FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Diana Shipping Inc., or the Company, desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. This document and any other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf may include forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The words "believe", "except," "anticipate," "intends," "estimate," "forecast," "project," "plan," "potential," "may," "should," "expect" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
Please note in this annual report, "we", "us", "our" and "the Company" all refer to Diana Shipping Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The forward-looking statements in this document are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections.
In addition to these important factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, including under the heading "Item 3.D.—Risk Factors," important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the strength of world economies, fluctuations in currencies and interest rates, general market conditions, including fluctuations in charter hire rates and vessel values, changes in demand in the dry-bulk shipping industry, changes in the supply of vessels, changes in the Company's operating expenses, including bunker prices, crew costs, drydocking and insurance costs, changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, potential liability from pending or future litigation, general domestic and international political conditions or labor disruptions, potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents or political events, and other important factors described from time to time in the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC.
SEC, and the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. We caution readers of this annual report not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
PART I
Item 1. Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
Not Applicable.
Item 2. Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable |
Not Applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
A. | A. | Selected Financial Data |
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data and other operating data. The selected consolidated financial data in the table as of December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 2011, 2010 and 20092011 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, ("or U.S. GAAP").GAAP. The following data should be read in conjunction with Item 5. "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects", the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.
| | As of and for the | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for share and per share data, fleet data and average daily results) | |
| | | |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time charter revenues | | $ | 157,712 | | | $ | 175,576 | | | $ | 164,005 | | | $ | 220,785 | | | $ | 255,669 | |
Other revenues | | | - | | | | - | | | | 447 | | | | 2,447 | | | | 1,117 | |
Voyage expenses | | | 15,528 | | | | 10,665 | | | | 8,119 | | | | 8,274 | | | | 10,597 | |
Vessel operating expenses | | | 88,272 | | | | 86,923 | | | | 77,211 | | | | 66,293 | | | | 55,375 | |
Depreciation and amortization of deferred charges | | | 76,333 | | | | 70,503 | | | | 64,741 | | | | 62,010 | | | | 55,278 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 25,335 | | | | 26,217 | | | | 23,724 | | | | 24,913 | | | | 25,123 | |
Management fees to related party | | | 405 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Foreign currency gain | | | (984 | ) | | | (528 | ) | | | (690 | ) | | | (1,374 | ) | | | (503 | ) |
Operating income / (loss) | | | (47,177 | ) | | | (18,204 | ) | | | (8,653 | ) | | | 63,116 | | | | 110,916 | |
Interest and finance costs | | | (15,555 | ) | | | (8,427 | ) | | | (8,140 | ) | | | (7,618 | ) | | | (4,924 | ) |
Interest and other income | | | 3,152 | | | | 3,627 | | | | 1,800 | | | | 1,432 | | | | 1,033 | |
| | As of and for the | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
| | except for share and per share data, fleet data and average daily results) | |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time charter revenues | | $ | 164,005 | | | $ | 220,785 | | | $ | 255,669 | | | $ | 275,448 | | | $ | 239,342 | |
Other revenues | | | 447 | | | | 2,447 | | | | 1,117 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Voyage expenses | | | 8,119 | | | | 8,274 | | | | 10,597 | | | | 12,392 | | | | 11,965 | |
Vessel operating expenses | | | 77,211 | | | | 66,293 | | | | 55,375 | | | | 52,585 | | | | 41,369 | |
Depreciation and amortization of deferred charges | | | 64,741 | | | | 62,010 | | | | 55,278 | | | | 53,083 | | | | 44,686 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 23,724 | | | | 24,913 | | | | 25,123 | | | | 25,347 | | | | 17,464 | |
Foreign currency gains | | | (690 | ) | | | (1,374 | ) | | | (503 | ) | | | (1,598 | ) | | | (478 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income / (loss) | | | (8,653 | ) | | | 63,116 | | | | 110,916 | | | | 133,639 | | | | 124,336 | |
Interest and finance costs | | | (8,140 | ) | | | (7,618 | ) | | | (4,924 | ) | | | (5,213 | ) | | | (3,284 | ) |
Interest and other income | | | 1,800 | | | | 1,432 | | | | 1,033 | | | | 920 | | | | 951 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of and for the | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
| | except for share and per share data, fleet data and average daily results) | |
Income / (loss) from derivative instruments | | | - | | | | 68 | | | | (118 | ) | | | (518 | ) | | | (737 | ) |
Income / (loss) from equity method investments | | | (5,133 | ) | | | 12,668 | | | | (6,094 | ) | | | (1,773 | ) | | | 1,207 | |
Net income / (loss) | | $ | (64,713 | ) | | $ | (10,268 | ) | | $ | (21,205 | ) | | $ | 54,639 | | | $ | 107,495 | |
Loss assumed by non-controlling interests | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2 | |
Dividends on series B preferred shares | | $ | (5,769 | ) | | $ | (5,080 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Net income / (loss) attributed to common stockholders | | $ | (70,482 | ) | | $ | (15,348 | ) | | $ | (21,205 | ) | | $ | 54,639 | | | $ | 107,497 | |
Earnings / (loss) per common share, basic and diluted | | $ | (0.89 | ) | | $ | (0.19 | ) | | $ | (0.26 | ) | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 1.33 | |
Weighted average number of common shares, basic and diluted | | | 79,518,009 | | | | 81,292,290 | | | | 81,328,390 | | | | 81,083,485 | | | | 81,081,774 | |
| | As of and for the | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (in thousands of U.S. dollars, | |
| | except for share and per share data, fleet data and average daily results) | |
Loss from derivative instruments | | | (118 | ) | | | (518 | ) | | | (737 | ) | | | (1,477 | ) | | | (505 | ) |
Income / (loss) from investment in Diana Containerships Inc. | | | (6,094 | ) | | | (1,773 | ) | | | 1,207 | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income / (loss) | | $ | (21,205 | ) | | $ | 54,639 | | | $ | 107,495 | | | $ | 127,869 | | | $ | 121,498 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss assumed by non controlling interests | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 2 | | | $ | 910 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income / (loss) attributed to Diana Shipping Inc. | | $ | (21,205 | ) | | $ | 54,639 | | | $ | 107,497 | | | $ | 128,779 | | | $ | 121,498 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings / (loss) per common share, basic | | $ | (0.26 | ) | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 1.33 | | | $ | 1.60 | | | $ | 1.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings / (loss) per common share, diluted | | $ | (0.26 | ) | | $ | 0.67 | | | $ | 1.33 | | | $ | 1.59 | | | $ | 1.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares, basic | | | 81,328,390 | | | | 81,083,485 | | | | 81,081,774 | | | | 80,682,770 | | | | 78,282,775 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average number of common shares, diluted | | | 81,328,390 | | | | 81,083,485 | | | | 81,124,348 | | | | 80,808,232 | | | | 78,385,464 | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 240,633 | | | $ | 446,624 | | | $ | 416,674 | | | $ | 345,414 | | | $ | 282,438 | |
Total current assets | | | 251,868 | | | | 466,986 | | | | 432,691 | | | | 354,649 | | | | 297,156 | |
Vessels' net book value | | | 1,320,375 | | | | 1,211,138 | | | | 1,046,719 | | | | 1,160,850 | | | | 979,343 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 22,826 | | | | 22,774 | | | | 21,659 | | | | 21,842 | | | | 200 | |
Total assets | | | 1,701,981 | | | | 1,742,802 | | | | 1,604,471 | | | | 1,585,389 | | | | 1,320,425 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 62,752 | | | | 61,477 | | | | 48,095 | | | | 32,510 | | | | 32,386 | |
Deferred revenue, non-current portion | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,227 | | | | 11,244 | |
Long-term debt (including current portion), net of deferred financing costs | | | 431,557 | | | | 459,112 | | | | 373,338 | | | | 383,623 | | | | 281,481 | |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 1,253,392 | | | | 1,266,424 | | | | 1,208,878 | | | | 1,169,930 | | | | 999,325 | |
Cash Flow Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 67,400 | | | $ | 119,886 | | | $ | 154,230 | | | $ | 178,292 | | | $ | 151,903 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (245,156 | ) | | | (169,913 | ) | | | (90,428 | ) | | | (252,313 | ) | | | (73,081 | ) |
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities | | | (28,235 | ) | | | 79,977 | | | | 7,458 | | | | 136,997 | | | | 141,583 | |
Fleet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average number of vessels (1) | | | 33.0 | | | | 27.6 | | | | 23.6 | | | | 22.9 | | | | 19.2 | |
Number of vessels at year-end | | | 36.0 | | | | 30.0 | | | | 24.0 | | | | 25.0 | | | | 20.0 | |
Weighted average age of dry bulk vessels at year-end (in years) | | | 6.6 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 6.3 | | | | 5.4 | | | | 4.9 | |
Weighted average age of containerships at year-end (in years) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 0.6 | | | | - | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 193,218 | | | $ | 218,901 | | | $ | 240,633 | | | $ | 446,624 | | | $ | 416,674 | |
Total current assets | | | 215,013 | | | | 238,234 | | | | 251,868 | | | | 466,986 | | | | 432,691 | |
Vessels' net book value | | | 1,440,803 | | | | 1,373,133 | | | | 1,320,375 | | | | 1,211,138 | | | | 1,046,719 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 23,489 | | | | 23,887 | | | | 22,826 | | | | 22,774 | | | | 21,659 | |
Total assets | | | 1,836,965 | | | | 1,787,122 | | | | 1,701,981 | | | | 1,742,802 | | | | 1,604,471 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 58,889 | | | | 98,092 | | | | 62,297 | | | | 61,477 | | | | 48,095 | |
Long-term debt (including current portion), net of deferred financing costs | | | 600,071 | | | | 484,256 | | | | 431,557 | | | | 459,112 | | | | 373,338 | |
Total stockholders' equity | | | 1,218,366 | | | | 1,282,226 | | | | 1,253,392 | | | | 1,266,424 | | | | 1,208,878 | |
Cash Flow Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 23,945 | | | $ | 44,910 | | | $ | 67,400 | | | $ | 119,886 | | | $ | 154,230 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (155,637 | ) | | | (152,513 | ) | | | (245,156 | ) | | | (169,913 | ) | | | (90,428 | ) |
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities | | | 106,009 | | | | 85,871 | | | | (28,235 | ) | | | 79,977 | | | | 7,458 | |
Fleet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average number of vessels (1) | | | 40.8 | | | | 37.9 | | | | 33.0 | | | | 27.6 | | | | 23.6 | |
Number of vessels at year-end | | | 43.0 | | | | 39.0 | | | | 36.0 | | | | 30.0 | | | | 24.0 | |
Weighted average age of vessels at year-end (in years) | | | 7.4 | | | | 7.1 | | | | 6.6 | | | | 6.0 | | | | 6.3 | |
| As of and for the | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | As of and for the | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
Ownership days (2) | | | 12,049 | | | | 10,119 | | | | 8,609 | | | | 8,348 | | | | 7,000 | | | | 14,900 | | | | 13,822 | | | | 12,049 | | | | 10,119 | | | | 8,609 | |
Available days (3) | | | 12,029 | | | | 9,998 | | | | 8,474 | | | | 8,208 | | | | 6,930 | | | | 14,600 | | | | 13,650 | | | | 12,029 | | | | 9,998 | | | | 8,474 | |
Operating days (4) | | | 11,944 | | | | 9,865 | | | | 8,418 | | | | 8,180 | | | | 6,857 | | | | 14,492 | | | | 13,564 | | | | 11,944 | | | | 9,865 | | | | 8,418 | |
Fleet utilization (5) | | | 99.3 | % | | | 98.7 | % | | | 99.3 | % | | | 99.7 | % | | | 98.9 | % | | | 99.3 | % | | | 99.4 | % | | | 99.3 | % | | | 98.7 | % | | | 99.3 | % |
Average Daily Results: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time charter equivalent (TCE) rate (6) | | $ | 12,959 | | | $ | 21,255 | | | $ | 28,920 | | | $ | 32,049 | | | $ | 32,811 | | | $ | 9,739 | | | $ | 12,081 | | | $ | 12,959 | | | $ | 21,255 | | | $ | 28,920 | |
Daily vessel operating expenses (7) | | | 6,408 | | | | 6,551 | | | | 6,432 | | | | 6,299 | | | | 5,910 | | | | 5,924 | | | | 6,289 | | | | 6,408 | | | | 6,551 | | | | 6,432 | |
| | Average number of vessels is the number of vessels that constituted our fleet for the relevant period, as measured by the sum of the number of days each vessel was a part of our fleet during the period divided by the number of calendar days in the period. |
| (2) | Ownership days are the aggregate number of days in a period during which each vessel in our fleet has been owned by us. Ownership days are an indicator of the size of our fleet over a period and affect both the amount of revenues and the amount of expenses that we record during a period. |
| (3) | Available days are the number of our ownership days less the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to scheduled repairs or repairs under guarantee, vessel upgrades or special surveys and the aggregate amount of time that we spend positioning our vessels for such events. The shipping industry uses available days to measure the number of days in a period during which vessels should be capable of generating revenues. |
| (4) | Operating days are the number of available days in a period less the aggregate number of days that our vessels are off-hire due to any reason, including unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry uses operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in a period during which vessels actually generate revenues. |
| (5) | We calculate fleet utilization by dividing the number of our operating days during a period by the number of our available days during the period. The shipping industry uses fleet utilization to measure a company's efficiency in finding suitable employment for its vessels and minimizing the amount of days that its vessels are off-hire for reasons other than scheduled repairs or repairs under guarantee, vessel upgrades, special surveys or vessel positioning for such events. |
| (6) | Time charter equivalent rates, or TCE rates, are defined as our time charter revenues less voyage expenses during a period divided by the number of our available days during the period, which is consistent with industry standards. Voyage expenses include port charges, bunker (fuel) expenses, canal charges and commissions. TCE rate is a non-GAAP measure, and management believes it is useful to investors because it is a standard shipping industry performance measure used primarily to compare daily earnings generated by vessels on time charters with daily earnings generated by vessels on voyage charters, because charter hire rates for vessels on voyage charters are generally not expressed in per day amounts while charter hire rates for vessels on time charters are generally expressed in such amounts. The following table reflects the calculation of our TCE rates for the periods presented. |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for | |
| TCE rates, which are expressed in U.S. dollars, and available days) | |
Time charter revenues | | $ | 164,005 | | | $ | 220,785 | | | $ | 255,669 | | | $ | 275,448 | | | $ | 239,342 | |
Less: voyage expenses | | | (8,119 | ) | | | (8,274 | ) | | | (10,597 | ) | | | (12,392 | ) | | | (11,965 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time charter equivalent revenues | | $ | 155,886 | | | $ | 212,511 | | | $ | 245,072 | | | $ | 263,056 | | | $ | 227,377 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available days | | | 12,029 | | | | 9,998 | | | | 8,474 | | | | 8,208 | | | | 6,930 | |
Time charter equivalent (TCE) rate | | $ | 12,959 | | | $ | 21,255 | | | $ | 28,920 | | | $ | 32,049 | | | $ | 32,811 | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for TCE rates, which are expressed in U.S. dollars, and available days) | |
Time charter revenues | | $ | 157,712 | | | $ | 175,576 | | | $ | 164,005 | | | $ | 220,785 | | | $ | 255,669 | |
Less: voyage expenses | | | (15,528 | ) | | | (10,665 | ) | | | (8,119 | ) | | | (8,274 | ) | | | (10,597 | ) |
Time charter equivalent revenues | | $ | 142,184 | | | $ | 164,911 | | | $ | 155,886 | | | $ | 212,511 | | | $ | 245,072 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Available days | | | 14,600 | | | | 13,650 | | | | 12,029 | | | | 9,998 | | | | 8,474 | |
Time charter equivalent (TCE) rate | | $ | 9,739 | | | $ | 12,081 | | | $ | 12,959 | | | $ | 21,255 | | | $ | 28,920 | |
| (7) | Daily vessel operating expenses, which include crew wages and related costs, the cost of insurance, expenses relating to repairs and maintenance, the costs of spares and consumable stores, tonnage taxes and other miscellaneous expenses, are calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by ownership days for the relevant period. |
B.
| B. | Capitalization and Indebtedness |
Not Applicable.
C. | C. | Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
Not Applicable.Applicable.
Some of the following risks relate principally to the industry in which we operate and our business in general. Other risks relate principally to the securities market and ownership of our securities, including our common stock.stock, Series B Preferred Shares, and 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020, which we refer to as our Notes. The occurrence of any of the events described in this section could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, or operating results, cash available for the payment of dividends on our shares and interest on our Notes, or the trading price of our common stock.securities.
Industry Specific Risk Factors
Charter hire rates for dry bulk carriers may remain at low levels or decrease in the future, which may adversely affect our earnings.
The dry bulk shipping industry is cyclical with attendant volatility in charter hire rates and profitability. The degree of charter hire rate volatility among different types of dry bulk carriers has varied widely, and charter hire rates for Panamax and Capesize dry bulk carriers have reached near historically low levels. Because we charter some of our vessels pursuant to short-term time charters, we are exposed to changes in spot market and short-term charter rates for dry bulk carriers and such changes may affect our earnings and the value of our dry bulk carriers at any given time. In addition, 24more than half of our vessels are scheduled to come off of their current charters in 2014,2016, based on their earliest redelivery date, for which we may be seeking new employment. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully charter our vessels in the future or renew existing charters at rates sufficient to allow us to meet our obligations or pay any dividends in the future. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the major commodities carried by water internationally. Because the factors affecting the supply of and demand for vessels are outside of our control and are unpredictable, the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable.
Factors that influence demand for vessel capacity include:
| Ÿ· | supply and demand for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| Ÿ· | changes in the exploration or production of energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| Ÿ· | the location of regional and global exploration, production and manufacturing facilities; |
| Ÿ· | the location of consuming regions for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products; |
| Ÿ· | the globalization of production and manufacturing; |
| Ÿ· | global and regional economic and political conditions, including armed conflicts and terrorist activities; embargoes and strikes; |
| Ÿ· | natural disasters and other disruptions in international trade; |
| Ÿ· | developments in international trade; |
| Ÿ· | changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including the distance cargo is transported by sea; |
| Ÿ· | environmental and other regulatory developments; |
| Ÿ· | currency exchange rates; and |
Factors that influence the supply of vessel capacity include:
| Ÿ· | the number of newbuilding orders and deliveries, including slippage in deliveries; |
| Ÿ· | the number of shipyards and ability of shipyards to deliver vessels; |
| · | port and canal congestion; |
| · | the scrapping rate of older vessels; |
| Ÿ· | the number of vessels that are out of service, namely those that are laid-up, drydocked, awaiting repairs or otherwise not available for hire. |
In addition to the prevailing and anticipated freight rates, factors that affect the rate of newbuilding, scrapping and laying-up include newbuilding prices, secondhand vessel values in relation to scrap prices, costs of bunkers and other operating costs, costs associated with classification society surveys, normal maintenance and insurance coverage, the efficiency and age profile of the existing dry bulk fleet in the market and government and industry regulation of maritime transportation practices, particularly environmental protection laws and regulations. These factors influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions.
Demand for our dry bulk carriers is dependent upon economic growth in the world's economies, including China and India, seasonal and regional changes in demand, changes in the capacity of the global dry bulk carrier fleet and the sources and supply of dry bulk cargo transported by sea. Given the seemingly large number of new dry bulk carriers currently on order with shipyards, the capacity of the global dry bulk carrier fleet seems likely tocould increase and economic growth may not resume in areas that have experienced a recession or continue in other areas. Adverse economic, political, social or other developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
The dry bulk carrier charter market remains significantly below its high in 2008, which has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and profitability, and may affect our ability to comply with our loan covenants.
The abrupt and dramatic downturn in the dry bulk charter market, from which we derive substantially all of our revenues, has severely affected the dry bulk shipping industry and has adversely affected our business. The Baltic Dry Index, or the BDI, a daily average of charter rates for key drybulk routes published by the Baltic Exchange Limited, has long been viewed as the main benchmark to monitor the movements of the dry bulk vessel charter market and the performance of the entire dry bulk shipping market. The BDI declined 94% in 2008 from a peak of 11,793 in May 2008 to a low of 663 in December 2008 and has remained volatile since then. During 2015, the BDI remained volatile, ranging from a high of 1,222 to a low of 471. The BDI recorded a 25-year record low of 647290 in 2012, and reached highs and lows of 2,337 and 698, respectively, in 2013.February 2016. There can be no assurance that the dry bulk charter market will not decrease further. The decline and volatility in charter rates is due to various factors, including the lack of trade financing for purchases of commodities carried by sea, which has resulted in a significant decline in cargo shipments, and the excess supply of iron ore in China, which has resulted in falling iron ore prices and increased stockpiles in Chinese ports. The decline and volatility in charter rates in the dry bulk market also affects the value of our dry bulk vessels, which follows the trends of dry bulk charter rates, and earnings on our charters, and similarly, affects our cash flows, liquidity and compliance with the covenants contained in our loan agreements.
The decline in the dry bulk carrier charter market has had and may continue to have additional adverse consequences for our industry, including an absence of financing for vessels, no active secondhand market for the sale of vessels, charterers seeking to renegotiate the rates for existing time charters, and widespread loan covenant defaults in the dry bulk shipping industry. Accordingly, the value of our common shares could be substantially reduced or eliminated.
Weak economic conditions throughout the world could negatively affect our earnings, financial condition and cash flows and may adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
Negative trends in the global economy continue to adversely affect global economic conditions. In addition, the world economy continues to face a number of new challenges, including recent turmoil and hostilities in the Middle East and other geographic areas and countries and continuing economic weakness in the European Union and Asia Pacific Region. The weakness in the global economy has caused, and may continue to cause, a decrease in worldwide demand for certain goods and, thus, shipping. We cannot predict how long the current market conditions will last. However, recent and developing economic and governmental factors, together with the concurrent decline in charter rates and vessel values, have had a material adverse effect on our earnings, financial condition and cash flows, have caused the price of our common shares to decline and could cause the price of our common shares to decline further.
The economies of the United States, the European Union and other parts of the world continue to experience relatively slow growth or remain in recession and exhibit weak economic trends. Securities and futures markets and the credit markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and other requirements. The SEC, other regulators, self-regulatory organizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies, and may effect changes in law or interpretations of existing laws.
A significant economic slowdown in the Asia Pacific region could exacerbate the effect of recent slowdowns in the economies of the United States and the European Union and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and earnings.
Continued economic slowdown in the Asia Pacific region, especiallyparticularly in Japan and China, may exacerbate the effect on us of the recent slowdowncontinued weakness in the rest of the world.world, as we anticipate a significant number of the port calls made by our vessels will continue to involve the loading or discharging of dry bulk commodities in ports in the Asia Pacific region. Before the global economic financial crisis that began in 2008, China had one of the world's fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product, or GDP, which had a significant impact on shipping demand. The growth rate of China's GDP decreased slightlyis estimated to approximately 7.7%be around 6.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to approximately 7.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012, and continues to remain below pre-2008 levels. China has imposed measures to restrain lending,2015, which may further contribute to a slowdownis China's slowest growth rate in its economic growth.25 years. China and other countries in the Asia Pacific region may continue to experience slowed or even negative economic growth in the future. Moreover, the current economic slowdown in the economies of the United States, the European Union and other Asian countries may further adversely affect economic growth in China and elsewhere. Our earnings and ability to grow our fleet would be impeded by a continuing or worsening economic downturn in any of these countries.
A decrease in the level of China's export of goods or an increase in trade protectionism could have a material adverse impact on our charterers' business and, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact on our earnings, financial condition and cash flows.
Our vessels may be deployed on routes involving trade in and out of emerging markets, and our charterers' shipping and business revenue may be derived from the shipment of goods from the Asia Pacific region to various overseas export markets including the United States and Europe. Any reduction in or hindrance to the output of China-based exporters could have a material adverse effect on the growth rate of China's exports and on our charterers' business.
For instance, the government of China has recently implemented economic policies aimed at increasing domestic consumption of Chinese-made goods.goods and restricting currency exchanges within China. This may have the effect of reducing the supply of goods available for export and may, in turn, result in a decrease of demand for container shipping. Additionally, though in China there is an increasing level of autonomy and a gradual shift in emphasis to a "market economy" and enterprise reform, many of the reforms, particularly some limited price reforms that result in the prices for certain commodities being principally determined by market forces, are unprecedented or experimental and may be subject to revision, change or abolition. The level of imports to and exports from China could be adversely affected by changes to these economic reforms by the Chinese government, as well as by changes in political, economic and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Chinese government.
Our operations expose us to the risk that increased trade protectionism will adversely affect our business. If the continuing global recovery is undermined by downside risks and the recent economic downturn is prolonged, governments may turn to trade barriers to protect their domestic industries against foreign imports, thereby depressing the demand for shipping. Specifically, increasing trade protectionism in the markets that our charterers serve has caused and may continue to cause an increase in: (i) the cost of goods exported from China, (ii) the length of time required to deliver goods from China and (iii) the risks associated with exporting goods from China, as well as a decrease in the quantity of goods to be shipped.
Any increased trade barriers or restrictions on trade, especially trade with China, would have an adverse impact on our charterers' business, operating results and financial condition and could thereby affect their ability to make timely charter hire payments to us and to renew and increase the number of their time charters with us. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, earnings and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.shareholders and interest on our Notes.
The current state of global financial markets and current economic conditions may adversely impact our ability to obtain additional financing or refinance our existing loan and credit facilities on acceptable terms which may hinder or prevent us from expanding our business.
Global financial markets and economic conditions continue to be volatile. This volatility has negatively affected the general willingness of banks and other financial institutions to extend credit, particularly in the shipping industry, due to the historically volatile asset values of vessels. As the shipping industry is highly dependent on the availability of credit to finance and expand operations, it has been and may continue to be negatively affected by this decline in lending. The current state of global financial markets might adversely impact our ability to issue additional equity at prices which will not be dilutive to our existing shareholders or preclude us from issuing equity at all.
Also, as a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets has increased as many lenders have increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending standards, refused to refinance existing debt at all or on terms similar to current debt and reduced, and in some cases ceased, to provide funding to borrowers. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that additional financing will be available if needed and to the extent required, or that we will be able to refinance our existing loan and credit facilities, on acceptable terms or at all. If additional financing or refinancing is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our obligations as they come due or we may be unable to enhance our existing business, complete additional vessel acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities as they arise.
The instability of the euro or the inability of countries to refinance their debts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, profitability and financial position.
As a result of the credit crisis in Europe, in particular in Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain, the European Commission created the European Financial Stability Facility, or the EFSF, and the European Financial Stability Mechanism, or the EFSM, to provide funding to Eurozone countries in financial difficulties that seek such support. In March 2011,September 2012, the European Council agreed on the need for Eurozone countries to establishestablished a permanent stability mechanism, the European Stability Mechanism, or the ESM, which was established on September 27, 2012 to assume the role of the EFSF and the EFSM in providing external financial assistance to Eurozone countries. Despite these measures, concerns persist regarding the debt burden of certain Eurozone countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations and the overall stability of the euro. An extended period of adverse development in the outlook for European countries could reduce the overall demand for dry bulk cargoes and for our services. These potential developments, or market perceptions concerning these and related issues, could affect our financial position, earnings and cash flow.
An over-supply of dry bulk carrier capacity may prolong or further depress the current low charter rates and, in turn, adversely affect our profitability.
The market supply of dry bulk carriers has been increasing due to the high level of new deliveries in the last few years. Dry bulk newbuildings were delivered in significant numbers starting at the beginning of 2006 and continued to be delivered in significant numbers through the end of 2013.2015. While vessel supply will continue to be affected by the delivery of new vessels and the removal of vessels from the global fleet, either through scrapping or accidental losses, an over-supply of dry bulk carrier capacity could prolong the period during which low charter rates prevail. Currently, 24more than half of our vessels are scheduled to come off of their current charters in 2014,2016, based on their earliest redelivery date, for which we may be seeking new employment.
World events could affect our earnings and financial condition.
Continuing conflicts and recent developments in the Middle East, including Egypt,North Africa and North Africa,Ukraine, and the presence of U.S. and other armed forces in the Middle East, may lead to additional acts of terrorism and armed conflict around the world, which may contribute to further economic instability in the global financial markets. These uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. In the past, political conflicts have also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. Acts of terrorism and piracy have also affected vessels trading in regions such as the South China Sea, and the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia.Somalia and the Gulf of Guinea. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels have recently increased in frequency, which could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. Although the frequency of sea piracy worldwide has generally decreased during 2012 to its lowest level since 2009,2013, sea piracy incidents continue to occur, particularly in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and increasingly in the Gulf of Guinea, with dry bulk vessels and tankers particularly vulnerable to such attacks. IfActs of piracy could result in harm or danger to the crews that man our vessels. In addition, if these piracy attacks resultoccur in regions in which our vessels are deployed beingthat insurers characterized as "war risk" zones by insurers, as the Gulf of Aden temporarily was in May 2008, or Joint War Committee "war and strikes" listed areas, premiums payable for such coverage could increase significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including due to employing onboard security guards, could increase in such circumstances. Furthermore, while we believe the charterer remains liable for charter payments when a vessel is seized by pirates, the charterer may dispute this and withhold charterhire until the vessel is released. A charterer may also claim that a vessel seized by pirates was not "on-hire" for a certain number of days and is therefore entitled to cancel the charter party, a claim that we would dispute. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, any detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost, or unavailability, of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and earnings.
If economic conditions throughout the world do not improve, it will impede our earnings, financial condition and cash flows.
Negative trends in the global economy that emerged in 2008 continue to adversely affect global economic conditions. In addition, the world economy continues to face a number of new challenges, including uncertainty related to the continuing discussions in the United States regarding the federal debt ceiling and recent turmoil and hostilities in the Middle East, North Africa and other geographic areas and countries and continuing economic weakness in the European Union. The deterioration in the global economy has caused, and may continue to cause, a decrease in worldwide demand for certain goods and, thus, shipping. We cannot predict how long the current market conditions will last. However, recent and developing economic and governmental factors, together with the concurrent decline in charter rates and vessel values, have had a material adverse effect on our earnings, financial condition and cash flows, have caused the price of our common shares to decline and could cause the price of our common shares to decline further.
The economies of the United States, the European Union and other parts of the world continue to experience relatively slow growth or remain in recession and exhibit weak economic trends. The credit markets in the United States and Europe have experienced significant contraction, deleveraging and reduced liquidity, and the U.S. federal government and state governments and European authorities continue to implement a broad variety of governmental action and/or new regulation of the financial markets. Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, severely disrupted and volatile. Since 2008, lending by financial institutions worldwide remains at very low levels compared to the period preceding 2008.
Our operating results are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which could affect our operating results and the amount of available cash with which we could pay dividends, if declared.results.
We operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter hire rates. This seasonality may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results which could affect the amount of dividends, if any, that we may pay to our shareholders from quarter to quarter.results. The dry bulk carrier market is typically stronger in the fall and winter months in anticipation of increased consumption of coal and other raw materials in the northern hemisphere during the winter months. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. As a result, our revenues may be weaker during the fiscal quarters ended June 30 and September 30, and, conversely, our revenues may be stronger in fiscal quarters ended December 31 and March 31. While this seasonality will not directly affect our operating results, and cash available for distribution to our shareholders as dividends as long as our fleet is employed on period time charters, it could materially affect our operating results to the extent our vessels are employed in the spot market in the future.
Fuel, or bunker prices, may adversely affect profits.
While we generally will not bear the cost of fuel, or bunkers for vessels operating on time charters, fuel is a significant factor in negotiating charter rates. As a result, an increase in the price of fuel beyond our expectations may adversely affect our profitability at the time of charter negotiation. Fuel is also a significant, if not the largest, expense in our shipping operations when vessels are under voyage charter. TheWhile the price of fuel is currently at very low levels due to the price of oil, the price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. Further, fuel may become much more expensive in the future, which may reduce the profitability and competitiveness of our business versus other forms of transportation, such as truck or rail.
We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental regulations that can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.
Our operations are subject to numerous laws and regulations in the form of international conventions and treaties, national, state and local laws and national and international regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or are registered, which can significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. These requirements include, but are not limited to, European Union Regulations, the United Nation's International Maritime Organization, or IMO, International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1973, or MARPOL, including the designation of Emission Control Areas, or ECAs, thereunder, the IMO International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1974, the International Convention on Load Lines of 1966, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, requirements of the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA, the U.S. Clean Air Act, U.S. Clean Water Act and the U.S. Marine Transportation Security Act of 2002. Compliance with such laws, regulations and standards, where applicable, may require installation of costly equipment or operational changes and may affect the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. We may also incur additional costs in order to comply with other existing and future regulatory obligations, including, but not limited to, costs relating to air emissions including greenhouse gases, the management of ballast and bilge waters, maintenance and inspection, development and implementation of emergency procedures and insurance coverage or other financial assurance of our ability to address pollution incidents. These costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, earnings, cash flows and financial condition. A failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our operations. Environmental laws often impose strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of oil and hazardous substances, which could subject us to liability without regard to whether we were negligent or at fault. Under OPA, for example, owners, operators and bareboat charterers are jointly and severally strictly liable for the discharge of oil within the 200-mile exclusive economic zone around the United States. Furthermore, the 2010 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon and the subsequent release of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, or other events, may result in further regulation of the shipping industry, and modifications to statutory liability schemes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, earnings and cash flows. For example, in April 2015, it was announced that new regulations are expected to be imposed in the United States regarding offshore oil and gas drilling. An oil spill could result in significant liability, including fines, penalties and criminal liability and remediation costs for natural resource damages under other federal, state and local laws, as well as third-party damages. We are required to satisfy insurance and financial responsibility requirements for potential oil (including marine fuel) spills and other pollution incidents. Although we have arranged insurance to cover certain environmental risks, there can be no assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to cover all such risks or that any claims will not have a material adverse effect on our business, earnings, cash flows and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends.
dividends to our shareholders and interest on our Notes.
We are subject to international safety regulations and requirements imposed by our classification societies and the failure to comply with these regulations and requirements may subject us to increased liability, may adversely affect our insurance coverage and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
The operation of our vessels is affected by the requirements set forth in the IMO's International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code. The ISM Code requires ship owners, ship managers and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive "Safety Management System" that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. The failure of a shipowner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code may subject it to increased liability, may invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. Each of the vessels that has been delivered to us is ISM Code-certified and we expect that each other vessel that we have agreed to purchase will be ISM Code-certified when delivered to us.
In addition, vessel classification societies also impose significant safety and other requirements on our vessels. In complying with current and future environmental requirements, vessel-owners and operators may also incur significant additional costs in meeting new maintenance and inspection requirements, in developing contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining insurance coverage. Government regulation of vessels, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, can be expected to become stricter in the future and require us to incur significant capital expenditures on our vessels to keep them in compliance.
The operation of our vessels is also affected by other government regulation in the form of international conventions, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which the vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration. We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses, certificates, and financial assurances with respect to our operations. Because such conventions, laws, and regulations are often revised, we cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with such conventions, laws and regulations or the impact thereof on the resale prices or useful lives of our vessels. Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of our doing business and which may materially adversely affect our operations. We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses, certificates, and financial assurances with respect to our operations.
Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls and new security regulations could increase costs and disrupt our business.
International shipping is subject to various security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin, destination and trans-shipment points. These security procedures can result in cargo seizure, delays in the loading, offloading, trans-shipment or delivery and the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against us.
For example, since the events of September 11, 2001, U.S. authorities have significantly increased the levels of inspection for all imported containers. Government investment in non-intrusive container scanning technology has grown, and there is interest in electronic monitoring technology, including so-called "e-seals" and "smart" containers that would enable remote, centralized monitoring of containers during shipment to identify tampering with or opening of the containers, along with potentially measuring other characteristics such as temperature, air pressure, motion, chemicals, biological agents and radiation.
It is possible that changes to inspection procedures such as those described above, could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us. Changes to inspection procedures could also impose additional costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo uneconomical or impractical. Any such changes or developments may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and earnings.
The operation of dry bulk carriers has certain unique operational risks which could affect our earnings and cash flow.
The operation of vessels, such as dry bulk carriers, has certain unique risks. With a dry bulk carrier, the cargo itself and its interaction with the vessel can be an operational risk. By their nature, dry bulk cargoes are often heavy, dense, easily shifted, and react badly to water exposure. In addition, dry bulk carriers are often subjected to battering treatment during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold) and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to breach to the sea. Hull breaches in dry bulk carriers may lead to the flooding of the vessels' holds. If a dry bulk carrier suffers flooding in its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the vessel's bulkheads leading to the loss of a vessel. If we are unable to adequately repair our vessels after such damages, we may be unable to prevent these events. Any of these circumstances or events could negatively impact our business, financial condition, earnings, and ability to pay dividends, if any, in the future.future, and interest on our Notes. In addition, the loss of any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator.
If our vessels call on ports located in countries that are subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the U.S. or other governments, that could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our common stock.
From time to time on charterers' instructions, our vessels may call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States government and countries identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism, including Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria. Since July 11, 2011, none of our vessels have called on ports in Sudan or Syria. The U.S. sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or strengthened over time. In 2010, the U.S. enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act, or CISADA, which expanded the scope of the Iran Sanctions Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the prohibitions to companies such as ours and introduces limits on the ability of companies and persons to do business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined petroleum or petroleum products. In addition, in 2012, President Obama signed Executive Order 13608 which prohibits foreign persons from violating or attempting to violate, or causing a violation of any sanctions in effect against Iran or facilitating any deceptive transactions for or on behalf of any person subject to U.S. sanctions. Any persons found to be in violation of Executive Order 13608 will be deemed a foreign sanctions evader and will be banned from all contacts with the United States, including conducting business in U.S. dollars. Also in 2012, President Obama signed into law the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, or the Iran Threat Reduction Act, which created new sanctions and strengthened existing sanctions. Among other things, the Iran Threat Reduction Act intensifies existing sanctions regarding the provision of goods, services, infrastructure or technology to Iran's petroleum or petrochemical sector. The Iran Threat Reduction Act also includes a provision requiring the President of the United States to impose five or more sanctions from Section 6(a) of the Iran Sanctions Act, as amended, on a person the President determines is a controlling beneficial owner of, or otherwise owns, operates, or controls or insures a vessel that was used to transport crude oil from Iran to another country and (1) if the person is a controlling beneficial owner of the vessel, the person had actual knowledge the vessel was so used or (2) if the person otherwise owns, operates, or controls, or insures the vessel, the person knew or should have known the vessel was so used. Such a person could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including exclusion from U.S. capital markets, exclusion from financial transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and exclusion of that person's vessels from U.S. ports for up to two years. In addition, the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (IFCA) and Executive Order 13645 went into effect on July 1, 2013. Pursuant to the IFCA, as implemented by Executive Order 13645, a person is subject to sanctions for the provision of material support to Iranian Specially Designated Nationals, members of the Iranian energy, shipping and shipbuilding sectors and Iranian port operators. The foregoing also expanded existing Iran sanctions against persons or foreign financial institutions relating to, among other things, the sale and transport of Iranian petroleum, petroleum products and petrochemicals.
On November 24, 2013, the P5+1 (the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia and China) entered into an interim agreement with Iran entitled the "Joint Plan of Action" ("JPOA")., or JPOA. Under the JPOA it was agreed that, in exchange for Iran taking certain voluntary measures to ensure that its nuclear program is used only for peaceful purposes, the U.S. and E.U. would voluntarily suspend certain sanctions for a period of six months.
On January 20, 2014, the U.S. and E.U. indicated that they would begin implementing the temporary relief measures provided for under the JPOA. These measures include, among other things, the suspension of certain sanctions on the Iranian petrochemicals, precious metals, and automotive industries from January 20, 2014 until July 20, 2014. The JPOA was extended twice.
On July 14, 2015, the P5+1 and the EU announced that they reached a landmark agreement with Iran titled the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran's Nuclear Program, or the JCPOA, which is intended to significantly restrict Iran's ability to develop and produce nuclear weapons for 10 years while simultaneously easing sanctions directed toward non-U.S. persons for conduct involving Iran, but taking place outside of U.S. jurisdiction and does not involve U.S. persons. On January 16, 2016, or Implementation Day, the United States joined the EU and the UN in lifting a significant number of their nuclear-related sanctions on Iran following an announcement by the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, that Iran had satisfied its respective obligations under the JCPOA.
U.S. sanctions prohibiting certain conduct that is now permitted under the JCPOA have not actually been repealed or permanently terminated at this time. Rather, the U.S. government has implemented changes to the sanctions regime by: (1) issuing waivers of certain statutory sanctions provisions; (2) committing to refrain from exercising certain discretionary sanctions authorities; (3) removing certain individuals and entities from OFAC's sanctions lists; and (4) revoking certain Executive Orders and specified sections of Executive Orders. These sanctions will not be permanently "lifted" until the earlier of "Transition Day," set to occur on October 20, 2023, or upon a report from the IAEA stating that all nuclear material in Iran is being used for peaceful activities.
Although it is our intention to comply with the provisions of the JPOA,JCPOA, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future as such regulations and U.S. Sanctions may be amended over time, and the U.S. retains the authority to revoke the aforementioned relief if Iran fails to meet its commitments under the JPOA.JCPOA.
Certain of our charterers or other parties that we have entered into contracts with may be affiliated with persons or entities that are the subject of sanctions imposed by the Obama administration, and European Union and/or other international bodies as a result of the annexation of Crimea by Russia in March 2014. If we determine that such sanctions require us to terminate existing contracts or if we are found to be in violation of such applicable sanctions, our results of operations may be adversely affected or we may suffer reputational harm.
Although we believe that we have been in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations, and intend to maintain such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines, penalties or other sanctions that could severely impact our ability to access U.S. capital markets and conduct our business, and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us. In addition, certain institutional investors may have investment policies or restrictions that prevent them from holding securities of companies that have contracts with countries identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism. The determination by these investors not to invest in, or to divest from, our common stock may adversely affect the price at which our common stock trades. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation. In addition, our reputation and the market for our securities may be adversely affected if we engage in certain other activities, such as entering into charters with individuals or entities in countries subject to U.S. sanctions and embargo laws that are not controlled by the governments of those countries, or engaging in operations associated with those countries pursuant to contracts with third parties that are unrelated to those countries or entities controlled by their governments. Investor perception of the value of our common stock may be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.
Maritime claimants could arrest or attach one or more of our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow.flows.
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo, lenders, and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a claimantmaritime lien holder may seek to obtain security forenforce its claimlien by arresting or attaching a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could interrupt our cash flowflows and require us to pay large sums of money to have the arrest or attachment lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the "sister ship" theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel whichthat is subject to the claimant's maritime lien and any "associated" vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could attempt to assert "sister ship" liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our vessels.
We conduct business in China, where the legal system is not fully developed and has inherent uncertainties that could limit the legal protections available to us.
Some of our vessels may be chartered to Chinese customers and from time to time on our charterers' instructions, our vessels may call on Chinese ports. Such charters and voyages may be subject to regulations in China that may require us to incur new or additional compliance or other administrative costs and may require that we pay to the Chinese government new taxes or other fees. Applicable laws and regulations in China may not be well publicized and may not be known to us or to our charterers in advance of us or our charterers becoming subject to them, and the implementation of such laws and regulations may be inconsistent. Changes in Chinese laws and regulations, including with regards to tax matters, or changes in their implementation by local authorities could affect our vessels if chartered to Chinese customers as well as our vessels calling to Chinese ports and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in a loss of earnings.
A government could requisition one or more of our vessels for title or for hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes her owner, while requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes her charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during periods of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although we would be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our vessels, the amount and timing of payment would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels may negatively impact our revenues and reduce the amount of cash we may have available for distribution as dividends to our shareholders, if any such dividends are declared.
Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could result in fines, criminal penalties and an adverse effect on our business.
We may operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is consistent and in full compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, earnings or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
Company Specific Risk Factors
The market values of our vessels have decreased, which could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow under our creditloan facilities.
The fair market valuevalues of our vessels isare related to prevailing freight charter rates. While the fair market value of vessels and the freight charter market have a very close relationship as the charter market moves from trough to peak, the time lag between the effect of charter rates on market values of ships can vary.
The fair market values of our vessels have generally experienced high volatility, and you should expect the market value of our vessels to fluctuate depending on a number of factors including:
| · | the prevailing level of charter hire rates; |
| · | general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry; |
| · | competition from other shipping companies and other modes of transportation; |
| · | the types, sizes and ages of vessels; |
| · | the supply and demand for vessels; |
| · | applicable governmental regulations; |
| · | technological advances; and |
| · | the cost of newbuildings. |
As a result of the decline in the market value of our fleet, we may not be able to obtain other financing or incur debt on terms that are acceptable to us or at all.
A decrease in the market values of our vessels could cause us to breach covenants in our creditloan facilities and adversely affect our operating results.
The market values of our vessels are at relativelyvery low levels compared to historical averages. As at December 31, 2013,2015, we believe we arewere in compliance with all of the covenants of our credit facilities.loan facilities, however we obtained a waiver from the applicable lender under one of our loan facilities with regard to the minimum hull cover ratio requirement contained in the facility. If we are not in compliance with our creditloan facilities or are unable to obtain waivers, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our fleet. In addition, if the book value of a vessel is impaired due to unfavorable market conditions or a vessel is sold at a price below its book value, we would incur a loss that could adversely affect our operating results.
We charter some of our vessels on short-term time charters in a volatile shipping industry and the decline in charter hire rates could affect our results of operations and our ability to pay dividends.
We charter certain of our vessels pursuant to short-term time charters, although we have also entered in the past into long-term time charters ranging in duration on commencement of the time charter from 16 monthsup to 6261 months. Although significant exposure to short-term time charters is not unusual in the dry bulk shipping industry, the short-term time charter market is highly competitive and spot market charter hire rates (which affect time charter rates) may fluctuate significantly based upon available charters and the supply of, and demand for, seaborne shipping capacity. While the short-term time charter market may enable us to benefit in periods of increasing charter hire rates, we must consistently renew our charters and this dependence makes us vulnerable to declining charter rates. As a result of the volatility in the dry bulk carrier charter market, we may not be able to employ our vessels upon the termination of their existing charters at their current charter hire rates. The dry bulk carrier charter market is volatile, and in the recent past, short-term time charter and spot market charter rates for some dry bulk carriers declined below the operating costs of those vessels before rising. We cannot assure you that future charter hire rates will enable us to operate our vessels profitably, or to pay dividends.
Rising crew costs could adversely affect our results of operations.
Due to an increase in the size of the global shipping fleet, the limited supply of and increased demand for crew has created upward pressure on crew costs. Continued higher crew costs or further increases in crew costs could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our investment in Diana Containerships Inc. exposes us to the risks of the containership market.market and the value of our investment may be adversely affected.
We currently haveAs at December 31, 2015 we had a $50$48.8 million outstanding balance of a loan facility with and ownowned approximately 9.51%26.08% of Diana Containerships Inc. (NASDAQ:DCIX), or Diana Containerships, which operates in the containership market. Through this investment, we are partially exposed to containership market risks such as the cyclicality and volatility of charterhire rates;rates, the reduction in demand for container shipping due to the recent global economic recession;recession, increased risk of charter counterparty risk due to financial pressure on liner companies as a result of a decline in global trade;trade, and the risk of over-supply of containership capacity. Containership market risks may reduce the value of our investment in Diana Containerships and could adversely affect our financial condition. Additionally, on January 14, 2016, Diana Containerships received written notification from The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC indicating that because the closing bid price of their common stock for the 30 consecutive business days following the notice was below US$1.00 per share, they no longer meet the minimum bid price requirement for The Nasdaq Global Select Market set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(1). Pursuant to The Nasdaq Listing Rules, the applicable grace period to regain compliance is 180 calendar days, or until July 12, 2016. According to Diana Containerships, the notification letter has no effect at this time on the listing of their common stock, which continues to trade on The Nasdaq Global Select Market. In February of 2016 their shareholders approved a reverse stock split, to be implemented at the discretion of the Board. If they do effect a reverse stock split, the liquidity of Diana Containerships' common shares may be adversely affected given the reduced number of shares that will be outstanding following the reverse stock split. In the event they do not regain compliance within the 180-day grace period and they meet all other listing standards and requirements, they may be eligible for an additional 180-day grace period if they transfer to The Nasdaq Capital Market.
Our investment in Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited may expose us to additional risks.
During 2015 we invested in a 50/50 joint venture with Wilhelmsen Ship Management to provide management services to a limited number of vessels in our fleet, but our eventual goal is to provide fleet management services to unaffiliated third party vessel operators. While this joint venture may provide us in the future with a potential revenue source, it may also expose us to risks such as low customer satisfaction, increased operating costs compared to those we would achieve for our vessels, and inability to adequately staff our vessels with crew that meets our expectations or to maintain our vessels according to our standards, which would adversely affect our financial condition.
The Greek crisis could adversely affect the operations of our fleet manager, which has offices in Greece.
As a result of the ongoing economic slump in Greece and the capital controls imposed by the government in June 2015, Diana Shipping Services S.A., our manager which has offices in Greece, may be subjected to new regulations that may require us to incur new or additional compliance or other administrative costs and may require that we pay to the Greek government new taxes or other fees. Furthermore, renewed political uncertainty and social unrest due to the worsening economic conditions and the growing refugee population in the country may undermine Greece's political and economic stability and may lead it to exit the Eurozone, which may adversely affect the operations of our manager located in Greece. We also face the risk that enhanced capital controls, strikes, work stoppages, civil unrest and violence within Greece may disrupt the operations of our manager located in Greece.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspection of our independent accounting firm, could lead to findings in our auditors' reports and challenge the accuracy of our published audited consolidated financial statements.
Auditors of U.S. public companies are required by law to undergo periodic Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, inspections that assess their compliance with U.S. law and professional standards in connection with performance of audits of financial statements filed with the SEC. For several years certain European Union countries, including Greece, did not permit the PCAOB to conduct inspections of accounting firms established and operating in such European Union countries, even if they were part of major international firms. Accordingly, unlike for most U.S. public companies, the PCAOB was prevented from evaluating our auditor's performance of audits and its quality control procedures, and, unlike stockholders of most U.S. public companies, we and our stockholders were deprived of the possible benefits of such inspections. During 2015, Greece agreed to allow the PCAOB to conduct inspections of accounting firms operating in Greece. In the future, such PCAOB inspections could result in findings in our auditors' quality control procedures, question the validity of the auditor's reports on our published consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and cast doubt upon the accuracy of our published audited financial statements.
Our earnings and the payment of dividends, may be adversely affected if we are not able to take advantage of favorable charter rates.
We charter certain of our dry bulk carriers to customers pursuant to short-termshort term time charters that range in duration from 9 to 14 months.charters. However, as part of our business strategy, the majority of our vessels are currently fixed on long-termshort term time charters ranging in duration from 16 months to 62 months.charters. We may extend the charter periods for additional vessels in our fleet, including additional dry bulk carriers that we may purchase in the future, to take advantage of the relatively stable cash flow and high utilization rates that are associated with long-term time charters. While we believe that long-term charters provide us with relatively stable cash flows and higher utilization rates than shorter-term charters, our vessels that are committed to long-term charters may not be available for employment on short-term charters during periods of increasing short-term charter hire rates when these charters may be more profitable than long-term charters.
Investment in derivative instruments such as forward freight agreements could result in losses.
From time to time, we may take positions in derivative instruments including forward freight agreements, or FFAs. FFAs and other derivative instruments may be used to hedge a vessel owner's exposure to the charter market by providing for the sale of a contracted charter rate along a specified route and period of time. Upon settlement, if the contracted charter rate is less than the average of the rates, as reported by an identified index, for the specified route and period, the seller of the FFA is required to pay the buyer an amount equal to the difference between the contracted rate and the settlement rate, multiplied by the number of days in the specified period. Conversely, if the contracted rate is greater than the settlement rate, the buyer is required to pay the seller the settlement sum. If we take positions in FFAs or other derivative instruments and do not correctly anticipate charter rate movements over the specified route and time period, we could suffer losses in the settling or termination of the FFA. This could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.
Our board of directors decided to suspend the payment of cash dividends on our common stock. We cannot assure you that our board of directors will reinstate dividend payments in the future, or when such reinstatement might occur.
In order to position us to take advantage of market opportunities, in a deteriorating market our board of directors, beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008, has suspended our common stock dividend. Our dividend policy will be assessed by the board of directors from time to time. We believe that this suspension has enhanced our flexibility by permitting cash flow that would have been devoted to dividends to be used for opportunities that arise in the current marketplace, such as funding our operations, acquiring vessels or servicing our debt.
Our policy, historically, was to declare quarterly distributions to shareholders by each February, May, August and November substantially equal to our available cash from operations during the previous quarter after accounting for cash expenses and reserves for scheduled drydockings, intermediate and special surveys and other purposes as our board of directors may from time to time determine are required, and after taking into account contingent liabilities, the terms of our loan facilities, our growth strategy and other cash needs and the requirements of Marshall Islands law. The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will always be subject to the discretion of our board of directors. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial condition and cash requirements and availability, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing on acceptable terms as contemplated by our growth strategy and provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of dividends. In addition, other external factors, such as our lenders imposing restrictions on our ability to pay dividends under the terms of our loan facilities, may limit our ability to pay dividends. Further, we may not be permitted to pay dividends under the terms of our loan agreements, that would result in an event of default or if an event of default has occurred and is continuing.
Our growth strategy contemplates that we will finance the acquisition of additional vessels through a combination of debt and equity financing on terms acceptable to us. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms, our board of directors may determine to finance or refinance acquisitions with cash from operations, which could also reduce or even eliminate the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends.
Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend. We may not have sufficient surplus in the future to pay dividends. We can give no assurance that we will reinstate our dividends in the future or when such reinstatement might occur.
In addition, our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common shares will be subject to the rights of holders of our Series B Preferred Shares, which rank prior to our common shares with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation. No cash dividend may be paid on our common stock unless full cumulative dividends have been or contemporaneously are being paid or provided for on all outstanding Series B Preferred Shares for all prior and the then-ending dividend periods. Cumulative dividends on our Series B Preferred Shares accrue at a rate of 8.875% per annum per $25.00 stated liquidation preference per Series B Preferred Share, subject to increase upon the occurrence of certain events, and are payable, as and if declared by our board of directors, on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on April 15, 2014, or, if any such dividend payment date otherwise would fall on a date that is not a business day, the immediately succeeding business day. For additional information about our Series B Preferred Shares, please see the section entitled "Description of Registrant's Securities to be Registered" of our registration statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on February 13, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein.
We may have difficulty effectively managing our planned growth, which may adversely affect our earnings.
Since the completion of our initial public offering in March 2005, we have increased our fleet to 3745 vessels in operation, and we expect to take delivery of one newbuilding vessel in April 2014 and2016 of three newbuilding vessels in 2016.and one secondhand Panamax vessel. The addition of these vessels to our fleet has resulted in a significant increase in the size of our fleet and imposeshas imposed significant additional responsibilities on our management and staff. While we expect our fleet to grow further, this may require us to increase the number of our personnel. We will also have to increase our customer base to provide continued employment for the new vessels.
Our future growth will primarily depend on our ability to:
| · | locate and acquire suitable vessels; |
| · | identify and consummate acquisitions or joint ventures; |
| · | enhance our customer base; |
| · | manage our expansion; and |
| · | obtain required financing on acceptable terms. |
Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks, such as undisclosed liabilities and obligations, the possibility that indemnification agreements will be unenforceable or insufficient to cover potential losses and difficulties associated with imposing common standards, controls, procedures and policies, obtaining additional qualified personnel, managing relationships with customers and integrating newly acquired assets and operations into existing infrastructure. We cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in executing our growth plans or that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with our future growth.
Because the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is not currently permitted to inspect our independent accounting firm, you may not benefit from such inspections.
Auditors of U.S. public companies are required by law to undergo periodic Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections that assess their compliance with U.S. law and professional standards in connection with performance of audits of financial statements filed with the Commission. Certain European Union countries, including Greece, do not currently permit the PCAOB to conduct inspections of accounting firms established and operating in such European Union countries, even if they are part of major international firms. Accordingly, unlike for most U.S. public companies, the PCAOB is prevented from evaluating our auditor's performance of audits and its quality control procedures, and, unlike shareholders of most U.S. public companies, we and our shareholders are deprived of the possible benefits of such inspections.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to borrow amounts under our credit and loan facilities and restrictive covenants in our credit and loan facilities may impose financial and other restrictions on us.
Since February 2005 we have entered into several loan agreements to finance vessel acquisitions and the construction of newbuildings. As of December 31, 2013,2015, we had $433.1$605.9 million outstanding under our facilities.facilities and our Notes. Our ability to borrow amounts under our facilities is subject to the execution of customary documentation relating to the facility, including security documents, satisfaction of certain customary conditions precedent and compliance with terms and conditions included in the loan documents. Prior to each drawdown, we are required, among other things, to provide the lender with acceptable valuations of the vessels in our fleet confirming that the vessels in our fleet have a minimum value and that the vessels in our fleet that secure our obligations under the facilities are sufficient to satisfy minimum security requirements. To the extent that we are not able to satisfy these requirements, including as a result of a decline in the value of our vessels, we may not be able to draw down the full amount under the facilities without obtaining a waiver or consent from the lender. We will also not be permitted to borrow amounts under the facilities if we experience a change of control.
The credit and loan facilities also impose operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions may limit our ability to, among other things:
| · | pay dividends or make capital expenditures if we do not repay amounts drawn under our loan facilities, if there is a default under the loan facilities or if the payment of the dividend or capital expenditure would result in a default or breach of a loan covenant; |
| · | incur additional indebtedness, including through the issuance of guarantees; |
| · | change the flag, class or management of our vessels; |
| · | create liens on our assets; |
| · | enter into a time charter or consecutive voyage charters that have a term that exceeds, or which by virtue of any optional extensions may exceed a certain period; |
| · | merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or substantially all our assets to, another person; and |
| · | enter into a new line of business. |
Therefore, we may need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in some corporate actions. Our lenders' interests may be different from ours and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain our lenders' permission when needed. This may limit our ability to finance our future operations, make acquisitions or pursue business opportunities.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance indebtedness incurred under our loan facilities.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance indebtedness with equity offerings on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. If we are not able to refinance these amounts with the net proceeds of equity offerings on terms acceptable to us or at all, we will have to dedicate a greater portion of our cash flow from operations to pay the principal and interest of this indebtedness than if we were able to refinance such amounts. If we are not able to satisfy these obligations, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans. The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, any defaults by them, and the market value of our fleet, among other things, may materially affect our ability to obtain alternative financing. In addition, debt service payments under our loan facilities or alternative financing may limit funds otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures and other purposes. If we are unable to meet our debt obligations, or if we otherwise default under our loan facilities or an alternative financing arrangement, our lenders could declare the debt, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on our fleet, which could result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have at such time and the commencement of similar foreclosure proceedings by other lenders.
Purchasing and operating secondhand vessels may result in increased operating costs and reduced operating days.
While we have the right to inspect previously owned vessels prior to our purchase of them and we usually inspect secondhand vessels that we acquire, such inspections do not provide us with the same knowledge about their condition that we would have if these vessels had been built for, and operated exclusively by, us. A secondhand vessel may have conditions or defects that we were not aware of when we bought the vessel and which may require us to incur costly repairs to the vessel. These repairs may require us to put a vessel into drydock, which would reduce our operating days. Furthermore, we usually do not receive the benefit of warranties on secondhand vessels.
We are subject to certain risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts, and failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to suffer losses or otherwise adversely affect our business.
We enter into, among other things, charter parties with our customers. Such agreements subject us to counterparty risks. The ability and willingness of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the maritime and offshore industries, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for specific types of vessels, and various expenses. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, we could sustain significant losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, in depressed market conditions, our charterers may no longer need a vessel that is currently under charter or may be able to obtain a comparable vessel at lower rates. As a result, charterers may seek to renegotiate the terms of their existing charter partiesagreements or avoid their obligations under those contracts. Should a counterpartyIf our charterers fail to honor itsmeet their obligations underto us or attempt to renegotiate our charter agreements, with us,it may be difficult to secure substitute employment for such vessels, and any new charter arrangements we secure may be at lower rates given currently decreased drybulk carrier charter rate levels. As a result, we could sustain significant losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In the highly competitive international shipping industry, we may not be able to compete for charters with new entrants or established companies with greater resources, and as a result, we may be unable to employ our vessels profitably.
We employ our vessels in a highly competitive market that is capital intensive and highly fragmented. Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, some of whom have substantially greater resources than we do. Competition for the transportation of dry bulk cargo by sea is intense and depends on price, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of the vessel and its operators to the charterers. Due in part to the highly fragmented market, competitors with greater resources than us could enter the dry bulk shipping industry and operate larger fleets through consolidations or acquisitions and may be able to offer lower charter rates and higher quality vessels than we are able to offer. If we are unable to successfully compete with other dry bulk shipping companies, our results of operations may be adversely impacted.
We may be unable to attract and retain key management personnel and other employees in the shipping industry, which may negatively impact the effectiveness of our management and results of operations.
Our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and efforts of our management team. We have entered into employment contracts with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, Mr. Simeon Palios; our President, Mr. Anastasios Margaronis; our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Andreas Michalopoulos; and our Executive Vice President,Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Ioannis Zafirakis. Our success will depend upon our ability to retain key members of our management team and to hire new members as may be necessary. The loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect our business prospects and financial condition. Difficulty in hiring and retaining replacement personnel could have a similar effect. We do not currently, nor do we intend to, maintain "key man" life insurance on any of our officers or other members of our management team.
The fiduciary duties of our officers and directors may conflict with those of the officers and directors of Diana Containerships.
Certain of our officers and directors are officers and directors of Diana Containerships and have fiduciary duties to manage our business in a manner beneficial to us and our shareholders, as well as a duty to the shareholders of Diana Containerships. Consequently, these officers and directors may encounter situations in which their fiduciary obligations to Diana Containerships and to us are in conflict. The resolution of these conflicts may not always be in our best interest or that of our shareholders and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Risks associated with operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation, which could adversely affect our revenues and stock price.
The operation of ocean-going vessels carries inherent risks. These risks include the possibility of:
| · | environmental accidents; |
| · | cargo and property losses or damage; |
| · | business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, war, terrorism, political action in various countries, labor strikes or adverse weather conditions; and |
These hazards may result in death or injury to persons, loss of revenues or property, environmental damage, higher insurance rates, damage to our customer relationships, delay or rerouting. If our vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a drydocking facility. The costs of drydock repairs are unpredictable and may be substantial. We may have to pay drydocking costs that our insurance does not cover in full. The loss of earnings while these vessels are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, would decrease our earnings. In addition, space at drydocking facilities is sometimes limited and not all drydocking facilities are conveniently located. We may be unable to find space at a suitable drydocking facility or our vessels may be forced to travel to a drydocking facility that is not conveniently located to our vessels' positions. The loss of earnings while these vessels are forced to wait for space or to steam to more distant drydocking facilities would decrease our earnings. The involvement of our vessels in an environmental disaster may also harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator.
We may not have adequate insurance to compensate us if we lose our vessels or to compensate third parties.
We procure insurance for our fleet against risks commonly insured against by vessel owners and operators. Our current insurance includes hull and machinery insurance, war risks insurance and protection and indemnity insurance (which includes environmental damage and pollution insurance). We can give no assurance that we are adequately insured against all risks or that our insurers will pay a particular claim. Even if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to timely obtain a replacement vessel in the event of a loss. Furthermore, in the future, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates for our fleet. We may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage for tort liability. Our insurance policies also contain deductibles, limitations and exclusions which, although we believe are standard in the shipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs.
Our vessels may suffer damage and we may face unexpected drydocking costs, which could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition.
If our vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a drydocking facility. The costs of drydock repairs are unpredictable and can be substantial. The loss of earnings while a vessel is being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs not covered by our insurance, would decrease our earnings and cash available for dividends, if declared. We may not have insurance that is sufficient to cover all or any of the costs or losses for damages to our vessels and may have to pay drydocking costs not covered by our insurance.
The aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in the future, which could adversely affect our earnings.
In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with the age of the vessel. Currently, our fleet consists of 3745 vessels in operation, having a combined carrying capacity of 4.25.2 million dead weight tons, (dwt)or dwt, and a weighted average age of 6.77.5 years as of March 27, 2014 and28, 2016. Additionally, we have shipbuilding contracts for the construction of fourthree additional vessels.vessels and expect to take delivery of one secondhand vessel in April 2016. As our fleet ages, we will incur increased costs. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Cargo insurance rates increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations and safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may also require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may engage. We cannot assure you that, as our vessels age, market conditions will justify those expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives.
We are exposed to U.S. dollar and foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations that could harm our reported revenue and results of operations.
We generate all of our revenues in U.S. dollars but currently incur around half of our operating expenses and around 40% of our general and administrative expenses in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro. Because a significant portion of our expenses is incurred in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, our expenses may from time to time increase relative to our revenues as a result of fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly between the U.S. dollar and the Euro, which could affect the amount of net income that we report in future periods. While we historically have not mitigated the risk associated with exchange rate fluctuations through the use of financial derivatives, we may employ such instruments from time to time in the future in order to minimize this risk. Our use of financial derivatives would involve certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedged position could exceed the nominal amount invested in the instrument and the risk that the counterparty to the derivative transaction may be unable or unwilling to satisfy its contractual obligations, which could have an adverse effect on our results.
Volatility in LIBOR could affect our profitability, earnings and cash flow.
LIBOR may be volatile, with the spread between LIBOR and the prime lending rate widening significantly at times. These conditions are the result of disruptions in the international markets. Because the interest rates borne by our outstanding indebtednessloan facilities fluctuate with changes in LIBOR, it would affect the amount of interest payable on our debt, which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our profitability, earnings and cash flow.
We depend upon a few significant customers for a large part of our revenues and the loss of one or more of these customers could adversely affect our financial performance.
We have historically derived a significant part of our revenues from a small number of charterers. During 2015, 2014, and 2013, approximately 66%, 55% and 58%, respectively, of our revenues derived from four charterers. During 2012, approximately 40% of our revenues derived from three charterers. During 2011, approximately 41% of our revenues derived from three charterers. If one or more of our charterers chooses not to charter our vessels or is unable to perform under one or more charters with us and we are not able to find a replacement charter, we could suffer a loss of revenues that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We are a holding company, and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations.
We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to satisfy our financial obligations depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we may not be able to satisfy our financial obligations.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Our board of directors decided to suspend the payment of cash dividends on our common stock. We cannot assure you that our board of directors will reinstate dividend payments in the future, or when such reinstatement might occur.
In order to position us to take advantage of market opportunities in a deteriorating market, our board of directors, beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008, has suspended our common stock dividend. Our dividend policy will be assessed by the board of directors from time to time. We believe that this suspension has enhanced our flexibility by permitting cash flow that would have been devoted to dividends to be used for opportunities that arise in the current marketplace, such as funding our operations, acquiring vessels or servicing our debt.
Our policy, historically, was to declare quarterly distributions to shareholders by each February, May, August and November substantially equal to our available cash from operations during the previous quarter after accounting for cash expenses and reserves for scheduled drydockings, intermediate and special surveys and other purposes as our board of directors may from time to time determine are required, and after taking into account contingent liabilities, the terms of our loan facilities, our growth strategy and other cash needs and the requirements of Marshall Islands law. The declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will always be subject to the discretion of our board of directors. The timing and amount of any dividends declared will depend on, among other things, our earnings, financial condition and cash requirements and availability, our ability to obtain debt and equity financing on acceptable terms as contemplated by our growth strategy and provisions of Marshall Islands law affecting the payment of dividends. In addition, other external factors, such as our lenders imposing restrictions on our ability to pay dividends under the terms of our loan facilities, may limit our ability to pay dividends. Further, under the terms of our loan agreements, we may not be permitted to pay dividends that would result in an event of default or if an event of default has occurred and is continuing.
Our growth strategy contemplates that we will finance the acquisition of additional vessels through a combination of debt and equity financing on terms acceptable to us. If financing is not available to us on acceptable terms, our board of directors may determine to finance or refinance acquisitions with cash from operations, which could also reduce or even eliminate the amount of cash available for the payment of dividends.
Marshall Islands law generally prohibits the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares) or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend. We may not have sufficient surplus in the future to pay dividends. We can give no assurance that we will reinstate our dividends in the future or when such reinstatement might occur.
In addition, our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common shares will be subject to the rights of holders of our Series B Preferred Shares, which rank prior to our common shares with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation. No cash dividend may be paid on our common stock unless full cumulative dividends have been or contemporaneously are being paid or provided for on all outstanding Series B Preferred Shares for all prior and the then-ending dividend periods. Cumulative dividends on our Series B Preferred Shares accrue at a rate of 8.875% per annum per $25.00 stated liquidation preference per Series B Preferred Share, subject to increase upon the occurrence of certain events, and are payable, as and if declared by our board of directors, on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year, or, if any such dividend payment date otherwise would fall on a date that is not a business day, the immediately succeeding business day. For additional information about our Series B Preferred Shares, please see the section entitled "Description of Registrant's Securities to be Registered" of our registration statement on Form 8-A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein.
There is no guarantee that there will continue to be an active and liquid public market for you to resell our common stock in the future.
The price of our common stock may be volatile and may fluctuate due to factors such as:
| · | actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results and those of other public companies in our industry; |
| · | mergers and strategic alliances in the dry bulk shipping industry; |
| · | market conditions in the dry bulk shipping industry; |
| · | changes in government regulation; |
| · | shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecast by securities analysts; |
| · | announcements concerning us or our competitors; and |
| · | the general state of the securities market. |
The dry bulk shipping industry has been highly unpredictable and volatile. The market for common stock in this industry may be equally volatile.
Since we are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law, you may have more difficulty protecting your interests than shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act, or the BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the laws of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the United States. The rights of shareholders of the Marshall Islands may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the United States. While the BCA provides that it is to be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the BCA in the Marshall Islands and we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as United StatesU.S. courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United StatesU.S. jurisdiction which has developed a relatively more substantial body of case law.
Certain existing shareholders will be able to exert considerable control over matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote.
As of the date of this annual report Mr. Simeon Palios, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, beneficially owns 15,442,01318,823,331 shares, or approximately 18.5%22.2% of our outstanding common stock, the vast majority of which is held indirectly through entities over which he exercises sole voting power. Please see "Item 7.A. Major Shareholders." While Mr. Palios and the non-voting shareholders of these entities have no agreement, arrangement or understanding relating to the voting of their shares of our common stock, they are able to influence the outcome of matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote, including the election of directors and other significant corporate actions. The interests of these shareholders may be different from your interests.
Future sales of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, may depress the market price for our common stock. These sales could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities in the future.
Our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize us to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, of which as of December 31, 2013, 82,841,3702015, 82,546,017 shares were outstanding. The number of shares of common stock available for sale in the public market is limited by restrictions applicable under securities laws and agreements that we and our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders have entered into.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could make it difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current board of directors or have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Several provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our shareholders to change the composition of our board of directors in any one year, preventing them from changing the composition of management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable.
These provisions include:
| · | authorizing our board of directors to issue "blank check" preferred stock without shareholder approval; |
| · | providing for a classified board of directors with staggered, three year terms; |
| · | prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
| · | authorizing the removal of directors only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote for the directors; |
| · | prohibiting shareholder action by written consent; |
| · | limiting the persons who may call special meetings of shareholders; and |
| ·● | establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder meetings. |
In addition, we have adopted a shareholder rights planStockholders Rights Agreement, dated January 15, 2016, pursuant to which our board of directors may cause the substantial dilution of any person that attempts to acquire us without the approval of our board of directors.
These anti-takeover provisions, including provisions of our shareholder rights plan,Stockholders Rights Agreement, could substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Our Series B Preferred Shares are senior obligations of ours and rank prior to our common shares with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation, which could have an adverse effect on the value of our common shares.
We may not have sufficient cash from our operations to enable us to pay dividends on our Series B Preferred Shares following the payment of expenses and the establishment of any reserves.
The amount of cash we have available for dividends on our Series B Preferred Shares will not depend solely
on our profitability. The actual amount of cash we will have available to pay dividends on our Series B Preferred Shares will dependdepends on many factors, including the following:
The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ materially from our net income or loss for the period, which will beis affected by noncash items, and our board of directors in its discretion may elect not to declare any dividends. As a result of these and the other factors mentioned above, we may pay dividends during periods when we record losses and may not pay dividends during periods when we record net income.
The Series B Preferred Shares represent perpetual equity interests.
The Series B Preferred Shares represent perpetual equity interests in us and, unlike our indebtedness, will not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. As a result, holders of the Series B Preferred Shares may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment in the Series B Preferred Shares for an indefinite period of time. In addition, the Series B Preferred Shares will rank junior to all our indebtedness and other liabilities, and to any other senior securities we may issue in the future with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against us.
We may redeem the Series B Preferred Shares, and you may not be able to reinvest the redemption price you receive in a similar security.
On or after February 14, 2019, we may, at our option, redeem Series B Preferred Shares, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time. We may have an incentive to redeem Series B Preferred Shares voluntarily if market conditions allow us to issue other preferred shares or debt securities at a rate that is lower than the dividend on the Series B Preferred Shares. If we redeem Series B Preferred Shares, then from and after the redemption date, your dividends will cease to accrue on your Series B Preferred Shares, your Series B Preferred Shares shall no longer be deemed outstanding and all your rights as a holder of those shares will terminate, except the right to receive the redemption price plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if any, payable upon redemption. If we redeem the Series B Preferred Shares for any reason, you may not be able to reinvest the redemption price you receive in a similar security.
Market interest rates may adversely affect the value of our Series B Preferred Shares.
As a holder of Series B Preferred Shares you have extremely limited voting rights.
Our ability to pay dividends on and to redeem our Series B Preferred Shares is limited by the requirements of Marshall Islands law.
Marshall Islands law provides that we may pay dividends on and redeem the Series B Preferred Shares only to the extent that assets are legally available for such purposes. Legally available assets generally are limited to our surplus, which essentially represents our retained earnings and the excess of consideration received by us for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares. In addition, under Marshall Islands law we may not pay dividends on or redeem Series B Preferred Shares if we are insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend or the making of such redemption.
The amount of your liquidation preference is fixed and you will have no right to receive any greater payment regardless of the circumstances.
The payment due upon a liquidation is fixed at the redemption preference of $25.00 per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of liquidation. If, in the case of our liquidation, there are remaining assets to be distributed after payment of this amount, you will have no right to receive or to participate in these amounts. Furthermore, if the market price for your Series B Preferred Shares is greater than the liquidation preference, you will have no right to receive the market price from us upon our liquidation.
Item 4. Item 4. | Information on the Company |
A. | A. | History and development of the Company |
Diana Shipping Inc. is a holding company incorporated under the laws of Liberia in March 1999 as Diana Shipping Investments Corp. In February 2005, the Company's articles of incorporation were amended. Under the amended and restated articles of incorporation, the Company was renamed Diana Shipping Inc. and was redomiciledre-domiciled from the Republic of Liberia to the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Our executive offices are located at Pendelis 16, 175 64 Palaio Faliro, Athens, Greece. Our telephone number at this address is +30-210-947-0100. Our agent and authorized representative in the United States is our wholly-owned subsidiary, Bulk Carriers (USA) LLC, established in September 2006, in the State of Delaware, which is located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808.
Business Development and Capital Expenditures and Divestitures
In May 2011, we acquired Arethusa, a 73,593 dwt Panamax dry bulk carrier, built in 2007, for $30.0 million, which was delivered to us in July 2011. Part of the purchase price of the vessel was financed through the $15.0 million loan facility that our wholly owned subsidiary, Bikar Shipping Company Inc., entered into in September 2011 with Emporiki Bank of Greece S.A. which in December 2012, was transferred to Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank.
In June 2011, concurrently with a public offering of Diana Containerships' common shares, we acquired 2,666,667 shares of Diana Containerships' common stock at the price of $7.50 per share, for a total amount of $20.0 million. We currently own 9.51% of Diana Containership's outstanding shares.
In November 2011, we acquired Leto, an 81,297 dwt Panamax dry bulk carrier, built in 2010, for $32.3 million, which was delivered to us in January 2012. The purchase price of the vessel was partly financed with the proceeds from the loan agreement with Nordea Bank Finland Plc that our wholly owned subsidiary, Jemo Shipping Company Inc., entered into in February 2012.
In December 2011, we entered into an agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (the "Broker") to repurchase our stock according to Rule 10b5-1(c)(l) and to the extend applicable to Rule 10b-18 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The agreement was terminated on February 29, 2012. On June 14 and August 2, 2012, we entered into two similar agreements which were terminated on July 11 and October 15, 2012, respectively. We repurchased and retired 154,091 shares up to December 31, 2011 for an aggregate cost of $1.2 million, and an additional 853,607 shares in 2012 for an additional cost of $6.0 million.
In March 2012, we entered into, through two of our wholly owned subsidiaries, shipbuilding contracts with China Shipbuilding Trading Company, Limited and Jiangnan Shipyard (Group) Co., Ltd, for the construction of two 76,000 dwt ice class Panamax dry bulk carriers for the contract price of $29.0 million each. One of the vessels, the Crystalia, was delivered on February 20, 2014 and the other vessel to be namedthe Atalandi, is expected to bewas delivered in the second quarter ofon May 12, 2014.
In June 2012, the agreement between Jemo Shipping Company Inc. and Nordea Bank Finland Plc was restated and amended by a supplemental agreement in order to include our wholly owned subsidiary, Mandaringina Inc., as a new borrower and increase the loan amount to up to $26.5 million for the purpose of financing part of the acquisition cost of the Melia.
In December 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiaries Palau Shipping Company Inc. and Guam Shipping Company Inc. entered into a new agreement with Nordea Bank Finland Plc for a term loan facility of $20.0 million, to finance part of the acquisition cost of vessels Amphitrite and Polymnia.
In 2012, we acquired the Melia, a 76,225 dwt Panamax dry bulk carrier, built in 2005, for $20.7 million, delivered in May 2012; the Amphitrite, a 98,697 dwt new built Post-Panamax dry bulk carrier, for $25.0 million, delivered in August 2012; the Polymnia, a 98,704 dwt new built Post-Panamax dry bulk carrier, for $24.6 million, delivered in November 2012; and we also entered into an agreement to acquire the Myrto, an 82,131 dwt Kamsarmax newbuilding dry bulk carrier, for $26.5 million, which was built and delivered to us in January 2013.
On February 19, 2013, we took delivery of the MaiaMyrto,, an 82,193 dwt a 2013 built Kamsarmax dry bulk carrier, which we acquired for $26.5 million, the Maia, a 2009 built in 2009,Kamsarmax dry bulk carrier, which we acquired at an auction for $19.8$19.7 million; the Baltimore, a 2005 built Capesize dry bulk carrier, which we acquired for $26.8 million; the Artemis, a 2006 built Panamax dry bulk carrier, which we acquired for $20.2 million; the Myrsini, a 2010 built Kamsarmax dry bulk vessel, which we acquired in a bid offer for $22.7 million; and the P.S. Palios, a 2013 built Capesize dry bulk vessel, which we acquired for $52.0 million.
On May 17, 2013, we entered, through two separate wholly owned subsidiaries, into two shipbuilding contracts with China Shipbuilding Trading Company, Limited and Jiangnan Shipyard (Group) Co., Ltd. for the construction of two Newcastlemax dry bulk vessels of approximately 208,500 dwt for a contract price of $48.7 million each. We expect to take delivery of the two vessels in 2016.
On May 20, 2013, we entered into a loan agreement with Eluk Shipping Company Inc., a subsidiary of Diana Containerships, to provide to it an unsecured loan of up to $50.0 million, the drawdown of which was completed on August 20, 2013. On September 9, 2015, the agreement was amended, pursuant to which the loan matures on March 15, 2022; bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 3% per annum; the back-end fee accumulated up to and became payable on the date of the amendment; and the borrowers will pay to the lender a fee of $200 on the maturity date. In addition, the borrowers agreed to repay the principal amount of the loan on the last day of each interest period in amounts of $5.0 million per annum, but not to exceed $32.5 million in the aggregate. The loan is subordinated to Diana Containerships' loan with the Royal Bank of Scotland.
On May 24, 2013, we entered into, through two separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, a term loan facility for up to $30.0$30.0 million with The Export-Import Bank of China having a majority interest and DNB Bank ASA, as agent, to partly finance, after delivery, the construction cost of our two newbuilding Ice Class Panamax dry bulk carriers, named Crystalia and to be named Atalandi., which we drew down on May 22, 2014.
On June 13, 2013, we took delivery of the Baltimore, a 2005 built Capesize dry bulk carrier of 177,243 dwt, which we acquired for $26.8 million.
On June 18, 2013, we signed, through two separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, a term loan facility for up to $18.0 million with Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft Filiale Deutschlandgeschäft, or Deutsche Bank, and on June 20, 2013, we completed the drawdown of $18.0 million in order to partially finance the acquisition costs of the two Kamsarmax dry bulk carriers, the Myrto and the Maia, both delivered earlier in 2013. On the same date, our wholly owned subsidiary, Bikini Shipping Company Inc., entered into a supplemental agreement with Deutsche Bank in order to amend the terms of its loan agreement dated October 9,8, 2009 with respect to the cross collateralization of the "New York"New York with "Maia"Maia and "Myrto"Myrto. The agreement between Deutsche Bank and Bikini was terminated on March 10, 2015 following full repayment of the outstanding loan balance and on March 20, 2015, we prepaid the outstanding indebtedness under the loan agreement for Myrto and Maia, of $15.8 million.
On August 8, 2013, Diana Shipping Services S.A., or DSS, our wholly-owned subsidiary, was found guilty on felony counts and on December 5, 2013 was sentenced by the United States District Court in Norfolk, Virginia to a fine of $1.1 million, of which $850,000 has been paid and the balance is due to be paid within six months of the date of the sentence,was fully settled in two installments, and a period of probation of three years and six months, as a result of a conviction in which DSS was held vicariously liable for the actions of the chief engineer and second assistant engineer of the Thetis, who were found guilty by the Court of violating several U.S. statutes and regulations in failing to properly handle waste oils, maintain required records and for obstruction of justice. In addition, the sentence includes a requirement to maintain an enhanced system subject to independent audit for managing waste oils on vessels managed by DSS.
On August 26, 2013, we took delivery of the Artemis, a 2006 built Panamax dry bulk carrier of 76,942 dwt, which we acquired for $20.3 million.
On October 10, 2013, we took delivery of the Myrsini, a 2010 built Kamsarmax dry bulk vessel of 82,117 dwt, which we acquired in a bid offer for $22.7 million.
On November 26, 2013, the charterers of the Houston terminated the charter earlier than the termination date determined under the terms of the charter party and redelivered the vessel. We have commencedwere awarded damages in arbitration proceedings against the charterers seeking to mitigaterecover the losses resulting from the earlierearly termination. This earlier termination also resultedFollowing the publication of the award, the charterers filed for a creditors' voluntary liquidation in Hong Kong and we have filed our claim in the full amortization of the unamortized balance of prepaid charter revenue, amounting to $5.3 millionliquidation in 2013, which would otherwise be amortized to revenue over the remaining period of the charter.
On December 2, 2013, we took delivery of the P.S. Palios, a 2013 built Capesize dry bulk vessel of 179,134 dwt, which we acquired for $52.0 millionHong Kong.
On January 8, 2014, we entered, through a separate wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, into a shipbuilding contract with Yangzhou Dayang Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Sinopacific International Trade Co., Ltd., and since April 21, 2014 with Sumec Marine Co., Ltd., pursuant to an addendum, for the construction of a Kamsarmax dry bulk vessel of approximately 82,000 dwt for a contract price of $28.8 million. We expect to take delivery of the vessel in 2016.
On January 9, 2014, we entered into, through two separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, a term loan facility for up to $18.0 million with Commonwealth Bank of Australia to partially finance the acquisition costs of two Panamax dry bulk vessels, the Melite and the Artemis,, which were delivered on January 28, 2010 and August 26, 2013, respectively, and we completed the drawdown of $18.0 million on January 13, 2014.
On February 24, 2014, we completed a public offering of 2,600,000 shares of 8.875% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares, par value $0.01 per share at $25.00 per share. We received net proceeds from the offering of $63.0$62.7 million, net of underwriting discount.discount and offering expenses.
On May 22, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase plan for up to $100 million of our common shares of which, up to January 30, 2015, we repurchased and retired 3,259,353 shares at the aggregate cost of $28.0 million and an average price of $8.6 per share. We intendhave not repurchased any other shares since January 30, 2015.
In 2014, we, through two separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, acquired from unaffiliated third parties the G. P. Zafirakis, a new-building Capesize dry bulk vessel, for a purchase price of $58.0 million, which was delivered in August 2014 and the Santa Barbara, a new-building Capesize dry bulk vessel, for a purchase price of $50.0 million, which was delivered in January 2015.
On July 29, 2014, we purchased 15,936,255 shares of the common stock of Diana Containerships for an aggregate purchase price of $40.0 million.
On December 18, 2014, we entered into, through two separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, a term loan facility for up to use$55.0 million with BNP Paribas to finance part of the net proceedsacquisition cost of the G. P. Zafirakis and P. S. Palios. We completed the drawdown of $53.5 million on December 19, 2014.
In December 2014, DSS acquired jointly with two other related entities, from unrelated individuals, a plot of land for an aggregate purchase price of €2.0 million or $2.5 million (based on the exchange rate of U.S. Dollars to Euro as of the date of acquisition). DSS paid one third of the purchase price amounting to $0.9 million, including additional purchase costs incurred. The plot is under the common ownership of the joint purchasers.
On March 17, 2015, we entered into, through eight separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, a term loan facility of up to $110.0 million with Nordea Bank AB, London Branch, or Nordea, to refinance the existing agreements we had with the bank for working capital and general corporate purposes,purposes. We completed the drawdown of $93.1 million on March 19, 2015 and we fully repaid all outstanding indebtedness with the bank at that date.
On March 26, 2015, we entered into, through three wholly-owned subsidiaries, a loan agreement with ABN AMRO Bank N.V. for up to $53.0 million to refinance part of the acquisition cost of the vessels New York, Myrto and Maia. On March 30, 2015, we drew down the amount of $50.16 million under the loan facility.
On April 20, 2015, we entered into, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, an agreement to acquire from an unrelated third party a new-building Capesize dry bulk vessel, named New Orleans, for a purchase price of $43.0 million. The vessel was delivered on November 10, 2015.
On April 27, 2015, we entered into, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a memorandum of agreement with an unrelated third party to acquire a Kamsarmax dry bulk vessel, renamed to Medusa, for a purchase price of $18.05 million. The vessel was delivered in June 2015.
On April 29, 2015, we entered into, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a loan agreement with Danish Ship Finance A/S for a loan facility of $30.0 million, drawn on April 30, 2015 to partly finance the acquisition cost of the Santa Barbara.
On May 20, 2015, we offered $63.3 million aggregate principal amount of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2020 (the "Notes"), including an overallotment, at the repaymentprice of debt$25.0 per Note. As part of the offering, the underwriters sold $12.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes to, or to entities affiliated with, the Company's chief executive officer, Mr. Simeon Palios, and other executive officers and certain directors of the Company at the public offering price. As of May 29, 2015, the Notes are trading on the NYSE under the ticker symbol "DSXN". The Notes bear interest from May 28, 2015 at a rate of 8.5% per year and will mature on May 15, 2020. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears on the 15th day of February, May, August and November of each year, commencing on August 15, 2015. The Company may redeem the Notes at its option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2017 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. The Notes include financial and other covenants, including maximum net borrowings and minimum tangible net worth.
On May 7, 2015, our wholly owned subsidiary Diana Ship Management Inc. and Wilhelmsen Ship Management Holding Limited, an unaffiliated third party, established Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited, or DWM, a 50/50 joint venture, with the purpose of providing management services to a number of vessels in our fleet. The DWM office is located in Limassol, Cyprus and currently it provides services to six of our vessels.
On July 22, 2015, we entered into a loan agreement with BNP Paribas for a loan of $165.0 million, drawn on July 24, 2015 to refinance the revolving credit facility with the Royal Bank of Scotland. In this respect, the revolving credit facility, having an outstanding balance of $195.0 million, was voluntarily prepaid in full and the related agreement was terminated.
On September 30, 2015, we entered into, through two wholly-owned subsidiaries, a term loan agreement with ING Bank N.V. for a loan of up to $39.7 million, drawn in two tranches, one in October 2015 and one in November 2015, to finance part of the acquisition cost of the Medusa and the New Orleans, delivered in June and November 2015 respectively.
On November 2, 2015, we entered into, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, a memorandum of agreement with an unrelated third party to acquire a Capesize dry bulk vessel, named Seattle, for a purchase price of $28.5 million, which was delivered in November 2015.
On January 7, 2016, we entered into, through the three wholly-owned subsidiaries with vessels under construction, a loan agreement with the Export-Import Bank of China for a loan of up to $75.7 million to finance part of the construction cost of these vessels. The loan will be available for drawdown until March 12, 2017, or such later date as all the lenders may in their discretion agree and will mature by March 2032 at the latest.
On February 4, 2016, we entered into, through three separate wholly-owned subsidiaries, three Memoranda of Agreement to acquire from a related party three Panamax vessels for an aggregate purchase price of $39.8 million, reduced to $39.3 million pursuant to addendum agreements dated March 4, 2016. Two of the vessels were delivered in March 2016 and the third vessel is expected to be delivered in April 2016. The Company has agreed to acquire the vessels from entities affiliated with Mrs. Semiramis Paliou and Mrs. Aliki Paliou, each of whom is a family member of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Mrs. Semiramis Paliou is also a director of the Company. The transaction was approved unanimously by a committee of the Board of Directors established for the purpose of considering the transaction and consisting of the Company's independent directors and each of its executive directors other than Mrs. Semiramis Paliou and Mr. Simeon Palios. The agreed upon purchase price of the vessels was based, among other factors, on independent third party broker valuations obtained by the Company. Consummation of the purchases is subject to the Company obtaining bank financing from the sellers' existing lenders for substantially the entire purchase price of the vessels, thereby resulting in little or no current cash outlay on the part of the Company.
On March 11, 2016, we signed, through two wholly-owned subsidiaries, a commitment letter with ABN AMRO Bank N.V. for a loan of up to $25.8 million to finance the acquisition cost of two of the three Panamax vessels mentioned above.
Please see "Item 5.B Liquidity and Capital Resources" for a discussion of our loan facilities.
B.Business overview
We are a global provider of shipping transportation services. We specialize in transportingthe ownership of dry bulk cargoes, including such commodities as iron ore, coal, grain and other materials along worldwide shipping routes.vessels. Currently, our operating fleet consists of 3745 dry bulk carriers, of which 1922 are Panamax, threefour are Kamsarmax, three are Post-Panamax ten, 14 are Capesize and two are Newcastlemax vessels, having a combined carrying capacity of approximately 4.25.2 million dwt. In addition, in 2016, we expect to take delivery of fourthree vessels under construction and one in the second quartersecondhand vessel we agreed to acquire from a related party.
As of 2014December 31, 2015, our fleet consisted of 43 vessels of which 20 Panamax, four Kamsarmax, three Post-Panamax, 14 Capesize and two Newcastlemax vessels, having a combined carrying capacity of approximately 5.0 million dwt, and a weighted average age of 7.4 years. In addition, we had three vessels under construction with expected delivery in 2016.
As of December 31, 2014, our fleet consisted of 39 vessels of which 20 Panamax, three Kamsarmax, three Post-Panamax, eleven Capesize and two Newcastlemax vessels, having a combined carrying capacity of approximately 4.4 million dwt, and a weighted average age of 7.1 years. In addition, we had three vessels under construction with expected delivery in 2016 and we had agreed to acquire Santa Barbara, which was delivered in January 2015.
As of December 31, 2013, our fleet consisted of 36 vessels of which 18 Panamax, three Kamsarmax, three Post-Panamax, ten Capesize and two Newcastlemax vessels, having a combined carrying capacity of approximately 4.1 million dwt, and a weighted average age of 6.6 years, excluding four vessels we had under construction.
As of December 31, 2012, our fleet consisted of 30 vessels of which 17 Panamax, three Post-Panamax, eight CapesizeDuring 2015, 2014 and two Newcastlemax vessels, having a combined carrying capacity of approximately 3.4 million dwt, and a weighted average age of 6.0 years, excluding two vessels under construction and the Myrto which was delivered in January 2013.
During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we had a fleet utilization of 99.3%, 98.7%99.4% and 99.3%, respectively, our vessels achieved daily time charter equivalent rates of $12,959, $21,255$9,739, $12,081 and $28,920,$12,959, respectively, and we generated revenues of $164.0$157.7 million, $220.8$175.6 million and $255.7$164.0 million, respectively.
The following table presents certain information concerning the dry bulk carriers in our fleet, as of March 27, 2014.28, 2016.
| Vessel | Sister Ships* | Gross Rate (USD Per Day) | Com** | Charterers | Delivery Date to Charterers*** | Redelivery Date to Owners**** | Notes |
| BUILT DWT |
| 23 Panamax Bulk Carriers |
| | | | | | | | |
1 | DANAE | A | $4,900 | 5.00% | Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S, Copenhagen | 9-Dec-15 | 9-Nov-16 - 9-Mar-17 | |
| 2001 75,106 | | | | | | | |
2 | DIONE | A | $9,250 | 5.00% | RWE Supply & Trading GmbH, Essen | 12-Sep-14 | 8-Jan-16 | 1 |
| | | $4,350 | 5.00% | Nidera S.P.A., Roma | 4-Feb-16 | 20-Jan-17 - 4-May-17 | |
| 2001 75,172 | | | | | | | |
3 | NIREFS | A | $7,500 | 5.00% | Glencore Grain B.V., Rotterdam | 25-Dec-14 | 12-Jan-16 | |
| | | $4,600 | 5.00% | Transgrain Shipping B.V., Rotterdam | 15-Jan-16 | 15-Dec-16 - 30-Mar-17 | |
| 2001 75,311 | | | | | | | |