UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
ý☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019
|
| |
¨☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-38054
Schneider National, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| | | |
Wisconsin | | 39-1258315 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
| |
3101 South Packerland Drive | | |
Green Bay | Wisconsin | | 54313 |
(Address of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(920) (920)592-2000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesý☒ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yesý☒ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | | ¨☒ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨☐ |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer | | ý☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
| | Smaller reporting company | | ¨
☐ |
| | | |
| | | | Emerging growth company | | ¨
☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨☐ No ý☒
As of OctoberJuly 26, 2018,2019, the registrant had 83,029,500 shares of Class A Common Stock, no par value, outstanding and 93,969,26894,085,005 shares of Class B Common Stock, no par value, outstanding.
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | | | |
| | | Page |
| | | |
|
ITEM 1. | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Page | |
| Note 1 | | | |
| Note 2 | | | |
| Note 3 | | | |
| Note 4 | | | |
| Note 54 | | | |
| Note 6 | | | |
| Note 75 | | | |
| Note 86 | | | |
| Note 9 | | | |
| Note 107 | | | |
| Note 8 | | | |
| Note 9 | | | |
| Note 10 | | | |
| Note 11 | | | |
| Note 12 | | | |
| Note 13 | | | |
ITEM 2. | | | |
ITEM 3. | | | |
ITEM 4. | | | |
|
ITEM 1. | | | |
ITEM 1A. | | | |
ITEM 2. | | | |
ITEM 3. | | | |
ITEM 4. | | | |
ITEM 5. | | | |
ITEM 6. | | | |
|
ITEM 1. | | | |
ITEM 1A. | | | |
ITEM 2. | | | |
ITEM 3. | | | |
ITEM 4. | | | |
ITEM 5. | | | |
ITEM 6. | | | |
| | | |
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
|
| |
3PL | Provider of outsourced logistics services. In logistics and supply chain management, it means a company’s use of third-party businesses, the 3PL(s), to outsource elements of the company’s distribution, fulfillment, and supply chain management services. |
ASC | Accounting Standards Codification |
ASU | Accounting Standards Update |
CODM | Chief Operating Decision Maker |
FASB | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FTFM | First to Final Mile operating segment |
GAAP | United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
IPOLIBOR | Initial Public OfferingLondon InterBank Offered Rate |
SEC | United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
VTL | Van Truckload operating segment |
WSL | Watkins and Shepard Trucking, Inc. and Lodeso, Inc. These businesses were acquired simultaneously in June 20162016. |
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by such Act. These forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, beliefs, plans, or forecasts with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance and trends in our business and industry. Forward-looking statements are often characterized by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “target,” “prospects,” “potential” and“potential,” “forecast,” and other words, terms, and phrases of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, expectations, projections, goals, forecasts, assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. We caution readers that a forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statement.
Risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ, or contribute to actual results differing, materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
Economic and business risks inherent in the truckload and transportation industry, including competitive pressures pertaining to pricing, capacity, and service;
Our ability to manage and implement effectively our growth and diversification strategies and cost saving initiatives;
Our dependence on our reputation and the Schneider brand and the potential for adverse publicity, damage to our reputation, and the loss of brand equity;
Risks related to demand for our service offerings;
Risks associated with the loss of a significant customer or customers;
Capital investments that fail to match customer demand or for which we cannot obtain adequate funding;
Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel, the volume and terms of diesel fuel purchase commitments, and our ability to recover fuel costs through our fuel surcharge programs;
Our ability to attract and retain qualified drivers includingand owner-operators;
Our use ofreliance on owner-operators to provide a portion of our truck fleet;
Our dependence on railroads in the operation of our intermodal business;
Service instability from third-party capacity providers used by our logistics brokerage business;
Changes in the outsourcing practices of our third-party logistics customers;
Difficulty in obtaining material, equipment, goods, and services from our vendors and suppliers;
Our ability to recruit, develop, and retain our key associates;
Labor relations;
Variability in insurance and claims expenses and the risks of insuring claims through our captive insurance company;
The impact of laws and regulations that apply to our business, including those that relate to the environment, taxes, employees, owner-operators, and our captive insurance company; changes to those laws and regulations; and the increased costs of compliance with existing or future federal, state, and local regulations;
Political, economic, and other risks from cross-border operations and operations in multiple countries;
Risks associated with financial, credit, and equity markets, including our ability to service indebtedness and fund capital expenditures and strategic initiatives;
Negative seasonal patterns generally experienced in the trucking industry during traditionally slower shipping periods and winter months;
Risks associated with severe weather and similar events;
Significant systems disruptions, including those caused by cybersecurity events;
The potential that we will not successfully identify, negotiate, consummate, or integrate acquisitions;
Exposure to claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of our business;
Our ability to adapt to new technologies and new participants in the truckload and transportation industry; and
Those risks and uncertainties discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, as such may be amended or supplemented in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this report or other Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed after such Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as those discussed in our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and the other information appearing elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the SEC.
We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this report to reflect actual results or future events or circumstances. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
OPERATING REVENUES | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: | | | | | | | |
Purchased transportation | 521.1 |
| | 403.9 |
| | 1,431.8 |
| | 1,158.7 |
|
Salaries, wages, and benefits | 317.2 |
| | 307.4 |
| | 943.2 |
| | 910.0 |
|
Fuel and fuel taxes | 87.4 |
| | 76.3 |
| | 260.3 |
| | 220.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 73.3 |
| | 70.5 |
| | 216.9 |
| | 207.0 |
|
Operating supplies and expenses | 123.5 |
| | 135.3 |
| | 364.2 |
| | 369.2 |
|
Insurance and related expenses | 24.1 |
| | 22.2 |
| | 69.4 |
| | 64.3 |
|
Other general expenses, net | 35.6 |
| | 31.1 |
| | 112.4 |
| | 75.9 |
|
Total operating expenses | 1,182.2 |
| | 1,046.7 |
| | 3,398.2 |
| | 3,005.8 |
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | 97.9 |
| | 64.1 |
| | 257.2 |
| | 186.6 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): | | | | | | | |
Interest expense—net | 2.7 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 10.1 |
| | 13.7 |
|
Other income—net | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
Total other expense—net | 2.6 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 13.4 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 95.3 |
| | 60.7 |
| | 248.1 |
| | 173.2 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | 24.6 |
| | 23.8 |
| | 64.0 |
| | 67.2 |
|
NET INCOME | $ | 70.7 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 184.1 |
| | $ | 106.0 |
|
| | | | | | | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (0.9 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities—net of tax | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 0.2 |
|
Total other comprehensive loss | (0.9 | ) | | — |
| | (1.1 | ) | | (0.5 | ) |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | $ | 69.8 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 183.0 |
| | $ | 105.5 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 177.0 |
| | 176.9 |
| | 177.0 |
| | 169.2 |
|
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 177.2 |
| | 177.0 |
| | 177.2 |
| | 169.3 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
Dividends per share of common stock | $ | 0.06 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.18 |
| | $ | 0.15 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
| | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
Operating expenses: | | | | | | | |
Purchased transportation | 503.8 |
| | 485.7 |
| | 977.1 |
| | 910.7 |
|
Salaries, wages, and benefits | 286.3 |
| | 314.7 |
| | 599.3 |
| | 626.0 |
|
Fuel and fuel taxes | 76.2 |
| | 88.2 |
| | 151.0 |
| | 172.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 74.9 |
| | 71.9 |
| | 148.3 |
| | 143.6 |
|
Operating supplies and expenses | 134.1 |
| | 121.6 |
| | 279.2 |
| | 240.7 |
|
Insurance and related expenses | 25.4 |
| | 22.2 |
| | 53.6 |
| | 45.3 |
|
Other general expenses | 28.2 |
| | 40.3 |
| | 63.0 |
| | 76.8 |
|
Goodwill impairment charge | 34.6 |
| | — |
| | 34.6 |
| | — |
|
Total operating expenses | 1,163.5 |
| | 1,144.6 |
| | 2,306.1 |
| | 2,216.0 |
|
Income from operations | 49.2 |
| | 91.7 |
| | 100.7 |
| | 159.3 |
|
Other expenses (income): | | | | | | | |
Interest income | (2.4 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | (4.6 | ) | | (1.4 | ) |
Interest expense | 5.4 |
| | 4.6 |
| | 9.3 |
| | 8.8 |
|
Other expenses (income)—net | 0.3 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | (0.9 | ) |
Total other expense | 3.3 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 5.4 |
| | 6.5 |
|
Income before income taxes | 45.9 |
| | 88.3 |
| | 95.3 |
| | 152.8 |
|
Provision for income taxes | 11.4 |
| | 22.5 |
| | 23.9 |
| | 39.4 |
|
Net income | 34.5 |
| | 65.8 |
| | 71.4 |
| | 113.4 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (0.2 | ) | | 0.5 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Unrealized income (loss) on marketable securities—net of tax | 0.3 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | (0.3 | ) |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 0.1 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.8 |
| | (0.2 | ) |
Comprehensive income | $ | 34.6 |
| | $ | 66.2 |
| | $ | 72.2 |
| | $ | 113.2 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 177.1 |
| | 177.0 |
| | 177.1 |
| | 177.0 |
|
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding | 177.4 |
| | 177.2 |
| | 177.4 |
| | 177.2 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(in millions, except share data)
| | | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | June 30, | | December 31, |
ASSETS | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
Assets | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 359.8 |
| | $ | 238.5 |
| $ | 377.7 |
| | $ | 378.7 |
|
Marketable securities | 45.0 |
| | 41.6 |
| 47.5 |
| | 51.3 |
|
Trade accounts receivable—net of allowance of $6.6 and $5.2, respectively | 588.7 |
| | 527.9 |
| |
Trade accounts receivable—net of allowance of $6.6 million and $6.8 million, respectively | | 525.0 |
| | 593.1 |
|
Other receivables | 20.1 |
| | 22.4 |
| 151.2 |
| | 31.8 |
|
Current portion of lease receivables—net of allowance of $0.5 and $1.7, respectively | 130.5 |
| | 104.9 |
| |
Current portion of lease receivables—net of allowance of $0.5 million | | 122.9 |
| | 129.1 |
|
Inventories | 60.9 |
| | 83.1 |
| 57.6 |
| | 60.8 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 96.6 |
| | 75.6 |
| 147.0 |
| | 79.5 |
|
Total current assets | 1,301.6 |
| | 1,094.0 |
| 1,428.9 |
| | 1,324.3 |
|
NONCURRENT ASSETS: | | | | |
Noncurrent Assets: | | | | |
Property and equipment: | | | | | | |
Transportation equipment | 2,885.4 |
| | 2,770.1 |
| 2,990.5 |
| | 2,900.2 |
|
Land, buildings, and improvements | 175.2 |
| | 183.8 |
| 182.0 |
| | 177.2 |
|
Other property and equipment | 157.2 |
| | 175.7 |
| 162.0 |
| | 157.6 |
|
Total property and equipment | 3,217.8 |
| | 3,129.6 |
| 3,334.5 |
| | 3,235.0 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | 1,300.2 |
| | 1,271.5 |
| 1,318.9 |
| | 1,312.8 |
|
Net property and equipment | 1,917.6 |
| | 1,858.1 |
| 2,015.6 |
| | 1,922.2 |
|
Lease receivables | 130.7 |
| | 138.9 |
| 133.7 |
| | 133.2 |
|
Capitalized software and other noncurrent assets | 79.8 |
| | 74.7 |
| 186.9 |
| | 82.6 |
|
Goodwill | 164.2 |
| | 164.8 |
| 127.6 |
| | 162.2 |
|
Total noncurrent assets | 2,292.3 |
| | 2,236.5 |
| 2,463.8 |
| | 2,300.2 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 3,593.9 |
| | $ | 3,330.5 |
| |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 3,892.7 |
| | $ | 3,624.5 |
|
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | |
Trade accounts payable | $ | 293.0 |
| | $ | 230.4 |
| $ | 268.0 |
| | $ | 226.0 |
|
Accrued salaries and wages | 85.0 |
| | 85.8 |
| |
Accrued salaries, wages, and benefits | | 67.6 |
| | 94.8 |
|
Claims accruals—current | 64.4 |
| | 48.3 |
| 195.9 |
| | 58.3 |
|
Current maturities of debt and capital lease obligations | 10.1 |
| | 19.1 |
| |
Current maturities of debt and finance lease obligations | | 73.6 |
| | 51.7 |
|
Dividends payable | 10.7 |
| | 8.8 |
| 11.0 |
| | 10.6 |
|
Other current liabilities | 93.8 |
| | 69.6 |
| 105.8 |
| | 81.2 |
|
Total current liabilities | 557.0 |
| | 462.0 |
| 721.9 |
| | 522.6 |
|
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | |
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 412.5 |
| | 420.6 |
| |
Noncurrent Liabilities: | | | | |
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations | | 334.5 |
| | 359.6 |
|
Claims accruals—noncurrent | 98.6 |
| | 102.5 |
| 101.6 |
| | 113.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 423.3 |
| | 386.6 |
| 448.9 |
| | 450.6 |
|
Other | 49.3 |
| | 68.6 |
| 100.4 |
| | 46.1 |
|
Total noncurrent liabilities | 983.7 |
| | 978.3 |
| 985.4 |
| | 969.6 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11) | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | 1,707.3 |
| | 1,492.2 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11) | | | | |
Shareholders' Equity: | | | | |
Class A common shares, no par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized, 83,029,500 shares issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
|
Class B common shares, no par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized, 94,607,116 and 93,850,011 shares issued, and 93,967,681 and 93,850,011 shares outstanding, respectively | — |
| | — |
| |
Class B common shares, no par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized, 94,804,861 and 94,593,588 shares issued, and 94,081,867 and 93,969,268 shares outstanding, respectively | | — |
| | — |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 1,539.3 |
| | 1,534.6 |
| 1,546.6 |
| | 1,544.0 |
|
Retained earnings | 515.0 |
| | 355.6 |
| 639.0 |
| | 589.3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income | (1.1 | ) | | — |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (0.2 | ) | | (1.0 | ) |
Total shareholders' equity | 2,053.2 |
| | 1,890.2 |
| 2,185.4 |
| | 2,132.3 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 3,593.9 |
| | $ | 3,330.5 |
| |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | $ | 3,892.7 |
| | $ | 3,624.5 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(in millions)
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Operating Activities: | | | | |
Net income | $ | 184.1 |
| | $ | 106.0 |
| $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 113.4 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 216.9 |
| | 207.0 |
| 148.3 |
| | 143.6 |
|
Goodwill impairment | | 34.6 |
| | — |
|
Gains on sales of property and equipment | (4.2 | ) | | (6.4 | ) | (2.7 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
Proceeds from lease receipts | | 40.1 |
| | — |
|
Deferred income taxes | 34.4 |
| | 48.8 |
| (1.9 | ) | | 27.7 |
|
WSL contingent consideration adjustment | — |
| | (13.2 | ) | |
Long-term incentive compensation expense | 15.3 |
| | 15.3 |
| |
Long-term incentive and share-based compensation expense | | 6.0 |
| | 10.4 |
|
Other noncash items | (3.1 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | 1.8 |
| | (3.2 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | |
Receivables | (65.7 | ) | | (39.0 | ) | 66.2 |
| | (38.9 | ) |
Other assets | (15.9 | ) | | (9.5 | ) | (38.7 | ) | | (17.9 | ) |
Payables | 35.6 |
| | 22.1 |
| (2.5 | ) | | 36.9 |
|
Claims reserves and other receivables, net | | 3.9 |
| | 11.1 |
|
Other liabilities | 12.7 |
| | (14.9 | ) | (24.5 | ) | | (26.4 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 410.1 |
| | 315.7 |
| 302.0 |
| | 255.0 |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Investing Activities: | | | | |
Purchases of transportation equipment | (268.1 | ) | | (274.1 | ) | (231.4 | ) | | (143.1 | ) |
Purchases of other property and equipment | (22.3 | ) | | (27.3 | ) | (25.7 | ) | | (14.4 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 74.6 |
| | 51.8 |
| 26.0 |
| | 47.6 |
|
Proceeds from lease receipts and sale of off-lease inventory | 56.2 |
| | 42.4 |
| |
Proceeds from lease receipts | | — |
| | 29.0 |
|
Proceeds from sale of off-lease inventory | | 10.0 |
| | 7.8 |
|
Purchases of lease equipment | (58.4 | ) | | (89.8 | ) | (42.9 | ) | | (34.7 | ) |
Sales of marketable securities | 3.9 |
| | 8.4 |
| 11.0 |
| | 1.9 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities | (8.0 | ) | | — |
| (6.4 | ) | | — |
|
Advance funding of dividends to transfer agent | — |
| | (6.7 | ) | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (222.1 | ) | | (295.3 | ) | (259.4 | ) | | (105.9 | ) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Payments under revolving credit agreements | — |
| | (135.0 | ) | |
Payments of debt and capital lease obligations | (17.3 | ) | | (118.5 | ) | |
Financing Activities: | | | | |
Payments of debt and finance lease obligations | | (3.6 | ) | | (15.1 | ) |
Payments of deferred consideration related to acquisition | (19.3 | ) | | (19.4 | ) | (18.7 | ) | | (19.3 | ) |
Proceeds from IPO, net of issuance costs | — |
| | 340.6 |
| |
Dividends paid | (30.1 | ) | | (16.6 | ) | (21.3 | ) | | (19.5 | ) |
Redemptions of redeemable common shares | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (66.7 | ) | | 51.0 |
| |
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 121.3 |
| | 71.4 |
| |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (43.6 | ) | | (53.9 | ) |
| | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | (1.0 | ) | | 95.2 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: | | | | |
Beginning of period | 238.5 |
| | 130.8 |
| 378.7 |
| | 238.5 |
|
End of period | $ | 359.8 |
| | $ | 202.2 |
| $ | 377.7 |
| | $ | 333.7 |
|
ADDITIONAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | |
Additional Cash Flow Information: | | | | |
Noncash investing and financing activity: | | | | | | |
Equipment purchases in accounts payable | $ | 36.5 |
| | $ | 57.4 |
| $ | 46.7 |
| | $ | 31.5 |
|
Dividends declared but not yet paid | 10.7 |
| | 8.8 |
| 11.0 |
| | 10.7 |
|
Ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. | 2.5 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 2.5 |
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for: | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | |
Interest | $ | 13.2 |
| | $ | 16.6 |
| 7.3 |
| | 7.8 |
|
Income taxes—net of refunds | 25.5 |
| | (10.4 | ) | 20.5 |
| | 19.7 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total |
|
| Balance—December 31, 2017 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,534.6 |
| | $ | 355.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,890.2 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | 47.6 |
| | — |
| | 47.6 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) |
| Share-based compensation expense | | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Dividends declared at $0.06 per share of Class A and Class B common shares | | — |
| | — |
| | (10.7 | ) | | — |
| | (10.7 | ) |
| Share issuances | | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Shares withheld for employee taxes | | — |
| | (1.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1.8 | ) |
| Cumulative-effect adjustment of ASU 2014-09 adoption | | — |
| | — |
| | 7.3 |
| | — |
| | 7.3 |
|
| Other | | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Balance—March 31, 2018 | | — |
| | 1,535.2 |
| | 399.8 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | 1,934.4 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | 65.8 |
| | — |
| | 65.8 |
|
| Other comprehensive gain | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | | — |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.1 |
|
| Dividends declared at $0.06 per share of Class A and Class B common shares | | — |
| | — |
| | (10.5 | ) | | — |
| | (10.5 | ) |
| Share issuances | | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Shares withheld for employee taxes | | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Exercise of employee stock options | |
|
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Other | | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Balance—June 30, 2018 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,537.6 |
| | $ | 455.1 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 1,992.5 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance—December 31, 2018 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,544.0 |
| | $ | 589.3 |
| | $ | (1.0 | ) | | $ | 2,132.3 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | 36.9 |
| | — |
| | 36.9 |
|
| Other comprehensive gain | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | | — |
| | 2.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Dividends declared at $0.06 per share of Class A and Class B common shares
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10.7 | ) | | — |
| | (10.7 | ) |
| Shares withheld for employee taxes | | — |
| | (1.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1.2 | ) |
| Balance—March 31, 2019 | | — |
| | 1,544.8 |
| | 615.5 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 2,160.0 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | 34.5 |
| | — |
| | 34.5 |
|
| Other comprehensive gain | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | | — |
| | 1.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Dividends declared at $0.06 per share of Class A and Class B common shares
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.0 | ) | | — |
| | (11.0 | ) |
| Share issuances | | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Balance—June 30, 2019 | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,546.6 |
| | $ | 639.0 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 2,185.4 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 20182019
1. GENERAL
Description of Business
In this report, when we refer to “the Company,” “us,” “we,” “our,” “ours,” or “ours,“Schneider,” we are referring to Schneider National, Inc. and its subsidiaries. We are a leading transportation services organization headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin. We provide a broad portfolio of premier truckload, intermodal, and logistics solutions and operate one of the largest trucking fleets in North America.
Our IPO of shares of Class B Common Stock was completed in early April 2017, and additional shares were sold in May 2017 under an option granted to the underwriters. In connection with the offering, we sold a total of 20,145,000 shares of Class B common stock at $19 per share and received proceeds of $382.7 million. Expenses related to the offering totaled approximately $42.1 million, resulting in net proceeds of $340.6 million.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements and footnotes do not include all disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. Financial results for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.
All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, these statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of our financial results for the interim periods presented.
Accounting Standards Issued but Not Yet Adopted
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the capitalization requirements for implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the existing capitalization requirements for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. ASU 2018-15 is effective for us as of January 1, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.statements and do not believe the impact will be material. We expect to adopt this standard on a prospective basis.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement - Disclosure Requirements, which removes, modifies, and adds certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. These changes include removing the disclosure requirements related to the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and adding disclosure requirements about the range and weighted-average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Additionally, the amendments remove the phrase “at a minimum” from the codification clarifying that materiality should be considered when evaluating disclosure requirements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for us January 1, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impactdo not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statementsdisclosures and do not believe the impact will be material.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income, which discusses the reclassification of certain tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance requires companies to disclose a description of their accounting policy for releasing income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income and whether they elect to reclassify the stranded income tax effects from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, along with information about other income tax effects that are reclassified. ASU 2018-02 is effective for us January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. We plan to early adopt this ASUstandard during the fourth quarter of 2018 and expect the reclassification of stranded income tax effects to have an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements.2019.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which requires companies to use a forward-looking, expected loss model to estimate credit losses on various types of financial assets and net investments in leases. It also requires additional disclosuredisclosures related to credit quality of trade and other receivables, including information related to management’s estimate of credit allowances. In November 2018, this was further updated with the issuance of ASU 2018-19, which excludes receivables from operating leases from the scope. ASU 2016-13 is effective for us January 1, 2020. We currently cannot reasonably estimate the impact the adoption of this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issuedWe adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases, whichamended authoritative guidance on leases and is codified in ASC 842. The amended guidance requires lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets842, as right-of-use assets along with corresponding lease liabilities. The new standard also requires new disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. This guidance is effective for us January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. In July 2018,using the FASB issued additionaloptional transition method. The FASB’s authoritative guidance providingprovided companies with the option to apply this ASU to new and existing leases within the scope of the guidance as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We plan to electelected this transition method of applying the new lease standard and will recognizehave recognized right-of-use assets and lease liabilities and any cumulative-effect adjustments to the opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2019. Prior period amounts willwere not be adjusted and will continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. Upon adoption
Adoption of the new standard resulted in the initial recording of right-of-use lease assets and related lease liabilities of $80.6 million and $85.2 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2019, right-of-use lease assets and related lease liabilities were $92.4 million and $97.0 million, respectively. Operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on January 1, 2019,the present value of the future lease payments over the term. Schneider's incremental borrowing rates are used as the discount rates for leases and are determined based on U. S. Treasury rates plus an applicable margin to arrive at all-in rates. Schneider uses multiple discount rates based on lease terms and other economic factors. The operating lease right-of-use asset also includes accrued lease expense resulting from the straight-line accounting under prior accounting methods, which is now being amortized over the remaining life of the lease.
In addition, we expect to electelected the package of practical expedients provided under the guidance. The practical expedient package applies to leases that commenced prior to adoption of the new standard and permits companies not to reassess whether existing or expired contracts are or contain a lease, the lease classification, and any initial direct costs for any existing leases. We have createdalso elected the practical expedient related to land easements, allowing us to carry forward the accounting treatment of our existing agreements for land easements, none of which were material as of January 1, 2019.
As lessee
We lease real estate, transportation equipment, and office equipment under operating and finance leases. Our real estate operating leases include operating centers, distribution warehouses, offices, and drop yards. Our finance leases relate almost entirely to transportation equipment. A majority of our leases include an option to extend the lease, and a cross-functional implementation team whose effortssmall number of our leases include an option to date consist of identifyingearly terminate the Company's lease, population, selectingwhich may include a termination payment. If we are reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend a lease, software thatthe extension period is included as part of the right-of-use asset and lease liability.
For our real estate leases, we have elected to apply the recognition requirement to leases of twelve months or less, therefore, an operating lease right-of-use asset and liability will assistbe recognized for all these leases. For our equipment leases, we have elected to not apply the recognition requirements to leases of twelve months or less. These leases will be expensed on a straight-line basis and no operating lease right-of-use asset or liability will be recorded.
We have also elected to not separate the different components within the contract for our leases; therefore, all fixed costs associated with the reportinglease are included in the right-of-use asset and disclosure requirementsthe operating lease liability. This often relates to the requirement for us to pay a proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance, and other operating costs in addition to a base or fixed rent. Some of our leases have variable payment amounts, and the variable portions of those payments are excluded from the right-of-use asset and the lease liability.
At the inception of our contracts we determine if the contract is or contains a lease. A contract is or contains a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
A small number of our leased real estate assets contains subleases. The lease income related to subleases is shown in the lease cost table below.
Certain equipment leases contain residual value guarantees. These are guarantees made to the lessor that the value of the underlying asset returned to the lessor at the end of the lease will be at least a specified amount.
None of our leases contain restrictions or covenants that restrict us from incurring other financial obligations.
The following table presents our net lease costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial Statement Classification | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | | 2019 | | 2019 |
Operating lease cost | | | | | | |
Operating lease cost | | Operating supplies and expenses
| | $ | 8.9 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
|
Short-term lease cost (1) | | Operating supplies and expenses
| | 1.7 |
| | 3.5 |
|
Finance lease cost | | | | | | |
Amortization of right-of-use assets | | Depreciation and amortization
| | 0.8 |
| | 1.6 |
|
Interest on lease liabilities | | Interest expense
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
|
Variable lease cost | | Operating supplies and expenses
| | 0.7 |
| | 1.4 |
|
Sublease income | | Operating revenues
| | (1.3 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
Total net lease cost | | | | $ | 10.9 |
| | $ | 21.9 |
|
(1) Includes short-term lease costs for leases twelve months or less, including those with a duration of one month or less.
As of June 30, 2019, remaining lease terms and discount rates under the standard,operating and abstractingfinance leases were as follows:
|
| | | |
| | June 30, 2019 |
Weighted-average remaining lease term | | |
Operating leases | | 4.8 years |
|
Finance leases | | 0.6 years |
|
| | |
Weighted-average discount rate | | |
Operating leases | | 4.2 | % |
Finance leases | | 3.8 | % |
Other information related to our leases is as follows: |
| | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | | |
Operating cash flows from operating leases | | $ | 17.7 |
|
Operating cash flows from finance leases | | 0.1 |
|
Financing cash flows from finance leases | | 1.3 |
|
| | |
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities | | |
Operating leases | | $ | 28.7 |
|
Finance leases | | — |
|
Operating lease right-of-use assets, current operating lease liabilities, and validating ournoncurrent operating lease information. As we continue to evaluate this standard, we anticipate it will have a material impact on ourliabilities are included in capitalized software and other noncurrent assets, other current liabilities, and other, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets duesheet as of June 30, 2019.
At June 30, 2019, future lease payments under operating and finance leases were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases |
Remaining 2019 | | $ | 17.0 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
|
2020 | | 27.1 |
| | 0.4 |
|
2021 | | 19.5 |
| | — |
|
2022 | | 13.4 |
| | — |
|
2023 | | 10.7 |
| | — |
|
2024 and thereafter | | 19.3 |
| | — |
|
Total | | 107.0 |
| | 6.0 |
|
Amount representing interest | | (10.0 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
Present value of lease payments | | 97.0 |
| | 5.9 |
|
Current maturities | | (28.4 | ) | | (5.9 | ) |
Long-term lease obligations | | $ | 68.6 |
| | $ | — |
|
For certain of our real estate leases, there are options contained within the lease agreement to extend beyond the capitalization ofinitial lease term. The Company recognizes options as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities associated with our currentwhen deemed reasonably certain to be exercised. Future operating lease payments at June 30, 2019 include $20.8 million related to options to extend lease terms that we are reasonably certain to exercise.
Under ASC 840, future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | Operating Leases | | Capital Leases |
2019 | | $ | 35.8 |
| | $ | 6.9 |
|
2020 | | 25.7 |
| | 0.2 |
|
2021 | | 14.9 |
| | — |
|
2022 | | 8.4 |
| | — |
|
2023 | | 6.8 |
| | — |
|
2024 and thereafter | | 12.7 |
| | — |
|
Total | | $ | 104.3 |
| | 7.1 |
|
Amount representing interest | | | | (0.2 | ) |
Present value of minimum lease payments | | | | 6.9 |
|
Current maturities | | | | (6.7 | ) |
Long-term capital lease obligations | | | | $ | 0.2 |
|
As of June 30, 2019, we had additional operating leases that had not yet commenced of $0.9 million. These leases will commence during the remainder of 2019 and have lease terms of four months to three years.
The consolidated balance sheets include right-of-use assets acquired under finance leases as components of property and equipment as of June 30, 2019 and January 1, 2019, as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | June 30, 2019 | | January 1, 2019 |
Transportation equipment | | $ | 19.9 |
| | $ | 19.9 |
|
Real property | | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
|
Other property | | 1.5 |
| | 0.6 |
|
Accumulated amortization | | (12.7 | ) | | (11.2 | ) |
Total | | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | 10.1 |
|
Transportation equipment is being amortized to the estimated residual value by the end of the lease. Real and other property under finance leases are being amortized to a zero net book value over the initial lease term.
As lessor
We finance various types of transportation-related equipment for independent third parties under lease contracts which are generally for one year to five years and are accounted for as sales-type leases with fully guaranteed residual values. At the inception of the contracts, we determine if the contract is or contains a lease. A contract is or contains a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
With the adoption of ASC 842, all leases for which we are the lessee.lessor meet the definition of sales-type leases. In addition, as required under ASC 842, all cash flows from lease receipts are classified as operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows beginning January 1, 2019. We dopreviously presented all cash flows from lease receipts as investing activities.
As of June 30, 2019 and January 1, 2019, the investment in lease receivables was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2019 | | January 1, 2019 |
Future minimum payments to be received on leases | | $ | 145.0 |
| | $ | 140.0 |
|
Guaranteed residual lease values | | 143.8 |
| | 151.0 |
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received | | 288.8 |
| | 291.0 |
|
Unearned income | | (32.2 | ) | | (28.7 | ) |
Net investment in leases | | 256.6 |
| | 262.3 |
|
| | | | |
Current maturities of lease receivables | | 123.4 |
| | 129.6 |
|
Less—allowance for doubtful accounts | | (0.5 | ) | | (0.5 | ) |
Current portion of lease receivables—net of allowance | | 122.9 |
| | 129.1 |
|
| | | | |
Lease receivables—noncurrent | | $ | 133.7 |
| | $ | 133.2 |
|
The amounts to be received on lease receivables as of June 30, 2019 were as follows:
|
| | | | |
(in millions) | | June 30, 2019 |
Remaining 2019 | | $ | 74.4 |
|
2020 | | 133.2 |
|
2021 | | 63.6 |
|
2022 | | 17.4 |
|
2023 | | 0.2 |
|
2024 and thereafter | | — |
|
Total undiscounted lease cash flows | | 288.8 |
|
Amount representing interest | | (32.2 | ) |
Present value of lease receivables | | 256.6 |
|
Current lease receivables, net of allowance | | (122.9 | ) |
Long-term lease receivable | | $ | 133.7 |
|
Leases are generally placed on nonaccrual status (nonaccrual of interest and other fees) when a payment becomes 90 days past due or upon receipt of notification of bankruptcy, upon the death of a customer, or in other instances in which management concludes collectability is not believe it will have a material impact on ourreasonably assured. The accrual of interest and other fees is resumed when all payments are less than 60 days past due. At June 30, 2019, there were $0.3 million of lease payments greater than 90 days past due. The terms of the lease agreements generally give us the ability to take possession of the underlying asset in the event of default. We may incur credit losses in excess of recorded allowances if the full amount of any anticipated proceeds from the sale or re-lease of the asset supporting the third party’s financial obligation is not realized. Repossession and estimated reconditioning costs are recorded in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income or cash flows. Leasing activities in which we are the lessor in the transaction areperiod incurred.
Our lease payments primarily include base rentals and guaranteed residual values. In addition, we also subjectcollect one-time administrative fees and heavy vehicle use tax on our leases. We have elected to ASC 842. not separate the different components within the contract as the administrative fees were not material for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. We have also elected to
exclude all taxes assessed by a governmental authority from the consideration (e.g., heavy vehicle use tax). All of our leases require fixed payments, therefore we have no variable payment provisions.
Our evaluationleases contain an option for the lessee to return, extend, or purchase the equipment at the end of the impactlease term for the guaranteed contract residual amount. This is estimated to approximate the fair value of this standardthe equipment. Equipment is leased under sales-type leases where the lessees guarantee the residual value of the equipment. The table below provides additional information on our lessor activity is ongoing, however from a lessor perspective, we do not believe the standard will have a material impactsales-type leases.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2019 |
Revenue | | $ | 52.7 |
| | $ | 108.9 |
|
Cost of goods sold | | (47.3 | ) | | (97.2 | ) |
Operating profit | | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 11.7 |
|
| | | | |
Interest income on lease receivable | | $ | 6.8 |
| | $ | 13.4 |
|
Initial direct cost incurred | | — |
| | — |
|
The amounts to be received on our consolidated balance sheets, statementslease receivables as of comprehensive income, or cash flows.December 31, 2018 under ASC 840 were as follows:
|
| | | | |
(in millions) | | December 31, 2018 |
2019 | | $ | 149.0 |
|
2020 | | 112.7 |
|
2021 | | 29.0 |
|
2022 | | 0.3 |
|
2023 | | — |
|
2024 and thereafter | | — |
|
Total | | $ | 291.0 |
|
2.3. REVENUE RECOGNITION
We implemented ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which is codified as ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 and replaces ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. We used the modified retrospective approach for adoption, which required us to record the cumulative effect of the transition through retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Retained earnings increased by $7.3 million upon adoption. The adjustment related only to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The following table shows the amount by which financial statement lines were affected by the adoption of the new standard. The changes relate to the recognition of transportation revenue over time rather than at delivery, as explained below under the Transportation heading.Disaggregated Revenues
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
Financial Statement Line Item (in millions) | | Under ASC 605 | | Adjustment | | As Reported |
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 1,273.1 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
| | $ | 1,280.1 |
|
Purchased transportation | | 517.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 521.1 |
|
Salaries, wages, and benefits | | 318.2 |
| | (1.0 | ) | | 317.2 |
|
Total operating expenses | | 1,179.4 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 1,182.2 |
|
Income from operations | | 93.7 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 97.9 |
|
Provision for income taxes | | 23.4 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 24.6 |
|
Net income | | 67.7 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 70.7 |
|
Comprehensive income | | 66.8 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 69.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
Financial Statement Line Item (in millions) | | Under ASC 605 | | Adjustment | | As Reported |
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 3,642.9 |
| | $ | 12.5 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
|
Purchased transportation | | 1,424.2 |
| | 7.6 |
| | 1,431.8 |
|
Salaries, wages, and benefits | | 943.0 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 943.2 |
|
Total operating expenses | | 3,390.4 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 3,398.2 |
|
Income from operations | | 252.5 |
| | 4.7 |
| | 257.2 |
|
Provision for income taxes | | 62.7 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 64.0 |
|
Net income | | 180.7 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 184.1 |
|
Comprehensive income | | 179.6 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 183.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2018 |
Financial Statement Line Item (in millions) | | Under ASC 605 | | Adjustment | | As Reported |
Consolidated Balance Sheet | | | | | | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 64.9 |
| | $ | 31.7 |
| | $ | 96.6 |
|
Total current assets | | 1,269.9 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 1,301.6 |
|
Total assets | | 3,562.2 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 3,593.9 |
|
Other current liabilities | | 75.2 |
| | 18.6 |
| | 93.8 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 538.4 |
| | 18.6 |
| | 557.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 420.9 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 423.3 |
|
Total noncurrent liabilities | | 981.3 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 983.7 |
|
Retained earnings | | 504.3 |
| | 10.7 |
| | 515.0 |
|
Total shareholders' equity | | 2,042.5 |
| | 10.7 |
| | 2,053.2 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | 3,562.2 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 3,593.9 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
Financial Statement Line Item (in millions) | | Under ASC 605 | | Adjustment | | As Reported |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | | | | | | |
Operating Cash Flows | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 180.7 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 184.1 |
|
Change in: Other assets | | (3.6 | ) | | (12.3 | ) | | (15.9 | ) |
Change in: Payables | | 34.3 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 35.6 |
|
Change in: Other liabilities | | 5.1 |
| | 7.6 |
| | 12.7 |
|
ASC 606 requires us to look at revenue from customers at a contract level to determine the appropriate accounting. As defined by the new standard, a “contract” can range from an individual order to a multi-year agreement with a customer, depending on the specific arrangement. The majority of our revenues are related to transportation and have similar characteristics. The following table breaks downsummarizes our revenues by type of service, and each type of service is further described below. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
Disaggregated Revenues (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Transportation | | $ | 1,126.6 |
| | $ | 1,138.0 |
| | $ | 2,203.9 |
| | $ | 2,187.9 |
|
Logistics management | | 29.7 |
| | 53.9 |
| | 87.8 |
| | 106.0 |
|
Other | | 56.4 |
| | 44.4 |
| | 115.1 |
| | 81.4 |
|
Total operating revenues | | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
| | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Disaggregated Revenues (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Transportation | | $ | 1,175.0 |
| | $ | 1,005.7 |
| | $ | 3,362.9 |
| | $ | 2,921.0 |
|
Logistics management | | 57.7 |
| | 55.8 |
| | 163.7 |
| | 160.6 |
|
Other | | 47.4 |
| | 49.3 |
| | 128.8 |
| | 110.8 |
|
Total operating revenues | | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
|
Transportation
Transportation revenues relate to the Truckload and Intermodal reportable segments, as well as to our Brokeragebrokerage business, which is included in the Logistics reportable segment.
In the Transportation portfolio, our service obligation to customers is satisfied over time. We do not believe there is a significant impact on the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue or cash flows based on the mode of transportation. The economic factors that impact our transportation revenue are generally consistent across these modes given the relatively short termshort-term nature of each contract. For the majority of our transportation business, the “contract with a customer” is identified as an individual order under a negotiated agreement. Some consideration is variable in that a final transaction price is uncertain and is susceptible to factors outside of Schneider's influence, such as the weather or the accumulation of accessorial charges. Pricing information is supplied by the rate schedules that accompany negotiated contracts.
Transportation orders are short-term in nature and generally have terms12
Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recognized revenue from transportation services when we completed our obligation to the customer, upon delivery. In accordance with the new standard, we now recognize revenue over the period transportation services are provided to the customer, including service performed as of the end of the reporting period for loads currently in transit, in order to recognize the value that is transferred to a customer over the course of the transportation service.
We determine revenue in transit using the input method, under which revenue is recognized based on time lapsed from the departure date (start of transportation services) to the arrival date (completion of transportation services). Measurement of revenue in transit requires the application of significant judgment. We calculate the estimated percentage of an order's transit time that is complete at period end, and we apply that percentage of completion to the order's estimated revenue. Revenue recognized in the period ended September 30, 2018 includes amounts related to orders that were partially completed (in transit) in prior periods.
In certain transportation arrangements, an unrelated party contributes a specified service to our customer. For example, we contract with third-party carriers to perform transportation services on behalf of our customers in our Brokerage business, and we use third-party rail carriers in our Intermodal segment. In situations that include the contributions of third parties, we act as principal in the arrangement, and, accordingly, we recognize gross revenues from these transactions.
Logistics Management
Logistics Management revenues relate to our Supply Chain Management and Import/Export Services operating segments, both of which are included in our Logistics reportable segment. Within this portfolio, the key service we provide to the customer is management of freight shipping and/or storage.
The “contracts” in our Logistics Management portfolio are the negotiated agreements, which contain both fixed and variable components. The variability of revenues is driven by volumes and transactions, which are known as of an invoice date. See the Remaining Performance Obligations table below for additional information. Supply Chain Management and Import/Export Services contracts typically have terms that extend beyond one year, and they do not include financing components.
Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recognized revenue under these contracts over time, based on pricing terms within the arrangements. Our recognition model will remain the same under the new standard, as we have elected to use the right to invoice practical expedient, which reflects the fact that a customer obtains the benefit associated with logistics services as they are provided (output method).
In our Supply Chain Management business, we subcontract third parties to perform a portion of the services. We are responsible for ensuring the services are performed and that they are acceptable to the customer, and we are, therefore, considered to be the principal in these arrangements.
Other
Other revenues relate to activities that are out of scope for purposes of ASC 606, including our leasing and captive insurance businesses.
Quantitative Disclosure
The following table provides information related to transactions and expected timing of revenue recognition related to performance obligations that are fixed in nature and relate to contracts with terms greater than one year.
year as of date shown:
|
| | | | |
Remaining Performance Obligations (in millions) | | June 30, 2019 |
Expected to be recognized within one year | | |
Transportation | | $ | 14.6 |
|
Logistics Management | | 10.4 |
|
Expected to be recognized after one year | | |
Transportation | | 1.7 |
|
Logistics Management | | 7.3 |
|
Total | | $ | 34.0 |
|
|
| | | | |
Remaining Performance Obligations (in millions) | | September 30, 2018 |
Expected to be recognized within one year | | |
Transportation | | $ | 8.9 |
|
Logistics Management | | 24.3 |
|
Expected to be recognized after one year | | |
Transportation | | 1.4 |
|
Logistics Management | | 5.0 |
|
Total | | $ | 39.6 |
|
This disclosure does not include revenue related to performance obligations that are part of a contract whose original expected duration is one year or less. In addition, this disclosure does not include expected consideration related to performance obligations for which the Company elects to recognize revenue in the amount it has a right to invoice (e.g., usage-based pricing terms).
The following table provides information related to contract balances associated with our contracts with customers as of the dates shown. |
| | | | | | | | |
Contract Balances (in millions) | | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
Other current assets - Contract assets | | $ | 28.8 |
| | $ | 21.7 |
|
Other current liabilities - Contract liabilities | | — |
| | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Contract Balances (in millions) | | September 30, 2018 | | January 1, 2018 |
Other current assets - Contract assets | | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | 22.2 |
|
Other current liabilities - Contract liabilities | | — |
| | — |
|
We generally receive payment within 40 days of completion of performance obligations. Contract assets in the table above relate to revenue in transitin-transit at the end of the reporting period. Contract liabilities relate to amounts that customers paid in advance of the associated service.
For certain of our contracts, we incur upfront costs to fulfill the master agreement, including driver recruiting and equipment relocation, that are capitalized and amortized over the master contract term, which has been deemed to be the period of benefit. These costs usually relate to dedicated transportation arrangements. The following table presents the amounts capitalized for contract fulfillment costs as of the dates shown.
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Capitalized contract fulfillment costs | | $ | 6.1 |
| | $ | 3.7 |
|
Amortization of capitalized contract fulfillment costs was as shown:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Amortization of contract fulfillment costs | | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
|
Practical Expedients
We elected to use the following practical expedients that are available under ASC 606: (i) not to adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component when we expect, at contract inception, that the period between our transfer of a promised service to a customer and when the customer pays for that service will be one year or less; (ii) to apply the new revenue standard to a portfolio of contracts (or performance obligations) with similar characteristics, as we reasonably expect that the effects on the consolidated financial statements of applying this guidance to the portfolio would not differ materially from applying this guidance to the individual contracts (or performance obligations) within that portfolio; and (iii) to recognize revenue in the Logistics Management portfolio in the amount of consideration to which we have a right to invoice, that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the service completed to date.
3.4. FAIR VALUE
Fair value focuses on the estimated price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability, which is referred to as the exit price. Inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value fall into three broad levels (Levels 1, 2, and 3) as follows:
Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2—Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, for the asset or liability or prices for similar assets and liabilities.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk).
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. All marketable securities were valued based on quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active (Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy). We measure our marketable securities on a recurring, monthly basis. See Note 4, 5, Investments, for information on the fair value of our marketable securities.
In connection with the June 1, 2016 acquisition of WSL, a contingent payment arrangement based on the achievement of specified earnings targets iswas in place for three consecutive 12-month periods after the closing, with the aggregate payment total not to exceed $40.0 million. No payments have beenwere made through September 30, 2018. The fair valueunder the agreement which is now expired, and the balance as of the contingent consideration at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 20172018 was zero. The valuation was based on Level 3 inputs.
Our ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. discussed in Note 4, 5, Investments, was valued based on Level 3 inputs.
There were no transfers between levels for the periods discussed.shown.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments
The recorded value of cash, trade accounts receivable, and trade accounts payable approximates fair value.
The table below presents the carrying value of our debt portfolio along with the fair value of a fixed-rate debt portfolio with similar terms and maturities, which is based on borrowing rates available to us in the applicable year. This valuation used Level 2 inputs.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
(in millions) | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
Fixed-rate debt portfolio | | $ | 402.7 |
| | $ | 412.4 |
| | $ | 405.0 |
| | $ | 398.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
(in millions) | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
Debt portfolio | | $ | 415.4 |
| | $ | 405.2 |
| | $ | 429.8 |
| | $ | 432.4 |
|
4.5. INVESTMENTS
Marketable Securities
Our marketable securities are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value in current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Any unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Our portfolio of securities has maturities ranging from 26 to 7581 months. While our intent is to hold our securities to maturity, sudden changes in the market or to our liquidity needs may cause us to sell certain securities in advance of their maturity date.
Any unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on our consolidated balance sheets, unless we determine that an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. If we determine that an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary, we recognize the loss in earnings. We did not have any other-than-temporary impairments for either of the periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. Cost basis is determined using the specific identification method.
The following table presents the values of our marketable securities as of the dates shown:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
(in millions) | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value |
Zero coupon bonds | | $ | 2.0 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
| | $ | 3.9 |
| | $ | 3.9 |
|
U.S. treasury and government agencies | | 18.9 |
| | 19.0 |
| | 20.0 |
| | 19.8 |
|
Asset-backed securities | | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Corporate debt securities | | 14.1 |
| | 14.4 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 15.0 |
|
State and municipal bonds | | 11.8 |
| | 12.0 |
| | 12.5 |
| | 12.5 |
|
Total marketable securities | | $ | 46.9 |
| | $ | 47.5 |
| | $ | 51.6 |
| | $ | 51.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
(in millions) | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Fair Value |
Zero coupon bonds | | $ | 3.9 |
| | $ | 3.9 |
| | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 3.9 |
|
U.S. treasury and government agencies | | 18.0 |
| | 17.7 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 6.0 |
|
Asset-backed securities | | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
|
Corporate debt securities | | 11.1 |
| | 11.0 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 9.2 |
|
State and municipal bonds | | 12.6 |
| | 12.3 |
| | 22.7 |
| | 22.2 |
|
Total marketable securities | | $ | 45.7 |
| | $ | 45.0 |
| | $ | 41.9 |
| | $ | 41.6 |
|
Gross realized and unrealized gains and losses on sales of marketable securities were not material for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017.2018. Gross unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities were not material for the periods ended June 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018.
Ownership Interest in Platform Science, Inc.
In 2018, we received a 30% ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. in exchange for our contribution of a non-exclusive license for telematics mobile software that was developed to enable driver productivity and ensure regulatory compliance. Our ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. is being accounted for under ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities and is recorded at fair value in other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet.sheets. The fair value of the ownership interest as of December 31, 2018 was initially determined to be $2.5$3.5 million through an independent valuation and is being accounted for under ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities. valuation. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, there have been no transactions that have triggered an indicatorwould indicate that the value of our ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. has changed.
5.6. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of our acquisitions over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | Truckload | | Logistics | | Other | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2018 | | $ | 138.2 |
| | $ | 14.2 |
| | $ | 9.8 |
| | $ | 162.2 |
|
Goodwill impairment charge | | (34.6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (34.6 | ) |
Foreign currency translation | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Balance at June 30, 2019 | | $ | 103.6 |
| | $ | 14.2 |
| | $ | 9.8 |
| | $ | 127.6 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | Truckload | | Logistics | | Other | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2017 | | $ | 138.2 |
| | $ | 14.2 |
| | $ | 12.4 |
| | $ | 164.8 |
|
Foreign currency translation | | — |
| | — |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) |
Balance at September 30, 2018 | | $ | 138.2 |
| | $ | 14.2 |
| | $ | 11.8 |
| | $ | 164.2 |
|
At SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, we had accumulated goodwill impairment charges of $6.0 million.$42.6 million and $8.0 million, respectively.
DuringGoodwill is tested for impairment at least annually using both the seconddiscounted cash flow method and the guideline public company method in calculating the fair values of our reporting units. Key inputs used in the discounted cash flow approach include growth rates for sales and operating profit, perpetuity growth assumptions, and discount rates. As interest rates rise, the calculated fair values of our reporting units will decrease, which could impact the results of our goodwill impairment tests.
A triggering event occurred during the quarter of 2018, we reorganized the structure of the operating segments within the Truckload reportable segment to includeended June 30, 2019 as results from our FTFM as a separate operating segment and integrated the remaining Dedicated activities into the VTL operating segment. Each Truckload operating segment was determinedreporting unit continued to be its own reporting unit dueless than projected, despite sustained investments and operational changes designed to the level at which financial information is available and management's reviewimprove efficiencies. Because of that information. As a result of the reorganization, goodwill within the Truckload reportable segment, which was previously attributable to the Dedicated reporting unit, was reallocated to the VTL and FTFM reporting units on a relative fair value basis. After the reallocation of goodwill,this triggering event, an impairment test was performed for thesethe FTFM reporting units,unit. As a result of the testing performed, an impairment loss of $34.6 million was recorded for our FTFM reporting unit as the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by this reporting unit were not sufficient to recover its carrying value. This represents all of the goodwill related to the FTFM reporting unit. In conjunction with testing goodwill for impairment, the Company tested the other identifiable tangible and intangible assets related to the FTFM reporting unit for impairment. Based on the results of that testing, it was determined that goodwillthere was not impaired as each reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excessno additional impairment of its respective carrying amount.those assets.
The identifiable intangible assets other than goodwill listed below are included in capitalized software and other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheets. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
(in millions) | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Customer lists | | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | 3.9 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
|
Trade names | | 1.4 |
| | 1.4 |
| | — |
| | 1.4 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 0.2 |
|
Total intangible assets | | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 5.3 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 4.7 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
(in millions) | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
Customer lists | | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 7.3 |
| | $ | 10.5 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | 8.0 |
|
Trade names | | 1.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Total intangible assets | | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 4.3 |
| | $ | 7.6 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 8.7 |
|
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively, and $1.1$0.6 million and $0.7 million for each of the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and 2018, and 2017.respectively. Accumulated amortization in the table above includes foreign currency translation related to a customer list.
Estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets is as follows (in millions):follows:
|
| | | | |
(in millions) | | |
Remaining 2019 | | $ | 0.5 |
|
2020 | | 1.0 |
|
2021 | | 1.0 |
|
2022 | | 1.0 |
|
2023 | | 1.0 |
|
2024 and thereafter | | 2.1 |
|
| | $ | 6.6 |
|
|
| | | |
Remaining 2018 | $ | 0.3 |
|
2019 | 1.1 |
|
2020 | 1.0 |
|
2021 | 1.0 |
|
2022 | 1.0 |
|
2023 and thereafter | 3.2 |
|
| $ | 7.6 |
|
6.7. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, debt included the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
Unsecured senior notes: principal payable at maturities ranging from 2019 through 2025; interest payable in semiannual installments through the same timeframe; weighted-average interest rate of 3.36% for both 2019 and 2018 | | $ | 400.0 |
| | $ | 400.0 |
|
Equipment financing notes: principal and interest payable in monthly installments through 2019; weighted average interest rate of 3.98% and 3.72% for 2019 and 2018, respectively | | 2.7 |
| | 5.0 |
|
Total principal outstanding | | 402.7 |
| | 405.0 |
|
Current maturities | | (67.7 | ) | | (45.0 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | | (0.5 | ) | | (0.6 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 334.5 |
| | $ | 359.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Unsecured senior notes: principal payable at maturities ranging from 2019 through 2025; interest payable in semiannual installments through the same timeframe; weighted-average interest rate of 3.36% for both 2018 and 2017 | | $ | 400.0 |
| | $ | 400.0 |
|
Equipment financing notes: principal and interest payable in monthly installments through 2023; weighted average interest rate of 3.79% and 3.76% for 2018 and 2017, respectively | | 15.4 |
| | 29.8 |
|
Total principal outstanding | | 415.4 |
| | 429.8 |
|
Current maturities | | (7.3 | ) | | (15.2 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | | (0.7 | ) | | (0.9 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 407.4 |
| | $ | 413.7 |
|
On August 6, 2018, we entered into a $250.0 millionOur Credit Agreement (the “2018 Credit Facility”) among us, the lenders party thereto (the “Lenders”) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and terminated our priorprovides borrowing capacity of $250.0 million Credit Agreement dated February 18, 2011 (as amended). The 2018 Credit Facility is a revolving credit facility that matures on August 6, 2023 and allows us to request an increase in total commitment by up to $150.0 million, for a total potential commitment of $400.0 million.million through August 2023. The 2018 Credit Facilityagreement also provides a sublimit of $100.0 million to be used for the issuance of letters of credit. The applicable interest rate under the 2018 Credit Facility is based on the Prime Rate, the Federal Funds Rate, or the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR), depending upon the type of borrowing, plus an applicable margin based on our consolidated net debt coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter. We had no outstanding borrowings under these agreementsthis agreement as of SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 or December 31, 2017.2018. Standby letters of credit under these agreementsthis agreement amounted to $3.9 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018 and were primarily related to the requirements of certain of our real estate leases.
On September 5, 2018, we entered intoWe also have a Joinder and Amendment No. 2 to our Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “2018 Receivables Purchase Agreement”) relating to our $200.0 million secured accounts receivable facility. The 2018 Receivables Purchase Agreement has a scheduled maturity date of September 3, 2021,that allows us to borrow funds against qualifying trade receivables at rates based on one-month LIBOR up to $200.0 million and provides for the issuance of standby letters of credit.credit through September 2021. We had no outstanding borrowings under this facility at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 or December 31, 2017.2018. At SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, standby letters of credit under this agreement amounted to $62.8$70.3 million and $63.8$65.3 million, respectively, and were primarily related to the requirements of certain of our insurance obligations.
7. LEASE RECEIVABLES
We finance various types of transportation-related equipment for independent third parties. The transactions are generally for one to five years and are accounted for as sales-type or direct financing leases. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the investment in lease receivables was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Future minimum payments to be received on leases | | $ | 141.5 |
| | $ | 141.2 |
|
Guaranteed residual lease values | | 148.7 |
| | 130.7 |
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received | | 290.2 |
| | 271.9 |
|
Unearned income | | (29.0 | ) | | (28.1 | ) |
Net investment in leases | | 261.2 |
| | 243.8 |
|
| | | | |
Current maturities of lease receivables | | 131.0 |
| | 106.6 |
|
Less—allowance for doubtful accounts | | (0.5 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
Current portion of lease receivables—net of allowance | | 130.5 |
| | 104.9 |
|
| | | | |
Lease receivables—noncurrent | | $ | 130.7 |
| | $ | 138.9 |
|
8. INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was 25.8%24.8% and 39.2%25.5% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively, and 25.8%25.1% and 38.8%25.8% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively. The decrease in the rates was due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017. In determining the quarterly provision for income taxes, we use an estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items. This rate is based on our expected annual income, statutory tax rates, and best estimate of nontaxable and nondeductible items of income and expense.
In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, the amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act represent reasonable estimates based on our analysis to date and are considered to be provisional and subject to revision during 2018. Due to the complex nature of the enacted tax law changes, and their application, certain amounts related to our 2017 tax provision recorded in the financial statements as a result of the Tax Legislation are to be considered "provisional" and subject to revision, as we await additional guidance from income tax authorities. No changes were made to the estimated impacts in the first three quarters of 2018.
9. COMMON EQUITY
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017.2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 34.5 |
| | $ | 65.8 |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 113.4 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | 177.1 |
| | 177.0 |
| | 177.1 |
| | 177.0 |
|
Effect of dilutive restricted share units | | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding | | 177.4 |
| | 177.2 |
| | 177.4 |
| | 177.2 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share | | 0.19 |
| | 0.37 |
| | 0.40 |
| | 0.64 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Net income available to common shareholders | | $ | 70.7 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 184.1 |
| | $ | 106.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares issued and outstanding | | 177.0 |
| | 176.9 |
| | 177.0 |
| | 169.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive restricted share units | | 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Weighted average diluted common shares issued and outstanding | | 177.2 |
| | 177.0 |
| | 177.2 |
| | 169.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share | | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 excluded an immaterial amount of share-based compensation awards that had an anti-dilutive effect.
Subsequent Event - Dividends Declared
In OctoberJuly of 2018,2019, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend for the fourththird fiscal quarter of 20182019 in the amount of $0.06 per share to holders of our Class A and Class B common stock. The dividend is payable to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 14, 2018,September 13, 2019 and is expected to be paid on January 7,October 9, 2019.
10. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
We grant various equity-based awards relating to Class B Common Stock under our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). These awards consist of the following: restricted shares, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance-based restricted shares (“Performance Shares”), performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”), and non-qualified stock options.
The following table summarizesShare-based compensation expense was $0.3 million and $2.1 million for the components of ourthree months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $2.4 million and $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We recognize share-based compensation program expense:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Restricted Shares and RSUs | | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 2.4 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
Pre-IPO Restricted Shares | | 0.2 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 1.6 |
|
Performance Shares and PSUs | | 0.8 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 1.3 |
|
Nonqualified Stock Options | | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.4 |
|
Share-based compensation expense | | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 6.3 |
| | $ | 4.3 |
|
Related tax benefit | | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
|
expense over the awards' vesting period. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, we had $13.7$17.3 million of pre-tax unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding share-based compensation awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.62.7 years.
Restricted Shares and RSUs
Underoption awards. The Company uses its stock price on the Plan,grant date as the majority offair value assigned to the restricted shares, RSUs, performance shares, and RSUs granted in 2017 and 2018 vest ratably over a four-year period, with the first 25% of the grant vesting approximately one year after the date of grant, subject to continued employment through the vesting date or retirement eligibility. Dividend equivalents equal to dividends paid on our common shares during the vesting period are tracked and accumulated for each restricted share and RSU. The dividend equivalents are forfeitable and are distributed to participants in cash consistent with the date the awards vest.
A small portion of the restricted shares relate to a one-time 2018 grant, which vests 50% after a five-year period, with the remaining 50% vesting after a six-year period after the grant date, subject to continued employment through the vesting date. Dividend equivalents equal to dividends paid on our common shares during the vesting period are tracked and accumulated for each restricted share. The dividend equivalents are distributed to participants in cash consistent with the date the awards vest.
|
| | | | | | | |
Restricted Shares and RSUs | | Number of Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit |
Unvested at December 31, 2017 | | 240,016 |
| | $ | 19.00 |
|
Granted | | 229,272 |
| | 26.82 |
|
Vested | | (74,795 | ) | | 19.00 |
|
Forfeited | | (14,370 | ) | | 20.21 |
|
Unvested at September 30, 2018 | | 380,123 |
| | $ | 23.67 |
|
Prior to our IPO, we granted restricted shares of Class B Common Stock. Shares included in the pre-IPO restricted share grants vest ratably over a three-year period. Cash dividends are not paid on the unvested pre-IPO restricted shares, nor do they accumulate during the vesting period.
|
| | | | | | | |
Pre-IPO Restricted Shares | | Number of Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Unvested at December 31, 2017 | | 152,199 |
| | $ | 19.00 |
|
Granted | | — |
| | — |
|
Vested | | (101,643 | ) | | 19.00 |
|
Forfeited | | (5,084 | ) | | 19.00 |
|
Unvested at September 30, 2018 | | 45,472 |
| | $ | 19.00 |
|
Performance Shares and PSUs
PSUs. Performance shares and PSUs include a three-year performance period with vestingare earned based on attainment of threshold performance of earnings and return on capital targets. These awards cliff-vest at the end of the three-year performance period, subject to continued employment through the vesting dateand earnings or retirement eligibility, and payout ranges from 0%-200% for PSUs and from 0%-100% for performance shares. Dividend equivalents equal to dividends paid on our common shares during the vesting period are tracked and accumulated for each award. The dividend equivalents are forfeitable and are distributed to participants in cash consistent with the date the awards vest.net income targets.
|
| | | | | | | |
Performance Shares and PSUs | | Number of Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Unvested at December 31, 2017 | | 391,541 |
| | $ | 19.00 |
|
Granted | | 303,228 |
| | 26.78 |
|
Vested | | — |
| | — |
|
Forfeited | | (45,113 | ) | | 19.00 |
|
Unvested at September 30, 2018 | | 649,656 |
| | $ | 22.63 |
|
Nonqualified Stock Options
The options granted under the Plan have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant and vest ratably over a four-year period, with the first 25% of the grant becoming exercisable approximately one year after the date of grant. The options expire ten years from the date of grant.
|
| | | | | | | |
Nonqualified Stock Options | | Number of Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Unvested at December 31, 2017 | | 229,620 |
| | $ | 6.37 |
|
Granted | | 173,024 |
| | 8.96 |
|
Vested | | (8,410 | ) | | 6.37 |
|
Forfeited | | (25,230 | ) | | 6.37 |
|
Unvested at September 30, 2018 | | 369,004 |
| | $ | 7.59 |
|
Assumptions used in calculating the Black-Scholes value of options granted during 2018 were as follows:
|
| | | | |
Weighted-average Black-Scholes value | | $ | 8.96 |
|
Black-Scholes Assumptions: | | |
Expected term | | 6.25 years |
|
Expected volatility | | 32.2 | % |
Expected dividend yield | | 0.9 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | | 2.8 | % |
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of conducting our business we become involved in certain legal matters and investigations on a number of matters, including liability claims, taxes other than income taxes, contract disputes, employment, and other litigation matters. We accrue for anticipated costs to defend and resolve matters that are probable and estimable. We believe the outcomes of these matters will not have a material impact on our business or our consolidated financial statements.
We record liabilities for claims accruals based on our best estimate of expected losses. The primary claims arising for the Company consist of accident-related claims for personal injury, collision, and comprehensive compensation, in addition to workers' compensation and cargo liability claims. We maintain insurance with licensed insurance carriers above the amounts in which we self-insure. Although it is possible that our claims accruals will change based on future developments, we do not believe these changes will be material to our results of operations considering our insurance coverage and other factors.
At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, our firm commitments to purchase transportation equipment totaled approximately $131.6$69.0 million.
WSL Acquisition
The purchase and sale agreement related to our June 2016 acquisition of WSL included guaranteed payments of $20.0 million to the former owners of WSL on each of the first three anniversary dates of the closing. The liability recorded was discounted between one percent and three percent, based on credit-adjusted discount rates. The initial payment in the amount of $19.7 million, including calculated interest based on the discounted amount recorded, was made in June 2017 and reflected an adjustment for a working capital true-up. The second payment in the amount of $20.0 million was made in June 2018. The present value of the remaining payment was $18.7 million at September 30, 2018, which is recorded in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The representative of the former owners of WSL has claimed that we have not fulfilled certain obligations under the purchase and sale agreement relating to the post-closing operations of the business, amongst other matters, and that, as a result, the former owners are entitled to an accelerated payment of the contingent amount described in Note 3, 4, Fair Value, without regard to whether the specified earnings targets are met. We believe this claim is meritless and have filed an action in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking a declaratory judgment that we have complied with our obligations under the agreement and that no accelerated payment is owed. The representative of the former owners has filed a counterclaim seeking the full amount of the accelerated payment.
12. SEGMENT REPORTING
We have three reportable segments – Truckload, Intermodal, and Logistics – which are based primarily on the services each segment provides.
As of December 31, 2017, our operating segments within the Truckload reportable segment were VTL, Dedicated, and Bulk. During the second quarter of 2018, we reorganized the structure of the Truckload reportable segment, separating FTFM into its own operating segment and moving the remaining business that was previously under the Dedicated operating segment into the VTL operating segment. The Truckload reportable segment now consists of three operating segments (VTL, FTFM, and Bulk) that are aggregated because they have similar economic characteristics and meet the other aggregation criteria described in the accounting guidance for segment reporting.
The chief operating decision maker (CODM) reviews revenues for each operating segment without the inclusion of fuel surcharge revenues. For segment purposes, any fuel surcharge revenues earned are recorded as a reduction of the segment’s fuel expenses. For all operating segments except FTFM, revenue is recognized upon delivery, and in-transit revenue is not reflected in segment results. Income from operations at a segment level reflects the measures presented to the CODM for each segment.
Separate balance sheets are not prepared by segment, and, as a result, assets are not separately identifiable by segment. All transactions between reporting segments are eliminated in consolidation.
The following tables summarize our segment information. Intersegment revenues were immaterial for all segments, with the exception of Other, which includes revenues from insurance premiums charged to other segments for workers’ compensation, auto, and other types of insurance. Intersegment revenues included in Other revenues below were $20.7$22.4 million and $20.5$20.7 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively, and $62.0$46.0 million and $57.9$41.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues by Segment | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Truckload | | $ | 534.9 |
| | $ | 567.6 |
| | $ | 1,066.7 |
| | $ | 1,118.1 |
|
Intermodal | | 259.8 |
| | 231.7 |
| | 497.4 |
| | 433.6 |
|
Logistics | | 227.0 |
| | 250.7 |
| | 470.9 |
| | 471.9 |
|
Other | | 95.8 |
| | 79.0 |
| | 195.7 |
| | 153.1 |
|
Fuel surcharge | | 124.2 |
| | 133.1 |
| | 236.0 |
| | 250.9 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations | | (29.0 | ) | | (25.8 | ) | | (59.9 | ) | | (52.3 | ) |
Operating revenues | | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
| | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Revenues by Segment (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Truckload | | $ | 565.0 |
| | $ | 551.7 |
| | $ | 1,685.0 |
| | $ | 1,616.8 |
|
Intermodal | | 252.1 |
| | 196.0 |
| | 681.0 |
| | 571.4 |
|
Logistics | | 268.7 |
| | 209.1 |
| | 739.2 |
| | 584.7 |
|
Total revenues of reportable segments | | 1,085.8 |
| | 956.8 |
| | 3,105.2 |
| | 2,772.9 |
|
Other | | 91.2 |
| | 85.4 |
| | 248.5 |
| | 214.5 |
|
Fuel surcharge | | 134.9 |
| | 93.9 |
| | 385.8 |
| | 276.8 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations | | (31.8 | ) | | (25.3 | ) | | (84.1 | ) | | (71.8 | ) |
Operating revenues | | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Truckload | | $ | 7.9 |
| | $ | 61.2 |
| | $ | 31.1 |
| | $ | 107.8 |
|
Intermodal | | 30.5 |
| | 32.4 |
| | 50.4 |
| | 54.6 |
|
Logistics | | 9.2 |
| | 10.4 |
| | 19.5 |
| | 18.2 |
|
Other | | 1.6 |
| | (12.3 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (21.3 | ) |
Income from operations | | $ | 49.2 |
| | $ | 91.7 |
| | $ | 100.7 |
| | $ | 159.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Truckload | | $ | 53.1 |
| | $ | 41.1 |
| | $ | 162.8 |
| | $ | 132.9 |
|
Intermodal | | 36.1 |
| | 12.2 |
| | 88.7 |
| | 30.0 |
|
Logistics | | 12.5 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 30.4 |
| | 20.8 |
|
Other | | (3.8 | ) | | 1.7 |
| | (24.7 | ) | | 2.9 |
|
Income from operations | | 97.9 |
| | 64.1 |
| | 257.2 |
| | 186.6 |
|
Other expense—net | | 2.6 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 13.4 |
|
Income before income taxes | | $ | 95.3 |
| | $ | 60.7 |
| | $ | 248.1 |
| | $ | 173.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Depreciation and Amortization Expense by Segment (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Truckload | | $ | 52.6 |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| | $ | 157.3 |
| | $ | 152.7 |
|
Intermodal | | 10.3 |
| | 8.8 |
| | 29.0 |
| | 25.3 |
|
Logistics | | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
|
Other | | 10.3 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 30.3 |
| | 28.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | | $ | 73.3 |
| | $ | 70.5 |
| | $ | 216.9 |
| | $ | 207.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and Amortization Expense by Segment | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Truckload | | $ | 54.9 |
| | $ | 52.2 |
| | $ | 108.3 |
| | $ | 104.7 |
|
Intermodal | | 11.0 |
| | 9.5 |
| | 21.9 |
| | 18.7 |
|
Logistics | | 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.2 |
|
Other | | 8.8 |
| | 10.1 |
| | 17.8 |
| | 20.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | | $ | 74.9 |
| | $ | 71.9 |
| | $ | 148.3 |
| | $ | 143.6 |
|
Substantially all of our revenues and assets were generated or located within the United States.
In 2019, we began recognizing in-transit revenues and related expenses at the reporting segment level for all operating segments to better align revenues and costs within our reporting segments. Prior to 2019, revenues at the operating segment level reflected revenue recognized upon delivery, and in-transit revenue was recorded within Other, except for FTFM. For consistency, we have restated the 2018 revenue and income (loss) from operations by segment in the tables above to reflect this new measure of revenue and segment profit. The tables below reflect the impact of this change by reporting segment on revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) and income (loss) from operations.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) by Segment | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2018 | | 2018 |
Truckload | | $ | (1.1 | ) | | $ | (1.9 | ) |
Intermodal | | 3.8 |
| | 4.7 |
|
Logistics | | 1.0 |
| | 1.4 |
|
Other | | (3.7 | ) | | (4.2 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2018 | | 2018 |
Truckload | | $ | (1.1 | ) | | $ | (1.9 | ) |
Intermodal | | 1.6 |
| | 2.0 |
|
Logistics | | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
|
Other | | (0.7 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 29, 2019 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a structured shut down of its FTFM service offering within its Truckload reporting segment. Schneider expects the shutdown to be substantially complete by December 31, 2019 and expects to incur pre-tax restructuring charges, primarily during that timeframe, of between $50.0 million to $75.0 million. Such restructuring charges include approximately: (i) $35.0 million to $45.0 million of non-cash charges, consisting of impairments of various tangible and intangible assets including equipment, customer lists and other customer related assets, and software; as well as (ii) $15.0 million to $30.0 million of charges that will result in future cash expenditures, consisting primarily of net facility lease obligations and severance costs. All estimates are subject to change until finalized.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.
INTRODUCTION
We are a leading transportation and logistics services company providing a broad portfolio of premier truckload, intermodal, and logistics solutions and operating one of the largest for-hire trucking fleets in North America. Our highly flexible and balanced business combines asset-based truckload services with asset-light intermodal and non-asset logistics offerings, enabling us to serve our customers’ diverse transportation needs. Our broad portfolio of services provides us with a greater opportunity to allocate growth capital within our portfolio of services in a manner designed to maximize returns throughout the seasonalacross all market cycles and economic business cycles. For example, we can efficiently moveconditions. We continually monitor our equipment between servicesperformance and regions when we see opportunitiesmarket conditions to enhanceensure appropriate allocation of capital and resources to grow our return on capital.businesses and to optimize returns across reportable segments. Our Queststrong balance sheet enables us to carry out an acquisition strategy that strengthens our overall portfolio. We are positioned to leverage our scalable platform serves as an instrumental factor in driving profitable growth from both new and existing customers as it enables real-time, data-driven decision supportexperienced operations team to acquire high-quality businesses that meet our disciplined selection criteria to broaden our service offerings and business analysis of every load/order, assisting our associates in proactively serving customer needs while maximizing productivity of our drivers, assets, and related third-party providers.base.
Our truckload services include standard long-haul and regional shipping services final mile “white glove”primarily using dry van equipment, bulk, temperature-controlled, FTFM residential and retail store delivery, and customized solutions for high-value, and time-sensitive loads. These services are executed through either for-hire or dedicated contracts throughout North America.contracts.
Our intermodal service consists of door-to-door container on flat car service by a combination of rail and over-the-road transportation, in association with our rail carrier partners. Our intermodal service offersuses company-owned containers, chassis, and trucks, using primarily company dray drivers to offer vast coverage throughout North America, including cross-border freight utilizing company containers and trucks.cross border.
Our logistics offerings consist of non-asset freight brokerage services, supply chain services (including 3PL), and import/export services. Our logistics business typically provides value-added services using third-party capacity, augmented by our assets, to manage and move our customers’ freight.
Our success depends on our ability to balance our transportation network and efficiently and effectively manage our resources in the delivery of truckload, intermodal, and logistics services to our customers. Resource requirements vary with customer demand, which may be subject to seasonal or general economic conditions. We believe that our ability to properly select freight and adapt to changes in customer transportation needs allows us to efficiently deploy resources and make capital investments in trucks, trailers, containers, and chassis, or obtain qualified third-party capacity at a reasonable price for our logistics segment.
Consistent with the transportation industry, our results of operations generally show a seasonal pattern. The strongest volumes are typically in the late third and fourth quarters. Operating expenses tend to be higher in the winter months primarily due to colder weather, which causes higher maintenance expense and higher fuel consumption from increased idle time.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this section of our report, we present the following non-GAAP financial measures: (1) revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), (2) adjusted income from operations, (3) adjusted operating ratio, and (4) adjusted net income. We also provide reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Management believes the use of each of these non-GAAP measures assists investors in understanding our business by (a) removing the impact of items from our operating results that, in our opinion, do not reflect our core operating performance, (b) providing investors with the same information our management uses internally to assess our core operating performance, and (c) presenting comparable financial results between periods.
In addition, in the case of revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), we believe the measure is useful to investors because it isolates volume, price, and cost changes directly related to industry demand and the way we operate our business from the external factor of fluctuating fuel prices and the programs we have in place to manage fuel price fluctuations. Fuel-related costs and their impact on our industry are important to our results of operations, but they are often independent of other, more relevant factors affecting our results of operations and our industry.
Although we believe these non-GAAP measures are useful to investors, they have limitations as analytical tools and may not be comparable to similar measures disclosed by other companies. You should not consider the non-GAAP measures in this report
in isolation or as substitutes for, or alternatives to, analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. The exclusion of unusual or non-recurringinfrequent items or other adjustments reflected in the non-GAAP measures should not be construed as an inference that our future results will not be affected by unusual or non-recurringinfrequent items or by other items similar to such adjustments. Our management compensates for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results in addition to using the non-GAAP measures.
Enterprise Summary
The following table includes key GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures for the consolidated enterprise. Adjustments to arrive at non-GAAP measures are made at the enterprise level, with the exception of fuel surcharge revenues, which are excluded fromnot included in segment revenues.
| | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
| | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
| | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | 1,145.2 |
| | 1,016.9 |
| | 3,269.6 |
| | 2,915.6 |
| | 1,088.5 |
| | 1,103.2 |
| | 2,170.8 |
| | 2,124.4 |
|
Income from operations | 97.9 |
| | 64.1 |
| | 257.2 |
| | 186.6 |
| | 49.2 |
| | 91.7 |
| | 100.7 |
| | 159.3 |
|
Adjusted income from operations (2) | 97.9 |
| | 69.2 |
| | 263.0 |
| | 181.7 |
| | 83.8 |
| | 97.5 |
| | 135.3 |
| | 165.1 |
|
Operating ratio | 92.4 | % | | 94.2 | % | | 93.0 | % | | 94.2 | % | | 95.9 | % | | 92.6 | % | | 95.8 | % | | 93.3 | % |
Adjusted operating ratio (3) | 91.5 | % | | 93.2 | % | | 92.0 | % | | 93.8 | % | | 92.3 | % | | 91.2 | % | | 93.8 | % | | 92.2 | % |
Net income | $ | 70.7 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 184.1 |
| | $ | 106.0 |
| | $ | 34.5 |
| | $ | 65.8 |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 113.4 |
|
Adjusted net income (4) | 70.7 |
| | 40.0 |
| | 188.4 |
| | 103.0 |
| | 60.3 |
| | 70.1 |
| | 97.2 |
| | 117.7 |
|
| |
(1) | Non-GAAP Measure: RevenuesWe define “revenues (excluding fuel surcharge)” as operating revenues less fuel surcharge revenues, which are excluded from revenues at the segment level. Included below is a reconciliation of operating revenues, the most closely comparable GAAP financial measure, to revenues (excluding fuel surcharge). |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
|
Less: Fuel surcharge revenues | 134.9 |
| | 93.9 |
| | 385.8 |
| | 276.8 |
|
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) | $ | 1,145.2 |
| | $ | 1,016.9 |
| | $ | 3,269.6 |
| | $ | 2,915.6 |
|
| |
(2) | Non-GAAP Measure: AdjustedWe define “adjusted income from operations |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Income from operations | $ | 97.9 |
| | $ | 64.1 |
| | $ | 257.2 |
| | $ | 186.6 |
|
Duplicate chassis costs (a) | — |
| | 5.4 |
| | — |
| | 8.3 |
|
WSL contingent consideration adjustment (b) | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | (13.2 | ) |
Litigation (c) | — |
| | — |
| | 5.8 |
| | — |
|
Adjusted income from operations | $ | 97.9 |
| | $ | 69.2 |
| | $ | 263.0 |
| | $ | 181.7 |
|
| |
(a) | As of December 31, 2017, we completed our migration to an owned chassis model, which required the replacement of rented chassis with owned chassis. Accordingly, we adjusted ouroperations” as income from operations, adjusted to exclude material items that do not reflect our core operating performance. Included below is a reconciliation of income from operations, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to adjusted income from operations. Excluded items for rental costs related to idle chassis as rental units were replaced.the periods shown are explained in the table and notes below. |
| |
(b)(3) | In 2017, we recorded fair value adjustmentsWe define “adjusted operating ratio” as operating expenses, adjusted to exclude material items that do not reflect our core operating performance, divided by revenues (excluding fuel surcharge). Included below is a reconciliation of operating ratio, which is the contingent consideration relatedmost directly comparable GAAP measure, to the acquisition of WSL. See Note 3, Fair Value, for more information. adjusted operating ratio. |
| |
(c)(4) | We define “adjusted net income” as net income, adjusted to exclude material items that do not reflect our core operating performance. Included below is a reconciliation of net income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to adjusted net income. Excluded items for the periods shown are explained below under our explanation of “adjusted income from operations.” |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating revenues | | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
| | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
Less: Fuel surcharge revenues | | 124.2 |
| | 133.1 |
| | 236.0 |
| | 250.9 |
|
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) | | $ | 1,088.5 |
| | $ | 1,103.2 |
| | $ | 2,170.8 |
| | $ | 2,124.4 |
|
Adjusted income from operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Income from operations | | $ | 49.2 |
| | $ | 91.7 |
| | $ | 100.7 |
| | $ | 159.3 |
|
Litigation (1) | | — |
| | 5.8 |
| | — |
| | 5.8 |
|
Goodwill impairment (2) | | 34.6 |
| | — |
| | 34.6 |
| | — |
|
Adjusted income from operations | | $ | 83.8 |
| | $ | 97.5 |
| | $ | 135.3 |
| | $ | 165.1 |
|
| |
(1) | Costs associated with the settlement of a lawsuit that challenged Washington State labor law compliance.compliance during 2018. |
| |
(2) | A triggering event occurred during the second quarter of 2019, as results from our FTFM reporting unit were considerably less than projected, resulting in full impairment of FTFM's goodwill. |
Adjusted operating ratio
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Total operating expenses | | $ | 1,163.5 |
| | $ | 1,144.6 |
| | $ | 2,306.1 |
| | $ | 2,216.0 |
|
Divide by: Operating revenues | | 1,212.7 |
| | 1,236.3 |
| | 2,406.8 |
| | 2,375.3 |
|
Operating ratio | | 95.9 | % | | 92.6 | % | | 95.8 | % | | 93.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | | $ | 1,163.5 |
| | $ | 1,144.6 |
| | $ | 2,306.1 |
| | $ | 2,216.0 |
|
Adjusted for: | | | | | | | | |
Fuel surcharge revenues | | (124.2 | ) | | (133.1 | ) | | (236.0 | ) | | (250.9 | ) |
Litigation | | — |
| | (5.8 | ) | | — |
| | (5.8 | ) |
Goodwill impairment | | (34.6 | ) | | — |
| | (34.6 | ) | | — |
|
Adjusted total operating expense | | $ | 1,004.7 |
| | $ | 1,005.7 |
| | $ | 2,035.5 |
| | $ | 1,959.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
| | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
Less: Fuel surcharge revenues | | 124.2 |
| | 133.1 |
| | 236.0 |
| | 250.9 |
|
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) | | $ | 1,088.5 |
| | $ | 1,103.2 |
| | $ | 2,170.8 |
| | $ | 2,124.4 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Adjusted operating ratio | | 92.3 | % | | 91.2 | % | | 93.8 | % | | 92.2 | % |
Adjusted net income
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net income | | $ | 34.5 |
| | $ | 65.8 |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 113.4 |
|
Litigation | | — |
| | 5.8 |
| | — |
| | 5.8 |
|
Goodwill impairment | | 34.6 |
| | — |
| | 34.6 |
| | — |
|
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments(1) | | (8.8 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | (8.8 | ) | | (1.5 | ) |
Adjusted net income | | $ | 60.3 |
| | $ | 70.1 |
| | $ | 97.2 |
| | $ | 117.7 |
|
| |
(3)(1) | Non-GAAP Measure: Adjusted operating ratioTax impacts are calculated using the applicable consolidated federal and state effective tax rate, modified to remove the impact of discrete tax adjustments. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions, except ratios) | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Total operating expenses | $ | 1,182.2 |
| | $ | 1,046.7 |
| | $ | 3,398.2 |
| | $ | 3,005.8 |
|
Divide by: Operating revenues | 1,280.1 |
| | 1,110.8 |
| | 3,655.4 |
| | 3,192.4 |
|
Operating ratio | 92.4 | % | | 94.2 | % | | 93.0 | % | | 94.2 | % |
| | | | | | | |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
|
Less: Fuel surcharge revenues | 134.9 |
| | 93.9 |
| | 385.8 |
| | 276.8 |
|
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) | $ | 1,145.2 |
| | $ | 1,016.9 |
| | $ | 3,269.6 |
| | $ | 2,915.6 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total operating expenses | $ | 1,182.2 |
| | $ | 1,046.7 |
| | $ | 3,398.2 |
| | $ | 3,005.8 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Adjusted for: | | | | | | | |
Fuel surcharge revenues | (134.9 | ) | | (93.9 | ) | | (385.8 | ) | | (276.8 | ) |
Duplicate chassis costs | — |
| | (5.4 | ) | | — |
| | (8.3 | ) |
WSL contingent consideration adjustment | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 13.2 |
|
Litigation | — |
| | — |
| | (5.8 | ) | | — |
|
Adjusted total operating expense | $ | 1,047.3 |
| | $ | 947.7 |
| | $ | 3,006.6 |
| | $ | 2,733.9 |
|
| . |
| | | | | | |
Adjusted operating ratio | 91.5 | % | | 93.2 | % | | 92.0 | % | | 93.8 | % |
| |
(4) | Non-GAAP Measure: Adjusted net income |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Net income | $ | 70.7 |
| | $ | 36.9 |
| | $ | 184.1 |
| | $ | 106.0 |
|
Duplicate chassis costs | — |
| | 5.4 |
| | — |
| | 8.3 |
|
WSL contingent consideration adjustment | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | (13.2 | ) |
Litigation | — |
| | — |
| | 5.8 |
| | — |
|
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments | — |
| | (2.0 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | 1.9 |
|
Adjusted net income | $ | 70.7 |
| | $ | 40.0 |
| | $ | 188.4 |
| | $ | 103.0 |
|
Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 Compared to Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018
Net Income
Net income increased $33.8decreased $31.3 million, approximately 92%48%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017,2018, primarily as a result of strong pricing across all three segments, increased volume in our Intermodal and Logistics segments, and the impact of the income tax rate reduction due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enactedFTFM goodwill impairment recorded in December 2017.2019 of $34.6 million before taxes. In addition, the Truckload segment's freight volume declined in the second quarter of 2019 due to soft market demand. Adjusted net income increased $30.7decreased $9.8 million, approximately 77%14.0%.
Revenues
Enterprise operating revenues increased $169.3decreased $23.6 million, approximately 15%2%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017. Increased revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) resulted primarily from strong pricing and volume increases in our Logistics and Intermodal segments, which increased $59.6 million and $56.1 million, respectively, driven by growth in our brokerage business and an industry-wide shortage in driver capacity. Other factors2018.
Factors contributing to the increase in revenuesdecrease were as follows:
a $41.0$32.7 million increase in fuel surcharge revenues and a $13.3 million increasedecrease in our Truckload segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), resulting from reduced Truckload volume largely due to lower market demand,
a $23.7 million decrease in our Logistics segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) primarily due to price.one of the Company's import/export customers insourcing their warehouse management function in April 2019, and
an $8.9 million decrease in fuel surcharge revenues primarily related to decreased Truckload volumes.
The above factors were partially offset by:
a $28.1 million increase in our Intermodal segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) primarily due to improved revenue per order and an increase in order volume and
a $16.2 million increase in revenues from equipment sales by our leasing business under sales-type leases.
Enterprise revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $128.3decreased $14.7 million, approximately 13%1%.
Income from Operations and Operating Ratio
Enterprise income from operations increased $33.8decreased $42.5 million, approximately 53%46%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017,2018, primarily due to strong pricing across all segments, combined with increased volume of 20%the $34.6 million FTFM goodwill impairment and 11%increase in our Logistics and Intermodal segments, respectively. The increasesoperating losses, as FTFM operating losses exceeded prior year by $9.9 million. Lower market demand negatively impacted Truckload profitability, but decreases were partially offset by higher driver-related costsreduced performance-based incentive compensation, Company benefits, and a loss of $9.5 million in FTFM.driver related costs. Adjusted income from operations increased $28.7decreased $13.7 million, approximately 41%14%.
Enterprise operating ratio improvedweakened on both a GAAP basis and an adjusted basis. OurAmong other factors, our operating ratio can be negatively impacted by changes in portfolio mix when our higher operating ratio, less asset-focused Logistics segment grows faster than our lower operating ratio, capital-intensive Truckload segment.
Key operating expense items that impacted our income from operations and operating ratiofluctuations are described below.
Purchased transportation costs increased $117.2$18.1 million, or 29%4%, quarter over quarter, driven byquarter. Order volume increases of 20% and 11%,growth in our Logistics and Intermodal segments, respectively. The additional volumesegment of 2% combined with an increase in various Intermodal third-party costs, including rail, resulted in higher purchased transportation costs fortransportation. While our brokerage business in our Logistics and Intermodal segmentssegment experienced volume growth of $53.9 million and $45.0 million, respectively. Elevated carrier prices and rail15%, lower purchased transportation rates also contributed to the riseresulted in a nominal change in purchased transportation costs quarter over quarter due to driver capacity constraints. As a percentage of revenues, purchased transportation costs increased 4% quarter over quarter.
Salaries, wages, and benefits increased $9.8decreased $28.4 million, or 3%9%, quarter over quarter, driven by an increase in incentive compensation, higher commissions in our Logistics segment, and increased non-driver associate wages in our FTFM terminal operations primarilylargely due to the conversion fromelimination of salaries, wages, and benefits associated with warehouse management operations insourced by an agentimport/export customer in April 2019, which will continue for the remainder of the year. Lower performance-based incentive compensation and Company benefit costs, as well as various cost savings initiatives, also contributed to company driver model.the decrease. Salaries, wages, and benefits decreased 3%2% quarter over quarter on a percentage of revenues basis.
Fuel and fuel taxes for our company trucks increased $11.1decreased $12.0 million, or 15%14%, quarter over quarter, driven primarily by an increasea 6% decrease in thecompany driver miles and a decrease in cost of fuel per gallon. The decrease in company driver miles was partially offset by increased owner-operator miles, which do not impact company fuel costs. A significant portion of changes in fuel costs isare recovered through our fuel surcharge programs.
Depreciation and amortization increased$2.8 $3.0 million, or 4%, quarter over quarter, primarily attributabledue to trailer depreciation as we replaced trailersreplacement tractors to maintain an appropriateachieve a younger age of fleet. Our 2017 conversion from leasedfleet and our investment in chassis and containers to owned chassissupport growth in our Intermodal segment also contributed to the increase.
segment.Operating supplies and expenses decreased $11.8increased $12.5 million, or 9%10%, quarter over quarter. The decrease was mainly due to $9.0 million lower rent expense, primarily due toquarter driven by growth in equipment sales under sales-type leases by our conversion from leased to owned chassis, and $2.3 million ofleasing business resulting in higher gains on sales of equipment. We also experienced a decrease in costscost of goods sold forof $14.1 million and increased software subscription costs and Intermodal rail yard ramp storage expenses. These increases were offset by a combined $6.2 million decrease in temporary worker pay due to insourcing by one of our leasing business, which is partimport/export customers in April 2019 and reduced maintenance and parts spend attributable to less company driver miles and younger age of the operating suppliesfleet.
Insurance and expense line item, quarter over quarter, as a result of the mix between new and used leased units.
Other generalrelated expenses increased $4.5$3.2 million, or 14%, quarter over quarter. The primary reason for the increase was additional driver training and recruitingpredominately due to an increase in the severity of auto losses.
Other general expenses as adecreased $12.1 million, or 30%, quarter over quarter. Decreased other general expenses were the result of industry-widea $5.8 million decrease in litigation costs and reduced driver capacity shortages.recruiting and training costs.
Segment Contributions to Results of Operations
The following tables summarize revenue and earnings by segment.
| | | | | | | | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Revenues by Segment (in millions) | Three Months Ended September 30, | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| 2018 | | 2017 | |
Truckload | $ | 565.0 |
| | $ | 551.7 |
| | $ | 534.9 |
| | $ | 567.6 |
|
Intermodal | 252.1 |
| | 196.0 |
| | 259.8 |
| | 231.7 |
|
Logistics | 268.7 |
| | 209.1 |
| | 227.0 |
| | 250.7 |
|
Other | 91.2 |
| | 85.4 |
| | 95.8 |
| | 79.0 |
|
Fuel surcharge | 134.9 |
| | 93.9 |
| | 124.2 |
| | 133.1 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations | (31.8 | ) | | (25.3 | ) | | (29.0 | ) | | (25.8 | ) |
Operating revenues | $ | 1,280.1 |
| | $ | 1,110.8 |
| | $ | 1,212.7 |
| | $ | 1,236.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment (in millions) | Three Months Ended September 30, | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| 2018 | | 2017 | |
Truckload | $ | 53.1 |
| | $ | 41.1 |
| | $ | 7.9 |
| | $ | 61.2 |
|
Intermodal | 36.1 |
| | 12.2 |
| | 30.5 |
| | 32.4 |
|
Logistics | 12.5 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 9.2 |
| | 10.4 |
|
Other | (3.8 | ) | | 1.7 |
| | 1.6 |
| | (12.3 | ) |
Income from operations | 97.9 |
| | 64.1 |
| | 49.2 |
| | 91.7 |
|
Adjustments: | | | | | | | |
Duplicate chassis costs | — |
| | 5.4 |
| |
WSL contingent consideration adjustment | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | |
Litigation | | | — |
| | 5.8 |
|
Goodwill impairment | | | 34.6 |
| | — |
|
Adjusted income from operations | $ | 97.9 |
| | $ | 69.2 |
| | $ | 83.8 |
| | $ | 97.5 |
|
Truckload
The following table presents our key performance indicators for our Truckload segment for the periods indicated, consistent with how revenues and expenses are reported internally for segment purposes. Descriptions of the four quadrants that make up our Truckload segment are as follows:
| |
• | Dedicated standard - Transportation services with equipment devoted to customers under long-term contracts utilizing standard dry van trailing equipment. |
| |
• | Dedicated specialty - Transportation services with devoted equipment to customers under long-term contracts utilizing bulk, temperature controlled, flatbed, straight truck and other specialty equipment. |
| |
• | For-hire standard - Transportation services of one-way shipments utilizing standard dry van trailing equipment. |
| |
• | For-hire specialty - Transportation services of one-way shipments utilizing bulk, temperature controlled, flatbed, straight truck and other specialty equipment. |
| | | Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
Dedicated standard | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 81.2 |
| | $ | 73.4 |
| $ | 84.2 |
| | $ | 80.0 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 1,671 |
| | 1,654 |
| 1,818 |
| | 1,597 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,792 |
| | $ | 3,458 |
| $ | 3,609 |
| | $ | 3,897 |
|
Dedicated specialty(7) | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 95.9 |
| | $ | 110.8 |
| $ | 93.4 |
| | $ | 102.2 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 2,107 |
| | 2,333 |
| 2,173 |
| | 2,308 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,551 |
| | $ | 3,700 |
| $ | 3,347 |
| | $ | 3,443 |
|
For-hire standard | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 306.3 |
| | $ | 289.7 |
| $ | 287.6 |
| | $ | 303.9 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 6,094 |
| | 6,345 |
| 6,154 |
| | 6,034 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,921 |
| | $ | 3,556 |
| $ | 3,640 |
| | $ | 3,917 |
|
For-hire specialty(7) | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 81.6 |
| | $ | 77.8 |
| $ | 69.7 |
| | $ | 82.6 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 1,521 |
| | 1,558 |
| 1,461 |
| | 1,557 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 4,180 |
| | $ | 3,882 |
| $ | 3,716 |
| | $ | 4,125 |
|
Total Truckload | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 565.0 |
| | $ | 551.7 |
| |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (6) | | $ | 534.9 |
| | $ | 567.6 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 11,393 |
| | 11,890 |
| 11,606 |
| | 11,496 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,868 |
| | $ | 3,614 |
| $ | 3,590 |
| | $ | 3,847 |
|
Average company trucks (3) | 8,634 |
| | 9,119 |
| 8,728 |
| | 8,789 |
|
Average owner-operator trucks (3) | 2,759 |
| | 2,771 |
| 2,878 |
| | 2,707 |
|
Trailers | 38,026 |
| | 38,615 |
| 37,409 |
| | 38,089 |
|
Operating ratio (5) | 90.6 | % | | 92.6 | % | 98.5 | % | | 89.2 | % |
| |
(1) | Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), in millions.millions, exclude revenue in-transit. |
| |
(2) | Includes company trucks and owner-operator trucks. |
| |
(3) | Calculated based on beginning and end of month counts and represents the average number of trucks available to haul freight over the specified timeframe. |
| |
(4) | Calculated excluding fuel surcharge and revenue in-transit, consistent with how revenue is reported internally for segment purposes, using weighted workdays. |
| |
(5) | Calculated as segment operating expenses divided by segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge). including revenue in-transit and related expenses at the operating segment level. |
| |
(6) | Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), in millions, include revenue in-transit at the operating segment level, and therefore does not sum with amounts presented above. |
| |
(7) | 2018 key performance indicators for dedicated specialty and for-hire specialty differ from those previously reported for the three months ended June 30, 2018 due to the reclassification of a customer between quadrants. |
Truckload revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $13.3decreased $32.7 million, approximately 2%6%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017, primarily due to strong contract pricing,2018. A decline in volume of 7% was partially offset by reduced volume.a 1% increase in price. Decreased volume was the result of a difficult demand environment and drove lower productivity. The increase in price compared to the second quarter of 2018 was due to rate renewals, partially offset by fewer premium and promotional revenue opportunities. Revenue per truck per week increased $254,decreased $257, or 7%, quarter over quarter.quarter as a result of lower productivity driven primarily by replacement trucks exceeding related dispositions, as well as the timing of dedicated start-ups.
Truckload income from operations increased $12.0decreased $53.3 million, approximately 29%87%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017, primarily2018 due mostly to contract price improvementthe $34.6 million goodwill impairment and increased gains on equipment sales,lower operating results within FTFM. FTFM's operating losses exceeded the second quarter of 2018 by $9.9 million. A decline in Truckload volume of 7% also contributed to the decrease in income from operations but was partially offset by highera reduction in driver related costs and a losscompared to the second quarter of $9.5 million from our FTFM operating segment. FTFM results were impacted by reduced volume, a bankruptcy write-off, and operational inefficiencies.2018.
Intermodal
The following table presents our key performance indicators for our Intermodal segment for the periods indicated.
| | | Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
Orders(1) | 115,936 |
| | 104,452 |
| 114,272 |
| | 111,700 |
|
Containers | 21,288 |
| | 17,557 |
| 22,788 |
| | 19,484 |
|
Trucks (1)(2) | 1,482 |
| | 1,293 |
| 1,539 |
| | 1,371 |
|
Revenue per order (2)(3) | $ | 2,175 |
| | $ | 1,876 |
| $ | 2,266 |
| | $ | 2,041 |
|
Operating ratio (3)(4) | 85.7 | % | | 93.8 | % | 88.2 | % | | 86.0 | % |
| |
(1) | Based on delivered orders. |
| |
(2) | Includes company trucks and owner-operator trucks at the end of the period. |
| |
(2)(3) | Calculated excluding fuel surcharge and revenue in-transit, consistent with how revenue is reported internally for segment purposes. |
| |
(3)(4) | Calculated as segment operating expenses divided by segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge). including revenue in-transit and related expenses at the operating segment level. |
Intermodal revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $56.1$28.1 million, approximately 29%12%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017. The2018. This increase was due to a 16%11% increase in revenue per order, as well as an 11%due in part to 2018 contract carry-over and 2019 contract renewals, increased length of haul, and a 2% increase in volume, partially due to the conversion of over-the-road freight, driven by the industry-wide shortage of driver capacity. Intermodal added approximately 3,700 containers to its fleet as of third quarter 2018 compared to the same quarter of 2017.orders.
Intermodal income from operations increased $23.9decreased $1.9 million, approximately 196%6%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017. The main drivers2018. Volume and revenue per order improvements were higher priceoffset by increases in purchased transportation and volume, as well as reduced costs relatedrail ramp storage costs. Asset utilization was also unfavorable compared to the 2017 conversion from leased to owned chassis.same quarter in 2018.
Logistics
The following table presents our key performance indicatorindicators for our Logistics segment for the periods indicated.
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 |
Operating ratio (1) | 95.3 | % | | 95.6 | % |
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating ratio (1) | 96.0 | % | | 95.9 | % |
Brokerage revenues as a percentage of Logistics revenues (2) | 87.5 | % | | 78.9 | % |
| |
(1) | Calculated as segment operating expenses divided by segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) including revenue in-transit and related expenses at the operating segment level. |
| |
(2) | Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), consistent with howin millions, including revenue is reported internally for segment purposes.in-transit. |
Logistics revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $59.6decreased $23.7 million, approximately 29%9%, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 compared to the same quarter in 2017,2018. This decrease was primarily due to growthone of the Company's import/export customers insourcing their warehouse management function in our brokerage business, which experienced 20%April 2019. Despite volume growth andof 15% compared to the same quarter in 2018, brokerage revenues increased revenue per order.only modestly due to a compression in rates, particularly in the spot market.
Logistics income from operations decreased $1.2 million, approximately 12%, in the second quarter of 2019 compared to the same quarter in 2018, primarily due to compressed net revenue in brokerage, as well as reduced volumes within our import/export and supply chain management businesses.
Other
Included in Other was income from operations of $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2019, compared to a loss of $12.3 million in the same quarter in 2018. The $13.9 million change resulted from the $5.8 million settlement of a lawsuit that challenged Washington State labor law compliance in 2018, a decrease in performance-based incentive compensation, and a $2.1 million increase in income from operations from our leasing business driven by increased $3.4lease activity.
Other Income (Expense)
Other expense decreased $0.1 million, approximately 3%, in the second quarter of 2019 compared to the same quarter in 2018 due primarily to a $1.7 million increase in interest income and a $1.7 million decrease in net foreign currency losses, offset by the 2018 recognition of a $2.5 million pre-tax gain related to our ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. and a $0.8 million increase in interest expense. See Note 5, Investments, for more information on Platform Science.
Income Tax Expense
Our provision for income taxes decreased $11.1 million, approximately 49%, in the second quarter of 2019 compared to the same quarter in 2018 due to lower taxable income. The effective income tax rate was 24.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to 25.5% for the same period last year.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net Income
Net income decreased $42.0 million, approximately 37%, in the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017, primarily due to brokerage volume growth as noted above and effective net revenue management.
Other
Our Other segment posted a loss from operations of $3.8 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared to income of $1.7 million the same quarter in 2017. The $5.5 million increased net loss was driven primarily by an increase in incentive compensation.
Other Expense (Income)
Other expense decreased $0.8 million, approximately 24%, in the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017, primarily due to increased interest income.
Income Tax Expense
Our provision for income taxes increased $0.8 million, approximately 3%, in the third quarter of 2018 compared to the same quarter in 2017 due to higher taxable income, offset by a lower income tax rate. The effective income tax rate was 25.8% for the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 compared to 39.2% for the same period last year, driven by the reduction in the income tax rate due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net Income
Net income increased $78.1 million, approximately 74%, in the nine months ended September 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, primarily due to an increasethe FTFM goodwill impairment recorded in revenue as a result of strong pricing and market demand and2019 for $34.6 million before taxes. In addition, the impact of the income tax rate reductionTruckload segment's freight volume declined in 2019 due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017.softer market demand. Adjusted net income increased $85.4decreased $20.5 million, approximately 83%17%.
Revenues
Enterprise operating revenues increased $463.0$31.5 million, approximately 15%1%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017. Increased revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) resulted from strong pricing and volume increases across the Logistics and Intermodal segments, which increased $154.5 million and $109.6 million, respectively, driven by growth in our brokerage business and an industry-wide shortage in driver capacity. Other factors2018.
Factors contributing to the increase in revenues were as follows:
a $109.0 million increase in fuel surcharge revenues,
a $68.2$63.8 million increase in our TruckloadIntermodal segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), primarily due to price,improved revenue per order and an increase in order volume and
a $16.0$38.9 million increase in revenues from equipment sales by our leasing business.business under sales-type leases.
The above factors were partially offset by:
a $51.4 million decrease in Truckload revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) resulting from reduced Truckload volume due to lower market demand,
a $14.9 million decrease in fuel surcharge revenues primarily related to decreased Truckload volumes, and
a $1.0 million decrease in Logistics revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) primarily due to one of the Company's import/export customers insourcing their warehouse management function in April 2019, partially offset by a 17% increase in brokerage volumes.
Enterprise revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $354.0$46.4 million, approximately 12%2%.
Income from Operations and Operating Ratio
Enterprise income from operations increased $70.6decreased $58.6 million, approximately 38%37%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, primarily due to the $34.6 million goodwill impairment and an increase in revenue and improved margins across segments. Margin improvement for the Intermodal segment was due in part to an improved cost position from the conversion from leased to owned chassis. These factorsoperating losses, as FTFM operating losses exceeded prior year by $15.6 million. Lower market demand negatively impacted Truckload profitability, but decreases were partially offset by FTFM's loss of $20.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. reduced performance-based incentive compensation and Company benefits.
Adjusted income from operations increased $81.3decreased $29.8 million, approximately 45%18%.
Enterprise operating ratio improvedweakened on both a GAAP basis and an adjusted basis. Our operating ratio can be negatively impacted when our higher operating ratio, less asset-focused Logistics segment grows faster than our lower operating ratio, capital-intensive Truckload segment.
Key operating expense items that impacted our income from operations and operating ratiofluctuations are described below.
Purchased transportation costs increased $273.1$66.4 million, or 24%7%, period over period. The largest driverOrder volume growth in our Intermodal and Logistics segments of the increase was3% and 17%, respectively, combined with an increase in brokerage volumesvarious Intermodal third-party costs, including rail, resulted in higher purchased transportation. This was offset by a decrease in purchased transportation per order within our Logistics segment based on additional carrier capacity in 2019 which relies heavily on third-party carriers, resulting in $134.9 million higher purchased transportation costs. Intermodal and Truckload segments' purchased transportation costs also increased $79.9 million and $52.7 million, respectively. Increased carrier prices contributedled to the rise in purchased transportation costs across all reportable segments year over year. As a percentagecompression of revenues, purchased transportation costs increased 3% period over period.carrier rates.
Salaries, wages, and benefits increased $33.2decreased $26.7 million, or 4%, period over period, driven by increased incentive compensation, higher driver pay, higher commissions in our Logistics segment, and increased non-driver associate wages in our FTFM terminal operations primarilylargely due to the conversion fromelimination of salaries, wages, and benefits associated with warehouse management operations insourced by an agentimport/export customer in April 2019, which will continue for the remainder of the year. Lower performance-based incentive compensation and Company benefit costs, as well as various cost savings initiatives, also contributed to company driver model. Asthe decrease. Salaries, wages, and benefits decreased 1% period over period on a percentage of revenues salaries, wages, and benefits decreased 3% period over period.basis.
Fuel and fuel taxes for our company trucks increased $39.6decreased $21.9 million, or 18%13%, period over period, driven by an increasea 7% decrease in thecompany driver miles and a decrease in cost ofper gallon. The decrease in company driver miles was partially offset by increased owner-operator miles, which do not impact company fuel per gallon.costs. A significant portion of changes in fuel costs isare recovered through our fuel surcharge programs.
Depreciation and amortization increased $9.9$4.7 million, or 5%3%, period over period, primarily driven by increased trailer depreciation, as we replaced trailersdue to maintain an appropriatereplacement tractors to achieve a younger age of fleet and our investment in chassis and containers to reduce unbilled miles; and tractor depreciation, as a result of the change in mix of owned versus leased tractors. The 2017 conversion from leased to owned chassissupport growth in our Intermodal segment also resulted in increased depreciation.segment.
Operating supplies and expenses decreased $5.0increased $38.5 million, or 1%16%, period over period. The decreaseincrease was primarilymainly due to $19.4 million lower rent expense, primarily due to our 2017 conversion from leased to owned chassis, and a $2.9 million reduction in temporary worker pay in our FTFM terminal operations due to the conversion from an agent to company driver model. This was offset by an increase in the amount of equipment soldsales under sales-type leases by our leasing business, resulting in higher cost of goods sold which is part of $34.0 million and increased software subscription costs and Intermodal rail yard ramp storage expenses. Increases in the operating supplies and expense line item, andabove costs were offset by a $2.2combined $4.9 million decrease in gains on salestemporary worker pay due to insourcing of equipment.
our import/export customers in April 2019 and reduced maintenance and parts spend attributable to less company driver miles and younger age of fleet.
Insurance and related expenses increased $5.1$8.3 million, or 8%, period over period, primarily due to increased severity of auto losses and increased volume of cargo losses.
Other general expenses increased $36.5 million, or 48%18%, period over period. The primary increase was predominately due to an increase in the reductionseverity of the contingent liabilityauto losses, as well as additional collision expense associated with weather related to the WSL acquisition adjustmentaccidents.
Other general expenses decreased $13.8 million, or 18%, period over period as a result of $13.2a $5.8 million during 2017. There was also $8.9 million higherdecrease in litigation costs, decreased driver recruiting and training costs, a $5.8and lower professional service fees of $3.5 million, increasedriven by higher capitalization of IT costs in litigation costs, and an increase2019.
Segment Contributions to Results of Operations
The following tables summarize revenue and earnings by segment:
| | | | | | | | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
Revenues by Segment (in millions) | Revenues by Segment (in millions) | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Revenues by Segment (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| 2018 | | 2017 | |
Truckload | Truckload | $ | 1,685.0 |
| | $ | 1,616.8 |
| Truckload | | $ | 1,066.7 |
| | $ | 1,118.1 |
|
Intermodal | Intermodal | 681.0 |
| | 571.4 |
| Intermodal | | 497.4 |
| | 433.6 |
|
Logistics | Logistics | 739.2 |
| | 584.7 |
| Logistics | | 470.9 |
| | 471.9 |
|
Other | Other | 248.5 |
| | 214.5 |
| Other | | 195.7 |
| | 153.1 |
|
Fuel surcharge | Fuel surcharge | 385.8 |
| | 276.8 |
| Fuel surcharge | | 236.0 |
| | 250.9 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations | Inter-segment eliminations | (84.1 | ) | | (71.8 | ) | Inter-segment eliminations | | (59.9 | ) | | (52.3 | ) |
Operating revenues | Operating revenues | $ | 3,655.4 |
| | $ | 3,192.4 |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 2,406.8 |
| | $ | 2,375.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment (in millions) | Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment (in millions) | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Income (Loss) from Operations by Segment (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | |
Truckload | Truckload | $ | 162.8 |
| | $ | 132.9 |
| Truckload | | $ | 31.1 |
| | $ | 107.8 |
|
Intermodal | Intermodal | 88.7 |
| | 30.0 |
| Intermodal | | 50.4 |
| | 54.6 |
|
Logistics | Logistics | 30.4 |
| | 20.8 |
| Logistics | | 19.5 |
| | 18.2 |
|
Other | Other | (24.7 | ) | | 2.9 |
| Other | | (0.3 | ) | | (21.3 | ) |
Income from operations | Income from operations | 257.2 |
| | 186.6 |
| Income from operations | | 100.7 |
| | 159.3 |
|
Adjustments: | Adjustments: | | | | Adjustments: | | | | |
Duplicate chassis costs | — |
| | 8.3 |
| |
WSL contingent consideration adjustment | — |
| | (13.2 | ) | |
Litigation | Litigation | 5.8 |
| | — |
| Litigation | | — |
| | 5.8 |
|
Goodwill impairment | | Goodwill impairment | | 34.6 |
| | — |
|
Adjusted income from operations | Adjusted income from operations | $ | 263.0 |
| | $ | 181.7 |
| Adjusted income from operations | | $ | 135.3 |
| | $ | 165.1 |
|
Truckload
The following table presents our key performance indicators for our truckloadTruckload segment for the periods indicated, consistent with how revenues and expenses are reported internally for segment purposes:purposes. Descriptions of the four quadrants that make up our Truckload segment are as follows:
| |
• | Dedicated standard - Transportation services with equipment devoted to customers under long-term contracts utilizing standard dry van trailing equipment. |
| |
• | Dedicated specialty - Transportation services with devoted equipment to customers under long-term contracts utilizing bulk, temperature controlled, flatbed, straight truck and other specialty equipment. |
| |
• | For-hire standard - Transportation services of one-way shipments utilizing standard dry van trailing equipment. |
| |
• | For-hire specialty - Transportation services of one-way shipments utilizing bulk, temperature controlled, flatbed, straight truck and other specialty equipment. |
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
Dedicated standard | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 237.7 |
| | $ | 216.7 |
| $ | 168.5 |
| | $ | 156.5 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 1,637 |
| | 1,641 |
| 1,808 |
| | 1,613 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,780 |
| | $ | 3,436 |
| $ | 3,648 |
| | $ | 3,790 |
|
Dedicated specialty(7) | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 304.5 |
| | $ | 311.4 |
| $ | 188.5 |
| | $ | 208.6 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 2,279 |
| | 2,231 |
| 2,152 |
| | 2,359 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,478 |
| | $ | 3,631 |
| $ | 3,430 |
| | $ | 3,454 |
|
For-hire standard | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 901.2 |
| | $ | 853.5 |
| $ | 568.5 |
| | $ | 594.9 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 6,096 |
| | 6,341 |
| 6,125 |
| | 6,090 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,848 |
| | $ | 3,502 |
| $ | 3,634 |
| | $ | 3,816 |
|
For-hire specialty(7) | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 241.6 |
| | $ | 235.2 |
| $ | 139.5 |
| | $ | 160.0 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 1,551 |
| | 1,602 |
| 1,488 |
| | 1,564 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 4,052 |
| | $ | 3,817 |
| $ | 3,669 |
| | $ | 3,998 |
|
Total Truckload | | | | | | |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (1) | $ | 1,685.0 |
| | $ | 1,616.8 |
| |
Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) (6) | | $ | 1,066.7 |
| | $ | 1,118.1 |
|
Average trucks (2) (3) | 11,563 |
| | 11,815 |
| 11,573 |
| | 11,626 |
|
Revenue per truck per week (4) | $ | 3,793 |
| | $ | 3,560 |
| $ | 3,603 |
| | $ | 3,763 |
|
Average company trucks (3) | 8,833 |
| | 9,059 |
| 8,706 |
| | 8,911 |
|
Average owner-operator trucks (3) | 2,730 |
| | 2,756 |
| 2,867 |
| | 2,715 |
|
Trailers | 38,026 |
| | 38,615 |
| 37,409 |
| | 38,089 |
|
Operating ratio (5) | 90.3 | % | | 91.8 | % | 97.1 | % | | 90.4 | % |
| |
(1) | Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), in millions.millions, exclude revenue in-transit. |
| |
(2) | Includes company trucks and owner-operator trucks. |
| |
(3) | Calculated based on beginning and end of month counts and represents the average number of trucks available to haul freight over the specified timeframe. |
| |
(4) | Calculated excluding fuel surcharge and revenue in-transit, consistent with how revenue is reported internally for segment purposes, using weighted workdays. |
| |
(5) | Calculated as segment operating expenses divided by segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge). including revenue in-transit and related expenses at the operating segment level. |
| |
(6) | Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), in millions, include revenue in-transit at the operating segment level, and therefore does not sum with amounts presented above. |
| |
(7) | 2018 key performance indicators for dedicated specialty and for-hire specialty differ from those previously reported for the six months ended June 30, 2018 due to the reclassification of a customer between quadrants. |
Truckload revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $68.2decreased $51.4 million, approximately 4%5%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017, primarily due to strong contract pricing,2018. A decline in volume of 8% was partially offset by reduced volume.a 3% increase in price. Decreased volume was the result of a difficult demand environment and drove lower productivity. The increase in price period over period was due to contract carry-over and 2019 rate renewals, partially offset by fewer promotional and premium revenue opportunities. Revenue per truck per week increased $233,decreased $160, or 7%4%, yearperiod over year.period as a result of lower productivity driven primarily by replacement trucks exceeding related dispositions, as well as lower freight volumes.
Truckload income from operations increased $29.9decreased $76.7 million, approximately 22%71%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, primarily due to contract price improvement,the $34.6 million goodwill impairment and an additional $15.6 million in operating losses within FTFM. Lower volumes, as discussed above, also contributed to the decrease but were partially offset by increaseda reduction in driver related costs, a loss of approximately $20.3 million from FTFM, and lower gains on equipment sales. FTFM results were impacted by reduced volume, a bankruptcy write-off, and operational inefficiencies.costs.
Intermodal
The following table presents our key performance indicators for our intermodal segment for the periods indicated.
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
Orders(1) | 329,014 |
| | 305,074 |
| 218,784 |
| | 213,078 |
|
Containers | 21,288 |
| | 17,557 |
| 22,788 |
| | 19,484 |
|
Trucks (1)(2) | 1,482 |
| | 1,293 |
| 1,539 |
| | 1,371 |
|
Revenue per order (2)(3) | $ | 2,070 |
| | $ | 1,873 |
| $ | 2,257 |
| | $ | 2,013 |
|
Operating ratio (3)(4) | 87.0 | % | | 94.7 | % | 89.9 | % | | 87.4 | % |
| |
(1) | Based on delivered orders. |
| |
(2) | Includes company trucks and owner-operator trucks at the end of the period. |
| |
(2)(3) | Calculated excluding fuel surcharge and revenue in-transit, consistent with how revenue is reported internally for segment purposes. |
| |
(3)(4) | Calculated as segment operating expenses divided by segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge). including revenue in-transit and related expenses at the operating segment level. |
Intermodal revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $109.6$63.8 million, approximately 19%15%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018. The increase was driven by an 11%a 12% increase in revenue per order, increased length of haul, and 8% higher volume. Intermodal added approximately 3,700 containers to its fleet as of third quarter 2018 compared to the same quarter of 2017.a 3% increase in orders.
Intermodal income from operations increased $58.7decreased $4.2 million, approximately 196%8%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017, due to increased2018. Increased volume and revenue per order noted above as well as reduced costs duewere more than offset by higher purchased transportation, equipment depreciation, and rail ramp storage costs. Asset utilization was also unfavorable compared to the 2017 conversion from leased to owned chassis.same period of 2018.
Logistics
The following table presents our key performance indicatorindicators for our logistics segment for the periods indicated.
|
| | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2018 | | 2017 |
Operating ratio (1) | 95.9 | % | | 96.4 | % |
|
| | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2019 | | 2018 |
Operating ratio (1) | 95.9 | % | | 96.2 | % |
Brokerage revenues as a percentage of Logistics revenues (2) | 81.9 | % | | 78.0 | % |
| |
(1) | Calculated as segment operating expenses divided by segment revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) including revenue in-transit and related expenses at the operating segment level. |
| |
(2) | Revenues (excluding fuel surcharge), consistent with howin millions, including revenue is reported internally for segment purposes.in-transit. |
Logistics revenues (excluding fuel surcharge) increased $154.5decreased $1.0 million, approximately 26%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, primarily due to growthone of the Company's import/export customers insourcing their warehouse management function in ourApril 2019. Increased brokerage business. Brokerage volumes increasedof 17% were offset by a decrease in revenue per order related to compression in rates, particularly in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 over the same period in 2017 combined with increased revenue per order.spot market.
Logistics income from operations increased $9.6$1.3 million, approximately 46%7%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, primarily due to the brokerage volume growth as noted above, and effectiveoffset by compression of net revenue, management.higher commissions in our brokerage business, and reduced volumes within our import/export business.
Other
Our Other segment postedrecorded a loss from operations of $24.7$0.3 million in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, compared to incomea loss of $2.9$21.3 million in the same period in 2017. The $27.6 million decrease was driven by the period-over-period impact of the $13.2 million adjustment of2018. Factors contributing to decreased losses include a contingent liability from the WSL acquisitionreduction in 2017. Other factors included an increase inperformance-based incentive compensation, the $5.8 million settlement of a lawsuit that challenged Washington State labor law compliance in 2018, a $5.1 million increase in income from operations from our leasing business driven by increased lease activity, and professional services fees, including incremental costs associated with operating as a public company.decrease in Company benefit costs.
Other Expense (Income)
Other expense decreased $4.3$1.1 million, approximately 32%18%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, primarily from a $3.6$3.2 million increase in interest income and a $0.9 million decrease in net interest expense due to lower debt levels and increased interest income andforeign currency losses, offset by the 2018 recognition of a $2.5 million pre-tax gain related to our ownership interest in Platform Science, Inc. and a $0.5 million increase in interest expense. See Note 4, 5, Investments, for more information on Platform Science. These items were partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in net foreign currency losses.
Income Tax Expense
Our provision for income taxes decreased $3.2$15.5 million, approximately 5%39%, in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to the same period in 20172018 due to higherlower taxable income, offset by a lower tax rate.income. The effective income tax rate was 25.8%25.1% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 compared to 38.8%25.8% for the same period last year, due to the reduction in the income tax rate due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary uses of cash are working capital requirements, capital expenditures, dividend payments, and debt service requirements. Additionally, from time to time, we may use cash for acquisitions and other investing and financing activities. Working capital is required principally to ensure we are able to run the business and have sufficient funds to satisfy maturing short-term debt and upcoming operational expenses. Our capital expenditures consist primarily of transportation equipment and information technology assets.technology.
Historically, our primary source of liquidity has been cash flow from operations. In addition, we have a $250$250.0 million revolving credit facility and a $200$200.0 million accounts receivable facility. We anticipate that cash generated from operations, together with amounts available under our credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet our requirements for the foreseeable future. To the extent additional funds are necessary to meet our long-term liquidity needs as we continue to execute our business strategy, we anticipate that these funds will be obtained through the incurrence of additional indebtedness, additional equity offerings, or a combination of these potential sources of funds. We intend to issue additional common shares under our shareholder-approved equity compensation plans to satisfy awards granted under those plans. Our ability to fund future operating expenses and capital expenditures, andas well as our ability to meet future debt service obligations or refinance our indebtedness will depend on our future operating performance, which will be affected by general economic, financial, and other factors beyond our control.
The following table presents our cash and debt outstanding as of the dates shown.
| | (in millions) | | September 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 359.8 |
| | $ | 238.5 |
| | $ | 377.7 |
| | $ | 378.7 |
|
Marketable securities | | 45.0 |
| | 41.6 |
| | 47.5 |
| | 51.3 |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities | | $ | 404.8 |
| | $ | 280.1 |
| | $ | 425.2 |
| | $ | 430.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Debt: | | | | | | | | |
Senior notes | | 400.0 |
| | 400.0 |
| | $ | 400.0 |
| | $ | 400.0 |
|
Equipment financing | | 15.4 |
| | 29.8 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 5.0 |
|
Capital leases | | 7.9 |
| | 10.8 |
| |
Finance leases | | | 5.9 |
| | 6.9 |
|
Total debt (1) | | $ | 423.3 |
| | $ | 440.6 |
| | $ | 408.6 |
| | $ | 411.9 |
|
| |
(1) | Debt on our consolidated balance sheets is presented net of deferred financing costs. |
Debt
At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, we were in compliance with all financial covenants and financial ratios under our credit agreements and the indentures governing our senior notes. See Note 6, 7, Debt and Credit Facilities, for information about our short-term and long-term financing arrangements.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, the changes to our cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities.
| | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Net cash provided by operating activities | Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 410.1 |
| | $ | 315.7 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 302.0 |
| | $ | 255.0 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | Net cash used in investing activities | | $ | (222.1 | ) | | $ | (295.3 | ) | Net cash used in investing activities | | (259.4 | ) | | (105.9 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | $ | (66.7 | ) | | $ | 51.0 |
| |
Net cash used in financing activities | | Net cash used in financing activities | | (43.6 | ) | | (53.9 | ) |
NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities increased $94.4$47.0 million, approximately 30%18%, in the first ninesix months of 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017,2018, driven primarily by the increasereclassification of proceeds from lease receipts from investing activities with the adoption of ASC 842 and the net change in working capital balances, partially offset by the decrease in net income as adjusted for noncash items and a net increase in working capital balances.non-cash items.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities decreased $73.2increased $153.5 million, approximately 25%145%, in the first ninesix months of 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018. The decreaseincrease in cash used was driven by lowerthe increase in net capital expenditures as well as increasedand the reclassification of proceeds from lease receipts to operating activities with the adoption of ASC 842, offset by increased sales of equipment and off-lease inventory.marketable securities.
Capital Expenditures
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our net capital expenditures.
| | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
(in millions) | (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Transportation equipment | Transportation equipment | | $ | 268.1 |
| | $ | 274.1 |
| Transportation equipment | | $ | 231.4 |
| | $ | 143.1 |
|
Other property and equipment | Other property and equipment | | 22.3 |
| | 27.3 |
| Other property and equipment | | 25.7 |
| | 14.4 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | (74.6 | ) | | (51.8 | ) | Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | (26.0 | ) | | (47.6 | ) |
Net capital expenditures | Net capital expenditures | | $ | 215.8 |
| | $ | 249.6 |
| Net capital expenditures | | $ | 231.1 |
| | $ | 109.9 |
|
Expenditures for transportation equipment and other property and equipment decreased $6.0increased $88.3 million and $5.0$11.3 million, respectively, in the first ninesix months of 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018 driven by increased tractor spend and capitalized IT costs. Proceeds from sale of property and equipment decreased $21.6 million primarily as a result of reduced tractor sales. See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, for information on our firm commitments to purchase transportation equipment.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities increased $117.7decreased $10.3 million, approximately 231%19%, in the first ninesix months of 20182019 compared to the same period in 2017.2018. The main driver of the increasedecrease in cash used was the period-over-period impact of the $340.6$11.5 million of net proceeds from our 2017 IPOdecrease in payments on debt and the $13.4finance lease obligations, partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in dividends paid in 2018, partially offset by the impact2019 compared to 2018.
Other Considerations that Could Affect Our Results, Liquidity, andor Capital Resources
Driver Capacity and Wage Cost
Our professional driver workforce is one of our most valuable assets. Recruiting and retaining sufficient numbers of qualified drivers is challenging in an increasingly competitive driver market and has a significant impact on our operating costs and ability to serve our customers. Changes in the demographic composition of the workforce, alternative employment opportunities that become available in the economy, and individual drivers’ desire to be home more frequently can affect availability of drivers and increase the wages our drivers require.
Factors that Could Result in a Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually using both the discounted cash flow method and the guideline public company method in calculating the fair values of our reporting units. Key inputs used in the discounted cash flow approach include growth rates for sales and operating profit, perpetuity growth assumptions, and discount rates. As interest rates rise, the calculated fair values of our reporting units will decrease, which could impact the results of our goodwill impairment tests.
We will perform our annual evaluation of goodwill for impairment as of October 31, 2018,2019, with such analysis expected to be finalized during the fourth quarter. As part of our annual process of updating our goodwill impairment evaluation, we will assess the impact of current operating results and our resulting management actions to determine whether they have an impact on the long-term valuation of reporting units and the related recoverability of our goodwill. A triggering event occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2019 that resulted in impairment of all goodwill related to our FTFM reporting unit. See further discussion in Note 6, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no arrangements that meet the definition of off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
See the disclosure under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Contractual Obligations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172018 for our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017.2018. There were no material changes to our contractual obligations during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We have reviewed our critical accounting policies and considered whether any new critical accounting estimates or other significant changes to our accounting policies require any additional disclosures. Other than the changes discussed below,We have found the disclosures made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172018 are still current.
Goodwill
As of December 31, 2017,current other than goodwill related to our reporting units with goodwill were Dedicated, Import/Export, and Asia. During the quarter ended June 30, 2018, we reorganized the structure of the operating segments within our Truckload reportable segment, separating FTFM into its own operating segment and integrating the remaining Dedicated business into the VTL operating segment. Each Truckload operating segment was determined to be its own reporting unit due to the level at which financial information is availablehas now been fully impaired. See Note 6, Goodwill and management's review of that information. As a result of the reorganization, goodwill previously attributed to the Dedicated reporting unit was reallocated to the VTL and FTFM reporting units on a relative fair value basis. Of the $138.2 million of Dedicated reporting unit goodwill, the VTL and FTFM reporting units were allocated $103.6 million and $34.6 million, respectively.
After the reallocation of goodwill, an impairment test was performed Other Intangible Assets for these reporting units, and it was determined that goodwill was not impaired as each reporting unit had an estimated fair value in excess of its respective carrying amount. The fair values of these reporting units exceeded their carrying values by over 25%. In the event that future operating performance of any of our reporting units is below our expectations, or there are changes to forecasted growth rates or our cost of capital, a decline in the fair value of the reporting units could result, and we may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge.additional discussion.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our market risks have not changed significantly from the market risks reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter covered by this report, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
As previously disclosed, in November 2016, we received a Finding and Notice of Violation from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) alleging that, among other matters, certain vehicles we own, hire, or lease failed to comply with certain provisions of the California Air Resources Board Truck and Bus Regulation, in violation of the Clean Air Act. After entering discussions with the EPA, we resolved the allegations during the second quarter of 2018 for an amount of $475,000.
For other information relating to legal proceedings, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table sets forth information regarding the purchases of our equity securities made by or on behalf of us or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 10b-18) during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018:2019:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2018 | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
July 1 – July 31 | | 13,391 |
| | $ | 28.13 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
August 1 – August 31 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
September 1 – September 30 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total * | | 13,391 |
| | 28.13 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
*All shares were surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon vesting of restricted stock. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2019 | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
April 1 - April 30 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
May 1 - May 31 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
June 1 - June 30 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Limitation Upon Payment of Dividends
The 2018 Credit Facility includes covenants limiting our ability to pay dividends or make distributions on our capital stock if a default exists under the 2018 Credit Facility or would be caused by giving effect to such dividend.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit Description |
| |
10.1 | | |
| | |
10.2 | | Joinder and Amendment No. 2, dated as of September 5, 2018, to Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement dated as of March 31, 2011, as amended as of December 17, 2013, among Schneider Receivables Corporation, as seller, Schneider National, Inc., as the servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the purchasers party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-38054) filed on September 6, 2018). |
31.1* | | |
| |
31.2* | | |
| |
32.1** | | |
| |
32.2** | | |
| |
101* | | Interactive Data File |
* Filed herewith.
** Furnished herewith.
+ Constitutes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant, Schneider National, Inc., has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| | |
| | SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC. |
| | |
Date: | November 2, 2018August 1, 2019 | /s/ Stephen L. Bruffett |
| | Stephen L. Bruffett |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| | (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |