UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One) 
ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended February 24, 201823, 2019
OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-38115

The Simply Good Foods Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
logo.jpg

Delaware 82-1038121
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
10501225 17th Street, Suite 15001000
Denver, CO 8026580202
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(303) 633-2840
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No☐
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ☐  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer Accelerated filerý
Non-accelerated filer
ý  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company
   Emerging growth companyý

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ý

As of April 5, 2018,March 22, 2019, there were 70,582,57381,915,423 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding.

The Simply Good Foods Company and Subsidiaries

THE SIMPLY GOOD FOODS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 24, 201823, 2019



INDEX
  Page
 
 
 
 
 


2



PartPART I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Simply Good Foods Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share data)
February 24, 2018 August 26, 2017 February 23, 2019 August 25, 2018
Assets(Successor) (Successor)    
Current assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$79,010
 $56,501
 $218,897
 $111,971
Accounts receivable, net41,355
 37,181
 45,318
 36,622
Inventories25,813
 29,062
 45,803
 30,001
Prepaid expenses4,025
 2,904
 2,448
 2,069
Other current assets11,294
 8,263
 6,671
 5,077
Total current assets161,497
 133,911
 319,137
 185,740

       
Long-term assets:       
Property and equipment, net2,289
 2,105
 2,874
 2,565
Intangible assets, net315,896
 319,148
 309,391
 312,643
Goodwill471,427
 465,030
 471,427
 471,427
Other long-term assets2,294
 2,294
 2,890
 2,230
Total assets$953,403
 $922,488
 $1,105,719
 $974,605

       
Liabilities and stockholders' equity       
Current liabilities:       
Accounts payable$12,322
 $14,859
 $17,247
 $11,158
Accrued interest547
 561
 2,531
 582
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities16,779
 15,042
 14,383
 15,875
Current portion of TRA liability3,017
 2,548
 
 2,320
Current maturities of long-term debt714
 234
 653
 648
Total current liabilities33,379
 33,244
 34,814
 30,583

       
Long-term liabilities:       
Long-term debt, less current maturities191,522
 191,856
 190,598
 190,935
Long-term portion of TRA liability24,273
 23,127
 
 25,148
Deferred income taxes52,517
 75,559
 62,930
 54,475
Other long-term liabilities 663
 863
Total liabilities301,691
 323,786
 289,005
 302,004
See commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

 

 

 


       
Stockholders' equity:       
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
 
 
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized, 70,582,573 and 70,562,477 issued and outstanding, respectively706
 706
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized, 81,915,213 and 70,605,675 issued and outstanding at February 23, 2019 and August 25, 2018, respectively 819
 706
Treasury stock, 6,729 and 0 shares at cost at February 23, 2019 and August 25, 2018, respectively (127) 
Additional paid-in-capital612,336
 610,138
 730,584
 614,399
Retained Earnings (accumulated deficit)39,451
 (12,161)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(781) 19
Retained earnings 86,273
 58,294
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (835) (798)
Total stockholders' equity651,712
 598,702
 816,714
 672,601
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$953,403
 $922,488
 $1,105,719
 $974,605
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

The Simply Good Foods Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Successor)  (Predecessor) (Successor)  (Predecessor) February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018 February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Net sales$109,347
  $102,308
 $215,934
  $202,111
 $123,800
 $109,347
 $244,731
 $215,934
Cost of goods sold59,090
  55,735
 112,920
  106,826
 66,166
 59,090
 127,986
 112,920
Gross profit50,257
  46,573
 103,014
  95,285
 57,634
 50,257
 116,745
 103,014
                 
Operating Expenses:         
Operating expenses:        
Distribution5,391
  4,960
 10,208
  9,329
 5,797
 5,391
 11,081
 10,208
Selling4,975
  3,978
 8,878
  8,271
 2,533
 4,975
 6,389
 8,878
Marketing10,056
  10,030
 19,906
  19,236
 12,196
 10,056
 23,659
 19,906
General and administrative12,711
  11,768
 24,790
  21,699
 15,855
 12,711
 29,724
 24,790
Depreciation and amortization1,948
  2,474
 3,882
  4,927
 1,939
 1,948
 3,825
 3,882
Business transaction costs1,877
  
 1,877
  
 290
 1,877
 1,329
 1,877
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability(3,668)  
 (3,026)  
Loss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability 
 (3,668) 533
 (3,026)
Other expense184
  58
 430
  58
 22
 184
 21
 430
Total operating expenses33,474
  33,268
 66,945
  63,520
 38,632
 33,474
 76,561
 66,945
                 
Income from operations16,783
  13,305
 36,069
  31,765
 19,002
 16,783
 40,184
 36,069
                 
Other income (expense):                 
Change in warrant liabilities
  (1,119) 
  (397)
Interest income 884
 
 1,665
 
Interest expense(3,093)  (6,566) (6,112)  (13,629) (3,344) (3,093) (6,605) (6,112)
Gain on settlement of TRA liability 
 
 1,534
 
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions601
  (108) 956
  (718) 130
 601
 (268) 956
Other income312
  22
 398
  199
 77
 312
 121
 398
Total other expense(2,180)  (7,771) (4,758)  (14,545) (2,253) (2,180) (3,553) (4,758)
                 
Income before income taxes14,603
  5,534
 31,311
  17,220
 16,749
 14,603
 36,631
 31,311
Income tax (benefit) expense(26,791)  2,071
 (20,301)  6,970
Income tax expense (benefit) 4,027
 (26,791) 8,652
 (20,301)
Net income$41,394
  $3,463
 $51,612
  $10,250
 $12,722
 $41,394
 $27,979
 $51,612
                 
Other comprehensive income:                 
Foreign currency translation adjustments(101)  113
 (800)  416
 (179) (101) (37) (800)
Comprehensive income$41,293
  $3,576
 $50,812
  $10,666
 $12,543
 $41,293
 $27,942
 $50,812
                 
Earnings per share from net income:                 
Basic$0.59
    $0.73
    $0.16
 $0.59
 $0.35
 $0.73
Diluted$0.56
    $0.71
    $0.15
 $0.56
 $0.33
 $0.71
Weighted average shares outstanding:                 
Basic70,582,573
    70,576,744
    81,900,352
 70,582,573
 79,595,330
 70,576,744
Diluted73,832,207
    72,605,705
    85,350,196
 73,832,207
 84,062,479
 72,605,705
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

The Simply Good Foods Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Successor)  (Predecessor) February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Operating activities        
Net income$51,612
  $10,250
 $27,979
 $51,612
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:    
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:    
Depreciation and amortization3,882
  4,927
 3,825
 3,882
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount645
  983
 668
 645
Stock compensation expense1,967
  1,063
 2,478
 1,967
Change in warrant liabilities
  397
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability(3,026)  
Unrealized (gain) loss on foreign currency transactions(956)  718
Loss (gain) on fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability 533
 (3,026)
Gain on settlement of TRA liability (1,534) 
Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions 268
 (956)
Deferred income taxes(23,398)  (1,369) 8,463
 (23,398)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment72
  
 6
 72
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable, net(4,672)  1,584
 (8,774) (4,672)
Inventories3,284
  6,474
 (15,855) 3,284
Prepaid expenses(909)  (51) (384) (909)
Other current assets(2,346)  (3,345) (2,092) (2,346)
Accounts payable(2,601)  (6,050) 6,143
 (2,601)
Accrued interest(15)  49
 1,949
 (15)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities1,726
  3,748
 (1,810) 1,726
Other86
  9
 (32) 86
Net cash provided by operating activities25,351
  19,387
 21,831
 25,351
        
Investing activities        
Purchases of property and equipment(886)  (284) (887) (886)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired(1,757)  (21,039) 
 (1,757)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,643)  (21,323) (887) (2,643)
        
Financing activities        
Proceeds from option exercises
  109
 361
 
Issuance of common stock (5) 
Cash received from warrant exercises231
  
 113,464
 231
Repurchase of common stock (127) 
Settlement of TRA liability (26,468) 
Principal payments of long-term debt(500)  (3,586) (1,000) (500)
Net cash used in financing activities(269)  (3,477)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 86,225
 (269)
    
Cash and cash equivalents        
Net increase (decrease) in cash22,439
  (5,413)
Net increase in cash 107,169
 22,439
Effect of exchange rate on cash70
  (162) (243) 70
    
Cash at beginning of period56,501
  78,492
 111,971
 56,501
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$79,010
  $72,917
 $218,897
 $79,010
    
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information    
Cash paid for interest $3,988
 $5,481
Cash paid for taxes $420
 $1,755

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information    
Cash paid for interest$5,481
  $12,444
Cash paid for taxes$1,755
  $1,710
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

The Simply Good Foods Company and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share data)

  Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Total
  Shares Amount Shares Amount    
Balance at August 25, 2018 70,605,675
 $706
 
 $
 $614,399
 $58,294
 $(798) $672,601
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 15,257
 
 15,257
Stock-based compensation 
 
 
 
 1,061
 
 
 1,061
Foreign currency translation adjustments 
 
 
 
 
 
 142
 142
Shares issued upon vesting of Restricted Stock Units 67,500
 1
 
 
 (1) 
 
 
Exercise of options to purchase common stock 4,444
 
 
 
 53
 
 
 53
Warrant conversion 11,200,299
 112
 
 
 113,352
 
 
 113,464
Balance at November 24, 2018 81,877,918
 $819
 
 $
 $728,864
 $73,551
 $(656) $802,578
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 12,722
 
 12,722
Stock-based compensation 
 
 
 
 1,417
 
 
 1,417
Repurchase of common stock 
 
 6,729
 (127) 
 
 
 (127)
Foreign currency translation adjustments 
 
 
 
 
 
 (179) (179)
Shares issued upon vesting of Restricted Stock Units 505
 
 
 
 (5) 
 
 (5)
Exercise of options to purchase common stock 36,790
 
 
 
 308
 
   308
Balance at February 23, 2019 81,915,213
 $819
 6,729
 $(127) $730,584
 $86,273
 $(835) $816,714

  Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings
(Accumulated Deficit)
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total
  Shares Amount Shares Amount    
Balance at August 26, 2017 70,562,477
 $706
 
 $
 $610,138
 $(12,161) $19
 $598,702
Net Income 
 
 
 
 
 10,218
 
 10,218
Stock compensation 
 
 
 
 1,068
 
 
 1,068
Foreign currency translation adjustments 
 
 
 
 
 
 (699) (699)
Warrant Conversion 20,096
 
 
 
 231
 
 
 231
Balance at November 25, 2017 70,582,573
 $706
 
 $
 $611,437
 $(1,943) $(680) $609,520
Net Income 
 
 
 
 
 41,394
 
 41,394
Stock compensation 
 
 
 
 899
 
 
 899
Foreign currency translation adjustments 
 
 
 
 
 
 (101) (101)
Balance at February 24, 2018 70,582,573
 $706
 
 $
 $612,336
 $39,451
 $(781) $651,712
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.


6


Table of Contents

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except for share and per share data)

1. Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation

Conyers Park Acquisition Corp (“Conyers Park”) was formed on April 20, 2016, as a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses.

The Simply Good Foods Company (“Simply Good Foods”), was formed by Conyers Park on March 30, 2017. On April 10, 2017, Conyers Park and NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (“Atkins”) announced that they entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”). On, pursuant to which on July 7, 2017, (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Conyers Park merged into Simply Good Foods, which also acquired Atkins.Atkins pursuant to the Merger Agreement. As a result, both entities became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Simply Good Foods (the "Business Combination"). Simply Good Foods was listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMPL” upon the consummation of the Business Combination. Atkins was formerly owned by Roark Capital Management, LLC (“Roark”).

The Business Combination resulted in Conyers Park controlling the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of the combined entity. As a result, for accounting purposes,The common stock of Simply Good Foods is listed on the acquirer andNasdaq Capital Market under the accounting “successor” in the Business Combination while Atkins is the acquiree and accounting “predecessor”. Our financial statement presentation includes the financial statements of Atkins as “predecessor” for all periods prior to the Closing Date and of Simply Good Foods, including the consolidation of Atkins, for periods after the Closing Date. See Note 3 for a detailed discussion of the Business Combination.symbol “SMPL.”
 
Unless the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer, for periods prior to the completion of the Business Combination, to Atkins and its subsidiaries, and, for periods upon or after the completion of the Business Combination, to Simply Good Foods and its subsidiaries.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated ineliminated. Unless the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). context otherwise requires, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to Simply Good Foods and its subsidiaries.

The Company maintains its accounting records on a 52/53-week fiscal year.

The financial information presented within our consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The accompanying financial statements include condensed consolidated balance sheet information for the successor entity ended February 24, 2018 and August 26, 2017. The remaining financial statements include the successor thirteen week period, and twenty-six week period ended February 24, 2018 and the predecessor thirteen week and twenty-six week period ended February 25, 2017.

Description of Business

Simply Good Foods operates in the healthy snacking category. The Atkins® brand focuses on an approach to eating that advocates reduced levels of refined carbohydrates and refined sugars, and encourages the consumption of lean protein, fiber, fruits, vegetables, and good fats. The Company sells a variety of nutrition bars, Ready to Drink ("RTD"(“RTD”) shakes, snacks and confectionery products designed around the nutrition principles of the Atkins eating approach. In addition to snacking products, we have granted a license for frozen meals sold in the United States.

Seasonality

The Company has experienced in the past, and expects to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in sales as a result of consumer spending patterns. Historically, sales have been greatest in the first calendarsecond fiscal quarter as the Company sells product to retail locations, which sell to consumers in the second fiscal quarter, primarily driven by the post-holiday resolution season. The Company has also seen minimalsome seasonality in the summer and back-to-school shopping seasons in the third and fourth fiscal quarters, respectively.each year. The period of the lowest sales has historically been in the fourth fiscal quarter. The Company believes these consumer spending patterns are driven primarily by the predisposition of consumers to adjust their approach to nutrition at certain times of the year as well as the timing of the Company’s advertising linked with key customer promotion windows.


6


Table of Contents

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes (“Interim Statements”) of the Company and its subsidiaries are unaudited. InThe condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and the opinionrules and regulations of management,the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) and disclosures which are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included.the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the indicated periods. All such adjustments were of a normal and recurring nature. The results reported in these Interim Statementsinterim condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year. These Interim Statementsyear and should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2017,25, 2018, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), filed on November 9, 2017.October 24, 2018. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements and, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP have been condensed or omitted.


7


Table of Contents

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report for a description of criticalsignificant accounting policies.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law. The change in the tax law will be partially effective in the current 2018 fiscal year and fully effective in the 2019 fiscal year. The primary impacts to the Company include repeal of the alternative minimum tax regime, decrease of the corporate income tax rate structure, and net operating loss limitations. These changes will have a material impact to the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities, the value of the Company’s Tax Receivable Agreement (the “TRA”), and the Company’s future taxable income and effective tax rate. Refer to Note 7, Income Taxes, below for further information regarding the recently issued law.

Other than the Tax Act, there have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies since August 26, 2017.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers(ASC Topic 606). The objective of ASU No. 2014-09 is to outline a new, single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis for determining when and how revenue is recognized, depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015,The Company adopted the FASB voted to delay the implementationrequirements of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. An entity may elect to early adopt as of the original effective date, fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing which provides additional clarification regarding identifying performance obligations and licensing. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-19, 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements toASC Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. These ASUs will replace most existing revenue recognition guidanceand all related requirements using the modified retrospective method in GAAP and, duethe first quarter of fiscal 2019. Upon completing our assessment of ASC Topic 606, we concluded that no adjustments were required to the Business Combination, will be effective foropening balance of retained earnings at the Company beginning in fiscal 2019.date of adoption and the comparative information has not been restated. The standard permits the useadoption of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method.
The updated guidance requires companies to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company is currently evaluating recently issued guidance against contracts with key customers. The Company believes the key changes in the standard that impact revenue recognition relate to the recognition of customer programs and incentive offerings, including special pricing agreements, price protection, promotion, and other volume-based incentives. Based on our preliminary review, we dothis ASU did not expect adoption to have a material impact on ourthe Company's consolidated financial statements but further work to substantiate this preliminary conclusion is underway. We will determine the transition method to apply and the implications of using either the full retrospective or modified retrospective approach after this additional work is concluded.statements. Disclosures required by ASC Topic 606 are presented within Note 3, Revenue Recognition.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments-OverallInstruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10). This new standard enhances the reporting model for financial instruments regarding certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. This ASU is to be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet

7


Table of Contents

as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. This ASU is effective for the Company’s August 2019 fiscal year end. The Company does not anticipateadopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this ASU willdid not have a material impact to itson the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842):Targeted Improvements. ASU 2018-11 provides entities another option for transition, allowing entities to not apply the new standard in the comparative periods they present in their financial statements in the year of adoption. The new guidance is effectiveamendments provide the option for the Company beginning in fiscal 2020. The amendments shouldASU to be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the effects adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.statements, however, a material increase in lease-related assets and liabilities is expected.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new guidance is intended to eliminate diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. This ASU is effective for the Company’s August 2019 fiscal year end. The Company does not anticipateadopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this ASU willdid not have a material impact on itsthe Company's consolidated statements of cash flows.financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Intangibles—Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The standard simplifies how an entity tests goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amended standard also modifies the concept of impairment from the condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value to the condition that exists when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2020. Early adoptionThe Company is permitted for interim or annualcurrently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.testing.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The provisions of this ASU provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business by clarifying the requirements related to inputs, processes, and outputs. These provisions are to be applied prospectively and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. This ASU is effective for the Company’s 2019 fiscal year end. The Company does not anticipateadopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this ASU to bedid not have a material to itsimpact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The amended standard specifies the modification accounting applicable to any entity which changes the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The new guidance is effective for all entities after December 2017. Early adoption is permitted.Company adopted this ASU in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The Company does not anticipate adoption of this ASU to bedid not have a material to itsimpact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

3. Business Combination
Acquisition of Atkins
Upon the consummation of the Business Combination, and through a number of sub-mergers discussed in Note 1 above, Conyers Park merged into Simply Good Foods which subsequently acquired, and obtained control over Atkins. As a result of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods is the acquirer for accounting purposes, and Atkins is the acquiree and accounting predecessor. The Company’s financial statement presentation distinguishes a “Predecessor” for Atkins for periods prior to the Closing Date. The Company is the “Successor” for periods after the Closing Date, which includes consolidation of Atkins subsequent to the Business Combination. The Merger was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting, and the Successor financial statements reflect a new basis of accounting that is based on the fair value of the net assets acquired. The historical financial information of Conyers Park, prior to the Business Combination, are not reflected in the Predecessor financial statements as those amounts are considered de-minimis. The financial statements of Conyers Park are included in the post-merger Successor entity, which includes balance sheet and equity items of Conyers Park assumed by Simply Good Foods through the transaction. As a result of the application of the acquisition method of accounting as of the Closing Date, the financial statements for the Predecessor period and for the Successor period are presented on a different basis of accounting and are therefore not comparable.

8


Table of Contents

The Business Combination is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values, as determined in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, as of the Closing Date. Consistent with the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Atkins have been recorded at their respective fair values and added to those of Conyers Park. ASC 805 establishes a measurement period to provide the Company with a reasonable amount of time to obtain the information necessary to identify and measure various items in a business combination and cannot extend beyond one year from the acquisition date.
The Business Combination was funded by Conyers Park through a combination of cash, stock, and debt financing. Cash sources of funding included $404.0 million of cash held in Conyers Park’s trust account, $100.0 million from private placement equity issuance, $200.0 million in new term loan debt, and $0.2 million of cash on hand at Conyers Park. Upon the close of the transaction, a total of $8.1 million was paid in debt issuance costs related to the new term loan, $8.1 million was paid in deferred equity issuance costs related to the original IPO of Conyers Park, $3.0 million was paid related to the private placement equity issuance costs, and $12.4 million of cash was paid in acquisition-related transaction costs incurred by Conyers Park. As an integrated part of the closing of the Business Combination, $284.0 million of cash was paid to retire the predecessor long-term debt of Atkins. The acquisition-related transaction costs incurred by Conyers Park are reflected within the opening accumulated deficit within the Simply Good Foods consolidated statement of stockholder’s equity. In the first quarter of fiscal 2018, per the terms of the Merger Agreement, Simply Good Foods paid a working capital adjustment of $1.8 million to the former owners of Atkins which resulted in an increase to the previously recognized Goodwill.

In connection with this change in control, the assets and liabilities of Atkins were recorded at their respective fair value on the closing date by application of the acquisition method of accounting as prescribed by ASC 805 and ASC 820. Upon the completion of the purchase accounting as of the close of the transaction, Roark received approximately $821.6 million in total consideration. A total of $673.8 million of cash consideration was paid to acquire Atkins. The total consideration is inclusive of 10.2 million shares of common stock of Simply Good Foods valued at $11.47 per share or $117.6 million in equity consideration at fair value. Roark is also entitled to future cash payments pursuant to the TRA which had a preliminary estimated fair value of $25.7 million as of the close of the Business Combination, as disclosed in the Annual Report. During the second quarter we completed the valuation of the TRA. The finalized TRA resulted in incremental contingent consideration of $4.6 million, the inclusion of which increased the initial fair value of TRA consideration to $30.3 million. The increase in consideration also increased Goodwill $4.6 million to $471.4 million. The TRA obligation is recorded at fair value and classified as a liability. The TRA generally provides for the payment by Simply Good Foods to Roark for certain federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax benefits deemed realized in post-closing taxable periods by Simply Good Foods, Conyers Park, Atkins and Atkins’ eligible subsidiaries from the use of up to $100 million of the following tax attributes: (i) net operating losses available to be carried forward as of the closing of the Business Combination; (ii) certain deductions generated by the consummation of the business transaction; and (iii) remaining depreciable tax basis from the 2003 acquisition of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. The TRA is contingent consideration and subsequent changes in fair value of the contingent liability will be recognized in earnings. As of February 24, 2018, the estimated fair value of these prospective contingent payments is $27.3 million which has been recorded as a liability and represents 100% of the value of the recorded tax attributes (refer to Note 7, Income Taxes, for additional discussion on the TRA).

As disclosed in the Annual Report, the predecessor financial statements of historical Atkins’ included business combination related seller costs of $2.0 million related to legal costs, $8.6 million of contingent success fees to an investment banker providing advisory services triggered by the transaction, and $13.8 million of contingent change-in-control bonuses. These seller costs were incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and were recorded within business combination transaction costs within the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as disclosed in the Annual Report.

The following summarizes the fair value of the Business Combination.
(In thousands) 
Cash paid$673,763
Equity consideration paid to selling equity holders (1)117,567
Total cash and equity consideration791,330
TRA payable to selling equity holders30,315
Total consideration$821,645


9


Table of Contents

(1) Equity consideration paid is summarized below:
(In thousands, except equity per share data) 
Shares of Simply Good Foods paid to former equity holders of Atkins10,250
Fair Value of SMPL equity per share$11.47
Equity consideration paid$117,567

The fair value of these units was determined as follows:
Per share price based on the market price on the day of the close$11.47

The Company has recorded the final allocation of the purchase price to Predecessor’s tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair values as of the closing date. The July 7, 2017 fair value is as follows (in thousands):
Assets acquired: 
Cash and cash equivalents$71,181
Accounts receivable, net31,507
Inventories33,023
Prepaid assets1,781
Other current assets13,466
Property and equipment, net1,793
Intangible assets, net (1) 
320,000
Other long-term assets2,224
Liabilities assumed: 
Accounts payable(12,187)
Other current liabilities(36,498)
Deferred income taxes(2)
(76,072)
Total identifiable net assets350,218
Goodwill(1)(3)
471,427
Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed$821,645

(1) Goodwill and intangible assets were recorded at fair value consistent with ASC 820 as a result of the Business Combination. Intangible assets consist of brands and trademarks, customer relationships, proprietary recipes and formulas and licensing agreements. The useful lives of the intangible assets are disclosed in Note 4. The fair value measurement of the assets and liabilities was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value measurement hierarchy. Level 3 fair market values were determined using a variety of information, including estimated future cash flows, appraisals, and market comparable data and companies.

(2) As a result of the increase in the fair value of the intangible asset the deferred income taxes were stepped-up by $50.7 million.

(3)Amounts recorded for goodwill are generally not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.


10


Table of Contents

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information3. Revenue Recognition

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. The singular performance obligation of our customer contracts is determined by each individual purchase order and the products ordered, with revenue being recognized at a point-in-time when the obligation under the terms of the agreement is satisfied and product control is transferred to the customer. Specifically, control transfers to our customers when the product is delivered to or picked up by our customers based on applicable shipping terms. The performance obligations of our customer contracts are generally satisfied within 30 days.

Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for fulfilled product orders including estimates of variable consideration. The most common forms of variable consideration include trade programs, consumer incentives, coupon redemptions, allowances for unsaleable products, and any additional amounts where a distinct good or service cannot be identified or the value cannot be reasonably estimated. Estimates of variable consideration are made using various information including historical data on performance of similar trade promotional activities, as well as the Company's best estimate of current activity. We review these estimates regularly and make revisions as necessary. Revisions can include changes for consideration paid to customers that lack sufficient evidence to support a distinct good or service assertion, or for which a reasonably estimable fair value cannot be determined, primarily related to our assessments of cooperative advertising programs. Uncertainties related to the estimate of variable consideration are resolved in a short time frame and do not require any additional constraint on variable consideration. Adjustments to variable consideration are recognized in the period the adjustments are identified and have historically been insignificant. Revenue is recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
We provide standard assurance type warranties that our products will comply with all agreed-upon specifications. No services beyond an assurance type warranty are provided to our customers. While customers generally have a right to return defective or non-conforming products, past experience has demonstrated that product returns have been immaterial. Customer remedies for defective or non-conforming products may include a refund or exchange. As a result, the right of return is estimated and recorded as a reduction in revenue, if necessary.

Our customer contracts identify product quantity, price and payment terms. Payment terms are granted consistent with industry standards. Although some payment terms may be more extended, the majority of our payment terms are less than 60 days. As a result, we do not adjust our revenues for the effects of a significant financing component. Amounts billed and due from our customers are classified as accounts receivable on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company utilizes third-party contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our products. We have evaluated whether the Company is the principal or agent in these relationships. We have determined that the Company is the principal in all cases, as it maintains the responsibility for fulfillment, risk of loss and establishes the price.

We recognize a minor amount of royalty income for the license of Atkins' frozen meals. Royalty income represents less than 1% of the Company's net sales. Royalty revenue is recognized over time as sales of licensed products occur.

The Company has elected the following unaudited pro forma combined financial informationpractical expedients in accordance with ASC Topic 606:

Shipping and handling costs—We have elected to account for shipping and handling costs incurred to deliver products to customers as fulfillment activities, rather than a promised service. As such, fulfillment costs are included in Distribution in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

Costs of obtaining a contract—We have elected expense costs of obtaining a contract because the amortization period would be less than one year.

Revenues from transactions with external customers for each of Atkins’ products would be impracticable to disclose and management does not view its business by product line. The following table presents combined results of Conyers Park and Atkins as if the Business Combination had occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2017:our revenue disaggregated by geographic area.
  13-weeks ended 26-weeks ended
  February 25, 2017 February 25, 2017
Revenue $102,308
 $202,111
Gross profit $46,573
 $95,285
Net income $6,305
 $15,324
These pro forma combined results include certain adjustments, primarily due to decreases in amortization expense due to the changes in useful lives of intangible assets and decreases in interest expense due to the refinancing of Atkins debt. The pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined entity that would have been reported had the Business Combination been completed at the beginning of fiscal year 2017, nor is it representative of future operating results of the Company.
  Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(In thousands) February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018 February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Net sales        
North America $117,946
 $102,609
 $232,552
 $202,143
International 5,854
 6,738
 12,179
 13,791
Total $123,800
 $109,347
 $244,731
 $215,934


9


Table of Contents

4. Goodwill and Intangibles
The following table presents the changes in goodwill:
 Total
Balance, August 26, 2017 (Successor)$465,030
Goodwill working capital adjustment1,757
Measurement period adjustment of the Business Combination4,640
Balance as of February 24, 2018 (Successor)$471,427

Changes in the Company’s Goodwill from August 26, 2017 to February 24, 2018 resulted from the finalization of the acquisition method of accounting as described in Note 3 above. There were no impairment charges relatedchanges to goodwill during these periods or since the inception of the Company.twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019.

Intangible assets, net in our condensed consolidated balance sheetsCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following:
Successor   February 24, 2018
  Useful life Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:        
Brands and trademarks Indefinite life $232,000
 $
 $232,000
Intangible assets with finite lives:   

 

 

Customer relationships 15 years 59,000
 2,482
 56,518
Proprietary recipes and formulas 7 years 7,000
 631
 6,369
Licensing agreements 14 years 22,000
 991
 21,009
    $320,000
 $4,104
 $315,896

11


Table of Contents

    February 23, 2019
(In thousands) Useful life Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:        
Brands and trademarks Indefinite life $232,000
 $
 $232,000
Intangible assets with finite lives:   

 

 

Customer relationships 15 years 59,000
 6,415
 52,585
Proprietary recipes and formulas 7 years 7,000
 1,631
 5,369
Licensing agreements 14 years 22,000
 2,563
 19,437
    $320,000
 $10,609
 $309,391
Successor August 26, 2017
 Useful life Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Net carrying amount August 25, 2018
(In thousands) Useful life Gross carrying amount Accumulated amortization Net carrying amount
Intangible assets with indefinite life:                
Brands and trademarks Indefinite life $232,000
 $
 $232,000
 Indefinite life $232,000
 $
 $232,000
Intangible assets with finite lives:            
Customer relationships 15 years 59,000
 515
 58,485
 15 years 59,000
 4,448
 54,552
Proprietary recipes and formulas 7 years 7,000
 131
 6,869
 7 years 7,000
 1,131
 5,869
Licensing agreements 14 years 22,000
 206
 21,794
 14 years 22,000
 1,778
 20,222
 $320,000
 $852
 $319,148
 $320,000
 $7,357
 $312,643

Intangible assets, net changed due to regular amortization expense. Amortization expensesexpense related to intangible assets during the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 201823, 2019 and February 25, 201724, 2018 were $1.6 million and $2.2$1.6 million, respectively. Amortization expensesexpense related to intangible assets during the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 201823, 2019 and February 25, 201724, 2018 were $3.3 million and $4.4$3.3 million, respectively.
Estimated future amortization for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter is as follows:
(In thousands by fiscal year)    
Remainder of 2018 $3,253
2019 6,505
Remainder of 2019 $3,253
2020 6,505
 6,505
2021 6,505
 6,505
2022 6,505
 6,505
2023 and thereafter 54,623
2023 6,505
2024 and thereafter 48,118
Total $77,391

5. Long-Term Debt and Line of Credit

On July 7, 2017, the Company entered into a Credit Agreementcredit agreement with Barclays Bank PLC and other parties.parties (the "Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a term facility of $200.0 million (“Term Facility”) with a seven year maturity and (ii) a revolving credit facility of up to $75.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a five year maturity, in each case under the first lien senior secured loan facilities (the “First Lien”).maturity. Substantially concurrent with the consummation of the Business Combination, the full $200.0 million of the first lien term loanTerm Facility (the “Term Loan”) was drawn, and no revolving loans were drawn. The interest rate per annum is based on either (i) a base rate equaling the higher of (a) the “prime rate”, (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (c) the Euro-currency rate applicable for an interest period of one month plus 1.00% plus (x) 3.00% margin for the Term Loan or (y) 2.00% margin for the Revolving Credit Facility, or (ii) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) adjusted for statutory reserve requirements, plus (x) 4.00% margin for the Term Loan and is subject to a floor of 1.00% or (y) 3.00% margin for the Revolving Credit Facility. The applicable margin for Revolving Credit Facility will be adjusted after the completion of the Company’s first full fiscal quarter after the closing of the Business Combination based upon the Company’s consolidated first lien net leverage ratio. As security for the payment or performance of its debt, the Company has pledged certain equity interests in its subsidiaries.
The First Lien is subject

10


Table of Contents

On March 16, 2018 (the “Amendment Date”), the Company entered into an amendment (the “Repricing Amendment”) to mandatory prepayments basedthe Credit Agreement. As a result of the Repricing Amendment, the interest rate on contractual terms. With respect to the Term Loan priorwas reduced and, as of the Amendment Date, such loans bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company's option, either LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 3.50% or a base rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. The Repricing Amendment did not change the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility will continue to bear interest based upon the Company's consolidated net leverage ratio as of the last financial statements delivered to the six-month anniversary of the Closing Date, a 1.00% prepayment premium is payableadministrative agent. No additional debt was incurred, or any proceeds received, by the Company in connection with certain repricing events.the Repricing Amendment. The Company may also voluntarily prepay outstanding loans at any time.incremental fees paid to the administrative agent are reflected as additional debt discount and are amortized over the terms of the long-term financing agreements using the effective-interest method.

The credit facilities governing our debt arrangements containCredit Agreement contains certain financial and other covenants. The revolving credit facility has a maximum total net leverage ratio equal to or less than 6.25:1.00 (with a reduction to 6.00:1.00 on and after the third anniversary of the closing date of the credit facilities) contingent on credit extensions in excess of 30% of the total amount of commitments available under the revolving credit facility, and limitations oncovenants that limit our ability to, among other things, incur and/or undertake asset sales and other dispositions, liens, indebtedness, certain acquisitions and investments, consolidations, mergers, reorganizations and other fundamental changes, payment of dividends and other distributions to equity and warrant holders, and prepayments of material subordinated debt, in each case, subject to customary exceptions materially consistent with credit facilities of such type and size. The Revolving Credit Facility has a maximum total net leverage ratio equal to or less than 6.25:1.00 (with a reduction to 6.00:1.00 on and after the third anniversary of the closing date of the Credit Agreement) contingent on credit extensions in excess of 30% of the total amount of commitments available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Any failure to comply with the restrictions of the credit facilitiesCredit Agreement may result in an event of default. The credit facilities governing our debt arrangements bear interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase, variable rate debt will create higher debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our cash flow. AsCompany was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Company has not drawn on the revolving credit facilityCredit Agreement as of February 24, 2018,23, 2019 and August 26, 2017, no debt covenants were applicable as of the period then ended.

12


Table of Contents

As of February 24, 2018, the Company’s only outstanding long-term debt is the Term Loan maturing on July 7, 2024.25, 2018.

At February 24, 201823, 2019 and August 26, 2017,25, 2018, there were no amounts drawn against the Revolving Credit Facility or lines of credit, and long-termFacility. Long-term debt consists of the following:
 February 24, 2018  August 26, 2017
 (Successor)  (Successor)
Term Loan$199,500
  $200,000
Less: Deferred Financing Fees7,264
  7,910
Total Debt192,236
  192,090
Less: Current maturities, net of deferred financing fees of $1.3 million at February 24, 2018 and August 26, 2017, respectively714
  234
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing fees$191,522
  $191,856
(In thousands) February 23, 2019 August 25, 2018
Term Loan $197,500
 $198,500
Less: Deferred financing fees 6,249
 6,917
Total debt 191,251
 191,583
Less: Current maturities, net of deferred financing fees of $1.3 million at February 23, 2019 and $1.4 million at August 25, 2018, respectively 653
 648
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing fees $190,598
 $190,935

The Company will be required to make principal payments of $2.0 million over the next twelve months.

The Company utilizes market approaches to estimate the fair value of certain outstanding borrowings by discounting anticipated future cash flows derived from the contractual terms of the obligations and observable market interest and foreign exchange rates. The Company carries debt at historical cost and discloses fair value. As of February 23, 2019 and August 26, 2017 and February 24,25, 2018, the book value of the Company’s debt approximated fair value. All term debtThe estimated fair value of the Term Loan is valued based on observable inputs and classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

As described in Note 14, Subsequent Events, the Term Loan was amended on March 16, 2018.

6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measurements, a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies, is as follows:

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.

The following tables settable sets forth the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value. The fair value and fair value inputs of the TRA is discussed in Note 7.

Fair value at February 24,August 25, 2018 is summarized as follows:
Successor Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Liabilities        
TRA liability $
 $
 $27,290
 $27,290

Fair value at August 26, 2017 is summarized as follows:
Successor Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
(In thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Liabilities                
TRA liability $
 $
 $25,675
 $25,675
 $
 $
 $27,468
 $27,468

1311


Table of Contents


For the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended February 24, 2018, a benefitA gain of $3.7 million and $3.0 million was charged to the GainLoss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability infor the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income respectively. The benefit isthirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 primarily due to the impacts of the change in tax law. A loss of $0.5 million and a gain of $3.0 million were charged to the Loss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability for the federal tax rates astwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018, respectively. The Company settled the Income Tax Receivable Agreement (the "TRA") during the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019, which resulted in a $1.5 million gain. Following the settlement of the TRA liability, the Company did not have any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities. The settlement of the TRA liability is discussed in Note 7.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value as of February 23, 2019 and August 25, 2018 due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

7. Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law. The change in the tax law iswas partially effective in our currentthe 2018 fiscal year and will beis fully effective in ourthe 2019 fiscal year. The Tax Act, among other things, reduces the top U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, and creates new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings.

Due to the complexities involved in accounting for the Tax Act, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission'sSEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 requires that the Company include in its financial statements the reasonable estimate of the impact of the Tax Act on earnings to the extent such reasonable estimate has been determined. The Company is allowed a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. As of February 24,August 25, 2018, we havehad not completed our accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Tax Act; however, as described below, we have made a reasonable estimate of the effects on our existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax and have recorded provisional amounts. In other cases, we have not been able to make a reasonable estimate and continue to account for those items based on our existing accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes, and the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to enactment. For the items for which we were able to determine a reasonable estimate, we recognized a provisional gain of $29.0$31.0 million which is included as a component of Income tax (benefit) expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

Provisional Amountsfiscal year 2018.

The Tax Act reducesFASB released guidance on the corporate federalaccounting for tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. We have recorded a provisional decrease to our deferred tax liabilities, net, with a corresponding net adjustment to deferredon the global intangible low-taxed income tax benefit of $29.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. While we are able to make a reasonable estimate(“GILTI”) provisions of the impact ofTax Act. The guidance indicates that either treating taxes on GILTI inclusions as current period costs, or accounting for deferred taxes on GILTI inclusions are both acceptable subject to an accounting policy election. The Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost in the reduction in corporate rate, it may be affected by other analyses related to the Tax Act, including, but not limited to, our calculation of deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income and the state tax effect of adjustments made to federal temporary differences.year incurred.

Deemed Repatriation Transition Tax: The one-time transition tax is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P) that we previously deferred from USU.S. income taxes. We recorded immaterial provisional amounts in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 for our one-time transition tax liability for of our foreign subsidiaries, resulting in an immaterial increase in income tax expense. On the basis of revised E&P and cash balance computations that were completed during the reporting period we adjusted our Transition Tax estimate and recorded an immaterial increase in income tax expense in the second quarter.

Reduction of U.S. federal income tax rate: The Tax Act reduced the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. We have not yet completed our calculationwere able to reasonably estimate the effect of the total post-1986 E&Preduction in the tax rate on our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities and in fiscal 2018, we recorded a net provisional reduction in our deferred income tax liabilities of $31.0 million with a corresponding net adjustment of $31.0 million of deferred income tax benefit at August 25, 2018. No changes have been made to these adjustments during 2019.

Our accounting for these foreign subsidiaries. Further, the transition tax is based in part on the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets. This amount may change when we finalize the calculation of post-1986 foreign E&P previously deferred from U.S. federal taxation and finalize the amounts held in cash or other specified assets. We are continuing to gather additional information to more precisely compute the amountimpact of the transition tax.Tax Act is now complete.

Effective Tax Rate

The following table shows the tax expense and the effective tax rate for the twenty-six week periodweeks ended February 24, 201823, 2019 and February 25, 201724, 2018 resulting from operations:
 February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
 (Successor)  (Predecessor)
(In thousands) February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Income before income taxes $31,311
  $17,220
 $36,631
 $31,311
Provision for income taxes $(20,301)  $6,970
Provision (benefit) for income taxes $8,652
 $(20,301)
Effective tax rate (64.8)%  40.5% 23.6% (64.8)%

The effective tax rate for the twenty-six week period ended February 24, 201823, 2019 is lowerhigher than the effective tax rate for the twenty-six week period ended February 25, 201724, 2018 by 105.3%88.4%, which is primarily driven by the change in the tax law due to the Tax Act, and also by the provisional gainone-time impact of $29.0 million recorded during the period.settlement of the TRA in the first quarter of fiscal 2019.


1412



Tax Receivable Agreement

Concurrent with the Business Combination, the Company entered into the TRA with the historical shareholders of Atkins. The TRA entered into by the CompanyAtkins in consideration for the Business Combination isCombination. The TRA was valued based on the future expected payments under the terms of the agreement (see Note 3). As more fully described in theagreement. The TRA the TRA generally providesprovided for the payment by Simply Good Foods to the Atkins’ selling equity holders for certain federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax benefits deemed realized in post-closing taxable periods by Simply Good Foods, Conyers Park, Atkins and Atkins’ eligible subsidiaries from the use of up to $100$100.0 million of the following tax attributes: (i) net operating losses available to be carried forward as of the closing of the Business Combination;Combination, (ii) certain deductions generated by the consummation of the business transaction;transaction, and (iii) remaining depreciable tax basis from the 2003 acquisition of Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. In addition, Simply Good Foods will pay

During the thirteen weeks ended November 24, 2018, the Company entered into a termination agreement (the "Termination Agreement") with Atkins selling equity holders forHoldings, LLC and Roark Capital Acquisition, LLC. Pursuant to the use of 75% of upTermination Agreement, the Company paid $26.5 million to $7.6 million of alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards. Thesettle the TRA is contingent consideration and subsequent changes in fair valuefull. Under the Termination Agreement, each of the contingent liability will be recognized in earnings.
parties thereto agreed to terminate the TRA and to release any and all obligations and liabilities of the other parties thereunder effective as of the receipt of the termination payment. The Company re-measuredrecorded a $0.5 million loss on the TRA due to the Tax Act which changed federal tax law. The Tax Act resulted in a decrease to the top U.S. Corporate tax rate, as well as other regime changes including the repeal of the alternative minimum tax for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The assessment of these changes resulted in provisional one-time gain of $4.7 million, charged to the Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. As of February 24, 2018, the estimated fair value of these contingent payments is $27.3 million, which has been recorded as a liability and represents 100% of the value of the recorded tax attributes.
Estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the TRA is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors. The actual increase in tax basis and deductions, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

The amount and timing of the Company’s income - The Company is required to pay 100% of the deemed benefits as and when deemed realized. As such, the Company is generally not required to make payments under the TRA until and unless a tax benefit is actually realized on a filed return. Without income against which specified TRA attributes are deductible, the benefit of such deduction is not deemed to be realized, resulting in no payment under the TRA. The utilization of such tax attributes and recognition of benefit against Company income will result in payments under the TRA.

The amount and timing of deductions - Similar to the above, the timing of the recognition of deductions and attributes included in the TRA will impactliability through the ultimate timingsettlement on November 14, 2018 and recognized a gain of payments under$1.5 million in connection with the TRA. In turn, the fair valueexecution of the TRA payments will fluctuate over time;Termination Agreement and
Future tax rates of jurisdictions in which the Company has tax liability, including the finalization of the assessment of the impact of the Tax Act.

The TRA assumptions were re-measured for subsequent inputs based on the enacted tax rates under the Tax Act, signed into law on December 22, 2017. The significant fair value inputs used to estimate the future expected TRA payments to Roark include the timing of tax payments due to the assessment of the Tax Act, a tax savings rate of approximately 29.2% post-Tax Act enactment, a discount rate of approximately 9%, book income projections, timing of expected adjustments to calculate taxable income, and the projected rate of use for attributes defined in the TRA. The TRA fair value requires significant judgment and is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy assessment included in Note 6, and the fair value of the instrument may change upon the assessment of the Tax Act.

Payments made under the TRA are generally due within 90 days following the filing of Simply Good Foods U.S. federal and state income tax returns, and may include the tax returns that reflect activity as early as the taxable year ended August 26, 2017. Payments under the TRA will be based on the tax reporting positions that Simply Good Foods will determine. The term of the TRA generally will continue until all applicable tax benefit payments have been made under the agreement.

15



As of February 24, 2018, the un-discounted future expected payments under the TRA are as follows:
(In thousands by fiscal year) 
Estimated
future payments
2018 $2,637
2019 16,027
2020 11,728
2021 1,595
2022 183
2023 and thereafter 106
  $32,276
final cash payment.

8. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company has non-cancellable operating leases for ninesix buildings. For the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018, and February 25, 2017, rent expenses for the successor entity were $0.6$0.5 million and for the predecessor entity were $0.3$0.6 million, respectively. For the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018, and February 25, 2017, rent expenses for the successor entity were $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Rent expenses are included in General and foradministrative in the predecessor entity were $0.9 million, respectively.Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

Litigation

From time to time, the Company has been and may again become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company is not presently a party to certainany litigation that it believes to be material and claimsthe Company is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against it that are considered normal to the operations of the business. Management is of the opinion that the outcome of these actions will notit believes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidatedits business, operating results, financial statements.condition or cash flows.
Tax Receivable Agreement
Refer to Note 7 for detail on the TRA, which was contingent consideration at the time of the Business Combination.
Other

The Company has entered into endorsement contracts with certain celebrity figures to promote and endorse the Atkins brand and line of products. These contracts contain endorsement fees, which are expensed ratably over the life of the contract, and performance fees, that are recognized at the time of achievement. Based on the terms of the contracts in place and achievement of performance conditions as of February 24, 201823, 2019, the Company will be required to make payments of $0.8$1.1 million over the next year.

9. Stockholders' Equity
Successor Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 600,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of which 70,562,477 shares of Simply Good Foods were issued at the time of the Business Combination transaction and at August 26, 2017. The number of outstanding shares as of August 26, 2017 was previously reported within our Annual Report to be 70,628,322 due to the improper inclusion of 65,845 restricted stock units that were not outstanding shares of common stock at August 26, 2017. The disclosure of shares outstanding at August 26, 2017 has been updated in this report to reflect the actual number of shares outstanding.
During the twenty-six week period ended February 24, 2018, equity warrants were converted for 20,096 shares of common stock and 70,582,573 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding at February 24, 2018. Please refer to Note 11 regarding the treatment of stock-based compensation and restricted stock units.Equity Warrants

16


Table of Contents

Successor Equity Warrants
Prior to the Business Combination, Conyers Park issued 13,416,667 public warrants and 6,700,000 private placement warrants. Simply Good Foods assumed the Conyers Park equity warrants uponin connection with the change of control event.Business Combination. As a result of the Business Combination, the warrants issued by Conyers Park arewere no longer exercisable for shares of Conyers Park common stock, but were instead are exercisable for common stock of Simply Good Foods. All other features of the warrants remainwere unchanged.
Each whole
From August 26, 2018 through October 5, 2018, public warrants to purchase an aggregate of 9,866,451 shares of the Company's common stock were exercised for cash at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $113.5 million.


13


Table of Contents

On October 4, 2018, the Company delivered a notice for the redemption (the "Redemption Notice") of all of its public warrants that remained unexercised immediately after November 5, 2018. Holders who exercised public warrants following the Redemption Notice were required to do so on a cashless basis. Accordingly, holders were no longer permitted to exercise public warrants in exchange for payment in cash of $11.50 per share. Instead, a holder exercising a public warrant entitleswas deemed to have paid the $11.50 per share exercise price by the surrender of 0.61885 of a share of common stock that the holder would have been entitled to purchase one wholereceive upon a cash exercise of each public warrant. Exercising holders received 0.38115 of a share of the Company's common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below. Thefor each public warrant surrendered for exercise. Following the Redemption Notice, 3,499,639 public warrants became exercisable 30 days after the completionwere exercised on a cashless basis. An aggregate of the Business Combination and expire five years after that date, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. The private warrants do not expire.
The Company may call the public warrants for redemption, in whole and not in part, at a price of $0.01 per warrant upon not less than 30 days prior written notice of redemption to each warrant holder if the reported last sale price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ended three business days before the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.
If the number of outstanding1,333,848 shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock is increasedwere issued in connection with these exercises of the public warrants. All remaining public warrants were redeemed as of November 5, 2018 for an immaterial amount.

The Company's private warrants to purchase 6,700,000 shares of the Company's common stock remain outstanding.

Stock Repurchase Program

On November 13, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had adopted a $50.0 million stock repurchase program. Under the stock repurchase program, the Company may repurchase shares from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares or acquire shares over any specific period of time. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time by a stock dividend payable inthe Company, and does not have an expiration date.

During the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019, the Company repurchased 6,729 shares of common stock or by a split-upat an average share price of shares of common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such stock dividend, split-up or similar event, the number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be increased in proportion to such increase in the outstanding shares of common stock.$18.92 per share.
If the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock is decreased by a consolidation, combination, reverse stock split or reclassification of shares of common stock or other similar event, then, on the effective date of such consolidation, combination, reverse stock split, reclassification or similar event, the number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of each warrant will be decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares of common stock.
Due to the exercise of 20,096 warrants during the twenty-six week period ended February 24, 2018, the Company had 20,096,571 warrants outstanding as of February 24, 2018.
Predecessor Warrant Liabilities of Atkins
Atkins, the predecessor company, had outstanding warrants prior to the transaction forming Simply Good Foods. These Warrants were settled as a part of the Business Combination. Refer to Note 3 for additional details on the Business Combination.
Historically, the value of the predecessor warrants were reflected as a liability in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and adjusted to fair value each reporting period through change in warrant liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. For the predecessor entity, other income (expenses) of $1.1 million was included in the changes in warrant liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017.
10. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding for the Successor period.outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding and the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during each period.


17


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the computations of both basic and diluted earnings per share:
 Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
 February 24, 2018 February 24, 2018
(In thousands, except share data) (Successor) (Successor)
(In thousands, except per share data) February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018 February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Basic earnings per share computation:            
Numerator:            
Net income available to common stock shareholders $41,394
 $51,612
Net income $12,722
 $41,394
 $27,979
 $51,612
Denominator:            
Weighted average common shares - basic 70,582,573
 70,576,744
 81,900,352
 70,582,573
 79,595,330
 70,576,744
Basic earnings per share from net income $0.59
 $0.73
 $0.16
 $0.59
 $0.35
 $0.73
Diluted earnings per share computation:            
Numerator:            
Net income available to common stock shareholders $41,394
 $51,612
Net income $12,722
 $41,394
 $27,979
 $51,612
Denominator:            
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 70,582,573
 70,576,744
 81,900,352
 70,582,573
 79,595,330
 70,576,744
Warrant conversion 3,202,726
 2,000,021
Restricted stock units 46,908
 28,940
Public and Private Warrants 2,745,135
 3,202,726
 3,818,870
 2,000,021
Employee stock options 664,950
 
 612,304
 
Non-vested shares 39,759
 46,908
 35,975
 28,940
Weighted average common shares - diluted (1)
 73,832,207
 72,605,705
 85,350,196
 73,832,207
 84,062,479
 72,605,705
Diluted earnings per share from net income $0.56
 $0.71
 $0.15
 $0.56
 $0.33
 $0.71
(1) Excludes the effect of non-qualified stock options which were anti-dilutive for the respective periods.

Earnings per share calculations for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018 excluded 0.4 million and 2.4 million shares of stock options, respectively, that would have been anti-dilutive. Earnings per share calculations for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 excluded 0.1 million non-vested shares that would have been anti-dilutive.


14


Table of Contents

Earnings per share calculations for the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018 excluded 0.3 million and 2.5 million shares of stock options, respectively, that would have been anti-dilutive. Earnings per share calculations for the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 excluded 0.1 million non-vested shares, that would have been anti-dilutive.

11. Stock Option Plan

Stock-based compensation includes stock options, restricted stock unit and restrictedperformance stock unit awards, which are awarded to employees directors, and consultantsdirectors of the Company. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized for equity awardson a straight-line basis over the vestingrequisite service period of the award based on their grant date fair value. Stock-based compensation expense is included within General and administrative expense, which is the same financial statement caption where the recipient’s other compensation is reported.

The Company issuedrecorded $1.4 million and $0.9 million of stock-based compensation expense in the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018, respectively. The Company recorded $2.5 million and $2.0 million of stock-based compensation expense in each of the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018, respectively.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes stock optionsoption activity for the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019:
  Shares Weighted average
exercise price
 Weighted average remaining contractual life (in years)
Outstanding as of August 25, 2018 2,506,083
 $12.28
  
Granted 315,331
 19.89
  
Exercised (60,513) 12.00
  
Forfeited 
 
  
Outstanding as of February 23, 2019 2,760,901
 $13.15
 8.61
       
Vested and expected to vest as of February 23, 2019 2,760,901
 $13.15
 8.61
       
Exercisable as of February 23, 2019 726,855
 $12.00
 8.39

As of February 23, 2019, the Company had $6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to purchase 67,400 sharesstock option plans that will be recognized over a weighted average period of common stock exercisable at $12.00 per share during1.69 years. During the twenty-six week period ended February 24, 2018,23, 2019, the Company received $0.4 million in cash from stock option exercises.

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for athe twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019:
  Units Weighted average
grant-date fair value
Non-vested as of August 25, 2018 111,085
 $12.06
Granted 75,693
 18.67
Vested (68,268) 11.93
Forfeited (7,573) 15.91
Non-vested as of February 23, 2019 110,937
 $16.39

As of February 23, 2019, the Company had $1.3 million of total of 2,645,092unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock options outstanding withunits that will be recognized over a weighted average exerciseperiod of 1.47 years.

Performance Stock Units

During the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019, the board of directors granted performance stock units under the Company's equity compensation plan. Performance stock units vest in a range between 0% and 100% based upon the price of $12.00 per share, asthe Company's common stock at the end of February 24, 2018. The Company also awarded additional 69,804 restricted stock units at a weighted average fair value of $11.97 per share during the twenty-six week period ended February 24, 2018 for a total of 135,649 outstanding restricted stock units as of February 24, 2018. The Company recorded $0.9 million of stock-based compensation expense during the thirteen week successor period ended February 24, 2018 compared to $0.6 million of stock-based compensation expense recorded during thirteen week predecessor period ended February 25, 2017. The Company recorded $2.0 million of stock-based compensation expense during the twenty-six week successor period ended February 24, 2018 compared to $1.1 million of stock-based compensation expense recorded during the twenty-six week predecessor period ended February 25, 2017.
As of August 26, 2017, 65,845 shares of restrictedthree-year period. Performance stock units were outstanding which had not fully vested and are not included in the outstanding common stock included within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
12. Related Party Transactions
Successor
Tax Receivable Agreement

The TRA provides for the effective payment to the former equity holders of Atkins for cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax, or franchise tax that is actually realized asvalued using a result of the Business Combination discussed in Note 7.Monte-Carlo simulation.


1815


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes performance stock unit activity for the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019:
  Units Weighted average
grant-date fair value
Non-vested as of August 25, 2018 
 $
Granted 193,512
 11.93
Vested 
 
Forfeited 
 
Non-vested as of February 23, 2019 193,512
 $11.93

As of February 23, 2019, the Company had $2.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance stock units that will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.71 years.

12. Related Party Transactions

Tax Receivable Agreement

During the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019, the Company entered into the Termination Agreement, pursuant to which, the Company paid $26.5 million to settle the TRA (the "Termination Payment"), which provided former stockholders of Atkins with payments for federal, state, local and non-U.S. tax benefits deemed realized by the Company.

Under the Termination Agreement, each of the parties thereto agreed to terminate the TRA and to release and discharge any and all obligations and liabilities of the other parties thereunder effective as of the exchange agent's receipt of the Termination Payment. Richard Laube, a former director of the Company, Joseph Scalzo, our president and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, and Scott Parker, our Chief Marketing Officer, were each former stockholders of Atkins and received their respective pro rata share of the Termination Payment as additional consideration for their former stock ownership in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement. The TRA liability and subsequent settlement are discussed in Note 7.

Execution of the Merger Agreement

In the first quarter of fiscal 2018, per the terms of the Merger Agreement, Simply Good Foods paid a working capital adjustment of $1.8 million to the former owners of Atkins, which also resulted in ana corresponding increase to the previously recognized Goodwill.goodwill.

Predecessor
Pursuant to an arrangement with the former majority stockholder of Atkins, the Predecessor Company was obligated to pay a management fee of the greater of $0.9 million or an amount equal to 2% of consolidated adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), as defined by the First Lien and Second Lien, which can be prorated upon a fiscal year-end change. Annual reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses were limited to $0.2 million.

For the thirteen week predecessor period ended February 25, 2017, the management fee expense was $0.6 million. For the twenty-six week predecessor period ended February 25, 2017 the management fee expense was $1.0 million.

13. Segment and Customer Information

The Company has organized its operations into one operating segment that sells its branded nutritional foods and snacking products designed around the nutrition principles of the Atkins eating approach. The results of the operating segment are reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resource expenditures and assessing financial performance. This operating segment is therefore the Company’s only reportable segment.
14. Subsequent Events
Effective March 16, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. and NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (collectively, the “Borrower”), each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods, entered into an amendment (the “Repricing Amendment”) to that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2017, among the Borrower, Barclays Bank PLC (the “Agent”) and the other loan parties and lenders party thereto.
     As a result of the Repricing Amendment, the interest rate on the outstanding $200 million Term Loan was reduced and, effective as of the Effective Date, such loans bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Borrower’s option, either LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 3.50% or a base rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. With respect to the Term Loan, prior to the six-month anniversary of the Effective Date, a 1.00% prepayment premium is payable by the Borrower in connection with certain repricing events. Other than the prepayment premiums and penalties described above and the payment of customary “breakage” costs, the Borrower may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans at any time. The Repricing Amendment did not change the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility will continue to bear interest based upon the Borrower’s consolidated first lien net leverage ratio as of the last financial statements delivered to the Agent. No additional debt was incurred, or any proceeds received, by the Borrower in connection with the Repricing Amendment.

1916



Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains forward-looking statements. When used anywhere in this Report, the words “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial or operational performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We disclaim any undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties include those related to our ability to sell our products.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statementsconsolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 201725, 2018 ("Annual Report") and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this Report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements, such as statements regarding the Company’s expectation for future performance, liquidity and capital resources that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause such differences include those identified below and in Item 1A1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report. The Company assumes no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements.

Unless the context requires otherwise in this Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and "Simply Good Foods" refer to The Simply Good Foods Company and its subsidiaries.

Overview

Simply Good Foods is a growing developer, marketer and seller of branded nutritional foods and snacking products. OurIts highly-focused product portfolio consists primarily of nutrition bars, RTDready-to-drink (“RTD”) shakes, snacks and confectionery products marketed under the Atkins®, SimplyProtein®, Atkins Harvest Trail and Atkins Endulge® brand names. Over the past 45 years, Atkins has become an iconic American brand that for many consumers stands for “low carb,” “low sugar” and “protein rich” nutrition. The Atkins approach focuses on a healthy nutritional approach with reduced levels of carbohydrates and sugars and encourages the consumption of lean protein, fiber, fruits, vegetables, and good fats.

In our core Atkins snacking business, we strive to offer a complete line of nutrition bars, RTD shakes and confections that satisfy hunger while providing consumers with a convenient, “better-for-you” snacking alternative. In addition to snacking products, we have a license arrangement for frozen meals sold in the United States by Bellisio Foods, Inc.

We are a leading brand in nutritional snacking with a broad and growing consumer base. Our sales, marketing and R&D capabilities enable us to distribute products tointo a national customer base across the mass merchandiser, grocery and drug channels. We believe that ourAtkins’ broad brand recognition, depth of management talent and strong cash generation position us to continue to innovate in the Atkins brand and acquire other brands, and thereby become an industry leading snacking platform. To that end, in December 2016, weAtkins completed the acquisition of Wellness Foods, Inc., a Canada-based developer, marketer and seller of the SimplyProtein® brand that is focused on protein-rich and low-sugar products, which our management believes has significant opportunity for expansion in the U.S. In addition to snacking products, Atkins entered into a license arrangement in 2014 for frozen meals sold in the U.S. by Bellisio Foods, Inc.

Seasonality
The Company has
We have experienced in the past, and expectsexpect to continue to experience, seasonal fluctuations in sales as a result of consumer spending patterns. Historically, sales have been greatest in the first calendarsecond fiscal quarter as the Company sellswe sell product to retail locations, which sell to consumers in the second fiscal quarter, primarily driven by the post-holiday resolution season. The Company hasWe have also seen minimalsome seasonality in the summer and back-to-school shopping seasons in the third and fourth fiscal quarters, respectively.each year. The period of the lowest sales has historically been in the fourth fiscal quarter. The Company believesWe believe these consumer spending patterns are driven primarily by the predisposition of consumers to adjust their approach to nutrition at certain times of the year as well as the timing of the Company’sour advertising linked with key customer promotion windows.


20



Matters Affecting Comparability
The Simply Good Foods Company (“Simply Good Foods”) was formed on March 30, 2017 to consummate a business combination with NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (“Atkins”) and Conyers Park Acquisition Corp (“Conyers Park”). Conyers Park, a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”), was formed on April 20, 2016 for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses.
On April 10, 2017, Conyers Park and Atkins entered into a definitive merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”). Under the terms of the agreement, Conyers Park and Atkins combined under a new holding company, Simply Good Foods, which is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMPL” as of closing of the Business Combination.
On July 7, 2017 (the "Closing Date") Simply Good Foods completed the business combination with Conyers Park and Atkins (the “Business Combination”). As a result Simply Good Foods owns all of the equity in Atkins.
As a result of the Business Combination, Simply Good Foods is the acquirer for accounting purposes and the successor while Atkins is the acquiree and accounting predecessor. Our financial statement presentation includes the financial statements of Atkins as “Predecessor” for periods prior to the Closing Date and of Simply Good Foods for periods after the Closing Date, including the consolidation of Atkins.  Following the consummation of the Business Combination, we are obligated to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement (the “TRA”). See Note 7 Income Taxes for a detailed discussion of the TRA.
For convenience, we have also included supplemental pro forma information for the comparable periods of fiscal 2017 as if the Business Combination had been completed at the beginning of the fiscal year. References in this Quarterly Report to information provided on a pro forma basis refer to such supplemental pro forma financial information.
Our Reportable Segment

Our business is organized around one reportable segment based on our go-to-market strategies, the objectives of the business and how our chief decision maker, our CEO,Chief Executive Officer, monitors operating performance and allocates resources.


17



Key Financial Definitions

Net sales. Net sales consists primarily of product sales less cost of promotional activities, slotting fees and other sales credits and adjustments, including product returns. The CompanyWe also includesinclude licensing revenue from the frozen meals business in net sales.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold consists primarily of the costs we pay to our contract manufacturing partners to produce the products sold. These costs include the purchase of raw ingredients, packaging, and a tolling charge for the contract manufacturer. Cost of goods sold includes products provided at no charge as part of promotions and the non-food materials provided with customer orders.

Operating expenses. Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, marketing, distribution, general and administrative, depreciation and amortization, and other expenses. The following is a brief description of the components of operating expenses:

Distribution. Distribution is principally freight associated with shipping and handling of products to the customer.

Selling. Selling expenses are comprised of broker commissions and customer marketing.

Marketing. Marketing expenses are comprised of media and other marketing costs.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support our business, including fees for employee salaries, professional services, insurance and other general corporate expenses. We expect our general and administrative fees to increase as we incur additional legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses associated with being a public company.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization costs consist of costs associated with the depreciation of fixed assets and capitalized leasehold improvements and amortization of intangible assets.

Business transaction costs.costs. Business transaction costs are comprised of legal, due diligence and accounting firm expenses associated with process of actively pursuing a potential business combination.


21



GainLoss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability. (Gain) lossLoss in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability charges relate to fair value adjustments of the TRA liability.

Other expense. Other expense is principally costs of restructuring consisting of severance and related expenses.

Results of Operations

Our strong second quarter and year-to date results reflect the successful execution of our annual plan as well as our strategic initiatives. We delivered double-digit sales, gross profit and Adjusted EBITDA growth in both the second quarter and year-to-date periods. Our U.S. retail takeaway, as measured by IRI for the thirteen week period ended February 23, 2019, continued to be strong and was up 22.1% versus the prior year. We continued to expand Adjusted EBITDA margin while also making investments in marketing and organizational capabilities that we believe will benefit the company in the near and long term.

In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a number of key performance indicators used by management and typically used by our competitors, including the non-GAAP measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Because not all companies use identical calculations, this presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. See “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below for a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income for each applicable period.


2218


Table of Contents

Comparison of Unaudited Results for the Successor Period forThirteen Weeks Ended February 23, 2019 and the Thirteen Weeks Ended February 24, 2018 and the Predecessor Period

The following unaudited table presents, for the Thirteenperiods indicated, selected information from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, including information presented as a percentage of net sales:
  Thirteen Weeks Ended   Thirteen Weeks Ended  
(In thousands) February 23, 2019 % of Sales February 24, 2018 % of Sales
Net sales $123,800
 100.0 % $109,347
 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold 66,166
 53.4 % 59,090
 54.0 %
Gross profit 57,634
 46.6 % 50,257
 46.0 %
         
Operating expenses:        
Distribution 5,797
 4.7 % 5,391
 4.9 %
Selling 2,533
 2.0 % 4,975
 4.5 %
Marketing 12,196
 9.9 % 10,056
 9.2 %
General and administrative 15,855
 12.8 % 12,711
 11.6 %
Depreciation and amortization 1,939
 1.6 % 1,948
 1.8 %
Business transaction costs 290
 0.2 % 1,877
 1.7 %
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability 
  % (3,668) (3.4)%
Other expense 22
  % 184
 0.2 %
Total operating expenses 38,632
 31.2 % 33,474
 30.6 %
         
Income from operations 19,002
 15.3 % 16,783
 15.3 %
         
Other income (expense):        
Interest income 884
 0.7 % 
  %
Interest expense (3,344) (2.7)% (3,093) (2.8)%
Gain on foreign currency transactions 130
 0.1 % 601
 0.5 %
Other income 77
 0.1 % 312
 0.3 %
Total other expense (2,253) (1.8)% (2,180) (2.0)%
         
Income before income taxes 16,749
 13.5 % 14,603
 13.4 %
Income tax expense (benefit) 4,027
 3.3 % (26,791) (24.5)%
Net income $12,722
 10.3 % $41,394
 37.9 %
         
Other financial data:        
Adjusted EBITDA $22,965
 18.6 % $18,807
 17.2 %

Net sales. Net sales of $123.8 million represented an increase of $14.5 million, or 13.2%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The net sales increase of 13.2% was driven by volume growth, primarily due to strong U.S. retail takeaway, and favorable price related trade, partially offset by a shift in non-price related customer activity.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $7.1 million, or 12.0%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The cost of goods sold increase is driven by sales volume growth.

Gross profit. Gross profit increased $7.4 million, or 14.7%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. Gross profit of $57.6 million, or 46.6% of net sales, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 increased 60 basis points from 46.0% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to favorable trade spend, as in-store promotions were lower versus last year.


19


Table of Contents

Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $5.2 million, or 15.4%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 due to the following:

Distribution. Distribution expenses increased $0.4 million, or 7.5%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase is primarily driven by sales volume growth and is partially offset by logistics efficiencies.

Selling. Sellingexpenses decreased $2.4 million, or 49.1%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The decrease is primarily due to a shift in non-price related customer activity.

Marketing. Marketingexpenses increased $2.1 million, or 21.3%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase is primarily driven by an increase in television media and e-commerce investments.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $3.1 million, or 24.7%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase is due to higher incentive compensation of $2.4 million and investments to enhance organizational capabilities in key functions of $0.9 million.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 were flat compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018.

Business transaction costs. Business transaction costs decreased $1.6 million, or 84.5%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The $1.9 million recorded in the prior year is primarily related to a secondary public offering of common shares by a former stockholder. The $0.3 million recorded in the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 is comprised of expenses relating to business development activities.

Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability. The thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 included a gain in fair value change of contingent consideration of $3.7 million related to the prior year impact of the tax law change. The TRA liability was settled in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. For additional information on the settlement of the TRA, see Note 7 in the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest income. Interest income increased $0.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018, due to the Company's increased cash balance resulting from warrant exercises during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and changes in market interest rates.

Interest expense. Interest expense increased $0.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018, due to changes in market interest rates.

Gain on foreign currency transactions. A gain of $0.1 million in foreign currency transactions was recorded for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to a foreign currency gain of $0.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The change relates to changes in foreign currency rates related to international operations.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense increased $30.8 million, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase in our income tax expense is primarily attributed to the one-time gain of $29.0 million related to the tax law change and remeasurement of deferred tax liabilities recorded in the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to income tax expense recognized at an effective rate of 24.0% for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $4.2 million, or 22.1%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase is primarily due to higher gross profit, partially offset by higher operating expenses. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.


20


Table of Contents

Comparison of Unaudited Results for the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended February 25, 201723, 2019 and the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended February 24, 2018

The following unaudited table presents, for the periods indicated, selected information from our condensed consolidated financial results, including information presented as a percentage of net sales (in thousands):sales:
 Successor  Predecessor Twenty-Six Weeks Ended   Twenty-Six Weeks Ended  
 unaudited    unaudited  
 13-weeks ended    13-weeks ended  
(in thousands) February 24, 2018 % of Sales  February 25, 2017 % of Sales
(In thousands) February 23, 2019 % of Sales February 24, 2018 % of Sales
Net sales $109,347
 100.0 %  $102,308
 100.0 % $244,731
 100.0 % $215,934
 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold 59,090
 54.0 %  55,735
 54.5 % 127,986
 52.3 % 112,920
 52.3 %
Gross profit 50,257
 46.0 %  46,573
 45.5 % 116,745
 47.7 % 103,014
 47.7 %
                 
Operating Expenses:         
Operating expenses:        
Distribution 5,391
 4.9 %  4,960
 4.8 % 11,081
 4.5 % 10,208
 4.7 %
Selling 4,975
 4.5 %  3,978
 3.9 % 6,389
 2.6 % 8,878
 4.1 %
Marketing 10,056
 9.2 %  10,030
 9.8 % 23,659
 9.7 % 19,906
 9.2 %
General and administrative 12,711
 11.6 %  11,768
 11.5 % 29,724
 12.1 % 24,790
 11.5 %
Depreciation and amortization 1,948
 1.8 %  2,474
 2.4 % 3,825
 1.6 % 3,882
 1.8 %
Business transaction costs 1,877
 1.7 %  
  % 1,329
 0.5 % 1,877
 0.9 %
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability (3,668) (3.4)%  
  %
Other Expense 184
 0.2 %  58
 0.1 %
Loss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability 533
 0.2 % (3,026) (1.4)%
Other expense 21
  % 430
 0.2 %
Total operating expenses 33,474
 30.6 %  33,268
 32.5 % 76,561
 31.3 % 66,945
 31.0 %
                 
Income from operations 16,783
 15.3 %  13,305
 13.0 % 40,184
 16.4 % 36,069
 16.7 %
                 
Other income (expense):                 
Changes in warrant liabilities 
  %  (1,119) (1.1)%
Interest income 1,665
 0.7 % 
  %
Interest expense (3,093) (2.8)%  (6,566) (6.4)% (6,605) (2.7)% (6,112) (2.8)%
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions 601
 0.5 %  (108) (0.1)%
Gain on settlement of TRA liability 1,534
 0.6 % 
  %
(Loss) gain on foreign currency transactions (268) (0.1)% 956
 0.4 %
Other income 312
 0.3 %  22
  % 121
  % 398
 0.2 %
Total other expense (2,180) (2.0)%  (7,771) (7.6)% (3,553) (1.5)% (4,758) (2.2)%
                 
Income before income taxes 14,603
 13.4 %  5,534
 5.4 % 36,631
 15.0 % 31,311
 14.5 %
Income tax (benefit) expense (26,791) (24.5)%  2,071
 2.0 %
Income tax expense (benefit) 8,652
 3.5 % (20,301) (9.4)%
Net income $41,394
 37.9 %  $3,463
 3.4 % $27,979
 11.4 % $51,612
 23.9 %
                 
Other financial data:        

        
Adjusted EBITDA $18,807
 17.2 %  $18,109
 17.7 % $49,663
 20.3 % $42,517
 19.7 %

Net sales. Net sales of $109.3$244.7 million increased $7.0represented an increase of $28.8 million, or 6.9%13.3%, for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017.2018. The increase in net sales increase of 13.3% was driven by volume growth, primarily due to strong U.S. retail takeaway, and favorable price related trade, partially offset by organic sales growth of $5.8 million driven by increased sales of our productsa shift in the U.S. and net sales associated with the addition of Wellness Foods of $1.2 million.non-price related customer activity.

Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $3.4$15.1 million, or 6.0%13.3%, for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 20182018. The cost of goods sold increase is driven by sales volume growth.

Gross profit. Gross profit increased $13.7 million, or 13.3%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily due to24, 2018. Gross profit of $116.7 million, or 47.7% of net sales, growth of $3.8 million andfor the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 was in-line with the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018. Gross margin is impacted by non-price related customer activity that is a reclassification from selling expense, offset by favorable trade spend, as in-store promotions were lower supply chain costs of $0.4 million.versus last year.

2321


Table of Contents

Gross profit. Gross profit increased $3.7 million, or 7.9%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. Gross margin of $50.3 million, or 46.0% of net sales, for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 increased 50 basis points from 45.5% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017 due to a reduction in supply chain costs.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $0.2$9.6 million, or 0.6%14.4%, for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017 due to the following:

Distribution. Distribution expenses increased $0.4$0.9 million, or 8.7%8.6%, for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017.2018. The increase wasis primarily driven by higher cost to serve on a rate basis for distribution to customers.sales volume growth and is partially offset by logistics efficiencies.

Selling. Selling expenses increased $1.0decreased $2.5 million, or 25.1%28.0%, for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 20182018. The decrease is primarily due to a shift in non-price related customer activity.

Marketing. Marketingexpenses increased $3.8 million, or 18.9%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017.24, 2018. The increase wasis primarily driven by increased levels of customer specific in-store marketingan increase in television media and online activity.e-commerce investments.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $0.9$4.9 million, or 19.9%, for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017.2018. The increase is relateddue to additional general and administrative costs from the acquisitionhigher incentive compensation of Wellness Foods$2.4 million, investments to enhance organizational capabilities in key functions of $0.3 million, employee related costs of $0.2 million, book publishing and related public relations of $0.3$2.1 million, and higher public company costs.other expenses of $0.4 million.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.5 million for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 were flat compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The difference is related to the change in the basis of the amortizable intangible assets revalued at the time of the Business Combination.2018.

Business transaction costs. costsThe Company recorded $1.9 million in. Business transaction costs decreased $0.5 million, or 29.2%, for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during2018. The $1.9 million recorded in the thirteen week periodprior year is primarily related to a secondary public offering of common shares by a former stockholder. The $1.3 million recorded in the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017.23, 2019 is comprised of expenses relating to business development activities.

GainLoss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability. The Company recorded $3.7 millionLoss in contingent consideration benefitincreased $3.6 million for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase is due to the timing of the settlement of the TRA liability during the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019. The gain in the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 which were not incurred duringreflects the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The benefit is due to the change in the fair value of the TRA from the beneficial impact of the change in tax law. The TRA relates to the Business Combinationlaw in the prior year.

Change in warrant liabilities. Interest incomeFor. Interest income increased $1.7 million for the thirteen week predecessor periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, a gain of $1.1 million was recorded which related23, 2019 compared to the fair value changetwenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, due to the Company's increased cash balance resulting from warrant exercises during the twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 and changes in the predecessor warrant liabilities. The predecessor warrant liabilities were settled in conjunction with the Business Combination in the prior year.market interest rates.

Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $3.5increased $0.5 million for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, compareddue to changes in market interest rates.

Gain on settlement of TRA liability. The Company recorded a $1.5 million gain in connection with the thirteen week periodsettlement of the TRA liability in the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, which23, 2019. The TRA settlement is discussed in Note 7 of the result of favorable refinance terms and reduced outstanding principal balance of long-term debt due to the Business Combinationcondensed consolidated financial statements included in the prior year.this Report.

Gain (loss)(Loss) gain on foreign currency transactions. A gainloss of $0.6$0.3 million in foreign currency transactions was recorded for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 24, 201823, 2019 compared to a foreign currency lossgain of $0.1$1.0 million for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, representing a favorable change of $0.7 million.24, 2018. The change relates to the changechanges in foreign currency rates related to international operations around the world.operations.

Income tax expense.expense (benefit). Income tax expense decreased $28.9increased $29.0 million, for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018. The increase in our income tax expense is primarily attributed to the one-time gain of $29.0 million related to the tax law change and remeasurement of deferred tax liabilities recorded in the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to income tax expense recognized at an effective rate of 23.6% for the thirteen week periodtwenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The difference is primarily due to the preliminary assessment of the tax law change on the Company's tax liabilities. The change in Tax Law is discussed in Note 7 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.23, 2019.


24
22


Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $0.7$7.1 million, or 3.9%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The increase is due to higher gross profit offset by higher operating expenses. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.

Supplemental Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Thirteen Week Period Ended February 25, 2017

The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared from the perspective of Atkins and its thirteen week quarter ended February 25, 2017. The unaudited pro forma income statement presents the historical consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 28, 2016.

The unaudited pro forma financial statements give effect to the Business Combination in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are related and/or directly attributable to the Business Combination, are factually supportable and are expected to have a continuing impact on the results of the combined company. The adjustments presented on the unaudited pro forma financial statements have been identified and presented to provide relevant information necessary for an accurate understanding of the combined company upon consummation of the Business Combination.

The unaudited pro forma financial information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different if the Business Combination actually been completed sooner. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved if the Business Combination been completed as of the beginning of fiscal 2017.

25



Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Pro Forma Thirteen Week Period Ended February 25, 2017
(In thousands)
  Unaudited Historical (i)   Pro Forma
  (Predecessor)   Unaudited
  Thirteen Weeks Ended Pro Forma Adjustments Thirteen Weeks Ended
(in thousands) February 25, 2017  February 25, 2017
Net sales $102,308
 $
 $102,308
Cost of goods sold 55,735
 

55,735
Gross profit 46,573
 
 46,573
       
Operating Expenses:      
Distribution 4,960
 
 4,960
Selling 3,978
 
 3,978
Marketing 10,030
 
 10,030
General and administrative 11,768
 335
ii12,103
Depreciation and amortization 2,474
 (560)iii1,914
Other expense 58
 
 58
Total operating expenses 33,268
 (225) 33,043
       
Income from operations 13,305
 225
 13,530
       
Other income (expense):      
Change in warrant liabilities (1,119) 1,119
iv
Interest expense (6,566) 3,709
v(2,857)
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions (108) 
 (108)
Other income 22
 
 22
Total other expense (7,771) 4,828
 (2,943)
       
Income before income taxes 5,534
 5,053
 10,587
Income tax (benefit) or expense 2,071
 2,121
vi4,192
Net income $3,463
 $2,932
 $6,395
       
Other Financial Data (Unaudited):      
Adjusted EBITDA (vii) $18,109
   $18,109

i. The amounts presented represent the Predecessor’s historical GAAP results of operations.
ii. The adjustment represents the incremental stock-based compensation expense under the new Simply Good Foods omnibus incentive plan.
iii. The adjustment reflects the difference in the intangible asset amortization expense associated with the allocation of purchase price to intangible assets due to the Business Combination. The amortization expense decreased as more indefinite lived intangible assets were identified for the successor entity than the predecessor entity. The amount of amortizable intangible assets identified in the Business Combination decreased from $125.8 million to $88.0 million.
iv. Simply Good Foods warrants are not liabilities and are accounted for as equity warrants. To make the periods comparable the adjustment represents the corresponding reversal of the predecessor fair value adjustment of expense.
v. The adjustment represents the expected interest expense associated with the term loan and revolving debt facilities of Simply Good Foods. The predecessor entity had $337.2 million outstanding as of August 27, 2016 while the successor entity had $200.0 million outstanding. The long-term debt of the predecessor entity accrued interest at 6.25% on the first lien and 9.75% on the second lien while the successor debt accrues interest at 3 month LIBOR and 4%. The significant reduction in outstanding principal, and lower interest rates, drive significant expense savings.
vi. Represents the effective income tax rate of 39.6%
vii. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.


26



Comparison of Unaudited Results for the Thirteen Week Period Ended February 24, 2018 and the Supplemental Pro Forma Thirteen Week Period Ended February 25, 2017

For comparative purposes, we are presenting an unaudited statement of operations for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018, compared to unaudited supplemental pro forma statement of operations for the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected information from our supplemented unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial results, including information presented as a percentage of net sales:
  Historical   Pro Forma
  Successor  Predecessor
  unaudited    unaudited  
  13-weeks ended    13-weeks ended  
(in thousands) February 24, 2018 % of sales  February 25, 2017 % of sales
Net sales $109,347
 100.0 %  $102,308
 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold 59,090
 54.0 %  55,735
 54.5 %
Gross profit 50,257
 46.0 %  46,573
 45.5 %
          
Operating Expenses:         
Distribution 5,391
 4.9 %  4,960
 4.8 %
Selling 4,975
 4.5 %  3,978
 3.9 %
Marketing 10,056
 9.2 %  10,030
 9.8 %
General and administrative 12,711
 11.6 %  12,103
 11.8 %
Depreciation and amortization 1,948
 1.8 %  1,914
 1.9 %
Business transaction costs
 1,877
 1.7 %  
  %
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability (3,668) (3.4)%  
  %
Other Expense 184
 0.2 %  58
 0.1 %
Total operating expenses 33,474
 30.6 %  33,043
 32.3 %
          
Income from operations 16,783
 15.3 %  13,530
 13.2 %
          
Other income (expense):         
Changes in warrant liabilities 
  %  
  %
Interest expense (3,093) (2.8)%  (2,857) (2.8)%
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions 601
 0.5 %  (108) (0.1)%
Other income 312
 0.3 %  22
  %
Total other expense (2,180) (2.0)%  (2,943) (2.9)%
          
Income before income taxes 14,603
 13.4 %  10,587
 10.3 %
Income tax (benefit) expense (26,791) (24.5)%  4,192
 4.1 %
Net income $41,394
 37.9 %  $6,395
 6.3 %
          
Other Financial Data (Unaudited):         
Adjusted EBITDA $18,807
 17.2 %  $18,109
 17.7 %

Net sales. Net sales of $109.3 million increased $7.0 million, or 6.9%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase in net sales was driven primarily by organic sales growth of $5.8 million driven by increased sales of our products in the U.S. and net sales associated with the addition of Wellness Foods of $1.2 million.

27



Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $3.4 million, or 6.0%, for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily due to net sales growth of $3.8 million and a reduction in supply chain costs of $0.4 million.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased $3.7 million, or 7.9%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. Gross margin of $50.3 million, or 46.0% of net sales, for the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 increased 50 basis points from 45.5% of net sales for the pro forma thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017 due to a reduction in supply chain costs.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $0.4 million, or 1.3%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017 due to the following:
Distribution. Distribution expenses increased $0.4 million, or 8.7%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by higher cost to serve on a rate basis for distribution to customers.
Selling. Sellingexpenses increased $1.0 million, or 25.1%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The increase was driven by increased levels of customer specific in-store marketing and online activity.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The increase is related to the additional general and administrative costs from acquisition of Wellness Foods of $0.3 million, book publishing and related public relations of $0.3 million, and higher public company costs.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses remained consistent between the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017 is adjusted based on the change in the depreciable basis of intangible assets as if the Business Combination occurred at the beginning of the year.
Business transaction costs. The Company recorded $1.9 million in transaction costs for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017.
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability. The Company recorded $3.7 million in contingent consideration benefit for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during the thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The benefit is due to the change in the fair value of the TRA from the beneficial impact of the change in tax law. The TRA relates to the Business Combination in the prior year.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $0.2 million for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017, resulting from higher Libor rates associated with the Term Loan. The pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017 is adjusted based of the long-term debt of the Company as if the Business Combination occurred at the beginning of the year.
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions. A gain of $0.6 million in foreign currency transactions was recorded for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to a foreign currency loss of $0.1 million for the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017, representing a favorable change of $0.7 million. The change relates to the change in foreign currency rates related to international operations around the world.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense decreased $31.0 million for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The difference is primarily due to the preliminary assessment of the tax law change on the Company's tax liabilities. For the thirteen week period the anticipated effective tax rate assumed within the pro forma financial statements was 39.6% compared to an actual effective tax rate of (183.5)%. The change in Tax Law is discussed in Note 7 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Adjusted EBITDA.Adjusted EBITDA increased $0.7 million, or 3.9%, for the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018 compared to the pro forma thirteen week period ended February 25, 2017. The increase is due to higher gross profit offset by higher operating expenses. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.

28




Comparison of Unaudited Results for the Successor Period for the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended February 24, 2018 and the Predecessor Period for the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended February 25, 2017
The following unaudited table presents, for the periods indicated, selected information from our condensed consolidated financial results, including information presented as a percentage of net sales (in thousands):
  Successor  Predecessor
  unaudited    unaudited  
  26-weeks ended    26-weeks ended  
(in thousands) February 24, 2018 % of Sales  February 25, 2017 % of Sales
Net sales $215,934
 100.0 %  $202,111
 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold 112,920
 52.3 %  106,826
 52.9 %
Gross profit 103,014
 47.7 %  95,285
 47.1 %
          
Operating Expenses:         
Distribution 10,208
 4.7 %  9,329
 4.6 %
Selling 8,878
 4.1 %  8,271
 4.1 %
Marketing 19,906
 9.2 %  19,236
 9.5 %
General and administrative 24,790
 11.5 %  21,699
 10.7 %
Depreciation and amortization 3,882
 1.8 %  4,927
 2.4 %
Business transaction costs 1,877
 0.9 %  
  %
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability (3,026) (1.4)%  
  %
Other Expense 430
 0.2 %  58
  %
Total operating expenses 66,945
 31.0 %  63,520
 31.4 %
          
Income from operations 36,069
 16.7 %  31,765
 15.7 %
          
Other income (expense):         
Changes in warrant liabilities 
  %  (397) (0.2)%
Interest expense (6,112) (2.8)%  (13,629) (6.7)%
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions 956
 0.4 %  (718) (0.4)%
Other income 398
 0.2 %  199
 0.1 %
Total other expense (4,758) (2.2)%  (14,545) (7.2)%
          
Income before income taxes 31,311
 14.5 %  17,220
 8.5 %
Income tax (benefit) expense (20,301) (9.4)%  6,970
 3.4 %
Net income $51,612
 23.9 %  $10,250
 5.1 %
          
Other financial data:         
Adjusted EBITDA $42,517
 19.7 %  $40,360
 20.0 %

Net sales. Net sales of $215.9 million increased $13.8 million, or 6.8%16.8%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 201823, 2019 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017.24, 2018. The increase in net sales was driven primarily by organic sales growth of $9.8 million driven by increased sales of our products in the U.S. and net sales associated with the addition of Wellness Foods of $4.0 million.
Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $6.1 million, or 5.7%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily due to volume growth of $7.3 million, offset by a reduction in supply chain costs of $0.7 million and product mix of $0.5 million.

29



Gross profit. Gross profit increased $7.7 million, or 8.1%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. Gross margin of $103.0 million, or 47.7% of net sales, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 increased 60 basis points from 47.1% of net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017 due to a reduction in supply chain costs and favorable product mix.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $3.4 million, or 5.4%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017 due to the following:
Distribution. Distribution expenses increased $0.9 million, or 9.4%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by higher cost to serve on a rate basis for distribution to customers.
Selling. Sellingexpenses increased $0.6 million, or 7.3%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by $1.1 million of increased levels of customer-specific marketing activity, offset by broker savings of $0.5 million.
Marketing. Marketingexpenses increased $0.7 million, or 3.5%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase in expense was primarily driven by an increase in media spending.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $3.1 million, or 14.2%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase is related to the additional general and administrative costs from the acquisition of Wellness Foods of $0.8 million, incremental public company costs of $1.2 million, employee related costs of $0.7 million, and book publishing and related public relations of $0.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $1.0 million, or 21.2%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The difference is related to the change in the basis of the amortizable intangible assets revalued at the time of the Business Combination.
Business transaction costs. The Company recorded $1.9 million in transaction costs for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017.
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability. The Company recorded a $3.0 million in contingent consideration gain for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The benefit is due to the change in the fair value of the TRA from the beneficial impact of the change in tax law. The TRA relates to the Business Combination in the prior year.
Change in warrant liabilities. For the predecessor twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, a gain of $0.4 million was recorded which related to the fair value change in the predecessor warrant liabilities. The predecessor warrant liabilities were settled in conjunction with the Business Combination in the prior year.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased $7.5 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, which is the result of favorable refinance terms and reduced outstanding principal balance of long-term debt originated with the Business Combination in the prior year.
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions. A gain of $1.0 million in foreign currency transactions was recorded for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to a foreign currency loss of $0.7 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, representing a favorable change of $1.7 million. The change relates to the change in foreign currency rates related to international operations around the world.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense decreased $27.3 million or 391.3%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The difference is primarily due to the preliminary assessment of the tax law change on the Company's tax liabilities. The change in Tax Law is discussed in Note 7 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.

30



Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $2.2 million, or 5.3%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase is due to higher gross profit, partially offset by higher operating expenses. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.

Supplemental Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Twenty-Six Week Period EndedFebruary 25, 2017

The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been prepared from the perspective of Atkins and for the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The unaudited pro forma income statement presents the historical consolidated statement of operations of Atkins for the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, giving effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on August 28, 2016.

The unaudited pro forma financial statements give effect to the Business Combination in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give pro forma effect to events that are related and/or directly attributable to the Business Combination, are factually supportable and are expected to have a continuing impact on the results of the combined company. The adjustments presented on the unaudited pro forma financial statements have been identified and presented to provide relevant information necessary for an accurate understanding of the combined company upon consummation of the Business Combination.

The unaudited pro forma financial information is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may have been different if the Business Combination actually been completed sooner. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved if the Business Combination been completed as of the beginning of fiscal 2017.


31



Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Pro Forma Twenty-Six Week Period Ended February 25, 2017
(In thousands)
  Unaudited Historical (i)   Pro Forma
  (Predecessor)   Unaudited
  26-weeks ended Pro Forma Adjustments 26-weeks ended
(in thousands) February 25, 2017  February 25, 2017
Net sales $202,111
 $
 $202,111
Cost of goods sold 106,826
 

106,826
Gross profit 95,285
 
 95,285
       
Operating Expenses:      
Distribution 9,329
 
 9,329
Selling 8,271
 
 8,271
Marketing 19,236
 
 19,236
General and administrative 21,699
 681
ii22,380
Depreciation and amortization 4,927
 (1,121)iii3,806
Other expense 58
 
 58
Total operating expenses 63,520
 (440) 63,080
       
Income from operations 31,765
 440
 32,205
       
Other income (expense):      
Change in warrant liabilities (397) 397
iv
Interest expense (13,629) 7,674
v(5,955)
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions (718) 
 (718)
Other income 199
 
 199
Total other expense (14,545) 8,071
 (6,474)
       
Income before income taxes 17,220
 8,511
 25,731
Income tax (benefit) or expense 6,970
 3,219
vi10,189
Net income $10,250
 $5,292
 $15,542
       
Other Financial Data (Unaudited):      
Adjusted EBITDA (vii) $40,360
   $40,360

i. The amounts presented represent the Predecessor’s historical GAAP results of operations.
ii. The adjustment represents the incremental stock-based compensation expense under the new Simply Good Foods omnibus incentive plan.
iii. The adjustment reflects the difference in the intangible asset amortization expense associated with the allocation of purchase price to intangible assets due to the Business Combination. The amortization expense decreased as more indefinite lived intangible assets were identified for the successor entity than the predecessor entity. The amount of amortizable intangible assets identified in the Business Combination decreased from $125.8 million to $88.0 million.
iv. Simply Good Foods warrants are not liabilities and are accounted for as equity warrants. To make the periods comparable the adjustment represents the corresponding reversal of the predecessor fair value adjustment of expense.
v. The adjustment represents the expected interest expense associated with the term loan and revolving debt facilities of Simply Good Foods. The predecessor entity had $337.2 million outstanding as of August 27, 2016 while the successor entity had $200.0 million outstanding. The long-term debt of the predecessor entity accrued interest at 6.25% on the first lien and 9.75% on the second lien while the successor debt accrues interest at 3 month LIBOR and 4%. The significant reduction in outstanding principal, and lower interest rates, drive significant expense savings.
vi. Represents the effective income tax rate of 39.6%
vii. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.


32



Comparison of Unaudited Results for the Twenty-Six Week Period Ended February 24, 2018 and the Supplemental Pro Forma Twenty-Six Week Period Ended February 25, 2017

For comparative purposes, we are presenting an unaudited statement of operations for the twenty-six week period ended February 24, 2018, compared to unaudited supplemental pro forma statement of operations for the twenty-six week period ended February 25, 2017. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected information from our supplemented unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial results, including information presented as a percentage of net sales:
  Historical   Pro Forma
  Successor  Predecessor
  unaudited    unaudited  
  26-weeks ended    26-weeks ended  
(in thousands) February 24, 2018 % of sales  February 25, 2017 % of sales
Net sales $215,934
 100.0 %  $202,111
 100.0 %
Cost of goods sold 112,920
 52.3 %  106,826
 52.9 %
Gross profit 103,014
 47.7 %  95,285
 47.1 %
          
Operating Expenses:         
Distribution 10,208
 4.7 %  9,329
 4.6 %
Selling 8,878
 4.1 %  8,271
 4.1 %
Marketing 19,906
 9.2 %  19,236
 9.5 %
General and administrative 24,790
 11.5 %  22,380
 11.1 %
Depreciation and amortization 3,882
 1.8 %  3,806
 1.9 %
Business transaction costs 1,877
 0.9 %  
  %
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability (3,026) (1.4)%  
  %
Other Expense 430
 0.2 %  58
  %
Total operating expenses 66,945
 31.0 %  63,080
 31.2 %
          
Income from operations 36,069
 16.7 %  32,205
 15.9 %
          
Other income (expense):         
Changes in warrant liabilities 
  %  
  %
Interest expense (6,112) (2.8)%  (5,955) (2.9)%
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions 956
 0.4 %  (718) (0.4)%
Other income 398
 0.2 %  199
 0.1 %
Total other expense (4,758) (2.2)%  (6,474) (3.2)%
          
Income before income taxes 31,311
 14.5 %  25,731
 12.7 %
Income tax (benefit) expense (20,301) (9.4)%  10,189
 5.0 %
Net income $51,612
 23.9 %  $15,542
 7.7 %
          
Other Financial Data (Unaudited):         
Adjusted EBITDA $42,517
 19.7 %  $40,360
 20.0 %

Net sales. Net sales of $215.9 million increased $13.8 million, or 6.8%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase in net sales was driven primarily by organic sales growth of $9.8 million driven by increased sales of our products in the U.S. and net sales associated with the addition of Wellness Foods of $4.0 million.

33



Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold increased $6.1 million, or 5.7%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily due to volume growth of $7.3 million, offset by a reduction in supply chain costs of $0.7 million and product mix of $0.5 million.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased $7.7 million, or 8.1%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. Gross margin of $103.0 million, or 47.7% of net sales, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 increased 60 basis points from 47.1% of net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017 due to a reduction in supply chain costs and favorable product mix.
Operating expenses. Operating expenses increased $3.9 million, or 6.1%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017 due to the following:
Distribution. Distribution expenses increased $0.9 million, or 9.4%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by higher cost to serve on a rate basis for distribution to customers.
Selling. Sellingexpenses increased $0.6 million, or 7.3%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by $1.1 million of increased levels of customer-specific marketing activity, offset by broker savings of $0.5 million.
Marketing. Marketingexpenses increased $0.7 million, or 3.5%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase in expense was primarily driven by an increase in media spending.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million, or 10.8%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase is related to additional general and administrative costs from the acquisition of Wellness Foods of $0.8 million, incremental public company costs of $1.2 million, book publishing and related public relations of $0.3 million.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.1 million, or 2.0%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The difference is related to the change in the basis of the amortizable intangible assets revalued at the time of the Business Combination.
Business transaction costs. The Company recorded $1.9 million in transaction costs for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017.
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability. The Company recorded $3.0 million in contingent consideration gain for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018, which were not incurred during the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The benefit is due to the change in the fair value of the TRA from the beneficial impact of the change in tax law. The TRA relates to the Business Combination in the prior year.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $0.2 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, resulting from higher Libor rates associated with the Term Loan. The pro forma twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017 is adjusted based of the long-term debt of the Company as if the Business Combination occurred at the beginning of the year.
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions. A gain of $1.0 million in foreign currency transactions was recorded for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to a foreign currency loss of $0.7 million for the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017, representing a favorable change of $1.7 million. The change relates to the change in foreign currency rates related to international operations around the world.

34



Income tax expense. Income tax expense decreased $30.5 million, or 299.2%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The difference is primarily due to the preliminary assessment of the tax law change on the Company's tax liabilities. For the thirteen week period the anticipated effective tax rate assumed within the pro forma financial statements was 39.6% compared to an actual effective tax rate of (64.8)%. The change in Tax Law is discussed in Note 7 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA increased $2.2 million, or 5.3%, for the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 compared to the twenty-six weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase is due to higher gross profit offset by higher operating expenses. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA” below.
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure commonly used in our industry and should not be construedconsidered in isolation or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow provided by operating activities as a measure of liquidity (each as determined in accordance with GAAP).under GAAP. Simply Good Foods defines Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) as net income (loss) before interest income, interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization with further adjustments to exclude the following items: stock-based compensation, and warrant expense, transaction costs and IPO readiness costs, restructuring costs, management fees, frozen media licensing fees,non-core legal costs, transactional exchange impact, change in fair value of contingent consideration - TRA liability, gain on settlement of TRA liability, business transaction costs and other non-core expenses. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management to monitor results of ongoing operations. The Company believes Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to management and investors regarding certain financial and business trends relating to the financial condition and results of operations to date; and that the inclusionuse of these supplementary adjustments in presenting Adjusted EBITDA are appropriateprovides an additional tool for investors to provide additional information to investors and reflects more accuratelyuse in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends in and in comparing financial measures with other similar companies, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors. Adjusted EBITDA is subject to inherent limitations as it reflects the on-going operations. exercise of judgments by management about which expense and income are excluded or included in determining Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to differences in calculation.

The following unaudited tables below providesprovide a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, which is net income, (loss), for the thirteen week periodsweeks and twenty-six weeks ended February 23, 2019 and February 24, 2018 (Successor), February 25, 2017 (Predecessor), and pro forma period ended February 25, 2017.2018:
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation:
(in thousands)
Thirteen Weeks Ended  Thirteen Weeks Ended Thirteen Weeks Ended
February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 February 25, 2017
(Successor)  (Predecessor) (Pro Forma)
Net income$41,394
  $3,463
 $6,395
Interest3,093
  6,566
 2,857
Taxes Expense (Gain)(26,791)  2,071
 4,192
Depreciation/Amortization1,948
  2,474
 1,914
EBITDA19,644
  14,574
 15,358
Business transaction costs1,877
  
 
Stock-based compensation and warrant expense899
  1,656
 872
Transaction Fees / IPO Readiness
  548
 548
Restructuring184
  57
 57
Roark Management Fee
  551
 551
Frozen Licensing Media62
  335
 335
Non-core legal costs403
  272
 272
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability(3,668)  
 
Other (1)(594)  116
 116
Adjusted EBITDA$18,807
  $18,109
 $18,109
_____________________
(1) Other items consist principally of exchange impact of foreign currency transactions as well as minor impacts of channel inventory returns

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation:
(in thousands)
 Thirteen Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
 February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018 February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Net income $12,722
 $41,394
 $27,979
 $51,612
Interest income (884) 
 (1,665) 
Interest expense 3,344
 3,093
 6,605
 6,112
Income tax expense (benefit) 4,027
 (26,791) 8,652
 (20,301)
Depreciation and amortization 1,939
 1,948
 3,825
 3,882
EBITDA 21,148
 19,644
 45,396
 41,305
Business transaction costs 290
 1,877
 1,329
 1,877
Share-based compensation expense 1,417
 899
 2,478
 1,967
Restructuring 22
 184
 22
 430
Non-core legal costs 208
 403
 1,150
 779
Loss (gain) in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability 
 (3,668) 533
 (3,026)
Gain on settlement of TRA liability 
 
 (1,534) 
Other (1)
 (120) (532) 289
 (815)
Adjusted EBITDA $22,965
 $18,807
 $49,663
 $42,517

35



The following unaudited tables below provides a reconciliation(1) Other items consist principally of Adjusted EBITDA to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, which is net income (loss), for the twenty-six week periods ended February 24, 2018 (Successor), February 25, 2017 (Predecessor),exchange impact of foreign currency transactions, frozen licensing media and pro forma period ended February 25, 2017.
Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation:
(in thousands)
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended  Twenty-Six Weeks Ended Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 February 25, 2017
(Successor)  (Predecessor) (Pro Forma)
Net income$51,612
  $10,250
 $15,542
Interest6,112
  13,629
 5,955
Taxes Expense (Gain)(20,301)  6,970
 10,189
Depreciation/Amortization3,882
  4,927
 3,806
EBITDA41,305
  35,776
 35,492
Business transaction costs1,877
  
 
Stock-based compensation and warrant expense1,967
  1,460
 1,744
Transaction Fees / IPO Readiness
  556
 556
Restructuring430
  57
 57
Roark Management Fee
  981
 981
Frozen Licensing Media125
  335
 335
Non-core legal costs779
  455
 455
Gain in fair value change of contingent consideration - TRA liability(3,026)  
 
Other (1)(940)  740
 740
Adjusted EBITDA$42,517
  $40,360
 $40,360
_____________________
(1) Other items consist principally of exchange impact of foreign currency transactions as well as minor impacts of channel inventory returns
other expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

We have historically funded our operations with cash flow from operations and, when needed, with borrowings under our credit facilities. Our principal uses for liquidity have been debt service and working capital.

We had $218.9 million in cash and cash equivalents as of February 23, 2019, which is sufficient to satisfy current liabilities, current maturities of long-term debt, and the interest payments associated with them. We believe our sources of liquidity and capital will be sufficient to finance our continued operations, growth strategy and additional expenses we expect to incur as a public company for at least the next twelve months.

Following the consummation of the Business Combination, we are obligated to make payments under the TRA. Although the actual timing and amount of any payments that may be made under the TRA will vary, the payments that we will be required to make could be significant. Any payments made by us under the TRA will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to us and, to the extent that we are unable to make payments under the TRA for any reason, the unpaid amounts generally will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid by us. See Note 7, Income Taxes, of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the TRA.


3623



Debt and Credit Facilities

On July 7, 2017, the Company entered into a Credit Agreementcredit agreement with Barclays Bank PLC and other parties.parties (the "Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a term facility of $200.0 million (“Term Facility”) with a seven year maturity and (ii) a revolving credit facility of up to $75.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a five year maturity, in each case under the first lien senior secured loan facilities (the “First Lien”).maturity. Substantially concurrentlyconcurrent with the consummation of the Business Combination, the full $200.0 million of the first lien term loanTerm Facility (the “Term Loan”) were drawn, and no revolving loans werewas drawn. The interest rate per annum is based on either (i) a base rate equaling the higher of (a) the “prime rate”, (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (c) the EurocurrencyEuro-currency rate applicable for an interest period of one month plus 1.00% plus (x) 3.00% margin for the Term Loan or (y) 2.00% margin for the Revolving Credit Facility, or (ii) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) adjusted for statutory reserve requirements, plus (x) 4.00% margin for the Term Loan and is subject to a floor of 1.00% or (y) 3.00% margin for the Revolving Credit Facility. The applicable margin for Revolving Credit Facility will be adjusted after the completion of the Company’s first full fiscal quarter after the closing of the Business Combination based upon the Company’s consolidated First Lien net leverage ratio. As security for the payment or performance of its debt, the Company has pledged certain equity interests in its subsidiaries.

The First Lien is subjectOn March 16, 2018 (the “Amendment Date”), the Company entered into an amendment (the “Repricing Amendment”) to mandatory prepayments basedthe Credit Agreement. As a result of the Repricing Amendment, the interest rate on contractual terms. With respect to the Term Loan priorwas reduced and, as of the Amendment Date, such loans bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company's option, either LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 3.50% or a base rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. The Repricing Amendment did not change the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility will continue to bear interest based upon the Company's consolidated net leverage ratio as of the last financial statements delivered to the six-month anniversary of the Closing Date as of July 7, 2017, a 1.00% prepayment premium is payableadministrative agent. No additional debt was incurred, or any proceeds received, by the Company in connection with certain repricing events.the Repricing Amendment. The Company may also voluntarily prepay outstanding loans at any time.incremental fees paid to the administrative agent are reflected as additional debt discount and are amortized over the terms of the long-term financing agreements using the effective-interest method.

The credit facilities governing our debt arrangements containCredit Agreement contains certain financial and other covenants. The revolving credit facility has a maximum total net leverage ratio equal to or less than 6.25:1.00 (with a reduction to 6.00:1.00 on and after the third anniversary of the closing date of the credit facilities) contingent on credit extensions in excess of 30% of the total amount of commitments available under the revolving credit facility, and limitations oncovenants that limit our ability to, among other things, incur and/or undertake asset sales and other dispositions, liens, indebtedness, certain acquisitions and investments, consolidations, mergers, reorganizations and other fundamental changes, payment of dividends and other distributions to equity and warrant holders, and prepayments of material subordinated debt, in each case, subject to customary exceptions materially consistent with credit facilities of such type and size. The Revolving Credit Facility has a maximum total net leverage ratio equal to or less than 6.25:1.00 (with a reduction to 6.00:1.00 on and after the third anniversary of the closing date of the Credit Agreement) contingent on credit extensions in excess of 30% of the total amount of commitments available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Any failure to comply with the restrictions of the credit facilitiesCredit Agreement may result in an event of default. The credit facilities governing our debt arrangements bear interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase, variable rate debt will create higher debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our cash flow. AsCompany was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Company has not drawn on the revolving credit facilityCredit Agreement as of February 24, 2018, no debt covenants were applicable as of the period then ended.23, 2019 and August 25, 2018.

As ofAt February 24, 2018,23, 2019, the outstanding principal balancesbalance of the Term Loan was $199.5$197.5 million and there were no draws have been made onamounts drawn against the $75.0 million Revolving Credit Facility.

Effective March 16, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), Atkins Nutritionals, Inc., Atkins Nutritionals Holdings, Inc., Atkins Nutritionals Holdings II, Inc. and NCP-ATK Holdings, Inc. (collectively, the “Borrower”), each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Simply Good Foods, entered into an amendment (the “Repricing Amendment”) to that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2017, among the Borrower, Barclays Bank PLC (the “Agent”) and the other loan parties and lenders party thereto.Equity Warrants

     As a resultFrom August 26, 2018 through October 5, 2018, public warrants to purchase an aggregate of 9,866,451 shares of the Repricing Amendment,Company's common stock were exercised for cash at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the interest rateCompany of $113.5 million.

On October 4, 2018, the Company delivered a notice for the redemption (the "Redemption Notice") of all of its public warrants that remained unexercised immediately after November 5, 2018. Holders who exercised public warrants following the Redemption Notice were required to do so on a cashless basis. Accordingly, holders were no longer permitted to exercise public warrants in exchange for payment in cash of $11.50 per share. Instead, a holder exercising a public warrant was deemed to have paid the outstanding $200 million Term Loan was reduced and, effective as$11.50 per share exercise price by the surrender of 0.61885 of a share of common stock that the holder would have been entitled to receive upon a cash exercise of each public warrant. Exercising holders received 0.38115 of a share of the Effective Date, such loans bear interest atCompany's common stock for each public warrant surrendered for exercise. Following the Redemption Notice, 3,499,639 public warrants were exercised on a rate equal to, at the Borrower’s option, either LIBOR plus an applicable margincashless basis. An aggregate of 3.50% or a base rate plus an applicable margin of 2.50%. With respect to the Term Loan, prior to the six-month anniversary1,333,848 shares of the Effective Date, a 1.00% prepayment premium is payable by the BorrowerCompany's common stock were issued in connection with certain repricing events. Other thanthese exercises of the prepayment premiums and penalties described above and the payment of customary “breakage” costs, the Borrower may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans at any time. The Repricing Amendment did not change the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility will continue to bear interest based upon the Borrower’s consolidated first lien net leverage ratiopublic warrants. All remaining public warrants were redeemed as of November 5, 2018 for an immaterial amount.

The Company's private warrants to purchase 6,700,000 shares of the last financial statements delivered to the Agent. No additional debt was incurred, or any proceeds received, by the Borrower in connection with the Repricing Amendment.Company's common stock remain outstanding.


3724


Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth the major sources and uses of cash for each of the periods set forth below (in thousands):
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended  Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
February 24, 2018  February 25, 2017 Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Successor)  (Predecessor) February 23, 2019 February 24, 2018
Net cash provided by operating activities$25,351
  $19,387
 $21,831
 $25,351
Net cash used in investing activities$(2,643)  $(21,323) $(887) $(2,643)
Net cash used in financing activities$(269)  $(3,477)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities $86,225
 $(269)

Operating activities. Our net cash provided by operating activities was $25.4$21.8 million for the successor period ended February 24, 2018, an increase23, 2019, a decrease of $6.0$3.5 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $19.4$25.4 million for the predecessor period ended February 25, 2017.24, 2018. The primary difference driving the growth is higher income before taxes. The Company has $79.0 milliondecrease was primarily driven by changes in cash and cash equivalents as of February 24, 2018 which is sufficient to satisfy current liabilities, current maturities of long-term debt, and the interest payments associated with them.working capital.

Investing activities. Our net cash used in investing activities was $2.6$0.9 million for the successor period ended February 24, 2018,23, 2019, which was a decrease in cash used of $18.7$1.8 million compared to the investing activities for the predecessor period ended February 25, 2017.24, 2018. The change wasdecrease is due to a significant investment in capital for the Wellness Foods acquisition related costs of $1.8 million in the prior year predecessor period compared to the working capital adjustment paid in the current year related to the Business Combination and a minor increase in purchases of property, plant and equipment.ended February 24, 2018.

Financing activities. Our net cash provided by financing activities was $86.2 million for the period ended February 23, 2019, compared to net cash used in financing activities primarily relate to the repayment of principal of debt and was $0.3 million for the successor period ended February 24, 2018, compared to $3.5 million2018. Net cash provided by financing activities for the predecessor period ended February 25, 2017.23, 2019 includes $113.5 million of cash received from warrant exercises, and is partially offset by the payment of the TRA liability of $26.5 million and debt principal payments of $1.0 million.

Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations relating to our indebtedness, lease obligations and interest are reported Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report. There were no material changes to our contractual obligations since August 25, 2018.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of February 24, 2018,23, 2019, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, income or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our expected material contractual payment obligations as of February 24, 2018.
  Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations
 ($ in thousands)
 Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years
Long-term debt obligations $199,500
 $2,000
 $4,000
 $4,000
 $189,500
Operating leases (1) 10,081
 2,580
 4,334
 2,734
 433
Interest payments 71,350
 10,712
 22,884
 20,671
 17,083
Total $280,931
 $15,292
 $31,218
 $27,405
 $207,016
_______________
(1)As of February 24, 2018, the Company is obligated under multiple non-cancelable operating leases, which continue through 2023. Rent expenses, inclusive of real estate taxes, utilities and maintenance incurred under operating leases, are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. For the thirteen weeks ended February 24, 2018 and February 25, 2017, rent expenses for the successor entity were $0.6 million and for the predecessor entity were $0.3 million, respectively. For the twenty-six weeks ended February 24, 2018 and February 25, 2017, rent expenses for the successor entity were $1.2 million and for the predecessor entity were $0.9 million, respectively.

New Accounting Pronouncements

 For a description of critical accounting policies that affect our significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, refer to our Annual Report. The adoption of ASC Topic 606 resulted in a change to our revenue recognition accounting policy, as discussed in Note 3 of our condensed consolidated financial statements in this report. There have been no other significant changes to our critical accounting policies since August 26, 2017.25, 2018. Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies2 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statementscondensed consolidated financial statements in this filingReport for further information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

38




Tax Cuts and JobsJOBS Act

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act") was signed into law. The change in the tax law will be partially effective in our current 2018 fiscal year and fully effective in our 2019 fiscal year. The primary impacts to the Company include repeal of the alternative minimum tax regime, decrease of the corporate income tax rate structure, and net operating loss limitations.  These changes will have a material impact to the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities, the value of the Company’s TRA, and the Company’s future taxable income and effective tax rate.

Additionally, our preliminary assessment indicates the enacted changes in the corporate tax rate and calculation of taxable income will have a favorable effect on our financial condition, profitability, and cash flows. As of February 24, 2018, the Company has booked provisional estimates of the impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act with the help of its professional advisers. Until such analysis is complete, the full impact of the new tax law on the Company in future periods is uncertain, and no assurances can be made by the Company on any potential impacts. Refer to Note 7 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this filing for further information regarding recently issued law.

JOBS Act

Simply Good Foods qualifies as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the provisions of the JOBS Act, enacted on April 5, 2012. Section 102 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. However, Simply Good Foods is choosinghas elected to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, Simply Good Foods will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Simply Good Foods’ decision to opt out of the extended transition period is irrevocable.

25




Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, Simply Good Foods is not required to, among other things, (1) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our systems of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404, (2) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (3) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis), and (4) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply until Simply Good Foods no longer meets the requirements of being an emerging growth company. Simply Good Foods will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of Conyers Park’s initial public offering, which was July 20, 2016, (ii) in which Simply Good Foods has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion or (iii) in which Simply Good Foods is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of its common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of its prior second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior 3-year period. We expect to cease being an emerging growth company as of the end of our fiscal year ending August 31, 2019.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There were no material changes in our market risk exposure during the thirteen week period ended February 24, 2018.23, 2019.  For a discussion of our market risks, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosures.

Management, including the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, ouras of February 23, 2019, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures

39


Table of Contents

were effective as of February 24, 2018. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable but not absolute assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. The design of any disclosure control and procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The design and implementation of internal control over financial reporting for the Company post-Business Combination has required and will continue to require significant time and resources from management and other personnel. WeThere were engaged in the process of the design and implementation of our internal control over financial reporting in a manner commensurate with the scale of our operations post-Business Combination. Except for the activities described above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the twenty-six week periodquarter ended February 24, 201823, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Additionally, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

26



PART IIII. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we have been and may again become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any litigation that we believe to be material and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

YouReaders should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, cash flows or future results. Except as set forth below, thereThere have been no material changes in our risk factors included in our Annual Report. The risks described in our Annual Report are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.
We will be required to be compliant with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 if we fail to continue to qualify as an emerging growth company, which could lead to increased costs to comply with regulatory requirements.

                For as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. We may remain an emerging growth company until July 20, 2021, provided that prior to July 20, 2021, if the market value of our common stock that is held by non‑affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of our second fiscal quarter at any time or if we have annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more in any fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the last Saturday in August of the applicable year. We also would cease to be an emerging growth company if we issue more than $1 billion of non‑convertible debt over a three‑year period.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, public companies are required to furnish a report by management on its internal control over financial reporting. However, while we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we lose our status as an emerging growth company sooner than anticipated, we may need to accelerate our efforts to comply with Section 404, which may lead to increased costs and resources to complete the process. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that we will not be able to conclude, within the prescribed time frame or at all, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404. If we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

40



The recently passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act may have a significant impact on our Company.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was signed into law. The change in the tax law will be partially effective in our current 2018 fiscal year and fully effective in our 2019 fiscal year. The primary impacts to the Company include repeal of the alternative minimum tax regime, decrease of the corporate income tax rate structure, and net operating loss limitations.  These changes will have a material impact to the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities, the value of the Company’s TRA, and the Company’s future taxable income and effective tax rate.

Additionally, our preliminary assessment indicates the enacted changes in the corporate tax rate and calculation of taxable income will have a favorable effect on our financial condition, profitability, and cash flows. As of February 24, 2018, the Company has booked provisional estimates of the impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act with the help of its professional advisers. Until such analysis is complete, the full impact of the new tax law on the Company in future periods is uncertain, and no assurances can be made by the Company on any potential impacts. Refer to Note 7 of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this filing for further information regarding recently issued law.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchase as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)
 Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
November 25, 2018 -
December 29, 2018
 
 
 
 $50,000,000
December 30, 3018 -
January 26, 2019
 
 
 
 $50,000,000
January 27, 2019 -
February 23, 2019
 6,729
 $18.92
 6,729
 $49,872,687
Total 6,729
 $18.92
 6,729
 $49,872,687

(1)
On November 13, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved and authorized a $50.0 million stock repurchase program. As of February 23, 2019, approximately $49.9 million remained available for repurchase under the stock repurchase program. Under the stock repurchase program, the Company may repurchase shares from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The stock repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares or acquire shares over any specific period of time. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time by the Company, and does not have an expiration date.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.


27


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No. Document
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
10.1
31.1 
31.2 
32.1 
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


4128


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
     
    By:
THE SIMPLY GOOD FOODS COMPANY

/s/ Timothy A. Matthews
Date:April 10, 20184, 2019 Name:Timothy A. Matthews
   Title:Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer
    (Principal Accounting Officer)



4229