600	$	104,966,158	$	(100,031,371	)	$	(13,842	)	$	5,039,545

Stock issued for compensation		–		–		104,726		–			–			104,726
Stock issued for services		5,500,000		550		311,266		–			–			311,816
Stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs of $42,000		66,666,667		6,667		551,333		–			–			558,000
Shares issued for compensation																	–			–		–		–		104,726		–			–			104,726
Shares issued for services																	–			–		5,500,000		550		311,266		–			–			311,816
Shares issued for cash, net of issuance costs of $70,000																	–			–		66,666,667		6,667		551,333		–			–			558,000
Stock options granted		–		–		126,325		–			–			126,325			–			–		–		–		126,325		–			–			126,325
Foreign currency translation adjustment		–		–		–		–			(6,862	)		(6,862	)		–			–		–		–		–		–			(6,862	)		(6,862	)
Net loss		–		–		–		(1,134,075	)		–			(1,134,075	)		–			–		–		–		–		(1,134,075	)		–			(1,134,075	)
Balance, July 31, 2019		1,258,171,172	$	125,817	$	106,059,808	$	(101,165,446	)	$	(20,704	)	$	4,999,475			–			–		1,258,171,172		125,817		106,059,808		(101,165,446	)		(20,704	)		4,999,475

Shares issued for compensation																	–			–		–		–		104,727		–			–			104,727
Shares issued for services																	–			–		3,700,000		370		73,183		–			–			73,553
Shares issued for cash, net of issuances costs of $24,500																				–		70,000,000		7,000		318,500		–			–			325,500
Share issued for cash																	1																	1
Stock options granted																	–			–		–		–		98,409		–			–			98,409
Foreign currency translation adjustment																	–			–		–		–		–		–			(66	)		(66	)
Net loss																	–			–		–		–		–		(1,067,122	)		–			(1,067,122	)

Balance, October 31, 2019																	1					1,331,871,172		133,187		106,654,628		(102,232,568	)		(20,770	)		4,534,477

Shares issued for compensation																	–			–		6,600,000		660		99,578		–			–			100,238
Shares issued for services																	–			–		–		–		26,092		–			–			26,092
Shares issued for cash																				–		90,000,000		9,000		441,000		–			–			450,000
Share repurchased for cash																	(1	)																(1	)
Stock options granted																	–			–		–		–		84,436		–			–			84,436
Foreign currency translation adjustment																	–			–		–		–		–		–			(602	)		(602	)
Net loss																	–			–		–		–		–		(875,308	)		–			(875,308	)
Balance, January 31, 2020																	–		$	–		1,428,471,172	$	142,847	$	107,305,733	$	(103,107,876	)	$	(21,372	)	$	4,319,332

Balance, April 30, 2018		1,013,260,644	$	101,326	$	101,636,215	$	(95,964,143	)	$	(4,709	)	$	5,768,689			–		$	–		1,013,260,644	$	101,326	$	101,636,215	$	(95,964,143	)	$	(4,709	)	$	5,768,689

Stock issued for compensation		–		–		92,070		–			–			92,070
Stock issued for services		–		–		45,800		–			–			45,800
Stock issued for cash, net of issuance costs of $105,000		66,239,316		6,624		1,388,376		–			–			1,395,000
Shares issued for compensation																	–			–		–		–		92,070		–			–			92,070
Shares issued for services																	–			–		–		–		45,800		–			–			45,800
Shares issued for cash, net of issuance costs of $105,000																	–			–		66,239,316		6,624		1,388,376		–			–			1,395,000
Stock options granted		–		–		113,225		–			–			113,225			–			–		–		–		113,225		–			–			113,225
Foreign currency translation adjustment		–		–		–		–			(1,273	)		(1,273	)		–			–		–		–		–		–			(1,273	)		(1,273	)
Net loss		–		–		–		(1,215,363	)		–			(1,215,363	)		–			–		–		–		–		(1,215,363	)		–			(1,215,363	)
Balance, July 31, 2018		1,079,499,960	$	107,950	$	103,275,686	$	(97,179,506	)	$	(5,982	)	$	6,198,148			–			–		1,079,499,960		107,950		103,275,686		(97,179,506	)		(5,982	)		6,198,148

Shares issued for compensation																	–			–		–		–		92,070		–			–			92,070
Shares issued for services																						1,950,000		195		59,459		–			–			59,654
Stock options granted																	–			–		–		–		96,964		–			–			96,964
Foreign currency translation adjustment																	–			–		–		–		–		–			(6,058	)		(6,058	)
Net loss																	–			–		–		–		–		(1,036,574	)		–			(1,036,574	)

Balance, October 31, 2018																	–			–		1,081,449,960		108,145		103,524,179		(98,216,080	)		(12,040	)		(5,404,204	)
Shares issued for compensation																	–			–		–		–		61,380		–			–			61,380
Shares issued for services																	–			–		–		–		35,430		–			–			35,430
Shares issued for cash, net of issuance costs of $35,000																						45,454,545		4,545		460,455		–			–			465,000
Stock options granted																	–			–		–		–		72,484		–			–			72,484
Foreign currency translation adjustment																	–			–		–		–		–		–			3,544			(6,058	)
Net loss																	–			–		–		–		–		(676,647	)		–			(676,347	)
Balance, January 31, 2019																	–		$	–		1,126,904,505	$	112,690	$	104,153,928	$	(98,892,427	)	$	(8,496	)	$	5,365,695

							Nine Months Ended January 31,
	Three Months Ended July 31,						2020			2019
	2019			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,134,075	)	$	(1,215,363	)	$	(3,076,505	)	$	(2,928,284	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock issued for services		311,816			45,800			411,461			140,884
Stock issued for compensation		104,726			92,070			309,691			245,520
Stock based compensation – options		126,325			113,225
Stock-based compensation – options								309,170			282,673
Change in assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(11,137	)		103,250
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets								71,199			215,583
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		(54,337	)		222,394			218,608			(218,945	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		(106,458	)		16,381
Increase in accrued expenses								57,395			46,020
Net cash used in operating activities		(763,140	)		(622,243	)		(1,698,981	)		(2,216,549	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		–			–
Net cash used in investing activities								–			–

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of Series A Preferred Stock								1			–
Repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock								(1	)		–
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance costs		582,500			1,395,000			1,333,500			1,860,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		582,500			1,395,000			1,333,500			1,860,000

Effect of currency rate exchange on cash		(6,862	)		(1,273	)		(7,530	)		(3,787	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(187,502	)		771,484
Net decrease in cash								(373,011	)		(360,336	)

Cash at beginning of the period		515,253			1,059,798			515,253			1,059,798
Cash at end of the period	$	327,751		$	1,831,282		$	142,242		$	699,462

Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Cash paid during the periods for taxes	$	800		$	–		$	800		$	–

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activity:
Issuance costs for shares issued	$	24,500		$	–

PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc. (“Company”) is a biotechnology company focused on developing and preparing to commercialize cellular therapies for ~~cancer~~certain solid tumor cancers and diabetes based upon a proprietary cellulose-based live cell encapsulation technology known as “Cell-in-a-Box^®.” The Cell-in-a-Box^®technology is intended to be used as a platform upon which therapies for several types of cancer, including locally advanced, inoperable, non-metastatic pancreatic cancer (“LAPC”), and Type 1 and ~~insulin dependent~~insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes ~~will be~~are being developed.

The Company is developing therapies for pancreatic and other solid cancerous tumors by using genetically engineered live human cells that are capable of converting a cancer prodrug into its cancer-killing form, by encapsulating those cells using the Cell-in-a-Box^®technology and placing those capsules in the blood supply as close as possible to the cancerous tumor. In this way, when the cancer prodrug is administered to a patient with a particular type of cancer that may be affected by the active form of the prodrug, the killing of the patient’s tumor may be optimized.

The Company ~~is also~~has been examining ways to exploit the benefits of the Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulation technology to develop therapies for cancer that involve prodrugs based upon certain constituents of theCannabis plant; these constituents are of the class of compounds known as “cannabinoids.” Until the IND involving LAPC has been submitted to the FDA, the Company will not be spending any further resources developing this program.

In addition, the Company ishas been involved in preclinical studies to determine if its cancer therapy can slow the production and/or accumulation of malignant ascites fluid in the abdomen that often accompanies the growth of several types of abdominal cancers. Until the IND involving LAPC has been submitted to the FDA, the Company will not be spending any further resources developing this program.

Finally, the Company ishas been developing a therapy for Type 1 diabetes and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes based upon the encapsulation of a human liver cell line genetically engineered to produce, store and secrete insulin at levels in proportion to the levels of blood sugar in the human body. The Company is also exploring the possibility of encapsulating human insulin-producing stem cells and islet cells and transplanting them into a diabetic ~~patient.All~~patient. All three types of cells will be encapsulated using the Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulation technology. Each method is designed to function as a bio-artificial pancreas for purposes of insulin production. Until the IND involving LAPC has been submitted to the FDA, the Company will not be spending any further resources developing this program.

The Cell-in-a-Box^® capsules are largely composed of cellulose (cotton) and are ~~bio-inert.~~bio-inert in the human body. The Cell-in-a-Box encapsulation technology potentially enables genetically engineered live human cells to be used as miniature factories. The technology results in the formation of pin-head sized cellulose-based porous capsules in which genetically modified live human cells can be encapsulated and maintained. They are protected from environmental challenges, such as the sheer forces associated with bioreactors, passage through catheters and needles, etc., enabling greater growth and production of the end-product.

The Company is ~~using~~seeking to utilize the Cell-in-a-Box^®encapsulation technology to develop a therapy for certain solid cancerous tumors through targeted chemotherapy. For pancreatic cancer, the Company is encapsulating genetically engineered live human cells that produce an enzyme designed to convert the prodrug ifosfamide into its cancer-killing form. The capsules containing these cells will be implanted in a patient in the blood supply to the pancreas as near as possible to the ~~pancreas tumor.~~tumor in the pancreas. The cancer prodrug ifosfamide will then be given intravenously at ~~one-third the normal dose. In this way, it~~a very low dose (1 g/m²). It is believed that the ifosfamide will be converted at the site of the tumor in addition to the liver where it is normally converted. The Company believes placement of the Cell-in-a-Box^® capsules in close proximity to the tumor enables the production of optimal concentrations of the “cancer-killing” form of ifosfamide at the site of the tumor. The cancer-killing metabolite of ifosfamide has a short half-life, which the Company believes will result in little to no side effects from the chemotherapy.

A critical unmet medical need exists for patients with LAPC whose tumor in the pancreas ~~tumor~~ no longer responds after 4-6 months of treatment with either Abraxane^® plus gemcitabine or the 4-drug combination known as FOLFIRINOX (both combinations are the current standards of care for pancreatic cancer). We believe these patients have no effective treatment alternative once their tumors ~~no longer respond~~stop responding to these therapies. Two of the most commonly used treatments for such patients are 5-fluorouiracil (“5-FU”) or capecitabine (a prodrug of 5-FU) plus radiation (chemoradiation therapy). Both treatments are only marginally effective in treating the tumor in the pancreas and result in serious side effects. More recently, radiation treatment alone is being used at some cancer centers in the United States (“U.S.”). The Company is developing a therapy comprised of Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulated live cells implanted ~~near~~as close as possible to the cancerous tumor in a patient’s pancreas ~~tumor~~ followed ~~treatment with~~by low doses of the cancer prodrug ~~ifosfamide.~~ifosfamide administered intravenously. The Company believes that its treatment can serve as a “consolidation therapy” with the current standards of care for patients with LAPC and thus address this critical unmet medical need.

Subject to approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Company plans to commence a clinical trial involving patients with LAPC whose tumors have ceased to respond to either Abraxane^® plus gemcitabine or FOLFIRINOX after 4-6 ~~months.~~months of treatment. The Company had a Pre-Investigational New Drug Application meeting (“Pre-IND meeting”) with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research of the FDA (“CBER”) in January 2017. At that Pre-IND meeting, the FDA communicated its agreement with certain aspects of the Company’s clinical development plan, charged the Company with completing numerous tasks and provided the Company with the guidance on the tasks the Company believes is needed to complete ~~for~~ a successful IND, although no assurance ~~could~~can be given whether the FDA will approve the Company’s IND for LAPC once it is ~~submitted.~~ submitted to the FDA. Since the pre-IND meeting, the Company has completed the Cell-in-a-Box^®engineering runs and manufacturing production runs along with most of the studies intended to provide data necessary for the completion of the Company’s IND for LAPC.

The Company is continuing to work on projects related to its planned IND submission for LAPC. Among other things, this work includes completion of each Module within the IND, the Investigator’s Brochure, the Pharmacy Manual, the Protocol for the LAPC clinical trial, ~~would~~a container closure integrity test of the Company’s clinical trial product that will be conducted over the course of two years, a pyrogenicity test, preparation of the angiography guidelines for implantation of the encapsulated cells for use in the LAPC clinical trial and a two-year stability study of the Company’s clinical trial product. The work also includes preparation of a Drug Master File, drafting change history related to the manufacturing process that existed when the preclinical studies were conducted compared to the current manufacturing process for the Company’s clinical trial product and publication of the IND in concert with the Company’s U.S. Agent for the FDA. The Company will need to raise additional funds to complete preparation of its IND submission to the FDA for the treatment of LAPC.

The plan is to initially ~~take place~~conduct the LAPC trial in the U.S. with possible study sites in Europe at a later date.

The Company plans to use cannabinoids, constituents of theCannabis plant, to develop therapies for cancer, with the initial target of brain cancer. The Company is focusing on developing specific therapies based on carefully chosen molecules rather than using complexCannabis extracts. ~~Targeted cannabinoid-based chemotherapy utilizing the Cell-in-a-Box~~^® ~~technology offers a “green” approach to treating solid-tumor malignancies.~~

To further itsCannabis therapy development plans, the Company entered a Research Agreement with the University of Northern Colorado. The initial goal of the ~~ongoing~~ research was to develop methods for the identification, separation and quantification of constituents ofCannabis (some of which are prodrugs) that may be used in combination with the Cell-in-a-Box^®technology to treat cancer. This has been accomplished. ~~Subsequent studies have~~

Further research has been ~~undertaken~~conducted to identify the appropriate cell type that can convert the selected cannabinoid prodrugs into metabolites with anticancer activity. Once identified, the genetically modified cells that will produce the appropriate enzyme to convert ~~that prodrug~~the selected prodrugs will be encapsulated using the Company’s Cell-in-a-Box^® technology. The encapsulated cells and cannabinoid prodrugs identified by these studies will then be combined and used for future studies to evaluate their anticancer effectiveness.

The Company ishas also been developing a therapy to delay the production and accumulation of malignant ascites fluid that results from many types of abdominal tumors. Malignant ascites fluid is secreted by abdominal tumors into the abdomen after the tumors have reached a certain stage of growth. This fluid contains cancer cells that can seed and form new tumors throughout the abdomen. This fluid accumulates in the abdominal cavity, causing swelling of the abdomen, severe breathing difficulties and extreme pain.

Once an abdominal tumor reaches a certain stage of development, it produces malignant ascites in the abdominal cavity. Malignant ascites fluid must be removed by paracentesis (a clinical procedure in which a needle is inserted into the peritoneal cavity and ascites fluid is removed) on a periodic basis. This procedure is painful and costly. There is no therapy that the Company is aware of that prevents or delays the production and accumulation of malignant ascites fluid.

The Company has been involved in a series of preclinical studies conducted by Translational Drug Development (“TD2”), an early stage CRO specializing in oncology, to determine if the combination of Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulated cells plus ifosfamide therapy can delay the production and accumulation of malignant ascites fluid. The data from the TD2 studies indicated that the treatment might play a role in the rate of malignant ascites fluid production and accumulation, but the conclusions were difficult to interpret with certainty. As a result, ~~we plan~~the Company plans to conduct another preclinical study in Germany to determine if ~~our~~its conclusions from the TD2 studies are valid. If this European study shows positive results, the ~~ninth study is successful, we plan~~Company plans to seek approval from the FDA to conduct a Phase 1 clinical trial in the U.S.

The Company plans to develop a therapy for Type 1 diabetes and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes. ~~It is~~The Company has been developing a therapy that involves encapsulation of human liver cells that have been genetically engineered to produce, store ~~insulin~~ and release insulin on demand at levels in proportion to the levels of blood sugar (glucose) in the human body. The Company is also exploring the possibility of using genetically modified stem cells and natural, human ~~insulin producing~~insulin-producing cells (beta islet cells) to treat Type 1 diabetes and ~~insulin dependent~~insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes. All three types of cells will be encapsulated using the Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulation technology. The goal for the three approaches is to develop a bio-artificial pancreas for purposes of insulin production for diabetics who are insulin dependent. After appropriate animal testing has been completed successfully, ~~we will~~the Company plans to seek the FDA’s approval to transplant encapsulated insulin-producing cells into diabetic patients. The goal for these approaches is to develop a bio-artificial pancreas for purposes of insulin production for diabetics who are insulin-dependent.

The Company is a Nevada corporation incorporated in 1996. In 2013, the Company restructured its operations to focus on biotechnology. The restructuring resulted in the Company focusing all its efforts upon the development of a novel, effective and safe way to treat cancer and diabetes. On January 6, 2015, the Company changed its name from Nuvilex, Inc. to PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc. to reflect the nature of its ~~business.~~business in the biotechnology sector.

In 2011, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“SG Austria APA”) with SG Austria Private Limited (“SG Austria”) to purchase 100% of the assets and liabilities of SG Austria. Austrianova Singapore Pte. Ltd. (“Austrianova”) and Bio Blue Bird AG (“Bio Blue Bird”), then wholly-owned subsidiaries of SG Austria, were to become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company on the condition that the Company pay SG Austria $2.5 million and 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock ~~of the Company’s common stock.~~(“Common Stock”). The Company was to receive 100,000 shares of common stock of Austrianova and nine bearer shares of Bio Blue Bird representing 100% of the ownership of Bio Blue Bird.

Through two addenda to the SG Austria APA, the closing date of the SG Austria APA was extended twice by agreement between the parties.

In June 2013, the Company and SG Austria entered a Third Addendum to the SG Austria APA (“Third Addendum”). The Third Addendum changed materially the transaction contemplated by the SG Austria APA. Under the Third Addendum, the Company acquired 100% of the equity interests in Bio Blue Bird and received a 14.5% equity interest in SG Austria. In addition, the Company received nine bearer shares of Bio Blue Bird to reflect its 100% ownership of Bio Blue Bird. The Company paid: (i) $500,000 to retire all outstanding debt of Bio Blue Bird; and (ii) $1.0 million to SG Austria. The Company also paid SG Austria $1,572,193 in exchange for the 14.5% equity interest of SG Austria. The Third Addendum required SG Austria to return the 100,000,000 shares of ~~common stock~~Common Stock held by SG Austria and for the Company to return the 100,000 shares of common stock of Austrianova the Company held.

Effective as of the same date of the Third Addendum, the parties entered into a Clarification Agreement to the Third Addendum (“Clarification Agreement”) to clarify and include certain language that was inadvertently ~~left out of~~omitted from the Third Addendum. Among other things, the Clarification Agreement confirmed that the Third Addendum granted the Company an exclusive, worldwide license to use, with a right to sublicense, the Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulation technology for the development of treatments for cancer and use of Austrianova’s Cell-in-a-Box^®trademark and its associated technology.

With respect to Bio Blue Bird, Bavarian Nordic A/S (“Bavarian Nordic”) and GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt u. Gesundheit GmbH (collectively, “Bavarian Nordic/GSF”) and Bio Blue Bird entered into the Bavarian Nordic/GSF License Agreement in July 2005 whereby Bio Blue Bird was granted a non-exclusive license to develop, make or have made products to treat cancer, obtain marketing approval, sell and offer for sale those products using the clinical data generated from the second pancreatic cancer clinical trial which contained proprietary information from the 1^st Interim Analysis of the trial that used the cells and capsules developed by Bavarian Nordic/GSF (then known as “CapCells”). The licensed patent rights related to this information and technology ~~pertained~~pertain to the countries in which patents had been granted to Bavarian Nordic/GSF.

Bavarian Nordic/GSF and Bio Blue Bird amended the Bavarian Nordic License Agreement in December 2006 to reflect: (i) the license granted was exclusive; (ii) the royalty rate increased from 3% to 4.5%; (iii) Bio Blue Bird assumed the patent prosecution expenses for the existing patents; and (iv) it was made clear that the license will survive as a license granted by one of the licensors if the other licensor rejects performance under the Bavarian Nordic License Agreement due to any actions or declarations of insolvency.

In June 2013, the Company acquired from Austrianova an exclusive, worldwide license to use the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology and trademark for the development of a therapy for Type 1 and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes (“Diabetes Licensing Agreement”).

In October 2014, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide license agreement (“Melligen Cell License Agreement”) with the University of Technology Sydney (“UTS”) in Australia to use insulin-producing genetically engineered human liver cells developed by UTS to treat Type 1 diabetes and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes. The Company plans to develop a therapy for diabetes by encapsulating the Melligen cells using the Cell-in-a-Box^® encapsulation technology.

In December 2014, the Company acquired from Austrianova an exclusive, worldwide license to use the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology in combination with genetically modified non-stem cell lines which are designed to activate cannabinoid prodrug molecules for development of therapies for diseases and their related symptoms using of the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology and trademark (“Cannabis Licensing Agreement”). The Company paid Austrianova $2.0 million to secure this license.

In July 2016, the Company entered into a Binding Memorandum of Understanding with Austrianova pursuant to which Austrianova will actively work to seek an investment partner or partners who will finance clinical trials and further develop products for the therapies for cancer, in exchange for which the Company, Austrianova and any future investment partner or partners will each receive a share of the net revenue from the sale of ~~applicable~~ products in designated territories.

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company and Bavarian Nordic/GSF amended the Bavarian Nordic/GSF License Agreement toto: (i) include the right to ~~import,~~import; (ii) reflect ownership and notification of ~~improvements,~~improvements; (iii) clarify which provisions survive expiration or termination of the Bavarian Nordic/GSF License ~~Agreement, to~~Agreement; (iv) provide rights to Bio Blue Bird to the clinical data after expiration of the licensed patent ~~rights~~rights; and to(v) change the notice address and recipients of Bio Blue Bird.

In August 2017, the Company entered into ~~the~~a Binding Term Sheet with SG Austria and Austrianova (“Binding Term Sheet”) pursuant to which the parties reached an agreement to amend certain provisions in the SG Austria APA, the Diabetes Licensing Agreement the Cannabis Licensing Agreement and the Vin-de-Bona Consulting Agreement (defined below).

In May 2018 and pursuant to the Binding Term Sheet, the Company entered into agreements with SG Austria and Austrianova to amend certain provisions of the SG Austria APA, the Diabetes Licensing Agreement, the Cannabis Licensing Agreement and the Vin-de-Bona Consulting Agreement ~~pursuant to~~required by the Binding Term ~~Sheet.~~Sheet (“Binding Term Sheet Amendments”). The Binding Term Sheet Amendments provide that the Company’s obligation to make milestone payments to Austrianova are eliminated in their entirety under the Cannabis License Agreement and the Diabetes License Agreement, as amended. The Binding Term Sheet Amendments also provide that the Company’s obligation to make milestone payments to SG Austria pursuant to the SG Austria APA, as amended and clarified, is eliminated in its entirety. One of the Binding Term Sheet Amendments also provides that the scope of the Diabetes License Agreement is expanded to include all cell types and cell lines of any kind or description now or later identified, including, but not limited to, primary cells, mortal cells, immortal cells and stem cells at all stages of differentiation and from any source specifically designed to produce insulin for the treatment of diabetes.

In addition, one of the Binding Term Sheet Amendments provides that the Company has a 5-year right of first refusal from August 30, 2017 in the event that Austrianova chooses to sell, transfer or assign at any time during this period the Cell-in-a-Box^® tradename and its Associated Technologies; provided, however, that the Associated Technologies subject to the right of first refusal do not include Bac-in-a-Box^®., which relates to encapsulation of probiotic bacteria and yeast for stomach acid protection and ambient storage. Also, for a period of one year from August 30, 2017 one of the Binding Term Sheet Amendments provides that Austrianova will not solicit, negotiate or entertain any inquiry regarding the potential acquisition of the Cell-in-a-Box^®encapsulation technology and its Associated Technologies.

The Binding Term Sheet Amendments further provide that the royalty payments on gross sales as specified in the SG Austria APA, the Cannabis License Agreement and the Diabetes License Agreement will be changed to 4%. They also provide that the royalty payments on amounts received by the Company from sublicensees’ gross sales under the same agreements will be changed to 20% of the amount received by the Company’s sublicensees, provided, however,that in the event the amounts received by the Company from sublicensees is 4% or less of sublicensees’ gross sales, Austrianova or SG Austria (as the case may be) will receive 50% of what the Company receives up to 2%. In addition, Austrianova or SG Austria (as the case may be) will receive 20% of any amount the Company receives over a 4% royalty payment from sublicensees.

The Binding Term Sheet Amendments also provide that Austrianova will receive 50% of any other financial and non-financial consideration received from the Company’s sublicensees of the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology.

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are unaudited. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and are presented in accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) and with the instructions to this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q.~~10-Q (“Report”). Accordingly, they do not include all the information and Notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2020. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2019 and the Notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2019 (“Form 10-K”) the Company filed with the Commission.

The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~April 30, 2019~~January 31, 2020 contained ~~herein~~in this Report has been derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of April 30, 2019 but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The Company operates independently and through four ~~wholly-owned~~wholly owned subsidiaries: (i) Bio Blue Bird; (ii) PharmaCyte Biotech Europe Limited; (iii) PharmaCyte Biotech Australia Pty. Ltd.; and (iv) Viridis Biotech, Inc. and are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and the rules and regulations of the Commission. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. The Company’s 14.5% investment in SG Austria is presented on the cost method of accounting.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates these estimates including those related to fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets, fair value of stock-based awards, income taxes and contingent liabilities, among others. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial ~~statements; accordingly,~~statements. Therefore, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") standard on goodwill and other intangible assets prescribes a two-step process for impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles, which is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. The first step tests for impairment, while the second step, if necessary, measures the impairment. The Company has elected to perform its annual analysis at the end of its ~~reporting~~fiscal year.

The Company’s intangible assets are licensing agreements related to the use the Cell-in-a-Box^®~~technology~~Trademark and Associated Technologies for the treatment of cancer of $1,549,427 and the Diabetes Licensing Agreement related to the use of the Cell-in-a-Box^®Trademark and Associated Technologies for the treatment of diabetes ~~license for~~of $2,000,000 for an aggregate total of $3,549,427.

These intangible assets have an indefinite life; therefore, they are not amortizable.

The Company concluded that there was no impairment of the carrying value of the intangibles for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from the use of an asset are less than carrying value, a write-down would be recorded to reduce the related asset to its estimated fair value. No impairment was identified or recorded during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

For certain of the Company’s non-derivative financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets for current liabilities qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

The Company ~~adopted~~follows ASC subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments, which permit entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The carrying value of cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, as reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Deferred taxes are calculated using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

A valuation allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets when, in management’s judgment, based upon currently available information and other factors, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The determination of the need for a valuation allowance is based on an on-going evaluation of current information including, among other things, historical operating results, estimates of future earnings in different taxing jurisdictions and the expected timing of the reversals of temporary differences. The Company believes the determination to record a valuation allowance to reduce a deferred income tax asset is a significant accounting estimate because it is based on, among other things, an estimate of future taxable income in the U.S. and certain other jurisdictions, which is susceptible to change and may or may not occur, and because the impact of adjusting a valuation allowance may be material. In determining when to release the valuation allowance established against the Company’s net deferred income tax assets, the Company considers all available evidence, both positive and negative. Consistent with the Company’s policy, and because of the Company’s history of operating losses, the Company does not currently recognize the benefit of all its deferred tax assets, including tax loss carry forwards, which may be used to offset future taxable income. The Company continually assesses its ability to generate sufficient taxable income during future periods in which deferred tax assets may be realized. When the Company believes it is more likely than not that it will recover its deferred tax assets, the Company will reverse the valuation allowance as an income tax benefit in the statements of operations.

The U.S. GAAP method of accounting for uncertain tax positions utilizes a two-step approach to evaluate tax positions. Step one, recognition, requires evaluation of the tax position to determine if based solely on technical merits it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Step two, measurement, is addressed only if a position is more likely than not to be sustained. In step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement with tax authorities. If a position does not meet the more likely than not threshold for recognition in step one, no benefit is recorded until the first subsequent period in which the more likely than not standard is ~~met,~~met. When this occurs, the issue is resolved with the taxing authority or the statute of limitations expires. Positions previously recognized are derecognized when the Company subsequently determines the position no longer is more likely than not to be sustained. Evaluation of tax positions, their technical merits and measurements using cumulative probability are highly subjective management estimates. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

~~On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (“Tax Act”) which made significant changes to U.S. federal income tax law affecting the Company.~~

The Company maintains a full valuation allowance on its U.S. net deferred tax assets. Deferred tax asset remeasurement (tax expense) was offset by a net decrease in valuation allowance, that resulted in no impact on the Company's income tax expense.

Research and development (“R&D”) expenses consist of costs incurred for direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. Costs to acquire technologies, including licenses, that are utilized in R&D and that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Technology developed for use in the Company’s product candidates is expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established.

R&D expenses for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 were $113,296 and $203,566, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2019 were $59,144 and ~~2018 were $72,330 and $267,794,~~$442,039, respectively.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for only those awards ultimately expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option's expected term and stock price volatility. In addition, judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management's best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management's judgment. Thus, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company maintains most of its cash balance at a financial institution located in California. ~~Accounts~~The Company’s account at this institution ~~are~~is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. Uninsured balances aggregated approximately ~~$49,000~~$0 and $127,000 at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and April 30, 2019, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses ~~in such accounts.~~from this account. Management believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

The Company translates the financial statements of its foreign subsidiaries from the local (functional) currencies to U.S. dollars in accordance with FASB ASC 830,Foreign Currency Matters. All assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated at quarter-end exchange rates, while revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Adjustments for foreign currency translation fluctuations are excluded from net loss and are included in other comprehensive income. Gains and losses on short-term intercompany foreign currency transactions are recognized as incurred.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern; however, the following conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to do so. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company ~~has~~had an accumulated deficit of ~~$101,165,446~~$103,107,876 and incurred a net loss for ~~three~~the nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 of ~~$1,134,075.~~$3,076,505. The Company requires substantial additional capital to finance its planned business operations and expects to incur operating losses in future periods due to the expenses related to the Company’s core businesses. The Company has not realized any revenue since it commenced doing business in the biotechnology sector, and there can be no assurance that it will be successful in generating revenues in the future in this sector.

For the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, funding was provided by investors to maintain and expand the ~~Company.~~Company’s operations. Sales of the ~~Company’s common stock~~Common Stock were made under the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 13, 2017 (“S-3”) allowing for offerings of up to $50 million ~~dollars~~ in transactions that are deemed to be “at the market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) or transactions structured as a public offering of a distinct block or blocks of ~~the~~ shares (“Block Trades”) of ~~the Company’s common stock.~~Common Stock. During the ~~three-month~~nine-month period ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company continued to acquire funds through the Company’s S-3 pursuant to which the placement agent sells shares of ~~common stock from~~Common Stock in Block Trades in a program which is structured to provide up to $25 million to the Company less certain commissions pursuant to the S-3.

On August 13, 2019, the Company ~~does not meet~~no longer met the eligibility requirements to use the S-3 to raise ~~capital. The~~capital, and the Company ~~may be able~~ceased to ~~regain the~~ use of the S-3 ~~if it meets one or both of~~to raise capital after that date. In late January 2020, the ~~eligibility criteria, including: (i)~~Company became eligible to use the ~~aggregate market value of the Company’s common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $75 million; or (ii) the common stock is listed and registered on a national securities exchange.~~S-3.

From May 1, 2019 through ~~July 31,~~August 12, 2019 the Company raised capital of approximately ~~$600,000~~$884,000 in Block Trade transactions net of commissions. During the quarter ended January 31, 2020, the Company raised $450,000 through the sale of unregistered shares of its Common Stock in private placement transactions. Subsequent to ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company raised additional capital in the amount of ~~$350,000 from Block Trades.~~

For the time being, the Company plans to sell unregistered securities in private placements. Also, an investment group which has been funding the Company since 2014 and has invested approximately $9.50 million has plans to invest between $2.5 and $3 million in the next 12 to 18 months. The Company also has the ability to reduce consulting expenses and the R&D expenses significantly should funding be delayed.

Management determined that these plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company believes the cash on hand at July 31, 2019, the ability to raise capital$65,000 through the ~~continued~~ sale of unregistered shares of its ~~common stock and any~~Common Stock in private placement ~~offerings~~transactions and $186,000 net of ~~common stock~~commissions, in ~~which~~Block Trades pursuant to the S-3.

The Company ~~may engage in will provide sufficient~~plans to continue to sell registered securities using the S-3 to raise capital to ~~meet~~fund operations and R&D expenses until it files its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~Company’s capital requirements and~~fiscal year ended April 30, 2020 with the Commission, at which time it believes the S-3 will no longer be available to ~~fund the Company’s operations through September 30, 2020.~~use to raise capital.

On May 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. This ASU retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases, and the classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the current accounting literature. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The Company elected the available practical expedients on adoption. Adoption of the new standard resulted in an immaterial amount of total lease liabilities and ROU assets of as of May 1, 2019.

The Company does not anticipate any material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of the following accounting pronouncements issued during 2018 and 2019: (i) ASU 2018-19,ASC Topic 326: Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments; and (ii) ASU No. 2016-13,Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.

ASU No. 2019-12,Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes ("ASU 2019-12"), was issued in December 2019. Under ASU 2019-12, the accounting for income taxes is simplified by eliminating certain exceptions and implementing additional requirements which result in a more consistent application of ASC 740. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2019-12 in 2021, but it does not expect it to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Accrued expenses at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and April 30, 2019 are summarized below:

	July 31, 2019		April 30, 2019		January 31, 2020		April 30, 2019
Payroll related costs	$	382,500	$	358,616	$	421,941	$	358,616
Share issuance compensation		36,914		240,015		–		240,015
Other		119,594		22,335		256,419		22,335
Total	$	539,008	$	620,966	$	678,360	$	620,966

A summary of the ~~Company’s non-vested restricted stock activity~~Common Stock transactions and related weighted average grant date fair value information for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018 are as follows:~~is set forth below:

~~During the three months ended~~In July ~~31,~~ 2017, the Company issued 4,200,000 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock to three ~~consultants.~~consultants pursuant to consulting agreements. The terms of two of the agreements ~~are~~were for twelve months and one agreement iswas for eighteen months. The shares vest monthly over a twelve-month to eighteen-month period and ~~are~~were subject to the consultants providing services under their respective agreements with the Company. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of $0 and ~~$45,800~~$0 for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020, respectively, and ~~2018,~~$11,200 and $73,800 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2019, respectively. There were ~~zero and 500,000~~no unvested shares remaining related to such consulting agreements as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018, respectively.~~

The Company awarded 6,600,000 shares of common stock to officers as part of their compensation agreements for 2018. These shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to them continuing service under the agreements. During the three months ended July 31, 2019, ~~and 2018, the Company recorded a non-cash compensation expense in the amount of $0 and $92,070, respectively. There were zero and 2,750,000 unvested shares as of July 31, 2019 and 2018,~~ respectively.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2019, the ~~four independent directors~~Company issued 1,950,000 shares of ~~the Company’s Board~~restricted Common Stock to two consultants pursuant to ~~Board compensation agreements were issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock relating to their services for the prior year.~~consulting agreements. The terms of ~~the~~these two consulting agreements ~~are for twelve months. The shares vest on the directors’ anniversary date of their agreements. The Company recorded a non-cash expense of $13,804 for the three months ended July 31, 2019.~~

~~Effective July 1, 2018, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock to a consultant. The term of the agreement is~~were for twelve months. The shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to the ~~consultant~~consultants providing services under their respective consulting agreement. An additional agreement with one of the ~~agreement.~~consultants required 500,000 shares vest upon issuance. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of $0 and $12,816 for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020, respectively, and $24,230 and $67,084 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2019, respectively. There were zero and 562,500 unvested shares of Common Stock remaining related to these consulting agreements as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020 and 2019, respectively.

~~During the month of~~In April 2019, two consultants were issued 2,500,000 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock pursuant to their respective consulting ~~agreements.~~agreement. The term of the agreements is for twelve months which covered prior and current periods. The shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to the consultant providing services under their respective consulting ~~agreements.~~agreement. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of ~~$7,209~~$0 and $11,910 for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020. There were ~~83,333~~zero unvested shares as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the four independent directors of the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) were issued 2,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock pursuant to their respective Director Letter Agreement (“DLA”) with the Company. relating to their services for the prior year. The terms of each DLA is for twelve months. The shares vest on the directors’ anniversary date of their respective DLA. The Company recorded a non-cash expense of $0 and $19,212 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2020, respectively. There were zero unvested shares of Common Stock remaining related to these DLAs as of January 31, 2020.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2020, a consultant ~~is owed~~was issued 500,000 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock pursuant to his consulting agreement with the Company. The term of the consulting agreement is for twelve months which covered prior and current periods. The shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to the consultant providing services under his consulting agreement. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of ~~$3,306~~$0 and $17,350 for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019. As of July 31, 2019, 500,000 shares remained unissued.~~2020, respectively.

~~The~~In April 2019, the Company awarded 6,600,000 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock to officers as part of their respective executive compensation ~~agreements~~agreement for 2019. These shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to them continuing service under their respective executive compensation ~~agreements.~~agreement. During the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company recorded a non-cash compensation expense in the amount of ~~$104,726.~~$69,438 and $278,891, respectively. There were ~~2,750,000~~zero unvested shares as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019, three~~2020, four independent directors of the ~~Company’s~~ Board ~~of Directors (“Board”)~~ were issued ~~1,500,000~~2,000,000 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock pursuant to their respective ~~Director Letter Agreement (“DLA”)~~DLA with the Company. Each share issuance under a DLA covers a twelve-month period. The shares vest upon the appointment of a director pursuant to a DLA. The DLA is automatically renewed and a new grant of shares of Common Stock occurs upon on the anniversary date of ~~the~~each DLA. The Company recorded a non-cash expense of ~~$11,642~~$18,998 and $46,433 for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020, respectively. There were zero unvested shares remaining related to a DLA as of January 31, 2020.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, a consultant was issued 2,000,000 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock pursuant to his services onas the Chairman of the Company’s Medical and Scientific Advisory Board over a four-year period. This share issuance covered prior and current periods. The shares vest ~~monthly over the four-year period and~~upon issuance are subject to the consultant providing services to the Company. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of ~~$7,150~~$0 and $11,851 for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019. As~~2020, respectively. There were zero unvested shares remaining related to his compensation agreements as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019, zero shares remained unissued.~~2020.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2020, five consultants were issued 2,200,000 shares of restricted Common Stock pursuant to their respective consulting agreement with the Company. The terms of the agreements are for twelve months. The shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to the consultant providing services under the consultant’s respective consulting agreement. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of $26,092 and $46,895 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2020, respectively. There were 750,000 unvested shares remaining related to these consulting agreements as of January 31, 2020.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2020, a consultant was issued 500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock pursuant to his services as the Company’s Chairman of its Medical and Scientific Advisory Board over a twelve-month period. The shares vest upon issuance. The Company recorded a non-cash consulting expense in the amount of $4,600 and $6,133 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2020, respectively.

In January 2020, the Company awarded 6,600,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to officers as part of their executive compensation agreements for 2020. These shares vest monthly over a twelve-month period and are subject to them continuing service under their respective executive compensation agreement. During the three and nine months ended January 31, 2020, the Company recorded a non-cash compensation expense in the amount of $30,800 and $30,800, respectively. There were 6,050,000 unvested shares remaining related to the executive compensation agreements as of January 31, 2020.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2020, the Company entered into three stock subscription agreements resulting in the sale and issuance of ninety million (90 million) shares of restricted Common Stock. The Company received $450,000 from the sale of these shares.

All shares described above were issued without registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon the exemption afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company sold and issued approximately ~~66.7~~136.7 and ~~66.2~~111.7 million shares of ~~common stock,~~registered Common Stock, respectively, at prices ranging from approximately $0.01 to $0.03 per ~~share.~~share as Block Trades pursuant to the Company’s S-3. Net of underwriting discounts, legal, accounting and other offering expenses, the Company received net proceeds of approximately ~~$558,000~~$884,000 and ~~$1.4~~$1.9 million from the sale of these shares for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

On October 30, 2019, the Company issued one share of its Series A Preferred Stock to its Chief Executive Officer as described in detail in Note 11 – Preferred Stock. On October 31, 2019, ~~and 2018, respectively.~~the Board passed a resolution recommending to shareholders that they approve the amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock by 1,000,000,000 from 1,490,000,000 to 2,490,000,000 shares. Subsequently, on October 31, 2019, by a written consent executed by holders of a majority of the voting power of the Company’s outstanding stock, the Company’s stockholders approved such an amendment. On October 31, 2019 such amendment was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.

A summary of the Company’s unvested restricted stock activity and related weighted average grant date fair value information for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 are as follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
						Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested, April 30, 2019		4,600,000		$	0.05		4,600,000		$	0.05
Granted		5,500,000			0.05		15,800,000			0.05
Vested		(7,266,667	)		0.05		(13,600,000	)		0.05
Unvested, July 31, 2019		2,833,333		$	0.05
Unvested, January 31, 2020							6,800,000		$	0.05

As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company had ~~108,950,000~~94,650,000 outstanding stock options to its directors and officers (collectively, “Employee Options”) and consultants (collectively, “Non-Employee Options”).

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company granted ~~1,500,000~~11,000,000 and zero Employee Options, respectively. During the nine months ended January 31, 2020, 25,000,000 options expired.

The fair value of the Employee Options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, based on the following weighted average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended July 31,				Nine Months Ended January 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Risk-free interest rate		2.1%		–		1.8%		–
Expected volatility		91%		–		91%		–
Expected lives (years)		2.5		–		2.7		–
Expected dividend yield		0.00%		–		0.00%		–

The Company’s computation of expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of ~~its~~ publicly traded ~~stock.~~Common Stock. For stock option grants issued during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company used a calculated volatility for each grant. The Company lacks adequate information about potential exercise behavior and has determined the expected term assumption under the simplified method provided for under ASC 718, which averages the contractual term of the Company’s stock options of five years with the average vesting term of two and one-half years for an average of three years. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact the Company has never paid cash dividends and presently has no intention of paying cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of the grant for instruments with a similar expected life.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company granted 1,200,000 and 1,200,000 Non-Employee Options, respectively. During the three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company granted nozero and zero Non-Employee ~~Options.~~Options, respectively.

Non-Employee Option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period. The value of the options was determined as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and compensation expense is being recognized over the service period.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 are shown below:

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Outstanding, April 30, 2019		107,450,000	$	0.11	$	0.11		107,450,000		$	0.11	$	0.11
Issued		1,500,000		0.04	$	0.04		12,200,000		$	0.04	$	0.04
Forfeited		–		–		–		(25,000,000	)	$	0.19	$	0.19
Exercised		–		–		–		–			–		–
Outstanding, July 31, 2019		108,950,000	$	0.11	$	0.10
Exercisable, July 31, 2019		105,200,000	$	0.11		–
Outstanding, January 31, 2020								94,650,000		$	0.08	$	0.07
Exercisable, January 31, 2020								85,900,000		$	0.08		–
Vested and expected to vest		108,950,000	$	0.11		–		94,650,000		$	0.08		–

A summary of the activity for unvested stock options during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 is as follows:

	Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
						Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested, April 30, 2019		6,200,000		$	0.05		6,200,000		$	0.05
Granted		1,500,000		$	0.04		12,200,000		$	0.04
Vested		(3,950,000	)	$	0.05		(9,650,000	)	$	0.05
Forfeited		–			–		–			–
Unvested, July 31, 2019		3,750,000		$	0.05
Unvested, January 31, 2020							8,750,000		$	0.04

The Company recorded ~~$116,914~~$74,025 and ~~$76,733~~$51,153 of stock-based compensation related to the issuance of Employee Options to certain officers and directors in exchange for services during the three months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and ~~2018,~~$284,934 and $204,619 during the nine months ended January 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. At ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there remained ~~$141,257~~$194,758 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested Employee Options granted to officers and directors, to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of the remaining ~~five~~eleven months in the calendar year. The unvested options vest at 750,000 shares per month and are expected to be fully vested on December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

The Company recorded ~~$9,411~~$10,411 and ~~$36,492~~$21,331 of stock-based compensation related to the issuance of Non-Employee Options in exchange for services during the three months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and ~~2018,~~$24,237 and $78,054 during the nine months ended January 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. ~~The~~At January 31, 2020, there remained $17,089 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested Non-Employee Options ~~were~~granted to consultants, to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of the remaining five months. The unvested Non-Employee Options vest at 100,000 shares per month and are expected to be fully vested on ~~July 31, 2019.~~June 30, 2020.

The following table summarizes ranges of outstanding stock options by exercise price at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019:~~2020:

Exercise Price	Exercise Price	Number of Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) of Outstanding Options		Weighted Average Exercisable Price		Number of Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price of Exercisable Options		Exercise Price	Number of Options Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) of Outstanding Options		Weighted Average Exercisable Price		Number of Options Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price of Exercisable Options
$	0.190		25,000,000		0.08	$	0.190		25,000,000	$	0.190	0.110		27,200,000		0.06	$	0.110		27,200,000	$	0.110
$	0.110		27,200,000		0.22	$	0.110		27,200,000	$	0.110	0.184		250,000		0.11	$	0.184		250,000	$	0.184
$	0.184		250,000		0.36	$	0.184		250,000	$	0.184	0.063		15,600,000		0.55	$	0.063		15,600,000	$	0.063
$	0.063		15,600,000		0.85	$	0.063		15,600,000	$	0.063	0.104		10,450,000		1.35	$	0.104		10,450,000	$	0.104
$	0.104		10,450,000		1.68	$	0.104		10,450,000	$	0.104	0.0685		600,000		1.25	$	0.0685		600,000	$	0.0685
$	0.0685		600,000		1.75	$	0.0685		600,000	$	0.0685	0.058		2,450,000		1.80	$	0.058		2,450,000	$	0.058
$	0.058		2,450,000		2.18	$	0.058		2,450,000	$	0.058	0.0734		1,200,000		2.25	$	0.0734		1,200,000	$	0.0734
$	0.0734		1,200,000		2.75	$	0.0734		1,200,000	$	0.0734	0.0729		1,800,000		2.44	$	0.0729		1,800,000	$	0.0729
$	0.0729		1,800,000		2.95	$	0.0729		1,800,000	$	0.0729	0.089		1,200,000		2.46	$	0.089		1,200,000	$	0.089
$	0.089		1,200,000		2.97	$	0.089		1,200,000	$	0.089	0.0553		500,000		1.35	$	0.0553		500,000	$	0.0553
$	0.0553		500,000		1.60	$	0.0553		500,000	$	0.0553	0.0558		9,000,000		1.75	$	0.0558		9,000,000	$	0.0558
$	0.0558		9,000,000		2.05	$	0.0558		9,000,000	$	0.0558	0.0534		1,200,000		3.60	$	0.0534		1,200,000	$	0.0534
$	0.0534		1,200,000		4.10	$	0.0534		1,200,000	$	0.0534	0.0539		1,000,000		1.62	$	0.0539		1,000,000	$	0.0539
$	0.0539		1,000,000		1.88	$	0.0539		1,000,000	$	0.0539	0.0683		500,000		1.71	$	0.0683		500,000	$	0.0683
$	0.0683		500,000		1.96	$	0.0683		500,000	$	0.0683	0.0649		500,000		1.85	$	0.0649		500,000	$	0.0649
$	0.0649		500,000		2.10	$	0.0649		500,000	$	0.0649	0.0404		1,000,000		2.13	$	0.0404		1,000,000	$	0.0404
$	0.0404		1,000,000		2.38	$	0.0404		1,000,000	$	0.0404	0.0370		500,000		2.21	$	0.0370		500,000	$	0.0370
$	0.0370		500,000		2.46	$	0.0370		500,000	$	0.0370	0.0495		9,000,000		2.48	$	0.0495		9,000,000	$	0.0495
$	0.0495		9,000,000		2.78	$	0.0495		5,250,000	$	0.0495	0.0380		1,200,000		4.65	$	0.0380		700,000	$	0.0380
$												0.0340		500,000		2.35	$	0.0340		500,000	$	0.0340
$												0.0408		9,000,000		2.96	$	0.0408		750,000	$	0.0408
	Total		108,950,000		1.05	$	0.11		105,200,000	$	0.11	Total		94,650,000		1.27	$	0.08		85,900,000	$	0.08

The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$1,250.~~$125,970. This represents options whose exercise price was less than the closing fair market value of ~~the Company’s common stock~~Common Stock on ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 of approximately ~~$0.039~~$0.056 per share.

The warrants issued by the Company are equity-classified. The fair value of the warrants was recorded as additional paid-in-capital, and no further adjustments are made.

For stock warrants paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, the Company recognizes consulting expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505.

The Company issued a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (“May 2018 Warrant”) to Aeon Capital, Inc. (“Aeon”) dated May 30, 2018 for a Block Trade pursuant to the Company’s engagement agreement with Aeon dated February 22, 2018 (“Engagement Agreement”). The May 2018 Warrant provides Aeon the right to purchase 1,388,889 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock based upon this Block Trade. The Company classified the May 2018 Warrant as ~~equity, and the~~equity. The May 2018 Warrant has a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.02 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the Company determined the aggregate value of the May 2018 Warrant to be approximately $19,000. The May 2018 Warrant has a cashless exercise feature.

The Company issued a warrant to Aeon dated June 28, 2018 (“June 2018 Warrant”) for a Block Trade pursuant to the Engagement Agreement. The June 2018 Warrant provides Aeon with the right to purchase 1,923,077 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock based upon a Block Trade. The Company classified the June 2018 Warrant as ~~equity, and the~~equity. The June 2018 Warrant has a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.03 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the Company determined the aggregate value of the June 2018 Warrant to be approximately $38,000. The June 2018 Warrant has a cashless exercise feature.

The Company issued a warrant to Aeon dated November 1, 2018 (“November 2018 Warrant”) for a Block Trade pursuant to the Engagement Agreement. The November 2018 Warrant provides Aeon with the right to purchase 2,272,727 shares of restricted Common Stock based upon a Block Trade. The Company classified the November 2018 Warrant as equity. The November 2018 Warrant has a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.01 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the Company determined the aggregate value of the November 2018 Warrant to be approximately $19,000. The November 2018 Warrant has a cashless exercise feature.

The Company issued a Warrant to Aeon dated June 13, 2019 (“June 2019 Warrant”) for a Block Trade pursuant to the Engagement Agreement. The June 2019 Warrant provides Aeon with the right to purchase 1,388,889 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock based upon a Block Trade. The Company classified the June 2019 Warrant as ~~equity, and the~~equity. The June 2019 Warrant has a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.01 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the Company determined the aggregate value of the June 2019 Warrant to be approximately $9,000. The June 2019 Warrant has a cashless exercise feature.

The Company issued a Warrant to Aeon dated July 15, 2019 (“July 2019 Warrant”) for a Block Trade pursuant to the Engagement Agreement. The July 2019 Warrant provides Aeon with a right to purchase 1,944,444 shares of ~~common stock~~restricted Common Stock based upon a Block Trade. The Company classified the July 2019 Warrant as ~~equity, and the~~equity. The July 2019 Warrant has a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.01 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the Company determined the aggregate value of the July 2019 Warrant to be approximately $12,000. The July 2019 Warrant has a cashless exercise feature.

The Company issued two Warrants to Aeon dated August 7, 2019 (“August 2019 Warrants”) for two Block Trades pursuant to the Engagement Agreement. The August 2019 Warrants provide Aeon with a right to purchase 3,500,000 shares of restricted Common Stock based upon two Block Trades. The Company classified the August 2019 Warrants as equity. The August 2019 Warrants have a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.01 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the Company determined the aggregate value of the August 2019 Warrants to be approximately $12,000. The August 2019 Warrants have a cashless exercise feature.

A summary of the Company’s warrant activity and related information for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 are shown below:

	Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, April 30, 2019		42,077,797	$	0.09		42,077,797		$	0.09
Issued		3,333,333		0.02		6,833,333			0.01
Expired		–		–		(854,308	)		0.12
Outstanding, July 31, 2019		45,411,130		–
Exercisable, July 31, 2019		45,411,130	$	0.08
Outstanding, January 31, 2020						48,056,822			–
Exercisable, January 31, 2020						48,056,822		$	0.07

The following table summarizes additional information concerning warrants outstanding and exercisable at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019:~~2020:

Exercise Prices	Number of Warrant Shares Exercisable at July 31, 2019		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Warrant Shares Exercisable at October 31, 2019		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price

$0.12		17,854,308		1.38				17,000,000		0.94		–
$0.11		10,000,000		0.65				10,000,000		0.14		–
$0.065		769,231		2.39				769,231		1.88		–
$0.0575		869,565		2.68				869,565		2.18		–
$0.03		2,500,000		3.33				2,500,000		2.82		–
$0.026		1,923,077		3.91				1,923,077		3.41		–
$0.025		2,000,000		2.99				2,000,000		2.48		–
$0.018		1,388,889		3.83				1,388,889		3.33		–
$0.011		2,272,727		4.26				2,272,727		3.75		–
$0.01		2,500,000		4.66				2,500,000		4.15		–
$0.009		3,333,333		4.93				3,333,333		4.42		–
$0.005								3,500,000		4.52		–
		45,411,130		1.91	$	0.08		48,056,822		1.94	$	0.07

The Company is not currently a party to any pending legal proceedings, material or otherwise. There are no legal proceedings to which any property of the Company is subject.

The Company had the following related party transactions during the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The Company owns 14.5% of the equity in SG Austria which is reported on the cost method of accounting. SG Austria has two subsidiaries: (i) Austrianova; and (ii) Austrianova Thailand Co. Ltd. The Company purchased products and services from these subsidiaries in the approximate amounts of ~~$2,400~~$85,000 and ~~$51,000~~$87,000 in the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020, respectively, and ~~2018,~~$48,000 and $168,000 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2019, respectively.

In April 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (“Vin-de-Bona Consulting Agreement”) with Vin-de-Bona Trading Co. Ltd (“Vin-de-Bona”) pursuant to which it agreed to provide consulting services to the Company. Vin-de-Bona is owned by Prof. Walter H. Günzburg (“Prof. Günzburg”) and Brian Salmons, PhD (“Dr. Salmons”), both of whom are involved in numerous aspects of the Company’s scientific endeavors relating to cancer and diabetes. Prof. Günzburg is the Chairman of Austrianova, and Dr. Salmons is the Chief Executive Officer and President of Austrianova. The term of the Vin-de-Bona Consulting Agreement is for 12 months and automatically renews for successive 12-month terms. After the initial term, either party ~~can~~has the right to terminate the Vin-de-Bona Consulting Agreement by giving the other party 30 days’ written notice before the effective date of termination. The amounts incurred for consulting services by Vin-de-Bona for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019 and 2018~~2020 were approximately ~~$13,000~~$3,000 and ~~$1,400,~~$18,000, respectively, and $2,000 and $14,000 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2019, respectively. In addition, during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 the Company ~~owed~~issued 250,000 common shares to Dr. Salmons for being a member of the Company’s Medical and Scientific Advisory Board. The Company recorded a noncash expense of approximately ~~$2,000~~$7,300 relating to these shares for the nine months ended January 31, 2020.

During the month of October 2019, the Company received $70,000 from an officer of the Company as a short-term payable that was non-interest bearing and due on demand. During the three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020, the related party was repaid in full.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2020, the Company issued one share of Series A Preferred Stock to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company for $1 pursuant to a subscription agreement. The Series A Preferred Stock is described in detail in Note 11 – Preferred Stock. During the three months ended January 31, 2020, the Board exercised its right to have the Company redeem the one share of Series A Preferred Stock. It is no longer issued and outstanding.

The Company acquires assets still in development and enters into license agreements with third parties that often require milestone and royalty payments to the third-party contingent upon the occurrence of certain future events linked to the success of the asset in development. Milestone payments may be required, contingent upon the successful achievement of an important point in the development ~~life-cycle~~lifecycle of the pharmaceutical product (e.g., approval of the product for marketing by a regulatory agency). If required by the license agreements, the Company may have to make royalty payments based upon a percentage of the sales of the pharmaceutical products if regulatory approval for marketing is obtained.

The Company determines whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at ~~inception.~~inception of the agreement. Prior to May 1, 2019, the Company generally accounted for operating lease payments by charging them to expense as incurred. Beginning on May 1, 2019, operating leases that have commenced are included in other assets and accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Classification of operating lease liabilities as either current or noncurrent is based on the expected timing of payments due pursuant to the Company’s obligations under the ~~Company’s obligations.~~lease. The Company concluded that as of May 1, 2019, the lease liability and the ROU are immaterial to the condensed consolidated balance sheet; therefore, no amount was included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The Company leases office space related to the administrative activities and at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the remaining term of the lease is 13seven months.

The following table presents the minimum lease payments as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

	Amount		Amount
2020	$	21,717	$	7,110
2021		9,480		9,480
Total minimum lease payments	$	31,197	$	16,590

The Company’s material agreements are identified and summarized in Note 1 – Nature of Business – Company Background and Material Agreements.

The Company has entered into several service agreements, with both independent and related parties, pursuant to which services will be provided over the next four to twenty-four months related to the Company’s planned IND filing. The services include regulatory affairs strategy, advice and completion of the IND submission to the FDA, container closure integrity testing of the clinical trial product syringes over the course of two years, a two year stability study and the preparation of angiography guidelines for implantation of the encapsulated cells for use in the Company’s planned clinical trial in LAPC. The total cost of such service agreements is estimated to be approximately $220,000, of which the related party portion will be $40,000.

The Company entered into executive compensation agreements with its three executive officers in March 2015, each of which was amended in December 2015. The amendments provided that each executive compensation agreement has a term of two years with annual extensions thereafter unless the Company or the officer provides written notification of termination at least ninety days prior to the end of the term or subsequent extensions. The Company entered into a DLA with a new Board member in April 2015 which continues in effect until the member is no longer on the Board.

In March 2017, the Company amended the executive compensation agreements with its three executive officers. The term for each agreement is two years from an effective date of January 1, 2017. At the same time, the Company amended the compensation agreement with the Board member referenced above. It continues in effect until the member is no longer on the Board.

The Company has four independent directors. Each director receives the same compensation: (i) $12,500 in cash for each calendar quarter of service on the Board; (ii) 500,000 fully-paid, non-assessable shares of ~~the Company’s~~ restricted ~~common stock~~Common Stock (“Shares”) annually; and (iii) a five-year option to purchase 500,000 Shares annually at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Shares on the date of grant. The Shares and the options fully vest on the date of the grants.

The Company’s Chief Medical Officer (“CMO”) receives: (i) $10,000 in cash for each calendar month of service as the Company’s CMO; (ii) 1,200,000 Shares annually; and (iii) a five-year option to purchase 1,200,000 Shares at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Shares on the date of the grant. The Shares and the options each vest in the amount of 100,000 Shares, or options, as applicable, per month. The Company will indemnify the CMO for her work as the Company’s CMO.

The Company had no income tax expense for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had a net operating loss (“NOL”) for each period which generated deferred tax assets for NOL carryforwards. The Company provided valuation allowances against the net deferred tax assets including the deferred tax assets for NOL carryforwards. Valuation allowances provided for the net deferred tax asset increased by approximately ~~$201,000~~$270,000 and ~~$301,000~~$710,000 for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

There was no material difference between the effective tax rate and the projected blended statutory tax rate for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited. Based on the assessment of all available evidence including, but not limited to, the Company’s limited operating history in its core business and lack of profitability, uncertainties of the commercial viability of its technology, the impact of government regulations and healthcare reform initiatives and other risks normally associated with biotechnology companies, the Company has concluded that is more likely than not that these operating loss carryforwards will not be realized. Accordingly, 100% of the deferred tax valuation allowance has been recorded against these assets at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

The Company’s policy is to recognize any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had accrued no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

See Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2019 for additional information regarding income taxes.

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing earnings available to ~~common~~ stockholders who own Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares and potentially dilutive ~~common~~ shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period increased to include the number of additional shares of ~~common stock~~Common Stock that would be outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potential ~~common~~ shares of Common Stock outstanding principally include stock options and warrants. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Company incurred losses. Accordingly, the effect of any ~~common stock~~Common Stock equivalent would be anti-dilutive during those periods and are not included in the calculation of diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding.

	Three Months Ended July 31,						Nine Months Ended January 31,
	2019			2018			2020			2019
Net loss	$	(1,134,075	)	$	(1,215,363	)	$	(3,076,505	)	$	(2,928,284	)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		1,210,305,834			1,046,496,430			1,284,500,731			1,084,053,016
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		1,210,305,834			1,046,496,430			1,284,500,731			1,084,053,016
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

	Three Months Ended July 31,				Nine Months Ended January 31,
	2019		2018		2020		2019
Excluded options		108,950,000		95,250,000		94,650,000		96,450,000
Excluded warrants		45,411,130		37,305,070		48,056,822		39,577,797
Total excluded options and warrants		154,361,130		132,555,070		142,706,822		136,027,797

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001, of which ~~13,500 shares have~~one share has been designated as "Series ~~E Convertible~~A Preferred ~~Stock." There~~Stock". The one share of Series A Preferred Stock was issued on October 30, 2019 and repurchased by the Company on December 3, 2019. As of January 31, 2020, there are no ~~outstanding~~ shares of preferred stock orissued and outstanding.

The description of the Series ~~E Convertible~~A Preferred ~~Stock.~~ Stock below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended.

The Series ~~E Convertible~~A Preferred Stock ~~have~~has the following features:

On February 2, 2020, the Company entered into a share subscription agreement in a private placement for a total of 13,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock for a total of $65,000. There were no fees payable by the Company or warrant coverage relating to the share subscription agreement and the securities were offered and sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) thereof.

From ~~August~~February 1, ~~2019~~2020 through ~~August 8, 2019,~~March 13, 2020, the Company sold ~~70,000,000~~40,000,000 shares of ~~common stock~~Common Stock using the S-3 structured as a Block ~~Trade using the S-3.~~Trade. The issuance of these shares resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately ~~$350,000.~~$200,000. Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement with Aeon , the Company ~~paid~~is required to pay Aeon a fee of 7%, ~~$24,500,~~which equals $14,000 and ~~provided~~provide warrant coverage ofequal to 5% of the number of shares of ~~commons stock~~Common Stock sold in the Block Trade with a five-year term ~~for 3,500,000~~which is 2 million warrant ~~shares.~~shares with an exercise price of $0.005 per share.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations

This ~~Quarterly~~ Report ~~on Form 10-Q (“Report”)~~ includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of this Report, including any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items, any statements regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning proposed new products or services, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, any statements regarding expected benefits from any transactions and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, forward looking statements can be identified by use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “goal,” “aim,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Thus, investors should refer to and carefully review information in future documents we file with the Commission. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward looking statements, are subject to inherent risk and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risk factors set forth in “Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors” set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2019 and for the other reasons described elsewhere in this Report.

All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this Report are made as of the date of this Report, and we do not intend to update any forward-looking statements except as required by law or applicable regulation. Except where the context otherwise requires, in this Report, the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to PharmaCyte Biotech, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.

We are a biotechnology company focused on developing and preparing to commercialize cellular therapies for various types of cancer and for diabetes that are based upon a proprietary cellulose-based live cell encapsulation technology known as “Cell-in-a-Box^®.” The Cell-in-a-Box^®technology is intended to be used as a platform upon which therapies for several types of cancer, including LAPC, and diabetes are being developed.

A critical unmet medical need exists for patients with LAPC whose tumor in a patient’s pancreas ~~tumor~~ no longer responds after 4-6 months of treatment with either Abraxane^® plus gemcitabine or the 4-drug combination known as FOLFIRINOX (both combinations are the current standards of care). These patients have no effective treatment alternative once their tumor no longer responds to these therapies. Two commonly used treatments for such patients are 5-FU or capecitabine plus radiation (chemoradiation therapy). Both treatments are only marginally effective in treating the tumor and result in serious side effects. ~~More recently,~~Recently, radiation treatment alone is being used at some cancer centers in the U.S.

For LAPC, our therapy is comprised of implanting encapsulated genetically modified live cells in the blood supply as close to the tumor in the pancreas ~~tumor~~ as possible followed by the administration of low doses of the cancer prodrug ifosfamide. We believe that our therapy can serve as a “consolidation therapy” with the current standards of care for patients with LAPC and meet the critical unmet medical need. We are currently working on an IND to submit to the FDA so that we can commence a Phase 2b clinical trial involving LAPC.

We are continuing to work on projects related to the planned IND submission involving LAPC. Among other things, this work includes completion of each Module within the IND, the Investigator’s Brochure, the Pharmacy Manual, the Protocol for the LAPC clinical trial, a container closure integrity test of our clinical trial product that will be conducted over the course of two years, a pyrogenicity test, preparation of the angiography guidelines for implantation of the encapsulated cells for use in the LAPC clinical trial and a two-year stability study of our clinical trial product. The work also includes preparation of a Drug Master File, drafting change history related to the manufacturing process that existed when the preclinical studies involving our product were conducted compared to the current manufacturing process for our clinical trial product and publication of the IND in concert with our U.S. Agent for the FDA.

The plan is to initially conduct the LAPC trial in the U.S. with possible study sites in Europe at a later date. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to make the IND submission to the FDA or that the FDA will approve our submission.

We are also developing ways to use the benefits of the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology to treat forms of cancer that are based upon the use of cannabinoids fromCannabis as prodrugs in much the same way that the Cell-in-a-Box^® plus the cancer prodrug ifosfamide will be used to treat LAPC. Until the IND involving LAPC has been submitted to the FDA, we are not spending any further resources developing this program.

In addition, we are developing a therapy to delay the production and accumulation of malignant ascites fluid that results from many types of abdominal cancerous tumors. Malignant ascites fluid is secreted by abdominal cancerous tumors into the abdomen after the tumors have reached a certain stage of growth. This fluid contains cancer cells that can seed and form new tumors throughout the abdomen. This fluid accumulates in the abdominal cavity, causing swelling of the abdomen, severe breathing difficulties and extreme pain. We are using our therapy for pancreatic cancer to determine if it can prevent or delay the production and accumulation of malignant ascites fluid.

As with ourCannabis program, until the IND involving LAPC has been submitted to the FDA, we are not spending any further resources developing this program.

Finally, we are developing a therapy for Type 1 diabetes and insulin-dependent Type 2 diabetes. Our diabetes therapy consists of encapsulating genetically modified human liver cells, beta islet cells and/or insulin-producing stem cells using the Cell-in-a-Box^®technology and then implanting them in the body to act as a bio-artificial pancreas for insulin production. As with the two previous programs, we are not spending any further resources developing this program until the IND involving LAPC has been submitted to the FDA. However, work at UTS on the Melligen cells continues. The work is being funded by us and UTS. Our portion of the funding was previously paid to UTS.

Non-financial performance indicators used by management to manage and assess how the business is progressing include, but are not limited to, the ability to: (i) acquire appropriate funding for all aspects of our operations; (ii) complete necessary contracts; (iii) complete activities for producing genetically modified live cells that can convert a cancer prodrug to its ~~cancer killing~~cancer-killing form and having them encapsulated and grown in the capsules for use in our planned preclinical studies and clinical trials; (iv) complete all tests required by the FDA for our cellular therapies; (v) ensure the manufacture of our encapsulated live cells is in compliance with current good manufacturing practice (“GMP”) regulations as required by the applicable regulatory agencies so they may be used in our clinical trials; and (vi) have regulatory work completed to enable studies and trials to be submitted to regulatory agencies and be GMP compliant.

There are numerous factors required to be completed successfully to ensure our final product candidates are ready for use in our clinical trials. Therefore, the effects of material transactions with related parties and certain other parties to the extent necessary for such an undertaking may have substantial effects on both the timeliness and success of our current and prospective financial position and operating results. Nonetheless, we are actively working to ensure strong ties and interactions to minimize the inherent risks regarding success. From our assessments to date, we do not believe there are factors which will cause materially different amounts to be reported than those presented in this Report and aim to assess this regularly to provide the most accurate information to our shareholders.

Three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 compared to three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2018~~2019

We had no revenues for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

The following table summarizes our operating expenses and loss from operations for the three and nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively:

The total operating expenses for the three-month period ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019 decreased~~2020 increased by ~~$81,288~~$198,961 from the three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase is attributable to an increase in R&D expenses of $54,152, an increase in director fees of $29,269, an increase in compensation expense of $34,435, an increase in legal and professional expense of $59,307 and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $21,798.

The total operating expenses for the nine-month period ended January 31, 2020 increased by $148,221 from the nine months ended January 31, 2019. The increase is attributable to an increase in director fees of $48,263, an increase in legal and professional expense of $99,824 and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $132,513, and an increase in compensation expense of $106,094, net of a decrease in R&D expenses of $195,464, a decrease in director fees of $4,512, a decrease in legal and professional expense of $37,479 and a decrease in general and administrative expenses of $314,447, net of increases in compensation expense of $36,004 and general and administrative expenses of 121,139.$238,473. The increase in general and administrative expenses was mainly attributable to an increase in travel expense net of a decrease in consulting expense.

The following table presents a summary of our sources and uses of cash for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively:

The net cash used in operating activities for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 is a result of our net losses, ~~decreases~~increases in ~~prepaid expenses,~~ accounts payable and accrued expenses, ~~offset by~~a decrease in prepaid expenses and an increase in securities issued for services and compensation. The cash used in operating activities for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2018~~2019 is a result of our net losses, offset by an increase in stock issued, ~~a decrease~~decreases to prepaid expenses and ~~increases~~ in accounts payable and an increase in accrued expenses. See Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on page 5.7.

There were no investing activities in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

The cash provided from financing activities is mainly attributable to the proceeds from the sale of ~~our common stock.~~Common Stock.

As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, our cash totaled approximately ~~$328,000,~~$142,000, compared to approximately ~~$1.8 million~~$699,000 at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Working capital was approximately a negative ~~$130,000~~$810,000 at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and approximately ~~$1.1 million~~$227,000 at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The decrease in cash is attributable to a lower beginning cash balance, a decrease in proceeds from the sale of ~~our common stock~~Common Stock offset by ~~a decrease~~an increase in our operating expenses which generated a net loss.

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, funding was provided by investors to maintain and expand our operations and R&D. Sales of ~~our common stock~~Common Stock were ~~made under~~consummated using the S-3. ~~During the months ended July 31,~~From May 1, 2019 through August 12, 2019, we continued to acquire funds through our S-3 pursuant to Block ~~Trade~~Trades transactions in a program which is structured to provide up to $25 million dollars to us less certain commissions pursuant to the S-3. We also raised funds from private placements with investors. From ~~August~~May 1, ~~2018~~2019 through ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 we raised capital from private placements of approximately ~~$600,000 in Block Trade transactions.~~$1,400,000.

As of ~~the date of this Report,~~August 13, 2019, we dodid not meet the eligibility requirements to use the S-3. ~~We may be able to regain the use of Form S-3 if~~In late January 2020, we meet one or both of the eligibility criteria, including: (i) the aggregate market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $75 million; or (ii) our common stock is listed and registered on a national securities exchange.

We plan to ~~continue to engage in Block Trade transactions and~~ sell shares of our ~~common stock~~registered Common Stock using the ~~ATM component of~~S-3 until we file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~S-3.~~fiscal year ended April 30, 2020 with the Commission, at which time we believe the S-3 will no longer be available. We ~~also plan to sell Shares in private placements~~will need to raise ~~needed capital. In addition, we have~~additional funds to complete preparation of our IND filing with the ~~ability~~FDA relating to ~~reduce general and administrative costs and R&D expenses significantly should further funding be delayed.~~LAPC.

In Note 2 – Going Concern to our condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in this Report, we note that certain conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We determined, however, that the plans set forth above alleviate substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We believe the cash on hand at July 31, 2019, the ability to raise capital through sales of registered and unregistered shares of our common stock and any public and private offerings of our common stock in which we may engage will provide sufficient capital to meet our capital requirements and to fund our operations through September 30, 2020.

Except as described below, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements that could have a material current effect or that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

The future royalty and other payments under the Third Addendum, as amended, are royalty payments of 4% royalty on all gross sales by us and 20% ~~percent~~ royalty of the amount we receive form sublicensees’ gross sales, provided, however, that in the event the amounts received by us from sublicensees is 4% or less of sublicensees’ gross sales SG Austria will receive 50% of what we receive up to 2%. In addition, SG Austria will receive 20% of any amount we receive over a 4% royalty payment from our sublicensees. SG Austria will also receive 50% of any other financial and non-financial consideration received by us from sublicensees of the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology.

The future royalty and other payments under the Diabetes License Agreement are royalty payments of 4% royalty on all gross sales by us and 20% ~~percent~~ royalty of the amount we receive from sublicensees’ gross sales, provided, however, that in the event the amounts received by us from sublicensees is 4% or less of sublicensees’ gross sales, Austrianova will receive 50% of what we receive up to 2%. In addition, Austrianova will receive 20% of any amount we receive over a 4% royalty payment from sublicensees. Austrianova will also receive 50% of any other financial and non-financial consideration received by us from sublicensees of the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology.

The future royalty and other payments under the Cannabis License Agreement are royalty payments of 4% royalty on all gross sales by us and 20% ~~percent~~ royalty of the amount we receive form sublicensees’ gross sales, provided, however, that in the event the amounts received by us from sublicensees is 4% or less of sublicensees’ gross sales, Austrianova will receive 50% of what we receive up to 2%. In addition, Austrianova will receive 20% of any amount we receive from sublicensees over a 4% royalty payment. Austrianova will also receive 50% of any other financial and non-financial consideration received by us from sublicensees of the Cell-in-a-Box^® technology.

The future royalty, milestone and patent prosecution costs under the Melligen Cell License Agreement are: (i) 6% royalty on gross sales; (ii) 25% royalty on sublicense gross sales; (iii) milestone payments of $50,000 after the first preclinical study; (iv) $100,000 after the successful conclusion of a Phase 1 clinical trial; (v) $450,000 after the successful conclusion of a Phase 2 clinical trial; (vi) $3,000,000 after the successful conclusion of a Phase 3 clinical trial; and (vii) 15% of the costs paid by UTS to prosecute and maintain patents related to the licensed intellectual property.

We entered into several service agreements, with both independent and related parties, pursuant to which services will be provided over the next four to twenty-four months related to our IND involving LAPC. The services include regulatory affairs strategy, advice and completion of the IND submission to the FDA, container closure integrity testing of the clinical trial product syringes over the course of two years, a two year stability study and the preparation of angiography guidelines for implantation of the encapsulated cells for use in our planned clinical trial in LAPC. The total cost is estimated to be approximately $220,000, of which the related party portion will be $40,000.

As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, we leased office space in Laguna Hills, California under a lease ending August 31, 2020.

The following table presents certain payments due by us as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 with respect to our known contractual obligations:

Payments due by period

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than
1 Year

1-3

Years

3-5
Years

More than
5 Years

Total

Less than
1 Year

1-3

Years

3-5
Years

More than
5 Years

Capital Leases

–

Operating Leases

31,197

28,827

2,370

–

16,590

–

Purchase Obligations

–

Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Company’s Balance Sheet under U.S. GAAP

–

Total

31,197

28,827

2,370

–

16,590

–

Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and are presented in accordance with the requirements of Regulation S-X of the Commission and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. However, they do not include all the information and Notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In connection with the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report, we are required to make assumptions and estimates about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time the financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

We discuss our critical accounting estimates and policies in Part II, Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, ~~2018.~~2019. There has been no material change in our critical accounting estimates and policies since April 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

For a discussion of all recently adopted and recently issued but not yet adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.

Our website is located atwww.PharmaCyte.com. In addition, all our filings submitted to the Commission, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all our other reports and statements filed with the Commission are available on the Commission’s web site atwww.sec.gov. Such filings are also available for download free of charge on our website. The contents of the website are not, and are not intended to be, incorporated by reference into this Report or any other report or document filed with the Commission or furnished by us, and any reference to the websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

The information called for by Item 3 is not required for a smaller reporting company.

Our Chief Executive Officer, President and General Counsel, as our principal executive officer (“Chief Executive Officer”), and our Chief Financial Officer, as our principal financial officer (“Chief Financial Officer”), evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit to the Commission pursuant to the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the period specified by the Commission’s rules and forms and are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Also, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some person, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 based on the criteria outlined in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and identified the following material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting:

Because of these material weaknesses, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019,~~2020, our internal controls over financial reporting ~~was~~were not effective based on the COSO criteria.

We are in the process of investigating new procedures and controls for fiscal year 2020. We plan to make reasonable changes to our procedures and controls that we believe are reasonably likely to strengthen and materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Prior to the remediation of these material weaknesses, there remains risk that the processes and procedures on which we currently rely will fail to be sufficiently effective, which could result in material misstatement of our financial position or results of operations and require a restatement. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls-even where we conclude the controls are operating effectively-can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, including instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of a person, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events; accordingly, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, our control systems, as we develop them, may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected and could be material to our financial statements.

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

We are not currently a party to any material pending legal proceedings. There are no material legal proceedings to which any property of ours is subject.

During the three months ended July 31, 2019, we issued two warrants to Aeon for Block Trades. The warrants provide Aeon the right to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock based upon these Block Trades pursuant to the Engagement Agreement. We classified the warrants as equity, and the warrants have a term of five years with an exercise price of approximately $0.01 per warrant share. Using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, we determined the aggregate value of these warrants to be approximately $21,000. The warrants have a cashless exercise feature.

~~The issuance of the warrants without registration under the Securities Act is in reliance upon the exemption afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D.~~

~~During the three months ended July 31, 2019 we issued unregistered securities to our directors as disclosed in this Report, and~~On January 2, 2020, we issued an aggregate of ~~2.0~~6.6 million unregistered shares of ~~restricted common stock~~Common Stock to ~~a consultant for services provided to us.~~our executive officers as disclosed in this Report. The non-cash expense for these share issuances ~~total $311,816.~~totaled $369,600.

On January 2, 2020, we issued an aggregate of 9 million stock options to our three executive officers pursuant to their 2020 executive compensation agreements. The non-cash expense for stock options totaled $212,464.

On November 11, 2019, we issued an aggregate of 60 million unregistered shares of Common Stock through the sale of unregistered Common Stock to accredited investors pursuant to two subscription agreements. The net proceeds received by us were $300,000.

All such ~~shares~~securities were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance upon the exemption afforded by Section 4(a)(2) of that Act based on the limited number of investors, the sophistication of the individuals involved and the use of restrictive legends on the ~~share certificates~~securities issued to prevent a public distribution of the relevant securities. No underwriters were involved in any of these issuances.

* This exhibit is being filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(3)(i) of Regulation S-K which requires a conformed version of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, reflecting all amendments in one document.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Nevada	62-1772151
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
N/A	N/A	N/A

	Large accelerated filer o☐	Accelerated filer o☐
	Non-accelerated filer x☒	Smaller reporting company x☒
	Emerging growth company o☐

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020 and April 30, 2019 (Unaudited)	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (Unaudited)	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Nine Months Ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (Unaudited)	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three and Nine Months Ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (Unaudited)	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Three~~Nine Months Ended ~~July~~January 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (Unaudited)	7

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2429

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2834

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2834

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	3037

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3037

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3037

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3037

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3037

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3037

Item 5.	Other Information	3037

Item 6.	Exhibits	3038

	Signatures	3139

	•	Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
	•	Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
	•	Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

	Three Months Ended January 31,
	2020			2019
Net loss	$	(875,308	)	$	(676,347	)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		1,375,499,976			1,126,904,505
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		1,375,499,976			1,126,904,505
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

	•	~~The holders~~There is one share of preferred stock designated as Series E Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cash out of the assets of the Company before any amount is paid to the holders of any capital stock of the Company of any class junior in rank to the shares of Series E ConvertibleA Preferred Stock;

	•	~~Each share of~~The Series ~~E Convertible~~A Preferred Stock ~~is convertible,~~has a number of votes at any time equal to the ~~holder’s option, into shares~~number of ~~common stock at the average closing bid price~~votes then held by all other shareholders of the ~~common stock for five trading days prior~~Company having a right to vote on any matter plus one. The Certificate of Designations that designated the ~~conversion date; and~~terms of the Series A Preferred Stock cannot be amended without the consent of the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock;

	•	~~At every meeting~~The Company may redeem the Series A Preferred Stock at any time for a redemption price of ~~stockholders every~~$1.00 paid to the holder of ~~shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to 50,000 votes for each~~the share of Series ~~E Convertible~~A Preferred Stock; and

	•	The Series A Preferred Stock ~~with the same and identical voting~~has no rights ~~as a holder~~ of ~~a share of common stock.~~transfer, conversion, dividends, preferences upon liquidation or participation in any distributions to shareholders.

	Three Months Ended
	July 31, 2019			July 31, 2018
Net cash used in operating activities:	$	(763,140	)	$	(622,243	)
Net cash used in investing activities:	$	–		$	–
Net cash provided by financing activities:	$	582,500		$	1,395,000
Effect of currency rate exchange	$	(6,862	)	$	(1,273	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	(187,502	)	$	771,484

	Nine Months Ended
	January 31, 2020			January 31, 2019
Net cash used in operating activities:	$	(1,698,981	)	$	(2,216,549	)
Net cash used in investing activities:	$	–		$	–
Net cash provided by financing activities:	$	1,333,500		$	1,860,000
Effect of currency rate exchange	$	(7,530	)	$	(3,787	)
Net decrease in cash	$	(373,011	)	$	(360,336	)

	·	Insufficient procedures and control documentation to implement control procedures including lack of timely contract preparation and review. We have developed procedures to provide ample review time of financial information, including contract preparation and review by qualified ~~accounting and finance~~ personnel as well as management. We have implemented these procedures, determined they are still insufficient and will continue to review these procedures to determine ways to further improve them.
	·	Insufficient segregation of duties of the Chief Financial Officer. We have delegated some of the duties of our Chief Financial Officer to other personnel within the Company and have added review and approval processes performed by the Chief Executive Officer. However, we have determined that we still have insufficient segregation of the duties of our Chief Financial Officer and will continue to review these procedures to determine ways to further improve them given our limited staff.
	·	Insufficient information technology controls and documentation. We currently use accounting software which we have determined is inadequate to provide the level of controls required by COSO. We are in the process of initiating a review process to fully evaluate the deficiencies in our technology controls and documentation. Based upon the results of this review process, we intend to implement the required remediation ~~measures.~~measures when it is reasonable to do so.

Exhibit No.	Description	Location


3.1*	Conformed version of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended by that Certificate of Amendment previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on November 8, 2019.	Filed herewith

10.1	Share Subscription Agreement between the Company and the Investor dated January 17, 2020.	Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2020.
31.1	Principal Executive Officer Certification required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith

31.2	Principal Financial Officer Certification required by Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith

32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith

101.	Interactive Data Files for the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2019~~2020	Submitted herewith.

~~September~~March 13, ~~2019~~2020	By:/s/ Kenneth L. Waggoner
	Kenneth L. Waggoner
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)


~~September~~March 13, ~~2019~~2020	By:/s/ Carlos A. Trujillo
	Carlos A. Trujillo
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)