2017

Annual Report

on Form 20-F


 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

                                                   FORM 20-F/A

                                                                                 Amendment No. 120-F

(Mark One)

    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

Xx   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017

OR

    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        For the transition period from _________ to _________

OR

    SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        Date of event requiring this shell company report _________

Commission file number 1-15200

Statoil ASA

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s Name Into English)

Norway

(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

Forusbeen 50, N-4035, Stavanger, Norway

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Hans Jakob Hegge

Chief Financial Officer

Statoil ASA

Forusbeen 50, N-4035

Stavanger, Norway

Telephone No.: 011-47-5199-0000

Fax No.: 011-47-5199-0050

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

American Depositary Shares

New York Stock Exchange

Ordinary shares, nominal value of NOK 2.50 each

New York Stock Exchange

 

*Listed, not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:      None 

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:    None 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

 

Ordinary shares of NOK 2.50 each                                                                                      3,182,914,686

3,188,647,1033,323,167,853

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

Xx Yes   ☐ No

 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

Yes   Xx No

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Xx Yes   ☐ No

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).**

 

x Yes   ☐ No

**This requirement does not apply to the registrant in respect of this filing.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer   X

x                Accelerated filer   ☐                

Non-accelerated filer   ☐        Emerging growth company☐ 

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check

mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial

accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ 

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards

Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP   ☐ 

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board     X

Other    ☐ 

 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

 

Item 17    

 

 

 

Item 18    

 

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Yes   Xx No

 

 

            

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    1


Table of contents

 

INTRODUCTION

Message from Chair of the board

3

Chief executive letter

5

Statoil at a glance

6

About the report

9

STRATEGIC REPORT

2.1 Strategy and market overview

10

2.2 Business overview

15

2.3 E&P Norway - Exploration & Production Norway

21

2.4 E&P International - Exploration & Production International

28

2.5 MMP - Marketing, Midstream and Processing

37

2.6 Other group

40

2.7 Corporate

44

2.8 Operational performance

49

2.9 Financial review

64

2.10 Liquidity and capital resources

74

2.11 Risk review

79

2.12 Safety, security and sustainability

91

2.12 Our people

96

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

3.1 Introduction

100

3.2 General meeting of shareholders

103

3.3 Nomination committee

104

3.4 Corporate assembly

105

3.5 Board of directors

109

3.6 Management

118

3.7 Compensation of governing bodies

125

3.8 Share ownership

133

3.9 External auditor

134

3.10 Risk management and internal controls

136

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTS

4.1 Consolidated financial statements of the Statoil group

139

4.2 Supplementary oil and gas information

204

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

5.1 Shareholder information

217

5.2 Use and reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures

229

5.3 Legal proceedings

234

5.6 Terms and abbreviations

235

5.7 Forward-looking statements

238

5.8 Signature page

239

5.9 Exhibits

240

5.10 Cross reference to Form 20-F

241

2   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 


DEAR fellow investor

2017 has been a good year for Statoil, both operationally and financially. We have seen significant positive impacts from the improvements, and have benefitted from an upturn in the oil and gas market. And we have delivered on the sharpened strategy we launched in February 2017.

The 2017 net operating income ended positive with USD 13.8 billion, up from close to zero in 2016. Statoil continues to deliver on the improvement ambitions, and demonstrates strong operational performance. A free cash flow[1] of USD 3.1 billion made Statoil cash-flow neutral well below 50 USD per barrel.

Strong safety performance is essential to Statoil’s license to operate. The serious incident frequency for 2017 improved compared to 2016, however, it is key to remember that safety results must be delivered every day. The board of directors is working closely with the administration to ensure that forceful safety efforts and continued leadership focus are maintained.

We have seen a gradual rebalancing of the oil market and recovering prices. However, we should still be prepared for volatility. Key influencing factors are; geopolitical developments, OPEC policies, US shale response and the price impact of short-term trading activities. For the board of directors, it is essential that Statoil is a robust and resilient company, well equipped for different scenarios.

Statoil remains committed to competitive capital distribution. For the fourth quarter 2017 we propose to the annual general meeting (AGM) a dividend of 0.23 USD per share, an increase of 4.5%. This is in line with the dividend policy of increasing the dividend in line with long-term underlying earnings. In addition, Statoil has ended its two-year scrip programme as planned. We also see an emerging scope for share buy-backs, dependent on macro outlook and portfolio developments. However, the near-term priority is to strengthen the balance sheet.

Statoil has increased its production guiding while at the same time reducing capital expenditures. The improvements delivered over the last years have materially improved the financial position and competitiveness. This is reflected in operations and the next generation portfolio with a break-even price of 21 USD per barrel.

Statoil made 14 discoveries from 28 wells drilled in 2017, and have secured access to attractive new acreage, like in Argentina and Turkey, and strengthened the portfolio with acquisitions like Carcará North, Roncador in Brazil and Martin Linge in Norway.

Statoil is striving to further develop a distinct and competitive portfolio, driven by the strategy always safe, high value, low carbon. Statoil will leverage industrial strengths; operational excellence, world class recovery, leading project delivery, premium market access and digital leader, to develop long-term value on the Norwegian continental shelf, develop new growth options internationally and increase value creation in the marketing and midstream business.

The company continues to build a material industrial position in new energy solutions. Within offshore wind Statoil is competitive and well positioned. Statoil is now the operator of three offshore wind farms, and has also entered its first solar project through the acquisitions of a 43.75% share in the Apodi asset in Brazil.

Responding to the climate challenge and preparing Statoil for a low carbon future is an integrated part of the strategy. Concrete actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the operations have been implemented, and we are taking further steps to gradually build a more carbon resilient portfolio.

The board of directors believes the company is well prepared to deal with the current market situation and has the competence, capacity and leadership capabilities necessary to create new business opportunities and long-term value for our shareholders.

After the closing of the year, the board has decided to recommend to the AGM to change the company name from Statoil to Equinor. Our strategy remains firm, and the change is a natural follow up of the strategic development from a focused oil and gas to a broad energy company. The board sees the new name as a continuation of the company’s proud history, and a commitment to value creation also in a low carbon future.

I would like to thank all employees for their dedication and commitment to Statoil and our shareholders for their continued investment.

Jon Erik Reinhardsen

Chair of the board


[1] See section 5.2 Use and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    3


2015 Annual Report on Form 20-F

1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6

1.1 About the report ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6

1.2 Key figures and highlights ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7

2 Strategy and market overview ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8

2.1 Statoil’s business environment .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8

2.1.1 Market overview ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8

2.1.2 Oil prices and refining margins ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9

2.1.3 Natural gas prices ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10

2.2 Statoil’s corporate strategy ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10

2.3 Group outlook ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12

3 Business overview ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

3.1 Our history ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13

3.2 Our business .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13

3.3 Our competitive position .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14

3.4 Corporate structure ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14

3.5 Development and Production Norway (DPN) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16

3.5.1 DPN overview .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16

3.5.2 Fields in production on the NCS............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17

3.5.2.1 Operations North ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

3.5.2.2 Operations Mid-Norway ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

3.5.2.3 Operations West ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20

3.5.2.4 Operations South .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21

3.5.2.5 Partner-operated fields ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22

3.5.3 Exploration on the NCS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22

3.5.4 Fields under development on the NCS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

3.5.5 Decommissioning on the NCS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

3.6 Development and Production International (DPI) ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

3.6.1 DPI overview ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25

3.6.2 International production ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

3.6.2.1 North America .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

3.6.2.2 South America .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

3.6.2.3 Sub-Saharan Africa ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

3.6.2.4 North Africa ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

3.6.2.5 Europe and Asia ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30

3.6.3 International exploration .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31

3.6.4 Fields under development internationally .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

3.6.4.1 North America .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

3.6.4.2 South America .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34

3.6.4.3 Sub-Saharan Africa ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34

3.6.4.4 North Africa ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34

3.6.4.5 Europe and Asia ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

3.7 Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

3.7.1 MMP overview ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

3.7.2 Marketing and Trading ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37

3.7.2.1 Marketing and trading of gas and LNG ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

3.7.2.2 Marketing and trading of liquids .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38

3.7.3 Asset Management .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

3.7.3.1 Production plants ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38

3.7.3.2 Terminals and storage ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

3.7.3.3 Pipelines ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39

3.7.4 Processing and Manufacturing .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40

3.8 Other Group .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42

3.8.1 New Energy Solutions (NES) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42

3.8.2 Global Strategy and Business Development (GSB) ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 43

3.8.3 Technology, Projects and Drilling (TPD) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 43

3.8.4 Corporate staffs and support functions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 44

3.9 Significant subsidiaries ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45

3.10 Production volumes and prices .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45

3.10.1 Entitlement production .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45

3.10.2 Sales prices ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47

3.11 Proved oil and gas reserves .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48

2 Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015

3.11.1 Development of reserves...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52

3.11.2 Preparations of reserves estimates ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 53

3.11.3 Operational statistics ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53

3.11.4 Delivery commitments ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55

3.12 Applicable laws and regulations .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 55

3.12.1 Norwegian petroleum laws and licensing system ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 55

3.12.2 Gas sales and transportation from the NCS .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57

3.12.3 The Norwegian State's participation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 57

3.12.4 SDFI oil and gas marketing and sale ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57

3.12.5 HSE regulation .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 58

3.12.6 Taxation of Statoil .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 58

3.13 Property, plant and equipment .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60

3.14 Related party transactions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60

3.15 Insurance ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 60

3.16 People and the group ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

3.16.1 Employees in Statoil ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61

3.16.2 Equal opportunities ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62

3.16.3 Unions and representatives ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62

3.17 Safety, security and sustainability .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 63

4 Financial review ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65

4.1 Operating and financial review ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 65

4.1.1 Sales volumes .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 65

4.1.2 Group profit and loss analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 66

4.1.3 Segment performance and analysis ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70

4.1.4 DPN profit and loss analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 72

4.1.5 DPI profit and loss analysis ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73

4.1.6 MMP profit and loss analysis .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 75

4.1.7 Other operations......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 77

4.2 Liquidity and capital resources ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 78

4.2.1 Review of cash flows ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 78

4.2.2 Financial assets and debt ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 79

4.2.3 Investments .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 81

4.2.4 Impact of reduced prices ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 82

4.2.5 Principal contractual obligations ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 82

4.2.6 Off balance sheet arrangements........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83

4.3 Accounting Standards (IFRS) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83

4.4 Non-GAAP measures ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83

4.4.1 Return on average capital employed (ROACE) ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 83

4.4.2 Net debt to capital employed ratio ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 85

5 Risk review ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 86

5.1 Risk factors ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 86

5.1.1 Risks related to our business .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 86

5.1.2 Legal and regulatory risks ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 92

5.1.3 Risks related to state ownership ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 94

5.2 Risk management ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 95

5.2.1 Managing operational risk ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 95

5.2.2 Managing financial risk ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 95

5.2.3 Disclosures about market risk ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 97

5.3 Legal proceedings ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 97

6 Shareholder information ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98

6.1 Dividend policy .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 100

6.1.1 Dividends .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100

6.2 Shares purchased by issuer ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 101

6.2.1 Statoil's share savings plan .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 101

6.3 Information and communications ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102

6.3.1 Investor contact ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102

6.4 Market and market prices .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 103

6.4.1 Share prices ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 103

6.4.2 Statoil ADR programme fees .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 104

6.5 Taxation ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105

6.6 Exchange controls and limitations .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 108

6.7 Exchange rates .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 109

6.8 Major shareholders .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110

7 Corporate governance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 112

7.1 Articles of association .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 112

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015 3

7.2 Code of Conduct............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 113

7.3 General meeting of shareholders ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 114

7.4 Nomination committee................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 115

7.5 Corporate assembly ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116

7.6 Board of directors ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 119

7.6.1 Audit committee ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 123

7.6.2 Compensation and executive development committee ............................................................................................................................................................................ 124

7.6.3 Safety, sustainability and ethics committee .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 124

7.7 Compliance with NYSE listing rules ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 125

7.8 Management ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 127

7.9 Compensation to governing bodies ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 130

7.10 Share ownership ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 141

7.11 Independent auditor ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 141

7.12 Controls and procedures ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 143

8 Consolidated financial statements Statoil ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 144

8.1 Notes to the Consolidated financial statements ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 149

1 Organisation ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 149

2 Significant accounting policies ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 149

3 Segments ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 158

4 Acquisitions and disposals............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 161

5 Financial risk management ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 162

6 Remuneration .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 165

7 Other expenses ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 166

8 Financial items .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 167

9 Income taxes ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 168

10 Earnings per share ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 170

11 Property, plant and equipment ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 170

12 Intangible assets ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 173

13 Financial investments and non-current prepayments ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 175

14 Inventories ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 175

15 Trade and other receivables ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 176

16 Cash and cash equivalents ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 176

17 Shareholders' equity .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 176

18 Finance debt ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 177

19 Pensions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 178

20 Provisions ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 182

21 Trade and other payables .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 183

22 Leases ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 184

23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets ............................................................................................................................................................. 184

24 Related parties ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 186

25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk ...................................................................................................................... 187

26 Condensed consolidated financial information related to guaranteed debt securities ....................................................................................................................... 191

27 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited) ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 196

28 Subsequent events ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 206

8.2 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm ............................................................................................................................................................................... 207

8.2.1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm ...................................................................................................................................................................... 207

8.2.2 Report of KPMG on Statoil's internal control over financial reporting................................................................................................................................................. 208

9 Terms and definitons ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 209

10 Forward-looking statements ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 212

11 Signature page ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 213

12 Exhibits ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 214

13 Cross reference to Form 20-F......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 215

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

  

Statoil ASA (“Statoil”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A (the “Form 20-F/A”) to amend its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Form 20-F”) as originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 18, 2016. Due solely to an administrative error, certain of the information included in the 2015 Form 20-F was inadvertently omitted or published in Norwegian. For the convenience of the reader, the Amendment sets forth the original filing in its entirety, except that the following sections have been amended: Section 1.2, Section 4.2.1, Section 7.9, Section 8.0 and Section 8.1.

This Amendment does not contain any changes to data, disclosure or footnotes as otherwise presented in the 2015 Form 20-F.Other than as expressly set forth above, this Form 20-F/A does not, and does not purport to, revise, update, amend or restate the information presented in any Item of the 2015 Form 20-F or reflect events that have occurred after the filing of the 2015 Form 20-F. The 2015 Form 20-F continues to speak as of the dates described therein. This amendment should be read in conjunction with Statoil's filings made with the SEC subsequent to the 2015 Form 20-F, as information in such filings may update or supersede certain information contained in the 2015 Form 20-F and in this Form 20-F/A.

Statoil is filing as Exhibits 12.1 and 12.2 and 13.1 and 13.2 to this Form 20-F/A, currently dated certifications required under Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

4   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 


DEAR fellow SHAREHOLDER

As we have started a new year with new opportunities, it is useful to reflect briefly on the past. In 2017, we presented our strategy: always safe, high value, low carbon, and we set clear ambitions for the future. We have delivered above and beyond our ambitious targets, and Statoil is now a stronger, more resilient and more competitive company.

The safety of our people and integrity of our operations remains our top priority. Over the past decade we have steadily improved our safety results. Following some negative developments in 2016, we reinforced our efforts, and last year we again saw a positive development. For the year as a whole, our serious incident frequency came in at 0.6. We will use this as inspiration and continue our efforts. The “I am safety”-program, launched across the company is an important part of these efforts.

We must always be prepared for volatility in our markets. Our improvement work started when prices were still high, and we have used the downturn to reset the company. Today we are a much more robust and resilient company. We have taken down the break-even price of our next generation portfolio by more than 20% during last year to USD 21 per barrel.

Last year we said we would be cash flow positive at USD 50 per barrel in 2017. We did even better, and were cash flow positive well below USD 50. At an average Brent oil price of 54 per barrel, we generated USD 3.1 billion in free cash flow[2]. We tripled our adjusted earnings to USD 12.6 billion, and our net operating income was up from close to zero in 2016 to USD 13.8 billion last year. A negative net income in 2016 is turned to a positive result of USD 4.6 billion.

The organic capital expenditures ended at USD 9.4 billion[3], well below the USD 11 billion initially guided. The reduction is mainly due to solid improvements and continued strict capital discipline.

We continue to transform our cost base and value creation potential. With USD 1.3 billion in additional improvements in 2017, Statoil has realised annual efficiencies of USD 4.5 billion from 2013. In 2017 we also achieved a record high reserve replacement ratio (RRR) of 150% and all time high production. Looking forward the potential is solid towards 2020, with expected increase in annual production of 3-4%, strong cash generation and growing returns.

We have used the down-turn well, but the real test is taking place now, as prices are recovering. I have seen how easy it is for an organisation to start relaxing when prices recover. In Statoil we are determined and will not allow that to happen. We intend to reduce drilling costs further and sustain the 2017 unit of production costs in 2020.

In Statoil we believe the winners in the energy transition will be the producers which can deliver at low cost and with low carbon emissions. We also believe there are attractive business opportunities in the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Co2-emissions from our oil and gas production were reduced with an additional 10% per barrel last year. In the fall 2017 we started production from Dudgeon, and the floating windfarm Hywind. Today, we operate three offshore wind projects in the UK, delivering competitive returns. Statoil will continue its journey from a focused oil and gas to a broad energy company.

I believe Statoil is set to increase returns and grow our cash flow in the years to come. We are delivering on our strategy, investing in high-return opportunities, strengthening our balance sheet – and have increased the capital distribution. I look forward to further developing Statoil in 2018.

This year’s AGM will mark a historic moment for us. The board of directors recommends changing the company name from Statoil to Equinor. “Equi” is the starting point for words like equal, equality and equilibrium. “Nor” is signalling a company proud of its origin.

The name says something important about us as a company. What we stand for, where we come from and how we see the future. How we see people - and how we view energy.

The strategy we presented last year remains firm. And we think the name has potential to strengthen our attractiveness with investors, partners and not the least the new generation of talents we need to realise our strategy and reach our ambitions.

Eldar Sætre

President and Chief Executive Officer

Statoil ASA


[2]1 Introduction See section 5.2 Use and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures

[3]1.1 About the report


Statoil's Annual Report on Form 20-F IFRS capital expenditures for the year ended 31 December 2015 ("Annual Report on Form
20-F") is available online at
www.statoil.com2017 were USD 10.8 billion

Statoil is subject to the information requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to foreign private issuers. In accordance with these

requirements, Statoil files its Annual Report on Form 20-F and other related documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). It is also

possible to read and copy documents that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20549, US. You can also call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference rooms and their copy charges, or you can

log on to www.sec.gov. The report can also be downloaded from the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

Statoil discloses on its website at www.statoil.com/en/about/corporategovernance/statementofcorporategovernance/pages/default.aspx, and in its Annual Report on Form 20-F (Item 16G) significant ways (if any) in which its corporate governance practices differ from those mandated for US companies under the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") listing standards.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    5


 

1.2 Key figures and highlights

Statoil at a glance

Our history

Statoil was founded as Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap AS, the Norwegian State Oil company in 1972. Statoil became listed on

the Oslo Børs (Norway) and New York Stock Exchange (US) in June 2001. Statoil merged with Hydro’s oil and gas division in October 2007. Statoil is an international energy company present in more than 30 countries around the world, including several of the world’s most important oil and gas provinces. Our headquarter is located in Stavanger, Norway and we have 20.245 employees worldwide. We create value through safe and efficient operations, innovative solutions and technology. Statoil’s competitiveness is founded on our values-based performance culture, with a strong commitment to transparency, collaboration and continuous efficiency improvements.

The board of directors of Statoil have proposed to change the name of the company to Equinor. The new name supports the company’s strategy and development as a broad energy company.  The suggested name change will be proposed to the shareholders in a resolution to the annual general meeting on 15 May 2018.

Our vision

Our vision rests on three pillars: Competitive at all times, transforming the oil and gas industry and providing energy for a low-carbon future.

Our strategy

Statoil is an energy company committed to long-term value

creation in a low carbon future. Statoil will develop and maximise the value of its unique Norwegian continental shelf position, its international oil and gas business and its growing new energy business; focusing on safety, cost and carbon efficiency. Statoil is a values-based company where empowered people collaborate to shape the future of energy.

Our values

Our values embody the spirit and energy of Statoil at its best. They help us set direction and they guide our decisions,

actions and the way we interact with others. Our values express the ideals we strive to live up to every day.

Statoil’s values are: Open, Collaborative, Courageous and Caring.

Our activities

Statoil is engaged in exploration, development and production of oil and gas in addition to renewables. We are the leading operator on the Norwegian continental shelf and have substantial international activities. We sell crude oil and is a major supplier of natural gas. Processing, refining, offshore wind and carbon capture and storage is also part of our operations. Our activities are managed through eight business areas, staffs and support divisions and we have operations in both North and South America, Africa, Asia, Europe and Oceania, as well as in Norway.

Our shareholders

The Norwegian State is the largest shareholder in Statoil, with a direct ownership interest of 67%. Its ownership interest is managed by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. US investors hold 11%, Norwegian private owners hold 8%, other European investors hold 8%, UK investors hold 3% and others hold 2%.

Statoil announces dividends on a quarterly basis. It is Statoil's ambition to grow the annual cash dividend, measured in USD per share, in line with long-term underlying earnings.

 

Statoil publishes financial data in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and as adopted by the European Union (EU).

 

(in NOK billion, unless stated otherwise)

  For the year ended 31 December

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial information

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income4)

482.8

622.7

634.5

718.2

670.0

Net operating income

14.9

109.5

155.5

206.6

211.8

Net income

(37.3)

22.0

39.2

69.5

78.4

Non-current finance debt

264.0

205.1

165.5

101.0

111.6

Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments

122.0

89.2

58.0

39.3

71.0

Total assets

966.7

986.4

885.6

784.4

768.6

Share capital

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

8.0

Non-controlling interest

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.7

6.2

Total equity

355.1

381.2

356.0

319.9

285.2

Net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments

25.6%

19.0%

14.0%

10.9%

19.9%

Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted

26.8%

20.0%

15.2%

12.4%

21.1%

Calculated ROACE based on Average Capital Employed before adjustments

(8.0%)

2.7%

11.3%

18.7%

22.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operational information

 

 

 

 

 

Equity oil and gas production (mboe/day)

1,971

1,927

1,940

2,004

1,850

Proved oil and gas reserves (mmboe)

5,060

5,359

5,600

5,422

5,426

Reserve replacement ratio (three-year average)

0.81

0.97

1.15

1.01

0.90

Production cost equity volumes (NOK/boe, last 12 months)

48

49

44

42

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share information1)

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share NOK

(11.8)

6.87

12.50

21.60

24.70

Share price at Oslo Børs (Norway) on 31 December in NOK

123.70

131.20

147.00

139.00

153.50

Dividend per share NOK 2)

7.62

7.20

7.00

6.75

6.50

Dividend per share USD 2),3)

1.07

0.97

1.15

1.21

1.08

Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (in thousands)

3,179,443

3,179,959

3,180,684

3,181,546

3,182,113

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

See section 6 Shareholder information for a description of how dividends are determined and information on share repurchases.

The board of directors will propose the total 2015 dividend for approval at the annual general meeting scheduled for 11 May 2016.

2)

Proposed cash dividend for 2015. For 2015, the NOK amount covers first quarter while the USD amount is for second, third and fourth quarter. Figure presented for 2015 using the Central Bank of Norway 2015 year end rate for Norwegian kroner, which was USD 1.00 = 8.8090 NOK.

3)

Figures presented using the Central Bank of Norway year end rate for Norwegian kroner.

4)

Total revenues and other income for 2013 and 2012 are restated.

6   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20177


Key figures

(in USD million, unless stated otherwise)

  For the year ended 31 December

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial information

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income1)

61,187

45,873

59,642

99,264

108,318

Operating expenses

(8,763)

(9,025)

(10,512)

(11,657)

(12,669)

Net operating income/(loss)

13,771

80

1,366

17,878

26,572

Net income/(loss)

4,598

(2,902)

(5,169)

3,887

6,713

Non-current finance debt

24,183

27,999

29,965

27,593

27,197

Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments

15,437

18,372

13,852

12,004

9,542

Total assets

111,100

104,530

109,742

132,702

145,572

Total equity

39,885

35,099

40,307

51,282

58,513

Net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments 2)

27.9%

34.4%

25.6%

19.0%

14.0%

Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted 2)

29.0%

35.6%

26.8%

20.0%

15.2%

ROACE 3)

8.2%

(0.4%)

4.1%

8.7%

11.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operational data

 

 

 

 

 

Equity oil and gas production (mboe/day)

2,080

1,978

1,971

1,927

1,940

Proved oil and gas reserves (mmboe)

5,367

5,013

5,060

5,359

5,600

Reserve replacement ratio (annual)

1.50

0.93

0.55

0.62

1.28

Reserve replacement ratio (three-year average)

1.00

0.70

0.81

0.97

1.15

Production cost equity volumes (USD/boe)

4.8

5.0

5.9

7.6

7.5

Average Brent oil price (USD/bbl)

54.2

43.7

52.4

98.9

108.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share information 4)

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share (in USD)

1.40

(0.91)

(1.63)

1.21

2.14

Share price at Oslo Børs (Norway) on 31 December (in NOK)

175.20

158.40

123.70

131.20

147.00

Share price at New York Stock Exchange (USA) on 31 December (in USD)

21.42

18.24

13.96

17.61

24.13

Dividend paid per share (in USD) 5)

0.88

0.88

1.07

0.97

1.15

Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (in millions)

3,268

3,195

3,179

3,180

3,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Total revenues and other income for 2013 are restated.

2)

See section 5.2 Use and reconciliation of non-gaap financial measures for net debt to capital employed ratio.

3)

Calculated ROACE based on Adjusted earnings after tax and capital employed. See section 5.2 Use and reconciliation of non-gaap financial measures.

4)

See section 5.1 Shareholder information for a description of how dividends are determined and information on share repurchases.

5)

Dividends for the third and fourth quarter 2016 and the first and second quarter 2017 were paid in 2017. From and including the third quarter of 2015, dividends were declared in USD. Dividends in previous periods were declared in NOK. Figures for 2015 and earlier periods are presented using the Central Bank of Norway year end rates for Norwegian kroner.

 

8Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


 

2About the report

This document constitutes the Annual report on Form 20-F in accordance with the US Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to foreign private issuers, for Statoil ASA for the year ended 31 December 2017. A cross reference to the Form 20-F requirements are set out in section 5.10 in this report. The Annual report on Form 20-F and other related documents are filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual report and Form 20-F are filed with the Norwegian Register of company accounts.

The Statoil Annual report and Form 20-F may be downloaded from Statoil’s website at [Statoil.com/annualreport2017]. References to this document or other documents on Statoil’s website are included as an aid to their location and are not incorporated by reference into this document. All SEC filings made available electronically by Statoil may be obtained from the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.CC. 20549, United States or on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20179


2.1 Strategy and market overview

Statoil’s business environment

Market overview

In 2017 the world economy delivered the highest growth rate of the past six years. The world’s major economies are growing close to historical trends or above, and the emerging economies are recovering from their economic deceleration in 2016. The US economy is on a strong footing, with GDP growth estimated at 2.2% in 2017. Consumer spending, supported by higher employment, is the main driver of US growth. The Eurozone also showed robust growth estimated at 2.5%, thanks to private consumption and low inflation. In the UK, growth decelerated, with expected GDP growth at 1.8% due to uncertainty around the Brexit process. Chinese GDP growth has been reported at 6.9% in 2017, based on strong government policy stimulus, delivering an improvement in the growth rate for the first time since 2010. The Japanese economy performed relatively well, with an estimated growth rate of 1.8%, driven by a tight labour market, corporate earnings and a conducive external environment. As a notable exception, India at 6.5% growth, delivered below expectations as the economy had to adapt to the Goods and Services Tax and still felt the effects of demonetisation. Reduced inflationary pressure and appreciating currencies in Russia and Brazil have allowed central banks to cut interest rates, contributing to the countries’ economic recovery.

Looking forward, a robust demand picture and solid economic fundamentals should allow the expansion to continue. Among the risks that might affect such growth are geopolitical events and a too-fast monetary policy tightening from the central banks in key economies.

Global oil demand grew by 1.5 mmbbl per day in 2017 and global supply grew by 0.4 mmbbl per day. Decreasing oil prices in the first half of the year triggered both Opec and non-Opec countries to collectively honour their commitments to cut production. This resulted in stock draws and facilitated a gradual rebalancing of the market.

Overall, quarterly average European gas prices are up year-on-year throughout 2017. The first half of 2017 saw a downward trend in gas prices. However, in the second half of 2017, markets strengthened with demand growth in Asia leaving less LNG availability to serve a tight European market.

Oil prices and refining margins

A decreasing oil price in the first half of 2017 was followed by a strong second half with prices moving in an upward trajectory, closing the year at USD 66.5 per barrel. Refinery margins had a solid year fueled by strong demand in most products.

Oil prices
As in the previous two years, high volatility characterised the oil market. The average price for dated Brent crude in 2017 was USD 54.2 per barrel, up USD 10.5 per barrel from 2016. A relatively flat oil price fluctuating around USD 55 per barrel in the first couple of months was followed by a period of high volatility. Lingering worries about oversupply combined with surging output in Libya and Nigeria created a bearish sentiment with dated Brent bottoming out at USD 45 per barrel in late June. However, higher-than-expected demand and moderating global supply during the second half of 2017 put upward pressure on the commodity price. By the end of the third quarter, the price had reached almost USD 57 per barrel. Renewed buying interest in China and falling global stock piles facilitated continued rebalancing of the market throughout the fourth quarter. The upward pressure on the dated Brent oil price was strengthened even further by rising global geopolitical uncertainty, pushing prices to a two-year high of USD 62 per barrel in the first half of November. The Opec meeting in late November concluded with an agreement to extend oil supply cuts throughout 2018, with an option to review the deal in June. This gave support to the oil price through the last month of the year. Dated Brent was USD 66.5 per barrel on 31 December 2017. The futures market for Brent at the International Exchange Rate (ICE) was in contango until September before it shifted to backwardation and remained so for the rest of the year.

Over the course of 2017, global geopolitical unrest has been on the rise and received more attention as the market has become tighter.

US shale oil production has increased throughout 2017 due to continued productivity gains and cost reductions. The US is now delivering about 5 mmbbl per day of shale oil, with the Permian and Eagle Ford shale oil basins accounting for about two-thirds of the volumes. US crude oil exporters started to move cargoes toward high-growth markets in Asia as they capitalised on the favorable price differential. Development of Gulf Coast export capacity and crude price differentials are key determinants for future export levels.

Refining margins
Refining margins in Europe were strong in 2017. The moderate stock build in the first quarter of the year was followed by large draws in the next quarter due to strong demand. On the light end side, gasoline margins saw a moderate increase through the first half of the

10Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


year. High demand and strong prices for LPG, driven by changes in China’s energy mix, made the petrochemical industry take more naphtha, leaving less of the feedstock for making gasoline, eventually pushing prices. Stock draws in the US and strong demand in Europe supported diesel margins. The major impact of hurricane Harvey caused refining margins to peak by the end of the third quarter. A stronger physical crude oil market towards the end of the year put downward pressure on margins.

Natural gas prices

The upward trend in gas prices seen in the second half of 2016 continued into the first quarter of 2017, before taking a dip in second quarter 2017. The fourth quarter of 2017 experienced a robust price recovery.

 

TGas prices – Europehe profitability

NBP prices hit a decade low of USD 3 per mmBtu in August 2016, and increased towards an average of USD 5.7 per mmBtu in fourth quarter 2016. The climb continued into January 2017, averaging USD 6.6 per mmBtu, before falling throughout first and second quarter 2017 to USD 4.5 per mmBtu in June. Pipeline supply from the Norwegian Continental Shelf and Russia were at record highs of 117 bcm and 194 bcm respectively in 2017. However, the North-West Europe gas market has since late September 2017 been driven by a bullish combination of continued French nuclear outages, rallying coal prices, low hydro levels in Southern Europe and lower LNG availability in the Atlantic basin. The market tightened further due to the Rough storage shut-in and the new Groningen output ceiling, closing 2017 at USD 7.8 per mmBtu and resulting in an annual average of USD 5.8 per mmBtu.   

Gas prices – North America

The Henry Hub price remained stable throughout 2017, averaging USD 3 per mmBtu for the year. Prices peaked early in the year at USD 3.3 per mmBtu on seasonal uplift, before warmer weather weakened the market. Storage inventories have been consistently lower than levels last year, a main driver as to why prices are up year-on-year. The lack of a significant mid-year cooling related to demand peak left summer prices lower than normal and lower than the spring prices. In fourth quarter 2017, robust production growth has limited upside price risks and put a premium on winter heating loads as the market weighs new pipeline takeaway capacity slowly coming online in the Northeast.  

Global LNG prices

LNG prices in Asia ended 2016 at USD 9 per mmBtu. From here, monthly prices fell throughout first quarter 2017 and stabilised at USD 5.5 per mmBtu in second quarter 2017. The second half of the year experienced robust price recovery to an average of USD 9.4 per mmBtu in fourth quarter 2017, resulting in an annual average of USD 7.1 per mmBtu. Despite new LNG supply from Australia and the US, a marked pick-up in consumption across Asia has affected the market. Increased coal-to-gas switching to curb air pollution was seen in China. In South Korea and Taiwan gas stepped in for reduced nuclear capacity.

Statoil’s corporate strategy

Statoil is an energy company committed to long-term value creation in a low carbon future. Statoil will develop and maximise the value of its unique Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) position, its international oil and gas industrybusiness and its growing new energy business, focusing on safety, value and carbon efficiency. Statoil is a values-based company where empowered people collaborate to shape the future of energy. 

Statoil's top priority in 2017 continued to be to conduct safe, secure and reliable operations with zero harm to people and the environment.

In 2017 Statoil launched its sharpened strategy. Geopolitical shifts, challenges in liquids resource replenishments, market cyclicality, structural changes to costs and increasing momentum towards low carbon implies uncertainty and volatility. To be prepared, Statoil is focusing on building a more resilient, diverse and option-rich portfolio, delivered by an agile organisation that embraces change and empowers its people. To deliver on the sharpened strategy, “always safe, high value, low carbon”, Statoil will continue to build opportunities to optimise its portfolio around the following portfolio areas:

·Norwegian continental shelf – Build on unique position to maximise and develop long-term value

·International oil & gas – Deepen core areas and develop growth options

·New energy solutions – Create a material new industrial position

·Midstream and marketing – Secure premium market access and grow value creation through cycles

The following strategic principles guide Statoil in actively shaping its future portfolio:

·Cash generation capacity at all times – Generating positive cash flows from operations, even at low oil and gas prices, in order to sustain dividend and investment capacity through the economic cycles

·Capex flexibility – Having sufficient flexibility in organic capital expenditure to be able to respond to market downturns and avoid value destructive measures

·Capture value from cycles – Ensuring the ability and capacity to act counter-cyclically to capture value through the cycles

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201711


·Low-carbon advantage – Maintaining competitive advantage as a leading company in carbon efficient oil and gas production, while building a low-carbon business to capture new opportunities in the energy transition

In order to deliver on the strategy, Statoil has identified four key strategic enablers that will continue to support the business’s needs:

·Safe and secure operations

·Technology, digitalisation and innovation

·Empowered people

·Stakeholder engagement

Statoil has a target to implement CO2 emission reduction measures equivalent to 3 million tonnes annually from its emissions between 2017 and 2030 and continues to make progress towards this goal. A significant portfolio of projects and initiatives has been established through 2017 with variable maturity to accomplish the 2030 commitments. Further communication on this can be found in Statoil’s 2017 Sustainability Report.

Norwegian continental shelf – Build on unique position to maximise and develop long-term value

For more than 40 years, Statoil has explored, developed and produced oil and gas from the NCS. Statoil aims to deepen and prolong its position by accessing and maturing opportunities into valuable production. At the same time, Statoil plans to improve the efficiency, reliability, carbon emissions and lifespan of fields already in production. The NCS represents approximately two thirds of Statoil’s equity production at 1,334 mboe per day in 2017.

Exploration: Statoil continues to be challengeda committed NCS explorer across mature, growth and Statoil’s financial resultsfrontier areas. In 2017, Statoil participated in 2015 were influenced17 exploration wells on the NCS, resulting in 10 commercial discoveries. Statoil was awarded 31 licences in mature areas in Norway’s Awards for Predefined Areas (APA) 2017 round (result announced January 2018), 17 as operator and 14 as a non-operating partner

Development: Statoil has submitted five plans for development and operation in 2017: Njord, Bauge and Trestakk in the Norwegian Sea, Johan Castberg in the Barents Sea and Snorre Expansion Project in the North Sea. Johan Sverdrup Phase 1 is proceeding as scheduled and the pre-sanction for Johan Sverdrup Phase 2 was approved by the fallpartners in the first quarter of 2017. The Aasta Hansteen project continued as planned and the Oseberg H Unmanned Wellhead Platform was installed in 2017.

Production: Gina Krog came on-stream in 2017. Statoil opened the Valemon onshore control room, enabling remote control.

Statoil will take over operatorship and equity in the Martin Linge field and Garantiana discovery. Two Cat J rigs, Askeladden and Askepott, were delivered to Statoil ready for digitalised operations at Gullfaks and Oseberg.

International oil prices. and gas – Deepen core areas and develop growth options

International oil and gas production represented approximately one third of Statoil’s equity production at 745 mboe per day in 2017. Statoil will continue to explore, develop, and produce oil and gas opportunities outside Norway as part of deepening its international core areas, the US onshore operations and Brazil, and developing future growth options.

Exploration: Statoil continues to explore internationally for oil and gas. Statoil participated in 11 exploration wells internationally, four of which were discoveries. Statoil added exploration acreage in Brazil, South Africa, UK, Suriname and the US Gulf of Mexico and entered one new country, Argentina.

Development: Statoil continued to strengthen its strategic partnership with Petrobras in Brazil, continuing construction on Peregrino Phase II and improving the project economics. Offshore UK, Mariner A has been installed and is currently in the hook-up and commissioning phase.

Production: Alongside operator BP and other partners, Statoil has signed the agreement for a licence extension by 25 years until 2049 for Azeri-Chirag Guneshli (ACG) with the Azerbaijan government and SOCAR. Statoil and BP, with Sonatrach, also extended the In Amenas Production Sharing Contract (PSC) by five years, from 2022 to 2027.

Statoil completed its divestment from the Canadian oil sands.

In Brazil, a 25% share in the producing Roncador field was acquired. Statoil also strengthened its position in the BM-S-8 licence, which includes the Carcara discovery, by acquiring QGEP’s interest and successfully bidding on the open acreage to the North, before farming down to ExxonMobil and Petrogal.

In the United States, Statoil continued to focus on increasing and sustaining the profitability of existing assets in the portfolio, which led to continued progress towards the targets of lowering its US portfolio net operating income break-even to below USD 50 per barrel and increasing production by 50% from 2014 to 2018.

New energy solutions – Create a material new industrial position

12StricterStatoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil’s ambition is to maintain its advantage as a leading company in carbon efficient oil and gas production while building a low-carbon business to capture new opportunities in the energy transition. Statoil continues to explore new business opportunities in offshore wind, solar, carbon capture and storage (CCS) as well as other potential new energy markets. Statoil expects 15-20% of its investments to be directed towards new energy solutions by 2030.

Develop opportunities: Progress continues on the Arkona offshore wind farm operated by partner E.On. Statoil continues to evaluate a potential Norwegian carbon and capture storage as well as the feasibility of natural gas-to-hydrogen projects. In the United States, Statoil continues to mature the New York Wind Energy Area lease as “Empire Wind”. 

Operate assets: In 2017, Statoil completed and opened the Dudgeon Offshore Wind Park. Hywind Scotland, the world’s first floating wind farm, also started production.

Statoil completed a re-organisation of the Dogger Bank consortium Forewind in the UK, splitting ownership of three of the four projects 50/50 with partner SSE and with Innogy (RWE) taking sole ownership of the remaining project. In December Statoil submitted a bid in the non-subsidy Dutch offshore wind tender for Hollanse Kust Zuid I & II. Statoil also initiated its first move into solar by acquiring 50% of the ongoing Apodi solar project prioritisationin Brazil from Scatec Solar.

Midstream and a comprehensive efficiency programme are showing progressmarketing – Secure premium market access and grow value creation through cycles

The prime objective for Statoil’s mid- and downstream activities is to process and transport its oil and gas production (including the Norwegian State’s petroleum) competitively to premium markets, securing maximum value realisation. The main focus has been on:

·Safe, secure and efficient operations

·Minimising carbon emissions and intensity

·Securing flow assurance and premium market access for Statoil’s equity production and the State’s Direct Financial Interest (SDFI) volumes

·Building and maintaining resilience through asset backed trading, value chain positioning and counter-cyclical actions

·Focus on regional piped gas value chains and pursue selective trading positions in LNG

In 2017, Statoil chartered the ultra-large crude carrier (ULCC) TI Europe as part of its asset backed trading strategy. Statoil decided to phase out the Mongstad combined heat and power by end 2018 and commissioned the Polarled pipeline. Statoil continued work towards integrating digital solutions into decision making, shipping activities, and energy trading.

Strategy enablers

Safe and secure operations: Safety and security is Statoil’s top priority. In 2017, Statoil initiated and continued several measures to reinforce safety work in all areas including continuous co-operation with partners and suppliers. The primary efforts launched in 2017 were focused on safety (I am Safety), security (2020 Security Roadmap), and IT security (New Information Technology Strategy) and are expecteddescribed in the chapter "Safeguarding people, the environment and assets: Safety and security.”

Technology, digitalisation and innovation: Statoil's technology strategy provides long-term guidance for technology development and implementation. In 2017, Statoil launched its digital roadmap and established its Digital Centre of Excellence and Digital Academy. Statoil, in partnership with Techstars, established an energy-focused accelerator in Oslo.

Empowered people: Statoil promotes a culture of collaboration, innovation and safety, guided by its values. Statoil has continued to continuedevelop its employees and attract talents to improve cash flowdeliver on the future-fit portfolio ambition.

Stakeholder engagement: Statoil engages with stakeholders to secure industrial legitimacy, its social contract, trust and profitability. Statoil proposesstrategic support from stakeholders. This engagement extends to the annual general meeting a scrip dividend from the fourth quarter of 2015. Statoil’s strong financial position provides a firm basis on which to balance capital investmentinternal and dividends to shareholders,external collaboration, partnerships, and other co-operation with suppliers, partners, governments, NGOs and communities in which Statoil expects to grow in line with its long-term earnings.operates.

 

Last yearGroup outlook

Statoil’s plans address the current business environment while continuing to invest in high-quality projects. Statoil outlined planscontinues to further strengthenreiterate its competitiveness, and is now reinforcing its effortefforts and commitment to deliver on its priorities of high value creation, increased efficiency and competitive shareholder returns. Through Statoil`s flexibility in its investment programme Statoil believes that it is well prepared for potential sustained market volatility and uncertainty.return.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201713


·Organic capital expenditures[4] for 2018 are estimated at around USD 11 billion

·Statoil intends to continue to mature its large portfolio of exploration assets and estimates a total exploration activity level of around USD 1.5 billion for 2018, excluding signature bonuses

·Statoil’s ambition is to further reduce costs and improve efficiency was presented atkeep the capital markets update (CMU) on 6 February 2015. Then,unit of production cost in the company announced that it was targeting annual savingstop quartile of USD 1.7 billion from 2016 (pre-tax) as measured against the cost base of 2013. Having already realised $1.9 billion in savings (pre-tax), Statoil announced a new goal at the CMU on 4 February 2016. The company will step up its efficiency programme by 50% with a goal to realise USD 2.5 billion in annual savings from 2016 (pre-tax), again as measured against the cost base of 2013.peer group

·          The step-up of $0.8 billionFor the period 2017 – 2020, production growth is expected to be dividedaround 3-4% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)

·Production for 2018 is estimated to be 1-2% above the 2017 level

·Scheduled maintenance activity is estimated to reduce equity production by two-thirds capital expenditures (capex) and one-third operational expenditures (opex).around 30 mboe per day for the full year of 2018

 

Improvement programmes are Statoil’s response to the industrial challenges characterised by high costs and declining returns. More specifically, the ambition is to realise positive production effects and cost savings to improve Statoil’s financial results and cash-flows.

These forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and are, by their nature, subject to significant risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. See section 10 Forward-Looking Statements for more information

2.1 Statoil’s business environment

2.1.1 Market overview

Global economic GDP growth eased in 2015, to 2.4% from 2.6% in 2014. This largely reflects weakness in non-OECD economies where activity decelerated over the year. Growth in OECD, on the other hand, held up relatively well at around 2%, supporting overall economic growth and energy demand.

The underlying fundamentals of the United States economy remain sound and GDP growth ticked up slightly to 2.5% in 2015 from 2.4% in 2014. GDP growth also accelerated nominally in the Eurozone to 1.5%, supported by low energy prices, reduced fiscal headwinds, more monetary stimulus and a weak euro. UK GDP growth slowed in 2015, but remains decent at 2.4%, whereas Japan barely avoided its fourth recession in five years. Growth in emerging countries slipped to 3.6% in 2015, reflecting both weakness in commodity prices and domestic challenges. Deep recessions have emerged in Brazil and Russia, whilst China continues on an intended path of gradual deceleration and consequent structural reforms. Net commodity importers such as India are doing much better, and India’s GDP growth rate outpaced China’s in 2015.

Several major forces are at play in the global economy and will continue to affect demand, including soft commodity prices and persistently low interest rates, increasingly divergent monetary policies across major economies, and weak world trade. In particular, the sharp decline in oil prices since mid-2014 has supported global economic activity and is expected to continue to do so in 2016.

Global oil demand grew by a healthy 1.6 mmbbl per day in 2015, driven by a colder than normal winter in the US and Northern Europe and the lower prices of crude oil. Demand growth in absolute terms was highest in China, despite 2015 being a challenging year for Chinese stock markets and the Chinese economy in general. Non-Opec producers have proven to be resilient to lower prices and grew production by 1.3 mmbbl per day in 2015 while Opec added 1.1 mmbbl per day to their production, mainly from Saudi Arabia and Iraq. This has postponed the rebalancing between supply and demand and has led to a continued drop in oil prices.

2015 saw moderate growth in gas supply and demand of 1.5%, which is below the growth rates of the previous years. The United States is the main driver behind the growth. Europe experienced a weather-driven increase in demand as compared to 2014. Gas consumption declined in Japan and South Korea due to weak power sector gas demand caused by the (re)start of coal and nuclear power plants. Gas demand growth slowed in China and other emerging markets, with more competitively priced oil products being one contributing factor. In the United States, a

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20157


multi-year wave of gas supply growth came to an end in 2015, but demand could not keep up with supply growth, and prices fell. A strong supply of pipeline gas to Europe and an emerging oversupply of LNG have further depressed gas prices.

8Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The global economic situation continues to be fragile, with development partly driven by uncertain political environments in key countries and regions, in addition to normal supply and demand factors. The situation at the end of 2015, with high storage levels and low prices, will continue to put pressure on international oil companies to increase efficiency and reduce costs. This will contribute to a gradual rebalancing of markets for oil and gas. The impact of this on price levels and price developments is very uncertain.

2.1.2 Oil prices and refining margins

High volatility characterised the oil market in 2015, with the price of Brent in a range between USD 66 per barrel in May to USD 35 per barrel at the end of December. Refinery margins were well above normal levels due to low crude prices throughout the year.

Oil prices

The average price for dated Brent crude in 2015 was USD 53/bbl, down 47% from 2014. The price was at USD 55/bbl in the beginning of 2015, on a downward trajectory. A temporary low was reached at just above USD 45/bbl in the middle of January before the prices started climbing again. A positive market sentiment drove the price of dated Brent up in the second quarter. Signs of a downturn in the Chinese economy and the nuclear deal between P5+1 and Iran contributed to a declining market sentiment and prices fell again to a new low in August. The price of dated Brent recovered somewhat again in the 3rd quarter and in to the 4th quarter, before the 168th Opec meeting on the 4th of December. No action was agreed by the Opec member countries and the price of Brent went below USD 40/bbl for the first time since the spring of 2009. The dated Brent price was USD 36/bbl on 31 December 2015, a year-end level not seen for a decade. The futures market for Brent at the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) was in contango throughout 2015. See section 9 Terms and definitions for further details.

Although the conflict level in Syria increased further and the armed conflict in Yemen added tension in the Middle East, geopolitical events had less effect on the crude oil prices in 2015, compared with the previous year.

Opec’s decision, in late 2014, to not balance the market, marked the change of a 30-year old strategy. Subsequent to this the oil market was highly volatile throughout 2015, while the participants endeavoured to find the new price level of crude oil. Although oil demand increased by 1.6 mmbbl per day, much due to a cold winter and low prices, the market remained oversupplied throughout the whole year, with total supply growth of 2.4 mmbbl per day of production. As a consequence, the global oil stocks were at historically high levels by year-end. 

2015 was an eventful year for North American (NA) crude. The price of US WTI crude, as quoted at the Cushing tank farm in Oklahoma, averaged USD 49/bbl in 2015, down 47% from 2014. The price of WTI was USD 53/bbl at the beginning of the year. On 31 December 2015 the WTI price was at USD 37/bbl, roughly at par with first month Brent. With low crude prices through 2015, rig counts have dropped and production growth has faltered. At the same time, crude inventories have continued to grow, further weighing on crude prices. New pipeline and crude distillation capacity, coupled with slower production growth, have created a tighter balance for US light crude, easing the large price discounts of inland crudes relative to Brent. The easing of discounts has challenged the economics of more expensive transport solutions such as rail relative to pipeline, such that crude by rail loadings have declined dramatically during 2015. In late 2015, the US government passed legislation allowing unrestricted export of crude oil for the first time since the 1970s. While little impact is expected in the global market short term, given the current oversupplied global crude market, unrestricted US crude exports provides producers with greater access to higher value global crude markets and could impact price differentials.

Refining margins

Refinery margins in Northwest Europe, as calculated against dated Brent crude, were well above normal in 2015. One reason for the strength was the weak crude oil market, with dated Brent priced below the first forward month at the ICE exchange throughout the year. Further, the price differentials vs. Brent for the crude oils actually used were lower than last year. The other main factor was a very strong gasoline market. Low price levels at the pump led to rising demand in the US, and gasoline demand in Europe stopped falling. Changes to the Chinese economy led to more emphasis on the consumer sector. New car sales in China almost matched that of the US, and some 80% were net additions to the fleet. Chinese gasoline demand therefore rose almost as much as in the US, and strong growth was also seen in India and Pakistan. This demand growth led to capacity constraints at refineries, in particular for high-octane components. Europe, being in net surplus on gasoline, was able to export more into these markets, with parts of it going as high-octane components at strong price premiums. For naphtha, which is a feedstock both for the petrochemical industry and for making gasoline, Asian demand for imports from Europe rose through the year and gave very strong margins here. On the other hand, new refineries in Asia and the Middle East were geared towards diesel production. New diesel volumes exported to Europe led to rising inventory levels here, despite a quite strong demand growth. The situation became dramatic in the fourth quarter of 2015, when high refinery throughputs in order to make enough gasoline and naphtha led to excess diesel production. This made diesel tanks go full and the diesel margin decreased. LPG was oversupplied due to high exports from the US. Heavy fuel oil was oversupplied due to declining demand. However, against the low Brent crude oil prices, both products still saw quite normal margins.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20159


2.1.3 Natural gas prices

Natural gas prices fell during 2015 in most markets. European gas prices reached the lowest level since early 2010. Reasons include weak demand, good supplies and low prices for coal, oil and other competing fuels. Henry Hub gas prices in the United States also declined during 2015, and the prices at year-end were at the lowest level since the 1990s.

Gas prices - Europe

European gas market prices averaged USD 6.5/mmBtu in 2015, down 20% from 2014. EU gas consumption for heating purposes recovered in 2015 as temperatures returned to more normal levels after a particularly mild winter in 2014. The use of gas for power generation increased in Southern Europe due to high summer temperatures, but declined in other parts of Europe. High availability of wind in 2015 and a steady growth in renewable generation capacity made inroads in the overall need for gas-fired and other thermal power plants in Europe.

Norwegian exports of pipeline gas reached record-levels of 108 bcm in 2015. EU indigenous gas production fell by 10% to 125 bcm as the Dutch government lowered existing production caps at the large Groningen field as a response to earthquake activity. Russia exported more than 150 bcm of pipeline gas to Europe in 2015, close to recent historical highs. Europe imported around 50 bcm LNG in 2015, more than in 2014, but still 35 bcm below the peak a few years ago.

Gas prices - North America

First quarter prices centered on USD 3/mmBtu, while second and third quarter prices fluctuated around USD 2.75/mmBtu, with weather-related ups and downs. However, in the fourth quarter prices fell and reached USD 1.50/mmBtu at the end of the year, as storage rose to new record highs and an El Niño weather event quashed demand in the winter peak season. As a result, the Henry Hub average of USD 2.6/mmBtu was the lowest annual price in over a decade, down from USD 4.4/mmBtu in 2014.

US gas producers responded to the falling prices by withdrawing rigs. Gas production peaked at the end of the summer and supply has been falling since. Demand for gas was strong in 2015, with natural gas for the first time exceeding coal use in the power sector for most of the year.

Global LNG prices

Global prices for LNG have plummeted. Prices under long-term LNG contracts to buyers in Asia are tracking oil prices with a lag, and contract prices were typically down 40% from 2014. The price assessment for spot LNG cargoes in Asia reached USD 7.5/mmBtu over the year compared to USD 14/mmBtu in 2014. LNG prices are now back to levels prior to the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011. The global LNG market has entered a period where the growth of supplies from Australian, US and other liquefaction projects could exceed demand.

2.2 Statoil’s corporate strategy

Statoil creates value by accessing, exploring, developing, and producing energy sources globally, and by enhancing the value of such production through its mid- and downstream positions.

Fundamental changes are happening in the oil and gas industry. The industry faces new challenges, such as increased pressure on margins, changing patterns of energy supply and consumption, geopolitical instability and rising climate change concerns.

Statoil's top priorities remain to conduct safe and reliable operations with zero harm to people and the environment, and to grow value through disciplined investments and prudent financial management with competitive redistribution of capital to shareholders. To succeed going forward in turning Statoil’s vision into reality, Statoil pursues a strategy that will:

·Deepen and prolong Statoil’s NCS position

·Grow material and profitable international positions

·Pursue focused and value-adding mid- and downstream activities

·Provide energy for a low carbon future

In addition, Statoil will research, develop, and deploy technology to create opportunities and enhance the value of Statoil’s current and future assets.

10Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Deepen and prolong Statoil’s NCS position

For more than 40 years, Statoil has explored, developed and produced oil and gas from the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). Statoil aims to deepen and prolong its position by accessing and maturing opportunities into valuable production. At the same time Statoil plans to improve the reliability and lifespan of fields already in production.

·ExplorationStatoil has proven to be a committed NCS explorer across mature, growth, and frontier areas. In the last year, Statoil participated in 21 completed exploration wells of which 10 were discoveries. Statoil announced discoveries in the Aasta Hansteen area, the Krafla area, and the King Lear area. Statoil applied for new acreage in the Barents Sea as part of the 23rd licensing round and entered the Barents Sea Exploration Collaboration with four other oil and gas explorers to address common operational challenges. Statoil also applied for additional NCS licenses during the 2015 Awards in Predefined Areas (APA) with the results awarded in 2016

·DevelopmentStatoil received approval from the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy for the plan for development and operation (PDO) for Johan Sverdrup Phase I and awarded several related key contracts to suppliers. The development plan for Johan Sverdrup Phase II, along with other projects, continues to be matured. In 2015, Statoil delayed the concept selection for Johan Castberg, Snorre 2040 and Trestakk (sanctioned early 2016) to secure robust development solutions. Gina Krog’s expected start-up is now 2017 with the steel jacket having been installed and predrilling of the production wells started

·ProductionStatoil began production from Valemon, Oseberg Delta 2, Gullfaks South Oil, Smørbukk South Extension and the Lundin-operated Edvard Grieg field. Three major projects to increase recovery have been delivered in 2015; at Troll A two new gas compressors were installed, the Åsgard subsea compression, the world’s first subsea gas compression plant, came on stream, and the world’s first subsea wet gas compressor is nearing completion at Gullfaks

Statoil made further portfolio adjustments to improve its NCS position. Statoil increased its share in the Alfa Sentral project, which straddles the border of the NCS and UK continental shelf (UKCS). Statoil’s equity share now stands at 24% in licence P312 on the UKCS and 62% in licence PL046 on the NCS (Statoil-operated); the two licenses together comprise the Alfa Sentral field. Statoil also farmed down in the Gudrun field. Statoil remains the operator of the field.

The target to reduce CO2 emissions on the NCS was increased to 1.2 million tonnes by 2020, which is up 50% from the initial target of 800,000 tonnes. The initial target was set in 2008 and is expected to be reached in 2016.

Grow material and profitable international positions

International oil and gas production represents approximately 37% of Statoil’s equity production and now stands at 739 kboe/d. Statoil will continue to explore, develop, and produce oil and gas opportunities outside Norway to enhance Statoil’s upstream portfolio.

·ExplorationStatoil is an active international explorer for oil and gas. In the last year, Statoil participated in 18 completed exploration wells of which eight were discoveries. Statoil focused in Canada, Tanzania, Brazil, the UK and the US Gulf of Mexico. Statoil announced a gas discovery in Tanzania (Mdalasini-1). Statoil accessed new acreage in Canada, New Zealand, Indonesia, Mozambique, Russia, and the US Gulf of Mexico, and entered three new countries, Nicaragua, South Africa, and Uruguay. Government approval is pending for the newly acquired acreage in Mozambique, South Africa, and Uruguay. Statoil exited both our operated and non-operated licenses in the Chukchi Sea (Alaska). Statoil also closed its office in the Faroe Islands following the relinquishment of our exploration acreage

·DevelopmentIn Europe, the partner-operated Corrib gas field in Ireland came on stream at the end of 2015; meanwhile, Statoil postponed the Mariner field’s start-up date to 2018. In the US Gulf of Mexico, the partner-operated Heidelberg project entered its final stages in 2015 as it prepared for first oil in early 2016, meanwhile Big Foot was postponed due to technical challenges in the final project stage

·ProductionProduction has steadily increased from fields such as CLOV in Angola and Jack/St. Malo in the US Gulf of Mexico. In the US, further optimisation of the onshore portfolio targeting cost improvements has been on-going, including the reorganisation of some of the activities to extract greater synergies

Statoil made further portfolio adjustments to improve its international exploration portfolio. Statoil sees value in gaining operatorships, and in 2015 Statoil became the operator in BM-C-33 offshore Brazil, which contains the Pão de Açúcar, Seat, and Gávea discoveries. Statoil also completed an agreement to reduce Statoil’s average working interest in Statoil’s non-operated US southern Marcellus onshore asset from 29% to 23%. In another transaction, Statoil acquired an additional 13% interest in Statoil’s Eagle Ford joint venture and became its sole operator.

Pursue focused and value-adding mid- and downstream activities

The prime objective for Statoil’s mid- and downstream activities is to process and transport its oil and gas production (including the Norwegian State’s petroleum) competitively to premium markets, securing maximum value realisation. The priorities are:

·High regularity in midstream operation and continuous improvement within HSE, efficiency and costs

·Market Statoil’s equity production (crude oil, natural gas, related products) and the State’s Direct Financial Interest (SDFI) volumes for maximum value creation

·Develop the Asset Backed Trading model across commodities

·Maintain the position as a leading European gas supplier

·A capital lean asset structure

Strategic focus is directed at optimising the value of Statoil’s flexible Norwegian gas production assets that supply Europe and Statoil’s midstream activities in North America, where Statoil’s onshore un-conventionals portfolio is progressing and where margin capture is important. Statoil achieved strong trading results across all commodities and robust refinery results through good margins, cost reductions and high availability.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201511


Strategic progress in Statoil’s mid- and downstream portfolio has been made in 2015. Export pipelines for the Utsira High and the Norwegian Sea (Polarled) were installed. Statoil agreed to divest its 20% stake in the Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG in 2015 following earlier divestments in 2014.


Providing energy for a low carbon future

Statoil recognises that opportunities are increasingly available in producing low carbon energy. In 2015, Statoil created a new business area, New Energy Solutions, to further access, develop, and produce low carbon energy when and where it is deemed valuable.

·Development: In the 4th quarter 2015, Statoil sanctioned Hywind Scotland Offshore Floating Test Park in Scotland; Statoil’s ownership share is 100%. The park will have a total installed capacity of 30 MW and planned production start-up is 2017. The Dudgeon Offshore Wind Park sanctioned in 2014 is progressing as planned towards start-up in 2017; Statoil’s ownership share is 35%. The park will have a total installed capacity of 402 MW. The Forewind consortium, comprising Statoil, Statkraft, RWE and SSE, all with a 25% owner stake, continues to mature projects and has received consent for four 1.2 GW projects in the Dogger Bank Area off the UK east coast

·Production: Statoil is a non-operating partner in the Scira consortium (40% owner stake) which produces electricity from the Sherringham Shoal wind park in the UK. The park has an installed capacity of 317 MW

Research, development, and deployment of technology to unlock opportunities and enhance value

Statoil believes that technology is a critical success factor in the current business environment. Statoil’s technology development activities aim to reduce field development, drilling and operating costs, and CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. Statoil’s technology efforts focus on the following priority areas:

·Business-critical technologies: Upstream technologies are prioritised, primarily in the areas of Exploration, Reservoir, Drilling and Well and Subsea production systems. Statoil’s main focus has been on cost reduction, for example further development of the steerable drilling liner system to reduce well construction costs

·Strengthening Statoil’s licence to operate: Statoil’s commitment to sustainability continues. Statoil’s ongoing “Powering collaboration” agreement with GE aims to accelerate the development of more sustainable energy solutions by addressing CO2 and methane emissions, water usage and energy optimisation of operations. Statoil is also addressing energy efficiency of operating assets by, e.g. implementing on-line water wash systems on gas turbines

·Expanding Statoil’s capabilities: Statoil’s technical capabilities are expanding to meet the challenges of the New Energy Solutions business area for renewable and low carbon energy solutions. Technology development is conducted in-house, in collaboration with suppliers and through venture activities. A key technological focus area is finding more efficient ways of producing clean energy, particularly by reducing costs in the areas of construction and maintenance for both fixed and floating offshore wind applications

2.3 Group outlook

Statoil’s plans address the current environment while continuing to invest in high-quality projects. Statoil continues to reiterate its efforts and commitment to deliver on its priorities of high value creation, increased efficiency and competitive shareholder return.

·Organic capital expenditures for 2016 (i.e. excluding acquisitions, capital leases and other investments with significant different cash flow pattern) are estimated at around USD 13 billion

·Statoil intends to continue to mature the large portfolio of exploration assets and estimates a total exploration activity level of around USD 2 billion for 2016, excluding signature bonuses

·Statoil aims to deliver efficiency improvements with pre-tax cash flow effects of around USD 2.5 billion annually from 2016

·Statoil’s ambition is to keep the unit of production cost in the top quartile of Statoil`s peer group

·For the period 2014 – 2017, organic production growth [7] is expected to come from new projects resulting in around 1% CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) from a 2014 level rebased for divestments

·The equity production for 2016 is estimated to be somewhat lower than the 2015 level [7]

·Scheduled maintenanceactivity is estimated to reduce quarterly production by approximately 25 mboe per day in the first quarter of 2016 of which the majority is liquids internationally. In total, the maintenance is estimated to reduce equity production by around 60 mboe per day for the full fiscal year 2016, which is higher than the 2015 impact

·Indicative effects from Production Sharing Agreement (PSA-effect) and US royalties are estimated to be around 135 mboe per day in 2016 based on an oil price of USD 40 per barrel and 165 mboe per day based on an oil price of USD 70 per barrel [4]

·Deferral of production to create future value, gas off-take, timing of new capacity coming on stream, and operational regularity, activity level, development in the prices of goods, raw materials and services that are used in the development and operation of oil and gas producing assets, contractor performance, as well as uncertainty around the closing of the announced transactions represent the most significant risks related to the production guidance

·The board of directors proposes to the annual general meeting (AGM) maintaining a dividend of USD 0.2201 per share for the fourth quarter 2015 and to introduce a two-year scrip dividend programme for  eligible shareholders starting from the fourth quarter 2015

·With effect from first quarter of 2016, Statoil will change to USD as presentation currency

These forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and are, by their nature, subject to significant risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future.foregoing guidance. For further information, see section 105.7 Forward-Looking StatementsStatements.

 


12[4] Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015See section 5.2 for non-GAAP measures


 

3Business overview2.2 BUSINESS OVERVIEW

 

3.1 Our historyHistory

O

n 18 September 1972, Statoil was formed in 1972 by a decision of the Norwegian parliament and listed on the stock exchanges in Oslo and New York in 2001.

Statoil was incorporated as a limited liability company under the name Den norske stats oljeselskap AS on 18 September 1972. AsAS. Being a company wholly owned 100% by the Norwegian State, Statoil's initial role was to be the government's commercial instrument in the development of the oil and gas industry in Norway.

In 2001, the company became a public limited company listed on the Oslo and New York stock exchanges, and it changed its name to Statoil ASA.

Statoil has grown Growing in parallel with the Norwegian oil and gas industry, which dates back to the late 1960s. Initially, Statoil’s operations werehave primarily been focused on exploration, development and production of oil and gas on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS), as a partner..

 

InDuring the 1970s,1980s, Statoil commenced its own operations, made important discoveries and began oil refining operations, which have been of great importance togrew substantially through the further development of the NCS.

Statoil grew substantially in the 1980s through the development of large fields on the NCS (Statfjord, Gullfaks, Oseberg, Troll and others). Statoil also became a major player in the European gas market by securingentering into large sales contracts for the development and operation of gas transport systems and terminals. During the same decade, Statoil was involved in manufacturing and marketing in Scandinavia and established a comprehensive network of service stations. This line of business was fully divested in 2012.

 

In 2001, Statoil was listed on the Oslo and New York stock exchanges and became a public limited company under the name Statoil ASA, 67% majority owned by the Norwegian State. Since 2000, our business has grown as a result ofthen, substantial investments both on the NCS and internationally. Our ability to fully realise the potential of the

NCS was strengthened through theinternationally, have grown our business. The merger with Hydro's oil and gas division on 1 October 2007.

In recent years, Statoil has utilised their2007 further strengthened Statoil’s ability to fully realise the potential of the NCS. Enhanced utilisation of expertise to design and manage operations in various environments in order to growhave expanded our upstream activities outside our traditional area of offshore production. This includes the development of heavy oil and shale gas projects.

In 2010, Statoil carried out an initial public offering of Statoil Fuel & Retail ASA on the Oslo Børs, partially divesting projects and reducing our interest in the business relating to service stations. In 2012, all of the remaining shares in Statoil Fuel & Retail ASA were divested.

Statoil also participates in projects that focus on other forms of energy, such asespecially on offshore wind, but also on solar and carbon capture and storage, in anticipationstorage.

The board of directors of Statoil have proposed to change the name of the needcompany to expandEquinor. The new name supports the company’s strategy and development as a broad energy production, strengthen energy security and combat adverse climate change.company.  The suggested name change will be proposed to the shareholders in a resolution to the annual general meeting on 15 May 2018.

 

3.2 Our businessActivities

Statoil is a technology-drivenan international energy company primarily engaged in oil and gas exploration and production activities.

Statoil ASA is a public limited liability companyactivities, organised under the laws of Norway and subject to the provisions of the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act. The Norwegian State is the largest shareholder in Statoil ASA, with a direct ownership interest of 67%.

Statoil's head office is located in Stavanger, Norway. Statoil has business operations in more than 30 countries and employs about 21,600 employees worldwide.

Statoil isIn addition to being the leading operator on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) andNCS, Statoil has also has substantial international activities. Statoilactivities and is present in several of the most important oil and gas provinces in the world. In 2015, 37% of Statoil's equity production came from internationalOur activities span operations in more than 30 countries and the company also holds operatorships internationally.employs 20,245 employees worldwide.

 

Our access to crude oil in the form of equity, governmental and third partythird-party volumes makes Statoil a large netseller of crude oil, seller, and Statoil is the second-largest supplier of natural gas to the European market. Processing, and refining, are also part of our operations. Statoil is also participating in projects that focus on other forms of energy, such as offshore wind and carbon capture and storage in anticipationis also part of the need to expand energy production, strengthen energy security and combat adverse climate change.our operations.

 

Statoil's business addressStatoil’s registered office is at Forusbeen 50, N-40354035 Stavanger, Norway. ItsNorway and the telephone number of its registered office is +47 51 99 00 00.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201513


3.3 Our competitive position

There is intense competition in the oil and gas industry for customers, production licences, operatorships, capital and experienced human resources.

Statoil competes with large integrated oil and gas companies, as well as with independent and state-owned companies, for the acquisition of assets and licences for the exploration, development and production of oil and gas, and for the refining, marketing and trading of crude oil, natural gas and related products. Key factors affecting competition in the oil and gas industry are oil and gas supply and demand, exploration and production costs, global production levels, alternative fuels, and environmental and governmental regulations. In addition,When acquiring assets and licences for exploration, development and production and in refining, marketing and trading of crude oil, natural gas and related products, Statoil competes to develop wind energy opportunities.with other integrated oil and gas companies.

 

Statoil's ability to remain competitive will depend, among other things, on the company's management continuing tocontinuous focus on reducing unit costs and improving efficiency, and maintainingefficiency. It will also depend on technological innovation to maintain long-term growth in reserves and production, through continuing technological innovation. It will also depend on ourthe ability to seize international opportunities in new areas where our competitors may also be actively pursuing exploration and development opportunities. Statoil believes it is in a position to compete effectively in each of our business segments.utilise new opportunities for digitalisation.

 

The information about Statoil's competitive position in the business overview and strategy, and operational review sections,strategic report is based on a number of sources. They includesources; e.g. investment analyst reports, independent market studies, and our internal assessments of our market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market players.

 

Continuous improvements

Statoil has endeavoured to be accurate in our presentation of information basedfocus on other sources, but has not independently verified such information.

Improvement programmes

Statoil’s ambition to further reduce cost and improvecontinuously efficiency was presented at the capital markets update (CMU) on 6 February 2015, targeting annual savings of USD 1.7 billion from 2016. At the CMU on 4 February 2016, Statoil announced that it will step up its efficiency programme by 50% withimprovements as a goal to realise USD 2.5 billion in annual savings from 2016.

Improvement programmes are Statoil’s response to the industrial challenge that has emerged over the recent years characterised by reducing prices for our products escalating cost and declining returns. More specifically, the ambition is to realise positive

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201715


production effects and capexcapital expenditures and operating costcosts savings to improve financial results and cash-flows. In 2017, Statoil realised efficiency improvements of USD 1.3 billion on top of the already achieved USD 3.2 billon since 2013.

 

3.4 Corporate structure

Establishment of Digital Centre of Excellence

In 2017 Statoil accelerated the digitalisation efforts by establishing a Digital Centre of Excellence and launching a digital road map. The goal is to significantly increase our utilisation of data, sophisticated analytics and robotics. In addition, Statoil aims to improve safety, reduce our carbon footprint and increase profitability. Statoil see potential by utilising data across IT applications and organisational boundaries. Combining data and learning across Statoil’s disciplines could provide a better basis for decision-making, new business opportunities, and increased collaboration externally with our partners, suppliers and other lines of business.

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

Business areas

Statoil's operations are managed through the following eight business areas:

 

Development and & Production Norway (DPN)

DPN comprises ourmanages Statoil’s upstream activities on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). DPN aimsNCS and explores for and extracts crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. The business area’s ambition is to continue itsStatoil’s leading roleposition on the NCS and ensure maximum value creation on the NCS. Through excellentthrough continuously improved HSE and improved operational performance and cost, DPN strives to maintain and strengthen Statoil's position as a world- leading operator of producing offshore fields. DPN seeks to open new acreage and to mature improved oil recovery and exploration prospects. New and existing fields are primarily developed using an industrial approach, in which speed of delivery and cost improvements through standardisation and repeated use of proved solutions are key elements.performance.

 

Development and& Production International (DPI)

DPI comprises ourmanages Statoil’s worldwide upstream activities that are not included inexcluding the DPN and Development and& Production USA (DPUSA) business areas. It explores for and extracts crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. DPI's ambition is to build a large and profitable international production portfolio comprising activities ranging from accessing new opportunities to delivering on existing projects and managing a production portfolio. DPI endeavours to ensure the delivery of profitable projects in a range of complex technical and stakeholder environments, and it manages a broad non-operated production portfolio that will be complemented with operated positions.environments.

 

Development and& Production United StatesUSA (DPUSA)

DPUSA comprises ourmanages Statoil’s upstream activities in the USA and Mexico. DPUSA's ambition is to develop a material and profitable position in the US and Mexico, including the deep waterdeep-water regions of the Gulf of Mexico and unconventional oil and gas in the US. In this connection, Statoil aims to further strengthen its capabilities in deep water and unconventional oil and gas operations.

 

Marketing, Midstream and& Processing (MMP)

MMP comprises ourmanages Statoil’s marketing and trading ofactivities related to oil products and natural gas, transportation, processing and manufacturing, and the development of oil and gas value chains. MMP's ambition isgas. MMP seeks to maximise value creation in Statoil's midstream marketing and renewable energymarketing business.

 

Technology, Projects and& Drilling (TPD)

14Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


TPD's ambitionTPD is responsible for the global project portfolio, well delivery, new technologies and sourcing across Statoil. TPD seeks to provide safe and secure, efficient and cost-competitive global well and project delivery, technological excellence, and research and development. Cost-competitive procurement is an important contributory factor although group-wide procurement services are also expected to help to drive costs in the group down. for maximising value for Statoil.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201515


Exploration (EXP)

EXP's ambition is to positionEXP manages Statoil’s worldwide exploration activities with the aim of positioning Statoil as one of the leading global exploration companies. This is achieved through accessing high potential new acreage in priority basins, globally prioritising and drilling more significant wells in growth and frontier basins, delivering near-field exploration on the NCS and other select areas, and achieving step-change improvements in performance.

 

New Energy Solutions (NES)

NES reflects Statoil’s aspirationslong-term goal to gradually complement itsour oil and gas portfolio with profitable renewable energy and other low-carbon energy solutions. NES is responsible for wind parks,farms and carbon capture and storage as well as other renewable energy and low-carbon energy solutions.

 

Global Strategy and& Business Development (GSB)

GSB setsdevelops the corporate strategy and manages business development and merger and acquisition (M&A) activities for Statoil. The ambition of the GSB business area is to closely link corporate strategy, business development and M&Amerger and acquisition activities to actively drive Statoil's corporate development.

Reporting segments

With effect as of the third quarter 2017, segment names have been changed for the reporting segments DPN and DPI. New names are Exploration & Production Norway (E&P Norway) and Exploration & Production International (E&P International), respectively. There are no changes to other reporting segments, and business area’s names remain unchanged.

16Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil reports its business in the following reporting segments: Development and

·E&P Norway reporting segment – Exploration & Production Norway (DPN); Development and– the DPN business area

·E&P International reporting segment – Exploration & Production International,

(DPI), which combines the DPI and the DPUSA business areas;areas

·MMP reporting segment - Marketing, Midstream and& Processing (MMP); and Other.– the MMP business area

The ·Other reporting segment– which includes activities in New Energy Solutions (NES), Technology, Projects and Drilling (TPD), Global Strategy and Business Development (GSB)NES, TPD, GSB and Corporate staffs and support functions. functions

Activities relating to the Exploration (EXP)EXP business area are fully allocated to - and presented in - the respective developmentrelevant exploration and production reporting segment. Activities relating to the TPD and GSB business areas are partly allocated to - and presented in - the relevant exploration and production reporting segments.

Presentation

In the following sections in the report, the operations of eachare reported according to the reporting segment are presented.segment. Underlying activities or business clusters are presented according to how the reporting segment organises its operations. The Exploration business area's activities, which include group discoveries andSee note 3 Segments to the appraisal of new exploration resources, are presented as part of the various development and production reporting segments (Development and Production Norway, and Development and Production International).Consolidated financial statements for further details.

 

As required by the SEC, Statoil prepares its disclosures about oil and gas reserves and certain other supplementary oil and gas disclosures based on geographicalgeographic areas. TheStatoil’s geographical areas are defined by country and continent. Theycontinent and consist of Norway, Eurasia excluding Norway, Africa, US and Americas excluding US.

SEGMENT REPORTING

Internal transactions in oil and gas volumes occur between our reporting segments before being sold in the market. The pricing policy for internal transfers is based on estimated market prices. For further information, see section 2.8 Operational performance under Production volumes and prices.

We eliminate intercompany sales when combining the results of reporting segments. Intercompany sales include transactions recorded in connection with our oil and natural gas production in the E&P Norway and the Americas.E&P International reporting segments, and also in connection with the sale, transportation or refining of our oil and natural gas production in the MMP reporting segment. Certain types of transportation costs are reported in both the MMP and the DPUSA business areas.

 

The DPN business area produces oil and natural gas which is sold internally to the MMP business area. A large share of the oil produced by the DPI and DPUSA business areas is also sold through the MMP business area. The remaining oil and gas from the DPI and the DPUSA business areas is sold directly in the market. For intercompany sales and purchases, Statoil has established a market-based transfer pricing methodology for the oil and natural gas that meets the requirements for applicable laws and regulations.

In 2017, the average transfer price for natural gas was USD 4.33 per mmbtu. The average transfer price was USD 3.42 per mmbtu in 2016 and USD 5.17 in 2015. For oil sold from DPN to MMP, the transfer price is the applicable market-reflective price minus a cost recovery rate.

SeeThe following table shows certain financial information for the four reporting segments, including intercompany eliminations for each of the years in the three-year period ending 31 December 2017. For additional information, see note 3 Segmentsin to the Consolidated financial statementstatements.for more details.

16Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


3.5 Development and Production Norway (DPN)

3.5.1 DPN overview

Development and Production Norway (DPN) is responsible for field development and operational activities on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS).


Statoil's equity and entitlement production on the NCS was 1,232 mboe per day in 2015. That was about 68% of Statoil's total entitlement production and 62.5% of Statoil's equity production.

 

 

DPN has organised the production operations into four business clusters: Operations North (Barents Sea) located in Harstad, Operations Mid-Norway (Norwegian Sea) located in Stjørdal near Trondheim, Operations West (North Sea) located in Bergen and Operation South (North Sea) located in Stavanger. Partner-operated fields cover the entire NCS and are internally included in the Operations South business cluster.

When possible, the fields in each cluster use common infrastructure, such as production installations and oil and gas transport facilities. This reduces the investments required to develop new fields. DPN’s efforts in these core areas also focus on finding and developing smaller fields through the use of existing infrastructure and on increasing production by improving the recovery factor.

DPN is also working to extend production from our existing fields through improved reservoir management and the application of new technology.

Segment performance

  For the year ended 31 December

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration & Production Norway

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

17,692

13,077

17,339

Net operating income/(loss)

10,485

4,451

7,161

Non-current segment assets1)

30,278

27,816

27,706

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration & Production International

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

9,256

6,657

8,200

Net operating income/(loss)

1,341

(4,352)

(8,729)

Non-current segment assets1)

36,453

36,181

37,475

 

 

 

 

 

Marketing, Midstream & Processing

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

59,071

44,979

58,106

Net operating income/(loss)

2,243

623

2,931

Non-current segment assets1)

5,137

4,450

5,588

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

87

39

354

Net operating income/(loss)

(239)

(423)

(129)

Non-current segment assets1)

390

352

690

 

 

 

 

 

Eliminations 2)

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

(24,919)

(18,880)

(24,357)

Net operating income/(loss)

(59)

(219)

133

Non-current segment assets1)

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil group

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

61,187

45,873

59,642

Net operating income/(loss)

13,771

80

1,366

Non-current segment assets1)

72,258

68,799

71,458

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Deferred tax assets, pension assets and non-current financial assets are not allocated to segments.

2)

Includes elimination of inter-segment sales and related unrealised profits, mainly from the sale of crude oil and products.

Inter-segment revenues are based upon estimated market prices.

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    17


 

Key events and portfolio developments in 2015:

·In January 2015, Statoil announced the start-up of production at the Valemon oil and gas field in the North Sea

·Statoil announced production start up on fast track projects at the Oseberg Delta in February, Gullfaks Sør Olje in July and Smørbukk Sør Extension in September

·In November the start up of production at the Edvard Grieg field was announced by Lundin

·The major redevelopment projects Åsgard Subsea compression and two new compressors on the Troll A platform have started up

·A total of seven turnarounds were planned to be performed during 2015. Four turnarounds were carried out, and three turnarounds were deferred from 2015 to 2016 to coordinate with other activities due to reduce production losses and reduce costs

·Plan for Development and Operations (PDO) for the Johan Sverdrup field and Gullfaks Rimfaksdalen Fast track project were approved by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (MPE) and the PDO for Oseberg Vestflanken 2 was submitted to the MPE

·An extensive exploration drilling program in 2015 resulted in 21 completed wells, of which 10 were discoveries. A total of 16 wells were Statoil operated

·Statoil has delivered an extensive application for the 23rd concession round and has been awarded interest in 24 licenses on the NCS in the Awards in Predefined Areas (APA) 2015, 13 of those as operator and 11 as partner

·In December Statoil announced that it farmed down to Repsol a 15% interest in the Gudrun field. Statoil remains as operator and largest equity holder with a 36% interest

The profitability of our industry continues to be challenged. Statoil’s response to the industrial challenge characterised by high costs and declining returns is addressed in the section 2 Strategy and market overview.

3.5.2 Fields in production on the NCS

Statoil’s entitlement production at NCS was about 68% of Statoil’s total entitlement production in 2015.

The following table shows DPN's average daily entitlement production of oil, including NGL and condensates, and natural gas for the years ending 31 December 2015, 2014 and 2013. Field areas are groups of fields operated as a single entity.

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

Area production

mbbl

mmcm

mboe/day

 

mbbl

mmcm

mboe/day

 

mbbl

mmcm

mboe/day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations North

 32  

 7  

 78  

 

 36  

 7  

 80  

 

 24  

 5  

 56  

Operations Mid

 113  

 17  

 218  

 

 126  

 17  

 235  

 

 126  

 15  

 222  

Operations West

 267  

 51  

 591  

 

 264  

 43  

 535  

 

 290  

 48  

 589  

Operations South

 134  

 13  

 214  

 

 107  

 11  

 177  

 

 94  

 12  

 167  

Partner Operated Fields

 50  

 13  

 132  

 

 55  

 16  

 157  

 

 58  

 20  

 182  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 595  

 101  

 1,232  

 

 588  

 95  

 1,184  

 

 591  

 99  

 1,217  

18   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

The following table shows the NCS productiontables show total revenues by fields and field areas in which Statoil was participating as of 31 December 2015.country.

 

Business cluster

Geographical area

Statoil's equity interest in %

Operator 

On stream 

Licence expiry date

 

Average daily production in 2015 mboe/day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations North

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

Snøhvit

The Barents Sea

36.79

Statoil

2007

2035

 

47.1

Norne

The Norwegian Sea

39.10

Statoil

1997

2026

 

5.9

Alve

The Norwegian Sea

85.00

Statoil

2009

2029

 

10.6

Urd

The Norwegian Sea

63.95

Statoil

2005

2026

 

14.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operations North

 

 

 

  

  

 

77.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations Mid-Norway

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

Åsgard 

The Norwegian Sea

34.57

Statoil

1999

2027

 

92.1

Morvin

The Norwegian Sea

64.00

Statoil

2010

2027

 

16.3

Mikkel 

The Norwegian Sea

43.97

Statoil

2003

2020

1)

14.3

Tyrihans

The Norwegian Sea

58.84

Statoil

2009

2029

 

49.6

Kristin

The Norwegian Sea

55.30

Statoil

2005

2033

2)

24.5

Heidrun 

The Norwegian Sea

13.04

Statoil

1995

2024

3)

8.7

Njord

The Norwegian Sea

20.00

Statoil

1997

2021

4)

6.1

Hyme

The Norwegian Sea

35.00

Statoil

2013

2014

5)

6.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operations Mid-Norway

 

 

 

 

 

 

217.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations West

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Troll Phase 1 (Gas)

The North Sea

30.58

Statoil

1996

2030

 

185.2

Troll Phase 2 (Oil)

The North Sea

30.58

Statoil

1995

2030

 

38.2

Fram 

The North Sea

45.00

Statoil

2003

2024

 

16.9

Fram H Nord

The North Sea

49.20

Statoil

2014

2024

 

2.3

Oseberg

The North Sea

49.30

Statoil

1988

2031

 

86.4

Tune

The North Sea

50.00

Statoil

2002

2032

6)

1.9

Gullfaks 

The North Sea

51.00

Statoil

1986

2036

 

69.4

Gimle 

The North Sea

65.13

Statoil

2006

2034

7)

2.6

Kvitebjørn

The North Sea

39.55

Statoil

2004

2031

 

64.0

Valemon

The North Sea

57.76

Statoil

2015

2031

 

16.4

Visund 

The North Sea

53.20

Statoil

1999

2034

 

48.5

Grane

The North Sea

36.66

Statoil

2003

2030

 

45.8

Volve

The North Sea

59.60

Statoil

2008

2028

 

10.0

Veslefrikk 

The North Sea

18.00

Statoil

1989

2020

8)

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operation West

 

 

 

 

 

 

590.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operations South

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

Sleipner Vest

The North Sea

58.35

Statoil

1996

2028

 

49.2

Sleipner Øst

The North Sea

59.60

Statoil

1993

2028

 

44.4

Gungne 

The North Sea

62.00

Statoil

1996

2028

 

10.0

Gudrun

The North Sea

36.00

Statoil

2014

2028

9)

6.1

Statfjord Unit

The North Sea

44.34

Statoil

1979

2026

 

42.6

Statfjord Øst

The North Sea

31.69

Statoil

1994

2026

10)

1.3

Statfjord Nord

The North Sea

21.88

Statoil

1995

2026

 

1.2

Sygna 

The North Sea

30.71

Statoil

2000

2026

10)

0.8

Snorre 

The North Sea

33.28

Statoil

1992

2015

11)

35.6

Vigdis area 

The North Sea

41.50

Statoil

1997

2024

 

14.6

Tordis area 

The North Sea

41.50

Statoil

1994

2024

 

8.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operations South

 

 

 

 

 

 

214.0

2017 Total revenues and other income by country

Crude oil

Natural gas

Natural gal liquids

Refined

products

Other

Total sales

(in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

23,087

9,741

4,948

6,463

1,026

45,264

USA

5,726

1,237

668

1,497

1,237

10,365

Sweden

0

0

0

1,268

10

1,277

Denmark

0

0

0

2,195

12

2,208

Other

706

442

31

0

705

1,884

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (excluding net income (loss)

from equity accounted investments and other income

29,519

11,420

5,647

11,423

2,991

60,999



2016 Total revenues and other income by country

Crude oil

Natural gas

Natural gas liquids

Refined

products

Other

Total sales

(in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

20,544

7,973

3,580

4,135

(497)

35,735

US

3,073

957

455

1,110

867

6,463

Sweden

0

0

0

1,379

(53)

1,326

Denmark

0

0

0

1,518

14

1,532

Other

690

272

1

0

(26)

936

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (excluding net income (loss)

from equity accounted investments and other income

24,307

9,202

4,036

8,142

305

45,993



2015 Total revenues and other income by country

Crude oil

Natural gas

Natural gas liquids

Refined

products

Other

Total sales

(in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

22,741

10,811

4,932

5,644

1,454

45,582

US

3,718

1,133

532

1,605

933

7,922

Sweden

0

0

0

1,762

115

1,877

Denmark

0

0

0

1,750

8

1,759

Other

1,347

446

17

0

722

2,532

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (excluding net income (loss)

from equity accounted investments and other income

27,806

12,390

5,482

10,761

3,232

59,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Statoil is a technology-intensive company and research and development is an integral part of our strategy. Our technology strategy is about prioritising technology for value creation that enables us to achieve growth and access, and sets the direction for technology development and implementation for the future. Our focus is on low cost, low carbon solutions and re-using standardised technologies.

We continuously research, develop and deploy innovative technologies to create opportunities and enhance the value of Statoil’s current and future assets. Statoil’s technology development activities aim to reduce field development, drilling and operating costs, and CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions. We utilise a range of tools for the development of new technologies:

·In-house research and development

·Cooperation with academia and research institutes

·Collaborative development projects with our major suppliers

·Project related development as part of our field development activities

·Direct investment in technology start-up companies through our Statoil Technology Invest venture activities

·Invitation to open innovation challenges as part of Statoil Innovate

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    19


 

Research and development expenditures were USD 307 million in 2017, USD 298 million in 2016 and USD 344 million in 2015,

Business cluster

Geographical area

Statoil's equity interest in %1)

Operator 

On stream 

Licence expiry date

 

Average daily production in 2015 mboe/day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partner Operated Fields

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ormen Lange

The Norwegian Sea

25.35

Shell

2007

2041

12)

47.8

Skarv

The Norwegian Sea

36.17

BP Norge AS

2013

2033

13)

46.8

Ekofisk area 

The North Sea

7.60

ConocoPhillips

1971

2028

 

14.3

Marulk

The North Sea

50.00

Eni Norge AS

2012

2025

 

13.2

Vilje

The North Sea

28.85

Marathon Oil

2008

2021

 

4.0

Sigyn 

The North Sea

60.00

ExxonMobil

2002

2022

 

3.8

Ringhorne Øst

The North Sea

14.82

ExxonMobil

2006

2030

 

1.7

Edvard Grieg

The North Sea

15.00

Lundin Norway AS

2015

2035

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Partner Operated Fields

 

 

 

 

 

 

131.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,232.0

1)   PL092 expires in 2020 and PL121 expires in 2022.

2)   PL134B expires in 2027 and PL199 expires in 2033.

3)   PL095 expires in 2024 and PL124 expires in 2025.

4)  PL107 expires in 2021 and PL132 expires in 2023.

5)   PL348 expires in 2029.

6)   PL034 expires in 2020. PL053 expires in 2031 and PL190 in 2032.

7)   PL120B expires in 2034 and PL050DS expires in 2023.

8)   PL052 expires in 2020 and PL053 in 2031.

9)  The 2015 Statoil farm down transaction with Repsol completed 31 December 2015 (From ownership 51% to 36% at Gudrun field)

10)  PL037 expires in 2026 and PL089 expires in 2024.

11)  PL089 expires in 2024 and PL057 expires in 2016.

12)  PL209/250 expires in 2041 and PL208 expires in 2040.

13)  PL212/262 expires in 2033 and PL159 expires in 2029.

The following sections provide information about the main producing assets. See section 4.1.4 DPN profitand loss analysis for a discussion of results of operations for 2015, 2014 and 2013.


20   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

3.5.2.1 Operations North2.3 E&P Norway
– exploration & production NORWAY

 

The main producing fields in the Operations North area are Snøhvit and Norne.

OVERVIEW

The Norwegian Sea regionExploration & Production Norway (E&P Norway) reporting segment is characterised by petroleum reserves located at water depths between 340responsible for exploration, field development and 380 metres. Inoperations on the Barents Sea the petroleum reserves are located at water depths between 310 and 340 meters. The Gulf Stream keeps the sea free of ice all year round, but winter storms can make surface installations difficult to operate.

Snøhvit was the first field developed in the Barents Sea. It is one of the first major developments using onshore production facilities. All offshore installations are subsea. The natural gas is transported to shore and then processed at our Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plant on Melkøya. The LNG are shipped to customers in Europe, Asia, North and South America in tankers. The CO2 in the feed-gas from Snøhvit and Albatross is removed due to freezing constraints in the process system. To reduce carbon dioxide emissions to the air the removed CO2 is liquefied, transported through a pipeline, and then injected into a storage reservoir in Snøhvit. The LNG plant has produced according to plan in 2015, with high production efficiency, improved HSE results and enhanced cost efficiency. As of 1 January 2016 responsibility for operation of Snøhvit onshore facilities is transferred from DPN to MMP.

Norne is an oil field in the Norwegian Sea. The field has been developed using a floating production, storage and offloading vessel (FPSO) connected to subsea templates. Alve, Marulk, Urd and Skuld are tie-in fields connected to the Norne FPSO.

3.5.2.2 Operations Mid-Norway

The main producing fields in the Operations Mid-Norway area are Åsgard, Kristin, Tyrihans and Heidrun.

Operation Mid-Norway operates in a mature part of the Norwegian Sea, and is a significant contributor to Statoil’s equity production. Main focus is to capitalise existing fields through profitable realisation of increased oil recovery and successful implementation of new developments. There is still exploration potential in the area and a targeted exploration effort is in execution.

The Åsgard fieldNCS which includes the Åsgard A production and storage ship for oil, the Åsgard B semi-submersible floating production platform for gas, and the Åsgard C storage vessel for condensate. In September 2015 Statoil started the world first subsea gas compressor on Åsgard. The compressor increases the Åsgard recovery rate from 67% to 87% thereby extending the reservoirs’ productive lives. Mikkel and Morvin are tie ins to Åsgard.

Tyrihans is a subsea field with five templates. The well stream of oil and gas is tied back to Kristin for processing. Tyrihans receives seawater injection from Kristin and gas injection from Åsgard B.

Kristin is a gas and condensate field. The Kristin development is the first high-temperature/high-pressure (HTHP) field developed with subsea installations. The pressure and temperature in the reservoir are among the highest of all developed fields on the NCS.

Heidrun is developed with a floating concrete tension leg platform. The oil is transferred to the floating storage unit, Heidrun B, operated from June 2015. 

The Njord field is located inNorth Sea, the Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea. E&P Norway aims to ensure safe and efficient operations and to maximise the value potential from the NCS. For proved reserves development see Development of reserves in Proved oil and gas reserves in section 2.8 Operational performance.

For 2017, E&P Norway reports NCS production from 38 Statoil operated fields, 10 partner operated fields, and equity accounted production from Lundin Petroleum AB.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201721


Key events and portfolio developments in 2017:

·In March, the decision was made to proceed with the Johan Sverdrup phase 2 development, awarding FEED contracts. Investment decision and submission of Plan for Development and Operation is expected in the second half of 2018

·On 26 March, the Flyndre field has been developedcame on stream with a floating steel platform unit,Maersk Oil UK Ltd as operator

·On 27 March, Statoil submitted the revised Plan for Development and Operation for the Njord A, with both drillingfield, and processing facilities.Plan for Development and Operation for the Bauge field. Both submitted plans were subsequently approved on 20 June 2017

·On 15 April, the Norwegian authorities approved the Plan for Development and Operation of the Trestakk discovery on the Halten Bank in the Norwegian Sea

·On 30 June, the Gina Krog field went on stream

·On 1 July, Statoil assumed operatorship of the Sigyn field in the North Sea

·In July, Statoil and partners decided to develop the Snefrid Nord gas discovery. The subsea field Hyme iswill be tied back to Njord A.Aasta Hansteen

As a result·On 28 July, the Byrding field came on stream

·In September, Statoil achieved NCS climate target two years ahead of structural integrity issues Njord A was temporarily shut downschedule

·In October, Barents drilling campaign concludes with the Kayak find of commercial size

·In November, opening of the Valemon control room, the first platform in Statoil’s portfolio remotely-controlled from land

·On 27 November, Statoil announced the decision to buy Total’s equity stakes and extensive reinforcement work was completed through a long turnaround periodto assume the operatorships of the Martin Linge field and the Garantiana discovery. The transactions are expected to be finalised in late March 2018

·On 5 December, Statoil submitted the Plan for Development and Operation for the Johan Castberg field in the Barents Sea

·In December, Cat J rigs Askeladden and Askepott preparing arrival at the Gullfaks and Oseberg fields. Drilling is expected to start in early 2018

·On 21 December, Statoil submitted the Plan for Development and Operation of the Snorre Expansion project, increasing the recovery from Sept 2013the Snorre field by close to July 2014. Since July 2014 conditional monitoring and precautionary evacuation200 million barrels

Fields in forecasted bad weather conditions have been applied. In addition there is no drilling activity. production on the NCS

The Project “Njord Future” is established to secure long termtable below shows E&P Norway's average daily entitlement production for both the Njordyears ending 31 December 2017, 2016 and Hyme2015. Production in 2017 increased due to higher flex gas off-take, contributions from new fields and to act as a tie-in host candidate for discoveries in the area.fewer turnarounds.

 

3.5.2.3 Operations West

Average daily entitlement production

  For the year ended 31 December

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

Area production

mbbl/day

mmcm/day

mboe/day

 

mbbl/day

mmcm/day

mboe/day

 

mbbl/day

mmcm/day

mboe/day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil operated fields

 505  

 100  

 1,136  

 

 511  

 86  

 1,049  

 

 545  

 88  

 1,100  

Partner operated fields

 70  

 17  

 179  

 

 70  

 17  

 177  

 

 50  

 13  

 132  

Equity accounted production

 19  

 -    

 19  

 

 8  

 -    

 8  

 

 -    

 -    

 -    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 594  

 118  

 1,334  

 

 589  

 103  

 1,235  

 

 595  

 101  

 1,232  

22Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


The mainfollowing tables show the NCS entitlement production by fields in which Statoil was participating during the year ended 31 December 2017.

Average daily entitlement production

Geographical area

Statoil's equity interest in %

 

On stream 

Licence expiry date

 

Average production in 2017 mboe/day

 

 

Field

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil operated fields

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

Troll Phase 1 (Gas)

The North Sea

30.58

 

1996

2030

 

200

Oseberg

The North Sea

49.30

 

1988

2031

 

101

Gullfaks 

The North Sea

51.00

 

1986

2036

 

96

Åsgard 

The Norwegian Sea

34.57

 

1999

2027

 

93

Visund 

The North Sea

53.20

 

1999

2034

 

67

Kvitebjørn

The North Sea

39.55

 

2004

2031

 

54

Tyrihans

The Norwegian Sea

58.84

 

2009

2029

 

54

Grane

The North Sea

36.61

 

2003

2030

 

47

Snøhvit

The Barents Sea

36.79

 

2007

2035

 

44

Troll Phase 2 (Oil)

The North Sea

30.58

 

1995

2030

 

39

Sleipner Vest

The North Sea

58.35

 

1996

2028

 

39

Statfjord Unit

The North Sea

44.34

 

1979

2026

 

38

Gudrun

The North Sea

36.00

 

2014

2028

 

35

Snorre 

The North Sea

33.28

 

1992

2018

1)

28

Valemon

The North Sea

53.78

 

2015

2031

 

26

Mikkel 

The Norwegian Sea

43.97

 

2003

2024

 

21

Fram 

The North Sea

45.00

 

2003

2024

 

20

Kristin

The Norwegian Sea

55.30

 

2005

2033

2)

19

Alve

The Norwegian Sea

85.00

 

2009

2029

 

17

Gina Krog

The North Sea

58.70

 

2017

2032

 

15

Urd

The Norwegian Sea

63.95

 

2005

2026

 

12

Heidrun 

The Norwegian Sea

13.04

 

1995

2024

3)

11

Vigdis area 

The North Sea

41.50

 

1997

2024

 

10

Sleipner Øst

The North Sea

59.60

 

1993

2028

 

9

Tordis area 

The North Sea

41.50

 

1994

2024

 

9

Morvin

The Norwegian Sea

64.00

 

2010

2027

 

8

Sigyn

The North Sea

60.00

 

2002

2022

4)

6

Norne

The Norwegian Sea

39.10

 

1997

2026

 

5

Gungne 

The North Sea

62.00

 

1996

2028

 

4

Statfjord Nord

The North Sea

21.88

 

1995

2026

 

2

Heimdal

The North Sea

29.44

 

1985

2021

 

2

Veslefrikk 

The North Sea

18.00

 

1989

2020

5)

2

Byrding

The North Sea

70.00

 

2017

2024

 

2

Statfjord Øst

The North Sea

31.69

 

1994

2026

6)

1

Sygna 

The North Sea

30.71

 

2000

2026

7)

1

Fram H Nord

The North Sea

49.20

 

2014

2024

8)

0

Gimle 

The North Sea

65.13

 

2006

2034

9)

0

Sindre

The North Sea

52.34

 

2017

2023

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Statoil operated fields

 

 

 

 

1,136

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201723


Average daily entitlement production

Geographical area

Statoil's equity interest in %

Operator 

On stream 

Licence expiry date

 

Average production in 2017 mboe/day

 

 

Field

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partner operated fields

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ormen Lange

The Norwegian Sea

25.35

A/S Norske Shell

2007

2041

10)

74

Skarv

The Norwegian Sea

36.16

Aker BP ASA

2013

2033

11)

39

Ivar Aasen

The North Sea

41.47

Aker BP ASA

2016

2029

12)

21

Goliat

The Barents Sea

35.00

Eni Norge AS

2016

2042

 

15

Ekofisk area 

The North Sea

7.60

ConocoPhillips Skandinavia AS

1971

2028

 

14

Marulk

The Norwegian Sea

50.00

Eni Norge AS

2012

2025

 

10

Vilje

The North Sea

28.85

Aker BP ASA

2008

2021

 

3

Ringhorne Øst

The North Sea

14.82

Point Resources AS

2006

2030

 

1

Enoch

The North Sea

11.78

Repsol Sinopec UK Ltd.

2007

2024

 

0

Flyndre

The North Sea

0.47

Maersk Oil UK Ltd.

2017

2028

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total partner operated fields

 

 

 

 

179

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lundin Petroleum AB

 

20.10

Lundin Petroleum AB

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total E&P Norway including share of equity accounted production

 

 

1,334

1)  PL089 expires in 2024 and PL057 expires in 2018.

2)  PL134D expires in 2027 and PL199 expires in 2033.

3)  PL095 expires in 2024 and PL124 expires in 2025.

4)  Transfer of operatorship from ExxonMobil to Statoil on 1 July 2017.

5)  PL052 expires in 2020 and PL053 in 2031.

6)  PL037 expires in 2026 and PL089 expires in 2024.

7)  PL037 expires in 2026 and PL089 expires in 2024.

8)  PL090G expires in 2024 and PL248E expires in 2035.

9)  PL120B expires in 2034 and PL050DS expires in 2023.

10)  PL209/250 expires in 2041 and PL208 expires in 2040.

11)  PL212/262 expires in 2033 and PL159 expires in 2029.

12)  PL001B, PL457BS and PL242 expire in 2036. PL 338BS expire in 2029.

Main producing fields in on
the Operations West area are Troll, Oseberg, Gullfaks, Kvitebjørn, Visund and Grane

NCS

Operation West produces approximately half of Statoil’s equity production in Norway. Its
Statoil operated fields
main focus is prolonging and increasing production through increased oil recovery, exploration and new field developments.

Troll is the largest gas field on the NCS and a major oil field. The Troll field is split into three hydrocarbon-bearing regions are connected to three platforms:the Troll A, B and C. TheC platforms. Troll gas is mainly exported and produced at the Troll A, platform, while oil is mainly produced at Troll B and C. Fram, and Fram H Nord and Byrding are tie-ins to Troll C.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201521


In October 2015 Troll A finalised the third and fourth pre-compressor project as described in the original PDO for the Troll field. The purpose of the project is to increase gas production by installing two extra pre-compressors on the Troll A platform.

 

The Oseberg area includes the Oseberg Field Centre, Oseberg C, Oseberg East and Oseberg South production platforms. Oil and gas from the satellites are transported in pipelines to the Oseberg Field Centre for processing and transportation.

The Delta2 facilities project on Oseberg Field Center was completed in 2015. Drilling operations related to the project have been on-going throughout 2015 and were finalised in January 2016. The Vestflanken2 project at Oseberg Field Center was sanctioned December 2015 with drilling to be performed by the Cat-J rig on the new unmanned wellhead platform, both under construction, with drilling expected to start third quarter in 2017. The Tender Support Vessel (TSV) project at Oseberg Øst is expected to commence drilling support operations in 2016.

Gullfaks has beenwas developed with three large concrete production platforms. Since production started on Gullfaks in 1986, fiveseveral satellite fields have been developed with subsea wells that are remotely controlled from the Gullfaks A and C platforms.

 

Drilling of24Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


The Åsgard field includes the new Gullfaks South Increased Oil Recovery (GSO IOR) project wellsÅsgard A production and storage ship for oil, the Åsgard B semi-submersible floating production platform for gas and condensate, and the Åsgard C storage vessel for oil and condensate. Åsgard C is ongoing. Operationsalso storage for oil produced at Kristin and Tyrihans. In 2015 Statoil started the world first subsea gas compressor train on Åsgard, and the satellitessecond train was started in February 2016. Mikkel and Morvin are tie-ins to Åsgard. The Trestakk development will continuebe a tie-in to Åsgard A with a mobile rig until September 2016 and planproduction start planned for development and operation for Shetland/Lista was delivered in second quarter of 2015.2019.

 

The Gullfaks Rimfaksdalen (PDO) was submitted in 2014Visund is an oil and gas field that includes a floating drilling, production will start up in the fourthand living quarter of 2016. Drilling of wells was completed in 2015. The projects Gullfaks B Drilling Upgradeunit and Gullfaks South IOR both started up in 2015.two subsea templates.

 

Kvitebjørn is a gas and condensate field. The field is developed with an integrated accommodation, drilling and processing facility with a steel jacket.

 

The Valemon field is a gas and condensate field between Kvitebjørn and Gullfaks South. Valemon is built as a normally not manned, fixed steel platform with separation facilities for gas, condensate and water. The condensate is piped to Kvitebjørn for stabilisation and from there to the Mongstad refinery near Bergen. The production started in January 2015.

Visund is an oil and gas field development that includes floating drilling, production and living quarter units and two subsea templates, in the northern and southern parts of the field.

Graneis Statoil's largest producing heavy oil field. The Svalin field is a tie-in to Grane platform.

The Heimdal platforms are a hub for the processing and distribution of gas to the European gas markets. The hub consists of an integrated steel platform and a riser platform. During 2015 Heimdal has plugged and abandoned its production wells in the main reservoir. Heimdal will start production in 2016 from one new well drilled from the modular rig which was temporarily installed for plugging and abandonment activity.

3.5.2.4 Operations South

The main producing fields in Operations South are Sleipner, Gudrun, Statfjord and Snorre.

Operation South represents a mature oil and gas province. However, it still remains a significant contributor to Statoil’s equity production and new fields are under development in the area. Main focus in the area is to capitalise on existing fields through profitable realisation of increased oil potential and successful implementation of new developments.

Sleipner consists of the Sleipner East, Gungne and Sleipner West gas and condensate fields. The gas from Sleipner has a high level of CO. This is extracted at the field and re-injected into a sand layer beneath the seabed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions to the air. Sleipner also processes gas, condensate and oil from Gudrun, Volve and Sigyn. The Gina Krog field, currently under development, will also be tied back to Sleipner.

The Gudrun field is a separate steel jacket-based process platform for separation of oil and gas, with separate pipelines transporting gas and partly stabilised oil from Gudrun to Sleipner.

Statfjord has been developed using three fully integrated platforms supported by gravity-based structures with concrete storage cells and an offshore loading system. Statfjord North, Statfjord Øst and Sygna are satellite fields have all been developed using subsea templates tied back to Statfjord C.

The Snorre field has two floating platforms and one subsea production system connected to the Snorre A platform. In addition, the satellite fields Tordis and Vigdis are part of Snorre business unit and are tied back to Gullfaks C and Snorre A, respectively.

22Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


3.5.2.5 Partner-operated fields

Partner-operated fields account for approximately 11% of our total oil and gas production on the NCS. The main producing fields are Ormen Lange, Skarv and Ekofisk.

Statoil's partner operated fields NCS portfolio is organised under Operations South.

Ormen Lange operated by A/S Norske Shell, is a deepwater gas field in the Norwegian Sea. The well stream is transported to an onshore processing and export plant at Nyhamna. Gassco AS became operator of Nyhamna JV from 1 October 2017, with Shell as technical service provider.

 

Skarv is an oil and gas field located in the Norwegian Sea, with Aker BP ASA as operator. The field development includes a floating production, storage and offloading vessel (FPSO) and five subsea multi-well installations.

 

Ekofisk Ivar Aasenis operated by ConocoPhillips.Aker BP ASA. It consists of the Ekofisk, Eldfisk and Embla fields, and Tor. The Eldfisk II project delivered a new PDQ platform early 2015 that will serve as Eldfisk field center.

Edvard Grieg is an oil field located in the Utsira High Area. The field development includes a fixed steel jacket with processing and export facilities. Edvard Grieg is operated by Lundin. Production started on 28 November 2015 according to plan. Two wells were ready at start-up. Drilling will continue and a total of 10 production wells and four injection wells are planned.

3.5.3 Exploration on the NCS

Continued high exploration activity on the NCS

An extensive drilling program in 2015 resulted in 21 completed wells, of which 10 were discoveries. A total of 16 wells were Statoil operated.

Statoil has delivered an application for the 23rd concession round on the NCS. The round covers 57 blocks and parts of blocks, with three in the Norwegian Sea and 54 in the Barents Sea. South-East Barents Sea is the first new exploration acreage area opened on the NCS since 1994. Statoil and 15 other companies cooperate in the Barents Sea Exploration Collaboration (BaSEC) project to find common solutions for exploration operations in the Barents Sea and to ensure cost-effectiveness and good safety standards.

Statoil has been awarded interest in 24 licences in the Awards in Predefined Areas (APA) round 2015 on the NCS, 13 of those as operator and 11 as partner. Statoil has been awarded new licences in all three NCS provinces – North Sea, Norwegian Sea and the Barents Sea.

In general, Statoil’s exploration strategy on the NCS is reflected in its diverse exploration portfolio, which ranges from frontier drilling to infra-structure led exploration close to existing infrastructure.

The table below shows the exploration and development wells drilled on the NCS in the last three years.

 

 

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

North Sea

 

 

 

Statoil operated exploratory

11

11

11

Partner operated exploratory

3

7

10

 

 

 

 

 

Norwegian Sea

 

 

 

Statoil operated exploratory

5

0

7

Partner operated exploratory

1

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

Barents Sea

 

 

 

Statoil operated exploratory

0

9

2

Partner operated exploratory

1

1

4

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

 

 

 

Exploratory

21

29

35

Exploration extension wells

3

2

7

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201523


Potential producing areas

In addition to producing areas, Statoil operates a significant number of exploration licences. Exploration takes place in undeveloped frontier areas as well as near existing infrastructure and producing fields.

Area

Square km (NCS Total)

Square km (Statoil)

Change vs 2014

Number of licenses (NCS Total)

Number of licenses (Statoil equity)

Number of licenses (Statoil operated)

New licenses (Statoil equity)

New licenses (Statoil operated)

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Sea

 43,928  

 13,884  

 (1,006) 

 304  

 125  

 95  

 9  

 7  

 

Norwegian Sea

 37,784  

 12,581  

 (1,681) 

 144  

 79  

 55  

 9  

 4  

 

Barents Sea

 32,998  

 13,802  

 (135) 

 63  

 31  

 19  

 1  

 -  

 

NCS total

 114,710  

 40,267  

 (2,822) 

 511  

 235  

 169  

 19  

 11  

 



North Sea

In the North Sea, Statoil participated in 14 exploration wells. Statoil operated ten of the exploration wells with seven discoveries.

Norwegian Sea

In the Norwegian Sea, Statoil participated in six exploration wells. Statoil operated five of the exploration wells with three discoveries. 

Barents Sea

No Statoil operated wells in 2015. One partner operated well was completed in 2015.

3.5.4 Fields under development on the NCS

The main sanctioned development projects on the NCS.

The table below shows some key figures as of 31 December 2015 for Statoil’s major development projects on the NCS.

Sanctioned projects

Operator

Statoil's equity share

Time of sanctioning

Production start

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aasta Hansteen

Statoil

51.00%

2013

2018

 

Johan Sverdrup

Statoil

40.01%

2015

2019

 

Gina Krog

Statoil

58.70%

2012

2017

 

Ivar Aasen

Det Norske

41.47%

2012

2016

 

Goliat

Eni

35.00%

2009

2016

 

Martin Linge

Total

19.00%

2011

2016

 

Johan Sverdrup is an oil discovery in the southern part of the North Sea, approximately 140 km west of Stavanger. A plan for development and operation was submitted in February 2015 and approved by the Norwegian authorities in August 2015. The Phase 1 of the development will consist of 35 production and water injection wells and a field center with four platforms: A living quarter platform, a wellhead platform with permanent drilling facility, a processing platform and a riser and utility platform. The crude oil will be exported to Mongstad through a 274 km long dedicated pipeline, and the gas will be exported to the gas processing facility at Kårstø through a 156 km long pipeline via a subsea connection to the Statpipe pipeline. The expected production start-up is in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Aasta Hansteenis a deep water gas discovery in the Norwegian Sea. The development concept includes three subsea templates tied in to a floating processing unit with gas export through a new pipeline, Polarled, to Nyhamna and further exportation through the Langeled pipeline. The Aasta Hansteen processing unit can also serve as a hub for other potential discoveries in the area. Expected production start-up is in 2018.

Gina Krog is an oil and gas discovery in the North Sea approximately 30 kilometres north of the Sleipner field. The field development concept includes a steel-jacket platform. Oil will be exported via offshore loading from a floating storage unit. Due to the high condensate content, the rich gas will be exported via Sleipner, where it will be further processed. The development concept also includes gas injection in order to maximise the recovery factor for the field. The development concept includes a total of 15 wells. Expected production start-up is in 2017.

Ivar Aasen is an oil and gas field located in the Utsira High Area.North Sea. The development includes a fixed steel jacket with partial processing and living quarters tied in as a satellite to Edvard Grieg for further processing and export. The Ivar Aasen development is operated by Det norske, The operator expects production start-up in the fourth quarter of 2016.

 

Goliatis operated by Eni Norge AS. It is the first oil field to be developed in the Barents Sea. The field is being developed by meansconsists of subsea wells tied back to a circular floating production, storage and offloading vessel (FPSO). The oil will beis offloaded to shuttle tankers. The Goliat development

Ekofisk is operated by ConocoPhillips Skandinavia AS. It consists of the Ekofisk, Tor, Eldfisk and Embla fields.

Marulk is operated by Eni whoNorge AS. It is a gas- and condensate field developed as a tie-back to the Norne FPSO.

Exploration on the NCS

Statoil holds exploration acreage and actively explores for new resources in all three regions on the NCS, the Norwegian Sea, the North Sea and the Barents Sea.

Statoil was awarded 31 licences (17 as operator) in the Awards for Predefined Areas (APA) round 2017 for mature areas and completed several farm-in transactions with other companies.

Throughout 2017, as part of the industry initiative Barents Sea Exploration Collaboration (BaSEC), Statoil and its partners have drilled 6 wells in the Barents Sea and are planning to continue drilling wells in the area also in 2018.

In 2017 Statoil and its partners completed 17 exploratory wells and made 10 commercial and 3 non-commercial discoveries in Norway. In 2018 Statoil expects production start-up during first quarterto complete 25-30 exploration wells on the NCS, with exploration near existing infrastructure to be the core of 2016.the activity plan.

 

Exploratory wells drilled1)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

North Sea

 

 

 

Statoil operated

5

9

11

Partner operated

1

2

3

Norwegian Sea

 

 

 

Statoil operated

5

2

5

Partner operated

0

0

1

Barents Sea

 

 

 

Statoil operated

5

0

0

Partner operated

1

1

1

Total (gross)

17

14

21

 

1) Wells completed during the year, including appraisals of earlier discoveries.

 

24Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    25


 

 

Fields under development on the NCS

Statoil’s major development projects on the NCS as of 31 December 2017:

Oseberg Vestflanken 2 (Statoil 49.3%, operator) is the development of the oil and gas structures Alfa, Gamma and Kappa. The well stream will be routed to the Oseberg field centre through a new pipeline. The discoveries will be developed using an unmanned wellhead platform. Production is expected to start in mid-2018.

Aasta Hansteen(Statoil 51%, operator) is a deep-water gas discovery in the Norwegian Sea. The field development includes three subsea templates tied in to a floating processing unit with gas export through a new pipeline, Polarled, to Nyhamna and further export through the Langeled pipeline. The Aasta Hansteen processing unit can also serve as a hub for other potential discoveries in the area. On 11 November 2017, the drilling of the first well of the Aasta Hansteen field development commenced. The topside and substructure were integrated in December 2017 in Norway. Production is expected to start in second half of 2018.

Johan Sverdrup (Statoil 40.03%, operator, with additional 4.54% indirect interest held through Lundin)is an oil discovery in the North Sea. Phase 1 of the development will consist of 35 production and water injection wells and a field centre with four platforms: A living quarter platform, a wellhead platform with permanent drilling facility, a processing platform and a riser and utility platform. Crude oil will be exported to Mongstad through a 274 km designated pipeline, and gas will be exported to the gas processing facility at Kårstø through a 156 km pipeline via a subsea connection to the Statpipe pipeline. As at the end of 2017, eight production wells and nine water injection wells have been drilled. Production is expected to start late fourth quarter 2019.

Utgard (Statoil 38.44% interest in the Norwegian and 38% in the UK sector, operator) is a gas and condensate discovery in the North Sea. The development includes two wells in a standard subsea concept, with one drilling target on each side of the UK-Norwegian maritime border. Gas and condensate will be piped through a new pipeline to the Sleipner field for processing and further transportation to market.  In January 2017, the Plan for Development and Operation and the field development plan were approved by the Norwegian and UK authorities. Production is expected to start in fourth quarter 2019.

Trestakk (Statoil 59.1%, operator) is an oil discovery with associated gas on Haltenbanken. It will be developed as a subsea tie-back to Åsgard A, comprising one subsea template and one satellite with three producers and two injectors. In March 2017, the Plan for Development and Operation was approved by the Norwegian authorities. Production is expected to start in 2019.

Martin Linge(Statoil 19%, and upon consummation of the acquisition from Total, 70%) is an oil and gas field operated by Total, near the British sector inof the North Sea. The reservoir is complex with gas under high pressure and high temperatures. In late November 2017, Statoil and Total announced that Statoil will purchase Total’s interest (51%) and assume the operatorship of Martin Linge, with an effective date, upon consummation, of January 1, 2018. The transaction is subject to certain conditions and is expected to close in late March 2018. The development includes a platform as a fixed steel jacket platform with processing and export facilities. Electricalfacilities, with electric power willto be supplied from Kollsnes. TheTotal, the current operator, expects production start-upto start in 2018.2019.

 

Redevelopment on the NCS - Improved oil recovery Njord future(IOR)

In 2015 Statoil started the world’s first subsea gas compression plant at the Åsgard field. Processing on the seabed, particularly gas compression, (Statoil 20%, operator) is important for developing seabed solutions for areas of deeper watera development to enable safe, reliable and in colder and more challenging areas. Åsgard’s subsea compression, the world’s first subsea gas compression plant, is one of Statoil's most demanding technology projects. The compressors will increase recovery from the Midgard reservoir on Åsgard from 67 percent to 87 percent, and from the Mikkel reservoir from 59 percent to 84 percent, extending the operational lifeefficient exploitation of the fields upNjord and Hyme oil discoveries through to 20322040. The development comprises an upgrade of the Njord A platform, an optimal oil export solution and contributingdrilling of 10 new wells. The Plan for Development and Operation was approved on 20 June 2017. Production is expected to significant reductionstart in energy consumption and CO2 emissions over the fields’ lifetimes.late 2020.

 

The Gullfaks subsea compression projectSnorre expansion (Statoil 33.28%, operator) is a development to produce the second largest subsea gas compression project being developed by Statoilremaining commercial oil reserves on the NCS. Subsea gas compressionSnorre field. The Plan for Development and Operation of the field was submitted to the Norwegian authorities on 21 December 2017. The concept consists of six subsea templates, with four well slots each. Each slot will have a significant impact on the Gullfaks field as this technology, combined with conventional low-pressurepossibility for either production or injection. 24 wells will be drilled, 12 production wells and 12 injection wells. Production is expected to lift the recovery rate from the Gullfaks South Brent reservoir from 62% to 74%.start in 2021.

 

Johan Castberg (Statoil 50%, operator) is the development of the three oil discoveries Skrugard, Havis and Drivis, located some 140 kilometres northwest of Hammerfest. The Smørbukk South Extension project, in the Åsgard field, isdevelopment includes a world class project production from tight formations previously regarded as infeasible. Production began in September 2015 through the combination ofvessel and a subsea development with 30 wells, with long well sections and “fishbones”, a new completion technology implemented for the first time on the NCS, and further utilisation of existing infrastructure at Åsgard.

Troll A field’s two new topside compressors started operating in October 2015. Installation of these compressors is an important step to achieve the Troll field's long-term production profile, which now extends to 2063. They are operated with power from shore, which reduces the field’s CO2 emissions significantly.

The Gullfaks South Oil (GSO) project started production in July 2015 and will increase recovery from the Gullfaks area. It includes twoten subsea templates four production wells,and two gas injectors, a gas injection pipelinesatellite structures. The Plan for Development and umbilicals and power cables for pipeline heating. The project utilise spare processing capacity and will extend the Gullfaks A platform life beyond 2030.

The Gullfaks B lifetime extension project aims at extending the drilling program on the Gullfaks B platform until 2032. Operation started on August 2015. Many of the future wellsfield was submitted to the Norwegian authorities on 5 December 2017. Production is expected to start in Gullfaks B are water injection wells that will help maintain production from all three of the platforms in the field through increased pressure support in the reservoir. The drilling upgrade also provides the opportunity to connect to smaller producers from the surrounding area.2022.





26Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

The Ormen Lange onshore compression project being executed as part of the overall expansion of the Nyhamna facility to handle third-party gas entering the plant through the new Polarled pipeline. The two 37 MW onshore compressors are scheduled for start-up in July 2017.

These projects are all examples of Statoil’s efforts to maximise recovery from existing fields. They have also opened opportunities for technology application to realise volumes from other fields with similar conditions.

 

3.5.5 Decommissioning on the NCS

Under the Petroleum Act, the Norwegian government has imposed strict procedures for removal and disposal of offshore oil and gas installations. The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Northeast Atlantic (OSPAR) stipulates similar procedures.

 

Glitne ceased production in February 2013 and decommissioning of the field has been ongoing 2013 - 2015. Permanent plugging and abandonment of the seven wells completed in October 2014. All facilities/equipment were removed from the field in 2015. Safety zones in the area have been repealed and national maps updated.

Huldra ceased production in September 2014, after 13 years in production. PermanentThe permanent plugging and abandonment of six wells was finalised in 2017, and removal of platform is planned for in 2019.

Volve ceased production in September 2016, after more than eight years in production. The permanent plugging of wells was finalised during 2016, and the planremoval of subsea facilities is that the Huldra topside facilities will be removed in 2019.

Yttergryta is a subsea field with one production well that ceased production in 2013. Permanent plugging of the well was completed early in 2015.

On Heimdal a modular drilling rig has been successfully installed in order to plug and abandon all 12 wells at the Heimdal main reservoir. The plug and abandonment project started in the fourth quarter 2014, and is scheduledexpected to be finalised by second quarter 2016.completed in 2018.

 

During 20152017, there were permanent plugging and abandonment operations at Statfjord, Øst, Statfjord A, SleipnerHeidrun, Veslefrikk, Troll, Åsgard, Njord, Visund, Skuld and Tordis. In addition Åsgard decommissioned part of the Midgard flowline loop in 2015.Tune. The partner-operated fields Ekofisk and Ormen Lange also had ongoing plugging and abandonment activities.

 

For further information about decommissioning, see note 2 Significant accounting policies to the Consolidated financial statements.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    2527


 

3.6 Development and Production2.4 E&P International (DPI)– exploration & PRODUCTION INTERNATIONAL

 

E&P International overview

3.6.1 DPI overview

Statoil is present in several of the most important oil and gas provinces in the world.

Development and Exploration & Production International (DPI) is responsible for all(E&P International) reporting segment covers development and production of oil and gas outside the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS).

 

In 2015, DPI was engagedE&P International is present in nearly 30 countries and had production in 11 countries: Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Canada, Ireland, Nigeria, Russia, the UK, the US, and Venezuela. DPI12 countries in 2017. E&P International produced 37%36% of Statoil's total equity production of oil and gas in 2015.

As of 31 December 2015, Statoil has exploration licenses in North America (Canada2017. For information about proved reserves development see section 2.8 Operational performance under Proved oil and US), South America and sub-Saharan Africa (Angola, Brazil, Colombia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Suriname, South Africa and Tanzania), North Africa (Algeria and Libya), Europe and Asia (Azerbaijan, Greenland, Indonesia, Myanmar, Russia and the UK) as well as Oceania (Australia and New Zealand). The main development projects in which DPI is involved are in Brazil, Canada, the UK, and the US.

Statoil also has representative offices in Kazakhstan, Mexico and United Arab Emirates.

Statoil closed its office in Iran in 2013 but has residual payment obligations for tax and social security under legacy contracts in Iran. These will be dealt with in accordance with all applicable sanctions. See section 5.1.1 Risks related to our business for information regarding sanctions towards Iran.gas reserves.

 

The map shows Statoil’s international producing countries and additionalthe countries where StatoilE&P International has discoveries and/or exploration acreage.

activity.

26Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015




Key events and portfolio developments in 2015:2017 and early 2018:


28   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


·         Eight wells (explorationIn January 2017, the plan for development and appraisal) were announced as discoveriesoperation for the Utgard field was approved by the Norwegian and UK authorities. The Utgard field spans the UK-Norway maritime border. For more information, see Fields under development on the NCS in 2015, including the Piri 2, Tangawizi 2 and Mdalasini (Statoil-operated) discoveries in Tanzania

·Statoil accessed new acreage in Lampyrus in Russia, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Flemish Pass basin and Nova Scotia in East Coast Canada and South Africasection 2.3 E&P Norway

·        In January, a transaction with Southwestern Energy was closed. The agreement reduced Statoil’s working interest February, the In Amenas Gas Compression project in the non-operated US southern Marcellus onshore asset from 29% to 23%Algeria came into operation

·        DelayOn 31 January, the transaction to divest Statoil’s 100% owned Kai Kos Dehseh (KKD) oil sands projects in the Canadian province of Big Foot development firstAlberta to Athabasca Oil Corporation (AOC) was completed. The transaction covers the producing Leismer asset and the undeveloped Corner project, along with a number of contracts associated with Leismer’s production. Following this transaction, Statoil no longer owns or operates any oil sands assets. As part of the transaction, Statoil will own just below 20% of AOC’s shares, and this will be managed as a financial investment. For more information about the transaction see note 4 Acquisitions and divestments to the Consolidated financial statements

·In March, Statoil was awarded 13 leases in the US Gulf of Mexico. TheMexico

·In March, Statoil was awarded six new licences, five as operator, Chevron expects first oil in 2018. Initial plans called for production to startthe 29th Offshore Licensing Round in late 2015, however, installation was halted andUK

·In April, Statoil acquired an additional 14% working interest in existing Statoil-operated unconventional onshore assets in the tension leg plarform (TLP) moved to sheltered waters following damage to subsea installation tendons in late May 2015Appalachian region from Northwood Energy Corporation.

·         In April, the Kizomba Satellites Phase 2 project in Block 15Vito (Statoil 37%, Shell operator) offshore Angola started productiondiscovery received approval for its concept development and selection

·         In April, StatoilMay, the Stampede (Statoil 25%, Hess operator) asset’s offshore platform was successfully installed; and subsea work was completed its sale of its remaining 15.5% interestand all three wells were ready at year end 2017. Production commenced with first oil in Shah Deniz and the South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP) to the Malaysian oil and gas company PETRONAS. The effective date was 1 January 20142018.

·         In August,June, Statoil signed a swap agreement with BP regarding exploration permits in the Peregrino field offshore Brazil passed a significant milestone with 100 million barrels of oil produced since production startedGreat Australian Bight and became operator and 100% equity interest holder in April 2011exploration permits EPP39 and EPP40 while Statoils equity interest in EPP37 and EPP38 were transferred to BP

·         In July, Statoil and Queiroz Galvão Exploração e Produção (QGEP) signed an agreement for Statoil to acquire QGEP’s 10% interest in the Statoil operated BM-S-8 licence in Brazil, thereby increasing Statoil’s interest in the licence to 76%. The transaction was completed in December.For more information about the transaction see note 4 Acquisitions and divestments to the Consolidated financial statements

·In September, Statoil completed transactions in South Africa for exploration rights, one with ExxonMobil Exploration and Production South Africa acquiring an interest in Transkei Algoa and one with OK Energy Ltd. to acquire interest and operatorship in East Algoa. 

·In October, Statoil, as part of a consortium with ExxonMobil and Galp, presented the winning bid for theCarcará North block in the Santos basin in Brazil. The award closed in December 2017. Statoil is the operator and has 40% interest. 
In addition, Statoil, ExxonMobil and Galp have agreed on subsequent transactions in the adjacent
BM-S-8 block to align equity interests across the two blocks that together comprise the Carcará oil discovery. Upon consummation and subject to government approval, Statoil will have a 36.5% interest in BM-S-8 and a 40% interest in Carcará North and will be the operator of the unitised Carcará field development.  For more information about the transactions see note 4 Acquisitions and divestments to the Consolidated financial statements

·Statoil and the international partners in the ACG licence (Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli fields) in Azerbaijan have secured an extension of oil production of 25 years from 2024 under an extended and amended PSA, which was ratified by the Azeri Parliament on 31 October. As part of the agreement, Statoil's interest in the field has been adjusted from 8.56% to 7.27%, effective from 1 January 2017

·On 3027 November, the Hebron oil field (Statoil 9%, ExxonMobil operator) offshore Canada started production

·In December, the Shell operated Corrib gasStatoil and Petrobras signed an agreement that Statoil will acquire a 25% interest in Roncador, a producing oil field in Ireland started productionthe Campos Basin in Brazil. Petrobras retains operatorship and a 75% interest. The field produced around 280 mboe per day in 2017. The effective date for the Roncador transaction is 1 January 2018. Closing is subject to government approval. For more information about the transactions see note 4 Acquisitions and divestments to the Consolidated financial statements

·         In December, Statoil completedand the sale of its 20% interest in Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG (TAP) to the Italian gas infrastructure company Snam. TAP is an 882 km-long section of the Southern Gas Corridor, linking Shah Deniz Stage 2 to gas markets in Europe

·In December, transactions with Repsol were announced. As a result of these transactions, Statoil’s working interestother partners BP and Sonatrach in the US Eagle Ford increased from 50% to 63% and Statoil took full operatorship. In addition, Statoil will assume operatorship of the BM-C-33Amenas licence in Brazil’s Campos basinAlgeria secured a licence extension of 5 years from 2022 through an amended and acquire a 31% equity share in the UK licence for Alfa Sentral, a field which spans the UK-Norway maritime border. The transactions for BM-C-33 and Alfa Sentral are pendingrestated Production Sharing Agreement (PSA). Closing is subject to government approval  from relevant government authorities

·In February 2016, the In Salah Gas joint venture announced the start- up of operations at the In Salah Southern Fields project in Algeria

·Significant impairment losses on assets and oil and gas prospects and signature bonuses were recognised in 2015, see section 4.1.5 DPI profit and loss analysis for further details

The profitability of our industry continues to be challenged. Statoil’s response to the industrial challenge characterised by high costs and declining returns is addressed in the section 2 Strategy and market overview.

 

3.6.2 International productionINTERNATIONAL PRODUCTION

Statoil's entitlement production outside Norway was about 32% of Statoil's total entitlement production in 2015.

The following table shows DPI's average daily entitlement production of liquids and natural gas for the years ending 31 December 2015, 2014 and 2013. Entitlement production figuresvolumes are after deductions forStatoil’s share of the volumes distributed to the partners according to production sharing agreement (PSA) (see section 5.6Terms and profit sharing.abbreviations). For US assets entitlement production are is expressed net of royalty interests. For all other countries royalties paid in-cash are included in entitlement production and royalties payable in-kind are excluded.
Equity production represent volumes that correspond to Statoil’s percentage ownership in a particular field and is larger than Statoil’s entitlement production if the field is governed by a PSA.

Statoil's equity production outside Norway was 36% of Statoil's total equity production of oil and gas in 2017. Statoil's entitlement production outside Norway was about 31% of Statoil's total entitlement production in 2017.

The following table shows E&P International's average daily entitlement production of liquids and natural gas for the years ending 31 December 2017, 2016 and 2015.  

 

 

For the year ended 31 December

Entitlement production

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Oil and NGL (mboe per day)

436

383

354

Natural gas (mmcm per day)

23

26

23

Total (mboe per day)

580

546

502

 

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    2729


Average daily entitlement production

For the year ended 31 December

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

 

Oil and NGL

Natural gas

 

Production area

mboe/day

mmcm/day

mboe/day

 

mboe/day

mmcm/day

mboe/day

 

mboe/day

mmcm/day

mboe/day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 186  

 19  

 304  

 

 189  

 18  

 299  

 

 177  

 17  

 283  

Africa

 197  

 6  

 233  

 

 203  

 5  

 232  

 

 211  

 5  

 241  

Eurasia

 26  

 3  

 46  

 

 32  

 3  

 50  

 

 36  

 1  

 44  

Equity accounted production

 5  

 -    

 5  

 

 10  

 -    

 10  

 

 12  

 -    

 12  

Total

 415  

 27  

 588  

 

 435  

 25  

 592  

 

 436  

 23  

 580  

30Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


 

The table below provides information about the fields that contributed to production in 2015

Producing fields during calendar year 20152017. Equity production per field is included in this table.

 

Field

Statoil's equity interest in %

Operator 

On stream 

Licence expiry date

Average daily equity production mboe/day

Average daily entitlement production mboe/day

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

 

 

 

282.3

239.7

 

US: Marcellus 1)

Varies

Statoil/others

2008

HBP2)

115.7

96.9

 

US: Bakken 1)

Varies

Statoil/others

2011

HBP2)

61.6

49.3

 

US: Eagle Ford 1)

Varies

Statoil

2010

HBP2)

34.7

26.6

 

US: Tahiti

25.00

Chevron

2009

HBP2)

16.9

13.9

 

US: Caesar Tonga

23.55

Anadarko

2012

HBP2)

9.1

8.7

 

US: St. Malo

21.50

Chevron

2014

HBP2)

7.6

7.6

 

US: Jack

25.00

Chevron

2014

HBP2)

6.6

6.6

 

Canada: Leismer Demo

100.00

Statoil

2010

HBP2)

19.9

19.9

 

Canada: Terra Nova

15.00

Suncor

2002

2022

5.4

5.4

 

Canada: Hibernia/Hibernia southern extension3)

Varies

HMDC

1997

2027

4.8

4.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South America

  

  

  

  

43.5

43.5

 

Brazil: Peregrino

60.00

Statoil

2011

2034

43.5

43.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sub-Saharan Africa

 

 

  

  

273.3

197.8

 

Angola, Block 17

23.33

Total

2001

2022-344)

161.9

113.9

 

Angola, Block 15

13.33

ExxonMobil

2004

2026-324)

41.8

22.6

 

Angola, Block 31

13.33

BP

2012

2031

20.9

19.0

 

Angola: Block 4/055)

20.00

Sonangol P&P

2009

2026

1.4

1.3

 

Nigeria: Agbami

20.21

Chevron

2008

2024

47.3

41.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Africa

 

 

  

  

49.6

43.6

 

Algeria: In Salah

31.85

Sonatrach/BP/Statoil

2004

2027

32.5

30.6

 

Algeria: In Amenas

45.90

Sonatrach/BP/Statoil

2006

2022

17.1

13.3

 

Libya: Mabruk

12.50

Mabruk Oil Operations

1995

2033

0.0

(0.0)6)

 

Libya: Murzuq

10.00

Akakus Oil Operations

2003

2033

0.0

(0.2)6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Europe and Asia

 

 

 

 

78.3

43.9

 

Azerbaijan: ACG

8.56

BP

1997

2024

54.3

24.2

 

Azerbaijan: Shah Deniz 7)

15.50

BP

2006

2041

12.0

10.0

 

Russia: Kharyaga

30.00

Total

1999

2032

9.4

7.1

 

UK: Alba

17.00

Chevron

1994

2018

2.5

2.5

 

UK: Jupiter

30.00

ConocoPhillips

1995

HBP2)

0.1

0.1

 

Ireland: Corrib8)

36.50

Shell

2015

2031

0.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Development and Production International (DPI)

 

 

727.0

568.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Venezuela: Petrocedeño9)

9.68

Petrocedeño

2008

2033

11.6

11.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Development and Production International (DPI) including share of equity accounted production

 

 

738.7

580.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Statoil’s actual working interest can vary depending on wells and area

 

2)

Held by Production (HBP): A company’s right to own and operate an oil and gas lease is perpetuated beyond its original primary term, as long thereafter as oil and gas is produced in paying quantities. In the case of Canada, besides continue being in production status, other regulatory requirements must be met

 

3)

Statoil's working interests are 5.0% in Hibernia and 9.0% in Hibernia southern extension

 

4)

Varies by field

 

5)

Statoil relinguished Block 4/05 in September 2015

 

6)

Zero production in 2015, adjustment of 2014 volume

 

7)

Statoil divested the asset on 30 April 2015

 

8)

 New gas field which started production on 30 December 2015

 

9)

Petrocedeño is a non-consolidated company and accounted for pursuant to the equity accounting method

 

Field

Country

Statoil's equity interest in %

Operator 

On stream 

 

Licence expiry date

Average daily equity production in 2017 mboe/day

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

 

 

 

 

 

349.5

Appalachian1) 2)

US

Varies

Statoil/others

2008

 

HBP3)

128.4

Bakken 1)

US

Varies

Statoil/others

2011

 

HBP3)

57.0

Peregrino

Brazil

60.00

Statoil

2011

 

2034

39.9

Eagle Ford 1)

US

Varies

Statoil/others

2010

 

HBP3)

34.3

Tahiti

US

25.00

Chevron

2009

 

HBP3)

24.9

St. Malo

US

21.50

Chevron

2014

 

HBP3)

18.1

Caesar Tonga

US

23.55

Anadarko

2012

 

HBP3)

11.0

Hibernia/Hibernia Southern Extension 4)

Canada

Varies

HMDC

1997

 

HBP3)

10.4

Jack

US

25.00

Chevron

2014

 

HBP3)

8.3

Julia

US

50.00

ExxonMobil

2016

 

HBP3)

6.4

Terra Nova

Canada

15.00

Suncor

2002

 

HBP3)

4.6

Heidelberg

US

12.00

Anadarko

2016

 

HBP3)

4.5

Leismer

Canada

100.00

Statoil

2010

 

HBP3)

1.8

Hebron

Canada

9.01

ExxonMobil

2017

 

HBP3)

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Africa

 

 

 

  

 

  

310.0

Block 17

Angola

23.33

Total

2001

 

2022-345)

139.6

Agbami

Nigeria

20.21

Chevron

2008

 

2024

47.6

In Salah

Algeria

31.85

Sonatrach/BP/Statoil

2004

 

2027

39.1

Block 15

Angola

13.33

ExxonMobil

2004

 

2026-325)

37.4

In Amenas

Algeria

45.90

Sonatrach/BP/Statoil

2006

 

2022

23.6

Block 31

Angola

13.33

BP

2012

 

2031

18.9

Murzuq

Libya

10.00

Akakus Oil Operations

2003

 

2035

3.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eurasia

 

 

 

 

 

 

80.8

ACG 6)

Azerbaijan

7.27

BP

1997

 

2049

49.1

Corrib

Ireland

36.50

Shell

2015

 

2031

20.0

Kharyaga

Russia

30.00

Zarubezhneft

1999

 

2031

9.4

Alba

UK

17.00

Chevron

1994

 

HBP3)

2.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total E&P International

 

 

 

740.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Petrocedeño 7)

Venezuela

9.67

Petrocedeño

2008

 

2033

4.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total E&P International including share of equity accounted production

 

 

745.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Statoil’s actual equity interest can vary depending on wells and area.

2)

Appalachian basin contains Marcellus and Utica formations.

3)

Held by Production (HBP): A company’s right to own and operate an oil and gas lease is perpetuated beyond its original primary term, as long thereafter as oil and gas is produced in paying quantities. In the case of Canada, in addition to continuing to be in production, other regulatory requirements must be met.

4)

Statoil's equity interests are 5.0% in Hibernia and 9.26% in Hibernia South Extension. Effective 1 May 2017, Statoil’s interest in Hibernia South Extension increased from 9.03% to 9.26% due to an equity reset trigger defined in the joint operating agreement.

5)

Licence expiry varies by field.

6)

As of 1 November 2017, Statoil's share of ACG  equity production has been adjusted from 8.56% to 7.27% due to ratified lincence extension.

7)

As of 30 June 2017, the 9.67% ownership share in the heavy oil project Petrocedeño in Venezuela was reclassified from an equity accounted investment to a non-current financial investment. Statoil has as of this date stopped including production and reserves from Petrocedeño in financial reporting. Petrocedeño project (former Sincor project) was established in 2008. Sincor project started production in 2001.

28Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    31


The table below provides information about production per country in 2015.

Country

Average daily equity production mboe/day1)

Average daily entitlement production mboe/day

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

282.3

239.7

 

US

252.2

209.6

 

Canada

30.1

30.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

South America

43.5

43.5

 

Brazil

43.5

43.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sub-Saharan Africa

273.3

197.8

 

Angola

226.0

156.8

 

Nigeria

47.3

41.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

North Africa

49.6

43.6

 

Algeria

49.6

43.9

 

Libya

0.0

-0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Europe and Asia

78.3

43.9

 

Azerbaijan

66.3

34.2

 

Russia

9.4

7.1

 

UK

2.6

2.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Development and Production International (DPI)

 727.0  

 568.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted production

 

 

 

Venezuela: Petrocedeño2)

11.6

11.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Development and Production International (DPI) including share of equity accounted production

 738.7  

 580.2  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

In PSA countries our share of capital expenditures and operational expenses are computed on the basis of equity production.

 

2)

Petrocedeño is accounted for pursuant to the equity accounting method.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following sections provide information about the main producing assets internationally. See section 4.1.5 DPI profit and loss analysis for a discussion of the results of operations for year end 2015.

 

3.6.2.1 North AmericaAmericas

USA

Production in North America comprises the US and Canada.

US

Statoil is positioned in the fast-growing US onshore oil and gas industry. Statoil has had strong growth in production and continues to optimise its portfolio within US shale, through acreage acquisition and divestments, since entering the first play in 2008.2008. DPUSA contributed with 14% of Statoil’s equity production in 2017.

 

Statoil entered the Marcellus shale gas play, located in the Appalachian region in north east US, in 2008 through a partnership with Chesapeake Energy Corporation, acquiring 32.5%Corporation. In 2012, Statoil became an operator in the Marcellus, through the purchase of Chesapeake's 1.8 million acresadditional acreage in Marcellus.the states of West Virginia and Ohio. In 2016, Statoil divested its operated assets in West Virginia. During 2017, Statoil has continued to acquiredevelop its operatorship in the Appalachian basin assets in Ohio. Within the operated acreage withinin this basin, Statoil is developing two formations: Marcellus and Utica, with special focus on the play, with alatter. In addition, on April 2017, Statoil acquired an interest in existing Statoil operated assets in the Appalachian from Northwood Energy Corporation. Statoil's net acreage position in Appalachian at the end of 410,0002017 was around 255,000 net acres. The most recent divestments occurred in 2014 with Southwestern. The divested share represents approximately 30,000 acres. Southwestern took over operatorship in this US southern Marcellus area through a transaction with Chesapeake in December 2014.

 

Statoil entered the Bakken tight oil play through the acquisition of Brigham Exploration Company in December 2011. Statoil'sStatoil’s net acreage position in Bakken and Three Forks shale formationformations at the end of 20152017 was 249,000around 235,000 net acres. Statoil has a total working interest of approximately 70% in Bakken and is the asset’s operator.

 

Statoil entered the Eagle Ford shale formation located in southwest Texas in 2010. Through agreements with Enduring Resources LLC and Talisman Energy Inc., Statoil acquired 67,000 net acres. In 2013, Statoil became operator for 50% of the Eagle Ford acreage in 2010 and gradually took over full operatorship of the Statoil operated acreage in 2013. acreage. As part of a global transaction in December 2015 with Repsol, which acquired Talisman in May 2015, Statoil increased its working interest and took full operatorshipbecame operator of all of the assets in the Eagle Ford

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201529


Shale. As a consequence,result, Statoil has a total working interest of 63% representing an addition of 15,000 net acres for a total of 72,000 leaseholds.. Our joint venture partner, Repsol, continues to hold 37% working interest. Statoil's net acreage position in Eagle Ford at the end of 2017 was around 70,000 net acres.

US gathering system

Statoil’s participates in gathering and facilities for initial processing of oil and gas in the BakkenEagle Ford and Appalachian Basin assets in the US. This includes crude and natural gas gathering systems, fresh water supply systems, salt water gathering and disposal wells, oil and gas treatment and processing facilities to provide flow assurance for Statoil’s upstream production. Midstream assets in Bakken are owned and operated 100% by Statoil. In Eagle Ford, Statoil is the operator for 100% of the midstream assets outside of the Oak, Karnes, DeWitt and Bee (KDB) area with a working interest of 63%. In the KDB area of Eagle Ford, Statoil has an ownership interest of 25.2% in Edwards Lime Gathering LLC, which is operated by Energy Transfer Partners L.P. For Appalachian Basin, Statoil has operated assets in Appalachian Basin South in Monroe Country Ohio to gather Marcellus production, while Utica production is gathered by Eureka Hunter, a third party.  In the Appalachian Basin non-operated areas both in the North and South, Statoil’s working interest ranges from 16.25% to 32.5% depending on gathering system and number of JV partners which include Williams Energy and Alta Gas.

In January 2016, the responsibility for the US gathering system was transferred from MMP to E&P International.

 

Statoil is, also, positioned in the US Gulf of Mexico for the following offshore developments:

 

The Tahiti oil field is located in the Green Canyon area. The development includesarea and is produced through a floating spar facility. As of 31 December 2015,2017, there were ninetwelve production and three water injection wells in operation, and additional wells will be phased in over time to fully develop the field.

 

The Caesar Tonga oil field is located in the Green Canyon area. As of 31 December 2015,2017, there were sixseven producing wells tied back to the Anadarko-operated Constitution spar host, and additional production wells will be phased in over time.

 

The Jack and St. Malo oil fields are located in the Walker Ridge area. The fields are subsea tie-backs to the Chevron operated Walker Ridge Regional Host facility. First production was achieved in December 2014. As of 31 December 2015,2017, there were threefive wells producing on Jack and threeeight wells producing for St. Malo. Malo. Additional production wells will be phased in over time.

 

CanadaThe Julia oil field is located in the Walker Ridge area of the US Gulf of Mexico near Jack and St Malo. First oil was in April 2016 and four wells are currently online. Additional production wells may be drilled based on reservoir performance.

Statoil entered

The Heidelberg oil field is located in the Alberta oil sands in 2007Green Canyon area and is produced through a corporate acquisitionfloating spar facility. As of North American Oil Sands Corporation. In May, 2014, Statoil and PTTEP completed a transaction to divide their respective interests31 December 2017, there were five producing wells in the Kai Kos Dehseh (KKD) oil sands project with an effective date of 1 January 2013.

Following the transaction with PTTEP, Statoil continues as operator and 100% working interest owner for the Leismer and Corner projects which together comprise 123,200 net acres of oil sands leases in Alberta. The Leismer Demonstration Plant (LDP) is the first phase of the KKD development and has been in operation since 2010. The in-situ technology known as SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage), injects steam into the oil bearing formation to recover bitumen which is then pumped to the surface. Further oil sands development could involve expanding production capacity of the Leismer facility and/or the greenfield development of the Corner project. At this time, there are no near term plans to further develop either project.operation.

 

In addition weto these fields, on December 2016, Statoil became operator of the Titan offshore platform, at the request of the U.S Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), following the bankruptcy of Bennu Oil & Gas. In addition to the platform itself, Statoil also purchased the export pipelines with capacity to Shell’s Mars system (oil) and William’s Discovery Gas system (gas). Production has been shut in since November 2016; however, plans are currently in place to have the Titan platform re-instate production in 2018. Prior to being shut in, Titan was producing approximately 3,000 boepd from three nearby fields: Telemark (AT63), in which Statoil holds no interest; and Mirage (MC941) and Morgus (MC942), both of which Statoil now has operating rights and holds record title. Acquiring the platform and assets allows Statoil to effectively manage its abandonment obligations and capture value.

32Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


Canada

Statoil has interests in the Jeanne d'Arc Basin offshore the province of Newfoundland and Labrador in the partner operated producing oil fields Terra Nova, Hebron, Hibernia and Hibernia Southern Extension. On 1 December 2015, Statoil's interest in Hibernia Southern Extension was reduced from 10.5% to 9.0% due to a redetermination process..

 

3.6.2.2 South AmericaThe

Hebron field started production in November 2017.  The Hebron field consists of a fixed gravity base structure (GBS) with drilling capabilities and storage for oil. Oil is off-loaded to shuttle tankers.

  

Statoil's production activitiesIn January 2017, Statoil completed the transaction to fully divest to Athabasca Oil Corporation the assets and 123,200 net acres of oil sands leases in South America compriseAlberta which form the Peregrino operatorship in Brazil and theKai Kos Dehseh project.

Petrocedeño project in Venezuela.


Brazil

The Peregrinofield is a heavy oil field located in the Campos Basin, about 85 kilometres off the coast of Rio de Janeiro. The field came on stream in 2011.The oil is produced from two wellhead platforms with drilling capability and it is processed on the Peregrino FPSO.FPSO and offloaded to shuttle tankers. Statoil holds a 60% ownership interest in the field and is operator. In August 2015, the Peregrino field passed a significant milestone with 100 million barrels of oil produced since production start.

 

Venezuela

Petrocedeño produces extra-heavy crude oil from the Junin area in the Orinoco Belt. The oil is transported through pipeline to a plant at the Jose Industrial Complex at the coast nearby Puerta La Cruz where it is upgraded into a light crude and exported.

For information related to Venezuela’s financial risk see section 5.2.2 Managing financial risk. 

3.6.2.3 Sub-Saharan Africa

Statoil's production activities in Sub-Saharan Africa comprise Angola and Nigeria.


Angola

The deep water blocks 17, 15 31 and 4/0531 contributed with 40%36% of Statoil’s equity liquid production outside Norway in 2015.2017. Each block is governed by a production sharing agreement (PSA)PSA which sets out the rights and obligations of the Parties,participants, including mechanisms for sharing of the production with the Angolan state oil company Sonangol.

 

Block 17 comprises has production from four FPSOs; CLOV, Dalia, Girassol and Pazflor.

 

Block 15 has production from four FPSOs: Kizomba A, Kizomba B, Kizomba C-Mondo, and Kizomba C-Saxi Batuque. In April 2015, the Kizomba Satellites phase 2 project, which consists of the fields Bavuka, Kakocha, and Mondo South started production. The fields are developed with subsea wells and infrastructure tied back to the Kizomba B and Mondo FPSO vessels.

 

30Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Block 31 has production from the PSVM FPSO.

 

Statoil had production from the Gimboa FPSO on Block 4/05 until the company exited the Block in September 2015.

The FPSOs serve as production hubs and receiveeach receives oil from more than one field and a large number of wells and more than one field each.wells. In 2015,2017, new wells were added and set into production on Blockblocks 15 Blockand 17 and Block 31..  

 

Nigeria

In Nigeria, Statoil has a 20.2% interest in the Agbami deep water field which is located 110 km off the coast of the Central Niger Delta region. The field is developed with subsea wells connected to an FPSO. The Agbami field straddles the two licenseslicences OML 127 and OML 128 and is operated by Chevron under a Unit Agreement. Statoil has 53.85% interest in OML 128.

For information related to the Agbami redetermination process and the dispute between the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation and the partners in Oil Mining Lease (OML) 128 concerning certain terms of the OML 128 Production Sharing Contract (PSC), see section 5.3 Legal proceedings and note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingencies.contingent assets to the Consolidated financial statements.


Algeria

3.6.2.4 North Africa

Statoil had in 2015 production in North Africa from Algeria.

Algeria

The In Salah onshore gas development in which Statoil has a working interest of 31.85%, is Algeria's third-largest gas development. A PSA including mechanisms for revenue sharing, governs the rights and obligations of the Parties and establishes a joint operatorship between Sonatrach, BP and Statoil.

The Northern fields have been operating since 2004. The In February 2016, the In Salah Gas joint venture announced the introduction of gas in the In Salah Southern Fields processing facilities. Gas export from thefields project started in March. This project,, which ishas been led by Statoil, on behalf of the Joint Venture, will mature the remaining four discoveries into production. The southern started production from two fields (Gour Mahmoud, In Salah, Garet(Garet el Befinat and Hassi Moumene) will tie in toMarch 2016. The remaining two fields (Gour Mahmoud and In Salah) started production in July and November 2017, respectively). The Southern fields are tied back into the Northern fields’ existing facilities in the northern fields.facilities.

  

The In Amenas onshore development is the fourth-largesta gas development in Algeria. It alsowhich contains significant liquid volumes. The In Amenas infrastructure includes a gas processing plant with three trains. The production facility is connected to the Sonatrach distribution system. The facilities are operated through a joint operatorship between Sonatrach, BP and Statoil. The In Amenas Gas Compression project, which was led by BP, came into operation in February 2017. The compressors have made it possible to increase production and thereby utilise the capacity of all three trains.
In December, Statoil where Statoil's shareand the rest of financing the investments (working interest)In Amenas partners secured a licence extension of 5 years beyond 2022. Extension is 45.9%. A PSA,subject to government approval.

Separate PSAs including mechanisms for revenue sharing, governsgovern the rights and obligations of the Parties and establishes aestablish joint operatorshipoperatorships between Sonatrach, BP and Statoil.Statoil for In Salah and In Amenas.

 

Eurasia

TheProduction consists mainly of the output from In Amenas plant has since April 2013 produced from two out of three trains. The production has been relatively stable. The third train, which also was damaged in the January 2013 terrorist attack, is expected to restart in the second quarter of 2016.

Libya

There has not been any oil production from the Mabruk or the Murzuq assets in 2015 due to the security situation in the country.

3.6.2.5 Europe and Asia

Statoil's production in Europe and Asia encompasses Azerbaijan, Russia, the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Azerbaijan

The Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli (ACG) oil field in the Caspian Sea, has production from 6 fixed platforms. The oil is transported through pipelines to the Sangachal onshore terminal near Baku. From the terminal the oil is exported to the world markets.

Statoil has an 8.7% stake in the 1,760 km Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline that is used to transport ACG oil to the southern Turkish port of Ceyhan.

In April 2015, Statoil completed the sale of its remaining 15.5% interest in Shah DenizCorrib gas field off Ireland’s northwest coast, and the South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP) to the MalaysianKharyaga oil and gas company PETRONAS. See note 4Acquisitions and dispositionsof the Consolidated financial statements for further details.

Russia

The Kharyaga oil field is located onshore in the Timan Pechora basin in north-west Russia. The field is governed by a PSA.

For information related to risk in Russia see section 5.1.1 Risks related to our business.

 

United Kingdom

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201531


TheAlbaoil field is located in the central part of the UK North Sea.Jupiteris a gas field located in the southern part of the UK North Sea. The decommissioning of the Jupiter wells is planned to start in 2016.

Ireland

On 30 December 2015 production started on Corrib gas field off Ireland’s northwest coast. Corrib consists of a subsea development with a pipeline to an onshore processing terminal from which gas will be transported to the Irish market. The onshore processing terminal is located approximately 9 km inland.

3.6.3 International exploration

Statoil continued with high international exploration activity in 2015.

In 2015 Statoil carried out significant international exploration activity, as is shown by the company's involvement in 18 completed wells (including both Statoil-operated and partner-operated activities). Eight wells (exploration and appraisal) were announced as discoveries in the period, including the Piri 2, Tangawizi 2 and Mdalasini (Statoil-operated) discoveries in Tanzania.

The table below shows the exploratory wells drilled internationally in the last three years.

 

 

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

North America

- Statoil operated

8

3

7

 

- Partner operated

0

0

4

South America/sub-Saharan Africa

- Statoil operated

3

8

6

 

- Partner operated

5

9

4

North Africa

- Statoil operated

0

0

0

 

- Partner operated

0

0

1

Europe and Asia

- Statoil operated

2

2

0

 

- Partner operated

0

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

18

23

24



The regions where Statoil had exploration activity in 2015 are presented below.

North America

US
Statoil operated five wells in the Gulf of Mexico (Yeti-1, Yeti Side track, Yeti Appraisal, Thorvald-1 and Power Nap). Yeti-1 and its side track were discoveries, Yeti appraisal confirmed the volumes discovered. Power Nap is ongoing at year end.

Statoil has cancelled the contract for the Discoverer Americas rig in December 2015. Statoil was in the current environment unable to secure additional activity for the rig for the remainder of the contract period, ending in May 2016.

Canada
The West Hercules rig arrived in Canada in November 2014, for a 550 days drilling campaign, which continues into early-2016. The programme has focused on appraisal and near field exploration wells in the greater Bay du Nord discovery area, as well as select exploration prospects in the greater Flemish Pass Basin.

Statoil and its partners were the successful bidders for six exploration licences in the Flemish Pass Basin, offshore Newfoundland, and two licences offshore Nova Scotia in East Coast Canada in 2015. Statoil will operate seven of the eight leases awarded.

South America and sub-Saharan Africa

Angola Kwanza
Statoil acquired a solid acreage position in the pre-salt play of the Kwanza Basin in 2011 with the operatorship in Block 38 and 39 and a partner position in Blocks 22, 25 and 40. The work program included eight commitment wells, two Statoil operated and six partner operated. So far six wells have been completed. In 2015 two partner operated wells were drilled, Umbundu in block 40, Catchimanha in Block 22. For more information see note 12
Intangible assets.

Brazil
All exploratory well operations during 2015 were conducted on BM-C-33 license as part of Pão de Açucar and Seat appraisal activities. The Pão de Açucar discovery was fully evaluated by drilling two wells (PdA-A1 and PdA-A2) and performing a successful DST (Drill Stem Test) on

32Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


PdA-A2. The Seat-2 well was re-entered to perform a DST. In agreement with its licence partners, Statoil will assume operatorship of the BM-C-33 licence subject to receiving government approval.

Colombia

Statoil has accessed three licences in 2014, representing access at scale in relatively frontier acreage. In the COL-4 licence, an environmental and social impact study has been completed.

Statoil farmed-in to a 10% equity share in the Tayrona licence and a 20% share in the Gua Off licence in 2014. The Orca-1 well in the Tayrona licence was announced as a gas discovery in 2014.

Mozambique
The 5th licence round was announced during the third quarter of 2015. Statoil together with partners submitted a winning bid in the A5-A block located in the Angoche area. Eni is the operator of the joint venture with 34% participating interest. Statoil’s equity is 25.5%. Final award is expected mid-2016 subject to successful negotiations.

Tanzania

The Tanzania drilling campaign using the Discoverer Americas rig was completed in 2015 after having drilled the Mdalasini prospect and the Tangawizi-2 appraisal well. The discoveries of natural gas in Mdalasini-1, Piri-1 and Giligiliani-1 have significantly increased the total in-place volumes in Block 2.

South Africa

Statoil completed a farm-in transaction in October 2015 with ExxonMobil acquiring a 35% interest in the ER 12/3/154 Tugela South Exploration Right. The Operator is Exxon with 40% equity. The farm-in represents a country entry for Statoil into South Africa. Statoil intends to participate at an early phase of exploration with a step-wise exploration programme.

Nicaragua

In 2015, Statoil together with partner Empresa Nicaraguense del Petroleo (Petronic) has been awarded four licences offshore the Nicaraguan Pacific. Statoil is the operator with 85% equity with the Petronic holding the remaining equity. 2D seismic data has been acquired and processed during 2015 and subsurface studies are underway.

North Africa

Algeria
Statoil and Shell were awarded the Timissit licence in the Berkin basin onshore Algeria in September 2014. Statoil is the operator with 30% equity.

The award represents an opportunity to test a potentially large unconventional (shale) resource play.

The work commitment (up to the first exit point in 2018) is 3D seismic and two vertical wells.


Europe (excluding Norway), Asia and Australia

UK
In 2014 Statoil was awarded interests in 12 exploration licences in the UK 28th licensing round, nine as operator. Significant positions have been taken both in mature parts of the Central North Sea, such as in the vicinity of the Mariner and Bressay projects, and in plays largely untested in UK waters. 11 of the licences are in the North Sea and one is west of the Hebrides. In 2015 two exploration wells were drilled. The Boatswain well in licence P1758 west of the Mariner field was a discovery. The Wall well in licence P2067 was dry. Work now continues to mature the broader UK exploration portfolio.


Greenland

Statoil, along with partners ConocoPhillips and Nunaoil, was awarded block 6 in the East Greenland licence round in December 2013. Statoil is the operator of the block. The licence has a 16-year exploration period.

Russia

Statoil is engaged in a strategic cooperation with Rosneft Oil Company (Rosneft) including a joint cooperation project aimed at undertaking seismic surveys and geological exploration, appraisal, development and production of potential hydrocarbons in four licences on the Russian continental shelf - the Magadan 1, Lisyansky and Kashevarovsky licences in the Sea of Okhotsk (south of the Arctic Circle), and the Perseevsky licence in the Barents Sea (north of the Arctic Circle). Two exploration wells are to be drilled in the Magadan 1 and Lisyansky licences in 2016. Additionally there are two joint cooperation projects onshore; pilot drilling and testing of the onshore heavy oil reservoir layer PK1 in the North Komsomolsky discovery, and the Domanik Sediments Difficult-to-Extract Hydrocarbons Project, aimed at pilot drilling and testing of the limestone Domanik formation in the Russian Volga-Urals basin. For each of these projects, Rosneft holds the majority interest, while Statoil holds a minority interest.

See section 5.1.1 Risks related to our business for information regarding sanctions against Russia.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    33


 

Azerbaijan
The Joint Study Agreement (JSA) with SOCAR forACG licence has in 2017 been extended until the North Absheronend of 2049 through an amended and restated PSA. The ACG New Platform project is an additional production platform in the ACG contract area was completedand work is ongoing to optimise the chosen concept.  

INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION

Statoil reduced exploration drilling activity outside Norway in 2014. Exploration screening2017 and prioritised new access efforts and prospect evaluationmaturation to support an increased drilling activity in 2018 and onwards. 


Brazil is being carried out on an ongoing basisone of Statoil’s core exploration areas. In 2017 Statoil has strengthened its position in the Carcará oil discovery through portfolio transactions and through the second pre-salt offshore licensing round.

In 2017 Statoil has established a position onshore in Argentina in the Neuquén Basin through joint exploration venture with YPF regarding the Bajo del Toro block and through 5th bidding round for Azerbaijan offshore areas in order to identify new access opportunities.Bajo del Toro Este block.

 

IndonesiaIn South-Africa in 2017 Statoil acquired participating interests in two additional offshore frontier blocks, including one operatorship through a transaction with ExxonMobil Exploration and Production South Africa.

Statoil signed the new offshore Aru Trough I PSC licence agreementwas awarded 13 leases in May 2015. The licenceUS Gulf of Mexico in 2017 and is adjacent to Statoil’s existing exploration acreagestrengthening its position in the Aruarea.

In 2017 Statoil has signed agreements to enter two additional offshore exploration licences, Block 59 and West Papua IV licences.60, in the Guyana basin in Suriname. This is in line with our global exploration strategy of accessing early in basins with high exploration potential.

Statoil was awarded six licences, five as operator and one as partner, in the 29th Offshore Licensing Round on the UK continental shelf. These awards are a low-cost access route intoresult of a frontier area withstrategic decision by Statoil to explore in prolific but mature basins. Statoil has drilled four exploration wells in the UK in 2017, resulting in one commercial discovery on Verbier.

After fulfilling the study period work program, Statoil has closed its office in Yangon in Myanmar and relinquished the AD-10 licence, as it now assesses the potential for commercially viable discovery to be low.

Including the four exploration wells drilled and one commercial discovery in the UK in 2017 Statoil and its partners completed 11 exploratory wells and made a total of four commercial discoveries internationally. In 2018 Statoil’s international exploration drilling activity will comprise growth opportunities in basins where Statoil already is already present. This position strengthensestablished with discoveries and producing fields in Brazil, Turkey and the optionalityUK, as well as new frontier opportunities such as Argentina. Statoil expects to complete 8 to 10 exploration wells internationally in Statoil’s long-term portfolio and secures potential upsides from existing exploration acreage.2018.

 

 

Exploratory wells drilled1)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

 

 

Statoil operated

2

5

8

Partner operated

4

2

2

Africa

 

 

 

Statoil operated

0

0

3

Partner operated

0

0

3

Other regions

 

 

 

Statoil operated

4

0

2

Partner operated

1

2

0

Total (gross)

11

9

18

 

 

 

 

1) Wells completed during the year, including appraisals of earlier discoveries.

Myanmar

FIELDS UNDER DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONALLY

This section covers all the sanctioned projects.

Statoil and ConocoPhillips were awarded one exploration block (AD-10)

Americas

USA
The Stampede oil field (Statoil 25%, Hess operator) is located in the Myanmar watersGreen Canyon area of the BayGulf of Bengal in 2014. A production sharing contract was signed in May 2015. Statoil (as operator) has completed the IEE (Initial Environmental Examination) and has set up a country office in Yangon.

Mexico. The development

34   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Australia

In the Ceduna sub-basin in the Great Australian Bight, Statoil holds 30% interest in four exploration licences with BP as operator.

In October 2014, Statoil obtained 100% equity share in an exploration licence in the Exmouth Plateau in North Carnarvon basin.

New Zealand

Statoil is operator with 100% equity share in petroleum exploration permits 55781 and 57057 in the Reinga Basin offshore Northland’s west coast. The licences were awarded in the New Zealand Block Offer 2013 and 2014 respectively.

The work programme is designed to fully evaluate the prospectivity of the licences in a step-wise manner within the 15-year licence time frame. Statoil completed 2D seismic data early 2015. Following an analysis and interpretation of this data, Statoil will decide whether to enter into the second exploration phase by mid-2017.

In the New Zealand Block Offer 2014 Statoil was also awarded 50% working interest in blocks 57083, 57085 and 57087 with Chevron as operator. The licences are located in the East Coast and Pegasus basins, southeast off New Zealand’s North Island. The partnership is committed to acquire 2D seismic and 3D seismic within the first exploration period.

Faroe Islands

Following disappointing exploration activities, Statoil have relinquished all licences. The Statoil office in Torshavn closed down in 2015.

3.6.4 Fields under development internationally

The sanctioned development projects in which DPI is involved are in Algeria, Brazil, Canada, the UK, and the US.

This section covers selected projects under development and significant pre-sanctioned projects.

Sanctioned projects

Operator

Statoil's equity share

Time of sanctioning

Production start

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US: Julia

Exxon Mobil

50.00%

2013

2016

 

US: Heidelberg

Anadarko

12.00%

2013

2016

 

US: Stampede

Hess

25.00%

2014

2018

 

US: Big foot

Chevron

27.50%

2010

2018

 

Canada: Hebron

Exxon Mobil

9.01%

2012

2017

 

Algeria: In Amenas Compression project

Sonatrach/BP/Statoil

45.90%

2010

2016

 

UK, Mariner

Statoil

65.11%

2012

2018

 

Brazil, Peregrino Phase II1)

Statoil

60.00%

2015

2019/20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Statoil made the investment decision on Peregrino Phase II project in December 2014 and submitted the Plan of Development to Brazilian authorities in January 2015.

 

3.6.4.1 North America

Statoil has a number of significant ongoing development projects in North America.

US Gulf of Mexico

The Julia oil field is located in the Walker Ridge area of the Gulf of Mexico near Jack and St Malo, and will be developed with subsea wells tied back to the shared JSM host facility. First oil is expected within mid-2016.

The Heidelberg oil field is located in the Green Canyon area. The development includes a Spar facility and first oil is expected within early-2016.

The Stampede oil field is located in the Green Canyon area. The development includes a tension-leg platform (TLP) with downhole gas lift and water injection from start of production. FirstIn May, the offshore platform was successfully installed. The preparations for start-up of production progressed: subsea work was completed and all three wells were ready at year end 2017. Production commenced with first oil in January 2018

TVEX (Statoil 25%, Chevron operator) is an extension to Tahiti field, targeting shallower reservoirs above the existing main Tahiti reservoir, which is located in the Green Canyon area of the Gulf of Mexico. Start of production is expected in the fourth quarter of 2018.

 

The Big foot Foot oil field (Statoil 27.5%, Chevron operator) is located in Walker Ridge area.area of the Gulf of Mexico. The development includes a dry tree TLP with a drilling rig. The operator Chevron expects first oil from Big Foot in 2018. Initial plans called for production to start in late 2015, however,project’s offshore installation was halted andcompleted on March 2018. First oil estimated date is during the TLP moved to sheltered waters following damage to subsea installation tendons in late May 2015second half of 2018.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201535


US Onshore

US Onshore operations use hydraulic fracturing to liberaterecover resources. Despite reduction in investment and activity level in recent years in shale plays Bakken, Eagle Ford and MarcellusAppalachian Basin (Marcellus and Utica), productionproduction growth continues. The increase in onshore production despite investment reduction is mainly attributed to higher recovery per well due to enhanced completion and improved operational efficiency.

Brazil

Peregrino phase II (Statoil 60%, operator) includes the Peregrino South and Southwest discoveries. The development consists of one wellhead platform tied back to the existing floating production, storage and offloading vessel. Project execution started in April 2016. In September 2016, the plan for development was formally approved by the Brazilian national agency of petroleum, natural gas and biofuels (ANP). Production is expected to start in late 2020.

EurasiaS
United Kingdom

ee section 3.6.2.1 North AmericaMariner (Statoil 65.11%, operator) for further information.is a heavy oil development in the UK. The field development includes a production, drilling and living quarter platform based on a steel jacket. Oil will be exported by offshore loading from a floating storage unit. The development includes a possible future subsea tie-in of Mariner East, a small heavy oil discovery. Mariner topsides were successfully installed in August 2017, and offshore hook-up and commissioning is currently ongoing. Production from Mariner is expected to start in second half of 2018.



DISCOVERIES WITH POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

This section covers selected pre-sanction projects.

 

Canada

Americas

USA
The
Hebron fieldVito project (Statoil 37%, Shell operator) is locateda light weight semi-submersible platform with a single eight-well subsea manifold, in the Jeanne d'Arc basin offshore Newfoundland nearMississippi Canyon area of the partner-operated producing fields Terra Nova, HiberniaGulf of Mexico. The deep wells (32,000 feet) will have down hole gas lift to assist the production. Production is estimated to start by the end of the second quarter of 2021. In April 2017, its concept development and Hibernia Southern Extension. The Hebron field will be developed using a fixed gravity base structure (GBS) and first oil is expected in 2017. Effective January 1, 2016, Statoil’s interest in Hebron selectionwas reduced from 9.7% to 9.0% due to a redetermination process.approved.

 

Canada

Statoil has made oil discoveries in the Flemish Pass offshore Newfoundland comprising the Bay du Nord project (Statoil 65%, operator), and work is on-goingongoing to assess options for developing this project. Bay du Nord.

Brazil

Statoil is operator with 35% equity interest in licence BM-C-33 in the Campos basin. We are evaluating options for developing the discoveries in the licence.

The pre-salt oil discovery Carcará straddles block BM-S-8 and the Carcara North block in the Santos basis. In 2017 Statoil obtained a 40% interest in Carcara Northand Statoil has 76% interest in BM-S-8. Statoil has announced agreements to reduce its interest in BM-S-8 to 36.5% and Statoil will be the operator of Bay du Nordboth Carcara North and holdsBM-S-8 for a 65% working interest.unitised field development. Closing of these transactions and unitization of the field is subject to government approval. This, together with the announced agreement with Petrobras to acquire 25% in the producing oil field Roncadorin the Campos basin, will strengthen our position in Brazil, one of Statoil’s core areas due to its large resource base and excellent fit with our technology and capabilities

Africa

Tanzania

3.6.4.2 South America

In January 2015 Statoil submitted the Plan of Development (PoD) for Peregrino Phase II project in Brazil.

In December 2014, Statoil approved the investment decision for the development of the second phase of the Peregrino oil field. In January 2015 the PoD was submitted to the Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP) for approval. Peregrino Phase II project includes the Peregrino South and South West discoveries. The development consists of one wellhead platform tied back to the existing FPSO.

3.6.4.3 Sub-Saharan Africa

In Sub-Saharan Africa, Statoil is participating in the planning and development of Block 2 in Tanzania.

Tanzania

Statoil has made several large gas discoveries in Block 2 (Statoil 65%, operator) offshore Tanzania. Statoil during 2012-2015. The licence is located in the operatorIndian Ocean 100 km off the southern part of Block 2 and holds a 65% working interest.Tanzania. Work is on-goingongoing to assess options for developing the


discoveries, including the construction of an onshore LNG plant jointly with the co-venturers in Blocks 1 3 and 4 which are operated by BG.Shell Tanzania.

Eurasia
Russia

3.6.4.4 North Africa

In 2015, Statoil's field developments inSeptember 2017, Rosneft and Statoil signed the shareholders and operating agreement (SOA) for the North Africa were in Algeria.

Komsomolskoye project. The InAmenas Gas Compression project in Algeria, which is led by BP, was sanctioned in late 2010. The compressors are expected to come on stream in the fourth quarter of 2016. Thisparties will make it possible to reduce wellhead pressure and maintain plateau production. The In Amenas facilities are operated throughestablish a joint operatorship between Sonatrach, BP and Statoil.

In February 2016, the In Salah GasRussian limited joint venture announcedcompany where Statoil will own 33.33%. North Komsomolskoye is a conventional, but complex viscous oil field located onshore Western Siberia in Russia. Statoil and Rosneft have agreed to start test production in North Komsomolskoye with the start- up of operations ataim to better understand the In Salah Southern Fields projectreservoir and lay the ground for a potential future full field development decision. For information about risks related to our activity in Algeria. For more informationRussia see section 3.6.2.4 North Africa2.11 Risk review under Risks related to our business.

  

3.6.4.5 Europe and Asia

In Europe and Asia, Statoil is participating in the planning and development of projects in the UK

United Kingdom

Statoil is the operator for the Mariner heavy oil project. In December 2012, Statoil made the investment decision to develop the Mariner oil field. The field development plan was approved by the UK authorities in February 2013. The concept selected includes a production, drilling and quarters platform based on a steel jacket, with a floating storage unit. Statoil expects production start in 2018.

The field development plan for Mariner includes a possibility of a future subsea tie-in of Mariner East, a small heavy oil discovery. Statoil is the operator of Mariner East.

Following completion of the farm down of 20.89% of P.726 (Mariner East) and 28.89% of P.979 (Mariner South) by Statoil to JX Nippon in third quarter 2015, Statoil holds a 65.11% interest in all Mariner licences.

36   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Statoil is the operator for, and holds an 81.6% interest in 2.5 MMP - MARKETING, MIDSTREAM & PROCESSINGBressay. Bressay is also a heavy oil discovery. In February 2016, Statoil decided to pause the concept selection work on Bressay.

In November 2015, Statoil completed the purchase of First Oil’s 24% equity share in the UK continental shelf (UKCS) licence P312. This UK licence and licence PL046 on the NCS comprise the Alfa Sentral, a gas and condensate field planned to be developed as a tie-back to the existing Sleipner infrastructure on the NCS. A pre unit agreement is in place between the UKCS and NCS Alfa Sentral Licenses, with an unitisation agreement to be negotiated prior to the investment decision.

In February 2016, Statoil signed an agreement with Talisman Sinopec North Sea Limited to acquire their 31% interest in the UK Alfa Sentral Licence P312. The transaction is pending government approval. The transaction will increase Statoil’s ownership interest from 24% to 55% when completed. JX remains the operator with a 45% interest.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201537


3.7 Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP)



 

3.7.1 MMP overview

The Marketing, Midstream and& Processing (MMP) reporting segment is responsible for marketing, trading, processing and tradingtransporting of crude oil and condensate, natural gas, gas liquids,NGL and refined products, for transportation and processingincluding operation of commodities and for operation ofStatoil operated refineries, terminals and processing plantsplants. In addition, MMP is responsible for power and emissions trading and for developing transportation solutions for natural gas, liquids and crude oil from Statoil assets including pipelines, shipping, trucking and rail. The business activities within MMP are organised in the following business clusters: Marketing and Trading, Asset Management and Processing and Manufacturing.

 

MMP marketshandles Statoil's own volumes,and the Norwegian state's direct financial interest (SDFI) equity production of crude oil and NGL, and third-party volumes,volumes. This represents approximately 50% of all Norwegian liquids exports. MMP is also responsible for marketing Statoil’s and SDFI’s gas. In total, Statoil is responsible for marketing together with third-party gas. This represents approximately 70% of all Norwegian gas exports. See sections 3.12.3 Thethe Norwegian State’sstate’s participation and 3.12.4 SDFI oil and gas marketing and sale for further details regarding the Norwegian state’s direct financial interest.

MMP operates two refineries, two gas processing plants, one LNG plant (from 1 January 2016), one methanol plantin Applicable laws and three crude oil terminals. In addition, MMP is responsible for developing transportation solutions for natural gas, liquids and crude oil from the Statoil assets including pipelines, shipping, trucking and rail.

In 2015, MMP sold 36.9 billion cubic metres (bcm) of natural equity gas from the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) on our own behalf,regulations in addition to approximately 37.2bcm of NCS gas on behalf of the Norwegian state. Statoil's total US gas sales, including third-party gas, amounted to 11.2 bcm in 2015. In 2015, MMP also sold 644 million barrels of crude oil and condensate, approximately 15 million tonnes of natural gas liquids (NGL), and approximately 1.2 million tonnes of methanol. Of the total 644 million barrels sold in 2015, approximately 50% represented Statoil equity volumes, while approximately 37% of the total 15 million tonnes of NGL sold in 2015 were Statoil equity volumes.

In 2015 the European gas market was characterised by falling prices due to record supplies and stagnating demand. Statoil’s overall gas production increased somewhat compared to 2014.In the US the cold winter in North East US and Canada created large regional arbitrage margins. The LNG market showed continued regional price differences and geographical arbitrage margins. An oversupplied oil market globally has resulted in weak oil prices in 2015.section 2.7 Corporate.

 

Refinery margins were higher than in 2014. Facilities have been operated with good regularity. HSE results are at the same level as in 2014 for Serious Incident Frequency (SIF) and Total Recordable Incident Frequency (TRIF), while there has been an increase in number of oil and gas leakages mainly due technical and operational issues. With effect from 1 June 2015, the Renewable Energy business cluster was transferred from MMP to New Energy Solutions (NES). The remaining business activities are organised in the following business clusters: Marketing and Trading; Asset Management and Processing and Manufacturing.

Key events in 2015:

·The operatorship for Azerbaijan Gas Supply Company and the commercial operatorship for South Caucasus Pipeline Company were transferred from Statoil to The State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) effective from 1 May 2015 following the completion of the sale of Statoil’s shares to SOCAR, BP and PETRONAS in 2014

·Following the divestment of its share in the Shah Deniz gas field in Azerbaijan, Statoil agreed to sell its 20% interest in Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG (TAP) to the Italian gas infrastructure company Snam

·Edvard Grieg oil pipeline and Utsira High gas pipeline became operational late 2015 and provide export of oil and gas for the Edvard Grieg field and in the future also for the Ivar Aasen field currently under construction2017:

·          The 482 kilometer long Polarled pipelineexport of Statoil piped gas was laidrecord high at the Aasta Hansteen field41.0 bcm

·Decision to phase out combined heat and power plant at a depth of 1,260 metersMongstad was made in the Norwegian SeaFebruary

·          Statoil signed an agreement with Centrica in May to increase the volume of gas supplies under an existing supply agreement.awarded long-term contracts for two offshore loading shuttle tankers and two LPG carriers. The gas supplied to the UK from the ten year agreementfuel efficiency features built into these vessels will increase from 5 bcm/year to 7.3 bcm/year from October 2015reduce operational costs and climate emissions

·          Statoil extendedPolarled pipeline was commissioned in May and will transport gas supply agreement with UK’s SSE. Starting 1 October 2015, the gas supplied from the six year agreement will increase from approximately 0.5 bcm/year to approximately 2.5 bcm/year

The profitability of our industry continues to be challenged. Statoil’s responseNCS to the industrial challenge characterised by escalating costNyhamna gas processing plant, which has been upgraded to process and declining returns is addressed in export the Section Strategy and market overview. new volumes

38Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


3.7.2 Marketing and Trading

The Marketing and Trading business cluster (MT) is responsible for the marketing and trading of all the products from Statoil’s upstream, processing and refining business.

  

3.7.2.1 Marketing and trading of gas and LNG

MMP is responsible for Statoil's marketing and trading of natural gas worldwide, for power and emissions trading and for overall gas supply planning and optimisation, including the SFDI.

TheStatoil’s gas marketing and trading business is conducted from Norway (Stavanger) and from offices in Belgium, the UK, Germany, the USA and Singapore.

Europe

The major export markets for gas from the NCS are Germany, France, the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain. LNG from the Snøhvit field, combined with third party LNG cargoes, allow Statoil to reach global gas markets. The majority of gas is sold to counterparties through bilateral sales agreements and the US.

Statoil transports and markets approximately 70% ofremaining volumes are sold over the trading desk through all NCS gas and continues to develop its position in the US.

A significant proportion of Statoil's gasmain European trading hubs. The bilateral sales are sold under long-term contracts. These sales aremainly carried out with large industrial customers, power producers and local distribution companies. Gas is also sold through short-term contracts and through trading on European and US liquid marketplaces. In the US, gas is sold through bilateral contracts.

A few of Statoil’s long-term gas contracts contain contractual price review mechanisms that can be triggered by the buyer or seller at regular intervals, or under certain given circumstances. as regulated by the contracts. For the ongoing price-reviews, Statoil provides in its financial statements for probable liabilities based on Statoil’s best judgement. For further information, see Note 23 to the Consolidated financial statements.

Statoil is currently in price reviews with some of its customers.

active on both physical and exchange markets such as the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). Statoil expects to continue to optimise the market value of the gas delivered to Europevolumes through a mix of long-termbilateral contracts and short-term marketing and trading. This is done both as a response to customer needs and in order to capture new business opportunities as the markets become more liberalised and liquid. Statoil has flexibility in terms oftrading via its production and transportation systems. Combined with itssystems and downstream assets this is used to optimise the value of the gas sold.assets.

 

EuropeUSA

The major export markets for gas from the NCS are Germany, France, the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy and Spain. Our longer term customers include large national or regional gas companies such as ENGIE, ENI Gas & Power, British Gas Trading (a subsidiary of Centrica), RWE and GasTerra.

Our European gas trading business conducts activities with over 85 counterparties on all European liquid trading locations. MMP is active on both physical and exchange markets such as Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).

US 

The US is the world's largest and most liquid gas market. Statoil Natural Gas LLC (SNG), a wholly-owned subsidiary, has a gas marketing and trading organizationorganisation in Stamford, Connecticut that markets natural gas to local distribution companies, industrial customers and power generators.

SNG also markets the gas equity production volumes from Statoil's assets in the US Gulf of Mexico.

Statoil's entry into the MarcellusMexico, Eagle Ford and the Eagle Ford shale gas plays has resulted in a significant increase in the volume of gas marketedAppalachian Basin and traded by Statoil in the US over the last few years.

SNG has entered into gas transportation agreements which enable Statoil to transporttransports some of the produced gas from the Northern MarcellusAppalachian production area to Manhattan, NYNew York City and to the US/Canadian border at Niagara, providing access to the greater Toronto area in Canada.area.

In addition, SNG has long-term capacity contracts with Dominion Resources Inc., which ownsat the Cove Point LNG re-gasification terminal, in Maryland, with a total capacitythat enables sourcing of 10.4 bcm per year. LNG is sourced from the Snøhvit LNG facility in Norway. Due to continuing low gas prices in the US mostcompared to global LNG prices over the last years, almost all of Statoil's LNG cargoes have been diverted away from the US and delivered into higher-pricedhigher priced markets in Europe, South-America and Asia.

 

Algeria

Statoil has a participating interest in the In Salah gas field, Algeria's third-largest gas development. The field is operated by a joint venture constituted by Statoil, BP and Sonatrach. Statoil receives its income from gas which is sold under long-term contracts.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201539


3.7.2.2 Marketing and trading of liquids

MMP is responsible for the sale of the group'sStatoil's and the Norwegian state's direct financial interest (SDFI) production ofSDFI’s crude oil and natural gas liquids.

StatoilNGL, in addition to commercial optimisation of the refineries and terminals. The liquids marketing and trading business is amongconducted from Norway, the world's major net sellers of crude oil. The company operates from sales offices in Stavanger, Oslo, London,UK, Singapore, Stamfordthe US and Calgary and markets and trades crude oil, condensate, NGLs as well as refined products.

Canada. The main crude oil market for Statoil is northwest Europe. Most of the crude oil volumes are sold in the spot market, based

Statoil, Annual Report on publicly quoted market prices.Form 20-F 201737


The liquids marketing and trading business is responsible for commercial optimisation of the Mongstad and Kalundborg refineries as well as crude terminals located at Mongstad, Sture and South Riding Point in the Bahamas. MMP is also responsible for Statoil's liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) liftings at the Sture terminal, as well as Statoil's naphtha lifting from Kårstø and Braefoot Bay, liftings of LPG from Kårstø, Mongstad, Braefoot Bay and Teesside terminals in addition to marketing of condensate and LPG from the In Amenas field In Algeria. Statoil lifts waterborne ethane from Kårstø and Teesside, condensate from Nyhamna, and condensate and LPG volumes from Melkøya.

In addition, MMP markets equity crude oil, condensate and NGL production from Statoil's unconventional assets in North America. They include the Alberta oil sands, Bakken, Eagle Ford, and Marcellus. Unconventional volumes were mostly sold in the spot market based on publicly quoted prices. Production from Eagle Ford is primarily transported by pipeline while the most part of crude oil from Bakken is transported to the best paying markets by rail.

MMP also markets equity volumes from DPIE&P International assets located in Canada, the US, Brazil, Angola, Nigeria, Algeria, Russia, Azerbaijan and the UK, as well as third party volumes.

Value is maximised through the usemarketing, physical and financial trading and through optimisation of own and leased capacity such as refineries, processing, terminals, storages, pipelines, railcars and vessels.

  

3.7.3 Asset ManagementManufacturing

The Asset Management business cluster (AM) is the owner of all mid- and downstream assets in Statoil ranging from refineries to pipelines, storage terminals, shipping activities and other infrastructure lease commitments.

AM is responsible for securing flow assurance for gas and oil in order to bring production to the markets. This includes management and development of existing assets and contracts as well as being responsible for Statoil’s mid and downstream investment projects. Furthermore AM ensures that the Marketing and Trading business cluster (MT) has efficient access to assets for trading purposes.

3.7.3.1 Production plants

AM is the owner of Statoil`s two refineries in Norway and Denmark and a combined heat and power plant in Norway. AM manages Statoil`s majority ownership share of a methanol production plant, as well as Statoil`s minority share in an NGL and condensate processing facility.

Mongstad

Statoil holds 100% ownershipowns and is operator of the Mongstad refinery in Norway. The refinery was built in 1975,Norway including the Mongstad Heat and significantly expanded and upgraded in the late 1980s. In addition it has been subject to considerable investments over the last 15 years in order to meet new product specifications and to improve energy efficiencyPower Plant (MHPP). The refinery is a medium-sized, modernmedium sized refinery built in 1975, with a crude oil and condensate distillation capacity of 226,000 barrels per day.

The refinery is directly linked to offshore fields through two crude oil pipelines, through a natural gas liquids (NGL)/condensate pipeline to the crude oil terminal at Sture and the gas processing plant at Kollsnes through an NGL/condensate pipeline, and to Kollsnes by a gas pipeline to Kollsnes, making it an attractive site for landing and processing of hydrocarbons.

In addition to the refinery, the main facilities at Mongstad consist of a crude oil terminal (Mongstad terminal), an NGL processing unit and terminal (Vestprosess), and a combinedpipeline. MHPP produces heat and power from gas received from Kollsnes and from the refinery. It has capacity of approximately 280 megawatts of electric power and 350 megawatts of process heat. Following termination of the existing gas agreement between the Troll licence and Statoil Refining Norway AS, the normal operation of the power plant (Mongstad Heat and Power Plant).will be phased out.

 

Statoil ownshas an ownership interest of 34% ofin Vestprosess, which transports and processes NGL and condensate. The Vestprosess pipeline connects the Kollsnes and Sture plants to Mongstad. The NGLOperatorship of Vestprosess is fractionated in the Vestprosess NGL unittransferred to produce naphtha, propane and butane.

40Gassco 1 January 2018, with Statoil Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015as technical service provider.


 

Statoil is the owner of Mongstad Heat and Power Plant, which produces electrical heat and power from gas received from Kollsnes and from the refinery. The combined heat and power plan started commercial operation in 2010 and improved the Mongstad refinery's energy efficiency. It has a capacity of approximately 280 megawatts of electric power and 350 megawatts of process heat.

Kalundborg

Statoil holds 100% ownershipowns and is operator of the Kalundborg refinery in Denmark, which has a crude oil and condensate distillation capacity of 108,000 barrels per day. The Kalundborg refinery is a small, carbon dioxide efficient and flexible oil refinery. While this enables it to produce a variety of products, its main products are low-sulphur gasoline and diesel for markets in Denmark and Sweden. The refinery is connected via one gasoline and one gas oil pipeline to the terminal at Hedehusene near Copenhagen, and most of its products are sold locally.

Tjeldbergodden

TheStatoil has an ownership interest of 82% in the methanol plant at Tjeldbergodden, the largest in Europe,Tjeldbergodden. It receives natural gas from the Heidrun field in the Norwegian Sea through the Haltenpipe pipeline. Statoil has an ownership interest of 82,0% in Statoil Metanol ANS at Tjeldbergodden. In addition, Statoil holds a 50.9% ownership interest in the air separation unit Tjeldbergodden Luftgassfabrikk DA, which is one of the largest air separation units (ASU) in Scandinavia.DA.

 

The following table shows operating statistics for the plants at Mongstad, Kalundborg and Tjeldbergodden.

 

Throughput1)

Distillation capacity2)

On stream factor %3)

Utilisation rate %4)

Refinery

2017

2016

2015

2017

2016

2015

2017

2016

2015

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mongstad

12.1

9.8

11.9

9.3

9.3

9.3

97.5

94.4

97.6

94.7

93.9

93.4

Kalundborg

5.5

5.0

5.2

5.4

5.4

5.4

99.7

98.0

98.5

90.4

91.0

91.0

Tjeldbergodden

0.94

0.76

0.92

0.95

0.95

0.95

99.4

94.8

98.5

99.4

94.8

98.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Actual throughput of crude oils, condensates, NGL, feed and blendstock, measured in million tonnes.

Throughput may be higher than distillation capacity for plants because volumes of fuel oil, NGL, kero, naphta, gasoil and bio-diesel additive may not go through the crude-/condensate distillation unit.

2)

Nominal crude oil and condensate distillation capacity, and methanol production capacity, measured in million tonnes.

3)

Composite reliability factor for all processing units, excluding turnarounds.

4)

Composite utilisation rate for all processing units, based on throughput and capacity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7.3.2 Terminals and storage


AM has ownership in two crude oil terminals in Norway. AM also operates the South Riding Point crude oil terminal in the Bahamas.

Mongstad terminal

Statoil has a 65% ownership interest in Mongstad crude oil terminal, while the State holds 35%.terminal. Crude oil is landed at Mongstad via twothrough pipelines from Trollthe NCS and by crude tankers from the market. The Mongstad terminal has a storage capacity of 9.4 million barrels of crude oil. The terminal supports Statoil's global trading, blending and trans-shipment of crude. It is an important tool in the marketing of North Sea crude.

Sture terminal

The Sture crude oil terminal receives crude oil via twothrough pipelines from the Oseberg and Grane areas in the North Sea. The terminal is part of the Oseberg Transportation System (Statoil interest 36.2%). The processing facilities at Sture stabilise Oseberg crude oil and recover LPG mix (propane and butane) and naphtha. Oseberg blend, Grane blend and LPG mix are exported. LPG and naphtha are also transported through the Vestprosess pipeline to Mongstad.

South Riding Point terminal

AMStatoil operates the South Riding Point Terminal, which is located on Grand Bahamas Island and consists of two shipping berths and ten storage tanks, of crude oil, with a storage capacity of 6.75 million barrels of crude oil. The terminal has been upgradedfacilities to also enable the blending ofblend crude oils, including heavy oils. The blendingSouth Riding Point terminal was hit by Hurricane Matthew in 2016 with extensive damage to the Sea Island and the offshore berth unloading/loading facility. The reconstruction work is carried out onshore and from shipexpected to ship at the jetty. The terminal is intended to both support our global trading activity and improve our handling capacity for heavy oils. The terminal is an integral part of our marketing of equity volumes of heavy oil.be finalised in 2018.

Aldbrough Gas Storage

Statoil UK holds one third share of the interests in the Aldbrough Gas Storage in UK, which is operated by SSE Hornsea Ltd. At the end of 2015 six out of nine caverns were operational.

Etzel Gas Lager

Statoil Deutschland Storage GmbH holds a 23.7% stake in the Etzel Gas Lager in Norththe northern part of Germany which has a total of nineteen19 caverns and secures regularity for gas deliveries from the NCS.

Teesside terminal

38Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil UK holds a 27.3% stake in the Teesside terminal, which stabilises unstable oil from the Ekofisk area and several other Norwegian and UK fields and recovers NGL.

 




3.7.3.3 Pipelines

AM is responsible for Statoil’s ownership in pipelines globally as well as gathering and initial processing in the US.

Pipelines in operations

Statoil is a significant shipper in the NCS gas pipeline system. This network links gas fields on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) with processing plants on the Norwegian mainland and with terminals at six landing points located in France, Germany, Belgium and the UK.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201541


The total length of Norway's gas pipelines is currently 8,100 kilometres, and mostMost gas pipelines on the NCS that are accessed by third-party customers are owned by a single joint venture, Gassled, with regulated third-party access. The Gassled system is operated by the independent system operator Gassco AS, which is wholly owned by the Norwegian state. When new gas infrastructure facilities are merged into Gassled, the ownership interests are adjusted to reflect each owner's relative interest. Hence, Statoil's future ownership interest in Gassled may change. AM is managing Statoil’s current 5% ownership share in Gassled.Gassled is 5%. See Gas sales and transportation from the NCS in section 2.7 Corporate for further information.

 

Statoil is the technical service provider (TSP) for the Kårstø and Kollsnes gas processing plants in accordance with the technical service agreement between Statoil and Gassco AS, included as Exhibit 4(a)(i) to Form 20-F. Statoil also performs the TSP role for the majority of the Gassco operated gas pipeline infrastructure.

In addition, AM manageMMP manages Statoil’s ownership in the following pipelines in the Norwegian gas transportation system: Oseberg oil transportation system, Grane oil pipeline, Kvitebjørn oil pipeline, Troll oil pipeline I and II, Edvard Grieg oil pipeline, Utsira High gas pipeline,, Valemon rich gas pipeline and the Haltenpipe,Norpipe and Mongstad gas pipeline.

 

Statoil Deutschland GmbH indirect holdsa 30.8% stake 30.1% interest in the Norddeutche Erdgas Transversale (NETRA) overlandNyhamna gas transmission pipeline.processing plant in Aukra via the recently established Nyhamna Joint Venture. The venture is operated by Gassco.

Pipelines under construction

Statoil is the operator and holds a 37.1% ownership share in theThe Polarled project which will secure a gas export pipeline forconnects fields in the Norwegian Sea. The project is alignedSea with the Nyhamna gas processing plant. Transportation through the pipeline will commence at Aasta Hansteen field development.production start. Statoil transferred the operatorship for the Polarled pipeline to Gassco on 1 May 2017.

Statoil is the operator and holds a 40% ownership share in the

The Johan Sverdrup oil and gas pipelines. Theexport pipelines are under construction and will provide oil and gas export forfrom the Johan Sverdrup field and is scheduled to start-up in 2019.field.

In the fourth quarter of 2015 Statoil entered into an agreement with Snam to sell our 20% interest in the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP). See note 4 Acquistitions and dispositions for further details.

US gathering system

AM is responsible for Statoil’s participation in gathering and facilities for initial processing of oil and gas in the Bakken, Eagle Ford and Marcellus assets in the US. This includes crude and natural gas gathering systems, fresh water supply systems, salt water disposal wells, oil and gas treatment and processing facilities to provide flow assurance for Statoil’s upstream production. Midstream assets in Bakken are owned and operated 100% by Statoil. In Eagle Ford, Statoil will transition to operator for 100% of the midstream assets outside of the Oak, Karnes, DeWitt and Bee (KDB) area with a working interest of 63%. In the KDB area of Eagle Ford, Statoil has an ownership interest of 25.2% in Edwards Lime Gathering LLC, which is operated by Energy Transfer Partners L.P. For Marcellus Statoil has operated assets in Marcellus South while in the Marcellus non-operated areas both in the North and South, Statoil’s working interest ranges from 16.25% to 32.5% depending on gathering system and number of JV partners.

3.7.4 Processing and Manufacturing

The Processing and Manufacturing business cluster (PM) is responsible for the operation of all of Statoil's onshore facilities in Norway and Denmark except for Snøhvit related facilities, and a substantial part of the oil and gas pipelines on the NCS.

This includes the following Statoil operated plants and pipelines: The refineries at Mongstad and Kalundborg, the methanol production plant at Tjeldbergodden, Oseberg transportation system including the Sture Terminal, Vestprosess, Mongstad Terminal, the Grane, Kvitebjørn, Troll and Edvard Grieg oil pipelines and Mongstad gas pipeline.

The following table shows operating statistics for the plants at Mongstad, Kalundborg and Tjeldbergodden.

 

Throughput1)

Distillation capacity2)

On stream factor %3)

Utilisation rate %4)

Refinery

2015

2014

2013

2015

2014

2013

2015

2014

2013

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mongstad

 11.9  

 9.2  

 11.8  

 9.3  

 9.3  

 9.3  

 97.6  

 93.4  

 98.9  

 93.4  

 90.0  

 95.0  

Kalundborg

 5.2  

 4.5  

 5.0  

 5.4  

 5.4  

 5.4  

 98.5  

 91.8  

 98.2  

 91.0  

 82.0  

 86.5  

Tjeldbergodden

0.92

0.83

0.79

0.95

0.95

0.95

 98.5  

 88.4  

 94.4  

 98.5  

 97.1  

 96.6  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Actual throughput of crude oils, condensates, NGL, feed and blendstock, measured in million tonnes.

Higher than distillation capacity for Mongstad due to high volumes of fuel oil and NGL not going through the crude distillation unit.

Higher than distillation capacity for Kalundborg, due to volumes of kero, naphta, gasoil and biodiesel-additive not going through the crude-/condensate units.

2)

Nominal crude oil and condensate distillation capacity, and methanol production capacity, measured in million tonnes.

3)

Composite reliability factor for all processing units, excluding turnarounds.

4)

Composite utilisation rate for all processing units, stream day utilisation.

 

  

In addition PM performs the role of technical service provider (TSP) for the Kårstø and Kollsnes gas processing plants in accordance with the technical service agreement between Statoil and the operator Gassco. PM also performs the TSP role for the larger share of the Gassco operated gas pipeline infrastructure.

42Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The processing that takes place at Kollsnes involves separating out the NGL, and compressing the dry gas for export via the Gassled pipeline network to receiving terminals in Europe. The Kollsnes plant was initially developed to receive gas from the Troll field. Kollsnes now also receives gas from the Visund, Kvitebjørn and Fram fields.

Kårstø processes rich gas and condensate from the NCS received via the Statpipe pipeline, the Åsgard Transport pipeline and the Sleipner condensate pipeline. Products produced at Kårstø include ethane, propane, iso-butane, normal butane, naphtha and stabilised condensate. The dry gas is transported to customers through the Gassled pipeline network via receiving terminals in Europe.

As of 1 January 2016 responsibility for operation of Snøhvit onshore facilities has been transferred from DPN to MMP.

For further information about Statoil's operated onshore facilities and pipelines see section 3.7.3 Asset Management.  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    4339


 

3.8 Other Group2.6

OTHER GROUP

The Other reporting segment includes activities in New Energy Solutions (NES), Global Strategy and& Business Development (GSB), Technology, Projects and& Drilling (TPD) and corporate staffs and support functions.

 

3.8.1 New Energy Solutions (NES)

The NES business area reflects Statoil’s aspirations to gradually complement its oil and gas portfolio with profitable renewable energy and other low-carbon energy solutions. Offshore wind, solar and carbon capture and storage have been key strategic focus areas in 2015.2017.

 

In February 2016, Statoil launched a new energy investment fund dedicated to investingAs per end of 2017, Statoil’s share of the offshore wind production capacity is around 290 megawatt (MW) in attractiveproduction and ambitious growth companies in renewable energy, supporting its strategy of growth in new energy solutions. The new fund, Statoil Energy Ventures, will invest up to USD 200 million over a period of four to seven years.around 190 MW under development.

 

Key events in 2015:

·In October Statoil made a final investment decision to build the world’s first floating offshore wind park: The Hywind pilot park, to be located outside Peterhead in Scotland2017:

·          In June Statoil announced that that it would establish NES as a new business area to create new profitable solutions within renewable energyConstruction completed with full capacity for wind production from Dudgeon wind farm and other low-carbon solutions, combining Statoil’s oil and gas portfolio, project delivery capacity and ability to integrate technological solutions. As a starting pointHywind Scotland during fourth quarter of 2017.

·Increased UK presence through increasing ownership in the existingDogger Bank offshore wind portfolio constitutes the main activities in this area. The ambition is to grow and potentially expand into other sources of renewable energyprojects.

Sheringham Shoal

The·Assumed role as operator for the Sheringham Shoal wind farm in April 2017.

·Acquired 43.75% of the Apodi solar asset in Brazil, operated by Scatec. The acquisition was made through a 40% share from Scatec Solar and 3.75% from ApodiPar. The Apodi solar project started construction during fourth quarter of 2017.

·Awarded the role as operator of the Carbon capture and storage project for the FEED study. Partners Shell and Total have 33.33% each.

·The existing 5-year agreement for the Technology Centre Mongstad for testing of different CO2 capture technologies expired in August 2017. Statoil, Total, Shell and Gassnova (Norwegian State-owned entity) have agreed to continue operations for three years. Statoil’s equity share has been reduced from 20% to 7.5% (in line with other industrial partners).

The Sheringham Shoal offshore wind farm (Statoil 40%, operator) located off the coast of Norfolk, UK, was formally opened in September 2012. The wind farm is in full production with 88 turbines and an installed capacity of 317 megawatt (MW). Following divestment in 2014, it is now owned 40% by Statkraft, a Norwegian wholly state-owned company, 40% by Statoil and 20% by the UK Green Investment Bank (GIB).MW. The wind farm's annual production is approximately 1.1 terawatt hours (TWh) and it has the capacity to provide power to approximately 220,000 households. Statoil took over the role as operator of Sheringham Shoal from the second quarter of 2017.

 

Dudgeon offshore wind project

Statoil acquired a 70% share in the The Dudgeon offshore wind farm project in October 2012 together with Statkraft (30%). In 2014 Statoil reduced its share to (Statoil 35%, bringing in Masdar as a new partner. The projectoperator) is located in the Greater Wash Areaarea off the English east coast, not fara short distance from Sheringham Shoal. A final investment decision for the 402 MW project was made in July 2014. All construction contracts are awarded2014 and construction has started.the project was inaugurated in November 2017. The wind farm is expected to produce 1.7 TWh yearly from 67 turbines, with the capacity to provide power for approximatelyaround 410,000 households. It is expected to be in full operation by year end 2017.

 

Dogger Bank


Dudgeon Offshore Wind.

Photo: Ole Jørgen Bratland

40Statoil, and Statkraft, together with RWE and SSE, are partners in the Forewind consortium, each with a 25% equity stake. Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


The Dogger Bank area has a total consented capacity of 4.8 GW and is potentially the largest offshore wind farm development in the world. TheIn February and August 2015, the consortium received consent from the UK authorities for four projects, each with a capacity of 1200 MW byMW. Statoil and Statkraft, together with RWE and SSE, were partners in the UK GovernmentForewind consortium, each with a 25% equity stake. The consortium has gone through a major reorganisation during 2017. Statoil and SSE bought Statkraft’s shares in FebruaryMarch 2017 and a project split followed in August 2015.

Hywind

The world's first full-scale floating offshore wind turbine has been in operation as2017, Innogy (RWE) now owns Project 3 (Teesside B) 100%, and Statoil and SSE have entered into a demonstration facility off the coast of Karmøyshareholders’ agreement for six years. Hywind's overall performance has exceeded expectationsProjects 1, 2 and has experienced several storms4 with extreme wind of over 40m/s and maximum waves of 19 m height without any damage influencing technical integritya 50/50 ownership of the structure or turbine. Statoil is continuously working on improving the operating model. Statoil`s strategy has been to utilise the experience gained from this demo project to develop a floating wind park pilot, which Statoil has achieved with Hywind Scotland.Creyke Beck A and B, and Teesside A projects.

 

The Arkona offshore wind farm (Statoil 50%, operated by e.on) is being developed in the German part of the Baltic Sea, and the operations and maintenance base will be located in Sassnitz on the island of Rügen. A final investment decision for the up to 385 MW project was made in April 2016. During 2017 the installation of the substructures was completed, and Arkona is expected to be in full operation in 2019. The wind farm is expected to provide power to approximately 400,000 German households from 60 turbines.

The Hywind Scotland pilot project

Hywind Scotlandwind park (Statoil 75%, operator) is a floating wind pilot park using the Hywind concept, developed and owned by Statoil. The business case is to demonstrate cost-efficient and low risk solutions for commercial scale parks. This will be done by verifying the use of larger Wind Turbine Generators (WTG), optimising the design and demonstrating scale effects in a wind farm layout. Statoil will install 5 Siemens 6.0MW turbines, a total capacity of 30MW. The project is located at Buchan Deep, approximately 25 km off Peterhead on the Westeast coast of Scotland. Statoil completed the project during 2017 and has installed 5 Siemens 6 MW turbines. Production is expected to be 0.14 TWh/year. The project was sanctioned in October 2015 and planned first deliveries to the grid is fourth quarter 2017.year, powering around 20,000 households. This is the next step in ourStatoil’s strategy towards deployment of ourthe first utility large scale floating wind farms.

 

Statoil was the winner of the New York Wind energy area lease, following the December 2016 BOEM lease sale, with a winning bid of USD 42.5 million. The lease is 321 km2, large enough to support one or more offshore wind developments with a total capacity of more than 1 GW. The lease is located approximately 20 km directly south of Long Island. The project has been named “Empire Wind” and is being further matured towards a plan for development during 2018.

 

44Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Carbon capture and Storage (CCS)

Since 1996, Statoil has proven experience in CCScarbon capture and storage (CCS) and has continued to develop competence through research engagement in the Technicalat Technology Centre Mongstad, (TCM)the world’s largest facility for testing and improving CO2 capture. In addition, our offshore oil and gas operations inat Sleipner and Snøhvit.hvit represent two of the world’s largest CCS units. Statoil will seek to deploy ourits competence and experience in other CCS projects, continue to evaluate opportunitiesboth to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and explore carbon dioxide forto drive new opportunities, including enhanced oil recovery (EOR) possibilities.possibilities and carbon neutral value chains based on hydrogen. Statoil has, on behalf of the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, performed a feasibility study for establishing a CO2 storage facility in the Norwegian Sea. In 2017 the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy awarded Statoil the lead role to assess a full CCS value chain project covering both storage and transportation from three industrial sources in Norway. Statoil, Shell and Total are partners in the project with equal shares of one-third each.

 

3.8.2 In February 2016, Statoil launched the Statoil Energy ventures fund, a new energy investment fund dedicated to investing in attractive and ambitious growth companies in low carbon energy, supporting Statoil’s strategy of growth in new energy solutions. The Statoil Energy Ventures Fund will invest up to USD 200 million over a period of four to seven years.

As of the date of this report, the fund has utilised less than a quarter of the total Statoil venture fund through four direct investments in four different segments, and is a limited partner in one financial venture capital fund.

Global Strategy and& Business Development (GSB)

The Global Strategy and& Business Development (GSB) business area is Statoil’s functional centre for strategy and business development.

GSB is responsible for Statoil’s global strategy processes and identifies develops and delivers inorganic business development opportunities. opportunities, including corporate mergers and acquisitions. This is achieved through close collaboration across geographic locations and business areas. Statoil's strategy forms the basis for guiding the company’s business development focus.

 

GSB's business activities are organised inGSB also hosts several corporate functions, including Statoil’s Corporate Sustainability function, which is shaping the following areas:

·Corporate strategy and analysis: Managing corporate strategy development processes, competitor intelligence, industry analysis

·Political Analysis: Monitoring political developments nationally, regionally and globally. The unit assesses geopolitical issues and trends impacting our business, political risk related to specific countries and projects, and changes to the broader security threat picture

·Corporate SustainabilityShaping Statoil'scompany’s strategic response to sustainability issues development of relevant policies and reporting on the company'sStatoil’s sustainability performance

·Business Development Origination: Identifying and originating business development opportunities, sharing on-the-ground context and intelligence across the organisation

·Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestments: Executing of business development and merger/corporate acquisition/divestment options, sharing deal activity context and intelligence across the organisation

·Project Support and ExecutionCommercial negotiation support, commercial and technical valuation, business development best practiceperformance.

 

3.8.3 Technology, Projects and Drilling (TPD)

Technology, Projects and Drilling (TPD) business area is responsible for delivering projects and wells and providing global support on standards and procurement. TPD is also responsible for developing Statoil as a technology company.

Key events in 2015:

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    4541


 

Corporate staffs and support functions

·117 offshore wells were delivered, including 29 exploration wellsCorporate Staffs and support functions comprise the non-operating activities supporting Statoil, and include headquarters and central functions that provide business support such as finance and control, corporate communication, safety, audit, legal services and people and leadership.

·Technology, Projects & Drilling efficiency has been significantly enhanced over the last three years. During 2015, the average number of metres drilled per day increased 25% from 2014(TPD)

·Valemon came on stream: Statoil’s first platform to be controlled remotely from shore. Once drilling is completed, the platform will transform into a normally unmanned platform

·The first subsea gas compression plant in the world was brought on line at Åsgard. Another subsea gas compression plantTechnology, Projects & Drilling (TPD) business area is being developed at Gullfaksresponsible

·Fast-track projects Oseberg Delta 2, Smørbukk South extension and Gullfaks South improved oil recovery were brought on stream

·The construction of the fast-track for global project Gullfaks Rimfaksdalen started

·Three major pipelays were completed: Polarled gas pipeline, Edvard Grieg oil export pipeline and Utsira high gas export pipeline

·The world’s largest system for four-dimensional permanent reservoir monitoring was installed at Snorre and Grane, improving the oil recovery rate. 700 kilometres of seismic cables were installed on the seabed

·Two new compressors were brought on line on the Troll A platform

·A new floating storage vessel was brought into operation at Heidrun

·The development, of Aasta Hansteen, Gina Krog and Mariner fields continued through 2015

·The construction of the Johan Sverdrup project started. In 2015, contracts worth more than NOK 50 billion were awarded

·The plan forwell delivery, technology development and operation of Oseberg Vestflanken 2 was submitted to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. The field is being developed using an unmanned wellhead platform, a new, cost-effective solutionprocurement in Statoil’s field development toolbox

·A decision was made to develop Hywind Scotland pilot park. The commercial scale, floating wind farm is being developed using Hywind, a floating wind turbine concept developed and owned by Statoil. The construction of Dudgeon offshore wind farm progressed through 2015

·There has been a certain overcapacity in the offshore rig portfolio owing to reduced demand and increased efficiency

·18 specific and profitable projects aimed at reducing the environmental footprint have been established under the General Electric/Statoil powering collaboration, launched in 2015

·During 2015, 101 new technologies were developed. 20 selected high-value technologies were implemented in 59 different locations, a 50% increase from 2014

·Statoil has captured significant market effects through renegotiating and rebidding most of the agreement portfolio with suppliers during 2015

From 1 January 2016, Statoil has gathered all project expertise in TPD, into one integrated, cost-effective Project Development organisation (PRD), to ensure lean and effective execution and decision-making. From the same date, Technology Excellence and Research, Development and Innovation were merged into one integrated Research and Technology organisation (R&T), reinforcing innovation and technology effectiveness.

TPD business activities were in 2015 organised in the following business clusters:

 

Research Development and Innovation (RDI)

RDI & Technology (R&T) is responsible for carrying out research and technology development to meet Statoil's business needs on short and long term.

RDI is organised in four research programmes closely aligned with Statoil’s technology strategy: Exploration, Mature area developments and improved oil recovery, Frontier developments and Un-conventionals. In addition, there are two other units: Innovation and Projects. RDI has four research centres in Norway with world-leading laboratories and large-scale test facilities. Internationally, RDI is currently active in our operations in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), Houston and Austin (the US), St. Johns (Canada) and Beijing (China). Cooperation with external environments plays an important role for R&D in Statoil, and RDI has an Academia programme which coordinates cooperation with Norwegian and international universitiesterm,

Technology Excellence (TEX)

TEX is globally responsible for delivering technical expertise to projects, business developmentsdevelopment, projects and assets, and for implementing new technologies.

 

TEX is responsible for driving simplification and standardisation and delivers technological expertise within the areas of petroleum, subsea and marine, facilities and operations, and safety and sustainability technologies enhancing Statoil's operational performance. TechnologyProject development and implementation are used to achieve corporate targets for production growth, improved efficiency and regularity, reserve growth and reduced costs. Through Statoil technology invest (STI), TEX supports innovators and entrepreneurs with technology development and commercialisation activities.

Projects (PRO)

PRO (PRD) is responsible for planning and executing all major facilities development, modificationbrownfield and field decommissioning projects in Statoil.where Statoil is the operator.

 

The project portfolio is diverse, ranging from major new field developments to both small and large development projects on the NCS and internationally. During 2015, around 50 projects were in the execution phase, and at year-end, 30 projects were in the early phase. The proportion of larger projects in the portfolio has increased over the last three years.

Drilling and Well (D&W)

D&W is responsible for providing cost-efficient well delivery ensuringand well operations, fit-for-purpose drilling facilities and providing expertise and advice to Statoil's global drilling and well operations.

46Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


D&W operated 35 rig years in 2015, compared to 40 in 2014, and delivered production and exploration wells offshore on the NCS and Brazil, and exploration wells in Canada, the Gulf of Mexico, Tanzania and the UK.

 

Procurement and Supplier Relations (PSR)

PSR is responsible for global procurement aligned with Statoil’s business needs, and for managing Statoil's supply chain. Statoil's procurements originate from approximately 12,000 active suppliers.

The procurement process is based on competition and the principles of openness, non-discrimination and equality. PSR encourages and facilitates collaboration with suppliers through communication and by managing supplier relations. By maintaining strong relations with high-quality suppliers, Statoil aims to ensure lasting, long-term competitive advantages. PSR has a strategy for increasing diversity, competition and flexibility in the market to better utilise industry capacity and expertise.

3.8.4 Corporate staffs and support functions

Corporate Staffs and support functions comprise the non-operating activities supporting Statoil.

They include headquarters and central functions that provide business support such as corporate communication, safety, audit, legal services and people and organisation.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201547


3.9 Significant subsidiaries

The following table shows significant subsidiaries and equity accounted companies as of 31 December 2015.

Our voting interest in each company is equivalent to our equity interest.

Ownership in certain subsidiaries and other equity accounted companies

Name

in %

Country of incorporation

 

Name

in %

Country of incorporation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statholding AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Nigeria Deep Water AS

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 15 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Nigeria Outer Shelf AS

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 15/06 Award AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Norsk LNG AS

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 17 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil North Africa Gas AS

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 31 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil North Africa Oil AS

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 38 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Orient AG

100

Switzerland

Statoil Angola Block 39 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil OTS AB

100

Sweden

Statoil Angola Block 40 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Petroleum AS

100

Norway

Statoil Apsheron AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Shah Deniz AS

100

Norway

Statoil Azerbaijan AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Sincor AS

100

Norway

Statoil BTC Finance AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil SP Gas AS

100

Norway

Statoil Coordination Centre NV

100

Belgium

 

Statoil Tanzania AS

100

Norway

Statoil Danmark AS

100

Denmark

 

Statoil Technology Invest AS

100

Norway

Statoil Deutschland GmbH

100

Germany

 

Statoil UK Ltd

100

United Kingdom

Statoil do Brasil Ltda

100

Brazil

 

Statoil Venezuela AS

100

Norway

Statoil Exploration Ireland Ltd.

100

Ireland

 

Statoil Venture AS

100

Norway

Statoil Forsikring AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Metanol ANS

82

Norway

Statoil Færøyene AS

100

Norway

 

Mongstad Refining DA

79

Norway

Statoil Hassi Mouina AS

100

Norway

 

Mongstad Terminal DA

65

Norway

Statoil Indonesia Karama AS

100

Norway

 

Tjeldbergodden Luftgassfabrikk DA

51

Norway

Statoil New Energy AS

100

Norway

 

Naturkraft AS

50

Norway

Statoil Nigeria AS

100

Norway

 

Vestprosess DA

34

Norway

3.10 Production volumes and prices

The business overview is in accordance with our segment's operations as of 31 December 2015, whereas certain disclosures on oil and gas reserves are based on geographical areas as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

For further information about extractive activities, see sections 3.5 Development and Production Norwayand 3.6 Development and Production International, respectively.needs.

 

Statoil prepares its disclosures for oil and gas reserves and certain other supplemental oil and gas disclosures by geographical area, as required by the SEC. The geographical areas are defined by country and continent. They are Norway, Eurasia excluding Norway, Africa and the Americas.

 

For further information about disclosures concerning oil and gas reserves and certain other supplemental disclosures based on geographical areas as required by the SEC, see section 3.11 Proved oil and gas reserves.

3.10.1 Entitlement production

This section describes our oil and gas production and sales volumes.

4842   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

The following table shows Statoil's Norwegianbelow displays major projects operated by Statoil, as well as projects operated by Statoil’s licence partners. More information about ongoing projects are given in the E&P Norway, E&P International, MMP and international entitlement production of oil and natural gas forNES sections. In our world-class portfolio, an additional 35-40 projects are in the periods indicated. The stated production volumes are the volumes to which Statoil is entitled, pursuant to conditions laid down in licence agreements and production-sharing agreements. The production volumes are net of royalty oil paid in kind, and of gas used for fuel and flaring. Our production is based on our proportionate participation in fields with multiple owners and does not include production of the Norwegian State's oil and natural gas. Production of an immaterial quantity of bitumen is included as oil production. NGL includes both LPG and naphtha. The only field containing more than 15% of total proved reserves based on oil equivalent barrels is the Troll field. For further information on production volumes see section 9 Terms and definitions.early phase, maturing towards sanction.

 

 

 

For the year ended 31 December

Entitlement production

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 174  

 173  

 174  

NGL (mmbbls)

 44  

 42  

 42  

Natural gas (bcf)

 1,306  

 1,229  

 1,264  

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 450  

 434  

 441  

 

 

 

 

 

Eurasia excluding Norway

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 13  

 14  

 15  

Natural gas (bcf)

 16  

 56  

 72  

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 16  

 24  

 28  

 

 

 

 

 

Africa

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 75  

 64  

 58  

NGL (mmbbls)

 3  

 2  

 1  

Natural gas (bcf)

 63  

 38  

 40  

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 88  

 72  

 66  

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 62  

 55  

 50  

NGL (mmbbls)

 7  

 7  

 4  

Natural gas (bcf)

 215  

 242  

 196  

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 107  

 106  

 89  

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 324  

 306  

 298  

NGL (mmbbls)

 54  

 51  

 47  

Natural gas (bcf)

 1,600  

 1,565  

 1,571  

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 662  

 635  

 625  

 

 

 

 

 

Troll field 1)

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 14  

 14  

 14  

NGL (mmbbls)

 2  

 2  

 2  

Natural gas (bcf)

 386  

 317  

 304  

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 85  

 73  

 70  

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Note that Troll is also included in Norway stated above.

 

 

 

Project startups and completions 2017

Statoil's interest

Operator

Area

Type

Hebron

9.01%

ExxonMobil

Jeanne d'Arc Basin, off coast of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Oil

In Salah Southern fields

31.85%

Sonatrach/BP/Statoil

Algeria

Oil and gas

Dudgeon offshore wind farm

35.00%

Statoil

North Sea, off English coast

Wind

Hywind Scotland pilot wind park

75.00%

Statoil

North Sea, off Scottish coast

Wind

Gina Krog

58.70%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil and gas

Gullfaks C subsea compression

51.00%

Statoil

North Sea

Improved gas recovery

Byrding

70.00%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil and associated gas

Polarled

37.10%

Statoil

Norwegian Sea

Export pipeline for gas

Ongoing projects with expected startups and completions 2018-2022

Statoil's interest

Operator

Area

Type

Tahiti vertical expansion

25.00%

Chevron

Gulf of Mexico

Oil

Stampede

25.00%

Hess

Gulf of Mexico

Oil

Big Foot

27.50%

Chevron

Gulf of Mexico

Oil

Peregrino phase II

60.00%

Statoil

Campos basin, off coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Oil

Arkona offshore wind farm

50.00%

E.ON

Baltic Sea, off German coast

Wind

Mariner

65.11%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil

Oseberg Vestflanken 2

49.30%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil and gas

Troll B gas module

30.58%

Statoil

North Sea

Increased processing capacity

Martin Linge

19.00%

Total

North Sea

Oil and gas

 - Total's share, Statoil to take over in late March 2018

51.00%

Johan Sverdrup

40.03%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil and associated gas

 - held through Lundin

4.54%

Johan Sverdrup export pipelines, JoSEPP

40.03%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil and gas export pipelines

 - held through Lundin

4.54%

Utgard Norwegian sector

38.44%

Statoil

North Sea

Gas and condensate

    UK sector

38.00%

Trestakk

59.10%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil and associated gas

Huldra decommissioning

19.87%

Statoil

North Sea

Field decommissioning

Njord future

20.00%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil

Snorre expansion

33.28%

Statoil

North Sea

Oil

Aasta Hansteen

51.00%

Statoil

Norwegian Sea

Gas

Snefrid Nord

51.00%

Statoil

Norwegian Sea

Gas

Johan Castberg

50.00%

Statoil

Norwegian Sea

Oil

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    4943


 

3.10.2 Sales prices2.7 CORPORATE

The following tables present realised sales prices.

 

Norway

Eurasia

excluding

Norway

Africa

Americas

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

Average sales price oil and condensate in USD per bbl

52.2

50.7

49.4

39.4

Average sales price NGL in USD per bbl

30.1

-

26.2

12.5

Average sales price natural gas in NOK per Sm3

2.2

1.4

1.7

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

Average sales price oil and condensate in USD per bbl

98.3

101.3

95.6

78.3

Average sales price NGL in USD per bbl

59.3

-

59.7

37.3

Average sales price natural gas in NOK per Sm3

2.3

1.3

2.2

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December 2013

 

 

 

 

Average sales price oil and condensate in USD per bbl

109.1

110.5

107.3

89.1

Average sales price NGL in USD per bbl

67.4

-

69.7

59.2

Average sales price natural gas in NOK per Sm3

2.4

0.9

2.1

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

50Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


3.11 Proved oil and gas reserves

Proved oil and gas reserves were estimated to be 5,060 mmboe at year end 2015, compared to 5,359 mmboe at the end of 2014.

Statoil's proved reserves are estimated and presented in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 4-10 (a) of Regulation S-X, revised as of January 2009, and relevant Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DI) and Staff Accounting Bulletins, as issued by the SEC staff. For additional information, see section Proved oil and gas reserves in note 2 Significant accounting policiesto the Consolidated financial statements. For further details on proved reserves, see also note 27Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited) in the Consolidated financial statements

  

Changes in proved reserves estimates are most commonly the result of revisions of estimates due to observed production performance, extensions of proved areas through drilling activities or the inclusion of proved reserves in new discoveries through the sanctioning of new development projects. These are sources of additions to proved reserves that are the result of continuous business processes and can be expected to continue to add reserves in the future.

Proved reserves can also be added or subtracted through the acquisition or disposal of assets. Changes in proved reserves can also be due to factors outside management control, such as changes in oil and gas prices. Lower oil and gas prices normally allow less oil and gas to be recovered from the accumulations. However for fields with production sharing agreements (PSAs) and similar contracts a reduced oil price may result in higher entitlement to the produced volume. These changes are included in the revisions category in the table below.

The principles for booking proved gas reserves are limited to contracted gas sales or gas with access to a robust gas market.

In Norway and the UK, Statoil recognises reserves as proved when a development plan is submitted, as there is reasonable certainty that such a plan will be approved by the regulatory authorities. Outside these territories, reserves are generally booked as proved when regulatory approval is received, or when such approval is imminent. Reserves from new discoveries, upward revisions of reserves and purchases of proved reserves are expected to contribute to maintaining proved reserves in future years. Undrilled well locations onshore are generally booked as proved undeveloped reserves when a development plan has been adopted and the well locations are scheduled to be drilled within five years,

Approximately 89% of our proved reserves are located in OECD countries. Norway is by far the most important contributor in this category, followed by the United States of America (US), Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK).

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201551


Of Statoil's total proved reserves, 9% are related to production-sharing agreements (PSAs) in non-OECD countries such as Azerbaijan, Angola, Algeria, Nigeria, Libya and Russia. Other non-OECD reserves are related to concessions in Brazil and Venezuela, representing less than 3% of Statoil's total proved reserves. These are included in proved reserves in the Americas.

 

Significant changes in our proved reserves in 2015 were:

Negative revisions due to lower commodity prices compared to last year, which resulted in a reduction of approximately 350 million boe. A large portion of this is related to undeveloped fields where lower commodity prices resulted in earlier economic cut-off, such as the Mariner field in the UK which is under development and is expected to start production in 2018, and uneconomic undeveloped well locations onshore US. The negative revisions are partly offset by positive revisions due to better performance of producing fields, maturing of improved recovery projects, and reduced uncertainty due to further drilling and production experience. The net effect of the positive and negative revisions is a reduction of 42 million boe in 2015. The estimated reduction due to change in prices is a rough estimate derived by using last year’s prices on this year’s volume base. In the calculation no adjustments have been made for the possible effect on the activity level, operating cost or development cost. For more information regarding prices see section 27 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited)

Proved reserves from new discoveries have also been added through the sanctioning of new field development projects in 2015, Johan Sverdrup being the largest contributor. The new projects added a total of 476 million boe

Further drilling in the Bakken, Marcellus and Eagle Ford onshore plays in the US increased the proved reserves in 2015, and some of these additions are presented as extensions. Extension of proved area on existing field added a total of 150 million boe of new proved reserves in 2015

The net effect of purchase and sale reduced the reserves by 221 million boe in 2015

The 2015 entitlement production was 662 million boe, an increase of 4.3% compared to 2014. New discoveries with proved reserves booked in 2015 are all expected to start production within a period of five years

Summary of proved reserves as of 31 December 2015

Reserves category

Proved reserves

Oil and Condensate

NGL

Natural Gas

Total oil and gas

(mmboe)

(mmboe)

(bcf)

(mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 

 

 

 

Norway

 505  

 235  

 10,664  

 2,641  

Eurasia excluding Norway

 48  

 -  

 32  

 53  

Africa

 248  

 9  

 206  

 294  

Americas

 303  

 45  

 999  

 526  

Total Developed proved reserves

 1,104  

 290  

 11,901  

 3,515  

 

 

 

 

 

Undeveloped

 

 

 

 

Norway

 711  

 56  

 2,278  

 1,173  

Eurasia excluding Norway

 29  

 -  

 161  

 57  

Africa

 30  

 6  

 160  

 64  

Americas

 217  

 12  

 124  

 251  

Total Undeveloped proved reserves

 987  

 74  

 2,723  

 1,546  

 

 

 

 

 

Total proved reserves

 2,091  

 364  

 14,624  

 5,060  


Statoil's proved reserves of bitumen in the Americas are included as oil in the table above since they represent less than 2% of Statoil's proved reserves, which is regarded as immaterial.

The basis for equivalents is presented in the section Terms and definitions.

52Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Reserves replacement

The reserves replacement ratio is defined as the sum of additions and revisions of proved reserves divided by produced volumes in any given period. The following table presents the changes in reserves in each category relating to the reserve replacement ratio for the years 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

For the year ended 31 December

(million boe)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 (42) 

 356  

 395  

Extensions and discoveries

 627  

 253  

 523  

Purchase of petroleum-in-place

 13  

 20  

 14  

Sales of petroleum-in-place

 (235) 

 (233) 

 (131) 

 

 

 

 

Total reserve additions

 363  

 395  

 802  

Production

 (662) 

 (635) 

 (625) 

 

 

 

 

Net change in proved reserves

 (299) 

 (240) 

 177  


The reserves replacement ratio for 2015 was 0.55 compared to 0.62 in 2014. The 2015 reserves replacement ratio, excluding purchases and sales of petroleum in place, was 0.88. The average replacement ratio for the last three years was 0.81, or 1.10 excluding purchases and sales.

 

For the year ended 31 December

Reserves replacement ratio (including purchases and sales)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Annual

 0.55  

 0.62  

 1.28  

Three-year-average

 0.81  

 0.97  

 1.15  


The usefulness of the reserves replacement ratio is limited by the volatility of oil prices, the influence of oil and gas prices on PSA reserve booking, sensitivity related to the timing of project sanctions and the time lag between exploration expenditure and the booking of reserves.

 

Proved reserves in Norway

A total of 3,814 million boe is recognised as proved reserves in 58 fields and field development projects on the NCS, representing 75% of Statoil's total proved reserves. Of these, 54 fields and field areas are currently in production, 42 of which are operated by Statoil. Four new field development projects added reserves during 2015, Johan Sverdrup, Oseberg Vestflanken 2, Fram C-Øst Brent and Opal categorised as extensions and discoveries. Production experience, further drilling and improved recovery on several of Statoil's producing fields in Norway also contributed positively to the revisions of the proved reserves in 2015.

Sales of reserves are related to the agreement with Repsol. This has reduced Statoil's share of proved reserves on Gudrun.

Of the proved reserves on the NCS, 2,641 million boe, or 69%, are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 60% are gas reserves related to large offshore gas fields such as Troll, Snøhvit, Oseberg, Ormen Lange, Tyrihans, Visund, Aasta Hansteen and Åsgard and 40% are liquid reserves.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201553


 

Proved reserves in Eurasia, excluding Norway

In this area, Statoil has proved reserves of 111 million boe related to four fields and field developments in Azerbaijan, the UK, Ireland and Russia. Eurasia excluding Norway represents 2% of Statoil's total proved reserves, Azerbaijan being the main contributor with the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli fields. All fields are producing. The effect of the farm out of Shah Deniz reduced the proved reserves at year end 2015.

Proved undeveloped reserves were reduced due to negative revisions linked to lower commodity prices resulting in earlier economic cut-off for the fields, primarily the Mariner field in the UK which is under development and is expected to start production in 2018.

Of the proved reserves in Eurasia, 53 million boe or 48% are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 69% are liquid reserves and 31% are gas reserves.

  

Proved reserves in Africa

Statoil recognises proved reserves of 358 million boe related to 29 fields and field developments in several West and North African countries, including Algeria, Angola, Libya and Nigeria. Africa represents 7% of Statoil's total proved reserves. Angola is the primary contributor to the proved reserves in this area, with 24 of the 29 fields.

In Angola, Statoil has proved reserves in three blocks, Block 15, Block 17 and Block 31, with production from all blocks. During 2015 Statoil exited Block 4/05, Gimboa is therefore removed from proved reserves this year.

All fields are in production in Algeria and Nigeria. Murzuq and Mabruk are currently not producing due to the unrest in Libya.

The disputed equity determination at Agbami will potentially alter Statoil's equity share in this field. The effect on the proved reserves will be included once the redetermination is finalised and the effect is known.

Of the total proved reserves in Africa, 294 million boe, or 82%, are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 82% are liquid reserves and 18% are gas reserves.

Proved reserves in the Americas

In North and South America, Statoil has proved reserves equal to 777 million boe in a total of 17 fields and field development projects. This represents 15% of Statoil's total proved reserves. Ten of these fields are located in the US, seven of which are offshore field developments in the Gulf of Mexico and three are onshore tight reservoir assets. Five are located in Canada and two in South America.


In the US, four of the seven fields in the Gulf of Mexico are in production. Field development is ongoing on Big Foot, Heidelberg and Stampede. The onshore tight reservoir assets Marcellus, Eagle Ford and Bakken are all in production. In Canada, proved reserves are related both to offshore field developments, and to the Leismer field in the Kai Kos Dehseh oil sands project in Alberta.

Proved undeveloped reserves were reduced due to negative revisions linked to lower commodity prices, primarily resulting in undeveloped well locations onshore US becoming uneconomic.

Several transactions were completed during 2015, both purchases and sales. The largest were the transaction with Southwestern Energy reducing the reserves in Marcellus, and the agreement with Repsol increasing the reserves in Eagle Ford. The transactions offset each other and the net effect on proved reserves is zero.

54Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Of the total proved reserves in the Americas, 526 million boe, or 68%, are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 74% are liquid reserves and 26% gas reserves.

3.11.1 Development of reserves

In 2015, approximately 438 million boe were converted from undeveloped to developed proved reserves.

The start-up of production from Edvard Grieg, Oseberg Delta 2 and Valemon in Norway together with Bavuca and Kakocha in Angola and Corrib in Ireland increased the developed reserves by 69 million boe during 2015. The rest of the converted volume is related to development activities on producing fields.

Net proved reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

Total

Developed

Undeveloped

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 5,359  

 3,725  

 1,635  

Revisions and improved recovery

 (42) 

 96  

 (138) 

Extensions and discoveries

 627  

 -  

 627  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 13  

 6  

 7  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (235) 

 (88) 

 (147) 

Production

 (662) 

 (662) 

 -  

Moved from undeveloped to developed

 -  

 438  

 (438) 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 5,060  

 3,515  

 1,546  

The new development projects in Norway, added a total of 476 million boe of proved undeveloped reserves in 2015, the largest being Johan Sverdrup. Further drilling in the Bakken, Marcellus and Eagle Ford onshore plays in the US increased the proved area and added proved undeveloped reserves. These additions are categorised as extensions and together with extensions on existing fields and new discoveries this added a total of 627 million boe of proved undeveloped reserves.

Revision of estimate on existing fields added 96 million boe proved developed reserves and reduced proved undeveloped reserves by 138 million boe. These revisions are based on new information available either from drilling of new wells or from production experience, resulting in an improved understanding of the fields. The negative revisions are mainly linked to lower commodity prices resulting in earlier economic cut-off for the fields and undeveloped well locations becoming uneconomic.

The net effect of the transactions done in 2015, reduced the proved undeveloped reserves by 139 million boe.

 

 

Oil and Condensate

NGL

Natural gas

Total

 

 

(mmboe)

(mmboe)

(bcf)

(mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

Proved reserves end of year

 2,091  

 364  

 14,624  

 5,060  

 

Developed

 1,104  

 290  

 11,901  

 3,515  

 

Undeveloped

 987  

 74  

 2,723  

 1,546  

2014

Proved reserves end of year

 1,942  

 403  

 16,919  

 5,359  

 

Developed

 1,156  

 310  

 12,677  

 3,725  

 

Undeveloped

 786  

 93  

 4,242  

 1,635  

2013

Proved reserves end of year

 1,877  

 441  

 18,416  

 5,600  

 

Developed

 1,052  

 330  

 13,073  

 3,711  

 

Undeveloped

 826  

 111  

 5,343  

 1,888  

As of 31 December 2015, the total proved undeveloped reserves amounted to 1,546 million boe, 76% of which are related to fields in Norway. The Troll, Snøhvit, Visund, Grane and Oseberg fields, which have continuous development activities, represent the largest undeveloped assets in Norway together with fields not yet in production, such as Johan Sverdrup, Aasta Hansteen, Gina Krogh, Ivar Aasen and Goliat. The largest assets with respect to undeveloped proved reserves outside Norway are Bakken and Stampede in the US, Peregrino in Brazil, Hebron in Canada, Corrib in Ireland and In Salah in Algeria.

In 2015, Statoil incurred NOK 85 billion in development costs relating to assets carrying proved reserves, NOK 70 billion of which was related to proved undeveloped reserves.

Large fields with continuous development activity may contain reserves that are expected to remain undeveloped for five years or more. Examples are Johan Sverdrup, Troll, Snøhvit, Gina Krogh and Aasta Hansteen in Norway. These are large field developments with several billion dollars invested in complex infrastructure and with continuous development that will require extensive, sustained drilling of wells for a

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201555


long period of time. It is highly unlikely that these field development projects will be prematurely terminated, since this would result in a significant loss of capital.

Additional information about proved oil and gas reserves is provided in note 27 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited) to the Consolidated financial statements.

3.11.2 Preparations of reserves estimates

Statoil's annual reporting process for proved reserves is coordinated by a central team.

The corporate reserves management (CRM) team consists of qualified professionals in geosciences, reservoir and production technology and financial evaluation. The team has an average of more than 20 years' experience in the oil and gas industry. CRM reports to the senior vice president of finance and control in the Technology, Drilling and Projects business area and is thus independent of the Development & Production business areas in Norway, North America and International. All the reserves estimates have been prepared by Statoil's technical staff.

Although the CRM team reviews the information centrally, each asset team is responsible for ensuring that it is in compliance with the requirements of the SEC and Statoil's corporate standards. Information about proved oil and gas reserves, standardised measures of discounted net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves and other information related to proved oil and gas reserves, is collected from the local asset teams and checked by CRM for consistency and conformity with applicable standards. The final numbers for each asset are quality-controlled and approved by the responsible asset manager, before aggregation to the required reporting level by CRM.

The aggregated results are submitted for approval to the relevant business area management teams and the corporate executive committee.

The person with primary responsibility for overseeing the preparation of the reserves estimates is the chair of the CRM team. The person who presently holds this position has a bachelor's degree in earth sciences from the University of Gothenburg, and a master's degree in petroleum exploration and exploitation from Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. She has 30 years' experience in the oil and gas industry, 29 of them with Statoil. She is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineering (SPE) and vice-chair of the UNECE Expert Group on Resource Classification (EGRC).

DeGolyer and MacNaughton report

Petroleum engineering consultants DeGolyer and MacNaughton have carried out an independent evaluation of Statoil's proved reserves as of 31 December 2015. The evaluation accounts for 100% of Statoil's proved reserves. The aggregated net proved reserves estimates prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton do not differ materially from those prepared by Statoil when compared on the basis of net equivalent barrels.

 

Oil and Condensate

NGL/LPG

Sales Gas

Oil Equivalent

Net proved reserves at 31 December 2015

(mmbbls)

(mmbbl)

(bcf)

(mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated by Statoil

 2,091  

 364  

 14,624  

 5,060  

Estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton

 2,159  

 379  

 14,309  

 5,087  


A reserves audit report summarising this evaluation is included as Exhibit 15 (a)(iv).

3.11.3 Operational statistics

Operational statistics include information about acreage and the number of wells drilled.

Developed and undeveloped acreage

The table below shows the total gross and net developed and undeveloped oil and gas acreage, in which Statoil had interests at 31 December 2015.

A gross value reflects wells or acreage in which Statoil has interests (presented as 100%). The net value corresponds to the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross wells or acres.

 

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Oceania

Total

At 31 December 2015 (in thousands of acres)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed and undeveloped oil and gas acreage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acreage developed

- gross

 871  

 90  

 858  

 494  

 -    

 2,312  

 

- net

 322  

 21  

 271  

 114  

 -    

 729  

Acreage undeveloped

- gross

 9,038  

 41,146  

 13,569  

 23,075  

 18,531  

 105,359  

 

- net

 3,419  

 17,495  

 4,637  

 10,073  

 11,160  

 46,784  

56Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015



The largest concentrations of developed acreage in Norway are in the Troll, Skarv, Snøhvit, Ormen Lange and Oseberg areas. In Africa, the Algerian gas development projects In Amenas and In Salah represent the largest concentrations of developed acreage (gross and net).

Statoil's largest undeveloped acreage concentration is in Russia with 18% of the total acreage and 48% of the total acreage in Eurasia excluding Norway. In Russia, Statoil participates in a joint venture with Rosneft. The net acreage given in the table above represents Statoil’s share of the joint venture. The largest concentration of undeveloped acreage in the Americas is Nicaragua, with 33% of the total for this geographic area. In Africa, the largest acreage concentration is in Angola, representing 56% of the total for this geographic area.

Statoil holds acreage in numerous concessions, blocks and leases. The terms and conditions regarding expiration dates vary significantly from property to property. Work programs are designed to ensure that the exploration potential of any property is fully evaluated before expiration.

Acreage related to several of these concessions, blocks and leases are scheduled to expire within the next three years. Any acreage which has already been evaluated to be non-profitable may be relinquished prior to the current expiration date. In other cases, Statoil may decide to apply for an extension if more time is needed in order to fully evaluate the potential of the properties. Historically, Statoil has generally been successful in obtaining such extensions.

Most of the undeveloped acreage that will expire within the next three years is related to early exploration activities where no production is expected in the foreseeable future. The expiration of these leases, blocks and concessions will therefore not have any material impact on our reserves.

Productive oil and gas wells

The number of gross and net productive oil and gas wells, in which Statoil had interests at 31 December 2015, are shown in the table below.

 

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of productive oil and gas wells

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil wells

- gross

 821  

 166  

 468  

 3,130  

 4,585  

 

- net

 281.4  

 24.2  

 71.3  

 706.4  

 1,083.2  

Gas wells

- gross

 189  

 6  

 85  

 1,953  

 2,233  

 

- net

 81.6  

 1.9  

 32.7  

 486.3  

 602.4  


The total gross number of productive wells as of end 2015 includes 383 oil wells and 12 gas wells with multiple completions or wells with more than one branch.


Net productive and dry oil and gas wells drilled

The following tables show the net productive and dry exploratory and development oil and gas wells completed or abandoned by Statoil in the past three years. Productive wells include exploratory wells in which hydrocarbons were discovered, and where drilling or completion has been suspended pending further evaluation. A dry well is one found to be incapable of producing sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Oceania

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled

 10.2  

 1.0  

 2.5  

 2.6  

 -    

 16.3  

- Net dry exploratory wells drilled

 4.6  

 0.4  

 0.5  

 0.9  

 -    

 6.4  

- Net productive exploratory wells drilled

 5.6  

 0.7  

 2.0  

 1.7  

 -    

 9.9  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry development wells drilled

 32.1  

 4.1  

 10.6  

 228.8  

 -    

 275.6  

- Net dry development wells drilled

 3.6  

 -    

 4.3  

 0.3  

 -    

 8.2  

- Net productive development wells drilled

 28.6  

 4.1  

 6.3  

 228.5  

 -    

 267.4  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled

 12.0  

 1.0  

 4.7  

 3.4  

 3.6  

 24.7  

- Net dry exploratory wells drilled

 3.4  

 1.0  

 2.7  

 1.6  

 3.6  

 12.2  

- Net productive exploratory wells drilled

 8.6  

 -    

 2.0  

 1.9  

 -    

 12.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry development wells drilled

 26.9  

 2.7  

 8.5  

 386.1  

 -    

 424.2  

- Net dry development wells drilled

 3.5  

 -    

 1.1  

 1.2  

 -    

 5.8  

- Net productive development wells drilled

 23.4  

 2.7  

 7.4  

 384.9  

 -    

 418.4  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled

 19.3  

 0.3  

 2.2  

 2.3  

 -    

 24.0  

- Net dry exploratory wells drilled

 7.3  

 0.3  

 2.2  

 2.3  

 -    

 12.0  

- Net productive exploratory wells drilled

 12.0  

 -    

 -    

 -    

 -    

 12.0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry development wells drilled

 26.7  

 2.3  

 5.9  

 321.9  

 -    

 356.7  

- Net dry development wells drilled

 1.7  

 -    

 0.7  

 1.3  

 -    

 3.7  

- Net productive development wells drilled

 24.9  

 2.3  

 5.3  

 320.6  

 -    

 353.1  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201557


58Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Exploratory and development drilling in process

The following table shows the number of exploratory and development oil and gas wells in the process of being drilled by Statoil at 31 December 2015.

 

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of wells in progress

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development wells

- gross

 68  

 4  

 13  

 202  

 287  

 

- net

 24.5  

 0.3  

 2.7  

 67.7  

 95.2  

Exploratory wells

- gross

 1  

 -    

 -    

 8  

 9  

 

- net

 0.4  

 -    

 -    

 5.4  

 5.8  

3.11.4 Delivery commitments

This section describes the long-term NCS commitments for the contract gas years 2015-2018.

On behalf of the Norwegian State's direct financial interest (SDFI), Statoil is responsible for managing, transporting and selling the Norwegian state's oil and gas from the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). These reserves are sold in conjunction with Statoil's own reserves. As part of this arrangement, Statoil delivers gas to customers under various types of sales contracts. In order to meet the commitments, we utilise a field supply schedule that ensures the highest possible total value for Statoil and SDFI's joint portfolio of oil and gas.

The majority of our gas volumes in Norway are sold under long-term contracts with take-or-pay clauses. Statoil's and SDFI's annual delivery commitments under these agreements are expressed as the sum of the expected off-take under these contracts. As of 31 December 2015, the long-term commitments from NCS for the Statoil/SDFI arrangement totalled approximately 14.51 trillion cubic feet (tcf) (411 bcm).

Statoil and SDFI's delivery commitments, expressed as the sum of expected off-take for the gas years 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, are 2.28, 1.89, 1.56 and 1.22 tcf (64.7, 53.5, 44.2 and 44.0 bcm), respectively. The remaining volumes are sold to large industrial end users or on the short-term market.

Statoil's currently developed gas reserves in Norway are more than sufficient to meet our share of these commitments for the next three years.

 

3.12 Applicable laws and regulationsAPPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS


Statoil operates in more than 30 countries and is exposed to, and committed to compliance with, a number of laws and regulations globally.

 

This article focuses primarily on Norwegian laws specific for Statoil`s core activities, taking into account that the majority of Statoil’s production is produced on the NCS, the ownership structure of the company and that Statoil is registered and has its headquarters in Norway.

 

3.12.1 Norwegian petroleum laws and licensing system

The principal laws governing Statoil’s petroleum activities in Norway are the Norwegian Petroleum Act and the Norwegian Petroleum Taxation Act.

 

Norway is not a member of the European Union (EU), but Norway is a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). The EU and the EFTA Member States have entered into the Agreement on the European Economic Area, referred to as the EEA Agreement, which provides for the inclusion of EU legislation covering the four freedoms - the free movement of goods, services, persons and capital - in the national law of the EFTA Member States (except Switzerland). An increasing volume of regulations affecting Statoil is adopted in the EU and then applied to Norway under the EEA Agreement. As a Norwegian company operating within both EFTA and the EU, Statoil’s business activities are subject to both the EFTA Convention governing intra-EFTA trade and EU laws and regulations adopted pursuant to the EEA Agreement.

 

For further information about the jurisdictions in which Statoil operates, see sections 32.2 Business overviewand 52.11 Risk review.

 

Under the Petroleum Act, the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (“MPE”) is responsible for resource management and for administering petroleum activities on the NCS. The main task of the Ministry of Petroleum and EnergyMPE is to ensure that petroleum activities are conducted in accordance with the applicable legislation, the policies adopted by the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) and relevant decisions of the Norwegian State. 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201559


 

60Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The Storting's role in relation to major policy issues in the petroleum sector can affect Statoil in two ways: firstly, when the Norwegian State acts in its capacity as majority owner of Statoil shares and, secondly, when the Norwegian State acts in its capacity as regulator:

·          The Norwegian State's shareholding in Statoil is managed by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. The Ministry of Petroleum and EnergyMPE will normally decide how the Norwegian State will vote on proposals submitted to general meetings of the shareholders. However, in certain exceptional cases, it may be necessary for the Norwegian State to seek approval from the Storting before voting on a certain proposal. This will normally be the case if Statoil issues additional shares and such issuance would significantly dilute the Norwegian State's holding, or if such issuance would require a capital contribution from the Norwegian State in excess of government mandates. A decision by the Norwegian State to vote against a proposal on Statoil’s part to issue additional shares would prevent Statoil from raising additional capital in this manner and could adversely affect Statoil’s ability to pursue business opportunities. For more information about the Norwegian State's ownership, see sections 5.1.3 Risks related to state ownership in section 2.11 Risk review and 6.8Major shareholders in section 5.1 Shareholder information

·          The Norwegian State exercises important regulatory powers over Statoil, as well as over other companies and corporations on the NCS. As part of its business, Statoil or the partnerships to which Statoil is a party, frequently need to apply for licences and other approval of various kinds from the Norwegian State. In respect of certain important applications, such as for the approval of major plans for the operation and development of fields, the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy must obtain the consent of the Storting before it can approve the relevant partnership's application. This may take additional time and affect the content of the decision. Although Statoil is majority-owned by the Norwegian State, it does not receive preferential treatment with respect to licences granted by or under any other regulatory rules enforced by the Norwegian State

 

The principal laws governing Statoil’s petroleum activities in Norway and on the NCS are the Norwegian Petroleum Act of 29 November 1996 (the "Petroleum Act") and the regulations issued thereunder, and the Norwegian Petroleum Taxation Act of 13 June 1975 ( the(the "Petroleum Taxation Act"). The Petroleum Act sets out the principle that the Norwegian State is the owner of all subsea petroleum on the NCS, that exclusive right to resource management is vested in the Norwegian State and that the Norwegian State alone is authorised to award licences for petroleum activities as well as determine its terms. Licensees are required to submit a plan for development and operation (PDO) to the Ministry of Petroleum and EnergyMPE for approval. For fields of a certain size, the Storting has to accept the PDO before it is formally approved by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.MPE. Statoil is dependent on the Norwegian State for approval of its NCS exploration and development projects and its applications for production rates for individual fields.

 

Production licences are the most important type of licence awarded under the Petroleum Act and are normally awarded for an initial exploration period, which is typically six years, but which can be shorter. The maximum period is ten years. During this exploration period, the licensees must meet a specified work obligation set out in the licence. If the licensees fulfil the obligations set out in the initial licenselicence period, they are entitled to require that the licence be prolonged for a period specified at the time when the licence is awarded, typically 30 years.

 

However, the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy is not entitled to award 44Statoil, a licence in an area until the Storting has decided to open the area in question for exploration. Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


The terms of the production licences are decided by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. A production licence grants the holder an exclusive right to explore for and produce petroleum within a specified geographical area. The licensees become the owners of the petroleum produced from the field covered by the licence. Production licences are awarded to group of companies forming a joint venture at the Ministry’s discretion. The members of the joint venture are jointly and severally responsible to the Norwegian State for obligations arising from petroleum operations carried out under the licence. The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy decides the form of the joint operating agreements and accounting agreements.

 

The governing body of the joint venture is the management committee. In licences awarded since 1996 where the state's direct financial interest (SDFI) holds an interest, the Norwegian State, acting through Petoro AS, may veto decisions made by the joint venture management committee, which, in the opinion of the Norwegian State, would not be in compliance with the obligations of the licence with respect to the Norwegian State's exploitation policies or financial interests. This power of veto has never been used.

 

Interests in production licences may be transferred directly or indirectly subject to the consent of the Ministry of Petroleum and EnergyMPE and the approval of the Ministry of Finance of a corresponding tax treatment position. In most licences, there are no pre-emption rights in favour of the other licensees. However, the SDFI, or the Norwegian State, as appropriate, still holds pre-emption rights in all licences.

 

The day-to-day management of a field is the responsibility of an operator appointed by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.MPE. The operator is in practice always a member of the joint venture holding the production licence, although this is not legally required. The terms of engagement of the operator are set out in the joint operating agreement. A change of operator requires the consent of the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. In special cases, the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy can order a change of operator.

Licensees are required to submit a plan for development and operation (PDO) to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy for approval. For fields of a certain size, the Storting has to accept the PDO before it is formally approved by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.

 

If important public interests are at stake, the Norwegian State may instruct Statoil and other licensees on the NCS to reduce the production of petroleum. The last time the Norwegian State instructed a reduction in oil production was in 2002.

 

A licence from the Ministry of Petroleum and EnergyMPE is also required in order to establish facilities for the transportation and utilisation of petroleum. Ownership of most facilities for the transportation and utilisation of petroleum in Norway and on the NCS is organised in the form of joint ventures. The participants' agreements are similar to the joint operating agreements.agreements for production.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201561


Licensees are required to prepare a decommissioning plan before a production licence or a licence to establish and use facilities for the transportation and utilisation of petroleum expires or is relinquished, or the use of a facility ceases. On the basis of the decommissioning plan, the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy makes a decision as to the disposal of the facilities.

 

For an overview of Statoil’s activities and shares in Statoil’s production licences on the NCS, see section 3.52.3 E&P Development and Production Norway (DPN).Norway.

 

3.12.2 Gas sales and transportation from the NCS

Statoil markets gas from the NCS on its own behalf and on the Norwegian State's behalf. Gas is transported through the Gassled pipeline network to customers in the UK and mainland Europe.

 

Most of Statoil’s and the Norwegian State's gas produced on the NCS is sold under gas contracts to customers in the European Union (EU). The EU internal energy market has been high on the European Commission's agenda,, and this market has thus been subject to continuous legislative initiatives. Such changes in EU legislation may affect Statoil's marketing of gas.

 

The Norwegian gas transport system, consisting of the pipelines and terminals through which licensees on the NCS transport their gas, is owned by a joint venture called Gassled. The Norwegian Petroleum Act of 29 November 1996 and the pertaining Petroleum Regulation establish the basis for non- discriminatory third-party access to the Gassled transport system. The ownership structure in Gassled and the pertaining regulations are intended to ensure the effectiveness of the system and to prevent conflicts of interest.

To ensure neutrality, the petroleum regulations also stipulate that all booking and allocation of capacity is administrated by Gassco AS, an independent system operator wholly owned by the Norwegian State. Spare capacity is released and allocated to shippers by Gassco based on standard procedures. Capacity that has already been allocated to a shipper may also be transferred bilaterally between shippers.

 

The tariffs for the use of capacity in the transport system are determined by applying a formula set out in separate tariff regulations stipulated by the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. The tariffs are paid on the basis of booked capacity, not on the basis of the volumes actually transported. The Ministry's main objective when setting the tariffs is to ensure that the profits are extracted in the production fields on the NCS and not in the transport system.

 

For further information, see section 3.7.3.3 2.5 MMP – Marketing, Midstream and Processing under Pipelines.

 

3.12.3 The Norwegian State's participation

The Norwegian State's policy as a shareholder in Statoil has been and continues to be to ensure that petroleum activities create the highest possible value for the Norwegian State.

 

Initially, the Norwegian State's participation in petroleum operations was largely organised through Statoil. In 1985, the Norwegian State established the State's direct financial interest (SDFI) through which the Norwegian State has direct participating interests in licences and petroleum facilities on the NCS. As a result, the Norwegian State holds interests in a number of licences and petroleum facilities in which Statoil also hold interests. Petoro AS, a company wholly owned by the Norwegian State, was formed in 2001 to manage the SDFI assets.

 

3.12.4 Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201745


SDFI oil and gas marketing and sale

Statoil markets and sells the Norwegian State's oil and gas together with Statoil’s own production. The arrangement has been implemented by the Norwegian State.

 

At an extraordinary general meeting held on 27 February 2001, the Norwegian State, as sole shareholder, revised Statoil’s articles of association by adding a new article that requires Statoil to continue to market and sell the Norwegian State's oil and gas together with its own oil and gas. At an extraordinary general meeting held on 25 May 2001, the Norwegian State, as sole shareholder, approved an instruction to Statoil setting out specific terms for the marketing and sale of the Norwegian State's oil and gas. This resolution is referred to as the Owner's instruction.

 

The Norwegian State has a coordinated ownership strategy aimed at maximisingStatoil is obliged under the aggregate value of its ownership interests in StatoilOwner's instruction to jointly market and sell the Norwegian State's oil and gas as well as Statoil’s own oil and gas. This is reflected in the Owner's instruction. It contains a general requirement that, in Statoil’s activities on the NCS, it must take account of these ownership interests in decisions that could affect the execution of this marketing arrangement.

The principal provisions of the Owner's instruction are set out below.

Objectives

62Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The overall objective of the marketing arrangement is to obtain the highest possible total value for Statoil’s oil and gas and the Norwegian State's oil and gas, and to ensure an equitable distribution of the total value creation between the Norwegian State and Statoil.

Statoil’s tasks

Statoil’s main tasks under the Owner's instruction are to market and sell the Norwegian State's oil and gas and to carry out all the necessary related activities, other than those carried out jointly with other licensees under production licences. This includes, but is not limited to, responsibility for processing, transport and marketing.

Costs

The Norwegian State does not pay Statoil a specific consideration for performing these tasks, but reimburses its proportionate share of certain costs, which, under the Owner's instruction, may be Statoil’s actual costs or an amount specifically agreed.

Price mechanisms

Payment to the Norwegian State for sales of the Norwegian State's natural gas, both to Statoil and to third parties, is based either on the prices achieved, a net back formula or market value. Statoil purchases all of the Norwegian State's oil and NGL. Pricing of the crude oil is based on market-reflective prices. NGL prices are based on either achieved prices, market value or market-reflective prices.

Lifting mechanism

To ensure neutral weighting between the Norwegian State's and Statoil’s own natural gas volumes, a list has been established for deciding the lifting priority between each individual field. The different fields are ranked in accordance with their assumed total value creation for the Norwegian State and Statoil, assuming that all of the fields meet our profitability requirements if we participate as a licensee and the Norwegian State's profitability requirements if the State is a licensee. Within each individual field in which both the Norwegian State and Statoil are licensees, the Norwegian State and Statoil will deliver volumes and share income in proportion to our respective participating interests.

The Norwegian State's oil and NGL is lifted together with our oil and NGL in accordance with applicable lifting procedures for each individual field and terminal.

Withdrawal or amendment

The Norwegian State may at any time utilise its position as majority shareholder of Statoil to withdraw or amend the owner's instruction.marketing instruction

 

3.12.5 HSE regulation

Statoil’s petroleum operations are subject to extensive laws and regulations relating to health, safety and the environment (HSE).

 

With business operations in more than 30 countries, Statoil is subject to a wide variety of HSE laws and regulations concerning its products, operations and activities. Laws and regulations may be jurisdiction specific, but also international regulations, conventions or treaties, as well as EU directives and regulations, are relevant.

 

In Norway, underStatoil continues to monitor and respond to the Norwegian Petroleum ActTrump Administration’s ongoing reorganization of 29 November 1996, Statoil’s oil and gas operations must be conducted in compliance with a reasonable standard of care, taking into considerationregulatory bodies, including potentially the safety of employees, the environment and the economic values represented by installations and vessels. The Petroleum Act specifically requires that petroleum operations be carried out in such a manner that a high level of safety is maintained and developed in step with technological developments. Statoil is also required at all times to have a plan to deal with emergency situations in our petroleum operations. During an emergency, the Norwegian Ministry of Labour/Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs/Norwegian Coastal Administration may decide that other parties should provide the necessary resources, or otherwise adopt measures to obtain the necessary resources, to deal with the emergency for the licensees' account.

As a result of the Macondo incident, in 2011, the US Department of the Interior created two new agencies(DOI), an effort which is designed to administer operationsstreamline processes and activities in the Gulf of Mexico - the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the Bureau of Offshore Energy Management (BOEM). The department also issued new regulations to address the respective roles of the new agencies. Application of these regulations has the potential to affectreduce duplications. Potential implications on Statoil’s operations in the US.US will be assessed as this regulatory review process develops.  At this time, Statoil does not consider any of these potential changes to have a material impact on its US activities. Similarly, the effects from implementing the EU offshore Safety Directive in EU-member states' legislation will affect operations in relevant EU member countries.

See also section 5.12.11 Risk factors.review under Risk factors.

 

3.12.6 Taxation of Statoil

Statoil is subject to ordinary Norwegian corporate income tax and to a special petroleum tax relating to its offshore activities in Norway. Internationally, Statoil’s activities are mainly subject to tax in the countries where it operates.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201563


Taxation in Norway

Statoil's Norwegian petroleum activities are subject to ordinary corporate income tax and to a special petroleum tax. In addition, there are taxes on both carbon dioxide emissions and emissions of nitrogen oxide (NOx).

Corporate income tax

Statoil’s profits, both from offshore oil and natural gas activities and from onshore activities, are subject to Norwegian corporate income tax. The standard corporate income tax rate has been reduced from 27%24% in 20152017 to 25%23% in 2016. Statoil’s profits are computed in accordance with ordinary Norwegian corporate income tax rules, subject to certain modifications that apply to companies engaged in petroleum operations. Gross revenue from oil production is determined on the basis of norm prices. Norm prices are decided on2018. In addition, a daily basis by the Petroleum Price Board, and published quarterly. The Petroleum Tax Act states that the norm prices shall correspond to the prices that could have been obtained in a sale of petroleum between independent parties in a free market.

The maximum rate of depreciation of development costs relating to offshore production installations and pipelines is 16.67% per year. Depreciation starts when the cost is incurred. Exploration costs may be deducted in the year in which they are incurred. Financial costs related to the offshore activity are calculated directly based on a formula set out in the Petroleum Tax Act. The financial costs deductible under the offshore tax regime are the total interest costs and exchange gains and losses related to interest-bearing debt multiplied by 50% of the tax values covered by the petroleum tax regime divided by the average interest-bearing debt. All other financial costs and income are allocated to the onshore tax regime.

Abandonment costs incurred can be deducted as operating expenses. Provisions for future abandonment costs are not tax deductible.

Any tax losses can be carried forward indefinitely against subsequent income earned. 50% of losses relating to activity conducted onshore in Norway can be deducted from NCS income subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016). Losses on foreign activities cannot be deducted from NCS income.

By using group contributions between Norwegian companies in which Statoil holds more than 90% of the shares and votes, tax losses and taxable income can be offset to a great extent. Group distributions are not deductible from Statoil’s NCS income.

Dividends received are subject to tax in Norway. The basis for taxation is 3% of the dividends received, which is subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016). Dividends received from Norwegian companies and from similar companies resident in the EEA for tax purposes, in which the recipient holds more than 90% of the shares and votes, are fully exempt from tax. Dividends from companies resident in the EEA that are not similar to Norwegian companies, companies in low-tax countries and portfolio investments outside the EEA will, under certain circumstances, be subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016) based on the full amounts received.

Capital gains from the realisation of shares are exempt from tax. Exceptions apply to shares held in companies resident in low-tax countries or portfolio investments in companies resident outside the EEA for tax purposes, where, under certain circumstances, capital gains will be subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016) and capital losses will be deductible.

Special petroleum tax

A special petroleum tax is levied on profits from petroleum production and pipeline transportation on the NCS. The special petroleum tax rate has been increased from 51%54% in 20152017 to 53%55% in 2016.2018. The special petroleum tax rate is applied to relevant income in addition to the standard income tax rate, resulting in a 78% marginal tax rate on income subject to the special petroleum tax. The basis for computing the special petroleum tax is the same as for income subject to ordinary corporate income tax, except that onshore losses are not deductible from the special petroleum tax basis, and a tax-free allowance, or uplift, is granted at a rate of 5.5% per year. The uplift is computed on the basis of the original capitalised cost of offshore production installations. The uplift can be deducted from taxable income for a period of four years, starting in the year in which the capital expenditure is incurred. Unused uplift can be carried forward indefinitely. For further information, see note 9 Income taxes.taxes to the Consolidated financial statements.

 

Taxation outside Norway

Statoil's international petroleum activities are subject to tax pursuant to local legislation. Fiscal regulation of Statoil’s upstream operations is generally based on corporate income tax regimes and/or production sharing agreements (PSA). Royalties may apply in either case. PSAs. Statoil is subject to excess (or "windfall") profit tax in someexpects the impact of the countriesrecently enacted US tax reform to be favourable to Statoil and its US operations, primarily due to the reduction in which it produces crude oilthe US corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. This change in US tax legislation (effective 1 January 2018) will have no impact on Statoil’s deferred tax balance as Statoil has not recognised any net deferred tax asset or condensate.liability related to our US operations as of 31 December 2017. See note 9 Income taxes and note 10 Property, plant and equipment to the Consolidated financial statements.

SUBSIDIARIES AND PROPERTIES

Significant subsidiaries

The following table shows significant subsidiaries and equity accounted companies within Statoil group as of 31 December 2017.

  

Production sharing agreements (PSA)

Under a PSA, the host government typically retains the right to the hydrocarbons in place. The contractor normally receives a share of the oil produced to recover its costs, and is also entitled to an agreed share of the oil as profit ("profit oil"). The state's share of profit oil typically increases based on a success factor, such as surpassing certain specified internal rates of return, production rates or accumulated production. The contractor is usually subject to income tax on its own share of the profit oil. Normally, the contractors carry the exploration costs and risk prior to a commercial discovery and are then entitled to recover those costs during the production phase. Fiscal provisions in a PSA are to a large extent negotiable and are unique to each PSA.

Income tax regimes

Under an income tax/royalty regime, companies are granted licences by the government to extract petroleum, and the state may be entitled to royalties, which are generally assessed on gross revenue from production, and a profit tax, which is generally based on the company's net taxable income from production as defined in a country's domestic tax legislation. In some countries, income from petroleum activities is also

Name

in %

Country of incorporation

 

Name

in %

Country of incorporation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statholding AS (Group)

100

Norway

 

Statoil Natural Gas LLC

100

USA

Statoil Angola Block 15 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil New Energy (Group)

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 17 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Nigeria AS

100

Norway

Statoil Angola Block 31 AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil Nigeria Ltd

100

Nigeria

Statoil Apsheron AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil North Africa Gas AS

100

Norway

Statoil Brasil Oleo e Gas (Group)

100

Brazil

 

Statoil North Africa Oil AS

100

Norway

Statoil BTC (Group)

100

Norway

 

Statoil Oil & Gas Brazil AS

100

Norway

Statoil Canada Ltd (Group)

100

Canada

 

Statoil OTS AB

100

Sweden

Statoil Colombia B.V.

100

Netherlands

 

Statoil Petroleum AS

100

Norway

Statoil Coordination Center NV

100

Belgium

 

Statoil Refining Norway AS

100

Norway

Statoil Danmark (Group)

100

Denmark

 

Statoil Sverige Kharyaga AB

100

Sweden

Statoil Deutschland GmbH (Group)

100

Germany

 

Statoil Tanzania AS

100

Norway

Statoil Dezassete AS

100

Norway

 

Statoil UK Ltd (Group)

100

United Kingdom

Statoil do Brasil Ltda

100

Brazil

 

Statoil US Holding Inc. (Group)

100

USA

Statoil Energy NL B.V.

100

Netherlands

 

Sincor Netherlands B.V.

100

Netherlands

Statoil Exploration Ireland Ltd

100

Ireland

 

South Atlantic Holding B.V.

60

Netherlands

Statoil Forsikring AS

100

Norway

 

AWE-Arkona-Windpark Entwicklungs-GmbH1)

50

Germany

Statoil Holding Netherlands B.V.

100

Netherlands

 

Naturkraft AS

50

Norway

Statoil International Netherlands B.V.

100

Netherlands

 

Lundin Petroleum AB1)

20

Sweden

Statoil Kharyaga AS

100

Norway

 

 

 

 

Statoil Murzuq AS

100

Norway

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) Equity accounted entities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

6446   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

subject to a special petroleum tax in addition to ordinary corporate tax. In general, the fiscal terms surrounding these licences are non-negotiable and the company is subject to legislative changes in the tax laws.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    6547


 

3.13 Property, plant and equipment

Statoil has interests in real estate in many countries throughout the world. However, no individual property is significant.

The largest office buildings are theStatoil's head office is located at Forusbeen 50, NO-4035, Stavanger, Norway andwhich comprises approximately 135,000 square metresmeters of office space. In June 2015 Statoil closed a sales transaction forspace, and the sale of the company’s head office building in Stavanger, and at the same time, Statoil entered into a 15 year operating lease agreement for the building. For more information see note 4 Acquisitions and disposalsto the Consolidated financial statements.

In October 2012, Statoil moved into a new 65,500-square-65,500 square metre office building located at Fornebu on the outskirts of Norway's capital Oslo. Statoil as tenant has signed a long-term lease agreement with the owner of theBoth office building, IT-Fornebu AS. The new office building provides an environmentally friendly workplace for up to 2,500 employees.buildings are leased.

 

For a description of our significant reserves and sources of oil and natural gas, see note 27Proved oil and gas reserves in section 2.8 Operational performance and section 4.2 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited) later in this report. For a description of our operational refineries, terminals and processing plants, see section 2.5 MMP – Marketing, Midstream and Processing.












































Related party transactions

See note 24 Related partiesto the Consolidated financial statements. See also section 3.4 Equal treatment of shareholders and transactions with close associates.

 

3.14 Related party transactionsInsurance

See note 24 Related parties to the Consolidated financial statements for information concerning related parties.

3.15 Insurance

Statoil maintains insurance coverage that includes coverage for physical damage to its oil and gas properties, third-party liability, workers' compensation and employers' liability, general liability, sudden pollution and other coverage. See also section 2.11 Risk review under Risk factors.

48Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


2.8 OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE

PROVED OIL AND GAS RESERVES

Proved oil and gas reserves were estimated to be 5,367mmboe at year end 2017, compared to 5,013 mmboe at the end of 2016.


 

Statoil's insurance coverage includes deductibles that must be met prior to recovery. Statoil's external insurance is subject to caps, exclusionsproved reserves are estimated and limitations,presented in accordance with the Securities and there is no assurance that such coverage will adequately protect Statoil against liability from all potential consequencesExchange Commission (SEC) Rule 4-10 (a) of Regulation S-X, revised as of January 2009, and damages.

Our well controlrelevant Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DI) and Staff Accounting Bulletins, as issued by the SEC staff. For additional information, see Proved oil and gas reserves in note 2 Significant accounting policies which cover costs relating to well control incidents (including pollution and clean-up costs) are subject to the following limits for the two of the areas Statoil operates:

NCS

Consolidated financial statements. For further details on proved reserves, see also section ·4.2 Supplementary oil and gas informationNOK 2,500 million plus USD 1,500 million per incident for exploration wells

·NOK 2,000 million per incident for production wells

 

GulfChanges in proved reserves estimates are most commonly the result of Mexico

·Local well control limit (typicallyrevisions of estimates due to observed production performance, extensions of proved areas through drilling activities or the inclusion of proved reserves in new discoveries through the sanctioning of new development projects. These are sources of additions to proved reserves that are the result of continuous business processes and can be expected to continue to add reserves in the areafuture.

Proved reserves can also be added or subtracted through the acquisition or disposal of USD 300 million) plus USD 1,500assets. Changes in proved reserves can also be due to factors outside management control, such as changes in oil and gas prices. Lower oil and gas prices normally allow less oil and gas to be recovered from the accumulations. However, for fields with PSAs and similar contracts, a reduced oil price may result in higher entitlement to the produced volume. These changes are included in the revisions category in the table below.

The principles for booking proved gas reserves are limited to contracted gas sales or gas with access to a robust gas market.

In Norway, the UK and Ireland, Statoil recognises reserves as proved when a development plan is submitted, as there is reasonable certainty that such a plan will be approved by the regulatory authorities. Outside these territories, reserves are generally booked as proved when regulatory approval is received, or when such approval is imminent. Reserves from new discoveries, upward revisions of reserves and purchases of proved reserves are expected to contribute to maintaining proved reserves in future years. Undrilled well locations US onshore are generally booked as proved undeveloped reserves when a development plan has been adopted and the well locations are scheduled to be drilled within five years.

Approximately 91% of our proved reserves are located in OECD countries. Norway is by far the most important contributor in this category, followed by the United States (US), Canada and Ireland. Of Statoil's total proved reserves, 6% are related to PSAs in non-OECD countries such as Azerbaijan, Angola, Algeria, Nigeria, Libya and Russia. Other non-OECD reserves are related to concessions in Brazil, representing 3% of Statoil's total proved reserves. These are included in proved reserves in the Americas.


Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201749


Significant changes in our proved reserves in 2017 were:

Revisions of previously booked reserves, including the effect of improved recovery, increased the proved reserves by 605 million per incidentboe in 2017. Many producing fields have significant positive revisions due to better performance, maturing of new wells and improved recovery projects, as well as reduced uncertainty due to further drilling and production experience. The effect of the increased commodity prices, increasing the proved reserves by approximately 200 million boe through extended economic life time on several fields, is also included in this. The largest revisions are seen in Norway, where many of the larger offshore fields continue to decline less than assumed for exploration wellsthe proved reserves, and in the US where continued drilling and production from the onshore plays in the Appalachian basin (Marcellus and Utica), Bakken and Eagle Ford has increased the proved reserves.

·      Local well control limit (typicallyA total of 441 million boe of new proved reserves are added through extensions and new discoveries booking proved reserves for the first time. New field developments in Norway, such as Johan Castberg, Ærfugl and Bauge, and Peregrino Phase 2 in Brazil all contribute to this with a total of 260 million boe. Extensions of the proved areas in the areaUS onshore plays contribute with167 million boe. The remaining 14 million boe come from other minor extensions on producing fields where new wells have been drilled in previously unproven areas.

New discoveries with proved reserves booked in 2017 are all expected to start production within a period of USD 300 million) forfive years.

A total of 50 million boe of new proved reserves were purchased in 2017 (the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli PSA extension and transfer of certain ownership shares in the Appalachian basin from Northwood Energy).

Sale of 38 million boe of proved reserves from the Leismer oil sands development in Canada which was finalised in 2017.

The 2017 entitlement production wellswas 705 million boe, an increase of 4.7% compared to 2016.

  

The above limits assume a 100% ownership interest in a given well and would scaled to be equivalent to our percentage ownership interest in a given well. In addition to the well control insurance programmes, we have in place a third-party liability insurance programme with a gross limit of USD 800 million per incident.

Proved reserves as of 31 December 2017

Proved reserves

Oil and Condensate

NGL

Natural Gas

Total oil and gas

(mmboe)

(mmboe)

(bcf)

(mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 

 

 

 

Norway

514

199

8,852

2,290

Eurasia excluding Norway

55

-

159

83

Africa

173

10

273

231

US

252

68

1,675

619

Americas excluding US

118

-

-

118

Total Developed proved reserves

1,112

278

10,958

3,342

 

 

 

 

 

Undeveloped

 

 

 

 

Norway

919

80

3,501

1,623

Eurasia excluding Norway

42

-

-

42

Africa

12

-

37

19

US

99

21

577

223

Americas excluding US

119

-

-

119

Total Undeveloped proved reserves

1,191

101

4,115

2,025

 

 

 

 

 

Total proved reserves

2,302

379

15,073

5,367

 

 

 

 

 

6650   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

3.16 People


Proved reserves in Norway

A total of 3,913 million boe is recognised as proved reserves in 64 fields and field development projects on the group



3.16.1 EmployeesNCS, representing 73% of Statoil's total proved reserves. Of these, 53 fields and field areas are currently in Statoilproduction, 42 of which are operated by Statoil.

 

The Statoil group employs approximately 21,600 employees. Of these, approximately 19,000 are employedFour new field development projects added reserves categorised as extensions and discoveries during 2017, Johan Castberg, Bauge, Ærfugl and Alun-Epidot. Production experience, further drilling and improved recovery on several of Statoil's producing fields in Norway and approximately 2,600also contributed positively to the revisions of the proved reserves in outside Norway.2017.

 

 

Number of employees

Women

Permanent employees and percentage of women in the Statoil group

2015

2014

2013

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

 18,977  

 19,670  

 20,336  

30%

30%

30%

Rest of Europe

 855  

 909  

 935  

29%

31%

30%

Africa

 98  

 117  

 140  

35%

34%

33%

Asia

 97  

 135  

 140  

36%

52%

53%

North America

 1,265  

 1,375  

 1,559  

35%

34%

35%

South America

 289  

 310  

 303  

38%

40%

38%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 21,581  

 22,516  

 23,413  

30%

31%

31%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-OECD

 590  

 677  

 690  

40%

40%

39%



Total workforce by region, employment type and new hires in the Statoil group in 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geographical Region

Permanent employees

Consultants

Total Workforce1)

Consultants (%)

Part time (%)

New hires

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

 18,977  

 424  

 19,401  

2%

3%

103

Rest of Europe

 855  

 99  

 954  

10%

1%

70

Africa

 98  

 5  

 103  

5%

NA

6

Asia

 97  

 5  

 102  

5%

NA

2

North America

 1,265  

 112  

 1,377  

8%

0%

142

South America

 289  

 3  

 292  

1%

0%

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 21,581  

 648  

 22,229  

3%

3%

331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-OECD

 590  

 15  

 605  

2%

na

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Enterprise personnel, defined as third-party service providers who work at our onshore and offshore operations, are not included. These were roughly estimated to be around 30,500 in 2015.

Proved reserves in equity accounted companies in Norway represent Statoil’s relative share of Lundin’s share in fields carrying proved reserves, only where Statoil works systematicallyas a shareholder has sufficient access to data to be able to estimate proved reserves with recruitment and development programmes in order to build a diverse workforce by attracting, recruiting and retaining people of both genders and different nationalities and age groups across all types of positions.reasonable certainty.

 

In 2015, 19% of employeesOf the proved reserves on the NCS, 2,290 million boe, or 59%, are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 56% are gas reserves related to large offshore gas fields such as Troll, Snøhvit, Oseberg, Ormen Lange, Visund, Aasta Hansteen, Åsgard and 22% of our managerial staff held nationalities other than Norwegian. Outside Norway, Statoil aims to increase the number of peopleTyrihans, and managers who44% are locally recruited and to reduce the long-term use of expats in business operations. In 2015, 73% of new hires in Statoil were non-Norwegians and 35% were women.liquid reserves.

 

Proved reserves in Eurasia, excluding Norway

In this area, Statoil has proved reserves of 125 million boe related to four fields in Azerbaijan, Ireland, United Kingdom and Russia. Eurasia excluding Norway represents 2% of Statoil's total proved reserves, Azerbaijan being the main contributor with the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli fields. All fields are producing. Of the proved reserves in Eurasia, 83 million boe or 67% are proved developed reserves.

Of the total turnover rate for 2015 was 3.6%. On 31 December 2015, the Statoil group employed 21.581 permanent employeesproved reserves in this area, 77% are liquid reserves and 3% of the workforce worked part-time. In the annual organisational and working environment survey, which continued to have a high response of 85%, our employees reported an overall satisfaction of 4.6. This is a slight increase from the score of 4.5 in 2014.23% are gas reserves.

 

Our people performance data relates to permanent employees in our direct employment. Statoil defines consultants as contracted personnel that are mainly based in our offices. Temporary employees and enterprise personnel are not included in the workforce table. Enterprise personnel are defined as third party service providers and work on our on-shore and off-shore operations. These were roughly estimated to be around 30,500 in 2015. The information about people policies applies to Statoil ASA and its subsidiaries.


Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    6751


 

3.16.2 Equal opportunities

We are committed to building a workplace that promotes diversity and inclusion through its people

processes and practices.

We promote diversity among our employees. We try to create the same opportunities for everyone and do not tolerate discrimination or harassment of any kind in our workplace. In 2015, we continued to focus on strengthening women in leadership and professional positions and on building broad international experience in our workforce. Our commitment to diversity and inclusion was demonstrated in the 2015 Global People Survey, where we maintained our high score of 5.1 (6 being the highest) for the existence of zero tolerance for discrimination and harassment within the workplace.

In 2015, the overall percentage of women in the company was 30%. The percentage of women in the board of directors is 50% (67% among the employee representatives and 43% among members elected by the shareholders). In the corporate executive committee the female representation has increased from last year’s 11% to 18% in 2015. We pay close attention to male-dominated positions and discipline areas, and in 2015 the proportion of female engineers remained stable at 27% in Statoil ASA. Among staff engineers with up to 20 years' experience, the proportion of women increased to 31%. We continue to strive to increase the number of female managers through our development programmes, and in 2015 despite the overall reduction of 181 leadership positions, we increased the share of women in management by 0.5%. The percentage of appointment of women in new leadership positions in 2015 was 36%.

At Statoil we reward our people on the basis of their performance, giving equal emphasis to delivery and behaviour. Our reward approach is adapted to local market conditions at the locations in which we operate and is transparent, non-discriminatory and supports equal opportunities. Given the same position, experience and performance, our employees will be at the same remuneration level relative to the local market. This is demonstrated in the salary ratio between women and men at different levels in Statoil ASA. In 2015 we have maintained a high ratio, with an average of 98%.

The intake of apprentices in Norway is an important part of the company's recruitment of skilled workers and commitment to the education and training of young technicians and operators in the oil and gas industry. In 2015, apprenticeships were given to 130 new students; of these 42 were female. The total number of apprentices in Statoil is 282.

3.16.3 Unions and representatives

Statoil's cooperation with employee representatives and trade unions is based on confidence, trust and continuous dialogue between management and the people in various cooperative bodies.

 

In

Proved reserves in Africa

Statoil ASA, 70%recognises proved reserves of 250 million boe related to 28 fields and field developments in several West and North African countries, including Algeria, Angola, Libya and Nigeria. Africa represents 5% of Statoil's total proved reserves. Angola is the primary contributor to the proved reserves in this area, with 24 of the employees28 fields.



In Angola, Statoil has proved reserves in the
parent company are members of a trade union. Work councilsBlock 15, Block 17 and working environment committees are established where required by law or agreement. Town hall meetings are also used for information and consultations in accordanceBlock 31, with requirements and usage in each country.production from all three blocks.

 

In Norway, the formal basis for collaboration with labour unions is establishedAlgeria and Nigeria, all fields are in the Basic Agreements between the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) and the corresponding respective national labour confederations (unions).

Statoil promotes good employee and industrial relations practices through various networks and forums, including IndustriALL Global Union (IndustriAll) and International Labour Organisation (ILO).

production. In 2015, management and employee representatives collaborated closely,Libya, Murzuq started producing again in particular on the three corporate change initiatives Statoil technical efficiency programme (STEP), Organisational efficiency programme (OE) and Corporate Review 2015. In addition, the European Works Council continued to be an important channel between the company and employees.

We collaborate with employee representatives in the change processes, and we strive to find solutions that are satisfactory both for our employees and for the company. To handle redundancies resulting from the ongoing change processes in 2015, we used measures such as internal deployment, severance packages and early retirement.

2017.

6852   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


3.17 Safety, security and sustainability

Statoil’s ambition is to be an industry leader in safety, security and carbon efficiency.

Safety and security

Statoil’s ambition is to ensure safe and secure operations that protect people, the environment, communities and assets. Statoil’s approach to safety and security entails preventing accidents and incidents, avoiding oil spills, ensuring a healthy work environment and developing a strong security culture.

Statoil works closely with industry peers on incident prevention and emergency preparedness. Through assurance activities, and by analysing Statoil’s own incidents along with those of the industry at large, Statoil aims to ensure a dynamic approach to safety and security performance management. A global oil spill response system has been established, which includes close collaboration with industry peers and national and local communities. Trained response teams and sufficient equipment are ready to be mobilised when and where needed.

Everyone working for Statoil, and in the joint ventures controlled by Statoil, is required to comply with Statoil’s safety, health and security standards. Statoil actively engages with contractors and joint ventures to encourage the embedding of a strong safety and security culture in the workforce.

Statoil uses serious incident frequency (SIF) as a key indicator to monitor safety performance. This indicator (number of serious incidents, including near misses, per million hours worked) combines actual consequences of incidents and the potential for incidents to develop into serious or major accidents. The SIF has significantly improved over the last years, from 1.1 incidents per million hours worked in 2011 to 0.6 incidents per million hours worked in 2015.

Total recordable injuries per million hours worked (TRIF) improved from 3.0 in 2014 to 2.7 in 2015.  The TRIF for Statoil’s employees was 2.3 and the TRIF for Statoil’s contractors was 2.8.

Regrettably, there were three fatalitiesrelated to Statoil’s operations in 2015. One person died and two persons were injured as a result of a breaking wave that hit the drilling rig COSL Innovator on 30 December 2015. Two separate road accidents in the USA resulted in two fatalities.

Accidental oil spills were significantly reduced from 2014 to 2015. The total volume spilt was 23 m³ in 2015, down from 125 m³ in 2014.

Preventing oil and gas leakages is important to avoid major accidents. In 2015, the total number of serious leakages (leakages above 0.1kg/sec) increased to 21, up from 13 in 2014. All leakages are undergoing formal investigations and in-depth studies in order to capture learning and prevent similar incidents in the future.

Security is a key issue for the oil and gas industry because it operates in many unstable regions. At Statoil, security risk is systematically assessed on a continuous basis in order to achieve effective and proportionate security risk management. No security incidents with major consequences for Statoil were recorded in 2015. The two-year Security Improvement Programme, established to significantly raise security capabilities and develop a stronger security culture, was finished on schedule in 2015. A road map has been established to further strengthen our security culture and capabilities by 2020.

Climate change

Statoil recognises the ambition to limit the average global temperature rise to below two degrees centigrade compared to pre-industrial levels. The Paris agreement on climate change negotiated at the UN Conference of Parties (COP21) in December 2015 provides the prospect of improved policy support around the world for accelerating the shift to low carbon solutions. Statoil welcomes the agreement and believes that the company is well positioned to play its part.

Statoil’s approach to climate change entails four key aspects:

·supporting the development of viable global climate policies

·managing climate risks and opportunities

·managing emissions

·developing low carbon energy solutions

Statoil carefully monitors and assesses the potential impact of climate change. Both the corporate executive committee and board of directors frequently discuss the business risks and opportunities associated with climate change, including market, regulatory and physical risk factors. Tools such as internal carbon pricing, scenario planning and stress testing of projects against various oil and gas price assumptions, are used. Statoil regularly assesses how the development of technologies and changes in regulations, including the introduction of stringent climate policies, may impact the oil price, the costs of developing new oil and gas assets, and the demand for oil and gas.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201569


 

 

Statoil’s efforts to reduce direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions includes improving energy efficiency; reducing methane emissions; eliminating routine flaring and scaling up carbon capture and storage.

The production from Statoil-operated assets increased from 997 mmboe in 2014 to 1073 mmboe in 2015. [1]
The
total direct GHG emissions from Statoil’s operated assets remained stable at 16.3 million tonnes CO2 equivalents in 2015. GHG emissions include carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4), where CO2 constitutes the largest part (15.4 million tonnes in 2015).

The Agbami equity redetermination in Nigeria implies a reduction of 5.17 percentage points in Statoil’s equity interest in the field. Statoil has proceeded to the court of appeal to have the arbitration award set aside. Final approval in the licence was pending at year end 2017, hence the negative effect on the proved reserves, which is estimated to be less than 10 million boe, is not yet included.

In Algeria, an agreement has been signed which will amend the In Amenas Production Sharing Contract by five years, from 2022 to 2027. The effect on the proved reserves will be included once the amended PSA is approved by the authorities and the effect is known.

Most of the fields in Africa are mature and many are on decline or approaching the expiration date of the current PSA. High production in 2017 combined with limited positive revisions and few IOR projects being sanctioned, resulted in further reduction of the proved reserves in this area.

Of the total proved reserves in Africa, 231 million boe, or 93%, are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 78% are liquid reserves and 22% are gas reserves.


In 2015, Statoil established a 2020 carbon intensity target of 9 kg CO2/boe for its upstream activities. Statoil’s upstream carbon intensity was 10kg CO2/boe in 2015 – less than 60% of the industry average of 18kg as measured by the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (Environmental Performance Indicators, 2014 data).

Indirect (scope 2) GHG emissions were 0.3 million tonnes CO2 equivalents in 2015, using a location based emission factor. Scope 3 GHG emissions (emissions from the use of Statoil’s equity production) were estimated to 295 million tonnes CO2 equivalents.

Statoil’s operations in Europe are subject to emissions allowances according to the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Statoil’s Norwegian operations are subject to both the Norwegian offshore CO2 tax and EU ETS quotas. In 2015, Statoil paid some NOK 4.0 billion in CO2 tax and quotas.

In 2015, Statoil announced a new business area for New Energy Solutions. Proved reserves in the AmericasStatoil’s approach to growth opportunities within renewables

In North and new energy solutions includes both commercial investments and research and development (R&D).South America, Statoil has made investmentsproved reserves equal to 1,079 million boe in a total of 16 fields and field development projects. This represents 20% of Statoil's total proved reserves. Eleven of these fields are located in the US, eight of which are offshore windfield developments in the Gulf of Mexico and three are onshore tight reservoir assets. Four are located in Canada and one in South America.

As of 30 June 2017, the 9.67% ownership share in the heavy oil project Petrocedeño in Venezuela was reclassified from an equity accounted investment to a non-current financial investment. This has reduced the proved reserves in the Americas by 28 million boe.

In the US, six of the eight fields in the Gulf of Mexico are producing. At year end 2017 field development was still ongoing at Big Foot, and at Stampede which started production in January 2018. The onshore tight reservoir assets in the Appalachian basin, Eagle Ford and Bakken are all in production.

In Canada, proved reserves are related to offshore field developments only.

The increase in proved reserves in this area is mainly due to extensions of the proved areas in the US onshore plays which has added 167 million boe of new proved reserves, positive revisions due to improved operational performance in several assets in the US, and the Peregrino Phase 2 development adding new proved reserves in South America. Proved reserves in the US now represent 16% of total proved reserves and is disclosed as a separate geographic area in the tables.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201753


Of the total proved reserves in the Americas, 737 million boe, or 68%, are proved developed reserves. Of the total proved reserves in this area, 63% are liquid reserves and 37% gas reserves.

Reserves replacement

The reserves replacement ratio is defined as the sum of additions and revisions of proved reserves divided by produced volumes in any given period. The following table presents the changes in reserves including equity accounted entities in each category relating to the reserve replacement ratio for the years 2017, 2016 and 2015. The 2017 reserves replacement ratio excluding equity accounted entities was 1.56 and the corresponding three-year average 1.00. For additional information regarding changes in proved reserves, see section 4.2 Supplementary oil and gas information

The usefulness of the reserves replacement ratio is limited by the volatility of oil prices, the influence of oil and gas prices on PSA reserve booking, sensitivity related to the timing of project sanctions and the time lag between exploration expenditure and the booking of reserves.

 

For the year ended 31 December

Reserves replacement ratio (including purchases and sales)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Annual

1.50

0.93

0.55

Three-year-average

1.00

0.70

0.81

 

 

 

 

Development of reserves

The total volume of proved reserves increased by 354 million boe in 2017. Positive revisions including improved recovery totalled 605 million boe.

Extensions and discoveries added 441 million boe of new proved reserves in 2017, mainly as undeveloped proved reserves. New development projects such as Bauge, Johan Castberg, Peregrino (Phase 2) and continuesÆrfugl, in addition to be engagedseveral minor extensions on developed assets, added a total of 274 million boe of proved reserves. Further drilling in carbon capturethe Appalachian basin, Bakken and storage. A significant proportionEagle Ford onshore plays in the US increased the proved areas in these assets and added 167 million boe of Statoil’s R&D efforts address energy efficiency, carbon capturenew proved reserves.

The net effect of purchases and renewables. See section 3.8.1 sales completed in 2017, increased the proved reserves by 12 million boe.New Energy Solutions (NES) for more information.

 

Environmental impact and resource efficiency

Statoil is committed to using resources efficiently and strives to apply high standards for waste management, emissions to air and impact on ecosystems – in all operations. Statoil’s fresh water consumption decreased from 14.8 million cubic metres in 2014 to 14.5 million cubic metres in 2015. Improving water efficiency in the onshore activities in North America through means such as water recycling and substituting fresh water with brackish water, is a priority.

Working with suppliers

Statoil is committed to using suppliers who operate consistently in accordance with Statoil’s values and who maintain high standards of safety, security and sustainability. These aspects are incorporated in all phases of the procurement process. All potential suppliers must meet Statoil’s minimum requirements in order to qualify as a supplier and these include safety, security and sustainability criteria.

After awarding a contract, a supplier follow-up strategy is established, based on a risk assessment. Statoil’s expectations regarding safety, security and sustainability are communicated to the supplier in the contract start-up meeting and throughout the contract period. Assurance activities are conducted, such as follow-up meetings, verifications and audits to manage identified risks. Supply chain personnel are trained in safety, security and sustainability risk handling through classroom courses, e-learning courses and awareness sessions.

Human rights

Statoil seeks to conduct its business in a way that is consistent with the ten UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (the UN Guiding Principles), the UN Global Compact principles and the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights. Statoil is committed to respecting internationally recognised human rights as laid out in the International Bill of Human Rights, the International Labour Organisation's 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work, and applicable standards of international humanitarian law.

Throughout 2015, a stand-alone human rights policy was developed, to give greater weight to Statoil’s long-standing commitment to respect human rights. The policy was based on consultations and workshops with relevant experts and stakeholders. A gap analysis has been initiated to identify how Statoil’s human rights processes and practices need to further evolve to reflect the new policy. Human rights aspects are integrated into relevant internal management processes, tools and training. On-going activities, business relationships and new business opportunities are assessed for potential human rights impacts and aspects, following a risk-based approach. In 2015, supplier verification practices were enhanced. Human rights training is provided to employees based on risk and relevance.


 

For the year ended 31 December

Change in proved reserves (million boe)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

605

409

(42)

Extensions and discoveries

441

179

627

Purchase of petroleum-in-place

50

65

13

Sales of petroleum-in-place

(38)

(27)

(235)

 

 

 

 

Total reserve additions

1,059

626

363

Production

(705)

(673)

(662)

 

 

 

 

Net change in proved reserves

354

(47)

(299)

 

 

 

 

[1]Climate and environmental performance data represent total figures from Statoil-operated assets (operational control), except from scope 3 emissions, which are calculated based on Statoil’s equity production.54

702   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


Development of reserves in 2017 (million boe)

Total

Developed

Undeveloped

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

5,013

3,268

1,746

Revisions and improved recovery

605

420

185

Extensions and discoveries

441

95

346

Purchase of reserves-in-place

50

26

24

Sales of reserves-in-place

(38)

(33)

(5)

Production

(705)

(705)

-

Moved from undeveloped to developed

-

271

(271)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

5,367

3,342

2,025

 

 

 

 

In 2017, approximately 271 million boe were converted from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves. The start-up of production from Flyndre and Gina Krog in Norway and Hebron in Canada increased the proved developed reserves by 66 million boe during 2017. The remaining 205 million boe of the converted volume is related to activities on developed assets. Over the last 5 years Statoil has converted 1,931 million boe of proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves.

Net proved developed and undeveloped reserves (million boe)

Oil and Condensate

NGL

Natural gas

Total

(mmboe)

(mmboe)

(bcf)

(mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

Proved reserves end of year

2,302

379

15,073

5,367

 

Developed

1,112

278

10,958

3,342

 

Undeveloped

1,191

101

4,115

2,025

2016

Proved reserves end of year

2,033

372

14,637

5,013

 

Developed

1,105

277

10,584

3,268

 

Undeveloped

928

95

4,054

1,746

2015

Proved reserves end of year

2,091

364

14,624

5,060

 

Developed

1,104

290

11,901

3,515

 

Undeveloped

987

74

2,723

1,546

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of 31 December 2017, the total proved undeveloped reserves amounted to 2,025 million boe, 80% of which are related to fields in Norway. The Troll and Snøhvit fields, which have continuous development activities, together with fields not yet in production, such as Johan Sverdrup, Johan Castberg and Aasta Hansteen have the largest proved undeveloped reserves in Norway. The largest assets with respect to proved undeveloped reserves outside Norway are Peregrino in Brazil, ACG in Azerbaijan and the Appalachian basin and Bakken in the US.

All these fields are either producing, or will start production within the next five years. For fields with proved reserves where production has not yet started, investment decisions have already been sanctioned and investments in infrastructure and facilities have commenced. Some development activities will take place more than five years from the disclosure date, but these are mainly related to incremental type of spending, such as drilling of additional wells from existing facilities, in order to secure continued production. There are no material development projects, which would require a separate future investment decision by management, included in our proved reserves. For our onshore plays in the US, the Appalachian basin, Eagle Ford and Bakken, all proved undeveloped reserves are limited to wells that are scheduled to be drilled within five years.

In 2017, Statoil incurred USD 7,729 million in development costs relating to assets carrying proved reserves, USD 5,685 million of which was related to proved undeveloped reserves.

Additional information about proved oil and gas reserves is provided in section 4.2 Supplementary oil and gas information.

Preparation of reserves estimates

Statoil's annual reporting process for proved reserves is coordinated by a central corporate reserves management (CRM) team consisting of qualified professionals in geosciences, reservoir and production technology and financial evaluation. The team has an average of more than 25 years' experience in the oil and gas industry. CRM reports to the vice president of finance and control in the Technology, Projects & Drilling business area and is thus independent of the Development & Production business areas in Norway, North America and International. All the reserves estimates have been prepared by Statoil's technical staff.

Although the CRM team reviews the information centrally, each asset team is responsible for ensuring that it is in compliance with the requirements of the SEC and Statoil's corporate standards. Information about proved oil and gas reserves, standardised measures of

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201755


 

4 Financial reviewdiscounted net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves and other information related to proved oil and gas reserves, is collected from the local asset teams and checked by CRM for consistency and conformity with applicable standards. The final numbers for each asset are quality-controlled and approved by the responsible asset manager, before aggregation to the required reporting level by CRM.

 

4.1 OperatingThe aggregated results are submitted for approval to the relevant business area management teams and financial review

the corporate executive committee.

 

The person with primary responsibility for overseeing the preparation of the reserves estimates is the manager of the CRM team. The person who presently holds this position has a bachelor's degree in earth sciences from the University of Gothenburg, and a master's degree in petroleum exploration and exploitation from Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. She has 32 years' experience in the oil and gas industry, 31 of them with Statoil. She is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineering (SPE) and vice-chair of the UNECE Expert Group on Resource Classification (EGRC).

DeGolyer and MacNaughton report

Petroleum engineering consultants DeGolyer and MacNaughton have carried out an independent evaluation of Statoil's proved reserves as of 31 December 2017 using data provided by Statoil. The evaluation accounts for 100% of Statoil's proved reserves including equity accounted entities. The aggregated net proved reserves estimates prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton do not differ materially from those prepared by Statoil when compared on the basis of net equivalent barrels.

 

Oil and Condensate

NGL/LPG

Natural Gas

 

Oil Equivalent

Net proved reserves at 31 December 2017

(mmbbls)

(mmbbl)

(bcf)

(mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated by Statoil

2,302

379

15,073

5,367

Estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton

2,363

347

14,404

5,276

 

 

 

 

 

A reserves audit report summarising this evaluation is included as Exhibit 15 (a)(iii).

 

4.1.1 Operational statistics

Developed and undeveloped acreage

The table below shows the total gross and net developed and undeveloped oil and gas acreage, in which Statoil had interests at 31 December 2017.

A gross value reflects the number of wells or acreage in which Statoil owns a working interest. The net value corresponds to the sum of the fractional working interests owned in the same gross wells or acres.

Developed and undeveloped oil and gas acreage at 31 December 2017 (in thousands of acres)

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Oceania

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acreage developed

- gross

927

73

796

689

73

-

2,558

 

- net

345

16

264

170

19

-

814

Acreage undeveloped

- gross

13,708

40,526

24,958

1,574

37,567

11,749

130,082

 

- net

6,016

18,159

9,544

799

15,577

6,928

57,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The largest concentrations of developed acreage in Norway are in the Troll, Skarv, Oseberg area, Snøhvit and Ormen Lange. In Africa, the Algerian gas development projects In Amenas and In Salah represent the largest concentrations of developed acreage (gross and net). Bakken (onshore US) has the largest developed acreage in Americas.

Statoil's largest undeveloped acreage concentration is in Russia with 15% of the total acreage and 48% of the total acreage in Eurasia excluding Norway. A large part of the net acreage in Russia represents Statoil’s share of a joint venture with Rosneft. The largest concentration of undeveloped acreage in the Americas excluding US is Canada, with 25% of the total for this geographic area. In Africa, the largest acreage concentration is in South Africa, representing 69% of the total for this geographic area. In Oceania Statoil holds undeveloped acreage in Australia and New Zealand.

Statoil holds acreage in numerous concessions, blocks and leases. The terms and conditions regarding expiration dates vary significantly from property to property. Work programmes are designed to ensure that the exploration potential of any property is fully evaluated before expiration.

Acreage related to several of these concessions, blocks and leases are scheduled to expire within the next three years. Any acreage which has already been evaluated to be non-profitable may be relinquished prior to the current expiration date. In other cases, Statoil

562Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


may decide to apply for an extension if more time is needed in order to fully evaluate the potential of the properties. Historically, Statoil has generally been successful in obtaining such extensions.

Most of the undeveloped acreage that will expire within the next three years is related to early exploration activities where no production is expected in the foreseeable future. The expiration of these leases, blocks and concessions will therefore not have any material impact on our reserves.

Productive oil and gas wells

The number of gross and net productive oil and gas wells, in which Statoil had interests at 31 December 2017, are shown in the table below. The total number of productive oil wells in the Americas excluding US has been significantly reduced due to the reclassification of the heavy oil project Petrocdeño from an equity accounted entity to a financial investment.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201757


Number of productive oil and gas wells at 31 December 2017

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil wells

- gross

874

188

423

2,422

99

4,006

 

- net

292.7

27.3

66.4

613.8

29.0

1,029.2

Gas wells

- gross

201

6

104

2,213

-

2,524

 

- net

86.7

2.2

40.1

550.0

-

679.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The total gross number of productive wells as of end 2017 includes 392 oil wells and 11 gas wells with multiple completions or wells with more than one branch.


Net productive and dry oil and gas wells drilled

The following tables show the net productive and dry exploratory and development oil and gas wells completed or abandoned by Statoil in the past three years. Productive wells include exploratory wells in which hydrocarbons were discovered, and where drilling or completion has been suspended pending further evaluation. A dry well is one found to be incapable of producing sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.

Net productive and dry oil and gas wells drilled

Norway

Eurasia  excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled

8.1

2.6

-

0.7

1.9

13.3

 

- Net dry exploratory wells drilled

3.5

2.1

-

-

1.9

7.5

 

- Net productive exploratory wells drilled

4.6

0.5

-

0.7

-

5.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry development wells drilled

37.5

5.0

4.3

103.2

2.3

152.2

 

- Net dry development wells drilled

10.1

-

0.1

-

0.1

10.3

 

- Net productive development wells drilled

27.4

5.0

4.2

103.2

2.2

142.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled

5.5

0.7

-

1.6

4.8

12.6

 

- Net dry exploratory wells drilled

1.4

0.7

-

-

1.9

3.9

 

- Net productive exploratory wells drilled

4.1

-

-

1.6

3.0

8.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry development wells drilled

47.4

1.6

5.2

116.6

17.0

187.8

 

- Net dry development wells drilled

4.2

0.2

0.2

-

-

4.6

 

- Net productive development wells drilled

43.3

1.5

4.9

116.6

17.0

183.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry exploratory wells drilled

10.2

1.0

2.5

1.5

1.1

16.3

 

- Net dry exploratory wells drilled

4.6

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.4

6.4

 

- Net productive exploratory wells drilled

5.6

0.7

2.0

1.0

0.7

9.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net productive and dry development wells drilled

32.1

4.1

10.6

216.3

12.5

275.6

 

- Net dry development wells drilled

3.6

-

4.3

0.3

-

8.2

 

- Net productive development wells drilled

28.6

4.1

6.3

215.9

12.5

267.4

 

582Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Exploratory and development drilling in process

The following table shows the number of exploratory and development oil and gas wells in the process of being drilled by Statoil at 31 December 2017.

Number of wells in progress at 31 December 2017

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development wells1)

- gross

39

7

10

362

2

420

 

- net

14.2

0.8

2.9

144.7

0.1

162.7

Exploratory wells

- gross

2

3

-

1

-

6

 

- net

0.8

1.5

-

0.2

-

2.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) Mainly wells related to US onshore developments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Delivery commitments

On behalf of the Norwegian State's direct financial interest (SDFI), Statoil is responsible for managing, transporting and selling the Norwegian state's oil and gas from the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). These reserves are sold in conjunction with Statoil's own reserves. As part of this arrangement, Statoil delivers gas to customers under various types of sales contracts. In order to meet the commitments, we utilise a field supply schedule that ensures the highest possible total value for Statoil and SDFI's joint portfolio of oil and gas.

The majority of our gas volumes in Norway are sold under long-term contracts with take-or-pay clauses. Statoil's and SDFI's annual delivery commitments under these agreements are expressed as the sum of the expected off-take under these contracts. As of 31 December 2017, the long-term commitments from NCS for the Statoil/SDFI arrangement totaled approximately 278 bcm.

Statoil's total bilateral obligations have been reduced over the past year, as a result of delivering more on existing contracts ending in 2017 than sold on new contracts starting in 2017. This has been a trend in later years. Thus, given a steady gas production in the years to come, Statoil will sell more gas in the spot-market than before.

Statoil and SDFI's delivery commitments, expressed as the sum of expected off-take for the calendar years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, are 47.1, 40.1, 37.9 and 34.9 bcm, respectively. Any remaining volumes after covering our bilateral agreements, will be sold by trading activities at the hubs.

Statoil's currently developed gas reserves in Norway are more than sufficient to meet our share of these commitments for the next four years.






PRODUCTION VOLUMES AND PRICES

The business overview is in accordance with our segment's operations as of 31 December 2017, whereas certain disclosures on oil and gas reserves are based on geographical areas as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). For further information about extractive activities, see sections 2.3 E&P Norwayand 2.4 E&P International.

Statoil prepares its disclosures for oil and gas reserves and certain other supplemental oil and gas disclosures by geographical area, as required by the SEC. The geographical areas are defined by country and continent. They are Norway, Eurasia excluding Norway, Africa and the Americas.

For further information about disclosures concerning oil and gas reserves and certain other supplemental disclosures based on geographical areas as required by the SEC, see section 4.2 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited).

Entitlement production

The following table shows Statoil's Norwegian and international entitlement production of oil and natural gas for the periods indicated. The stated production volumes are the volumes to which Statoil is entitled, pursuant to conditions laid down in licence agreements and production-sharing agreements. The production volumes are net of royalty oil paid in kind, and of gas used for fuel and flaring. Our production is based on our proportionate participation in fields with multiple owners and does not include production of the Norwegian State's oil and natural gas. Production of an immaterial quantity of bitumen is included as oil production. NGL includes both LPG and naphtha. For further information on production volumes see section 5.6 Terms and abbreviations.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201759


Entitlement production (million boe)

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 

 

 

 

 

2015

174

13

75

31

27

319

-

-

4

4

324

2016

169

12

72

34

26

313

2

0

4

6

320

2017

165

10

68

38

21

302

6

0

2

8

310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NGL (mmbbls)

 

 

 

 

 

2015

44

-

3

7

-

54

-

-

-

-

54

2016

46

-

2

9

-

58

0

-

-

0

58

2017

48

-

4

9

0

61

-

-

-

-

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas (bcf)

 

 

 

 

 

2015

1,306

16

63

215

0

1,600

-

-

-

-

1,600

2016

1,338

34

60

226

0

1,659

1

0

-

2

1,661

2017

1,515

41

72

240

0

1,868

4

0

-

5

1,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 

 

 

 

 

2015

450

16

88

76

27

658

-

-

4

4

662

2016

454

18

85

83

26

666

3

0

4

7

673

2017

483

17

85

90

21

696

6

0

2

9

705

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The only field containing more than 15% of total proved reserves based on oil equivalent barrels is the Troll field.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entitlement production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Troll field 1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and Condensate (mmbbls)

 

 

 

 

 

14

15

14

NGL (mmbbls)

 

 

 

 

 

2

2

2

Natural gas (bcf)

 

 

 

 

 

384

321

386

Combined oil, condensate, NGL and gas (mmboe)

 

 

 

 

85

74

85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)  Note that Troll is also included in Norway stated above.

 

 

 

 


 

For the year ended 31 December

 

 

Operational data

2017

2016

2015

17-16 change

16-15 change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prices

 

 

 

 

 

Average Brent oil price (USD/bbl)

54.2

43.7

52.4

24%

(17%)

E&P Norway average liquids price (USD/bbl)

50.2

39.4

48.2

27%

(18%)

E&P International average liquids price (USD/bbl)

47.6

35.8

42.9

33%

(17%)

Group average liquids price (USD/bbl)

49.1

37.8

45.9

30%

(18%)

Group average liquids price (NOK/bbl)

405

317

371

28%

(14%)

Transfer price natural gas (USD/mmBtu)

4.33

3.42

5.17

27%

(34%)

Average invoiced gas prices - Europe (USD/mmBtu)

5.55

5.17

7.08

7%

(27%)

Average invoiced gas prices - North America (USD/mmBtu)

2.73

2.12

2.62

28%

(19%)

Refining reference margin (USD/bbl)

6.3

4.8

8.0

31%

(40%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entitlement production (mboe per day)

 

 

 

 

 

E&P Norway entitlement liquids production

594

589

595

1%

(1%)

E&P International entitlement liquids production

415

435

436

(5%)

(0%)

Group entitlement liquids production

1,009

1,024

1,032

(1%)

(1%)

E&P Norway entitlement gas production

740

646

637

15%

1%

E&P International entitlement gas production

173

157

144

10%

9%

Group entitlement gas production

913

803

781

14%

3%

Total entitlement liquids and gas production

1,922

1,827

1,812

5%

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity production (mboe per day)

 

 

 

 

 

E&P Norway equity liquids production

594

589

595

1%

(1%)

E&P International equity liquids production

545

555

569

(2%)

(2%)

Group equity liquids production

1,139

1,144

1,165

(0%)

(2%)

E&P Norway equity gas production

740

646

637

15%

1%

E&P International equity gas production

200

188

170

7%

11%

Group equity gas production

941

834

806

13%

3%

Total equity liquids and gas production

2,080

1,978

1,971

5%

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liftings (mboe per day)

 

 

 

 

 

Liquids liftings

1,012

1,017

1,035

(1%)

(2%)

Gas liftings

936

824

802

14%

3%

Total liquids and gas liftings

1,948

1,842

1,837

6%

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

MMP sales volumes

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil sales volumes (mmbbl)

817

811

829

1%

(2%)

Natural gas sales Statoil entitlement (bcm)

52.0

44.3

44.0

18%

1%

Natural gas sales third-party volumes (bcm)

6.4

8.6

8.6

(26%)

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production cost (USD/boe)

 

 

 

 

 

Production cost entitlement volumes

5.2

5.4

6.5

(3%)

(17%)

Production cost equity volumes 

4.8

5.0

5.9

(3%)

(17%)

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201761


Sales prices

The following tables present realised sales prices.

Realised sales prices

Norway

Eurasia

excluding

Norway

Africa

Americas

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December 2017

 

 

 

 

Average sales price oil and condensate in USD per bbl

54.0

53.6

53.5

46.0

Average sales price NGL in USD per bbl

35.8

-

33.2

20.9

Average sales price natural gas in USD per mmBtu

5.6

5.3

5.2

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December 2016

 

 

 

 

Average sales price oil and condensate in USD per bbl

43.1

42.0

41.4

32.9

Average sales price NGL in USD per bbl

24.4

-

21.9

13.1

Average sales price natural gas in USD per mmBtu

5.2

4.8

4.0

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

Average sales price oil and condensate in USD per bbl

52.2

50.7

49.4

39.4

Average sales price NGL in USD per bbl

30.1

-

26.2

12.5

Average sales price natural gas in USD per mmBtu

7.1

4.6

5.6

2.6

 

 

 

 

 

622Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Sales volumes

Sales volumes include lifted entitlement volumes, the sale of SDFI volumes and marketing of third-party volumes.

In addition to Statoil’s own volumes, we market and sell oil and gas owned by the Norwegian State through the Norwegian State's share in production licences. This is known as the State's Direct Financial Interest or SDFI. For additional information, see section 3.12.42.7 Corporate under SDFI oil and gas marketing and sale.

The following table shows the SDFI and Statoil sales volume information on crude oil and natural gas for the periods indicated. The Statoil natural gas sales volumes include equity volumes sold by the MMP segment, natural gas volumes sold by the DPIE&P International segment and ethane volumes.

 

 

  For the year ended 31 December

Sales Volumes1)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil:2)

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls)3)

 378  

 353  

 347  

Natural gas (bcf)

 1,645  

 1,596  

 1,622  

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

 671  

 637  

 636  

 

 

 

 

 

Third party volumes:4)

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls)3)

 290  

 304  

 303  

Natural gas (bcf)

 304  

 285  

 434  

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

 344  

 355  

 380  

 

 

 

 

 

SDFI assets owned by the Norwegian State:5)

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls)3)

 149  

 148  

 155  

Natural gas (bcf)1)

 1,400  

 1,254  

 1,351  

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

 398  

 371  

 396  

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls)3)

 816  

 805  

 805  

Natural gas (bcf)

 3,348  

 3,134  

 3,407  

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

 1,413  

 1,363  

 1,412  

 

 

 

 

 

1)

The volumes in columns 2014 and 2013 are updated to reflect total sales volumes of crude oil (mmbbls) and natural gas (bcf). Previously only volumes from MMP were disclosed.

2)

The Statoil volumes included in the table above are based on the assumption that volumes sold were equal to lifted volumes in the relevant year. Volumes lifted by DPI but not sold by MMP, and volumes lifted by DPN or DPI and still in inventory or in transit may cause these volumes to differ from the sales volumes reported elsewhere in this report by MMP.

3)

Sales volumes of crude oil include NGL and condensate. All sales volumes reported in the table above include internal deliveries to our manufacturing facilities.

4)

Third party volumes of crude oil include both volumes purchased from partners in our upstream operations and other cargos purchased in the market. The third party volumes are purchased either for sale to third parties or for our own use. Third party volumes of natural gas include third party LNG volumes related to our activities at the Cove Point regasification terminal in the US.

5)

The line item SDFI assets owned by the Norwegian State include sales of both equity production and third party gas.

 

  For the year ended 31 December

Sales Volumes

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil 1)

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls) 2)

369

372

378

Natural gas (bcm)

54.3

48.0

46.6

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

711

674

671

 

 

 

 

 

Third party volumes 3)

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls) 2)

302

294

290

Natural gas (bcm)

6.4

8.6

8.6

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

342

348

344

 

 

 

 

 

SDFI assets owned by the Norwegian State 4)

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls) 2)

147

148

149

Natural gas (bcm)

44.0

39.8

41.8

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

424

398

412

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Crude oil (mmbbls) 2)

819

814

816

Natural gas (bcm)

104.7

96.4

97.0

 

 

 

 

 

Combined oil and gas (mmboe)

1,477

1,420

1,427

 

 

 

 

 

1)

The Statoil volumes included in the table above are based on the assumption that volumes sold were equal to lifted volumes in the relevant year. Volumes lifted by E&P International but not sold by MMP, and volumes lifted by E&P Norway or E&P International and still in inventory or in transit may cause these volumes to differ from the sales volumes reported elsewhere in this report by MMP.

2)

Sales volumes of crude oil include NGL and condensate. All sales volumes reported in the table above include internal deliveries to our manufacturing facilities

3)

Third party volumes of crude oil include both volumes purchased from partners in our upstream operations and other cargos purchased in the market. The third party volumes are purchased either for sale to third parties or for our own use. Third party volumes of natural gas include third party LNG volumes related to our activities at the Cove Point regasification terminal in the US.

 

4)

The line item SDFI assets owned by the Norwegian State includes sales of both equity production and third party.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    7163


 

722.9 FINANCIAL REVIEWStatoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

4.1.2 Group profitGROUP FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

In 2016 and loss analysis

Net2015, our results were heavily influenced by low oil and gas prices, leading to lower earnings and impairment losses. In 2017, prices have been recovering and we are seeing better results. Operational performance has been solid and production is up by 5% in 2017. Cost discipline and efficiency improvements have contributed to the reduced operating income was downcosts. Supported by 86% in 2015, impacted by significantly lowerincreasing prices and increasedbetter operational performance, several previous impairments have been reversed. A negative net impairment losses.income in 2016 of USD 2.9 billion is turned into positive net income of USD 4.6 billion in 2017.

 

For the year ended 31 December

 

 

Operational data

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prices

 

 

 

 

 

Average Brent oil price (USD/bbl)

55.3

98.9

108.7

(44%)

(9%)

Development and Production Norway average liquids price (USD/bbl)

48.2

90.6

101.0

(47%)

(10%)

Development and Production International average liquids price (USD/bbl)

42.9

85.6

98.4

(50%)

(13%)

Group average liquids price (USD/bbl)

45.9

88.6

100.0

(48%)

(11%)

Group average liquids price (NOK/bbl) [1]

370.7

558.5

587.8

(34%)

(5%)

Transfer price natural gas (NOK/scm) [9]

1.58

1.57

1.92

1%

(18%)

Average invoiced gas prices - Europe (NOK/scm) [8]

2.16

2.28

2.45

(5%)

(7%)

Average invoiced gas prices - North America (NOK/scm) [8]

0.79

1.04

0.83

(24%)

25%

Refining reference margin (USD/bbl) [2]

8.0

4.7

4.1

70%

15%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entitlement production (mboe per day)

 

 

 

 

 

Development and Production Norway entitlement liquids production

595

588

591

1%

(1%)

Development and Production International entitlement liquids production

436

383

354

14%

8%

Group entitlement liquids production

1,032

971

945

6%

3%

Development and Production Norway entitlement gas production

637

595

626

7%

(5%)

Development and Production International entitlement gas production

144

163

148

(12%)

10%

Group entitlement gas production

781

758

773

3%

(2%)

Total entitlement liquids and gas production [3]

1,812

1,729

1,719

5%

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity production (mboe per day)

 

 

 

 

 

Development and Production Norway equity liquids production

595

588

591

1%

(1%)

Development and Production International equity liquids production

569

538

524

6%

3%

Group equity liquids production

1,165

1,127

1,115

3%

1%

Development and Production Norway equity gas production

637

595

626

7%

(5%)

Development and Production International equity gas production

170

205

200

(17%)

3%

Group equity gas production

806

801

825

1%

(3%)

Total equity liquids and gas production [4]

1,971

1,927

1,940

2%

(1%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liftings (mboe per day)

 

 

 

 

 

Liquids liftings

1035

967

950

7%

2%

Gas liftings

802

779

792

3%

(2%)

Total liquids and gas liftings

1837

1,746

1,742

5%

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketing, Midstream and Processing sales volumes

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil sales volumes (mmbl)

829

811

809

2%

0%

Natural gas sales Statoil entitlement (bcm)

44.0

43.1

44.3

2%

(3%)

Natural gas sales third-party volumes (bcm)

8.6

8.1

12.3

6%

(34%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production cost (NOK/boe, last 12 months)

 

 

 

 

 

Production cost entitlement volumes

52

55

50

(5%)

10%

Production cost equity volumes 

48

49

44

(2%)

11%

 

Total equityequity liquids and gas production (see section 9 Terms and definitions)was 1,9712,080 mboe, 1,9271,978 mboe, and 1,9401,971 mboe per day in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

 

The 2%5% increase in total equity production from 20142016 to 20152017 was primarily due to start-up and ramp-up on various fields and higher flexible gas sales fromofftake on the NCSand improved operational performance. Expected , partially offset by expected natural decline and divestments.

From 2015 to 2016, the average daily total equity production level was maintained. Increased production from new fields coming on stream, ramp-up on various existing fields and high operational performance, was offset by reduced ownership shares as a result ofdue to divestments and redeterminations partially offset the increase.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201573,


The total equity production in 2014 was slightly lower compared to 2013. Start-up and ramp-up of production on various fields and higher production regularity compared to last year were offset by expected natural decline at mature fields and reduced ownership shares from divestments.

operational challenges.

 

Total entitlement liquids and gas production was 1,922 mboe per day in 2017 compared to 1,827 mboe in 2016 and 1,812 mboe per day in 2015 compared to 1,729 mboe in 2014 and 1,719 mboe per day in 2013.

The2015. In 2017, the total entitlement liquids and gas production in 2015 was up 5% for the samereasons as described above, partially offset by higher negative effect from production sharing agreements (PSA effect) and US royalties, mainly driven by higher prices.

From 2015 to 2016, the total entitlement production was up 1% the reasons as described above. The benefit of a lower effect from production sharing agreements (PSA effect) mainly driven by the reduction in prices, added to the slight increase in entitlement production. From 2013 to 2014 the development in total entitlement production was almost flat for the same reasons as described above and the benefit from lower PSA-effects.

 

The PSAcombined effect of production sharing agreements (PSA effect) and US royalties was 116158 mboe, 157151 mboe and 182159 mboe per day in 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Over time, the volumes lifted and sold will equal ourthe entitlement production, but they may be higher or lower in any period due to differences between the capacity and timing of the vessels lifting our volumes and the actual entitlement production during the period, see section 9 Terms and definitions for more information.period.

 

Income statement under IFRS

For the year ended 31 December

 

For the year ended 31 December

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

 

(restated)

 

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

17-16 change

16-15 change

 

 

 

 

Revenues

465.3

606.8

616.6

(23%)

(2%)

60,971

45,688

57,900

33%

(21%)

Net income from equity accounted investments

(0.3)

0.1

2%

>(100%)

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

188

(119)

(29)

N/A

>(100%)

Other income

17.8

16.1

17.8

11%

(10%)

27

304

1,770

(91%)

(83%)

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

482.8

622.7

634.5

(22%)

(2%)

61,187

45,873

59,642

33%

(23%)

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

(211.2)

(301.3)

(306.9)

(30%)

(2%)

(28,212)

(21,505)

(26,254)

31%

(18%)

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses

(91.9)

(80.2)

(81.9)

15%

(2%)

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses

(9,501)

(9,787)

(11,433)

(3%)

(14%)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(133.8)

(101.4)

(72.4)

32%

40%

(8,644)

(11,550)

(16,715)

(25%)

(31%)

Exploration expenses

(31.0)

(30.3)

(18.0)

2%

69%

(1,059)

(2,952)

(3,872)

(64%)

(24%)

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

14.9

109.5

155.5

(86%)

(30%)

Net operating income/(loss)

13,771

80

1,366

>100%

(94%)

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

(10.6)

(0.0)

(17.0)

>100%

(100%)

(351)

(258)

(1,311)

(36%)

80%

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

4.3

109.4

138.4

(96%)

(21%)

Income/(loss) before tax

13,420

(178)

55

N/A

 

 

 

 

Income tax

(41.6)

(87.4)

(99.2)

(52%)

(12%)

(8,822)

(2,724)

(5,225)

>100%

(48%)

 

 

 

 

Net income

(37.3)

22.0

39.2

>(100%)

(44%)

Net income/(loss)

4,598

(2,902)

(5,169)

N/A

44%

 

 

642Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

Total revenues and other income amounted to NOK 482.8 billionUSD 61,187 million in 20152017 compared to NOK 622.7 billionUSD 45,873 million in 20142016 and NOK 634.5 billionUSD 59,642 million in 2013. 2015.

Revenues are generated from both the sale of lifted crude oil, natural gas and refined products produced and marketed by Statoil, and from the sale of liquids and gas purchased from third parties. In addition, we market and sell the Norwegian State's share of liquids from the NCS. All purchases and sales of the Norwegian State's production of liquids are recorded as Purchasespurchases [net of inventory variations] and Revenues,revenues, respectively, while sales of the Norwegian State's share of gas from the NCS are recorded net.

 For additional information regarding sales, see the Sales volume table in section 2.8 above in this report.

 

Revenues were USD 60,971 million in 2017, up 33% compared to 2016. The 23%increase was mainly due to increased prices both for liquids and gas, and increased gas volumes sold. The 21% decrease in revenues from 20142015 to 20152016 was mainly due to the significant reductiondecrease in both liquids and gas prices, measured in NOK. Strongerlower refinery margins and increased losses from reflecting the changes in 2015fair value of derivatives and higher volumesmarket value of both liquidsstorage and  gas sold partially offset the decrease.physical contracts and a reversal of provisions related to our operations in Angola of USD 754 million. For further information, see note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets to the Consolidated financial statements.

 

The 2% decreaseNet income from equity accounted investments was USD 188 million in revenues2017, up from 2013 to 2014 was mainlya loss in 2016 of USD 119 million due to decreased prices for liquids and European gas and reduced volumesincreased profit from the investment in Lundin Petroleum AB. In 2015, net income from equity accounted investments was a loss of liquids and gas sold, partly offset increased US gas prices andUSD 29 million. For further information, please see note 12 Equity accounted investments to the exchange rate development (USD/NOK). Also, revenues in 2014 were positively impacted by gains from derivatives, mainly due to a significant drop in the forward curve in the oil market.Consolidated financial statements.

 

Other income was NOK 17.8 billionUSD 27 million in 20152017 compared to NOK 16.1 billionUSD 304 million in 20142016 and NOK 17.8 billionUSD 1,770 million in 2013. Other2015. In 2017, other income in 2015was insignificant and mainly related to proceeds from minor insurance claims. In 2016, other income was mainly related to gainsgain from salessale of certainthe Edvard Grieg field on the NCS and proceeds from an insurance settlement. In 2015, other income mainly consisted of gain from the two step divestments of the ownership interest in the Shah Deniz project (NOK 12.4 billion), the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (NOK 1.4 billion) and the Gudrun field (NOK 1.2 billion). Also, gain from sales of office buildings in Norway (NOK 2.1 billion) impacted other income in 2015.Azerbaijan.

 

Other income in 2014 consisted of the gain from the sale of certain ownership interests on the NCS to Wintershall (NOK 5.9 billion) and the divestment of working interests in the Shah Deniz Project and South Caucasus Pipeline (NOK 5.4 billion.) In addition, an arbitration settlement

74Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


(NOK 2.8 billion) following an arbitration ruling in Statoil’s favour, impacted other income in 2014. In 2013, other income consisted of gains from sale of certain ownership interests on the NCS to OMV (NOK 10.1 billion) and Wintershall (NOK 6.4 billion).

As a resultBecause of the factors explained above, total revenue and other income was up by 33% in 2017. In 2016 and 2015, total revenues and other income decreased by 22% in 2015. In 2014, the decrease was 2%.23% and 40%, respectively.

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation] include the cost of liquids purchased from the Norwegian State, which is pursuant to the Owner's instruction, and the cost of liquids and gas purchased from third parties. See section 3.12.4 SDFI oil and gas marketing and salein section 2.7 Corporate for more details.

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation] amounted to NOK 211.2 billionUSD 28,212 million in 20152017 compared to 301.3 billionUSD 21,505 million in 20142016 and NOK 306.9 billionUSD 26,254 million in 2013.

2015. The 30% decrease from 2014 to 201531% increase in 2017 was mainly related to the significant lower prices for liquids and gas and other oil products and a write-down of inventories from cost to market value of NOK 3.9 billion, partially offset by the USD/NOK exchange rate development. increase in prices. The 2%18% decrease from 20132015 to 20142016 was mainly related to lower prices forthe decrease in liquids and gas including the write-down of inventories from cost-to-market value of NOK 4.0 billion and reduced third-party volumes. These effects were partially offset by the USD/NOK exchange rate development.prices.

 

Operating, expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to NOK 91.9 billionUSD 9,501 million in 20152017 compared to NOK 80.2 billionUSD 9,787 million in 2014,2016 and NOK 81.9 billionUSD 11,433 million in 2013.

2015. The 15% increase3% decrease from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly due to divestments and reduced asset retirement provisions, partially offset by net losses from sale of assets and increased costs from new fields coming on stream. Ramp-up on various fields and higher royalty costsalso offset the USD/NOKdecrease.The 14% decrease from 2015 to 2016 was mainly due to cost improvement initiatives and the NOK/USD exchange rate development in 2015 and because a curtailment gain related to the change of pension plan was included in 2014 (discussed below).development. Lower operation and maintenance costs lower royalties due toand reduced liquids prices, lower transportation costs and portfolio changes in addition to positive effects from on-going cost initiatives, partially offset the increase. Excluding the USD/NOK exchange rate development and the effect of the curtailment gain in 2014, operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 3%.

The 2% decrease from 2013 to 2014 was mainly due to a curtailment gain of NOK 3.5 billion recognised upon the decision to change the company’s pension plan in Norway in 2014 and an onerous contract provision of NOK 4.9 billion relatedadded to the Cove Point terminal in the US recognised in 2013. These effects were offset by increased expenses in 2014 mainly due to new fields coming on stream, onshore production ramp-up and increased transportation costs in the North America. In addition, the exchange rate development (NOK/USD) increased the expenses in 2014 compared to 2013.decrease.

 

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses  amounted to NOK 133.8 billion in 2015USD 8,644 million compared to NOK 101.4 billionUSD 11,550 million in 20142016 and NOK 72.4 billionUSD 16,715 million in 2013. 2015.

The 25% decrease in depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses in 2017 was mainly due to lower net impairment of assets in 2017 (discussed below), net increased proved reserves estimates on several fields and a lower depreciation basis due to impairments of assets in previous periods. Start-up and ramp-up of production on new fields partially offset the reduction.

Included in these totalsthe total for 2017 were net impairment reversals of USD 1,055 million, of which impairment reversals amounted to USD 1,972 million mainly related to increased production estimates, cost reductions and increased prices, operational improvements and updated calculation assumptions due to changes in the US tax legislation. The impairment reversals were partially offset by impairment losses of USD 917 million, mainly related to decreased production estimates.

The 31% decrease in 2016 compared to 2015, was mainly due to lower impairment of assets in 2016 and reduced depreciation on mature fields. Higher proved reserves estimate and the NOK/USD exchange rate development in 2016 added to the decrease, partially offset by start-up and ramp-up of production on several fields.

Included in the total for 2016 and 2015, were net impairment losses of NOK 47.8 billion, NOK 26.9 billionUSD 1,301 million and NOK 7.0 billion for 2015, 2014USD 5,526 million, respectively, primarily triggered by the reduction in commodity price assumptions and 2013 respectively, related to the continuously falling commodity forward prices.

Net The net impairment losses of USD 1,301 million in 2016 were mainly related to impairment of unconventional onshore assets in the USA. The net impairment losses of

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017NOK 47.8 billion65


USD 5,526 million in 2015 were mainly related to both unconventional onshore assets in the USA and other conventional offshore assets in the DPIE&P International reporting segment, (NOK 42.7 billion),and conventional offshore assets in the development phase in the DPN segment (NOK 8.7 billion)E&P Norway reporting segment.

For further information, please see note 3 Segments and a net impairment reversal of NOK 3.5 mainly related to a refinery in the MMP segment. See note 11 10 Property, plant and equipment to the Consolidated financial statements for further details.statements.

 

Compared to 2014, the 32% increase in 2015 was mainly due to increased impairment charges primarily as a result of the further declining long-term commodity price assumptions in the first quarter of 2015. In addition, the USD/NOK exchange rate development and start-up and ramp-up of production of several fields added to the increase in depreciation. Reduced overall depreciation because of net impairments of assets in both 2014 and 2015 with a corresponding lower basis for depreciation partially offset the increase.

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses increased by 40% in 2014 compared to 2013, mainly due to impairment losses related to Statoil’s international operations, primarily driven by reduced short-term oil price forecasts. Also, new investments, higher production and increased asset retirement obligation, with a corresponding higher basis for depreciation, partly offset by increased estimates of proved reserves, added to increased depreciation costs in 2014 compared to 2013.

 

Exploration expenses

For the year ended 31 December

 

For the year ended 31 December

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

17-16 change

16-15 change

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenditures (activity)

23.1

23.9

21.8

(3%)

10%

1,234

1,437

2,860

(14%)

(50%)

Expensed, previously capitalised exploration expenditures

1.7

2.4

1.9

(28%)

26%

73

808

213

(91%)

>100%

Capitalised share of current period's exploration activity

(9.2)

(7.3)

(6.9)

27%

6%

(167)

(285)

(1,151)

(41%)

(75%)

Impairments, net of reversals

15.4

11.3

1.2

36%

>100%

Net impairments / (reversals)

(81)

992

1,951

N/A

(49%)

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenses

31.0

30.3

18.0

2%

69%

1,059

2,952

3,872

(64%)

(24%)

 

 

In 2015, exploration expenses were NOK 31.0 billion, a 2% increase compared to 2014 when exploration expenses were NOK 30.3 billion.

In 2013, exploration expenses were NOK 18.0 billion

662Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    75


 

In 2017, exploration expenses were USD 1,059 million, a 64% decrease compared to 2016 when exploration expenses were USD 2,952 million. Exploration expenses were up 2%USD 3,872 million in 2015.

The 64% decrease in exploration expenses in 2017 was mainly due to a lower portion of expenditures capitalised in previous years being expensed in 2017 compared to 2016. Exploration activity was higher in 2017. However, as the exploration wells drilled in 2017 were less expensive due to improved drilling efficiency, exploration expenditures were reduced in 2017 compared to 2016. Net impairment reversals of exploration prospects and signature bonuses in 2017 compared to net impairment charges in 2016, added to the decrease. The decrease was partially offset by a lower capitalisation rate on exploration expenditures incurred in 2017 compared to 2016.

In 2016, exploration expenses were down 24% compared to 2015 mainly due to the USD/NOK exchange rate development and increasedlower net impairment of exploration prospects and signature bonuses, in 2015. A lower level of drilling activity and less expensive wells being drilled. The decrease was partially offset by a higher capitalisation rateportion of expenditures capitalised in previous years being expensed in 2016 and a lower portioncapitalisation rate on exploration expenditures incurred in 2016 compared to 2015.

Net operating income was USD 13,771 million in 2017 compared to USD 80 million in 2016 and USD 1,366 million in 2015.

With reference to the development in revenues and costs as discussed above, the significant increase in 2017 was primarily driven by higher prices for both liquids and gas, increased gas volumes, significant net impairments reversals in 2017 compared to net impairment charges in 2016 and the reversal of previously capitalised expenditures being expensedprovisions related to our operations in Angola. Reduced depreciation and exploration expenses added to the increase. The decrease in 2016 compared to 2015 was mainly driven by the drop in liquids and gas prices, lower refinery margins and lower gains on sale of assets. Lower net impairment charges in 2016 compared to 2015 and a reduction in operating, depreciation and exploration costs partially offset the increase.

The increase in exploration expenses in 2014 compared to 2013 was mainly due to increased impairments of exploration prospects and signature bonuses internationally. Also, the cancellation of a rig contract in 2014 impacted exploration expenses negatively in 2014 compared to 2013.

As a result of the factors explained above, net operating income was NOK 14.9 billion in 2015, compared to NOK 109.5 billion in 2014. In 2013, net operating income was NOK 155.5 billion.decrease.

 

Net financial items amounted to a loss of USD 351 million in 2017. In 2016 and 2015, net financial items were negative NOK 10.6 billionalso a loss of USD 258 million and USD 1,311 million, respectively.

The increased loss of USD 93 million in 2015, compared to NOK 0.0 billion in 2014 and negative NOK 17.0 billion in 2013. The decrease in 20152017 was mainly due to loss on derivatives due to increase in EUR and USD interest rates related to loss of NOK 3.8 billion on derivatives related to the long termour long-term debt portfolio in 2015,of USD 61 million for 2017, compared to a gain of NOK 5.8 billionUSD 470 million for 2016, partially offset by a reversal of interest expense of USD 319 million in 2014,2017 previously provided for related to a resolved dispute regarding Statoil’s participation offshore Angola in the period 2002 to 2016. For further information, see note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets to the Consolidated financial statements.

The reduced loss of USD 1,053 million in 2016 was mainly due to changes in the interest yield curves.

In 2014, net financial items improved from negative NOK 17.0 billion in 2013 to NOK 0.0 billion mainlygain on derivatives due to a positive changedecrease in currency derivatives used for currencyEUR and liquidity risk management as a result of changes in underlying currency positions and strengtheningGBP interest rates related to our long-term debt portfolio of USD towards NOK of 22.2% in 2014470 million for 2016, compared to a strengtheningloss of USD towards NOK of 9.3% in 2013. The improvement in 2014 also reflected a positive change on interest rate swap positions related to interest rate management of non-current bonds mainly due to decreased long term USD interest rates by an average of 0.6%-points in 2014 compared to an increase in 2013 by an average of 1.0%-points. These positive changes were partially offset by increased interest and other finance expenses in 2014.491 million for 2015.

 

Income taxes were NOK 41.6 billionUSD 8,822 million in 2015,2017, equivalent to an effective tax rate of 65.7%, compared to USD 2,724 million in 2016, equivalent to an effective tax rate of more than 100%.In 2015, income taxes were USD 5,225million, compared to NOK 87.4 billion, equivalent to an effective tax rate of 79.9% in 2014. In 2013, income taxes were NOK 99.2 billion, equivalent to an effective tax rate of 71.7%more than 100%.

 

The effective tax rate in 2017 was primarily influenced by the agreement with the Angolan Ministry of Finance related to Statoil’s participation in several blocks offshore Angola. For further information, see note 9 Income taxes to the Consolidated financial statements.

In 2016 and 2015, aggregated accounting lossesincome before tax was a loss of USD 178 million in 2016 and a profit of USD 55 million in 2015, which both were recogniseda combination of large profits in countriesterritories with higher than averagestatutory tax rates hence(taking account of Norwegian Petroleum Tax including uplift) and approximately the same amount of losses in territories with lower statutory tax rates. Hence, our effective tax rate is distorted. In addition, the “weighted average statutory tax rate”, calculate before taking into account the Norwegian petroleum tax including uplift for comparability, was negative. also distorted.

In 2016, the effective rate of tax on profit earned by E&P Norway, approximated the statutory tax rate (taking account of Norwegian Petroleum Tax including uplift). However, the effective tax rate on E&P International losses was negative due to the inability to currently recognise tax losses and other deferred tax assets arising from losses, primarily in the USA. Overall, this results in a significant income tax charge on a relatively small group loss before tax.

The effective tax ratein 2015 was primarily influenced by losses, mainly caused by impairments recognised in countries where deferred tax assets could not be recognised, (NOK 23.5 billion), partially offset by tax exempted gains on sale of assets including Statoil’s interest in the Shah Deniz project (NOK 3.7 billion) and the tax effect of foreign exchange losses in entities that are taxable in other currencies than the functional currency (NOK 5.8 billion). These losses are tax deductible, but do not impact the Consolidated statement of income. Furthermore, theproject. The effective tax rate in 2015 was also influenced by the de-recognition of deferred tax assets within the Development and ProductionE&P International segment due to uncertainty related to future taxable income (NOK 4.7 billion), as described in Note 9 Income taxesto the Consolidated financial statements.income.

 

The effective tax rate in 2014 was primarily influenced by losses, mainly caused by impairments, recognised in countries where deferred tax assets could not be recognised (NOK 12.1 billion), partially offset by tax exempted gains on sale of assets including Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) and Statoil’s interest in the Shah Deniz project (NOK 6.2 billion) and the tax effect of foreign exchange losses in entities that are taxable in other currencies than the functional currency (NOK 5.1 billion). These losses are tax deductible, but do not impact the Consolidated statement of income. The effective tax rate in 2014 was also influenced by the recognition of a non-cash tax income (NOK 2.0 billion) following a verdict in the Norwegian Supreme Court in February 2014. The Supreme Court voted in favour of Statoil in a tax dispute regarding the tax treatment of foreign exploration expenditures.

The effective tax rate is calculated as income taxes divided by income before taxes. Fluctuations in the effective tax rates from year to year are principally the result of non-taxable items (permanent differences) and changes in the relative composition of income between Norwegian oil and gas production, taxed at a marginal rate of 78%, and income from other tax jurisdictions. Other Norwegian

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201767


income, including the onshore portion of net financial items, is taxed at 24% (25% in 2016 and 27% (28% in 2013)2015), and income in other countries is taxed at the applicable income tax rates in thosethe various countries.

 

In 2015,2017, net incomewas negative NOK 37.3 billionUSD 4,598 million compared to positive NOK 22.0 billionnegative USD 2,902 million in 20142016 and NOK 39.2 billionnegative USD 5,169 million in 2013.2015.

 

The significant decrease from 2014 to 2015increase in 2017 was mainly due toa result of the dropincrease in prices, leading to lower earningsnet operating income, partially offset by the increase income taxes and impairment losses. Increased losseshigher loss on net financial items, relatedas explained above. The increase from 2015 to derivatives added to the decrease, which was partially offset by the reduction in income taxes.

The 44% decrease in net income from 2013 to 20142016 was mainly due to lower prices, resulting in reduced earningsincome taxes and impairment losses. Increased exploration expenditures added tolower loss on net financial items, partially offset by the decrease whilst lower income taxes partially offset the decrease.in net operating income.

 

The board of directors proposes ato the annual general meeting (AGM) to increase the dividend ofby 4.5% to USD 0.22010.23 per ordinary share for the fourth quarter 2015 and the introduction of a2017. The two-year scrip dividend programme starting from the fourth quarter 2015, subject to approval at the annual general meeting in lineended as planned with the authorisation from May 2015. The scrip programme will give shareholders the option to receive quarterly dividends in cash or in newly issued shares in Statoil, at a 5% discount for the fourththird quarter 2015. The Norwegian Government, as majority shareholder, supports the proposal and will seek the Norwegian Parliament’s approval to vote in favour of the proposal at the annual general meeting. The Norwegian government will match subscription of shares by minority shareholders, and thereby maintain its ownership share at 67% throughout the programme. See section 6.1 Dividend policy for more information.2017-dividend.

 

The Annual ordinary dividends for 20152017 amounted to an aggregate total of NOK 23.5 billion. AnnualUSD 1,586 million, net after scrip dividend of USD 1,357 million. Considering the proposed dividend, USD 2,371 million will be allocated to retained earnings in the parent company.

For 2016 and 2015, annual ordinary dividends amounted to an aggregate total of NOK 22.9 billion USD 1,934 million, net after scrip dividend of USD 904 million and NOK 22.3 billion in 2014 and 2013,USD 2,860 million, respectively.

76Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


In 2014, following a regular review process of Statoil’s 2012 Consolidated financial statements, the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway (the FSA), concluded that it had identified three errors related to interpretation and application of IFRS accounting principles for determination of cash generating units (CGUs) and impairment evaluations. For two of the matters, Statoil accepted the FSA’s interpretations and has applied such interpretations in preparing the Consolidated financial statements. Statoil did not restate prior period financial statements as the impact was immaterial. For the third matter, Statoil does not accept the FSA’s conclusion. In accordance with due process for such matters under Norwegian regulation, Statoil has appealed the order to the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, and has been granted a stay in carrying out the FSA’s order pending the final outcome of the appeal. See note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assetsto the Consolidated financial statements for further details.

 

With effect from first quarter of 2016, Statoil will change to USD as presentation currency. The change reflects the company`s underlying exposure to the USD as well as better alignment of its reporting to peers.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201577


4.1.3 Segment performanceFor further information, see note 17 Shareholders’ equity and analysis

Internal transactions in oil and gas volumes occur between our reporting segments before being sold in the market. The pricing policy for internal transfers is based on estimated market prices.

We eliminate intercompany sales when combining the results of reporting segments. Intercompany sales include transactions recorded in connection with our oil and natural gas production in DPN or DPI and also in connection with the sale, transportation or refining of our oil and natural gas production in MMP.

DPN produces oil and natural gas which is sold internally to MMP. A large share of the oil produced by DPI is also sold from MMP. The remaining oil and gas from DPI is sold directly in the market. For intercompany sales and purchases, Statoil has established a market-based transfer pricing methodology for the oil and natural gas that meets the requirements as to applicable laws and regulations.

Effective from the fourth quarter of 2013, revenues generated by the upstream segment in the United States are reported net of royalty interest. This change does not result in a change in net operating income. Historical information has been aligned to the current presentation, reflected in the following tables.

In 2015, the average transfer price for natural gas was NOK 1.58 per scm. The average transfer price was NOK 1.57 per scm in 2014 and NOK 1.92 in

2013. For oil sold from DPN to MMP, the transfer price is the applicable market-reflective price minus a cost recovery rate.

The following table shows certain financial information for the four reporting segments, including intercompany eliminations for each of the years in the three-year period ending 31 December 2015. For additional information please refer to note 3 Segments dividends to the Consolidated financial statements.

 

 

  For the year ended 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

Development & Production Norway

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

139.5

182.2

202.2

Net operating income

57.6

111.7

137.1

Non-current segment assets1)

244.1

262.0

247.6

 

 

 

 

 

Development & Production International

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

68.4

85.2

81.9

Net operating income

(66.9)

(19.5)

16.4

Non-current segment assets1)

330.1

333.8

286.5

 

 

 

 

 

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

467.4

597.3

608.6

Net operating income

23.7

16.2

2.6

Non-current segment assets1)

49.2

46.3

39.3

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

3.2

0.3

1.0

Net operating income

(0.8)

(1.5)

(1.1)

Non-current segment assets1)

6.1

5.1

5.6

 

 

 

 

 

Eliminations2)

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

(195.7)

(242.3)

(259.1)

Net operating income

1.2

2.6

0.4

Non-current segment assets1)

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil group

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

482.8

622.7

634.5

Net operating income

14.9

109.5

155.5

Non-current segment assets1)

629.5

647.3

578.9

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Deferred tax assets, pension assets, equity accounted investments and non-current financial instruments are not allocated to segments.

2)

Includes elimination of inter-segment sales and related unrealised profits, mainly from the sale of crude oil and products.

Inter-segment revenues are based upon estimated market prices.

78Statoil, Annual ReportIn accordance with §3-3a of the Norwegian Accounting Act, the board of directors confirms that the going concern assumption on Form 20-F 2015


Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201579


The following tables show total revenues by geographic area.which the financial statements have been prepared, is appropriate.

 

2015 Total revenues and other income by geographic area

Crude oil

Gas

NGL

Refined

products

Other

Total sales

(in NOK billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

182.4

86.9

39.8

45.4

15.7

370.1

US

29.9

9.1

4.3

12.8

7.7

63.8

Sweden

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.2

1.0

15.2

Denmark

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.1

0.1

14.1

Other

10.8

3.6

0.1

0.0

5.4

19.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (excluding net income (loss)

from equity accounted investments) and other income

223.1

99.6

44.2

86.5

29.8

483.1



2014 Total revenues and other income by geographic area

Crude oil

Gas

NGL

Refined

products

Other

Total sales

(in NOK billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

256.2

81.0

55.0

54.4

18.7

465.3

US

49.9

13.8

4.0

14.8

8.6

91.2

Sweden

0.0

0.0

0.0

16.5

1.7

18.2

Denmark

0.0

0.0

0.0

19.1

0.2

19.3

Other

18.6

4.4

0.4

0.0

5.4

28.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (excluding net income (loss)

from equity accounted investments and other income

324.6

99.3

59.5

104.8

34.7

622.9



2013 Total revenues and other income by geographic area

Crude oil

Gas

NGL

Refined

products

Other

Total sales

(in NOK billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

238.0

92.7

61.7

69.5

14.0

475.9

US

62.9

13.5

2.5

10.9

4.7

94.5

Sweden

0.0

0.0

0.0

17.2

(0.1)

17.1

Denmark

0.0

0.0

0.0

21.3

0.1

21.4

Other

20.6

4.2

0.3

0.0

0.4

25.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (excluding net income (loss)

from equity accounted investments and other income

321.5

110.4

64.5

118.9

19.1

634.4

80SEGMENTS FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEStatoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

4.1.4 DPNE&P Norway profit and loss analysis

DPN netNet operating income in 2017 was NOK 57.6 billion, down 48%USD 10,485 million, compared to 2014USD 4,451 million in 2016 and USD 7,161 million in 2015. The USD 6,034 million increase from 2016 to 2017 was mainly driven by the drop in liquids prices and increased net impairment charges. Production ofdue to higher liquids and gas prices, and net impairment reversals of USD 905 million in 2017 compared to impairment of USD 829 million in 2016. The USD 2,710 million decrease from 2015 to 2016 was up 3.9%.mainly due to lower prices on liquids and gas, partially offset by reduced operating expenses, decreased depreciation and net impairment losses.

 

The average daily production of liquids and gas (see section 9 Terms and definitions) was 1,2321,334 mboe, 1,1831,235 mboe and 1,2171,232 mboe per day in 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively.

The average daily total production level was increased from 2016 to 2017 mainly due to higher flex gas off-take from Troll and 2013, respectively.Oseberg, contributions from new fields Ivar Aasen and Gina Krog, and fewer turnarounds.

 

The average daily total production of liquids and gas increased by 4%maintained from 20142015 to 2015,2016, mainly due to ramp up ofhigh operational performance, new fields increased gas saleson stream and good operational performance, partly offset by expected natural decline and divestments.new wells from existing fields.

 

The average daily production of liquids and gas decreased by 3% from 2013 to 2014. This decrease was mainly due to expected natural decline and divestments, partially offset by new fields in production and higher production regularity in 2014 compared to 2013.

Over time, the volumes lifted and sold will equal entitlement production, but may be higher or lower in any period due to differences between the capacities and timing of the vessels lifting the volumes and the actual entitlement production during the period. See section 9 Terms and definitions for more information.

 

Income statement under IFRS

For the year ended 31 December

 

For the year ended 31 December

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

17-16 change

16-15 change

 

 

 

 

Revenues

138.1

175.3

188.9

(21%)

(7%)

17,558

13,036

17,170

35%

(24%)

Net income from equity accounted investments

0.0

0.1

(62%)

18%

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

129

(78)

3

N/A

Other income

1.4

6.8

13.2

(79%)

(48%)

5

119

166

(96%)

(28%)

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

139.5

182.2

202.2

(23%)

(10%)

17,692

13,077

17,339

35%

(25%)

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses

(25.8)

(25.2)

(27.4)

3%

(8%)

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses

(2,954)

(2,547)

(3,223)

16%

(21%)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(51.4)

(40.0)

(32.2)

29%

24%

(3,874)

(5,698)

(6,379)

(32%)

(11%)

Exploration expenses

(4.6)

(5.4)

(5.5)

(14%)

(2%)

(379)

(383)

(576)

(1%)

(34%)

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

57.6

111.7

137.1

(48%)

(19%)

Net operating income/(loss)

10,485

4,451

7,161

>100%

(38%)

 

 


 

Total revenues and other income were NOK 139.5 billionUSD 17,692 million in 2015, NOK 182.2 billion2017, USD 13,077 million in 20142016 and NOK 202.2 billionUSD 17,339 million in 2013.2015.

 

The 21%35% increase in revenues from 2016 to 2017 was mainly due to increased liquids and gas prices, and increased gas volumes. The 25% decrease in revenues from 20142015 to 20152016 was mainly due to reduced liquids prices. This was partly offset by a positive exchange rate development (NOK/USD), increased lifted volumes and increased gas prices. In addition, in 2015 a re-assessed valuation estimate of earn-out derivatives resulted in an unrealised fair value loss on derivatives and impacted revenues negatively.

 

The 7% decreaseOther income was immaterial in revenues 2017. Other income in 2016 was impacted by gain from 2013 to 2014 was mainly due to reduced gas and liquids prices and reduced lifted volumessale of both liquids and gas, mainly caused by divestments and expected natural decline. This was partly offset by a positive exchange rate development (NOK/USD). In 2013, a re-assessed valuation estimateEdvard Grieg of earn-out derivatives resulted in an unrealised fair value loss on derivatives and impacted revenues negatively.

USD 114 million. Other income in 2015 was impacted by gains from the sale of certain ownership interest on the NCS to Repsol of NOK 1.2 billion. Other income in 2014 was impacted by gainsgain from the sale of certain ownership interests on the NCS to WintershallRepsol of NOK 5.9 billion. Other income in 2013 was impacted by gains from sale of certain ownership interests on the NCS to OMV and Wintershall (NOK 13.0 billion).USD 142 million.

 

As a result of the factors explained above, total revenues and other income decreased by 23% and 10% in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses were NOK 25.8 billionUSD 2,954 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 25.2 billionUSD 2,547 million in 20142016 and NOK 27.4 billionUSD 3,223 million in 2013.2015. In 2015,2017, expenses increased compared to 20142016 mainly due to gain relatedchange in the internal allocation of gas transportation costs between E&P Norway and MMP. The change in internal allocation also increased the revenues due to changes in pension scheme in 2014 and ramp up of new field during 2015. This was partly offset by cost improvements and reduced turnaround activity level on several fields.a higher transfer price. In 20142016, expenses decreased compared to 20132015 mainly due to a gain related to changes in pension schemecost improvements and reduced operating costs at several fields due to divestments. This was partly offset by increased environmental tax expenses, operating preparations for new fields coming on stream and new fields commencing production during 2014.exchange rate development (NOK/USD).

 

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses were NOK 51.4 billionUSD 3,874 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 40.0 billionUSD 5,698 million in 20142016 and NOK 32.2 billionUSD 6,379 million in 2013.2015. The increasedecrease of 29%32% from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly due to areversal of impairments in 2017 and impairments in 2016. The decrease of 11% from 2015 to 2016 was mainly due to reduced net impairment loss of NOK 8.6 billion in 2015 (primarily resulting from the reduced oil price forecast), new fields commencing productionimpairments, exchange rate development (NOK/USD) and ramp-upincreased proved reserves, partially offset by ramp up of new fields in 2015.The increase from 2013 to 2014

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201581


was mainly due to increased investments, new fields commencing production, increased asset retirement obligation with a corresponding higher basis for depreciations and an impairment loss. These effects were partly offset by reduced depreciation due to portfolio changes.2016.

 

Exploration expenseswere NOK 4.6 billionUSD 379 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 5.4 billionUSD 383 million in 20142016 and NOK 5.5 billionUSD 576 million in 2013.2015. The reduction from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly due to lower drillingfield development activity aand lower portion of previously capitalised exploration expenditures being expensed in 2015, and idle rig costs in 2014.2017, partially offset by a lower portion of current exploration expenditures being capitalised. The reduction from 20132015 to 20142016 was mainly due to lower drilling activity and less field development work due to sanctioning of Johan Sverdrup,more expensive wells being drilled in 2015, partially offset by a higherlower portion of current exploration expenditures capitalised in previous periods being expensed in 2014.

Net operating income in 2015 was NOK 57.6 billion, compared to NOK 111.7 billion in 2014 and NOK 137.1 billion in 2013. The NOK 54.0 billion decrease from 2014 to 2015 was mainly due to lower prices on liquids and increased depreciation and net impairment losses. The NOK 25.4 billion decrease from 2013 to 2014 was mainly due to lower prices on liquids and gas and increased depreciation and net impairment losses.capitalised.

 

4.1.5 DPIE&P International profit and loss analysis

Net operating income

DPI results in 2017 was positive USD 1,341 million, compared to negative USD 4,352 million in 2016 and negative USD 8,729 million in 2015. The positive development from 2016 to 2017 was caused primarily by higher oil and gas prices, and by net reversal of impairments in 2017 compared to net impairment losses in 2016. The positive development from 2015 were heavily impactedto 2016 was caused primarily by less impairment losses, and also by lower prices and impairment losses. DPI delivered 6% growth in entitlement production, averaging 580 mboe per day.operating expenses.

 

The average daily equity liquids and gas production (see section 95.6 Terms and definitionsabbreviations)  was 745 mboe per day in 2017, compared to 743 mboe per day in 2016 and 739 mboe per day in 2015, compared2015. The minor increase from 2016 to 744 mboe2017 was due to new wells in 2014 and 723 mboe in 2013. The decrease of 0.7% from 2014 to 2015 was driven primarily bythe US, particularly at Appalachian, as well as the effect of ramp-up of fields, mainly in Ireland and Algeria. The increase was partially offset by the divestment of Shah Deniz (Azerbaijan) and a portion of Marcellus (US), Kai Kos Dehseh oil sandsand natural decline, primarily at mature fields in Angola. The decreaseincrease of 0.5% from 2015 to 2016 was partly offsetdriven primarily by the effect of the ramp-up of fields, mainly CLOV (Angola)in Ireland, Algeria, and Jack/St. Malo (US).

The increase of 3% from 2013 to 2014 was driven primarily by the ramp-up of fields, including Marcellus (US), CLOV and PSVM (Angola).US. The increase was partlypartially offset by natural decline, primarily at mature fields in Angola, and the effect of the farm-downdivestment of Shah Deniz (Azerbaijan) and natural decline. 

 

The average daily entitlement production of liquids and gas (seeproduction (see section 95.6 Terms and definitionsabbreviations)  was 588 mboe per day in 2017, compared to 592 mboe per day in 2016, and 580 mboe per day in 2015, compared to 546 mboe per day in 2014 and 502 mboe per day in 2013.2015. Entitlement production in 20152017 was updown by 6%1% due to the benefit of lowerhigher negative effect from production sharing agreements (PSA effect), and US royalties, mainly driven by the decreasehigher prices. Entitlement production in prices. The increase from 20132016 was up by 2% due to 2014 was driven bythe increased equity production as described above and a relatively lower PSA effect. The PSAcombined effect of production sharing agreements (PSA effect) and US royalties was 116158 mboe, 157151 mboe and 182159 mboe per day in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

 

Over time, the volumes lifted and sold will equal our entitlement production, but they may be higher or lower in any period due to differences between the capacity and timing of the vessels lifting our volumes and the actual entitlement production during the period. See section 95.6 Terms and definitionsabbreviations for more information.

 

Income statement under IFRS

For the year ended 31 December

 

For the year ended 31 December

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

17-16 change

16-15 change

 

 

Revenues

57.0

80.2

78.1

(29%)

3%

9,219

6,623

7,135

39%

(7%)

Net income from equity accounted investments

(0.8)

(0.0)

1%

>100%

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

22

(100)

(91)

N/A

(10%)

Other income

12.2

5.8

3.9

>100%

50%

14

134

1,156

(90%)

(88%)

 

 

Total revenues and other income

68.4

85.2

81.9

(20%)

4%

9,256

6,657

8,200

39%

(19%)

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory]

(0.1)

(0.0)

(0.1)

>100%

(85%)

(7)

(10)

2%

(28%)

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses

(27.3)

(22.9)

(21.0)

19%

9%

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses

(2,804)

(2,923)

(3,391)

(4%)

(14%)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(81.6)

(56.8)

(31.9)

44%

78%

(4,423)

(5,510)

(10,231)

(20%)

(46%)

Exploration expenses

(26.3)

(25.0)

(12.5)

6%

100%

(681)

(2,569)

(3,296)

(74%)

(22%)

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

(66.9)

(19.5)

16.4

>100%

>(100%)

Net operating income/(loss)

1,341

(4,352)

(8,729)

N/A

50%

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201769


 

DPIE&P International generated total revenues and other income of NOK 68.4 billionUSD 9,256 million in 20152017, compared to NOK 85.2 billionUSD 6,657 million in 20142016 and NOK 81.9 billionUSD 8,200 million in 2013.2015.

 

Revenues in 2017 were positively impacted primarily by higher realised liquids and gas prices, in addition to positive effects from reversal of provisions related to our operations in Angola of USD 754 million. The decrease from 2015 were negatively impactedto 2016 was mainly caused by lower realised liquids and gas prices, partlypartially offset by a positive currency effect from the NOK/USD development and an increase in lifted volumes. In addition, higher provisions relating to commercial disputes in 2015 compared to 2014 added to the decrease in total revenues. The increase from 2013 to 2014 was mainly caused by an increase in lifted volumes. In addition, lower provisions relating to commercial disputes in 20142016 compared to 2013 positively impacted revenues. The increase was partly offset by lower realised liquids2015.For information related to the reversal of provisions and gas prices, partly offset by a positive currency effect fromdisputes, see note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets to the NOK/USD development.Consolidated financial statements.

 

82Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Other income was USD 14 million in 2017, compared to USD 134 million in 2016 and USD 1,156 million in 2015. In 2017, other income was mainly related to proceeds from minor insurance claims. In 2016, other income was mainly related to proceeds from an insurance settlement. In 2015, was positively impacted byother income consisted of gains from sales of assets, of NOK 12.2 billion in 2015 and NOK 5.8 billion in 2014, related primarily to the sale of ownership interest in the Shah Deniz project and the South Caucasus Pipeline. Other income in 2014 was also positively impacted by increased gains from sales of assets of NOK 2.3 billion. 

 

As a result of the factors explained above, total revenues and other income decreasedincreased by 20%39% in 2015.2017. In 2014,2016, total revenues and other income increaseddecreased by 4%19%.

 

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses  were NOK 27.3 billionUSD 2,804 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 22.9 billionUSD 2,923 million in 20142016 and NOK 21.0 billionUSD 3,391 million in 2013.2015. The 19% increase4% decrease from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly due to the currency effectportfolio changes and reduced provisions related to asset retirement. The decreases were partially offset by net losses from the NOK/USD development. Production ramp-up on CLOVsale of assets in Angola2017, and start-up of thehigher royalties, costs related to preparation for operation for new fields Jack/St Malo in the US in 2014 addedand transportation expenses. The 14% decrease from 2015 to the increase. Reduced operations and maintenance costs, lower royalties caused by lower prices and portfolio changes partially offset the increase. Excluding the USD/NOK exchange rate development, operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by 6%. The 9% increase from 2013 to 20142016 was mainly due to higherlower operating and maintenance costs for various fields, in addition to lower diluent expenses. The decreases were partially offset by operating and transportation expenses caused by production growth, primarily in North America. In addition, operating expenses increased due tocosts for the start-up of CLOV in 2014.new fields coming on stream.

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses  were NOK 81.6 billionUSD 4,423 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 56.8 billionUSD 5,510 million in 20142016 and NOK 31.9 billionUSD 10,231 million in 2013.2015. The 44% increase20% decrease from 20142016 to 2017 was caused primarily by net reversal of impairments in 2017, compared to net impairment losses in 2016. Net reversal of impairments amounted to USD 102 million in 2017, with the reversal of impairment related to an unconventional onshore asset in North America, caused by changes in US tax legislation, operational improvements and increased recovery rate, as the main contributor. In addition, depreciations decreased due to higher reserves estimates and effects from previous periods’ impairments, partially offset by production ramp-up from new fields.

The 46% decrease from 2015 to 2016 was primarily caused by lower net impairment losses of NOK 42.7 billionin 2016 compared to 2015. Net impairment losses amounted to USD 541 million in 2016 and resulted mainly from reduced long-term price assumptions with the largest effect being on the unconventional onshore assets in North America. Net impairment losses amounted to USD 5,416 million in 2015, and were mainly related to unconventional onshore assets in North America and certain conventional upstream assets within the DPI reporting segment.assets. The impairment losses resulted primarily from reduced short-term forward prices in combination with reduced long-term oil price forecasts. In addition, depreciation increaseddepreciations decreased due to the NOK/USD development and higher production fromreserves estimates. The decreases were partially offset by start-up and ramp-up on various fields (CLOV, Jack/St Malo).of production from new fields.

Exploration expenses were USD681 million in 2017, compared to USD 2,569 million in 2016 and USD 3,296 million in 2015. The increases were partly offset by effectreduction from net impairments in 2014 and 2015 and reduced depreciation from higher reserves estimates.

The 78% increase from 20132016 to 20142017 was mainly due to net impairment losses of NOK 23.8 billionexploration prospects and signature bonuses in 2014, mainly related2016 of USD 992 million compared with USD 82 million in 2017. Lower portion of capitalised expenditures from earlier years being expensed in 2017 of USD 60 million compared with USD 785 million in 2016 contributed to the Kai Kos Dehseh oil sands projectreduction, in Canada, unconventional onshore assetsaddition to less expensive wells drilled in North America and certain conventional upstream assets within the DPI reporting segment. The impairment losses were primarily resulting from reduced short-term oil price forecast. In addition, depreciation increased due to start-up and ramp-up of production from various fields (CLOV, PSVM, Eagle Ford and Bakken). The increases were partly2017 despite higher exploration activity. This was partially offset by reduced depreciationlower capitalization rate in 2017. The 22% reduction from increased reserves and divestment of assets.


Exploration expenses
wereNOK 26.3 billion in 2015 compared to NOK 25.0 billion in 2014 and NOK 12.5 billion in 2013. The increase from 2014 to 20152016 was mainly due to increasedlower impairments, of oillower drilling activity and gas prospectslower well costs in the Gulf of Mexico, partly offset by a higher2016. Higher portion of exploration expenditure beingwells capitalised in 2015. previous periods being expensed this year and a lower capitalisation rate in 2016 partially offset the decrease.

 

Exploration expenses increased by NOK 12.5 billion from 2013 to 2014, primarily due to increased impairments of oil

MMP profit and gas prospects and signature bonuses and write-offs of exploration expenditures, mainly in Angola and the Gulf of Mexico. Also, the cancellation of a rig contract in 2014 impacted exploration expenses negatively in 2014.

loss analysis

Net operating income was USD 2,243 million, USD 623 million and USD 2,931 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In 2017 net operating income was negative NOK 66.9 billion,positively impacted by changes in fair value of derivatives and periodisation of inventory hedging effect of USD 365 million compared to negative NOK 19.5 billionimpact of USD 1,072 million in 20142016. Higher refinery margins and positive NOK 16.4 billion in 2013. The negative developmentincreased production from 2014processing plants added to 2015 was caused primarily by lower realised liquids and gas prices and impairment losses, and also by higher depreciations and higher operating expenses. The decreasethe total increase of USD 1,620 million from 20132016 to 2014 was caused primarily by impairment losses, and also by lower realised liquids and gas prices, higher depreciations and higher operating expenses.2017.

702Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    83


 

4.1.6 MMP profit

The decrease of USD 2,308 million from 2015 to 2016 was mainly due to lower fair value of derivatives and loss analysis

periodisation of inventory hedging effect of USD 1,072 million in 2016 compared to negative USD 21 million in 2015. Lower margins from processing and turnarounds in 2016 added to the decrease. The 2015 results for MMP have been influenceddecrease is also impacted by improved refining margins, solid liquids trading results andthe net reversal of impairment losses from previous periods. The results were negatively impacted by lower margins for the European gas sales.charges of USD 421 million in 2015.

 

Total natural gas sales volumes were 58.4 bcm in 2017, 52.9 bcm in 2016 and 52.6 bcm in 2015 (1.86 tcf), 51.2 bcm in 2014 (1.80 tcf) and 56.6 bcm (2.00 tcf) in 2013.2015. The 3%10% increase in total gas volumes sold from 20142016 to 20152017 was related to higher entitlement production on the NCS in addition to higher third party volumes in Europe,and internationally, partially offset by lower entitlement production internationally and lowersales of third party volumes in the US.gas. The 9% decrease in gas volumes sold from 2013 to 2014 was mainly related to lower third party volumes primarily in the US, and lower entitlement production on the NCS.

Third party natural gas sales volumes, as presented in the chart dodoes not include any volumes sold on behalf of the Norwegian State's direct financial interest (SDFI). MMP sold 37.2, 33.4 bcm and 35.0 bcm of NCS gas on behalf of SDFI in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.


 

In 2015,2017, the average invoiced natural gas sales price in Europe was NOK 2.16USD 5.55 per scm compared to NOK 2.28mmBtu, up 7% from 2016 (USD 5.17 per scm in 2014, a decrease of 5% mainly due to higher share of gas indexation in the gas contract portfolio and effect from drop in oil product prices on oil indexed contracts. LNG has a positive contribution on the European Gas price but less in 2015 as the LNG prices decreased by 23% from 2014 to 2015.mmBtu). The 2016 average invoiced natural gas sales price in Europe was approximately 7% lower in 2014 than in 2013, mainly due to general decrease in gas market prices partially offset by improved price premium vs. gas market prices in our gas contract portfolio. down 27% from 2015 (USD 7.08 per mmBtu).

In 2015,2017, the average invoiced natural gas sales price in North Americas was NOK 0.80USD 2.73 per scm compared to NOK 1.04mmBtu, up 28% from 2016 (USD 2.12 per scm in 2014, a decrease of 23% mainly due to a generally weaker gas market partially offset by USD/NOK exchange rate development.mmBtu). The 2016 average invoiced natural gas sales price in North Americas was approximately 25% higher in 2014 than in 2013, mainly due to high market prices in first quarter 2014 as a result of exceptionally cold weather in North East combined with long term pipeline capacity agreements enabling access to premium markets in Toronto and Manhattan.down 19% from 2015 (USD 2.62 per mmBtu).

 

All of Statoil's gas produced on the NCS is sold by MMP, purchased from DPNE&P Norway at the fields’ lifting point at a market-based internal price reduced bywith deduction for the cost of bringing gas from the field to market and a cost covermarketing fee element. Our average internal purchaseNCS transfer price for gas was NOK 1.58USD 4.33 per scmmmBtu in 2017, an increase of 27% compared to USD 3.42 per mmBtu in 2016.The 2016 NCS transfer price was down 34% from 2015 up 1% from NOK 1.57(USD 5.17 per scm in 2014. Reduction in the market-based prices is offset by decreased cost element from 2014 to 2015.

 mmBtu).

 

Average crude, condensate and NGL sales were 2.32.2 mmbbl per day in 20152017 of which approximately 1.071.01 mmbbl were sales of our equity volumes, 0.790.83 mmbbl sales of third-party volumes and 0.410.40 mmbbl sales of volumes purchased from SDFI. Our average sales volume wasvolumes were 2.2 and 2.3 mmbbl per day in 20142016 and 2013.2015. The average daily third-party volumes sold were 0.830.80 and 0.79 mmbbl in 20142016 and 2013.2015

 

MMP’s


Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201771


MMPs refining margin remained at a high level throughout 2015 reflecting lower crude oil pricesmargins were higher in 2017 than in 2016, and a strong demand for gasoline both in the US and China, while demand in Europe stopped falling. The outlook is that margins will continue to depend on gasoline markets with anticipated further growth in demand in Asia and with limited global capacity additions. Increasing global diesel demand, however, is offsetresults were also impacted by even higher production capacity.from the refineries. Statoil's refining reference margin was 6.3 USD/bbl in 2017, compared to 4.8 USD/bbl in 2016, an increase of 31%. The refining reference margin was 8.0 USD/bbl in 2015, compared to 4.7 USD/bbl in 2014, an increase of 70%. The refining reference margin was 4.1 USD/bbl in 2013.2015.

84Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Income statement under IFRS

For the year ended 31 December

 

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

 

 

(restated)

(restated)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

465.3

593.0

607.7

(22%)

(2%)

Net income from equity accounted investments

0.4

0.5

0.1

(6%)

>100%

Other income

1.7

3.8

0.7

(55%)

>100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

467.4

597.3

608.6

(22%)

(2%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory]

(406.5)

(544.2)

(565.2)

(25%)

(4%)

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses

(37.6)

(33.2)

(33.7)

13%

(2%)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

0.4

(3.6)

(7.0)

>(100%)

(48%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

23.7

16.2

2.6

47%

>100%

 

 

Income statement under IFRS

For the year ended 31 December

 

 

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

17-16 change

16-15 change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

59,017

44,847

57,873

32%

(23%)

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

53

61

55

(14%)

12%

Other income

1

72

178

(98%)

(60%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

59,071

44,979

58,106

31%

(23%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory]

(52,647)

(39,696)

(50,547)

33%

(21%)

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses

(3,925)

(4,439)

(4,664)

(12%)

(5%)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(256)

(221)

37

16%

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income/(loss)

2,243

623

2,931

>100%

(79%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income were NOK 467.4 billionUSD 59,071 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 597.3 billionUSD 44,979 million in 20142016 and NOK 608.6 billionUSD 58,106 million in 2013.2015.

The increase in revenues from 2016 to 2017 was mainly due to increase in prices for all products. The average crude price in USD increased by approximately 25% in 2017 compared to 2016.

 

The decrease in revenues from 20142015 to 20152016 was mainly due to decrease in crude and gas prices, partially offset by higher volumes for crude, other oil products and gas sold.prices. The average crude price in USD declined by approximately 47%17% in 20152016 compared to 2014, partially offset by weakening USD/NOK average daily exchange rate by approximately 28% in 2015. Revenues in 20152016 were positivelynegatively impacted by gainsloss from derivatives, mainly due to significant dropincrease in the forward curve in the oil and gas market.

 

The decrease in revenues from 2013 to 2014 was mainly due to decrease in gas and crude prices plus lower volumes of gas sold. The average crude price in USD declined by approximately 9% in 2014 compared to 2013, partially offset by weakening USD/NOK average daily exchange rate by approximately 7% in 2014. Revenues in 2014 were positively impacted by gains from derivatives, mainly due to significant drop in the forward curve in the oil market.

Other income in 20152017 was negligible. In 2016, other income was positively impacted by gain on sale of assets of NOK 1.7 billion. In 2014,USD 72 million, and in 2015 other income was positively impacted by the Sonatrach Arbitration Settlementgain on sale of NOK 2.8 billion, following an arbitration ruling in Statoil’s favour.assets of USD 178 million.

 

As a resultBecause of the factors explained above, total revenues and other income increased by 31% from 2016 to 2017 and decreased by 22% and 2% in23% from 2015 and 2014, respectively.to 2016.

 

722Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Purchases [net of inventory] were NOK 406.5 billionUSD 52,647 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 544.2 billionUSD 39,696 million in 20142016 and NOK 565.2 billionUSD 50,547 million in 2013.2015. The decreaseincrease from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly due to decreaseincrease in crude and gas prices and lower volumes of crude, other oil products and gas sold.price for all products. The decrease from 20132015 to 20142016 was mainly due to decrease in gas and crude prices, lower volumes of gas sold and losses on storages due to a significant price reduction.prices.

  

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses were NOK 37.6 billionUSD 3,925 million in 2015,2017, compared to NOK 33.2 billionUSD 4,439 million in 20142016 and NOK 33.7 billionUSD 4,664 million in 2013.2015. The increasedecrease from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly due to negative USD/NOK currency effectsa change in the internal allocation of gas transportation cost between MMP and onerous contract provisions of NOK 1.6 billion in 2015. This wasE&P Norway, partially offset by higher maintenance cost on plants. The decrease from 2015 to 2016 was mainly due to lower transportation cost and cost reduction due to improvement initiatives. Excluding the USD/NOK exchange rate development, operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses were at the same level as last year.

The Cove Point onerous contract provision of NOK 4.1 billion influenced expensesinitiatives in 2013. Excluding that item, 2014 figures would show an increase in expenses as compared to 2013. The increase was mainly caused by increased activity in the US in addition to negative NOK/USD currency effects.2016.

 

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses amounted to a loss of USD 256 million in 2017, and a loss of USD 221 million in 2016 compared to an income of NOK 0.4 billionUSD 37 million in 2015, compared to losses of NOK 3.6 billion in 2014 and NOK 7.0 billion in 2013.2015. The decreaseincrease in depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses from 20142016 to 2017 was mainly caused by lower reversal of impairments in 2017 compared to 2016. Net reversal of impairments in 2017 was mainly related to refinery assets, impacted by expected lower cost base in the future cash flows. The increase in depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses from 2015 to 2016 was mainly caused by net reversal of impairment charges of NOK 3.5 billion in 2015. The reversal of impairment was triggered by increased refinery margins and operational improvements. The decrease in depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses from 2013 to 2014 was mainly as a result of impairment losses of the refineries made in 2013.

Net operating income was NOK 23.7 billion, NOK 16.2 billion, NOK 2.6 billionUSD 421 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase of NOK 7.5 billion from 2014 to 2015 was mainly due to higher refining margins and solid liquids trading results in addition to negative USD/NOK foreign exchange rate development and net reversal of impairment charges of NOK 3.5 billion, These increases were partially offset by the Sonatrach Arbitration Settlement of NOK 2.8 billion in 2014 in Statoil’s favour, and lower margins for the European gas sales.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201585


The increase of NOK 13.6 billion from 2013 to 2014 was mainly due to lower impairment losses in 2014 compared to 2013, the Sonatrach Arbitration Settlement of NOK 2.8 billion in 2014 in Statoil’s favour, the onerous contract provision related to Cove Point of NOK 4.1 billion in 2013, and improved margins on gas in Europe including LNG arbitrage and stronger contribution from US gas sales due to an exceptionally cold winter in the North East US. Further, net operating income increased due to improved refining margins and increased result related to ownership in infrastructure. These increases were partially offset by losses on operational storages in 2014 due to reduced prices.our refineries.

 

4.1.7 Other operations

The Other reporting segment includes activities within New Energy Solutions; Global Strategy and& Business Development; Technology, Projects and& Drilling; and Corporate staffs and support functions.

 

In 2015,2017, the Other reporting segment recorded a net operating loss of NOK 0.8 billionUSD 239 million compared to a net operating loss of NOK 1.5 billionUSD 423 million in 20142016 and a net operating loss of NOK 1.1 billionUSD 129 million in 2013.2015.

86Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


4.2 Liquidity and capital resources

We believe that our established liquidity reserves, credit rating and access to capital markets provide us with sufficient working capital for our foreseeable requirements.

4.2.1 Review of cash flows

Statoil`s cash flows in 2015 reflect a high investment level, continued portfolio optimisation and issuance of new debt resulting in a small decrease in cash and cash equivalents and increase in short-term financial investments.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year

(in NOK billion)

Note

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

    

 4.3  

 109.4  

 138.4  

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

11, 12

 133.8  

 101.4  

 72.4  

Exploration expenditures written off

12

 17.1  

 13.7  

 3.1  

(Gains) losses on foreign currency transactions and balances

 

 (0.4) 

 (3.1) 

 4.8  

(Gains) losses from dispositions

4

 (17.3) 

 (12.4) 

 (17.6) 

(Increase) decrease in other items related to operating activities

 

 19.8  

 3.9  

 6.6  

(Increase) decrease in net derivative financial instruments

25

 9.2  

 (2.8) 

 11.7  

Interest received

 

 2.9  

 2.1  

 2.1  

Interest paid

 

 (3.6) 

 (3.4) 

 (2.5) 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities before taxes paid and working capital items

 

 165.8  

 208.8  

 218.8  

 

 

 

 

 

Taxes paid

 

 (65.7) 

 (96.6) 

 (114.2) 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in working capital

 

 8.9  

 14.2  

 (3.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

 

 109.0  

 126.5  

 101.3  

 

 

 

 

 

Additions through business combinations

4

 (3.5) 

 0.0  

 0.0  

Capital expenditures and investments

 

 (124.7) 

 (122.6) 

 (114.9) 

(Increase) decrease in financial investments

 

 (19.8) 

 (12.7) 

 (23.2) 

(Increase) decrease in other non-current items

 

 (0.3) 

 0.8  

 0.6  

Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses

4

 33.2  

 22.6  

 27.1  

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

 (115.1) 

 (112.0) 

 (110.4) 

 

 

 

 

 

New finance debt

18

 32.2  

 20.6  

 62.8  

Repayment of finance debt

 

 (11.4) 

 (9.7) 

 (7.3) 

Dividend paid

17

 (22.9) 

 (33.7) 

 (21.5) 

Net current finance debt and other

 

 (5.5) 

 (0.3) 

 (7.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 (7.5) 

 (23.1) 

 26.6  

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 (13.6) 

 (8.6) 

 17.5  

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 7.1  

 5.7  

 2.9  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period (net of overdraft)

16

 82.4  

 85.3  

 64.9  

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period (net of overdraft)

16

 75.9  

 82.4  

 85.3  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    8773


 

2.10 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Review of cash flows

Statoil`s cash flow generation in 2017 was strong across the business and total cash flows increased by USD 2,234 compared to 2016.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year

(in USD million)

 

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

 

14,363

9,034

13,628

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

(9,678)

(10,446)

(14,501)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(5,822)

(1,959)

(729)

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,137)

(3,371)

(1,602)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operationsoperating activities

The most significant drivers of cash flows provided by operations were the level of production and prices for liquids and natural gas that impact revenues, purchases [net of inventory], taxes paid and changes in working capital items.

 

CashIn 2017, cash flows provided by operating activitieswere NOK 109.0 billion in 2015increased by USD 5,329 million compared to NOK 126.5 billion2016. The increase was mainly due to increased liquids and gas prices, combined with higher production and a reduction in 2014, which is a decrease of NOK 17.5 billion. Cashworking capital, partially offset by increased tax payments.

In 2016, cash flows provided by operating activities before taxes paid and working capital items were reduced by NOK 43.0 billionUSD 4,594 million compared to 2014, driven by a significant reduction in both2015. The decrease was mainly due to reduced liquids and gas prices, measured in NOK. The decrease was partially offset by positive changes in working capital and lower taxes paid in 2015 compared to 2014.

Cash flows provided by operating activitieswere NOK 126.5 billion in 2014 compared to NOK 101.3 billion in 2013, an increase of NOK 25.2 billion. Cash flows provided by operating activities before taxes paid and working capital items were reduced by NOK 10.0 billion compared to 2013, driven by decreased profitability mainly caused by lower prices for liquids and European gas. The decrease was more than offset by positive changes in working capital and lower taxes paid in 2014 compared to 2013.paid.

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

In 2017, cCashash flows used in investing activitieswere NOK 115.1 billion in 2015reduced by USD 768 million compared to NOK 112.0 billion in 2014, an increase of NOK 3.1 billion mainly2016. The decrease was due to increaseddecreased capital expenditures, financial investments and additions through business combinations, partially offset by higherreduced proceeds from sale of assets and businesses.increased financial investments.

In 2016, cash flows used in investing were reduced by USD 4,055 million compared to 2015. The decrease was due to significantly lower capital expenditures, lower financial investments and reduced proceeds from sale of assets in 2015 of NOK 33.2 billion were mainly related to the divestment of the remaining interests in the Shah Deniz field and the South Caucasus pipeline, sale of office buildings, sale of interest in the Marcellus onshore play, sale of interests in Trans Adriatic pipeline AG and the sale of interests in licences on the NCS.

Cash flows used in investing activitieswere NOK 112.0 billion in 2014 compared to NOK 110.4 billion in 2013, an increase of NOK 1.6 billion mainly due to increased capital expenditures, partly offset by lower investments in deposits with more than three months maturity. The proceeds from sale of assets in 2014 of NOK 22.6 billion were mainly related to the divestment of interests in the Shah Deniz field and the South Caucasus pipeline and the sale of interests in licences on the NCS.assets. 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

CashIn 2017, cash flows used in financing activities were NOK 7.5 billion in 2015 and wereincreased by USD 3,863 million compared to 2016. The cash outflow was mainly relateddue to paymentsrepayment of dividends NOK 22.9 and repayments offinance debt, NOK 11.4, partially offset by issuance of new debt of NOK 32.2 billion. Cashincreased cash flow from collateral related to derivatives.

In 2016, cash flows used in financing activities were NOK 23.1 billion in 2014 and wereincreased by USD 1,230 million compared to 2015. The change is mainly relateddue to payments of dividends and repayments ofreduced cash flow from finance debt, partlypartially offset by issuance of new debt in November 2014 of NOK 20.6 billion. The amounts reported in 2013 were influenced by debt issuances of NOK 62.8 billion in total.reduced cash dividend due to the scrip dividend.

 

4.2.2 Financial assets and debt

Statoil has a strong balance sheet and considerable financial flexibility. The net debt ratio before adjustments was 25.6% at the end of 2015. Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments increased by NOK 32.8 billion in 2015 and was NOK 122.0 billion at the end of 2015.

Financial position and liquidity

Statoil's financial position is strong although itsstrong. The net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments at year end increaseddecreased from 19.0%34.4% in 20142016 to 25.6%27.9% in 2015.2017. See section 5.2 for non-GAAP measures for net debt ratio. Net interest-bearing debt increaseddecreased from NOK 89.2USD 18.4 billion to NOK 122.0USD 15.4 billion. During 20152017 Statoil's total equity decreasedincreased from NOK 381.2USD 35.1 billion to NOK 355.1USD 39.9 billion, mainly due to impairments recogniseda positive net income in 2015. Current level of net debt ratio is below levels from previous periods of low prices.2017. Cash flows provided by operating activities were reducedincreased in 20152017 mainly due to lower prices and increased prices. Cash flows used in investing activities were reduced in 2017, while cash flows used in investments.financing activities increased. Statoil introduced USD as its dividend declaration currency in the second quarter of 2015 announcement and has paid out four quarterly dividends in 2015.2017. For the fourth quarter of 20152017 the board of directors will propose to the annual general meeting (AGM) to maintain aincrease the dividend offrom USD 0.2201 to USD 0.23 per share for the fourth quarter 2015 and to introduce ashare. The two-year scrip dividend programme starting fromended as planned with the fourththird quarter 2015.2017 dividend.  For detailsfurther information, see section 6.1.1 Dividendsnote 17 Shareholders equity and dividends to the Consolidated financial statements.

.742Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil believes that, given its current liquidity reserves, including committed credit facilities of USD 5.0 billion and its access to various capital markets, Statoil will havehas sufficient capitalfunds available to meet its liquidity needs.needs, including working capital.

 

Funding needs arise as a result of Statoil’s general business activity.activities. Statoil generally seekseeks to establish financing at the corporate (top company) level. Project financing may also be used in cases involving joint ventures with other companies. Statoil aims to have access at all times to a variety of funding sources in respect of markets and instruments at all times, as well as maintaining relationships with a core group of international banks that provide various kindsa wide range of banking services.

 

Statoil has credit ratings from Moody's and Standard & Poor's (S&P). These provide credit ratings ensure necessary predictability when it comes to funding access at attractive terms and conditions. Ouron Statoil. Statoil’s current long-term ratings are Aa2A+ with a positive outlook and A+Aa3 with a stable outlook from Moody'sS&P and S&P,Moody’s, respectively. The outlook from S&P rating was revised from AA-“Stable” to “Positive” on credit watch negative14 November 2017 based on stronger than expected cash flow generation year to A+ with stable outlook on 22 February 2016. Moody’s placed Statoil and its peers on review for downgrade on 22 January 2016. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, Moody`s review of Statoil’s rating had not yet concluded. Both rating agency reviews have been triggered by low oil pricesdate. The short-term ratings are P-1 from Moody's and A-1 from S&P. In order to maintain financial flexibility going forward, weStatoil intend to keep key financial ratios at levels consistent with our objective of maintaining Statoil's long-term credit rating at least within the single A category on a stand-alone basis. 

88Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


  

The management of financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration funding sources, the maturity profile of non-current debt, interest rate risk, currency risk and available liquid assets. Statoil’s borrowings are denominated in various currencies and normally swapped into USD. In addition, interest rate derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, are used to manage the interest rate risk of our long-term debt portfolio. The Group's central treasury unit manages theStatoil’s funding and liquidity activities at Group level.are handled centrally.

 

We haveStatoil has diversified ourits cash investments across a range of financial instruments and counterparties to avoid concentrating risk in any one type of investment or any single country. As of 31 December 2015,2017, approximately 6%21% of ourStatoil’s liquid assets were held in USD-denominated assets, 17%21% in NOK, 51%32% in EUR, 7%10% in DKK and 15% in SEK, and 1% in GBP, before the effect of currency swaps and forward contracts. Approximately 72%49% of ourStatoil’s liquid assets were held in treasury bills and commercial papers, 23%paper, 42% in time deposits, 3% in money market funds and 2% at availablein bank deposits. As of 31 December 2015,2017, approximately 3%3.8% of ourStatoil’s liquid assets were classified as restricted cash (including collateral deposits).

 

OurStatoil’s general policy is to keep a liquidity reserve in the form of cash and cash equivalents or other current financial investments in ourStatoil’s balance sheet, as well as committed, unused credit facilities and credit lines in order to ensure that we haveStatoil has sufficient financial resources to meet our short-term requirements.

 

Long-term funding is raised when we identify a need is identified for such financing based on ourStatoil’s business activities, cash flows and required financial flexibility or when market conditions are considered to be favourable. Bond transactions were made in 2015 at very favourable terms, pre-funding longer-term commitments.

 

The group'sGroup's borrowing needs are usually covered through the issuingissuance of short-, medium- and long-term securities, including utilisation of a US Commercial Paper Programme (programme limit USD 4.05.0 billion) and a Shelf Registration Statement (unlimited) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the USA as well as through issues under a Euro Medium-Term Note (EMTN) Programme (programme limit updated to EUR 20.0 billion 5 February, 2016) listed on the London Stock Exchange. Committed credit facilities and credit lines may also be utilised. After the effect of currency swaps, the major part of ourStatoil’s borrowings is in USD.

 

Effective 14 December 2017,Statoil bought back USD 2.25 billion of issued bonds. During 20152017, Statoil issued no new bonds, with maturities from fourwhile in 2016 new debt securities equivalent to 20 years for a total amount of EUR 3.75USD 1.3 billion (NOK 32.1 billion). The bondsand in 2015 equivalent to USD 4.3 billion were issued in EUR and swapped into USD. issued. All of the bonds are unconditionally guaranteed by Statoil Petroleum AS. For more information, seesee note 18 Finance debt. to the Consolidated financial statements.

  

Statoil issued new debt securities in 2014 equivalent to NOK 20.5 billion and in 2013 equivalent to NOK 62.8 billion.

 

Financial indicators

 

FINANCIAL INDICATORS

FINANCIAL INDICATORS

 

 

 

 

 

Financial indicators

  For the year ended 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

FINANCIAL INDICATORS

FINANCIAL INDICATORS

  For the year ended 31 December

(in USD million)

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross interest-bearing financial liabilities 1)

284.5

231.6

182.5

Net interest-bearing liabilities before adjustments

122.0

89.2

58.0

Gross interest-bearing debt 1)

Gross interest-bearing debt 1)

28,274

31,673

32,291

Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments

Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments

15,437

18,372

13,852

Net debt to capital employed ratio 2)

Net debt to capital employed ratio 2)

25.6%

19.0%

14.0%

Net debt to capital employed ratio 2)

27.9%

34.4%

25.6%

Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted 3)

Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted 3)

26.8%

20.0%

15.2%

Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted 3)

29.0%

35.6%

26.8%

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents

76.0

83.1

85.3

Cash and cash equivalents

4,390

5,090

8,623

Current financial investments

Current financial investments

86.5

59.2

39.2

Current financial investments

8,448

8,211

9,817

ROACE 4)

(8.0%)

2.7%

11.3%

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 5)

1.1

9.4

7.5

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 4)

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 4)

6.8

0.9

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Defined as non-current and current finance debt.

Defined as non-current and current finance debt.

2)

As calculated according to IFRS. Net debt to capital employed ratio is the net debt divided by capital employed. Net debt is interest-bearing debt less cash and cash equivalents and current financial investments. Capital employed is net debt, shareholders' equity and minority interest.

As calculated according to IFRS. Net debt to capital employed ratio is the net debt divided by capital employed. Net debt is interest-bearing debt less cash and cash equivalents and current financial investments. Capital employed is net debt, shareholders' equity and minority interest.

3)

In order to calculate the net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted, Statoil makes adjustments to capital employed as it would be reported under IFRS to adjust for project financing exposure that does not correlate to the underlying exposure and to add into the capital employed measure interest-bearing elements which are classified together with non-interest-bearing elements under IFRS. See section 4.4.2 Net debt to capital employed ratio below for a reconciliation of capital employed and a description of why Statoil makes use of this measure.

In order to calculate the net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted, Statoil makes adjustments to capital employed as it would be reported under IFRS. Restricted funds held as financial investments in Statoil Forsikting AS and Collateral deposits has been added to the net debt whilst the SDFI part of the financial lease in the Snøhvit vessel has been taken out of the net debt. See section 5.2 Net debt to capital employed ratio for a reconciliation of capital employed and a description of why Statoil considers this measure to be useful.

4)

ROACE is equal to net income adjusted for financial items after tax, divided by average capital employed over the last 12 months. See section 4.4.1 Return on average capital employed (ROACE) for a reconciliation of ROACE and a description of why Statoil makes use of this measure.

For the purpose of these ratios, earnings consist of the income before (i) tax, (ii) minority interest, (iii) amortisation of capitalised interest and (iv) fixed charges (which have been adjusted for capitalised interest) and after adjustment for unremitted earnings from equity accounted entities. Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalised interest) and estimated interest within operating leases.

5)

Based on IFRS. For the purpose of these ratios, earnings consist of the income before (i) tax, (ii) minority interest, (iii) amortisation of capitalised interest and (iv) fixed charges (which have been adjusted for capitalised interest) and after adjustment for unremitted earnings from equity accounted entities. Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalised interest) and estimated interest within operating leases.

 

 

Gross interest-bearing debt

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    8975


 

Gross interest-bearing debt

Gross interest-bearing debt was NOK 284.5, NOK 231.6USD 28.3 billion, USD 31.7 billion and NOK 182.5USD 32.3 billion at 31 December 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The NOK 52.9USD 3.4 billion increasenet decrease from 20142016 to 20152017 was due to an increasea decrease in non-current finance debt of NOK 58.9USD 3.8 billion, offset by a reduction in current finance debt of NOK 6.0 billion. The NOK 49.0 billion increase from 2013 to 2014 was due to an increase in current finance debt of NOK 9.4USD 0.4 billion. The USD 0.6 billion and an increasenet decrease from 2015 to 2016 was due to a decrease in non-current finance debt of NOK 39.6USD 2.0 billion offset by an increase in current finance debt of USD 1.4 billion. Our weighted average annual interest rate was 3.39%3.50%, 3.78%3.41% and 4.06%3.39% at 31 December 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. OurStatoil’s weighted average maturity on finance debt was nine years at 31 December 2015, compared to2017, nine years at
31 December 2014 and 10 years at 31 December 2013.2016 and nine years at 31 December 2015.

 

Net interest-bearing debt

Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments were NOK 122.0USD 15.4 billion, NOK 89.2USD 18.4 billion and NOK 58.0USD 13.9 billion at 31 December 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The increasedecrease of NOK 32.8USD 2.9 billion from 20142016 to 20152017 was mainly related to an increasea decrease in gross interest-bearing debt of NOK 52.9USD 3.4 billion, an increase of current financial investments of USD 0.2 billion offset by a USD 0.7 billion decrease in part by ancash and cash equivalents. The increase of USD 4.5 billion from 2015 to 2016 was mainly related to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents andof USD 3.5 billion, a decrease of current financial investments of NOK 20.1USD 1.6 billion mainly due to negative net cash flow in 2015. The increase of NOK 31.2offset by a USD 0.6 billion from 2013 to 2014 was mainly related to an increasedecrease in gross interest-bearing debt of NOK 49.0 billion offset in part by an increase in cash and cash equivalents and current financial investments of NOK 17.9 billion.debt.

 

The net debt to capital employed ratio

The net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments was 25.6%27.9%, 19.0%34.4% and 14.0%25.6% in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 respectively.

 

The net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted (non-GAAP financial measure, see footnote three above) was 26.8%29.0%, 20.0%35.6% and 15.2%26.8% in 2017, 2016, and 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

The 6.86.5 percentage points decrease in net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments from 2016 to 2017 was related to the decrease in net interest-bearing debt of USD 2.9 billion in combination with an increase in capital employed of USD 1.9 billion. The 8.8 percentage points increase in net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments from 2015 to 2016 was related to the increase in net interest-bearing debt of USD 4.5 billion in combination with a decrease in capital employed of USD 0.7 billion.

The 6.6 percentage points decrease in net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted from 2016 to 2017 was related to the decrease in net interest-bearing debt adjusted of USD 3.1 billion in combination with an increase in capital employed adjusted of USD 1.7 billion. The 8.8 percentage points increase in net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted from 20142015 to 20152016 was related to the increase in net interest-bearing debt adjusted of NOK 34.4USD 4.6 billion in combination with an increasea decrease in capital employed adjusted of NOK 8.3 billion. The 4.8 percentage points increase in net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted from 2013 to 2014 was related to an increase in net interest-bearing debt adjusted of NOK 31.9 billion in combination with an increase in capital employed adjusted of NOK 57.0USD 0.6 billion.

 

Cash, cash equivalents and current financial investments

Cash and cash equivalents were NOK 76.0USD 4.4 billion, NOK 83.1USD 5.1 billion and NOK 85.3USD 8.6 billion at 31 December 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 respectively. See note 16 Cash and cash equivalents to the Consolidated financial statements for information concerning restricted cash. Current financial investments, which are part of ourStatoil’s liquidity management, amounted to NOK 86.5USD 8.4 billion, NOK 59.2USD 8.2 billion and NOK 39.2USD 9.8 billion at 31 December 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

4.2.3 Investments

OrganicIn 2017, capital expenditures (excluding acquisitions, capital leases and other investments with significant different cash flow pattern) amounted to USD 14.7 billion, or NOK 118.8 billion, for the year ended
31 December 2015.

Capital expenditures, defined as additions to property, plant and equipment (including capitalised financial leases), capitalised exploration expenditures, intangible assets, long-term share investments and investments in equity accounted companies,, amounted to NOK 125.5USD 10.8 billion, for the year ended 2015. Theof which USD 9.4 billion were organic capital expenditure level ended below original guidance due to reduced activity level and increased efficiency. This was partly offset by the development in the USDNOK exchange rate.expenditures.[5] 

 

In 2014,2016, capital expenditures were NOK 125.1USD 14.1 billion, compared to NOK 117.4 billion in 2013. The increase was primarily related to higher activity level in Development and Production International.

Organic capital expenditures (excluding acquisitions, capital leases and other investments with significant different cash flow pattern) amounted to NOK 118.8billion for the year ended 2015, or USD 14.7 billion. In 2014,of which organic capital expenditures amounted to NOK 121.6 billion, or USD 19.610.1 billion.

The section describes our estimated organic capital expenditure for 2016 relating to potential capital expenditure requirements for the principal investment opportunities available to us and other capital projects currently under consideration. The figure is based on Statoil developing organically, and it excludes possible expenditures relating to acquisitions. The expenditure estimates and descriptions of investments in the segment descriptions below could therefore differ materially from the actual expenditure. Organic capital expenditures are estimated to be around USD 13 billion in 2016.

Statoil finances its capital expenditures both internally and externally. For more information see section 4.2.2 Financial assets and debt.

 

In Norway, a substantial proportion of our 20162018 capital expenditures will be spent on ongoing development projects such as Johan Sverdrup, Gina KrogJohan Castberg, Martin Linge and Aasta Hansteen, in addition to various extensions, modifications and improvements on currently producing fields like Gullfaks, Oseberg and Troll.


[5]See section 5.2 for non-GAAP measures

 

90762   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Internationally, we currently estimate that a substantial proportion of our 20162018 capital expenditure will be spent on the following ongoing and planned development projects: Mariner in the UK, Peregrino in Brazil, and Julia, Stampede and Bakkenonshore activity in the US.

 

In midstream and downstream we currently estimate that mostWithin renewable energy, a substantial proportion of the 2016our 2018 capital expenditures willexpenditure is expected to be spent on Polarledthe Arkona offshore wind project in Germany.

Statoil finances its capital expenditures both internally and Johan Sverdrup export pipelines,externally. For more information, see Financial assets and debt earlier in addition to processing and transportation solutions related to Bakken, Marcellus and Eagle Ford in the US.this section.

 

As illustrated in the section 4.2.5 Principal contractual obligations later in this report, Statoil havehas committed to certain investments in the future. The further into the future, the more flexibility we will have to revise expenditure. This flexibility is partly dependent on the expenditure our partners in joint ventures agree to commit to. A large part of the capital expenditure for 20162018 is committed.

 

Statoil may alter the amount, timing or segmental or project allocation of our capital expenditures in anticipation of, or as a result of a number of factors outside our control.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201591


 

4.2.4 Impact of reduced prices

Our results are affected by the development in the price of raw materials and services that are necessary for the development and operation of oil and gas producing assets.

Cost development in the prices of goods, raw materials and services that are necessary for the development and operation of oil and gas producing assets can vary considerably over time and between each market segment.

The reduction in the oil price has been driving a decrease in commodities prices. Prices in supplier markets have been reduced and in several supplier market segments Statoil has achieved reduced rates compared to the 2013/2014 level. Such savings have been achieved both in new and renegotiated contracts. While some of the cost reductions relates to capitalised expenditures and thus only affects our annual results through decreased depreciation, certain elements of operating expenditures have also been affected by this cost reduction.

See the analysis of profit and loss in section 4.1 Operating and financial review as well section 2.3 Group Outlook.

4.2.5 Principal contractual obligations

The table summarises our principal contractual obligations, and other commercial commitments as of
31December 2015.

The table includes contractual obligations, but excludesexcluding derivatives and other hedging instruments, as well as, asset retirement obligations, as these obligationswhich for the most part are expected to lead to cash disbursements more than five years in the future. Obligations payable by Statoil to unconsolidated equity affiliates are included gross

Non-current finance debt in the table. Where Statoil includes bothtable represents principal payment obligations, including interest obligation. Obligations related to an ownership interest and the transport capacity cost for a pipeline and exceeding Statoil ownership in unconsolidated equity affiliates are included as part of the consolidated accounts, the amounts in the table include the transport commitments that exceed Statoil's ownership share. See section 5.2.3 Disclosures about market riskfor more information.other long-term commitments.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201777


 

As at 31 December 2015

Contractual obligations

Payment due by period 1)

(in NOK billion)

Less than 1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

More than 5 years

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undiscounted non-current finance debt

19.0

72.0

81.1

207.5

379.6

Minimum operating lease payments

25.6

28.8

17.6

27.8

99.8

Nominal minimum other long-term commitments2)

13.5

24.6

23.1

77.9

139.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

58.1

125.4

121.8

313.2

618.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

"Less than 1 year" represents 2015; "1-3 years" represents 2016 and 2017, "3-5 years" represents 2018 and 2019, while "More than 5 years" includes amounts for later periods.

2)

For further information see note 23 Other commitments and contingencies to the Consolidated financial statements.

 

As at 31 December 2017

Principal contractual obligations

Payment due by period 1)

(in USD million)

Less than 1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

More than 5 years

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undiscounted finance debt- principal and interest 2)

3,763

5,165

4,521

22,925

36,375

Minimum operating lease payments 3)

1,961

2,477

1,649

2,014

8,101

Nominal minimum other long-term commitments 4)

1,548

2,727

2,043

5,563

11,881

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total contractual obligations

7,273

10,370

8,213

30,502

56,357

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

"Less than 1 year" represents 2018; "1-3 years" represents 2019 and 2020, "3-5 years" represents 2021 and 2022, while "More than 5 years" includes amounts for later periods.

2)

See note 18  Finance debt to the Consolidated financial statements. The main differences between the table and the note is interest.

3)

See note 22 Leases to the Consolidated financial statements.

4)

See note 23 Other commitments and contingencies to the Consolidated financial statements.

Non-current finance debt in the table represents principal payment obligations. For information on interest commitments relating to long-term debt, reference is made to note 18 Finance debt and note 22 Leases to the Consolidated financial statements.



Statoil had contractual commitments of NOK 62.3 billionUSD 6,012 million at 31 December 2015.2017. The contractual commitments reflect Statoil's share and mainly comprise construction and acquisition of property, plant and equipment.

 

Statoil’s projected pension benefit obligation was NOK 60.1 billion,USD 8,286 million, and the fair value of plan assets amounted to NOK 45.2 billionUSD 5,687 million as of 31 December

2015. 2017. Company contributions are mainly related to employees in Norway. In 2014 SStatoil ASA made a decision to change the company’s pension plan in Norway from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan. The actual transitioning to the defined contribution plan took place in 2015, seeee note 19 Pensions to the Consolidated financial statements for more information.

92Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

4.2.6 Off balance sheet arrangements

This section describes various agreements that are not recognised in the balance sheet, such as operational leases and transportation and processing capacity contracts.

We have entered intoStatoil is party to various agreements, such as operational leases and transportation and processing capacity contracts, that are not recognised in the balance sheet. For more information, see Principalcontractualobligations in section 4.2.5 Principal contractual obligations 2.10 Liquidity and capital resources, and note 22 Leases to the Consolidated financial statements.

Statoil is also party to certain guarantees, commitments and contingencies that, pursuant to IFRS, are not necessarily recognised in the balance sheet as liabilities. See note 23 Other commitments and contingencies to the Consolidated financial statements for more information.

4.3 Accounting Standards (IFRS)

We prepare our Consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We prepared our first set of Consolidated financial statements pursuant to IFRS for 2007. The IFRS standards have been applied consistently to all periods presented in the Consolidated financial statements and when preparing an opening IFRS balance sheet as of 1 January 2006 (subject to certain exemptions allowed by IFRS 1) for the purpose of the transition to IFRS.

See note 2 Significant accounting policiesto the Consolidated financial statements for a discussion of key accounting estimates and judgements.

4.4 Non-GAAP measures

This section describes the non-GAAP financial measures that are used in this report.

We are subject to SEC regulations regarding the use of "non-GAAP financial measures" in public disclosures. Non-GAAP financial measures are defined as numerical measures that either exclude or include amounts that are not excluded or included in the comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which in our case refers to IFRS.

The following financial measures may be considered non-GAAP financial measures:

·Return on average capital employed (ROACE)

·Net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments

·Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted

·Organic capital expenditures

·Production cost per boe of entitlement volumes

For information regarding Organic capital expenditures see section 4.2.3 Investments.

For information regarding Production cost per barrel of entitlement volumes see note 27 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited) to the Consolidated financial statements.

4.4.1 Return on average capital employed (ROACE)

We use ROACE to measure the return on capital employed, regardless of whether the financing is through equity or debt.

In the group's view, this measure provides useful information for both the group and investors about performance during the period under evaluation. We make regular use of this measure to evaluate our operations. Our use of ROACE should not be viewed as an alternative to income before financial items, income taxes and minority interest, or to net income, which are measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or ratios based on these figures.

ROACE was negative 8.0% in 2015 compared to 2.7% in 2014 and 11.3% in 2013. The decrease from last year is due to the negative development in net income adjusted for financial items, combined with an increase in average capital employed.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20159378


Calculation of numerator and denominator used in ROACE calculation

For the year ended 31 December

 

 

(in NOK billion, except percentages)

2015

2014

2013

15-14 change

14-13 change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the year

(37.3)

22.0

39.2

 

 

-Net financial items

(10.6)

(0.0)

 

 

 

-Tax on financial items

10.2

9.2

 

 

 

+Accretion expense net after tax

(1.0)

(1.1)

 

 

 

+Net financial items adjusted after tax1)

 

 

4.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income adjusted for financial Items after tax (A1)

(37.9)

11.8

43.9

>(100%)

(73%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital employed before adjustments to net interest-bearing debt: 2)

 

 

 

 

 

Year End 2015

477.1

 

 

 

 

Year End 2014

470.4

470.4

 

 

 

Year End 2013

 

414.0

414.0

 

 

Year End 2012

 

 

359.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sum of capital employed for two years (B1)

947.5

884.4

773.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calculated average capital employed:

 

 

 

 

 

Average capital employed before adjustments to net interest-bearing debt (B1/2)

473.8

442.2

386.6

7%

14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calculated ROACE:

 

 

 

 

 

Return on average capital employed (A1/(B1/2))

(8.0%)

2.7%

11.3%

>(100%)

(77%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Calculation of financial items is revised for 2015 and 2014 ROACE definition. Net financial items after tax for 2013 includes financial items adjusted of negative NOK 4.6 billion and tax on financial items of NOK 9.2 billion.

2)

Capital employed before adjustments for each year is reconciled in the table in the section 4.4.2 Net debt to capital employed ratio

942   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


4.4.2 Net debt to capital employed ratio

In the Company's view, the calculated net debt to capital employed ratio gives a more complete picture of

the Group's current debt situation than gross interest-bearing financial liabilities.

The calculation uses balance sheet items relating to gross interest bearing financial liabilities and adjusts for cash, cash equivalents and current financial investments. Certain adjustments are made, since different legal entities in the Group lend to projects and others borrow from banks. Project financing through an external bank or similar institution will not be netted in the balance sheet and will over-report the debt stated in the balance sheet in relation to the underlying exposure in the Group. Similarly, certain net interest-bearing debts incurred from activities pursuant to the Owners Instruction from the Norwegian State are set off against receivables on the Norwegian State's direct financial interest (SDFI).

The net interest-bearing debt adjusted for these two items is included in the average capital employed.

The table below reconciles the net interest-bearing liabilities adjusted, capital employed and net debt to capital employed adjusted ratio with the most directly comparable financial measure or measures calculated in accordance with IFRS.

 

 

For the year ended 31 December

Calculation of capital employed and net debt to capital employed ratio

2015

2014

2013

(in NOK billion, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

354.7

380.8

355.5

Non-controlling interests (Minority interest)

0.3

0.4

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity (A)

355.1

381.2

356.0

 

 

 

 

 

Current bonds, bank loans, commercial papers and collateral liabilities

20.5

26.5

17.1

Bonds, bank loans and finance lease liabilities

264.0

205.1

165.5

 

 

 

 

 

Gross interest-bearing financial liabilities (B)

284.5

231.6

182.5

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

76.0

83.1

85.3

Current financial investments

86.5

59.2

39.2

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents and current financial investments (C)

162.4

142.3

124.5

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest-bearing liabilities before adjustments (B1) (B-C)

122.0

89.2

58.0

 

 

 

 

 

Other interest-bearing elements 1)

9.8

8.0

7.1

Marketing instruction adjustment 2)

(1.9)

(1.6)

(1.3)

Adjustment for project loan 3)

0.0

(0.1)

(0.2)

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest-bearing liabilities adjusted (B2)

129.9

95.6

63.6

 

 

 

 

 

Calculation of capital employed:

 

 

 

Capital employed before adjustments to net interest-bearing liabilities (A+B1)

477.1

470.4

414.0

Capital employed adjusted (A+B2)

485.0

476.7

419.6

 

 

 

 

 

Calculated net debt to capital employed:

 

 

 

Net debt to capital employed before adjustments (B1/(A+B1)

25.6%

19.0%

14.0%

Net debt to capital employed adjusted (B2/(A+B2)

26.8%

20.0%

15.2%

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Other interest-bearing elements are cash and cash equivalents adjustments regarding collateral deposits classified as cash and cash

equivalents in the Consolidated balance sheet but considered as non-cash in the non-GAAP calculations as well as financial investments in Statoil Forsikring AS classified as current financial investments.

2)

Marketing instruction adjustment is an adjustment to gross interest bearing financial debt due to the SDFI part of the financial lease in the Snøhvit vessels that are included in Statoil's Consolidated balance sheet.

3)

Adjustment for project loan is adjustment to gross interest-bearing debt due to the BTC project loan structure.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    95


 

­­­­5 Risk review2.11 RISK REVIEW

 

Statoil’s overall risk management includes identifying, evaluating and managing risk in all its activities to ensure safe operations and to achieve Statoil’s corporate goals.

5.1 Risk factorsRISK FACTORS

Statoil is exposed to a number of risks that could affect its operational and financial performance. In this section, some of the key risk factors are addressed.

 

5.1.1 Risks related to our business

This section describes the most significant potential risks relating to Statoil’s business:

Oil and natural gas prices risks

A prolonged period of low oil and/or natural gas prices would have a material adverse effect on Statoil.Statoil

The prices of oil and natural gas have fluctuated greatly in response to changes in many factors. Currently, Statoil is inWe have experienced a situation where oil and natural gas prices have declined substantially compared to levels seen over the last few years. There are several reasons for this decline, but fundamental market forces beyond the control of Statoil or other similar market participants have impacted and can continue to impact oil and natural gas prices in the future. Recently, as a consequence of agreements within Opec and also between Opec and some non-Opec countries, oil prices have increased due to expectations of an earlier tightening of market balances. However, the uncertainty about future developments still prevails.

 

Generally, Statoil does not and will not have control over the factors that affect the prices of oil and natural gas. These factors include:

·          economic and political developments in resource-producing regions

·          global and regional supply and demand

·          the ability of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) and/or other producing nations to influence global production levels and prices

·          prices of alternative fuels that affect the prices realised under Statoil's long-term gas sales contracts

·          government regulations and actions; including changes in energy and climate policies

·          global economic conditions

·          war or other international conflicts

·          changes in population growth and consumer preferences

·          the price and availability of new technology and

·          weather conditions

 

It is impossible to predict future price movements for oil and/or natural gas with certainty. A prolonged period of low oil and natural gas prices will adversely affect Statoil's business, the results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and Statoil's ability to finance planned capital expenditure, including possible reductions in capital expenditures which could lead to reduced reserve replacement. In addition to the adverse effect on revenues, margins and profitability from any fall in oil and natural gas prices, a prolonged period of low prices or other indicators could, if deemed to have longer term impact, lead to further reviews for impairment of the group's oil and natural gas properties. Such reviews would reflect the management's view of long-term oil and natural gas prices and could result in a charge for impairment that could have a significant effect on the results of Statoil's operations in the period in which it occurs. Changes in management’s view on long-term oil and/or natural gas prices or further material reductions in oil, gas and/or product prices could have an adverse impact on the economic viability of projects that are planned or in development.

Proved reserves and expected reserves calculation risks

Statoil’s crude oil and natural gas reserves are only estimates and Statoil’s future production, revenues and expenditures with respect to its reserves may differ materially from these estimates.

The reliability of proved reserve estimates depends on:

·          the quality and quantity of Statoil’s geological, technical and economic data

·          the production performance of Statoil’s reservoirs

·          extensive engineering judgments and

·          whether the prevailing tax rules and other government regulations, contracts and oil, gas and other prices will remain the same as on the date estimates are made

 

Proved reserves are calculated based on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requirements and may therefore differ substantially from Statoil’s view on expected reserves.

 

Many of the factors, assumptions and variables involved in estimating reserves are beyond Statoil’s control and may prove to be incorrect over time. The results of drilling, testing and production after the date of the estimates may require substantial upward or downward revisions in Statoil’s reserve data. The prices used for proved reserves are defined by the SEC and are calculated based on a 12 month un-weighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-monthfirst day of the month price for each month during the reporting year, leading to a forward price strongly linked to last

96Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


year’s price environment. Fluctuations in oil and gas prices will have a direct impact on Statoil’s

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201779


proved reserves. For fields governed by production sharing agreements (PSAs), a lower price may lead to higher entitlement to the production and increased reserves for those fields. Adversely, a lower price environment may also lead to lower activity resulting in reduced reserves. For PSAs these two effects may to some degree offset each other. In addition a low price environment may result in earlier shutdown due to uneconomic production. This will affect both PSAs and fields with concession types of agreement.

ExploratoryTechnical, commercial and country specific risks

Statoil is engaged in global exploration activities that involve a number of technical, commercial and country specific risks.

General risks are technical risks related to Statoil’s ability to conduct its seismic and drilling involves numerous risks, including the risk that Statoil willoperations in a safe and efficient manner and to encounter no commercially productive oil or naturaland gas reservoirs.  

This could materially and commercial risks related to Statoil’s ability to secure access to new acreage in an uncertain global competitive and political environment and competent personnel to perform exploration activities and mature resources along the value-chain. Country specific risks are related to security threats and compliance with and understanding of local laws or licence agreements. These risks may adversely affect Statoil's results. Statoil's exploration activities include accessing new acreage and maturing resources through high risk exploration drilling activities. These risks include risks associated with the execution of drilling and seismic operations and those associated with maturing unproven resources.

New acreage is primarily acquired through concessions, bidding rounds and acquisitions. Geological interpretations and successful exploration drilling and appraisal work leads to maturing and commercially attractive resources. Additionally, Statoil also needs to be focused on optimising its rig capacity by thoughtful deployment and redeployment. Given these risks and operational requirements, Statoil may not effectively acquire acreage, successfully conduct its drilling and appraisal work or optimise its rig capacity, which could result in a material adverse effect on the results of itsStatoil’s current operations and financial condition. Exploration activities involve the riskresults, and its long-term replacement of accidents and environmental incidents. Exploration activities also involve technical challenges related to operating in harsh environments as well as technologically demanding subsurface/geological challenges which Statoil may not effectively manage.reserves.

Decline reserves risks

If Statoil fails to acquire or discover and develop additional reserves, its reserves and production will decline materially from their current levels.levels

Successful implementation of Statoil's group strategy for value growth is critically dependent on sustaining its long-term reserve replacement. If upstream resources are not progressed to proved reserves in a timely manner, Statoil’s reserve base and thereby future production will gradually decline and future revenue will be reduced.

 

Statoil's future production is highly dependent on its success in acquiring or finding and developing additional reserves adding value. If unsuccessful, future total proved reserves and production will decline.

 

If thea low price environment continues for a substantial time, this may result in undeveloped acreage not being considered economically viable and consequently discovered resources not being matured to reserves. This may also lead to exploration areas not being explored for new resources and subsequently not being matured for development resulting in less future proved reserves. Successful implementation of Statoil’s improvement initiatives may partly offset this effect to some degree making new exploration areas and undeveloped acreage more economically attractive for exploration and development.

 

In a number of resource-rich countries, national oil companies control a significant proportion of oil and gas reserves that remain to be developed. To the extent that national oil companies choose to develop their oil and gas resources without the participation of international oil companies, or if Statoil is unable to develop partnerships with national oil companies, its ability to find and acquire or develop additional reserves will be more limited.

Statoil’s US onshore portfolio contains significant amount of undeveloped resources that depend on Statoil’s ability to develop these successfully. If commodity prices are low over a sustained period of time, this may result in Statoil deciding not to develop these resources or at least deferring development awaiting improved prices. Additionally, the development of these resources is subject to Statoil ability to continue to deliver on its US onshore strategy to enhance value and create robust developments.

Health, safety and environmental risks

Statoil is exposed to a wide range of health, safety and environmental risks that could result in significant losses.  losses.

Exploration, for, and the development, production, processing and transportation ofrelated to oil and natural gas, as well as development and operation of renewable energy production, can be hazardous and technicalhazardous. Technical integrity failures, operational failures, natural disasters or other occurrences can result in: loss of life, oil spills, gas leaks, loss of containment of hazardous materials, water contamination, blowouts, cratering, fires and equipment failure, among other things.

 

The risks associated with Statoil's activities are affected by the difficult geographies, climate zones and environmentally sensitive regions in which Statoil operates. All modes of transportation of hydrocarbons - including road, rail, sea or pipeline - are particularly susceptible to a loss of containment of hydrocarbons and other hazardous materials, and, given the high volumes involved, these could represent a significant risk to people and the environment. Offshore operations and transportation are subject to marine perils, including severe storms and other adverse weather conditions and vessel collisions. Onshore operations and transportation are subject to adverse weather conditions and accidents.incidents. Both onshore and offshore operations and transportation are subject to interruptions, restrictions or termination by government authorities based on safety, environmental or other considerations.

 

Policy and regulatory change dueThe transition to rising climate change concerns,a lower carbon economy risks

The transition to a lower carbon economy, and the physical effects of climate change, could impact Statoil’s business.

The transition to a low-carbon energy future poses fundamental strategic challenges for the oil and gas industry. The company review and monitor climate change-related business risks and opportunities, whether political, regulatory, market, physical or related to reputation impact. To assess climate-related business risk, Statoil uses tools such as internal carbon pricing, scenario planning and stress testing of the project portfolio against various oil and gas price assumptions. Statoil monitors technology developments and changes in regulation and assesses how these might impact the oil and gas price, the cost of developing new assets and the demand for oil and gas and opportunities in renewable energy and low carbon solutions.

802Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Regulatory and climate policy risk:Statoil expects and is preparing for policy and regulatory changes and policy measures targeted at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Stricter climate regulations and climate policies could impact Statoil's financial outlook, whether directly through changes in taxation and regulation, or indirectly through changes in consumer behaviour. The Paris Agreement on climate change entered into force in November 2016. Norway, collectively with the European Union, intends to deliver 40% reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. The national targets are intended to be strengthened every five years. Additionally, Norway has set an ambition to achieve close to net zero emissions by 2050. The implications for the industry are not clear, however requirements to reduce emissions could result in increased costs. Statoil's operations in Norway are subject to emissions taxes as well as emissions allowances granted for Statoil's larger European operations under the EU Emissions Trading System. The agreed strengthening of its upstream operations/activities. the European Union's emission trading scheme may result in higher costs for installations at the NCS as the price of the EU ETS emissions allowances is expected to increase significantly towards 2030.

Globally, Statoil expects greenhouse gas emission costs to increase from current levels beyond 2020 and to have a wider geographical range than today. ThereTo be prepared for a potential increased carbon price, Statoil uses an internal carbon price of minimum USD 50 for all projects after 2020 as part of the investment analysis and as a basis for investment decisions. In countries where a higher carbon price is continuing uncertainty over theseused and/or predicted, a higher price is used in the investment analysis. Other regulatory risks related to climate change include potential direct regulations, for example measures to improve energy efficiency such as fuel efficiency standards (e.g. in the EU) and policyrequirements to assess the use of power from shore for new offshore developments includingat the mechanisms that will be employed, and the level of global co-ordination and hence efficiency and uniformity of measures. This in turn leads to uncertainty over the eventual long-term implications to development project cost or operating cost and constraints. As an example, new technological solutions could be required.Norwegian Continental Shelf. This could result in increased cost or longer lead times, or have an impact on investment decisions for future projects. Climate relatedStatoil’s operational costs. Climate-related policy changes may also reduce access to prospective geographical areas for exploration and production in the future, and affect the demand for and prices of Statoil's products.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201597


Regulatory changes and other factors may encourage the development of low-carbon energy technologies such as renewable energy which could impact theStatoil’s ability to replace reserves.

Market-related risk: There is continuing uncertainty over demand for oil and gas particularly in specific regions.after 2030, due to factors such as technology development, climate policies, changing consumer behaviour and demographic changes. Statoil uses scenario analysis to outline different possible energy futures. Technology development and increased cost-competitiveness of renewable energy and low-carbon technologies represent both threats and opportunities for Statoil. As an example, the development of battery technologies could allow more intermittent renewables to be used in the power sector. This could especially impact Statoil's gas sales, particularly if subsidies of renewable energy in Europe were to increase.increase and/or costs of renewable energy were to significantly decrease. On the other hand, Statoil’s renewable energy business could be impacted if such subsidies were reduced or withdrawn. As such, there is significant uncertainty regarding the long-term implications to costs and opportunities for Statoil in the transition to a lower-carbon economy.

 

Statoil carefully monitorsReputational impact: Increased concern over climate change could lead to increased litigation against fossil fuel producers, as well as a more negative perception of the oil and assessesgas industry. The latter could impact talent attraction and retention.

Physical climate risk factors: Changes in physical climate parameters could impact Statoil's operations, for example through restrained water availability, rising sea level, changes in sea currents and increasing frequency of extreme weather events. Although Statoil’s facilities are designed to withstand extreme weather events, there is significant uncertainty regarding the magnitude of impact and time horizon for the occurrence of physical impacts of climate change, which leads to considerable uncertainty regarding the potential impact on Statoil. As most of Statoil’s physical assets are located offshore, the most relevant potential physical climate change. Developments in climate change could have a significant impact on Statoil's financial performance, profitability and outlook, whether directly through changes in taxation and regulation, or indirectly through changes in consumer behaviour.is expected to be rising sea level.

 

Portfolio sensitivity test: To assess energy transition-related risks, Statoil has assessedanalysed the sensitivity with changing the oil and gas prices and keeping other parameters constant, of its project portfolio (equity production and expected production from accessed exploration acreage) against the assumptions regarding commodity and carbon prices in the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Current Policies scenario, the IEA New Policies scenario and the IEA 450 scenario,energy scenarios, as laid out in their “World Economic Outlook 2015”2017” report. The assessmentsensitivity analysis demonstrated that the IEA’s “450 ppm scenario”, which is compatible with a global warming of maximum of two degrees Celsius with more than 50% probability, could have a negativepositive impact of approximately 5%around 20% on Statoil’s net present value compared to(NPV) when replacing Statoil’s internal planningprice assumptions as of 1 December 2015.2017 with the price assumptions in the IEA’s New Policies Scenario, a positive impact of 42% when using the price assumptions in the Current Policies Scenario, and a negative NPV impact of approximately 13% when using the price assumptions in the Sustainable Development Scenario. This assessmentsensitivity analysis is based on Statoil’s and the IEA’s energy scenario assumptions which may not be accurate and which are likely to changedevelop over time as new information becomes available. Scenarios should not be mistaken for forecasts or predictions. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the assessment, which is presented in more detail in Statoil ASA’s 20152017 Sustainability report, is a reliable indicator of the actual impact of climate change on Statoil.Statoil’s portfolio.

 

It is not possible to predict the exact magnitude of the physical impact of climate change on Statoil's operations. However, effects of climate change could result in less stable weather patterns, which would result in more severe storms and other weather conditions that could interfere with Statoil's operations. Changes in physical climate parameters could impact the costs of Statoil's operations, for example through restrained water availability and prolonged droughts, or through increasing frequency of other extreme weather events.

Hydraulic fracturing risk

Statoil is exposed to risks as a result of its hydraulic fracturing usage.usage

Statoil's US operations use hydraulic fracturing which is subject to a range of applicable federal, state and local laws, including those discussed under the heading "Legal and Regulatory Risks". Fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of crude oil and/or natural gas from dense subsurface rock formations. Statoil's hydraulic fracturing and fluid handling operations are designed and operated to minimise the risk, if any, of subsurface migration of hydraulic fracturing fluids and spillage or mishandling of hydraulic fracturing fluids, however,fluids. However, a proven case of subsurface migration of hydraulic fracturing fluids or a case of spillage or mishandling of hydraulic fracturing fluids during these activities could potentially subject Statoil to civil and/or criminal liability and the possibility of substantial costs, including environmental remediation, depending on the circumstances of the underground migration, spillage, or mishandling, the nature and scope of the underground migration, spillage, or mishandling, and the applicable laws and regulations.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201781


 

In addition, various states and local governments have implemented, or are considering, increased regulatory oversight of hydraulic fracturing through additional permit requirements, operational restrictions, disclosure requirements and temporary or permanent bans. New or further changes in laws and regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or otherwise banning or limiting, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete oil and natural gas wells in shale formations, cause operational delays, increase costs of regulatory compliance or in exploration and production, which could adversely affect Statoil's US onshore business and the demand for fracturing services.

Security threats and Cyber-attacks risks

Statoil is exposed to security threats that could have a materially adverse effect on Statoil's results of operations and financial condition.condition

Although Statoil has security barriers, policies and risk management processes in places which are designed to protect its assets against a range of security threats, no assurances can be made that such attacks will not occur and adversely impact its operations. Security threats such as acts of terrorism and cyber-attacks against Statoil's production and exploration facilities, offices, pipelines, means of transportation or computer systems or breaches of Statoil's security system, could result in significant losses. No assurances can be made that such attacks will not occur in the future and adversely impact its operations. Failure to manage the foregoing risks could result in injury or loss of life, damage to the environment, damage to or the destruction of wells and production facilities, pipelines and other property. Statoil could face, among other things, regulatory action, legal liability, damage to its reputation, a significant reduction in revenues, an increase in costs, a shutdown of operations and a loss of its investments in affected areas. Statoil does not purchase cyber risks insurance because the available insurance products do not provide satisfactory coverage.

Statoil's crisis management systems may prove inadequate.

Statoil has crisis management plans and capability to deal with emergencies at every level of its operations. If Statoil does not respond or is perceived not to have responded in an appropriate manner to either an external or internal crisis, its business, operations and reputation could be severely affected. For Statoil's most important activities, it has also developed business continuity plans to carry on or recover operations following a disruption or incident. Inability to restore or replace critical capacity to an agreed level within an agreed time frame could prolong the impact of any disruption and could severely affect Statoil's business and operations.

Statoil encounters competition from other oil and gas companies in all areas of its operations

Some of Statoil's larger, financially stronger competitors may be able to pay more to gain access to resources, while its smaller competitors may be able to move faster and gain earlier access than Statoil. Gaining access to profitable resources either through the acquisition of licences, exploratory prospects or producing properties is key to ensuring the long-term health and sustainability of the business and Statoil's failure to do so could have an adverse impact on its performance.

Technology is a key competitive advantage in Statoil's industry and a larger company may be able to invest more in developing or acquiring intellectual property rights to technology that Statoil may require. Should Statoil's innovation lag behind the industry, its performance could be impeded.

98Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Statoil's development projects and production activities involve many uncertainties and operating risks that can prevent Statoil from realising profits and cause substantial losses.

Oil and gas projects may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled for many reasons, including equipment shortages or failures, natural hazards, unexpected drilling conditions or reservoir characteristics, irregularities in geological formations, accidents, mechanical and technical difficulties or challenges due to new technology. This is particularly relevant because of the physical environments in which some of Statoil’s projects are situated. Many of Statoil's development and production projects are located in deep waters or other harsh environments - such as the Gulf of Mexico in the US, the Flemish Pass in Canada or the Barents Sea in Norway, or have challenging field characteristics such as its heavy oil projects in Brazil (Peregrino), Norway (Grane) and the UK (Mariner). In US onshore, low regional prices may cause certain areas to be unprofitable and the company may curtail production until prices recover. There is therefore a risk that Statoil undertakes development projects that do not yield expected returns, especially in the current environment of decreasing oil and gas prices combined with the relatively high levels of tax and government take in several jurisdictions, including Norway.

Capital expenditures in the oil and gas industry have increased over the last few years due to a high activity level and more complex and capital intensive development projects. This, combined with prolonged low oil and gas prices, could reduce the returns and erode the profitability of some of Statoil's projects and capital programs.

As a response to these challenges, Statoil will need at all times to evaluate profitability and robustness of projects and consider postponing or stopping projects, adjusting strategies and targets or withdrawing from certain geographical areas.

Statoil faces challenges in achieving its strategic objective of successfully exploiting profitable growth opportunities

An important element of Statoil's strategy is to continue to pursue attractive and profitable growth opportunities available to it by both enhancing and repositioning its asset portfolio and expanding into new markets. The opportunities that Statoil is actively pursuing may involve the acquisition of businesses or properties that complement or expand its existing portfolio. The challenges related to the renewal of Statoil's upstream portfolio is growing due to increasing global competition for access to opportunities.

Statoil's ability to successfully implement this strategy will depend on a variety of factors, including its ability to:

·identify acceptable opportunities

·negotiate favourable terms

·develop new market opportunities or acquire properties or businesses promptly and profitably

·integrate acquired properties or businesses into Statoil's operations

·arrange financing, if necessary and

·comply with legal regulations

As Statoil pursues business opportunities in new and existing markets, it anticipates significant investments and costs in connection with the development of such opportunities. Statoil may incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with assets or businesses acquired. Any failure by Statoil to successfully pursue and exploit new business opportunities could result in financial losses and inhibit growth. Any such new projects Statoil acquires will require additional capital expenditure and will increase the cost of its discoveries and development. These projects may also have different risk profiles than Statoil's existing portfolio. These and other effects of such acquisitions could result in Statoil having to revise either or both of Statoil's forecasts with respect to unit production costs and production.

In addition, the pursuit of acquisitions or new business opportunities could divert financial and management resources away from Statoil's day-to-day operations to the integration of acquired operations or properties. Statoil may require additional debt or equity financing to undertake or consummate future acquisitions or projects, and such financing may not be available on terms satisfactory to Statoil, if at all, and it may, in the case of equity, be dilutive to Statoil's earnings per share.

The profitability of Statoil’s oil and gas production may be affected by limited transportation infrastructure when a field is in a remote location.

Statoil's ability to exploit economically any discovered petroleum resources beyond its proved reserves will depend, among other factors, on the availability of the infrastructure required to transport oil and gas to potential buyers at a commercially acceptable price. Oil is transported by vessels, rail or pipelines to refineries, and natural gas is usually transported by pipeline or by vessels (for liquid natural gas) to processing plants and end users. Statoil may not be successful in its efforts to secure transportation and markets for all of its potential production.

 

Statoil is exposed to security threats on its information systems and digital infrastructure that could harm its assets and operations.

Statoil’s security barriers are intended to protect its information systems and digital infrastructure from being compromised by unauthorised parties. Failure to maintain and develop these barriers may affect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of its information systems and digital infrastructure, including those critical to Statoil’s operations. Threats to Statoil’s information systems could result in significant financial damage to Statoil. Threats to Statoil’s industrial control systems are not limited by geography as Statoil’s digital infrastructure is accessible globally, and incidents in the industry in recent years have shown that parties who are able to circumvent barriers aimed at securing industrial control systems are capable and willing to perform attacks that destroy, disrupt or otherwise compromise operations. Such attacks could result in material losses or loss of life with consequent financial implications.

Crisis management systems risks

Statoil's crisis management systems may prove inadequate

Statoil has plans and capability to deal with crisis and emergencies at every level of its operations (ie; plant fires, terror, well instability etc). If Statoil does not respond or is perceived not to have responded in an appropriate manner to either an external or internal crisis, or if its plans to carry on or recover operations following a disruption or incident are not effected quickly enough, its business, operations and reputation could be severely affected. Inability to restore or replace critical capacity to an agreed level within an agreed time frame could prolong the impact of any disruption and could severely affect Statoil's business and operations.

Increased competition risks

Statoil encounters competition from other oil and gas companies in all areas of its operations

Statoil may experience increased competition from larger players with stronger financial resources and smaller ones with increased agility and flexibility. Gaining access to commercial resources via licence acquisition, exploration, or development of existing assets is key to ensuring the long-term economic viability of the business and failure to address this could negatively impact future performance.

Technology is a key competitive advantage in Statoil's industry and our competition may be able to invest more in developing or acquiring intellectual property rights to technology that Statoil may require to remain competitive. Should Statoil's innovation and digitalisation lag behind the industry, its performance could be impeded.

Project development and production activities risks

Statoil's development projects and production activities involve many uncertainties and operating risks that can prevent Statoil from realising profits and cause substantial losses

Oil and gas projects may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled for many reasons, including equipment shortages or failures, natural hazards, unexpected drilling conditions or reservoir characteristics, irregularities in geological formations, accidents, mechanical and technical difficulties or challenges due to new technology. This is particularly relevant because of the physical environments in which some of Statoil’s projects are situated. Many of Statoil's development and production projects are located in deep waters or other harsh environments or have challenging field characteristics. In US onshore, low regional prices may cause certain areas to be unprofitable and the company may curtail production until prices recover. There is therefore a risk that prolonged low oil and gas prices, combined with the relatively high levels of tax and government take in several jurisdictions, could erode the profitability of some of Statoil’s projects.

Strategic objective risks

Statoil faces challenges in achieving its strategic objective of successfully exploiting profitable growth opportunities

822Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil intends to continue to nurture attractive commercial opportunities in order to sustain future growth. This may involve acquisition of new businesses or properties to expand the existing portfolio or to move into new markets. This challenge will grow as global competition for access to new opportunities rises.

Statoil’s ability to increase this optionality depends on several factors; including the ability to:

·maintain and impart Statoil’s zero-harm safety culture

·identify suitable opportunities

·negotiate favourable terms

·develop new market opportunities or acquire properties or businesses in an agile and efficient way

·effectively integrate acquired properties or businesses into Statoil's operations

·arrange financing, if necessary and

·comply with legal regulations

Statoil anticipates significant investments and costs as it cultivates business opportunities in new and existing markets, and this process may incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with assets or businesses acquired. Failure by Statoil to successfully pursue and exploit new business opportunities could result in financial losses and inhibit growth. New projects may have different risk profiles than Statoil's existing portfolio. These and other effects of such acquisitions could result in Statoil having to revise its forecasts either or both with respect to unit production costs and production.

In addition, the pursuit of acquisitions or new business opportunities could divert financial and management resources away from Statoil's day-to-day operations to the integration of acquired operations or properties. Statoil may require additional debt or equity financing to undertake or consummate future acquisitions or projects, and such financing may not be available on terms satisfactory to Statoil, if at all, and it may, in the case of equity, be dilutive to Statoil's earnings per share.

Limited transportation infrastructure risks

The profitability of Statoil’s oil and gas production may be affected by limited transportation infrastructure when a field is in a remote location

Statoil's ability to exploit economically any discovered petroleum resources beyond its proved reserves will depend, among other factors, on the availability of the infrastructure required to transport oil and gas to potential buyers at a commercially acceptable price. Oil is transported by vessels, rail or pipelines to refineries, and natural gas is usually transported by pipeline or by vessels (for liquid natural gas) to processing plants and end users. Statoil may not be successful in its efforts to secure transportation and markets for all of its potential production.

International political, social and economic risks

Some of Statoil's international interests are located in regions where political, social and economic instability could adversely impact Statoil’s business.business

Statoil has assets and operations located in politically, socially and economically diverse regions around the worldglobally where potentialpotentially negative economic, social, and political developments such as expropriation, nationalisation of property, unilateral change of contracts or regulations, civil strife, strikes, political unrest, war, terrorism, border disputes, guerrilla activities, insurrections, piracy and the imposition of international sanctions or other events

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201599


could occur. PoliticalThese political risks and security threats require continuous monitoring. Adverse and hostile actions against Statoil's staff, its facilities, its transportation systems and its digital infrastructure (cybersecurity) couldmay cause harm to people and disrupt Statoil's operations and further business opportunities in these or other regions, lead to a decline in production and otherwise adversely affect Statoil's business. This could have a materially adverse effect on Statoil's operations’ results of operations and its financial condition.

International governmental and regulatory framework risks

100Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Statoil's operations are subject to dynamic political and legal factors in the countries in which it operates.operates

Statoil has assets in a number of countries with emerging or transitioning economies that, in part or in whole, lack well-functioning and reliable legal systems, where the enforcement of contractual rights is uncertain or where the governmental and regulatory framework is subject to unexpected change. Statoil's exploration and production activities in these countries are often undertaken together with national oil companies and are subject to a significant degree of state control. In recent years, governments and national oil companies in some regions have begun to exercise greater authority and to impose more stringent conditions on companies engaged in exploration and production activities. Intervention by governments in such countries can take a wide variety of forms, including:

·          restrictions on exploration, production, imports and exports

·          the awarding or denial of exploration and production interests

·          the imposition of specific seismic and/or drilling obligations

·          price and exchange controls

·          tax or royalty increases, including retroactive claims

·          nationalisation or expropriation of Statoil's assets

·          unilateral cancellation or modification of Statoil's licence or contractual rights

·          the renegotiation of contracts

·          payment delays and

·          currency exchange restrictions or currency devaluation

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201783


The likelihood of these occurrences and their overall effect on Statoil vary greatly from country to country and are hard to predict. If such risks materialise, they could cause Statoil to incur material costs and/or cause Statoil's production to decrease, potentially having a materially adverse effect on Statoil's operations or financial condition.

International tax regimes risks

Statoil is exposed to potentially adverse changes in the tax regimes of each jurisdiction in which Statoil operates.operates

Statoil has business operations in many countries around the world. Changes in the tax laws of the countries in which Statoil operates could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and results of operations.

Foreign exchange risks

Statoil faces foreign exchange risks that could adversely affect the results of Statoil’s operations.operations

Statoil's business faces foreign exchange risks and this is managed with USD as the base currency.risks. Statoil has a large percentage of its revenues and cash receipts denominated in USD and sales of gas and refined products are mainly denominated in EUR and GBP. Further, Statoil pays a large portion of its income taxes, and a share of our operating expenses and capital expenditures, in NOK. The majority of Statoil's long term debt has USD exposure.

 

Trading and supply activities risks

Statoil is exposed to risks relating to trading and supply activities.activities

Statoil is engaged in substantial trading and commercial activities in the physical markets. Statoil also uses financial instruments such as futures, options, over-the-counter (OTC) forward contracts, market swaps and contracts for differences related to crude oil, petroleum products, natural gas and electricity in order to manage price volatility. Statoil also uses financial instruments to manage foreign exchange and interest rate risk. Although Statoil believes it has established appropriate risk management procedures, tradingTrading activities involve elements of forecasting, and Statoil bears the risk of market movements, the risk of losses if prices develop contrary to expectations, and the risk of default by counterparties.

Failure to comply with anti-corruption, anti-bribery laws and Statoil Code of Conduct risks

Non-compliance with anti-bribery, anti-corruption and other applicable laws, including failure to meet Statoil’s ethical requirements, exposes Statoil to legal liability and damage to its reputation, business and shareholder value.value

Statoil has activities in countries which present corruption risks and which may have weak legal institutions, lack of control and transparency. In addition, governments play a significant role in the oil and gas sector, through ownership of resources, participation, licensing and local content which leads to a high level of interaction with public officials. Statoil is, through its international activities, subject to anti-corruption and bribery laws in multiple jurisdictions, including the Norwegian Penal code, the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK Bribery Act. A violation of any applicable anti-corruption and bribery laws could expose Statoil to investigations from multiple authorities, and any violations of laws may lead to criminal and/or civil liability with substantial fines. Incidents of non-compliance with applicable anti-corruption and bribery laws and regulations and the Statoil Code of Conduct could be damaging to Statoil's reputation, competitiveness and shareholder value.

 

Inadequate insurance coverage risk

Statoil’s insurance coverage may not provide adequate protection.protection

Statoil maintains insurance coverage that includes coverage for physical damage to its oil and gas properties, third-party liability, workers' compensation and employers' liability, general liability, sudden pollution and other coverage. Statoil's insurance coverage includes deductibles that must be met prior to recovery. Statoil's external insurance is subject to caps, exclusions and limitations, and there is no assurance that such coverage will adequately protect Statoil against liability from all potential consequences and damages.

 

Statoil's efficiency change agenda may impact the developmentInefficient operations and lack of Statoil's business and its financial results.new technology risks

In 2014, Statoil announced an extensive efficiency change strategy in order to improve efficiency across the organisation in light of the decline in oil and gas prices. Two programmes were launched, the Statoil Technical Efficiency Programme (STEP)Statoil’s future performance depends on efficient operations and the organisational efficiency programme (OE).ability to develop and deploy new technologies and new products

Our ability to remain efficient, to develop and adapt to new technology, to seek profitable renewable energy and other low-carbon energy solutions, are key success factors for future business. There is a riskpossibility of Statoil not being able to define and implement the activities relatednecessary changes due to the organisation’s capability, external competition or underestimated cost savings without adversely effectingof implementing new technology. Any of these factors may have an adverse effect on Statoil’s future business goals or achieving the necessary cost savings and increases in efficiencygoals.

 

Failure to secure capable and competent workforce risk

Statoil may fail to secure the right level of workforce competence and capacity over the short and medium term

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015101


The external uncertainty of the future of the oil industry in light of reduced oil and natural gas prices and climate policy changes, creates a risk in ensuring a robust workforce through industry cycles. The oil industry is a long term business and needs to take a long term perspective on workforce capacity and competence. Given the current extensive change agenda there is a risk that Statoil will fail to secure the right level of workforce competence and capacity.

 

842Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


International sanctions and trade restrictions risks

Statoil’s activities in certain countries may be affected by international sanctions.sanctions and trade restrictions

Statoil, like other major international energy companies, has a geographically diverse portfolio of reserves and operational sites,projects which may expose its business and financial affairs to political and economic risks, including operations in areas subject to sanctions and international trade restrictions. 

Sanctions and trade restrictions are often complex and changes in these laws and regulations can come about on short notice and be hard to predict. For example in 2017 there have been trade sanctions or with sanctioned entities.targeting certain activity in Venezuela where Statoil has activities.

While this remains the case, Statoil's business portfolio is evolving and will constantly be subject to review.

 

Russia

New or additional trade sanctions could be imposed on countries where we have business activities. Statoil holds a 30% non-operating interest in a production sharing agreement related to the Kharyaga fieldcould in the Nenets Autonomous Area in the Russian Federation. The Kharyaga field produces conventional oil from the Timan Pechora basin onshore in North West Russia. Statoil is further engaged in a strategic cooperation with Rosneft Oil Company (Rosneft) including a joint cooperation project aimed at undertaking seismic surveys and geological exploration, appraisal, development and production of potential hydrocarbons in four licences on the Russian continental shelf - the Magadan 1, Lisyansky and Kashevarovsky licences in the Sea of Okhotsk (south of the Arctic Circle), and the Perseevsky licence in the Barents Sea (north of the Arctic Circle). Additionally there are two joint cooperation projects onshore; pilot drilling and testing of the onshore heavy oil reservoir layer PK1 in the North Komsomolsky discovery, and the Domanik Sediments Difficult-to-Extract Hydrocarbons Project, aimed at pilot drilling and testing of the limestone Domanik formation in the Russian Volga-Urals basin. For each of these projects, Rosneft holds the majority interest, while Statoil holds a minority interest.

Sanctions imposed by Norway, the EU and the USA target, among others, Russia’s financial and energy sectors, including certain companies such as Rosneft and various affiliates, and specific activities related to oil exploration and production in the Arctic offshore area, and in deepwater or shale formation projects. Aspects of those measures affect Statoil’s business activities in Russia. The continued progress and financing of the joint projects are, in part, dependent on Statoil and the joint ventures securing various governmental authorisations and clarifications from such governmental authorities also going forward. Statoil continues to pursue the above-described projects within the limitations of current sanctions. However, due to current and possible future sanctions, there is no certainty that the projects can be progressed and concluded as initially planned.

Iran

Certain countries, including Iran, have been identified by the US government as state sponsors of terrorism.

Historically, Statoil held interests in the Iranian South Pars offshore phase 6, 7 and 8 gas development project in the Persian Gulf. Statoil was also an owner of a significant interest in the Anaran block and held a 100% interest in the Khorramabad exploration block – both in Iran. Due to the increase of international sanctions against Iran, Statoil in 2009 voluntarily offered officials from the US State Department information about its Iranian business activity. In October 2010 the US State Department announced under the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act of 2010 (CISADA), Statoil to be eligible to avoid retaliatory measures relating to its activities in Iran, due to Statoil’s pledge to end its investments in Iran’s energy sector.

Following the January 2016 sanctions relief, offered Iran by the US in accordance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action entered into by Iran and the P5+1, secondary US nuclear sanctions on Iran have been scaled back. Despite this, other secondary and primary US sanctions on Iran remain in place. Since 2010, Statoil’s activities relating to Iran have consisted of closing its historic projects in an orderly and compliant manner consistent with applicable sanctions. This has also included efforts to settle, to the extent possible, outstanding tax and social security obligations and recovery rights related to the above mentioned projects. Statoil has at regular intervals kept both relevant Norwegian as well as US authorities updated of such continued efforts.

A company found to have violated US sanctions against Iran could become subject to various types of sanctions, including (but not limited to) denial of US bank loans, restrictions on the importation of goods produced by the sanctioned entity, the prohibition on property transactions by the sanctioned entity in which the property is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and prohibition of transfers of credit or payments via financial institutions in which the sanctioned entity has any interest.

General

The legislation and rules governing sanctions are complex, constantly evolving and may not be consistent across jurisdictions. Changes in any of these laws or policies or the implementation thereof can be unpredictable. Statoil's business is dynamic and the above facts accordingly, may change over time. Moreover, the description does not fully reflect all parts of Statoil's business where a particular focus on sanctions compliance might be warranted. Lastly, it should be understood that Statoil in the future could also decide to take part in new and additional business activity also involving sanctioned targets in various parts of the world whilst still remaining compliant with applicablewhere sanctions laws.and trade restrictions are particularly relevant.

While Statoil isremains committed to doingdo business in compliance with all applicable laws, howeversanctions and trade restrictions, there can be no assurance that no Statoil entity, officer, director, employee or affiliates of Statoil or their respective officers, directors, employees or agents areagent is not in violation of such laws. Any such violation of applicable laws could result in substantial civil and/or criminal penalties and mightcould materially adversely affect Statoil's business and results of operations or financial condition.

Statoil holds an interest in several on- and offshore oil and gas projects in Russia. Most of these projects result from a strategic cooperation with Rosneft Oil Company (Rosneft) initiated in 2012. In each of these projects, Rosneft holds the majority interest. A minority of the projects are in Arctic offshore and/or deep-water areas. The Norwegian, EU and U.S. sanctions adopted on Russia target several sectors – including the financial and energy sector. Accordingly, certain Russian energy companies have been particularly targeted under the sanctions – including Rosneft. This being the case, the sanctions in place affect the way Statoil conducts its business in the country. Moreover, Statoil’s ability to continue to progress its projects in Russia is in part relying on government authorizations as well as the future of sanctions and trade controls. While Statoil continues to pursue its business in Russia within existing sanctions and trade controls, possible future developments could impact Statoil’s ability to continue and conclude these projects as earlier envisaged. 

In Venezuela, Statoil is also awarea 9,67% shareholder in the mixed company Petrocedeno majority owned by Venezuelan national oil company PDVSA. In addition, Statoil holds a 51% interest in a gas licence offshore Venezuela. During 2017, various sanctions and trade controls have been adopted targeting certain Venezuelan individuals as well as the Government of initiatives by certain US statesVenezuela and institutional investors, such as pension funds,PDVSA. The sanctions and trade controls in place restrict the way in which Statoil can conduct its business in the country. The current sanctions and trade restrictions, alone or in combination with other factors, could in the future further negatively impact Statoil’s position and ability to adopt or consider adopting laws, regulations or policies requiring, among other things, divestment from, reporting of interestscontinue its business projects in or agreements not to make future investments in, companies that do business with countries that, among other things, are designated as state sponsors of terrorism. These policies could have an adverse impact on investments by certain investors in Statoil’s securities.Venezuela.

  

102Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Disclosure Pursuant to Section 13 (r) of the Exchange Act

The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 ("ITRA") created a new subsection (r) in Section 13 of the Exchange Act which requires a reporting issuer to provide disclosure if the issuer or any of its affiliates engaged in certain enumerated activities relating to Iran, including activities involving the Government of Iran.

Statoil is providing the following disclosure pursuant to Section 13(r). of the Exchange Act.

 

Statoil is a party to agreements with the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), namely, a Development Service Contract for South Pars Gas Phases 6, 7 & 8 (offshore part), an Exploration Service Contract for the Anaran Block and an Exploration Service Contract for the Khorramabad Block, which are located in Iran. Statoil's operational obligations under these agreements have terminated and the licenseslicences have been abandoned.

The cost recovery programprogramme for these contracts was completed in 2012, except for the recovery of tax and obligations to the Social Security organisationOrganisation (SSO). Statoil's activity

Since 2013, after closing Statoil’s office in Iran, during 2015Statoil's activity was focused on a final settlement with the Iranian tax authorities and the SSO authorities relating to the above mentionedabove-mentioned agreements.

During 20152017 Statoil paid the equivalent of USD 3.200.01 million in tax and SSO to Iranian authorities in local currency (Iranian Rials), from which USD 0.04 million has been booked as expenses in 2015 and the rest have been reversed from previous years’ accruals.authorities. Also during 20152017 Statoil paid the equivalent of USD 0.02 million713 in stamp duty to Iran Tax Organisation. All payments were made in local currency (Iranian Rials). The funds utilised for these purposes were held by Statoil in EN Bank (Iran).

During 2015 Statoil also received the equivalent of USD 0.48 million as insurance payment related to its legacy South Pars business. Also this insurance payment has been booked as revenue in 2015.

During 2015 Additionally, NIOC, on behalf of Statoil, in 2017 paid a tax obligation of USD 1.65.13 million equivalent in Iranian Rial to the local tax authorities. The amount was settled towards historical recoverable costs from NIOC to Statoil. Statoil is not involved in any other activities in Iran.

 

Since 2009 Statoil has transparently and regularly provided information about its Iran related activity to the US State Department as well as to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

In a letter from the US State Department of 1November1 November 2010, Statoil was informed that the company was not considered to be a company of concern based on its previous Iran-related activities.

 

Statoil generatedearned no net profit from the aforementioned activity in 2015.2017 activities. Payments of the above mentionedabove-mentioned nature are expected tomay also be made also in 2016,2018, in relation to Statoil’s continued winding-down efforts.efforts to settle all remaining obligations.

 

In addition,

Statoil, has in the course of 2015 paid four annual patent fees in Iran of in total EUR 347 (appr. USD 420). The payment of these patent fees will be discontinued in 2016.Annual Report on Form 20-F 201785


 

5.1.2 Legal and regulatory risks

This section discusses potential legalHealth, safety and regulatory risks related to the legal context of our business operations, such as having to comply with newenvironmental laws and regulations.

regulations risks

Compliance with health, safety and environmental laws and regulations that apply to Statoil's operations could materially increase itsStatoil’s costs. The enactment of such laws and regulations in the future is uncertain.

 

Statoil incurs, and expects to continue to incur, substantial capital, operating, maintenance and remediation costs relating to compliance with increasingly complex laws and regulations for the protection of the environment and human health and safety, including:

·          costs as a result of stricter climate regulations and a higher price on greenhouse gas emissions

·          costs of preventing, controlling, eliminating or reducing certain types of emissions to air and discharges to the sea including costs incurred in connection with government action to address the risk of spills and concerns about the impacts of climate change

·          remediationremedying of environmental contamination and adverse impacts caused by Statoil's activities or accidents at various facilities owned or previously owned by Statoil

·decommissioning obligations and at third-party sites where Statoil's products or waste have been handled or disposed ofrelated costs

·          compensation of cost related to persons and/or entities claiming damages as a result of Statoil's activities or accidents and

·costs in connection with the decommissioning of drilling platforms and other facilities

 

For example, under the Norwegian Petroleum Act of 29 November 1996, as a holder of licences on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS), StatoilStatoil`s activity is increasingly subject to statutory strict liability in respect of losses or damage suffered as a result of pollution caused by spills or discharges of petroleum from petroleum facilities covered by any of Statoil's licences. This means that anyone within the state or the delineation of the NCS who suffers losses or damage as a result of pollution caused by operations in any of Statoil's NCS licence areas can claim compensation from Statoil without having to demonstrate that the damage is due to any fault on Statoil's part.

Furthermore, in countries where Statoil operates or expects to operate in the near future, new laws and regulations, the imposition of stricter requirements on licences, increasingly strict enforcement of or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, the aftermath of operational catastrophes in which Statoil or members of its industry are involved or the discovery of previously unknown contamination may require future expenditure in order to, among other things:

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015103


·modify operations

·install pollution control equipment

·implement additional safety measures

·perform site clean-ups

·curtail or cease certain operations

·temporarily shut down Statoil's facilities

·meet technical requirements

·increase monitoring, training, record-keeping and contingency planning and

·establish credentials in order to be permitted to commence drillingfacilities.

 

Compliance with laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate change and other environmental regulations could result in substantial capital expenditure, reduced profitability as a result of changes in operating costs, and adverse effects on revenue generation and strategic growth opportunities. Statoil regularly assesses how changes in regulations, including introduction ofHowever, more stringent climate policies, may impactchange regulations could also represent business opportunities for Statoil. For more information about climate change related legal and regulatory risks, see the oil price,risks described under the costs of developing new oil and gas assets,heading “The transition to a lower carbon economy, and the demand for oil and gas.physical effects of climate change, could impact Statoil’s business” in Risks related to our business in Risk Factors in this section 2.7 Corporate.

 

Statoil's operations in Norway are subject to emissions taxes as well as emissions allowances granted for Statoil's larger European operations under the EU Emissions Trading System. The agreed strengthening of the European Union's emission trading scheme may result in a significant reduction in the total emissions from relevant energy and industry installations which includes Statoil’s installations at the NCS. The price of the emissions allowances is also expected to increase significantly towards 2030. At the 21st Conference of Parties (COP21) in Paris in December 2015, 195 countries adopted a new universally applicable climate agreement, to be effective from 2020. The Norwegian Parliament decided that Norway should negotiate with the European Union to develop the terms for a collective delivery of 40% reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 1990. Individual countries’ climate plans, the so-called ‘Intended Nationally Determined Contributions’, are to be strengthened every five years. The implications for the industry are not yet clear, however requirements to reduce emissions could imply increased costs.

The EU Fuel Quality Directive 2009/30/EC and its Implementation Directive 2015/652/EU require fuel suppliers to reduce their carbon intensity for transportation fuels by 6% in 2020 compared to the baseline of 2010. Fuel suppliers can use biofuels, low carbon fuels (i.e. natural gas), charging of electric vehicles and upstream emission reductions to achieve the target. Member States may set penalties on fuels suppliers for not achieving the target. The EU Commission will submit a non-legislative guidance document before April 2017 which will propose common principles on verification and accounting of upstream emissions reductions. The regulation could indirectly impact Statoil if it results in incentives for service station companies to increase the share of biofuels on behalf of fossil fuels.

In the US, the Environmental Protection Agency has taken steps to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act authority by proposing a Clean Power Plan (CPP). The plan aims to reduce emissions from the US power sector by setting performance standards for power plants. The regulation, if approved, could stimulate increased gas demand. In 2015, the EPA also proposed new source performance standards, in addition to those issued in 2012, targeting volatile organic compound emissions, that are intended to further reduce oil and gas methane emissions. This could imply additional costs for oil and gas producers.

Statoil incorporates a cost for carbon in the assessment of all new projects. This guides Statoil's strategy and its investment decisions. For investment decisions pertaining to oil and gas projects in Norway, Statoil includes an internal cost of USD 64 per tonne of CO2-equivalent (based on the average annual exchange rate in 2015), based on the cost of the Norwegian CO2 tax. In 2014, Statoil began to apply an internal cost of USD 50 per tonne of CO2-equivalent in its investment decisions for all new oil and gas projects outside of Norway.

Many of Statoil's mature fields are producing increasing quantities of water with oil and gas. Statoil's ability to dispose of this water in environmentally acceptable ways may have an impact on its oil and gas production. Statoil's investments in North AmericanUS onshore producing assets will be subject to evolving regulations which are common to all energy companies with investments in this region. Thisthat could affect Statoil'sthese operations and profitabilitytheir profitability. In the United States, Federal agencies have taken steps to rescind, delay, or revise regulations seen as overly burdensome to the upstream oil and gas sector, including methane emission controls. Statoil supports Federal regulation of methane emissions and is operating in compliance with respectall current requirements. To the extent new or revised regulations impose additional compliance or data gathering requirements, Statoil could incur higher operating costs. Statoil has also joined voluntary emission reduction programs (One Future and API’s Environmental Partnership) and implemented a climate roadmap to these operations.reduce CO2 and methane emissions.

 

If Supervision, regulatory reviews, and financial reporting risks

Statoil does not succeedconducts business in overcoming the perceived trade-off between global access to energymany countries and the protection or improvement of the natural environment, Statoil could fail to live up to its aspirations of zero or minimal damage to the environmentproducts are marketed and of contributing to human progress.

traded worldwide.  Statoil is exposed to risk of supervision, review and sanctions for violations of regulatory laws and regulations at the supranational, national and nationallocal level. These include, among others, laws and regulations relating to financial reporting, taxation, bribery and corruption, securities and commodities trading, fraud, competition and antitrust, lawssafety and financialthe environment, and trading.  

Statoil's products are marketedlabour and traded worldwide and therefore subject to competition and antitrust laws at the supranational and national level in multiple jurisdictions.employment practices. Statoil is exposed to changes in those laws and regulations and to the outcome of any investigations from competitionconducted by regulatory and antitrust authorities, and violationssupervisory authorities.  Violations of the applicable laws and regulations may lead to legal liability, substantial fines. In December 2015, the European Commission announced that it currently will not pursue its investigation against Statoilfines and certain other oil and gas producers concerning alleged crude oil price manipulation. The investigation had been on-going since May 2013 when the EFTA Surveillance Authority conducted an unannounced inspection at Statoil's head office in Stavanger, Norway, on behalf of the European Commission. The authorities suspected participation by several companies, including Statoil, in anti-competitive practices and/or market manipulation related to Platts Market-On-Close price assessment process.sanctions for noncompliance.

 

Statoil is also exposed to financial review from financial supervisory authorities such as the Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Reviews performed by these authorities could result in changes to previous accountspreviously published financial statements and future accounting policies. On 10 March 2014, the FSA concluded a review of Statoil's 2012 financial statements. Statoil has accepted two of the FSA's conclusions following this review but has appealed the thirdpractices. In addition, failure in our external reporting to the Norwegian Ministry of Finance. report data accurately and in compliance with applicable standards could result in regulatory action, legal liability and damage to our reputation.

104Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

Statoil is listed on both the Oslo Børs and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and is registered with the SEC. Statoil is required to comply with the continuing obligations of these regulatory authorities, and violation of these obligations may result in legal liability, the imposition of fines orand other sanctions.

 

The Norwegian Petroleum Supervisor (Ptil)(PSA) supervises all aspects of Statoil's operations, from exploration drilling through development and operation, to cessation and removal. Its regulatory authority covers the whole NCS as well as petroleum-related plants on land in Norway. Statoil is exposed to supervision from Ptil,PSA, and as its business grows internationally other regulators, and such supervision could result in audit reports, orders and investigations.

The formation of a competitive internal gas market within the European Union (EU) and the general liberalisation of European gas markets could adversely affect Statoil's business.

The continuing liberalisation of EU gas markets following legislative instruments rolled out in 2011 and the implementation of these legislative instruments by member states, could create new business opportunities for Statoil, but could also affect Statoil's market position or result in a reduction in prices in Statoil's gas sales contracts. Statoil's exposure to hub gas prices has increased and correspondingly increased Statoil’s exposure to price volatility. Statoil continually monitors its contractual obligations and makes efforts to negotiate the most competitive pricing and other conditions available in the market. 

 

The EU-wide quantity of carbon allowances issued each year under the Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) for greenhouse gas emission allowances began to decrease in a linear manner in 2013. The ETS can have a positive or negative impact on Statoil, depending on the price of carbon, which will consequently have an impact on the development of gas-fired power generation in the EU. Until now, the carbon price has been too low to replace coal with gas fired generation capacity. This effect has been worsened by heavy subsidising of renewables which has caused gas fired power plants to shut down. Current EU climate and energy policies do not address this problem, but there is a tendency towards more market based subsidies in the new guidelines on environment and energy aid.

862Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

Failure to remediate a material weakness relating to operational effectiveness in our Internal Control over Financial Reporting could cause our internal control over financial reporting to be ineffective again in the future.

Management and external auditor have concluded that Statoil's internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017 was not effective due to the existence of a material weakness in our controls and procedures for the identification, assessment and timely and appropriate communication to the Board Audit Committee of questions or concerns (including allegations of misconduct) raised by employees in connection with termination of their employment relating to issues that could potentially have a material impact on our Consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting (otherwise than through Statoil’s external Ethics help line established by the Board Audit Committee). The allegations were subject to thorough investigations with external advisors, and no material misstatements were identified. There has been no effect on the 2017 Consolidated financial statements, or earlier periods, related to this matter.

Failure to remediate the material weakness could cause our internal control over financial reporting to be ineffective again in the future and could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and potentially impact our share price. See section 3.10 Controls and procedures.

Political and economic policies of the Norwegian State risks

Political and economic policies of the Norwegian State could affect Statoil’s business.business

The Norwegian State plays an active role in the management of NCS hydrocarbon resources. In addition to its direct participation in petroleum activities through the State's direct financial interest (SDFI) and its indirect impact through legislation, such as tax and environmental laws and regulations, the Norwegian State, among other things, awards licences for exploration, production and transportation, approves exploration and development projects and applications for production rates for individual fields and may, if important public interests are at stake, also instruct Statoil and other oil companies to reduce petroleum production. Furthermore, in the production licences in which the SDFI holds an interest, the Norwegian State has the power to direct petroleum licences' actions in certain circumstances.

 

If the Norwegian State were to take additional action under its activities on the NCS or to change laws, regulations, policies or practices relating to the oil and gas industry, Statoil's NCS exploration, development and production activities and the results of its operations could be affected.

 

5.1.3 Risks related to state ownership

This section discusses some of the potential risks relating to Statoil’s business that could derive from the Norwegian State's majority ownership and from Statoil’s involvement in the SDFI.

 

Statoil’s shareholder alignment risks

The interests of Statoil’s majority shareholder, the Norwegian State, may not always be aligned with the interests of Statoil’s other shareholders, and this may affect Statoil’s decisions relating to the NCS.NCS

The Norwegian Parliament, known as the Storting, and the Norwegian State have resolved that the Norwegian State's shares in Statoil and the SDFI's interest in NCS licences must be managed in accordance with a coordinated ownership strategy for the Norwegian State's oil and gas interests. Under this strategy, the Norwegian State has required Statoil to continue to market the Norwegian State's oil and gas together with Statoil's own oil and gas as a single economic unit.

 

Pursuant to this coordinated ownership strategy, the Norwegian State requires Statoil, in its activities on the NCS, to take account of the Norwegian State's interests in all decisions that may affect the development and marketing of Statoil's own and the Norwegian State's oil and gas.

 

The Norwegian State directly held 67% of Statoil's ordinary shares as of 31 December 2015.2017. Based on the Norwegian Public Limited Companies Act, the Norwegian State effectively has the power to influence the outcome of any vote of shareholders due to the percentage of Statoil's shares it owns, including amending its articles of association and electing all non-employee members of the corporate assembly. The employees are entitled to be represented by up to one-third of the members of the board of directors and one-thirdone third of the corporate assembly.

 

The corporate assembly is responsible for electing Statoil's board of directors. It also makes recommendations to the general meeting concerning the board of directors' proposals relating to the company's annual accounts, balance sheet, allocation of profit and coverage of loss. The interests of the Norwegian State in deciding these and other matters and the factors it considers when casting its votes, especially under the coordinated ownership strategy for the SDFI and Statoil's shares held by the Norwegian State, could be different from the interests of Statoil's other shareholders.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015105


If the Norwegian State's coordinated ownership strategy is not implemented and pursued in the future, then Statoil's mandate to continue to sell the Norwegian State's oil and gas together with its own oil and gas as a single economic unit is likely to be prejudiced. Loss of the mandate to sell the SDFI's oil and gas could have an adverse effect on Statoil's position in the markets in which it operates.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201787


For further information about the mandate to sell the Norwegian State's oil and gas, see section 3.12.4 SDFI oil and gas marketing and sale.sale in section 2.7 Corporate.

 

106Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


5.2 Risk management

Statoil’s overall risk management includes identifying, evaluating and managing risk in all its activities to ensure safe operations and to achieve Statoil’s corporate goals.

Statoil bases its risk management on an enterprise risk management (ERM) approach in order to achieve optimal corporate solutions. This includes identifying, evaluating and managing risk in all its activities. In order to achieve optimal corporate solutions, Statoil bases its risk management on an enterprise-wide risk management approach.

Statoil defines riskRisk is defined as a deviation from a specified reference value and the uncertainty associated with it. A positive deviation is defined as an upside risk, while a negative deviation is a downside risk. The reference value is most commonly a forecast, percentile or target. Statoil has an enterprise risk management (ERM) approach, which means that:

In Statoil’s ERM approach:

·          focus is on the value impact for Statoil

·          risk is managed to make sure that Statoil’s operations are safe and in compliance with Statoils’Statoil’s requirements and

focus is on risk and reward at all levels in the organisation

Statoil’s corporate risk committee (CRC) is headed by the chief financial officer and its members include representatives of the principal business areas. It is an enterprise risk management advisory body that primarily advises the chief financial officer, but also the business areas' management on specific issues. The CRC assesses and advises on measures aimed at managing the overall risk to the group, and it proposes appropriate measures to adjust risk at the corporate level. The CRC is also responsible for reviewing and developing Statoil’s risk policies. The committee meets regularly during the year to support Statoil’s risk management strategies, including hedging and trading strategies, as well as risk management methodologies. It regularly receives risk information that is relevant to it from Statoil’s corporate risk department.

 

Risk is managed in the business line and is an integratedintegral part of any manager’s responsibility. However, to ensure optimal corporate solutions, some risks are managed at corporate level to avoid sub-optimisation.level. This includes oil and natural gas price risks, interest and currency risks, risk dimension in the strategy work, prioritisation processes and capital structure discussions.

 

Statoil’s corporate risk committee, which is headed by the chief financial officer and includes representatives from the principal business segments, is responsible for defining, developing and reviewing Statoil's risk policies and methodology. The following section describes in some detailchief financial officer, assisted by the market riskscommittee, is also responsible for overseeing and developing Statoil's Enterprise Risk Management and proposing appropriate measures to which Statoil is exposed and how Statoil manages these risks.adjust risk at the corporate level.

 

5.2.1

Managing operational risk

Statoil manages risk in order to ensure safe operations and to achieve its corporate goals in compliance with its requirements.requirements

·All risks are related to activities in Statoil's value chain, which denotes the value that is added in each step - from access, maturing, project execution and operation to market. In addition to the economic impact these risks could have on Statoil's cash flows, Statoil has have a strong focus on avoiding HSE and integrity-related incidents (such as accidents, fraud and corruption). Most of the risks are managed by the principal business area line managers. Some operational risks are insurable and insured by Statoil’s captive insurance company operating in the Norwegian and international insurance markets.markets

·Statoil’s risk management process is based on ISO31000 Risk management – principles and guidelines. The process provides a standardised framework and methodology for assessing and managing risk. A standardisation of the process across the entire enterpriseStatoil ASA and its subsidiaries allows for comparable risk levels and efficiency in decisions and it enables the organisation to create sustainable value while avoidingseeking to avoid incidents. The process ensuresseeks to ensure that risks are identified, analysed, evaluated and managed. Risk adjusting actions are subject to a cost benefit evaluation (except certain safety related risks which arecould be subject to specific regulations).

 

5.2.2 Managing financial risk

The following section describes how Statoil manages the market risks to which it is exposed.

The results of

Statoil's business activities expose the group to financial risk. Using a holistic approach, correlations between the most important market risks and the natural hedges inherent in Statoil’s operations depend on aportfolio are taken into account. This approach allows Statoil to reduce the number of factors, most significantly those that affectrisk management transactions and avoid sub-optimisation.

Statoil's activities expose the company to financial risks such as market risks (including commodity price it receives forrisk, interest rate risk and currency risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. For a discussion of financial risk management see note 5 Financial risk management in the products.Consolidated financial statements.

 

Statoil has developed policies aimed at managing the financial volatility inherent in some of the business exposures. In accordance with these policies, Statoil enters into various financial and commodity-based transactions (derivatives). While the policies and mandates are set at the company level, theThe business areas are responsible for marketing and trading commodities are also responsible for managing commodity-based price risks.risks within mandates. Interest, liquidity, liability and credit risks are managed by the company's central finance department. All major strategic transactions are required to be coordinated at corporate level.

  

The main factors that influence theinfluencing Statoil’s operational and financial results of Statoil’s operations include:include: the level of crude oil and natural gas prices, trends in the exchange raterates between mainly the USD, in which the trading price of crude oil is generally stated, EUR, GBP and GBP where Statoil has a large share of its natural gas sales, and NOK, in which its accounts are reported and a substantial proportion of the costs are incurred;NOK; Statoil’s oil and natural gas production volumes, which in turn depend on entitlement volumes under PSAs and available petroleum reserves, and Statoil’s own, as well as

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015107


partners' expertise and cooperation in recovering oil and natural gas from those reserves; and changes in Statoil’s portfolio of assets due to acquisitions and disposals.

 

882Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil’s operational and financial results will also be affected by trends in the international oil industry, including possible actions by governments and other regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which Statoil operates, or possible or continued actions by members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec)(OPEC) and/or other producing nations that affect price levels and volumes, refining margins, the cost of oilfield services, supplies and equipment, competition for exploration opportunities and operatorships, and deregulation of the natural gas markets, all of which may cause substantial changes to existing market structures and to the overall level and volatility of prices and price differentials.

 

The following table shows the yearly averages for quoted Brent Blend crude oil prices, natural gas average sales prices, refining reference margins and the USDNOKUSD/NOK exchange rates for 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013. 2015. 

 

Yearly average

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Crude oil (USD/bbl Brent blend)

55.3

98.9

108.7

Average invoiced gas prices - Europe (NOK/scm)

2.16

2.28

2.45

Refining reference margin (USD/bbl)

8.0

4.7

4.1

USDNOK average daily exchange rate

8.07

6.30

5.88

Yearly average

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Average Brent oil price (USD/bbl)

54.2

43.7

52.4

Average invoiced gas prices - Europe (USD/mmBtu)

5.6

5.2

7.1

Refining reference margin (USD/bbl)

6.3

4.8

8.0

USD/NOK average daily exchange rate

8.3

8.4

8.1

 

 

 

 


The illustration shows the indicative full-year effect on the financial result for 20162018 given certain changes in the crude oil price, natural gas contract prices and the USD/NOK exchange rate. The estimated price sensitivity of Statoil’s financial results to each of the factors has been estimated based on the assumption that all other factors remain unchanged. The estimated indicative effects of the negative changes in these factors are not expected to be materially asymmetric to the effects shown in the illustration. 

 

Significant downward adjustments of Statoil’s commodity price assumptions willcould result in impairment lossesimpairments on certain producing and development assets in the portfolio. Subsequent to year end 2015, commodity prices have continued to be volatile. See note 1110 Property, plant and equipment and note 12 Intangible assets to the Consolidated financial statements for sensitivity analysis related to impairment losses.impairments.

Statoil assesses oil and gas price hedging opportunities on a regular basis as a tool with regard to increase financial robustness and strengthen flexibility.

 

Fluctuating foreign exchange rates can also have a significant impact on the operating results. Statoil’s revenues and cash flows are mainly denominated in or driven by USD, while a large portion of the operating expenses, capital expenditures and income taxes payable accrue in NOK. Statoil seeks to manage this currency mismatch by issuing or swapping non-current financial debt in USD. This long-term funding policy is an integrated part of our total risk management programme. Statoil also engages in foreign currency management in order to cover the non-USD needs, which are primarily in NOK. In general, an increase in the value of USD in relation to NOK can be expected to increase Statoil’s reported earnings.

 


Historically, Statoil’s revenues have largely been generated by the production of oil and natural gas on the NCS. Norway imposes a 78% marginal tax rate on income from offshore oil and natural gas activities (a symmetrical tax system). For morefurther information, see section 3.12.62.7 Corporate under Taxation of Statoil.

 

Statoil’s earnings volatility is moderated as a result of the significant proportion of its Norwegian offshore income that is subject to a 78% tax rate in profitable periods, and the significant tax assets generated by its Norwegian offshore operations in any loss-making periods. MostThe basis for taxation is 3% of the taxes Statoil pays are paiddividend received, which is subject to the Norwegian State. Dividends receivedstandard income tax rate (reduced from 24% in Norway are 97% exempt from tax, with the remaining 3% taxed at the ordinary rate of 27%. For dividends received from companies2017 to 23% in a low-tax jurisdiction within the European Economic Area (EEA), the 97% exemption only applies if real business activities are conducted in that jurisdiction.2018). Dividends received from Norwegian companies and from similar companies resident in non-EEA countries are 97% exempt if the NorwegianEEA for tax purposes, in which the recipient has held at least 10%holds more than 90% of the shares for a minimum of two years and votes, are fully exempt from tax. Dividends from companies resident in the foreign country isEEA that are not asimilar to Norwegian companies, companies in low-tax jurisdiction.

Government fiscal policy is an issuecountries and portfolio investments outside the EEA will, under certain circumstances, be subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 24% in several of the countries2017 to 23% in which Statoil operates, such as, but not limited to, Algeria, Angola, Nigeria, Brazil, the USA and Venezuela. However, Statoil’s exposure in Venezuela is low. For instance, government fiscal policy could require royalties in cash or in kind, increased tax rates, increased government participation and changes in terms and conditions as defined in various production or income-sharing contracts. Statoil’s financial statements are2018) based on currently enacted regulations and on any current claims from tax authorities regarding past events. Developments in government fiscal policy may have a negative effect on future net income.

Financial risk management

Statoil's business activities naturally expose the group to financial risk. The group's approach to risk management includes identifying, evaluating and managing risk in all activities using a top-down approach for the purpose of avoiding sub-optimisation and utilising correlations observed from a group perspective. Summing up the different market risks without including the correlations will overestimate Statoil’s total

108Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


market risk. For this reason, Statoil utilises correlations between all of the most important market risks, such as oil and natural gas prices, product prices, currencies and interest rates, to calculate the overall market risk and thereby utilise the natural hedges embedded in its portfolio. This approach also reduces the number of unnecessary transactions, which reduces transaction costs and avoids sub-optimisation.

In order to achieve the above effects, Statoil has centralised trading mandates (financial positions taken to achieve financial gains, in addition to established policies) so that all major/strategic transactions are coordinated through the CRC. Local trading mandates are therefore relatively small.

Statoil's activities expose the company to the following financial risks: market risks (including commodity price risk, interest rate risk and currency risk), liquidity risk and credit risk. For a discussion of financial risk management see note 5 Financial risk management in the Consolidated financial statements.full amounts received.

 

5.2.3 Disclosures about market risk

Statoil uses financial instruments to manage commodity price risks, interest rate risks, currency risks and liquidity risks. Significant amounts of assets and liabilities are accounted for as financial instruments.

 

See note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk in the Consolidated financial statements, for details of the nature and extent of such positions, and for qualitative and quantitative disclosures of the risks associated with these instruments.

5.3 Legal proceedings

Statoil is involved in a number of proceedings globally concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its business.

Statoil is currently not aware of any regulatory, judicial or arbitration proceedings or claims that it believes may have, or have had in the recent past, individually or in the aggregate, significant effects on Statoil’s financial position or profitability or on the results of its operations or liquidity. This includes the legal proceedings described hereafter:

Agbami redetermination, Nigeria:

Through its ownership in OML 128 in Nigeria, Statoil is party to an ownership interest redetermination process for the Agbami field. In October 2015 Statoil received the expert’s final ruling which implies a reduction of 5.17 percentage points in Statoil’s equity interest in the field from 20.21% to 15.04%. In 2013, Statoil initiated arbitration proceedings to set aside interim decisions made by the expert in the redetermination process, but this was declined by the arbitration tribunal in its November 2015 judgment. Statoil has initiated proceedings before the Federal High Court in Lagos to set aside the arbitration award, and also intends to initiate a new arbitration to set aside the expert’s final ruling.

As of 31 December 2015 Statoil has made a provision of NOK 9.5 billion, net of tax, which reflects a reduction of 5.17 percentage points in Statoil’s equity interest in the Agbami field.

Royalty Litigation, US Onshore:

Statoil is currently defending multiple, but individually immaterial, royalty litigations and arbitrations, some on behalf of large classes of mineral owners, relating to its operated and non-operated positions in the Marcellus and Eagle Ford shale plays. Mineral owners in these proceedings generally allege that Statoil has breached their oil and gas leases by first paying royalty on the basis of an impermissibly-low unit price, and second taking prohibited and/or excessive deductions for post-production costs. The cases are in various procedural stages and are typical disputes for oil companies in the US onshore business. None of the litigations or arbitrations is currently set for trial or final hearing.     

In the ordinary course of business, companies in the Statoil group are subject to a number of other loss contingencies arising from litigation and claims raised by governmental and private parties, for instance contractors, tax authorities, land owners for on-shore activities and buyers of Statoil’s products.

See also note 9 Income taxes and note 23 Other commitments and contingencies in Consolidated financial statements.

 

902Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


2.12 SAFETY, SECURITY AND SUSTAINABILITY

Safety and security

Safety and security risks are particularly relevant for the oil and gas industry, because our core activities involve the risk of accidents and incidents. We work with flammable hydrocarbons at high pressure, often in harsh offshore environments and at height or depths. Oil spills are a major risk we need to handle in both our offshore and onshore oil and gas operations. To this end we have established a global oil spill response system, which includes close collaboration with industry peers and national and local communities.

We focus on identifying safety and security risks and having in place procedures and work processes to control them. Our ambition is to be an industry leader in ensuring safe and secure operations that protect our people, the environment, the communities we work with and our assets.

Our total serious incident frequency (SIF), including both actual and potential incidents, was 0.6 incidents per million hours worked, a decrease compared to 0.8 in 2016. We had no serious incidents with major accident potential in 2017.

Total recordable injuries per million hours worked (TRIF) was 2.8 in 2017, compared to 2.7[6] in 2016.


In 2017, the total number of serious oil and gas leakages (with a leakage rate above 0.1 kg per second) was 16, down from 18 in 2016. None of the serious oil and gas leakages ignited. We experienced a 50% reduction (i.e. from 6 to 3) in the number oil and gas leakages in our onshore operations in Norway and Denmark compared to 2016. The number outside of Norway and Denmark remained at a similar level in 2017 as for 2016.

For the period 2012 to 2016 our performance showed a reduction in the number of oil spills per year.  For 2017 the number of oil spills increased to 206 compared to 146 in 2016. The main contributor to this increase was our onshore activities in the US. Three initiatives have been mounted to reduce the number of leaks and spills: a programme to proactively identify and prevent leaks and spills; enhanced control of technical integrity before start-up/restart at facilities; and strengthening of suppliers’ commitment through training and follow-up.

The total volume of oil spills decreased from 61 m³ in 2016 to 34 m³ in 2017. The largest spill was an 8 m³ leak of gasoil from a pressure relief valve at the Kalundborg refinery in Denmark of which 5 m³ were collected by secondary barriers.

Security is an important consideration for the energy industry and we assess security threats and risks on a continuous basis to achieve effective and proportionate security risk management. We had no serious security incidents in 2017.

In 2017, we launched the “I am Safety” programme to further strengthen safety and security performance. The focus is on strengthening personal commitment by increasing engagement, visibility and awareness of individually relevant safety and security factors.

Health and work environment

Statoil is committed to providing a healthy working environment for its employees. Systematic efforts are made to design and improve working conditions in order to prevent occupational injuries, work-related illness and sickness absence, due to both physical and psychosocial risk factors.


[6] The TRIF for 2016 has been restated due to misreporting of man hours worked.  It was previously reported as 2.9


The most significant risk factors related to the work environment are noise, ergonomics, chemical risk as well as psychosocial conditions.

The sickness absence rate for Statoil ASA employees increased slightly from 4.3% in 2016 to 4.6% in 2017.

Climate change

Statoil supports the ambition set by the Paris Climate Agreement of December 2015 to limit the average global temperature rise to well below two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels by 2100.

The transition towards a lower carbon economy is underway. During 2017, Statoil embedded our response to climate change into our sharpened business strategy. Statoil aims to develop a high value, lower carbon portfolio that will be robust to future fluctuations in energy prices and potentially higher carbon costs.

Statoil’s Climate roadmap, launched in March 2017, explains how Statoil expects to deliver on the strategic ambition to create a low carbon advantage and develop the business by 2030 in support of the ambitions in the Paris climate agreement and of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7 (Ensure access to affordable, reliable sustainable energy for all) and 13 (Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts).

To implement the Climate roadmap, Statoil focuses on three broad areas:

§realising a lower carbon oil and gas portfolio

§building an industrial position in new energy

§stress testing and transparent reporting

Statoil applies an internal carbon price of minimum USD 50 per tonne carbon dioxide equivalents from 2020 to all potential projects and investments. In countries where the actual carbon price is higher than USD 50 (e.g. in Norway), Statoil uses the actual price and predicted future carbon price in the investment analysis.

During 2017, climate principles were further embedded into the decision-making process by including a corporate-wide requirement for the assessment of the carbon intensity and emission reduction opportunities for all potential projects and investments.

The work to reduce CO2 emissions and emission intensity from Statoil-operated assets continued, and a plan of action for international partner operated activities was initiated.

Statoil aims to achieve, by 2030, annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reductions of 3 million tonnes compared to emission levels at the start of 2017[7] through continued energy efficiency measures and use of low carbon energy sources.

2017 performance

Statoil’s upstream CO2 intensity improved from 10kg/boe in 2016 to 9kg/boe in 2017, mainly due to our exit from our activity in the Canadian oils sands and increased export of gas from the electrified Troll field. Total CO2 emissions increased slightly from 14.8 million tonnes in 2016 to 14.9 million tonnes in 2017.  



[7] Statoil is aiming to achieve, by 2030, annual CO2 emissions that are 3 million tonnes less than they would have been, had no reduction measures been implemented between 2017 and 2030.

922Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Direct greenhouse gas emissions (so called Scope 1 emissions) remained at the same level in 2017 as for 2016, at 15.4 million tonnes CO2 equivalents. Greenhouse gas emissions include carbon CO2 and methane (CH4), where CO2 constitutes the largest part. Methane (CH4) emissions decreased from 24.2 thousand tonnes in 2016 to 22.2 thousand tonnes in 2017.

Several CO2 emission reduction initiatives were implemented in 2017, amounting to a total of around 360,000 tonnes of CO2. The largest contributor was energy efficiency measurements at Hammerfest LNG.

Growth opportunities for Statoil within renewables and new energy solutions include both commercial investments and research and development (R&D). Statoil is engaged in offshore wind projects, carbon capture and storage, solar and hydrogen projects. Statoil’s capital expenditure in new energy solutions during 2017 was in line with our ambition. In 2017 approximately 18% of Statoil’s expenditure on R&D efforts addressed energy efficiency, carbon capture and renewables.

Climate-related risk and disclosure: The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures

The Climate roadmap serves to enhance our disclosure on climate-related business risks, in line with the recommendations put forward by the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), which is supported by Statoil. In 2017, we joined the TCFD Preparer Forum for oil and gas companies to engage with the Task Force on efficient and feasible ways to implement the TCFD recommendation for disclosure.

Executing the company’s climate ambition is a line responsibility. However, the Corporate Sustainability Unit is responsible for monitoring progress on the Climate roadmap and reporting on sustainability and climate risk issues and performance at group level, to the corporate executive committee and the board of directors.

Statoil regularly assesses climate-related business risk, whether political, regulatory, market, physical or related to reputation, as part of the enterprise risk management process. This includes assessment of both upsides and downsides. Statoil uses tools such as internal carbon pricing, scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis of the project portfolio against various oil and gas price assumptions. We monitor technology developments and changes in regulation and assess how these might impact the oil and gas price, the cost of developing new assets and the demand for oil and gas and opportunities in renewable energy and low carbon solutions.

A detailed overview of climate-related risk factors, and the results of stress testing our portfolio against the International Energy Agency (IEA) scenarios, are provided in section 2.11 Risk review under Risk Factors in this report.

On a regular basis, the corporate executive committee and board of directors review and monitor climate change-related business risks and opportunities. In 2017, the board discussed climate-related issues in four out of eight meetings (including one risk update), and the safety, sustainability and ethics committee discussed climate-related issues in all of the five committee meetings held.

Stakeholder engagement and collaboration

Climate change is complex and requires global and cross sector cooperation. We are committed to working with our suppliers, customers, governments and peers to find innovative and commercially viable ways to reduce emissions across the oil and gas value chain. We are members of the CEO-led Oil and Gas Climate Initiative. Through our participation in the government-led Climate and Clean Air Coalition’s Oil and Gas Methane Partnership we continued our efforts to systematically address methane emissions and report on annual progress.

We work with governments and other organisations to support climate and energy policies that encourage fuel switching from coal to gas, growth in renewables, the deployment of carbon capture usage and storage and other low carbon solutions, and efficient production, distribution and use of energy globally. We have also teamed up with global peers through OGCI to help shape the industry’s climate response.

Through the World Bank led Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition and our membership of the International Emission Trading Association we continued our advocacy for a price on carbon during 2017. And through our membership in the OGCI and World Business Council for Sustainable Development we expressed our continued support for the ambitions of the Paris climate agreement. Statoil is an endorser of the World Bank Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership and we have made a commitment to contribute to stopping routine flaring by 2030 through the World Bank Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 initiative.

Environmental impact and resource efficiency

Statoil is committed to using resources efficiently and responsible management of waste, emissions to air and impacts on ecosystems. This reduces the impact on the local environment and can also save costs.

Responsible water management is important for Statoil. Total fresh water withdrawal increased from 13.5 million cubic metres in 2016 to 14.8 million cubic metres in 2017. The main contributor to this increase was the higher number of wells fracked, relative to 2016, in our US onshore shale and tight oil assets. We work actively to improve water efficiency in our onshore activities in North America, through means such as water recycling and substituting fresh water with brackish water.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    10993


Nitrogen oxide emissions were 40 thousand tonnes in 2017, up from 39 thousand tonnes in 2016. The increased drilling and well stimulation activity was the main contributor to this increase. Sulphur oxide emissions were 1.7 thousand tonnes, down from 1.8 thousand tonnes in 2016. The main contributor to this reduction was the exit, during 2017, from our Canadian oil sands projects activities. Total emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds remained at the same level in 2017 as in 2016, at 49 thousand tonnes.

Statoil is concerned with valuing and protecting biodiversity and ecosystems and follows precautionary principles to minimise potential negative effects of the company’s activities. Statoil supports research programmes to increase knowledge about ecosystems and biodiversity and collaborates with industry peers to share knowledge and develop tools for biodiversity management. In addition, Statoil works with our suppliers to minimise invasive aquatic species and reduce risks pertaining to accidental spills related to shipping transportation.

During 2017 we saw a 32% reduction in the volume of hazardous waste generated, from 438 thousand tonnes in 2016 to 296 thousand tonnes in 2017. The main contributor to this volume decrease was less drilling and well start-up activities, on the Norwegian continental shelf, at locations without treatment facilities for oil contaminated water. As such less untreated oil contaminated water was sent to shore for treatment.  The hazardous waste recovery rate was slightly lower in 2017, at 83% compared to 84% in 2016.

For our US onshore operations in 2017, 105 thousand tonnes of drill cuttings and solid waste were sent to landfill, and around 4.7 million cubic meters of produced and flow back water was directed to deep well disposal. These waste types are exempt from US hazardous waste regulations.

In 2017 the volume of non-hazardous waste generated for all Statoil operated assets was 34 thousand tonnes, compared to 50 tonnes in 2016. The recovery rate was 71% in 2017 compared to 56% in 2016. The decrease in the volume generated and the increase in the recovery rate is mainly attributed to the divestment of our oil sands projects in Canada.

Regular discharges of oil to water were 1.2 thousand tonnes in 2017, compared to 1.4 in 2016. This reduction is attributed to a combination of turnaround activity during 2017, reducing production levels, and operational measures at several assets that have reduced the volume of produced water discharged to sea, and reduced the oil in water content of the discharged water.

Working with suppliers

Statoil is committed to using suppliers who operate in accordance with Statoil’s values and who maintain high standards of safety, security and sustainability. These aspects are incorporated in all phases of the procurement process. Potential suppliers must meet Statoil’s minimum requirements to qualify as a supplier, including those related to safety, security and sustainability.

Statoil expect our suppliers to comply with applicable laws, respect internationally recognised human rights and adhere to ethical standards which are consistent with our ethical requirements, when working for Statoil. During 2017 a new compliance annex, covering human rights and anti-corruption standards for suppliers, was introduced for use in new contracts.  Potential suppliers for contracts valued at more than USD 800 thousand are, in addition, required to sign Statoil’s Supplier Declaration, which establishes minimum requirements for ethics, anti-corruption, environment, health, safety, respect for human rights, and for further promoting these requirements among their own suppliers. Potential suppliers are also screened for integrity risk, in accordance with our procedures for integrity due diligence.

Human rights

Statoil seeks to conduct its business in a way that is consistent with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (the UN Guiding Principles), the ten UN Global Compact principles and the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights. Statoil is committed to respecting internationally recognised human rights as laid out in the International Bill of Human Rights, the International Labour Organization's 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work, and applicable standards of international humanitarian law.

Labour rights and working conditions for our workforce and suppliers, human rights of individuals in communities and human rights in security arrangements are the three broad focus areas for human rights for Statoil’s activities.

Human rights aspects are integrated into relevant internal management processes, tools and training. On-going activities, business relationships and new business opportunities are assessed for potential human rights impacts and aspects, following a risk-based approach.

During 2017, Statoil continued to focus on strengthening our health and safety performance. Statoil also continued efforts to strengthen the diversity of its workforce, taking into account gender, nationality, background, ethnicity, competence, age and preferences. Work also continued on the strengthening of Statoil’s centralised governance of remuneration and benefits to ensure they are both fair and attractive.

In 2017, Statoil continued the strengthening of its processes for managing human rights in our supply chain and on raising awareness through training. We conducted 41 verifications across 16 countries in 2017. Over 260 employees attended classroom training on human rights in the supply chain.  A compliance appendix, covering human rights and anti-corruption standards for suppliers, was introduced for use in new contracts.  Work was started on supporting guidance that will be introduced in 2018.

In 2017, Statoil’s Human Rights Steering Committee (HRSC), responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of Statoil’s human rights policy, closely followed the ongoing implementation efforts and provided guidance on human rights related reporting requirements.

942Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil recognises that a company-wide commitment to respect human rights requires continuous training and awareness raising in order to embed good practices throughout the organisation.  Over 500 staff and consultants registered for the human rights e-learning awareness training during 2017.  Other training initiatives, during 2017, included human rights focus sessions on the agenda of various management meetings, reaching a total of 42 leaders across the company. Statoil also started the development, during 2017, of a human rights training course to be used company-wide, that can be tailored for use with specific target groups.

The context of Statoil’s operations requires that security services are engaged to safeguard Statoil’s people and property. Particular focus is needed to ensure respect for human rights in security arrangements, in jurisdictions where security services are not well regulated or security personnel are not adequately trained. Statoil follows international standards of good practices in security and human rights. Statoil’s commitment to the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights is reflected in policies and procedures for risk assessment, deployment, training and follow-up of private and public security providers.

Transparency, ethics and anti-corruption

Transparency is a cornerstone of good governance. It is embodied in our corporate values. Transparency allows business to prosper in a predictable and competitive environment and enables society to hold governments and businesses accountable. Statoil supports and promotes effective, transparent and accountable management of wealth derived from the extractives industries.

Statoil supports and engages in global transparency initiatives through its membership in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), the United Nations Global Compact Anti-Corruption Working Group and the World Economic Forum’s Partnering Against Corruption Initiative (PACI), and supports Transparency International Norway. In 2017 Statoil actively participated in the Norwegian national EITI multi-stakeholder group and on the international EITI board through its board member. Statoil also engaged with local and national organisations in other EITI implementing countries, and provided USD 60,000 in financial support to the international EITI. Statoil also participated in a multi-stakeholder working group organised by Transparency International in preparation of the report Ten Anti-corruption principles for state-owned enterprises, published in November 2017.

Statoil believes that doing business in an ethical and transparent manner is a prerequisite for sustainable business. Statoil has a zero-tolerance policy towards all forms of corruption. This policy is embedded across the company through Statoil’s values, the Code of Conduct and the Anti-corruption compliance programme. The Code of Conduct (the Code) prohibits all forms of corruption and bribery, including facilitation payments.

The Code reflects Statoil’s values and its commitment to high ethical standards in business activities. It describes the company’s requirements in areas such as anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, fair competition, human rights and a non-discriminatory working environment with equal opportunities. It applies to all Statoil employees, board members, hired personnel and those performing services for or on behalf of Statoil.

Statoil seeks to work with others who share the company’s commitment to business integrity and who have codes of conduct consistent with the Code. Before entering into a new business relationship, or extending an existing one, the relationship has to satisfy Statoil’s integrity due diligence requirements. Statoil’s due diligence vetting process is risk-based, allowing us to dedicate resources where we see potential concerns. In joint ventures and business partnerships that are not controlled by Statoil, Statoil encourages the adoption of ethics and anti-corruption policies, procedures and controls that are consistent with Statoil’s own standards.

All Statoil employees have to confirm annually that they understand and will comply with the Code. The purpose of such confirmation is to remind each individual employee about the duty to comply with Statoil’s values and ethical requirements. Failure to comply with the Code may be met with disciplinary measures, including termination of the contractual relationship with Statoil.

Statoil’s Anti-Corruption Compliance Programme summarises the standards, requirements and procedures implemented to comply with applicable laws and regulations and to uphold our high standard of doing business ethically. A global network of compliance officers is integrated into our business activities to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to ethics and anti-corruption in Statoil’s business activities, regardless of where they take place.

We expect and encourage anyone who becomes aware of a possible violation of the Code, Statoil policies or applicable law, to report their concerns in a prompt and responsible manner. Indeed, concerns can be reported through internal channels or through the publicly available Ethics Helpline, which allows for anonymous reporting. The number and types of cases from the helpline is reported quarterly to the board of directors. In 2017, we received 107 cases through the Ethics Helpline, compared to 51 in 2016.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 201795


 

6 Shareholder information2.13 OUR PEOPLE

In Statoil we work together to shape the future of energy in a partnership between the organisation and the individual. We all apply our skills and personal commitment to help Statoil towards achieving our vision.

 

Statoil aims to offer challenging and meaningful job opportunities that attract and retain the right people. Through our engagement, creativity and collaboration, we aim to build a better Statoil for tomorrow. We are committed to creating a caring and collaborative working environment, promoting diversity, inclusion and equal opportunities for all employees.

Empowered people are a key enabler for realising Statoil’s sharpened strategy.  In 2017, we started to implement our new people and leadership strategy designed to ensure we have the right skills and capabilities in place going forward. The foundation for the strategy’s guiding principles is our commitment to safety supported by our people processes; a consistent presence in talent markets; a company culture which embraces digitalisation; building flexibility within the largestworkforce and growing diversity.

In 2017, we enhanced our performance management approach to further develop a performance development culture at Statoil. Our main goal is to build a stronger culture of continuous feedback, coaching and development. Instead of focusing on backward looking annual ratings, we are focused on continuous real-time feedback, strength based development and reward and talent outcomes based on multiple inputs. People@Statoil is our common process for people development, deployment, performance, and reward. It is an integrated part of performance development and applies to all employees.

Learning and development is at the core of Statoil. We encourage our employees to take responsibility for their own learning and development, continuously build new skills and share knowledge. Our focus on people development has continued throughout 2017 and the activity level has been closely monitored in our people development key performance indicator (KPI) at both corporate and business area levels. This KPI sets the ambition level for both our corporate university and internal job market.

Our corporate university is our platform for learning. It enables the company listedto build the capabilities needed to deliver on its strategy, continuously improve, and take the Oslo Børs, where it trades underlead in developing leadership and technology. Recognising that digitalisation and automation will transform the ticker code STL. Statoilway we work in the coming years we established a new digital academy, in our corporate university, to build digital skills across the organisation. In addition, our platform for learning and content delivery has been upgraded with the implementation of a new learning management system, supporting our ambition of making engaging and virtual learning available for all. The average training days for employees in 2017 increased to 3.9 (from 3.2 in 2016) for formal learning. Our ambition is also listed onto increase the New York Stock Exchange underlearning activity level further to support the ticker code STO.development of our people.

 

STATOIL SHARE

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareprice STL (low) (NOK)

116.30

120.00

147.70

162.40

160.50

Shareprice STL (average) (NOK)

137.59

166.41

123.00

133.80

113.70

Shareprice STL (high) (NOK)

160.80

194.80

136.72

146.97

139.60

Shareprice STL (year-end) (NOK)

123.70

131.20

147.00

139.00

153.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market value year-end (NOK billion)

394

418

468

443

490

Daily turnover (million shares)

5.1

3.7

3.0

4.3

8.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary earnings per share (EPS) (NOK)

-11.80

6.87

12.50

21.60

24.70

P/E1)

-10.48

19.10

11.76

6.44

6.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary dividend per share (NOK)2)

1.80

7.20

7.00

6.75

6.50

Ordinary dividend per share (USD)2)

0.6603

 

 

 

 

Growth in ordinary dividend per share3)

NA

2.9%

3.7%

3.8%

4.0%

Dividend per share (NOK)4)

7.62

7.20

7.00

6.75

6.50

Dividend per share (USD)4)

 0.86  

 0.97  

 1.15  

 1.21  

 1.08  

Pay-out ratio5)

-65%

105%

56%

31%

26%

Dividend yield6)

6.2%

5.5%

4.8%

4.9%

4.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary shares outstanding, weighted average

 3,179,442,977  

 3,179,958,780  

 3,180,683,828  

 3,181,546,060  

 3,182,112,843  

Ordinary shares outstanding, year-end

 3,188,647,103  

 3,188,647,103  

 3,188,647,103  

 3,188,647,103  

 3,188,647,103  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Share price at year end divided by EPS.

2)

Proposed cash dividend for 2015. For 2015, the NOK amount covers first quarter while the USD amount is for second, third and fourth quarter. See section 6.1 Dividend policy.

3)

Excluding special dividend and share buy-back.

4)

Conversions between NOK and USD are conducted by applying the year end exchange rate for the respective year.

5)

Total dividend per share in NOK divided by EPS.

6)

Total dividend per share in NOK divided by year end share price.

 

Number of employees

Women

Permanent employees and percentage of women in the Statoil group

2017

2016

2015

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

17,632

18,034

18,977

30%

30%

30%

Rest of Europe

947

838

855

25%

28%

29%

Africa

78

78

98

37%

36%

35%

Asia

69

73

97

52%

59%

36%

North America

1,174

1,230

1,265

33%

35%

35%

South America

345

286

289

35%

37%

38%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

20,245

20,539

21,581

30%

31%

30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-OECD

599

541

590

37%

40%

40%

110962   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

 

 

As of 31 December 2015, Statoil represented 14.68% of the total value of all companies registered on the Oslo Børs, with a market value of NOK 394 billion.

Statoil's share price closed at NOK 123.70 at the end of 2015.

Taking into consideration the total dividend paid out in 2015 of NOK 7.20 per share, which includes four quarterly payments of NOK 1.80 per share for the third and fourth quarter of 2014 and first and second quarter of 2015, the total return was negative NOK 0.30 per share. The graph above, "Quote history", shows the development of the Statoil share price compared to the oil price and the Oslo Børs Benchmark Index (OSEBX). The board of directors proposes a dividend of USD 0.2201 per share for the fourth quarter 2015, for approval by the annual general meeting on 11 May 2016. Diluted earnings per share amounted to negative

Total workforce by region, employment type and new hires in the Statoil group in 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Geographical Region

Permanent employees

Consultants

Total Workforce1)

Consultants (%)

Part time (%)

New hires

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Norway

17,632

493

18,125

3%

3%

213

Rest of Europe

947

84

1,031

8%

2%

168

Africa

78

2

80

3%

0%

7

Asia

69

4

73

5%

0%

7

North America

1,174

201

1,375

15%

0%

231

South America

345

4

349

1%

0%

79

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

20,245

788

21,033

4%

3%

705

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-OECD

599

10

609

2%

NA

106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Contractor personnel, defined as third-party service providers who work at our onshore and offshore operations, are not included. These were roughly estimated to be around 30,000 in 2017.

EMPLOYEES IN STATOIL

The Statoil group employs 20,245 employees. Of these, approximately 17,600 are employed in Norway and approximately 2,600 outside Norway.

Statoil works systematically to build a diverse workforce by attracting, recruiting, developing and retaining people of every gender and different nationalities and age groups across all types of positions. In 2017, 19% of employees and 23% of our managerial staff held nationalities other than Norwegian.  Outside Norway, Statoil aims to increase the number of people and managers who are locally recruited and to reduce the long-term use of expats in business operations. In 2017, 71% of new hires in Statoil were non- Norwegians and 27% were women.

NOK 11.80, compared to positive NOK 6.87 in 2014.

The turnover of shares is a measure of traded volumes. On average, 5.1 million Statoil shares were traded on the Oslo Børs every day in 2015 compared to 3.7 million shares in 2014. In 2015, Statoil shares accounted for 15% of the total market value traded throughout the year (see illustration), compared to 12% in 2014.

Statoil ASA has one class of shares, and each share confers one vote at the general meeting. Statoil ASA had 3,188,647,103ordinary shares outstanding at year end.

As of 31 December 2015, Statoil had 91,774 shareholders registered in the Norwegian Central Securities Depository (VPS), down from 92,692 shareholders at 31 December 2014.

 

We believe that the global competition for talent in key development areas will grow over the coming years. We remain the employer of choice for engineering students and professionals in Norway, according to the annual Norwegian Universum Employer Attractiveness ranking.

During 2017 we continued to strengthen our entry level talent programmes. Our corporate graduate programme was revised into a two-year accelerated development programme spanning all geographies and professions, encompassing an introduction programme, networking activities, learning events and field trips, rotations and mentoring. This programme accelerates the development of young professionals and builds a strong understanding of Statoil’s value chains. In 2017, we recruited 69 graduates (of which 26 were women). At the end of 2017 we had 143 graduates (including 57 women) in Statoil.

In addition, our company-wide annual intake of apprentices reflects our long-term commitment to the education and training of young technicians and operators in our industry. In 2017, we awarded 139 apprenticeships, of which 45 were to women. The total number of apprentices at year end was 291 (including 85 women). In 2017, Statoil launched a subsurface internship programme pilot. This offers 30 newly graduated candidates a one year stay with us to build experience and help the transition from studies to working life.

Our annual Global People Survey (GPS), which addresses issues relevant to employee’s well-being and performance had a noticeably high response rate of 88% in 2017.  Employees’ responses reflected continued engagement for working with Statoil [8], with a score of 75 out of 100, compared to 72 out of 100 in 2016.[9] This score exceeded the corporate engagement KPI target. Employees reported an overall score of 71 out of 100 for competence and people development which is a good score. Our ambition is to strengthen this even further in 2018.

Our people performance data relates to permanent employees in our direct employment. Statoil defines consultants as contracted personnel that are mainly based in our offices. Temporary employees and contractor personnel, defined as third party service providers to our onshore and offshore operations, are not included in the table. These were roughly estimated to be around 30,000 in 2017. The information about people policies applies to Statoil ASA and its subsidiaries.


[8] The overall people engagement scoring reflects employee satisfaction, enthusiasm and pride associated with working for Statoil. The scoring is based on feedback received through an annual survey sent out to all employees.

[9] During 2017 the Global People Survey (GPS) questionnaire scale was changed from 1-6 to 1-10 and the reporting index was changed to 0-100.  Historical data have therefore been converted to enable trend reporting.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    11197


 

6.1 Dividend policyEqual opportunities

It is Statoil's ambitionWe are committed to grow the annual cash dividend measuredbuilding a workplace that promotes diversity and aspire for Statoil to be an inclusive workplace where all individuals can share their perspectives, be themselves and develop and thrive in USD per share in line with long-term underlying earnings.

Statoil’s board approves first, second and third quarter interim dividends, based on an authorisation from the annual general meeting (AGM), while the AGM approves the fourth quarter dividend and the implicit the total dividend based on a proposal from the board. When deciding the interim dividends and recommending the total annual dividend level, the board will take into consideration expected cash flow, capital expenditure plans, financing requirements and appropriate financial flexibility. In addition to cash dividend, Statoil might buy back shares as part of total distribution of capital to the shareholders. The shareholders at the AGM may vote to reduce, but may not increase, the fourth quarter dividend proposed by the board of directors. It is Statoil’s intention to have this authorisation approved at the AGM. Statoil announces dividend payments in connection with quarterly results. Payment of quarterly dividends is expected to take place approximately four months after the announcement of each quarterly dividend.

The board of directors updated the dividend policy in 2015 to reflect USD as the declaration currency.

The board of directors proposes to the AGM a dividend of USD 0.2201 per share for the fourth quarter 2015 and the introduction of a two-year scrip dividend programme for eligible shareholders starting from the fourth quarter 2015. The scrip programme will give shareholders the option to receive quarterly dividends in cash or in newly issued shares in Statoil at a 5% discount for the fourth quarter 2015. The Norwegian Government, as majority shareholder, supports the proposal and will seek the Norwegian Parliament’s approval to vote in favour of the proposal at the AGM. The Norwegian government intends to match subscription of shares by minority shareholders, and thereby maintain its ownership share at 67% throughout the programme.

6.1.1 Dividends

In 2014 Statoil implemented quarterly dividend payments and from second quarter 2015 Statoil implemented USD as dividend declaration currency.

Although we currently intend to pay quarterly dividends on our ordinary shares, we cannot give an assurance that dividends will be paid, or predict the amount of any dividends. Future dividends will depend on a number of factors prevailing at the time our board of directors considers any dividend payment. The following table shows the cash dividend amounts to all shareholders since 2010 on a per share basis and in aggregate.

 

 

Ordinary dividend per share

 

 

Ordinary dividend per share

Fiscal year

Curr.

Q1

 

Curr.

Q2

 

Curr.

Q3

 

Curr.

Q4

 

Curr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOK

6.5000

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOK

6.7500

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOK

7.0000

2014

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

7.2000

2015

NOK

1.8000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOK

1.8000

2015

 

 

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.6603

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil commenced quarterly dividends in 2014. During 2015 Statoil paid four quarterly dividends. The third quarter 2014 dividend was paid out in February 2015, the fourth quarter 2014 dividend was paid out in May 2015, the first quarter 2015 dividend was paid out in August 2015 and the second quarter 2015 dividend was paid out in November 2015. The third quarter 2015 dividend was paid out in February 2016. The proposed fourth quarter 2015 dividend will be considered at the annual general meeting 11 May 2016. The Statoil share will be traded ex dividend 12 May 2016 and if approved, the dividend will be disbursed around late June 2016. For US ADR holders, the ex-dividend date will be 12 May 2016 and expected payment date for ADR holders will be in June 2016.safe working environment.

 

FromDuring 2017, we continued to analyse the second quarter 2015 Statoil implemented declaring dividendsdiversity of our pipeline, at all levels and in USD. As fromall locations, to ensure continued improvement in our representation. In 2017, the third quarter 2015 only dividendoverall percentage of women in USD per share will be announced. Dividendsthe company was 30%. The percentage of women in NOK per share will be communicated four business days after record date for shareholders at Oslo Børs. Since we will declare dividends in USD, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the amounts in NOK received by shareholders on the Oslo Børs.

Share repurchase

In addition to a cash dividend, Statoil may buy back shares as part of its total distribution of capital to its shareholders. For the period 2013-2015, the board of directors was authorisedis 40% (33% among the employee representatives and 43% among members elected by the annual general meetingshareholders). In the corporate executive committee, the female representation remained at 27%. The percentage of women in leadership positions was 28% in 2017. We continue to pay close attention to male-dominated positions and discipline areas, and in 2017 the proportion of female engineers remained stable at 27% in Statoil ASA. We will work actively to repurchase Statoil sharesincrease these numbers in 2018 through our development programmes, such as the local talent programme, as part of a broader diversity and inclusion agenda.

Unions and representatives

We believe in involving our people and their appropriate representatives in the marketdevelopment of the company. We respect our employees’ right to freedom of association and thereby their right to negotiate and cooperate through relevant representative bodies. The specific ways in which we involve our employees and/or their appropriate representatives in business and organisational issues may vary according to local laws and practices in specific geographical locations.

In Statoil ASA, 73% of the employees in the parent company are members of a trade union. Work councils and working environment committees are established where required by law or agreement.

In Norway, the formal basis for subsequent annulment.collaboration with labour unions is established in the Basic Agreements between the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) and the corresponding respective national labour confederations (unions). We have not undertaken any share repurchase based on this authorisation.local collective wage agreements with five trade unions in Statoil ASA.

 

The European Works Council continues to be an important forum for collaboration between the company and our European employees.

Statoil promotes good employee and industrial relations practices through various networks and forums, including IndustriALL Global Union.

In 2017, we continued to have close cooperation with employee representatives in Norway discussing strategic matters such as changes to our people performance evaluation, organisational changes and ongoing safety improvement work. Such dialogues provide valuable perspectives and better decisions.

112982   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

It is Statoil’s intention to renew this authorisation at the annual general meeting. Statoil intends to use share buybacks more actively going forward, based on balance sheet strength considerations. 

3  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    11399


 

6.2 Shares purchased by issuer3.1 INTRODUCTION

 

Shares are acquired in the market for transfer to employees under the share savings scheme in accordance with the limits set by the board of directors. No shares were repurchased in the market for the purpose of subsequent annulment in 2015.

6.2.1 Statoil's share savings plan

Since 2004, Statoil has had a share savings plan for employees of the company. The purpose of this plan is to strengthen the business cultureStatoil’s objective and encourage loyalty through employees becoming part-owners of the company.

Through regular salary deductions, employees can invest up to 5% of their base salary in Statoil shares. In addition, the company contributes 20% of the total share investment made by employees in Norway, up to a maximum of NOK 1,500 per year (approximately USD 170). This company contribution is a tax-free employee benefit under current Norwegian tax legislation. After a lock-in period of two calendar years, one extra share will be awarded for each share purchased. Under current Norwegian tax legislation, the share award is a taxable employee benefit, with a value equal to the value of the shares and taxed at the time of the award.

The board of directors is authorised to acquire Statoil shares in the market on behalf of the company. The authorisation may be used to acquire own shares for a total nominal value of up to NOK 35 million. Shares acquired under this authorisation may only be used for sale and transfer to employees of the Statoil group as part of the company's share savings plan as approved by the board of directors. The minimum and maximum amount that may be paid per share is NOK 50 and 500, respectively.

The authorisation is valid until the next annual general meeting, but not beyond 30 June 2016. This authorisation replaces the previous authorisation to acquire Statoil's own shares for implementation of the share savings plan granted by the annual general meeting 14 May 2014. It is Statoil’s intention to renew this authorisation at the annual general meeting. Statoil intends to use share buybacks more actively going forward, based on balance sheet strength considerations.

The nominal value of each share is NOK 2.50. With a maximum overall nominal value of NOK 35 million, the authorisation for the repurchase of shares in connection with the group's share savings plan covers the repurchase of no more than 14 million shares.

Period in which shares were repurchased

Number of shares repurchased

Average price per share in NOK

Total number of shares purchased as part of programme

Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programme authorisation1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jan-15

 713,771  

 130.6301  

 4,713,258  

 6,286,742  

Feb-15

 628,251  

 149.5611  

 5,341,509  

 5,658,491  

Mar-15

 700,062  

 134.5595  

 6,041,571  

 4,958,429  

Apr-15

 598,244  

 157.0929  

 6,639,815  

 4,360,185  

May-15

 605,625  

 154.6826  

 7,245,440  

 3,754,560  

Jun-15

 664,037  

 140.9826  

 664,037  

 13,335,963  

Jul-15

 661,604  

 141.2402  

 1,325,641  

 12,674,359  

Aug-15

 707,278  

 132.0766  

 2,032,919  

 11,967,081  

Sep-15

 781,215  

 119.1604  

 2,814,134  

 11,185,866  

Oct-15

 661,646  

 140.4563  

 3,475,780  

 10,524,220  

Nov-15

 717,182  

 129.8833  

 4,192,962  

 9,807,038  

Dec-15

 750,203  

 123.5585  

 4,943,165  

 9,056,835  

Jan-16

 878,834  

 102.6997  

 5,821,999  

 8,178,001  

Feb-16

 745,858  

 117.5826  

 6,567,857  

 7,432,143  

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 9,813,810 2)

 132.4013 3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

The authorisation to repurchase a maximum of 11 million shares with a maximum overall nominal value of NOK 27.5 million for repurchase of shares in connection with the share savings plan was given by the annual general meeting on 14 May 2014. The authorisation was maintained by the annual general meeting on 19 May 2015 at a maximum of 14 million shares with a maximum overall nominal value of 35 million for repurchase of shares, valid until 30 June 2016.  

2)

All shares repurchased have been purchased in the open market and pursuant to the authorisation mentioned above.

3)

Weighted average price per share.

114Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


6.3 Information and communications

Updated information about Statoil's financial performance and future prospects forms the basis for assessing the value of the company.

Information provided to the stock market must be transparent and ensure equal treatment of all shareholders, and it must aim to provide shareholders with correct, clear, relevant and timely information that forms the basis for assessing the value of the company.

Statoil shares are listed on the Oslo Børs, and its American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We distribute share price-sensitive information through the international wire services, the Oslo Børs in Norway, the Securities and Exchange Commission in the US, and our website Statoil.com

Our registrar manages our shares listed on the Oslo Børs on our behalf and provides the connection to the Norwegian Central Securities Depository (VPS). Important services provided by the registrar are investor services for private shareholders, the disbursement of dividends and assistance at our general meetings. DnB Bank is currently the account registrar for Statoil.

6.3.1 Investor contact

Our investor relations staff function (IR) coordinates the dialogue with our shareholders.

We place great emphasis on ensuring that relevant and timely information is distributed to the capital markets. Given the size and diversity of our shareholder base, the opportunities for direct shareholder interaction are limited. Our "Investor Centre" web pages are therefore specially designed for investors and analysts who wish to follow the company's progress - Statoil.com/IR.

We broadcast our quarterly presentations and other relevant presentations by management directly on the internet, and the related reports are made available together with other relevant information on our website.

Ticker Codes:

Oslo Børs: STL

New York Stock Exchange: STO

Reuters: STL.OL

Bloomberg: STL NO


Financial calendar for 2016

04 February

Fourth quarter results and strategy update

16 February

Q3 2015 ADS trading ex-dividend

17 February

Q3 2015 ordinary share trading ex-dividend

26 February

Q3 2015 ordinary share dividend payment

04 March

Q3 2015 ADS dividend payment

18 March 

Publication annual report 2015

27 April

First quarter 2016

11 May

Annual general meeting

12 May

Q4 2015 ADS trading ex-dividend

12 May

Q4 2015 ordinary share trading ex-dividend

June

Q4 2015 ordinary share dividend payment

June

Q4 2015 ADS dividend payment

27 July

Second quarter 2016

end August

Q1 2016 ADS trading ex-dividend

end August

Q1 2016 ordinary share trading ex-dividend

end August

Q1 2016 ordinary share dividend payment

early September

Q1 2016 ADS dividend payment

27 October

Third quarter 2016

end November

Q2 2016 ADS trading ex-dividend

end November

Q2 2016 ordinary share trading ex-dividend

end November

Q2 2016 ordinary share dividend payment

early December

Q2 2016 ADS dividend payment

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015115


6.4 Market and market prices

The principal trading market for our ordinary shares is the Oslo Børs. The ordinary shares are also listed on the New York Stock Exchange, trading in the form of American Depositary Shares (ADS).

Statoil's shares have been listed on the Oslo Børst since our initial public offering on 18 June 2001. The ADSs traded on the New York Stock Exchange are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADR), and each ADS represents one ordinary share. Statoil has a sponsored ADR facility with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as depositary.

6.4.1 Share prices

These are the reported high and low quotations at market closing for the ordinary shares on the Oslo Børs and New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated.

They are derived from the Oslo Børs Daily Official List, and the highest and lowest sales prices of the ADSs as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape.

 

NOK per ordinary share

 

USD per ADS

Share price

High

Low

 

High

Low

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December

 

 

 

 

 

2011

160.50

113.70

 

29.58

20.16

2012

162.40

133.80

 

28.92

22.15

2013

147.70

123.00

 

27.00

20.14

2014

194.80

120.00

 

31.91

15.82

2015

160.80

116.30

 

21.31

13.42

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, March 31, 2014

171.30

146.40

 

28.51

23.37

Monday, June 30, 2014

194.80

164.90

 

31.91

27.60

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

191.00

171.90

 

31.01

26.93

Tuesday, December 31, 2014

173.70

120.00

 

26.79

15.82

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

149.80

125.80

 

19.62

16.25

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

160.80

140.10

 

21.31

17.59

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

141.40

116.30

 

17.56

13.85

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

145.60

118.70

 

17.74

13.42

March, up until 8 March 2016

133.80

97.90

 

15.94

11.38

 

 

 

 

 

 

Month of

 

 

 

 

 

September 2015

126.80

116.80

 

15.31

13.85

October 2015

144.70

126.40

 

17.74

14.83

November 2015

145.60

129.70

 

17.06

14.90

December 2015

135.70

118.70

 

15.70

13.42

January 2016

123.50

97.90

 

13.96

11.38

February 2016

127.10

108.00

 

14.56

12.49

March up until 8 March 2016

133.80

127.30

 

15.94

14.78

116Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


6.4.2 Statoil ADR programme fees

Fees and charges payable by a holder of ADSs.

As depositary from 31 January 2013, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas collects its fees for the delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees from investors by deducting the fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

The charges of the depositary payable by investors are as follows:

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:

For:

USD 5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)

·Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property

·Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

USD 0.02(or less) per ADS, subject to the company's consent

·Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders

USD 0.05 (or less) per ADS, subject to the company's consent

·For the operation and maintenance costs in administering the ADR program

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs

·Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered holders

Registration or transfer fees

·Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares

Expenses of the Depositary

·Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (as provided in the deposit agreement)

·Converting foreign currency to US dollars

Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes

·As necessary

Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities

·As necessary

Reimbursements and payments made and fee waivers granted by the depositary

The depositary has agreed to reimburse certain company expenses related to the company's ADR programme and incurred by the company in connection with the programme. In the year ended 31 December 2015, the depositary reimbursed approximately USD 1.43 million to the company in relation to certain expenses including investor relations expenses, expenses related to the maintenance of the ADR programme, legal counsel fees, printing and ADR certificates

The depositary has also agreed to waive fees for costs associated with the administration of the ADR programme, and it has paid certain expenses directly to third parties on behalf of the company. The expenses paid to third parties include expenses relating to reporting services and access charges to its online platform, re-registration costs borne by the custodian. For the year ended 31 December 2015, the depositary paid expenses of approximately USD 69,576 directly to third parties.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015117


6.5 Taxation

This section describes the material Norwegian tax consequences that apply to shareholders resident in Norway and to non-resident shareholders in connection with the acquisition, ownership and disposal of shares and American Depositary Shares (ADS). The term “shareholder” refers to both holders of shares and holders of ADSs, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

Norwegian tax matters

The outline does not provide a complete description of all tax regulations that might be relevant (i.e. for investors to whom special regulations may be applicable), and is based on current law and practice. Shareholders should consult their professional tax adviser for advice about individual tax consequences.

Taxation of dividends

Corporate shareholders (i.e. limited liability companies and similar entities) residing in Norway for tax purposes are generally subject to tax in Norway on dividends received from Norwegian companies. The basis for taxation is 3% of the dividends received, which is subject to the standard income tax rate. The standard income tax rate has been reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016.

Individual shareholders resident in Norway for tax purposes are subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016) in Norway for dividend income exceeding a basic tax free allowance. However, in 2016 dividend income exceeding the basic tax free allowance is grossed up with a factor of 1.15 before taken to taxation, resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.75% (25% x 1.15). The tax free allowance is computed for each individual share or ADS on the basis of the cost price of that share or ADS multiplied by a risk-free interest rate. The risk-free interest rate will be determined every income year. Any part of the calculated allowance for one year that exceeds the dividend distributed for the share or ADS ("unused allowance") may be carried forward and set off against future dividends received for (or gains upon the realisation of, see below) the same share or ADS. Any unused allowance will also be added to the basis for computation of the allowance for the same share or ADS the following year.

Non-resident shareholders are as a rule subject to withholding tax at a rate of 25% on dividends distributed by Norwegian companies. This withholding tax does not apply to corporate shareholders in the EEA area that document that they are genuinely established and carry on genuine economic business activity within the EEA area, provided that Norway is entitled to receive information from the state of residence pursuant to a tax treaty or other international treaty. If no such treaty exists with the state of residence, the shareholder may instead present confirmation issued by the tax authorities of the state of residence verifying the documentation. Individual shareholders resident for tax purposes in the EEA area may apply to the Norwegian tax authorities for a refund if the tax withheld by the distributing company exceeds the tax that would have been levied on individual shareholders resident in Norway.

The withholding rate of 25% is often reduced in tax treaties between Norway and other countries. Generally, the treaty rate does not exceed 15% and, in cases where a corporate shareholder holds a qualifying percentage of ownership in the distributing company, the withholding tax rate on dividends may be further reduced. The withholding tax rate in the tax treaty between the United States and Norway is currently 15% in all cases. It is the responsibility of the distributing company to deduct the withholding tax when dividends are paid to non-resident shareholders.

The reduced withholding rate will generally only apply to dividends paid on shares held by shareholders who are able to properly demonstrate to the company that they are entitled to the benefits of the tax treaty.

For holders of shares and ADSs deposited with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (Deutsche Bank), documentation establishing that the holder is eligible for the benefits under the tax treaty with Norway, may be provided to Deutsche Bank. Deutsche Bank has been granted permission by the Norwegian tax authorities to receive dividends from us for redistribution to a beneficial owner of shares and ADSs at the applicable treaty withholding rate.

Dividends paid to shareholders (either directly or through a depositary) who have not provided the relevant documentation to the relevant party that they are eligible for the reduced rate, will be subject to withholding tax of 25%. The beneficial owners will in this case have to apply to the Central Office - Foreign Tax Affairs (COFTA) for a refund of the excess amount of tax withheld.

According to information provided by the Central Office of Foreign Tax Affairs (COFTA), an application for a refund of withholding tax from shareholders must contain the following:

1.Full name, address and tax identification number of the claimant.

2.Payment details, including name of account holder, either a Norwegian bank account number or IBAN and SWIFT/BIC code. The IBAN account must be able to receive NOK as the refund will be transferred in NOK.

3.A specification of the Norwegian company(ies) involved, the exact amount of shares, the date of each dividend payment, the dividend per share, the total dividend payment, the Norwegian withholding tax rate, and the reclaimed amount. All amounts must be given in NOK.

4.Documentation that confirms the claimant’s residency.

118Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


·A claim according to a tax treaty must contain a Certificate of Residence issued by the competent local tax authorities with reference to the claimant's tax identification number. The certificate of residence must state that the claimant was resident according to the tax treaty with Norway during the year when the decision to distribute the dividend was made. The confirmation must be in original. The Certificate of Residence must mention solely the claimant’s name

·A claim according to the tax exemption method cf. tax act section 2-38 must contain confirmation that the claimant is registered and based within the EEA and genuinely established in that country

5.A credit advice, certifying that the claimant has received the dividends and has been subject to Norwegian withholding tax on the dividends. The credit advice must fill the following criteria:

·It must document the chain of transactions, including information about the foreign custodian/bank/clearing central registered in Norway that initially received the dividends. If the dividends have been paid through a chain of transactions, each transaction must be documented with a credit advice issued to the initial receiver

·It must be issued by the bank that credits the claimant the dividend payment. It must contain the following details:

·Name of the payment recipient, i.e. the claimant

·Name and ISIN of the stock etc

·The exact amount of shares

·The gross amount and withholding tax in NOK

·The ex-date, the record date and the pay-date

·The dividend per share

Please note that the credit advice must specify that the dividend payment has been subject to withholding tax, not just tax. This clarification will be a definite requirement on claims made from 1 January 2014 onward.

6.Power of attorney/attestation, a general power of attorney from the beneficial owner to authorise the claimant to claim a refund.

The power of attorney does not need to mention the specific dividend payments. Still, COFTA requires that the claimant makes a spreadsheet listing the names of the companies from which the dividends were received, with the dates and the amounts of withholding tax. This spreadsheet should accompany the application and has to be approved and signed by the beneficial owner.

Please note that only one refund claim can be made regarding each dividend payment, and applications for the same claim must not be filed several times, neither directly nor via custodians.

7.A claim should also contain general information about the claimant as regards legal, corporate and taxable aspects. Please note that only the beneficial owner may apply for a refund of withholding tax. An entity that is acting on behalf of someone else as either trustee or investment manager, and who is as such the registered or indirect owner of the dividends, is not entitled to a refund. Neither is an entity that receives the dividend payments and passes them directly on to other entities/persons entitled to a refund.

In some cases COFTA may request further, and more specific, information about the claim for refund and the claimant. An assessment of the entity and of the validity of the claim is made in each individual case.

The application should be sent to the following address: Central Office Foreign Tax Affairs/Sentralskattekontoret for utenlandssaker, Postboks 8031, 4068 Stavanger, NORWAY

Corporate shareholders that carry on business activities in Norway, and whose shares or ADSs are effectively connected with such activities are not subject to withholding tax. For such shareholders, 3% of the received dividends are subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016).

Taxation on the realisation of shares and ADSs

Corporate shareholders resident in Norway for tax purposes are not subject to tax in Norway on gains derived from the sale, redemption or other disposal of shares or ADSs in Norwegian companies. Capital losses are not deductible.

Individual shareholders residing in Norway for tax purposes are subject to tax in Norway on the sale, redemption or other disposal of shares or ADSs. Gains or losses in connection with such realisation are included in the individual's ordinary taxable income in the year of disposal, which is subject to the standard income tax rate, being reduced from 27% in 2015 to 25% in 2016. However, in 2016 the taxable gain or deductible loss is grossed up with a factor of 1.15 before included in the ordinary taxable income, resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.75% (25% x 1.15).

The taxable gain or deductible loss (before gross up) is calculated as the sales price adjusted for transaction expenses minus the taxable basis. A shareholder's tax basis is normally equal to the acquisition cost of the shares or ADSs. Any unused allowance pertaining to a share may be deducted from a taxable gain on the same share or ADS, but may not lead to or increase a deductible loss. Furthermore, any unused allowance may not be set off against gains from the realisation of the other shares or ADSs.

If the shareholder disposes of shares or ADSs acquired at different times, the shares or ADSs that were first acquired will be deemed to be first sold (the "FIFO" principle) when calculating the taxable gain or loss.

A corporate shareholder or an individual shareholder who ceases to be tax resident in Norway due to domestic law or tax treaty provisions may, in certain circumstances, become subject to Norwegian exit taxation on capital gains related to shares or ADSs.

Shareholders not residing in Norway are generally not subject to tax in Norway on capital gains, and losses are not deductible on the sale, redemption or other disposal of shares or ADSs in Norwegian companies, unless the shareholder carries on business activities in Norway and such shares or ADSs are or have been effectively connected with such activities.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015119


Wealth tax

The shares or ADSs are included in the basis for the computation of wealth tax imposed on individuals resident in Norway for tax purposes. Norwegian limited companies and certain similar entities are not subject to wealth tax. The current marginal wealth tax rate is 0.85% of the value assessed. The assessment value of listed shares (including ADSs) is 100% of the listed value of such shares or ADSs on 1 January in the assessment year.

Non-resident shareholders are not subject to wealth tax in Norway for shares and ADSs in Norwegian limited companies unless the shareholder is an individual and the shareholding is effectively connected with the individual's business activities in Norway.

Inheritance tax and gift tax

No inheritance or gift tax is imposed in Norway.

Transfer tax

No transfer tax is imposed in Norway in connection with the sale or purchase of shares or ADSs.

United States tax matters

This section describes the material United States federal income tax consequences for US holders (as defined below) of owning shares or ADSs. It only applies to you if you hold your shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. This section does not apply to you if you are a member of a special class of holders subject to special rules, including:

·dealers in securities

·traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings

·tax-exempt organisations

·life insurance companies

·persons liable for alternative minimum tax

·persons that actually or constructively own 10% or more of the voting stock of Statoil

·persons that hold shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction

·persons that purchase or sell shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for tax purposes or

·persons whose functional currency is not USD

This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions, and the Convention between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Property (the ''Treaty''). These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. For United States federal income tax purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will generally be treated as the owner of the ordinary shares represented by those ADRs. Exchanges of shares for ADRs and ADRs for shares will not generally be subject to United States federal income tax.

If a partnership holds the shares or ADSs, the United States federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the tax treatment of the partnership. A partner in a partnership holding the shares or ADSs should consult its tax adviser with regard to the United States federal income tax treatment of an investment in the shares or ADSs.

You are a ''US holder'' if you are a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs and you are for United States federal income tax purposes:

·a citizen or resident of the United States;

·a United States domestic corporation;

·an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or

·a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust's administration and one or more United States persons are authorised to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

You should consult your own tax adviser regarding the United States federal, state and local and Norwegian and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of shares and ADSs in your particular circumstances.

Taxation of dividends

If you are a US holder, the gross amount of any dividend paid by Statoil out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes) is subject to United States federal income taxation. If you are a non-corporate US holder, dividends paid to you will be eligible to be taxed at the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains as long as, in the year that you receive the dividend, the shares or ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States or Statoil is eligible for benefits under the Treaty. To qualify for the preferential rates, you must hold the shares or ADSs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet certain other requirements. Furthermore, these tax consequences would be different if Statoil were to be treated as a PFIC as discussed below.

You must include any Norwegian tax withheld from the dividend payment in this gross amount even though you do not in fact receive the amount withheld as tax. The dividend is taxable for you when you, in the case of shares, or the depositary, in the case of ADSs, receive the dividend, actually or constructively. The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to United States corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations.

120Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The amount of the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a US holder will be the value in USD of the payments made in NOK determined at the spot NOK/USD rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether or not the payment is in fact converted into USD. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in the shares or ADSs and, to the extent in excess of your tax basis, will be treated as capital gain.

Subject to certain limitations, the 15% Norwegian tax withheld in accordance with the Treaty and paid to Norway will be creditable or deductible against your United States federal income tax liability. Special rules apply when determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the preferential rates. To the extent that a refund of the tax withheld is available to you under Norwegian law, the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability. Dividends will be income from sources outside the United States and will generally, depending on your circumstances, be either ''passive'' or ''general'' income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to you.

Any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange rate fluctuations during the period from the date you include the dividend payment in income until the date you convert the payment into USD will generally be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate. Such gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Taxation of capital gains

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, if you are a US holder and you sell or otherwise dispose of your shares or ADSs, you will generally recognise a capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the value in USD of the amount that you realise and your tax basis, determined in USD, in your shares or ADSs. A capital gain of a non-corporate US holder is generally taxed at preferential rates if the property is held for more than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

If you receive any foreign currency on the sale of shares or ADSs, you may recognise ordinary income or loss from sources within the United States as a result of currency fluctuations between the date of the sale of the shares or ADSs and the date the sales proceeds are converted into USD. You should consult your own tax adviser regarding how to account for payments made or received in a currency other than USD.

PFIC rules

We believe that the shares and ADSs should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If we were to be treated as a PFIC, unless a US holder elects to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the shares or ADSs, a gain realised on the sale or other disposition of the shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as a capital gain. Instead, if you are a US holder, you would be treated as if you had realised such gain and certain "excess distributions" ratably over your holding period for the shares or ADSs. Amounts allocated to the year in which the gain is realised or the “excess distribution” is received or to a taxable year before we were classified as a PFIC would be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates, and amounts allocated to all other years would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain or distribution was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. With certain exceptions, the shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during the period you held the shares or ADSs. Dividends that you receive from us will not be eligible for the preferential tax rates if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you, either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but will instead be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

Tax Filings

You should consult your own advisers regarding any tax filing or reporting obligations that arise out of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of shares or ADSs. Failure to comply with certain US tax filing or reporting obligations can cause you to be subject to significant penalties.

6.6 Exchange controls and limitations

Under Norwegian foreign exchange controls currently in effect, transfers of capital to and from Norway are not subject to prior government approval.

An exception applies to the physical transfer of payments in currency exceeding certain thresholds, which must be declared to the Norwegian custom authorities.

This means that non-Norwegian resident shareholders may receive dividend payments without Norwegian exchange control consent as long as the payment is made through a licensed bank or other licensed payment institution.

There are no restrictions affecting the rights of non-Norwegian residents or foreign owners to hold or vote for our shares.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015121


6.7 Exchange rates

The table below shows the high, low, average and end-of-period exchange rates for the Norwegian krone for USD 1.00 as announced by Norges Bank (Norway's central bank).

The average is computed using the monthly average exchange rates announced by Norges Bank during the period indicated.

For the year ended 31 December

Low

High

Average

End of Period

 

 

 

 

 

2011

5.2369

6.0315

5.6059

5.9927

2012

5.5349

6.1471

5.8172

5.5664

2013

5.4438

6.2154

5.8753

6.0837

2014

5.8611

7.6111

6.3011

7.4332

2015

7.3593

8.8090

8.0637

8.8090



 

Low

High

 

 

 

2015

 

 

September

8.0891

8.5783

October

8.0524

8.5700

November

8.4636

8.6929

December

8.4842

8.8090

 

 

 

2016

 

 

January

8.6641

8.9578

February

8.5111

8.7294

March (up to and including 8 March 2016)

8.5441

8.6791

On 8March 2016, the exchange rate announced by the Norges Bank for the Norwegian krone was USD 1.00 = NOK 8.5496.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Norwegian krone and the US dollar will affect the amounts in US dollars received by holders of American Depositary Shares (ADSs) on the conversion of dividends, if any, paid in Norwegian kroner on the ordinary shares, and they may affect the US dollar price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange.

122Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


6.8 Major shareholders

The Norwegian State is the largest shareholder in Statoil, with a direct ownership interest of 67%. Its ownership interest is managed by the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.

 

 

Pursuant to the exchange ratio agreed in connection with the merger with Hydro's oil and gas activities, the State's ownership interest in the merged company was 62.5%, or 1,992,959,739 shares, on 1 October 2007. In accordance with the Norwegian parliament's decision of 2001 concerning a minimum state shareholding in Statoil of two-thirds, the Government built up the State's ownership interest in Statoil by buying shares in the market during the period from June 2008 to March 2009. In March 2009, the Government announced that the State's direct ownership interest had reached 67%, and the Government's direct purchase of Statoil shares was completed.

As of 31 December 2015, the Norwegian State had a 67% direct ownership interest in Statoil and a 3.23% indirect interest through the National Insurance Fund (Folketrygdfondet), totaling 70.23%.

The Norwegian State is the only person or entity known to us to own beneficially, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of our outstanding shares. We have not been notified of any other beneficial owner of 5% or more of our ordinary shares as of 31 December 2015.

Statoil has one class of shares, and each share confers one vote at the general meeting. The Norwegian State does not have any voting rights that differ from the rights of other ordinary shareholders. Pursuant to the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes cast as well as of the votes represented at a general meeting is required to amend our articles of association. As long as the Norwegian State owns more than one-third of our shares, it will be able to prevent any amendments to our articles of association. Since the Norwegian State, acting through the Norwegian Minister of Petroleum and Energy, has in excess of two-thirds of the shares in the company, it has sole power to amend our articles of association. In addition, as majority shareholder, the Norwegian State has the power to control any decision at general meetings of our shareholders that requires a majority vote, including the election of the majority of the corporate assembly, which has the power to elect our board of directors and approve the dividend proposed by the board of directors.

The Norwegian State endorses the principles set out in "The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance", and it has stated that it expects companies in which the State has ownership interests to adhere to the code. The principle of ensuring equal treatment of different groups of shareholders is a key element in the State's own guidelines. In companies in which the State is a shareholder together with others, the State wishes to exercise the same rights and obligations as any other shareholder and not act in a manner that has a detrimental effect on the rights or financial interests of other shareholders. In addition to the principle of equal treatment of shareholders, emphasis is also placed on transparency in relation to the State's ownership and on the general meeting being the correct arena for owner decisions and formal resolutions.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015123


Shareholders at December 2015

Number of Shares

Ownership in %

 

 

 

 

1

Government of Norway

 2,136,393,559  

67.00%

2

Folketrygdfondet

 103,124,812  

3.20%

3

SAFE Investment Company Limited

 32,256,434  

1.00%

4

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

 31,513,618  

1.00%

5

INVESCO Asset Management Limited

 26,461,451  

0.80%

6

Schroder Investment Management Ltd. (SIM)

 23,330,607  

0.70%

7

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

 19,539,470  

0.60%

8

Allianz Global Investors GmbH

 18,371,484  

0.60%

9

KLP Forsikring

 16,642,798  

0.50%

10

Storebrand Kapitalforvaltning AS

 14,448,698  

0.50%

11

BlackRock Investment Management, LLC

 13,995,472  

0.40%

12

Epoch Investment Partners, Inc.

 13,815,430  

0.40%

13

State Street Global Advisors (US)

 13,670,590  

0.40%

14

DNB Asset Management AS

 13,641,273  

0.40%

15

Fidelity Worldwide Investment (UK) Ltd.

 11,886,480  

0.40%

16

Acadian Asset Management LLC

 11,578,950  

0.40%

17

TIAA-CREF

 11,231,159  

0.40%

18

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.

 11,003,874  

0.30%

19

APG Asset Management

 10,436,861  

0.30%

20

AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd.

 10,075,894  

0.30%

 

 

 

 

Source: Data collected by third party, authorized by Statoil, December 2015

 

 

124Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


7 Corporate governance

Statoil's objective is to create long-term value for its shareholders through the exploration for and production, transportation, refining and marketing of petroleum and petroleum-derived products and other forms of energy.

 

In pursuing its corporate objective, Statoil is committed to the highest standard of governance and to cultivating a values-based performance culture that rewards exemplary ethical practices, respect for the environment and personal and corporate integrity. Statoil believes that there is a link between high-quality governance and the creation of shareholder value.

 

The work of the board of directors is based on the existence of a clearly defined division of roles and responsibilities between the shareholders, the board of directors and the company's management.

 

Statoil’s governing structures and controls help to ensure that Statoil runs its business in a profitable manner for the benefit of shareholders, employees and other stakeholders in the societies in which Statoil operates.

 

The following principles underline Statoil’s approach to corporate governance:

·          All shareholders will be treated equally

·          Statoil will ensure that all shareholders have access to up-to-date, reliable and relevant information about its activities

·          Statoil will have a board of directors that is independent (as defined by Norwegian Standards)standards) of the group's management. The board focuses on preventing conflicts of interest between shareholders, the board of directors and the company's management

·          The board of directors will base its work on the principles for good corporate governance applicable at all times

 

Corporate governance in Statoil is subject to regular review and discussion by the board of directors.

 

Statoil's board of directors endorses the "Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance". The company's compliance with, and deviations from, the code's recommendations are commented on in a separate corporate governance statement issued by Statoil’s board of directors. This statement, which contains further details on the corporate governance of Statoil, is available at www.statoil.com/cg.

7.1 Articles of association

The articles of association and the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act form the legal framework for Statoil's operations.

Statoil's current articles of association were adopted at the annual general meeting of shareholders on 14 May 2013.2013, and last changed on 6 February 2018 following a share capital increase in connection to Statoil’s scrip dividend programme.

 

Summary of Statoil’s articles of association:

 

Name of the company

The registered name is Statoil ASA. Statoil is a Norwegian public limited company.

 

Registered office

Statoil’s registered office is in Stavanger, Norway, registered with the Norwegian Register of Business Enterprises under number 923 609 016.

 

ObjectObjective of the company

The objectobjective of Statoil is, either by itself or through participation in or together with other companies, to engage in the exploration, production, transportation, refining and marketing of petroleum and petroleum-derived products, and other forms of energy, as well as other business.

 

Share capital

Statoil’s share capital is NOK 7,971,617,757.508,346,653,047.50 divided into 3,188,647,1033,338,661,219 ordinary shares.

 

Nominal value of shares

The nominal value of each ordinary share is NOK 2.50.

 

Board of directors

Statoil’s articles of association provide that the board of directors shall consist of nine to 11 directors. The board, including the chair and the deputy chair, shall be elected by the corporate assembly for a period of up to two years.

Corporate assembly

Statoil has a corporate assembly comprising 18 members who are normally elected for a term of two years. The general meeting elects 12 members with four deputy members, and six members with deputy members are elected by and from among the employees.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015125


 

General meetings of shareholders

Statoil’s annual general meeting is held no later than 30 June each year.

The meeting will consider the annual report and accounts, including the distribution of any dividend, and any other matters required by law or the articles of association.

1002Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

Documents relating to matters to be dealt with at general meetings do not need to be sent to all shareholders if the documents are accessible on Statoil’s website. A shareholder may nevertheless request that such documents be sent to him/her.

 

Shareholders may vote in writing, including through electronic communication, for a period before the general meeting. In order to practise advance voting, the board of directors must stipulate applicable guidelines. Statoil's board of directors adopted guidelines for such advance voting in March 2012, and these guidelines are described in the notices of the annual general meetings.

 

Marketing of petroleum on behalf of the Norwegian State

Statoil’s articles of association provide that Statoil is responsible for marketing and selling petroleum produced under the SDFI's shares in production licences on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) as well as petroleum received by the Norwegian State paid as royalty together with its own production. Statoil’s general meeting adopted an instruction in respect of such marketing on 25 May 2001, as most recently amended by authorisation of the annual general meeting on 1911 May 2011.2017.

 

Nomination committee

The tasks of the nomination committee are to make recommendations to the general meeting regardingfor the election of and fees for shareholder-elected members and deputy members of the corporate assembly, the remuneration of members of the corporate assembly, the election and remuneration of the nomination committee, and to make recommendations to the corporate assembly regardingfor the election of and fees for shareholder-elected members of the board of directors to make recommendations toand remuneration of the corporate assembly regardingmembers of the board of directors and the election of the chair and the deputy chair of the board and to make recommendations to the general meeting regarding the election of and fees for members of the nomination committee.

corporate assembly.The general meeting may adopt instructions for the nomination committee.

 

The full articles of association are enclosed hereto as Exhibit 1, and are also available at Statoil.com/www.statoil.com/articlesofassociation.

  

7.2 Code of Conduct

Ethics – Statoil’s approach

Statoil believes that responsible and ethical behaviorbehaviour is a necessary condition for a sustainable business. Statoil’s Code of Conduct (the Code) is based on its values and reflects Statoil’s commitment to high ethical standards in all its activities.

 

Our Code of Conduct

The Code of Conduct describes Statoil’s code of business practice and the requirements to expected behaviorbehaviour in areas such as anti-corruption, fair competition, human rights and non-discrimination working environments with equal opportunity.opportunities. The Code of Conduct applies to Statoil’s board members, employees and hired personnel.

 

Statoil seeks to work with others who share its commitment to ethics and compliance, and Statoil manages its risks through in-depth knowledge of suppliers, business partners and markets. Statoil expects its suppliers and business partners to comply with applicable laws, respect internationally recognised human rights and adhere to ethical standards which are consistent with Statoil’s ethical requirements when working for or together with Statoil. In joint ventures and entities where Statoil does not have control, Statoil makes good faith efforts to encourage the adoption of ethics and anti-corruption policies and procedures that are consistent with itssits standards. Anyone working for Statoil who does not comply with the Code of Conduct faces disciplinary action, up to and including summery dismissal or termination of their contract.

Training and Certifying the Code of Conduct

The Code of Conduct training and comprehensive trainings on specific issues, including anti-corruption, anti-trust and anti-trust,reporting, is carried out to explain how the Code of Conduct applies and to describe the tools that Statoil has made available to address risk.

 

All Statoil employees have to annually confirm electronically that they understand and will comply with the Code of Conduct (Code certification). The Code certification reminds the individuals of their duty to comply with Statoil’s values and ethical requirements, and creates an environment with open dialog on ethical issues, both internally and externally.

 

Anti-corruption compliance programme

Statoil is against all forms of corruption including bribery, facilitation payments and trading in influence and has a company-wide anti-corruption compliance programme which implements its zero-tolerance policy. The programme includes mandatory procedures designed to comply with applicable laws and regulations and training on relevant issues such as gifts, hospitality and conflicts of interest. Compliance officers, who are responsible for ensuring that ethics and anti-corruption considerations are integrated into Statoil’s business activities, constitute an important part of the programme.

 

In 2017, Statoil Anti-Corruption Compliance Manual was updated to reflect the ongoing improvements and best practice in our anti-corruption program. Statoil continues to maintain is global network of compliance officers responsible for supporting the business to ensure that ethical and anti-corruption considerations are integrated into Statoil’s activities no matter where they take place. In 2017, we worked towards strengthening support across the organisation through the deployment of senior corporate compliance resources

126Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    101


 

In 2015,to support regional activities. Statoil focusedcontinue to work with our partners and suppliers on ethics and anti-corruption, and have initiated dialogs with several of our partners on the systematic supportrisks that we jointly face and follow up of its compliance officers in the business units and on strengthening the compliance officer network within Statoil. Further, the Statoil Code of Conduct was subjectactions that can be taken to a comprehensive review, and was updated and made more user-friendly.  In 2016 , the new Code will be rolled out and implemented.address them.

 

Speak Up

Statoil is committed to maintain an open dialog on ethical issues. The Code of Conduct requires those who have a question or suspect misconduct to raise their concern either through internal channels or through Statoil’s external Ethics Helpline. Employees are encouraged to discuss their concerns with their supervisor. Statoil recognises that raising a concern is not always easy so there are have several internal channels for taking concerns forward, including through human resources or the ethics and compliance function in the legal department. Concerns can also be expressed through the externally operated Ethics Helpline which is available 24/7, and allows for anonymous reporting and two-way communication through the use of a pin-code. Statoil has a non-retaliation policy for anyone who reports in good faith.

 

More information about Statoil’s policies and requirements related to the Code of Conduct is available on Statoil.com/ethics.www.statoil.com/ethics.

Compliance with NYSE listing rules

Statoil's primary listing is on the Oslo Børs, but Statoil is also registered as a foreign private issuer with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

 

7.3American Depositary Receipts represent the company's ordinary shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). While Statoil's corporate governance practices follow the requirements of Norwegian law, Statoil is also subject to the NYSE's listing rules.

As a foreign private issuer, Statoil is exempted from most of the NYSE corporate governance standards that domestic US companies must comply with. However, Statoil is required to disclose any significant ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those applicable to domestic US companies under the NYSE rules. A statement of differences is set out below:

Corporate governance guidelines

The NYSE rules require domestic US companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Statoil's corporate governance principles are developed by the management and the board of directors, in accordance with the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance and applicable law. Oversight of the board of directors and management is exercised by the corporate assembly.

Director independence

The NYSE rules require domestic US companies to have a majority of "independent directors". The NYSE definition of an "independent director" sets out five specific tests of independence and also requires an affirmative determination by the board of directors that the director has no material relationship with the company.

Pursuant to Norwegian company law, Statoil's board of directors consists of members elected by shareholders and employees. Statoil's board of directors has determined that, in its judgment, all of the shareholder-elected directors are independent. In making its determinations of independence, the board focuses inter alia on there not being any conflicts of interest between shareholders, the board of directors and the company's management. It does not strictly make its determination based on the NYSE's five specific tests, but take into consideration all relevant circumstances which may in the board’s view affect the directors’ independence. The directors elected from among Statoil's employees would not be considered independent under the NYSE rules because they are employees of Statoil. None of the employee-elected directors are an executive officer of the company.

For further information about the board of directors, see 3.8 Corporate assembly, board of directors and management.

Board committees

Pursuant to Norwegian company law, managing the company is the responsibility of the board of directors. Statoil has an audit committee, a safety, sustainability and ethics committee and a compensation and executive development committee. They are responsible for preparing certain matters for the board of directors. The audit committee and the compensation and executive development committee operate pursuant to charters that are broadly comparable to the form required by the NYSE rules. They report on a regular basis to, and are subject to, continuous oversight by the board of directors. For further information about the board’s sub-committees, see the section The work of the board of directors.

Statoil complies with the NYSE rule regarding the obligation to have an audit committee that meets the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The members of Statoil's audit committee include an employee-elected director. Statoil relies on the exemption provided for in Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv)(C) from the independence requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the employee-elected director. Statoil does not believe that its reliance on this exemption will materially adversely affect the ability of the audit committee to act independently or to satisfy the other requirements of Rule 10A-3 relating to audit committees. The other members of the audit committee meet the independence requirements under Rule 10A-3.


Among other things, the audit committee evaluates the qualifications and independence of the company's external auditor.However, in accordance with Norwegian law, the auditor is elected by the annual general meeting of the company's shareholders.

Statoil does not have a nominating/corporate governance sub-committee formed from its board of directors. Instead, the roles prescribed for a nominating/corporate governance committee under the NYSE rules are principally carried out by the corporate assembly and the nomination committee which are elected by the general meeting of shareholders. NYSE rules require the compensation committee of US companies to comprise independent directors under the NYSE rules, recommend senior management remuneration and make a determination on the independence of advisors when engaging them. Statoil, as foreign private issuer, is exempt from complying with these rules and is permitted to follow its home country regulations. Statoil considers all its compensation committee members to be independent (under Statoil’s framework which, as discussed above, is not identical to that of NYSE). Statoil's compensation committee makes recommendations to the board about management remuneration, including that of the CEO. The compensation committee assesses its own performance and has the authority to hire external advisors. The nomination committee, which is elected by the general meeting of shareholders, recommends to the corporate assembly the candidates and remuneration of the board of directors. Also, the nomination committee recommends to the general meeting of shareholders the candidates and remuneration of the corporate assembly and the nomination committee.

Shareholder approval of equity compensation plans

The NYSE rules require that, with limited exemptions, all equity compensation plans must be subject to a shareholder vote. Under Norwegian company law, although the issuance of shares and authority to buy back company shares must be approved by Statoil's annual general meeting of shareholders, the approval of equity compensation plans is normally reserved for the board of directors.

3.2 General meeting of shareholders



The general meeting of shareholders is Statoil’s supreme corporate body. The objectiveIt serves as a democratic and effective forum for interaction between the company’s shareholders, board of the general meeting is to ensure shareholder democracydirectors and all shareholders are encouraged to participate in person or by proxy.management.

 

The general meeting of shareholders is Statoil’s supreme corporate body. The 2016next annual general meeting (AGM) is scheduled for 1115 May 20162018 in Stavanger, Norway, with simultaneous transmission by webcast through our website. The AGM is conducted in Norwegian, with simultaneous English translation during the webcast. At Statoil's AGM on 11 May 2017, 76.80% of the share capital was represented either by advance voting, in person or by proxy.

 

The main framework for convening and holding Statoil's AGM is as follows:

Pursuant to Statoil’s articles of association, the AGM must be held by the end of June each year. Notice of the meeting and documents relating to the AGM are published on Statoil's website and notice is sent to all shareholders with known addresses at least 21 days prior to the meeting. All shareholders who are registered in the Norwegian Central Securities Depository (VPS) will receive an invitation to the AGM. Other documents relating to Statoil's AGMs will be made available on Statoil's website. A shareholder may nevertheless request that documents that relate to matters to be dealt with at the AGM be sent to him/her.

 

Shareholders are entitled to have their proposals dealt with at the AGM if the proposal has been submitted in writing to the board of directors in sufficient time to enable it to be included in the notice of meeting, i.e. no later than 28 days before the meeting. Shareholders who are unable to attend may vote by proxy.

 

As described in the notice of the general meeting, shareholders may vote in writing, including through electronic communication, for a period before the general meeting.

 

The deadline for registration for the AGM in Statoil is the day before the AGM is due to take place.

The AGM is normally opened and chaired by the chair of the corporate assembly. If there is a dispute concerning individual matters and the chair of the corporate assembly belongs to one of the disputing parties, or is for some other reason not perceived as being impartial, another person will be appointed to chair the AGM. This is in order to ensure impartiality in relation to the matters to be considered. As Statoil has a large number of shareholders with a wide geographicalgeographic distribution, Statoil offers shareholders the opportunity to follow the AGM by webcast.

 

The following matters are decided at the AGM:


·          Approval of the board of directors' report, the financial statements and any dividend proposed by the board of directors and recommended by the corporate assembly

·          Election of the shareholders' representatives to the corporate assembly and approval of the corporate assembly's fees

·          Election of the nomination committee and approval of the nomination committee's fees

·          Election of the external auditor and approval of the auditor's fee

·          Any other matters listed in the notice convening the AGM

 

All shares carry an equal right to vote at general meetings. Resolutions at general meetings are normally passed by simple majority. However, Norwegian company law requires a qualified majority for certain resolutions, including resolutions to waive preferential rights in connection with any share issue, approval of a merger or demerger, amendment of the articles of association or authorisation to increase or reduce the share capital. Such matters require the approval of at least two-thirds of the aggregate number of votes cast as well as two-thirds of the share capital represented at the general meeting.

 

If shares are registered by a nominee in the Norwegian Central Securities Depositary (VPS), cf. section 4-10 of the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, and the beneficial shareholder wants to vote for their shares, the beneficial shareholder must re-register the shares in a separate VPS account in their own name prior to the general meeting. If the holder can prove that such steps have been taken and that the

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015127


holder has a de facto shareholder interest in the company, the holder may, incompany will allow the company's opinion,shareholder to vote for the shares. Decisions regarding voting rights for shareholders and proxy holders are made by the person opening the meeting, whose decisions may be reversed by the general meeting by simple majority vote.

 

The minutes of the AGM are made available on Statoil’s website immediately after the AGM.

 

As regards to extraordinary general meetings (EGM), an EGM will be held in order to consider and decide a specific matter if demanded by the corporate assembly, the chair of the corporate assembly, the auditor or shareholders representing at least 5% of the share capital. The board must ensure that an EGM is held within a month of such demand being submitted.

 

In the following, certain types of resolutions by the general meeting of shareholders are outlined:

 

New share issues

If Statoil issues any new shares, including bonus shares, the articles of association must be amended. This requires the same majority as other amendments to the articles of association. In addition, under Norwegian law, the shareholders have a preferential right to subscribe for new shares issued by Statoil. The preferential right to subscribe for an issue may be waived by a resolution of a general meeting passed by the same percentage majority as required to approve amendments to the articles of association. The general meeting may, with a majority as described above, authorise the board of directors to issue new shares, and to waive the preferential rights of shareholders in connection with such share issues. Such authorisation may be effective for a maximum of two years, and the par value of the shares to be issued may not exceed 50% of the nominal share capital when the authorisation was granted.

The issuing of shares through the exercise of preferential rights to holders who are citizens or residents of the USA may require Statoil to file a registration statement in the USA under US securities laws. If Statoil decides not to file a registration statement, these holders may not be able to exercise their preferential rights.

 

Right of redemption and repurchase of shares

Statoil’s articles of association do not authorise the redemption of shares. In the absence of authorisation, the redemption of shares may nonetheless be decided upon by a general meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds majority on certain conditions. However, such share redemption would, for all practical purposes, depend on the consent of all shareholders whose shares are redeemed.

 

A Norwegian company may purchase its own shares if authorisation to do so has been granted by a general meeting with the approval of at least two-thirds of the aggregate number of votes cast as well as two-thirds of the share capital represented at the general meeting. The aggregate par value of such treasury shares held by the company must not exceed 10% of the company's share capital, and treasury shares may only be acquired if, according to the most recently adopted balance sheet, the company's distributable equity exceeds the consideration to be paid for the shares. Pursuant to Norwegian law, authorisation by the general meeting cannot be granted for a period exceeding 18 months.

 

Distribution of assets on liquidation

Under Norwegian law, a company may be wound up by a resolution of the company's shareholders at a general meeting passed by both a two-thirds majority of the aggregate votes cast and a two-thirds majority of the aggregate share capital represented at the general meeting. The shares are ranked equally in the event of a return on capital by the company upon winding up or otherwise.

 

7.4

3.3 Nomination committee

Pursuant to Statoil's articles of association, the nomination committee shall consist of four members who are shareholders or representatives of shareholders. The duties of the nomination committee are set forth in the articles of association, and the instructions for the committee are adopted by the general meeting of shareholders.

1042Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

The committee is independent of both the board of directors and the company's management.

 

The duties of the nomination committee are to submit recommendations to:

·          theThe annual general meeting for the election of shareholder-elected members and deputy members of the corporate assembly, and the remuneration of members of the corporate assembly

·          theThe annual general meeting for the election and remuneration of members of the nomination committee

·          theThe corporate assembly for the election of shareholder-elected members of the board of directors and remuneration of the members of the board of directors and

·          theThe corporate assembly for the election of the chair and deputy chair of the corporate assembly

 

Using a form on Statoil’s website,The nomination committee would like to ensure that the shareholders’ views are taken into consideration when candidates to the governing bodies of Statoil ASA are proposed. The nomination committee invites in writing Statoil's largest shareholders canto propose shareholder-elected candidates for the board of directors, the corporate assembly and the board of directors, as well as members of the nomination committee. The shareholders are also invited to provide input to the nomination committee in respect of the composition and competence of Statoil's governing bodies in light of Statoil's strategies and challenges going forward. The deadline for providing input is normally set to early January in order to secure that the response is taken into account in the upcoming nominations. In addition, all shareholders have an opportunity to submit proposals through an electronic mailbox as described on Statoil’s website. In the board nomination process, the board shares with the nomination committee the results from the annual, normally externally facilitated board evaluation with input from both management and the board. Separate meetings are held between the nomination committee and each board member, including employee-elected board members. The chair of the board and the chief executive officer are invited, without having the right to vote, to attend at least one meeting of the nomination committee before it makes its final recommendations. The committee regularly utilises external expertise in its work.

 

The members of the nomination committee are elected by the annual general meeting. The chair of the nomination committee and one other member are elected from among the shareholder-elected members of the corporate assembly. Members of the nomination committee are normally elected for a term of two years.

128Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

Personal deputy members for one or more of the nomination committee's members may be elected in accordance with the same criteria as described above. A deputy member normally only meets for the permanent member if the appointment of that member terminates before the term of office has expired.

 

The membersStatoil's nomination committee consists of the nomination committee are:following members as per 31 December 2017 and are elected for the period up to the annual general meeting in 2018:

·          Olaug SvarvaTone Lunde Bakker (chair), Managing director at FolketrygdfondetGeneral Manager, Swedbank Norge (also chair of Statoil’s corporate assembly)

·          Tom Rathke, Group executive vice president Wealth Management at DnBAdvisor to the CEO of DNB ASA

·          Elisabeth Berge, Secretary general,General, Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (personal deputy for Elisabeth Berge is Bjørn Ståle Haavik, Director, Department of Economic and Administrative Affairs, at the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy)

·          Tone Lunde Bakker, Global headJarle Roth, CEO of cashArendals Fossekompani ASA (also a member of Statoil’s corporate assembly)

The board considers all members of the nomination committee to be independent of Statoil's management at Danske Bankand board of directors. The general meeting decides the remuneration of the nomination committee.

 

The nomination committee held 1914 ordinary meetings and three2 telephone meetings in 2015.2017.

 

The instructions for the nomination committee including the rules of procedure, are available at Statoil.com/nominationcommittee.www.statoil.com/nominationcommittee

 

7.53.4 Corporate assembly

Pursuant to the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, companies with more than 200 employees must elect a corporate assembly unless otherwise agreed between the company and a majority of its employees.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015129


Name

Occupation

Place of residence

Year of birth

Position

Family relations to corporate executive committee, board or corporate assembly members

Share ownership for members as of 31.12.2015

Share ownership for members as of 08.03.2016

First time elected

Expiration date of current term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Olaug Svarva

Managing director, Folketrygdfondet

Oslo

1957

Chair, Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2007

2016

Idar Kreutzer

CEO, Finance Norway (FNO)

Oslo

1962

Deputy chair, Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2007

2016

Karin Aslaksen

Head of HR department, the National Police Directorate of Norway

Hosle

1959

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2008

2016

Greger Mannsverk

Managing director, Kimek AS

Kirkenes

1961

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2002

2016

Steinar Olsen

CEO, Jemso A/S

Stavanger

1949

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2007

2016

Tone Cathrine Lunde Bakker

Global head of cash management at Danske Bank

Oslo

1962

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2014

2016

Ingvald Strømmen

Dean at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

Ranheim

1950

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2006

2016

Rune Bjerke

President and CEO, DNB ASA

Oslo

1960

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2007

2016

Barbro Hætta

Medical doctor, University Hospital of North Norway

Harstad

1972

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2010

2016

Siri Kalvig

Associate professor, University of Stavanger

Stavanger

1970

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2010

2016

Terje Venold

Independent advisor with various directorships

Bærum

1950

Shareholder-elected

No

500

500

2014

2016

Kjersti Kleven

Co-owner of John Kleven AS

Ulsteinvik

1967

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2014

2016

Brit Gunn Ersland

Union representative, Tekna. Specialist Reservoir Tech.

Bergen

1960

Employee-elected

No

1,567

1,802

2011

2017

Steinar Kåre Dale

Union representative, NITO, SR Analyst

Mongstad

1961

Employee-elected

No

2,424

2,710

2013

2017

Per Martin Labråten

Union representative, Industri Energi. Production technician

Brevik

1961

Employee-elected

No

599

803

2007

2017

Anne K.S. Horneland

Union representative, Industri Energi

Hafrsfjord

1956

Employee-elected

No

4,575

4,902

2006

2017

Jan-Eirik Feste

Union representative, YS

Lindås

1952

Employee-elected

No

862

1,088

2008

2017

Hilde Møllerstad

Union representative, Tekna/NITO

Oslo

1966

Employee-elected

No

2,595

3,034

2013

2017

Per Helge Ødegård

Union representative, Lederne. Discipl resp operation process 

Porsgrunn

1963

Employee-elected, observer

No

816

1,023

1994

2017

Dag-Rune Dale

Union representative, Industri Energi, Safety officer

Kollsnes

1963

Employee-elected, observer

No

2,787

3,058

2013

2017

Sun Lehmann

Union representative, Tekna

Trondheim

1972

Employee-elected, observer

No

2,867

3,237

2015

2017

Total

 

 

 

 

 

19,592

22,157

 

 

130Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


An election of the employee-elected members of the corporate assembly was held early 2015. Effective as of 28 April 2015, Brit Gunn Ersland was elected as new member (from the former position as an observer), Sun Lehmann was elected as a new observer and Oddvar Karlsen, Jorunn Birkeland and Sten Atle Jølle were elected as new deputy members of the corporate assembly. Eldfrid Irene Hognestad (member) left the corporate assembly as of the same date. The number of deputy members for the employee-elected members of the corporate assembly was also reduced from 17 to 11 deputy members.

 

Pursuant toIn accordance with Statoil's articles of association, the corporate assembly normally consists of 18 members. Twelve members, with12 of whom (with four deputy membersmembers) are nominated by the nomination committee and elected atby the annual general meetingmeeting. They represent a broad cross-section of the company's shareholders and sixstakeholders. Six members, with deputy members, and three observers and deputy members are elected by and from among theour employees. Such employees are non-executive personnel.The corporate assembly elects its own chair and deputy chair from and among its members.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017105


Members of the corporate assembly are normally elected for a term of two years. Members of the board of directors and the general managermanagement cannot be members of the corporate assembly, but they are entitled to attend and to speak at meetings of the corporate assembly unless the corporate assembly decides otherwise in individual cases.All members of the corporate assembly live in Norway. Members of the corporate assembly do not have service contracts with the company or its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of office.

An overview of the members and observers of the corporate assembly as of 31 December 2017 follows below.

1062Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Name

Occupation

Place of residence

Year of birth

Position

Family relations to corporate executive committee, board or corporate assembly members

Share ownership for members as of 31.12.2017

Share ownership for members as of 14.03.2018

First time elected

Expiration date of current term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tone Lunde Bakker

General Manager Swedbank Norge

Oslo

1962

Chair, Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2014

2018

Nils Bastiansen

Executive director of equities in Folketrygdfondet

Oslo

1960

Deputy chair, Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2016

2018

Jarle Roth

CEO, Arendals Fossekompani ASA

Bærum

1960

Shareholder-elected

No

43

43

2016

2018

Greger Mannsverk

Managing director, Kimek AS

Kirkenes

1961

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2002

2018

Steinar Olsen

CEO, Jemso A/S

Stavanger

1949

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2007

2018

Kathrine Næss

Plant manager at the aluminium smelter at Alcoa Mosjøen

Mosjøen

1979

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2016

2018

Ingvald Strømmen

Professor at the Faculty of Engineering at Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Ranheim

1950

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2006

2018

Rune Bjerke

President and CEO, DNB ASA

Oslo

1960

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2007

2018

Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal

CEO of Golden Ocean Management AS, managing the dry bulk shipping company Golden Ocean Group Ltd

Oslo

1977

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2016

2018

Siri Kalvig

Associate professor, University of Stavanger

Stavanger

1970

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2010

2018

Terje Venold

Independent advisor with various directorships

Bærum

1950

Shareholder-elected

No

544

544

2014

2018

Kjersti Kleven

Co-owner of John Kleven AS

Ulsteinvik

1967

Shareholder-elected

No

0

0

2014

2018

Steinar Kåre Dale

Union representative, NITO, SR Analyst. Prin Analyst IT Infrastr.

Mongstad

1961

Employee-elected

No

2072

2351

2013

2019

Anne K.S. Horneland

Union representative, Industri Energi. Employee Representative RIR.

Hafrsfjord

1956

Employee-elected

No

5722

6049

2006

2019

Hilde Møllerstad

Union representative, Tekna. Proj Leader Petech.

Oslo

1966

Employee-elected

No

3642

4091

2013

2019

Terje Enes

Union representative, SAFE. Discipl Resp Maint Mech.

Stavanger

1958

Employee-elected

No

2464

2674

2017

2019

Lars Olav Grøvik

Union representative, Tekna. Advisor Petech.

Bergen

1961

Employee-elected

No

5775

6172

2017

2019

Dag-Rune Dale

Union representative, Industri Energi, Safety officer. Employee representative O&M.

Kollsnes

1963

Employee-elected

No

3918

4179

2017

2019

Per Helge Ødegård

Union representative, Lederne. Discipl resp operation process. 

Porsgrunn

1963

Employee-elected, observer

No

554

425

1994

2019

Sun Lehmann

Union representative, Tekna. Leading Engineer IT.

Trondheim

1972

Employee-elected, observer

No

4383

4756

2015

2019

Dag Unnar Mongstad

Union representative, Industri Energi. Operator Ops Labratory.

Bergen

1954

Employee-elected, observer

No

1722

1745

2017

2019

Total

 

 

 

 

 

30,839

33,029

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017107


An election of the employee-elected members of the corporate assembly was held early 2017. As of 26 April 2017, Terje Enes and Lars Olav Grøvik were elected as new members. Dag-Rune Dale became a new member and Dag Unnar Mongstad became a new observer in June 2017 replacing former corporate assembly member Per Martin Labråten who was elected as a new board member. Tove Bjordal, Peter B. Sabel, Thor-Ole Vågene, Mina Helene Aase, Kine Merethe Pedersen, Katrine Knarvik-Skogstø and Jan-Eirik Feste (Feste from the former position as member) were elected as new deputy members.

The number of deputy members for the employee-elected members of the corporate assembly was also reduced from 11 to 10 as a result of Per Martin Labråten’s election to the board of directors.

 

The duties of the corporate assembly are defined in section 6-37 of the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act. The corporate assembly elects the board of directors and the chair of the board.board and can vote separately on each nominated candidate. Its responsibilities also include overseeing the board and the CEO's management of the company, making decisions on investments of considerable magnitude in relation to the company's resources, and making decisions involving the rationalisation or reorganisation of operations that will entail major changes in or reallocation of the workforce.

 

Statoil's corporate assembly held four ordinary meetings in 2015.2017. The chair of the board participated at all four meetings, and the CEO at three meetings (with the CFO acting on his behalf at one meeting). Other members of management were also present at the meetings.

 

All membersThe procedure for the work of the corporate assembly, live in Norway. Membersas well as an updated overview of the corporate assembly do not have service contracts with the company or its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of office.members, is available at www.statoil.com/corporateassembly.

  

1082Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    131


 

7.6

3.5 Board of directors



Pursuant to Statoil's articles of association, the board of directors consists of between nine and 11 members.members elected by the corporate assembly. The management is not represented onchair of the board.

board and the deputy chair of the board are also elected by the corporate assembly. At present, Statoil's board of directors consists of 10 members. As required by Norwegian company law, the company's employees are entitled to be represented by three board members.

The employee-elected board members, but not the shareholder-elected board members, have three deputy members who attend board meetings in the event an employee-elected member of the board is unable to attend. The management is not represented on the board of directors. Members of the board are elected for a term of up to two years, normally for one year at a time. There are no board member service contracts that provide for benefits upon termination of office. Statoil's

The board considers its composition to be diverse and competent with respect to the expertise, capacity and diversity appropriate to attend to the company's goals, main challenges, and the common interest of all shareholders. The board also deems its composition to be made up of individuals who are willing and able to work as a team, resulting in the board working effectively as a collegiate body. At least one board member qualifies as "audit committee financial expert", as defined in the US Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. Statoil’s board of directors has determined that, in its judgment, all of the shareholder representatives on the board except for Wenche Agerup, are considered independent.

The Four board members are women and three board members are non-Norwegians resident outside of directors of Statoil ASA is responsible for the overall management of the Statoil group, and for supervising the group's activities in general.

The board of directors handles matters of major importance or of an extraordinary nature. However, it may require the management to refer any matter to it. The board of directors appoints the president and chief executive officer (CEO), and stipulates the job instructions, powers of attorney and terms and conditions of employment for the president and CEO.

The board of directors has three sub-committees - the "audit committee", "the safety, sustainability and ethics committee", and "the compensation and executive development committee".Norway.

 

The board held eight ordinary board meetings and fourthree extraordinary meetings in 2015.2017. Average attendance at these board meetings was 95.9%95,41%.

Further information about the members of the board and its sub-committees, including information about expertise, experience, other directorships, independence, share ownership and loans, is available below as well as on our website at www.statoil.com/board which is regularly updated.

Members of the board of directors as of 31 December 2015:2017:


Øystein Løseth

Øystein Løseth 

Position: Shareholder-elected chair of the board and chair of the board's compensation and executive committee.

Born: 1958

Term of office: Member of the board of directors of Statoil ASA since 1 October 2014, and since 1 July 2015, also chair of the board and chair of the board’s compensation and executive development committee. Up for election in 2016.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: Chair of the board of Eidsiva Energi AS.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 1,000 

Loans from Statoil: None 

Experience: In the period 2010 - 2014, Løseth was the CEO and before that First Senior Executive Vice President (since 2009), of Vattenfall AB. In the period 2003 – 2009, Løseth worked for NUON, a Dutch energy company, first as Division Managing Director, then as a Managing Director and the CEO, from 2006 and 2008 respectively. From 2002 to 2003, Løseth was the Head of Production, Business Development and R&D of Statkraft. In addition, he has other extensive management experience from Statkraft and Statoil, within strategy and business development among others.

Education: Løseth graduated as M.Sc. from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and has a degree in Economics from BI Norwegian School of Management in Bergen.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Løseth participated in eight ordinary board meetings, four extraordinary board meetings, three meetings of the compensation and executive development committee, four meetings of the audit committee and one meeting in the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Løseth is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Roy Franklin

Roy Franklin

Born: 1953 

Position: Shareholder-elected deputy chair of the board, chair of the board’s safety, sustainability and ethics committee and member of the board’s audit committee.

Term of office: Deputy chair of the board of Statoil ASA from 1 July 2015. Franklin was also previously a member of the board of StatoilHydro from October 2007 and Statoil from November 2009 until June 2013. Up for election in 2016.

Independent: Yes 

Other directorships: Non-executive chair of the board of Keller Group plc, a London-based international engineering company and Cuadrilla Resources Holdings Limited, a privately held UK company focusing on unconventional energy sources. Board member of the Australian oil and gas company Santos Ltd, the private equity firm Kerogen Capital Ltd and the London-based international engineering company Amec Foster Wheeler.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: None 

Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

ExperienceFranklin has broad experience from management positions in several countries, including positions with BP, Paladin Resources plc and Clyde Petroleum plc.

Education: Franklin has a Bachelor of Science in Geology from the University of Southampton, UK.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Franklin participated in four ordinary board meetings, three meetings of the audit committee and two meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Franklin is a UK citizen and resident in UK.

Bjørn Tore Godal

Bjørn Tore Godal

Born: 1945 

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board, the board's compensation and executive development committee and the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA from 1 September 2010. Up for election in 2016.

Independent: Yes 

Other directorships: Chair of the Council of the Norwegian Defence University College (NDUC), and vice chair of the board of the Fridtjof Nansen Institute (FNI).

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: None 

Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

ExperienceGodal was a member of the Norwegian parliament for 15 years during the period 1986-2001. At various

times, he served as minister for trade and shipping, minister for defense, and minister of foreign affairs for a total of eight

years between 1991 and 2001. From 2007-2010, Godal was special adviser for international energy and climate issues at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From 2003-2007, Godal was Norway's ambassador to Germany and from 2002-2003 he was senior adviser at the department of political science at the University of Oslo.

Education: Godal has a bachelor of arts degree in political science, history and sociology from the University of Oslo.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Godal participated in eight ordinary board meetings, three extraordinary board meetings, seven meetings of the compensation and executive development committee and five meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Godal is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Jakob Stausholm

Jakob Stausholm

Born: 1968 

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board and chair of the board's audit committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since July 2009. Up for election in 2016.

IndependentYes

Other directorshipsNo

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 50,000

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Chief strategy and transformation officer of Maersk Line, the largest container shipping company in the world and part of A.P. Moller - Maersk Group. From 2008 to 2011, Stausholm was chief financial officer of the global facility services provider ISS A/S. Before joining ISS's corporate executive committee, he was employed by the Shell Group for 19 years and held a number of management positions, including vice president finance for the group's exploration and production in Asia and the Pacific, chief internal auditor and CFO of group subsidiaries.

Education: M.Sc. in economics from the University of Copenhagen.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Stausholm participated in eight ordinary board meetings, four extraordinary board meetings and six meetings of the audit committee. Stausholm is a Danish citizen and resident in Denmark.

Maria Johanna Oudeman

Maria Johanna Oudeman

Born: 1958

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board and member of the board’s compensation and executive development committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 15 September 2012. Up for election in 2016.

Independent: Yes 

Other directorships: Oudeman is a member of the boards of Solvay SA, Het Concertgebouw, Rijksmuseum and SHV Holdings.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: None

Loans from Statoil: None 

Experience: Oudeman is the President of Utrecht University in the Netherlands, one of Europe's leading

universities. From 2010 to 2013, Oudeman was a member of the Executive Committee of Akzo Nobel, responsible for HR and Organisational Development. Akzo Nobel is the world's largest paint and coatings company and major producer of specialty chemicals, with operations in more than 80 countries. Before joining Akzo Nobel, she was Executive

Director Strip Products Division at Corus Group, now Tata Steel Europe. Oudeman has extensive experience as a line manager in the steel industry and considerable international business experience.

Education: Oudeman has a law degree from Rijksuniversiteit Groningen in the Netherlands and an MBA in business administration from the University of Rochester, New York, USA and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Oudeman participated in eight ordinary board meetings, four extraordinary board meetings, six meetings of the compensation and executive development committee and one meeting of the board’s safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Oudeman is a Dutch citizen and resident in the Netherlands.

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

Born: 1970 

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board and the board's audit committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 19 March 2015 Up for election in 2016.

IndependentYes

Other directorshipsMember of the board of directors of DNV holding, DNV Foundation, DNV GL and member of the committee for tax and capital in the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: None

Loans from Statoil: None

ExperienceSince 2012, Herlofsen has been the Chief Financial Officer in the Norwegian shipping company Torvald Klaveness. She has broad financial and strategic experience from several corporations and board directorships. Herlofsen’s professional career began in the leading Nordic Investment Bank, Enskilda Securities, where she worked with corporate finance from 1995 to 1999 in Oslo and London. During the next ten years Herlofsen worked in the Norwegian shipping comp any Bergesen d.y. ASA (later BW Group). During her period with Bergesen d.y. ASA/BW Group Herlofsen held leading positions within M&A, strategy and corporate planning and was part of the group management team. 

Education: MSc in Economics and Business Administration (Siviløkonom) and Certified Financial Analyst Program, the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH). Breakthrough Program for Top Executives at IMD business school, Switzerland.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Herlofsen participated in six ordinary board meetings, one extraordinary board meeting and four meetings of the audit committee. Herlofsen is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Wenche Agerup

Wenche Agerup

Born: 1964 

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board, the board’s compensation and executive development committee and the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 21 August 2015. Up for election in 2016.

IndependentNo.

Pursuant to the NYSE rules, a director will not be considered independent under the NYSE rules if the director is, or was within the past three years, an executive officer of another company at which any of the listed company's current executive officers are, or were within the past three years, members of the compensation committee. This rule also applies to foreign listed companies. Agerup was a member of Norsk Hydro ASA’s management team while Irene Rummelhoff, Executive Vice President of New Energy Solutions in Statoil, was member of the board’s compensation committee in Norsk Hydro. Agerup is therefore deemed as a non-independent board member in Statoil for a period of three years from 31 December 2014, i.e. until 31 December 2017.

Other directorshipsAgerup is a member of the board of the seismic company TGS ASA.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 2,423

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Agerup is an Executive Vice President and the Chief Corporate Affairs Officer in Telenor ASA. Agerup was the Executive Vice President for Corporate Staffs and the General Counsel of Norsk Hydro ASA from 2010 to 31 December 2014. She has held various executive roles in Hydro since 1997, including within the company’s M&A-activities, the business area Alumina, Bauxite and Energy, as a plant manager at Hydro’s metal plant in Årdal and as a project director for a Joint Venture in Australia where Hydro cooperated with the Australian listed company UMC.

Education: MA in Law from the University of Oslo, Norway (1989) and a Master of Business Administration from Babson College, USA (1991).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Agerup participated in three ordinary board meetings, three meetings of the compensation and executive development committee and two meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Agerup is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Lill-Heidi Bakkerud

Lill-Heidi Bakkerud

Born: 1963

Position: Employee-elected member of the board and member of the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA from 1998 to 2002, and again since 2004. Up for election in 2017.

Independent: No

Other directorships: Bakkerud is a member of the executive committee of the Industry Energy (IE) trade union and holds a number of offices as a result of this.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 330
Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Bakkerud has worked as a process technician at the petrochemical plant in Bamble and on the Gullfaks field in the North Sea. She is now a full-time employee representative as the leader of the union Industri Energi’s Statoil branch. 

Education:Bakkerud has a craft certificate as a process/chemistry worker. 

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2015, Bakkerud participated in eight ordinary board meetings, four extraordinary board meetings and five meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Bakkerud is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

Born: 1964 

Position: Employee-elected member of the board and member of the board's audit committee.

Term of office: Member of board of directors of Statoil ASA from 1 July 2013. Up for election in 2017.

Independent: No 

Other directorships: Board member of First Scandinavia, Montanus AS and member of Tekna's central nomination committee.

Number of shares held in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 2,845

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Di Valerio has been employed by Statoil since 2005, and works within materials discipline for Technology, Projects & Drilling. Di Valerio was the union Tekna's main representative in Statoil from 2008 to 2013. She also sat on Tekna's central committee from 2005 to 2013.

Education: Chartered engineer (mathematics and physics) from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim (NTNU).

Familiy relations: No family relationships to other board members, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other: In 2015, di Valerio participated in eight ordinary board meetings, four extraordinary board meetings and six meetings of the audit committee. Di Valerio is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Stig Lægreid

Stig Lægreid

Born: 1963

Position: Employee-elected member of the board and member of the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of directors of Statoil ASA from 1 July 2013. Up for election in 2017.

Independent: No 

Other directorships: Member of The Norwegian society for Engineers and Technologists’ (NITO) negotiation committee for private sector.

Number of shares held in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 1,519

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Employed in ÅSV and Norsk Hydro since 1985. Mainly occupied as project engineer and constructor for production of primary metals until 2005 and from 2005 as weight estimator for platform design. He is now a full-time employee representative as the leader of the union NITO, Statoil.

Education: Bachelor degree, mechanical construction from OIH.

Family relations: No family relationships to other board members, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other: In 2015, Lægreid participated in eight ordinary board meetings, four extraordinary board meetings and five meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Lægreid is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

In addition, there are four employee-elected deputy members of the board who attend board meetings in the event an employee-elected member of the board is unable to attend.

Jon Erik Reinhardsen

Born: 1956

Position: Shareholder-elected chair of the board and chair of the board's compensation and executive development committee.

Term of office: Chair of the board of Statoil ASA since 1 September 2017. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: Member of the board of directors of Oceaneering International, Inc., Borregaard ASA, Telenor ASA and Awilhelmsen AS.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 2,558

Loans from Statoil: None
Experience: Reinhardsen was the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) from 2008 – August 2017. PGS delivers global geophysical- and reservoir services. The company has its headquarters in Oslo and offices in 17 countries with approximately 1,800 employees.  In the period 2005 – 2008 Reinhardsen was President Growth, Primary Products in the international aluminium company Alcoa Inc. with headquarters in the US, and he was in this period based in New York.

From 1983 to 2005, Reinhardsen held various positions in the Aker Kværner group, including Group Executive Vice President of Aker Kværner ASA, Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President of Aker Kværner Oil & Gas AS in Houston and Executive Vice President in Aker Maritime ASA.

Education: Reinhardsen has a Master’s Degree in Applied Mathematics and Geophysics from the University of Bergen. He has also attended the International Executive Program at the Institute for Management Development (IMD) in Lausanne, Switzerland.

132Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017109


Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017 Reinhardsen participated inthree ordinary board meetings, twoextraordinary board meetings, twomeetings of the compensation and executive development committee and one meeting of the audit committee. Reinhardsen is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.


Roy Franklin

Born: 1953

Position: Shareholder-elected deputy chair of the board, chair of the board’s safety, sustainability and ethics committee and member of the board’s audit committee.

Term of office: Board member and deputy chair of the board of Statoil ASA since 1 July 2015. Franklin was also previously a member of the board of StatoilHydro from October 2007 and Statoil from November 2009 until June 2013. Chair of the board’s safety, sustainability and ethics committee and member of the board’s audit committee. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: Non-executive chair of the boards of Premier Oil plc, Cuadrilla Resources Holdings Limited, a privately held UK company focusing on unconventional energy sources and Eregean Israel Ltd., a private company focused on gas development offshore Israel. Board member of the private equity firm Kerogen Capital Ltd and the Aberdeen-based international engineering company Wood plc.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: None

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

Experience: Franklin has broad oil and gas experience from management positions in several countries, including positions with BP, Paladin Resources plc and Clyde Petroleum plc.

Education: Franklin has a Bachelor of Science in Geology from the University of Southampton, UK.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Franklin participated in eight ordinary board meetings, two extraordinary board meetings, one meeting in the compensation and executive development committee, six meetings of the audit committee and five meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Franklin is a UK citizen and resident in UK.


Bjørn Tore Godal

Born: 1945

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board, the board's compensation and executive development committee and the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 1 September 2010. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: Vice chair of the board of the Fridtjof Nansen Institute (FNI).

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: None

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

1102   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


Experience: Godal was a member of the Norwegian parliament for 15 years during the period 1986-2001. At various

times, he served as minister for trade and shipping, minister for defense and minister of foreign affairs for a total of eight years between 1991 and 2001. From 2007-2010, Godal was special adviser for international energy and climate issues at the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From 2003-2007, Godal was Norway's ambassador to Germany and from 2002-2003 he was senior adviser at the department of political science at the University of Oslo. From 2014-2016, Godal led a government-appointed committee responsible for the evaluation of the civil and military contribution from Norway in Afghanistan in the period 2001 - 2014.

Education: Godal has a bachelor of arts degree in political science, history and sociology from the University of Oslo.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Godal participated in eightordinary board meetings,three extraordinary board meetings, six meetings of the compensation and executive development committee and five meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Godal is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.


Maria Johanna Oudeman

Born: 1958

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board and member of the board’s compensation and executive development committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 15 September 2012. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: Oudeman is a member of the boards of Het Concertgebouw, Rijksmuseum, Solvay SA, SHV Holdings NV and Aalberts Industries NV.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: None

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Oudeman was the President of Utrecht University in the Netherlands, one of Europe's leading universities, until June 2017. From 2010 to 2013, Oudeman was a member of the Executive Committee of Akzo Nobel, responsible for HR and Organisational Development. Akzo Nobel is the world's largest paint and coatings company and major producer of specialty chemicals, with operations in more than 80 countries. Before joining Akzo Nobel, she was Executive Director Strip Products Division at Corus Group, now Tata Steel Europe. Oudeman has extensive experience as a line manager in the steel industry and considerable international business experience.

Education: Oudeman has a law degree from Rijksuniversiteit Groningen in the Netherlands and an MBA in business administration from the University of Rochester, New York, USA and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Oudeman participated ineight ordinary board meetings, three extraordinary board meetings and six meetings of the compensation and executive development committee. Oudeman is a Dutch citizen and resident in the Netherlands.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017111



Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

Born: 1970

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board and the board's audit committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 19 March 2015. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: None

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: None

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: In April 2017 Herlofsen took on a new position as Chief Financial Officer in Wallenius Willhelmsen Logistics ASA, an international shipping company. Before joining WWL ASA she was the Chief Financial Officer in the shipping company Torvald Klaveness since 2012. She has broad financial and strategic experience from several corporations and board directorships. Herlofsen’s professional career began in the Nordic Investment Bank, Enskilda Securities, where she worked with corporate finance from 1995 to 1999 in Oslo and London. During the next ten years Herlofsen worked in the Norwegian shipping company Bergesen d.y. ASA (later BW Group). During her period with Bergesen d.y. ASA/BW Group Herlofsen held leading positions within M&A, strategy and corporate planning and was part of the group management team. 

Education: MSc in Economics and Business Administration (Siviløkonom) and Certified Financial Analyst Programme (AFA), the Norwegian School of Economics (NHH). Breakthrough Programme for Top Executives at IMD business school, Switzerland.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Herlofsen participated in eight ordinary board meetings, three extraordinary board meeting and six meetings of the audit committee. Herlofsen is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.


Wenche Agerup

Born: 1964

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board, the board’s compensation and executive development committee and the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 21 August 2015. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: Agerup is a member of the board of the seismic company TGS ASA and a member of Det Norske Veritas Council and its nomination committee.

1122Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 2,650
Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Agerup is an Executive Vice President (Corporate Affairs) and General Counsel in Telenor ASA. Agerup was the Executive Vice President for Corporate Staffs and the General Counsel of Norsk Hydro ASA from 2010 to 31 December 2014. She has held various executive roles in Hydro since 1997, including within the company’s M&A-activities, the business area Alumina, Bauxite and Energy, as a plant manager at Hydro’s metal plant in Årdal and as a project director for a Joint Venture in Australia where Hydro cooperated with the Australian listed company UMC.

Education: MA in Law from the University of Oslo, Norway (1989) and a Master of Business Administration from Babson College, USA (1991).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Agerup participated in eight ordinary board meetings, three extraordinary board meetings, six meetings of the compensation and executive development committee and four meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Agerup is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.


Jeroen van der Veer

Born: 1947

Position: Shareholder-elected member of the board and chair of the board's audit committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 18 March 2016. Up for election in 2018.

Independent: Yes

Other directorships: van der Veer is the chair of the supervisory boards of ING Bank NV and Royal Philips Electronics, chair of the supervisory council of Technical University of Delft and Platform Beta Techniek, chair of the advisory board of the Rotterdam Climate Initiative as well as a board member in Boskalis Westminster Groep NV and Het Concertgebouw.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: None

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: van der Veer was the Chief Executive Officer in the international oil and gas company Royal Dutch Shell Plc (Shell) in the period 2004 to 2009 when he retired. van der Veer thereafter continued as a non-executive director on the board of Shell until 2013. He started to work for Shell in 1971 and has experience within all sectors of the business and has significant competence within corporate governance.

Education: van der Veer has a degree in Mechanical Engineering (MSc) from Delft University of Technology, Netherlands and a degree in Economics (MSc) from Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Since 2005 he holds an honorary doctorate from the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, van der Veer participated in seven ordinary board meetings, two extraordinary board meetings and six meetings of the audit committee. van der Veer is a Dutch citizen and resident in the Netherlands



Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017113


Per Martin Labråten
Born:
1961

Position: Employee-elected member of the board and member of the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 8 June 2017. Up for election in 2019.

Independent: No

Other directorships: Labråten is a member of the executive committee of the Industry Energy (IE) trade union and holds a number of offices as a result of this.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 1,343
Loans from Statoil: None

Experience:Labråten has worked as a process technician at the petrochemical plant on Oseberg field in the North Sea. Labråten is now a full-time employee representative as the leader of IE Statoil branch.

Education:Labråten has a craft certificate as a process/chemistry worker.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the board, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Labråten participated in four ordinary board meetings, one extraordinary board meeting and one meeting of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Labråten is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.


Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

Born:1964 

Position:Employee-elected member of the board and member of the board's audit committee.

Term of office:Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 1 July 2013. Up for election in 2019.

Independent:No 

Other directorships:Board member of Tekna's central nomination committee.

Number of shares held in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017:4,471 

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: di Valerio has been employed by Statoil since 2005, and works within materials discipline for Technology, Projects & Drilling. di Valerio was the union Tekna's main representative in Statoil from 2008 to 2013. She also sat on Tekna's central committee from 2005 to 2013.

Education: Chartered engineer (mathematics and physics) from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim (NTNU).

Familiy relations: No family relationships to other board members, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, di Valerio participated in eight ordinary board meetings, three extraordinary board meetings and six meetings of the audit committee. di Valerio is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

1142Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017



Stig Lægreid

Born: 1963

Position: Employee-elected member of the board and member of the board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee.

Term of office: Member of the board of Statoil ASA since 1 July 2013. Up for election in 2019.

Independent: No 

Other directorships: Member of The Norwegian society for Engineers and Technologists’ (NITO) negotiation committee for private sector.

Number of shares held in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 1,975

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Employed in ÅSV and Norsk Hydro since 1985. Mainly occupied as project engineer and constructor for production of primary metals until 2005 and from 2005 as weight estimator for platform design. He is now a full-time employee representative as the leader of the union NITO, Statoil.

Education: Bachelor degree, mechanical construction from OIH.

Family relations: No family relationships to other board members, members of the corporate executive committee or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: In 2017, Lægreid participated in eight ordinary board meetings, three extraordinary board meetings and five meetings of the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. Lægreid is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

The most recent changes to the composition of the board of directors was the election of Jon Erik Reinhardsen as the new shareholder-elected chair effective as of 1 September 2017 after the former shareholder-elected chair Øystein Løseth resigned effective as of 30 June 2017. Deputy chair Roy Franklin acted as chair of the board between 1 July and 31 August 2017. Employee-elected member Per Martin Labråten was elected as of 8 June 2017, replacing Lill Heidi Bakkerud. Reinhardsen replaced Løseth as chair of the board’s compensation and executive development committee as per 5 September 2017.

The work of the board of directors

The board is responsible for managing the Statoil group and for monitoring day-to-day management and the group's business activities. This means that the board is responsible for establishing control systems and for ensuring that Statoil operates in compliance with laws and regulations, with our values as stated in The Statoil Book, the Code of Conduct, as well as in accordance with the owners' expectations of good corporate governance. The board emphasises the safeguarding of the interests of all shareholders, but also the interests of Statoil's other stakeholders.

The board handles matters of major importance, or of an extraordinary nature, and may in addition require the management to refer any matter to it. An important task for the board is to appoint the chief executive officer (CEO) and stipulate his/her job instructions and terms and conditions of employment.

The board has adopted a generic annual plan for its work which is revised with regular intervals. Recurrent items on the board's annual plan are: security, safety, sustainability and climate, corporate strategy, business plans, quarterly and annual results, annual reporting, ethics, management's monthly performance reporting, management compensation issues, CEO and top management leadership assessment and succession planning, project status review, people and organisation strategy and priorities, an annual enterprise risk management review, two yearly discussions of main risks and risk issues and an annual review of the board's governing documentation. In the beginning of each board meeting, the CEO meets separately with the board to discuss key matters in the company. At the end of all board meetings, the board has a closed session with only board members attending the discussions and evaluating the meeting.

The work of the board is based on rules of procedure that describe the board's responsibilities, duties and administrative procedures, and determines which cases are to be handled by the board. The rules of procedure also determine the handling of matters in which individual board members or a closely related party have a major personal or financial interest. The rules of procedure further describe the duties of the CEO and his/her duties vis-à-vis the board of directors. The board's rules of procedure are available on our website at www.statoil.com/board. In addition to the board of directors, the CEO, the CFO, the COO, the senior vice president for communication, the general counsel and the company secretary attend all board meetings. Other members of the executive committee and senior management attend board meetings by invitation in connection with specific matters.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017115


 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015133New members of the board are offered an induction programme where meetings with key members of the management are arranged, an introduction to Statoil’s business is given and relevant information about the company and the board’s work is made available through the company’s web based board portal.


 

7.6.1 The board carries out an annual board evaluation, with input from various sources and as a main rule with external facilitation. The evaluation report is discussed in a board meeting and is made available to the nomination committee as input to the committee’s work.

The entire board, or part of it, regularly visits several Statoil locations in Norway and globally, and a longer board trip for all board members to an international location is made at least on a biannual basis. When visiting Statoil locations globally, the board emphasises the importance of improving its insight into, and knowledge about, safety and security in Statoil’s operations, Statoil's technical and commercial activities as well as the company's local organisations. In 2017, whole or parts of the board visited Statoil’s operations in London, Brazil and USA as well as, in Norway, the Oseberg Field and yards in Stord and Haugesund.

Statoil's board has established three sub-committees: the audit committee; the compensation and executive development committee; and the safety, sustainability and ethics committee. The committees prepare items for consideration by the board and their authority is limited to making such recommendations. The committees consist entirely of board members and are answerable to the board alone for the performance of their duties. Minutes of the committee meetings are sent to the whole board, and the chair of each committee regularly informs the board at board meetings about the committee's work. The composition and work of the committees are further described below.

Audit committee

The board of directors elects at least three of its members to serve on the board of directors' audit committee and appoints one of them to act as chair. The employee-elected members of the board of directors may nominate one audit committee member.

 

At year-end 2015,2017, the audit committee members were Jakob StausholmJeroen van der Veer (chair), Roy Franklin, Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen and Ingrid di Valerio (employee-elected board member).

 

The audit committee is a sub-committee of the board of directors, and its objective is to act as a preparatory body in connection with the board's supervisory roles with respect to financial reporting and the effectiveness of the company's internal control system. It also attends to other tasks assigned to it in accordance with the instructions for the audit committee adopted by the board of directors. The audit committee is instructed to assist the board of directors in its supervising of matters such as:

·          Approving the internal audit plan on behalf of the board of directors

·Monitoring the financial reporting process, including oil and gas reserves, fraudulent issues and reviewing the implementation of accounting principles and policies

·          Monitoring the effectiveness of the company's internal control, internal audit and risk management systems

·          Maintaining continuous contact with the statutoryexternal auditor regarding the annual and consolidated accounts

·          Reviewing and monitoring the independence of the company's internal auditor and the independence of the statutoryexternal auditor, reference is made to the Norwegian Auditors Act chapter 4, and, in particular, whether services other than audits provided by the statutoryexternal auditor or the audit firm are a threat to the statutoryexternal auditor's independence

 

The audit committee supervises implementation of and compliance with the group's Code of Conduct in relation to financial reporting.

 

The internal audit functionCorporate Audit reports directlyadministratively to the president and CEO of Statoil and functionally to the chair of the board of directors and to the chief executive officer.directors’ audit committee.

 

Under Norwegian law, the external auditor is appointed by the shareholders at the annual general meeting based on a proposal from the corporate assembly. The audit committee issues a statement to the annual general meeting relating to the proposal.

 

The audit committee meets at least five times a year and it meets separatelyboth the board and the board’s audit committee hold meetings with the internal auditor and the external auditor on a regular basis.basis without the company’s management being present.

 

The audit committee is also charged with reviewing the scope of the audit and the nature of any non-audit services provided by external auditors. The external auditors report directly to the audit committee on a regular basis.

 

The audit committee is tasked with ensuring that the company has procedures in place for receiving and dealing with complaints received by the company regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters, and procedures for the confidential and anonymous submission, via the group's ethics helpline, by company employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters, as well as other matters regarded as being in breach of the group's Code of Conduct, a material violation of an applicable US federal or state securities law, a material breach of fiduciary duties or a similar material violation of any other US or Norwegian statutory provision. The audit committee is designated as the company's qualified legal compliance committee for the purposes of section 307Part 205 in Title 17 of the Sarbanes-Oxley ActU.S. Code of 2002.Federal Regulations.

 

1162Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


In the execution of its tasks, the audit committee may examine all activities and circumstances relating to the operations of the company. In this regard, the audit committee may request the chief executive officer or any other employee to grant it access to information, facilities and personnel and such assistance as it requests. The audit committee is authorised to carry out or instigate such investigations as it deems necessary in order to carry out its tasks and it may use the company's internal audit or investigation unit, the external auditor or other external advice and assistance. The costs of such work will be covered by the company.

 

The audit committee is only responsible to the board of directors for the execution of its tasks. The work of the audit committee in no way alters the responsibility of the board of directors and its individual members, and the board of directors retains full responsibility for the audit committee's tasks.

 

The audit committee held six meetings in 2015.2017. There was 96.3%100% attendance at the committee's meetings.



The board of directors has decided that a member of the audit committee, Jakob Stausholm,Jeroen van der Veer, qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert", as defined in

Item 16A of Form 20-F. The board of directors has also concluded that Jakob Stausholm,Jeroen van der Veer, Roy Franklin and Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen are independent within the meaning of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act.

 

The committee's mandate is available at Statoil.com/www.statoil.com/auditcommittee

 

134Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


7.6.2 Compensation and executive development committee

The compensation and executive development committee is a sub-committee of the board of directors that assists the board in matters relating to management compensation and leadership development.

The main responsibilities of the compensation and executive development committee are:

 

(1) as a preparatory body for the board, to make recommendations to the board in all matters relating to principles and the framework for executive rewards, remuneration strategies and concepts, the CEO's contract and terms of employment, and leadership development, assessments and succession planning;

 

(2) to be informed about and advise the company's management in its work on Statoil's remuneration strategy for senior executive and in drawing up appropriate remuneration policies for senior executives; and

 

(3) to review Statoil's remuneration policies in order to safeguard the owners' long-term interests.

 

The committee consists of up to four board members. At year-end 2015,2017, the committee members were Øystein LøsethJon Erik Reinhardsen (chair), Bjørn Tore Godal, Maria Johanna Oudeman and Wenche Agerup. All of the committee members are non-executive directors. All members except for Wenche Agerup, are deemed independent.

 

The committee held sevensix meetings in 20152017 and attendance was 96%100%.

 

For a more detailed description of the objective and duties of the compensation and executive development committee, please see the instructions for the compensation committee available at Statoil.com/www.statoil.com/compensationcommittee.

 

7.6.3 Safety, sustainability and ethics committee

The safety, sustainability and ethics committee is a sub-committee of the board of directors that assists the board in matters relating to safety, sustainability and ethics.

 

TheAt year-end 2017, the safety, sustainability and ethics committee (the committee) iswas chaired by Roy Franklin and the other members are Bjørn Tore Godal, Wenche Agerup, Stig Lægreid (employee-elected board member) and Lill-Heidi BakkerudPer Martin Labråten (employee-elected board member).

 

In its business activities, Statoil is committed to comply with applicable laws and regulations and to act in an ethical, environmental, safe and socially responsible manner. The committee has been established to support our commitment in this regard, and it assists the board of directors in its supervision of the company's safety, sustainability and ethics policies, systems and principles with the exception of aspects related to “financial matters”.

 

Establishing and maintaining a committee dedicated to safety, sustainability and ethics is intended to ensure that the board of directors has a strong focus on and knowledge of these complex, important and constantly evolving areas. The committee acts as a preparatory body for the board of directors and, among other things, monitors and assesses the effectiveness, development and implementation of policies, systems and principles in the areas of safety, sustainability and ethics, with the exception of aspects related to “financial matters”. The committee also reviews the annual Sustainability Report.

 

The committee held five meetings in 2015,2017, and attendance was 100%96%.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017117


For a more detailed description of the objective, duties and composition of the committee, please see the instructions for the committee available at Statoil.com/ssecommittee.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015135


7.7 Compliance with NYSE listing rules


Statoil's primary listing is on the Oslo Børs, but Statoil is also registered as a foreign private issuer with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

American Depositary Shares represent the company's ordinary shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). While Statoil's corporate governance practices follow the requirements of Norwegian law, Statoil is also subject to the NYSE's listing rules.

As a foreign private issuer, Statoil is exempted from most of the NYSE corporate governance standards that domestic US companies must comply with. However, Statoil is required to disclose any significant ways in which its corporate governance practices differ from those applicable to domestic US companies under the NYSE rules. A statement of differences is set out below:

Corporate governance guidelines

The NYSE rules require domestic US companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. Statoil's corporate governance principles are developed by the management and the board of directors, in accordance with the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance and applicable law. Oversight of the board of directors and management is exercised by the corporate assembly.

Director independence

The NYSE rules require domestic US companies to have a majority of "independent directors". The NYSE definition of an "independent director" sets out five specific tests of independence and also requires an affirmative determination by the board of directors that the director has no material relationship with the company.

Pursuant to Norwegian company law, Statoil's board of directors consists of members elected by shareholders and employees. Statoil's board of directors has determined that, in its judgment, all of the shareholder-elected directors, except one, are independent. In making its determinations of independence, the board focuses inter alia on there not being any conflicts of interest between shareholders, the board of directors and the company's management, but it does not explicitly make its determination based on the NYSE's five specific tests. The directors elected from among Statoil's employees would not be considered independent under the NYSE rules because they are employees of Statoil. None of the employee-elected directors is an executive officer of the company.

For further information about the board of directors see section 7.6 Board of directors.

Board committees

Pursuant to Norwegian company law, managing the company is the responsibility of the board of directors. Statoil has an audit committee, a safety, sustainability and ethics committee and a compensation and executive development committee. They are responsible for preparing certain matters for the board of directors. The audit committee and the compensation and executive development committee operate pursuant to charters that are broadly comparable to the form required by the NYSE rules. They report on a regular basis to, and are subject to, continuous oversight by the board of directors.

For further information about the board’s sub-committees, see sections 7.6.1 Audit Committee, 7.6.2 Compensation and executive development committee and 7.6.3 Safety, sustainability and ethics committeewww.statoil.com/ssecommittee.

 

Statoil complies with the NYSE rule regarding the obligation to have an audit committee that meets the requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

As required by Norwegian company legislation, the members of Statoil's audit committee include an employee-elected director. Statoil relies on the exemption provided for in Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iv)(C) from the independence requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the employee-elected director. Statoil does not believe that its reliance on this exemption will materially adversely affect the ability of the audit committee to act independently or to satisfy the other requirements of Rule 10A-3 relating to audit committees. The other members of the audit committee meet the independence requirements under Rule 10A-3.

Among other things, the audit committee evaluates the qualifications and independence of the company's external auditor.3.6 ManagementHowever, in accordance with Norwegian law, the auditor is elected by the annual general meeting of the company's shareholders.

136Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Statoil does not have a nominating/corporate governance sub-committee formed from its board of directors. Instead, the roles prescribed for a nominating/corporate governance committee under the NYSE rules are principally carried out by the corporate assembly and the nomination committee which is elected by the general meeting of shareholders. NYSE rules require the compensation committee of US companies to comprise independent directors under the NYSE rules, recommend senior management remuneration and make a determination on the independence of advisors when engaging them. Statoil, as foreign private issuer, is exempt from complying with these rules and is permitted to follow its home country regulations. Statoil considers all its compensation committee members to be independent, cf. the discussion on director independence above. Statoil's compensation committee makes recommendations to the board about management remuneration, including that of the CEO. The compensation committee assesses its own performance and has the authority to hire external advisors. The nomination committee, which is elected by the general meeting of shareholders, recommends to the corporate assembly the candidates and remuneration of the board of directors. Also, the nomination committee recommends to the general meeting of shareholders the candidates and remuneration of the corporate assembly and the nomination committee.

Shareholder approval of equity compensation plans

The NYSE rules require that, with limited exemptions, all equity compensation plans must be subject to a shareholder vote. Under Norwegian company law, although the issuance of shares and authority to buy back company shares must be approved by Statoil's annual general meeting of shareholders, the approval of equity compensation plans is normally reserved for the board of directors.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015137


7.8 Management

The president and CEO has overall responsibility for day-to-day operations in Statoil and appoints the corporate executive committee (CEC). Each of the members of the CEC is head of a separate business area or staff function.

The president and CEO has overall responsibility for day-to-day operations in Statoil. The president and CEO is responsible for developing Statoil's business strategy and presenting it to the board of directors for decision, for the execution of the business strategy and for cultivating a performance-driven, value-basedvalues-based culture.

 

The president and CEO appoints the corporate executive committee. Members of the CEC have a collective duty to safeguard and promote Statoil's corporate interests and to provide the president and CEO with the best possible basis for deciding the company's direction, making decisions and executing and following up business activities. In addition, each of the CEC members is head of a separate business area or staff function.

Members of Statoil's corporate executive committee as of
31 December 2015:2017:





Eldar Sætre,
President and CEO

Eldar Sætre

Born: 1956

Position: President and chief executive officer (CEO) of Statoil ASA since 15 October 2014.

External offices: Member of the board of Strømberg Gruppen AS and Trucknor AS.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 56,896

Loans from Statoil: None
Experience: Sætre joined Statoil in 1980. Executive vice president and CFO from October 2003 until December 2010. Executive vice president for Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP) from 2011 until 2014.

Education: MA in business economics from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Sætre is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.



Hans Jakob Hegge,
Chief financial
officer (CFO)

Hans Jakob Hegge

1182Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Born: 1969
Position: Executive vice president and chief financial officer (CFO) of Statoil ASA since 1 August 2015.

External offices: None

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 32,104

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Hegge has held several managerial positions in Statoil, including senior vice president (SVP) for Operations North in Development & Production Norway (DPN) (2013-2015), SVP for Operations East (2011-2013) in DPN, SVP for Operational Development in DPN (2009-2011) and SVP for Global Business Services in Chief Financial Officer area (CFO) (2005-2009). From 1995 to 2004 he held various positions in DPN, Natural Gas business area and corporate functions in Statoil.

Education: Master of Science degree from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.
Other matters: Hegge is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.





Jannicke Nilsson

Chief operating officer (COO)

Jannicke Nilsson

Born: 1965
Position: Executive vice president and chief operating officer (COO) of Statoil ASA since 1 December 2016.

External offices: Member of the board of Odfjell SE

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 38,491 

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Jannicke Nilsson joined Statoil in 1999 and has held a number of central management positions within upstream operations Norway, including senior vice president for Technical Excellence in Technology, Projects & Drilling, senior vice president for Operations North Sea, vice president for modifications and project portfolio Bergen and platform manager at Oseberg South. In August 2013, she was appointed programme leader for Statoil technical efficiency programme (STEP), responsible for a project portfolio delivering yearly efficiency gains of 3.2 billion USD from 2016.

Education: MSc in cybernetics and process automation and a BSc in automation from the Rogaland Regional College/University of Stavanger.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.
Other matters:Nilsson is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.






Lars Christian Bacher,
Executive vice president Development & Production International (DPI)

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017119


Lars Christian Bacher

Born: 1964
Position: Executive vice president Development & Production International (DPI) of Statoil ASA since 1 September 2012.
External offices: None

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 23,309

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

ExperienceBacher joined Statoil in 1991 and has held a number of leading positions in Statoil, including that of platform manager on the Norne and Statfjord fields on the Norwegian continental shelf. He was in charge of the merger process involving the offshore installations of Norsk Hydro and Statoil. Bacher has also been senior vice president for Gullfaks operations and subsequently for the Tampen area. His most recent position, which he held from September 2009, was as senior vice president for Statoil's Canadian operations within DPI.

Education: Master of science in chemical engineering from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH). He also holds a business degree in Finance from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, the board of directors or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Bacher is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.



Torgrim Reitan,
Executive vice president Development & Production USA (DPUSA)

Torgrim Reitan

Born:1969
Position: Executive vice president Development & Production USA (DPUSA) of Statoil ASA since 1 August 2015.

External offices: None

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 36,235

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: From 1 January 2011 to 1 August 2015 Reitan held the position as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Statoil (CFO). He has held several managerial positions in Statoil, including senior vice president (SVP) in trading and operations in the Natural Gas business area (2009 - 2010), SVP in performance management and analysis (2007 - 2009) and SVP in performance management, tax and M&A (2005 - 2007). From 1995 to 2004, Reitan held various positions in the Natural Gas business area and corporate functions in Statoil.

Education: Master of science degree from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (Siviløkonom) (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.
Other matters: Reitan is a Norwegian citizen and resident in the United States.


John Knight,
Executive vice president
Global Strategy & Business
Development (GSB)

1202Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


John Knight
Born: 1958

Position: Executive vice president Global Strategy & Business Development (GSB) of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2011.

External offices: Member on the advisory board of the Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy in New York and member of the advisory board of Lloyd’s Register. Chair of ONS 18 Conference Committee in Stavanger, Norway.

Numbers of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 109,901

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

Experience: Knight held several central managerial positions in International Operations in Statoil since 2002, mainly in business development. Between 1987 and 2002, Knight held various positions in energy investment banking. From 1977 to 1987, he qualified and worked as a barrister/lawyer, and was employed by Shell Petroleum in London during the period 1980-1987.

Education: Knight has first and post-graduate degrees in law from Cambridge University and the Inns of Court School of Law in London.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Knight is a British citizen and resident in England.

 

Eldar Sætre, President and CEO

Eldar Sætre

Born

:
1956 

PositionPresident and chief executive officer of Statoil ASA since 15 October 2014.

External officesMember of the board of Strømberg Gruppen AS and Trucknor AS.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 201539,130

Loans from StatoilNoneTim Dodson.
Experience: Sætre joined Statoil in 1980. Executive vice president, and CFO from October 2003 until December 2010. Exploration (EXP)

Tim Dodson
Born: 1959
Position: Executive vice president Exploration (EXP) of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2011.

External offices: None
Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 34,425

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

Experience: Dodson has worked in Statoil since 1985 and held central management positions in the company, including the positions of senior vice president for Global Exploration, Exploration & Production Norway and the Technology arena.

Education: Bachelor’s degree of science in geology and geography from the University of Keele.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Dodson is a British citizen and resident in Norway.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017121









Margareth Øvrum.
Executive vice president for Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP) from 2011 until 2014.Technology, Projects & Drilling (TPD)

Margareth Øvrum

Born: 1958

Position: Executive vice president Technology, Projects & Drilling (TPD) of Statoil ASA since September 2004.

External offices: Member of the board of Alfa Laval (Sweden) and FMC Corporation (US).

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 56,125

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Øvrum has worked for Statoil since 1982 and has held central management positions in the company, including the position of executive vice president for Health, Safety and the Environment and executive vice president for Technology & Projects. Øvrum was the company's first female platform manager, on the Gullfaks field. She was senior vice president for operations for Veslefrikk and vice president of Operations Support for the Norwegian continental shelf.

Education: Master's degree in engineering (sivilingeniør) from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH), specialising in technical physics.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Øvrum is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Education

MA in business economics from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) in Bergen.

Family relations:
No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Sætre is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Hans Jakob Hegge, Chief financial
 officer (CFO)

Hans Jakob Hegge

Born: 1969
Position:
Arne Sigve Nylund,
Executive vice president and chief financial officer (CFO) of Statoil ASA since 1 August 2015.

External offices: None 

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 22,854 

Loans from Statoil: None 

Experience: Hegge has held several managerial positions in Statoil, including Senior Vice President (SVP) for Operations North in Development and& Production Norway (DPN) (2013-2015), SVP for Operations East (2011-2013) in DPN, SVP for Operational Development in DPN (2009-2011) and SVP for Global Business Services in Chief Financial Officer area (CFO) (2005-2009). From 1995 to 2004 he held various positions in DPN, Natural Gas business area and corporate functions in Statoil.

Education: Master of Science degree from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.
Other matters: Hegge is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Arne Sigve Nylund

Born: 1960

Position: Executive vice president Development & Production Norway (DPN) of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2014.

External offices: Member of the board of directors of The Norwegian Oil & Gas Association (Norsk Olje & Gass).

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 13,354

Loans from Statoil: None

Experience: Nylund was employed by Mobil Exploration Inc. from 1983-1987. Since 1987, he has held several central management positions in Statoil.

Education: Mechanical engineer from Stavanger College of Engineering with further qualifications in operational technology from Rogaland Regional College/University of Stavanger (UiS). Business graduate of the Norwegian School of Business and Management (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Nylund is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

1222Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Anders Opedal, Chief operating
officer (COO)

Anders Opedal

Born

:
1968


Jens Økland,
Position:

Executive vice president and chief operating officer (COO) of Statoil ASA since 1 AprilMarketing, Midstream & Processing (MMP)

Jens Økland

Born: 1969

Position: Executive vice president Marketing, Midstream & Processing (MMP) of Statoil ASA since 1 June 2015.

External offices: None 

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 17,207 

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

Experience: Økland joined Statoil in 1994 and has mainly worked in the mid and downstream areas. Before becoming executive vice president of MMP, Økland worked as vice president of operations for the Åsgard area in Development & Production Norway. Previously Økland was senior vice president of Statoil’s natural gas portfolio and supply business in North America, marketing and developing infrastructure solutions for equity and non-equity production. Before heading up Statoil’s downstream gas division in North America, he had senior marketing and business development positions within natural gas in Europe mainly focusing on Germany, Statoil’s largest gas market.

Education: MSc in business from BI Norwegian Business School.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Økland is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.








Irene Rummelhoff,

External offices: None Executive vice president New Energy Solutions (NES)

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 14,511 

Loans from Statoil: None 

Experience: Opedal joined Statoil in 1997 as a petroleum engineer in the Statfjord operations. He has held a range of positions in Drilling and well, Procurement and projects. In 2011 Opedal took on the role as Senior Vice President for Projects in Technology, Projects and Drilling (TPD) responsible for Statoil’s approximately NOK 300 billion project portfolio. Before joining Statoil, Opedal worked for Schlumberger and Baker Hughes.

Education: MBA from Heriot-Watt University and an engineering degree from NTH

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.
Other matters: Opedal

Irene Rummelhoff

Born: 1967

Position: Executive vice president New Energy Solutions (NES)of Statoil ASA since 1 June 2015.

External offices: Deputy chair of the board of directors of Norsk Hydro ASA.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2017: 25,081 

Loans from Statoil ASA: None

Experience: Rummelhoff joined Statoil in 1991. She has held a number of management positions within international business development, exploration and the downstream business in Statoil.

Education: Master’s degree in petroleum geosciences from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Rummehoff is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

 

 

138Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Lars Christian Bacher, Executive vice president Development and Production International (DPI)

Lars Christian Bacher

Born: 1964
Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 September 2012.
External offices: None

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 21,116
Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

Experience: Bacher joined Statoil in 1991 and has held a number of leading positions in Statoil, including that of platform manager on the Norne and Statfjord fields on the Norwegian continental shelf. He was in charge of the merger process involving the offshore installations of Norsk Hydro and Statoil. Bacher has also been senior vice president for Gullfaks operations and subsequently for the Tampen area. His most recent position, which he held from September 2009, was as senior vice president for Statoil's Canadian operations in Development & Production USA (DPUSA).

Education: Master of science in chemical engineering from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH). He also holds a master's degree in finance from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the corporate executive committee, the board of directors or       the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Bacher is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Torgrim Reitan, Executive vice
president Development and Production
USA (DPUSA)

Torgrim Reitan

Born: 1969
Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2011.

External offices: None 

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015:28,482 

Loans from Statoil: None 

Experience: From 1 January 2011 to 1 August 2015 Reitan held the position as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Statoil (CFO). He has held several managerial positions in Statoil, including senior vice president (SVP) in trading and operations in the Natural Gas business area (2009 - 2010), SVP in performance management and analysis (2007 - 2009) and SVP in performance management, tax and M&A (2005 - 2007). From 1995 to 2004, Reitan held various positions in the Natural Gas business area and corporate functions in Statoil.

Education: Master of science degree from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.
Other matters: Reitan is a Norwegian citizen and resident in the United States.

John Knight, Executive vice president
Global Strategy and Business
Development (GSB)

John Knight
Born: 1958 

Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2011.

External offices: Member on the advisory board of the Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy in New York.  Chair of ONS16 Conference Committee in Stavanger, Norway and member on the advisory board of Imperial College Business School MsC Climate Change Management and Finance in London.

Numbers of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 85,731

Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

Experience: Knight held several central managerial positions in International Operations in Statoil since 2002, mainly in business development. Between 1987 and 2002, Knight held various positions in energy investment banking. From 1977 to 1987, he qualified and worked as a barrister/lawyer, and was employed by Shell Petroleum in London during the period 1985-1987.

Education: Knight has first and post-graduate degrees in law from Cambridge University and the Inns of Court School of Law in London.

Family relationsNo family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other mattersKnight is a British citizen and resident in England.

Tim Dodson. Executive vice president, Exploration (EXP)

Tim Dodson
Born: 1959
Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2011.

External offices: None
Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 28,614

Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

Experience: Dodson has worked in Statoil since 1985 and held central management positions in the company, including the positions of senior vice president for global exploration, Exploration & Production Norway and the technology arena.

EducationMaster of science in geology and geography from the University of Keele.

Family relationsNo family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other mattersDodson is a British citizen and resident in Norway.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015139


Margareth Øvrum. Executive vice

president Technology, Projects and

Drilling (TPD)

Margareth Øvrum

Born: 1958 

PositionExecutive vice president of Statoil ASA since September 2004.

External officesMember of the board of Atlas Copco AB (Sweden) and Alfa Laval (Sweden).

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 42,621 

Loans from Statoil: None 

ExperienceØvrum has worked for Statoil since 1982 and has held central management positions in the company, including the position of executive vice president for health, safety and the environment and executive vice president for Technology & Projects. Øvrum was the company's first female platform manager, on the Gullfaks field. She was senior vice president for operations for Veslefrikk and vice president of operations support for the Norwegian continental shelf.

Education: Master's degree in engineering (sivilingeniør) from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) in Trondheim, specialising in technical physics.

Family relationsNo family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other mattersØvrum is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Arne Sigve Nylund, Executive vice

president Development and production Norway (DPN)

Arne Sigve Nylund

Born: 1960 

Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 January 2014.

External offices:Member of the board of directors of The Norwegian Oil & Gas Association (Norsk Olje & Gass).

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 9,261

Loans from Statoil: None 

Experience: Employed by Mobil Exploration Inc. from 1983-1987. Since 1987, Nylund has held several central management positions in Statoil ASA.

Education: Mechanical engineer from Stavanger College of Engineering with further qualifications in operational technology from Rogaland Regional College/University of Stavanger (UiS). Business graduate of the Norwegian School of Business and Management (NHH).

Family relations:No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Nylund is a Norwegian citizen and is resident in Norway.

Jens Økland, executive vice president Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP)

Jens Økland

Born: 1969 

Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 June 2015.

External offices: None 

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 10,735 

Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

Experience: Økland joined Statoil in 1994 and has mainly worked in the midstream and downstream sectors. Before becoming executive vice president of MMP, Økland worked as vice president of operations for the Åsgard area in Development and Production Norway. Åsgard ranks among the largest developments on the Norwegian continental shelf, supplying about 11 billion cubic metres of gas annually to Europe. Previously Økland was senior vice president of Statoil’s natural gas portfolio and supply business in North America, marketing and developing infrastructure solutions for equity and non-equity production. Before heading up Statoil’s downstream gas division in North America, he had senior marketing and business development positions within natural gas in Europe mainly focusing on Germany, Statoil’s largest gas market.

Education: MSc in business from BI Norwegian Business School.

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Økland is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

Irene Rummelhoff, executive vice

president New Energy Solutions (NES)

Irene Rummelhoff

Born: 1967 

Position: Executive vice president of Statoil ASA since 1 June 2015.

External offices: Member of the board of directors of Norsk Hydro ASA.

Number of shares in Statoil ASA as of 31 December 2015: 17,082 

Loans from Statoil ASA: None 

Experience: Rummehoff joined Statoil in 1991. She has held a number of management positions within international business development, exploration, and the downstream business in Statoil.

Education: Master’s degree in petroleum geosciences from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH).

Family relations: No family relations to other members of the CEC, members of the board or the corporate assembly.

Other matters: Rummehoff is a Norwegian citizen and resident in Norway.

140Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015141


 

Statoil has granted loans to the Statoil-employed spouse of certain of the Executive Vice Presidentsexecutive vice presidents as part of its general loan arrangement for Statoil employees. Employees in salary grade 12 or higher may take out a car loan from Statoil in accordance with standardised provisions set by the company. The standard maximum car loan is limited to the cost of the car, including registration fees, but not exceeding NOK 300,000. Employees outside the collective labour area are entitled to a car loan up to NOK 575,000 (vice presidents and senior vice presidents) or NOK 475,000 (other positions). The car loan is interest-free, but the tax value, "interest advantage", must be reported as salary. Permanent employees in Statoil ASA may also apply for a consumer loan up to NOK 300.000.350.000. The interest rate on consumer loans is corresponding to the standard rate in effect at any time for “reasonable loans” from employer as decided by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, i.e. the lowest rate an employer may offer without triggering taxation of the advantage for the employee.

 

1421242   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

7.93.7 Compensation to governing bodies

This section describes the compensationRemuneration to the board of directors

The remuneration of the board and its sub-committees is decided by the corporate executive committeeassembly, based on a recommendation from the nomination committee. The members have an annual, fixed remuneration, except for deputy members (only elected for employee-elected board members) who receive remuneration per meeting attended. Separate rates are set for the board's chair, deputy chair and other members, respectively. Separate rates are also adopted for the board's sub-committees, with similar differentiation between the chair and the corporate assembly.other members of each committee. The employee-elected members of the board receive the same remuneration as the shareholder-elected members.

The board receives its remuneration by cash payment. Board members from outside Scandinavia and outside Europe, respectively, receive separate travel allowances for each meeting attended. The remuneration is not linked to the board members' performance, option programmes or similar. None of the shareholder-elected board members have a pension scheme or agreement concerning pay after termination of their office with the company. If shareholder-elected members of the board and/or companies they are associated with should take on specific assignments for Statoil in addition to their board membership, this will be disclosed to the full board.

 

In 2015,2017, the aggregate compensationtotal remuneration to the corporate assemblyboard, including fees for the board's three sub-committees, was NOK 1,047,143,6,278,638 (USD 759,846).

Detailed information about the individual remuneration to the members of the board of directors NOK 5,950,035 andin 2017 is provided in the table below.

Members of the board (figures in USD thousand except number of shares)

Total

remuneration

Share ownership as of 31 December 2017

 

 

 

Jon Erik Reinhardsen (chair of the board)1)

37

2,558

Øystein Løseth (chair of the board)2)

52

n.a.

Roy Franklin (deputy chair of the board)3)

118

-

Wenche Agerup

67

2,650

Bjørn Tore Godal

67

-

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

63

-

Maria Johanna Oudeman

89

-

Jeroen van der Veer

88

-

Per Martin Labråthen4)

33

1,343

Lill-Heidi Bakkerud 5)

25

n.a.

Stig Lægreid

57

1,975

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

63

4,471

 

 

 

Total

760

12,997

 

 

 

1) Chair from September 1, 2017

 

 

2) Chair until June 30, 2017 (resigned)

 

 

3) Chair between July 1 and August 31, 2017

 

 

4) Member from June 8, 2017

 

 

5) Member until June 7, 2017 (resigned)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017125


Remuneration to the members of the corporate executive committee NOK 87,763,000 (all in rounded figures).assembly

The membersremuneration of the corporate assembly andis decided by the board of directorsgeneral meeting, based on a recommendation from the nomination committee. The members have an annual, fixed remuneration, except for deputy members who receive remuneration per meeting. In addition, boardmeeting attended. Separate rates are set for the corporate assembly’s chair, deputy chair and other members, resident outside of Scandinavia or outside of Europe receive additional travel fees (based on two different travel fee rates) per board meeting attended.respectively. The shareholder-elected and employee-elected members of the corporate assembly and the board are entitled toreceive the same remuneration rates.as the shareholder-elected members. The corporate assembly receives its remuneration by cash payment.

 

Detailed information aboutIn 2017, the individual compensationtotal remuneration to the members ofcorporate assembly was NOK 1,070,497 (USD 129,552).

Remuneration to the board of directors and members ofcorporate executive committee

In 2017, the aggregate remuneration to the corporate executive committee in 2015 is provided in the tables below.

Members of the board (figures in NOK thousand)

Board

of directors

Audit

committee

Compensation and executive development committee

SSE

committee

Total

remuneration

 

 

 

 

 

 

Øystein Løseth1)

 557  

 65  

 65  

 -    

 687  

Svein Rennemo2)

 357  

 -    

 53  

 -    

 410  

Grace Reksten Skaugen3)

 98  

 -    

 27  

 -    

 125  

Jakob Stausholm

 373  

 207  

 -    

 -    

 580  

Bjørn Tore Godal

 373  

 -    

 84  

 93  

 550  

Lill Heidi Bakkerud

 373  

 -    

 -    

 84  

 457  

Maria Johanna Oudeman

 503  

 -    

 84  

 -    

 587  

Catherine Hughes4)

 198  

 -    

 -    

 37  

 235  

James Mulva5)

 307  

 65  

 -    

 -    

 373  

Stig Lægreid

 373  

 -    

 -    

 84  

 457  

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

 373  

 134  

 -    

 -    

 507  

Roy Franklin6)

 261  

 68  

 -    

 65  

 394  

Wenche Agerup7)

 138  

 -    

 31  

 31  

 200  

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen8)

 296  

 91  

 -    

 -    

 387  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

4,580

631

344

395

5,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) Chair of the board from 1 July 2015

 

 

 

 

 

2) Chair of the board until and including 30 June 2015 (resigned)

 

 

 

 

 

3) Deputy chair until and including 18 March 2015 (resigned)

 

 

 

 

 

4) Member until and including 15 April 2015 (resigned)

 

 

 

 

 

5) Member until and including 30 June 2015 (resigned)

 

 

 

 

 

6) Deputy chair from 1 July 2015

 

 

 

 

 

7) Member from 21 August 2015

 

 

 

 

 

8) Member from 19 March 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015was 143NOK 85,556,482 (USD 10,354,122)


 

 

Fixed remuneration

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members of corporate

executive committee                                                                                                     in 2015 (figures in NOK thousand)1)

Fixed pay2)

Cash allowance3)

LTI 4)

Annual

variable pay5)

Taxable

benefits

Taxable

compensation

Non-taxable

benefits

in kind

Estimated

pension

cost6)

Estimated present

value of pension

obligation7). 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eldar Sætre9), 11)

7,748

0

2,492

3,504

421

14,165

0

0

79,699

Hans Jakob Hegge9)

1,349

44

302

324

7

2,025

0

273

7,753

Torgrim Reitan9), 10)

1,881

0

0

1,022

337

3,239

0

979

12,727

Torgrim Reitan - CFO9)

1,890

0

761

0

117

2,769

0

0

0

Lars Christian Bacher

3,266

0

739

843

377

5,226

437

872

14,191

Timothy Dodson

3,695

0

803

789

148

5,435

321

1,109

33,022

Margareth Øvrum

3,805

0

867

1,241

152

6,066

127

0

48,435

Arne Sigve Nylund

3,345

0

725

1,352

146

5,568

0

833

28,586

Jens Økland9)

1,684

41

394

526

11

2,655

0

354

5,669

Tor Martin Anfinnsen9)

1,298

0

281

584

104

2,266

0

390

22,576

Irene Rummelhoff9)

1,563

38

365

395

11

2,371

0

386

7,585

Anders Opedal9)

2,323

44

544

761

11

3,682

0

547

7,540

William Maloney8), 9)

3,933

0

4,625

4,625

1,226

14,410

138

698

0

John Knight2), 8)

8,695

0

3,468

3,468

1,231

16,863

0

0

0

1). All figures in the table are presented on accrual basis.

2)Fixed pay consists of base salary, holiday allowance and other administrative benefits. John Knight's fixed pay also includes a cash supplement that replaces his defined contribution pension plan.

3)Cash allowance in lieu of pension accrual above 12 G (the base amount in the national insurance scheme).

4)The fixed long-term incentive (LTI) element implies an obligation to invest the net amount in Statoil shares. A lock-in periodboard of 3 years applies for the investment. The LTI element is presented the year it is granted for the membersdirectors’ complete declaration on remuneration of the corporate executive committee employed by Statoil ASA. Members of the corporate executive committee employed by non-Norwegian subsidiaries have a LTI scheme deviating from the model used in the parent company. A net amount equivalent to the annual variable pay is used for purchasing Statoil shares.

5)Annual variable pay includes holiday allowance for corporate executive committee (CEC) members resident in Norway.

6)Estimated pension cost for CEC members under defined benefit plans (Eldar Sætre, Timothy Dodson, Margareth Øvrum, Arne Sigve Nylund and Tor Martin Anfinnsen) is calculated based on actuarial assumptions and pensionable salary (mainly base salary) at 31 December 2014 and is recognised as pension cost in the statement of income for 2015. The other CEC members have defined contribution plans including notional contribution plans and the contributions in the reporting period are recognised as pension cost in the statement of income. Payroll tax is not included. For further information, see note 19 Pensions.

7)Torgrim Reitan, Lars Christian Bacher, Hans Jakob Hegge, Jens Økland, Irene Rummelhoff and Anders Opedal were transferred to a defined contribution plan from 1 April 2015. Paid-up policies and rights letters issued in 2015 related to the defined benefit plans as well as the notional contribution plans are included in the present value of pension obligation at 31 December 2015. Estimated present value of pension obligation for the rest of the members of CEC employed by Statoil ASA, are presented with the defined benefit obligation.

8)William Maloney and John Knight's remuneration is in local currency US Dollar and British Pound, respectively. For John Knight the figures in the table are presented in NOK, using average currency rates in 2015. For William Maloney the average currency rates for the period 1 January to 30 September 2015 are used. The change in currency rates during the year, such as strengthening of USD and GBP versus NOK, impacts the development from 2014 to 2015.  William Maloney’s variable compensation is paid in 2015.

9)Eldar Sætre resumed role as acting chief executive officer (CEO) from 15 October 2014 until 3 February 2015. The 4 February Eldar Sætre was appointed as CEO on a permanent basis. Tor Martin Anfinnsen acted as executive vice president for Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP) from 15 October 2014 until 31 May 2015. Jens Økland was appointed executive vice president for MMP from 1 June 2015. William Maloney resigned as executive vice president for Development and Production North America (DPNA) July 31 and was followed by Torgrim Reitan who started as executive vice president for Development and Production USA (DPUSA) 1August 2015. Hans Jakob Hegge was appointed executive vice president and chief financial officer from 1. August 2015. Irene Rummelhoff was appointed executive vice president for the newly established business area New Energy Solutions (NES) on 1 June 2015. Anders Opedal was appointed on 1 April 2015 in the new position chief operating officer (COO).

10)Compensation and benefit including standard international assignment terms for Torgrim Reitan during his tenure as executive vice president in DPUSA, commencing 1 August 2015.  

11)Fixed pay for Eldar Sætre includes fixed remuneration element of NOK 1 815 000 not included in pensionable salarypersonnel follows below.

 

There are no loans from the company to members of the corporate executive committee.

Former chief executive officer Helge Lund has in 2015 paid back NOK 5 033 491 in LTI bonus received in 2012, 2013 and 2014. He has received compensations and benefits that amount to NOK 2.7 million in 2015. The amount is related to base salary for the period 1 January to 8 February 2015 and final settlement payments such as holiday allowance earned in 2014 and 2015. 

  

1441262   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

 

 

Fixed remuneration

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members of corporate

executive committee                                                                                                     in 2014 (figures in NOK thousand)1)

Fixed pay3)

LTI6)

Annual

variable pay7)

Taxable

benefits

in kind

Taxable

compensation

Non-taxable

benefits

in kind

Estimated

pension

cost8)

Estimated present

value of pension

obligation4), 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Helge Lund4), 5), 9)

 5,640  

 2,165  

 -    

 249  

 8,054  

 199  

 6,008  

 73,944  

Torgrim Reitan9)

 3,283  

 761  

 1,066  

 126  

 5,237  

 -    

 879  

 16,339  

Lars Christian Bacher9)

 3,256  

 739  

 1,034  

 363  

 5,393  

 428  

 685  

 15,879  

Timothy Dodson

 3,496  

 803  

 1,124  

 175  

 5,597  

 313  

 1,343  

 32,689  

Margareth Øvrum

 3,779  

 867  

 1,457  

 250  

 6,352  

 98  

 1,349  

 48,701  

Arne Sigve Nylund5)

 2,984  

 725  

 1,421  

 108  

 5,239  

 -    

 773  

 26,646  

Eldar Sætre - CEO5)

 1,370  

 -    

 689  

 35  

 2,094  

 -    

 989  

 46,769  

Eldar Sætre - MMP

 2,685  

 858  

 901  

 143  

 4,588  

 -    

 -    

 -    

Tor Martin Anfinnsen5)

 817  

 -    

 239  

 90  

 1,147  

 -    

 234  

 22,196  

William Maloney2), 8)

 4,333  

 2,167  

 2,167  

 960  

 9,627  

 166  

 713  

 -    

John Knight2), 3)

 7,132  

 2,845  

 2,845  

 1,133  

 13,955  

 -    

 -    

 -    

1)All figures in the table are presented on accrual basis.

2)William Maloney and John Knight's remuneration is in local currency US Dollar and British Pound, respectively. The figures in the table are presented in NOK, using average currency rates in 2014.

3)Fixed pay consist of base salary, holiday allowance and any other administrative benefits. The figures are presented on accrual basis. John Knight's fixed pay also includes a cash supplement that replaces his defined contribution pension plan in 2014.

4)Helge Lund resigned from his position as CEO of Statoil 15 October 2014. Helge Lund has received salary and benefits that amounts to NOK 1.8 million in 2014 after his resignation as chief executive officer, not included in the table above. The pension liability listed in the table above represents the estimated present value of his pension obligation as of 31 December 2014. In line with the company’s LTI policy, resignation during the lock-in period is regarded as a non-fulfilment of the LTI obligations. Following his resignation Helge Lund was obliged to pay back to Statoil a total of NOK 5 033 491, calculated based on the value of the locked shares acquired under the LTI program.

5)Following Helge Lund’s resignation, Eldar Sætre resumed role as acting CEO with immediate effect on 15 October 2014, and Tor Martin Anfinnsen replaced Eldar Sætre as acting executive vice president for Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP). Arne Sigve Nylund replaced Øystein Michelsen from January 2014.

6)The fixed long-term incentive (LTI) element implies an obligation to invest the net amount in Statoil shares. A lock-in period of 3 years applies for the investment. The LTI element is presented the year it is granted for the members of the corporate executive committee employed by Statoil ASA. Members of the corporate executive committee employed by non-Norwegian subsidiaries have a LTI scheme deviating from the model used in the parent company. A net amount equivalent to the annual variable pay is used for purchasing Statoil shares, and the figures are presented on accrual basis.

7)Annual variable pay includes holiday allowance, and is presented on accrual basis.

8)Estimated pension cost is calculated based on actuarial assumptions and pensionable salary (mainly base salary) at 31 December 2013 and is recognised as pension cost in the statement of income for 2014. Payroll tax is not included. William Maloney is employed by a non-Norwegian entity and his pension cost reflects the payment under the entity's defined contribution plan made in 2014.

9)Torgrim Reitan and Lars Christian Bacher was transferred to a defined contribution plan from 1 April 2015, and the Estimated present value of pension obligation per 31 December 2014 reflects this change. Estimated present value of pension obligation related to Helge Lund, Torgrim Reitan and Lars Christian Bacher, are based on the estimated value of paid-up policies and rights letters to be issued in 2015, related to Helge Lund's resignation and the termination of Torgrim Reitan and Lars Christian Bacher's defined benefit pension plan. Estimated present value of pension obligation for the rest of the members of the corporate executive committee employed by Statoil ASA, are presented with the defined benefit obligation.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015145


1Remuneration policy and concept for the accounting year 2016

Reference is made to the document “Statement on remuneration for Statoil’s Corporate Executive Committee”, which is available at www.statoil.com, for a detailed description of the remuneration and remuneration policy for executive management applicable for the years 2015 and 2016. The main elements of Statoil’s executive remuneration are described in the paragraphs below.

1.1Policy and principles

The board of directors has in 2015 decided to introduce several new elements to the company’s executive remuneration concept. The revised governmental guidelines on executive remuneration as of 13 February 2015 (“2015 governmental guidelines”) entailed adjustments with impact on the company’s executive remuneration concept. Changes to the pension system and the long-term incentive scheme are implemented to align with the 2015 governmental guidelines on executive remuneration. In addition the company has initiated improvements to strengthen the link between executive remuneration and the company’s overall performance and results.

The changes include:

·a cap on pension contribution at the maximum limit in the tax-favoured joint pension schemes in Norway (currently 12 G[2] )

·adjustment to the long-term incentive scheme (LTI)

·a company performance modifier

·a threshold for variable pay

These changes are described in section 1.2-1.5 below.

The company performance modifier is subject to approval by the 2016 annual general meeting (AGM) cf. section 5.

Other than described in this section, the company’s established remuneration principles and concepts as described in previous years Statements on remuneration and other employment terms for Statoil’s corporate executive committee will be continued in the accounting year 2016.

The remuneration concept is an integrated part of our values based performance framework. It has been designed to:

·reflect our global competitive market strategy and local market conditions

·strengthen the common interests of employees in the Statoil group and its shareholders

·be in accordance with statutory regulations and good corporate governance

·be fair, transparent and non-discriminatory

·equally reward and recognise “what” we deliver and “how” we deliver

·differentiate on the basis of responsibilities and performance

·reward both short- and long-term contributions and results

1.2Cap on pension contribution at the maximum limit in the tax-favoured joint pension schemes in Norway

In the White Paper no. 27 (2013- 2014) the Government announced changes to its policy relating to pension contribution in companies where the State has majority ownership. The State would no longer support pension contribution above 12 G. This policy change was manifested in 2015 governmental guidelines on executive remuneration. In order to align with the 2015 governmental guidelines, Statoil ASA has introduced a cap at 12 G for pension contribution for new members of the corporate executive committee appointed after the effective date of the 2015 governmental guidelines.

In lieu of pension contribution for income above 12 G, new internal members of the corporate executive committee will be eligible for compensation. The compensation level will be dependent on the candidate’s pension terms and base salary level and will be in the range of 15 – 20% of his/her base salary.

1.3Adjustments to the long-term incentive scheme in Statoil ASA

According to the 2015 governmental guidelines, the long-term incentive (LTI) scheme is defined as variable remuneration. Earlier this was part of the fixed remuneration and included in the basis for calculating the participants’ annual variable pay. This practice will be discontinued with the effect from earning year 2016. The LTI scheme as variable remuneration will have a maximum annual grant at 30% of the participants’ fixed remuneration c.f. section 1.6 below.

1.4Threshold 

The board of directors has decided to introduce a threshold in the reward concept as a pre-requisite for the payment of variable pay and grant of long-term incentive (LTI). The threshold will have effect on the long-term incentive grant in 2016 provided this is not impeded by obligations in individual agreements.  From the earning year 2016 the threshold will be applied on annual variable pay payments in 2017 and onwards.  The threshold is based on Statoil group’s full-year adjusted earnings after tax, requiring that a minimum level of earnings must be achieved for any payments to be made. This minimum level has been set at USD 2 billion. Earnings between USD 2 and 3.3 will result in bonus payments reduced by 50%.  Above USD 3.3 billion the threshold is fully achieved and variable pay payments are not affected. Prior to application of the threshold an  assessment  of the company’s overall performance in relation to the adjusted earnings results shall be made by the board of directors based on recommendations by the board compensation and executive development committee.


[2]The base amount in the Norwegian national insurance scheme, currently NOK 90,068

146Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


1.5Company performance modifier

Subject to approval by the 2016 annual general meeting, a company performance modifier is introduced in the calculations for variable pay schemes from 2016 with subsequent impact on variable pay from 2017 onwards. The company performance modifier determines the proportion of the bonus factor that will be paid, ranging from 50% to 150%. Company performance is assessed against two equally weighted measures: relative total shareholder return (TSR) and relative return on average capital employed (RoACE).

1.6The remuneration concept for the corporate executive committee

Statoil’s remuneration concept for the corporate executive committee consists of the following main elements:

·Fixed remuneration (base salary) and as applicable cash compensation

·Variable pay (annual variable pay (AVP) and long-term Incentive (LTI))

·Benefits (primarily pension, insurance and share savings plan)

Fixed remuneration consists of base salary, and as applicable cash compensation. The cash compensation is applied in lieu of pension contribution above 12 G as described in section 1.2 above or as a fixed remuneration to be competitive in the market.

The variable pay elements for members of the corporate executive committee in the parent company are:

·annual variable pay scheme which has a maximum potential of 50% of fixed remuneration

·LTI scheme with a maximum grant of 30% of fixed remuneration. The LTI grant level is differentiated related to position level. The obligation to invest the net LTI amount in Statoil shares and keep for a lock in period of 3 years will be continued. 

The annual variable pay will be subject to the company performance modifier ref. section 1.5 above. Irrespective of the performance modifier results, the annual variable pay will have a maximum at 50% of the fixed remuneration.

The main benefit programmes applicable to senior executives are the general pension scheme, the insurance scheme and the employee share savings plan. In 2015 Statoil implemented a defined contribution scheme as the new general pension scheme. With the exception of employees who were 15 years or less from regular retirement age at 31th December 2014, all employees have been transferred to the new scheme. The employees exempted from transfer will retain the defined benefit scheme.

Deviations from the general principles outlined below pertaining to one current member and one former member of the corporate executive committee, implemented with effect as of 1 January 2011, are described in the statement on executive remuneration. These deviations have also been described in previous statements on remuneration and other employment terms for Statoil’s corporate executive committee.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015147


The main elements of Statoil’s executive remuneration are described in more detail in the table below.

Main Elementselements - Statoil Executive Remunerationexecutive remuneration

Remuneration Elementelement

Objective

Award level

Performance criteria

Base Salarysalary

Attract and retain the right high-performing individuals providing competitive but not market-leading terms.

We offer base salary levels which are aligned with and differentiated according to the individual's responsibility and performance at aperformance. The level which is competitive in the markets in which we operate.

The evaluation of performance is based on the fulfilment of pre-defined goals; see element Annual Variable Pay below. The base salary is normally subject to annual review.review based on an evaluation of the individual’s performance; see “Annual Variable Pay" below.

Long-Term IncentiveCash compensation

The cash compensation is applied as a supplementing fixed remuneration element to be competitive in the market.

Reference is made to the remuneration table. Four of the executive vice presidents receive a cash compensation in lieu of pension accrual with reference to the section on pension and insurance scheme.

No performance criteria are linked to the cash compensation. The cash compensation is not included in the pensionable income.

Annual variable pay

Encourage a strong performance culture. Reward individuals for annual achievement of business objectives and goals relating to ‘How’ results are delivered.

Members of the corporate executive committee are entitled to annual variable pay ranging from 0 – 50% of their fixed remuneration. Target[10] value is 25%.

The threshold principles and the company performance modifier are applied.

The Company reserves the right to reclaim variable components of the remuneration awarded for performance if performance data is subsequently proven to be misstated.

Achievement of annual performance goals (“How” and “What” to deliver), in order to create long-term and sustainable shareholder value. Assessment of goals defined on the individual’s performance contract including objectives related to selected KPI’s on the balanced scorecard constitute the basis for annual variable pay.

Long-term incentive (LTI)

Strengthen the alignment of top management and shareholder interests and retentionshareholders’ long-term interests. Retention of key employees.executives.

The LTI system is a monetary compensation calculated as a portion of the participant’s base salary; with a maximum annual grant at 30% of fixed remuneration.salary. On behalf of the participant, the company acquires shares equivalent to the net annual grant amount. The grant isshares are subject to a three yearthree-year lock-in period and then released for the participant’s disposal. Deviations applicable for

If the lock-in obligations are not fulfilled, the executive vice presidents employed outsidehas to pay back the parent company are describedgross value of the locked-in shares limited to the gross value of the grant amount.

The level of the annual LTI reward is in the statement on executive remuneration. range of 25-30%.

The threshold principles will applyare applied for the annual grant.

The company performance modifier is not applied for the LTI in Statoil ASA.

In Statoil ASA, LTI is a variable remuneration element, Participation in the LTI schemeparticipation and the size of the annual LTI elementgrant level are reflective of the level and impact of the position and not directly linked to the incumbent’s performance.

Annual Variable PayThreshold

DriveFinancial threshold for payment of variable remuneration and reward individuals for annual achievementaward of business objectives and how results are delivered. Ensure link between individual variable pay and company’s overall financial performance.LTI grant.

Members of the corporate executive committee are entitled to an annual variable pay ranging from 0–50% of their fixed remuneration. Target value is 25% (target value reflects fully satisfactory goal achievement).

Deviations applicable for members of the corporate executive committee employed outside the parent company are described in the statement on executive remuneration. The deviation will in 2016 apply for one executive vice president employed by Statoil Global Employment Company Ltd. in London.

The threshold principleshas the following guiding parameters;                 

1) Cash flows provided by operating activities after tax and before working capital items                                                       
2) Net debt ratio and development                                             
3) Company’s overall operational and financial performance.

Cash flows provided by operating activities after tax and before working capital items higher than USD 12 billion and a net debt ratio below 30% will normally guide for no reduction of bonus.

Application of the threshold is subject to a discretionary assessment of the company’s overall performance by the board of directors.

These measures and targets are indicative and will form part of a broader assessment of bonus award.

Company performance modifier

Strengthen the alignment between variable remuneration and the company modifier (subject to AGM approval) will apply.company’s performance.

 

Achievement of annualThe company performance goals (how and what to deliver), in order to create long-term and sustainable shareholder value. Assessment of goals related to selected KPI’s frommodifier determines the balanced scorecard will impact the variable remuneration for the membersproportion of the corporate executive committee.bonus that will be paid, ranging from 50% to 150%

The company performance modifier is subject to approval by the annual general meeting.

Company performance is assessed against two equally weighted measures: relative total shareholder return (TSR) and relative return on average capital employed (ROACE).

Application of the modifier is subject to discretionary assessment based on the company’s overall performance.

Pension & Insurance Schemesinsurance schemes

Provide competitive postemployment and other benefits.

The company offers a general occupational pension plan is a defined contribution scheme with a contribution level of 7%/22% below/above 7,1 G. The defined benefit scheme will be retained by a grandfathered group of employees. The benefit scheme has a pension level amounting to 66 per cent of the pensionable salary conditional on a minimum of 30 years of service. Pension from the nationaland insurance scheme aligned with local markets. Reference is taken into account when estimatingmade to the pension. In order to draw a fullsection on pension from Statoil’s defined benefit scheme the employment with the company needs to be maintained until the pensionable age.

For new internal members of the corporate executive committee a cap for pension contribution at 12 G is established.

and insurance scheme.

N/A

Employee Share Savings Planshare savings plan

Align and strengthen employee and shareholdershareholders’ interests and remunerate for long term commitment and value creation.

OfferThe share savings plan is offered to all employees in the group, provided no restrictions due to local legislation or business requirements. Participants are offered to purchase Statoil shares in the market limited to 5% of annual base salary.

If shares are kept for two calendar years of continued employment, the participants will be allocated bonus shares proportionate to their purchase.


1481) Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015Target value reflects satisfactory deliveries according to agreed goals


 


1.7.Base salary

Pension and remuneration mix 2016insurance schemes

Due toMembers of the current challenges facing our industrycorporate executive committee in Statoil ASA are covered by the company’s general occupational pension scheme which is a defined contribution scheme with falling oila contribution level of 7% below 7,1 G and gas prices, decreasing margins and unsustainable cost levels,22% above 7,1 G 2. A defined benefit scheme is retained by a salary freeze will be implemented forgrandfathered group of employees. For new members of the corporate executive committee and other leaders and senior professionals in 2016.

The graphs below illustrate the chief executive officer’s remuneration mix for 2016 andappointed after 13 February 2015, a typical remuneration mix for executive vice presidents. The chief executive officer’s total remuneration package includes an additional fixed remuneration element compared tocap on pension contribution at 12 G is applied. In lieu of pension accrual above 12 G a cash compensation is provided. Four of the executive vice presidents and the executive vice presidents remuneration package includes, as applicable,receive a cash compensation in lieu of pension contribution above 12 G due to the implemented cap, see section 1.2 Cap on pension contribution at the maximum limit in the tax-favoured joint pension schemes in Norway above; please see further details of the chief executive officer’s terms and conditions in section 1.11 Taccrual.erms and conditions for president and chief executive officer, Eldar

Sætre.

 


Figure 1: Illustrates chief executive officer remuneration mix for 2016. CEO’s pension was fully accrued by 31 December 2014.

Figure 2: Illustrates an example of a typical remuneration mix for an executive vice president in Statoil with a cap on pension contribution.

1.8.Pension and insurance schemes

Members of the corporate executive committee are part of the generalappointed before 13 February 2015, will maintain their pension schemecontribution above 12 G based on obligations in Statoil ASA. previously established agreements.

The chief executive officer and three executive vice presidents have individual early retirement pension agreement with the company.

 

The chief executive officer and one of the executive vice presidents have individual pension terms according to a previous standard arrangement implemented in October 2006. Subject to specific terms those executives are entitled to a pension amounting to 66 per cent66% of pensionable salary and a retirement age of 62. Reference is made to the section on CEO terms and conditions below. When calculating the number of years of membership in Statoil’s general pension plan, these agreements grant the right to an extra contribution time corresponding to half a year of extra membership for each year the individual has served as executive vice president.

 

In addition, two members of the corporate executive committee have individually agreed retirement age of 65 and an early retirement pension level amounting to 66% of pensionable salary.

 

The individual pension terms for executive vice presidents outlined above are results of commitments according to previouspreviously established individual agreements.

 

FollowingStatoil has implemented a board decision 7 February 2012,general cap on pensionable income at 12 G for all new hires into the company’s standard pension arrangements for executive vice presidents deviating from Statoil ASA’s general pension plan have been discontinued and have not been applied for new appointments to the corporate executive committee.company employed as of 1 September 2017.

 

As described in section 1.2, a cap on pension contribution for income above 12 G was in 2015 implemented for new members of the Corporate Executive Committee. The cap is applied to four executives vice presidents appointed after 13 February 2015.

Members of the corporate executive committee appointed before 13 February 2015, will maintain their pension contribution above 12 G based on obligations in established agreements.

Pension accruals for pensionable salary above 12 G are recognised as an unfunded defined benefit pension plan, i.e. not funded in a separate legal entity.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015149


In addition to the pension benefits outlined above, the executive vice presidents in the parent company are offered disability and dependents’ benefits in accordance with Statoil’s general pension plan/defined benefit plan. Members of the corporate executive committee are covered by the general insurance schemes applicable within Statoil.

 

150Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


1.9.Severance pay arrangements

The chief executive officer and the executive vice presidents are entitled to a severance payment equivalent to six months’ salary, commencing at the time of expiry of a six months’ notice period, when the resignation is at the request from the company. The same amount of severance payment is also payable if the parties agree that the employment should be discontinued and the executive vice president gives notice pursuant to a written agreement with the company. Any other payment earned by the executive vice president during the period of severance payment will be fully deducted. This relates to earnings from any employment or business activity where the executive vice president has active ownership.

 

The entitlement to severance payment is conditional on the chief executive officer or the executive vice president not being guilty of gross misconduct, gross negligence, disloyalty or other material breach of his/her duties.

 

As a general rule, the chief executive officer’s/executive vice president’s own notice will not instigate any severance payment.

 

1.10.Other benefits

Statoil has a share savings plan available to all employees including members of the corporate executive committee. The share savings plan entails an offer to purchase Statoil shares in the market limited to five per cent of annual gross salary. If the shares are kept for two full calendar years of continued employment the employees will be allocated bonus shares proportionate to their purchase. Shares to be used for sale and transfer to employees are acquired by Statoil in the market, in accordance with the authorisation from the annual general meeting.

The members of the corporate executive committee have benefits in kind such as company car and electronic communication. They are also eligible for participation in the share saving scheme as described above.

 

1.11.Terms and conditions for president and chief executive officer, Eldar Sætre

Effective 4 February 2015 Statoil’s board of directors appointed Eldar Sætre as president and chief executive officer of Statoil, following an acting period since 15 October 2014. The chief executive officer’s annual base salary is NOK 5,700,000. Furthermore, the CEO is entitled to an additional fixed remuneration element of NOK 2,000,000 not included in the pensionable income.

The chief executive officer will participate in an annual variable pay scheme with a target level of 25%, and participation to the Company’s 2016 LTI scheme with a value of 30% (gross) of base salary. The pension terms remain unchanged according to previously established pension agreement, as described in section 1.8 above.

2.

Performance management, assessment and results essential for variable pay

2.1.Performance management, assessment and results essential for variable pay for 2015

Individual salary and annual variable pay reviews are based on the performance evaluation in our performance management system.development process.

 

Performance is evaluated in two dimensions; “What” we deliver and “How” we deliver. Goals on “How” we deliver are based on our core values and leadership principles and address the behaviour required and expected in order to achieve our delivery goals.

“What”“What” we deliver (business delivery) is defined through the company’s performance framework “Ambition to Action”, which addresses strategic objectives, key performance Indicators (KPIs) and actions across the five perspectives; Safety, Security and Sustainability, People and Leadership, Operations, Market and Results.Finance. Generally, Statoil believes in setting ambitious targets to inspire and drive strong performance.

 

In 2015,Goals on “How” we deliver are based on our core values and leadership principles and address the main objectivesbehaviour required and KPIs for each perspective were as outlined below. Each perspective wasexpected in addition supported by comprehensive plans and actions. It is only the KPI’s for Results that will affect variable remuneration for membersorder to achieve our delivery goals.


2) G = The basic amount of the corporate executive committee.Norwegian social security system

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    151129


Strategic objectives

2015 assessment

Safety,
Security and Sustainability

The strategic objectives and actions address security and sustainability (Safety - see the Results perspective below)

There were no serious well incidents, whereas the number of oil and gas leakages was above target. Total CO2 reduction was better than targeted and future ambitions have been increased.

People and organisation

The strategic objectives and actions address high performing leaders and teams, and global and cost-effective capabilities

Employee engagement increased from 2014, during a time with extensive organisational efficiency programmes. Leadership renewal across the organisation was better than targeted.

Operations

The strategic objectives and actions address reliable and cost-efficient operations, and value-driven technology development.

Production came in well above target, partly driven by continued improvements in production efficiency and optimised gas production from our flexible gas fields. Unit production cost is now the lowest among industry peers. Unit finding cost increased due to lower than expected exploration results.

Market

The strategic objectives and actions address stakeholder trust, value chain optimisation and portfolio and project management.

The organic Reserve Replacement Ratio (RRR) ended somewhat below the target of 1, while total RRR was well below due to divestments and a number of projects being postponed to maintain financial flexibility and improve project profitability. Project cost efficiency versus peers continued to improve.

Results

The strategic objectives and actions address shareholder return, financial robustness, value creation from exploration, cost & capital discipline and for 2015 also Safety.

Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) improved and ended on 6th against an industry peer group of 12. Relative RoACE also ended 6th but fell as a result of high exposure to upstream margins. Capex ended well below initially guided levels. The cash flow improvement programme delivered well above target. The serious incident frequency of 0,6 was unchanged from 2014. 


Board assessment of the chief executive officer’s performance

In its assessment of the chief executive officer’s performance, and consequently his merit and annual pay for 2015, the board has put emphasis on the solid delivery on the cashflow improvement programme as well as CAPEX reductions and TSR. Serious incident frequency also continues to improve from 2014.

Before final conclusions of the performance assessmentsPerformance evaluation is holistic, involving both measurement and assessment. Since KPIs are drawn,indicators only, sound judgement and hindsight information are applied. Measured KPI results are reviewed against their strategic contribution, sustainability and significantSignificant changes in assumptions.assumptions are taken into account, as well as target ambition levels, sustainability of delivered results and strategic contribution.

 

This balanced approach, which involves a broad set of goals defined in relation to both “What” and “How” dimensions and an overall performance evaluation, is viewed to significantly reduce the likelihood that remuneration policies may stimulate excessive risk-taking or have other material adverse effects.

 

2.2KeyIn the performance indicators forcontracts of the chief executive officer for 2016

Forand chief financial officer, one of several targets is related to the accounting year 2016 the CEO’s variable remuneration for 2016 and base salary merit increase as of 1 January 2017 will be based on assessment of results on the following KIPs:

Safety, Security and Sustainability

·CO2 intensity for the upstream portfolio

·Serious Incident Frequency (actual)

Market

·Capex (capital expenditure)

Results

·Relative Total Shareholder Return

·Relative RoACE

·Cash flow improvement programme

3.Executioncompany’s relative total shareholder return (TSR). The amount of the remuneration policy and principles in 2015

3.1Deviations from the governmental guidelines on variable compensation 2015

Two members of the executive committee had in 2015 variable pay schemes deviating from the description in section 1.6 above. One of the executives was employed by Statoil Gulf Services LLC in Houston and resigned from the company 31 July 2015. He was entitled to a variable pay scheme with a maximum of 100% for AVP and LTI, respectively. The other is still employed by Statoil Global Employment Company Ltd. in London and his variable pay scheme entail a framework for variable pay of 75% of his base salary for each of the elements annual variable pay and LTI, and is decided based on an overall assessment of the performance based. His contract also includes a provision for severance payment of 12 months’ base salary.various targets including but not limited to the company's relative TSR.

  

1521302   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

In 2017, the main objectives and KPIs for each perspective were as outlined below. Each perspective was in addition supported by comprehensive plans and actions.

Strategic objectives 

2017 assessment

Safety, security and sustainability

The strategic objectives and actions address safety, security and sustainability

Total Serious Incident Frequency of 0.6 was on target, improving from the 2016 level. The target on Total Recordable Injury Frequency was narrowly missed. The number of oil and gas leakages improved from 2016 but exceeded the target.

CO2 intensity for the upstream portfolio improved from the 2016 level, and Statoil reached its target of being in the top quartile in the IOGP company report on this parameter.

People and organisation

The strategic objectives and actions address a value based and high performing organisation

The score on Employee engagement exceeded the target, also increasing from the 2016 level, which confirmed the employees’ continued engagement and commitment to Statoil despite a challenging business context

The results on People development were above target, showing positive trends both in learning activities and in internal deployment.

Operations

The strategic objectives and actions address reliable and cost-efficient operations, and being a driver in oil and gas industry transformation

Production was highest in Statoil’s history and exceeded the target.

On relative unit production cost, Statoil reached the target of being in the first quartile of the peer group. The company maintained its position at the top of the peer group for the third year running.

Production efficiency was above target.

Market

The strategic objectives and actions address a flexible and resilient energy portfolio

Reserve replacement ratio exceeded the target of 1, driven by project sanctions and upward revisions on a number of existing assets, both offshore and onshore.

Organic capex was better than the original guiding and target, mainly due to strict prioritisation and continuous focus on capital efficiency.

Value creation from exploration did not reach the target, mainly due to lower-than-expected discovered volumes. However, Statoil has secured access to new acreage, such as the Carcara North block in Brazil and the Bajo del Toro block in Argentina.

Finance

The strategic objectives and actions address cash generation, profitability and competitiveness

On Relative Shareholder Return, Statoil ranked 4th in an industry peer group of 12, thus meeting the target of securing a position above average.

On Relative ROACE, Statoil ranked 2nd in the peer group, thus meeting the target of securing a position above average.

The cash flow improvement programme delivered above target.

Board assessment of the chief executive officer’s performance

In its assessment of the chief executive officer’s performance, and consequently his annual pay for 2017, the board has put emphasis on a strong delivery on production, continued efficiency improvements, and a positive trend within Safety, Security and Sustainability (SSU). The negative trend from 2016 has been turned and the Serious Incidents Frequency (SIF) is on target. CO2 intensity per boe has been reduced with more than 10% compared to 2016 results.

Statoil has increased production guiding and at the same time reduced the capex, enabled by further efficiency improvements and strict prioritization. Statoil has secured access to new acreage and strengthened the portfolio. The TSR and ROACE results are solid. Employee engagement is strong and improving, supported by a dedicated focus on people development.

 

+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed remuneration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members of the corporate

executive committee                                                                                                    (figures in USD thousand,

except no. of shares)1), 2)

Fixed pay3)

Cash allowance4)

LTI 5)

Annual

variable pay6)

Taxable

benefits

2017 Taxable compensation

Non-taxable

benefits

in kind

Estimated

pension

cost7)

Estimated present

value of pension

obligation 8)

 

2016 Taxable

compensation9)

Share ownership at 31 December 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eldar Sætre10)

1,045

0

149

570

48

1,812

0

0

14,489

 

1,356

56,896

Margareth Øvrum

494

0

54

253

36

837

24

0

6,912

 

631

56,125

Timothy Dodson

466

0

52

140

31

689

46

152

4,977

 

573

34,425

Irene Rummelhoff

381

62

38

154

22

657

0

29

1,404

 

511

25,081

Jens Økland

396

65

41

145

20

667

0

24

1,067

 

509

17,207

Arne Sigve Nylund

429

0

50

218

23

720

0

120

4,314

 

546

13,354

Lars Christian Bacher

447

0

46

193

24

710

58

128

2,733

 

567

23,309

Hans Jakob Hegge

398

66

44

170

25

703

0

25

1,493

 

561

32,104

Jannicke Nilsson

401

63

42

147

25

678

24

36

1,315

 

40

38,491

Torgrim Reitan11)

696

0

50

169

143

1,058

0

121

2,712

 

884

36,235

John Knight12)

1,643

0

0

0

181

1,824

0

0

0

 

1,810

109,901

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017131


1)All figures in the table are presented in USD based on average currency rates (2017: USD/NOK = 8.2630, USD/GBP = 1.2882. 2016: USD/NOK = 8.3987, USD/GBP = 1.3538). The board’s overall assessmentfigures are presented on accrual basis.

2)All CEC members receive their remuneration in NOK except John Knight who receives the remuneration in GBP.

3)Fixed pay consists of base salary, fixed remuneration element, holiday allowance and other administrative benefits.

4)Cash allowance in lieu of pension accrual above 12 G (G is that the extended framework implemented with effect from 1 January 2011base amount in the national insurance scheme).

5)The long-term incentive (LTI) element implies an obligation to invest the net amount in Statoil shares, including a lock-in period. The LTI element is presented the year it is granted for the variable pay schemes for these executives is necessary due to local market conditions, but not market leading for positions at this level at the respective locations.

3.2Changes to the Corporate Executive Committee in 2015

In addition to the appointment of Eldar Sætre as president and chief executive officer, several changes have in 2015 been implemented to the organisational structure and the compositionmembers of the corporate executive committee. A new corporate staff and support function, chief operating officer (COO), was established from 1 April 2015, and Anders Opedal was appointed as executive vice president and COO.

New energy Solution (NES) was established as a new business area 1 June 2015 with Irene Rummelhoff as the executive vice president. Jens Økland was appointed executive vice president in MMP from 1 June 2015 succeeding Tor Martin Anfinnsen’s acting period.

committee employed by Statoil ASA.

William Maloney, executive vice president Development and Production North America (DPNA), resigned from the company 31 July 2015. An adjustment to the DPNA organisation is implemented and this business area is renamed to Development and Production USA (DPUSA)6)[3] . Torgrim Reitan assumed responsibility as executive vice president in DPUSA as of 1 August 2015. Hans Jakob Hegge succeeded Torgrim Reitan as CFO from 1 august 2015.

3.3Changes to individual terms in 2015 

Following former president and chief executive officer Helge Lund’s resignation a termination agreement was entered into. Helge Lund’s termination date was 9 February 2015. Helge Lund received base salary and benefits compensation up until this date. He did not receiveAnnual variable pay for the performance year 2014. The LTI scheme and share savings plan was closed in accordance with the company policy, and a repayment of NOK 5,033,491 was made by Helge Lund to Statoil ASA according to the LTI agreement. The company issued a paid-up policy and pension right letters for his pension accruals, in accordance with his individual pension agreement.

4.The decision-making process

The decision-making process for implementing or changing remuneration policies and concepts, and the determination of salaries and other remunerationincludes holiday allowance for corporate executive committee (CEC) members resident in Norway.

7)Estimated pension cost is calculated based on actuarial assumptions and pensionable salary (mainly base salary) at 31 December 2016 and is recognised as pension cost in the statement of income for 2017. 

8)Eldar Sætre, Arne Sigve Nylund, Margareth Øvrum and Timothy Dodson are maintained in accordance with the provisionsclosed Defined Benefit Scheme, whereas the remaining members of corporate executive committee employed by Statoil ASA, is covered by the Norwegian public limited liability companies act sections 5-6Defined Contribution Pension Scheme.

9)Includes 2016 CEC members who are also CEC members in 2017.

10)Estimated present value of pension obligation for Eldar Sætre is based on retirement at the age of 67. Eldar Sætre has the right to retire at an earlier stage.

11)Terms and 6-16conditions for Torgrim Reitan also include compensation according to Statoil’s international assignment terms.

12)John Knight’s fixed pay includes a fixed remuneration element of USD 143,000 that replaces his defined contribution pension plan and the board’s rulesa fixed remuneration element of procedure. The board’s rules of procedure are available at www.statoil.com/board.  USD 689,000 replacing his variable pay arrangements.

 

The board of directors has appointed a designated compensation and executive development committee. The compensation and executive development committee is a preparatory body forThere are no loans from the board. The committee’s main objective iscompany to assist the board of directors in its work relating to the terms of employment for Statoil’s chief executive officer and the main principles and strategy for the remuneration and leadership development of our senior executives. The board of directors determines the chief executive officer’s salary and other terms of employment.

The compensation and executive development committee answers to the board of Statoil ASA for the performance of its duties. The workmembers of the committee in no way alters the responsibilities of the board of directors or the individual board members.

For further details about the roles and responsibilities of the compensation andcorporate executive development committee, please refer to the committee’s instructions available at committee.

www.statoil.com/compensationcommittee1322

5.Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017    


Company performance modifier

Introduction

It is recommended to introduceBased on initial approval by the annual general meeting in 2016 a company performance modifier was introduced to be applied in calculation of variable pay. The intention is to continue with the performance modifier in 2018. The relative total shareholder return is recommended as one of the criteria in the company modifier. Thus, the caseproposal is submitted to the annual general meeting for approval, pursuant to the provisions in the Public Limited Companies Act § 5-6 third paragraph last sentence ref. § 6-16 a, first paragraph third sentence number 3.

 

Background

Statoil has implemented annual variable pay schemes (AVP) for members of the corporate executive committee. The schemes are described in section 1.6on remuneration concept for the corporate executive committee of this statement.declaration. Other executives, managers and employees in defined professional positions are also eligible for individual variable pay according to the company’s guidelines.

 

The company’s current annual variable pay scheme is entirely based on the individual participants’ performance. Statoil has not implemented a company performance modifier foris implemented to strengthen the variable pay schemes. The prevalent trend in the market is to ensure that variable remuneration is aligned withlink between the company’s performance.overall financial results and the individual variable pay. The governmental guidelines on executive remuneration also underline that “there shall be a clear connection between the variable salary and the performance of the company.”

 

Proposal

Based on this, it is proposed to strengthen the link between the company’s overall financial results and the individual variable pay by introducing a company performance modifier.modifier will be continued in 2018. The company performance is planned towill be assessed against two equally weighted measures: relative total shareholder return (TSR) and relative return on average capital employed (RoACE)(ROACE). TSR and RoACE have historically


[3] Transfer of responsibility for the company’s business in Canada from Development and Production North America (DPNA) to Development and Production International (DPI)

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015153


constituted important performance indicators at the company’s scorecard andROACE are currently also applied as performance indicators in the corporate performance management system.

 

154Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The results of both of these corporatetwo performance measures are compared to our peers and our relative position determined. A position of first quartileQuartile 1 means that Statoil is amongst the top scoring quartile of peer companies. A position of fourth quartileQuartile 4 means Statoil is in the bottom performing quartile. In years with strong deliveries on relative TSR and RoACE,ROACE, the matrix will result in the variable pay being modified with a factor higher than one and, correspondingly, lower than one in weak years. By applying relative numbers, the effect of fluctuating oil price will be reduced.  

The combination of ratings for both measures, will act as a ‘multiplier’ according to the guideline in the matrix displayed below.


The plan is to introduce the company performance modifier in calculation of annual variable pay for members of Statoil’s corporate executive committee. Further application of the company performance modifier in Long-term incentive schemes will also be assessed and decided if deemed appropriate. In Long-term incentive schemes a three years average result for the modifier will typically be applied. The company also plan to implement the modifier in variable pay schemes for employees in positions below the corporate executive level.  

The annual variable pay for members of the corporate executive committee will be within a framework of 50% of the fixed remuneration irrespective of the result of the modifier. Any deviations from this framework for members of the corporate executive committee will be explicitly explained in the board’s annual Statements

By applying relative numbers, the effect of fluctuating oil price will be reduced. Within the framework of 50 - 150%, the matrix is a guideline and the multiplier (percentages) may be adjusted if oil or gas price effects or other occurrences outside the control of the company are deemed to cause disproportionate results in a given year.

Subject to approval by the 2018 annual general meeting, the company performance modifier will be continued in calculations of annual variable pay for members of the corporate executive committee in the earning year 2018 with subsequent impact on annual variable pay in 2019. The modifier will also be applied in other variable pay schemes below the corporate executive level. Further application of the company performance modifier will also be assessed and decided if deemed appropriate.

The annual variable pay for members of the corporate executive committee will be within a framework of 50% of the fixed remuneration irrespective of the result of the modifier. Any deviations from this framework for members of the corporate executive committee will be explained in the board’s annual declaration on remuneration and other employment terms for Statoil’s corporate executive committee.

A complete statement on remuneration and other employment terms for Statoil’s corporate executive committee is available at www.statoil.com.  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015155


7.10 Share ownership

This section describes the number of Statoil shares owned by the members of the board of directors, the corporate assembly and the corporate executive committee.

 

3.8 Share ownership

The number of Statoil shares owned by the members of the board of directors and the executive committee and/or owned by their close associates is shown below. Individually, each member of the board of directors and the corporate executive committee owned less than 1% of the outstanding Statoil shares.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017133


 

 

As of 31 December

As of 8 March

 

As of 31 December

As of 14 March

Ownership of Statoil shares (including share ownership of «close associates»)

Ownership of Statoil shares (including share ownership of «close associates»)

2015

2016

Ownership of Statoil shares (including share ownership of «close associates»)

2017

2018

 

 

 

 

Members of the corporate executive committee

Members of the corporate executive committee

 

Members of the corporate executive committee

 

Eldar Sætre

Eldar Sætre

39,130

40,024

Eldar Sætre

56,896

57,783

Hans Jakob Hegge

Hans Jakob Hegge

22,854

23,908

Hans Jakob Hegge

32,104

33,305

Anders Opedal

14,511

Jannicke Nilsson

Jannicke Nilsson

38,491

39,638

Lars Christian Bacher

Lars Christian Bacher

21,116

22,308

Lars Christian Bacher

23,309

24,400

Torgrim Reitan

Torgrim Reitan

 28,482 

29,435

Torgrim Reitan

36,235

37,358

John Knight

John Knight

85,731

87,565

John Knight

109,901

112,543

Tim Dodson

Tim Dodson

28,614

29,438

Tim Dodson

34,425

35,506

Margareth Øvrum

Margareth Øvrum

42,621

44,033

Margareth Øvrum

56,125

57,655

Arne Sigve Nylund

Arne Sigve Nylund

9,261

Arne Sigve Nylund

13,354

Jens Økland

Jens Økland

10,735

11,386

Jens Økland

17,207

17,657

Irene Rummelhoff

Irene Rummelhoff

 17,082 

17,639

Irene Rummelhoff

25,081

25,795

 

 

 

 

Members of the board of directors

Members of the board of directors

 

Members of the board of directors

 

Øystein Løseth

1,000

Jon Erik Reinhardsen

Jon Erik Reinhardsen

2,558

Roy Franklin

Roy Franklin

0

Roy Franklin

0

Bjørn Tore Godal

Bjørn Tore Godal

0

Bjørn Tore Godal

0

Jakob Stausholm

50,000

Jeroen van der Veer

Jeroen van der Veer

0

Maria Johanna Oudeman

Maria Johanna Oudeman

0

Maria Johanna Oudeman

0

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

0

Rebekka Glasser Herlofsen

0

Wenche Agerup

Wenche Agerup

2,423

Wenche Agerup

2,650

Lill-Heidi Bakkerud

330

Per Martin Labråten

Per Martin Labråten

1,343

1,516

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

2,845

3,165

Ingrid Elisabeth di Valerio

4,471

4,821

Stig Lægreid

Stig Lægreid

1,519

1,807

Stig Lægreid

1,975

 

 

Individually, each member of the corporate assembly owned less than 1% of the outstanding Statoil shares as of 31 December 20152017 and as of 814 March 2016.2018. In aggregate, members of the corporate assembly owned a total of 19,59230,839 shares as of 31 December 20152017 and a total of 22,15733,029 shares as of 814 March 2016.2018. Information about the individual share ownership of the members of the corporate assembly is presented in the section 3.8 Corporate governance - Corporate assembly.assembly, board of directors and management.

 

The voting rights of members of the board of directors, the corporate executive committee and the corporate assembly do not differ from those of ordinary shareholders.

 

7.11 Independent3.9 External auditor

  

This section provides details about the independent auditor, the remuneration of the auditor and policies and procedures relating to the auditor.

Our independent registered public accounting firm (independent(external auditor) is independent in relation to Statoil and is elected by the general meeting of shareholders. The independentexternal auditor's fee must be approved by the general meeting of shareholders.

 

Pursuant to the instructions for the board's audit committee approved by the board of directors, the audit committee is responsible for ensuring that the company is subject to an independent and effective external and internal audit.

Every year, the independentexternal auditor presents a plan to the audit committee for the execution of the independentexternal auditor's work.

The independentexternal auditor attends the meeting of the board of directors that deals with the preparation of the annual accounts.

156Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

The independentexternal auditor also participates in meetings of the audit committee. The audit committee considers all reports from the external auditor before they are considered by the board of directors. The audit committee meets at least five times a year and both the board and the board’s audit committee hold meetings with the internal auditor and the external auditor on a regular basis without the company’s management being present.

 

When evaluating the independentexternal auditor, emphasis is placed on the firm's qualifications, capacity, local and international availability and the size of the fee.

 

The audit committee evaluates and makes a recommendation to the board of directors, the corporate assembly and the general meeting of shareholders regarding the choice of independentexternal auditor. The committee is responsible for ensuring that the independentexternal auditor

1342Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


meets the requirements in Norway and in the countries where Statoil is listed. The independentexternal auditor is subject to the provisions of US securities legislation, which stipulates that a responsible partner may not lead the engagement for more than five consecutive years.

 

The audit committee considers all reports from the independent auditor before they are considered by the board of directors. The audit committee holds regular meetings with the independent auditor without the company's management being present.

The audit committee's policies and procedures for pre-approval

In its instructions for the audit committee, the board of directors has delegated authority to the audit committee to pre-approve assignments to be performed by the independentexternal auditor. Within this pre-approval, the audit committee has issued further guidelines. The audit committee has issued guidelines for the management's pre-approval of assignments to be performed by the independentexternal auditor.

 

All audit-related and other services provided by the independentexternal auditor must be pre-approved by the audit committee. Provided that the types of services proposed are permissible under SEC guidelines, pre-approval is usually granted at a regular audit committee meeting. The chair of the audit committee has been authorised to pre-approve services that are in accordance with policies established by the audit committee that specify in detail the types of services that qualify. It is a condition that any services pre-approved in this manner are presented to the full audit committee at its next meeting. Some pre-approvals can therefore be granted by the chair of the audit committee if an urgent reply is deemed necessary.

 

Remuneration of the independentexternal auditor in 2015 – 2017

In the annual Consolidated financial statements and in the parent company's financial statements, the independent auditor's remuneration is split between the audit fee and the fee for audit-related and other services. The chair presents the breakdown between the audit fee and the fee for audit-related and other services to the annual general meeting of shareholders.

 

The following table sets out the aggregate fees related to professional services rendered by Statoil's principal accountantexternal auditor KPMG AS, for the fiscal year 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017135


 

Auditor's remuneration

  For the year ended 31 December

Auditor's remuneration

(in NOK million, excluding VAT)

2015

2014

2013

Full year

(in USD million, excluding VAT)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Audit fee

49

45

38

6.1

6.5

6.1

Audit related fee

14

8

0.9

1.0

1.7

Tax fee

0

0.0

0.1

0.0

Other service fee

0

0.0

 

 

 

Total

63

53

46

7.0

7.5

7.9

 

All fees included in the table werehave been approved by the board's audit committee.

 

Audit fee  is defined as the fee for standard audit work that must be performed every year in order to issue an opinion on Statoil's Consolidated financial statements, on Statoil's internal control over annual reporting and to issue reports on the statutory financial statements. It also includes other audit services, which are services that only the independent auditor can reasonably provide, such as the auditing of non-recurring transactions and the application of new accounting policies, audits of significant and newly implemented system controls and limited reviews of quarterly financial results.

 

Audit-related fees  include other assurance and related services provided by auditors, but not limited to those that can only reasonably be provided by the external auditor who signs the audit report, that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company's financial statements, such as acquisition due diligence, audits of pension and benefit plans, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

 

Other services fees  include services, if any, provided by the auditors within the framework of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, i.e. certain agreed procedures.

Of total increase in audit and audit related fees, NOK 3.2 million is due to currency effects, equivalent to 5%.

 

In addition to the figures in the table above, the audit fees and audit-related fees relating to Statoil lated fees relating to Statoil-160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136160136operated licences paid to KPMG for the years 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 amounted to NOK 7USD 0.8 million, NOK 6USD 0.8 million and NOK 6USD 0.9 million, respectively.

3.10 Risk management and internal controls

Risk management

The board focuses on ensuring adequate control of the company's internal control and overall risk management. The board conducts an annual enterprise risk management review and two times pr. year the board is presented with and discusses the main risks and risk issues Statoil is facing. The board's audit committee assists the board and act as a preparatory body in connection with monitoring of the company's internal control, internal audit and risk management systems. The board's safety, sustainability and ethics committee monitors and assesses safety, sustainability and climate risks which are relevant for Statoil's operations and both committees report regularly to the full board.

Statoil manages risk to make sure that our operations are safe and in compliance with our requirements. Our overall risk management approach includes continuously assessing and managing risks related to our value chain in order to support the achievement of our principal objectives, i.e. value creation and avoiding incidents.

The company has a separate corporate risk committee chaired by the chief financial officer. The committee meets at least five times a year to give advice and make recommendations on Statoil's enterprise risk management. Further information about the company's risk management is presented in section 2.11 of the form 20-F Risk review.

All risks are related to Statoil's value chain - from access, maturing, project execution and operations to market. In addition to the financial impact these risks could have on Statoil's cash flows, we have also implemented procedures and systems to reduce safety, security and integrity incidents (such as fraud and corruption), as well as any reputation impact resulting from human rights, labour standards and transparency issues. Most of the risks are managed by our principal business area line managers. Some operational risks are insured by our captive insurance company, which operates in the Norwegian and international insurance markets.

Controls and procedures

1362Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    157


7.12 Controls and procedures

This section describes controls and procedures relating to our financial reporting.

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by the Form 20-F. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that as a result of a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting described below, these disclosure controls and procedures arewere not effective at a reasonable level of assurance.assurance as of 31 December 2017.

 

In order to facilitate the evaluation, the disclosure committee reviews material disclosures made by Statoil for any errors, misstatements and omissions. The disclosure committee is chaired by the chief financial officer. It consists of the heads of investor relations, accounting and financial compliance, performance management and risk,controlling, tax and the general counsel and it may be supplemented by other internal and external personnel. The head of the internal audit is an observer at the committee's meetings.

 

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, recognised that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance that the desired control objectives will be achieved, and that the management must necessarily exercise judgment when evaluating the cost-benefit aspects of possible controls and procedures. Because of the limitations inherent in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and any instances of fraud in the company have been detected.

 

The management's report on internal control over financial reporting

The management of Statoil ASA is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed, under the supervision of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of Statoil's financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU). The accounting policies applied by the group also comply with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

 

Material weakness

The management of Statoil has assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, the management has concluded that Statoil's internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 20152017 was not effective due to the existence of a material weakness in our controls and procedures for the identification, assessment and timely and appropriate communication to the Board Audit Committee of questions or concerns (including allegations of misconduct) raised by employees in connection with termination of their employment relating to issues that could potentially have a material impact on our Consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting (otherwise than through Statoil’s external Ethics help line established by the Board Audit Committee). The allegations were subject to thorough investigations with external advisors, and no material misstatements were identified. There has been no effect on the 2017 Consolidated financial statements, or earlier periods, related to this matter.

Specifically, management identified that the established controls, policies and procedures did not operate as intended because our written procedures did not contain a sufficient level of precision for the identification, assessment and timely and appropriate communication of such matters to the appropriate relevant internal bodies including, where appropriate the Board Audit Committee. Other controls that should have compensated for this weakness did not operate as intended with respect to the reporting of such matters by some employees and so were ineffective.

Management has analysed the material weakness and performed additional analysis and procedures in preparing our Consolidated financial statements. We have concluded that our Consolidated financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow at and for the periods presented. Apart from the material weakness described above, Statoil’s management has not identified any other deficiencies that would have led management to conclude that Statoil’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective. However, the material weakness identified created a possibility that a material misstatement to the Consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis and accordingly a remediation plan has been undertaken.

 

Statoil's internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets, provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded in the manner necessary to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that receipts and expenditures are only carried out in accordance with the authorisation of the management and directors of Statoil; and provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of any unauthorised acquisition, use or disposition of Statoil's assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017137


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control to future periods are subject to a risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm

The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 20152017 has been audited by KPMG AS, an independent registered public accounting firm that also audits the Consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. reportTheir audit report on the internal control over financial reporting expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017.

Remediation plan

Our management is included in section 8 inactively undertaking remediation efforts to address the Consolidated financial statements in this report.material weakness identified above as follows:

·Enhancement of the precision level of written controls, policies and procedures regarding identification, assessment and timely communication to the Board Audit Committee

·Enhanced training of Statoil employees, with respect to these policies and relevant procedures

Management believes the foregoing plan effectively remediate the material weakness. As the remediation is implemented, management may take additional measures or modify the plan described above.

 

NoChanges in internal control over financial reporting

Other than the remediation plan described above, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by Form 20-F that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

We continuously make improvementwill continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control environment.

over financial reporting and are committed to taking further action by implementing additional enhancements or improvements as may be deemed necessary.

 

1581382   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

84.1 Consolidated financial statements of the Statoil group

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year

 

 

2015

2014

2013

(in NOK billion)

Note

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

   

465.3

606.8

616.6

Net income from equity accounted investments

   

(0.3)

(0.3)

0.1

Other income

4

17.8

16.1

17.8

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

3

482.8

622.7

634.5

 

   

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

   

(211.2)

(301.3)

(306.9)

Operating expenses

   

(84.5)

(72.9)

(74.1)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   

(7.5)

(7.3)

(7.8)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

11, 12

(133.8)

(101.4)

(72.4)

Exploration expenses

12

(31.0)

(30.3)

(18.0)

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

3

14.9

109.5

155.5

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

8

(10.6)

(0.0)

(17.0)

 

   

 

 

 

Income before tax

 

4.3

109.4

138.4

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

9

(41.6)

(87.4)

(99.2)

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

   

(37.3)

22.0

39.2

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to equity holders of the company

   

(37.5)

21.9

39.9

Attributable to non-controlling interests

   

0.2

0.1

(0.6)

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share (in NOK)

10

(11.80)

6.89

12.53

Diluted earnings per share (in NOK)

10

(11.80)

6.87

12.50

  

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The board of directors and shareholders of Statoil ASA


Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Statoil ASA andsubsidiaries (the Company) as of 31 December 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended 31 December 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of 31 December 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended 31 December 2017, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated 15 March 2018 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has elected to present net interest costs related to its defined benefit pension plans within net financial items in 2017. These expenses were previously included in the consolidated statement of income as part of pension cost within net operating income in prior periods.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    159139


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

Full year

(in NOK billion)

Note

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 (37.3) 

 22.0  

 39.2  

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gains (losses) on defined benefit pension plans

19

 10.1  

 (0.0) 

 (5.9) 

Income tax effect on income and expense recognised in OCI

 

 (2.8) 

 0.9  

 1.5  

Items that will not be reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income

 

 7.3  

 0.9  

 (4.4) 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustments1)

 

 27.4  

 41.6  

 22.9  

Items that may be subsequently reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income

 

 27.4  

 41.6  

 22.9  

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 34.7  

 42.5  

 18.5  

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 (2.6) 

 64.5  

 57.7  

 

 

 

 

 

Attributable to the equity holders of the company

 

 (2.8) 

 64.4  

 58.3  

Attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 0.2  

 0.1  

 (0.6) 

1)Currency translation adjustments of NOK 27.4 billion in 2015 are net of accumulated currency translation gains of NOK 3.3 billion reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income related to the sale of interests in the Shah Deniz project, the South Caucasus Pipeline and the Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG. See note 4 Acquisitions and dispositions.  /s/ KPMG AS

 

 

Stavanger, Norway

15 March 2018

Report of KPMG on Statoil’s internal control over financial

reporting


The board of directors and shareholders of Statoil ASA


Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Statoil ASA’s and subsidiaries (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness, described below, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of 31 December 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated 15 March 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

A material weakness related to controls and procedures for the identification, assessment and timely and appropriate communication to the Board Audit Committee of questions or concerns (including allegation of misconduct) raised by employees in connection with termination of their employment (otherwise than through the Company's external Ethics help line) has been identified as described in management’s assessment.

No misstatements in the consolidated financial statements were identified as a result of this matter. The material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2017 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those consolidated financial statements.


Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management's report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A

1601402   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 

 

 

 

 

  At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

Note

2015

2014

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

11

546.2

562.1

Intangible assets

12

83.3

85.2

Equity accounted investments

   

7.3

8.4

Deferred tax assets

9

17.8

12.9

Pension assets

19

11.3

8.0

Derivative financial instruments

25

23.8

29.9

Financial investments

13

20.6

19.6

Prepayments and financial receivables

13

8.5

5.7

 

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   

718.7

731.7

 

 

 

 

Inventories

14

22.0

23.7

Trade and other receivables

15

58.8

83.3

Derivative financial instruments

25

4.8

5.3

Financial investments

13

86.5

59.2

Cash and cash equivalents

16

76.0

83.1

 

   

 

 

Total current assets

   

248.0

254.8

 

 

 

 

Total assets

   

966.7

986.4

 

 

 

 

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

   

354.7

380.8

Non-controlling interests

   

0.3

0.4

 

 

 

 

Total equity

17

355.1

381.2

 

 

 

 

Finance debt

18, 22

264.0

205.1

Deferred tax liabilities

9

65.4

71.5

Pension liabilities

19

26.2

27.9

Provisions

20

109.4

117.2

Derivative financial instruments

25

11.3

4.5

 

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   

476.3

426.2

 

 

 

 

Trade and other payables

21

82.2

100.7

Current tax payable

   

24.1

39.6

Finance debt

18

20.5

26.5

Dividends payable

17

6.2

5.7

Derivative financial instruments

25

2.3

6.6

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   

135.3

179.0

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   

611.7

605.2

 

 

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

   

966.7

986.4

company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    161141


 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(in NOK billion)

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Retained earnings

Currency translation adjustments

Shareholders' equity

Non-controlling interests

Total equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 8.0  

 40.6  

 270.8  

 (0.2) 

 319.2  

 0.7  

 319.9  

Net income for the period

 

 

 39.9  

 

 39.9  

 (0.6) 

 39.2  

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 (4.4) 

 22.9  

 18.5  

 

 18.5  

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 57.7  

Dividends

 

 

 (21.5) 

 

 (21.5) 

 

 (21.5) 

Other equity transactions

 

 (0.3) 

 (0.3) 

 

 (0.6) 

 0.4  

 (0.2) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2013

 8.0  

 40.3  

 284.5  

 22.7  

 355.5  

 0.5  

 356.0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the period

 

 

 21.9  

 

 21.9  

 0.1  

 22.0  

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 0.9  

 41.6  

 42.5  

 

 42.5  

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 64.5  

Dividends

 

 

 (39.4) 

 

 (39.4) 

 

 (39.4) 

Other equity transactions

 

 (0.1) 

 0.4  

 

 0.3  

 (0.2) 

 0.1  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 8.0  

 40.2  

 268.4  

 64.3  

 380.8  

 0.4  

 381.2  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income for the period

 

 

 (37.5) 

 

 (37.5) 

 0.2  

 (37.3) 

Other comprehensive income1)

 

 

 7.3  

 27.4  

 34.7  

 

 34.7  

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 (2.6) 

Dividends

 

 

 (23.1) 

 

 (23.1) 

 

 (23.1) 

Other equity transactions

 

 (0.1) 

 (0.0) 

 

 (0.1) 

 (0.3) 

 (0.4) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 8.0  

 40.1  

 215.1  

 91.6  

 354.7  

 0.3  

 355.1  

1)Currency translation adjustments of NOK 27.4 billion in 2015 are net of accumulated currency translation gains of NOK 3.3 billion reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income related to the sale of interests in the Shah Deniz project, the South Caucasus Pipeline and the Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG. See note 4 Acquisitions and dispositions./s/ KPMG AS

 

Refer to note 17 Shareholders' equity.

 

Stavanger, Norway

15 March 2018

1621422   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year

(in NOK billion)

Note

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

    

 4.3  

 109.4  

 138.4  

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

11, 12

 133.8  

 101.4  

 72.4  

Exploration expenditures written off

12

 17.1  

 13.7  

 3.1  

(Gains) losses on foreign currency transactions and balances

 

 (0.4) 

 (3.1) 

 4.8  

(Gains) losses from dispositions

4

 (17.3) 

 (12.4) 

 (17.6) 

(Increase) decrease in other items related to operating activities

 

 19.8  

 3.9  

 6.6  

(Increase) decrease in net derivative financial instruments

25

 9.2  

 (2.8) 

 11.7  

Interest received

 

 2.9  

 2.1  

 2.1  

Interest paid

 

 (3.6) 

 (3.4) 

 (2.5) 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities before taxes paid and working capital items

 

 165.8  

 208.8  

 218.8  

 

 

 

 

 

Taxes paid

 

 (65.7) 

 (96.6) 

 (114.2) 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in working capital

 

 8.9  

 14.2  

 (3.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

 

 109.0  

 126.5  

 101.3  

 

 

 

 

 

Additions through business combinations

4

 (3.5) 

 0.0  

 0.0  

Capital expenditures and investments

 

 (124.7) 

 (122.6) 

 (114.9) 

(Increase) decrease in financial investments

 

 (19.8) 

 (12.7) 

 (23.2) 

(Increase) decrease in other non-current items

 

 (0.3) 

 0.8  

 0.6  

Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses

4

 33.2  

 22.6  

 27.1  

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

 (115.1) 

 (112.0) 

 (110.4) 

 

 

 

 

 

New finance debt

18

 32.2  

 20.6  

 62.8  

Repayment of finance debt

 

 (11.4) 

 (9.7) 

 (7.3) 

Dividend paid

17

 (22.9) 

 (33.7) 

 (21.5) 

Net current finance debt and other

 

 (5.5) 

 (0.3) 

 (7.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 (7.5) 

 (23.1) 

 26.6  

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 (13.6) 

 (8.6) 

 17.5  

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 7.1  

 5.7  

 2.9  

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period (net of overdraft)

16

 82.4  

 85.3  

 64.9  

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period (net of overdraft)

16

 75.9  

 82.4  

 85.3  

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year

(in USD million)

Note

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

26

60,971

45,688

57,900

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

12

188

(119)

(29)

Other income

4

27

304

1,770

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

3

61,187

45,873

59,642

 

   

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

   

(28,212)

(21,505)

(26,254)

Operating expenses

   

(8,763)

(9,025)

(10,512)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   

(738)

(762)

(921)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

10, 11

(8,644)

(11,550)

(16,715)

Exploration expenses

11

(1,059)

(2,952)

(3,872)

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income/(loss)

3

13,771

80

1,366

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

8

(351)

(258)

(1,311)

 

   

 

 

 

Income/(loss) before tax

 

13,420

(178)

55

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

9

(8,822)

(2,724)

(5,225)

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

   

4,598

(2,902)

(5,169)

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to equity holders of the company

   

4,590

(2,922)

(5,192)

Attributable to non-controlling interests

   

8

20

22

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share (in USD)

 

1.40

(0.91)

(1.63)

Diluted earnings per share (in USD)

 

1.40

(0.91)

(1.63)

Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (in millions)

 

3,268

3,195

3,179

Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, diluted (in millions)

 

3,288

3,207

3,189

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017143


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

Full year

(in USD million)

Note

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

4,598

(2,902)

(5,169)

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gains/(losses) on defined benefit pension plans

19

172

(503)

1,599

Income tax effect on income and expenses recognised in OCI 1)

 

(38)

129

(461)

Items that will not be reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income

 

134

(374)

1,138

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustments

 

1,710

17

(3,976)

Net gains/(losses) from available for sale financial assets

 

(64)

0

0

Share of OCI from equity accounted investments

 

(40)

0

0

Items that may subsequently be reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income

 

1,607

17

(3,976)

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

1,741

(357)

(2,838)

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

6,339

(3,259)

(8,007)

 

 

 

 

 

Attributable to the equity holders of the company

 

6,331

(3,279)

(8,030)

Attributable to non-controlling interests

 

8

20

22

 

 

 

 

 

1) OCI = Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

1442Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 

 

 

 

 

  At 31 December

(in USD million)

Note

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

10

63,637

59,556

Intangible assets

11

8,621

9,243

Equity accounted investments

12

2,551

2,245

Deferred tax assets

9

2,441

2,195

Pension assets

19

1,306

839

Derivative financial instruments

25

1,603

1,819

Financial investments

13

2,841

2,344

Prepayments and financial receivables

13

912

893

 

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

   

83,911

79,133

 

 

 

 

Inventories

14

3,398

3,227

Trade and other receivables

15

9,425

7,839

Derivative financial instruments

25

159

492

Financial investments

13

8,448

8,211

Cash and cash equivalents

16

4,390

5,090

 

   

 

 

Total current assets

   

25,820

24,859

 

   

 

 

Assets classified as held for sale

4

1,369

537

 

 

 

 

Total assets

   

111,100

104,530

 

 

 

 

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

   

39,861

35,072

Non-controlling interests

   

24

27

 

 

 

 

Total equity

17

39,885

35,099

 

 

 

 

Finance debt

18, 22

24,183

27,999

Deferred tax liabilities

9

7,654

6,427

Pension liabilities

19

3,904

3,380

Provisions

20

15,557

13,406

Derivative financial instruments

25

900

1,420

 

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

   

52,198

52,633

 

 

 

 

Trade, other payables and provisions

21

9,737

9,666

Current tax payable

   

4,057

2,184

Finance debt

18

4,091

3,674

Dividends payable

17

729

712

Derivative financial instruments

25

403

508

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   

19,017

16,744

 

   

 

 

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale

4

0

54

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   

71,214

69,431

 

 

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

   

111,100

104,530


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(in USD million)

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Retained earnings

Currency translation adjustments

Available for sale financial assets

OCI from equity accounted investments

Shareholders' equity

Non-controlling interests

Total equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

1,139

5,714

45,677

(1,305)

0

0

51,225

57

51,282

Net income/(loss)

 

 

(5,192)

 

 

 

(5,192)

22

(5,169)

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

1,138

(3,976)

0

0

(2,838)

 

(2,838)

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,007)

Dividends

 

 

(2,930)

 

 

 

(2,930)

 

(2,930)

Other equity transactions

 

6

(0)

 

 

 

6

(43)

(38)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

1,139

5,720

38,693

(5,281)

0

0

40,271

36

40,307

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

 

(2,922)

 

 

 

(2,922)

20

(2,902)

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

(374)

17

0

0

(357)

 

(357)

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,259)

Dividends

17

887

(2,824)

 

 

 

(1,920)

 

(1,920)

Other equity transactions

 

1

0

 

 

 

2

(30)

(28)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

1,156

6,607

32,573

(5,264)

0

0

35,072

27

35,099

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

 

 

4,590

 

 

 

4,590

8

4,598

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

134

 1,710 1)

(64)

(40)

1,741

 

1,741

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,339

Dividends

24

1,333

(2,891)

 

 

 

(1,534)

 

(1,534)

Other equity transactions

 

(8)

0

 

 

 

(8)

(10)

(18)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

1,180

7,933

34,406

(3,554)

(64)

(40)

39,861

24

39,885

1) Currency translation adjustments year to date includes a loss of USD 294 million directly associated with the sale of interest in Kai Kos Dehseh oil sands project. See note 4 Acquisitions and divestments for information on transaction.

Refer to note 17 Shareholders’ equity and dividends.

1462Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year

(in USD million)

Note

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) before tax

    

13,420

(178)

55

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

10, 11

8,644

11,550

16,715

Exploration expenditures written off

11

(8)

1,800

2,164

(Gains) losses on foreign currency transactions and balances

 

(453)

(137)

1,166

(Gains) losses on sales of assets and businesses

4

395

(110)

(1,716)

(Increase) decrease in other items related to operating activities

 

(391)

1,076

558

(Increase) decrease in net derivative financial instruments

25

(596)

1,307

1,551

Interest received

 

282

280

363

Interest paid

 

(622)

(548)

(443)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities before taxes paid and working capital items

 

20,671

15,040

20,414

 

 

 

 

 

Taxes paid

 

(5,766)

(4,386)

(8,078)

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in working capital

 

(542)

(1,620)

1,292

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities

 

14,363

9,034

13,628

 

 

 

 

 

Additions through business combinations

4

0

0

(398)

Capital expenditures and investments

 

(10,755)

(12,191)

(15,518)

(Increase) decrease in financial investments

 

592

877

(2,813)

(Increase) decrease in other items interest bearing

 

79

107

(22)

Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses

4

406

761

4,249

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

 

(9,678)

(10,446)

(14,501)

 

 

 

 

 

New finance debt

18

0

1,322

4,272

Repayment of finance debt

 

(4,775)

(1,072)

(1,464)

Dividend paid

17

(1,491)

(1,876)

(2,836)

Net current finance debt and other

 

444

(333)

(701)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

18

(5,822)

(1,959)

(729)

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,137)

(3,371)

(1,602)

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

436

(152)

(871)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period (net of overdraft)

16

5,090

8,613

11,085

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period (net of overdraft)

16

4,390

5,090

8,613

Cash and cash equivalentsincluded a include bank overdraftoverdrafts of NOK 0.1 billion at 31 December 2015, a bank overdraft of NOK 0.7 billion at 31 December 2014 and a bank overdraft that was rounded to zero at 31 December 20132017, .zero at 31 December 2016 and USD 10 million at 31 December 2015.

Interest paid  in cash flows provided by operating activities is excluding capitalised interest of NOK 3.2 billionUSD 454 million at 31 December 2015, NOK 1.6 billion at
31 December 2014 and NOK 1.1 billion2017, USD 355 million at 31 December 2013.2016 and USD 392 million at 31 December 2015. Capitalised interest is included in Capital expenditures and investments in cash flows used in investing activities.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    163147


 

8.1 Notes to the Consolidated financial statements

 

1 Organisation

 

Statoil ASA, originally Den Norske Stats Oljeselskap AS, was founded in 1972 and is incorporated and domiciled in Norway.Norway. The address of its registered office is Forusbeen 50, N-4035 Stavanger, Norway.Norway.

 

Statoil ASA isASA’s shares are listed on the Oslo Børs (Norway)(OSL, Norway) and the New York Stock Exchange (USA)(NYSE, USA).

 

The Statoil group's business consists principally of the exploration, production, transportation, refining and marketing of petroleum and petroleum-derived products and other forms of energy.

 

All the Statoil group's oil and gas activities and net assets on the Norwegian continental shelf are owned by Statoil Petroleum AS, a 100% owned operating subsidiary. Statoil Petroleum AS is co-obligor or guarantor of certain debt obligations of Statoil ASA.

 

The Consolidated financial statements of Statoil for the full year 20152017 were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the board of directors on 914 March 2016.2018.

 

2 Significant accounting policies

 

Statement of compliance

The Consolidated financial statements of Statoil ASA and its subsidiaries (Statoil) have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and also comply with IFRSs as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), effective at 31 December 2015.2017.

 

Basis of preparation

The financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis with some exceptions, as detailed in the accounting policies set out below. TheseThe policies described in the main part of this note are the ones in effect at the balance sheet date, and these policies have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these Consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts in the comparable years have been restated to conform to current year presentation. The subtotals and totals in some of the tables may not equal the sum of the amounts shown due to rounding.

 

Operating related expenses in the Consolidated statement of income are presented as a combination of function and nature in conformity with industry practice.practice. Purchases [net of inventory variation] and Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses are presented in separate lines bybased on their nature, while Operating expenses and Selling, general and administrative expenses as well as Exploration expenses are presented on a functional basis. Significant expenses such as salaries, pensions, etc. are presented by their nature in the notes to the Consolidated financial statements.

Standards, and amendments to standards, and interpretations of standards, issued but not yet adopted

At the date of these Consolidated financial statements, the following standards, and amendments to standards and interpretations of standards applicable to Statoil have been issued, but were not yet effective:

·IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 will be implemented by Statoil on the effective date 1 January 2018. The standard replaces IAS 39 Financial instruments: Recognition and Measurement. Statoil will implement IFRS 9 retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognised at the date of initial application. The impact of the IFRS 9 implementation on Statoil’s equity is immaterial.

Portions of Statoil’s cash equivalents and current financial investments tied to liquidity management, which under IAS 39 are classified as held for trading and reflected at fair value through profit and loss, will under IFRS 9 be measured at amortised cost, based on an evaluation of the contractual terms and the business model applied. For certain financial assets currently classified as Available for sale (AFS), changes in fair value which are currently reflected in OCI, will be reflected in profit and loss under IFRS 9. No major changes are currently deemed necessary for Statoil’s expected loss recognition process to satisfy IFRS 9’s financial asset impairment requirements.

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers issued in May 2014 and, following an amendment to
IFRS 15, which will be implemented by Statoil on the standard issued in September 2015, effective fromdate 1 January 2018, covers the recognition of such revenue in the financial statements and related disclosure and will replacedisclosure. IFRS 15 replaces existing revenue recognition guidance, including IAS 18 Revenue. The standardIFRS 15 requires identification of the performance obligations for the transfer of goods and services in each contract with customers. Revenue will be recognised upon satisfaction of the performance obligations infor the amounts that reflect the consideration to which the companyStatoil expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.

1482Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


IFRS 15 will principally impact the Marketing, Midstream & Processing segment (MMP), which accounts for the majority of Statoil’s sales to customers, and which is responsible for the marketing and sale of the Norwegian State’s direct financial interest’s (SDFI’s) petroleum volumes. To a lesser extent, the segments Exploration & Production International (E&P International) and Exploration & Production Norway (E&P Norway) are however also affected.

The impact on Statoil’s equity of the implementation of IFRS 15 is immaterial. Mainly on the basis of the limited implementation impact, Statoil will implement IFRS 15 retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognised at the date of initial application. IFRS 15 will require updated disclosures, in particular related to the distinction between revenue from contracts with customers and other revenue, and disaggregation of revenue streams. Such disclosures will be provided based on consideration of the level of detail necessary. The most significant accounting evaluations and conclusions related to the implementation of IFRS 15 in Statoil are summarised below.

Sale and transportation of goods;
Under IFRS 15, revenue from the sale and transportation of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products and other merchandise will be recognised when a customer obtains control of the goods, which normally will be when title passes at point of delivery of the goods, based on the contractual terms of the agreements. Each such sale normally represents one performance obligation, which in the case of natural gas sales are completed over time in line with the delivery of the actual physical quantities. A number of bi-lateral long-term contracts, mainly for the sale of natural gas, as well as certain spot and term contracts, represent the sale of non-financial items that may be settled net in cash, but which have been entered into for the purpose of delivery of non-financial commodity items in accordance with Statoil’s expected purchase, sale or usage requirements.Statoil consequently will apply IFRS 9’s “own use” exemption for such contracts, and these physical sales will be accounted for as revenue from contracts with customers.

In some sales of goods, such as certain sales of crude oil, Statoil may provide transport services after control of the goods has been transferred to the customer. Following implementation of IFRS 15, such transport, which previously was considered part of a single sale of goods transaction, will be considered to be a distinct service that is completed over time and is distinct from the good sold. These transport services will consequently be recognised separately and be combined with other transport revenues. The impact from the resulting immaterial timing differences constitutes the only identified IFRS 15 implementation impact with a net effect on equity and net operating profit in Statoil.

Marketing and sale of the Norwegian State’s (the State’s) share of crude oil and natural gas production from the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS);
Statoil has considered whether it acts as the principal in these transactions under IFRS 15, i.e. whether it controls the State’s volumes prior to onwards sales to third party customers. Statoil’s sales of the State’s natural gas volumes are performed for the State’s account and risk, and although Statoil has been granted the ability to direct the use of the volumes, all the benefits from the sales of these volumes flow to the State. On that basis, Statoil is not considered the principal in the sale of the SDFI’s natural gas volumes. In the sales of the State-originated crude oil, Statoil also directs the use of the volumes. However, although certain benefits from these sales subsequently flow to the State, Statoil purchases the crude oil volumes from the State and obtains substantially all the remaining benefits. Statoil therefore is considered the principal in the crude oil sales. The accounting for Statoil’s sale of the SDFI’s natural gas and crude oil under IFRS 15 will consequently not lead to changes compared to the practice under IAS 18.

Other identified differences;
Certain items, which have previously been classified as Revenues in the Consolidated statement of income, will not qualify as revenue from contracts with customers under IFRS 15. These include taxes paid in kind under certain production sharing agreements (PSAs), and the reflection of commodity-based derivatives connected with sales contracts or revenue-related risk management. Adjustments for imbalances between oil and gas production and sales, following Statoil’s transition from the sales method to imbalances accounting on 1 January 2018 (see the item “
Voluntary change in significant accounting policies decided upon, but not yet adopted” below), will also not qualify as revenue from contracts with customers under IFRS 15. These items however still either represent a form of revenue or are closely connected to revenue transactions, and they will be reflected as Other revenue following the IFRS 15 implementation. Statoil will combine ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’ and ‘Other revenue’ into a single line item, Revenues, in the Consolidated statement of income, and will disclose the relevant disaggregation in the notes to the Consolidated financial statements. In addition, Statoil will reclassify the impact of certain commodity-based earn-out agreements and contingent consideration elements, which previously have been reflected under Revenues, to Other income. Total revenues and other income in the Statement of income will consequently not be impacted by this reclassification.

IFRS 16 Leases

IFRS 16, effective from 1 January 2019, covers the recognition of leases and related disclosure in the financial statements, and will replace IAS 17 Leases. The new standard defines a lease as a contract that conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. In the financial statement of lessees, IFRS 16 requires recognition in the balance sheet for each contract that meets its definition of a lease as right-of-use asset and lease liability, while lease payments are to be reflected as interest expense and a reduction of lease liabilities. The right-of-use assets are to be depreciated in accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment over the shorter of each contract’s term and the assets’ useful life. IFRS 16 will also lead to changes in the classification of lease-related payments in the statement of cash flows, and the portion of lease payments representing payments of lease liabilities will be classified as cash flows used in financing activities. The standard consequently implies a significant change in lessees’ accounting for leases currently defined as operating leases under IAS 17 and for other contracts that do not meet this definition but are considered to be leases under IFRS 16, impacting both the balance sheet, the statement of income and the statement of cash flows.

As a practical expedient, IFRS 16 allows for contracts already classified either as leases under IAS 17 or as non-lease service arrangements, to maintain their respective classifications upon the implementation of IFRS 16. Statoil expects to apply this “grandfathering” transition option.

IFRS 16 requires adoption either on a full retrospective basis, or on the basis ofretrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially recognising the standard as an adjustment to retained earnings at the date of initial application (“the modified retrospective method”), and in the latter case allows a number of practical

Statoil, Annual Report on retained earnings.Form 20-F 2017149


expedients in transitioning existing leases at the time of initial application. Statoil anticipates applying the modified retrospective method in the implementation of IFRS 16.

Implementation of IFRS 16 will affect all Statoil’s segments. Statoil will adopt IFRS 16 on 1 January 2019, and is still in the process of evaluating the potentialimpact of the standard. The actual impact on the Consolidated financial statements of applying IFRS 16 will depend on future economic conditions, including Statoil’s borrowing rate and the composition of Statoil’s lease portfolio at implementation. IFRS 16 involves several implementation choices and interpretations which may also significantly impact Statoil’s Consolidated financial statements. The accounting issues which at this stage are expected to most significantly affect the implementation of IFRS 16 in Statoil, as well as their expected impact where this can currently be determined, are summarised below. In addition to these issues, Statoil has identified several other leasing related interpretations and policy decisions which are under evaluation. Work is continuing in order to determine the impact and the proper accounting for all identified issues, but the assessments have not yet been concluded. Statoil is consequently not yet in a position to determine the expected impact of IFRS 15,16 on its Consolidated financial statements.

Distinguishing operators and joint operations as lessees, including sublease considerations;
IFRS 16 establishes that when a lease contract is entered into by a joint arrangement, or on behalf of a joint arrangement, the joint arrangement is considered to be the customer, and hence the lessee, in the contract. In the oil and gas industry, where activity frequently is carried out through joint arrangements or similar arrangements, the application of this IFRS 16 requirement depends on evaluations of whether the joint arrangement or its operator is the lessee in each lease agreement. In many cases where an operator is the sole signatory to a contract to lease an asset to be used in the activities of a specific joint operation, the operator does so implicitly or explicitly on behalf of the joint arrangement. In certain jurisdictions, and importantly for Statoil this includes the NCS, the concessions granted by the authorities establish both a right and an obligation for the operator to enter into necessary agreements in the name of the joint operations (licences). As is the customary norm in upstream activities operated through joint arrangements, the operator will manage the lease, pay the lessor, and subsequently re-bill the partners for their share of the lease costs. In each such instance, it is necessary to determine whether the operator is the sole lessee in the arrangement, and if so, whether the billings to partners may represent sub-leases, or whether it is in fact the joint arrangement which is the lessee, with each participant accounting for its proportionate share of the lease. Depending on facts and circumstances in each case, the conclusions reached may vary between contracts and legal jurisdictions. This issue may materially impact the financial statements of Statoil both as an operator and joint operation participant in the oil and gas industry.

Separation of lease and non-lease components;
IFRS 16 allows for additional services and non-lease components included in lease contracts to be accounted for either separately, or as part of the lease. The standard’s presumption is that non-lease components should be accounted for separately, while accounting for such components as part of a lease is an exemption that must be taken consistently by class of underlying asset.In the case of significant non-lease components in contracts containing leases, the choice of accounting policy may impact the financial statements significantly, as it entails choosing between expensing service elements as a form of operating cost as incurred, or reflecting them as part of right of use assets (with a corresponding increase in the lease liabilities), with related amortisation and financial expenses. Many of Statoil’s lease contracts, such as rig and vessel leases, involve a number of additional services and components, including personnel cost, maintenance, drilling related activities, and other items. For a number of contracts, the additional services may represent a not inconsiderable portion of the total contract value, and such additional services are not always identified and separately priced. The full extent of non-lease components in Statoil’s contracts has yet to be established, and Statoil has not yet determined its adoption date or its implementation methodwhether it will account for additional services as parts of the standardlease, and if so, for which underlying classes of assets.

·Leases applied in activities that are capitalised;The amendment to IFRS 11 Accounting for Acquisitions
In exploration activities, direct costs are capitalised until the result of Interests in Joint Operations, issued in May 2014the exploration has been evaluated. In the development phase of projects, direct costs are likewise capitalised and effective from 1 January 2016, establishes requirements fornormally become part of Property, plant and equipment (PP&E). During upstream production activities, asset enhancements such as the accounting for acquisitionsdrilling of interests in joint operations in which the activity constitutes a business. The amendment is to be applied prospectively.production wells are also capitalised. In all these activities, Statoil has adopted the amendment on the effective date

·IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, issued in its final form in July 2014will frequently employ leased drilling rigs and effective from 1 January 2018, will replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. IFRS 9 introduces a new model for classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, a reformed approach to hedge accounting, and a more forward-looking impairment model. The standard’s transition provisions partly require retrospective adoption, and partly prospective adoption.other leased assets. Statoil is in the process of evaluating how leases under IFRS 16 will be reflected when leased assets are used in an activity for which the potentialcosts are capitalised.

Evaluating the impact of IFRS 9, and has not yet determined its adoption dateoption periods for the standardlease terms;
The term of a lease determines the period of time for which cash flow will be discounted and reflected in the balance sheet. Under IFRS 16 the lease term therefore impacts the recognised amounts of right of use assets and lease liabilities. Many of Statoil’s major leases, such as leases of vessels, rigs and buildings, include term options. In applying IFRS 16 it is of increasing importance for Statoil to determine whether each lease contract’s term options should be considered to be reasonably certain to be exercised. Such evaluations will be made at commencement of the leases and subsequently when facts and circumstances require it. In Statoil’s view, the term ‘reasonably certain’ implies a probability level significantly higher than ‘probable’, and this will be reflected in Statoil’s ongoing evaluations.

 

Distinguishing fixed and variable lease payment elements;
Under IFRS 16, fixed and in-substance fixed lease payments are to be included in the commencement date computation of a lease liability, while variable payments dependent on use of the asset are not. Particularly as regards drilling rig leases, Statoil’s lease contracts may include fixed rates for when the asset in question is in operation, and alternative, lower rates (“stand-by rates”) for periods where the asset is idle, but still under contract. Statoil is currently evaluating the appropriate rates to be reflected in the lease liability.

Use of the standard’s short-term lease exemption;
As a practical expedient, IFRS 16 allows an entity not to capitalise short term leases on its balance sheet. The choice must be made by class of underlying asset. The practical expedient provides a simplification, but will also result in less comparability in the Statement of income, as the short-term lease

1641502   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

·expenses will be presented as a form of operating expenses, while the cost for long-term leases will be presented as interest expenses and depreciation. Statoil has not yet determined whether the exemption will be applied, and if so, for which classes of underlying assets.

Other standards, amendments to standards and interpretations of standards

The amendments to IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, issued in September 2014 and, following an amendment issued in December 2015, effective from a future date to be determined by the IASB, establish requirements for the accounting for sales or contributions of assets between an investor and its associate or joint venture. Whether or not the assets are housed in a subsidiary, a full gain or loss will be recognised in the statement of income when the transaction involves assets that constitute a business, whereas a partial gain or loss will be recognised when the transaction involves assets that do not constitute a business. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Statoil has not determined an adoption date for the amendments

·IFRS 16 Leases, issued in January 2016 and effective from 1 January 2019, covers the recognition of leases and related disclosure in the financial statements, and will replace IAS 17 Leases. In the financial statement of lessees, the new standard requires recognition of all contracts that qualify under its definition of a lease as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities in the balance sheet, while lease payments are to be reflected as interest expense and reduction of lease liabilities. The right-of-use assets are to be depreciated in accordance with IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment over the shorter of each contract’s term and the assets’ useful life. The standard consequently implies a significant change in lessees’ accounting for leases currently defined as operating leases under IAS 17, both as regards impact on the balance sheet and the statement of income. IFRS 16 defines a lease as a contract that conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. While this definition is not dissimilar to that of IAS 17, it would have required further evaluation of each contract to determine whether all leases included in Note 22 Leases of these financial statements, or contracts currently not defined as leases, would qualify as leases under the new standard. The standard introduces new requirements both as regards establishing the term of a lease and the related discounted cash flows that determine the amount of a lease liability to be recognised. The standard requires adoption either on a full retrospective basis, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially recognising the standard as an adjustment to retained earnings at the date of initial application, and if so with a number of practical expedients in transitioning existing leases at the time of initial application. Statoil is in the early phase of evaluating the impact of IFRS 16, and has not yet determined its adoption date, its implementation method, or the expected impact of the standard on the Consolidated financial statements

·The disclosure initiative amendments to IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows, issued in January 2016 and effective from 1 January 2017, establishes certain additional requirements as to disclosure of changes in financing liabilities. Statoil will implement the amendments on the effective dateamendments.

 

Other standards, and amendments to standards, and interpretations of standards, issued but not yet effective, are either not expected to impact Statoil’s Consolidated financial statements materially, or are not expected to be relevant to Statoil's Consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

 

Voluntary change in significant accounting policies decided upon, but not yet adopted

With effect from 1 January 2018, Statoil will change its policy for recognition of revenue from the production of oil and gas properties in which Statoil shares an interest with other companies. Currently Statoil recognises revenue on the basis of volumes lifted and sold to customers during the period (the sales method). Under the new method, Statoil will recognise revenues according to Statoil’s ownership in producing fields, where the accounting for the imbalances will be presented as other revenue. This voluntary change in policy is made because it better reflects Statoil’s operational performance, and also increases comparability with the financial reporting of Statoil’s peers. The change in policy affects the timing of revenue recognition from oil and gas production, however the impact on Statoil’s equity upon implementation is immaterial.

Changes in significant accounting policies in the current period

With effect from 1 January 2017, Statoil presents net interest costs related to its defined benefit pension plans within Net financial items. These expenses were previously included in the Consolidated statement of income as part of pension cost within net operating income/(loss). The policy change better aligns the classification of the interest costs with their nature, as the benefit plan is closed to new members and now increasingly represents a financial exposure to Statoil. The change in presentation also impacts the gain or loss from changes in the fair value of Statoil’s notional contribution pension plans. The impact on the net operating income at implementation and for comparative periods presented in these financial statements is immaterial.

Basis of consolidation

The Consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Statoil ASA and its subsidiaries and include Statoil’s interest in jointly controlled and equity accounted investments.

 

Subsidiaries

Entities are determined to be controlled by Statoil, and consolidated in Statoil's financial statements, when Statoil has power over the entity, ability to use that power to affect the entity's returns, and exposure to, or rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity.

 

All intercompany balances and transactions, including unrealised profits and losses arising from Statoil's internal transactions, have been eliminated in full.

Non-controlling interests are presented separately within equity in the balance sheet.

 

Joint operations and similar arrangements, joint ventures and associates

A joint arrangement is present where Statoil holds a long-term interest which is jointly controlled by Statoil and one or more other venturers under a contractual arrangement in which decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Such joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures.

 

The parties to a joint operation have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, relating to their respective share of the joint arrangement. In determining whether the terms of contractual arrangements and other facts and circumstances lead to a classification as joint operations, Statoil in particular considers the nature of products and markets of the arrangement and whether the substance of their agreements is that the parties involved have rights to substantially all the arrangement's assets. Statoil accounts for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses relating to its interests in joint operations in accordance with the principles applicable to those particular assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Normally this leads to accounting for the joint operation in a manner similar to the previous proportionate consolidation method.

 

Those of Statoil's exploration and production licence activities that are within the scope of IFRS 11 Joint Arrangementshave been classified as joint operations. A considerable number of Statoil's unincorporated joint exploration and production activities are conducted through arrangements that are not jointly controlled, either because unanimous consent is not required among all parties involved, or no single group of parties has joint control over the activity. Licence activities where control can be achieved through agreement between more than one combination of involved parties are considered to be outside the scope of IFRS 11, and these activities are accounted for on a pro-rata basis using Statoil's ownership share. In determining whether each separate arrangement related to Statoil's unincorporated joint exploration and production licence activities is within or outside the scope of IFRS 11, Statoil considers the terms of relevant licence agreements, governmental concessions and other legal arrangements impacting how and by whom each arrangement is controlled. Subsequent changes in the ownership shares and number of licence participants, transactions involving licence shares, or changes in the terms of relevant agreements may lead to changes in Statoil's evaluation of control and impact a licence arrangement's classification in relation to IFRS 11 in

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015165


Statoil's Consolidated financial statements. Currently there are no significant differences in Statoil's accounting for unincorporated licence arrangements whether in scope of IFRS 11 or not.

 

Joint ventures, in which Statoil has rights to the net assets, are accounted for using the equity method.

 

Investments in companies in which Statoil has neither control nor joint control, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, are classified as associates and areEquity accounted for usinginvestments.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017151


Under the equity method.method, the investment is carried on the balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in Statoil’s share of net assets of the entity, less distributions received and less any impairment in value of the investment. Goodwill may arise as the surplus of the cost of investment over Statoil’s share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the joint venture or associate. Such goodwill is recorded within the corresponding investment. The Consolidated statement of income reflects Statoil’s share of the results after tax of an equity-accounted entity, adjusted to account for depreciation, amortisation and any impairment of the equity-accounted entity’s assets based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. Where material differences in accounting policies arise, adjustments are made to the financial statements of equity-accounted entities in order to bring the accounting policies used into line with Statoil’s. Material unrealised gains on transactions between Statoil and its equity-accounted entities are eliminated to the extent of Statoil’s interest in each equity-accounted entity. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Statoil assesses investments in equity-accounted entities for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

 

Statoil as operator of joint operations and similar arrangements

Indirect operating expenses such as personnel expenses are accumulated in cost pools. These costs are allocated on an hourshours’ incurred basis to operating segmentsbusiness areas and Statoil operated joint operations under IFRS 11 and to similar arrangements (licences) outside the scope of IFRS 11. Costs allocated to the other partners' share of operated joint operations and similar arrangements reduce the costs in the Consolidated statement of income. Only Statoil's share of the statement of income and balance sheet items related to Statoil operated joint operations and similar arrangements are reflected in the Consolidated statement of income and the Consolidated balance sheet.

 

Reportable segments

Statoil identifies its operating segmentsbusiness areas on the basis of those components of Statoil that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker, Statoil's corporate executive committee (CEC). Statoil combines operating segmentsbusiness areas when these satisfy relevant aggregation criteria.

 

Statoil's accounting policies as described in this note also apply to the specific financial information included in reportable segments relatedsegments-related disclosure in these Consolidated financial statements.

 

Foreign currency translation

In preparing the financial statements of the individual entities, transactions in foreign currencies (those other than functional currency) are translated at the foreign exchange rate at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency at the foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognised in the Consolidated statement of income as foreign exchange gains or losses within Netnet financial items. Foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of estimate-based provisions, however, generally are accounted for as part of the change in the underlying estimate and as such may be included within the relevant operating expense or income tax sections of the Consolidated statement of income depending on the nature of the provision. Non-monetary assets that are measured at historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transactions.

 

Presentation currency

For the purpose of the Consolidated financial statements, the statement of income, the balance sheet and the cash flows of each entity are translated from the functional currency into the presentation currency, Norwegian kroner (NOK).USD. The assets and liabilities of entities whose functional currencies are other than NOK, including Statoil's parent company Statoil ASA whose functional currency is United States dollar (USD),USD, are translated into NOKUSD at the foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date. The revenues and expenses of such entities are translated using the foreign exchange rates on the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation from functional currency to presentation currency are recognised separately in Other comprehensive income (OCI). The cumulative amount of such translation differences relating to an entity and previously recognised in OCI, is reclassified to the Consolidated statement of income and reflected as a part of the gain or loss on disposal of that entity.

 

Business combinations

Determining whether an acquisition meets the definition of a business combination requires judgement to be applied on a case by case basis. Acquisitions are assessed under the relevant IFRS criteria to establish whether the transaction represents a business combination or an asset purchase. Depending on the specific facts, acquisitions of exploration and evaluation licences for which a development decision has not yet been made, have largely been concluded to represent asset purchases.

 

Business combinations, except for transactions between entities under common control, are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquired identifiable tangible and intangible assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are measured at their fair values at the date of the acquisition. Acquisition costs incurred are expensed under Selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

Revenue recognition

Revenues associated with sale and transportation of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products and other merchandise are recognised when risk passes to the customer, which is normally when title passes at the point of delivery of the goods, based on the contractual terms of the agreements.

 

Revenues from the production of oil and gas properties in which Statoil shares an interest with other companies are recognised on the basis of volumes lifted and sold to customers during the period (the sales method). Where Statoil has lifted and sold more than the ownership interest, an accrual is recognised for the cost of the overlift. Where Statoil has lifted and sold less than the ownership interest, costs are deferred for the underlift.

 

Revenue is presented net of customs, excise taxes and royalties paid in-kind on petroleum products. Revenue is presented gross of in-kind payments of amounts representing income tax.

1661522   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Sales and purchases of physical commodities, which are not settled net, are presented on a gross basis as Revenuesrevenues and Purchasespurchases [net of inventory variation] in the statement of income. Activities related to trading and commodity-based derivative instruments are reported on a net basis, with the margin included in Revenues.revenues.

 

Transactions with the Norwegian State

Statoil markets and sells the Norwegian State's share of oil and gas production from the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). The Norwegian State's participation in petroleum activities is organised through the State's direct financial interest (SDFI).SDFI. All purchases and sales of the SDFI's oil production are classified as Purchasespurchases [net of inventory variation] and Revenues,revenues, respectively. Statoil sells, in its own name, but for the Norwegian State's account and risk, the State's production of natural gas. These sales and related expenditures refunded by the Norwegian State are presented net in the Consolidated financial statements.

Employee benefits

Wages, salaries, bonuses, social security contributions, paid annual leave and sick leave are accrued in the period in which the associated services are rendered by employees of Statoil.

 

Research and development

Statoil undertakes research and development both on a funded basis for licence holders and on an unfunded basis for projects at its own risk. Statoil's own share of the licence holders' funding and the total costs of the unfunded projects are considered for capitalisation under the applicable IFRS requirements. Subsequent to initial recognition, any capitalised development costs are reported at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.

 

Income tax

Income tax in the Consolidated statement of income comprises current and deferred tax expense. Income taxis recognised in the Consolidated statement of income except when it relates to items recognised in OCI.

 

Current tax consists of the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year and any adjustment to tax payable for previous years. Uncertain tax positions and potential tax exposures are analysed individually, and the best estimate of the probable amount for liabilities to be paid (unpaid potential tax exposure amounts, including penalties) and for assets to be received (disputed tax positions for which payment has already been made) in each case is recognised within current tax or deferred tax as appropriate. Interest income and interest expenses relating to tax issues are estimated and recognised in the period in which they are earned or incurred, and are presented within Netnet financial itemsin the Consolidated statement of income. Uplift benefit on the NCS is recognised when the deduction is included in the current year tax return and impacts taxes payable.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, subject to the initial recognition exemption. The amount of deferred tax is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable income will be available against which the asset can be utilised. In order for a deferred tax asset to be recognised based on future taxable income, convincing evidence is required, taking into account the existence of contracts, production of oil or gas in the near future based on volumes of proved reserves, observable prices in active markets, expected volatility of trading profits, expected currency rate movements and similar facts and circumstances.

 

Oil and gas exploration, evaluation and development expenditures

Statoil uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas exploration costs. Expenditures to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties and to drill and equip exploratory wells are capitalised as exploration and evaluation expenditures within Intangibleintangible assetsuntil the well is complete and the results have been evaluated, or there is any other indicator of a potential impairment. Exploration wells that discover potentially economic quantities of oil and natural gas remain capitalised as intangible assets during the evaluation phase of the find. This evaluation is normally finalised within one year after well completion. If, following the evaluation, the exploratory well has not found potentially commercial quantities of hydrocarbons, the previously capitalised costs are evaluated for derecognition or tested for impairment. Geological and geophysical costs and other exploration and evaluation expenditures are expensed as incurred.

 

Capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditures, including expenditures to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties, related to offshore wells that find proved reserves are transferred from exploration expenditures and acquisition costs - oil and gas prospects (Intangible(intangible assets) to Property,property, plant and equipmentat the time of sanctioning of the development project. For onshore wells where no sanction is required, the transfer of acquisition cost – oil and gas prospects (Intangible(intangible assets) to Property,property, plant and equipment occurs at the time when a well is ready for production.

 

For exploration and evaluation asset acquisitions (farm-in arrangements) in which Statoil has made arrangements to fund a portion of the selling partner's (farmor's) exploration and/or future development expenditures (carried interests), these expenditures are reflected in the Consolidated financial statements as and when the exploration and development work progresses. Statoil reflects exploration and evaluation asset dispositions (farm-out arrangements) on a historical cost basis with no gain or loss recognition.

 

A gain or loss related to a post-tax based disposition of assets on the NCS includes the release of tax liabilities previously computed and recognised related to the assets in question. The resulting gross gain or loss is recognised in full in Otherother incomein the Consolidated statement of income.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    167153


 

Consideration from the sale of an undeveloped part of an onshore asset reduces the carrying amount of the asset. The part of the consideration that exceeds the carrying amount of the asset, if any, is reflected in the Consolidated statement of income under Other incomeother income.

 

Exchanges (swaps) of exploration and evaluation assets are accounted for at the carrying amounts of the assets given up with no gain or loss recognition.

 

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment is reflected at cost, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into operation, the initial estimate of an asset retirement obligation, if any, exploration costs transferred from intangible assets and, for qualifying assets, borrowing costs. Property, plant and equipment include costs relating to expenditures incurred under the terms of profit sharing agreements (PSAs)PSAs in certain countries, and which qualify for recognition as assets of Statoil. State-owned entities in the respective countries, however, normally hold the legal title to such PSA-based property, plant and equipment.

 

Exchanges of assets are measured at the fair value of the asset given up, unless the fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is measurable with sufficient reliability.

 

Expenditure on major maintenance refits or repairs comprises the cost of replacement assets or parts of assets, inspection costs and overhaul costs. Where an asset or part of an asset is replaced and it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to Statoil, the expenditure is capitalised. Inspection and overhaul costs, associated with regularly scheduled major maintenance programsprogrammes planned and carried out at recurring intervals exceeding one year, are capitalised and amortised over the period to the next scheduled inspection and overhaul. All other maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

 

Capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditures, development expenditure on the construction, installation or completion of infrastructure facilities such as platforms, pipelines and the drilling of production wells, and field-dedicated transport systems for oil and gas are capitalised as producing oil and gas properties within Property,property, plant and equipment. Such capitalised costs, when designed for significantly larger volumes than the reserves from already developed and producing wells, are depreciated using the unit of production method based on proved reserves expected to be recovered from the area during the concession or contract period. Depreciation of production wells uses the unit of production method based on proved developed reserves, and capitalised acquisition costs of proved properties are depreciated using the unit of production method based on total proved reserves. In the rare circumstances where the use of proved reserves fails to provide an appropriate measure of depreciation,basis reflecting the pattern in which the asset’s future economic benefits are expected to be consumed, a more appropriate reserve estimate is used. Depreciation of other assets and transport systems used by several fields is calculated on the basis of their estimated useful lives, normally using the straight-line method. Each part of an item of property, plant and equipment with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost of the item is depreciated separately. For exploration and production assets, Statoil has established separate depreciation categories which as a minimum distinguish between platforms, pipelines and wells.

 

The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are reviewed on an annual basis, and changes in useful lives are accounted for prospectively. An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognisedde-recognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in Otherother income or Operatingoperating expenses, respectively, in the period the item is derecognised.de-recognised.

 

Assets classified as held for sale

Non-current assets are classified separately as held for sale in the balance sheet when their carrying amount will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is met only when the sale is highly probable, the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition, and management is committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification. Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale, and expected to be included as part of the sale transaction, are correspondingly also classified separately. Once classified as held for sale, property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are not subject to depreciation or amortisation. The net assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

Leases

Leases for which Statoil assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are reflected as finance leases. When an asset leased by a joint operation or similar arrangement to which Statoil is a party qualifies as a finance lease, or when such an asset is leased by Statoil as operator directly on behalf of a joint operation or similar arrangement, Statoil reflects its proportionate share of the leased asset and related obligations. Finance leases are classified in the Consolidated balance sheet within Property,property, plant and equipment and Financefinance debt. All other leases are classified as operating leases, and the costs are charged to the relevant operating expense related caption on a straight linestraight-line basis over the lease term, unless another basis is more representative of the benefits of the lease to Statoil.

 

Statoil distinguishes between lease and capacity contracts. Lease contracts provide the right to use a specific asset for a period of time, while capacity contracts confer on Statoil the right to and the obligation to pay for certain volume capacity availability related to transport, terminal use, storage, etc. Such capacity contracts that do not involve specified assets or that do not involve substantially all the capacity of an undivided interest in a specific asset are not considered by Statoil to qualify as leases for accounting purposes. Capacity payments are reflected as Operatingoperating expensesin the Consolidated statement of income in the period for which the capacity contractually is available to Statoil.

 

Intangible assets including goodwill


Intangible assets are stated at cost, less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Intangible assets include acquisition cost for oil and gas prospects, expenditures on the exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources, goodwill and other intangible assets.

 

Intangible assets relating to expenditures on the exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources are not amortised. When the decision to develop a particular area is made, its intangible exploration and evaluation assets are reclassified to Property,property, plant and equipment.

 

168Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Goodwill is initially measured at the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised for any non-controlling interest over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at the acquisition date. Goodwill acquired is allocated to each cash generating unit, or group of units, expected to benefit from the combination'scombination’s synergies. Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses.

 

Financial assets

Financial assets are initially recognised at fair value when Statoil becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the asset. For additional information on fair value methods, refer to the Measurement of fair values section below. The subsequent measurement of the financial assets depends on which category they have been classified into at inception.

 

At initial recognition, Statoil classifies its financial assets into the following three main categories: Financial investments at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, and available-for-sale (AFS) financial assets. The first main category, financial investments at fair value through profit or loss, further consists of two sub-categories: Financial assets held for trading and financial assets that on initial recognition are designated as fair value through profit and loss. The latter approach may also be referred to as the fair value option.

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, current balances with banks and similar institutions, and short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in fair value and have a maturity of three months or less from the acquisition date.

 

Trade receivables are carried at the original invoice amount less a provision for doubtful receivables which is made when there is objective evidence that Statoil will be unable to recover the balances in full.

 

AFS financial assets are carried at fair value in the balance sheet, with changes in fair value initially recognised directly in Other comprehensive income/(loss). If the investment is de-recognised or determined to be impaired, the cumulative change in fair value previously reflected in Other comprehensive income/(loss) is recognised in the statement of income.

A significant part of Statoil's investments in treasury bills, commercial papers, bonds and listed equity securities is managed together as an investment portfolio of Statoil's captive insurance company and is held in order to comply with specific regulations for capital retention. The investment portfolio is managed and evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with an investment strategy and is accounted for using the fair value option with changes in fair value recognised through profit or loss.

 

Financial assets are presented as current if they contractually will expire or otherwise are expected to be recovered within 12 months after the balance sheet date, or if they are held for the purpose of being traded. Financial assets and financial liabilities are shown separately in the Consolidated balance sheet, unless Statoil has both a legal right and a demonstrable intention to net settle certain balances payable to and receivable from the same counterparty, in which case they are shown net in the balance sheet.sheet.

 

Inventories

InventoriesCommodity inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is determined by the first-in first-out method and comprises direct purchase costs, cost of production, transportation and manufacturing expenses. Inventories of drilling and spare parts are reflected according to the weighted average method.

 

Impairment

Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets other than goodwill

Statoil assesses individual assets or groups of assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Assets are grouped into cash generating units (CGUs) which are the smallest identifiable groups of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other groups of assets. Normally, separate CGUs are individual oil and gas fields or plants. Each unconventional asset play is considered a single CGU when no cash inflows from parts of the play can be reliably identified as being largely independent of the cash inflows from other parts of the play. In impairment evaluations, the carrying amounts of CGUs are determined on a basis consistent with that of the recoverable amount. In Statoil's line of business, judgement is involved in determining what constitutes a CGU. Development in production, infrastructure solutions, markets, product pricing, management actions and other factors may over time lead to changes in CGUs such as the division of one original CGU into several.

 

In assessing whether a write-down of the carrying amount of a potentially impaired asset is required, the asset's carrying amount is compared to the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its fair value less cost of disposal and its value in use. Fair value less cost of disposal is determined based on comparable recent arm’s length market transactions, or based on Statoil’s estimate of the price that would be received for the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants. Such fair value estimates are mainly based on discounted cash flow models, using assumed market participants’ assumptions, but may also reflect market multiples observed from comparable market transactions or independent third-

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017155


party valuations. Value in use is determined using a discounted cash flow model. The estimated future cash flows applied in establishing value in use are based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and represent management's best estimates of the range of economic conditions that will exist over the remaining useful life of the assets, as set down in Statoil's most recently approved long-term forecasts. Statoil uses an approach of regular updatesUpdates of assumptions and economic conditions in establishing the long-term forecasts which are reviewed by corporate management on regular basis and updated at least annually. For assets and CGUs with an expected useful life or timeline for production of expected reserves extending beyond 5 years, the forecasts reflect expected production volumes for oil and natural gas, and the related cash flows include project or asset specific estimates reflecting the relevant period. Such estimates are established based on the basis of Statoil's principles and assumptions and are consistently applied.

 

In performing a value-in-use-based impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are adjusted for risks specific to the asset and discounted using a real post-tax discount rate which is based on Statoil's post-tax weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The use of post-tax discount rates in determining value in use does not result in a materially different determination of the need for, or the amount of, impairment that would be required if pre-tax discount rates had been used.

 

Unproved oil and gas properties are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of the asset or CGU to which the unproved properties belong may exceed its recoverable amount, and at least once a year. Exploratory wells that have found reserves, but where classification of those

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015169


reserves as proved depends on whether major capital expenditure can be justified or where the economic viability of that major capital expenditure depends on the successful completion of further exploration work, will remain capitalised during the evaluation phase for the exploratory finds. Thereafter it will be considered a trigger for impairment evaluation of the well if no development decision is planned for the near future and there are no concretefirm plans for future drilling in the licence.

 

An assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer be relevant or may have decreased. If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years.

 

Impairment losses and reversals of impairment losses are presented in the Consolidated statement of income as Exploration expenses or Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses, on the basis of their nature as either exploration assets (intangible exploration assets) or development and producing assets (property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets), respectively.

 

Impairment of goodwill

Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. Impairment is determined by assessing the recoverable amount of the CGU, or group of units, to which the goodwill relates. Where the recoverable amount of the CGU, or group of units, is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognised. Once recognised, impairments of goodwill are not reversed in future periods.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are initially recognised at fair value when Statoil becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the liability. The subsequent measurement of financial liabilities depends on which category they have been classified into. The categories applicable for Statoil are either financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss or financial liabilities measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The latter applies to Statoil's non-current bank loans and bonds.

 

Financial liabilities are presented as current if the liability is due to be settled within 12 months after the balance sheet date, or if they are held for the purpose of being traded. Financial liabilities are derecognisedde-recognised when the contractual obligations expire, are discharged or cancelled. Gains and losses arising on the repurchase, settlement or cancellation of liabilities are recognised either in interest income and other financial items or in interest and other finance expenses within Netnet financial items.

 

Derivative financial instruments

Statoil uses derivative financial instruments to manage certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently re-measured at fair value through profit and loss. The impact of commodity-based derivative financial instruments is recognised in the Consolidated statement of income under Revenues,revenues, as such derivative instruments are related to sales contracts or revenue-related risk management for all significant purposes. The impact of other financial instruments is reflected under Netnet financial items.

 

Derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities when the fair value is negative. Derivative assets or liabilities expected to be recovered, or with the legal right to be settled more than 12 months after the balance sheet date are classified as non-current, with the exception of derivative financial instruments held for the purpose of being traded.

 

Contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item that can be settled net in cash or another financial instrument, or by exchanging financial instruments, as if the contracts were financial instruments, are accounted for as financial instruments. However, contracts that are entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of the receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with Statoil's expected purchase, sale or usage requirements, also referred to as own-use, are not accounted for as financial instruments. This is applicable to a significant number of contracts for the purchase or sale of crude oil and natural gas, which are recognised upon delivery.


 

Derivatives embedded in other financial instruments or in non-financial host contracts are recognised as separate derivatives and are reflected at fair value with subsequent changes through profit and loss, when their risks and economic characteristics are not closely related to those of the host contracts, and the host contracts are not carried at fair value. Where there is an active market for a commodity or other non-financial item referenced in a purchase or sale contract, a pricing formula will, for instance, be considered to be closely related to the host purchase or sales contract if the price formula is based on the active market in question. A price formula with indexation to other markets or products will however result in the recognition of a separate derivative. Where there is no active market for the commodity or other non-financial item in question, Statoil assesses the characteristics of such a price related embedded derivative to be closely related to the host contract if the price formula is based on relevant indexations commonly used by other market participants. This applies to a number of Statoil'scertain long-term natural gas sales agreements.

 

Pension liabilities

Statoil has pension plans for employees that either provide a defined pension benefit upon retirement or a pension dependent on defined contributions and related returns. A portion of the contributions are provided for as notional contributions, for which the liability increases with a promised notional return, set equal to the actual return of assets invested through the ordinary defined contribution plan. For defined benefit

170Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


plans, the benefit to be received by employees generally depends on many factors including length of service, retirement date and future salary levels.

 

Statoil's proportionate share of multi-employer defined benefit plans are recognised as liabilities in the balance sheet to the extent that sufficient information is available and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made.

 

Statoil's net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their services in the current and prior periods. That benefit is discounted to determine its present value, and the fair value of any plan assets is deducted. The discount rate is the yield at the balance sheet date, reflecting the maturity dates approximating the terms of Statoil's obligations. The discount rate for the main part of the pension obligations has been established on the basis of Norwegian mortgage covered bonds, which are considered high quality corporate bonds. The cost of pension benefit plans is expensed over the period that the employees render services and become eligible to receive benefits. The calculation is performed by an external actuary.

 

The net interest related to defined benefit plans is calculated by applying the discount rate to the opening present value of the benefit obligation and opening present value of the plan assets, adjusted for material changes during the year. The resulting net interest element is presented in the statement of income as part of net pension cost within Net operating income.financial items. The difference between estimated interest income and actual return is recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Past service cost is recognised when a plan amendment (the introduction or withdrawal of, or changes to, a defined benefit plan) or curtailment (a significant reduction by the entity in the number of employees covered by a plan) occurs, or when recognising related restructuring costs or termination benefits. The obligation and related plan assets are re-measured using current actuarial assumptions, and the gain or loss is recognised in the statement of income.

 

Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in full in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they occur, while actuarial gains and losses related to provision for termination benefits are recognised in the Consolidated statement of income in the period in which they occur. Due to the parent company Statoil ASA's functional currency being USD, the significant part of Statoil's pension obligations will be payable in a foreign currency (i.e. NOK). As a consequence, actuarial gains and losses related to the parent company's pension obligation include the impact of exchange rate fluctuations.

 

Contributions to defined contribution schemes are recognised in the statement of income in the period in which the contribution amounts are earned by the employees.

 

Notional contribution plans, reported in the parent company Statoil ASA, are recognised as pension liabilities with the actual value of the notional contributions and promised return at reporting date. Notional contributions and changes in fair value of notional assets are recognised in the statement of income as periodic pension cost.cost, while changes in fair value of notional assets are reflected in the statement of income under Net financial items.

 

Periodic pension cost is accumulated in cost pools and allocated to operating segmentsbusiness areas and Statoil operated joint operations (licences) on an hourshours’ incurred basis and recognised in the statement of income based on the function of the cost.

 

Onerous contracts

Statoil recognises as provisions the net obligation under contracts defined as onerous. Contracts are deemed to be onerous if the unavoidable cost of meeting the obligations under the contract exceeds the economic benefits expected to be received in relation to the contract. A contract which forms an integral part of the operations of a CGU whose assets are dedicated to that contract, and for which the economic benefits cannot be reliably separated from those of the CGU, is included in impairment considerations for the applicable CGU.

 

Asset retirement obligations (ARO)

Provisions for ARO costs are recognised when Statoil has an obligation (legal or constructive) to dismantle and remove a facility or an item of property, plant and equipment and to restore the site on which it is located, and when a reliable estimate of that liability can be made. The amount recognised is the present value of the estimated future expenditures determined in accordance with local conditions and requirements. Cost is estimated based on current regulations and technology, considering relevant risks and uncertainties. The discount rate used in the calculation of the ARO is a risk-free rate based on

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017157


the applicable currency and time horizon of the underlying cash flows, adjusted for a credit premium which reflects Statoil's own credit risk. Normally an obligation arises for a new facility, such as an oil and natural gas production or transportation facility, upon construction or installation. An obligation may also crystallisearise during the period of operation of a facility through a change in legislation or through a decision to terminate operations, or be based on commitments associated with Statoil's ongoing use of pipeline transport systems where removal obligations rest with the volume shippers. The provisions are classified under Provisions provisionsin the Consolidated balance sheet. Some of the refining and process operations are deemed to have indefinite lives, and in consequence, no ARO has been recognised for their plants.

 

When a provision for ARO cost is recognised, a corresponding amount is recognised to increase the related property, plant and equipment and is subsequently depreciated as part of the costs of the facility or item of property, plant and equipment. Any change in the present value of the estimated expenditure is reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the corresponding property, plant and equipment. When a decrease in the ARO provision related to a producing asset exceeds the carrying amount of the asset, the excess is recognised as a reduction of Depreciation,depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses in the Consolidated statement of income. When an asset has reached the end of its useful life, all subsequent changes to the ARO provision are recognised as they occur in Operatingoperating expenses in the Consolidated statement of

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015171


income. Removal provisions associated with Statoil's role as shipper of volumes through third party transport systems are expensed as incurred.

 

Measurement of fair values

Quoted prices in active markets represent the best evidence of fair value and are used by Statoil in determining the fair values of assets and liabilities to the extent possible. Financial instruments quoted in active markets will typically include commercial papers, bonds and equity instruments with quoted market prices obtained from the relevant exchanges or clearing houses. The fair values of quoted financial assets, financial liabilities and derivative instruments are determined by reference to mid-market prices, at the close of business on the balance sheet date.

 

Where there is no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. These include using recent arm's-length market transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, and pricing models and related internal assumptions. In the valuation techniques, Statoil also takes into consideration the counterparty and its own credit risk. This is either reflected in the discount rate used or through direct adjustments to the calculated cash flows. Consequently, where Statoil reflects elements of long-term physical delivery commodity contracts at fair value, such fair value estimates to the extent possible are based on quoted forward prices in the market and underlying indexes in the contracts, as well as assumptions of forward prices and margins where observable market prices are not available. Similarly, the fair values of interest and currency swaps are estimated based on relevant quotes from active markets, quotes of comparable instruments, and other appropriate valuation techniques.

 

Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

Critical judgements in applying accounting policies

The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimations (see below), that Statoil has made in the process of applying the accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements:

 

Revenue recognition - gross versus net presentation of traded SDFI volumes of oil and gas production

As described under Transactions with the Norwegian State above, Statoil markets and sells the Norwegian State's share of oil and gas production from the NCS. Statoil includes the costs of purchase and proceeds from the sale of the SDFI oil production in Purchasespurchases [net of inventory variation] and Revenues, revenues,respectively. In making the judgement, Statoil considered the detailed criteria for the recognition of revenue from the sale of goods and, in particular, concluded that the risk and reward of the ownership of the oil had been transferred from the SDFI to Statoil.

 

Statoil sells, in its own name, but for the Norwegian State's account and risk, the State's production of natural gas. These gas sales, and related expenditures refunded by the State, are shown net in Statoil's Consolidated financial statements. In making the judgement, Statoil considered the same

criteria as for the oil production and concluded that the risk and reward of the ownership of the gas had not been transferred from the SDFI to Statoil.

 

Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of the Consolidated financial statements requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis considering the current and expected future market conditions.

 

Statoil is exposed to a number of underlying economic factors which affect the overall results, such as liquids prices, natural gas prices, refining margins, foreign exchange rates and interest rates as well as financial instruments with fair values derived from changes in these factors. In addition, Statoil's results are influenced by the level of production, which in the short term may be influenced by, for instance, maintenance programmes. In the long term, the results are impacted by the success of exploration and field development activities.

 

The matters described below are considered to be the most important in understanding the key sources of estimation uncertainty that are involved in preparing these Consolidated financial statements and the uncertainties that could most significantly impact the amounts reported on the results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

 

Proved oil and gas reserves

Proved oil and gas reserves may materially impact the Consolidated financial statements, as changes in the proved reserves, for instance as a result of changes in prices, will impact the unit of production rates used for depreciation and amortisation. Proved oil and gas reserves have been estimated by internal qualified professionals on the basisare those quantities of industry standards and governed by criteria established by regulations of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), which require the use of a price based on a 12-month average for reserve estimation, and which are to be based on existing economic conditions and operating methods and with a high degree of confidence (at least 90% probability) that the quantities will be recovered. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) requirements for supplemental oil and gas disclosures align with the SEC regulations. Reserves estimates are based on subjective judgements involving geological and engineering assessments of in-place hydrocarbon volumes, the production, historical recovery and processing yield factors and installed plant operating capacity. For future development projects, proved reserves estimates are included only where there is a significant commitment to project funding and execution and when relevant governmental and regulatory approvals have been secured or are reasonably certain to be secured. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and quantity of the technical and economic data and the efficiency of extracting and processing the hydrocarbons. An independent third party has evaluated Statoil's proved reserves estimates, and the results

1721582   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


of this evaluation do not differ materially from Statoil's estimates. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations. Unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, estimates of economically producible reserves only reflect the period before the contracts providing the right to operate expire. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced, or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence within a reasonable time.

 

Proved oil and gas reserves have been estimated by internal qualified professionals on the basis of industry standards and are governed by the oil and gas rules and disclosure requirements in the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations S-K and S-X, and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) requirements for supplemental oil and gas disclosures. The estimates have been based on a 12-month average product price and on existing economic conditions and operating methods as required, and recovery of the estimated quantities have a high degree of certainty (at least a 90% probability).

Reserves estimates are based on subjective judgements involving geological and engineering assessments of in-place hydrocarbon volumes, the production, historical recovery and processing yield factors and installed plant operating capacity. For future development projects, proved reserves estimates are included only where there is a significant commitment to project funding and execution and when relevant governmental and regulatory approvals have been secured or are reasonably certain to be secured. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and availability of the technical and economic data and the efficiency of extracting and processing the hydrocarbons. An independent third party has evaluated Statoil's proved reserves estimates, and the results of this evaluation do not differ materially from Statoil's estimates.

Expected oil and gas reserves

Expected oil and gas reserves may materially impact the Consolidated financial statements, as changes in the expected reserves, for instance as a result of changes in prices, will impact asset retirement obligations and impairment testing of upstream assets, which in turn may lead to changes in impairment charges affecting operating income. Expected oil and gas reserves are the estimated remaining, commercially recoverable quantities, based on Statoil's judgement of future economic conditions, from projects in operation or justified for development. Recoverable oil and gas quantities are always uncertain, and the expected value is the weighted average, or statistical mean, of the possible outcomes. Expected reserves are therefore typically larger than proved reserves as defined by the SEC rules. Expected oil and gas reserves have been estimated by internal qualified professionals on the basis of industry standards and are used for impairment testing purposes and for calculation of asset retirement obligations. Reserves estimates are based on subjective judgements involving geological and engineering assessments of in-place hydrocarbon volumes, the production, historical recovery and processing yield factors, installed plant operating capacity and operating approval limits. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and quantity of the technical and economic data and the efficiency of extracting and processing the hydrocarbons.Such estimates are inherently less reliable in early field life or where the available data is limited following a recently implemented change in the method of production.

Exploration and leasehold acquisition costs

Statoil capitalises the costs of drilling exploratory wells pending determination of whether the wells have found proved oil and gas reserves. Statoil also capitalises leasehold acquisition costs and signature bonuses paid to obtain access to undeveloped oil and gas acreage. Judgements as to whether these expenditures should remain capitalised, be de-recognised or written down due to impairment losses in the period may materially affect the operating income for the period.

 

Impairment/reversal of impairment

Statoil has significant investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Changes in the circumstances or expectations of future performance of an individual asset may be an indicator that the asset is impaired, requiring the carrying amount to be written down to its recoverable amount. Impairments are reversed if conditions for impairment are no longer present. Evaluating whether an asset is impaired or if an impairment should be reversed requires a high degree of judgement and may to a large extent depend upon the selection of key assumptions about the future.

 

The key assumptions used will bear the risk of change based on the inherent volatile nature of macro-economic factors such as future commodity prices or discount rate and uncertainty in asset specific factors such as reserve estimates and operational decisions impacting the production profile or activity levels for our oil and natural gas properties. When estimating the recoverable amount, the single most likely future cash flows, the point estimate, is the primary method applied to reflect uncertainties in timing and amount inherent in the assumptions used in the estimated future cash flows. For assumptions in which the expected probability distributions or outcome are expected to be significantly skewed the use of decision trees or simulation is applied.

Unproved oil and gas properties are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of the relevant asset or CGU may exceed its recoverable amount, and at least annually. If, following evaluation, an exploratory well has not found proved reserves, the previously capitalised costs are tested for impairment. Subsequent to the initial evaluation phase for a well, it will be considered a trigger for impairment testing of a well if no development decision is planned for the near future and there is no concretefirm plan for future drilling in the licence.

Impairment of unsuccessful wells is reversed, as applicable, to the extent that conditions for impairment are no longer present.

 

EstimatingWhere recoverable amounts involves complexity in estimating relevantare based on estimated future cash flows, based onreflecting Statoil’s or market participants’ assumptions about the future and discounted to their present value.value, the estimates involve complexity. Impairment testing requires long-term assumptions to be made concerning a number of often volatile economic factors such as future market prices, refinery margins, currency exchange rates and future output, discount rates and political and country risk among others, in order to establish relevant future cash flows. Impairment testing frequently also requires judgement regarding probabilities and probability distributions as well as levels of sensitivity inherent in the establishment of recoverable amount estimates. Long-term assumptions for major economic factors are made at a group level, and there is a high degree of reasoned judgement involved in establishing these assumptions, in determining other relevant factors such as forward price curves, in estimating production outputs and in determining the ultimate terminal value of an asset.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017159


Employee retirement plans

When estimating the present value of defined benefit pension obligations that represent a long-term liability in the Consolidated balance sheet, and indirectly, the period's net pension expense in the Consolidated statement of income, management make a number of critical assumptions affecting these estimates. Most notably, assumptions made about the discount rate to be applied to future benefit payments and plan assets, the expected rate of pension increase and the annual rate of compensation increase, have a direct and potentially material impact on the amounts presented. Significant changes in these assumptions between periods can have a material effect on the Consolidated financial statements.

 

Asset retirement obligations

Statoil has significant obligations to decommission and remove offshore installations at the end of the production period. It is difficult to estimate theThe costs of these decommissioning and removal activities which are based onrequire revisions due to changes in current regulations and technology and considerwhile considering relevant risks and uncertainties. Most of the removal activities are many years into the future, and the removal technology and costs are constantly changing. The estimates include assumptions of the time required and the day rates for rigs, marine operations and heavy lift vessels that can vary considerably depending on the assumed removal complexity. As a result, the initial recognition of the liability and the capitalised cost associated with decommissioning and removal obligations, and the subsequent adjustment of these balance sheet items, involve the application of significant judgement.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015173


 

Derivative financial instruments

When not directly observable in active markets, the fair value of derivative contracts must be computed internally based on internal assumptions as well as directly observable market information, including forward and yield curves for commodities, currencies and interest rates. Changes in internal assumptions, forward and yield curves could materially impact the internally computed fair value of derivative contracts, particularly long-term contracts, resulting in a corresponding impact on income or loss in the Consolidated statement of income.

 

Income tax

Every year Statoil incurs significant amounts of income taxes payable to various jurisdictions around the world and recognises significant changes to deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, all of which are based on management's interpretations of applicable laws, regulations and relevant court decisions. The quality of these estimates is highly dependent upon management's ability to properly applyproper application of at times very complex sets of rules, to recognisethe recognition of changes in applicable rules and, in the case of deferred tax assets, management's ability to project future earnings from activities that may apply loss carry forward positions against future income taxes.

 

3 Segments

 

With effect from the third quarter of 2015 Statoil implemented a new corporate structure. Statoil'sStatoil’s operations are now managed through the following operating segments:business areas: Development and& Production Norway (DPN), Development and& Production USA (DPUSA), Development and& Production International (DPI), Marketing, Midstream and& Processing (MMP), New Energy Solutions (NES), Technology, Projects & Drilling (TPD), Exploration (EXP) and Other.Global Strategy & Business Development (GSB).

 

The development and production operating segmentsbusiness areas are responsible for the commercial development of the oil and gas portfolios within their respective geographical areas: DPN on the Norwegian continental shelf, DPUSA including offshore and onshore activities in the USA and Mexico, and DPI worldwide outside of DPN and DPUSA.

 

Exploration activities are managed by a separate business unit,area, which has the global responsibility across the group for discovery and appraisal of new resources. Exploration activities are allocated to and presented in the respective development and production operating segments.business areas.

 

The MMP segmentbusiness area is responsible for marketing and trading of oil and gas commodities (crude, condensate, gas liquids, products, natural gas and liquefied natural gas), electricity and emission rights, as well as transportation, processing and manufacturing of the above mentionedabove-mentioned commodities, operations of refineries, terminals, processing and power plants.

 

The NES segmentbusiness area is responsible for wind parks, carbon capture and storage as well as other renewable energy and low-carbon energy solutions.

 

Statoil reports itsThe business through reporting segments which correspond to the operating segments, except for the operating segmentsareas DPI and DPUSA which have beenare aggregated into onethe reporting segment Exploration & Production International (E&P International), previously named Development and Production International. ThisThe aggregation has its basis in similar economic characteristics, such as the assets’ long term and capital-intensive nature and exposure to volatile oil and gas commodity prices, the nature of products, servicesservice and production processes, the type and class of customers, the methods of distribution and regulatory environment. The new operatingreporting segments Exploration & Production Norway (E&P Norway), previously named Development and Production Norway, and MMP consists of the business areas DPN and MMP respectively. The business areas NES, GSB, TPD, EXP and corporate staffs and support functions are aggregated into the reporting segment NES is reported in the segment Other in 2015“Other” due to its immateriality.

the immateriality of these areas. The Othermajority of costs within the business areas GSB, TPD and EXP are allocated to the E&P International, E&P Norway and MMP reporting segment includes activities within New Energy Solutions, Global Strategy and Business Development, Technology, Projects and Drilling and Corporate Staffs and Services.segments.

 

The eliminations section includes the elimination of inter-segment sales and related unrealised profits, mainly from the sale of crude oil and products. Inter-segment revenues are based upon estimated market prices.

 

Segment data for the years ended 31 December 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 isare presented below. The measurement basis of segment profit is Net operating incomeincome/(loss). In the tables below, deferred tax assets, pension assets and non-current financial assets are not allocated to the segments. Also, the line additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments isare excluding movements due to changes in asset retirement obligations.

 

(in NOK billion)

Development and Production Norway

Development and Production International

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

Other

Eliminations

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues third party and other income

(0.9)

15.3

465.5

3.1

 -    

483.1

Revenues inter-segment

140.4

53.9

1.5

0.0

(195.7)

(0.0)

Net income (loss) from equity accounted investments

0.0

(0.8)

0.4

0.0

 -    

(0.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

139.5

68.4

467.4

3.2

(195.7)

482.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

(0.0)

(0.1)

(406.5)

(0.0)

195.4

(211.2)

Operating and SG&A expenses

(25.8)

(27.3)

(37.6)

(2.8)

1.5

(91.9)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(51.4)

(81.6)

0.4

(1.1)

0.0

(133.8)

Exploration expenses

(4.6)

(26.3)

0.0

0.0

0.0

(31.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

57.6

(66.9)

23.7

(0.8)

1.2

14.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments

 50.6  

 65.4  

 7.3  

 2.2  

 0.0  

125.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet information

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

0.0

2.9

1.9

2.4

 -    

7.3

Non-current segment assets

244.1

330.1

49.2

6.1

 -    

629.5

Non-current assets, not allocated to segments 

 

 

 

 

 

82.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

718.7

1741602   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 



  

(in NOK billion)

Development and Production Norway

Development and Production International

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

Other

Eliminations

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues third party and other income

9.0

18.6

595.0

0.4

 -    

622.9

Revenues inter-segment

173.2

67.3

1.8

0.0

(242.3)

(0.0)

Net income (loss) from equity accounted investments

0.1

(0.8)

0.5

(0.0)

 -    

(0.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

182.2

85.2

597.3

0.3

(242.3)

622.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

(0.0)

(0.0)

(544.2)

(0.0)

242.9

(301.3)

Operating and SG&A expenses

(25.2)

(22.9)

(33.2)

(0.9)

2.0

(80.2)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(40.0)

(56.8)

(3.6)

(1.0)

 -    

(101.4)

Exploration expenses

(5.4)

(25.0)

(0.0)

0.0

 -    

(30.3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

111.7

(19.5)

16.2

(1.5)

2.6

109.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments

 55.1  

 61.4  

 7.8  

 0.8  

 -    

 125.1  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet information

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

0.2

4.8

3.2

0.2

 -    

8.4

Non-current segment assets

262.0

333.8

46.3

5.1

 -    

647.3

Non-current assets, not allocated to segments 

 

 

 

 

 

76.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

731.7

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    175161


 

(in NOK billion)

Development and Production Norway

Development and Production International

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

Other

Eliminations

Total

(in USD million)

E&P Norway

E&P International

MMP

Other

Eliminations

Total

 

 

Full year 2013

 

Full year 2017

 

Revenues third party and other income

9.4

16.5

607.5

1.0

 -    

634.4

(23)

1,984

58,935

102

0

60,999

Revenues inter-segment

192.7

65.4

1.0

0.1

(259.1)

0.0

Net income (loss) from equity accounted investments

0.1

(0.0)

0.1

(0.0)

 -    

0.1

Revenues inter-segment 1)

17,586

7,249

83

1

(24,919)

0

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

129

22

53

(16)

0

188

 

 

Total revenues and other income

202.2

81.9

608.6

1.0

(259.1)

634.5

17,692

9,256

59,071

87

(24,919)

61,187

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

0.0

(0.1)

(565.2)

(0.0)

258.4

(306.9)

Operating and SG&A expenses

(27.4)

(21.0)

(33.7)

(0.8)

1.1

(81.9)

Purchases [net of inventory variation] 1)

0

(7)

(52,647)

(0)

24,442

(28,212)

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses 1)

(2,954)

(2,804)

(3,925)

(235)

418

(9,501)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(32.2)

(31.9)

(7.0)

(1.3)

0.0

(72.4)

(3,874)

(4,423)

(256)

(91)

(0)

(8,644)

Exploration expenses

(5.5)

(12.5)

(0.0)

0.0

(18.0)

(379)

(681)

0

(1,059)

 

 

Net operating income

137.1

16.4

2.6

(1.1)

0.4

155.5

Net operating income/(loss)

10,485

1,341

2,243

(239)

(59)

13,771

 

 

Additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments

 57.3  

 52.9  

 5.9  

 1.3  

 -    

 117.4  

4,869

5,063

320

543

0

10,795

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet information

 

 

Equity accounted investments

0.2

4.8

2.3

0.2

 -    

7.4

1,133

234

134

1,050

0

2,551

Non-current segment assets

247.6

286.5

39.3

5.6

 -    

578.9

30,278

36,453

5,137

390

0

72,258

Non-current assets, not allocated to segments

 

60.5

 

9,102

 

 

Total non-current assets

 

646.8

 

83,911

 

1) Parts of the gas transportation costs that previously were allocated to MMP and therefore deducted from the inter segment transfer price, are from 1 January 2017 allocated to E&P Norway.

1) Parts of the gas transportation costs that previously were allocated to MMP and therefore deducted from the inter segment transfer price, are from 1 January 2017 allocated to E&P Norway.

 

 

 

1622Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


(in USD million)

E&P Norway

E&P International

MMP

Other

Eliminations

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues third party and other income

184

884

44,883

41

0

45,993

Revenues inter-segment

12,971

5,873

35

1

(18,880)

(0)

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

(78)

(100)

61

(3)

0

(119)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

13,077

6,657

44,979

39

(18,880)

45,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

1

(7)

(39,696)

(0)

18,198

(21,505)

Operating, selling, general and administative expenses

(2,547)

(2,923)

(4,439)

(340)

463

(9,787)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(5,698)

(5,510)

(221)

(121)

0

(11,550)

Exploration expenses

(383)

(2,569)

0

0

0

(2,952)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income/(loss)

4,451

(4,352)

623

(423)

(219)

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments

6,786

6,397

492

451

0

14,125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet information

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

1,133

365

129

617

0

2,245

Non-current segment assets

27,816

36,181

4,450

352

0

68,799

Non-current assets, not allocated to segments 

 

 

 

 

 

8,090

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

79,133

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017163


(in USD million)

E&P Norway

E&P International

MMP

Other

Eliminations

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues third party and other income

(123)

1,576

57,868

349

0

59,671

Revenues inter-segment

17,459

6,715

183

1

(24,357)

(0)

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

3

(91)

55

4

0

(29)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

17,339

8,200

58,106

354

(24,357)

59,642

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

(0)

(10)

(50,547)

(0)

24,303

(26,254)

Operating, selling, general and administative expenses

(3,223)

(3,391)

(4,664)

(342)

187

(11,433)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(6,379)

(10,231)

37

(142)

(0)

(16,715)

Exploration expenses

(576)

(3,296)

(0)

0

0

(3,872)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income /(loss)

7,161

(8,729)

2,931

(129)

133

1,366

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments

6,293

8,119

900

273

0

15,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet information

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

5

333

214

272

0

824

Non-current segment assets

27,706

37,475

5,588

690

0

71,458

Non-current assets, not allocated to segments 

 

 

 

 

 

9,305

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

81,588

 

See note 4 Acquisitions and dispositionsdivestmentsfor information on transactions that affect the different segments.

 

See note 1110 Property, plant and equipment for further information on impairment losses that affected the different segments.

See note 11 Intangible assets for information on impairment losses that affected the different segments.

 

See note 12 Intangible assets for information on impairment losses that affected primarily the DPI segment.

See note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assetsfor information on contingencies that have influenced the DPI and MMP segments.

 

Revenues by geographical areas

Statoil has business operations in more than 30 countries. When attributing revenues third party and other income to the country of the legal entity executing the sale, Norway constitutes 76%74% and the USA constitutes 13%17%.

1761642   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Non-current assets by country

 

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Norway

277.4

289.6

269.6

34,588

31,484

31,487

USA

180.9

182.9

159.2

19,267

18,223

20,531

Angola

47.1

51.3

45.9

Brazil

30.6

29.5

24.5

4,584

5,308

3,474

UK

25.4

19.7

13.6

4,222

3,108

2,882

Angola

2,888

3,884

5,350

Canada

20.0

17.6

19.9

1,715

1,494

2,270

Azerbaijan

1,472

1,326

1,416

Algeria

12.6

11.8

9.0

1,114

1,344

1,435

Azerbaijan

12.5

23.6

19.0

Other countries

30.3

29.5

25.6

4,958

4,873

3,436

 

 

Total non-current assets1)

636.7

655.6

586.3

74,809

71,043

72,282

 

1)        Excluding deferred tax assets, pension assets and non-current financial assets.



 

Revenues by product type

Revenues by product type

Revenues by product type

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil

223.1

324.6

321.5

29,519

24,307

27,806

Natural gas

99.6

99.3

110.4

11,420

9,202

12,390

Refined products

86.5

104.8

118.9

11,423

8,142

10,761

Natural gas liquids

44.2

59.5

64.5

5,647

4,036

5,482

Other

12.0

18.6

1.3

2,963

1

1,461

 

 

Total revenues

465.3

606.8

616.6

60,971

45,688

57,900

 

4 Acquisitions and disposalsdivestments

 

20152017

Sale of interestsinterest in the Marcellus onshore playKai Kos Dehseh

In January 2015 2017 Statoil closed an agreement, entered in December 2016, with Southwestern Energy, entered intoAthabasca Oil Corporation to divest its 100% interest in Kai Kos Dehseh (KKD) oil sands. The total consideration consisted of cash consideration of CAD 431 million (USD 328 million), 100 million common shares in Athabasca Oil Corporation (which is accounted for as an available for sale financial investment) and a series of contingent payments. The shares and the contingent consideration were measured at a combined fair value of CAD 185 million (USD 142 million) on the closing date. A loss on the transaction of USD 351 million has been recognised as operating expense and includes a reclassification of accumulated foreign exchange losses, previously recognised in other comprehensive income/(loss). The transaction is reflected in the fourth quarter 2014,Exploration & Production International (E&P International) segment.

Acquisition and divestment of operated interest in Brazil

reducing Statoil’s average workingIn November 2016 Statoil acquired a 66% operated interest in the non-operated southern Marcellus onshore playBrazilian offshore licence BM-S-8 in the Santos basin from 29%Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”). A cash consideration of USD 1,250 million was paid on the closing date and USD 300 million is expected to 23%be paid late March 2018. The payment of the remaining consideration of USD 950 million is subject to certain conditions being met, and is reflected at fair value at the reporting date. The value of the acquired exploration assets resulted in an increase in intangible assets of USD 2,271 million at the transaction date.

In August 2017 Statoil entered into an agreement with Queiroz Galvão Exploração e Produção (“QGEP”) to acquire QGEP’s 10% interest in the same licence in Brazil’s Santos basin increasing the operated interest to 76%. A cash consideration of USD 194 million was paid on the closing date, presented as a capital expenditure in the Statement of cash flows. The remaining consideration consists of two cash payments. The payment of USD 45 million is expected to be paid late March 2018.  The payment of USD 144 million is subject to certain conditions being met, and is reflected at fair value at the reporting date. The value of the acquired exploration assets resulted in an increase in intangible assets of USD 362 million at the transaction date. The agreement was closed in December 2017.

In October 2017, the consortium comprising Statoil (operator, 40%), ExxonMobil (40%) and Galp (20%) presented the winning bid (67.12% of profit oil) for the Carcará North block in the Santos basin. Statoil’s share of the pre-determined signature bonus paid by the consortium in December 2017 was USD 350 million and is recognised as an intangible asset. 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017165


At the same time in October 2017 Statoil has agreed to divest 33% out of its 76% interest in BM-S-8 licence to ExxonMobil for a total potential consideration of around USD 1.3 billion, comprising an upfront cash payment of around USD 800 million and a contingent cash payment of around USD 500 million; a further 3.5% to ExxonMobil and 3% to Galp for a total consideration of around USD 250 million, comprising an upfront cash payment of around USD 155 million and a contingent cash payment of around USD 95 million. As of 31 December 2017, intangible assets related to and liabilities associated with the 39.5% of current interest in BM-S-8 were presented as held for sale in the Consolidated balance sheet. No impact on the Consolidated statement of income is expected upon the closing of the divestment.

After closing these transactions, Statoil will have an ownership share of 36.5% in the licences, which are expected to be unitised.The transactions are accounted for in the E&P International segment.

Extension of the Azeri-Chirag-Deepwater Gunashli (ACG) production sharing agreement

In the third quarter of 2017 the Azeri-Chirag-Deepwater Gunashli (ACG) production sharing agreement was extended by 25 years and will be effective until the end of 2049. The transaction was recognised in the Development and ProductionE&P International (segment in the fourth quarter of 2017, following ratification by the Parliament (Milli Majlis) of the Republic of Azerbaijan. As part of the new agreement, Statoil’s participating interest will be adjusted to 7.27% down from 8.56%. The international partners will make a total payment of USD 3.6 billion to the State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Statoil's share will be approximately USD 349 million, which will be paid over a period of 8 years.

Acquisition of interests in Roncador field

DPIIn December 2017 Statoil entered into agreement with Petrobras to acquire a 25% interest in Roncador, an oil field in the Campos Basin in Brazil.) segment with no impactA cash consideration of USD 2.35 billion will be paid on the Consolidated statementclosing date. The liability for payment of income. Proceedsthe remaining consideration of up to USD 550 million is subject to certain conditions being met, and will be reflected at fair value at the acquisition date. Petrobras retains operatorship and a 75% interest. Closing is expected in 2018 and is subject to certain conditions, including government approval. The acquired interest will be reflected in accordance with the principles of IFRS 3 Business Combinations, and Statoil’s ownership in the field will thereafter be accounted for as a joint operation. The transaction will be accounted for in the E&P International segment.

Acquisition of interests in Martin Linge field and Garantiana discovery

In December 2017 Statoil and Total have agreed on a transaction whereby Statoil will acquire Total’s equity stakes and take over as operator in the Martin Linge field (51%) and the Garantiana discovery (40%) on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). The transaction is subject to certain conditions, including government approval. Statoil will pay Total consideration which, based on a 1 January 2017 valuation, amounts to USD 1.45 billion. At the completion of the transaction, which is expected late March 2018, the consideration will be subject to adjustment reflecting post-tax cash flows in the period from valuation until the sale were NOK 2.8 billiondate of closing. The assets and liabilities related to the acquired portion of Martin Linge will be reflected in accordance with the principles of IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The transaction will be accounted for in the Exploration & Production Norway (E&P Norway) segment..

Sale2016

Acquisition of shares in Lundin Petroleum AB (Lundin) and sale of interests in the Shah Deniz projectEdvard Grieg field

In January 2016 Statoil acquired 11.93% of the issued share capital and the South Caucasus Pipeline

votes in Lundin Petroleum AB for a total purchase price of SEK 4.6 billion (USD 541 million).  In April 2015June 2016 Statoil closed an agreement with Petronas, entered into in October 2014,Lundin to selldivest its remaining 15.5%entire 15% interest in the Shah Deniz projectEdvard Grieg field, a 9% interest in the Edvard Grieg Oil pipeline and a 6% interest in the South Caucasus Pipeline.Utsira High Gas pipeline for an increased ownership share in Lundin. In addition to the divested interests, a cash consideration of SEK 544 million (USD 64 million) was paid to Lundin. Following the completion of the transaction Statoil owned 68.4 million shares of Lundin, corresponding to 20.1% of the outstanding shares and votes. Statoil recognised a total net gain of NOK 12.4 billion. The gain wasUSD 120 million related to the divestment presented in the line item Otherother income in the Consolidated statement of income. In the segment reporting, the gain was recognised in the DPIE&P Norway segment (USD 114 million) and in the Marketing, Midstream and& Processing (MMP) segments, with NOK 12.3 billion and NOK 0.1 billion, respectively. segment (USD 5 million). The part of the transaction recognised in the DPI segment was tax exempt under the rulesNorwegian petroleum tax legislation.

Following the increase in ownership interest on 30 June 2016, Statoil obtained significant influence over Lundin, and accounted for the investment as an associate under the equity method. Excess values were allocated mainly to Lundin`s exploration and production licences on the Norwegian continental shelf. The investment in Lundin was included in the Consolidated balance sheet within line item equity accounted investments with a book value of USD 1,199 million as per 30 June 2016. The Lundin investment is reported as part of the E&P Norway segment. For summarised financial information relating investment in Lundin Petroleum AB, see note 12 Equity accounted investments.  Following the change in accounting classification, Statoil recognised a gain of USD 127 million representing the cumulative gain on its initial 11.93% shareholding being reclassified from the line item net gains (losses) from available for sale financial assets in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income, to the net financial items line item in the Consolidated statement of income.

Sale of interest in Marcellus operated onshore play

In July 2016 Statoil divested its operated properties in the US state of West Virginia to EQT Corporation for USD 407 million in cash. The transaction was reported as part of E&P International segmentwith an immaterial effect on the Consolidated statement of income recognised in the third quarter of 2016.

2015

Sale of interests in the Marcellus onshore play

In January 2015 Statoil reduced its average working interest in the non-operated southern Marcellus onshore play from 29% to 23% through a divestment to Southwestern Energy. Proceeds from the sale were USD 365 million, recognised in the E&P International segmentwith no gain.

1662Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Sale of interests in the Shah Deniz project and Azerbaijan. the South Caucasus Pipeline

In April 2015 Statoil sold its remaining 15.5% interest in the Shah Deniz project and the South Caucasus Pipeline to Petronas with a total gain of USD 1,182 million, recognised in the E&P International and the MMP segments. Total proceeds from the sale were NOK 20.3 billion,USD 2,688 million.

Sale of which NOK 0.7 billion was received in 2014 and NOK 19.6 billion in 2015.buildings

Sale of head office building

In June 2015 Statoil closedsold the shares in Forusbeen 50 AS, Strandveien 4 AS and Arkitekt Ebbelsvei 10 AS with a transaction with Colony Capital, Inc. forgain of USD 211 million, recognised in the Other segment. Proceeds from the sale of the company’s head office building in Stavanger through the sale of shares in the company Forusbeen 50 AS.were USD 486 million. At the same time Statoil entered into a 15 year operating lease agreement for the building. A gain of NOK 1.5 billion was recognised in the Other segment. The gain was presented in the line item Other income in the Consolidated statement of income. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 2.3 billion.

Sale of office buildings

In December 2015 Statoil closed a transaction with TRD Campus AS for the sale of the company’s office buildings in Trondheim and Stjørdal through the sale of shares in the companies Strandveien 4 AS and Arkitekt Ebbelsvei 10 AS. At the same time Statoil entered into 15 year operating lease agreements for the buildings. A gain of NOK 0.6 billion was recognised in the Other segment. The gain was presented in the line item Other income in the Consolidated statement of income. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 1.7 billion.buildings.

Sale of interests in the Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015177


In December 2015 Statoil closed an agreement with Italian gas structure company Snam SpA to sellsold its 20%20% interest in Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG. AAG to Snam SpA, with a gain of NOK 1.4 billion wasUSD 139 million, recognised in the MMP segment. The gain was tax exempt and presented in the line item Other income in the Consolidated statement of income. Total proceeds from the sale were NOK 2.0 billion.USD 227 million.

 

Sale of interests in the Gudrun field and acquisition of interests in Eagle Ford

In December 2015 Statoil closed an agreement with Repsol to sellsold a 15%15% interest in the Gudrun field on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS).Statoil remains the operator and largest equity holder with a 36% interest.Statoil recognised to Repsol, recognizing a total gain of NOK 1.2 billionUSD 142 million in the Development and Production Norway (DPN)E&P Norway segment. The gain was presented in the line item Other income in the Consolidated statement of income. The transaction was tax exempt under the Norwegian petroleum tax legislation. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 1.9 billion.

USD 216 million. Simultaneously Statoil closedacquired an agreement to acquire an additional 13%additional 13% interest in the Eagle Ford formation with the same party. Statoil’s total interest in the Eagle Ford shale play after the acquisition is 63%, and Statoil also became the sole operator. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method. The acquisition and valuation date for the purchase price allocation was 30 December 2015. The fair value of net identifiable assets was NOK 3.5 billion. The acquisition was recognisedmethod in the DPI E&P Internationaland MMP reporting segments with the fair value of net identifiable assets of NOK 2.4 billionUSD 277 million and NOK 1.1 billion, respectively. The total purchase priceUSD 121 million, respectively as of the business combination was NOK 3.5 billion.30 December 2015. No goodwill was recognised.

2014

Sale of interests in the Shah Deniz project and the South Caucasus Pipeline

In March 2014 Statoil closed an agreement with BP and in May 2014 Statoil closed an agreement with SOCAR, both entered into in December 2013, to divest a 3.33% working interest and a 6.67% working interest, respectively, in the Shah Deniz project and the South Caucasus Pipeline. Statoil recognised a total gain of NOK 5.4 billion, presented in the line item Other income in the Consolidated statement of income. In the segment reporting, the gain has been presented in the DPI segment and the MMP segment with NOK 5.2 billion and NOK 0.2 billion, respectively. The part of the transaction recognised in the DPI segment was tax exempt under the rules in Norway and Azerbaijan. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 8.2 billion.

Kai Kos Dehseh oil sands swap agreement

In May 2014 Statoil and its partner PTTEP closed an agreement to swap the two parties' respective interests in the Kai Kos Dehseh oil sands project in Alberta, Canada. Statoil paid a balancing cash consideration of NOK 2.5 billion and assumed a net liability of NOK 0.3 billion. Subsequent to the closing, Statoil continues as 100% owner of the Leismer and Corner projects, while PTTEP owns 100% of the Thornbury, Hangingstone and South Leismer areas. The transaction has been recognised in the DPI segment resulting in an increase in Property, plant and equipment of NOK 4.6 billion, including a transfer from Intangible assets of NOK 1.8 billion, and with no impact on the Consolidated statement of income.

Sale of interests in licences on the Norwegian continental shelf

In December 2014 Statoil closed an agreement with Wintershall to sell certain ownership interests in licences on the NCS. A gain of NOK 5.9 billion has been recognised in the DPN segment. The gain has been presented in the line item Other income in the Consolidated statement of income. The transaction was tax exempt under the rules in the Norwegian petroleum tax legislation, and the gain included a release of related deferred tax liabilities. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 8.7 billion (USD 1.25 billion).

2013

Sale of interests in exploration and production licences on the Norwegian continental shelf to Wintershall

In July 2013 a sales transaction with Wintershall of certain ownership interests in licences on the NCS was closed. Statoil recognised a gain of NOK 6.4 billion. The gain has been presented in the line item Other incomein the Consolidated statement of income. In the segment reporting, the gain has been presented in the DPN segment in revenues third party and other income. The transaction was tax exempt under the rules in the Norwegian petroleum tax legislation. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 4.7 billion.

Sale of interests in exploration and production licences on the Norwegian continental shelf and the United Kingdom continental shelf to OMV

In October 2013 a sales transaction with OMV to sell certain ownership interests in licences on the NCS and United Kingdom continental shelf was closed. Statoil recognised a gain of NOK 10.1 billion. The gain has been presented in the line item Other incomein the Consolidated statement of income. In the segment reporting, the gain has been presented in the DPN segment and in the DPI segment in revenues third party and other income with NOK 6.6 billion and NOK 3.5 billion, respectively. The part of the transaction covering assets on the NCS was tax exempt under the rules in the Norwegian petroleum tax legislation. Proceeds from the sale were NOK 15.9 billion.

 

5 Financial risk management

 

General information relevant to financial risks

Statoil's business activities naturally expose Statoil to financial risk. Statoil's approach to risk management includes assessing and managing risk

in all activities using a holistic risk approach. Statoil utilisestakes into account correlations between the most important market risks such as oil and natural gas prices, refined oil product prices, currencies, and interest rates, to calculate the overall market risk and thereby take into account the natural hedges inherent in Statoil's portfolio. Adding the different market risks without considering these correlations would overestimate Statoil's total market risk. This approach allows Statoil to reduce the number of risk management transactions and thereby reduce transaction costs and avoid sub-optimisation.

178Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

An important element in risk management is the use of centralised trading mandates. All major strategic transactions are required to be coordinated

through Statoil's corporate risk committee. Mandates delegated toin the trading organisations within crude oil, refined products, natural gas and electricity are

relatively small compared to the total market risk of Statoil. All major strategic transactions are required to be coordinated through Statoil’s corporate risk committee.

 

The corporate risk committee, which is headed by the chief financial officer and includes representatives from the principal business segments, is responsible for defining, developing and reviewing Statoil's risk policies. The chief financial officer, assisted by the committee, is also responsible for overseeing and developing Statoil's Enterprise Risk Management and proposing appropriate measures to adjust risk at the corporate level. The committee meets at least six times per year and regularly reviews risk information relevant to Statoil.

 

Financial risks

Statoil's activities expose Statoil to the following financial risks:

·       Market risk (including commodity price risk, currency risk and interest rate risk)

·       Liquidity risk

·       Credit risk

 

Market risk

Statoil operates in the worldwide crude oil, refined products, natural gas, and electricity markets and is exposed to market risks including fluctuations in hydrocarbon prices, foreign currency rates, interest rates, and electricity prices that can affect the revenues and costs of operating, investing and financing. These risks are managed primarily on a short-term basis with a focus on achieving the highest risk-adjusted returns for Statoil within the given mandate. Long-term exposures are managed at the corporate level, while short-term exposures are managed according to trading strategies and mandates approved by Statoil's corporate risk committee.

In the marketing of commodities Statoil has established guidelines for entering into derivative contracts in order to manage commodity price, foreign currency rate, and interest rate risks. Statoil uses both financial and commodity-based derivatives to manage the risks in revenues, financial items and the present value of future cash flows.mandates.

 

For more information on sensitivity analysis of market risk see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.

 

Commodity price risk

Statoil’s most important long termlong-term commodity risk (oil and natural gas) is related to future market prices asStatoil´s risk policy is to be exposed to both upside and downside price movements. To manage short-term commodity risk, Statoil enters into commodity- based derivative contracts, including futures, options, over-the-counter (OTC) forward contracts, market swaps and contracts for differences related to crude oil, petroleum products, natural gas and electricity. Statoil’s bilateral gas sales portfolio is exposed to various price indices and uses derivatives to manage the net gas sales exposure towards a diversified combination of long and short dated gas price markers.

 

Derivatives associated withThe term of crude oil and refined oil products derivatives are usually less than one year, and they are traded mainly on the Inter Continental Exchange (ICE) in London, the New York Mercantile

Exchange (NYMEX), the OTC Brent market, and crude and refined products swap markets. Derivatives associated withThe term of natural gas and electricity derivatives is usually three years or less, and they are mainly OTC physical forwards and options, NASDAQ OMX Oslo forwards and futures traded on the NYMEX and ICE.

The term of crude oil and refined oil products derivatives is usually less than one year, and the term for natural gas and electricity derivatives is usually three years or less. For more detailed information about Statoil's commodity based derivative financial instruments, see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017167


Currency risk

Statoil's operating results and cash flows are affected by foreign currency fluctuations and the most significant currency is Norwegian Krone (NOK) against United States Dollar (USD). Statoil manages its currency risk from operating activities with USD as the base currency. Foreign exchange risk is managed at corporate level in accordance with established policies and mandates.

Statoil's cash flows from operating activities deriving from oil and gas sales, operating expenses and capital expenditures are mainly in USD, but taxes, and

dividends to shareholders on the Oslo Børs and a share of our operating expenses and capital expenditures are in NOK. Accordingly, Statoil's currency management is primarily linked to mitigate currency risk related to tax and dividend payments in NOK. This means that Statoil regularly purchases substantial NOK, amountsprimarily spot, but also on a forward basis using conventional derivative instruments.

 

Interest rate risk

Bonds are normally issued at fixed rates in a variety of local currencies (among others USD, EuroEUR and Great Britain Pound)GBP). Bonds may beare normally converted to floating USD bonds by using interest rate and currency swaps. Statoil manages its interest rates exposure on its bond debt based on risk and reward considerations from an enterprise risk management perspective. This means that the fix/fixed/floating mix on interest rate exposure may vary from time to time. For more detailed information about Statoil's long-term debt portfolio see note 18 Finance debt.  debt.

 

Liquidity risk

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015179


Liquidity risk is the risk that Statoil will not be able to meet obligations of financial liabilities when they become due. The purpose of liquidity management is

to make certainensure that Statoil has sufficient funds available at all times to cover its financial obligations.

Statoil manages liquidity and funding at the corporate level, ensuring adequate liquidity to cover Statoil's operational requirements. Statoil has a high focus

and attention on credit and liquidity risk. In order to secure necessary financial flexibility, which includes meeting the financial obligations, Statoil maintains a

conservative liquidity management policy. To identify future long-term financing needs, Statoil carries out three-year cash forecasts at least monthly.

 

The main cash outflows are the quarterly dividend payments and Norwegian petroleum tax payments paid six times per year. If the monthly cash flow forecast showsforecasts indicate that the liquid assets one month after tax and dividend payments will fall below the defined policy level,target levels, new long-term funding will be considered.

 

Short-term funding needs will normally be covered by the USD 4.0 5.0 billion US Commercial Papers Programmepapers programme (CP) which is backed by a revolving credit

facility of USD 5.0 billion, supported by 21 core banks, maturing in 20202022The facility supports secure access to funding, supported by the best available short-term rating. As at 31 December 20152017 it has not been drawn.

 

Statoil raises debt in all major capital markets (USA, Europe and Asia) for long-term funding purposes. The policy is to have a smooth maturity profile with

repayments not exceeding five percent5% of capital employed in any year for the nearest five years. Statoil's non-current financial liabilities have a weighted

average maturity of approximately nine years.  

 

For more information about Statoil's non-current financial liabilities see note 18 Finance debtdebt.

 

The table below shows a maturity profile, based on undiscounted contractual cash flows, for Statoil's financial liabilities.

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Due within 1 year

104.9

131.4

14,668

12,756

Due between 1 and 2 years

73.7

43.3

5,331

8,506

Due between 3 and 4 years

86.9

81.3

4,810

6,023

Due between 5 and 10 years

93.8

90.5

11,913

11,045

Due after 10 years

115.5

84.3

11,498

12,905

 

 

 

 

Total specified

474.7

430.8

48,221

51,234

 

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk that Statoil's customerscustomers or counterparties will cause Statoil financial loss by failing to honourhonor their obligations. Credit risk arises from credit exposures with customer accounts receivables as well as from financial investments, derivative financial instruments and deposits with financial institutions.

Key elements of the credit risk management approach include:

·A global credit risk policy

·Credit mandates

·An internal credit rating process

·Credit risk mitigation tools

·A continuous monitoring and managing of credit exposures

 

Prior to entering into transactions with new counterparties, Statoil's credit policy requires all counterparties to be formally identified and approved. In addition, all sales, trading and financial counterparties are assigned internal credit ratings as well as exposure limits. Once established, all counterparties are re-assessed regularlyThe internal credit ratings reflect Statoil's assessment of the counterparties' credit risk and continuously monitored. Counterparty risk assessments are based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of recent financial statements and other relevant business information like past payment performance, the counterparties' size and business diversification. The internal credit ratings reflect Statoil's assessment of the counterparties' credit risk. Exposure limits are determined based on assigned internal credit ratings combined with other factors, such as expected transactionincluding general market and industry characteristics. Credit mandates define acceptable credit risk thresholds andinformation.  All counterparties are endorsed by management.re-assessed regularly.

 

Statoil uses risk mitigation tools to reduce or control credit risk both on a counterparty and portfolio level. The main tools include bank and parental guarantees, prepayments and cash collateral.

 

180Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Statoil has pre-defined limits for the absolute credit risk level allowed at any given time on Statoil's portfolio as well as maximum credit exposures for individual counterparties. Statoil monitors the portfolio on a regular basis and individual exposures against limits on a daily basis. The total credit exposure portfolio of Statoil is geographically diversified among a number of counterparties within the oil and energy sector, as well as larger oil and gas consumers and financial counterparties. The majority of Statoil's credit exposure is with investment grade counterparties.

 

 

1682Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    181


 

The following table contains the carrying amount of Statoil's financial receivables and derivative financial instruments split by Statoil's assessment of the counterparty's credit risk. ThereTrade and other receivables include 2% overdue receivables for 30 days and more. The overdue receivables are no significantmainly joint venture receivables that are past due or impaired. pending the settlement of disputed working interest items payable from Statoil’s working interest partners within its US unconventional activities. Provisions have been made for expected losses.Only non-exchange traded instruments are included in derivative financial instruments.

 

(in NOK billion)

Non-current financial receivables

Trade and other receivables

Non-current derivative financial instruments

Current derivative financial instruments

(in USD million)

Non-current financial receivables

Trade and other receivables

Non-current derivative financial instruments

Current derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

At 31 December 2017

 

 

Investment grade, rated A or above

0.0

14.6

11.9

2.0

262

2,148

1,079

84

Other investment grade

3.3

27.5

11.9

2.4

214

6,135

525

71

Non-investment grade or not rated

2.4

9.3

0.0

0.3

247

278

0

5

 

 

 

 

Total financial asset

5.8

51.4

23.8

4.8

723

8,560

1,603

159

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

At 31 December 2016

 

 

Investment grade, rated A or above

0.0

20.1

15.2

2.4

234

1,682

754

412

Other investment grade

0.0

36.5

11.8

2.7

264

4,090

1,064

75

Non-investment grade or not rated

2.7

17.2

2.9

0.2

210

1,302

0

4

 

 

 

 

Total financial asset

2.7

73.7

29.9

5.3

707

7,074

1,819

491

 

For more information about Trade and other receivables, see note 15 Trade and other receivables.

At 31 December 2015, NOK 10.2 billion2017, USD 704 million of cash was held as collateral to mitigate a portion of Statoil's credit exposure. At 31 December 2014 NOK 12.9 billion2016, USD 571 million was held as collateral. The collateral cash is received as a security to mitigate credit exposure related to positive fair values on interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign exchange swaps. Cash is called as collateral in accordance with the master agreements with the different counterparties when the positive fair values for the different swap agreements are above an agreed threshold.

 

Under the terms of various master netting agreements for derivative financial instruments as of 31 December 2015, NOK 7.0 billion2017, USD 706 million presented as liabilities do not meet the criteria for offsetting. At 31 December 2014, NOK 5.2 billion2016, USD 817 million was not offset. The collateral received and the amounts not offset from derivative financial instrument liabilities, reduce the credit exposure in the derivative financial instruments presented in the table above as they will offset each other in a potential default situation for the counterparty. Trade and other receivables subject to similar master netting agreements USD 502 million have been offset as of 31 December 2017, and respectively USD 364 million as of 31 December 2016.

 

6 Remuneration

 

Full year

Full year

(in NOK billion, except average number of employees)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million, except average number of employees)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

Salaries1)

22.5

23.3

23.5

2,671

2,576

2,791

Pension costs

6.8

3.4

4.6

469

650

846

Payroll tax

3.4

3.5

3.4

387

394

419

Other compensations and social costs

2.5

2.4

2.5

290

276

312

 

 

Total payroll costs

35.2

32.5

34.0

3,818

3,895

4,369

 

 

Average number of employees2)

 22,300  

 23,300  

 23,600  

20,700

21,300

22,300

 

1)     Salaries include bonuses, severance packages and expatriate costs in addition to base pay.

2)     Part time employees amount to 3%, 2% and 3%3% for each of the years 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 respectively.

 

Total payroll expenses are accumulated in cost-pools and partly charged to partners of Statoil operated licences on an hours incurred basis.

 

For further information on pension costs, see note 19 Pensions.

182Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    169


 

Compensation to the board of directors (BoD) and the corporate executive committee (CEC)

Remuneration to members of the BoD and the CEC during the year was as follows:

 

Full year

Full year

(in NOK million)1)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD thousand)1)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

Current employee benefits

92.2

73.2

74.5

11,067

9,270

11,436

Post-employment benefits

6.4

13.0

636

574

799

Other non-current benefits

0.1

0.0

0.1

25

19

15

Share based payment benefits

1.3

1.1

Share-based payment benefits

175

102

167

 

 

Total

100.2

87.3

88.7

11,902

9,966

12,418

 

1)        All figures in the table are presented on accrual basis.

 

At 31 December 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 there are no loans to the members of the BoD or the CEC.

 

Share-based compensation

Statoil's share saving plan provides employees with the opportunity to purchase Statoil shares through monthly salary deductions and a contribution by Statoil. If the shares are kept for two full calendar years of continued employment following the year of purchase, the employees will be allocated one bonus share for each one they have purchased.

 

Estimated compensation expense including the contribution by Statoil for purchased shares, amounts vested for bonus shares granted and related social security tax was NOK 0.5 billion, NOK 0.6 billionUSD 62 million, USD 61 million and NOK 0.6 billionUSD 77 million related to the 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 programs,programmes, respectively. For the 2016 program2018 programme (granted in 2015)2017) the estimated compensation expense is NOK 0.5 billion.USD 72 million. At 31 December 20152017 the amount of compensation cost yet to be expensed throughout the vesting period is NOK 1.2 billion.USD 143 million.

 

7 Other expenses

 

Auditor's remuneration

Auditor's remuneration

Auditor's remuneration

Full year

Full year

(in NOK million, excluding VAT)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million, excluding VAT)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Audit fee

49

45

38

6.1

6.5

6.1

Audit related fee

14

8

0.9

1.0

1.7

Tax fee

0

0.0

0.1

0.0

Other service fee

0

0.0

 

 

Total

63

53

46

7.0

7.5

7.9

 

 

Of total increase in audit and audit related fees, NOK 3.2 million is due to currency effects, equivalent to 5%.

In addition to the figures in the table above, the audit fees and audit related fees related to Statoil operated licences amount to NOK 7 USD 0.8 million, NOK 6 USD 0.8 million and NOK 6USD 0.9 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Research and development expenditures

Research and development (R&D) expenditures were NOK 2.7 billion, NOK 3.0 billionUSD 307 million, USD 298 million and NOK 3.2 billionUSD 344 million in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. R&D expenditures are partly financed by partners of Statoil operated licences. Statoil's share of the expenditures has been recognised as expense in the Consolidated statement of income.

1702Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    183


 

8 Financial items

 

Full year

Full year

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange gains (losses) derivative financial instruments

4.4

(1.5)

(4.1)

(920)

353

548

Other foreign exchange gains (losses)

(6.5)

(0.7)

(4.5)

1,046

(473)

(793)

 

 

Net foreign exchange gains (losses)

(2.1)

(2.2)

(8.6)

126

(120)

(245)

 

 

Dividends received

0.3

0.1

63

46

42

Gains (losses) financial investments

0.4

1.1

1.9

108

(0)

47

Interest income financial investments

0.6

0.7

0.6

64

63

76

Interest income non-current financial receivables

0.2

0.1

24

22

23

Interest income current financial assets and other financial items

1.7

1.8

0.9

228

305

208

 

 

Interest income and other financial items

3.2

4.0

3.6

487

436

396

 

 

Gains (losses) derivative financial instruments

(61)

470

(491)

 

Interest expense bonds and bank loans and net interest on related derivatives

(5.7)

(4.3)

(1.5)

(1,004)

(830)

(707)

Interest expense finance lease liabilities

(0.2)

(0.3)

(0.2)

(26)

(27)

Capitalised borrowing costs

3.2

1.6

1.1

454

355

392

Accretion expense asset retirement obligations

(3.9)

(3.7)

(3.2)

(413)

(420)

(481)

Gains (losses) derivative financial instruments

(3.8)

5.8

(7.4)

Interest expense current financial liabilities and other finance expense

(1.2)

(0.8)

86

(122)

(147)

 

 

Interest and other finance expenses

(11.7)

(1.8)

(12.0)

(903)

(1,043)

(971)

 

 

Net financial items

(10.6)

(0.0)

(17.0)

(351)

(258)

(1,311)

 

Statoil's main financial items relate to assets and liabilities categorised in the held for trading category and the amortised cost category. For more information about financial instruments by category see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.

 

The line item interest expense bonds and bank loans and net interest on related derivatives primarily includes interest expenses of NOK 8.6 billion, NOK 6.8 billionUSD 1,084 million, USD 1,018 million and NOK 5.4 billionUSD 1,041 million from the financial liabilities at amortised cost category. This was partlypartially offset by net interest income on related derivatives from the held for trading category, NOK 2.6 billion, NOK 2.5 billionUSD 80 million, USD 188 million and NOK 3.9 billionUSD 334 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectivelyrespectively.

 

The line item gains (losses) derivative financial instruments primarily includes fair value loss from the held for trading category of NOK 4.0 billion,USD 77 million, a gain of NOK 5.7 billionUSD 454 million and a loss of NOK 7.6 billionUSD 492 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively.

The line item interest expense current financial liabilities and 2013, respectively.other finance expense includes an income of USD 319 million in 2017 related to release of a provision. See note 23 Other commitments and contingencies.

 

Foreign exchange gains (losses) derivative financial instruments include fair value changes of currency derivatives related to liquidity and currency risk.

The line item foreign exchange gains (losses) includes a net foreign exchange lossgain of NOK 9.7 billion,USD 427 million, a loss of NOK 13.4 billionUSD 205 million and a loss of NOK 4.3 billionUSD 1,208 million from the held for trading category for 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

184Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

9 Income taxes

 

Significant components of income tax expense

Significant components of income tax expense

Significant components of income tax expense

Full year

Full year

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

Current income tax expense in respect of current year

52.0

89.6

111.6

(7,680)

(3,869)

(6,488)

Prior period adjustments

0.7

(1.9)

1.3

(124)

(158)

(91)

 

 

Current income tax expense

52.7

87.6

112.9

(7,805)

(4,027)

(6,579)

 

 

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

(12.3)

(0.6)

(13.4)

(904)

1,372

1,519

Change in tax regulations

0.7

0.1

(14)

(50)

(90)

Prior period adjustments

0.4

0.3

(0.4)

(100)

(20)

(74)

 

 

Deferred tax expense

(11.1)

(0.2)

(13.7)

(1,017)

1,302

1,355

 

 

Income tax expense

41.6

87.4

99.2

(8,822)

(2,724)

(5,225)

 

During the normal course of its business, Statoil files tax returns in many different tax regimes. There may be differing interpretation of applicable tax laws and regulations regarding some of the matters in the tax returns. It may inIn certain cases it may take several years to complete the discussions with the relevant tax authorities or to reach a resolution of the tax positions through litigations. Statoil has provided for probable income tax related assets and liabilities based on best estimates reflecting consistent interpretations of the applicable laws and regulations.



Reconciliation of nominal statutory tax rate to effective tax rate

 

Full year

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

4.3

109.4

138.4

 

 

 

 

Calculated income tax at statutory rate1)

(8.5)

31.2

42.4

Calculated Norwegian Petroleum tax2)

33.4

62.8

71.7

Tax effect uplift2)

(6.8)

(6.4)

(5.2)

Tax effect of permanent differences regarding divestments

(3.7)

(6.2)

(12.0)

Tax effect of permanent differences caused by functional currency different from tax currency

(5.8)

(5.1)

(0.4)

Tax effect of other permanent differences

(0.2)

2.2

(3.7)

Change in unrecognised deferred tax assets

28.2

8.7

3.9

Change in tax regulations3)

0.7

0.1

0.1

Prior period adjustments

1.1

(1.7)

0.9

Other items including currency effects

3.2

1.7

1.5

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

41.6

87.4

99.2

 

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

969.3%

79.9%

71.7%

1722Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Reconciliation of statutory tax rate to effective tax rate

 

Full year

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) before tax

13,420

(178)

55

 

 

 

 

Calculated income tax at statutory rate 1)

(3,827)

676

1,078

Calculated Norwegian Petroleum tax 2)

(5,945)

(2,250)

(4,145)

Tax effect uplift2)

784

812

847

Tax effect of permanent differences regarding divestments

(85)

153

468

Tax effect of permanent differences caused by functional currency different from tax currency

(229)

(356)

719

Tax effect of other permanent differences

291

(48)

(2)

Tax effect of dispute with Angolan Ministry of Finance 3)

496

0

0

Change in unrecognised deferred tax assets

(169)

(1,625)

(3,557)

Change in tax regulations

(14)

(50)

(90)

Prior period adjustments

(224)

(177)

(165)

Other items including currency effects

100

141

(376)

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

(8,822)

(2,724)

(5,225)

 

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

65.7%

>(100%)

>100%

 

1)        The weighted average of statutory tax rates was -198.9%positive 28.5% in 2015, 28.5%2017, positive 379.8% in 20142016 and 30.7%negative 1,950.2% in 2013.2015. The negative weightedtax rate in 2017, the high rate in 2016 and the change in average of statutory tax rates for 2015 (198.9%) and the decrease in weighted average tax rates from 20142016 to 20152017 is mainly caused by earnings composition between tax regimes with lower statutory tax rates and tax regimes with higher statutory tax rates. The high tax rate in 2016, the negative rate in 2015 and the change in average statutory tax rates from 2015 to 2016 was mainly caused by earnings composition between tax regimes with lower statutory tax rates and tax regimes with higher statutory tax rates. In both years there are positive income in tax regimes with relatively lower tax rates and losses, including impairments and provisions, in entitiestax regimes with relatively higher than average statutory tax rates. The decrease from 2013 to 2014 was due to changes in the geographic mix of income, and a decrease in the Norwegian statutory tax rate from 28% to 27%.

2)        When computing the petroleum tax of 51% (53%54% (55% from 2016)2018) on income from the Norwegian continental shelf, an additional tax-free allowance, or uplift, is granted at a rate of 5.5% per year on the basis of the original capitalised cost of offshore production installations. The uplift may be deducted from taxable income for a period of four years starting in the year in which the capital expenditure is incurred. For investments made prior to 5 May 2013,in 2017 the uplift is calculated at a rate of 5.4% per year, while the rate is 7.5%5.5% per year.year for investments made in 2014-2016. The rate is 5.3% per year from 2018 for new investments. Transitional rules apply to investments from 5 May 2013 covered by among others Plans for development and operation (PDOs) or Plans for installation and operation (PIOs) submitted to the Ministry of Oil and Energy prior to 5 May 2013. The uplift may be deducted from taxable income for a period of four years, starting inFor these investments the year in which the capital expenditurerate is incurred.7.5% per year. Unused uplift may be carried forward indefinitely. At year end 20152017 and 2014,2016, unrecognised uplift credits amounted to NOK 20.6 billionUSD 2,003 million and NOK 21.1 billion,USD 2,121 million, respectively.

3)        The increase from 2014 to 2015 is mainly related to changeTax effect of dispute with Angolan Ministry of Finance as described in deferred taxes caused by a reduction in Norwegian statutory tax rate from 27% to 25% effective from 2016.note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    185173


 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities comprise

Deferred tax assets and liabilities comprise

Deferred tax assets and liabilities comprise

(in NOK billion)

Tax losses carried forward

Property, plant and equipment

and Intangible assets

Asset removal obligation

Pensions

Derivatives

Other

Total

(in USD million)

Tax losses carried forward

Property, plant and equipment

and Intangible assets

Asset removal obligation

Pensions

Derivatives

Other

Total

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax at 31 December 2015

 

 

Deferred tax at 31 December 2017

Deferred tax at 31 December 2017

 

 

Deferred tax assets

41.8

1.6

61.5

5.1

0.1

7.0

117.1

4,459

259

8,049

738

34

763

14,302

Deferred tax liabilities

(0.0)

(147.4)

0.0

(0.0)

(8.2)

(9.1)

(164.6)

(0)

(19,027)

0

(11)

(27)

(451)

(19,515)

 

 

 

 

Net asset (liability) at 31 December 2015

41.8

(145.7)

61.5

5.1

(8.1)

(2.1)

(47.6)

Net asset (liability) at 31 December 2017

4,459

(18,768)

8,049

728

7

312

(5,213)

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax at 31 December 2014

 

 

Deferred tax at 31 December 2016

Deferred tax at 31 December 2016

 

 

Deferred tax assets

36.7

4.6

73.3

7.0

0.2

13.4

135.3

4,283

233

7,078

743

138

849

13,323

Deferred tax liabilities

(0.0)

(172.6)

0.0

(12.9)

(8.4)

(193.8)

0

(16,797)

0

(270)

(488)

(17,555)

 

 

 

 

Net asset (liability) at 31 December 2014

36.7

(167.9)

73.3

7.0

(12.7)

4.9

(58.6)

Net asset (liability) at 31 December 2016

4,283

(16,564)

7,078

743

(132)

361

(4,231)



 

Changes in net deferred tax liability during the year were as follows:

Changes in net deferred tax liability during the year were as follows:

Changes in net deferred tax liability during the year were as follows:

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

Net deferred tax liability at 1 January

58.6

62.8

77.3

4,231

5,399

7,881

Charged (credited) to the Consolidated statement of income

(11.1)

(0.2)

(13.7)

1,017

(1,302)

(1,355)

Other comprehensive income

2.8

(0.9)

(1.5)

38

(129)

461

Translation differences and other

(2.7)

(3.0)

0.7

(73)

264

(1,588)

 

 

Net deferred tax liability at 31 December

47.6

58.6

62.8

5,213

4,231

5,399

 


Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset to the extent that the deferred taxes relate to the same fiscal authority, and there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities. After netting deferred tax assets and liabilities by fiscal entity, deferred taxes are presented on the balance sheet as follows:

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

Deferred tax assets

17.8

12.9

2,441

2,195

Deferred tax liabilities

65.4

71.5

7,654

6,427

 

Deferred tax assets are recognised based on the expectation that sufficient taxable income will be available through reversal of taxable temporary differences or future taxable income.income supported by business forecast. At year end 20152017 and 20142016 the deferred tax assets of NOK 17.8 billionUSD 2,441 million and NOK 12.9 billion,USD 2,195 million, respectively, were primarily recognised in Norway, Angola, Brasil and the UK. Of these amounts USD 924 million and USD 1,258 million, respectively, is recognised in entities which have suffered a loss in either the current or preceding period.

Unrecognised deferred tax assets

Unrecognised deferred tax assets

Unrecognised deferred tax assets

At 31 December

At 31 December

2015

2014

2017

2016

(in NOK billion)

Basis

Tax

Basis

Tax

(in USD million)

Basis

Tax

Basis

Tax

 

 

 

 

 

Deductible temporary differences

21.6

8.9

11.0

3.2

3,415

1,409

3,431

1,360

Tax losses carried forward

126.2

46.7

52.5

18.0

17,412

4,661

17,440

6,557

 

 

 

 

 

Total

147.8

55.6

63.5

21.2

20,827

6,070

20,871

7,917

 

The movement in tax value of unrecognised deferred tax assets in the table above compared to reported change in unrecognised deferred tax assets in the table Reconciliation of nominal statutory tax rate to effective tax rate is mainly caused by currency effects.

Approximately 11%16% of the unrecognised carry forward tax losses can be carried forward indefinitely. The majority of the remaining part of the unrecognised tax losses expire after 2026. 2028. The unrecognised deductible temporary differences do not expire under the current tax legislation. Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of these items because currently there is insufficient evidence to support that future taxable profits will be available to secure utilisation of the benefits.

1861742   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


At year end 2017 unrecognised deferred tax assets in the US and Angola represents USD 3,559 million and USD 879 million of the total unrecognised deferred tax assets of USD 6,070 million. Similar amounts for 2016 were USD 5,655 million in the US and USD 800 million in Angola of a total of USD 7,917 million. The reduction in unrecognised deferred tax assets in the US of USD 2,096 million is mainly caused by the change in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.

10 Property, plant and equipment

(in USD million)

Machinery, equipment and transportation equipment, including vessels

Production plants and oil and gas assets

Refining and manufacturing plants

Buildings and land

Assets under development

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2016

3,394

142,750

8,262

859

17,315

172,579

Additions and transfers

56

10,181

331

47

111

10,727

Disposals at cost

(7)

0

(288)

(50)

(30)

(374)

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

27

4,602

342

10

743

5,724

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2017

3,470

157,533

8,646

866

18,140

188,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2016

(2,767)

(100,971)

(5,772)

(446)

(3,068)

(113,023)

Depreciation

(122)

(9,051)

(485)

(29)

0

(9,688)

Impairment losses

0

(917)

(0)

0

0

(917)

Reversal of impairment losses

48

935

0

0

989

1,972

Transfers

0

(422)

(1)

(0)

370

(53)

Accumulated depreciation and impairment disposed assets

5

(24)

285

39

18

323

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

(17)

(3,331)

(227)

(4)

(55)

(3,634)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2017

(2,853)

(113,781)

(6,200)

(439)

(1,746)

(125,019)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount at 31 December 2017

617

43,753

2,446

427

16,394

63,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated useful lives (years)

3-20

UoP1)

15 - 20

20 - 332)

 

 


 

Total unrecognised deferred tax assets relates to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

 

 

 

US

39.3

12.3

Angola

5.7

0.0

Ireland

2.5

1.8

Canada

2.4

1.9

Netherlands

1.7

1.4

Other

4.0

3.8

 

 

 

Total

55.6

21.2

10 Earnings per share

The weighted average number of ordinary shares is the basis for computing the basic and diluted earnings per share as disclosed in the Consolidated statement of income. The dilutive effect relates to treasury shares.

 

At 31 December

(in millions)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

3,179.4

3,180.0

3,180.7

Weighted average number of ordinary shares, diluted

3,188.8

3,188.9

3,188.9

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share for income attributable to equity holders of the company:

 

 

 

Basic (NOK)

-11.80

6.89

12.53

Diluted (NOK)

-11.80

6.87

12.50

11 Property, plant and equipment

(in NOK billion)

Machinery, equipment and transportation equipment, including vessels

Production plants and oil and gas assets

Refining and manufacturing plants

Buildings and land

Assets under development

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2014

 26.1  

 1,037.5  

 64.6  

 10.1  

 164.7  

 1,303.0  

Additions and transfers

 0.4  

 79.3  

 5.0  

 0.6  

 10.1  

 95.5  

Disposals at cost2)

 (0.2) 

 (13.2) 

 (8.0) 

 (3.5) 

 (9.3) 

 (34.2) 

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 4.2  

 70.3  

 4.1  

 1.0  

 13.2  

 92.8  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2015

 30.5  

 1,174.0  

 65.7  

 8.2  

 178.7  

 1,457.1  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2014

 (20.1) 

 (656.7) 

 (48.2) 

 (4.8) 

 (11.1) 

 (740.9) 

Depreciation

 (1.4) 

 (81.9) 

 (2.2) 

 (0.4) 

 0.0  

 (85.9) 

Impairment losses and transfers

 0.0  

 (27.5) 

 (0.5) 

 (0.0) 

 (20.8) 

 (48.7) 

Reversal of impairment losses

 0.0  

 0.8  

 4.0  

 0.1  

 0.2  

 5.0  

Accumulated depreciation and impairment disposed assets2)

 0.0  

 6.6  

 2.6  

 1.5  

 (0.0) 

 10.8  

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 (3.4) 

 (40.9) 

 (3.1) 

 (0.5) 

 (3.2) 

 (51.1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2015

 (24.9) 

 (799.5) 

 (47.4) 

 (4.1) 

 (34.9) 

 (910.8) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount at 31 December 2015

 5.6  

 374.4  

 18.3  

 4.0  

 143.8  

 546.2  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated useful lives (years)

3-20

1)

15 - 20

20 - 33

 

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015187


(in NOK billion)

Machinery, equipment and transportation equipment, including vessels

Production plants and oil and gas assets

Refining and manufacturing plants

Buildings and land

Assets under development

Total

(in USD million)

Machinery, equipment and transportation equipment, including vessels

Production plants and oil and gas assets

Refining and manufacturing plants

Buildings and land

Assets under development

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2013

 21.1  

 869.9  

 60.2  

 8.4  

 135.5  

 1,095.1  

Cost at 31 December 2015

3,466

133,269

7,459

928

20,284

165,406

Additions and transfers

 1.0  

 108.4  

 2.0  

 0.7  

 23.8  

 135.9  

62

11,960

776

70

(2,148)

10,720

Disposals at cost

 (0.1) 

 (8.5) 

 (1.4) 

 (0.0) 

 (8.9) 

 (18.9) 

(98)

(1,857)

(48)

(130)

(445)

(2,577)

Assets reclassified to held for sale (HFS)

(7)

(2,169)

0

(12)

(51)

(2,239)

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 4.1  

 67.7  

 3.8  

 1.1  

 14.3  

 91.0  

(30)

1,546

75

2

(325)

1,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2014

 26.1  

 1,037.5  

 64.6  

 10.1  

 164.7  

 1,303.0  

Cost at 31 December 2016

3,394

142,750

8,262

859

17,315

172,579

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2013

 (15.5) 

 (540.1) 

 (44.9) 

 (3.8) 

 (3.3) 

 (607.7) 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2015

(2,826)

(90,762)

(5,386)

(468)

(3,958)

(103,400)

Depreciation

 (1.2) 

 (71.0) 

 (1.8) 

 (0.3) 

 (0.0) 

 (74.4) 

(137)

(9,657)

(411)

(31)

0

(10,235)

Impairment losses

 (0.3) 

 (16.1) 

 (1.2) 

 (0.2) 

 (7.1) 

 (24.8) 

(0)

(1,672)

(240)

(12)

(969)

(2,893)

Reversal of impairment losses

 0.0  

 0.3  

 1.8  

 0.0  

 0.2  

 2.3  

0

1,186

371

0

35

1,592

Transfers

71

(2,013)

(79)

(0)

1,789

(232)

Accumulated depreciation and impairment disposed assets

 0.1  

 5.7  

 (0.2) 

 0.0  

 (0.0) 

 5.7  

91

1,231

44

57

14

1,437

Accumulated depreciation and impairment assets classified as HFS

6

1,757

0

8

22

1,794

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 (3.2) 

 (35.4) 

 (2.0) 

 (0.5) 

 (1.0) 

 (42.0) 

28

(1,042)

(71)

1

(1)

(1,086)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2014

 (20.1) 

 (656.7) 

 (48.2) 

 (4.8) 

 (11.1) 

 (740.9) 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2016

(2,767)

(100,971)

(5,772)

(446)

(3,068)

(113,023)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount at 31 December 2014

 6.0  

 380.8  

 16.4  

 5.3  

 153.6  

 562.1  

Carrying amount at 31 December 2016

626

41,779

2,490

413

14,247

59,556

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated useful lives (years)

3-20

1)

15 - 20

20 - 33

 

3-20

UoP 1)

15 - 20

20 - 33 2)

 

 

 

1)        Depreciation according to unit of production method (UoP), see note 2 Significant accounting policies

2)        Includes NOK 5.8 billion related to a change in the classification of Statoil’s investment in the Sheringham Shoal Windfarm (Scira Offshore Energy Ltd) from joint operation (pro-rata line by line consolidation) to joint venture (equity method) following changes in the joint operating agreements.Land is not depreciated

The carrying amount of assets transferred to Property, plant and equipmentfrom Intangible assets in 20152017 and 20142016 amounted to NOK 2.7 billionUSD 401 million and NOK 9.5 billion,USD 692 million, respectively.

Impairments
During 2015 and 2014, Statoil recognised total net impairment losses of NOK 63.3 billion and NOK 38.2 billion respectively on Property, plant and equipmentand Intangible assets.

(in NOK billion)

Property, plant and equipment

Intangible assets3)

Total

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

Producing and development assets1)

43.8

9.8

53.5

Goodwill1)

0.0

4.2

4.2

Acquisition costs related to oil and gas prospects2)

0.0

5.6

5.6

 

 

 

 

Total net impairment losses recognised

43.8

19.6

63.3

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

Producing and development assets1)

22.5

6.0

28.5

Goodwill1)

0.0

4.2

4.2

Acquisition costs related to oil and gas prospects2)

0.0

5.5

5.5

 

 

 

 

Total net impairment losses recognised

22.5

15.7

38.2

(in USD million)

Property, plant and equipment

Intangible assets3)

Total

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

 

 

 

Producing and development assets 1)

(1,056)

(326)

(1,381)

Acquisition costs related to oil and gas prospects 2)

-

245

245

 

 

 

 

Total net impairment loss/(reversal) recognised

(1,056)

(81)

(1,137)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

 

 

 

Producing and development assets 1)

1,301

590

1,890

Acquisition costs related to oil and gas prospects 2)

-

403

403

 

 

 

 

Total net impairment loss/(reversal) recognised

1,301

992

2,293

 

1)         Producing and development assets and goodwill are subject to impairment assessment under IAS 36. The total net impairment lossesreversal recognised under IAS 36 in 2015 and 20142017 amount to NOK 57.7 billionUSD 1,381 million, compared to 2016 when the net impairment loss amounted to USD 1,890 million, including impairment reversals and NOK 32.7 billion, respectively, including impairmentimpairments of acquisition costs - oil and gas prospects (intangible assets).

2)         Acquisition costs related to exploration activities, subject to impairment assessment under the successful efforts method.method (IFRS 6).

3)         See note 1211 Intangible assets.assets.

1881762   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

In assessing the need forFor impairment of the carrying amount of a potentially impaired asset,purposes, the asset's carrying amount is compared to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less cost of disposal (FVLCOD) and estimated value in use (VIU).

The base discount rate for VIU calculations is 6.5%6.0% real after tax. The discount rate is derived from Statoil's weighted average cost of capital. A derived pre-tax discount rate would generally be in the range of 8-12%7-12%, depending on asset specific characteristics, such as specific tax treatments, cash flow profiles and economic life. The rates are not changed from last year. For certain assets a pre-tax discount rate could be outside this range, mainly due to special tax elements (for example permanent differences) affecting the pre-tax equivalent. See note 2 Significant accounting policies for further information regarding impairment on property, plant and equipment.

 

(in NOK billion)

Impairment method

Carrying amount before impairment

Carrying amount after impairment

Net impairment loss

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

Development and Production Norway

VIU

14.5

11.0

3.5

Development and Production International

VIU

219.5

171.2

48.3

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

VIU

5.2

8.7

(3.5)

 

 

 

 

 

Development and Production Norway

FVLCOD

22.9

17.7

5.2

Development and Production International

FVLCOD

4.2

0.0

4.2

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

FVLCOD

0.0

0.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

266.3

208.6

57.7

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

Development and Production Norway

VIU

5.2

2.9

2.3

Development and Production International

VIU

187.9

168.4

19.5

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

VIU

8.8

7.9

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

Development and Production Norway

FVLCOD

18.3

18.3

0.0

Development and Production International

FVLCOD

25.4

15.4

10.0

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

FVLCOD

0.0

0.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

245.6

212.9

32.7

 

 

2017

2016

 

(in USD million)

Impairment method

Carrying amount after impairment 1)

Net impairment loss (reversal)

Carrying amount after impairment 1)

Net impairment loss (reversal)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration & Production Norway

VIU

2,169

(826)

3,115

760

 

 

FVLCOD

1,507

(80)

1,401

69

 

North America - unconventional

VIU

5,017

(1,266)

6,183

945

 

 

FVLCOD

1,422

856

 484 2)

412

 

North America Conventional offshore US Gulf of Mexico

VIU

1,200

(17)

4,459

141

 

 

FVLCOD

0

0

0

0

 

North Africa

VIU

0

0

0

104

 

 

FVLCOD

0

0

0

0

 

Sub-Saharan Africa

VIU

0

0

772

(137)

 

 

FVLCOD

0

0

0

0

 

Europe and Asia

VIU

0

0

1,124

(330)

 

 

FVLCOD

0

0

0

0

 

Marketing, Midstream & Processing

VIU

263

(48)

1,088

(74)

 

 

FVLCOD

0

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

11,578

(1,381)

18,625

1,890

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) Carrying amount relates to assets impaired/reversed.

 

2) Asset sold in 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During 20152017 net impairment losses of NOK 57.7 billion werereversal USD 1,381 million was recognised on producing and development assets and goodwill,assets. For 2016 the net impairment loss recognised was USD 1,890 million primarily due to declining commodity price forecasts (primarily oil). The recoverable amount of assets tested for impairment was mainly based on VIU estimates on the basis of internal forecasts on costs, production profiles and commodity prices. For short term commodity prices, observed forward oil and gas price curves for the first two to three yearshave been used. Long term commodity price forecasts are based on internal price forecasts. The FVLCOD have partly been established through comparisons with observed market transactions and bids, and partly through internally prepared net present value estimates using assumed market participant assumptions. During 2014 impairment losses of NOK 32.7 billion were recognised on producing and development assets and goodwill.

 

Development andExploration & Production Norway (DPN)

In the DPN segmentExploration & Production Norway net impairment lossesreversal of NOK 8.7 billion wereUSD 906 million was recognised in 2015, which were2017, mainly related to conventional offshore assets in the development phase. The net impairment losses werereversal was mainly triggered by reduction in commodity priceincreased reserves, cost reductions and project delays.increased short term price assumptions. In 2014 2016 impairment lossesloss of NOK 2.3 billion wereUSD 829 million was recognised.

Development and Production International (DPI)

North America - unconventional

In the DPI segment net impairment losses of NOK 52.5 billion were recognised in 2015 of which NOK 28.3 billion related to unconventional onshore assets in USA, including NOK 4.2 billion of goodwill allocated to these assets. NOK 24.1 billion related to other conventional assets which were not considered significant on an individual cash generating unit level. Impairment losses of NOK 42.7 billion were recognised as Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses and NOK 9.8 billion as Exploration expenses, based on the impaired asset’s nature. In 2014 impairment losses of NOK 29.5 billion were recognised.

The net impairment losses related to the unconventional onshore assets in North America were mainly a result from reduced long term commodity price assumptions partly offset by operational performance improvements and cost reductions. The net impairment losses related to other conventional assets were primarily related to reduced commodity price assumptions, but also included an impairment loss related to an asset under development in the Gulf of Mexico due to installation damages and a consequential start-up delay.

Marketing, Midstream and Processing (MMP)

– unconventional areaThe MMP segment recognised a net impairment reversal of NOK 3.5USD 410 million was recognised in 2015 mainly related to a refinery. The2017.

An impairment reversal of impairmentUSD 1,266 of which USD 517 million is classified as exploration expenses, was triggered by changes in US tax legislation, including a change in the corporate tax from 35% to 21%. Operational improvements and increased refinery marginsrecovery rate also influenced the impairment reversal.

An impairment loss of USD 856 million of which USD 191 million is classified as exploration expenses, was triggered by changes in the operational plan following lower than expected production and a significant reduction in expected reserves. To establish the recoverable amount assessed to be fair value less cost of disposal for the impaired asset, Statoil made use of an independent third – party valuation expert as part of the determination. Statoil considered both discounted cash flow calculation and comparable market multiples when determining the fair value less cost of disposal. The primary basis for arriving at the recoverable amount estimate was the use of discounted cash flow calculations which is a level 3 valuation as defined in IFRS 13. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow calculations were future commodity prices, the expected operational improvements. plan and ultimate recovery rate as well as the discount rates used. The price assumptions used were based on 3 years observable forward prices and maintaining flat real price assumptions thereafter. The discount rate used was 7-9% for proved properties and 12-14% for unproved properties in nominal terms after tax with an additional risking for certain elements. In 2014addition to the change in operational plan, the recoverable amount reflects, among other factors, worsening market sentiment around the shale play associated with the impaired asset and somewhat reduced commodity price outlook.

In 2016 net impairment lossesloss of NOK 0.9 billion were recognised.USD 1,357 million was recognised in the North America – unconventional area.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    189177


 

Sensitivities

Throughout 2015North America Conventional offshore Gulf of Mexico

In 2017 the North America Conventional offshore Gulf of Mexico area recognised net impairment reversal of USD 17 million. In 2016 the net impairment loss was USD 141 million.

Marketing, Midstream & Processing

Marketing, Midstream & Processing recognised an impairment reversal of USD 48 million in 2017. In 2016 net reversal was USD 74 million.

In the North Africa, Sub – Saharan and subsequentEurope and Asia areas no impairments or reversals were recognised in 2017. In 2016 total net reversal in these areas were USD 363 million.

Value in Use (VIU) estimates and discounted cash flows used to year end,determine the recoverable amount of assets tested for impairment are based on internal forecasts on costs, production profiles and commodity prices. Short term commodity prices (2018/2019/2020) are forecasted by using observable forward prices for 2018 and a linear projection towards the 2021 internal forecast.

The price assumptions used for impairment calculations were generally as follows (prices used in 2016 impairment calculations for the respective years are indicated in brackets):

Year

Prices in real terms1)

2018

 

2020

 

2025

 

2030

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brent Blend – USD/bbl

60

(62)

 

67

(75)

 

77

(78)

 

80

(80)

NBP - USD/mmBtu

6.6

(6.0)

 

6.5

(6.0)

 

8.0

(8.0)

 

8.0

(8.0)

Henry Hub – USD/mmBtu

2.9

(3.6)

 

3.5

(4.0)

 

4.0

(4.0)

 

4.0

(4.0)

1) Basis year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sensitivities

Commodity prices have continued to behistorically been volatile. Significant downward adjustments of Statoil’s commodity price assumptions would result in impairment losses on certain producing and development assets in Statoil’s portfolio. The table below presents an estimate of the carrying amount of producing and development assets, that would be subject to impairment assessment ifIf a further decline in commodity price forecasts over the lifetime of the assets were 20%. The20%, considered to represent a reasonably likely change, the impairment amount to be recognised could illustratively be in the region of USD 11 billion before tax effects. This illustrative impairment sensitivity has been established on the assumption that allassumes no changes to input factors other than prices; however, a price reduction of 20% is likely to result in changes in business plans as well as other factors used when estimating an asset’s recoverable amount. Changes in such input factors would remain unchanged.

Carrying amount of producing and development assets which would be subject to impairment assessment assuming an additional decline in commodity price forecasts of 20%:

(in NOK billion)

Development and Production Norway

Development and Production International

Marketing, Midstream and Processing

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount subject to impairment assessment in 2015 (after impairment)1)

 48  

 230  

 9  

 287  

Sensitivity: commodity price decline by 20%2)

 52  

 253  

N/A

 305  

1)Relates to assets subject tolikely significantly reduce the actual impairment assessment under IAS 36. As a result of these impairment assessments, Statoil recognised a net impairment loss of NOK 57.7 billion and 32.7 billion in 2015 and 2014 respectively, as described above.

2)The sensitivity which is reflected in this line, relatesamount compared to the carrying amount of assets subject to impairment assessment under IAS 36. Exploration and evaluation assets accounted for under IFRS 6 are not included.

The informationillustrative sensitivity above. Changes that could be expected would include a reduction in the table abovecost level in the oil and gas industry as well as offsetting currency effects, both of which have historically occurred following significant changes in commodity prices. The illustrative sensitivity is for indicative purposes only.therefore not considered to represent a best estimate of an expected impairment impact, nor an estimated impact on revenues or operating income in such a scenario. A significant and prolonged declinereduction in commodityoil and gas prices would affect other assumptions, e.g. cost level, currency etc. A general decline in commodity price assumptions of 20% wouldalso result in mitigating actions by Statoil by optimising the respectiveand its licence partners, as a reduction of oil and gas prices would impact drilling plans and production profiles for new and existing assets. Quantifying such impacts is considered impracticable, as it requires detailed technical, geological and economical evaluations based on hypothetical scenarios and not based on existing business plans in order to reduce the exposure to changes in the macro environment. Considering the substantial uncertainties related to other relevant assumptions that would be triggered by a significant and prolonged decline in commodity price forecasts, Statoil does not disclose the expected impairment amount.

or development plans.

12 Intangible assets

(in NOK billion)

Exploration expenses

Acquisition costs - oil and gas prospects

Goodwill

Other

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2014

 22.9  

 53.4  

 12.1  

 3.4  

 91.8  

Additions

 9.5  

 4.5  

 0.0  

 (0.2) 

 13.8  

Disposals at cost

 (0.5) 

 (2.3) 

 (0.1) 

 (0.2) 

 (3.0) 

Transfers

 (0.7) 

 (2.0) 

 0.0  

 (0.0) 

 (2.7) 

Expensed exploration expenditures previously capitalised

 (1.7) 

 (15.4) 

 0.0  

 0.0  

 (17.1) 

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 3.1  

 7.7  

 1.7  

 0.5  

 13.0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2015

 32.6  

 45.9  

 13.8  

 3.6  

 95.8  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2014

 

 

 (5.2) 

 (1.4) 

 (6.6) 

Amortisation and impairments for the year

 

 

 (4.2) 

 (0.0) 

 (4.2) 

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 

 

 (1.5) 

 (0.2) 

 (1.8) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2015

 

 

 (10.9) 

 (1.6) 

 (12.5) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount at 31 December 2015

 32.6  

 45.9  

 2.8  

 2.0  

 83.3  

1901782   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

11 Intangible assets

(in NOK billion)

Exploration expenses

Acquisition costs - oil and gas prospects

Goodwill

Other

Total

(in USD million)

Exploration expenses

Acquisition costs - oil and gas prospects

Goodwill

Other

Total

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2013

 20.3  

 58.6  

 10.5  

 3.1  

 92.4  

Cost at 31 December 2016

2,856

5,907

1,570

346

10,679

Additions

 7.1  

 1.5  

 0.0  

 (0.0) 

 8.7  

154

861

0

94

1,109

Disposals at cost

 (0.9) 

 (0.7) 

 (0.0) 

 (0.3) 

 (1.8) 

(0)

0

(26)

Transfers

 (4.1) 

 (5.5) 

 0.0  

 (9.5) 

(276)

(124)

0

(0)

(401)

Assets reclassified to held for sale

0

(1,369)

0

(1,369)

Expensed exploration expenditures previously capitalised

 (2.7) 

 (11.1) 

 0.0  

 (13.7) 

(73)

81

0

8

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 3.1  

 10.5  

 1.7  

 0.6  

 15.7  

56

6

11

4

77

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2014

 22.9  

 53.4  

 12.1  

 3.4  

 91.8  

Cost at 31 December 2017

2,715

5,363

1,581

419

10,077

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2013

 

 0.0  

 (0.9) 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2016

 

(1,242)

(195)

(1,437)

Amortisation and impairments for the year

 

 (4.2) 

 (0.3) 

 (4.5) 

 

0

(12)

Amortisation and impairment losses disposed intangible assets

 

0

(6)

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 

 (1.0) 

 (0.2) 

 (1.2) 

 

0

(2)

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2014

 

 (5.2) 

 (1.4) 

 (6.6) 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2017

 

(1,242)

(215)

(1,457)

 

 

Carrying amount at 31 December 2014

 22.9  

 53.4  

 6.9  

 2.0  

 85.2  

Carrying amount at 31 December 2017

2,715

5,363

339

204

8,621



(in USD million)

Exploration expenses

Acquisition costs - oil and gas prospects

Goodwill

Other

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2015

3,701

5,207

1,565

402

10,875

Additions

246

2,477

0

(8)

2,715

Disposals at cost

(0)

(311)

0

(42)

(353)

Transfers

(298)

(392)

0

(2)

(692)

Assets reclassified to held for sale

(19)

(78)

0

0

(97)

Expensed exploration expenditures previously capitalised

(808)

(992)

0

0

(1,800)

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

33

(3)

5

(4)

31

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost at 31 December 2016

2,856

5,907

1,570

346

10,679

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2015

 

 

(1,242)

(182)

(1,423)

Amortisation and impairments for the year

 

 

0

(13)

(13)

Amortisation and impairment losses disposed intangible assets

 

 

0

(2)

(2)

Effect of changes in foreign exchange

 

 

0

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at 31 December 2016

 

 

(1,242)

(195)

(1,437)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying amount at 31 December 2016

2,856

5,907

328

151

9,243

 

The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed to be either finite or indefinite. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortised systematically over their estimated economic lives, ranging between 10-20 years.years.

During 2015,2017, intangible assets were impacted by impairmentsnet impairment reversal of signature bonuses and acquisition costs totalling USD 326 million related to North America – unconventional assets and net impairment of acquisition costs related to exploration activities of NOK 5.6 billionUSD 245 million primarily as a result from dry wells and uncommercial discoveries in Angola and theUS Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, Mexico and South America.

Statoil, recognised impairments of NOK 9.8 billion primarily related to unconventional onshore assets in USA and goodwill related to US onshore assets of NOK 4.2 billion.Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017179 


Impairment losses and reversals of impairment losses are presented as Exploration expensesand Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses on the basis of their nature as exploration assets (intangible assets) and other intangible assets, respectively. The impairment losses and reversal of impairment losses are based on recoverable amount estimates triggered by changes in reserve estimates, cost estimates and market conditions. See note 1110 Property, plant and equipment for more information on the basis for impairment assessments.

 

The table below shows the aging of capitalised exploration expenditures.

The table below shows the aging of capitalised exploration expenditures.

The table below shows the aging of capitalised exploration expenditures.

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Less than one year

 12.8  

 9.2  

218

311

Between one and five years

 16.9  

 11.4  

1,799

2,216

More than five years

 2.9  

 2.3  

698

329

 

 

 

Total

 32.6  

 22.9  

2,715

2,856



 

The table below shows the components of the exploration expenses.

The table below shows the components of the exploration expenses.

The table below shows the components of the exploration expenses.

Full year

Full year

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

Exploration expenditures

 23.1  

 23.9  

 21.8  

1,234

1,437

2,860

Expensed exploration expenditures previously capitalised

 17.1  

 13.7  

 3.1  

(8)

1,800

2,164

Capitalised exploration

 (9.2) 

 (7.3) 

 (6.9) 

(167)

(285)

(1,151)

 

 

Exploration expenses

 31.0  

 30.3  

 18.0  

1,059

2,952

3,872

12 Equity accounted investments

(in USD million)

Lundin Petroleum AB

Other equity accounted investments

Total

Investment at 31 December 2016

1,121

1,124

2,245

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

126

62

188

Acquisitions and increase in paid in capital

0

399

399

Dividend and other distributions

(78)

(112)

(190)

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

(44)

82

38

Divestments, derecognition and decrease in paid in capital

0

(129)

(129)

 

 

 

 

Investment at 31 December 2017

1,125

1,426

2,551

Voting rights corresponds to ownership.

1802Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Summary financial information of equity accounted investments

The following table provides summarised financial information relating to Lundin Petroleum AB. This information is presented on aStatoil’s ownership basis (20.1%) and also reflects adjustments made by Statoil to Lundin Petroleum AB’s own results in applying the equity method of accounting. Statoil adjusts Lundin Petroleum AB’s results for depreciation of excess values determined in the purchase price allocation at the date of acquisition. Where there are significant differences in accounting policies, adjustments are made to bring the accounting policies applied in line with Statoil’s. These adjustments have increased the reported net income for 2017, as shown in the table below, compared with the equivalent amount reported by Lundin Petroleum AB.

 

 

 

 

 

Lundin Petroleum AB

(in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

101

69

Non-Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

2,920

3,069

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(62)

(70)

Non-Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(1,834)

(1,947)

Net assets

 

 

 

 

 

1,125

1,121

Year ended 31 December

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross revenues

 

 

 

 

 

376

135

Income/(loss) before tax

 

 

 

 

 

226

(83)

Net income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

126

(78)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

250

589

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In April 2017 Lundin Petroleum completed a spin-off of its assets in Malaysia, France and the Netherlands into International Petroleum Corporation (IPC) by distributing the IPC share, on a pro-rata basis, to Lundin Petroleum shareholders. IPC prepared a repurchasing programme whereas they would repurchase own shares up to a certain amount, Statoil used the opportunity to sell its issued shares in the spin-off to IPC’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Lundin Petroleum BV. The sale did not result in material gain or loss.

Statoil’s share of Lundin Petroleum AB’s quoted market value as per 31.12.2017 was USD 1,565 million.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    191181


13 Financial investments and non-current prepayments

 

Non-current financial investments

Non-current financial investments

Non-current financial investments

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Bonds

12.4

11.6

1,611

1,362

Listed equity securities

6.3

6.6

619

731

Non-listed equity securities

1.8

1.4

611

251

 

 

 

Financial investments

20.6

19.6

2,841

2,344

 

Bonds and listed equity securities relate to investment portfolios which are held by Statoil's captive insurance company andwhich mainly are accounted for using the fair value option.

Non-current prepayments and financial receivables

Non-current prepayments and financial receivables

Non-current prepayments and financial receivables

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Financial receivables interest bearing

6.7

3.7

716

698

Prepayments and other non-interest bearing receivables

1.8

2.0

196

195

 

 

 

Prepayments and financial receivables

8.5

5.7

912

893

 

Financial receivables interest bearing primarily relate to project financing of equity accounted companycompanies and loans to employees.

 

Current financial investments

Current financial investments

Current financial investments

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Time deposits

19.1

9.8

4,111

3,242

Interest bearing securities

67.4

49.4

4,337

4,970

 

 

 

Financial investments

86.5

59.2

8,448

8,211

 

At 31 December 20152017, current fFinancialinancial investments  include NOK 6.0 billionUSD 714 million investment portfolios which are held by Statoil's captive insurance company andwhich mainly are accounted for using the fair value option. The corresponding balance at 31 December 20142016 was NOK 6.0 billion.USD 818 million.

For information about financial instruments by category, see note 25  Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.risk.

 

14 Inventories

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Crude oil

10.7

10.1

2,323

1,966

Petroleum products

5.1

6.0

596

744

Natural gas

149

160

Other

6.3

7.7

330

358

 

 

 

 

Inventories

22.0

23.7

3,398

3,227

 

Other inventory consists of natural gas, spare parts and operational materials, including drilling and well equipment.

The write-down of inventories from cost to net realisable value amounted to an expense of NOK 3.9 billionUSD 32 million and NOK 4.0 billionUSD 74 million in 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

1921822   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

15 Trade and other receivables

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Trade receivables

39.3

57.8

7,649

5,504

Current financial receivables

6.5

6.9

427

862

Joint venture receivables

5.1

8.5

478

592

Equity accounted investments and other related party receivables

0.5

0.5

Equity accounted associated companies and other related party receivables

6

116

 

 

 

Total financial trade and other receivables

51.4

73.7

8,560

7,074

Non-financial trade and other receivables

7.4

9.6

865

765

 

 

 

Trade and other receivables

58.8

83.3

9,425

7,839

 

For more information about the credit quality of Statoil's counterparties, see note 5 Financial risk management. For currency sensitivities, see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.

 

16 Cash and cash equivalents

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Cash at bank available

9.2

13.5

591

596

Time deposits

13.2

32.5

1,889

1,660

Money market funds

4.0

3.6

381

65

Interest bearing securities

44.8

30.6

1,092

2,234

Restricted cash, including margin deposits

4.8

2.9

437

535

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

76.0

83.1

4,390

5,090

 

Restricted cash at 31 December 20152017 and 20142016 includes collateral deposits related to trading activities of NOK 3.6 billionUSD 300 million and NOK 2.0 billion,USD 398 million, respectively. Collateral deposits are related to certain requirements set out by exchanges where Statoil is participating. The terms and conditions related to these requirements are determined by the respective exchanges.

 

17 Shareholders' equity and dividends

 

At 31 December 2015 and 2014,2017, Statoil's share capital of NOK 7,971,617,757.508,307,919,632.50 (USD 1,179,542,543) comprised 3,188,647,103 3,323,167,853 shares at a nominal value of NOK 2.50.2.50. Share capital at 31 December 2016 was NOK 8,112,623,527.50 (USD 1,155,993,270) comprised 3,245,049,411 shares at a nominal value of NOK 2.50.

 

Statoil ASA has only one class of shares and all shares have voting rights. The holders of shares are entitled to receive dividends as and when declared and are entitled to one vote per share at general meetings of the company.

 

Dividends declaredA temporary scrip dividend programme was proposed by the board of directors in February 2016, approved by Statoil’s general assembly in May 2016 and paid per share were NOK 1.80reconfirmed by the general assembly in May 2017. The scrip dividend programme was implemented for eachthe quarterly dividends from fourth quarter 2015 to third quarter 2017. Issuance of the first two quarters of 2015. From and includingnew shares related to the third quarter 2017 dividend was completed 22 March 2018. As part of 2015,the scrip dividend is declaredprogramme, eligible shareholders could elect to receive their dividend in USD. Interim dividendsthe form of USD 0.2201 pernew ordinary Statoil shares or in cash. For ADR (American Depository Receipts) holders, dividend could be received in the form of ADSs (American Depository Shares) or in cash. The subscription price for the dividend shares had a discount compared to the volume-weighted average price on OSE of the last two trading days of the subscription period for each quarter. For all quarters, the discount has been set at 5%. As part of the scrip dividend programme, the Norwegian State entered into an agreement where it committed for each quarterly dividend where a scrip option was offered, to receive newly issued shares for a fraction of its shareholdings equal to the average participation among the other shareholders. This to ensure that the State’s ownership share was not impacted by the scrip dividend programme.

During 2017 dividend for the third quarter of 2015 were declared inand for the fourth quarter of 20152016 and have been recogniseddividend for the first and second quarter of 2017 were settled. Dividend declared but not yet settled, is presented as a liabilitydividends payable in the Consolidated financial statements. This amount willbalance sheet, regardless of whether the dividend is expected to be paid in cash or by issuance of new shares. The Consolidated statement of changes in equity shows declared dividend in the first quarter of 2016.period (retained earnings), offset by scrip

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017183


 

The board of directors will propose todividend settled during the annual general meetingperiod (share capital and additional paid-in-capital). Dividend declared in 2017 relate to maintain a dividend of USD 0.2201 per share for the fourth quarter 2015of 2016 and to the introductionfirst three quarters of a two-year scrip dividend programme starting from the fourth quarter 2015. The scrip programme will give shareholders the option to receive quarterly dividends in cash or in newly issued shares in Statoil, at a 5% discount for the fourth quarter 2015.2017.

  

In 2014 dividends of NOK 7.20 were paid and NOK 7.00 for 2013.

 

At 31 December

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Dividends declared

2,891

2,824

USD per share or ADS

0.8804

0.8804

 

 

 

Dividends paid in cash

1,491

1,876

USD per share or ADS

0.8804

0.8804

NOK per share

7.2615

7.3364

 

 

 

Scrip dividends

1,357

904

Number of shares issued (millions)

78.1

56.4

 

 

 

Sum dividends settled

2,848

2,780

 

During 20152017 a total of 4,057,9023,323,671  treasury shares were purchased for NOK 0.6 billionUSD 63 million and 3,203,968 3,219,327 treasury shares were allocated to employees participating in the share saving plan. In 2014During 2016 a total of 3,381,488 4,011,860treasury shares were purchased for NOK 0.6 billionUSD 62 million and 2,960,972 3,882,153 treasury shares were allocated to employees participating in the share saving plan. At 31 December 20152017 Statoil had 11,009,18311,243,234  treasury shares and at 31 December 2014 10,155,249 treasury2016 11,138,890treasury shares, all of which are related to Statoil's share saving plan. For further information, see note 6 Remuneration.Remuneration.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015193


 

18 Finance debt

 

Capital management

The main objectives of Statoil's capital management policy are to maintain a strong financial position and to ensure sufficient financial flexibility. One of the key ratios in the assessment of Statoil's financial robustness is net interest-bearing debt adjusted (ND) to capital employed adjusted (CE).

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Net interest-bearing debt adjusted (ND)

129.9

95.6

16,287

19,389

Capital employed adjusted (CE)

485.0

476.7

56,172

54,490

 

 

 

 

Net debt to capital employed adjusted (ND/CE)

26.8%

20.0%

29.0%

35.6%

 

ND is defined as Statoil's interest bearing financial liabilities less cash and cash equivalents and current financial investments, adjusted for collateral deposits and balances held by Statoil's captive insurance company (an increase of NOK 9.6 billion(amounting to USD 1,014 million and NOK 8.0 billionUSD 1,216 million for 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively), and balances related to the SDFI (a decrease of NOK 1.9 billion(amounting to USD 164 million and NOK 1.6 billionUSD 199 million for 20152017 and 2014, respectively) and project financing exposure that does not correlate to the underlying exposure (unchanged and decrease of NOK 0.1 billion for 2015 and 2014,2016, respectively). CE is defined as Statoil's total equity (including non-controlling interests) and ND.

1842Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

Non-current finance debt

Non-current finance debt

Non-current finance debt

Finance debt measured at amortised cost

Finance debt measured at amortised cost

Finance debt measured at amortised cost

Weighted average interest rates in %1)

Carrying amount in NOK billion at 31 December

Fair value in NOK billion at 31 December2)

Weighted average interest rates in %1)

Carrying amount in USD millions at 31 December

Fair value in USD millions at 31 December2)

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured bonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States Dollar (USD)

 3.51  

 3.50  

 182.9  

 154.4  

 190.5  

 165.0  

3.73

3.54

14,953

19,712

16,106

20,681

Euro (EUR)

 2.28  

 3.99  

 63.4  

 37.6  

 66.0  

 43.8  

2.10

2.10

9,347

8,211

10,057

8,884

Great Britain Pound (GBP)

 6.08  

 6.08  

 18.0  

 15.9  

 23.8  

 22.3  

6.08

6.08

1,859

1,693

2,734

2,475

Norwegian kroner (NOK)

 4.18  

 4.18  

 3.0  

 3.3  

 3.5  

4.18

4.18

366

348

427

386

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 267.3  

 210.9  

 283.7  

 234.7  

 

 

26,524

29,964

29,325

32,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japanese yen (JPY)

 4.30  

 4.30  

 0.7  

 0.6  

 0.8  

 0.9  

4.30

4.30

89

85

118

119

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured bank loans

 

 

 

 

United States Dollar (USD)

 -    

 4.20  

 -    

 0.1  

 -    

 0.1  

Norwegian kroner (NOK)

 3.11  

 3.11  

 0.5  

 0.3  

 0.5  

 0.3  

 

 

 

 

Finance lease liabilities

 

 

 5.1  

 5.4  

 5.0  

 5.6  

 

 

478

507

496

526

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 6.3  

 6.5  

 6.3  

 6.9  

 

 

567

592

614

645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total finance debt

 

 

 273.6  

 217.4  

 289.9  

 241.6  

 

 

27,090

30,556

29,938

33,072

Less current portion

 

 

 9.7  

 12.3  

 9.7  

 12.3  

 

 

2,908

2,557

2,924

2,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current finance debt

 

 

 264.0  

 205.1  

 280.2  

 229.3  

 

 

24,183

27,999

27,014

30,488

 

1)        Weighted average interest rates are calculated based on the contractual rates on the loans per currency at 31 December and do not include the effect of swap agreements.

2)        TheWhere available, the fair value of the non-current financial liabilities is determined using a discounted cash flow model and isfrom quoted market prices, classified at level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are determined from external calculation models based on market observations from various sources, classified at level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Interest rates used in the model are derived from the LIBOR and EURIBOR forward curves and will vary based on the time to maturity for the non-current financial liabilities. The credit premium used is based on indicative pricing from external financial institutions.

 

Unsecured bonds amounting to NOK 182.9 billionUSD 14,953 million are denominated in USD and unsecured bonds amounting to NOK 70.1 billionUSD 8,347 million are swapped into USD. TwoFour bonds denominated in EUR amounting to NOK 14.3 billionUSD 3,224 million are not swapped. The table does not include the effects of

194Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


agreements entered into to swap the various currencies into USD. For further information see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.

Substantially all unsecured bond and unsecured bank loan agreements contain provisions restricting future pledging of assets to secure borrowings without granting a similar secured status to the existing bondholders and lenders.

The secured bank loan in NOK has been secured by real estate and land with a total book value of NOK 0.6 billion.

 

In 2015 Statoil issued the following bonds:

Issuance date

Amount in EUR billion

Interest rate in %

Maturity date

 

 

 

 

17 February 2015

 1.00  

1.625

February 2035

17 February 2015

 1.25  

1.250

February 2027

17 February 2015

 1.00  

0.875

February 2023

17 February 2015

 0.50  

floating

   August 2019

 

 

 

 

Out of Statoil's total outstanding unsecured bond portfolio, 4842 bond agreements contain provisions allowing Statoil to call the debt prior to its final redemption at par or at certain specified premiums if there are changes to the Norwegian tax laws. The carrying amount of these agreements is NOK 264 billionUSD 26,158 million at the 31 December 20152017 closing exchange rate.

In addition to the planned repayment of three bonds at maturity date, Statoil did a buy-back of two outstanding bonds of USD 2,25 billion in 2017. These notes were originally due 8 November 2018 and 15 April 2019.

For more information about the revolving credit facility, maturity profile for undiscounted cash flows and interest rate risk management, see note 5 Financial risk management.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017185


 

Non-current finance debt maturity profile

Non-current finance debt maturity profile

Non-current finance debt maturity profile

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Year 2 and 3

54.9

27.3

3,521

6,478

Year 4 and 5

43.0

44.2

3,041

3,798

After 5 years

166.1

133.5

17,620

17,723

 

 

 

 

Total repayment of non-current finance debt

264.0

205.1

24,183

27,999

 

 

 

 

Weighted average maturity (years)

9

9

9

9

Weighted average annual interest rate (%)

3.39

3.78

3.50

3.41


More information regarding finance lease liabilities is provided in note 22
LeasesLeases.

 

Current finance debt

Current finance debt

Current finance debt

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

Collateral liabilities

10.2

12.9

704

571

Non-current finance debt due within one year

9.7

12.3

2,908

2,557

Other including bank overdraft

0.6

1.3

479

545

 

 

 

 

Total current finance debt

20.5

26.5

4,091

3,674

 

 

 

 

Weighted average interest rate (%)

1.90

2.12

1.65

1.61

 

Collateral liabilities and other current liabilities relate mainly to cash received as security for a portion of Statoil's credit exposure.exposure and outstanding amounts on US Commercial paper (CP) program. Issuance on the CP program amounted to USD 449 million as of 31 December 2017 and USD 500 million as of 31 December 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in USD million)

Non current finance debt

Current finance debt

Financial receivable Collaterals 1)

Additional paid in capital

Share based payment/Treasury shares

Non controlling interest

Dividend payable

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

27,999

3,674

(735)

(212)

27

712

31,465

Transfer to current portion

(351)

351

-

-

-

-

-

Effect of exchange rate changes

1,302

(13)

-

-

-

(11)

1,278

Dividend decleared

-

-

-

-

-

2,891

2,891

Scrip dividend

-

-

-

-

-

(1,357)

(1,357)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

(4,775)

53

464

(62)

(12)

(1,491)

(5,823)

Other changes

8

26

(1)

83

9

(15)

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

24,183

4,091

(272)

(191)

24

729

28,564

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1) Financial receivables collaterals are in included in trade and other receivables in the balance sheet. See note 15 Trade and other receivables.

1862Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


19 Pensions

 

The Norwegian companies in the group are subject to the requirements of the Mandatory Company Pensions Act, and the company'smain pension scheme follows the requirements of the Act.

plans for Statoil ASA and a number of its most significant subsidiaries haveare defined contribution plans. The period's contributionsplans, in which the pension costs are recognised in the Consolidated statement of income asin line with payments of annual pension cost for the period.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015premiums. 195


In 2014 Statoil ASA made a decision to change the company’s mainThe pension plan in Norway from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan. The actual transitioning to the defined contribution plan took place in 2015. At the same time paid-up policies for the rights vested in the defined benefit plan were issued. Employees with less than 15 years of future service before their regular retirement age retained the existing defined benefit plans. For onshore employees between 37 and 51 years of age and offshore employees between 35 and 49 years of age a compensation plan has been established. The defined contribution plan in Norway is managed by an insurance company (Storebrand).

The new pension plans in Statoil ASA also includes certain unfunded elements. elements (notional contribution plans), for which the annual notional contributions are recognised as pension liabilities. These notional contribution planspension liabilities are regulated equal to the return on asset forwithin the main contribution plan and are valued at fair value and recognised as pension liabilities.plan. See note 2 Significant accounting policies for more information about the accounting treatment of the notional contribution plans reported in Statoil ASA.

 

In addition, to the closed pension plans in Statoil ASA some of its subsidiaries havehas a closed defined benefit plans. plan for employees which in 2015 had less than 15 years of future service before their regular retirement age, and for employees in certain subsidiaries. Statoil's defined benefit plans are generally based on a minimum of 30 years of service and 66% of the final salary level, including an assumed benefit from the Norwegian National Insurance Scheme. The Norwegian companies in the group are subject to, and complies with, the requirements of the Norwegian Mandatory Company Pensions Act.

The defined benefit plans in Norway are managed and financed through Statoil Pensjon (Statoil's pension fund - hereafter "Statoil Pension"). Statoil Pension is an independent pension fund that covers the employees in Statoil's Norwegian companies. The purpose of Statoil Pension is to provide retirement and disability pension to members and survivor’s pension to spouses, registered partners, cohabitants and children. The pension fund's assets are kept separate from the company's and group companies' assets. Statoil Pension is supervised by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway ("Finanstilsynet") and is licensed to operate as a pension fund.

The Norwegian National Insurance Scheme ("Folketrygden") provides pension payments (social security) to all retired Norwegian citizens. Such payments are calculated by references to a base amount ("Grunnbeløpet" or "G") annually approved by the Norwegian Parliament. Statoil's plan benefits are generally based on a minimum of 30 years of service and 66% of the final salary level, including an assumed benefit from the Norwegian National Insurance Scheme.

Due to national agreements in Norway, Statoil is a member of both the previousa Norwegian national agreement-based early retirement plan (“AFP”), and the AFP scheme applicable from 1 January 2011. Statoil paid a premium for both AFP schemes until 31 December 2015. After that date, premiums are only due on the latest AFP scheme. The premium in the latest scheme is calculated on the basis of the employees' income between 1 and 7.1 G. The premium is payable for all employees until age 62.62. Pension from the latest AFP scheme will be paid from the AFP plan administrator to employees for their full lifetime. Statoil has determined that its obligations under this multi-employer defined benefit plan can be estimated with sufficient reliability for recognition purposes. Accordingly, the estimated proportionate share of the latest AFP plan has beenis recognised as a defined benefit obligation.

The present values of the defined benefit obligation, except for the notional contribution plan, and the related current service cost and past service cost are measured using the projected unit credit method. The assumptions for salary increases, increases in pension payments and social security base amount are based on agreed regulation in the plans, historical observations, future expectations of the assumptions and the relationship between these assumptions. At 31 December 20152017 the discount rate for the defined benefit plans in Norway was established on the basis of seven years' mortgage covered bonds interest rate extrapolated on a yield curve which matches the duration of Statoil's payment portfolio for earned benefits.

benefits, which was calculated to be 17.2 years at the end of 2017.Social security tax is calculated based on a pension plan's net funded status and is included in the defined benefit obligation.

Statoil has more than one defined benefit plan, but the disclosure is made in total since the plans are not subject to materially different risks. Pension plans outside Norway are not material and as such not disclosed separately. The pension costs in Statoil ASA are partly re-charged to licence partners.

 

Net pension cost

Net pension cost

Net pension cost

 

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current service cost

3.0

4.7

4.0

242

238

378

Interest cost

1.5

3.1

2.5

-

192

191

Interest (income) on plan asset

(1.2)

(2.6)

(2.1)

-

(148)

(145)

Past service cost

(0)

2

-

Losses (gains) from curtailment, settlement or plan amendment

2.0

(1.9)

0.01)

15

109

250

Actuarial (gains) losses related to termination benefits

(0.0)

(0.2)

0.0

(1)

59

(1)

Notional contributions

0.3

0.0

Notional contribution plans

51

50

36

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit plans

5.7

3.2

4.4

308

503

709

 

 

 

Defined contribution plans

1.1

0.2

162

148

135

 

 

Total net pension cost

6.8

3.4

4.6

469

650

844

In addition to the pension cost presented in the table above, financial items related to defined benefit plans are included in the statement of income within Net financial items. Interest cost and changes in fair value of notional assets of USD 201 million, and interest income of USD 138 million has been recognised in 2017.

New entrants for the early retirement plans have been included as a settlement cost. The total impact in 2017 was USD 2 million, USD 123 million in 2016 and USD 173 million in 2015.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017187


(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligations (DBO)

 

 

Defined benefit obligations at 1 January

7,791

6,822

Current service cost

243

239

Interest cost

219

192

Actuarial (gains) losses - Financial assumptions

(26)

879

Actuarial (gains) losses - Experience

(21)

(282)

Benefits paid

(311)

(235)

Losses (gains) from curtailment, settlement or plan amendment

13

171

Paid-up policies

(84)

(131)

Foreign currency translation

411

87

Changes in notional contribution liability

52

50

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligations at 31 December

8,286

7,791

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at 1 January

5,250

5,127

Interest income

148

148

Return on plan assets (excluding interest income)

283

76

Company contributions

39

22

Benefits paid

(196)

(80)

Paid-up policies and personal insurance

(121)

(92)

Foreign currency translation

283

50

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at 31 December

5,687

5,250

 

 

 

Net pension liability at 31 December

(2,599)

(2,541)

 

 

 

Represented by:

 

 

Asset recognised as non-current pension assets (funded plan)

1,306

839

Liability recognised as non-current pension liabilities (unfunded plans)

(3,905)

(3,380)

 

 

 

DBO specified by funded and unfunded pension plans

8,286

7,791

 

 

 

Funded

4,392

4,423

Unfunded

3,894

3,368

 

 

 

Actual return on assets

431

131

The actuarial gain in 2017 is related to changes in financial and demographic assumptions.  Statoil recognised an actuarial loss from changes in financial assumptions in 2016 mainly relate to increased pension liabilities due to reduced interest rates and a higher expected rate of pension increase.

Actuarial losses and gains recognised directly in Other comprehensive income (OCI)

 

 

 

 

 

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial (losses) gains recognised in OCI during the year

331

(482)

1,139

Actuarial (losses) gains related to currency effects on net obligation and foreign exchange translation

(158)

(21)

460

Tax effects of actuarial (losses) gains recognised in OCI

(38)

129

(461)

 

 

 

 

Recognised directly in OCI during the year net of tax

135

(374)

1,138

 

 

 

 

Cumulative actuarial (losses) gains recognised directly in OCI net of tax

(1,053)

(1,188)

(814)

  

1961882   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

1)In 2015 and 2014 Statoil ASA offered early retirement (termination benefits) to a defined group of employees above the age of 58 years. The expenses of NOK 1.4 billion and NOK 1.6 billion respectively were recognised in the Consolidated statement of income. In addition, a plan amendment effect related to the changed pension scheme in Norway resulted in a recognition in the Consolidated statement of income of a loss of NOK 0.6 billion in 2015 and a gain of NOK 3.5 billion in 2014. The plan amendment effect was recalculated in 2015 due to actual transitioning from a defined benefit to a defined contribution plan took place in 2015 and all information was not available when calculating the effect in 2014.

Pension cost includes associated social security tax and is partly charged to partners of Statoil operated licences.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015197


(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligations (DBO)

 

 

Defined benefit obligations at 1 January

65.0

79.4

Current service cost

3.0

4.7

Interest cost

1.5

3.1

Actuarial (gains) losses - Demographic assumptions

0.0

(0.1)

Actuarial (gains) losses - Financial assumptions

(6.0)

4.8

Actuarial (gains) losses - Experience

(3.1)

(2.1)

Benefits paid

(1.9)

(2.0)

Losses (gains) from curtailment, settlement or plan amendment1)

2.2

(2.9)

Paid-up policies

(1.2)

(20.4)

Foreign currency translation

0.3

0.3

Changes in notional contribution liability

0.3

0.0

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligations at 31 December

60.1

65.0

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at 1 January

45.1

62.3

Interest income

1.2

2.6

Return on plan assets (excluding interest income)

0.6

0.9

Company contributions

0.3

0.1

Benefits paid

(0.6)

(0.7)

Paid-up policies and personal insurance

(1.7)

(20.4)

Foreign currency translation

0.3

0.3

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at 31 December

45.2

45.1

 

 

 

Net pension liability at 31 December

(14.9)

(19.9)

 

 

 

Represented by:

 

 

Asset recognised as non-current pension assets (funded plan)

11.3

8.0

Liability recognised as non-current pension liabilities (unfunded plans)

(26.2)

(27.9)

 

 

 

DBO specified by funded and unfunded pension plans

60.1

65.0

 

 

 

Funded

33.9

37.2

Unfunded

26.2

27.9

 

 

 

Actual return on assets

1.8

3.5

Actuarial assumptions

 

Assumptions used to determine benefit costs in %

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations in %

 

 

 

 

2017

2016

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

2.50

2.75

2.50

2.50

Rate of compensation increase

2.25

2.25

2.25

2.25

Expected rate of pension increase

1.75

1.00

1.75

1.75

Expected increase of social security base amount (G-amount)

2.25

2.25

2.25

2.25

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average duration of the defined benefit obligation

 

 

17.2

17.4

 

1)A loss of NOK 0.1 billion in 2015 and a gain of NOK 0.9 billion in 2014, related to the plan amendment, has been recognised against Property, plant and equipment

As part of the change of Statoil ASA’s main pension plan in Norway the estimated assets related to paid-up policies and personal insurance (new disability pension and children pension from 2015) and liabilities related to paid-up policies have been excluded from the amounts in the table above.

Actuarial losses and gains recognised directly in Other comprehensive income (OCI)

 

 

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial (losses) gains recognised in OCI during the year

9.7

0.2

(5.5)

Actuarial (losses) gains related to currency effects on net obligation and foreign exchange translation

0.4

(0.2)

(0.4)

Tax effects of actuarial (losses) gains recognised in OCI

(2.8)

0.9

1.2

 

 

 

 

Recognised directly in OCI during the year net of tax

7.3

0.9

(4.7)

 

 

 

 

Cumulative actuarial (losses) gains recognised directly in OCI net of tax

(7.2)

(14.5)

(15.4)

198Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


The net actuarial gain in 2015 is mainly related to an updated assessment of the discount rate and expected rate of pension increase to be used for pension obligations in Norway.

The line item net actuarial (losses) gains recognised in OCI during the year in 2014 includes actuarial loss charged to partners of Statoil operated licences.

The line item actuarial (losses) gains related to currency effects on net obligation and foreign exchange translation includes the translation of the net pension obligation in NOK to the functional currency USD for the parent company, Statoil ASA, and the translation of the net pension obligation from the functional currency USD to Statoil's presentation currency NOK.

Actuarial assumptions

 

Assumptions used to determine benefit costs in %

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations in %

 

 

 

 

2015

2014

2015

2014

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

2.50

4.00

2.75

2.50

Rate of compensation increase

2.25

3.50

2.25

2.25

Expected rate of pension increase

1.50

2.50

1.00

1.50

Expected increase of social security base amount (G-amount)

2.25

3.25

2.25

2.25

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average duration of the defined benefit obligation

 

 

17.1

19.1

The assumptions presented are for the Norwegian companies in Statoil which are members of Statoil's pension fund. The defined benefit plans of other subsidiaries are immaterial to the consolidated pension assets and liabilities.

Expected attrition at 31 December 20152017 was 0.4%0.2% and 0.1%2.2% for employees between 50-59 years and 60-67 years, respectively. Expected attrition at 31 December 2014 was 2.1%, 2.2%, 1.3%, 0.5% and 0.2% for the employees under 30 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years0.4% and 60-67 years, respectively.0.1% in 2016.

For population in Norway, the mortality table K2013, issued by The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, is used as the best mortality estimate.

Disability tables for plans in Norway developed by the actuary were implemented in 2013 and represent the best estimate to use for plans in Norway.

Sensitivity analysis

The table below presents an estimate of the potential effects of changes in the key assumptions for the defined benefit plans. The following estimates are based on facts and circumstances as of 31 December 2015. Actual results may materially deviate from these estimates.2017.

 

 

Discount rate

Expected rate of compensation increase

Expected rate of pension increase

Mortality assumption

(in NOK billion)

0.50%

-0.50%

0.50%

-0.50%

0.50%

-0.50%

+ 1 year

- 1 year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation at 31 December 2015

(4.3)

5.0

1.1

(1.0)

3.5

(3.1)

2.0

(2.2)

Service cost 2016

(0.2)

0.2

0.1

(0.0)

0.1

(0.1)

0.1

(0.1)

 

Discount rate

Expected rate of compensation increase

Expected rate of pension increase

Mortality assumption

(in USD million)

0.50%

-0.50%

0.50%

-0.50%

0.50%

-0.50%

+ 1 year

- 1 year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation at 31 December 2017

(607)

689

88

(92)

527

(583)

295

(323)

Service cost 2018

(22)

25

8

(8)

21

(19)

8

(11)

 

The sensitivity of the financial results to each of the key assumptions has been estimated based on the assumption that all other factors would remain unchanged. The estimated effects on the financial result would differ from those that would actually appear in the Consolidated financial statements because the Consolidated financial statements would also reflect the relationship between these assumptions.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    199189


 

Pension assets

The plan assets related to the defined benefit plans were measured at fair value. Statoil Pension invests in both financial assets and real estate.

Real estate properties owned by Statoil Pension amounted to NOK 3.4 billionUSD 447 million and NOK 3.2 billionUSD 402 million of total pension assets at 31 December 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively, and are rented to Statoil companies.

The table below presents the portfolio weighting as approved by the board of Statoil Pension for 2015.2017. The portfolio weight during a year will depend on the risk capacity.

 

Pension assets on investments classes

Pension assets on investments classes

Target portfolio weight

Pension assets on investments classes

Target portfolio weight

(in %)

2015

2014

2017

2016

 

 

Equity securities

38.3

40.1

31 - 43

37.5

39.0

31 - 43

Bonds

40.3

38.7

36 - 48

41.7

41.1

36 - 48

Money market instruments

14.9

13.4

0 - 29

14.3

13.9

0 - 29

Real estate

5.0

4.8

 5 - 10

6.1

5.4

 5 - 10

Other assets

1.5

3.0

 

0.4

0.6

 

 

 

Total

100.0

 

100.0

 

 

In 2015 100%2017 92% of the equity securities, 38%32% of bonds and 100%67% of money market instruments had quoted market prices in an active market (level 1). In 2014 100%8% of the equity securities, 38%68% of bonds and 86%32% of money market instruments had market prices based on inputs other than quoted prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are determined from external calculation models based on market observations from various sources, classified at level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

In 2016 98% of the equity securities, 30% of bonds and 71% of money market instruments had quoted market prices in an active market. Statoil does not have any0% of the equity securities, 70% of bonds orand 28% of money market instruments classified in level 3. Real Estate is classified as level 3. had market prices based on inputs other than quoted prices (level 2).

For definition of the various levels, see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk.

No company contribution isCompany contributions expected to be paidmade to Statoil Pension in 2016.2018 are not considered significant.

 

20 Provisions

 

(in NOK billion)

Asset retirement obligations

Claims and litigations

Other

provisions

Total

(in USD million)

Asset retirement obligations

Claims and litigations

Other

provisions

Total

 

 

 

 

Non-current portion at 31 December 2014

107.4

3.5

6.3

117.2

Current portion at 31 December 2014 reported as trade and other payables

1.4

13.6

2.1

17.0

Non-current portion at 31 December 2016

10,711

1,209

1,487

13,406

Current portion at 31 December 2016 reported as trade and other payables

188

1,147

922

2,258

 

 

 

 

Provisions at 31 December 2014

108.8

17.1

8.4

134.2

Provisions at 31 December 2016

10,899

2,356

2,409

15,664

 

 

 

 

New or increased provisions

4.2

6.1

4.4

14.8

768

128

833

1,729

Decrease in the estimates

(16.2)

(2.2)

(3.3)

(21.7)

(388)

(1,120)

(272)

(1,780)

Amounts charged against provisions

(2.2)

(4.6)

(0.9)

(7.7)

(222)

(22)

(579)

(824)

Effects of change in the discount rate

(6.8)

0.0

(0.1)

(7.0)

543

-

(6)

538

Reduction due to divestments

(1.0)

0.0

(0.1)

(1.1)

(2)

-

(2)

Accretion expenses

3.9

0.0

3.9

413

-

413

Reclassification and transfer

(0.6)

0.0

(0.3)

(0.8)

-

-

16

Currency translation

4.8

2.7

0.9

8.4

441

(2)

49

487

 

 

 

 

Provisions at 31 December 2015

95.0

19.1

9.0

123.0

Provisions at 31 December 2017

12,451

1,339

2,451

16,241

 

 

 

 

Current portion at 31 December 2015 reported as trade and other payables

1.3

9.2

2.8

13.4

Long term interest bearing provisions at 31 December 2015 reported as finance debt

0.0

0.0

0.2

Non-current portion at 31 December 2015

93.7

9.8

6.0

109.4

Current portion at 31 December 2017 reported as trade and other payables

69

68

547

684

Non-current portion at 31 December 2017

12,383

1,271

1,904

15,557

2001902   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Expected timing of cash outflows

(in NOK billion)

Asset retirement obligations

Other

provisions, including claims and litigations

Total

 

 

 

 

2016 - 2020

12.2

24.7

36.9

2021 - 2025

16.9

0.8

17.7

2026 - 2030

16.1

0.2

16.3

2031 - 2035

25.5

0.7

26.3

Thereafter

24.2

1.6

25.8

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

95.0

28.1

123.0

Expected timing of cash outflows

(in USD million)

Asset retirement obligations

Other

provisions, including claims and litigations

Total

 

 

 

 

2018 - 2022

993

3,082

4,076

2023 - 2027

2,413

342

2,755

2028 - 2032

986

25

1,011

2033 - 2037

4,368

16

4,384

Thereafter

3,691

324

4,015

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

12,451

3,790

16,241

 

Statoil’s estimated asset retirement obligations (ARO) have reduced mainly due to a reduction in cost estimates for plugging and abandonment. Changes in ARO are reflected within Property, plant and equipment and Provisions in the Consolidated balance sheet. The timing of cash outflows related to ARO primarily depends on when the production ceases at the various facilities.

The claims and litigations category mainly relates to expected payments on unresolved claims. The timing and amounts of potential settlements in respect of these are uncertain and dependent on various factors that are outside management's control.

See also commentsThe main change in the caption claims and litigations concerns a settlement of a dispute with the Angolan Ministry of Finance. For further information on provisions inthis dispute and other contingent liabilities, see note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.assets.

The other provisions category relates to expected payments on onerous contracts, cancellation fees and other. In 2016, Statoil recognised a provision amounting to USD 1 billion for a contingent consideration related to the BM-S-8 acquisition in Brazil. In 2017, provisions related to the BM-S-8 acquisition increased to USD 1.2 billion of which USD 0.3 billion is current portion. For further information, see note 4 Acquisitions and divestments.

For further information of methods applied and estimates required, see note 2 Significant accounting policiespolicies.

 

21 Trade, and other payables and provisions

 

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Trade payables

18.1

21.8

3,181

2,358

Non-trade payables and accrued expenses

20.8

25.2

2,345

1,623

Joint venture payables

22.8

28.9

2,464

2,632

Equity accounted investments and other related party payables

5.5

6.6

Equity accounted associated companies and other related party payables

858

620

 

 

 

Total financial trade and other payables

67.2

82.5

8,849

7,233

Current portion of provisions and other payables

15.0

18.1

Current portion of provisions and other non-financial payables

888

2,433

 

 

 

Trade and other payables

82.2

100.7

Trade, other payables and provisions

9,737

9,666

 

Included in current portion of provisions and other non-financial payables are certain provisions that are further described in note 20 Provisions and in note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets. For information regarding currency sensitivities, see note 25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk. For further information on payables to equity accounted investmentsassociated companies and other related parties, see note 24 Related parties.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    201191


 

22 Leases

 

Statoil leases certain assets, notably drilling rigs, vessels and office buildings.Lease contracts committed by a licence are presented net, based on Statoil’s participation interest in the respective licences. Lease contracts for helicopters, supply vessels and other assets used to serve a group of licences are presented net based on Statoil’s average participation interests in these licences.

In 2015,2017, net rental expenditures were NOK 27.7 billion (NOK 22.9 billionUSD 2,075 million (USD 2,569 million in 20142016 and NOK 17.4 billionUSD 3,439 million in 2013)2015) consisting of minimum lease payments of NOK 32.6 billion (NOK 28.4 billionUSD 2,333 million (USD 3,113 million in 20142016 and NOK 21.2 billionUSD 4046 million in 2013)2015) reduced with sublease payments received of NOK 4.9 billion (NOK 5.5 billionUSD 272 million (USD 558 million in 20142016 and NOK 3.8 billionUSD 608 million in 2013)2015). Net rental expenditures in 2015 includeThere are no significant rig cancellation payments of NOK 1.6 billion. fees expensed in 2017 (USD 115 million in 2016). No material contingent rent payments have been expensed in 2015, 20142017, 2016 or 2013.2015.

The information in the table below shows future minimum lease payments due and receivable under non-cancellable operating leases at 31 December 2015:2017:

 

Operating leases

Operating leases

(in NOK billion)

Rigs

Vessels

Other

Total

Sublease

Net total

(in USD million)

Rigs

Vessels

Land and buildings

Other

Total

Sublease

Net total

 

 

 

 

 

2016

18.2

5.0

2.4

25.6

(2.6)

23.0

2017

11.1

3.8

1.8

16.7

(0.9)

15.8

2018

7.3

3.2

1.6

12.1

(0.7)

11.3

1,039

615

155

152

1,961

(125)

1,837

2019

6.1

2.5

1.3

9.9

(0.7)

9.2

712

393

140

113

1,359

(105)

1,253

2020

4.2

2.2

1.3

7.8

(0.7)

7.0

509

382

136

92

1,119

(104)

1,015

2021

374

304

133

60

872

(68)

804

2022

352

233

134

57

777

(22)

755

2023-2027

287

498

621

47

1,453

(61)

1,392

2028-2032

-

93

369

23

485

(0)

485

Thereafter

9.0

6.6

12.2

27.8

(1.4)

26.4

-

13

50

13

76

-

76

 

 

 

 

 

Total future minimum lease payments

55.9

23.3

20.6

99.8

(7.1)

92.7

3,274

2,532

1,737

558

8,101

(484)

7,617

 

Statoil had certain operating lease contracts for drilling rigs at 31 December 2015.2017. The remaining significant contracts' terms range from one month to eightsix years. Certain contracts contain renewal options. Rig lease agreements are for the most part based on fixed day rates. Certain rigs have been subleased in whole or for part of the lease term mainly to Statoil operated licenseslicences on the Norwegian continental shelf. These leases are shown gross as operating leases in the table above.

Statoil has a long-term time charter agreement with Teekay for offshore loading and transportation in the North Sea. The contract covers the lifetime of applicable producing fields and at year end 20152017 includes three crude tankers. The contract's estimated nominal amount was approximately NOK 7.0 billionUSD 585 million at year end 2015,2017, and it is included in the category vessels in the table above.

The category otherland and buildings includes future minimum lease payments to related parties of NOK 4.3 billionUSD 511 million regarding the lease of one office building located in Bergen and one in Harstad, both owned by Statoil`s pension fund (“Statoil Pension”). These operating lease commitments extend to the year 2034. NOK 3.2 billion2034. USD 387 million of the total is payable after 2020.2021. 

Statoil had finance lease liabilities of NOK 4.9 billionUSD 478 million at 31 December 2015.2017. The nominal minimum lease payments related to these finance leases amount to NOK 6.5 billion.USD 630 million. Property, plant and equipment  includes NOK 6.8 billionUSD 439 million for finance leases that have been capitalised at year end (NOK 5.7 billion(USD 484 million in 2014)2016), mainly presented in the category machinery, equipment and transportation equipment, including vessels in note 1110 Property, plant and equipment.

 

Certain contracts contain renewal options. The execution of such options will depend on future market development and business needs at the time when such options are to be exercised.

23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets

 

Contractual commitments

Statoil had contractual commitments of NOK 62.3 billionUSD 6,012 million at 31 December 2015.2017. The contractual commitments reflect Statoil's share and mainly comprise construction and acquisition of property, plant and equipment.equipment as well as committed investments in equity accounted entities.

 

As a condition for being awarded oil and gas exploration and production licences, participants may be committed to drill a certain number of wells. At the end of 2015,2017, Statoil was committed to participate in 32 offshore29 wells, with an average ownership interest of approximately 33%49%. Statoil's share of estimated expenditures to drill these wells amounts to NOK 7.7 billion.USD 456 million. Additional wells that Statoil may become committed to participating in depending on future discoveries in certain licences are not included in these numbers.

Other long-term commitments

1922Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Statoil has entered into various long-term agreements for pipeline transportation as well as terminal use, processing, storage and entry/exit capacity commitments and commitments related to specific purchase agreements. The agreements ensure the rights to the capacity or volumes in question, but also impose on Statoil the obligation to pay for the agreed-upon service or commodity, irrespective of actual use. The contracts' terms vary, with durations of up to 30 years.2045.

Take-or-pay contracts for the purchase of commodity quantities are only included in the table below if their contractually agreed pricing is of a nature that will or may deviate from the obtainable market prices for the commodity at the time of delivery.

202Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Obligations payable by Statoil to entities accounted for as associates and joint venturesusing the equity method are included gross in the table below. ObligationsFor assets (for example pipelines) that Statoil accounts for by recognising its share of assets, liabilities, income and expenses (capacity costs) on a line-by-line basis in the Consolidated financial statements, the amounts in the table include the net commitment payable by Statoil to entities accounted for as joint operations (for example pipelines) are included net (i.e. gross commitment less Statoil’sStatoil's ownership share).

Nominal minimum other long-term commitments at 31 December 2015:2017:

 

(in NOK billion)

 

(in USD million)

 

 

 

2016

13.5

2017

12.8

2018

11.8

1,548

2019

12.2

1,415

2020

10.9

1,312

2021

1,101

2022

942

Thereafter

77.9

5,563

 

 

Total

139.1

11,881

 

OfGuarantees

Statoil has guaranteed for its proportionate portion of an associate’s long-term bank debt, amounting to USD 305 million. The book value of the reported other long-term commitments, NOK 17.5 billion relates to pipeline commitments where the construction of these pipelinesguarantee is pending governmental approvalimmaterial..

 

Contingent liabilities and contingent assets

DuringResolution of the annual auditsdispute with the Angolan Ministry of Statoil'sFinance

In June 2017 Statoil signed an agreement with the Angolan Ministry of Finance which resolved the dispute over previously assessed additional profit oil and taxes due, and established how to allocate profit oil and assess petroleum income tax (PIT) related to Statoil’s participation in Block 4, Block 15, Block 17 and Block 31 offshore Angola the Angolan Ministry of Finance has assessed additional profit oil and taxes due on the basis of activities that currently includefor the years 2002 up to and including 2012. Statoil disputes the assessments and is pursuing these matters in2016.  In accordance with relevant Angolan legalthe agreement, Statoil in July 2017 paid in full and administrative procedures. Onfinal settlement an additional PIT amount to Angola related to the basis of the assessments and continued activity on the four blocks upprior reporting periods. The agreement also led to and including 2015, the exposurea certain increase in Norwegian taxes payable. In addition to taxes previously provided for Statoil at year end 2015 is estimated to NOK 11.6 billion (USD 1.3 billion), the most significant part of which relates to profit oil elements. Statoil has provided in the Consolidated financial statements for its best estimate related to the assessments,dispute, the current income tax expense at the time reflected USD 117 million payable in Angola and Norway. Based on the agreement, profit oil and interest expense amounts previously provided for in the current portion of provisions related to claims and litigation were reversed. USD 754 million has been reflected as revenue in the E&P International segment, while USD 319 million has been reflected as interest expense reduction under Net financial items in the Consolidated statement of income. The net effect of the dispute resolution recognised in the Consolidated statement of income mainly as a revenue reduction, with additional amounts reflected as interest expenses and tax expenses, respectively.consequently was USD 956 million.

Redetermination process for Agbami field

Through its ownership in OML 128 in Nigeria, Statoil is party to an ownership interest redetermination process for the Agbami field. In October 2015, Statoil received the Expert’s final ruling which implies a reduction of 5.17 percentage points in Statoil’s equity interest in the field. Statoil had previously initiated arbitration proceedings to set aside interim decisions made by the Expert, but this was declined by the arbitration tribunal in its November 2015 judgment. Statoil has initiated proceedings before the Federal High Court in Lagosproceeded to set asidecourt of Appeal to have the arbitration award andset aside. In October 2016 Statoil also intends to initiateinitiated a new arbitration to set aside the Expert’s final ruling. Currently Statoil has two distinct, but connected, legal processes ongoing related to the Agbami redetermination. As of 31 December 2015, 2017, Statoil has recognised a provision of NOK 9.5 billion (USD 1.1 billion),USD 1,165 million net of tax, which reflects a reduction of 5.17 percentage points in Statoil’s equity interest in the Agbami field. The provision is reflected within Provisions in the Consolidated balance sheet.

Price review arbitration

Some long-term gas sales agreements contain price review clauses. Certain counterparties have requested arbitrationclauses, which in connection with price review claims.certain cases lead to claims subject to arbitration. The related exposure for Statoil related to arbitration has been estimated to an amount equivalent to approximately NOK 3.6 billionUSD 343 million for gas delivered prior to year end 2015.2017. Statoil has provided for its best estimate related to these contractual gas price disputes in the Consolidated financial statements, with the impact to the Consolidated statement of income reflected as revenue adjustments.

 

Dispute concerning interpretation of the terms of the OML 128 Production Sharing Contract (PSC)

There is a dispute between the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and the partners (Contractor) in Oil Mining Lease (OML) 128 of the unitised Agbami field concerning interpretation of the terms of the OML 128 Production Sharing Contract (PSC). The dispute relates to the allocation between NNPC and Contractor of cost oil, tax oil and profit oil volumes. NNPC has claimed that sinceFollowing an arbitration process on the start of production from Agbami, Contractor has lifted excess volumes comparedmatter concluded in 2015, various disputes related to the PSC terms,legality and consequently NNPC has increased its lifting of oil. The Contractor disputed NNPC's position and initiated arbitration in the matter in accordance with the termsenforcement of the PSC. In 2015 the Arbitral Tribunal ruledarbitration verdict in Contractor’s favour of Contractor’s interpretation of the PSC on the main points. The Contractor isare currently proceeding to enforce the favourable decision by the means availablein process in the Nigerian legal system, while NNPC on its hand has initiated litigation concerning certain objections to the arbitration award. The Nigerian Federal Inland Revenue Service is also contesting the legality of the arbitration process as far as resolving tax related disputes goes, and is actively pursuing this view through the channels of the Nigerian legalcourt system.   Statoil’s

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017193


stake in the dispute at year end 2015 is2017 mainly relatedrelates to claims for return of certain oil volumes previously lifted by NNPC during the arbitration process and in subsequent years contrary to the PSC terms. NNPC has so far kept on its overlifting contrary to the award. Following the arbitration award, Statoil’s previous provision related to NNPC’s claim has been reversed with the effect mainly reflected as revenue in the Consolidated statement of income.

 

In 2014, followingDispute with Brazilian tax authorities

Brazilian tax authorities have issued an updated tax assessment for 2011 for Statoil’s Brazilian subsidiary which was party to Statoil’s divestment of 40% of the Peregrino field to Sinochem at that time. The assessment disputes Statoil’s allocation of the sale proceeds between entities and assets involved, resulting in a regular reviewsignificantly higher assessed taxable gain and related taxes payable in Brazil. Statoil disagrees with the assessment, and has provided responses to this effect. The ongoing process of Statoil’s 2012 Consolidated financial statements,formal communication with the Financial Supervisory AuthorityBrazilian tax authorities, as well as any subsequent litigation that may become necessary, may take several years. No taxes will become payable until the matter has been finally settled. Statoil is of Norway (the FSA) ordered Statoil to: ” Change its future accounting practices for redetermination of CGUs containing onerous contracts. Correct the described error by establishing a separate onerous contract provision for the Cove Point capacity contract in a financial period prior to Q1 2013. The correction shall be presentedview that all applicable tax regulations have been applied in the next periodic financial report. Information aboutcase and that the circumstances shall be given in notes to the accounts.” Statoil appealed the order andgroup has been granted a stay in carrying out the FSA’s order pending the final outcome of the appeal. The appeal is currently being assessed by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance and not yet concluded. If the outcome of the appeal would require implementing the FSA’s order, a provision would be recognised against Net operating income in an earlier reporting period than 2013. As the contracts were fullystrong position. No amounts have consequently been provided for in 2013, there would be no impact on equity at 31 December 2013 or thereafter.the accounts.

Suit for an annulment of Petrobras’ sale of the interest in BM-S-8 to Statoil

In April 2017, a federal judge granted an injunction request to suspend the assignment to Statoil of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.’s (“Petrobras”) 66% operated interest in the Brazilian offshore licence BM-S-8, in a class action suit filed by the Union of Workers of Oil Tankers of Sergipe (Sindipetro) against Petrobras, Statoil, and ANP - the Brazilian Regulatory Agency (“the defendants”). The actual amountsuit seeks the annulment of Petrobras’ sale of the interest in BM-S-8 to be providedStatoil, which was closed in an earlier period would depend onNovember 2016. The injunction was subsequently lifted by the periodFederal Regional Court. This decision is appealable. At the end of 2017 the acquired interest remains in whichStatoil’s balance sheet as intangible assets of the provision would be recorded. The FSA order does not specify which period priorExploration & Production International (E&P International) segment. For further information about Statoil’s acquisitions and divestments in BM-S-8, reference is made to the first quarter 2013 would be relevant2017 Consolidated annual financial statements note 4 Acquisitions and divestments.

A deviation notice from Norwegian tax authorities

On 6 July 2016, the Norwegian tax authorities issued a deviation notice for the provisionyears 2012 to be recognised. Statoil’s reading2014 related to the internal pricing on certain transactions between Statoil Coordination Centre (SCC) in Belgium and Norwegian entities in the Statoil group. The main issue in this matter relates to SCC`s capital structure and its compliance with the arm’s length principle. Statoil is of the view that 2011 would be most relevant.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015203


There would bearm’s length pricing has been applied and that the group has a strong position, and no impact onamounts have consequently been provided for this issue in the 2015 and 2014 financial statements, however, the comparative amounts included therein for 2013 Net operating income and Net income would be NOK 5.6 billion and NOK 5.0 billion higher, respectively.accounts.

 

Other claims

During the normal course of its business, Statoil is involved in legal proceedings, and several other unresolved claims are currently outstanding. The ultimate liability or asset, in respect of such litigation and claims cannot be determined at this time. Statoil has provided in its Consolidated financial statements for probable liabilities related to litigation and claims based on its best estimate. Statoil does not expect that its financial position, results of operations or cash flows will be materially affected by the resolution of these legal proceedings.

Statoil is actively pursuing the above disputes through the contractual and legal means available in each case, but the timing of the ultimate resolutions and related cash flows, if any, cannot at present be determined with sufficient reliability.

Provisions related to claims are reflected within note 20 Provisions.Provisions.

 

24 Related parties

 

Transactions with the Norwegian State

The Norwegian State is the majority shareholder of Statoil and also holds major investments in other Norwegian companies. As of 31 December 20152017, the Norwegian State had an ownership interest in Statoil of 67.0%67.0% (excluding Folketrygdfondet, the Norwegian national insurance fund, of 3.2%3.3%). This ownership structure means that Statoil participates in transactions with many parties that are under a common ownership structure and therefore meet the definition of a related party. All transactions are considered to be on an arm's length basis.

Total purchases of oil and natural gas liquids from the Norwegian State amounted to NOK 60.0 billion, NOK 86.4 billionUSD 7,352 million, USD 5,848 million and NOK 92.5 billionUSD 7,431 million in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Total purchases of natural gas regarding the Tjeldbergodden methanol plant from the Norwegian State amounted to NOK 0.6 billion, NOK 0.5 billionUSD 39 million, USD 44 million and NOK 0.5 billionUSD 68 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively. These purchases of oil and 2013, respectively.natural gas are recorded in Statoil ASA. In addition, Statoil ASA sells in its own name, but for the Norwegian State’s account and risk, the Norwegian State’s gas production. These transactions are presented net. For further information please see note 2 Significant accounting policies. The most significant items included in the line item equity accounted investments and other related party payables in note 21 Trade and other payables, are amounts payable to the Norwegian State for these purchases.

Other transactions

In relation to its ordinary business operations Statoil enters into contracts such as pipeline transport, gas storage and processing of petroleum products, with companies in which Statoil has ownership interests. Such transactions are carried out on an arm's length basis and are included within the applicable captions in the Consolidated statement of income. Gassled and certain other infrastructure assets are operated by Gassco AS, which is an entity under common control by the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. Gassco’s activities are performed on behalf of and for the risk and reward of pipeline and terminal owners, and capacity payments flow through Gassco to the respective owners. Statoil payments that flowed through Gassco in this respect amounted to NOK 7.2 billion, NOK 7.4 billionUSD 1,155 million, USD 1,167 million and NOK 7.3 billionUSD 1,105 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively. These payments are recorded in Statoil ASA. In addition, Statoil ASA process in its own name, but for the Norwegian State’s account and 2013,risk, the Norwegian State’s share of the Gassco costs. These transactions are presented net.

1942Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


As of 31 December 2017, Statoil had an ownership interest in Lundin Petroleum AB (Lundin) of 20.1% of the outstanding shares and votes. Total purchase of oil and related products from Lundin amounted to USD 176 million and USD 155 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The purchase of oil and related products is recorded in Statoil ASA.

For information concerning certain lease arrangements with Statoil Pension, see note 22 Leases.

Related party transactions with management are presented in note 6 Remuneration.Remuneration.  Management remuneration for 20152017 is presented in note 54 Remuneration  in the financial statements of the parent company, Statoil ASA.

204Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

25 Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk

 

Financial instruments by category

The following tables present Statoil's classes of financial instruments and their carrying amounts by the categories as they are defined in IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.Measurement. All financial instruments' carrying amounts are measured at fair value or their carrying amounts reasonably approximate fair value except non-current financial liabilities.  See note 18 Financedebt  for fair value information of non-current bonds, bank loans and finance lease liabilities.

See note 2 Significant accounting policiesfor further information regarding measurement of fair values.

 

 

 

 

Fair value through profit or loss

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value through profit or loss

 

(in NOK billion)

Note

Loans and receivables

Available for sale

Held for trading

Fair value option

Non-financial assets

Total carrying amount

(in USD million)

Note

Loans and receivables

Available for sale

Held for trading

Fair value option

Non-financial assets

Total carrying amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

23.8

0.0

0.0

23.8

   

-

1,603

-

-

1,603

Non-current financial investments

13

0.0

1.8

0.0

18.7

0.0

20.6

13

47

397

-

2,397

-

2,841

Prepayments and financial receivables

13

5.8

0.0

0.0

2.8

8.5

13

723

-

188

912

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and other receivables

15

51.4

0.0

0.0

7.4

58.8

15

8,560

-

865

9,425

Current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

4.8

0.0

0.0

4.8

   

-

159

-

-

159

Current financial investments

13

19.1

0.0

61.4

6.0

0.0

86.5

13

4,085

-

3,649

714

-

8,448

Cash and cash equivalents

16

27.1

0.0

48.8

0.0

0.0

76.0

16

2,917

-

1,473

-

-

4,390

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

103.4

1.9

138.8

24.7

10.1

278.8

 

16,332

397

6,884

3,112

1,053

27,778

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value through profit or loss

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value through profit or loss

 

(in NOK billion)

Note

Loans and receivables

Available for sale

Held for trading

Fair value option

Non-financial assets

Total carrying amount

(in USD million)

Note

Loans and receivables

Available for sale

Held for trading

Fair value option

Non-financial assets

Total carrying amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

29.9

0.0

0.0

29.9

   

-

1,819

-

-

1,819

Non-current financial investments

13

0.0

1.4

0.0

18.2

0.0

19.6

13

-

207

-

2,137

-

2,344

Prepayments and financial receivables

13

2.7

0.0

0.0

2.9

5.7

13

707

-

185

893

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and other receivables

15

73.7

0.0

0.0

9.6

83.3

15

7,074

-

765

7,839

Current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

5.3

0.0

0.0

5.3

   

-

492

-

-

492

Current financial investments

13

9.8

0.0

43.4

6.0

0.0

59.2

13

3,217

-

4,176

818

-

8,211

Cash and cash equivalents

16

48.9

0.0

34.2

0.0

0.0

83.1

16

2,791

-

2,299

-

-

5,090

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

135.2

1.4

112.8

24.2

12.6

286.2

 

13,789

207

8,785

2,955

950

26,687

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    205195


 

(in NOK billion)

Note

Amortised cost

Fair value through profit or loss

Non-financial liabilities

Total carrying amount

(in USD million)

Note

Amortised cost

Fair value through profit or loss

Non-financial liabilities

Total carrying amount

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

At 31 December 2017

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

Non-current finance debt

18

264.0

0.0

264.0

18

24,183

-

24,183

Non-current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

11.3

0.0

11.3

   

-

900

-

900

 

 

 

 

Trade and other payables

21

66.8

0.0

15.4

82.2

21

8,849

-

888

9,737

Current finance debt

18

20.5

0.0

20.5

18

4,091

-

4,091

Dividend payable

 

6.2

0.0

6.2

 

729

-

729

Current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

2.3

0.0

2.3

   

-

403

-

403

 

 

 

 

Total

 

357.5

13.6

15.4

386.5

 

37,851

1,302

888

40,042

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

Note

Amortised cost

Fair value through profit or loss

Non-financial liabilities

Total carrying amount

(in USD million)

Note

Amortised cost

Fair value through profit or loss

Non-financial liabilities

Total carrying amount

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

At 31 December 2016

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

Non-current finance debt

18

205.1

0.0

205.1

18

27,999

-

27,999

Non-current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

4.5

0.0

4.5

   

-

1,420

-

1,420

 

 

 

 

Trade and other payables

21

82.5

0.0

18.1

100.7

21

7,233

-

2,433

9,666

Current finance debt

18

26.5

0.0

26.5

18

3,674

-

3,674

Dividend payable

 

5.7

0.0

5.7

 

712

-

712

Current derivative financial instruments

   

0.0

6.6

0.0

6.6

   

-

508

-

508

 

 

 

 

Total

 

319.8

11.1

18.1

349.1

 

39,618

1,928

2,433

43,979

 

Fair value hierarchy

The following table summarises each class of financial instruments which are recognised in the Consolidated balance sheet at fair value, split by Statoil's basis for fair value measurement.

 

(in NOK billion)

Non-current financial investments

Non-current derivative financial instruments - assets

Current financial investments

Current derivative financial instruments - assets

Cash equivalents

Non-current derivative financial instruments - liabilities

Current derivative financial instruments - liabilities

Net fair value

(in USD million)

Non-current financial investments

Non-current derivative financial instruments - assets

Current financial investments

Current derivative financial instruments - assets

Cash equivalents

Non-current derivative financial instruments - liabilities

Current derivative financial instruments - liabilities

Net fair value

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

At 31 December 2017

 

Level 1

10.5

0.0

4.8

0.0

15.3

1,126

-

355

-

1,481

Level 2

8.2

15.5

62.6

4.3

48.8

(10.8)

(2.3)

126.3

1,271

1,320

4,008

122

1,473

(900)

(399)

6,896

Level 3

1.8

8.3

0.0

0.4

0.0

(0.5)

0.0

10.1

397

283

-

37

-

(4)

713

 

 

Total fair value

20.6

23.8

67.4

4.8

48.8

(11.3)

(2.3)

151.7

2,794

1,603

4,363

159

1,473

(900)

(403)

9,090

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

At 31 December 2016

 

Level 1

11.1

0.0

4.0

0.0

15.1

1,095

-

516

-

1,611

Level 2

7.0

17.2

45.5

4.7

34.2

(4.5)

(6.6)

97.4

1,042

970

4,479

426

2,299

(1,414)

(503)

7,299

Level 3

1.4

12.7

0.0

0.6

0.0

(0.0)

14.7

207

848

(0)

66

-

(6)

(4)

1,110

 

 

Total fair value

19.6

29.9

49.4

5.3

34.2

(4.5)

(6.6)

127.3

2,344

1,819

4,994

492

2,299

(1,420)

(508)

10,019

 

Level 1, fair value based on prices quoted in an active market for identical assets or liabilities, includes financial instruments actively traded and for which the values recognised in the Consolidated balance sheet are determined based on observable prices on identical instruments. For Statoil this category will, in most cases, only be relevant for investments in listed equity securities and government bonds.

1962Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Level 2, fair value based on inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1, which are derived from observable market transactions, includes Statoil's non-standardised contracts for which fair values are determined on the basis of price inputs from observable market

206Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


transactions. This will typically be when Statoil uses forward prices on crude oil, natural gas, interest rates and foreign exchange rates as inputs to the valuation models to determining the fair value of its derivative financial instruments.

Level 3, fair value based on unobservable inputs, includes financial instruments for which fair values are determined on the basis of input and assumptions that are not from observable market transactions. The fair values presented in this category are mainly based on internal assumptions. The internal assumptions are only used in the absence of quoted prices from an active market or other observable price inputs for the financial instruments subject to the valuation.

The fair value of certain earn-out agreements and embedded derivative contracts are determined by the use of valuation techniques with price inputs from observable market transactions as well as internally generated price assumptions and volume profiles. The discount rate used in the valuation is a risk-free rate based on the applicable currency and time horizon of the underlying cash flows adjusted for a credit premium to reflect either Statoil's credit premium, if the value is a liability, or an estimated counterparty credit premium if the value is an asset. In addition a risk premium for risk elements not adjusted for in the cash flow may be included when applicable. The fair values of these derivative financial instruments have been classified in their entirety in the third category within current derivative financial instruments and non-current derivative financial instruments - assets in the table above.instruments. Another reasonable assumption, that could have been applied when determining the fair value of these contracts, would be to extrapolate the last observed forward prices with inflation. If Statoil had appliedApplying this assumption would have an insignificant impact on the fair value of the contracts included would have decreased by approximately NOK 4.6 billion at end of 2015 and decreased by NOK 3.5 billion at end of 2014 and impacted the Consolidated statement of income with corresponding amounts.for these contracts.

The reconciliation of the changes in fair value during 20152017 and 20142016 for all financial assetsinstruments classified in the third level in the hierarchy are presented in the following table.

 

(in NOK billion)

Non-current financial investments

Non-current derivative financial instruments - assets

Current derivative financial instruments - assets

Non-current derivative financial instruments liabilities

Total amount

(in USD million)

Non-current financial investments

Non-current derivative financial instruments - assets

Current derivative financial instruments - assets

Non-current derivative financial instruments liabilities

Current derivative financial instruments - liabilities

Total amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2015

 

 

 

Full year 2017

 

 

 

Opening balance

1.4

12.7

0.6

0.0

14.8

207

848

66

(6)

(4)

1,110

Total gains and losses recognised

 

 

 

- in statement of income

(0.0)

(3.6)

0.4

(0.5)

(3.6)

- in other comprehensive income

0.0

0.0

0.0

Total gains and losses recognised in statement of income

-

(69)

36

6

-

(27)

Purchases

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.2

90

-

-

90

Settlement

(0.0)

(0.9)

(0.6)

0.0

(1.5)

-

(533)

(67)

-

(600)

Transfer into level 3

94

-

-

94

Foreign currency translation differences

0.2

0.1

(0.0)

(0.0)

0.2

5

37

3

-

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

Closing balance

1.8

8.3

0.4

(0.5)

10.1

397

283

37

-

(4)

713

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2014

 

 

 

Full year 2016

 

 

 

Opening balance

0.9

12.0

1.3

0.0

14.2

209

941

50

(59)

-

1,141

Total gains and losses recognised

 

 

 

- in statement of income

(0.0)

0.3

0.6

0.0

0.9

- in other comprehensive income

0.0

0.0

0.0

Total gains and losses recognised in statement of income

-

(98)

66

49

-

17

Purchases

0.3

0.0

0.0

0.3

2

-

-

2

Sales

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.4

Settlement

(0.0)

0.0

(1.3)

0.0

(1.3)

(5)

(17)

(53)

-

(75)

Transfer to current portion

-

(1)

1

4

(4)

-

Foreign currency translation differences

0.2

0.1

(0.0)

0.0

0.3

1

23

1

-

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Closing balance

1.4

12.7

0.6

0.0

14.8

207

848

66

(6)

(4)

1,110

 

The assetsDuring 2017 the financial instruments within level 3 during 2015 have had a net decrease in the fair value of NOK 4.7 billion. Of the NOK 3.1 billionUSD 397 million.  The USD 27 million recognised in the Consolidated statement of income during 2015, NOK 2.8 billion is2017 are impacted by a reduction of USD 78 million related to changes in fair value of certain earn-out agreements. Related to the same earn-out agreements, NOK 1.5 billionUSD 528 million included in the opening balance for 20152017 has been agreed settled, while USD 72 million has been fully realised as the underlying volumes have been delivered during 2015 and the amount is presented as settled in the above table.

Substantially all gains and losses recognised in the Consolidated statement of income during 2015 are related to assets held at the end of 2015.2017.

 

Sensitivity analysis of market risk

 

Commodity price risk

The table below contains the fair value and related commodity price risk sensitivities of Statoil's commodity based derivatives contracts. For further information related to the type of commodity risks and how Statoil manages these risks, see note 5 Financial risk management.management.

 

Statoil's assets and liabilities resulting from commodity based derivatives contracts consist of both exchange traded and non-exchange traded instruments, including embedded derivatives that have been bifurcated and recognised at fair value in the Consolidated balance sheet.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015207


 

Price risk sensitivities at the end of 2015 have been calculated assuming a reasonably possible change of 30% in crude oil, refined products, electricity2017 at 20%, and natural gas prices. Atat the end of 2014 an assumption2016 at 30%, are assumed to represent a reasonably likely change based on the duration of 40% was used in the calculation and viewed as reasonable possible changes.derivatives.


 

Since none of the derivative financial instruments included in the table below are part of hedging relationships, any changes in the fair value would be recognised in the Consolidated statement of income.

 

(in NOK billion)

- 30% sensitivity

30% sensitivity

Commodity price sensitivity

2017

2016

(in USD million)

- 20%

+ 20%

- 30%

+ 30%

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

At 31 December

 

Crude oil and refined products net gains (losses)

1.0

(0.6)

687

(606)

395

(390)

Natural gas and electricity net gains (losses)

3.0

(3.0)

613

(613)

810

(809)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

- 40% sensitivity

40% sensitivity

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

Crude oil and refined products net gains (losses)

(1.7)

1.8

Natural gas and electricity net gains (losses)

0.7

(0.7)

 

Currency risk

Currency risk constitutes significant

The following currency risk sensitivity has been calculated, by assuming an 8% reasonable change in the main exchange rates that impact Statoil’s financial risk for Statoil. In accordance with approved strategiesaccounts, based on balances at 31 December 2017. At 31 December 2016 a change of 12% in the main exchange rates were viewed as a reasonable change.With reference to table below, an increase in the exchange rates means that the disclosed currency has strengthened in value against all other currencies. The estimated gains and mandates total exposure is managed atthe estimated losses following from a portfolio level on a regular basis.change in the exchange rates would impact the Consolidated statement of income. For further information related to the currency risk and how Statoil manages these risks, see note 5 Financial risk managementmanagement..

The following currency risk sensitivity has been calculated by assuming an 11% reasonably possible change in the main foreign exchange rates that Statoil is exposed to. At the end of 2014 a change of 9% in the foreign exchange rates were viewed as reasonably possible changes. An increase in the foreign exchange rates means that the transaction currency has strengthened in value. The estimated gains and the estimated losses following from a change in the foreign exchange rates would impact the Consolidated statement of income.

 

(in NOK billion)

- 11% sensitivity

11% sensitivity

Currency risk sensitivity

2017

2016

(in USD million)

- 8%

+ 8%

- 12%

+ 12%

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

At 31 December

 

 

USD net gains (losses)

15.4

(15.4)

119

(119)

79

(79)

NOK net gains (losses)

(14.8)

14.8

(94)

94

31

(31)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

- 9% sensitivity

9% sensitivity

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

USD net gains (losses)

8.1

(8.1)

NOK net gains (losses)

(8.3)

8.3

 

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk constitutes significant financial risk for Statoil. In accordance with approved strategies and mandates total exposure is managed at a portfolio level on a regular basis. For further information related to the interest risks and how Statoil manages these risks, see note 5 Financial risk management.

The following interest rate risk sensitivity has been calculated by assuming a change of 0.90.6 percentage points as reasonably possible changes in the interest rates at the end of 2015.2017. At the end of 20142016 a change of 0.8 percentage points in the interest rates was viewed as reasonably possible changes. The estimated gains following from a decrease in the interest rates and the estimated losses following from an interest rate increase would impact the Consolidated statement of income. For further information related to the interest risks and how Statoil manages these risks, see note 5 Financial risk management.

Interest risk sensitivity

2017

2016

(in USD million)

 - 0.6 percentage points

+ 0.6 percentage points

 - 0.8 percentage points

+ 0.8 percentage points

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December

 

 

 

 

Interest rate net gains (losses)

664

(664)

897

(897)

20826 Subsequent events

On 28 February 2018, Statoil received a notice of deviation from Norwegian tax authorities related to an ongoing dispute regarding the level of Research & Development cost to be allocated to the offshore tax regime, increasing the maximum exposure in this matter to USD 470 millionStatoil has provided for its best estimate in the matter, and is currently evaluating the notice of deviation.

1982   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

(in NOK billion)

 - 0.9 percentage points sensitivity

 0.9 percentage points sensitivity

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 

 

Interest rate net gains (losses)

10.7

(10.7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

 - 0.8 percentage points sensitivity

 0.8 percentage points sensitivity

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

Interest rate net gains (losses)

7.1

(7.1)

2627 Condensed consolidated financial information related to guaranteed debt securities

 

Statoil Petroleum AS, a 100% owned subsidiary of Statoil ASA, is the co-obligor of certain existing debt securities of Statoil ASA that are registered under the US Securities Act of 1933 ("US registered debt securities"). As co-obligor, Statoil Petroleum AS fully, unconditionally and irrevocably assumes and agrees to perform, jointly and severally with Statoil ASA, the payment and covenant obligations for these US registered debt securities. In addition, Statoil ASA is also the co-obligor of a US registered debt security of Statoil Petroleum AS. As co-obligor, Statoil ASA fully, unconditionally and irrevocably assumes and agrees to perform, jointly and severally with Statoil Petroleum AS, the payment and covenant obligations of that security. In the future, Statoil ASA may from time to time issue future US registered debt securities for which Statoil Petroleum AS will be the co-obligor or guarantor.

The following financial information on a condensed consolidated basis provides financial information about Statoil ASA, as issuer and co-obligor, Statoil Petroleum AS, as co-obligor and guarantor, and all other subsidiaries as required by SEC Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. The condensed consolidated information is prepared in accordance with Statoil's IFRS accounting policies as described in note 2 Significant accounting policies, except that investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method as required by Rule 3-10.

The following is condensed consolidated financial information for the full year 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, and as of 31 December 20152017 and 2014.2016.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2015 (in NOK billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues and other income

 316.0  

 165.6  

 165.6  

 (164.1) 

 483.1  

Net income from equity accounted companies

 (33.7) 

 (66.1) 

 (0.4) 

 99.9  

 (0.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

 282.3  

 99.5  

 165.2  

 (64.2) 

 482.8  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 (316.4) 

 (101.0) 

 (215.7) 

 165.2  

 (467.9) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

 (34.1) 

 (1.5) 

 (50.5) 

 101.0  

 14.9  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

 (22.5) 

 (0.8) 

 1.1  

 11.6  

 (10.6) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

 (56.6) 

 (2.3) 

 (49.3) 

 112.6  

 4.3  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

 7.5  

 (42.7) 

 (6.4) 

 (0.1) 

 (41.6) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 (49.1) 

 (45.0) 

 (55.7) 

 112.5  

 (37.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

 46.3  

 18.3  

 56.4  

 (86.3) 

 34.7  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 (2.8) 

 (26.7) 

 0.7  

 26.2  

 (2.6) 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2017 (in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues and other income

39,750

20,579

22,204

(21,535)

60,999

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted companies

5,051

(401)

33

(4,495)

188

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

44,801

20,178

22,237

(26,029)

61,187

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

(39,570)

(9,217)

(20,022)

21,392

(47,416)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income/(loss)

5,232

10,961

2,216

(4,637)

13,771

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

311

(378)

439

(724)

(351)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) before tax

5,543

10,583

2,655

(5,361)

13,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

(230)

(8,094)

(539)

40

(8,822)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

5,314

2,489

2,116

(5,321)

4,598

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

1,017

355

878

(509)

1,741

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

6,330

2,843

2,995

(5,830)

6,339

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    209199


 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2014 (in NOK billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues and other income

 411.1  

 210.8  

 213.7  

 (212.7) 

 622.9  

Net income from equity accounted companies

 21.6  

 (32.7) 

 (0.2) 

 11.0  

 (0.3) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

 432.8  

 178.1  

 213.4  

 (201.6) 

 622.7  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 (417.8) 

 (89.1) 

 (222.4) 

 216.0  

 (513.2) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

 15.0  

 89.0  

 (8.9) 

 14.4  

 109.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

 (12.6) 

 0.0  

 (0.4) 

 12.9  

 (0.0) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

 2.4  

 89.0  

 (9.3) 

 27.3  

 109.4  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

 6.6  

 (81.3) 

 (11.5) 

 (1.2) 

 (87.4) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 9.0  

 7.7  

 (20.8) 

 26.0  

 22.0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

 55.4  

 26.0  

 70.5  

 (109.3) 

 42.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 64.4  

 33.7  

 49.7  

 (83.3) 

 64.5  

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2016 (in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues and other income

31,580

15,405

15,472

(16,464)

45,993

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted companies

(2,726)

(3,987)

26

6,567

(119)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

28,854

11,418

15,498

(9,898)

45,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

(31,784)

(10,989)

(19,364)

16,344

(45,793)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income/(loss)

(2,930)

429

(3,865)

6,446

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

728

(560)

(115)

(311)

(258)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) before tax

(2,202)

(131)

(3,980)

6,135

(178)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

(407)

(2,392)

97

(23)

(2,724)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

(2,608)

(2,523)

(3,884)

6,113

(2,902)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

(671)

153

(280)

441

(357)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

(3,279)

(2,370)

(4,163)

6,553

(3,259)



 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2013 (in NOK billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues and other income

 416.7  

 228.8  

 212.1  

 (223.2) 

 634.4  

Net income from equity accounted companies

 55.0  

 (8.0) 

 (0.2) 

 (46.6) 

 0.1  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

 471.7  

 220.8  

 211.9  

 (269.8) 

 634.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 (418.3) 

 (85.5) 

 (199.0) 

 223.6  

 (479.1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income

 53.5  

 135.3  

 12.9  

 (46.2) 

 155.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

 (27.7) 

 (1.0) 

 5.9  

 5.7  

 (17.0) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before tax

 25.8  

 134.3  

 18.8  

 (40.5) 

 138.4  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

 8.1  

 (95.3) 

 (11.7) 

 (0.2) 

 (99.2) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 33.9  

 39.0  

 7.1  

 (40.7) 

 39.2  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

 24.2  

 5.0  

 27.6  

 (38.2) 

 18.5  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 58.1  

 44.0  

 34.7  

 (78.9) 

 57.7  

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2015 (in USD million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues and other income

39,289

20,583

20,248

(20,448)

59,671

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted companies

(4,686)

(8,350)

(42)

13,050

(29)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

34,603

12,232

20,205

(7,399)

59,642

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

(39,372)

(12,561)

(26,907)

20,566

(58,276)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating income/(loss)

(4,769)

(329)

(6,702)

13,167

1,366

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net financial items

(2,771)

(106)

139

1,427

(1,311)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income/(loss) before tax

(7,541)

(435)

(6,563)

14,594

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

925

(5,301)

(840)

(9)

(5,225)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss)

(6,616)

(5,736)

(7,402)

14,585

(5,169)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

(1,414)

(1,771)

(1,405)

1,751

(2,838)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

(8,030)

(7,507)

(8,807)

16,336

(8,007)

2102002   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

At 31 December 2015 (in NOK billion)

At 31 December 2017 (in USD million)

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

 

ASSETS

 

 

Property, plant, equipment and intangible assets

 5.6  

 261.2  

 363.0  

 (0.3) 

 629.5  

541

32,956

38,786

(25)

72,258

Equity accounted companies

 472.5  

 181.0  

 3.8  

 (650.1) 

 7.3  

42,625

21,593

1,311

(62,978)

2,551

Other non-current assets

 38.4  

 8.9  

 34.7  

 0.0  

 82.0  

3,851

346

4,989

(84)

9,102

Non-current receivables from subsidiaries

 123.1  

 0.0  

 0.2  

 (123.3) 

 0.0  

25,896

(0)

22

(25,918)

0

 

 

Total non-current assets

 639.6  

 451.1  

 401.7  

 (773.8) 

 718.7  

72,914

54,895

45,107

(89,005)

83,911

 

 

Current receivables from subsidiaries

 10.9  

 20.4  

 120.1  

 (151.4) 

 (0.0) 

2,448

2,615

14,215

(19,278)

0

Other current assets

 130.8  

 8.9  

 36.3  

 (3.9) 

 172.1  

16,165

923

5,582

(1,240)

21,430

Cash and cash equivalents

 65.8  

 0.8  

 9.4  

 0.0  

 76.0  

3,759

27

603

0

4,390

 

 

Total current assets

 207.5  

 30.1  

 165.7  

 (155.3) 

 248.0  

22,372

3,566

20,400

(20,517)

25,820

 

Assets classified as held for sale

0

1,369

0

1,369

 

 

Total assets

 847.2  

 481.2  

 567.4  

 (929.1) 

 966.7  

95,286

58,460

66,876

(109,523)

111,100

 

 

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

 

 

Total equity

 354.7  

 184.1  

 463.4  

 (647.2) 

 355.1  

39,861

20,813

42,634

(63,422)

39,885

 

 

Non-current liabilities to subsidiaries

 0.1  

 120.9  

 2.3  

 (123.3) 

 0.0  

19

14,682

11,263

(25,964)

0

Other non-current liabilities

 303.2  

 126.5  

 47.9  

 (1.2) 

 476.3  

29,070

16,145

7,104

(122)

52,197

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

 303.3  

 247.4  

 50.1  

 (124.5) 

 476.3  

29,090

30,827

18,367

(26,086)

52,198

 

 

Other current liabilities

 52.5  

 38.6  

 50.3  

 (6.0) 

 135.3  

9,242

5,879

4,632

(736)

19,017

Current liabilities to subsidiaries

 136.7  

 11.1  

 3.6  

 (151.4) 

 0.0  

17,094

941

1,243

(19,278)

0

 

 

Total current liabilities

 189.1  

 49.7  

 53.9  

 (157.4) 

 135.3  

26,335

6,821

5,874

(20,014)

19,017

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 492.4  

 297.1  

 104.0  

 (281.9) 

 611.7  

55,425

37,648

24,242

(46,100)

71,214

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

 847.2  

 481.2  

 567.4  

 (929.1) 

 966.7  

95,286

58,460

66,876

(109,523)

111,100

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    211201


CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

At 31 December 2014 (in NOK billion)

At 31 December 2016 (in USD million)

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

Property, plant, equipment and intangible assets

 5.9  

 276.4  

 365.3  

 (0.4) 

 647.3  

576

29,944

38,310

(31)

68,799

Equity accounted companies

 490.0  

 140.5  

 7.5  

 (629.6) 

 8.4  

40,294

18,089

1,013

(57,151)

2,245

Other non-current assets

 34.8  

 13.0  

 28.2  

 0.0  

 76.0  

3,212

945

3,933

0

8,090

Non-current receivables from subsidiaries

 68.6  

 0.4  

 0.2  

 (69.2) 

 0.0  

23,644

(0)

26

(23,670)

0

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

 599.3  

 430.3  

 401.2  

 (699.2) 

 731.7  

67,725

48,979

43,281

(80,852)

79,133

 

 

 

Current receivables from subsidiaries

 16.1  

 50.3  

 89.0  

 (155.4) 

 0.0  

4,305

2,141

12,879

(19,325)

0

Other current assets

 116.7  

 14.2  

 46.8  

 (6.0) 

 171.6  

14,716

924

4,769

(639)

19,769

Cash and cash equivalents

 71.5  

 0.6  

 11.0  

 0.0  

 83.1  

4,274

46

770

0

5,090

 

 

 

Total current assets

 204.4  

 65.0  

 146.7  

 (161.4) 

 254.8  

23,295

3,111

18,418

(19,964)

24,859

 

 

Assets classified as held for sale

0

0

537

0

537

 

 

 

Total assets

 803.8  

 495.4  

 547.9  

 (860.6) 

 986.4  

91,021

52,089

62,236

(100,816)

104,530

 

 

 

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Total equity

 380.8  

 215.1  

 412.4  

 (627.1) 

 381.2  

35,072

17,974

39,510

(57,457)

35,099

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities to subsidiaries

 0.1  

 66.3  

 2.7  

 (69.2) 

 0.0  

17

12,848

10,806

(23,670)

0

Other non-current liabilities

 238.2  

 144.9  

 45.3  

 (2.3) 

 426.2  

33,065

13,812

5,953

(198)

52,633

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

 238.4  

 211.2  

 48.0  

 (71.4) 

 426.2  

33,082

26,660

16,759

(23,868)

52,633

 

 

 

Other current liabilities

 68.1  

 60.0  

 57.6  

 (6.7) 

 179.0  

7,757

4,419

4,735

(166)

16,744

Current liabilities to subsidiaries

 116.5  

 9.1  

 29.8  

 (155.4) 

 0.0  

15,109

3,037

1,179

(19,325)

0

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 184.6  

 69.1  

 87.4  

 (162.1) 

 179.0  

22,866

7,456

5,913

(19,492)

16,744

 

 

 

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale

0

0

(54)

0

(54)

 

 

Total liabilities

 423.0  

 280.3  

 135.5  

 (233.5) 

 605.2  

55,948

34,116

22,727

(43,359)

69,431

 

 

 

Total equity and liabilities

 803.8  

 495.4  

 547.9  

 (860.6) 

 986.4  

91,021

52,089

62,236

(100,816)

104,530

2122022   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2015 (in NOK billion)

Full year 2017 (in USD million)

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

 23.5  

 64.7  

 37.4  

 (16.6) 

 109.0  

(92)

9,506

5,235

(286)

14,363

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

 (44.8) 

 (141.3) 

 (46.9) 

 117.9  

 (115.1) 

3,658

(9,070)

(4,711)

444

(9,678)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 9.9  

 76.7  

 7.2  

 (101.3) 

 (7.5) 

(4,459)

(478)

(727)

(158)

(5,822)

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 (11.5) 

 0.1  

 (2.3) 

 0.0  

 (13.6) 

(892)

(42)

(203)

0

(1,137)

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 5.7  

 0.1  

 1.3  

 0.0  

 7.1  

377

23

36

0

436

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period (net of overdraft)

 71.5  

 0.6  

 10.3  

 0.0  

 82.4  

4,274

46

770

0

5,090

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period (net of overdraft)

 65.8  

 0.8  

 9.3  

 0.0  

 75.9  

3,759

27

603

0

4,390

 

 

 

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2014 (in NOK billion)

Full year 2016 (in USD million)

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

 18.6  

 73.2  

 56.9  

 (22.2) 

 126.5  

3,330

7,262

1,561

(3,119)

9,034

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

 (16.9) 

 (59.4) 

 (55.5) 

 19.8  

 (112.0) 

(3,138)

(6,785)

(5,393)

4,869

(10,446)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 (11.0) 

 (13.2) 

 (1.3) 

 2.4  

 (23.1) 

(3,308)

(516)

3,616

(1,750)

(1,959)

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 (9.3) 

 0.6  

 0.1  

 0.0  

 (8.6) 

(3,116)

(39)

(216)

0

(3,371)

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 3.8  

 0.1  

 1.9  

 0.0  

 5.8  

(81)

(2)

(69)

0

(152)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period (net of overdraft)

 77.0  

 0.0  

 8.3  

 0.0  

 85.3  

7,471

87

1,056

0

8,613

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period (net of overdraft)

 71.5  

 0.7  

 10.3  

 0.0  

 82.5  

4,274

46

770

0

5,090

 

 

 

 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

Full year 2013 (in NOK billion)

Full year 2015 (in USD million)

Statoil ASA

Statoil Petroleum AS

Non-guarantor subsidiaries

Consolidation adjustments

The Statoil group

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities

 64.3  

 69.9  

 39.6  

 (72.6) 

 101.3  

2,883

8,348

4,567

(2,170)

13,628

Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities

 (46.9) 

 (46.0) 

 (87.4) 

 69.9  

 (110.4) 

(5,694)

(17,219)

(5,630)

14,042

(14,501)

Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities

 (0.6) 

 (23.9) 

 48.5  

 2.7  

 26.6  

1,333

8,986

824

(11,872)

(729)

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 16.8  

 0.0  

 0.7  

 0.0  

 17.5  

(1,478)

115

(239)

0

(1,602)

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 2.7  

 0.0  

 0.2  

 0.0  

 2.9  

(677)

(106)

(88)

0

(871)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period (net of overdraft)

 57.4  

 0.0  

 7.5  

 0.0  

 64.9  

9,625

78

1,382

0

11,085

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period (net of overdraft)

 77.0  

 0.0  

 8.3  

 0.0  

 85.3  

7,470

87

1,055

0

8,613

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    213203


 

274.2 Supplementary oil and gas information (unaudited)

 

In accordance with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification "Extractive Activities - Oil and Gas" (Topic 932), Statoil is reporting certain supplemental disclosures about oil and gas exploration and production operations. While this information is developed with reasonable care and disclosed in good faith, it is emphasised that some of the data is necessarily imprecise and represents only approximate amounts because of the subjective judgement involved in developing such information. Accordingly, this information may not necessarily represent the present financial condition of Statoil or its expected future results.

 

For further information regarding the reserves estimation requirement, see note 2 Significant accounting policies- Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty - Proved oil and gas reserves.reserves within the Consolidated financial statements.

 

No new events have occurred since 31 December 20152017 that would result in a significant change in the estimated proved reserves or other figures reported as of that date.

 

The disputedAgbami equity determinationredetermination in Nigeria implies a reduction of 5.17 percentage points in Statoil’s equity interest in the field. Statoil has proceeded to the court of appeal to have the arbitration award set aside. Final approval in the licence was pending at Agbamiyear end 2017, hence the negative effect on the proved reserves, which is estimated to be less than 10 million boe, is not yet included.

In Algeria, an agreement has been signed which will potentially alter Statoil's equity share in this field.amend the In Amenas Production Sharing Contract by five years, from 2022 to 2027. The effect on the proved reserves will be included once the redeterminationagreement is finalisedapproved by the authorities and the effect is known. The effect of the farm out of the Leismer oil sands projects was implemented in 2017 resulting in a reduction of the proved reserves in Canada.

 

Oil and gas reserve quantities

Statoil's oil and gas reserves have been estimated by its qualified professionals in accordance with industry standards under the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X. Statements of reserves are forward-looking statements.

 

The determination of these reserves is part of an ongoing process subject to continual revision as additional information becomes available. Estimates of proved reserve quantities are imprecise and change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, identified reserves and contingent resources that may become proved in the future are excluded from the calculations.

 

Statoil's proved reserves are recognised under various forms of contractual agreements, including production sharing agreements (PSAs) where Statoil's share of reserves can vary due to commodity prices or other factors. Reserves from agreements such as PSAs and buy back agreements are based on the volumes to which Statoil has access (cost oil and profit oil), limited to available market access. At 31 December 2015, 9%2017, 6% of total proved reserves were related to such agreements (15%(11% of total oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGL) reserves and 3%2% of total gas reserves). This compares with 12%7% and 14%9% of total proved reserves for 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Net entitlement oil and gas production from fields with such agreements was 94 million boe during 2017 (96 million boe for 2016 and 104 million boe during 2015 (95 million boe for 2014 and 93 million boe for 2013)2015). Statoil participates in such agreements in Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Libya, Nigeria and Russia.

 

Statoil is recording, as proved reserves, volumes equivalent to our tax liabilities under negotiated fiscal arrangements (PSAs) where the tax is paid on behalf of Statoil. Reserves are net of royalty oil paid in kind and quantities consumed during production.

 

Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X requires that the appraisalestimation of reserves is based on existing economic conditions, including a 12-month average price prior todetermined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the end offirst-of-the month price for each month within the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements. The proved reserves at year end 20152017 have been determined based on a Brent blend price equivalent of USD 54.17/54.32/bbl, compared to USD 101.27/42.82/bbl and USD 108.02/54.17/bbl for 20142016 and 20132015 respectively. The volume weighted average gas price for proved reserves at year end 20152017 was 1.76 NOK/Sm3.USD 4.65 mmBtu. The comparable gas price used to determine gas reserves at year end 20142016 and 20132015 was 1.90 NOK/Sm3USD 4.50 mmBtu and 2.13 NOK/Sm3. USD 5.76 mmBtu. The volume weighted average NGL price for proved reserves at year end 20152017 was USD 30.56/32.02/boe. The corresponding NGL price used to determine NGL reserves at year end 20142016 and 20132015 was USD 57.03/24.85/boe and USD 62.32/30.56/boe. The significant decreaseincrease in commodity prices affects the profitable reserves to be recovered from accumulations, resulting in reducedincreased reserves. The negativepositive revisions due to price are in general a result of earlierextended economic cut-off. For fields with a production-sharing type of agreement this is to some degree offset by higherlower entitlement to the reserves. These changes are all included in the revision category in the tables below,, giving a net reductionincrease of Statoil’s proved reserves at year end.

 

From the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS), Statoil is responsible for managing, transporting and selling the Norwegian State's oil and gas on behalf of the Norwegian State's direct financial interest (SDFI). These reserves are sold in conjunction with the Statoil reserves. As part of this arrangement, Statoil delivers and sells gas to customers in accordance with various types of sales contracts on behalf of the SDFI. In order to fulfil the commitments, Statoil utilises a field supply schedule which provides the highest possible total value for the joint portfolio of oil and gas between Statoil and the SDFI.

 

Statoil and the SDFI receive income from the joint natural gas sales portfolio based upon their respective share in the supplied volumes. For sales of the SDFI natural gas, to Statoil and to third parties, the payment to the Norwegian State is based on achieved prices, a net back formula calculated price or market value. All of the Norwegian State's oil and NGL is acquired by Statoil. The price Statoil pays to the SDFI for the crude oil is based on market reflective prices. The prices for NGL are either based on achieved prices, market value or market reflective prices.

2042Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


 

The regulations of the owner's instruction, as described above, may be changed or withdrawn by the Statoil ASA's general meeting. Due to this uncertainty and the Norwegian State's estimate of proved reserves not being available to Statoil, it is not possible to determine the total quantities to be purchased by Statoil under the owner's instruction.

 

214Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


Topic 932 requires the presentation of reserves and certain other supplemental oil and gas disclosures by geographicalgeographic area, defined as country or continent containing 15% or more of total proved reserves. At 31 December 2017 Norway contains 75%73% and US 16% of total proved reserves at 31 December 2015 and no other country contains reserves approaching 15% ofthe total proved reserves. Accordingly, management has determined that the most meaningful presentation of geographicalgeographic areas would be Norway, US, and the continents of Eurasia (excluding Norway), Africa, and Americas.Americas (excluding US).

 

The following tables reflect the estimated proved reserves of oil and gas at 31 December 20122014 through 2015,2017, and the changes therein.

 

 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Subtotal

Americas

Total

Net proved oil and condensate reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 968  

 193  

 281  

 395  

 1,837  

 82  

 1,919  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 133  

 16  

 40  

 18  

 207  

 (16) 

 191  

Extensions and discoveries

 19  

 47  

 8  

 34  

 108  

 0  

 108  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 13  

 0  

 0  

 0  

 13  

 0  

 13  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (40) 

 (15) 

 0  

 (2) 

 (57) 

 0  

 (57) 

Production

 (174) 

 (15) 

 (58) 

 (46) 

 (294) 

 (4) 

 (298) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2013

 918  

 227  

 271  

 399  

 1,815  

 63  

 1,877  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 143  

 10  

 85  

 (4) 

 235  

 (3) 

 232  

Extensions and discoveries

 3  

 0  

 5  

 145  

 153  

 0  

 153  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 0  

 0  

 20  

 20  

 0  

 20  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (5) 

 (27) 

 (2) 

 0  

 (34) 

 0  

 (34) 

Production

 (173) 

 (14) 

 (64) 

 (51) 

 (301) 

 (4) 

 (306) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 886  

 196  

 296  

 508  

 1,887  

 55  

 1,942  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 71  

 (68) 

 57  

 (54) 

 5  

 (5) 

 0  

Extensions and discoveries

 437  

 0  

 0  

 74  

 511  

 0  

 511  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 0  

 0  

 4  

 4  

 0  

 4  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (4) 

 (38) 

 0  

 (1) 

 (43) 

 0  

 (43) 

Production

 (174) 

 (13) 

 (75) 

 (57) 

 (319) 

 (4) 

 (324) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 1,216  

 76  

 278  

 474  

 2,045  

 46  

 2,091  

The reason for the most significant changes to our proved reserves at year end 2017 were:

Revisions of previously booked reserves, including the effect of improved recovery, increased the proved reserves by 605 million boe in 2017. Many producing fields have significant positive revisions due to better performance, maturing of new wells and improved recovery projects, as well as reduced uncertainty due to further drilling and production experience. The effect of the increased commodity prices, increasing the proved reserves by approximately 200 million boe through extended economic life time on several fields, is also included in this. The largest revisions are seen in Norway, where many of the larger offshore fields continue to decline less than assumed for the proved reserves, and in the US where continued drilling and production from the onshore plays in the Appalachian basin (Marcellus and Utica), Bakken and Eagle Ford have increased the proved reserves

A total of 441 million boe of new proved reserves are added through extensions and new discoveries booking proved reserves for the first time. New field developments in Norway, such as Johan Castberg, Ærfugl and Bauge, and Peregrino Phase 2 in Brazil, all contribute to this with a total of 260 million boe. Extensions of the proved areas in the US onshore plays contribute with167 million boe. The remaining 14 million boe come from other minor extensions on producing fields where new wells have been drilled in previously unproven areas

New discoveries with proved reserves booked in 2017 are all expected to start production within a period of five years

A total of 50 million boe of new proved reserves were purchased in 2017 (the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli PSA extension and transfer of certain ownership shares in the Appalachian basin from Northwood Energy)

Sale of 38 million boe of proved reserves from the Leismer oil sands development in Canada which was finalised in 2017

The 2017 entitlement production was 705 million boe, an increase of 4.7% compared to 2016

 

Proved reserves of bitumen in Americas, representing less than 2% of Statoil'sChanges to the proved reserves is included asin 2017 are also described in some detail by each geographic area in section 2.8 Operational performance, Proved oil and gas reserves. Development of the proved reserves are described in the table above.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015215section 2.8 Operational performance, Development of reserves.


 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Subtotal

Americas

Total

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Total

Net proved NGL reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 405  

 0  

 18  

 47  

 469  

 0  

 469  

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 25  

 0  

 (0) 

 4  

 28  

 0  

 28  

Extensions and discoveries

 1  

 0  

 10  

 11  

 0  

 11  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 0  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (21) 

 0  

 (21) 

 0  

 (21) 

Production

 (42) 

 0  

 (1) 

 (4) 

 (47) 

 0  

 (47) 

 

 

At 31 December 2013

 368  

 0  

 16  

 56  

 441  

 0  

 441  

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 (2) 

 0  

 1  

 5  

 4  

 0  

 4  

Extensions and discoveries

 3  

 0  

 18  

 21  

 0  

 21  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 0  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (10) 

 0  

 (2) 

 (12) 

 0  

 (12) 

Production

 (42) 

 0  

 (2) 

 (7) 

 (51) 

 0  

 (51) 

 

 

Net proved oil and condensate reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 318  

 0  

 15  

 69  

 403  

 0  

 403  

886

196

296

279

230

1,887

                                                -

55

1,942

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 7  

 0  

 3  

 (20) 

 (10) 

 0  

 (10) 

71

(68)

57

(6)

(48)

5

                                                -

(5)

0

Extensions and discoveries

 11  

 0  

 16  

 27  

 0  

 27  

437

                                                -

                                                -

39

34

511

                                                -

511

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 4  

 4  

 0  

 4  

                                                -

                                                -

4

                                                -

4

                                                -

4

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (1) 

 0  

 (5) 

 (5) 

 0  

 (5) 

(4)

(38)

                                                -

(1)

                                                -

(43)

                                                -

(43)

Production

 (44) 

 0  

 (3) 

 (7) 

 (54) 

 0  

 (54) 

(174)

(13)

(75)

(31)

(27)

(319)

                                                -

(4)

(324)

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 291  

 0  

 15  

 57  

 364  

 0  

 364  

1,216

76

278

285

189

2,045

                                                -

46

2,091

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

111

6

16

7

10

149

                                                -

(12)

137

Extensions and discoveries

29

                                                -

                                                -

45

4

78

                                          ��     -

                                                -

78

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                                -

                                                -

                                                -

                                                -

60

0

                                                -

60

Sales of reserves-in-place

(14)

                                                -

                                                -

                                                -

                                                -

(14)

                                                -

(14)

Production

(169)

(12)

(72)

(34)

(26)

(313)

(2)

(0)

(4)

(6)

(320)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

1,174

71

221

303

177

1,945

58

                                                -

30

88

2,033

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

212

2

32

55

54

354

1

0

(28)

(27)

327

Extensions and discoveries

159

                                                -

                                                -

31

65

256

                                                -

256

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                                -

34

                                                -

                                                -

                                                -

34

                                                -

                                                - 

34

Sales of reserves-in-place

                                                -

                                                -

                                                -

(38)

                                                -

(38)

Production

(165)

(10)

(68)

(38)

(21)

(302)

(6)

(0)

(2)

(8)

(310)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

1,380

97

185

351

237

2,249

53

                                                -

53

2,302

2162062   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Subtotal

Americas

Total

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas exclusing US

Subtotal

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Americas exclusing US

Subtotal

Total

Net proved gas reserves in billion standard cubic feet

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 15,003  

 575  

 341  

 1,107  

 17,027  

 0  

 17,027  

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 391  

 187  

 27  

 382  

 987  

 0  

 987  

Extensions and discoveries

 920  

 1,236  

 0  

 112  

 2,268  

 0  

 2,268  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 5  

 0  

 5  

 0  

 5  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (295) 

 (3) 

 0  

 (2) 

 (300) 

 0  

 (300) 

Production

 (1,264) 

 (72) 

 (40) 

 (196) 

 (1,571) 

 0  

 (1,571) 

 

 

At 31 December 2013

 14,761  

 1,923  

 328  

 1,404  

 18,416  

 0  

 18,416  

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 439  

 32  

 8  

 197  

 676  

 0  

 676  

Extensions and discoveries

 79  

 0  

 364  

 443  

 0  

 443  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 0  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (355) 

 (681) 

 0  

 (15) 

 (1,051) 

 0  

 (1,051) 

Production

 (1,229) 

 (56) 

 (38) 

 (242) 

 (1,565) 

 0  

 (1,565) 

 

 

Net proved NGL reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 13,694  

 1,218  

 299  

 1,708  

 16,919  

 0  

 16,919  

318

                                         -

15

69

                                         -

403

                                         -

403

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 385  

 (18) 

 129  

 (676) 

 (180) 

 0  

 (180) 

7

                                         -

3

(20)

                                         -

(10)

                                         -

(10)

Extensions and discoveries

 179  

 0  

 318  

 497  

 0  

 497  

11

                                         -

                                         -

16

                                         -

27

                                         -

                                         - 

                                         -

27

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 31  

 31  

 0  

 31  

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

4

                                         -

4

                                         -

4

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (10) 

 (991) 

 0  

 (42) 

 (1,043) 

 0  

 (1,043) 

(1)

                                         -

                                         -

(5)

                                         -

(5)

                                         -

(5)

Production

 (1,306) 

 (16) 

 (63) 

 (215) 

 (1,600) 

 0  

 (1,600) 

(44)

                                         -

(3)

(7)

                                         -

(54)

                                         -

(54)

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 12,942  

 193  

 366  

 1,123  

 14,624  

 0  

 14,624  

291

                                         -

15

57

                                         -

364

                                         -

364

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

37

                                         -

3

6

                                         -

46

                                         -

46

Extensions and discoveries

5

                                         -

                                         -

13

                                         -

18

                                         -

18

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

2

                                         -

                                         - 

2

Sales of reserves-in-place

(0)

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

(0)

                                         -

(0)

Production

(46)

                                         -

(2)

(9)

                                         -

(58)

(0)

                                         -

(0)

(58)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

287

                                         -

16

67

                                         -

370

2

                                         -

2

372

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

31

                                         -

(2)

6

0

36

(1)

                                         -

(1)

35

Extensions and discoveries

8

                                         -

                                         -

25

                                         -

33

                                         -

33

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

Sales of reserves-in-place

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

                                         -

Production

(48)

                                         -

(4)

(9)

(0)

(61)

                                         -

(61)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

278

                                         -

10

90

                                         -

378

1

                                         -

1

379

 

  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    217207


 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Subtotal

Americas

Total

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Total

Net proved reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 4,046  

 296  

 360  

 639  

 5,340  

 82  

 5,422  

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 227  

 49  

 44  

 90  

 411  

 (16) 

 395  

Extensions and discoveries

 183  

 268  

 8  

 64  

 523  

 0  

 523  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 14  

 0  

 14  

 0  

 14  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (113) 

 (15) 

 0  

 (2) 

 (131) 

 0  

 (131) 

Production

 (441) 

 (28) 

 (66) 

 (85) 

 (621) 

 (4) 

 (625) 

 

 

At 31 December 2013

 3,916  

 569  

 346  

 705  

 5,537  

 63  

 5,600  

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 219  

 16  

 87  

 36  

 359  

 (3) 

 356  

Extensions and discoveries

 20  

 0  

 5  

 227  

 253  

 0  

 253  

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 20  

 20  

 0  

 20  

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (78) 

 (148) 

 (2) 

 (5) 

 (233) 

 0  

 (233) 

Production

 (434) 

 (24) 

 (72) 

 (102) 

 (631) 

 (4) 

 (635) 

 

 

Net proved gas reserves in billion standard cubic feet

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 3,644  

 413  

 364  

 882  

 5,304  

 55  

 5,359  

13,694

1,218

299

1,708

                                        -

16,919

                                        -

16,919

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

 146  

 (72) 

 83  

 (194) 

 (37) 

 (5) 

 (42) 

385

(18)

129

(676)

0

(180)

                                        -

(180)

Extensions and discoveries

 480  

 0  

 146  

 627  

 0  

 627  

179

                                        -

318

                                        -

497

                                        -

497

Purchase of reserves-in-place

 0  

 13  

 13  

 0  

 13  

                                        -

31

                                        -

31

                                        -

31

Sales of reserves-in-place

 (6) 

 (215) 

 0  

 (13) 

 (235) 

 0  

 (235) 

(10)

(991)

                                        -

(42)

                                        -

(1,043)

                                        -

(1,043)

Production

 (450) 

 (16) 

 (88) 

 (103) 

 (658) 

 (4) 

 (662) 

(1,306)

(16)

(63)

(215)

(0)

(1,600)

                                        -

(1,600)

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

 3,814  

 111  

 358  

 731  

 5,014  

 46  

 5,060  

12,942

193

366

1,123

                                        -

14,624

                                        -

14,624

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

1,160

29

(25)

101

0

1,265

                                        -

1,265

Extensions and discoveries

78

                                        -

384

                                        -

462

                                        -

462

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                        -

                                        -

16

0

                                        -

16

Sales of reserves-in-place

(5)

                                        -

(65)

                                        -

(70)

                                        -

(70)

Production

(1,338)

(34)

(60)

(226)

(0)

(1,659)

(1)

(0)

                                        -

(2)

(1,661)

 

 

At 31 December 2016

12,836

188

280

1,318

                                        -

14,623

15

                                        -

15

14,637

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

824

13

102

425

0

1,363

(1)

0

                                        -

(1)

1,363

Extensions and discoveries

198

                                        -

659

                                        -

857

                                        -

                                        - 

857

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                        -

90

                                        -

90

                                        -

90

Sales of reserves-in-place

                                        -

                                        -

                                        - 

                                        -

Production

(1,515)

(41)

(72)

(240)

(0)

(1,868)

(4)

(0)

                                        -

(5)

(1,873)

 

 

At 31 December 2017

12,343

159

310

2,252

                                        -

15,064

9

                                        -

9

15,073

 

Proved reserves of bitumen in Americas, representing less than 2% of Statoil's proved reserves, is included as oil in the table above.

2182082   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Subtotal

Americas

Total

Net proved oil and condensate reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 547  

 79  

 221  

 164  

 1,010  

 38  

 1,049  

Undeveloped

 421  

 114  

 61  

 231  

 827  

 44  

 870  

At 31 December 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 548  

 63  

 197  

 212  

 1,020  

 32  

 1,052  

Undeveloped

 370  

 164  

 74  

 187  

 795  

 30  

 826  

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 559  

 63  

 243  

 267  

 1,133  

 24  

 1,156  

Undeveloped

 327  

 133  

 52  

 242  

 754  

 32  

 786  

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 505  

 48  

 248  

 282  

 1,083  

 21  

 1,104  

Undeveloped

 711  

 29  

 30  

 192  

 962  

 25  

 987  

Net proved NGL reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 296  

 0  

 11  

 27  

 334  

 0  

 334  

Undeveloped

 109  

 0  

 7  

 20  

 135  

 0  

 135  

At 31 December 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 287  

 0  

 10  

 34  

 330  

 0  

 330  

Undeveloped

 82  

 0  

 7  

 22  

 111  

 0  

 111  

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 258  

 0  

 9  

 42  

 310  

 0  

 310  

Undeveloped

 60  

 0  

 6  

 27  

 93  

 0  

 93  

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 235  

 0  

 9  

 45  

 290  

 0  

 290  

Undeveloped

 56  

 0  

 6  

 12  

 74  

 0  

 74  

Net proved gas reserves in billion standard cubic feet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 12,073  

 343  

 226  

 567  

 13,210  

 0  

 13,210  

Undeveloped

 2,931  

 232  

 115  

 540  

 3,817  

 0  

 3,817  

At 31 December 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 11,580  

 467  

 209  

 817  

 13,073  

 0  

 13,073  

Undeveloped

 3,181  

 1,455  

 120  

 586  

 5,343  

 0  

 5,343  

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 11,227  

 312  

 191  

 946  

 12,677  

 0  

 12,677  

Undeveloped

 2,467  

 906  

 108  

 762  

 4,242  

 0  

 4,242  

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 10,664  

 32  

 206  

 999  

 11,901  

 0  

 11,901  

Undeveloped

 2,278  

 161  

 160  

 124  

 2,723  

 0  

 2,723  

Net proved oil, condensate, NGL and gas reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 2,994  

 140  

 272  

 292  

 3,698  

 38  

 3,737  

Undeveloped

 1,052  

 155  

 88  

 347  

 1,642  

 44  

 1,686  

At 31 December 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 2,898  

 146  

 244  

 392  

 3,679  

 32  

 3,711  

Undeveloped

 1,018  

 423  

 103  

 314  

 1,858  

 30  

 1,888  

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 2,818  

 119  

 287  

 477  

 3,701  

 24  

 3,725  

Undeveloped

 826  

 295  

 78  

 405  

 1,603  

 32  

 1,635  

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

 2,641  

 53  

 294  

 505  

 3,494  

 21  

 3,515  

Undeveloped

 1,173  

 57  

 64  

 226  

 1,521  

 25  

 1,546  

 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Total

Net proved reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

3,644

413

364

653

230

5,304

                                        -

                                        -

55

55

5,359

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

146

(72)

83

(146)

(48)

(37)

                                        -

                                        -

(5)

(5)

(42)

Extensions and discoveries

480

                                        -

                                        -

112

34

627

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

627

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

13

                                        -

13

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

13

Sales of reserves-in-place

(6)

(215)

                                        -

(13)

                                        -

(235)

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

(235)

Production

(450)

(16)

(88)

(76)

(27)

(658)

                                        -

                                        -

(4)

(4)

(662)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2015

3,814

111

358

542

189

5,014

-

-

46

46

5,060

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

355

11

14

31

10

421

                                        -

                                        -

(12)

(12)

409

Extensions and discoveries

48

                                        -

                                        -

127

4

179

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

179

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

65

0

                                        -

65

65

Sales of reserves-in-place

(15)

                                        -

                                        -

(11)

                                        -

(27)

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

(27)

Production

(454)

(18)

(85)

(83)

(26)

(666)

(3)

(0)

(4)

(7)

(673)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2016

3,748

104

287

605

177

4,921

62

-

30

92

5,013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revisions and improved recovery

390

4

48

137

54

633

0

0

(28)

(28)

605

Extensions and discoveries

202

                                        -

                                        -

174

65

441

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

441

Purchase of reserves-in-place

                                        -

34

                                        -

16

                                        -

50

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

50

Sales of reserves-in-place

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

(38)

(38)

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

                                        -

(38)

Production

(483)

(17)

(85)

(90)

(21)

(696)

(6)

(0)

(2)

(9)

(705)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2017

3,857

125

250

842

237

5,311

56

-

-

56

5,367

  

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    219209


 

 

Consolidated companies

Equity accounted

Total

 

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Americas excluding US

Subtotal

Total

Net proved oil and condensate reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

559

63

243

139

128

1,133

-

-

24

24

1,156

Undeveloped

327

133

52

140

102

754

-

-

32

32

786

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

505

48

248

163

119

1,083

                                            -

-

21

21

1,104

Undeveloped

711

29

30

122

70

962

                                            -

-

25

25

987

At 31 December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

536

43

200

182

121

1,082

7

-

16

23

1,105

Undeveloped

638

28

22

121

55

863

51

-

13

65

928

At 31 December 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

514

55

173

252

118

1,112

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

1,112

Undeveloped

866

42

12

99

119

1,138

53

-

                                      -

53

1,191

Net proved NGL reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

258

                                               -

9

42

                                          -

310

-

-

                                      -

                                                  -

310

Undeveloped

60

                                               -

6

27

                                          -

93

-

-

                                      -

                                                  -

93

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

235

                                               -

9

45

                                          -

290

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

290

Undeveloped

56

                                               -

6

12

                                          -

74

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

74

At 31 December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

213

                                               -

10

53

                                          -

276

1

-

                                      -

1

277

Undeveloped

74

                                               -

6

14

                                          -

94

1

-

                                      -

1

95

At 31 December 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

199

                                               -

10

68

                                          -

278

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

278

Undeveloped

78

                                               -

                                        -

21

                                          -

100

1

-

                                      -

1

101

Net proved gas reserves in billion standard cubic feet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

11,227

312

191

946

                                          -

12,677

-

-

                                      -

                                                  -

12,677

Undeveloped

2,467

906

108

762

                                          -

4,242

-

-

                                      -

                                                  -

4,242

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

10,664

32

206

999

                                          -

11,901

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

11,901

Undeveloped

2,278

161

160

124

                                          -

2,723

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

2,723

At 31 December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

9,219

188

171

1,002

                                          -

10,580

4

-

                                      -

4

10,584

Undeveloped

3,617

                                               -

110

316

                                          -

4,043

11

-

                                      -

11

4,054

At 31 December 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

8,852

159

273

1,675

                                          -

10,958

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

10,958

Undeveloped

3,492

                                               -

37

577

                                          -

4,106

9

-

                                      -

9

4,115

Net proved oil, condensate, NGL and gas reserves in million barrels oil equivalent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 31 December 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

2,818

119

287

350

128

3,701

-

-

24

24

3,725

Undeveloped

826

295

78

303

102

1,603

-

-

32

32

1,635

At 31 December 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

2,641

53

294

386

119

3,494

                                            -

-

21

21

3,515

Undeveloped

1,173

57

64

156

70

1,521

                                            -

-

25

25

1,546

At 31 December 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

2,392

76

240

414

121

3,244

8

-

16

24

3,268

Undeveloped

1,357

28

47

191

55

1,678

54

-

13

68

1,746

At 31 December 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developed

2,290

83

231

619

118

3,342

                                            -

-

                                      -

                                                  -

3,342

Undeveloped

1,567

42

19

223

119

1,969

56

-

                                      -

56

2,025

2102Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


The conversion rates used are 1 standard cubic meter = 35.3 standard cubic feet, 1 standard cubic meter oil equivalent = 6.29 barrels of oil equivalent (boe) and 1,000 standard cubic meter gas = 1 standard cubic meter oil equivalent.

 

Capitalised cost related to oil and gas producing activities

Capitalised cost related to oil and gas producing activities

Capitalised cost related to oil and gas producing activities

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

At 31 December

At 31 December

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unproved properties

117.5

97.5

83.8

12,627

13,563

13,341

Proved properties, wells, plants and other equipment

1,327.1

1,178.8

984.1

173,954

159,284

150,653

 

 

Total capitalised cost

1,444.6

1,276.3

1,068.0

186,581

172,847

163,994

Accumulated depreciation, impairment and amortisation

(873.1)

(687.2)

(543.7)

(120,170)

(109,160)

(99,118)

 

 

Net capitalised cost

571.5

589.1

524.3

66,411

63,687

64,876

 

Net capitalised cost related to equity accounted investments as of 31 December 20152017 was NOK 8.8 billion, NOK 7.2 billionUSD 1,351 million, USD 2,000 million in 20142016 and NOK 5.9 billionUSD 1,000 million in

2013. 2015. The decrease is mainly caused by the reclassification of the 9,67% ownership share in the heavy oil project Petrocedeño in Venezuela from an equity accounted investment to a non-current financial investment as of 30 June 2017. The reported figures are based on capitalised costs within the upstream segments in Statoil, in line with the description below for result of operations for oil and gas producing activities.

 

Expenditures incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities

Expenditures incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities

Expenditures incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities

These expenditures include both amounts capitalised and expensed.

These expenditures include both amounts capitalised and expensed.

These expenditures include both amounts capitalised and expensed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2017

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenditures

472

223

77

199

264

1,235

Development costs

4,565

599

417

2,146

376

8,102

Acquired proved properties

0

333

0

32

0

365

Acquired unproved properties

1

13

0

122

726

862

 

 

 

 

Total

5,038

1,168

494

2,499

1,366

10,564

 

 

 

 

Full year 2016

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenditures

495

155

197

202

388

1,437

Development costs

5,245

661

780

1,705

413

8,804

Acquired proved properties

6

0

0

3

0

9

Acquired unproved properties

57

58

0

9

2,353

2,477

 

 

 

 

Total

5,803

874

977

1,919

3,154

12,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenditures

6.4

1.7

3.0

12.0

23.1

796

213

381

808

661

2,859

Development costs

47.1

11.4

10.5

29.0

98.1

5,863

1,420

1,315

3,069

531

12,198

Acquired proved properties

0.0

0.7

0.7

0

0

79

0

79

Acquired unproved properties

0.0

0.7

3.1

4.5

6

77

88

379

(4)

546

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

53.5

13.7

14.3

44.8

126.3

6,665

1,710

1,784

4,335

1,188

15,682

 

 

Full year 2014

 

 

Exploration expenditures

7.0

2.5

7.3

7.1

23.9

Development costs

52.2

13.4

13.3

22.7

101.7

Acquired proved properties

0.0

4.7

4.7

Acquired unproved properties

0.0

2.3

2.3

 

 

Total

59.3

15.9

20.6

36.8

132.5

 

 

Full year 2013

 

 

Exploration expenditures

7.9

3.8

2.7

7.4

21.8

Development costs

51.8

8.5

11.6

26.4

98.3

Acquired proved properties

2.2

0.0

2.2

Acquired unproved properties

0.0

0.4

0.0

1.8

2.2

 

 

Total

61.9

12.7

14.3

35.6

124.5

 

Expenditures incurred in development activities related to equity accounted investments was NOK 0.4 billionUSD 19 million in 2015, NOK 1.6 billion2017, USD 1,370 million in 20142016 and NOK 0.4 billionUSD 46 million in 2013.2015.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017211


 

Results of operation for oil and gas producing activities

As required by Topic 932, the revenues and expenses included in the following table reflect only those relating to the oil and gas producing operations of Statoil.

The result of operations for oil and gas producing activities contains the two upstream reporting segments Development andExploration & Production Norway (DPN)(E&P Norway) and Development andExploration & Production International (DPI)(E&P International) as presented in note 3 Segments.Segmentswithin the Consolidated financial statements. Production cost is based on operating

220Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


expenses related to production of oil and gas. From the operating expenses certain expenses such as; transportation costs, accruals for over/underlift position, royalty payments and diluent costs are excluded. These expenses and mainly upstream business administration are included as other expenses in the tables below. Other revenues mainly consist of gains and losses from sales of oil and gas interests and gains and losses from commodity based derivatives within the upstream segments.

Income tax expense is calculated on the basis of statutory tax rates adjusted for uplift and tax credits. No deductions are made for interest or other elements not included in the table below.

 

Consolidated companies

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

0.4

2.0

(0.6)

1.6

3.5

Transfers

140.1

3.8

27.7

22.2

193.9

Other revenues

(1.0)

12.3

0.0

0.1

11.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

139.5

18.2

27.2

23.9

208.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenses

(4.6)

(1.7)

(5.1)

(19.5)

(31.0)

Production costs

(21.1)

(1.3)

(5.4)

(6.4)

(34.2)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(51.4)

(6.4)

(20.1)

(55.1)

(133.0)

Other expenses

(4.7)

(1.3)

(1.9)

(11.1)

(19.0)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total costs

(81.9)

(10.7)

(32.6)

(92.0)

(217.2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations before tax

57.6

7.4

(5.4)

(68.2)

(8.5)

Tax expense

(38.8)

1.8

(5.4)

(0.2)

(42.6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations

18.8

9.2

(10.8)

(68.3)

(51.1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from equity accounted investments

0.0

0.3

0.0

(1.0)

(0.8)

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2014

 

 

Full year 2017

 

 

 

 

Sales

1.8

4.3

5.0

3.9

15.0

47

236

1,373

217

0

1,873

Transfers

172.6

6.1

32.6

28.6

239.9

17,578

518

3,345

2,375

944

24,759

Other revenues

7.7

5.7

0.7

(1.0)

13.1

(62)

53

3

186

(15)

164

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

182.1

16.1

38.3

31.4

268.1

17,563

806

4,721

2,778

928

26,796

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenses

(5.4)

(2.6)

(9.2)

(13.2)

(30.3)

(379)

(236)

(143)

25

(327)

(1,059)

Production costs

(23.0)

(1.5)

(4.6)

(5.3)

(34.4)

(2,213)

(157)

(523)

(457)

(259)

(3,610)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(40.0)

(4.9)

(14.1)

(37.9)

(96.9)

(3,874)

(426)

(1,910)

(1,664)

(423)

(8,297)

Other expenses

(2.2)

(1.2)

0.4

(10.6)

(13.6)

(742)

(123)

(18)

(680)

(594)

(2,156)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total costs

(70.5)

(10.1)

(27.5)

(67.0)

(175.2)

(7,207)

(941)

(2,595)

(2,776)

(1,603)

(15,122)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations before tax

111.6

6.0

10.9

(35.6)

92.9

10,356

(135)

2,126

3

(675)

11,674

Tax expense

(74.8)

(0.5)

(8.4)

(0.4)

(84.0)

(7,479)

179

(741)

1

(15)

(8,056)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations

36.8

5.5

2.5

(36.0)

8.8

2,877

44

1,385

3

(690)

3,619

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from equity accounted investments

(0.0)

1.0

0.0

(1.7)

(0.7)

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

129

13

0

10

0

151

2122Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Consolidated companies

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

57

161

305

241

(15)

749

Transfers

12,962

494

2,803

1,580

886

18,725

Other revenues

136

30

6

259

7

438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

13,155

685

3,114

2,080

878

19,912

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenses

(383)

(274)

(284)

(1,209)

(803)

(2,952)

Production costs

(2,129)

(148)

(629)

(330)

(333)

(3,569)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(5,698)

(130)

(2,181)

(2,354)

(845)

(11,208)

Other expenses

(417)

(81)

(89)

(906)

(415)

(1,908)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total costs

(8,627)

(633)

(3,183)

(4,799)

(2,395)

(19,637)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations before tax

4,528

52

(69)

(2,719)

(1,517)

275

Tax expense

(2,760)

272

(123)

0

(26)

(2,636)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations

1,768

324

(192)

(2,719)

(1,543)

(2,361)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

(78)

(86)

0

11

(25)

(178)

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    221213


 

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

Consolidated companies

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full year 2013

 

 

Full year 2015

 

 

 

 

Sales

0.3

4.0

3.9

4.1

12.3

50

257

(41)

204

(5)

464

Transfers

192.5

7.4

30.9

27.1

257.9

17,429

480

3,454

1,532

1,232

24,127

Other revenues

9.3

3.9

0.2

0.4

13.8

(143)

1,169

3

3

5

1,036

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

202.1

15.3

35.0

31.6

284.0

17,336

1,906

3,416

1,738

1,231

25,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration expenses

(5.5)

(3.4)

(1.6)

(7.5)

(18.0)

(576)

(190)

(630)

(2,114)

(362)

(3,872)

Production costs

(22.1)

(1.5)

(3.9)

(31.4)

(2,629)

(160)

(671)

(450)

(345)

(4,254)

Depreciation, amortisation and net impairment losses

(32.2)

(2.4)

(13.3)

(16.2)

(64.1)

(6,379)

(799)

(2,487)

(6,236)

(710)

(16,611)

Other expenses

(5.3)

(1.6)

(0.5)

(9.7)

(17.1)

(594)

(165)

(237)

(788)

(587)

(2,370)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total costs

(65.1)

(8.9)

(19.3)

(37.3)

(130.6)

(10,178)

(1,314)

(4,025)

(9,587)

(2,003)

(27,107)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations before tax

137.0

6.4

15.7

(5.7)

153.4

7,157

593

(609)

(7,850)

(772)

(1,481)

Tax expense

(90.9)

(2.0)

(8.1)

(1.0)

(102.0)

(4,824)

238

(717)

(0)

(21)

(5,324)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Results of operations

46.1

4.4

7.6

(6.7)

51.4

2,333

831

(1,326)

(7,850)

(793)

(6,805)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income from equity accounted investments

0.1

0.3

0.0

(0.3)

0.1

Net income/(loss) from equity accounted investments

3

32

0

0

(123)

(88)



 

Average production cost in NOK per boe based on entitlement volumes

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

47

79

61

62

52

2014

53

64

64

52

55

2013

50

53

59

46

51

Average production cost in USD per boe based on entitlement volumes (consolidated)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

5

9

6

5

12

5

2016

5

8

7

4

13

5

2015

6

10

8

6

13

6

 

Production cost per boe is calculated as the production costs in the result of operations table, divided by the produced entitlement volumes (mboe) for the corresponding period.

 

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves

The table below shows the standardised measure of future net cash flows relating to proved reserves. The analysis is computed in accordance with Topic 932, by applying average market prices as defined by the SEC, year end costs, year end statutory tax rates and a discount factor of 10% to year end quantities of net proved reserves. The standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows is a forward-looking statement.

 

Future price changes are limited to those provided by existing contractual arrangements at the end of each reporting year. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce year-end estimated proved reserves based on year-end cost indices, assuming continuation of year-end economic conditions. Pre-tax future net cash flow is net of decommissioning and removal costs. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying the appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future pretax net cash flows, less the tax basis of related assets. Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a discount rate of 10% per year. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimate of when future expenditures will be incurred and when reserves will be produced. The standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows prescribed under Topic 932 requires assumptions as to the timing and amount of future development and production costs and income from the production of proved reserves. The information does not represent management's estimate or Statoil's expected future cash flows or the value of its proved reserves and therefore should not be relied upon as an indication of Statoil's future cash flow or value of its proved reserves.

2222142   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

At 31 December 2015

 

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

At 31 December 2017

 

 

Consolidated companies

 

 

 

Future net cash inflows

 1,288.7  

 43.9  

 137.3  

 189.7  

 1,659.5  

150,953

6,144

11,504

24,085

10,301

202,987

Future development costs

 (156.1) 

 (10.8) 

 (10.7) 

 (41.5) 

 (219.0) 

(15,642)

(1,992)

(594)

(2,020)

(2,499)

(22,747)

Future production costs

 (441.5) 

 (22.2) 

 (54.9) 

 (102.6) 

 (621.3) 

(49,229)

(2,792)

(5,240)

(10,342)

(6,564)

(74,167)

Future income tax expenses

 (455.7) 

 (0.9) 

 (25.3) 

 (6.4) 

 (488.4) 

(58,774)

(288)

(1,456)

(3,962)

(333)

(64,813)

Future net cash flows

 235.4  

 9.9  

 46.3  

 39.2  

 330.8  

27,307

1,072

4,215

7,761

904

41,259

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

 (96.6) 

 (3.3) 

 (11.1) 

 (15.8) 

 (126.8) 

(10,152)

(315)

(874)

(2,925)

(331)

(14,596)

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows

 138.8  

 6.6  

 35.2  

 23.4  

 203.9  

17,155

757

3,341

4,836

573

26,663

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

 

 

 

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows

 0,0  

 1.1  

333

-

 -    

333

 

 

 

Total standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows including equity accounted investments

 138.8  

 6.6  

 35.2  

 24.5  

 205.1  

17,488

757

3,341

4,836

573

26,995

 

 

+

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

At 31 December 2014

 

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

At 31 December 2016

 

 

Consolidated companies

 

 

 

Future net cash inflows

 1,467.9  

 203.4  

 213.6  

 323.0  

 2,207.9  

120,355

4,032

10,644

14,452

5,582

155,065

Future development costs

 (166.8) 

 (59.9) 

 (12.3) 

 (51.7) 

 (290.8) 

(14,572)

(927)

(733)

(2,574)

(985)

(19,791)

Future production costs

 (439.8) 

 (91.6) 

 (58.3) 

 (142.7) 

 (732.4) 

(45,357)

(2,101)

(4,909)

(7,837)

(3,864)

(64,069)

Future income tax expenses

 (606.8) 

 (8.1) 

 (48.6) 

 (34.0) 

 (697.5) 

(36,268)

(127)

(1,492)

(1,287)

(68)

(39,243)

Future net cash flows

 254.5  

 43.8  

 94.4  

 94.6  

 487.3  

24,158

876

3,510

2,754

664

31,962

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

 (99.7) 

 (27.8) 

 (28.1) 

 (41.9) 

 (197.6) 

(8,729)

(241)

(646)

(1,019)

(236)

(10,870)

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows

 154.7  

 16.0  

 66.3  

 52.7  

 289.8  

15,429

635

2,864

1,735

429

21,092

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

 

 

 

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows

 0,0  

 5.1  

279

 -    

127

406

 

 

 

Total standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows including equity accounted investments

 154.7  

 16.0  

 66.3  

 57.8  

 294.8  

15,708

635

2,864

1,735

555

21,498

 

 

 

 

+

 

 

 

 

 

(in NOK billion)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

Americas

Total

At 31 December 2013

 

(in USD million)

Norway

Eurasia excluding Norway

Africa

US

Americas excluding US

Total

At 31 December 2015

 

 

Consolidated companies

 

 

 

 

Future net cash inflows

 1,700.2  

 273.7  

 205.2  

 257.5  

 2,436.6  

160,277

5,455

17,073

15,542

8,053

206,399

Future development costs

 (200.0) 

 (80.8) 

 (16.0) 

 (38.9) 

 (335.7) 

(19,409)

(1,345)

(1,330)

(3,362)

(1,796)

(27,242)

Future production costs

 (471.3) 

 (125.4) 

 (54.8) 

 (104.3) 

 (755.8) 

(54,911)

(2,765)

(6,832)

(7,844)

(4,919)

(77,271)

Future income tax expenses

 (740.9) 

 (12.2) 

 (50.0) 

 (24.0) 

 (827.1) 

(56,680)

(118)

(3,149)

(632)

(167)

(60,747)

Future net cash flows

 288.0  

 55.3  

 84.4  

 90.3  

 518.0  

29,276

1,226

5,762

3,704

1,171

41,139

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

 (120.8) 

 (39.7) 

 (27.6) 

 (41.3) 

 (229.4) 

(12,011)

(406)

(1,386)

(1,688)

(281)

(15,773)

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows

 167.2  

 15.6  

 56.8  

 49.0  

 288.6  

17,264

820

4,375

2,016

890

25,366

 

 

 

Equity accounted investments

 

 

 

Standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows

 0,0  

 4.8  

 -    

140

140

 

 

 

Total standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows including equity accounted investments

 167.2  

 15.6  

 56.8  

 53.8  

 293.4  

17,264

820

4,375

2,016

1,030

25,506

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    223215


 

Changes in the standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves

Changes in the standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves

Changes in the standardised measure of discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves

(in NOK billion)

2015

2014

2013

(in USD million)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated companies

 

 

 

Standardised measure at beginning of year

 289.8  

 288.6  

 252.8  

21,092

25,366

46,270

Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) costs related to future production

 (313.7) 

 (98.3) 

 (24.0) 

22,640

(21,148)

(71,817)

Changes in estimated future development costs

 (4.5) 

 (32.3) 

 (54.9) 

(5,572)

(16)

6,739

Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced during the period, net of production cost

 (168.0) 

 (232.6) 

 (243.2) 

(22,446)

(16,824)

(20,803)

Net change due to extensions, discoveries, and improved recovery

 30.1  

 23.1  

 10.6  

3,836

1,099

3,745

Net change due to purchases and sales of minerals in place

 (7.4) 

 (25.1) 

 (33.9) 

(167)

(566)

(1,026)

Net change due to revisions in quantity estimates

 76.4  

 126.1  

 126.5  

10,798

8,163

7,491

Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period

 84.6  

 99.6  

 95.1  

7,597

7,998

10,474

Accretion of discount

 71.0  

 77.3  

 81.4  

4,415

5,949

11,335

Net change in income taxes

 145.7  

 63.3  

 78.2  

(15,530)

11,070

32,958

 

 

Total change in the standardised measure during the year

 (85.8) 

 1.2  

 35.8  

5,571

(4,274)

(20,904)

 

 

Standardised measure at end of year

 203.9  

 289.8  

 288.6  

26,663

21,092

25,366

 

 

Equity accounted investments

 

 

Standardised measure at end of year

 1.1  

 5.1  

 4.8  

333

406

140

 

 

Standardised measure at end of year including equity accounted investments

 205.1  

 294.8  

 293.4  

26,995

21,498

25,506

 

In the table above, each line item presents the sources of changes in the standardised measure value on a discounted basis, with the accretion of discount line item reflecting the increase in the net discounted value of the proved oil and gas reserves due to the fact that the future cash flows are now one year closer in time.

28 Subsequent events

InThe standardised measure at the first quarter of 2016 Statoil acquired 11.93%beginning of the sharesyear represents the discounted net present value after deductions of both future development costs, production costs and votestaxes. The ‘Net change in Lundin Petroleum AB for a total purchasesales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) costs related to future production’ is, on the other hand, related to the future net cash flows at 31 December 2016. The proved reserves at 31 December 2016 were multiplied by the actual change in price, and change in unit of SEK 4.6 billion. The shares will be accounted for as a non-current financial investment (available-for-sale)production costs, to arrive at fair value.the net effect of changes in price and production costs. Development costs and taxes are reflected in the line items ‘Change in estimated future development costs’ and ‘Net change in income taxes’ and are not included in the ‘Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) costs related to future production’.

2242162   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

8.2 Report5.1 SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Statoil is the largest company listed on the Oslo Børs where it trades under the ticker code STL. Statoil is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker code STO, trading in the form of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm



8.2.1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmAmerican Depositary Shares (ADS).

 

ToStatoil's shares have been listed on the board of directorsOslo Børs and shareholders of Statoil ASAthe New York Stock Exchange since our initial public offering on 18 June 2001. The ADSs traded on the New York Stock Exchange are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADR), and each ADS represents one ordinary share.

 

Statoil Share

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareprice STL (low) (NOK)

136.00

97.90

116.30

120.00

123.00

Shareprice STL (average) (NOK)

152.98

133.50

137.59

166.41

136.72

Shareprice STL (high) (NOK)

176.90

159.80

160.80

194.80

147.70

Shareprice STL (year-end) (NOK)

175.20

158.40

123.70

131.20

147.00

Shareprice STO (low) (USD)

16.29

11.38

13.42

15.82

20.14

Shareprice STO (average) (USD)

18.50

15.92

17.11

26.52

23.32

Shareprice STO (high) (USD)

21.42

18.51

21.31

31.91

27.00

Shareprice STO (year-end) (USD)

21.42

18.24

13.96

17.61

24.13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STL Market value year-end (NOK billion)

582

514

394

418

469

STL Daily turnover (million shares)

3.14

4.7

5.1

3.7

3.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary shares outstanding, year-end

3,323,167,853

3,245,049,411

3,188,647,103

3,188,647,103

3,188,647,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Statoil ASA and subsidiaries as of 31 December 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Statoil ASA’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Statoil ASA and subsidiaries as of 31 December 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2015, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Statoil ASA’s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated 9 March 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Statoil ASA’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG AS

 

 

 

Trondheim, Norway

9 March 2016

As of 31 December 2017, Statoil represented 22.96% of the total value of all companies registered on the Oslo Børs, with a market value of NOK 582 billion. Total shareholder return (dividend reinvested) for 2017 is 16.0%.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    225217


 

8.2.2 ReportThe graph shows the development of KPMGthe Statoil share price compared to the oil price and the Oslo Børs Benchmark Index (OSEBX). The turnover of shares is a measure of traded volumes. On average, 3.14 million Statoil shares were traded on Statoil's internal control over financial reporting

Reportthe Oslo Børs every day in 2017 compared to 4.7 million shares in 2016. In 2017, Statoil shares accounted for 11,24% of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the board of directors and shareholders of Statoil ASAtotal market value traded throughout the year.

 

We have audited Statoil ASA’s internal control over financial reporting asASA has one class of shares, and each share confers one vote at the general meeting. Statoil ASA had 3,323,167,853ordinary shares outstanding at year end. As of 31 December 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).2017, Statoil ASA’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, includedhad 89,405 shareholders registered in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Statoil ASA’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.Norwegian Central Securities Depository (VPS), down from 91,128 shareholders at 31 December 2016.

 

We conducted our auditThe ticker code will be changed in accordanceconnection with the standardscompany’s proposed name change to Equinor.

Share prices

These are the reported high and low quotations at market closing for the ordinary shares on the Oslo Børs and New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated. They are derived from the Oslo Børs Daily Official List, and the highest and lowest sales prices of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control basedADSs as reported on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Statoil ASA maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on criteria established in New York Stock Exchange composite tape.Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Statoil ASA and subsidiaries as of 31 December 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 31 December 2015, and our report dated 9 March 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG AS

Trondheim, Norway
9 March 2016

2262182   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

NOK per ordinary share

 

USD per ADS

Share price

High

Low

 

High

Low

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended 31 December

 

 

 

 

 

2013

147.70

123.00

 

27.00

20.14

2014

194.80

120.00

 

31.91

15.82

2015

160.80

116.30

 

21.31

13.42

2016

159.80

97.90

 

18.51

11.38

2017

176.90

136.00

 

21.42

16.29

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter ended

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, March 31, 2016

135.50

97.90

 

16.01

11.38

Thursday, June 30, 2016

144.80

122.40

 

17.68

14.66

Friday, September 30, 2016

149.80

124.00

 

17.74

15.07

Friday, December 30, 2016

159.80

129.30

 

18.51

15.86

Friday, March 31, 2017

162.90

142.30

 

19.21

16.83

Friday, June 30, 2017

153.60

138.40

 

18.28

16.29

Friday, September 30, 2017

160.20

136.00

 

20.37

16.32

Friday, December 29, 2017

176.90

158.20

 

21.42

19.81

Up until March 14, 2018

187.30

172.25

 

24.26

21.51

 

 

 

 

 

 

Month of

 

 

 

 

 

September 2017

160.20

147.50

 

20.37

18.96

October 2017

167.90

158.20

 

20.54

19.88

November 2017

170.80

164.00

 

21.01

19.81

December 2017

176.90

165.40

 

21.42

19.95

January 2018

187.30

177.45

 

24.26

22.00

February 2018

182.60

172.25

 

23.83

21.51

Up until March 14, 2018

182.10

174.90

 

23.20

22.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend policy and dividends

It is Statoil's ambition to grow the annual cash dividend measured in USD per share in line with long-term underlying earnings.

Statoil’s board approves first, second and third quarter interim dividends, based on an authorisation from the annual general meeting (AGM), while the AGM approves the fourth quarter dividend and implicitly the total annual dividend based on a proposal from the board. It is Statoil’s intention to pay quarterly dividends, although when deciding the interim dividends and recommending the total annual dividend level, the board will take into consideration expected cash flow, capital expenditure plans, financing requirements and appropriate financial flexibility.

In addition to cash dividend, Statoil might buy back shares as part of total distribution of capital to the shareholders. The shareholders at the AGM may vote to reduce, but may not increase, the fourth quarter dividend proposed by the board of directors. Statoil announces dividend payments in connection with quarterly results. Payment of quarterly dividends is expected to take place within six months after the announcement of each quarterly dividend.

The board of directors has proposed to the AGM a dividend of USD 0.23 per share for the fourth quarter 2017 which is an increase from the previous quarter.

The following table shows the cash dividend amounts to all shareholders since 2013 on a per share basis and in aggregate.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017219


 

 

Ordinary dividend per share

 

 

Ordinary dividend per share

Fiscal year

Curr.

Q1

 

Curr.

Q2

 

Curr.

Q3

 

Curr.

Q4

 

Curr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOK

7.0000

2014

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

7.2000

2015

NOK

1.8000

 

NOK

-

 

NOK

-

 

NOK

-

 

NOK

1.8000

2015

USD

-

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.6603

2016

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.8804

2017

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2201

 

USD

0.2300

 

USD

0.8903

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The proposed fourth quarter 2017 dividend will be considered at the annual general meeting 15 May 2018. The Statoil share will be traded ex dividend 16 May 2018 and the dividend will be disbursed around 30 May 2018. For US ADR holders, the ex-dividend date will be 16 May 2018 and expected payment will be 31 May 2018.

Dividends in NOK per share will be calculated and communicated four business days after record date for shareholders at Oslo Børs. The NOK dividend will be based on average USD/NOK fixing rates from Norges Bank in the period plus/minus three business days from record date, in total seven business dates.

Share repurchase

For the period 2013-2017, the board of directors was authorised by the annual general meeting of Statoil to repurchase Statoil shares in the market for subsequent annulment. Statoil has not undertaken any share repurchase based on this authorisation.

It is Statoil’s intention to renew this authorisation at the annual general meeting in May 2018.

2202Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Shares purchased by issuer

Shares are acquired in the market for transfer to employees under the share savings scheme in accordance with the limits set by the board of directors. No shares were repurchased in the market for the purpose of subsequent annulment in 2017.

Statoil's share savings plan

Since 2004, Statoil has had a share savings plan for employees of the company. The purpose of this plan is to strengthen the business culture and encourage loyalty through employees becoming part-owners of the company.

Through regular salary deductions, employees can invest up to 5% of their base salary in Statoil shares. In addition, the company contributes 20% of the total share investment made by employees in Norway, up to a maximum of NOK 1,500 per year (approximately USD 170). This company contribution is a tax-free employee benefit under current Norwegian tax legislation. After a lock-in period of two calendar years, one extra share will be awarded for each share purchased. Under current Norwegian tax legislation, the share award is a taxable employee benefit, with a value equal to the value of the shares and taxed at the time of the award.

The board of directors is authorised to acquire Statoil shares in the market on behalf of the company. The authorization is valid until the next annual general meeting, but not beyond 30 June 2019. This authorisation replaces the previous authorisation to acquire Statoil's own shares for implementation of the share savings plan granted by the annual general meeting 11 May 2017. It is Statoil’s intention to renew this authorisation at the annual general meeting.

Period in which shares were repurchased

Number of shares repurchased

Average price per share in NOK

Total number of shares purchased as part of programme

Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programme authorisation

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jan-17

520,716

162.6375

4,957,941

9,042,059

Feb-17

577,674

147.8341

5,535,615

8,464,385

Mar-17

577,538

148.0420

6,113,153

7,886,847

Apr-17

574,983

148.7173

6,688,136

7,311,864

May-17

558,248

153.3188

7,246,384

6,753,616

Jun-17

594,701

143.6520

594,701

13,405,299

Jul-17

605,735

140.7709

1,200,436

12,799,564

Aug-17

584,442

145.6774

1,784,878

12,215,122

Sep-17

557,325

152.8641

2,342,203

11,657,797

Oct-17

532,356

160.2311

2,874,559

11,125,441

Nov-17

519,650

164.2834

3,394,209

10,605,791

Dec-17

512,546

166.8531

3,906,755

10,093,245

Jan-18

493,678

185.7484

4,400,433

9,599,567

Feb-18

530,143

174.6695

4,930,576

9,069,424

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 7,739,735 1)

 156.8071 2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

All shares repurchased have been purchased in the open market and pursuant to the authorisation mentioned above.

2)

Weighted average price per share.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017221


Statoil ADR programme fees

Fees and charges payable by a holder of ADSs.

As depositary from 31 January 2013, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas collects its fees for the delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects fees from investors by deducting the fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The depositary may refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.

The charges of the depositary payable by investors are as follows:

Persons depositing or withdrawing shares must pay:

For:

USD 5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs)

Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property

Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates

USD 0.02(or less) per ADS, subject to the company's consent

Any cash distribution made made pursuant to the Deposit Agreement

USD 0.05 (or less) per ADS, subject to the company's consent

For the operation and maintenance costs in administering the ADR programme

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs

Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered holders

Registration or transfer fees

Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares

Expenses of the Depositary

Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (as provided in the deposit agreement)

Converting foreign currency to USD

Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes

As necessary

Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities

As necessary

Reimbursements and payments made and fee waivers granted by the depositary

The depositary has agreed to reimburse certain company expenses related to the company's ADR programme and incurred by the company in connection with the programme. In the year ended 31 December 2017, the depositary reimbursed approximately USD 2.978 million to the company in relation to certain expenses including investor relations expenses, expenses related to the maintenance of the ADR programme, legal counsel fees, printing and ADR certificates. In addition, 2017 was the first year Statoil claimed dividend fee proceeds which is included here.

The depositary has also agreed to waive fees for costs associated with the administration of the ADR programme, and it has paid certain expenses directly to third parties on behalf of the company. The expenses paid to third parties include expenses relating to reporting services, access charges to its online platform, re-registration costs borne by the custodian and costs in relation to printing and mailing AGM materials. For the year ended 31 December 2017, the depositary paid expenses of approximately USD 211,635 directly to third parties.

2222Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


TAXATION

This section describes the material Norwegian tax consequences that apply to shareholders resident in Norway and to non-resident shareholders in connection with the acquisition, ownership and disposal of shares and American Depositary Shares (ADS). The term “shareholder” refers to both holders of shares and holders of ADSs, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

Norwegian tax matters

The outline does not provide a complete description of all tax regulations that might be relevant (i.e. for investors to whom special regulations may be applicable), and is based on current law and practice. Shareholders should consult their professional tax adviser for advice about individual tax consequences.

Taxation of dividends received by Norwegian shareholders

Corporate shareholders (i.e. limited liability companies and similar entities) residing in Norway for tax purposes are generally subject to tax in Norway on dividends received from Norwegian companies. The basis for taxation is 3% of the dividends received, which is subject to the standard income tax rate. The standard income tax rate has been reduced from 24% in 2017 to 23% in 2018.

Individual shareholders resident in Norway for tax purposes are subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 24% in 2017 to 23% in 2018) in Norway for dividend income exceeding a basic tax free allowance. However, in 2018 dividend income exceeding the basic tax free allowance is grossed up with a factor of 1.33 before included in the ordinary taxable income, resulting in an effective tax rate of 30.59% (23% x 1.33). The tax free allowance is computed for each individual share or ADS and corresponds as a rule to the cost price of that share or ADS multiplied by an annual risk-free interest rate. Any part of the calculated allowance for one year that exceeds the dividend distributed for the share or ADS ("unused allowance") may be carried forward and set off against future dividends received for (or gains upon the realisation of, see below) the same share or ADS. Any unused allowance will also be added to the basis for computation of the allowance for the same share or ADS the following year.

Taxation of dividends received by foreign shareholders

Non-resident shareholders are as a starting point subject to Norwegian withholding tax at a rate of 25% on dividends distributed by Norwegian companies. It is the responsibility of the distributing company to deduct the withholding tax when dividends are paid to non-resident shareholders.

Corporate shareholders that carry on business activities in Norway, and whose shares or ADSs are effectively connected with such activities are not subject to withholding tax. For such shareholders, 3% of the received dividends are subject to the standard income tax rate (reduced from 24% in 2017 to 23% in 2018).

Certain important exceptions and modifications are outlined below.

This withholding tax does not apply to corporate shareholders in the EEA area that are equal to Norwegian private or public limited liability companies or certain other types of Norwegian entities, and that are further able to demonstrate that they are genuinely established and carry on genuine economic business activity within the EEA area, provided that Norway is entitled to receive information from the state of residence pursuant to a tax treaty or other international treaty. If no such treaty exists with the state of residence, the shareholder may instead present confirmation issued by the tax authorities of the state of residence verifying the documentation.

The withholding rate of 25% is often reduced in tax treaties between Norway and other countries. The reduced withholding tax rate will generally only apply to dividends paid on shares held by shareholders who are able to properly demonstrate that they are the beneficial owner and entitled to the benefits of the tax treaty.

Individual shareholders resident for tax purposes in the EEA area may apply to the Norwegian tax authorities for a refund if the tax withheld by the distributing company exceeds the tax that would have been levied on individual shareholders resident in Norway.

Procedure for claiming a reduced withholding tax rate on dividends

A foreign shareholder that is entitled to a reduced withholding tax rate on dividends, may request that the reduced rate is applied at source by the distributor. Such request must be accompanied by satisfactory documentation which supports that the foreign shareholder is entitled to a reduced withholding tax rate.  It is expected that specific documentation requirements soon will be implemented in the regulations to the Norwegian Tax Payment Act, and the Norwegian Ministry of Finance has stated that these requirements should apply from 1 January 2019.

For holders of shares and ADSs deposited with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (Deutsche Bank), documentation establishing that the holder is eligible for the benefits under a tax treaty with Norway, may be provided to Deutsche Bank. Deutsche Bank has been granted permission by the Norwegian tax authorities to receive dividends from us for redistribution to a beneficial owner of shares and ADSs at the applicable treaty withholding rate.

Dividends paid to shareholders (either directly or through a depositary) who have not provided the relevant documentation to the relevant party that they are eligible for the reduced rate, will be subject to withholding tax of 25%. The beneficial owners will in this case have to apply to the Central Office - Foreign Tax Affairs for a refund of the excess amount of tax withheld. Please refer to the tax authorities’ web page for more information and the requirements of such application: http://www.skatteetaten.no/en/person/Aksjer-og-verdipapirer/withholding-tax-refund-on-dividends/

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017223


 

.

Taxation on the realisation of shares and ADSs

Corporate shareholders resident in Norway for tax purposes are not subject to tax in Norway on gains derived from the sale, redemption or other disposal of shares or ADSs in Norwegian companies. Capital losses are not deductible.

Individual shareholders residing in Norway for tax purposes are subject to tax in Norway on the sale, redemption or other disposal of shares or ADSs. Gains or losses in connection with such realisation are included in the individual's ordinary taxable income in the year of disposal, which is subject to the standard income tax rate, being reduced from 24% in 2017 to 23% in 2018. However, in 2018 the taxable gain or deductible loss is grossed up with a factor of 1.33 before included in the ordinary taxable income, resulting in an effective tax rate of 30.59% (23% x 1.33).

The taxable gain or deductible loss (before gross up) is calculated as the sales price adjusted for transaction expenses minus the taxable basis. A shareholder's tax basis is normally equal to the acquisition cost of the shares or ADSs. Any unused allowance pertaining to a share may be deducted from a taxable gain on the same share or ADS, but may not lead to or increase a deductible loss. Furthermore, any unused allowance may not be set off against gains from the realisation of the other shares or ADSs.

If the shareholder disposes of shares or ADSs acquired at different times, the shares or ADSs that were first acquired will be deemed to be first sold (the "FIFO" principle) when calculating gain or loss for tax purposes.

From 2017, individual shareholders may hold listed shares in companies resident within EEA through a stock savings account. If the conditions for the stock savings account are met, taxable gain or loss on shares owned through the stock savings account will be payable when the gain is withdrawn from the account whereas loss on shares will be deductible when the account is terminated. Dividends are not comprised by the stock savings account scheme and will thus be taxed pursuant to the ordinary rules described above.

A corporate shareholder or an individual shareholder who ceases to be tax resident in Norway due to Norwegian law or tax treaty provisions may, in certain circumstances, become subject to Norwegian exit taxation on capital gains related to shares or ADSs.

Shareholders not residing in Norway are generally not subject to tax in Norway on capital gains, and losses are not deductible on the sale, redemption or other disposal of shares or ADSs in Norwegian companies, unless the shareholder carries on business activities in Norway and such shares or ADSs are or have been effectively connected with such activities.

Wealth tax

The shares or ADSs are included in the basis for the computation of wealth tax imposed on individuals resident in Norway for tax purposes. Norwegian limited companies and certain similar entities are not subject to wealth tax. The current marginal wealth tax rate is 0.85% of the value assessed. The assessment value of listed shares (including ADSs) is 80% (reduced from 90% with effect from and including the income year 2018) of the listed value of such shares or ADSs on 1 January in the assessment year.

Non-resident shareholders are not subject to wealth tax in Norway for shares and ADSs in Norwegian limited companies unless the shareholder is an individual and the shareholding is effectively connected with the individual's business activities in Norway.

Inheritance tax and gift tax

No inheritance or gift tax is imposed in Norway.

Transfer tax

No transfer tax is imposed in Norway in connection with the sale or purchase of shares or ADSs.

United States tax matters

This section describes the material United States federal income tax consequences for US holders (as defined below) of owning shares or ADSs. It only applies to you if you hold your shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes and are not a member of a special class of holders subject to special rules, including dealers in securities, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings, insurance companies, partnerships, persons liable for the alternative minimum tax, persons that actually or constructively own 10% of the combined power of voting stock of Statoil or of the total value of stock of Statoil, persons that hold shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction, persons that purchase or sell shares or ADSs as part of wash sale for tax purposes,  or persons whose functional currency is not USD.

This section is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions, and the Convention between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Property (the ''Treaty''). These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. In addition, this section is based in part upon the representations of the depositary and the assumption that each obligation in the deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. For United States federal income tax purposes, if you hold ADRs evidencing ADSs, you will generally be treated as the owner of the ordinary shares represented by those ADRs. Exchanges of shares for ADRs and ADRs for shares will not generally be subject to United States federal income tax.


A ''US holder'' is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs that is: (i) a citizen or resident of the United States; (ii) a United States domestic corporation; (iii) an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or (iv) a trust if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust's administration and one or more United States persons are authorised to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

You should consult your own tax adviser regarding the United States federal, state and local and Norwegian and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of shares and ADSs in your particular circumstances.

Taxation of dividends

The gross amount of any dividend (including any Norwegian tax withheld from the dividend payment) paid by Statoil out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes) is taxable for you when you, in the case of shares, or the depositary, in the case of ADSs, receive the dividend, actually or constructively. If you are a non-corporate US holder, dividends paid to you will be eligible to be taxed at the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains as long as, in the year that you receive the dividend, the shares or ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States or Statoil is eligible for benefits under the Treaty. To qualify for the preferential rates, you must hold the shares or ADSs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet certain other requirements. The dividend will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to United States corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations.

The amount of the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a US holder will be the value in USD of the payments made in NOK determined at the spot NOK/USD rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether or not the payment is in fact converted into USD. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in the shares or ADSs and, to the extent in excess of your tax basis, will be treated as capital gain.

Subject to certain limitations, the 15% Norwegian tax withheld in accordance with the Treaty and paid to Norway will be creditable or deductible against your United States federal income tax liability, unless a refund of the tax withheld is available to you under Norwegian law. Special rules apply when determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the preferential rates. Dividends will be income from sources outside the United States and will generally, depending on your circumstances, be either ''passive'' or ''general'' income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to you. Any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange rate fluctuations during the period from the date you include the dividend payment in income until the date you convert the payment into USD will generally be treated as US-source ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate.

Taxation of capital gains

If you sell or otherwise dispose of your shares or ADSs, you will generally recognise a capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the value in USD of the amount that you realise and your tax basis, determined in USD, in your shares or ADSs. A capital gain of a non-corporate US holder is generally taxed at preferential rates if the property is held for more than one year. The gain or loss will generally be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. If you receive any foreign currency on the sale of shares or ADSs, you may recognise ordinary income or loss from sources within the United States as a result of currency fluctuations between the date of the sale of the shares or ADSs and the date the sales proceeds are converted into USD. You should consult your own tax adviser regarding how to account for payments made or received in a currency other than USD.

PFIC rules

We believe that the shares and ADSs should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If we were to be treated as a PFIC, a gain realised on the sale or other disposition of the shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as a capital gain. Instead, unless you elect to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the shares or ADSs, you would be treated as if you had realised such gain and certain "excess distributions" ratably over your holding period for the shares or ADSs. Amounts allocated to the year in which the gain is realised or the “excess distribution” is received or to a taxable year before we were classified as a PFIC would be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates, and amounts allocated to all other years would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain or distribution was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. With certain exceptions, your shares or ADSs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if we were a PFIC at any time during the period you held the shares or ADSs. Dividends that you receive from us will not be eligible for the preferential tax rates if we are treated as a PFIC with respect to you, either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but will instead be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Withholding

A 30% withholding tax will be imposed on certain payments to certain non-US financial institutions that fail to comply with information reporting requirements or certification requirements in respect of their direct and indirect United States shareholders and/or United States accountholders. To avoid becoming subject to the 30% withholding tax on payments to them, we and other non-US financial institutions may be required to report information to the IRS regarding the holders of shares or ADSs and to withhold on a portion of payments under the shares or ADSs to certain holders that fail to comply with the relevant information reporting requirements (or hold shares or ADSs directly or indirectly through certain non-compliant intermediaries). However, such withholding will not apply to payments made before January 1, 2019. The rules for the

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017225


implementation of this legislation have not yet been fully finalised, so it is impossible to determine at this time what impact, if any, this legislation will have on holders of the shares and ADSs.

2262Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


EXCHANGE RATES

The table below shows the high, low, average and end-of-period exchange rates for the Norwegian krone for USD 1.00 as announced by Norges Bank (Norway's central bank).

The average is computed using the monthly average exchange rates announced by Norges Bank during the period indicated.

For the year ended 31 December

Low

High

Average

End of Period

 

 

 

 

 

2013

5.4438

6.2154

5.8753

6.0837

2014

5.8611

7.6111

6.3011

7.4332

2015

7.3593

8.8090

8.0637

8.8090

2016

7.9766

8.9578

8.4014

8.6200

2017

7.7121

8.6781

8.2712

8.2050



 

Low

High

 

 

 

2017

 

 

September

7.7192

7.9726

October

7.8906

8.2161

November

8.1140

8.3043

December

8.2050

8.4103

 

 

 

2018

 

 

January

7.6760

8.1055

February

7.6579

7.9836

March (up to and including 14 March 2018)

7.7393

7.9369

On 14March 2018, the exchange rate announced by the Norges Bank for the Norwegian krone was USD 1.00 = NOK 7.7393

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the NOK and USD will affect the amounts in USD received by holders of American Depositary Shares (ADSs) on the conversion of dividends, if any, paid in Norwegian kroner on the ordinary shares, and they may affect the USD price of the ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange.

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017227


MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The Norwegian State is the largest shareholder in Statoil, with a direct ownership interest of 67%. Its ownership interest is managed by the Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.



Pursuant to the exchange ratio agreed in connection with the merger with Hydro's oil and gas activities, the State's ownership interest in the merged company was 62.5%, or 1,992,959,739 shares, on 1 October 2007. In accordance with the Norwegian parliament's decision of 2001 concerning a minimum state shareholding in Statoil of two-thirds, the Government built up the State's ownership interest in Statoil by buying shares in the market during the period from June 2008 to March 2009. In March 2009, the Government announced that the State's direct ownership interest had reached 67% and the Government's direct purchase of Statoil shares was completed.

As of 31 December2017, the Norwegian State had a 67% direct ownership interest in Statoil and a 3.30% indirect interest through the National Insurance Fund (Folketrygdfondet), totaling 70.30%. See note 17 Shareholder’s equity and dividends regarding the Norwegian State and the scrip option.

Statoil has one class of shares, and each share confers one vote at the general meeting. The Norwegian State does not have any voting rights that differ from the rights of other ordinary shareholders. Pursuant to the Norwegian Public Limited Liability Companies Act, a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes cast as well as of the votes represented at a general meeting is required to amend our articles of association. As long as the Norwegian State owns more than one-third of our shares, it will be able to prevent any amendments to our articles of association. Since the Norwegian State, acting through the Norwegian Minister of Petroleum and Energy, has in excess of two-thirds of the shares in the company, it has sole power to amend our articles of association. In addition, as majority shareholder, the Norwegian State has the power to control any decision at general meetings of our shareholders that requires a majority vote, including the election of the majority of the corporate assembly, which has the power to elect our board of directors and approve the dividend proposed by the board of directors.

The Norwegian State endorses the principles set out in "The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance", and it has stated that it expects companies in which the State has ownership interests to adhere to the code. The principle of ensuring equal treatment of different groups of shareholders is a key element in the State's own guidelines. In companies in which the State is a shareholder together with others, the State wishes to exercise the same rights and obligations as any other shareholder and not act in a manner that has a detrimental effect on the rights or financial interests of other shareholders. In addition to the principle of equal treatment of shareholders, emphasis is also placed on transparency in relation to the State's ownership and on the general meeting being the correct arena for owner decisions and formal resolutions.

2282Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Shareholders at December 2017

Number of Shares

Ownership in %

 

 

 

 

1

Government of Norway

2,226,522,461

67.00%

2

Folketrygdfondet

109,611,652

3.30%

3

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.

38,778,958

1.17%

4

Dodge & Cox

37,602,850

1.13%

5

Lazard Asset Management, L.L.C.

31,942,660

0.96%

6

Fidelity Management & Research Company

29,861,026

0.90%

7

INVESCO Asset Management Limited

28,939,947

0.87%

8

SAFE Investment Company Limited

25,560,235

0.77%

9

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

24,773,677

0.75%

10

KLP Forsikring

17,764,920

0.53%

11

Storebrand Kapitalforvaltning AS

17,202,662

0.52%

12

State Street Global Advisors (US)

16,814,356

0.51%

13

DNB Asset Management AS

14,656,121

0.44%

14

UBS Asset Management (UK) Ltd.

12,027,810

0.36%

15

Northern Cross LLC

11,606,485

0.35%

16

Epoch Investment Partners, Inc.

10,856,350

0.33%

17

Allianz Global Investors GmbH

8,893,846

0.27%

18

Renaissance Technologies LLC

8,454,901

0.25%

19

FMR Investment Management (U.K.) Limited

8,173,719

0.25%

20

AXA Investment Managers UK Ltd.

7,921,254

0.24%

 

 

 

 

Source: Data collected by third party, authorised by Statoil, December 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND LIMITATIONS

Under Norwegian foreign exchange controls currently in effect, transfers of capital to and from Norway are not subject to prior government approval. An exception applies to the physical transfer of payments in currency exceeding certain thresholds, which must be declared to the Norwegian custom authorities. This means that non-Norwegian resident shareholders may receive dividend payments without Norwegian exchange control consent as long as the payment is made through a licensed bank or other licensed payment institution.

There are no restrictions affecting the rights of non-Norwegian residents or foreign owners to hold or vote for our shares.

5.2 USE AND RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Since 2007, Statoil has been preparing the Consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European union (EU) and as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The IFRS standards have been applied consistently to all periods presented in the 2017 Consolidated financial statements.

Statoil is subject to SEC regulations regarding the use of non-GAAP financial measures in public disclosures. Non-GAAP financial measures are defined as numerical measures that either exclude or include amounts that are not excluded or included in the comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The following financial measures may be considered non-GAAP financial measures:

a)Net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments and Net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted

b)Return on average capital employed (ROACE)

c)Organic capital expenditures

d)Free cash flow

e)Adjusted earnings after tax

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017229


a) Net debt to capital employed ratio

In Statoil's view, the calculated net debt to capital employed ratio before adjustments and net debt to capital employed ratio adjusted gives an alternative picture of the current debt situation than gross interest-bearing financial debt.

The calculation is based on gross interest bearing financial debt in the balance sheet and adjusted for cash, cash equivalents and current financial investments. Certain adjustments are made, e.g. collateral deposits classified as cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated balance sheet are considered non-cash in the non-GAAP calculations. The financial investments held in Statoil Forsikring AS are excluded in the non-GAAP calculations as they are deemed restricted. These two adjustments increase net debt and give a more prudent definition of the net debt to capital employed ratio than if the IFRS based definition was to be used. Similarly, certain net interest-bearing debts incurred from activities pursuant to the Owners Instruction from the Norwegian State are set off against receivables on the Norwegian State's direct financial interest (SDFI). Net interest-bearing debt adjusted for these items is included in the average capital employed. The table below reconciles the net interest-bearing debt adjusted, the capital employed and the net debt to capital employed adjusted ratio with the most directly comparable financial measure or measures calculated in accordance with IFRS.

 

 

For the year ended 31 December

Calculation of capital employed and net debt to capital employed ratio

2017

2016

2015

(in USD million, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

39,861

35,072

40,271

Non-controlling interests

24

27

36

 

 

 

 

 

Total equity (A)

39,885

35,099

40,307

 

 

 

 

 

Current finance debt

4,091

3,674

2,326

Non-current finance debt

24,183

27,999

29,965

 

 

 

 

 

Gross interest-bearing debt (B)

28,274

31,673

32,291

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

4,390

5,090

8,623

Current financial investments

8,448

8,211

9,817

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents and current financial investment (C)

12,837

13,301

18,440

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest-bearing debt before adjustments (B1) (B-C)

15,437

18,372

13,852

 

 

 

 

 

Other interest-bearing elements 1)

1,014

1,216

1,111

Marketing instruction adjustment 2)

(164)

(199)

(214)

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest-bearing debt adjusted (B2)

16,287

19,389

14,748

 

 

 

 

 

Calculation of capital employed:

 

 

 

Capital employed before adjustments to net interest-bearing debt (A+B1)

55,322

53,471

54,159

Capital employed adjusted (A+B2)

56,172

54,488

55,055

 

 

 

 

 

Calculated net debt to capital employed:

 

 

 

Net debt to capital employed before adjustments (B1/(A+B1)

27.9%

34.4%

25.6%

Net debt to capital employed adjusted (B2/(A+B2)

29.0%

35.6%

26.8%

 

 

 

 

 

1)

Other interest-bearing elements are cash and cash equivalents adjustments regarding collateral deposits classified as cash and cash

equivalents in the Consolidated balance sheet but considered as non-cash in the non-GAAP calculations as well as financial investments in Statoil Forsikring AS classified as current financial investments.

2)

Marketing instruction adjustment is an adjustment to gross interest-bearing financial debt due to the SDFI part of the financial lease in the Snøhvit vessels that are included in Statoil's Consolidated balance sheet.

2302Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


b) Return on average capital employed (ROACE)

This measure provides useful information for both the group and investors about performance during the period under evaluation. Statoil uses ROACE to measure the return on capital employed, regardless of whether the financing is through equity or debtThe use of ROACE should not be viewed as an alternative to income before financial items, income taxes and minority interest, or to net income, which are measures calculated in accordance with GAAP or ratios based on these figures. ROACE was 8.2% in 2017, compared to negative 0.4% in 2016 and 4.1% in 2015. The change from 2016 is due to an increase in adjusted earnings after tax.

Calculated ROACE based on Adjusted earnings after tax and capital employed adjusted

For the year ended 31 December

(in USD million, except percentages)

2017

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted earnings after tax (A)

4,528

(208)

2,465

 

 

 

 

Average capital employed adjusted (B)

55,330

54,772

59,712

 

 

 

 

Calculated ROACE based on Adjusted earnings after tax and capital employed adjusted (A/B)

8.2%

-0.4%

4.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

c) Organic capital expenditures

Organic capital expenditures are capital expenditures excluding acquisitions, capital leases and other investments with significant different cash flow pattern. In 2017, a total of USD 1.4 billion were excluded from the organic capital expenditures. Among items excluded from the organic capital expenditure in 2017 were signature bonus for the Carcara North production sharing contract in Brazil, acquisition cost for a 10% stake in the BM-S-8 licence in Brazil and bonus for the extension of the Azeri-Chirag-Deepwater Gunashli (ACG) Production Sharing Agreement in Azerbaijan.

In 2016, a total of USD 4.0 billion were excluded from the organic capital expenditures. Among items excluded from the organic capital expenditure in 2016 were investment in ownership in Lundin Petroleum AB, acquisition of a 66% operated interest in the offshore licence BM-S-8 in Brazil and acquisition of a 50% stake in the Arkona offshore wind farm in Germany.

For more information, see note 3 Segment, line item Additions to PP&E, intangibles and equity accounted investments and, note 4 Acquisitions and divestments to the Consolidated financial statements.

d) Free cash flow

Free cash flow includes the following line items in the Consolidated statement of cash flows: Cash flows provided by operating activities before taxes paid and working capital items, taxes paid, capital expenditures and investments, (increase) decrease in other items interest bearing, proceeds from sale of assets and businesses and dividend paid.

e) Adjusted earnings after tax

Adjusted earnings are based on net operating income and adjusts for certain items affecting the income for the period in order to separate out effects that management considers may not be well correlated to Statoil's underlying operational performance in the individual reporting period. Management considers adjusted earnings to be a supplemental measure to Statoil's IFRS measures that provides an indication of Statoil's underlying operational performance in the period and facilitates an alternative understanding of operational trends between the periods, and uses this metric in determining variable remuneration and awards of LTI grants to members of the corporate executive committee. Adjusted earnings adjust for the following items:

·Certain gas contracts are, due to pricing or delivery conditions, deemed to contain embedded derivatives, required to be carried at fair value. Certain transactions related to historical divestments include contingent consideration, carried at fair value. The accounting impacts of changes in fair value of the aforementioned are excluded from adjusted earnings. In addition, adjustments are also made for changes in the unrealised fair value of derivativesrelated to some natural gas trading contracts. Due to the nature of these gas sales contracts, these are classified as financial derivatives to be measured at fair value at the balance sheet date. Unrealised gains and losses on these contracts reflect the value of the difference between current market gas prices and the actual prices to be realised under the gas sales contracts. Only realised gains and losses on these contracts are reflected in adjusted earnings. This presentation best reflects the underlying performance of the business as it replaces the effect of temporary timing differences associated with the re-measurements of the derivatives to fair value at the balance sheet date with actual realised gains and losses for the period

·Periodisation of inventory hedging effect: Commercial storage is hedged in the paper market. Commercial storage is accounted for by using the lower of cost and market price. If market prices increase above cost price, there will be a loss in the IFRS income statement since the derivatives always reflect changes in the market price. An adjustment is made to reflect the unrealised market value of the commercial storage. As a result, loss on derivatives is matched by a similar adjustment for the exposure being managed. If market prices decrease below cost price, the write-down and the derivative effect in the IFRS income statement will offset each other and no adjustment is made

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017231


·Over/underlift is accounted for using the sales method and therefore revenues are reflected in the period the product is sold rather than in the period it is produced. The over/underlift position depends on a number of factors related to our lifting programme and the way it corresponds to our entitlement share of production. The effect on income for the period is therefore adjusted, to show estimated revenues and associated costs based upon the production for the period which management believes reflects operational performance and increase comparability with peers

·Statoil holdsoperational storagewhich is not hedged in the paper market due to inventory strategies. Cost of goods sold is measured based on the FIFO (first-in, first-out) method, and includes realised gains or losses that arise due to changes in market prices. These gains or losses will fluctuate from one period to another and are not considered part of the underlying operations for the period

·Impairment and reversal of impairmentare excluded from adjusted earnings since they affect the economics of an asset for the lifetime of that asset; not only the period in which it is impaired or the impairment is reversed. Impairment and reversal of impairment can impact both the exploration expenses and the depreciation, amortisation and impairment line items

·Gain or loss from sales of assets is eliminated from the measure since the gain or loss does not give an indication of future performance or periodic performance; such a gain or loss is related to the cumulative value creation from the time the asset is acquired until it is sold

·Internal unrealised profit on inventories: Volumes derived from equity oil inventory will vary depending on several factors and inventory strategies, i.e. level of crude oil in inventory, equity oil used in the refining process and level of in-transit cargoes. Internal profit related to volumes sold between entities in the group, and still in inventory at period end, is eliminated according to IFRS (write down to production cost). The proportion of realised versus unrealised gain will fluctuate from one period to another due to inventory strategies and accordingly impact net operating income. This impact is not assessed to be a part of the underlying operational performance, and elimination of internal profit related to equity volumes is excluded in adjusted earnings

·Other items of income and expenseare adjusted when the impacts on income in the period are not reflective of Statoil's underlying operational performance in the reporting period. Such items may be unusual or infrequent transactions but they may also include transactions that are significant which would not necessarily qualify as either unusual or infrequent. Other items can include transactions such as provisions related to reorganisation, early retirement, etc

The measure adjusted earnings after tax excludes net financial items and the associated tax effects on net financial items. It is based on adjusted earnings less the tax effects on all elements included in adjusted earnings (or calculated tax on operating income and on each of the adjusting items using an estimated marginal tax rate). In addition, tax effect related to tax exposure items not related to the individual reporting period is excluded from adjusted earnings after tax. Management considers adjusted earnings after tax, which reflects a normalised tax charge associated with its operational performance excluding the impact of financing, to be a supplemental measure to Statoil's net income. Certain net USD denominated financial positions are held by group companies that have a USD functional currency that is different from the currency in which the taxable income is measured. As currency exchange rates change between periods, the basis for measuring net financial items for IFRS will change disproportionally with taxable income which includes exchange gains and losses from translating the net USD denominated financial positions into the currency of the applicable tax return. Therefore, the effective tax rate may be significantly higher or lower than the statutory tax rate for any given period.

Management considers that adjusted earnings after tax provides an alternative indication of the taxes associated with underlying operational performance in the period (excluding financing), and therefore facilitates an alternative comparison between periods. However, the adjusted taxes included in adjusted earnings after tax should not be considered indicative of the amount of current or total tax expense (or taxes payable) for the period.

Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings after tax should be considered additional measures rather than substitutes for net operating income and net income, which are the most directly comparable IFRS measures. There are material limitations associated with the use of adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings after tax compared with the IFRS measures since they do not include all the items of revenues/gains or expenses/losses of Statoil which are needed to evaluate its profitability on an overall basis. Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings after tax are only intended to be indicative of the underlying developments in trends of Statoil’s on-going operations for the production, manufacturing and marketing of its products and exclude pre- and post-tax impacts of net financial items. Statoil reflect such underlying development in its operations by eliminating the effects of certain items that may not be directly associated with the period's operations or financing. However, for that reason, adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings after tax are not complete measures of profitability. The measures should therefore not be used in isolation.

Adjusted earnings equal the sum of net operating income less all applicable adjustments. Adjusted earnings after tax equals the sum of net operating income less income tax in business areas and adjustments to operating income taking the applicable marginal tax into consideration. See the table below for details.

2322Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


Calculation of adjusted earnings after tax

For the year ended 31 December

(in USD million)

2017

2016

 

 

 

Net operating income

13,771

80

 

 

 

Total revenues and other income

(405)

1,020

Changes in fair value of derivatives

(197)

738

Periodisation of inventory hedging effect

(43)

360

Impairment from associated companies

 

25

Over-/underlift

(155)

232

Gain/loss on sale of assets

(10)

(333)

 

 

 

Purchases [net of inventory variation]

(35)

(9)

Operational storage effects

(94)

(228)

Eliminations

59

219

 

 

 

Operating and administrative expenses

418

617

Over-/underlift

11

(59)

Other adjustments

9

168

Gain/loss on sale of assets

382

86

Provisions

12

422

Cost accrual changes

4

         - 

 

 

 

Depreciation, amortisation and impairment

(1,055)

1,300

Impairment

917

2,946

Reversal of impairment

(1,972)

(1,646)

 

 

 

Exploration expenses

(56)

1,061

Impairment

435

1,141

Reversal of impairment

(517)

(149)

Other adjustments

0

41

Provisions

 

28

Cost accrual changes

25

         - 

 

 

 

Sum of adjustments to net operating income

(1,133)

3,990

 

 

 

Adjusted earnings

12,638

4,070

 

 

 

Tax on adjusted earnings

(8,110)

(4,277)

 

 

 

Adjusted earnings after tax

4,528

(208)

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017233


5.3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


Statoil is involved in a number of proceedings globally concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of its business. No further update is provided on previously reported legal or arbitration proceedings which Statoil does not believe will, individually or in the aggregate, have a significant effect on Statoil’s financial position, profitability, results of operations or liquidity.
See also note 9Income taxes and note 23 Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets to the Consolidated financial statements.

2342Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2017


5.6 Terms and definitionsABBREVIATIONS


Organisational abbreviations

·ADS – American Depositary Share

·ADR – American Depositary Receipt

·          ACG - Azeri-Chirag-GunashliXAzeri-Chirag-Gunashli

·          ACQ - Annual contract quantity

·          AFP - Agreement-based early retirement plan

·          AGM - Annual general meeting

·          ÅTS - Åsgard transport system

·          APA - Awards in pre-defined areas

·          ARO - Asset retirement obligation

·          BTC - Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline

·          CCS - Carbon capture and storage

·          CH4 - Methane

·          CO2CO2 - Carbon dioxide

·          DKK - Danish Krone

·          DPI - Development and& Production International

·          DPN - Development and& Production Norway

·          DPUSA - Development and& Production USA

·          DST - Drill Stem Test

·          D&W - Drilling and Well

·          EEA - European Economic Area

·          EFTA - European Free Trade Association

·          EMTN - Euro medium-term note

·          EU - European Union

·          EU ETS - EU Emissions Trading System

·          EUR - Euro

·          EXP - Exploration

·          FPSO - Floating production, storage and offload vessel

·          GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principals

·          GBP - British Pound

·          GBS - Gravity-based structure

·          GDP - Gross domestic product

·          GHG - Greenhouse gas

·          GSB - Global Strategy and& Business Development

·          HSE - Health, safety and environment

·          HTHP - High-temperature/high pressure

·          IASB - International Accounting Standards Board

·          ICE - Intercontinental Exchange

·          IEA - International Energy Agency

·          IFRS - International Financial Reporting Standards

·          IOGP - The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

·IOR - Improved oil recovery

·          LNG - Liquefied natural gas

·          LPG - Liquefied petroleum gas

·          MMP - Marketing, Midstream and& Processing

·          MPE - Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy

·          MW - Mega watt

·          NCS - Norwegian continental shelf

·          NES – New Energy Solutions

·          NIOC - National Iranian Oil Company

·          NOK - Norwegian kroner

·          NOx- Nitrogen oxide

·          OECD - Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development

·          OML - Oil mining lease

·          OPEC - Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries

·          OPEX – Operating expense

·OTC - Over-the-counter

·          OTS - Oil trading and supply department

·          P5+1 – UN Security Council`s five permanent members

·          PDO - Plan for development and operation

·          PDQ – Production drilling quarters

·          PIO - Plan for installation and operation

·          PRD - Project Development organisation


·          PSA - Production sharing agreement

·PSC – Production sharing contract

·          PSR - Procurement and Supplier Relations

·          RDI - Research, Development and Innovation

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015227


·          R&D - Research and development

·          ROACE - Return on average capital employed

·          RRR - Reserve replacement ratio

·          SAGD - Steam-assisted gravity drainage

·          SCP - South Caucasus Pipeline System

·          SDFI - Norwegian State's Direct Financial Interest

·          SEC - Securities and Exchange Commission

·          SEK - Swedish Krona

·          SFR - Statoil Fuel & Retail

·SG&A - Selling, general & administrative

·          SIF - Serious Incident Frequency

·          TAP - Trans Adriatic Pipeline AG

·          TEX - Technology Excellence

·          TLP - Tension leg platform

·          TPD - Technology, projects and drilling

·          TRIF - Total recordable injuries per million hours worked

·          TSP - Technical service provider

·          UKCS - UK continental shelf

·          USD - United States dollar

·          WTG - Wind Turbine Generators

 

Metric abbreviations etc.

·          bbl - barrel

·          mbbl - thousand barrels

·          mmbbl - million barrels

·          boe - barrels of oil equivalent

·          mboe - thousand barrels of oil equivalent

·          mmboe - million barrels of oil equivalent

·          mmcf - million cubic feet

·          MMBtummBtu - million british thermal units

·          bcf - billion cubic feet

·          tcf - trillion cubic feet

·          scm - standard cubic metre

·          mcm - thousand cubic metres

·          mmcm - million cubic metres

·          bcm - billion cubic metres

·          mmtpa - million tonnes per annum

·          km - kilometre

·          ppm - part per million

·          one billion - one thousand million

 

Equivalent measurements are based upon

·          1 barrel equals 0.134 tonnes of oil (33 degrees API)

·          1 barrel equals 42 US gallons

·          1 barrel equals 0.159 standard cubic metres

·          1 barrel of oil equivalent equals 1 barrel of crude oil

·          1 barrel of oil equivalent equals 159 standard cubic metres of natural gas

·          1 barrel of oil equivalent equals 5,612 cubic feet of natural gas

·          1 barrel of oil equivalent equals 0.0837 tonnes of NGLs

·          1 billion standard cubic metres of natural gas equals 1 million standard cubic metres of oil equivalent

·          1 cubic metre equals 35.3 cubic feet

·          1 kilometre equals 0.62 miles

·          1 square kilometre equals 0.39 square miles

·          1 square kilometre equals 247.105 acres

·          1 cubic metre of natural gas equals 1 standard cubic metre of natural gas

·          1,000 standard cubic meter gas equals 1 standard cubic meter oil equivalent

·          1,000 standard cubic metres of natural gas equals 6.29 boe

·          1 standard cubic foot equals 0.0283 standard cubic metres

·          1 standard cubic foot equals 1000 British thermal units (btu)

·          1 tonne of NGLs equals 1.9 standard cubic metres of oil equivalent

·          1 degree Celsius equals minus 32 plus five-ninths of the number of degrees Fahrenheit

 

2282362   Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    


 

Miscellaneous terms

·          Appraisal well: A well drilled to establish the extent and the size of a discovery

·          Backwardation and contango are terms used in the crude oil market. Contango is a condition where forward prices exceed spot prices, so the forward curve is upward sloping. Backwardation is the opposite condition, where spot prices exceed forward prices, and the forward curve slopes downward

·          Biofuel: A solid, liquid or gaseous fuel derived from relatively recently dead biological material and is distinguished from fossil fuels, which are derived from long dead biological material

·          BOE (barrels of oil equivalent): A measure to quantify crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas amounts using the same basis. Natural gas volumes are converted to barrels on the basis of energy content

·          Clastic reservoir systems: The integrated static and dynamic characteristics of a hydrocarbon reservoir formed by clastic rocks of a specific depositional sedimentary succession and its seal

·          Condensates: The heavier natural gas components, such as pentane, hexane, iceptane and so forth, which are liquid under atmospheric pressure – also called natural gasoline or naphtha

·          Crude oil, or oil: Includes condensate and natural gas liquids

·          Development: The drilling, construction, and related activities following discovery that are necessary to begin production of crude oil and natural gas fields

·          Downstream: The selling and distribution of products derived from upstream activities

·          Equity and entitlement volumes of oil and gas: Equity volumes represent volumes produced under a production sharing agreement (PSA) that correspond to Statoil's percentage ownership in a particular field. Entitlement volumes, on the other hand, represent Statoil's share of the volumes distributed to the partners in the field, which are subject to deductions for, among other things, royalties and the host government's share of profit oil.

Under the terms of a PSA, the amount of profit oil deducted from equity volumes will normally increase with the cumulative return on investment to the partners and/or production from the licence. The distinction between equity and entitlement is relevant to most PSA regimes, whereas it is not applicable in most concessionary regimes such as those in Norway, the UK, Canada and Brazil. The overview of equity production provides additional information for readers, as certain costs described in the profit and loss analysis were directly associated with equity volumes produced during the reported years

·          Heavy oil: Crude oil with high viscosity (typically above 10 cp), and high specific gravity. The API classifies heavy oil as crudes with a gravity below 22.3° API. In addition to high viscosity and high specific gravity, heavy oils typically have low hydrogen-to-carbon ratios, high asphaltene, sulphur, nitrogen, and heavy-metal content, as well as higher acid numbers

·          High grade: Relates to selectively harvesting goods, to cut the best and leave the rest. In reference to exploration and production this entails strict prioritisation and sequencing of drilling targets

·          Hydro: A reference to the oil and energy activities of Norsk Hydro ASA, which merged with Statoil ASA

·          IOR (improved oil recovery): Actual measures resulting in an increased oil recovery factor from a reservoir as compared with the expected value at a certain reference point in time. IOR comprises both of conventional and emerging technologies

·          Liquids: Refers to oil, condensates and NGL

·          LNG (liquefied natural gas): Lean gas - primarily methane - converted to liquid form through refrigeration to minus 163 degrees Celsius under atmospheric pressures

·          LPG (liquefied petroleum gas): Consists primarily of propane and butane, which turn liquid under a pressure of six to seven atmospheres. LPG is shipped in special vessels

·          Midstream: Processing, storage, and transport of crude oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids and sulphur

·          Naphtha: inflammable oil obtained by the dry distillation of petroleum

·          Natural gas: Petroleum that consists principally of light hydrocarbons. It can be divided into 1) lean gas, primarily methane but often containing some

ethane and smaller quantities of heavier hydrocarbons (also called sales gas) and 2) wet gas, primarily ethane, propane and butane as well as smaller amounts of heavier hydrocarbons; partially liquid under atmospheric pressure

·          NGL (natural gas liquids): Light hydrocarbons mainly consisting of ethane, propane and butane which are liquid under pressure at normal temperature

·          Oil sands: A naturally occurring mixture of bitumen, water, sand, and clay. A heavy viscous form of crude oil

·          Oil and gas value chains: Describes the value that is being added at each step from 1) exploring; 2) developing; 3) producing; 4) transportation and refining; and 5) marketing and distribution

·          Organic capital expenditures: Capital expenditures excluding acquisitions, capital leases and other investments with significant different cash flow pattern

·          Oslo Børs: Oslo stock exchange

·Peer group: Statoil’s peer group consists of Statoil, Shell, ExxonMobil, OMV, ConocoPhillips, BP, Marathon, Chevron, Total, Repsol, Anadarko and Eni

·Petroleum: A collective term for hydrocarbons, whether solid, liquid or gaseous. Hydrocarbons are compounds formed from the elements hydrogen

(H) and carbon (C). The proportion of different compounds, from methane and ethane up to the heaviest components, in a petroleum find varies from discovery to discovery. If a reservoir primarily contains light hydrocarbons, it is described as a gas field. If heavier hydrocarbons predominate, it is described as an oil field. An oil field may feature free gas above the oil and contain a quantity of light hydrocarbons, also called associated gas

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015229


·          Proved reserves: Reserves claimed to have a reasonable certainty (normally at least 90% confidence) of being recoverable under existing economic and political conditions, and using existing technology. They are the only type the US Securities and Exchange Commission allows oil companies to report

·          Refining reference margin: Is a typical average gross margin of our two refineries, Mongstad and Kalundborg. The reference margin will differ from the actual margin, due to variations in type of crude and other feedstock, throughput, product yields, freight cost, inventory etc

·          Rig year: A measure of the number of equivalent rigs operating during a given period. It is calculated as the number of days rigs are operating divided by the number of days in the period

·          Upstream: Includes the searching for potential underground or underwater oil and gas fields, drilling of exploratory wells, subsequent operating wells which bring the liquids and or natural gas to the surface

·          VOC (volatile organic compounds): Organic chemical compounds that have high enough vapour pressures under normal conditions to significantly vaporise and enter the earth's atmosphere (e.g. gasses formed under loading and offloading of crude oil)

 

230Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    237


 

105.7 Forward-looking statements



This Annual Report on Form 20-F contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, in particular in the sections "Business overview" and "Strategy and market overview". In some cases, we use words such as "aim", "ambition", "anticipate", "believe", "continue", "could", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "likely", "objective", "outlook", "may", "plan", "schedule", "seek", "should", "strategy", "target", "will", "goal" and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including, among others, statements regarding future financial position, results of operations and cash flows; future financial ratios and information; future financial or operational portfolio or performance; future market position and conditions; future credit rating; future worldwide economic trends and market conditions; future investment in new energy solutions; business strategy; our name change; growth strategy; sales, trading and market strategies; research and development initiatives and strategy; market outlook and future economic projections and assumptions; competitive position; projected regularity and performance levels; expectations related to production levels, investment, exploration and development in connection with our recent transactions and projects, such asin Brazil, the sale of interests inNCS, Russia, Turkey, the Shah Deniz projectUnited Kingdom and the South Caucasus Pipeline,  interests in the Marcellus onshore play in the US, interests in Trans Adriatic Pipeline, interests in Gudrun and acquisition of interests in Eagle Ford in the US, the UK Mariner project, the Peregrino phase II project in Brazil, in addition to the Johan Sverdrup and Aasta Hansteen projects on the NCS,United States; discoveries on the NCS and internationally; our joint venture with Rosneft; expectations related to our refining plants and terminals; our ownership share in Gassled; completion and results of acquisitions, disposals and other contractual arrangements;arrangements and delivery commitments; reserve information; recovery factors and levels; future margins; projected returns; future levels or development of capacity, reserves or resources; future decline of mature fields; planned turnarounds and other maintenance;maintenance activity; plans for cessation and decommissioning; oil and gas production forecasts and reporting; gas volume; growth, expectations and development of production, projects, pipelines or resources; estimates related to production and development levels and dates; operational expectations, estimates, schedules and costs; exploration and development activities, plans and expectations; projections and expectations for upstream and downstream activities; expectations relating to licences; expectations relating to leases; oil, gas, alternative fuel and energy prices and volatility; oil, gas, alternative fuel and energy supply and demand; renewable energy production, projects, our carbon footprint and carbon dioxide emissions, industry outlook and carbon capture and storage; processes related to human rights laws; organisational structure and policies; planned responses to climate change; technological innovation, implementation, position and expectations; future energy efficiency; projected operational costs or savings; our ability to create or improve value; future sources of financing; expectations regarding board composition, remuneration and application of the company performance modifier future levels of diversity; exploration and project development expenditure; our goal of safe and efficient operations; effectiveness of our internal policies and plans; our ability to manage our risk exposure; our liquidity levels and management; estimated or future liabilities, obligations or expenses; expected impact of currency and interest rate fluctuations; expectations related to contractual or financial counterparties; capital expenditure estimates and expectations; projected outcome, impact or timing of HSE regulations; HSE goals and objectives of management for future operations; expectations related to regulatory trends; impact of PSA effects; projected impact or timing of administrative or governmental rules, standards, decisions, standards or laws (including taxation laws); projected impact of legal claims against us; plans for capital distribution and share buy-backs and amounts of dividends are forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described above in "Risk review", and in "Operational review", and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

 

These forward-looking statements reflect current views about future events and are, by their nature, subject to significant risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including levels of industry product supply, demand and pricing; exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations; the political and economic policies of Norway and other oil-producing countries; EU directives; general economic conditions; political and social stability and economic growth in relevant areas of the world; Euro-zone uncertainty; global political events and actions, including war, terrorism and sanctions; security breaches, including breaches of our digital infrastructure (cybersecurity); changes or uncertainty in or non-compliance with laws and governmental regulations; the timing of bringing new fields on stream; an inability to exploit growth opportunities; material differences from reserves estimates; unsuccessful drilling; an inability to find and develop reserves; ineffectiveness of crisis management systems; adverse changes in tax regimes; the development and use of new technology, particularly in the renewable energy sector; geological or technical difficulties; operational problems; operator error; inadequate insurance coverage; the lack of necessary transportation infrastructure when a field is in a remote location and other transportation problems; the actions of competitors; the actions of field partners; the actions of the Norwegian state as majority shareholder; counterparty defaults; natural disasters, adverse weather conditions, climate change, and other changes to business conditions; failure to meet our ethical and social standards; an inability to attract and retain personnel and other factors discussed elsewhere in this report.

 

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our future results, level of activity, performance or achievements will meet these expectations. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. Unless we are required by law to update these statements, we will not necessarily update any of these statements after the date of this Annual Report, either to make them conform to actual results or changes in our expectations.

 

2382Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    231


 

115.8 Signature page



The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F/A20-F and that it has duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

 

 

STATOIL ASA

(Registrant)

 

 

By:            /s/Hans Jakob Hegge                 

Name:      Hans Jakob Hegge

Title:        Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Dated:  12 April 201623 March 2018

 

232Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015


 

125.9 Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Amendment No. 1:Annual Report:

 

Exhibit no
Number

Description of Document

1

Exhibit 1

Articles of Association of Statoil ASA as amended, effective from 14 May 2013 (English translation).*

- articles of association 060218

2-1Exhibit 2.1 Form of Indenture
2-2Exhibit 2.2 Amended and Restated Agency Agreement dated 5 May 2017
2-3Exhibit 2.3 Deed of Covenant dated 5 february 2016
2-4Exhibit 2.4 Deed of Guarantee dated 5 february 2016
 4a-iExhibit 4(a)(i)

Technical Services Agreement between TSA Gassco AS and Statoil Petroleum AS, dated November 24, 2010.*

(original contract)

 4a-iiExhibit 4(c)

4(a)(ii) TSA Amendments

4cExhibit 4c Employment agreement with Eldar Sætre as of 4 February 2015.*

CEO

Exhibit 7

Calculation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges.*

 7

Exhibit 7 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
8Exhibit 8

Subsidiaries (see section 3.9 Significant subsidiaries included in section 2.7 Corporate in this Annual Report).*

12-1Exhibit 12.1

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.**

the CEO

12-2Exhibit 12.2

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.**

the CFO

13-1Exhibit 13.1

Rule 13a-14(b) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. 1) **

the CEO

13-2Exhibit 13.2

Rule 13a-14(b) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. 1) **

the CFO

15a-iExhibit 15(a)(i)

Consent of KPMG AS.*

15a-iiExhibit 15(a)(ii)

Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.*

MacNaughton

15a-iiiExhibit 15(a)(iii)

Report of DeGoylerDeGolyer and MacNaughton.*

MacNaughton

101

Interactive Data Files (formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language)). Submitted electronically with the Annual Report on Form 20-F.

1)

Furnished only.

*

Previously filed with the Original Form 20-F on March 18, 2016.

**

 Filed or furnished with this Amendment No. 1.

The total amount of long-term debt securities of the Registrant and its subsidiaries authorised under any one instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Statoil ASA and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The company agrees to furnish copies of any or all such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015233


 

135.10 Cross reference to Form 20-F

 

 

Sections

Item 1.

Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

N/A

Item 2.

Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

N/A

Item 3.

Key Information

 

 

A. Selected Financial Data

1.2; 4.1.2; 6; 6.1.1; 6.7Key Figures and Highlights; 5.1 Shareholder information—Exchange rates

 

B. Capitalisation and Indebtedness

N/A

 

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

N/A

 

D. Risk Factors

5.12.11 (Risk review—Risk factors)

Item 4.

Information on the Company

 

 

A. History and Development of the Company

3.1; 3.2; 4.1.4; 4.1.5; 4.2.3; 8.1.4Statoil at a Glance; 2.2 (Business Overview); 2.3 (E&P Norway – Exploration & Production Norway); 2.4 (E&P International – Exploration & Production International); 2.5 (MMP – Marketing, Midstream & Processing); 2.6 (Other group); 2.10 (Liquidity and capital resources—Reviews of cash flows); 2.10 (Liquidity and Capital Resources—Investments); note 4 (Acquisitions and divestments) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

B. Business Overview

2; 3; 4.1.1; 4.1.32.1 (Strategy and market overview); 2.2 (Business overview); 2.3 (E&P Norway – Exploration & Production Norway); 2.4 (E&P International – Exploration & Production International); 2.5 (MMP – Marketing, Midstream & Processing); 2.6 (Other group); 2.7 (Corporate)

 

C. Organisational Structure

3.1; 3.4; 3.92.2 (Business overview—Corporate structure); 2.2 (Business Overview—Segment reporting); 2.7 (Corporate—Subsidiaries and properties)

 

D. Property, Plants and Equipment

3.5 - 3.7; 3.13; 4.2.3; 8.1.11; 8.1.222.3 (E&P Norway – Exploration & Production Norway); 2.4 (E&P International – Exploration & Production International); 2.5 (MMP – Marketing, Midstream & Processing); 2.7 (Corporate—Property, plant and equipment); 2.10 (Liquidity and Capital Resources—Investments); notes 10 (Property, plant and equipment) and 22 (Leases) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

Oil and Gas Disclosures

3.10.1; 3.10.2; 3.11; 3.11.1; 3.11.2; 3.11.3; 3.11.4; 8.1.27;2.8 (Operational performance—Proved oil and gas reserves); 2.8 (Operational performance—Production volumes and pricing); Exhibit 15(a)(iv)(iii)

Item 4A.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None

Item 5.

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

 

 

A. Operating Results

3.12; 4.1; 4.2.4; 5.2.1; 8.1.252.7 (Corporate—Applicable laws and regulations); 2.9 (Financial review); 2.10 (Liquidity and capital resources—Impact of reduced prices); 2.11 (Risk review—Risk management—Managing financial risks); note 25 (Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

4.2; 4.2.1; 4.2.2; 4.2.5; 5.2.1; 5.2.2; 8.1.5; 8.1.16; 8.1.18; 8.1.252.10 (Liquidity and capital resources); 2.11 (Risk review—Risk management); notes 5 (Financial risk management), 15 (Trades and other receivables); 16 (Cash and cash equivalent); 18 (Finance debt), 23 (Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets) and 25 (Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

C. Research and development, Patents and Licenses,Licences, etc.

3.8.3; 8.1.72.2 (Business overview—Research and development); note 7 (Other expenses) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

D. Trend Information

2; 3.3; 3.5.1; 3.5.3; 3.5.4; 3.6; 3.7.1; 3.11; 3.12.5; 4.2; 5; 8.1.23passim

 

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

4.2.5; 4.2.6; 8.1.22; 8.1.232.10 (Liquidity and capital resources—Principal Contractual obligations); 2.10 (Liquidity and capital resources—Off balance sheet arrangements); notes 22 (Leases) and 23 (Other commitments, contingent liabilities and contingent assets) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

4.2.52.10 (Liquidity and capital resources—Principal contractual obligations)

 

G. Safe Harbor

105.7 (Forward-Looking Statements)

Item 6.

Directors, Senior Management and Employees

 

 

A. Directors and Senior Management

7.6; 7.83.5 (Board of directors); 3.6 (Management)

 

B. Compensation

7.9; 8.1.193.7 (Compensation to governing bodies); 3.8 (Share ownership)

 

C. Board Practices

7.5; 7.6; 7.83.5 (Board of directors—Audit committee; Compensation and executive development committee); 3.6 (Management)

 

D. Employees

3.16.1; 3.16.32.13 (Our people—Employees in Statoil); 2.13 (Our people—Unions and representatives)

 

E. Share Ownership

6.2.1; 7.6; 7.8; 7.103.7 (Compensation to governing bodies); 5.1 (Shareholder information—Shares purchased by the issuer—Statoil’s share savings plan)

Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

 

 

A. Major Shareholders

6.85.1 (Shareholder information—Major shareholders)

 

B. Related Party Transactions

3.14; 8.1.242.7 (Corporate—Related party transactions); note 24 (Related parties) to Statoil Consolidated financial statement

 

C. Interests of Experts and Counsel

N/A

Item 8.

Financial Information

 

 

A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

4.1.3; 5.3; 6.1; 84.1 (Statoil Consolidated financial statements); 5.1 (Shareholder information—Dividend policy and dividends); 5.3 (Legal proceedings)

 

B. Significant Changes

8.1.27Note 28 (Subsequent events) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements) 

Item 9.

The Offer and Listing

 

 

A. Offer and Listing Details

6.45.1 (Shareholder information); 5.1 (Shareholder information—Share Prices)

 

B. Plan of Distribution

N/A

 

C. Markets

6; 6.4; 7.75.1 (Shareholder Information)

 

D. Selling Shareholders

N/A

 

E. Dilution

N/A

 

F. Expenses of the Issue

N/A

Item 10.

Additional Information

 

 

A. Share Capital

N/A

 

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

6.1; 6.8; 7.1; 7.3; 7.10; 8.1.172.11 (Risk review—Risks related to state ownership); 3.1 (Introduction—Articles of association); 3.2 (General meeting of shareholders); 5.1 (Shareholder information); 5.1 (Shareholder Information—Major Shareholders) and note 17 (Shareholders’ Equity and dividends) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

 

C. Material Contracts

N/A

 

D. Exchange Controls

6.65.1 (Shareholder information—Exchange controls and limitations

 

E. Taxation

6.55.1 (Shareholder information—Taxation)

 

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

N/A

 

G. Statements by Experts

N/A

 

H. Documents On Display

1.1About the Report

 

I. Subsidiary Information

N/A

Item 11.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

5; 8.1.5; 8.1.252.11 (Risk review—Risk management); notes 5 (Financial risk management) and 25 (Financial instruments: fair value measurement and sensitivity analysis of market risk) to Statoil Consolidated financial statements

Item 12.

Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

5; 8.1.5; 8.1.25

 

A. Debt Securities

N/A

 

B. Warrants and Rights

N/A

 

C. Other Securities

N/A

 

D. American Depositary Shares

6.4.25.1 (Shareholder Information—Statoil ADR Programme Fees)

Item 13.

Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

None

Item 14.

Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of

None

Proceeds

None

Item 15.

Controls and Procedures

7.12; 8.2.23.10 (Risk management and internal control—Controls and Procedures); note 28 Condensed consolidated financial information related to guaranteed debt securities to Statoil Consolidated financial statements; 3.5 (Board of directors—Audit committee)

Item 16A.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

7.6.13.5 (The work of the board of directors—Audit Committee)

Item 16B.

Code of Ethics

7.23.1 (Introduction—Code of Conduct)

Item 16C.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

7.13.9 (External Auditor)

Item 16D.

Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

7.73.1 (Introduction—Compliance with NYSE listing rules)

Item 16E.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

6.25.1 (Shareholder Information—Shares purchased by the Issuer)

Item 16F.

Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

N/A

Item 16G.

Corporate Governance

7.73.1 (Introduction—Compliance with NYSE listing rules)

Item 16H

Mine Safety Disclosure

None

Item 17.

Financial Statements

N/A

Item 18.

Financial Statements

8

Item 19.

Exhibits

124.1 (Statoil Consolidated financial statements)

234Statoil, Annual Report on Form 20-F 20152017    241