☒

As of ~~August 20, 2021,~~May 10, 2022, there were ~~12,908,594~~21,880,169 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.

Palisade Bio, Inc.

Table of Contents


		Page
PART I -	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	27
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	27

PART II -	OTHER INFORMATION	29

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	29
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	29
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	56
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	56
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	56
Item 5.	Other Information	56
Item 6.	Exhibits	56

SIGNATURES		59

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Palisade Bio, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	March 31,			December 31,
	2022			2021
	(Unaudited)

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,644		$	10,495
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,614			1,879
Total current assets		8,258			12,374
Restricted cash		26			26
Right-of-use asset		64			109
Property and equipment, net		2			3
Total assets	$	8,350		$	12,512

LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,147		$	1,323
Accrued liabilities		580			463
Accrued compensation and benefits		72			511
Current portion of lease liability		65			112
Current portion of debt		0			87
Total current liabilities		1,864			2,496
Warrant liability		1,694			2,651
Total liabilities		3,558			5,147
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders' equity:
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 7,000,000 shares authorized, $0.01 par value; 200,000 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021		2			2
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively; 18,233,479 and 14,239,177 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021		183			143
Additional paid-in capital		103,454			101,862
Accumulated deficit		(98,847	)		(94,642	)
Total stockholders' equity		4,792			7,365
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	8,350		$	12,512

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Palisade Bio, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021
Operating expenses:
Research and development	$	959		$	692
General and administrative		2,929			1,262
Total operating expenses		3,888			1,954
Loss from operations		(3,888	)		(1,954	)
Other income (expense):
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan		0			279
Loss on issuance of secured debt		0			(686	)
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liability		793			42
Interest expense		(1	)		(1,711	)
Other income		1			0
Loss on issuance of warrants		(1,110	)		0
Total other expense		(317	)		(2,076	)
Net loss	$	(4,205	)	$	(4,030	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.26	)	$	(1.45	)
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per common share		16,223,656			2,774,502

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Palisade Bio, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(in thousands, except share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
	Series C Convertible Preferred Stock				Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance, December 31, 2021		—	$	—		200,000	$	2		14,239,177	$	143	$	101,862	$	(94,642	)	$	7,365
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		(4,205	)		(4,205	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—		—		—		—		358		—			358
Issuance of common stock upon warrant exercises		—		—		—		—		3,994,302		40		1,234					1,274
Balance, March 31, 2022		—	$	—		200,000	$	2		18,233,479	$	183	$	103,454	$	(98,847	)	$	4,792


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
	Series C Convertible Preferred Stock				Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance, December 31, 2020		11,674,131	$	9,503		—	$	—		2,774,502	$	28	$	51,396	$	(68,026	)	$	(16,602	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		(4,030	)		(4,030	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		—		—		—		—		569		—			569
Balance, March 31, 2021		11,674,131	$	9,503		—	$	—		2,774,502	$	28	$	51,965	$	(72,056	)	$	(20,063	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Palisade Bio, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021

Net loss	$	(4,205	)	$	(4,030	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1			1
Noncash lease expense		45			39
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan		0			(279	)
Accretion of debt discount and non-cash interest expense		0			1,590
Loss on issuance of secured debt		0			686
Loss on issuance of warrants		1,110			0
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities		(793	)		(42	)
Stock-based compensation		358			569
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade and other receivables		0			59
Prepaid and other assets		265			21
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(59	)		183
Accrued compensation		(439	)		(8	)
Operating lease liabilities		(47	)		(39	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(3,764	)		(1,250	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on debt		(87	)		(11	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt		0			1,250
Payment of debt issuance costs		0			(87	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(87	)		1,152
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(3,851	)		(98	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period		10,521			739
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period	$	6,670		$	641
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash to the balance sheets:
Cash and cash equivalents		6,644			615
Restricted cash		26			26
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	6,670		$	641
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows:
Interest paid	$	0		$	3
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock for the cashless exercise of warrants	$	1,274		$	0
Deferred equity issuance costs in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	82		$	41
Deferred transaction costs in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	0		$	2,337
Debt issuance costs included in accounts payable	$	0		$	16

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PALISADE BIO, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Organization, Business and Financial Condition

The Merger

On April 27, 2021, Leading Biosciences, Inc. (“LBS”) became a wholly owned subsidiary of Seneca Biopharma Inc. (“Seneca”) in accordance with the terms of the agreement and plan of merger and reorganization, dated as of December 16, 2020, (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among Seneca, Townsgate Acquisition Sub 1, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Seneca (“Merger Sub”), and LBS, pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into LBS, with LBS surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Seneca (the “Merger”). Concurrent with the closing of the Merger, LBS outstanding common stock, common stock warrants and options for the purchase of LBS common stock were exchanged for Seneca common stock, Seneca common stock warrants, and options for the purchase of Seneca common stock, at a ratio of 0.02719 shares of LBS common stock equivalents to one share of Seneca common stock equivalents (the “Exchange Ratio”). On April 27, 2021, in connection with the Merger, Seneca filed a certificate of amendment to its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to affect a 1-for-6 reverse stock split of its common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). The par value and the authorized shares of the common stock were not adjusted as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. The final Exchange Ratio incorporated the effect of this Reverse Stock Split, and all issued and outstanding common stock have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this Reverse Stock Split for all periods presented. All issued and outstanding shares of LBS common stock and shares of common stock ~~$0.01 par value, outstanding.~~

~~EXPLANATORY NOTE~~

~~This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”)~~underlying convertible preferred stock, options and warrants prior to the ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~effective date of the Merger have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the Exchange Ratio for all periods presented herein these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company,” “Palisade,” “Palisade Bio,” the “combined organization,” “we,” “our” or “us” in this report refer to Palisade Bio, Inc. ~~(the “Company”)~~and its subsidiaries after completion of the Merger. In addition, references to “Seneca” or “LBS” refer to these entities prior to the completion of the Merger.

Description of Business

The Company is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company advancing therapies that aim to aid patients suffering with acute and chronic gastrointestinal complications stemming from post-operative digestive enzyme damage. The Company's lead asset LB1148, is a protease inhibitor with the potential to both reduce abdominal adhesions and help restore bowel function following surgery. The Company believes that its investigational therapies have the potential to address the myriad health conditions and complications associated with the chronic disruption to the gastrointestinal epithelial barrier.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The Company has a limited operating history and the sales and income potential of the Company’s business and market are unproven. The Company has experienced losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception. At March 31, 2022, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $98.8 million and cash and cash equivalents of $6.6 million. The Company expects to continue to incur losses into the foreseeable future. The successful transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenues adequate to support the Company’s cost structure.

Historically, the Company has funded its operations primarily through a combination of debt and equity financings. Management anticipates continuing to raise additional capital from the sale of its securities or through agreements, such as potential partnering events of the Company’s existing technology. However, no assurance can be given as to whether the Company will achieve these objectives. Based on the Company’s current business plan, management believes that existing cash and cash equivalents will not be sufficient to fund the Company’s obligations for at least 12 months from the date of issuance of these financial statements. The Company’s ability to execute its operating plan depends on its ability to obtain additional funding through equity offerings, debt financings or potential licensing and collaboration arrangements. The financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company’s current working capital, anticipated operating expenses and net operating losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year following the date that these financial statements are issued. The financial statements do not include any adjustments for the ~~quarter ended June 30, 2021, originally filed~~recovery and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company plans to continue to fund its operations through cash and cash equivalents on hand, as well as through future equity offerings, debt financings, other third-party funding, and potential licensing or collaboration arrangements. On May 6, 2022, the

Company entered into definitive agreements with several investors for the purchase and sale in a registered direct offering of 3,646,690 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $0.55 per share (see Note 11, Subsequent Events). There can be no assurance that additional funds will be available when needed from any source or, if available, will be available on terms that are acceptable to the Company. Even if the Company raises additional capital, it may also be required to modify, delay or abandon some of its plans which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition and the Company’s ability to achieve its intended business objectives. Any of these actions could materially harm the Company’s business, results of operations and future prospects.

COVID-19

In April 2020, as a result of impacts and risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID-19), the Company paused enrollment and program activities surrounding the Company’s clinical trials of its lead therapeutic candidate, LB1148. Clinical trials of LB1148 have re-started in February 2022, although the Company continues to experience some delays or disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular with respect to activation of additional clinical trial sites and patient enrollment rates. In addition, supply chain constraints associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted the availability of the components needed in the manufacture of LB1148. Depending on the duration and impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on local and global supply chains, the Company's suppliers could continue to be adversely impacted, which may result in delays or disruptions in the Company's current or future supply chain.

The Company cannot predict how legal and regulatory responses to ongoing concerns about COVID-19 or other major public health issues will impact the Company’s business, nor can it predict potential adverse impacts related to the availability of capital to fund the Company’s operations. Any of these factors, alone or in combination with others, could harm the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. However, the magnitude, timing, and duration of any such potential financial impacts cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

In management’s opinion, the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may occur for the full year. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to instructions, rules and regulations prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ~~on August 23, 2021 (the “Original Form 10-Q”~~(“SEC”)~~, is being filed solely~~. The Company believes that the disclosures provided herein are adequate to ~~correct an administrative error~~make the information presented not misleading when these condensed consolidated financial statements are read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s financial statements filed on the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, which was filed with the SEC on March 17, 2022.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements prior to the closing of the Merger are representative of LBS’s operations as LBS was determined to be the accounting acquirer for financial reporting purpose. The condensed consolidated financial statements subsequent to the closing of the Merger include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Leading Biosciences, Inc. and Suzhou Neuralstem Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. All the entities are consolidated in the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements and all intercompany activity and transactions, if any, have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements relate to clinical trial accruals and the valuation of derivative liabilities and stock-based compensation instruments. Although these estimates are based on the Company’s knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may materially differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Segment Information

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, the Chief Executive Officer, in making decisions regarding resource allocation and

assessing performance. The Company views its operations and manages its business as 1 operating segment which consists of research and development activities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents represent cash available in readily available checking and money market accounts. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company held restricted cash of $26,000, in a separate restricted bank account as collateral for the Company’s corporate credit card program. The Company has classified these deposits as long-term restricted cash on its condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Deferred Equity Issuance Costs

On March 17, 2022, the Company filed a Form S-3 Shelf Registration Statement, as amended, with the SEC for the registration to offer and sell up to an aggregate amount of $100 million of the Company's securities (the "Shelf Registration"). Deferred equity issuance costs consist of the legal, accounting and other direct and incremental costs incurred by the Company related to the Shelf Registration. As of March 31, 2022, deferred equity issuance costs of $82,000 were included in prepaid and other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. There were 0 deferred equity issuance costs as of December 31, 2021. These costs will be netted against additional paid-in capital as a cost of the equity issuance pro-rata to the amount of future securities offerings pursuant to the Shelf Registration.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains deposits in federally insured financial institutions and in money market accounts, and at times balances may exceed federally insured limits. Management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held nor has the Company experienced any losses in these accounts.

Convertible Preferred Stock

The Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series C Convertible Preferred Stock") has been classified as temporary equity, in accordance with authoritative guidance for the classification and measurement of potentially redeemable securities as the stock is conditionally redeemable upon certain change in control events outside of the Company’s control, including the liquidation, sale or transfer of control of the Company. Upon such change in control events the holders of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock can cause its redemption.

In connection with the Merger, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock converted to Common Stock.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and derivative liabilities. The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their related fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s debt approximates its fair value due to the market rate of interest, which is based on level 2 inputs. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value based on level 3 inputs as defined below. None of the Company’s non-financial assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

The Company follows Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures which, among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tier fair value hierarchy has been established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

(1)

Level 1: observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

(2)

Level 2: inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

(3)

Level 3: unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Further information on the fair value of financial instruments can be found at Note 4, Fair Value Measurements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates its financial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company values its derivatives using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model or other acceptable valuation models, including Monte-Carlo simulations. Derivative instruments are valued at inception, upon events such as an exercise of the underlying financial instrument, and at subsequent reporting periods. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.

The Company reviews the terms of debt instruments, equity instruments, and other financing arrangements to determine whether there are embedded derivative features, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Additionally, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments, the Company may issue freestanding options and warrants, including options or warrants to non-employees in exchange for consulting or other services performed.

The Company accounts for its common stock warrants in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). Based upon the provisions of ASC 815, the Company accounts for common stock warrants as liabilities if the warrant requires net cash settlement or gives the holder the option of net cash settlement, or it fails the equity classification criteria. The Company accounts for common stock warrants as equity if the contract requires physical settlement or net physical settlement or if the Company has the option of physical settlement or net physical settlement and the warrants meet the requirements to be classified as equity. Common stock warrants classified as liabilities are initially recorded at fair value on the grant date and remeasured at fair value each balance sheet date with the offset adjustments recorded in change in fair value of warrant liability within the condensed consolidated statements of operations. If the terms of a common stock warrant previously classified as a liability are amended and pursuant to such amendment meet the requirements to be classified as equity, the common stock warrants are reclassified to equity at the fair value on the date of the amendment and are not subsequently remeasured. Common stock warrants classified as equity are initially measured at fair value on the grant date and are not subsequently remeasured.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel related expenses including stock-based compensation costs, preclinical costs, clinical trial costs, costs related to acquiring and manufacturing clinical trial materials, and contract services. All research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Clinical Trial Expenses

Expenses related to clinical studies are based on estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to the Company’s contract arrangements. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract, and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be instances in which payments made to the Company’s service providers will temporarily exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the clinical expense. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of patients, site initiation and the completion of clinical milestones. The Company makes estimates of its accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in its consolidated financial statements based on facts and circumstances known at that time. In accruing service fees, the Company estimates the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from its estimate, the Company adjusts the accrual or prepaid expense balance accordingly. Historically, the Company’s estimated accrued liabilities have materially approximated actual expense incurred. Clinical trial expenses are included in research and development expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Patent Costs

Costs related to filing and pursuing patent applications (including direct application fees, and the legal and consulting expenses related to making such applications) are expensed as incurred, as recoverability of such expenditures is uncertain. These costs are included in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs incurred to obtain debt financing are deferred and are amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs are recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the debt and are amortized to interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the ASC 740, Income Taxes, or ASC Topic 740 (“ASC 740”), in reporting deferred income taxes. ASC 740 requires a company to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future income tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some of or all the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions pursuant to ASC 740, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. If the tax position meets this threshold, the benefit to be recognized is measured as the tax benefit having the highest likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in the provision for income taxes.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost of the estimated grant date fair value of employee and non-employee stock option grants recognized over the requisite service period of the awards, which is usually the vesting period, on a straight-line basis. The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur as a reduction of expense. The Company estimates the fair value of employee and non-employee stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company’s Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants, the May 2021 Warrants, the July 2021 Warrants and the January 2022 Warrants (as defined at Note 4) contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends with the common stockholders, and therefore are considered to be participating securities. The Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the warrants do not have a contractual obligation to fund the losses of the Company; therefore, the application of the two-class method is not required when the Company is in a net loss position but is required when the Company is in a net income position. When in a net income position, diluted earnings per share is computed using the more dilutive of the two-class method or the if-converted and treasury stock methods.

As the Company was in a net loss position for both periods, basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 were calculated under the if-converted and treasury stock methods.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, basic and diluted loss per common share were the same as all common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive for both periods. The following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effects would be anti-dilutive:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021
Stock options		2,456,455		815,099
Warrants for common stock		5,347,517		289,931
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock		0		317,420
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock		6,479		0
Total		7,810,451		1,422,450

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as a change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company’s comprehensive loss was the same as its reported net loss for all periods presented.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2020, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2020-06,Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) — Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity ("ASU- 2020-06"), which, among other things, provides guidance on how to account for contracts on an entity’s own equity. This ASU simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. Specifically, the ASU eliminated the need for the Company to assess whether a contract on the entity’s own equity (1) permits settlement in unregistered shares, (2) whether counterparty rights rank higher stockholder’s rights, and (3) whether collateral is required. In addition, the ASU requires incremental disclosure related to contracts on the entity’s own equity and clarifies the treatment of certain financial instruments accounted for under this ASU on earnings per share. This ASU may be applied on a full retrospective of modified retrospective basis. For smaller reporting companies, this ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the ASU is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company early adopted this standard on January 1, 2022 and determined that it had no impact on the accounting for its common stock warrants as liabilities as of the date of adoption.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13,Financial Instruments — Credit Losses(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). The ASU introduced a new credit loss methodology, the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) methodology, which requires earlier recognition of credit losses, while also providing additional transparency about credit risk. The CECL methodology utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for loans, held-to maturity debt securities, trade receivables and other receivables measured at amortized cost at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. After the issuance of ASU 2016-13, the FASB issued several additional ASUs to clarify implementation guidance, provide narrow-scope improvements and provide additional disclosure guidance. In November 2019, the FASB issued an amendment making this ASU effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 for smaller reporting companies. The Company plans to adopt this standard in the first quarter of 2023 and does not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on its financial statements and related disclosures.

3. Balance Sheet Details

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31,		December 31,
	2022		2021
Accrued accounts payable	$	399	$	195
Accrued clinical trial costs		69		158
Accrued director stipends		112		110
	$	580	$	463

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):


	March 31,		December 31,
	2022		2021
Prepaid insurance	$	1,120	$	1,408
Other receivables		86		150
Prepaid subscriptions and fees		210		215
Prepaid software licenses		90		78
Deposits		26		26
Deferred equity costs		82		0
Prepaid other		0		2
	$	1,614	$	1,879

4. Fair Value Measurements

The Company has issued warrants that are accounted for as liabilities. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of

the Company’s common stock. Because derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, the Company’s financial results will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes. Changes in fair value are recognized as a component of other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

In connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger, on December 16, 2020, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the "Securities Purchase Agreement") with Altium Growth Fund, LP (the “Investor”) pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to issue (i) senior secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of up to $5.0 million, in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of up to $3.75 million, representing an aggregate original issue discount of up to $1.25 million (the “Senior Secured Promissory Notes”), and (i) warrants (“Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants”) to purchase shares of the Company’s common ~~stock, as~~stock. In connection with the Merger, on April 27, 2021, the outstanding principal and interest on both tranches of ~~August~~the Senior Secured Promissory Notes were cancelled for shares of Series 1 Preferred Stock of the Company. As of March 31, 2022, there is no principal or interest outstanding on the Senior Secured Promissory Notes.

On May 20, 2021, ~~listed on~~pursuant to the ~~cover page. The cover page~~terms of ~~this Amendment correctly states that~~the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to the Investor warrants to purchase 4,995,893 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.70 per share (the “May 2021 Warrants”). In June 2021, pursuant to the reset provisions of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the number of shares of common stock underlying the May 2021 Warrants increased to 5,303,568 shares and the exercise price was reduced to $3.88 per share.

On July 21, 2021, the Company and the Investor entered into an agreement to waive certain provisions of the previous Security Purchase Agreement (the "July 2021 Waiver Agreement"). As part of the July 2021 Waiver Agreement, the Investor agreed to waive the reset provisions of the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants and the May 2021 Warrants such that the number of shares and exercise price in effect immediately prior to the effective date of the Waiver Agreement shall no longer be subject to price-based resets. The waiver of the reset provision of the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants and the May 2021 Warrants is considered a modification to those warrants and as a result, the underlying warrants were re-valued using a Black-Scholes based valuation model, which resulted in a favorable change in the fair value of the underlying warrants of $3.9 million. As consideration for the Waiver Agreement, the Company issued the Investor additional warrants to purchase 1,100,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.63 per share (the "July 2021 Warrants").

On January 31, 2022, the Company and the Investor entered into an agreement to irrevocably waive any adjustment to the exercise price of the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants and the May 2021 Warrants held by the Investor from and after the Effective Date for the Company's issuances of equity or equity-linked securities at a price below the exercise price of the warrants (the "January 2022 Waiver Agreement"). The waiver of any adjustments to the exercise price of the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants and the May 2021 Warrants is considered a modification to those warrants.

As consideration for the foregoing, pursuant to the January 2022 Waiver Agreement, the Company issued the Investor an additional warrant to purchase up to 2,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “January 2022 Warrant”). The initial fair value of the January 2022 Warrants was determined to be $1.1 million and is included in loss on issuance of warrants in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The initial fair value was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model that considered: (i) the starting stock price of $1.17, (ii) certain key event dates such as expected capital financings, if any, (iii) an expected re-levered volatility of 93.0 percent, (iv) an estimated risk-free interest rate of 1.65 percent, (v) an estimated contractual term of approximately 5.5 years, and (vi) a zero percent dividend rate.

All of the outstanding May 2021 Warrants were exercised in exchange for 5,303,568 shares of the Company's common stock in a series of exercises by the Investor. As of March 31, 2022, there are 0 May 2021 Warrants outstanding.

As of March 31, 2022, the fair value of the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants in the amount of $0.3 million was determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model that used the following assumptions: (i) a stock price of $1.06, (ii) an exercise price per share of $3.88, (iii) an estimated risk-free interest rate of approximately 2.43 percent, (iv) an estimated contractual term of 4.4 years, (v) volatility of 73.1%, and (vi) a 0 percent dividend rate.

As of March 31, 2022, the fair value of the January 2022 Warrants in the amount of $1.0 million was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model that used the following assumptions: (i) a starting stock price of $1.09, (ii) certain key event dates such as expected capital financings, if any, (iii) an expected re-levered volatility of 97.1 percent; (iv) an estimated risk-free rate of 2.42 percent, (v) estimated contractual terms of approximately 5.33 years, and (vi) a 0 percent dividend rate.

As of March 31, 2022, the fair value of the July 2022 Warrants in the amount of $0.4 million was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model that considered: (i) a starting stock price of $1.09, (ii) certain key event dates such as expected capital financings, if any, (iii) an expected re-levered volatility of 90.7 percent; (iv) an estimated risk-free rate of 2.42 percent, (v) estimated contractual terms of approximately 4.8 years, and (vi) a 0 percent dividend rate.

The following table summarizes the activity of the Company’s Level 3 warrant liabilities during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
Warrant Liabilities	2022			2021
Fair value at beginning of period	$	2,651		$	1,830
Initial fair value at the original issuance date		1,110			1,832
Change in fair value during the period		(793	)		(42	)
Fair value of warrants exercised		(1,274	)		0
Fair value at end of period	$	1,694		$	3,620

At December 31, 2021, Seneca had certain common stock purchase warrants that were originally issued in connection with the May 2016 and August 2017 offerings that are accounted for as liabilities whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. The May 2016 warrants expired in the second quarter of 2021. As a result of the Merger, the put right was activated on the August 2017 offering warrants and these warrants were valued at their put right value using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company settled the put feature for 7,813 of these warrants during the quarter ended June 30, 2021. The put right became inactive in July 2021 and the remaining warrants were valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The gains resulting from the changes in the fair value of the liability classified warrants are classified as a gain on change in fair value of warrant liability in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

5. Stockholders’ Equity

Classes of Stock

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company was authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value Common Stock and 7,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value Series A 4.5% Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A Convertible Preferred Stock"). Each share of Common Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to one (1) vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of stockholders. As of March 31, 2022, the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued in the amount of 200,000 is convertible into 6,479 shares of common stock.

As of March 31, 2021, LBS was authorized to issue 6,797,500 shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 33,594,625 shares of $0.001 par value Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. In connection with the Merger, the issued and outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shares in the amount of 11,674,131 were converted to 317,420 shares of the Company's common stock.

6. Common Stock Warrants

From time to time, the Company issues warrants to its investors, creditors and various other individuals. The Company’s outstanding common stock warrants that are classified as equity warrants are included as a component of stockholder’s equity at the date of grant at the relative fair value at that grant date. Common stock warrants accounted for as liabilities are included in non-current liabilities. The warrants have an exercise price ranging from $1.10 to $694.80 per share and generally expire between five and ten years after the date of issuance. The Company had common stock warrants issuable and outstanding of 5,347,517 and 7,181,741, at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

January 2022 Waiver Agreement

On January 31, 2022, the Company and the Investor entered into the January 2022 Waiver Agreement (See Note 4). In addition to irrevocably waiving any adjustment to the exercise price of the Senior Secured Promissory Note Warrants and the May 2021 Warrants held by the Investor from and after the Effective Date for the Company's issuances of equity or equity-linked securities at a price below the exercise price of the warrants, the January 2022 Waiver Agreement also includes agreement by the parties to, among other things, (i) restrict the Investor's ability to sell the Company's securities through a "leak out" provision whereby sales are restricted by applying a volume limitation, (ii) shorten the notice period for the Investor’s participation rights related to certain future securities offerings, (iii) restrict the Company’s ability to conduct a primary offering of its securities for a specified period of time, and (iv) provide registration rights for the shares underlying the January 2022 Warrant.

As consideration for the foregoing, pursuant to the January 2022 Waiver Agreement, the Company issued the Investor the January 2022 Warrant. The January 2022 Warrant is exercisable beginning six months following the Effective Date. The exercise price for the January 2022 Warrant is $1.10 (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 28, 2022), subject to customary adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, stock combinations, reclassifications and similar transactions.

May 2021 Warrant Exercises

In the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Investor exchanged the remaining 3,994,302 May 2021 warrants into shares of the Company’s common stock in cashless exercises. Following these exercises, the May 2021 Warrants were fully exercised. As of March 31, 2022, there are no May 2021 Warrants outstanding.

The following table summarizes warrant activity for the three months ended March 31, 2022:


	Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2021		7,181,741		$	5.96		4.45
Granted		2,250,000		$	1.10		5.33
Exercised		(3,994,302	)	$	3.88		—
Forfeited, expired or cancelled		(89,922	)	$	80.72		—
Warrants outstanding, March 31, 2022		5,347,517		$	4.20		4.64

7. Equity Incentive Plans

In 2013, LBS adopted the 2013 Employee, Director, and Consultant Equity Incentive Plan, (as amended and restated, the “2013 Plan”). Upon the closing of the Merger, each outstanding, unexercised and unexpired LBS option under the 2013 Plan, whether vested or unvested, was assumed by the Company and converted into Palisade options and became exercisable by the holder of such option in accordance with its terms, with (i) the number of shares of common stock subject to each option multiplied by the Exchange Ratio and (ii) the per share exercise price upon the exercise of each option divided by the Exchange Ratio. In connection with the closing of the Merger, 0 further awards will be made under the 2013 Plan.

In April 2021, in connection with the closing of the Merger, the Company’s stockholders approved the Palisade Bio, Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 EIP Plan”). The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2021 EIP Plan will not exceed 1,502,583 shares. In addition, such aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance will automatically increase on January 1 of each year for a period of ten years commencing on January 1, 2022 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2031, in an amount equal to 4% of the total number of shares of the Company's common stock outstanding on ~~August 20,~~December 31st of the preceding year; provided, however, that the board of directors may act prior to January 1st of a given year to provide that the increase for such year will be a lesser number of shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2022, there were 662,414 shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2021 EIP Plan.

Also in April 2021, the Company stockholders approved the Palisade Bio, Inc. 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2021 ESPP"). The 2021 ESPP was ~~12,908,594.~~

~~This Amendment is limited~~adopted in ~~scope~~order to provide eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to purchase shares of the Company's common stock. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2021 ESPP will not exceed 693,500 shares. In addition, such aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance will automatically increase on January 1 of each year for a period of ten years commencing on January 1, 2022 and ending on (and including) January 1, 2031, in an amount equal to 1% of the total number of shares of the Company's common stock outstanding on December 31st of the preceding year; provided, however, that the board of directors may act prior to January 1st of a given year to provide that the increase for such year will be a lesser number of shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2022, there have been 0 shares issued under the ESPP.

In November 2021, the Company's compensation committee of the board of directors adopted the Palisade Bio, Inc. 2021 Inducement Award Plan (the "2021 Inducement Plan"). The 2021 Inducement Plan was adopted in order to grant share-based awards to individuals not previously employed by the Company, as an inducement to join the Company. Subject to certain changes in the capitalization of the Company, as provided in the 2021 Inducement Plan document, the aggregate number of shares of the Company's common stock that may be issued under the 2021 Inducement Plan will not exceed 750,000 shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2022, there are 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock available for issuance under the 2021 Inducement Plan.

Stock Options

The Company believes that stock options align the interests of its employees, consultants and directors with the interests of its stockholders. Stock option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the ~~correction described above~~market price of Company’s stock at the date the grants are awarded, a term as determined by the Company's board of directors but generally not to exceed ten-years, and generally vest in equal proportions each quarter over three years. Vesting would be accelerated in the event of retirement, disability, or death of a participant, or change in control of the Company, as defined in the individual stock option agreements. Stock awards are valued as of

the measurement date, which is the grant date, and are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period for all awards. The Company's plans allow for the issuance of both incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options.

There were 0 stock options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2021.

The fair value of options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2022 is estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions in the following table:


	March 31,
	2022
Weighted-average exercise price per share	$	0.97
Weighted-average expected term (years)		5.81
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate		1.85	%
Weighted-average expected dividend yield		0
Weighted-average volatility		73.77	%

Risk-free interest rate. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate assumption on observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the stock option grants.

Expected dividend yield. The Company bases the expected dividend yield assumption on the fact that it has never paid cash dividends and has no present intention to pay cash dividends.

Expected volatility. Due to the Company’s limited operating history and lack of company-specific historical or implied volatility, the expected volatility assumption is based on historical volatilities of a peer group of similar companies whose share prices are publicly available. The peer group was developed based on companies in the biotechnology industry.

Expected term. The expected term represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding. As the Company does not ~~amend, update or change any other items or disclosures contained~~have sufficient historical exercise behavior, it determines the expected life assumption using the simplified method, which is an average of the contractual term of the option and its vesting period.

The following table summarizes stock option activity and related information under the 2013 Plan, the 2021 EIP Plan and the 2021 Inducement Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2022:


	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2021		1,956,855	$	7.32		8.37	$	0
Granted		499,600		0.97		9.86		—
Exercised		0		—		—		—
Forfeited, expired or cancelled		0		0		—		—
Outstanding at March 31, 2022		2,456,455		6.03		8.57		43
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2022		2,456,455		6.03		8.57		43
Exercisable at March 31, 2022		946,865	$	12.60		6.77	$	0

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2022 was $0.63 per share. The fair value of the options vested during three months ended March 31, 2022 was approximately $0.4 million.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

The allocation of stock-based compensation for all stock awards is as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022		2021

Research and development expense	$	52	$	274
General and administrative		306		295
Total	$	358	$	569

As of March 31, 2022, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options was $1.9 million which was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.13 years.

Officer Settlement Agreements

The Company’s former Chief Development Officer was terminated in February 2021. As part of the separation package, the Company’s board of directors agreed to (i) accelerate vesting by four months for the former employee’s outstanding options and (ii) allow up to seven years from the termination date for the former employee to exercise all vested options. The Company concluded the actions taken by the Company resulted in modification accounting for the stock options. The Company determined the incremental fair value of the modified stock options was $225,000, which was expensed to research and development expenses in the ~~Original~~condensed consolidated statements of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2021.

8. Collaborations and License Agreements

Co-Development and Distribution Agreement with Newsoara

The Company has entered into a co-development and distribution agreement, as amended, (the “Co-Development Agreement”), with Newsoara Biopharma Co., Ltd. (“Newsoara”). Pursuant to the Co-Development Agreement, the Company granted Newsoara an exclusive co-development right under certain patents, two of which have subsequently been assigned to Newsoara, and know-how owned or controlled by the Company to develop, use, sell, offer to sell, import, and otherwise commercialize licensed products (the “Licensed Products”) for any and all indications in the People’s Republic of China, including the regions of Hong Kong and Macao, but excluding Taiwan (the “Territory”). The Licensed Products only include the Company's lead drug candidate, LB1148. The Co-Development Agreement obligates Newsoara to initially use the Company as the exclusive supplier for all of Newsoara’s requirements for Licensed Products in the Territory.

In consideration of the rights granted to Newsoara under the Co-Development Agreement, Newsoara paid the Company a one-time upfront fee of $1.0 million and a six-digit regulatory milestone payment in 2018. In addition, Newsoara is obligated to make (i) additional payments of up to $6.75 million in the aggregate upon achievement of certain regulatory and commercial milestones, (ii) payments in the low six-digit range per licensed product upon achievement of a regulatory milestone and (iii) tiered royalty payments ranging from the mid-single-digit to low-double-digit percentage range on annual net sales of Licensed Products, subject to adjustment to the royalty percentage in certain events. For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and the three months ended March 31, 2021, there were 0 milestone payments earned from Newsoara under the Co-Development Agreement.

License Agreements with the Regents of the University of California

The Company has entered into 3 license agreements, as amended, with the Regents of the University of California (“Regents”) for exclusive commercial rights to certain patents, technology and know-how. The licensed assets are related to the Company’s products and assays under development. The Regents are entitled to certain development and sales milestones and sales royalties.

In conjunction with the Co-Development Agreement with Newsoara, the Company is obligated to pay the Regents royalties for its portion of the sublicense income equal to 30 percent of one-third of the upfront payment and milestone payment received. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 a sublicensing payable of approximately $70,000 and $81,000, respectively, was included in accounts payable.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Facility Lease

The Company leases office space for its corporate headquarters under a non-cancelable facility operating lease for 4,911 square feet located in Carlsbad, California.

In July 2019, the Company entered into a facility operating lease (the “July 2019 Headquarter Lease”) at this location. The initial contractual term is three years commencing on August 1, 2019 and expiring on July 31, 2022. The Company has the option to renew this lease for an additional 36-month period at the prevailing market rent upon completion of the initial lease term. The Company has determined it is not reasonably certain that it will exercise this renewal option. Therefore, the lease term is determined to be a total of three years commencing on August 1, 2019 and expiring on July 31, 2022. Commencing in August 2019, the Company is subject to contractual monthly lease payments of $16,000 for the first 12 months with 3 percent escalations at the first and second lease commencement anniversary. The Company incurred cost associated with the lease of $49,000 during each the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The July 2019 Headquarter Lease is also subject to additional variable charges for common area maintenance, insurance, taxes and other operating costs. This additional variable rent expense is not estimable at lease inception. Therefore, it is excluded from the Company’s straight-line expense calculation at lease inception and is expensed as incurred. All fixed and variable lease payment amounts were recorded within general and administrative expenses on the statement of operations.

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the weighted-average remaining lease term on the July 2019 Headquarter Lease was 0.4 years and 0.6 years, respectively, and the weighted-average discount rate on the lease was 15% for both periods. As of March 31, 2022, the total remaining future minimum lease payments associated with the lease of approximately $67,000, less imputed interest of $2,000, will be paid in the second and third quarters of 2022.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various lawsuits, legal proceedings, or claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management believes there are no claims or actions pending against the Company through March 31, 2022, which will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on its business, liquidity, financial position, or results of operations. Litigation, however, is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in such matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company’s business.

Indemnification

In accordance with the Company’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Company has indemnification obligations to its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they are serving in such capacity. There have been no claims to date, and the Company has a directors and officers liability insurance policy that may enable it to recover a portion of any amounts paid for future claims.

10. Related Party Transactions

Related Party Warrants

On August 19, 2021, pursuant to the terms of a Security Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to Yuma Regional Medical Center, a related party, a warrant to purchase up to 377,474 shares of Common Stock at a price of $3.45 per share, subject to certain adjustments (the "August 2021 Warrants"). The August 2021 Warrants are immediately exercisable and will have a term of five years from the date all of the shares underlying the August 2021 Warrants have been registered for resale.

Director stipends

Unpaid cash stipends owed to the Company's directors for their annual board service are recorded on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets within accrued liabilities. These liabilities were $112,500 and $110,000 as of March 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, respectively.

11. Subsequent Events

Facility Lease

On May 12, 2022, the Company entered into a new non-cancelable facility operating lease (the "Lease") of office space for its corporate headquarters, replacing its existing corporate headquarters lease expiring on July 31, 2022 (see Note 9). The Lease is for approximately 2,747 square feet of an office building in Carlsbad, California. The initial contractual term is three years commencing on June 1, 2022 and expiring on August 31, 2025. The Company has the option to renew the Lease for an additional 36-month period at the prevailing market rent upon completion of the initial lease term. Commencing on June 1, 2022, the Company is subject to contractual monthly lease payments of $10,850, plus certain utilities, for the first 12 months with 3 percent escalations at the first, second and third lease commencement anniversaries. The Lease is subject to conditional abatement of fifty percent (50%) of such the base rent during the second, third and fourth full calendar months of the initial Lease term, as set forth in the Lease.

Insurance Financing Arrangement

Consistent with past practice, on May 9, 2022 the Company entered into an agreement to finance certain insurance policies which renewed in April 2022. The amount financed through the arrangement is approximately $0.8 million at a stated interest rate of 3.82%

and is payable over a 9-month period commencing with the first payment on May 27, 2022. The financing arrangement is secured by the associated insurance policy.

Registered Direct Offering

On May 6, 2022, the Company entered into definitive agreements with several investors for the purchase and sale in a registered direct offering of 3,646,690 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $0.55 per share.

The Company also agreed to issue to the investors in a concurrent private placement, unregistered warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 3,646,690 shares of its common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.7105 per share of common stock, will be exercisable six months after the date of issuance, and will expire five and a half years following the initial issuance date.

The shares of common stock (but not the warrants or the shares of common stock underlying such warrants) offered in the registered direct offering are being offered and sold by the Company pursuant to a "shelf" registration statement on Form ~~10-Q. Accordingly, all other items that remain unaffected are omitted~~S-3, including a base prospectus, previously filed with and declared effective by the SEC on April 26, 2022.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements in this ~~filing. Except as described~~Quarterly Report that are not strictly historical are forward-looking statements and include statements about products in development, the Company's in-licensing/acquisition strategy, the Company's out-licensing sales strategy, results and analyses of pre-clinical studies, clinical trials and studies, research and development expenses, cash expenditures, financing or funding sources, and alliances and partnerships, among other matters. You can identify these forward-looking statements because they involve the Company's expectations, intentions, beliefs, plans, projections, anticipations, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the ~~preceding paragraph, we do~~forward-looking statements as a result of any number of factors. Some of these factors are more fully discussed, as are other factors, in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K , as filed with the SEC, in the Company's subsequent filings with the SEC as well as in the section of this Quarterly Report entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere herein. The Company does not ~~purport by this Amendment~~undertake to update any of these forward-looking statements or announce the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements except as required by law.

The Company recommends investors read this entire Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the “Risk Factors” section, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and related notes. As used in this Quarterly Report, unless the context otherwise requires, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “Palisade” refers to Palisade Bio, Inc. and its subsidiary, post-Merger. Also, any reference to “common shares” or “common stock,” refers to the Company's $0.01 par value common stock. Any reference to “Series A Preferred Stock” or “Preferred Stock” refers to the Company's Series A 4.5% Convertible Preferred Stock. Any reference to “Series C Preferred Stock” refers to the Series C Preferred Stock. Any reference to “Leading Biosciences, Inc.” or “LBS” refers to the Company’s operations prior to the completion of the Merger. The information contained ~~in the Original Form 10-Q, which continues to speak~~herein is current as of the ~~original~~date of this Quarterly Report (March 31, 2022), unless another date is specified.

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is provided, in addition to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes, to assist you in understanding the Company's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The MD&A is organized as follows:

•

Executive Overview — Discussion of the Company's business and overall analysis of financial and other items affecting the Company in order to provide context for the remainder of MD&A.

•

Results of Operations — Analysis of the Company's financial results comparing the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021.

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources — An analysis of cash flows and discussion of the Company's financial condition and future liquidity needs.

Executive Overview

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing innovative oral therapies that target serious diseases associated with the breakdown of the mucosal barrier protecting the gastrointestinal (“GI”) tract. Our goal is to be an industry leader in developing therapies to treat these diseases and to improve the lives of patients suffering from such diseases.

On April 27, 2021, Seneca Biopharma, Inc. (“Seneca”) completed its previously announced merger transaction with Leading BioSciences, Inc. (“LBS”) in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 16, 2020 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Seneca, Townsgate Acquisition Sub 1, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Seneca (“Merger Sub”), and LBS, pursuant to which Merger Sub merged with and into LBS, with LBS surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Seneca (the “Merger”). Immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, LBS merged with and into Merger Sub and LBS continued to exist as the surviving corporation. Concurrent with the closing of the Merger, on April 27, 2021 the Company effected a 1-for-6 reverse stock split (“Reverse Stock Split”) of its common stock. Stockholders’ equity and all references to share and per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 1-for-6 reverse stock split for all periods presented. Immediately following the Merger, Seneca changed its name to “Palisade Bio, Inc.”

Our approach is founded on the discovery that damage to the intestinal epithelial barrier can result in the leakage of digestive enzymes from the GI tract that can damage tissues and promote inflammation, causing a broad array of acute and chronic conditions.

We are focused on developing a portfolio of oral product candidates to treat conditions driven by protease (intestinal enzymes) leakage through the intestinal epithelial barrier, including by surgical complications and inflammatory conditions. The below graphic illustrates the protease leakage resulting from a compromised intestinal epithelial barrier:

Our lead therapeutic candidate, LB1148, is an oral liquid formulation of the well-characterized digestive enzyme inhibitor, tranexamic acid, intended to inhibit digestive enzyme activity and preserve gut integrity during intestinal stress resulting from, among other things, reduced blood flow to the intestine, infections, or due to surgery. Peer reviewed publications of third-party research suggest that digestive enzyme leakage from the GI tract increases incidences of GI and organ dysfunction following these events.

Our pipeline of LB1148(1) is illustrated in this chart:

* Anticipated

(1) Commercial right to LB1148 in Greater China (excluding Taiwan) have been out-licensed to Newsoara.

We are initially developing LB1148 to be administered to patients prior to major surgeries that risk disrupting the intestinal mucosal barrier. On July 20, 2021, we and our co-development partner Newsoara announced topline Phase 2 clinical trial data demonstrating that LB1148 had a statistically significant (p=0.0008) effect in accelerating the return of bowel function in patients undergoing elective bowel resection surgery.

Results from the trial include:

•

A 1.1-day improvement in GI recovery in patients receiving LB1148 vs placebo. The median time to return of bowel function was 2.77 days in patients treated with LB1148 and 3.83 days in those receiving placebo (hazard ratio = 1.886; p = 0.0008).

•

The difference between groups increased at the 3rd quartile (75th percentile), with LB1148 (3.4 days) demonstrating a 1.5-day faster recovery of bowel function compared to placebo (4.9 days).

•

LB1148 was well tolerated with 10.9% and 4.8% of patients in the LB1148 group and placebo group, respectively, experiencing a drug-related adverse event.

•

The most common drug-related adverse events were GI disorders (LB1148 4.7% vs. placebo 3.2%).

•

No drug-related serious adverse events were reported in the trial.

We and Newsoara are advancing LB1148 to Phase 3 clinical trials for accelerating the return of bowel function for major surgical indications. As announced on March 22, 2022, we received the “Study May Proceed” letter from the FDA for a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating LB1148 to accelerate the return of bowel function in adult patients undergoing bowel/abdominal surgery. The clinical trial will enroll approximately 600 subjects undergoing a scheduled bowel resection surgery that will include either laparotomy or laparoscopic surgical approaches. The Company intends to initiate the Phase 3 clinical trial in the second quarter of 2022.

On May 5, 2022, in partnership with Newsoara, we announced clearance from the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) of the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of the People's Republic of China to commence a randomized, multi-center, double-blind Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating LB1148 to accelerate the return of bowel function following abdominal surgery. As described in the existing licensing agreement, Newsoara is responsible for development costs of LB1148 in China

Adhesion prevalence is reported to be >90% in patients who have abdominal surgery and represents a significant contribution to serious complications such as small bowel obstruction, infertility, chronic abdominal pain, subsequent surgery, and other morbidities. On March 16, 2022 we announced data from a pooled-analysis of studies LBS-IST-POI-101 and LBS-POI-201-CN (PROFILE-CN) at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2022 Annual Meeting. The results from the pooled analysis showed that 8/9 (89%) of subjects in the placebo group versus 2/8 (25%) in the LB1148 group had adhesions observed during a second follow-up surgery, representing a relative risk reduction of 72% (p = 0.0152). The mean total adhesion score which measures both the extent and severity of adhesions was 1.0 (8/8) for LB1148 and 14.3 (129/9) for placebo, representing relative risk reduction of 93% (p = 0.0162). We believe the reduction in the incidence of post-surgical intra-abdominal adhesions as well as the reduction in the extent and

severity of adhesions provides preliminary evidence of the clinically meaningful efficacy of LB1148 to reduce post-surgical adhesions when compared to placebo. LB1148 has received Fast Track designation from the FDA for reduction of adhesions following abdominal and pelvic surgery.

We are currently conducting a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept Phase 2 clinical trial of LB1148 in patients undergoing elective bowel resection surgery in the United States. This trial will enroll up to 200 total patients, with approximately 70 of those patients having a planned adhesions evaluation. This trial will evaluate whether or not patients treated with LB1148 experience fewer postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions and quicker return of bowel function following surgery.

As announced in March 2020, a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled Phase 2 investigator-sponsored clinical trial of LB1148 in 120 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or heart valve replacement surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass was completed. Patients were randomized to receive LB1148 or placebo in conjunction with surgery. The trial’s primary endpoint was time to return of bowel function. Secondary endpoints include Intensive Care Unit (“ICU”) length of stay, hospital length of stay, organ function changes, inflammatory response and glucose control. LB1148 provided an approximately 30% improvement in the time to normal bowel function following cardiovascular (“CV”) surgery (p<0.001) compared to placebo. The treatment group also had an average 1.0-day shorter length of stay in the ICU and an average 1.1-day shorter hospital stay. Generally, treatment with LB1148 was well tolerated. Adverse events were similar between the treatment groups and not considered unexpected for the subject population. None of the adverse events or serious adverse events reported were considered drug-related by the sponsor-investigator. One of the primary factors in discharging patients from the hospital following surgery is the return of bowel function. LB1148 has been granted Fast Track designation from the FDA for the treatment of postoperative GI dysfunction (which may present as feeding intolerance, ileus, necrotizing enterocolitis (“NEC”), etc.) associated with gut hypoperfusion injury in pediatric patients who have undergone congenital heart disease repair surgery.

LB1148 contains a broad-spectrum serine protease inhibitor, tranexamic acid (“TXA”), and is formulated as an aqueous solution for oral (or enteral) administration. In addition to TXA, the patented LB1148 formulation contains polyethylene glycol, carbohydrates, and electrolytes. The components of LB1148 are provided as dry powders for reconstitution in water prior to administration. Such reconstitution is carried out in an outpatient setting (by the patient) or may be carried out in pharmacy (by a pharmacist).

The potential of LB1148 relies on its formulation as a liquid composition for oral administration, which is designed to stop the downstream effects of a disruption of the intestinal mucosal barrier. We are not aware of any other approved oral TXA-containing liquid compositions in the marketplace suitable for such administration.

We believe that LB1148, if successfully developed and approved, may have the ability to become the standard of care across a broad range of acute and chronic conditions associated with GI barrier dysfunction.

Contingent Value Right

Immediately prior to the closing of the Merger, Seneca issued each share of its common stock held by Seneca stockholders of record, one contingent value right (“CVR”). Each CVR entitles the holder of such right (the “CVR Holder”) to receive their pro-rata share of 80% of the net proceeds, subject to certain conditions ("CVR Payment Amount"), if any, derived from the sale or licensing of all or any part of the intellectual property owned, licensed or controlled by Seneca immediately prior to the closing of the Merger (the “Legacy Technology”) provided however that CVR Holders will only be entitled to receive such CVR Payment Amount if the sale or licensing of such Legacy Technology occurs on or before the 18-month anniversary of such closing (“Legacy Monetization”). Additionally, pursuant to the terms of the CVR agreement ("CVR Agreement"), CVR Holders are only entitled to participate in their pro-rata share of net proceeds which we receive during the 48-month period following the closing of the Merger. As discussed below, we entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement ("ATA") to potentially monetize one Legacy Technology whereby the licensee purchased the assets underlying the NSI-189 License. We are unable to determine if we will be successful in the sale or licensing of any of the remaining Legacy Technology. In the event we are not able to sell or license the remaining Legacy Technology, or the CVR Payment Amount is not greater than the minimum amount requiring distribution pursuant to the terms of the CVR Agreement, CVR Holders may not receive any proceeds from their CVRs and the CVRs may expire valueless.

NSI-189 – Exclusive License and Subsequent Exercise of Purchase Option

As previously disclosed, on December 16, 2020, Seneca exclusively licensed certain patents and technologies, including a sublicense covering a synthetic intermediate, of our NSI-189 assets (“189 License”), along with a purchase option through December 16, 2023 (“Purchase Option”). On October 22, 2021, Alto Neuroscience agreed to terms of an early exercise of the Purchase Option under the 189 License and entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement (“ATA”). Alto Neuroscience is a U.S. based private biopharmaceutical company focused on precision-medicine for central nervous system disorders, including depression, using artificial intelligence-based brain biomarkers.

In connection with the ATA, we received gross proceeds of $0.4 million. Pursuant to the terms of the CVR Agreement, no distribution is required to be made to the holders of the CVR if the CVR Payment Amount would be less than $0.5 million. In accordance with the terms of the CVR Agreement, the net proceeds from the sale of the NSI-189 assets, less any applicable transaction costs and expenses,

were deposited into the CVR escrow to be used to pay costs and expenses associated with the monetization of our other Legacy Technologies, which may include but are not limited to: financial advisory and consulting fees, legal fees, and any other fees associated with the monetization. There can be no assurance that NSI-566 will ever be successfully monetized or that CVR holders will receive CVR Payment Amounts from the sale of the NSI-189 assets.

NSI-566

We engaged a financial advisor to assist in monetizing NSI-566, the Company's stem cell therapeutic. As of May 13, 2022, we do not have sufficient information to determine if the Company will be successful in the sale or licensing of NSI-566.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s estimates are based on historical experience, known trends, events and various other factors that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. In making estimates and judgments, management employs critical accounting policies.

The Company's significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statement are described in more detail in Note 2 to the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Company's critical accounting estimates, identified in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of the Company's most recently filed Form 10-K, include the discussion of estimates used for accrued research and development expenses, share-based compensation, derivative financial instruments, and common stock fair value. Such accounting policies and estimates require significant judgments and assumptions to be used in the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q, and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

See Note 2 to the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Amounts discussed herein related to the Company's financial condition and results of operations prior to the closing of the Merger are representative of LBS’s operations. The financial condition and results of operations subsequent to the closing of the Merger include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Leading Biosciences, Inc. and Suzhou Neuralstem Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Revenue

The Company generated no revenues from the sale of its proposed therapies for any of the periods presented.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for the clinical development of the Company's lead product candidate LB1148, which include:

•

salaries and employee-related costs, including stock-based compensation;

•

laboratory and vendor expenses related to the execution of preclinical and clinical trials;

•

expenses under agreements with third-party contract research organizations, investigative clinical trial sites that conduct research and development activities on the Company’s behalf, and consultants;

•

costs related to develop and manufacture preclinical study and clinical trial material; and

•

regulatory expenses.

The Company’s direct research and development expenses are tracked by product candidate and consist primarily of external costs, such as fees paid under third-party license agreements and to outside consultants, CROs, clinical site, contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) and research laboratories in connection with its preclinical development, process development, manufacturing, clinical development, and regulatory activities. The Company does not allocate employee costs and costs associated with its discovery efforts, laboratory supplies and facilities, including other indirect costs, to specific product candidates because these costs are deployed across multiple programs and, as such, are not separately classified. The Company primarily uses internal resources to conduct its research as well as for managing its preclinical development, process development, and clinical development activities.

The Company's research and development expenses were $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2022. The Company expects research and development expenses to continue to increase in 2022 as it executes on its clinical development plan for LB1148. Accordingly, management expects research and development expense will become a larger percentage of the Company's overall operating expenses in future quarters. In particular, the Company expects the costs associated with investigative clinical trial sites that conduct research and development activities on the Company's behalf to increase as the Company accepts new sites and new patients into its clinical trials. Similarly, the Company expects the vendor expenses related to the execution of clinical trials to continue to increase in 2022, as well as costs related to the development and manufacture of LB1148.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salary and employee-related costs and benefits, professional fees for legal, intellectual property, consulting, investor and public relations, accounting and audit services, insurance costs, director's fees and stipends, and general corporate expenses. The Company's general and administrative expenses of $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2022 included higher-than-normal costs associated with professional fees, investor and public relations fees, and recruiting fees. Although difficult to predict given the timing of certain expenditures, management expects general and administrative expense in each of the remaining quarters of 2022 will be lower than what they were in the first quarter of 2022.

Going Concern

The Company’s management has disclosed in Note 1 to the financial statements included herein that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year following the filing date of ~~the Original~~this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

This determination was based on the following factors: (i) the Company’s available cash as of the date of this filing will not be sufficient to fund its anticipated level of operations for the next 12 months; (ii) the Company will require additional financing during the second half of 2022 to continue at its expected level of operations; and (iii) if the Company fails to obtain the needed capital, it will be forced to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of its development activities or perhaps cease operations. In the opinion of management, these factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern as of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and for one year from the issuance of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in quarantines, restrictions on travel and other business and economic disruptions, and had a negative impact on the Company's ability to conduct clinical trials of its lead drug candidate, LB1148. Supply chain constraints associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted the availability of the components needed in the manufacture of LB1148 and, depending on the duration and extent of the pandemic or new strains, could impact the components and production capacity required for a commercial scale-up of LB1148. The Company believes it has sufficient supply or plans for supply to meet its clinical and nonclinical development needs through the remainder of 2022. However, depending on the duration and impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on local and global supply chains, the Company's suppliers could be adversely impacted, which may result in delays or disruptions in the Company's current or future supply chain. The ongoing rollout of vaccines and a decreasing trend in new cases domestically is driving optimism for economic recovery, and specific to the Company's business operations, availability of clinical trial sites and patients to enroll in the ongoing clinical trials of LB1148. The Company will continue to actively evaluate the impact of the pandemic on its business operations and plans, including but not limited to the impact on access to capital, planned and ongoing clinical trials, cash management and its investment policies regarding cash as well as the long-term effects in the medical and drug development fields.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021

The following table summarizes the Company's results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Change
	2022			2021			$			%
Operating expenses
Research and development	$	959		$	692			267			39	%
General and administrative		2,929			1,262			1,667			132	%
Total operating expenses		3,888			1,954			1,934			99	%
Loss from operations		(3,888	)		(1,954	)		(1,934	)		99	%
Other income (expense):
Gain on forgiveness of PPP loan		—			279			(279	)	n/a
Loss on issuance of secured debt		—			(686	)		686		n/a
Gain on change in fair value of warrant liability		793			42			751			1788	%
Interest expense		(1	)		(1,711	)		1,710		n/a
Other income		1			—			1		n/a
Loss on issuance of warrants		(1,110	)		—			(1,110	)	n/a
Total other expense		(317	)		(2,076	)		1,759			85	%
Net loss	$	(4,205	)	$	(4,030	)	$	(175	)		(4	)%

Research and Development Expenses

The increase in research and development expenses of approximately $0.3 million, or 39%, from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 to $1.0 million for three months ended March 31, 2022 was primarily attributable to the Company's increased clinical trial activities in the first quarter of 2022, compared to the same quarter last year. In the first quarter of 2022, the Company's clinical trial activities, which had been virtually halted in the first quarter of 2021 due to the COVD-19 pandemic, continued to increase as the Company proceeded with its phase 2 study of the prevention of post-surgical abdominal adhesions and advanced towards its phase 3 postoperative return of bowel function study for which a protocol has been agreed to with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Clinical research costs were $0.1 million higher for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021, and regulatory costs were higher by $0.2 million concurrent with the Company's efforts to receive phase 3 clearance for its postoperative return of bowel function study. Also contributing to the increase was higher drug manufacturing-related costs of $0.1 million, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to increase production of LB1148 in advance of the administration of the drug during upcoming clinical trials. Partially offsetting the increases in research and development expenses was a net decrease of $0.1 million in employee and contract labor costs. Although employee headcount and contract labor costs were higher for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2021, the increase was more than offset by a decrease in separation-related costs recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2021 associated with Company’s former Chief Development Officer, who was terminated in February 2021.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2022 increased approximately $1.7 million or 132%, from $1.3 million for three months ended March 31, 2021 to $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022. The increase was primarily related to higher general and administrative expenses associated with operating as a public company, as compared to those of our accounting predecessor, LBS, including (i) a $0.6 million increase in accounting and legal costs associated with regulatory, compliance and governance fees required since the Merger, (ii) a $0.3 million increase in insurance costs associated with being a public company, (iii) $0.3 million net increase in net payroll and employee related costs coinciding with the increased staffing needs after becoming a public company and expected staffing needs in line with the Company's strategy and operating plan, and (iv) a $0.2 million increase in investor relations and shareholder services costs. The remaining increase in the first quarter of 2022 compared to the first quarter of 2021 was due to an increase in recruiting fees, professional conference fees, and licensing fees.

Other income (expense)

Other expense, net decreased by $1.8 million to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 from $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest expense as the prior year period included a $1.6 non-cash interest charge associated with a debt discount on pre-Merger debt. Also included in the three months ended March 31, 2021 was

a $0.7 million non-cash loss recorded on the issuance of secured debt in connection with the discount given for the pre-Merger senior secured debt, partially offset by the $0.3 million gain on the forgiveness of the Company's Paycheck Protection Program loan. The three months ended March 31, 2022 includes a $0.8 million non-cash gain associated with the revaluation of liability-classified warrants in the period, which was more than offset by a $1.1 million non-cash loss on the issuance of warrants. On January 31, 2022 (the "Effective Date"), the Company and Altium Growth Fund, L.P. (the "Investor") entered into an agreement to irrevocably waive any adjustment to the exercise price of the certain warrants held by the Investor from and after the Effective Date for the Company's issuances of equity or equity-linked securities at a price below the exercise price of the related warrants (the January 2022 Waiver Agreement") (see Note 6 to the notes the financial statements). As consideration for this waiver, pursuant to the January 2022 Waiver Agreement, the Company issued the Investor the 2,250,000 warrants (the "January 2022 Warrants"). The January 2022 Warrants are exercisable beginning six months following the Effective Date. The exercise price for the January 2022 Warrants is $1.10 (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 28, 2022). The $1.1 million non-cash loss on the issuance of the January 2022 Warrants represents the fair value of the warrants on the date of issuance, January 31, 2022.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Financial Condition

Since the Company's inception, it has financed its operations through the sales of its securities, issuance of long-term debt, the exercise of investor warrants, and to a lesser degree grants and research contracts as well as the licensing of its intellectual property to third parties. Refer to the paragraph under the heading "Going Concern" in the Results of Operations section above for management's assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Sources of Liquidity

Management expects the Company to incur substantial operating losses for the foreseeable future in order to complete clinical trials and launch and commercialize any product candidates for which it may receive regulatory approval. The Company will need to raise additional capital through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, and other similar arrangements. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by general political, economic conditions or a resurgence of COVID-19, COVID-19 variants, or another pandemic. In the event the Company is unable to access additional capital, it may need to curtail or greatly reduce its operations, which could have an adverse impact on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.

On May 6, 2022, the Company entered into definitive agreements with several institutional and accredited investors for the purchase and sale in a registered direct offering of 3,646,690 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $0.55 per share. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the financing for working capital and general corporate purposes, including the development of the Company’s lead product candidate LB1148.

The shares of common stock (but not the warrants or the shares of common stock underlying such warrants) offered in the registered direct offering are being offered and sold by the Company pursuant to a "shelf" registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-263705), including a base prospectus, previously filed with and declared effective by the SEC on April 26, 2022.

Cash Flows

As of March 31, 2022, the Company had $6.7 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. The following table shows a summary of the Company's cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2022			2021
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(3,764	)	$	(1,250	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(87	)	$	1,152

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022, reflects a $4.3 million loss for the year adjusted for $0.3 million of net cash outflows related to changes in operating assets and liabilities, and certain non-cash items including: (i) a $1.1 million

loss recognized from the issuance of the January 2022 Warrants, (ii) a $0.8 million gain recognized for the change in the fair market value of the warrant liabilities in the period, and (iii) a $0.4 million expense recognized for stock-based compensation.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, cash used in financing activities of less than $0.1 million was attributable to the payoff of the Company's insurance financing arrangement in the first quarter of 2022. The Company again entered into an insurance financing arrangement during the second quarter of 2022 to finance an insurance policy which the Company renewed in April 2022. The amount financed through the new arrangement is approximately $0.8 million at a stated interest rate of 3.82% and is payable over a 9-month period commencing with the first payment on May 27, 2022. The financing arrangement is secured by the associated insurance policy.

Future Liquidity and Needs

The Company has incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. To date, the Company has not been able to generate significant revenues nor achieve operating profitability. The Company plans to fund its current operating needs using cash on hand. The Company’s available cash as of the date of this filing will not be sufficient to fund its anticipated level of operations for the next 12 months and the Company will require additional financing during the second half of 2022 to continue at its expected level of operations. If the Company fails to obtain the needed capital, it will be forced to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of its development activities or perhaps cease operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are not required to provide the information required by this item as we are considered a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule ~~12b-15~~229.10(f)(1).

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act, ~~of 1934, as amended, this Amendment contains new certifications by~~that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the ~~Company’s~~reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, ~~which are~~to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2022. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as a result of the material weakness that existed in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Fair Value Calculations

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that a reasonable possibility exists that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As of March 31, 2022, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of March 31, 2022, a material weakness existed in our internal control over financial reporting due to a lack of controls in the financial closing and reporting process, including a lack of segregation of duties and the documentation and design of formalized processes and procedures surrounding the creation and posting of journal entries and account reconciliations. This material weakness contributed to a material weakness in our control activities based on the criteria set forth in the 2013 Framework. If not remediated, or if the Company identifies further material weaknesses in its internal controls, the Company’s failure to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in its consolidated financial statements and a failure to meet its reporting and financial obligations.

The Company’s management had identified an additional material weakness in its internal control over the fair value calculation of options granted during the quarter ended June 30, 2021. This material weakness resulted in a material audit adjustment being ~~filed~~made to our consolidated financial statements as ~~exhibits~~of and for the period ended June 30, 2021.

Remediation Efforts related to the ~~Amendment. Because~~Material Weakness

Management, with oversight from the ~~Amendment includes~~Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, is actively engaged in remediation efforts to address the material weaknesses identified in the management’s evaluation of internal controls and procedures. The remediation efforts summarized below, which have been or are in the process of being implemented, are intended to address the identified material weaknesses.

(i)

The Company will continue to hire additional finance, accounting and information technology employees with appropriate experience, certification, education and training.

(ii)

The Company has already implemented, or is in the process of implementing, compensating controls to remediate the inherent segregation of duties control risks associated with its current accounting software. In addition, the Company plans to implement a new accounting and finance management software in 2022, which is intended to eliminate some of the existing deficiencies in our internal control environment. Both the compensating controls implemented and those information technology general controls implemented with the new accounting and finance management software will be documented and tested for operating effectiveness in 2022.

(iii)

The Company is in the process of updating our formal accounting policies, procedures and controls, including preparation and review of account reconciliations, review of journal entries, and controls over period end financial reporting.

(iv)

The Company is developing a comprehensive plan to identify and remediate all segregation of duties deficiencies in its current control environment in 2022.

(v)

The Company engaged a third-party service provider to complete an independent risk assessment of its internal control over financial reporting to evaluate sources of potential risks to its consolidated financial statements. As a result of this risk assessment, the Company plans to identify and design key controls across several processes supporting internal control over financial reporting and develop a workplan for remediation of the enhancements identified.

(vi)

The Company is in the process of implementing additional key internal controls designed to address the potential risks identified in its key business processes.

(vii)

The Company engaged a third-party service provider to assist with the development, implementation and testing of its internal control environment.

The Company believes that the implementation of the above steps will allow it to make progress on addressing a number of the deficient controls within its internal control environment, which will help facilitate the remediation of the material weakness identified above. As the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over financial reporting, it will take additional measures to address control deficiencies, or it may modify certain of the remediation measures described above. However, the Company requires additional time to complete the design and implementation of its remediation plans and demonstrate the operating effectiveness of our remediation efforts. The material weaknesses cannot be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than in connection with implementing a plan to remediate the material weakness described above, there were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial ~~statements,~~reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the quarter ended March 31, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

We face many risks and uncertainties, as more fully described in this Quarterly on Form 10-Q under the heading “Risk Factors.” Some of these risks and uncertainties are summarized below. The summary below does not contain all of the information that may be important to you, and you should read this summary together with the more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties contained in “Risk Factors.”.

•

The Company’s business depends on the successful clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization of the Company's lead drug candidate, LB1148.

•

Some of the initial indications in which the Company plans to pursue development of LB1148 are indications for which there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies. This makes it difficult to predict the timing and costs of clinical development for LB1148 in these indications, as well as the regulatory approval path.

•

The development and commercialization strategy for the Company’s product candidate LB1148 depends, in part, on published scientific literature and prior findings of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regarding the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid. If the Company is not able to pursue this strategy, it may be delayed in receiving regulatory authority approval.

•

Clinical drug development is very expensive, time-consuming, and uncertain.

•

The results of previous clinical trials may not be predictive of future results, and the results of the Company’s current and planned clinical trials may not satisfy the requirements of the FDA or non-U.S. regulatory authorities.

•

Even if the Company receives marketing approval for LB1148, or any future product candidate, it may not be able to successfully commercialize its product candidates due to unfavorable pricing regulations or third-party coverage and reimbursement policies, which could make it difficult for the Company to sell its product candidates profitably.

•

The Company’s product candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other unexpected properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of an approved label, or result in post-approval regulatory action.

•

The Company may in the future conduct clinical trials for its product candidates outside the United States, and the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such trials or the data may be insufficient to achieve regulatory approvals.

•

The Company expects to rely on third-party Contract Research Organizations ("CROs") and other third parties to conduct and oversee its clinical trials. If these third parties do not meet the Company’s requirements or otherwise conduct the trials as required, the Company may not be able to satisfy its contractual obligations or obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, its product candidates.

•

The Company will need to raise additional financing in the future to fund its operations, which may not be available to it on favorable terms or at all.

•

The Company currently has no products approved for sale, and it may never obtain regulatory approval to commercialize any of its product candidate.

•

The Company’s or third party’s clinical trials may fail to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of its product candidates, or serious adverse or unacceptable side effects may be identified during their development, which could prevent or delay marketing approval and commercialization, increase the Company’s costs or necessitate the abandonment or limitation of the development of the product candidate.

•

The Company has expressed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

•

The Company’s product candidates, if approved, will face significant competition and their failure to compete effectively may prevent them from achieving significant market penetration.

•

Any adverse developments that occur during any clinical trials conducted by Newsoara Biopharma Co., Ltd. (“Newsoara”) may affect the Company’s ability to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize LB1148.

•

The Company has a very limited operating history and has never generated any revenues from product sales.

•

If the Company is not able to comply with the applicable continued listing requirements or standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq could delist its common stock.

•

The Company may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights throughout the world.

•

The Company's board of directors (the “Board”) has broad discretion to issue additional securities, which might dilute the net tangible book value per share of our common stock for existing stockholders.

•

The Company currently has no marketing capabilities and no sales organization. If the Company is unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities on its own or through third parties, the Company will be unable to successfully commercialize its product candidates, if approved, or generate product revenue.

•

Failure to remediate a material weakness in internal accounting controls could result in material misstatements in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

•

The Company may not be able to obtain, maintain or enforce global patent rights or other intellectual property rights that cover its product candidates and technologies that are of sufficient breadth to prevent third parties from competing against the Company.

•

Obtaining and maintaining the Company’s patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment, and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and its patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

•

If the Company fails to comply with its obligations under its intellectual property license agreements, it could lose license rights that are important to its business. Additionally, these agreements may be subject to disagreement over contract interpretation, which could narrow the scope of its rights to the relevant intellectual property or technology or increase its financial or other obligations to its licensors.

•

The Company’s business could be adversely affected by the effects of health pandemics or epidemics, including ~~certifications~~the recent COVID-19 pandemic, especially where overwhelming patient hospitalizations disrupt routine medical practices, clinical studies, and ability for appropriate follow-up of patients enrolled in clinical studies or supply chain constraints associated with such pandemics impact the availability of the components needed to manufacture LB1148.

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. We have described below a number of uncertainties and risks which, in addition to uncertainties and risks presented elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. The uncertainties and risks enumerated below as well as those presented elsewhere in this Quarterly Report should be considered carefully when evaluating our Company, business and the value of our securities. We have marked with an asterisk (*) those risk factors, if any, that reflect changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Risks Related to the Company’s Development, Commercialization and Regulatory Approval of the Company’s Investigational Therapies

The Company’s business depends on the successful clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization of LB1148.

The success of the Company’s business, including its ability to finance itself and generate revenue in the future, primarily depends on the successful development, regulatory approval and commercialization of LB1148. The clinical and commercial success of LB1148 depends on a number of factors, including the following:

•

timely and successful completion of required clinical trials not yet initiated, which may be significantly slower or costlier than the Company currently anticipates and/or produce results that do not achieve the endpoints of the trials;

•

whether the Company is required by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory agencies to conduct additional studies beyond those planned to support the approval and commercialization of LB1148;

•

submission and approval of regulatory filings by the FDA for LB1148;

•

achieving and maintaining, and, where applicable, ensuring that the Company’s third-party contractors achieve and maintain compliance with their contractual obligations and with all regulatory requirements applicable to LB1148;

•

ability of third parties with whom the Company contracts to manufacture adequate clinical trial and commercial supplies of LB1148, to remain in good standing with regulatory agencies and to develop, validate and maintain commercially viable manufacturing processes that are compliant with current good manufacturing practices (“cGMP”);

•

a continued acceptable safety profile during clinical development and following approval of LB1148;

•

ability to obtain favorable labeling for LB1148 through regulators that allows for successful commercialization, given that the drugs may be marketed only to the extent approved by these regulatory authorities;

•

ability to successfully commercialize LB1148 in the U.S. and internationally, if approved for marketing, sale and distribution in such countries and territories, whether alone or in collaboration others;

•

acceptance by physicians, insurers and payors, and patients of the quality, benefits, safety and efficacy of LB1148, if approved, including relative to alternative and competing treatments;

•

existence of a regulatory environment conducive to the success of LB1148;

•

ability to price LB1148 to recover the Company’s development costs and generate a satisfactory profit margin; and

•

The Company’s ability and its partners’ ability to establish and enforce intellectual property rights in and to LB1148.

If the Company, either individually or through its co-development partner, does not achieve one or more of these factors, many of which are beyond its control, in a timely manner or at all, the Company could experience significant delays or an inability to obtain regulatory approvals or commercialize LB1148. Even if regulatory approvals are obtained, the Company may never be able to successfully commercialize LB1148. Accordingly, the Company cannot assure you that it will ever be able to generate sufficient revenue through the sale of LB1148, if approved, to continue its business.

Some of the initial indications in which the Company plans to pursue development of LB1148 are indications for which there are no FDA-approved therapies. This makes it difficult to predict the timing and costs of clinical development for LB1148 in these indications, as well as the regulatory approval path.

There are no FDA-approved therapies for decreasing the time to normal feedings and bowel movement (or preventing necrotizing enterocolitis) in infants after heart surgery. While ENTEREG® is approved to accelerate the time to upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery following surgeries that include partial bowel resection with primary anastomosis, there is no guarantee that regulatory precedence regarding ENTEREG® will apply to the approval of other therapies that may accelerate the time to gastrointestinal recovery following surgery. While there are multiple medical devices approved for the reduction or elimination of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions, there are no drugs approved to reduce postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as LB1148 can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known or extensively studied therapeutic approaches.

The development and commercialization strategy for the Company’s lead product candidate LB1148 depends, in part, on published scientific literature and the FDA’s prior findings regarding the safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid. If the Company is not able to pursue this strategy, it may be delayed in receiving regulatory authority approval.

The Hatch-Waxman Act added Section 505(b)(2) to the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). Section 505(b)(2) permits the submission of a New Drug Application ("NDA") where at least some of the information required for approval comes from investigations that were not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference or use from the person by or for whom the investigations were conducted. The FDA interprets Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA, for purposes of approving an NDA, to permit the applicant to rely, in part, upon published literature and/or the FDA’s previous findings of safety and efficacy for an approved product. The FDA also requires companies to perform additional clinical trials or measurements to support any deviation from the previously approved product and to justify that it is scientifically appropriate to rely on the applicable published literature or referenced product, referred to as bridging. The FDA may then approve the new product candidate for all or some of the indications for which the referenced product has been approved, as well as for any new indication sought by the Section 505(b)(2) applicant, if such approval is supported by study data. The labeling, however, may be required to include all or some of the limitations, contraindications, warnings or precautions or restrictions on use included in the reference product’s labeling, including a boxed warning, or may require additional limitations, contraindications, warnings or precautions or restrictions on use.

The Company currently plans to pursue marketing approval for LB1148, in the U.S. through a 505(b)(2) NDA and will be completing bridging analyses prior to NDA submissions. If the FDA disagrees with the Company’s conclusions regarding the appropriateness of its reliance on the FDA’s prior findings of safety and efficacy for TXA or on published literature, or if the Company is not otherwise able to bridge to the listed drug or published literature to demonstrate that its reliance is scientifically appropriate, the Company could be required to conduct additional clinical trials or other studies to support its NDA, which could lead to unanticipated costs and delays or to the termination of the development program for LB1148. If the Company is unable to obtain approval for LB1148 through the 505(b)(2) NDA process, it may be required to pursue the more expensive and time consuming 505(b)(1) approval process, which consists of full reports of investigations of safety and effectiveness conducted by or for the Company.

Notwithstanding the approval of a number of products by the FDA under Section 505(b)(2), pharmaceutical companies and others have objected to the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA’s interpretation of Section 505(b)(2) is successfully challenged, the FDA may be required to change its policies and practices with respect to Section 505(b)(2) regulatory approvals, which could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA that the Company submits pursuant to the 505(b)(2) process. Even if the Company is allowed to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway to FDA approval, it cannot assure you that its product candidates will receive the requisite approvals for commercialization.

The Company may find it difficult to enroll patients in its clinical trials, which could delay or prevent it from proceeding with clinical trials of its product candidates.

Identifying and qualifying subjects to participate in clinical trials of the Company’s product candidates is critical to its success. The timing of clinical trials depends on the Company’s ability to recruit subjects to participate, as well as the completion of required follow-up periods. Patients may be unwilling to participate in clinical trials because of negative publicity from adverse events related to the biotechnology or pharmaceutical fields, competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, the existence of current treatments or for other reasons. The timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining regulatory approval of the Company’s product candidates may be delayed, which could result in increased costs, delays in advancing its product candidates, delays in testing the effectiveness of its product candidates or termination of the clinical trials altogether.

Patient enrollment and trial completion are affected by numerous additional factors, including the:

•

process for identifying patients;

•

design of the trial protocol;

•

eligibility and exclusion criteria;

•

perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;

•

availability of competing therapies and clinical trials;

•

severity of the disease under investigation;

•

proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients;

•

ability to obtain and maintain patient consent;

•

risk that enrolled patients will drop out before completion of the trial;

•

patient referral practices of physicians; and

•

ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment.

If the Company has difficulty enrolling a sufficient number of patients to conduct its clinical trials as planned, it may need to delay, limit or terminate ongoing or planned clinical trials, any of which would have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Clinical drug development is very expensive, time-consuming and uncertain.

Clinical development for the Company’s product candidates is very expensive, time-consuming, difficult to design and implement, and the outcomes are inherently uncertain. Most product candidates that commence clinical trials are never approved by regulatory authorities for commercialization and of those that are approved many do not cover their costs of development. In addition, the Company, any partner with which it may in the future collaborate, the FDA, an institutional review board (“IRB”), or other regulatory authorities,

including state and local agencies and counterpart agencies in foreign countries, may suspend, delay, require modifications to or terminate the Company’s clinical trials at any time.

The results from the prior preclinical studies and clinical trials for LB1148 discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may not necessarily be predictive of the results of future preclinical studies or clinical trials. Even if the Company is able to complete its planned clinical trials of its product candidates according to its current development timelines, the results from its prior clinical trials of its product candidates may not be replicated in these future trials. Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries (including those with greater resources and experience than the Company) have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials after achieving positive results in early stage development, and the Company cannot be certain that it will not face similar setbacks. These setbacks have been caused by, among other things, preclinical findings made while clinical trials were underway or safety or efficacy observations made in clinical trials, including previously unreported adverse events. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials nonetheless have failed to obtain FDA approval. If the Company fails to produce positive results in its clinical trials of any of its product candidates, the development timelines, regulatory approvals, and commercialization prospects for its product candidates, as well as the Company’s business and financial prospects, would be adversely affected. Further, the Company’s product candidates may not be approved even if they achieve their respective primary endpoints in Phase 3 registration trials. The FDA or non-U.S. regulatory authorities may disagree with the Company’s trial designs or its interpretation of data from preclinical studies and clinical trials. The Company has taken the position that LB1148 has a single active ingredient, TXA. LB1148 also contains polyethylene glycol 3350 (“PEG”). Across different countries and different circumstances, PEG may be regulated as an inactive ingredient, a medical device, or an active ingredient. There is uncertainty about (1) whether regulatory agencies will classify LB1148 as a fixed-combination drug product and (2) consequential implications of, for example, FDA’s fixed-combination drug product regulation concerning the evaluation of each active drug component’s individual contribution to the overall treatment effect. The treatment of PEG and any regulatory requirements, if it is considered an active ingredient, may differ across regulatory authorities. If LB1148 is considered a fixed-combination drug product, then this may impact the design and overall number of required clinical trials as well as additional requirements for nonclinical studies. Even though we are proceeding with a Phase 3 trial for LB1148 as a single active ingredient drug product, we may be required to conduct additional trials, which could include the use of a factorial design, and nonclinical studies if, for example, FDA (1) concludes that PEG is an active ingredient in LB1148 and (2) is unwilling to provide a waiver from meeting their fixed-combination drug product regulation/requirements. In addition, any of these regulatory authorities may change requirements for the approval of a product candidate even after reviewing and providing comments or advice on a protocol for a pivotal clinical trial that has the potential to result in approval by the FDA or another regulatory authority. Furthermore, any of these regulatory authorities may also approve the Company’s product candidate for fewer or more limited indications than it requests or may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials.

If the clinical development of LB1148 is successful, the Company intends to eventually seek regulatory approvals of LB1148 initially in the U.S. and may seek approvals in other geographies. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate for any target indication, the Company must demonstrate with substantial evidence gathered in preclinical studies and adequate and well-controlled clinical studies, and, with respect to approval in the United States, to the satisfaction of the FDA, that the product candidate is safe and effective for use for that target indication. The Company cannot assure you that the FDA or non-U.S. regulatory authorities would consider its planned clinical trials to be sufficient to serve as the basis for approval of its product candidates for any indication. The FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities retain broad discretion in evaluating the results of the Company’s clinical trials and in determining whether the results demonstrate that its product candidates are safe and effective. If the Company is required to conduct clinical trials of its product candidates in addition to those it has planned prior to approval, the Company will need substantial additional funds, and cannot assure you that the results of any such outcomes trial or other clinical trials will be sufficient for approval.

Unforeseen side effects from LB1148 could arise either during clinical development or, if approved, after it has been marketed. Undesirable side effects could cause the Company, any partners with which the Company may collaborate, or regulatory authorities to interrupt, extend, modify, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive or narrower label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or comparable foreign authorities.

Results of clinical trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects. In such an event, trials could be suspended or terminated, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of a product candidate for any or all targeted indications. The drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or

the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

Additionally, if the Company or others identify undesirable side effects, or other previously unknown problems, caused by a product after obtaining U.S. or foreign regulatory approval, a number of potentially negative consequences could result, which could prevent the Company or its potential partners from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the product and could substantially increase the costs of commercializing such product.

The Company, as well as investigator sponsors, have conducted clinical trials, is conducting clinical trials, and may in the future choose to conduct one or more clinical trials outside of the U.S. Although the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority may accept data from clinical trials conducted outside the U.S. or the applicable jurisdiction, acceptance of such study data by the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or exclusion. Where data from foreign clinical trials are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless such data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; the studies were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence; and the data are considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar requirements. In addition, such foreign studies would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the studies are conducted. There can be no assurance the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable home country. If the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would likely result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of the Company’s business plan.

The Company relies on and expects to continue to rely on third-party CROs and other third parties to conduct and oversee its clinical trials. If these third parties do not meet the Company’s requirements or otherwise conduct the trials as required, the Company may not be able to satisfy its contractual obligations or obtain regulatory approval for, or commercialize, its product candidates.

The Company relies on, and expects to continue to rely on, third-party CROs to conduct and oversee its LB1148 clinical trials and other aspects of product development. The Company also expects to rely on various medical institutions, clinical investigators and contract laboratories to conduct its trials in accordance with the Company’s clinical protocols and all applicable regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s regulations and good clinical practice (“GCP”) requirements, which are an international standard meant to protect the rights and health of patients and to define the roles of clinical trial sponsors, administrators and monitors, and state regulations governing the handling, storage, security and recordkeeping for drug and biologic products. These CROs and other third parties are expected to play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data from the clinical trials. The Company expects to rely heavily on these parties for the execution of its clinical trials and preclinical studies and will control only certain aspects of their activities. The Company and its CROs and other third-party contractors will be required to comply with GCP and good laboratory practice (“GLP”) requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP and GLP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If the Company or any of these third parties fail to comply with applicable GCP and GLP requirements, or reveal noncompliance from an audit or inspection, the clinical data generated in the Company’s clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or other regulatory authorities may require the Company to perform additional clinical trials before approving the Company’s or the Company’s partners’ marketing applications. The Company cannot assure that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine whether or not any of the Company’s clinical or preclinical trials comply with applicable GCP and GLP requirements. In addition, the Company’s clinical trials generally must be conducted with product produced under cGMP regulations. The Company’s failure to comply with these regulations and policies may require it to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

If any of the Company’s CROs or clinical trial sites terminate their involvement in one of its clinical trials for any reason, it may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or clinical trial sites or do so on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, if the Company’s relationship with clinical trial sites is terminated, it may experience the loss of follow-up information on patients enrolled in its ongoing clinical trials unless the Company is able to transfer the care of those patients to another qualified clinical trial site. In addition, principal investigators for the Company’s clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to it from time to time and could receive cash or equity compensation in connection with such services. If these relationships and any related compensation result in perceived or actual conflicts of interest, the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site may be questioned by the FDA.

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a product from a government or other third-party payor is a time consuming and costly process that could require the Company to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost effectiveness data to the payor. There may be significant delays in obtaining such coverage and reimbursement for newly approved products, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the product is approved by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Moreover, eligibility for coverage and reimbursement does not imply that a product will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers costs, including research, development, intellectual property, manufacture, sale and distribution expenses. Interim reimbursement levels for new products, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover costs and may not be made permanent. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the product and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost products and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices for products may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors, by any future laws limiting drug prices and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of product from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States.

There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting reimbursement policies, but also have their own methods and approval process apart from Medicare coverage and reimbursement determinations.

Coverage and reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payor’s determination that use of a product is:

•

a covered benefit under its health plan;

•

safe, effective and medically necessary;

•

appropriate for the specific patient;

•

cost-effective; and

•

neither experimental nor investigational.

The Company cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any product that it commercializes and, if coverage and reimbursement are available, what the level of reimbursement will be. The Company’s inability to promptly obtain coverage and adequate reimbursement rates from both government-funded and private payors for any approved products that the Company develops could have a material adverse effect on its operating results, its ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and its overall financial condition.

Reimbursement may impact the demand for, and the price of, any product for which the Company obtains marketing approval. Assuming the Company obtains coverage for a given product by a third-party payor, the resulting reimbursement payment rates may not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. Patients who are prescribed medications for the treatment of their conditions, and their prescribing physicians, generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with those medications. Patients are unlikely to use the Company’s products unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to cover all or a significant portion of the cost of the Company’s products. Therefore, coverage and adequate reimbursement is critical to new product acceptance. Coverage decisions may depend upon clinical and economic standards that disfavor new products when more established or lower cost therapeutic alternatives are already available or subsequently become available. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which the Company receives regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

The Company’s expects to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of any of its product candidates due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations, and additional legislative changes. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription medicines, medical devices and surgical procedures and other treatments, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the successful commercialization of new products. Further, the adoption and implementation of any future governmental cost containment or other health reform initiative may result in additional downward pressure on the price that the Company may receive for any approved product.

Outside of the U.S., many countries require approval of the sale price of a product before it can be marketed and the pricing review period only begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval in some of

these countries, the Company may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of its product candidate to other available therapies. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, the Company might obtain marketing approval for a product candidate in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay its commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, and negatively impact the revenues, if any, the Company is able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder the Company’s ability to recoup its investment in one or more product candidates, even if such product candidates obtain marketing approval.

Even if a product candidate obtains regulatory approval, it may fail to achieve the broad degree of physician and patient adoption and use necessary for commercial success.

The commercial success of LB1148, if approved, will depend significantly on attaining broad adoption and use of the drug by physicians and patients for approved indications, and it may not be commercially successful even though it is shown to be effective. The degree and rate of physician and patient adoption of a product, if approved, will depend on a number of factors, including but not limited to:

•

patient demand for approved products that treat the indication for which they are approved;

•

the effectiveness of a product compared to other available therapies or treatment regimens;

•

the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from managed care plans and other healthcare payors;

•

the cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments and willingness to pay on the part of patients;

•

insurers’ willingness to see the applicable indication as a disease worth treating;

•

proper administration by physicians or patients;

•

patient satisfaction with the results, administration and overall treatment experience;

•

limitations or contraindications, warnings, precautions or approved indications for use different than those sought by the Company that are contained in the final FDA-approved labeling for the applicable product;

•

any FDA requirement to undertake a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy;

•

the effectiveness of the Company’s sales, marketing, pricing, reimbursement and access, government affairs, and distribution efforts;

•

adverse publicity about a product or favorable publicity about competitive products;

•

new government regulations and programs, including price controls and/or limits or prohibitions on ways to commercialize drugs, such as increased scrutiny on direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals; and

•

potential product liability claims or other product-related litigation.

If LB1148 is approved for use but fails to achieve the broad degree of physician and patient adoption necessary for commercial success, the Company’s operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected, which may delay, prevent or limit its ability to generate revenue and continue its business.

The Company’s product candidates, if approved, will face significant competition and their failure to compete effectively may prevent them from achieving significant market penetration.

The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition, less effective patent terms, and a strong emphasis on developing newer, fast-to-market proprietary therapeutics. Numerous companies are engaged in the development, patenting, manufacturing and marketing of healthcare products competitive with those that the Company is developing, including LB1148. The Company will face competition from a number of sources, such as pharmaceutical companies, generic drug companies, biotechnology companies, medical device companies and academic and research institutions, many of which have greater financial resources, marketing capabilities, sales forces, manufacturing capabilities, research and development capabilities, regulatory expertise, clinical trial expertise, intellectual property portfolios, more international reach, experience in obtaining patents and regulatory approvals for product candidates and other resources than the Company. Some of the companies that offer competing products also have a broad range of other product offerings, large direct sales forces and long-term customer relationships with the Company’s target physicians, which could inhibit the Company’s market penetration efforts.

With respect to the Company’s lead product candidate, LB1148, for the indication of postoperative improvement of bowel function, the Company expects to face competition in the pharmacological therapy space from alvimopan, marketed as a branded product, ENTEREG®, by Merck, as well as in generic form. There are no pharmacotherapies for decreasing the time to normal feedings and bowel movement (or preventing necrotizing enterocolitis) in infants after heart surgery or for the reduction or elimination of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. However, the Company will face general competition from other medical interventions, namely surgical procedures and adhesion barrier products. Adhesion barrier products approved for abdominal or pelvic surgery in the United States consist of SEPRAFILM, INTERCEED and ADEPT. In addition, several products are used off-label for adhesion prevention in the United States, including EVICEL, SURGIWRAP, COSEAL and PRECLUDE. Adhesion barrier products available outside the United States include HYALOBARRIER, SPRAYSHIELD, PREVADH, and INTERCOAT. Such products are used as adjunctive interventions, have variable efficacy, and are not easily used with laparoscopic procedures, which are becoming increasingly common.

Any adverse developments that occur during any clinical trials conducted by Newsoara may affect the Company’s ability to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize LB1148.

Newsoara has the rights to develop and commercialize LB1148 in China for return of bowel function, reduction of adhesions, and sepsis. If serious adverse events occur during any clinical trials for which Newsoara conducts with respect to LB1148, the FDA and other regulatory authorities may delay, limit or deny approval of LB1148 or require the Company to conduct additional clinical trials as a condition to marketing approval, which would increase our costs. If the Company receives FDA approval for LB1148 and a new and serious safety issue is identified in connection with clinical trials conducted by Newsoara, the FDA and other regulatory authorities may withdraw their approval of the product or otherwise restrict the Company’s ability to market and sell the Company’s product. In addition, treating physicians may be less willing to administer the Company’s product due to concerns over such adverse events, which would limit the Company’s ability to commercialize LB1148.

Risks Related to the Company’s Business

The Company has a very limited operating history and has never generated any revenues from product sales.

The Company is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a very limited operating history that may make it difficult to evaluate the success of its business to date and to assess its future viability. The Company was initially formed in 2001 and its operations, to date, have been limited to business planning, raising capital, developing the Company’s pipeline assets and other research and development. The Company has not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete any clinical trials and has never completed the development of any product candidate, nor has it ever generated any revenue from product sales or otherwise. Consequently, the Company has no meaningful operations upon which to evaluate its business, and predictions about its future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if it had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical products.

The Company currently has no products approved for sale, and it may never obtain regulatory approval to commercialize any of its product candidates.

The research, testing, manufacturing, safety surveillance, efficacy, quality control, recordkeeping, labeling, packaging, storage, approval, sale, marketing, distribution, import, export and reporting of safety and other post-market information related to its biopharmaceutical products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory authorities in the U.S. and in foreign countries, and such regulations differ from country to country and frequently are revised.

Even after the Company achieves U.S. regulatory approval for a product candidate, if any, the Company will be subject to continued regulatory review and compliance obligations. For example, with respect to the Company’s product candidates, the FDA may impose significant restrictions on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or on the conditions of approval. A product candidate’s approval may contain requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies and surveillance, including Phase 4 clinical trials, to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product. The Company also will be subject to ongoing FDA obligations and continued regulatory review with respect to, among other things, the manufacturing, processing, labeling, packaging, distribution, pharmacovigilance and adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the Company’s product candidates. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, continued compliance with cGMP requirements and with the FDA’s GCP requirements and GLP requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA for all of the Company’s product candidates in clinical and preclinical development, and for any clinical trials that it conducts post-approval, as well as continued compliance with the FDA’s laws governing commercialization of the approved product, including but not limited to the FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (“OPDP”) regulation of promotional activities, fraud and abuse, product sampling, scientific speaker engagements and activities, formulary interactions as well as interactions with healthcare practitioners. To the extent that a product candidate is approved for sale in other countries, the Company may be subject to

similar or more onerous (i.e., prohibition on direct-to-consumer advertising that does not exist in the U.S.) restrictions and requirements imposed by laws and government regulators in those countries.

In addition, manufacturers of drug and biologic products and their facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP regulations. If the Company or a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the manufacturing, processing, distribution or storage facility where, or processes by which, the product is made, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product or the Company, including requesting that the Company initiate a product recall, or requiring notice to physicians or the public, withdrawal of the product from the market, or suspension of manufacturing.

If the Company, its product candidates or the manufacturing facilities for its product candidates fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may:

•

impose restrictions on the sale, marketing or manufacturing of the products, amend, suspend or withdraw product approvals or revoke necessary licenses;

•

mandate modifications to promotional and other product-specific materials or require the Company to provide corrective information to healthcare practitioners or in its advertising;

•

require the Company or its partners to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due dates for specific actions, penalties for noncompliance and, in extreme cases, require an independent compliance monitor to oversee the Company’s activities;

•

issue warning letters, bring enforcement actions, initiate surprise inspections, issue show cause notices or untitled letters describing alleged violations, which may be publicly available;

•

commence criminal investigations and prosecutions;

•

impose injunctions, suspensions or revocations of necessary approvals or other licenses;

•

impose other civil or criminal penalties;

•

suspend any ongoing clinical trials;

•

place restrictions on the kind of promotional activities that can be done;

•

delay or refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by the Company or its potential partners;

•

refuse to permit drugs or precursor chemicals to be imported or exported to or from the United States;

•

suspend or impose restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements; or

•

seize or detain products or require the Company or its partners to initiate a product recall.

The regulations, policies or guidance of the FDA and other applicable government agencies may change, and new or additional statutes or government regulations may be enacted, including at the state and local levels, which can differ by geography and could prevent or delay regulatory approval of the Company’s product candidates or further restrict or regulate post-approval activities. The Company cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse government regulations that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If the Company is not able to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance, it may not be permitted to commercialize its product candidates, which would adversely affect its ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability.

If the Company is not able to comply with the applicable continued listing requirements or standards of The Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq could delist its common stock.

The Company’s ability to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidity of its common stock could be adversely affected if is delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market or if it is unable to transfer its listing to another stock market. In order to maintain this listing, it must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing requirements and standards, including a requirement to maintain a minimum bid price of the Company's common stock of $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days. The Company’s closing stock price has been below $1.00 per share since April 7, 2022.

The Company cannot assure you that, in the future, its securities will meet the continued listing requirements to be listed on Nasdaq. If the Company’s common stock is delisted by Nasdaq, it could lead to a number of negative implications, including an adverse effect on

the price of its common stock, increased volatility in its common stock, reduced liquidity in its common stock, a limited availability of market quotations for the Company’s common stock, the loss of federal preemption of state securities laws and greater difficulty in obtaining financing. In addition, delisting of the Company’s common stock could deter broker-dealers from making a market in or otherwise seeking or generating interest in its common stock, could result in a loss of current or future coverage by certain sell-side analysts and might deter certain institutions and persons from investing in the Company’s securities at all. Delisting could also cause a loss of confidence of the Company’s collaborators, vendors, suppliers and employees, which could harm its business and future prospects.

The Company currently has no marketing capabilities and no sales organization. To commercialize the Company’s product candidates, if approved, in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, the Company must build its marketing, sales, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and the Company may not be successful in doing so. Although the Company’s employees, consultants, contractors, and partners have experience in the marketing, sale and distribution of pharmaceutical products, and business development activities involving external alliances, from prior employment at other companies, the Company as a company has no prior experience in the marketing, sale and distribution of pharmaceutical products, and there are significant risks involved in building and managing a sales organization, including its ability to hire, retain and incentivize qualified individuals, generate sufficient sales leads, provide adequate training to sales and marketing personnel, and effectively manage a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team. Any failure or delay in the development of the Company’s internal sales, marketing, distribution and pricing/reimbursement/access capabilities would impact adversely the commercialization of these products.

The Company may face product liability exposure, and if successful claims are brought against it, the Company may incur substantial liability if its insurance coverage for those claims is inadequate.

The Company faces an inherent risk of product liability or similar causes of action as a result of the clinical testing of its product candidates and will face an even greater risk if the Company commercializes any products. This risk exists even if a product is approved for commercial sale by the FDA and manufactured in facilities licensed and regulated by the FDA or an applicable foreign regulatory authority and notwithstanding the Company complying with applicable laws on promotional activity. The Company’s products and product candidates are designed to affect important bodily functions and processes. Any side effects, manufacturing defects, misuse or abuse associated with the Company’s product candidates could result in injury to a patient or potentially even death. The Company cannot offer any assurance that it will not face product liability suits in the future, nor can it assure that its insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover its liability under any such cases.

In addition, a liability claim may be brought against the Company even if its product candidates merely appear to have caused an injury. Product liability claims may be brought against the Company by consumers, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling or otherwise coming into contact with its product candidates, among others, and under some circumstances even government agencies. If the Company cannot successfully defend itself against product liability or similar claims, it will incur substantial liabilities, reputational harm and possibly injunctions and punitive actions. In addition, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

•

withdrawal or delay of recruitment or decreased enrollment rates of clinical trial participants;

•

termination or increased government regulation of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs;

•

the inability to commercialize the Company’s product candidates;

•

decreased demand for the Company’s product candidates;

•

impairment of the Company’s business reputation;

•

product recall or withdrawal from the market or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions;

•

substantial costs of any related litigation or similar disputes;

•

distraction of management’s attention and other resources from the Company’s primary business;

•

significant delay in product launch;

•

substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants against the Company that may not be covered by insurance;

•

withdrawal of reimbursement or formulary inclusion; or

•

loss of revenue.

The Company intends to obtain product liability insurance coverage for its clinical trials. Large judgments have been awarded in class action or individual lawsuits based on drugs that had unanticipated side effects. The Company’s insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all of its product liability-related expenses or losses and may not cover it for any expenses or losses it may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, restrictive and narrow, and, in the future, the Company may not be able to maintain adequate insurance coverage at a reasonable cost, in sufficient amounts or upon adequate terms to protect it against losses due to product liability or other similar legal actions. The Company will need to increase its product liability coverage if any of its product candidates receive regulatory approval, which will be costly, and it may be unable to obtain this increased product liability insurance on commercially reasonable terms or at all and for all geographies in which the Company wishes to launch. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against the Company, if judgments exceed its insurance coverage, could decrease its cash and harm its business, financial condition, operating results and future prospects.

Our stockholders may not receive any payment on the CVRs and the CVRs may otherwise expire valueless. In addition, the tax treatment of CVRs is uncertain.

Although we sold our legacy assets related to NSI-189, sufficient proceeds were not received to require distribution of proceeds to our CVR holders as provided for in the CVR Agreement. The right of our stockholders to receive any future payment on or derive any value from the CVRs will be contingent upon: (i) our ability to sell or license certain legacy intellectual property within the time periods specified in the CVR Agreement and (ii) the consideration received for such intellectual property being greater than the amounts permitted to be retained or deducted by us pursuant to the CVR Agreement. If we are not able to sell or license such intellectual property within the prescribed time period, or the consideration received by us is not greater than the amounts permitted to be retained or deducted by us, no payments will be made under the CVRs, and the CVRs will expire valueless. Following the closing of the Merger, we do not have any contractual obligation to support the development of the legacy asset, NSI-566.

Furthermore, the CVRs are unsecured obligations of the Company and all payments under the CVRs, all other obligations under the CVR Agreement and the CVRs and any rights or claims relating thereto will be subordinated in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all current or future senior obligations of the Company. Finally, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is unclear. There is no legal authority directly addressing the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the receipt of, and payments on, the CVRs, and there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position that could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders of the CVRs.

The Company’s employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, other clinical trial staff, consultants, vendors, CROs and any partners with whom the Company may collaborate may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements.

The Company is exposed to the risk that its employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, other clinical trial staff, consultants, vendors, CROs and any partners with which the Company may collaborate may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these persons could include intentional, reckless, gross or negligent misconduct or unauthorized activity that violates: laws or regulations, including those laws requiring the reporting of true, complete and accurate information to the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities; manufacturing standards; federal, state and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws and data privacy; anticorruption laws, antikickback and Medicare/Medicaid rules, or laws that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data, books and records. If any such or similar actions are instituted against the Company and the Company is not successful in defending itself or asserting the Company’s rights, those actions could have a significant impact on the Company’s business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative and punitive penalties, damages, monetary fines, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, debarments, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, injunctions, and curtailment or cessation of the Company’s operations, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate the Company’s business and the Company’s operating results.

The Company may be subject to risks related to off-label use of its product candidates.

The FDA strictly regulates the advertising and promotion of drug products, and drug products may only be marketed or promoted for their FDA approved uses, consistent with the product’s approved labeling. Although physicians may prescribe legally available drugs for off-label uses, manufacturers may not market or promote such uses. Advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval in the United States will be heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the Department of Justice, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, state attorneys general, members of Congress and the public. Violations, including promotion of the Company’s products for unapproved or off-label uses, are subject to enforcement letters, inquiries and investigations,

and civil, criminal and/or administrative sanctions by the FDA. Additionally, advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval outside of the United States will be heavily scrutinized by relevant foreign regulatory authorities.

Even if the Company obtains regulatory approval for its product candidates, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require labeling changes or impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance.

In the U.S., engaging in impermissible promotion of the Company’s product candidates for off-label uses can also subject it to false claims litigation under federal and state statutes, which can lead to civil, criminal and/or administrative penalties and fines and agreements, such as a corporate integrity agreement, that materially restrict the manner in which the Company promotes or distributes its product candidates. If the Company does not lawfully promote its products, the Company may become subject to such litigation and, if it is not successful in defending against such actions, those actions could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and operating results and even result in having an independent compliance monitor assigned to audit the Company’s ongoing operations for a lengthy period of time.

Before obtaining marketing approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate, the Company must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive preclinical testing and clinical trials that such product candidate is both safe and effective for use in the applicable indication. Failures can occur at any stage of testing. Clinical trials often fail to demonstrate safety and are associated with side effects or have characteristics that are unexpected. Based on the safety profile seen in clinical testing, the Company may need to abandon development or limit development to more narrow uses in which the side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more tolerable from a risk-benefit perspective. The FDA or an IRB may also require that the Company suspend, discontinue, or limit clinical trials based on safety information. Such findings could further result in regulatory authorities failing to provide marketing authorization for the product candidate. Many pharmaceutical candidates that initially showed promise in early stage testing and which were efficacious have later been found to cause side effects that prevented further development of the drug candidate and, in extreme cases, the side effects were not seen until after the drug was marketed, causing regulators to remove the drug from the market post-approval.

The Company may expend its limited resources to pursue a particular indication and fail to capitalize on indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

Because the Company has limited financial and managerial resources, it is currently focusing only on development programs that it identifies for specific indications for its product candidates. As a result, the Company may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities for other indications, or with other potential product candidates that later prove to have greater commercial potential. The Company’s resource allocation decisions may cause it to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. The Company’s spending on current and future research and development programs for specific indications or future product candidates may not yield any commercially viable products. If the Company does not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a product candidate, it may not gain approval or achieve market acceptance of that candidate, and its business and financial results will be harmed.

The Company may choose to discontinue developing or commercializing any of its product candidates, or may choose to not commercialize product candidates in approved indications, at any time during development or after approval, which would reduce or eliminate its potential return on investment for those product candidates.

At any time, the Company may decide to discontinue the development of any of its product candidates for a variety of reasons, including the appearance of new technologies that make its product candidates obsolete, competition from a competing product or changes in or failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. If the Company terminates a program in which it has invested significant resources, the Company will not receive any return on its investment and it will have missed the opportunity to have allocated those resources to potentially more productive uses.

Healthcare reform measures could hinder or prevent the commercial success of the Company’s product candidates.

There have been executive, judicial, and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, “Affordable Care Act”). For example, the so-called “individual mandate” was repealed as part of tax reform legislation adopted in December 2017, such that the shared responsibility

payment for individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential coverage under section 5000A of the Code was eliminated beginning in 2019. On June 17, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Thus, the Affordable Care Act will remain in effect in its current form. Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the Affordable Care Act. It is possible that the Affordable Care Act will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how such challenges and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the Affordable Care Act and the Company's business.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the Affordable Care Act was enacted. These changes included aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, effective April 1, 2031, which, due to subsequent legislative amendments, including the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will stay in effect through 2030 unless additional Congressional action is taken. However, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") and other SARS-CoV-2 relief legislation have suspended the 2% Medicare sequester from May 1, 2020 through March 31, 2022. Under current legislation the actual reduction in Medicare payments will vary from 1% in 2022 to up to 3% in the final fiscal year of this sequester. These laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, which could have a material adverse effect on customers for the Company's drugs, if approved, and accordingly, the Company's financial operations. The Company expects that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for its product candidates if approved or additional pricing pressures.

Further, in the United States there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several Congressional inquiries, Presidential executive orders, and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug and biological product pricing, reduce the cost of prescription drugs and biological products under government payor programs and review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs. For example, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles. It is unclear whether these or similar policy initiatives will be implemented in the future. Congress is considering drug pricing as part of other reform initiatives.

There are also calls to ban all direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals, which would limit the Company’s ability to market its product candidates. The United States is in a minority of jurisdictions that allow this kind of advertising and its removal could limit the potential reach of a marketing campaign. Further, it is possible that additional governmental action is taken in response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The Company may also be subject to stricter healthcare laws, regulation and enforcement, and its failure to comply with those laws could adversely affect its business, operations and financial condition.

Certain federal and state healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse and patients’ rights are and will be applicable to the Company’s business. The Company is subject to regulation by both the federal government and the states in which it or its partners conduct business. The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect the Company’s ability to operate include: the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws; the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act; the federal physician sunshine requirements under the Affordable Care Act; the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as it applies to activities outside of the United States; and state law equivalents of many of the above federal laws.

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of the Company’s business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. In addition, healthcare reform legislation has strengthened these laws. For example, the Affordable Care Act, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and certain criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the Affordable Care Act provided that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act.

Achieving and sustaining compliance with these laws may prove costly. In addition, any action against the Company for violation of these laws, even if the Company successfully defends against it, could cause the Company to incur significant legal expenses and divert its management’s attention from the operation of its business and result in reputational damage. If the Company’s operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental laws or regulations that apply to the Company, it may be subject to significant penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, including punitive damages, fines, disgorgement, the exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, individual imprisonment or the curtailment or restructuring of its operations, and injunctions, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to operate its business and its financial results.

The Company’s inability to successfully to in-license, acquire, develop and market additional product candidates or approved products would impair its ability to grow its business.

The Company intends to in-license, acquire, develop and market additional products and product candidates. Because the Company’s internal research and development capabilities are limited, it may be dependent on pharmaceutical companies, academic or government scientists and other researchers to sell or license products or technology to it. The success of this strategy depends partly on the Company’s ability to identify and select promising pharmaceutical product candidates and products, negotiate licensing or acquisition agreements with their current owners, and finance these arrangements.

The process of proposing, negotiating and implementing a license or acquisition of a product candidate or approved product is lengthy and complex. Other companies, including some with substantially greater financial, marketing, sales and other resources, may compete with the Company for the license or acquisition of product candidates and approved products. The Company has limited resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third-party products, businesses and technologies and integrate them into its current infrastructure. Moreover, the Company may devote resources to potential acquisitions or licensing opportunities that are never completed, or the Company may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts. The Company may not be able to acquire the rights to additional product candidates on terms that it finds acceptable or at all.

Further, any product candidate that the Company acquires may require additional development efforts prior to commercial sale, including preclinical or clinical testing and approval by the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to risks of failure typical of pharmaceutical product development, including the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory authorities. In addition, the Company cannot provide assurance that any approved products that it acquires will be manufactured or sold profitably or achieve market acceptance.

The Company may seek to avail itself of mechanisms to expedite the development or approval for product candidates it may pursue in the future, such as Fast Track or breakthrough designation, but such mechanisms may not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process.

LB1148 has received Fast Track designation from the FDA for the treatment of postoperative GI dysfunction (which may present as feeding intolerance, ileus, necrotizing enterocolitis, etc.) associated with gut hypoperfusion injury in pediatric patients who underwent congenital heart disease repair surgery. In addition, the Company may seek Fast Track designation, breakthrough designation, or priority review for product candidates it may pursue in the future. For example, if a drug is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition and the drug demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug sponsor may apply for FDA Fast Track designation. However, the FDA has broad discretion with regard to these mechanisms, and even if the Company believes a particular product candidate is eligible for any such mechanism, it cannot guarantee that the FDA would decide to grant it. Even if it does obtain Fast Track or priority review designation or pursue an accelerated approval pathway, the Company may not experience a faster development process, review, or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. The FDA may withdraw a particular designation if it believes that the designation is no longer supported by data from the Company’s clinical development program.

The Company intends to seek breakthrough designation for LB1148 for the treatment of postoperative GI dysfunction associated with gut hypoperfusion injury in pediatric patients who undergo congenital heart disease repair surgery and for the treatment of postoperative GI dysfunction associated with major surgeries that risk disrupting the intestinal mucosal barrier. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. Designation as a breakthrough therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if the Company believes a product candidate meets the criteria for designation as a breakthrough therapy, the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such designation. The Company cannot be sure that its evaluation of a product candidate as qualifying for breakthrough therapy designation will meet the FDA’s requirements. In any event, the receipt of a breakthrough therapy designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review, or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more product candidates qualifies as a breakthrough

therapy, the FDA may later determine that the product candidate no longer meets the conditions for qualification or may determine that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened.

Risks Related to the Company’s Dependence on Third Parties

The Company expects to rely on collaborations with third parties for the successful development and commercialization of its product candidates.

The Company expects to rely upon the efforts of third parties for the successful development and commercialization of the Company’s current and future product candidates. The clinical and commercial success of the Company’s product candidates may depend upon maintaining successful relationships with third-party partners which are subject to a number of significant risks, including the following:

•

the Company’s partners’ ability to execute their responsibilities in a timely, cost-efficient and compliant manner;

•

reduced control over delivery and manufacturing schedules;

•

price increases and product reliability;

•

manufacturing deviations from internal or regulatory specifications;

•

quality incidents;

•

the failure of partners to perform their obligations for technical, market or other reasons;

•

misappropriation of the Company’s current or future product candidates; and

•

other risks in potentially meeting the Company’s current and future product commercialization schedule or satisfying the requirements of its end-users.

The Company cannot assure you that it will be able to establish or maintain third-party relationships in order to successfully develop and commercialize its product candidates.

The Company relies completely on third-party contractors to supply, manufacture and distribute clinical drug supplies for its product candidates, which may include sole-source suppliers and manufacturers; the Company intends to rely on third parties for commercial supply, manufacturing and distribution if any of its product candidates receives regulatory approval; and the Company expects to rely on third parties for supply, manufacturing and distribution of preclinical, clinical and commercial supplies of any future product candidates.

The Company does not currently have, nor does it plan to acquire, the infrastructure or capability to supply, store, manufacture or distribute preclinical, clinical or commercial quantities of drug substances or products. Additionally, the Company has not entered into a long-term commercial supply agreement to provide it with such drug substances or products. As a result, the Company’s ability to develop its product candidates is dependent, and the Company’s ability to supply its products commercially will depend, in part, on the Company’s ability to obtain the active pharmaceutical ingredients (“APIs”) and other substances and materials used in its product candidates successfully from third parties and to have finished products manufactured by third parties in accordance with regulatory requirements and in sufficient quantities for preclinical and clinical testing and commercialization. If the Company fails to develop and maintain supply and other technical relationships with these third parties, it may be unable to continue to develop or commercialize its products and product candidates.

The Company does not have direct control over whether or not its contract suppliers and manufacturers will maintain current pricing terms, be willing to continue supplying the Company with APIs and finished products or maintain adequate capacity and capabilities to serve its needs, including quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. The Company is dependent on its contract suppliers and manufacturers for day-to-day compliance with applicable laws and cGMPs for production of both APIs and finished products. If the safety or quality of any product or product candidate or component is compromised due to a failure to adhere to applicable laws or for other reasons, the Company may not be able to commercialize or obtain regulatory approval for the affected product or product candidate successfully, and the Company may be held liable for injuries sustained as a result.

In order to conduct larger or late-stage clinical trials for a product candidate and supply sufficient commercial quantities of the resulting drug product and its components, if that product candidate is approved for sale, the Company’s contract manufacturers and suppliers will need to produce its drug substances and product candidates in larger quantities more cost-effectively and, in certain cases, at higher yields than they currently achieve. If the Company’s third-party contractors are unable to scale up the manufacture of any of the Company's product candidates successfully in sufficient quality and quantity and at commercially reasonable prices, or are shut down or put on clinical hold by government regulators, and the Company is unable to find one or more replacement suppliers or manufacturers

capable of production at a substantially equivalent cost in substantially equivalent volumes and quality, and the Company is unable to transfer the processes successfully on a timely basis, the development of that product candidate and regulatory approval or commercial launch for any resulting products may be delayed, or there may be a shortage in supply, either of which could significantly harm its business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

The Company expects to continue to depend on third-party contract suppliers and manufacturers for the foreseeable future. The Company’s supply and manufacturing agreements do not guarantee that a contract supplier or manufacturer will provide services adequate for its needs. Additionally, any damage to or destruction of the Company’s third-party manufacturer’s or suppliers’ facilities or equipment, even by force majeure, may significantly impair the Company's ability to have its products and product candidates manufactured on a timely basis. The Company’s reliance on contract manufacturers and suppliers further exposes it to the possibility that they, or third parties with access to their facilities, will have access to and may misappropriate the Company’s trade secrets or other proprietary information. In addition, the manufacturing facilities of certain of the Company’s suppliers may be located outside of the United States. This may give rise to difficulties in importing the Company’s products or product candidates or their components into the United States or other countries.

Risks Related to the Company’s Financial Operations

The Company has expressed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Management has determined that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern due to uncertainties that the Company’s cash flows generated from its operations will be sufficient to meet its current operating costs and the Company’s future consolidated financial statements may include a similar qualification about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s year-end and interim financial statements were prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

If the Company is unable to meet its current operating costs, the Company would need to seek additional financing or modify its operational plans. If the Company seeks additional financing to fund its business activities in the future and there remains substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, investors or other financing sources may be unwilling to provide additional funding to the Company on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Failure to remediate a material weakness in internal accounting controls could result in material misstatements in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s management has identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness was due to a lack of controls in the financial closing and reporting process, including a lack of segregation of duties and the documentation and design of formalized processes and procedures surrounding the creation and posting of journal entries and account reconciliations. Additionally, the Company’s management identified a material weakness in its internal control over the fair value calculation of options granted during the quarter ended June 30, 2021. If not remediated, or if the Company identifies further material weaknesses in its internal controls, the Company’s failure to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in its consolidated financial statements and a failure to meet its reporting and financial obligations.

The Company may be adversely affected by natural disasters and other catastrophic events and by man-made problems such as terrorism that could disrupt its business operations, and its business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect it from a serious disaster.

The Company’s headquarters and main research facility are located in the greater San Diego area, which in the past has experienced severe earthquakes and fires. If these earthquakes, fires, other natural disasters, health pandemics or epidemics, terrorism and similar unforeseen events beyond its control, including for example the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, prevented it from using all or a significant portion of its headquarters or research facility, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for the Company to continue its business for a substantial period of time. The Company does not have a disaster recovery or business continuity plan in place and may incur substantial expenses as a result of the absence or limited nature of the Company’s internal or third-party service provider disaster recovery and business continuity plans, which, particularly when taken together with its lack of earthquake insurance, could have a material adverse effect on its business. Furthermore, integral parties in the Company’s supply chain are operating from single sites, increasing their vulnerability to natural disasters or other sudden, unforeseen and severe adverse events. If such an event were to affect its supply chain, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to conduct clinical trials, its development plans and its business.

If our information systems or data, or those of third parties upon which we rely, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse consequences.

In the ordinary course of our business, we may process, as defined above, proprietary, confidential, and sensitive data, including personal data (such as health-related patient data), intellectual property, and trade secrets (collectively, sensitive information). We may rely upon third-party service providers and technologies to operate critical business systems to process sensitive information in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, third-party providers of cloud-based infrastructure, employee email, CROs, and other functions. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. We may share or receive sensitive information with or from third parties.

The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks, cyber-intrusion, malicious internet-based activity, and online and offline fraud, are prevalent and have generally increased as the number, intensity, and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. These threats are becoming increasingly difficult to detect and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer hackers, threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we and the third parties upon which we rely may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including cyber-attacks that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our products.

We and the third parties upon which we rely may be subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social engineering attacks (including through phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks (such as credential stuffing), personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication and electrical failures. Ransomware attacks, including by organized criminal threat actors, nation-states, and nation-state-supported actors, are becoming increasingly prevalent and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments. Similarly, supply-chain attacks have increased in frequency and severity.

Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic and our remote workforce poses increased risks to our information technology systems and data, as more of our employees work from home, utilizing network connections outside our premises.

Any of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security breach or disruption. While the Company has not experienced any such security breach or other disruption to date, if such an event were to occur, it could result in unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive information and cause interruptions in the Company’s operations, including material disruptions of its development programs and business operations.

We may expend significant resources or modify our business activities (including our clinical trial activities) to try to protect against security breaches and disruptions. Certain data privacy and security obligations may require us to implement and maintain specific security measures, industry-standard or reasonable security measures to protect our information technology systems and sensitive information. While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against security incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We may be unable in the future to detect vulnerabilities in our information technology systems because such threats and techniques change frequently, are often sophisticated in nature, and may not be detected until after a security breach or disruption has occurred. Despite our efforts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities, if any, in our information technology systems, our efforts may not be successful. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities.

Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require us to notify relevant stakeholders of certain security breaches and disruptions. Such disclosures are costly, and the disclosure or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences. If we (or a third party upon whom we rely) experience a security breach or other disruption, or are perceived to have experienced such events, we may experience adverse consequences, including: government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing sensitive information (including personal data); litigation (including class claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions; interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. In particular, since the Company sponsors clinical trials, any breach or disruption that compromises patient data and identities could generate significant reputational damage, which may affect trust in the Company and our ability to recruit for future

clinical trials. Additionally, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in the Company’s regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase its costs to recover or reproduce the data.

Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security obligations. Furthermore, we cannot be sure that our insurance coverage will be adequate or sufficient to protect us from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of our privacy and security practices, that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims

The Company’s business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures, cyber-attacks or a deficiency in its cyber-security.

Despite the implementation of security measures, the Company’s internal computer systems and those of its current and future CROs and other contractors and consultants are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures. Although the Company has not suffered any material incidents to date, the risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber-terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. While the Company has not experienced any such material system failure, accident or security breach to date, if such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in the Company’s operations, it could result in a material disruption of its development programs and its business operations. In addition, since the Company sponsors clinical trials, any breach that compromises patient data and identities causing a breach of privacy could generate significant reputational damage and legal liabilities and costs to recover and repair, including affecting trust in the Company to recruit for future clinical trials. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in the Company’s regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase its costs to recover or reproduce the data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, the Company’s data or applications or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, the Company could incur liability and the further development and commercialization of its products and product candidates could be delayed.

Risks Related to the Company’s Intellectual Property

The Company’s success with respect to its product candidates will depend, in part, on its ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in both the U.S. and other countries, to preserve its trade secrets and to prevent third parties from infringing on its proprietary rights. The Company’s ability to protect its product candidates from unauthorized or infringing use by third parties depends in substantial part on its ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents around the world.

The patent application process, also known as patent prosecution, is expensive and time-consuming, and the Company and its current or future licensors and licensees may not be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner in all the countries that are desirable. It is also possible that the Company or its current licensors, or any future licensors or licensees, will fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. Therefore, these and any of the Company’s patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of its business. Moreover, the Company’s competitors independently may develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how or discover workarounds to the Company patents that would not constitute infringement. Any of these outcomes could impair the Company’s ability to enforce the exclusivity of its patents effectively, which may have an adverse impact on its business, financial condition and operating results.

Due to legal standards relating to patentability, validity, enforceability and claim scope of patents covering pharmaceutical inventions, the Company’s ability to obtain, maintain and enforce patents is uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions especially across countries. Accordingly, rights under any existing patents or any patents the Company might obtain or license may not cover its product candidates or may not provide the Company with sufficient protection for its product candidates to afford a sustainable commercial advantage against competitive products or processes, including those from branded, generic and over-the-counter pharmaceutical companies. In addition, the Company cannot guarantee that any patents or other intellectual property rights will issue from any pending or future patent or other similar applications owned by or licensed to the Company. Even if patents or other intellectual property rights have issued or will issue, the Company cannot guarantee that the claims of these patents and other rights are or will be held valid or enforceable by the courts, through injunction or otherwise, or will provide the Company with any significant protection against competitive products or otherwise be commercially valuable to the Company in every country of commercial significance that the Company may target.

The Company’s ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents depends on whether the differences between its technology and the prior art allow its technology to be patentable over the prior art. The Company does not have outstanding issued patents covering all of the recent developments in its technology and is unsure of the patent protection that it will be successful in obtaining, if any. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties may design around or challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of such issued patents or any other issued patents the Company owns or licenses, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents the Company holds or pursues with respect to its product candidates is challenged, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with the Company to develop or threaten its ability to commercialize or finance its product candidates.

The laws of some foreign jurisdictions do not provide intellectual property rights to the same extent or duration as in the U.S., and many companies have encountered significant difficulties in acquiring, maintaining, protecting, defending and especially enforcing such rights in foreign jurisdictions. If the Company encounters such difficulties in protecting or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting its intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions, its business prospects could be substantially harmed, especially internationally.

Proprietary trade secrets and unpatented know-how are also very important to the Company’s business. Although the Company has taken steps to protect its trade secrets and unpatented know-how by entering into confidentiality agreements with third parties, and intellectual property protection agreements with officers, directors, employees, and certain consultants and advisors, there can be no assurance that binding agreements will not be breached or enforced by courts, that the Company would have adequate remedies for any breach, including injunctive and other equitable relief, or that its trade secrets and unpatented know-how will not otherwise become known, inadvertently disclosed by the Company or its agents and representatives, or be independently discovered by its competitors. If trade secrets are independently discovered, the Company would not be able to prevent their use and if the Company and its agents or representatives inadvertently disclose trade secrets and/or unpatented know-how, the Company may not be allowed to retrieve this and maintain the exclusivity it previously held.

The Company may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on the Company’s product candidates does not guarantee exclusivity. The requirements for patentability differ in certain countries, particularly developing countries. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States, especially when it comes to granting use and other kinds of patents and what kind of enforcement rights will be allowed, especially injunctive relief in a civil infringement proceeding. Consequently, the Company may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing its inventions in all countries outside the United States and even in launching an identical version of the Company’s product notwithstanding the Company has a valid patent in that country. Competitors may use the Company’s technologies in jurisdictions where it has not obtained patent protection to develop their own products, or produce copy products, and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where the Company has patent protection but enforcement on infringing activities is inadequate or where the Company has no patents. These products may compete with the Company’s products, and the Company’s patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to pharmaceuticals, and the judicial and government systems are often corrupt, which could make it difficult for the Company to stop the infringement of its patents or marketing of competing products in violation of its proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce its patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert its efforts and attention from other aspects of its business, could put its global patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and its global patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against it. The Company may not prevail in any lawsuits that the Company initiates or infringement actions brought against the Company, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful when the Company is the plaintiff. If the Company is the defendant it may be required to post large bonds to stay in the market while it defends itself from an infringement action.

In addition, certain countries in Europe and certain developing countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties, especially if the patent owner does not enforce or use its patents over a protracted period of time. In some cases, the courts will force compulsory licenses on the patent holder even when finding the patent holder’s patents are valid if the court believes it is in the best interests of the country to have widespread access to an essential product covered by the patent. In these situations, the royalty the court requires to be paid by the license holder receiving the compulsory license is not calculated at fair market value and can be inconsequential, thereby disaffecting the patentholder’s business. In these countries, the Company may have limited remedies if its patents are infringed or if the Company is compelled to grant a license to its patents to a third party, which could also materially diminish the value of those patents. This would limit its potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly, the Company’s efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that the Company owns or licenses, especially in comparison to what it enjoys from enforcing

its intellectual property rights in the United States. Finally, the Company’s ability to protect and enforce its intellectual property rights may be adversely affected by unforeseen changes in both U.S. and foreign intellectual property laws, or changes to the policies in various government agencies in these countries, including but not limited to the patent office issuing patents and the health agency issuing pharmaceutical product approvals. Finally, many countries have large backlogs in patent prosecution, and in some countries in Latin America it can take years, even decades, just to get a pharmaceutical patent application reviewed notwithstanding the merits of the application.

Periodic maintenance and annuity fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the U.S. Patent and Trade Office ("USPTO") and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can, in many cases, be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction just for failure to know about and/or timely pay a prosecution fee. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees in prescribed time periods, and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents in the format and style the country requires. If the Company or its licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering its product candidates for any reason, the Company’s competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Company has entered into in-license agreements with respect to certain of its product candidates. These license agreements impose various diligence, milestone, royalty, insurance and other obligations on the Company. If the Company fails to comply with these obligations, the respective licensors may have the right to terminate the license, in which event the Company may not be able to develop or market the affected product candidate. The loss of such rights could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

If the Company is sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, such litigation could be costly and time consuming and could prevent or delay it from developing or commercializing its product candidates.

The Company’s commercial success depends on its ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell its product candidates and use its proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. The Company cannot assure that marketing and selling such candidates and using such technologies will not infringe existing or future patents. Numerous U.S.- and foreign-issued patents and pending patent applications owned by third parties exist in the fields relating to its product candidates. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that others may assert that its product candidates, technologies or methods of delivery or use infringe their patent rights. Moreover, it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents and other intellectual property rights cover various drugs, biologics, drug delivery systems or their methods of use, and which of these patents may be valid and enforceable. Thus, because of the large number of patents issued and patent applications filed in the Company’s fields across many countries, there may be a risk that third parties may allege they have patent rights encompassing the Company’s product candidates, technologies or methods.

In addition, there may be issued patents of third parties that are infringed or are alleged to be infringed by the Company’s product candidates or proprietary technologies notwithstanding patents the Company may possess. Because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, because patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing and because publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, the Company cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by its own and in-licensed issued patents or its pending applications. the Company’s competitors may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering the Company’s own product candidates or technology similar to the Company’s technology. Any such patent application may have priority over the Company’s own and in-licensed patent applications or patents, which could further require the Company to obtain rights to issued patents covering such technologies, which may mean paying significant licensing fees or the like. If another party has filed a U.S. patent application on inventions similar to those owned or in-licensed to us, the Company or, in

the case of in-licensed technology, the licensor may have to participate, in the United States, in an interference proceeding to determine priority of invention.

The Company may be exposed to, or threatened with, future litigation by third parties having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that its product candidates or proprietary technologies infringe such third parties’ intellectual property rights, including litigation resulting from filing under Paragraph IV of the Hatch-Waxman Act or other countries’ laws similar to the Hatch-Waxman Act. These lawsuits could claim that there are existing patent rights for such drug, and this type of litigation can be costly and could adversely affect its operating results and divert the attention of managerial and technical personnel, even if the Company does not infringe such patents or the patents asserted against the Company is ultimately established as invalid. There is a risk that a court would decide that the Company is infringing the third party’s patents and would order the Company to stop the activities covered by the patents. In addition, there is a risk that a court will order the Company to pay the other party significant damages for having violated the other party’s patents.

Because the Company relies on certain third-party licensors and partners and will continue to do so in the future, if one of its licensors or partners is sued for infringing a third party’s intellectual property rights, the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results and prospects could suffer in the same manner as if the Company were sued directly. In addition to facing litigation risks, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain third-party licensors and partners against claims of infringement caused by the Company’s proprietary technologies, and the Company has entered or may enter into cost-sharing agreements with some its licensors and partners that could require the Company to pay some of the costs of patent litigation brought against those third parties whether or not the alleged infringement is caused by its proprietary technologies. In certain instances, these cost-sharing agreements could also require the Company to assume greater responsibility for infringement damages than would be assumed just on the basis of its technology.

The occurrence of any of the foregoing could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results.

The Company may be subject to claims that its officers, directors, employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed to us alleged trade secrets of their former employers or their former or current customers.

As is common in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, certain of the Company’s employees were formerly employed by other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including its competitors or potential competitors. Moreover, the Company engages the services of consultants to assist us in the development of the Company's product candidates, many of whom were previously employed at, or may have previously been or are currently providing consulting services to, other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including the Company's competitors or potential competitors. The Company may be subject to claims that these employees and consultants or the Company has inadvertently or otherwise wrongfully used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers or their former or current customers. Although the Company has no knowledge of any such claims being alleged to date, if such claims were to arise, litigation may be necessary to defend against any such claims. Even if the Company is successful in defending against any such claims, any such litigation could be protracted, expensive, a distraction to its management team, not viewed favorably by investors and other third parties, and may potentially result in an unfavorable outcome.

Other Risks Related to the Company

The Company will need to raise additional financing in the future to fund its operations, which may not be available to it on favorable terms or at all.

The Company will require substantial additional funds to conduct the costly and time-consuming clinical efficacy trials necessary to pursue regulatory approval of LB1148 and any other product candidates. The Company’s future capital requirements will depend upon a number of factors, including: the number and timing of future product candidates in the pipeline; progress with and results from preclinical testing and clinical trials; the ability to manufacture sufficient drug supplies to complete preclinical and clinical trials; the costs involved in preparing, filing, acquiring, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent and other intellectual property claims; and the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals and favorable reimbursement or formulary acceptance. Raising additional capital may be costly or difficult to obtain and could significantly dilute stockholders’ ownership interests or inhibit the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives. If the Company raises additional funds through public or private equity offerings, the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely impact the rights of its common stockholders. Further, to the extent that the combined Company raises additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, stockholders' ownership interest in the Company will be diluted. In addition, any debt financing may subject the Company to fixed payment obligations and covenants limiting or restricting its ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If the Company raises additional capital through marketing and distribution arrangements or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, the Company may have to relinquish certain valuable intellectual property or other rights to its product candidates, technologies, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to it. Even if the Company were to obtain sufficient funding, there can be no assurance that it will be available on terms acceptable to the Company or its stockholders.

The Company’s business could be adversely affected by the effects of health pandemics or epidemics, including the recent COVID-19 pandemic, in regions where it or third parties on which it relies have significant manufacturing facilities, concentrations of clinical trial sites or other business operations. The COVID-19 pandemic could materially affect the Company’s operations, including at its headquarters in California, which has been in the past, and could be in the future, subject to a county-wide stay-at-home order, and at clinical trial sites, as well as the business or operations of manufacturers, CROs or other third parties with whom the Company conducts business.

The Company’s business could be adversely affected by the effects of health pandemics or epidemics in regions where it has concentrations of clinical trial sites or other business operations, and could cause significant disruption in the operations of third-party manufacturers and CROs upon whom it relies. For example, in December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, causing a disease referred to as COVID-19, was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. Since then, COVID-19 and its variants have spread to most countries, including the United States and many other countries. The Company’s headquarters is located in San Diego County, California, and many of the Company’s raw materials for manufacture of LB1148 are produced in foreign countries. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic and the U.S. government-imposed travel restrictions on travel between the United States and numerous other countries. Further, the President of the United States declared the COVID-19 pandemic a national emergency, invoking powers under the Stafford Act, the legislation that directs federal emergency disaster response. Similarly, the State of California declared a state of emergency related to the spread of COVID-19. Further, on March 19, 2020 the State of California declared a statewide stay at home order for an indefinite period of time (subject to certain exceptions to facilitate authorized necessary activities) to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the stay-at-home order, the Company implemented work from home policies for all of its employees. The stay-at-home order has since expired and currently not in effect. The effects of future stay-at-home orders and work from home policies may negatively impact productivity, disrupt business and delay clinical programs and timelines, the magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and other limitations on its ability to conduct business in the ordinary course. These and similar, and perhaps more severe, disruptions in operations could negatively impact the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition.

Quarantines, stay at home and similar government orders, or the perception that such orders, shutdowns or other restrictions on the conduct of business operations could occur, related to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases, may impact personnel at third-party manufacturing facilities in the United States and other countries, or the availability or cost of materials, which could disrupt the Company’s supply chain. In particular, some of the Company’s suppliers of certain materials used in the production of the Company’s drug products are located in countries outside the United States, where there have been government-imposed quarantines. While many of these materials may be obtained by more than one supplier, restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic may disrupt the Company’s supply chain or limit its ability to obtain sufficient materials for its product candidates.

Supply chain constraints associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted the availability of the components needed in the manufacture of LB1148 and, depending on the duration and extent of the pandemic or new strains, could impact the components and production capacity required for a commercial scale-up of LB1148. The Company's suppliers could be adversely impacted, which may result in delays or disruptions in the Company's current or future supply chain.

In addition, the Company’s clinical trials may be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical site initiation and patient enrollment may be delayed due to prioritization of hospital resources toward the COVID-19 pandemic. Some patients may not be able or willing to comply with clinical trial protocols if quarantines interrupt healthcare services, particularly surgical services. Similarly, the Company’s ability to recruit and retain patients, principal investigators and site staff (who as healthcare providers may have heightened exposure to COVID-19) may be hindered, which would adversely affect clinical trial operations. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic may cause interruption or delays in the operation of the FDA or other regulatory authorities which could negatively affect the Company’s planned clinical trials.

The spread of COVID-19, which has caused a broad impact globally, may materially affect the Company economically. While the potential economic impact brought by, and the duration of, the COVID-19 pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, it is currently resulting in significant disruption of global financial markets. This disruption, if sustained or recurrent, could make it more difficult for the Company to access capital, which could in the future negatively affect its liquidity. In addition, a recession or market correction resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially affect the Company’s business and the value of its common stock.

The global pandemic of COVID-19 continues to rapidly evolve. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar health pandemic or epidemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. The Company does not yet know the full extent of potential delays or impacts on its business, its clinical trials, healthcare systems or the global economy as a whole. These effects could have a material impact on the Company’s operations, and it will continue to monitor the COVID-19 situation closely. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects the Company’s operations, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section.

The stock price of the Company may be highly volatile.

The market price of shares of the Company could be subject to significant fluctuations. Since the completion of the Merger on April 27, 2021, the Company’s stock price has already been subject to significant fluctuation. Market prices for securities of biotechnology and other life sciences companies historically have been particularly volatile subject even to large daily price swings. Some of the factors that may cause the market price of shares of the Company to fluctuate include, but are not limited to:

•

the ability of the Company to obtain timely regulatory approvals for LB1148 or future product candidates, and delays or failures to obtain such approvals;

•

failure of LB1148, if approved, to achieve commercial success;

•

issues in manufacturing LB1148 or future product candidates;

•

the results of current and any future clinical trials of LB1148;

•

failure of other Company product candidates, if approved, to achieve commercial success;

•

the entry into, or termination of, or breach by partners of key agreements, including key commercial partner agreements;

•

the initiation of, material developments in, or conclusion of any litigation to enforce or defend any intellectual property rights or defend against the intellectual property rights of others;

•

announcements of any dilutive equity financings;

•

announcements by commercial partners or competitors of new commercial products, clinical progress or the lack thereof, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;

•

failure to elicit meaningful stock analyst coverage and downgrades of the Company’s stock by analysts; and

•

the loss of key employees.

Moreover, the stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility in the biotech industry that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of individual companies or a certain industry segment. These broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect the trading price of the Company’s shares.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, shareholders have often instituted class action securities litigation against those companies. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could significantly harm the Company’s profitability and reputation. In addition, such securities litigation often has ensued after a reverse merger or other merger and acquisition activity of the type that the Company recently completed with LBS. Such litigation if brought could negatively impact the Company’s business.

The Company is expected to take advantage of reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies, which could result in its common stock being less attractive to investors.

As of June 30, 2021, the last business day of the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the public float of the Company is less than $250 million and therefore qualifies as a smaller reporting company under the rules of the SEC. As a smaller reporting company, the Company will be able to take advantage of reduced disclosure requirements, such as simplified executive compensation disclosures and reduced financial statement disclosure requirements in its SEC filings. Decreased disclosures in the Company’s SEC filings due to its status as a smaller reporting company may make it harder for investors to analyze its results of operations and financial prospects. The Company cannot predict if investors will find the Company’s common stock less attractive if it relies on these exemptions. If some investors find its common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for its common stock and its stock price may be more volatile. The Company may take advantage of the reporting exemptions applicable to a smaller reporting company until it is no longer a smaller reporting company, which status would end once it has a public float greater than $250 million. In that event, the Company could still be a smaller reporting company if its annual revenues were below $100 million and it has a public float of less than $700 million.

The Company does not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

The current expectation is that the Company will retain its future earnings to fund the development and growth of its business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of the shares of the Company will be your sole source of gain, if any, for the foreseeable future.

If the Company fails to attract and retain management and other key personnel, it may be unable to successfully develop or commercialize its product candidates or otherwise implement its business plan.

The biotechnology industry has experienced a high rate of turnover in recent years. The Company’s ability to compete in the highly competitive biopharmaceuticals industry depends upon the ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and experienced personnel with scientific, medical, regulatory, manufacturing and management skills and experience. The Company will conduct its operations in the greater San Diego area, a region that is home to many other biopharmaceutical companies as well as many academic and research institutions, resulting in fierce competition for qualified personnel. The Company may not be able to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future due to the intense competition for a limited number of qualified personnel among biopharmaceutical companies. Many of the other biopharmaceutical companies against which the Company will compete have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry. The Company’s competitors may provide higher compensation, more diverse opportunities and/or better opportunities for career advancement. Any or all of these competing factors may limit the Company’s ability to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, which could negatively affect its ability to successfully develop and commercialize its product candidates and to grow the business and operations as currently contemplated.

The Company’s ability to use NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

The Company has incurred substantial losses during its history and does not expect to become profitable in the near future, and it may never achieve profitability. Unused U.S. federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards generated in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018, may be carried forward to offset future taxable income, if any, until such unused NOLs expire. Under current U.S. federal income tax law, U.S. federal NOLs generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, can be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such U.S. federal NOLs in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020, is limited to 80% of taxable income. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to current U.S. federal tax law.

In addition, both current and future unused NOLs and other tax attributes may be subject to limitation under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code"), and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50-percentage-point cumulative change, by value, in its equity ownership over a three-year period. To the extent the Company has undergone an ownership change, its ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income or taxes may be limited. Including the recently completed Merger, the Company has completed several equity offerings since its inception which may have resulted in an ownership change as defined by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, or could result in an ownership change in the future. The Company has not completed a Code Section ~~906~~382 and 383 analysis regarding the limitation of NOL and research and development credit carryforwards for all relevant tax years.

Accordingly, the Company's pre-2018 NOL carryforwards may expire prior to being used, its NOL carryforwards generated in 2018 and thereafter will be subject to a percentage limitation and, the Company's ability to use pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset post-change income or taxes may be limited. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit the Company's use of accumulated state tax attributes. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of NOLs is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed. As a result, even if the Company attains profitability, it may be unable to use all or a material portion of its NOLs and other tax attributes, which could adversely affect future cash flows.

Changes in tax law could adversely affect the Company’s business.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Treasury Department and other governmental bodies. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect the Company or holders of its common stock. In recent years, many such changes have been made and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. Future changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.

The Company will incur costs and demands upon management as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies.

The Company will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that the Company did not incur as a private company prior to the Merger, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements. The Company also incurs costs associated with corporate governance requirements, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as new implemented requirements by the SEC and Nasdaq. These rules and regulations are expected to increase the Company’s legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. For example, the Company’s management team consists of the executive officers of the Company prior to the Merger, some of whom have not previously managed and operated a public company. These executive officers and other personnel need to devote substantial time to gaining expertise regarding operations as a public company

and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. These rules and regulations also may make it difficult and expensive for the Company to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance. As a result, it may be more difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on the Company’s board of directors or as executive officers of the Company, which may adversely affect investor confidence in the Company and could cause its business or stock price to suffer.

Anti-takeover provisions in the Company’s charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of the Company more difficult and may prevent attempts by the Company stockholders to replace or remove the Company management.

Provisions in the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition or a change in management. In addition, because the Company is incorporated in Delaware, it is governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL, which prohibits stockholders owning in excess of 15% of the outstanding Company voting stock from merging or combining with the Company. Although the Company believes these provisions collectively will provide for an opportunity to receive higher bids by requiring potential acquirors to negotiate with the Company’s board of directors, they would apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by the Company’s stockholders to replace or remove then current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of the board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of management.

If the Company fails to maintain proper and effective internal controls, its ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis could be impaired.

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that the Company maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The Company must perform system and process evaluation and testing of its internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting in its Annual Report on Form 10-K filing for that year, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This has required that the Company incur substantial professional fees and internal costs to expand its accounting and finance functions and that it expend significant management efforts. The Company may experience difficulty in meeting these reporting requirements in a timely manner.

The Company may discover weaknesses in its system of internal financial and accounting controls and procedures that could result in a material misstatement of its consolidated financial statements. Prior to the Merger, LBS’s management identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness was due to a lack of controls in the financial closing and reporting process for LBS, including a lack of segregation of duties and the documentation and design of formalized processes and procedures surrounding the creation and posting of journal entries and account reconciliations. If the Company does not remediate this material weakness, or if the Company identifies further material weaknesses in its internal controls, the Company’s failure to establish and maintain effective internal financial and accounting controls and procedures could result in material misstatements in its consolidated financial statements and a failure to meet its reporting and financial obligations.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.

If the Company is not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or if it is unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls, the Company may not be able to produce timely and accurate consolidated financial statements. If that were to happen, the market price of ~~2002.~~

☐	~~Transition Report Under Section~~
☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 orOR 15(d) ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of~~OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Lease Months	Annual Base Rent	Monthly Installment of Base Rent			Monthly Base Rent per Rentable Square Foot
1-12*	$130,207.80	$	10,850.65	$3.95
13-24	$134,114.04	$	11,176.17	$4.07
25-36	$138,137.52	$	11,511.46	$4.19
37-39	$142,281.60	$	11,856.80	$4.32

~~Number~~	~~Exhibit Title~~	~~Filed~~ ~~Herewith~~
Exhibit Number	Description of document
~~31.1~~ 2.1†	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 16, 2020, by and among Seneca Biopharma, Inc., Leading BioSciences, Inc. and Townsgate Acquisition Sub 1, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 21, 2020).
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 27, 2021).
3.2	Certificate of Designation of Series A 4.5% Convertible Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 12, 2016).


3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 16, 2015).
4.1		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
4.2		Specimen Common Stock Certificate.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 17, 2022).
4.3		Form of Series A Preferred Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 12, 2016).
4.4		Form of Consulting Warrant issued January 2011 and March 2012 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-188859) original filed with the SEC on May 24, 2013
4.5		Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant from August 2017 Public Offering Dated August 1, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2017).
4.6		Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant from October 2018 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on October 29, 2018)
4.7		Form of Placement Agent Common Stock Purchase Warrant from October 2018 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on October 29, 2018)
4.8		Consultant Warrant for Hibiscus BioVentures, LLC issued January 2019 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.40 to the Registrant's Form 10-Q, originally filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019)
4.9		Form of Series M and Series N warrant from July 2019 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-232273), filed with the SEC on July 24, 2019)
4.10		Letter Agreement from January 2020 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on January 22, 2020)
4.11		Form of Series O Pre-Funded Warrant from July 2019 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-232273), filed with the SEC on July 24, 2019)
4.12		Form of Series Q Replacement Warrant issued in January 2020 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.02 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on January 22, 2020)
4.13		Form of Placement Agent Agreement from January 2020 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on January 22, 2020)
4.14		Form of Placement Agent Warrant issued in January 2020 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on January 22, 2020)
4.15		Form of Placement Agent Warrant issued in May 2020 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on May 27, 2020)
4.16		Form of Securities Purchase Agreement with Investors from May 2020 Offering (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, originally filed with the SEC on May 27, 2020)
4.17		Form of Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Leading BioSciences, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-251659), originally filed with the SEC on December 23, 2020, as amended).
4.18		Form of Bridge Warrant of Leading BioSciences, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 21, 2020).
4.19		Form of Equity Warrant of Leading BioSciences, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 21, 2020).
4.20†		Registration Rights Agreement, by and between Seneca Biopharma, Inc. and the investor party thereto, dated December 16, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 21, 2020).
4.21		Waiver Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2021, by and between Palisade Bio, Inc. and Altium Growth Fund, LP (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 22, 2021).
4.22		Warrant, dated as of July 21, 2021, issued to Altium Growth Fund, LP (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 22, 2021).
4.23		Waiver Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2022, by and between Palisade Bio, Inc. and Altium Growth Fund, LP (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2022).

☒	~~Quarterly Report Under Section~~
☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 orOR 15(d) ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of~~OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


4.24	Warrant, dated as of January 31, 2022, issued to Altium Growth Fund, LP (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2022).
4.25	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 19, 2021, by and between Palisade Bio, Inc. and Yuma Regional Medical Center (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 24, 2021).
4.26	Warrant, dated as of August 19, 2021, issued to Yuma Regional Medical Center (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 24, 2021).
4.27	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2022).
4.28	Form of Placement Agent Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2022).
10.1*	Office Lease Between AP Beacon Carlsbad, LP, and Palisade Bio, Inc., dated May 12, 2022
10.2†	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 6, 2022, by and among the Company and the purchasers named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2022).
10.3	Placement Agency Agreement, dated May 6, 2022, by and between the Company and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2022).
31.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer ~~Pursuant~~pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) ~~under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302~~ of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~	XExchange Act.
31.2*
~~31.2~~	Certification of Principal Financial Officer ~~Pursuant~~pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) ~~under~~of the ~~Securities~~Exchange Act.
32.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act, ~~of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to~~and 18 U.S.C. Section ~~302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~	X1350.
101.INS*	Inline XBRL Instance Document-the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File as its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
~~101.INS~~ 101.SCH*	~~XBRL Instance Document~~

~~101.SCH~~	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension ~~Schema Document~~	Schema.
101.CAL*
~~101.CAL~~	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation ~~Linkbase Document~~	Linkbase.
101.DEF*
~~101.DEF~~	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition ~~Linkbase Document~~	Linkbase.
101.LAB*
~~101.LAB~~	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label ~~Linkbase Document~~	Linkbase.
101.PRE*
~~101.PRE~~	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation ~~Linkbase Document~~Linkbase.
104*	Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).


	PALISADE BIO, INC.

Date: ~~September 14, 2021~~May 13, 2022		/s/ Thomas M. Hallam Ph.D.
		~~Thomas M.~~ Tom Hallam, ~~PhD,~~Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

~~Date: September 14, 2021~~		~~/s/ J.D. Finley~~
		~~J.D. Finley, Chief Financial Officer~~
		~~(Principal Financial Officer)~~

Large accelerated filer ☐

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer ☒

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company