Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§230.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated file," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

 

 

 

The Company entered the pharmaceutical testing laboratory market with their acquisitions of MA & Associates, LLC which will operate pharmaceutical testing laboratories in Nevada, and Harris Lee Holdings, LLC which will operate pharmaceutical testing laboratories within other states, or license testing protocols as independently owned laboratories.  These pharmaceutical testing laboratories focus on providing quality control services to the medical cannabis industry.  The mission is to protect the public health by providing infrastructure and analytical services to legally-authorized cannabis producers and distributors as well as to regulators.  States that have legalized cannabis are developing cannabis health and safety criteria that we will fulfill through their testing laboratories.  Harris Lee Holdings, LLC, due to Colorado residency requirements, entered into an advisory agreement with Harris Lee Colorado, LLC, a related party. Harris Lee Holdings, LLC had sub-licensed the testing protocols to Harris Lee Colorado, LLC in exchange for management fees for each test conducted.  The Colorado MED approved the transfer of management of an existing laboratory, operating as Steep Hill Colorado, to Harris Lee Colorado, LLC (a related party) and Harris Lee Holdings, LLC has derived management fees from Harris Lee Colorado, LLC in the year ending December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2017.2016.  However, because of the failure to transfer the MED license to Harris Lee Colorado, LLC, the Denver laboratory was closed by the end 2016.  The Company does not expect to re-commence operations in Colorado in the near future. Lastly, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, CK Distribution LLC, provides the marketing and sales agent for the distribution of non-controlled hemp products throughout the USA. Non-controlled hemp products are the items utilized by the industry that support grow facilities, infusion companies and dispensaries. On January 4, 2017 the Company's 100% wholly owned subsidiary MA & Associates received its final approval and Marijuana Testing License from the City of Las Vegas, NV and can now commence operations.operations in Las Vegas.

Further, the business consists of pazoo.com, an online, content driven, ad supported health and wellness web site for people and their pets. Additionally, this site has e-commerce functionality which allows pazoo.com to be an online retailer of nutritional foods/supplements, wellness goods, and fitness apparel. Pazoo, Inc. does not have any brick and mortar establishments.

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the  Pazoo, Inc. ("Pazoo" or the "Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiaries MA & Associates, LLC, Harris Lee Holdings, LLC and CK Distributions, LLC. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

In April 2017, the Company effected a 1-for-250 reverse stock split of the outstanding common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split") whereby every two hundred fifty (250) shares of outstanding common stock decreased to one (1) share of common stock. Similarly, the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 ("Common Stock") into which each outstanding Preferred stock is to be exercisable decreased on a 1-for-250 basis and the exercise price of each outstanding preferred stock to purchase common stock increased proportionately resulting in no effect from the reverse stock split. The impact of this reverse stock split has been retroactively applied to the consolidated financial statements and the related notes.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the threesix month period ended March 31,June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed on April 21, 2017.

 

In accordance with GAAP the preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

 

On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, accrued expenses, financing operations, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Company's financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in the notes to the financial statements. 

 

BasicThe following table sets forth the computation of basic net lossincome per share and diluted net income per share.

Common share equivalents of approximately 1,538,013,900 consisting of 825,462,500 of common share is computed by dividing net loss applicableequivalents due to common stockholders by the weighted average numberassumed conversion of debt and 712,551,400 of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share reflects, in additionequivalents due to the weighted average numberassumed conversion of common shares, the potential dilution if shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into sharesincluded in the computation of common stock and a corresponding accrued 5% dividend, unlessdiluted earnings per share for the effects of such exercises and conversions would have been anti-dilutive.three months ended June 30, 2017.

 

The Company's financial instruments consist principally of cash, derivatives, convertible debt, and accounts payable. The Company believes that the recorded values of all of its other financial instruments approximate their fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations. The fair value of our long-term debt is determined by using estimated market prices. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based on whether or not the inputs are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are observable. The categorization of financial instruments within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is prioritized into three levels (with Level 3 being the lowest) defined as follows:

 

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company's financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new guidance related to how an entity should recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. The guidance specifies that an entity who is a lessee under lease agreements should recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for those leases classified as operating leases under previous FASB guidance. Accounting for leases by lessors is largely unchanged under the new guidance. The guidance is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2019. Early adoption is permitted.  In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which delayed the effective date of the new standard from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018. The FASB also agreed to allow entities to choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. This ASU permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect to the financial statements.

 

 

During the threesix months ended MarchJune 2016 and 2017, the Company incurred net losses of $4,342,042$8,324,765 and $1,933,868,$1,149,653, respectively. In addition, as of March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficit of $9,477,866.$8,501,714 as well as twelve (12) notes with past due principal balances totaling $1,031,131 and accrued default interest and associated penalties related to these instruments. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow and raise additional capital to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately attain profitability. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash flow or raise additional capital, it could be forced to cease operations.  The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow and raise additional capital to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately attain profitability. The Company does not have sufficient capital for the next 12 months from the issuance of these financial statements.

 

The Company's liquidity is highly dependent on its ability to obtain additional capital in the near future. The Company's failure to raise new capital would impair its ability to both continue its current operations and could result in its failure to continue to operate as a going concern. Substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern may also create negative reactions to the price of the Company's common stock, and the Company may not be able to obtain additional financing in the future. The Company is currently exploring potential transactions, specifically through the filing of its Form 14C in January 2017 which will set up the characteristics of the Series D Preferred stock in anticipation of a large financial investment. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to the Company and on a timely basis, the Company will be required to downsize or wind down its operations through liquidation, bankruptcy, or a sale of its assets. In addition, to the extent additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, such securities may be sold at a discount from the market price of the Company's common stock. The issuance of these securities could also result in significant dilution to some or all of the Company's stockholders, depending on the terms of the transaction. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to consummate additional capital raises.

 

Fixed assets consists of the following:

 

 

Costs of assets acquired under capital leases were approximately $615,000 as of March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  The capital lease represents a total of three leases for testing equipment. The leases hold an interest rate of 0% and monthly payments are approximately $17,000 per month. The depreciation for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and March 31,June 30, 2016 was $46,504$93,009 and $46,504,$25,272, respectively. As of March 31,June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accumulated depreciation related to assets under capital lease was approximately $190,151$220,903 and $159,401, respectively. All leased equipment is collateral under the respective lease agreements. As of March 31,June 30, 2017, the Company was currently in default of these lease agreements, as scheduled payments were not made. Commencing in 2017, the Company began making payments toward the capital leases again.

The Company entered into a line of credit with Wells Fargo in December 2015 in the amount of $25,000.  The credit line bears an interest rate of 9.75% annually, compounded daily, and there is no term on the account. There are no financial covenants and the guarantor on the account is Steve Basloe. The line of credit has been used for general operating expenses.

The Company entered into a line of credit with Wells Fargo in May 2016 in the amount of $5,000. The credit line bears an interest rate of 24.24% for the first year and then 9.75% annually, compounded daily, and there is no term on the account. There are no financial covenants and the guarantor on the account is David Cunic, the Company's CEO. The credit has been used for general operating expenses.

The combined lines of credit at December 31, 2016 totaled $21,039 compared to $19,172$16,070 at March 31,June 30, 2017.

 

The Company evaluates all of it financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For option-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.

 

Under ASC-815 the conversion options embedded in the notes payable described in Note 6 require liability classification because they do not contain an explicit limit to the number of shares that could be issued upon settlement.

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the derivative liabilities during threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017:

 

The Company uses the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model to value its convertible debt and warrant derivative liabilities based upon the following assumptions during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

During threethe six months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016, the aggregate gain/(loss) on derivative liability was ($904,409)$374,094 and ($2,406,761)4,438,979), respectively, consisting of initial derivative expense that equals the excess of the derivative liability over principal received and the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities.

 

The following table summarizes the changes in the convertible notes in the year ended December 31, 2016 and the threesix months ending March 31,June 30, 2017:

 

 

In January 2017, the company entered into a convertible note agreement for an aggregate total of $206,379. The interest rate is 12% and the conversion terms are 50% of the average of the lowest 3 trading prices during the 20 trading days prior to conversion. The maturity date is December 2017. The proceeds from the note were used to pay off previous notes from the lender. In addition, the Company paid back $44,575the note as of March 31,June 30, 2017.

 

In February 2017, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement for a total of $63,800. The interest rate is 10% and the conversion terms are the lower of (a) $0.009 or (b) 45% of the lowest trading price during the 30 trading days prior to conversion. The maturity date is February 2018.

 

The Company evaluated all convertible notes describe above under ASC 815 and determined that certain conversion features qualify as derivative liabilities (see Note 5).

During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 the Company incurred approximately $286,000$715,867 of a gain in debt extinguishment primarily as a result of various notes converting to equity, with the corresponding derivative liability value at the date of conversion being written off to debt extinguishment as a gain, offset by the unamortized discount on the convertible debt at the time of conversion.

In addition to the funds received, noteholders converted $24,927$63,071 during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 into common stock exclusive of accrued interest. At March 31,June 30, 2017, a total of 8twelve notes with a principleprincipal balance of $798,396$1,031,131 were past due. The Company has adequately accrued all default interest and associated penalties related to these instruments. Additionally, cross default clauses exist within certain other instruments containing terms which would make the notes immediately due and payable, however no cross default clauses have been triggered as of yet.

 

 

The Company received $364,500$687,000 of new cash additions in the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017.  Cash payments consisted of $28,563.$51,175. Interest added to the note payables in the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 totaled $7,516.$11,253. The interest ratesrate on the loans ranged fromare 8% to 12%.  These additions coincide as an advance on the 14C filing for the Preferred Series D Shares.

In 2017, the Company filed a Form 14-C in order to effectuate a 1-for-250 reverse stock split of the outstanding common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split") whereby every two hundred and fifty (250) shares of outstanding common stock decreases to one (1) share of common stock. The current Reverse Stock Split went effective on April 26, 2017. All shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for all periods presented.

 

In January 2017, the Company filed a Form 14-C Information Statement advising all shareholders of the Company that the Board of Directors, as ratified by the majority of the votes of equity holders in late April 2017, approved of a reverse stock split (at a ratio of 250:1) and setting forth the proposed terms and characteristics of the Series D Preferred Stock.  The Series D Preferred Stock will carry a 5% annual dividend, will have no voting rights prior to conversion, and will convert into common stock at a ratio which will be determined by the amount of debt to be retired, and new money to be invested, and the then outstanding common stock of the Company on a fully diluted basis (See, the filed Form 14C for more details)

 

The purpose of reconstituting the characteristics of the Series D Preferred Stock is to have the ability to consummate the contemplated sale of the Company's Series D Preferred Stock as set forth in the Form 14C. If, and when, the agreement has been finalized for the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock, the characteristics of the Series D Preferred Stock will be set forth in a Certificate of Designations to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.  If the characteristics are substantively different than as previously approved by the Board of Directors, and ratified by the majority of the votes of equity holders, new approval will be sought. The proposed terms of the agreement are to be 80% of the common stock on a fully diluted basis.

 

The conversion rates for all of the Preferred Series of Stock are not affected by the reverse stock split, effected in April 2017.

 

 

During 2017, 75 shares of Series A Preferred stock were issued for dividends.

 

 

In 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 387,500 Series B Preferred Stock, valued at approximately $56,000, to Board Members as compensation in connection with MA and Associates, LLC receiving its license to operate.

 

 

In 2017, there have been no issuances or salesa total of 11,000 Series C Preferred Stock.stock was converted into 1,100,000 of common stock by Series C Preferred shareholders.

 

 

In 2017, there have been no issuances or sales of Series D Preferred Stock or Series E Preferred Stock as the Certificate of Designation has not been filed as it depends on the 14C Filing offering the Preferred D Series Stock.

 

In July 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an affiliate of Mr. Basloe, a board member of the Company. The agreement provides for consulting on marketing-related services for the Company. Amounts incurred under this agreement for the threesix months ended March 31June 30, 2017 and 2016, totaled $9,200$20,500 and $6,500, respectively.

In 2016, the Company managed Harris Lee Colorado, LLC, an existing lab in Denver, Colorado, after receiving approval from the Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division in February of 2016. Harris Lee Holdings, LLC has sub-licensed the testing protocols to Harris Lee Colorado, LLC in exchange for a management fee for each test conducted. The Colorado MED has recently approved the transfer of management of an existing laboratory, to Harris Lee Colorado, LLC (a related party) and Harris Lee Holdings, LLC has begun to derive management fees from Harris Lee Colorado, LLC.  The revenue derived from these management fees for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 and 2016 are $0 and $30,515.$18,596. The laboratory closed during 2016 and the Company does not have plans to re-open in the near future.

 

In August 2016, Pazoo, Inc. entered into a loan agreement with David Cunic, Company CEO, and totaling $5,000.  The note has an interest rate of 0.70% and the maturity date is August 2018. As of MarchJune 2017, $0 remains outstanding.

In September 2016, Pazoo, Inc. entered into a loan agreement with Steve Basloe, Company President, and totaling $2,500.  The note has an interest rate of 0.70% and the maturity date is September 2018. As of MarchJune 2017, $2,500 remains outstanding.

On March 10, 2015, Harris Lee signed a 9-year licensing agreement with Steep Hill Labs, LLC, with options to renew for an additional 9 years. The purpose of the agreement is to take the Steep Hill licensing to additional states to test medical marijuana above and beyond the State of Nevada, namely Oregon and Colorado. Under the license agreement for the first two states (Oregon and Colorado), if certain gross revenue thresholds are met, the Company is obligated to pay an additional $250,000. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay certain royalties over the life of the license agreement to Steep Hill Labs, Inc, based on the greater of the number of tests ($5 dollars a test) or an escalating royalty rate (7% to 15%) of the initial purchase price. The Company has the option to enter into additional states with similar commitments and royalties.  In June 2016, the Company, due to the uncertainties surrounding the license agreement with Steep Hill, impaired 100% of the value of the Steep Hill Labs licenses due to the purported unsubstantiated termination of the license agreements in June 2016 between Steep Hill Labs and MA & Associates, LLC and Harris Lee, LLC respectively.

 

 

The Company's subsidiary MA and Associates, LLC rents space in Nevada with a 60 month term ending in May of 2019, with monthly rent expense of $2,242.

The Company rents office space in New Jersey with a term ending on May of 2018 and monthly payments of approximately $700.

As of March 31,June 30, 2017 the Company was still obligated to pay the remaining portion under the original 2014 40% investment agreement with MA and Associates, LLC, consisting of $678,000 of cash and 50,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock (valued at $35,000 as of March 31,June 30, 2017), totaling $713,581 and included in contingent consideration liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and will be issued in the future after the testing laboratory is operational.

On or about April 21, 2017, Eri Eveland filed a Complaint in District Court of Denver County Colorado against Harris Lee Colorado, LLC, Harris Lee Holdings, LLC and Pazoo Inc.  Ms. Eveland is a former employee of Harris Lee Colorado, LLC and is claiming less than $15,000 in unpaid salary/wages.  Inasmuch as Ms. Eveland was not an employee of Harris Lee Holdings, LLC nor Pazoo, Inc., her claims against the Company are derivative in nature and based on theories of corporate alter ego.  The Company disputes any liability.  As of the date of this report, neither Harris Lee Holdings, LLC nor Pazoo, Inc. have been served with the Complaint.  The Company feels it has many valid defenses to this action and, once served, will seek to have the Complaint summarily dismissed as to the Company.

 

The company issued an aggregate of 8,934,30349,465,178 common shares for conversion of debt and for the settlement of other liabilities valued at a total of $49,850.$38,857.

 

 

 

 

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Any statements in this Quarterly Report that are not statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Without limiting the foregoing, the words "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including under "Risk Factors."10-Q. You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our unaudited financial statements for the periods specified and the related notes included herein. Further reference should be made to our Registration Statement on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains terminology referring to Pazoo, Inc., such as "us," "our," and "the Company."

 

 

We were incorporated as a C-Corporation in the State of Nevada as IUCSS, Inc. on November 16, 2010 and we established a fiscal year end of December 31.  On May 9, 2011, we changed our name to Pazoo, Inc. to take advantage of unique branding and website opportunities. We are a start-up health and wellness social community that has developed its website (www.pazoo.com) to provide information, services, and online products for improvement of everyday living.  Our mission is to be 1) a leading social community offering best-in-class health and wellness products for both people and pets; 2) an important resource for consumers and professionals with diverse information about health and wellness and 3) specifically as it relates to medical marijuana and the testing of medical marijuana to ensure quality and safety for the consumer.

Our principal executive offices are located at 34 DeForest Ave, Unit 9, East Hanover NJ 07936. Our telephone number is (855) PAZOO-US. Our internet address is www.pazoo.com.

We are a health and wellness company. Presently, our only sources of revenue are pazoo.com and management fees derived from Harris Lee Holdings, LLC. Pazoo.com is an online, content driven, advertising supported health and wellness web site for people and their pets. This site has e-commerce functionality which allows pazoo.com to be an online retailer of nutritional foods/supplements, wellness goods, and fitness apparel. The Company has also moved into the cannabis industry where it seeks to provide, through its wholly owned subsidiaries (MA & Associates, LLC and previously Harris Lee Holdings, LLC), quality control services to the medical and recreational cannabis industry.  The Company's primary mission is to protect the public health by providing infrastructure and analytical services to legally authorized distributors and producers of cannabis and to regulators tracking their operations.  The Company will provide the medical cannabis industry guidelines on how the regulation and inspection by public health authorities is to be implemented.  It is anticipated that this segment of the company will be its primary revenue source in the future. The cannabis industry is heavily regulated on the Federal, State and Local levels and the Company is subject to changing regulation and enforcement. As of December 31, 2016, the cannabis testing laboratory in Denver, Colorado is closed and the Company does not have any plans to re-open the facility in the near future.

We currently have two lines of business relating to and revolving around the health and wellness arena; at this time no significant revenue has been derived from any of these sources.

 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, accrued expenses, financing operations, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

 

Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses consisted primarily of selling, general and administrative expenses, professional fees and website set up.  Total operating expenses decreased to $718,441$1,212,331 for the threesix month period ended March 31,June 30, 2017 from $851,096$3,940,261 for the threesix month period ended March 31, 2016.  The components of operating expenses are detailed below.June 30, 2016 and decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses. 

 

Selling, General and Administrative expenses decreased to $537,095$865,604 from $701,686, in$2,128,170, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 versuscompared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 which was mainly comprised of administrative fees, stock compensation, and marketing & advertising.  The SG&A decrease was due primarily to a lack of marketing and advertising as compared to 2016 as the focus of the company has shifted to the testing laboratory in Nevada. The decrease in stock compensation is mostly due to the one million settlement of shares and warrants in June 30, 2016.

 

Professional fees increased to $180,004$343,159 from $144,443 in$263,748 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 versuscompared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in professional fees was attributed to an increase in investor relations and financial consultants.consultants as well as legal fees.

 

Net Income (Loss).  Our net loss decreased to $1,933,868$1,149,653 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 compared to $4,342,042$8,324,765 for the same period in 2016. The decrease is primarily attributable to gain (loss) on debt extinguishment from the various debt conversions in each period.period and decrease in operating loss. The decrease in interest expense was mostly due to amortization of debt discounts and derivative liability from initial loss on debt discount. Because less notes were acquired in the threesix months ended March 31, 2016June 30, 2017 compared to the threesix months ended March 31, 2017,June 30, 2016, both interest expense and derivative liability decreased, as well as some of the other debt discounts fully amortized.

 

 

As of March 31,June 30, 2017 and MarchDecember 31, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $36,843$103,636 and $30,625.$88,909.

  

The Company has no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any officer, director or shareholder as to any future financing, either equity or debt. In view of general economic conditions, there can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to us, that any affiliate will provide additional investments in the Company or that adequate funds for our operations will otherwise be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us.

   

We had negative working capital of $9,477,866$8,501,714 as of March 31,June 30, 2017 comparedas well as twelve notes with past due principal balances totaling $1,031,131 and accrued default interest and associated penalties related to $7,599,588 at December 31, 2016.these instruments.

  

We used $485,865$754,752 in operating activities for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 compared to $413,264$653,097 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2016, which included a net loss of $1,933,868$1,149,653 and $4,342,042,$8,324,765 respectively.

 

We had $433,799$768,881 provided by financing activities in the threesix month period ended March 31,June 30, 2017 compared to $427,070$640,042 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2016, due primarily to proceeds from loans payable.payable and convertible debt.

 

The consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles that contemplate our continuance as a going concern. The Company has had minimal revenues and has generated losses from operation. As set forth in Note 2 of these financial statements, the continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable, if ever. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow and raise additional capital to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately attain profitability.  If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash flow or raise additional capital, it could be forced to cease operations.  The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow and raise additional capital to meet our obligations on a timely basis and ultimately attain profitability. The Company does not have sufficient capital for the next 12 months from the issuance of these financial statements.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.  We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

As a "smaller reporting company", as defined by Item 10(f) of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information required by Item 3.

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of and with our executive officers, David M. Cunic in his role as Chief Executive Officer and Ben Hoehn in his role as Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Based upon that evaluation, the officers concluded that because of the limited size and resources of our organization our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of March 31,June 30, 2017.

 

We have not made any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

In April 2013, the Company filed a complaint against Edataworx, Inc. for return of monies and stock under an agreement dated August 2012. On November 4, 2013, the Company filed an amended complaint now seeking total damages of $105,000 and a return, for cancellation, of the 20,000 shares of company's common stock issued to Edataworx Inc.  On November 21, 2013 Edataworx, Inc. filed an Answer to the Amended Complaint denying the allegations and asserted a Counter-Claim against the Company in the amount of $25,000. Edataworx, Inc. also filed a Third-Party Complaint against Integrated Capital Partners, Inc. (an investor of the Company) for the same $25,000. On February 27, 2015, the parties agreed to settle all claims whereby Edataworx, Inc. will pay to the Company a total of $35,000 in three installments.  Additionally, Edataworx, Inc. will be allowed to retain a minimum of 15,000 shares of the Company's common stock previously issued with the possibility to retain all 20,000 shares if Edataworx Inc. elects to sell the 15,000 shares agreed upon, and the aggregate sales price is less than $2.00 per share. Edataworx, Inc. failed to make any required payments.  On February 25, 2016 new action to enforce the Settlement Agreement, including a claim for attorney's fees as provided for in the Settlement Agreement, was filed.  Edataworx failed to respond to the Complaint in the action to enforce the Settlement Agreement.  On September 16, 2016 a Judgment was entered in favor of the Company in the Amount of $35,012.  The Company is currently seeking to enforce the Judgment.

On or about April 21, 2017, Eri Eveland filed a Complaint in District Court of Denver County Colorado against Harris Lee Colorado, LLC, Harris Lee Holdings, LLC and Pazoo Inc.  Ms. Eveland is a former employee of Harris Lee Colorado, LLC and is claiming less than $15,000 in unpaid salary/wages.  Inasmuch as Ms. Eveland was not an employee of Harris Lee Holdings, LLC nor Pazoo, Inc., her claims against the Company are derivative in nature and based on theories of corporate alter ego.  The Company disputes any liability.  As of the date of this report, neither Harris Lee Holdings, LLC nor Pazoo, Inc. have been served with the Complaint.  The Company feels it has many valid defenses to this action and, once served, will seek to have the Complaint summarily dismissed as to the Company.

As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10(f) of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this item. 

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.