UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
______________________

_________________________
FORM 20-F
_________________________

______________________

[ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

oREGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
or

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year endedJanuary 31, 2009

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010
or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________

or

[ ] SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Date of event requiring this shell company report ______________

oSHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report______________

Commission File Number 0-15688


CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of Incorporationincorporation or Organization)

organization)


455 Granville Street, Suite 400 Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1T1, Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)


David Wolfin, Tel:604-682-3701, Email: dwolfin@oniva.ca
455 Granville Street, Suite 400 Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1T1, Canada
Tel:604-682-3701, Email:
dwolfin@oniva.ca
(Name, telephone number, e-mailTelephone, E-mail and/or facsimileFacsimile number and addressAddress of Company contact person)

Contact Person)


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE


Not ApplicableNot Applicable
Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:


Common Shares, without Par Value
(Title of Class)


Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: NONE

The


Not Applicable
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding Common Sharesshares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
There were 25,513,271 common shares, without par value, issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2009, was 24,989,771.

2010.


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
[ ]
o Yes  [X] x No


If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [ ]
o Yes [X] x No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]
x Yes  [ ] o No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ]
o Yes  [ ] o No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
Large Accelerated FileoAccelerated FileroNon-Accelerated Filerx

Large Accelerated File [ ] Accelerated Filer [ ] Non-Accelerated Filer [X ]

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

US GAAP [ ]

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board [ ]

Other [X]

U.S. GAAP      o
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued 
by the International Accounting Standards Board 
oOther       x
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item thehe registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 [X] Item 18  [ ]

o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  [ ]o  No  [X]

x


(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS.)

YEARS)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

NOT APPLICABLE

 Yes o     Noo



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item Page
   
INTRODUCTION2
CURRENCYINTRODUCTION 2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSCURRENCY2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS2
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATE
OF MEASURE AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES2
GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS3
PART I 54
 Item 1.Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors54
 Item 2.Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable54
 Item 3.Key Information54
 Item 4.Information on the Company1011
 Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects3031
 Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees3435
 Item 7.Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions4246
 Item 8.Financial Information4447
 Item 9.The Offering and Listing4448
 Item 10.Additional Information4549
 Item 11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk5156
 Item 12.Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities5156
PART II 52
 Item 13.Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies5256
 Item 14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds5256
 Item 15T.Controls and Procedures5256
 Item 16A.Audit Committee Financial Expert5358
 Item 16B.Code of Ethics5358
 Item 16C.Principal Accountant Fees and Services5358
 Item 16D.Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees5459
 Item 16E.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers54
PART III 5459
 Item 17.16F.Financial StatementsChanges in Registrants Certifying Accountant5459
 Item 18.16G.Financial StatementsCorporate Governance5459
PART III60
 Item 17. Financial Statements60
Item 18.Financial Statements 61
Item 19.Exhibits5561
1

INTRODUCTION


INTRODUCTION

     Coral Gold Resources Ltd.,

In this Annual Report on Form 20-F, which we refer to as the “Annual Report”, except as otherwise indicated or as the context otherwise requires, the “Company”, was“we”, “our” or “us” refers to Coral Gold Resources Ltd.

We were organized under theCompany Actof the Province of British Columbia, Canada on January 22, 1981 under the name of Carol Energy Corporation, which name was changed to Coral Energy Corporation on March 3, 1982, and to Coral Gold Corp. on September 9, 1987.  On September 14, 2004, the Companywe changed itsour name to Coral Gold Resources Ltd. in conjunction with a 10 to 1 share consolidation.  The principal executive office of the Company is located at 455 Granville Street, Suite 400, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1T1, and its telephone number is 604-682-3701.

     In this annual report on Form 20-F, which we refer to as the “Annual Report”, except as otherwise indicated or as the context otherwise requires, the “Company”, “we” or “us” refers to Coral Gold Resources Ltd.


You should rely only on the information contained in this Annual Report.  We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different.  The information in this Annual Report may only be accurate on the date of this Annual Report or on or as at any other date provided with respect to specific information.

CURRENCY


Unless otherwise indicated in this Annual Report, all references to “Canadian Dollars”, “CDN$”, “dollars” or “$” are to the lawful currency of Canada and all references to “U.S. Dollars”, or “US$” are to the lawful currency of the United States.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Legislation Reform Act of 1995 concerning the Company’s plans for its mineral properties which may affect the future operating results and financial position.  Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and financial position to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.  These factors include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 3.D., and “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” in Item 5.  Statements concerning reserves and resources may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that such statements reflect the conclusion that deposits may be economically exploitable. & #160;Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates”, or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be “forward-looking statements”.

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATE OF MEASURE AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES

We advise United States investors that although the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources” are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to as the “SEC”, does not recognize them. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the Company’s mineral resources in these categories will ever be converted into mineral reserves.

2


GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS

anomalous

A value, or values, in which the amplitude is statistically between that of a low contrast anomaly and a high contrast anomaly in a given data set.

assay

assay

An analysis to determine the presence, absence or quantity of one or more components.

elements.
au

au

The elemental symbol for gold.

breccia

breccia

A rock in which angular fragments are surrounded by a mass of finer-grained material.

chalcopyrite

Copper iron sulphide mineral.
chalcopyritechert

Copper sulphide mineral.

chert

A rock resembling flint and consisting essentially of crypto-crystalline quartz or fibrous chalcedony.

cretaceous

cretaceous

The geologic period extending from 135 million to 65 million years ago.

Diamond drill

A rotary type of rock drill that cutsuses diamonds to cut a core of rock that is recovered in long cylindrical sections, two centimeters or more in diameter.

epidote

epidote

Calcium, aluminum, iron silicate mineral commonly occurring in hydrothermally altered

carbonate-bearing rocks.
fault

carbonate-bearing rocks.

fault

A fracture in a rock where there has been displacement of the two sides.

grade

grade

The concentration of each ore metal in a rock sample, usually given as weight percent.  Where extremely low concentrations are involved, the concentration may be given in grams per tonne (g/t or gpt) or ounces per ton (oz/t).  The grade of an ore deposit is calculated, often using sophisticated statistical procedures, as an average of the grades of a very large number of samples collected from throughout the deposit.

GSR

GSR

Payment of a percentage of gross mining profits commonly known as gross smelter return royalty.

heap leaching

A process whereby valuable metals, usually gold and silver, are leached from a heap, or pad, of crushed ore by leaching solutions percolating down through the heap and collected from a sloping, impermeable liner below the pad.

hydrothermal

hydrothermal

Hot fluids, usually mainly water, in the earth’s crust which may carry metals and other compounds in solution to the site of ore deposition or wall rock alteration.

intrusive

intrusive

A rock mass formed below the earth’s surface from magma which has intruded into a pre- existingpre-existing rock mass.

lode claim

A mining claim on an area containing a known vein or lode.

mineral reserve

The economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of the reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A mineral reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined. Mineral resources are sub-divided in order of increasing confidence into “probable” and “proven” mineral reserves. A probable mineral reserve has a lower level of confidence than a proven mineral reserve. The term “mineral reserve” does not necessarily signify that extraction facilities are in place or operative or that all governmental approvals have beenbe en received. It does signify that there are reasonable expectations of such approvals.

mineral resource

The estimated quantity and grade of mineralization that is of potential economic merit. A resource estimate does not require specific mining, metallurgical, environmental, price and cost data, but the nature and continuity or mineralization must be understood.

3



Mineral resources are sub-divided in order of increasing geological confidence into “inferred”inferred, “indicated”indicated, and “measured”measured categories. An inferred mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than that applied to an indicatedindicate d mineral resource. An indicated mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than an inferred mineral resource, but has a lower level of confidence than a measured mineral resource. A mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic or fossilized organic material in or on the earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction.


mineralization

mineralization

Usually implies minerals of value occurring in rocks.

net smelter or NSRRoyalty

Payment of a percentage of net mining profits after deducting applicable smelter charges.

oxide

oxide

A compound of oxygen and some other element.

ore

ore

A natural aggregate of one or more minerals which may be mined and sold at a profit, or from which some part may be profitably separated.

placer claim

A mining claim located upon gravel or ground whose mineral contents are extracted by the use of water, by sluicing, hydraulicking, etc.

porphyry

porphyry

Rock type with mixed crystal sizes, i.e. containing larger crystals of one or more minerals.

pyrrhotite

pyrrhotite

A bronze coloured mineral of metallic lustre that consists of ferrous sulphide and is attracted by a magnet.

pyrite

pyrite

Iron sulphide mineral.

quartz

quartz

Silica or SiO2, a common constituent of veins, especially those containing gold and silver mineralization.

silification

The flooding or inundation of the rock by colloidal silica.
silificationsulfidation

A processRefers to the amount of fossilization whereby the original organic components of an organism are replaced by silica, as quartz, chalcedony, or opal.

sulphide minerals present in mineral deposits.
ton

sulfidation

In conditioning a flotation pulp, addition of soluble alkaline sulfides in aqueous solution to produce a sulfide-metal layer on an oxidized ore surface.

ton

Imperial measurement of weight equivalent to 2,000 pounds.

tonne

tonne

Metric measurement of weight equivalent to 1,000 kilograms (or 2,204.6 pounds).

trench

trench

A long, narrow excavation dug through overburden, or blasted out of rock, to expose a vein or ore structure.

veins

veins

The mineral deposits that are found filling openings in rocks created by faults or replacing rocks on either side of faults.

4


3

PART I

Item 1.  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors


Not applicable.

Item 2.  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable


Not applicable.

Item 3.  Key Information


A.           Selected Financial Data


The selected historical financial information presented in the table below for each year ended January 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005,2006, is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company.  The audited consolidated financial statements and notes for each year in the three year period ended January 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 20072008 are included in this Annual Report.  The selected historical financial information for each year ended January 31, 20062007 and 2005,2006, presented in the table below are derived from financial statements of the Company that are not included in this Annual Report.  The selected financial information presented below should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto (Item 17) and the Operating and Financial Review and Prospects (Item 5) included elsewhere in this Annual Report.


The selected financial data has been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, which we refer to as “Canadian GAAP”.  The consolidated financial statements included in Item 17 in this Annual Report are also prepared under Canadian GAAP.  Included within these consolidated financial statements in Note 1816 is a reconciliation between Canadian GAAP and United States generally accepted accounting principals, referred to as “US GAAP”, which differ, among other things, in respect to the recording of the investments in marketable securities, deferred exploration expenditures, recognition of compensation expense upon the issuance of stock options and recognition of future income tax liabilities.

Canadian GAAP Year ended January 31, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Operations               
Revenue$ - $ - $ - $ - $- 
Expense               
     General and Administrative 2,516,862  1,359,172  1,983,965  2,301,983  866,085 
Net Loss (3,746,165) (1,319,185) (2,528,614) (2,263,288) (983,665)
Net Loss Per Share (0.15) (0.06) (0.13) (0.16) (0.07)
                
Weighted Average Number of               
       Shares Issued 24,979,312  23,570,728  19,857,210  14,369,643  13,889,676 

  As at January 31, 
Balance Sheet 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Working Capital 959,419  3,322,447  2,196,772  36,519  1,400,605 
Total Assets 17,633,626  18,185,688  14,892,422  11,385,912  10,737,683 
Liabilities 5,378,755  3,925,356  3,991,576  3,711,170  2,761,897 
Shareholders’ Equity 12,254,871  14,260,332  10,900,846  7,674,742  7,975,786 

  Year Ended January 31, 
Canadian GAAP 
2010
  
2009
  
2008
  
2007
  
2006
 
Operations               
Revenue $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Expense                    
General and Administrative  1,613,713   2,516,862   1,359,172   1,983,965   2,301,983 
Net Income (loss)  1,711,611   (3,746,165)  (1,319,185)  (2,528,614)  (2,263,288)
Net Earnings (loss) Per Share  0.07   (0.15)  (0.06)  (0.13)  (0.16)
                     
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding  25,093,778   24,979,312   23,570,728   19,857,210   14,369,643 
  As at January 31, 
Balance Sheet  2010   2009   2008   2007   2006 
Working Capital  648,921   959,419   3,322,447   2,196,772   36,519 
Total Assets  17,791,566   17,633,626   18,185,688   14,892,422   11,385,912 
Liabilities  2,022,447   5,378,755   3,925,356   3,991,576   3,711,170 
Shareholders’ Equity  15,769,119   12,254,871   14,260,332   10,900,846   7,674,742 
4

US GAAP Year Ended January 31, 
  
2010
  
2009
  
2008
  
2007
  
2006
 
Operations               
Revenue $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Income (loss) for year under Canadian GAAP  1,711,611   (3,746,165)  (1,319,185)  (2,528,614)  (2,263,288)
Adjustments:                    
Deferred exploration expenditures  (324,301)  (1,683,613)  (2,006,961)  (1,646,060)  (584,880)
Future income taxes  (2,774,334)  533,297   620,710   479,270   187,865 
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (465,402)  866,933   (553,133)  89,877   (214,051)
Net loss for the year under US GAAP  (1,852,426)  (4,029,548)  (3,258,569)  (3,605,527)  (2,874,354)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities  465,643   (88,479)  (19,352)  76,693   (14,581)
Comprehensive loss for the year per US GAAP  (1,386,783)  (4,118,027)  (3,277,921)  (3,528,834)  (2,888,935)
Loss per share under US GAAP  (0.06)  (0.16)  (0.14)  (0.18)  (0.20)

  As at January 31, 
Balance Sheet 
2010
  
2009
  
2008
  
2007
  
2006
 
Total assets under Canadian GAAP  17,791,566   17,633,626   18,185,688   14,892,442   11,385,912 
Adjustments  (14,718,069)  (14,393,768)  (12,710,156)  (10,635,312)  (9,065,945)
Total assets under US GAAP  3,073,497   3,239,858   5,475,532   4,257,110   2,319,967 
                     
Total equity under Canadian GAAP  15,769,119   12,254,871   14,260,332   10,900,846   7,674,742 
Adjustments  (13,337,109)  (9,773,072)  (9,489,690)  (7,482,423)  (6,482,203)
Total equity under US GAAP  2,432,010   2,481,799   4,770,642   3,418,423   1,192,539 

5



US GAAP Year Ended January 31, 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Operations               
Revenue$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 
Loss for year under Canadian GAAP (3,746,165) (1,319,185) (2,528,614) (2,263,288) (983,665)
Adjustments:               
   Deferred exploration expenditures (1,683,613) (2,006,961) (1,646,060) (584,880) (897,908)
   Future income taxes 533,297  620,710  479,270  187,865  262,275 
   Foreign exchange gain 866,933  (553,133) 89,877  (214,051) (157,429)
   Writedown of deferred exploration               
         expenditures -  -  -  -  - 
Net loss for the year under US GAAP (4,029,548) (3,258,569) (3,605,527) (2,874,354) (1,776,727)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment               
   securities (88,479) (19,352) 76,693  (14,581) 5,771 
Comprehensive loss for the year per US               
   GAAP (4,118,027) (3,277,921) (3,528,834) (2,888,935) (1,770,956)
Loss per share under US GAAP (0.16) (0.14) (0.18) (0.20) (0.13)
                
  As at January 31, 
Balance Sheet 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Total assets under Canadian GAAP 17,633,626  18,185,688  14,892,442  11,385,912  10,737,683 
Adjustments (14,393,768) (12,710,156) (10,635,312) (9,065,945) (8,466,484)
Total assets under US GAAP 3,239,858  5,475,532  4,257,110  2,319,967  2,271,199 
                
Total equity under Canadian GAAP 12,254,871  14,260,332  10,900,846  7,674,742  7,975,786 
Adjustments (9,783,392) (9,500,010) (7,492,743) (6,492,523) (5,866,876)
Total equity under US GAAP 2,471,479  4,760,322  3,408,103  1,182,219  2,108,910 

Exchange Rates


The following table sets forth information as to the period end, average, the high and the low exchange rate for Canadian Dollars and U.S. Dollars for the periods indicated based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in Canadian Dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Canadian dollar = US$1).

Year Ended    
January 31,AveragePeriod EndHighLow
20051.29601.23801.39681.1774
20061.20601.14391.27041.1439
20071.13581.17921.18241.0990
20081.06031.00221.18530.9170
20091.08491.23641.29690.9719

Year Ended
January 31,
 
Average
 
Period End
 
High
 
Low
2006 1.2060 1.1439 1.2704 1.1439
2007 1.1358 1.1792 1.1824 1.0990
2008 1.0603 1.0022 1.1853 0.9170
2009 1.0849 1.2364 1.2969 0.9719
2010 1.1272 1.0650 1.3000 1.0251

The following table sets forth the high and low exchange rate for the past six months based on the noon buying rate.  As of August 10, 2009,2010, the exchange rate was CDN$1.08481.0348 for each US$1.

MonthHighLow
February 20091.28901.2192
March 20091.30001.2245
April 20091.26431.1940
May 20091.18721.0872
June 20091.16251.0827
July 20091.16551.0790

6


Month
 
High
 
Low
February 2010 1.0734 1.0420
March 2010 1.0421 1.0113
April 2010 1.0201 0.9961
May 2010 1.0778 1.0116
June 2010 1.0606 1.0199
July 2010 1.0660 1.0199

B.   Capitalization and Indebtedness


Not Applicable.


C.   Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds


Not Applicable.

6


D.   Risk Factors


In addition to the other information presented in this Annual Report, the following should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business.  This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.


We will be required to raise additional capital to mine our properties.The Company is currently in the exploration stage of its properties.  If the Company determines based on its most recent information that it is feasible to begin operations on its properties, the Company will be required to raise additional capital in order to develop and bring the properties into production.  The Company’s ability to raise funds will depend on several factors, including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, its properties, its prospects, metal prices, businesses competing for financing and its financial condition. There can be no assurance that theThe Company willmay not be able to raise funds, or to raise funds on commercially reasonable terms.

If the Company is unable to raise additional funds, it may not be able to develop its properties or any of its business plans as described in this Annual Report.


The commercial quantities of ore cannot be accurately predicted.Whether an ore body will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors including the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as mineral prices and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.  The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in a mineral deposit being unprofitable.


The mining industry is highly speculative and involves substantial risks. The mining industry, from exploration, development and production is a speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production.  The marketability of minerals acquired or discovered by the Company may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment, andan d government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, and environmental protection.  The combination of such factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return on investment capital.


The Company’s properties are all at the exploration stage and have no proven reserves. All of the Company’s properties are in the exploration stage only and are without a known body of ore. If the Company does not discover a body of ore in its properties, the Company will search for other properties where it can continue similar work.


The Company’s mineral exploration efforts may be unsuccessful. Despite exploration work on its mineral claims, no known bodies of commercial ore or economic deposits have been established on any of the Company’s properties.  In addition, the Company is at the exploration stage on all of its properties and substantial additional work will be required in order to determine if any economic deposits occur on the Company’s properties. Even in the event commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, the exploration properties might not be brought into a state of commercial production.  Finding mineral deposits is dependent on a number of factors, including the technical skill of exploration personnel involved.  The commercial viabilityviabilit y of a mineral deposit once discovered is also dependent on a number of factors, some of which are particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices.

7



Competition for mineral land.  There is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available for acquisition, claim staking or leasing in the areas where the Company contemplates expanding its operations and conducting exploration activities. Many participants are engaged in the mining business, including large, established mining companies.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully for new mining properties.

7


Uncertainty of exploration and development programs. The Company’s profitability is significantly affected by the costs and results of its exploration and development programs.  As mines have limited lives based on proven and probable mineral reserves, the Company actively seeks to expand its mineral reserves, primarily through exploration, development and strategic acquisitions. Exploration for minerals is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently unsuccessful.  Among the many uncertainties inherent in any gold and silver exploration and development program are the location of economic ore bodies, the development of appropriate metallurgical processes, the receipt of necessary governmental permits and the construction of miningminin g and processing facilities. Assuming the discovery of an economic deposit, depending on the type of mining operation involved, several years may elapse from the initial phases of drilling until commercial operations are commenced and, during such time, the economic feasibility of production may change. Accordingly, the Company’s exploration and development programs may not result in any new economically viable mining operations or yield new mineral reserves to expand current mineral reserves.


Licenses and permits.  The operations of the Company require licenses and permits from various governmental authorities.  The Company believes that it holds all necessary licenses and permits required under applicable laws and regulations and believes that it is presently complying in all material respects with the terms of such licenses and permits. However, such licenses and permits are subject to change in various circumstances. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and permits as are required to explore and develop its properties, commence construction or operation of mining facilities and properties under exploration or development or to maintain continued operations that economically justify the cost.


Litigation.Although the Company is not currently subject to litigation, it may become involved in disputes with other parties in the future which may result in litigation.  Any litigation could be costly and time consuming and could divert the Company’s management from the Company’s business operations.  In addition, if the Company is unable to resolve any litigation favorably, it may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial performance, cash flow and results of operations.


Acquisitions.  The Company undertakes evaluations of opportunities to acquire additional mining properties.  Any resultant acquisitions may be significant in size, may change the scale of the Company’s business, and may expose the Company to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks.  The Company’s success in its acquisition activities depends on its ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, acquire them on acceptable terms, and integrate their operations successfully.  Any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks, such as a significant decline in the price of gold or silver, the ore body proving to be below expectations, the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, the potential disruption of the Company’s ongoing business, the inability of management to maximize the financial and strategic position of the Company through the successful integration of acquired assets and businesses, the maintenance of uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, the impairment of relationships with customers and contractors as a result of any integration of new management personnel and the potential unknown liabilities associated with acquired mining properties.  In addition, the Company may need additional capital to finance an acquisition.  Historically, the Company has raised funds through equity financing and the exercise of options and warrants.  However, the market prices for natural resources are highly speculative and volatile.  Accordingly, instability in prices may affect interest in resource properties and the development of and production from such properties that may adversely affect the Company’sCompanyR 17;s ability to raise capital to acquire and explore resource properties. There can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions.

8



Conflict of interest.Certain directors and officers of the Company are officers and/or directors of, or are associated with, other natural resource companies that acquire interests in mineral properties.  Such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time.  The directors are required by law, however, to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and to disclose any personal interest which they may have in any material transaction which is proposed to be entered into with the Company and to abstain from voting as a director for the approval of any such transaction.

8


Uncertainty of continuing as a going concern.The continuation of the Company and the recoverability of mineral property costs depends upon its ability to discover economically recoverable mineral reserves, attain profitable operations and generate cash flow from operations and/or to raise equity capital through the sale of its securities.  The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include the adjustments that would be necessary if the Company were unable to continue as a going concern.


Limited and volatile trading volume.Although the Company’s common shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange referred to as the(the “TSX-V” and), the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (the “FSE”), and the Berlin-Bremen Stock Exchange referred to as the “FSE”, and quoted in the United States on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board referred to as the(the “OTCBB”,) the volume of trading has been limited and volatile in the past and is likely to continue to be so in the future, reducing the liquidity of an investment in the Company’s common shares and making it difficult for investors to readily sell their shares in the open market.  Without a liquid market for the Company’s common shares, investors may be unable to sell their shares at favorable times and prices and may be requiredrequir ed to hold their shares in declining markets or to sell them at unfavorable prices.


Volatility of share price.In recent years, securities markets in Canada have experienced a high level of price volatility.  The market price of many resource companies, particularly those, like the Company, that are considered speculative exploration companies, have experienced wide fluctuations in price, resulting in substantial losses to investors who have sold their shares at a low price point.  These fluctuations are based only in part on the level of progress of exploration, and can reflect general economic and market trends, world events or investor sentiment, and may sometimes bear no apparent relation to any objective factors or criteria.  During the 20092010 fiscal year, the Company’s common share price fluctuated on the TSX-V between a low of $0.11$0.29 and a high of $1.49.$1.00.  Significant fluctuations in the Company’s common share price is likely to continue, and could potentially increase in the future.


Difficulty for United States investors to effect service of process against the Company.The Company is incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada.  Consequently, it will be difficult for United States investors to effect service of process in the United States upon the directors or officers of the Company, or to realize in the United States upon judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities under the United StatesSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The majority of the Company’s directors and officers are residents of Canada.  A judgment of a United States court predicated solely upon such civil liabilities would probablyli kely be enforceable in Canada by a Canadian court if the United States court in which the judgment was obtained had jurisdiction, as determined by the Canadian court, in the matter.  There is substantial doubt whether an original action could be brought successfully in Canada against any of such persons or the Company predicated solely upon such civil liabilities.


The Company is subject to foreign currency fluctuations. The Company operates in more than one country and the Company’s functional currency is the Canadian Dollar.  The Company’s offices are located in Canada, all of its mining exploration properties are located in United States, and the Company’s financial results are reported in Canadian Dollars. The Company’s currency fluctuation exposure is primarily to the U.S. Dollar and the Canadian Dollar. The Company reported a foreign exchange gain of $464,851 in fiscal 2010.  The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes, nor does the Company hedge its foreign currency exposure to manage the Company’s foreign currency fluctuation risk.  ; Fluctuations in and among the various currencies in which the Company operates could have a material effect on the Company’s operations and its financial results.

The Company has incurred net losses since its inception and expect losses to continue.The Company has not been profitable since its inception. Forinception; however, for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, we2010, the Company had net income of $1,711,611 as a net lossresult of $3,746,165 andfuture income tax recovery but an accumulated deficit on January 31, 20092010 of $32,967,732.$31,256,121.  As the Company is currently at the exploration stage and has no reserves of precious metals, management expects the Company to continue to suffer net losses for the foreseeable future.

9


There are no assurances that we will discover minerals on a commercially viable basis.The Company’s ability to generate revenues and profits is expected to occur through exploration, development and production of its existing properties as well as through acquisitions of interests in new properties.  Substantial expenditures will be incurred in an attempt to establish the economic feasibility of mining operations by identifying mineral deposits and establishing ore reserves through drilling and other techniques, developing metallurgical processes to extract metals from ore, designing facilities and planning mining operations.

9


The economic feasibility of a project depends on numerous factors, including the cost of mining and production facilitiesfacil ities required to extract the desired minerals, the total mineral deposits that can be mined using a given facility, the proximity of the mineral deposits to a user of the minerals, and the market price of the minerals at the time of sale.  There is no assurance that existing or future exploration programs or acquisitions will result in the identification of deposits that can be mined profitably.


The Company’s exploration activities are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations.Laws and regulations govern various aspects of the exploration, development, mining, production, importing and exporting of minerals;Company’s business including the following: taxes; labor standards; occupational health; waste disposal; protection of the environment; mine safety; toxic substances; and  other matters.the exploration, development, mining, production, importing and exporting of minerals.  In many cases, licenses and permits are required to conduct mining operations.  Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations and activities of mining companies or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on the Company.  Applicable laws and regulations will requirerequi re the Company to make certain capital and operating expenditures to initiate new operations.  Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to stop its exploration activities once it is started until a particular problem is remedied or to undertake other remedial actions.


Market price is highly speculative.The market prices of metals are highly speculative and volatile. Instability in metal prices may affect the interest in mining properties and the exploration, development and production of such properties. If gold prices substantially decline, this may adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital to explore for existing and new mineral properties.


The Company operates in a highly competitive industry.  The Company competes with other developmental resource companies which have similar operations, and many competitors have operations and financial resources and industry experience greater than those of the Company. The Company may encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in its efforts to acquire mineral properties and hire experienced resource industry professionals.  Increased competition in the Company’s business could adversely affect its ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.


Penny stock rules may make it more difficult to trade the Company’s common shares.The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price of less than US$5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than US$5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions.  The Company’s securities may be covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and accredited investors such as institutions with assets in excess of US$5,000,000 or an individual with net worth in excess of US$1,000,000 or annual income exceeding US$200,000 or US$300,000 jointly with his or her spouse.  0;For transactions covered by this rule, the broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and receive the purchaser’s written agreement of the transaction prior to the sale.  Consequently, the rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company’s securities and also affect the ability of its investors to sell their shares in the secondary market.

     The Company is subject


FINRA rules will make it more difficult to foreign currency fluctuations. The Company operates in more than one country andtrade the Company’s functional currency is the Canadian Dollar.common shares. The Company’s offices are located in Canada, all of its mining exploration properties are located in United States,Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and the Company’s financial results are reported in Canadian Dollars. The Company’s currency fluctuation exposure is primarilysell our stock. In addition to the U.S. Dollar“penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer.  Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and the Canadian Dollar. The Company reportedother information.   Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a foreign exchange loss of $765,770 in fiscal 2009. The Company doeshigh probability that speculative low priced securities will not use derivative financial instrumentsbe suitable for speculative trading purposes, nor does the Company hedge its foreign currency exposureat least some customers.  FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to manage the Company’s foreign currency fluctuation risk. Fluctuations inrecommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and among the various currencies in which the Company operates couldsell our stock and have a materialan adverse effect on the Company’s operations and its financial results.

market for our shares
10

Item 4.  Information on the Company

Cautionary Note to United States Investors

     The Company describes its properties utilizing mining terminology such as “measured resources” and “indicated resources” that are required by Canadian regulations but are not recognized by the SEC.United States investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

10


A.   History and Development of the Company


The Company was organized under theCompany Actof the Province of British Columbia, Canada on January 22, 1981 under the name of Carol Energy Corporation, which name was changed to Coral Energy Corporation on March 3, 1982, and to Coral Gold Corp. on September 9, 1987.  On September 14, 2004, the Company changed itits name to Coral Gold Resources Ltd in conjunction with a 10 to 1 share consolidation.  On July 17, 2007, the shareholders of the Company amended the share structure by subdividing the Company’s issued share capital of 8,267,360 common shares into 24,802,080 common shares, every one common share being subdivided into three common shares. On July 15, 2004, the Company transitioned to the British Columbia Business Corporations Act. The principal executive office of the Company is located at 455 Granville Street, Suite 400, Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1T1, and its telephone number is 604-682-3701.


The Company is a natural resource company primarily engaged in the exploration and development of natural resource properties.  Its principal business activities have been the exploration of certain mineral properties located in the States of Nevada and California in the United States. Since fiscal 2007,2008, the Company has spent $5,343,825$4,041,177 on mineral property acquisition and exploration expenditures on its properties known as the Robertson Mining Claims located in the State of Nevada.  The Robertson Mining Claimsproperties comprise threeof four separate claim groups known as: (i) the Core Claims; (ii) the Carve Out Claims, and (iii) the Norma Sass and (iv) the Ruf Claims.


In the 2006 fiscal year, the Company completed the purchase of 1,391,860 shares of Marcus Corporation which we refer to as “Marcus”(“Marcus”), representing 98.49% of the total issued shares of Marcus.  Marcus is a non-reporting Nevada corporation which owns the Marcus mining claims, consisting of 39 unpatented lode claims and two placer claims, and which comprise a portion of the Company’s Robertson Property.  By acquiring Marcus, the Company now controls Marcus and owns an indirect interest in the mining lease between the Company and Marcus which provides for an annual advanced royalty to Marcus of US$12,000, and a 5% net smelter returns royalty up to a maximum payment of US$2.5 million.


In consideration of the acquisition, the Company issued one common share of the Company for every four common shares of Marcus, for a total of 347,964 common shares of the Company.  In addition, each tendering Marcus shareholder received a non-transferable share purchase warrant, permitting such shareholders to purchase one additional common share of the Company at an exercise price of $2.00 per share for a period of up to two years from the closing date of the acquisition, for every two shares of the Company received on the share exchange.


Please refer to Note 6 of the financial statements (Item 17) for information regarding the Company’s principal capital expenditures on its mineral properties.

     At the Annual General Meeting of the Company on July 17, 2007, the shareholders of the Company passed an ordinary resolution amending the Company’s share structure by subdividing the Company’s issued share capital of 8,267,360 common shares without par value into 24,802,080 common shares without par value, every one common share being subdivided into three common shares, referred to as the “Subdivision”.


B.   Business Overview

Operations and Principal Activities


Presently, the Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of mineral properties.  The Company is in the process of exploring its mineral properties and has not yet determined whether its mineral properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on any of the Company’s properties, and future exploration will be required before final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility is determined.


The Company’s mining claims are located in the states of Nevada and California in the United States.  The Company’s present principal exploration activities have been focused on the Robertson Mining Claims located in Crescent Valley, Nevada.

11



Competition

The mining industry in which the Company is engaged is highly competitive.  Competitors include well-capitalized mining companies, independent mining companies and other companies having financial and other resources far greater than those of the Company.  The companies compete with other mining companies in connection with the acquisition of gold and other precious metal properties.  In general, properties with a higher grade of recoverable mineral and/or which are more readily minable afford the owners a competitive advantage in that the cost of production of the final mineral product is lower.  Thus, a degree of competition exists between those engaged in the mining industries to acquire the most valuable properties.  As a result, the Company may eventually be unable to acquire attr active gold mining properties.

Seasonality

Due to the climate in the State of Nevada, the Company is generally not affected by seasonality.

Dependence on Customers and Suppliers

The Company is not dependent upon a single or few customers or suppliers for revenues or its operations.

Government Regulation

We are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations including environmental laws and regulations.  Environmental regulations impose, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the generation, handling, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and waste and in connection with spills, releases and emissions of various substances to the environment.  Environmental regulation also requires that facility sites and other properties associated with our operations be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities.  In addition, certain types of operations, including exploration and development projects and changes to certain existing projects, may require the submission an d approval of environmental impact assessments or permit applications.  Compliance with environmental regulation can require significant expenditures, including expenditures for clean up costs and damages arising out of contaminated properties and failure to comply with environmental regulations may result in the imposition of fines and penalties.  We believe that we are in substantial compliance with such laws and regulations; however, such laws and regulations may change in the future in a manner which will increase the burden and cost of compliance.

Certain laws and governmental regulations may impose liability on us for personal injuries, clean-up costs, environmental damages and property damages, as well as administrative, civil and criminal penalties. We maintain limited insurance coverage for sudden and accidental environmental damages, but do not maintain insurance coverage for the full potential liability that could be caused by sudden and accidental environmental damage. Accordingly, we may be subject to liability or may be required to cease production from properties in the event of such damages.
12


Environmental Regulations

The Company’s exploration programs in Nevada and California are subject to state and federal regulations regarding environmental considerations.  All operations involving the exploration for the production of minerals are subject to existing laws and regulations relating to exploration procedures, safety precautions, employee health and safety, air quality standards, pollution of streams and fresh water sources, odor, noise, dust and other environmental protection controls adopted by federal, state and local governmental authorities as well as the rights of adjoining property owners.  The Company may be required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that any proposed exploration for or production of minerals may have upon the environment. &# 160;All requirements imposed by any such authorities may be costly, time consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations.  Future legislation may significantly emphasize the protection of the environment, and, as a consequence, the activities of the Company may be more closely regulated to further the cause of environmental protection.  Such legislation, as well as further interpretation of existing laws in the United States, may require substantial increases in equipment and operating costs to the Company and delays, interruptions, or a termination of operations, the extent of which cannot be predicted.  Environmental problems known to exist at this time in the United States may not be in compliance with regulations that may come into existence in the future.  This may have a substantial impact upon the capital expenditures required of the Company in order to deal with such problem and could substantially reduce earnings.&# 160; At the present time, the Company’s exploration activities in Nevada are in compliance with all known environmental requirements.

The regulatory bodies that directly regulate the Company’s activities are the Bureau of Land Management (Federal) and the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (State).

C.    Organizational Structure

The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: Coral Energy Corporation of California, a California corporation which holds title to the Company’s California property, and Coral Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which holds title to the Company’s mining claims located in Nevada.  In the 2006 fiscal year, the Company completed the purchase of 1,391,860 shares, representing 98.49% of the issued shares, of Marcus, a Nevada Corporation that owns the Marcus mining claims, consisting of 39 unpatented lode claims and two placer claims, and which comprise a portion of the Company’s Robertson Property.

D.    Property, Plant and Equipment
Cautionary Note to United States Investors concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources
The Company describes its properties utilizing mining terminology such as “measured resources” and “indicated resources” that are required by Canadian regulations but are not recognized by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

This section uses the term “inferred resources”. The Company advised United States investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. “Inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resources exists, or is economically or legally minable.

Presently, the Company is an “exploration stage company”, as all of the Company’s properties are currently in the exploratory stage of development.  In order to determine if a commercially viable mineral deposit exists in any of the Company’s properties, further geological work will need to be done and a final evaluation based upon the results obtained to conclude economic and legal feasibility.
13


The Company’s primary focus has been on the Robertson Mining Claims, in Nevada, United States.

Robertson Mining Claims, Nevada, U.S.A.

The Robertson Mining Claims are located in Crescent Valley, Nevada on the western flanks of the Shoshone Range, 28 miles to the southeast of Battle Mountain, Nevada, which lies some 230 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada.  The Robertson Mining Claims comprise approximately 11,000 acres in the Bullion Mining District, Lander County, Nevada, and currently include 803 unpatented and patented lode and placer mining claims.  The Robertson Mining Claims comprise three separate claim groups known as: (i) the Core Claims; (ii) the Carve Out Claims, and (iii) the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims as described more particularly below.

These mining claims have been acquired over a period of several years from different sources.  The entire Robertson Mining Claims are subject to a 3% net smelter royalty to Geomex Development Eighth Partnership (“Geomex 8”), which royalty shall cease at such time as the sum of US$1,250,000 has been paid to Geomex 8, and various mining leases requiring minimum annual advanced royalties ranging from 4% to 10% of net smelter returns.

There is no underground or surface plant or equipment located on the Robertson Mining Claims.

14



15


(i)   Robertson Property
The Robertson Property – Operationsis the subject of three technical reports dated January 15, 2004, April 25, 2006 and January 27, 2008. The first two technical reports were prepared by Robert McCusker, P.Geol. in accordance with NI 43-101 (“McCusker Reports”). The third and most recent report was prepared by Beacon Hill Consultants (1988) Ltd. (“Beacon Hill”) of Vancouver, British Columbia (the “Beacon Hill Report”). The zones included in the Beacon Hill Report estimate are located within the Robertson’s Core claims only. The Company’s other Claim blocks, including Norma Sass, Lander Ranch, Ruf, Blue Nugget and the Excluded claims (joint ventured with Cortez Gold Mines (“Cortez”), a joint venture owned by Barrick Gold Corporation), were not part of the estimate.
Property Description and Location

The Robertson Property is an advanced-stage gold exploration project located in eastern Lander County, Nevada, 60 miles southwest of Elko.  Coral Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, acquired control of the Robertson Property in 1986. The core property consists of 562 unpatented federal lode claims, mill sites, placer claims and nine patented lode claims covering over 8,500 acres of public lands administered by the BLM. The Company is record owner of 485 claims and controls an additional 76 claims through a series of mineral leases and option agreements.

In 2001, a boundary agreement between the Company and Cortez resolved claim boundary overlaps and seniority issues along the east and south sides of the Robertson claim block. This agreement required both parties to amend and/or abandon certain claims in order to achieve the agreed upon boundary. This was completed during the 2002-2003 assessment year.

Approximately 76 of the 485 of the claims that comprise the Robertson Property are controlled by the Company through six mining leases and option agreements. The Core Claims held by the Company under lease or option agreements require minimum advance royalty payments and production royalties in the event of production.  Total annual payments for the various leases and minimum advance royalties are approximately US$86,000.

A summary compilation of the terms of these agreements are presented in the table below:

Mining Lease and Option Agreements

Company/Date
Number of Claims
Option Payment
Production Royalty
Advance Royalty Payment
Tenabo Gold Mining Co.
Nov. 30, 1975
13$2M8% NSR$12,000/yr
Northern Nevada Au, Inc.
Sept. 30, 1986
12$ -4% GSR$9,600/yr
Albany Gold Corp.
(Geomex)
All$1.25M3% NSRNil
Mauzy, et al
Apr. 21, 1989
36$1.5M2% NSR$18,000/yr
Jay and Grace Wintle9$ -5% GSR$21,600/yr
Filippini/Breckon
(June Claims)
6$1M3% NSR$25,000/yr

Annual federal rental fees of US$98,732, payable to the BLM, and Notice of Intent to Hold Mining Claims have been filed for the 2010-2011 assessment year.
16


History and Exploration

The Robertson Property is located in the Tenabo area, a sub-district of the Bullion mining district.  Historic lode mining in this district dates from 1905 and placer gold was discovered in many of the dry washes in the Tenabo area in 1916.  Between 1937 and 1939, a small dragline dredge and washing plant operated in the district, and a dredge was reported by Humphrey to be operating in lower Mill Gulch in 1945.

During 1966 through 1970, a number of companies explored the district in search of porphyry copper-style mineralization.  In 1968, while drilling a series of shallow rotary holes near the Gold Pan mine, Superior Oil discovered a small, but relatively high-grade zone of gold at shallow depths in what is now known as the Gold Pan zone; however, with additional drilling, Superior Oil quickly lost interest in the district.  They were soon followed by a number of junior mining companies, including Placer Development (1974-75), Teck Corporation (1977), Aaron Mining Ltd. (1975-86), and E & B Exploration Ltd. (1980-81), all of which sporadically explored the Tenabo area with limited success.  A summary of the drilling completed by these companies prior to the Company’s involvement (1986) is presented in the table below:

Summary of Pre-Coral Drilling Activities

at Robertson Property


 
Company
 
 
Date of Activity
 
 
Number and Type of Holes Drilled
 
 
Drill Footage(ft)
 
 
Target
Superior Oil 1968-70 92 Conv. Rotary c. 32,000 Gold Pan
Placer Development 1973-74 23 Conv. Rotary c. 3,500 none
Teck Corporation 1977 None none none
Aaron Mining Ltd. 1977 7 Conv. Rotary c.300 Gold Quartz
E & B Exploration Ltd. 1980-81 148 Rev. Circulation 30,807 Gold Pan
Totals   270 66,607  

Modern open pit mining and heap leaching began as early as 1974, when Aaron Mining Ltd. (“Aaron”), initiated a pilot leach operation on the Robertson Property. From 1978 through 1980, Aaron expanded its leaching operations and continued exploration and acquiring claims in the district.

In 1986, the Company acquired Aaron’s interest in the Robertson Property and immediately began a series of major drilling programs beginning in 1986 and continuing until 1989.  Mining operations on the Robertson Property commenced in 1988, but were suspended less than one year later.  During the operating life of the Robertson Property mine approximately 350,000 tons of low-grade material was placed on leach pads from which about 6,200 ounces of gold were recovered.
17


During 1986 through 1989, the Company completed approximately 380 reverse circulation drill holes and seven diamond drill holes, totaling about 109,377 feet.  Much of this drilling was focused in four resources areas including the Gold Pan, Gold Quartz, Gold Quartz extension (also called Gold Quartz West) and the Triplet Gulch areas.  The purpose of this drilling was to determine the limits and continuity of mineralization within these zones.  Nearly all of the reverse circulation holes were drilled vertically to an average depth of about 300 feet.

During the later stages of the exploration program, the Company completed two deep reverse circulation holes that reached depths of 1,400 feet and 1,810 feet, respectively.  In addition to resource definition, the Company also embarked on a program of district-wide exploratory and follow-up drilling of numerous surface anomalies.

In 1990, the Company and Amax Gold Exploration Inc. (“Amax”) entered into an amended and restated option and earn-in agreement in which Amax could earn a 60% interest in the Robertson Property by producing a bankable feasibility study.  Amax completed an exploration program that included drilling 338 reverse circulation holes and 62 diamond drill holes, totaling over 176,000 feet. As the feasibility study did not meet the requirements of the agreement, Amax returned the property to the Company in 1996.

In 1998, Cortez, entered into an option and earn-in agreement with the Company in which Cortez could earn a 70% interest in the Robertson Property by producing a bankable feasibility study.  The focus of Cortez’s exploration was to expand the 39A zone and test a number of outlying targets.  During 1999, Cortez completed 46 reverse circulation drill holes and a single flood rotary hole, totaling 57,000 feet.  Of the 13 holes directed at expanding the 39A zone, only two holes, 99401 and 99413, encountered significant mineralization.  This drilling program did little to expand the resource.  Of the remaining holes drilled by Cortez, only two holes (99406 and 99419) encountered significant mineralization.  Both holes were designed to offset and/or follow up existing drill i ntersections and surface gold anomalies.

After completing this drilling program, Cortez declared its interest in renegotiating the terms of the Option Agreement with the Company. When the Company declined, Cortez subsequently terminated the Option Agreement on December 30, 1999, and did not earn an interest in the Robertson Property.

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999, the Company entered into an option agreement dated October 8, 1998 which we refer to as the(the “Option Agreement”), with Placer Dome U.S. Inc., referred to as “Placer” (“Placer”), which was later assigned by Placer to the Cortez Joint Venture, doing business as Cortez Gold Mines (a joint venture owned by Placer and Kennecott Minerals), which we refer to as “Cortez”.

Cortez.


Effective December 30, 1999, pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement, Cortez elected to terminate the Option Agreement.  This required the Company to post its own security for the reclamation bond for the Robertson Property and obtain a full release of Placer’s guarantee of the original reclamation bond.  In order to satisfy its obligations under the Option Agreement, the Company spent a large portion of fiscal year 2003 conducting reclamation on the Robertson Property to reduce its US$2,000,000 reclamation bond that Placer had guaranteed for the Company.  The Company was able to obtain a release of Placer’s guarantee by conducting sufficient reclamation work to reduce the bonding requirement, and by raising sufficient funds to provide satisfactory alternative security of the reclamation bond.  The reclamation bond was reduced to US$786,100 during the fiscal year ended 2003, for which the Company posted cash.  In fiscal year ended 2006, with more reclamation work having been completed and accounted for, the reclamation bond was further reduced to US$228,205.  In fiscal year ended 2007, with further drilling activities being proposed and performed, the required reclamation bond was increased to US$282,268.  In fiscal year ended 2008, additional planned exploration activities in Nevada were approved and the required reclamation bond was increased to US$319,400 and then again in fiscal year ended 2009 up to US$389,360.

389,387. As at January 31, 2010, the total reclamation deposits were $408,075 (US$382,482).


During 2004 and 2005, the Company conducted three drilling programs consisting of 32 reverse circulation holes totaling 24,020 feet on the Robertson Property.  The focus of this exploration was to expand and further define the 39A Zone, test the “deep” Gold Pan Zone for extensions of the 39A Zone and offset previous ore-grade intersections in the “distal target area”.
18


The Company received a preliminary assessment report entitled “Update of the Geological Report on the Robertson Property” dated April 25, 2006 on the gold resources at its Robertson Property situated on the Battle Mountain – Eureka Trend (Cortez Trend) in Lander County, Nevada.  The Report was prepared by Robert McCusker, Consulting Geologist, a “qualified person” in accordance with the requirements ofNational Instrument 43-101implemented by the Canadian Securities Administration referred to as “NI(“NI 43-101”).


During fiscal 2006, the Company completed a major drilling program at its 100-percent-owned Robertson Property located on the Cortez gold trend in eastern Lander County, Nevada, USA.Robertson Property. Drilling was completed in two phases. The drilling program totaled 35,615 feet of reverse circulation drilling in 46 holes. Depths ranged from 450 feet to 1,500 feet. Due to the relatively flat-lying nature of mineralization at Robertson, all holes were drilled vertically.  Phase I consisted of 14 reverse circulation (RC) drill holes, CR06-2 through CR06-15, totaling 11,355 ftfeet which were completed in the immediate vicinity of the existing 39A Zone indicated mineral resource. Phase II consisted of 32 RC holes, CR06-16 through CR06-48A, totaling 24,260 ftfeet which were completed in (1) the Distal Zone; (2) on the northeast flank of Altenburg Hill; (3) in the gravel-covered area between the Altenburg Hill and the Porphyry Zone measured and indicated mineral resource; and (4) along a northeast-striking structural zone in the Porphyry Zone. Drilling operations during Phase I and Phase II drilling were directly supervised by Robert McCusker, a Consulting Geologist and “qualified person” pursuant to NI 43-101.

During 2007, the Company completed two deep flooded reverse circulation drill holes, TV07-1 and TV07-2, to depths of 2,990 ftfeet and 3,450 ft,feet, respectively. The drilling was designed to test the lower plate of the Roberts Mountains thrust fault (RMTF)(“RMTF”) for high-grade Carlin-type mineralization hosted by favorable carbonate strata.  TV07-1 intersected a thick sequence of fine grained siliceous sedimentary and volcanic rocks followed by biotite and quartz hornfels equivalents in the upper plate of the RMTF. Although the hole failed to reach the lower plate of the RMTF, it did intersect a number of narrow low-grade zones.  TV07-2 was collared along a dike-filled splay of the Try fault zone and intersected a sequence of mostly fine grained siliceous sedimentary rocks and hornfels to 3,080 ft,feet, at which pointp oint altered and mineralized limy mudstone in the lower plate was encountered. Beginning at 3,280 ft,3,080 feet, the hole returned 200 ftfeet of weakly to strongly anomalous gold values ranging from 0.031 to 2.190 ppm gold, including four 10-ft-thick10-foot-thick intervals that exceed 0.01 oz Au/t.

     In the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008, the Company purchased 100% interest in the 72 claims comprising the Fanny Komp/Elwood Wright lease which forms part of the core area of the Robertson Property for US$250,000.

12


     In February 2008, the Company received the final NI 43-101 compliantMineral Resource Estimate for the Robertson Property, Lander County, Nevadareport dated January 27, 2008, prepared by Beacon Hill Consultants Ltd. (“Beacon Hill”) of Vancouver, British Columbia. The new estimate, based on a gold price of US$600 per ounce, raises the Robertson Property inferred resource to over 2.3 million ounces of gold—an increase of 110% over the previous NI 43-101 estimate from April 2006. A portion of the oxide resources are locally exposed at the surface and are potentially in an open pit mining configuration. Some of the new resources remain open to expansion on strike and at depth.

     The zones included in the Beacon Hill estimate are located within the Robertson’s Core Claims only. Beacon Hill reported the following updated resource estimate:

Zone (Core Claims) Qty  Grade  Qty  Grade  Contained 
  (Tons)  oz Au/ton  (Tonnes)  g Au/tonne  oz Au 
Distal 10,355,041  0.0335  9,376,398  1.148  346,893 
39A 25,010,247  0.0287  22,690,382  0.984  717,794 
Triplet Gulch 5,904,713  0.0269  5,357,012  0.922  158,837 
Outside 2,187,500  0.0208  1,984,595  0.713  45,500 
Gold Pan Oxide 7,049,181  0.0262  6,395,323  0.898  184,689 
Altenburg Hill Oxide 4,558,402  0.0208  4,135,580  0.713  94,815 
Porphyry Oxide 19,121,927  0.0213  17,348,243  0.730  407,297 
Gold Pan Sulphide 12,053,279  0.0208  10,935,258  0.713  250,708 
Altenburg Hill Sulphide 584,016  0.0176  529,845  0.603  10,279 
Porphyry Sulphide 4,480,533  0.0223  4,064,934  0.765  99,916 
TOTALS 91,284.800  0.0250  82,817,600  0.870  2,316,728 

     For details on claim and gold zone locations, please see corresponding maps and diagrams at the Company’s website atwww.coralgold.com. The information contained in the Company’s website does not form part of this Annual Report.

     Resource estimate parameters:

  • Gold ounces were calculated on the basis of US$600/oz Au and 70% Au recovery.
  • The 0.015 ozAu/ton cut-off grade utilized to report the resource was derived from a mining cost of US$1.02/ton, process cost of US$5.00/ton and waste cost of US$1.14/ton.
  • The mineral resources in the table above were estimated using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves.
  • The database comprised a total of 1,160 drill holes, 533,453 feet (162,638 metres) of drilling and 101,757 gold assays.
  • The inferred resource covers 6 distinct and separate areas; Distal, 39A, Gold Pan, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill, Southern Area and then all remaining blocks outside these areas that warrant inclusion as an inferred resource. In addition, Gold Pan, Porphyry and Altenburg Hill were separated into oxide and sulphide zones for analysis and modeling.
  • An interpreted mineralized envelope was modeled into a solid in MineSight 3DTM, with six area mineralized zones and then separated into oxide and sulphide zones.
  • Block dimensions of 25 feet (7.6 m) North, 25 feet (7.6 m) East and 20 feet (6 m) vertically.
  • Grade interpolation - 20 foot (6 m) composites.
  • Composites greater than 0.075 ozAu/ton (2.33 gAu/tonne) limited in influence to 100 feet (30.5 m).
  • Tonnage estimates are based on 200 bulk historic density measurements carried out by previous operators. These were assigned to each block by zone. The resources are categorized as inferred since the amount and distribution of bulk tonnage factor data is sparse.

     The Company commissioned Beacon Hill to not only update the Robertson resource estimate but to also outline a program for continued development of the Core Claims in 2008 and beyond. Beacon Hill recommended a three-pronged development approach:

13



1)

Additional exploratory and definition drilling to increase the resource base and also the level of confidence in the resource to the indicated and/or measured categories.

2)

Complete a metallurgical program to enhance the metallurgical data.

3)

Commence a Preliminary Assessment Study on the mineralized zones within the Robertson Property to determine which of the zones have the greater potential for viability. The zones can then be prioritized for development.

Beacon Hill recommended the following drilling on the Core Claims:

Phase I:52 RC holes ranging in depth from 500 ft to 1,200 ft and totaling 37,600 ft, to focus on:

  • 39A Zone:Ten holes totaling 8,400 ft drilled along the southeast and northeast margins of the zone to test for additional high-grade mineralization.
  • Distal Zone:Ten holes totaling 12,000 ft drilled in the Distal Zone, which remains open for discovery of high- grade mineralization in all directions.
  • Altenburg Hill/South Porphyry Area:Twenty holes totaling 10,000 ft as infill and offset drilling on the northeast flank of Altenburg Hill and in the gravel- covered area south of the Porphyry Zone.
  • Triplet Gulch:Twelve wide-spaced RC holes totaling 7,200 ft to test potential continuity and grade of inferred mineralization.

Phase II:should consist of 21 diamond core holes (HQ diameter) ranging from 300-ft to 1,000-ft-deep and totaling 11,900 ft. The purpose of core drilling is to provide geological data on the controls of mineralization, acquire geotechnical data (RQD and specific gravity), confirm grade and continuity and provide material for metallurgical testing. Drilling has been recommended as follows:

  • 39A Zone:Six “twin” core holes totaling 5,000 ft focused in areas of higher grade mineralization.
  • Distal Zone:Four pre-collared “twin” core holes totaling 2,400 ft drilled to confirm grade and geological controls.
  • Altenburg Hill/South Porphyry Area:Six (or more) “twin” core holes totaling 3,000 ft to provide ore-grade oxide mineralization for metallurgical studies and confirm the grade and continuity of mineralization.
  • Gold Pan Zone:Five shallow “twin” core holes totaling 1,500 ft drilled mainly to provide ore-grade oxide mineralization for metallurgical studies and to confirm grade, continuity and geological controls for mineralization.

     Mr. Garth D. Kirkham, P.Geo., and Mr. Peter Stokes, P.Eng., of Beacon Hill and Mr. Robert McCusker, Consultant Geologist and Project Manager, are responsible for preparing the report and are “qualified persons” in accordance with NI 43-101. Messrs Kirkham, Stokes and McCusker are independent of the Company as defined by NI 43-101.

     Deep drilling in 2007 encountered Carlin-type geochemistry including gold in the important lower plate host rocks for Carlin-type structure beneath the Roberts Mountains thrust fault. The gold intercepts indicate a Carlin type system in Lower Plate rocks on a western part of the property.

Follow up mapping, rock sampling and infill gravity surveys in 2008 lead to the Company’s identification of a new lower plate target zone that extends from the coral deep hole, 2 km to the south.  The West Deep Carlin-type target adds significant discovery potential to the Robertson Property for a world-class gold deposit.  The target zone lies north of the Pipeline Mine open pit along a projected mineralized fault and fracture system that controls gold within that deposit.  Considerably more drilling on the Robertson West Deep target is warranted.  While the Company would prefer to continue drilling and expanding these targets, in 2009, the Company must wait and see what unfolds in the equity markets and its ability to raise additional exploration capital.  In addition, the Company continuesconti nues to seek joint venture partners for a proposed deep drilling program to follow up the successful results from the 2007 drilling program which intersected enormous gold values in the Lower Plate limestone sequence at the Robertson Property.

14



In February 2008, the Company received the final NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource Estimate for the Robertson Property, Lander County, Nevada report dated January 27, 2008, prepared by Beacon Hill and updated in October 2009. The original estimate, based on a gold price of US$600 per ounce in 2008, raises the Robertson Property inferred mineral resource to 91.2 million tons with an average grade of 0.0253 oz Au/ton and containing over 2.3 million ounces of gold, an increase of 110% over the previous NI 43-101 estimate from April 2006 (22.9 million tons averaging 0.031 oz Au/ton of measured and indicated mineral resources and 9.4 million tons at 0.046 oz Au/ton of inferred mineral resources). In October 2009, it was decided that US$850 per ounce should be used at this time to more accurately represent the resources that may be reasonably expected to be extracted. Based on this lower gold cut-off value of 0.0106 oz Au/ton, the inferred mineral resources at Robertson increased to 178.9 million tons at a grade of 0.0189 oz Au/ton and containing 3.4 million ounces, which is a 47% increase over the figure reported in the 2008 report.
19


In 2008, the Company commissioned Beacon Hill to not only update the Robertson resource estimate but to also outline a program for continued development of the Core Claims in 2008 and beyond. Beacon Hill recommended a three-pronged development approach:

       1)  
Additional exploratory and definition drilling to increase the resource base and the level of confidence in the resource to the indicated and/or measured categories.
       2)  
Complete a metallurgical program to enhance the metallurgical data.
       3)  
Commence a Preliminary Assessment Study on the mineralized zones within the Robertson Property to determine which of the zones have the greater potential for viability.

Beacon Hill recommended the following drilling on the Core Claims:

Phase I: 52 RC holes ranging in depth from 500 feet to 1,200 feet and totaling 37,600 feet, to focus on:

       ·  
39A Zone: Ten holes totaling 8,400 feet drilled along the southeast and northeast margins of the zone to test for additional high-grade mineralization.
       ·  
Distal Zone: Ten holes totaling 12,000 feet drilled in the Distal Zone, which remains open for discovery of high-grade mineralization in all directions.
       ·  
Altenburg Hill/South Porphyry Area: Twenty holes totaling 10,000 feet as infill and offset drilling on the northeast flank of Altenburg Hill and in the gravel- covered area south of the Porphyry Zone.
       ·  
Triplet Gulch: Twelve wide-spaced RC holes totaling 7,200 feet to test potential continuity and grade of inferred mineralization.

Phase II: should consist of 21 diamond core holes (HQ diameter) ranging from 300 feet to 1,000 feet-deep and totaling 11,900 feet. The purpose of core drilling is to provide geological data on the controls of mineralization, acquire geotechnical data (RQD and specific gravity), confirm grade and continuity and provide material for metallurgical testing. Drilling has been recommended as follows:

       ·  
39A Zone: Six “twin” core holes totaling 5,000 feet focused in areas of higher grade mineralization.
       ·  
Distal Zone: Four pre-collared “twin” core holes totaling 2,400 feet drilled to confirm grade and geological controls.
       ·  
Altenburg Hill/South Porphyry Area: Six (or more) “twin” core holes totaling 3,000 feet to provide ore-grade oxide mineralization for metallurgical studies and confirm the grade and continuity of mineralization.
       ·  
Gold Pan Zone: Five shallow “twin” core holes totaling 1,500 feet drilled mainly to provide ore-grade oxide mineralization for metallurgical studies and to confirm grade, continuity and geological controls for mineralization.

In 2008, the Company entered into a contract for 37,600 feet of reverse circulation drilling on Robertson Property. The agreement, signed with Lang Exploratory Drilling of Salt Lake City, Utah, began in April following permit approval from the BLM.  Robert McCusker, a Consulting Geologist, supervised the drill program as a “qualified person” for NI 43-101.

In September 2008, the Company completed a Reverse Circulationits reverse circulation drilling program at the Robertson Property.  The program totaled 22,835 ftfeet of drilling in 33 vertical holes which ranged in depth from 500 to 1200 ft.feet.  The holes were located on the Altenburg Hill, South Porphyry, 39A and Distal zones in order to increase the gold resource in these zones. Hole locations can be viewed
20


Both Phase I and Phase II were aimed at expanding and upgrading the Robertson inferred resource. The updated resource was calculated from work completed in maps2006 and 2007. With the 2008 drilling, the Company hoped to upgrade a significant portion of the inferred resources into the measured and indicated categories.

The planned 21 diamond drill holes of Phase II ranged from 300 to 1,000 feet in depth. Phase II drilling would:
1) provide geological data on our website at www.coralgold.com. The information containedthe controls of mineralization;
2) provide geotechnical data for RQD (“Rock Quality Designation”) and specific gravity;
3) help confirm grade and continuity; and
4) provide material for metallurgical testing.

To help derive exploration priorities to expand the current resource with the 2008 drilling campaign, a series of in-house, draft open pit shapes had been modeled around the 2008 NI 43-101 compliant inferred resource.

During the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008, the Company purchased 100% interest in the 72 claims comprising the Fanny Komp/Elwood Wright lease which forms part of the core area of the Robertson Property for US$250,000.

In February 2010, the Company announced its 2010 Work Plan and Budget.  The US$1.5 million program, aimed at advancing the Robertson Property towards a Preliminary Economic Assessment Report. The Company will focus on upgrading near-surface oxide resources in the Gold Pan, Altenburg Hill and Porphyry Deposits to the measured and indicated categories. All three deposits are located within the property’s 100% owned Core Claims area.

In April 2010, SRK Consulting (US) Inc. (“SRK Consulting”), environmental compliance and permitting consultants, submitted an amended Plan of Operations to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”).

This amendment to the Plan of Operations if approved will permit the Company to drill 36 core holes and 22 Reverse Circulation (“RC”) holes on the Gold Pan, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill and Triplet Gulch Zones.

The 36 core holes will allow comparison of assays from core holes with previous reverse circulation holes.  They will also provide material for column leach tests (to establish the amount of recoverable gold in the zones) and also specific gravity tests to accurately determine potentially mineable tonnages.

In addition the Company will drill a further 10 RC holes in the zone between Porphyry and Altenburg Hill to determine continuity between the zones.  The Company will also drill 12 RC holes on the Triplet Gulch Zone.

Beacon Hill is updating the geostatistical computer block model by incorporating results from the 2008 reverse circulation drilling.  The program of drilling and metallurgical test work planned for 2010 has been designed in consultation with Beacon Hill. This program is intended to increase confidence in the continuity of near-surface (oxide) mineralization in the inferred resource, estimated to contain of 87 million tons grading 0.017 oz Au/ton (0.583 g/t) at a cut-off grade of 0.0106 oz Au/ton. Total contained gold in the Gold Pan, Altenburg Hill and Porphyry mineralized zones is estimated to be 1.5 million ounces.
21


The remaining deeper resources in the Distal and 39A inferred resources will not be evaluated by the 2010 program.

Reclamation Activities

The Company spent approximately $176,672 on reclamation and maintenance in fiscal 2009 on the Robertson Property and $Nil during fiscal 2010.   The Company is reclaiming past mining and exploration related disturbances to public lands as required by the BLM and the NDEP.

In August 2008, SRK Consulting prepared an “Aerial Survey Ground Truthing and Revised Cost Estimate” Report for the Company, which following amendments and revisions was submitted to the BLM and NDEP in October 2008. The report outlined and updated results of reclamation done by the Company at the Robertson Property up to 2008.

The BLM and NDEP replied with required changes and updates in April 2009 and a revised “Aerial Survey Ground Truthing and Revised Cost Estimate” was prepared by SRK Consulting on June 10, 2009 and submitted to the BLM and NDEP.  As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has not received acceptance of the report.

In other reclamation activity, the Company resolved confusion concerning disturbance at Mill Gulch (in the Robertson Core area) and at the Company’s website doesJDN claims in the Hilltop area.  The BLM agreed in July 2008 that the Company is not responsible for the land disturbance at Mill Gulch.  The disturbance was caused by placer gold mining activity before the Company’s involvement at Robertson.

In the Try/View area of the Robertson Property, the Company renewed the Notice of Intent to allow further deep drilling.

In the core area of the Robertson Property, the Company also submitted a new “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan” and technical report which was approved by the BLM and NDEP in June 2009.

In addition the Company has authorized SRK Consulting to prepare:

(a) Comprehensive Permit, List and Schedules (a diary of permitting requirements); and

(b) memo of existing reclamation status and planning for further reclamation.

The Company completed certain reclamation activities as required by the BLM, thereby during the year ended January 31, 2010, the bond was reduced by US$7,905. As at January 31, 2010, the Company has a reclamation deposit of US$382,482 as required by the BLM.
22


Environmental Liabilities

In 1988-89, the Company operated a small open pit gold mining operation and heap leach facility on the Robertson Property.  The resulting disturbances include three small open pit mines, waste dumps, haul roads, drill roads, open drill holes, and a 350,000 ton heap leach facility and related recovery plant.  In 1994, a reclamation plan was prepared by Amax and submitted to the Battle Mountain office of the BLM.  The cost to perform the reclamation of the Robertson mine site was estimated at that time to be US$2,000,000.  In 2001, the Company began reclamation activities which were accelerated in 2002, with the recontouring of waste dumps, reclamation of the leach pad, haul roads and the filling of all open drill holes.  As a result of this activity, in June 2003, the BLM reduced the bo nding requirements for the project to US$406,000.

In March 2003, on behalf of the Company, SRK Consulting submitted a final plan for permanent closure with the BLM and NDEP.  The closure plan was approved by both agencies.  As a result of this work, during 2004 the BLM lowered the bonding requirements to $226,205.  The Company currently maintains a required performance bond with the Nevada State Office of the BLM in the amount of US$382,482.  The Company is working with the BLM and the United States Department of Interior in efforts to further reduce the bond.

Permitting

In 2002, the Company submitted and was granted a five year renewal of Water Pollution Control Permit (NEV60035) by the NDEP for the Robertson Property.  This permit is now renewed annually and reports are submitted quarterly. In addition, the Company has a Stormwater Pollution Control Permit which is also renewed annually.

The Company continues to conduct reclamation and exploration activities under a Plan of Operation (NV067688) approved in 1989 by the BLM. The Plan of Operation was updated in 2007.

During 2000 through 2003, no exploration activity was conducted on the Robertson Property; however, during that period a significant amount of surface reclamation was completed on the property.  As a result, any new exploration activities in reclaimed areas will require submission and approval of an Amendment to the Plan of Operation.  Additionally, the National Historic Preservation Act requires that all operators on public lands conduct an archeological survey of the proposed sites of new disturbance.  Much of the Robertson Property has been previously cleared under various surveys conducted by Amax.  Recent and planned future exploration activities by the Company have moved outside the area covered by previous archeological surveys. 0; It is possible that future exploration will experience delays in receiving approval because additional surveys will be required by state and federal agencies.

Geological Setting

Geologically, the Robertson Property consists of a series of relatively flat-lying, vertically stacked thrust sheets that form part of this Annualthe Roberts Mountain allochthon, which is composed of siliciclastic rocks of Ordovician through Devonian age.  The district is dominated by a very thick sequence of middle to late Devonian Slaven Chert composed mainly of argillite, chert, lesser siltstone and shale, and minor intermediate volcanic rocks.  Structurally overlying the Slaven Chert along the north and east sides of the district are a sequence of rusty brown weathering siltstone, sandstone and very minor limestone of the Silurian Elder Sandstone.

Intruding the thick Paleozoic sequence is an elliptical-shaped, composite granodiorite stock (or lacolith) of Eocene age.  The orientation of the principal axis of the stock is approximately east-west.  Associated with it are numerous dikes, sills and plugs that vary in composition from diorite, the earliest known intrusion, to rhyolite, the latest.  Most of the identified gold resources, including the Porphyry, Gold Pan and 39A zones, lie along or near the northern contact of the composite stock.  A series of narrow and laterally continuous (up to 1,600 feet) intrusive “pebble” dikes extend northward from the northern contact of the granodiorite stock.  Near contacts with the Tertiary intrusions, many of the sedimentary and volcanic rocks, and early phases of the stock, ha ve undergone significant thermal metamorphism, intense recrystallization, bleaching and pervasive metasomatism.  Many of these rocks have been converted to layered sequences of biotite, “quartz” and calc-silicate hornfels, marble, exoskarn and endoskarn.
23


Mineralization at the Robertson Property is strongly controlled by a system of low and high-angle faults and related fracture zones.  Less commonly, brecciation associated with axial plane shear zones developed in isoclinal folds are also important hosts for mineralization, locally.  Although individual structures host ore-grade gold, higher grades commonly occur where one or more structures intersect.

Deposit Types and Mineralization

The Company has been focusing its exploration activities on four zones localized along the northern and eastern contacts of the Tenabo stock forming the general east-west trend, the Porphyry, Gold Pan, Altenburg Hill and 39A zones.  The Porphyry, Gold Pan and Altenburg Hill zones occur in highly fractured hornfels and skarn units at the contact of the granodiorite stock, whereas the 39A zone is localized at the intersection of two high-angle faults in retrograde-altered hornfels.

The following is a summary of the main minerals identified at the Robertson Property:

Native goldNative silverElectrumPyrite
PyrrhotiteMarcasiteArsenopyriteStibnite
ChalcopyriteSphaleriteGalenaBournonite
AcanthiteLoellingiteGersdorffiteTetradymite
PetziteHessiteHedleyiteTellurobismuthite
AltaiteTetrahedriteBorniteChalcocite
CovelliteDigeniteNative copperCuprite
ChysocollaAzuriteGoethiteMagnetite
HematiteIllmeniteScorodite

Mineral Resource Estimates

In 2007, Beacon Hill was commissioned by the Company to update the resource estimate on the Robertson Property.  The purpose of the study was to incorporate additional drilling completed in 2006 in an updated resource estimate and to establish a program for continued development and provide a basis for a subsequent Technical Report.

     Robert McCusker, Consultant Geologist supervised The final NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resource Estimate for the drill programsRobertson Property, Lander County, Nevada report was received by the Company in February 2008. The new estimate, based on a gold price of US$600 per ounce, raised the Robertson Property inferred resource to over 2.3 million ounces of gold, an increase of 110% over the previous NI 43-101 estimate from April 2006. A portion of the oxide resources are locally exposed at the surfac e and are potentially in an open pit mining configuration. Some of the new resources remain open to expansion on strike and at depth.

24


In October 2009, Coral received the revised resources for the Robertson Property from Beacon Hill utilizing lower cut-off grades to reflect the positive movement in the price of gold over the last three years. These revised values are based on the NI 43-101 Technical Report titled Mineral Resource Estimate for the Robertson Property, Lander County, Nevada prepared by Beacon Hill in January 2008. The original estimate was based on a gold price of US$600 per ounce, a conservative estimate of gold prices in 2007. The 2008 report estimated the inferred mineral resources for the Robertson property to be 91.2 million tons averaging 0.0253 oz Au/ton and containing over 2.3 million ounces of gold. Gold prices over the last three years have been significantly higher than US$600.  60;Based on more reasonable gold prices and to more closely reflect the rolling average gold price for the preceding three years, it was decided that a price of US$850 per ounce should be used. Based on a gold cut-off value of 0.0106 oz Au/ton, the inferred mineral resource at Robertson increased to 178.9 million tons averaging 0.0189 oz Au/ton and containing nearly 3.4 million ounces, a 47% increase over the figure reported in 2008.  It should be noted that operating costs used to calculate the new cut-off grade may not accurately reflect actual operating costs and could adversely affect the resource estimate.

The zones included in the Beacon Hill estimate are located within the Robertson’s Core area. The Company’s other claim blocks, including Norma Sass, Lander Ranch, Ruf, Blue Nugget and the Excluded claims (joint ventured with Barrick Cortez Gold Mines), were not part of the estimate.

Beacon Hill reported the following updated resource estimate using 0.0106 Au opt cut-off:

ZoneTonsOunces per TonOunces of Au
Distal        13,310,4510.0287      382,010
39A        38,945,6980.0228      887,962
South Zone         9,993,8530.0209      208,872
Outside         5,422,1310.0156        84,585
Gold Pan Oxide        12,566,5990.02      251,332
Altenburg Hill Oxide        12,873,9760.0152      195,684
Porphyry Oxide        39,049,1820.0167      652,121
Gold Pan Sulphide        32,524,5920.0154      500,879
Altenburg Hill Sulphide         1,701,8440.014        23,826
Porphyry Sulphide        12,535,8610.0158      198,067
    
TOTAL      178,924,1880.0189    3,381,667

25

Resource estimate parameters:
·  Cut-off grade was calculated on the basis of US$850/oz Au and 70% Au recovery.
·  The 0.0106 ozAu/ton cut-off grade utilized to report the resource was derived from a mining cost of US$1.02/ton, process cost of US$5.00/ton and waste cost of US$1.14/ton.
·  The mineral resources in the table above were estimated using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves.
·  The database comprised a total of 1,160 drill holes, 533,453 feet (162,638 metres) of drilling and 101,757 gold assays.
·  The inferred resource covers 6 distinct and separate areas; Distal, 39A, Gold Pan, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill, Southern Area and then all remaining blocks outside these areas that warrant inclusion as an inferred resource. In addition, Gold Pan, Porphyry and Altenburg Hill were separated into oxide and sulphide zones for analysis and modeling.
·  An interpreted mineralized envelope was modeled into a solid in MineSight 3D™, with six area mineralized zones and then separated into oxide and sulphide zones.
·  Block dimensions of 25 feet (7.6 m) North, 25 feet (7.6 m) East and 20 feet (6 m) vertically.
·  Grade interpolation of 20 foot (6 m) composites.
·  Composites greater than 0.75 ozAu/ton limited in influence to 100 feet (30.5 m).
·  Tonnage estimates are based on 200 bulk historic density measurements carried out by previous operators. These were assigned to each block by zone. The resources are categorized as inferred since the amount and distribution of bulk tonnage factor data is sparse.

In an effort to offer perspective and comparison, the following table lists the Robertson Deposit Resources for all zones at varying cut-off grades and corresponding metal prices. Note that as of the date of the press release on October 9, 2009, the gold price was at a “Qualified Person” forrecord high of US$1,050 per ounce.

 Cut-off Grade oz Au/tonAu PriceTonAu Ounce per TonAu Ounces
 0.0091000   259,786,8970.016   4,156,590
 0.0095950   215,146,5260.0174   3,743,550
 0.0106850   178,924,1880.0189   3,381,667
 0.012750   149,133,2030.0205   3,057,231
 0.0129700   125,174,1860.0221   2,766,350
 0.015600     91,284,8400.0253   2,309,506

26

The mineral resources in the table above were estimated using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves.

This resource is compliant with NI 43-101.


Data Used for Estimate

A total of 1,204 drill holes were supplied for the Robertson Property in Lander County, Nevada which are the combined drill holes for the Gold Pan, 39A, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill and Lower Triplet Gulch zones in addition to areas that have drilling but lie outside the main areas of interest. The drill holes within the database included collars, downhole surveys, assays, and lithology.

Solids models of the main ore zones within the Robertson Deposit were created that encompass the Gold Pan, 39A, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill, Distal and Triplet Gulch deposit areas. The ore zones to be included within the solids model and then to be used for constraining the interpolation procedure are split into an Oxide Zone and a Sulphide Zone where sufficient data existed to do so which included the Gold Pan, 39A, Porphyry and Altenburg Hill areas. Due to its depth, the Distal zone is considered to be sulphide material.

Approximately 200 historic core samples were analyzed for dry bulk density using the volume displacement method. Densities for both ore and waste are primarily related to lithology, argillization, calc-silicate content and sulfide content. The average density for country rock was determined to be 12.2 cu ft/ton and 15.5 cu ft/ton for alluvium (2 determinations). These are historic determinations, which appear to be located for the most part, within the Porphyry Zone. The relative scarcity of specific gravity data is one reason cited by Beacon Hill for the resources being categorized as inferred. One objective of the proposed 2010 core drilling program is to provide suitable material for additional specific gravity determinations.

Estimation Method

The estimation plan includes the following items:

       ·  
Storage of the mineralized zone code and percentage of mineralization.
       ·  
Application of density based on limited SG measurements.
       ·  
Estimation of the grades for Au using ordinary kriging.
       ·  
Ellipsoid orientation was orthogonal and ranges were set to 300 feet in the northing and easting whilst 200 feet in elevation.

The estimation strategy employed a minimum of four composites and a maximum of 15 with a maximum of two from any one drillhole.

Also, an octant search was used as it aids in declustering the estimate. This means that it helps to avoid over-influence of individual drill holes or sectors being overly informed, avoiding the use of samples that clustered together and thereby redundant. The maximum number of composites allowed in any one octant was two.
27


Proposed Exploration

The Company believes that there is a potential for discovery of additional mineral resources on the Robertson Property.  The Company plans to continue to explore the Robertson Property or seek third party partners for further exploration.

(ii)   Carve-Out Claims, Nevada, U.S.A.

Under the terms of an Exploration and Mining Venture Agreement dated July 11, 1997, Barrick, formerly Placer, holds an undivided 61% interest and the Company has a 39% interest carried to production in the Carve-Out Claims.

Beginning in 1997 and continuing through 1998, Cortez conducted a series of exploratory drilling programs on the Carve-Out Claims with limited success.   In 2002, the Company conducted a drilling program on the Carve-Out Claims with follow-up drilling in the immediate vicinity of existing drill holes with mixed results. To date, no significant mineral resources have been discovered on the Carve-Out Claims. However, the wide-space deep drilling has established the presence of scattered significant gold values, anomalous levels of Carlin-type trace elements, key structural components and the occurrence of a preferred host strata.

The Company plans to rely on Cortez to further explore the property for mineral resources.

There is no underground or surface plant or equipment located on the Carve-Out Claims, nor any known body of commercial ore.

No further work on the Carve-Out Claims is proposed at this time.

(iii)    Norma Sass and Ruf Claims, – Operations and Activities

Nevada, U.S.A


Effective December 31, 1999, the Company and Levon Resources Ltd., referred to as “Levon” (“Levon”), entered into a fourth amending agreement whereby Levon could earn an undivided 50% interest in the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims upon completion of certain terms.  This agreement was further amended effective December 31, 2001 (but signed on October 3, 2002), whereby Levon was transferred a 33.3% interest in the Company’s interest in the Norma Sass  and Ruf claims, in consideration of 300,000 common shares of Levon previously issued to the Company and the prior payment of $350,294 for exploration work.  The Company currently owns a 66.6% interest in the Norma Sass and Ruf claims (subject to certain royalties to underlying property owners, as described below), following the execution of the December 2001 fifth amendingamendi ng agreement with Levon.

     On December 4, 2002, the Company granted an option to acquire 33.3% of the Company’s interest in the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims to Goldfranchise Corporation, referred to as “Goldfranchise”. In order to earn the interest, Goldfranchise was required to: (a) pay the Company US$38,391.50, which has been received by the Company; (b) incur a minimum of US$300,000 in exploration work on the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims, of which US$100,000 had to be incurred on or before December 4, 2003, and the balance of US$200,000 incurred on or before December 4, 2004; and (c) pay the Company 33.3% of all annual land fees, taxes, advance royalties required to keep the claims in good standing, until Goldfranchise has exercised the option. Goldfranchise failed to incur the exploration work required or to pay the Company 33.3% of all annual land fees, taxes and advance royalties under the option, and the option has since been terminated.


In January 2005, the Company announced the formation of an exploration agreement with Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited referred to as “Agnico-Eagle”(“Agnico-Eagle”).  The agreement covered ourthe Norma Sass, Blue Nugget and Lander Ranch claims. The Norma Sass agreement also included ourthe partnership with Levon.  Under the agreement, Agnico-Eagle could earn a 51% interest in the Norma Sass, Blue Nugget and Lander Ranch claims by completing at least 45,000 feet of exploration drilling and paying certain advance royalties.

28


Agnico-Eagle mobilized a reverse circulation drill supplied by Lang Exploratory Drilling of Elko, Nevada to the Norma Sass property on May 15, 2006.  Drilling commenced on the Lander Ranch target area and Agnico-Eagle drilled 15,000 ft.feet in 12 to 15 holes on the Norma Sass and related properties.  In February 2007, Agnico-Eagle notified the Company that it would not be continuing its option on the Company’s Norma Sass, Lander Ranch and Blue Nugget properties because of other corporate priorities. The Company was pleased with the work done by Agnico-Eagle as they successfully showed depths to the lower plate sequence across the Norma Sass ground and extended the area of gold mineralization at Lander Ranch.

     In September 2008, the Company entered into an exploration, development and mine operating agreement (the “Agreement”) with Barrick Gold Exploration Inc. (“Barrick”), wherein Barrick was granted the option to acquire up to a 75% interest in the Company’s and Levon’s interests in the Norma Sass Property, Nevada, consisting of 36 unpatented mining claims.

     Barrick may earn a 60% interest by incurring total exploration expenditures of at least US$3 million in annual installments by December 31, 2014. Barrick may earn an additional 10% (for an aggregate interest of 70%) by incurring an additional US$1.5 million by December 31, 2015. Barrick may earn an additional 5% (for an aggregate interest of 75%) by carrying the Company and Levon through to commercial production.

15


     Alternatively, at the time of earning either its 60% or 70% interest, Barrick may be given the option to buy-out the Company’s and Levon’s joint interest by paying US$6 million and granting them a 2% net smelter returns royalty.

     In May 2009, Barrick announced that plans are underway to do target delineation work in the second quarter followed by deep drilling in the third quarter on the Norma Sass property, Cortez Gold Trend, Nevada. Norma Sass is a 36-claim property immediately west of the Pipeline Mine open pit. Norma Sass was optioned to Barrick as disclosed above.

     Norma Sass’ proximity to Pipeline, offers the deep discovery potential Barrick is pursuing. They have completely remapped and reinterpreted the Pipeline open pit geology since their acquisition of Placer Dome, and have a new stratigraphic model for the host rocks and structural setting of the gold deposit.

     Barrick has notified the Company that they will commence the drilling of the planned holes in September 2009.

June Claims

     The Company announced the completion of a mineral lease with option to purchase agreement to explore, develop, and exploit six lode mining claims located in Lander County, State of Nevada (the “June Claims”). The June Claims are adjacent to the Company’s View Claims in the northwest section of its Robertson Property. The agreement is for an initial term of 4 years in consideration of the payment of an annual rent of US$25,000, renewable in successive four year terms, provided that the rent will increase by US$5,000 every four years. The property is subject to a royalty charge of 3% of net smelter returns (“NSR”), subject to the Company’s exclusive right to purchase the NSR for US$1,000,000 per percentage point upon notice to the Lessors. The Company also has the exclusive right to purchase the property, subject to the NSR, for US $1,000,000 upon notice to the Lessors.

Reclamation Activities

     The Company spent approximately $176,672 on reclamation and maintenance in fiscal 2009 on the Robertson Property. The Company is reclaiming past mining and exploration related disturbances to public lands as required by the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (“NDEP”).

     In August 2008, SRK Consulting prepared an “Aerial Survey Ground Truthing and Revised Cost Estimate” Report for the Company, which following amendments and revisions was submitted to the BLM and NDEP in October 2008.

     The report outlined and updated results of reclamation done by the Company at the Robertson Property up to 2008.

     The BLM and NDEP replied with required changes and updates in March/April 2009 and a revised “Aerial Survey Ground Truthing and Revised Cost Estimate” was prepared by SRK Consulting on June 10, 2009 and submitted to the BLM and NDEP. The Company is awaiting acceptance of the report.

     In other reclamation activity, The Company resolved confusion concerning disturbance at Mill Gulch (in the Robertson Core area) and at the Company’s JDN claims in the Hilltop area. The BLM agreed in July 2008 that the Company is not responsible for the land disturbance at Mill Gulch. The disturbance was caused by placer gold mining activity before the Company’s involvement at Robertson.

     In the Try/View area of the Robertson Property the Company renewed the Notice of Intent to allow further deep drilling. The bond covering this area was increased to approximately $37,000.

     In the core area of the Robertson Property, the Company also submitted a new “Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan” and technical report which was approved by the BLM and NDEP in June 2009.

16


     In addition the Company has authorized SRK Consulting to prepare:

     (a) Comprehensive Permit, List and Schedules (a diary of permitting requirements); and

     (b) memo of existing reclamation status and planning for further reclamation.

     During the year ended January 31, 2009, additional planned exploration activities were approved by the BLM. Accordingly, the BLM increased the amount of the required reclamation deposit to US$389,360.

Competition

     The mining industry in which the Company is engaged is highly competitive. Competitors include well-capitalized mining companies, independent mining companies and other companies having financial and other resources far greater than those of the Company. The companies compete with other mining companies in connection with the acquisition of gold and other precious metal properties. In general, properties with a higher grade of recoverable mineral and/or which are more readily minable afford the owners a competitive advantage in that the cost of production of the final mineral product is lower. Thus, a degree of competition exists between those engaged in the mining industries to acquire the most valuable properties. As a result, the Company may eventually be unable to acquire attractive gold mining properties.

Dependence on Customers and Suppliers

     The Company is not dependent upon a single or few customers or suppliers for revenues or its operations.

Government Regulation

     We are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations including environmental laws and regulations. Environmental regulations impose, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the generation, handling, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and waste and in connection with spills, releases and emissions of various substances to the environment. Environmental regulation also requires that facility sites and other properties associated with our operations be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. In addition, certain types of operations, including exploration and development projects and changes to certain existing projects, may require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments or permit applications. Compliance with environmental regulation can require significant expenditures, including expenditures for clean up costs and damages arising out of contaminated properties and failure to comply with environmental regulations may result in the imposition of fines and penalties. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with such laws and regulations. However, such laws and regulations may change in the future in a manner which will increase the burden and cost of compliance.

     Certain laws and governmental regulations may impose liability on us for personal injuries, clean-up costs, environmental damages and property damages, as well as administrative, civil and criminal penalties. We maintain limited insurance coverage for sudden and accidental environmental damages, but do not maintain insurance coverage for the full potential liability that could be caused by sudden and accidental environmental damage. Accordingly, we may be subject to liability or may be required to cease production from properties in the event of such damages.

Environmental Regulations

     The Company’s exploration programs in Nevada and California are subject to state and federal regulations regarding environmental considerations. All operations involving the exploration for the production of minerals are subject to existing laws and regulations relating to exploration procedures, safety precautions, employee health and safety, air quality standards, pollution of streams and fresh water sources, odor, noise, dust and other environmental protection controls adopted by federal, state and local governmental authorities as well as the rights of adjoining property owners. The Company may be required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the effect or impact that any proposed exploration for or production of minerals may have upon the environment.

17


All requirements imposed by any such authorities may be costly, time consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations. Future legislation may significantly emphasize the protection of the environment, and, as a consequence, the activities of the Company may be more closely regulated to further the cause of environmental protection. Such legislation, as well as further interpretation of existing laws in the United States, may require substantial increases in equipment and operating costs to the Company and delays, interruptions, or a termination of operations, the extent of which cannot be predicted. Environmental problems known to exist at this time in the United States may not be in compliance with regulations that may come into existence in the future. This may have a substantial impact upon the capital expenditures required of the Company in order to deal with such problem and could substantially reduce earnings. At the present time, the Company’s exploration activities in Nevada are in compliance with all known environmental requirements.

     The regulatory bodies that directly regulate the Company’s activities are the Bureau of Land Management (Federal) and the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (State).

C. Organizational Structure

     The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Coral Energy Corporation of California, a California corporation which holds title to the Company’s California property, and Coral Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation, which holds title to the Company’s mining claims located in Nevada. In the 2006 fiscal year, the Company completed the purchase of 1,391,860 shares, representing 98.49% of the issued shares, of Marcus, a Nevada Corporation that owns the Marcus mining claims, consisting of 39 unpatented lode claims and two placer claims, and which comprise a portion of the Company’s Robertson Property.

D. Property, Plant and Equipment

     Presently, the Company is an “exploration stage company”, as all of the Company’s properties are currently in the exploratory stage of development. In order to determine if a commercially viable mineral deposit exists in any of the Company’s properties, further geological work will need to be done and a final evaluation based upon the results obtained to conclude economic and legal feasibility.

     The Company’s primary focus has been on the Robertson Mining Claims, in Nevada, United States.

Robertson Mining Claims, Nevada, U.S.A.

     The Robertson Mining Claims are located in Crescent Valley, Nevada on the western flanks of the Shoshone Range, 28 miles to the southeast of Battle Mountain, Nevada, which lies some 230 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. The Robertson Mining Claims comprise approximately 11,000 acres in the Bullion Mining District, Lander County, Nevada, and currently include 724 unpatented and patented lode and placer mining claims. The Robertson Mining Claims comprise three separate claim groups known as: (i) the Core Claims; (ii) the Carve Out Claims, and (iii) the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims. as described more particularly below.

     These mining claims have been acquired over a period of several years from different sources. The entire Robertson Mining Claims are subject to a 3% net smelter royalty to Geomex Development Eighth Partnership, referred to as “Geomex 8”, which royalty shall cease at such time as the sum of US$1,250,000 has been paid to Geomex 8, and various mining leases requiring minimum annual advanced royalties ranging from 2% to 8% of net smelter returns.

     There is no underground or surface plant or equipment located on the Robertson Mining Claims.

18



19



20


(i) Robertson Property

     The Robertson Property is the subject of three technical reports dated January 15, 2004, April 25, 2006 and January 27, 2008. The first two technical reports were prepared by Robert McCusker, P.Geol. in accordance with NI 43-101, which we refer to as the “McCusker Reports”. The third and most recent report was prepared by Beacon Hill of Vancouver, British Columbia referred hereinto as the “Beacon Hill Report”. The zones included in the Beacon Hill estimate are located within the Robertson’s Core claims only. The Company’s other Claim blocks, including Norma Sass, Lander Ranch, Ruf, Blue Nugget and the Excluded claims (joint ventured with Cortez Gold Mines), were not part of the estimate.

Property Description and Location

     The Robertson Property is an advanced-stage gold exploration project located in eastern Lander County, Nevada, 60 miles southwest of Elko. Coral Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of Coral Gold Resources Limited of Vancouver, B.C. acquired control of the Robertson Property in 1986. The core property consists of 556 unpatented federal lode claims, mill sites, placer claims and nine patented lode claims covering over 8,500 acres of public lands administered by the BLM. The Company is record owner of 495 claims and controls an additional 61 claims through a series of mineral leases and option agreements.

     In 2001, a boundary agreement between the Company and Cortez resolved claim boundary overlaps and seniority issues along the east and south sides of the Robertson claim block. This agreement required both parties to amend and/or abandon certain claims in order to achieve the agreed upon boundary. This was completed during the 2002-2003 assessment year.

     Approximately 61 of the 495 of the claims that comprise the Robertson Property are controlled by the Company through six mining leases and option agreements. The Core Claims held by the Company under lease or option agreements require minimum advance royalty payments and production royalties in the event of production. Total annual payments for the various leases and minimum advance royalties are US$36,000.

     A summary compilation of the terms of these agreements are presented in the table below:

Mining Lease and Option Agreements

Advance
Number ofProductionRoyalty
Company/DateClaimsOption PaymentRoyaltyPayment
Tenabo Gold Mining Co.
Nov. 30, 197513$2M8% NSR$12,000/yr
Northern Nevada Au, Inc.
Sept. 30, 198612$ -4% GSR$9,600/yr
Albany Gold Corp.
(Geomex)All$1.25M3% NSRNil
Mauzy, et al
Apr. 21, 198936$1.5M2% NSR$14,400/yr

     Annual federal rental fees of US$81,760, payable to the BLM, and Notice of Intent to Hold Mining Claims have been filed for the 2009-2010 assessment year.

Environmental Liabilities

     In 1988-89, the Company operated a small open pit gold mining operation and heap leach facility on the Robertson Property. The resulting disturbances include three small open pit mines, waste dumps, haul roads, drill roads, open drill holes, and a 350,000 ton heap leach facility and related recovery plant. In 1994, a reclamation plan was prepared by Amax Gold Exploration Inc., referred to as “Amax”, and submitted to the Battle Mountain office of the BLM.

21


The cost to perform the reclamation of the Robertson mine site was estimated at that time to be US$2,000,000. In 2001, the Company began reclamation activities which were accelerated in 2002, with the recontouring of waste dumps, reclamation of the leach pad, haul roads and the filling of all open drill holes. As a result of this activity, in June 2003, the BLM reduced the bonding requirements for the project to US$406,000.

     In March 2003, on behalf of the Company, SRK Consulting submitted a final plan for permanent closure with the BLM and NDEP. The closure plan was approved by both agencies. As a result of this work, during 2004 the BLM lowered the bonding requirements to $226,205. The Company currently maintains a required performance bond with the Nevada State Office of the BLM in the amount of US$389,360. The Company is working with the BLM and the United States Department of Interior in efforts to further reduce the bond.

Permitting

     In 2002, the Company submitted and was granted a five year renewal of Water Pollution Control Permit (NEV60035) by the NDEP for the Robertson Property. In addition, the Company continues to conduct reclamation and exploration activities under a Plan of Operation (NV067688) approved in 1989 by the BLM.

     During 2000 through 2003, no exploration activity was conducted on the Robertson Property. However, during that period a significant amount of surface reclamation was completed on the property. As a result, new exploration activities in reclaimed areas will require submission and approval of an Amendment to the Plan of Operation. Additionally, theNational Historic Preservation Actrequires that all operators on public lands conduct an archeological survey of the proposed sites of new disturbance. Much of the Robertson Property has been previously cleared under various surveys conducted by Amax. Recent and planned future exploration activities by the Company have moved outside the area covered by previous archeological surveys. It is possible that future exploration will experience delays in receiving approval because additional surveys will be required by state and federal agencies.

     During 2004 through 2006, the Company conducted exploratory drilling under a series of amendments to the Plan of Operation which were approved by the Battle Mountain office of the BLM and NDEP. The 2007 deep drilling was conducted under a Notice of Intent as the proposed drilling activities were outside the area covered by the Plan of Operation. In November 2007, the Company submitted a consolidated Plan of Operations which was approved by the BLM and NDEP in April 2008.

     There are no known environmental or threatened and endangered species issues at the Robertson Property that would provide grounds for denial of approval of an Amended Plan of Operation.

History and Exploration

     The Robertson Property is located in the Tenabo area, a sub-district of the Bullion mining district. Historic lode mining in this district dates from 1905 and placer gold was discovered in many of the dry washes in the Tenabo area in 1916. Between 1937 and 1939, a small dragline dredge and washing plant operated in the district, and a dredge was reported by Humphrey to be operating in lower Mill Gulch in 1945.

     During 1966 through 1970, a number of companies explored the district in search of porphyry copper-style mineralization. In 1968, while drilling a series of shallow rotary holes near the Gold Pan mine, Superior Oil discovered a small, but relatively high-grade zone of gold at shallow depths in what is now known as the Gold Pan zone. However, with additional drilling, Superior Oil quickly lost interest in the district. They were soon followed by a number of mainly Vancouver-based junior mining companies, including Placer Development (1974-75), Teck Corporation (1977), Aaron Mining Ltd. (1975-86), and E & B Exploration Ltd. (1980-81), all of which sporadically explored the Tenabo area with limited success. A summary of the drilling completed by these companies prior to the Company’s involvement (1986) is presented in the table below:

22


Summary of Pre-Coral Drilling Activities at Robertson Property

 Date ofNumber and Type ofDrill 
CompanyActivityHoles DrilledFootage(ft)Target
Superior Oil1968-7092 Conv. Rotaryc. 32,000Gold Pan
Placer Development1973-7423 Conv. Rotaryc. 3,500none
Teck Corporation1977Nonenonenone
Aaron Mining Ltd.19777 Conv. Rotaryc.300Gold Quartz
E & B Exploration Ltd.1980-81148 Rev. Circulation30,807Gold Pan
Totals 27066,607 

     Modern open pit mining and heap leaching began as early as 1974, when Aaron Mining Ltd., referred to as “Aaron”, initiated a pilot leach operation on the Robertson Property. From 1978 through 1980, Aaron expanded its leaching operations and continued exploration and acquiring claims in the district.

     In 1986, the Company acquired Aaron’s interest in the Robertson Property and immediately began a series of major drilling programs beginning in 1986 and continuing until 1989. Mining operations on the Robertson Property commenced in 1988, but were suspended less than one year later. During the operating life of the Robertson Property mine, approximately 350,000 tons of low-grade material was placed on leach pads from which about 6,200 ounces of gold were recovered.

     During 1986 through 1989, the Company completed approximately 380 reverse circulation drill holes and seven diamond drill holes, totaling about 109,377 ft. Much of this drilling was focused in four resources areas including the Gold Pan, Gold Quartz, Gold Quartz extension (also called Gold Quartz West) and the Triplet Gulch areas. The purpose of this drilling was to determine the limits and continuity of mineralization within these zones. Nearly all of the reverse circulation holes were drilled vertically to an average depth of about 300 ft.

     During the later stages of the exploration program, the Company completed two “deep” reverse circulation holes that reached depths of 1,400 ft and 1,810 ft, respectively. In addition to resource definition, the Company also embarked on a program of district-wide exploratory and follow-up drilling of numerous surface anomalies.

     In 1990, the Company and Amax entered into an amended and restated option and earn-in agreement in which Amax could earn a 60% interest in the Robertson Property by producing a bankable feasibility study. From 1990, until Amex withdrew from the venture in 1996, Amax completed an exploration program that included drilling 338 reverse circulation holes and 62 diamond drill holes, totaling over 176,000 ft.

     In 1998, Cortez, entered into an option and earn-in agreement with the Company in which Cortez could earn a 70% interest in the Robertson Property by producing a bankable feasibility study. The focus of Cortez’s exploration was to expand the 39A zone and test a number of outlying targets. During 1999, Cortez completed 46 reverse circulation drill holes and a single flood rotary hole, totaling 57,000 feet. Of the 13 holes directed at expanding the 39A zone, only two holes, 99401 and 99413, encountered significant mineralization. This drilling program did little to expand the resource. Of the remaining holes drilled by Cortez, only two holes (99406 and 99419) encountered significant mineralization. Both holes were designed to offset and/or follow up existing drill intersections and surface gold anomalies.

     After completing this drilling program, Cortez declared its interest in renegotiating the terms of the Option Agreement with the Company. When the Company declined, Cortez subsequently terminated the Option Agreement on December 30, 1999, and did not earn an interest in the Robertson Property.

     During 2004 and 2005, the Company conducted three drilling programs consisting of 32 reverse circulation holes totaling 24,020 ft on the Robertson Property. The focus of this exploration was to expand and further define the 39A Zone, test the “deep” Gold Pan Zone for extensions of the 39A Zone and offset previous ore-grade intersections in the “distal target area”.

23


     The Phase I and Phase II drilling programs in 2006 totaled 35,615 ft of reverse circulation drilling in 46 holes. Depths ranged from 450 ft to 1,500 ft. Due to the relatively flat-lying nature of mineralization at Robertson, all holes were drilled vertically.

     The 2007 deep drilling program on the Robertson Property encountered Carlin-type mineralization, locally with strongly anomalous gold values, in the lower plate of the Robert Mountains thrust fault. The program consisted of two flooded reverse circulation drill holes totaling 6,450 ft.

     In 2008, the Company entered into a contract for 37,600-feet of reverse circulation drilling on the Company’s 100% owned Robertson property at Crescent Valley, Nevada. The agreement, signed with Lang Exploratory Drilling of Salt Lake City, Utah, began in April following permit approval from the BLM.

     In Phase I, the Company drilled 52 reverse circulation holes and Phase II included 11,000 ft of diamond drilling.

     Both Phase I and Phase II were aimed at expanding and upgrading Robertson’s 2.3 million-ounce inferred resource. In February 2008, Beacon Hill reported the Robertson resource, to date situated in a small portion of the property, had increased by more than 110% from the previous calculation. The updated resource was calculated from work completed in 2006 and 2007. With the 2008 drilling, the Company hoped to upgrade a significant portion of the inferred resources into the measured and indicated categories.

     The reverse circulation drilling of Phase I ranged in depth from 500 to 1,200 ft. The work was focused on key, shallow-lying zones locally exposed on surface and also potentially in an open pit mining configuration. Some of the new resources remained open to expansion on strike and at depth.

     The planned 21 diamond drill holes of Phase II ranged from 300 to 1,000 ft in depth. Phase II drilling would:

     1) provide geological data on the controls of mineralization; 
     2) provide geotechnical data for RQD (“Rock Quality Designation”) and specific gravity; 
     3) help confirm grade and continuity; and 
     4) provide material for metallurgical testing.

     The Company continued to reevaluate all past Robertson exploration data and apply some new insights into gold controls in the Cortez Gold Trend, preparing for the 2008 resource expansion drilling.

     To help derive exploration priorities to expand the current resource with the 2008 drilling campaign, a series of in-house, draft open pit shapes had been modeled around the 2008 NI 43-101 compliant inferred resource.

     The inferred resource estimate of 2.3 million ounces of gold grading 0.0250 oz/ton (0.870 g/tonne was announced in February 2008 and a NI 43-101 compliant report is posted on the Company’s website for review athttp://www.coralgold.com/i/pdf/Robertson43-101Final.pdf. The information contained in the Company’s website does not form part of this Annual Report.

     The loosely constrained open pit shapes were calculated at the posted resource cut off grades, for gold prices that range from $600 to $2000 per ounce gold. For simplicity, off site toll milling was considered and loosely estimated Nevada operating costs were used to produce non engineered, simple and idealized open pit shape alternatives. The point of the exercise is not to mimic or consider production alternatives, but provide semi quantitative exploration insight into where added resources might be most effective in any future open pit alternatives.

     In February 2009, the Company completed its reverse circulation drilling program at the Robertson Property in Crescent Valley, Nevada, USA.

24


     The program totaled 22,835 ft of drilling in 33 vertical holes which ranged in depth from 500 to 1200 ft. The holes were located on the Altenburg Hill, South Porphyry, 39A and Distal zones in order to increase the gold resource in these zones. Hole locations can be viewed in maps on the Company’s website atwww.coralgold.com. The information contained in the Company’s website does not form part of this Annual Report.

Geological Setting

     Geologically, the Robertson Property consists of a series of relatively flat-lying, vertically stacked thrust sheets that form part of the Roberts Mountain allochthon, which is composed of siliciclastic rocks of Ordovician through Devonian age. The district is dominated by a very thick sequence of middle to late Devonian Slaven Chert composed mainly of argillite, chert, lesser siltstone and shale, and minor intermediate volcanic rocks. Structurally overlying the Slaven Chert along the north and east sides of the district are a sequence of rusty brown weathering siltstone, sandstone and very minor limestone of the Silurian Elder Sandstone.

     Intruding the thick Paleozoic sequence is an elliptical-shaped, composite granodiorite stock (or lacolith) of Eocene age. The orientation of the principal axis of the stock is approximately east-west. Associated with it are numerous dikes, sills and plugs that vary in composition from diorite, the earliest known intrusion, to rhyolite, the latest. Most of the identified gold resources, including the Porphyry, Gold Pan and 39A zones, lie along or near the northern contact of the composite stock. A series of narrow and laterally continuous (up to 1,600 ft) intrusive “pebble” dikes extend northward from the northern contact of the granodiorite stock. Near contacts with the Tertiary intrusions, many of the sedimentary and volcanic rocks, and early phases of the stock, have undergone significant thermal metamorphism, intense recrystallization, bleaching and pervasive metasomatism. Many of these rocks have been converted to layered sequences of biotite, “quartz” and calc-silicate hornfels, marble, exoskarn and endoskarn.

     Mineralization at the Robertson Property is strongly controlled by a system of low and high-angle faults and related fracture zones. Less commonly, brecciation associated with axial plane shear zones developed in isoclinal folds are also important hosts for mineralization, locally. Although individual structures host ore-grade gold, higher grades commonly occur where one or more structures intersect.

Deposit Types and Mineralization

     The Company has been focusing its exploration activities on four zones localized along the northern contact of the Tenabo stock forming the general east-west trend. These zones are the Porphyry, Gold Pan, Altenburg Hill and 39A zones. The Porphyry, Gold Pan and Altenburg Hill zones occur in highly fractured hornfels and skarn units at the contact of the granodiorite stock, whereas the 39A zone is localized at the intersection of two high-angle faults in retrograde-altered hornfels.

     The following is a summary of the main minerals identified at the Robertson Property:

Native goldNative silverElectrumPyrite
PyrrhotiteMarcasiteArsenopyriteStibnite
ChalcopyriteSphaleriteGalenaBournonite
AcanthiteLoellingiteGersdorffiteTetradymite
PetziteHessiteHedleyiteTellurobismuthite
AltaiteTetrhedriteBorniteChalcocite
CovelliteDigeniteNative copperCuprite
ChysocollaAzuriteGoethiteMagnetite
HematiteIllmeniteScorodite

Mineral Resource Estimates

     In late 2005, an independent third party was contracted by the Company to undertake a Preliminary Assessment of the currently defined mineral resources at the Robertson Property. The results of this study are reported in a NI 43-101 compliant technical report dated April 25, 2006 prepared by R. T. McCusker entitled “Update of the Geological Report on the Robertson Property”.

25


The purpose for this study was to update the 2001 resource estimate, include results from the 2004-2005 drilling programs in the estimate and examine the effect of higher gold price on the economics of the existing resources. The mineral resource estimates of the Porphyry and combined 39A/Gold Pan Zones were conducted by an independent third party and a qualified person pursuant to NI 43-101. The Altenburg Hill and distal Target inferred mineral resources were estimated by R. T. McCusker, a qualified person pursuant to NI 43-101. A summary of the mineral resources estimated to be present on the Robertson Property are presented in the following table:

 Measured mineral resourcesIndicated mineral resourcesTotal measured and indicatedInferred mineral resources
 ShortGoldContainedShortGoldContainedShortGoldContainedShortGold 
 tonsGradeozstonsGradeozstonsGradeozsTonsGradeContained
Zone(000s)(oz/ton)(000s)(000s)(oz/ton)(000s)(000s)(oz/ton)(000s)(000s)(oz/ton)ozs (000s)
Porphyry(1)10,6000.0202122,1000.0183712,7000.020249   
39A/Gold Pan(2)   10,2000.04445010,2000.0444504,9000.039192
Altenburg Hill(1)         3,5000.01863
Distal Target(3)         1,0080.178179
Total10,6000.02021212,3000.04048722,9000.0316999,4080.046434

(1)

Estimates calculated using a 0.010 oz Au/t cutoff grade.

(2)

Estimates calculated using a 0.015 oz Au/t cutoff grade.

(3)

Estimates calculated using a 0.05 oz Au/t cutoff grade.

     It should be noted that the resource classifications applied by an independent third party and R. T. McCusker conform to the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum definitions for measured, indicated and inferred mineral resources, respectively, pursuant to usage under NI 43-101. Further, it should also be noted that mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

     In 2007, Beacon Hill was commissioned by the Company to update the resource estimate on the Robertson Property. The purpose of the study was to incorporate additional drilling completed in 2006 in an updated resource estimate and to establish a program for continued development and provide a basis for a subsequent Technical Report. The final NI 43-101 compliantMineral Resource Estimate for the Robertson Property, Lander County, Nevadareport was received by the Company in February 2008. The new estimate, based on a gold price of US$600 per ounce, raised the Robertson Property inferred resource to over 2.3 million ounces of gold—an increase of 110% over the previous NI 43-101 estimate from April 2006. A portion of the oxide resources are locally exposed at the surface and are potentially in an open pit mining configuration. Some of the new resources remain open to expansion on strike and at depth.

     The zones included in the Beacon Hill estimate are located within the Robertson’s Core claims only. The Company’s other claim blocks, including Norma Sass, Lander Ranch, Ruf, Blue Nugget and the Excluded claims (joint ventured with Cortez Gold Mines), were not part of the estimate.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources

This section uses the terms “measured resources” and “indicated resources.” The Company advises United States investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.

This section uses the term “inferred resources”. We advise United States investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. “Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.United States investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred resource exists, or is economically or legally minable.

26


Robertson Inferred Resources 2008 (by Beacon Hill)

ZoneTonsOz/tAuOunces
Distal10,335,0410.0335346,224
39A25,010,2470.0287717,794
South Zone5,904,7130.0269158,837
Outside2,187,5000.020845,500
Gold Pan Oxide7,049,1810.0262184,689
Altenburg Hill Oxide4,558,4020.020894,815
Porphyry Oxide19,121,9270.0213 407,297
Gold Pan Sulphide12,053,2790.0208250,708
Altenburg Hill Sulphide584,0160.017610,279
Porphyry Sulphide4,480,5330.022399,916
TOTAL91,284,8400.02532,309,506
  • Gold ounces were calculated on the basis of US$600/oz Au and 70% Au recovery.
  • The 0.015 ozAu/ton cut-off grade, utilized to report the resource, was derived from a mining cost of US$1.02/ton, process cost of US$5.00/ton and waste cost of US$1.14/ton.

     The mineral resources in the table above were estimated using the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves.

     This resource is compliant with NI 43-101.

Data Used for Estimate

     A total of 1,204 drill holes were supplied for the Robertson Property in Lander County, Nevada which are the combined drill holes for the Gold Pan, 39A, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill and Lower Triplet Gulch zones in addition to areas that have drilling but lie outside the main areas of interest. The drill holes within the database included collars, downhole surveys, assays, and lithology.

     Solids models of the main ore zones within the Robertson Deposit were created that encompass the Gold Pan, 39A, Porphyry, Altenburg Hill, Distal and Triplet Gulch deposit areas. The ore zones to be included within the solids model and then to be used for constraining the interpolation procedure are split into an Oxide Zone and a Sulphide Zone where sufficient data existed to do so which included the Gold Pan, 39A, Porphyry and Altenburg Hill areas. Due to its depth, the Distal zone is considered to be sulphide material.

     Approximately 200 historic core samples were analyzed for dry bulk density using the volume displacement method. Densities for both ore and waste are primarily related to lithology, argillization, calc-silicate content and sulfide content. The average density for country rock was determined to be 12.2 cu ft/ton and 15.5 cu ft/ton for alluvium (2 determinations). These are historic determinations, which appear to be located for the most part, within the Porphyry Zone however, the exact locations are not known. The relative scarcity of specific gravity data is the primary reason for the resources being categorized as inferred and it is recommended that a comprehensive program to determine localized specific gravity be undertaken for future studies.

Estimate Method

     The estimation plan includes the following items:

  • Storage of the mineralized zone code and percentage of mineralization.
  • Application of density based on limited SG measurements.
  • Estimation of the grades for Au using ordinary kriging.

27


  • Ellipsoid orientation was orthogonal and ranges were set to 300 feet in the northing and easting whilst 200 feet in elevation.

     The estimation strategy employed a minimum of four composites and a maximum of 15 with a maximum of two from any one drillhole.

     Also, an octant search was used as it aids in declustering the estimate. This means that it helps to avoid over-influence of individual drill holes or sectors being overly informed, avoiding the use of samples that clustered together and thereby redundant. The maximum number of composites allowed in any one octant was two.

Conclusions

     It can be concluded that the Robertson Property is one of merit and is worthy of additional development work to enhance the resource base and increase the level of confidence in the resource. It is also concluded that a Preliminary Assessment be completed to ascertain the potential viability of the mineralized zones contained within the Property.

Proposed Exploration

     The Company believes that there is a potential for discovery of additional mineral resources on the Robertson Property. The Company plans to continue to explore the Robertson Property or seek third party partners for further exploration.

(ii) Carve-Out Claims, Nevada, U.S.A.

     Under the terms of an Exploration and Mining Venture Agreement dated July 11, 1997, Barrick, formerly Placer, holds an undivided 61% interest and the Company has a 39% interest carried to production in the Carve-Out Claims.

     Beginning in 1997 and continuing through 1998, Cortez conducted a series of exploratory drilling programs on the Carve-Out Claims with limited success. In 2002, the Company conducted a drilling program on the Carve-Out Claims with follow-up drilling in the immediate vicinity of existing drill holes with mixed results. To date, no significant mineral resources have been discovered on the Carve-Out Claims. However, the wide-space deep drilling has established the presence of scattered significant gold values, anomalous levels of Carlin-type trace elements, key structural components and the occurrence of a preferred host strata.

     The Company plans to rely on Cortez to further explore the property for mineral resources.

     There is no underground or surface plant or equipment located on the Carve-Out Claims, nor any known body of commercial ore.

     No further work on the Carve-Out Claims is proposed at this time.

(iii) Norma Sass and Ruf Claims, Nevada, U.S.A

The Company currently owns a 66.6% interest in the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims, which originally were a part of the Carve-Out Claims, after an option agreement with Levon was amended on October 3, 2002 transferring to Levon a 33.3% interest in the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims.  Levon is a British Columbia company also engaged in the exploration of precious minerals and has fourthree directors in common to the Company.


In January 2005, wethe Company announced the formation of an exploration agreement with Agnico-Eagle.  The agreement covers our the Norma Sass, Blue Nugget and Lander Ranch claims. The Norma Sass agreement also includes our partnership with Levon.  Under the agreement, Agnico-Eagle can earn a 51% interest in the Norma Sass, Blue Nugget and Lander Ranch claims by completing at least 45,000 ftfeet of exploration drilling and paying certain advance royalties. At its option, Agnico-Eagle may acquire the claim leases from the underlying owners for its benefit and Agnico-Eagle shall be deemed to have earned an additional 24% interest.interest at which time Agnico-Eagle will then have the option of acquiring the remaining 25% interest by producing a positive feasibility study and making a positive production decision.

28



At the fifth anniversary and every year thereafter until production occurs, the advance royalty payment will be US$150,000 per annum.  All advance royalty payments will be credited towards Agnico-Eagle’s payment of a royalty of 2.5% net smelter returns from production to the Company and Levon.  Agnico-Eagle has reserved the right to purchase 1% of this net smelter returns royalty (to reduce the royalty to the Company and Levon to 1.5%) for a cash payment of US$1.0 million.  The Company and Levon have agreed to share in any benefits from the agreement with Agnico-Eagle in proportion to their current respective interests in the Norma Sass Property.


In February 2007, Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. notified the Company that it would not be continuing its option on Company’s Norma Sass, Lander Ranch and Blue Nugget properties because of other corporate priorities.  The Company was pleased with the work done by Agnico-Eagle.  They successfully showed depths to the lower plate sequence across the Norma Sass ground and extended the area of gold mineralization at Lander Ranch.  The Company is reviewing results of Agnico-Eagle’s exploration programs in order to plan further work.


In September 2008, the Company entered into an exploration, development and mine operating agreement with Barrick Gold Exploration Inc. (“Barrick”), wherein Barrick is granted the option to acquire up to a 75% interest in the Company’s and Levon interests in the Norma Sass Property, Nevada, consisting of 36 unpatented mining claims.


Barrick may earn a 60% interest by incurring total exploration expenditures of at least US $3US$3 million in annual installments by December 31, 2014.  Barrick may earn an additional 10% (for an aggregate interest of 70%) by incurring an additional US $1.5US$1.5 million by December 31, 2015.  Barrick may earn an additional 5% (for an aggregate interest of 75%) by carrying the Company and Levon through to commercial production.


Alternatively, at the time of earning either its 60% or 70% interest, Barrick may be given the option to buy-out the Company’s and Levon’s joint interest by paying US $6US$6 million and granting them a 2% net smelter returns royalty.


In May 2009, Barrick announced that plans are underway to do target delineation work in the second quarter followed by deep drilling in the third quarter on the Norma Sass property, Cortez Gold Trend, Nevada.  Norma Sass is a 36-claim property immediately west of the Pipeline Mine open pit.  Norma Sass was optioned to Barrick as mentioned in the above paragraph.


The proximity of the Norma Sass claims to Pipeline offers the deep discovery potential Barrick is pursuing.  They have completely remapped and reinterpreted the Pipeline open pit geology since their acquisition of Placer Dome, and have a new stratigraphic model for the host rocks and structural setting of the gold deposit.
29


In October 2009, Barrick commenced drilling hole NS 09-01 targeting the lower plate carbonate sequence. This hole was drilled at 70 degree dip on a northwesterly azimuth across a SW-NE striking fault which trends into Barrick’s Gold Acres pit one mile to the northeast and is thought to be related to mineralization at Gold Acres. The hole was started using a reverse circulation drill which encountered recovery problems at a depth of 1,680 feet and was replaced by a core drill which completed the hole to a final depth of 2,586 feet. The lower plate and Wenban Limestone were intersected starting at a depth of 1,330 feet and Roberts Mountain Formation was encountered from 1,830 feet to the bottom of the hole. These formations are the major host rocks for the gold deposits at the Pipeline, Gold Acres and Cortez Hills mines.

In November 2009, Coral’s technical team visited with Barrick Cortez Gold Mines in Crescent Valley, Nevada.  The group examined the chips and core from hole NS 09-01 at Coral’s Norma Sass property.  The Company is waiting on further information from Barrick.

There is no underground or surface plant or equipment located on the Norma Sass and Ruf Claims, nor any known body of commercial ore.


(iv)    June Claims


The Company announced the completion of a mineral lease with option to purchase agreement to explore, develop, and exploit six lode mining claims located in Lander County, State of Nevada (the “June Claims”). The June Claims are adjacent to the Company’s View Claims in the northwest section of its Robertson Property.  The agreement is for an initial term of 4four years in consideration of the payment of an annual rent of US$25,000, renewable in successive four year terms, provided that the rent will increase by US$5,000 every four years.  The property is subject to a royalty charge of 3% of net smelter returns (“NSR”), subject to the Company’s exclusive right to purchase the NSR for US$1,000,000 per percentage point upon notice to the Lessors.  The Company also has the exclusivee xclusive right to purchase the property, subject to the NSR, for US $1,000,000US$1,000,000 upon notice to the Lessors.  No further work on the June Claims is proposed at this time.


(v)     JDN Claims, Nevada, U.S.A. (formerly known as the JD Mining Claim)


On December 16, 1986, the Company acquired six mining claims on 550 acres of land near Crescent Valley (Lander County), Nevada for US$10,000.  The Company located an additional 28 unpatented lode mining claims covering some 30 acres in May 1996 and acquired a 100% interest by staking the “JDN Claims”.  The JDN Claims are located approximately three miles north of the Robertson Mining Claims.

29


In 1987, geological mapping was conducted.  In fiscal year 1994, the Company optioned a 50% interest in the JDN claims to Mill Bay Ventures Inc., formerly First International Metals Corp., referred to as “Mill Bay”, a company with two directors in common to the Company, for $10,000 and an initial installment of 50,000 common shares of Mill Bay.  On February 5, 1997, Mill BayBa y exercised the option by issuing to the Company an additional 50,000 common shares and completion of specified exploration work.


Access to the JDN Claims from Elko, Nevada, a regional mining supply center, is via Highways 80 and 306, a distance of approximately 102 kilometers to the community of Crescent Valley and then an additional 18 kilometers on a gravel access road from the community of Crescent Valley.  A four-wheel drive vehicle is usually necessary to access all roads on the property.  As of fiscal year 2001, the Company has written down the JDN Claims to a nominal value.  There is no underground or surface plant or equipment located on the JDN Claims, nor any known body of commercial ore.


(vi)    C-EagleEagle Claims, Nevada, U.S.A.

     In 1987, the Company acquired a 100% interest in the C-Eagle Claims.


The C-EagleEagle Claims consist of 1545 lode mineral claims, and are located at Corral Canyon, in Lander County, Nevada, approximately 16 kilometers north-northwest of Placer’s Cortez gold mine and comprises a total of approximately 646 acres.  The C-EagleEagle Claims are approximately three miles west of Crescent Valley, Nevada, and approximately 18 miles southeast of Battle Mountain, Nevada.  Access to the C-EagleEagle Claims from Elko, Nevada, a regional mining supply center, is via Highways 80 and 306, a distance of approximately 90 kilometers and then an additional 13 kilometers on a gravel access road from the community of Crescent Valley.  A four-wheel drive vehicle is usually necessary to access all roads on the property.

30


The C-EagleEagle Claims are subject to a 3% net smelter royalty to Geomex 8, which royalty shall cease at such time as the sum of US$1,250,000 has been paid to Geomex 8.


In fiscal year 1994, the Company optioned a 50% interest in these claims to Levon for $10,000 and 100,000$100,000 Levon common shares.  During 1996, Levon exercised its option and holds a 50% interest in the C-EagleEagle Claims with the Company.  During fiscal year 2000, no substantial work at the C-Eagle Claims was conducted and as of fiscal year 2001, theThe Company has written down the C-EagleEagle Claims to a nominal value.  There is no underground or surface plant or equipment on the C-EagleEagle Claims, or any known body of commercial ore.


(vii)    Ludlow Property, California, U.S.A.


The Company owns certain mining property consisting of approximately 128 acres in San Bernardino County, California, referred to as the “Ludlow Property”.  The purchase price for the Ludlow Property was $28,187, and as of January 31, 2000, the Company expended $36,885 on exploration costs.  The property is located approximately six miles south of Ludlow, California, and is readily accessible by dirt road from Ludlow.  Ludlow lies at the western junction of U.S. Highway 40 and Route 66.  Old wagon roads allow any part of the property to be reached by an easy walk.  The Ludlow property has previously been explored as evidenced by trenches, pits and shallow shafts and adits.  The only recorded data relating to previous exploration applies to the Baghdad-Chase Mine whichwh ich lies approximately two kilometers to the south of the Ludlow Property.


There has been no underground exploration or development work done on the claims by the Company other than geochemical soil sampling and, to the Company’s knowledge, there is no record of the previous work carried out on the claims as indicated by the evidence of trenches, pits and shallow shafts and adits that are located thereon. No exploration work has been performed on the property for the past five fiscal years.  In order to keep the mining title to the Ludlow Property in good standing, the Company is required to pay property taxes.  As of fiscal year 2001, theThe Company wrotehas written down the Ludlow Property to a nominal value.  There is no surface or underground plant or equipment on the Ludlow Property, nor any known body of commercial ore.


Item 4A.   Unresolved Staff Comments

Not Applicable.
Item 5.    Operating and Financial Review and Prospects


The following discussion and analysis of the operations, results and financial position of the Company for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 should be read in conjunction with the January 31, 20092010 Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.

30



The financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP which has several notable differences from US GAAP. Canadian GAAP permits the deferral of acquisition and exploration costs, subject to periodic adjustments for impairment, whereas US GAAP requires that such costs be expensed in the period incurred. In addition, US GAAP requires investments available for sale to be recorded at fair market value with unrealized gains or losses recognized as part of comprehensive income (loss) unless a decline in value is considered to be other than temporary. Effective for fiscal January 31, 2008 the Canadian GAAP treatment is the same, however in fiscal January 31, 2007 such investments were recorded in accordance with Canadian GAAP at the lower of cost and market; long-term investments in marketable securities are written down to market when impairment is considered other than temporary, in which case the written-down value becomes the new cost base, and the impairment is charged to operations. See Note 1816 to the financial statements which sets out a reconciliation between Canadian and US GAAP.

Overall Performance

     The following is a summary

31


A.   Results of significant eventsOperations

Twelve months ended January 31, 2010 compared with the twelve months ended January 31, 2009

General and transactions duringAdministrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses totaled $1,613,713 for the year ended January 31, 2009:

Robertson Property, Nevada

Core Area

  • 2010 compared with $2,516,862 for the year ended January 31, 2009, a decrease of $903,149. This decrease is mainly driven by a significant decrease of $730,974 in stock-based compensation.  The Company doubledlarge cost in stock based compensation in the inferred gold resourcecomparative period is due to over 2.3 million ouncesan expense of $1,513,500 related to the extension of the expiry date of warrants. Refer to Note 8(c) of the Consolidated Financial Statements.


An overall reduction in late 2007. This new calculation was based on 91,284,800 tons grading 0.025 oz Au/ton usingspending has resulted in decreases of $47,923 in legal and accounting, $43,201 in investor relations and shareholder information, $35,936 in travel, $24,560 in salaries and benefits, $9,750 in management fees, and $7,347 in office and miscellaneous. The decrease in investor relations expenses is due to the cancellation of an investor relations consulting contract along with a gold pricereduction in research reports and publications. The decline in travel expenses resulted from less promotional activities in the current year. The lower fees in legal and accounting is resulting from the reduction of US$600/oz and a cutoff grade of 0.015 oz Au/ton. (Details are availablelegal services in our February 11, 2008 news release). Later in 2008,the current period. During the year, the Company also completed 22,385 feetreduced the management and consulting fees paid for two contracts and higher directors’ fees were a result of reverse circulation drillingfees paid to a Director for his service on t he board and various committees.

Income / Loss for the Period

Income for the year ended January 31, 2010 was $1,711,611 compared with a loss of $3,746,165 for prior year, an increase of $5,457,776. In addition to the decrease of $903,149 in 33 vertical holes, partially extending the areasgeneral and administrative expenses, this difference resulted from significant increases of mineralization$1,230,621 in several zones. Highlightsforeign exchange gain along with $3,374,152 in future income tax recovery. Slightly offsetting these differences was a reduction of the drill program included Hole #CR08-13,$67,146 in interest income, which intersected 100 feet grading 0.075 oz Au/ton and included 25 feet grading 0.17 oz Au/ton. Complete drill results and program details are availabledeclined from $69,764 in fiscal 2009 to $2,618 in current year. The write-off of $17,000 in directors’ fees in the Company’s news release issued February 4, 2009. The 2008 drilling program has not as yet been incorporated in the Company’s current resource figures.

  • Deep drilling in 2007 encountered Carlin-type geochemistry including gold in the important lower plate host rocks for Carlin-type structure beneath the Roberts Mountains thrust fault. The gold intercepts indicate a Carlin type system in Lower Plate rocks on a western part of the property. Follow up mapping, rock sampling and infill gravity surveys in 2008 leadperiod also contributed to the Company’s identification of a new lower plate target zone that extends from the coral deep hole, 2 km to the south. The West Deep Carlin-type target adds significant discovery potential to the Robertson Property for a world-class gold deposit. The target zone lies north of the Pipeline Mine open pit along a projected mineralized fault and fracture system that controls gold within that deposit. Considerably more drilling on the Robertson West Deep target is warranted. While the Company would prefer to continue drilling and expanding these targets in 2009, the Company must wait and see what unfolds in the equity markets and regarding its ability to raise additional exploration capital.

  • A. Results of Operations

    variance.


    Twelve months ended January 31, 2009 compared with the twelve months ended January 31, 2008


    General and administrative expenses


    General and administrative expenses totaled $2,516,862 for the year ended January 31, 2009 compared with $1,359,172 for the year ended January 31, 2008, an increase of $1,157,690. The current2009 fiscal year had decreases of $324,141 in legal and accounting fees, $51,076 in listing and filing fees, and $29,490 in management fees. Cost items that increased were $1,459,017 in stock based compensation, $26,320 in consulting fees, $26,233 in travel, $24,690 in salaries and benefits, $13,917 in office and miscellaneous, and $11,098 in investor relations and shareholder information.

    31



    The increase in consulting fees during fiscal 2009 was attributable to the addition of a consultant.  The increased expense in investor relations and travel come from a contract with an investor relation firm engaged earlier in the fiscal year.  The significant higher legal and accounting fees in the prior2008 fiscal year were resulting from the title search of the Robertson Property during the year. As discussed above, the2008.  The increase in stock-based compensation was due the extension of expiry dates of warrants.  Listing and filing fees decreased during the year ended January 31, 2009 with less activity in this area while there were private placement and a share split in the prior2008 fiscal year.  The management fees declined during the year2009 because of the elimination of payment to a former executive officer.

    32


    Loss for the year


    The loss for the year ended January 31, 2009 was $3,746,165 compared with a loss of $1,319,185 for the year ended January 31, 2008, an increase of $2,426,980.  In addition to the increase in general and administrative expenses, there was a future income tax expense of $533,297 and a foreign exchange loss of $765,770, which primarily related to the future income tax calculation. Interest income also decreased by $95,240 due to a lower cash balance.  During the year ended January 31, 2008, there was also a write-down of $24,029 in advances receivable whereas this did not occur in the year ended January 31, 2009.

    Twelve months ended January 31, 2008 compared with


    Currency Fluctuations

    The Company’s currency fluctuation exposure is primarily to the twelve months ended January 31, 2007.

    GeneralU.S. Dollar and administrative expenses

         Generalthe Canadian Dollar. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes, nor does the Company hedge its foreign currency exposure to manage the Company’s foreign currency fluctuation risk.  Fluctuations in and administrative expenses totaled $1,359,172 foramong the year ended January 31, 2008 compared with $1,983,965 forcurrencies in which the year ended January 31, 2007,Company operates could have a decrease of $624,793. The year ended January 31, 2008 had decreases of $98,995 in consulting fees, $50,000 in directors fees, $43,640 in legalmaterial effect on the Company’s operations and accounting, $38,368 in officeits financial results.


    B. Liquidity and miscellaneous, $438,163 in stock-based compensation and $14,378 in travel. Cost items that increased were investor relations and shareholder information by $8,988, listing and filing fees by $30,346, management fees by $2,275 and salaries and benefits by $17,287.

         Legal and accounting fees, consulting fees, office and miscellaneous and directors fees were all higher in the year ended January 31, 2007as a result of the due diligence in connection with a buyout offer and a mineral property review and title search of the Robertson Property. In addition to requiring U.S. based legal services for these activities, there were such items as special committee fees for the directors, liability insurance and financial advisory services whereas these costs were much less or were not incurred in the year ended January 31, 2008.

         Listing and filing fees were higher in the year ended January 31, 2008 because of the fee associated with performing the 3-for-1 common share split. Salaries and benefits were higher due to an increase in personnel to handle marketing, accounting, and administrative demands.

    Loss for the year

         Loss for the year ended January 31, 2008 was $1,319,185 compared with a loss of $2,528,614 for the year ended January 31, 2007, a decrease of $1,209,429. The primary reasons for the decrease in the loss for the year ended January 31, 2008 were the decreased administrative expenses of approximately $624,793 and a foreign exchange gain of $519,722. Interest revenue also increased from $144,422 in the year ended January 31, 2007 to $165,004 for the year ended January 31, 2008, a difference of $20,582. In addition, write-down of advances receivable decreased by $42,091 for the year ended January 31, 2008 compared with the year ended January 31, 2007. Capital Resources


    During the year ended January 31, 2007, there was a write down of investments of $28,657 whereas this did not occur in the year ended January 31, 2008.

    B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

         During year ended January 31, 2009,2010 the Company incurred expenditures that increased theits mineral property carrying value on the Robertson Propertyin Nevada by $1,683,612.$324,301. At this time the Company has no operating income but is earning interest income on its entire cash holdings.

    32



    At January 31, 2009,2010, the Company had working capital of $959,419$648,921 and cash and cash equivalents of $1,332,316.$700,772. During the current year, ended January 31, 2009, the Company had cash proceeds of $59,920$293,160 from the exercise of 107,000523,500 stock options.


    The Company has sufficient cash on hand at this time to finance limited exploration work on its mineral properties and maintain administrative operations. The Company is in the exploration stage. The investmentsinvestment in and expenditures on the mineral propertiesproperty comprise substantially all of the Company’s assets. The recoverability of amounts shown for its mineral property interestsinterest and related deferred costs are dependent upon the continued support of its directors, the discovery of economically recoverable reserves and the ability of the Company to obtain the financing necessary to complete development and achieve profitable operations in the future. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time and the Company may never achieve profitable operations.

    time.


    Mineral exploration and development is capital intensive, and in order to maintain its interests,interest the Company will be required to raise new equity capital in the future. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising additional new equity capital.


    C.  Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

         As the


    The Company is a mineral exploration company with no research and development the information required by this section is not applicable.

    policies.


    D.  Trend Information


    As at the time of filing this Annual Report and as otherwise disclosed in this Annual Report, the Company is not aware of any specific trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a mineralmaterial effect on the Company’s net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause reported financial information not necessarily to be indicative of future operating results or financial condition. Many factors that are beyond the control of the Company can affect the Company’s operations, including, but not limited to, the price of minerals, the economy on a global scale, land and exploration company with no currently producing properties,permitting, and the information required by this section is not applicable.

    appeal of investments in exploration companies. The appeal of exploration companies as investment alternatives coul d effect the liquidity of the Company and thus future exploration, development and financial conditions of the Company. Other factors such as retaining qualified mining personnel and contractor availability and costs could also impact the Company’s operations.

    33

    E.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


    The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

    F.  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

         The

    As of January 31, 2010, the Company has nohad the following contractual obligations.

    obligations:

      Payment due by period 
      Total  <1 year  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  More than 5 years 
    Future Income Tax Liabilities $1,687,363   -   -   -  $1,687,363 
    Total $1,687,363  $-  $-  $-  $1,687,363 
    G.  Safe Harbor


    Certain statements in this Annual Report, including those appearing under this Item 5, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Additionally, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on our website or otherwise, in the future, by us or on our behalf.  Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as “plans”, “expects”, “estimates”, “budgets”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “projects”, “indicates”“ indicates”, “targets”, “objective”, “could”, “may”, or other similar words.


    The forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements.  Such factors include, among others: market prices for metals; the results of exploration and development drilling and related activities; economic conditions in the countries and provinces in which we carry on business, especially economic slowdown; actions by governmental authorities including increases in taxes, changes in environmental and other regulations, and renegotiations of contracts; political uncertainty, including actions by insurgent groups or other conflict; the negotiation and closing of material contracts; and the other factors discussed in Item 3 Key Information  211; “Risk Factors”, and in other documents that we file with the SEC.  The impact of any one factor on a

    33


    particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are interdependent upon other factors; our course of action would depend upon our assessment of the future considering all information then available.  In that regard, any statements as to future production levels; capital expenditures; the allocation of capital expenditures to exploration and development activities; sources of funding of our capital program; drilling; expenditures and allowances relating to environmental matters; dates by which certain areas will be developed or will come on-stream; expected finding and development costs; future production rates; ultimate recoverability of reserves; dates by which transactions are expected to close; cash flows; uses of cash flows; collectability of receivables; availability of trade credit; expected operating costs; expenditures and allowancesal lowances relating to environmental matters; debt levels; and changes in any of the foregoing are forward-looking statements, and there can be no assurances that the expectations conveyed by such forward-looking statements will, in fact, be realized.

    Although we believe that the expectations conveyed by the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information available to us on the date such forward-looking statements were made, no assurances can be given as to future results, levels of activity, achievements or financial condition.

    34


    Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated.  Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described above, as well as others not now anticipated.  The foregoing statements are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company, including factors that could materially affect its financial results, may emerge from time to time.  The Company does not intend to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

    Item 6.  Directors, Senior Management and Employees


    A.    Directors and Senior Management


    The following is a list of the Company’s directors and officers as of July 31, 2009.2010.  The directors were re-elected by the Company’s shareholders on June 26, 200928, 2010 and are elected for a term of one year which term expires at the election of the directors at the next annual meeting of shareholders.


    Name
    Position Held
    Principal Occupation
    Director/Officer Since
    Louis WolfinChief Executive OfficerMining Executive;July 1990
    and DirectorChairman and Director of
     Mining Executive; Chairman and Director of Bralorne Gold Mines Ltd.,
    Director of Avino Silver &
    Gold Mines Ltd., Chief
    Executive Officer and
    Director of Levon
    Resources Ltd. and Director
    of Cresval Capital Corp. July 1990
        
    LloydRonald AndrewsChairman and Director
    Director of Avino Silver &Berkley Resources Inc. and North Coast Live Insurance Company.   Owner and operator of Andrews Orchards
    September 1997January  2010
      Gold Mines Ltd. and the
    Company.
        
    Chris SampsonVice President Exploration and DirectorDirector and Vice PresidentJanuary 1996
    Exploration and DirectorExploration of the Company;
    Professional Engineer,
    Director of Sego Resources
    Ltd. Ltd.January 1996
        
    David Wolfin(1)
    Director, President &
    Chief Executive Officer
    Director, President and PresidentDirectorCEO of the Company; Director of Bralorne Gold Mines Ltd. and Berkley Resources Inc.; Director, President and CEO of Gray Rock Resources Ltd. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.; and Director of Mill Bay Ventures Inc. and Cresval Capital Corp.; Director and VP Finance of Levon Resources Ltd.September 1997
      and Director of Bralorne

    34



    NamePosition HeldPrincipal OccupationDirector/Officer Since
    Gold Mines Ltd. and
    Berkley Resources Inc.;
    President of Gray Rock
    Resources Ltd.; President
    and Director of Avino Silver
    & Gold Mines Ltd.; and
    Director of Mill Bay
    Ventures Inc. and Cresval
    Capital Corp.; Director and
    VP Finance of Levon
    Resources Ltd.
        
    Gary RobertsonDirectorCertified Financial Planner, Director of the Company and Director of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., Bralorne Gold Mines Ltd., Levon Resources Ltd., Mill Bay Ventures Inc. and Sage Gold Inc.July 2003
      Director of the Company and
    Director of Avino Silver &
    Gold Mines Ltd., Bralorne
    Gold Mines Ltd., Levon
    Resources Ltd., Mill Bay
    Ventures Inc. and Sage Gold
    Inc.
        
    Dorothy ChinCorporate SecretaryCorporate Secretary of the Company and of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd., Bralorne Gold Mines Ltd., Gray Rock Resources Ltd., Levon Resources Ltd. and formerly Corporate Secretary of Mill Bay Ventures Inc. and Dentonia Resources Ltd.September 2008
      Company and of Avino
    Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.,
    Bralorne Gold Mines Ltd., ,
    Gray Rock Resources Ltd.,
    Levon Resources Ltd. and
    Mill Bay Ventures Inc.;
    formerly Corporate Secretary
    of Dentonia Resources Ltd.
        
    Lisa SharpChief Financial OfficerChief Financial Officer ofJune 2008
    the Company and of Bralorne Gold Mines Ltd.,
    Coral Gold Resources Ltd.,
    Gray Rock Resources Ltd.,
    Levon Resources Ltd., Mill
    Bay Ventures Inc. and Sonic
    Venerable Ventures Ltd. Technology Solutions Inc.June 2008


    (1)       Mr. David Wolfin is the son of Mr. Louis Wolfin.

    35


    B.    Compensation

         For purposes of this Item 6(B), “named executive officer” of the Company means an individual who, at any time during the year, was:

    (a)

    the Company’s chief executive officer (“CEO”);

    (b)

    the Company’s chief financial officer (“CFO”);

    (c)

    each of the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers, other than the CEO and CFO, who were serving as executive officers as at the end of the most recently completed financial year and whose total salary and bonus exceeded $150,000; and

    35



    (d)

    any additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under (c) except that the individuals was not serving as an officer of the Company at the end of the most recently completed financial year,

    each a “Named Executive Officer” (“NEO”).

         Based on the foregoing definition, during

    During the last completed fiscal year of the Company, there werethe Company had three (3) Named Executive Officers,executive officers, namely its CEO,Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) , Louis Wolfin, its current CFO, Lisa Sharp,President, David Wolfin and its former CFO, Kevin Bales.

    1) Compensation DiscussionChief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Lisa Sharp. At the Company’s Annual General Meeting on June 28, 2010, Louis Wolfin resigned as CEO and Analysis

    David Wolfin was appointed CEO and President of the Company.


    1)  Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    The Company does not have a compensation program other than paying base salaries, incentive bonuses, and incentive stock options to the NEOs.its executive officers.  The Company recognizes the need to provide a compensation package that will attract and retain qualified and experienced executives, as well as align the compensation level of each executive to that executive’s level of responsibility.  The objectives of base salary are to recognize market pay, and acknowledge the competencies and skills of individuals.  The objectives of incentive bonuses in the form of cash payments are designed to add a variable component of compensation, based on corporate and individual performances for executive officers and employees.  No incentive bonuses were paid to executive officers and employees during the most recently completed fiscal year. The objectives of the stock option are to reward achievement of long-term financial and operating performance and focus on key activities and achievements critical to the ongoing success of the Company.  Implementation of a new incentive stock option plan and amendments to the existing stock option plan are the responsibility of the Company’s Compensation Committee.


    The Company has no other forms of compensation, although payments may be made from time to time to individuals or companies they control for the provision of consulting services.  Such consulting services are paid for by the Company at competitive industry rates for work of a similar nature by reputable arm’s length services providers.


    The process for determining executive compensation relies solely on discussions amongst the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) with the input from and upon the recommendations of the Compensation Committee, without any formal objectives criteria and analysis.


    Actual compensation will vary based on the performance of the executives relative to the achievement of goals and the price of the Company’s securities.


    Compensation ElementDescriptionCompensation Objectives
    Annual Base Salary (all NEOs)Salary is market-competitive, fixed level of compensationRetain qualified leaders, motivate strong business performance.
    Incentive BonusesCash payment to add variable component to compensationBased on corporate and individual performances of key personnel.
    Incentive Stock Option (all NEOs)Equity grants are made in the form of stock options.  The amount of grant will be dependent on individual and corporate performance.Retain qualified leaders, motivate strong business performance.

    2) Summary Compensation Table

    36

    2)  Summary Compensation Table

    The following table sets forth particulars concerning the compensation paid or accrued for services rendered to the Company in all capacities during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 20092010 of the Company to its NEOs:

    36


    executive officers:





    Name
    and
    principal
    position







    Year






    Salary
    ($)




    Share-
    based
    awards
    ($)




    Option-
    based
    awards
    ($)
    Non-equity
    incentive plan
    compensation
    ($)





    Pension
    value
    ($)





    All other
    compensation
    ($)





    Total
    compensation
    ($)
    Annual
    incentive
    plans
    Long-
    term
    incentive
    plans
    Louis Wolfin(1) CEO and Director2008$75,000NILNILNILNILNILNIL$75,000
    Lisa Sharp(2) CFO2008$12,756NILNILNILNILNILNIL$12,756
    Kevin Bales Former CFO2008$5,227NILNILNILNILNILNIL$5,227
    Name and principal position(1)
    Year
    Salary
    ($)
    Share-based awards
    ($)
    *Option-based awards
    ($)
    Non-equity incentive plan compensation
    ($)
    Pension value
    ($)
    All other compensation
    ($)
    Total compensation
    ($)
    Annual incentive plansLong-term incentive plans
    David Wolfin
    Director, President and CEO
    2010$30,000NILNILNILNILNILNIL$30,000
    Louis Wolfin (2)
    Director and Former CEO
    2010$75,000NILNILNILNILNILNIL$75,000
    Lisa Sharp
    CFO
    2010$21,820NILNILNILNILNILNIL$21,820
    CHRIS SAMPSON
    Vice President Exploration
    2010$24,690NILNILNILNILNILNIL$24,690
    *The fair value of stock options granted during the last financial year is based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock
    options granted, and the last closing price of the Company’s shares on the trading date immediately preceding the dates of grant of the stock
    options, as a reasonable estimate of the benefit conferred at the time of the grant.

    (1)

    The Company paid an aggregate of $75,000 to Frobisher Securities Ltd., a private corporation controlled by Mr. Louis Wolfin.

    (2)

    Ms. Lisa SharpOn June 28, 2010, David Wolfin was appointed CFOPresident and CEO. David Wolfin was not an executive officer during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2010.

    (2)  On June 28, 2010, Louis Wolfin resigned as CEO and was appointed Chairman of the Company on June 9, 2008.

    Board.


    37

    Annual Base Salary


    Base Salary for the NEOs areexecutive officers is determined by the Board upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and its recommendations are reached primarily by comparison of the remuneration paid by other reporting issuers with the same size and industry and with publicly available information on remuneration that the Compensation Committee feels is suitable.


    The Annual Base Salary paid to the NEOsexecutive officers shall, for the purpose of establishing appropriate increases, be reviewed annually by the Board upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee thereof as part of the annual review of executive officers.  The decision on whether to grant an increase to the executive’s base salary and the amount of any such increase shall be in the sole discretion of the Board and Compensation Committee thereof.

    Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

    The Company does not have a LTIP, pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation intended to serve as an incentive for performance (whereby performance is measured by reference to financial performance or the price of the Company’s securities), was paid or distributed to the NEOexecutive officers during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2009.

    2010.

    Option Based Award

    An Option Based Award is in the form of a grant of an incentive stock option.option plan.  The objective of the incentive stock option is to reward NEOs’,executive officers, employees’ and directors’ individual performance at the discretion of the Board upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.  The plan currently used by the Company is 20082010 Stock Option Plan.

         In the June 26, 2009 Shareholders’ Meeting, the “disinterested” shareholders approved the implementation ofPlan (the “Plan”).

    The Company currently maintains a newformal stock option plan, under which stock options have been granted and may be granted to supersede and replace the existing 2008 Stock Option Plan. The new stock option plan (the "2009 Stock Option Plan") for insiders, employees and other service providers to the Company, will reserve uppurchase a number equal to 10% of the Company’s issued sharescapital from time to time, as a “rolling stock option plan”. Currently, there are 24,989,771 shares issued, so the 2009 Stock Option Plan will currently permit up to 2,498,977 shares for incentive stock option grants under the plan to qualifying persons, less the currently issued and outstanding stock options. New stock options may be granted under the 2009 Stock Option Plan for up to a maximum of ten (10) years.

    37


         In addition, the 2009 Stock Option Plan will limit the number of stock options, which may be granted to any one individual to not more than 5% of the total issued shares of the Company in any 12 month period, and not more than 10% of the total issued shares to all insiders at any time or granted over any 12 month period (in the absence of disinterested shareholder approval). The number of options granted to any one consultant, or a person employed to provide investor relations activities, in any 12 month period must not exceed 2% of the total issued shares of the Company. Any stock options granted under the 2009 Stock Option Plan will not be subject to any vesting schedule, unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors

    time.  For details of the option plan please refer to “Particulars of Matters to be Act Upon” in the Information Circular filed with the SEC on June 8, 2009.

    1, 2010.

    The 2009 Stock Option Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the 2009 Stock Option Plan.Committee. The process the Company uses to grant option-based awards to executive officers is upon the recommendations of the Compensation Committee to the Board.

    Board of Directors.


    The role of the Compensation Committee is to recommend to the Board the compensation of the Company’s directors and the NEOsexecutive officers which the Committee feels is suitable.


    As of January 31, 2010, stock options to purchase a total of up to 2,522,500 shares have been granted and remain outstanding under the Plan, leaving 28,827 options available for issuance. All previous grants of option-based awards are taken into account when considering new grants.

    3) Incentive Plan Awards

    38


    3)  Incentive Plan Awards

    Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards


    The following table sets forth the options granted to the NEOsexecutive officers to purchase or acquire securities of the Company outstanding at the end of the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2009:

    2010:

     Option-based AwardsShare-based Awards
    Name
    Number of securities underlying unexercised options
    (#)
    Option exercise price
    ($)
    Option expiration date
    Value of unexercised in-the-money options
    ($)(1)
    Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested
    (#)
    Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested
    ($)(1)
    David Wolfin(2)
    President, CEO and Director
    120,000
    60,000
    100,000
    90,000
    $1.17
    $1.29
    $1.00
    $0.76
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
    Sept 26, 2012
    Jan 13, 2015
    NilNilNil
    Louis Wolfin(3)
    Director & Former CEO
    150,000
    225,000
    75,000
    $1.17
    $1.29
    $0.76
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
    Jan 13, 2015
    NilNilNil
    Lisa Sharp
    CFO
    50,000$0.76Jan 13, 2015NilNilNil
    (1)  Option-based AwardsShare-based Awards





    Name
    NumberNo value was attributed to unexercised options that were out of
    securities
    underlying
    unexercised
    options
    (#)


    Option
    exercise
    price
    ($)



    Option
    expiration
    date

    Value of
    unexercised in-
    the-money
    options
    ($)(1)

    Number of
    shares or units
    of shares that
    have not vested
    (#)
    Market or
    payout value of
    share-based
    awards that
    have not vested
    ($)(1)
    Louis Wolfin
    CEO and
    Director
    150,000
    150,000
    225,000
    $0.56
    $1.17
    $1.29
    Dec. 1, 2009
    Dec. 12, 2010
    Sept. 5, 2011
    Nil

    Nil

    Nil

    Lisa Sharp
    CFO

    Nil

    N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    N/A

    N/A
    Kevin Bales,
    Former CFO
    10,000
    30,000
    $0.56
    $1.29
    Dec the money on January 31, 2008
    Dec 31, 2008
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    2010.

    (1) No value was attributed to unexercised options that were out of the money on January 31, 2009.

    (2)  On June 28, 2010, David Wolfin was appointed President and CEO. David Wolfin was not an executive officer during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2010.
    (3)  On June 28, 2010, Louis Wolfin  resigned as CEO and was appointed Chairman of the Board.

    39


    Incentive plan awards – value vested or earned during the year


    The following table sets forth the value vested or earned during the year of option-based awards, share-based awards and non-equity incentive plan compensation paid to NEOsexecutive officers during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2009:

    38


    2010:

    Name


    Option-based awards –
    Value vested during
    the year
    ($)(1)
    Share-based awards –
    Value vested during
    the year
    ($)
    Non-equity incentive plan
    compensation – Value earned
    during the year
    ($)
    Louis
    David Wolfin
    (2)
    President, CEO and Director
    Nil
    Nil
    Nil
    Louis Wolfin(3)
    Director & Former CEO
    NilNilNil
    Lisa Sharp
    CFO

    N/ANil

    N/ANil

    N/ANil

    (1) No value was attributed to unexercised vested options that were out of the money on January 31, 2009.

    4) Pension Plan Benefits

    (1)  No value was attributed to unexercised vested options that were out of the money on January 31, 2010.
    (2)  On June 28, 2010, David Wolfin was appointed President and CEO. David Wolfin was not an executive officer during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2010.
    (3)  On June 28, 2010, Louis Wolfin was appointed Chairman of the Board.

    4)  Pension Plan Benefits

    No pension plan or retirement benefit plans have been instituted by the Company and none are proposed at this time.

    5) Termination and Change of Control Benefits

    40


    5)  Termination and Change of Control Benefits

    The Company does not have any employment contracts with the NEOs,executive officers, and there are no contractual provisions for termination of employment or change in responsibilities.

    6) Director Compensation


    6)  Director Compensation

    The following table sets forth the value of all compensation paid to the directors during the most recently completed financial year ended January 31, 2009:

    2010:



    Name

    Fees
    earned
    ($)
    Share-
    based
    awards
    ($)
    Option-
    based
    awards
    ($)(1)
    Non-equity
    incentive plan
    compensation
    ($)

    Pension
    value
    ($)

    All other
    compensation
    ($)


    Total
    ($)
    Fees earned
    ($)
    Share-based awards
    ($)
    Option-based awards
    ($)(1)
    Non-equity incentive plan compensation
    ($)
    Pension value
    ($)
    All other compensation
    ($)
    Total
    ($)
    Lloyd Andrews$12,000NIL$12,000
    Lloyd Andrews(2) (3)
    $12,000NILNILNILNILNIL$12,000
    Gary Robertson(2)NIL$6,000NILNILNILNILNIL$6,000
    Chris SampsonNILNILNILNILNILNILNILNIL
    David WolfinNILNILNILNILNILNILNILNIL
    Victor Chevillon(2)NIL
    Louis WolfinNILNILNILNILNILNILNIL
    Ronald Andrews(2)
    NILNILNILNILNILNILNIL
    Victor Chevillon(4)
    NILNILNILNILNILNILNIL

    (1)

    The fair value of stock options granted during the last financial year is based on the difference between the exercise price of the stock options granted and the last closing price of the Company’s shares on the trading date immediately preceding the dates of grant of the stock options, as a reasonable estimate of the benefit conferred at the time of the grant.

    (2)

    Mr.Independent and Non-Employee Directors.

    (3)  Lloyd Andrews was not nominated for re-election at the annual general meeting held on June 28, 2010.
    (4)  Victor Chevillon resigned as a director of the Company inon May 7, 2009.


    41

    The Company paidpays its independent directors $750 per quarter and an additional $750 per quarter for being a member of three committees. In addition, Lloyd Andrews an independent director,is also paid an annual payment of $12,000 ($6,000 for fees and $6,000 for office expenses).

    expenses.

    Incentive stock options have been granted to non-employee directors of the Company to purchase an aggregate of 220,200 shares of the Company at a price of $0.56 per share exercisable on or before December 1, 2009, of which 160,200 have been exercised, an aggregate of 225,000195,000 shares of the Company at a price of $1.17 per share exercisable on or before December 12, 2010, none of which have been exercised; an aggregate of 165,000105,000 shares of the Company at a price of $1.29 per share exercisable on or before September 5, 2011, none of which have been exercised; and an aggregate of 125,000100,000 shares of the Company at a price of $1.00 per share exercisable on or before September 26, 2012, none of which have been exercised, and an aggregate of 125,000 shares of the Company at a price of $0.76 per share exercisable on or before January 13, 2015, none of which have been exercised.

    39



    Termination of Employment, Changes in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts


    The Company does not have an employment contract with the NEOs,executive officers, and there are no contractual provisions for termination of employment or change in responsibilities.


    C.    Board Practices


    Currently, the Company has five directors.  The size and experience of the Board is important for providing the Company with effective governance in the mining industry.  The Board’s mandate and responsibilities can be effectively and efficiently administered at its current size.  The chairman of the Board is not a member of management.  The Board has functioned, and is of the view that it can continue to function, independently of management as required.  At the Annual General Meeting, held on June 26, 2009,28, 2010, the shareholders elected LloydRonald Andrews, Gary Robertson, Chris Sampson, David Wolfin, and Louis Wolfin as directors.


    The Board has considered the relationship of each director to the Company and considers two of the five directors to be “independent” (Messrs. Andrews and Robertson) for the purposes of National Instrument 58-101 –

    Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices.


    Two of the directors (Messrs. David Wolfin and Louis Wolfin) who are considered related are related by family.  Chris Sampson is also the Vice-President of Exploration of the Company.

    Company and is not independent.


    The Board has addressed the related directorship issues and intends, given a transitional period, to eventually be comprised of a majority of unrelated directors.  Procedures are in place to allow the Board to function independently.  At the present time, the Board has experienced directors that have made a significant contribution to the Company’s success, and are satisfied that it is not constrained in its access to information, in its deliberations or in its ability to satisfy the mandate established by law to supervise the business and affairs of the Company.  The Company’s chairman and independent directors meet in the absence of managing directors. Committees meet independent of management and other directors.  Committees appoint a chairman from their number who presides over thet he committee meetings.


    Mandate of the Board of Directors, its Committees and Management

    The role of the Board is to oversee the conduct of the Company’s business, including the supervision of management, and determining the Company’s strategy.  Management is responsible for the Company’s day to day operations, including proposing its strategic direction and presenting budgets and business plans to the Board for consideration and approval.  The strategic plan takes into account, among other things, the opportunities and risks of the Company’s business.  Management provides the Board with periodic assessments as to those risks and the implementation of the Company’s systems to manage those risks.  The Board reviews the personnel needs of the Company from time to time, having particular regard to succession issues relating to senior management.   Management;Management is responsible for the training and development of personnel.  The Board assesses how effectively the Company communicates with shareholders, but has not adopted a formal communications policy.  Through the audit committee, and in conjunction with its auditors, the Board assesses the adequacy of the Company’s internal control and management information systems.  The Board looks to management to keep it informed of all significant developments relating to or effecting the Company’s operations.  Major financings, acquisitions, dispositions and investments are subject to Board approval.  A formal mandate for the Board and the Chief Executive Officer has not been considered necessary since the relative allocation of responsibility is well understood by both management and the Board.


    The Board and committee’scommittees may take action at regularly held meetings or at a meeting by conference call or by written consent.

    40

    42


    Committees


    Corporate Governance Committee


    The Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in establishing the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices generally identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board, reviewing the composition and functioning of the Board and its committees and making recommendations to the Board as appropriate.  When considering nominees to the Board the Corporate Governance Committee’s mandate requires that it consider the current composition of the Board and give consideration to candidates having experience in the industry, life experience and background.  The Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for the Company’s corporate governance guidelines.  The Corporate Governance Committee may retain legal or other advisors.


    The Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of three directors (Messrs. LloydRonald Andrews, Gary Robertson and Chris Sampson).  Messrs. Andrews and Robertson are considered independent.



    Audit Committee


    The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial statements and other related public disclosures, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to financial reporting, the external auditors, qualifications and independence and the performance of the internal audit function and the external auditors.  The Audit Committee has direct communications channels with the Company’s auditors. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis of financial and operating results.  The Audit Committee can retain legal, accounting or other advisors.


    The Audit Committee consists of Gary Robertson, LloydRonald Andrews and Chris Sampson, all of whom are financially literate.  Currently, the Audit Committee has at least one member with accounting or related financial management expertise. “Financially literate” means the ability to read and understand a balance sheet, an income statement, and a cash flow statement.  “Accounting or related financial expertise” means the ability to analyze and interpret a full set of financial statements, including the notes attached thereto, in accordance with Canadian GAAP.  Gary Robertson and LloydRonald Andrews are both independent, having no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company which could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a member’s independentindepende nt judgment.


    It is intended that this Audit Committee eventually will be comprised solely of unrelated directors.


    The Board has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee which is reviewed annually and sets out the role and oversight responsibilities of the Audit Committee with respect to:

    • its relationship with and expectation of the external auditors, including the establishment of the independence of the external auditor and the approval of any non-audit mandates of the external auditor;
    • determination of which non-audit services the external auditor is prohibited from providing;
    • the engagement, evaluation, remuneration, and termination of the external auditors;
    • appropriate funding for the payment of the auditor’s compensation and for any advisors retained by the Audit Committee;
    • its relationship with and expectation of the internal auditor;
    • its oversight of internal control;
    • disclosure of financial and related information; and
    • any other matter that the Audit Committee feels is important to its mandate or that which the Board chooses to delegate to it.


        ·  
    its relationship with and expectation of the external auditors, including the establishment of the independence of the external auditor and the approval of any non-audit mandates of the external auditor;
        ·  
    determination of which non-audit services the external auditor is prohibited from providing;
        ·  
    the engagement, evaluation, remuneration, and termination of the external auditors;
        ·  
    appropriate funding for the payment of the auditor’s compensation and for any advisors retained by the Audit Committee;
        ·  
    its relationship with and expectation of the internal auditor;
        ·  
    its oversight of internal control;
        ·  
    disclosure of financial and related information; and
        ·  
    any other matter that the Audit Committee feels is important to its mandate or that which the Board chooses to delegate to it.

    43

    Compensation Committee


    The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board the compensation of the Company’s directors and the Chief Executive Officer which the Compensation Committee feels is suitable.  Its recommendations are reached primarily by comparison of the remuneration paid by the Company with publicly available information on remuneration paid by other reporting issuers that the Compensation Committee feels are similarly placed within the same business of the Company.

    41



    The Compensation Committee consists of two unrelated directors (Messrs. Robertson and Andrews) and one related director (Mr. David Wolfin).  It is intended that the Compensation Committee will eventually be comprised solely of unrelated directors.


    D.     Employees


    As at January 31, 2009,2010, the Company has one full-time employee located in Nevada, United States.

    The Company’s senior management as well as administrative and corporate services are located in Canada; however, these people are not considered employees of the Company in a legal sense. Senior management and administrative staff are contracted by the Company through their companies or through the Company’s cost sharing agreement for overhead and corporate services with Oniva International Services Corp.


    E.      Share Ownership


    The following table sets out the share ownership of the directors and officers of the Companyindividuals referred to in “Compensation” as of July 31, 2009:

    August 3, 2010:
    Name of Beneficial OwnerNumber of SharesPercent
    Louis Wolfin1,476,1015.91%
    Chris Sampson66,300*
    Lloyd AndrewsNil*
    Gary Robertson173,550*
    David Wolfin538,6002.16%
    Dorothy ChinNil*
    Lisa SharpNil*

    * Less than one percent

    Name of Beneficial Owner
     
    Number of Shares
     
    Percent
    Louis Wolfin 2,360,101 7.26%
    Chris Sampson 66,300 *
    Ronald Andrews Nil *
    Gary Robertson 173,550 *
    David Wolfin 781,100 2.40%
    Lloyd Andrews(1)
     Nil N/A
    Victor Chevillon(2)
     Nil N/A
    Lisa Sharp Nil N/A

    *Less than one percent

    (1)  Lloyd Andrews was not nominated for re-election at the Company’s annual general meeting held on June 28, 2010.
    (2)  Victor Chevillon resigned as a director on May 7, 2009.
    44

    Outstanding Options

    The following information, as of July 31, 2009,2010, reflects outstanding options held by the Named Executive Officers:

    individuals referred to in “Compensation”:
       Exercise 
     No. of SharesDate of GrantPriceExpiration Date
    Louis Wolfin150,000December 1, 2004$0.56December 1, 2009
    CEO and Director150,000December 12, 2005$1.17December 12, 2010
     225,000September 5, 2006$1.29September 5, 2011
    Lisa SharpNilN/AN/AN/A
    CFO    
      
    No. of Shares
     
    Date of Grant
     
    Exercise Price
     
    Expiration Date
    David Wolfin
    President, CEO and Director
     
    120,000
    60,000
     
    Dec 12, 2005
    Sept 5, 2006
     
    $1.17
    $1.29
     
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
             
    Louis Wolfin
    Director & Former CEO
     
    150,000
    225,000
    75,000
     
    Dec 12, 2005
    Sept 5, 2006
    Jan 13, 2010
     
    $1.17
    $1.29
    $0.76
     
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
    Jan 13, 2015
             
    Lisa Sharp
    CFO
     50,000 Jan 13, 2010 $0.76 Jan 13, 2015
             
    Chris Sampson
    Director
     
    30,000
    60,000
     
    Dec 12, 2005
    Sept 5, 2006
     
    $1.17
    $1.29
     
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
             
    Ronald Andrews
    Director
     50,000 Jan 13, 2010 $0.76 Jan 13, 2015
             
    Gary Robertson
    Director
     
    75,000
    60,000
     
    Dec 12, 2005
    Sept 5, 2006
     
    $1.17
    $1.29
     
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
             
    Lloyd Andrews
    Former Director
     
    120,000
    45,000
     
    Dec 12, 2005
    Sept 5, 2006
     
    $1.17
    $1.29
     
    Dec 12, 2010
    Sept 5, 2011
             
    Victor Chevillon
    Former Director
     NIL N/A N/A N/A
    45

    Item 7.    Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions


    A.    Major Shareholders


    To the knowledge of the Company, it is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by any other corporation or by the Canadian Government, or any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person(s) severally or jointly.


    As of July 31, 2009,August 3, 2010, to the knowledge of the Company’s directors and senior officers, no person who owned more than five (5%) percent of the outstanding shares of each class of the Company’s voting securities.

    42


    securities other than Louis Wolfin who owned 2,360,101 common shares, about 7.26% of the outstanding common shares.


    B.     Related Party Transactions


    Related party transactions for the year ended January 31, 20092010 are as follows:


    During the year ended January 31, 2009:

    2010:

    (a)  (a)

    $30,000 (2008(2009 - $30,000; 20072008 - $30,000) was paid for consulting fees to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company;


    (b)  
    (b)

    $75,000 (2008(2009 - $75,000; 20072008 - $31,250)$75,000) was paid for management fees to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company;


    (c)  
    (c)

    $30,000 (2008-20,250 (2009 - $30,000; 20072008 - $65,000) was paid for management fees to a private company controlled by aan officer of the Company;


    (d)  
    (d)

    $30,000 (2008- $Nil; 200720,250 (2009 - $Nil)$30,000; 2008 - $nil) was paid for consulting fees to a private company controlled by aan officer of a related Company;


    (e)  
    (e)

    $186,734 (2008147,711 (2009 - $168,983; 2007$186,734; 2008 - $116,135)$168,983) was charged for office occupancy and miscellaneous, costssalaries and salaries,benefits, and administrative services paid on behalf of the Company by Oniva International Services Corp. (“Oniva”), a private company owned by the Company and five other reporting issuers having common directors;


    (f)  
    (f)

    $39,526 (2008- $15,332; 2007nil (2009 - $Nil)$39,526; 2008 - $15,332) was paid for geological consulting services to a private company controlled by a former director of the Company;


    (g)  
    (g)

    $35,888 (2008- $42,661; 200724,690 (2009 - $47,198)$35,888; 2008 - $42,661) was paid for geological consulting services to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company; and


    (h)  
    (h)

    $12,000 (2008-18,000 (2009 - $12,000; 20072008 - $62,000)$12,000) was paidcharged for directors’ fees to the Directors’ of the Company.

    Company; and


    (i)  $17,000 (2009 - $nil; 2008 - $nil) in advances payable to related parties relating to directors’ fees outstanding since 2003 was reversed during the year.

    46

    These charges were measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount agreed upon by the transacting parties.


    The Company entered into a cost-sharing agreement during 2005 to reimburse Oniva International Services Corp. for a variable percentage of its overhead expenses, to reimburse 100% of its out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of the Company, and to pay a percentage fee based on the total overhead and corporate expenses referred to above. The agreement may be terminated with one month’s notice by either party.


    Advances receivable from related party comprises of $52,891 US (2008US$56,277 (2009 - $52,891 US)US$52,891) less an allowance for bad debt of $39,113 US (2008US$39,113 (2009 - $39,113)US$39,113).  The advances receivable from related partiesparty is from a public company related by common directors.  Amounts due are without stated terms of interest or repayment.


    Advances payable to related parties include $12,288 (2008$14,949 (2009 - $16,662) owed$12,288) due to Oniva, $17,000 (2008$6,000 (2009 - $17,000; owed$17,000) due to directors of the Company, $2,073 (2009 - $1,526) due to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company and $40,796 (2008$nil (2009 - $25,967owed$39,270) due to threea private companiescompany controlled by directors and officersa former director of the Company.company. Amounts due are without stated terms of interest or repayment.


    C.      Interests of Experts and Counsel


    Not Applicable.

    43


    Item 8.    Financial Information


    A.     Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information


    The following financial statements of the Company are included under Item 17 to this Annual Report and include the following:

    • Auditor’s Reports;

    ·  Audit Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;
    ·  Consolidated Balance Sheets as at January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009;
    ·  Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008;
    ·  Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008;
    ·  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008; and
    ·  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

    Legal Proceedings

    The Company is not involved in any legal or arbitration proceedings, including those relating to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings and January 31, 2008;
  • Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss forthose involving any third party, which may have, or had in the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007;
  • Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity forrecent past, significant effects on the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007;
  • Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007; and
  • NotesCompany’s financial position or profitability, including governmental proceedings pending or known to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
  • be contemplated.


    Dividend Policy


    The Company has never paid any dividends and does not intend to in the near future.


    B.    Significant Changes


    None.

    47

    Item 9.    The Offering and Listing


    A.     Offer and Listing Details

         As of July 31, 2009, there were 69 holders of record in the United States holding 12.81% of the Company’s outstanding common shares representing approximately 81.17% of the total shareholders. The Company’s common shares are issued in registered form and the percentage of shares reported to be held by record holders in the United States is taken from the records of the Computershare Investor Services Inc. in the City of Vancouver, the registrar and transfer agent for the common shares.


    The following table sets forth the high and low prices expressed in Canadian dollars on the TSX-V for the Company’s common stock and the high and low prices expressed in United States dollars quoted on the OTCBB for the periods indicated.

     TSX-VOTCBB
     (Canadian Dollars)(United States Dollars)
         
    Last Six MonthsHighLowHighLow
    July 20090.640.350.570.31
    June 20090.610.440.590.32
    May 20090.620.450.590.32
    April 20090.660.480.610.35
    March 20090.740.540.620.41
    February 20090.940.320.680.15
         
    2008-2009HighLowHighLow
    Fourth Quarter ended January 31, 20090.400.130.300.07
    Third Quarter ended October 31, 20080.640.110.600.08
    Second Quarter ended July 31, 20081.080.581.050.56
    First Quarter ended April 30, 20081.490.801.490.80

    44



    2007-2008HighLowHighLow
    Fourth Quarter ended January 31, 20080.850.450.850.45
    Third Quarter ended October 31, 2007(2)1.250.661.120.60
    Second Quarter ended July 31, 2007(2)3.252.661.170.77
    First Quarter ended April 30, 2007(2)3.982.701.150.76
    Last Five Fiscal YearsHighLowHighLow
    2009 Annual1.490.111.490.07
    2008 Annual(2)3.980.451.170.45
    2007 Annual6.992.705.952.30
    2006 Annual4.170.993.300.80
    2005 Annual(1)4.301.122.400.90
      
    TSX-V
    (Canadian Dollars)
      
    OTCBB
     (United States Dollars)
     
    Last Six Months
     
    High
      
    Low
      
    High
      
    Low
     
    July 2010  0.49   0.28   0.50   0.26 
    June 2010  0.58   0.44   0.57   0.41 
    May 2010  0.59   0.48   0.59   0.42 
    April 2010  0.59   0.46   0.59   0.46 
    March 2010  0.60   0.49   0.57   0.47 
    February 2010  0.66   0.48   0.65   0.47 
    2009-2010 High  Low  High  Low 
    Fourth Quarter ended January 31, 2010  0.87   0.57   0.88   0.53 
    Third Quarter ended October 31, 2009  1.00   0.38   0.93   0.33 
    Second Quarter ended July 31, 2009  0.64   0.35   0.59   0.31 
    First Quarter ended April 30, 2009  1.00   0.29   0.69   0.15 

    2008-2009 
    High
      
    Low
      
    High
      
    Low
     
    Fourth Quarter ended January 31, 2009  0.40   0.13   0.30   0.07 
    Third Quarter ended October 31, 2008  0.64   0.11   0.60   0.08 
    Second Quarter ended July 31, 2008  1.08   0.58   1.05   0.56 
    First Quarter ended April 30, 2008  1.49   0.80   1.49   0.80 
    Last Five Fiscal Years
     
    High
      
    Low
      
    High
      
    Low
     
    2010 Annual  1.00   0.29   0.93   0.15 
    2009 Annual  1.49   0.11   1.49   0.07 
    2008 Annual(1)
      3.98   0.45   1.17   0.45 
    2007 Annual  6.99   2.70   5.95   2.30 
    2006 Annual  4.17   0.99   3.30   0.80 
    (1)

    On July 30, 2004, the shareholders approved a 10:1 share consolidation. The share consolidation was effective September 14, 2004. These share prices reflect the pre-consolidation shares.

    (2)

    On July 17, 2007 the shareholders approved a subdivision of the Company’s issued share capital by dividing one common share into three common shares. This was accepted for filing by the TSX Venture Exchange on August 19, 2007 and the common shares commenced trading on a sub-divided basis at the opening of August 29, 2007.


    48

    B.    Plan of Distribution


    Not Applicable.


    C.    Markets


    The common stock of the Company is listed on the TSX-V under the symbol “CLH”, in the United States on the OTCBB under the symbol “CLHRF” and on the FSE under the symbol “GV8”.


    D.     Selling Shareholders


    Not applicable.


    E.      Dilution


    Not applicable.


    F.     Expenses of the Issue


    Not applicable.

    Item 10.  Additional Information


    A.     Share Capital


    Not applicable.

    applicable.


    B.     Memorandum and Articles of Association


    Carol Energy Corporation was incorporated on January 22, 1981 under the Company Act of the Province of British Columbia, which changed its name to Coral Energy Corporation on March 3, 1981.  On September 9, 1987, Coral Energy Corporation changed its name to the Coral Gold Corp. On September 13, 2004, the Company changed its name to Coral Gold Resources Ltd. in conjunction with a 10:1 share consolidation.  It is anticipated that this consolidation may help the Company access institutional investors in both the United States and Europe.

    45

    49


    Common Shares


    All issued and outstanding common shares are fully paid and non-assessable.  Each holder of record of common shares is entitled to one vote for each common share so held on all matters requiring a vote of shareholders, including the election of directors.  The holders of common shares will be entitled to dividends on a pro-rata basis, if and when as declared by the board of directors.  There are no preferences, conversion rights, preemptive rights, subscription rights, or restrictions or transfers attached to the common shares.  In the event of liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the holders of common shares are entitled to participate in the assets of the Company available for distribution after satisfaction of the claims of creditors.


    Powers and Duties of Directors


    The directors shall manage or supervise the management of the affairs and business of the Company and shall have authority to exercise all such powers of the Company as are not, by the British ColumbiaBusiness Corporations Actor by the Memorandum or Articles, required to be exercised by the Company in a general meeting.


    Directors will serve as such until the next annual meeting.  In general, a director who is, in any way, directly or indirectly interested in an existing or proposed contract or transaction with the Company whereby a duty or interest might be created to conflict with his duty or interest as a director, that director shall declare the nature and extent of his interest in such contract or transaction or the conflict or potential conflict with his duty and interest as a director.  Such director shall not vote in respect of any such contract or transaction with the Company in which he is interested and if he shall do so, his vote shall not be counted, but he shall be counted in the quorum present at the meeting at which such vote is taken.  However, notwithstanding the foregoing, directors shall have the right to vote on determining the remuneration of the directors.


    The directors may from time to time on behalf of the Company:  (a) borrow money in such manner and amount from such sources and upon such terms and conditions as they think fit; (b) issue bonds, debentures and other debt obligations; and/or (c) mortgage, charge or give other security on the whole or any part of the property and assets of the Company.


    The majority of the directors of the Company must be persons ordinarily resident in Canada and one director of the Company must be ordinarily resident in British Columbia and be of the full age of 18 years. There is no minimum share ownership to be a director.  No person shall be a director of the Company who is not capable of managing their own affairs;affairs, is an undischarged bankrupt;bankrupt, convicted of an offense in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or involved in fraud within the last five years;years, or a person that has had a registration in any capacity under the “British ColumbiaSecurities Act” or the “British ColumbiaMortgage Brokers Act” canceled within the last five years.


    Shareholders


    An annual general meeting shall be held once in every calendar year at such time and place as may be determined by the directors.  A quorum at an annual general meeting and special meeting shall be two shareholders or one or more proxy holder representing two shareholders, or one shareholder and a proxy holder representing another shareholder.  There is no limitation imposed by the laws of Canada or by the charter or other constituent documents of the Company on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote the common shares, other than as provided in theInvestment Canada Act, (the “Investment Act”) discussed below under “Item 10. Additional Information, D. Exchange Controls.”


    In accordance with British Columbia law, directors shall be elected by an “ordinary resolution” which means: (a) a resolution passed by the shareholders of the Company at a general meeting by a simple majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy: or (b) a resolution that has been submitted to the shareholders of the Company who would have been entitled to vote on it in person or by proxy at a general meeting of the Company and that has been consented to in writing by such shareholders of the Company holding shares carrying not less than the requisite majority of the votes entitled to be cast on it.

    46

    50


    Under British Columbia law certain items such as an amendment to the Company’s articles or entering into a merger requires approval by a special resolution which means: (a) a resolution passed by a majority of not less than the requisite majority of the votes cast by the shareholders of the Company who, being entitled to do so, vote in person or by proxy at a general meeting of the company; or (b) a resolution consented to in writing by every shareholder of the Company who would have been entitled to vote in person or by proxy at a general meeting of the Company, and a resolution so consented to is deemed to be a special resolution passed at a general meeting of the Company.


    C.     Material Contracts


    The Company entered into a cost sharing agreement dated October 1, 1997, and amended November 1, 2003 to reimburse Oniva International for a variable percentage of Oniva’s overhead expenses, to reimburse 100% of Oniva’s out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of the company, and to pay to Oniva a percentage fee based on the total overhead and corporate expenses. The agreement may be terminated with one month notice by either party.

    In April 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Boart Longyear Drilling Services (“Boart Longyear”) to perform certain services on its Robertson Property on a per unit basis. The agreement may be terminated by either party with ten days notice without penalty.

    In April 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Major Drilling America, Inc. (“Major Drilling”) to perform certain drilling and other related services on the Robertson Property on a per unit basis.
    D.     Exchange Controls


    Canada has no system of exchange controls.  There are no Canadian restrictions on the repatriation of capital or earnings of a Canadian public company to non-resident investors. There are no laws in Canada or exchange restrictions affecting the remittance of dividends, profits, interest, royalties and other payments to non-resident holders of the Issuer’s securities, except as discussed below under “Item 10. Additional Information, E. Taxation.”


    There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the organizing documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that the Investment Canada Act may require review and approval by the Minister of Industry (Canada) of certain acquisitions of “control” of the Company by a “non-Canadian”. The threshold for acquisitions of control is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company. “Non-Canadian” generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.


    E.     Taxation


    Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences


    The following summarizes the principal Canadian federal income tax consequences applicable to the holding and disposition of common shares in the capital of the Company by a United States resident, and who holds common shares solely as capital property, referred to as a “U.S. Holder”.  This summary is based on the current provisions of theIncome Tax Act(Canada) (the “Tax Act”), the regulations thereunder, all amendments thereto publicly proposed by the government of Canada, the published administrative practices of Revenue Canada, Customs, Excise and Taxation, and on the current provisions of theCanada-United States Income Tax Convention, 1980, as amended, referred to as the “Treaty”“Trea ty”.  Except as otherwise expressly provided, this summary does not take into account any provincial, territorial or foreign (including without limitation, any U.S.) tax law or treaty.  It has been assumed that all currently proposed amendments will be enacted substantially as proposed and that there is no other relevant change in any governing law or practice, although no assurance can be given in these respects.

    51


    Each U.S. Holder is advised to obtain tax and legal advice applicable to such U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances.


    Every U.S. Holder is liable to pay a Canadian withholding tax on every dividend that is or is deemed to be paid or credited to the U.S. Holder on the U.S. Holder’s common shares.  The statutory rate of withholding tax is 25% of the gross amount of the dividend paid.  The Treaty reduces the statutory rate with respect to dividends paid to a U.S. Holder for the purposes of the Treaty.  Where applicable, the general rate of withholding tax under the Treaty is 15% of the gross amount of the dividend, but if the U.S. Holder is a company that owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the Company and beneficially owns the dividend, the rate of withholding tax is 5% for dividends paid or credited after 1996 to such corporate U.S. Holder.  The Company is required to withhold the applicable tax from the dividend payable to the U.S. Holder, and to remit the tax to the Receiver General of Canada for the account of the U.S. Holder.

    47



    Pursuant to the Tax Act, a U.S. Holder will not be subject to Canadian capital gains tax on any capital gain realized on an actual or deemed disposition of a common share, including a deemed disposition on death, provided that the U.S. Holder did not hold the common share as capital property used in carrying on a business in Canada, and that neither the U. S. Holder nor persons with whom the U.S. Holder did not deal at arm’s length (alone or together) owned or had the right or an option to acquire 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of the Company at any time in the five years immediately preceding the disposition.


    United States Federal Income Tax Consequences


    Passive Foreign Investment Company.


    The Company believes that it is a passive foreign investment company referred to as a(a “PFIC”) for United States federal income tax purposes with respect to a United States Investor.  The Company will be a PFIC with respect to a United States Investor if, for any taxable year in which such United States Investor held the Company’s shares, either (i) at least 75 % of the gross income of the Company for the taxable year is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the Company’s assets are attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income.  In each case, the Company must take into account a pro rata share of the income and the assets of any company in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the stock by value (the “look-through” rules).   Passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other than rents and royalties derived from the active conduct of a trade or business and not derived from a related person), annuities, and gains from assets that produce passive income.  As a publicly traded corporation, the Company would apply the 50% asset test based on the value of the Company’s assets.


    Because the Company believes it qualifies as a PFIC, unless a United States Investor who owns shares in the Company (i) elects (a section 1295 election) to have the Company treated as a “qualified electing fund”, referred to as a “QEF” (described below), or (ii) marks the stock to market (described below), the following rules apply:


     1.

    Distributions made by the Company during a taxable year to a United States Investor who owns shares in the Company that are an “excess distribution” (defined generally as the excess of the amount received with respect to the shares in any taxable year over 125% of the average received in the shorter of either the three previous years or such United States Investor’s holding period before the taxable year) must be allocated ratably to each day of such shareholder’s holding period.  The amount allocated to the current taxable year and to years when the corporation was not a PFIC must be included as ordinary income in the shareholder’s gross income for the year of distribution.  The remainder is not included in gross income but the shareholder must pay a deferred tax on that portion.  The deferred tax amount, in general, is the amount of tax that would havehav e been owed if the allocated amount had been included in income in the earlier year, plus interest.  The interest charge is at the rate applicable to deficiencies in income taxes.


     2.

    The entire amount of any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of the shares will be treated as an excess distribution made in the year of sale or other disposition and as a consequence will be treated as ordinary income and, to the extent allocated to years prior to the year of sale or disposition, will be subject to the interest charge described above.


    52

    A shareholder that makes a section 1295 election will be currently taxable on his or her pro rata share of the Company’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain (at ordinary income and capital gains rates, respectively) for each taxable year of the Company, regardless of whether or not distributions were received. The shareholder’s basis in his or her shares will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed income.  Distributions of income that had previously been taxed will result in a corresponding reduction of basis in the shares and will not be taxed again as a distribution to the shareholder.

    48



    A shareholder may make a section 1295 election with respect to a PFIC for any taxable year of the shareholder (a “shareholder’s election year”).  A section 1295 election is effective for the shareholder’s election year and all subsequent taxable years of the shareholder.  Procedures exist for both retroactive elections and filing of protective statements.  Once a section 1295 election is made it remains in effect, although not applicable, during those years that the Company is not a PFIC.  Therefore, if the Company re-qualifies as a PFIC, the section 1295 election previously made is still valid and the shareholder is required to satisfy the requirements of that election.  Once a shareholder makes a section 1295 election, the shareholder may revoke the election onlyo nly with the consent of the Commissioner.


    If the shareholder makes the section 1295 election for the first tax year of the Company as a PFIC that is included in the shareholder’s holding period, the PFIC qualifies as a pedigreed QEF with respect to the shareholder.  If a QEF is an unpedigreed QEF with respect to the shareholder, the shareholder is subject to both the non-QEF and QEF regimes.  Certain elections are available which enable shareholders to convert an unpedigreed QEF into a pedigreed QEF thereby avoiding such dual application.


    A shareholder making the section 1295 election must make the election on or before the due date, as extended, for filing the shareholder’s income tax return for the first taxable year to which the election will apply.  A shareholder must make a section 1295 election by completing Form 8621;8621, attaching said Form to its federal income tax return;return, and reflecting in the Form the information provided in the PFIC Annual Information Statement or if the shareholder calculated the financial information, a statement to that effect.  The PFIC Annual Information Statement must include the shareholder’s pro rata shares of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of the PFIC for the PFIC’s taxable year or information that will enable the shareholder to calculate its pro rata shares.  In addition, the PFIC Annual Information Statement must contain information about distributions to shareholders and a statement that the PFIC will permit the shareholder to inspect and copy its permanent books of account, records, and other documents of the PFIC necessary to determine that the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of the PFIC have been calculated according to federal income tax accounting principles.  A shareholder may also obtain the books, records and other documents of the foreign corporation necessary for the shareholder to determine the correct earnings and profits and net capital gain of the PFIC according to federal income tax principles and calculate the shareholder’s pro rata shares of the PFIC’s ordinary earnings and net capital gain.  In that case, the PFIC must include a statement in its PFIC Annual Information Statement that it has permitted the shareholder to examine the PFIC’s books of account, records, and other documents necessary for the shareholder tot o calculate the amounts of ordinary earnings and net capital gain.  A shareholder that makes a Section 1295 election with respect to a PFIC held directly or indirectly, for each taxable year to which the Section 1295 election applies, must comply with the foregoing submissions.


    Because the Company’s stock is “marketable” under section 1296(e), a U.S. Investor may elect to mark the stock to market each year.  In general, a PFIC shareholder who elects under section 1296 to mark the marketable stock of a PFIC includes in income each year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the PFIC stock as of the close of the taxable year over the shareholder’s adjusted basis in such stock.  A shareholder is also generally allowed a deduction for the excess, if any, of the adjusted basis of the PFIC stock over the fair market value as of the close of the taxable year.  Deductions under this rule, however, are allowable only to the extent of any net mark to market gains with respect to the stock included by the shareholder for prior taxable years.yea rs.  While the interest charge regime under the PFIC rules generally does not apply to distributions from and dispositions of stock of a PFIC where the U.S. Investor has marked to market, coordination rules for limited application will apply in the case of a U.S. Investor that marks to market PFIC stock later than the beginning of the shareholder’s holding period for the PFIC stock.

    53


    Special rules apply with respect to the calculation of the amount of the foreign tax credit with respect to excess distributions by a PFIC or inclusions under a QEF.

    49



    Controlled Foreign Corporations.


    Sections 951 through 964 and Section 1248 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) relate to controlled foreign corporations, referred to as “CFCs”.  A foreign corporation that qualifies as a CFC will not be treated as a PFIC with respect to a shareholder during the portion of the shareholder’s holding period after December 31, 1997, during which the shareholder is a 10% United States shareholder and the corporation is a CFC.  The PFIC provisions continue to apply in the case of PFIC that is also a CFC with respect to shareholders that are less than 10% United States shareholders.


    The 10% United States shareholders of a CFC are subject to current United States tax on their pro rata shares of certain income of the CFC and their pro rata shares of the CFC’s earnings invested in certain United States property.  The effect is that the CFC provisions may impute some portion of such a corporation’s undistributed income to certain shareholders on a current basis and convert into dividend income some portion of gains on dispositions of stock, which would otherwise qualify for capital gains treatment.


    The Company does not believe that it is not and will not be a CFC.  It is possible that the Company could become a CFC in the future.  Even if the Company were classified as a CFC in a future year, however, the CFC rules referred to above would apply only with respect to 10% shareholders.

    Personal Holding Company/Foreign Personal Holding Company/Foreign Investment Company


    A corporation will be classified as a personal holding company or a(a “PHC”,) if at any time during the last half of a tax year (i) five or fewer individuals (without regard to their citizenship or residence) directly or indirectly or by attribution own more than 50% in value of the corporation’s stock and (ii) at least 60% of its ordinary gross income, as specially adjusted, consists of personal holding company income (defined generally to include dividends, interest, royalties, rents and certain other types of passive income).  A PHC is subject to a United States federal income tax of 39.6% on its undistributed personal holding company income (generally limited, in the case of a foreign corporation, to United States source income).


    A corporation will be classified as a foreign personal holding company or an(an “FPHC”,) and not a PHC if at any time during a tax year (i) five or fewer individual United States citizens or residents directly or indirectly or by attribution own more than 50% of the total combined voting power or value of the corporation’s stock and (ii) at least 60% of its gross income consists of foreign personal holding company income (defined generally to include dividends, interest, royalties, rents and certain other types of passive income).  Each United States shareholder in a FPHC is required to include in gross income, as a dividend, an allocable share of the FPHC’s undistributed foreign personal holding company income (generally the taxable income of the FPHC, as specially adjusted).


    A corporation will be classified as a foreign investment company or an(an “FIC”,) if for any taxable year it: (i) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a management company or share investment trust or is engaged primarily in the business of investing or trading in securities or commodities (or any interest therein); and (ii) 50% or more of the value or the total combined voting power of all the corporation’s stock is owned directly or indirectly (including stock owned through the application of attribution rules) by United States persons.  In general, unless an FIC elects to distribute 90% or more of its taxable income (determined under United States tax principles as specially adjusted) to its shareholders, gain on the sale or exchange of FIC stock is treated as ordinary income (rather than capital gain) to the extent of such shareholder’s ratable share of the corporation’s earnings and profits for the period during which such stock was held.

    54


    The Company believes that it is not and will not be a PHC, FPHC or FIC.  However, no assurance can be given as to the Company’s future status.

    50



    U.S. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding.


    Dividends are generally subject to the information reporting requirements of the Code. Dividends may be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 31% unless the holder provides a taxpayer identification number on a properly completed Form W-9 or otherwise establishes an exemption.


    The amount of any backup withholding will not constitute additional tax and will be allowed as a credit against the United States Investor’s federal income tax liability.


    Filing of Information Returns.


    Under a number of circumstances, a United States Investor acquiring shares of the Company may be required to file an information return.  In particular, any United States Investor who becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of 10% or more of the shares of the Company will be required to file such a return.  Other filing requirements may apply and United States Investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning these requirements.


    F.     Dividends and Paying Agents


    Not applicable.


    G.     Statement by Experts


    Not applicable.


    H.     Documents on Display


    The Company is required to file financial statements and other information with the Securities Commission in the Provinces of British Columbia, Ontario and Alberta, electronically through the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) which can be viewed at www.sedar.com.


    The Company files annual reports and furnishes other information with the SEC.  You may read and copy any document that we file at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549 or by accessing the Commission’s website (http://www.sec.gov).


    Copies of the Company’s material contracts are kept in the Company’s administrative headquarters.

    55


    I.      Subsidiary Information


    Not applicable.

    Item 11. Quantitative11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


    Not applicable

    Item 12. Description12.Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities


    Not applicable.

    51


    PART II

    Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies


    None.

    Item 14. Material14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds


    None.

    Item 15T. Controls15T.Controls and Procedures


    56

    Disclosure Controls and Procedures


    As required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.  Based on the evaluation, these officers concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.  These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  The conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective was due to the presence of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as identified below under the heading “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”


    Management anticipates that such disclosure controls and procedures will not be effective until the material weaknesses are remediated.  The Company intends to remediate the material weaknesses as set out below.


    Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within the Company have been detected.


    Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


    The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) for the Company.  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance, not absolute assurance, regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions arear e recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, and that the Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.


    Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

    52



    The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, along with an independent consultant, conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 20092010 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control –Integrated– Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s management concluded the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as at January 31, 200920 10 due to the following material weaknesses: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting, financial reporting and corporate governance; and (iii) insufficient disaster recovery plans.


    The Company has taken steps to enhance and improve the design of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, however these steps were not complete as of January 31, 2009.2010.  During the period covered by this Annual Report,annual report on Form 20-F, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above.  To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to implement the following changes during it’s the Company’s fiscal year ending January 31, 2010:2011: (i) address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting, financial reporting and corporate governance; and (iii) implement a disaster recovery plan.


    The Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

    annual report.

    57


    Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.


    Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


    There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting in the year ended January 31, 2009. However,2010; however, as a result of the evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009,2010, conducted by the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and an independent consultant, we expect to make such changes during the year ending January 31, 2010.

    2011.
    Item 16.  [Reserved]

    Item 16A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert


    The Board determined that Mr. Gary Robertson is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act, and that Mr. Robertson is independent as defined in the NASDAQ listing rules.

    Item 16B.  Code of Ethics


    The Company has not currently adopted a code of ethics but is evaluating its internal procedures to determine the necessity of same.  In the event that it is determined that a code of ethics is necessary, an appropriate code will be implemented.

    Item 16C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services


    The independent auditor for the year ended January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009 was Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants. The independent auditor for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and January 31, 2007 was Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Accountants.


    Audit Fees


    The aggregate fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20092010 were $44,000.$38,500 and $44,000 for the year ended January 31, 2009. The fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008 were $75,000 and $66,000$75,000.
    58


    Audit-Related Fees

    The audit-related fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP for the year ended January 31, 2007.

    53


    Audit-Related Fees

    2010 are estimated to be $5,000. The audit-related fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP for the year ended January 31, 2009 are estimated to be $2,500.were $4,200. These fees relate to the advisory services provided with respect to the Company’s Form 20-F. The audit related fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP were $10,000 for the year ended January 31, 2008 and $4,750 for the year ended January 31, 2007.2008.  These fees related to the Company’s adoption of new accounting policies and advisory services provided with respect to the Company’s Form 20-F.


    Tax Fees


    The tax fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP for the yearyears ended January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009 were $1,500.$1,500 for each year. There were no aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2008 and 2007.


    All Other Fees


    The aggregate fees billed for all other professional services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm were nil for the fiscal years ended January 31, 20092010 and 2008.

    2009.


    The Audit Committee approved 100% of the fees paid to the principal accountant for audit-related, tax and other fees in the fiscal year 2009.2010.  The Audit Committee pre-approves all non-audit services to be performed by the auditor in accordance with the Audit Committee Charter.  The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the Company’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was 0%.


    Item 16D.  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees


    Not applicable.


    Item 16E.  Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers


    None.


    Item 16F.  Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant

    None.

    Item 16G.  Corporate Governance

    Not applicable.
    59

    PART III

    Item 17.  Financial Statements


    The following Financial Statements pertaining to the Company are filed as part of this annual report:

    60

    Item 18.   Financial Statements


    Not applicable. See Item 17.

    54


    Item 19.   Exhibits


    Exhibit Number
    Name
    1.1Memorandum of Coral Gold Resources Ltd.*
    1.2.1.2Articles of Coral Gold Resources Ltd.*
    8.1List of Subsidiaries
    12.1Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
    12.2Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
    13.1Certificate of Principal Executive Officer under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    13.2Certificate of Principal Financial Officer under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    13.3Consent of Expert
    13.4Consent of Expert
    13.5Consent of Expert
    13.6Consent of Expert
    15.1Geological Report on the Robertson Property*
    15.2Update of the Geological Report on the Robertson Property*

    _________________________________________

    ___________________________
    *  Previously filed.

    55

    61


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD.
    (an Exploration Stage Company)



    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (in Canadian Dollars)
    62


    MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING



    The consolidated financial statements of Coral Gold Resources Ltd. are the responsibility of the Company’s management. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”) of Canada and reflect management’s best estimates and judgment based on information currently available.


    Management has developed and is maintaining a system of internal controls to ensure that the Company’s assets are safeguarded, transactions are authorized and properly recorded and financial information is reliable.


    The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring management fulfills its responsibilities. The Audit Committee reviews the results of the audit and the annual consolidated financial statements prior to their submission to the Board of Directors for approval.


    The consolidated financial statements as at and for the yearyears ended January 31, 2010 and 2009 have been audited by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, and their report outlines the scope of their examination and gives their opinion on the consolidated financial statements.

    “Louis Wolfin” 
    Louis Wolfin”   “Lisa Sharp”
    Louis Wolfin Lisa Sharp
    CEO CFO
    Vancouver, Canada
    May 26, 2010

    Vancouver, British Columbia
    May 21, 2009

    56

    63


    AUDITORS’

                                                            
    REPORT

    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD.
    (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

    (An Exploration Stage Company)

    We have audited the consolidated balance sheetsheets of Coral Gold Resources Ltd. (an Exploration Stage Company) as at January 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the yearyears then ended, and for the period January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2009.ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

    audits.


    We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.


    In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at January 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the yearyears then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.


    The consolidated financial statements as at January 31, 2008, for the yearsyear ended January 31, 2008 and 2007, and for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2008 were audited by other auditors whose report dated May 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. Our opinion on the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2009, insofar as it relates to amounts for prior periods through January 31, 2008 is based solely on the report of other auditors.



    “Smythe Ratcliffe LLP” (signed)

    Chartered Accountants


    Vancouver, British Columbia
    Canada
    May 21, 2009

    7thFloor, Marine BuildingFax:604.688.4675
    355 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BCTelephone:604.687.1231
    Canada V6C 2G8Web:SmytheRatcliffe.com

    57

    26, 2010
    64

    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



    To the Shareholders of
    Coral Gold Resources Ltd.
    (an exploration stage company)



    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets ofCoral Gold Resources Ltd. (an exploration stage company)as at January 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended January 31, 2008, and for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and mineral properties for each of the years in the three year period ended January 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. The consolidated financial statementsstatem ents for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and whose report dated April 13, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. The consolidated financial statements for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2005 included total revenues and net loss of $2,176,079 and $20,510,872, respectively. Our opinion on the consolidated statements of loss and deficit and cash flows for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2008, insofar as it relates to amounts for prior periods through January 31, 2005 is based solely on the report of other auditors.


    We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting theth e amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


    In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at January 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended January 31, 2008 and for the period from January 22, 1981 (inception) through January 31, 2008 in conformity with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

    Vancouver, Canada,/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
    May 27, 2008Chartered Accountants

    58

    65


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (an Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    As at January 31


      2010  2009 
           
    ASSETS      
    Current      
    Cash $700,772  $1,332,316 
    Advances receivable from related party (Note 9)  18,354   16,899 
    Other amounts receivable  13,617   9,747 
    Prepaid expenses  4,694   5,854 
             
       737,437   1,364,816 
    Investment securities (Note 4)  610,967   78,803 
    Reclamation deposits (Note 7)  408,075   477,550 
    Equipment (Note 5)  5,873   7,544 
    Mineral properties (Note 6)  16,029,214   15,704,913 
      $17,791,566  $17,633,626 
             
    LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
    Current        
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $65,494  $64,334 
    Advances payable to related parties (Note 9)  23,022   70,084 
    Asset retirement obligation (Note 10)  -   270,979 
       88,516   405,397 
    Asset retirement obligation (Note 10)  236,248   - 
    Future income tax liability (Note 13)  1,687,363   4,963,038 
             
       2,012,127   5,368,435 
             
    Non-controlling interest  10,320   10,320 
             
    Shareholders' equity        
    Share capital (Note 8)  40,742,124   40,301,644 
    Contributed surplus  5,857,421   4,960,907 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  425,695   (39,948)
    Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage  (31,256,121)  (32,967,732)
             
       15,769,119   12,254,871 
      $17,791,566  $17,633,626 

    Nature of Operations and Going Concern (Note 1)
    Subsequent Events (Note 15)

    Approved on behalf of the board:

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (an Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    As at January 31

      2009  2008 
         (Note 16)
     ASSETS      
     Current      
     Cash$ 1,332,316 $ 3,602,089 
     Advances receivable from related parties (Note 9) 16,899  13,808 
     Interest and other amounts receivable 9,747  55,615 
     Prepaid expenses 5,854  3,163 
           
      1,364,816  3,674,675 
           
     Investment securities (Note 4) 78,803  167,282 
     Equipment (Note 5) 7,544  2,327 
     Mineral properties (Note 6) 15,704,913  14,021,301 
     Reclamation deposit (Note 7) 477,550  320,103 
           
     $ 17,633,626 $ 18,185,688 
           
           
     LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
     Current      
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$ 64,334 $ 121,368 
     Advances payable to related parties (Note 9) 70,084  36,499 
     Asset retirement obligation (Note 10) 270,979  194,361 
           
      405,397  352,228 
     Future income tax liability (Note 13) 4,963,038  3,562,808 
           
      5,368,435  3,915,036 
           
     Non-controlling interest 10,320  10,320 
           
     Shareholders’ equity      
     Share capital (Note 8) 40,301,644  40,211,705 
     Contributed surplus 4,960,907  3,221,663 
     Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (39,948) 48,531 
     Deficit (32,967,732) (29,221,567)
           
      12,254,871  14,260,332 
           
     $ 17,633,626 $ 18,185,688 
           
    Nature of Operations and Going Concern (Note 1)      
    Commitment (Note 15)      
    Subsequent Event (Note 17)      

    Approved by the Directors:

    “Louis Wolfin”Director“Gary Robertson”Director
    Louis Wolfin Gary Robertson 

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

    59

    66

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (an Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Years ended January 31


      2010  2009  2008 
              
    EXPENSES         
    Amortization $1,671  $1,703  $581 
    Consulting fees (Note 9)  53,627   60,000   33,680 
    Directors’ fees (Note 9)  18,000   12,000   12,000 
    Investor relations and shareholder information  112,005   155,206   144,108 
    Legal and accounting  66,313   114,236   438,377 
    Listing and filing fees  22,866   25,919   76,995 
    Management fees (Note 9)  95,250   105,000   134,490 
    Office and miscellaneous (Note 9)  64,931   72,278   58,361 
    Salaries and benefits (Note 9)  104,365   128,925   104,235 
    Stock-based compensation (Note 8(e))  1,038,289   1,769,263   310,246 
    Travel  36,396   72,332   46,099 
       1,613,713   2,516,862   1,359,172 
    Loss before other items  (1,613,713)  (2,516,862)  (1,359,172)
    Other items            
    Interest income  2,618   69,764   165,004 
    Foreign exchange gain (loss)  464,851   (765,770)  519,722 
    Write-down of advances payable to related parties (Note 9)  17,000   -   - 
    Write-down of advances receivable  -   -   (24,029)
       484,469   (696,006)  (4,455,354)
    Loss for the year before future income
        taxes
      (1,129,244)  (3,212,868)  (698,475)
    Future income tax recovery (expense) (Note 13)  2,840,855   (533,297)  (620,710)
    Net Income (Loss) for the Year  1,711,611   (3,746,165)  (1,319,185)
    Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)            
    Unrealized gain (loss) on investment
        securities, net of tax (Note 4)
      465,643   (88,479)  (19,352)
    Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Year $2,177,255  $(3,834,644) $(1,338,537)
                 
    Basic and diluted            
        earnings (loss) per share (Note 8(f))
     $0.07  $(0.15) $(0.06)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Years ended January 31

     For the period from          
      inception on          
        January 22, 1981 to          
      January 31, 2009  2009  2008  2007 
      (Note 16)    (Note 16)   
    REVENUE            
    Sales$ 2,176,079 $ - $ - $ - 
    Cost of Sales (5,383,348)         
      (3,207,269) -  -  - 
    EXPENSES            
    Administrative services 1,058,598  -  -  - 
    Amortization 5,738  1,703  581  726 
    Consulting fees 453,883  60,000  33,680  132,675 
    Directors’ fees 161,763  12,000  12,000  62,000 
    Investor relations and shareholder information 2,335,914  155,206  144,108  135,120 
    Legal and accounting 3,634,394  114,236  438,377  482,017 
    Listing and filing fees 338,894  25,919  76,995  46,649 
    Management fees 726,205  105,000  134,490  132,215 
    Office and miscellaneous 2,263,980  72,278  58,361  96,729 
    Salaries and benefits 1,241,867  128,925  104,235  86,948 
    Stock-based compensation 4,227,551  1,769,263  310,246  748,409 
    Travel 1,110,102  72,332  46,099  60,477 
      17,558,889  2,516,862  1,359,172  1,983,965 
    Loss before other items: (20,766,158) (2,516,862) (1,359,172) (1,983,965)
    Other items            
    Interest income 1,233,480  69,764  165,004  144,422 
    Foreign exchange gain (loss) 109,283  (765,770) 519,722  (115,024)
    Gain realized on disposition of option on property 143,552  -  -  - 
    Gain on sale of investment securities 17,692  -  -  - 
    Write-down of advances receivable (438,472) -  (24,029) (66,120)
    Financing costs (341,006) -  -  - 
    Write-down of investment securities (838,485) -  -  (28,657)
    Loss on equipment disposals (32,784) -  -  - 
    Write-down of equipment (16,335) -  -  - 
    Write-down of mineral properties (7,110,148) -  -  - 
      (7,273,223) (696,006) 660,697  (65,379)
    Loss for the year before future income            
       taxes and non-controlling interest (28,039,381) (3,212,868) (698,475) (2,049,344)
    Future income tax expense (Note 13) (4,928,340) (533,297) (620,710) (479,270)
    Non-controlling interest (11) -  -  - 
    Net Loss for the Year (32,967,732) (3,746,165) (1,319,185) (2,528,614)
    Other Comprehensive Income            
    Unrealized loss on investment            
       securities (Note 4) (39,948) (88,479) (19,352) - 
    Total Comprehensive Loss$ (33,007,680)$ (3,834,644)$ (1,338,537)$ (2,528,614)
                 
    Basic and diluted            
       Loss per share   $ (0.15)$ (0.06)$ (0.13)
    Weighted average number of            
       common shares outstanding    24,979,312  23,570,728  19,857,210 

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

    60

    67

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (an Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Years ended January 31


      Number of Common Shares  Share Capital  
    Contributed
     Surplus
      
    Accumulated
    Other
    Comprehensive
    Income (Loss)
      
    Deficit Accumulated During the
    Exploration Stage
      Total Shareholders’ Equity 
                       
    Balance, January 31, 2007  20,497,080  $36,706,478  $2,096,750  $-  $(27,902,382) $10,900,846 
    Transitional adjustment for fair value of investment securities  -   -   -   67,883   -   67,883 
    Common shares issued for cash:                        
        Private placement  4,230,000   3,369,900   860,100   -   -   4,230,000 
        Exercise of warrants  20,691   13,794   -   -   -   13,794 
        Exercise of stock options  135,000   76,100   -   -   -   76,100 
    Fair value of stock options exercised  -   40,840   (40,840)  -   -   - 
    Fair value of warrants exercised  -   4,593   (4,593)  -   -   - 
    Stock-based compensation  -   -   310,246   -   -   310,246 
    Loss for the year  -   -   -   -   (1,319,185)  (1,319,185)
    Unrealized loss on investment securities  -   -   -   (19,352)  -   (19,352)
                             
    Balance January 31, 2008  24,882,771   40,211,705   3,221,663   48,531   (29,221,567)  14,260,332 
    Common shares issued for cash:                        
        Exercise of stock options  107,000   59,920   -   -   -   59,920 
    Fair value of stock options exercised  -   30,019   (30,019)  -   -   - 
    Stock-based compensation  -   -   1,769,263   -   -   1,769,263 
    Loss for the year  -   -   -   -   (3,746,165)  (3,746,165)
    Unrealized loss on investment securities  -   -   -   (88,479)  -   (88,479)
                             
    Balance January 31, 2009  24,989,771   40,301,644   4,960,907   (39,948)  (32,967,732)  12,254,871 
    Common shares issued for cash:                        
        Exercise of stock options  523,500   293,160   -   -   -   293,160 
    Fair value of stock options exercised  -   147,320   (147,320)  -   -   - 
    Stock-based compensation  -   -   1,038,289   -   -   1,038,289 
    Fair value of stock options capitalized to
        mineral properties
      -   -   5,545   -   -   5,545 
    Net income for the year  -   -   -   -   1,711,611   1,711,611 
    Unrealized gain on investment securities, net of tax  -   -   -   465,643   -   465,643 
                             
    Balance January 31, 2010  25,513,271  $40,742,124  $5,857,421  $425,695  $(31,256,121) $15,769,119 

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Years ended January 31

                     Accumulated    
      Number of        Subscriptions     Other  Total 
      Common     Contributed  Received in     Comprehensive  Shareholders’ 
      Shares  Share Capital  Surplus  Advance  Deficit  Income (Loss)  Equity 
    Balance, January 31, 2006 5,106,266 $31,560,337 $1,428,173 $ 60,000 $(25,373,768)$ - $ 7,674,742 
    Common shares issued for cash:                     
       Private placement 1,500,000  4,500,000  -  (60,000) -  -  4,440,000 
       Exercise of warrants 191,194  527,888  -  -  -  -  527,888 
       Exercise of stock options 36,900  66,430  -  -  -  -  66,430 
       Shares returned to treasury (2,000) (11,000) -  -  -  -  (11,000)
       Share issue costs -  (17,009) -  -  -  -  (17,009)
    Fair value of stock options exercised -  35,147  (35,147) -  -  -  - 
    Fair value of warrants exercised -  44,685  (44,685) -  -  -  - 
    Stock-based compensation -  -  748,409  -  -  -  748,409 
    Loss for the year -  -  -  -  (2,528,614) -  (2,528,614)
    Balance, January 31, 2007 6,832,360  36,706,478  2,096,750  -  (27,902,382) -  10,900,846 
    Stock split on a 3 for 1 basis 13,664,720  -  -  -  -  -  - 
      20,497,080  36,706,478  2,096,750  -  (27,902,382) -  10,900,846 
    Transitional adjustment for fair value of                     
         investment securities -  -  -  -  -  67,883  67,883 
    Common shares issued for cash:                     
       Private placement 4,230,000  3,369,900  860,100  -  -  -  4,230,000 
       Exercise of warrants 20,691  13,794  -  -  -  -  13,794 
       Exercise of stock options 135,000  76,100  -  -  -  -  76,100 
    Fair value of stock options exercised -  40,840  (40,840) -  -  -  - 
    Fair value of warrants exercised -  4,593  (4,593) -  -  -  - 
    Stock-based compensation -  -  310,246  -  -  -  310,246 
    Loss for the year -  -  -  -  (1,319,185)    (1,319,185)
    Unrealized loss on investment securities -  -  -  -  -  (19,352) (19,352)
    Balance January 31, 2008 24,882,771  40,211,705  3,221,663  -  (29,221,567) 48,531  14,260,332 
    Common shares issued for cash:                     
       Exercise of stock options 107,000  59,920  -  -  -  -  59,920 
    Fair value of stock options exercised -  30,019  (30,019) -  -  -  - 
    Stock-based compensation -  -  1,769,263  -  -  -  1,769,263 
    Loss for the year -  -  -  -  (3,746,165) -  (3,746,165)
    Unrealized loss on investment securities -  -  -  -  -  (88,479) (88,479)
    Balance January 31, 2009 24,989,771 $40,301,644 $4,960,907 $ - $(32,967,732)$ (39,948)$12,254,871 

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

    61

    68

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (an Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Year ended January 31


      2010  2009  2008 
              
    OPERATING ACTIVITIES         
    Net income (loss) for the year $1,711,611  $(3,746,165) $(1,319,185)
    Adjustments for items not involving cash:            
        Amortization  1,671   1,703   581 
        Stock-based compensation  1,038,289   1,769,263   310,246 
        Foreign exchange (gain) loss  (473,492)  908,329   (577,162)
    Write-down of advances payable to related parties  (17,000)  -   - 
        Write-down of advances receivable  -   -   24,029 
        Future income tax (recovery) expense  (2,840,855)  533,297   620,710 
    Net change in non-cash working capital (Note 12)  5,657   (24,160)  (260,860)
                 
    Cash used in operating activities  (574,119)  (557,733)  (1,201,641)
                 
    INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
    Mineral properties acquisition and
        exploration expenditures
      (357,480)  (1,609,696)  (2,074,001)
    Purchase of equipment  -   (6,920)  - 
    Decrease (increase) in reclamation deposits  8,268   (157,447)  12,126 
                 
    Cash used In investing activities  (349,212)  (1,774,063)  (2,061,875)
                 
    FINANCING ACTIVITY            
    Issuance of shares for cash, net  293,160   59,920   4,319,894 
                 
    Cash provided by financing activity  293,160   59,920   4,319,894 
                 
    Foreign exchange effect on cash  (1,373)  2,103   - 
                 
    Net increase (decrease) in cash  (631,544)  (2,269,773)  1,056,378 
    Cash, beginning of year  1,332,316   3,602,089   2,545,711 
                 
    Cash, end of year $700,772  $1,332,316  $3,602,089 
    Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Year ended January 31
    Cash paid during the year for:
        Interest $1,940  $2,795  $333 
        Income taxes $-  $-  $- 
    Expenditures on mineral properties  included in advances payable to related parties $2,073  $40,797  $- 

      For the period from          
      inception on January          
      22, 1981 to January          
      31, 2009  2009  2008  2007 
            (Note 16)   
     OPERATING ACTIVITIES            
     Loss for the period$ (32,967,732)$ (3,746,165)$(1,319,185)$(2,528,614)
     Adjustments for items not involving cash:            
           Amortization 5,738  1,703  581  726 
           Write-down of equipment 16,335  -  -  - 
           Stock based compensation 4,227,551  1,769,263  310,246  748,409 
           Non-controlling interest 11  -  -  - 
           Future income tax expense 4,928,340  533,297  620,710  479,270 
           Write-down of investment securities 838,485  -  -  28,657 
           Write-down of mineral properties 7,110,148  -  -  - 
           Write-down of advances receivable 438,472  -  24,029  66,120 
           Loss on equipment disposals 32,784  -  -  - 
           Gain on sale of investment securities (17,692) -  -  - 
           Gain realized on disposition of option on property (143,552) -  -  - 
           Gain (loss) on foreign exchange (300,597) 908,329  (577,162) 89,877 
     Net change in non-cash working capital (Note 12) (366,524) (24,160) (260,860) (359,733)
                 
     Cash Used in Operating Activities (16,198,233) (557,733) (1,201,641) (1,475,288)
                 
     INVESTING ACTIVITIES            
     Mineral properties acquisition and            
           exploration expenditures incurred (21,367,567) (1,609,696) (2,074,001) (1,660,128)
     Acquisition of Marcus Corporation (14,498) -  -  - 
     Proceeds on sale of equipment 92,732  -  -  - 
     Repayment of loan receivable          83,000 
     Purchase of equipment (152,405) (6,920) -  - 
     Purchase of investments (1,058,950) -  -  - 
     Decrease (increase) in reclamation deposit (477,550) (157,447) 12,126  (71,253)
     Cash Used In Investing Activities (22,978,238) (1,774,063) (2,061,875) (1,648,381)
     FINANCING ACTIVITY            
     Issuance of shares for cash, net 40,477,555  59,920  4,319,894  5,006,309 
     Cash Provided By Financing Activity 40,477,555  59,920  4,319,894  5,006,309 
                 
     Foreign Exchange Effect on Cash Held in a            
           Foreign Currency 2,103  2,103  -  - 
     Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash 1,303,187  (2,269,773) 1,056,378  1,882,640 
     Cash, beginning of year 29,129  3,602,089  2,545,711  663,071 
     Cash, end of year$ 1,332,316 $ 1,332,316 $ 3,602,089 $ 2,545,711 
                 
    Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:            
    Cash paid during the year for:            
     Interest paid   $ 2,795 $ 333 $ 57 
     Income taxes paid   $ - $ - $ - 
     Expenditures on mineral property interests            
           included in advances payable to related party   $ 40,797 $ - $ - 

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

    62

    69

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    1.             Nature of Operations and Going Concern

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Coral Gold Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the Company Act of British Columbia and is primarily involved in the exploration and development of its mineral properties.

    1.

    Nature of Operations and Going Concern

    Coral Gold Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) was incorporated under theCompany Actof British Columbia and is primarily involved in the exploration and development of its mineral properties.

    The business of mining and exploring for minerals involves a high degree of risk and there can be no assurance that current exploration programs will result in profitable mining operations. The recoverability of the carrying value of mineral properties and the Company’s continued existence is dependent upon the preservation of its interest in the underlying properties, the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the achievement of profitable operations, or the ability of the Company to raise alternative financing. Changes in future conditions could require material write-downs of the carrying values.

    At January 31, 2009, the Company had working capital of $959,419 (2008 - $3,322,447) and an accumulated deficit of $32,967,732 (2008 - $29,221,567). Management of the Company believes that it has sufficient funds to pay its ongoing administrative expenses and meet its liabilities for the ensuing year as they fall due, to fund cash payments for administration, ongoing commitments and current planned exploration programs.

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies

    a)

    Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

    These audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”), which are in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”), except as described in Note 18 to these consolidated financial statements. All figures are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

    These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned integrated subsidiaries, Coral Resources, Inc. and Coral Energy Corporation of California and its 98.49% owned integrated subsidiary Marcus Corporation of Nevada. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

    b)

    Equipment

    Equipment is recorded at historical cost less accumulated amortization. Using the following methods, amortization is calculated and charged to operations as follows:

    These consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.  Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

    The business of mining and exploring for minerals involves a high degree of risk and there can be no assurance that current exploration programs will result in profitable mining operations. The recoverability of the carrying value of mineral properties and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the preservation of its interest in the underlying properties, the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, the achievement of profitable operations, or the ability of the Company to raise alternative financing (note 15).

    At January 31, 2010, the Company had working capital of $648,921 (2009 - $959,419) and a deficit accumulated during the exploration stage of $31,256,121 (2009 - $32,967,732). Management of the Company believes that it has sufficient funds to meet its liabilities for the ensuing year as they fall due, and to fund cash payments for administration, ongoing commitments and current planned exploration programs.

    2.             Significant Accounting Policies

    a) Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

    These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”), which are in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”), except as described in Note 16 to these consolidated financial statements. All figures are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated.

    These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned integrated subsidiaries, Coral Resources, Inc. and Coral Energy Corporation of California and its 98.49% owned integrated subsidiary Marcus Corporation of Nevada (“Marcus”). Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

    b) Equipment

    Equipment is recorded at historical cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is calculated and charged to operations as follows:

    Computer HardwareDeclining balance on 20% annual rate
    EquipmentDeclining balance on 20% annual rate
    VehiclesStraight line over 5 years

    63


    70


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    2.             Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    c) Mineral Properties

    The Company is in the exploration stage and capitalizes all expenditures related to its mineral properties until such time as the properties are put into commercial production, sold or abandoned. Under this method, all amounts shown as mineral properties represent costs incurred to date, including acquisition costs, exploration and development expenditures, net of any recoveries and do not necessarily reflect present or future values.

    The costs are deferred until such time as the extent of mineralization has been determined and mineral property interests are either developed, sold or the Company’s mineral rights are allowed to lapse. If the properties are put into commercial production, the expenditures will be depleted based upon the proven and probable reserves available. If the properties are sold or abandoned, the expenditures will be charged to operations. The Company does not accrue the estimated future costs, such as land taxes, of maintaining its mineral properties in good standing.

    From time to time the Company may acquire or dispose of a mineral property interest pursuant to the terms of an option agreement. As the options are exercisable entirely at the discretion of the optionee, the amounts payable or receivable are not recorded. Option payments are recorded as property costs or recoveries when the payments are made or received.  Proceeds received on the sale or option of the Company’s property is recorded as a reduction of the mineral property cost.  The Company recognizes in income those costs that are recovered on mineral properties when amounts received or receivable are in excess of the carrying amount.

    The carrying values of mineral properties, on a property-by-property basis, are reviewed by management at least annually to determine if the mineral properties have become impaired. If impairment is deemed to exist, the mineral property will be written down to its fair value. The ultimate recoverability of the amounts capitalized for the mineral properties is dependent upon the delineation of economically recoverable ore reserves and the Company’s ability to obtain the necessary financing to complete their development and realize profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof. Management’s estimates of recoverability of the Company’s investment in various projects have been based on current conditions. However, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely a ffect management’s estimates and may result in future write-downs of capitalized mineral property carrying values.

    d) Asset Retirement Obligation (“ARO”)

    The Company’s proposed and incurred mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations for federal and regional jurisdictions, in which it operates, governing the protection of the environment. These laws are continually changing. The Company believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company expects to make, in the future, expenditures that comply with such laws and regulations but cannot predict the full amount or timing of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. Reclamation and remediation obligations arise from the acquisition, development, construction and normal operations of mining properties, plant and equipment.
    71


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    2.             Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    d) Asset Retirement Obligation (“ARO”) continued

    The Company recognizes an estimate of the liability associated with an ARO in the consolidated financial statements at the time the liability is incurred. The estimated fair value of the ARO is recorded as a long-term liability, with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset. The capitalized amount is depleted using consistent rates and methods as applicable to the corresponding asset. The liability amount is increased each reporting period due to the passage of time and the amount of accretion is charged to earnings in the period. The ARO can also increase or decrease due to changes in the estimates of timing of cash flows or changes in the original estimated undiscounted cost. Actual costs incurred upon settlement of the ARO are charged against the ARO to the extent of the liability recorded.

    e) Income Taxes

    The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method of tax allocation, future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying values and their respective income tax basis (temporary differences). Future income tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are likely to reverse. The effect on future income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is included in operations in the period in which the change is enacted or substantively enacted. The amount of future income tax assets recognized is limited to the amount of the benefit that is more likely than not to be realized.

    f) Foreign Currency Translation

    The Company’s integrated foreign subsidiaries are financially and operationally dependent on the Company.  The Company uses the temporal method to translate the accounts of its integrated foreign operations into Canadian dollars.  Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date for monetary items and at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction dates for non-monetary items. Revenues and expenses are translated at the exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date except for amortization, which is translated at historical exchange rates. Gains and losses arising from this translation are included in the determination of net loss for the year.

    g) Use of Estimates

    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include the fair value of financial instruments the recoverability of mineral property interests, balances of accrued liabilities, fair value of ARO, the assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of stock-based compensation and the valuation allowance for future income taxes.  Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates and could impact future results of operations and cash flows.
    72

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    2.             Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    h) Stock-Based Compensation

    The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using a fair value based method with respect to all stock-based payments measured and recognized, to directors, employees and non-employees. For directors and employees, the fair value of the options is measured at the date of grant. For non-employees, the fair value of the options is measured on the earlier of the date at which the counterparty performance is completed or the date the performance commitment is reached or the date at which the equity instruments are granted if they are fully vested and non-forfeitable. The fair value of the options is accrued and charged either to operations or mineral properties, with the offset credit to contributed surplus. For directors and employees the options are recognized over the vesting period, and for non-employees the options are recognize d over the related service period. If and when the stock options are ultimately exercised, the applicable amounts of contributed surplus are transferred to share capital.

    i) Earnings (Loss) Per Share

    Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The Company uses the treasury stock method for calculating diluted earnings per share. Under this method, the dilutive effect on earnings per share is calculated presuming the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and similar instruments. It assumes that the proceeds of such exercises would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. However, the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share excludes the effects of various conversions and exercise of options and warrants that would be anti-dilutive.

    j) Accounting for Equity Units

    Proceeds received on the issuance of units, consisting of common shares and warrants, are first allocated to warrants and recorded to contributed surplus based on their fair value calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the remainder is allocated to share capital.

    k) Financial Instruments

    All financial instruments are classified as one of the following: held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, held-for-trading, available-for-sale or other financial liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities held-for-trading are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized in net income (loss). Financial assets held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Available-for-sale instruments are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in shareholders’ equity.  Any financial instrument may be designated as held-for-trading upon initial recognition.
    73


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    2.             Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

    k) Financial Instruments (Continued)

    The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) Handbook Section 3862, “Financial Instruments – Disclosures”, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value as follows:

    Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

    Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and

    Level 3 – inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

    These disclosures are not required when the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of the fair value.

    Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of financial instruments that are classified as other than held-for-trading, which are expensed as incurred, are included in the initial carrying value of such instruments.

    l) Future Accounting Changes

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    2.(i)  

    Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)

    c)

    Mineral Properties

    The Company is in the exploration stage and defers all expenditures related to its mineral properties until such time as the properties are put into commercial production, sold or abandoned. Under this method, all amounts shown as mineral properties represent costs incurred to date, including acquisition costs, exploration and development expenditures, net of any recoveries. These amounts represent costs incurred to date and do not necessarily reflect present of future values.

    The costs are deferred until such time as the extent of mineralization has been determined and mineral property interests are either developed or the Company’s mineral rights are allowed to lapse. If the properties are put into commercial production, the expenditures will be depleted based upon the proven and probable reserves available. If the properties are sold or abandoned, the expenditures will be charged to operations. The Company does not accrue the estimated future costs, such as land taxes, of maintaining its mineral properties in good standing.

    The carrying values of mineral properties, on a property-by-property basis, are reviewed by management at least annually to determine if the mineral properties have become impaired. If impairment is deemed to exist, the mineral property will be written down to its fair value. The ultimate recoverability of the amounts capitalized for the mineral properties is dependent upon the delineation of economically recoverable ore reserves and the Company’s ability to obtain the necessary financing to complete their development and realize profitable production or proceeds from the disposition thereof. Management’s estimates of recoverability of the Company’s investment in various projects have been based on current conditions. However, it is reasonably possible that changes could occur in the near term which could adversely affect management’s estimates and may result in future write-downs of capitalized property carrying values.

    d)

    Asset Retirement Obligation (“ARO”)

    The Company recognizes an estimate of the liability associated with an ARO in the consolidated financial statements at the time the liability is incurred. The estimated fair value of the ARO is recorded as a long-term liability, with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset. The capitalized amount is depleted on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the asset. The liability amount is increased each reporting period due to the passage of time and the amount of accretion is charged to earnings in the period. The ARO can also increase or decrease due to changes in the estimates of timing of cash flows or changes in the original estimated undiscounted cost. Actual costs incurred upon settlement of the ARO are charged against the ARO to the extent of the liability recorded.

    e)

    Income Taxes

    The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method of tax allocation, future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying values and their respective income tax basis (temporary differences). Future income tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are likely to reverse. The effect on future income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is included in operations in the period in which the change is enacted or substantially assured. The amount of future income tax assets recognized is limited to the amount of the benefit that is more likely than not to be realized.

    64



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)

    f)

    Foreign Currency Translation

    The Company’s integrated foreign subsidiaries are financially and operationally dependent on the Company. The Company uses the temporal method to translate the accounts of its integrated foreign operations into Canadian dollars. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date for monetary items and at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction dates for non-monetary items. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate prevailing during the year except for amortization, which is translated at historical exchange rates. Gains and losses arising from this translation are included in the determination of net loss for the year.

    g)

    Use of Estimates

    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include the recoverability of mineral property interests, estimated balances of accrued liabilities, valuation of asset retirement obligation, the assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of stock-based compensation and the determination of the valuation allowance for future income taxes. Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates and could impact future results of operations and cash flows.

    h)

    Stock-Based Compensation

    The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using a fair value based method with respect to all stock-based payments measured and recognized, to directors, employees and non-employees. For directors and employees, the fair value of the options is measured at the date of grant. For non-employees, the fair value of the options is measured on the earlier of the date at which the counterparty performance is completed or the date the performance commitment is reached or the date at which the equity instruments are granted if they are fully vested and non-forfeitable. The fair value of the options is accrued and charged either to operations or mineral properties, with the offset credit to contributed surplus. For directors and employees the options are recognized over the vesting period, and for non-employees the options are recognized over the related service period. If and when the stock options are ultimately exercised, the applicable amounts of contributed surplus are transferred to share capital.

    i)

    Loss Per Share

    Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The Company uses the treasury stock method for calculating diluted earnings per share. Under this method, the dilutive effect on earnings per share is recognized on the use of the proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options, warrants and similar instruments. It assumes that the proceeds would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. However, diluted loss per share is not presented where the effects on conversion and exercise of options and warrants would be anti- dilutive.

    j)

    Accounting for Equity Units

    Proceeds received on the issuance of units, consisting of common shares and warrants, are first allocated to warrants based on their fair value calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the remainder is allocated to common shares.

    65



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)

    k)

    Financial Instruments and Comprehensive Income

    All financial instruments are classified as one of the following: held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, held-for- trading, available-for-sale or other financial liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities held-for-trading are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized in net income. Financial assets held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Available-for-sale instruments are measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in shareholders’ equity. Any financial instrument may be designated as held-for-trading upon initial recognition.

    Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of financial instruments that are classified as other than held-for-trading, which are expensed as incurred, are included in the initial carrying value of such instruments.

    Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity from transactions and other events from sources other than the Company’s shareholders. Other comprehensive income or loss refers to items recognized in comprehensive income or loss that are excluded from operations calculated in accordance with Canadian GAAP.

    l)

    New Accounting Standards

    Effective February 1, 2008, the Company adopted the following standards of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) Handbook:


    (i)

    Capital Disclosures (Section 1535)

    Section 1535 specifies the disclosure of: (i) an entity’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing capital; (ii) quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital; (iii) whether the entity has complied with any capital requirements; and (iv) if it has not complied, the consequences of such non- compliance.

    As a result of the adoption of this standard, additional disclosure on the Company’s capital management strategy have been included in Note 11.

    (ii)

    Financial Instruments – Disclosures (Section 3862) and Financial Instruments – Presentation (Section 3863)

    Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Handbook Section 3861, “Financial Instruments – Disclosures and Presentation”, revising its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward its presentation requirements. These new sections place increased emphasis on disclosures about the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments and how the entity manages those risks.

    Section 3862 specifies disclosures that enable users to evaluate: (i) the significance of financial instruments for the entity’s financial position and performance; and (ii) the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed and how the entity manages those risks.

    As a result of the adoption of these standards, additional disclosures on the risks of certain financial instruments have been included in Note 3.

    66



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)


    l)

    New Accounting Standards(Continued)


    (iii)

    Going Concern

    In June 2007, the CICA amended Section 1400, “General Standards of Financial Statement Presentation”, which requires management to make an assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. When financial statements are not prepared on a going concern basis, that fact shall be disclosed together with the basis on which the consolidated financial statements are prepared and the reason why the company is not considered a going concern. The Company adopted this policy on February 1, 2008 with no significant effect on these consolidated financial statements.


    m)

    Recent Accounting Pronouncements


    (i)

    International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”("IFRS")

    In 2006,February 2008, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board (“AcSB”) published a new strategic planannounced that will significantly affect financial reporting requirements for Canadian companies. The AcSB strategic plan outlines the convergence of Canadian generally accepted accounting principles with IFRS over an expected five year transitional period. In February 2008, the AcSB announced thatJanuary 1, 2011 is the changeover date for publicly-listed companies to use IFRS, replacing Canada’sCanada's own generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP. The date isIFRS standards will be effective for the Company for interim and annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or afterperiod reporting commencing February 1, 2011. The transitioneffective date of February 1, 2011 will require the restatement for comparative purposes of amounts reported by the Company for the interim periods and for the year ended January 31, 2011. While2011 and earlier where applicable. The Company is currently in the Company has begun assessingplanning stages to identify the adoptionimpact of adopting IFRS for 2012,on its financial statements; at this time, the financial reporting impact of the transition to IFRS cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

    estimated.
    (ii)  
    (ii)

    Business Combinations

    In January 2009, (Section 1582); Consolidated Financial Statements (Section 1601); Non-Controlling Interests (Section 1602)

    These new standards are based on the CICA issued Section 1582, “Business Combinations”, Section 1601, “Consolidations”, and Section 1602, “Non-Controlling Interests”. These sections replace the former Section 1581,IFRS 3, “Business Combinations”, and Section 1600, “Consolidated Financial Statements”,replace the existing guidance on business combinations and establish aconsolidated financial statements. These new section for accounting for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary.

    Sections 1582standards require most assets acquired and 1602 will require net assets, non-controlling interests and goodwill acquired in a business combinationliabilities assumed, including contingent liabilities, to be recordedmeasured at fair value and all acquisition costs to be expensed, and also require non-controlling interests willto be reportedrecognized as a separate component of equity. In addition,equity and net earnings to be calculated without a deduction for non-controlling interests. The objective of these new standards is to harmonize Canadian accounting for business combinations with the definition of a business is expandedInternational and is described as an integrated set of activities and assets that are capable of being managed to provide a return to investors or economic benefits to owners. Acquisition costs are not part of the consideration andUnited States accounting standards. The new standards are to be expensed when incurred. Section 1601 establishes standards for the preparation of consolidated financial statements.

    67



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notesapplied prospectively to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    2.

    Significant Accounting Policies(Continued)


    m)

    Recent Accounting Pronouncements(Continued)


    (iii)

    Business Combinations (Continued)

    These new sections apply to the Company’s interim and annual consolidated financial statements relating to fiscal years beginningbusiness combinations on or after February 1, 2011. Earlier adoption of these sections is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. All three sections must be adopted concurrently.2011, with earlier application permitted. The Company is currently evaluatingCom pany has not yet determined the impact of the adoption of these sections.

    this change on its consolidated financial statements.
    3.           Risk Management and Financial Instruments

    3.

    Risk Management and Financial Instruments

    The Company classified its cash as held-for-trading; investment securities as available-for-sale; advances receivable from related parties, interest and other amounts and reclamation deposit as loans and receivable; and accounts payable and accrued liabilities and advances payable as other financial liabilities.

    The carrying values of cash, advances receivable from related parties, interest and other amounts, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and advances payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Investments securities are accounted for at market values. The book value of reclamation deposit approximates its fair value as the stated rate approximates the market rate of interest.

    The Company classified its cash as held-for-trading; investment securities as available-for-sale; advances receivable from related party, other amounts receivable (excluding GST) and reclamation deposits as loans and receivables; and accounts payable and advances payable to related parties as other financial liabilities.
    The carrying values of cash, other amounts receivable (excluding GST), and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. Investment securities are accounted for at fair value based on quoted market prices.  The book value of reclamation deposits approximate their fair value as the stated rates approximate the market rate of interest. The fair value of advances receivable from related parties and advances payable to related parties have not been disclosed as they cannot be reliably measured.
    The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy as at January 31, 2010 are as follows:

      Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
                 
    Financial Assets            
    Available-for-sale            
    Investment securities $610,967  $-  $-  $610,967 

    74

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    3.             Risk Management and Financial Instruments (Continued)
    The Company’s risk exposure and the impact on the Company’s financial instruments are summarized below:
    a) Credit Risk

    Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. The Company’s cash is exposed to credit risk. The Company is not exposed to significant credit risk on amounts receivable (excluding GST). The Company assesses the collectability of advances receivable from related parties on a periodic basis and records allowances for non-collection based on management’s assessment of specific accounts.

    The Company manages credit risk, in respect of cash, by maintaining the majority of cash at high credit rated Canadian financial institutions.

    Concentration of credit risk exists with respect to the Company’s cash and reclamation deposits as the majority of the amounts are held with a Canadian and US financial institution. The Company’s concentration of credit risk, and maximum exposure thereto, is as follows:

      2010  2009 
    Cash held at major financial institutions      
      Canada $695,910  $1,321,867 
      US  4,862   10,449 
             
       700,772   1,332,316 
    Reclamation deposits held at major financial institutions        
    US  408,075   477,550 
             
    Total cash and reclamation deposits $1,108,847  $1,809,866 

    b) Liquidity Risk

    Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in satisfying financial obligations as they become due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows required by operations and anticipated investing and financing activities.  The Company has cash at January 31, 2010 in the amount of $700,772 (2009 - $1,332,316) in order to meet short-term business requirements. At January 31, 2010, the Company had current liabilities of $88,516 (2009 - $134,418). Accounts payable have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms. Advances payable to related parties are without stated terms of interest or repayment.

    The Company will require significant cash funding to conduct its planned exploration programs, meet its administrative overhead costs, and maintain its mineral properties in 2011. This will require the Company to obtain additional financing in 2011.

    Subsequent to January 31, 2010, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement in two tranches raising gross proceeds of $3,850,066 from the issuance of 7,000,120 units at a price of $0.55 per unit (Note 15).
    75

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    3.             Risk Management and Financial Instruments (Continued)

    c) Market Risk

    Market risk consists of interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and other price risk. These are discussed further below:

    Interest Rate Risk

    Interest rate risk consists of two components:

    (i)  To the extent that payments made or received on the Company’s financial instrumentsmonetary assets and liabilities are summarized below:

    a)

    Credit Risk

    Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other partyaffected by failing to discharge an obligation. The Company’s cash is exposed to credit risk. Management considers credit risk on cash to be immaterial because the counterparties are highly rated Canadian banks.

    b)

    Liquidity Risk

    Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in obtaining funds to meet its commitments. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to provide reasonable assurance that it will have sufficient funds to meet liabilities when due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows required by operations and anticipated investing and financing activities. The Company has cash and cash equivalents at January 31, 2009changes in the amount of $1,332,316 in order to meet short-term business requirements. At January 31, 2009, the Company had current liabilities of $405,397. All of the Company’s financial liabilities have contractual maturities of less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms.

    c)

    Market Risk

    The significantprevailing market risks to whichinterest rates, the Company is exposed areto interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk and other pricecash flow risk. These are discussed further below:


    (ii)  

    Interest Rate Risk

    Interest rate risk isTo the riskextent that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in prevailing market rates differ from the interest rates. Therate in the Company’s reclamation bonds have fixed interest rates thereforemonetary assets and liabilities, the Company is exposed to interest rate price risk.

    68


    The Company is exposed to interest rate price risk with respect to reclamation deposits as they bear interest at fixed rates. Given the stated rates of interest approximate market rates, the Company is not exposed to significant interest rate price risk as at January 31, 2010 and 2009.

    Foreign Exchange Risk

    Foreign exchange risk is the risk that fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities are denominated in foreign currency.

    The Company is exposed to foreign currency risk with respect to cash, other amounts receivable, advances receivable from related party and accounts payable as a portion of these amounts are denominated in US dollars as follows:
      2010  2009 
    Cash $4,547  $8,519 
    Other amounts receivable  2,484   10,720 
    Advances receivable from related party  17,164   13,778 
    Reclamation deposits  382,482   389,360 
    Accounts payable  (5,084)  (1,005)
             
    Net exposure $401,593  $421,372 
             
    Canadian dollar equivalent $428,510  $506,365 
    Based on the above net exposures as at January 31, 2010, a 6% (2009 - 10%) change based on the prior year fluctuations in the Canadian/US exchange rate would impact the Company’s earnings by approximately $25,700 (2009 - $18,000).

    The Company manages foreign exchange risk my minimizing the value of financial instruments denominated in foreign currency.  The Company has not entered into any foreign currency contracts to mitigate this risk
    76

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    3.             Risk Management and Financial Instruments (Continued)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    c) Market Risk (Continued)

    3.

    Risk Management and Financial Instruments (Continued)

    c) Market Risk(Continued)

    Foreign Exchange Risk

    Foreign exchange risk is the risk that fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange fluctuation related to its mineral properties and expenditures thereon, and reclamation bonds held in the US. A significant change in the currency exchange rates between the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar could have an effect on the Company’s financial position results of operations, and cash flows. As at January 31, 2009, the Company held US cash balances totaling US$7,335 (2008 – US$87,400) and US$389,360 (2008 – US$319,400) in reclamation bonds which will offset the asset retirement obligation US$220,937 (2008 – US$193,934). Based on the above net exposures as at January 31, 2009, a 10% change in Canadian/US exchange rate will impact the Company’s earnings by approximately $18,000.

    Other Price Risk

    Other price risk is the risk that the fair or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or foreign currency risk.

    4.

    Investment Securities

    Other Price Risk

    Other price risk is the risk that the fair or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or foreign currency risk. The Company is exposed to other price risk with respect to its investment securities as they are carried at fair value based on quoted market prices.

    As at January 31, 2010, a 115.24% (2009 - 178.97%) fluctuation in the fair value of investment securities based on the weighted average volatility of the underlying shares over the prior year would impact the Company’s other comprehensive income by approximately $93,118 (2009 - $62,234).

    4.             Investment Securities

    At January 31, 2010, the Company held shares as follows:

      Number of Shares  Cost  Accumulated Unrealized Gains (Losses)  Fair Value 
                 
    Available-for-sale shares:            
    Levon Resources Ltd.  967,571  $77,117  $513,101  $590,218 
    Mill Bay Ventures Inc.  518,731   41,634   (20,885)  20,749 
                     
          $118,751  $492,216  $610,967 

    At January 31, 2009, the Company held shares as follows:

             Accumulated    
       Number of     Unrealized    
       Shares  Cost  Gains (losses)  Fair Value 
                  
     Available-for-sale shares:            
     Levon Resources Ltd. 967,571 $ 77,117 $ (19,063)$ 58,054 
     Mill Bay Ventures Inc. 518,731  41,634  (20,885) 20,749 
                  
         $ 118,751 $ (39,948)$ 78,803 

    At January 31, 2008, the Company held shares as follows:

             Accumulated    
       Number of     Unrealized    
       Shares  Cost  Gains (losses)  Fair Value 
                  
     Available-for-sale shares:            
     Levon Resources Ltd. 967,571 $ 77,117 $ 48,667 $ 125,784 
     Mill Bay Ventures Inc. 518,731  41,634  (136) 41,498 
                  
         $118,751 $ 48,531 $ 167,282 


      Number of Shares  Cost  Accumulated Unrealized Gains (Losses)  Fair Value 
                 
    Available-for-sale shares:            
    Levon Resources Ltd.  967,571  $77,117  $(19,063) $58,054 
    Mill Bay Ventures Inc.  518,731   41,634   (20,885)  20,749 
                     
          $118,751  $(39,948) $78,803 

    Levon Resources Ltd. (“Levon”) and Mill Bay Ventures Inc. (“Mill Bay”) have common directors with the Company.

    69


    During the year ended January 31, 2010, the Company recognized an unrealized gain of $532,164 (2009 - unrealized loss of $88,479; 2008 - unrealized loss of $19,352), which is included in other comprehensive income (loss).  Future income tax in the amount of $66,521 (2009 - $nil; 2008 - $nil) was recorded against the unrealized gain for an unrealized gain, net of tax in the amount of $465,643 (2009 - unrealized loss of $88,479; 2008 - unrealized loss of $19,352).
    77


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    5.             Equipment

    January 31, 2010 Cost  Accumulated Amortization  Net Book Value 
    Computer hardware $5,926  $4,537  $1,389 
    Equipment  436   335   101 
    Vehicles  6,920   2,537   4,383 
      $13,282  $7,409  $5,873 

    January 31, 2009 Cost  Accumulated Amortization  Net Book Value 
    Computer hardware $5,926  $4,190  $1,736 
    Equipment  436   310   126 
    Vehicles  6,920   1,238   5,682 
      $13,282  $5,738  $7,544 

    6.             Mineral Properties

      Robertson Property  Ruf and Norma Sass Claims  Other  Total 
                 
    Balance, January 31, 2008 $13,997,453  $23,845  $3  $14,021,301 
                     
    Exploration costs during year:                
    Assays  138,111   -   -   138,111 
    Consulting  372,187   -   -   372,187 
    Drilling  717,177   -   -   717,177 
    Field supplies and services  10,540   -   -   10,540 
    Lease payments  141,893   -   -   141,893 
    Mapping  3,949   -   -   3,949 
    Taxes, licenses and permits  89,131   -   -   89,131 
    Water analysis  833   -   -   833 
    Reclamation  209,791   -   -   209,791 
                     
    Balance, January 31, 2009  15,681,065   23,845   3   15,704,913 
                     
    Exploration costs during year:                
    Assays  2,049   -   -   2,049 
    Consulting  120,358   -   -   120,358 
    Lease payments  99,449   -   -   99,449 
    Taxes, licenses and permits  96,019   5,767   -   101,786 
    Water analysis  659   -   -   659 
                     
    Balance, January 31, 2010 $15,999,599  $29,612  $3  $16,029,214 

    78

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    6.             Mineral Properties (Continued)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)a)  
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)Robertson Property

    4.

    Investment Securities(Continued)

    During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company recognized an $88,479 (2008- $19,352) unrealized loss included in other comprehensive income (loss).

    5.

    Equipment


          Accumulated  Net Book 
     January 31, 2009 Cost  Amortization  Value 
     Computer hardware$5,926 $4,190 $1,736 
     Equipment 436  310  126 
     Vehicles 6,920  1,238  5,682 
      $13,282 $5,738 $7,544 
               
          Accumulated  Net Book 
     January 31, 2008 Cost  Amortization  Value 
     Computer hardware$ 5,926 $ 3,756 $ 2,170 
     Equipment 436  279  157 
      $ 6,362 $ 4,035 $ 2,327 

    70



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    6.

    Mineral Properties


          Ruf and       
       Robertson  Norma Sass       
       Property  Property  Other  Total 
                  
     Balance, January 31, 2007$11,737,367 $18,367 $ 3 $11,755,737 
                  
     Exploration costs incurred during            
     year:            
        Acquisition costs 258,603  -  -  258,603 
        Assays 90,101  -  -  90,101 
        Consulting 390,432  -  -  390,432 
        Drilling 1,081,658  -  -  1,081,658 
        Field supplies and services 981  -  -  981 
        Lease payments 105,241  -  -  105,241 
        Mapping 16,011  -  -  16,011 
        Taxes, licenses and permits 97,806  5,478  -  103,284 
        Water analysis 395  -  -  395 
        Reclamation 218,858  -  -  218,858 
     Balance, January 31, 2008 13,997,453  23,845  3  14,021,301 
                  
     Exploration costs incurred during            
     year:            
        Assays 138,111  -  -  138,111 
        Consulting 372,187  -  -  372,187 
        Drilling 717,177  -  -  717,177 
        Field supplies and services 10,540  -  -  10,540 
        Lease payments 141,893  -  -  141,893 
        Mapping 3,949  -  -  3,949 
        Taxes, licenses and permits 89,131  -  -  89,131 
        Water analysis 833  -  -  833 
        Reclamation 209,791  -  -  209,791 
     Balance, January 31, 2009$15,681,065 $23,845 $ 3 $15,704,913 

    Robertson Property

    The Company has certain interests in 724803 patented and unpatented loadlode mining claims located in the Bullion Mining District, Lander County, Nevada, subject to a net smelter returnreturns (“NSR”) on production ranging from 4% to 10%, and which certain leases provide for advance royalty payments. The Robertson group is comprised of three separate claim groups known as the Core Claims, (100% owned), the Carve-out Claims (39% carried interest) and the Ruf/Norma Sass/ Claims (66.67% owned).

    Ruf Claims.

    (i)  (i)

    Carve-outCore Claims – 39% carried100% interest

    By Agreement dated May 16, 1996, the Company granted Amax Gold Exploration Inc. (“Amax”) an option to purchase a 51% interest in 200 claims. Amax exercised the option by paying twice the amount the Company had incurred in exploration expenditures on the property. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company had its 49% converted to a 39% carried interest.

    71



    The Company holds an undivided interest in 561 patented and unpatented lode mining claims. The Company owns outright 485 of these claims of which 39 unpatented lode claims and two placer claims are owned by the Company’s 98.49% owned subsidiary Marcus.

    The remaining 76 claims are leased by the Company as follows:

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)(a)  
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)June Claims

    The Company entered a mineral lease and option-to-purchase agreement granting it the exclusive rights to explore, develop, and exploit six lode mining claims which form part of the core area of the Robertson Property.  The agreement is for an initial term of four years expiring March 22, 2012 in consideration of the payment of an annual rent of US$25,000, renewable in successive four-year terms, provided that the rent will increase by US$5,000 every four years.

    The property is subject to a NSR royalty charge of 3%, subject to the Company’s exclusive right to purchase the NSR for US$1,000,000 per percentage point.  The Company also has the exclusive right to purchase the property, subject to the NSR, for US$1,000,000.

    6.(b)  

    Mineral Properties(Continued)

    Blue Ridge Claims

    The Company assumed a mineral lease agreement dated March 1, 1992 relating to nine mineral claims which form part of the core area of the Robertson Property. The original lease agreement bears an initial term of 20 years with the possibility to extend the term if the Company is actively exploring, developing or mining the property. These claims are subject to a 5% NSR. In order to maintain the lease the Company must pay minimum advanced royalty payments of US$1,800 per month during the term of the lease.

    (c)  Chachas/Moore Lease

    The Company assumed an option-to-purchase agreement dated November 30, 1975 related to 13 mineral claims which form part of the core area of the Robertson Property. The total purchase price of the claims is US$2,000,000 which is payable in installments of US$1,000 per month until paid in full.

    The property is subject to an 8% NSR. Any NSR royalty payments paid to the lessors are credited against the minimum monthly payments for a period equal to the value of the royalties paid at a rate of US$1,000 per month.
    79

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    6.             Mineral Properties (Continued)

    a)  

    Robertson Property(Continued)


    (i)  
    (i)

    Carve-outCore Claims – 39% carried100% interest(Continued)


    (d)  

    The Amax 61% interest was subsequently acquired by Cortez GML and is currently owned by Barrick.

    (ii)

    Ruf/Blue Nugget, Lander Ranch & Norma Sass Claims – 66.67% owned


    The Company entered a mineral lease and option-to-purchase agreement with respect to 9 Blue Nugget claims, 27 Lander Ranch claims, 24 Norma claims and 11 Sass claims of which the Blue Nugget and Lander Ranch claims form part of the core area of the Robertson Property and the Norma and Sass claims form part of the Norma Sass Property (Notes 6(a)(iii) and 6(b)). Pursuant to the fifth amending agreement, the term of the lease was extended to April 21, 2013. The total purchase price of the claims is US$1,500,000, which is payable in annual installments of $500 per claim until paid in full.

    (e)  Northern Nevada Lease

    The Company entered a mineral lease with respect to 12 claims, which form part of the core area of the Robertson Property with an indefinite term.

    The claims are subject to a 4% NSR for which the Company is required to make minimum annual advanced royalty payments in the amount of $9,600 per year throughout the term of the lease.

        (ii)      Carve-out Claims – 39% carried interest
    By Agreement dated May 16, 1996, the Company granted Amax an option to purchase a 51% interest in 219 claims. Amax exercised the option by paying twice the amount the Company had incurred in exploration expenditures on the property. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company has a 39% carried interest.

    The Amax 61% interest was subsequently acquired by Cortez GML and is currently owned by Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”).

    (iii)     Ruf Claims – 66.67% owned
    By an amended Option Agreement dated September 13, 1995, the Company granted Levon Resources Ltd. (“Levon”), a company related by common directors, an option to purchase a 50% interest in 58 claims including 23 Ruf, 24 Norma and 11 Sass Claims (Notes 6(a)(i)(d) and 6(b)) of which the Ruf claims form a portion of the Robertson Property and the Norma/Sass claims constitute the Norma/Sass Property. On December 31, 2002, the Agreement was amended whereby Levon earned a 33.33% interest in these claims. Expenditures incurred on the Ruf claims have been classified to Ruf and Norma Sass claims in the mineral property expenditure table.

    A third party holds a 3% NSR royalty from some of these mining claims, up to a limit of US$1,250,000.

    b)  

    By an amended Option Agreement dated September 13, 1995, the Company had granted Levon Resources Ltd. (“Levon”), a company related by common directors, an option to purchase a 50% interest in 54 claims known as the Ruf/Norma Sass Claims (the “Property”). On December 31, 2002, the Agreement was amended whereby Levon earned a 33.33%Property

    The Company holds a 66.67% interest in the claims by issuing of 300,000 common shares of Levon to the Company (previously received) and incurring $350,294 in exploration on the 35 Norma Sass mining claims located in the Bullion Mining District, Lander County, Nevada pursuant to a mineral lease and option-to-purchase agreement (Note 6(a)(i)(d)). The remaining 33.33% interest is held by Levon (Note 6(a)(iii)).
    80

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    6.             Mineral Properties (Continued)

    b)  Norma Sass Property (previously incurred).

    (Continued)

    By way of an agreement dated September 25, 2008, the Company and Levon granted Barrick an option to acquire a 60% interest in these claims by incurring total exploration expenditures of at least US$3,000,000 in annual installments by December 31, 2014 as follows:

    a)  

    A third party holds a 3% net smelter returns royalty on the production from some of these mining claims, up to a limit ofIncur US$1,250,000.

    By way of an agreement dated September 25, 2008, the Company and Levon granted Barrick Gold (“Barrick”) an option to acquire a 60% interest in the claims by incurring total exploration expenditures of at least US$3,000,000 in annual installments by December 31, 2014 as follows:

    a) Incur $250,000250,000 on or before December 31, 2009;

    2009 (completed);

    b)  

    b) Incur $250,000US$250,000 on or before December 31, 2010;


    c)  

    c) Incur $500,000US$500,000 on or before December 31, 2011;


    d)  

    d) Incur $500,000US$500,000 on or before December 31, 2012;


    e)  

    e) Incur $600,000US$600,000 on or before December 31, 2013; and


    f)  

    f) Incur $900,000US$900,000 on or before December 31, 2013.

    (iii)

    Marcus Corporation

    The Company owns 98.49% of the total issued shares of Marcus which holds 39 unpatented lode claims and two Placer claims, which form a portion of the Company’s Robertson Property.

    (iv)

    Fanny Komp/Elwood Wright Lease

    In the fiscal year ending January 31, 2008, the Company purchased 100% interest in the 72 claims comprising the Fanny Komp/Elwood Wright lease which forms part of the core area of the Robertson Property for USD$250,000.

    2014.

    72


    Barrick may earn an additional 10% by incurring an additional US$1,500,000 by December 13, 2015. Barrick may earn an additional 5% by carrying the Company and Levon through to commercial production. Alternatively, at the time of earning either its 60% or 70% interest, Barrick may be given the option to buy-out the Company’s and Levon’s joint interest by paying US$6,000,000 and granting them a 2% NSR royalty.

    Realization of assets

    The investment in and expenditures on mineral property interests comprise a significant portion of the Company’s assets. Realization of the Company’s investment in these assets is dependent upon the establishment of legal ownership, the attainment of successful production from the properties or from the proceeds of their disposal. Resource exploration and development is highly speculative and involves inherent risks. While the rewards if an ore body is discovered can be substantial, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. There can be no assurance that current exploration programs will result in the discovery of economically viable quantities of ore.

    The amounts shown for acquisition costs and deferred exploration expenditures represent costs incurred to date and do not necessarily reflect present or future values.

    Title to mineral property interests

    Although the Company has taken steps to verify the title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title.  Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.
    81

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    6.             Mineral Properties (Continued)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    Environmental
    The Company is subject to the laws and regulations relating to environmental matters in all jurisdictions in which it operates, including provisions relating to property reclamation, discharge of hazardous material and other matters.  The Company may also be held liable should environmental problems be discovered that were caused by former owners and operators of its properties and properties in which it has previously had an interest.  The Company conducts its mineral exploration activities in compliance with applicable environmental protection legislation. The Company is not aware of any existing environmental problems related to any of its current or former properties that may result in material liability to the Company other than as disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.

    6.

    Mineral Properties(Continued)

    Robertson Property(Continued)

    (v)

    June Claims

    During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company has completed a mineral lease with an option-to- purchase agreement to explore, develop, and exploit six lode mining claims located in Lander County, State of Nevada. The agreement is for an initial term of 4 years in consideration of the payment of an annual rent of US$25,000, renewable in successive four-year terms, provided that the rent will increase by US $5,000 every four years. The property is subject to a royalty charge of 3% of NSR, subject to the Company’s exclusive right to purchase the NSR for US$1,000,000 per percentage point upon notice to the Lessors. The Company also has the exclusive right to purchase the property, subject to the NSR, for US$1,000,000 upon notice to the Lessors.

    Realization of assets

    The investment in and expenditures on mineral property interests comprise a significant portion of the Company’s assets. Realization of the Company’s investment in these assets is dependent upon the establishment of legal ownership, the attainment of successful production from the properties or from the proceeds of their disposal. Resource exploration and development is highly speculative and involves inherent risks. While the rewards if an ore body is discovered can be substantial, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. There can be no assurance that current exploration programs will result in the discovery of economically viable quantities of ore.

    The amounts shown for acquisition costs and deferred exploration expenditures represent costs incurred to date and do not necessarily reflect present or future values. These costs will be depleted over the useful lives of the properties upon commencement of commercial production or written off if the properties are abandoned or the claims allowed to lapse.

    Title to mineral property interests

    Although the Company has taken steps to verify the title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.

    Environmental

    The Company is subject to the laws and regulations relating to environmental matters in all jurisdictions in which it operates, including provisions relating to property reclamation, discharge of hazardous material and other matters. The Company may also be held liable should environmental problems be discovered that were caused by former owners and operators of its properties and properties in which it has previously had an interest. The Company conducts its mineral exploration activities in compliance with applicable environmental protection legislation. The Company is not aware of any existing environmental problems related to any of its current or former properties that may result in material liability to the Company.

    Environmental legislation is becoming increasingly stringent and costs and expenses of regulatory compliance are increasing. The impact of new and future environmental legislation on the Company’s operations may cause additional expenses and restrictions. If the restrictions adversely affect the scope of exploration and development on the mineral properties, the potential for production on the property may be diminished or negated.

    73

    Environmental legislation is becoming increasingly stringent and costs and expenses of regulatory compliance are increasing. The impact of new and future environmental legislation on the Company’s operations may cause additional expenses and restrictions. If the restrictions adversely affect the scope of exploration and development on the mineral properties, the potential for production on the property may be diminished or negated.

    7.             Reclamation Deposits
    Under the Bureau of Land Management of the United States (the “Bureau”), the Company is required to hold reclamation deposits that cover the estimated cost to reclaim the ground disturbed. During the year ended January 31, 2010, the Company completed certain reclamation activities in Nevada, thereby as approved by the Bureau the bond was decreased by $8,268 (US$7,905). As at January 31, 2010, the total reclamation deposits were $408,075 (US$382,482) (2009 - $477,550 (US$390,387).

    The Company placed the funds in trust with a fully secured standby letter of credit lodged as collateral in support of the bond. Interest is accrued on the bond at a monthly weighted average rate of 0.10% (2009 – 2.11%).

    8.             Share Capital

    a) Authorized

    Unlimited common shares without par value.

    b) Issued
    During the year ended January 31, 2008, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 4,230,000 units at a price of $1.00 per unit, each unit consisting of one common share and one transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitled the investor to purchase one additional share at an exercise price of $1.17 per share for one year.  The proceeds of the private placement have been bifurcated using on the black-scholes method resulting in $3,369,900 recorded as share capital and $860,100 representing the fair value of the warrants recorded as contributed surplus. The fair value of each warrant has been estimated as of the date of the issuance using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.00%, dividend yield of 0.00%, volatility of 65.77% and an expected life o f 1.00 year.
    During the year ended January 31, 2008, 20,691 warrants and 135,000 options were exercised for total proceeds of $13,794 and $76,100, respectively. The Company reallocated the fair value of warrants and options in the amounts of $4,593 and $40,840, respectively, from contributed surplus to share capital.
    82

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    8.             Share Capital (Continued)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    b) Issued (Continued)

    7.

    Reclamation Deposit

    Under the Bureau of Land Management, the Company is required to have a reclamation deposit which covers the cost to reclaim the ground disturbed. During the year ended January 31, 2009,additional planned exploration activities in Nevada were approved by the Bureau of Land Management (the “Bureau”), thereby the bond was increased by $85,806 (US$69,960). As at January 31, 2009, the total reclamation deposit was $477,550 (US$389,360) (2008 – $320,103 (US$319,400).

    Coral Resources, Inc., as principal, placed the funds in trust with a fully secured standby letter of credit lodged as collateral in support of the bond. Interest is accrued on the bond at a monthly weighted average rate of 2.11%.

    8.

    Share Capital

    a)

    Authorized

    Unlimited common shares without par value.

    b)

    Issued

    During the year ended January 31, 2008, the Company’s share structure was amended by subdividing every one common share into three common shares. If not stated otherwise, for the current period and the comparative periods, those numbers of shares, stock options and share purchase warrants outstanding, as well as net loss per share, have been adjusted to reflect this three-for-one share split.

    During the year ended January 31, 2008, the Company issued a non-brokered private placement of 4,230,000 units at a price of $1.00 per unit (1,410,000 units at a price of $3.00 per unit before the three-to-one share split), each unit consisting of one common share and one transferable share purchase warrant. Each warrant will entitle the investor to purchase one additional share at an exercise price of $1.17 ($3.50 before three-to-one share split) for one year. The proceeds of the private placement have been bifurcated using on the residual fair value method resulting in $3,369,900 recorded as share capital and $860,100 representing the fair value of the warrants recorded as contributed surplus. The fair value of each warrant has been estimated as of the date of the issuance using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.0%, dividend yield of 0.0%, volatility of 65.77% and expected life of one year.

    c)

    Share Purchase Warrants

    A summary of share purchase warrants transactions for the year ended January 31, 2009 is as follows:

    During the year ended January 31, 2009, 107,000 stock options were exercised for total proceeds of $59,920. The Company reallocated the fair value of these options previously recorded in the amount of $30,019 from contributed surplus to share capital.

       Number of  Weighted Average 
       Shares  Exercise Price 
            
     Balance outstanding, January 31, 2007 313,152 $0.67 
        Issued 4,230,000 $1.17 
        Exercised (20,691)$0.67 
        Expired (292,461)$0.67 
     Balance outstanding , January 31, 2008      
        and January 31, 2009 4,230,000 $1.17 

    74

    During the year ended January 31, 2010, 523,500 stock options were exercised for total proceeds of $293,160. The Company reallocated the fair value of these options previously recorded in the amount of $147,320 from contributed surplus to share capital.
    c) Share Purchase Warrants

    During the years ended January 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no warrants issued or exercised.

    During the year end January 31, 2009, the expiry date of the warrants issued pursuant to a private placement announced on April 20, 2007 were extended from May 18, 2008 to May 18, 2009.  The aggregate fair value compensation cost of these warrant amendments in the amount of $1,513,500 has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for the fair value of the original warrants at the date of amendment and the fair value of the amended warrants at the date of the amendment respectively: risk-free interest rates of 2.66% and 2.66%, dividend yield of 0.00% and 0.00%, volatility of 71.39% and 127.29% and an expected life of 0.27 years and 1.27 years.

    On April 21, 2009, the TSX Venture Exchange granted approval to further extend these warrants to May 18, 2010. As a result of these warrant amendments, the Company recorded an additional aggregate fair value compensation cost in the amount of $703,897 (Note 8(e)), which has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for the fair value of the original warrants at the date of amendment and the fair value of the amended warrants at the date of the amendment respectively: risk-free interest rates of 0.80% and 0.80%, dividend yield of 0.00% and 0.00%, volatility of 122.86% and 139.51% and an expected life of 0.08 years and 1.00 year.

    As at January 31, 2010 and 2009, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:

    Number of Underlying Shares Exercise Price Expiry Date
         
    4,230,000 $1.17           May 18, 2010*

    * As at January 31, 2009, these warrants expired on May 18, 2009. Subsequent to January 31, 2010, these warrants expired unexercised (Note 15(d)).
    83

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    8.             Share Capital (Continued)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    d) Stock Options

    8.

    Share Capital(Continued)

    c)

    Share Purchase Warrants(Continued)

    During the year end January 31, 2009, the expiry date of the warrants issued pursuant to a private placement announced on April 20, 2007 were extended from May 18, 2008 to May 18, 2009. The aggregate fair value compensation cost of these warrant amendments in the amount of $1,513,000 has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for the fair value of the original warrants at the date of amendment and the fair value of the amended warrants at the date of the amendment respectively: risk-free interest rates of 2.66% and 2.66%, dividend yield of nil and nil, volatility of 71.39% and 127.29% and an expected life of 0.27 years and 1.27 years. Subsequent to January 31, 2009, the TSX Venture Exchange granted approval to extend these warrants to May 18, 2010 (Note 17).

    As at January 31, 2009 and 2008, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding:


     Number of underlying SharesExercise PriceExpiry Date
     4,230,000$1.17May 18, 2009

    d)Stock Options

    The Company has granted founders, directors, officers, consultants and certain employees stock options. For the year ended January 31, 20092010 and 2008,2009, stock option activity is summarized as follows:

       Number  Weighted Average 
       of Options  Exercise Price 
     Balance,January 31, 2007 2,365,500 $0.99 
        Granted 735,000 $1.00 
        Exercised (135,000)$0.56 
        Cancelled (112,500)$0.96 
        Expired (30,000)$1.29 
            
     Balance,January 31, 2008 2,823,000 $1.00 
        Granted 634,000 $1.09 
        Exercised (107,000)$0.56 
        Cancelled (629,000)$1.11 
            
     Balance,January 31, 2009 2,721,000 $1.02 

    75



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
      
    Number
    of Options
      Weighted Average Exercise Price 
    Balance, January 31, 2008
      2,823,000  $1.00 
       Granted  634,000  $1.09 
       Exercised  (107,000) $0.56 
       Cancelled  (629,000) $1.11 
             
    Balance, January 31, 2009
      2,721,000  $1.02 
       Granted  620,000  $0.76 
       Exercised  (523,500) $0.56 
       Cancelled  (235,000) $1.09 
       Expired  (60,000) $0.56 
             
    Balance, January 31, 2010
      2,522,500  $1.05 

    8.

    Share Capital(Continued)

    d)Stock Options(Continued)

    A summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as at January 31, 2009 is as follows:


      Weighted  
      Average  
      Remaining  
    NumberExerciseContractualIntrinsic 
    OutstandingPriceLife (yrs)ValueExpiry Date
    559,500$0.560.83           $0.00December 1, 2009
    30,000$0.561.19           $0.00April 12, 2010
    631,500$1.171.86           $0.00December 12, 2010
    690,000$1.292.59           $0.00September 5, 2011
    675,000$1.003.65           $0.00September 26, 2012
    100,000$1.004.04           $0.00February 4, 2013
    35,000$1.004.25           $0.00May 1, 2013
         
    2,721,000    

    A summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as at January 31, 20082010 is as follows:

      Weighted  
      Average  
      Remaining  
    NumberExerciseContractualIntrinsic 
    OutstandingPriceLife (yrs)ValueExpiry Date
    661,500$0.561.84           $0.23December 1, 2009
    45,000$0.562.20           $0.23April 12, 2010
    631,500$1.172.87           $0.00December 12, 2010
    750,000$1.293.60           $0.00September 5, 2011
    735,000$1.004.62           $0.00September 26, 2012
         
    2,823,000    

    Number
    Outstanding
      
    Exercise
    Price
      
    Weighted Average
    Remaining
    Contractual
    Life (yrs)
      Intrinsic Value Expiry Date
     622,500  $1.17   0.86  $0.00 December 12, 2010
     615,000  $1.29   1.59  $0.00 September 5, 2011
     35,000  $0.76   1.95  $0.00 January 13, 2012
     550,000  $1.00   2.65  $0.00 September 26, 2012
     100,000  $1.00   3.01  $0.00 February 4, 2013
     15,000  $1.00   3.25  $0.00 May 1, 2013
     585,000  $0.76   4.95  $0.00 January 13, 2015
                  
     2,522,500            

    84

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    8.             Share Capital (Continued)

    d) Stock Options (Continued)

     A summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as at January 31, 2009 is as follows:

    Number
    Outstanding
      
    Exercise
    Price
      
    Weighted Average
    Remaining
    Contractual
    Life (yrs)
      
    Intrinsic
    Value
     Expiry Date
     559,500  $0.56   0.83  $0.00 December 1, 2009
     30,000  $0.56   1.19  $0.00 April 12, 2010
     631,500  $1.17   1.86  $0.00 December 12, 2010
     690,000  $1.29   2.59  $0.00 September 5, 2011
     675,000  $1.00   3.65  $0.00 September 26, 2012
     100,000  $1.00   4.04  $0.00 February 4, 2013
     35,000  $1.00   4.25  $0.00 May 1, 2013
                  
     2,721,000            

    The Company’s stock option plan provides for the granting of options to directors, officers, employees and consultants.  Under the terms of the option plan, options issued will not exceed 10% (2009 – 20%) of the issued and outstanding shares from time to time.  The option price under each option is not less than the discounted market price on the grant date.  The expiry date for each option is set by the Board of Directors at the time of issue and cannot be more than fiveten years after the grant date.

    76


    All options vest 100% on the grant date unless a vesting schedule is set by the Board of Directors at the time of issue.

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)e) Stock-Based Compensation

    Stock-based compensation expense is determined using the fair value method. The Company estimated this expense using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

      2010  2009  2008 
              
    Risk-free interest rate  2.39%  3.36%  4.50%
    Expected dividend yield  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%
    Expected stock price volatility  115.98%  113.72%  92.63%
    Expected option life in years  4.83   5.00   5.00 
    Fair value $0.54  $0.40  $0.42 
    85

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    8.

    Share Capital(Continued)


     

    e) Stock-Based Compensation

    Stock-based compensation expense is determined using the fair value method. The Company estimated this expense using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

    (Continued)

       2009  2008 
            
     Weighted average risk-free interest rate 3.36%  4.50% 
     Expected dividend yield 0  0 
     Weighted average expected stock price volatility 113.72%  92.63% 
     Expected option life in years 5  5 

    During the year ended January 31, 2009,2010, the Company granted stock options to various employees, consultants and investor relations consultants to purchase up to 634,000 (2008 – 735,000; 2007620,000 (2009 - $840,000)634,000; 2008 - 735,000) common shares at exercise prices of $0.76 per share (2009 - $1.00 and $1.11$1.11; 2008 - $1.17) pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan. Of this amount, 499,000nil (2009 - 499,000; 2008 - nil) stock options were cancelled prior to vesting due to the termination of an investor relations agreement. The Company recordedexpensed stock-based compensation expense of $255,763 (2008 – $310,246; 2007 – $748,409).$334,392 (2009 - $255,763; 2008 - $310,246) for stock options granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants and capitalized $5,545 (2009 - $nil; 2008 - $nil) to mineral properties to reflect the stock options granted to a consultant providing geological services. The amounts expensede xpensed were allocated to directors/officers, employees and consultants as follows:

       2009  2008  2007 
               
     Directors, officers and employees$ 24,902 $261,998 $697,856 
     Investor relations 35,791  33,191  22,639 
     Consultants 195,070  15,057  27,914 
     Modification of warrants (Note 8(c)) 1,513,500  -  - 
      $ 1,769,263       
         $310,246 $748,409 


      2010  2009  2008 
              
    Directors, officers and employees $282,772  $24,902  $261,998 
    Investor relations  -   35,791   33,191 
    Consultants  51,620   195,070   15,057 
    Modification of warrants (Note 8(c))  703,897   1,513,500   - 
      $1,038,289  $1,769,263  $310,246 

    f) Earnings (Loss) per Share

    The following sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

      2010  2009  2008 
              
    Net income (loss) for the year $1,711,611  $(3,746,165) $(1,319,185)
    Weighted average number of common shares  25,093,778   24,979,312   23,570,728 
    Effect of dilutive securities            
    Warrants (Note 8(c))  -   -   - 
    Options (Note (8(d))  -   -   - 
       25,093,778   24,979,312   23,570,728 
    Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.07  $(0.15) $(0.06)

    All the warrants (Note 8(c)) and options (Note 8(d)) are potentially dilutive in the year ended January 31, 2010, but were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the average market prices exceed the exercise prices. For the years ended January 31, 2009 and 2008, warrants (Note 8(c)) and options (Note 8(d)), which are potentially dilutive, are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their impact would be anti-dilutive.
    86

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    9.             Related Party Transactions

    During the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense on warrants amended of $1,513,500 (2008 - $nil).

    Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective estimates and assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Changes in the underlying assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

    77


    2010:

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)(a)  
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009,$30,000 (2009 - $30,000; 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    9.

    Related Party Transactions

    During the year ended January 31, 2009:

    (a)

    $30,000 (2008 – $30,000; 2007 –- $30,000) was paid for consulting fees to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company;


    (b)  
    (b)

    $75,000 (2008 –(2009 - $75,000; 2007 – $31,250)2008 - $75,000) was paid for management fees to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company;


    (c)  
    (c)

    $30,000 (2008 –20,250 (2009 - $30,000; 2007 –2008 - $65,000) was paid for management fees to a private company controlled by an officer of the Company;


    (d)  
    (d)

    $30,000 (2008 – $nil ; 2007 –20,250 (2009 - $30,000; 2008 - $nil) was paid for consulting fees to a private company controlled by an officer of a related Company;


    (e)  
    (e)

    $186,734 (2008 – $168,983; 2007 – $116,135)147,711 (2009 - $186,734; 2008 - $168,983) was charged for office occupancy and miscellaneous, costssalaries and salaries,benefits, and administrative services paid on behalf of the Company by Oniva International Services Corp. (“Oniva”), a private company owned by the Company and five other reporting issuers having common directors;


    (f)  
    (f)

    $39,526 (2008 – $15,332; 2007 – $nil)nil (2009 - $39,526; 2008 - $15,332) was paid for geological consulting services to a private company controlled by a former director of the Company;


    (g)  
    (g)

    $35,888 (2008 – $42,661; 2007 – $47,198)24,690 (2009 - $35,888; 2008 - $42,661) was paid for geological consulting services to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company;


    (h)  
    (h)

    $12,000 (2008 –18,000 (2009 - $12,000; 2007 – $62,000)2008 - $12,000) was paidcharged for directors’ fees to the Directors’ of the Company;

    and

    (i)  

    These charges were measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount agreed upon by the transacting parties.

    The Company entered into a cost-sharing agreement during 2005 to reimburse Oniva International Services Corp. for a variable percentage of its overhead expenses, to reimburse 100% of its out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of the Company, and to pay a percentage fee based on the total overhead and corporate expenses referred to above. The agreement may be terminated with one month’s notice by either party.

    Advances receivable from related parties comprises US$52,891 (2008 – US$52,891) less an allowance for bad debt of US$39,113 (2008 – US$39,113). The$17,000 (2009 - $nil; 2008 - $nil) in advances receivable from related parties is from a public company related by common directors. Amounts due are without stated terms of interest or repayment.

    Advances payable to related parties include $12,288 (2008 – $16,662) duerelating to Oniva, $17,000 (2008 – $17,000) due to a director ofdirectors’ fees outstanding since 2003 was reversed during the Company, and $40,796 (2008 – $2,570) due to two private companies controlled by directors and officers of the Company. Amounts due are without stated terms of interest or repayment.

    year.

    78

    These charges were measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount agreed upon by the transacting parties.

    The Company entered into a cost-sharing agreement during 2005 to reimburse Oniva for a variable percentage of its overhead expenses, to reimburse 100% of its out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of the Company, and to pay a percentage fee based on the total overhead and corporate expenses referred to above. The agreement may be terminated with one month’s notice by either party.

    Advances receivable from related party comprises US$56,277 (2009 - US$52,891) less an allowance for non collection of US$39,113 (2009 - US$39,113).  The advances receivable from related party is from a public company related by common directors.  Amounts due are without stated terms of interest or repayment.

    Advances payable to related parties include $14,949 (2009 - $12,288) due to Oniva, $6,000 (2009 - $17,000) due to directors of the Company, $2,073 (2009 - $1,526) due to a private company controlled by a director and officer of the Company and $nil (2009 - $39,270) due to a private company controlled by a former director of the company. Amounts due are without stated terms of interest or repayment.
    87

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    10.          Asset Retirement Obligation

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)
    The Company’s ARO relates to the reclamation work required by the Bureau to be performed on the Robertson Property. Management has assessed the AROs and the associated liability to be recognized in the current period. During the year ended January 31, 2010, the Company reclassified its ARO from current liabilities to long-term liabilities due to changes in the estimated timing of cash flows. In the prior year, the Company intended to fulfill its obligation in fiscal 2010; however, as the result of planned exploration on the Robertson Property for fiscal 2011, the Company deferred the reclamation work.

    10.

    Asset Retirement Obligation

    Management has assessed their AROs and the associated liability to be recognized in the current period. Management has estimated that the costs would approximate $270,979 (2008 – $194,361). The Company intends on fulfilling its obligation in fiscal 2010; therefore there is no difference between the present value and undiscounted value of the obligation. The increase of $76,618 in the obligation over fiscal 2008 was the result of a reassessment of new and previously existing reclamation concerns. Management will continue to assess their asset retirement obligations and the associated liability as further information becomes known.

    11.

    Capital Management

    The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration of its properties and to maintain flexible capital structure for its projects for the benefit of its stakeholders. In the management of capital, the Company includes the components of shareholders’ equity as well as cash and cash equivalents, receivables and current liabilities.

    The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new shares or adjust the amount of cash and cash equivalents. Management reviews the capital structure on a regular basis to ensure that objectives are met.

    12.

    Supplementary Cash Flow Information

    Management estimates the total undiscounted inflation-adjusted amount of cash flows required to settle its ARO to be approximately US$249,000 (2008 - US$221,000), which is expected to be incurred during 2017 and 2018. The risk-free rate of 2.33% was used to calculate the present value of the ARO. In the prior year, the Company intended to fulfill its obligation in fiscal 2010; therefore, there was no difference between the present value and undiscounted inflation-adjusted value of the obligation. Management will continue to assess the AROs and the associated liability as further information becomes known.

       For the          
       period from          
       inception on          
       January 22,          
       1981 to          
     Net changes in non-cash January 31,          
     working capital 2009  2009  2008  2007 
                  
     Advances receivable$ (431,342)$ (3,091)$ 36,634 $ 11,916 
     Prepaid expenses (5,854) (2,691) 52,477  14,216 
     Interest and other amounts            
        receivable (9,747) 45,868  (24,611) (97,124)
     Accounts payable and accrued            
        liabilities 64,334  (57,034) (331,071) (244,371)
     Advances payable to related            
        parties 29,287  (7,211) 18,527  (43,984)
     Asset retirement obligation (13,202) 0  (12,816) (386)
                  
     Cash used in operating            
        activities$ (366,524)$ (24,160)$ (260,860)$ (359,733)

    79



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    13.

    Income Taxes

    The

    A reconciliation of the ARO is as follows:

      2010  2009 
    Beginning balance $270,979  $194,361 
    Additions  -   33,120 
    Revision due to estimated timing of cash flows  (12,474)  - 
    Change in foreign exchange rate  (22,257)  43,498 
             
    Ending balance $236,248  $270,979 

    11.           Capital Management

    The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to pursue the exploration of its properties and to maintain flexible capital structure for its projects for the benefit of its stakeholders. In the management of capital, the Company includes the components of shareholders’ equity.

    The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may attempt to issue new shares or reduce expenditures. Management reviews the capital structure on a regular basis to ensure that objectives are met.

    There have been no changes to the Company’s approach to capital management during the year.
    88


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    12.           Net Change in Non-Cash Working Capital

      2010  2009  2008 
              
    Advances receivable from related party $(1,455) $(3,091) $36,634 
    Prepaid expenses  1,160   (2,691)  52,477 
    Interest and other amounts receivable  (3,870)  45,868   (24,611)
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  1,160   (57,034)  (331,071)
    Advances payable to related parties  8,662   (7,212)  18,527 
    Asset retirement obligation  -   -   (12,816)
                 
      $5,657  $(24,160) $(260,860)

    13.           Income Taxes

    Income tax recovery differs from the amount that would result from applying the Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rates to loss before future income tax recovery (expense) rate totaxes. For the year ended January 31, 2010, the Canadian statutory rate is as follows:

       2009  2008  2007 
     Income tax recovery at         
        the statutory rate$ 1,012,053 $ 236,783 $ 699,236 
     Tax effect of expenses that are         
        not deductible         
          Mineral properties 488,956  581,628  486,121 
          Foreign exchange (282,097) 190,212  (29,169)
          Stock-based compensation (557,318) (100,069) (255,357)
     Changes in valuation allowance (1,299,262) (1,950,640) (1,710,140)
     Adjustment due to effective rate         
        attributable to income taxes in         
        other countries 55,774  15,376  12,829 
     Changes in income tax rates and         
        foreign exchange 48,597  406,000  317,210 
               
     Net future income tax expense$ (533,297)$ (620,710)$ (479,270)

    29.88% (2009 – 31.50%; 2008 – 33.90%) .


      2010  2009  2008 
    Income tax recovery at the statutory rate $337,418  $1,012,053  $236,783 
    Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible            
    Mineral properties  213,086   488,956   581,628 
    Foreign exchange  135,091   (282,097)  190,212 
    Stock-based compensation  (310,189)  (557,318)  (100,069)
    Changes in valuation allowance  2,506,427   (1,299,262)  (1,950,640)
    Adjustment due to effective rate attributable to income taxes in other countries  1,967   55,774   15,376 
    Changes in income tax rates and foreign exchange  (42,945)  48,597   406,000 
    Net future income tax expense $2,840,855  $(533,297) $(620,710)
    89

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    13.           Income Taxes (Continued)

    The components of the future income tax assets (liabilities), after applying enacted Canadian rates of 25.00% (2009 – 26.00%) and enacted US rates of 34.00% (2009 – 35.00%) are as follows:

       2009  2008 
          (Note 16)
     Future income tax assets      
      Non-capital loss carry-forwards$ 4,766,000 $3,584,000 
      Other 18,000  6,000 
       4,784,000  3,590,000 
      Less: valuation allowance (4,784,000) (3,590,000)
     Net future income tax asset -  - 
     Future income tax liability      
      Mineral property interests (4,963,038) (3,562,808)
     Net future income tax liability$(4,963,038)$(3,562,808)


      2010  2009 
           
    Future income tax assets      
      Non-capital loss carry-forwards $4,403,000  $4,766,000 
    Investment securities  -   9,000 
      Other  5,000   9,000 
       4,408,000   4,784,000 
      Less: valuation allowance  (1,636,687)  (4,784,000)
    Net future income tax asset  2,771,313   - 
    Future income tax liability        
    Investment securities  (59,000)  - 
      Mineral property interests  (4,399,676)  (4,963,038)
    Net future income tax liability $(1,687,363) $(4,963,038)

    The valuation allowance reflects the Company’s estimate that a portion of the future tax assets, more likely than not, will not be realized.


    At January 31, 2009,2010, the Company had, for Canadian tax purposes, non-capital losses aggregating approximately $5,538,000.$5,581,000. These losses are available to reduce taxable income earned by the Canadian operations of future years and expire as follows:

     2010$ 527,000 
     2011 627,000 
     2015 522,000 
     2026 1,231,000 
     2027 1,114,000 
     2028 900,000 
     2029 617,000 
      $5,538,000 

    80


    2011  $627,000  
    2015  522,000 
    2026  1,231,000 
    2027  1,114,000 
    2028  900,000 
    2029  623,000 
    2030  564,000 
      $5,581,000 
    90

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    13.           Income Taxes (Continued)

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    13.Income Taxes(Continued)

    At January 31, 2009,2010, the Company had, for US tax purposes, non-capitalnet operating losses aggregating approximately $5,538,000.US$8,322,000. The net operating losses are available to offset future revenues oftaxable income earned by the US operations are approximately US$7,713,000of future years and expire as follows:

     2010$ 118,000 
     2011 81,000 
     2012 130,000 
     2013 58,000 
     2014 364,000 
     2015 99,000 
     2016 220,000 
     2017 167,000 
     2018 596,000 
     2019 335,000 
     2020 627,000 
     2021 513,000 
     2022 1,284,000 
     2023 1,648,000 
     2024 1,473,000 
      $ 7,713,000 

    2014  $118,000  
    2015  81,000 
    2016  130,000 
    2017  58,000 
    2018  364,000 
    2020  99,000 
    2021  219,000 
    2022  166,000 
    2023  596,000 
    2024  335,000 
    2025  627,000 
    2026  513,000 
    2027  1,284,000 
    2028  1,648,000 
    2029  1,498,000 
    2030  586,000 
      $8,322,000 

    14.Segmented Information


    The Company is involved in one operating segment, mineral exploration and development activities principally in the United States.activities. The Company is in the exploration stage and, accordingly, has no reportable segment revenues for each of the 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 fiscal years. All operating losses for 2010, 2009 2008 and 20072008 are as a result of Canadian head office costs. Costs of US operations are capitalized to mineral properties. The assets of the Company are geographically segmented as follows:

     January 31, 2009 Canada  US  Total 
     Current assets$ 1,331,702 $ 33,114 $ 1,364,816 
     Investment securities 78,803  -  78,803 
     Equipment 1,862  5,682  7,544 
     Mineral properties -  15,704,913  15,704,913 
     Reclamation deposit -  477,550  477,550 
      $ 1,412,367 $ 16,221,259 $ 17,633,626 

     January 31, 2008 Canada  US  Total 
     Current assets$ 3,642,859 $ 31,816 $ 3,674,675 
     Investment securities 167,282  -  167,282 
     Equipment 2,327  -  2,327 
     Mineral properties -  14,021,301  14,021,301 
     Reclamation deposit -  320,103  320,103 
      $ 3,812,468 $ 14,373,220 $ 18,185,688 

    81

    January 31, 2010 Canada  US  Total 
    Current assets $709,641  $27,796  $737,437 
    Investment securities  610,967   -   610,967 
    Equipment  1,490   4,383   5,873 
    Mineral properties  -   16,029,214   16,029,214 
    Reclamation deposits  -   408,075   408,075 
      $1,322,098  $16,469,468  $17,791,566 

    January 31, 2009 Canada  US  Total 
    Current assets $1,331,702  $33,114  $1,364,816 
    Investment securities  78,803   -   78,803 
    Equipment  1,862   5,682   7,544 
    Mineral properties  -   15,704,913   15,704,913 
    Reclamation deposits  -   477,550   477,550 
      $1,412,367  $16,221,259  $17,633,626 

    91

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    15.           Subsequent Events

    Subsequent to January 31, 2010:

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)a)  
    NotesThe Company closed the first tranche of a non-brokered private placement for gross proceeds of $2,884,816 from the issuance of 5,245,120 units at a price of $0.55 per unit. Each unit is comprised of one common share and one non-transferrable share purchase warrant.  Each warrant entitles the holder to Consolidated Financial Statements
    Forpurchase one additional common share at a price of $0.75 for a term of two years until April 1, 2012. The Company paid total finders’ fees of $239,517 and issued 415,427 finders’ warrants to individuals and brokers assisting in the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    15.

    Commitment

    In February 2008,financing. Each finders’ warrant entitles the Company entered into an agreement with an individualfinder to provide investor relations services. In considerationpurchase one common share at a price of the services rendered, the Company will pay $1,500 per month$0.75 for a term of one year unless terminated upon 30 day’s notice by either party.

    until April 1, 2011.

    b)  The Company closed the second and final tranche of a non-brokered private placement for gross proceeds of $965,250 from the issuance of 1,755,000 units at a price of $0.55 per unit. Each unit is comprised of one common share and one non-transferrable share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share at a price of $0.75 per share for a term of two years until April 23, 2012. The Company paid total finders’ fees of $28,325 and issued 19,000 finders’ warrants to individuals and brokers assisting in the financing.  Each finders’ warrant entitles the finder to purchase one common share at a price of $0.75 for a term of one year until April 23, 2011.

    c)  The Company entered an agreement dated April 1, 2010 for consulting services for a term of one year for $18,150 plus GST/HST payable in advance. The Company also granted the consultant 33,000 options exercisable for one common share at a price of $0.75 for a term of one year until April 1, 2011.

    d)  On May 18, 2010, 4,230 000 warrants expired unexercised.

    16.

    Comparative Figures

    Certain of the comparative figures for 2008 have been reclassified, where applicable, to conform to the presentation adopted for the current year.

    17.

    Subsequent Event

    On April 21, 2009, the Company amended the terms of 4,230,000 warrants issued pursuant to a private placement announced on April 20, 2007. A first amendment extended the expiry date of the warrants from May 18, 2008 to May 18, 2009 (Note 8(c)). The current amendment will extend the expiry date of the warrants from May 18, 2009 to May 18, 2010. All other terms remain the same.

    18.

    Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

    The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”), which in most respects conform to accounting principals generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). There are certain material differences between Canadian and US GAAP.

    The impact of these differences would be as follows:

    a)

    Reconciliation of Consolidated Balance Sheet Items

    (i)

    Reconciliation of Total Assets and Liabilities

    GAAP

       2009  2008 
     Consolidated balance sheets      
     Total assets, Canadian GAAP$ 17,633,626 $ 18,185,688 
     Capitalized mineral expenditures (14,393,768) (12,710,156)
     Total assets, US GAAP$ 3,239,858 $ 5,475,532 
            
     Total liabilities, Canadian GAAP$ 5,378,755 $ 3,915,356 
     Future income tax liability (4,610,376) (3,210,146)
     Total liabilities, US GAAP$ 768,379 $ 715,210 

    The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which in most respects conform to US GAAP. There are certain material differences between Canadian and US GAAP.

    Mineral Properties


    The Company follows the policy of deferring all acquisition and exploration costs relating to the mineral properties held.  Under US GAAP, the deferred exploration expenditures would have been expensesexpensed in the year they were incurred (see Note 6) and, accordingly, there would be no differences giving rise to the related future income tax relatingliability and the corresponding foreign exchange gain (loss) on the future income tax liability would not be recorded.

    Non-Controlling Interest

    The Company has not yet adopted Section 1602, “Non-Controlling Interests”, for Canadian financial reporting purposes; as such, non-controlling interests for Canadian financial reporting purposes is not disclosed as a component of equity. Under US GAAP, a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and, accordingly, the non-controlling interest as reported in the balance sheet would be reclassified to this difference.

    82

    shareholders’ equity under US GAAP.
    92


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    18.16.

    Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

    GAAP (Continued)

    a)

    Reconciliation of Consolidated Balance Sheet Items(Continued)

    (ii)

    Reconciliation of Deficit


       2009  2008 
     Consolidated statements of equity      
     Deficit end of year, Canadian GAAP$ (32,967,732)$ (29,221,567)
     Stock-based compensation expense (60,000) (60,000)
     Deferred exploration expenditures, net (14,393,768) (12,710,156)
     Future income taxes 4,610,376  3,210,146 
            
     Deficit end of year, US GAAP$ (42,811,124)$ (38,781,577)

    Stock-based compensation expense

    Stock-Based Compensation Expense

    Canadian GAAP and US GAAP both have the same policy of recording compensation expense for the estimated fair value of stock options granted except in accordance with US GAAP, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 (formerly FAS 123R123R) (“ASC 718”) requires the Company to estimate expected forfeituresforfeiture rates at the grant date.  The Company adopted the policy of fair value accounting for stock options under US GAAP, FAS 123,ASC 718, a year earlier than it adopted the policy for Canadian GAAP, and during the one year difference in policy treatment, the Company did not record a stock-based compensation charge of $60,000 under Canadian GAAP.  Therefore, there is a permanent adjustment of $60,000 to deficit when reconciling Canadian GAAP to US GAAP.

    FAS 123R


    ASC 718 was adopted as ateffective February 1, 2007, under the modified prospective method of adoption.  Forfeitures are estimated under FAS 123RASC 718 for options that are not fully vested upon granting.  Therefore, the adoption of this standard has no effect on the consolidated financial statements.


    For US GAAP purposes, stock-based compensation would be included as part of the directors’ fees and a portion would be allocated to salaries and benefits in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

    83


    Derivatives

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting standards related to disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities, which revises the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new standard is effective for the Company on February 1, 2009. This standard had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.

    Cumulative Development Stage Reporting

    The Company is not required and has opted to not report such information for Canadian reporting and for US GAAP purposes; the Company is considered an exploration stage company. US GAAP requires the disclosure of cumulative-to-date information for each line item on the statements of operations and cash flows plus annual summaries of each component of shareholders’ equity since inception. Under Canadian GAAP, reporting of this information is not required. Had the consolidated financial statements been prepared in accordance with US GAAP, such information would have been disclosed.
    93


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    18.16.

    Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

    GAAP (Continued)

    a)  

    (Continued)

    b) Reconciliation of Consolidated Statement of OperationsBalance Sheet Items

    The impact of these differences would be as follows:
    (i)  Reconciliation of total assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest
      2010  2009 
    Consolidated balance sheets      
    Total assets, Canadian GAAP $17,791,566  $17,633,626 
    Capitalized mineral property expenditures  (14,718,069)  (14,393,768)
    Total assets, US GAAP $3,073,497  $3,239,858 
             
    Total liabilities,  Canadian GAAP $2,012,127  $5,368,435 
    Future income tax liability  (1,370,640)  (4,610,376)
    Total liabilities, US GAAP $641,487  $758,059 
             
    Non-controlling interest, Canadian GAAP $10,320  $10,320 
    Reclassification of non-controlling interest to shareholders’ equity  (10,320)  (10,320)
    Total non-controlling interest, US GAAP $-  $- 

       2009  2008  2007 
     Consolidated statements of         
        operations         
     Loss for year, Canadian GAAP$(3,746,165)$(1,319,185)$(2,528,614)
               
     Deferred exploration expenditures (1,683,613) (2,006,961) (1,646,060)
     Future income taxes 533,297  620,710  479,270 
     Foreign exchange gain (loss) 866,933  (553,133) 89,877 
     Net loss for the year, US GAAP (4,029,548) (3,258,569) (3,605,527)
     Unrealized gain (loss) on         
        investments -  -  76,693 
     Net comprehensive loss, US GAAP$(4,029,548)$(3,258,569)$(3,528,834)
     Loss per share, US GAAP –         
          Basic and diluted$(0.16)$(0.14)$(0.18)

    Investment securities

    US GAAP requires investments available for sale

    (ii)           Reconciliation of shareholders’ equity
    94

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to be recorded at fair value. The periodic fluctuation in value is recorded as part of comprehensive income (loss); under US GAAP such fluctuations are not recognized into operation untilConsolidated Financial Statements
    For the investments are sold. Effective for fiscalyears ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


      2010  2009 
    Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity      
           
    Share capital, Canadian and US GAAP $40,742,124  $40,301,644 
             
    Contributed surplus, Canadian GAAP  5,857,421   4,960,907 
    Stock-based compensation expense  60,000   60,000 
             
    Contributed surplus, US GAAP  5,917,421   5,020,907 
             
    Accumulated other comprehensive income, Canadian and US GAAP  425,695   (39,948)
             
    Non-controlling interest, Canadian GAAP  -   - 
    Reclassification of non-controlling interest to shareholders’ equity  10,320   10,320 
             
    Non-controlling interest, US GAAP  10,320   10,320 
             
    Deficit, end of year, Canadian GAAP  (31,256,121)  (32,967,732)
    Stock-based compensation expense  (60,000)  (60,000)
    Deferred exploration expenditures, net  (14,718,069)  (14,393,768)
    Future income taxes  1,370,640   4,610,376 
    Deficit, end of year, US GAAP  (44,663,550)  (42,811,124)
    Total shareholders’ equity, US GAAP $2,432,010  $2,481,799 
    95

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the Canadian GAAP treatment is the same, however in fiscalyears ended January 31, 2007 such investments were recorded in accordance with2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian GAAP at the lower of cost and market; long-term investments in marketable securities are written down to market when impairment is considered other than temporary, in which case the written-down value becomes the new cost base, and the impairment is charged to operations.

    84

    Dollars)



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)

    18.16.

    Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

    GAAP (Continued)

    c) Reconciliation of Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

    b) Reconciliation of Consolidated Statement of Operations Items

       2009  2008  2007 
     Consolidated statements of cash         
     flows         
     Cash used in operating activities         
      per Canadian GAAP$ (557,733)$ (1,201,641)$ (1,475,288)
     Mineral properties expenditures (1,609,696) (1,815,398) (1,646,060)
     Cash flows used in operating activities         
      per US GAAP$ (2,167,429)$ (2,660,570)$ (3,121,348)
               
     Cash used in investing activities under         
      Canadian GAAP$ (1,774,063)$ (2,061,875)$ (1,648,381)
     Mineral properties expenditures 1,609,696  1,815,398  1,646,060 
               
     Cash used in investing activities         
      under US GAAP$ (164,367)$ (246,477)$ (2,321)

      2010  2009  2008 
    Consolidated statements of operations         
    Income (loss) for year, Canadian GAAP $1,711,611  $(3,746,165) $(1,319,185)
    Deferred exploration expenditures  (324,301)  (1,683,613)  (2,006,961)
    Future income taxes  (2,774,334)  533,297   620,710 
    Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (465,402)  866,933   (553,133)
    Net loss for the year, US GAAP  (1,852,426)  (4,029,548)  (3,258,569)
    Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, Canadian and US GAAP  465,643   (88,479)  (19,352)
    Net comprehensive loss, US GAAP $(1,386,783) $(4,118,027) $(3,277,921)
    Loss per share, US GAAP –   Basic and diluted $(0.06) $(0.16) $(0.14)

    c) Reconciliation of Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

      2010  2009  2008 
    Consolidated statements of cash flows         
    Cash used in operating activities per Canadian GAAP $(574,119) $(557,733) $(1,201,641)
    Mineral properties expenditures  (357,480)  (1,609,696)  (1,815,398)
    Cash flows used in operating activities per US GAAP $(931,599) $(2,167,429) $(3,017,039)
                 
    Cash used in investing activities under Canadian GAAP $(349,212) $(1,774,063) $(2,061,875)
    Mineral properties expenditures  357,480   1,609,696   1,815,398 
    Cash provided by (used in) investing activities under US GAAP $8,268  $(164,367) $(246,477)

    d) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards


    (i)  (i)

    In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance, which is now part of ASC 105-10 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, (“SFAS 168”)). SFAS 168 replaces FASB Statement No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles", and establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The provisionsCodification only had the effect of this standard areamending US GAAP references to provideauthoritative accounting guidance in the Company’s consolidated f inancial statements.

    96

    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    16.
    Differences between Canadian and United States GAAP (Continued)

    d) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards (Continued)

    (ii)  
    In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance which is now part of ASC 810-10, “Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (formerly SFAS 160, “Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51”). This guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for usingownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, changes in a parent’s ownership of a non-controlling interest, calculation and disclosure of the consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest and fair value measurement of an y retained non-controlling equity investment. This standard had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    (iii)  
    In December 2007, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”) (formerly SFAS 141R), which established principles and requirements for the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets (including in-process research and liabilities.development and defensive assets) acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The standard clarifies methods for measuring items not actively traded and the principles that fair value should be based upon when pricing an asset or liability. The provisions of Statement 157amendments to ASC 805 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2007,2008. Prior to the adoption of ASC 805, in-process research and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided thatdevelopment costs were immediately expensed and acquisition costs were capitalized. Under ASC 805 all acquisition costs are expensed as incurred. The standard also pro vides guidance for recognizing and measuring the reporting entity has not yet issuedgoodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. In April 2009, the FASB updated ASC 805 to amend the provisions for that fiscal year. There isthe initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. This update also eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies. This standard had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    (iv)  In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance which is now part of ASC 825-10, “Financial Instruments” (formerly Financial Staff Position SFAS 157-2 defers107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1)). This statement amends FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments”, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. The statement also amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting”, to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements. This statement is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. This standard had no impact on the Statement’sCompany’s conso lidated financial statements.

    97
    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)
    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    For the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
    (In Canadian Dollars)


    16.
    Differences between Canadian and United States GAAP (Continued)

    d) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards (Continued)

    (v)  In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for accounting for subsequent events. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 855-10, “Subsequent Events” (formerly, SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”) is consistent with existing auditing standards in defining subsequent events as events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued, but it also requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. The new guidance defines two types of subsequent events: “recognized subsequent events” and “non-recognized subsequent events.” Recognized subsequent events provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date and must be reflected i n the company’s financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events provide evidence about conditions that arose after the balance sheet date and are not reflected in the financial statements of a company. Certain non-recognized subsequent events may require disclosure to prevent the financial statements from being misleading. The new guidance was effective on a prospective basis for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.

    (vi)  In February 2010, FASB issued ASU 2010-09, “Subsequent Event (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements”. ASU 2010-09 removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of GAAP. All of the amendments in ASU 2010-09 are effective upon issuance of the final ASU, except for the use of the issued date for certain non-financial assets and liabilities to fiscal years beginningconduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after NovemberJune 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of SFAS 157-2 is not expected to have an2010. This standard had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


    (vii)  
    (ii)

    In February 2007,June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued new guidance which is now part of ASC 860 (formerly SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option166), “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to SFAS No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). SFAS 166 eliminates the concept of a "qualifying special-purpose entity," changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and Financial Liabilities –requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, which permits entitiesentity's continuing involvement in and exposure to choosethe risks related to measure manytransferred financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option established byassets. SFAS 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Adoption166 is requiredeffective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption2009. This standard is permitted as of the beginning of the fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also electsnot expected to apply the provisions of SFAS 157. There is no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    85



    CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD. (An Exploration Stage Company)(viii)  
    NotesIn June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which is now part of ASC 810 (formerly SFAS No.167), “Amendments to Consolidated Financial Statements
    ForFASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”). The amendments include: (1) the years ended January 31,elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, (2) a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and (3) changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009 2008 and 2007
    (In Canadian Dollars)for interim periods within that first annual reporting period. This standard is not expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    18.16.

    Differences between Canadian and United States Generally AcceptedGAAP (Continued)

    d) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards (Continued)

    (ix)  In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Principles

    (Continued)

    d) Recently AdoptedStandards Update No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (“ASU 2009-05”). This update provides amendments to Accounting Standards


    (iii)

    SFAS No. 141(R) Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure”, Business Combinations,for the fair value measurement of liabilities when a quoted price in an active market is to replace SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The new statement retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be usednot available. ASU 2009-05 is effective for all business combinations. The newreporting periods beginning after August 28, 2009. This standard defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. The new statement improves the comparability of the information about business combinations provided in financial reports. SFAS No.141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    (iv)

    In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivatives instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s operating results, financial position, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company’s 2009 fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of SFAS 161. However, as the provisions of SFAS 161 are only related to disclosure of derivative and hedging activities, the Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS 161 will have a material impact on its consolidated operating results, financial position or cash flows.

    (v)

    In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. SFAS 162 is effective 60 days following the Securities and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of SFAS 162 but does not expect adoption to have a material impact on results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

    86


    98

    SIGNATURE


    The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

    Dated: August 14, 2009CORAL GOLD RESOURCES LTD.
     
       
    Dated: August 13, 2010 By:/s/ Louis /s/ David Wolfin
      LouisDavid Wolfin, Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)

    87


    99

    Exhibit Index

    Exhibit Number
    Name
    1.1Memorandum of Coral Gold Resources Ltd.*
    1.2.Articles of Coral Gold Resources Ltd.*
    8.1List of Subsidiaries
    12.1Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
    12.2Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
    13.1Certificate of Principal Executive Officer under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    13.2Certificate of Principal Financial Officer under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    13.3Consent of Expert
    13.4Consent of Expert
    13.5Consent of Expert
    13.6Consent of Expert
    15.1Geological Report on the Robertson Property*
    15.2Update of the Geological Report on the Robertson Property*

    _______________________

    ____________________
    *  Previously filed.

    88

    100