Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 20-F

o    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
ý    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102012
OR
o    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
o    SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report
For the transition period from                           to                           

Commission file number: 1-13422


AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrant's Name into English)

Ontario, Canada
(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

145 King Street East, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2Y7
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

R. Gregory Laing
145 King Street East, Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2Y7
Telephone: 416-947-1212 Fax: 416-367-4681
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Shares, without par value
(Title of Class)
 The Toronto Stock Exchange and
the New York Stock Exchange
(Name of exchange on which registered)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

168,720,355172,006,593 Common Shares as of December 31, 20102012

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes    ý            No        o

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act.

Yes    o            No        ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes    ý            No        o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes    ý            No        o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large Accelerated Filerý        Accelerated Filero        Non-Accelerated Filer o

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAPý        International Financial Reporting Standards as issued        Other o
        by the International Accounting Standards Board o

If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17    o            Item 18    o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes    o            No    ý





TABLE OF CONTENTS

  
 
  Page 
  
 
PRELIMINARY NOTE 1 

 
NOTE TO INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESOURCES 2 

 
  Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources 2 

 
  Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources 2 

 
NOTE TO INVESTORS CONCERNING CERTAIN MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE 3 

 
PART I 4 

 
 ITEM 1      IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS 4*

 
 ITEM 2      OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE 4*

 
 ITEM 3      KEY INFORMATION 45 

 
  Selected Financial Data 45 

 
  Currency Exchange Rates 56 

 
  Risk Factors 67 

 
 ITEM 4      INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY 1517 

 
  History and Development of the Company 1517 

 
  Business Overview 1921 

 
  Mining Legislation and Regulation 2022 

 
  Organizational Structure 2325 

 
  Property, Plant and Equipment 2427

Glossary of Selected Mining Terms85 

 
 ITEM 4A    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 7991 

 
 ITEM 5      OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS 7992 

 
 ITEM 6      DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES 110126 

 
 ITEM 7      MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 133151 

 
  Major Shareholders 133151 

 
  Related Party Transactions 133152 

 
 ITEM 8      FINANCIAL INFORMATION 133152 

 
  Dividend Policy 133152 

 
 ITEM 9      THE OFFER AND LISTING 134153 

 
  Market and Listing Details 134153 

 
 ITEM 10    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 136156 

 
  Memorandum and Articles of IncorporationAmalgamation 136156 

 
  Disclosure of Share Ownership 138158 

 
  Material Contracts 138159 

 
  Exchange Controls 142

Restrictions on Share Ownership by Non-Canadians142163 

 

i

Table of Contents


  Corporate GovernanceRestrictions on Share Ownership by Non-Canadians 143163 

 
  Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations 143163 

 
  United States Federal Income Tax Considerations 144164 

 
  Audit FeesCease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions 146167 

 
  Available Documents 147167 

 
 ITEM 11    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 147168 

 
 ITEM 12    DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES 149

PART II150169 

 
 ITEM 13    DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES 150170 

 
 ITEM 14    MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS 150170 

 
 ITEM 15    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 150170 

 
 ITEM 15T  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 151171 

 
 ITEM 16A  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT 151171 

 
 ITEM 16B  CODE OF ETHICS 151171 

 
 ITEM 16C  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 151171 

 
 ITEM 16D  EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES 151172 

 
 ITEM 16E  PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS 151172 

 
 ITEM 16F  CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT 151172 

 
 ITEM 16G  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 151172

ITEM 16H  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE172 

 
PART IIIII 152173 

 
 ITEM 17    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 152173**

 
 ITEM 18    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 152173 

 
 ITEM 19    EXHIBITS 200229 

 
SIGNATURES 201230 

 
*
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction E(b) of Form 20-F.

**
Pursuant to General Instruction E(c) of Form 20-F, theThe registrant has elected to provideprovides the financial statements and related information specified in Item 18.

ii

Table of Contents



PRELIMINARY NOTE

Currencies:    Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited ("Agnico-Eagle" or the "Company") presents its consolidated financial statements in United States dollars. All dollar amounts in this Annual Report on Form 20-F ("Form 20-F") are stated in United States dollars ("U.S. dollars", "$" or "US$"), except where otherwise indicated. Certain information in this Form 20-F is presented in Canadian dollars ("C$") or European Union euros ("Euro" or "€"). See "Item 3 Key Information – Currency Exchange Rates" for a history of exchange rates of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles:    Agnico-Eagle reports its financial results using United States generally accepted accounting principles ("US GAAP") due to its substantial U.S. shareholder base and to maintain comparability with other gold mining companies. Unless otherwise specified, all references to financial results herein are to those calculated under US GAAP.

Forward-Looking Information:    Certain statements in this Form 20-F, referred to herein as "forward-looking statements", constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" under the provisions of Canadian provincial securities laws. These statements relate to, among other things, the Company's plans, objectives, expectations, estimates, beliefs, strategies and intentions and can generally be identified by the use of words such as "anticipate", "believe", "budget", "could", "estimate", "expect", "forecast", "intend", "likely", "may", "plan", "project", "schedule", "should", "target", "will", "would" or other variations of these terms or similar words. Forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the following:

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Agnico-Eagle as of the date of such statements, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. The factors and assumptions of Agnico-Eagle upon which the forward-looking statements in this Form 20-F are based, and which may prove to be incorrect, include, but are not limited to, the assumptions set out elsewhere in this Form 20-F as well as: that there are no significant disruptions affecting Agnico-Eagle's operations, whether due to labour disruptions, supply disruptions, damage to equipment, natural or man-made occurrences, mining or milling issues, political changes, title issues or otherwise; that permitting, development and expansion at each of Agnico-Eagle's mines

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            1

Table of Contents



expansion at each of Agnico-Eagle's mines and mine development projects proceed on a basis consistent with current expectations, and that Agnico-Eagle does not change its exploration or development plans relating to such projects; that the exchange rates between the Canadian dollar, Euro, Mexican peso and the U.S. dollar will be approximately consistent with current levels or as set out in this Form 20-F; that prices for gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead will be consistent with Agnico-Eagle's expectations; that prices for key mining and construction supplies, including labour costs, remain consistent with Agnico-Eagle's current expectations; that production meets expectations; that Agnico-Eagle's current estimates of mineral reserves, mineral resources, mineral grades and mineral recovery are accurate; that there are no material delays in the timing for completion of development projects; and that there are no material variations in the current tax and regulatory environment that affect Agnico-Eagle.

The forward-looking statements in this Form 20-F reflect the Company's views as at the date of this Form 20-F and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the Risk Factors set forthout in "Item 3 Key Information – Risk Factors". Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as otherwise required by law, the Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such statements to reflect any change in the Company's expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. This Form 20-F contains information regarding anticipated total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and minesite costs per tonne at certain of the Company's mines and mine development projects. The Company believes that these generally accepted industry measures are realistic indicators of operating performance and are useful in allowing year over year comparisons. Investors are cautioned that this information may not be suitable for other purposes.

Meaning of "including" and "such as":    When used in this Form 20-F, the terms "including" and "such as" mean including and such as, without limitation.


NOTE TO INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESOURCES

The mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates contained in this Form 20-F have been prepared in accordance with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities' (the "CSA") National Instrument 43-101Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). These standards are similar to those used by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC"(the "SEC") Industry Guide No. 7, as interpreted by Staff at the SEC ("Guide 7"). However, the definitions in NI 43-101 differ in certain respects from those under Guide 7. Accordingly, mineral reserve information contained or incorporated by reference herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. Under the requirements of the SEC, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. The SEC does not recognize measures of "mineral resource".

The metal grades reported in the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates represent in-place grades and do not reflect losses in the recovery process, that is, the metallurgical losses associated with processing the extracted ore. The mineral reserve figures presented herein are estimates, and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved or that the indicated level of recovery will be realized. The Company does not include equivalent gold ounces for byproduct metals contained in mineral reserves in its calculation of contained ounces.


Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

This document uses the terms "measured mineral resources" and "indicated mineral resources". Investors are advised that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them.Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into mineral reserves.


Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources

This document uses the term "inferred mineral resources". Investors are advised that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it. "Inferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that any part or all of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

2            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



NOTE TO INVESTORS CONCERNING CERTAIN MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE

This Form 20-F presents certain measures, including "total cash costs per ounce" and "minesite costs per tonne", that are not recognized measures under US GAAP. This data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. For a reconciliation of these measures to the figures presented in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP, see "Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Results of Operations – Production Costs". The Company believes that these generally accepted industry measures are realistic indicators of operating performance and are useful in allowing year over year comparisons. However, both of these non-US GAAP measures should be considered together with other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP, and these measures, taken by themselves, are not necessarily indicative of operating costs or cash flow measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. This Form 20-F also contains information as to estimated future total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and minesite costs per tonne. The estimates of total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and minesite costs per tonne for projects under development. These estimates are based upon the total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and minesite costs per tonne that the Company expects to incur to mine gold at thoseits projects and, consistent with the reconciliation provided, do not include production costs attributable to accretion expense and other asset retirement costs, which will vary over time as each project is developed and mined. It is therefore not practicable to reconcile these forward-looking non-US GAAP financial measures to the most comparable US GAAP measure.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            3

Table of Contents



PART I

ITEM 1   IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Pursuant to the instructions to Item 1 of Form 20-F, this information has not been provided.

ITEM 2   OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

4            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



ITEM 3   KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 20102012 are derived from the consolidated financial statements of Agnico-Eagle audited by Ernst & Young LLP. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company's operating and financial review and prospects set out in Item 5 of this Form 20-F, the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto set out in Item 18 of this Form 20-F and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.

 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 
 
 
 (in thousands of U.S. dollars, US GAAP basis,
other than share and per share information)
  (in thousands of U.S. dollars, US GAAP basis,
other than share and per share information)
 
Income Statement Data                      

Revenues from mining operations 1,422,521 613,762 368,938 432,205 464,632  1,917,714 1,821,799 1,422,521 613,762 368,938 

Production costs 677,472 306,318 186,862 166,104 143,753  897,712 876,078 677,472 306,318 186,862 

Exploration and corporate development 54,958 36,279 34,704 25,507 30,414  109,500 75,721 54,958 36,279 34,704 

Equity loss in junior exploration company     663 

Amortization 192,486 72,461 36,133 27,757 25,255  271,861 261,781 192,486 72,461 36,133 

General and administrative 94,327 63,687 47,187 38,167 25,884  119,085 107,926 94,327 63,687 47,187 

Write-down of available-for-sale securities   74,812    12,732 8,569   74,812 

Loss (Gain) on derivative financial instruments (7,612)  5,829 15,148  820 (3,683)(7,612)  

Provincial capital tax (6,075)5,014 5,332 3,202 3,758  4,001 9,223 (6,075)5,014 5,332 

Interest 49,493 8,448 2,952 3,294 2,902  57,887 55,039 49,493 8,448 2,952 

Interest and sundry income (10,254)(16,172)(11,721)(25,142)(21,797)  (1,667)5,188 (10,254)(16,172)(11,721) 

Loss on Goldex mine  302,893    


Impairment loss on Meadowbank mine  907,681    


Gain on acquisition of Comaplex, net of transaction costs (57,526)       (57,526)  

Gain on sale of available-for-sale-securities (19,487)(10,142)(25,626)(4,088)(24,118)  (9,733)(4,907)(19,487)(10,142)(25,626) 

Foreign exchange (gain) loss 19,536 39,831 (77,688)32,297 2,127  16,320 (1,082)19,536 39,831 (77,688) 

Income before income and mining taxes 435,203 108,038 95,991 159,278 260,643  435,141 (778,628)435,203 108,038 95,991 

Income and mining taxes (recoveries) 103,087 21,500 22,824 19,933 99,306  124,225 (209,673)103,087 21,500 22,824 

Net income 332,116 86,538 73,167 139,345 161,337  310,916 (568,955)332,116 86,538 73,167 



Attributed to non-controlling interest  (60)   


Attributed to common shareholders 310,916 (568,895)   


Net income per share – basic 2.05 0.55 0.51 1.05 1.40  1.82 (3.36)2.05 0.55 0.51 

Net income per share – diluted 2.00 0.55 0.50 1.04 1.35  1.81 (3.36)2.00 0.55 0.50 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding – basic 162,342,686 155,942,151 144,740,658 132,768,049 115,461,046  171,250,179 170,275,475 162,342,686 155,942,151 144,740,658 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding – diluted 165,842,259 158,620,888 145,888,728 133,957,869 119,110,295  171,485,615 170,275,475 165,842,259 158,620,888 145,888,728 

Dividends declared per common share 0.64 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.12  1.02  0.64 0.18 0.18 

4            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            5

Table of Contents


Balance Sheet Data (at end of period)                      

Mining properties (net) 4,564,563 3,581,798 2,997,500 2,123,397 859,859  4,067,456 3,895,355 4,564,563 3,581,798 2,997,500 

Total assets 5,500,351 4,247,357 3,378,824 2,735,498 1,521,488  5,225,842 5,034,262 5,500,351 4,247,357 3,378,824 

Long-term debt 650,000 715,000 200,000    830,000 920,095 650,000 715,000 200,000 

Reclamation provision and other liabilities 145,536 96,255 71,770 57,941 27,457  127,735 145,988 145,536 96,255 71,770 

Net assets 3,665,450 2,751,761 2,517,756 2,058,934 1,252,405  3,410,212 3,215,163 3,665,450 2,751,761 2,517,756 

Common shares 3,078,217 2,378,759 2,299,747 1,931,667 1,230,654  3,241,922 3,181,381 3,078,217 2,378,759 2,299,747 

Shareholders' equity 3,665,450 2,751,761 2,517,756 2,058,934 1,252,405  3,410,212 3,215,163 3,665,450 2,751,761 2,517,756 

Total common shares outstanding 168,720,355 156,625,174 154,808,918 142,403,379 121,025,635  172,296,610 170,859,604 168,720,355 156,625,174 154,808,918 


Currency Exchange Rates

All dollar amounts in this Form 20-F are in U.S. dollars, except where otherwise indicated. The following tables set out, in Canadian dollars, the exchange rates for the U.S. dollar, based on the noon buying rate as reported by the Bank of Canada (the "Noon Buying Rate"). On March 18, 2011,11, 2013, the Noon Buying Rate was US$1.00 equals C$0.98.1.0268.

 Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 
 
 
High 1.0778 1.3000 1.2969 1.1853 1.1726 1.0418 1.0604 1.0778 1.3000 1.2969 

Low 0.9946 1.0292 0.9719 0.9170 1.0990 0.9710 0.9449 0.9946 1.0292 0.9719 

End of Period 0.9946 1.0466 1.2246 0.9881 1.1653 0.9949 1.0170 0.9946 1.0466 1.2246 

Average 1.0299 1.1420 1.0660 1.0748 1.1341 0.9996 0.9891 1.0299 1.1420 1.0660 

 
 2011 2010 2013 2012
 
 
 
 
 March
(to March 18

)
February January December November October September March
(to March 11

)
February January December November October September 
 
 
High 0.9918 0.9955 1.0022 1.0178 1.0264 1.0320 1.0520 1.0314 1.0285 1.0078 0.9952 1.0028 1.0004 0.9902 

Low 0.9686 0.9739 0.9862 0.9946 1.0013 1.0030 1.0222 1.0268 0.9960 0.9839 0.9841 0.9927 0.9763 0.9710 

End of Period 0.9844 0.9739 1.0022 0.9946 1.0264 1.0188 1.0298 1.0268 1.0285 0.9992 0.9949 0.9932 0.9996 0.9837 

Average 0.9770 0.9876 0.9939 1.0077 1.0128 1.0178 1.0331 1.0290 1.0098 0.9921 0.9896 0.9970 0.9872 0.9783 

On December 31, 20102012 and March 18, 2011,11, 2013, US$1.00 equalled €0.75€0.7579 and €0.71,€0.7696, respectively, as reported by the European Central Bank.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT6                        5AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Risk Factors

The Company's financial performance and results may fluctuate widely due to volatile and unpredictable commodity prices.

The Company's earnings are directly related to commodity prices, as revenues are derived from the sale of precious metals (gold and silver), zinc, copper and copper.lead. Gold prices, which have the greatest impact on the Company's financial performance, fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control, including central bank purchases and sales, producer hedging and de-hedging activities, expectations of inflation, investment demand, the relative exchange rate of the U.S. dollar with other major currencies, interest rates, global and regional demand, political and economic conditions, production costs in major gold-producing regions, speculative positions taken by investors or traders in gold and changes in supply, including worldwide production levels. The aggregate effect of these factors is impossible to predict with accuracy. In addition, the price of gold has on occasion been subject to very rapid short-term changes because of speculative activities. Fluctuations in gold prices may materially adversely affect the Company's financial performance or results of operations. If the market price of gold falls below the Company's total cash costs per ounce of production at one or more of its projects at that time and remains so for any sustained period, the Company may experience losses and/or may curtail or suspend some or all of its exploration, development and mining activities at such projects or at other projects. Also,In addition, such fluctuations may require changes to the mine plan. The Company's decisions to proceed with the operations at its currentcurrently operating mines were based on a market price of gold between $400 and $450$690 per ounce. If the market price of gold falls below this level,these levels, the mines may be rendered uneconomic and production may be suspended. In addition, theThe Company's evaluation of the acquisition of the Meliadine property acquisitionproject was based on an assumption of a market price of gold of $950 per ounce, the evaluation of the acquisition of the La India mine project was based on an assumption of a market price of gold of $1,150 per ounce and the decision to proceed with the development and mining of the M and E Zones at Goldex was based on a market price of gold of $1,342 per ounce. If the market price of gold falls below this level,these respective levels, future activity at the Meliadine propertyproject, the La India mine project or the Goldex mine project may be rendered uneconomic and activities may be suspended. Also,The Company's current mine plans are all based on a gold price of $1,342 per ounce and reserve and resource estimates are based on a gold price of $1,490 per ounce or $1,345 per ounce (see "Item 4 – Information on the Company – Property, Plant and Equipment – Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources – Information on Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources of the Company"); if the price of gold falls below these levels the mine plans may have to be changed, which may result in reduced production, higher costs than anticipated or both and estimates of reserves and resources may have to be reduced. Further, the prices received from the sale of the Company's byproduct metals produced at its LaRonde Minemine (zinc, silver, leadcopper and copper)lead) and its Pinos Altos Minemine (silver) affect the Company's ability to meet its targets for total cash costs per ounce or all-in sustaining costs of gold produced. ByproductThese byproduct metal prices fluctuate widely and are also affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control. The Company's policy and practice is not to sell forward its future gold production; however, under the Company's price risk management policy, approved by the Company's board of directors (the "Board" or the "Board of Directors"), the Company may review this practice on a project by project basis. See "Item 11 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Derivatives" for more details on the Company's use of derivative instruments. The Company occasionally uses derivative instruments to mitigate the effects of fluctuating byproduct metal prices; however, these measures may not be successful.

The volatility of gold prices is illustrated in the following table which sets out, for the periods indicated, the high, low and average afternoon fixing prices for gold on the London Bullion Market (the "London P.M. Fix").

 
 
 2011
(to March 18

)
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2013
(to March 11)
 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 
 
 
High price ($ per ounce) 1,438 1,421 1,212 1,011 841 725 1,694 1,792 1,895 1,421 1,212 1,011 

Low price ($ per ounce) 1,319 1,058 810 712 608 525 1,574 1,540 1,319 1,058 810 712 

Average price ($ per ounce) 1,378 1,125 972 872 695 604 1,640 1,669 1,572 1,125 972 872 

On March 18, 2011,11, 2013, the London P.M. Fix was $1,420$1,579 per ounce of gold.

The assumptions that underlie the estimate of future operating results and the strategies used to mitigate the effects of risks of metal prices are set out herein and in "Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Outlook – Gold Production Growth" of this Form 20-F.

6            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            7

Table of Contents


Based on 20112013 production estimates, the approximate sensitivities of the Company's after-tax income to a 10% change in certain metal prices from 20102012 market average prices are as follows:

  
   Income
per share
  
Gold $0.55

Silver $0.06

Zinc $0.06

Copper $0.01


Income
per share

Gold$0.69

Silver$0.01

Zinc$0.02

Copper$0.06

Sensitivities of the Company's after-tax income to changes in metal prices will increase with increased production.

The Company is largely dependent upon its mining and milling operations in the Abitibi region of Quebec and at its Meadowbank Minemine in Nunavut and Pinos Altos mine in Mexico, and any adverse condition affecting those operations may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company's operations at the LaRonde, Goldex and Lapa MinesMeadowbank mine in the Abitibi regionNunavut accounted for approximately 40%35% of the Company's gold production in 20102012 and are expected to account for the same percentage in 2011. The Meadowbank Mine accounted for approximately 27%36% of the Company's gold production in 2010, although it did not achieve commercial2013. The Pinos Altos mine in northern Mexico accounted for approximately 23% of the Company's gold production until March 2010,in 2012 and is expected to account for approximately 31%19% of the Company's gold production in 2011. The mines2013. Also, in 2012 the Abitibi regionMeadowbank mine and in Nunavut will continue to accountthe Pinos Altos mine accounted for a significant portionapproximately 26% and 29%, respectively, of the Company's operating margin. In 2011, gold production.production at the Meadowbank mine was approximately 90,000 ounces below the Company's expectation as a result of issues that included a fire that destroyed the minesite's kitchen facilities and above anticipated dilution. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company performed a full review of the Meadowbank mine's operation and updated the related life of mine plan. The review considered the exploration potential of the area, the current mineral reserves and resources, the projected operating costs in light of persistently high operating costs experienced since the commencement of commercial operations, metallurgical performance and gold price. The updated life of mine plan contemplated a shorter mine life and reduced reserves and resources and required the Company to incur a pre-tax asset impairment charge of $907.7 million. Any adverse condition affecting mining or milling conditions inat the Abitibi regionMeadowbank or in NunavutPinos Altos mines could be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance and results of operations.operations (see "– The Company's recently opened mines, mine construction projects and expansion projects are subject to risks associated with new mine development, which may result in delays in the start-up of mining operations, delays in existing operations and unanticipated costs" and "– If the Company experiences mining accidents or other adverse conditions, the Company's mining operations may yield less gold than indicated by its estimated gold production" below). Gold production at the Meadowbank mine is also subject to risks relating to operating in a remote location (see "– The Company may experience difficulties operating its Meadowbank mine and developing the Meliadine project as a result of their remote location" below). The Company also anticipates using revenue generated by its operations at thesethe Meadowbank and Pinos Altos mines to finance a substantial portion of theits capital expenditures required for expansionin 2013, including projects at the Kittila and Pinos Altos mines, the Goldex and Meadowbank Mines and for exploration and development at itsLa India mine projects includingand the Meliadine project. In addition, one of the Company's major development programs is the extension of the LaRonde Mine below Level 245, referred to as the LaRonde Mine extension. This program involves the construction of infrastructure at depth and extraction of ore from new zones, and may present new challenges for the Company. Gold production at the LaRonde Mine above Level 245 has started to decline.

The Kittila Mine and the Pinos Altos Mine commenced commercial production in 2009 and commercial production at the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos is expected to be achieved in the first quarter of 2011. However, unlessUnless the Company otherwise acquires or develops other significant gold-producing assets, in other regions, the Company will continue to be dependent on its operations inat the Abitibi regionMeadowbank and in NunavutPinos Altos mines for the majoritya substantial portion of its gold production.production and cash flow provided by operating activities. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company's current exploration and development programs at the LaRonde, GoldexMeadowbank or Meadowbank MinesPinos Altos will result in any new economically viable mining operations or yield new mineral reserves to replace and expand current mineral reserves.

The Company may experience difficulties operating its Meadowbank Minemine and developing the Meliadine project as a result of their remote location.

The Company's Meadowbank Minemine is located in the Kivalliq District of Nunavut in northern Canada, approximately 70 kilometres north of Baker Lake. The closest major city is Winnipeg, Manitoba, approximately 1,500 kilometres to the south. Though theThe Company constructed a 110-kilometre all-weather road from Baker Lake, which provides summer shipping access via Hudson Bay to the Meadowbank Mine,mine. However, the Company's operations will beare constrained by the remoteness of the mine, particularly as the port of Baker Lake is only accessible approximately 2.5 months per year. Most of the materials that the Company requires for the operation of the Meadowbank Minemine must be transported through the port of

8            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Baker Lake during this shipping season, which may be further truncated due to weather conditions. If the Company is not ableunable to acquire and transport necessary supplies during this time, this may result in a slowdown or stoppage of operations at the Meadowbank Mine.mine. Furthermore, if major equipment fails, items necessary to replace or repair such equipment may have to be shipped through Baker Lake during this window. Failure to have available the necessary materials required for operations or to repair or replace malfunctioning equipment at the Meadowbank Minemine may require the slowdown or stoppage of operations.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            7

Table For example, the March 2011 fire at the kitchen facilities of Contentsthe Meadowbank mine required operations to be reduced at the mine, which resulted in lower gold production at the mine.


The Company's Meliadine project, 290 kilometres southeast of the Meadowbank Mine,mine, is also located in the Kivalliq District of Nunavut, approximately 25 kilometres northwest of the hamlet of Rankin Inlet on the west coast of Hudson Bay. Access to the property is by helicopter from Rankin Inlet year-round and by tracked vehicles overland on a winter road from approximately late December to mid-May. An all-weather access road between the project and Rankin Inlet is at the permitting stage. The Company's operations at the Meliadine project may be constrained by its remoteness and, if the all-weather access road from Rankin Inlet is not completed as scheduled in mid-2013, lack of access if the winter road season is shortened by permit delays or unusually warm weather, or if permitting and construction of the all-weather road is delayed.weather. Most of the materials that the Company requires to operate the advanced exploration program, and may require if it determines to build a mine in the future, must be transported through the port of Rankin Inlet during its six-week shipping season. If the Company cannot identify and procure suitable equipment and materials within a timeframe that permits transporting them to the project within this shipping season, thisit could result in delays and/or cost increases in the exploration program and, if the Company determines to build a mine, any construction or development on the property.

The remoteness of the Meadowbank Minemine and Meliadine project also necessitates the use of fly-in/fly-out camps for the accommodation of site employees and contractors, which may have an impact on the Company's ability to attract and retain qualified mining, exploration and construction personnel. If the Company is unable to attract and retain sufficient personnel or sub-contractors on a timely basis, the Company's operations at the Meadowbank Minemine and future development plans at the Meliadine project may be adversely affected.

The Company's newlyrecently opened mines, mine construction projects and expansion projects are subject to risks associated with new mine development, which may result in delays in the start-up of mining operations, delays in existing operations and unanticipated costs.

The Company's production forecasts assume that production will commence at the Creston Mascota deposit and LaRonde Mine extension in the second quarter and fourth quarter of 2011, respectively, and that the Meadowbank Mine, Kittila Mine and the Pinos Altos Mine will achieveare based on full production rates during 2011. Thebeing achieved at all of its mines, and the Company's ability to achieve and maintain full production rates at these mines is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Production from these mines in 20112013 may be lower than anticipated if there are delays in achieving the full production rate, and it is possible that the anticipated full production rate cannot be achieved. Delays in commissioning the Meadowbank Mine and issues with the mill at the Pinos Altos Mine and the Kittila autoclave in 2010 resulted in anticipated 2010 gold production being reduced by an aggregate of approximately 69,593 ounces.

The LaRonde Minemine extension, will bewhich commenced operation in late 2011, is one of the deepest operations in the Western Hemisphere with an expected maximum depth of 3,110 metres. The operations of the LaRonde Minemine extension will rely on new infrastructure for hauling ore and materials to the surface, including a winze (or internal shaft) and a series of ramps linking mining deposits to the Penna Shaft that services current operations at the LaRonde Mine.mine. The depth of the operations could poseposes significant challenges to the Company, such as geomechanical risks and ventilation and air conditioning requirements, which may result in difficulties and delays in achieving gold production objectives. In 2012, challenges associated with excess heat and congestion at the lower parts of the mine delayed the ramp up of production. While production in 2012 was not reduced, the Company has reduced its annual production forecast for 2013 and 2014 due to these factors.

The further development of the LaRonde Mine extensionKittila and the Kittila, Pinos Altos mines, as well as the development of the M Zone and Meadowbank Mines requireE Zone at the Goldex mine project, requires the construction and operation of significant new underground mining operations.operations and the development of the La India mine project requires the construction and operation of open pit and heap leach facilities. The construction and operation of underground mining facilities isand open pit and heap leach facilities are subject to a number of risks, including unforeseen geological formations, implementation of new mining processes, delays in obtaining required construction, environmental or operating permits and engineering and mine design adjustments. Moreover, the construction activities at the LaRonde Mine extension are taking place concurrently with normal mining operations at LaRonde, which may result in conflicts with, or possible delays to, existing mining operations.

8            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


If the Company experiences mining accidents or other adverse conditions, the Company's mining operations may yield less gold than indicated by its estimated gold production.

The Company's gold production may fall below estimated levels as a result of mining accidents such as cave-ins, rock falls, rock bursts, pit wall failures, fires or flooding or as a result of other operational problems such as a failure of a production hoist, autoclave, filter press or semi-autogenous grinding ("SAG") mill. In addition, production may be reduced if, during the course of mining or processing, unfavourable weather conditions, ground conditions or seismic activity are encountered, ore grades are lower than expected, the physical or metallurgical characteristics of the ore are less amenable

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            9

Table of Contents



than expected to mining or treatment, dilution increases, electrical power is interrupted or heap leach processing results in containment discharge. In sixWhile the Company met production forecasts in 2012, it failed to do so in seven of the last eightten years as a result of such adverse conditions, the Company has failed to meet production forecastsprimarily due to: a rock fall, production drilling challenges and lower than planned mill recoveries in 2003; higher than expected dilution in 2004; increased stress levels in a sill pillar requiring the temporary closure of production sublevels in 2005; and delays in the commissioning of the Goldex production hoist and the Kittila autoclave in 2008. In 2009, gold production was 492,972 ounces, down from the Company's initial estimate of 590,000 ounces, primarily as a result of delays in the commencement of production at the Kittila Minemine due to issues with the autoclave, at the Pinos Altos Minemine resulting from problems in commissioning the dry tailings filter presses and at the Lapa Minemine resulting from dilution issues. In 2010, gold production of 987,607 ounces was below the initial anticipated range of 1 million to 1.1 million ounces primarily as a result of lower throughput at the Meadowbank Minemine mill due to a bottleneck in the crushing circuit and because there were autoclave issues at the Kittila mine in the first half of the year. In 2011, gold production of 985,460 ounces was below the initial anticipated range of 1.13 to 1.23 million ounces primarily as a result of suspension of mining operations at the Goldex mine due to geotechnical concerns with the rock above the mining horizon, a fire in the Meadowbank mine kitchen complex which negatively impacted production and lower than expected grades at the Meadowbank and LaRonde mines. Although gold production of 1,043,811 ounces exceeded estimates in 2012, a movement of leached ore from the upper lifts of the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos phase one leach pad on September 30, 2012 suggested that the integrity of the phase one leach pad liner had been compromised and caused the suspension of active leaching in the fourth quarter. Occurrences of this nature and other accidents, adverse conditions or operational problems in future years may result in the Company's failure to achieve current or future production estimates.

The Company's total cash costs per ounce of gold production depend, in part, on external factors that are subject to fluctuation and, if such costs increase, some or all of the Company's activities may become unprofitable.

The Company's total cash costs per ounce of gold are dependent on a number of factors, including the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar, Euro or Mexican peso, smelting and refining charges, production royalties, the price of gold and byproduct metals and the cost of inputs used in mining operations. At the LaRonde Mine,mine, the Company's total cash costs per ounce of production are primarily affected by the prices and production levels of byproduct zinc, silver and copper, the revenue from which is offset against the cost of gold production. Total cash costs per ounce from the Company's operations at the Pinos Altos Minemine are affected by the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso and the price and production level of byproduct silver, the revenue from which is offset against the cost of gold production. Total cash costs per ounce from the Company's operations at its mines in Canada and the Kittila Minemine are affected by changes in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar and the Euro, respectively. Total cash costs per ounce at all of the Company's mines are also affected by the costs of inputs used in mining operations, including labour (including contractors), steel, chemical reagents and energy. All of these factors are beyond the Company's control. If the Company's total cash costs per ounce of gold rise above the market price of gold and remain so for any sustained period, the Company may experience losses and may curtail or suspend some or all of its exploration, development and mining activities.

Total cash costs per ounce is not a recognized measure under US GAAP, and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. Management uses this generally accepted industry measure in evaluating operating performance and believes it to be a realistic indicator of such performance and useful in allowing year over year comparisons. The data also reflects the Company's ability to generate cash flow and operating income at various gold prices. This additional information should be considered together with other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of operating costs or cash flow measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP. See "Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Results of Operations – Production Costs" for reconciliation of total cash costs per ounce and minesite costs per tonne to their closest US GAAP measure and "Note to Investors Concerning Certain Measures of Performance" for a discussion of these non-US GAAP measures.

The Company may experience operational difficulties at its minesoperations in Finland and Mexico.

The Company's operations include a mine in Finland and a mine and a mine development project in northern Mexico. These operations are subject to various levels of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties that are different from those encountered at the Company's Canadian properties. These risks and uncertainties vary from country to country and may include: extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labour unrest; risks of war or civil unrest; expropriation and nationalization; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licences, permits and contracts; illegal mining; corruption; restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; hostage taking; and changing political conditions and

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            9

Table of Contents



currency controls. In addition, the Company must comply with multiple and potentially conflicting regulations in Canada, the United States, Europe and Mexico, including export requirements, taxes, tariffs, import duties and other trade barriers, as well as health, safety and environmental requirements.

10            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude in Finland or Mexico may adversely affect the Company's operations or profitability. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to matters including restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency controls or restrictions, currency remittance, income and other taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral rights applications and tenure could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners with carried or other interests.

In addition, the Company has limited operating experience outside of Canada. Finland and Mexico have significantly different laws and regulations than Canada and there exist cultural and language differences between these countries and Canada. Also, the Company faces challenges inherent in efficiently managing an increased number of employees over large geographical distances, including the challenges of staffing and managing operations in several international locations and implementing appropriate systems, policies, benefits and compliance programs. These challenges may divert management's attention to the detriment of the Company's operations in Canada. There can be no assurance that difficulties associated with the Company's foreign operations can be successfully managed.

Mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are only estimates and such estimates may not accurately reflect future mineral recovery.

The figures for mineral reserves and mineral resources published by the Company are estimates and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved or that the indicated level of recovery of gold will be realized. Mineral reserve and resource estimates are based on gold recoveries in small scale laboratory tests and may not be indicative of the mineralization in the entire orebody and the Company may not be able to achieve similar results in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production. The ore grade actually recovered by the Company may differ from the estimated grades of the mineral reserves and mineral resources. The estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources have been determined based on assumed metal prices, foreign exchange rates and operating costs. For example, the Company has estimated proven and probable mineral reserves on all of its LaRonde, Kittila, Pinos Altos, La India and Tarachi properties based on, among other things, a $1,024$1,345 per ounce gold price. Estimated proven and probable reserves on the Company's other properties (including the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos) are based on a $1,490 per ounce gold price. Monthly average gold prices have been above $1,024$1,345 per ounce since October 2009;November 2010; however, prior to that time, monthly average gold prices have beenwere below $1,024$1,345 per ounce. Prolonged declines in the market price of gold (or applicable byproduct metal prices) may render mineral reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomical to recover and could materially reduce the Company's mineral reserves. Should such reductions occur, the Company may be required to take a material write-down of its investment in mining properties, reduce the carrying value of one or more of its assets or delay or discontinue production or the development of new projects, resulting in increased net losses and reduced cash flow. Market price fluctuations of gold (or applicable byproduct metal prices), as well as increased production costs or reduced recovery rates, may render mineral reserves containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomical to recover and may ultimately result in a restatement of mineral resources. Short-term factors relating to the mineral reserve, such as the need for orderly development of orebodies or the processing of new or different grades, may impair the profitability of a mine in any particular accounting period.

Mineral resource estimates for properties that have not commenced production or at deposits that have not yet been exploited are based, in most instances, on very limited and widely spaced drill hole information, which is not necessarily indicative of conditions between and around the drill holes. Accordingly, such mineral resource estimates may require revision as more drilling information becomes available or as actual production experience is gained.

The Company may experience problems in executing acquisitions or managing and integrating any completed acquisitions with its existing operations.

The Company regularly evaluates opportunities to acquire sharessecurities or assets of other mining businesses. Such acquisitions may be significant in size, may change the scale of the Company's business and may expose the Company to new geographic, political, operating, financial or geological risks. The Company's success in its acquisition activities depends on its ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, acquire them on acceptable terms and integrate their operations successfully with those of the Company. Any acquisition would be accompanied by risks, such as the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired businesses; the potential disruption of the Company's ongoing business; the inability of management to maximize the financial and strategic position of the Company through the successful integration of acquired assets and businesses; the maintenance of uniform standards, controls,

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            11

Table of Contents



procedures and policies; the impairment of relationships with employees, customers and contractors as a result of any integration of new management personnel; and the potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired assets and businesses. In

10            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



addition, the Company may need additional capital to finance an acquisition. Debt financing related to any acquisition may expose the Company to the risks related to increased leverage, while equity financing may cause existing shareholders to suffer dilution. The Company is permitted under the terms of its unsecured revolving bank credit facility and its $600 million of guaranteed senior unsecured notes referred to under the heading "Item 410 Additional Information on the Company – History and Development of the Company"Material Contracts" to incur additional unsecured indebtedness, provided that it maintains certain financial ratios and meets financial condition covenants and, in the case of the bank credit facility, that it complies with certain covenants. These covenants includinginclude that no event of default under the bank credit facility has occurred and is continuing, or would occur as a result of the incurrence or assumption of such indebtedness, the terms of such indebtedness are no more onerous to the Company than those under the bank credit facility and such indebtedness does not require principal payments until at least 12 months following the then existing maturity date of the bank credit facility. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in overcoming these or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar may adversely affect the Company's results of operations.

The Company's operating results and cash flow are significantly affected by changes in the U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate. All of the Company's revenues are earned in U.S. dollars but the majority of its operating costs at the LaRonde, Mine,Lapa and Meadowbank mines, as well as the Goldex Mine, the Lapa Minemine project and the Meadowbank Mine, as well as the Meliadine project, are incurred in Canadian dollars. The U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate has fluctuated significantly over the last several years. From January 1, 20062008 to January 1, 2011,2013, the Noon Buying Rate fluctuated from a high of C$1.3000 per $1.00 to a low of C$0.91700.9449 per $1.00. Historical fluctuations in the U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate are not necessarily indicative of future exchange rate fluctuations. Based on the Company's anticipated 20112013 after-tax operating results, a 10% change in the U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate from the 20102012 market average exchange rate would affect net income by approximately $0.34$0.37 per share. To attempt to mitigate its foreign exchange risk and minimize the impact of exchange rate movements on operating results and cash flow, the Company has periodically used foreign currency options and forward foreign exchange contracts to purchase Canadian dollars; however, there can be no assurance that these strategies will be effective. See "Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Outlook – Gold Production Growth" for a description of the assumptions underlying the sensitivity and the strategies used to mitigate the effects of risks. In addition, the majority of the Company's operating costs at the Kittila Minemine are incurred in Euros and a significant portion of operating costs at the Pinos Altos Minemine and exploration and development costs at the La India mine project are incurred in Mexican pesos. Each of these currencies has fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar over the past several years. There can be no assurance that the Company's foreign exchange derivatives strategies will be successful or that foreign exchange fluctuations will not materially adversely affect the Company's financial performance and results of operations.

If the Company fails to comply with restrictive covenants in its debt instruments, the Company's ability to borrow under its unsecured revolving bank credit facility could be limited and the Company may then default under other debt agreements, which could harm the Company's business.

The Company's unsecured revolving $1.2 billion bank credit facility limits, among other things, the Company's ability to permit the creation of certain liens, make investments other than investments in businesses related to mining or a business ancillary or carry on business unrelatedcomplementary to mining, dispose of the Company's material assets or, in certain circumstances, pay dividends. In addition, the Company's $600 million guaranteed senior unsecured notes limit, among other things, the Company's ability to permit the creation of certain liens, carry on business unrelated to mining or dispose of the Company's material assets. The bank credit facility and the guaranteed senior unsecured notes also require the Company to maintain specified financial ratios and meet financial condition covenants. Events beyond the Company's control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, may affect the Company's ability to satisfy these covenants, which could result in a default under one of the bank credit facility or the notes.guaranteed senior unsecured notes and, by extension, the Company's C$150 million uncommitted letter of credit facility. At March 18, 201111, 2013, there was approximately $32$1.1 million drawn under the bank credit facility all of which was issued as(reflecting outstanding letters of credit) and approximately C$135 million drawn under the letter of credit and the Company anticipates that it will continue to draw on the bank credit facility to fund part of the capital expenditures required in connection with its current development projects.facility. If an event of default under the unsecured revolving bank credit facility or the notes occurs, the Company would be unable to draw down further on the bank credit facility and the lenders could elect to declare all principal amounts outstanding thereunder at such time, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and it could cause an event of default under the notes.Company's guaranteed senior unsecured notes and the uncommitted letter of credit facility. An event of default under either of the unsecured revolving bank credit facility, the guaranteed senior unsecured notes or the notesuncommitted letter of

12            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



credit facility may also give rise to an event of default under other existing and future debt agreements and, in such event, the Company may not have sufficient funds to repay amounts owing under such agreements.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            11

Table of Contents


The exploration of mineral properties is highly speculative, involves substantial expenditures and is frequently unsuccessful.

The Company's profitability is significantly affected by the costs and results of its exploration and development programs. As mines have limited lives based on proven and probable mineral reserves, the Company actively seeks to replace and expand its mineral reserves, primarily through exploration and development as well as through strategic acquisitions. Exploration for minerals is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently unsuccessful. Among the many uncertainties inherent in any gold exploration and development program are the location of economic orebodies, the development of appropriate metallurgical processes, the receipt of necessary governmental permits and the construction of mining and processing facilities. Substantial expenditures are required to pursue such exploration and development activities. Assuming discovery of an economic orebody, depending on the type of mining operation involved, several years may elapse from the initial phases of drilling until commercial operations are commenced and during such time the economic feasibility of production may change. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company's current or future exploration and development programs will result in any new economically viable mining operations or yield new mineral reserves to replace and expand current mineral reserves.

The mining industry is highly competitive, and the Company may not be successful in competing for new mining properties.

There is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available for claim staking, leasing or other acquisitions in the areas where the Company contemplates conducting exploration activities. Many companies and individuals are engaged in the mining business, including large, established mining companies with substantial capabilities and long earnings records. The Company may be at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring mining properties, as it must compete with these companies and individuals, some of which have greater financial resources and larger technical staff than the Company. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully for new mining properties.

The success of the Company is dependent on good relations with its employees and on its ability to attract and retain employees and key personnel.

Production at the Company's mines and mine projects is dependent on the efforts of the Company's employees and contractors. The Company competes with mining and other companies on a global basis to attract and retain employees at all levels with appropriate technical skills and operating experience necessary to operate its mines. Relationships between the Company and its employees may be affected by changes in the scheme of labour relations that may be introduced by relevant government authorities in the jurisdictions that the Company operates. Changes in applicable legislation or in the relationship between the Company and its employees or contractors may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company is also dependent uponon a number of key management personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of such key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company's ability to manage its operating, development, exploration and financing activities will depend in large part on the efforts of these individuals.

The Company faces significant competition to attract and retain qualified personnel and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to attract and retain such personnel.

The Company may have difficulty financing its additional capital requirements for its planned mine construction, exploration and development.

The construction of mining facilities and commencement of miningsustaining capital required for operations at the LaRonde Mine extension(including potential expansions) and the development of the La India and Goldex mine projects and the Meliadine project the expansion of capacity at the Kittila Mine and the exploration and development of the Company's properties, including continuing exploration and development projects in Quebec, Nunavut, Finland, Mexico and Nevada, will require substantial capital expenditures. The Company estimates that capital expenditures will be approximately $313$596 million in 2011 and $175 million in 2012.2013. As at March 18, 2011,11, 2013, the Company had approximately $1,168 million$1.199 billion available to be borrowed under theits bank credit facility. Based on current funding available to the Company and expected cash from operations, the Company believes it has sufficient funds available to fund its projected capital expenditures for all of its current properties. However, if cash from operations is lower than expected or capital costs at these mines or projects exceed current estimates, or if the Company incurs major unanticipated expenses related to exploration, development or maintenance of its properties, or if

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            13

Table of Contents



advances from the bank credit facility are unavailable, the Company may be required to seek additional financing to maintain its capital expenditures at planned levels. In addition, the Company will have additional capital requirements to the extent that it decides to expand its present operations and

12            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



exploration activities;activities, construct additional new mining and processing operations at any of its properties;properties or take advantage of opportunities for acquisitions, joint ventures or other business opportunities that may arise. Additional financing may not be available when needed or, if available, the terms of such financing may not be favourable to the Company and, if raised by offering equity securities, or securities convertible into equity securities, any additional financing may involve substantial dilution to existing shareholders. Failure to obtain any financing necessary for the Company's capital expenditure plans may result in a delay or indefinite postponement of exploration, development or production on any or all of the Company's properties, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

The continuing weakness in the global credit and capital markets could have a material adverse impact on the Company's liquidity and capital resources.

The credit and capital markets experienced significant deterioration in 2008, including, without limitation, the failure of significant and established financial institutions in the United States and abroad, and continueshave continued to show weakness and volatility. These unprecedentedsevere disruptions in the credit and capital markets have negatively impactedhad a negative impact on the availability and terms of credit and capital. If uncertainties in these markets continue, or these markets deteriorate further, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company's liquidity, ability to raise capital and costs of capital. Failure to raise capital when needed or on reasonable terms may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Due to the nature of the Company's mining operations, the Company may face liability, delays and increased production costs from environmental and industrial accidents and pollution, and the Company's insurance coverage may prove inadequate to satisfy future claims against the Company.

The business of gold mining is generally subject to risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected rock formations, changes in the regulatory environment, cave-ins, rock bursts, rock falls, pit wall failures and flooding and gold bullion losses. Such occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. As well, such risks may arise with respect to the closure of mines and the management of closed mine sites and mine waste (whether the Company operated the mine site or acquired it after operations were conducted by others). The Company carries insurance to protect itself against certain risks of mining and processing in amounts that it considers to be adequate but which may not provide adequate coverage in certain unforeseen circumstances. The Company may also become subject to liability for pollution, cave-ins or other hazards against which it cannot insure or against which it has elected not to insure because of high premium costs or other reasons, or the Company may become subject to liabilities which exceed policy limits. In these circumstances, the Company may incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on its financial performance and results of operations.

The Company's operations are subject to numerous laws and extensive government regulations which may require significant expenditures or cause a reduction in levels of production, delay or the prevention of the development of new mining properties or otherwise cause the Company to incur costs that adversely affect the Company's results of operations.

The Company's mining and mineral processing operations, and exploration activities and properties are subject to the laws and regulations of federal, provincial, state and local governments in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. These laws and regulations are extensive and govern prospecting, exploration, development, production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational health and safety, waste disposal and tailings management, toxic substances, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Compliance with such laws and regulations increases the costs of planning, designing, drilling, developing, constructing, operating, managing, closing, reclaiming and rehabilitating mines and other facilities.facilities and features. New laws or regulations, amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations and activities ofon mining companiesproperties or more stringent implementation or interpretation thereof could have a material adverse impact on the Company, cause a reduction in levels of production and delay or prevent the development of new mining properties.

Increased regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change issues may adversely affect the Company's operations.

The Company operates in a number of jurisdictions in which regulatory requirements have been introduced or are being contemplated to monitor, report and/or reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Under the Copenhagen Accord, Canada has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17%, relative to 2005 levels, by 2020, but this commitment is subject to future alignment with reduction targets and regulatory requirements in the United States. Canada is also considering new regulatory requirements to address greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, the Province of Quebec is a

2010 ANNUAL REPORT14                        13AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



member of the Western Climate Initiative and has passed legislation enabling the establishment of a greenhouse gas emissions registry, greenhouse gas reduction targets and a cap-and-trade system to achieve Quebec's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20%, relative to 1990 levels, by 2020. The Company's operations in Quebec use primarily hydroelectric power and as a consequence are not large producers of greenhouse gases. The Meadowbank Mine produces 127,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year from its own production of electricity from diesel-power generation and it is expected that any mining operation at the Meliadine project would also produce some of its power from diesel-power generation. The Pinos Altos Mine purchases electricity that is largely fossil-fuel generated. As a result, it is the Company's second highest greenhouse gas producer (93,152 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year). None of the Company's other operations emit more than 30,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year. As a result, notwithstanding the ongoing uncertainty around the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, new regulatory requirements in respect of greenhouse gasses and the additional costs required to comply are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's operations and financial condition.

Title to the Company's properties may be uncertain and subject to risks.

The acquisition of title to mineral properties is a very detailed and time-consuming process. Title to, and the area of, mineral concessions may be disputed. Although the Company believes it has taken reasonable measures to ensure proper title to its properties, there is no guarantee that title to any of its properties will not be challenged or impaired. Third parties may have valid claims on underlying portions of the Company's interests, including prior unregistered liens, agreements, transfers or claims, including native land claims by indigenous groups, and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, although the Company believes that it has sufficient surface rights for its operations, the Company may be unable to operate its properties as permitted or to enforce its rights in respect of its properties.

The Company's properties and mining operations may be subject to rights or claims of indigenous groups and the assertion of such rights or claims may impact the Company's ability to develop or operate its mining properties.

The Company operates in some areas currently or traditionally inhabited or used by indigenous peoples and subject to indigenous rights or claims. Accordingly, the Company is subject to the risk that one or more groups may oppose the continued operation, further development or new development of the Company's current or future properties. Such opposition may be directed through legal or administrative proceedings, or though protests or other campaigns against the Company's activities. Any such actions may have an adverse impact on the Company's operations. Although the Company attempts to develop and maintain good working relationships with all stakeholders, there can be no assurance that these relationships can be successfully managed.

Increased regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change issues may adversely affect the Company's operations.

The Company operates in jurisdictions where regulatory requirements have taken effect or are proposed to monitor, report and/or reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increased regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change issues may adversely affect the Company's operations. For example, Canada has targeted to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 17% from 2005 levels by 2020 through a sector-by-sector approach and intends to participate in the negotiation of a new international climate treaty, which would come into force in 2020. Canada's federal and provincial regulations also impose mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting requirements and Quebec recently adopted a cap-and-trade regulation, which took effect January 1, 2013. Similarly, Finland participates in the European Union's cap-and-trade system and Mexico has enacted climate change legislation with a greenhouse gas emission reduction target of 30% (from business-as-usual levels) by 2020.

The Company monitors and reports annually its direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions to the international Carbon Disclosure Project. In Quebec, the Company uses primarily hydroelectric power and is not a large producer of greenhouse gases. As a result, Quebec's new regulatory requirements are not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Meadowbank mine produces approximately 167,926 tonnes of greenhouse gases per year from the production of electricity from diesel power generation, which is approximately 51% of the Company's total direct greenhouse gas emissions. It is expected that the La India mine project and any mining operation at the Meliadine project will also use diesel power generation. The Pinos Altos mine purchases electricity that is largely fossil-fuel generated and is the Company's second highest greenhouse gas producer (at 102,341 tonnes of greenhouse gases per year), which is approximately 31% of the Company's total direct greenhouse gas emissions. None of the Company's other operations emit more than 30,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases per year. While these new regulatory requirements in respect of greenhouse gases and the additional costs required to comply are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations, such requirements may not be adopted as currently proposed, may be amended or may have unexpected effects on the Company and, as a result, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance and its results of operations.

The Company is subject to the risk of litigation, the causes and costs of which cannot be known.

The Company is subject to litigation arising in the normal course of business and may be involved in disputes with other parties in the future which may result in litigation. The causes of potential future litigation cannot be known and may arise from, among other things, business activities, environmental laws, volatility in stock price or failure to comply with disclosure obligations. Currently, the Company is the subject of certain class action lawsuits relating to the Company's disclosure prior to the suspension of mining operations at the Goldex mine in October 2011, as described in note 21 to the financial statements contained in Item 18 hereof. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. If the Company is unable to resolve these disputes favourably, either by judicial determination or settlement, it may have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial performance, cash flow and results of operations.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            15

Table of Contents


In the event of a dispute involving the foreign operations of the Company, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in Canada. The Company's ability to enforce its rights could have an adverse effect on its future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition.

The use of derivative instruments for the Company's byproduct metal production may prevent gains from being realized from subsequent byproduct metal price increases.

While the Company's general policy is not to sell forward its future gold production, the Company has used, and may in the future use, various byproduct metal derivative strategies, such as selling future contracts or purchasing put options. The Company continually evaluates the potential short-short and long-termlong term benefits of engaging in such derivative strategies based upon current market conditions. No assurance can be given, however, that the use of byproduct metal derivative strategies will benefit the Company in the future. There is a possibility that the Company could lock in forward deliveries at prices lower than the market price at the time of delivery. In addition, the Company could fail to produce enough byproduct metals to offset its forward delivery obligations, causingrequiring the Company to purchase the metal in the spot market at higher prices to fulfill its delivery obligations or, for cash settled contracts, make cash payments to counterparties in excess of byproduct revenue. If the Company is locked into a lower than market price forward contract or has to buy additional quantities at higher prices, its net income could be adversely affected. None of the current contracts establishing the byproduct metal derivatives positions qualifiedqualify for hedge accounting treatment under US GAAP and therefore any year-end mark-to-market adjustments are recognized in the "Gain on derivative financial instruments" line item of the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. See "Item 11 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Derivatives".

The trading price for the Company's securities is volatile.

The trading price of the Company's common shares and, consequently, the trading price of securities convertible into or exchangeable for the Company's common shares, have been and may continue to be subject to large fluctuations which may result in losses to investors. The trading price of the Company's common shares and securities convertible into or exchangeable for common shares may increase or decrease in response to a number of events and factors, including:

14            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Wide price swings are currently common in the markets on which the Company's securities trade. This volatility may adversely affect the prices of the Company's common shares and the securities convertible into or exchangeable for the Company's common shares regardless of the Company's operating performance.

The Company may not be able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX") requires an annual assessment by management of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Section 404 of SOX also requires an annual attestation report by the Company's independent auditors addressing the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Company has completed its Section 404 assessment and received the auditors' attestation as of December 31, 2010.2012.

If the Company fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, the Company may not be able to conclude that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of SOX. The Company's failure to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of SOX on an ongoing, timely basis could result in the loss of investor confidence in the

16            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



reliability of its financial statements, which in turn could harm the Company's business and negatively impact the trading price of its common shares and securities convertible or exchangeable for common shares. In addition, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm the Company's operating results or cause it to fail to meet its reporting obligations. Future acquisitions of companies may provide the Company with challenges in implementing the required processes, procedures and controls in its acquired operations. Acquired companies may not have disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting that are as thorough or effective as those required by securities laws currently applicable to the Company.

No evaluation can provide complete assurance that the Company's internal control over financial reporting will prevent misstatement due to error or fraud or will detect or uncover all failurescontrol issues or instances of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be reported.fraud, if any. The effectiveness of the Company's controls and procedures could also be limited by simple errors or faulty judgments. In addition, as the Company continues to expand, the challenges involved in maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting will increase and will require that the Company continue to improve its internal control over financial reporting. Although the Company intends to devote substantial time and incur substantial costs, as necessary, to ensure ongoing compliance, theThe Company cannot be certain that it will be successful in continuing to comply with Section 404 of SOX.

Potential unenforceability of civil liabilities and judgments.

The Company is incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. A majority of the Company's directors and officers as well as the experts named in this Form 20-F are residents of Canada. Also, almost all of the Company's assets and the assets of these persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for shareholders to initiate a lawsuit within the United States against these non-U.S. residents, or to enforce U.S. judgments against the Company or these persons. The Company's Canadian counsel has advised the Company that a monetary judgment of a U.S. court predicated solely upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws would likely be enforceable in Canada if the U.S. court in which the judgment was obtained had a basis for jurisdiction in the matter that was recognized by a Canadian court for such purposes. The Company cannot provide assurance that this will be the case. It is less certain that an action could be brought in Canada in the first instance on the basis of liability predicated solely upon suchthe civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws.

ITEM 4   INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

History and Development of the Company

The Company is an established Canadian-based international gold producer with mining operations in northwestern Quebec, northern Mexico, northern Finland and Nunavut and exploration activities in Canada, Europe, Latin America and the United States. The Company's operating history includes over three decades of continuous gold production primarily from underground operations. Since its formation on June 1, 1972, the Company has produced almost 6.5approximately 8.5 million ounces of gold. For definitions of certain technical terms used in the following discussion, see "– Property, Plant and Equipment – Glossary of Selected Mining Terms". in this Item 4.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            15

Table of Contents


The Company's strategy is to focus on the continued exploration, development and expansion of its properties, all of which are located in politically stable jurisdictions. The Company has spent approximately $2.2$3.1 billion on themine development of five new mines over the last fourfive years. Through this development program, the Company transformed itself from a regionally focused, single mine producer to a multi-mine international gold producer with sixfive operating, 100% owned mines.mines, two mine development projects and one advanced exploration project.

Since 1988, the LaRonde Mine,mine, in the Abitibi region of Quebec, has been the Company's flagship operation, producing approximately 4.24.5 million ounces of gold as well as valuable byproducts. The Lapa mine, one of the Company's highest grade metals mines, is 11 kilometres east of the LaRonde mine, and the Goldex Minemine project, where mine construction on the M and E zones was approved in July 2012, is 60 kilometres east of the LaRonde Mine, and the Lapa Mine, the Company's highest grade metals mine, is 11 kilometres east of the LaRonde Mine.mine. The synergies between these sites contribute to the Company's status as a low-cost producer.efforts to reduce costs. The Kittila Mine,mine in Finland, which achieved commercial production in May 2009, has a long reserve life and has significant production expansion potential. In February 2012, the Board approved expansion of mining operations at the Kittila mine to a capacity of 3,750 tonnes per day. The Pinos Altos Mine,mine, in Mexico, achieved commercial production in November 2009 and also has significant production expansion potential. The Company's sixthfifth mine, Meadowbank, in Nunavut, achieved commercial production in March 2010 and is expected to produce the most gold (361,600(approximately 360,000 ounces) in 2011.2013. In September 2012, the Company began the development and construction at the La India mine project in Mexico. The La India mine project and the Goldex mine project are both expected to achieve commercial production in the second quarter of 2014. In addition, the Company plans to pursue opportunities for growth in gold production and gold reserves through the prudent acquisition or development of exploration properties, development properties, producing properties and other mining businesses in the Americas and Europe.

The Company believes that its total cash costs per ounce remain below the industry average.2012 ANNUAL REPORT            17

Table of Contents


In 2010,2012, the Company produced 987,6091,043,811 ounces of gold at total cash costs per ounce of $451$640 net of revenues from byproduct metals. For 2011,2013, the Company expects to produce between 1.13 million970,000 and 1.23 million1,010,000 ounces of gold at a total cash costscost per ounce of gold produced of between $420$700 and $470$750 net of byproduct revenue. These expected higher total cash costs compared to 20102012 reflect the higherhigh proportion of production coming from the Meadowbank Mine,mine, which is expected to have higher total cash costs per ounce compared to the Company's average; higher costs associated with the transition to underground mining operations at the Pinos Altos Minemine and the Kittila Mine;mine; and increased production from the Company's mines and mine projects that do not contain byproduct metals, revenue from which reduces total cash costs per ounce. In addition, the higher total cash costs per ounce also reflect the strength of the Canadian dollar strengthening against the U.S. dollar and continued escalations in labour, shipping and transportation costs. See "Note to Investors Concerning Certain Measures of Performance" for a discussion of the use of the non-US GAAP measure total cash costs per ounce. The Company has traditionally sold all of its production at the spot price of gold due to its general policy not to sell forward its future gold production.

The Company expects its all-in sustaining costs for 2013 to be approximately $1,075 per ounce of gold. The Company calculates all-in sustaining costs as the aggregate of total cash costs (net of byproduct credits), sustaining capital expense, corporate, general and administrative expense (net of stock option expense) and exploration expenses divided by the number of ounces produced. All-in sustaining costs is a non-US GAAP measure and is used to show the full cost of gold production from current operations. The Company's methodology for calculating all-in sustaining costs may not be similar to the methodology used by other producers that disclose all-in sustaining costs. The Company may change the methodology it uses to calculate all-in sustaining costs in the future, including in response to the adoption of formal industry guidance regarding this measure by the World Gold Council.

The Company operates through four segments: Canada, Europe, Latin America and Exploration.

The Canadian Segment is comprised of the Company's operations in the Province of Quebec Region and the Nunavut Region.Territory. The Company's Quebec Region includesproperties include the LaRonde Mine,mine, the LaRonde Mine extension project,Lapa mine and the Goldex Mine and the Lapa Mine,mine project, each of which is held directly by the Company. In 2010,2012, the Quebec Regionproperties accounted for 47%approximately 25% of the Company's gold production, comprised of 16%approximately 15% from the LaRonde Mine, 19% from the Goldex Minemine and 12%approximately 10% from the Lapa Mine.mine. In 2011,2013, the Company anticipates that theits Quebec Regionproperties will account for 40%approximately 28% of the Company's gold production, of which 13%, 16%18% and 11%10% of the Company's gold production will come from the LaRonde Mine, the Goldex Minemine and the Lapa Mine,mine, respectively.

The Company's Nunavut Region isproperties are comprised of the Meadowbank Minemine and the Meliadine project, which are both held directly by the Company. In 2010,2012, the Meadowbank Minemine accounted for 27%approximately 35% of the Company's gold production (after achieving commercial production in March 2010) and the Company anticipates that itin 2013 the Meadowbank mine will account for approximately 31%36% of the Company's 2011 gold production.

The Company's operations in the European Segment are conducted through its indirect subsidiary, Agnico-EagleAgnico Eagle Finland Oy, which indirectly owns the Kittila Minemine in Finland. In 2010,2012, the Kittila Minemine accounted for 13%approximately 17% of the Company's gold production and the Company anticipates that in 20112013 the Kittila Minemine will again account for 13%approximately 17% of the Company's gold production.

The Company's operations inIn the Latin American Region, the Company's mining at Pinos Altos are conducted through its subsidiary, Agnico Eagle Mexico S.A. de C.V., which owns the Pinos Altos Mine,mine, including the Creston Mascota deposit. The La India mine project is owned by the Company's indirect subsidiary, Agnico Sonora, S.A. de C.V. In 2010,2012, the Pinos Altos Minemine accounted for 13%approximately 23% of the Company's gold production and the Company anticipates that in 20112013 the Pinos Altos Minemine will account for 16%approximately 19% of the Company's gold production.

The Exploration Segment includes the Company's grassroots exploration operations in the United States, the European exploration office, the Canadian exploration offices the Meliadine project and the Latin American exploration office. In addition, the Company has an international exploration officeoffices in Reno, Nevada.Nevada and Vancouver, Canada.

1618            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Agnico-Eagle's expertise in acquiring and developing mines is shown through the successful launch of six operating mines. The following table sets out the date of acquisition, the date of commencement of construction and the date of achieving commercial production for the Company's mines and mine projects.

  
  Date of Acquisition Date of Commencement
of Construction
 Date of achieving
Commercial Production
 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
LaRonde 1992(1)1985 1988 

Goldex December 1993(1)July 2005 August 2008 

Kittila November 2005 June 2006 May 2009 

Lapa June 2003(1)June 2006 May 2009 

Pinos Altos March 2006 August 2007 November 2009 

Meadowbank April 2007 Pre-April 2007 March 2010 

Meliadine project July 2010 2015(2)2015(2) 

  
  Date of Acquisition (1) Date of Commencement
of Construction
 Date of achieving
Commercial Production
 
  
LaRonde mine 1992 1985 1988 

Lapa mine June 2003 June 2006 May 2009 

Goldex mine project (2) December 1993 July 2012 Second quarter of 2014(3) 

Kittila mine November 2005 June 2006 May 2009 

Pinos Altos mine March 2006 August 2007 November 2009 

La India mine project November 2011 September 2012 Second quarter of 2014(3) 

Meadowbank mine April 2007 Pre-April 2007 March 2010 

Notes:

(1)
Date when 100% ownership was acquired.

(2)
Construction of infrastructure for purposes of mining the Goldex Extraction Zone (the "GEZ") commenced in July 2005 and the GEZ achieved commercial production in August 2008. Mining operations on the GEZ were suspended in October 2011. In July 2012, the Company approved the construction of a mine at the M and E Zones at Goldex.

(3)
Anticipated.

The Company's exploration program focuses primarily on the identification of new mineral reserves and resources and new development opportunities in proven gold producing regions. Current exploration activities are concentrated in Canada, Europe, Latin America and the United States. Several projects were evaluated during the year2012 in other countries where the Company believes the potential for gold occurrences is excellent and which the Company believes to be politically stable and supportive of the mining industry. The Company currently manages 7869 properties in Canada, 11four properties in Nevada and Idaho in the United States, three groups of properties in Finland, threeone property in Sweden, eight projects in Mexico and one project in Argentina. Exploration activities are managed from offices in Val d'Or, Quebec; Reno, Nevada; Chihuahua, Mexico; Kittila, Finland; and Vancouver, British Columbia.

In addition, the Company continuously evaluates opportunities to make strategic acquisitions. FourFive of the Company's new mines or projects came from relatively recent acquisitions.

In the second quarter of 2004, the Company acquired an approximate 14% ownership interest in Riddarhyttan Resources AB ("Riddarhyttan"), a Swedish precious and base metals exploration and development company that was at the time listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. In November 2005, the Company completed a tender offer (the "Riddarhyttan Offer") for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Riddarhyttan that it did not own. The Company issued 10,023,882 of its common shares and paid and committed an aggregate of $5.1 million cash as consideration to Riddarhyttan shareholders in connection with the Riddarhyttan Offer. The Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, currently holds 100% of Riddarhyttan.On March 28, 2011, Riddarhyttan was merged with Agnico-Eagle AB and Agnico-Eagle Sweden AB, with Agnico-Eagle Sweden AB as the continuing entity. The Kittila Mine,mine, located approximately 900 kilometres north of Helsinki near the town of Kittila in Finnish Lapland, is currently 100% owned by Agnico-Eagle Finland Oy, which is owned by Riddarhyttan through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Agnico-Eagle Sweden AB.

In the first quarter of 2005, the Company entered into an exploration and option agreement with Industrias Penoles S.A. de C.V. ("Penoles") to acquire the Pinos Altos property in northern Mexico. The Pinos Altos property is comprised of approximately 11,000 hectares in the Sierra Madre gold belt, approximately 225 kilometres west of the city of Chihuahua in the state of Chihuahua in northern Mexico. In February 2006, the Company exercised its option and acquired the Pinos Altos property on March 15, 2006. Under the terms of the exploration and option agreement, the purchase price of $66.8 million was comprised of $32.5 million in cash and 2,063,635 common shares of the Company.

In February 2007, the Company made an exchange offer for all of the outstanding shares of Cumberland Resources Ltd. ("Cumberland") not already owned by the Company. At the time, Cumberland was a pre-production development stage company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") and American Stock Exchange whose primary asset was the Meadowbank property. In May 2007, the Company acquired approximately 92% of the issued and outstanding shares of Cumberland that it did not previously own and, in July 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of all Cumberland

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            19

Table of Contents



shares by way of a compulsory acquisition. The Company issued 13,768,510 of its common shares and paid $9.6 million in cash as consideration to Cumberland shareholders in connection with its acquisition of Cumberland.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            17

Table of Contents


In April 2010, the Company entered into an agreement in principle with Comaplex Minerals Corp. ("Comaplex") whereby the Company wouldto acquire all of the outstanding shares of Comaplex that it did not already own. At the time, Comaplex owned a 100% interest in the advanced stage Meliadine gold property, which is located approximately 300 kilometres southeast of the Company's Meadowbank Mine.mine. In May 2010, the Company executed the definitive agreements with Comaplex and, in July 2010 by plan of arrangement, the Company acquired 100% of the Meliadine gold property through the acquisition of Comaplex, which was renamed Meliadine Holdings Inc. ("Meliadine"). Pursuant to the arrangement, Comaplex transferred to Geomark Exploration Ltd. all assets and related liabilities other than those relating to the Meliadine project. In connection with the arrangement, the Company issued 10,210,848 of its common shares as consideration to Comaplex shareholders. On January 1,

In September 2011, the Company amalgamatedentered into an acquisition agreement with Meliadine.Grayd Resource Corporation ("Grayd"), a Canadian-based natural resource company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange, pursuant to which the Company agreed to make an offer to acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Grayd. At the time, Grayd held a 100% interest in the La India property located in the Mulatos Gold Belt of Sonora, Mexico and had recently discovered the Tarachi gold porphyry prospect located approximately ten kilometres north of the La India property. In October 2011, the Company made the offer by way of a take-over bid circular, as amended and supplemented, and, in November 2011, acquired approximately 95% of the outstanding common shares of Grayd. In January 2012, the Company completed a compulsory acquisition of the remaining outstanding common shares of Grayd and Grayd became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In aggregate, the Company issued 1,319,418 of its common shares and paid C$179.7 million in cash as consideration to Grayd shareholders in connection with the transaction.

In 2010,2012, the Company's capital expenditures were $512$445.6 million. The 20102012 capital expenditures included $97$75.2 million at the LaRonde Mine (which included approximately $62mine, $18.5 million of expenditures relating toat the LaRonde Mine extension), $24Lapa mine, $26.8 million at the Goldex Mine, $72mine project, $60.0 million at the Kittila Mine, $33 million at the Lapa Mine, $104mine, $30.0 million at the Pinos Altos Minemine (which included approximately $43$5.8 million related to the Creston Mascota deposit), $174$39.2 million at the La India mine project, $105.1 million at the Meadowbank Mine and $8mine, $83.3 million at the Meliadine project and $7.5 million at other minor projects. In addition, the Company spent $50$5.0 million on mine-sitemine site exploration and $55$104.5 million on exploration activities at the Company's grassroots exploration properties, including corporate development expenses.

Budgeted 20112013 capital expenditures of $313$596 million include $96$91 million at the LaRonde Mine (including $55mine, $19 million onat the LaRonde Mine extension), $26Lapa mine, $63 million at the Goldex Mine, $14 million at the Lapa Mine, $31mine project (M and E Zones), $75 million at the Pinos Altos Mine (including $5mine, $92 million on the construction and development at the Creston Mascota deposit), $52La India mine project, $73 million at the Kittila Mine, $53mine, $79 million at the Meadowbank Minemine and $41$38 million in capitalized exploration expenditures. In addition, the Company plans exploration expenditures on grassroots exploration projects of approximately $105$71 million, including $65$17 million at the Meliadine project. Depending on the success of the exploration programs at these and other properties, the Company may be required to make additional capital expenditures for exploration, development and pre-production.

The financingfunds for the expenditures set out above isare expected to be from internally generated cash flow from operations, from the Company's existing cash balances and from drawdowns of the Company's bank credit facility. Please see "Item 10 Additional Information – Material Contracts – Credit Agreement". Based on current funding available to the Company and expected cash flows from operations, the Company believes it has sufficient funds available to fund its 2013 projected capital expenditures for all its properties.

Capital expenditures by the Company in 20092011 and 20082010 were $657$482.8 million and $909$512 million, respectively. The 20092011 capital expenditures included $76$90.7 million at the LaRonde Minemine (which included approximately $39$49.5 million of expenditures relating to the LaRonde Minemine extension), $22$18.4 million at the Lapa mine, $42.2 million at Goldex, Mine, $90$86.5 million at the Kittila Mine (which included $36 million of expenditures on construction of the underground mine), $47 million at the Lapa Mine (which included $22 million on construction of the mine), $133mine, $40.0 million at the Pinos Altos Mine and $288mine (which included approximately $7.6 million related to the Creston Mascota deposit), $116.9 million at the Meadowbank Mine.mine and $73.9 million at the Meliadine project. In addition, the Company spent $55$11.0 on mine site exploration and $64.7 million on exploration activities at the Company's grassroots exploration properties. The 20082010 capital expenditures included $75$97 million at the LaRonde Minemine (which was comprised of $38included approximately $62 million of sustaining capital expenditures and $37 million comprised primarily of expenditures onrelating to the LaRonde Minemine extension), $53$33 million at the Lapa mine, $24 million at Goldex, Mine, $196$72 million at the Kittila Mine, $89 million at the Lapa Mine, $176mine, $104 million at the Pinos Altos Mine and $314mine (which included approximately $43 million related to the Creston Mascota deposit), $174 million at the Meadowbank Mine.mine and $8 million at the Meliadine project and other minor properties. In addition, the Company spent $35 million on exploration activities at the Company's grassroots exploration properties.

The Company was formed by articles of amalgamation under the laws of the Province of Ontario on June 1, 1972, as a result of the amalgamation of Agnico Mines Limited ("Agnico Mines") and Eagle Gold Mines Limited ("Eagle"). Agnico

20            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Mines was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario on January 21, 1953 under the name "Cobalt Consolidated Mining Corporation Limited". Eagle was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario on August 14, 1945.

On December 19, 1989, Agnico-Eagle acquired the remaining 57% interest in Dumagami Mines Limited not already owned by it, as a consequence of the amalgamation of Dumagami Mines Limited with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agnico-Eagle, to continue as one company under the name Dumagami Mines Inc. ("Dumagami"). On December 29, 1992, Dumagami transferred all of its property and assets, including the LaRonde Mine,mine, to Agnico-Eagle and was subsequently dissolved.

On December 8, 1993, the Company acquired the remaining 46.3% interest in Goldex Mines Limited not already owned by it, as a consequence of the amalgamation of Goldex Mines Limited with a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to continue as one company under the name Goldex Mines Limited. On January 1, 1996, the Company amalgamated with two wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Goldex Mines Limited.

18            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


In October 2001, under a plan of arrangement, the Company amalgamated with an associated corporation, Mentor Exploration and Development Co., Limited ("Mentor"). In connection with the arrangement, the Company issued 369,348 of its common shares in consideration for the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mentor that it did not already own.

On August 1, 2007, the Company, Agnico-Eagle Acquisition Corporation, Cumberland and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cumberland, Meadowbank Mining Corporation, amalgamated under the laws of the Province of Ontario and continued under the name of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited.

On January 1, 2011, the Company and 1816276 Ontario Inc. (the successor corporation to Meliadine, which in turn was the successor corporation to Comaplex) amalgamated under the laws of the Province of Ontario and continued under the name of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited.

On January 1, 2013, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, 1886120 Ontario Inc. (the successor corporation to 9237-4925 Québec Inc.), amalgamated under the laws of the Province of Ontario and continued under the name of Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited.

The Company's executive and registered office is located at Suite 400, 145 King Street East, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 2Y7; telephone number (416) 947-1212; website: http://www.agnico-eagle.com. The information contained on the website is not part of this Form 20-F. The Company's principal place of business in the United States is located at 8725 Technology1675 E. Prater Way, Suite B, Reno,102, Sparks, Nevada 89521.89434.


Business Overview

The Company believes that it has a number of key operating strengths that provide distinct competitive advantages.

Growth Profile.    The Company has a proven track record of increasing production capacity at existing operations through a combination of acquisitions, operational improvements, expansions and development. The suspension of mining operations at the Goldex mine in October 2011 had a negative impact on the growth profile, however, the Company anticipates increasing its production toof between 1.13 million970,000 and 1.23 million1,010,000 ounces of gold in 2011 with continued growth to 2014. The Company's production2013 and growth in 2011 is2014 with the expected to come principally from the Meadowbank Mine, as well as from the continued operational improvementscommencement of production at the Kittila, LapaLa India and Pinos Altos Mines.Goldex mine projects. Over the last fourfive years, the Company has spent over $2.6$2.7 billion on the development of five new mines and itsthe significant extension of the LaRonde Minemine at depth. With the large majority of mine development projects complete and with six mines having achieved steady state operational status, capital expenditures are expected to decline materially from 2011 onward, significantly increasing free cash flow. Future capital expenditures are expected to be primarily for incremental expansion projects and exploration and development of the La India and Goldex mine projects and the Meliadine project.

Operations in Politically Stable, Mining-FriendlyMining Friendly Regions.    The Company and its predecessors have over three decades of continuous gold production experience and expertise in metals mining. The Company's operations and exploration and development projects are located in regions that the Company believes are supportive of the mining industry. Three of theThe Company's producingLaRonde and Lapa mines and one of its construction projectsGoldex mine project are located in the Abitibi region of northwestern Quebec, one of North America's principal gold-producing regions. The policy potential index measures the effects on exploration of a variety of government policies related to the mining industry. The Company's Kittila Minemine in northern Finland, Pinos Altos Minemine and La India mine project in northern Mexico and Meadowbank Minemine and Meliadine project in Nunavut are also located in regions which the Company believes are also supportive of the mining industry.

Low-Cost, Efficient Operations.    The Company believes that its total cash costs per ounce place it below the industry average for producers in the gold mining industry, with total cash costs per ounce of gold produced at $451 for 2010, $346 for 2009 and $162 per ounce for 2008. These relatively low cash costs are attributable to the economies of scale afforded by the Company's mining operations, as well as byproduct metal revenues from the LaRonde and Pinos Altos Mines and sharing of resources among its three operating mines in northwestern Quebec. In addition, the Company believes its highly motivated work force contributes significantly to continued operational improvements and to the Company's low-cost producer status.

Strong Operating Base.    Through its acquisition, exploration and development program, the Company has been transformed from a regionally focused, single mine producer to a multi-mine international gold producer with sixfive operating, 100% owned mines. The Company's existing operations at the LaRonde Mineits existing mines provide a strong base for additional

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            21

Table of Contents



mineral reserve and production development at the property and in the Abitibi region of northwestern Quebecthese properties and for the development of its mines and growth projects in Nunavut, Finland, Mexico and Mexico.the Abitibi region. The experience gained through building and operating the LaRonde Minemine has assisted with the Company's development of its other mine projects. In addition, the extensive infrastructure associated with the LaRonde Minemine supports the nearby Lapa mine and Goldex and Lapa Mines, and the construction of infrastructure to access the depositsmine project. Experience gained at the LaRonde Mine extension.Meadowbank mine in Nunavut is assisting with the Company's permitting and exploration work at the nearby Meliadine project. Similarly, experience building and operating the Pinos Altos mine in Chihuahua, Mexico has assisted the Company's efforts to develop the La India mine project 70 kilometres away in Sonora, Mexico.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            19

Table of Contents


Highly Experienced Management Team.    The members of the Company's senior management team have an average of over 2322 years of experience in the mining industry. Management's significant experience has underpinned the Company's historical growth and provides a solid base upon which to expand the Company's operations.

Based on these strengths, the Company's corporate strategy is to grow low-cost production and reserves in mining-friendly regions.

Optimize and Further Expand Operations.    The Company continues to focus its resources and efforts on the exploration and development of its properties in Quebec, Nunavut, Finland and Mexico with a view to increasing annual gold production and gold mineral reserves.

Leverage Mining Experience.    The Company believes it can benefit not only from the existing infrastructure at its mines but also from the geological knowledge that it has gained in mining and developing its properties. The Company's strategy is to capitalize on its mining expertise to exploit fully the potential of its properties.

Expand Gold Reserves.    The Company is conducting drilling programs at all of its properties with a goal of further increasing its gold reserves. In 2010,2012, on a contained gold ounces basis, the Company increased its gold reserves to 21.3of the Company were 18.68 million ounces (185.8(184 million tonnes grading 3.573.16 grams of gold per tonne), an increase of 16% overessentially unchanged from the 18.75 million ounces reported as at December 31, 2009 levels, including the replacement of 987,609 ounces of gold mined.2011.

Growth Through Primary Exploration and Acquisitions.    The Company's growth strategy has been to pursue the expansion of its development base through the acquisition of additional properties in the Americas and Europe. Historically, the Company's producing properties have resulted from a combination of investments in advanced exploration companies and primary exploration activities. By investing in pre-development stage companies, the Company believes that it has been able to acquire control of projects at favourable prices and reasonable valuations.


Mining Legislation and Regulation

Canada

The mining industry in Canada operates under both federal and provincial or territorial legislation governing prospecting and the exploration, development, operation and decommissioning of mines and mineral processing facilities. Such legislation relates to the method of acquisition and ownership of mining rights, labour, occupational or worker health and safety standards, royalties, mining, exports, reclamation, closure and rehabilitation of mines and other matters. Laws and regulations regarding the decommissioning, reclamation and rehabilitation of mines may require approval by provincial or territorial authorities of reclamation plans, provision of financial guarantees and long-term management of closed mines and related waste and tailings. Obligations under mining legislation may arise with respect to proposed, operating and closed facilities (including those that the Company owns but never operated).

The mining industry in Canada is also subject to extensive laws and regulations at both the federal and provincial or territorial levels concerning the protection of the environment. The primary federal regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over the Company's mining operations in respect of environmental matters are the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Canada) and Environment Canada. The construction, development and operation of a mine, mill or refinery requires compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and/or review processes, including obtaining land use permits, water permits, air emissions certifications, industrial depollution attestations, hazardous substances management and similar authorizations from various governmental agencies. Environmental laws and regulations impose high standards on the mining industry to reduce or eliminate the effects of waste generated by mining and processing operations and subsequently deposited on the ground or affecting the air or water. Laws and regulations regarding the decommissioning, reclamation and rehabilitation of mines may require approval of reclamation plans, provision of financial guarantees and long-term management of closed mines.

Quebec

In Quebec, mining rights are governed by theMining Act (Quebec) and, subject to limited exceptions, are owned by the province. A mining claim entitles its holder to explore for minerals on the subject land. It remains in force for a term of two

22            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



years from the date it is registered and may be renewed indefinitely subject to continued exploration works in relation thereto. In order to retain title to mining claims, in addition to paying a small bi-annual rental fee currently ranging from C$2627.75 to C$120126 per claim, depending on its location and area (as set by Quebec government regulations), exploration work (or an equivalent value cash payment) has to be completed in advance (either on the claim or on adjacent mining claims, concessions or leases) and filed with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Quebec) prior to the date of expiry of the claim. The amount of exploration work required bi-annually currently ranges from C$48 to C$3,600 per claim, depending on its location, area and period of validity (as set by Quebec government regulations). In 1966, the mining concession system set out for lands containing mineralized zones in theMining Act (Quebec) was replaced by a system of mining leases, but the mining concessions sold prior to such replacement remain in force. A mining lease entitles its holder

20            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



to mine and remove valuable mineral substances from the subject land, provided it pays the annual rent set by Quebec government regulations, which currently ranges from C$2121.50 per hectare (on privately held land) to C$4345 per hectare (on land owned by the province). Leases are granted initially for a term of 20 years and are renewable up to three times, each for a duration of ten years. After the third renewal, the Minister of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Quebec) may grant an extension thereof on the conditions, for the rental and for the term he or she determines.

Bill 79,An Act to amend the Mining Act, which was introduced in the Quebec National Assembly in December 2009, is still pending and, if adopted, will amend a number of rules relating to the mining regime in Quebec, mainly to stimulate mining exploration. However, it is too early to determine the final form that the amendments will take and what effect, if any, these amendments may have on the Company's operations.

In Quebec, the primary provincial regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over the Company's mining operations in respect of environmental matters are the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment, Wildlife and Parks (Quebec) and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Quebec).

Nunavut

As a result ofUnder the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement (the "Land Claims Agreement") of July 1993,, ownership of large tracts of land in Nunavut was granted to the Inuit. These Inuit-owned lands include areas with high mineral potential. Further, as a result of other rights granted to the Inuit inunder the Land Claims Agreement, Inuit organizations play an important role in the management of natural resources and the environment in Nunavut. These duties are shared among the federal and territorial governments and Inuit organizations. Under the Land Claims Agreement, the Inuit own surface rights to certain lands representing approximately 16% of Nunavut. For a portion of the Inuit-owned lands representing approximately 2% of Nunavut, the Inuit also own mineral (subsurface) rights in addition to the surface rights.

In Nunavut, the Crown's mineral rights are administered by the Department of IndianAboriginal Affairs and Northern Affairs (Canada)Development Canada in accordance with theNorthwest Territories and Nunavut Mining Regulations (the "Territorial Mining Regulations") under theTerritorial Lands Act (Canada). The Inuit mineral rights in subsurface Inuit-owned lands are owned and administered by Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated ("Nunavut Tunngavik"), a corporation representing the Inuit people of Nunavut.

Future production from Nunavut Tunngavik-administered mineral claims is subject to production leases which include a 12% net profits interest royalty from which annual deductions are limited to 85% of gross revenue. Production from Crown mining leases is subject to a royalty of up to 14% of adjusted net profits, as defined in the Territorial Mining Regulations. Before the operation of a major development projectMajor Development Project, as defined in the Land Claims Agreement, can begin, developers must also negotiate an impact benefits agreementInuit Impact and Benefit Agreement ("IIBA") with the regional Inuit Association.

The Kivalliq Inuit Association (the "KIA"("KIA")is the Inuit organization that holds surface rightstitle to the Inuit-owned lands in the Kivalliq region and is responsible for administering surface rights on these lands on behalf of the Inuit of the region. In order to conduct exploration work on Inuit-owned lands, the Company is required to submit a project proposal or work plan. This proposal is subject to approval by the KIA for surface land tenure and to review by other boards established by the Land Claims Agreement to determine environmental effects and, if needed, to grant water rights. Federal and territorial government departments participate in the reviews conducted by these boards. For mine development, the Company requires a surface lease and water compensation agreement with the KIA and a licence under federal legislation for the use of water, including the deposit of waste.

During mine construction and operations, the Company is subject to additional Nunavut and federal government regulations related to environmental, safety, fire and other operational matters.

Finland

Mining legislation in Finland consists of the Mining Act, the Mining Decree, the Mining Safety Decree and the Mining Decree, which are currently being amended.Hoisting Equipment Decree. The Council of State introduced the proposal for a revisednew Mining Act was implemented on July 1, 2011 and replaced the previous Mining Act (503/1965) as a result of still on-going overall reform of mining legislation in the form of a government bill (the "Proposal") to the Finnish Parliament on December 22, 2009. The review of the Proposal by the Commerce Committee is ongoing and, according to information released by the committee on January 24, 2011, the review will continue into 2011 with no definitive timetable for the next step of the process. The review of the Proposal may not continue until after a new Parliament is elected in Finland on April 17, 2011. Unless otherwise stated, the summary setFinland. Set out below reflects the Mining Act as currently in force.

In Finland, any corporation having its principal placeis a general, brief overview of business or central administration within the European Economic Area is entitled to the same rights to carry out prospecting, to stake a claim and to exploit a deposit, as anycertain relevant aspects of Finnish citizen or corporation.mining legislation.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            2123

Table of Contents


In general, prospecting does not require any special licenceFinland, subject to certain area restrictions, anyone has a right irrespective of land ownership to conduct survey work and make geological measurements and observations, with the right to take small samples from the authorities, except under certain circumstances as set out insoil provided that these measures do not cause other than only minor damage or inconvenience. However, before sampling, a notice must be given to the Mining Act. The Proposal does not include any fundamental changes in this respect. If there are no impediments to granting a claim,owner of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy (the "MEE") is obliged to grant the applicant arespective land.

A prospecting licence, whichpermit is required if the prospector wishesfor more comprehensive survey work. The prospecting permit entitles its holder to examine theconduct necessary research and exploration in a defined area in order to determinediscover the sizequality and extent of a deposit and to build or move temporary facilities and machinery onto the prospecting area for such purposes. The prospecting permit does not grant a right to exploit a deposit, for which purpose a mining permit is required, but it does grant its holder a priority to receive the mining permit on the prospecting area.

A mining permit entitles its holder to exploit all minerals found on the mining area defined in the permit as well as all organic and non-organic surface material and the scope ofsoil and bedrock, as considered necessary for the deposit. A prospecting licence is in force for one to five years, depending on the scope of the search for mineable minerals, and the MEE has no power of discretion as to the material meritspurposes of the mining operation. Underwork. In addition to the Proposal,mining permit, a mining safety permit regarding safety measures of the contemplated mining operations is required in order to build and operate a mine.

Generally, the mining area must either be owned or leased by the permit holder. However, provided that the mining project is required by the public interest, the Council of State of Finland may in certain cases grant a mining area redemption permit, which entitles the holder to establish a mining area without the consent of the landowner if the mining operator and the landowner cannot come to a voluntary agreement regarding use of the land.

The Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency is responsible for granting prospecting licence wouldpermits, mining permits and mining safety permits upon an application, provided that statutory requirements are fulfilled. Prospecting permits and mining permits are transferrable and eligible to be in forcepledged as security under Finnish law.

Prospecting permits are issued for afixed periods of time (a maximum period of four years and couldat a time, which can be extended for three-year periods, up to a maximum of 15 years). Mining permits are generally granted without an expiry date. However, the Safety and Chemicals Agency investigates grounds for the continued existence of the permit at least once every ten years. The Proposal would also changeIn some cases, depending on the licensing authorityprevailing circumstances and the application procedure in order to permit more comprehensive hearingsdeposit, mining permits may only be granted for a fixed period of time (to a maximum period of ten years at a time). Prospecting permits and mining permits may be cancelled if the holder of the parties.permit does not perform mining operations in accordance with the terms of the permit or the permit holder violates rules of the Mining Act.

Without specific permission of the National Board of Patents and Registrations of Finland, a right to apply for and acquire a prospecting permit and/or mining permit is limited to Finnish corporations and individuals and foreign individuals and corporations domiciled in a state belonging to the European Economic Area.

In orderaddition to obtain the rights to the mineable minerals located on a claim, the claimant must apply to the MEE for the appropriation of acompliance with mining patent. When thelegislation, all mining patent procedure has become final regarding all matters other than compensation, the MEE must issue the mining operator a mining certificate which gives the holder the right to fully exploit all mineable minerals found in the mining patent. Under the Proposal, a mining patent is to be replaced by a mining licence and, before the mining operator can start exploiting the land, a mining survey under the revised Mining Act by the surveying office would be required. Also, an expropriation licence relating to the mining area may be required if the mining operator and the owner of the land cannot come to a voluntary agreement on the use of the land in question for mining purposes. If in the public interest, the expropriation licence will be granted by the Council of State to the mining operator. When the mining survey has become final regarding all matters other than compensation and the surveying office's decision has become non-appealable, the mining operator can start exploiting the land.

Mining operations must be carried out in accordance with the permit terms and with laws and regulations concerning conservation and environmental protection issues. Under the Finnish Environmental Protection Act, mining activities require an environmental permit which may be issued either for a definite or indefinite period of time. The Environmental Protection Act is based on the principles of prevention and minimization of damages and hazards, the application of the best available technology, the application of the best environmental practice and the "polluter pays". principle.

The Act on Compensation for Environmental Damage includes provisions on the compensation for damage to a person or a property resulting from pollution of water, air, soil, noise, vibration, radiation, light, heat, smell or other similar nuisances, caused by an activity carried out at a fixed location. This act is based on the principle of strict liability.

In addition to an environmental permit,the permits listed above, mining operators may require several other permits and aremay be subject to other obligations under environmental protectionFinnish legislation.

According to the Act on Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure, certain projects require compliance with an environmental impact assessment procedure. These include major projects with a considerable impact on the environment, such as the excavation, enrichment and handling of metals and other minerals in cases where the excavated material is estimated to exceed 550,000 tonnes annually. Aannually or the operating area exceeds 25 hectares. An environmental permit authority may not give its approval to an activity covered by the scope of the Act on the Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure without having taken an environmental impact assessment report into consideration.

Mexico

Mining in Mexico is subject to the Mining Law, a federal law. Under the Mexican Constitution, all minerals belong to the Mexican Nation. Private parties may explore and extract minerals pursuant to mining concessions granted by the

24            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



executive branch of the Mexican government, which as a general rule, are granted to whoever first claims them. While the Mining Law touches briefly upon labour, occupational and worker health and safety standards, these are primarily dealt with by the Federal Labour Law. The Mining Law also briefly addresses environmental matters, which are primarily regulated by the General Law of Ecological Balance and Protection of the Environment, also of federal jurisdiction.

The primary agencies with jurisdiction over mining activities are the Ministry of the Economy, the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare and the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources. The National Water Commission has jurisdiction regarding the granting of water rights and the Ministry of Defense with respect to the use of explosives.

Concessions are granted for 50 years, renewable once. The main obligations to keep concessions current are the semi-annual payment of mining duties (taxes), based on the surface area of the concession, and the performance of work in the areas covered by the concessions, which is evidenced by minimum expenditures or by the extraction of ore.

22            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Organizational Structure

The Company's significant subsidiaries (all of which are directly or indirectly wholly-owned by the Company, unless otherwise indicated) are Riddarhyttan, 1715495 Ontario Inc., Agnico-Eagle Mines Sweden Cooperatie U.A., which owns all of the shares of Agnico-Eagle Sweden AB, a Swedish company through which the Company holds its interest in Riddarhyttan, Oijarvi Resources Oy, and Agnico-Eagle AB, a Swedish company through which Riddarhyttan holds its interest in Agnico-Eagle Finland Oy, a Finnish company through which the Kittila Minemine is held. In addition, theThe Company's interest in the Pinos Altos Minemine in northern Mexico is held through its direct and indirect wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary, Agnico Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which is, in turn, owned, in part, by 1641315 Ontario Inc. and Tenedora Agnico Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which is, in turn, owned in part by Agnico-Eagle Mines Mexico Cooperatie U.A. The Company's interest in the La India mine project in Mexico is held through its indirect wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary, Agnico Sonora, S.A. de C.V., which is owned by Grayd, Agnico Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Tenedora Agnico Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V. The LaRonde Mine (includingmine, the LaRonde Mine extension),Lapa mine, the Goldex Mine, the Lapa Mine,mine project, the Meadowbank Minemine and the Meliadine project are owned directly by the Company.

TheCertain of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries, Servicios Agnico Eagle Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Servicios Pinos Altos, S.A. de C.V. and Minera Agave, S.A. de C.V., provide services in connection with the Company's operations in Mexico. The Company's operations in the United States are conducted through Agnico-Eagle (USA) Limited.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            25

Table of Contents


The following chart sets out the corporate structure of the Company, each of its significant subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries, together with the jurisdiction of organization of the Company and each such subsidiary as at March 18, 2011:11, 2013:

Agnico-Eagle Organizational Chart

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


1
In January 2011, Agnico-Eagle Sweden AB, Agnico-Eagle AB and Riddarhyttan Resources AB began the process of merging with Agnico-Eagle Sweden AB as the continuing entity. The merger is expected to be effective on or about March 28, 2011.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT26                        23AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Property, Plant and Equipment

Location Map of the Abitibi Region (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

LaRonde Mine

The LaRonde Minemine is situated approximately halfway between the City of Rouyen-NorandaRouyn-Noranda and the City of Val d'Or in northwestern Quebec (approximately 470 kilometres northwest of Montreal, Quebec) in the municipalities of Preissac and Cadillac. At December 31, 2010,2012, the LaRonde Minemine was estimated to containhave proven and probable mineral reserves ofcontaining approximately 4.84.2 million ounces of gold comprised of 34.728.8 million tonnes of ore grading 4.324.54 grams per tonne. The Company's LaRonde Minemine consists of the LaRonde property and the adjacent El Coco and Terrex properties, each of which is 100% owned and operated by the Company. The LaRonde Minemine can be accessed either from Val d'Or in the east or from Rouyn-Noranda in the west, each of which are located approximately 60 kilometres from the LaRonde Minemine via Quebec provincial highway No. 117. The LaRonde Minemine is situated approximately two kilometres north of highway No. 117 on Quebec regional highway No. 395. The Company has access to the Canadian National Railway at Cadillac, Quebec, approximately six kilometres from the LaRonde Mine.mine.

The LaRonde Minemine operates under mining leases obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Quebec) and under certificates of approval granted by the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment, Wildlife and Parks (Quebec). The LaRonde property consists of 3536 contiguous mining claims and one provincial mining lease and covers in total 1,044.91,047.4 hectares. The El Coco property consists of 22 contiguous mining claims and one provincial mining lease and covers in total 356.7 hectares. The Terrex property consists of 21 mining claims that cover in total 424.4 hectares. The mining leases on the LaRonde and El Coco properties expire in 2018 and 2021, respectively, and are automatically renewable for three further ten-year terms upon payment of a small fee. The Company also has three surface rights leases that cover in total approximately 250.5301.5 hectares that relate to the water pipeline right of way from Lake Preissac and the eastern extension of the LaRonde tailings pond #7 on the El Coco property. The surface rights leases are renewable annually.

24            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            27

Table of Contents


Location Map of the LaRonde Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

The LaRonde Minemine includes underground operations at the LaRonde and El Coco properties that can both be accessed from the Penna Shaft, a mill, a treatment plant, a secondary crusher building and related facilities. The El Coco property is subject to a 50% net profits interest in favour of Barrick Gold Corporation ("Barrick") on future production from approximately 500 metres east of the LaRonde property boundary. The remaining 1,500 metres is subject to a 4% net smelter return royalty. This area of the property is now substantially mined out and the Company has not paid royalties since 2004 and does not expect to pay royalties in 2011.2013. In 2003, exploration work started to extend outside of the LaRonde property onto the Terrex property where a down-plunge extension of Zone 20 North was discovered. The Terrex property is subject to a 5% net profits royalty to Delfer Gold Mines Inc. and a 2% net smelter return royalty to Barrick. The Company does not expect to pay royalties onin respect of this part of the property in 2011.2013. In addition, the Company owns 100% of the Sphinx property immediately to the east of the El Coco property. In 2012, 18% of the ore processed from the LaRonde mine was extracted from the deeper portion of the LaRonde mine (that is, below Level 245), that was previously referred to as the "LaRonde extension". In 2013, the Company anticipates that approximately 49% of the ore processed will be from this deeper part of the mine.

In 2011,2013, payable gold production at the LaRonde Minemine is expected to declineincrease to approximately 157,000177,000 ounces, and total cash costs per ounce are expected to be approximately $54.$650. The Company expects future byproduct metal recoveries at the LaRonde mine to decline as production continues to shift towards deeper sections of the mine where gold grades are higher and byproduct metals are less prevalent. The decreased byproduct revenues will result in higher total cash costs per ounce attributable to ore extracted from these parts of the mine.

The Abitibi region has a continental climate with average annual rainfall of 64 centimetres and average annual snowfall of 318 centimetres. The average monthly temperatures range from a minimum of -23 degrees Celsius in January to a maximum of 23 degrees Celsius in July. Under normal circumstances, mining operations are conducted year-round without interruption due to weather conditions. The Company believes that the Abitibi region of northwestern Quebec has sufficient experienced mining personnel to staff its operations in the Abitibi region. The elevation is 337 metres above sea level. The LaRonde property is relatively flat with a maximum relief of approximately 40 metres. The topography gently slopes down from north to south and is characterized by boreal-type forest onat LaRonde and the nearby properties. All of the LaRonde Mine'smine's power requirements are supplied by Hydro-Quebec through connections to its main power transmission grid. Water used in the LaRonde Mine'smine's operations is sourced from Lake Preissac and is transported approximately four kilometres to the minesite through a surface pipeline.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT28                        25AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the LaRonde Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

The LaRonde Minemine was originally developed utilizing a 1,207-metre shaft (Shaft #1) and an underground ramp access system. The ramp access system is available down to Level 25 of Shaft #1 and continues down to Level 248 at the Penna Shaft. The mineral reserve accessible from Shaft #1 was depleted in September 2000 and Shaft #1 is no longer in use. A second production shaft (Shaft #2), located approximately 1.2 kilometres to the east of Shaft #1, was completed in 1994 to a depth of 525 metres and was used to mine Zones 6 and 7. Both ore zones were depleted in March 2000 and the workings were allowed to flood up to Level 6 (approximately 280 metres). A third shaft (the Penna Shaft), located approximately 800 metres to the east of Shaft #1, was completed down to a depth of 2,250 metres in March 2000. The Penna Shaft is used to mine Zones 20 North, 20 South, 6 and 7. In 2009, as part of the LaRonde Minemine extension, the Company completed construction of an 823-metre internal shaft from Level 206203 to access the ore below Level 245, approximately 2,858 metres below surface.

Production from the deeper levels of the LaRonde mine has only recently started to ramp-up to anticipated steady state levels and there is currently only limited development of stopes in this portion of the mine. As a result, logistical problems, such as congestion in the underground workings, occur from time to time. The Company anticipates that these issues, and any other issues that may prevent or delay extraction and transportation of ore from a particular stope, will be less prevalent when the stope development work at depth is more advanced.

Mining Methods

Four mining methods have historically been used at the LaRonde Mine:mine: open pit for the three surface deposits; sublevel retreat; longitudinal retreat with cemented rock backfill or paste backfill; and transverse open stoping with bothpaste, cemented androck backfill or unconsolidated backfill. The primary source of ore at the LaRonde Minemine continues to be from

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            29

Table of Contents



underground mining methods. During 2010,2012, two of the traditional mining methods were used: longitudinal retreat with cemented rock backfill (or pastefill)or paste backfill and transverse open stoping with both cemented (or pastefill) androck backfill, paste or unconsolidated backfill. In addition, to address concerns regarding the frequency and intensity of seismic events encountered at the lower levels of the LaRonde mine, a hybrid of these two methods was developed and used. In the underground mine, sublevels are driven at between 30-metre and 40-metre vertical intervals, depending on the depth. Stopes are undercut in 15-metre wide panels. In the longitudinal method, panels are mined in 15-metre sections and backfilled with 100% cemented rock fillbackfill or paste fill from thebackfill. The paste backfill plant was completed in 2000 and is located on the surface at the processing facility. In the transverse open stoping method, approximately 50%

26            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



of the ore is mined in the first pass and filled with cemented rock fillbackfill or paste fill.backfill. On the second pass, the remainder of the ore is mined and filled with unconsolidated waste rock fillbackfill or cemented paste backfill.

The throughput at LaRonde in 2012 averaged 6,444 tonnes per day compared with 6,593 tonnes per day in 2011. The reduced throughput in 2012 was largely due to the transition to the lower mine, where factors such as heat, congestion and lack of operational flexibility underground negatively impacted the mine's ability to provide the planned tonnage to the mill.

Surface Facilities

Surface facilities at the LaRonde Minemine include a processing plant with a daily capacity of 7,200 tonnes of ore, which has been expanded four times since 1987 from the original rate of 1,630 tonnes per day. Beginning in 1999, transition to the LaRonde Mine poly-metallicmine's poly metallic massive sulphide orebody required several modifications to the processing plant, which consisted ofincluding a new coarse orecoarse-ore handling system, new SAG and ball mill,mills, the addition of a zinc flotation circuit and capacity increases to the existing copper flotation and precious metals circuits. In 2008, the installation of a limited copper/lead separation flotation circuit, following the copper flotation circuit, was completed. Also in 2008, operation of a small cyanidation plant began operation for the treatment of sulphide concentrate from the Goldex Mine, began.mine. A new carbon-in-leach ("CIL") circuit is under construction and is expected to replace the existing LaRonde precious metal Merrill-Crowe circuit at the end of March 2013. The LaRonde mine is also the site for the Lapa Minemine ore processing plant (1,500 tonnes per day), which the Company that was commissioned in the second quarter of 2009.

The ore requires a series of grinding, copper/lead flotation and separation, zinc flotation and zinc tails precious metals leaching circuits, followed by a counter-current decantation circuit and Merrill Crowe precipitation. A pasteMerrill-Crowe precipitation (which will be replaced by CIL recovery in 2013). Paste backfill and cyanide destruction plantplants operate intermittently. The tailings area has a dedicated cyanide destruction and metals precipitation plant that water passes through prior to recirculating to the mill. A biological water treatment plant was commissioned in 2005 to address the build-up of thiocyanate in the tailings ponds at LaRonde.the LaRonde mine. This build-up was the result of the high sulphide content of the LaRonde mine ore and 90% recirculation of the process water. The plant uses bacteria to oxidize and destroy thiocyanate and removes phosphate from the water before it is released to the environment.

The Goldex concentrate circuit consists of pulp received from the Goldex mill via truck and subsequent leaching of the pulp with cyanide. The leached material iswas sent to the Lapa cyanide leach with carbonCIL circuit ("CIL") for gold recovery along with Lapa residual pulp.pulp until the Goldex circuit ceased to operate in November 2011 following the suspension of mining operations at Goldex on October 19, 2011. The Goldex circuit is currently on standby until mining begins at the M and E Zones of the Goldex mine, which is expected to occur in the second quarter of 2014. At that time, the Goldex circuit tails will be pumped directly into the new LaRonde CIL circuit, which has been designed to handle leached material from both LaRonde and Goldex. The Lapa CIL circuit is expected to be operating near full capacity by then with material from Lapa alone.

The Lapa process consists of a two-stage grinding circuit to reduce the granularity of the ore. A gravity recovery circuit that is incorporated into the grinding circuit that recovers up to 45% of the available gold, depending on feed grades. The residual pulp is leached in a conventional CIL circuit to dissolve the balance of the precious metal. The leached slurry from the Goldex concentrate circuit is mixed with the Lapa pulp for carbon contact. A carbon strip circuit recovers the gold from the carbon which is recycled to the leach circuit.

Annual production at the LaRonde mill consistsin 2013 is expected to consist of approximately 48,0002,097,023 ounces of silver, 5,223.4 tonnes of copper, concentrate, up to 7,8001,176.9 tonnes of lead concentrate and 136,00027,298.6 tonnes of zinc concentrate.zinc. Gold recovery at the LaRonde Minemine is distributed approximately 63%as follows: 57.7% in the copper concentrate, 7%6.56% in the lead concentrate, 4.25% in the zinc concentrate and 13%23.49% via leaching.

Mineral Recoveries

During 2010,2012, gold and silver recovery averaged 90.0%89.8% and 88.2%85.49%, respectively. Zinc recovery averaged 88.6%87.13% with a concentrate quality of 54.8%56.13% zinc. Copper recovery averaged 81.1%78.56% with a concentrate quality of 8.96%11.88% copper. Approximately 2.59 million tonnes of ore were processed averaging 7,102 tonnes of ore per day at 94.1% of available time.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT30                        27AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Approximately 2.36 million tonnes of ore were processed averaging 6,780 tonnes of ore per day at 95.39% of available time.

The following table sets out the metal recoveries, concentrate grades and contained metals for the 2.59 million2,358,499 tonnes of ore extracted by the Company at the LaRonde Minemine in 2010.2012.

   Copper
Concentrate
(63,353 tonnes
produced)
 Zinc
Concentrate
(121,160 tonnes
produced)
 Lead
Concentrate
(427 tonnes
produced)
          Copper
Concentrate
(37,918 tonnes
produced)
 Zinc
Concentrate
(80,987 tonnes
produced)
 Lead
Concentrate
(2,096 tonnes
produced)
     
   
 
 
          
 
 
     
 Head
Grades
 Grade Recovery Grade Recovery Grade Recovery Dore
Produced
 Overall
Metal
Recoveries
 Payable
Production
  Head
Grades
 Grade Recovery Grade Recovery Grade Recovery Overall
Metal
Recoveries
 Payable
Production
 

Gold 2.17 g/t 61.2 g/t 57.91% 2.29 g/t 5.49% 97.4 g/t 6.3% 37,879 oz 90.04% 162,647 oz  2.362 g/t 79.55 g/t 54.25% 3.25 g/t 4.81% 200.4 g/t 8.01% 89.8% 160,854 oz 

Silver 57.04 g/t 1,472 g/t 52.9% 157 g/t 14.26% 2,859 g/t 7.03% 535,023 oz 88.20% 4,193,116 oz  40.156 g/t 1,073 g/t 43.26% 177 g/t 14.78% 3,529.9 g/t 7.22% 85.49% 2,243,674 oz 

Copper 0.23% 8.96% 81.1%      81.1% 4,223 t  0.242% 11.88% 78.56% 0.42% 5.96% 4.56% 1.87% 81.03% 4,126 t 

Lead 0.37%     57.38% 21.8%  21.80% 1,954 t  0.252% 7.14% 45.68% 0.53% 7.22% 53.47% 18% 64.38% 1,058 t 

Zinc 3.204%   54.8% 88.64%    88.64% 62,543 t  2.203% 4.15% 2.98% 56.13% 87.13% 2.89% 0.2% 90.61% 38,637 t 

Environmental Matters

Currently, water is treated at various facilities at the LaRonde Minemine operations. Water contained in the tailings to be used as underground backfill is treated to degrade cyanide using a sulphur dioxide and air process. The tailings entering the tailings pond are first decanted and the clear water subjected to natural cyanide degradation. This water is then transferred to sedimentation pond #1 to undergo a secondary treatment at a plant located between sedimentation ponds #1 and #2 that uses a peroxy-silicaperoxy-silicate process to destroy cyanide, lime and coagulant to precipitate metals. The tailings pond occupies an area of about 175 hectares. Waste rock that is not used underground for backfill is brought up to the surface and stored in close proximity to the tailings pond to be used to build coffer dams inside the pond. A waste rock pile containing approximately one million500,000 tonnes of waste and occupying about nine hectares is located west of the mill.

Due to the high sulphur content of the LaRonde mine ore, the Company has had to address toxicity issues in the tailings ponds since the 1990s. Since introducing and optimizing a biological treatment plant in 2005,2004, the treatment process is now stable and the effluent has remained non-toxic since 2006. In 2006, the Company commenced an ammonia stripping operation involving an effluent partially treated by the biological treatment plant which allowed an increase in treatment flow rate, while keeping the final effluent toxicity-free. In 2009,Since 2010, the Company has operated ammonia stripping towers to further increase the treatment flow rate of the biological plant, the Company commenced construction of ammonia stripping towers, which became operational in June 2010.plant. In addition, water from mine dewatering and drainage water are treated to remove metals prior to discharge at a high-density sludge lime treatment plant located at the LaRonde mill.

Capital Expenditures

In 2006, the Company initiated construction to extend the infrastructure at the LaRonde Minemine to access the ore below Level 245, referred to as245. Hoisting from this deeper part of the LaRonde Mine extension. The LaRonde Mine extension is expected to begin contributing to productionmine began in the fourth quarter of 2011 and commercial production was achieved in November 2011. TheAccess to the deeper part of the LaRonde Mine extension infrastructure includesmine is provided through a new 823-metre internal shaft (completed in November 2009) starting from Level 203, which providesfor a total depth of 2,858 metres.metres from surface. A ramp will beis used to access the lower part of the orebody updown to 3,110 metres in depth. The internal winze system will beis used to hoist ore from depth to facilities on Level 215, approximately 2,150 metres below surface, where it will beis transferred to the Penna Shaft hoist. Excavation of the underground mining facilities is in progress.

Capital expenditures at the LaRonde Minemine during 20102012 were approximately $97$75.2 million, which included $35$22.2 million on sustaining capital expenditures and $62$41.9 million comprised primarily of expenditures on the LaRonde Mine extension.in deferred expense. Budgeted 20112013 capital expenditures at the LaRonde Minemine are $100 million, including $45 million on sustaining capital expenditures and capitalized exploration and $55 million on the LaRonde Mine extension.$91.3 million. Another $16$3 million will be added to the carbon-in-pulp ("CIP") / high density sludge ("HDS") project. At the end of 2010, the capital cost of construction of the LaRonde Mine extension is estimated to be $246 million, of which the Company had incurred $186 million as of the end of 2010. Total capital expenditures for the LaRonde Mine and the LaRonde Mine extensionmine are estimated at $292$572.1 million from 20112013 to 20242026 (including the CIP/HDSCIP project).

28            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            31

Table of Contents


Development

In 2010,2012, a total of 14,85513,113 metres of lateral development was completed. Development was focused on stope preparation of mining blocks for production in 20102012 and 2011,2013, especially the preparation of the lower mine production horizon. A total of 2,7725,213 metres of development work was completed for the LaRonde Minemine extension infrastructure and the ramp to access the LaRonde Minemine extension.

A total of 15,44013,500 metres of lateral development is planned for 2011.2013. The main focus of development work continues to be stope preparation. The Company plans to developpreparation and prepare the access to Zone 20 South down to Level 245. For the LaRonde Minemine extension a total of 6,020 metres of development is planned, mainly to developaccess toward the ramp access from the new shaft to the orebody, to complete infrastructure around the new shaft and for future ventilation infrastructure. At the same time, development work will continue to prepare for mining below Level 245.orebody.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The LaRonde property is located near the southern boundary of the Archean-age (2.7 billion years old) Abitibi Subprovince and the Pontiac Subprovince within the Superior Geological Province of the Canadian Shield. The most important regional structure is the Cadillac-Larder Lake (CLL)("CLL") fault zone marking the contact between the Abitibi and Pontiac Subprovinces, located approximately two kilometres to the south of the LaRonde property.

The geology that underlies the LaRonde Minemine consists of three east-west-trending, steeply south-dipping and generally south-facing regional groups of rock formations. From north to south, they are: (i) 400 metres (approximate true thickness) of the Kewagama Group, which is made up of a thick band of interbedded wacke; (ii) 1,500 metres of the Blake River Group, a volcanic assemblage that hosts all the known economic mineralization on the property; and (iii) 500 metres of the Cadillac Group, made up of a thick band of wacke interbedded with pelitic schist and minor iron formation.

Zones of strong sericite and chlorite alteration that enclose massive to disseminated sulphide mineralization (including the ore that is mined for gold, silver, zinc, copper and lead at the LaRonde Mine)mine) follow steeply dipping, east-west-trending, anastomosing shear zone structures within the Blake River Group volcanic units across the property. These shear zones are part of the larger Doyon-Dumagami Structural Zone that hosts several important gold occurrences (including the Doyon gold mine, the Westwood project and the former Bousquet mines) and has been traced for over ten kilometres within the Blake River Group, from the LaRonde Minemine westward to the Mouska gold mine.

Mineralization

The gold-bearing zones at the LaRonde Minemine are lenses of disseminated stringers through to massive, aggregates of coarse pyrite with zinc, copper and silver content. Ten zones that vary in size from 50,000 to 40,000,000 tonnes have been identified, of which four are (or are believed to be) economic. Gold content is not proportional to the total sulphide content but does increase with copper content. Gold values are also higher in areas where the pyrite lenses are crosscut by tightly spaced north-south fractures.

These historical relationships, which were noted at LaRonde Shaft #1's Main Zone, are maintained at the Penna Shaft zones. The zinc-silver (i.e.,(i.e. Zone 20 North) mineralization with lower gold values, common in the upper mine, grades into gold-copper mineralization within the lower mine. Gold value enhancement associated with crosscutting north-south fractures also occurs within the LaRonde Mine. The predominant base metal sulphides within the LaRonde Minemine are chalcopyrite (copper) and sphalerite (zinc).

The Company believes that Zone 20 North is one of the largest gold-bearing massive sulphide mineralized zones known in the world and one of the largest known mineralized zones known in the Abitibi region of Ontario and Quebec. Zone 20 North contains the majority of the mineral reserves and resources at the LaRonde Mine,mine, including 32,931,91227.3 million tonnes of proven and probable mineral reserves grading 4.394.64 grams of gold per tonne, representing 95% of the total proven and probable mineral reserves at the LaRonde 5,296,186mine, 4.4 million tonnes of indicated mineral resources grading 1.70 grams of gold per tonne, representing 76% of the total measured and indicated mineral resources at LaRonde, and 9,470,764 tonnes of inferred mineral resources grading 4.041.80 grams of gold per tonne, representing 82% of the total measured and indicated mineral resources at the LaRonde mine, and 9.6 million tonnes of inferred mineral resources grading 4.02 grams of gold per tonne, representing 81% of the total inferred mineral resources at LaRonde.

The depth of Zone 20 North extends between 700 metres below surface and at least 3,500 metres below surface, and possibly lower.remains open at depth. With increased access on the lower levels of the mine (i.e., below Level 215 and from level 215 to level 255)the internal shaft on levels 257 and 278), the transformation from a "zinc/silver" orebody to a "gold/copper" deposit is expected to continue during 2011.2013.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            29

Table of Contents


Zone 20 North can be divided into an upper zinc/silver-enriched gold-poor zone and a lower gold/copper-enriched zone. The zinc zone has been traced over a vertical distance of 1,700 metres and a horizontal distance of 570 metres, with thicknesses approaching 40 metres. The gold zone has been traced over a vertical distance of over 2,200 metres and a

32            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



horizontal distance of 900 metres, with thicknesses varying from 3three to 40 metres. The zinc zone consists of massive zinc/silver mineralization containing 50% to 90% massive pyrite and 10% to 50% massive light brown sphalerite. The gold zone mineralization consists of 30% to 70% finely disseminated to massive pyrite containing 1% to 10% chalcopyrite veinlets, minor disseminated sphalerite and rare specks of visible gold. Gold grades are generally related to the chalcopyrite or copper content. At depth, the massive sulphide lens becomes richer in gold and copper. During 2010, 2.32012, 2.0 million tonnes of ore grading 2.052.34 grams of gold per tonne, 60.043.35 grams of silver per tonne, 3.40%2.41% zinc, 0.22%0.26% copper and 0.39%0.28% lead were mined from Zone 20 North.

Exploration

The combined tonnage of proven and probable mineral reserves at the LaRonde Minemine for year-end 20102012 is 34.728.8 million tonnes, which represents a 1% increase13% decrease in the amount compared to year-end 2009 (34.42011 (33.2 million tonnes). This mineral reserve includes the replacement of 2.62.4 million tonnes of ore that were mined in 2010.2012. The Company's ability to sustain its levelreduction in reserves is principally associated with ore mined during 2012 and application of proven and probable mineral reserves was primarily due to continued successful exploration results at depth as well asa mining recovery factor of 95% on the increase in the three-year average gold price used for the year-end 2010 estimates.remaining reserves.

Diamond drilling is used for exploration on the LaRonde property. In 2010,2012, a total of 212252 holes were drilled on the LaRonde property for a total length of 19,18822,255 metres, compared to 268181 holes for a total length of 30,69916,190 metres in 2009.2011. Of the drilling in 2010, 1872012, 222 holes (7,775(10,194 metres) were for production stope delineation, 2126 holes (6,016(8,261 metres) were for definition drilling and 4 holes (5,397(3,701 metres) were for exploration. In 2009, 1402011, 165 holes (8,272(8,181 metres) were for production stope delineation, 11412 holes (17,024(2,614 metres) were for definition drilling and 144 holes (5,403(5,396 metres) were for exploration. Expenditures on diamond drilling at the LaRonde Minemine during 20102012 were approximately $2.4C$2.8 million, including $1.1C$1.6 million in definition and delineation drilling expenses charged to operating costs at the LaRonde Mine.mine. Expenditures on exploration in 20102012 were $1.3C$1.2 million, and are expected to be $2.1C$2.1 million in 2011.2013.

The main focus of the 20102012 exploration program was continuing the investigation of Zone 20 North and Zone 6-7 horizons at depth. This program was conducted from the Levellevel 215 exploration drift, approximately 2,150 metres below the surface. The first deep hole of the program was completed at the end of 2009 to a final length of 1,852 metres. This hole intersected Zone 20 North at a depth of 3,520 metres below surface, which is approximately 410 metres below the current reservesreserve envelope. The intersection returned 14.3 metres (true width) grading 3.03 grams of gold per tonne. In 2010, a second branch was drilled from this mother hole and returned 4.1 metres grading 1.77 grams of gold per tonne at a depth of 3,595 metres below surface. A second furtherAnother deep hole was initiated in 20102011 and drilling was stillintersected Zone 6 horizon in progress2012 at a depth of 3,551 meters below surface. The 22.8-meters-thick massive sulfide zone returned 1.58 grams of gold per tonne, 27.1 grams of silver per tonne, 0.38% copper and 3.36% zinc and has the endsame characteristics as other deposits on the property. A follow-up campaign is planned in 2013 from level 278 to determine the extent of the year. The drilling will continue in 2011.deposit.

In addition, definition and delineation drilling was undertaken mainly in Zonethe 20 North and Zone 20 South Zones to assist in finalfinalizing mining stope design.designs. Zone 20 North was the main focus of the definition drilling in 2010.2012. Infill drilling in 2010mainly from Level 260272 to Level 245 confirmed the previous Zone 20 North reserves with no significant gains or losses. The other focus of definition drilling in 2010 was Zone 20 South. The year-end 2009 estimates showed blocks of inferred resources in a parallel zone less than 15 metres north of Zone 20 South. As a result of 2010 drilling combined with higher gold prices, the two zones have been merged to form many mining blocks between Level 200 and Level 170. This represents a net gain of 29,200 ounces of gold (comprising 471,000 tonnes grading 1.93 grams of gold per tonne) in probable reserves in Zone 20 South.reserves.

Bousquet and Ellison Properties

The Bousquet property is located immediately west of the LaRonde Minemine and consists of two mining leases covering 80.0 hectares and 31 claims covering 384.9 hectares. The property, along with various equipment and other mining properties, was acquired from Barrick in September 2003 for $3.9$2.9 million in cash, $1.5$1.1 million in common shares of the Company and the assumption of specific reclamation and other obligations related to the Bousquet property. The property is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty interest in favour of Barrick.

From 2004 to 2007, the Company recovered 108,407 tonnes of ore grading 2.33 grams of gold per tonne from Zone 4 in a small open pit. In 2006 and 2007, the Company recovered 99,342 tonnes of ore grading 7.02 grams of gold per tonne from two small ore blocks underground at Bousquet. There has been no mining of this property since 2007.

In 2010,2011, the Company completed the first stage of a diamond drilling program consisting primarily of twinning and resampling historic holes to evaluate the production potential of an open pit at Bousquet Zone 5. This work led to a new resource estimate for Zone 5 and an initialinternal feasibility study has been conducted for a resumption of production in the Zone 5 open pit. This study led to a positive scenario. For the whole Bousquet property, including Zone 5, as at December 31, 2012, probable reserves totalled approximately 0.2 million ounces of gold comprised of 2.9 million tonnes grading 1.88 grams per tonne, as well as indicated mineral resources totalling approximately 9.8 million tonnes grading 2.44 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources totalling approximately 4.6 million tonnes grading 4.04 grams of gold per tonne.

30            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            33

Table of Contents



resource estimate for Zone 5. For the whole Bousquet property, including Zone 5, the December 31, 2010 indicated mineral resource is approximately 1.7 million tonnes grading 5.63 grams of gold per tonne. The inferred mineral resource is 20.5 million tonnes grading 2.32 grams of gold per tonne. Expenditures on exploration in 2010 were $0.2 million, which includes the cost of drilling 2,082 metres in seven holes. In 2011, the Company expects to spend $1.9 million on drilling 20,000 metres at Bousquet.

The Ellison property is located immediately west of the Bousquet property and consists of eight claims covering 101.1101.0 hectares. The property was acquired in August 2002 for C$0.5$0.32 million in cash and a commitment to spend C$0.5$0.49 million in exploration over four years. The commitment was fulfilled in 2004 and the property is 100% owned by the Company. The property is subject to a net smelter return royalty interest in favour of Yorbeau Resources Inc. that varies between 1.5% and 2.5% depending on the price of gold. Should commercial production from the Ellison property commence, the Company will be required to pay Yorbeau Resources Inc. an additional C$0.5 million in cash.

The Company began a deepExpenditures on exploration in 2012 on both the Bousquet and Ellison properties were C$1.4 million, which includes the cost of drilling program at Ellison3,850 metres in 2009 that continued throughout 2010. Late in 2010, a wedge from the original hole intercepted high grade gold mineralization approximately 2.6 kilometres below surface, interpreted to be in the Westwood horizon. This program is the first to identify the presence of significant gold mineralization in the down-dip extension of Westwood12 holes drilled on the Ellison property. The potential exists for a large gold resource with similar geologyIn 2013, the Company expects to spend C$0.84 million to continue the LaRonde Extension.optimization of the internal feasibility study completed in March 2012 regarding the Bousquet property.

The December 31, 20102012 indicated mineral resourceresources at Ellison iswere approximately 0.4 million tonnes grading 5.68 grams of gold per tonne, and the inferred resource ismineral resources were approximately 0.8 million tonnes grading 5.81 grams of gold per tonne. A follow-up exploration program, designed to trace the Westwood zone to the east and possibly define a new gold resource, is planned for Ellison in 2011, including 9,500 metres of drilling at a budget of $4.8 million.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            31

Table of Contents


Goldex Mine

The Goldex Mine, which achieved commercial production in August 2008, is located in the City of Val d'Or, Quebec, approximately 60 kilometres east of the LaRonde Mine. At December 31, 2010 the Goldex Mine was estimated to have proven and probable mineral reserves of approximately 1.6 million ounces of gold comprised of 27.8 million tonnes of ore grading 1.75 grams per tonne.

Location Map of the Goldex Mine

GRAPHIC

The Goldex Mine is accessible by provincial highway. The elevation is approximately 302 metres above sea level. All of the Goldex Mine's power requirements are supplied by Hydro-Quebec through connections to its main power transmission grid. All of the water required at the Goldex Mine is sourced directly by aqueduct from the Thompson River immediately adjacent to the minesite or through recirculation of water from the surface pond and the auxiliary tailings pond. For additional information regarding the Abitibi region in which the Goldex Mine is located, including information with respect to climate, topography, vegetation and mining personnel, see "– Property, Plant and Equipment – LaRonde Mine".

The Goldex Mine operates under a mining lease obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Quebec) and under certificates of approval granted by the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec). The Goldex property, in which the Company has a 100% working interest, consists of 20 contiguous mining claims and, since April 2006, one provincial mining lease (98.6 hectares), covering an aggregate of 273.3 hectares. The property is made up of three blocks: the Probe block (122.7 hectares); the Dalton block (10.4 hectares); and the Goldex Extension block (140.2 hectares). The claims are renewable every second year upon payment of a small fee. The mining lease expires in 2028 and is automatically renewable for three further ten-year terms upon payment of a small fee. The Company also has one lease covering 418.5 hectares of surface rights that are used for the auxiliary tailings pond. This lease is renewable annually upon payment of a small fee.

The Goldex Mine includes underground operations that can be accessed from two shafts, a processing plant, an ore storage facility and other related facilities. The Goldex Extension Zone ("GEZ"), which is the gold deposit on which the Company is currently focusing its production efforts, was discovered in 1989 on the Goldex Extension block (although the Company believes a small portion of the GEZ occurs on the Dalton and Probe blocks). Probe Mines Ltd. holds a 5% net smelter return royalty interest on the Probe block. In 2010, exploration and development work continued on the zone located on the Probe block 150 metres above the western end of the GEZ (the "M-Zone").

32            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


In late 1997, the Company completed a mining study that indicated the deposit was not economically viable to mine at the then-prevailing gold price (approximately $323 per ounce of gold) using the mining approach chosen and drill-hole-indicated grade. The property was placed on care and maintenance and the workings were allowed to flood. In February 2005, a new mineral reserve and resource estimate was completed for the GEZ which, coupled with a feasibility study, led to a probable mineral reserve estimate of 1.6 million ounces of gold contained in 20.1 million tonnes of ore grading 2.54 grams of gold per tonne. The GEZ resource model was revised and, in March 2005, the Company approved a feasibility study and the construction of the Goldex Mine. The mine achieved commercial production on August 1, 2008 and has consistently operated at or above the designed rate of 6,900 tonnes per day.

Based on the results of a scoping study completed in July 2009, the Company determined to expand the mine and mill operations at the Goldex Mine to 8,000 tonnes per day. This project was completed in 2010. Capital costs in connection with the expansion total $10 million. The crusher for the expansion was commissioned at the end of the first quarter of 2010 at a rate of 7,811 tonnes per day. Milling performance for December 2010 was at 7,951 tonnes per day. Optimization of surface crusher liners in the first quarter of 2011 is expected to improve tonnage.

The Goldex Mine produced 184,386 ounces of gold in 2010 at total cash costs of $335 per ounce. It is anticipated that the Goldex Mine will produce approximately 183,538 ounces of gold in 2011 at estimated total cash costs per ounce of approximately $349.

Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Goldex Mine

GRAPHIC

At the time the Company commenced construction of the Goldex Mine, the surface facilities included a headframe, a hoistroom, a surface building containing a mechanical shop, a warehouse and an office. In addition, the Goldex property

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            33

Table of Contents



had a 790-metre deep shaft (Shaft #1), which provided access to underground workings. Shaft #1 is predominantly used to hoist waste rock from development activities.

The sinking of a new production shaft was completed in 2007. The new shaft (Shaft #2) is a 5.5-metre diameter shaft with a 50-centimetre thick concrete lining and is used for ventilation as well as hoisting services. Shaft #2 is 865 metres deep and includes five stations. A refurbished friction hoist was installed for production and service duties, and an auxiliary hoist was installed for emergency and personnel service. The production hoist is equipped with one cage-skip. Each skip has a 21.5-tonne capacity and the shaft can hoist an average of 7,000 to 8,000 tonnes of ore per day.

Mining Method

The Goldex Mine uses a high volume bulk mining method, which is made possible through the use of large mining stopes. Drilling and blasting of 165-millimetre production holes is used to obtain a muck size large enough to be economically efficient. Using this method requires a percentage of the broken ore to be kept in the stope to reduce the backfilling cost and to reduce sloughing on the walls. Little ore and waste development is necessary to mine out the deposit.

Surface Facilities

Plant construction at the Goldex Mine commenced in the second quarter of 2006 and was completed in the first quarter of 2008. The plant reached design capacity in the second quarter of 2009. Grinding at the Goldex mill is done through a two-stage circuit comprised of a SAG mill and a ball mill. As part of the expansion project commenced in 2009, a surface crusher was added to reduce the size of ore transferred to the surface from 150 millimetres to 50 millimetres. A lamellar decanter was also added to recover small particles present in the water overflow of the concentrate thickener. The underflow pump of this thickener was upgraded following flotation circuit modification to increase the pull rate of the small particles. An increase in the capacity of the tailings pump is required. The project is ongoing and the Company expects that it will be finalized in March 2011. A lime silo will also be installed and commissioned in the second quarter of 2011. Approximately two-thirds of the gold is recovered through a gravity circuit, passed over shaking tables and smelted on site. The remainder of the gold and pyrite is recovered by a flotation process. The concentrate is then thickened and trucked to the mill at the LaRonde Mine where it is further treated by cyanidation. Gold recovered is consolidated with precious metals from the LaRonde and Lapa Mines. The Company is targeting an average gold recovery of 93.28% for 2011.

In addition, surface facilities at the Goldex Mine include an electrical sub-station, a compressor building, a service building for administration and changing rooms, a warehouse building, a concrete headframe above Shaft #2, a hazardous waste storage facility and a dome covering the ore stockpile. In 2008, the processing plant building was commissioned along with the Manitou pumping station and its associated 24-kilometre pipeline.

Mineral Recoveries

During 2010, the Goldex mill processed approximately 2.78 million tonnes of ore, averaging approximately 7,620 tonnes of ore treated per day and operating at approximately 95% of available time. The following table sets out the metal recoveries at the Goldex Mine in 2010.

 Head
Grades
 Gravity Recovery Flotation-Cyanidation
Recovery
 Global Recovery Payable
Production

Gold2.21 g/t 123,712 oz63.24% 60,673 oz29.98% 184,385 oz93.22% 184,385 oz

Environmental Matters

Environmental permits for the construction and operation of an ore extracting infrastructure at the Goldex Mine were received from the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec) in October 2005. The permits also covered the construction and operation of a sedimentation pond for mine water treatment and sewage facilities, and these facilities have been built at the Goldex Mine site. In June 2009, permits were revised to permit the expansion of the mine and mill operations to 8,500 tonnes per day.

In November 2006, the Company and the Quebec government signed an agreement permitting the Company to dispose of the Goldex tailings at the Manitou minesite, a tailings site formerly used by an unrelated third party and abandoned to the Quebec government. The Manitou tailings site has issues relating to acid drainage and the construction of tailings facilities by the Company and the deposit of tailings from the Goldex plant on the Manitou tailings site was accepted by the

34            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec) as a valid rehabilitation plan to address the acid generation problem at Manitou. Under the agreement, the Company managed the construction and operation of the tailings facilities and the Quebec government paid all additional costs above the Company's budget for tailings facilities set out in the Goldex feasibility study. The Quebec government retains responsibility for all environmental contamination at the Manitou tailings site and for final closure of the facilities. In addition, the Company has built a separate tailings deposit area (auxiliary tailings pond) near the Goldex Mine. Environmental permits for the construction and operation of the auxiliary tailings pond at the Goldex Mine were received in March 2007. In 2010, 33,947 tonnes of Goldex tailings were discharged to the auxiliary pond for a total to date of 526,000 tonnes. At the Manitou site, 2.75 million tonnes of Goldex tailings were discharged for a total to date of 5.893 million tonnes.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures at the Goldex Mine in 2010 were approximately $24.3 million, which included $3.2 million on sustaining capital expenditures, $3.4 million on the construction of facilities in the M-Zone and water management, $11.7 million in deferred development expenses and $2.9 million for other projects. Sustaining capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $9.9 million in 2011 and $16.4 million over the period from 2011 through 2015.

Development

During 2010, approximately 3,800 metres of lateral and vertical development were completed at a cost of $8.2 million. For 2011, 4,000 metres of development is planned with a budget of approximately $10.7 million (including $9.7 million for deferred development). In 2010, ramp access from Level 49 to Level 37 was completed.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

Geologically, the Goldex property is similar to the LaRonde property and is located near the southern boundary of the Archean-age (2.7 billion years old) Abitibi Subprovince, a typical granite-greenstone terrane located within the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. The southern contact of the Abitibi Subprovince with the Pontiac Subprovince is marked by the east-southeast trending CLL Fault Zone, the most important regional structural feature. The Goldex deposit is hosted within a quartz diorite sill, the "Goldex Granodiorite", located in a succession of mafic to ultramafic volcanic rocks that are all generally oriented west-northwest.

The GEZ, which hosts most of the current mineral reserves, extends from 500 to 800 metres below the surface and is entirely hosted by the Goldex Granodiorite. The limits of the zone are defined by the intensity of the quartz vein stockwork envelope and by gold assays. The zone is almost egg-shaped; it is over 300 metres tall by 450 metres long (in a west-northwest direction) and its thickness increases rapidly from 25 metres along the east-west edges to almost 150 metres in the centre.

Exploration efforts at Goldex were focused on satellite zones in 2010. Some of these satellite zones now contain reserves, including the M-Zone and the zone located at the south-eastern extension of the GEZ (the "E-Zone"). Both the M-Zone and the E-Zone are defined by quartz tourmaline veins and gold assays that are similar to the GEZ. The M-Zone has been defined on a length of 160 metres, a height of 120 metres and a thickness of 115 metres. The E-Zone has been defined on a length of 150 metres, a height of 110 metres and a thickness of 90 metres.

Mineralization

Gold mineralization at Goldex corresponds to the quartz-tourmaline vein deposit type. The Goldex gold-bearing quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins and veinlets have strong structural control. The most significant structure directly related to mineralization is a discrete shear zone, the Goldex Mylonite, that is up to five metres wide and occurs within the Goldex Granodiorite, just south of the GEZ and most other gold occurrences. The quartz-tourmaline-pyrite vein mineralization is controlled by minor fracture zones that are oriented west-northwest and dip steeply north or south. The fractures are parallel to but north of the Goldex Mylonite. Within the GEZ are three vein sets, the most important of which are extensional-shear veins dipping 30 degrees south and usually less than 10 centimetres thick. The vein sets and associated alteration combine to form stacked envelopes up to 30 metres thick.

Strong albite-sericite alteration of the host-rock quartz diorite surrounds the quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins and covers almost 80% of the mineralized zone; outside of the envelopes, prior chlorite alteration affects the quartz diorite and gives it a darker grey-green colour. Occasionally, enclaves of relatively unaltered medium grey-green-coloured quartz diorite (with

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            35

Table of Contents



no veining or gold) are found within the GEZ; they are included exceptionally as internal waste to allow for a smooth shape, required for mining purposes.

Most of the gold occurs as microscopic particles that are almost always associated with pyrite, generally adjacent to grains and crystals but also 20% included within the pyrite. The gold-bearing pyrite occurs in the quartz-tourmaline veins and in narrow fractures in the sericite-albite-altered quartz diorite (generally immediately adjacent to the veins). Less than 1.5% of the gold occurs as the mineral calaverite, a gold telluride.

Exploration

In 2010, $3.9 million was spent on exploration at Goldex. A total of 122 holes were drilled using diamond drilling methods at the Goldex Mine for a total length of approximately 44 kilometres, compared to 52 holes for a total length of 8,917 metres in 2009. Initiated in 2009, the exploration drift on Level 84 was extended by 60 metres in 2010. Four different zones in the Goldex Granodiorite intrusive were drilled in 2010. The focus of the 11.7 kilometres of exploration drilling was the area above the M-Zone, with additional drilling on the eastern and western ends of the GEZ and above the E-Zone. In addition, approximately 11 kilometres of drilling was undertaken for resource-to-reserve conversion in the E-Zone and 21 kilometres to delineate a new inferred resource in the zone located inside the Goldex Granodiorite sill and extending approximately 325 metres high, 490 metres wide and 100 metres deep (the "D-Zone"). Like the GEZ, mineralization in the D-Zone is characterized by quartz tourmaline veins.

The 2011 exploration program is budgeted to include 58,200 metres of diamond drilling. The primary target is the D-Zone with 40,700 metres of diamond drilling. The remainder of drilling will explore the area above the M-Zone (9,000 metres) and the sector to the east of the GEZ above the E-Zone (8,500 metres).

Kittila Mine

The Kittila Mine, which commenced commercial production in May 2009, is located approximately 900 kilometres north of Helsinki and 50 kilometres northeast of the town of Kittila in northern Finland. At December 31, 2010, the Kittila Mine was estimated to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 9 million ounces of gold comprised of 32.7 million tonnes of ore grading 4.64 grams per tonne. The Kittila Mine is accessible by paved road from the village of Kiistala, which is located on the southern portion of the main claim block. The gold deposit is located near the small village of Rouravaara, approximately ten kilometres north of the village of Kiistala, accessible via a paved road. The property is close to infrastructure, including hydro power, an airport and the town of Kittila. The project also has access to a qualified labour force, including mining and construction contractors.

The total landholdings surrounding and including the Kittila Mine comprise one mining licence covering an area of approximately 847 hectares, 129 individual tenements (valid claims) covering approximately 11,507 hectares and 227 claim applications covering approximately 20,207 hectares. The mineral titles form a continuous block around the Kittila mining licence. The block has been divided into the Suurikuusikko area, the Suurikuusikko West area and the Kittila mining licence centred at 25.4110 degrees longitude east and 67.9683 degrees latitude north.

The boundary of the mining licence is determined by ground-surveyed points whereas the boundaries of the other tenements are not required to be surveyed. All of the tenements in the Kittila Mine are registered in the name of Agnico-Eagle Finland Oy, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. According to the Finnish government's land tenure records, all tenements are in good standing. The expiry dates of the tenements vary from November 2011 up to June 2015. Tenements are valid between three and five years, provided a small annual fee is paid to maintain title, and extensions can be granted for three years or more. Agnico-Eagle Finland Oy also holds the mining licence in respect of the Kittila Mine. The mine is subject to a 2.0% net smelter return royalty payable to the Republic of Finland starting in 2011.

The Kittila Mine area is sparsely populated and is situated between 200 and 245 metres above sea level. The topography is characterized by low rolling forested hills separated by marshes, lakes and interconnected rivers. The gold deposit is situated on an area of land that has no special use at present and there is sufficient land available for tailings facilities. Water requirements for the Kittila Mine are sourced from the nearby Seurujoki River, recirculation of water from pit dewatering and tailings pond water. The Kittila region is located within the South-West Lapland zone of the northern boreal vegetation zone characterized by spruce forests, marshes and bogs.

36            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The mine is located within the Arctic Circle but the climate is moderated by the Gulf Stream off the coast of Norway such that northern Finland's climate is comparable to that of eastern Canada. Winter temperatures range from -10 to -30 degrees Celsius, whereas summer temperatures range from 10 degrees Celsius to the mid-20s. Exploration and mining work can be carried out year-round. Because of its northern latitude, winter days are extremely short with a brief period of 24-hour darkness around the winter solstice. Conversely, summer days are very long with a brief period of 24-hour daylight in early summer around the summer solstice. Annual precipitation varies between five and 50 centimetres, one-third of which falls as snow. Snow accumulation usually begins in November and remains until March or April.

Location Map of the Kittila Mine

GRAPHIC

The Company acquired its 100%, indirect interest in the Kittila Mine through the acquisition of Riddarhyttan completed in November 2005. See "– History and Development of the Company". In June 2006, on the basis of an independently reviewed feasibility study, the Company approved construction of the Kittila Mine. The Kittila Mine is currently an open pit mining operation with underground mining via ramp access expected to be gradually phased in over three years. The initial underground stope was mined in early 2010. Ore is processed in a 3,000-tonne per day surface processing plant that was commissioned in late 2008. Limited gold concentrate production started in September 2008 and gold dore bar production commenced in January 2009. During 2010 throughput at the Kittila Mine approached design levels and gold recoveries continuted to improve. The Kittila Mine is anticipated to produce approximately 149,000 ounces of gold in 2011 at estimated total cash costs per ounce of approximately $548. Over the period of 2011 to 2023, total average gold production of approximately 150,000 ounces annually is anticipated. A scoping study is underway to assess the feasibility of significantly increasing the annual gold production. This could involve sinking a new shaft and expanding the Kittila mill.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            37

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Kittila Mine

GRAPHIC

The orebodies at Kittila are being mined initially from two open pits, followed by underground operations to mine the deposits at depth. Additional, smaller open pits will be used to mine any remaining mineral reserves close to the surface in the future. Open pit mining started in May 2008 and the extracted ore was stockpiled. As of December 2010, a total of 1.8 million tonnes of ore have been processed, 0.4 million tonnes of ore have been stockpiled and 25.8 million tonnes of waste rock have been excavated. Work on the ramp to access the underground reserves continued throughout 2010 and total underground development to date is approximately 14,500 metres. Underground mining commenced in the fourth quarter of 2010 and, as of December 2010, a total of 100,559 tonnes of ore have been mined from the underground portions of the mine.

Mining Methods

The Kittila Mine currently mines the Suurikuusikko orebody with a 160-metre deep open pit. Ore is mined in 7.5-metre benches together with waste rock using buffer blasting techniques and is loaded selectively to minimize dilution and maximize ore recovery. Hydraulic excavators load ore into 100-tonne trucks that haul the ore to the crusher and the waste

38            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



rock to the waste disposal area. Approximately 3,000 tonnes of ore per day are fed to the concentrator. Surface mining is expected to continue through 2013, during which time the ramp access to the underground mine will continue to be developed. Underground development continued throughout the year and the first underground test stopes were mined in the first and second quarters of 2010.

The underground mining method is open stoping with delayed backfill. Stopes are between 25 and 40 metres high and yield approximately 10,000 tonnes of ore per stope. To ensure sufficient ore production is available to supply the mill, approximately 5,000 metres of tunnels will be developed each year. After extraction, stopes will be filled with cemented backfill or paste fill to enable the safe extraction of ore in adjacent stopes. Ore will be trucked to the surface crusher via the ramp access system.

Surface Facilities

Construction of the processing plant and associated equipment was completed in 2008 and facilities on site include an office building, a maintenance facility for the open pit equipment, a warehouse, a maintenance shop, an oxygen plant, a processing plant, a tank farm, a crusher, conveyor housings and an ore bin. In addition, some temporary structures house contractor offices and work areas.

The ore at Kittila is treated by grinding, flotation, pressure oxidation and carbon-in-leach circuits. Gold is recovered from the carbon in a Zadra elution circuit and is recovered from the solution using electrowinning and then poured into dore bars using an electric induction furnace.

Mineral Recoveries

In 2010, the Kittila mill processed 960,365 tonnes of ore with an availability of 82.5% for an average throughput of 3,189 tonnes per day. Low mill availability was caused by maintenance issues associated with the autoclave and scrubber, mainly related to leaking mechanical seals, brick lining failures in the autoclave and blocked pipelines on the scrubber.

The following table sets out the gold production at the Kittila Mine in 2010:

Head
Grade
Dore
Produced
Overall
Metal
Recovery
Payable
Production

Gold5.41 g/t126,028 oz75.50%126,205 oz

Flotation recoveries were stable during 2010 and flotation recovery averaged 91.87% during the year. Trials are still in progress with the aim to further increase the flotation recovery. An in-house metallurgical laboratory to be built in 2011 will allow further flotation test work to be undertaken to attempt to optimize flotation recoveries in 2011.

Ore processing at Kittila consists of two stages. In the first stage, ore is enriched by flotation and in the second stage the gold is extracted by pressure oxidation and cyanide-in-leach processes.

The first half of the year was a challenge for the second stage of the ore processing and the global recoveries (that is, the combination of recoveries from flotation and CIL) averaged 69.4%. The poor recovery rates were attributable to the formation of gold-chloride compound in the autoclave, which was successfully reduced in the last half of the year and, as a result, the global recovery increased to an average of 81.4%. Modifications inside the autoclave allowed for better oxygen distribution management, which resulted in better sludge flow and oxidation within the autoclave, leading to better recoveries. Also, further optimizing and improved control of the process enabled continuous improvement in recoveries.

A large amount of test work was done in 2010 and the testing and optimization of the process will continue in 2011. Large-scale test-work is ongoing to find optimized pressure oxidation and results are expected in 2011.

Environmental Matters

The Company currently holds a mining licence, an environmental permit and operational permits in respect of the Kittila Mine. All permits necessary to begin production were received during 2008, including an environmental permit update to change from a biological oxidation process to a pressure oxidation process and to change the slopes of the waste rock pile to decrease the footprint.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            39

Table of Contents


The construction of the first phase of the tailings dam and waterproof bottom layer was completed in the fall of 2008. This first phase is sufficient to hold tailings from three years of production. Work began on the second phase in 2009. Water from dewatering the mine and water used in the mine and mill is collected and treated by sedimentation. Emissions and environmental impact are monitored in accordance with the comprehensive monitoring program that has been approved by the Finnish environmental authorities. There are no material environmental liabilities related to the Kittila Mine. A permit to increase mine process water discharge limits was granted in 2010.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures at the Kittila Mine during 2010 were approximately $72 million, which included mill modification costs, underground mine development costs, exploration and conversion drilling costs within the mining licence area and sustaining capital costs. The Company expects capital expenditures at the Kittila Mine in 2011 to be approximately $68 million, most of which will be used for mining equipment for underground mining, development and construction of underground mining infrastructure, construction of a paste backfill plant and exploration and conversion drilling.

Development

Mining at the Suurikuusikko and Roura open pits progressed throughout 2010 with a total of 1,113,000 tonnes of ore and nine million tonnes of waste mined from the open pit. The Company expects that 750,000 tonnes of ore and 4.7 million tonnes of waste will be mined from the Suurikuusikko and Roura pits during 2011. Total costs for open pit development in 2010 were $23.2 million.

In 2010, underground development progressed in both the Rouravaara and Suurikuusikko zones with 5,047 metres of ramp and sublevel access development completed during the year. The first test stope was mined near the end of 2009. A total of 39,176 tonnes of ore from development and 61,383 tonnes of stope ore were mined in 2010. The Company expects to complete 6,000 metres of lateral development and 680 metres of vertical development during 2011.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The Kittila Mine is situated within the Kittila Greenstone belt, part of the Lapland Greenstone belt in the Proterozoic-age Svecofennian geologic province. The appearance and geology of the area is similar to that of the Abitibi region of the Canadian Shield. In northern Finland, the bedrock is typically covered by a thin but uniform blanket of unconsolidated glacial till. Bedrock exposures are scarce and irregularly distributed.

The mine area is underlain by mafic volcanic and sedimentary rocks metamorphosed to greenschist assemblages and assigned to the Kittila group. The major rock units trend north to north-northeast and are near-vertical. The volcanics are further sub-divided into iron-rich tholeiitic basalts (Kautoselka Formation) located to the west and magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalt, coarse volcaniclastic units, graphitic schist and minor chemical sedimentary rocks (Vesmajarvi Formation) located to the east. The contact between these two rock units consists of a transitional zone (the Porkonen Formation) varying between 50 and 200 metres in thickness. This zone is strongly sheared, brecciated and characterized by intense hydrothermal alteration and gold mineralization, features consistent with major brittle-ductile deformation zones. It includes the north-northeast-oriented Suurikuusikko Trend.

Mineralization

The Porkonen Formation hosts the Kittila gold deposit, which contains multiple mineralized zones stretching over a strike length of more than 25 kilometres. Most of the work has been focused on the 4.5-kilometre stretch that hosts the known gold reserves and resources. From north to south, the zones are Rimminvuoma ("Rimpi-S"), North Rouravaara ("Roura-N"), Central Rouravaara ("Roura-C"), depth extension of Rouravaara and Suurikuusikko ("Suuri/Roura Deep"), Suurikuusikko ("Suuri"), Etela and Ketola. The Suuri and Suuri/Roura Deep zones include several parallel sub-zones that have previously been referred to as Main East, Main Central and Main West. The Suuri zone hosts approximately 38% of the current probable gold reserve estimate on a contained-gold basis, while Suuri/Roura Deep has approximately 20%, Roura-C approximately 12%, Roura Deep approximately 20%, Roura-N approximately 3%, Rimpi-S approximately 4%, Ketola approximately 1% and Etela approximately 0.2%.

Gold mineralization in these zones is associated with intense hydrothermal alteration (carbonate-albite-sulphide), and is almost exclusively refractory, locked inside fine-grained sulphide minerals: arsenopyrite (approximately 73%) or pyrite (approximately 23%). The rest is "free gold", which is manifested as extremely small grains of gold in pyrite.

40            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Exploration

In 1986, the discovery of coarse visible gold in quartz-carbonate veining along a road cut near the village of Kiistala alerted the Geological Survey of Finland ("GTK") to the gold exploration potential of the area. Following this discovery, GTK initiated regional exploration over the area and deployed a wide range of indirect exploration tools to explore this relatively unexplored area. Over the period from 1987 to 2005, GTK and later Riddarhyttan undertook drilling programs and other testing on the property. After it acquired the property in 1998, Riddarhyttan continued to investigate the metallurgical properties of the refractory gold mineralization with the objective of demonstrating its recoverability and assessing suitable processing scenarios and initiated engineering and environmental studies to assess the feasibility of a mining project.

Diamond drilling is used for exploration on the Kittila property. Most of the work on the mining licence area has focused on the Suuri and Roura zones. Up to the end of December 2010, a total of 1,870 drill holes, totalling 557,397 metres, have been completed on the property. In 2010, between nine and 12 drill machines worked on the Kittila property: two to three drills on underground infill drilling; six to ten drills on mine exploration; and two to three drills on resource-to-reserve conversion drilling. A total of 501 holes were completed for a length of 134,596 metres. Of these drill holes, 329 drill holes (35,784 metres) were for definition drilling, 63 drill holes (34,413 metres) were for conversion drilling and 109 drill holes (61,399 metres) were related to mine exploration. Total expenditures for diamond drilling in 2010 were $27.7 million, including $5.2 million for definition and delineation drilling.

Exploration during 2010 increased proven and probable gold reserves to 4.9 million ounces (32.7 million tonnes of ore grading 4.64 grams per tonne). Most of the increase came from the Roura Deep zone (901,272 ounces) and the Suuri Deep zone (190,928 ounces). Indicated mineral resources decreased by 5.2 million tonnes to 15.3 million tonnes of ore grading 2.4 grams per tonne. Inferred mineral resources increased by 3.0 million tonnes to 8.3 million tonnes of ore grading 2.5 grams per tonne. The decrease of indicated mineral resources reflected the successful conversion of resources to reserves, especially in the Suuri Deep and Roura Deep zones.

The successful deep drilling program in 2010 at the Roura Deep zone, which is located immediately below the Roura zone and north of the Suuri Deep zone, has confirmed that most of the Roura ore lenses are present in the Roura Deep zone and most of the ore lenses in the Suuri Deep zone continue north to the Roura Deep zone. The gold mineralization is open at depth and to the north, and these areas will be further tested in 2012.

An extensive resource-to-reserve conversion drilling campaign was carried out at Suuri, Roura and Roura-N in 2010. As a result of this work, probable reserves increased by 106,343 ounces from Roura and Roura-N, but drilling at Suuri did not increase reserves significantly. Roura North and Rimpi-S will be the main targets for resource-to-reserve conversion drilling in 2011.

Outside of the Kittila mining licence area, systematic geochemical sampling and diamond drilling continued on targets along the Suurikuusikko Trend, and a number of new targets were tested by diamond drilling. Encouraging results were received from a new gold zone in the Kuotko area located approximately ten kilometres north of the mine construction site as well as from the Hako area located one kilometre north of the mining licence area. A total of 242 diamond drill holes totalling 54,033 metres have been drilled on exploration targets outside of the mining licence area from 2006 to 2010.

The 2011 exploration budget for the Kittila Mine is approximately $17.3 million ($11.0 million for minesite exploration, $3.2 million for resource-to-reserve conversion and $3.0 million for construction of an exploration ramp at the 600-metre mine level between 500 and 600 metres below the surface), and includes over 66,000 metres in diamond drilling (34,200 metres for minesite exploration and 22,000 metres for resource-to-reserve conversion), using up to seven drills throughout the year to help further identify the gold reserve and resource potential of the Kittila property. In addition, $1.2 million of exploration expenditures, including an estimated 10,000 metres of diamond drilling, is planned for exploration along the 25-kilometre Suurikuusikko Trend.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            41

Table of Contents


Lapa Mine

The Lapa Mine,mine, which achieved commercial production in May 2009, is located approximately 11 kilometres east of the LaRonde Minemine near Cadillac, Quebec. At December 31, 2010,2012, the Lapa Minemine was estimated to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 0.70.4 million ounces of gold comprised of 2.82 million tonnes of ore grading 7.46.0 grams per tonne. The Lapa property is made up of the Tonawanda property, which consists of 4344 contiguous mining claims and one provincial mining lease covering an aggregate of 702.4 hectares, and the Zulapa property, which consists of one mining concession of 93.5 hectares. The mining lease at Lapa expires in 2029.

Location Map of the Lapa Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

The Company's initial interest in the Lapa property was acquired in 2002 through an option agreement with Breakwater Resources Ltd. ("Breakwater"). The Company undertook an aggressive exploration program and discovered a new gold deposit almost 300 metres below the surface. In 2003, the Company purchased the Lapa property from Breakwater for a payment of $8.9 million, a 1% net smelter return royalty on the Tonawanda property and a 0.5% net smelter return royalty on the Zulapa property. In 2008, the Company purchased all royalties from Breakwater for C$6.35 million. In addition, both the Zulapa and Tonawanda properties are subject to a 5% net profit royalty payable to Alfer Inc. and René Amyot. In

34            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



2004, an additional claim of 9.4 hectares was added to the Company's holdings at the Lapa Mine.mine. In January 2009, a mining lease covering 66.8 hectares was entered into with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife (Quebec).

The Lapa Minemine is accessible by provincial highway. The elevation varies between approximately 320 and 390 metres above sea level. All of the Lapa Mine'smine's power requirements are supplied by Hydro-Quebec through connections to its main power transmission grid. All of the water required at the Lapa Minemine is sourced from the Heva river located 3.5 kilometres to the south of the mine. The water is pumped into an existing open pit nearby the property that has been allowed to flood and from which the mine is supplied. The topography slopes relatively gently from north to south. The property is generally covered by a boreal-type forest consisting mainly of black spruce and white pine with minor amounts of birch and poplar.

For additional information regarding the Abitibi region in which the Lapa Minemine is located, see "– Property, Plant and Equipment – LaRonde Mine".

Gold production during 20112013 at the Lapa Minemine is expected to be approximately 125,000105,000 ounces at estimated total cash costs per ounce of approximately $518.$787.

42            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Lapa Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

The Lapa site hosts an underground mining operation and the ore is trucked to the processing facility at the LaRonde Mine,mine, which has been modified to treat the ore, recover the gold and store the residues. Tailings from the Lapa Minemine are deposited in the tailings pond at the LaRonde Mine.mine.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            35

Table of Contents


In July 2004, the Company initiated the sinking of an 825-metre deep shaft at the Lapa property. In April 2006, 2,800 tonnes of development ore development was extracted at Lapa and was estimated to contain on average 10.65 grams of gold per tonne. These results and results from other sampling methods were incorporated into a feasibility study and in June 2006, the Company accelerated construction of the Lapa Mine.mine. This construction included extending the shaft to a depth of 1,369 metres, which was completed in October��October 2007. Significant additional construction was required in order for the Lapa Minemine to achieve commercial production in May 2009, including the construction of the mill.

Mining Methods

Two underground mining methods are used at the Lapa Mine:mine: longitudinal retreat with cemented backfill and locally transverse open stoping with cemented backfill. Sublevels are driven at 30-metre vertical intervals. Stopes are mined in 12-metre sections and backfilled with 100% cemented rock fill.backfill. Excavated ore from the Lapa site is trucked via provincial highway to the processing facility at the LaRonde Mine.mine.

Surface Facilities

The infrastructure on the Lapa property includes the refurbished former LaRonde Shaft #1 headframe and shafthouse, service buildings, temporary offices, a settling pond for waste water, dry facilities, an ore bin, a diesel reservoir and a cementwater treatment plant. In November 2007, lateral development began on three horizons. A backfill plant was commissioned in December 2008 and the sedimentation pond was extended in 2007 to control suspended solids from underground dewatering discharge.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            43

Table of Contents


Ore at the Lapa Minemine is processed through grinding, gravity and leaching circuits. Dedicated milling facilities have been integrated into the mill at the LaRonde Mine.mine. Based on an average ore head grade of 8.306.49 grams per tonne, gold recovery averaged 79.94%79.7% in 2010. During2012. With an average production of 1,750 tonnes per day in 2012, the fourth quartermine operated consistently above its design rate of 2010, recovery1,500 tonnes per day. Dilution averaged 82.68% after modifications to the gravity circuit64% in 2010 and is expected to be at the target of 83.0% in 2011. In addition, the Company is attempting to reduce the mining dilution caused by weaker than expected rock conditions in the south wall, which is mainly composed of talc chlorite schist.2012, a significant improvement over previous years.

Mineral Recoveries

In 2010,2012, the Lapa Minemine produced 571,279640,832 tonnes of ore grading 8.266.49 grams of gold per tonne and 19,540 tonnes of ore were added to the stockpile.tonne. The Lapa processing facility treated 551,739640,305 tonnes of ore in 20102012 (approximately 1,5121,749 tonnes per day) and operated at about 96.5%97.6% of available time.

  
  Head
Grades
 Gold in
Dore
Produced
Overall
Metal
Recoveries
 Payable
Production
  
Gold 8.306.49 g/t 117,45679.7%106,191 oz 79.94%117,456 oz

Environmental Matters

Water used underground at the Lapa Minemine was initially re-circulated from mine dewatering after settling in the sedimentation pond. The re-circulation led to ammonia contentconcentration in the water, and the Company experienced occasional toxicity problems in the water pond in 2008 and 2009. To address the ammonia content in the water, the Company built a 3.5-kilometre pipeline to obtain fresh water from the Heva River. The pipeline was commissioned in November 2009. The Company also commissioned a water treatment plant on site in 2010, which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2010 to reduce the ammonia from mine dewatering. Output is currently within the target range at approximately teneight parts per million of ammonia and average efficiency is at approximately 70%. Optimization of the plant is ongoing.

In the second quarter of 2012, an Oberlin filtration unit located inside the treatment plant was installed to improve the removal of suspended solids from water coming from the underground operation. A sedimentation pond also is used to remove suspended solids from the dewatering water before either release to the environment or re-use in the underground mining operation. The waste rock pile naturally drains towards the sedimentation pond. A waste rock sampling program implemented during the shaft sinking phase verified the non-acid generating nature of the waste rock. Water effluent from the sedimentation pond is being sampled as required under the Quebec mining effluent guidelines, and is expected to comply with the water quality criteria. The mill residues will be sent to the LaRonde mine tailings area.

36            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


There are no known environmental liabilities associated with the Lapa site. The Certificates of Authorization to proceed with mine production and with mill construction were issued by the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec) in October and December 2007, respectively. The Certificate of Authorization for mill and tailings production was received in 2008.

Capital Expenditures

The Company incurred approximately $33$18.4 million in capital expenditures at the Lapa Minemine in 20102012 and expects to incur approximately $18.2$20.7 million in 2011 of which $8.42013, including $13.7 million relates tofor deferred development, $4.1$5.4 million tofor sustaining capital expenditures (including underground construction and mining equipment) and $5.7$1.6 million for exploration.

Development

In 2010,2012, a total of 7,7656,062 metres of lateral development was completed. Development focused on permanent drifts (ramps and haulage way) and, stope preparation of mining blocks set for production in 20102012 and 2011. Development work was done on three separate horizons: Level 77, Level 1012013 and Level 125.access to the East zone and the Deep Project, which is expected to begin production in 2013.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The Lapa property is geologically similar to the LaRonde property and is also located near the southern boundary of the Archean-age (2.7 billion years old) Abitibi Subprovince and the Pontiac Subprovince within the Superior Province of the

44            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Canadian Shield. The most important regional structure is the CLL fault zone marking the contact between the Abitibi and Pontiac Subprovinces. The fault zone passes through the property from west to east, and is marked by schists and mafic to ultramafic volcanic flows that comprise the Piché group (up to approximately 300 metres thick in the mine area). On the Lapa property, the fault zone displays a "Z" shaped fold to which all of the lithologic groups in the region conform. Feldspathic dykes cut the Piché group, especially near the fold. North of the Piché group lies the Cadillac sedimentary group, which consists of 500 metres or more of well-banded wacke, conglomerate and siltstone with intercalations of iron formation. The Pontiac group sedimentary rocks (up to approximately 300 metres thick) that occur to the south of the Piché group are similar to the Cadillac group but do not contain conglomerate nor iron formation.

Mineralization

All of the known gold mineralization along the CLL fault zone is epigenetic (late) vein type, controlled by the structure. The mineralization is associated with the fault zone and occurs within or immediately adjacent to the Piché group rocks.

The Lapa deposit is comprised of the Contact zone and five satellite zones. The Contact zone accounts for approximately 85%84% of the mineral reserves.

The ore zones are made up of multiple quartz veins and veinlets, often smoky and anastomosing, within a sheared and altered envelope containing minor sulphides and visible gold. The Contact zone is generally located at the contact between the Piché group and the Cadillac group. The satellite zones are located within the Piché group at a distance varying from ten to 50 metres from the contact with the Cadillac group, except for the Contact North zone, which is located approximately ten metres north of the Contact zone within the Cadillac group. The sheared envelope consists of millimetre-thick foliation bands of biotite or sericite with silica and, in places, cuts across rock units. Quartz veins and millimetre-sized veinlets parallel to the foliation account for 5% to 25% of the mineralization. Visible gold is common in the veins and veinlets but can also be found in the altered host rock. Sulphides account for 1% to 3% of the mineralization; the most common sulphides, in order of decreasing importance, are arsenopyrite, pyrite, pyrrhotite and stibnite. Graphite is also rarely observed as inclusions in smoky quartz veins.

The Contact and satellite zones are tabular mineralized envelopes oriented east-west and dipping very steeply to the north, turning south at depth. The economic portion of the zone has been traced from depths of approximately 450 metres to more than 1,300 metres below surface. The Contact zone has an average strike length of 300 metres, varies in thickness from 2.8 to 5.0 metres and is open at depth. Locally some thicker intervals have been intersected but their continuity has not been demonstrated. The satellite zones have thicknesses similar to the Contact zone.

Exploration

DiamondTwo exploration diamond drilling in 2010programs were completed at the Lapa mine during 2012. The first program concentrated on confirming and expanding the known orebodies (Contact(in the Contact zone and the other satellite zones) in the immediate

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            37

Table of Contents



vicinity of the ore zones. The exploration program at the Lapa Mine in 2010 primarilydrilling tested the eastern area of the Contact zone reserve at roughlyfrom 1,000 metres to 1,500 metres depth below the surface and 300 metres east of the Contact zone reserve limit. Good results, including visible gold, were returned and additional resources were identified. The 20112013 program will focus on expanding mineral resources in this area. Additional drilling was done below Level 128 (the deepest producing level) targeting the Zulapa corridor, which returned good results and allowed for the identification of new resources. Further drilling will be need to be completed in 2013 to evaluate the economics of this area. The second program was executed from the exploration track drift on Level 101 (one kilometre deep) toward the east and from the newly excavated west exploration track drift on Level 101. This program will continue through 2013.

Overall, there was a reduction of approximately 167,000106,000 ounces of gold in reserves at Lapa from 2009 to 2010in 2012 after mining 150,000129,000 ounces of gold. The net reduction of 17,000106,000 ounces in reserves was a result of a lower-than-expected grade from 20102012 delineation diamond drilling and a decrease in the lower portion ofmining recovery factor for sill stopes, offset by additional ounces from the mine.deep drilling project. Mineral underground resources at the Lapa Mine remained mostly unchanged. Thesemine decreased by 0.8 million tonnes (decrease of 0.4 million tonnes due to conversion of resources below Level 128 of the Contact zone and below Level 113 of the East zone and decrease of 0.4 million tonnes following the re-interpretation of drilling results are incorporatedand new drilling on the Lapa property). Approximately 0.2 million tonnes of inferred resources were added following underground drilling in the December 31, 2010 mineral reserve2012. Drilling and resource estimates.evaluation will continue in 2013.

In 2010,2012, a total of 264234 holes were drilled on the Lapa property for a total length of 25,66037,699 metres, compared to 353231 holes for a total length of 24,94528,386 metres in 2009.2011. Of the drilling in 2010, 2072012, 177 holes (13,263(11,026 metres) were for production stope delineation 8and 57 holes (1,477 metres) were for definition drilling and 49 holes (10,920(26,672 metres) were for exploration. In 2009, 3222011, 165 holes (19,248(9,257 metres) were for production stope delineation, 7and 66 holes (1,451(19,129 metres) were for definition drilling and 24 holes (4,247 metres) were for deep exploration. Expenditure on diamond drilling at the Lapa Minemine during 20102012 was approximately $2.0$3.0 million, including $1.27$0.9 million in definition and delineation drilling expenses charged to operating costs.

In 2011,2013, the Company expects to spend $5.7$2.6 million on exploration, including $3.6 million on the excavation of a track drift toward the east.exploration. In 2011, 34%2013, 61% of the exploration drilling budget will be used for exploration in close vicinity of the mine infrastructure and 66%39% will be used for drilling from the exploration drift.

2010Goldex Mine Project

The Goldex mine project, which achieved commercial production in August 2008, is located in the City of Val d'Or, Quebec, approximately 60 kilometres east of the LaRonde mine. On October 19, 2011, the Company suspended mining operations and gold production from the GEZ at Goldex, following the receipt of recommendations from independent consultants to halt underground mining operations during the investigation into geotechnical concerns with the rock above the mining horizon. As a result, the Company wrote off substantially all of its investment in the Goldex mine (approximately $254 million), took a closure provision of approximately $44 million and reclassified all of the remaining 1.6 million ounces of proven and probable gold reserves (approximately 0.9 million ounces of gold in proven reserves (14.8 million tonnes grading 1.87 grams of gold per tonne) and approximately 0.7 million ounces of gold in probable reserves (13.0 million tonnes grading 1.6 grams of gold per tonne) estimated as of December 31, 2010), other than the ore stockpiled on surface, as mineral resources in the third quarter of 2011. The surface stockpile was processed in the Goldex mill by October 30, 2011.

In July 2012, the Company approved the development of the M Zone and the E Zone of the Goldex mine project. Production from these zones is expected to be achieved in the second quarter of 2014. Development work is continuing underground on the M and E Zones. Exploration on the D Zone continues with underground diamond drilling.

The proven and probable reserves at Goldex as at December 31, 2012 were approximately 0.3 million ounces of gold comprised of 7.0 million tonnes grading 1.55 grams per tonne, all in the M and E Zones. Goldex also had measured and indicated resources of approximately 27.2 million tonnes grading 1.84 grams of gold per tonne, and inferred resources of approximately 34.6 million tonnes grading 1.52 grams of gold per tonne as at December 31, 2012.

The Company anticipates that 5,100 tonnes of ore per day grading 1.54 grams per tonne (diluted) will be extracted and processed at the M and E Zones over the next 3.5 years. Commercial production is expected to be achieved during the second quarter of 2014. Total cash costs per ounce are estimated to be approximately $900 in 2013 and estimated 2013 capital expenditures are $70 million.

Certain satellite zones at the Goldex mine project are under evaluation to give more flexibility for the operation and/or extend the mine life.

38            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Location Map of the Goldex Mine Project (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

The Goldex property is accessible by provincial highway. The elevation is approximately 302 metres above sea level. All of the Goldex mine project's power requirements were supplied by Hydro-Quebec through connections to its main power transmission grid. All of the water that was required at the Goldex mine project was sourced directly by aqueduct from the Thompson River immediately adjacent to the minesite or through recirculation of water from the surface pond and the auxiliary tailings pond. For additional information regarding the Abitibi region in which the Goldex mine project is located, including information with respect to climate, topography, vegetation and mining personnel, see "– Property, Plant and Equipment – LaRonde Mine".

The Goldex mine project operates under a mining lease obtained from the Ministry of Natural Resources (Quebec) and under certificates of approval granted by the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec). The Goldex property, in which the Company has a 100% working interest, consists of 22 contiguous mining claims and, since April 2006, one provincial mining lease (98.6 hectares), covering an aggregate of 331.2 hectares. The property is made up of three blocks: the Probe block (130.7 hectares); the Dalton block (10.4 hectares); and the Goldex Extension block (190.1 hectares). The claims are renewable every second year upon payment of a small fee. The mining lease expires in 2028 and is automatically renewable for three further ten-year terms upon payment of a small fee. The Company also has one lease covering 418.5 hectares of surface rights that are used for the auxiliary tailings pond. This lease is renewable annually upon payment of a small fee.

The Goldex property includes underground operations that can be accessed from two shafts, a processing plant, an ore storage facility and other related facilities. The GEZ, which was the gold deposit on which the Company was focusing its production efforts before production was suspended indefinitely on October 19, 2011, was discovered in 1989 on the Goldex Extension block (although the Company believes a small portion of the GEZ occurs on the Probe block). On November 29, 2012, the Company purchased the 5% net smelter return royalty interest on the Probe block from Probe Mines Limited ("Probe") for cash consideration of C$14 million. Up to an additional C$4 million (in cash or common shares of the Company, at the election of Probe) may become payable by the Company to Probe if certain production

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            39

Table of Contents



thresholds are achieved on the Probe block. In 2012, exploration and development work continued on the M Zone and the E Zone.

In late 1997, the Company completed a mining study that indicated the deposit was not economically viable to mine at the then-prevailing gold price (approximately $323 per ounce of gold) using the mining approach chosen and drill-hole-indicated grade. The property was placed on care and maintenance and the workings were allowed to flood. In February 2005, a new mineral reserve and resource estimate was completed for the GEZ which, coupled with a feasibility study, led to a probable mineral reserve estimate of 1.6 million ounces of gold contained in 20.1 million tonnes of ore grading 2.54 grams of gold per tonne. The GEZ resource model was revised and, in March 2005, the Company approved a feasibility study and the construction of the Goldex mine. The mine achieved commercial production on August 1, 2008 and consistently operated at or above the designed rate of 6,900 tonnes per day until its operations were suspended in October 2011.

Based on the results of a scoping study completed in July 2009, the Company determined to expand the mine and mill operations at Goldex to 8,000 tonnes per day. This project was completed in 2010. Capital costs in connection with the expansion totalled $10 million. The crusher for the expansion was commissioned at the end of the first quarter of 2010 at a rate of 7,811 tonnes per day.

The Goldex mine produced 135,478 ounces of gold in 2011 at total cash costs of $472 per ounce. The Goldex mine project is not expected to produce more gold from the GEZ until at least the geotechnical concerns with the rock above the mining horizon are resolved.

Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Goldex Mine Project (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

40            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


At the time the Company commenced construction of the Goldex mine, the surface facilities included a headframe, a hoistroom, a surface building containing a mechanical shop, a warehouse and an office. In addition, the Goldex property had a 790-metre deep shaft (Shaft #1), which provided access to underground workings. Shaft #1 is predominantly used to hoist waste rock from development activities.

The sinking of a new production shaft was completed in 2007. This shaft (Shaft #2) is a 5.5-metre diameter shaft with a 50-centimetre thick concrete lining and is used for ventilation as well as hoisting services. Shaft #2 is 865 metres deep and includes five stations. A refurbished friction hoist was installed for production and service duties, and an auxiliary hoist was installed for emergency and personnel service. The production hoist is equipped with one cageskip. Each skip has a 21.5-tonne capacity and the shaft can hoist an average of 7,000 to 8,000 tonnes of ore per day.

Mining Methods

Prior to the suspension of mining operations on October 19, 2011, the Goldex mine used a high volume bulk mining method, which was made possible through the use of large mining stopes. Drilling and blasting of 165-millimetre production holes was used to obtain a muck size large enough to be economically efficient. Using this method required a percentage of the broken ore to be kept in the stope to reduce the backfilling cost and to reduce sloughing on the walls. Little ore and waste development was necessary to mine out the deposit.

The Company expects to mine the M and E Zones using primary and secondary stope methods. The Company also plans to paste fill to ensure long term stability. For both zones, stopes are planned to be 55 metres high. The width and length will depend on rock mass quality, but an average stope should be approximately 100,000 tonnes. Ore pass systems and scoop trams will be used for the M Zone, while trucks and scoop trams are planned for the E Zone.

Surface Facilities

Plant construction at Goldex commenced in the second quarter of 2006 and was completed in the first quarter of 2008. The plant reached design capacity in the second quarter of 2009. Grinding at the Goldex mill was done through a two-stage circuit comprised of a SAG mill and a ball mill. As part of the expansion project commenced in 2009, a surface crusher was added to reduce the size of ore transferred to the surface from 150 millimetres to 50 millimetres. A lamellar decanter was also added to recover small particles present in the water overflow of the concentrate thickener. The underflow pump of this thickener was upgraded following flotation circuit modification to increase the pull rate of the small particles. Approximately two-thirds of the gold was recovered through a gravity circuit, passed over shaking tables and smelted on site. The remainder of the gold and pyrite was recovered by a flotation process. The concentrate was then thickened and trucked to the mill at the LaRonde mine where it was further treated by cyanidation. Gold recovered was consolidated with precious metals from the LaRonde and Lapa mines. The Company reached an average gold recovery of 93.38% in 2011, prior to the suspension of mining.

A new backfill plant is currently under construction at the surface. The plant will fill stope in the M and E Zones. The tailing thickener underflow will feed the backfill plant and two disk filters will increase the density before the continuous mixer. Cement will be added at a ratio of 6% and then sent to the underground mine with a positive displacement pump. The capacity of the paste production is expected to be 5,500 tonnes per day.

Following the metallurgical tests that have been performed on the M and E Zones, the results show no significant change on the performance obtained. The only factor that will influence the flotation circuit is the cement present in the backfill stope that will be sloping with the ore as dilution. This will require a pH control (using sulphuric acid), a chemicals reservoir and pumps to be added to the mill.

In addition, surface facilities at the Goldex property include an electrical sub-station, a compressor building, a service building for administration and changing rooms, a warehouse building, a concrete headframe above Shaft #2, a hazardous waste storage facility and a dome covering the ore stockpile.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            41

Table of Contents


Mineral Recoveries

Prior to the suspension of mining operations on October 19, 2011, the Goldex mill processed approximately 2.48 million tonnes of ore, averaging approximately 8,173 tonnes of ore treated per day and operating at approximately 95% of available time. The following table sets out the metal recoveries at the Goldex mine in 2011.

 Head
Grades
 Gravity Recovery Flotation-Cyanidation
Recovery
 Global Recovery Payable
Production
 

Gold1.82 g/t  67.76%  25.63%  93.38% 135,478 oz 

The Company expects that approximately 5,100 tonnes of ore per day will be mined at the M and E Zones.

Environmental Matters

Environmental permits for the construction and operation of an ore extracting infrastructure at the Goldex mine were received from the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec) in October 2005. The permits also covered the construction and operation of a sedimentation pond for mine water treatment and sewage facilities, and these facilities were built at the Goldex mine site. In June 2009, the permits were revised to allow the expansion of the mine and mill operations to 8,500 tonnes per day. In June 2012, environmental permits were received for the construction and operation of a paste backfill plant in connection with the development of the M and E Zones.

In November 2006, the Company and the Quebec government signed an agreement permitting the Company to dispose of the Goldex tailings at the Manitou minesite, a tailings site formerly used by an unrelated third party and abandoned to the Quebec government. The Manitou tailings site has issues relating to acid drainage, and the construction of tailings facilities by the Company and the deposit of tailings from the Goldex plant on the Manitou tailings site was accepted by the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks (Quebec) as a valid rehabilitation plan to address the acid generation problem at Manitou. Under the agreement, the Company managed the construction and operation of the tailings facilities and the Quebec government paid all additional costs above the Company's budget for tailings facilities set out in the Goldex feasibility study. The Quebec government retains responsibility for all environmental contamination at the Manitou tailings site and for final closure of the facilities. In addition, the Company built a separate tailings deposit area (auxiliary tailings pond) near the Goldex mine. Environmental permits for the construction and operation of the auxiliary tailings pond were received in March 2007. In 2011, 237,615 tonnes of Goldex tailings were discharged to the auxiliary pond for a total to date of 764,077 tonnes. At the Manitou site, 2.20 million tonnes of Goldex tailings were discharged for a total to date of 8.095 million tonnes. In 2012, no tailings were sent to the auxiliary tailings pond or to the Manitou tailings site.

A new dyke was built in the summer of 2011 in the auxiliary tailings pond to create a second polishing basin to reduce total suspended solids in the discharged water during spring time. Construction of this dyke was necessary following a notice of infraction received in 2011 from the Quebec Ministry of Environment for exceeding of the permitted total suspended solids.

Following suspension of mining operations at the Goldex property, the mine closure costs were revised to account for the change in conditions at the site. The estimated total for the closure costs of the Goldex mine is approximately $51.4 million, comprised of the following: $1.2 million for demolition, $1 million for engineering, $0.45 million for site preliminary works, $5.4 million for mining site rehabilitation (primarily for backfilling of the zone with high subsidence), $23.2 million for rock grouting and soil improvement, $0.26 million for revegetation of the site, $0.06 million to rehabilitate the sedimentation pond, $0.2 million to rehabilitate the waste rock pile, $1.03 million to rehabilitate the South Tailings basin area, $0.7 million for geotechnical and environmental monitoring, $17.6 million for property purchases and $0.3 million for Baie-Dorée road rehabilitation. In addition, a separate provision of approximately $4.6 million exists for the remaining participation of the Company in the rehabilitation of the Manitou site. In 2011 and 2012, the Company spent $7.7 million and $21.5 million, respectively, on mine closure costs at Goldex.

Capital Expenditures

As a result of the Goldex mine closure, from January to mid-October 2012, Goldex was considered an exploration project and, accordingly, none of the expenses incurred at Goldex were capitalized. A feasibility study for the M and E Zones was completed in mid-October 2012, which demonstrated the potential for a new mining project at the M and E Zones.

42            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Accordingly, from mid-October until the end of 2012, all expenses were capitalized at Goldex. Total expenditures at Goldex in 2012 were $26.7 million for development of the M and E Zones and $14.3 million for remediation.

Capital expenditures of $70 million have been approved to further develop the M Zone and the E Zone in 2013. This amount includes $21 million for the paste plant and $5 million for new mining equipment and infrastructure refurbishing. The sustaining capital for the life of mine is approximately $26 million.

Development

During 2011, approximately 4,256 metres of lateral and vertical development were completed at a cost of $15.3 million, including development following the suspension of mining operations on October 19, 2011. At the present time, development work continues underground on the M Zone, and exploration continues with diamond drilling. In 2012, 4,534 metres of development were completed at a total cost of $23.7 million to develop the M Zone and the E Zone and for exploration of the D Zone.

Development work continues underground on the M and E Zones. A total of 4,800 metres of development at a cost of approximately $23 million is planned for both zones in 2013. In 2014, 4,320 metres will be required to complete the development of the M and E Zones.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The Goldex property is located near the southern boundary of the Archean-age (2.7 billion years old) Abitibi Subprovince, a typical granite-greenstone terrane located within the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. The southern contact of the Abitibi Subprovince with the Pontiac Subprovince is marked by the east-southeast trending CLL Fault Zone, the most important regional structural feature. The Goldex deposit is hosted within a quartz diorite sill, the "Goldex Granodiorite", located in a succession of mafic to ultramafic volcanic rocks that are all generally oriented west-northwest.

The GEZ extends from 500 to 800 metres below the surface and is entirely hosted by the Goldex Granodiorite. The limits of the zone are defined by the intensity of the quartz vein stockwork envelope and by gold assays. The zone is almost egg-shaped; it is over 300 metres tall by 450 metres long (in a west-northwest direction) and its thickness increases rapidly from 25 metres along the east-west edges to almost 150 metres in the centre.

In 2012, exploration efforts at Goldex were focused on the M Zone, E Zone and D Zone. These zones are defined by quartz tourmaline veins and gold assays are similar to the GEZ. The M Zone has been defined as having a length of 160 metres, a height of 120 metres and a thickness of 115 metres. The E Zone is adjacent to the eastern end of the GEZ, and has a length of 150 metres, a height of 150 metres and a thickness of 100 metres. The D Zone is approximately 150 metres below the GEZ and close to 1,500 metres below the surface. It appears to have an approximate length of 500 metres.

Mineralization

Gold mineralization at Goldex corresponds to the quartz-tourmaline vein deposit type. The Goldex gold-bearing quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins and veinlets have strong structural control. The most significant structure directly related to mineralization is a discrete shear zone, the Goldex Mylonite, that is up to five metres wide and occurs within the Goldex Granodiorite, just south of the GEZ and north of the M Zone. The quartz-tourmaline-pyrite vein mineralization is controlled by minor fracture zones that are oriented west-northwest and dip steeply north or south. The fractures are parallel to, but north of, the Goldex Mylonite. Within the GEZ and the M and E Zones are three vein sets, the most important of which are extensional-shear veins dipping 30 degrees south and usually less than 10 centimetres thick. The vein sets and associated alteration combine to form stacked envelopes up to 30 metres thick.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            43

Table of Contents


Strong albite-sericite alteration of the host-rock quartz diorite surrounds the quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins and covers almost 80% of the mineralized zone; outside of the envelopes, prior chlorite alteration affects the quartz diorite and gives it a darker grey-green colour. Occasionally, enclaves of relatively unaltered medium grey-green-coloured quartz diorite (with no veining or gold) are found within the GEZ and the M and E Zones; they are included exceptionally as internal waste to allow for a smooth shape, required for mining purposes.

Most of the gold occurs as microscopic particles that are almost always associated with pyrite, generally adjacent to grains and crystals but also 20% included within the pyrite. The gold-bearing pyrite occurs in the quartz-tourmaline veins and in narrow fractures in the sericite-albite-altered quartz diorite (generally immediately adjacent to the veins). Less than 1.5% of the gold occurs as the mineral calaverite, a gold telluride.

Exploration

Three different zones in the Goldex granodiorite intrusive were drilled in 2012. The main exploration focus was the D Zone, with 41.9 kilometres of drilling (representing approximately 60% of total drilling). 12.7 kilometres (18%) were drilled in the satellite zones above the M Zone and 15.5 kilometres (22%) were drilled in the E Zone sector to the east of the GEZ.

In 2012, $14.1 million was spent on exploration at Goldex. A total of 202 holes were drilled using diamond drilling methods for a total length of approximately 70.1 kilometres, compared to 107 holes for a total length of approximately 47 kilometres in 2011. Expenses in 2012 included the extension of the exploration ramp to level 95 and general costs for underground activities (such as electricity and pumping expenses) amounting to approximately $5 million and a study of the D Zone at a cost of $0.32 million.

The 2013 exploration program is budgeted to include 21.6 kilometres of diamond drilling at a cost of $3.5 million. The primary target is the upper portion of the D Zone, where 17 kilometres of drilling is planned. An additional 4.6 kilometres of drilling is planned for the satellites zones above the M Zone (M2-M5) and the S Zone. In 2013, a geo-mechanical study relating to mineralized zones is also planned at an expected cost of $0.5 million. Accordingly, the aggregate cost of the 2013 exploration program is expected to be $4 million.

Kittila Mine

The Kittila mine, which commenced commercial production in May 2009, is located approximately 900 kilometres north of Helsinki and 50 kilometres northeast of the town of Kittila in northern Finland. At December 31, 2012, the Kittila mine was estimated to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 4.8 million ounces of gold comprised of 33.1 million tonnes of ore grading 4.49 grams per tonne. The Kittila mine is accessible by paved road from the village of Kiistala, which is located on the southern portion of the main claim block. The gold deposit is located near the small village of Rouravaara, approximately ten kilometres north of the village of Kiistala, accessible via a paved road. The property is close to infrastructure, including hydro power, an airport and the town of Kittila. The project also has access to a qualified labour force, including mining and construction contractors.

The total landholdings surrounding and including the Kittila mine comprise one mining licence (licence area of 845 hectares and licence extension application area of 288 hectares) and 236 tenements covering approximately 21,212 hectares. The mineral titles form a continuous block around the Kittila mining licence. The block has been divided into the Suurikuusikko area, the Suurikuusikko West area, the Suurikuusikko East area and the Kittila mining licence centred at 25.4110 degrees longitude east and 67.9683 degrees latitude north.

The boundary of the mining licence is determined by ground-surveyed points whereas the boundaries of the other tenements are not required to be surveyed. All of the tenements in the Kittila mine are registered in the name of Agnico-Eagle Finland Oy, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. According to the Finnish government's land tenure records, all tenements are in good standing. The expiry dates of the tenements vary from June 2013 to August 2017. Tenements are initially valid for four years, provided exploration work in the area is reported annually and a small annual fee is paid to maintain title; extensions for titles can be granted for 11 additional years on payment of a slightly higher fee and active exploration in the area. Agnico-Eagle Finland Oy also holds the mining licence in respect of the Kittila mine. The mine is subject to a 2.0% net smelter return royalty payable to the Republic of Finland.

The Kittila mine area is sparsely populated and is situated between 200 and 245 metres above sea level. The topography is characterized by low rolling forested hills separated by marshes, lakes and interconnected rivers. The gold deposit is situated on an area of land that has no special use at present and there is sufficient land available for tailings facilities. Water requirements for the Kittila mine are sourced from the nearby Seurujoki River, recirculation of water from pit

44            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



dewatering and tailings pond water. The Kittila region is located within the South-West Lapland zone of the northern boreal vegetation zone characterized by spruce forests, marshes and bogs.

The mine is located within the Arctic Circle but the climate is moderated by the Gulf Stream off the coast of Norway such that northern Finland's climate is comparable to that of eastern Canada. Winter temperatures range from -10 to -30 degrees Celsius, whereas summer temperatures range from 10 degrees Celsius to the mid-20s. Exploration and mining work can be carried out year-round. Because of its northern latitude, winter days are extremely short with a brief period of 24-hour darkness around the winter solstice. Conversely, summer days are very long with a brief period of 24-hour daylight in early summer around the summer solstice. Annual precipitation varies between five and 50 centimetres, one-third of which falls as snow. Snow accumulation usually begins in November and remains until March or April.

Location Map of the Kittila Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

The Company acquired its 100%, indirect interest in the Kittila mine through the acquisition of Riddarhyttan completed in November 2005. See "– History and Development of the Company". In June 2006, on the basis of an independently reviewed feasibility study, the Company approved construction of the Kittila mine. Mining at Kittila started initially as open pit mining. This open pit mining was completed in November 2011 and all mining is currently carried out from the underground via ramp access. The initial underground stope was mined in early 2010. Ore is processed in a 3,000-tonne per day surface processing plant that was commissioned in late 2008. Limited gold concentrate production started in September 2008 and gold dore bar production commenced in January 2009. During 2010, throughput at the Kittila mine occurred at design levels and gold recoveries continued to improve. The Kittila mine is anticipated to produce approximately 173,708 ounces of gold in 2013 at estimated total cash costs per ounce of approximately $565. Over the period of 2013 to 2043, total annual average gold production of approximately 141,442 ounces is anticipated. A scoping study is underway to assess the feasibility of significantly increasing the annual gold production.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT45

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Kittila Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

The orebodies at Kittila were mined initially from two open pits, followed by underground operations to mine the deposits at depth. Additional, smaller open pits will be used to mine any remaining mineral reserves close to the surface in the future. Open pit mining started in May 2008 and the extracted ore was stockpiled. As of December 2012, a total of 3.9 million

46            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



tonnes of ore have been processed, including ore both from the open pits and underground, 0.46 million tonnes of ore are currently stockpiled and 33.1 million tonnes of waste rock have been excavated. Work on the ramp and other work to access the reserves underground continued throughout 2012. Total underground (lateral and vertical) development at the end of 2012 is approximately 29,000 metres. Underground mining commenced in the fourth quarter of 2010 and, at the end of 2012, a total of 0.93 million tonnes of ore has been mined from the underground portion of the mine.

Mining Methods

At the Kittila mine, the Suurikuusikko and the Rouravaara orebodies are currently mined by underground mining methods and access to the underground mine is via ramp. Approximately 3,000 tonnes of ore per day are fed to the concentrator. The underground mining method is open stoping with delayed backfill. Stopes are between 25 and 40 metres high and yield approximately 10,000 tonnes of ore per stope. To ensure sufficient ore production is available to supply the mill, over 6,000 metres of tunnels will be developed each year. After extraction, stopes are filled with paste backfill or cemented backfill to enable the safe extraction of ore in adjacent stopes. Ore will be trucked to the surface crusher via the ramp access system.

Surface mining finished in 2012; mining stopped at the Rouvaara open pit in April 2012 and mining at the Suurikuusikko pit was completed in early November.

Surface Facilities

Construction of the processing plant and associated equipment was completed in 2008 and facilities on site include an office building, a maintenance facility for the open pit equipment, a warehouse, a maintenance shop, an oxygen plant, a processing plant, a paste backfill plant, a tank farm, a crusher, conveyor housings and an ore bin. In addition, some temporary structures house contractor offices and work areas.

The ore at Kittila is treated by grinding, flotation, pressure oxidation and CIL circuits. Gold is recovered from the carbon in a Zadra elution circuit and is recovered from the solution using electrowinning and then poured into dore bars using an electric induction furnace.

Mineral Recoveries

In 2012, the Kittila mill processed 1,090,365 million tonnes of ore with an availability of 86% for an average throughput of 2,996 tonnes per day.

The following table sets out the gold production at the Kittila mine in 2012:


Head
Grade
Overall
Metal
Recovery
Payable
Production

Gold5.68 g/t88.3%175,878 oz

Ore processing at Kittila consists of two stages. In the first stage, ore is enriched by flotation and in the second stage the gold is extracted by pressure oxidation and cyanide-in-leach processes. Flotation recoveries were very stable and continued to improve during 2012. They averaged 94.8% during the year.

Recoveries in the second stage of the process were also very stable and good in 2012, averaging 93.2% over the year. Modifications done in 2012 inside the autoclave resulted in better oxygen distribution and sludge flow resulting in improved recoveries. Test work will continue in 2012 to try to further improve the control of the process.

Environmental Matters

The Company currently holds a mining licence, an environmental permit and operational permits in respect of the Kittila mine. All permits necessary to begin production were received during 2008.

The construction of the first phase of the tailings dam and waterproof bottom layer was completed in the fall of 2008. This first phase is sufficient to hold tailings from three years of production. Work began on the second phase in 2009 and continues according to plans and permit requirements. Water from dewatering the mine and water used in the mine and

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            47

Table of Contents



mill is collected and treated by sedimentation. Emissions and environmental impact are monitored in accordance with the comprehensive monitoring program that has been approved by the Finnish environmental authorities. Work on enhancing the scrubbing of mill gases initiated in 2012 was postponed to 2014 due to reviews by authorities of the permit levels. There are no material environmental liabilities related to the Kittila mine.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures at the Kittila mine during 2012 totaled approximately 59.9 million, which included paste backfill plant construction, mill modification, underground development, exploration and conversion drilling costs within the mining licence area and sustaining capital costs. The Company expects capital expenditures at the Kittila mine to be approximately $49 million in 2013, most of which will be used for mining equipment, development and construction of underground infrastructure and exploration and conversion drilling on the mining licence area.

Development

Open pit mining was completed at the Roura pit in April 2012 and at the Suurikuusikko pit in November 2012. A total of 492,178 tonnes of ore were mined from the Suurikuusikko pit and 86,130 tonnes of ore were mined from the Roura pit in 2012.

In 2012, underground development continued in both the Suurikuusikko and Rouravaara zones. 7,518 metres of ramp and sublevel access development was completed during the year. A total of 118,000 tonnes of ore from development and 523,000 tonnes of stope ore were mined in 2012. The Company expects to complete 8,223 metres of lateral development and 635 metres of vertical development during 2013.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The Kittila mine is situated within the Kittila Greenstone belt, part of the Lapland Greenstone belt in the Proterozoic-age Svecofennian geologic province. The appearance and geology of the area is similar to that of the Abitibi region of the Canadian Shield. In northern Finland, the bedrock is typically covered by a thin but uniform blanket of unconsolidated glacial till. Bedrock exposures are scarce and irregularly distributed.

The mine area is underlain by mafic volcanic and sedimentary rocks metamorphosed to greenschist assemblages and assigned to the Kittila group. The major rock units trend north to north-northeast and are near-vertical. The volcanics are further sub-divided into iron-rich tholeiitic basalts (Kautoselka Formation) located to the west and magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalt, coarse volcaniclastic units, graphitic schist and minor chemical sedimentary rocks (Vesmajarvi Formation) located to the east. The contact between these two rock units consists of a transitional zone (the Porkonen Formation) varying between 50 and 200 metres in thickness. This zone is strongly sheared, brecciated and characterized by intense hydrothermal alteration and gold mineralization, features consistent with major brittle-ductile deformation zones. It includes the north-northeast-oriented Suurikuusikko Trend.

Mineralization

The Porkonen Formation hosts the Kittila gold deposit, which contains multiple mineralized zones stretching over a strike length of more than 25 kilometres. Most of the work has been focused on the 4.5-kilometre stretch that hosts the known gold reserves and resources. From north to south, the zones are Rimminvuoma ("Rimpi-S"), the deep extension of Rimminvuoma ("Rimpi Deep"), North Rouravaara ("Roura-N"), Central Rouravaara ("Roura-C"), depth extension of Rouravaara and Suurikuusikko ("Suuri/Roura Deep"), Suurikuusikko ("Suuri"), Etela and Ketola. The Suuri and Suuri/Roura Deep zones include several parallel sub-zones that have previously been referred to as Main East, Main Central and Main West. The Suuri zone hosts approximately 26% of the current probable gold reserve estimate on a contained-gold basis, while Suuri Deep has approximately 19%, Roura-C approximately 7%, Roura Deep approximately 22%, Roura-N approximately 1%, Rimpi Deep approximately 19%, Rimpi-S approximately 5%, Ketola approximately 1% and Etela approximately 0.2%.

Gold mineralization in these zones is associated with intense hydrothermal alteration (carbonate-albite-sulphide), and is almost exclusively refractory, locked inside fine-grained sulphide minerals: arsenopyrite (approximately 73%) or pyrite (approximately 23%). The rest is "free gold", which is manifested as extremely small grains of gold in pyrite.

48            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Exploration

In 1986, the discovery of coarse visible gold in quartz-carbonate veining along a road cut near the village of Kiistala alerted the Geological Survey of Finland ("GTK") to the gold exploration potential of the area. Following this discovery, GTK initiated regional exploration over the area and deployed a wide range of indirect exploration tools to explore this relatively unexplored area. From 1987 to 2005, GTK, and later Riddarhyttan, undertook drilling programs and other testing on the property. After it acquired the property in 1998, Riddarhyttan continued to investigate the metallurgical properties of the refractory gold mineralization with the objective of demonstrating its recoverability and assessing suitable processing scenarios and initiated engineering and environmental studies to assess the feasibility of a mining project.

Diamond drilling is used for exploration on the Kittila property. Most of the work on the mining licence area has focused on the Suuri and Roura zones. As of December 31, 2012, a total of 2,625 drill holes, totalling 762,554 metres, have been completed on the property. In 2012, between three and eight drill machines worked on the Kittila property: one to two drills on underground infill drilling; two to six drills on mine exploration; and one to two drills on resource-to-reserve conversion drilling. A total of 330 drill holes were completed for a length of 70,897 metres. Of these drill holes, 232 (21,040 metres) were for definition drilling, 37 (7,959 metres) were for conversion drilling and 61 (41,898 metres) were related to mine exploration. Total expenditures for diamond drilling in 2012 were $16.2 million, including $2.8 million for definition and delineation drilling

In 2012, proven and probable gold reserves decreased by 0.4 million ounces to 4.8 million ounces (33.1 million tonnes of ore grading 4.49 grams per tonne). This decrease was primarily due to a combination of the introduction of more stringent criteria for determining the cut-off, a more conservative stope-design and production planning process and higher operating costs. The Rimpi Deep zone was the only zone where reserves increased (+0.9 million ounces) as a result of exploration drilling. Indicated mineral resources decreased by 5.1 million tonnes to 7.9 million tonnes of ore grading 2.65 grams per tonne. Inferred mineral resources increased by 11.0 million tonnes to 19.0 million tonnes of ore grading 3.88 grams per tonne.

A successful deep drilling program in 2012 at the Rimpi Deep zone, which is located immediately below the Rimpi-S zone, has converted a large amount of inferred resources into probable reserves in this area. The gold mineralization in Rimpi Deep is still open at depth and to the north.

A resource-to-reserve conversion drilling campaign was carried out at Suuri, Roura and Rimpi-S in 2012, which did not increase reserves significantly.

Outside of the Kittila mining licence area, systematic diamond drilling and target focused ground geophysics continued along the Suurikuusikko Trend, and a number of new targets were tested by diamond drilling. Encouraging results were obtained from new gold zones in the Kuotko West area located approximately 10 kilometres north of the Kittila mine site. A total of 44 diamond drill holes totalling 15,436 metres were drilled on exploration targets outside of the mining licence area in 2012.

The 2013 exploration budget for the Kittila mine is approximately $7.4 million ($6.2 million for minesite exploration and $1.2 million for resource-to-reserve conversion) and includes over 24,600 metres in diamond drilling (16,200 metres for minesite exploration and 8,400 metres for resource-to-reserve conversion), using up to four drills throughout the year to help further identify the gold reserve and resource potential of the Kittila property.

In addition, $2.6 million of exploration expenditures, including an estimated 11,000 metres of diamond drilling, is planned for exploration along the 25-kilometre Suurikuusikko Trend in 2013.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            49

Table of Contents


Pinos Altos Mine

The Pinos Altos Mine commencedmine achieved commercial production in November 2009. It is located on an 11,000-hectare property in the Sierra Madre gold belt, 285 kilometres west of the City of Chihuahua in the State of Chihuahua in northern Mexico. At December 31, 2010,2012, the Pinos Altos Minemine, including the Creston Mascota deposit, was estimated to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 3.32.7 million ounces of gold and 9274.4 million ounces of silver comprised of 44.238.1 million tonnes of ore grading 2.302.21 grams of gold per tonne and 64.7860.71 grams of silver per tonne. The Pinos Altos property is made up of threetwo blocks: the ParrenaAgnico Eagle Mexico Concessions (19(22 concessions, 6,041.126,810.2 hectares), the Madrono Concessions (17 concessions, 873.3 hectares) and the Pinos Altos Concession (one concession, 4,192.2Concessions (18 concessions, 5,053.1 hectares).

Location Map of the Pinos Altos Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

The Madrono Concessions (which cover approximatelyApproximately 74% of the current Pinos Altos mineral resources)reserves and resources are subject to a net smelter royalty of 3.5% payable to Minerales El MadronoPinos Altos Explotación y Exploración S.A. de C.V. ("Madrono"PAEyE"). The Pinos Altos Concession (which covers approximately and the remaining 26% of the current mineral resources) isreserves and resources at Pinos Altos are subject to a 2.5% net smelter return royalty payable to the Consejo de Recursos Minerales, a Mexican Federal Government agency. After 2029, this portion of the property will also be subject to a 3.5% net smelter return royalty payable to Madrono. PAEyE.

The assets at Pinos Altos acquired by the Company from PAEyE in 2006 included an assignment of rights under contracts to explore and exploit the Madrono Concessions and the Pinos Altos Concession, the right to use up to 400 hectares of land owned by Madrono for mining installations for a period of 20 years after formal mining operations have been initiated andinitiated. The Company also obtained sole ownership of the Parrena Concessions.Agnico Eagle Mexico Concessions previously owned by Compania Minera La Parreña S.A. de C.V. During 2008, the Company and MadronoPAEyE entered into an agreement under which the Company acquired further surface rights for open pit mining operations and additional facilities. Infrastructure payments, surface rights payments and advance royalty payments totalling $35.5 million were made to MadronoPAEyE in 2009 in respectas a result of this agreement.

In 2006, the Company concluded negotiations with communal land owners (ejidos) and others for the purchase of 5,745 hectares of land contained within the ParrenaAgnico Eagle Mexico and Pinos Altos Concessions. In addition, a temporary occupation agreement with a 30-year term expiring in 2036 was negotiated with ejido Jesus del Monte for 1,470 hectares of land covered by these same concession blocks. The acquisition of these surface rights for the geologically prospective lands within the district surrounding the Pinos Altos property will facilitate future exploration and mining development in these areas.

50            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The Pinos Altos Minemine is directly accessible by a paved interstate highway that links the cities of Chihuahua and Hermosillo and is connected to a state power grid that is within ten kilometres of an extension of the state power grid. ExistingPinos Altos property. The Company anticipates existing and planned underground mine workings will intercept water resources sufficient to sustain the requirements for future operation. The land position is sufficient for

46            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



construction of all planned surface, infrastructure and mining facilities at the Pinos Altos Mine,mine, including its tailings impoundment area. The Company further believes that a sufficient local and trained workforce is available in northern Mexico to continue to support the operation of the mine.

The Pinos Altos property is characterized by moderate to rough terrain with mixed forest (pine and oak) and altitudes that vary from 1,770 metres to 2,490 metres above sea level. The climate is sub-humid, with about one metre of annual precipitation. The average annual temperature is 18.3 degrees Celsius. Exploration and mining work can be carried out year-round.

In August 2007, on the basis of an independently reviewed feasibility study, the Company approved construction of a mine at Pinos Altos. The mine achieved commercial production in November 2009.

TheCombined production from the Pinos Altos Mine produced 131,097mine and the nearby Creston Mascota deposit was 234,837 payable ounces of gold and 1,186,4522,312,013 payable ounces of silver in 20102012 at total cash costs per ounce of gold of $425.$286. In 2011,2013, combined gold production from the Pinos Altos mine and the Creston Mascota deposit is expected to be approximately 199,000191,000 ounces and silver production is expected to be approximately 2.1 million ounces from Pinos Altos, including operations at Creston Mascota.2,263,841 ounces. Total cash costs per ounce of gold are forecast at approximately $406. Over$300. Under the period of 2011current mine plan, from 2013 to 2026,2029, combined gold production from the Pinos Altos mine, including the Creston Mascota deposit, is expected to average approximately 170,000154,000 ounces of gold per year.

Based on a feasibility study prepared in 2009, the Company determineddecided to build a stand-alone heap leach operation at the satellite open pit Creston Mascota open pit deposit. Creston Mascota is expected to produce approximately 50,00051,489 ounces of gold per year during its five-year mine life.the next five years (2013-2017). Capital costs in connection with the project are expected to total $62 million, of whichwere approximately $7 million will be incurred in 2011.$65 million. The first gold pour from the Creston Mascota deposit occurred on December 28, 2010 and payable gold production in 2010 was 665.6 ounces. Commercialcommercial production from the Creston Mascota isdeposit was achieved in the first quarter of 2011. On September 30, 2012, a movement of ore material was detected on the lower levels of the Creston Mascota leach pad (Phase 1). As a result of this movement, leaching operations were temporarily suspended at Creston Mascota until the upper level of the leach pad (Phase 2) could be prepared as an isolated containment area. These modifications are expected to be achievedcompleted in early 2013 and resumption of leaching operations is expected during the second quarter of 2011.2013. The Company continues to evaluate opportunities to develop other mineral resources that have been identified in the Pinos Altos area as satellite operations.

The Company has engaged the local communities in the project area with hiring, local contracts, education support and medical support programs to ensure that the project provides long-term benefits to the residents living and working in the region. The Company received formal recognition from the Governor of Chihuahua State in April 2008 for distinction as a socially responsible company. In 2010, for the third consecutive year, the Company was designated a socially responsible company by the Mexian Centre for Philanthropy and the Alliance for Social Responsibility of Enterprises. Approximately two-thirds70% of the operating workforce at Pinos Altos are locally hired and more than 99%100% of the permanent workforce at the Company operations in Mexico are Mexican nationals.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            4751

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Pinos Altos Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

In 2010,52            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Surface Plan of the first full year ofCreston Mascota Deposit (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

Milling operations during 2012 at Pinos Altos most of the ore suppliedaveraged 5,020 tonnes processed per day as compared to the mill was from open pit operations.design expectation of 4,000 tonnes per day. The first stopes from the underground operation were mined in the second quarter of the year. Two additional tailings filters were installedmine at the Pinos Altos mill to alleviate below expected levels of throughput, and during the fourth quarter of 2010, the Pinos Altos mill processed, onproduced an average 4,5013,193 tonnes of ore per day or approximately 112.5%as compared to the design expectation of the original design capacity of 4,0003,000 tonnes per day. In addition, an underground paste backfill plant was installedThe open pit mines at Pinos Altos and commissionedthe Creston Mascota deposit produced 23,465,263 tonnes of ore, overburden and waste in 2010. Construction2012, which met the expectation of the heap leach operation at Creston Mascota was more than 90% complete atmine plan for the end of 2010 and pre-production mining and processing had commenced by year-end.year.

Mining Methods

The surface operations at the Pinos Altos Minemine use traditional open pit mining techniques with bench heights of seven metres withand double benches on the footwall and single benching on the hanging wall. Mining is accomplished with front end loaders, trucks, track drills and various support equipment. Based upon geotechnical evaluations, the final pit slopes will vary between 45 degrees and 50 degrees. Performance at the open pit mining operation at Pinos Altos during 20102012 continues to indicate that the equipment, mining methods and personnel selected for the project are satisfactory for future production phases. Approximately 29 million16,007,364 tonnes of ore, overburden and waste were mined during 2010, which exceeded2012, exceeding the planned design capacity of 25 million tonnes per year. During the first ten years of the project's life, it is expected that approximately half of the ore volume processed will be derived from open pit operations, principally at Santo Niño, Oberon de Weber and Creston Mascota. Underground mine production will produce the balance of the ore for the processing plant.year by 2%.

The underground mine, which commenced operations in the second quarter of 2010, uses the long hole sublevel stoping method to extract the ore. The Company has considerable expertise with this mining method, having used the same method at the LaRonde Minemine in Quebec. This method has also been used at various other Mexican mining operations. The stope height is planned at 30 metres and the stope width at 15 metres. Ore is hauled to the surface utilizing underground trucks via a ramp system. The paste backfill system and ventilation system were commissioned in the fourth quarter of 2010 and are now fully operational. During 2010, approximately 331,000 tonnes of ore were mined from the underground portion of the mine. At full capacity, the underground mine is expected to produce a maximum of 4,000 tonnes of ore per day. Performance of the underground mine continues to indicate that the equipment, mining methods, ground control and personnel selected are satisfactory for future production phases. A scoping study is expected to be completed in the

48            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            53

Table of Contents



fourth quarter2010 and are now fully operational. During 2012, approximately 1,155,200 tonnes of 2011 to evaluateore were produced from the potential benefitunderground portion of building a shaft installation to improve the efficiencymine, averaging 3,164 tonnes per day. Currently, the full capacity of the underground mine. Totalmine is 3,000 tonnes of ore per day. However, construction of a shaft hoisting facility to increase the mining capacity to 4,500 tonnes of ore per day was initiated in 2012, with completion of this project expected in 2016. The shaft hoisting capacity will reduce the number of underground trucks required and will continue to maintain mill feed rates at 4,500 tonnes per day in future years as the open pit mines at Pinos Altos become depleted. Approximately 30 kilometres of total lateral development have been completed as of December 31, 2010 was approximately 17 kilometres.2012.

Surface Facilities

The principal mineral processing facilities at the Pinos Altos Minemine are designed to process 4,000 tonnes of ore per day in a conventional process plant circuit which includes single-stagesingle stage crushing, grinding in a SAG and ball mill in closed loop, gravity separation followed by agitated leaching, counter-currentcounter current decantation and metals recovery in the Merrill-Crowe process. Tailings are detoxified and filtered and then used for paste backfill in the underground mine or deposited as dry tailings in an engineered tailings impoundment area. During the initial operationThe Pinos Altos mill processed an average of the mill in the fourth quarter5,033 tonnes of 2009 and the first two quarters of 2010, the tailings filtration capacity was insufficient to allow processing of the original design capacity of 4,000 tonnesore per day due to the presence of more alteration and clay in the near-surface mineralization than had been previously expected. This capacity limitation was resolved by the installation of two additional tailings filters and, by the fourth quarter of 2010, the tailings filtration capacity was in excess of 4,000 tonnes per day.during 2012. Low grade ore at Pinos Altos is processed in a heap leach system designed to accommodate approximately five million tonnes of mineralized material over the life of the project, theproject. The production from heap leach operations is expected to be relatively minor, contributing about 5% of total metal production planned for the life of the mine.

AAs noted above, a separate heap leach operation and ancillary support facilities were built at the Creston Mascota deposit, which is designed to process approximately 4,000 tonnes of ore per day in a three stage crushing, agglomeration and heap leach circuit with carbon adsorption. This project began commissioning in the latter part of 2010, with commercial production expectedachieved in the secondfirst quarter of 2011. During 2012, a total of 1,397,599 tonnes of ore were produced at the Creston Mascota deposit, averaging 3,819 tonnes per day. Based on early performance of the mine and process facilities at the Creston Mascota deposit, the equipment, mining methods and personnel are satisfactory for completion of the planned production phases. The Creston Mascota deposit is expected to produce approximately 50,00053,000 ounces of gold per year during a five-yearthe six-year remaining projected mine life.life (2013-2018).

Surface facilities at the Pinos Altos Mine includemine include: a heap leach pad, pond, liner and pumping system; administrative support offices and change room facilities; camp facilities; a laboratory; a process plant shop; a maintenance shop; a generated power station; surface power transmission lines and substations; the engineered tailings management system; and a warehouse.

Over the life of the mine, recoveries of gold and silver in the milling circuit at Pinos Altos (other than from the Creston Mascota operation)deposit) are expected to average approximately 94%93% and 50%48%, respectively. PreciousThe Company anticipates precious metals recovery from low grade ore processed in the Pinos Altos heap leach facility will average about 68% for gold and 12% for silver. Heap leach recoveries for Creston Mascota ore are expected to average 71% for gold and 16% for silver.

Mineral Recoveries

During 2010,2012, the Pinos Altos mill processed 1.3 million1,837,333 tonnes of ore, averaging approximately 3,6375,020 tonnes of ore treated per day and operating at approximately 95.9%90.6% of available time. The following table sets out the metal recoveries at the Pinos Altos mill in 2010.2012.

  
  Head
Grade
 Dore
Produced
Overall
Metal
Recovery
 Payable
Production
  
Gold 2.902.974 g/t 115,90794.0%165,056 oz 93.54%115,666 oz

Silver 64.9982.29 g/t 1,119,62744.0%2,124,334 oz 40.2%1,104,820 oz

An additional 990,7811,024,976 tonnes of ore were processed and placed on the heap leach pad at Pinos Altos in 2012, with an average grade of 0.710.74 grams of gold per tonne and 21.1524.8 grams of silver per tonne. Cumulative metals recovery on the heap leach pad at Pinos Altos are 52.5%64.14% gold and 9.9%11.99% silver. Heap leach recovery is following the expected cumulative recovery curve and it is expectedanticipated that the ultimate recovery of 68% for gold and 12% for silver will be achieved when leaching is completed.

54            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


An additional 1,532,364 tonnes of ore were processed and placed on the heap leach pad at the Creston Mascota deposit in 2012, with an average grade of 1.74 grams of gold per tonne and 14.77 grams of silver per tonne. Cumulative metals recovery on the heap leach pad at the Creston Mascota deposit are 54% gold and 7.61% silver. Heap leach recovery is following the expected cumulative recovery curve and it is anticipated that the ultimate recovery of 71% for gold and 16% for silver will be achieved when leaching is completed.

Total metal production (from mill and heap leach) at Pinos Altos, including the Creston Mascota deposit, during 20102012 was 131,097234,837 payable ounces of gold and 1,186,3522,312,013 payable ounces of silver.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            49

Table of Contents


Environmental Matters

The Pinos Altos Minemine has received the necessary permit authorizations for construction and operation of a mine, including a Change of Land Use permit and an Environmental Impact Study approval from the Mexican environmental agency ("SEMARNAT"). As of December 31, 2010,2012, all permits necessary for the operation of the Pinos Altos Mine,mine, including the operations at the Creston Mascota deposit, had been received and requests for modifications to allow for future expansion of facilities, including at the Creston Mascota deposit, had been approved or were under review by SEMARNAT.received. Pinos Altos uses the dry stack tailings technology to minimize the geotechnical and environmental risk that can be associated with the rainfall intensities and topographic relief in the Sierra Madre region of Mexico. All of the Mexican environmental regulatory requirements are expected to be met or exceeded by the Pinos Altos Minemine (including operations at the Creston Mascota deposit). Operations at Pinos Altos and the Creston Mascota deposit were deemed to qualify for the "Industria Limpia" (clean industry) designation by SEMARNAT in 2012.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures at the Pinos Altos Minemine during 20102012 were approximately $61.0$25.2 million. Capital expenditures relating to operations at the Creston Mascota deposit during 20102012 were approximately $43.4$2.0 million.

The Company expects sustaining and deferred capital expenditures at Pinos Altos to be approximately $4.8$62 million in 20112013 with average sustaining and deferred capital of approximately $3.7$18 million per year for a projected mine life of approximately 1517 years. Approximately $0.5$13 million in development capital is forecast at the Creston Mascota deposit in 20112013, with sustaining capital expenditures of $0.9$5.4 million during its anticipated five yearremaining six-year mine life.

Development

AtAs of December 31, 20102012, for the mine life to date, more than 77.792.7 million tonnes of ore, overburden and waste had been removed from the open pit mine at Pinos Altos and more than 16.930 kilometres of lateral development had been completed in the underground mine. At the Creston Mascota deposit, approximately 3.818.0 million tonnes of ore, overburden, and overburdenwaste had been removed from the open pit mine as of December 31, 2010.2012.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The Pinos Altos Minemine is in the northern part of the Sierra Madre geologic province, on the northeast margin of the Ocampo Caldera, which hosts many epithermal gold and silver occurrences including the nearby Ocampo mining operation and Moris mine.

The property is underlain by Tertiary-age (less than 45 million years old) volcanic and intrusive rocks that have been disturbed by faulting. The volcanic rocks belong to the lower volcanic complex and the discordantly-overlying upper volcanic supergroup. The lower volcanic complex is represented on the property by the Navosaigame conglomerates (including thinly-bedded sandstone and siltstone) and the El Madrono volcanics (felsic tuffs and lavas intercalated with rhyolitic tuffs, sandy volcanoclastics and sediments). The upper volcanic group is made up of the Victoria ignimbrites (explosive felsic volcanics), the Frijolar andesites (massive to flow-banded, porphyritic flows) and the Buenavista ignimbrites (dacitic to rhyolitic pyroclastics).

Intermediate and felsic dykes as well as rhyolitic domes intrude all of these units. The Santo NiñoNino andesite is a dyke that intrudes along the Santo NiñoNino fault zone.

Structure on the property is dominated by a 10-kilometre by 3-kilometre horst, a fault-uplifted block structure oriented west-northwest, that is bounded on the south by the south-dipping Santo NiñoNino fault and on the north by the north-dipping Reyna de Plata fault. Quartz-gold vein deposits are emplaced along these faults and along transfer faults that splay from the Santo NiñoNino fault.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            55

Table of Contents


Mineralization

Gold and silver mineralization at the Pinos Altos Minemine consists of low sulphidation epithermal type hydrothermal veins and breccias. The Santo NiñoNino structure outcrops over a distance of roughly six kilometres. It strikes at 060 degrees azimuth on its eastern portion and turns to strike roughly 090 degrees azimuth on its western fringe. The structure dips at 70 degrees towards the south. The four mineralized sectors hosted by the Santo NiñoNino structure consist of discontinuous quartz rich lenses named from east to west: El Apache, Oberon de Weber, Santo NiñoNino and Cerro Colorado.

50            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The El Apache lens is the most weakly mineralized. The area hosts a weakly developed white quartz dominated breccia. Gold values are low and erratic over its roughly 750 metre strike length. Past drilling suggests that this zone is of limited extent at depth.

The Oberon de Weber lens has been followed on surface and by diamond drilling over an extent of roughly 500 metres. Shallow holes drilled by the Company show good continuity both in grade and thickness over roughly 550 metres. From previous drilling done by Penoles, continuity at depth appears to be erratic with a weakly defined western rake.

The Santo NiñoNino lens is the most vertically extensive of these lenses. It has been traced to a depth of approximately 750 metres below surface. The vein is followed on surface over a distance of 550 metres and discontinuously up to 650 metres. Beyond its western and eastern extents, the Santo NiñoNino andesite is massive and only weakly altered. Gold grades found are systematically associated with green quartz brecciated andesite.

The Cerro Colorado lens is structurally more complex than the three described above. Near the surface, it is marked by a complex superposition of brittle faults with mineralized zones which are difficult to correlate from hole to hole. Its relation to the Santo NiñoNino fault zone is not clearly defined. Two deeper holes drilled by the Company during this campaign suggest better grade continuity is possible at depth.

The San Eligio zone is located approximately 250 metres north of Santo Niño.Nino. The host rock is brecciated Victoria Ignimbrite, occasionally with rarely, stockworks. There is no andesite in this sector. Unlike the other lenses, the San Eligio lens dips towards the north. The lateral extent seems to be continuous for 950 metres. Its average width is five metres and never exceeds 15 metres. Surface mapping and prospecting has suggested good potential for additional mineralization on strike and at depths below 150 metres. Visible gold has been seen in the drill core.

The minerals present are indicative of an oxidized, epithermal, low sulphidation (and likely low sulphide) precious metals vein system rich in silver. The temperature of formation is thought to have been below 300 degrees Celsius, as no selenium minerals have been found to date. The presence of kaolinite and dickite are indicative of an acidic environment. The presence of hematite crystals in the centre of acanthite indicates that the deposit was probably formed under oxidative conditions.

Several other promising zones are associated with the horst feature in the northwest part of the property. The Creston Mascota deposit is 7 kilometres northwest of the Santo NiñoNino deposit, and is similar, but dips shallowly to the west. The Creston Mascota deposit is about 1,000 metres long and 4 to 40 metres wide, and extends from surface to more than 200 metres depth. The deposit will be exploited by open pit and heap leach starting in 2011. Ore production from the Creston Mascota deposit began in July 2010, with the first gold poured in December 2010.2010 and commercial productions commencing in February 2011.

Exploration

In 2010,2012, minesite exploration activities were primarily focused on definition and delineation of the resources at Santo Niño,Nino, Oberon de Weber, San Eligio and Creston Mascota. A total of 14.925.9 kilometres of minesite exploration drilling, 5.717.9 kilometres of definition drilling and 10.68 kilometres of delineation drilling were completed during the year. Regional exploration in 20102012 focused on the El Cubiro, SinterPenasco Blanco, Veta Escalon, Veta Colorada and Reyna de PlataVeta Flor prospects. Diamond drilling consisted of 36.5 kilometres in 107 drill holes. Detailed geological and structural mapping and sampling was done in the El Cubiro, Mascota and Cerro la Plata areas.5.7 kilometres. More than 14,00023,800 core samples and 1,7775,220 rock samples were sent to a certified laboratory and assayed mainly for gold and silver.

The recently discovered Cubiro mineralization is two kilometres west of the Creston Mascota.Mascota deposit. Cubiro is a surface deposit that strikes northwest, has a steep dip and has been followed along strike for approximately 850 metres. Drilling has intersected significant gold and silver mineralization up to 30 metres wide. The Cubiro deposit is split by a fault that caused 200 metres of displacement to the west, which has been traced by drilling. The zone is still open to the westsoutheast and possibly at depth and to the east.depth.

The Sinter zone is 1,500 metres north northeastnorth-northeast of the Santo NiñoNino zone and is part of the Reyna de Plata gold structure. The steeply dipping mineralization is four to 35 metres wide and almost 900 metres long, with over 350 metres of vertical depth. Sinter is being evaluated for its open pit mining and heap leach potential.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT56                        51AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Other identified mineral resources in the Pinos Altos region include the Bravo and Carola zones adjacent to the Creston Mascota deposit and the Reyna de la Plata prospect further to the east. Exploration efforts will be allocated to these zones as the development continues at Pinos Altos and the Creston Mascota deposit.

In 2013, the Company expects to spend approximately $6.5 million on exploration at the Pinos Altos mine, including $3.5 million on 14,000 metres of conversion drilling and $3.0 million on 12,000 metres of exploration drilling.

La India Mine Project

Construction began at La India in September 2012 and commercial production is anticipated for the second quarter of 2014, three months ahead of the original plan. On average, the La India mine is expected to produce approximately 90,000 ounces of gold annually at total cash costs per ounce of approximately $500 over a mine life of approximately nine years. At December 31, 2012, the La India mine was estimated to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 0.8 million ounces of gold comprised of 33.5 million tonnes of ore grading 0.72 grams per tonne.

The La India property consists of 43 mining concessions totalling approximately 56,000 hectares in the Mulatos Gold Belt. The La India mine project includes the Tarachi deposit and several other prospective targets in the belt. At Tarachi, indicated resources are 34.5 million tonnes grading 0.41 grams of gold per tonne and inferred resources are 72.0 million tonnes grading 0.38 grams of gold per tonne. A metallurgical testing program on Tarachi composite samples has been initiated.

Location Map of the La India Mine Project (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

The Mulatos Gold Belt is part of the Sierra Madre gold and silver belt that also hosts the operating Mulatos gold mine immediately southeast of the La India property and the Pinos Altos mine and the Creston Mascota deposit 70 kilometres to the southeast.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            57

Table of Contents


The La India mine project is located in the municipality of Sahuaripa, southeastern Sonora State, between the small rural towns of Tarachi and Matarachi, which offer basic infrastructure in the form of roads, rural telephone service, small grocery stores and unpaved air strips. More services are available in the town of Sahuaripa located 60 kilometres by gravel road (approximately 2.5 hours) northwest of the La India mine project. The population of the district is estimated to be a few thousand, with most of the inhabitants involved in cattle ranching, farming, forestry and mining and exploration. An adequate supply of labour for mining operations can be drawn from the region. Trained exploration personnel for the La India mine project are mainly sourced from northern Mexico including Hermosillo, Sonora.

The closest major city with an international airport is Hermosillo, the capital of Sonora, located 210 kilometres west-northwest of the La India mine project. Road travel from Hermosillo to the site takes approximately seven hours. Alternatively, the project can be accessed by small aircraft. The Company anticipates that the power supply at the La India project will be provided by diesel generators.

The Company acquired the La India property in November 2011 as part of its acquisition of Grayd. Grayd had explored the property since 2004 and had prepared a preliminary economic assessment of the La India project in December 2010 based on a June 2010 NI 43-101-compliant resource estimate.

Infill drilling at La India from November 2011 to May 2012 allowed the Company to confirm and expand the mineral resources reported in the December 2010 preliminary economic assessment. On August 31, 2012, the Company completed a feasibility study for the construction of a multi-pit mine and heap leach operation on the La India deposit.

Engineering studies and operating and capital cost estimates were developed to exploit only the oxide mineralization at La India; there is no plan to mine sulphide minerals. Metallurgical test results indicate an overall gold recovery of 80%. Total cash costs are expected to be $497 per ounce of gold produced net of by-product silver credits. The pre-production capital cost is estimated at $157.6 million and the life of mine capital cost is expected to total $183.4 million.

As of December 31, 2012, the environmental permits required for construction of the mine had been obtained and the following advances had been achieved:

The climate at La India is semi-arid with seasonal temperatures ranging from 35 degrees celsius to – 2 degrees celsius, and torrential rainfall from July to September. Exploration activities may be conducted year-round.

At the Tarachi deposit, the surface rights in the project area are owned by the Matarachi Ejido (agrarian community) and private parties. All measured, indicated and inferred project resources lie within privately owned or ejido possessed land. Surface access lease agreements have been executed with the property owners or possessors for all identified target areas. The existing agreements permit exploration activities only; if mining activity is contemplated in this exploration area the Company will require further negotiations to acquire the surface rights needed for project development.

Mining and Milling Facilities

Mining Methods

Operations at the La India mine will use traditional open pit mining techniques with bench heights of six metres with front end loaders, trucks, track drills and various support equipment. Based upon geotechnical evaluations, the final pit slopes will vary between 45 degrees and 50 degrees.

Surface Facilities

Current facilities at the La India mine project include an exploration camp and a construction camp. The power for the camps is supplied by diesel generators and water is supplied by a local spring and septic discharges are managed in their respective leach fields. Non-organic waste from the camp is disposed in the Matarachi Ejido landfill.

Construction of the mine began September 2012 and commercial production is expected the second quarter of 2014. The following surface plan details the ultimate mine layout showing ultimate pits and waste rock dump locations, roads, the leach pad and other infrastructure.

58            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Surface Plan of the La India Mine Project (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            59

Table of Contents


Surface facilities at the La India mine project include: a three-stage ore crushing facility; a 50 million tonne capacity lined heap leach pad with process ponds and pumping system; a carbon adsorption plant; a laboratory; a process plant shop; a mining equipment maintenance shop; a generated power station; surface power transmission lines and substations; a warehouse; administrative support offices; and camp facilities.

Environmental Matters

Baseline environmental information has been collected at the La India mine project since late 2008. This information includes surface water sampling, archeological assessment and soil, fauna and flora assessments.

The La India mine project is not located in an area with a special federal environmental protection designation. Both the Manifesto de Impacto Ambiental (an environmental impact statement) and Cambio de Uso de Suelo (a land use change permit) required for project development were granted by the authorities in 2012 once all the prerequisites were provided by the Company.

Some historic mining has been observed in the area but the remaining waste dumps and tailings are small and are not considered to present significant environmental issues.

Capital Expenditures

Pre-production capital cost at La India is estimated at $157.6 million and the life of mine capital cost is expected to amount to $183.4 million. Capital expenditures at the La India mine project during 2012 were approximately $39.2 million and the Company expects capital expenditures to be approximately $92 million in 2013.

Development

Mining at La India is scheduled to begin in late 2013 and early 2014 to achieve commercial production in the second quarter of 2014.

Agreements & Licences

The mining concessions for the La India mine project and Tarachi are controlled by the Company by means of direct ownership and by 11 separate agreements whereby Agnico-Eagle can earn a 100% interest in certain concessions by making cash and share payments. Payment has been made in full for the claims that host most of the measured, indicated and inferred resources. Some concessions are subject to underlying net smelter royalties varying between 1% and 3%, some of which may be purchased by the Company which would result in net smelter royalties of up to 0.5% remaining.

For the Tarachi deposit, payments totalling $3.3 million and shares with value equivalent to $967,500 over an eight year period are required for the Company to earn a 100% interest in the relevant concessions. To date, $1 million has been paid toward these concessions. Some concessions are subject to underlying net smelter royalties varying between 1% and 3%, some of which may be purchased by the Company, which would result in net smelter royalties of up to 0.5% remaining.

The defined mineral reserve and resource and all lands required for infrastructure for the La India mine project are wholly-contained within three privately-held properties which Agnico-Eagle has acquired in order to permit exploration, construction and mine development activities.

At the Tarachi deposit, the surface rights in the project area are owned by the Matarachi Ejido and private parties. All measured, indicated and inferred project resources lie within privately owned or ejido possessed land. Surface access lease agreements have been executed with the property owners or possessors for all identified target areas. The existing agreements permit exploration activities only, further negotiation would be required for any future mine development at the Tarachi deposit.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology and Mineralization

The La India mine project lies within the Sierra Madre Occidental ("SMO") province, an extensive Eocene to Miocene volcanic field from the United States-Mexico border to central Mexico. The La India mine project lies within the western limits of the SMO in an area dominated by outcrops of andesite and dacitic tuffs, overlain by rhyolites and rhyolitic tuffs that were affected by large-scale north-northwest-striking normal faults and intruded by granodiorite and diorite stocks. Incised fluvial canyons cut the uppermost strata and expose the Lower Series volcanic strata.

60            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The project area is predominantly underlain by a volcanic sequence comprised of andesitic and felsic extrusive volcanic strata with interbedded epiclastic volcaniclastic strata of similar composition. The mineral occurrences present in the project area, and the deposit type being sought, are volcanic-hosted epithermal, high-sulphidation gold-silver deposits. Such deposits may be present as veins and/or disseminated deposits. The La India mine project deposit area is one of several high-sulphidation epithermal mineralization centres recognized in the region.

Epithermal high-sulphidation mineralization at the La India mine project developed as a cluster of gold zones (Main and North) aligned north-south within a genetically related zone of hydrothermal alteration in excess of 20 square kilometres in area. Gold mineralization is confined to the Late Eocene rocks within zones of intermediate and advanced argillitic alteration originally containing sulphides, and subsequently oxidized by supergene processes. The North and Main zones are within two kilometres of each other.

Surface outcrop mapping and drill-hole data so far indicate that the gold system at the Tarachi deposit is likely best classified as a gold porphyry deposit.

Exploration

Gold was discovered at the Mulatos deposit by the Spanish colonials in 1806, but indigenous peoples likely exploited the native-gold-bearing oxidized zone of the deposit prior to this. Small underground mines and prospects are present throughout the La Cruz and La Viruela areas, where modern exploration was conducted by New Golden Sceptre Minerals Ltd. and New Goliath Minerals Ltd. (late 1980s), Noranda Inc. (early 1990s) and San Fernando Mining Co. Ltd. (from 1993).

Grayd began to actively explore the project in 2004, including geologic mapping, geochemical rock chip sampling, airborne and ground geophysical surveys, photogrammetric topographic mapping, diamond drilling, reverse circulation drilling, baseline environmental studies and metallurgical testing. Newmont Mining Corp. funded the work between July 2005 and July 2006 and then declined to continue, retaining no interest in the property. The Tarachi deposit, located approximately 10 kilometres north of the La India mine project on the same property, was discovered in 2010.

From 2004 through February 7, 2011, Grayd completed 129 diamond drill holes (13,834 metres) and 560 reverse circulation drill holes (49,552 metres) at the La India mine project. In 2011, 13 diamond drill holes (1,119 metres) and 30 reverse circulation drill holes (2,728 metres) were drilled at the La India mine project and 25 diamond drill holes (5,400 metres) and 67 reverse circulation drill holes (16,144 metres) were drilled at the Tarachi deposit.

The Company expects to spend approximately $2.0 million on exploration at the La India mine project in 2013, which will include drilling the underlying sulphide extensions and the Viruela and Cerro de Oro areas.

From the acquisition of Grayd in November 2011 until December 31, 2012, the Company completed 246 diamond drill holes (19,268 metres) and 108 reverse circulation drill holes (10,460 metres) at the La India mine project, and 42 diamond drill holes (11,190 metres) and 25 reverse circulation drill holes (7,170 metres) at the Tarachi deposit.

The Company expects to spend approximately $6.0 million on exploration at the Tarachi deposit in 2013.

Meadowbank Mine

The Meadowbank Mine,mine, which achieved commercial production in March 2010, is located in the Third Portage Lake area in the Kivalliq District of Nunavut in northern Canada, approximately 70 kilometres north of Baker Lake. At December 31, 2010,2012, the Meadowbank Minemine was estimated to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 3.492.3 million ounces of gold comprised of 34.1025.3 million tonnes of ore grading 3.182.82 grams of gold per tonne. The Company acquired its 100% interest in the Meadowbank Minemine in 2007 as the result of the acquisition of Cumberland (see "– History and Development of the Company").

The fresh water required for domestic camp use, mining and milling is obtained from the intake barge at Third Portage Lake. Power is supplied by a 29-megawatt diesel electric power generation plant with heat recovery.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            61

Table of Contents


Location Map of the Meadowbank Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

The Meadowbank Minemine is held under ten Crown mining leases, three exploration concessions and 5740 Crown mineral claims. The Crown mining leases, which cover the Portage, Goose Island and Goose South deposits, are administered under federal legislation. The mining leases, which have renewable ten-year terms, have no annual work commitments but are subject to annual rent fees that vary according to their renewal date. The mining leases cover approximately 7,400 hectares and expire in either 2016 or 2019. Annual rent currently totals C$18,273. The production lease with the KIA is a surface lease covering 1,354 hectares and requires payment of C$124,530127,800 annually. Production from subsurface lease areas is subject to a royalty of up to 14% of the adjusted net profits, as defined in the Territorial Mining Regulations. In order to conduct exploration on the Inuit-owned lands at Meadowbank, the Company must receive approval for an annual work proposal from the KIA, the body that holds the surface rights in the Kivalliq District and administers land use in the region through various boards. The Nunavut Water Board (the "NWB"), one such board, provided the recommendation to the Ministry of IndianAboriginal Affairs and Northern Development (Canada)Canada to grant the Meadowbank Mine'smine's construction and operating licences in July 2008. The Company has obtained all of the approvals and licences required to build and operate the Meadowbank Mine.mine.

52            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The three Meadowbank exploration concessions comprise approximately 23,10023,126 hectares and are granted by Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., the corporation responsible for administering subsurface mineral rights on Inuit-owned lands in Nunavut. Exploration concessions cover the Vault deposit at Meadowbank and in 20112013 will require annual rental fees of approximately C$92,50492,924 and exploration expensesexpenditures of approximately C$693,780.696,930. During the exploration phase, the concessions can be held for up to 20 years and the concessions can be converted into production leases with annual fees of C$1 per hectare, but no annual work commitments. Production from the concessions is subject to a 12% net profits interest royalty from which annual deductions are limited to 85% of the gross revenue.

62            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


In 2012, the Company signed a production lease with Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. covering the extraction and processing of gold from the Vault deposit. This lease authorizes the Company to mine and process gold from the Vault deposit and sets in place royalty payments that are equivalent to those being paid by the Company at the Portage and Goose pits.

The 5740 Crown mineral claims cover approximately 54,13136,433 hectares at Meadowbank and are subject to land fees and work commitments. Land fees are payable only when work is filed. The most recent filing was in 2009,2012, when approximately C$5,9118,998 in land fees were paid and approximately C$292,4105,491,178 in assessment work was submitted.

The Kivalliq region in which the Meadowbank Minemine is located has an arid arctic climate. The Meadowbank property is situated in an area characterized by low, rolling hills that are covered predominantly in heath tundra with numerous lakes and ponds. All of the open pit mines operate beneath the water level of adjacent lakes and use dykes to prevent water inflow. Elevation ranges from approximately 130 metres at lakeshores up to 200 metres on ridge crests. Operations at the Meadowbank Minemine are expected to be year-round with only minor weather-related interruptions to mining operations; however, these interruptions are not expected to affect ore availability for milling operations or other operating activities.

The Meadowbank Minemine is accessible from Baker Lake, located 70 kilometres to the south, over a 110-kilometre all-weather road completed in March 2008. Baker Lake provides 2.5 months of summer shipping access via Hudson Bay and year-round airport facilities. The Meadowbank Minemine also has a 1,100-metre long gravel airstrip, permitting access by air. The Company will useuses ocean transportation for fuel, equipment, bulk materials and supplies from Montreal, Quebec, (or Hudson Bay port facilities) via barges and ships into Baker Lake during the summer port access period that starts at the end of July in each year. Fuel and supplies are transported year-round to the site from Baker Lake by conventional tractor trailer units using an all-weather private access road.units. Transportation for personnel and air cargo are provided on scheduled or chartered flights. The permanent bases for employees from which to service the Meadowbank Minemine are Val D'Or and Montreal in Quebec and the Kivalliq communities. Since February 2009, all chartered flights have landed directly at Meadowbank.

The Meadowbank Minemine achieved commercial production in March 2010 and produced 265,659366,030 ounces of gold in 20102012 at total cash costs per ounce of $693 and the Company expects that the Meadowbank Mine will produce an average of 399,000 ounces of gold per year from 2012 to 2015 with total cash costs per ounce expected to average $511 over these years.$913. In 2011,2013, total cash costs at Meadowbank are expected to be approximately $597$1,000 per ounce. In 2012, the total cash costs per ounce are forecast to rise to approximately $655. Both of these levels are considerably higher than the life of mine average due to relatively high stripping ratios in those years.

In 2011,2013, payable gold production at Meadowbank is expected to be approximately 362,000 ounces, reflecting a slower than362,172 ounces. The expected ramp-up to design rates as a result of crushing issues.

A feasibility studymine life is currently underway for the potential construction of an underground exploration ramp at the southern end of the deposit in order to allow exploration below the 500-metre level and south of the Goose pit. Drilling done in 2009 and 2010 on the underground resource increased continuity over a 700-metre strike length and up to 500 metres at depth. Results of the feasibility study are expected in the second quarter of 2011.2018.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            5363

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Meadowbank Mine (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

64            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Surface Plan of the Vault Deposit (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHIC

Meadowbank has three major deposits that have sufficient drilling definition to sustain reserves: Portage, Goose and Vault. By the end of 2009, all of the camp infrastructure (dormitories and kitchen), a mill, a service building shop and generator buildings were built. All required aggregates used in the mining process are produced from waste material taken from the north end of the Portage pit. In 2008, a dewatering dyke was constructed in order to fully access the north half of the Portage pit in preparation for pit development in 2009 in order to have it ready for production in 2010. Construction of the Bay-Goose dyke, a second major dewatering dyke (the Bay-Goose dyke)required to access the southern portion of the Portage and the Goose Island pits, commenced in the summer of 2009 and is expected to bewas completed in Aprilthe spring of 2011. Three tailings impoundment dykes, (SaddleSaddle Dam 1, andSaddle Dam 2 and Stormwater Dykes)Dykes, were also built for the impoundment of tailings in 2009 and 2010. In 2011, the Company will construct an eight-kilometre access road to service the Vault pit and will buildAlso, the first phase of an additional majorthe main tailings impoundment dyke, (Central Dyke), which is requiredCentral Dyke, was started in 2012 and will be in construction for the impoundmentduration of the tailings formine life. The eight-kilometre long access road to the life of the mine. Also, the Company is currently planning, subject to receipt of the required permits, to extend the airstrip to accommodate the landing of a Boeing 737.Vault pit was started in 2011 and completed in 2012.

Mining Methods

Mining at the Meadowbank Minemine is done by open pit with trucks and excavators. OreThe ore is extracted conventionally using drilling and blasting, with truck haulagethen hauled by trucks to a primary gyratory crusher located adjacent to the mill. The marginal-grade material (that is, material(material grading under the cut-off grade at a gold price of $1,000$1,490 per ounce but which has the potential of increasingto increase the reserves at the end of the mine life if the metal prices justify its processing) is stockpiled separately. Also, low-grade material stockpiles (material that has been extracted but currently is lower than the processing of such material)mill feed grade) were created. This low-grade material is separated andprocessed when the mining fronts cannot supply enough material to the mill. Waste rock is hauled to

54            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            65

Table of Contents



stockpiled for future processing. Also, a sub-grade material stockpile (that is, material for which extraction and stockpile has already been paid and currently grades too low to be processed) will be created for potential processing at the end of the mine life. Waste rock is hauled to one of two waste storage areasstorages on the property, used for dyke construction or fillconstruction material or dumpedbackfilled into selective areas of the open pits that have previously been mined out. out area.

Mining will initially be concentratedfirst commenced in the Portage pit area. Waste material from the pre-stripping will be used as bulk construction materials for dykes, as well as for construction fill material around the site.

During pre-production, ore grade material was stockpiled close to the primary crusher. From 2009 through 2013, all of the ore is scheduled to be sourced from the Portage pit. Waste material will be used to complete the construction of the Bay-Goose, Central, Stormwaterin 2010 and 7 Saddle Dam dykes, with the remaining waste hauled to a primary dump north of Second Portage Lake.

With the completion of the Bay-Goose dyke,in the Goose Island pit will be brought into production in 2013. The Company anticipates that these two pits will operate concurrently for a period of two years, from 2013 through 2014. Waste strippingMarch 2012, and is scheduled to commence in the Vault pit in 2014, with the start of ore mining anticipated in 2014 as the Goose Island pit becomes depleted. During the last four years of the current mine life, estimated to begin in 2015, mining will be exclusively from the Vault pit.2014.

Surface Facilities

The accommodations complex at the Meadowbank Minemine consists of a permanent camp with capacity for 364 employees and a temporary camp to accommodate 200 extra workers. The camp is supported with a sewage treatment, solid waste disposal and potable water plant. In 2008, the exploration group was relocated eight kilometres south of the minesite location to a separate camp with an 80-person capacity. A major fire in March 2011 destroyed the kitchen facilities at the Meadowbank mine. New kitchen facilities were built in the summer of 2011 and commissioned in December 2011.

Plant site facilities include a mill building, a maintenance mechanical shop building, a generator building, an assay lab and a heavy vehicle maintenance shop. A structure comprised of two separate crushers will flank the main process complex. Power is supplied by an 29-megawatt diesel electric power generation plant with heat recovery and an onsite fuel storage (five(5.6 million litres) and distribution system. The mill-service-power complex is connected to the accommodations complex by enclosed corridors. In addition, the Company will buildis building peripheral infrastructure including tailings and waste impoundment areas. In January 2012, the Company identified naturally occurring asbestos fibres in dust samples taken from the secondary crusher building at the Meadowbank mine and subsequently found small concentrations of fibres in the ore coming from certain areas of the open pit mines. The Company has instituted additional monitoring and an asbestos management program at the site to ensure that asbestos levels are within applicable territorial, regulatory and industry standards.

Facilities constructed at Baker Lake include a barge landing site located three kilometres east of the community and a storage compound. A fuel storage and distribution complex with a 40-million60-million litre capacity has been built next to the barge landing facility.

In 2013, new facilities will be built near the Vault deposit as a result of the remoteness of this pit (the Vault deposit is located approximately 8 kilometres from the mine complex). The new facilities will include a refuge, a storage area, a fuel farm, an electrical power generation plant and a water treatment plant.

The process design is based on a conventional gold plant flowsheet consisting of two-stage crushing, grinding, gravity concentration, cyanide leaching and gold recovery in a CIP circuit. The mill is designed for year-round operations with a design capacity of 8,5009,800 tonnes per day. The overall gold recovery is projected to be approximately 93.4%92.8%, based on projections from metallurgical test work, with approximately 40%15% typically recovered in the gravity circuit.

The run-of-mine ore is transported to the crusher using an off-road truck. The ore is dumped into the gyratory crusher or into designated ore-type stockpiles. The product from the primary crusher is conveyed to the cone crusher in closed circuit with a vibrating screen. The crushed ore is delivered to the coarse ore stockpile and ore from the stockpile is conveyed to the mill. The grinding circuit is comprised of a primary SAG mill operated in open circuit and a secondary ball mill operated in closed circuit with cyclones. A portion of the cyclone underflow stream is sent to the concentrator, which separates the heavy minerals from the ore. The grinding circuit incorporates a gravity process to recover free gold and the free gold concentrate is leached in an intensive cyanide leach-direct electrowinning recovery process.

The cyclone overflow is sent to the grinding thickener. The clarified overflow is recycled to the grinding circuit and thickened underflow is pumped to a pre-aeration and leach circuit. The cyanide circuit consists of seven tanks providing approximately 42 hours retention time. The leached slurry flows to a train of six CIP tanks. Gold in the solution flowing from the leaching circuit is adsorbed into the activated carbon. Gold is recovered from the carbon in a Zadra elution circuit and is recovered from the solution using an electrowinning recovery process. The gold sludge is then poured into dore bars using an electric induction furnace.

The CIP tailings are treated for the destruction of cyanide using the standard sulphur-dioxide-air process. The detoxified tailings are then pumped to the permanent tailings facility. The tailings storage is designed for zero discharge, with all process water being reclaimed for re-use in the mill to minimize the water requirements.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            55

Table of Contents


Mineral Recoveries

Gold recoveries are expected to average 93.4%92.8% for all deposits. The different ore zones have slightly different grind sensitivities to gold recovery and, as such, different particle size distributions are recommended as target grinds in the

66            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



process. The use of a slightly coarser grind for the Vault ores will allow all three of the ore zones to be processed at a consistent process throughput.

During 2010,2012, gold recovery averaged 93.95%93.91%. Approximately two million3,820,000 tonnes of ore were processed, averaging 6,42210,440 tonnes of ore per day with the mill operating 84%94.1% of available time. The following table sets out the metal recoveries contained for the 2.04 million3,200,000 tonnes of ore extracted at the Meadowbank Minemine in 2010.2012. Mill processing exceeded extraction from the mine in 2012; 346,000 tonnes came from the marginal stockpile and 274,000 tonnes from the low-grade stockpile.

  
  Head
Grade
 Overall
Metal
Recovery
 Payable
Production
 
  








Gold 4.333.18 g/t 93.9%93.91% 265,659366,030 oz 

Environmental Matters (including Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement)

The development of the Meadowbank Minemine was subject to an extensive environmental review process under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement administered by the Nunavut Impact Review Board (the "NIRB"). On December 30, 2006, a predecessor to the Company received the Project Certificate from the NIRB, which includesincluded the terms and conditions to ensure the environmental integrity of the development process. The Nunavut Water Board providedSubsequently, in July 2008, the recommendationCompany received a water licence from the NWB for construction and operation of the mine subject to additional terms and conditions. Both authorizations were approved by the Ministrythen Minister of IndianAboriginal Affairs and Northern Development (Canada) to grant the Meadowbank Mine's construction and operation under a water licence in July 2008.Canada.

In February 2007, a predecessor to the Company and the Nunavut government signed a Development Partnership Agreement (the "DPA") with respect to the Meadowbank Mine.mine. The DPA provides a framework for stakeholders, including the federal and municipal governments and the KIA, to maximize the long-term socio-economic benefits of the Meadowbank Minemine to Nunavut.

An Inuit Impact Benefit AgreementIIBA for the Meadowbank Minemine (the "IIBA""Meadowbank IIBA") was signed with the KIA in March 2006. This agreement was renegotiated and a revised Meadowbank IIBA was signed on October 18, 2011. The Meadowbank IIBA ensures that local employment, training and business opportunities arising from all phases of the project are accessible to the Kivalliq Inuit. The Meadowbank IIBA also outlines the special considerations and compensation that Cumberland agreed to providemust be provided to the Inuit regarding traditional, social and cultural matters.

The Company currently holds a renewable exploration lease from the KIA that expires December 31, 2015. In July 2008, the Company signed a production lease for the construction and the operation of the mine, the mill and all related activities. In April 2008, the Company and the KIA signed a water compensation agreement for the Meadowbank Minemine addressing Inuit rights under the Land Claims Agreement respecting compensation for water use and water impacts associated with the project.

The Meadowbank Minemine consists of severalthree gold-bearing deposits: Portage, Goose and Vault. A series of sixfour dykes have or will bebeen built to isolate the mining activities at the Portage and Goose deposits from neighbouring lakes. An additional dyke will be built in 2013 to isolate the mining activities at the Vault deposit. Waste rock from the Portage, Goose Island and Vault pits will beis primarily stored in the Portage and Vault rock storage facility.facilities, and a portion of the waste is placed in the Portage Pit. The control strategy to minimize the onset of oxidation and the subsequent generation of acid mine drainage includes freeze control of the waste rock through permafrost encapsulation and capping with an insulating convective layer of neutralizing rock (ultramafic and non-acid generating volcanic rocks). The Vault rock storage facility does not require an insulating convective layer due to the non-acid generating nature of the rock in that area. Waste rock deposited in the Portage pit will be covered with water during the closure phase flooding of the pit which will prevent any acid generation. Because the site is underlain by about 450 metres of permafrost, the waste rock below the capping layer is expected to freeze, resulting in low (if any) rates of acid rock drainage generation in the long term.

Tailings are stored in the dewatered portion of the Second Portage arm. Initially theLake. The tailings will be deposited in a subaqueous environment, but the majority of tailings will beare deposited on tailings beaches.beaches within a two cell tailings storage facility. A reclamation pond will be operatedis located within the tailings storage facility. The control strategy to minimize water infiltration into the tailings storage facility and the migration of constituents out of the facility includes freeze control of the tailings through permafrost encapsulation.encapsulation and through comprehensive, engineered dyke

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            67

Table of Contents



liners. A four-metre-thick dry cover of acid neutralizing ultramafic rockfillrock backfill will be placed over the tailings as an insulating convective layer to confine the permafrost active layer within relatively inert tailings materials.

The water management objective for the project is to minimize the potential impact on the quality of surface water and groundwater resources at the site. Diversion ditches will bewere constructed in 2012 to avoid the contact of clean runoff water with areas affected by the mine or mining activities. Contact water originating from affected areas will beis intercepted, collected,

56            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



conveyed to the tailings storage facility or a site attenuation pond for re-use in process or decanted to treatment for removal of solids (if needed) prior to release to receiving lakes.the Third Portage Lake.

Capital Expenditures/Development

A total of $54$86 million has been budgeted to be spent at the Meadowbank Minemine (excluding exploration) in 2011,2013, including $15$55 million on dyke construction, $26$25.6 million on sustaining capital and equipment and $13$1.4 million on construction projects carried over from 2012. As well, $2.2 million has been budgeted to complete 11,500 metres of delineation drilling in the constructionstarter pit and an additional $0.8 million to complete 3,500 metres of a new secondary crushing plant.diamond drilling in the Vault East deposit area in order to define additional resources. It is also expected that there will be 5,000 metres of diamond drilling representing $1 million to continue testing the goose underground structure below the ultimate pit. Regional exploration in the Meadowbank area has been budgeted at $1.8 million and will include 4,000 metres of exploration diamond drilling.

The Meadowbank Minemine started production in 2010. Total capital costs of construction incurred since the date of acquisition by the Company amounted to $721 million.$1.1 billion as at December 31, 2012. The remaining mine life is expected to be tenfive years.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology

The Meadowbank Minemine comprises a number of Archean-age gold deposits hosted within polydeformed volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Woodburn Lake Group, part of the Western Churchill supergroup in northern Canada.

Three minable gold deposits – Goose, Portage and Vault – have been discovered along the 25-kilometre long Meadowbank gold trend, and the PDF deposit (a fourth deposit) has been outlined on the northeast gold trend. These known gold resources are within 225 metres of the surface, making the project amenable to open pit mining.

Mineralization

The predominant gold mineralization found in the Portage and Goose deposits is associated with iron sulfides, mainly pyrite and pyrrhotite, which is foundoccur as a replacement of magnetite in the oxide facies iron formation host rock. To a lesser extent, pyrite and chalcopyrite may be found and, on rare occasions, arsenopyrite may be associated with the other sulphides. Gold is mainly observed in native form (electrum), occurring in isolated specs or as plating around sulfide grains. The mineralization is usually restrictedore zones are typically 6-7 metres wide, following the contacts between the iron formation units and the surrounding host rock. Zones extend up to several hundred metres in length laterally, but vertically may extend to over several hundred metres.along strike and at depth. The sulphides primarily occur as replacement of the primary magnetite layers, as well as narrow stringers or bands of disseminated sulphides that almost always crosscut the main foliation and/or bedding which would imply an epigenetic mode of emplacement. The percentage of sulphides is quite variable and may range from trace to semi-massive amounts over several centimetres to several metres in length. The higher gold grades and the occasional occurrence of visible gold are almost always associated with greater than 20% sulphide content.

The main mineralized banded iron formation unit is bounded by an ultramafic unit to the west which locally occurs interlayered with the banded iron formation and to the east by an intermediate to felsic metavolcaniclastic unit.

In the Vault deposit, pyrite is the principal ore bearingore-bearing sulphide. The disseminated sulphides occur along sheared horizons that have been sericitized and silicified. These zones are several metres wide and may continue for hundreds of metres along strike and down dip.

Three of the four known gold deposits are currently planned to be mined. The Goose Island and Portage deposits are hosted within highly deformed, magnetite-rich iron formation rocks, while intermediate volcanic rock assemblages host the majority of the mineralization at the more northerly Vault deposit. The fourth deposit, PDF, shows the same characteristics as Vault, though it is not currently anticipated to be a mineable deposit.

68            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Defined over a 1.85-kilometre strike length and across lateral extents ranging from 100 to 230 metres, the geometry of the Portage deposit consists of general north-northwest-striking ore zones that are highly folded. The mineralization in the lower limb of the fold is typically six to eight metres in true thickness, reaching up to 20 metres in the hinge area.

The Goose Island deposit is located just south of the Portage deposit and is also associated with iron formation but exhibits different geometry, with a north-south trend and a steep westerly dip. Mineralized zones typically occur as a single unit near surface, splaying into several limbs at depth. The deposit is currently defined over a 750-metre strike length and down to 500 metres at depth (mainly in the southern end), with true thicknesses of three to 12 metres (reaching up to 20 metres locally). The Goose underground resource (100 to 500 metres at depth) extends 700 metres to the south of the Goose pit. The ore zones show the same characteristics as the Goose pit, which is two to five main zones sub-parallel and undulating. The average thickness rarely exceeds three to five metres.

The Vault deposit is located seven kilometres northeast of the Portage and Goose deposits. It is planar and shallow-dipping with a defined strike of 1,100 metres. The deposit has been disturbed by two sets of normal faults striking east-west and north-south and dipping moderately to the southeast and steeply to the east, respectively. The main lens has an average true thickness of eight to 12 metres, reaching as high as 18 metres locally. The hanging wall lenses are typically three to five metres, and up to seven metres, in true thickness.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            57

Table of Contents


Exploration

Grass rootsGrassroots exploration in the project area began as early as 1980. As some interesting targets arose, severalSeveral companies conducted various types of work between 1980 and 2007. Throughout these years, six deposits were the main focus of exploration: Portage, Cannu, Bay Zone, Goose, Vault and PDF. Over time, the Cannu, Bay Zone and Portage deposits were combined into one mineable deposit referred to as Portage. Exploration has extended the Goose Island deposit southward, adding the Goose South and Gosling zones.

In 2009, the mine exploration group took over the pit and adjacent areas. Three goals were targeted: exploration drilling, resource conversion and waste pad condemnation.

Diamond drilling is used for exploration at Meadowbank. In 2010, the102 holes totalling 37,928 metres were drilled. The focus of minethe exploration campaign was on testing the underground potential atof the Goose deposit, resource conversions at the Vault deposit and on the south continuity atof the Portage and Goose deposits. On the Goose underground deposit, a total of 3223 holes for 17,57011,145 metres were drilled from 200 to 750 metres in depth. These holes greatly increasedcontributed to increase the continuity and understanding of the mineralization distribution. On the Vault deposit, a total of 39 holes for 5,943 metres were drilled from 25 to 200 metres in depth. These holes were aimed at converting resources close to the pit shell and also to extending resources to the south-west continuity towards the Turn Lake porphyry. On the southern portion of the Portage deposit, a total of 18 holes for 7,408 metres were drilled from 50 to 250 metres in depth with the aim of converting resources directly south of Portage pit and other inferred occurrences within a close proximity to the pit. On the Goose south trend, a total of 13 holes for 7,320 metres were drilled from 150 to 250 metres in depth. These holes were aimed at following the south trend of the Portage-Goose iron formation.

In 2010, 113 holes totalling 29,822 metres were drilled at Meadowbank.mineralization. The drilling was predominantly to expand the Goose deposit at depth and towards the south, as well as to conduct infill drilling in areas where large gaps occurred between auriferous intersections. The program was successful in expanding the Goose deposit at depth and towards the south.

ForOn the Vault deposit, a total of 39 holes for 5,943 metres were drilled from 25 to 200 metres in depth during 2010. These holes were aimed at converting resources close to the pit shell and also to extending resources to the south-west continuity towards the Tern Lake porphyry.

On the southern portion of the Portage deposit, a total of 18 holes for 8,070 metres were drilled from 50 to 250 metres in depth during 2010, with the aim of converting resources directly south of the Portage pit and other inferred occurrences within a close proximity to the pit.

On the Goose south trend, a total of 13 holes for 7,320 metres were drilled from 150 to 250 metres in depth during 2010. These holes were aimed at following the south trend of the Portage Goose iron formation.

In 2011, the mine284 diamond drill holes totalling 24,229 metres were drilled. The exploration program hashad four main goals: exploring the southern trend of the Goose deposit at depth; exploring the Goose underground deposit towards the south to extend resources; following-up on the regional results of testing on the far west iron formationFarwest Iron Formation and the geophysics of the TurnTern Lake porphyry completed in 2010; and continuing resource conversion work initiated on the Vault deposit in 2010. 2010 and extending resources on the south west part of deposit; and a resources conversion with a definition program in Portage pit.

The definition program will be completedon the Portage pit was conducted in phases from May to December 2011 and represented 165 holes totalling 11,431 metres of diamond drilling. In addition, reverse circulation drilling was used to drill over 42 holes totalling 1,074 metres. This method is expected to reduce the cost of drilling.

On the Goose South trend, 6 holes totalling 2,382 metres were drilled during 2011. On the Farwest Iron Formation, 7 holes for a total of 2,721 metres were drilled along the trend and verified the potential of the west contact with the granitic mass. On the Tern Lake porphyry, 19 holes totalling 931 metres were drilled.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            69

Table of Contents


At the Vault pit during 2011, 19 holes were drilled for a total of 1,250 metres, 43 holes totalling 3,545 metres were drilled in Vault South and 25 holes totalling 1,969 metres were drilled in Vault East.

In 2012, 517 diamond and reverse circulation drill holes totalling 28,052 metres were drilled. Exploration focused on delineation and infill drilling on the Portage and Goose pits and resource conversion, definition and condemnation drilling at Vault. In addition, two deep exploration holes were drilled to follow up on earlier testing of the north and south extension of the Portage main structure.

The delineation drilling program on the Portage pit was conducted throughout the year with a break between June and September while waiting for the reverse circulation drill to arrive by sealift. A total of 134 reverse circulation holes in 3,254 metres and 205 diamond drill holes in 11,304 metres were drilled in the north pit and south pit, including the Pushback area. The drilling program resulted in the completion of a 25x25 metre grid over the entire pit and the commencement of a 12.5x12.5 metre infill grid.

At the Goose Island pit, 1,902 metres in 7 reverse circulation holes and 3,347 metres in 74 diamond drill holes were drilled in 2012. The diamond drill holes were drilled in January and June 2011.February, primarily to complete the 25x25 metre delineation grid in the pit. The reverse circulation holes were drilled in selected areas on a 12.5x12.5 metre grid in October and November 2012.

At the Vault project, 3,441 metres in 70 diamond drill holes were drilled between mid-February and early April 2012 to partially complete the delineation program (25x25 metre grid) within the starter pit. Additional drilling to complete this program is planned for 2013. A condemnation drilling program for the waste storage facility was also completed by early April 2012, with 3,777 metres drilled in 25 holes.

Drilling carried out induring the period of 2009 and 2010to 2012 returned significant results on the Goose underground and Vault deposits. At the Goose underground deposit, the increase in indicated mineral resources comes from a confirmation of continuity towards the south and at depth. At the Vault deposit, the increase in mineral reserves is the result of converting resources to reserves at depth along the east pit wall. Positive drill results show continuity of mineralization toward the southwest indicating thatwhere reserves have been defined in what is currently called the pit can be expanded in that direction.Phaser pit.

Meliadine Project

The Meliadine project is an advanced exploration property located near the western shore of Hudson Bay in the Kivalliq region of Nunavut, about 25 kilometres north of the hamlet of Rankin Inlet and 290 kilometres southeast of the Meadowbank Mine.mine. The closest major city is Winnipeg, Manitoba, about 1,500 kilometres to the south.

Agnico-EagleThe Company acquired its 100% interest in the Meliadine project through its acquisition of Comaplex in July 2010 (see "– History and Development of the Company").

The mineral reserves and resources of the Meliadine project are estimated at December 31, 2010,2012 to contain proven and probable mineral reserves of 2.63.0 million ounces of gold comprised of 9.47in 13.3 million tonnes of ore grading 8.547.0 grams per tonne. In addition, the project has 8.8had 17.2 million tonnes of indicated mineral resources grading 5.213.9 grams of gold per tonne and 11.814.8 million tonnes of inferred mineral resources grading 6.946.2 grams of gold per tonne.tonne at December 31, 2012.

The Meliadine property is a large, almost entirely contiguous land package that is nearly 80 kilometres long. It consists of 52,17365,499 hectares of mineral rights, of which 51,28562,069 hectares are held under the Canada Mining Regulations and administered by the Department of IndianAboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada and referred to as Crown Land. The Crown Land is made up of mining claims covering 88710,783 hectares and mineral leases covering 51,28551,286 hectares. There are also 3,7193,430 hectares of subsurface Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. concessions administered by a division of the Nunavut Territorial government. In 2012, C$126,734 was paid to Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada for the mining lease; Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. requires annual rental fees of C$13,721 and exploration expenditures of C$102,909.

The Kivalliq region has an arid arctic climate. The Meliadine property is mainly covered by glacial overburden with the presence of deep-seated permafrost. The property is about 60 metres above sea level in low-lying topography with numerous lakes. Surface waters are usually frozen by early October and remain frozen until early June. Surface geological

58            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



work can be carried out from mid-May to mid-October, while exploration drilling can take place throughout the year, though is reduced in JanuaryDecember and FebruaryJanuary due to cold and darkness.

Equipment, fuel and dry goods are transported on the annual warm-weather sealift by barge to Rankin Inlet via Hudson Bay. Ocean-going barges from Churchill, Manitoba or eastern Canadian ports can access the community from late June to early October. Churchill, which is approximately 470 kilometres south of Rankin Inlet, has a deep-water port facility and a year-round rail link to locations to the south.

70            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Personnel, perishables and lighter goods arrive at the Rankin Inlet regional airport by commercial or charter airline, from which they can be flown to the property by chartered helicopter. An all-weather gravel road extends from Rankin Inlet to the Meliadine River, approximately 15 kilometres away from the property, but there is winter-road access forhelicopter or delivered by tracked vehicles by a winter-road from Rankin Inlet directly to the Meliadine project exploration camp from late DecemberJanuary to mid-May. TheIn 2011, the Company proposessubmitted an application to buildthe NIRB and other regulatory agencies proposing the building of a 27.4-kilometre long open access23.8-kilometre-long all-weather gravel road (including three bridges) linking Rankin Inlet with the project site to support ongoing exploration activities at the underground program. AMeliadine project descriptionproperty. Approval from the NIRB on the application was received in February 2012 and a water license from the NWB was received in March 2012. Construction of the road was submitted to the NIRBbegan in January 2011. It proposes the continuationMarch 2012. As at December 31, 2012, 11.5 kilometres of the existing road from Char River to the project site, with a small section being built to the edgeand all three of the Meliadine Lake nearbridges had been completed. The construction of the Discovery deposit. This road would potentiallyis expected to be built in 2011 and 2012.completed by mid-2013.

Exploration personnel for the Meliadine project are mainly sourced from other parts of Canada on a fly-in/fly-out rotation from Val d'Or, Quebec, and Winnipeg, Manitoba, approximately 1,500 kilometres south of the Meliadine property, although there is preferential employment of qualified people from the Kivalliq region. The hamlet of Rankin Inlet has developed a strong taskforce of entrepreneurs thatwho provide a wide variety of services, such as freight expediting, equipment supply and outfitting.

Location Map of the Meliadine Project (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            5971

Table of Contents


Mining and Milling Facilities

Surface Plan of the Meliadine Project (as at December 31, 2012)

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Facilities

Current facilities atinclude the Meliadine project include the Meliadine exploration camp located on the shore of Meliadine Lake, approximately 2.3 kilometres northeast of the Tiriganiaq deposit. The self-contained camp is constructedconsists of Weatherhaven tents andfour wings of new trailers that can accommodate up to 80 personnel. Covered wooden walkways connect all tents200 personnel and includes new kitchen facilities, complete with diesel generators. These new facilities replaced the previous tent exploration camp.

As described above, construction of an all-weather access road linking Rankin Inlet to the washroomsMeliadine site began in March 2012 and kitchen facilities. A 100-person, self-contained trailer camp, complete with two diesel generators, willis expected to be installed adjacent to the existing exploration camp in early 2011.completed by mid-2013.

Power is currently generated using diesel generators for the Meliadine exploration camp on an as-required basis. Potable water for the Meliadine project camp is pumped from Meliadine Lake and water for the previous underground operations and surface drill programmesprograms is pumped from Pump Lake. The current water licence allows for a maximum daily water use of 290 cubic metres (Meliadine West), while a request for an amendment toon the waterMeliadine West licence was filed in October 2010 with the Nunavut Water Board (Meliadine East) to increase water use toand 299 cubic metres per day.on the Meliadine East licence.

72            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The Meliadine project exploration camp has an incinerator on site to burn all flammable materials, such as camp and food wastes. Plastics and metal objects, along with incinerator ash, are set aside for transport to be disposed of in the Rankin Inlet landfill. All hazardous and liquid wastes are held at the Meliadine project site for transport to a waste management company in southern Canada.

60            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Sewage has been treated through a Biodisk treatment system since the summer of 2010. Run-off water is contained in the primary water containment area and released only when sampling results meet acceptable water quality standards. Routine water sampling has been conducted since the mid-1990s and reported annuallyon a monthly basis to the authorities.

The Meliadine East camp on Atulik Lake was decommissioned during the summer of 2010, with completion in the winter of 2010 and 2011. The core shack and storage building remain at the former camp site.

An underground portal allowing access to an exploration decline was built at the Tiriganiaq deposit in 2007 and 2008 in order to extract a bulk sample for study purposes. A waste rock and ore storage pad was generated during excavation of the decline and a sampling tower was installed for processing the bulk sample. There is a two-kilometretwo-kilometre-long road between the Meliadine project exploration camp and the portal site.

Another underground bulk sample of 4,600 tonnes of ore was taken from the Tiriganiaq deposit via this portal in 2011. The feasibility studyresults confirmed the resource estimation model that is underway is considering, among other things,has been developed for the locationtwo principal zones (Zones 1000 and 1100) at Tiriganiaq, and in fact indicated approximately 6% more gold than had been predicted by the block model for these areas. The 2011 bulk sample program also confirmed the previous assessment of potential open pitthe Company's block model in terms of grade continuity, consistency and distribution, and the evaluation of related mining properties through geological mapping, underground mines, ore storage areas, a mineral processing plant sitechip-, channel- and tailings storagemuck-sampling, and waste rock disposal areas.geotechnical observations.

Environmental Matters (including Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement)IIBA)

Land and environmental management in the region of the Meliadine project is generally governed by the provisions of the NunavutLand Claims Agreement. Pursuant to the Land Claims Agreement, ("NLCA"). Pursuant to the NLCA, land use leases must be obtained from the KIA. The Meliadine project has been granted a commercial lease for exploration and underground development activity, a prospecting and land use lease for exploration and development activities, an exploration land use lease for exploration and drilling on the Inuit-owned lands of Meliadine East and a parcel drilling permit for drilling activity on Inuit-owned lands. A number of right-of-way leases covering road access to the Meliadine project property and esker quarrying on the Inuit-owned lands were also granted by the KIA.

Pursuant to the NLCA,Land Claims Agreement, an exploration water licence and a bulk sample water licence were granted by the Nunavut Water Board (the "NWB"). An application was made to the NIRB and the NWB for the construction of an access road to the Meliadine camp to be able to carry out the exploration program year-round.

in March 2012. A Project Certificateproject certificate from the NIRB is the next approval required byfor the Meliadine project. In connection therewith, the NIRB issued guidelines to the Company in February 2012 for the preparation of an environmental impact statement ("EIS") for the Meliadine project. The Company submitted a draft EIS to the NIRB for review in January 2013. The Company received comments from the NIRB regarding the draft EIS and expects to resubmit the draft EIS to the NIRB in April 2013. Upon completion of a public and technical review, a final EIS will be submitted to the NIRB and the Company expects to be granted a project certificate in mid-2014.

Other operating permits and licences can only be issued after such Project Certificatea project certificate is received.received from the NIRB. An Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement andIIBA, an Inuit Water Compensation Agreement and a Production Lease will also need to be negotiated withbetween the Company and the KIA.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            61

Table of Contents


Negotiations regarding an IIBA between the Company and KIA commenced in January 2012.

Geology, Mineralization and Exploration

Geology and Mineralization

Archean volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the Meliadine greenstone belt underlie the property, which is mainly covered by glacial overburden with deep-seated permafrost and is part of the Western Churchill supergroup in northern Canada. The rock layers have been folded, sheared and metamorphosed, and have been truncated by the Pyke Fault, a regional structure that extends the entire 80-kilometre length of the large property.

The Pyke Fault appears to control gold mineralization on the Meliadine project property. At the southern edge of the fault is a series of oxide iron formations that host all sixthe seven Meliadine project deposits currently known. The deposits consist of multiple lodes of mesothermal quartz-vein stockworks, laminated veins and sulphidized iron formation mineralization with strike lengths of up to three kilometres. The Upper Oxide iron formation hosts the Tiriganiaq and Wolf North zones. The two Lower Lean iron formations contain the F Zone, Pump, Wolf Main and Wesmeg deposits. The Normeg zone was discovered in 2011 on the eastern end of the Wesmeg zone, near Tiriganiaq. The Wolf (North and Main), F Zone, Pump and Wesmeg/Normeg deposits which are all within five kilometres of Tiriganiaq. The Discovery deposit is 17 kilometres east

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            73

Table of Contents



southeast of Tiriganiaq and is hosted by the Upper Oxide iron formation. Each of these deposits has mineralization within 120 metres of surface, making them potentially mineable by open pit methods. They also have deeper ore that could potentially be mined with underground methods.methods, which is being examined in the feasibility study.

Exploration

The Meliadine property has beenwas explored for gold from 1987 through 2010 at a cost of C$166.8 million by former owners Asamera Inc., Rio Algom Limited, Comaplex, Cumberland and Western Mining International, as well as the Company and numerous reputable consultants. For many years the property was divided into two halves – Meliadine East and Meliadine West – which were consolidated into the Meliadine property in December 2009. A detailed history of exploration on the property is given in a technical report by the Company posted on SEDAR on March 8, 2011.

Lack of outcropping bedrock in the area resulted in the use of high-density magnetic surveying followed by diamond drilling as the most common and successful exploration strategy on the property. This has included 193,318 metres of drilling in 682 holes from 1993 through 2010, as well as geophysical surveying, prospecting and sampling. In 2007 and 2008, there was an underground exploration and bulk sample program on the Tiriganiaq deposit. This was followed by a Preliminary Assessmentpreliminary assessment for the property in 2009, which indicated the potential of the project to support a mining operation.

In 2010, there were 128 exploration drill holes (32,000 metres) at the Meliadine project, of which 53% were drilled by the Company after acquiring the property in July 2010. Agnico-EagleThe Company spent $10 million on exploration from July through December 2010.

The Company initiated a $62an exploration and development program in the summer of 2010. Approximately 300,000 metres of drilling was completed by the end of 2012 to convert and extend the known mineral resources to reserves. This drilling was primarily carried out at Tiriganiaq, but also took place at other known mineralized zones. At the end of 2012, the Company had spent $150.2 million, broken down as follows: $45.7 million on exploration diamond drilling, program in February 2011. Approximately 200,000$30.7 million on construction and equipment purchases (camp and road), $30.4 million on site services, transportation and accommodation, $11.6 million on environmental expenses and permitting, $11.3 million on underground work and equipment purchases, $11.0 million on administration and technical services, $6.5 million on a bulk sample and $3.0 million on studies. In 2013, a total of $91 million is budgeted on the project, including $15 million for a feasibility study, $6 million for permitting activities, $13 million for site infrastructure, $13 million for exploration ramp development, $15.9 million for camp operations and logisitics and $13.8 million for 55,000 metres of conversion and exploration drilling within the known deposits. An additional $10.4 million is planned through early 2013, mainly to convert mineral resources to reserves at Tiriganiaq. Another $68 million has been budgeted through early 2013 to complete an underground bulk sample,for 35,000 metres of regional exploration drilling outside of the known deposits.

A feasibility study permittingcompleted in 2011 confirmed the viability of the Meliadine project at an operating rate of 3,000 tonnes per day. Internal studies that incorporate the recent exploration results are currently underway looking to increase project throughput and improve the constructionrate of an all-weather road linking the project to Rankin Inlet.return.

Regional Exploration Activities

During 2010,2012, the Company continued to actively explore in Quebec, Ontario, Nunavut, Nevada, Finland, Sweden, Mexico and Argentina. The Canadian exploration activities were focused on the Ellison/BousquetGoldex, Wyoming, Maritime and Maritime/Lapa mining campsproperties in Quebec, as well as on the Meadowbank property in Nunavut where activities were conducted both within and outside the mining lease and the newly acquired Meliadine project, also in Nunavut. In the United States, exploration activities during 20102012 were concentrated on the West Pequop and Summit projects located in northeast Nevada and the Rattlesnake project located in northeast Nevada.Wyoming. At the LaRonde, Goldex, Lapa, Pinos Altos and Kittila Mines,mines, the Company continued aggressive exploration programs around the current mines. Most of the exploration budget was spent on drilling programs near the mine infrastructure along previously recognized gold trends.

At the end of 2010,2012, the Company's land holdings in Canada consisted of 7869 projects comprised of 2,9112,748 mineral titles covering an aggregate of 222,825220,060 hectares. Land holdings in the United States consisted of 11four properties comprised of 3,0582,620 mineral titles covering an aggregate of 26,17621,585 hectares. Land holdings in Finland consisted of three groups of properties comprised of 136289 mineral titles covering an aggregate of 11,94925,654 hectares. Land holdings in Sweden consisted of one project comprised of seven mineral titles covering an aggregate of 8,957 hectares. Land holdings in Mexico consisted of threeeight projects comprised of 43116 mining concession titles covering an aggregate of 58,340129,258 hectares. Land holdings in Argentina consisted of one project with two mineral titles covering an aggregate of 2,691 hectares.

6274            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The total amount spent on regional exploration in 20102012 was $48.2$76.8 million, which included drilling 500860 holes for an aggregate of approximately 125237 kilometres. The budget for regional exploration expenditures in 20112013 is approximately $101$52.1 million, including approximately 214142.8 kilometres of drilling.

Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources

This section uses the terms "measured mineral resources" and "indicated mineral resources". Investors are advised that while these terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them.Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into mineral reserves.

Cautionary Note to Investors Concerning Estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources

This section uses the term "inferred mineral resources". Investors are advised that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it. "Inferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that any part or all of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Information on Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources of the Company

The preparation of the information set forthout below with respect to the mineral reserves at the LaRonde, Mine (which includes mineral reserves at the LaRonde Mine extension), the Goldex, Lapa, Kittila, Pinos Altos and Meadowbank Minesmines, the Goldex and La India mine projects and the Meliadine projectand Bousquet projects has been supervised by Daniel Doucet, P.Eng., the Company's Vice-President, ProjectCorporate Director, Reserve Development Marc Legault, P.Eng,of the Company, a "qualified person" as that term is defined in NI 43-101. The Company's mineral reserves estimate was derived from internally generated data or geology reports. All of the Company's reserve and resource estimates have been audited reports.by independent consultants.

The criteria set forthout in NI 43-101 for reserve definitions and guidelines for classification of mineral reservereserves are similar to those used by Guide 7. However, the definitions in NI 43-101 differ in certain respects from those under Guide 7. Under Guide 7, among other things, a mineral reserve estimate must have a "final" or "bankable" feasibility study. Guide 7 also requires the use of commodity prices that reflect current economic conditions at the time of reserve determination, which Staff of the SEC has interpreted to mean historic three-year average prices. In addition to the differences noted above, Guide 7 does not recognize mineral resources.

The assumptions used for the 2012 mineral reserves and resources estimates for the Lapa, Goldex, Meadowbank, Meliadine and Creston Mascota properties reported by the Company in this Form 20-F were based on three-year average prices for the period ending December 31, 2012 of $1,490 per ounce of gold, $29.00 per ounce of silver, $0.95 per pound of zinc, $3.67 per pound of copper, $1.00 per pound of lead and exchange rates of C$1.00 per $1.00, 12.75 Mexican pesos per $1.00 and $1.34 per €1.00. The assumptions used for the 2012 mineral reserves and resources estimates for the LaRonde, Kittila, Pinos Altos, La India and Tarachi properties reported by the Company in this Form 20-F used more conservative metal price assumptions of $1,345 per ounce of gold, $25.00 per ounce of silver, $0.95 per pound of zinc, $3.49 per pound of copper, $0.99 per pound of lead and exchange rates of C$1.00 per $1.00, 13.00 Mexican pesos per $1.00 and $1.30 per €1.00. The assumptions used for the 2011 mineral reserves and resources estimate reported by the Company in this Form 20-F were based on three-year average prices for the period ending December 31, 2011 of $1,255 per ounce of gold, $23.00 per ounce of silver, $0.91 per pound of zinc, $3.25 per pound of copper, $0.95 per pound of lead and exchange rates of C$1.05 per $1.00, 12.86 Mexican pesos per $1.00 and $1.37 per €1.00. The assumptions used for the 2010 mineral reserves and resources estimate reported by the Company in this Form 20-F were based on three-year average prices for the period ending December 31, 2010 of $1,024 per ounce gold, $16.62 per ounce silver, $0.86 per pound zinc, $2.97 per pound copper, $0.90 per pound lead and exchange rates of C$1.08 per $1.00, 12.43 Mexican pesos per $1.00 and $1.40 per €1.00. The assumptions used for the 2009 mineral reserves and resources estimate used by the Company in this Form 20-F were based on three-year average prices for the period ending December 31, 2009 of $848 per ounce gold, $14.35 per ounce silver, $1.03 per pound zinc, $3.15 per pound copper, $0.97 per pound lead and exchange rates of C$1.09 per $1.00, 11.00 Mexican pesos per $1.00 and $1.37 per €1.00. The assumptions used for the 2008 mineral reserves and resources estimate reported by the Company in this Form 20-F were based on three-year average prices for the period ending December 31, 2008 of $725 per ounce gold, $13.32 per ounce silver, $1.27 per pound zinc, $3.15 per pound copper and exchange rates of C$1.09 per $1.00, 11.00 Mexican pesos per $1.00 and $1.37 per €1.00. Other assumptions used for estimating 20092011 and 20082010 mineral reserve and resource information may be found in the Company's annual filings in respect of the years ended December 31, 20092011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            6375

Table of Contents



December 31, 2008, respectively. Set out below are the reserve estimates as of December 31, 2012, as calculated in accordance with NI 43-101 and Guide 7, respectively (tonnages and contained gold quantities are rounded to the nearest thousand):

  National Instrument 43-101 Industry Guide No. 7 
  
 
Property Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Proven Reserves             

LaRonde (underground)

 

4,838,000

 

2.36

 

366,000

 

4,838,000

 

2.36

 

366,000

 

Goldex (underground) 14,804,000 1.87 890,000 14,804,000 1.87 890,000 

Kittila (open pit) 395,000 4.19 53,000 395,000 4.19 53,000 

Kittila (underground) 8,000 6.00 2,000 8,000 6.00 2,000 

Kittila total proven 403,000 4.23 55,000 403,000 4.23 55,000 

Lapa (underground) 1,122,000 7.24 261,000 1,122,000 7.24 261,000 

Pinos Altos (open pit) 1,078,000 0.89 31,000 1,078,000 0.89 31,000 

Pinos Altos (underground) 1,786,000 2.52 144,000 1,786,000 2.52 144,000 

Pinos Altos total proven 2,864,000 1.90 175,000 2,864,000 1.90 175,000 

Meadowbank (open pit) 839,000 3.13 85,000 839,000 3.13 85,000 

Total Proven Reserves 24,870,000 2.29 1,832,000 24,870,000 2.29 1,832,000 

Probable Reserves             

LaRonde (underground) 29,892,000 4.63 4,452,000 29,892,000 4.63 4,452,000 

Goldex (underground) 12,990,000 1.62 676,000 12,990,000 1.62 676,000 

Kittila (open pit) 1,657,000 5.28 281,000 1,657,000 5.28 281,000 

Kittila (underground) 30,672,000 4.61 4,544,000 30,672,000 4.61 4,544,000 

Kittila total probable 32,329,000 4.64 4,825,000 32,329,000 4.64 4,825,000 

Lapa (underground) 1,709,000 7.56 416,000 1,709,000 7.56 416,000 

Meliadine (open pit) 4,287,000 6.91 953,000 4,287,000 6.91 953,000 

Meliadine (underground) 5,180,000 9.89 1,647,000 5,180,000 9.89 1,647,000 

Meliadine total probable 9,467,000 8.54 2,600,000 9,467,000 8.54 2,600,000 

Pinos Altos (open pit) 16,987,000 1.98 1,083,000 16,987,000 1.98 1,083,000 

Pinos Altos (underground) 24,311,000 2.58 2,013,000 24,311,000 2.58 2,013,000 

Pinos Altos total probable 41,298,000 2.33 3,096,000 41,298,000 2.33 3,096,000 

Meadowbank (open pit) 33,259,000 3.18 3,402,000 33,259,000 3.18 3,402,000 

Total Probable Reserves 160,944,000 3.76 19,467,000 160,944,000 3.76 19,467,000 

Total Proven and Probable Reserves 185,814,000 3.57 21,299,000 185,814,000 3.57 21,299,000 

  National Instrument 43-101 Industry Guide No. 7
  
 
Property Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 

Proven Reserves             

LaRonde mine (underground) 6,323,000 2.96 602,000 6,323,000 2.96 602,000 

Lapa mine (underground) 1,129,000 6.25 227,000 1,129,000 6.25 227,000 

Goldex mine project (underground) 59,000 1.70 3,000 59,000 1.70 3,000 

Kittila mine (open pit) 272,000 4.30 38,000 272,000 4.30 38,000 

Kittila mine (underground) 1,189,000 4.66 178,000 1,189,000 4.66 178,000 

Kittila mine total proven 1,461,000 4.59 216,000 1,461,000 4.59 216,000 

Pinos Altos mine (open pit) 457,000 0.93 14,000 457,000 0.93 14,000 

Pinos Altos mine (underground) 2,610,000 2.82 237,000 2,610,000 2.82 237,000 

Pinos Altos mine total proven 3,067,000 2.54 250,000 3,067,000 2.54 250,000 

Meadowbank mine (open pit) 1,764,000 1.56 88,000 1,764,000 1.56 88,000 

Meliadine project (open pit) 34,000 7.31 8,000 34,000 7.31 8,000 

Total Proven Reserves 13,836,000 3.13 1,394,000 13,836,000 3.13 1,394,000 

Probable Reserves             

LaRonde mine (underground) 22,462,000 4.99 3,604,000 22,462,000 4.99 3,604,000 

Bousquet (open pit) 2,943,000 1.88 178,000 2,943,000 1.88 178,000 

Lapa mine (underground) 939,000 5.58 168,000 939,000 5.58 168,000 

Goldex mine project (underground) 6,936,000 1.55 346,000 6,936,000 1.55 346,000 

Kittila mine (open pit) 182,000 3.51 21,000 182,000 3.51 21,000 

Kittila mine (underground) 31,480,000 4.49 4,547,000 31,480,000 4.49 4,547,000 

Kittila mine total probable 31,662,000 4.49 4,567,000 31,662,000 4.49 4,567,000 

Pinos Altos mine (open pit) 15,692,000 1.75 884,000 15,692,000 1.75 884,000 

Pinos Altos mine (underground) 19,382,000 2.54 1,580,000 19,382,000 2.54 1,580,000 

Pinos Altos mine total probable 35,074,000 2.18 2,464,000 35,074,000 2.18 2,464,000 

La India mine project (open pit) 33,457,000 0.72 776,000 33,457,000 0.72 776,000 

Meadowbank mine (open pit) 23,560,000 2.91 2,206,000 23,560,000 2.91 2,206,000 

Meliadine project (open pit) 5,172,000 5.85 973,000 5,172,000 5.85 973,000 

Meliadine project (underground) 8,094,000 7.71 2,006,000 8,094,000 7.71 2,006,000 

Meliadine project total probable 13,266,000 6.98 2,979,000 13,266,000 6.98 2,979,000 

Total Probable Reserves 170,300,000 3.16 17,286,000 170,300,000 3.16 17,286,000 

Total Proven and Probable Reserves 184,136,000 3.16 18,681,000 184,136,000 3.16 18,681,000 

76            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


In the following tables setting out mineral reserve information about the Company's mineral projects, tonnage information is rounded to the nearest thousand tonnes and the total contained gold ounces stated do not include equivalent gold ounces for byproduct metals contained in the mineral reservereserve. For all reserves and resources other than inferred mineral resources, the reported metal grades in the estimates represent in-place grades and do not reflect losses in the recovery process, that is, the metallurgical losses associated with processing the extracted ore. The mineral reserve and mineral resource figures presented in this Form 20-F are estimates, and no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades will be achieved or that the indicated level of recovery will be realized.

64            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


LaRonde Mine Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

 As at December 31,
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
Gold-Rich OrebodyGold-Rich Orebody       
 As at December 31, 
 
Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 5,300,000 4,100,000 3,200,000 
 2010 2009 2008 
 
Average grade – gold grams per tonne 3.30 3.10 3.07 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold       

Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

3,200,000

 

2,700,000

 

2,300,000

 


Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 21,800,000 26,700,000 27,900,000 
Average grade – gold grams per tonne 3.07 3.37 3.95 

Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 27,900,000 26,500,000 26,500,000 


Average grade – gold grams per tonne 5.11 4.91 4.90 
Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.90 5.16 5.23 

Zinc       
Gold-Poor OrebodyGold-Poor Orebody       

Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 1,600,000 2,100,000 1,800,000 


Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,600,000 
Average grade – gold grams per tonne 0.95 1.03 1.19 

Probable – tonnes 2,000,000 3,100,000 5,200,000 


Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.23 0.97 0.95 
Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.01 0.99 0.94 


Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 700,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 


Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.11 1.22 1.01 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 34,700,000 34,400,000 35,800,000 Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 28,800,000 33,200,000 34,700,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.32 4.39 4.32 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.54 4.40 4.32 

Total contained gold ounces 4,818,000 4,849,000 4,974,000 Total contained gold ounces 4,206,000 4,700,000 4,818,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 20102012 proven and probable mineral reserves set forthout in the table above are based on a net smelter return cut-off value of the ore that varies between C$71.0088 per tonne and C$80.00118 per tonne depending on the deposit. The Company's historical metallurgical recovery rates at the LaRonde Minemine from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 20102012 averaged 90.0%90.7% for gold, 88.2%87.0% for silver, 81.1%81.6% for zinc 88.6%and 86.4% for copper and 21.8%copper. The historical metallurgical recovery rate for lead.lead from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012 was 15.4%. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 0.5%0.9% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010,2012, the LaRonde Minemine contained indicated mineral resources of 6.9 million5,432,000 tonnes grading 1.891.88 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 11.5 million11,887,000 tonnes grading 3.723.73 grams of gold per tonne.

(3)
The following table shows the reconciliation of mineral reserves (in nearest thousand tonnes) at the LaRonde Minemine by category at December 31, 20102012 with those at December 31, 2009.2011. Revision means additional mineral reserves converted from mineral resources or other categories of mineral reserves and mineral reserves added from exploration activities during 2010.2012.
 
  
  Proven Probable Total 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 2009 4,755 29,625 34,380 

Mined in 2010 2,592 0 2,592 

Revision 2,675 267 2,942 

December 31, 2010 4,838 29,892 34,729 

  
  Proven Probable Total  
  

December 31, 2011 5,331 27,901 33,232  

Processed in 2012 2,359  2,359  

Revision 3,351 (5,439)(2,087) 

December 31, 2012 6,323 22,462 28,786  

(4)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the LaRonde Minemine may be found in the Technical Report on the 2005 LaRonde Mineral Resource & Mineral Reserve Estimate filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDARthe System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval ("SEDAR") on March 23, 2005.

(5)
At December 31, 2012, the Bousquet project contained probable mineral reserves of 2,943,000 tonnes grading 1.88 grams of gold per tonne. In addition, the Bousquet project contained indicated mineral resources of 9,805,000 tonnes grading 2.44 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 4,567,000 tonnes grading 4.04 grams of gold per tonne.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            6577

Table of Contents


GoldexLapa Mine Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

 As at December 31, 
 
 As at December 31,
 2010 2009 2008   
 
 2012 2011 2010 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
GoldGold       Gold       



Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

14,804,000

 

5,217,000

 

434,000

 
Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 1,129,000 1,044,000 1,122,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.87 2.02 1.95 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 6.25 6.45 7.24 

Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 12,990,000 19,524,000 23,391,000 Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 939,000 1,340,000 1,709,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.62 2.06 2.05 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 5.58 6.61 7.56 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnesTotal proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 27,794,000 24,741,000 23,825,000 Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 2,068,000 2,384,000 2,831,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonneAverage grade – gold grams per tonne 1.75 2.05 2.05 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 5.95 6.54 7.43 

Total contained gold ouncesTotal contained gold ounces 1,566,000 1,630,000 1,571,000 Total contained gold ounces 395,000 501,000 677,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 2010 proven and probable2012 mineral reservesreserve estimates were estimatedcalculated using an assumed metallurgical gold recovery of 92.2%. Mining costs were estimated to be C$20.21 per tonne. The71% and a cut-off grade used for mineral reserves was between 0.7of 3.9 grams of gold per tonne, and 0.9the resource estimates were calculated using an assumed metallurgical gold recovery of 75% and a cut-off grade of 2.8 grams of gold per tonne. The operating cost per tonne depending onestimate for the zone.Lapa mine in 2012 was C$131.71. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in noan approximate 12% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010,2012, the Goldex MineLapa mine contained indicated mineral resources of 8.3 million1,118,000 tonnes grading 1.774.08 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 25.8 million934,000 tonnes grading 1.676.69 grams of gold per tonne.

(3)
The following table shows the reconciliation of mineral reserves (in nearest thousand tonnes) at the Goldex MineLapa mine by category at December 31, 20102012 with those at December 31, 2009.2011. Revision means additional mineral reserves converted from mineral resources or other categories of mineral reserves and mineral reserves added from exploration activities during 2010.2012.
 
  
  Proven Probable Total 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 2009 5,217 19,524 24,741 

Mined in 2010 824 1,958 2,782 

Revision 10,411 (4,576)5,835 

December 31, 2010 14,804 12,990 27,794 

  
  Proven Probable Total 
  
December 31, 2011 1,044 1,340 2,384 

Processed in 2012 640  640 

Revision 725 (401)324 

December 31, 2012 1,129 939 2,068 

(4)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Goldex MineLapa mine may be found in the Technical Report on the Estimation of Mineral Resource and Reserves for the Goldex Extension ZoneLapa Gold Project, Cadillac Township, Quebec, Canada filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on October 27, 2005.June 8, 2006.

6678            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


KittilaGoldex Mine Project Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

 As at December 31, 
 
 As at December 31, 
 2010 2009 2008   
 
 2012 2011 2010 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
GoldGold       Gold       



Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

403,000

 

257,000

 

199,000

 
Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 59,000  14,804,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.23 3.71 4.84 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.70  1.87 

Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 32,329,000 25,704,000 21,171,000 Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 6,936,000  13,722,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.64 4.83 4.69 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.55  1.63 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnesTotal proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 32,732,000 25,961,000 21,370,000 Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 6,995,000  28,526,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonneAverage grade – gold grams per tonne 4.64 4.82 4.69 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.55  1.75 

Total contained gold ouncesTotal contained gold ounces 4,880,000 4,025,000 3,225,000 Total contained gold ounces 349,000  1,609,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 2010suspension of mining operations at the Goldex mine on October 19, 2011 resulted in a restatement, as of that date, of all Goldex proven or probable reserves (as stated on December 31, 2010) that had not already been mined, as measured or indicated resources, except stockpiled ore on surface; the stockpiled ore was processed by the end of October 2011.

(2)
On July 25, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the development of underground mining operations in the M and E Zones, where initial reserves were estimated in a feasibility study completed on October 14, 2012.

(3)
The 2012 proven and probable mineral reserves set forth in the table above were estimated using an assumed metallurgical gold recovery of 93%. Mining costs were estimated to be C$41.77 per tonne for the E Zone and C$40.28 per tonne for the M Zone. The cut-off grade used for mineral reserves was 1.05 grams of gold per tonne for the E Zone and 1.01 grams of gold per tonne for the M Zone. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 4.4% change in mineral reserves.

(4)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2012, the Goldex mine project contained measured mineral resources of 12,360,000 tonnes grading 1.86 grams of gold per tonne, indicated mineral resources of 14,808,000 tonnes grading 1.83 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 34,645,000 tonnes grading 1.52 grams of gold per tonne.

(5)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Goldex mine project may be found in the Technical Report on Restatement of the Mineral Resources at Goldex Mine, Quebec, Canada as at October 19, 2011 filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on December 5, 2011 and the Technical Report on Production of the M and E Zones at Goldex Mine dated October 14, 2012 filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on November 1, 2012.

Kittila Mine Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

  As at December 31, 
  
  2012 2011 2010 
  
Gold       

 Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 1,461,000 702,000 403,000 

 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.59 5.09 4.23 

 Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 31,662,000 33,862,000 32,329,000 

 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.49 4.65 4.64 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 33,122,000 34,564,000 32,732,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 4.49 4.66 4.64 

Total contained gold ounces 4,783,000 5,177,000 4,880,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 2012 proven and probable mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates were calculated using a metallurgical gold recovery of 89.3%89%. Gold cut-off grades used were 1.851.98 grams per tonne, undiluted (1.65(1.76 grams per tonne, diluted) for open pit reserves and between 2.973.33 grams per tonne and 3.243.49 grams per tonne, undiluted (between 2.522.82 grams per tonne and 2.793.00 grams per tonne, diluted), depending on the deposit, for underground reserves. The open pit operating cost iswas estimated to be €33.99€50.57 per tonne in 2012, while the underground operating cost is estimated to vary between €52.06averaged €79.38 per tonne and €57.65 per tonne, depending on the deposit.in 2012. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 5%9.2% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010,2012, the Kittila Minemine contained indicated mineral resources of 15.3 million7,854,000 tonnes grading 2.412.65 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 8.3 million18,966,000 tonnes grading 2.503.88 grams of gold per tonne.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            79

Table of Contents


(3)
The breakdown of proven and probable mineral reserves between planned open pit operations and underground operations at the Kittila Minemine (with tonnage and contained ounces rounded to the nearest thousand) at December 31, 2012 is:
  
Category Mining Method Tonnes Gold Grade (g/t) Contained
Gold (oz)
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proven mineral reserve Open pit 395,000 4.19 53,000 

Proven mineral reserve Underground 8,000 6.00 2,000 

Total proven mineral reserve   403,000 4.23 55,000 

Probable mineral reserve Open pit 1,657,000 5.28 281,000 

Probable mineral reserve Underground 30,672,000 4.61 4,544,000 

Total probable mineral reserve   32,329,000 4.64 4,826,000 

  
Category Mining
Method
 Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 

Proven mineral reserves Open pit 272,000 4.30 38,000 

Proven mineral reserves Underground 1,189,000 4.66 178,000 

Total proven mineral reserves   1,461,000 4.59 216,000 

Probable mineral reserves Open pit 182,000 3.51 21,000 

Probable mineral reserves Underground 31,480,000 4.49 4,547,000 

Total probable mineral reserves   31,662,000 4.49 4,567,000 

(4)
The following table shows the reconciliation of mineral reserves (in nearest thousand tonnes) at the Kittila Minemine by category at December 31, 20102012 with those at December 31, 2009.2011. Revision means additional mineral reserves converted from mineral resources or other categories of mineral reserves and mineral reserves added from exploration activities during 2010.2012.
 
  
  Proven Probable Total 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 2009 257 25,704 25,961 

Mined in 2010 960 0 960 

Revision 1,106 6,625 7,731 

December 31, 2010 403 32,329 32,732 

  
  Proven Probable Total  
  

December 31, 2011 702 33,862 34,564  

Processed in 2012 1,090  1,090  

Revision 1,849 (2,200)(352) 

December 31, 2012 1,461 31,662 33,122  

(5)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Kittila Minemine may be found in the Technical Report on the December 31, 2009, Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimate and the Suuri Extension Project, Kittila Mine, Finland, filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on March 4, 2010.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            67

Table of Contents


Lapa Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

  As at December 31, 
  
  2010 2009 2008 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Gold       
 
Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

1,122,000

 

897,000

 

23,000

 

 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 7.24 8.33 7.53 

 Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 1,709,000 2,319,000 3,730,000 

 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 7.56 8.09 8.80 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 2,831,000 3,216,000 3,753,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 7.43 8.16 8.79 

Total contained gold ounces 677,000 843,000 1,061,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 2010 mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates were calculated using an assumed metallurgical gold recovery of 80% and a cut-off grade of 4.1 grams of gold per tonne. The operating cost per tonne estimate for the Lapa Mine was C$115.86. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 7% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010, the Lapa Mine contained indicated mineral resources of 1.8 million tonnes grading 4.10 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 0.5 million tonnes grading 8.27 grams of gold per tonne.

(3)
The following table shows the reconciliation of mineral reserves (in nearest thousand tonnes) at the Lapa Mine by category at December 31, 2010 with those at December 31, 2009. Revision means additional mineral reserves converted from mineral resources or other categories of mineral reserves and mineral reserves added from exploration activities during 2010.
  
  Proven Probable Total 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 2009 897 2,319 3,216 

Mined in 2010 519 0 519 

Revision 744 (610)134 

December 31, 2010 1,122 1,709 2,831 

(4)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Lapa Mine may be found in the Technical Report on the Lapa Gold Project, Cadillac Township, Quebec, Canada filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on June 8, 2006.

6880            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Pinos Altos Mine Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

 As at December 31, 
 
 As at December 31, 
 2010 2009 2008   


 2012 2011 2010 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
Gold and SilverGold and Silver       Gold and Silver       



Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

2,864,000

 

880,000

 

97,000

 

Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

3,067,000

 

1,987,000

 

2,864,000

 

Average gold grade – grams per tonne 1.90 1.51 1.35 Average gold grade – grams per tonne 2.54 1.83 1.90 

Average silver grade – grams per tonne 54.06 26.53 19.08 Average silver grade – grams per tonne 81.31 51.59 54.06 

Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 41,298,000 41,080,000 41,669,000 Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 35,074,000 44,792,000 41,298,000 

Average gold grade – grams per tonne 2.33 2.54 2.68 Average gold grade – grams per tonne 2.18 2.07 2.33 

Average silver grade – grams per tonne 65.53 70.31 74.61 Average silver grade – grams per tonne 58.90 59.17 65.53 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnesTotal proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 44,162,000 41,960,000 41,766,000 Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 38,141,000 46,779,000 44,162,000 

Average gold grade – grams per tonneAverage gold grade – grams per tonne 2.30 2.52 2.68 Average gold grade – grams per tonne 2.21 2.06 2.30 

Average silver grade – grams per tonneAverage silver grade – grams per tonne 64.78 69.39 74.48 Average silver grade – grams per tonne 60.71 58.85 64.78 

Total contained gold ouncesTotal contained gold ounces 3,271,000 3,396,000 3,593,000 Total contained gold ounces 2,714,000 3,103,000 3,271,000 

Total contained silver ouncesTotal contained silver ounces 91,982,000 93,613,000 100,010,000 Total contained silver ounces 74,441,000 88,508,000 91,982,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 20102012 proven and probable mineral reserve estimate isestimates are based on a net smelter return cut-off value of the open pit ore between $5.81$9.01 per tonne and $22.08$28.43 per tonne, depending on the deposit, and a net smelter return cut-off value of the underground ore of $43.30$59.11 per tonne. The operating cost per tonne estimate for the Pinos Altos mine in 2012 was $35.41 without deferred stripping ($32.24 with deferred stripping). The metallurgical gold recovery used in the reserve estimateestimates varied between 59% and 96.5%96%, depending on the deposit. The metallurgical silver recovery used in the reserve estimateestimates varied between 11%10% and 52.0%44.21%, depending on the deposit. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 2%2.2% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010,2012, the Pinos Altos Minemine contained indicated mineral resources of 25.6 million17,947,000 tonnes grading 1.021.52 grams of gold per tonne and 21.3433.13 grams of silver per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 25.7 million24,592,000 tonnes grading 1.091.19 grams of gold per tonne and 23.4625.00 grams of silver per tonne.

(3)
The proven and probable mineral reserves of the Pinos Altos Minemine set forthout in the table above include stockpiled proven mineral reserves from the Creston Mascota deposit of 0.4 million136,000 tonnes grading 1.010.96 grams of gold per tonne and 3.237.42 grams of silver per tonne and probable mineral reserves from the Creston Mascota deposit of 7.2 million9,950,000 tonnes grading 1.521.12 grams of gold per tonne and 15.8212.00 grams of silver per tonne. The indicated mineral resource at the Pinos Altos Minemine also includes indicated mineral resources from the Creston Mascota deposit of 5.3 million1,765,000 tonnes grading 0.720.58 grams of gold per tonne and 6.783.78 grams of silver per tonne. The inferred mineral resource at the Pinos Altos Minemine also includes inferred mineral resources from the Creston Mascota deposit of 2.5 million1,079,000 tonnes grading 0.880.79 grams of gold per tonne and 8.165.95 grams of silver per tonne.

(4)
The breakdown of mineral reserves between planned open pit operations and underground operations at the Pinos Altos Minemine (with tonnage and contained ounces rounded to the nearest thousand) at December 31, 2012 is:
 
  
Category Mining Method Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Silver
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 Contained
Silver (oz)
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Proven mineral reserve Open pit stock pile 1,078,000 0.89 13.26 31,000 460,000 

Proven mineral reserve Underground 1,786,000 2.52 78.68 144,000 4,518,000 

Total proven mineral reserve   2,864,000 1.90 54.06 175,000 4,977,400 

Probable mineral reserve Open pit 16,987,000 1.98 45.34 1,083,000 24,761,000 

Probable mineral reserve Underground 24,311,000 2.58 79.64 2,013,000 62,243,000 

Total probable mineral reserve   41,298,000 2.33 65.53 3,096,000 87,004,000 

  
Category Mining
Method
 Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Silver
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 Contained
Silver (oz)
 

Proven mineral reserves Open pit stock pile 457,000 0.93 19.45 14,000 286,000 

Proven mineral reserves Underground 2,610,000 2.82 92.14 237,000 7,732,000 

Total proven mineral reserves   3,067,000 2.54 81.31 250,000 8,018,000 

Probable mineral reserves Open pit 15,692,000 1.75 37.43 884,000 18,886,000 

Probable mineral reserves Underground 19,382,000 2.54 76.29 1,580,000 47,537,000 

Total probable mineral reserves   35,074,000 2.18 58.90 2,464,000 66,424,000 

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            6981

Table of Contents


(5)
The following table shows the reconciliation of mineral reserves (in nearest thousand tonnes) at the Pinos Altos Minemine by category at December 31, 20102012 with those at December 31, 2009.2011. Revision means additional mineral reserves converted from mineral resources or other categories of mineral reserves and mineral reserves added from exploration activities during 2010.2012.
 
  
  Proven Probable Total 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
December 31, 2009 880 41,080 41,960 

Mined in 2010 2,437 0 2,437 

Revision 4,421 218 4,639 

December 31, 2010 2,864 41,298 44,162 

  
  Proven Probable Total  
  

December 31, 2011 1,987 44,792 46,779  

Processed in 2012 4,395  4,395  

Revision 5,475 (9,718)(4,243) 

December 31, 2012 3,067 35,074 38,141  

(6)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Pinos Altos Minemine may be found in the Pinos Altos Gold-Silver Mining Project, Chihuahua State, Mexico, Technical Report on the Mineral Resources and Reserves as of December 31, 2008 filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on March 25, 2009.

MeadowbankLa India Mine Project Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

 As at December 31, 
 
 As at December 31, 
 2010 2009 2008   


 2012 2011 2010 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
GoldGold       Gold       

Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

839,000

 

600,000

 


 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 3.13 4.57  

Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 33,259,000 31,600,000 32,773,000 
Probable mineral reserves – tonnes

 

33,457,000

 


 

n/a

 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 3.18 3.51 3.45 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 0.72  n/a 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnesTotal proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 34,098,000 32,200,000 32,773,000 Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 33,457,000  n/a 

Average grade – gold grams per tonneAverage grade – gold grams per tonne 3.18 3.53 3.45 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 0.72  n/a 

Total contained gold ouncesTotal contained gold ounces 3,486,000 3,655,000 3,638,000 Total contained gold ounces 776,000  n/a 

Notes:

(1)
The 20102012 mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates for the La India mine project (including the Tarachi deposit) were calculated using a metallurgical gold recovery of 93.1%.62% or 89%, depending on the deposit. The economic cut-off grade used to determine the open pit reserves varied from 1.270.2 grams of gold per tonne to 1.300.4 grams of gold per tonne, depending on the deposit.deposit, and is 0.15/0.30 grams of gold per tonne as a marginal cut-off grade. The estimated operating cost used for the 20102012 mineral reserve estimate varied between C$41.99was $7.10 per tonne and C$42.90 per tonne, depending on the deposit.tonne. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 2%1.9% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010,2012, the Meadowbank MineLa India mine project (including the Tarachi deposit) contained measured mineral resources of 1,662,000 tonnes grading 0.29 grams of gold per tonne, indicated mineral resources of 25.8 million41,530,000 tonnes grading 1.670.42 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 10.2 million81,002,000 tonnes of ore grading 2.150.39 grams of gold per tonne.

(3)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the La India mine project may be found in the Technical Report on the June 30, 2012 Update of the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, La India Gold Project, Municipality of Sahuaripa, Sonora, Mexico, dated August 31, 2012, filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on October 12, 2012.

82            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Meadowbank Mine Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

  As at December 31, 
  
  2012 2011 2010 
  
Gold       

 
Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

1,764,000

 

1,931,000

 

839,000

 

 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 1.56 1.49 3.13 

 Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 23,560,000 22,563,000 33,259,000 

 Average grade – gold grams per tonne 2.91 2.91 3.18 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 25,324,000 24,494,000 34,098,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 2.82 2.79 3.18 

Total contained gold ounces 2,294,000 2,201,000 3,486,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 2012 mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates were calculated using a metallurgical gold recovery of 91% or 94%, depending on the deposit. The economic cut-off grade used to determine the open pit reserves varied from 1.14 grams of gold per tonne to 1.16 grams of gold per tonne, depending on the deposit, and is 1.03 to 1.06 grams of gold per tonne as a marginal cut-off grade, depending on the deposit. The estimated ore-based operating costs used for the 2012 mineral reserve estimate varied between C$53.60 per tonne and C$54.72 per tonne, depending on the deposit, with an additional haulage cost of C$1.12 for Vault deposit reserves. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 0.2% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2012, the Meadowbank mine contained measured mineral resources of 1,441,000 tonnes grading 0.93 grams of gold per tonne, indicated mineral resources of 8,885,000 tonnes grading 2.75 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 3,589,000 tonnes of ore grading 3.81 grams of gold per tonne.

(3)
The following table shows the reconciliation of mineral reserves (in nearest thousand tonnes) at the Meadowbank Minemine by category at December 31, 20102012 with those at December 31, 2009.2011. Revision means additional mineral reserves converted from mineral resources or other categories of mineral reserves, an update to mineral reserves based on changed mine plans, and mineral reserves added from exploration activities during 2010.2012.
 
  
  Proven Probable Total 
  
December 31, 2009 600 31,600 32,200 

Mined in 2010 2,570 0 2,570 

Revision 2,809 1,659 4,468 

December 31, 2010 839 33,259 34,098 

  
  Proven Probable Total 
  

December 31, 2011 1,931 22,563 24,494 

Processed in 2012 3,821  3,821 

Revision 3,654 997 4,651 

December 31, 2012 1,764 23,560 25,324 

(4)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Meadowbank Minemine may be found in the Technical Report on the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves dated September 30, 2008,at Meadowbank Gold Project,Mine, Nunavut, Canada as at December 31, 2011 filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on December 15, 2008.March 23, 2012.

70            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            83

Table of Contents


Meliadine Project Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources

 As at December 31, 
 
 As at December 31, 
 2010 2009 2008   


 2012 2011 2010 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
GoldGold       Gold       



Proven mineral reserves – tonnes

 

0

 


 


 
Proven mineral reserves – tonnes 34,000 34,000  

Average grade – gold grams per tonne    Average grade – gold grams per tonne 7.31 7.31  

Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 9,467,000   Probable mineral reserves – tonnes 13,266,000 12,434,000 9,467,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonne 8.54   Average grade – gold grams per tonne 6.98 7.18 6.49 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnesTotal proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 9,467,000   Total proven and probable mineral reserves – tonnes 13,300,000 12,468,000 9,467,000 

Average grade – gold grams per tonneAverage grade – gold grams per tonne 8.54   Average grade – gold grams per tonne 6.98 7.18 6.49 

Total contained gold ouncesTotal contained gold ounces 2,600,000   Total contained gold ounces 2,987,000 2,877,000 2,600,000 

Notes:

(1)
The 20102012 mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates were calculated using metallurgical gold recovery curves for Tiriganiaq and F Zone. The curves give a maximum recovery of 96% for Tiriganiaq and 93% for F Zone. The 2012 mineral resource estimates for all other zones were calculated using a metallurgical gold recovery of 95.6%.94%, except for Wolf and Pump, which were calculated using a metallurgical gold recovery of 95% and 90%, respectively. The cut-off grade used to determine the open pit reserves was 2.331.94 grams of gold per tonne, undiluted (2.03(1.69 grams of gold per tonne, diluted), and the cut-off grade used to determine the underground reserves was 6.34.89 grams of gold per tonne, undiluted (4.88(3.62 grams of gold per tonne, diluted). The estimated operating cost used for the 20102012 mineral reserve estimate was C$103.1474.71 per tonne for open pit and C$165.65 per tonne for underground. The Company estimates that a 10% change in the gold price would result in an approximate 2%3.5% change in mineral reserves.

(2)
In addition to the mineral reserves set out above, at December 31, 2010,2012, the Meliadine project contained indicated mineral resources of 8.8 million17,234,000 tonnes grading 5.213.94 grams of gold per tonne and inferred mineral resources of 11.8 million14,816,000 tonnes of ore grading 6.946.15 grams of gold per tonne.

(3)
The breakdown of mineral reserves between planned open pit operations and underground operations at the Meliadine project (with tonnage and contained ounces rounded to the nearest thousand) at December 31, 2012 is:
 
  
Category Mining Method Tonnes Gold Grade (g/t) Contained
Gold (oz)
 

Probable mineral reserve Open pit 4,287,000 6.91 953,000 

Probable mineral reserve Underground 5,180,000 9.89 1,647,000 

Total probable mineral reserve   9,467,000 8.54 2,600,000 

  
Category Mining
Method
 Tonnes Gold
Grade
(g/t)
 Contained
Gold (oz)
 

Proven mineral reserves Open pit stockpile 34,000 7.31 8,000 

Probable mineral reserves Open pit 5,172,000 5.85 973,000 

Probable mineral reserves Underground 8,094,000 7.71 2,006,000 

Total probable mineral reserves   13,266,000 6.98 2,979,000 

Total proven and probable mineral reserves   13,300,000 6.98 2,987,000 

(4)
Complete information on the verification procedures, the quality assurance program, quality control procedures, parameters and methods and other factors that may materially affect scientific and technical information presented in this Form 20-F relating to the Meliadine project may be found in the Technical Report on the December 31, 2010 Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimate, Meliadine Gold Project, Nunavut, Canada dated February 16, 2011, filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR on March 8, 2011.

Risk Mitigation

The Company mitigates the likelihood and potential severity of the various risks it encounters in its day-to-day operations through the application of high standards in the planning, construction and operation of mining facilities. In addition, emphasis is placed on hiring and retaining competent personnel and developing their skills through training in safety and loss control. The Company's operating and technical personnel have a solid track record of developing and operating precious metal mines and several of the Company's mines have been recognized for excellence in this regard with various safety and development awards. Nevertheless, the Company and its employees continue with a focused effort to improve workplace safety and the Company has placed additional emphasis on safety procedure training for both mining and supervisory employees.

The Company also mitigates some of the Company's normal business risk through the purchase of insurance coverage. An Insurable Risk Management Policy, approved by the Board, governs the purchase of insurance coverage and only permits the purchase of coverage from insurance companies of the highest credit quality. For a more complete list of the risk factors affecting the Company, please see "Item 3 Key Information – Risk Factors".

2010 ANNUAL REPORT84                        71AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Glossary of Selected Mining Terms



"acid mine drainage"

Acidic run-off water from mines and mine waste containing sulphide minerals.

"alteration"


Any physical or chemical change in the mineral composition of a rock or mineral subsequent to formation.its formation, generally produced by weathering or hydrothermal solutions. Milder and more localized than metamorphism.

"anastomosing"


A network of branching and rejoining fault or vein surfaces or surface traces.

"andesite"


A dark-coloured, igneous,fine-grained calc-alkaline volcanic rock of intermediate composition (containing between 52-63% silica).composition.

"assay"


An analysisTo analyze the proportions of metals in an ore; to determine the presence, absencetest an ore or concentrationmineral for composition, purity, weight or other properties of one or more chemical components.commercial interest.

"banded iron formation"
An iron formation that shows marked banding, generally of iron-rich minerals and chert or fine-grained quartz.
"bedrock"

The solidSolid rock underlyingexposed at the surface deposits.of the Earth or overlain by unconsolidated material, weathered rock or soil.

"bench"
A ledge in an open-pit mine that forms a single level of operation above which minerals or waste rock are excavated. The ore or waste is removed in successive layers (benches), several of which may be in operation simultaneously.
"breccia"

Said ofA rock formations consisting mostly ofin which angular rock fragments hostedare surrounded by a mass of fine-grained matrix.minerals.

"brittle"


Of minerals, proneness to fracture under low stress. A quality affecting behaviour during comminution of ore, whereby one species fractures more readily than others in the material being crushed.

"bulk mining"


A method of mining method in which large quantities of low-grade ore are mined without an attempt to segregate the high-grade portions.

"byproduct metal"byproduct"


A secondary metal or additional metalmineral product recovered from the processing of rock.

"carbon-in-leach process"(CIL)"


A processprecious metals recovery step in which granular activated carbon particles much larger thanthe mill. Gold and silver are leached from the ground ore particles are introduced intoand at the ore pulp. Cyanide leaching and precious metal adsorptionsame time adsorbed onto thegranules of activated carbon, occur simultaneously. The loaded activated carbonwhich is mechanically screened to separate it from the barren ore pulpthen separated by screening and processed to remove the precious metals and prepare it for reuse.metals.

"carbon-in-pulp (CIP) circuit""


A processprecious metals recovery step in the mill. After gold and silver have been leached from ground ore, they are adsorbed onto granules of activated carbon, which is then separated by which soluble gold within a finely ground slurry is recovered by adsorption onto coarser activated carbon.screening and processed to remove the precious metals. A CIP circuit comprises a series of tanks through which leached slurry flows. Gold is captured onto captive activated carbon that will periodically be moved counter-currently from tank to tank. Head tank carbon is extracted periodically to further recover adsorbed gold before being returned to the circuit tails tank.

"clast"chalcopyrite"


A fragmentsulphide mineral of copper and iron; the most important ore mineral rock or organic structure that has been moved individually from its place of origin.copper.

"concentrate"


The clean product recovered by froth flotation in froth flotation.the plant.

"conglomerate"


A coarse-grained sedimentary rock consistingcomposed of rounded water-worn pebbles or bouldersfragments set in a fine-grained cemented into a solid mass.matrix.

"contact"
A plane or irregular surface between two types or ages of rock.
"counter-current decantation"

Clarifying washThe clarification of washery water and concentratingthe concentration of tailings by the use of several thickeners in series. The water flows in the opposite direction from the solids. The final products are slurry that is removed as fluid mud and clear water that is reused in the circuit.

"crosscut"


A horizontal openingAn underground passage driven from a shaft toward the ore, at or near(or near) right angles to the strike of a vein or other orebody.

"cut-off grade"


(A) In respect of mineral resources, the lowestThe minimum metal grade below which the mineralized rock currently cannot reasonablyin an ore that can be expected to be economically extracted.



(B) In respect of mineral reserves, the lowest grade below which the mineralized rock currently cannot be economically extracted as demonstrated by either a preliminary feasibility study or a feasibility study.



Cut-off grades vary between deposits depending upon the amenability of ore to gold extraction and upon costs of production and metal prices.mined profitably.

72            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            85

Table of Contents



"cyanidation"
A method of extracting exposed gold or silver grains from crushed or ground ore by dissolving (leaching) it in a weak cyanide solution. May be carried out in tanks inside a mill or in heaps of ore out of doors (heap leach).
"deposit"

A mineralized body that has been physically delineated by sufficient drilling, trenching and/natural occurrence of mineral or underground workmineral aggregate, in such quantity and foundquality to be of sufficient average grade of metal or metals to warrant further exploration and/or development expenditures; such a deposit does not qualify as a commercially mineable orebody or as containing mineral reserves, until final legal, technical and economic factors have been resolved.invite exploitation.

"development"


The preparation of a mining property or area so that an orebody can be analyzed and its tonnage and quality estimated. Development is an intermediate stage between exploration and mining.

"diamond drill hole"drill"


A borehole drilled usingdrilling machine with a rotating, hollow, diamond-studded bit inset with diamonds as the rock-cutting tool. The bitthat cuts a circular channel around a core, of rock thatwhich can be recovered to provide a more-or-less continuous and complete columnar sample of the rock penetrated.

"dilution"


The effectcontamination of wasteore with barren wall rock or low-grade ore being included in mined ore,stoping, increasing tonnage mined and lowering the overall ore grade.

"dip"


The angle at which a surfacevein, structure or rock bed is inclined from the horizontal.horizontal as measured at right angles to the strike.

"discordant"


Said of a contact between an igneous intrusion and the country rock that is not parallel to the foliation or the bedding planes of the latter.

"disseminated"


Said of a mineral deposit (especially of metals) in which the desired minerals occur as scattered particles in the rock, but in sufficient quantity to make the deposit an ore. Some disseminated deposits are very large.

"dore"
Unrefined gold and silver bullion bars, which will be further refined to almost pure metal.
"drift"

A horizontal underground opening that follows alongin or near an orebody and parallel to the lengthlong dimension of a vein or rock formation,the orebody, as opposed to a crosscut that crosses the rock formation.orebody.

"ductile"


Of rock, able to sustain, under a given set of conditions, 5% to 10% deformation before fracturing or faulting.

"dyke"


An earthen embankment, as around a drill sump or tank, or to impound a body of water or mill tailings. Also, a tabular body of igneous rock that cuts across the structure of adjacent rocks.

"electrowinning"


An electrochemical process in which a metal dissolved within an electrolyte is plated onto an electrode. Used to recover metals such as copper and gold from solution in the leaching of concentrates, etc.

"envelope"


1. The outer or covering part of a fold, especially of a folded structure that includes some sort of structural break.

 


2. A metamorphic rock surrounding an igneous intrusion.

 


3. In a mineral, an outer part different in origin from an inner part.

"epigenetic"


An orebodyOrebodies formed by hydrothermal fluids and gases that were introduced into the host rocks from elsewhere, filling cavities in the host rock.

"epithermal"


A hydrothermalReferring to a mineral deposit that formed within one kilometrelater than the enclosing rocks consisting of the Earth's surfaceveins and in the temperature range of 50 to 200 degrees Celsius, occurring mainly as veins. Also, said of that depositional environment.replacement bodies, containing precious metals or, more rarely, base metals.

"extensional-shear vein"


A vein put in place in an extension fracture caused by the deformation of a rock.

"fault"


A fracture or a fracture zone in crustal rocks along which there has been displacement of the two sides relative to one another parallel to the fracture. The displacement may be a few inches or many kilometres long.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT86                        73AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



"feasibility study"


A comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral deposit in which all geological, engineering,project that includes appropriately detailed assessments of realistically assumed mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, operating, economic,environmental, social environmental and governmental considerations, together with any other relevant operational factors and a detailed financial analysis, that are considered in sufficient detailnecessary to demonstrate at the time of reporting that it couldextraction is reasonably justified (economically mineable). The results of the study may reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution about whether to proceed with, or finance, the development of the deposit for mineral production.project. The confidence level of the study will be higher than that of a pre-feasibility study.


"felsic"

A "preliminary feasibility studyterm used to describe light-coloured rocks containing feldspar, feldspathoids and silica.
" or "flotation"pre-feasibility study" is a comprehensive study of the viability of a mineral project that has advanced to a stage where the mining method (in the case of underground mining) or the pit configuration (in the case of an open pit) has been established, and an effectiveThe method of mineral processing has been determined. It includesseparation in which a financial analysis based on reasonable assumptionsfroth created by a variety of technical, engineering, legal, operating, economic, social and environmental factors and the evaluation ofreagents floats some finely crushed minerals, whereas other relevant factors that are sufficient for a qualified person, acting reasonably, to determine if all or part of the mineral resource may be classified as a mineral reserve.

"flotation"


A process for concentrating minerals based on the selective adhesion of certain minerals to air bubbles in a mixture of water and ground ore. When the right chemicals are added to a frothy water bath of ore that has been ground to the consistency of talcum powder, the minerals will float to the surface.sink. The metal-rich flotation concentrate is then skimmed off the surface.

"flowsheet"
A diagram showing the progress of material through a treatment plant.
"foliation"

A general term for a planar arrangement of textural or structural features in any type of rock, especially the planar structure that results from flattening of the constituent grains ofin a metamorphic rock.

"footwall"
The rock beneath an inclined vein or ore deposit. (Opposite of a hanging wall).
"fracture"

A general term for anyAny break in a rock, whether or not it causes displacement, due to mechanical failure by stress. Fractures includestress; includes cracks, joints and faults.

"free gold"


Gold not combined with other substances.

"glacial till"


Dominantly unsorted and unstratified, drift, generally unconsolidated rock debris, deposited directly by and underneath a glacier without subsequent reworking by meltwater, and consisting of a heterogeneous mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel and boulders ranging widely in size and shape. Also referred to as "till" and ice-laid drift.glacier.

"grade"


The relative quality ofquantity or the percentage of metal content in a mineralized body, i.e.of an orebody,e.g., grams of gold per tonne of rock.rock, or percent copper.

"greenstone belt"
An area underlain by metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks, usually in a continental shield.
"grouting"The process of sealing off a water flow in rocks by forcing a thin slurry of cement or other chemicals into the crevices; usually done through a diamond drill hole.
"hanging wall"The rock on the upper side of a vein or ore deposit.
"head grade"

The average grade of ore fed into a mill.

"hectare"


A metric measurement of area. 1 hectare = 10,000 square metersmetres = 2.47 acres.

"horst"


An up-faulted block of rock.

"hydrothermal alteration"


Alteration of rocks or minerals by reaction with hydrothermal (magmatic) fluids.

"igneous rock"
Rock formed by the solidification of molten material that originated within the Earth.
"indicated mineral resource"

TheThat part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters and to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

 


While this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in this category will ever be converted into mineral reserves.

74            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            87

Table of Contents



"inferred mineral resource"


TheThat part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

 


While this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in this category will ever be converted into mineral reserves. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part of or all of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

"infill drilling"


Drilling within a defined mineralized area to improve the definition of known mineralization.

"intrusive"


A body of igneous rock formed by the consolidation of magma intruded below surface into other rocks, in contrast to lavas, which are extruded upon the Earth's surface.

"iron formation"


A chemical sedimentary rock, typically thin-bedded or finely laminated, containing at least 15% iron of sedimentary origin and commonly containing layers of chert.

"kilometre"


A metric measurement of distance. 1.0 kilometre = 1,000 metres = 0.62 miles.

"leaching"
A chemical process for the extraction of valuable minerals from ore; also, a natural process by which ground waters dissolve minerals.
"lens"

Generally used to describe a body of oreA geological deposit that is thick in the middle and tapers towards the ends, resembling a convex lens.

"lithologic groups"


Geological groups.Groups of rock formations.

"lode"


A mineral deposit consisting of a zone of veins, veinlets or disseminations.

"longitudinal retreat"


An underground mining method where the ore is excavated in horizontal slices along the orebody and the stoping starts below and advances upwards. The ore is recovered underneath in the stope.

"mafic"
Igneous rocks composed mostly of dark, iron- and magnesium-rich silicate minerals.
"massive"

Said of a mineral deposit, especially of sulphides, characterized by a great concentration of ore in one place, as opposed to a disseminated or vein-like deposit. Said of any rock that has a homogeneous texture or fabric over a large area, with an absence of layering or any similar directional structure.

"matrix"


The non-valuable mineralsfine-grained rock material in an ore, i.e., gangue.which a larger mineral is embedded.

"measured mineral resource"


TheThat part of a mineral resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters and to support mineproduction planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity.

 


While this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize it.
Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in this category will ever be converted into mineral reserves.

88            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



"Merrill-Crowe process"


A separation technique for removing gold from a cyanide solution. The solution is separated from the ore by methods such as filtration and counter-current decantation, and then the gold is precipitated onto zinc dust. Silver and copper may also precipitate. The precipitate is filtered to capture the gold slimes, which are further refined,e.g., by smelting, to remove the zinc and by treating with nitric acid to dissolve the silver.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            75

Table of Contents



"mesothermal deposit"


A mineral deposit formed at moderate temperature and pressure by deposition from hydrothermal fluids along a fissure or other opening in rock at an intermediate depth.

"metallurgical properties"


Properties characterizing metals and minerals behaviour under various processing techniques.

"metamorphism"


The process by which the form or structure of sedimentary or igneous rocks is changed by heat and pressure.

"mill"


A mineral treatment plant in which crushing, wet grinding and further treatment of ore is conducted.conducted; also a revolving drum used for the grinding of ores in preparation for treatment.

"mineral reserve"


The economically mineable part of a mineral resource. The economics of the mineral reserve should be demonstrated by a feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction is justified. A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.

"mineral resource"


A concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal and industrial minerals in or on the Earth's crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a mineral resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in any category of resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves.

"mineral reserve"
The economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.
"muck"

Finely blasted rock (ore or waste) underground.

"net smelter return royalty"


A phrase used to describe a royalty payment made by a producer of metals based on gross metal productionthe proceeds from the property, less deductionsale of certain limitedmineral products after deducting off-site processing and distribution costs including smelting, refining, transportation and insurance costs.

"ounce"


A measurement of mass.weight, especially used for gold, silver and platinum group metals. 1 troy ounce = 31.1035 grams.

"outcrop"


An exposureThe part of bedrocka rock formation that appears at the surface.surface of the Earth.

"oxidation"


A chemical reaction caused by exposure to oxygen, which results in a change in the chemical composition of a mineral.

"oxidative"


Descriptive of an oxidation reaction.

"phenocryst"


A term for largeLarge crystals or mineral grains occurringfloating in the matrix or groundmass of a porphyry.

"pillar"
A block of ore or other rock entirely surrounded by stoping, left intentionally for purposes of ground control or on account of low value.
"plunge"

The inclination of a fold axis or other linear structure from a horizontal plane, measured in the vertical plane.

"polydeformed"


A rock that has been subjected to more than one instance of folding, faulting, shearing, compression or extension as a result of various tectonic forces.

"porphyritic"


Rock texture in which one or more minerals has a larger grain size than the accompanying minerals.

"porphyry"


Any igneous rock in which relatively large crystals, called phenocrysts, are set in a fine-grained groundmass.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            89

Table of Contents



"preliminary feasibility study" or "pre-feasibility study"
A comprehensive study of a range of options for the technical and economic viability of a mineral project that has advanced to a stage where a preferred mining method (in the case of underground mining) or the pit configuration (in the case of an open pit) is established, and an effective method of mineral processing is determined. It includes a financial analysis based on reasonable assumptions on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social and governmental considerations and the evaluation of any other relevant factors which are sufficient for a qualified person, acting reasonably, to determine if all or part of the mineral resource may be classified as a mineral reserve.
"pressure oxidation process"oxidation"

A process by which sulphide minerals are oxidized in order to expose gold that is encapsulated in the mineral lattice. The main component of a pressure oxidation circuit consists of one or morea pressurized vessels (autoclaves). Oxygenvessel (autoclave) where the oxygen level, process temperature and acidity are the primary control parameters of such units.parameters.

"probable mineral reserve"


The economically mineable part of an indicated and, in some circumstances, a measured mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.

76            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



"proven mineral reserve"


The economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study.

"pyrite"
A yellow iron sulphide mineral, FeS2, normally of little value. It is sometimes referred to as "fool's gold".
"pyroclastic"

ProducedRocks produced by explosive or aerial ejection of ash, fragments and glassy material from a volcanic vent. Term applicable to the rocks and rock layers as well as to the textures so formed.

"recovery"


A term used in process metallurgy to indicate the proportion of valuable material obtained in the processing of an ore. It is generally stated as aThe percentage of valuable metal in the ore that is recovered compared to the total valuable metal present in the ore before processing.by metallurgical treatment.

"reverse circulation drilling"


A type of drilling into rock using a solid bit to produce a hole and deliver rock chips (rather than core) to surface for analysis. Less expensive and faster than diamond drilling but not as accurate.

"rock burst"
A sudden and often violent breaking of a mass of rock from the walls of a mine, caused by failure of highly stressed rock and the rapid release of accumulated strain energy.
"run-of-mine ore"

The raw, mined orematerial as it is delivered, prior to sorting, stockpiling or treatment.

"sandstone"
A sedimentary rock consisting of grains of sand cemented together.
"schist"

A strongly foliated crystalline rock that can be readily split into thinkthin flakes or slabs due to the well developedwell-developed parallelism of more than 50% of the minerals present in it.it, such as mica or hornblende.

"scrubber"sedimentary rocks"


A device for separating particulate materialRocks resulting from a waste gas stream.the consolidation of loose sediment that has accumulated in layers. Examples are limestone, shale and sandstone.

"semi-autogenous grinding"orgrinding (SAG)"SAG"


A method of grinding rock whereby larger chunks of the rock itself and steel balls form the grinding media.

"shear"or "shearing"


The deformation of rocks by lateral movement along innumerable parallel planes, generally resulting from pressure and producing such metamorphic structures such as cleavage and schistosity.

"shear zone"
A tabular zone of rock that has been crushed and brecciated by many parallel fractures due to shear stress. Such an area is often mineralized by ore-forming solutions.
"sill"

An intrusive sheet of igneous rock of roughly uniform thickness that has been forced between the bedding planes of existing rock.

"slurry"


Fine rock particles in circulating water.water in a treatment plant.

90            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


"stope"1. Any excavation in a mine, other than development workings, made for the purpose of extracting ore.

"stope development"


Driving subsidiary openings to prepare blocks of2. To excavate ore for extraction by stoping.in an underground mine.

"strike"


The direction, or bearing of the outcrop of an inclined bed, vein or fault plane on a horizontal surface; the directionfrom true north, of a horizontal line perpendicularon a vein or rock formation at right angles to the direction of the dip.

"stringers"


Mineral veinlets or filaments occurring in a discontinuous subparallel pattern in a host rock.

"sublevel retreat"


An underground mining method in which the ore is excavated in horizontal slices along the orebody, starting below and advancing upwards. The ore is recovered underneath in the stope.

"sulphide"
A mineral characterized by the linkage of sulphur with a metal, such as pyrite, FeS2.
"tabular"

Said of a feature having two dimensions that are much larger or longer than the third, such as a dyke.

"tailings"


Material rejected from thea mill after most of the economically and technically recoverable valuable minerals have been extracted.

"tailings dam"


A natural or man-made confined area suitable for depositing tailings.

"tailings"tailings impoundment" or "tailings pond"


A low-lying depression usedArea closed at the lower end by a constraining wall or dam to confine tailings,which mill effluents are sent, the prime function of which is to allow enough time for metals to settle out or for cyanide to be naturally destroyed before the water is returned to the mill or discharged into the local watershed.

"tenement"


The right to enter, develop and work a mineral deposit. Includes a mining claim or a mining lease. A synonym of mineral title.

"thickener"
A vessel for reducing the proportion of water in a pulp by means of sedimentation.
"thickness"

The distance at right angles between the hanging wall and the footwall of a lode or lens.

"tonne"


A metric measurement of mass. 1 tonne = 1,000 kilograms = 2,204.6 pounds.pounds = 1.1 tons.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            77

Table of Contents



"transfer fault"


A structure that can accommodate lateral variations of deformation and strain.

"transverse open stoping"


An underground mining method in which the ore is excavated in horizontal slices perpendicular to the orebody length and the stoping starts below and advances upwards. The ore is recovered underneath the stope through a drawpoint system.

"twinned drill hole"trench"


A borehole drilled very closenarrow excavation dug through overburden, or blasted out of rock, to an original hole in the same direction and dip in order to verify the results from the original drill hole.expose a vein or ore structure for sampling or observation.

"vein"


MineralsA mineral filling of a fissure, fault or crackother fracture in a host rock.

"wacke"


A "dirty" sandstone that consists of a mixture of poorly sorted mineral and rock fragments in an abundant matrix of clay and fine silt.

"winze"


An internal mine shaft.

"Zadra elution circuit"


The process in this part of a gold mill strips gold and silver from carbon granules and puts them into solution.

"zone"


An area of distinct mineralization,i.e., a deposit.

78            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


ITEM 4A   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            91

Table of Contents


ITEM 5   OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

Results of Operations

Revenues from Mining Operations

In 2010,2012, revenue from mining operations increased 132%by 5% to $1,423$1,917.7 million from $614$1,821.8 million in 2009.2011. The increase in revenue was mainly driven by the increase in gold production from the Company's Goldex, Kittila, Lapa, Pinos Altos and Meadowbank mines. In addition,primarily attributable to higher sales prices wereand sales volumes realized on gold silver, zinc and copper.in 2012 compared with 2011.

In 2010,2012, sales of precious metals (gold and silver) accounted for 93%97% of revenues from mining operations, up from 87%95% in 20092011 and 78%93% in 2008.2010. The increase in the percentage of revenues from precious metals when compared with 2011 is due primarily to 2009 is largely due to the increasehigher sales prices and sales volumes realized on gold and lower sales volumes on zinc, offset partially by decreases in gold productionsales volumes and prices. Revenuesales prices realized on silver. Revenues from mining operations are accounted for net of related smelting, refining, transportation and other charges.

The table below sets out net revenue,details revenues from mining operations, production volumes and sales volumes by metal:

 2010 2009 2008 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 (thousands)  


 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 (thousands of United States dollars)
Revenues from mining operations:              

Gold $1,216,249 $474,875 $227,576  $1,712,666 $1,563,760 $1,216,249 

Silver 104,544 59,155 59,398  140,221 171,725 104,544 

Zinc 77,544 57,034 54,364  45,797 70,522 77,544 

Copper 22,219 22,571 27,600  19,018 14,451 22,219 

Lead 1,965 127   12 1,341 1,965 

 $1,422,521 $613,762 $368,938  $1,917,714 $1,821,799 $1,422,521 


Production volumes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (ounces) 987,609 492,972 276,762  1,043,811 985,460 987,609 

Silver (000s ounces) 5,305 4,035 4,079  4,646 5,080 4,812 

Zinc (tonnes) 62,544 56,186 65,755  38,637 54,894 62,544 

Copper (tonnes) 4,224 6,671 6,922  4,126 3,216 4,224 


Sales volumes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold (ounces) 973,057 463,660 258,601  1,028,062 996,090 973,057 

Silver (000s ounces) 4,722 3,871 4,023  4,556 5,089 4,722 

Zinc (tonnes) 59,566 58,391 62,653  42,604 54,499 59,566 

Copper (tonnes) 4,223 6,689 6,913  4,115 3,194 4,223 

RevenueRevenues from gold sales increased by $741.4$148.9 million, or 156%10%, in 2010.2012 compared with 2011. Gold production increased by 6% to 987,6091,043,811 ounces in 2010, up 100%2012 from 492,972985,460 ounces in 2009. This2011. A 35% increase is attributable to the full year of commercial production at the Kittila, Lapa and Pinos Altos Mines during 2010 and the commencement ofin gold production at the Meadowbank Mine during March 2010. Realizedmine due to higher gold pricesgrades and ore milled and increases in gold grades at the LaRonde and Kittila mines were the primary contributors to the Company's overall gold production increase in 2012 compared with 2011. Partially offsetting these increases in gold production was the absence of production from the Goldex mine project in 2012 due to the suspension of mining operations at the GEZ on October 19, 2011. Average realized gold price increased 22% in 20106% to $1,250 per ounce from $1,024$1,667 per ounce in 2009.2012 from $1,573 per ounce in 2011.

Silver revenue increasedRevenues from silver sales decreased by $45.4$31.5 million, or 77%18%, in 2010 when2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to 2009 due to an increase in thea lower realized salessilver price and increased production. Revenue from zinc sales increased by $20.5 million, or 36%, in 2010 when compared to 2009. The increase in zinc revenue was mainly due to an increase in realized zinc sales prices. Revenue from

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            79

Table of Contents



copper sales was relatively constant when compared to the previous year. However, the realized sales prices for copper in 2010 were 33% higher than 2009, which was offset by lower copper production.

Interestsilver grade and Sundry Income

Interest and sundry income consists mainly of interest on cash balances and premiums on call options written on available-for-sale securities held by the Company. Interest and sundry income was $10.3 million in 2010 compared to $12.6 million in 2009.

Available-for-sale Securities

From time to time, the Company takes minority equity positions in other mining and exploration companies. As part of the Company's procedures to assess whether the value of its available-for-sale securities portfolio was reasonable for accounting purposes, it was determined (in accordance with the requirements of ASC 320 Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities") that a non-cash write-down was required in 2008. These write-downs do not necessarily reflect management's long-term outlook on the value of the securities, but rather an "other-than-temporary" impairment as defined in ASC 320. In 2010 and 2009, this determination resulted in no write-downs relating to its various investments as compared to $74.8 million of write-downs in 2008.

In 2010, the sale of various available-for-sale securities resulted in a gain before taxes of $19.5 million compared to $10.1 million in 2009. Also during 2010, there was a net gain on the acquisition of Comaplex, of $57.5 million. The gain was driven by the mark-to-market gain on the shares of Comaplex purchased prior to the announcement of the acquisition that were accumulated within other comprehensive income and have now reversed through the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, partially offset by the costs of acquisition.

Production Costs

In 2010, total production costs were $677.5 million compared to $306.3 million in 2009. This increase is due to significantly higher (100%) production with the full year of production at the Kittila, Lapa and Pinos Altos Mines and ten months of production at the Meadowbank Mine which achieved commercial production during March 2010. The table below sets out the components of production costs:

   2010  2009  2008 
  
   (thousands) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production Costs          

LaRonde $189,146 $164,221 $166,496 

Goldex  61,561  54,342  20,366 

Kittila  87,740  42,464   

Lapa  66,199  33,472   

Pinos Altos  90,293  11,819   

Meadowbank  182,533     

Production costs per Consolidated Statement of Income $677,472 $306,318 $186,862 

Production costssilver mill recoveries at the LaRonde Mine during 2010 were $189.1 million, an increase of approximately 15% as compared to 2009. During 2010, LaRonde processed an average of 7,102 tonnes of ore per day, compared to 6,975 tonnes of ore per day during 2009. Minesite costs per tonne were C$79 in the fourth quarter of 2010, compared to C$69 in the fourth quarter of 2009. For the full year, the minesite costs per tonne were C$75 compared with C$72 per tonne in 2009. The increase in minesite costs per tonne during 2010 is attributable to a general cost escalation in the mining industry (including labour and input costs).

Production costs at the Goldex Mine were $61.6 million compared to $54.3 million in 2009. The increase is due to increased production and a stronger Canadian dollar. During 2010, Goldex processed an average of 7,621 tonnes of oremine. Revenues from zinc sales

8092            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



per day, abovedecreased by $24.7 million, or 35%, to $45.8 million in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to lower zinc grades at the 2009LaRonde mine. Revenues from copper sales increased by $4.6 million, or 32%, in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to higher realized copper sales prices between periods and higher copper grades at the LaRonde mine.

Production Costs

In 2012, total production costs were $897.7 million compared with $876.1 million in 2011. This increase is due primarily to a 28% increase in throughput at the Meadowbank mine between 2011 and 2012 made possible by the addition of a secondary crusher in June 2011 and improved equipment availability. The overall increase in production costs was partially offset by the suspension of mining operations at the Goldex mine on October 19, 2011.

The table below details production costs by mine:

Production Costs 2012 2011 2010 

  (thousands of United States dollars)
LaRonde mine $225,647 $209,947 $189,146 

Goldex mine  56,939 61,561 

Lapa mine 73,376 68,599 66,199 

Kittila mine 98,037 110,477 87,740 

Pinos Altos mine 152,942 145,614 90,293 

Meadowbank mine 347,710 284,502 182,533 

Production costs per consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) $897,712 $876,078 $677,472 

Production costs at the LaRonde mine were $225.6 million in 2012, an increase of 7% compared with 2011 production costs of $209.9 million. During 2012, the LaRonde mine processed an average production of 7,1646,444 tonnes of ore per day compared with 6,592 tonnes of ore per day during 2011. The decrease in throughput between periods was due primarily to heat and design capacity of 7,000 tonnes per day.congestion challenges associated with ore sourced from the deeper LaRonde mine extension. Minesite costs per tonne were C$98 in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with C$79 in the fourth quarter of 2011. For the full year 2012, minesite costs per tonne were C$95 compared with C$84 per tonne in 2011. The increase in minesite costs per tonne in 2012 compared with 2011 is attributable primarily to lower throughput and general cost increases.

Production costs at the Goldex mine were nil in 2012 compared with $56.9 million in 2011. The absence of production costs in 2012 is a result of the suspension of Goldex mine operations on October 19, 2011. Minesite costs per tonne were nil in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to C$21 in the fourth quarter of 20102011 when the surface stockpile that remained after the suspension of mining operations was milled. For the full year 2012, minesite costs per tonne were nil compared with C$21 per tonne in 2011.

Production costs at the Lapa mine were $73.4 million in 2012, an increase of 7% compared with 2011 production costs of $68.6 million. During 2012, the Lapa mine processed an average of 1,749 tonnes of ore per day, an increase of 3% over the 1,701 tonnes of ore per day processed during 2011. The increase in throughput between 2011 and 2012 was due primarily to improved maintenance scheduling and mill optimization. Minesite costs per tonne were C$23113 in the fourth quarter of 2009.2012 compared with C$117 in the fourth quarter of 2011. For the full year the2012, minesite costs per tonne were up slightly but essentially unchanged at C$22115 compared with C$23110 per tonne in 2009.

Both the Kittila and Lapa Mines achieved commercial production in May 2009. The Pinos Altos Mine achieved commercial production in November 2009.2011.

Production costs at the Kittila Mine during 2010mine were $87.7 million compared to $42.5$98.0 million in 2009. The increase is mainly due to2012, a full yeardecrease of 11% compared with 2011 production in 2010.costs of $110.5 million. During 2010,2012, the Kittila mine processed an average of 2,6312,979 tonnes of ore per day, abovean increase of 5% over the 2009 average production of 2,0572,824 tonnes of ore per day processed during 2011 due primarily to the 2009 ramping-up period. The processing design capacity of the Kittila mill is approximately 3,000 tonnes per day. The underachievementan increase in actual processing versus capacity was mainly due to the bottleneck effect caused by the autoclave problems and shutdowns of the mill.availability. Minesite costs per tonne were €79€69 in the fourth quarter of 20102012 compared to €46with €80 in the fourth quarter of 2009.2011. For the full year the2012, minesite costs per tonne were €66,€69 compared with €54€75 per tonne in 2009. The increase in minesite2011 due primarily to increased contractor efficiencies and to relatively lower costs per tonne during 2010 is attributable toassociated with mining the combination of labour and contractor cost increase, autoclave issues as well as the commencement of underground production which was ramped-up during 2010.

Production costs at the Lapa Mine during 2010 amounted to $66.2 million compared to $33.5 million in 2009. The increase is mainly due to a full year of production in 2010. During 2010, Lapa processed an average of 1,512 tonnes of ore per day, above the 2009 average production of 1,232 tonnes of ore per day due to the 2009 ramping-up period. The processing design capacityfinal benches of the Lapa mill is approximately 1,500 tonnes per day. Minesite costs per tonne were C$115 in the fourth quarter of 2010 compared to C$148 in the fourth quarter of 2009. For the full year, the minesite costs per tonne were C$114, compared with C$140 per tonne in 2009. The decrease in minesite costs per tonneopen pit during 2010 is attributable to the achievement of design efficiencies.

Production costs at the Pinos Altos Mine during 2010 were $90.3 million compared to $11.8 million in 2009. The increase is mainly due to a full year of production in 2010 versus two months of production in 2009. During 2010, Pinos Altos processed an average of 3,638 tonnes of ore per day, above the 2009 average production of 1,625 tonnes of ore per day due to the ramping-up period, but below design capacity of 4,000 tonnes per day. Minesite costs per tonne were $35 in the fourth quarter of 2010, compared to $27 in the fourth quarter of 2009. For the full year, the minesite costs per tonne were $35 compared with $27 per tonne in 2009. The increase in minesite costs per tonne during 2010 is mainly attributable to the additional hiring of contractors, the commencement of underground production during 2010, and the tailings filter issue.

During March 2010, the Meadowbank Mine achieved commercial production. Total production costs since March 1, 2010 were $182.5 million. The daily average of ore processing amounted to 6,653 tonnes per day, below its design capacity of 8,500 tonnes per day as the Meadowbank Mine continues to ramp up.2012.


Total Production Costs by Category

LOGO

In 2010, total cash costs per ounce of gold increased to $451 from $346 in 2009 and $162 in 2008. The total cash costs per ounce of $451 represents a weighted average over all the Company's producing mines. In 2010, the LaRonde Mine total cash costs per ounce were negative $7, the Goldex Mine total cash costs per ounce were $335, the Kittila Mine total cash costs per ounce were $657, the Lapa Mine total cash costs per ounce were $529, the Pinos Altos Mine total cash

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            8193

Table of Contents



Production costs at the Pinos Altos mine, including the Creston Mascota deposit, were $152.9 million in 2012, an increase of 5% compared with 2011 production costs of $145.6 million. During 2012, the Pinos Altos mine processed an average of 12,007 tonnes of ore per day, a decrease of 3% compared with the 12,355 tonnes of ore per day processed during 2011 due primarily to the temporary suspension of heap leach stacking at the Creston Mascota deposit in September 2012. Minesite costs per tonne were $46 in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with $24 in the fourth quarter of 2011. For the full year 2012, minesite costs per tonne were $31 compared with $27 per tonne in 2011. The increase in minesite costs per tonne between 2011 and 2012 is mainly attributable to the absence of lower cost heap leach tonnes processed from the Creston Mascota deposit during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Production costs at the Meadowbank mine were $347.7 million in 2012, an increase of 22% compared with 2011 production costs of $284.5 million. During 2012, the Meadowbank mine processed an average of 10,440 tonnes of ore per day, an increase of 28% over the 8,158 tonnes of ore per day processed during 2011 due primarily to the June 2011 addition of the permanent secondary crusher and improvements in equipment availability and equipment maintenance. Minesite costs per tonne were C$90 in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with C$98 in the fourth quarter of 2011. For the full year 2012, minesite costs per tonne were C$88 compared with C$91 per tonne in 2011. The decrease in minesite costs per tonne between 2011 and 2012 is mainly attributable to a reduction in waste tonnes moved under the revised Meadowbank mine plan and overall productivity gains.

Total Production Costs by Category

LOGO

Total cash costs per ounce were $425of gold produced, representing the weighted average of all of the Company's producing mines, increased to $640 in 2012 from $580 in 2011 and $451 in 2010. At the Meadowbank MineLaRonde mine, total cash costs per ounce were $693.of gold increased from $77 in 2011 to $569 in 2012 due primarily to significantly lower byproduct revenue as the mine transitions to ore sourced from lower levels, and previously noted challenges with heat and congestion at the deeper levels. Total cash costs per ounce are comprised of minesitegold at the Goldex mine were $401 in 2011 until the suspension of operations on October 19, 2011. At the Lapa mine, total cash costs incurred duringper ounce of gold increased from $650 in 2011 to $697 in 2012 due to general mining industry cost increases. At the periodKittila mine, total cash costs per ounce of gold decreased from $739 in 2011 to $565 in 2012 due primarily to a 23% increase in gold production and forimproved efficiencies in the LaRondeuse of consumables and Pinos Altos Mines, reduced by their related net byproduct revenue.contractors. Total cash costs per ounce are affected by various factors such as the quantity of gold produced, operating costs, Canadian dollar/US dollar exchange rates, Euro/US dollar exchange rates and Mexican peso/US dollar exchange rates and, at the LaRonde and Pinos Altos mines,mine, including the quantityCreston Mascota deposit, decreased from $299 in 2011 to $286 in 2012 due primarily to increased production between these periods. Despite the temporary suspension of byproduct metals produced and byproduct metal prices. For 2010,heap leach operations at the Company decided to reportCreston Mascota deposit effective October 1, 2012, gold production increased by 30,457 ounces at the Pinos Altos mine overall in 2012 compared with 2011. At the Meadowbank mine, total cash costs using the more common industry practiceper ounce of deferring certain stripping costs that can be attributedgold decreased from $1,000 in 2011 to future production. The methodology is$913 in line with the Gold Institute Production Cost Standard. The purpose of adjusting for these stripping costs is2012 due primarily to enhance the comparability of cash costsincreased gold production and to the majoritysuccessful implementation of the Company's peers within the mining industry. The previous period's cash costs have also been adjusted to allow for comparability.revised mine plan in 2012.

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. ManagementThis measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for byproduct revenues, unsold concentrate inventory production costs, non-cash reclamation provisions, deferred stripping costs and other adjustments, and then dividing by the number of ounces of gold produced. The Company believes that this generally accepted industry measure is a realistic indication of operating performance and is a useful in allowing year-over-year comparisons. This measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as shown in the Consolidated Statementscomparison point between

94            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Income and Comprehensive Income for net byproduct revenues, royalties, inventory adjustments, certain stripping costs that can be attributed to future production and asset retirement provisions and then dividing by the number of ounces of gold produced.Contents



periods. Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is intended to provide investors with information about the cash generating capabilities of the Company's mining operations. Management also uses this measure to monitor the performance of the Company's mining operations. SinceAs market prices for gold are quoted on a per ounce basis, using this per ounce measure allows management to assess a mine's cash generating capabilities at various gold prices. Management is aware that this per ounce measure of performance is affectedcan be impacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates. Management compensates for thethese inherent limitations inherent in this measure by using itthis measure in conjunction with minesite costs per tonne (discussed below) as well as other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Management also performs sensitivity analyses in order to quantify the effects of fluctuating metal prices and exchange rates.

The World Gold Council and its members are working to develop a new production cost measure, potentially termed "all-in sustaining cash costs". The Company will work with the World Gold Council and its members to define and endorse this new measure, expected to be finalized in 2013.

Minesite costs per tonne is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. This measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as shown in the Consolidated Statementconsolidated statements of Incomeincome (loss) and Comprehensive Incomecomprehensive income (loss) for unsold concentrate inventory production costs, non-cash reclamation provisions, deferred stripping costs and other adjustments, and then dividing by tonnes of ore processed. As the total cash costs per ounce of gold produced measure can be impacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates, management believes that the minesite costs per tonne measure provides additional information regarding the performance of mining operations. Management is aware that this per tonne measure of performance can be impacted by fluctuations in production levels and compensates for this inherent limitation by using this measure in conjunction with production costs prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

The Company reports total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne using a common industry practice of deferring certain stripping costs that can be attributed to future production. The purpose of adjusting for these stripping costs is to enhance the comparability of total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne to the Company's peers within the mining industry.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne to production costs as presented in the consolidated statements of income (loss) and asset retirementcomprehensive income (loss) in accordance with US GAAP.

Total Production Costs by Mine

  2012 2011 2010 
  
  (thousands of United States dollars)
Production costs per consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) $897,712 $876,078 $677,472 

LaRonde mine 225,647 209,947 189,146 

Goldex mine  56,939 61,561 

Lapa mine 73,376 68,599 66,199 

Kittila mine 98,037 110,477 87,740 

Pinos Altos mine(i) 146,503 145,614 90,293 

Meadowbank mine 347,710 284,502 182,533 

Total $891,273 $876,078 $677,472 

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            95

Table of Contents


Reconciliation of Production Costs to Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced by Mine

LaRonde Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $225,647 $209,947 $189,146  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (131,750) (194,000) (192,155) 

Inventory and other adjustments(ii)  107  (2,309) 3,287  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (2,422) (4,062) (1,344) 

Cash operating costs $91,582 $9,576 $(1,066) 

Gold production (ounces)  160,875  124,173  162,806  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iii) $569 $77 $(7) 

Goldex Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $ $56,939 $61,561  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges    395  727  

Inventory and other adjustments(ii)    (2,778) (253) 

Non-cash reclamation provision    (173) (216) 

Cash operating costs $ $54,383 $61,819  

Gold production (ounces)    135,478  184,386  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iii) $ $401 $335  

Lapa Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $73,376 $68,599 $66,199  

Adjustments:        ��  

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  513  663  644  

Inventory and other adjustments(ii)  (71) 631  (4,683) 

Non-cash reclamation provision  191  (348) (57) 

Cash operating costs $74,009 $69,545 $62,103  

Gold production (ounces)  106,191  107,068  117,456  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iii) $697 $650 $529  

96            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Kittila Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $98,037 $110,477 $87,740  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  391  152  252  

Inventory and other adjustments(ii)  1,564  (1,267) (4,774) 

Non-cash reclamation provision  (551) (206) (334) 

Stripping costs(iv)    (3,018)   

Cash operating costs $99,441 $106,138 $82,884  

Gold production (ounces)  175,878  143,560  126,205  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iii) $565 $739 $657  

Pinos Altos Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced(i)  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $146,503 $145,614 $90,293  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (69,478) (60,653) (25,052) 

Inventory and other adjustments(ii)  2,658  1,871  2,925  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (764) (1,372) (858) 

Stripping costs(iv)  (12,762) (24,260) (11,857) 

Cash operating costs $66,157 $61,200 $55,451  

Gold production (ounces)  231,277  204,380  130,431  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iii) $286 $299 $425  

Meadowbank Mine – Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold Produced  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $347,710 $284,502 $182,533  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (1,651) (546) (584) 

Inventory and other adjustments(ii)  4,582  (1,670) 6,911  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (1,611) (1,679) (1,315) 

Stripping costs(iv)  (14,806) (9,746) (4,321) 

Cash operating costs $334,224 $270,861 $183,224  

Gold production (ounces)  366,030  270,801  264,576  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce)(iii) $913 $1,000 $693  

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            97

Table of Contents


Reconciliation of Production Costs to Minesite Costs per Tonne by Mine

LaRonde Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $225,647 $209,947 $189,146  

Adjustments:           

Inventory adjustment(v)  984  (22) 3,287  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (2,421) (4,062) (1,344) 

Minesite operating costs $224,210 $205,863 $191,089  

Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) $225,159 $202,957 $194,993  

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes)  2,359  2,406  2,592  

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vi) $95 $84 $75  

Goldex Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $ $56,939 $61,561  

Adjustments:           

Inventory adjustment(v)    (2,407) (253) 

Non-cash reclamation provision    (173) (216) 

Minesite operating costs $ $54,359 $61,092  

Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) $ $53,208 $62,545  

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes)    2,477  2,782  

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vi) $ $21 $22  

Lapa Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $73,376 $68,599 $66,199  

Adjustments:           

Inventory adjustment(v)  54  1,071  (4,683) 

Non-cash reclamation provision  191  (348) (57) 

Minesite operating costs $73,621 $69,322 $61,459  

Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) $73,813 $68,403 $62,771  

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes)  641  621  552  

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vi) $115 $110 $114  

98            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Kittila Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $98,037 $110,477 $87,740  

Adjustments:           

Inventory adjustment(v)  1,569  (1,324) (4,774) 

Non-cash reclamation provision  (551) (206) (334) 

Stripping costs(iv)    (3,018)   

Minesite operating costs $99,055 $105,929 $82,632  

Minesite operating costs (thousands of €) 75,305 76,817 63,464  

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes)  1,090  1,031  960  

Minesite costs per tonne (€)(vi) 69 75 66  

Pinos Altos Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne(i)  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $146,503 $145,614 $90,293  

Adjustments:           

Inventory adjustment(v)  2,755  (169) 2,925  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (764) (1,372) (858) 

Stripping costs(iv)  (12,762) (24,260) (11,857) 

Minesite operating costs $135,732 $119,813 $80,503  

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes)  4,316  4,509  2,318  

Minesite costs per tonne (US$)(vi) $31 $27 $35  

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            99

Table of Contents


Meadowbank Mine – Minesite Costs per Tonne  2012  2011  2010  

   (thousands of United States dollars, except as noted)
Production costs $347,710 $284,502 $182,533  

Adjustments:           

Inventory adjustment(v)  4,407  253  6,911  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (1,610) (1,679) (1,315) 

Stripping costs(iv)  (14,806) (9,746) (4,321) 

Minesite operating costs $335,701 $273,330 $183,808  

Minesite operating costs (thousands of C$) $336,431 $272,157 $190,980  

Tonnes of ore milled (thousands of tonnes)  3,821  2,978  2,001  

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(vi) $88 $91 $95  

Notes:

(i)
Includes the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos, except for fourth quarter 2012 total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne, as heap leach operations at the Creston Mascota deposit were suspended effective October 1, 2012.

(ii)
Under the Company's revenue recognition policy, revenue is recognized on concentrates when legal title passes. As total cash costs per ounce of gold produced are calculated on a production basis, this inventory adjustment reflects the sales margin on the portion of concentrate production not yet recognized as revenue.

(iii)
Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. This measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for byproduct revenues, unsold concentrate inventory production costs, non-cash reclamation provisions, deferred stripping costs and other adjustments, and then dividing by the number of ounces of gold produced. The Company believes that this generally accepted industry measure is a realistic indication of operating performance and is a useful comparison point between periods. Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced is intended to provide investors with information about the cash generating capabilities of the Company's mining operations. Management also uses this measure to monitor the performance of the Company's mining operations. As market prices for gold are quoted on a per ounce basis, using this per ounce measure allows management to assess a mine's cash generating capabilities at various gold prices. Management is aware that this per ounce measure of performance can be impacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates. Management compensates for these inherent limitations by using this measure in conjunction with minesite costs per tonne (discussed below) as well as other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Management also performs sensitivity analyses in order to quantify the effects of fluctuating metal prices and exchange rates.

(iv)
The Company reports total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne using a common industry practice of deferring certain stripping costs that can be attributed to future production. The purpose of adjusting for these stripping costs is to enhance the comparability of total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne to the Company's peers within the mining industry.

(v)
This inventory adjustment reflects production costs associated with unsold concentrates.

(vi)
Minesite costs per tonne is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. This measure is calculated by adjusting production costs as shown in the consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) for unsold concentrate inventory production costs, non-cash reclamation provisions, deferred stripping costs and other adjustments, and then dividing by tonnes of ore processed throughmilled. As the mill. Since total cash costs per ounce dataof gold produced measure can be affectedimpacted by fluctuations in byproduct metalsmetal prices and exchange rates, and other adjusting items, management believes thisthat the minesite costs per tonne measure provides additional information regarding the performance of mining operations, and allows management to monitor operating costs on a more consistent basis aseliminating the per tonne measure eliminates the cost variability associated withimpact of varying production levels. Management also uses this measure to determine the economic viability of mining blocks. As each mining block is evaluated based on the net realizable value of each tonne mined, in order to be economically viable the estimated revenue on a per tonne basis must be in excess of the minesite costs per tonne. Management is aware that this per tonne measure is affectedof performance can be impacted by fluctuations in productionprocessing levels and thus usescompensates for this inherent limitation by using this measure as an evaluation tool in conjunction with production costs prepared in accordance with US GAAP. This measure supplements

Exploration and Corporate Development Expense

Proven and probable gold reserves totalled 18.7 million ounces at December 31, 2012 compared with 18.8 million ounces at December 31, 2011. The decrease in proven and probable gold reserves was due primarily to 2012 gold production cost information prepared in accordance with US GAAPat the Company's operating mines and allows investors to distinguish between changes in production costs resulting from changes in levels of production versus changes in operating performance.was almost entirely offset by newly declared proven and probable reserves at the Goldex and La India mine projects and at the Meliadine project.

Both of these non-US GAAP measures used should be considered together with other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP, and noneA summary of the measures taken by themselvesCompany's significant 2012 exploration and corporate development activities is necessarily indicativedetailed below:

82100            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The table below details exploration expense by region and total corporate development expense:

   2012  2011  2010 
  
   (thousands of United States dollars)
Canada $22,733 $29,885 $28,346 

Latin America  28,419  8,263  8,268 

United States  7,397  7,520  7,042 

Europe  7,458  6,332  4,569 

Goldex mine project  37,627  19,656   

Corporate development expense  5,866  4,065  6,733 

  $109,500 $75,721 $54,958 

Total Production Costs byAmortization of Property, Plant and Mine Development

   2010  2009  2008 
  
   (thousands, except as noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Total production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $677,472 $306,318 $186,862 

Attributable to LaRonde  189,146  164,221  166,496 

Attributable to Goldex  61,561  54,342  20,366 

Attributable to Lapa  66,199  33,472   

Attributable to Kittila  87,740  42,464   

Attributable to Pinos Altos  90,293  11,819   

Attributable to Meadowbank  182,533     

Total $677,472 $306,318 $186,862 

Amortization of property, plant and mine development expense increased to $271.9 million in 2012 compared with $261.8 million in 2011 due primarily to the achievement of commercial production at the LaRonde mine extension on December 1, 2011. Amortization expense commences once a mine or project achieves commercial production.

ReconciliationGeneral and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense increased to $119.1 million in 2012 from $107.9 million in 2011 due primarily to increases in salaries, benefits, retirement costs and legal expenses associated with securities class action lawsuits. Partially offsetting these increases, stock option expense decreased to $33.8 million in 2012, representing a 20% decrease compared with 2011, due to a decrease in the Black-Scholes calculated value of Total Cash Costs per Ouncethe employee stock options granted between periods.

Provincial Capital Tax

Prior to 2011, provincial capital tax was assessed on the Company's capitalization (paid-up capital and debt) less certain allowances and tax credits for exploration expenses incurred. Ontario capital tax was eliminated on July 1, 2010, while Quebec capital tax was eliminated at the end of Gold2010. Provincial capital tax expenses of $4.0 million and $9.2 million were recorded in 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to Production Costs by Minegovernment audit assessments relating to prior years. In 2010, the Company recorded a provincial capital tax recovery of $6.1 million due to non-recurring items relating to prior years. Provincial capital tax is expected to be nil going forward.

LaRonde Total Cash Costs per Ounce  2010  2009  2008  

   (thousands, except as noted)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $189,146 $164,221 $166,496  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (192,155) (138,262) (142,337) 

Inventory and other adjustments(i)  3,287  (3,809) 45  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (1,344) (1,198) (1,194) 

Cash operating costs $(1,066)$20,952 $23,010  

Gold production (ounces)  162,806  203,494  216,208  

Total cash costs (per ounce)(iii) $(7)$103 $106  

Goldex Total Cash Costs per Ounce  2010  2009  2008  

   (thousands, except as noted)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $61,561 $54,342 $20,366  

Adjustments:           

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  727      

Inventory and other adjustments(i)  (253) 383  (448) 

Non-cash reclamation provision  (216) (196) (72) 

Cash operating costs $61,819 $54,529 $19,846  

Gold production (ounces)  184,386  148,849  47,347  

Total cash costs (per ounce)(iii) $335 $366 $419  

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            83101

Table of Contents


Lapa Total Cash Costs per Ounce  2010  2009  2008 

   (thousands, except as noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $66,199 $33,472 $ 

Adjustments:          

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  644     

Inventory and other adjustments(i)  (4,683) 6,072   

Non-cash reclamation provision  (57) (25)  

Cash operating costs $62,103 $39,519 $ 

Gold production (ounces)  117,456  52,602   

Total cash costs (per ounce)(iii) $529 $751 $ 

Kittila Total Cash Costs per Ounce  2010  2009  2008 

   (thousands, except as noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $87,740 $42,464 $ 

Adjustments:          

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  252     

Inventory and other adjustments(i)  (4,774) 1,565   

Non-cash reclamation provision  (334) (254)  

Cash operating costs $82,884 $43,775 $ 

Gold production (ounces)  126,205  65,547   

Total cash costs (per ounce)(iii) $657 $668 $ 

Pinos Altos Total Cash Costs per Ounce  2010  2009  2008 

   (thousands, except as noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $90,293 $11,819 $ 

Adjustments:          

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (25,052) (625)  

Inventory adjustments(i)  2,925  (5,356)  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (858) (100)  

Stripping costs (capitalized vs expensed)(ii)  (11,857) (253)  

Cash operating costs $55,451 $5,485 $ 

Gold production (ounces)  130,431  9,634   

Total cash costs (per ounce)(iii) $425 $570 $ 

84            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITEDInterest Expense

TableIn 2012, interest expense increased to $57.9 million from $55.0 million in 2011 and $49.5 million in 2010. The table below details the components of Contentsinterest expense:

   2012  2011  2010  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars)
Stand-by fees on credit facilities $3,734 $7,345 $8,159  

Amortization of credit facilities, financing and note issuance costs  3,432  4,810  3,507  

Government interest, penalties and other  4,869  3,078  2,165  

Interest on credit facilities  3,460  1,764  10,795  

Interest on Notes  43,886  39,067  29,423  

Interest capitalized to construction in progress  (1,494) (1,025) (4,556) 

  $57,887 $55,039 $49,493  

Foreign Currency Translation Gain (Loss)


Meadowbank Total Cash Costs per Ounce  2010  2009  2008 

   (thousands, except as noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs per Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income $182,533 $ $ 

Adjustments:          

Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (584)    

Inventory adjustments(i)  6,911     

Non-cash reclamation provision  (1,315)    

Stripping costs (capitalized vs expensed)(ii)  (4,321)    

Cash operating costs $183,224 $ $ 

Gold production (ounces)  264,576     

Total cash costs (per ounce)(iii) $693 $ $ 

Reconciliation of Minesite Costs per Tonne to Production Costs by Mine

LaRonde Minesite Costs per Tonne  2010  2009  2008  

   (thousands, except as noted)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs $189,146 $164,221 $166,496  

Adjustments:           

Inventory and other adjustments(iv)  3,287  234  45  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (1,344) (1,198) (1,194) 

Minesite operating costs (US$) $191,089 $163,257 $165,347  

Minesite operating costs (C$) $194,993 $184,233 $176,893  

Tonnes of ore milled (000s tonnes)  2,592  2,546  2,639  

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(v) $75 $72 $67  

Goldex Minesite Costs per Tonne  2010  2009  2008  


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs $61,561 $54,342 $20,366  

Adjustments:           

Inventory and other adjustments(iv)  (253) 383  (448) 

Non-cash reclamation provision  (216) (196) (72) 

Minesite operating costs (US$) $61,092 $54,529 $19,846  

Minesite operating costs (C$) $62,545 $60,986 $23,224  

Tonnes of ore milled (000s tonnes)  2,782  2,615  851  

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(v) $22 $23 $27  

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            85

Table of Contents


Lapa Minesite Costs per Tonne  2010  2009  2008 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs $66,199 $33,472 $ 

Adjustments:          

Inventory and other adjustments(iv)  (4,683) 6,072   

Non-cash reclamation provision  (57) (26)  

Minesite operating costs (US$) $61,459 $39,518 $ 

Minesite operating costs (C$) $62,771 $42,055 $ 

Tonnes of ore milled (000s tonnes)  552  299   

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(v) $114 $140 $ 

Kittila Minesite Costs per Tonne  2010  2009  2008 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs $87,740 $42,464 $ 

Adjustments:          

Inventory and other adjustments(iv)  (4,774) 1,565   

Non-cash reclamation provision  (334) (254)  

Minesite operating costs (US$) $82,632 $43,775 $ 

Minesite operating costs (€) 63,464 30,568  

Tonnes of ore milled (000s tonnes)  960  563   

Minesite costs per tonne (€)(v) 66 54  

Pinos Altos Minesite Costs per Tonne  2010  2009  2008 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs $90,293 $11,819 $ 

Adjustments:          

Inventory and other adjustments(iv)  2,925  (5,356)  

Non-cash reclamation provision  (858) (100)  

Stripping costs (capitalized vs expensed)(ii)  (11,857) (253)  

Minesite operating costs (US$) $80,503 $6,110 $ 

Tonnes of ore milled (000s tonnes)  2,318  227   

Minesite costs per tonne (US$)(v) $35 $27 $ 

86            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Meadowbank Minesite Costs per Tonne  2010  2009  2008 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Production costs $182,533 $ $ 

Adjustments:          

Inventory and other adjustments(iv)  6,911     

Non-cash reclamation provision  (1,315)    

Stripping costs (capitalized vs expensed)(ii)  (4,321)    

Minesite operating costs (US$) $183,808 $ $ 

Minesite operating costs (C$) $190,980 $ $ 

Tonnes of ore milled (000s tonnes)  2,001     

Minesite costs per tonne (C$)(v) $95 $ $ 

Notes:

(i)
Under the Company's revenue recognition policy, revenue is recognized on concentrates when legal title passes. Since total cash costs per ounce are calculated on a production basis, this inventory adjustment reflects the sales margin on the portion of concentrate production for which revenue has not been recognized in the period.

(ii)
The Company has decided to report total cash costs per ounce using the more common industry practice of deferring certain stripping costs that can be attributed to future production. The methodology is in line with the Gold Institute Production Cost Standard. The purpose of adjusting for these stripping costs is to enhance the comparability of cash costs to the majority of the Company's peers within the mining industry. The previous period's cash costs have been adjusted for comparability purposes.

(iii)
Total cash costs per ounce is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. The Company believes that this generally accepted industry measure is a realistic indication of operating performance and is useful in allowing year over year comparisons. This measure is calculated by adjusting Production Costs as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for net byproduct metals revenues, stripping costs, royalties, inventory adjustments and asset retirement provisions. This measure is intended to provide investors with information about the cash generating capabilities of the Company's mining operations. Management uses this measure to monitor the performance of the Company's mining operations. Since market prices for gold are quoted on a per ounce basis, using this per ounce measure allows management to assess a mine's cash generating capabilities at various gold prices. Management is aware that this per ounce measure of performance can be impacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates. Management compensates for the limitation inherent with this measure by using it in conjunction with the minesite costs per tonne measure (discussed below) as well as other data prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Management also performs sensitivity analyses in order to quantify the effects of fluctuating metal prices and exchange rates.

(iv)
This inventory adjustment reflects production costs associated with unsold concentrates.

(v)
Minesite costs per tonne is not a recognized measure under US GAAP and this data may not be comparable to data presented by other gold producers. This measure is calculated by adjusting Production Costs as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for inventory and hedging adjustments, stripping costs and asset retirement provisions and then dividing by tonnes processed through the mill. Since total cash costs per ounce data can be affected by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices and exchange rates, management believes minesite costs per tonne provides additional information regarding the performance of mining operations and allows management to monitor operating costs on a more consistent basis as the per tonne measure eliminates the cost variability associated with varying production levels. Management also uses this measure to determine the economic viability of mining blocks. As each mining block is evaluated based on the net realizable value of each tonne mined, in order to be economically viable the estimated revenue on a per tonne basis must be in excess of the minesite costs per tonne. Management is aware that this per tonne measure is impacted by fluctuations in production levels and thus uses this evaluation tool in conjunction with production costs prepared in accordance with US GAAP. This measure supplements production cost information prepared in accordance with US GAAP and allows investors to distinguish between changes in production costs resulting from changes in production versus changes in operating performance.

The Company's operating results and cash flow are significantly affectedimpacted by changes in the US dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate, since four operating mines are located in Canada. Exchange rate movements can have a significant impact as all of the Company's revenues are earned in US dollars but most of its operating costs and a substantial portion of its capital costs are incurred in Canadian dollars. The US dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate has varied significantly over the past severalthree years. During the period from January 1, 2005 to2010 through December 31, 2010,2012, the daily noon buyingexchange rate as reported by the Bank of Canada has fluctuated frombetween C$1.300.94 per US$1.00 toand C$0.911.08 per US$1.00. In addition, a significant portion of the Company's expenditures at the Kittila Minemine and the Pinos Altos Minemine are denominated in Euros and Mexican pesos, respectively. Each of these currencies hasThe Euro and Mexican peso have also varied significantly against the US dollar over the past several years as well.three years.

A foreign currency translation loss of $16.3 million was recorded in 2012 compared with a foreign currency translation gain of $1.1 million in 2011. On average, the US dollar strengthened against the Canadian dollar, the Euro and the Mexican peso in 2012 compared with 2011. The US dollar weakened against the Canadian dollar, the Euro and the Mexican peso between December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012. The foreign currency translation loss in 2012 is due primarily to the impact of translation on liabilities denominated in Euros, Canadian dollars and Mexican pesos, offset partially by the impact of translation on non-US dollar cash balances.

ExplorationIncome and Corporate Development ExpenseMining Taxes

Exploration drilling during 2010 resultedIn 2012, the Company had an effective tax rate of 28.5% compared with 26.9% in an increase2011 and 23.7% in 2010. In 2012, the effective tax rate of 2.9 million ounces28.5% was higher than the statutory tax rate of gold contained in mineral reserves at the end of the year26.3% due to conversion frompermanent differences, principally stock-based compensation that is not deductible for tax purposes in Canada. In 2011, an income and mining taxes recovery was recorded due to impairment losses on the mineral resource category. In spite of this conversion, the mineral resources continuedMeadowbank and Goldex mines.

Supplies Inventories

Supplies inventories increased by 22% to grow marginally over 2009 levels$222.6 million at several of the mines by approximately 0.3December 31, 2012 compared with $182.4 million ounces.

Set out below is a summary of the significant exploration and corporate development activities undertaken in 2010:

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            87

Table of Contents


The table below sets out exploration expense by region and total corporate development expense:

   2010  2009  2008 
  
   (thousands) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Canada (except Meliadine) $18,423 $11,194 $7,966 

Meliadine  9,923     

Latin America  8,268  9,212  7,426 

United States  7,042  7,176  9,347 

Europe  4,569  5,325  7,017 

Corporate development expense  6,733  3,372  2,948 

  $54,958 $36,279 $34,704 

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expensessupplies inventories increased to $94.3 million in 2010 from $63.7 million in 2009. This was attributable to the increase of Quebec regional general and administrative expenses as this regional support division focused on new development projects in 2010 as compared to supporting the Company's construction projects in 2009, resulting in a $9.7 million increase from year to year. In addition, there was an increase in stock option expense due to a higher volume of stock options granted and an increase in the Black-Scholes calculated value of the options granted. Of the total general and administrative expenses, stock-based compensation was $38.1 million and $27.1 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Provincial Capital Taxes

These taxes are assessed on the Company's capitalization (paid-up capital and debt) less certain allowances and tax credits for exploration expenses incurred. Provincial capital taxes decreased to a recovery of $6.1 million in 2010 compared to an expense of $5.0 million in 2009 due to the reinstatement of previously disallowed Quebec resource credits. Ontario capital tax was eliminated on July 1, 2010, while Quebec capital tax was eliminated at the end of 2010. Therefore, the provincial capital tax expense is expected to be nil in 2011 and going forward.

Amortization Expense

The consolidated amortization expense for the year increased to $192.5 million in 2010, compared to $72.5 million in 2009, largely as a result of a full year of production at the Kittila, Lapa and Pinos Altos Mines during 2010 and the commencement of commercialLaRonde mines to facilitate increased gold production at the Meadowbank Mine during March 2010. Amortization expense commences once a mine achieves commercial production.levels and underground mining operations.

88Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2012, the Company's cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash totalled $332.0 million, compared with $221.5 million at December 31, 2011. Cash provided by operating activities increased by $28.8 million to $696.0 million in 2012 compared with 2011 due primarily to a 6% increase in both gold prices realized

102            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Interest Expense

In 2010, interest expense increased to $49.5 million from $8.4 millionand gold production. The increase in 2009 and $3.0 million in 2008. The table below shows the components of interest expense:

   2010  2009  2008  
  
   (thousands)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Stand-by fees on credit facilities $8,159 $2,730 $1,163  

Amortization of credit facilities financing and note issuance costs  3,507  2,392  1,192  

Government interest, penalties and other  2,165  3,326  597  

Interest on credit facilities  10,795  15,470  4,584  

Interest on notes  29,423      

Interest capitalized to construction in progress  (4,556) (15,470) (4,584) 

  $49,493 $8,448 $2,952  

Foreign Currency Translation Gain

The foreign currency translation loss was $19.5 million in 2010, compared to a loss of $39.8 million in 2009. The significant negative effect of exchange rates is attributable to the weakening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar and the Euro during 2010. The loss is mainly due to the impact on the foreign currency future tax liabilities and is partially off-setcash provided by the impact on cash balances in Canadian dollars and Swedish krona, the currency in which the Company's Swedish subsidiaries pay tax.

Income and Mining Taxes

In 2010, the effective accounting income and mining tax expense rate was 23.7%, compared to 19.9% in 2009 and 23.8% in 2008. There was one unusual item recognized in 2010, which reduced the effective tax rate from the statutory tax rate. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company executed the newly enacted Quebec foreign currency election to commence using the US dollar as its functional currency for Quebec income tax purposes. As the related tax legislation was enacted in the second quarter of 2010, this election applies to taxation years ended December 31, 2008 and subsequent. This election resulted in a deferred tax benefit of $21.8 million for the period ended December 31, 2010.

The beneficial unusual item above is partially offset by permanent differences, principally stock-based compensation that is not deductible for tax purposes in Canada and non-taxable foreign exchange losses. In addition, Quebec mining duties (current and deferred) increase the effective tax rate.

Supplies Inventory

The supplies inventory balance as of December 31, 2010 increased significantly to $149.6 million, compared to the December 31, 2009 balance of $100.9 million. This increase is mainly attributable to the build-up of supplies inventory at the Meadowbank Mine due to a full year of production and an increased consumption of supplies (including fuel) due to operating conditions and increased maintenance requirements. In addition, supplies inventory at the Pinos Altos Mine increased to support underground mining operations and operations at the Creston Mascota deposit.

During July 2010, the Company acquired Comaplex, whose sole asset at the time it was acquired was the Meliadine property located in Nunavut, Canada, 290 kilometres southeast of the Company's existing Meadowbank Mine. The Company expects to achieve efficiencies by leveraging experience gained from the development of the Meadowbank Mine, if it determines to build a mine at Meliadine. This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination under US GAAP and resulted in the recognition of $200.1 million in goodwill.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At the end of 2010, the Company's cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash totalled $104.6 million, compared to $163.6 million at the end of 2009. This decrease, which resulted from investing and financing activities was partially offset by operating activities. In 2010, casha $15.2 million increase in production costs and a $33.8 million increase in exploration and corporate development expenses between 2011 and 2012. Cash used in investing activities decreased significantly to

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            89

Table of Contents



$523.3 million from $587.6 $376.2 million in 2009. The investing activities2012 from $760.5 million in 2010 mainly consisted2011 due primarily to the acquisition of projectGrayd in November 2011, a decrease in available-for-sale securities investments, an increase in proceeds on available-for-sale securities and a decrease in capital expenditures at the Meadowbank Mine, the LaRonde Mine extension, the Creston Mascota deposit and sustaining capital expenditures at all of the Company's operating mines.between these periods. Cash flow provided by operating activities increased significantly to $483.5 million in 2010 from $115.1 million in 2009 mainly due to the full year of production from the Kittila, Lapa and Pinos Altos Mines and ten months of production from the Meadowbank Mine. In addition, higher realized sales prices for all metals, especially gold, also contributed to the increase of cash flow provided by operating activities. In 2010, cash used in financing activities increased to $21.9was $202.6 million in 2012 compared to 2009 whenwith cash provided fromby financing activities was $559.8 million. The cash providedof $178.8 million in 2011 due primarily to a change from financing activitiesnet proceeds from long-term debt of $270.0 million in 2009 was mainly attributable2011 to the banknet repayments of long-term debt drawdowns of $625.0 million.$290.0 million in 2012.

In 2010,2012, the Company invested $511.6cash of $445.6 million of cash in new projects and sustaining capital expenditures. MajorSignificant capital expenditures in 20102012 included $173.9$105.1 million on construction at the Meadowbank Mine, $62.0mine, $83.3 million on constructionat the Meliadine project, $39.2 million at the La India mine project, $26.8 million at the Goldex mine project and $183.7 million at the LaRonde, Mine extension, $43.4 million on construction at the Creston Mascota deposit and $225.0 million for sustaining capital expenditures at the LaRonde, Goldex, Kittila, Lapa and Pinos Altos Mines. The remaining capitaland Lapa mines. Capital expenditures to complete all of the Company's projectsgrowth initiatives are expected to be funded by cash provided by operating activities and cash on hand. A significant portion of the Company's cash and cash equivalents are denominated in US dollars.

During 2010,In 2012, the Company received net proceeds on available-for-sale securities equal to $36.6of $73.4 million compared with $9.4 million in 2011. Purchases of available-for-sale securities decreased to $48.3$2.7 million during 2009. Also during 2010,in 2012 compared with purchases of $91.1 million in 2011.

On November 26, 2012, the Company disposed of 7,795,574 shares of Queenston Mining Inc. for total proceeds of $42.6 million, recording a $16.5 million gain on sale of available-for-sale securities.

On July 27, 2011, the Company acquired 21,671,827 common shares of Rubicon Minerals Corporation ("Rubicon") for cash consideration of approximately $73.8 million. On June 1, 2012, the Company disposed of 11,000,000 common shares of Rubicon for total proceeds of $30.7 million, recording a $6.7 million loss on sale of available-for-sale securities. After closing the transaction, the Company holds 10,671,827 common shares of Rubicon.

On November 29, 2012, the Company purchased available-for-sale securitiesthe 5% net smelter returns royalty on the Probe block of the Goldex property from Probe for $42.5 million compared to $6.4 million in 2009.cash consideration of C$14.0 million. This amount was mainly duecapitalized to the 12.7% ownership position acquired in Queenston Mining Incorporated duringproperty, plant and mine development line item of the fourth quarterconsolidated balance sheets. Up to an additional C$4.0 million (in cash or common shares of 2010.the Company, at the election of Probe) may become payable by the Company to Probe if certain production thresholds are achieved on the Probe block of the Goldex property.

In 2010,On December 12, 2012, the Company declared its 29a cash dividend payable on March 15, 2013, marking the 31thst consecutive annualyear that the Company has paid a cash dividend. The dividend increased significantly to $0.64 per share from $0.18 per share in 2009. During the first quarter of 2010,2012, the Company paid out its 2009 dividend, amounting to $26.8 million.dividends of $118.1 million compared with $98.4 million in 2011. Although the Company expects to continue paying dividends, future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board and will be subject to factors such as income, financial condition and capital requirements. Also in 2010, theThe Company also issued common shares for gross proceeds of $84.7 million. This was mainly$32.7 million in 2012 due primarily to stock option exercises and issuances under the Company's employee share purchase plan.

In 2010,On July 24, 2012, the Company increased amounts availableclosed a private placement consisting of $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of guaranteed senior unsecured notes due in 2022 and 2024 (the "2012 Notes") with a weighted average maturity of 11.0 years and weighted average yield of 4.95%. Proceeds from the syndicate of banks that comprised its lenders from an aggregate of $900 million2012 Notes were used to $1.2repay amounts outstanding under the Company's 1.2 billion in a transaction under whichunsecured revolving bank credit facility.

On July 20, 2012, the Company also terminated one ofamended and restated its bank credit facilities (see note 4facility (as so amended, the "Credit Facility"). The total amount available under the Credit Facility remains unchanged at $1.2 billion; however, the maturity date was extended from June 22, 2016 to the Company's audited consolidated financial statements).

June 22, 2017. Pricing terms were amended to reflect improved current market conditions. As at December 31, 2010,2012, the Company had drawn $50.0$30.0 million from its bank credit facility.under the Credit Facility. In addition, the amountsamount available under the credit facility areCredit Facility is reduced by outstanding letters of credit drawn under the facility. Letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilityCredit Facility, amounting to $1.1 million at December 31, 2010 totalled $29.4 million. Accordingly,2012. Therefore, $1,168.9 million was available for future drawdown under the amount available to be borrowed asCredit Facility at December 31, 2010, was approximately $1.12 billion.2012. The credit facilityCredit Facility requires the Company to maintain specified financial ratios and meet financial condition covenants. These financial condition covenants were met as of December 31, 2010.2012.

The Company entered into a credit agreement on June 26, 2012 with a financial institution relating to a new C$150 million uncommitted letter of credit facility (the "Letter of Credit Facility"). The obligations of the Company under the Letter of Credit Facility are guaranteed by certain of its subsidiaries. The Letter of Credit Facility may be used to support the reclamation obligations or non-financial or performance obligations of the Company or its subsidiaries. As at December 31, 2012, $127.5 million had been drawn under the Letter of Credit Facility.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            103

Table of Contents


On April 7, 2010, the Company closed a private placement consisting of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of guaranteed senior unsecured notes due in 2017, 2020 and 2022 (the "2010 Notes") with a weighted average maturity of 9.84 years and weighted average yield of 6.59%. Proceeds from the offering of the 2010 Notes were used to repay amounts under the Company's then outstanding credit facilities.

In June 2009, the Company entered into a C$95 million financial security guarantee issuance agreement with Export Development Canada (the "EDC Facility"). Under the agreement, which matures in June 2014, Export Development Canada agreed to provide guarantees in respect of letters of credit issued on behalf of the Company in favour of certain beneficiaries in respect of obligations relating to the Meadowbank Mine.mine. As at December 31, 2010,2012, outstanding letters of credit drawn under the EDC Facility totalled C$75.6 million.totaled nil.

On April 7, 2010, the Company closed a note offering with institutional investors in the United States and Canada for a private placement of $600 million of guaranteed senior unsecured notes due in 2017, 2020 and 2022 (the "Notes"). The Notes have a weighted average maturity of 9.84 years and weighted average yield of 6.59%. Proceeds from the offering of Notes were used to repay amounts under the Company's then outstanding credit facilities.

90            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Agnico-Eagle's contractual obligations as at December 31, 20102012 are set outdetailed below:

Contractual Obligations Total Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 4-5 Years More than
5 Years
  Total Less than
1 Year
 1-3 Years 4-5 Years Thereafter 

 (millions) 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  (millions of United States dollars)
Letter of credit obligations $2.3 $ $2.3 $ $  $2.3 $ $2.3 $ $ 

Reclamation obligations(1) 179.6 2.0 4.7 6.4 166.5 
Reclamation obligations(i) 349.0 16.8 2.8 3.7 325.7 

Purchase commitments 61.8 10.3 13.7 8.9 28.9  63.6 12.3 19.5 9.5 22.3 

Pension obligations(2) 5.8 0.1 1.5 1.0 3.7 
Pension obligations(ii) 4.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 3.6 

Capital and operating leases 64.2 14.5 31.0 13.8 4.9  35.1 15.5 14.5 1.6 3.5 

Long-term debt repayment obligations(3) 650.0   50.0 600.0 
Long-term debt repayment obligations(iii) 830.0   145.0 685.0 

Total(4) $963.7 $26.9 $52.7 $80.1 $804.0 
Total(iv) $1,284.2 $44.7 $39.4 $160.0 $1,040.1 

Notes:

(1)(i)
Mining operations are subject to environmental regulations that require companies to reclaim and remediate land disturbed by mining operations. The Company has submitted closure plans to the appropriate governmental agencies which estimate the nature, extent and costs of reclamation for each of its mining properties. The estimated undiscounted cash outflows of these reclamation obligations are presented here. These estimated costs are recorded in the Company's consolidated financial statements on a discounted basis in accordance with ASC 410-20 – Asset Retirement Obligations (prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations") and ASC 410-30 – Environmental Obligations. See Note 5(a)6(a) to the audited consolidated financial statements.

(2)(ii)
The Company hasprovides a non-registered supplementary executive retirement compensation arrangement plansdefined benefit plan for certain senior officers (the "RCA Plans""Executives Plan") with certain executives.. The RCA Plans provideExecutives Plan provides pension benefits to each of these executivescertain senior officers equal to 2% of the executive'stheir final three-year average pensionable earnings for each year of service with the Company, less the annual pension payable under the Company's basic defined contribution pension plan. Payments under the RCA PlansExecutives Plan are secured by letter of credit from a Canadian chartered bank. The figures presented in this table have been actuarially determined.

(3)(iii)
For the purposes of the Company's obligations to repay amounts outstanding under its credit facility,Credit Facility, the Company has assumed that the indebtedness will be repaid at theits current expiry date of the credit facility.date.

(4)(iv)
The Company's estimated future positive cash flows are expected to be sufficient to satisfy the obligations set outdetailed above.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has the followingCompany's off-balance sheet arrangements:arrangements include operating leases of $7.6 million (see Note 13(b) to the audited consolidated financial statements) and $111.3 million of outstanding letters of credit for environmental and site restoration costs, custom credits, government grants and other general corporate purposes of $147.3 million of (see Note 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements). If the Company were to terminate these off-balance sheet arrangements, the penalties or obligations would be insignificant based on the Company's liquidity position, as outlined in the table below.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT104                        91AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


20112013 Liquidity and Capital Resources Analysis

The Company believes that it has sufficient capital resources to satisfy its 20112013 mandatory expenditure commitments (including the futurecontractual obligations set outdetailed above) and discretionary expenditure commitments. The following table sets outdetails expected future capital requirements and resources for 2011:2013:

   Amount 
  
   (millions) 

 

 

 

 

 
2011 Mandatory Commitments:    

Contractual obligations (from table above) $27 

Dividend payable (declared in 2010)  108 

Goldex government grant  3 

Total 2011 mandatory expenditure commitments $138 


2011 Discretionary Commitments:

 

 

 

 

Budgeted capital expenditures $313 

Total 2011 mandatory and discretionary expenditure commitments $451 


2011 Capital Resources:

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and short term investments (at December 31, 2010) $102 

Estimated 2011 operating cash flow  476 

Working capital (at December 31, 2010) (excluding cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments)  269 

Available under the Credit Facilities  1,121 

Total 2011 Capital Resources $1,968 

   Amount 
  
   (millions of
United States dollars)
 
2013 Mandatory Commitments:    

Contractual obligations (from table above) $44.7 

Dividends payable (declared in December 2012)  37.9 

Total 2013 mandatory expenditure commitments $82.6 


2013 Discretionary Commitments:

 

 

 

 

Budgeted capital expenditures $596.0 

Dividends payable (undeclared)  113.7 

Total 2013 discretionary expenditure commitments $709.7 

Total 2013 mandatory and discretionary expenditure commitments $792.3 


2013 Capital Resources:

 

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and short term investments (at December 31, 2012) $306.6 

Budgeted 2013 cash provided by operating activities  729.4 

Working capital, excluding cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments (at December 31, 2012)  320.0 

Available under the Credit Facility  1,168.9 

Total 2013 Capital Resources $2,524.9 

While the Company believes its capital resources will be sufficient to satisfy all 20112013 commitments (mandatory and discretionary), the Company may choose to decrease certain of its discretionary expenditure commitments, which includes its construction projectscertain capital expenditures and futureundeclared dividends, should extremely negativeunexpected financial circumstances arise in the future.

Outlook

The following section contains "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Please see "Preliminary Note – Forward-Looking Information" for a discussion of assumptions and risks relating to such statements and information.

Gold Production Growth

LaRonde Mine Extension

In 2011,2013, payable gold production at the LaRonde Minemine is expected to be approximately 157,200 ounces of177,000 ounces. Over the 2013 to 2015 period, annual average payable gold asproduction at the gold grade of the stopes scheduledLaRonde mine is expected to be mined does not increase until lateapproximately 214,000 ounces. Challenges associated with heat and congestion in the year, whenLaRonde mine extension, which achieved commercial production on December 1, 2011, have delayed the deeper, gold-rich oreramp up of production. Despite these challenges, overall gold production and throughput are expected to remain unchanged over the life of the LaRonde Mine extension will be accessed. mine.

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced at the LaRonde Mine in 2011mine are expected to be approximately $54$650 in 2013 compared with $569 in 2012, reflecting expectations of lower grades and lower metal prices for the assumption of significantly higher silver and copper prices (byproduct metal revenue)mine's byproducts going forward.

Over the 2012 to 2015 period, annual average gold production is expected to be approximately 290,000 ounces. Over the same period, total cash costs per ounce are expected to average approximately $381 as byproduct revenues are projected to decline significantly, largely due to lower zinc grades at depth. However, depending on prevailing byproduct prices over the next several years, the potential exists to

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            105

Table of Contents



extend the life of the upper mine by mining lower grade (predominantly zinc)

92            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



ore that becomes economic. The effect of this would likely be lower total cash costs per ounce due to the byproduct metal revenue.

Goldex Mine Project

The Goldex Minemine is anticipatedexpected to producecommence production from the M and E Zones in the second quarter of 2014. In 2014, payable gold production at the Goldex mine project is expected to be approximately 183,50049,000 ounces. Annual average payable gold production at the Goldex mine project is expected to be approximately 80,000 ounces of gold in 2011 at estimated total cash costs per ounce of approximately $349. This is in line with the total cash costs per ounce incurred in 2010 and compares favourably to 2009, which reflects the ongoing optimization efforts at the mine and improved throughput.

Over the period of 2012 through 2015, annual average gold productionproduced of approximately 179,000 ounces is expected, with total cash costs per ounce estimated to average approximately $344.

Due to exploration success in 2010, it is possible that the$900 over a mine life may be extended asof approximately three to four years. Exploration on several other satellite zones, including the deeper D-Zone is explored and quantified. Beginning in 2011, it is expected that a ramp will be driven below the current workings to facilitate additional drilling which would be incorporated in a feasibility study considering the extraction of this zone. The study is expected to be completed in mid-2013.

Kittila Mine

In 2011, the Kittila Mine is expected to produce approximately 149,700 ounces of gold, while from 2012 through 2015, it is expected to produce an average of 173,000 ounces per year. Total cash costs per ounce in 2011 are expected to be approximately $548 per ounce. From 2012 through 2015, total cash costs per ounce are expected to average approximately $501.

Reflecting the continued growth of the Kittila orebody, a feasibility study regarding an initial expansion is underway. The study, which will evaluateD Zone, has the potential for an expansion ofto extend mine life at least 50% in throughput, is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2011.Goldex.

Lapa Mine

GoldPayable gold production during 2011in 2013 is expected to be approximately 124,80097,000 ounces at estimated total cash costs per ounce of gold produced of approximately $518.$840. Over the period of 20122013 to 2014,2015 period, annual average payable gold production of approximately 119,00086,000 ounces is expected. 2014 is expected to be the last full year of payable gold production based on the current mine life. Additional exploration results expected in 2013 could potentially extend the Lapa mine's life.

Kittila Mine

In 2013, payable gold production at the Kittila mine is expected to be approximately 165,000 ounces, while annual average payable gold production of approximately 163,333 ounces is expected with totalbetween 2013 and 2015. Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced are expected to average $535. According to the current mine plan, the last year of the mine's lifebe approximately $660 in 2013 compared with $565 in 2012 as ore will be processed exclusively from the higher cost underground mine since the open pit mine was fully depleted in the fourth quarter of 2012. Further, a partial yeargradual decline in gold grade towards the average reserve grade is expected in 2013.

The Board has approved a capital expansion at the Kittila mine that is expected to result in a 750 tonne per day throughput capacity increase commencing in the second half of 2015. However,Current guidance for production at the Company will continue its exploration program at Lapa in 2011 and plans to extend the underground exploration drift to facilitate drilling along the trend to the east and at depth. These areas have not previously been explored. The drilling is intended to investigate the possibilityKittila mine includes 10,000 ounces of extending the mine life.payable gold production resulting from this capital expansion.

Pinos Altos Mine

TotalIn 2013, payable gold production in 2011at the Pinos Altos mine is expected to be approximately 199,000191,000 ounces, including 32,000 ounces from the Creston Mascota deposit. Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced of approximately $300 are expected in 2013 at the Pinos Altos mine, including the Creston Mascota deposit. Between 2013 and 2015, payable gold production is expected to average 152,000 ounces annually at the Pinos Altos mine and 46,333 ounces annually at the Creston Mascota deposit.

An increase in payable gold production is expected at the Pinos Altos mine in 2015 due to increased mill throughput from the completion of the underground shaft project.

Commercial production at the Creston Mascota deposit heap leach operation was achieved in March 2011. On September 30, 2012, a movement of leached ore from the upper lifts of the Creston Mascota deposit phase one leach pad was observed and active leaching was suspended. During the fourth quarter of 2012, further assessment suggested that the integrity of the phase one leach pad liner had been compromised by the September 30, 2012 event and further leaching on the phase one leach pad is not expected as a result. The Company expects production to commence from the Creston Mascota deposit phase two leach pad in the second quarter of 2013. Payable gold production forecasts reflect a buildup of inventory on the phase two leach pad and a related ramp up in production in 2013, with steady state operations commencing in 2014.

Meadowbank Mine

In 2013, payable gold production at the Meadowbank mine is expected to be approximately 360,000 ounces at estimated total cash costs per ounce of approximately $406. Over the period of 2012 to 2015, the mine (including production from the Creston Mascota deposit) is expected to produce an average of 230,000 ounces of gold per year. From 2012 through 2015, total cash costs per ounce are expected to average approximately $334.

Construction on the satellite Creston Mascota deposit was completed with the first gold production occurring during the fourth quarter of 2010. Commercial production at this heap leach operation is expected to be achieved in the first quarter of 2011.

The Company is evaluating alternatives with respect to increasing the underground mine capacity at Pinos Altos either through an additional production ramp or a production shaft. The study is expected to be completed near the end of 2011. In 2011, studies are continuing in regards to the development of several other satellite deposits on the Pinos Altos concession package including the Sinter, Cubiro and San Eligio zones. Exploration activities in 2011 will focus on conversion of current gold resources to reserves and extending the mine life.

Meadowbank Mine

Gold production in 2011 is expected to be approximately 361,600 ounces at estimated total cash costs per ounceproduced of approximately $597.$985. The Meadowbank mine is expected to produce an average of 399,000359,000 ounces of payable gold production per year from 2012 tobetween 2013 and 2015. From 2012 through 2015, total cash costs per ounce are expected to average approximately $511.

The Meadowbank Mine is still early in its life cycle (commercial production achieved March 2010) and as such continues to go throughmine experienced a number of start-up issues that are not uncommon forduring its first two years. However, forecasted annual payable gold production has increased significantly as a large, complexresult of improved operating performance achieved in 2012. The Company expects mill throughput of approximately 11,000 tonnes per day to be sustainable and remote mine. The 2011 production forecasthas extended the expected Meadowbank mine life to 2018.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT106                        93AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



reflects continued progressLa India Mine Project

The Board approved the construction and development of the La India mine project in resolving these start-up issues, and the installation of a permanent secondary crushing unit during the third quarter, whichSeptember 2012. The La India mine project is expected to resolve crushing issues, thereby reaching design capacitycommence operations in the second quarter of 8,500 tonnes per day.

2014. In early 2011, the kitchen facilities to support the employee camp2014, payable gold production at the Meadowbank Mine sustained extensive damage as a result of a fire. The fire was contained to the kitchen and there were no injuries sustained. Although processing and mining operations continue, the Company is assessing the potential impact on short-term production of any temporary reduction in personnel.

During the 2011 drilling season, conversion and expansion of the indicated and inferred resource around the southern end of the Goose deposit will remain the priority. In addition, the exploration program in 2011 will continue to focus on resource-to-reserve conversion and the expansion of resources and reserves at the Vault deposit where recent exploration has suggested that additional mineralization may have the potential to extend the life of the mine.

Meliadine Project

In July 2010, Agnico-Eagle completed the acquisition of the MeliadineLa India mine project near Rankin Inlet, Nunavut.

The initial reserve estimate is 2.6 million ounces of gold from 9.5 million tonnes grading 8.5 grams per tonne. It is expected that this reserve will continue to grow rapidly as the large gold resource is drilled extensively over the next 12 months. Pending further drilling, feasibility study and a determination by the company to commence mining operations, this large gold deposit could have first production as early as late in 2015 or early 2016. Approximately $65 million is expected to be spent on Meliadine in 2011.approximately 40,000 ounces. Annual average payable gold production at the La India mine project is expected to be approximately 90,000 ounces at total cash costs per ounce of gold produced of approximately $500 over a mine life of approximately nine years.

Growth Summary

With the achievement of commercial production of the Goldex Mine in 2008, Kittila, Lapa and Pinos Altos Minesmines in 2009, and the Meadowbank Minemine in March 2010, and the CompanyCreston Mascota deposit and LaRonde mine extension in 2011, Agnico-Eagle has completed its transformationtransformed from a one-mineone mine operation to a six-minefive mine company over the last four years, resulting in record annual payable gold reserves and record annual financial and operating results.production of 1,043,811 ounces in 2012. As the Company begins thecontinues its next five-year growth phase from itsthis expanded production platform, it willexpects to continue to deliver on its vision and growth strategy. In 2010,Annual payable gold production increased significantly by 100% from 2009 levels to 987,609 ounces and in 2011, the Company is anticipating that total gold production will grow to between approximately 1.13 and 1.23 million ounces. Based on exploration results to date and planned exploration programs in 2011, the Company believes it is well positioned to potentially have several five-million-ounce gold deposits. The Company's goal isexpected to increase gold reserves from its existing portfolio of mines and development projects, exceeding 22 millionto approximately 1,207,000 ounces by year-end 2011. Further internal growth opportunities are expected to add to production post-2011. In summary, thein 2015, representing a 16% increase compared with 2012. The Company anticipatesexpects that the main contributors to the targeted increaseincreases in payable gold production, gold reserves and increases to gold resources couldwill include:

94            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Financial Outlook

Mining Revenue and Production Costs

In 2011,2013, the Company expects to continue to generate strong cash flow aswith payable gold production volumes are expectedbetween 970,000 and 1,010,000 ounces, down from 1,043,811 ounces in 2012 due primarily to increase by approximately 18% to between 1.13 million ouncesmine sequencing and 1.23 million ounces due to relatively steady productionthe temporary suspension of heap leach operations at the LaRonde, Goldex,Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos and Lapa Mines and the ramping up to designed capacity at the Kittila and Meadowbank Mines. Metal prices will have a large impact on financial results and, although the Company cannot predict the prices that will be realized in 2011, gold prices in early 2011 (to March 18, 2011) have remained strong. On March 18, 2011, the gold spot price closed at an all time record high of $1,438 per ounce.effective October 1, 2012.

The table below sets outdetails actual payable production for 2010in 2012 and estimated payable production in 2011.2013.

 2011 Estimate 2010 Actual 
 
 2013 Estimate 2012 Actual 


 

 

 

 

 
 
Gold (ounces) 1,175,800 987,609  970,000 - 1,010,000 1,043,811 

Silver (000s ounces) 6,224 5,305 
Silver (thousands of ounces) 4,300 4,646 

Zinc (tonnes) 71,800 62,544  23,000 38,637 

Copper (tonnes) 4,386 4,224  4,900 4,126 

For 2011,In 2013, the Company is expecting total cash costs per ounce at the LaRonde Minemine to be $54$650 compared to negative $7with $569 in 2010.2012. In calculating estimates of total cash costs per ounce of gold produced for the LaRonde mine, net silver, zinc and copper revenue isare treated as a reduction ofto production costs, and thereforecosts. Therefore, production and price assumptions for thesebyproduct metals play an important role in these estimates for the LaRonde Mine,mine's total cash costs per ounce of gold produced estimate due to its large byproduct production.production relative to the Company's other mines. An increase in byproduct metal prices above forecast levels would result in improved total cash costs per ounce of gold produced for the LaRonde Mine.mine. In addition, the Pinos Altos Minemine contains a significant byproduct silver.amount of silver byproduct.

In 2011,2013, total cash costs per ounce of gold produced at the Goldex,Lapa, Kittila, Lapa, Pinos Altos (including the Creston Mascota deposit) and the Meadowbank Minesmines are expected to be $349, $548, $518, $406$840, $660, $300 and $597,$985, respectively. As production costs at the LaRonde, Goldex, Lapa and Meadowbank Minesmines are denominated mostlyprimarily in Canadian dollars, the production costs at the Kittila Minemine are denominated mostlyprimarily in Euros and thea portion of production costs at the Pinos Altos Minemine are denominated mostly in Mexican pesos, the Canadian dollar/US dollar, Euro/US dollar and Mexican peso/US dollar exchange rates also affectimpact the total cash costs per ounce of gold produced estimates. The foreign exchange rates have been trending unfavorably for the Company as the US dollar has depreciated relative to these currencies since late 2010.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            107

Table of Contents


The table below sets outdetails the metal price assumptions and exchange rate assumptions used in deriving the estimated 2013 total cash costs per ounce for 2011of gold produced (production estimates for each metal are shown in the table above) as well as the market average closing prices for each variable for the period of January 1, to2013 through March 18, 2011.12, 2013.

   Cash Cost
Assumptions
  Market
Average
 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Silver (per ounce) $22.00 $31.01 

Zinc (per tonne) $2,100 $2,402 

Copper (per tonne) $8,000 $9,661 

C$/US$ exchange rate $1.0300 $0.9871 

Euro/US$ exchange rate $0.7692 $0.7350 

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            95

Table of Contents


   Cash Cost
Assumptions
  Market
Average
 
  
Silver (per ounce) $34.00 $30.43 

Zinc (per tonne) $2,000 $2,060 

Copper (per tonne) $7,500 $8,003 

C$/US$ exchange rate (C$) $1.00 $1.00 

Euro/US$ exchange rate (Euros) 0.77 0.75 

Mexican peso/US$ exchange rate (Mexican pesos)  13.00  12.70 

The table below sets outdetails the estimated approximate sensitivity of the Company's 20112013 estimated total cash costs per ounce of gold produced to a change in metal price and exchange rate assumptions:

Change in variable(i) Impact on
total cash
costs
  Impact on
Total Cash Costs
per Ounce of
Gold Produced
 

$1 per ounce of Silver $4 
 ($/oz.) 
$100 per tonne of Zinc $2 


$200 per tonne of Copper $1 


 

 

 

1% C$/US$ $5  $7 

1% Euro/US$ $1  $1 

$100/per tonne of Zinc $6 
1% Mexican peso/US$ $1 



$1/oz Silver $5 

$200/per tonne of Copper $1 

Note:

(i)
The sensitivities presented are based on the payable production, metal price and priceexchange rate assumptions set outdetailed above. Operating costs are not affectedimpacted by fluctuations in byproduct metal prices. The Company may use derivative strategies to limit the downside risk associated with fluctuating byproduct metal prices and enters into forward contracts to lock in exchange rates based on projected Canadian dollar, Euro and Mexican peso operating and capital needs. Please see "Item 11 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Risk Profile – Metal Price and Foreign Currency" and "Item 11  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Risk"Risk Profile – Financial Instruments". Please see "– Results of Operations – Production Costs" above for a discussion aboutdisclosure regarding the use of the non-US GAAP financial measure total cash costs per ounce.ounce of gold produced.

108            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Exploration and Corporate Development Expense

In 2011,2013, Agnico-Eagle expects to incur expenditures of $105$92.0 million on grassrootsminesite and advanced project exploration, greenfield exploration and corporate development, comprised mostly of grassrootsdevelopment. Approximately $21.0 million is expected to be spent on greenfield exploration outside of the Company's currently contemplated mining areas in Canada, Latin America, Finland and the United States. Exploration is success driven and thus these estimates could change materially based on the success of the various exploration programs. In addition, whenWhen it is determined that a mining property can be economically developed as a result of established proven and probable reserves, the costs of explorationdrilling and development to further delineate the ore body on such a property are capitalized. In 2011,2013, the Company expects to capitalize $40$38.0 million on explorationdrilling and development related to further delineating ore bodies and converting resources into reserves.

Other Expenses

Cash general and administrative expenses are not expected to increase materiallysignificantly in 2011; however2013. However, non-cash variances from budget may occur as a result of variances in the Black-Scholes pricing of any stock options granted by the Company in 2011. In 2011, provincial2013. Provincial capital taxes aretax expense is expected to be nil sincein 2013 due to the elimination of the Ontario provincial capital tax was eliminated on July 1, 2010 and the elimination of the Quebec capital tax was eliminated at the end of 2010. Amortization of property, plant and mine development is expected to beincrease to approximately $227$293.1 million mainly due to the first full year of amortization of the Meadowbank Mine.in 2013 compared with $271.9 million in 2012. Interest expense in 2011 is expected to bedecrease to approximately $49$55.1 million in 2013 compared with $57.9 million in 2012 due primarily to decreased amounts drawn under the long-term debt and standby fees associated withCredit Facility, offset partially by amounts owing on the $1.2 billion credit facility.2012 Notes. The Company's effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 30% to 35%34.6% in 20112013 compared towith an effective rate of 23.7%28.5% in 2010.2012. The lower2012 effective tax rate in 2010 was due toresulted from the factors mentioneddetailed in "– Results of Operations – Income and Mining Taxes" above.

Capital Expenditures

Agnico-Eagle's gold growth program remains well funded. Capital expenditures, including construction and development costs, sustaining capital and capitalized exploration costs, are expected to total approximately $313$596.0 million in 2011. During 2011,2013. In 2013, the Company expects to generate internal cash flow from the sale of 1.13 – 1.23 million ounces ofits gold production and the associated byproduct metals. The breakdownSignificant components of the 2011expected 2013 capital expenditures program is as follows:include the following:

96            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The Company continues to examine other possible corporate development opportunities which may result in the acquisition of companies, or assets with securities, cash or a combination thereof. If cash is used depending on the size of the acquisition,to fund acquisitions, Agnico-Eagle may be required to borrow moneyissue debt or issue securities to fund suchsatisfy cash requirements.

Outstanding Securities

The following table sets outdetails the maximum number of common shares that would be outstanding if all dilutive instruments outstanding at March 18, 201112, 2013 were exercised:





Common shares outstanding at March 18, 201112, 2013 168,944,915172,501,169 

Employee stock options 9,082,77011,750,991 

Warrants 8,600,000 

  186,627,685192,852,160 

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            109

Table of Contents


Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The Company evaluates the estimates periodically, including those relating to trade receivables, inventories, futuredeferred tax assets and liabilities, mining properties, goodwill and asset retirement obligations. In making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the Company uses estimates based on historical experience and various assumptions that are considered reasonable in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies relate to its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its audited consolidated financial statements. Management has discussed the development and selection of the following critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board and the Audit Committeewhich has reviewed the Company's disclosure in this Form 20-F.

Mining Properties, Plant and Equipment and Mine Development Costs

Significant payments related to the acquisition of land and mineral rights are capitalized as mining properties at cost. If a mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized to income when production begins, using the unit-of-production method, based on estimated proven and probable reserves. If no mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined the property has no future economic value.

Expenditures for new facilities and improvements that can extend the useful lives of existing facilities are capitalized as plant and equipment at cost. Interest costs incurred for the construction of projects are capitalized.

Mine development costs incurred after the commencement of production are capitalized or deferred to the extent that these costs benefit the mining of the entire ore body. Costs incurred to access single ore blocks are expensed as incurred; otherwise, such vertical and horizontal development is classified as mine development costs.

Agnico-Eagle records depreciationamortization on both plant and equipment and mine development costs used in commercial production on a unit-of-production basis based on the estimated tonnage of proven and probable mineral reserves of the mine. The unit-of-production method defines the denominator as the total proven and probable tonnes of reserves.

Repairs and maintenance expenditures are charged to income as production costs. Assets under construction are not depreciated until the end of the construction period. Upon achievingachievement of commercial production, the capitalized construction costs are transferred to the various categoriesappropriate category of plant and equipment.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            97

Table of Contents


Mineral exploration costs are charged to income in the year in which they are incurred. When it is determined that a mining property can be economically developed as a result of established proven and probable reserves, the costs of further explorationdrilling and development to further delineate the ore body on such property are capitalized. The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of final feasibility studies, whichthat indicate whether a property is economically feasible. Upon commencement of the commercial production of a development project, these costs are transferred to the appropriate asset category and are amortized to income using the unit-of-production method mentioneddescribed above. Mine development costs, net of salvage values, relating to a property that is abandoned or considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future are written off.

The carrying values of mining properties, plant and equipment and mine development costs are periodically reviewed for possible impairment, when impairment factors exist, based on the future undiscounted net cash flows of the operating mine or development property. If it is determined that the estimated net recoverable amount is less than the carrying value, then a write down to the estimated fair value amount is made with a charge to income. Estimated future cash flows of an operating mine and development properties include estimates of recoverable ounces of gold based on the proven and probable mineral reserves. To the extent that economic value exists beyond the proven and probable mineral reserves of an operating mine or development property, this value is included as part of the estimated future cash flows. Estimated future cash flows also involve estimates regarding metal prices (considering current and historical prices, price trends and related factors), production levels, capital and reclamation costs, and related income and mining taxes, all based on detailed engineering life-of-mine plans. Cash flows are subject to risks and uncertainties and changes in the estimates of the cash flows may affect the recoverability of long-lived assets.

110            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Goodwill

Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method whereby assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values as of the date of acquisition and any excess of the purchase price over such fair values is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized.

The Company performs goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis as well as when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may no longer be recoverable. In performing the impairment tests, the Company estimates the fair values of its reporting units that include goodwill and compares those fair values to the reporting units' carrying amounts. If a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the Company compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill to the carrying amount, and any excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over the implied fair value is charged to income.

At December 31, 2012, the Company concluded that it did not have any reporting units that were at risk of failing the Step 1 goodwill impairment test under ASC 350 – Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when the following conditions are met:

Revenue from gold and silver in the form of dorédore bars is recorded when the refined gold and silver is sold and delivered to the customer. Generally, all the gold and silver in the form of dorédore bars recovered in the Company's milling process is sold in the period in which it is produced.

Under the terms of the Company's concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, final prices for the gold, silver, zinc, copper and leadmetals contained in the concentrate are setdetermined based on the prevailing spot market metal prices on a specified future date, which is based on the date that the concentrate is delivered to the smelter. Agnico-EagleThe Company records revenues under these contracts based on forward prices at the time of delivery, which is when transfer of legal title to concentrate passes to the third-party smelters. The terms of the contracts result in differences between the recorded estimated price at delivery and the final settlement price. These differences are adjusted through revenue at each subsequent financial statement date.

Revenues from mining operations consist of gold revenues, net of smelting, refining, transportation and other marketing charges. Revenues from byproduct metals sales are shown net of smelter charges as part of revenues from mining operations.

Reclamation Costs

On an annual basis, the Company assesses cost estimates and other assumptions used in the valuation of Asset Retirement Obligationsasset retirement obligations ("ARO"AROs") at each of its mineral properties to reflect events, changes in circumstances and new information available. Changes in these cost estimates and assumptions have a corresponding impact on the fair value of the ARO which has a material balance.AROs. For closed mines, any change in the fair value of AROs results in a corresponding charge or credit within other expenses,expense, whereas at operating mines the charge is recorded as an adjustment to the carrying amount of the corresponding asset. The Company did record some adjustments for changes in estimates of the AROs at our operating mines in 2010.

AROs arise from the acquisition, development, construction and operation of mining property,properties and plant and equipment due to government controls and regulations that protect the environment on the closure and reclamation of mining properties. The major parts of the carrying amount of AROs relate toto: tailings and heap leach pad closure/closure and rehabilitation; demolition of buildings/buildings and mine facilities; ongoing water treatment; and ongoing care and maintenance of closed mines. The fair values of AROs are measured by discounting the expected cash flows using a discount factor that reflects the credit-adjusted risk-free rate of interest. The Company prepares estimates of the timing

98            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



and amount of expected cash flows when an ARO is incurred. Expected cash flows are updated to reflect changes in facts and circumstances. The principal factors that can cause expected cash flows to change are: the construction of new processing facilities; changes in the quantities of material in reserves and a corresponding change in the life of mine plan; changing ore characteristics that impact required environmental protection measures and related costs; changes in water quality that impact the extent of water treatment required; and changes in laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. When expected cash flows increase, the revised cash flows are discounted using a current discount

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            111

Table of Contents



factor, whereas when expected cash flows decrease, the reduced cash flows are discounted using the historical discount factor used in the original estimation of the expected cash flows, inflows. In either case, any change in the fair value of the ARO is recorded. Agnico-Eagle records the fair value of an ARO when it is incurred. AROs are adjusted to reflect the passage of time (accretion), which is calculated by applying the discount factor implicit in the initial fair value measurement to the beginning-of-period carrying amount of the AROs. For producing mines, accretion expense is recorded in the cost of goods sold each period. Upon settlement of an ARO, Agnico-Eagle records a gain or loss if the actual cost differs from the carrying amount of the ARO. Settlement gains/losses are recorded in income.

Environmental remediation liabilities ("ERLs") are differentiated from AROs in that they do not arise from environmental contamination in the normal operation of a long-lived asset or from a legal obligation to treat environmental contamination resulting from the acquisition, construction or development of a long-lived asset.

The Company is required to recognize a liability for obligations associated with ERLs arising from past acts. ERL fair value is measured by discounting the expected related cash flows using a discount factor that reflects the credit-adjusted risk-free rate of interest. The Company prepares estimates of the timing and amount of expected cash flows when an ERL is incurred. On an annual basis, the Company assesses cost estimates and other (income) expense. assumptions used in the valuation of ERLs to reflect events, changes in circumstances and new information available. Changes in these cost estimates and assumptions have a corresponding impact on the fair value of the ERL. Any change in the fair value of ERLs results in a corresponding charge or credit to income. Upon settlement of an ERL, Agnico-Eagle records a gain or loss if the actual cost differs from the carrying amount of the ARO. Settlement gains/losses are recorded in income.

Other environmental remediation costs that are not AROs or environmental remediation liabilities as defined by ASC 410410-20 – Asset Retirement Obligationsand 410-30 – Environmental Obligations (Prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations), respectively, are expensed as incurred.

Future Tax AssetsIncome and LiabilitiesMining Taxes

Agnico-Eagle follows the liability method of tax allocation for accounting for income taxes. Under this method of tax allocation, futuredeferred income and mining tax bases of assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company's operations involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, provincial, state and international tax audits. The Company recognizes the effect of uncertain tax positions and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in Canada and other tax jurisdictions where it is more likely than not based on technical merits that the position would not be sustained. The Company recognizes the amount of any tax benefits that have greater than 50 percent likelihood of being ultimately realized upon settlement.

Changes in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions are recognized in the year of such change. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense in the current year. The Company adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances; however, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the Company's current estimate of the tax liabilities. If the Company's estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, an additional charge to expense would result. If the estimate of tax liabilities proves to be greater than the ultimate assessment, a tax benefit would result.

On December 12, 2008, the Company executed a Canadian federal tax election to commence using the US dollar as its functional currency for federal Canadian income tax purposes. As the related tax legislation was enacted in the first quarter of 2009, this election applies to taxation years ended December 31, 2008 and subsequent. This election resulted in a deferred tax benefit of $21.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company executed the newly enacted Quebec foreign currency election to commence using the U.S. dollar as its functional currency for Quebec income tax purposes. As the related tax legislation was enacted in the second quarter of 2010, this election applies to taxation years ended on or after December 31, 2008 and subsequent.2008. This election resulted in a deferred tax benefit of $21.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Financial Instruments

Agnico-Eagle uses derivative financial instruments, primarily option and forward contracts, to manage exposure to fluctuations of basebyproduct metal prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates and may use such means to manage exposure to certain input costs as well.costs. Agnico-Eagle does not hold financial instruments or derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments

112            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



are either recognized periodically in the consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) or in shareholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),loss, depending on the nature of the derivative financial instrument and whether it qualifies for

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            99

Table of Contents



hedge accounting. Financial instruments designated as hedges are tested for effectiveness on a quarterly basis. Gains and losses on those contracts that are proven to be effective are reported as a component of the related transaction.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company's Employee Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan") provides for the granting of options to directors, officers, employees and service providers to purchase common shares. Options have exercise prices equal to market price on the day prior to the date of grant. The fair value of these options is recognized in the consolidated statementstatements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) or in the consolidated balance sheetsheets if capitalized as part of property, plant and mine development over the applicable vesting period as a compensation cost. Any consideration paid by employees on exercise of options or purchase of common shares is credited to share capital.

Fair value is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model which requires the Company to estimate the expected volatility of the Company's share price and the expected life of the stock options. Limitations with existing option valuation models and the inherent difficulties associated with estimating these variables create difficulties in determining a reliable single measure of the fair value of stock option grants. The dilutive impact of stock option grants is factored into the Company's reported diluted net income (loss) per share.

Commercial Production

The Company assesses each mine construction project to determine when a mine moves into the production stage. The criteria used to assess the start date are determined based on the nature of each mine construction project, such as the complexity of a plant and its location. The Company considers various relevant criteria to assess when the mine is substantially complete and ready for its intended use and moved into the production stage. The criteria considered include: (1) the completion of a reasonable period of testing of mine plant and equipment; (2) the ability to produce minerals in saleable form (within specifications); and (3) the ability to sustain ongoing production of minerals. When a mine construction project moves into the production stage, the capitalization of certain mine construction costs ceases and costs are either capitalized to inventoryinventories or expensed, except for sustaining capital costs related to property,mining properties, plant and equipment and undergroundor mine development or reserve development.

Stripping Costs

Pre-production stripping costs are capitalized until an "other thande minimis"minimis" level of mineral is produced, after which time such costs are either capitalized to inventory or expensed. The Company considers various relevant criteria to assess when an "other thande minimis"minimis" level of mineral is produced. The criteria considered include: (1) the number of ounces mined compared to total ounces in mineral reserves; (2) the quantity of ore mined compared to the total quantity of ore expected to be mined over the life of the mine; (3) the current stripping ratio compared to the expected stripping ratio over the life of the mine; and (4) the ore grade compared to the expected ore grade over the life of the mine. Please refer to notes (ii)(iii) and (iii)(iv) of the "Reconciliation of Production Costs to Total Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold to Production CostsProduced by Mine" section above for a discussion of stripping costs with regards to "cash costs".

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements and Developments

Under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 74, the Company is required to disclose information related to new accounting standards that have not yet been adopted. Agnico-Eagle is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of these statements will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Disclosure about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities

In November 2011, ASC guidance was issued relating to disclosure on offsetting financial instrument and derivative financial instrument assets and liabilities. Under the updated guidance, entities are required to disclose gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheets and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The update is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning January 1, 2013. Agnico-Eagle is evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            113

100Table of Contents


Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers

In August 2012, the SEC adopted new rules requiring resource extraction issuers to include in an annual report information relating to any payment, whether a single payment or a series of related payments, that equals or exceeds $100,000 during the most recent fiscal year, made by the issuer, a subsidiary of the issuer or an entity under the control of the issuer, to the United States federal government or a foreign government for the purpose of the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals. Resource extraction issuers will be required to provide information about the type and total amount of such payments made for each project related to the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals, and the type and total amount of payments made to each government. A resource extraction issuer must comply with the new rules and form for fiscal years ending after September 30, 2013, but may provide a partial year report if the issuer's fiscal year began before September 30, 2013. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of complying with these new rules in its 2013 annual disclosure.

Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

In February 2013, ASC guidance was issued relating to the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Under the updated guidance, entities are required to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and by consolidated statement of income (loss) line item, as required under US GAAP. The update is effective for the Company's fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2013. Agnico-Eagle is evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

International Financial Reporting Standards

Based on recent guidance from the Canadian Securities Administrators and the SEC, as a Canadian issuer and existing US GAAP filer, the Company will continue to be permitted to use US GAAP as its principal basis of accounting. The SEC has not yet committed to a timeline which would require the Company to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). A decision to voluntarily adopt IFRS has not been made by the Company.

114            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY DATA

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

   March 31,
2009
  June 30,
2009
  September 30,
2009
  December 31,
2009
  Total
2009
  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Income contribution analysis                 

LaRonde Mine $37,647 $50,652 $40,276 $59,425 $188,000  

Goldex Mine $18,466 $19,107 $16,687 $33,891  88,151  

Kittila Mine   $3,145 $884 $14,964  18,993  

Lapa Mine   $(833)$2,751 $8,019  9,937  

Pinos Altos Mine        2,363  2,363  

Operating margin  56,113  72,071  60,598  118,662  307,444  

Amortization  12,130  15,470  23,200  21,661  72,461  

Corporate expenses  14,647  38,016  44,007  30,275  126,945  

Income (loss) before tax  29,336  18,585  (6,609) 66,726  108,038  

Tax provision (recovery)  (25,005) 17,358  10,357  18,790  21,500  

Net income (loss) for the period $54,341 $1,227 $(16,966)$47,936 $86,538  

Net income (loss) per share – basic $0.35 $0.01 $(0.11)$0.31 $0.55  

Net income (loss) per share – diluted $0.35 $0.01 $(0.11)$0.30 $0.55  

Cash flows                 

Operating cash flow $48,823 $26,369 $(13,787)$53,701 $115,106  

Investing cash flow $(155,422)$(155,730)$(136,756)$(139,703)$(587,611) 

Financing cash flow $216,447 $88,247 $217,590 $37,534 $559,818  

Realized prices                 

Gold (per ounce) $969 $962 $939 $1,153 $1,024  

Silver (per ounce) $13.53 $14.32 $15.59 $19.17 $15.54  

Zinc (per tonne) $1,213 $1,698 $1,932 $2,506 $1,808  

Copper (per tonne) $4,110 $5,832 $7,580 $7,469 $6,140  

Payable production:(1)                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde Mine  51,339  58,034  47,726  46,395  203,494  

 Goldex Mine  35,959  35,645  31,169  46,076  148,849  

 Kittila Mine  4,514  13,771  18,284  35,269  71,838  

 Lapa Mine    11,603  18,409  22,590  52,602  

 Pinos Altos Mine      3,175  13,014  16,189  

   91,812  119,053  118,763  163,344  492,972  

   Three Months Ended     
  
     
   March 31,
2012
  June 30,
2012
  September 30,
2012
  December 31,
2012
  Total
2012
  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)
Operating margin                 

Revenues from mining operations $472,934 $459,561 $535,836 $449,383 $1,917,714  

Production costs  215,035  219,906  220,408  242,363  897,712  

Operating margin  257,899  239,655  315,428  207,020  1,020,002  

Operating margin by mine                 

LaRonde mine  63,266  29,342  45,625  35,363  173,596  

Lapa mine  27,677  26,222  25,723  20,755  100,377  

Kittila mine  49,049  31,489  52,655  53,199  186,392  

Pinos Altos mine(i)  69,135  79,887  87,167  61,533  297,722  

Meadowbank mine  48,772  72,715  104,258  36,170  261,915  

Operating margin  257,899  239,655  315,428  207,020  1,020,002  

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  64,553  66,310  68,318  72,680  271,861  

Corporate and other  85,836  96,169  94,763  36,232  313,000  

Income before income and mining taxes  107,510  77,176  152,347  98,108  435,141  

Income and mining taxes  28,962  33,904  46,021  15,338  124,225  

Net income for the period $78,548 $43,272 $106,326 $82,770 $310,916  

Net income per share – basic $0.46 $0.25 $0.62 $0.48 $1.82  

Net income per share – diluted $0.46 $0.25 $0.62 $0.48 $1.81  

Cash flows                 

Cash provided by operating activities $196,497 $194,082 $199,464 $f105,964 $696,007  

Cash used in investing activities $(88,908)$(68,619)$(121,837)$(96,792)$(376,156) 

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities $(132,078)$(29,258)$(55,406)$14,136 $(202,606) 

Realized prices                 

Gold (per ounce) $1,684 $1,602 $1,695 $1,684 $1,667  

Silver (per ounce) $34 $26 $34 $31 $32  

Zinc (per tonne) $2,125 $1,901 $1,836 $1,906 $1,955  

Copper (per tonne) $9,006 $6,455 $9,046 $7,668 $8,083  

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            101115

Table of Contents


Silver (ounces in thousands)                 

 LaRonde Mine  1,029  1,034  995  861  3,919  

 Pinos Altos Mine      16  100  116  

   1,029  1,034  1,011  961  4,035  

Zinc (LaRonde Mine) (tonnes)  13,291  14,928  12,516  15,451  56,186  

Copper (LaRonde Mine) (tonnes)  1,682  2,066  1,400  1,523  6,671  

Payable metal sold:                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde Mine  53,516  59,608  48,959  42,751  204,834  

 Goldex Mine  30,901  33,501  32,572  48,241  145,215  

 Kittila Mine    6,780  21,946  30,635  59,361  

 Lapa Mine    3,167  14,669  23,885  41,721  

 Pinos Altos Mine      594  11,935  12,529  

   84,417  103,056  118,740  157,447  463,660  

Payable production:(ii)                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  43,281  40,206  40,477  36,911  160,875  

 Lapa mine  28,499  28,157  24,914  24,621  106,191  

 Kittila mine  46,758  35,228  48,619  45,273  175,878  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  57,016  63,356  61,973  52,492  234,837  

 Meadowbank mine  79,401  98,403  110,988  77,238  366,030  

   254,955  265,350  286,971  236,535  1,043,811  

Silver (thousands of ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  690  532  475  547  2,244  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  507  537  639  628  2,311  

 Meadowbank mine  18  26  26  21  91  

   1,215  1,095  1,140  1,196  4,646  

Zinc (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  12,978  9,558  7,379  8,722  38,637  

Copper (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  1,326  1,004  982  814  4,126  

Payable metal sold:                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  43,745  39,886  37,466  37,726  158,823  

 Lapa mine  27,897  27,793  24,772  24,309  104,771  

 Kittila mine  44,227  34,476  45,155  46,620  170,478  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  52,145  66,373  61,265  50,201  229,984  

 Meadowbank mine  74,614  93,299  116,341  79,752  364,006  

   242,628  261,827  284,999  238,608  1,028,062  

Silver (thousands of ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  718  482  467  566  2,233  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  493  525  635  583  2,236  

 Meadowbank mine  18  24  26  19  87  

   1,229  1,031  1,128  1,168  4,556  

Zinc (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  13,032  10,379  10,120  9,073  42,604  

Copper (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  1,293  1,085  937  800  4,115  

Notes:

(1)(i)
Includes Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos.

(ii)
Payable mineral production meansis the quantity of mineral produced during a period contained in products that are or will be sold by the Company, whether such products are sold during the period or held as inventory at the end of the period.

102116            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

   March 31,
2010
  June 30,
2010
  September 30,
2010
  December 31,
2010
  Total
2010
  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Income contribution analysis                 

LaRonde Mine $45,387 $43,614 $48,722 $65,517 $203,240  

Goldex Mine  26,423  42,635  44,349  50,122  163,529  

Kittila Mine  11,470  16,625  26,838  17,467  72,400  

Lapa Mine  21,273  20,204  17,764  25,477  84,718  

Pinos Altos Mine  12,631  22,626  15,089  34,998  85,344  

Meadowbank Mine  2,171  35,179  49,042  49,426  135,818  

Operating margin  119,355  180,883  201,804  243,007  745,049  

Amortization  30,503  44,003  48,145  69,835  192,486  

Corporate expenses  47,578  28,331  (9,818) 51,269  117,360  

Income before tax  41,274  108,549  163,477  121,903  435,203  

Tax provision  18,942  8,189  42,016  33,940  103,087  

Net income for the period $22,332 $100,360 $121,461 $87,963 $332,116  

Net income per share – basic $0.14 $0.64 $0.73 $0.53 $2.05  

Net income per share – diluted $0.14 $0.63 $0.71 $0.51 $2.00  

Cash flows                 

Operating cash flow $74,491 $161,574 $156,829 $90,576 $483,470  

Investing cash flow $(119,329)$(116,826)$(163,798)$(123,353)$(523,306) 

Financing cash flow $(1,646)$(10,422)$531 $(10,408)$(21,945) 

Realized prices                 

Gold (per ounce) $1,111 $1,222 $1,235 $1,387 $1,250  

Silver (per ounce) $17.87 $19.29 $20.53 $31.96 $22.56  

Zinc (per tonne) $2,235 $1,890 $2,151 $2,391 $2,165  

Copper (per tonne) $7,288 $6,581 $8,689 $10,311 $8,182  

Payable production:(1)                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde Mine  45,036  41,533  37,832  38,405  162,806  

 Goldex Mine  42,269  48,334  50,672  43,111  184,386  

 Kittila Mine  24,547  31,593  40,344  29,721  126,205  

 Lapa Mine  31,553  28,927  27,687  29,289  117,456  

 Pinos Altos Mine  26,228  29,665  35,248  39,289  130,431  

 Creston Mascota Mine        666  666  

   Three Months Ended     
  
     
   March 31,
2011
  June 30,
2011
  September 30,
2011
  December 31,
2011
  Total
2011
  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)
Operating margin                 

Revenues from mining operations $412,068 $433,691 $520,537 $455,503 $1,821,799  

Production costs  198,567  212,754  237,190  227,567  876,078  

Operating margin  213,501  220,937  283,347  227,936  945,721  

Operating margin by mine                 

LaRonde mine  48,983  46,017  59,081  34,581  188,662  

Goldex mine  40,333  46,739  48,974  24,677  160,723  

Lapa mine  19,178  27,737  28,286  23,736  98,937  

Kittila mine  27,831  18,934  34,751  33,619  115,135  

Pinos Altos mine(i)  47,259  52,568  65,777  67,111  232,715  

Meadowbank mine  29,917  28,942  46,478  44,212  149,549  

Operating margin  213,501  220,937  283,347  227,936  945,721  

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  61,929  59,235  67,104  73,513  261,781  

Impairment Loss on Meadowbank mine        907,681  907,681  

Loss on Goldex mine      298,183  4,710  302,893  

Corporate and other  74,210  56,936  28,644  92,204  251,994  

Income (loss) before income and mining taxes  77,362  104,766  (110,584) (850,172) (778,628) 

Income and mining taxes  32,098  35,941  (28,970) (248,742) (209,673) 

Net income (loss) for the period $45,264 $68,825 $(81,614)$(601,430)$(568,955) 

Attributed to non-controlling interest $ $ $ $(60)$(60) 

Attributed to common shareholders $45,264 $68,825 $(81,614)$(601,370)$(568,895) 

Net income (loss) per share – basic $0.27 $0.41 $(0.48)$(3.53)$(3.36) 

Net income (loss) per share – diluted $0.26 $0.40 $(0.48)$(3.53)$(3.36) 

Cash flows                 

Cash provided by operating activities $174,766 $162,821 $197,570 $132,028 $667,185  

Cash used in investing activities $(89,956)$(116,173)$(247,772)$(306,583)$(760,484) 

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities $(72,565)$(22,180)$29,106 $244,461 $178,822  

Realized prices                 

Gold (per ounce) $1,400 $1,530 $1,717 $1,640 $1,573  

Silver (per ounce) $36 $39 $37 $27 $34  

Zinc (per tonne) $2,509 $2,257 $2,166 $2,188 $1,892  

Copper (per tonne) $10,027 $8,565 $8,561 $8,510 $7,162  

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            103117

Table of Contents


 Meadowbank Mine  18,599  77,676  93,395  75,990  265,659  

   188,232  257,728  285,178  256,471  987,609  

Silver (ounces in thousands)                 

 LaRonde Mine  875  860  1,080  766  3,581  

 Pinos Altos Mine  222  248  290  427  1,185  

 Creston Mascota Mine        493  493  

 Meadowbank Mine  2  12  18  14  46  

   1,099  1,120  1,388  1,698  5,305  

Zinc (LaRonde Mine) (tonnes)  14,224  18,465  14,915  14,939  62,544  

Copper (LaRonde Mine) (tonnes)  1,052  1,056  1,181  935  4,224  

Payable metal sold:                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde Mine  45,240  41,666  36,979  39,896  163,781  

 Goldex Mine  37,863  48,310  49,117  48,067  183,357  

 Kittila Mine  30,674  28,588  41,655  28,722  129,639  

 Lapa Mine  34,193  31,920  25,846  31,177  123,136  

 Pinos Altos Mine  20,965  30,634  31,759  39,156  122,514  

 Meadowbank Mine  7,103  70,182  93,495  79,849  250,629  

   176,038  251,300  278,851  266,867  973,056  

Payable production:(ii)                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  36,893  27,525  29,069  30,686  124,173  

 Goldex mine  38,500  41,998  40,224  14,756  135,478  

 Lapa mine  26,914  28,552  27,881  23,721  107,068  

 Kittila mine  40,317  30,811  37,924  34,508  143,560  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  48,001  51,066  52,739  52,574  204,380  

 Meadowbank mine  61,737  59,376  78,141  71,547  270,801  

   252,362  239,328  265,978  227,792  985,460  

Silver (thousands of ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  680  736  968  785  3,169  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  406  452  485  508  1,851  

 Meadowbank mine  13  13  16  18  60  

   1,099  1,201  1,469  1,311  5,080  

Zinc (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  11,941  14,678  15,684  12,591  54,894  

Copper (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  817  666  731  1,002  3,216  

Payable metal sold:                 

Gold (ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  37,459  28,589  26,729  31,342  124,119  

 Goldex mine  41,895  41,564  37,380  20,863  141,702  

 Lapa mine  25,776  29,749  27,955  23,854  107,334  

 Kittila mine  40,698  29,794  36,745  37,769  145,006  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  45,484  48,847  54,297  55,611  204,239  

 Meadowbank mine  61,928  58,767  74,416  78,579  273,690  

   253,240  237,310  257,522  248,018  996,090  

Silver (thousands of ounces)                 

 LaRonde mine  679  726  901  865  3,171  

 Pinos Altos mine(i)  409  428  475  546  1,858  

 Meadowbank mine  21  14  7  18  60  

   1,109  1,168  1,383  1,429  5,089  

Zinc (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  8,302  16,649  18,032  11,516  54,499  

Copper (LaRonde mine) (tonnes)  820  658  738  978  3,194  

Notes:

(1)(i)
Includes Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos.

(ii)
Payable mineral production meansis the quantity of mineral produced during a period contained in products that are or will be sold by the Company, whether such products are sold during the period or held as inventory at the end of the period.

104118            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL AND OPERATING SUMMARY

FINANCIAL DATA

   2010  2009  2008  2007  2006  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Revenues from mining operations $1,422,521 $613,762 $368,938 $432,205 $464,632  

Interest, sundry income and gain on available-for-sale securities  94,879  26,314  (37,465) 29,230  45,915  

   1,517,400  640,076  331,473  461,435  510,547  

Costs and expenses  1,082,197  532,038  235,482  302,157  249,904  

Income before income taxes  435,203  108,038  95,991  159,278  260,643  

Income and mining taxes expense (recovery)  103,087  21,500  22,824  19,933  99,306  

Net income $332,116 $86,538 $73,167 $139,345 $161,337  

Net income per share – basic $2.05 $0.55 $0.51 $1.05 $1.40  

Net income per share – diluted $2.00 $0.55 $0.50 $1.04 $1.35  

Operating cash flow $483,470 $115,106 $121,175 $246,329 $227,015  

Investing cash flow $(523,306)$(587,611)$(917,549)$(373,099)$(299,723) 

Financing cash flow $(21,945)$559,818 $558,072 $126,508 $297,816  

Dividends declared per share $0.64 $0.18 $0.18 $0.18 $0.12  

Capital expenditures $511,641 $657,175 $908,853 $523,793 $149,185  

Average gold price per ounce realized $1,250 $1,024 $879 $748 $622  

Average exchange rate – C$ per $ C$1.0301 C$1.1415 C$1.0669 C$1.0738 C$1.1344  

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands)  162,343  155,942  144,741  132,768  115,461  

Working capital (including undrawn credit lines) $1,491,471 $598,581 $508,335 $751,587 $839,898  

Total assets $5,500,351 $4,427,357 $3,378,824 $2,735,498 $1,521,488  

Long-term debt $650,000 $715,000 $200,000 $ $  

Shareholders' equity $3,665,450 $2,751,761 $2,517,756 $2,058,934 $1,252,405  

Operating Summary                 

LaRonde Mine                 

Revenues from mining operations $392,386 $352,221 $330,652 $432,205 $464,632  

Production costs  189,146  164,221  166,496  166,104  143,753  

Gross profit (exclusive of amortization shown below) $203,240 $188,000 $164,156 $266,101 $320,879  

Amortization  30,404  28,392  28,285  27,757  25,255  

Gross profit $172,836 $159,608 $135,871 $238,344 $295,624  

   Years Ended December 31,
  
   2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)
Revenues from mining operations   $1,917,714   $1,821,799   $1,422,521   $613,762   $368,938  

Interest and sundry (expense) income and other  (6,207) (5,167) 94,879  26,314  (37,465) 

   1,911,507  1,816,632  1,517,400  640,076  331,473  

Other costs and expenses  1,476,366  2,595,260  1,082,197  532,038  235,482  

Income (loss) before income and mining taxes  435,141  (778,628) 435,203  108,038  95,991  

Income and mining taxes  124,225  (209,673) 103,087  21,500  22,824  

Net income (loss) for the year   $310,916   $(568,955)  $332,116   $86,538   $73,167  

Attributed to non-controlling interest   $   $(60)  $   $   $  

Attributed to common shareholders   $310,916   $(568,895)  $332,116   $86,538   $73,167  

Net income (loss) per share – basic   $1.82   $(3.36)  $2.05   $0.55   $0.51  

Net income (loss) per share – diluted   $1.81   $(3.36)  $2.00   $0.55   $0.50  

Cash provided by operating activities   $696,007   $667,185   $487,507   $118,139   $121,175  

Cash used in investing activities   $376,156   $(760,484)  $(523,306)  $(587,611)  $(917,549) 

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities   $(202,606)  $178,822   $(25,982)  $556,785   $558,072  

Cash dividends declared per common share   $1.02   $   $0.64   $0.18   $0.18  

Capital expenditures   $445,550   $482,831   $511,641   $657,175   $908,853  

Average gold price realized ($ per ounce)   $1,667   $1,573   $1,250   $1,024   $879  

Average exchange rate (C$ per $) C$0.9994 C$0.9893 C$1.0301 C$1.1415 C$1.0669  

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic (thousands)  171,250  169,353  162,343  155,942  144,741  

Working capital and Credit Facility drawdown availability   $1,795,495   $1,472,300   $1,491,471   $598,581   $508,335  

Total assets   $5,255,842   $5,034,262   $5,500,351   $4,247,357   $3,378,824  

Long-term debt   $830,000   $920,095   $650,000   $715,000   $200,000  

Shareholders' equity   $3,410,212   $3,215,163   $3,665,450   $2,751,761   $2,517,756  

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            105119

Table of Contents


Tonnes of ore milled  2,592,252  2,545,831  2,638,691  2,673,463  2,673,080  

Gold – grams per tonne  2.17  2.75  2.84  2.95  3.13  

Gold production – ounces  162,806  203,494  216,208  230,992  245,826  

Silver production – ounces (in thousands)  3,581  3,919  4,079  4,920  4,956  

Zinc production – tonnes  62,544  56,186  65,755  71,577  82,183  

Copper production – tonnes  4,224  6,671  6,922  7,482  7,289  

Total cash costs (per ounce):                 

Production costs $1,162 $807 $770 $719 $585  

Less: Net byproduct revenues  (1,180) (699) (658) (1,082) (1,240) 

 Inventory adjustments  19  1    4  (31) 

 Accretion expense and other  (8) (6) (6) (6) (4) 

Total cash costs (per ounce)(1) $(7)$103 $106 $(365)$(690) 

Minesite costs per tonne(1) C$75 C$72 C$67 C$66 C$62  

Operating Summary                 

LaRonde mine                 

Revenues from mining operations   $399,243   $398,609   $392,386   $352,221   $330,652  

Production costs  225,647  209,947  189,146  164,221  166,496  

Operating margin  173,596  188,662  203,240  188,000  164,156  

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  47,912  31,089  30,404  28,392  28,285  

Gross profit   $125,684   $157,573   $172,836   $159,608   $135,871  

Tonnes of ore milled  2,358,499  2,406,342  2,592,252  2,545,831  2,638,691  

Gold (grams per tonne)  2.36  1.79  2.17  2.75  2.84  

Gold production (ounces)  160,875  124,173  162,806  203,494  216,208  

Silver production (thousands of ounces)  2,244  3,169  3,581  3,919  4,079  

Zinc production (tonnes)  38,637  54,894  62,544  56,186  65,755  

Copper production (tonnes)  4,126  3,216  4,224  6,671  6,922  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce basis):                 

 Production costs   $1,403   $1,691   $1,162   $807   $770  

 Adjustments:                 

  Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (819) (1,562) (1,180) (699) (658) 

  Inventory and other adjustments(i)  1  (19) 19  1    

  Non-cash reclamation provision  (16) (33) (8) (6) (6) 

 Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced(ii)   $569   $77   $(7)  $103   $106  

Minesite costs per tonne(ii) C$95 C$84 C$75 C$72 C$67  

120            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


   Years Ended December 31,
  
   2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  
  
Goldex mine                 

Revenues from mining operations   $   $217,662   $225,090   $142,493   $38,286  

Production costs    56,939  61,561  54,342  20,366  

Operating margin    160,723  163,529  88,151  17,920  

Amortization of property, plant and mine development    16,910  21,428  21,716  7,250  

Gross profit   $   $143,813   $142,101   $66,435   $10,670  

Tonnes of ore milled    2,476,515  2,781,564  2,614,645  1,118,543  

Gold (grams per tonne)    1.79  2.21  1.98  1.86  

Gold production (ounces)    135,478  184,386  148,849  57,436  

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce basis):                 

 Production costs   $   $420   $333   $365   $430  

 Adjustments:                 

  Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges    3  4        

  Inventory and other adjustments(i)    (21) (1) 3  (9) 

  Non-cash reclamation provision    (1) (1) (1) (2) 

 Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced(ii)   $   $401   $335   $367   $419  

Minesite costs per tonne(ii) C$ C$21 C$22 C$23 C$27  

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            121

Table of Contents


Lapa mine                 

Revenues from mining operations   $173,753   $167,536   $150,917   $43,409   $  

Production costs  73,376  68,599  66,199  33,472    

Operating margin  100,377  98,937  84,718  9,937    

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  42,216  37,954  31,986  9,906    

Gross profit   $58,161   $60,983   $52,732   $31   $  

Tonnes of ore milled  640,306  620,712  551,739  299,430    

Gold (grams per tonne)  6.48  6.62  8.26  7.29    

Gold production (ounces)  106,191  107,068  117,456  52,602    

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce basis):                 

 Production costs   $691   $641   $564   $636   $  

 Adjustments:                 

  Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  5  6  5      

  Inventory and other adjustments(i)  (1) 6  (40) 115    

  Non-cash reclamation provision  2  (3)       

 Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced(ii)   $697   $650   $529   $751   $  

Minesite costs per tonne(ii) C$115 C$110 C$114 C$140 C$  

122            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Kittila mine                 

Revenues from mining operations   $284,429   $225,612   $160,140   $61,457   $  

Production costs  98,037  110,477  87,740  42,464    

Operating margin  186,392  115,135  72,400  18,993    

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  30,091  26,574  31,488  10,909    

Gross profit   $156,301   $88,561   $40,912   $8,084   $  

Tonnes of ore milled  1,090,365  1,030,764  960,365  563,238    

Gold (grams per tonne)  5.68  5.11  5.41  5.02    

Gold production (ounces)  175,878  143,560  126,205  71,838    

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce basis):                 

 Production costs   $557   $770   $695   $648   $  

 Adjustments:                 

  Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  2  1  2      

  Inventory and other adjustments(i)  9  (10) (38) 24    

  Non-cash reclamation provision  (3) (1) (2) (4)   

  Stripping costs(iii)    (21)       

 Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced(ii)   $565   $739   $657   $668   $  

Minesite costs per tonne(ii)   €69   €75   €66   €54   €  

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            123

Table of Contents


Pinos Altos mine(iv)                 

Revenues from mining operations   $450,664   $378,329   $175,637   $14,182   $  

Production costs  152,942  145,614  90,293  11,819    

Operating margin  297,722  232,715  85,344  2,363    

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  36,830  36,989  21,577  1,524    

Gross profit   $260,892   $195,726   $63,767   $839   $  

Tonnes of ore processed  4,394,673  4,509,407  2,318,266  227,394    

Gold (grams per tonne)  2.02  1.80  1.95  1.08    

Gold production (ounces)  234,837  204,380  130,431  16,189    

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce basis):                 

 Production costs   $633   $712   $692   $1,227   $  

 Adjustments:                 

  Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges ��(300) (297) (192) (65)   

  Inventory and other adjustments(i)  11  9  22  (556)   

  Non-cash reclamation provision  (3) (6) (6) (10)   

  Stripping Costs(iii)  (55) (119) (91)     

 Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced(ii)   $286   $299   $425   $596   $  

Minesite costs per tonne(ii)   $31   $27   $35   $28   $  

124            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Meadowbank mine                 

Revenues from mining operations   $609,625   $434,051   $318,351   $   $  

Production costs  347,710  284,502  182,533      

Operating margin  261,915  149,549  135,818      

Amortization of property, plant and mine development  114,114  112,624  55,604      

Gross profit   $147,801   $36,925   $80,214   $   $  

Tonnes of ore milled  3,820,911  2,977,722  2,000,792      

Gold (grams per tonne)  3.17  3.02  4.34      

Gold production (ounces)  366,030  270,801  265,659      

Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced ($ per ounce basis):                 

 Production costs   $950   $1,051   $690   $   $  

 Adjustments:                 

  Byproduct metal revenues, net of smelting, refining and marketing charges  (5) (2) (2)     

  Inventory and other adjustments(i)  13  (6) 26      

  Non-cash reclamation provision  (4) (7) (5)     

  Stripping Costs(iii)  (41) (36) (16)     

 Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced(ii)   $913   $1,000   $693   $   $  

Minesite costs per tonne(ii) C$88 C$91 C$95 C$ C$  

Notes:

(1)(i)
Minesite costs per tonne andUnder the Company's revenue recognition policy, revenue is recognized on concentrates when legal title passes. As total cash costs per ounce of gold produced are calculated on a production basis, this inventory adjustment reflects the sales margin on the portion of concentrate production not yet recognized as revenue.

(ii)
Total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne are non-US GAAP measures of performance that the Company uses to monitor the performance of its operations. See "– Results of Operations – Production Costs" above.above for further detail.

(iii)
The Company reports total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne using a common industry practice of deferring certain stripping costs that can be attributed to future production. The purpose of adjusting for these stripping costs is to enhance the comparability of total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne to the Company's peers within the mining industry.

(iv)
Includes the Creston Mascota deposit at Pinos Altos except for fourth quarter 2012 total cash costs per ounce of gold produced and minesite costs per tonne, as heap leach operations at the Creston Mascota deposit were suspended effective October 1, 2012.

106            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            125

Table of Contents


   2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Goldex Mine                

Revenues from mining operations $225,090 $142,493 $38,286 $ $ 

Production costs  61,561  54,342  20,366     

Gross profit (exclusive of amortization shown below) $163,529 $88,151 $17,920 $ $ 

Amortization  21,428  21,716  7,250     

Gross profit $142,101 $66,435 $10,670 $ $ 

Tonnes of ore milled  2,781,564  2,614,645  1,118,543     

Gold – grams per tonne  2.21  1.98  1.86     

Gold production – ounces  184,386  148,849  57,436     

Total cash costs (per ounce):                

Production costs $333 $365 $430 $ $ 

Less:                

 Net byproduct revenues  4             

 Inventory adjustments  (1) 3  (9)    

 Accretion expense and other  (1) (1) (2)    

Total cash costs (per ounce)(1) $335 $367 $419 $ $ 

Minesite costs per tonne(1) C$22 C$23 C$27 C$ – C$ – 

Lapa Mine                

Revenues from mining operations $150,917 $43,409 $ $ $ 

Production costs  66,199  33,472       

Gross profit (exclusive of amortization shown below) $84,718 $9,937 $ $ $ 

Amortization  31,986  9,906       

Gross profit $52,732 $31 $ $ $ 

Tonnes of ore milled  551,739  299,430       

Gold – grams per tonne  8.26  7.29       

Gold production – ounces  117,456  52,602       

Total cash costs (per ounce):                

Production costs $564 $636 $ $ $ 

Less:                

 Net byproduct revenues  5         

 Inventory adjustments $(40) 115       

 Accretion expense and other           

Total cash costs (per ounce)(1) $529 $751 $ $ $ 

Minesite costs per tonne(1) $114 C$140 C$ – C$ – C$ – 

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            107

Table of Contents


Kittila Mine                

Revenues from mining operations $160,140 $61,457 $ $ $ 

Production costs  87,740  42,464       

Gross profit (exclusive of amortization shown below) $72,400 $18,993 $ $ $ 

Amortization  31,488  10,909       

Gross profit $40,912 $8,084 $ $ $ 

Tonnes of ore milled  960,365  563,238       

Gold – grams per tonne  5.41  5.02       

Gold production – ounces  126,205  71,838       

Total cash costs (per ounce):                

Production costs $695 $648 $ $ $ 

Less:                

 Net byproduct revenues  2         

 Inventory adjustments  (38) 24       

 Accretion expense and other  (2) (4)      

Total cash costs (per ounce)(1) $657 $668 $ $ $ 

Minesite costs per tonne(1) 66 54    

108            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


   2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  
   (thousands of United States dollars, except where noted) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Pinos Altos Mine                

Revenues from mining operations $175,637 $14,182 $ $ $ 

Production costs  90,293  11,819       

Gross profit (exclusive of amortization shown below) $85,344 $2,363 $ $ $ 

Amortization  21,577  1,524       

Gross profit $63,767 $839 $ $ $ 

Tonnes of ore milled  2,318,266  227,394       

Gold – grams per tonne  1.95  1.08       

Gold production – ounces  130,431  16,189       

Total cash costs (per ounce):                

Production costs $692 $1,227 $ $ $ 

Less: Net byproduct revenues  (192) (65)$ $ $ 

 Inventory adjustments  22  (556)      

 Accretion expense and other  (6) (10)      

 Stripping Costs (capitalized vs. expensed)  (91)        

Total cash costs (per ounce)(1) $425 $596 $ $ $ 

Minesite costs per tonne(1) $35 $28          

Meadowbank Mine                

Revenues from mining operations $318,351 $ $ $ $ 

Production costs  182,533         

Gross profit (exclusive of amortization shown below) $135,818 $ $ $ $ 

Amortization  55,604         

Gross profit $80,214 $ $ $ $ 

Tonnes of ore milled  2,000,792         

Gold – grams per tonne  4.34         

Gold production – ounces  265,659         

Total cash costs (per ounce):                

Production costs $690 $ $ $ $ 

Less: Net byproduct revenues  (2)        

 Inventory adjustments  26         

 Accretion expense and other  (5)        

 Stripping Costs (capitalized vs. expensed)  (16)        

Total cash costs (per ounce)(1) $693 $ $ $ $ 

Minesite costs per tonne(1) C$95 C$ – C$ – C$ – C$ – 

Note:

(1)
Minesite costs per tonne and total cash costs per ounce are non-US GAAP measures of performance that the Company uses to monitor the performance of its operations. See "– Results of Operations – Production Costs" above.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            109

Table of Contents


ITEM 6   DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

Directors and Senior Management

The articles of Agnico-Eaglethe Company provide for a minimum of five and a maximum of fifteen directors. By special resolution of the shareholders of Agnico-Eaglethe Company approved at the annual and special meeting of Agnico-Eaglethe Company held on June 27, 1996, the shareholders authorized the Board to determine the number of directors within thatthe minimum and maximum. The number of directors to be elected is fourteen as determined by the Board by resolution passed on February 14, 2011.

The by-laws of Agnico-Eagle provide that directors will hold office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of shareholders of Agnico-Eagle or until their successors are elected or appointed or the position is vacated. The Board annually appoints the officers of Agnico-Eagle, who are subject to removal by resolution of the Board at any time, with or without cause (in the absence of a written agreement to the contrary).

The following is a brief biography of each of Agnico-Eagle's directors:

Dr. Leanne M. Baker, 58, of Sebastopol, California, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Dr. Baker is Managing Directorthe President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Investor Resources LLC, which acts asSutter Gold Mining Inc. ("Sutter"), a consultant to companiesgold company that is developing its Lincoln Project in California's Mother Lode. Sutter's shares trade on the miningTSX Venture Exchange and financial services industries.the OTCQX. Previously, Dr. Baker was employed by Salomon Smith Barney where she was one of the top-ranked mining sector equity analysts in the United States. Dr. Baker is a graduate of the Colorado School of Mines (M.S. and Ph.D. in mineral economics). Dr. Baker has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since January 1, 2003, and is also a director of Reunion Gold Corporation (a mining exploration company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange), US Gold CorporationMcEwen Mining Inc. and Kimber Resources Inc. (mining exploration companies traded on the NYSE Arca and the TSX).Area of expertise: Corporate Finance and Mineral Economics.

Douglas R. Beaumont, P.Eng., 78, of Mississauga, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Beaumont, now retired, was most recently Senior Vice-President, Process Technology of SNC Lavalin. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice-President of Kilborn Engineering and Construction. Mr. Beaumont is a graduate of Queen's University (B.Sc.). Mr. Beaumont has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since February 25, 1997.Area of expertise: Mining and Metallurgy.

Sean Boyd, CA, 52, of Toronto, Ontario, is the Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Boyd has been with Agnico-Eagle since 1985. Prior to his appointment as Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in December 2005,February 2012, Mr. Boyd served as Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2005 to 2012 and as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1998 to 2005, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer from 1996 to 1998, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer from 1990 to 1996, Secretary Treasurer during a portion of 1990 and Comptroller from 1985 to 1990. Prior to joining Agnico-Eagle in 1985, he was a staff accountant with Clarkson Gordon (Ernst & Young). Mr. Boyd is a Chartered Accountant and a graduate of the University of Toronto (B.Comm.). Mr. Boyd has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since April 14, 1998.Area of expertise: Executive Management, Finance.

Martine A. Celej, 45, of Toronto, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. MsMs. Celej is currently thea Vice-President, Investment Advisor with RBC Dominion Securities and has been in the investment industry since 1989. She is a graduate of Victoria College at the University of Toronto (B.A. (Honours)). MsMs. Celej became a director of Agnico-Eagle on February 14, 2011.Area of expertise: Investment Management.

Clifford J. Davis, 68, of Kemble, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Davis is a mining industry veteran and formerly a member of the senior management teams of New Gold Inc., Gabriel Resources Ltd. and TVX Gold Inc. Mr. Davis is a graduate of the Royal School of Mines, Imperial College, London University (B.Sc., Mining Engineering). Mr. Davis has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since June 17, 2008 and is also a director and member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Audit Committee of Zenyatta Ventures Ltd.Area of expertise: Mining.

Robert J. Gemmell, 54, of Toronto, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Now retired, Mr. Gemmell spent 25 years as an investment banker in the United States and in Canada. Most recently, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup Global Markets Canada and its predecessor companies (Salomon Brothers Canada and Salomon Smith Barney Canada) from 1996 to 2008. In addition, he was a member of the Global Operating Committee of Citigroup Global Markets from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Gemmell is a graduate of Cornell University (B.A.), Osgoode Hall Law School (LL.B)(LL.B.) and the Schulich School of Business (M.B.A.). Mr. Gemmell became a director of Agnico-Eagle on January 1, 2011.Area of expertise: Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.

Bernard Kraft, CA, 80, of Toronto, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Kraft is a retired senior partner of the Toronto accounting firm Kraft, Berger LLP, Chartered Accountants and now serves as a consultant to that firm. He is also a principal in Kraft Yabrov Valuations Inc. Mr. Kraft is recognized as a Designated Specialist in Investigative and Forensic Accounting by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Mr. Kraft is a member of the Canadian Institute of

110126            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



of Chartered Business Valuators, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners and the American Society of Appraisers. Mr. Kraft has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since March 12, 1992, and is also a director and a member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of Estrella Gold Corporation, a director and a member of the Audit Committee, Governance Committee and Health, Safety and Environment Committee of St. Andrews Goldfields Limited and a director and a member of the Audit Committee of Harte Gold Corp.Area of expertise: Audit and Accounting.

Mel Leiderman, CPA, CA, TEP, ICD.D, 58, of Toronto, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Leiderman is the managing partner of the Toronto accounting firm Lipton LLP, Chartered Accountants. He is a graduate of the University of Windsor (B.A.) and is a certified director of the Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD.D). He has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since January 1, 2003.2003 and is also a director and a member of the Audit Committee and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee of Colossus Minerals Inc. and a director and a member of the Audit Committee of Morguard North American Residential REIT.Area of expertise: Audit and Accounting.

James D. Nasso, ICD.D, 77, of Toronto, Ontario, is Chairman of the Board of Directors and an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Nasso is now retired andretired. Mr. Nasso is a graduate of St. Francis Xavier University (B.Comm.) and is a certified director of the Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD.D). Mr. Nasso has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since June 27, 1986.Area of expertise: Management and Business Strategy.

Dr. Sean Riley, 57, of Antigonish, Nova Scotia, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Dr. Riley has served as President of St. Francis Xavier University since 1996. Prior to 1996, his career was in finance and management, first in corporate banking and later in manufacturing. Dr. Riley is a graduate of St. Francis Xavier University (B.A. (Honours)) and of Oxford University (M. Phil, D. Phil, International Relations)). Dr. Riley became a director of Agnico-Eagle on January 1, 2011.Area of Expertise: Management and Business Strategy.

J. Merfyn Roberts, CA, 60, of London, England, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Roberts has been a fund manager and investment advisor for more than 25 years and has been closely associated with the mining industry. Mr. Roberts is a graduate of Liverpool University (B.Sc., Geology) and Oxford University (M.Sc., Geochemistry) and is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. He has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since June 17, 2008, and is also a director and a member of the Audit Committee and of Eastern Platinum Limited, a director and a member of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee of Eastern Platinum Limited,Rambler Metals and Mining plc, a director and a member of the Remuneration Committee and Audit Committee of Rambler Metals and Mining plcMena Hydrocarbons Inc. and a director of Mena HydrocarbonsBlackheath Resources Inc.Area of expertise: Investment Management.

Eberhard Scherkus, P.Eng., 59, of Oakville, Ontario, is the President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Scherkus has been with Agnico-Eagle since 1985. Prior to his appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer in December 2005, Mr. Scherkus served as Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2005, as Vice-President, Operations from 1996 to 1998, as a manager of Agnico-Eagle LaRonde Division from 1986 to 1996 and as a project manager from 1985 to 1986. Mr. Scherkus is a graduate of McGill University (B.Sc.), a member of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario and past president of the Quebec Mining Association. Mr. Scherkus has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since January 17, 2005.Area of expertise: Executive Management, Mining.

Howard R. Stockford, P.Eng., 69, of Toronto, Ontario, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Stockford is a retired mining executive with almost 50 years of experience in the industry. Most recently, he was Executive Vice-President of Aur Resources Inc. ("Aur") and a director of Aur from 1984 until August 2007, when it was taken over by Teck Cominco Limited. Mr. Stockford has previously served as President of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum and is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada and the Society of Economic Geologists. Mr. Stockford is a graduate of the Royal School of Mines, Imperial College, London University, U.K. (B.Sc., Mining Geology). Mr. Stockford has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since May 6, 2005, and is also a director and a member of the Audit Committee, andCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Chairman of the Technical Committee of Victory Nickel Inc.Area of expertise: Executive Management, Mining.

Pertti Voutilainen, M.Sc., M.Eng., 69, of Espoo, Finland, is an independent director of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Voutilainen is a mining industry veteran. Most recently, he was the Chairman of the board of directors of Riddarhyttan Resources AB. Previously, Mr. Voutilainen was the Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of Kansallis Banking Group and President after its merger with Union Bank of Finland until his retirement in 2000. He was also employed by Outokumpu Corp., Finland's largest mining and metals company, for 26 years, including as Chief Executive Officer for 11 years. Mr. Voutilainen holds the honorary title of Mining Counselor (Bergsrad), which was awarded to him by the President of the Republic of Finland in 2003. Mr. Voutilainen is a graduate of Helsinki University of Technology (M.Sc.), Helsinki University of Business Administration (M.Sc.) and Pennsylvania State University (M.Eng.). He has been a director of Agnico-Eagle since December 13, 2005.Area of expertise: Mining and Finance.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            111

Table of Contents


The following is a brief biography of each of Agnico-Eagle's senior officers:

Ammar Al-JoundiDonald G. Allan, CA, 47, of Toronto, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Al-Joundi joined Agnico-Eagle as Senior Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer in 2010. Prior to joining Agnico-Eagle, Mr. Al-Joundi spent 11 years at Barrick Gold Corporation in various senior financial roles including Senior Vice-President of Finance, Senior Vice-President of Business Strategy and Capital Allocation and two years as Executive Director and CFO of Barrick South America. Prior to that, Mr. Al-Joundi spent eight years as an investment banker with Citibank Canada. Mr. Al-Joundi is a graduate of the Ivey Business School (M.B.A.) at the University of Western Ontario and is a graduate of the University of Toronto (B.Eng., Mechanical Engineering).

Donald G. Allan, 55, of Toronto, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Corporate Development of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since December 14, 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Allan had been Vice-President, Corporate Development since May 6, 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Allan spent 16 years as an investment banker covering the mining and natural resources sectors with the firms Salomon Smith Barney and Merrill Lynch. Mr. Allan is a graduate of the Amos Tuck School, Dartmouth College (M.B.A.) and the University of Toronto (B.Comm.). Mr. Allan is also qualified as a Chartered Accountant.

Alain Blackburn, P.Eng., 54, of Oakville, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Exploration of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since December 14, 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Blackburn had been Vice-President, Exploration since October 1, 2002. Prior

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            127

Table of Contents



to that, Mr. Blackburn served as Agnico-Eagle's Manager, Corporate Development from January 1999 and Exploration Manager from September 1996 to January 1999. Mr. Blackburn joined Agnico-Eagle in 1988 as Chief Geologist at the LaRonde mine. Mr. Blackburn is a graduate of UniversiteUniversité du Quebec de Chicoutimi (P.Eng.) and UniversiteUniversité du Quebec en Abitibi-Temiscamingue (M.Sc.).

Picklu Datta, CA, of Toronto, Ontario is Senior Vice-President, Treasury and Finance of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Datta was previously Vice-President, Treasurer and prior to that, he was Vice-President, Controller of Agnico-Eagle. Mr. Datta joined the Company in April 2005 and has worked in the mining industry for approximately ten years. Before joining the mining industry, Mr. Datta worked at Philip Morris Companies in New York City for approximately eight years and the technology industry for three years in various financial management roles. Mr. Datta obtained his Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Toronto and acquired his Chartered Accountancy designation by articling with Price Waterhouse Coopers.

Louise Grondin, Ing. P.Eng., 57, of Toronto, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Environment and Sustainable Development of Agnico-Eagle, a position she has held since January 1, 2011. Prior to that, Ms. Grondin was Vice President, Environment and Sustainable Development and before that she was the Regional Environmental Manager and Environmental Manager, LaRonde Division. Prior to her employment with Agnico-Eagle, Ms. Grondin worked for Billiton Canada Ltd. as Manager Environment, Human Resources and Safety. Ms. Grondin is a graduate of the University of Ottawa (B.Sc.) and McGill University (M.Sc.).

Tim Haldane, P.Eng., 54, of Sparks, Nevada,Tucson, Arizona, is Senior Vice-President, Latin America of Agnico-Eagle. Prior to joining Agnico-Eagle in May 2006, he was Vice President, Development for Glamis Gold Inc. where he participated in numerous acquisition and development activities in North America and Central America. Mr. Haldane is a graduate of the Montana School of Mines and Technology (B.S. Metallurgical Engineering) and has 30 years of experience in the precious metals and base metals industries.

R. Gregory Laing, B.A., LL.B., 52, of Oakville, Ontario, is General Counsel, Senior Vice-President, Legal and Corporate Secretary of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since December 14, 2006, prior to which, Mr. Laing had been General Counsel, Vice-President, Legal and Corporate Secretary since September 19, 2005. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Legal of Goldcorp Inc. from October 2003 to June 2005 and General Counsel, Vice President, Legal and Corporate Secretary of TVX Gold Inc. from October 1995 to January 2003. He worked as a corporate securities lawyer for two prominent Toronto law firms prior to that. Mr. Laing is a director of Andina Minerals Inc. (a mining exploration company), a TSX Venture Exchange listed company and HyWest Red Lake Gold Mines Inc. (a mining exploration company), traded on the Canadian National Stock Exchange. Mr. Laing is a graduate of the University of Windsor (LL.B.) and Queen's University (B.A.).

Daniel Racine, Ing., P.Eng.Marc H. Legault, P.Eng, 47,of Mississauga, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Project Evaluations of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since February 2012. Prior to that, he was Vice-President, Project Development since 2007. Mr. Legault has been with Agnico-Eagle since 1988, when he was hired as an exploration geologist in Val d'Or, Quebec. Since then, he has taken on successively increasing responsibilities in the Company's exploration, mine geology and project evaluation activities. Mr. Legault is a graduate of Carleton University (M.Sc. in geology in 1985) and Queen's University at Kingston (B.Sc.H. in Geological Engineering in 1982). Marc is a registered Professional Engineer. He is also a director of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a mining exploration company that trades on the TSX Venture Exchange.

Jean-Luk Pellerin, of Toronto, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Human Resources. Mr. Pellerin joined Agnico-Eagle in January 2012. Prior to that, he spent four years at Transat A.T. Inc. as Senior Vice-President, Human Resources and Chief Talent Officer. Before Transat, Mr. Pellerin spent six years in consulting at the helm of his own firm and as National Partner with Mercer Consulting. Prior to that, he held senior management and executive positions at Bombardier Inc., Domtar Corporation and General Electric. Mr. Pellerin has also taught in the MBA program at the H.E.C. Montreal in the Master's program in Organizational Development, as well as at American University and at the McGill International Executive Institute. Mr. Pellerin is a graduate of the University of Laval in Industrial Relations.

Jean Robitaille, of Oakville, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, OperationsTechnical Services and Project Development of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since June 2008. Prior to his appointment,that, he served Agnico-Eagle in various capacities for 22 years, including Vice-President, Operations, Operations Manager, LaRonde Mine Manager, Underground Superintendent and Mine Captain. Prior to joining Agnico-Eagle, Mr. Racine worked as a mining engineer for several mining companies. Mr. Racine graduated as a mining engineer from Laval University (B.Sc.) in December 1986.

Jean Robitaille, 48, of Oakville, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Technical Services of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since June 2008. Prior to his appointment, he served Agnico-Eagle in various capacities for more than 22 years,1988, most recently as Vice-President, Metallurgy & Marketing, General Manager, Metallurgy & Marketing and Mill Superintendent and Project Manager for the expansion of the LaRonde mill. Prior to joining Agnico-Eagle, Mr. Robitaille worked as a metallurgist with Teck Mining Group. Mr. Robitaille is a mining graduate of the College de l'Abitibi-Tél'Abitibi Témiscamingue with a specialty in mineral processing.

David Smith, P.Eng., 47, of Toronto, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Investor RelationsFinance and Chief Financial Officer of Agnico-Eagle, a position he has held since October 24, 2012. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice-President, Strategic Planning and Investor Relations, a position he held since January 1, 2011. Prior2011, and prior to that he was Senior Vice-President, Investor Relations and

128            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



prior to that he was Vice-President, Investor Relations. He started work in investor relations at Agnico-Eagle in February 2005. Prior to that, he was a mining analyst at Dominion Bond Rating Service for more than five years. Mr. Smith's professional experience also includes a variety of engineering positions in the mining industry, both in

112            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Canada and abroad. He is a graduate of Queen's University (B.Sc.) and the University of Arizona (M.Sc.). Mr. Smith is also a Professional Engineer.

Yvon Sylvestre, of Mississauga, Ontario, is Senior Vice-President, Operations, a position he has held since February 2012. Prior to that, he was Vice-President, Construction; Mine General Manager at the Goldex division of Agnico-Eagle and, previously, Mill Superintendent at the LaRonde division. Mr. Sylvestre is a Metallurgical Engineering Technology graduate from Cambrian College in Sudbury. Following graduation, he served as Metallurgist and Mill Superintendent at the Joutel division of Agnico-Eagle and also held the position of Mill Superintendent at the Trollus division of Inmet Mining Corporation.

There are no arrangements or understandings between any director or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which such director or executive officer was selected to serve, nor are there any family relationships between any such persons.


Compensation of Executive Officers

The senior officers of Agnico-Eagle are:

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            129

Table of Contents


The following Summary Compensation Table sets out compensation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102012 for the Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated officers of the Company (the "Named Executive Officers") of Agnico-Eagle measured by total compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 2008.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            1132010.

Table of Contents



Summary Compensation Table – Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited

          Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(1)
       
          
       
Name and Principal
Position
 Year Salary Share-
based
Awards
 Option-
based
Awards(2)
 Annual
Incentive
Plans
 Long-
Term
Incentive
Plans
 Pension
Value
 All Other
Compensation(3)
 Total
Compensation(4)
 

    (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Sean Boyd 2010 1,200,000 46,250 4,893,000 1,656,000 n/a 320,034 19,200 8,134,484 
Vice-Chairman and 2009 925,000 39,000 6,147,500 1,175,000 n/a 794,877 21,264 9,102,641 
Chief Executive Officer 2008 925,000 39,000 3,312,000 740,000 n/a 186,500 21,265 5,223,765 

Eberhard Scherkus 2010 775,000 33,000 2,854,250 775,000 n/a 51,758 19,200 4,508,208 
President and 2009 660,000 33,000 4,303,250 596,000 n/a 203,100 21,944 5,817,294 
Chief Operating Officer 2008 660,000 30,000 2,070,000 372,000 n/a 123,200 21,945 3,227,145 

Ammar Al-Joundi(5) 2010 151,635 7,308 1,615,500(6)322,000 n/a nil 5,908 2,102,351 
Senior Vice-President,                   
Finance and                   
Chief Financial Officer                   

David Garofalo(6) 2010 339,231 nil 1,631,000 nil n/a 9,378 12,838 1,992,447 
Senior Vice-President, 2009 410,000 nil 2,459,000 314,000 n/a 89,274 23,944 3,296,218 
Finance and 2008 410,000 nil 1,242,000 167,000 n/a 77,700 23,945 1,920,645 
Chief Financial Officer                   

Alain Blackburn 2010 425,000 15,600 1,631,000 344,000 n/a 25,350 19,200 2,460,150 
Senior Vice-President, 2009 340,000 15,600 2,459,000 260,000 n/a 70,050 23,444 3,168,094 
Exploration 2008 340,000 15,500 1,242,000 135,000 n/a 67,500 22,591 1,822,591 

Jean Robitaille 2010 400,000 17,000 1,223,250 246,000 n/a 19,650 20,200 1,926,100 
Senior Vice President, 2009 340,000 17,000 1,844,250 175,000 n/a 7,800 20,700 2,404,750 
Technical Services 2008 320,000 13,500 828,000 123,000 n/a 4,650 20,700 1,309,850 

            Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(1)
       
            
       
Name and
Principal Position
 Year Salary Share-
Based
Awards
(ESPP)(2)
 Share-
Based
Awards
(RSUs)(3)
 Option-
Based
Awards(4)
 Annual
Incentive
Plans
 Long-
Term
Incentive
Plans
 Pension
Value
 All Other
Compensation(5)
 Total
Compensation(6)
 

    (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) 
Sean Boyd 2012 1,300,000 32,500 937,573 2,700,750 3,000,000 n/a 1,519,437 19,200 9,509,460 
Vice-Chairman and 2011 1,260,000 52,000   4,120,800 1,197,000 n/a 257,642 95,005 6,982,447 
Chief Executive Officer 2010 1,200,000 46,250   4,893,000 1,656,000 n/a 320,034 19,200 8,134,484 

David Smith(7) 2012 465,962 16,500 468,787 623,250 495,000 n/a 144,144 29,910 2,243,553 
Senior Vice-President, Finance and 2011 330,000 15,000   1,030,200 350,000 n/a 102,000 21,200 1,848,400 
Chief Financial Officer 2010 300,000 11,600   1,060,150 175,000 n/a 76,050 20,700 1,643,500 

Ammar Al-Joundi(8) 2012 298,269 12,250 468,787 831,000 nil n/a 44,740 nil 1,655,046 
Senior Vice-President, Finance and 2011 490,000 23,750   1,030,200 457,000 n/a 119,080 56,202 2,176,232 
Chief Financial Officer 2010 151,635 7,308   1,615,500(9)322,000 n/a nil 5,908 2,102,351 

Alain Blackburn 2012 460,000 21,900 468,787 623,250 393,000 n/a 127,950 26,883 2,121,770 
Senior Vice-President, 2011 438,000 15,600   1,030,200 335,000 n/a 92,980 55,092 1,966,872 
Exploration 2010 425,000 15,600   1,631,000 344,000 n/a 25,350 19,200 2,460,150 

Donald G. Allan 2012 460,000 21,000 468,787 623,250 426,000 n/a 132,900 25,300 2,157,237 
Senior Vice-President, 2011 420,000 16,900   1,030,200 378,000 n/a 96,730 57,216 1,999,046 
Corporate Development 2010 400,000 13,000   1,223,250 276,000 n/a 78,950 19,700 2,010,900 

R. Gregory Laing 2012 450,000 21,000 468,787 623,250 417,000 n/a 130,050 24,800 2,134,887 
General Counsel, 2011 420,000 20,000   1,030,200 343,000 n/a 113,250 19,200 1,945,650 
Senior Vice-President, Legal and 2010 400,000 17,000   1,223,250 240,000 n/a 96,001 19,200 1,995,451 
Corporate Secretary                     

Notes:

(1)
All amounts earned on non-equity incentive plan compensation were paid during the financial year.

(2)
This represents the Company's contribution to shares purchased by the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Employee Share Purchase Plan.

(3)
These amounts represent the fair value of the restricted share units of the Company ("RSUs") granted to the respective Named Executive Officers. These amounts were calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs granted by the closing price of the Company's shares on the TSX on the day prior to the grant date. In 2012, RSU grants to the Named Executive Officers were based on a dollar amount determined by the Compensation Committee, which was divided by the 20-day volume-weighted average price of the Company's common shares on the TSX in order to determine the number of RSUs to be granted.

(4)
The value of option-based awards, being C$16.31 (20098.31 per Option (2011 – C$24.59; 200817.17; 2010 – C$16.56) per option,16.31), was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is a commonly used pricing model that assumes the valued option can only be exercised at expiration. All options other than those granted to Mr. Al-Joundi,purchase common shares of the Company ("Options") were granted at an exercise price of C$56.92 (200937.05 (2011 – C$62.77; 200876.60; 2010 – C$54.42)56.92), which was the closing price for the common shares of the Company on the TSX on the day prior to the date of grant. Key additional assumptions used were: (i) the risk free interest rate, which was 1.87% (20091.22% (2011 – 1.3%1.96%; 20082010 – 3.70%1.87%); (ii) current time to expiration of the optionOption which was assumed to be 2.7 years (2011 – 2.5 years; 2010 – 2.5 years); (iii) the volatility for the common shares of the Company on the TSX, which was 44% (200937.5% (2011 – 64%34.63%; 20082010 – 44.37%44%); and (iv) the dividend yield for the common shares of the Company, which was 0.43% (20092.16% (2011 – 0.42%0.88%; 20082010 – 0.22%0.43%).

(3)(5)
Consists of premiums paid for term life and health insurance, automobile allowances, and education and fitness benefits and, beginning in 2011, extended health coverage and computer-related allowances for the Named Executive Officers.

(4)(6)
The total compensation was paid in Canadian dollars. The Company reports its financial statements in United States dollars. On December 31, 20102012 the Noon Buying Rate was C$1.00 equals US$0.9946.1.0051

(5)(7)
Mr. Smith became Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on October 24, 2012; prior to that, he was the Senior Vice-President, Strategic Planning and Investor Relations of the Company.

(8)
Mr. Al-Joundi resigned as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on July 9, 2012.

(9)
Mr. Al-Joundi joined the Company as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on September 1, 2010 and received a grant of optionsOptions with a Black-Scholes value of C$21.5414.46 on that date based an exercise price of C$69.44, a risk-free interest rate of 2.53%1.51%, a time to expiration of 5 years, a volatility of 34.7%31.4% and dividend yield of 1.02%0.24%.

(6)
Mr. Garofalo resigned as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on July 9, 2010.

114130            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


RSU Plan

The Restricted Share Unit Plan (the "RSU Plan") was established by the Company to assist in the retention of the Company's employees, officers and directors by providing non-dilutive common shares to reward the individual performance of participants. Grants of RSUs are determined by the Compensation Committee (for directors and officers) or the Chief Executive Officer (for employees). RSUs vest in accordance with the vesting periods specified in the RSU Plan, which for officers and directors is on December 31 in the third year after the date of the grant of the RSU. Dividends declared on non-vested RSUs are used to purchase additional RSUs, which have the same vesting dates and expiry dates as the RSUs in respect of which such additional RSUs are added. Once vested, the common shares underlying the RSUs are transferred to a participant's vested RSU account and may be sold at the request of the participant.

If a participant's employment with the Company terminates as a result of a change of control or constructive termination within a six month period following a change of control, the participant's RSUs vest immediately. If a participant's employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the RSU Plan), the participant immediately forfeits all rights in respect of any non-vested RSUs. If a participant's employment is terminated without cause or if the participant retires or resigns from the service of the Company (including, for directors, resigning from the Board of Directors), dies while in the service of the Company or becomes disabled such that the participant receives benefits under the Company's long-term disability plan, the participant's non-vested RSUs vest immediately. The rights and obligations of the Company under the RSU Plan may be assigned by the Company to a successor in the business of the Company, to any corporation resulting from any amalgamation, reorganization, combination, merger or arrangement of the Company or to any corporation acquiring all or substantially all of the assets or business of the Company.

Stock Option Plan

Under the Stock Option Plan, optionsOptions to purchase common shares may be granted to directors, officers, employees and service providersconsultants of the Company. The exercise price of optionsOptions granted may be denominated in Canadian dollars or United States dollars, but generally may not be less than the closing market price for the common shares of the Company on the TSX (for Options with an exercise price denominated in Canadian dollars) or the NYSE (for Options with an exercise price denominated in United States dollars) on the trading day prior to the date of grant. The maximum term of optionsOptions granted under the Stock Option Plan is five years and the maximum number of optionsOptions that can be issued in any year is 2% of the Company's outstanding common shares. In addition, a maximum of 25% of the optionsOptions granted in an optionOption grant vest upon the date they are granted with the remaining optionsOptions vesting equally on the next three anniversaries of the optionOption grant. The value of optionsOptions granted to non-executive directors participating in the Stock Option Plan is limited to C$100,000 per year.year; however, in July 2011, the Board amended its director compensation program such that non-executive directors now receive RSUs instead of Options. The number of common shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one person pursuant to Options (under the Stock Option Plan or otherwise), warrants, share purchase plans or other compensation arrangements may not exceed 5% of the outstanding common shares. Additionally, the number of common shares which may be issuable to insiders of the Company pursuant to Options (under the Stock Option Plan or otherwise), warrants, share purchase plans or other compensation arrangements, at any time, cannot exceed 10% of outstanding common shares and the number of common shares issued to insiders of the Company pursuant to Options (under the Stock Option Plan or otherwise), warrants, share purchase plans or other compensation arrangements, within any one year period, cannot exceed 10% of the outstanding common shares.

The Stock Option Plan provides for the termination of an optionOption held by an optionOption holder in the following circumstances:

An optionOption granted under the Stock Option Plan may only be assigned to eligible assignees, including a spouse, a minor child, a minor grandchild, a trust governed by a registered retirement savings plan of an eligiblesuch participant, a corporation controlled by such participant and of which all other shareholders are eligible assignees or a family trust of which the eligiblesuch participant is a trustee and of which all beneficiaries are eligible assignees. Assignments must be approved by the Board of Directors and any stock exchange or other authority.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            131

Table of Contents


The Board of Directors may amend or revise the terms of the Stock Option Plan without the approval of shareholders as permitted by law and subject to any required approval by any stock exchange or other authority including amendments of a "housekeeping" nature, amendments necessary to comply with the provisions of applicable law (including, without limitation, the rules, regulations and policies of the TSX), amendments respecting administration of the Stock Option Plan (provided such amendment does not entail an extension beyond the original expiry date), any amendment to the vesting provisions of the Stock Option Plan or any option,Option, any amendment to the early termination provisions of the Stock Option Plan or any option,Option, whether or not such optionOption is held by an insider provided(provided such amendment does not entail an extension beyond the original expiry date,date), the addition or modification of a cashless exercise feature, amendments necessary to suspend or terminate the Stock Option Plan and any other amendment, whether fundamental or otherwise, not requiring shareholder approval under applicable law (including, without limitation, the rules, regulations and policies of the TSX). No amendment or revision to the Stock Option Plan which adversely affects the rights of any optionOption holder under any optionOption granted under the Stock Option Plan can be made without the consent of the optionOption holder whose rights are being affected.

In addition, no amendments to the Stock Option Plan to increase the maximum number of common shares reserved for issuance, to changereduce the exercise price for any Option, to extend the term of an Option, to increase any limit on grants of Options to insiders of the Company, to amend the designation of who is an eligible participant to extend the term of an option held by an insider, to increase any limit on grants of options to insiders of the Company,or eligible assignee, to change the participation limits in any given year for non-executive directors or to decreasegrant additional powers to the prices at which options can be exercised orBoard to amend the amending provisions of the Stock Option Plan or entitlements can be made without first obtaining the approval of the Company's shareholders. In response to a TSX staff notice regarding amendments to security based compensation arrangements, the Stock Option Plan was amended in 2007 such that where the Company has imposed trading restrictions on directors and officers that fall within ten trading days of the expiry of an option,Option, such option'sOption's expiry date shall be the tenth day following the termination of such restrictions. The Stock Option Plan does not expressly entitle participants to convert an optionOption into a stock appreciation right.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            115

Table of Contents


Under the Stock Option Plan, only eligible persons who are not directors or officers of the Company are entitled to receive loans (on a non-recourse or limited recourse basis or otherwise), guarantees or other support arrangements from the Company to facilitate optionOption exercises. During 2010,2012, no loans, guarantees or other financial assistance waswere provided under the plan.Stock Option Plan.

The number of common shares currently reserved for issuance under the Stock Option Plan is 9,366,90514,099,411 common shares (comprised of 9,082,77011,750,991 common shares relating to optionsOptions issued but unexercised and 284,1352,348,420 common shares relating to optionsOptions available to be issued), being 5.54%representing 8.2% of the Company's 168,944,915172,501,169 common shares issued and outstanding as at March 18, 2011.11, 2013.

In 2012, officers exercised Options to receive notional proceeds of, in aggregate, C$1,185,380.50 (7 people) (C$4,089,391 (7 people) in 2011); C$21,775,538 (17 people) in 2010). In 2012, the Company received proceeds from the exercise of Options in the amount of C$6,360,030 (C$3,822,087 in 2011 and C$76,129,773 in 2010).

The following table sets out the value vested during the most recently completed financial year of the Company of incentive plan awards granted to the Named Executive Officers.


Incentive Plan Awards Table – Value Vested or Earned During Fiscal Year 20102012

Name Option-Based
Awards –
Value Vested
During the Year
 Share-Based
Awards –
Value Vested
During the Year
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation –
Value Earned
During the Year

  (C$) (C$) (C$)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Sean Boyd 605,250 n/a 1,656,000

Eberhard Scherkus 405,875 n/a 775,000

Ammar Al-Joundi nil n/a 322,000

David Garofalo 122,563 n/a nil

Alain Blackburn 122,563 n/a 344,000

Daniel Racine 190,193 n/a 246,000

The following table sets out the outstanding option awards of the Named Executive Officers as at December 31, 2010.

NameOption-Based
Awards –
Value Vested
During the Year
Share-Based
Awards –
Value Vested
During the Year
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation –
Value Earned
During the Year

(C$)(C$)(C$)
Sean Boydniln/a3,000,000

David Smithniln/a495,000

Ammar Al-Joundiniln/anil

Alain Blackburnniln/a393,000

Donald G. Allanniln/a426,000

R. Gregory Laingniln/a417,000

116132            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The following table sets out the outstanding Option awards of the Named Executive Officers as at December 31, 2012.


Outstanding Incentive Plan Awards Table

 Option-Based Awards Share-Based AwardsOption-Based Awards Share-Based Awards
 
 

 
Name Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options
 Option
Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Value of Unexercised
In-The-Money
Options(1)
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Shares
that have
not Vested
 Market or
Payout
Value of
Share-Based
Awards
that have
not Vested
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
 Option
Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Value of
Unexercised
In-The-Money
Options(1)
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Shares
that have
not Vested
 Market or
Payout Value
of Share Based
Awards
that have
not Vested(1)
 Market or
Payout Value
of Vested
Share Based
Awards
not Paid Out
or Distributed
 

 (#) (C$)   (C$) (#) (C$)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(#) (C$)   (C$) (#) (C$) (C$) 
Sean Boyd 100,000 48.09 1/2/2012 2,851,000 nil nil200,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 24,660 1,285,525.80 nil 
 200,000 54.42 1/2/2013 4,436,000    250,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil       
 250,000 62.77 1/2/2014 3,457,500    300,000 56.92 1/4/2015 nil       
 300,000 56.92 1/4/2015 5,904,000    240,000 76.60 1/4/2016 nil       


325,000 37.05 1/3/2017 4,901,000       
Eberhard Scherkus 75,000 48.09 1/2/2012 2,138,250 nil nil


David Smith15,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 12,330 642,762.90 nil 
65,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil       
 125,000 54.42 1/2/2013 2,772,500    65,000 56.92 1/4/2015 nil       
 175,000 62.77 1/2/2014 2,420,250    60,000 76.60 1/4/2016 nil       
 175,000 56.92 1/4/2015 3,444,000    75,000 37.05 1/7/2017 1,131,000       

Ammar Al-Joundi 75,000 69.44 9/1/2015 537,000 nil nil75,000 69.44 9/1/2015 nil nil nil nil 


60,000 76.60 1/4/2016 nil       
David Garofalo nil n/a n/a n/a nil nil

Alain Blackburn 39,750 54.42 1/2/2013 881,655 nil nil39,750 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 12,330 642,762.90 nil 
 100,000 62.77 1/2/2014 1,383,000    100,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil       
 100,000 56.92 1/4/2015 1,968,000    100,000 56.92 1/4/2015 nil       


60,000 76.60 1/4/2016 nil       
Jean Robitaille 40,000 48.09 1/2/2012 1,140,400 nil nil
75,000 37.05 1/3/2017 1,131,000       


Donald G. Allan30,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 12,330 642,762.90 nil 
 50,000 54.42 1/2/2013 1,109,000    75,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil       
 10,000 66.74 6/26/2013 98,600    75,000 56.92 1/4/2015 nil       
 75,000 62.77 1/2/2014 1,037,250    60,000 76.60 1/4/2016 nil       
 75,000 56.92 1/4/2015 1,476,000    56,250 37.05 1/3/2017 848,250       



R. Gregory Laing60,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 12,330 642,762.90 nil 
75,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil       
75,000 56.92 1/4/2015 nil       
60,000 76.60 1/4/2016 nil       
75,000 37.05 1/3/2017 1,131,000       


Note:

(1)
Based on a closing price of the Company's shares on the TSX of $76.60C$52.13 on December 31, 2010.2012. On December 31, 2010,2012, the Noon Buying Rate was C$1.00 equals US$0.9946.1.0051.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            133

Table of Contents


The following table shows,sets out, as at December 31, 2010,2012, compensation plans under which equity securities of Agnico-Eaglethe Company are authorized for issuance from treasury. The information has been aggregated by plans approved by shareholders and plans not approved by shareholders of(of which there are none.none).


Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category Number of
securities to
be issued on
exercise of
outstanding options
 Weighted average
exercise price
of outstanding
options
 Number of
securities
remaining available
for future
issuances
under equity
compensation plans

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders 6,762,704 C$  56.94 2,771,420

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders nil nil nil

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            117

Table of Contents


Plan Category Number of securities
to be issued on
exercise of
outstanding options
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuances under
equity compensation plans
 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders 10,587,126 C$56.60 3,717,785 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders nil nil nil 

Employee Share Purchase Plan

In 1997, the shareholders of Agnico-Eaglethe Company approved the Employee Share Purchase Plan to encourage directors, officers and full-time employees of Agnico-Eaglethe Company to purchase common shares of Agnico-Eagle.the Company. In 2009, the Employee Share Purchase Plan was amended to prohibit non-executive directors from participating in the plan. Full-time employees who have been continuously employed by Agnico-Eaglethe Company or its subsidiaries for at least twelve months are eligible at the beginning of each fiscal year to elect to participate in the Employee Share Purchase Plan. Eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of their basic annual salary through monthly payroll deductions or quarterly payments by cheque. Agnico-EagleThe Company contributes an amount equal to 50% of the individual's contributions and issues common shares whichthat have a market value equal to the total contributions (individual and Company) under the Employee Share Purchase Plan. In 2008, the shareholders of Agnico-Eaglethe Company approved an amendment to the Employee Share Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares available under such plan to 5,000,000 common shares. Of the 5,000,000 common shares approved, Agnico-Eaglethe Company has, as ofat March 18, 2011, reserved 2,510,92111, 2013, 1,643,794 common shares remaining for issuance under the Employee Share Purchase Plan.

Pension Plan Benefits

The Company's basic defined contribution pension plan (the "Basic Plan") provides pension benefits to employees of Agnico-Eaglethe Company generally, including the Named Executive Officers. Under the Basic Plan, the Company contributes an amount equal to 15% of each designated executive's pensionable earnings (including salary and short-term bonus) to the Basic Plan. The Company's contributions cannot exceed the money purchase limit, as defined in theIncome Tax Act (Canada). Upon termination, the Company's contribution to the Basic Plan ceases and the participant is entitled to a pension benefit in the amount of the vested account balance. All contributions to the Basic Plan are invested in a variety of funds offered by the plan administrator, at the direction of the participant.

In addition to the Basic Plan, effective January 1, 2008, in line with the Company's compensation policy that compensation must be competitive in order to help attract and retain the executives needed to lead and grow the Company's business and to address the weakness of the Company's retirement benefits when compared to its peers in the gold production industry, the Company adopted a supplemental defined contribution plan (the "Supplemental Plan") for designated executives at the level of Vice-President or above. On December 31 of each year, the Company credits each designated executive's account an amount equal to 15% of the designated executive's pensionable earnings for the year (including salary and short term bonus), less the Company's contribution to the Basic Plan. In addition, on December 31 of each year, the Company will credit each designated executive's account a notional investment return equal to the balance of such designated executive's account at the beginning of the year multiplied by the yield rate for Government of Canada marketable bonds with average yields over ten years. Upon retirement, after attaining the minimum age of 55, the designated executive's account will be paid out in either (a) five annual installments subsequent to the date of retirement, or (b) by way of lump sum payment, at the executive's option. If the designated executive's employment is terminated prior to reaching the age of 55, such designated executive will receive, by way of lump sum payment, the total amount credited to his or her account.

Individual134            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The individual Retirement Compensation Arrangement PlansPlan (the "RCA Plans"Plan") for Messrs.Mr. Boyd and Scherkus provideprovides pension benefits which are generally equal (on an after-tax basis) to what the pension benefits would be if they were provided directly from a registered pension plan. There are no pension benefit limits under the RCA Plans.Plan. The RCA Plans providePlan provides an annual pension at age 60 equal to 2% of the executive's final three-year average pensionable earnings for each year of continuous service with the Company, less the annual pension payable under the Company's Basic Plan. The pensionable earnings for the purposes of the RCA Plans consistPlan consists of all basic remuneration and do not include benefits, bonuses, automobile or other allowances, or unusual payments. Payments under the RCA PlansPlan are secured by a letter of credit from a Canadian chartered bank. Messrs.Mr. Boyd and Scherkus may retire early, any time after reaching age 55, with a benefit based on service and final average earnings at the date of retirement, with no early retirement reduction. The Company does not have a policy to grant extra years of service under its pension plans.

The following table sets forthout the benefits to Messrs.Mr. Boyd and Scherkus and the associated costs to the Company in excess of the costs under the Company's Basic Plan.

118            
AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Defined Benefit PlansPlan Table

   Annual Benefits
Accrued
           Annual Benefits
Accrued
         
   
           
         
Name Number of Years of Service(1) At Year End(1) At age 60 Accrued Obligation at the Start of the Year Compensatory Change Non-
Compensatory Change
 Accrued Obligation at Year End Number of
Years of
Service(1)
 At Year
End(1)
 At age 60 Accrued
Obligation at
the Start of
the Year(2)
 Compensatory
Change(3)
 Non-
Compensatory
Change(4)
 Accrued
Obligation at
Year End(5)
 

 (#) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (#) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Sean Boyd 25 713,824 955,718 3,986,471 320,034 1,923,659 6,230,164 27 765,223 1,079,902 7,909,256 1,495,617 1,251,952 10,656,825 



Eberhard Scherkus 25 345,458 368,800 3,103,450 51,758 1,108,078 4,263,286

Notes:

(1)
As at December 31, 20102012.

(2)
The actuarial valuation methods and assumptions that the Company applied in quantifying the accrued obligation at the start of the year are the same as those set out in note 6 to the Company's annual audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011.

(3)
Includes the value of the pension earned during the year, the impact of any plan amendments and of any differences between actual and assumed compensation.

(4)
Includes the impact of interest accruing on the beginning-of-year obligation and changes in the actuarial assumptions and other experience gains and losses.

(5)
The actuarial valuation methods and assumptions that the Company applied in quantifying the accrued obligation at year end are the same as those set out in note 6 to the Company's annual audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The following tables set forthout summary information about the Basic Plan and the Supplemental Plan for each of the Named Executive Officers as at December 31, 2010.2012.


Defined ContributionsContribution Plan Table – Basic Plan

Name Accumulated Value at
Start of Year
 Compensatory Non-
Compensatory
 Accumulated Value at
Year End
 Accumulated Value
at Start of Year
 Compensatory(1) Non-
Compensatory(2)
 Accumulated Value
at Year End
 

 (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) 
Sean Boyd 345,477 nil 52,103 397,580 392,972 23,820 34,110 450,902 

Eberhard Scherkus 323,258 nil 30,115 353,373

David Garofalo(1) 199,891 nil 20,105 219,996

Jean Robitaille 195,503 nil 37,617 233,120
David Smith 114,126 23,820 10,187 148,133 

Ammar Al-Joundi 0 nil 22,450 22,450 40,950 23,820 451 65,221 

Alain Blackburn 232,283 nil 55,325 287,608 286,328 23,820 29,529 339,677 



Donald G. Allan 183,762 23,820 21,066 228,648 


R. Gregory Laing 121,840 23,820 11,742 157,402 


Notes:

(1)
Mr. Garofalo resigned as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on July 9, 2010.

Defined Contributions Plan Table – Supplemental Plan

Name Accumulated
Value at
Start of Year
 Compensatory Non-
Compensatory
 Accumulated Value at Year End

  (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Sean Boyd(1) nil nil nil nil

Eberhard Scherkus(1) nil nil nil nil

David Garofalo(2) 154,824 9,378 13,735 177,937

Jean Robitaille 105,677 19,650 58,509 183,836

Ammar Al-Joundi(3) nil nil nil nil

Alain Blackburn 120,300 25,350 71,773 217,423

(1)
Messrs. Boyd and Scherkus do not participate inIncludes the Supplemental Plan.total amount contributed by the Company to the member's account during 2012.

(2)
Mr. Garofalo resigned as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerIncludes all investment income earned on July 9, 2010.

(3)
Mr. Al-Joundi was not eligible to be a member of the Supplemental Plan as of December 31, 2010.member's account balances during 2012.

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            119135

Table of Contents



Defined Contribution Plan Table – Supplemental Plan

Name Accumulated Value
at Start of Year
 Compensatory(1) Non-
Compensatory(2)
 Accumulated Value
at Year End
 

  (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) 
Sean Boyd(3) nil nil nil nil 

David Smith 199,805 120,324 4,536 324,665 

Ammar Al-Joundi 119,080 20,920 1,441 141,441 

Alain Blackburn 315,664 104,130 7,166 426,960 

Donald G. Allan 288,962 109,080 6,559 404,601 

R. Gregory Laing 276,981 106,230 6,287 389,498 

Notes:

(1)
Includes the total amount notionally credited by the Company to the member's account during 2012. There was no above market investment income credited under the Supplemental Plan.

(2)
Includes all investment income earned on the member's notional account balances during 2012.

(3)
Mr. Boyd does not participate in the Supplemental Plan.

In 2012, the Company's Human Resources department conducted an internal market analysis using publicly available information from the Company's peer group and surveys provided by different compensation firms, notably the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2012 "Mining Industry Salary Survey – Corporate Report". The information was used by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors in recommending and approving the salary adjustments to market and the bonus targets for the Company's senior executives.

The Compensation Committee did not retain an executive compensation consultant to provide it with recommendationsalso retained Meridian Compensation Partners in 2010. The Company's management retained Mercer (Canada) Limited ("Mercer")2012 to provide consulting services with respect to an assessmentdesigning a structure to better align the Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer's compensation with the interests of its industry peer group's executive compensation plansthe Company's shareholders and the implementationperformance of its new flex benefits program for all employees. The information provided by Mercer was not used by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors in recommending or approving, respectively, the compensation of Agnico-Eagle's officers.Company's common shares.


Executive Compensation-Related Fees

Name of Firm Year Amount Paid for
Compensation-Related
Services
 

    (C$) 
Mercer (Canada) Limited 2011 29,275 

Meridian Compensation Partners 2012 16,419 

Employment Contracts/Termination Arrangements

Agnico-EagleThe Company has employment agreements with all of its executive officers whichthat provide for an annual base salary, bonus and certain pension, health, dental and other insurance and automobile benefits. These amounts may be increased at the discretion of the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. For the current2012 base salary for each Named Executive Officer, see "Summary Compensation Table" above. If the individual agreements are terminated other than for cause, death or disability, or upon their resignation following certain events, all of the Named Executive Officers would be entitled to a payment equal to two and one-half times their annual base salary at the date of termination plus an amount equal to two and one-half times their annual bonus (averaged over the preceding two years but not including options)Options) and a continuation of benefits for up to two and one-half years (or, at the election of the employee, the amount equal to the Company's cost in providing such benefits) or until the individual commences new employment. Certain events that would trigger a severance payment are:

136            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


If a severance payment triggering event had occurred on December 31, 2010,2012, the severance payments that would be payable to each of the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Al-Joundi, would be approximately as follows: Mr. Boyd – $6,586,750;C$8,544,250; Mr. ScherkusSmith – $3,699,250; Mr. Al-Joundi – $1,554,770;C$2,256,025; Mr. Blackburn – $1,865,500;C$2,127,208; Mr. Allan – C$2,218,250; and Mr. RobitailleLaing – $1,576,750.C$2,137,000.

Other than Mr. Boyd, none of the directors of the Company are party to a service contract with the Company or any of its subsidiaries that provides for benefits payable to such director upon termination of employment.

Compensation of Directors and Other Information

Mr. Boyd, who is a director and the Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr. Scherkus, who is a director and the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, dodoes not receive any remuneration for theirhis services as directorsdirector of the Company.

The tablestable below summarizesets out the annual retainers (annual retainers for the Chairs of the Board of Directors and other Committees are in addition to the base annual retainer) fees paid to the other directors during the year ended December 31, 2010.2012. Directors do not receive meeting attendance fees.

  Compensation during
the period between
January 1, 2010 andyear ending
December 31, 20102012

Annual Board retainer (base) C$  115,000120,000

Additional Annual retainer for Chairman of the Board C$  125,000120,000

Additional Annual retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee C$25,000

Additional Annual retainer for ChairpersonsChairs of other Board Committees C$    10,000

Meeting attendance fees10,000 

Effective as of July 1, 2011, director compensation was amended to more closely align the equity component of director compensation with shareholder interests by discontinuing the former practice of granting Options to non-executive directors and replacing such Option grants with grants of RSUs. As the value of RSUs tracks the value of the Company's common shares, the equity value of director compensation will now correspond directly with share price movements, thereby more closely aligning director and shareholder interests.

In January 2012 and 2013, each director was entitled to receive an annual grant of 3,000 RSUs (the Chairman of the Board was entitled to receive 4,000 RSUs in 2012 and 5,000 RSUs in 2013). However, if a director meets the minimum share ownership requirement (as described under "Director Shareholding Guidelines" below), he or she can elect to receive cash in lieu of a portion of the RSUs to be granted, subject to receipt of a minimum annual grant of 1,000 RSUs.

Director Shareholding Guidelines

To more closely align the interests of directors with those of shareholders, directors other(other than Messrs. Boyd and Scherkus,Mr. Boyd) are required to own the equivalenta minimum of at least three years of their annual retainer fee in10,000 common shares of Agnico-Eagle.the Company and/or RSUs. Directors have a period of the later of: (i) two years from the date of adoption of this policy (that is, August 24, 2013) or (ii) five years from the date of joining the Board, to achieve this ownership level through open market purchases. In addition,purchases of common shares, grants of RSUs or the exercise of Options held.

As of March 11, 2013, all of the directors have satisfied the minimum share ownership requirement, other than Dr. Riley who has until January 1, 2016 and Ms. Celej who has until February 14, 2016 (five years from the date each became a director) to satisfy the minimum share ownership requirement.

120            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            137

Table of Contents



director is eligible to be granted options under Agnico-Eagle's Stock Option Plan. Individual grants are determined annually by the Compensation Committee based on performance evaluations for each director and are subject to an annual limit of the lesser of: (a) 1% of the common shares outstanding at any point in time; and (b) an annual equity award value per director of C$100,000.

The table below sets out the number and the value of common shares and RSUs held by each director of the Company as of March 18, 2011Company.

  Aggregate common shares and RSUs owned by each director and
aggregate value thereof as at March 11, 2013
  
Name Aggregate
Number of
Common
Shares
 Aggregate
Value of
Common
Shares(1)
 Aggregate
Number of
RSUs
 Aggregate
Value of
RSUs(1)
 Deadline to
meet Guideline
 

  (#) (C$) (#) (C$)   
Leanne M. Baker 5,500 220,000 6,000 240,000 Meets Guideline 

Douglas R. Beaumont 17,960 718,400 2,000 80,000 Meets Guideline 

Sean Boyd 41,142 1,645,680 124,660 4,986,400 Meets CEO Guideline(2) 

Martine A. Celej 2,000 80,000 6,000 240,000 February 14, 2016 

Clifford J. Davis 6,000 240,000 6,000 240,000 Meets Guideline 

Robert J. Gemmell 10,000 400,000 6,000 240,000 Meets Guideline 

Bernard Kraft 12,657 506,280 2,000 80,000 Meets Guideline 

Mel Leiderman 6,000 240,000 6,000 240,000 Meets Guideline 

James D. Nasso 18,289 731,560 5,000 200,000 Meets Guideline 

Sean Riley 2,000 80,000 6,000 240,000 January 1, 2016 

John Merfyn Roberts 6,000 240,000 6,000 240,000 Meets Guideline 

Howard R. Stockford 7,068 282,720 4,000 160,000 Meets Guideline 

Pertti Voutilainen 14,800 592,000 2,000 80,000 Meets Guideline 

Notes:

(1)
The valuation is calculated based on the closing price of the commonCompany's shares of $65.55 on the TSX of C$40.00 on such day.

  Aggregate common shares owned by directors and aggregate value thereof as of March 18, 2011
  
Name Aggregate Common Shares Aggregate Value of Common Shares

    (C$)
Leanne M. Baker 5,500 360,525

Douglas R. Beaumont 17,960 1,177,278

Sean Boyd 113,902 7,466,276

Martine A. Celej 1,000 65,550

Clifford J. Davis 6,000 393,300

Robert J. Gemmell 5,000 327,750

Bernard Kraft 12,657 829,666

Mel Leiderman 5,500 360,525

James D. Nasso 18,289 1,198,844

Sean Riley 1,000 65,550

John Merfyn Roberts 6,000 393,300

Eberhard Scherkus 71,229 4,669,061

Howard R. Stockford 6,068 397,757

Pertti Voutilainen 12,000 786,600

With respectMarch 11, 2013.

(2)
Mr. Boyd is subject to the following tables, Ms Celej, Mr. Gemmell and Dr. Riley are not included as they did not become membersChief Executive Officer shareholding requirements set out under "– Share Ownership" below.

138            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of the Board of Directors until 2011.Contents


The following table sets out the compensation provided to the members of the Board of Directors, other than Messrs.Mr. Boyd, and Scherkus, for the Company's most recently completed financial year.

2010
Director Compensation Table – 2012

Name Fees
Earned
 Share-
Based
Awards(1)
 Option-
Based
Awards(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
 Pension
Value
 All Other
Compensation
 Total(4) 

  (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) 
Leanne M. Baker 145,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 259,060 

Douglas R. Beaumont 120,000 38,020 n/a 81,100 n/a n/a 239,120 

Martine A.Celej 120,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 234,060 

Clifford J. Davis 130,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 244,060 

Robert Gemmell 130,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 244,060 

Bernard Kraft 120,000 38,020 n/a 81,100 n/a n/a 239,120 

Mel Leiderman 120,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 234,060 

James D. Nasso 240,000 152,080 n/a n/a n/a n/a 392,080 

John Merfyn Roberts 130,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 244,060 

Sean Riley 120,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 234,060 

Howard R. Stockford 120,000 114,060 n/a n/a n/a n/a 234,060 

Pertti Voutilainen 120,000 38,020 n/a 81,100 n/a n/a 239,120 

Notes:

(1)
The valuation of the grants of RSUs was calculated based on the closing price of the Company's common shares on the TSX of C$38.02 on January 4, 2012, the day prior to the date of the grant.

(2)
Option-based awards are no longer granted to non-executive directors.

(3)
A director who satisfies the minimum shareholding requirement may elect to receive cash in lieu of a portion of his or her grant of RSUs.

(4)
Set out in Canadian dollars. On December 31, 2012 the noon buying rate as reported by the Bank of Canada (the "Noon Buying Rate") was C$1.00 equals $1.0051.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            121139

Table of Contents


Director Compensation Table

Name Fees
Earned
 Share-
Based
Awards
 Option-Based
Awards(1)(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 Pension
Value
 All Other
Compensation
 Total(3)

  (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$) (C$)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Leanne M. Baker 125,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 224,817

Douglas R. Beaumont 125,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 224,817

Clifford J. Davis 115,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 214,817

Bernard Kraft 115,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 214,817

Mel Leiderman 140,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 239,817

James D. Nasso 240,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 339,817

John Merfyn Roberts 115,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 214,817

Howard R. Stockford 125,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 224,817

Pertti Voutilainen 115,000 n/a 99,817 n/a n/a n/a 214,817

(1)
For a discussion of the key assumptions underlying the value of the option-based awards see Note 1 to the "Summary Compensation Table".

(2)
Option-based awards given to non-executive directors will be limited to the lesser of: (a) 1% of the outstanding shares at any given point in time; and (b) an annual equity award value of C$100,000.

(3)
Presented in Canadian dollars. On December 31, 2010 the Noon Buying Rate was C$1.00 equals US$0.9946.

The following table sets out the value vested during the most recently completed financial year of the Company of incentive plan awards granted to the directors of the Company, other than Messrs. Boyd and Scherkus.Mr. Boyd.


Incentive Plan Awards Table – Value Vested During Fiscal Year 20102012

Name Options-Based Option-Based
Awards –
Value Vested
During the Year
 Share-Based
Awards –
Value Vested
During the Year
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
CompensationCompensations –
Value Earned
During the Year

  (C$) (C$) (C$)







 
Leanne M. Baker 115,6494,520(1)niln/a n/a

Douglas R. Beaumont 105,659nilnil n/a 

Martine A. Celejnilniln/a

Clifford J. Davis 81,901143,064nil n/a 

Robert Gemmellnilniln/a

Bernard Kraft 39,659nilnil n/a n/a

Mel Leiderman 39,659nilnil n/a n/a

James D. Nasso 71,384nilnil n/a 

Sean Rileynilniln/a

John Merfyn Roberts 81,901143,064nil n/a n/a

Howard R. Stockford 39,659nilnil n/a n/a

Pertti Voutilainen 105,659nilnil n/a n/a

(1)
Value of Dr. Baker's awards are in United States dollars.

122140            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The following table sets out the outstanding optionOption awards and RSUs of the directors of the Company, other than Messrs.Mr. Boyd, and Scherkus, as at December 31, 2010.2012.


Outstanding Incentive Plan Awards Table – 2012

 Option-Based Awards Share-Based Awards Option-Based Awards Share-Based Awards
 
 
 
 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
 Option
Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Value of
Unexercised
In-The-Money
Options(1)
 Number of
Shares or
Units of Shares
that have
not Vested
 Market or
Payout
Value of
Share-Based
Awards
that have
not Vested
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
 Option
Exercise
Price
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Value of
Unexercised
In-The-Money
Options(1)
 Number of
Shares or Units
of Shares that
have not Vested
 Market or
Payout Value of
Share-Based
Awards that
have not Vested(1)
 

 (#) (C$)   (C$) (#) (C$)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 (#) (C$)   (C$) (#) (C$) 
Leanne M. Baker 5,000 41.24(2)1/2/2012 177,300(2)nil nil 35,000 54.63(2)1/2/2013 4,520(2)3,000 156,390(2) 
 35,000 54.63(2)1/2/2013 772,450(2)    4,000 51.33(2)1/4/2014       
 4,000 51.33(2)1/4/2014 101,480(2)    6,120 54.00(2)1/2/2015       
 6,120 54.00(2)1/2/2015 138,924(2)    5,824 76.70(2)1/4/2016       

Douglas R. Beaumont 25,000 48.09 1/2/2012 712,750 nil nil 35,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 1,000 52,130 
 35,000 54.42 1/2/2013 776,300     4,000 62.77 1/2/2014       
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     6,120 56.92 1/2/2015       
 6,120 56.92 1/2/2015 120,442     5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       

Martine A. Celej 4,721 70.26 2/21/2016 nil 3,000 156,390 


Clifford J. Davis 1,800 33.26 11/3/2013 78,012 nil nil 1,800 33.26 11/3/2013 143,064 3,000 156,390 
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     4,000 62.77 1/2/2014       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       
 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       


Robert Gemmell 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016 nil 3,000 156,390 

Bernard Kraft 8,750 54.42 1/2/2013 194,075 nil nil 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil 1,000 52,130 
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       

Mel Leiderman 30,000 54.42 1/2/2013 665,400 nil nil 7,500 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 3,000 156,390 
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     4,000 62.77 1/2/2014       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       


 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       


James D. Nasso 53,000 54.42 1/2/2013 1,175,540 nil nil 53,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 4,000 208,520 
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     4,000 62.77 1/2/2014       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       


 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       


Sean Riley 5,824 76.60 1/1/2016 nil 3,000 156,390 


John Merfyn Roberts 7,200 33.26 11/3/2013 312,048 nil nil 7,200 33.26 11/3/2013 143,064 3,000 156,390 
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014       
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       

Howard R. Stockford 28,750 54.42 1/2/2013 637,675 nil nil 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 nil 3,000 156,390 
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       

Pertti Voutilainen 15,000 48.09 1/2/2012 427,650 nil nil 35,000 54.42 1/2/2013 nil 1,000 52,130 
 35,000 54.42 1/2/2013 776,300     4,000 62.77 1/2/2014       
 4,000 62.77 1/2/2014 55,320     6,120 56.92 1/4/2015       
 6,120 56.92 1/4/2015 120,442     5,824 76.60 1/4/2016       

Notes:

(1)
Based on a closing price of the Company's shares on the TSX of C$76.6052.13 on December 31, 2010.2012.

(2)
ValueThe value of Dr. Baker's awards is in United States dollars and based on a closing price of the Company's shares on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")NYSE of US$76.70$52.46 on December 31, 2010.2012.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            141

Table of Contents


In 2009, shareholders of Agnico-Eaglethe Company approved an amendment to the Employee Share Purchase Plan to prohibit participation by non-executive directors, formalizing a practice that had been adopted in April 2008 at the time of certain

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            123

Table of Contents



undertakings given to RiskMetrics Group.directors. During the year ended December 31, 2010, Agnico-Eagle2012, the Company issued a total of 3,5681,830 common shares to the followingMr. Boyd (the only executive directorsdirector) under its Employee Share Purchase Plan as follows:Plan.


Mr. Boyd2,082

Mr. Scherkus1,486

The following table sets out the attendance of each of the directors to the Board of Directors meetings and the Board Committee meetings held in 2010.2012.

Director Board Meetings
Attended
 Committee Meetings
Attended

Leanne M. Baker 98 of 98 105 of 105

Douglas R. Beaumont 98 of 98 910 of 910

Sean Boyd 98 of 98 N/A

Martine A. Celej8 of 85 of 5

Clifford J. Davis 98 of 99 of 9

David Garofalo(1)8 5 of 5 
N/A
Robert Gemmell6 of 85 of 5

Bernard Kraft 97 of 98 9 of 9

Mel Leiderman 98 of 98 105 of 105

James D. Nasso 98 of 98 136 of 136

John Merfyn Roberts 98 of 99 of 9

Eberhard Scherkus9 of 98 4 of 4

Sean Riley7 of 84 of 5

Howard R. Stockford 98 of 98 910 of 910

Pertti Voutilainen 98 of 98 84 of 84

(1)
Mr. Garofalo resigned from the Board of Directors on July 9, 2010.

Indebtedness of Directors, Executive Officers and Senior Officers

There is no outstanding indebtedness to Agnico-Eaglethe Company by any of its officers or directors. The Company's policy is not to make any loans to directors or officers. Agnico-Eagle does not make loans to its directors and officers under any circumstances.

Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance

The Company has purchased, at its expense, directors' and officers' liability insurance policies to provide insurance against possible liabilities incurred by its directors and officers in their capacity as directors and officers of the Company. The premium for these policies for the period from December 31, 20102012 to December 31, 20112013 is C$699,500.1,059,359. The policies provide coverage of up to C$100150 million per occurrence to a maximum of C$100150 million per annum. There is no deductible for directors and officers and a C$250,0002,500,000 deductible for each claim made by the Company (C$1 million deductible for securities claims). The insurance applies in circumstances where the Company may not indemnify its directors and officers for their acts or omissions.

Board Practices

The Board and management have been following the developments in corporate governance requirements and best practices standards in both Canada and the United States. As these requirements and practices have evolved, the Company has responded in a positive and proactive way by assessing its practices against these requirements and modifying, or targeting for modification, practices to bring them into compliance with these corporate governance requirements and best practices standards. The Company revises, from time to time, the Board Mandate and the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Health, Safety, and

124            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Environment and Sustainable Development Committee (formerly the Health, Safety and Environment Committee) to reflect the new and evolving corporate governance requirements and what it believes to be best practices standards in Canada and the United States.

142            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The Board believes that effective corporate governance contributes to improved corporate performance and enhanced shareholder value. The Company's governance practices reflect the Board's assessment of the governance structure and process which can best serve to realize these objectives in the Company's particular circumstance. The Company's governance practices are subject to review and evaluation through the Board's Corporate Governance Committee to ensure that, as the Company's business evolves, changes in structure and process necessary to ensure continued good governance are identified and implemented.

The Company is required under the rules of the CSA to disclose its corporate governance practices and provide a description of the Company's system of corporate governance. This Statement of Corporate Governance Practices has been prepared by the Board's Corporate Governance Committee and approved by the Board.

Additional information on each director standing for election, including other public company boards on which they serve and their attendance record for all Board and Committee meetings during 2010, can be found under "– Directors and Senior Management" and "– Compensation of Directors and Other Information".

Director Independence

The Board consists of fourteenthirteen directors. The Board has made an affirmative determination that twelve of its fourteenthirteen current members are "independent" within the meaning of the CSA rules and the standards of the New York Stock Exchange.NYSE. With the exception of Messrs.Mr. Boyd, and Scherkus, all directors are independent of management and free from any interest andor any business whichthat could materially interfere with their ability to act as a director with a view to the best interests of the Company. In reaching this determination, the Board considered the circumstances and relationships with the Company and its affiliates of each of its directors. In determining that all directors except Messrs.Mr. Boyd and Scherkus are independent, the Board took into consideration the factfacts that none of the remaining directors is an officer or employee of the Company or party to any material contract with the Company and that none receives remuneration from the Company other than directors' fees and optionOption grants for service on the Board. Messrs.Mr. Boyd and Scherkus areis considered related because they are officershe is an officer of the Company. All directors, other than Messrs.Mr. Boyd, and Scherkus, also meet the independence standard as set out in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX").SOX.

The Board regularly meetsmay meet independently of management at the request of any director or may excuse members of management from all or a portion of any meeting where a potential conflict of interest arises or where otherwise appropriate. The Board is scheduled to meetalso meets without management before or after each Board meeting. In addition,meeting, including after each Board meeting held to consider interim and annual financial statements, the Board meets without management.statements. In 2010,2012, the Board met without management at each Board meeting, being nineeight separate occasions, including the four regularly scheduled quarterly meetings.

To promote the exercise of independent judgment by directors in considering transactions and agreements, any director or officer who has a material interest in the matter being considered wouldmay not be present for discussions relating to the matter and any such director may not participate in any vote on the matter.

Chairman

Mr. Nasso is the Chairman of the Board and Mr. Boyd is the Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Nasso is not a member of management. The Board believes that the separation of the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer enhances the ability of the Board to function independently of management and does not foresee that the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be held by the same person.

The Board has adopted a position description for the Chairman of the Board. The Chairman's role is to provide leadership to directors in discharging their duties and obligations as set out in the mandate of the Board. The specific responsibilities of the Chairman include providing advice, counsel and mentorship to the Chief Executive Officer, appointing the Chair of each of the Board's committees and promoting the delivery of information to the members of the Board on a timely basis to keep them fully apprised of all matters which are material to them at all times. The Chairman's responsibilities also include scheduling, overseeing and presiding over meetings of the Board and presiding over meetings of the Company's shareholders.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            125

Table of Contents


Board Mandate

The Board's mandate is to provide stewardship of the Company, to oversee the management of the Company's business and affairs, to maintain its strength and integrity, to oversee the Company's strategic direction, its organization structure and succession planning of senior management and to perform any other duties required by law. The Board's strategic planning process consists of an annual review of the Company's five-yearfuture business planplans and, from time to time (at(and at least annually), a meeting focused on strategic planning matters. As part of this process, the Board reviews and approves the corporate objectives proposed by the Chief Executive Officer and advises management on the development of a corporate strategy to achieve those objectives. The Board also reviews the principal risks inherent in the Company's business, including environmental, industrial and financial risks, and assesses the systems to manage these risks. The Board also

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            143

Table of Contents



monitors the performance of senior management against the business plan through a periodic review process (at least every quarter) and reviews and approves promotion and succession matters.

The Board holds management responsible for the development of long-term strategies for the Company. The role of the Board is to review, question, validate and ultimately approve the strategies and policies proposed by management. The Board relies on management to perform the data gathering, analysis and reporting functions which are critical to the Board for effective corporate governance. In addition, the Vice-Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer, the President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer, the Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, the Senior Vice-President, Corporate Development, the Senior Vice-President, Exploration and the Senior Vice-President, Technical Services report to the Board at least every quarter on the Company's progress in the preceding quarter and on the strategic, operational and financial issues facing the Company.

Management is authorized to act, without Board approval, on all ordinary course matters relating to the Company's business. Management seeks the Board's prior approval for significant changes in the Company's affairs such as major capital expenditures, financing arrangements and significant acquisitions and divestitures. Board approval is required for any venture outside of the Company's existing businesses and for any change in senior management. Recommendations of committees of the Board require the approval of the full Board before being implemented. In addition, the Board oversees and reviews significant corporate plans and initiatives, including the annual five-yearthree-year business plan and budget and significant matters of corporate strategy or policy. The Company's authorization policy and risk management policy ensure compliance with good corporate governance practices. Both policies formalize controls over the management or other employees of the Company by stipulating internal approval processes for transactions, investments, commitments and expenditures and, in the case of the risk management policy, establishing objectives and guidelines for metal price hedging, foreign exchange and short-term investment risk management and insurance. The Board, directly and through its Audit Committee, also assesses the integrity of the Company's internal control and management information systems.

The Board oversees the Company's approach to communications with shareholders and other stakeholders and approves specific communications initiatives from time to time. The Company conducts an active investor relations program. The program involves responding to shareholder inquiries, briefing analysts and fund managers with respect to reported financial results and other announcements by the Company and meeting with individual investors and other stakeholders. Senior management reports regularly to the Board on these matters. The Board reviews and approves the Company's major communications with shareholders and the public, including quarterly and annual financial results, the annual report and the management information circular. The Board has approved a Disclosure Policy which establishes standards and procedures relating to contacts with analysts and investors, news releases, conference calls, disclosure of material information, trading restrictions and blackout periods.

The Board's mandate is posted on the Company's website atwww.agnico-eagle.com.

Position Descriptions

Chief Executive Officer

The Board has adopted a position description for the Chief Executive Officer, who has full responsibility for the day-to-day operation of the Company's business in accordance with the Company's strategic plan and current year operating and capital expenditure budgets as approved by the Board. In discharging his responsibility for the day-to-day operation of Agnico-Eagle'sthe Company's business, subject to the oversight by the Board, the Chief Executive Officer's specific responsibilities include:

126            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


144            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The Chief Executive Officer is to consult with the Chairman on matters of strategic significance to the Company and alert the Chairman on a timely basis of any material changes or events that may impact upon the risk profile, financial affairs or performance of the Company.

Chairs of Board Committees

The Board has adopted written position descriptions for each of the Chairs of the Board's committees, which include the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Health, Safety, Environment and EnvironmentSustainable Development Committee. The role of each of the Chairs is to ensure the effective functioning of his or her committee and provide leadership to its members in discharging the mandate as set out in the committee's charter. The responsibilities of each Chair include, among others:

Each of the Chairs is also responsible for carrying out other duties as requested by the Board, depending on need and circumstances.

Orientation and Continuing Education

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of orientation programs for new directors and continuing education for all directors.

The Company maintains a collection of director orientation materials, which include the Board Mandate, the charters of the Board's committees, a memorandum on the duties of a director of a public company and a glossary of mining and accounting terms. A copy of such materials is given to each director and updated annually.

The Company holds periodic educational sessions with its directors and legal counsel to review and assess the Board's corporate governance policies. This allows new directors to become familiar with the corporate governance policies of the Company as they relate to its business. In addition, the Company provides extensive reports on all operations to the directors at each quarterly Board meeting and conducts yearly site tours for the directors at a different mine site each year.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            127

Table of Contents


The Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual assessment that addresses the performance of the Board, the Board's committees and the individual directors. These assessments help identify opportunities for continuing Board and director development. In addition, it is open to any director to take a continuing education course related to the skill and knowledge necessary to meet his or her obligations as a director at the expense of the Company.

Ethical Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which provides a framework for directors, officers and employees on the conduct and ethical decision-makingdecision making integral to their work. In addition, the Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Consultants and Contractors. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            145

Table of Contents



compliance with these codes of ethics and any waivers or amendments thereto can only be made by the Board or a Board committee. These codes are available onwww.sedar.com.

The Board has also adopted a Confidential Anonymous Complaint Reporting Policy, which provides procedures for officers and employees who believe that a violation of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics has occurred to report this violation on a confidential and anonymous basis. Complaints can be made internally to the General Counsel, Senior Vice-President, Legal and Corporate Secretary or the Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Complaints can also be made anonymously by telephone, e-mail or postal letter through a hotline provided by an independent third party service provider. The General Counsel, Senior Vice-President, Legal and Corporate Secretary periodically prepares a written report to the Audit Committee regarding the complaints, if any, received through these procedures.

The Board believes that providing a procedure for employees and officers to raise concerns about ethical conduct on an anonymous and confidential basis fosters a culture of ethical conduct within the Company.

Nomination of Directors

The Corporate Governance Committee, which is comprised entirely of independent directors, is responsible for participating in the recruitment and recommendation of new nominees for appointment or election to the Board. When considering a potential candidate, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the qualities and skills that the Board, as a whole, should have and assesses the competencies and skills of the current members of the Board. Based on the talent already represented on the Board, the Corporate Governance Committee then identifies the specific skills, personal qualities or experiences that a candidate should possess in light of the opportunities and risks facing the Company. The Corporate Governance Committee maintainsmay maintain a list of potential director candidates for its future consideration and may engage outside advisors to assist in identifying potential candidates. Potential candidates are screened to ensure that they possess the requisite qualities, including integrity, business judgment and experience, business or professional expertise, independence from management, international experience, financial literacy, excellent communications skills and the ability to work well in a team situation. The Corporate Governance Committee also considers the existing commitments of a potential candidate to ensure that such candidate will be able to fulfill his or her duties as a Board member.

Compensation

Remuneration is paid to the Company's directors based on several factors, including time commitments, risk, workload and responsibility demanded by their positions. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews and fixes the amount and composition of the compensation of directors. For a summary of remuneration paid to directors, please see "– Compensation"Compensation of Directors and Other Information" above and the description of the Compensation Committee below.

Board Committees

The Board has four Committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Health, Safety, Environment and EnvironmentSustainable Development Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is composed entirely of directors who are unrelated to and independent from the Company (currently, Dr. Baker (Chair), Mr. Kraft, Mr. Leiderman and Dr. Riley), each of whom is financially literate, as the term is used in the CSA's Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees. In addition, Mr. Leiderman and Mr. Kraft are Chartered Accountants; Mr. Leiderman is currently in private practice and Mr. Kraft while retired, remains active in the profession and the Board has determined that both of them qualify as audit committee financial experts, as the term is defined in the rules of the SEC. The education and experience of each member of the Audit Committee is set out under "Directors and Senior Management" above. Fees paid to the Company's auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, are set out under "Item 16C Principal Accountant Fees and Services". The Audit Committee met five times in 2012.

The Audit Committee has two primary objectives. The first is to advise the Board of Directors in its oversight responsibilities regarding:

128146            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


The second primary objective of the Audit Committee is to prepare the reports required to be included in management information circulars of the management proxy circularCompany in accordance with applicable laws or the rules of applicable securities regulatory authorities.

The Board has adopted an Audit Committee charter, which provides that each member of the Audit Committee must be unrelated to and independent from the Company as determined by the Board in accordance with the applicable requirements of the laws governing the Company, the applicable stock exchanges on which the Company's securities are listed and applicable securities regulatory authorities. In addition, each member must be financially literate and at least one member of the Audit Committee must be an audit committee financial expert, as the term is defined in the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the external auditors to the Company.

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing all financial statements prior to approval by the Board, all other disclosuresdisclosure containing financial information and all management reports which accompany any financial statements. The Audit Committee is also responsible for all internal and external audit plans, any recommendation affecting the Company's internal controls, the results of internal and external audits and any changes in accounting practices or policies. The Audit Committee reviews any accruals, provisions, estimates or related party transactions that have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements and any litigation, claim or other contingency that could have a material effect upon the Company's financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for assessing management's programs and policies relating to the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls over the Company's accounting and financial systems. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer the procedures undertaken in connection with their certifications for annual filings in accordance with the requirements of applicable securities regulatory authorities. The Audit Committee is also responsible for recommending to the Board the external auditor to be nominated for shareholder approval who will be responsible for preparing audited financial statements and completing other audit, review or attest services. The Audit Committee also recommends to the Board the compensation to be paid to the external auditor and directly oversees its work. The Company's external auditor reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reports directly to the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee is entitled to retain (at the Company's expense) and determine the compensation of any independent counsel, accountants or other advisors to assist the Audit Committee in its oversight responsibilities.

Compensation Committee

The AuditCompensation Committee is composed entirely of directors who are unrelated to and independent from the Company (currently, Mr. LeidermanGemmell (Chair), Dr. Baker, Mr. Kraft, Mr. NassoBeaumont, Ms Celej and Mr. Roberts), each of whom is financially literate, as the term is used in the CSA's Multilateral Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees. In addition, Messrs. Leiderman and Kraft are Chartered Accountants; Mr. Leiderman is currently in private practice and Mr. Kraft, while retired, remains active in the profession and the Board has determined that both of them qualify as audit committee financial experts, as the term is defined in the rules of the SEC. The education and experience of each member of the Audit Committee is set out under "– Directors and Senior Management". Fees paid to the Company's auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, are set out under "Item 10 Additional Information – Audit Fees"Stockford). The AuditCompensation Committee met five times in 2010.

Compensation Committee2012.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            129

Table of Contents


2012 ANNUAL REPORT            147

Table of Contents


The Compensation Committee reports directly to the Board. The charter of the Compensation Committee provides that each member of the Compensation Committee must be unrelated and independent.

The Board considers Messrs. Gemmell and Beaumont particularly well-qualified to serve on the Compensation Committee given the expertise they have accrued during their business careers: Mr. Gemmell as a senior manager of divisions of a major financial services company (where part of his duties included assessing personnel and setting compensation rates) and Mr. Beaumont as a founder and former senior executive of an international engineering services company (where part of his duties included oversight of the establishment of appropriate compensation structures for the organization).

Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporate Governance Committee is composed entirely of directors who are unrelated to and independent from the Company (currently, Dr. BakerMr. Roberts (Chair), Mr. Beaumont,Kraft, Mr. Davis, Mr. LeidermanNasso and Mr. Stockford)Voutilainen). The Compensation Committee met five times in 2010.

Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2012.

The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

The Corporate Governance Committee also provides a forum for a discussion of matters not readily discussed in a full Board meeting. The charter of the Corporate Governance Committee provides that each member of the Corporate Governance Committee must be independent, as such term is defined in the CSA rules.

Health, Safety, Environment and Sustainable Development Committee

The Corporate GovernanceHealth, Safety, Environment and Sustainable Development Committee (formerly the Health, Safety and Environment Committee) is composed entirelycomprised of four directors who are unrelated to and independent from the Company (currently Mr. BeaumontDavis (Chair), Mr. Kraft,Beaumont, Mr. Nasso Mr. Roberts and Mr. Voutilainen)Stockford). The Corporate GovernanceHealth, Safety, Environment and Sustainable Development Committee met fourfive times in 2010.

Health, Safety and Environment Committee2012.

The Health, Safety, Environment and EnvironmentSustainable Development Committee is responsible for, among other things:

The Health, Safety, Environment and EnvironmentSustainable Development Committee reports directly to the Board and provides a forum to review sustainable development, health, safety and environmental issues in a more thorough and detailed manner than could be adopted by the full Board. The Health, Safety, Environment and EnvironmentSustainable Development Committee charter provides that a majority of the members of the Committee must be unrelated and independent.

The Health, Safety and Environment Committee is comprised of four directors who are unrelated to and independent from the Company (currently Mr. Stockford (Chair), Mr. Davis, Mr. Nasso and Mr. Voutilainen) and one non-independent director (Mr. Scherkus, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company). The Health, Safety and Environment Committee met four times in 2010.

Assessment of Directors

The Company's Corporate Governance Committee (see description of the Corporate Governance Committee above) is responsible for the assessment of the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and participates in the recruitment and recommendation of new nominees for appointment or election to the Board of Directors.

148            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Each of the directors participates in a detailed annual assessment of the Board and Board Committees.committees. The assessment addresses performance of the Board, each Board committee and individual directors, including through a peer to peer evaluation. A broad range of topics is covered such as Board and Board committee structure and composition, succession

130            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



planning, risk management, director competencies and Board processes and effectiveness. The assessment helps identify opportunities for continuing Board and director development and also forms the basis of continuing Board participation.


Employees

As of December 31, 2010,2012, the Company had 4,7825,723 employees comprised of 3,2434,045 permanent employees, 1,448 contractors, 155 temporary employees and 1,539 contractors of which 73575 students. Of the permanent employees, 819 were employed at the LaRonde mine, 213 at the Lapa mine, 163 at the Goldex 192mine project, 413 at Lapa, 972the Kittila mine, 1,220 at the Pinos Altos 369mine, 108 at Kittila, 15the La India mine project, 678 at the Meadowbank mine (with 672 at Baker Lake and Meadowbank and 6 in Quebec), 21 at the Meliadine project, 25 in the Explorationexploration group in Canada and the U.S., 499 for the Meadowbank Mine with 496 at Baker Lake and Meadowbank and 3 in Quebec, 156221 at the regional technical office in Abitibi and 94116 at the corporate head office in Toronto. The number of permanent employees of the Company at the end of 2012, 2011 and 2010 2009was 4,045, 3,600 and 2008 was 3,243, 2,781 and 1,917, respectively.


Share Ownership

In order to align the interests of the Company and those of its officers and employees, the Company encourages ownership of common shares and facilitates this through its RSU Plan, Stock Option Plan and Employee Share Purchase Plan. The Company has also adopted executive share ownership policies: the Chief Executive Officer is required to own the equivalent of at least three years of his base salary in common shares or RSUs of the Company. Mr. Boyd, the current Chief Executive Officer of the Company, meets this share ownership value requirement. A new Chief Executive Officer would have three years after being appointed to that position to comply with this provision. Senior Vice-Presidents of the Company are required to have or own 30,000 common shares or RSUs of the Company and Vice-Presidents of the Company are required to have or own 15,000 common shares or RSUs of the Company. Senior Vice-Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Company have the later of five years from the date of implementation of this policy (that is, October 24, 2017) or five years from the date of appointment, to meet this share ownership requirement.

As ofat March 18, 2011,11, 2013, the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Al-Joundi, who resigned as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on July 9, 2012) and directors as a group (17 persons) beneficially owned or controlled (excluding optionsOptions to purchase 2,959,1152,957,615 common shares, of which 1,913,636 are currently exercisable and 1,045,479 are currently unexercisable)shares) an aggregate of 322,266454,897 common shares or about 0.198%approximately 0.26% of the 168,944,915172,501,169 issued and outstanding common shares. See also "– Compensation of Executive Officers".


Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forthout certain information concerning the direct and beneficial ownership by each director and Named Executive Officer of the Company (other than Mr. Al-Joundi, who resigned as Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on July 9, 2012) of common shares of the Company and optionsOptions to purchase common shares of the Company. Unless otherwise noted, exercise prices are in Canadian dollars.

Beneficial Owner Share
Ownership(1)
 Total
Common
Shares
under
Option(2)
 Common
Shares
under
Option
 Exercise
Price
(C$, except
as noted)
 Expiry
Date
 

Leanne M. Baker
Director
 5,500 50,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
35,000
 US$76.70
US$54.00
US$51.33
US$54.63
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
 

Douglas R. Beaumont
Director
 17,960 75,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
35,000
25,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
48.09
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
1/2/2012
 

Sean Boyd
Director, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 113,902 1,090,000 240,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
100,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
48.09
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
1/2/2012
 

Martine A. Celej
Director
 1,000 4,721 4,721 70.26 2/21/2016 

Clifford J. Davis
Director
 6,000 17,744 5,824
6,120
4,000
1,800
 76.60
56.92
62.77
33.26
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
11/3/2013
 

Robert J. Gemmell
Director
 5,000 5,824 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016 

  Share
Ownership(1)
 Total
Common Shares
under Option(2)
 Common Shares
under Option
 Exercise Price
(C$, except
as noted)
 Expiry Date 

Leanne M. Baker
Director
 11,500 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 US$76.70
US$54.00
US$51.33
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Douglas R. Beaumont
Director
 19,960 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

20102012 ANNUAL REPORT            131149

Table of Contents


Sean Boyd
Director, Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 165,802 952,500 162,500
240,000
300,000
250,000
 37.05
76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/3/2017
1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 


Martine A. Celej
Director
 8,000 4,721 4,721 70.26 2/21/2016 


Clifford J. Davis
Director
 12,000 17,744 5,824
6,120
4,000
1,800
 76.60
56.92
62.77
33.26
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
11/3/2013
 


Robert J. Gemmell
Director
 16,000 5,824 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016 


Bernard Kraft
Director
 12,657 24,694 5,824
6,120
4,000
8,750
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
  14,657 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Mel Leiderman
Director
 5,500 45,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
30,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
  12,000 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

James D. Nasso
Director and Chairman of the Board
 18,289 68,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
53,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/3/2013
  23,289 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Sean Riley
Director
 1,000 5,824 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016  8,000 5,824 5,824 76.60 1/4/2016 

J. Merfyn Roberts
Director
 6,000 23,144 5,824
6,120
4,000
7,200
 76.60
56.92
62.77
33.26
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
11/3/2013
  12,000 23,144 5,824
6,120
4,000
7,200
 76.60
56.92
62.77
33.26
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
11/3/2013
 

Eberhard Scherkus
Director, President and
Chief Operating Officer
 71,229 690,000 140,000
175,000
175,000
125,000
75,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
48.09
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
1/2/2012
 

Howard R. Stockford
Director
 6,068 44,694 5,824
6,120
4,000
28,750
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
  11,068 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Pertti Voutilainen
Director
 12,000 65,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
35,000
15,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
48.09
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
1/2/2012
  16,800 15,944 5,824
6,120
4,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Ammar Al-Joundi
Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 10,839 135,000 60,000
75,000
 76.60
69.44
 1/4/2016
9/1/2015
 
David Smith(3)
Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
 32,975 365,000 100,000
75,000
60,000
65,000
65,000
 52.13
37.05
76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/3/2018
1/3/2017
1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Alain Blackburn
Senior Vice-President, Exploration
 153 299,750 60,000
100,000
100,000
39,750
 76.60
56.92
62.77
54.42
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
1/2/2013
 

Jean Robitaille
Senior Vice-President, Technical Services
 29,169 310,000 60,000
75,000
75,000
10,000
50,000
40,000
 76.60
56.92
62.77
66.74
54.42
48.09
 1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
6/26/2013
1/2/2013
1/2/2012
 

150            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Alain Blackburn
Senior Vice-President, Exploration
 24,449 410,000 75,000
75,000
60,000
100,000
100,000
 52.13
37.05
76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/3/2018
1/3/2017
1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Donald G. Allan
Senior Vice-President, Corporate Development
 32,911 341,250 56,250
60,000
75,000
75,000
 37.05
76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/3/2017
1/2/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

R. Gregory Laing
General Counsel, Senior Vice-President, Legal and Corporate Secretary
 33,486 360,000 75,000
75,000
60,000
75,000
75,000
 52.13
37.05
76.60
56.92
62.77
 1/3/2018
1/3/2017
1/4/2016
1/4/2015
1/2/2014
 

Notes:

(1)
As ofat March 18, 2011.11, 2013. In each case, shareholdings (which includes common shares and RSUs) constitute less than one percent of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. The total number of common shares and RSUs held by directors and named executive officers constitutes less than 0.198%approximately 0.26% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company.Company as at March 11, 2013.

(2)
As at March 11, 2013.

(3)
Mr. Smith became Senior Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer on October 24, 2012; prior to that, he was the Senior Vice-President, Investor Relations and Strategic Planning of March 18, 2011.the Company.

132            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


ITEM 7   MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

To the knowledge of the directors and senior officers of the Company, as ofat March 18, 2011,11, 2013, no person or corporation beneficially owns or exercises control or direction over common shares of the Company carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all common shares of the Company other than as set out below:

 
 
Major Shareholder Number of
common shares
 Percentage of
outstanding
common shares
 Number of
common shares
 Percentage of
outstanding
common shares
 

BlackRock, Inc.(1) 20,005,396 11.63% 


 

 

 

 

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(1) 10,062,745 5.9%

BlackRock, Inc.(2) 16,344,847 9.69%
First Eagle Investment Management, LLC(2) 10,609,234 6.17% 

FMR LLC(3) 11,196,992 6.67% 10,934,362 6.36% 



Van Eck Associates Corporation(4) 11,253,461 6.59% 


Notes:

(1)
According to reports filed with applicable securities regulators on February 12, 2010dated January 6, 2012, May 7, 2012, October 9, 2012 and February 10, 2011, the percentage ownership of common shares of the Company held by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. has varied from 5.4% to 5.9%, respectively.

(2)
According to reports filed with applicable securities regulators on January 20, 2010, October 8, 2010, January 7, 2011 and February 7, 2011,9, 2013, the percentage ownership of common shares of the Company held by BlackRock, Inc. has varied from 8.7% to 10.16% to 10.31% to 9.69%9.93% to 11.85% to 11.63%, respectively.

(3)(2)
FMR LLC and FIL Limited (collectively, "Fidelity") filedAccording to a report filed with applicable securities regulators ondated February 14, 2011 stating that, while they are of the view that they are not acting as a "group" for the purposes of Section 13(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, they have11, 2013.

(3)
According to reports filed the report on a voluntary basis as if all of the shares are beneficially owned by them on a joint basis. Previously, FMR LLC filed reports with applicable securities regulators on September 9, 2008,dated February 13, 20092012 and February 16, 2010 stating that Fidelity had control over 10.92%, 7.63% and 7.2%, respectively,13, 2013, the percentage ownership of the common shares of the Company.Company held by FMR LLC has varied from 4.18% to 6.36%, respectively.

(4)
According to a report filed with applicable securities regulators dated February 14, 2012.

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            151

Table of Contents


None of the Company's major shareholders have different voting rights than other holders of the Company's common shares.

As ofat March 18, 2011,11, 2013, there were 3,6923,668 holders of record of Agnico-Eagle's 168,944,915172,501,169 outstanding common shares, of which 548672 holders of record were in Canada and held 120,493,87594,234,198 common shares or about 71.32%approximately 54.63% of the outstanding common shares.

The Company is not aware of any arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company. To the knowledge of the Company, it is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any government or by any natural or legal person severally or jointly.


Related Party Transactions

The Company has not entered into any material related party transactions since January 1, 2010.2012.

ITEM 8   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The consolidated financial statements furnished pursuant to Item 18 are presented in accordance with US GAAP.

During the period under review, inflation has not had a significant impact on the Company's operations.

The Company is not aware of any legal or arbitration proceedings which may have, or have had in the recent past, a significant effect on the Company's financial position or profitability.


Dividend Policy

The Company's current policy is to pay annualquarterly dividends on its common shares and, on December 15, 2010,12, 2012, the Company announced that it had declared an annuala quarterly dividend of $0.64$0.22 per common share, to be paid quarterly with the first quarterly payment of $0.16 per share, payable on March 15, 2011.2013. In 2012, the dividend paid was $0.80 per common share (quarterly payments of $0.20 per common share). In 2011, the dividend paid was $0.64 per common share (quarterly payments of $0.16 per common share). In each of 2010, 2009 and 2008, the dividend paid was $0.18 per common share, inshare. In 2007, the dividend paid was $0.12 per common share and, fromshare. From 2003 to 2006, the dividend paid was $0.03 per common share. Although the Company expects to continue paying an annuala cash dividend, future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board and will be subject to factors such factors as the Company's earnings, financial condition and capital requirements. The Company's bank credit facility contains covenantsa covenant that restrictrestricts the

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            133

Table of Contents



Company's ability to declare or pay dividends if acertain events of default under the bank credit facility hashave occurred or would result from the declaration or paymentand are continuing.

152            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of the dividend.Contents



ITEM 9   THE OFFER AND LISTING

Market and Listing Details

Common Shares

The Company's common shares are listed and traded in Canada on the TSX and in the United States on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE").NYSE.

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices and the average daily trading volume for Agnico-Eagle's common shares on the TSX and the NYSE for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended December 31, 20102012 and for each quarter during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2010.2012.

 TSX (C$) NYSE ($) TSX NYSE
 
 
 
 
 High Low Average Daily
Volume
 High Low Average Daily
Volume
 High (C$) Low (C$) Average Daily
Volume
 High ($) Low ($) Average Daily
Volume
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2006 52.03 23.31 911,132 45.67 19.94 2,006,680

2007 55.86 35.70 913,173 59.45 33.25 2,076,082


 
2008 82.80 26.60 1,184,654 83.45 20.87 3,842,836 82.80 26.60 1,184,654 83.45 20.87 3,842,836 

2009 77.32 50.80 979,369 74.00 42.65 4,172,474 77.32 50.80 979,369 74.00 42.65 4,172,474 

2010 88.52 53.16 750,312 88.20 49.64 2,508,059 88.52 53.16 750,312 88.20 49.64 2,508,059 

2009            
2011 75.39 35.35 856,906 77.00 34.50 2,285,842 


2012 56.99 31.50 831,029 57.35 31.42 2,027,502 


2011             

First Quarter 73.64 55.03 1,249,427 59.19 44.12 5,523,872 75.39 62.93 781,613 77.00 63.53 2,534,857 

Second Quarter 73.71 50.80 944,884 63.29 42.65 3,534,497 66.17 58.82 733,270 70.00 59.78 2,059,362 

Third Quarter 77.32 55.09 748,628 72.32 47.31 3,387,937 72.51 53.05 952,868 73.09 54.19 2,297,630 

Fourth Quarter 76.65 55.52 926,079 74.00 51.38 4,138,909 64.14 35.35 960,318 61.17 34.50 2,255,181 

2010            
2012             

First Quarter 64.12 53.16 2,956,480 61.80 49.64 718,042 39.68 31.50 883,359 39.64 31.42 2,238,021 

Second Quarter 68.16 57.05 2,870,655 66.80 55.43 837,814 43.98 31.91 1,003,353 43.22 31.92 2,474,042 

Third Quarter 73.41 56.08 2,081,771 71.33 54.12 759,806 51.80 36.38 813,838 53.12 35.77 1,920,788 

Fourth Quarter 88.52 70.00 2,151,791 88.20 67.66 698,995 56.99 49.25 623,292 57.35 49.81 1,471,676 

134            2012 ANNUAL REPORTAGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED            153

Table of Contents


The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices and the average daily trading volume for the Company's common shares on the TSX and the NYSE since January 1, 2010.2012.

 TSX (C$) NYSE ($) TSX NYSE
 
 
 
 
 High Low Average Daily
Volume
 High Low Average Daily
Volume
 High (C$) Low (C$) Average Daily
Volume
 High ($) Low ($) Average Daily
Volume
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2010            
2012             

January 63.10 54.05 730,988 61.15 50.61 3,060,320 39.68 34.51 712,447 39.64 34.03 1,810,332 

February 64.12 53.16 731,546 61.53 49.64 3,391,420 38.03 31.50 1,159,669 38.14 31.42 2,673,438 

March 63.45 55.41 695,673 61.80 54.07 2,511,403 36.64 32.22 795,312 37.24 32.30 2,230,996 

April 66.60 57.05 876,604 66.05 56.46 2,650,362 39.66 31.91 919,017 40.18 31.92 2,291,627 

May 68.16 59.28 906,730 66.80 55.44 3,830,699 41.50 34.07 964,473 40.37 33.74 2,693,235 

June 66.98 60.40 739,786 65.37 57.22 2,208,167 43.98 39.46 1,124,404 43.22 38.10 2,418,142 

July 62.34 56.08 757,084 60.42 54.12 2,103,229 44.88 36.38 856,104 44.70 35.77 1,956,779 

August 70.76 56.84 793,762 66.40 54.75 2,006,524 47.75 42.55 635,613 48.44 42.45 1,757,900 

September 73.41 65.70 728,616 71.33 63.62 2,139,142 51.80 46.15 973,488 53.12 46.71 2,078,188 

October 79.78 70.00 745,442 78.28 67.66 2,298,960 56.98 49.39 605,285 56.99 50.43 1,362,656 

November 84.25 75.61 656,086 84.21 74.75 2,340,004 56.99 50.70 566,203 57.35 50.45 1,552,130 

December 88.52 75.06 699,910 88.20 73.36 1,831,564 56.18 49.25 710,244 56.50 49.81 1,501,669 

2011            
2013             

January 72.40 66.78 897,886 77.00 66.79 3,091,655 52.97 45.63 582,200 53.78 45.53 1,369,400 

February 75.39 67.07 766,727 76.49 68.36 2,521,990 46.90 39.20 554,355 46.99 38.52 1,297,050 

March (to March 18) 70.96 62.93 727,632 72.91 63.53 2,276,422
March (to March 11) 42.24 38.55 851,594 40.95 37.55 1,739,761 

On March 18, 201111, 2013 the closing price of the common shares was C$65.5540.00 on the TSX and $66.74$38.97 on the NYSE. The registrar and transfer agent for the common shares is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, Toronto, Ontario.

2010154            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Warrants

The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices and the average daily trading volume for Agnico-Eagle's common share purchase warrants (the "Warrants") on the TSX for each of the fiscal years in the period beginning on April 30, 2009 (the date the Warrants were listed for trading on the TSX) and ended December 31, 2012 and for each quarter during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012.

  TSX
  
  High ($) Low ($) Average Daily
Volume
 
  
2009 35.01 16.50 8,482 

2010 43.88 18.03 4,761 

2011 31.48 4.85 9,465 

2012 13.35 3.08 9,196 

2011       

First Quarter 31.48 21.00 11,094 

Second Quarter 25.82 19.25 11,815 

Third Quarter 28.98 15.00 7,904 

Fourth Quarter 20.18 4.85 7,150 

2012       

First Quarter 7.50 3.99 3,553 

Second Quarter 6.53 3.08 14,065 

Third Quarter 11.20 3.50 11,085 

Fourth Quarter 13.35 8.70 7,969 

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            135155

Table of Contents


The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices and average daily trading volume for the Company's common share purchase warrants (the "Warrants")Warrants on the TSX since January 1, 2010.2012.

 TSX ($) TSX
 
 
 High Low Average Daily
Volume
 High ($) Low ($) Average Daily
Volume
 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 
2010      
2012       

January 25.50 18.50 1,957 7.50 5.30 3,194 

February 25.65 18.03 3,336 6.60 4.90 5,750 

March 26.22 21.02 1,442 5.75 3.99 1,714 

April 29.78 22.25 1,685 5.95 3.08 19,089 

May 30.37 22.00 4,500 6.00 3.30 11,893 

June 27.50 23.10 6,332 6.53 4.50 12,035 

July 22.90 19.00 5,439 6.66 3.50 13,468 

August 27.00 20.25 4,236 8.77 6.00 6,970 

September 30.30 25.50 15,691 11.20 8.08 12,998 

October 34.29 27.50 8,262 13.00 9.50 5,482 

November 39.32 32.62 1,738 13.35 9.35 8,837 

December 43.88 32.00 2,045 12.87 8.70 10,114 

2011      
2013       

January 30.15 25.21 5,038 8.00 7.63 6,489 

February 31.48 25.00 9,753 5.60 2.35 11,248 

March (to March 18) 28.10 21.00 7,644
March (to March 11) 2.90 2.15 4,854 

On March 18, 2011,11, 2013, the closing price of the Warrants was $23.35$2.45 on the TSX. The registrar and transfer agent for the Warrants is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, Toronto, Ontario.

ITEM 10   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Memorandum and Articles of IncorporationAmalgamation

Articles of AmendmentAmalgamation

The Company's articles of incorporationamalgamation do not place any restrictions on the Company's objects and purposes. For more information, see the Articlesarticles of Amendmentamalgamation of the Company filed as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form 20-F.

Certain Powers of Directors

TheBusiness Corporations Act (Ontario) (the "OBCA") requires that every director who is a party to, or who is a director or officer of, or has a material interest in, any person who is a party to, a material contract or transaction or a proposed material contract or transaction with the Company, must disclose in writing to the Company or request to have entered in the minutes of the meetings of directors the nature and extent of his or her interest, and must refrain from attending any part of a meeting of directors during which the contract or transaction is discussed and from voting in respect ofon any resolution to approve the contract or transaction unless the contract or transaction is: (a) one relating primarily to his or her remuneration as a director of the corporation or an affiliate; (b) one for indemnity of or insurance for directors as contemplated under the OBCA; or (c) one with an affiliate. However, a director who is prohibited by the OBCA from voting on a material contract or proposed material contract may be counted in determining whether a quorum is present for the purpose of the resolution,

136156            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



purpose of the resolution, if the director disclosed his or her interest in accordance with the OBCA and the contract or transaction was reasonable and fair to the corporation at the time it was approved.

The Company's by-laws provide that the Board will from time to time determine the remuneration to be paid to the directors, which willmay be in addition to the salary paid to any officer or employee of the Company who is also a director. The directors may also, by resolution, award special remuneration to any director for undertaking any special services on the Company's behalf, other than the normal work ordinarily required of a director of the Company. The by-laws provide that confirmation of any such resolution by the Company's shareholders is not required.

The Company's by-laws also provide that the directors may: (a) borrow money upon the credit of the Company; (b) issue, reissue, sell or pledge bonds, debentures, notes or other evidences of indebtedness or guarantee of the Company, whether secured or unsecured; (c) to the extent permitted by the OBCA, give directly or indirectly financial assistance to any person by means of a loan, a guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of any present or future indebtedness, liability or other obligation of any person, or otherwise; and (d) mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a security interest in all or any currently owned or subsequently acquired real or personal, movable or immovable, tangible or intangible property of the Company to secure any such bonds, debentures, notes or other evidences of indebtedness or guarantee or any other present or future indebtedness, liability or other obligation of the Company.

The directors may, by resolution, amend or repeal any by-laws that regulate the business or affairs of the Company. The OBCA requires the directors to submit any such amendment or repeal to the Company's shareholders at the next meeting of shareholders, and the shareholders may confirm, reject or amend the amendment or repeal.

Retirement of Directors

The Board does not have a mandatory retirement policy for directors based solely on age. Due in part to the Company'sBoard's practice of conducting annual Board, Committee and individual director evaluations, the Board approved and adopted a resignation policy primarily based on directors' performance, commitment, skills and experience. As set out in greater detail under "Item 6 Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Board Practices – Assessment of Directors", each director's performance is evaluated annually.

Directors' Share Ownership

Directors, otherTo more closely align the interests of directors with those of shareholders, directors (other than Messrs. Boyd and Scherkus,Mr. Boyd) are required to own a minimum of 10,000 common shares of the equivalent of at least three years of their annual retainer fee in the Company's stock.Company and/or RSUs. Directors have a period of the later of: (i) two years from the date of adoption of this policy (that is, August 24, 2013) or (ii) five years from the date they first became directorsof joining the Board, to achieve this ownership level.level through open market purchases of common shares, grants of RSUs or the exercise of Options held.

Meetings of Shareholders

The OBCA requires the Company to call an annual shareholders' meeting not later than 15 months after holding the last preceding annual meeting and permits the Company to call a special shareholders' meeting at any time. In addition, in accordance with the OBCA, the holders of not less than 5% of the Company's shares carrying the right to vote at a meeting sought to be held may requisition the directors to call a special shareholders' meeting for the purposes stated in the requisition. The Company is required to mail a notice of meeting and management information circular to registered shareholders not less than 21 days and not more than 50 days prior to the date of any annual or special shareholders' meeting. These materials are also filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and furnished to the SEC. The Company's by-laws provide that a quorum of two shareholders in person or represented by proxy holding or representing by proxy at least 25% of the Company's issued shares carrying the right to vote at the meeting is required to transact business at a shareholders' meeting. Shareholders, and their duly appointed proxies and corporate representatives, as well as the Company's auditors, are entitled to be admitted to the Company's annual and special shareholders' meetings.

Authorized Capital

The Company's authorized capital consists of an unlimited number of shares of one class designated as common shares. All outstanding common shares of the Company are fully paid and non-assessable. The holders of the common shares are entitled to one vote per share at meetings of shareholders and to receive dividends if, as and when declared by the directors of the Company. In the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, after payment of all outstanding debts, the remaining assets of the Company available for distribution would be distributed rateably to the holders of the common shares. Holders of the common shares of the Company have no pre-emptive,

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            157

Table of Contents



redemption, exchange or conversion rights. The Company may not create any class or series of shares or make any

2010 ANNUAL REPORT            137

Table of Contents



modification to the provisions attaching to the Company's common shares without the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes cast by the holders of the common shares.

Majority Voting Policy

As part of its ongoing review of corporate governance practices, on February 20, 2008 the Board of Directors adopted a policy providing that in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee who receives a greater number of votes "withheld" than votes "for" will tender his or her resignation to the Chairman of the Board of Directors promptly following the shareholders' meeting. The Corporate Governance Committee will consider the offer of resignation and will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether to accept it. In considering whether or not to accept the resignation, the Corporate Governance Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by the members of such Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee will beis expected to accept the resignation except in situations where the considerations would warrant the applicable director continuing to serve on the Board.Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will make its final decision and announce it in a newspress release within 90 days following the shareholders' meeting. A director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this policy will not participate in any meeting of the Board of Directors or the Corporate Governance Committee at which the resignation is considered.


Disclosure of Share Ownership

TheSecurities Act (Ontario) currently provides that the directors and officers of an issuer and its subsidiaries and any person or company that beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, voting securities of an issuer or that exercises control or direction over voting securities of an issuer or a combination of both, carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all the issuer's outstanding voting securities (a "significant shareholder"), as well as the directors and officers of any significant shareholder, (each an "insider")reporting insider must, within 10 days of becoming ana reporting insider, file aan insider report in the required form effective the date on which the person became an insider, disclosing (a) any direct or indirect beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, securities of the reporting issuer. TheSecurities Act (Ontario) also provides forissuer, and (b) any interest in, or right or obligation associated with, an agreement, arrangement or understanding to which the filing ofreporting insider is a report by an insider of a reporting issuer who acquires or transfers securities of the issuer or who enters into, materially amends or terminates an arrangementparty, the effect of which is to alter, directly or indirectly, the reporting insider's economic interest in a security of the reporting issuer or the insider's economic exposure to the issuer. These reportsreporting issuer (a "related financial instrument"). A reporting insider must be filedalso file an insider report within five days afterof any change to (a) its direct or indirect beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, securities of the reportable event. TheSecurities Act (Ontario) also requires these reports to be filed by reporting insiders within five days afterissuer, or (b) its interest in, or right or obligation associated with, a related financial instrument. A reporting insider includes the applicable event, though are only required by the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, directors and certain officers of a reporting issuer or a major subsidiary of a reporting issuer, and any person or company responsible forthat has beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, or a principal business unitcombination of beneficial ownership of, and significant shareholderscontrol or direction over, securities of a reporting issuer, including securities issuable upon the exercise of conversion or purchase rights or obligations within 60 days pursuant to a single transaction or a series of linked transactions, carrying more than 10% of the Company.voting rights attached to all the reporting issuer's outstanding voting securities, as well as the directors and certain officers of such a shareholder. The officers that are reporting insiders in respect of a reporting issuer are the following officers of the issuer, a major subsidiary of the issuer or a significant shareholder of the issuer: the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer, the chief operating officer (or persons that act in such roles or in similar capacities) and any other officer that in the ordinary course receives or has access to information as to material facts or material changes concerning the reporting issuer before the material facts or material changes are generally disclosed and directly or indirectly exercises significant power or influence over the business, operations, capital or development of the reporting issuer.

TheAdditionally, the Securities Act (Ontario) also provides that aany person or company (an "acquiror") that acquires (whether or not by way of a take-over bid, offer to acquire or subscription from treasury) beneficial ownership of, voting or equity securitiesthe power to exercise control or securities convertible intodirection over, voting or equity securities of any class of a reporting issuer, including securities of that together with previously heldclass issuable upon the exercise of conversion or purchase rights or obligations within 60 days pursuant to a single transaction or a series of linked transactions, that, when added to the person or company's securities brings the total holdings of such holder tothat class, constitute 10% or more of the outstanding securities of that class (together with any such securities held by any person or company acting jointly or in concert with the acquiror), must (a)promptly issue and file forthwith a news release containing certain prescribed information and, (b) file a report within two business days, file an early warning report, each containing the same information set out in the news release.certain prescribed information. The acquiring person or companyacquiror must also issue a news release and file a report each time it(a) the acquiror, or any person or company that is acting jointly or in concert with the aquiror, acquires inbeneficial ownership of, or the aggregate,power to exercise control or direction over, an additional 2% or more of the outstanding securities of the same class and every timeor (b) there is a change to any material fact in the news release anddisclosure set out in the report previously issued andmost recently filed.

The rules in the United States governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed are more stringent than those discussed above. Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), imposes reporting requirements on persons who acquire beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than 5% of a class of an equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. In general, such persons must file, within ten days after such acquisition, a report of beneficial ownership with the SEC containing the information prescribed by the regulations under Section 13(d) of the

158            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents



Exchange Act and promptly file an amendment to such report to disclose any material change to the information reported, including any acquisition or disposition of 1% or more of the outstanding securities of the registered class. Certain institutional investors that acquire shares in the ordinary course of business and not with the purpose or with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the issuer, are subject to lesser disclosure obligations.


Material Contracts

The Company believes the following contracts constitute the only material contracts to which it is a party.

138            AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LIMITED

Table of Contents


Credit AgreementFacility

The Company entered into a bank credit facility (the "Credit Facility")the Credit Facility on June 22, 2010August 4, 2011 with a group of financial institutions providing for a $1.2 billion unsecured revolving bank credit facility that replaced the Company's previous unsecured revolving bank credit facilities.facility. The Credit Facility was subsequently amended on July 20, 2012. The Credit Facility matures and all indebtedness thereunder is due and payable on June 22, 2014.2017. The Company, with the consent of lenders representing at least 662/3% of the aggregate commitments under the facility, has the option toCredit Facility, may extend the term of the facilityCredit Facility for additional one-year terms. The Credit Facility is available in multiple currencies through prime rate and base rate advances, priced at the applicable rate plus a margin that ranges from 1.50%0.50% to 2.50%1.75% depending on certain financial ratios and through LIBOR advances, bankers' acceptances and letters of credit, priced at the applicable rate plus a margin that ranges from 2.50%1.50% to 3.50%2.75% depending on certain financial ratios. The lenders under the Credit Facility are each paid a standby fee at a rate that ranges from 0.750%0.3375% to 1.050%0.61875% of the undrawn portion of the facility, depending on certain financial ratios. Where credit exposure for all lenders is in the aggregate equal to or greater than 50% of the aggregate commitments, the standby fee and letter of credit fee shall be increased by 0.125%, provided that, if and so long as the Company has a credit rating by S&P of at least BBB, DBRS of at least BBB or Moody's of at least Baa2, such increase shall not apply. Payment and performance of the Company's obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by each of its significant subsidiaries and certain of its other subsidiaries (the "Guarantors" and, together with the Company, each an "Obligor").

The Credit Facility contains covenants that limit, among other things, the ability of an Obligor to:

The Company is also required to maintain a total net debt to EBITDA ratio below a specified maximum value as well as a minimum tangible net worth. Events of default under the Credit Facility include, among other things:

2012 ANNUAL REPORT            159

Table of Contents