Table of Contents

______________ 

* Common shares held in Treasury are not included.

Exchange Rates

All transactions involving foreign currency in the Brazilian market, whether carried out by investors resident or domiciled in Brazil or investors resident or domiciled abroad, must now be conducted on the consolidated exchange market through institutions authorized by the Central Bank and subject to the rules of the Central Bank.

The Central Bank has allowed thereal to float freely against the U.S. dollar since January 15, 1999. Since the beginning of 2001, the Brazilian exchange market has been increasingly volatile, and, until early 2003, the value of thereal declined relative to the U.S. dollar, primarily due to financial and political instability in Brazil and Argentina. According to the Central Bank, in 2005, 2006 and 2007, however, the period-end value of thereal appreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar 13.4%, 9.5% and 20.7%, respectively. In 2008, the period-end value of thereal depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 24.2%. In 2009 and 2010, the period-end value of thereal appreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 34.2% and 4.3%. In 2011, thereal depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 11.2%. In 2013 and 2012, thereal depreciated by 13.2% and 8.9% against the U.S. dollar, respectively. On December 31, 2012, the period-endreal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.0435 per U.S. $1.00, and on December 31, 2013 it was R$2.3420 per U.S.$1.00. In 2014, the period-end value of thereal depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 13.4%. On December 31, 2014, the period-endreal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.6562 per U.S. $1.00. In 2015, the period-end value of thereal depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar by 47.0%. On December 31, 2015, the period-endreal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.9048 per U.S. $1.00. On December 31, 2016, the period-endreal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.2591 per U.S. $1.00. On December 31, 2017, the period-endreal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.308 per U.S. $1.00. On December 31, 2018, the period-endreal/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.875 per U.S. $1.00. Although the Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in the foreign exchange rates, the exchange market may continue to be volatile as a result of this instability or other factors, and, therefore, thereal may substantially decline or appreciate in value in relation to the U.S. dollar in the future.

The following table shows the selling rate, expressed inreais per U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods and dates indicated.

Source: Central Bank.

On April 24, 2017,November 8, 2019, the selling rate was R$3.1254.137 to US$1.00. Thereal/dollar exchange rate fluctuates and, therefore, the selling rate at April 24, 2017,November 8, 2019, may not be indicative of future exchange rates.

Brazilian law provides that, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or serious reasons to foresee such imbalance, temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. For approximately six months in 1989, and early 1990, for example, the Federal Government froze all dividend and capital repatriations that were owed to foreign equity investors. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Federal Government directives. There can be no assurance that similar measures will not be taken by the Federal Government in the future.

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

This section is intended to be a summary of the more detailed discussion included elsewhere in this annual report. Our business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects could be adversely affected if any of these risks occurs, and as a result, the trading price of our common shares and ADSs could decline. The risks described below are those known to us and those that we currently believe may materially affect us.

Risks Relating to Our Business and to the Brazilian Real Estate Industry

Our business, results of operations, financial condition and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs may be adversely affected by weaknesses in general economic, real estate and other conditions.

The residential homebuilding and land development industry is cyclical and is significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions, such as:

Furthermore, the market value of undeveloped land, buildable lots and housing inventories held by us can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing economic and real estate market conditions. If there are significant adverse changes in economic or real estate market conditions, we will have to sell homes at a loss or hold land in inventory longer than planned.

For example, in 2008, the global financial crisis adversely impacted Brazil’s gross domestic product, or “GDP,” resulting in a decrease in both the number of developments launched and the rate of sales of our units. Since 2014, weakening economic conditions and political instability in Brazil, leading to an increasefluctuations in interest rates higherand inflation and an increase in levels of unemployment, among other factors, had an adverse impact on the real estate market, including a decrease in the levelvolume of launches in the Gafisa segmentlaunches and a sharp decrease in the overall volume of real estate launches in Brazil. Worldwide financial market volatility may also adversely impact government plans for the Brazilian real estate industry, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our business.

The Brazilian real estate industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with several developers on the basis of land availability and location, price, funding, design, quality, and reputation as well as for partnerships with other developers. Because our industry does not have high barriers to entry, new competitors, including international companies working in partnership with Brazilian developers, may enter into the industry, further intensifying this competition. Some of our current potential competitors may have greater financial and other resources than we do. Furthermore, a significant portion of our real estate development and construction activity is conducted in the statesstate of São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro for Gafisa, and São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul and Bahia for Tenda, areasan area where the real estate market is highly competitive due to a scarcity of properties in

desirable locations and the relatively large number of local competitors. If we are not able to compete effectively, our business, our financial condition and the results of our operations could be adversely affected.

Problems with the construction and timely completion of our real estate projects, as well as third party projects for which we have been hired as a contractor, may damage our reputation, expose us to civil liability and decrease our profitability.

The quality of work in the construction of our real estate projects and the timely completion of these projects are major factors that affect our reputation, and therefore our sales and growth. We may experience delays in the construction of our projects or there may be defects in materials and/or workmanship. Any defects could delay the completion of our real estate projects, or, if such defects are discovered after completion, expose us to civil lawsuits by purchasers or tenants. These factors may also adversely affect our reputation as a contractor for third party projects, since we are responsible for our construction services and the building itself for five years. Construction projects often involve delays in obtaining, or the inability to obtain, permits or approvals from the relevant authorities. In addition, construction projects may also encounter delays due to adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, fires, delays in the provision of materials or labor, accidents, labor disputes, unforeseen engineering, environmental or geological problems, disputes with contractors and subcontractors, unforeseen conditions at construction sites, disputes with surrounding landowners, or other events. In addition, we may encounter previously unknown conditions at or near our construction sites that may delay or prevent construction of a particular project. If we encounter a previously unknown condition at or near a site, we may be required to correct the condition prior to continuing construction and there may be a delay in the construction of a particular project. The occurrence of any one or more of these problems in our real estate projects could adversely affect our reputation and our future sales.

We may incur construction and other development costs for a project that exceeds our original estimates due to increases over time in interest rates, real estate taxes or costs associated with materials and labor, among others. We may not be able to pass these increased costs on to purchasers. Construction delays, scarcity of skilled workers, default and or bankruptcy of third party contractors, cost overruns and adverse conditions may also increase project development costs. In addition, delays in the completion of a project may result in a delay in the commencement of cash flow, which would increase our capital needs.

Our inability to acquire adequate capital to finance our projects could delay the launch of new projects and adversely affect our business.

We expect that the continued expansion and development of our business will require significant capital, including working capital, which we may be unable to obtain on acceptable terms, or at all, to fund our capital expenditures and operating expenses, including working capital needs. We may fail to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to meet our cash requirements. Furthermore, our capital requirements may vary materially from those currently planned if, for example, our revenues do not reach expected levels or we have to incur unforeseen capital expenditures and make investments to maintain our competitive position. If this is the case, we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated, or we may have to delay some of our new development and expansion plans or otherwise forgo market opportunities. Future borrowing instruments such as credit facilities are likely to contain restrictive covenants, particularly in light of the recent economic downturn and unavailability of credit, and/or may require us to pledge assets as security for borrowings under those facilities. Our inability to obtain additional capital on satisfactory terms may delay or prevent the expansion of our business, which would have an adverse effect on our business. As of December 31, 2016,2018, our net debt plus payable to venture partners (indebtedness from debentures, loans and financing, and project financing and payables to venture partners balance, net of our cash and short term investments position) was R$1,385.6752.3 million, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were R$253.2137.2 million and our total debt was R$1,638.8 million including obligations to venture partners of R$1.2 889.4 million.

Changing market conditions may adversely affect our ability to sell our property inventories at expected prices, which could reduce our margins and adversely affect the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.

We must constantly locate and acquire new tracts of land for development and development home sites to support our homebuilding operations. There is a lag between the time we acquire land for development or development home sites and the time that we can bring the properties to market and sell homes. As a result, we face the risk that demand for housing may decline, costs of labor or materials may increase, interest rates may increase, currencies may fluctuate and political uncertainties may occur during this period and that we will not be able to dispose of developed properties at expected prices or profit margins or within anticipated time frames or at all. Significant expenditures associated with investments in real estate, such as maintenance costs, construction costs and debt payments, cannot generally be reduced if changes in the economy cause a decrease in revenues from our properties. The market value of property inventories, undeveloped tracts of land and desirable locations can fluctuate significantly because of changing market

conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs (including interest on

funds unused to acquire land or build homes) can be significant and can adversely affect our performance. Because of these factors, we may be forced to sell homes and other real properties at a loss or for prices that generate lower profit margins than we anticipate. We may also be required to make material write-downs of the book value of our real estate assets in accordance with Brazilian and U.S. GAAP if values decline. The occurrence of any of these factors may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are subject to risks normally associated with permitting our purchasers to make payments in installments; if there are higher than anticipated defaults or if our costs of providing such financing increase, then our profitability could be adversely affected.

As is common in our industry, we and the special purpose entities, or “SPEs,” in which we participate permit some purchasers of the units in our projects to make payments in installments. As a result, we are subject to the risks associated with this financing, including the risk of default in the payment of principal or interest on the loans we make as well as the risk of increased costs for the funds raised by us. In addition, our term sales agreements usually bear interest and provide for an inflation adjustment. If the rate of inflation increases, the loan payments under these term sales agreements may increase, which may lead to a higher rate of payment default. If the default rate among our purchasers increases, our cash generation and, therefore, our profitability could be adversely affected.

In the case of a payment default after the delivery of financed units, Brazilian law provides for the filing of a collection claim to recover the amount owed or to repossess the unit following specified procedures. The collection of overdue amounts or the repossession of the property is a lengthy process and involves additional costs. It is uncertain that we can recover the full amount owed to us or that if we repossess a unit, we can re-sell the unit at favorable terms or at all.

The affordable entry-level segment is strongly dependent on the availability of financing, including from theMinha Casa, Minha Vida program and fromCaixa Econômica Federal, or the “CEF.” The scarcity of financing, the increase in interest rates, the reduction in financing terms, share of financing per unit and subsidies or any other modification in other financing terms and conditions may adversely affect the performance of the affordable entry-level segment.

If we or the SPEs inSpecial Purpose Entities (Sociedade de Propósito Específico or “SPEs )in which we participate fail to comply with or become subject to more onerous government regulations, our business could be adversely affected.

We and the SPEs in which we participate are subject to various federal, state and municipal laws and regulations, including those relating to construction, zoning, soil use, urban regulations, environmental protection, historical sites, consumer protection and antitrust. We are required to obtain, maintain and renew on a regular basis permits, licenses and authorizations from various governmental authorities in order to carry out our projects. We strive to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, as well as with conditions of permits, licenses and authorizations. If we are unable to achieve or maintain compliance with these laws, regulations and conditions, we could be subject to fines, project shutdowns, cancellation of licenses and revocation of authorizations or other restrictions on our ability to develop our projects, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our contractors and subcontractors are required to comply with various labor and environmental regulations and tax and other regulatory obligations. Because we are secondary obligors to these contractors and subcontractors, if they fail to comply with these regulations or obligations, we may be subject to penalties by the relevant regulatory bodies, and to indemnification claims from affected third parties.

Regulations governing the Brazilian real estate industry as well as environmental laws have tended to become more restrictive over time. We cannot assure that new and stricter standards will not be passed or become applicable to us, or that stricter interpretations of existing laws and regulations will not be adopted. Furthermore, we cannot assure that any such more onerous regulations would not cause delays in our projects or that we would be able to secure the relevant permits and licenses. Any such event may require us to spend additional funds to achieve compliance with such new rules and therefore make the development of our projects more costly, which could adversely affect our business and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.

Scarcity of financing and/or increased interest rates could cause a decrease in the demand for real estate properties, which could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.

The scarcity of financing and/or an increase in interest rates or in other indirect financing costs may adversely affect the ability or willingness of prospective buyers to purchase our products and services, especially prospective low income buyers. A majority of the bank financing obtained by prospective buyers comes from the Housing

Financial System (Sistema Financeiro de Habitação), or the “SFH,” which is financed by funds raised from savings account deposits. The Brazilian Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional), or the “CMN,” often changes the amount of such funds that banks are required to make available for real estate financing. If the CMN restricts the amount of available funds that can be used to finance the purchase of real estate properties, or if there is an increase

in interest rates, there may be a decrease in the demand for our residential and commercial properties and for the development of lots of land, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We and other companies in the real estate industry frequently extend credit to our clients. As a result, we are subject to risks associated with providing financing, including the risk of default on amounts owed to us, as well as the risk of increased costs of funding our operations. An increase in inflation would raise the nominal amounts due from our clients, pursuant to their sales agreements, which may increase their rates of default. If this were to occur, our cash generation and, therefore, our operating results may be adversely affected. In addition, we obtain financings from financial institutions at different rates and subject to different indexes and may be unable to match our debt service requirements with the terms of the financings we grant to our clients. The mismatch of rates and terms between the funds we obtain and the financings we grant may adversely affect us.

Some of our subsidiaries use significant funding from the “Minha Casa, Minha Vida” financing programs of the CEF and Banco do Brasil, or “BB”, and, as a result, are subject to institutional and operating changes in the CEF and BB and enhanced customer risk profiles associated with clients eligible for these programs.

The CEF and BB have financing programs in connection with the Brazilian government’s public housing program called “Minha Casa, Minha Vida.” for the low-income segment, which are used by Tenda to fund its activities. The CEF and BB are state-owned and mixed capital financial institutions and are subject to political influence, which may change the availability or the terms of the home financing programs. The cancelation, suspension, interruption or a significant change in such programs may affect our growth estimates and our business. Furthermore, the suspension, interruption or slowdown in the activities of the CEF or BB to approve projects, grant financing to our clients and evaluate construction process, among other activities, may adversely impact our business, financial position, results of operations and the market price of our common shares and ADSs.

The “Minha Casa, Minha Vida” program was created in March 2009 by the Brazilian government. The second phase of the program, which was implemented from 2011 to 2014, financed and built approximately 2.3 million houses, with approximately 1.4 million additional houses under construction. In 2015, the Brazilian government announced the third phase of the program. The program aims to reduce the housing deficit in Brazil, which as of 2014 was estimated to be 5.2 million houses. The program’s “MCMV I” and “MCMV II” phases call for total government investment of up to R$230 billion, to be made available through financing from the CEF and BB, and aim to build approximately 4.1 million houses for families with monthly incomes of up to ten times the minimum wage. This program offers, among other things, long-term financing, lower interest rates, greater share of the property financed to the client, subsidies based on income level, lower insurance costs and the creation of a guarantor fund to refinance debt in case of unemployment. Financing to the affordable entry-level segment is primarily made available through the CEF and BB. On March 30, 2016, the Brazilian government launched “MCMVIII”, the third phase of the program, which aims to build approximately 2 million houses in the next three years, with a total investment of approximately R$210.6 billion. In the first quarter of 2017, the Brazilian government launched “MCMVIV”, the fourth phase of the program, which aims to build approximately 610 thousand houses in 2017, with a total investment of approximately R$8.5 billion.

Any changes in such financing would force us to seek new sources of financing and the availability of funds under similar conditions is limited, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may sell portions of our landbank located in nonstrategic regions, which is in line with our future strategies. As a result, we will prepare an annual analysis for impairment of our landbank.

As part of our strategy to focus our future operations on regions where our developments have historically been successful, and where we believe there is homebuilding potential based on market opportunities, we may sell portions of our landbank located outside of these regions. As a result, we will prepare an annual impairment analysis of our landbank based on the acquisition cost of the land in our portfolio. In 2011, we made a decision to sell a portion of our landbank given our narrowed geographic focus and our evaluation of impairment resulted in recording a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale in the amount of R$92.1 million. In December 2012, we had R$53.8 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2013, we had R$68.5 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2014, we had R$63.5 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2015, we had R$50.3 million recorded as a provision for

impairment on landbank and properties for sale. Since 2016, our impairment analysis has been negatively impacted by the challenging macroeconomics conditions in the real estate sector and in Brazil as a whole, which has led to a decrease in sales prices for our commercial and residential units. As of December 31, 2016, we had R$174.4 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2016,2017, we had R$174.4310.6 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale. As of December 31, 2018, we had R$63.1 million recorded as a provision for impairment on landbank and properties for sale.

The real estate industry is dependent on the availability of credit, especially in the affordable entry-level segment.

One of our main strategies is to expand our operations to the affordable entry-level segment in which clients are strongly dependent on bank financing to purchase homes. This financing may not be available on favorable terms to our clients, or at all. Changes in the Real Estate Financing System (Sistema de Financiamento Imobiliário), or the “SFI,” and in the SFH rules, the scarcity of available resources or an increase in interest rates may affect the ability or desire of such clients to purchase homes, consequently affecting the demand for homes. These factors would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we recognize sales revenue from our real estate properties under the percentage of completion method of accounting under Brazilian GAAP as generally adopted by construction companies and under U.S. GAAP, when we meet the conditions specified by the respective accounting standards,transferring control, an adjustment in the cost of a development project may reduce or eliminate previously reported revenue and income.

We recognize revenue from the sale of units in our properties based on the percentage of completion method of accounting, which requires us to recognize revenue as we incur the cost of construction. Total cost estimates are revised on a regular basis as the work progresses, and adjustments based upon such revisions are reflected in our results of operations in accordance with the method of accounting used. To the extent that these adjustments result in an increase, a reduction or an elimination of previously reported income, we will recognize a credit to or a charge against income, which could have an adverse effect on our previously reported revenue and income.

Our participation in SPEs creates additional risks, including potential problems in our financial and business relationships with our partners.

We invest in special purpose entities (Sociedade de Propósito EspecíficoSPEs with or “SPEs”) withwithout other real estate developers and construction companies in Brazil. The risks involved with SPEs include the potential bankruptcy of our SPE partners and the possibility of diverging or inconsistent economic or business interests between us and our partners. If an SPE partner fails to perform or is financially unable to bear its portion of the required capital contributions, we could be required to make additional investments and provide additional services in order to make up for our partner’s shortfall. In addition, under Brazilian

law, the partners of an SPE may be liable for certain obligations of an SPE, including with respect to tax, labor, environmental and consumer protection laws and regulations. These risks could adversely affect us.

We may experience difficulties in finding desirable land tracts, and increases in the price of land may increase our cost of sales and decrease our earnings.

Our continued growth depends in large part on our ability to continue to acquire land and to do so at a reasonable cost. As more developers enter or expand their operations in the Brazilian home building industry, land prices could rise significantly and suitable land could become scarce due to increased demand, decreased supply or both. A resulting rise in land prices may increase our cost of sales and decrease our earnings.earnings on future developments. We may not be able to continue to acquire suitable land at reasonable prices in the future, which could adversely affect our business.

The market value of our inventory of undeveloped land may decrease, thus adversely affecting our results of operations.

We own tracts of undeveloped land that are part of our inventory for future developments. We also intend to increase our inventory and acquire larger tracts of land. The market value of these properties may significantly decrease from the acquisition date to the development of the project as a result of economic downturns or market conditions, which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Increases in the price of raw materials and fixtures may increase our cost of sales and reduce our earnings.

The basic raw materials and fixtures used in the construction of our homes include concrete, concrete block, steel, aluminum, bricks, windows, doors, roof tiles and plumbing fixtures. Increases in the price of these and other raw materials, including increases that may occur as a result of shortages, duties, restrictions, or fluctuations in exchange rates, could increase our cost of sales. Any such cost increases could reduce our earnings and adversely affect our business.

If we are not able to implement our growth strategy as planned, or at all, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We plan to grow our business by selectively expanding to meet the growth potential of the Brazilian residential market. We believe that there is increasing competition for suitable real estate development sites. We may not find suitable additional sites for development of new projects or other suitable expansion opportunities.

We anticipate that we will need additional financing to implement our expansion strategy and we may not have access to the funding required for the expansion of our business or such funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms. We may finance the expansion of our business with additional indebtedness or by issuing additional debt or equity securities. For example, on October 7, 2013, we entered into a Real Estate Finance System (SFI) loan in the amount of R$300 million. The loan is scheduled to mature in July 2017. The loan is secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. The purpose of the loan is to provide funding for housing projects only. The loan agreement contains restrictive covenants which trigger early redemption upon the occurrence of certain events of default.

In July 2014, we issued R$130 million in non-convertible debentures on a private placement basis. The debentures are secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. The proceeds of the debentures will be used to fund the development of such real estate ventures only. The debentures holders assigned their fiduciary rights in the real estate receivables in favor of a real estate securitization SPE, which issued Certificates of Real Estate Receivables (Certificados de Recebíveis Imobiliários) or “CRIs”, backed by such real estate receivables.

In September 2014, the Company entered into a Real Estate Finance System (SFI) loan in the amount of R$194 million. The loan is scheduled to mature in October 2018. The loan is secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. The purpose of the loan is to provide funding for housing projects only.

In January 2015, we issued R$55 million in non-convertible debentures on a private placement basis. The debentures are secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. The debentures are scheduled to mature on January 20, 2020. The proceeds of the debentures will be used to fund the development of such real estate ventures only.

In December 2015, we entered into a real estate sales receivables (Cédula de Crédito Imobiliário, or “CCI”) transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$32.2 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$24.5 million.

In March 2016, we entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$36.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$27.3 million.

In May 2016, , we entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$23.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$17.5 million.

In August 2016, we entered into a CCI transaction related to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$21.4 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$14.9million.14.9 million.

In September 2016, we issued a certificate of bank credit (Cédula de Crédito Bancário, or “CCB”) in the amount of R$65 million to finance our operation and to provide working capital for the Company. The CCB is guaranteed by a specific portion of our landbank and real estate receivables.

In December 2016, we entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$27.0 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$19.5 million.

In March 2017, we entered into a CCI transaction relating to a portfolio comprising selected residential real estate receivables from Gafisa and its subsidiaries. The assigned portfolio of receivables amounts to R$30.2 million in exchange for cash at the transfer date, discounted to present value, for R$23.0 million.

In March 2017, we issued a CCB in the amount of R$47 million to finance our operation and to provide working capital for the Company. The CCB is guaranteed by real estate receivables.

In April 2017, we issued a CCB in the amount of R$12 million to finance our operation and to provide working capital for the Company. The CCB is guaranteed by a specific portion of our landbank.

In November 2017, we issued a CCB in the amount of R$40 million to finance our operation and to provide working capital for the Company. The CCB is guaranteed by real estate receivables.

In November 2017, we issued two series of non-convertible debentures totaling R$120 million on a private placement basis. The first series of debentures totaling R$90 million is secured by (i) first-priority mortgages over select real estate ventures of the Company and (ii) fiduciary assignments of real estate receivables generated by such select real estate ventures. In November 2017, the debenture holders assigned their fiduciary rights in the real estate receivables to a real estate securitization special purpose entity, which issued Certificates of Real Estate Receivables (Certificados de Recebíveis Imobiliários) or “CRIs”, backed by such real estate receivables. The second series of debentures totaling R$30 million, and guaranteed by a fiduciary guarantee, has not been placed with investors as of the date of this annual report. The proceeds of the debentures will be used to fund the development of the aforementioned real estate ventures only.

In May 2018, we issued R$76 million in non-convertible debentures on a private placement basis. The debentures are secured by (i) a fiduciary assignment of current and future receivables derived from the sale of a specific residential project’s individual units; (ii) fiduciary assignment of receivables over future sales of the project’s residential units, which are currently not set aside for sale, and over units which have been set aside for sale but which are subject to cancellation by the buyer; and (iii) a performance bond issued to ensure the completion of the residential project’s construction. The debentures are scheduled to mature on July 20, 2020. The proceeds of the debentures will be used to build the “Moov Espaço Cerâmica” residential project, which is being developed on property registered under No. 49.375 at the 2^nd Property Registrar of São Caetano do Sul – SP. The face value of the private placement will accrue interest corresponding to the cumulative variation of Interbank Deposit (DI) plus 3.75% per annum.

In July 2018, we issued R$90 million in non-convertible debentures on a private placement basis, with a final maturity of June 2022. The proceeds from the placement will be used in the development of select real estate ventures and their guarantees are over conditional sales of real estate receivables. The face value of the private placement will accrue interest corresponding to the cumulative variation of Interbank Deposit (DI) plus 3% per annum.

In September 2018, we issued a CCB in the amount of R$40 million to finance our operations and to provide working capital for the Company. The CCB is guaranteed by real estate receivables.

We could face financial risks, covenant restrictions and restrictions on our ability to employ assets associated with incurring additional indebtedness, such as reducing our liquidity and access to financial markets and increasing the amount of cash flow required to service such indebtedness, or associated with issuing additional stock, such as dilution of ownership and earnings.

There are risks for which we do not have insurance coverage or the insurance coverage we have in place may not be sufficient to cover damages that we may suffer.

We maintain insurance policies with coverage for certain risks, including damages arising from engineering defects, fire, landslides, storms, gas explosions and civil liabilities stemming from construction errors. We believe that the level of insurance we have contracted for accidents is consistent with market practice. However, there can be no assurance that such policies will always be available or provide sufficient coverage for certain damages. In addition, there are certain risks that may not be covered by such policies, such as damages resulting from war, force majeure or the interruption of certain activities and, therefore any requirement to pay amounts not covered by our insurance may have a negative impact on our business and our results of operations. Furthermore, we are required to pay penalties and other fines whenever there is delay in the delivery of our units, and such penalties and fines are not covered by our insurance policies.

Moreover, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to renew our current insurance policies under favorable terms, or at all. As a result, insufficient insurance coverage or our inability to renew existing insurance policies could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our level of indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our financial health, diminish our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the real estate industry.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, our total debt (loans, financing and debentures) and payables to venture partners was R$1,638.8889.4 million and our short-term debt and payables to venture partners was R$985.9348.4 million. In addition, as of December 31, 20162018 our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments available was R$253.2137.2 million and our net debt represented 71.8%152.5% of our shareholders’ equity including the non-controlling interest. Our indebtedness has variable interest rates. Our level of indebtedness could have important negative consequences for us. For example, it could:

Certain of our debt agreements contain financial and other covenants and any default under such debt agreements may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and cash flows.

Certain of our existing debt agreements contain restrictions and covenants and require the maintenance or satisfaction of specified financial ratios, ratings and tests.tests, cash generation, capitalization, debt coverage, maintenance of shareholding position, and others. Our ability to meet these financial ratios, ratings and tests can be affected by events beyond our control and we cannot assure that we will meet those tests, especially given the lower yield environment in which the industry currently operates. Failure to meet or satisfy any of these covenants, financial ratios or financial tests could result in an event of default under these and other agreements, as a result of cross-default provisions. If we are unable to comply with our debt covenants, we could be forced to seek waivers.

If we are unable to obtain waivers, a large portion of our debt could be subject to acceleration. We do not believe such occurrence to be likely; however, if it were to happen, we could be required to renegotiate, restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek additional equity capital or sell assets, which could materially and adversely affect us.

We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in obtaining any waivers. As of December 31, 2016,2018, the Company and its subsidiaries were in compliance with the contractual covenants provided for in our debentures and our credit instruments, except for a breach ofnon-compliance with a certain restrictive covenant in one of the Company’s CCB’s.CCB’s and three SFH loans, for which we need to re-establish their guarantees. This breach wasoccurred mainly due to an impairment of R$610.1 million we recorded in line with CPC 31 – Non-Current Asset Held for Sale and Income from Discontinued Operations as a result of an impairment adjustment of R$112.8 million related to AUSA’s goodwill. In addition, we recorded an impairment adjustment of R$63.1 million in our landbank and inventory units, which were being sold below their accounting value due to the discontinuationeffects of Tenda’s operations under Brazilian GAAPthe challenging macroeconomic conditions in the real estate sector and in Brazil as a whole. These debt agreements were classified as short term debt in the Company’s 2016, 2015 and 2014 consolidated statementsfinancial statements. As of operations (as described above), for which the Company obtained a waiver from the relevant creditor for the year ended December 31, 2016 and period ended March 31, 2017. See Notes 12, 13 and 31(iii) to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere indate of this annual report.

report, we have settled the CCB transaction and we are in the process of negotiating the re-establishment of the related SFH loans guarantees and we have not received an acceleration notice in connection with such non-compliance. The Company analyzed all of its other debt agreements and did not identify any impact on its restrictive covenants in such other debt agreements resulting from this non-compliance. Failures or delays by our third party contractors may adversely affect our reputation and business and expose us to civil liability.

Failures or delays by our third party contractors may adversely affect our reputation and business and exposes us to civil liability.

We engage third party contractors to provide services for our projects. Therefore, the quality of work in the construction of our real estate projects and the timely completion of these projects may depend on factors that are

beyond our control, including the quality and timely delivery of building materials and the technical skills of the outsourced professionals. Such outsourcing may delay the identification of construction problems and, as a result, the correction of such problems. Any failures, delays or defects in the services provided by our third party contractors may adversely affect our reputation and relationship with our clients, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may be unable to successfully implement our strategy of reorganizing our operational organization and performance.

We are currently implementing our strategy to reorganize our operational infrastructure to promote and enhance our performance. This strategy includes the implementation of a new management structure that, among other things, assigns each brand manager direct responsibility for the operating performance of each brand, and implementing a corporate culture shift within our Tenda brand focused on aligning incentives to improve project execution. As a result, we established an operating structure organized by brand (Gafisa and Tenda) and appointed divisional executive officers responsible for the profit and loss of each business unit. This strategy is intended to pursue the goal of helping to produce more stable cash flow and contributing toward a return to sustainable growth.

On February 7, 2014, we and Tenda issued a notice of material fact to the market reporting that our management was authorized by its board of directors to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of our business unit and Tenda’s business unit into two publicly held and independent companies, in view of the fact that we and Tenda have distinct profiles in respect of strategy, operations and capital structure, and that the synergies between our operations and Tenda’s operations are limited.

After analyzing certain alternatives, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction in our total capital stock. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement, or the “SPA”, with Jaguar Real Estate Partners, LP, or “Jaguar”, pursuant to which we will sell Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock of Tenda.

The consummation of the transactions described above is subject to certain conditions, among others, established in the SPA, as well as to the entering into between us and Tenda of certain separation agreements, the obtaining of approvals from the competent corporate bodies and obtaining the consent of certain creditors and third parties. For more information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company.”

There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully implement our strategy or satisfy the conditions necessary to enable the transactions described above, and therefore we may also be unsuccessful in achieving such goals behind such strategy, which could result in a material adverse effect with respect to our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Unfavorable judicial, administrative or arbitration decisions may adversely affect us.

We currently are, and may be in the future, defendants in several judicial, administrative proceedings related to civil, labor and tax matters. We cannot assure you that we will obtain favorable decisions in such proceedings, that such proceedings will be dismissed, or that our provisions for such proceedings are sufficient in the event of an unfavorable decision. Unfavorable decisions that impede our operations, as initially planned, or that result in a claim

amount that is not adequately covered by provisions in our balance sheet, may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We may be held responsible for labor liabilities of our third party contractors.

We may be held responsible for the labor liabilities of our third party contractors and obligated to pay for fines imposed by the relevant authorities in the event that our third party contractors do not comply with applicable legislation. As of December 31, 2016,2018, R$35.336.6 million of our R$61.757.7 million of total labor liabilities and provisions were for such liabilities. Approximately 57.8%79% of the labor claims were commenced by employees of our third party contractors. An adverse result in such claims would cause an adverse effect on our business.

Failure to keep members of our senior management and/or our ability to recruit and retain qualified professionals may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our future success depends on the continued service and performance of our senior management and our ability to recruit and retain qualified professionals. None of the members of our senior management are bound to long-term labor contracts or non-compete agreements and there can be no assurance that we will successfully recruit and retain qualified professionals to our management as our business grows. The loss of any key professionals or our inability to recruit or retain qualified professionals may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Changes in Brazilian GAAP issued by CPC may differ from IFRS and may adversely affect our results.

Brazilian corporate law was amended by Law No. 11,638 dated December 28, 2007 in order to facilitate the convergence of Brazilian GAAP with IFRS, and thereafter, the CPC issued new accounting standards that generally converged Brazilian GAAP to IFRS.

On May 28, 2014, the IASB published IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“IFRS 15”) (CPC 47), which establishes principles that will apply to the recognition of revenue under IFRS. IFRS 15 will require entities to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. When adopted, IFRS 15 will supersede most of the detailed guidance on the recognition of revenue that currently applies under IFRS. In connection with the real estate development sector, the maintenance of the Percentage of Completion revenue recognition method or the adoption of the method of revenue recognition at the time the each relevant unit is delivered will be the result of the contractual analysis performed by our management. IFRS 15 will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.

We are in the process of evaluating the impact of CPC 47 on our financial statements. As of the date of this annual report, we have not completed our analysis of CPC 47 and we have not determined the extent to which it will impact our financial statements once they are adopted.

Risks Relating to Brazil

Brazilian economic, political and other conditions, and Brazilian government policies or actions in response to these conditions, may negatively affect our business and results of operations and the market price of our common shares or the ADSs.

The Brazilian economy has been characterized by unstable economic cycles and frequent and occasionally extensive intervention by the Brazilian government. The Brazilian government has often changed monetary, fiscal, credit, tariff and other policies to influence the course of the Brazilian economy. For example, the government’s actions to control inflation have at times involved setting wage and price controls, blocking access to bank accounts, imposing exchange controls and limiting imports into Brazil. We have no control over, and cannot predict, what policies or actions the Brazilian government may take in the future.

Our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects, as well as the market prices of our common shares or the ADSs, may be adversely affected by, among others, the following factors:

Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian government may implement changes in policy or regulations may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets as well as securities issued abroad by Brazilian issuers. As a result, these uncertainties and other future developments in the Brazilian economy may adversely affect us and our business and results of operations and the market price of our common shares and the ADSs.

In addition, the Brazilian Congress commenced impeachment proceedings against then President Dilma Rousseff on December 2, 2015, for violating budgetary laws to prop up the Brazilian economy during her reelection campaign in 2014. On April 17, 2016, more than two-thirds of Brazil’s Congress voted to proceed with the impeachment proceedings. The proceedings then moved to the Senate, which on May 12, 2016 voted to commence a trial of President Rousseff, resulting in her suspension from the post for up to 180 days, during which time Vicethe then-Vice President Michel Temer assumed the Presidency. On August 31, 2016, President Rousseff was convictedimpeached by the Senate and definitively removed from office. On the same date, Michel Temer assumed the Presidency of Brazil until the next general elections, scheduledwhich occurred in October 2018 and which resulted in Jair Bolsonaro winning the election for Octoberthe Presidency. The election of 2018. Ms. Rousseff appealedMr. Bolsonaro as president could significantly change the Senate’s final decision tocourse of the Supreme Court, whose decision is pending.ongoing fiscal reforms and the economic policies being undertaken. In this context, it is currently uncertain whether Mr. TemerBolsonaro will enjoy the support of the Brazilian Congress, or what policies he will be able to implement. In addition, Mr. Temer and his government have been the target of protests throughout Brazil since he assumed power on a provisional and now definitive basis. We have no control over the political situation in Brazil and cannot foresee what policies or actions the Brazilian government may pursue. Uncertainty about the new president’s ability to adopt and implement new policies may reduce investor and market confidence, and as a result we are unable to predict the country’s political and economic direction in coming years.

Any of these factors may adversely affect the Brazilian economy, our business, financial condition, results of operations and the trading price of our common shares. The Brazilian government may be subject to internal pressure to change its current macroeconomic policies in order the achieve higher rates of economic growth, and has historically maintained a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thus restricting the availability of credit and reducing economic growth. We cannot foresee what policies the government will adopt. In addition, in the past, the Brazilian economy has been affected by political events in the country, which have also affected the confidence of investors and the general public, which harms the performance of the Brazilian economy. Furthermore, any indecision by the Brazilian government in implementing changes in certain policies or regulations may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil, and increase stock market volatility.

Inflation, and government measures to curb inflation, may adversely affect the Brazilian economy, the Brazilian securities market, our business and operations and the market prices of our common shares or the ADSs.

At times in the past, Brazil has experienced high rates of inflation. According to the General Market Price Index (Índice Geral de Preços—Mercado), or “IGP-M”, inflation rates in Brazil were 3.8% in 2006, 7.8% in 2007, 9.8% in 2008, (1.7)% in 2009, 11.3% in 2010, 5.1% in 2011, 7.8% in 2012, 5.5% in 2013, 3.7% in 2014, 10.5% in 2015, and 7.2% in 2016.2016, (0.5)% in 2017 and 7.5% in 2018. In addition, according to the Expanded Consumer Price Index (Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Ampliado), or “IPCA,” Brazilian consumer price inflation rates were 3.1% in 2006, 4.5% in 2007, 5.9% in 2008, 4.3% in 2009, 5.9% in 2010, 6.5% in 2011, 5.8% in 2012, 5.9% in 2013, 6.4% in 2014, 10.7% in 2015, and 6.3% in 2016.2016, 2.9% in 2017 and 3.7% in 2018. Our term sales agreements usually provide for an inflation adjustment linked to the National Construction Cost Index (Índice Nacional de Custo de Construção), or “INCC”. The INCC increased by 6.2% in 2007, 11.9% in 2008, 3.25% in 2009, 7.77% in 2010, 7.49% in 2011, 7.12% in 2012, 8.1% in 2013, 6.9% in 2014, 7.5% in 2015, and 6.1% in 2016.2016, 4.3% in 2017 and 3.8% in 2018. The Brazilian government’s measures to control inflation have often included maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting availability of credit and reducing economic growth. Inflation, actions to combat inflation and public speculation about possible additional actions have also contributed materially to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets.

Brazil may experience high levels of inflation in future periods. Periods of higher inflation may slow the rate of growth of the Brazilian economy, which could lead to reduced demand for our products in Brazil and decreased net sales. Inflation is also likely to increase some of our costs and expenses, which we may not be able to pass on to our customers and, as a result, may reduce our profit margins and net income. In addition, high inflation generally leads to higher domestic interest rates, and, as a result, the costs of servicing ourreais-denominated debt may increase,

resulting in lower net income. Inflation and its effect on domestic interest rates can, in addition, lead to reduced liquidity in the domestic capital and lending markets, which could affect our ability to refinance our indebtedness in those markets. In addition, increases in inflation rates would increase the outstanding debt of our customers, which could increase default levels and affect our cash flows. Any decline in our net operating revenue or net income and any deterioration in our financial condition would also likely lead to a decline in the market price of our common shares and the ADSs.

Social, political and economic events and the perception of risks, especially in other emerging economies, may adversely affect the Brazilian economy, and consequently, our business, financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our securities.

The Brazilian capital markets are influenced by the Brazilian market and economic conditions and, to a certain extent, by the conditions in other Latin American countries and other emerging market countries. Investors’ reactions to developments in certain countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of the securities of Brazilian issuers. Crises in other Latin American and emerging market countries normally trigger a significant outflow of funds and the reduction of foreign investment in Brazil. For example, in 2001 Argentina announced a moratorium on its public debt after a recession and a period of political instability, which affected investor perceptions towards the Brazilian capital markets for many years. Crises in other Latin American and emerging market countries may diminish investor interest in the securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours, which could negatively affect the market price of our common shares.

The market for securities issued by Brazilian companies is influenced, to a varying degree, by international economic and market conditions generally, especially in the United States. The prices of shares traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&FBovespaB3 S.A. — –Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (formerly BM&FBOVESPA –Bolsa de Valores, Mercadorias e Futuros)), or the “BM&FBOVESPA,“B3,” have been historically affected by the fluctuation of interest rates and stock exchange indexes in the United States. Events in other countries or capital markets could have an adverse effect on the price of our shares, which could make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and obtain financing on acceptable terms in the future, or at all.

Political instability and economic uncertainty in Brazil, including in relation to country-wide corruption probes, may adversely affect the price of our ADSs and our business, operations and financial condition

Brazil’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect the confidence of investors and the general public, which have historically resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued by companies with operations mainly in Brazil.

The recent political instability in Brazil has contributed to a decline in market confidence in the Brazilian economy. Various ongoing investigations into allegations of money laundering and corruption being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, including “Lava Jato” investigation regarding corruption at and with Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., or Petrobras, may hinder the growth ofhave negatively impacted the Brazilian economy and could have an adverse effect on our business.political environment.

A number of senior politicians, including current and former members of Congress and the Executive Branch, and high-ranking executive officers of major corporations and state-owned companies in Brazil were arrested, convicted of various charges relating to corruption, entered into plea agreements with federal prosecutors and/or have resigned or been removed from their positions as a result of these Lava Jato investigations. These individuals are alleged to have accepted bribes by means of kickbacks on contracts granted by the government to several infrastructure, oil and gas and construction companies. The profits of these kickbacks allegedly financed the political campaigns of political parties forming the previous government’s coalition that was led by former President Dilma Rousseff, which funds were unaccounted for or not publicly disclosed. These funds were also allegedly destined toward the personal enrichment of certain individuals. In addition,Petrobras S.A. and certain other Brazilian companies active in the energy and infrastructure sectors are facing investigations by the CVM, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Brazilian Federal Police and the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor’s Office, in connection with corruption allegations, or the “Lava Jato”Lava Jato investigations. Depending on the duration and outcome of such investigations, the companies involved may face downgrades from rating agencies, funding restrictions and a reduction in their revenues. Currently, elected officials and other public officials in Brazil are also being investigated for allegations of unethical and illegal conduct identified during the new major phase of the Lava Jato investigations, which began in July 2015. The potential outcome of these investigations is unknown, but theythe effects of Lava Jato as well as other ongoing corruption-related investigations have already hadresulted in an adverse impact on the image and reputation of thethose companies involved, and on Brazil’s economy and growth prospects in the near to medium term.

The allegations under the “Lava Jato” investigations along with the economic downturn resulted in Brazil being downgraded to non-investment grade status by S&P in September 2015, by Fitch Ratings in December 2015, and by Moody’s in February 2016,that have been implicated as well as inon the downgrade of various major Brazilian companies. Such downgrades have further worsened the conditionsgeneral market perception of the Brazilian economy, political environment and the conditionBrazilian capital markets. We have no control over, and cannot predict, whether such investigations or allegations will lead to further political and economic instability or whether new allegations against government officials will arise in the future.

Amidst this background of recent political uncertainty, in August 2016, the Brazilian companies, especially those relyingSenate approved the removal from office of Brazil’s then-President, Dilma Rousseff, following a legal and administrative impeachment process for infringement of budgetary laws. Michel Temer, the former Vice-President, who assumed the presidency of Brazil following Rousseff’s ouster, is also under investigation on foreign investments.corruption allegations and was arrested on March 21, 2019. In addition, the former President, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, began serving a 12-year prison sentence on corruption and money laundering charges in April 2018. On October 28, 2018, Jair Bolsonaro, a former member of the military and three-decade congressman, was elected the president of Brazil and took office on January 1, 2019.

Such investigationsDuring his presidential campaign, Mr. Bolsonaro was reported to favor the privatization of state-owned companies, economic liberalization, and social security and tax reforms. However, there is no guarantee that Mr. Bolsonaro will be successful in executing his campaign promises or passing certain favored reforms fully or at all, particularly when confronting a fractured Congress. In addition, his current minister of the economy, Paulo Guedes, proposed during the presidential campaign the revocation of income tax exemption on the payment of dividends, which, if enacted, would increase the tax expenses associated with any dividend or distribution by Brazilian companies, which could impact our capacity to receive, from our subsidiaries, future cash dividends or distributions net of taxes. Moreover, Mr. Bolsonaro was generally a polarizing figure during his campaign for presidency, and we cannot predict the ways in which a divided electorate may continue to impact his presidency nor the government’s ability to implement policies and reforms, all of which could have recently extendeda negative impact on our business and the price of our ADSs.

It is expected from current Brazilian federal government to persons in high positions inpropose the executivegeneral terms of fiscal reform to stimulate the economy and legislative branches ofreduce the forecasted budget deficit for 2019 and following years, but it is uncertain whether the Brazilian government which has caused considerable political instability. It is difficultwill be able to gather the required support in the Brazilian Congress to pass additional specific reforms. In February 2019, the Brazilian federal government presented to the Congress a bill proposing a large and comprehensive change of Brazil’s public social security system. If some or all of these public expenses are maintained and the required reforms are not passed, Brazil will continue to run a budget deficit for 2019 and the years going forward. We cannot predict the effects of this budget deficit on the Brazilian economy. We cannot predict which policies the Brazilian federal government may adopt or change or the effect that any such political instability. Persistent economic hardship in Brazil resulting from, among other factors,policies might have on our business and on the Brazilian economy. Any such investigations, the developments arising therefrom and a scenario of high political instabilitynew policies or changes to current policies may have a material adverse effectimpact on us.our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Persistently poor macroeconomicMoreover the market value of securities issued by Brazilian companies is also affected at different levels by economic and market conditions resultingin other countries, including other Latin American countries and emerging countries. Although economic conditions in these countries may differ significantly from amongeconomic conditions in Brazil, the reaction of investors to events in these other things, the Lava Jato investigations and their consequences, couldcountries may have an adverse effect on our business.the market value of securities of issuers based in Brazil. Crises in other emerging markets may reduce investor interest in securities of issuers based in Brazil.

Fluctuations in interest rates may have an adverse effect on our business and the market prices of our common shares and the ADSs.

The Central Bank, through the Monetary Policy Committee (Comitê de Política Monetária), or the “COPOM,” establishes the Special Clearance and Escrow System rate (Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custodia), or the “SELIC rate,” which is the basic interest rate for the Brazilian financial system by reference to the level of economic growth of the Brazilian economy, the level of inflation and other economic indicators. The SELIC rate is also an important policy instrument used by the Brazilian government to achieve inflation targets it established on June 21, 1999 (Decree No. 3,088).

As of December 31, 2011, the SELIC rate was 11%. As of December 31, 2012, the Central Bank had significantly reduced the SELIC rate to 7.25%. As of December 31, 2013, the Central Bank had increased the SELIC rate to 10%. As of December 31, 2014, the Central Bank had further increased the SELIC rate to 11.75%. As of December 31, 2015, the SELIC rate was 14.25%, and as. As of December 31, 2016, the SELIC rate was 13.75%, as of December 31, 2017, the SELIC rate was 7.0% and as of December 31, 2018, the SELIC rate was 6.5%. As of the date of this annual report, the SELIC rate is 11.25%6.5%. Debts of companies in the real estate industry, including ours, are subject to the fluctuation of the SELIC rate. Should the SELIC rate continue to increase, the costs relating to the service of our debt obligations may also increase.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, our indebtedness was denominated inreais and subject to Brazilian floating interest rates, such as the Reference Interest Rate (Taxa Referencial), or “TR,” and the Interbank Deposit Certificate Rate

(Certificado de Depósito Interbancário), or “CDI rate.” Any increase in the TR rate or the CDI rate may have an adverse impact on our financial expenses, our results of operations and on the market price of our common shares or the ADSs. We are not a party to any hedging instruments with respect to our indebtedness.

Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may adversely affect your ability to receive dividends and distributions on the ADSs and on our common shares, or the proceeds of any sale of our common shares.

Brazilian law permits the Brazilian government to impose temporary restrictions on conversions of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies and on remittances to foreign investors of proceeds from their investments in Brazil whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are reasons to expect a pending serious imbalance. The Brazilian government last imposed remittance restrictions for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990. The Brazilian government may take similar measures in the future. Any imposition of restrictions on conversions and remittances could hinder or prevent holders of our common shares or the ADSs from converting into U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies and remitting abroad dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale in Brazil of our common shares. Exchange controls could also prevent us from making payments on our U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations and hinder our ability to access the international capital markets. As a result, exchange controls restrictions could reduce the market prices of our common shares and the ADSs.

Changes in tax laws may increase our tax burden and, as a result, adversely affect our profitability.

The Brazilian government regularly implements changes to tax regimes that may increase our and our customers’ tax burdens. These changes include modifications in the rate of assessments and, on occasion, enactment of temporary taxes, the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated governmental purposes. Since April 2003, the Brazilian government has presented several tax reform proposals, which were mainly designed to simplify tax assessments, to avoid internal disputes within and between the Brazilian states and municipalities, and to redistribute tax revenues. The tax reform proposals provided for changes in the rules governing the federal Social Integration Program (Programa de Integração Social), or “PIS,” the federal Contribution for Social Security Financing (Contribuição para Financiamento da Seguridade Social), or “COFINS,” the state Tax on the Circulation of Merchandise and Services (Imposto Sobre a Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços), or “ICMS,” and other taxes. The effects of these proposed tax reform measures and any other changes that result from enactment of additional tax reforms have not been, and cannot be, quantified. However, some of these measures, if enacted, may result in increases in our overall tax burden, which could negatively affect our overall financial performance.

Risks Relating to Our Common Shares and the ADSs

International economic and market conditions, especially in the United States, may adversely affect the market price of the ADSs.

The market for securities issued by Brazilian companies is influenced, to a varying degree, by international economic and market conditions generally. BecauseAs our ADSs are listed ontraded Over the New York Stock Exchange,Counter, or the “NYSE,”“OTC”, adverse market conditions and economic and/or political crises, especially in the United States, such as the

subprime mortgage lending crisis in 2007 and 2008 and the financial and credit crises in 2008, have at times resulted in significant negative impacts on the market price of our ADSs. Despite the fact that our clients, whether financed by us or by Brazilian banks through resources obtained in the local market, arewere not directly exposed to the mortgage lending crisis in the United States, there arewere still uncertainties as to whether such crisis may indirectly affect homebuilders worldwide. The uncertainties generated by the subprime crisis may affect the market prices of our ADSs in future and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.

Developments and the perception of risks in other countries, especially emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market prices of our common shares and the ADSs.

The market for securities issued by Brazilian companies is influenced, to varying degrees, by economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries, especially other Latin American countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, the reaction of investors to developments in one country may cause the capital markets in other countries to fluctuate. Developments or adverse economic conditions in other emerging market countries have at times resulted in significant outflows of funds from, and declines in the amount of foreign currency invested in, Brazil. For example, in 2001, after a prolonged recession, followed by political instability, Argentina announced that it would no longer continue to service its public debt. The economic crisis in Argentina negatively affected investors’ perceptions of Brazilian securities for several years. Economic or political crises in Latin America or other emerging markets may significantly affect perceptions of the risk inherent in investing in the region, including Brazil.

The Brazilian economy is also affected by international economic and general market conditions, especially economic and market conditions in the United States. Share prices on the BM&FBOVESPA,B3, for example, have historically been sensitive to fluctuations in U.S. interest rates as well as movements of the major U.S. stock indexes, particularly in the current worldwide economic downturn. Developments in other countries and securities markets could adversely affect the market prices of our common shares and the ADSs and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.

The relative volatility and the lack of liquidity of the Brazilian securities market may adversely affect you.

The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. This may limit your ability to sell our common shares and the common shares underlying your ADSs at the price and time at which you wish to do so. The BM&FBOVESPA,B3, the only Brazilian stock exchange, had a market capitalization of US$757.0 821 billion as of December 31, 20162018 and an average daily trading volume of US$2.4 2.8 billion for 2016. In comparison, the NYSE had a domestic market capitalization of US$20.2 trillion (excluding funds and non-U.S. companies) as of December 31, 2016 and an average daily trading volume of approximately US$43.9 billion for 2016.2018.

There is also a large concentration in the Brazilian securities market. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented 58.9%60% of the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPAB3 as of December 31, 2016.2018. Gafisa’s average daily trading volume on the BM&FBOVESPA andB3 in the NYSE in 20162018 was US$3.8 million and US$0.5 million, respectively. 4.31 million.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market value of our common shares and the ADSs.

Certain of our shareholders have the ability, subject to applicable Brazilian laws and regulations and applicable securities laws in the relevant jurisdictions, to sell our shares and the ADSs. We cannot predict what effect future sales of our shares or ADSs may have on the market price of our shares or the ADSs. Future sales of substantial amounts of such shares or the ADSs, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market prices of our shares or the ADSs.

The economic value of your investment in our company may be diluted.

We may need additional funds in the future, in order to expand more rapidly, develop new markets, respond to competitive pressures or make acquisitions. Any necessary additional financing may not be available on terms favorable to us. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to meet our business or strategic objectives or compete effectively. If additional funds are raised by our issuing new equity securities existing shareholders may be diluted. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company.”

Since we don’t have a controlling shareholder, we may be subject to takeover by other companies or investors. Pursuant to article 46 of the Company’s Bylaws, any shareholder that holds a participation equal to or greater than 50% of the Company’s share capital is required to make a tender offer for the remaining shares, for consideration equal to at least the fair value as determined by an appaisal report and subject to the regulation provided for in Law No. 6,404/76 of the Brazilian corporate law and applicable CVM regulations on takeovers. In addition, in accordance with Brazilian corporate law, a shareholder that holds a participation equal to or greater than 10% of the Company’s share capital may convene a shareholder meeting to dismiss the management of the Company, and to the extent the other shareholders at such meeting do not vote against a proposal to dismiss or approve such proposal, our management would be dismissed, which would disrupt the day to day operations of the Company and would have an adverse impact on our business and result of operations.

Holders of our common shares or the ADSs may not receive any dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity.

According to our bylaws, we must generally pay our shareholders at least 25% of our annual net profit as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity, as calculated and adjusted under Brazilian corporate law method. This adjusted net profit may be used to absorb losses or for the payment of statutory participation on profits to debenture holders, employees or members of our management, which would ultimately reduce the amount available to be paid as dividends or interest on shareholders’ equity. Additionally, Brazilian corporate law allows a publicly traded company like us to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends in any particular year if our board of directors informs our shareholders that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition or cash availability.

For 2003, 2004 and 2005, we did not distribute dividends. We distributed dividends in each of 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 with respect to the prior respective fiscal year. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year 2012, on April 19, 2013, our shareholders did not approve any distribution of dividends. On December 20, 2013, with the completion of the sale of the Alphaville interest, as fully detailed in item “4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company”, our board of directors approved the payment of interest on equity in the amount of R$130.2 million, representing R$0.3111 per share. Such payment was effective February 12, 2014. On April 25, 2014, our shareholders approved a distribution of dividends in the amount of R$32.9 million, representing R$0.0825 per share. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year 2014, on April 16, 2015, our shareholders did not approve any distribution of dividends. On April 25, 2016, our shareholders approved a distribution of dividends in the amount of R$17.7 million, representing R$0.0481 per share. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year 2016, we expect thatat our annual shareholders’ meeting held on April 28, 2017, our shareholders willdid not approve any distribution of dividends. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year 2017, our shareholders did not approve any distribution of dividends at our annual shareholders'shareholders’ meeting expected to be held on or about April 28, 2017.27, 2018. Based on the negative results of the fiscal year 2018, our shareholders did not approve any distribution of dividends at our annual shareholders’ meeting held on April 24, 2019.

For further information, see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”

Holders of ADSs may find it difficult to exercise voting rights at our shareholders’ meetings.

Holders of ADSs may exercise voting rights with respect to our common shares represented by ADSs only in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement governing the ADSs. Holders of ADSs will face practical limitations in exercising their voting rights because of the additional steps involved in our communications with ADS holders. For example, we are required to publish a notice of our shareholders’ meetings in specified newspapers in Brazil. Holders of our common shares will be able to exercise their voting rights by attending a shareholders’ meeting in person or voting by proxy. By contrast, holders of ADSs will receive notice of a shareholders’ meeting from the ADR depositary following our notice to the depositary requesting the depositary to do so. To exercise their voting rights, holders of ADSs must instruct the ADR depositary on a timely basis. This voting process necessarily will take longer for holders of ADSs than for holders of our common shares. Common shares represented by ADSs for which no timely voting instructions are received by the ADR depositary from the holders of ADSs shall not be voted.

Holders of ADSs also may not receive the voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote the common shares underlying their ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions of the holders of ADSs or for the manner of carrying out those voting instructions. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise voting rights, and they will have little, if any, recourse if the common shares underlying their ADSs are not voted as requested.

No single shareholder or group of shareholders holds more than 50% of our capital stock, which may increase the opportunity for alliances between shareholders as well as conflicts between them.

No single shareholder or group of shareholders holds more than 50% of our capital stock. There is no guidance in Brazilian corporate law for publicly-held companies without an identified controlling shareholder. Due to the absence of a controlling shareholder, we may be subject to future alliances or agreements between our shareholders, which may result in the exercise of a controlling power over our company by them. In the event a controlling group is formed and decides to exercise its controlling power over our company, we may be subject to unexpected changes in our corporate governance and strategies, including the replacement of key executive officers. Additionally, we may be more vulnerable to a hostile takeover bid. The absence of a controlling group may also jeopardize our decision-making process as the minimum quorum required by law for certain decisions by shareholders may not be reached and, as a result, we cannot guarantee that our business plan will be affected. Any unexpected change in our management team, business policy or strategy, any dispute between our shareholders, or any attempt to acquire control of our company may have an adverse impact on our business and result of operations.

Holders of ADSs will not be able to enforce the rights of shareholders under our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law and may face difficulties in protecting their interests because we are subject to different corporate rules and regulations as a Brazilian company.

Holders of ADSs are not direct shareholders of our company and are unable to enforce the rights of shareholders under our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our bylaws and Brazilian corporate law, which differ from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, such as the State of Delaware or New York, or elsewhere outside Brazil. Although insider trading and price manipulation are crimes under Brazilian law, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets or the markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against self-dealing or for preserving shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in Brazil than in the United States and certain other countries, which may put holders of the ADSs at a potential disadvantage. Corporate disclosures also may be less complete or informative than for a public company in the United States or in certain other countries.

Holders of ADSs may face difficulties in serving process on or enforcing judgments against us and other persons.

We are a corporation organized under the laws of Brazil, and all of our directors and executive officers and our independent public accountants reside or are based in Brazil. Most of the assets of our company and of these other persons are located in Brazil. As a result, it may not be possible for holders of ADSs to effect service of process upon us or these other persons within the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil or to enforce against us or these other persons judgments obtained in the United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may be enforced in Brazil only if certain conditions are met, holders may face greater difficulties in protecting their interests in the case of actions by us or our directors or executive officers than would shareholders of a U.S. corporation.

Changes in Brazilian tax laws may have an adverse impact on the taxes applicable to a disposition of the ADSs.

According to Law No. 10,833 of December 29, 2003, the disposition of assets located in Brazil by a non-resident to either a Brazilian resident or a non-resident is subject to taxation in Brazil, regardless of whether the disposition occurs outside or within Brazil. Thus, gains arising from a disposition of our common shares by a non-resident of Brazil to another non-resident of Brazil are subject to income tax.

Although the matter is not entirely clear, we believe it is reasonable to take the position that ADSs do not constitute assets located in Brazil for the purposes of Law No. 10,833/03. Accordingly, the disposition of our ADSs by a non-resident to either a Brazilian resident or a non-resident should not be subject to taxation in Brazil. We cannot assure you, however, that the Brazilian tax authorities or the Brazilian courts will agree with this interpretation. In the event that a disposition of our ADSs is considered a disposition of assets located in Brazil, gains on a disposition of ADSs by a non-resident of Brazil may be subject to income tax in Brazil. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations—Gains.”

Any gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations”) would generally be treated as U.S. source gain or loss for all foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, U.S. Holders will not be able to credit any Brazilian income tax imposed on such gains against their U.S. federal income tax liability unless they have other creditable taxable income from foreign sources in the appropriate foreign tax credit basket. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers as to whether the Brazilian tax on gain would be creditable against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax on foreign-source income from other sources.

There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” for any taxable year, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders of our common shares or ADSs.

In general, a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC for any taxable year if: (1) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income (the “income test”) or (2) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of its assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income (including cash and cash equivalents). Generally, “passive income” includes interest, dividends, rents, royalties and certain gains. For purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation

and received directly its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation. The Company believes that it was not a “passive foreign investment company,” or “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes for its 20162018 taxable year. However, because the Company’s PFIC status is an annual determination that can be made only after the end of each taxable year and will depend on the composition of its income and assets for each such year, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be a PFIC for the current or any other taxable year. Moreover, after the expected spin-off and sale of the Company’s shares of Tenda in 2017, as described in “Item 4. Information on the Company—A. History and Development of the Company—General,” the Company will own less than 25% of Tenda shares and, therefore, the Company’s income and assets will no longer include Tenda’s income and assets for purposes of determining the Company’s PFIC status. On a non-consolidated basis (i.e., without taking into account Tenda’s income), the Company had financial income for the 2016 taxable year in an amount that was substantial relative to its gross margin.  The Company may become a PFIC for any future taxable year if its financial income for any taxable yearexceeds its gross loss or constitutes 75% or more of its gross income (generally, the sum of the Company’s financial income and gross margin)profit for such year.

If the Company were a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. holder owned its common shares or ADSs, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to such U.S. holder. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation——Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

Judgments of Brazilian courts with respect to our common shares will be payable only in reais.

If proceedings are brought in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of the common shares, we will not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other thanreais. Under Brazilian exchange control limitations, an obligation in Brazil to pay amounts denominated in a currency other thanreais may be satisfied in Brazilian currency only at the exchange rate, as determined by the Central Bank, in effect on the date of payment. The exchange rate may not afford non-Brazilian investors with full compensation for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under our common shares or the ADSs.

Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our common shares underlying the ADSs.

Holders of ADSs will be unable to exercise the preemptive rights relating to our common shares underlying ADSs unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act,” is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to the shares relating to these preemptive rights or to take any other action to make preemptive rights available to holders of ADSs. We may decide, in our discretion, not to file any such registration statement. If we do not file a registration statement or if we, after consultation with the ADR depositary, decide not to make preemptive rights available to holders of ADSs, those holders may receive only the net proceeds from the sale of their preemptive rights by the depositary, or if they are not sold, their preemptive rights will be allowed to lapse.

An exchange of ADSs for common shares risks loss of certain foreign currency remittance and Brazilian tax advantages.

The ADSs benefit from the certificate of foreign capital registration, which permits Citibank N.A., as depositary, to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to our common shares into foreign currency, and to remit the proceeds abroad. Holders of ADSs who exchange their ADSs for common shares will then be entitled to rely on the depositary’s certificate of foreign capital registration for five business days from the date of exchange. Thereafter, they will not be able to remit the proceeds abroad unless they obtain their own certificate of foreign capital registration under the terms of Law No. 4,131/62, or unless they qualify under Resolution CMN 4,373, which superseded Resolution CMN No. 2,689, which entitles certain investors to buy and sell shares on Brazilian stock exchanges or organized over-the-counter market and benefit from the certificate of foreign capital registration managed by their authorized representatives in Brazil. See “Item 9. The Offering and Listing—C. Markets—Investment in Our Common Shares by Non-Residents of Brazil.”

If holders of ADSs do not qualify under Resolution CMN 4,373, they will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment on distributions with respect to our common shares. There can be no assurance that the depositary’s certificate of registration or any certificate of foreign capital registration obtained by holders of ADSs will not be affected by future legislative or regulatory changes, or that additional Brazilian law restrictions applicable to their investment in the ADSs may not be imposed in the future.

A portion of the compensation of our officers and members of the senior management is paid in form of stock options, which could tie their interest to the market price of our shares and ADSs.

We have established stock option plans for our officers and members of our senior management. Potential benefits under the stock option plans are tied to the appreciation of the market price of our shares and ADSs.

As a result, our compensation policy may influence our officers and members of the senior management and their interest to the market price of our shares and ADSs, which may conflict with the interests of our shareholders. Our officers and members of the senior management may be influenced to focus on short-term rather than long-term results because a significant portion of their compensation is tied to our results and the market price of our shares and ADSs. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership—Stock Option Plans” in this annual report.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and Development of the Company

General

Gafisa S.A. is a corporation organized under the laws of Brazil. We were incorporated on November 12, 1996 for an indefinite term. Our registered and principal executive offices are located at Av. Nações UnidasPres. Juscelino Kubitschek, No. 8.501, 19th floor, 05425-070,1830, Block 2, 3rd Floor, 04543-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, and our general telephone and fax numbers are + 55 (11) 3025-9000 and + 55 (11) 3025-9242, respectively.

We are a leading diversified national homebuilder serving all demographic segments of the Brazilian market. Established over 60 years ago, we have completed and sold more than 1,100 developments and constructed over 12 million square meters of housing under the Gafisa brand, which we believe is more than any other homebuilder in Brazil. Recognized as one of the foremost professionally-managed homebuilders, we are also one of the best-known brands in the real estate development market, enjoying a reputation among potential homebuyers, brokers, lenders, landowners, and competitors for quality, consistency and professionalism. Our brands include Gafisa, which offersprofessionalism, offering a variety of residential options to the mid to higher income segments, Tenda (currently disclosed as a discontinued operations), which serves the affordable entry-level housing segments and Alphaville (equity method investment), which focuses on the identification, development and sale of high quality residential communities.segments. In addition, we provide construction services to third parties on certain developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain an equity interest.interest, and we also hold an equity interest in Alphaville, which focuses on the identification, development, and sale of high income residential properties.

Our core business is the development of high-quality residential units in attractive locations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 40.7%2018, 100% of the value of our launches was derived from high, mid high- and mid high-levelmid-level residential developments underdevelopments.

We currently operate in São Paulo, having closed our operations in the Gafisa brand. Forcity of Rio de Janeiro in October 2018. Although we still have a small portion of our inventory in Rio de Janeiro, freelance brokers are primarily responsible for marketing these units. In line with this decision, for the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 59.3% of the value of our launches was derived from Tenda, our affordable entry-level housing brand.

Gafisa and Tenda currently operate in several cities, including São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Recife, Belo Horizonte, and Porto Alegre. Many of these developments are located in markets where few large competitors currently operate. For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 36.7%2018, 100% of the value of our launches was derived from our operations outsidein the statesstate of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and from developments related to the “Minha Casa Minha Vida” program under the Tenda brand.Paulo.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we conducted an extensive review of our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries, and our combined business strategy. As a result of this review, the following changes were made: temporary reductions of the activities of the Tenda segment, increase in investments in the Alphaville segment and focus the Gafisa segment on the markets of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

The closing of 2013 marked the completion of Gafisa’s strategic repositioning, which commenced in early 2012. Our goal at the time was clear: we needed to reduce the level of debt and restrict the Company'sCompany’s exposure to unprofitable businesses and markets. This process evolved positively throughout the last two years inperiod on several fronts - fronts—including improvement in margins and cash generation, and culminated with the sale of a 70% interest in Alphaville, which unlocked significant value and contributed to a reduction in the Company'sCompany’s leverage, adjusting its capital structure. At the end of 2013 we finalized the development of our five-year business plan for the period from 2014 to 2018. During the planning process, we set guidelines for the development of our business for the upcoming years, including the expected size of Gafisa and Tenda operations, appropriate leverage, profitability guidelines, and more importantly, our commitment to capital discipline and shareholder value generation, which are reflected in the

guidance released to the market at the end of 2013. Gafisa S.A. completed the sale of a majority interest in Alphaville Urbanismo S.A. (“Alphaville”), the leading residential community development company in Brazil, to Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações (“Fundo AE”), which has as shareholders Pátria Investimentos and Blackstone Real Estate Advisor, which was announced on June 7, 2013. The transaction values Alphaville at an equity value of R$2.0 billion. The cash sale to Pátria and Blackstone resulted in Fundo AE owning 70% of Alphaville, with Gafisa retaining the remaining 30%. All precedent conditions were met including governmental approval, to the completion of the transaction. The transaction was concluded on December 9, 2013, with a sale of a 50% interest by Gafisa and a 20% interest by Construtora Tenda S.A. (“Tenda”), with Gafisa retaining the remaining 30% of Alphaville capital stock. Following this transaction and since December 2013, Alphaville is no longer consolidated in the financial statements of the Company.

The Company’s results of operations reflect the results of operations of Alphaville for the period January 1 to November 30, 2013 which are presented in the line item “Results from discontinued operations”.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company held two business combination transactions, as follows:

On February 27, 2013, the Company implemented a business combination through an asset swap in which the Company swapped its 50% interest in the jointly-controlled entity SPE Reserva Ecoville in exchange for a 50% controlling interest in SPE Parque Ecoville at a R$59.9 million fair value. As a result, we recorded an adjustment to inventory of R$22.6 million.

On September 12, 2013, the Company implemented a business combination through which it obtained control of Manhattan Square Empreendimentos Imobiliarios Comercial 02 (“MC 02”) and Manhattan Square Empreendimentos Imobiliarios Residencial 02 (“MR 02”). These two entities were previously jointly controlled and the Company held a 50% interest in both entities. As a result of this acquisition, the Company now holds a 100% interest. The combined purchase price was R$64.7 million and was paid on September 12, 2013. As a result of this transaction, the Company allocated the amount of R$62.3 million recorded as fair value adjustment to inventory.

On February 2, 2014, Gafisa’s board of directors authorized management to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of Gafisa and Tenda business units into two independent publicly traded companies. Our management initiated the studies in the first quarter of 2014.

During 2014, we revised our 2014 launch guidance for the Gafisa segment as a result of weakening economic conditions in Brazil. This revision in the projected volume of launches affected guidance for the Administrative Expenses to Launch Volumes ratio for the Gafisa segment, as well as projected consolidated launches.

During 2015, we did not issue a launch guidance for the Tenda segment or the Gafisa segment as a result of the continuing weakening economic conditions and political instability in Brazil. High interest rates, high rates of inflation and an increase in levels of unemployment, among other factors, had an adverse impact on the real estate market, including the Gafisa segment, resulting in a sharp decrease in the overall volume of real estate launches in Brazil.

Consequently, we adopted a conservative approach to launches, seeking to balance the level of launches of new products in the market by prioritizing ventures with more liquidity, with the aim to reach stable sales and profitability levels. In contrast, and despite the continuing weakening economic conditions in Brazil, we were able to expand the Tenda segment of our business, which focuses on the low-income market.

During 2015, as part of the spin-off studies, we (i) separated several joint departments of Gafisa and Tenda, including, among others, the services, personnel and management department and the legal department, (ii) converted Tenda’s issuer registration with the CVM from category B to category A, (iii) entered into negotiations with several banks and insurance companies to open lines of credit for Tenda that are independent of Gafisa, and (iv) reviewed our contracts with our third party counterparties and evaluated the potential impact of a spin-off on those contracts. On April 29, 2015, we announced to the market that the spin-off studies were ongoing and would take longer to be concluded than had been initially expected.

During 2016, we did not issue a launch guidance for the Tenda segment or the Gafisa segment as a result of the continuing weakening economic conditions and political instability in Brazil.

On August 16, 2016, we announced to the market that that the spin-off studies were ongoing and that we were evaluating other potential capital structure options and separation alternatives for the Gafisa and Tenda business units, including a potential offer of securities and/or a sale of equity interests, in addition to the spin-off itself.

In December 2016, following the conclusion of our analysis of certain strategic options, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock, and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction in our total capital stock. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, we entered into the SPA with Jaguar pursuant to which we willwould sell Tenda shares representing up to 30% of the total capital stock of Tenda, at a price equal to R$8.13 per share. Pursuant

During 2017, we did not issue a launch guidance for Gafisa as a result of the continuing weakening economic conditions and political instability in Brazil. Accordingly, we adopted a conservative approach to launches, focusing on the sale of inventory.

The spin-off of the Tenda business unit was consummated on May 4, 2017, following: (i) a reduction of the capital stock of Tenda (without the cancellation of shares), pursuant to which Gafisa, as sole shareholder at that time, received R$100 million (adjusted by the SELIC); (ii) a reduction of the capital stock of Gafisa, resulting in the distribution to Gafisa shareholders of shares corresponding to 50% of the capital stock of Tenda; (iii) the conclusion of the preemptive rights exercise pursuant to which Gafisa shareholders acquired up to 50% of the total share capital of Tenda, at the price per share set forth in the SPA we will receive cash proceeds totalingwith Jaguar and for a total amount of R$231.7219.5 million, valuing Tenda’s capital stock at R$539.0 million.with no shares being acquired by Jaguar; and (iv) the satisfaction of other conditions precedent for the consummation of the spin-off. In addition, on May 4, 2017, the Tenda shares were listed on the B3 and began to publicly trade.

During 2018, we did not issue a launch guidance for Gafisa as a result of the economic conditions and political instability in Brazil.

On September 25, 2018, at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting held at the request of GWI Asset Management S.A. , the shareholders resolved to (i) remove by majority vote all of the members of the Board of Directors and (ii) elect new Board members by means of a multiple-vote process. Accordingly, at a Board of Directors’ meeting on September 28, 2018, the following resolutions were passed as part of the turnaround process and the optimization of the Company’s structure: (i) the withdrawals of chief executive officer, chief financial and investor relations officer and chief operating officer and the election of new statutory officers; (ii) the adoption of measures to approve the Company’s headquarters relocation; (iii) the closure of our branch located in the city of Rio de Janeiro and (iv) the approval of the Company’s share buyback program.

An auction of 14,600,000 shares held by the Company’s shareholder, GWI Asset Management S.A took place on February 14, 2019, corresponding to an interest of 33.67% in the Company’s ownership structure. As a result of this auction, Planner Corretora de Valores S.A., through investment funds managed by it, acquired 8,000,000 common shares corresponding to 18.45% of the total common shares issued by the Company.

On October 21, 2019, we informed our shareholders and the market that we entered into a Purchase and Sale, Stock Redemption, Corporate Restructuring Agreement with Alphaville Urbanismo S.A., Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações S.A. and affiliates of PEAE, setting forth the terms and conditions for the sale of our shares in Alphaville. As of the date of this annual report, we estimatehold 21.20% of Alphaville’s shares, a decrease from our previous 30% stake, as a result of a capital increase in Alphaville by affiliates of PEAE. The sale price totals R$100

million, payable through credit offsets and the potential spin-offdelivery of certain assets. The consummation of the Gafisatransaction is subject to customary conditions precedent, including a corporate restructuring of certain assets of Alphaville, the obtainment of third party consents and Tenda business units will be concludedcorporate approvals. This transaction is in May or June 2017.line with the Company’s strategy to optimize and improve the Company’s portfolio and capital allocation, aiming at creating value for our shareholders.

Our common shares are listed on the BM&FBOVESPAB3 under the symbol “GFSA3” and the ADSs are listed ontraded OTC in the NYSEUnited States under the symbol “GFA.”“GFASY”.

Our agent for service of process in the United States is National Corporate Research, Ltd. located at 10 East 40th Street, 10th floor, New York, NY 10016.

Historical Background and Recent Developments

Gomes de Almeida Fernandes Ltda., or “GAF,” was established in 1954 in the city of Rio de Janeiro with operations in the real estate markets in the cities of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. In December 1997, GP Investimentos S.A. and its affiliates, or “GP,” entered into a partnership with the shareholders of GAF to create Gafisa S.A. In 2004, as a result of a corporate restructuring, GP assumed a controlling position in our company. In 2005, an affiliate of Equity International Management, LLC, or “Equity International,” acquired approximately 32% of our company through a capital contribution. In February 2006, we concluded our initial public offering in Brazil, resulting in a public float of approximately 47% of our total share capital at the conclusion of the offering.

In September 2006, we created Gafisa Vendas Intermediação Imobiliária Ltda., or “Gafisa Vendas,” to function as our internal sales division in the state of São Paulo and in February 2007, we created a branch of Gafisa Vendas in Rio de Janeiro, or “Gafisa Vendas Rio,” to function as our internal sales division in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro.

In October 2006, we entered into an agreement with Alphaville Participações S.A. to acquire 100% of Alphaville, one of the largest residential community development companies in Brazil in terms of units and square meters, focused on the identification, development and sale of high quality residential communities in the metropolitan regions throughout Brazil targeted at upper and upper-middle income families. On January 8, 2007, we successfully completed the acquisition of 60% of Alphaville’s shares for R$198.4 million, of which R$20 million was paid in cash and the remaining R$178.4 million was paid in exchange for 6.4 million common shares of Gafisa. On May 27, 2010, the shareholders of Gafisa approved the acquisition of 20% of Alphaville’s shares for the total amount of R$126.5 million, through the merger of Shertis Empreendimentos e Participações S.A. or “Shertis”, which main asset were 20% of Alphaville’s shares. As a consequence of such merger, Gafisa issued 9,797,792 common shares, paid to the former shareholders of Shertis.

On March 17, 2007, we concluded our initial public offering of common shares in the United States, resulting in a public float of 78.6% of our total share capital at the conclusion of the offering. Upon completion of the offering, entities related to Equity International and GP controlled 14.2% and 7.3% of our total capital stock, respectively. In June 2007, Brazil Development Equity Investments, LLC, a company affiliated with GP, sold its remaining interest in our company (7.1% of our capital stock at the time).

On March 15, 2007, we created a new wholly-owned subsidiary, Fit Residencial Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda., or “FIT,” for the development, construction and management of lower and lower-middle income residential projects. On October 21, 2008, Gafisa and Tenda concluded a business combination in which FIT was merged into Tenda. The purpose of the merger was to consolidate the activities of FIT and Tenda in the lower-income segment in Brazil focused on developing real estate units with an average price of less than R$200.0 thousand. As a result of the business combination, Gafisa became the owner of 60.0% of the total and voting capital stock of Tenda. On December 30, 2009, the shareholders of Gafisa and Tenda approved a corporate restructuring to consolidate Gafisa’s non-controlling share ownership in Tenda. The restructuring was accomplished by exchanging all of the remaining Tenda shares not held by Gafisa into Gafisa shares. As a result of the restructuring, Tenda became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gafisa. On October 26, 2007, Gafisa acquired 70% of Cipesa Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A., a leading homebuilder in the State of Alagoas at the time.

On October 1, 2010, Equity International sold its remaining interest in our company.

On June 8, 2012, according to the material fact then disclosed, the third phase of the Investment Agreement and Other Covenants entered into on October 2, 2006 (“Investment Agreement”), established the rules and conditions for Gafisa related to the acquisition of the remaining 20% interest in the capital stock of Alphaville not held by the Company. While the valuation of the capital stock has been agreed by both parties, the number of shares that shall be

issued by the Company to settle this transaction is being decided in arbitration proceedings initiated by the minority shareholders of Alphaville, according to the material fact we released on July 3, 2012. There is an embedded derivative component to the Investment Agreement, relating to the Company’s obligation to purchase the Alphaville shares held by the non-controlling interest. As the fair value of this embedded derivative for all reporting periods has no significant value, since the future settlement of the derivative will be based on the fair value of Alphaville’s capital stock, no derivative asset or liability has been recorded. The future settlement to be made in cash or shares represented an amount of R$359.0 million as at December 31, 2012 and 2011. If 70,251,551 common shares of Gafisa are issued to the other shareholders of Alphaville, these shareholders will receive 13.96% of Gafisa’s total capital stock. On June 7, 2013, according to the material fact then disclosed, Gafisa entered into an agreement to sell a 70% interest in Alphaville to Blackstone and Patria and also agreed to complete the purchase of the outstanding 20% interest in Alphaville, finalizing the arbitration process.

On July 3, 2013, Gafisa completed the purchase of the outstanding 20% interest in Alphaville, belonging to Alphapar, resulting in the Company holding 100% of Alphaville’s capital stock. This transaction resulted in a temporary increase in the Company’s leverage to 126% (Net Debt/Equity) and it was financed partially through Company’Company’s cash in addition to funding of R$250 million in June. The total disbursement was made in July in the amount of R$366.6 million.

On December 9, 2013, Gafisa announced the completion of the agreement to sell a 70% interest in Alphaville to private equity firms Blackstone and Pátria. Gafisa retained a 30% interest. The sale valued Alphaville at R$2.0 billion. The proceeds from the transaction totaled R$1.54 billion, of which R$1.25 billion was received through the sale of shares, and R$290 million was received as a dividend distributed by Alphaville.

On February 2, 2014, Gafisa’s board of directors authorized management to initiate studies for a potential spin-off of Gafisa and Tenda business units into two independent publicly traded companies. Our management initiated the studies in the first quarter of 2014.

During 2014, we also revised our 2014 launch guidance for the Gafisa segment as a result of weakening economic conditions in Brazil. We did not issue a launch guidance for the Gafisa segment or the Tenda segment during 2015, 2016 and 20162017 due to the continuing weakening economic conditions and political instability in Brazil.

During 2015 and 2016, we implemented several initiatives in connection with the potential spin-off. During 2016, our management decided to sell 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock, and transfer the remaining 50% of Tenda’s total capital stock to our shareholders in connection with a reduction in our total capital stock, and implement the spin-off. The spin-off pursuant toof the SPA.Tenda business unit was consummated on May 4, 2017. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—“—A. History and Development of the Company—General” for further information.

On March 23, 2017, the Company conducted a reverse split of common shares issued by the Company, at the ratio of 13.483023074 to 1, and proportional adjustment to the limit of authorized capital. As of the date of this annual report, the share capital is comprised of 28,040,162 common, registered and non-par value shares.

On December 20, 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting a capital increase of up to R$300.0 million, with the option to approve a partial capital increase of up to R$200.0 million to be subscribed for through the issuance of a minimum of 13,333,333 new common shares and a maximum of 20,000,000 new common shares in the Company, all in registered, book-entry form, and with no par value, at a price per share equal to R$15.00, of which R$0.01 per share would be allocated to capital, and R$14.99 per share would be allocated to capital reserves. This capital increase is part of the Company’s strategy to reinforce its liquidity, strengthen its capital structure and solidify the Company’s strategic and operational positioning for a new cycle of the real estate market. Following the preemptive rights exercise period, which expired on January 19, 2018, and the subsequent subscription periods that expired on February 2, 2018 and February 21, 2018, respectively, we issued and sold 16,717,752 new common shares of the Company for a total amount of R$250.8 million, all in registered, book-entry form, and with no par value, at a price per share equal to R$15.00, of which R$0.01 per share was allocated to capital, and R$14.99 per share was allocated to capital reserves. Accordingly, on February 28, 2018, our board of directors approved a capital and capital reserve increase in the amount of R$250.8 million.

At the end of 2017 and in the beginning of 2018, GWI Group, a private property investment company and asset management fund founded by South Korean national Mu Hak You, began to acquire a large number of shares in the Company. On January 31, 2018, following several purchases of Company shares, the GWI Group had a 30.45% interest in the Company’s share capital.

On September 21, 2018, GWI Group acquired an additional number of shares, increasing its interest to 37.32% in the Company’s share capital.GWI informed us that this share acquisition was made for investment purposes and in order to restructure part of the Company’s Board. On September 25, 2018, GWI convened an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting for the purpose of dismissing members of the Board of Directors and electing new members through a multiple-vote process. GWI approved the dismissal of the entire Board of Directors and elected directors for five of the seven vacant seats. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices”, for further information about our Board of Directors. Within three days of the dismissal and election of the new Board of Directors, the Company’s executive board was removed from office. On September 28, 2018, our Board of Directors approved the establishment of the Company’s share buyback program with the objective of generating value for the Company’s shareholders. Shares purchased by the Company as part of the buyback program will be held in treasury, and may subsequently be canceled, sold and/or used in connection with the exercise of stock options granted by the Company. The maximum number of shares the Company may acquire under this program is 3,516,970 common shares, pursuant to Article 8 of CVM Instruction No. 567/15. This buyback program ends on October 1, 2019. Under our current shares repurchase program, any acquisition by us of our own shares must be made on a stock exchange and cannot be made by means of a private transaction. See “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Bylaws—Purchases by us of our own Shares”, for further information. Such events were discussed at length in the media, which led to variations in the market price of our shares.

On November 26, 2018, our Board of Directors approved the voluntary delisting of our ADSs from the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and a proposal to maintain our ADR facility as a Level 1 ADR program to enable investors to retain their ADSs. On December 7, 2018, we filed a Form 25 with the SEC to effect the delisting of the ADSs, and sent a copy to the NYSE on the same day. The last day of trading on NYSE for our ADSs was December 14, 2018, and our ADSs were delisted from the NYSE on December 17, 2018. Our ADSs remain eligible for trading in the over-the-counter markets in the United States, and our common shares will continue to be listed and admitted to trading in the Novo Mercado segment of the B3. In addition to the information we are required to report under applicable Brazilian regulations, we intend to continue publishing English translations of our annual report, interim results and communications on our investor relations website at (www.ri.gafisa.com.br), in accordance with Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Exchange Act. In the Extraordinary shareholders meeting held in April 2019, the measures taken for the voluntary delisting of Gafisa’s shares from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the change of the American Depositary Shares program from a Level 3 to a Level 1 program were not ratified.

On December 19, 2018, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 1,030,325 of the Company’s common shares, without reduction in our capital stock.

On January 22, 2019, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of 370,000 of the Company’s common shares, without reduction in our capital stock. The Company also disclosed to the market a Material Fact stating that the GWI Group had acquired Company shares representing more than 50% in the Company’s share capital. Pursuant to article 46 of the Company’s Bylaws, any shareholder that holds a participation equal to or greater than 50% of the Company’s share capital is required to make a Tender Offer for the remaining shares. Accordingly, shortly thereafter, GWI Group, without making a Tender Offer, sold a small portion of its shares in order to maintain a participation of less than 50% in the Company’s share capital. Following queries for clarification by the Company, CVM and B3 about these transactions involving the Company’s share capital, GWI Group confirmed that the GWI acquisition of more than 50% of the Company’s share capital was not intentional and, therefore, did not trigger the Tender Offer requirement provided for in the Company Bylaws.

By February 14, 2019, GWI Group had sold, throughauction in the capital markets, a 33.67% interest it held in the Company’s share capital. As a result, GWI Group ceased to control the Company and reduced its interest in the Company’s share capital to 7.70%. Furthermore, Planner Corretora de Valores S.A. in the same date, through investment funds managed by it, purchased shares corresponding to 18.45% of the total share capital of the Company.

The GWI Group traded in our shares in early 2019, giving rise to several requests for information by CVM and B3 with respect to compliance with the Tender Offer requirement provided for in the Company’s Bylaws. The Company responded to such requests on March 21, 2019 and, as of the date of this annual report, has no knowledge of any further action to be taken by CVM regarding this issue. The Company understands that, as the GWI Group is no longer a relevant shareholder and their representatives are no longer part of the Company’s management, the Company should not be subject to any further sanctions and will keep its shareholders and the market informed of any developments in that regard.

During February, March and April 2019, the members of the Company’s Board of Directors elected in late 2018 resigned, with the exception of Pedro Carvalho de Mello, and new members were elected to replace them.

As of the date of this annual report, following the Annual General Meeting held on April 15, 2019, Gafisa’s Board of Directors is composed of the following members: (i) Leo Julian Simpson (nominated as chairman of the Board of Directors on April 15, 2019), (ii) Antonio Carlos Romanoski, (iii) Demian Fiocca, (iv) Eduardo Larangeira Jácome, (v) Nelson Sequeiros Rodriguez Tanure, (vi) Roberto Luz Portella and (vii) Thomas Cornelius Azevedo Reichenheim, all nominated on April 15, 2019.

On April 15, 2019, at the Annual General Meeting, the shareholders resolved to suspend the shareholder rights of GWI Asset Management S.A. and the other members of the GWI Group due to GWI Group’s non-compliance with the Company’s Bylaws as they relate to the Tender Offer request. In addition, it was resolved to increase the limit of authorized capital of the Company from 71,031,876 ordinary shares to 120,000,000 ordinary shares. This increase in the Company’s authorized capital enables us to issue new shares in a sufficient amount to accommodate the financial restructuring of the Company.

On April 15, 2019, following the General Meeting, in order to raise funds for investments, the newly appointed Board of Directors approved a capital increase of 26,273,962 new common shares. These newly issued common shares were offered privately to the Company’s shareholders at the B3, and were issued at the reference price of R$6.02 per common share (which was determined following an audit conducted by a specialized firm). The Board of Directors also appointed Roberto Luz Portella as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer and Eduardo Larangeira Jácome as Operational Executive Officer. Following the preemptive rights exercise period, and the subsequent subscription periods, we issued and sold 12,170,035 and 14,103,927 new common shares of the Company for a total amount of R$62.3 million and R$70.0 million, respectively, all in registered, book-entry form, and with no par value, at a price per share equal to R$5.12 and R$4.96, respectively. Accordingly, on June 24, 2019, our board of directors approved a capital increase in the amount of R$132.3 million.

On August 15, 2019, the Board of Directors approved a capital increase of 48,968,124 new common shares. These newly issued common shares were offered privately to the Company’s shareholders at the B3, and were issued at the reference price of R$6.57 per common share (which was determined following an audit conducted by a specialized firm). Following the preemptive rights exercise period and subsequent subscriptions periods, we issued and sold 45.554.148 and 3,413,976 new common shares of the Company for a total amount of R$254.2 million and R$18.5 million, respectively, all in registered, book-entry form, and with no par value, at a price per share equal to R$5.58 and R$5.42, respectively. Accordingly, on October 23, 2019, our board of directors approved a capital increase in the amount of R$272.7 million.As of the date of this annual report, the share capital of the Company totaled R$2,926.3 million, represented by 120,000,000 common shares, all in registered, book-entry form, and with no par value.

On August 30, 2019 the Board of Directors appointed André Luis Ackermann as Chief Financial Officer, andEduardo Larangeira Jácome tendered his resignation as Management Officer, effective as of September 30, 2019. Eduardo Larangeira Jácome will remain as a member of the Restructuring Committee until December 31, 2019 and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

In addition, on September 20, 2019, Roberto Luz Portella resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer and Inverstor Relations Officer. Following his resignation, on September 23, 2019, the Board of Directors appointed André Luis Ackermann as Investor Relations Officer.

On October 21, 2019, we informed our shareholders and the market that we entered into a Purchase and Sale, Stock Redemption, Corporate Restructuring Agreement with Alphaville Urbanismo S.A., Private Equity AE Investimentos e Participações S.A. and affiliates of PEAE, setting forth the terms and conditions for the sale of our shares in Alphaville. As of the date of this annual report, we hold 21.20% of Alphaville’s shares, a decrease from our previous 30% stake, as a result of a capital increase in Alphaville by affiliates of PEAE. The sale price totals R$100 million, payable through credit offsets and the delivery of certain assets. The consummation of the transaction is subject to customary conditions precedent, including a corporate restructuring of certain assets of Alphaville, the obtainment of third party consents and corporate approvals. This transaction is in line with the Company’s strategy to optimize and improve the Company’s portfolio and capital allocation, aiming at creating value for our shareholders.

Capital Expenditures

In 2018, under the Gafisa brand, we invested R$12.5 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment, software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales stands, which amounted to R$9.7 million.

In 2017, under the Gafisa brand, we invested R$20.5 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment, software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales stands and software acquisitions, which amounted to R$7.3 million and R$6.4 million, respectively.

In 2016, under the Gafisa brand, we invested R$35.8 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment, software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales stands and software acquisitions, which amounted to R$10.8 million and R$7.8 million, respectively.

In 2015, under the Gafisa and Tenda brands, we invested R$54.6 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment, software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales stands and software acquisitions, which amounted to R$9.4 million and R$22.7 million, respectively.

In 2014, under the Gafisa and Tenda brands, we invested R$88.5 million in machinery and equipment, information technology equipment, software, project planning and information technology projects. Our main investments during the period were related to sales stands and software acquisitions, which amounted to R$19.3 million and R$10.9 million, respectively.

Our capital expenditures are all made in Brazil and are usually funded by financings through local debt capital markets. We currently do not have any significant capital expenditures in progress.

B. Business Overview

General Overview

We believe we are one of Brazil’s leading homebuilders. For over more than 60 years, Gafisa has been recognized as one of the foremost professionally-managed homebuilders, having completed and sold more than 1,100 developments and constructed over 12 million square meters of housing, which we believe is more than any other residential development company in Brazil. We believe our brands “Gafisa,” “and “Tenda” arebrand “Gafisa” is a well-known brandsbrand in the Brazilian real estate development market, enjoying a reputation among potential homebuyers, brokers, lenders, landowners and competitors for quality, consistency and professionalism.

Our core business is the development of high-quality residential units in attractive locations. For the year ended December 31, 2016, 40.7%2018, 49% of the value of our launches was derived from high and mid high-level residential developments under the Gafisa brand.developments. In addition, we also provide construction services to third parties on certain developments in the Gafisa segment where we retain an equity interest. For the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 59.3% of the value of our consolidated launches was derived from the Tenda brand, our affordable entry-level housing brand. We are currently operating mainly in several cities, including São Paulo Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Recife Belo Horizonte and Porto Alegreits metropolitan area which represents approximately 14%10.3% of the national population and approximately 21%17.7% of the gross domestic product as of December 31, 2014. Many of these developments are located in markets where few large competitors currently operate. For the year ended December 31, 2016 approximately 34.9% of our launches were derived from our operations outside the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and from developments related to the “Minha Casa Minha Vida” program under the Tenda brand.(latest available information).

Our Markets

We are present in 48 municipalities throughout Brazil, including Barueri, Belém, Belo Horizonte, Betim, Brasília, Camaçari, Camaragibe, Campinas, Campos dos Goytacazes, Canoas, Cotia, Cuiabá, Curitiba, Goiânia, Governador Valadares, Gramado, Guarujá, Guarulhos, Itaquaquecetuba, Itu, Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Jundiaí, Lauro de Freitas, Macaé, Maceió, Manaus, Niterói, Nova Iguaçu, Osasco, Paulista, Porto Alegre, Porto Velho, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Santa Luzia, Santo André, Santos, São Bernardo do Campo, São Caetano do Sul, São Gonçalo, São José dos Campos, São Leopoldo, São Luís, São Paulo, Sete Lagoas, Vespasiano and Volta Redonda.

Our Gafisa brand is presenthave developed real estate projects in 30 municipalities throughout Brazil, including Barueri, Belém, Campinas, Cuiabá, Curitiba, Goiânia, Gramado, Guarujá, Guarulhos, Itu, Jundiaí, Macaé, Maceió, Manaus, Niterói, Nova Iguaçu, Osasco, Porto Alegre, Porto Velho, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Santo André, Santos, São Bernardo do Campo, São Caetano do Sul, São Gonçalo, São Jose dos Campos, São Luís, São Paulo and Volta Redonda.

Our Real Estate Activities

Our real estate business includes the following activities:

The table below sets forth our potential sales value, generated from new developments for each of our real estate activities and as a percentage of total real estate amount generated during the periods presented: