Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Loans Receivable. Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees and costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans. The Bank is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the loan.
The loans receivable portfolio is segmented into residential loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans and consumer loans. The residential loan segment has two classes: one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans and one-to-four residential family non-owner occupied loans. The commercial real estate loan segment consists of the following classes: multi-family (five or more) residential, commercial real estate and commercial lines of credit. Construction loans are generally granted for the purpose of building a single residential home. The consumer loan segment consists of the following classes: home equity loans and consumer non-real estate loans. Included in the home equity class are home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. Included in the consumer non-real estate loans are loans secured by saving accounts and auto loans.
The accrual of interest is generally discontinued when principal or interest has become 90 days past due unless the loan is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans receivable. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment. Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.
A loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner-occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Loans Held for Sale. Loans originated by the Bank’s mortgage banking subsidiary, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, are intended for sale in the secondary market and are carried at the lower of cost or fair value (LOCOM). Gains and losses on loan sales (sales proceeds minus carrying value) are recorded in noninterest income, and direct loan origination costs and fees are deferred at origination of the loan and are recognized in noninterest income upon sale of the loan.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system to hold restricted stock of its district Federal Home Loan Bank according to a predetermined formula. FHLB stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. When evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the stock. We evaluate our holdings of FHLB stock for impairment each reporting period. No impairment charges were recognized on FHLB stock during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and restricting the repurchase of capital stock, to preserve capital. On October 29, 2010, the FHLB of Pittsburgh resumed the repurchase of capital stock. From October 29, 2010 through March 31, 2012 a total of 211,400 shares have been repurchased at $1.00 per share from the Bank. In February 2012, the FHLB of Pittsburgh also announced a dividend of 0.10 percent annualized calculated on the stockholders’ average capital stock held during the period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011. This dividend was paid in February 2012.
Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned or foreclosed assets are comprised of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure and loans classified as in-substance foreclosures. A loan is classified as in-substance foreclosure when the Bank has taken possession of the collateral regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place. Other real estate properties are initially recorded at fair value, net of estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the real estate is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Net
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
revenue and expenses from operations and additions to the valuation allowance are included in other expenses. Other real estate owned at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $25,000 and $185,000, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation. Compensation expense for share-based compensation awards is based on the grant date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
At March 31, 2012, the Company has two share-based plans; the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”) and the 2008 Stock Option Plan. Awards under both plans were made in May 2008. These plans are more fully described in Note 8.
The Company also has an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”). This plan is more fully described in Note 8. As ESOP shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares over the period earned.
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
Earnings per Share. Amounts reported in earnings per share reflect earnings available to common stockholders’ for the period divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, exclusive of unearned ESOP shares, unvested restricted stock (RRP) shares and treasury shares. Stock options and unvested restricted stock are regarded as potential common stock and are considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they would have a dilutive effect if converted to common stock, computed using the “treasury stock” method. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, all outstanding stock options (107,570 options) were antidilutive.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 (Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs). This update amends FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, to bring U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements in line with International Accounting Standards. The update clarifies existing guidance for items such as: the application of the highest and best use concept to non-financial assets and liabilities; the application of fair value measurement to financial instruments classified in a reporting entity’s stockholder’s equity; and disclosure requirements regarding quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of level 3 assets. The Update also creates an exception to Topic 820 for entities which carry financial instruments within a portfolio or group, under which the entity is now permitted to base the price used for fair valuation upon a price that would be received to sell the net asset position or transfer a net liability position in an orderly transaction. The update also allows for the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement if the financial instrument is categorized in level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Lastly, the ASU contains new disclosure requirements regarding fair value amounts categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy such as: disclosure of the valuation process used; effects of and relationships between unobservable inputs; usage of nonfinancial assets for purposes other than their highest and best use when that is the basis of the disclosed fair value; and categorization by level of items disclosed at fair value, but not measured at fair value for financial statement purposes. For public entities, this update is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations but expanded disclosures relating to fair value.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The intent of this standard is to increase the prominence of comprehensive income in the financial statements. This standard requires the components of comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single format would include the traditional income statement and the components of other comprehensive income, total other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income. In the two statement approach, the first statement would be the traditional income statement, which would be immediately followed by a separate statement which would include the components of other comprehensive income, total other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income. The amendments in this ASU will be applied retrospectively, and will be required for the Company beginning in the first quarter 2012. The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Reclassifications. Certain items in the 2011 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in the 2012 consolidated financial statements. Such reclassifications did not have a material impact on the presentation of the overall financial statements.
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
The following tables summarize information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | March 31, 2012 | |
| | | Recorded Investment | | | Unpaid Principal Balance | | | Related Allowance | | | Average Recorded Investment | | | Interest Income Recognized | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 808 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 3 | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 175 | | | | 175 | | | | - | | | | 176 | | | | 3 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | 200 | | | | 200 | | | | - | | | | 200 | | | | 1 | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 169 | | | | 169 | | | | - | | | | 169 | | | | 2 | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 457 | | | | 457 | | | | - | | | | 460 | | | | 8 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 815 | | | | 815 | | | | 105 | | | | 815 | | | | 6 | |
| Multi-family residential and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Commercial real estate | | | 389 | | | | 389 | | | | 59 | | | | 389 | | | | - | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 97 | | | | 97 | | | | 42 | | | | 97 | | | | 1 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 808 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 3 | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 990 | | | | 990 | | | | 105 | | | | 991 | | | | 9 | |
| Multi-family residential and lines of credit | | | 200 | | | | 200 | | | | - | | | | 200 | | | | 1 | |
| Commercial real estate | | | 558 | | | | 558 | | | | 59 | | | | 558 | | | | 2 | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 554 | | | | 554 | | | | 42 | | | | 557 | | | | 9 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
| | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | Recorded Investment | | | Unpaid Principal Balance | | | Related Allowance | | | Average Recorded Investment | | | Interest Income Recognized | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| With no related allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 861 | | | $ | 861 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 867 | | | $ | 16 | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 424 | | | | 424 | | | | - | | | | 427 | | | | 27 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 38 | | | | 38 | | | | - | | | | 38 | | | | 1 | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 480 | | | | 480 | | | | - | | | | 487 | | | | 24 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| With an allowance recorded: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 816 | | | | 816 | | | | 91 | | | | 820 | | | | 32 | |
| Multi-family residential and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Commercial real estate | | | 389 | | | | 389 | | | | 36 | | | | 390 | | | | 16 | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 97 | | | | 97 | | | | 42 | | | | 99 | | | | 5 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 861 | | | $ | 861 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 867 | | | $ | 16 | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 1,240 | | | | 1,240 | | | | 91 | | | | 1,247 | | | | 59 | |
| Multi-family residential and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Commercial real estate | | | 427 | | | | 427 | | | | 36 | | | | 428 | | | | 17 | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 577 | | | | 577 | | | | 42 | | | | 586 | | | | 29 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At March 31, 2012, the Company had eight loans totaling $625,000 identified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). All eight loans are classified as impaired with one loan in the amount of $71,000 on non-accrual status. Any TDR that is placed on non-accrual is not reverted back to accruing status until the borrower makes timely payments as contracted for at least six months and future collection under the revised terms is probable. None of the restructurings were made under a government assistance program. These restructurings were allowed in an effort to maximize the Company’s ability to collect on loans where borrowers were experiencing financial difficulty. All the Company’s TDRs as of March 31, 2012 have modifications with terms of interest-only payments for a period of six months. In some cases the modification terms may include a small payment of principal in addition to interest. The following table presents the Company’s TDR loans as of March 31, 2012 (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | March 31, 2012 | |
| | | Number of Contracts | | | Recorded Investment | | | Non- Accrual | | | Accruing | | | Related Allowance | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | | 1 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 4 | | | | 305 | | | | - | | | | 305 | | | | 18 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 3 | | | | 249 | | | | - | | | | 249 | | | | 1 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total | | | 8 | | | $ | 625 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 554 | | | $ | 19 | |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
| | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | Number of Contracts | | | Recorded Investment | | | Non- Accrual | | | Accruing | | | Related Allowance | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | | 1 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 5 | | | | 617 | | | | - | | | | 617 | | | | 12 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | 3 | | | | 249 | | | | - | | | | 249 | | | | 1 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total | | | 9 | | | $ | 937 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 866 | | | $ | 13 | |
The contractual aging of the TDRs in the table above as of March 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
| | | March 31, 2012 | |
| | | Current & Past Due Less than 30 Days | | | Past Due 30-89 Days | | | Greater | | | Non- Accrual | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 71 | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | - | | | | - | | | | 305 | | | | - | | | | 305 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Construction | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Home equity | | | - | | | | 182 | | | | 67 | | | | - | | | | 249 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total | | $ | - | | | $ | 182 | | | $ | 372 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 625 | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2012 there were no new TDRs identified and one loan identified as a TDR at December 31, 2011, in the amount of $310,000, was removed from TDR status as the borrower fulfilled the terms of the loan modification and has been making regular payments in accordance with the original loan terms for more than six months.
The reserve for an impaired TDR loan is based upon the present value of the future expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective rate or upon the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell, if the loan is deemed collateral dependent. At March 31, 2012 there were no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors whose terms have been modified as TDRs.
The general practice of the Bank is to work with borrowers so that they are able to pay back their loan in full. If a borrower continues to be delinquent or cannot meet the terms of a TDR modification and the loan is determined to be uncollectible, the loan will be charged off. As March 31, 2012 all of our loans classified as TDRs were performing in accordance with their modified terms.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary, by loan portfolio class, of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and recorded investment in loans receivable as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | March 31, 2012 | |
| | | 1-4 Family | | | 1-4 Family | | | | | | Commercial | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Residential | | | Residential | | | Multi- | | | Real Estate | | | | | | | | | Consumer | | | | | | | |
| | | Owner | | | Non-Owner | | | Family | | | and Lines of | | | | | | Home | | | Non-Real | | | | | | | |
| | | Occupied | | | Occupied | | | Residential | | | Credit | | | Construction | | | Equity | | | Estate | | | Unallocated | | | Total | |
| Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 351 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 805 | |
| Charge-offs | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3 | ) |
| Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Provision | | | (7 | ) | | | 24 | | | | (2 | ) | | | 34 | | | | 7 | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | 10 | | | | 71 | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 107 | | | $ | 375 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 182 | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 873 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Individually | | $ | - | | | $ | 105 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 59 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 206 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Collectively | | $ | 107 | | | $ | 270 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 123 | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 43 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 57 | | | $ | 667 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loans receivable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 11,310 | | | $ | 30,560 | | | $ | 3,378 | | | $ | 21,432 | | | $ | 6,379 | | | $ | 5,731 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 78,883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Individually | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 990 | | | $ | 200 | | | $ | 558 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 554 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,110 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Collectively | | $ | 10,502 | | | $ | 29,570 | | | $ | 3,178 | | | $ | 20,874 | | | $ | 6,379 | | | $ | 5,177 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 75,773 | |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary, by loan portfolio class, of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2011 and recorded investment in loans receivable as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | 1-4 Family | | | 1-4 Family | | | | | | Commercial | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Residential | | | Residential | | | Multi- | | | Real Estate | | | | | | | | | Consumer | | | | | | | |
| | | Owner | | | Non-Owner | | | Family | | | and Lines of | | | | | | Home | | | Non-Real | | | | | | | |
| | | Occupied | | | Occupied | | | Residential | | | Credit | | | Construction | | | Equity | | | Estate | | | Unallocated | | | Total | |
| Allowance for loan losses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 185 | | | $ | 335 | | | $ | 23 | | | $ | 155 | | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 40 | | | $ | 871 | |
| Charge-offs | | | (93 | ) | | | (110 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (203 | ) |
| Recoveries | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Provision | | | 22 | | | | 126 | | | | 3 | | | | (7 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | (9 | ) | | | - | | | | 7 | | | | 137 | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 351 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 148 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 83 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 805 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Individually | | $ | - | | | $ | 91 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 36 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 169 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Collectively | | $ | 114 | | | $ | 260 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 112 | | | $ | 35 | | | $ | 41 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 47 | | | $ | 636 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loans receivable: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 12,153 | | | $ | 29,606 | | | $ | 3,715 | | | $ | 19,854 | | | $ | 5,263 | | | $ | 5,491 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 76,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance evaluated for impairment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Individually | | $ | 861 | | | $ | 1,240 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 427 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 577 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,105 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Collectively | | $ | 11,292 | | | $ | 28,366 | | | $ | 3,715 | | | $ | 19,427 | | | $ | 5,263 | | | $ | 4,914 | | | $ | 100 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 73,077 | |
The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 808 | | | $ | 808 | |
| One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 684 | | | | 624 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | 200 | | | | -- | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 558 | | | | 427 | |
| Construction | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Home equity | | | 234 | | | | 256 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| | | $ | 2,484 | | | $ | 2,115 | |
Non-performing loans, which consist of non-accruing loans plus accruing loans 90 days or more past due, amounted to $3.4 million and $3.3 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. For the delinquent loans in our portfolio, we have considered our ability to collect the past due interest, as well as the principal balance of the loan, in order to determine whether specific loans should be placed on non-accrual status. In cases where our evaluations have determined that the principal and interest balances are collectible, we have continued to accrue interest.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, approximately $16,000 and $9,000 of interest income was recognized on non-accrual loans. Interest income foregone on non-accrual loans was approximately $28,000 and $22,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | |
| | | | | | Greater | | | | | | | | | | | | Loans Receivable > 90 Days and Accruing | |
| | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 649 | | | $ | 819 | | | $ | 1,468 | | | $ | 9,842 | | | $ | 11,310 | | | $ | 11 | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 1,300 | | | | 989 | | | | 2,289 | | | | 28,271 | | | | 30,560 | | | | 305 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | -- | | | | 200 | | | | 200 | | | | 3,178 | | | | 3,378 | | | | -- | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 510 | | | | 946 | | | | 1,456 | | | | 19,976 | | | | 21,432 | | | | 388 | |
| Construction | | | 240 | | | | -- | | | | 240 | | | | 6,139 | | | | 6,379 | | | | -- | |
| Home equity | | | 416 | | | | 405 | | | | 821 | | | | 4,910 | | | | 5,731 | | | | 171 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | 21 | | | | -- | | | | 21 | | | | 72 | | | | 93 | | | | -- | |
| | | $ | 3,136 | | | $ | 3,359 | | | $ | 6,495 | | | $ | 72,388 | | | $ | 78,883 | | | $ | 875 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | Greater | | | | | | | | | | | | Loans Receivable > 90 Days and Accruing | |
| | | | |
| One-to-four family residential owner occupied | | $ | 1,009 | | | $ | 861 | | | $ | 1,870 | | | $ | 10,283 | | | $ | 12,153 | | | $ | 53 | |
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied | | | 407 | | | | 993 | | | | 1,400 | | | | 28,206 | | | | 29,606 | | | | 369 | |
| Multi-family residential | | | -- | | | | 201 | | | | 201 | | | | 3,514 | | | | 3,715 | | | | 201 | |
| Commercial real estate and lines of credit | | | 1,154 | | | | 834 | | | | 1,988 | | | | 17,866 | | | | 19,854 | | | | 407 | |
| Construction | | | 80 | | | | -- | | | | 80 | | | | 5,183 | | | | 5,263 | | | | -- | |
| Home equity | | | 524 | | | | 440 | | | | 964 | | | | 4,527 | | | | 5,491 | | | | 184 | |
| Consumer non-real estate | | | 11 | | | | -- | | | | 11 | | | | 89 | | | | 100 | | | | -- | |
| | | $ | 3,185 | | | $ | 3,329 | | | $ | 6,514 | | | $ | 69,668 | | | $ | 76,182 | | | $ | 1,214 | |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Deposits
Deposits consist of the following classifications (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Passbook savings accounts | | $ | 2,946 | | | $ | 2,943 | |
| | Statement savings accounts | | | 6,244 | | | | 6,975 | |
| | eSavings accounts | | | 4,917 | | | | 3,924 | |
| | Certificates of deposit | | | 72,252 | | | | 74,683 | |
| | Total deposits | | $ | 86,359 | | | $ | 88,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Note 7 – Borrowings
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of the following at March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | Maturity Period | | Amount | | | Weighted Interest Rate | |
| | 1 to 12 months | | $ | 1,800 | | | | 3.98 | % |
| | 13 to 24 months | | | 2,000 | | | | 4.19 | % |
| | Total | | $ | 3,800 | | | | 4.09 | % |
Note 8 – Stock Compensation Plans
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) during fiscal 2007 for the benefit of employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the plan. Using proceeds from a loan from the Company, the ESOP purchased 8%, or 111,090 shares of the Company’s then outstanding common stock in the open market at an average price of $9.35 for a total of $1.0 million. The Bank makes cash contributions to the ESOP on a quarterly basis sufficient to enable the ESOP to make the required loan payments to the Company. The loan bears an interest rate of 7.75% per annum, with principal and interest to be paid quarterly in equal installments over 15 years. The loan is secured by the unallocated shares of common stock held by the ESOP.
Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the ESOP are held in a suspense account and reported as unallocated common stock held by the ESOP in stockholders’ equity until released for allocation to participants. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral and are allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each such participant’s base compensation to the total base compensation of eligible plan participants. As the unearned shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market value of the shares, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations. During the three months March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, the Company recognized $16,000 and $18,000 of ESOP expense, respectively.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Recognition & Retention Plan
In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (the “RRP”) and Trust Agreement. In order to fund the RRP, the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan Trust (the “RRP Trust”) acquired 55,545 shares of the Company’s stock in the open market at an average price of $9.36 totaling $520,000. Pursuant to the RRP, 43,324 shares acquired by the RRP Trust were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008, with 12,221 shares remaining available for future grant. Due to forfeiture of shares by certain employees in addition to unawarded shares, as of March 31, 2012, 12,459 shares remain available for future grant. The RRP share awards have vesting periods from five to seven years.
A summary of the status of the shares under the RRP as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| | | Number of | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Number of | | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
| Unvested at the beginning of the year | | | 17,440 | | | $ | 9.05 | | | | 25,969 | | | $ | 9.05 | |
| Granted | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Vested | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Forfeited | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Unvested at the end of the period | | | 17,440 | | | $ | 9.05 | | | | 25,969 | | | $ | 9.05 | |
The weighted average grant date fair value is the last sale price as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on May 14, 2008. Compensation expense on the RRP shares granted is recognized ratably over the five to seven year vesting period in an amount which is equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, $19,000 in compensation expense was recognized, respectively. A tax benefit of approximately $6,000 was recognized during each of these periods. As of March 31, 2012, approximately $90,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 1.2 years.
Stock Options
In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”). The Option Plan authorizes the grant of stock options to officers, employees and directors of the Company to acquire 138,863 shares of common stock with an exercise price no less than the fair market value on the date of the grant. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined to grant the stock options in May 2008 at an exercise price equal to $10.00 per share which is higher than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. All incentive stock options issued under the Option Plan are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Options will become vested and exercisable over a five to seven year period and are generally exercisable for a period of ten years after the grant date. Pursuant to the Option Plan, 108,311 stock options were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008. Due to forfeiture of stock options by certain employees in addition to unawarded stock options, as of March 31, 2012, 31,293 stock options remain available for future grant.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Stock Options (Continued)
A summary of option activity under the Company’s Option Plan as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
| | | 2012 | | | |
| | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | | Number of Shares | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| Outstanding at the beginning of the year | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 6.4 | | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
| Granted | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Exercised | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | |
| Forfeited | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | -- | | | | 10.00 | |
| Outstanding at the end of the period | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 107,570 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
| Exercisable at the end of the period | | | 63,999 | | | $ | 10.00 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 42,666 | | | $ | 10.00 | |
During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, $11,000 and $10,000 in compensation expense was recognized, respectively. A tax benefit of approximately $2,000 was recognized during each of these periods. As of March 31, 2012, approximately $48,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 1.2 years.
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements
Fair value estimates are based on quoted market prices, if available, quoted market prices of similar assets or liabilities, or the present value of expected future cash flows and other valuation techniques. These valuations are significantly affected by discount rates, cash flow assumptions, and risk assumptions used. Therefore, fair value estimates may not be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and are not intended to reflect the proceeds that may be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instruments.
Fair value is determined at one point in time and is not representative of future value. These amounts do not reflect the total value of a going concern organization. Management does not have the intention to dispose of a significant portion of its assets and liabilities and therefore, the unrealized gains or losses should not be interpreted as a forecast of future earnings and cash flows.
The following is a discussion of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and valuation techniques applied:
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities Available-For-Sale: The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
We may be required from time to time to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Impaired Loans: Impaired loans are carried at the lower of cost or the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans. Collateral is primarily in the form of real estate. The use of independent appraisals, discounted cash flow models and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral and impaired loans are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of the investment in the real estate or the fair value of the real estate less estimated selling costs. The use of independent appraisals and management’s best judgment are significant inputs in arriving at the fair value measure of the underlying collateral and therefore other real estate owned is classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The tables set forth below the financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |
| | | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| Recurring fair value measurements | | | |
| Investment securities available for sale | | | |
| U.S. Government agency securities | | $ | 3,950 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,950 | | | $ | - | |
| FNMA pass-through certificates | | | 2,117 | | | | - | | | | 2,117 | | | | - | |
| FHLMC pass-through certificates | | | 1,825 | | | | - | | | | 1,825 | | | | - | |
| Corporate securities | | | 1,714 | | | | 1,714 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Short-term bond fund | | | 1,096 | | | | 1,096 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Limited-term bond fund | | | 515 | | | | 515 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total investment securities available for sale | | $ | 11,217 | | | $ | 3,325 | | | $ | 7,892 | | | $ | - | |
| Total recurring fair value measurements | | $ | 11,217 | | | $ | 3,325 | | | $ | 7,892 | | | $ | - | |
| Nonrecurring fair value measurements | | | |
| Impaired loans | | $ | 1,095 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,095 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other real estate owned | | | 25 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 25 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total nonrecurring fair value measurements | | $ | 1,120 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,120 | |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The tables set forth below the financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for on a recurring and nonrecurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |
| | | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| Recurring fair value measurements | | | |
| Investment securities available for sale | | | |
| U.S. Government agency securities | | $ | 3,457 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,457 | | | $ | - | |
| Corporate securities | | | 1,668 | | | | 1,668 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Short-term bond fund | | | 1,070 | | | | 1,070 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Limited-term bond fund | | | 512 | | | | 512 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total investment securities available for sale | | $ | 6,707 | | | $ | 3,250 | | | $ | 3,457 | | | $ | - | |
| Total recurring fair value measurements | | $ | 6,707 | | | $ | 3,250 | | | $ | 3,457 | | | $ | - | |
| Nonrecurring fair value measurements | | | |
| Impaired loans | | $ | 1,133 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,133 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other real estate owned | | | 185 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 185 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total nonrecurring fair value measurements | | $ | 1,318 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,318 | |
The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Company has used level 3 inputs to determine fair value as of March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| | |
| | Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
| | | Total Fair | | Valuation | Unobservable | Range (Weighted |
| | | Value | | Techniques | Input | Average) |
| Impaired loans | | $ | 1,095 | | Appraisal of | Appraisal | 0% to -58% (-18%) |
| | | | | collateral (1) | adjustments (2) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Liquidation | (-8%) |
| | | | | | expenses (2) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Other real estate owned | | | 25 | | Appraisal of | | |
| | | | | collateral (1)(3) | | |
| (1) | Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisal of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are identifiable. |
| (2) | Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percentage of the appraisal. |
| (3) | Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses. |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | Fair Value Measurements at | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 3) | |
| Financial Assets | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3,208 | | | $ | 3,208 | | | $ | 3,208 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| Investment in interest-earning time deposits | | | 8,093 | | | | 8,200 | | | | - | | | | 8,200 | | | | - | |
Investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale | | | 11,217 | | | | 11,217 | | | | 3,325 | | | | 7,892 | | | | - | |
| Loans held for sale | | | 3,378 | | | | 3,461 | | | | - | | | | 3,461 | | | | - | |
| Loans receivable, net | | | 77,950 | | | | 79,582 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 79,582 | |
| Investment in FHLB stock | | | 585 | | | | 585 | | | | - | | | | 585 | | | | - | |
| Accrued interest receivable | | | 615 | | | | 615 | | | | 615 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deposits | | | 86,359 | | | | 87,860 | | | | 13,016 | | | | 73,754 | | | | - | |
| FHLB advances, long-term | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,093 | | | | | | | | 2,093 | | | | | |
| FHLB advances, short-term | | | 1,800 | | | | 1,800 | | | | | | | | 1,800 | | | | | |
| Accrued interest payable | | | 96 | | | | 96 | | | | 96 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Financial Assets | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 11,687 | | | $ | 11,687 | |
| Investment in interest-earning time deposits | | | 8,082 | | | | 8,178 | |
| Investment securities available for sale | | | 6,707 | | | | 6,707 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity | | | 3,888 | | | | 4,248 | |
| Loans held for sale | | | 413 | | | | 418 | |
| Loans receivable, net | | | 75,339 | | | | 77,005 | |
| Investment in FHLB stock | | | 616 | | | | 616 | |
| Accrued interest receivable | | | 543 | | | | 543 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
| Deposits | | | 88,525 | | | | 90,106 | |
| FHLB advances, long-term | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,105 | |
| FHLB advances, short-term | | | 1,800 | | | | 1,800 | |
Accrued interest payable | | | 98 | | | | 98 | |
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
The following methods and assumptions were used to measure the fair value of financial instruments recorded at cost on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.
Interest Earning Time Deposits. Fair values for interest-earning time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.
Loans Held for Sale. Fair values of loans held for sale are based on committments on hand from investors at prevailing market rates.
Loans Receivable, Net. The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow methodology. The discount rates take into account interest rates currently being offered to customers for loans with similar terms, the credit risk associated with the loan and market factors, including liquidity. The valuation of the loan portfolio reflects discounts that the Company believes are consistent with transactions occurring in the market place for both performing and distressed loan types. The carrying value that fair value is compared to is net of the allowance for loan losses and other associated premiums and discounts. Due to the significant judgment involved in evaluating credit quality, loans are classified with level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. The carrying amount of restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.
Accrued Interest Receivable. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.
Deposits. The carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value for demand savings deposit accounts. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by a discounted cash flow method using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar maturities.
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings. Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated based on rates currently available to the Company for similar terms and remaining maturities.
Accrued Interest Receivable. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments. Off-balance sheet financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit. Fair values for commitments to extend credit are estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the present credit standing of the counterparties. The estimated fair value of the commitments to extend credit are insignificant and therefore are not presented in the above table.
| ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements Are Subject to Change
We make certain statements in this document as to what we expect may happen in the future. These statements usually contain the words "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," "anticipate," "intend" or similar expressions. Because these statements look to the future, they are based on our current expectations and beliefs. Actual results or events may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. You should be aware that our current expectations and beliefs as to future events are subject to change at any time, and we can give you no assurances that the future events will actually occur.
General
The Company was formed in connection with the Bank’s conversion to a stock savings bank completed on July 3, 2007. The Company’s results of operations are dependent primarily on the results of the Bank, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Bank’s results of operations depend, to a large extent, on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan and investment portfolios and the cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by provisions for loan losses, fee income and other non-interest income and non-interest expense. Non-interest expense principally consists of compensation, directors’ fees and expenses, office occupancy and equipment expense, professional fees, FDIC deposit insurance assessment and other expenses. Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.
At March 31, 2012 the Bank had four subsidiaries, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, Quaint Oak Real Estate, LLC, Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, and Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, each a Pennsylvania limited liability company. The mortgage, real estate and abstract companies offer mortgage banking, real estate sales and title abstract services, respectively, in the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania, and began operation in July 2009. The insurance agency is currently inactive. The mortgage company also began operating at our main office in October 2010. In connection with the expansion into these activities, the Company acquired an office building in Allentown, Pennsylvania from which the subsidiaries operate. The Bank also opened a new branch office at this location in February 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements require certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions, which are believed to be reasonable, based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the periods presented. The following accounting policies comprise those that management believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. These policies require numerous estimates or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or may be subject to variations which may significantly affect our reported results and financial condition for the period or in future periods.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment. Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.
A loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner-occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities. Securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. To determine whether a loss in value is other-than-temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline and whether or not management intends to sell or expects that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery of the fair value. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value for a debt security is determined to be other-than-temporary, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, except for equity securities, where the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings.
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. The realization of our deferred tax assets principally depends upon our achieving projected future taxable income. We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and other factors. We may adjust our deferred tax asset balances if our judgments change.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
General. The Company’s total assets at March 31, 2012 were $107.1 million, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 1.9%, from $109.2 million at December 31, 2011. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $8.5 million as this liquidity was used to fund increases in loans held for sale of $3.0 million and loans receivable, net of $2.6 million, purchase a $500,000 investment security available for sale, and cover net deposit outflows of $2.2 million. Investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale increased $4.5 million in total since December 31, 2011 as $3.6 million of mortgage-backed securities designated as held-to-maturity were transferred into the available for sale category at the end of the first quarter in anticipation of their sale.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $8.5 million, or 72.6%, from $11.7 million at December 31, 2011 to $3.2 million at March 31, 2012 as excess liquidity was used to fund loans, purchase investment securities, and cover deposit outflows.
Investment and Mortgage-backed Securities. Investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale increased $4.5 million, or 67.2%, to $11.2 million at March 31, 2012 from $6.7 million at December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the transfer of $3.6 million of mortgage-backed securities designated as held-to-maturity into the available for sale category at the end of the first quarter in anticipation of their sale. Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity decreased from $3.9 million at December 31, 2011 to none at March 31, 2012 due to $299,000 of principal payments on these securities and the transfer of remaining $3.6 million to the available for sale category. In the second quarter of 2012, the Company sold these mortgage-backed securities and realized an after-tax gain of approximately $198,000.
Loans Held for Sale. Loans held for sale increased to $3.0 million at March 31, 2012 from $413,000 at December 31, 2011 as the Bank’s mortgage banking subsidiary, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, originated $5.2 million of one-to-four family residential loans during the period ending March 31, 2012 and sold $2.3 million of these loans in the secondary market during this same period.
Loans Receivable, Net. Loans receivable, net, increased $2.6 million, or 3.5%, to $77.95 million at March 31, 2012 from $75.34 million December 31, 2011. This increase was funded primarily from excess liquidity in cash and cash equivalents. Increases within the portfolio occurred in the commercial real estate loan category which increased $1.4 million, or 7.8%, construction loans which increased $1.1 million or 21.2%, one-to-four family residential non-owner occupied loans which increased $954,000, or 3.2%, home equity loans which increased $240,000, or 4.4%, and commercial lines of credit which increased $154,000, or 9.3%. These increases were partially offset by decreases of $843,000, or 6.9%, in residential mortgage one-to-four family owner occupied loans and $337,000, or 9.1%, in multi-family residential loans. The Company continues its strategy of diversifying its loan portfolio with higher yielding and shorter-term loan products and selling substantially all of its newly originated one-to-four family owner-occupied loans into the secondary market.
Premises and Equipment, Net. Premises and equipment, net, increase $297,000, or 26.4%, to $1.4 million at March 31, 2012 from $1.1 million at December 31, 2011 primarily due to the capital expenditures made during the three months ended March 31, 2012 in connection with the Company’s move to its new facility at 501 Knowles Avenue in Southampton, Pennsylvania in late March 2012.
Other Real Estate Owned, Net. Other real estate owned, net, decreased $160,000, or 86.5%, to $25,000 at March 31, 2012 from $185,000 at December 31, 2011. This decrease was due to the sale of two properties during the three months ended March 31, 2012.
Deposits. Total interest-bearing deposits decreased $2.2 million, or 2.4%, to $86.4 million at March 31, 2012 from $88.5 million at December 31, 2011. This decrease in deposits was attributable to a $2.4 million, or 3.3%, decrease in certificates of deposit, a $731,000, or 10.5%, decrease in statement savings accounts, offset by a $993,000, or 25.3%, increase in eSavings accounts and a $3,000, or 0.10%, decrease in passbook savings accounts. Management allowed certificates of deposit to decline during the quarter as part of its strategy to use built-up excess liquidity to fund loan growth rather than grow high-cost deposits.
Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased $454,000 to $16.2 million at March 31, 2012 from $15.7 million at December 31, 2011. Contributing to the increase was net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $176,000, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $266,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $30,000, and common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan of $17,000. These increases were offset by dividends paid of $35,000.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
General. Net income amounted to $176,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, an increase of $19,000, or 12.1%, compared to net income of $157,000 for three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase in net income on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily the result of the increases in net interest income of $93,000 and non-interest income of $120,000, which were offset by increases in the provision for loan losses of $44,000, non-interest expense of $144,000, and the provision for income taxes of $6,000.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $93,000, or 10.4%, to $984,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from $891,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase was driven by a $78,000, or 5.7%, increase in interest income and a $15,000, or 3.2%, decrease in interest expense.
Interest Income. Interest income increased $78,000, or 5.7%, to $1.44 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from $1.36 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase in interest income was primarily due to a $4.4 million increase in average loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale, which had the effect of increasing interest income $74,000. Contributing an additional $28,000 to interest income was a combination of a thirty-six basis point increase in the yield on short-term investments and investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale, from 1.24% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to 1.60% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and an increase in average short short-term investments and investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale from $18.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $21.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Offsetting these increases was a $1.4 million decrease in average mortgage-backed securities held to maturity which had the effect of decreasing interest income $17,000, and a four basis point decline in the yield on loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale which had the effect of decreasing interest income $7,000. The increase in average loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale and short-term investments and investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily funded by the increase in average interest-bearing deposits while the decease in average mortgage-backed securities held to maturity was due to principal payments on these securities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $15,000, or 3.2%, to $451,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $466,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 17 basis point decline in the overall cost of average interest-bearing liabilities from 2.15% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to 1.98% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 which had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $24,000. This decrease in interest expense due to rate was offset by an $4.3 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $9,000. The decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from March 2011 to March 2012. The increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily driven by the growth in certificates of deposit and eSavings accounts, offset by a decrease in FHLB advances.
Average Balances, Net Interest Income, and Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin. All average balances are based on daily balances.
| | | Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Average | | | | | | Average Yield/ | | | Average | | | | | | Average Yield/ | |
| Interest-earning assets: | | (Dollars in thousands) | |
| Short-term investments and investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale | | $ | 21,792 | | | $ | 87 | | | | 1.60 | | | $ | 18,763 | | | $ | 58 | | | | 1.24 | |
| Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity | | | 3,787 | | | | 45 | | | | 4.75 | | | | 5,210 | | | | 63 | | | | 4.84 | |
| Loans receivable, net (1) (2) | | | 78,574 | | | | 1,303 | | | | 6.63 | | | | 74,152 | | | | 1,236 | | | | 6.67 | |
| Total interest-earning assets | | | 104,153 | | | | 1,435 | | | | 5.51 | % | | | 98,125 | | | | 1,357 | | | | 5.53 | % |
| Non-interest-earning assets | | | 3,796 | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,024 | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | | $ | 107,949 | | | | | | | | | | | | 103,149 | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Passbook accounts | | $ | 2,948 | | | | 2 | | | | 0.27 | % | | $ | 3,091 | | | | 3 | | | | 0.39 | % |
| Statement savings accounts | | | 6,674 | | | | 7 | | | | 0.42 | | | | 6,911 | | | | 13 | | | | 0.75 | |
| eSavings accounts | | | 4,258 | | | | 10 | | | | 0.94 | | | | 2,432 | | | | 6 | | | | 0.99 | |
| Certificate of deposit accounts | | | 73,449 | | | | 392 | | | | 2.13 | | | | 68,377 | | | | 384 | | | | 2.25 | |
| Total deposits | | | 87,329 | | | | 411 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 80,811 | | | | 406 | | | | 2.01 | |
| FHLB advances | | | 3,800 | | | | 40 | | | | 4.21 | | | | 5,600 | | | | 54 | | | | 3.86 | |
| Other borrowings | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 419 | | | | 6 | | | | 5.73 | |
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | | | 91,129 | | | | 451 | | | | 1.98 | % | | | 86,830 | | | | 466 | | | | 2.15 | % |
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | | | 1,031 | | | | | | | | | | | | 980 | | | | | | | | | |
| Total liabilities | | | 92,160 | | | | | | | | | | | | 87,810 | | | | | | | | | |
| Stockholders’ Equity | | | 15,789 | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,339 | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 107,949 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 103,149 | | | | | | | | | |
| Net interest-earning assets | | $ | 11,489 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 11,295 | | | | | | | | | |
Net interest income; average interest rate spread | | | | | | $ | 984 | | | | 3.53 | % | | | | | | $ | 891 | | | | 3.38 | % |
| Net interest margin (3) | | | | | | | | | | | 3.78 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 3.63 | % |
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | 114.29 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 113.01 | % |
_______________________
| (1) | Includes loans held for sale. |
| (2) | Includes non-accrual loans during the respective periods. Calculated net of deferred fees and discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses. |
| (3) | Equals net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. |
Provision for Loan Losses. The Company increased its provision for loan losses by $44,000 from $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $71,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, based on an evaluation of the allowance relative to such factors as volume of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit risk, prevailing economic conditions, prior loan loss experience and amount of non-performing loans at March 31, 2012.
Non-performing loans amounted to $3.4 million, or 4.32% of net loans receivable at March 31, 2012, consisting of thirty-six loans, twenty-two of which are on non-accrual status and fourteen of which are 90 days or more past due and accruing interest. Comparably, non-performing loans amounted to $3.3 million, or 4.42% of net loans receivable at December 31, 2011, consisting of thirty-six loans, twenty of which were on non-accrual status and sixteen of which were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest. The non-performing loans at March 31, 2012 include thirteen one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loans, nine home equity loans, seven commercial real estate loans, five one-to-four family owner-occupied residential loans, one multi-family residential loan, and one consumer non-real estate loan, and all are generally well-collateralized or adequately reserved for. At this time, management does not anticipate any significant losses on these loans. During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, three loans were placed on non-accrual status resulting in the reversal of approximately $14,000 of previously accrued interest income and one loan that was on non-accrual was returned to accrual status. Included in non-performing loans are seven loans identified as troubled debt restructurings which totaled $443,000 at March 31, 2012. The Company had one additional troubled debt restructuring not included in non-performing loans at March 31, 2012 in the amount of $182,000 that was 60-89 days past due. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable was 1.11% at March 31, 2012 and 1.06% at December 31, 2011.
Other real estate owned (OREO) amounted to $25,000 at March 31, 2012, consisting of one property, a residential building lot. This compares to three properties totaling $185,000 at December 31, 2011. During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Company sold two OREO properties and realized an aggregate loss of $6,000. Non-performing assets amounted to $3.4 million, or 3.17% of total assets at March 31, 2012 compared to $3.5 million, or 3.22% of total assets at December 31, 2011.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $120,000, or 151.9%, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 over the comparable period in 2011 was primarily attributable to a $105,000 increase in fee income generated by Quaint Oak Bank’s mortgage banking and title abstract subsidiaries and a $32,000 gain on the sale of an SBA loan, offset by an aggregate loss of $6,000 realized on the sale of two other real estate owned properties.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $144,000, or 21.2%, from $679,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $823,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Salaries and employee benefits expense accounted for $108,000 of the change as this expense increased 28.1%, from $385,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $493,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due primarily to increased staff as the Company expanded its mortgage banking and lending operations and implemented employee health care benefits. Also contributing to the period over period increase was a $24,000, or 47.1%, increase in occupancy and equipment expense, a $22,000, or 47.8%, increase in other expense, a $3,000, or 27.3%, increase in advertising expense and a $2,000, or 2.6%, increase in professional fees. Offsetting these increases was a $7,000, or 17.9%, decrease in FDIC deposit insurance expense, a $5,000, or 38.5%, decrease in other real estate owned expense, and a $3,000, or 5.2%, decrease in directors’ fees and expenses.
Provision for Income Tax. The provision for income tax increased $6,000, or 5.6%, from $107,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 to $113,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due primarily to the increase in pre-tax income as our effective tax rate remained relatively consistent at 39.1% for the 2012 period compared to 40.5% for the comparable period in 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and to a lesser extent, loan sales and other funds provided from operations. While scheduled principal and interest payments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. The Company sets the interest rates on its deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits. In addition, the Company invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets that provide additional liquidity. At March 31, 2012 the Company's cash and cash equivalents amounted to $3.2 million. At such date, the Company also had $3.3 million invested in interest-earning time deposits maturing in one year or less.
The Company uses its liquidity to fund existing and future loan commitments, to fund deposit outflows, to invest in other interest-earning assets and to meet operating expenses. At March 31, 2012, Quaint Oak Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $2.9 million and commitments under unused lines of credit of $5.1 million.
At March 31, 2012, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $33.7 million. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although it is dependent on our deposit pricing strategy at this time and there can be no assurance that this will be the case.
In addition to cash flow from loan payments and prepayments and deposits, the Company has significant borrowing capacity available to fund liquidity needs. If the Company requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which provide an additional source of funds. As of March 31, 2012, we had $3.8 million of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and had $42.0 million in borrowing capacity. We are reviewing our continued utilization of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a source of funding based on the decision in December 2008 by the Federal Home Loan Bank to suspend the dividend on, and restrict the repurchase of, Federal Home Loan Bank stock. The amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock that a member institution is required to hold is directly proportional to the volume of advances taken by that institution. Should we decide to utilize sources of funding other than advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, we believe that additional funding is available in the form of advances or repurchase agreements through various other sources. Quaint Oak Bank currently has two additional line of credit commitments with two different banks totaling $1.5 million. There were no borrowings under these lines of credit at March 31, 2012.
Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $16.2 million at March 31, 2012, an increase of $454,000 from December 31, 2011. Contributing to the increase was net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 of $176,000, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $266,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $30,000, and common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan of $17,000. These increases were offset by dividends paid of $35,000. For further discussion of the stock compensation plans, see Note 7 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
Quaint Oak Bank is required to maintain regulatory capital sufficient to meet tier 1 leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 4.00%, 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively. At March 31, 2012, Quaint Oak Bank exceeded each of its capital requirements with ratios of 13.64%, 21.57% and 22.84%, respectively. As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is not currently subject to any regulatory capital requirements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers' requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. Our exposure to credit loss from non-performance by the other party to the above-mentioned financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. In general, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off–balance sheet credit risk.
Commitments. At March 31, 2012, we had unfunded commitments under lines of credit of $5.1 million and $2.9 million of commitments to originate loans. We had no commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit or undisbursed construction loans.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance than does the effect of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation to a larger extent than interest rates.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2012. Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations are operating in an effective manner.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, which involve amounts in the aggregate believed by management to be immaterial to the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company’s repurchases of its common stock made during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 are set forth in the table below:
| | Total Number of Shares | | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) | |
| January 1, 2012 – January 31, 2012 | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | | 63,225 | |
| February 1, 2012 – February 29, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 63,225 | |
| March 1, 2012 – March 31, 2012 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 63,225 | |
Total | | | - | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | | 63,225 | |
Notes to this table:
| (1) | On September 10, 2010, the Company announced by press release its third repurchase program to repurchase up to an additional 69,431 shares, or approximately 6.2% of the Company's then current outstanding shares of common stock. The Company commenced this third stock repurchase program upon the completion of its prior repurchase program on December 3, 2010. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY PROCEDURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
| | |
| 31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(d) and 15d-14(d) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.* |
| 31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(d) and 15d-14(d) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.* |
| 32.0 | | Section 1350 Certification.* |
| | |
| | |
| The following Exhibits are being furnished as part of this report: |
|
No. | | | 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document.** | | | 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.** | | | 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.** | | | 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.** | | | 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.** | | | 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document.** | |
| * | *
**
| Previously filed.
The interactive data files are being furnished on Exhibit 101 hereto and, in accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Date: | August 24, 2011May 14, 2012 | By: | /s/ /s/Robert T. Strong | | | | | | Robert T. Strong | | | | | | President and Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | | | | | | Date: | August 24, 2011 | By: | /s/ | By: | /s/John J. Augustine | | | Date: | May 14, 2012 | | John J. Augustine | | | | | John J. Augustine
Chief Financial Officer |
4
|