UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 20-F

   
[   ]o REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

or

   
[X]þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20032004

or

   
[   ]o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 0-16673


Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

British Virgin Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

116 Main Street
3rd Floor
Road Town, Tortola
British Virgin Islands

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Shares, $0.01 par value per share

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: NONE

     As of December 31, 2003,2004, there were 41,231,27242,664,536 common shares of the registrant outstanding.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]þ No [   ]o

     Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow: Item 17. [   ]o Item 18. [X]



þ

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Item 3. Key Information
Item 4. Information on the Company
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
Item 8. Financial Information
Item 9. The Listing
Item 10. Additional Information
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Item 16. [Reserved]
Item 16 A. Audit Committee Financial Expert
Item 16 B. Code of Ethics
Item 16 C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Item 16 D. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
Item 18. Financial Statements
Item 19 Exhibits
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
Memorandum & Articles of Association June 26, 2003
Agmt between Sony Ericsson & Nam Tai March 20, '02
Agmt between Nam Tai(Shenzhen) & Sony Sept 15, '03
Agmt between Sony Ericsson & Nam Tai (Shenzhen)
Purchase Agmt between Citigroup & Nam Tai
Agmt between Omnivision & Namtai July 15 '03
Agmt between JIC Technology & Glory Gate June'03
Agmt Amend. between Sony Ericsson & Nam Tai Jan'03
Sale & Purchase Agmt JIC & Zastron March 10 '03
Sale & Purchase Agmt between Zastron & JIC March03
Agmt among Toshiba, Nam Tai, and Zastron, Jan 27
Agmt between Sony Ericsson & Nam Tai Jan 10 2003
Agmt between Sony Ericsson & Nam Tai Jan 10 2003
Basic Agmt between JCT Wireless & Nam Tai Jan '03
Basic Agmt between Optrex & Nam Tai Jan 1 2003
Basic agmt and two memo on Sept. 8, 2003
Agmt between Sony Computer & Nam Tai Sept 15 2003
Service Agmt between Sony Ericsson & Namtai 2003
Construction Agmt between Namtai & Takasago 2003
Investment Agmt & Shareholders Agmt Dec 9 2003
Supplemental Agmt Jan 2, 2004
Agmt between Frontier Profit & NamTai March 10, 04
Diagram of Subsidiaries (See p25-27 of Report)
Certification
Certification
Code of ethics
Independent Auditors' Consent Match 10 2004
Certification pursuant to Section 906
Certification pursuant to Section 906


TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
    
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors — Not applicable  3 
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable — Not applicable  3 
Key Information  3 
Information on the Company  14 
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  3027 
Directors, Senior Management and Employees  4643 
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  5148 
Financial Information  5350 
The Listing  5754 
Additional Information  5755 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk  6460 
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities — Not applicable  6461 
    
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies — Not applicable  6562 
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds — Not applicable  6562 
Controls and Procedures  6562 
[Reserved]  6562 
Audit Committee Financial Expert  6562 
Code of Ethics  6563 
Principal Accountant Fees and Services  6663 
Purchase Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers  6664 
    
Financial Statements — Not applicable  6764 
Financial Statements  6764 
Exhibits  68 
EX-4.3 EQUITY INTEREST TRANSFER AGREEMENT
EX-4.7 LAND TITLE RIGHTS
EX-4.9 MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING
EX-4.10 SALE AND PURCHASER AGREEMENT
EX-4.11 TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
EX-4.12 DEED OF INDEMNITY
EX-4.13 UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 15, 2004
EX-4.14 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
EX-4.15 UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT DATED APRIL 22, 2004
EX-4.16 PRICING DETERMINATION AGREEMENT
EX-4.17 STOCK BORROWING AGREEMENT
EX-4.18 AMENDED 2001 OPTION PLAN
EX-4.19 ACCESSION AGREEMENT
EX-4.20 ESCROW AGREEMENT
EX-4.21 SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
EX-4.22 DEED OF ASSIGNMENT OF TRADEMARKS
EX-4.23 BANKING FACILITIES LETTER
EX-4.24 SHARE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
EX-12.1 CERTIFICATION TO SECTION 302
EX-12.2 CERTIFICATION TO SECTION 302
EX-14.1 CODE OF ETHICS
EX-23.1 CONSENT OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
EX-99.1 CERTIFICATION TO SECTION 906
EX-99.2 CERTIFICATION TO SECTION 906

SIGNATURES AND CERTIFICATIONS

     Consents of Independent Accountants (to incorporation of their report on Financial Statements into the Company’s Registration Statements on Forms F-3 and S-8)

     This Annual Report onForm 20-F contains forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled Risk Factors“Risk Factors” under Item 3. Key Information.

     Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s view only as of the date of this Report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. Readers should also carefully review the risk factors described in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CURRENCY PRESENTATION

     The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and publishes its financial statements in United States dollars.

2


PART I

     Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this annual report, or Report, to “Nam Tai”, or “we”, or “our”, or “us”, and the “Company” refer to Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and their respective predecessors. References to “dollars” or $ are to United States dollars.

Item 1.Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

     Not applicable.

Item 2.Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

     Not applicable.

Item 3.Key Information

Selected Financial Data

     Our historical consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and are presented in U.S. dollars. The following selected statements of income data for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20032004 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 20022003 and 20032004 are derived from our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Report. The selected statements of income data for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 19992000 and 20002001 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 20012002 were derived from our audited financial statements, which are not included in this Report. The following data should be read in conjunction with the Section of the Report entitled Item 5.5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, and our consolidated financial statements including the related footnotes. All reference to numbers of common shares, per share data and stock option data have been adjusted to give effect to a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003 on a retroactive basis and for the purposes of earnings per share calculation, all references to numbers of common shares, and per share data have been adjusted to reflect an issuance of a stock dividend to shareholders at a ratio of one dividend share for every ten shares, or a ten-for-one stock dividend, effective on November 7, 2003.

 Year ended December 31,
 
                    
 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year ended December 31, 
 
 
 
 
 
 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 
 (in thousands except per share data)  (in thousands except per share data) 
Consolidated statements of income data:
Consolidated statements of income data:
  
 
Net sales — third partiesNet sales — third parties $145,054 $207,456 $212,934 $228,167 $385,524  $207,456 $212,934 $228,167 $385,524 $499,680 
Net sales — related partyNet sales — related party  6,232 21,072 7,849 20,782  6,232 21,072 7,849 20,782 34,181 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total net salesTotal net sales 145,054 213,688 234,006 236,016 406,306  213,688 234,006 236,016 406,306 533,861 
Cost of salesCost of sales 120,074 182,096 203,974 197,956 340,016  182,096 203,974 197,956 340,016 457,385 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross profitGross profit 24,980 31,592 30,032 38,060 66,290  31,592 30,032 38,060 66,290 76,476 
Operating costs and expenses:Operating costs and expenses:  
Selling, general and administrative 14,913 17,646 21,974 17,983 24,866 
Research and development 2,624 3,489 2,954 2,686 4,037 
Impairment of goodwill    339  
Non-recurring income  (848)     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative 17,646 21,974 17,983 24,866 28,053 
Research and development 3,489 2,954 2,686 4,037 5,045 
Impairment of goodwill   339   
Total operating expensesTotal operating expenses 16,689 21,135 24,928 21,008 28,903  21,135 24,928 21,008 28,903 33,098 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from operationsIncome from operations 8,291 10,457 5,104 17,052 37,387  10,457 5,104 17,052 37,387 43,378 
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies 1,146  (189) 1,867 10,741 498 
Other income (expenses) — netOther income (expenses) — net 2,494 13,853 2,709  (6,043) 5,525  13,853 2,709  (6,043) 5,525 37,397 
Interest expenseInterest expense  (192)  (165)  (178)  (790)  (121)  (165)  (178)  (790)  (121)  (195)
Write-off of investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary  (1)     
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxes and minority interestsIncome before income taxes and minority interests 11,738 23,956 9,502 20,960 43,289  24,145 7,635 10,219 42,791 80,580 
Income taxes benefit (expense) 60 33  (227)  (773)  (399)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income before minority interests 11,798 23,989 9,275 20,187 42,890 
Minority interests  12  (230)  (164)  (1,067)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income after minority interests 11,798 24,001 9,045 20,023 41,823 
Discontinued operation     1,979 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income $11,798 $24,001 $9,045 $20,023 $43,802 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share: 
Basic $0.38 $0.80 $0.27 $0.57 $1.09 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted $0.38 $0.78 $0.26 $0.57 $1.07 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares: 
Basic 30,783 30,077 33,905 34,885 40,336 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted 31,075 30,938 34,298 35,430 40,839 
 
 
 
 
 
 

3


                     
  At December 31,
  
  1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
 
 
  (in thousands)
Consolidated balance sheet data:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $54,215  $58,896  $58,676  $82,477  $61,827 
Working capital  61,265   89,568   83,982   87,408   96,801 
Property, plant and equipment — net  44,717   44,599   70,414   75,914   77,647 
Total assets  158,747   208,370   224,573   275,086   297,695 
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt  6,949   1,523   3,687   14,970   3,004 
Long-term debt, less current portion        12,860   2,812   1,688 
Total debt  6,949   1,523   16,547   17,782   4,692 
Shareholders’ equity  125,568   162,364   169,351   202,128   217,118 
Common Shares  264   306   312   360   412 
Total dividend per share  0.11   0.45   0.13   0.49   1.00 

                     
  Year ended December 31, 
  2000  2001  2002 2003  2004 
      (in thousands except per share data)     
Income taxes benefit (expense)  33   (227)  (773)  (399)  (879)
Income before minority interests and equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  24,178   7,408   9,446   42,392   79,701 
Minority interests  12   (230)  (164)  (1,067)  (6,010)
Income after minority interests  24,190   7,178   9,282   41,325   73,691 
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  (189)  1,867   10,741   498   (6,806)
Discontinued operation           1,979    
Net income $24,001  $9,045  $20,023  $43,802  $66,885 
Earnings per share:                    
Basic $0.80  $0.27  $0.57  $1.09  $1.57 
Diluted $0.78  $0.26  $0.57  $1.07  $1.57 
Weighted average shares:                    
Basic  30,077   33,905   34,885   40,336   42,496 
Diluted  30,938   34,298   35,430   40,839   42,548 
                     
 At December 31,
  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004 
 (in thousands)
Consolidated balance sheet data:
                    
                 
Cash and cash equivalents $58,896  $58,676  $82,477  $61,827  $160,649 
Working capital  88,969   83,525   87,184   93,474   218,243 
Property, plant and equipment — net  44,599   70,414   75,914   77,647   97,441 
Total assets  208,370   224,573   275,086   297,695   460,473 
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt  1,523   3,687   14,970   3,004   4,955 
Long-term debt, less current portion     12,860   2,812   1,688   5,163 
Total debt  1,523   16,547   17,782   4,692   10,118 
Shareholders’ equity  162,364   169,351   202,128   217,118   305,053 
Common shares  306   312   360   412   426 
Total dividend per share  0.45   0.13   0.49   1.00   0.48 

Risk Factors

     We may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements. Written forward-looking statements may appear in this document and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases, in reports to shareholders, on our website, and other documents. The Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 contains a safe harbor for forward-looking statements on which the Company relies in making such disclosures. In connection with this “safe harbor”, we are hereby identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Any such statements are qualified by reference to the following cautionary statements:

Risks Related to Our Business

We are dependent on a few large customers, the loss of any of which could substantially harm our business and operating results.

     Historically, a substantial percentage of our sales have been to a small number of customers. During the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, sales to our customers accounting for 10% or more of our net sales aggregated approximately 44.1%60.2%, 60.2%46.7% and 46.7%47.9%, respectively, of our net sales. The loss of Epson Precision (HK) Ltd., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications ABSharp Corporation, Wuxi Sharp Electronic Components Co., Ltd., or Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd.Motorola Inc., each of which accounted for more than 10% of our net sales during 2003,2004, or a substantial reduction in orders from any of them, would materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.

Our quarterly and annual operating results are subject to significant fluctuations from a wide variety of factors.

     Our quarterly and annual operating results are affected by a wide variety of factors that could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results during any period. This could result from any one or a combination of factors, such as:

4


   the timing, cancellation or postponement of orders,orders;
 
   the type of product and related margins,margins;
 
   our customers’ announcement and introduction of new products or new generations of products,products;
 
   the life cycles of our customers’ products,products;
 
   our timing of expenditures in anticipation of future orders,orders;
 
   our effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes, including, interruptions or slowdowns in production and changes in cost and availability of components,components; and
 
   the mix of orders filled.

     The volume and timing of orders received during a quarter are difficult to forecast. From time to time, our customers encounter uncertain and changing demand for their products. Customers generally order based on their forecasts. If demand falls below such forecasts or if customers do not control inventories effectively, they may reduce, cancel or postpone shipments of orders.

4


     As a consequence of any of the above factors, our results of operations in any period should not be considered indicative of results to be expected in any future period, and fluctuations in operating results may also result in fluctuations in the market price of our common shares. Our results of operations in future periods may fall below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. This failure to meet expectations could cause the trading price of our common shares to decline substantially.

Cancellations or delays in orders could materially and adversely affect our gross margins and operating income.

     Sales to our original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, customers are primarily based on purchase orders we receive from time to time rather than firm, long-term purchase commitments. Although it is our general practice to purchase raw materials only upon receiving a purchase order, for certain customers we will occasionally purchase raw materials based on such customers’ rolling forecasts. Further, during times of potential component shortages, we have purchased, and may continue to purchase, raw materials and component parts in the expectation of receiving purchase orders for products that use these components. In the event actual purchase orders are delayed, are not received or are cancelled, we would experience increased inventory levels or possible write-down of raw material inventory that could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. In 2001, we wrote down inventory for $3.8 million for slow-moving raw materials relating to cancelled, reduced or delayed orders. Subsequently, we were able to use some of these raw materials in production or we received compensation for the unused raw materials from certain of our customers, and the gain of $2.0 million was recorded in cost of sales during 2002.

If we are unable to produce our new products in a high-quality and cost-effective manner, our gross margins and business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

     We have experienced increased costs associated with developing advanced manufacturing techniques to produce our complex products on a mass scale and at a low cost. This has negatively impacted our gross margins. For example, our initial production runs of liquid crystal display, or LCD, modules experienced low production yields and other inefficiencies. We have commenced production of BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory, radio frequency, or RF, modules, thin film transistor liquid crystal display, or TFT LCD, modules, color LCD modules and complementary metal oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, sensor modules and flexible printed circuit, or FPC, sub-assemblies in relation to which we have relatively limited manufacturing experience. We expect that a substantial portion of our growth will come from our manufacture of these products. While we expect and plan for such increased costs in our new product manufacturing cycle, we cannot precisely predict the time and expense required to overcome initial problems and to ensure reliability and high quality at an acceptable cost. The increased costs and other difficulties associated with manufacturing RF modules, TFT LCD modules, color LCD modules, CMOS sensor modules, FPC sub-assemblies and other new products could have a negative impact on our future gross margins. In addition, even if we develop capabilities to manufacture new products, there can be no guarantee that a market will exist for such products or that such products will adequately respond to market trends. If we invest resources to develop capabilities to manufacture new products, like the investment in our new factory, for which a market does not develop, our business and operating results would be seriously harmed. Even if the market for our services grows, it may not grow at an adequate pace.

Our inability to utilize capacity at our new factory could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

     In order to expand our production capacity, we intend to use approximately $40 million to construct and equiphave built a new factory consisting of approximately 250,000265,000 square feet on land adjacent to our principal manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China, or China. Construction beganChina or the PRC. The construction was completed in September 2003,December 2004 and we expect itfull operations to be completed by the endcommence in April 2005. As of the fourth quarter in 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2003,2004, we had spent $1.2$15.0 million on this construction. Onceto cover the cost of construction and fixtures and equipment for the new factory. The financing for these improvements to our new factory is completed, we willmanufacturing facilities was obtained from our internal resources. We have committed substantial expenditures and resources constructing and equipping this factory but cannot guarantee that we will be able to fully utilize such additional capacity. Our factory utilization is dependent on our success in providing manufacturing services for new or other products that we intend to produce at that factory, including image capturing devices and their modules, such as BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory for cellular phones, CMOS sensor modules RF modules, TFT and color LCD modules and handset assemblies for cellular phones with built-in camera function, home entertainment products and FPC sub-assemblies at a price and volume sufficient to absorb our increased overhead expenses. Demand for contract manufacturing of these products may not be as high as we expect, and we may fail to realize the expected benefit from our investment in our new factory.

5


We face increasing competition, which has had an adverse effect on our margins.

     Although certain barriers to entry exist in providing electronics manufacturing services, or EMS, including technical expertise, substantial capital requirements, difficulties relating to building customer relationships and a large customer base, the barriers to entry are comparatively low and we are aware that manufacturers in Hong Kong and China may be developing or have developed the required technical capability and customer base to compete with our existing business.

     Competition in the electronics manufacturing services, or EMS industry is intense and is characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, and competition from major international companies. This intense competition has resulted in pricing pressures, lower sales and reduced margins. Continuing competitive pressures could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. Over the last several years our margins have declined substantially, from 17.2% in 1999 to approximately 16.3%14.3% in 2003.2004. Continuing competitive pressures could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

5


We may not be able to compete successfully with our competitors, many of which have substantially greater resources than we do.

     The electronics manufacturing services we provide are available from many independent sources as well as from our current and potential customers with in-house manufacturing capabilities. Our EMS competitors include Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation and Solectron Corporation. Our principal competitors in the manufacture of our traditional product lines of calculators, personal organizers and linguistic products include Kinpo Electronics, Inc. and Inventec Co. Ltd. Our competitors in the manufacturing of image capturing devices and their modules include Lite-On Technology Corporation, The Primax Group and Logitech Inc.International S.A. Our principal competitors in the manufacture of mobile phone accessories include Elcoteq Network Corp. Our competitors in the manufacturing of RF modules include Wavecom and WKK International (Holdings) Ltd. Our competitors in the manufacturing of LCD panels include Truly International Holdings Ltd. and Varitronix International Ltd. We also have numerous competitors in the telecommunication, subassembliessub-assemblies and components product lines, including Philips, Samsung, Solectron and Varitronix.Varitronix International Ltd. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing, manufacturing, regional shipping capabilities and logistics support and personnel resources than we do. As a result, we may be unable to compete successfully with these organizations in the future.

We must spend substantial amounts to maintain and develop advanced manufacturing processes and engage additional engineering personnel in order to attract new customers and business.

     We operate in rapidly changing industries. Technological advances, the introduction of new products and new manufacturing and design techniques could materially and adversely affect our business unless we are able to adapt to those changing conditions. As a result, we are continually required to commit substantial funds for, and significant resources to, engaging additional engineering and other technical personnel and to purchase advanced design, production and test equipment.

     Our future operating results will depend to a significant extent on our ability to continue to provide new manufacturing solutions that compare favorably on the basis of time to introduction, cost, and performance with the manufacturing capabilities of OEMs and competitive third-party suppliers. Our success in attracting new customers and developing new business depends on various factors, including:

   utilization of advances in technology;
 
   development of new or improved manufacturing processes for our customer’s products;
 
   delivery of efficient and cost-effective services; and
 
   timely completion of the manufacture of new products.

We generally have no written agreements with suppliers to obtain components and our margins and operating results could suffer from increases in component prices.

     We are typicallysometimes responsible for purchasing components used in manufacturing products for our customers. We generally do not have written agreements with our suppliers of components. This typically results in our bearing the risk of component price increases because we may be unable to procure the required materials at a price level necessary to generate anticipated margins from the orders of our customers. Accordingly, increases in component prices could materially and adversely affect our gross margins and operating results.

Our business and operating results would be materially and adversely affected if our suppliers of needed components fail to meet our needs.

     At various times, we have and continue to experience shortages of some of the electronic components that we use, and suppliers of some components lack sufficient capacity to meet the demand for these components. In some cases, supply shortages and delays in deliveries of particular components have resulted in curtailed production, or delays in production, of assemblies using that component, which contributed to an increase in our inventory levels and reduction in our gross margins. We expect that shortages and delays in deliveries of some components will continue. If we are unable to obtain sufficient components on a timely basis, we may experience manufacturing delays, which could harm our relationships with current or prospective customers and reduce our sales. We also depend on a small number of suppliers for certain of the

6


components that we use in our business. For example, we purchase most of our integrated circuits from Toshiba Corporation and Sharp Corporation and certain of their affiliates. If we were unable to continue to purchase components from these limited source suppliers, our business and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

6


Factors affecting the electronics industry in general and our customers in particular could harm our operations.

     Most of our sales are to customers in the electronics industry, which is subject to rapid technological change, product obsolescence and short product life cycles and has suffered from an industry-wide slowdown since 2000. The factors affecting the electronics industry in general, or any of our major customers or competitors in particular, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Our success will depend to a significant extent on the success achieved by our customers in developing and marketing their products, including their products that use RF modules, color straight-twisted nematic, or STN, LCD modules, TFT LCD modules, and CMOS sensor modules and FPC sub-assemblies, some of which may be new and untested. If our customers’ products become obsolete, fail to gain widespread commercial acceptance or become the subject of intellectual property disputes, this could harm our business and operating results.results could be materially and adversely affected.

Future acquisitions or strategic investments may not be successful and may harm our operating results.

     An important element of our strategy is to review prospects for acquisition or strategic investments that would complement our existing companies and products, augment our market coverage and distribution ability or enhance our technological capabilities.

     Future acquisitions or strategic investments could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results because of:

   possible charges to operating results for purchased technology, restructuring or impairment charges related to goodwill or amortization expenses associated with intangible assets,assets;
 
   potential increase in our expenses and working capital requirements and the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities,liabilities;
 
   difficulties in successfully integrating any acquired operations, technologies, customers products and businesses with our operations,operations;
 
   diversion of our capital and management’s attention to other business concerns,concerns;
 
   risks of entering markets or geographic areas in which we have limited prior experience,experience; or
 
   potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations or inability to hire key employees necessary for expansion.

     For example, in 1998,September 2004, we made a provision for, and subsequently wrote off,an impairment to write down our entire $10.0 million investment in Albatronics (Far East) Company Limited, or Albatronics.Alpha Star Investments Ltd. to its fair value of approximately $3.0 million, based on advice from an external valuer.

Our customers are dependent on shipping companies for delivery of our products and interruptions to shipping could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

     Typically, we sell our products F.O.B. Hong Kong and our customers are responsible for the transportation of products from Hong Kong to their final destinations.     Our customers rely on a variety of carriers for product transportation through various world ports. A work stoppage, strike or shutdown of one or more major ports or airports could result in shipping delays materially and adversely affecting our customers, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Similarly, an increase in freight surcharges due to rising fuel costs or general price increases could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

7


Because our operations are international, we are subject to significant worldwide political, economic, legal and other uncertainties.

     We are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and have subsidiaries incorporated in the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Macao, Japan and China. We have administrative offices in Hong Kong and our People’s Republic of China, or PRC, headquarters are located in Macao, China.Macao. We manufacture all of our products in China. As of December 31, 2003,2004, approximately 76.5%86.7% of the net book value of our total fixed assets is located in China. We sell our products to customers in Hong Kong, North America, Europe, Japan, China and Southeast Asia. Our international operations may be subject to significant political and economic risks and legal uncertainties, including:

   changes in economic and political conditions and in governmental policies,policies;
 
   changes in international and domestic customs regulations,regulations;
 
   wars, civil unrest, acts of terrorism and other conflicts,conflicts;
 
   changes in tariffs, trade restrictions, trade agreements and taxation,taxation;
 
   difficulties in managing or overseeing foreign operations,operations; and
 
   limitations on the repatriation of funds because of foreign exchange controls.

     The occurrence or consequences of any of these factors may restrict our ability to operate in the affected region and decrease the profitability of our operations in that region.

7


Our operating results could be negatively impacted by seasonality.

     Historically, our sales and operating results have been affected by seasonality. Sales of calculators, personal organizers and linguistic products are typically higher during the second and third quarters in anticipation of the start of the school year and the Christmas buying season. Similarly, our consumer servicesconsumers’ orders for electronics products have historically been lower in the first quarter from both the closing of our factories in China for the Chinese New Year holidays and the general reduction in sales following the holiday season. These sales patterns may not be indicative of future sales performance.

Our results could be harmed if we have to comply with new environmental regulations.

     Our operations create some environmentally sensitive waste that may increase in the future depending on the nature of our manufacturing operations. The general issue of the disposal of hazardous waste has received increasing attention from the PRCChinese national and local governments and foreign governments and agencies and has been subject to increasing regulation. Currently, relevant Chinese environmental protection laws and regulations impose fines on discharge of waste materials and empower certain environmental authorities to close any facility which causes serious environmental problems. Although it has not been alleged that we have violated any current environmental regulations by China government officials, there is no assurance that the Chinese government will not amend its current environmental protection laws and regulations. Our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected if we were to increase expenditures to comply with environmental regulations affecting our operations.

IfOur insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover the risks related to our operations and losses.

     We have not experienced any major accidents in the course of our operations which have caused significant property damage or personal injuries. However, there is anno assurance that we will not experience major accidents in the future. Although we have purchased the necessary insurances, including a business interruption policy, a fidelity guarantee policy and policies covering losses or damages in respect of buildings’ machineries, equipments and inventories, the occurance of certain incidents such as earthquake, war and flood, and the consequences resulting from them, may not be covered adequately, or at all, by the insurance policies under which we are protected. We also face exposure to product liability claims in the event that any of our products is alleged to have resulted in property damage, bodily injury or other adverse outcomeeffects. We only have product liability insurance for some of our products. Losses incurred or payments we may be required to make, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations if such losses or payments are not fully insured.

We are a defendant in a putative class action lawsuits and this litigation that has been filed against us,could harm our business could be seriously harmed.regardless of the final outcome.

     On March 11, 2003, we were served with a complaint in an action captionedMichael Rocco v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 1148 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Rocco Action. In addition to Nam Tai, certain directors are named as defendants. On or about April 9, 2003, a second complaint was filed in an action captionedA.J. & Celine Steigler v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 2462 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Steigler Action, and together with the Rocco Action, the Actions. The Actions have been consolidated since July 2003 and purportspurport to represent a putative class of persons who purchased the common stock of Nam Tai from July 29, 2002 through February 18, 2003. Plaintiffs in the Actions assert claims under SectionSections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and allege that misrepresentations and/or omissions were made during the alleged class periodsperiod concerning the partial reversal of an inventory provision and a charge to goodwill related to Nam Tai’s LCD panels and transformers segment, or LPT segment. We have filed aDefendants’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit and thewas denied on September 27, 2004. The putative class action has not been certified as a class action by the court. In any event, our motioncourt but we expect plaintiffs to dismiss was heardseek such certification in November 2003 and we are awaiting the judgment of thenear future. The court thereof.has set May 23, 2005 to hear such a certification motion. Nam Tai believes it has meritorious defenses and it intends to defend the case vigorously. Nam Tai is aware of no other actions that have been filed which relate to these matters. The ultimate outcome of this litigation cannot be presently determined. However, this litigation could be very costly and divert our management’s attention and resources. In addition, we have no insurance covering our liability, if any, or that of our officers and directors, and we will have to pay the costs of the defense. Any adverse determination in this litigation could also subject us to significant liabilities, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

8We depend on our executive officers and skilled management personnel.


We are dependent on certain members     Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of our senior management.

executive officers. Generally, our employees are bound by employment or non-competition agreements. However, we cannot assure you that we will retain our executive officers and other key employees. We are substantially dependent uponcould be seriously harmed by the servicesloss of Mr. Tadao Murakami, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Joseph Li, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Mr. M. K. Koo, our Chief Financial Officer. We have employment agreements with each of Mr. Murakami, Mr. Koo and Mr. Joseph Li. Mr. Murakami’s employment may be terminated immediately and, pursuant to Mr. Koo’s and Mr. Joseph Li’s agreements, their employment may be terminated upon short notice. Mr. Koo’s and Mr. Li’s employment agreements provide that they may not compete with our business nor solicit any of our customers or employees for a period of six months following termination for any reason under the employment agreements. Mr. Murakami’s agreement doesexecutive officers. In order to manage our growth, we will need to recruit and retain additional skilled management personnel and if we are not have comparable provisions. Accordingly, Mr. Murakami may engage in a business that is in competition with us after his termination, which may have a material adverse effect onable to do so our business and operating results.our ability to continue to grow could be harmed. We maintain no key person insurance on these individuals. The loss of the servicesservice of any of these officers or key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business growth and operating results.

We may be unable to succeed in recovering on our judgment debts against Tele-Art.Tele-Art, Inc.

     We have two judgments in our favor against Tele-Art, Inc. awarded by The High Court of Justice in the British Virgin Islands for approximately $35.0 million. Because Tele-Art, Inc. is in liquidation, we may not realize the entire amount of our judgments, and the actual amount of the recovery, if any, is uncertain and dependent on a number of factors. We may incur substantial additional costs in pursuing our recovery, and such costs may not be recoverable.

We could become involved in intellectual property disputes.

     We do not have any patents, licenses, or trademarks material to our business. Instead, we rely on trade secrets, industry expertise and our

8


customers sharing of intellectual property with us. We may be notified that we are infringing patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights owned by other parties. In the event of an infringement claim, we may be required to spend a significant amount of money to develop a non-infringing alternative or to obtain licenses. We may not be successful in developing such an alternative or obtaining a license on reasonable terms, if at all. Any litigation, even without merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

We may not pay dividends in the future.

     Although we have declared dividends during each of the last teneleven years, we may not be able to declare them or may decide not to declare them in the future. Our China subsidiaries are required to reserve 10% of profits for future development, which may affect our ability to declare dividends. We will determine the amounts of the dividends when they are declared and even if dividends are declared in the future, we may not continue them in any future period.

We are subject to the risk of increased taxes.

     We base our tax position upon the anticipated nature and conduct of our business and upon our understanding of the tax laws of the various countries in which we have assets or conduct activities. Our tax position, however, is subject to review and possible challenge by taxing authorities and to possible changes in law. We cannot determine in advance the extent to which some jurisdictions may assess additional tax or interest and penalties on such additional taxes.

     Several places in which we are located allow for tax holidays or provide other tax incentive to attract and retain business. We have obtained holidays or other incentives where available. Our taxes could increase if certain tax holidays or incentives are retracted, or if they are not renewed upon expiration, or tax rates applicable to us in such jurisdictions are otherwise increased.

Recently enacted changes in the securities laws and regulations are likely to increase our costs.

     The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that became law in July 2002 has required changes in some of our corporate governance, securities disclosure and compliance practices. In response to the requirements of that act, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, have promulgated new rules on a variety of subjects. Compliance with these new rules as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has increased our legal, financial and accounting costs, and we expect these increased costs to continue indefinitely, particularly as new rules and regulations, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, come into effect. We also expect these developments to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. Likewise, these developments may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors or qualified executive officers.

Risks Related to Our Operations in China, Hong Kong, Macao and MacaoJapan

     Our manufacturing facilities are located in China and some of our subsidiaries and several of our customers and suppliers are located in Hong Kong and China. Our PRC headquartersSome of our subsidiaries are located in Hong Kong, Macao China.and Japan. As a result, our operations and assets are subject to significant political, economic, legal and other uncertainties associated with doing business in China, Hong Kong, Macao and Macao,Japan, which are discussed in more detail below.

We are exposed to risks associated with doing business in China.

     Our principal manufacturing operations are located in Shenzhen, China. These operations could be severely impacted by evolving interpretation and enforcement of legal standards, by strains on Chinese energy, transportation, communications, trade and other infrastructures, by conflicts, embargoes, increased tensions or escalation of hostilities between China and Taiwan, and by other trade customs and practices that are dissimilar to those in the United States and Europe. Interpretation and enforcement of China’s laws and regulations continue to evolve and we expect differences in interpretation and enforcement to continue in the foreseeable future. Further, we may be exposed to fluctuations in the value of the renminbi yuan, or RMB, the local currency of China. Recently, China has been confronted with international pressure demanding the appreciation of the RMB. Should the Chinese government allow a significant RMB appreciation, our component and other raw material costs could increase and could adversely affect our financial results.

The Chinese government could change its policies toward, or even nationalize, private enterprise, which could harm our business and operating results.

     Over the past several years, the Chinese government has pursued economic reform policies including the encouragement of private economic activities and decentralization of economic regulation with a move towards a market economy. The Chinese government may not continue to pursue these policies or may significantly alter them to our detriment from time to time without notice. Changes in policies by the Chinese government resulting in changes in laws, regulations, or their interpretation, or the imposition of confiscatory taxation, restrictions on currency conversion or imports and sources of supply could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. The nationalization or other expropriation of private enterprises by the Chinese government could result in the total loss of our investment in China.

9


The Chinese legal system has inherent uncertainties that could materially and adversely impact our ability to enforce the agreements governing our factories and to do business.

     We do not own the land on which our factories in China are located. We occupy our principal manufacturing facilities under land use agreements with agencies of the Chinese government and we occupy other facilities under lease agreements with peasant collectives or other companies. The performance of these agreements and the operations of our factories are dependent on our relationship with the local government. Our operations and prospects would be materially and adversely affected by the failure of the local government to honor these agreements or an adverse change in the law governing them. In the event of a dispute, enforcement of these agreements could be difficult in China. Unlike the United States, China has a civil law system based on written statutes in which judicial decisions have limited precedential value. The Chinese government has enacted laws and regulations dealing with economic matters such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. However, its experience in implementing, interpreting and enforcing these laws and regulations is limited, and our ability to enforce commercial claims or to resolve commercial disputes in China is unpredictable. These matters may be subject to the exercise of considerable discretion by agencies of the Chinese government, and forces and factors unrelated to the legal merits of a particular matter or dispute may influence their determination.

Fire, severe weather, flood or earthquake could cause significant damage to our facilities in China and disrupt our business operations.

     Our products are manufactured exclusively at our factories located in China. Fire fighting and disaster relief or assistance in China is not well developed. Material damage to, or the loss of, our factories due to fire, severe weather, flood, earthquake or other acts of God or cause may not be adequately covered by proceeds of our insurance coverage and could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. In addition, any interruptions to our business caused by such disasters could harm our business and operating results.

Controversies affecting China’s trade with the United States could harm our results of operations or depress our stock price.

     While China has been granted permanent most favored nation trade status in the United States through its entry into the World Trade Organization, controversies between the United States and China may arise that threaten the status quo involving trade between the United States and China. These controversies could materially and adversely affect our business by, among other things, causing our products in the United States to become more expensive resulting in a reduction in the demand for our products by customers in the United States. Political or trade friction between the United States and China, whether or not actually affecting our business, could also materially and adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common shares.

Changes to Chinese tax laws and heightened efforts by the Chinese tax authorities to increase revenues could subject us to greater taxes.

     Under applicable Chinese law, we have been afforded a number of tax concessions by, and tax refunds from, the Chinese tax authorities on a substantial portion of our operations in China by reinvesting all or part of the profits attributable to our Chinese manufacturing operations. However, the Chinese tax system is subject to substantial uncertainties with respect to its interpretation and enforcement. Following the Chinese government’s program of privatizing many state-owned enterprises, the Chinese government has oftemptedattempted to augment its revenues through heightened tax collection efforts. Continued efforts by the Chinese government to increase tax revenues could result in decisions or interpretations of the tax laws by the Chinese tax authorities that would increase our future tax liabilities or deny us expected concessions or refunds. For example, the tax reform of reducing the VAT tax refund from 17% to 13%, with effect from January 1, 2004, may affecthas adversely affected our margins.

Our results have been affected by changes in currency exchange rates. Changes in currency rates involving the Japanese yen, Hong Kong dollar or Chinese renminbi could increase our expenses.

     Our financial results have been affected by currency fluctuations, resulting in total foreign exchange gains of $189,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004, total foreign exchange losses of $62,000 during the year ended December 31, 2003 and total foreign exchange losses of $345,000 during the year ended December 31, 2002 and total foreign exchange gains of $530,000 during the year ended December 31, 2001.2002. We sell most of our products in United States dollars and pay our expenses in United States dollars, Japanese yen, Hong Kong dollars, and Chinese renminbi. While we face a variety of risks associated with changes among the relative value of these currencies, we believe the most significant exchange risk presently results from material purchases we make in Japanese yen. Approximately 16%8%, 8%16% and 16%6% of our material costs have been in Japanese yen during the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, respectively, but sales made in Japanese yen accounted for less than 11% of sales for each of the last three years. An appreciation of the Japanese yen against the U.S.United States dollar would increase our expenses when translated into U.S.United States dollars and would materially and adversely affect our margins unless we made sufficient sales in Japanese yen to offset against material purchases made in Japanese yen.

10


     Approximately less than8% and 6% of our revenues and 12% and 12% of our expenses were in Chinese renminbi and Hong Kong dollars, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2004. Approximately 1% and 8% of our revenuerevenues and 13% and 12% of our expenses were in Chinese renminbi and Hong Kong dollars, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2003. Approximately 4% and 10% of our revenues and 18% and 15% of our expenses were in Chinese renminbi and Hong Kong dollars, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2002. An appreciation of the Chinese renminbi or Hong Kong dollar against the U.S.United States dollar would increase our expenses when translated into U.S.United States dollars and could materially and adversely affect our margins. In addition, a significant devaluation in the Chinese renminbi or Hong Kong dollar could harm our business if it destabilizes the economy of China or Hong Kong, creates serious domestic problems or increases our borrowing costs.

10


We have suffered losses from hedging against our currency exchange risk.

     From time to time, we have attempted to hedge our currency exchange risk. We did not engage in currency hedging transactions for fiscal year 20022003 and 2003.2004. We have experienced in the past and may experience in the future losses as a result of currency hedging.

Political and economic instability in Hong Kong could harm our operations.

     Some of our subsidiaries’ offices and several of our customers and suppliers are located in Hong Kong, formerly a British Crown Colony. Sovereignty over Hong Kong was resumed by China effective July 1, 1997. Since then, Hong Kong has become a Special Administrative Region of China, enjoying a high degree of autonomy except for foreign and defense affairs. Moreover, China’s political system and policies are not practiced in Hong Kong. Under the principle of “one country, two systems,”systems”, Hong Kong maintains a legal system that is based on the common law and is different from that of China. It is generally acknowledged as an open question whether Hong Kong’s future prosperity in its role as a hub and gateway to China after China’s recent accession to the World Trade Organization (introducing a market liberalization in China) will be diminished. The continued stability of political, economic or commercial conditions in Hong Kong remains uncertain, and any instability could materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome or similar illnesses may have a negative impact on our business and operating results.

     In March 2003, several economies in Asia, including Hong Kong and southern China, where our operations are located, were affected by the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS. Since January 2004, there has been a total of six confirmed SARS cases in southern China, Taiwan and Singapore. If there is a recurrence of a serious outbreak of SARS, it may adversely affect our business and operating results. For example, the future SARS outbreak could result in quarantines or closures to some of our factories if our employees are infected with SARS and ongoing concerns regarding SARS, particularly its effect on travel, could negatively impact our China-based customers and suppliers and our business and operating results.

     In addition, there has recently been an outbreak of avian influenza in humans in both ThailandAsian countries, including Vietnam, South Korea and Vietnam,Japan, which has proven fatal in some instances. As the human death toll continues to grow, many are concerned that the virus will mutate and trigger a human pandemic. If such an outbreak were to spread to southern China, where our operation facilities are located, it may adversely affect our business operating results.

We conduct operations in a number of countries and the effect of business, legal and political risks associated with international operations could significantly harm us.

We conduct operations in number of countries. There are risks inherent in doing business in international markets, including:

•   Difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
•   Compliance with laws and regulations, including environmental laws, which vary from country to country and over time, increasing the costs of compliance and potential risks of non-compliance;
•   Exposure to political and financial instability, leading to currency exchange losses, collection difficulties or other losses;
•   Exposure to fluctuations in the value of local currencies;
•   Changes in value-added tax or VAT reimbursement;
•   Imposition of currency exchange controls; and
•   Delays from customs brokers or government agencies.

Any of these risks could significantly harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Risks Related to Our Industry

We are exposed to general economic conditions. The currentAny slowdown in the technology products industry has affected and we expect it to continue tomay affect our business and operating results adversely.

     As a result of the economic downturn in the United States and internationally, and reduced capital spending, sales to OEMs in the electronics industry declined beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2001 and continuing through 2002. Lower consumer

11


demand and high customer inventory levels have resulted in the delay and cancellation of orders for nearly all types of electronic products. As a result of order cancellations in 2001, we were required to write-downwrite down slow-moving inventory, which materially and adversely impacted our net income in 2001. Although the industry experienced a recovery in 2003 and 2004, we cannot assure that this recovery is sustainable or that the industry will not further decline. If the economic conditions in the United States or the other markets we serve worsen, orparticularly in the electronics and contract manufacturing businesses particularly, or if a wider or global economic slowdown occurs, this could materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.

The current economic downturn in11


Our business and operating results are dependent on growing global outsourcing trends.

     Over the last two decades, the EMS industry could continueexperienced rapid change and growth as the capabilities of EMS companies continued to have a material adverse effectexpand and consumer electronic product manufacturers adopted, and became increasingly reliant on, our business and operating results.

     Inmanufacturing outsourcing strategies to remain competitive. Despite the slow down of the EMS industry in 2001 and 2002 the EMS industry wasas a result of consumer electronic product manufacturers’ decreasing production requirement, growth has been renewed in an economic slowdown with an uncertain outlook. Some of the major contract manufacturers2003 and OEMs worldwide had announced job reductions2004 and plant closures aimed at reducing costs. Industry analysts had reduced their projections of the future growth of the EMS segment. Furthermore, Wall Street analysts had reduced earnings and revenue estimates across the entire EMS sector and had reportedwe believe that the EMS industry had excess capacity. For example,has the EMS industry in which we operate experiencedpotential for further growth as many consumer electronic product manufacturers continue to favor outsourcing over internal manufacturing, and the market for outsourcing, as a decrease in demand in 2001 and 2002. Softening demand for our products and services caused by the ongoing economic downturn was responsible in part for a decline in our operating income in 2001, as well as our write-down for slow-moving inventory. Although the industry experienced a recovery in 2003, we cannot assure that this recovery is sustainable orwhole, continues to flourish. However, there can be no assurance that the industrytrends of adopting manufacturing outsourcing strategies by consumer electronic product manufacturers will not further decline.

     The global economy may remain weak and market conditions continue to be challenging ingrow. If the EMS industry. As a result, individuals and companies may continue delaying or reducing expenditures, including those for electronic products. Further delays or reductions in spending in our industry in particular, and economic weakness generally,growing outsourcing trends discontinue, this could materially and adversely affectimpact our business and operating results.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Shares

The market price of our shares will likely be subject to substantial price and volume fluctuations.

     The markets for equity securities have been volatile and the price of our common shares has been and could continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to variations in operating results, news announcements, trading volume, sales of common shares by our officers, directors and our principal shareholders, customers, suppliers or other publicly traded companies, general market trends both domestically and internationally, currency movements and interest rate fluctuations. Certain events, such as the issuance of common shares upon the exercise of our outstanding stock options could also materially and adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common shares.

     Further, the stock markets have recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of equity securities of many companies and that have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. These fluctuations may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

The concentration of share ownership in our senior management allows them to control or substantially influence the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval.

     On March 1, 2004,February 28, 2005, members of our management and Board of Directors as a group beneficially owned approximately 37.9%42.0% of our common shares. As a result, acting together, they may be able to control and substantially influence the outcome of all matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This ability may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Nam Tai, or causing a change in control of Nam Tai that may not be favored by our other shareholders.

If we do not receive an unqualified opinion on the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and future year-ends as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our shares.

     As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on the company’s internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 20-F that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting. In addition, the public accounting firm auditing the company’s financial statements must attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting. While we intend to conduct a rigorous review of our internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting in order to assure compliance with Section 404 requirements, if our independent auditors interpret Section 404 requirements and the related rules and regulations differently from us or if our independent auditors are not satisfied with our internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting or with the level at which it is documented, operated or reviewed, they may decline to attest to management’s assessment or issue a qualified report. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could cause the market price of our shares to decline.

Changes to financial accounting standards may affect our reported results of operations and could result in a decrease in the value of our shares.

     The Financial Accounting Standards Board recently published amendments to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 that would require stock-based compensation issued to employees to be treated as compensation expense using the fair value method. If we are required to record an expense for our stock-based compensation plans using the fair value method, we would incur significant compensation charges. Although we currently are not required to record any compensation expense in connection with options granted that have an exercise price equal to fair market value of our common stock at the grant date, if future laws and regulations require us to treat all stock-based compensation as a compensation expense using the fair value method, our results or operations could be adversely affected. For discussion of our employee stock option and employee stock purchase plans, see Note 2 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Stock Options” and Note 11 – “Shareholders’ Equity” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

12


Risks Related to Our Foreign Private Issuer Status

It may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against our management or us.

     We are a British Virgin Islands holding corporation having our PRC headquarters in Macao, China and some of ourwith subsidiaries in Hong Kong.Kong, Macao, Japan and China. We have appointed Stephen Seung, 2 Mott Street, Suite 601, New York, New York 10013 as our agent upon whom process may be served in any action brought against us under the securities laws of the United States. However, outside the United States, it may be difficult for investors to enforce judgments against us obtained in the United States in any of these actions, including actions based upon civil liability provisions of the Federal securities laws. In addition, all of our officers and most of our directors reside outside the United States, and all of our assets, and the assets of those persons who reside outside of the United States, are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon those persons, or to enforce against those persons or ususe judgments obtained in United States courts grounded upon the liability provisions of the United States securities laws. There is substantial doubt as to the enforceability against us or any of our directors and officers located outside of the United States in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of United States courts of liabilities based solely on the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States.

12


     No treaty exists between Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands and the United States providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. However, the courts of Hong Kong and the British Virgin Islands are generally prepared to accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due. An action may then be commenced in Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands for recovery of this debt. A Hong Kong or British Virgin Islands court will only accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due if:

   the judgment is for a liquidated amount in a civil matter;
 
   the judgment is final and conclusive and has not been stayed or satisfied in full;
 
   the judgment is not, directly or indirectly, for the payment of foreign taxes, penalties, fines or charges of a like nature (in this regard, a Hong Kong or British Virgin Islands court is unlikely to accept a judgment for an amount obtained by doubling, trebling or otherwise multiplying a sum assessed as compensation for the loss or damage sustained by the person in whose favor the judgment was given);
 
   the judgment was not obtained by actual or constructive fraud or duress;
 
   the foreign court has taken jurisdiction on grounds that are recognized by the common law rules as to conflict of laws in Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands;
 
   the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice (i.e., the concept of fair adjudication);
 
   the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained, the judgment itself and the enforcement of the judgment are not contrary to the public policy of Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands;
 
   the person against whom the judgment is given is subject to the jurisdiction of the Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands court; and
 
   the judgment is not on a claim for contribution in respect of damages awarded by a judgment, which does not satisfy the criteria stated previously.

     Enforcement of a foreign judgment in Hong Kong or the British Virgin Islands may also be limited or affected by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, arrangement and moratorium, or similar laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally, and will be subject to a statutory limitation of time within which proceedings may be brought.

     No treaty exists between Macao and the United States providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. However, the courts of Macao are generally prepared to accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due. An action may then be commenced in Macao for recovery of this debt. A Macao court will only accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due if:

   there is no doubt to the authenticity of the judgment documents and the understanding of the judgment;
 
   pursuant to the law of the place of judgment, the judgment is final and conclusive;
 
   the judgment was not obtained by fraud or the matter in relation to the judgment is not within the exclusive jurisdiction of Macao courts;

13


 
   the judgment will not be challenged on the ground that the relevant matter has been adjudicated by the Macao court, except matters which have first been adjudicated by courts outside Macao;
 
   pursuant to the law of the place of the judgment, the defendant has been summoned and the proceedings in which the judgment was obtained were not contrary to natural justice; and
 
   the enforcement of the judgment will not cause any orders that may result in apparent public disorder.

     Enforcement of a foreign judgment in Macao may also be limited or affected by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, arrangement and moratorium, or similar laws relating to or affecting creditors’ rights generally, and will be subject to a statutory limitation of time within which proceedings may be brought.

13


Future issuances of preference shares could materially and adversely affect the holders of our common shares or delay or prevent a change of control.

     Our Board of Directors may amend our Memorandum and Articles of Association without shareholder approval to create from time to time and issue one or more classes of preference shares (which are analogous to preferred stock of corporations organized in the United States). While currently no preference shares are issued or outstanding, we may issue preference shares in the future. Future issuance of preference shares could materially and adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common shares, or delay or prevent a change of control.

Our status as a foreign private issuer exempts us from certain of the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and corporate governance standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, limiting the protections and information afforded to investors.

     We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As such, we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States public companies including:

   the rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requiring the filing with the CommissionSEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K or annual reports on Form 10-K;
 
   the sections of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
 
   the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information; and
 
   the sections of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insider liability for profits realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equity securities within less than six months).

     In addition, because the Company is a foreign private issuer, certain of the corporate governance standards of the NYSE that are applied to domestic companies listed on that exchange may not be appliedapplicable to us.

     Because of these exemptions, investors are not afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States or traded on the NYSE.

Item 4.Information on the Company

History and Development of Nam Tai

     Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. was founded in 1975 and moved its manufacturing facilities to the People’s Republic of China, or China in 1980 to take advantage of lower overhead costs, lower material costs and competitive labor rates available and subsequently relocated to Shenzhen, China in order to capitalize on opportunities offered in Southernsouthern China. We were reincorporated as a limited liability International Business Company under the laws of the British Virgin Islands in August 1987. Our principal manufacturing and design operations are based in Shenzhen, China, approximately 30 miles from Hong Kong. Our PRC headquarters are located inis at Macao, China. Some of our subsidiaries’ offices are located in Hong Kong and Macao, which provides us access to Hong Kong’s and Macao’s infrastructure of communication and banking and facilitates management of our China operations and transportationoperations. One of our products out of China through the port of Hong Kong.

14


subsidiaries also has an office in Japan.

     Our corporate administrative matters are conducted in the British Virgin Islands through our registered agent, McW. Todman & Co., McNamara Chambers, P.O. Box 3342, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Stephen Seung, 2 Mott Street, Suite 601, New York, New York 10013. Our principal executive offices are located in the British Virgin Islands at 116 Main Street, 3rd Floor, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands, and the telephone number is (284) 494-7752.

     In 1978, Mr. Koo, the founder of the Company, began recruiting operating executives from the Japanese electronics industry. These executives brought years of experience in Japanese manufacturing methods, which emphasize quality, precision, and efficiency in manufacturing. Senior management currently includes Japanese professionals who provide technical expertise and work closely with both our Japanese component suppliers and customers.

     For a number of years, we specialized in manufacturing large-volume, hand-held digital consumer electronic products and established a leading position in electronic calculators and handheld organizers for OEMs such as Texas Instruments Incorporated and Sharp Corporation. Over the years, we have broadened our product mix to include a range of digital products for business and personal use, as well as key components and subassembliessub-assemblies for telecommunications and consumer electronic products. In August 1999, we established Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd.,Company Limited, which targetstargeted the expanding market for telecommunications components including LCD modules as well as end products, including cordless phones and family radio systems. Nowadays, color and monochrome LCD modules to displaydisplaying information have become one of our major products. Since December 2002, we have also produced RF modules for integration into cellular phones and other hand-held consumer electronic products, such as personal digital assistants, or PDAs, laptop computers and other products with wireless connectivity. In 2003, we further diversified our product mix by manufacturing CMOS sensor modules for integration into various image

14


capturing devices such as digital cameras for cellular phones and home entertainment products, flexible printed circuit, or FPC subassembliessub-assemblies for integration into various LCD modules, front light panels for handheld video game devices and digital camera accessories for use with the cellular phones and home entertainment products. In 2004, we expanded our business on CMOS sensor modules and FPC sub-assemblies. We also further broadened our product line by manufacturing back light panels for handheld video game devices and BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory for cellular phones.

     In September 2000, we acquired for $2.0 million a 5% indirect shareholding in both TCL Mobile Communication (HK) Co., Ltd. and Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., together known as TCL Mobile, through the acquisition of 25% of the outstanding shares of Mate Fair Group Limited, or Mate Fair, a privately held investment holding company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands with a 20% shareholding interest in TCL Mobile. TCL Mobile is engaged in manufacturing, distributing and trading of digital mobile phones and accessories in China as well as in overseas markets. In October 2002, we began to provide TCL Mobile with mobile LCD modules used in its mobile phones.

     In October 2000, we completed the acquisition of the J.I.C. Group (BVI) Limited. The J.I.C. Group (B.V.I.)(BVI) Limited and its subsidiaries, or the J.I.C. Group, are principally engaged in the manufacture and marketing of transformers and LCD panels, a key component for a variety of consumer electronic products. Of the purchase price of $32.8 million, we paid $11.0 million in cash and issued 3.48 million of our common shares.

     In November 2002, Mate Fair sold a portion of its equity interest in Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. for which we received proceeds of approximately $10.4 million, reducing our direct equity interest (held through Mate Fair) in TCL Mobile to approximately 3%. In November 2002, we invested $5.1 million of the proceeds in TCL International Holdings Limited’s 3% convertible notes that are due in November 2005. In August 2003, we disposed of those convertible notes to independent third parties and received proceeds of approximately $5.03 million in cash. TCL International Holdings Limited is another company in the TCL Group, which consists of the TCL Corporation and its subsidiaries, and is publicly listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, or the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

     In January 2002, we acquired a 6% equity interest in TCL Corporation (formerly known as TCL Holdings Corporation Ltd.), for a considerconsideration of approximately $12.0 million. TCL Corporation, an enterprise established in the PRC,China, is the parent company of the TCL Group of companies. TCL Corporation changed from a limited liability company to a company limited by shares in April 2002. In January 2004, TCL Corporation listed its A-shares on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange at Chinese renminbiRMB 4.26 (equivalent to $0.52) per A-share. The Company’s interest in TCL Corporation has since been diluted to 3.69% and represents 95.52 million promoter’s shares of TCL Corporation after its initial public offering.

15


Pursuant to Article 147 of the Company Law of China, the Company is restricted from transferring its promoter’s shares within three years from the establishment date. The Company is, however, entitled to receive dividends and other rights similar to holders of A-shares. As these promoter’s shares have a restriction on their sale prior to April 2005, the Company hired an independent valuer to determine the fair value of these shares as of December 31, 2004 and recognized an unrealized gain of $6.55 million, which has been recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, based on the Company’s cost of $11.97 million and an estimated fair value of $20.70 million.

     In January 2002, we entered into a transaction which resulted in the listing of a company holding J.I.C. Group’s business on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. To effect the transaction, we entered into an agreement with the liquidators of Albatronics, whose shares had been listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and which was placed into voluntary liquidation in August 1999. Under the agreement, we agreed to transfer the J.I.C. Group into J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, a new company, for a controlling interest in J.I.C. Technology Company Limited. Albatronics’ listing status on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange was withdrawn and J.I.C. Technology Company Limited was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange free from the liabilities of Albatronics. This arrangement was more cost effective than using an initial public offering. For our contribution to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, we received a combination of ordinary and preference shares, which are analogous to common stock and convertible preferred stock, respectively, of companies organized under U.S.United States law and which upon their full conversion, could result in us, the creditors and the Hong Kong public owning approximately 92.9%, 5.8% and 1.3%, respectively, of the outstanding ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited. On June 4, 2002, the reverse merger was completed and all the shares of Albatronics were transferred to the liquidators for a nominal consideration. The preference shares are non-redeemable, non-voting shares that rankpari passu with ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited on the payment of dividends or other distribution other than on a winding-up. No holder of preference shares (including Nam Tai) may convert them if such conversion would result in the minimum public float of 25%, which required (required under the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing Rules,Rules) not being met. In August 2002, we acquired an additional 7,984,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for a cash consideration of $437,000. During the period from June to November 2003, we disposed of a total of 42,600,000 ordinary shares for cash consideration of $4.0 million. In November 2003, we converted 175,100,000 preference shares into 170,000,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.

     During the period from November to December 2004, we further disposed of a total of 128,000,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for cash consideration of $12.95 million. The disposal resulted in a net gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary of $6.25 million and the release of unamortized goodwill of $3.52 million. During the same period, we converted all 423,320,000 preference shares into 410,990,290 ordinary shares. As of December 31, 2003,2004, we held 263,900,688546,890,978 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, equivalent to 74.86%71.63% of issued ordinary shares, and 423,320,000 preference shares. Upon full conversion of the preference shares owned, we will hold approximately 88.39% of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.

     In January 2003, we invested $10.0 million for a 25% equity interest in Alpha Star Investments Ltd., the ultimate holding company of JCT Wireless Technology Limited, or JCT. JCT is engaged in the design, development and marketing of wireless communication terminals and wireless application software and is using us to manufacture wireless communication terminals and their related modules for JCT.modules. As of December 31, 2003,2004, we recognized net sales of $20.8$34.2 million to JCT for 2003.the year. However, in September 2004, we made an impairment to write down our $10.0 million investment in Alpha Star to a fair value of approximately $3.0 million. As of December 31, 2004, another analysis had been conducted by an independent valuer, who determined that no further impairment to value was required.

15


     In January 2003, we disposed of 20% of our equity interest in Namtek Software Development Company Limited to a company that is owned by the management of Namtek Software Development Company Limited for a cash consideration of $160,000. As of the date of disposal, Namtek Software Development Company Limited was fair valued at $3.3 million.

     On January 23, 2003, the listing of our shares was transferred to the NYSE from the NASDAQ National Market with symbol of “NTE”. On June 30, 2003, we implemented a three-for-one stock split with both the stock size and market price to be divided by three. As of December 31, 2003,2004, there were 41,231,27242,664,536 common shares outstanding.

     In June 2003, one of our subsidiaries, J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, disposed of its transformers operation to a third party for a cash consideration of $2.4 million. The gain from disposal of this discontinued operation amounted to $2.0 million, net of $0.1 million shared by minority interest.

     In August 2003, we set up our PRC headquartersfirst subsidiary, Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited in Macao due toas our continuous increase in investment in China.PRC headquarters. Macao, like Hong Kong, is a special administrative region of the China and has recently introduced an incentive program to attract investment to Macao. In March and November 2004, we further established Zastron (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited and J.I.C. (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited in Macao.Macao, respectively.

     In November 2003, our common shares were listed in the Regulated Unofficial Market (Freiverkehr) on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, in Germany. The stocks are being traded on Xetra, the Deutsche Borse AG electronic trading system under the stock symbol of “884852”.

     In December 2003, we placed approximately $5.3 million into an escrow account for an investment in Stepmind. The investment will bewas to occur in two phases. For the first phase, approximately $2.64 million, representing 7.66% of the equity interest in Stepmind, was released to Stepmind in January 2004. The second phase amounting to approximately $2.65 million will bewas released to Stepmind in August 2004 subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. Upon successfulIn August 2004, we disposed of our entire interest in Stepmind to one of the shareholders of Stepmind at the original subscription price for those shares.

     In April 2004, we increased our shareholding in TCL Mobile from approximately 3% to 9% through the acquisition of Jasper Ace Limited, or Jasper Ace, which directly holds a 9% equity interest in TCL Mobile, for a consideration of approximately $102.2 million. The consideration was satisfied by the exchange of our 72.2% equity interest in Mate Fair, plus cash of $25 million in cash, and the issuance of 1,416,764 new Nam Tai shares and resulted in a net investment cost of $79.5 million. In July 2004, Nam Tai transferred all its shares in TCL Mobile to TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, or TCL Communication, in exchange for 90 shares of TCL Communication. In August 2004, we further subscribed for 254,474,910 shares in TCL Communication at a consideration of approximately $16 million. The consideration was satisfied by the dividend receivable from TCL Communication. Together with the 90 shares it received in July 2004, Nam Tai in total holds 254,475,000 shares in TCL Communication, representing 9% of the shareholding of TCL Communication. In September 2004, shares of TCL Communication were listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange by way of introduction. There were no new shares issued or sold in connection with the listing, and therefore no dilution to Nam Tai’s original stake in TCL Communication. As of December 31, 2004, we still hold 254,475,000 shares, representing 9% of the total issued shares of TCL Communication.

     As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s investment in TCL Communication was stated at fair value based on the traded market price of TCL Communication’s shares. The Company recognized an unrealized loss of $58.3 million in its consolidated statements of income based on the Company’s cost of $79.5 million and a fair value of $21.2 million.

     In April 2004, shares of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited, or NTEEP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, were listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Since all of the shares of NTEEP involved in the second phase, our total investment will represent 11.33%initial public offering, or IPO, were existing shares of NTEEP owned by Nam Tai, all of the equity interestproceeds raised in Stepmind. Stepmindthe IPO went to Nam Tai instead of NTEEP. The offer price of NTEEP’s share was founded$0.497, which resulted in July 2000net proceeds of approximately $92.8 million and is a fabless solutions and components supplier, developing applications which require high performance and secured data links.

16


gain of approximately $71.1 million to the Company. As of December 31, 2004, we held 600,000,000 shares of NTEEP, representing 75% of the total issued shares of NTEEP.

     Also refer to the section of this Report entitled Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects for a further discussion of our investments and acquisitions.

     An important element of our strategy is to acquire companies that would complement our existing products and services, augment our market coverage and sales ability or enhance our technological capabilities. Accordingly, we may acquire additional businesses, products or technologies in the future or make investments in related businesses for strategic business purposes.

Capital Expenditures

     Our principal capital expenditures and divestitures over the last three years include the following:

             
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
Property, plant and equipment (net) $36,013,000   18,485,000   17,053,000 

16


             
  2002 2003 2004
Property, plant and equipment (net) $18,485,000   17,053,000   38,611,000 

Our major capital expenditure in 2004 included:

•   $13.8 million for new factory expansion;
•   $7.7 million for the expansion of an LCD factory (which included 5.8 million paid as a deposit for fixed assets);
•   $0.7 million for the expansion of our high-resolution color LCD module production capacity;
•   $14.5 million for machineries used mainly for FPC sub-assemblies;
•   $5.6 million for other capital equipment; and
•   $2.1 million for construction work in relation to the electricity supply for Nam Tai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

Our major capital expenditures in 2003 included:

   $6.0 million for machinery for manufacturing RF modules,modules;
 
   $1.2 million for new factory expansion,expansion;
 
   $0.4 million for machinery on FPC sub-assembly,sub-assemblies;
 
   $1.7 million for expansion of our high resolutionhigh-resolution color LCD module production capacity,capacity;
 
   $6.7 million for other capital equipment,equipment; and
 
   $1.1 million for construction of a new trade union building for the use of our workers in China.

Our major capital expenditures in 2002 included:

   $12.3 million for a new STN LCD panel production line,line; and
 
   $4.0 million for completion of the new factory expansion.

     Our major capital expenditures in 2001 included:

$13.0 million for the purchase and interior improvements on 24,200 square feet of contiguous prime office space at Shun Tak Centre in the Central district of Hong Kong,
$6.4 million for the purchase of new staff residences in Hong Kong,
$5.5 million for the construction and machinery for a new 138,000 square foot five-story factory building within the Company’s existing manufacturing complex,
$5.5 million for the purchase of new chip on glass production lines, and
$2.0 million for the additions to and improvement of the production facilities for producing LCD products.

In order to expand production capacity, we are buildinghave built a new factory consisting of approximately 250,000265,000 square feet adjacent to our principal manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen, China. The construction commencedwas completed in September 2003December 2004 and we expect constructionfull operations to be completed by the endcommence in April 2005. As of the fourth quarter in 2004. We have budgeted $40.0December 31, 2004, we had spent $15.0 million to cover the cost of construction, and fixtures and equipment for the new factory, of which $1.2 million has already been spent in 2003. We plan to financefactory. The financing for these improvements to our manufacturing facilities were obtained from cashinternal resources. In October 2004, our existing production facility for the LCD panels segment also relocated to new factory premises which are approximately 670,000 square feet and twice the size of the former factory premises. This new factory provides room for the future expansion of production capacity. As of December 31, 2004, we had spent $7.7 million for this relocation and financed this amount with a combination of internal resources and banking facilities.bank financing.

Other capital expenditures we have planned for 20042005 include:

17


   $6.7 8.0 million for machinery for manufacturing RF modules,land purchase;
 
   $2.016.5 million for the expansion of our high resolution color LCD module production capacity,new factory expansion;
 
   $3.914.0 million for machinery for FPC subassembly,machinery; and
 
   $6.54.5 million for expansion of our LCD factory.other equipment.

     Our plans for capital expenditures are subject to change from time to time and could result from, among other things, our consummation of any significant amount of additional acquisition or strategic investment opportunities, which we regularly explore.

Business Overview

     We are an electronics manufacturing and design services provider to a select group of the world’s leading OEMs of telecommunications and consumer electronic products. Through our electronics manufacturing services operations, we manufacture electronic components and subassemblies,sub-assemblies, including LCD panels, LCD modules, RF modules, FPC subassembliessub-assemblies and image sensors.sensors modules. These components are used in numerous electronic products, including cellular phones, laptop computers, digital cameras, copiers, fax machines, electronic toys, handheld video game devices and microwave ovens. We also manufacture finished products, including cellular phones, palm-sized PCs, personal digital assistants, electronic dictionaries, calculators, and digital camera accessories and BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory for use with cellular phones.

     We assist our OEM customers in the design and development of their products and furnish full turnkey manufacturing services that utilize advanced manufacturing processes and production technologies. Our services include hardware and software design, component purchasing, assembly into finished products or electronic subassembliessub-assemblies and post-assembly testing. These services are value-added and assist us in

17


obtaining new business but do not represent a material component of our revenue. We also provide original design manufacturing, or ODM, services, in which we design and develop proprietary products that are sold by our OEM customers using their brand name.

     We were founded in 1975 as an electronic products trading company based in Hong Kong and shifted our focus to manufacturing of electronic products in 1978. We moved our manufacturing facilities to China in 1980 to take advantage of lower overhead costs, lower material costs and competitive labor rates, available and subsequently relocatedrelocating to Shenzhen, China in order to capitalize on opportunities offered in Southernsouthern China. We were reincorporated as a limited liability International Business Company under the laws of the British Virgin Islands in August 1987. Our principal manufacturing and design operations are based in Shenzhen, China, approximately 30 miles from Hong Kong. Our PRC headquarters are located in Macao, China. Some of our subsidiaries’ offices are located in Hong Kong and Macao, which provides us access to Hong Kong’s and Macao’s infrastructure of communication and banking and facilitates management of our China operations and transportationoperations. One of our products out of China through the port of Hong Kong.subsidiaries also has an office in Japan.

Our Customers

     Historically, we have had substantial recurring sales from existing customers. About 89.1%89.4% of our 20032004 net sales came from customers that also used our services in 2002.2003. While we seek to diversify our customer base, a small number of customers currently generate a significant portion of our sales. Sales to our 10 largest customers accounted for 83.7%84.8%, 84.8%84.9% and 84.9%82.5% of our net sales during the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, respectively. Sales to customers accounting for 10% or more of our net sales in the year ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 or 20032004 were as follows:

             
  Year ended
  December 31,
  
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
Epson Precision (HK) Ltd.  29.9%  32.2%  24.8%
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB  *   16.9   11.3%
Texas Instruments Incorporated  14.2   11.1   * 
Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd  *   *   10.6%


*Less than 10% of our total net sales.

18

             
      Year ended    
      December 31,    
  2002  2003  2004 
Epson Precision (HK) Ltd.  32.2%  24.8%  14.1%
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB  16.9%  11.3%  * 
Texas Instruments Incorporated  11.1%  *   * 
Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd  *   10.6%  * 
Motorola Inc.  *   *   10.2%
Sharp Corporation  *   *   13.5%
Wuxi Sharp Electronic Components Co., Ltd.  *   *   10.1%


* Less than 10% of our total net sales.

     Our largest OEM customers based on net sales during 20032004 include the following (listed alphabetically):

   
Customer
 Products

Advance Watch Co. (Far East) Ltd.
 
LCD panels for watches
Appeal Telecom Co., LtdLtd. CMOS sensor modules
Canon Electronic Business Machines (H.K.) Co. LtdLtd. Electronic dictionaries, calculators, PDAs and calculatorsdictionaries, LCD panel sub-assemblies for copy machines and software development
Epson Precision (H.K.) Ltd. LCD modules for cellular phones and FPC sub-assemblies
Goyo Paper Working Co., LtdLtd. Game front light panel and back light panel assembly
Hitachi Media Electronics Co. Ltd(1)Transformers
JCT Wireless Technology LimitedLtd. RF modules and cellular phones in semi-knocked down, or SKD, form
Kanda Tsushin Kogyo Co LtdLtd. (affiliate of Fujitsu) Caller ID functionAssemblies for cordless phones
Mobile Soft Tech, LtdMotorola Inc. Attached CameraCMOS sensor modules
Nanox Ltd. LCD panels for cordless phones and household appliances
Nishimura Musen Denki Co. Ltd(1)National Electronic & Watch Company Ltd. Transformers
Omnivision Technologies, Inc.PC Camera, CMOS sensor modulesLCD panels
Optrex Corporation Assemblies for LCD modules
Polar GroupLCD panels
Seiko Instruments Inc. Electronic dictionaries and PDAs, software development
Sharp Corporation Calculators, pocket computersFPC sub-assemblies, calculators, PDAs and control panel modulesdictionaries
Sony Computer Entertainment Europe LimitedLtd. Home entertainment products
Sony Corporation Electronic dictionaries and software development
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB Mobile phone digital camera accessories, BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory
Stanley Electric (Asia Pacific) Ltd. LCD panels for car audio devices
Texas Instruments Incorporated Calculators
Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd. LCD modules for cellular phones
Uniden HK Ltd.LCD panels
Wuxi Sharp Electronic Components Co. LtdLtd. Telecom printed circuit board, or PCB, modules and FPC sub-assemblies

18


(1)We sold our transformers operation to a third party in June 2003.

     At any given time, different customers account for a significant portion of our business. Percentages of net sales to customers vary from quarter to quarter and year to year and fluctuate depending on the timing of production cycles for particular products.

     Sales to our OEM customers are primarily based on purchase orders we receive from time to time rather than firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers. Although it is our general practice to purchase raw materials only upon receiving a purchase order, for certain customers we will occasionally purchase raw materials based on such customers’ rolling forecasts. Uncertain economic conditions and our general lack of long-term purchase commitments with our customers make it difficult for us to accurately predict revenue over the longer term. Even in those cases where customers are contractually obligated to purchase products from us or repurchase unused inventory from us, we may elect not to immediately enforce our contractual rights because of the long-term nature of our customer relationships and for other business reasons, and instead may negotiate accommodations with customers regarding particular situations.

Our Products

     During 2003, our operations are generally organized in two segments, Consumer Electronics Products, or CEP, and LCD panels and transformers, or LPT. The activities of our LPT segment relate primarily to our J.I.C. subsidiary that we acquired in October 2000. In 2004, our operations were re-organized into three reportable segments consisting of consumer electronics and communication products, or CECP, telecommunication components assembly, or TCA and LCD panels, or LCDP. In 2003, CECP and TCA were classified as a single reportable segment as CEP while LCDP also comprised the transformers operations and collectively referred to as LPT as a result of the disposal of transformer business in 2003.

     The dollar amount (in thousands) and percentage of our net sales by business segment and product category for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 were as follows:

                          
   Year ended December 31,
   
   2001 2002 2003
   
 
 
   Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
   
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer Electronic Products:                        
 Telecom component assembly(1) $121,751   52% $103,625   44% $236,812   58%
 LCD consumer products  73,596   32   94,207   40   124,128   31 
 Software development services  2,701   1   2,923   1   4,041   1 
LCD Panels and Transformers(2)                        
 LCD panels  24,977   11   23,937   10   35,041   9 
 Transformers(3)  10,981   4   11,324   5   6,284   1 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  $234,006   100% $236,016   100% $406,306   100%
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
                         
          Year ended December 31,    
  2002  2003  2004 
  Dollars  Percent  Dollars  Percent  Dollars  Percent 
Consumer Electronics and Communication Products $94,032   40% $128,778   32% $163,584   31%
Telecom, Components Assembly:                        
Telecom, components assembly(1)  103,800   44   232,163   57   316,695   59 
Software development services  2,923   1   4,041   1   4,872   1 
LCD Panels and Transformers                        
LCD panels  23,937   10   35,040   9   48,710   9 
Transformers(2)  11,324   5   6,284   1       
Total $236,016   100% $406,306   100% $533,861   100%


(1) Included in componenttelecom, components assembly are our sales from our manufacture of rechargeable battery packs through a joint venture we had with Toshiba Battery Co., Ltd. We sold our interest in the joint venture to a Toshiba relatedToshiba-related company and ceased manufacturing rechargeable battery packs as of April 30, 2002. Accordingly, revenue from sales of battery packs was not included after that date.
 
(2) LCD panels and components consist of products manufactured and sold by our subsidiaries in the J.I.C. Group. We acquired the J.I.C. Group in 2000 and their sales were consolidated with ours beginning on October 1, 2000.
(3)We sold our transformers operation to a third party in June 2003.

19


Please refer to page F-34Note 19 “Segment Information” of the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and Item 8.8 Financial Information — Export Sales which sets forth the information of net sales to customers by geographic area.

Consumer Electronic and Communication Products, or CECP

     The consumer electronic and communication products we manufacture are primarily finished products and include:

•   A BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory for cellular phones, which we began manufacturing in March 2004.
•   CMOS sensor modules, which we began manufacturing in June 2003, for integration into various image-capturing devices such as digital cameras for cellular phones and home entertainment products.
•   Digital camera accessories for use with cellular phones and home entertainment products.
•   Electronic calculators that include basic function calculators, desktop display style, scientific and advanced graphic calculators.
•   Digital management devices that include PDAs and electronic personal organizers.
•   Linguistic products, including electronic dictionaries, spell checkers and language translators.

Telecommunication Component Assembly, or TCA

          Telecommunications Components Assembly

     We manufacture the following subassembliessub-assemblies and components:

   Color and monochrome LCD modules to display information as part of telecommunication products such as cellular phones and telephone

19


systems, appliances and office automation products, such as copiers and facsimile machines. Our LCD modules could be manufactured for use in most other hand-held consumer electronic devices, such as electronic games and digital cameras.

   RF modules, which we began manufacturing in December 2002, for integration into cellular phones. These modules could be manufactured for use in most other hand-held consumer electronic products, such as PDAs, laptop computers and other products with wireless connectivity.
 
CMOS sensor modules, which we began manufacturing in June 2003, for integration into various image capturing devices such as digital cameras for cellular phones and home entertainment products.
   Cellular phones in SKD form.
 
   FPC subassemblies,sub-assemblies which we began manufacturing in March 2003 for integration into various LCD modules.
 
   Front light panels for handheld video game devices.
 
Front•   Back light panels for handheld video game devices, which we began manufacturing in January 2003.August 2004.
 
   1.9 and 2.4 GHz high frequency cordless telephones, home feature phones, family radio systems and transceivers.

LCD Consumer Products

     The LCD-based consumer electronic products we manufacture are primarily finished products and include:

Digital camera accessories for use with the cellular phones and home entertainment products.
Electronic calculators that include basic function calculators, desktop display style, scientific and advanced graphic calculators.
Digital management devices that include PDAs and electronic personal organizers.
Linguistic products, including electronic dictionaries, spell checkers and language translators.

Software Development Services

20


     We offer our OEM customers software development services principally for the operation of electronic dictionary products many of which are manufactured by us, as well as personal organizers and MP3 devices.for major Japanese customers. In addition, to generating revenue from ourwe focus on research and development services, our software design,for car navigation products which typically occurs at the product design stage, oftenwe aim to results in our providing license and/or manufacturing services to the OEM assembly customers.

LCD Panels, and Transformersor LCDP

     With the acquisition of the J.I.C. Group in October 2000, we began producing LCD panels and transformers.

LCD Panelspanels.

     LCD panels are information display components and are featuredfound in numerous applications in electronics products, includingsuch as watches, clocks, calculators, pocket games, PDAs and cellularmobile and wirelesscordless telephones. Currently,We are a customized LCD panel manufacturer, and we use only a small portion ofdevelop each product from design concept all the LCD panels in our assembly operations. We plan to increase the volume of LCD panels we supply by approximately 50% to our assembly business in 2004.

Transformers

     Transformers are generally used to increase or reduce the voltage of an electric power supply to allow a particular part of electrical equipment to be used. The transformers we produce are used in home appliances, telecommunications equipment, computers and computer peripherals. We sold our transformers operationway to a third party in June 2003.high quality mass producible product.

Our Manufacturing and Assembly Capabilities

     We utilize the following production techniques:

   Chip on Film,or COF, is an assembly method for bonding integrated circuit chips and other components onto a flexible printed circuit. This process allows for greater compression of the size of a product when assembled enabling the production and miniaturization of small form factor devices like cellular phones, PDAs, digital cameras and notebook PCs. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had two14 COF machines. These machines connect the bump of Large Scale Integrated,large scale integrated, or LSI, driver onto FPC pattern with Anisotropic Conductive Film,anisotropic conductive film, or ACF, and mount chip resister cap components to FPC through Surface Mount Technology,surface mount technology, or SMT, is available. These COF machines have the ability to pitch fine to 4038 micrometers and a total production capacity of up to 400,0004,000,000 chips per month.
 
   Chip On Glass,or COG, is a process that connects integrated circuits directly to LCD panels without the need for wire bonding. We apply this technology to produce advanced LCD modules for high-end electronic products, such as cellular phones and PDAs. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had 1321 COG lines.lines in our principal manufacturing facilities. These machines provide an LCD of dimension of up to 200 millimeters (length) x 150 millimeters (width) x 2.8 millimeters2.2 (height), a process time per chip of five seconds, a pin pitch fine to 5038 micrometers and a total production capacity of up to 4,000,000 chips per month. During 2004, our subsidiary, Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., or Jetup, also started manufacturing COG LCD modules. As of December 31, 2004, Jetup had five COG lines and is capable of bonding 1,000,000 pieces of COG LCD modules a month. They are able to bond LCD panels up to sizes of 100 millimeters x 100 millimeters x 2.2 millimeters thick, with an accuracy of five microns’ tolerence, in a cycle time of 12-15 seconds per piece.
 
   Chip On Board,or COB, is a technology that utilizes wire bonding to connect large-scale integrated circuits directly to printed circuit boards. We use COB in the assembly of consumer products such as calculators, personal organizers and linguistic products. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had 4852 COB machines. These machines are fully automatic bonding machines and use ultrasonic mounting technology. The bonding time, pressure, power and each wire loop are under machine programmable control. These machines provide a high speed chip mounting time of per 2 millimeters wire per 0.25 second, a bond pad fine to 75 micrometers and a total production capacity of up to 2,600,0003,000,000 chips per month.
 
   Outer Lead Bonding,or OLB, is an advanced technology used to connect PCBs and large-scale integrated circuits with a large number of connectors. We use this technology to manufacture complex miniaturized products, such as high-memory PDAs. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had three OLB machines. The machines include multi-pinned Tape Carrier Packaged Large Scale Integrated Circuit,tape carrier packaged large scale integrated circuit, or TCP LSIC, bonding which is up to 280 pins, which also provide ultra thin assembly with module thickness to around one millimeter and high accuracy bonding with pin pitch to 100 micrometers. The total production capacity is 12,000 units per month.

21


 
Tape Automated Bonding with Anisotropic Conductive Film,or TAB with ACF, is an advanced heat sealing technology that connects a liquid crystal display component with an integrated circuit in very small LCD modules, such as those used in cellular phones and pagers. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had 2735 systems of TAB with ACF machines. The machines provide process time of 24 to 25 seconds per component, a pin pitch fine to 200 micrometers and a total production capacity of up to 2,360,0003,660,000 components per month. During 2004, Jetup also started manufacturing TAB LCD modules. As of December 31, 2004, Jetup had two TAB lines and is capable of bonding 250,000 pieces of TAB LCD modules a month. They are able to bond LCD panels up to sizes of 120 millimeters x 120 millimeters x 2.2 millimeters thick, with an accuracy of 10 microns’ tolerence in a cycle time of 20-25 seconds per piece.

20


   
Fine Pitch Heat Seal Technology,or FPHS technology, allows us to connect LCD displays to PCBs produced by COB and outer lead bonding that enables very thin connections. This method is highly specialized and is used in the production of finished products such as PDAs. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had eight machines utilizing FPHS technology. The machines provide a pin pitch fine to 260 micrometers and a total production capacity of up to 268,000 units per month.
 
   Surface Mount Technology,or SMT, is a process by which electronic components are mounted directly on both sides of a printed circuit board, increasing board capacity, facilitating product miniaturization and enabling advanced automation of production. We use SMT for products such as electronic linguistic devices. AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had 2129 SMT productions lines. The production time per chip ranges from 0.072 second per chip to 0.8 second per chip and high precision ranging from +/-0.09-0.05 millimeter to +/-0.1 millimeter. The components size ranges from 0.6 millimeter (length) x 0.3 millimeter (width) to 55 millimeters (length) x 55 millimeters (width). Ball Grid Array,grid array, or BGA, ball pitch is 0.5 millimeter and ball diameter is 0.2 millimeter. The total production capacity is 490,445,000670,000,000 resistor capacitor chips per month.
 
   Twisted Nematic LCDs,or TN type LCD, is the most conventional and economical and is suitable for most common LCDs usedlow information content display systems such as those found in devices like calculators, watches, car audio, car clusters and watches. Atother medical instruments. As of December 31, 2003, we2004, J.I.C. had two TN LCD lines. The lines use 360 millimeter by 400 millimeter glass sheets and have acapable of total capacity of about 90,000100,000 pairs of glass sheetspanels (each sheet of glass of 360 millimeters x 400 millimeters size) per month.
 
   Super-Twisted Nematic LCDs,or STN, type LCDs allow for clearer visibility and wider viewing angle than TN-type LCDs. STN LCDscapable of providing higher information content display systems are suitable for usefound in devices likeapplications such as cordless phones, mobile phones, MP3 players, pocket games and PDA personal digital assistants. We began manufacturing thesePDAs. J.I.C. started producing STN LCDs in the second quarter of 2002 and, atas of December 31 2003, we had one STN LCD line. It uses2004, was equiped with a automated line capable of capacity 50,000 pairs of glass (each sheet of glass of 360 millimeter bymillimeters x 400 millimeter glass sheets and has a capacity of about 40,000 to 50,000 glass sheetsmillimeters size) panels per month.

     AtAs of December 31, 2003,2004, we had threefour clean rooms at our principal manufacturing facilities, which housed COF and COG capabilities for LCD module and front light or back light panel manufacturing. We also had threehave five clean rooms at another of our factories, which are used to manufacture LCD panels. Of our sixnine clean rooms atas of December 31, 2003, three2004, six were class ten thousand, and three were class thousand.

Quality Control

     We maintain strict quality control programs for our products, including the use of total quality management, or TQM, systems and advanced testing and calibration equipment. Our quality control personnel test the quality of incoming raw materials and components. During the production stage, our quality control personnel also test the quality of work-in-progress at several points in the production process. Finally, after the assembly stage, we conduct testing of finished products. In addition, we provide office space at our principal manufacturing facilities for representatives of our major customers to permit them to monitor production of their products and we provide them with direct access to our manufacturing personnel.

     All of our manufacturing facilities are certified under ISO 9001 quality standards, the International Organization for Standardization’s, or ISO’s highest standards. The ISO is a Geneva-based organization dedicated to the development of worldwide standards for quality management guidelines and quality assurance. ISO 9000, which was the first quality system standard to gain worldwide recognition, requires a company to gather, analyze, document, monitor and make improvements where needed. Our certification under an ISO 9001 quality standard demonstrates that our manufacturing operations meet the most demanding of the established world standards. Our principal manufacturing facilities are also certified under an ISO 14001 quality standard, which was published in 1996 to provide a structured basis for environmental management control.

     We started the implementation of the Six Sigma approach in 2004 and our principal manufacturing facilities have been recognized by the China Association for Quality of the Chinese Government as a “National Advanced Enterprise for the Promotion of Six Sigma”. Six Sigma is an internationally recognized approach that uses facts and data to develop better solutions, thereby reducing defects and production times, and improving customer satisfaction. This approach allows the Company to lower its costs due to the minimization of manufacturing defects. This results in improved profit margins and higher competitiveness.

Our Suppliers

     We purchase thousands of different component parts from numerous suppliers. We are not dependent upon any single supplier for any key component. We purchase components from suppliers in Japan, China and elsewhere. We generally base component orders on received purchase orders in an effort to minimize our inventory risk by ordering components and products only to the extent necessary although for certain customers we will occasionally purchase raw materials based on such customer’s rolling forecasts.

22


     The major component parts we purchase include the following:

   off-the-shelf and custom integrated circuits or “chips,”“chips”, most of which we purchase presently from Toshiba Corporation, and Sharp Corporation and certain of their affiliates;
 
   LCD panels, which are available from many manufacturers. In 2003,2004, we purchased LCD panels from Epson Hong Kong Ltd., Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd., Optrex Corporation and Sharp Corporation for LCD panels and in the future we may produce some LCD supplies internally;
 
   CMOS sensor,sensors, which we purchase entirelymainly from Omnivision Technologies Inc.;
 
   solar cells and batteries, which are standard “off-the-shelf” items that we generally purchase in Hong Kong from agents of Japanese manufacturers; and
 
   various mechanical components such as plastic parts, rubber keypads, PCBs, indium tin oxide, or ITO, glass used in the production of LCD panels, and packaging materials from various local suppliers in China.

21


     Whenever practical, we use domestic China suppliers who are often able to provide items at low costs and with short lead times.

     Certain components may be subject to limited allocation by certain of our suppliers. During 2000, there was an industry-wide shortage of components in the electronics industry as supply was unable to satisfy growing world demand. In some cases, supply shortages and delays in deliveries of particular components have resulted in curtailed production, or delays in production of assemblies using scarce components. These supply shortages have contributed to an increase in our inventory levels and reduction in our margins. We expect that shortages and delays in deliveries of some components will continue. If we are unable to obtain sufficient components on a timely basis, we may experience manufacturing delays, which could harm our relationships with current or prospective customers and reduce our sales.

     The principal raw materials used by the Company are large scale integrated, circuits or LSI, circuits (CMOS), Semiconductors,semiconductors, LCD panels and batteries. At times, the pricing and availability of these raw materials can be volatile, due to numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions, currency exchange rates, industry cycles, production levels or a supplier’s tight supply. In the past, we have asked our customers to share in the increased costs of raw materials where such increased costs would adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Our customers have generally agreed when so requested in the past. We cannot assure you, however, that our customers will agree to share costs in the future and that our business, results of operations and financial condition would not be adversely affected by increased volatility of raw materials.

Production Scheduling

     The typical cycle for a product to be designed, manufactured and sold to an OEM customer is one to two years, which includes the production period, the development period and the period for market research and data collection (which is undertaken primarily by our OEM customers). Initially an OEM customer gathers data from its sales personnel on products for which there is market interest, including features and unit costs. The OEM customer then contacts us, and possibly other prospective manufacturers, with forecasted total production quantities and design specifications or renderings. From that information, we in turn contact our suppliers and determine estimated component and material costs. We later advise our OEM customer of the development costs, charges (including molds, tooling and software design, if applicable) and unit cost based on the forecasted production quantities desired during the expected production cycle.

     Once we and the OEM customer agree to the quotation for the development costs and the unit cost, we begin the product development if we are engaged to do so. This development period typically lasts less than six months, but may be longer if software design is included. During this time we complete all molds, tooling and software required to manufacture the product with the development costs generally borne by our customer. Upon completion of the molds, tooling and software, we produce samples of the product for the customer’s quality testing, and, once approved, commence mass production of the product. We recover the development costs in relation to molds, tooling and software from our customers.

23


     The production period usually lasts approximately six to twelve months. In some cases, our OEM customer handles all product design and development and engages us only at the point of initial production. Typically, more advanced products have shorter production runs. If total production quantities change, the OEM customer often provides only limited notice before discontinuing orders for a product. At any point in time we aremay be in different stages of the development and production periods for the various models under development or in production for our OEM customers.

     Generally, our production is based on purchase orders received from OEM customers. Purchase orders are often supported by letters of credit or written confirmation from the OEM customer and generally may not be cancelled once confirmed without the mutual consent of the parties. Even in those cases where customers are contractually obligated to purchase products from us or repurchase unused inventory from us, we may elect not to immediately enforce our contractual rights because of the long-term nature of our customer relationships and for other business reasons, and instead may negotiate accommodations with customers regarding particular situations.

     We did not suffer a material loss resulting from the cancellation of OEM customer orders in 2001 to 2003.2004. In 2001, we wrote down our inventory for $3.8 million for slow-moving raw materials relating to cancelled, reduced or delayed orders. However, subsequently we were able to use some of these raw materials in production or we received compensation for the unused raw materials from certain of our customers, and the gain of $2.0 million was recorded in cost of sales during 2002.

Sales and Marketing

     We focus on developing close relationships with our customers at the development and design phases and continuing throughout all stages of production. We identify, develop and market new technologies that benefit our customers and position us well as an EMS provider.

     Sales and marketing operations are integrated processes involving direct salespersons, project managers and senior executives. We direct our sales resources and activities at several management and staff levels within our customers and prospective customers. We receive unsolicited inquiries resulting from word of mouth, from public relations activities, and through referrals from current customers. We evaluate these opportunities against our customer selection criteria and assign direct salespersons.

22


Seasonality

     Historically, our sales and operating results are often affected by seasonality. Sales of calculators, personal organizers and linguistic products are often higher during the second and third quarters in anticipation of the start of the school year and the Christmas buying season. Similarly, our consumer services for electronics products have historically been lower in the first quarter resulting from both the closing of our factories in China for the Chinese New Year holidays and the general reduction in sales following the holiday season. As we have diversified our services for complex components, we expect that seasonality may be less of a factor affecting our business.

Transportation

     Typically, we sell products F.O.B. Hong Kong, which means that our customers are responsible for the transportation of finished products from Hong Kong to their final destination.     Transportation of components and finished products to and from Shenzhen is by truck. Component parts purchased from Japan are generally shipped by air. To date, we have not been materially affected by any transportation problems. However, transportation difficulties affecting air cargo or shipping, such as an extended closure of ports that materially disrupts the flow of our customers’ products into the United States, could materially and adversely affect our sales and margins if, as a result, our customers delay or cancel orders or seek concessions to offset expediting charges they incurred pending resolution of the problems causing the port closures.

Competition

     General competition in the contract EMS industry is intense and characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change and competition from major international companies. This intense competition has resulted in pricing pressures, lower sales and reduced margins. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our targeted markets are product quality, pricing, flexibility and timeliness in responding to design and schedule changes, reliability in meeting product delivery schedules, technological sophistication and geographic location. Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing, manufacturing, regional shipping capabilities and logistics support and personnel resources than we do and we may not be able to continue to compete successfully.

24


     The EMS services we provide are available from many independent sources as well as from current and potential customers with in-house manufacturing capabilities. Our EMS competitors include Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International Ltd., Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation and Solectron Corporation. Our principal competitors in the manufacture of our traditional product lines of calculators, personal organizers and linguistic products include Kinpo Electronics, Inc. and Inventec Co. Ltd. Our principal competitors in the manufacturemanufacturing of image capturing devices and the CMOS sensortheir modules areinclude Lite-On Technology Corporation, The Primax Group and Logitech Inc.International S.A. Our principal competitors in the manufacture of mobile phone accessories include Elcoteq Network Corp. Our competitors in the manufacturing of RF modules include Wavecom and WKK International (Holdings) Ltd. Our competitors in the manufacturing of LCD panels include Truly International Holdings Ltd. and Varitronix International Ltd. We have numerous competitors in the telecommunications, subassembliestelecommunication, sub-assemblies and components product lines, including Philips, Samsung and Varitronix.Varitronix International Ltd. Our competitors in our FPC sub-assemblies business include Solectron Corporation.

Research and Development

     We invest in research and development for manufacturing and assembly technology that provide us with the potential to offer better and more technologically advanced services to our OEM customers or assist us in working with our OEM customers in the design and development of future products. We plan to continue acquiring advanced design equipment and to enhance our technological expertise through continued training of our engineers and further hiring of qualified system engineers. These investments are intended to improve the speed, efficiency and quality of our assembly processes.

     In our ODM business, we are responsible for the design and development of new products, the rights to which we own. We sell these products to OEM customers to be marketed to end users under the customers’ brand names. To date, we have successfully developed a number of electronic dictionaries, cordless telephones and calculator products. Our efforts to expand or maintain the ODM business may not be successful and we may not achieve material revenues or profits from our efforts. To date, our ODM design activities have not been a material portion of our research and development budget.

Patents, Licenses and Trademarks

     We do not have any patents, licenses or trademarks on which our business is substantially dependent. Instead, we rely on our trade secrets, industry expertise and long-term relationships with our customers and suppliers.

Organizational Structure

     We are a holding company for Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited, Nam Tai Group Management Ltd.,Limited, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited, Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) CompanyZastron Precision-Tech Limited, Namtek Software Development Company Limited and J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and their subsidiaries. The chart below illustrates the organizational structure of the Company and our principal operating subsidiaries atas of December 31, 2003.2004.

2523


(ORGANISATION CHART OF NAM TAI GROUP)

(ORGANISATION CHART)

     Our significant operating entities are described below:

J.I.C. Technology Company Limited

     J.I.C. Technology Company Limited was formed in the Cayman Islands in January 2002 in connection with a reverse merger with Albatronics, of which we owned slightly more than 50% of the outstanding capital stock. J.I.C. Technology Company Limited was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in June 2002. We currently hold 74.86% of the ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, and upon full conversion of the preference shares we own, we would own approximately 88.39% of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.

J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Ltd.

     J.I.C. Enterprises, incorporated in Hong Kong, was established in 1983 and has been in the LCD business for almost 20 years. Originally a small trading company for LCD panels and electronics products, J.I.C. Enterprises is now strategically focused on the sales and marketing of LCD panels and is responsible for customer relationship development.

Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

     Jetup Electronic was incorporated in 1993 in China and handles the manufacturing and processing works of LCD panels through its factory plants in Baoan County, Shenzhen.

Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited

     Nam Tai Macao was established in August 2003 in Macao, China as our PRC headquarters, due to our continuous increase in investment in China. Macao, like Hong Kong, is a special region of China and has recently introduced an incentive program to attract investment in Macao. Its principal business is the provision of management and sales co-ordination and marketing services to other group companies.

26


Nam Tai Group Management Limited

     Nam Tai Group Management Limited was established on March 9, 2001 in Hong Kong and provides management services to other group companies.

Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company Limited

     Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company Limited was incorporated in June 2003 in the Cayman Islands, and is the holding company for Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.

Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited

     Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Ltd. was organized as Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Ltd. in March 1992 as a limited liability company pursuant to the relevant laws of China. Zastron engaged in production of metallic parts and PVC plastic products, much of which is used in products manufactured in our principal manufacturing facilities. In August 2002, Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Ltd. changed its name to Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and the nature of business was expanded to include manufacturing of telecommunication products and LCD modules and become one of our principal manufacturing arms. In June 2002, Zastron’s equity interest was transferred from Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) to Nam Tai Group Management Limited. In October 2002, Zastron’s silk screening business was transferred to Jieyao Electronics (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., a former subsidiary of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and was sold in June 2003. In December 2002, the equity interest of Zastron was transferred from Nam Tai Group Management Limited to Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited. In December 2003, the equity interest of Zastron was transferred from Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited to Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company Limited.

Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited

     Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited, or NTEEP, was incorporated in June 2003 in the Cayman Islands, and is the holding company for Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited. Its shares were listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on 28 April 2004 and we hold 75% of the issued ordinary shares of NTEEP.

Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

     Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. was established as Baoan (Nam Tai) Electronic Co. Ltd. in June 1989 as a contractual joint venture company with limited liability pursuant to the relevant laws of China. The equity of Baoan (Nam Tai) Electronic Co. Ltd. was 70% owned 70% by Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and 30% owned by a Chinese company. In 1992, the Chinese company transferred all of its equity interest in the contractual joint venture to Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary of Nam Tai, which name was subsequently changed to Nam Tai Trading Company Limited, and the company changed its name to Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. NamtaiIt is the principal operating arm of NTEEP.

Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited

     Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited was established in August 2003 in Macao, China. In March 2004, the equity interest of Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited was transferred from the Company to NTEEP and became its wholly owned subsidiary. Its principal business is the provision of management and sales co-ordination and marketing services to other companies within the NTEEP group.

24


Zastron Precision-Tech Limited

     Zastron Precision-Tech Limited, or Zastron, was incorporated in June 2003 in the Cayman Islands, and is the holding company for Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Zastron (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited.

Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.

     Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. was organized as Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Ltd. in March 1992 as a limited liability company pursuant to the relevant laws of China. Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Ltd. was engaged in the production of metallic parts and PVC plastic products, much of which is used in the products manufactured in our principal manufacturing facilities. In August 2002, Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Ltd. changed its name to Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and expanded the nature of its business to include manufacturing of telecommunication products, LCD modules, TFT LCD modules and others. It also became one of our principal manufacturing arms. Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. is currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zastron.

Zastron (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited

     Zastron (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited was established in March 2004 in Macao, China and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited. NamtaiZastron. Its principal business is the provision of management, sales co-ordination and marketing services to other companies within the Zastron group.

J.I.C. Technology Company Limited

     J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, or J.I.C., was formed in the Cayman Islands in January 2002 in connection with a reverse merger with Albatronics, of which we owned slightly more than 50% of the outstanding capital stock. J.I.C. was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in June 2002. We currently hold 71.63% of the issued ordinary shares of J.I.C.

Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. is one

     Jetup Electronic was incorporated in 1993 in China and handles the manufacturing and processing works of our principal manufacturing armsLCD panels through its factory plants in Baoan County, Shenzhen.

J.I.C. (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited

     J.I.C. (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited was incorporated in November 2004 in Macao, China and is engaged in researcha wholly-owned subsidiary of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited. Its principal business is the provision of management, sales co-ordination and development, manufacturing and assembling our electronic products in China. In December 2003,marketing services to other companies with the equity interest of Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. was transferred from Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) to Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Cayman Islands).J.I.C. Group.

Namtek Software Development Company Limited

     Namtek Software Development Company Limited was incorporated in May 2002 in the Cayman Islands and was established as the holding company for Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd. and Namtek Japan Company Limited.

Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd.

     Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd. was organized in December 1995 as a limited liability company pursuant to the relevant laws of China. Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd. commenced operations in early 1996 developing and commercializing software for the consumer electronics industry, particularly for our customers and for products we manufacture or we will manufacture in the future. At December 31, 2003,2004, Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd employed approximately 7793 software engineers and provides the facilities and expertise to assist in new product development and research, enabling us to offer our customers program design for microprocessors, enhanced software design and development services, and strengthening our ODM capabilities. In July 2002, Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd set up a branch office in Shanghai for employing more expertise to assist in new product development and research. As of December 31, 2003, Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd’s Shanghai office employed approximately 11 software engineers.

27


Namtek Japan Company Limited

     Namtek Japan Company Limited was incorporated in June 2003 in Tokyo, Japan and is the sales and marketing arm of software business of Namtek Group in Japan.

Property, Plant and Equipment

     Our registered office and principal executive office in the British Virgin Islands is located at McNamara Chambers, P.O. Box 3342, Road Town, Tortola. Our principal

25


executive office in the British Virgin Islands is located at 116 Main Street, 3rd Floor, Road Town, Tortola. Corporate administrative matters are conducted at this office through our registered agent, McNamara Corporate Services Limited. We do not own any property in the British Virgin Islands. The table below lists the locations, square footage, principal use and lease expiration dates of the facilities used in our principal operations.

             
          Owned or lease
Location Square Footage Principal Use expiration date(1)

 
 
 
Hong Kong  24,200  Offices Owned(2)
Macao  1,782  Offices  2005 
British Virgin Islands  300  Offices  2004 
Principal Manufacturing Facilities
  300,800  Manufacturing  2043 
Shenzhen, China  39,380  Offices  2043 
   237,000  Dormitories and cafeteria  2043 
   33,826  Recreational  2043 
Other facilities
            
Shenzhen, China  151,738  Manufacturing LCD panels  2004 
   108,181  Dormitories  2004 
   2,875  Dormitories  2004 
Shekou, Shenzhen, China  6,650  Software development  2004 
Shanghai, China  4,754  Software development  2005 
Tokyo, Japan  904  Software development  2005 
         
        Owned or lease
Location Square Footage  Principal Use expiration date(1)
Hong Kong  24,200  Offices Owned(2)
Macao  1,875  Offices 2005
Macao (for J.I.C. Macao)  964  Offices 2006
British Virgin Islands  300  Offices 2005
Principal Manufacturing Facilities
  557,835  Manufacturing 2043/2049 (3)
Shenzhen, China  87,462  Offices 2043/2049 (3)
   189,952  Dormitories 2043/2049 (3)
   26,939  Cafeteria 2043
   33,826  Recreational 2049
Other facilities
        
Other facilities Shenzhen, China
  383,547  Manufacturing LCD panels 2012
   32,005  Offices 2012
   221,666  Dormitories 2012
   22,259  Cafeteria 2012
   14,548  Recreational 2012
 
Shekou, Shenzhen, China  12,374  Software development 2005
Tokyo, Japan  904  Software development 2005


(1) Only the Chinese government and peasant collectives may own land in China. Our principal manufacturing facilities are located on land in which we have entered into a land lease agreement with the Chinese government that gives us the right to use the land for 50 years. Based on our understanding of the practice as it exists today, at the expiration of the land lease we may be given the right to renew the lease. However, at the end of the lease term, all improvements we have made will revert to the government. For our other facilities, we have entered into factory building lease agreements with peasant collectives or other companies for 10 years or less.
 
(2) Although we own the office space, the land on which the building is located is subject to a 75-year lease with the government that expires in 2055, with a right to renew for 75 more years.
(3)Our principal manufacturing facilites occupy two pieces of land with 50-year leases which we acquired in 1993 and 1999, respectively.

     In order to expand our production capacity, we are buildinghave built a new factory consisting of approximately 250,000265,000 square feet on portions of the vacant land adjacent to our existing factory complexprincipal manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen, China. Construction beganThe construction completed in September 2003 andDecember 2004. We expect full operations can commence in April 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we expect it to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter in 2004. After completion, the production capacity is expected to increase from 40% to 60%. We have budgeted $40.0had spent $15.0 million to cover the cost of construction and fixtures and equipment for the new factory. AsThe financing of December 31, 2003, the construction project has already incurred $1.2 million. We currently plan to finance these improvements to our manufacturing facilities were obtained from cashinternal resources.

     In October 2004, our existing production facility for the LCD panels segment also relocated to new factory premises which are approximately 670,000 square feet and twice the size of the former factory premises. This new factory provides room for future expansion of production capacity. As of December 31, 2004, we had spent $7.7 million for this relocation and financed this amount with a combination of internal resources and banking facilities.bank financing.

Hong Kong

     In 2001, our Hong Kong offices relocated to 15/F, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre, 168-200 Connaught Road, Central, Hong Kong. The office is conveniently located above the ferry terminal and beside the highway, permitting easy transportation by sea or by land to and from the manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen. The purchase and renovation of the 24,200 square feet of contiguous prime office space, including transaction fees, cost $13.0 million.

28


     As of December 31, 2003,2004, we own fourone residential flatsflat in Hong Kong purchased for total consideration of $5,999,000. These properties are$1,108,000. This property is occupied by one member of senior management and formforms a part of theirhis compensation.

     Until 1996, we owned approximately ten acres of land in Hong Kong carried on our books at a cost of approximately $523,000. Between 1997 and 20032004, we sold approximately 7.7 acres of land for net proceeds of $7,281,000,$7.28 million; realizing a gain of $7,027,000.$7.03 million. We plan to sell the remaining land and, pending the sale, to continue to carry the land at a cost of approximately $134,000.

26


Macao

     In August 2003, we set upestablished our PRC headquarters in Macao, China due to our continuous increaseand set up Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited in investment inMacao, China. Macao, like Hong Kong, is a special administrative region of China and has recently introduced an incentive program to attract investmentinvestments to Macao. In March and November 2004, we further established Zastron (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited and J.I.C.(Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited in Macao.Macao, China, respectively. We currently lease three offices and all of them under two-year leases expiring in July 2005 and December 2006, respectively. The monthly rental cost is approximately $905 per office.

Shenzhen, China

Principal Manufacturing Facilities

     Our principal manufacturing facilities are located in Baoan County, Shenzhen, China. TheIn December 1993, we acquired a 50-year lease for thisthe first piece of land was purchased for approximately $2.45 million in December 1993 and has a term of 50 years. Thismillion. The first phase facility consistsconsisted of 160,000 square feet of manufacturing space, 39,000 square feet of offices, 212,000 square feet of new dormitories, 26,000 square feet of full service cafeteria, and recreation facilities and a swimming pool. The total cost of this addition to our complex, excluding land, was approximately $21.8 million. In November 2000, we began construction of another addition to our factory complex. We completed construction in October 2002, adding a new five-story factory with 138,000 square feet of production facilities, including one floor for assembling, one floor of office space, one floor for warehouse use and two floors of class thousand clean room facilities. Prior to this addition, we had only one floor of class ten thousand clean room facilities at our factory complex. As of December 31, 2002, we had spent $9.1 million to complete the construction of the new facility. With thethis new addition, we had approximately 626,000 square feet of manufacturing space at our principal manufacturing complexfacilities as of December 31, 2002, with only minimal additions in 2003.

     In July 1999, we purchased aanother vacant lot of approximately 280,000 square feet (approximately 6.5 acres) bordering our current manufacturing complex located in Shenzhen, China at a cost of approximately $1.2 million. We are buildinghave built another factory consisting of approximately 250,000265,000 square feet.feet of space. Construction has beganstarted in September 2003 and we expect it to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter in December 2004. We have budgeted $40.0expect full operation can commence in April 2005. With this new addition, our principal manufacturing facilities now consists of 557,835 square feet of manufacturing space, 87,462 square feet of offices, 189,952 square feet of dormitories and 60,765 square feet of cafeteria space and a full services recreational building. As of December 31, 2004, we had spent $15.0 million to cover the cost of construction and fixtures and equipment for the new factory, of which $1.2 million has already been spent in 2003. We currently plan to financefactory. The financing for these improvements to our manufacturing facilities was obtained from cash resources and banking facilities.internal resources.

LCD Factory

     Our LCD factory was leased since 1997 and has about 151,738 square feet of manufacturing space. The facility produces LCD panels to the specifications of our OEM customers and has an average monthly output of 12 to 14 million pieces. The lease of the facility will expire on August 31, 2004.     In October 2003, Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. entered into a tenancy agreement for new factory premises, and plans to replace its existing factory premises in order to expand its manufacturing facilities to cope with future development. Alsowhich is also located in Baoan County, Shenzhen, China, the new factory premises, including dormitories, are about 600,000 square feet which are two times the size of the existing factory premises. Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. plansand relocated to move into the new factory premises in the third quarter ofOctober 2004. The existingnew factory premises will then be returned toare about twice the landlord.size of the former factory premises and consist of 383,547 square feet of manufacturing space, 32,005 square feet of offices, 221,666 square feet of dormitories, and 36,807 square feets of cafeteria and recreational spaces. This new factory provides room for the future expansion of production capacity. As of December 31, 2004, we had spent $7.7 million for this relocation and financed this amount with a combination of internal resources and bank financing.

Software Development

     We currently lease threetwo offices in which we conduct software development. Our Shekou, Shenzhen, China office hasis approximately 8,93112,374 square feet, which we lease under two one-year leases expiring in August and September 2004, respectively. The monthly rental is approximately $6,017. Our Shanghai, China office, has approximately 4,754 square feet, which we lease under a three-year lease expiring in July 2005. The monthly rental is approximately $4,033.$7,667. In July 2003, we opened an office in Tokyo, Japan to further expand our sales and marketing team in Japan for our software development business. The Tokyo office has approximately 904 square feet, which we lease under a two-year lease expiring in June 2005. The monthly rental for the Tokyo office is approximately $1,900.

29


$1,975.See Item 3. Key Information — “Risk Factors.” — “Risks Related to Our Operations in China, Hong Kong, Macao and Japan.”

Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

     Except for statements of historical facts, this section contains forward-looking statements involving risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words including “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intends,” “should,”“expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate”, “intends”, “should”, or “may.”“may”. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance or results and our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the section of this Report entitled Item 3. Key Information — “Risk Factors.” This section should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements included as Item 18 of this Report.

27


Operating Results

Overview

     We are an electronics manufacturing and design services provider to a select group of the world’s leading OEMs of telecommunications and consumer electronic products. Through our EMSelectronics manufacturing services operations, we manufacture electronic components and subassemblies,sub-assemblies, including LCD panels, LCD modules, RF modules, FPC subassembliessub-assemblies and image sensors.sensors modules. These components are used in numerous electronic products, including cellular phones, laptop computers, digital cameras, copiers, fax machines, electronic toys, handheld video game devices and microwave ovens. We also manufacture finished products, including cellular phones, palm-sized PCs, PDAs, electronic dictionaries, calculators, and digital camera accessories and BluetoothTM wireless headset accessory for use with cellular phones.

     We assist our OEM customers in the design and development of their products and furnish full turnkey manufacturing services that utilize advanced manufacturing processes and production technologies. Our services include hardware and software design, component purchasing, assembly into finished products, or electronic subassembliessub-assemblies and post-assembly testing. These services are value-added and assist us in obtaining new business but do not represent a material component of our revenue. We also provide ODM services, in which we design and develop proprietary products that are sold by our OEM customers using their brand name.

Net Sales and Cost of Sales

     We derive our net sales principally from manufacturing services that we provide to OEMs of telecommunications and consumer electronic products. The market for the products we manufacture is generally characterized by declining unit prices and short product life cycles. Sales to our OEM customers are primarily based on purchase orders we receive from time to time rather than firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers. We recognize sales, net of product returns and warranty costs, typically at the time of product shipment or, in some cases, as services are rendered.

     A substantial percentage of our net sales are to a small number of customers. During the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, sales to our ten largest customers were 83.7%, 84.8% and 84.9% of our net sales, respectively. Furthermore, our customers accounting for 10% or more of our net sales aggregated approximately 44.1%, 60.2% and 46.7% of our total sales, respectively, for the same three-year period. The loss of any of our largest customers or a substantial reduction in orders from any of them would materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

     We plan to continue to leverage on our solid customer relationships and to expand our business. During 2003, we were able to expand our product line to higher margin products and we were able to benefit from the increase in production capacity from the commencement of operation of our new factory premises.

     For LCD Consumer Products, we will continue to focus on educational products, cellular phone accessories and home entertainment products. In 2004, we will begin delivery of new products, like bluetooth headsets for cellular phones and new home entertainment products, in addition to the Eyetoy USB Cameras for Playstation 2.

     For Telecom Component Assembly, we will continue to focus on high end color LCD modules and CMOS sensor modules. We shall seek opportunities to expand our product line and customer base for these products.

     We plan to relocate our existing production facility for the LPT segment to new factory premises. It is expected that the relocation to the new factory premises will be completed in the third quarter of 2004. The new premises, which are about 600,000 square feet, are two times the size of the existing factory premises. This new factory will provide room for future expansion of production capacity. We intend to spend approximately $6.5 million for this relocation and finance this amount with a combination of internal resources and bank financing.

     Our production is typically based on purchase orders received from OEM customers. However, for certain customers, we will occasionally purchase raw materials based on such customers’ rolling forecasts. Purchase orders are often supported by letters of credit or written confirmation from our OEM customers. We generally do not obtain firm, long-term commitments from our customers. Uncertain economic conditions and our general lack of long-term purchase commitments with our customers make it difficult for us to accurately predict our revenue over the longer term. Even in those cases where customers are contractually obligated to purchase products from us or to repurchase unused inventory from us, we may elect not to immediately enforce our contractual rights because of the long-term nature of our customer relationships and for other business reasons, and instead may negotiate accommodations with customers regarding particular situations.

     We did not suffer a material loss resulting from the cancellation of OEM customer orders in 2001 to 2003. In 2001 however, we wrote down our inventory for $3.8 million to cost of sales for slow-moving raw materials relating to cancelled, reduced or delayed orders. Subsequently, we were able to use some of these raw materials in production or we received compensation for the unused raw materials from certain of our customers, and the gain of $2.0 million was recorded in cost of sales during 2002.

30


Gross Margins

     Our gross margins and operating income generally improve during periods of high-volume and high-capacity utilization in our manufacturing facilities and decline during periods of low-volume and low-capacity utilization. Over the last several years our gross profit margins have declined substantially, from 17.2% in 1999 to 14.8% in 2000 and 12.8% in 2001 before increasing to 16.1% in 2002 and 16.3% in 2003. The $3.8 million inventory write-down in 2001 has reduced the gross margin by 1.7% in 2001 and our subsequent gain of $2.0 million recorded in cost of sales during 2002, as discussed above, increased our gross margin by 0.8% for 2002.

     An increased mix of more complexComplex products that generally have relatively high material costs as a percentage of total unit costs and accordingly our strategic shift to produce more of such products has historically been a factor that has adversely affected our gross margins. This is the primary reason for the decline in our gross margins between 1999 and 2001. During this period, we diversified our product mix from predominantly low complexity electronic products, including calculators and electronic dictionaries, to include more complex components and subassemblies,sub-assemblies, like LCD modules and RF modules. We believe our gross margin improved in 2002 and 2003 as a result of the experience we acquired in manufacturing these more complex products as we changed our strategic focus. Despite the lower gross margin on more complex products, we believe that the opportunity for growth in the demand for these complex products justifies the shift in our strategic focus. Furthermore, we believe that the experience in manufacturing processes and know-how that we have developed from producing more complex products are a competitive advantage for us relative to many of our competitors.

     The increased costs associated with developing advanced manufacturing techniques to produce complex products on a mass scale and at a low cost have also negatively impacted our gross margins. For example, in our initial production runs of LCD modules and RF modules, we experienced low production yields and other inefficiencies that caused our gross margin to decrease. Although we believe we have improved the efficiency and quality of our manufacturing processes relating to LCD modules and RF modules, we may not be able to improve or maintain our gross margin for these products. Furthermore, in January 2003, we began to produce color and TFT LCD modules, each a complex component used in a variety of devices. The increased costs associated with manufacturing these products and other new complex products could have a negative impact on our future gross margins. The complex manufacturing processes involved in the production of complex products is also capital intensive, thereby increasing our fixed overhead costs. It has been our strategy to shift our focus more to the business of key components sub-assembly. The key components sub-assembly business generally accounts for relatively lower gross profit margin business. Nam Tai has been very successful in shifting its focus to key components sub-assembly, which accounted for 59% of our sales in 2004. We believe that the strong growth of this business will offset the impact of lower gross profit margins and we can continue to achieve strong growth in our overall profits. In the long run, we expect to achieve an overall gross profit margins of around 12%.

28


Income Taxes

     Under current BVI law, our income is not subject to taxation. Subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong and the PRCChina are subject to income taxes as described below, and our subsidiary operating in Macao is exempted from income taxes. This would be valid unless the Macao government changes its policy towards offshore companies.

     Under current Cayman Islands law, Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company Limited, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited, Zastron Precision-Tech Limited, J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and Namtek Software Development Company Limited are not subject to profit tax in the Cayman Islands as they have no business operations.

31


operations in the Cayman Islands. However, they may be subject to Hong Kong income taxes as described below if they are registered in Hong Kong.

     The provision for current income taxes of the subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong has been calculated by applying the current rate of taxation of 16% for 2001 and 2002 and 17.5% for both 2003 and 2004 to the estimated taxable income earned in or derived from Hong Kong during the applicable period.

     The basic corporate tax rate for Foreign Investment Enterprises in China, such as our ChinaChinese subsidiaries, is currently 33% (30% state tax and 3% local tax). However, because all of our ChinaChinese subsidiaries are located in Shenzhen and are involved in production operations, they qualify for a special reduced state tax rate of 15%. In addition, the local tax authorities in the regions in which our subsidiaries operate in Shenzhen are not currently assessingassessed any local tax.tax, though that could change at any time. Moreover, several of our ChinaChinese subsidiaries are entitled to certain tax benefits and certain of our ChinaChinese subsidiaries have qualified for tax refunds as a result of reinvesting their profits earned in previous years in China for a minimum period of five years.China.

     Efforts by the Chinese government to increase tax revenues could result in decisions or interpretations of the tax laws by the Chinese tax authorities that are unfavorable to us and which increase our future tax liabilities, or deny us expected refunds. Changes in Chinese tax laws or their interpretation or application may subject us to additional Chinese taxation in the future.

     Our effective tax rates were 2%8%, 4%1% and 1% for 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, respectively. The significant factors that causecaused our effective tax rates to differ from the applicable statutory rates of 15% were as follows:

             
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
Applicable statutory tax rates  15%  15%  15%
Effect of (income) loss for which no income tax benefit/expense is receivable/payable  0%  (4%)  (2%)
Tax holidays and incentives  (8%)  (3%)  (5%)
Effect of PRC tax concessions, giving rise to no PRC tax liability  (6%)  (10%)  (8%)
Others  1%  6%  1%
   
   
   
 
Effective tax rates  2%  4%  1%
   
   
   
 
             
  2002 2003 2004
Applicable statutory tax rates  15%  15%  15%
Effect of loss / income for which no income tax benefit/expense is receivable/payable  6%  (2%)  (10%)
Tax losses not recognised        1%
Tax holidays and incentives  (5%)  (5%)  (3%)
Effect of China tax concessions, giving rise to no China tax liability  (21%)  (8%)  (3%)
Under / (over) provision of income tax expense in prior years  5%      
Other items which are not assessable (deductible) for tax purposes  8%  1%  1%
Effective tax rates  8%  1%  1%

Strategic Investments

     An important element of our strategy is to make investments in companies that provide the potential to complement our existing products and services, become new customers, augment our market coverage and sales ability, enhance our technological capabilities and expand our service offerings. We account for investments of less than 20% under the cost method and we account for investments between 20% and 50% under the equity method. Our material investments over the last five years include:

     Stepmind. In December 2003, we placed approximately $5.3 million into an escrow account for an investment in Stepmind. The investment will bewas to occur in two phases. For the first phase, approximately $2.64 million, representing 7.66% of the equity interest in Stepmind, was released to Stepmind in January 2004. The second phase amounting to $2.65 million will bewas released to Stepmind in August 2004 subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. Upon successful subscriptionIn August 2004, we disposed of our entire interest in Stepmind to one of the shares inshareholders of Stepmind at the second phase, our total investment will represent 11.33% of the equity interest in Stepmind. Stepmind was founded in July 2000 and is a fabless solutions and components supplier, developing applications which require high performance and secured data links.original subscription price for those shares.

29


     Alpha Star/JCT Wireless.JCT.In January 2003, we invested $10.0 million for a 25% equity interest in Alpha Star Investments Ltd., the ultimate holding company of JCT. JCT is engaged in the design, development and marketing of wireless communication terminals and wireless application software and is using us to manufacture wireless communication terminals and their related modules. In September 2004, we made an impairment to write down our $10.0 million investment in Alpha Star to a fair value of approximately $3.0 million. As of December 31, 2004, another analysis had been conducted by an independent valuer, who determined that no further impairment to value was required.

     TCL Group.Over the period from September 2000 through November 2002, we made three investments in the TCL Group of companies and disposed of some portionsa portion of the investment in 2002 and 2003, respectively.2003. In 2004, we further increased our investment in TCL Mobile from holding approximately 3% to 9% through the acquisition of Jasper Ace. The TCL Groupgroup of companies is a leading OEM for numerous consumer electronic and telecommunications products in the domestic Chinese market.

In September 2000, we made a strategic investment of $2.0 million to acquire a 5% indirect equity interest (through a 25% direct equity interest in Mate Fair) in both TCL Mobile Communication (HK) Co., Ltd. and Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., together known as TCL Mobile. TCL Mobile is engaged in manufacturing, distributing and trading of digital mobile phones and accessories in China and overseas markets. In October 2002, we began to provide TCL Mobile with LCD modules used in its mobile phones.

32


   In September 2000, we made a strategic investment of $2.0 million to acquire a 5% indirect equity interest (through a 25% direct equity interest in Mate Fair) in both TCL Mobile Communication (HK) Co., Ltd. and Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., together known as TCL Mobile. TCL Mobile is engaged in manufacturing, distributing and trading of digital mobile phones and accessories in China and overseas markets. In October 2002, we began to provide TCL Mobile with LCD modules used in its mobile phones.

   In January 2002, we acquired a 6% equity interest in TCL Corporation (formerly known as TCL Holdings Corporation Ltd.), the parent of the TCL Group of companies, for approximately $12.0 million.

   In November 2002, Mate Fair sold a portion of its equity interest in Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd. for which we received proceeds of approximately $10.4 million, reducing our direct equity interest (held through Mate Fair) in TCL Mobile to approximately 3%.

   In November 2002, we invested $5.1 million in the 3% convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Limited that are due in November 2005. TCL International Holdings Limited is another company in the TCL Group and is publicly listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Those convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Limited were disposed of in August 2003 for approximately $5.03 million.

•   In April 2004, we increased our shareholding in TCL Mobile from approximately 3% to 9% through acquiring Jasper Ace, which directly holds 9% equity interest in TCL Mobile, at a consideration of approximately $102.2 million. The consideration was satisfied, by the exchange of our 72.2% equity interest in Mate Fair, plus cash of $25 million and the issuance of 1,416,764 new Nam Tai shares and resulted in a net investment cost of $79.5 million.

     Deswell Industries.In September 2000, we purchased 500,000 common shares in Deswell Industries Inc., a Nasdaq-listed company, representing approximately 9% of the outstanding shares of Deswell at the time of the purchase for an aggregate of $7.5 million. Deswell is a manufacturer of injection-molded plastic parts and components, electronic products and subassembliessub-assemblies and metallic molds and accessory parts for OEMs and contract manufacturers. During the first quarter of 2002, we sold our Deswell shares in the open market for aggregate proceeds of $10.1 million.

     The following details the impact of our strategic investments on our income statements for each of the years ended 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003:

             
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
      (in thousands)    
Cost Investments
            
Included in other income:
            
Deswell                      Realized gain on disposal of marketable securities $  $642  $ 
Deswell                      Unrealized gain on marketable securities  1,568       
Deswell                      Dividend income received from marketable securities  525   114    
TCL Corporation       Dividend income received from investment     803   1,696 
Huizhou TCL             Dividend income received from investment        2,018 
   
   
   
 
  $2,093  $1,559  $3,714 
   
   
   
 
Equity Investments
            
Included in equity in (loss) income of affiliated companies:
            
Mate Fair            
    Share of results $2,020  $10,741  $ 
    Amortization of goodwill  (153)      
   
   
   
 
  $1,867  $10,741  $ 
   
   
   
 
Alpha Star Investments Limited            
    Share of results $  $  $498 
   
   
   
 
Equity in (loss) income of affiliated companies $1,867  $10,741  $498 
   
   
   
 
Included in other income:
            
Mate Fair                 Release of unamortized goodwill of affiliated companies $  $(520) $ 
   
   
   
 
  $1,867  $10,221  $498 
   
   
   
 
2004:
               
    2002  2003  2004
    (in thousands)
Cost Investments            
Included in other income:            
Deswell Realized gain on disposal of marketable securities $642  $  $ 
Deswell Dividend income received from marketable securities  114       
TCL Corporation Dividend income received from investment  803   1,696   926 
Huizhou TCL Dividend income received from investment     2,018   17,369 
              
  $1,559  $3,714  $18,295 
              
Equity Investments
Included in equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies:            
Mate Fair   $10,741  $  $ 
Alpha Star Investments Limited $  $498  $(6,806)
              
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies $10,741  $498  $(6,806)
Included in other income:            
Mate Fair Release of unamortized goodwill of affiliated companies $(520) $  $ 
              
   $10,221  $498  $(6,806)
              

30


Toshiba Joint Venture

     In March 2000, we formed a joint venture with Toshiba Battery Company Ltd. called BPC (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., or BPC, to manufacture rechargeable lithium ion battery packs at our manufacturing complex in Shenzhen, China. Toshiba Battery Company Ltd. owned a 13% interest in BPC and we owned the balance of BPC for a cash investment of $1.3 million. During 2000 and 2001 and from January 1 to April 30, 2002, we recognized net sales of $6.2 million, $21.1 million, and $7.8 million, respectively, from Toshiba and its related companies. In 2002, we sold our 87% joint venture interest in BPC and a related manufacturing license to a Toshiba relatedToshiba-related company for an aggregate of $2.9 million, resulting in a gain of $77,000.

33


     Based on the 2001 full year results of BPC, we estimate that the sale of BPC will result in a reduction of annual revenues for 2002 of approximately $21.1 million and a reduction in profits of $1.3 million.million for 2002. We further estimate that the BPC sale will result in a reduction of annual operating expenses of approximately $600,000. Future cash$600,000 for 2002. Cash flows from operations willfor 2002 would decline by approximately $1.7 million a year.million.

J.I.C. Group

     We acquired the J.I.C. Group in October 2000 for $32.8 million. We paid a portion of the purchase price to the seller by issuing approximately 3.48 million of our common shares and paid $11.0 million in cash. The J.I.C. Group is principally engaged in the manufacture and marketing of transformers and LCD panels, a key component for a variety of consumer electronic products. We accounted for the acquisition of the J.I.C. Group under the purchase method of accounting and the results of the J.I.C. Group’s operations have been consolidated with our results since the date of its acquisition.

     In June 2002, through a reverse merger, we arranged for the listing of the J.I.C. Group on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. To effect the listing, we entered into an agreement with the liquidators of Albatronics to effect the restructuring proposal of Albatronics and the listing of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited as this arrangement was more cost effective than using an initial public offering.

     Due to the reverse merger, our effective interest in the J.I.C. Group was reduced from 100% to 92.9%. As a result of this reduction in interest during 2002, we hashave released unamortized goodwill of $1.5 million, representing 7.1% of the goodwill that had previously been recorded upon purchasing the J.I.C. Group in October 2000. The release of unamortized goodwill is included as part of the loss on the reverse merger of the J.I.C. Group.

     In August 2002, we acquired an additional 7,984,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for a cash consideration of $437,000, resulting in additional goodwill of $253,000. As of December 31, 2002, we held 93.97% of effective interest in J.I.C. Group, which represented 74.78% of the existing ordinary shares and 93.97% of the outstanding ordinary shares upon full conversion of the 598,420,000 preference shares.

     During the period from June to November 2003, we disposed of a total of 42,600,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for cash consideration of $4.0 million. The disposal resulted in a net gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary of $1.8 million and the releasing of unamortized goodwill of $1.2 million. The release of unamortized goodwill is netted off with the gain on the partial disposal of a subsidiary. In November 2003, we converted 175,100,000 preference shares into 170,000,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited. As of December 31, 2003, we held 263,900,688 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, equivalent to 74.86% of issued ordinary shares, and 423,320,000 preference shares. Upon full conversion of preference shares owned, we will hold approximately 88.39% of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.

     In June 2003, in order to concentrate its effort on its LCD panels reporting unit, J.I.C. Technology Company Limited disposed of its transformers reporting unit to a third party for a cash consideration of $2.4 million. Sales of the transformers reporting unit for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 were $11.0 million, $11.3 million and $6.3 million, respectively, and were insignificant compared to the sales as a whole. The net income from this discontinued operation for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 were also immaterial. In 2003, the net income from discontinued operation represented the gain of $2.0 million, being the proceeds from the disposal less the carrying value of the net assets of the transformers reporting unit, and minority interests. Excluding this gain, the basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2003 would have been $1.04 and $1.02, respectively.

Operating Segments

     Our operations are generally organized in two segments, Consumer Electronics Products, or CEP, and LCD panels and transformers, or LPT. The activities     During the period from November to December 2004, we further disposed of our LPT segment relate primarily to oura total of 128,000,000 ordinary shares of J.I.C. subsidiary that we acquired in October 2000.

Consumer Electronics Products.Our CEP segment is primarily engaged in the manufacture and assembly of electronic components, subassemblies and finished products for OEMs of electronic and telecommunications products. The electronic components and subassemblies that our CEP segment produces are primarily LCD modules used in a wide variety of consumer electronic products including cellular phones, PDAs digital cameras, handheld video game devices and microwave ovens. In December 2002, our CEP segment also began producing RF modules, used in cellular phones and other electronic devices with wireless features. In September 2003, our CEP segment further started manufacturing of cellular phones in SKD form. The finished products that our CEP segment assembles include digital camera accessories for cellular phones and home entertainment products, like Playstation 2, handheld electronic calculators, dictionaries and linguistic products. Within our CEP segment, we also provide software development services to our OEM customers.

34


LCD Panels and Transformers.Our LPT segment manufactures LCD panels for use in numerous electronic products, including watches, clocks, calculators, pocket games, PDAs and cellular and wireless telephones. The transformers produced by our LPT segment are used in home appliances, telecommunications equipment, computers and computer peripherals. We sold our transformer operations in June 2003Technology Company Limited for cash consideration of $2.4$12.95 million. The disposal resulted in a net gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary of $6.25 million. During the same period, we converted all 423,320,000 preference shares into 410,990,290 ordinary shares. As of December 31, 2004, we held 546,890,978 ordinary shares of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, equivalent to 71.63% of issued ordinary shares.

31


Summary of Results

     Net sales for 2004 increased 31% to $533.8 million compared to $406.3 million for 2003. The increase in sales was primarily due to an increase in the sales in telecom components sub-assemblies and realized a gain of $2.0 million,optical devices. The increase in our net of $0.1 million shared by minority interest.

Seasonalitysales base year-over-year represents stronger demand from existing customers, as well as organic growth from new and existing customers.

     Historically, our sales andThe following table sets forth key operating results are often affected by seasonality. Sales of calculators, personal organizers and linguistic products are often higher during the second and third quarters in anticipation of the start of the school year and the Christmas buying season. Similarly, our consumer services for electronics products have historically been lower in the first quarter resulting from both the closing of our factories in China(in thousands, except per share data) for the Chinese New Year holidaysyears ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004:

             
  Year Ended December 31, 
    
  2002  2003  2004 
Net sales $236,016  $406,306  $533,861 
Gross profit  38,060   66,290   76,476 
Operating income  17,052   37,387   43,378 
Net income  20,023   43,802   66,885 
Basic earnings per share  0.57   1.09   1.57 
Diluted earnings per share  0.57   1.07   1.57 

Key Performance Indicators

     The following table sets forth, for the general reduction in sales followingquarterly periods indicated, certain of management’s key financial performance indicators that management utilizes to assess the holiday season. As we have diversified our services for complex components, we expect that seasonality may be less of a factor affecting our business.Company’s operating results:

                 
  Three Months Ended 
  December 31,  September 30,  June 30  March 31, 
  2003  2003  2003  2003 
Sales cycle (1) 27 days 23 days 27 days 32 days
Inventory turns (2) 13 turns 17 turns 16 turns 9 turns
Days in accounts receivable (3) 58 days 61 days 60 days 61 days
Days in accounts payable (4) 60 days 60 days 55 days 69 days
                 
  Three Months Ended 
  December 31,  September 30,  June 30  March 31, 
  2004  2004  2004  2004 
Sales cycle (1) 9 days 29 days 41 days 29 days
Inventory turns (2) 20 turns 15 turns 11 turns 10 turns
Days in accounts receivable (3) 62 days 54 days 86 days 56 days
Days in accounts payable (4) 72 days 49 days 79 days 64 days

Application


(1)  The sales cycle is calculated as the sum of days in accounts receivable and days in inventory, less the days in accounts payable.

(2)  Inventory turns are calculated as the ratio of four times our year to date cost of sales divided by inventory, net, at period end divided by numbers of quarters.

(3)  Days in accounts receivable is calculated as the ratio of accounts receivable, net, at period end divided by year to date average daily net sales.

(4)  Days in accounts payable is calculated as the ratio of accounts payable, net, at period end divided by year to date average daily net cost of sales.

32


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other factors and circumstances. Management believes that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances; however, actual results may vary from these estimates and assumptions under different future circumstances. We have identified the following critical accounting policies that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. For further discussion of our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2 — “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Marketable securities

     Marketable securities at December 31, 2004 are principally equity securities and are classified as available-for-sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Fair value is determined by reference to market price or analysis conducted by independent valuer. In the event where the fair value of the securities has been below the carrying value for a period of time, we will assess whether this decline in value is other-than-temporary.

     Our assessment includes the consideration of the duration and severity of the decline in values and our ability and intent to hold the investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of the fair value up to or beyond the cost of the investment, and an assessment of the evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time which outweighs the evidence to the contrary. If it is determined that the decline is other-than-temporary, an impairment charge to the income statement will be made.

Valuation of long-lived assets, including goodwill and purchased intangible assets

     The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets, including goodwill and purchased intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, other than goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, by first grouping its long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities (the asset group) and, secondly, estimating the undiscounted future cash flows that are directly associated with and expected to arise from the use of and eventual disposition of such asset group. The Company estimates the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining useful life of the primary asset within the asset group. If the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge to the extent the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company determines fair value through quoted market prices in active markets or, if quoted market prices are unavailable, through the performance of internal analysis of discounted cash flows or external appraisals. The undiscounted and discounted cash flow analyses are based on a number of estimates and assumptions, including the expected period over which the asset will be utilized, projected future operating results of the asset group, discount rate and long-term growth rate.

     To assess goodwill for impairment, the Company performs an assessment of the carrying value of its reporting units at least on an annual basis or when events and changes in circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company’s reporting units below their carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company would perform the second step in its assessment process and would record an impairment charge to earnings to the extent the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units through internal analysis and external valuations, which utilize income and market valuation approaches through the application of capitalized earnings, discounted cash flow and market comparable methods. These valuation techniques are based on a number of estimates and assumptions, including the projected future operating results of the reporting unit, discount rate, long-term growth rate and appropriate market comparables.

33


     The Company’s assessments of impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and purchased intangible assets, and its periodic review of the remaining useful lives of its long-lived assets are an integral part of the Company’s ongoing strategic review of its business and operations. Therefore, future changes in the Company’s strategy and other changes in the operations of the Company could impact the projected future operating results that are inherent in the Company’s estimates of fair value, resulting in impairments in the future. Additionally, other changes in the estimates and assumptions, including the discount rate and expected long-term growth rate, which drive the valuation techniques employed to estimate the fair value of long-lived assets and goodwill could change and, therefore, impact the assessments of impairment in the future.

     In performing the annual assessment of goodwill for impairment, the Company determined that none of the reporting units’ carrying values were close to exceeding their respective fair values.

Revenue Recognitionrecognition

     We recognize     The Company recognizes revenue from product sales in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101“Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”. SAB No. 101 requires that revenue be recognized when all of the following conditions are met:

 persuasivePersuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,exists;
 
 deliveryDelivery has occurred or services have been rendered,rendered;
 
 pricePrice to the customer is fixed or determinable,determinable; and
 
 collectibilityCollectibility is reasonably assured.

     Generally, we doRevenue from sales of products is recognized when the title is passed to customers upon shipment and when collectibility is assured. The Company does not provide ourits customers with the right of return (except for quality), price protection, rebates or discounts. There are no customer acceptance provisions associated with ourthe Company’s products, other thanexcept for quality. All sales are based on firm customer orders with fixed terms and conditions, which generally cannot be modified. This requires us to assess at the point of delivery whether these criteria have been met. Upon making such assessment, revenue is recognized.

Inventory Reserves

     Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. We determine cost on the first-in, first-out basis. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, short-term customer commitments and rapid changes in demand, as well as many other market considerations. We write down inventory based on our regular reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product demand and production requirements from our customers. Generally, for our CEP reporting unit, we order inventory from our suppliers based on firm customer orders for product that is unique to each customer. The inventory is utilized in production as soon as all the necessary components are received.

35


     The only reason that inventory would not be utilized within six months is if a specific customer deferred or cancelled an order. As the inventory is typically unique to each customer’s product it is unusual for us to be able to utilize the inventory for other customers’ products. Therefore, our policy is to negotiate with the customer for the disposal of such inventory that remains unused for six months. We do not generally write down as these customers are held to their purchase commitments. However, there are cases where customers are contractually obligated to purchase the unused inventory from us but we may elect not to immediately enforce such contractual right for business reasons. In this connection, we will consider writing down for these inventory items which remain unused for over six months at our own cost. We determine if the inventory can be utilized in other products before writing down the inventory.

     For our LPT reporting unit, due to the nature of the business, LPT customers do not always place orders far enough in advance to enable us to order inventory from suppliers based on firm customer orders. Nonetheless, we review our inventory balance on a regular basis and wrote all inventory over six months old.

     We derive information concerning our customers’ inventory levels through constant communications with our significant customers. Customers that see indications of high inventory levels will communicate this fact to us and we will attempt to delay our production if we are able to reduce our own order commitments. Our ability to reduce orders from suppliers depends on the terms, conditions and timing of the request.

     In 2001, we wrote down our inventory for $3.8 million for slow-moving raw materials relating to cancelled, reduced or delayed orders. However, subsequently, we were able to use some of these raw materials in production in 2002 or we received compensation for the unused raw materials from certain of our customers, and the gain of $2.0 million was recorded in cost of sales during 2002.

Goodwill

     The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as goodwill. Prior to January 1, 2002, we amortized goodwill to expense on a straight-line basis over various periods ranging from 4 to 15 years.

     In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142,“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.This statement provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (i.e. a component) as defined in SFAS No. 131,“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. Through May 2002, we operated in two reporting units, which were the operating segments of “CEP” and “LPT”. Beginning in June 2002 we segregated our LPT segment into two reporting units: LCD panels and transformers. In June 2003, we sold our transformer operations.

     We evaluate the goodwill for impairment in two steps: (1) we identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill and (2) we measure the amount of goodwill loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill and recognizing a loss by the excess of the latter over the former. We measure the fair value of a reporting unit based on the quoted market prices, if available, internal models based on present value of future cash flows or independent valuations. The estimation of fair value requires that we make judgments concerning future cash flows and appropriate discount rates. Our estimate of the fair value of goodwill could change over time based on a variety of factors, including the actual operating performance of the underlying reporting units.

     SFAS No. 142 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. We adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we evaluated goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level and determined that there was no impairment at January 1, 2002. Later in 2002, we determined that goodwill was impaired by $339,000 related to Micro Business Systems Industries Company Limited (“MBS”). All remaining and future acquired goodwill will be subject to an annual impairment test on December 31st of each year or earlier if indications of a potential impairment exist. As of December 31, 2003, we completed our annual impairment evaluation and determined that there was no impairment.

Deferred Income Taxes

     We provide for all taxes based on profits whether due at year end or estimated to become due in future periods but based on profits earned to date. However, under the current tax legislation in the PRC, we have reasonable grounds to believe that income taxes paid

36


by Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd (formerly known as Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Ltd), Shenzhen Namtek Co. Ltd. and Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in respect of any year would be refunded after the profits earned in that year are reinvested in the business by way of capital injection. PRC taxes paid by subsidiaries during the year are recorded as amounts recoverable at the balance sheet date when we intend to file an application for reinvestment of profits and a refund is expected unless there is an indication from the PRC tax authority that the refund will be refused.

     We provide deferred income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, we recognize deferred income taxes for all significant temporary differences and classified as current or non-current based upon the classification of the related asset or liability in the financial statements. We provide a valuation allowance to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Investments

     We apply     When considering whether a valuation allowance is necessary, we will assess the equity methodhistory of accounting for investmentsoperating losses and unexpired tax credit, losses expected in affiliates when we have the ability to exercisefuture and any unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect future operations and profit levels on a significant influence, which is normally indicated by a 20% to 50% interestcontinuing basis in those entities. Under the equity method, original investments are recorded at cost and adjusted byfuture years. Therefore, any changes in our share of undistributed earnings or losses of these entities. Non-marketable investments in which we have a less than 20% interest and in which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee are accounted for using the cost method and are initially recorded at cost and periodically reviewed for impairment. Income from these investments are recognized to the extent of dividends received and gains or losses are recognized upon disposition or impairmentassessment of the investments.above would impact our estimation of the amount of valuation allowance.

Accruals and Provisions for Loss Contingencies

     We make provisions for all loss contingencies when information available to us prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.

     For provisions or accruals related to litigations, we make provisions based on information from legal counsels and the best estimation of management. As discussed in Note (19b) to our consolidated financial statements, we are involved in various legal proceedings and contingencies. We have recorded a liability for the Tele-Art matter in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” (“, or FAS 5”).5. FAS 5 requires a liability to be recorded based on our estimate of the probable cost of the resolution of a contingency. The actual resolution of this contingency may differ from our estimates. If the contingency were settled for an amount greater than our estimate, a future charge to income would result. Likewise, if the contingency were settled for an amount that is less than our estimate, a future credit to income would result.

Operating Results34


Results of Operations

The following table presents selected consolidated financial information stated as a percentage of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 (certain amounts may not calculate due to rounding and amounts may not add due to rounding).

                                     
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
  CEP LPT Total CEP LPT Total CEP LPT Total
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of sales  (88.3)  (81.0)  (87.2)  (83.4)  (86.5)  (83.9)  (83.7)  (83.7)  (83.7)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Gross profit  11.7   19.0   12.8   16.6   13.5   16.1   16.3   16.3   16.3 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (8.3)  (15.2)  (9.4)  (7.4)  (8.6)  (7.6)  (5.7)  (9.5)  (6.1)
Research and development expenses  (1.4)  (0.6)  (1.2)  (1.1)  (1.5)  (1.1)  (1.0)  (1.2)  (1.0)
Impairment of goodwill           (0.2)     (0.2)         
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income from operations  2.0   3.2   2.2   7.9   3.4   7.2   9.6   5.5   9.2 
Equity in income of affiliated companies  0.9      0.8   5.4      4.6   0.1      0.1 
Other income (expense)  0.5   5.1   1.2   (2.4)  (3.4)  (2.6)  1.8   (3.0)  1.4 
Interest expense  (0.1)  (0.0)  (0.1)  (0.4)  (0.2)  (0.3)     (0.3)   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests  3.3   8.3   4.1   10.5   (0.2)  8.9   11.6   2.2   10.7 
Income taxes benefit (expense)  (0.1)  (0.2)  (0.1)  (0.4)  (0.2)  (0.3)  (0.1)     (0.1)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) before minority interests  3.2   8.1   4.0   10.1   (0.4)  8.6   11.5   2.2   10.6 
Minority interests  (0.1)     (0.1)     (0.1)  (0.1)  (0.2)  (0.5)  (0.3)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income after minority interests  3.1   8.1   3.9   10.1   (0.5)  8.5   11.3   1.7   10.3 
Discontinued Operation                       4.8   0.5 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Net income (loss)  3.1%  8.1%  3.9%  10.1%  (0.5)%  8.5%  11.3%  6.5%  10.8%
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2002  2003  2004 
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of sales  (83.9)  (83.7)  (85.7)
          
Gross profit  16.1   16.3   14.3 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (7.6)  (6.1)  (5.2)
Research and development expenses  (1.1)  (1.0)  (1.0)
Impairment of goodwill  (0.2)      
          
Income from operations  7.2   9.2   8.1 
Other (expenses) income, net  (2.9)  0.7   3.2 
Gain on partial disposal of subsidiaries     0.5   14.5 
Unrealised loss on marketable securities        (10.9)
Interest income  0.3   0.2   0.2 
Interest expense  (0.3)      
          
Income before income taxes and minority interests  4.3   10.6   15.1 
Income taxes  (0.3)  (0.1)  (0.2)
          
Income before minority interests and equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  4.0   10.5   14.9 
Minority interests  (0.1)  (0.3)  (1.1)
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  4.6   0.1   (1.3)
          
Income after minority interests and equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  8.5   10.3   12.5 
Discontinued operation     0.5    
          
Net income  8.5%  10.8%  12.5%
          

Year endedEnded December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Net Sales.Our net sales increased 31.4% to $533.9 million for 2004, up from $406.3 million in 2003. The increase was due to increased sales levels across all business segments. Specific increases include a 27.0% increase in the sales of consumer electronics and communication products, a 36.4% increase in the sales of telecommunication components assembly, a 17.9% increase in the sales of LCD panels and a 20.6% increase in the sales of software development services. The increased sales levels were due to the addition of new customers, and organic growth in these business segments. The increase in the consumer electronics and communication products was primarily attributable to the increased sales levels in optical devices. The increase in telecom, components assembly was primarily attributable to sales of FPC sub-assemblies in 2004 and the increase in sales of levels of mobile phone handsets in SKD forms and lighting panels for hand-held devices.

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, revenue by business segments expressed as a percentage of net sales. The distribution of revenue across our business segments has fluctuated, and will continue to fluctuate, as a result of numerous factors, including but not limited to the following: increased business from new and existing customers, fluctuations in customer demand and seasonality.

             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2002  2003  2004 
Consumer Electronics and Communication Products  40%  32%  31%
Telecommunication Components Assembly :            
Telecommunication components assembly(1)  44%  57%  59%
Software development services  1%  1%  1%
LCD Panels and Transformers            
LCD panels  10%  9%  9%
Transformers(2)  5%  1%   
          
   100%  100%  100%
          


(1)  Included in telecommunication components assembly are our sales from our manufacture of rechargeable battery packs through a joint venture we had with Toshiba Battery Co., Ltd. We sold our interest in the joint venture to a Toshiba-related company and ceased manufacturing rechargeable battery packs as of April 30, 2002. Accordingly, revenue from sales of battery packs was not included after that date.
(2)  We sold our transformers operation to a third party in June 2003.

35


Gross Profit.Gross profit decreased to 14.3% of net sales in 2004 from 16.3% in 2003. Generally, the gross margin for box-built products is higher than key components assembly. Our target was to shift our business to the high-growth and high-technology key components assemblies sector, and we succeeded in increasing net sales in the TCA segment. The percentage decrease in gross profit was primarily due to a higher proportion of TCA segment revenue. Additionally, we have been impacted by the reduction of input credit in respect of value-added tax related to domestic purchase materials by the PRC government during 2004.

     In terms of dollar values, gross profit for 2004 increased by $10.2 million from 2003, due to the increased revenue base.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $28.1 million, or 5.2% of net sales in 2004 from $24.9 million, or 6.1% of net sales in 2003. The $3.2 million increase was primarily attributable to the increase in sales commission paid to marketing staff as a result of increased revenue, and the commission paid to external agents for particular products during 2004. The decrease as a percentage of net sales was due primarily to the increased revenue base in 2004.

Research and development Expenses.Research and development expenses in 2004 increased to $5.0 million from $4.0 million in 2003 but remained at 1.0% of net sales for each of 2004 and 2003. The absolute dollar increase was primarily attributable to the recruitment of more engineers to support our R&D activities, including design of production process, development of new products and products associated with customer design-related programs.

Other (Expenses) Income.During 2004, other income was $17.3 million. We received $17.4 million and $0.9 million dividend income from our investment in TCL Communication and TCL Corporation, respectively. This income was partially offset by $0.2 million in bank charges and $0.9 million in other non-operating charges.

     During 2003, other income was $2.9 million. The amount included dividend income of $2.0 million from our indirect investment in TCL Communication, dividend income of $1.7 million from TCL Corporation, and income of $0.5 million related to the recovery of a non-trade receivable which had been written off previously. This income was partially offset by $0.3 million in bank charges during 2003.

Gain on Partial Disposal of Subsidiaries.In April 2004, one of the previously wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, NTEEP, completed a public offering of its common stock on The Hong Kong Stock Exchange. As a result, the Company disposed of a 25% interest in this subsidiary, resulting in a gain on partial disposal of US$71.1 million.

     In November and December 2004, the Company disposed of 128 million ordinary shares of J.I.C. for cash consideration of $12.9 million. The disposal resulted in a net gain on partial disposal of interest in J.I.C. of $6.3 million after deducting the release of unamortized goodwill of $3.5 million.

     During 2003, we recorded a $1.8 million gain on partial disposal of interest in J.I.C.

Unrealized Loss of Marketable Securities. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s investment in TCL Communication was stated at fair value based on the traded market price of TCL Communication’s shares and the Company recognized an unrealized loss of $58.3 million, based on the Company’s cost of $79.5 million and a fair value of $21.2 million. As the loss is considered to be other-than-temporary, it has been recorded in the consolidated statements of income.

Interest Income. Interest income increased to $1.1 million in 2004 from $0.8 million in 2003. The increase was primarily due to higher average cash balances, partially offset by lower interest yields on cash deposits.

Interest Expense.Interest expense increased to $195,000 in 2004 from $121,000 in 2003. This increase was primarily a result of the draw-down of a $7.0 million fixed-term loan by J.I.C.

Income Taxes.Income tax expenses of $879,000 for 2004 compares to $399,000 for 2003. The increase was primarily the result of not receiving full tax refunds for several of our PRC entities for taxes paid in previous years that we have normally been eligible to receive full tax refunds in the past as a result of the strict enforcement of certain regulations.

Minority Interests.Minority interest increased to $6.0 million in 2004 from $1.1 million in 2003. The increase was primarily the result of the increase in minority shareholders’ share of NTEEP’s profit of approximately $4.9 million since its listing in April 2004. In addition, the minority shareholders’ share of profits of the J.I.C. Group for 2004 increased to $254,000 from $211,000 in 2003, and the minority shareholders’ share of profits of Namtek Software Development Company Limited for 2004 increased to $472,000 from $296,000 in 2003. The minority shareholders’ share of profits of Mate Fair for 2004 decreased to $405,000 from $560,000.

Equity in Income (Loss) of Affiliated Companies.We recorded an equity in loss of $6.8 million for 2004 of Alpha Star but recognized $0.5 million in equity in income for 2003. The amount in 2004 included an impairment charge of approximately $5.6 million upon careful assessment of various factors relevant to the affiliate, including the competitive handset market in the PRC and $1.2 million share of loss of Alpha Star. For additional information, see Note 8 — “Investment in Affiliated Companies, Equity Method – Alpha Star” to the Consolidated Statements of Income.

36


Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year endedEnded December 31, 2002

     Net Sales.Our net sales increased significantly by 72.2% to $406.3 million for 2003 compared to $236.0 million for 2002. Sales in the CEP segment increased by 81.8% to $365.0 million for 2003 compared to $200.8 million for 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to sales of the componenttelecommunication components assembly products of approximately $236.8$232.2 million in 2003 compared to $103.6$103.8 million in 2002, an increase of $133.2$128.4 million.

37


This increase was mainly as a result of an increase in sales of telecom LCD and PCB modules and the launch of new products in 2003, like RF modules, SKD handset, Front Light Panel Assembly,handsets, front light panel assembly, and flash light for cellular phones.

     In addition, we also experienced increased sales in the LCD consumer products segment.electronics and communication products. Sales of LCD consumer electronics and communication products amounted to approximately $124.1$128.8 million in 2003 compared to $94.2$94.0 million in 2002, an increase of $29.9$34.8 million. This increase was mainly driven by the PC camera, which was first launched in 2003.

     Sales in the LPT segmentof LCD panels and transformers increased by 17.2% to $41.3 million for 2003 compared to $35.3 million for 2002. The primary reason for the increase in sales of LCD panels and transformers was the increase in the sales of LCD panels of approximately $35.0 million for 2003 compared to $23.9 million for 2002, which was partially offset by a decrease in the sales of transformers due to the disposal of the transformers operation in June 2003.

     Gross Profit.Our gross profit increased by 74.2% to $66.3 million for 2003 compared to $38.1 million for 2002. Our gross profit margin also increased slightly in 2003 to 16.3% from 16.1% in 2002.

     Gross profit in the CEP segment increased 78.8% to $59.6 million, or 16.3% of net sales, for 2003 compared to $33.3 million, or 16.6% of net sales, for 2002.     The primary reason for this increase was the increase in sales as described above in the explanation of fluctuation of “Net Sales”. We were also able to keep our product gross margin relatively stable in 2003. The increase in gross profit margin was offset by the gain of a $2.0 million due to the recovery of inventory written down to cost of sales in 2002. In addition to these specific factors, our gross profit margin increased in 2003 due to our ability to negotiate advantageous price terms with certain of our suppliers and our focus on reducing overhead costs.

     GrossIn addition, the gross profit inof the LPT segment increased 41.9% to $6.7 million, or 16.3% of net sales, for 2003 compared to $4.8 million, or 13.5% of net sales, for 2003.also increased. This increase in gross profit in the LPT segment was as a result of increases in the sales proportion of high margin products and the disposal of the transformers operation in June 2003. The impact of the discontinued operations of transformers on gross profit contribution was insignificant as the margin of transformers products was low.

     Selling, generalGeneral and administrative expenses.Administrative Expenses.SG&A expenses for 2003 increased by approximately $6.9 million to $24.9 million, or 6.1% of net sales, from $18.0 million, or 7.6% of net sales, in 2002.

     SG&A expenses in the CEP segment increased 39.9% to $20.9 million, or 5.7% of net sales, for 2003 compared to $14.9 million, or 7.4% of net sales, for 2002.     This increase was primarily due to an approximately $4.9$5.1 million increase in salaries and benefits expenses, due to an increase in headcount, an approximately 10% increase in salary for certain employees and $3.7a $3.9 million incentive bonus due to the implementation of a new incentive bonus scheme in January 2003, which was calculated based on operating profit, as well as a $0.8$0.9 million increase in selling expenses, which was primarily due to more sales commissioncommissions paid as sales increased.

     SG&A expenses in our LPT segment also increased in 2003 to $4.0 million, or 9.5% of net sales, from $3.0 million, or 8.6% of net sales, in 2002. The increase in SG&A expenses in our LPT segment in 2003 was primarily related to salaries and benefits expenses as a result of the implementation of a new incentive bonus program scheme in January 2003 and hence $0.2 million in incentive bonuses incurred during 2003 and general expenses due to an increase in business activities.

     Our SG&A expenses include provisions for bad debt expenses, which decreased from $138,000 in 2002 to $91,000 in 2003. On a segment basis, the provision for bad debt expenses decreased in the CEP segment from $89,000 in 2002 to zero in 2003 and increased in the LPT segment from $49,000 in 2002 to $91,000 in 2003. For the CEP segment, theThe decrease in allowance has been attributable to the implementation of tighter credit controls. For the LPT segment, the increase in the allowance was due to the increase in accounts receivable and a resulting increase in our general provision due to a delay in payment from some customers.

     Research and development expenses.Development Expenses.Research and development expenses for 2003 increased to $4.0 million, or 1.0% of net sales, from $2.7 million, or 1.1% of net sales, in 2002. On a segment basis, research and development expenses increased in the CEP segment by $1,385,000, or 64.1%,The increase was due to an increase in the number of staff related to the expansion of our production capacity and the products we manufacture.

     Goodwill impairment.Impairment.In 2002, we determined that $339,000 of unamortized goodwill related to our 1999 acquisition of a telecommunications company was impaired as the technology of the acquired company had become obsolete.

38Other (Expenses)/Income, Net.Other income, net, during 2003 was $2.9 million. This amount included dividend income of $2.0 million from our indirect investment in Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., dividend income of $1.7 million from TCL Corporation and income of $0.5 million related to the recovery of a non-trade receivable which had been written off previously. This income was partially offset by a $0.3 million bank charge during 2003.


Gain on Partial Disposal of Subsidiaries. Gain on partial disposal of subsidiaries in 2003 of $1.8 million represented gain on partial disposal of interests in J.I.C. Technology while the amount in 2002 of $17,000 represented the gain on disposal of a subsidiary, BPC (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.

Interest income. Interest income decreased to $788,000 in 2003 from $799,000 in 2002 due to lower average cash balances and lower interest yields on cash deposits.

     Income from Operations.Interest Expense.Income from operations increased by approximately $20.3 millionInterest expense decreased to $37.4 million, or 9.2% of net sales,$121,000 for 2003 compared to $17.1 million, or 7.2% of net sales,$790,000 for 2002. OnThe decrease in interest expenses is the result of the early repayment of a segment basis, the operating income of our CEP segment increased $19.2$12.9 million bank loan in January 2003.

37


Income Taxes.Income tax expenses decreased to $35.1 million, or 9.6% of net sales, in 2003 compared to $15.9 million, or 7.9% of net sales, in 2002. The operating income of our LPT segment increased $1.1 million to $2.3 million, or 5.5% of net sales,$399,000 for 2003 compared to $1.2 million,$773,000 for the prior year. The decrease is primarily the result of our receipt of tax refunds for several of our PRC entities for taxes paid in previous years.

Minority Interests.Minority interests increased by $903,000, or 3.4% of net sales,550.6%, to $1,067,000 in 2003 from $164,000 in 2002. This increaseMinority interests in operating income is attributable to2003 included $211,000 from the increase in gross profit described above.minority shareholders’ share of profits of the J.I.C. Group for 2003, $560,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of Mate Fair for 2003 and $296,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of Namtek Software Development Company Ltd. for 2003.

     Equity in Income of Affiliated Companies.Equity in income of affiliated companies was $0.5 million in 2003 compared to $10.7 million in 2002. The income in 2003 represents our share of the net earnings of our proportional 25% investment in Alpha Star Investments Limited for the twelve months endended December 31, 2003. The income in 2002 represents our proportional share of the net earnings of our 25% investment in Mate Fair.

Other Income/(Expense), net.Other income, net, during the year ended December 31, 2003 was $5.5 million. This amount included dividend income of $2.0 million from our indirect investment in Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd, dividend income of $1.7 million from TCL Corporation, $1.8 million of gain on partial disposal of interest in our J.I.C. Group and income of $0.5 million related to the recovery of a non-trade receivable which had been written off previously. This income was partially offset by a $0.3 million bank charge during 2003.

Interest Expense.Interest expense decreased to $121,000 for 2003 compared to $790,000 for 2002. The decrease in interest expenses is the result of the early repayment of a $12.9 million bank loan in January 2003.

Income Taxes.Income tax expenses decreased to $399,000 for 2003 compared to $773,000 for the prior year. The decrease is primarily the result of our receipt of tax refunds for several of our PRC entities for taxes paid in previous years.

Minority Interest.Minority interest increased $903,000, or 550.6%, to $1,067,000 in 2003 from $164,000 in 2002. Minority interest in 2003 included $211,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of J.I.C. Group for the year ended December 31, 2003, $560,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of Mate Fair for the year ended December 31, 2003, and $296,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of Namtek Software Development Company Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2003.

     Discontinued Operation.Discontinued operation in 2003 representsrepresented $2.0 million gain on disposal of our entire transformers operation, net of $0.1 million shared by minority interest.

Net Income.Net income increased by $23.8 million, or 118.8%, to $43.8 million or 10.8% of net sales, for 2003 compared to $20.0 million, or 8.5% of net sales, for 2002. Net income of $43.8 million for 2003 represents $41.8 million income from normal operation, and $2.0 million income from discontinued operation. Diluted earnings per share for 2003 of $1.07 ($1.09 basic) was contributed by $1.02 ($1.04 basic) from normal operations, and $0.05 ($0.05 basic) from discontinued operation. This resulted in diluted earnings per share for 2003 of $1.07 ($1.09 basic) compared to $0.57 ($0.57 basic) for 2002. Net income for the CEP segment increased 103.3% to $41.1 million for 2003 compared to $20.2 million for 2002. The increase in CEP’s net income is the result of higher sales, higher gross profit margin, and the increase in other income, which was offset by the decrease in equity in income from affiliated companies and increased general and administrative expenses described above. Net income for the LPT segment increased by $2.9 million, or 1513.6%, to a income of $2.7 million in 2003 compared to net loss of $191,000 for 2002. The increase in the LPT segment’s net income is the result of the $2.0 million gain from the disposal of the transformers operation, net of $0.1 million shared by minority interest, in June 2003, increase in sales and higher gross profit margin.

Year ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year ended December 31, 2001

Net Sales.Our net sales remained flat, increasing by 0.9%, to $236.0 million for 2002 compared to $234.0 million for 2001. Sales in the CEP segment increased by 1.4% to $200.8 million for 2002 compared to $198.0 million for 2001. The primary reason for the increase was sales of digital camera accessories for cellular phones that we first produced in 2001 of approximately $39.8 million in 2002 compared to only $3.2 million in 2001, an increase of $36.6 million. This increase was partially offset by the sale of our joint venture interest in BPC (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. to a Toshiba related company on April 30, 2002, resulting in a decrease in our sales of approximately $13.2 million in 2002 as compared to sales in 2001. We also experienced decreased sales in 2002 of calculators, personal digital assistants and linguistics products and LCD modules of $9.6 million, $6.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively, as compared to levels in 2001. We believe that these decreases resulted from pricing pressures and the completion of the lifecycle or obsolescence of certain of these products that were not replaced by comparable devices.

39


     Sales in the LPT segment decreased by 1.9% to $35.3 million for 2002 compared to $36.0 million for 2001. The primary reason for the decrease in sales was the reduction in LCD panel selling prices caused by market competition, which was partially offset by an increase in the number of LCD panels sold.

Gross Profit.Our gross profit increased by 26.7%, to $38.1 million for 2002 from $30.0 million for 2001. Our gross profit margin also increased in 2002 to 16.1% from 12.8% in 2001. Before the inventory write-down of $3.8 million in 2001 for slow-moving raw materials relating to cancelled, returned or delayed orders and our gain of $2.0 million recorded in cost of sales during 2002 discussed below, our consolidated gross margin was 14.5% in 2001 and 15.3% in 2002.

     Gross profit in the CEP segment increased by 43.7% to $33.3 million, or 16.6% of net sales, for 2002 compared to $23.2 million, or 11.7% of net sales, for 2001. The primary reason for this increase was our inventory write-down in 2001 of $3.8 million for slow-moving raw materials relating to cancelled, reduced or delayed orders within the CEP segment that was recorded in our cost of sales. In 2002, we were able to use some of these raw materials in production or we received compensation for the unused raw materials from certain of our customers, resulting in our gain of $2.0 million to cost of sales in 2002. For the inventory that we were able to use, we sold the related products to customers at our normal prices. Also contributing to the increase in gross profit in 2002 is a $300,000 charge to our cost of sales in 2001 related to employee severance charges for direct labor in the CEP segment. In addition to these specific factors, our gross profit increased in 2002 due to our ability to negotiate advantageous price terms with certain of our suppliers and our focus on reducing overhead costs.

     Gross profit in the LPT segment decreased by 30.7% to $4.8 million, or 13.5% of net sales, for 2002 compared to $6.8 million, or 19.0% of net sales, for 2001 as a result of lower selling prices for LCD panels driven by increased competition as well as increased depreciation charges in relation to a new STN LCD panel line that commenced operations in June 2002.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.SG&A expenses for 2002 decreased approximately $4.0 million to $18.0 million, or 7.6% of net sales, from $22.0 million, or 9.4% of net sales, in 2001.

     SG&A expenses in the CEP segment decreased by 9.6% to $14.9 million, or 7.4% of net sales, for 2002 compared to $16.5 million, or 8.3% of net sales, for 2001. This decrease was driven primarily by our cost realignment and tightened cost controls that reduced salaries and benefits to $6.0 million from $8.1 million in 2001. Our salaries and benefits expense in 2001 included $700,000 of restructuring expenses primarily related to severance for certain administrative positions that we eliminated. The decreases in our CEP segment were partially offset by increases in selling expenses of $600,000 due to implementation of a new commission incentive program in January 2002.

     SG&A expenses in our LPT segment also decreased in 2002 to $3.0 million, or 8.6% of net sales, from $5.5 million, or 15.2% of net sales, in 2001. The decrease in SG&A expenses in our LPT segment in 2002 is primarily related to terminating the amortization of goodwill as a result of our adoption of the new accounting rule, SFAS No. 142, effective January 1, 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2001, our amortization of goodwill in the LPT segment was approximately $1.6 million. SG&A expenses in our LPT segment were also lower in 2002 due to a stock option compensation expense of $839,000 in 2001, but none in 2002.

     Our SG&A expenses include provisions for bad debt expenses, which increased from $86,000 in 2001 to $138,000 in 2002. On a segment basis, the provision for bad debt expenses increased in the CEP segment from $55,000 in 2001 to $89,000 in 2002 and increased in the LPT segment from $31,000 in 2001 to $49,000 in 2002. Our policy for the allowance for doubtful amounts is to provide for all invoices that are 30 days overdue from their original credit terms and for which settlement is not assured. The increase in the allowance was due to the increase in accounts receivable and a resulting increase in our general provision and a delay in payment from some customers.

Research and development expenses.Research and development expenses for 2002 decreased to $2.7 million, or 1.1% of net sales, from $3.0 million, or 1.2% of net sales, in 2001. On a segment basis, research and development expenses decreased in the CEP segment by $584,000, or 21.3%, due to a reduction in related staff, which was partially offset by an increase in the LPT segment of $316,000 in relation to the addition of a new STN LCD line for the development of new products, including LCD panels for TCL Mobile.

40


Goodwill impairment.In 2002, we determined that $339,000 of unamortized goodwill related to our 1999 acquisition of a telecommunications company was impaired as the technology of the acquired company had become obsolete.

Income from Operations.Income from operations increased by approximately $11.9 million to $17.1 million, or 7.2% of net sales, for 2002 compared to $5.1 million, or 2.2% of net sales, for 2001. On a segment basis, the operating income of our CEP segment increased $12.0 million to $15.9 million, or 7.9% of net sales, in 2002 compared to $3.9 million, or 2.0% of net sales, in 2001. This increase in operating income is attributable to the increase in gross profit and decrease in SG&A expenses and R&D expenses described above. The operating income of our LPT segment remained constant at $1.2 million in both 2002 and 2001.

Equity in Income of Affiliated Companies.Equity in income of affiliated companies was $10.7 million in 2002 compared to $1.9 million in 2001. The income in 2002 includes $8.6 million, which represents our share of the gain from the sale by Mate Fair of a portion of its interest in TCL Mobile, and $2.1 million for our proportional share of the net earnings of our 25% investment in Mate Fair for the five months ended May 31, 2002.

Other Income/(Expense), net.Other expense, net, during the year ended December 31, 2002 was $6.0 million. This amount included expenses of $5.2 million for our provision of legal contingencies related to the liquidation of Tele-Art Inc., $2.7 million of loss related to the creation of a minority interest in our J.I.C. Group subsidiary, including the release of unamortized goodwill, $1.4 million of legal and professional fees related to the J.I.C. minority interest transaction, $610,000 of finance charges related to the early repayment of a $12.9 million fixed term loan, $520,000 for release of unamortized goodwill of an affiliated company, Mate Fair, $307,000 of finance charges and $771,000 of miscellaneous expenses primarily related to non-operating legal fees. These expenses were partially offset by gains of $3.3 million related to the partial recovery of a judgment debt in the Tele-Art case, net of expenses, $917,000 of dividend income primarily from our indirect investment in TCL Corporation, $799,000 of interest income and $642,000 of realized gain from the disposal of marketable securities. The costs of defending the recently announced securities class action litigation could substantially increase our expenses in future periods and any adverse determination could be significant.

Interest Expense.Interest expenses increased to $790,000 for 2002 compared to $178,000 for 2001. The increase in interest expenses was the result of $15 million in long-term debt that we obtained in the fourth quarter of 2001 and $4.5 million obtained in the second quarter of 2002.

Income Taxes.Income tax expenses of $773,000 for 2002 compares to $227,000 for 2001. The increase was primarily the result of not receiving tax refunds for two of our PRC entities for taxes paid in previous years that we have normally been eligible to receive in the past.

Minority Interest.Minority interest decreased $66,000, or 28.7%, to $164,000 in 2002 from $230,000 in 2001. Minority interest in 2002 included $107,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of BPC from January 1, 2002 through April 30, 2002, the date we sold BPC and $57,000 from the minority shareholders’ share of profits of J.I.C. Group from June 4, 2002, the date of listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, through December 31, 2002. Minority interest in 2001 represented an entire year of the minority shareholder’s share of BPC’s profit.

Net Income.Net income increased by $11.0 million, or 121.4%, to $20.0 million or 8.5% of net sales, for 2002 compared to $9.0 million, or 3.9% of net sales, for 2001. This resulted in diluted earnings per share for 2002 of $0.57 ($0.57 basic) compared to $0.26 ($0.27 basic) for 2001. Net income for the CEP segment increased 230% to $20.2 million for 2002 compared to $6.1 million for 2001. The increase in CEP’s net income is the result of a higher gross profit margin, the increase in equity in income from affiliated companies, and decreased general and administrative expenses described above. Net income for the LPT segment decreased by $3.1 million or 106.6% to a loss of $191,000 compared to net income of $2.9 million for 2001. The net loss position in year 2002 for the LPT segment was the result of lower gross profit margin, and the release of unamortized goodwill as described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

     We have financed our growth and cash needs to date primarily from internally generated funds, proceeds from the sale of our strategic investments, sales of our common stock and bank debt. We do not use off-balance sheet financing arrangements, such as securitization of receivables or obtaining access to assets through special purpose entities, as sources of liquidity. Our primary uses of cash have been to fund expansions and upgrades of our manufacturing facilities, to make strategic investments in potential customers and suppliers and to fund increases in inventory and accounts receivable resulting from increased sales.

41


     We had positive net working capital of $96.8$218.2 million at December 31, 20032004 compared to positive net working capital of $87.4$93.5 million at December 31, 2002.2003. Our working capital requirements and capital expenditures could continue to increase in order to support future expansions of our operations through acquisition of land, construction of a new factory and machinery purchases. It is possible that future expansions may be significant and may require the payment of cash. Future liquidity needs will also depend on fluctuations in levels of inventory and shipments, changes in customer order volumes and timing of expenditures for new equipment.

     We currently believe that during the next twelve months, our capital expenditures will be in the range of $35 million to $55 million, principally for land, machinery and equipment, and expansion in China. We believe that our level of resources, which include cash flows from operations, our currentand cash balanceequivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable and funds available borrowings under our working capital and credit facilities, will be sufficientadequate to meetfund these capital expenditures and our working capital needs and planned capital expendituresrequirements for the next 12twelve months. Should we desire to consummate significant additional acquisition opportunities or undertake significant expansion activities, our capital needs would increase and could possibly result in our need to increase available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities or access public or private debt and equity markets. There can be no assurance, however, that we would be successful in raising additional debt or equity on terms that we would consider acceptable.

     The following table sets forth, for the year ended December 31 2002, 2003 and 2004, selected consolidated cash flow information (in thousands):

             
  Year Ended December 31, 
    
  2002  2003  2004 
Net cash provided by operating activities $39,502  $44,272  $75,210 
             
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (33,760)  (21,669)  37,729 
             
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  18,085   (43,253)  (14,117)
             
Effect of foreign currencies on cash flows  (26)      
          
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $23,801  $(20,650) $98,822 
          

38


     Net cash provided by operating activities for 2004 was $75.2 million. This consisted primarily of $66.9 million of net income, $13.9 million of depreciation and amortization, $58.3 million unrealized loss on marketable securities, $6.8 million equity in loss of an affiliated company and $6.0 million in minority interests offset by $6.2 million in gain on partial disposal of J.I.C., $71.1 million gain on partial disposal of NTEEP and $15.9 million in dividend income. Our working capital related to operating activities increased, driven by an increase of $33.9 million in accounts payable and $3.0 million in accrued expenses and others payables, a decrease of $2.6 million in amount due from a related party, $3.9 million in inventories and $2.6 million in prepaid expenses and other receivables, offset by increases in accounts receivable of $28.3 million. The increase in accounts receivable and accounts payable was due to increased levels of business during 2004.

     Net cash provided by investing activities of $37.7 million for 2004 consisted primarily of proceeds from partial disposal of subsidiaries and investments of $95.4 million and $5.6 million, respectively, proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment of $4.5 million, offset by capital expenditures of $38.6 million and increase in deposits for property, plant and equipment of $4.4 million and acquisition of marketable securities of TCL Communication of $25.1 million. Capital expenditure in 2004 mainly consisted of the construction of a new factory and purchases of machinery and equipment which were used to expand our manufacturing capacity and to upgrade our equipment to produce increasingly complex products.

     Net cash used in financing activities of $14.1 million for 2004 resulted primarily from $19.4 million paid to shareholders as dividends, $5.4 million in repayment of bank loans, offset by proceeds of bank loans of $10.6 million.

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $41.2$44.3 million in 2003. Cash provided by operating activities in 2003 was primarily attributable to net income of $43.8 million plus depreciation and amortization expense of $12.3$12.2 million, offset by the gain on disposal of a transformers operation, net of minority interests of $2.0 million and a gain on the partial disposal of our JICJ.I.C. Group for $1.8 million. Our working capital related to operating activities net of the effect of the disposal of a subsidiary decreased, driven by an increase of $11.1 million in accounts receivables, $6.1receivable, $3.0 million in prepaid expenses and other receivables, and prepaid expenses, $2.7 million in the amount due from a related party and $8.5 million in inventories, which was offset by increases in accounts payable of $18.0 million, and accrued expenses and other payables and accrued expenses of $1.2 million.

     Our inventories increased in 2003 as a result of our anticipation of increases in sales. Accounts receivable increased due to an increase in sales in the fourth quarter relative to sales in the prior year period. The increase in prepaid expenses and other receivables was mainly due to a $3.1 million increase in deposits for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment related to our business operation.year. Accounts payable increased due to increased inventory purchases. Accrued expenses increased due to the provision of an incentive bonus in this year.

     Net cash provided by operating activities was $39.5 million in 2002. Cash provided by operating activities in 2002 was primarily attributable to net income of $20.0 million plus depreciation and amortization expense of $10.6 million, dividend income from affiliated companies of $10.5 million and the non-cash loss on the reverse merger transaction related to our JIC Group of $2.7 million, non-cash equity in income of affiliated companies of $10.7 million, release of unamortized goodwill of affiliated companies of $520,000, realized gain on marketable securities of $642,000 and non-cash shares redemption and dividend withheld in settlement of a receivable of $3.5 million. Our working capital related to operating activities net of the effect of the disposal of a subsidiary also decreased, driven by an increase of $17.0 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses and $10.1 million of proceeds from marketable securities, offset by increases in accounts receivable of $8.5 million and inventory of $7.6 million.

     Our inventory increased in 2002 as a result of our anticipation of increases in sales. Accounts receivable increased due to increased sales in the fourth quarter relative to sales in the prior year period. The increase in accrued expenses was primarily related to a $5.2 million provision for legal contingencies. Accounts payable increased due to support for higher inventory levels. The proceeds from marketable securities relates to the disposal of our holdings in Deswell Industries, Inc. during 2002.2003.

     Net cash used in investing activities was $18.6$21.7 million in 2003. Cash used in investing activities primarily related to our $10.0 million and $0.4 million strategic investments in Alpha Star Investments Limited and iMagic Infomedia Technology Limited, respectively, and $5.3 million prepayment for long terma long-term investment in Stepmind, as well as capital expenditures of $17.1 million and an increase in deposits for property, plant and equipment of $3.1 million, offset by $2.6 million proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment, $2.4 million proceeds on disposal of transformers operation to a third party, $4.0 million proceeds on the partial disposal of our J.I.C. Group, and $5.0 million proceeds on the disposal of convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd.

     Net cash used in investing activities was $33.8 million in 2002. Cash used in investing activities primarily related to our $12.0 million strategic investment in TCL Corporation and $5.1 million in convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd., as well as capital expenditures of $18.5 million, offset by proceeds of $1.7 million related to the disposal of our joint venture interest in BPC. Our capital expenditures in 2002 included a $12.3 million new STN LCD panel production line and $4.0 million for completion of the new factory expansion.

     In the past three years, we have invested significant amounts of cash to expand our manufacturing capacity and to upgrade our equipment to produce increasingly complex products. We believe that we will continue to make significant cash investments in the future to broaden our manufacturing capabilities and increase our capacity. In this regard, we intend to spend approximately $40.0 million to construct and equip another factory consisting of approximately 250,000 square feet on land adjacent to our principal manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen, China, of which $1.2 million has already been spent in 2003.

42


     Net cash used in financing activities was $43.3 million in 2003. Cash used in financing activities for 2003 primarily resulted from $37.8 million paid to shareholders as dividends and $14.0 million in bank loans repayment offset by $8.5 million received from the exercise of options.

     Net cash provided by financing activities was $18.1 million for 2002. Cash provided by financing activities for 2002 primarily resulted from net proceeds of $36.5 million received from the exercise of options and warrants and $4.5 million received from a four-year variable rate term loan, offset by $16.7 million paid to shareholders as dividends, $2.7 million for the repayment of bank loans and $3.5 million for the repurchase of our common shares pursuant to our share buy-back program.

     Except as discussed above, there are no material transactions, arrangements and relationships with unconsolidated affiliated entities that are reasonably likely to affect liquidity.

     For the years ended December 31, 20022003 and 2003,2004, the Company has made guarantees for debt, loans and credit facilities held by various wholly owned subsidiaries aggregating up to a maximum guarantee of $62,616,000$49,756,000 and $49,756,000,$49,205,000, respectively. The terms of the guarantees correspond with the terms of the underlying debt, loan and credit facility agreements.

Capital Resources

     In July 2003, we filed a registration statement on Form F-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to a proposed offering of 9,000,000 common shares, of which 6,000,000 common shares were to be offered by us and 3,000,000 common shares were to be offered by selling shareholders. We intended to use a portion of the net proceeds to construct and equip a new factory of approximately 250,000 square feet adjacent to our principal manufacturing facilities in Shenzhen, China. We intended to use the balance of the net proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

     In September 2003, we withdrew the registration statement. Despite our capital expenditures proceeding as scheduled, we believe that our cash on hand, future cash generated from operation, together with other income and outstanding banking facilities, should be sufficient for both our long-term and short-term capital needs.

     As of December 31, 2003,2004, we had $61.8$160.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, consisting of cash and short-term deposits, compared to $82.5$61.8 million atas of December 31, 2002.2003. Our short-term debtlong-term bank borrowing was $3.0$8.0 million and $15.0$2.8 million atas of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, andrespectively.

39


     As of December 31, 2002, respectively.

     At December 31, 2003,2004, we had in place general banking facilities with two financial institutions aggregating $62.3$87.9 million. The maturity of these facilities is generally up to 90 days. These banking facilities are guaranteed by us and there is an undertaking not to pledge any assets to any other banks without the prior consent of our bankers. However, these covenants do not have any impact on our ability to undertake additional debt or equity financing. Interest rates are generally based on the banks’ reference lending rates. Our facilities permit us to obtain overdrafts, lines of credit for forward exchange contracts, letters of credit, import facilities, trust receipt financing, shipping guarantees, working capital and working capital.revolving loans. No significant commitment fees are required to be paid for the banking facilities. These facilities are subject to annual review and approval. As of December 31, 2003,2004, we had utilized approximately $8.3$3.4 million under such general credit facilities and had available unused credit facilities of $54.0$84.5 million.

     We had a seven-year term loan in October 2001 totaling $15.0 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.05% in the first four years and at a rate of 1% over the Singapore Interbank Money Market Offer Rate for the following three years. The loan was secured by a property with net book value of $11.4 million. At December 31, 2002, the bank loan had an outstanding balance of $12,860,000. On January 3, 2003, we repaid the entire outstanding balance due to the bank, resulting in a finance charge on early repayment of $610,000, which was expensed in 2002.

     As of December 31, 2003,2004, we had bank borrowingtwo four-year term loans, which allowed us to borrow up to a maximum amount of $2.8$4.5 million including the current portion of $1.1and $7.0 million. The outstanding balance amounted to $8.1 million compared to bank borrowing of $16.8 million, including the current portion of $14.0 million at December 31, 2002.

     Our bank borrowing as of December 31, 2003 represents unsecured long-term bank borrowing of $4.52004 and $2.8 million that we obtained in May 2002. This bank borrowing has a term of four years and bears interest of 1.5% over three-month LIBOR (with a cap at 7.5%), with principal repayments of $281,250 due on a quarterly basis.

43


     A summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 20032003. Here is an analysis of the term loans:

                                 
                          Outstanding  Outstanding 
  Date of         Amount          balance at  balance at 
  draw  Amount  No. of  per  Interest  First  December 31,  December 31, 
  down  drawn  installments  installment  rate  repayment  2004  2003 
     (in million)     (in million)        (in million) 
Term loan 1 May 2002 $4.5   16  $0.3  1.5% over LIBOR, changed to 0.75% over LIBOR in August 2004 August 2002 $1.7  $2.8 
Term loan 2                                
  April 2004 $1.6   16  $0.1  0.75% over LIBOR July 2004 $1.4    
  June 2004 $3.6   16  $0.2  0.75% over LIBOR September 2004 $3.2    
  December 2004 $1.8   16  $0.1  0.75% over LIBOR March 2005 $1.8    
                               
Total                         $8.1  $2.8 
                               

     Our contractual obligations for long-term debt arrangements and future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements as follows:

                             
  Payments due by period
  
                          2009 and
Contractual obligation Total 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 thereafter

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term bank borrowing $2,813,000  $1,125,000  $1,125,000  $563,000  $  $  $ 
Operating leases  8,885,000   1,045,000   1,037,000   988,000   1,070,000   1,087,000   3,658,000 
Capital expenditures  34,161,000   34,161,000                
Purchase obligations  54,543,000   54,543,000                
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total $100,402,000  $90,874,000  $2,162,000  $1,551,000  $1,070,000  $1,087,000   3,658,000 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
of December 31, 2004 are summarized below. We do not participate in, or secure financing for, any unconsolidated limited purpose entities. Non-cancelable purchase commitments do not typically extend beyond the normal lead-time of several weeks at most. Purchase orders beyond this time frame are typically cancelable.
                             
  Payments due by period 
    
                          2010 and 
Contractual obligation Total  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  thereafter 
Long-term bank $8,038,000  $2,875,000  $2,313,000  $1,750,000  $1,100,000  $  $ 
borrowing                            
Operating leases  9,136,000   1,243,000   1,116,000   1,169,000   1,215,000   1,215,000   3,178,000 
Capital expenditures  17,080,000   17,080,000                
Purchase obligations  115,136,000   115,136,000                
Total $149,390,000  $136,334,000  $3,429,000  $2,919,000  $2,315,000  $1,215,000   3,178,000 

     There are no material restrictions (including foreign exchange controls) on the ability of our non-China subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form of cash dividends, loans, advances or product or material purchases. With respect to our China subsidiaries, with the exception of a requirement that 10% of profits be reserved for future developments, there are no restrictions on the payment of dividends and the removal of dividends from China once all taxes are paid and assessed and losses, if any, from previous years have been made good. In the event that dividends are paid by our China subsidiaries, such dividends will reduce the amount of reinvested profits and, accordingly, the refund of taxes paid will be reduced to the extent of tax applicable to profits not reinvested.

Impact of Inflation

     Inflation and deflation in China, and Hong Kong and Macao has not had a material effect on our past business. During times of inflation, we have generally been able to increase the price of its products in order to keep pace with inflation.

40


Exchange Controls

     There are no exchange control restrictions on payments of dividends, interest, or other payments to nonresident holders of our securities or on the conduct of our operations in Hong Kong and Macao, where the offices of some of our subsidiaries are located, or in the British Virgin Islands, where we are incorporated. Other jurisdictions in which we conduct operations may have various exchange controls. With respect to our China subsidiaries, with the exception of a requirement that 10% of profits be reserved for future developments, there are no restrictions on the payment of dividends and the removal of dividends from China once all taxes are paid and assessed and losses, if any, from previous years have been made good. We believe such restrictions will not have a material effect on our liquidity or cash flows.

Recent changesChanges in accounting standardsAccounting Standards

     In January 2003,March 2004, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, reached a consensus in EITF 03-1,ConsolidationThe Meaning of Variable Interest EntitiesOther-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. FIN 46 requiresThe consensus was that if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilitiescertain quantitative and results of the activities of the variable interest entityqualitative disclosures should be included in consolidated financial statements ofrequired for debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS Nos. 115 and 124, that are impaired at the business enterprise. FIN 46 (Revised) applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 (Revised) are effective beginning January 1, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 (Revised) isbalance sheet date but for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operation, or cash flows.

     In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including derivatives embedded in other contracts and hedging activities. SFAS No. 149 amends SFAS No. 133 for decisions made by the FASB as part of its Derivatives Implementation Group process. SFAS No. 149 also amends SFAS No. 133 to incorporate clarifications of the definition of a derivative. SFAS No. 149been recognized. This EITF consensus is effective for contracts entered into or modified and hedging relationships designatedfiscal years ending after June 30,December 15, 2003. The provisionsAdoption of SFAS No. 149the EITF consensus did not have a materialresult in an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     In May 2003,November 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150151, “Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 clarifies the accounting that requires abnormal amounts of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs, and spoilage costs to be recognized as current-period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred on or after July 1, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,“Share-Based Payment”. This statement is a revision to SFAS No. 123 and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25. This statement establishes standards for howthe accounting for transactions in which an issuer classifiesentity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, primarily focusing on the accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. Entities will be required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service, the requisite service period (usually the vesting period), in exchange for the award. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and measures certain financialsimilar instruments will be estimated using option pricing models. If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. This statement is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. In accordance with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.the standard, the Company will adopt SFAS No. 150 requires123R effective July 1, 2005.

     Upon adoption, the Company has two application methods to choose from: the modified-prospective transition approach or the modified-retrospective transition approach. Under the modified-prospective transition method, the Company would be required to recognize compensation cost for share-based awards to employees based on their grant-date fair value from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied, as well as compensation cost for awards that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scopewere granted prior to, but not vested as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances).of the date of adoption. Prior periods remain unchanged and pro forma disclosures previously required by SFAS No. 150123 continue to be required. Under the modified-retrospective transition method, the Company would restate prior periods by recognizing compensation cost in the amounts previously reported in the pro forma footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123. Under this method, the Company is effectivepermitted to apply this presentation to all periods presented or to the start of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 123R is adopted. The Company would follow the same guidelines as in the modified-prospective transition method for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003,awards granted subsequent to adoption and otherwise is effective forthose that were granted and not yet vested. The Company has not yet determined which methodology it will adopt but believes that the third quarter of 2003. Theimpact that the adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not123R will have a material impact on the Company’sits financial position or results of operations or cash flows.will approximate the magnitude of the stock-based employee compensation cost disclosed in Note 2 (p) pursuant to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148.

4441


QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Currency FluctuationsResearch and Development

     Our research and development expenditure mainly comprised of salaries and benefits paid to our research and development personnel and is mainly for the development of advanced manufacturing techniques to produce complex products on a mass scale and at a low cost. We sell a majority ofexpense our products in U.S. dollarsresearch and pay for our material components in Japanese yen, U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars, and Chinese renminbi. We pay labordevelopment costs and overhead expenses in Chinese renminbi, the currency of China (the basic unit of which is the yuan), Hong Kong dollars and Japanese yen. The exchange rate of the Hong Kong dollar to the U.S. dollar has been fixed by the Hong Kong government since 1983 at approximately HK$7.80 to US$1.00, through the currency issuing banks in Hong Kong and accordingly has not in the past presented a currency exchange risk. This could change in the future if those in Hong Kong arguing for a floating currency system prevail in the ongoing debate over whether to continue to peg the Hong Kong dollar to the US dollar.

     We believe our most significant foreign exchange risk results from material purchases made in Japanese yen. Approximately 16%, 8% and 16% of our material costs have been in Japanese yen duringas incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003. Sales made in Japanese yen account for less than 11%2004, we incurred research and development expenses of sales forapproximately $2.7 million, $4.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively.

Trend Information

     Currently, our operations consist of three reportable segments, Consumer Electronics and Communication Products, Telecommunication Components Assembly and LCD panels.

     We plan to continue to leverage on our solid customer relationships and to expand our business. During 2004, we were able to expand our product line to higher growth products and we were able to benefit from the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected in the event of a severe increase in production capacity from the valuecommencement of operation of our new factory premises.

     For Consumer Electronics and Communication Products, we will continue to focus on optical devices, educational products, cellular phone accessories and home entertainment products. In 2004, we began delivering new products, like Bluetooth wireless headset accessory for cellular phones and new home entertainment products, in addition to the Eyetoy USB cameras for Playstation 2. Since June 2003, we have been able to diversify our product range from finished products to component assemblies and began manufacturing the high growth CMOS sensor modules for integration into various image capturing devices such as cellular phones with built-in camera functions.

     For Telecom Component Assembly, we will continue to focus on high-growth products which require advance technological production know-how. In addition to high-end color LCD modules, we began manufacturing FPC sub-assemblies in March 2003 for integration into various LCD modules and other products, like infotainment consumer electronic products. We plan to seek opportunities to expand our product line and customer base for these products.

     LCD panels are found in numerous applications in electronics products, such as watches, clocks, calculators, pocket games, PDAs and mobile and cordless telephones. We are a customized LCD panel manufacturer, and we develop each product from design concept all the way to a high quality mass producible product. The LCD panels segment moved to new premises, which are about 670,000 square feet and are twice the size of the Japanese yenold factory premises. This new factory will provide room for future expansion of production capacity.

     It has been our strategy to shift our focus more to the US dollar at a time whenbusiness of key components sub-assembly. The key components sub-assembly business generally accounts for relatively lower gross profit margin business. Nam Tai has been very successful in shifting its focus to key components sub-assembly, which accounted for 59% of our sales made in Japanese yen are insufficient2004. We believe that the strong growth of this business will offset the impact of lower gross profit margins and we can continue to coverachieve strong growth in our material purchases in Japanese yen.overall profits. In the long run, we expect to achieve an overall gross profit margins of around 12%.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangement

     Beginning on December 1, 1996,For the Chinese renminbi became fully convertible underyear of 2004, the current accounts. ThereCompany did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are no restrictions on trade-related foreign exchange receipts and disbursements in China. Capital account foreign exchange receipts and disbursements are subjectreasonably likely to control, and organizations in China are restricted in foreign currency transactions that must take place through designated banks.

     We may elect to hedge our currency exchange risk when we judge such action may be required. In an attempt to lower the costs of expenditures in foreign currencies, we will periodically enter into forward contracts or option contracts to buy or sell foreign currency(ies) against the U.S. dollar through one of our banks. Ashave a result, we may suffer losses resulting from the fluctuation between the buy forward exchange rate and the sell forward exchange rate, or from the price of the option premium.

     At December 31, 2003 we held no optioncurrent or future contracts and duringeffect on the year we did not purchase or sell any commodity or currency options. We are continuing to review our hedging strategy and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer losses in the future as a result of hedging activities.

Foreign Currency Risk

     As of December 31, 2003 we had no open forward contracts or option contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies.

     Cash on hand at December 31, 2003 of $61,827,000 was held in the following currencies.

Equivalent
U.S. Dollar
Holdings

December 31, 2003

Japanese yen2,915,000
United States dollars51,193,000
Hong Kong dollar5,783,000
Chinese renminbi1,935,000
Macao Pataca1,000

Interest Rate Risk

Short-term interest rate risk

     Our interest expenses and income are sensitive toCompany’s financial condition, changes in interest rates. Allfinancial condition, revenues or expenses, results of our cash reserves and short-term borrowings are subject to interest rate changes. Cash on hand of $61.8 million as of December 31, 2003 was invested in short-term interest bearing investments having a maturity of three monthsoperations, liquidity, capital expenditures or less. As such, interest income will fluctuate with changes in short term interest rates. In 2003, we had $788,000 in interest income and $121,000 in interest expense.capital resources.

     As of December 31, 2003, we had utilized approximately $8.3 million of our credit facilities, including $1,879,000 in short-term notes payable resulting in minimal interest rate risk.42

45


Long-term interest rate risk

     As of December 31, 2003, we had $2.8 million in long-term bank borrowing including the current portion of $1.1 million.

     Our long term bank borrowing was obtained in May 2002, has a term of four years and bear interest at a rate of 1.5% over three months LIBOR repayable in 16 quarterly installments of $281,250 beginning August 2002. The initial amount of this term loan was $4.5 million and the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2003 was $2.8 million.

     We obtained a seven-year $15.0 million term loan in the fourth quarter of 2001 with a fixed rate of interest of 5.05% for the first four years and 1% over the SIBOR rate for the last three years. The term loan had an outstanding balance of $12.9 million as of December 31, 2002. We repaid this term loan on January 3, 2003.

     The potential effect of a hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates for 2003 indebtedness would be insignificant to our cash flows and net income.

Item 6.Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Directors and Senior Managers

     Our current directors and senior management, and their ages as of February 29, 200428, 2005, are as follows:

       
Name Age Position with Nam Tai



Tadao Murakami  6061  Chairman of the Board and member of the Board of Directors
Joseph Li  5253  Chief Executive Officer, President
M. K. Koo59 and Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board of Directors
Guy Bindels43Research & Development Director
George Shih47Chief Operating Officer
Karene Wong  4041  Chairman of the Board of Namtai Electronic and Electrical Products Limited and
Guy Bindels44Chief Executive Officer of Namtai Electronic and Electrical Products Limited
Joseph Hsu40Chief Financial Officer of Namtai Electronic and Electrical Products Limited
Chen Yee, William46Managing Director of Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Patinda Lei  3738  Chairman of the Board of Zastron ElectronicPrecision-Tech Limited
Lee Kwok Wai, PatrickBobby Hirasawa  3940Chief Financial Officer of Zastron Precision-Tech Limited
George Shih48  Managing Director of Zastron Electronic
L. P. Wang47Assistant Managing Director of Zastron Electronic
Chen Yee, William45Managing Director of Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen)
Kazuhiro Asano52Managing Director of Namtek Software Co., Ltd.
Seitaro Furukawa  6263  Chairman of the Board of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited
Ivan Chui  4546Chief Executive Officer of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited
Colin Yeoh40Chief Financial Officer of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited
Lap Kei Yuen40  Managing Director of J.I.C. Enterprises (HK) LimitedJetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Charles ChuKazuhiro Asano  4753Chairman of the Board of Namtek Software Development Company Limited
M. K. Koo60  Member of the Board of Directors
Peter R. Kellogg  6162  Member of the Board of Directors
Stephen Seung  5758  Member of the Board of Directors and Secretary
Dr. Wing Yan
(William) Lo
  4344Member of the Board of Directors
Charles Chu48  Member of the Board of Directors
Mark Waslen  4344  Member of the Board of Directors

     Tadao Murakami.Mr. Murakami has served Nam Tai in various executive capacities since 1984. He became our Secretary and a Director in DecemberNovember 1989. Since June 1989, he has been employed as the President of our Hong Kong subsidiary. In July 1994, Mr. Murakami succeeded Mr. Koo as President and, in June 1995, became our Chief Executive Officer until September 1998. Mr. Murakami assumed the position of Vice-Chairman in January 1996, and Chairman from September 1998 until March 1, 2001 and again starting February 1, 2002. He is in charge of our manufacturing and marketing operations.With effect from January 1, 2005, Mr. Murakami studied technology in Japan Electronic Technology College in 1964.became a non-executive director of the Company but maintained his role as Chairman of the Board.

     Joseph Li.Mr. Li, co-founder of the J.I.C. Group, has served in various senior executive positions since we acquired the J.I.C. Group in October 2000. Mr. Li assumed the position of Chief Executive Officer in May 2002. Mr. Li has directed J.I.C. Group’s business development since founding J.I.C. Groupgroup in 1980. Mr. Li resigned as a member of the Board of Directors in July 2003.

M.K. Koo.Mr. Koo has served as Chairman In April 2004, he resumed position of the Board of Nam Tai and its predecessor companies from inception until September 1998. He then became our Senior Executive Officer, responsible for corporate strategy, finance and administration and also serves as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. In addition to his current roles as Chief Financial Officer of J.I.C. Technology Company Limited. In January 2005, he resigned from the position of Chief Financial Officer of J.I.C. and a director, he remains responsible for mergers and acquisitions, and administrative matters. Mr. Koo received his Bachelor’sassumed the position of Laws degree from National Taiwan University in 1970.

46


Guy Bindels.Mr. Bindels took up the post of Research and Development Director of Nam Tai Group in March 2003. He is responsible for the research and development activitiesChief Financial Officer of the group. He has worked with the research and development unit of Alcatel for 19 years before joining Nam Tai. He obtained a Master’s Degree in Electronics Engineering in June 1983 from the Government Department for National Education in France.Company.

George Shih.Mr. Shih took up the post of Chief Operating Officer of Nam Tai Group in June 2003. He is responsible for ensuring the smooth operation of manufacturing services of the group. Before joining Nam Tai, he had 19 years of experience in electronics manufacturing services in various management roles with Solectron Corporation. Mr. Shih has obtained a Bachelor’s Degree in Materials Science and Engineering from National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan in 1978. In 1980, he also obtained a Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering from University of Texas, USA. He further obtained a Master’s Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of Texas, USA in 1983.

     Karene Wong.Ms. Wong joined us in MarchJune 1989 and was promoted to Managing Director of our subsidiary Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. (Hong Kong) on January 1, 2001 and in September 2003, became the2001. She was further promoted to Chairman of the Board of NamtaiNam Tai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd..& Electrical Products Limited (Cayman Islands) in October 2003. Before joining us, Ms. Wong was Assistant to the Sales Manager at Wright Joint & Co. Ltd. Ms. Wong is responsible for our sales and marketing operations and supporting employee recruitment and training.

     Patinda Lei.Guy Bindels.Ms. Lei assumedMr. Bindels joined the position of Managing Director of our subsidiary Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited since June 2002 and in September 2003, became the Chairman of the Board of Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. Ms. Lei has worked with Nam Tai Group for eight years specializingas Research and Development Director in promoting, generatingMarch 2003 and monitoring sales revenues on various high-end electronics products. Ms. Lei graduated from the Science Universitybecame a director of TokyoNam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited in 1990, majoring in Industrial Engineering.

Lee Kwok Wai, Patrick. Mr. Lee took up the postMarch 2004. He was promoted to Chief Executive Officer of Managing Director of Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. in February 2004. HeNam Tai Elecrtronic & Electrical Products Limited since July 2004 and is responsible for managing the overall operationresearch and development activities of Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.the group. Before joining Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.,the Nam Tai Group, he has worked for Nokia for 10 years covering engineering, manufacturing operation and general management. His first career after graduation was of Technophone where he started his engineering career. He had worked with Technophonethe research and development unit of Alcatel for four19 years. He graduated from “Ecole Nationale d’ Ingenieur de Brest” (Engineering School located in Brest) in France in 1983.

Joseph Hsu. Mr. Hsu is the Chief Financial Officer of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited. He joined the Nam Tai Group in February 2004 and has nearly 11 years before itof investment banking experience. Mr. Hsu worked in the corporate finance division of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited from 1992 to 2003, where his last position was acquired by Nokia. He obtained hisCorporate Finance Director. Mr. Hsu is a qualified accountant and is an Associate Member of the Hong Kong Society of Accountants and an Associate Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Mr. Hsu graduated with a Bachelor’s Degree in ElectricalEconomics and Electronic EngineeringAccounting from Leeds University, UK and an MSc degree in Management Science from the Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of Surrey, England in 1989 and a Master’s Degree in Advanced Manufacturing Systems from Brunel University, England in 1997.London, UK.

L.P. Wang.Mr. Wang assumed the position of Managing Director of our subsidiary Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. from August 2002 to February 2004. Mr. Wang has since resumed the position of Assistant Managing Director of Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. He has more than 23 years of experience in the electronics industry. He joined Nam Tai in 1997 as production engineering manager and was promoted to vice managing director in 2002. He was further promoted to Managing Director of Zastron Electronics (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. in August of the same year. Prior to joining Nam Tai, Mr. Wang held several management positions in various companies in Taiwan and China. Mr. Wang graduated from Chinese Military Academy in Taiwan.

     Chen Yee, William.Mr. Chen assumed the post of Managing Director of Nam Tai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in September 2003. Before joining Nam Tai, he had 15 years of experience in plant and production management with Jabil Circuits (China) Limited, Dongguan Nokia Mobile Phones Limited, China and Marine Engine Rebuilders, Inc., Philippines. He obtained a Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial Psychology from Far Eastern University in Philippines in 1982 and a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from University of Southern Queensland, Australia in 1999.

43


Patinda Lei.Ms. Lei joined Nam Tai Group in May 1990. In June 2002, she assumed the position of Managing Director of our subsidiary Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited and in September 2003, became the Chairman of the Board of Zastron Precision-Tech Limited. Ms. Lei has worked with Nam Tai Group for fourteen years specializing in promoting, generating and monitoring sales revenues on various high-end electronics products. Ms. Lei graduated from the Faculty of Engineering of Tokyo University of Science in Japan with a degree in management science.

Bobby Hirasawa. Mr. Hirasawa is the Chief Financial Officer of Zastron Precision-Tech Limited. He joined Nam Tai Group in July 2004 and has more than 15 years of experience in the financial industry. He has previously worked at Nomura International (HK) Limited, Jardine Fleming Securities, SG Securities and Kokusai Securities. He has worked in Tokyo, Shanghai and Hong Kong. He graduated from Meiji Gakuin University in Japan.

George Shih.Mr. Shih took up the post of Chief Operating Officer of the Nam Tai Group when he joined us in June 2003 and was transferred to assume the position of Managing Director of Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in May 2004. Before joining Nam Tai, he had 20 years of experience in electronics manufacturing services in various management roles with Solectron Corporation. Mr. Shih has obtained a Bachelor’s Degree in Materials Science and Engineering from National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan in 1978. In 1980, he also obtained a Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering from University of Texas, USA in 1980. He further obtained a Master’s Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from University of Texas, USA in 1983.

Seitaro Furukawa.Mr. Furukawa assumed the position of Chairman of the Board of our subsidiary J.I.C. Technology Company Limited in March 2002. He has extensive experience in international operational management. He held management positions in the Japan offices of General Electric, Admiral International Company and Thompson CSF. After joining the J.I.C. Group in 1992 as a Managing Director, he assumed responsibility for production management and monitoring daily operations of the LCD plant in Shenzhen. Mr. Furukawa received his Bachelor’s of English Literature degree from Aoyama University in 1965 and his Bachelor’s of Technology and Metallurgy degree from Kogakuin University in 1967.

Ivan Chui.Mr. Chui is the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary J.I.C. Technology Company Limited. Mr. Chui has directed J.I.C. Group’s marketing activities since founding J.I.C. Group in 1980. He has over 20 years of experience in the LCD business and has extensive experience in doing business with Japanese companies.

Colin Yeoh.Mr. Yeoh joined J.I.C. Group in September 2003 and assumed the post of Managing Director of Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. in October 2004. In January 2005, he assumed the position of Chief Financial Officer of the J.I.C. Group. Before joining the J.I.C. Group, he worked for Varitronix, a customised LCD manaufacturer, from 1994 to 2003, in the field of operations. Prior to Varitronix, he worked in GEC Marconi Hirst Research (UK) from 1990 to 1994, in the field of optical and display system research. Mr. Yeoh was awarded a PhD in Liquid Crystal Devices in 1990 at Imperial College (London, UK), Master of Science in Microwaves and Modern Optics in 1986 from University College London (UK) and Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from University College London (UK).

Lap Kei Yuen.Mr. Yuen is currently the Managing Director of Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. He joined the J.I.C. Group in 1986. Prior to J.I.C., he served as a Production Manager in Slexs Watch Co., Ltd. from 1984 to 1986. With his excellent performance, he was appointed as the representative to study LC Injection technology in Japan in 1994 and has been a Vice Managing Director of Jetup since 2000. He has 20 years of experience in the LCD industry. While in charge of Jetup’s operations, he successfully established the LCD front process, middle process and rear process production lines. He became the Managing Director of Jetup on January 1, 2005.

     Kazuhiro Asano.Mr. Asano assumed the position of Managing DirectorChairman of the Board of our subsidiary Namtek Software Development Co. Ltd.Company Limited in June 2002. Mr. Asano joined Nam Tai in 1995 as a general manager and was promoted to Managing Director of Shenzhen Namtek Company Limited in 1997. In his current position, he is responsible for the overall corporate management and business development for our software business. Prior to joining Nam Tai, Mr. Asano was the general manager of Seiko Instruments Inc., a private Japanese consumer electronics company, and was responsible for its electronic dictionary division. Mr. Asano graduated from Tsuyama Government Industrial College, Japan with a degree in electrical engineering in 1972.

     Seitaro Furukawa.M.K. Koo.Mr. Furukawa assumed the position ofKoo has served as Chairman of the Board of Nam Tai and Managing Directorits predecessor companies from inception until September 1998. He then became our Senior Executive Officer, responsible for corporate strategy, finance and administration and also served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Koo has resigned from the position of our subsidiary J.I.C. Technology Company Limited in March 2002. He has extensive experience in international operational management. He held

47


management positions in the Japan offices of General Electric, Admiral International Company and Thompson CSF. After joining the J.I.C. Group in 1992Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2005 but maintained his role as a Managing Director, he assumed responsibility for production management and monitoring daily operationsnon-executive director of the LCD plant in Shenzhen.Company. Mr. Furukawa received his Bachelor’s of English Literature degree from Aoyama University in 1965 and his Bachelor’s of Technology and Metallurgy degree from Kogakuin University in 1967.

Ivan Chui.Mr. Chui is the co-founder and Managing Director of our subsidiary J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Ltd. Mr. Chui has directed J.I.C. Group’s marketing activities since founding J.I.C. Group in 1980.

Charles Chu.Mr. Chu originally served as a Director from November 1987 to September 1989. He was reappointed a Director in November 1992. Since July 1988, Mr. Chu has been engaged in the private practice of law in Hong Kong. Mr. Chu serves on our audit committee. Mr. ChuKoo received his Bachelor’s of Laws degree and Post-Graduate Certificate of Laws from theNational Taiwan University of Hong Kong in 1980 and 1981, respectively.1970.

     Peter R. Kellogg.Mr. Kellogg was elected to our Board of Directors in June 2000. Mr. Kellogg was a Senior Managing Director of Spear, Leeds & Kellogg, a registered broker-dealer in the United States and a specialist firm on the New York Stock Exchange until the firm merged with Goldman Sachs in 2000 when Mr. Kellogg became a Senior Advisory Director.2000. Mr. Kellogg served on our audit committeeAudit Committee until July 8, 2003. He currently serves on our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Kellogg is also a member of the Board of the Ziegler Companies.

44


     Stephen Seung.Mr. Seung was appointed a Directordirector of Nam Tai in 1995. Mr. Seung is an attorney and a C.P.A. and has been engaged in the private practice of law in New York since 1981. Mr. Seung received a B.S. degree in Engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1969, an M.S. degree in Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley in 1971, an MBA degree from New York University in 1973 and a J.D. degree from New York Law School in 1979. Mr. Seung acts as our authorized agent in the United States and servesStates. He served on our audit committeeAudit Committee until October 2003. With effect from October 15, 2003, Mr. Seung also assumed the role of Secretary of the Company.

     Dr. Wing Yan (William) Lo. Dr. Lo was elected to our Board of Directors at our annual meeting of shareholders on July 8, 2003. Dr. Lo is currently the Executive Director and Vice President of China Unicom Ltd., a telecommunications operator in China that is listed on both the Hong Kong and New York Stock Exchanges. Dr. Lo is currently also the non-executive Chairman of WPP Greater China, a division of WPP Group plc., a communications services group having its shares listed on both the London Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq National Market. From 1998 to 1999, Dr. Lo was the chief executive appointment at Citibank.officer of Citibank’s Global Consumer Banking business for Hong Kong. Dr. Lo was the founding Managing Director of Hongkong Telecom IMS Ltd. Dr. Lo holds an M. Phil. degree in molecular pharmacology and a Ph.D. degree in genetic engineering, both from Cambridge University, England. He is also memberan Adjunct Professor of the BoardThe School of theBusiness, Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute andBaptist University as well as a Governor of a newly established independent school, the Hong Kong Jockey Club Institute of Chinese Exchange.ISF Academy. In 1998, Dr. Lo was appointed as a Justice of the Peace of Hong Kong. In 2003, he was appointed as Committee Member of Shantou People’s Political Consultative Conference. Dr. Lo currently serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee acting as the Chairman and also serves on our audit committee.Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.

Charles Chu.Mr. Chu originally served as a Director from November 1987 to September 1989. He was reappointed a Director in November 1992. Since July 1988, Mr. Chu has been engaged in the private practice of law in Hong Kong. Mr. Chu serves on the Compensation Committee acting as Chairman. He also serves on our Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Chu received his Bachelor’s of Laws degree and Post-Graduate Certificate of Law from the University of Hong Kong in 1980 and 1981, respectively.

Mark Waslen. Mr. Waslen was elected toappointed a director of Nam Tai at our Boardannual meeting of Directors inshareholders on July 8, 2003 and currently serves on the audit committeeAudit Committee acting as Chairman. He also serves on our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Previously, Mr. Waslen was employed with Nam Tai during the periods from 1990 to 1995 and from June 1998 to October 1999 in various capacities, including Financial Controller, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Waslen has been employed with various accounting firms, including Peat Marwick Thorne, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and is currently employed with BME + Partners Chartered Accountants. Mr. Waslen is a C.F.A., C.A. and a C.P.A. and received a Bachelor’s of Commerce (Accounting Major) from the University of Saskatchewan in 1982.

     No family relationship exists among any of the named directors, executive officers or key employees. No arrangement or understanding exists between any of our directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or executive officer was elected as a director or executive officer of Nam Tai. Directors are elected each year at our annual meeting of shareholders and serve until their successors take office or until their death, resignation or removal. Executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

Compensation of Directors and Senior Managers

     The aggregate compensation we and our subsidiaries paid during the year ended December 31, 20032004 to all directors and officers as a group for services in all capacities was approximately $2.74$4.2 million, including compensation in the form of housing in Hong Kong for our Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, and President and our Chief Financial Officer.

48


     Directors who are not employees of Nam Tai nor any of its subsidiaries are paid $3,000 per month for services as a director, $750 per meeting attended in person and $500 per meeting attended by telephone. In addition, they are reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their services as a director.

     Members of our key staff are eligible for annual cash bonuses based on their performance and that of the division in which they are assigned for the relevant period. Key staff members of a division will be entitled to share up to 15% of the operating income from that division during the year. Our executive officers in charge of the business unit recommend the participating staff members and the amount, if any, to be allocated from the division’s profit pool to an eligible individual.

     According to the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC,China, we are required to contribute 8% to 9% of the stipulated salary set by the local government of Shenzhen, the PRC,China, to the retirement benefit schemes to fund the retirement benefits of our employees. Our principal obligation with respect to these retirement benefit schemes is to make the required contributions under the scheme. No forfeited contributions may be used by us to reduce the existing level of contributions.

45


     Prior to December 2000, we maintained staff contributory retirement plans (defined contribution pension plans), which covered certain of our employees in Hong Kong. From December 2000 onwards, we terminated our existing staff contributory retirement plans and enrolled all of our eligible employees in Hong Kong into a Mandatory Provident Fund, or MPF, program. In August 2003, we set up our PRC headquarters,first subsidiary, Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited, in Macao, China. We enrolled all of our eligible employees in Macao into a retirement benefit scheme, or RBS. Both the MPF and RBS are available to all employees aged 18 to 64 and with at least 60 days of service under the employment of Nam Tai in Hong Kong and Macao. Contributions are made by us at 5% based on the staff’s relevant income. The maximum relevant income for contribution purpose per employee is $3$3,000 per month. Staff members are entitled to 100% of the Company’s contributions, together with accrued returns, irrespective of their length of service with us, but the benefits are required by law to be preserved until the retirement age of 65 for employees in Hong Kong while the benefit can be withdrawn by the employees in Macao at the end of employment contracts.

     The cost of our contribution to the staff retirement plans in Hong Kong, Macao and PRCChina amounted to $561,000, $617,000, $982,000 and $982,000$1,363,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, respectively.

     In August 1990, we fixed compensation for loss of office at $500,000 for Mr. M.K. Koo and $300,000 for Mr. Tadao Murakami. We also fixed the age of retirement for directors, including Messrs. Koo and Murakami, at age 65 years. We have accrued the entire $800,000 on account of this compensation for loss of office.office, which was paid out in 2005.

Board Practices

     All directors hold office until our next annual meeting of shareholders, which generally is in June of each calendar year, or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or their positions are earlier vacated by resignation or otherwise. All executive officers are appointed by the Board and serve at the pleasure of the Board. There are no director service contracts providing for benefits upon termination of employment. Our Board of Directors has determined,decided, effective December 31, 2002, to grant future options under our stock option plansplan only to our outside, non-employee directors. However, in July 2004, our Board of Directors decided to resume granting options to management and key staff members as incentive based on their performance.

Corporate Governance Guideline

     We have adopted a set of corporate governance guidelines, which are available on our website athttp://www.namtai.com/ corpgov/corpgov.htm. The contents of this website address, other than the corporate governance guidelines, the code of ethics and committee charters, are not a part of this Form 20-F. Stockholders also may request a free copy of our corporate governance guidelines in print form from:

Pan Pacific I.R. Ltd.
Attention: Investor Relations Office
Suite 1790 - 999 W. Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6C 2W2
Toll Free Telephone: 1-800-661-8831

Committee Charters

     The charters for our audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee are available on our website athttp://www.namtai.com/corpgov/corpgov.htm. The contents of this website address, other than the corporate governance guidelines, the code of ethics and committee charteres, are not a part of this Form 20-F. Stockholders may request a copy of each of these charters from the address and phone number set forth above under “—Corporate Governance Guideline.”

Audit Committee

     Nam Tai has established an audit committee whose primary duties consist of reviewing, acting on and reporting to the Board of Directors with respect to various auditing and accounting matters, including the selection of auditors, the scope of the annual audits and the fees to be paid to the auditors and the performance of the independent auditors and accounting practices. The audit committee currently consists of three independent non-executive directors, Messrs. Waslen, Chu and Lo. Mr. Waslen, who was elected by the full Board of Directors, currently acts as the Chairman of the Audit Committeeaudit committee.

Meetings46

          Meetings of


     In November 2003, the SEC approved the final NYSE corporate governance guidelines. Pursuant to NYSE Section 303A, three committees, namely the audit committee, nominating and corporate governance committee and compensation committee, are to be set up by all domestic filers and should be composed entirely of independent directors. For purposes of keeping with the best practice, Nam Tai established the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee on July 30, 2004. The composition and primary duties of these committees are set forth as chairedbelow.

     Pursuant to the requirements of NYSE Section 303A.11, the Company has evaluated its corporate governance standards in light of the corporate governance standards required of domestic companies under NYSE standards. Based on this evaluation, the Company has determined that there are no significant ways in which its corporate governance standards differ from those required of domestic companies by the ChairmanNYSE.

Compensation Committee

     Nam Tai has established a compensation committee whose primary duties consist of Audit Committee, shall be held at least once per quarter with externalevaluating and internal auditors.

Authority and Duties

          The audit committee shall assistmaking recommendations to the Board of Directors in fulfilling is “oversight and monitoring” responsibilities.

          The dutiesregarding the compensation of the auditCompany’s directors and equity-based and incentive compensation programs of the Company. The compensation committee are to:currently consists of four independent non-executive directors, Messrs. Chu, Lo, Waslen and Kellogg. Mr. Chu, who was elected by the full Board of Directors, currently acts as the Chairman of the compensation committee.

review the financial reports and other financial information provided by the Company to any governmental body or the public;
review the Company’s system of internal controls regarding financial, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management and the Board have established;
review the Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally;

49


review and approve all related-party transactions on an on-going basis for the review of potential conflict of interest situations where appropriate;
review the independence, qualification and performance of independent auditor and internal audit function;
prepare an audit committee report as required by the SEC to be included in the company’s annual proxy statement;
review and reassess the adequacy of the AuditNominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter on an annual basis;
authorize investigations into any matters within the Committee’s scope of responsibilities; and
perform such other functions as assigned by law or the Board.

     The auditNam Tai established a nominating and corporate governance committee last met on February 5, 2004.

     The Compensation CommitteeJuly 30, 2004, whose primary duties consist of identifying and recommending to the Board of Directors determinesindividuals qualified to become Board members and developing and recommending to the salariesBoard and incentive compensationadministering the corporate governance guidelines of the officers of Nam Tai (other than Messrs. MurakamiCompany.

     The nominating and Koo, whose salaries are decided each year by our Board’s outside directors), provides recommendations for the salaries and incentive compensation of all employees and consultants and administers various compensation, stock and benefit plans of Nam Tai. The Compensation Committeecorporate governance committee currently consists of four independent non-executive directors, Messrs. MurakamiLo, Chu, Waslen and Koo.

     The Investment Committee ofKellogg. Dr. Lo, who was elected by the full Board of Directors, may make strategic investments in companies of amounts less than $5 million with approval of other memberscurrently acts as the Chairman of the Board. The Investment Committee consists of Messrs. Murakaminominating and Koo.corporate governance committee.

Options of Directors and Senior Management

     The following table provides information concerning the options owned by our current Directors and Senior Management at March 1, 2004.as of February 28, 2005. All share numbers subject to options and exercise price per share have been adjusted to give effect to a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003 and a ten-for-one stock dividend effective on November 7, 2003.

             
  Number of        
  common shares Exercise    
  subject to Price ($) Expiration
Name options per share Date

 
 
 
Tadao Murakami         
Joseph Li         
M. K. Koo         
Guy Bindels         
George Shih         
Karene Wong         
Patinda Lei         
Lee Kwok Wai, Patrick         
L. P. Wang         
Chen Yee, William         
Kazuhiro Asano         
Seitaro Furukawa         
Ivan Chui         
Charles Chu  16,500   16.8182   7/8/2006 
Peter R. Kellogg  16,500   4.3945   6/22/2004 
   16,500   6.0155   4/30/2005 
   16,500   16.8182   7/8/2006 
Stephen Seung  16,500   16.8182   7/8/2006 
Wing Yan (William) Lo  16,500   16.8182   7/8/2006 
Mark Waslen         
             
  Number of       
  common shares  Exercise    
  subject to  Price ($)  Expiration 
Name options  per share  Date 
Tadao Murakami  180,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
   350,000   20.84   2/4/2007 
Joseph Li  30,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
   50,000   20.84   2/4/2007 
Karene Wong         
Guy Bindels         
Joseph Hsu         
Chen Yee, William         
Patinda Lei         
Bobby Hirasawa         
George Shih         
Seitaro Furukawa         
Ivan Chui         
Colin Yeoh         
Lap Kei Yuen         
Kazuhiro Asano         
M.K. Koo  180,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
   350,000   20.84   2/4/2007 
Charles Chu  16,500   16.82   7/8/2006 
   15,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
Peter R. Kellogg  16,500   6.02   4/30/2005 
   16,500   16.82   7/8/2006 
   15,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
Stephen Seung  16,500   16.82   7/8/2006 
   15,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
Wing Yan (William) Lo  16,500   16.82   7/8/2006 
   15,000   19.40   7/30/2006 
Mark Waslen  15,000   19.40   7/30/2006 

47


     Please refer to page 5249 of this Report, which sets forth the shareholding information of each of the director and senior management of the Company.

50


Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan

     Our 1993 andIn July 2004, our Board of Directors has decided to resume granting stock options under our 2001 stock option plans provideplan,which provides for the grant of stock options to directors, employees (including officers), and consultants. ThePursuant to the amended 2001 stock option plan, the terms and conditions of individual grants may vary subject to the following: (i) the exercise price of incentive stock options may not normally be less than market value on the date of grant; (ii) the term of incentive stock options may not exceed ten years from the date of grant; (iii) the exercise price of an option cannot be altered once granted; and (iv) every non-executivenon-employee director who is not our employee shall, on an annual basis upon their election to the Board of Director at the Annual General Meeting, be automatically granted 16,50015,000 options, with an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant. At March 1, 2004,February 28, 2005, options to purchase 108,5501,737,050 shares were outstanding under our Stock Options Plansamended 2001 stock option plan and 1,904,869259,869 shares were available for future grant under them. The full text of our amended 2001 stock option plan, amended on July 30, 2004, we hereby file as Exhibit 4.18 with this Annual Report on Form 20-F for 2004.

     Our Board of Directors has determined,decided, effective December 31, 2002, to grant future options under our stock option plans only to our non-employee directors. However, our Board of Directors decided to resume granting options to management and key staff members as incentive based on their performance in July 2004. Thereafter, incentive compensation paid to management and other key employees was in the form of either cash bonuses and/or stock options.

Employees

     As of December 31, 2004, we employed 5,636 persons on a full-time basis, of which 5,574 were employed in China, 49 were employed in Hong Kong, 10 were employed in Macao, 2 were employed in Japan and 1 was employed in the British Virgin Islands. Of these employees, approximately 4,131 were engaged in manufacturing, approximately 1505 were engaged in administrative, research and development, quality control, engineering and marketing positions, and the balance in supporting jobs such as security, janitorial, food and medical services.

     As of December 31, 2003, we employed 4,476 persons on a full-time basis, of which 4,385 were employed in China, 62 were employed in Hong Kong, 24 were employed in Macao, 4 were employed in Japan and 1 was employed in the British Virgin Islands. Of these employees, approximately 3,415 were engaged in manufacturing, approximately 1,061 were engaged in administrative, research and development, quality control, engineering and marketing positions, and the balance in supporting jobs such as security, janitorial, food and medical services.

     As of December 31, 2002, we employed 4,246 persons on a full-time basis, of which 4,173 were employed in China and 73 were employed in Hong Kong. Of these employees, approximately 2,915 were engaged in manufacturing, approximately 1,331 were engaged in administrative, research and development, quality control, engineering and marketing positions, and the balance in supporting jobs such as security, janitorial, food and medical services.

     As of December 31, 2001, we employed 3,947 persons on a full-time basis, of which 3,866 were employed in China and 81 were employed in Hong Kong. Of these employees, approximately 2,728 were engaged in manufacturing, approximately 1,096 were engaged in administrative, research and development, quality control, engineering and marketing positions, and the balance in supporting jobs such as security, janitorial, food and medical services.

We are not a party to any material labor contracts. The nature of our arrangement with our manufacturing employees is such that we can increase or reduce staffing levels without significant difficulty, cost or penalty. Although we have experienced no significant labor stoppages and believe relations with our employees are satisfactory, this situation may not continue in the future, and any labor difficulties could lead to increased costs and/or interruptions in our production.

     It is the practice of one of our subsidiaries to enter into a collective agreement with its trade union. The collective agreement usually sets out the minimum standard for the wages, working hours and other benefits of the workers. The current collective agreement between our subsidiary and its trade union expires on April 17, 2004December 31, 2005 and will be renewed.

Item 7.Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

     The following table sets forth certain information known to us regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares as of March 1, 2004,February 28, 2005, by:

•   each person (or group within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of our common shares; and

•   each of our current directors and senior management.

48


each of our current directors and senior management.

     We are not directly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any foreign government, natural or legal person.

51


         
  Shares beneficially(1) owned
  
Name Number Percent

 
 
M. K. Koo  5,316,386   12.9 
Peter R. Kellogg  5,246,680(2)  12.7 
I.A.T. Reinsurance Syndicate Ltd  4,676,100(2)  11.3 
Li & Chui Holdings (B.V.I.) Ltd.  2,935,087   7.1 
Joseph Li  3,013,957(3)  7.3 
Ivan Chui  2,980,957(4)  7.2 
Tadao Murakami  1,849,225   4.5 
Guy Bindels      
George Shih      
Karene Wong  34,100   * 
Patinda Lei  26,400   * 
Lee Kwok Wai, Patrick  935   * 
L. P. Wang  600(5)  * 
Chen Yee, William      
Kazuhiro Asano      
Seitaro Furukawa      
Charles Chu  69,000(6)  * 
Stephen Seung  69,800(7)  * 
Wing Yan (William) Lo  16,500(8)  * 
Mark Waslen  10,000   * 
         
  Shares beneficially(1) owned   
Name Number(12) Percent 
M. K. Koo  6,975,786(2)  16.2 
Peter R. Kellogg  5,679,680(3)  13.3 
I.A.T. Reinsurance Syndicate Ltd.  5,108,300(3)  12.0 
Li & Chui Holdings (B.V.I.) Ltd.  2,935,087   6.9 
Joseph Li  3,093,957(4)  7.2 
Ivan Chui  2,980,957(5)  7.0 
Tadao Murakami  2,379,225(6)  5.5 
Karene Wong  39,100   * 
Guy Bindels  1,000   * 
Joseph Hsu  2,000   * 
Chen Yee, William      
Patinda Lei  25,300   * 
Bobby Hirasawa  3,000   * 
George Shih      
Seitaro Furukawa      
Colin Yeoh      
Lap Kei Yuen  1,800   * 
Kazuhiro Asano      
Charles Chu  84,000(7)  * 
Stephen Seung  84,800(8)  * 
Wing Yan (William) Lo  31,500(9)  * 
Mark Waslen  25,000(10)  * 


*  Less than 1%.
 
(1)  Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, shares of common shares that an individual or group has a right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to the exercise of options are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such individual or group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person shown in the table. Percentage of ownership is based on 41,231,27242,664,536 common shares outstanding as of March 1, 2004.February 28, 2005.
 
(2)Mr. Kellogg holds directly 521,080 common shares andIncludes options to purchase 49,500530,000 common shares exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2004.February 28, 2005.
(3)  Mr. Kellogg holds directly 523,380 common shares and options to purchase 48,000 common shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2005. Indirectly, through I.A.T. Reinsurance Syndicate Ltd., Mr. Kellogg holds 4,676,1005,108,300 common shares. I.A.T. Reinsurance Syndicate Ltd. is a Bermuda corporation of which Mr. Kellogg is the sole holder of voting stock. Mr. Kellogg disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
(3)(4)  Includes shares held of record by Li & Chui Holdings (B.V.I.) Limited for which Mr. Li shares investment and voting control with Mr. Chui. These are the same shares shown in the table for Ivan Chui. Also, includes options to purchase 80,000 common shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2005.
 
(4)(5)  Includes shares held of record by Li & Chui Holdings (B.V.I.) Limited for which Mr. Chui shares investment and voting control with Mr. Li. These are the same shares shown in the table for Joseph Li.
 
(5)Includes 600 common shares that are registered to Tsai Sue Wan, Jean, Mr. Wang’s wife, as to which Mr. Wang disclaims beneficial ownership.
(6)  Includes options to purchase 16,500530,000 common shares exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2004.February 28, 2005
 
(7)  Includes options to purchase 16,50031,500 common shares exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2004,February 28, 2005.
(8)  Includes options to purchase 31,500 common shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2005, and 20,300 common shares that are registered to Violet Seung, Mr. Seung’s wife, as to which Mr. Seung disclaims beneficial ownership.
 
(8)(9)  Consists of options to purchase common shares exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2004.February 28, 2005.
 
(9)(10)  Includes options to purchase 15,000 common shares exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2005.
(11)  All the share numbers have been adjusted to give effect to a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003 and a ten-for-one stock dividend effective on November 7, 2003.
(12)  These share numbers include options owned by these individuals and assume that these options will be exercised.

     All of the holders of our common shares have equal voting rights with respect to the number of common shares held. As of March 1, 2004,February 28, 2005, there were approximately 808766 holders of record of our common shares. According to information supplied by our transfer agent, 774733 holders of

49


record with addresses in the United States held 30,822,02629,642,848 of our outstanding common shares.

52


     The following table reflects the percentage ownership of our common shares beneficially owned by our major shareholders during the past three years:

             
  Percentage Ownership(1)
  
  February 28, March 31, March 1,
  2002 2003 2004
  
 
 
M. K. Koo  29.2   18.9   12.9 
Peter R. Kellogg  14.2   12.2   12.7 
I.A.T. Reinsurance Syndicate Ltd  12.7   10.7   11.3 
Li & Chui Holdings (B.V.I.) Ltd.  10.6   8.7   7.1 
Joseph Li  10.6   9.1   7.3 
Ivan Chui  10.6   9.0   7.2 
Tadao Murakami  8.9   6.0   4.5 
             
      Percentage Ownership(1)   
  March 31, March 1, February 28,
  2003 2004 2005
M. K. Koo  18.9   12.9   16.2 
Peter R. Kellogg  12.2   12.7   13.3 
I.A.T. Reinsurance Syndicate Ltd.  10.7   11.3   12.0 
Li & Chui Holdings (B.V.I.) Ltd.  8.7   7.1   6.9 
Joseph Li  9.1   7.3   7.2 
Ivan Chui  9.0   7.2   7.0 
Tadao Murakami  6.0   4.5   5.5 


(1)  Based on 30,779,820, 36,392,004, 41,231,272 and 41,231,27242,664,536 common shares outstanding on February 28, 2002, March 31, 2003, and March 1, 2004 and February 28, 2005, respectively.

There are no arrangements that may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of the Company.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

     In January 2003, we invested $10.0 million for a 25% equity interest in Alpha Star Investments Ltd., the ultimate parent of JCT. JCT is engaged in the design, development and marketing of wireless communication terminals and wireless application software. In connection with our investment, Mr. Koo has beenwas appointed as a director to Alpha Star Investment Ltd’sLtd.’s Board of Directors. Mr. Koo resigned from the Board of Directors of Alpha Star Investment Ltd. on July 12, 2004. We are manufacturingcurrently manufacture wireless communication terminals and related modules for JCT. As part of our investment, Alpha Star Investment LtdLtd. agreed to have us manufacture the RF modules for at least 50 percent of the orders it, or any of its subsidiaries, receives for RF modules provided we perform such manufacturing services at a price comparable to the market. In March 2003, we agreed to support JCT in the production of 1 million cellular phones by providing assembling services and support for the manufacturing of LCD modules and RF modules. As of December 31, 2003,2004, we were owed $2.7 million$66,000 from JCT. For the year ended December 31, 2003,2004, we recognized net sales of $20.8$34.2 million to JCT and purchased raw materials of approximately $5.5$12.4 million from JCT and its related companies.

     On February 16, 2004, by unanimous consent following resolutions without meeting, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution for the sale of a residential property located in Hong Kong by a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Nam Tai Group Management Limited or NTGM, to Mr. Tadao Murakami, Chairman of the Board of Directors, for consideration of approximately $1.8 million, which is similarclose to the original acquired cost and appraised market value of the property as of January 31, 2004. The agreement for the sale of the property was entered into between Nam Tai Group Management Limited and Mr. Tadao Murakami on March 10, 2004.

     On December 10, 2004, by unanimous consent, the Board of Directors of Nam Tai Group Management Limited, adopted a resolution for assigning the beneficial interest of Nam Tai Group Management Limited in 10 units of debentures of nominal value of approximately $1,603 each, issued by The Clearwater Bay Golf & Country Club to Mr. Koo at the consideration of approximately $231,000, which represented the book value of the debentures in the financial statements of Nam Tai Group Management Limited. An agreement was entered between Nam Tai Group Management Limited and Mr. Koo on December 10, 2004.

Item 8.Financial Information

Financial Statements

     OurThe Consolidated Financial Statements are set forth under Item 18. Financial Statements.have been appended to this Form 20-F (see pages F-1 to F-36). From year endyear-end dated December 31, 20032004 to our reporting date of March 5, 20044, 2005, there has been no significant changes on our consolidated Financial Statements, except subsequent events as shown under the Financial Statement.Statements.

Change in Public Accountants

     In May of 2002, upon consideration and to reduce our professional fees, our Board of Directors, including our Audit Committee, recommended that HLB Hodgson Impey Cheng replace Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu as our independent auditors. This change was included in our proxy statement and approved by our shareholders at our annual meeting on June 14, 2002. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu did not resign or refuse to stand for re-election, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu’s reports on the financial statements for either of the two years prior to the change and included in this Report contained an adverse opinion, disclaimer, modification or qualification.

5350


     In November 2002, HLB advised us that they could not meet our audit requirements for the agreed fees and on a cost-effective basis because the increasingly complex regulatory guidelines for the auditing of public companies would require them to perform a significant portion of the final audit work with personnel from a U.S. affiliate. HLB submitted their resignation accordingly. There were no disagreements with HLB on any matter or accounting principle, practice, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

     In December 2002, in contemplation of our intention to list on the NYSE, we sought a replacement firm with a strong U.S. and Asian presence and an ability to handle our audit requirements. Accordingly, our Board of Directors appointed Grant Thornton as our independent public accountants based on Grant Thornton’s ranking among accounting firms in the U.S. and our Board’s belief that Grant Thornton would be acceptable to our shareholders. The appointment of Grant Thornton was accepted by our shareholders at our annual meeting held on July 8, 2003. Accordingly, Grant Thornton issued the audited account for 2002.

     In August 2003, we set up the PRC’s headquarters in Macao, China, due to our continuous increase in investment in PRC. Since Grant Thornton does not have an office in Macao and does not have a licence to handle Macao statutory tax filings, Grant Thornton tendered its resignation as our auditors. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, who had been our auditors from 1998-2001, was hired to audit for both 2002 and 2003. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu has been appointed as our auditors as of October 24, 2003. Grant Thornton will, however, continue to provide tax advisory services to us, other than with respect to Macao.

Legal Proceedings

     We are not a party to any legal proceedings other than routine litigation incidental to our business and there are no material legal proceedings pending with respect to our property, other than as described below.

Tele-Art Litigation

     In June 1997, weNam Tai filed a petition in the British Virgin Islands for the winding up of Tele-Art, Inc. on account of an unpaid judgment debt owed to us.Nam Tai. The High Court of Justice granted an order to wind up Tele-Art, Inc. in July 1998 and the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal upheld the decision on January 25, 1999. On January 22, 1999, pursuant to our Articles of Association, we redeemed and cancelled 415,500 (Note 1) shares of Nam Tai registered in the name of Tele-Art, Inc. at a price of $3.73 per share to offset substantially all of the judgment debt of $799,000 plus interest and legal costs totaling approximately $1.7 million, including dividends that we had withheld and credited against the judgment debt.

     Following the completion of the redemption, we received notice that the liquidator had obtained an ex-parte injunction preventing us from redeeming Nam Tai shares beneficially owned by Tele-Art, Inc. On February 4, 1999, the liquidator of Tele-Art, Inc. filed a further summons in the British Virgin Islands on its behalf seeking, among other matters:

   A declaration as to the respective priorities of the debts of Tele-Art, Inc. to the Bank of China, us,Nam Tai, and other creditors and their respective rights to have their debts discharged out of the proceeds of the Tele-Art, Inc.’s Nam Tai shares;

   An order setting aside the redemption of 415,500 (Note 1) shares, and ordering delivery of all shares in our possession or control of to the liquidator; and

   Payment of all dividends in respect of Tele-Art, Inc.’s Nam Tai shares.

     On March 26, 2001, we filed a summons seeking to remove the liquidator for failing to act diligently in the performance of his duties and for knowingly misleading the court. On September 3, 2002, the liquidator submitted a letter of resignation prior to the scheduled removal hearing. A new liquidator was appointed by the BVI court on July 11, 2003.

     On July 5, 2002, upon our application, the court ordered the removal of the liquidator’s ex-parte injunction and ordered an inquiry into damages. Nam Tai filed its amended Points of Claim of Defence on April 16, 2004. There are currently applications before the Court of Appeal in the British Virgin Islands to determine the progress of this matter as Nam Tai has sought to enter judgment against David Hague, the former liquidator, who has applied to strike out Nam Tai’s claim for damages. On August 9, 2002, the court delivered a decision awarding us a judgment against Tele-Art, Inc. for approximately $34.0 million. On August 12, 2002, we redeemed and cancelled, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the remaining 509,181 (Note 2) shares beneficially owned by Tele-Art, Inc. at a price of $6.14 per share. Including the dividends which we had withheld and credited against the judgment, this offset a further $3.5 million, approximately, in judgment debts owed to us by Tele-Art, Inc. We recorded the $3.3 million redemption net of expenses as other income in 2002.

5451


     On January 21, 2003, judgment was delivered on the liquidators’ February 4, 1999 summons declaring that the redemption and set offset-off of dividends on the 415,500 (Note 1) shares be set aside and that all Tele-Art, Inc. property withheld by us be delivered to Tele-Art, Inc. in liquidation. The orders granted in the judgment were substantially different from the relief sought in the February 4, 1999 application. On February 4, 2003, we filed an application for a stay of execution and leave to appeal the decision listing eight grounds of appeal, which was granted on June 23, 2003. The case was heard on January 12, 2004 and the judgment was reserved.delivered on April 26, 2004. It was held that the redemption by Nam Tai of 415,500 (Note 1) Nam Tai’s shares owned by Tele-Art, Inc. was proper, however, Nam Tai must return the redemption proceeds and dividends payable received to the liquidator for distribution to the creditors. David Hague, the former liquidator of Tele-Art, Inc. who filed the original application in 1999, has obtained leave to appeal to the Privy Council, the final appellate court for the British Virgin Islands, that part of the Court of Appeal judgment which upheld the redemption of the Tele Art shares by Nam Tai. It is not expected that this appeal will be heard before 2006. The court also held that Bank of China was a secured creditor but the court did not determine the amount owed by Tele-Art, Inc. to Bank of China. We dispute that finding, and among other matters, have argued that the proof of debt by Bank of China was incomplete and invalid.

     Our legal representatives     Bank of China has submitted that it is a secured creditor. In this respect, the Bank’s position is that as of December 6, 2004, the debt from Tele-Art Limited, a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Tele-Art, Inc. (the loan was also guaranteed by Tele-Art, Inc.) was HK$21,985,970.16 (approximately US$2.8 million) with interest accruing at HK$4,264.7 (or US$547) daily. The liquidator, however, took the view in his third liquidator report which was submitted to the Court on October 13, 2004, that Bank of China’s proof of debt was incomplete. The liquidator has requested the Court’s approval to take further action and demand that Bank of China provide further information for his consideration. Nam Tai is of the view that the amount of debt owed by Tele-Art Limited to Bank of China may not exceed $1.4 million. It should further be noted that apart from Nam Tai, the liquidator admitted the proof of debts of two other unsecured creditors which together amounted to approximately $33,000. David Hague, the former liquidator, has submitted a claim for $381,860 in respect of fees and expenses for work done while acting as liquidator of Tele Art, Inc. These fees however are subject to the approval of the court and as such are still pending as they have advised usnot yet been approved. The Liquidator filed a Summons for the approval of his third report on October 13, 2004 and this was heard on December 14, 2004. The Court inter alia ordered that we have real prospectsthe Liquidator continue the administration of success on appeal against the January 21, 2003 decision and we plan to vigorously fight for such an outcome. However,liquidation of Tele-Art, Inc. substantially in accordance with his proposals contained in said report as well as the second report.

     As of December 31, 2002, due to the uncertainty of the final outcome of the litigation as a result of the January 21, 2003 judgment and in accordance with SFAS No. 5,“Accounting for Contingencies”, we have recorded a provision for $5.2 million as a component of accrued expenses pending a final determination of this matter by the courts as of December 31, 2002,courts. This represented the then bestthen-best estimate of the net monetary expense we would incur if our appeal is unsuccessful and the two judgment debts in the total amount of $38.0 million (including interest, costs, and related expenses) is determined as having the lowest priorities in recovering from the estate of Tele-Art, Inc. As of November 7, 2003, apart from Nam Tai, a total of fourthree other creditors of Tele-Art, Inc., including Bank of China, had submitted their proof of debt to the liquidator. These claims, together with the claim by David Hague, the former liquidator of the Company for the total claim amount ofoutstanding fees and expenses, amounted to approximately $3.4 million. Together withAs a result, the outstanding legal charge as of December 31, 2003, the total potential future obligation to us would only be approximately $3.9 million. The 2002 provision for $5.2 million had beenwas reduced to $3.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2003.

     With the two judgment debts as well as the several costs orders in favour of Nam Tai, Nam Tai is the major unsecured creditor of Tele-Art, Inc. holding approximately 99.9% outstanding debts of Tele-Art, Inc. Pursuant to the judgment of April 26 2004, we are in negotiations with the liquidator on the distribution of the redemption proceeds among the unsecured creditors. If our appealproposal is successfulaccepted by the liquidator and approved by the court, as well as all the legal matters related to Tele Art,Tele-Art, Inc. are finalized, including the final determination of other creditors’the creditor’s position of Bank of China, then the remaining portion of $3.9 million provision consequently will also be reversed into income infor the related period.

     If our appeal is not successful, and the 1,017,149 (adjusted for ten-for-one stock dividend) share redemption is set aside, we believe that these shares would be sold by Tele-Art, Inc.’s liquidator in the open market at the market price prevailing at the time of sale. For example, if these shares had been sold at the March 1, 2004 closing price of $28.09 per share, the proceeds the liquidator would have realized before commissions, plus withheld dividends of $518,000, would have been approximately $29.1 million for the estate of Tele-Art, Inc. (in liquidation). Furthermore, according to the information provided by existing liquidator as of November 7, 2003, the estimated liabilities for all other unsecured creditors are approximately $353,000. The Bank of China is claiming to be a secured creditor in the amount of approximately $2.7 million, and the January 21, 2003 judgment found that the Bank of China is secured and we are unsecured. We dispute that finding, and among other matters, have argued that the proof of debt of Bank of China was incomplete and invalid. The former liquidator is claiming to have incurred approximately $383,000 in costs for work as the liquidator. Accordingly, if we are not successful on our appeal of the January 21, 2003 judgment, we will seek to recover our $38.0 million in judgment debts from the estate of Tele-Art, Inc. Accordingly, any amount recovered from the state of Tele-Art Inc. in settlement of the claimed judgment debt would be recognized as other income.

     However, there is no assurance that we may realize the entire amount of our judgment debts as Tele-Art Inc. is in liquidation. The actual amount of the recovery, if any, is uncertain, and is dependent on a number of factors including the value of our shares when sold in the market, and the final determination of other creditors’ positions.Bank of China’s position. We plan to continue to pursue vigorously all legal alternatives available to seek to recover the maximum amount of the outstanding debt from Tele-Art, Inc. (in liquidation) as well as to pursue other parties that may have assisted in any transfers of the assets from Tele-Art, Inc. In furtherance of this objective, Nam Tai commenced proceedings in 2002 against David Hague, the former liquidator of Tele-Art, Inc., and PriceWaterhouseCoopers for, inter alia, negligence and breach of statutory duty in their conduct of the liquidation. This matter is still in its initial stages as the Defendants are seeking leave to appeal against the dismissal of their challenge to the jurisdication of the BVI courts in this matter. We may incur substantial additional costs in pursuing our recovery and such costs may not be recoverable.

Note

1.  Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the number of shares was adjusted to 457,050 to reflect the ten-for-one stock dividend.
 
2.  Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the number of shares was adjusted to 560,099 to reflect the ten-for-one stock dividend.

Putative Class Actions

     On March 11, 2003, we were served with a complaint in an action captioned Michael Rocco v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 1148 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Rocco Action. In addition to Nam Tai, certain directors are named as defendants. On or about April 9, 2003, a second complaint was filed in an action captioned A.J. & Celine Steigler v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 2462 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Steigler Action, and together with the Rocco

52


Action, the Actions. The Actions have been consolidated since July 2003 and purports to represent a putative class of persons who purchased the common stock of Nam Tai from July 29, 2002 through February 18, 2003. Plaintiffs in the Actions assert claims under SectionSections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and allege that misrepresentations and/or omissions were made during the alleged class periodsperiod concerning the partial reversal of an inventory provision and a charge to goodwill related to Nam Tai’s LPT segment. We have filed aOur motion to dismiss the lawsuit and thewas denied on September 27, 2004. The putative class action has not been certified as a class action by the court. In any event, our motioncourt but we expect plaintiffs to dismiss was heardseek such certification in November 2003 and we are awaiting the judgment ofnear future. The court has set May 23, 2005 to hear the court thereof.certification motion. Nam Tai believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the case vigorously.

55


Export Sales

Geographic Markets

     Approximate percentages of net sales to customers by geographic area based upon location of product delivery are set forth below for the periods indicated:

             
  Year ended December 31,
  
Geographic Areas 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
China (excluding Hong Kong)  11%  12%  25%
Europe (excluding Estonia)  10   18   21 
Japan  10   11   17 
United States  15   14   14 
Hong Kong  27   24   9 
Estonia     8   5 
North America (excluding United States)  8   3    
Korea  10   7   6 
Other  9   3   3 
   
   
   
 
   100%  100%  100%
   
   
   
 
             
  Year ended December 31,
Geographic Areas 2002 2003 2004
China (excluding Hong Kong)  12%  25%  25%
Europe (excluding Estonia)  18   21   18 
Japan  11   17   6 
United States  14   14   11 
Hong Kong  24   9   30 
Estonia  8   5   1 
North America (excluding United States)  3      1 
Korea  7   6   4 
Other  3   3   4 
   100%  100%  100%

Dividend PolicyDividends

     We have paid an annual dividend for the last teneleven consecutive years. On February 6, 2004,7, 2005, we announced that we were increasing our regular annual dividend to $0.48$1.32 per share to be declared and paid quarterly commencing with the first quarter 20042005 dividend of $0.12$0.33 per share. The following table sets forth the total cash dividends and dividends per share we have declared for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2003,2004, adjusted to give effect to a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003.

                     
  Year ended December 31,
  
  1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
 
 
Total dividends declared (in thousands) $2,942  $12,190  $4,134  $17,056  $37,584 
Regular dividends per share $0.11  $0.12  $0.13  $0.16  $0.20 
Special dividends     0.33      0.33   0.80 
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total dividends per share $0.11  $0.45  $0.13  $0.49  $1.00 
   
   
   
   
   
 
                     
      Year ended December 31,    
  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004 
Total dividends declared (in thousands) $12,190  $4,134  $17,056  $37,584  $20,424 
Regular dividends per share $0.12  $0.13  $0.16  $0.20  $0.48 
Special dividends  0.33      0.33   0.80    
Total dividends per share $0.45  $0.13  $0.49  $1.00  $0.48 

     It is our general policy to determine the actual annual amount of future dividends, if any, based upon our growth during the preceding year. Future dividends, if any, will be in the form of cash or stock or a combination of both. We may not be able to pay dividends in the future or may decide not to declare them in any event. We will determine the amounts of the dividends when they are declared and even if dividends are declared in the future we may not continue them in any future period.

     We declared special dividends in 2002 and 2003 for the reasons described below:

   In 2002, primarily as a result of a realized gain we made from our sale of approximately one-third of our direct investment in Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Company Ltd.; and

   In 2003, in celebration of our fifteenth anniversary since our listing and IPO in 1988, our fifteenth consecutive year of profitability, and the transfer of our shares from the NASDAQ National Market to the NYSE in January 2003.

5653


Item 9.The Listing

     Our common shares are traded in the United States on the NYSE. On January 23, 2003, our common shares were listed on the NYSE under the symbol “NTE.” Prior to that, our common shares were quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “NTAI.”

     The following table sets forth the high and low closing salesales prices for our common shares for the quarters in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,2004, adjusted to give effect to a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003:

                                     
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
          Average         Average         Average
          Daily         Daily         Daily
          Trading         Trading         Trading
  High Low Volume(1) High Low Volume(1) High Low Volume(1)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter $6.38  $4.04   133,887  $6.35  $5.15   153,210  $11.30  $7.92   363,270 
Second Quarter  5.00   4.08   74,195   7.73   6.10   143,827   14.13   6.94   288,459 
Third Quarter  5.10   3.77   63,992   6.86   5.33   54,983   32.90   12.87   734,330 
Fourth Quarter  5.97   4.17   54,684   9.07   6.17   303,351   42.48   26.25   1,393,722 
                                     
  2002  2003  2004 
          Average          Average          Average 
          Daily          Daily          Daily 
          Trading          Trading          Trading 
  High  Low  Volume(1)  High  Low  Volume(1)  High  Low  Volume(1) 
First Quarter $6.35  $5.15   153,210  $11.30  $7.92   363,270  $34.24  $22.30   927,119 
Second Quarter  7.73   6.10   143,827   14.13   6.94   288,459   28.00   13.99   509,173 
Third Quarter  6.86   5.33   54,983   32.90   12.87   734,330   23.51   16.10   412,488 
Fourth Quarter  9.07   6.17   303,351   42.48   26.25   1,393,722   23.14   18.07   283,030 


(1)  Determined by dividing the sum of the reported daily volume for the quarter by the number of trading days in the quarter.

     The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices for each of the last five years ended December 31, adjusted to give effect to a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003:

             
          Daily
          Trading
Year ended High Low Volume(1)

 
 
 
December 31, 2003 $42.48  $6.94   597,858 
December 31, 2002  9.07   5.15   164,011 
December 31, 2001  6.38   3.77   81,656 
December 31, 2000  6.88   4.31   113,644 
December 31, 1999  6.33   2.67   171,761 
             
          Daily 
          Trading 
Year ended High  Low  Volume(1) 
December 31, 2004 $34.24  $13.99   532,568 
December 31, 2003  42.48   6.94   597,858 
December 31, 2002  9.07   5.15   164,011 
December 31, 2001  6.38   3.77   81,656 
December 31, 2000  6.88   4.31   113,644 


(1)  Determined by dividing the sum of the reported daily volume for the year by the number of trading days in the year.

     The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices during each of the most recent six months:

             
          Daily
          Trading
Month ended High Low Volume(1)

 
 
 
February 27, 2004 $33.75  $25.00   1,041,000 
January 31, 2004  34.24   27.88   1,181,705 
December 30, 2003  41.46   26.30   1,800,127 
November 30, 2003  41.85   31.20   1,259,726 
October 31, 2003  42.48   26.25   1,115,678 
September 30, 2003  32.90   24.00   953.886 
             
          Daily 
          Trading 
Month ended High Low  Volume(1) 
February 28, 2005 $24.35   18.80   503,174 
January 31, 2005  19.49   17.25   253,252 
December 31, 2004  19.82   18.07   242,014 
November 30, 2004  20.00   18.28   335,390 
October 31, 2004  23.14   19.50   271,686 
September 30, 2004  22.85   18.75   318,162 


(1)  Determined by dividing the sum of the reported daily volume for the month by the number of trading days in the month.

     On March 9, 2004,11, 2005, the last reported sale price of our common shares on the NYSE was $25.17$27.12 per share. As of March 1, 2004,February 28, 2005, there were 808766 holders of record of our common shares.

54


Item 10.Additional Information

Share Capital

     Our authorized capital consists of 200,000,000 common shares, $0.01 par value per share. On June 20, 2003, we announced a three-for-one stock split effective on June 30, 2003 and a ten-for-one stock dividend effective November 7, 2003. As of March 1, 2004, 41,231,272February 28, 2005, 42,664,536 common shares were outstanding.

57


Memorandum and Articles of Association

     Holders of our common shares are entitled to one vote for each whole share on all matters to be voted upon by shareholders, including the election of directors. Holders of our common shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. All of our common shares are equal to each other with respect to liquidation and dividend rights. Holders of our common shares are entitled to receive dividends if and when declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available under British Virgin Islands law. In the event of our liquidation, all assets available for distribution to the holders of our common shares are distributable among them according to their respective holdings. Holders of our common shares have no preemptive rights to purchase any additional, unissued common shares. All of our outstanding common shares are and the newly issued common shares we are offering pursuant to this prospectus, will be when issued and paid for, duly authorized, validly issued and nonassessable. All of our outstanding common shares are in registered form and the newly issued common shares we are offering pursuant to this prospectus, will be, registered rather thando not have any outstanding bearer shares.

     Pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles of Association and pursuant to the laws of the British Virgin Islands, our Board of Directors without shareholder approval may amend our Memorandum and Articles of Association. This includes amendments to increase or reduce our authorized capital stock. Our ability to amend our Memorandum and Articles of Association without shareholder approval could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of Nam Tai, including a tender offer to purchase our common shares at a premium over the then currentthen-current market price.

     We have never had any class of stock outstanding other than our common shares nor have we ever changed the voting rights with respect to our common shares.

     Our registered office is at 3rd floor 116 Main Street,P.O. Box 3342, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands and we have been assigned company number 3805. Our object or purpose is to engage in any act or activity that is not prohibited under British Virgin Islands law as set forth in Clause 4 of theour Memorandum of Association. As an International Business Company, and as set forth in Clause 6, we are prohibited from doing business with persons resident in the British Virgin Islands, owning real estate in the British Virgin Islands, or accepting banking deposits or contracts of insurance. We do not believe these restrictions materially affect our operations.

     Paragraph 60 of our Amended Articles of Association, or Articles, provides that a director may be counted as one of a quorum in respect of any contract or arrangement in which the director is materially interested or makes with the Company; however, if the agreement or transaction cannot be approved by a resolution of directors without counting the vote or consent of any interested director, the agreement or transaction may only be validated by approval or ratification by a resolution of the shareholders, who are referred under the law of the British Virgin Islands as “members.” Paragraph 53 of the Articles allows the directors to vote compensation to themselves in respect of services rendered to us. Paragraph 69 of the Articles provides that the directors may by resolution exercise all the powers on our behalf to borrow money and to mortgage or charge our undertakings and property or any part thereof, to issue debentures, debenture stock and other securities whenever we borrow money or as security for any of our debts, liabilities or obligations or those of any third party. These borrowing powers can be altered by an amendment to the Articles. There is no provision in ourthe Articles for the mandatory retirement of directors; however, we have fixed 65 as the mandatory age of retirement for our directors. Directors are not required to own our shares in order to serve as directors.

     Paragraph 85 of the Articles allows us to deduct from any shareholder’s dividends amounts owing to us by that shareholder. Paragraph 13.1 provides that we can redeem shares at fair market value from any shareholder against whom we have a judgment debt.

     Paragraph 12 of the Articles provides that without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the holders of any existing shares, any of our shares may be issued with such preferred, deferred or other special rights or such restrictions, whether in regard to dividends, voting, return of capital or otherwise as the directors may from time to time determine.

     Paragraph 14 of the Articles provides that if at any time the authorized share capital is divided into different classes or series of shares, the rights attached to any class or series may be varied with the consent in writing of the holders of not less than three fourthsthree-fourths of the issued shares of any other class or series of shares which may be affected by such variation.

     Provisions in respect of the holding of general meetings and extraordinary general meetings are set out in Paragraphs 27 to 46 of the Articles and under the International Business Companies Act. The directors may convene meetings of our shareholders at such times and in such manner and places as the directors consider necessary or desirable, and they shall convene such a meeting upon the written request of shareholders holding more than 30 percent of the votes of our outstanding voting shares. Other than providing, if

58


requested, reasonable proof of a holder’s status as a holder of our shares as of the applicable record date, there is no condition to the admission of a shareholder or his or her proxy holder to our meetings of shareholders.

55


     British Virgin Islands law and our Memorandum and Articles of Association impose no limitations on the right of nonresident or foreign owners to hold or vote our securities.

     There are no provisions in our Memorandum of Association or Articles of Association governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.

     As a result of the issuance of additional common shares in 2003 pursuant to the three-for-one stock split and increase in the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under the Company’s 1993 Stock Option Plan and 2001 Stock Option Plan, the authorized share capital of the Company was enlarged from $200,000 to $2,000,000 and number of shares was increased from 20,000,000 to 200,000,000. The full text of our Amended Articles and Memorandum, amended on June 26, 2003, we hereby filehad been filed as Exhibit 1.1 with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for 2003.

Transfer Agent

     Registrar and Transfer Agent Company, 10 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016-3572, U.S.A., is the United States transfer agent and registrar for our common shares.

Material Contracts

     The following summarizes each material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which Nam Tai or any subsidiary of Nam Tai is a party, for the two years immediately preceding the filing of this report:

On January 14, 2002, we entered into an agreement with the joint liquidators of Albatronics. Under the agreement we injected our wholly-owned subsidiary J.I.C. Group into a new company for 92.9% ownership in the new company on a fully diluted basis after conversion of preference shares. Albatronics’ listing status on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange was withdrawn and the new company was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange by way of introduction and free from the liabilities of Albatronics. Immediately following completion of this reverse merger, we, the creditors and the public beneficially owned approximately 70.4%, 24.1% and 5.5% of the enlarged issued ordinary share capital of the new company, respectively, and we also hold preference shares. Upon our full conversion of the preference shares, we, the creditors and the public will own approximately 92.9%, 5.8% and 1.3% of the enlarged issued ordinary share capital of the new company, respectively. No holder of preference shares is entitled to exercise its conversion right if such conversion would result in the minimum public float of 25% as required under the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Listing Rules not being met. Consummation of the agreement was subject to the fulfillment of a number of conditions including approval by Albatronics’ creditors and shareholders and the Listing Committee of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and the receipt of other regulatory and court approvals. The agreement was consummated in the second quarter of 2002.
Share Transfer Agreement dated January 25, 2002 between Hui Zhou City Investment Holdings Co., Ltd., as seller, and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., as buyer, under which Hui Zhou City agreed to transfer a 6% equity interest in TCL Holdings Corporation Ltd. to Namtai Electronic for Chinese renminbi 98,520,000 (approximately $12.0 million).
On March 20, 2002, an Agreement was entered between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. for the production of Camera August to Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Ltd. signed a banking facility letter on March 27, 2002 with Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. for a four-year term loan with borrowings totaling $4,500,000. The loan is charged at an annual rate of 1.5% over the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate and is repayable in 16 quarterly payments of US$281,250 plus interest accrued.
On April 24, 2002, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited, or NTEE, entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Toshiba Battery Co., Ltd., or Toshiba, and A&T Battery Corp., or ATB, under which NTEE agreed to transfer its 86.7% equity interest in BPC (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. to ATB in exchange for $1,300,000 from ATB and $800,000 from Toshiba, which was related to the termination of a license.

59


We entered into a Subscription Agreement with TCL International Holdings Ltd. on September 6, 2002 under which we agreed to purchase HK$40,000,000 (approximately $5.1 million) of 3% convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd. that mature three years after issuance.
We entered into a Subscription Agreement with Alpha Star Investments Ltd. on January 6, 2003 under which Nam Tai agreed to purchase 1,625,000 newly issued ordinary shares of Alpha Star Investments Ltd. (25% ownership) for $10,000,000. We agreed to sign a shareholders agreement and Alpha Star Investments Ltd. agreed to place with us or a party we nominate at least 50% of the orders for RF modules that it or its subsidiaries receive.
On January 1, 2003, a Basic Agreement was entered into between Optrex Corporation and Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited for the manufacturing of LCD modules for cellular phones for Optrex Corporation.
On January 8, 2003, we entered into a Shareholders Agreement with the other three shareholders of Alpha Star under which each shareholder is granted a right of first refusal and is generally prohibited from competing against Alpha Star.
On January 8, 2003, a Basic Agreement was entered into between JCT Wireless Technology Ltd. and Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited for manufacturing and assembly of various products, including mother boards, LCD modules, FPC and RF modules, for JCT Wireless Technology Ltd.
On January 10, 2003, an Agreement was entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. for the production of Camera August C1 for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.
On January 10, 2003, an Agreement was entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. for the production of Camera Filip for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.
On January 27, 2003, an Agreement was entered into among Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd., Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited for the production of LCD modules for Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd.
A Sale and Purchase Agreement was entered into between Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited and J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited on March 10, 2003 for selling LCD panels, ACFs and ICs to Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.
A Sale and Purchase Agreement was entered into between J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on March 10, 2003 for selling COG panels to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.
On June 26, 2003, an Agreement Amendment was entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. for amending the agreements entered into on March 20, 2002 and January 10, 2003.
  An Agreement was entered into between J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and Glory Gate Enterprises Limited on June 28, 2003 for the disposal of transformers operation to Glory Gate Enterprises Limited.

  On July 15,3, 2003, ana Sale and Purchase Agreement was entered into between Omnivision Technologies, Inc.Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) and NamtaiNam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Cayman Islands) regarding the purchase of the entire 100% interest in Nam Tai Electronic (Shenzhen) CompanyCo., Ltd. by Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited for supplying CMOS sensor to Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.(Cayman Islands).

  On August 22, 2003, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with Citigroup Global Markets Limited for the sale of 3% convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd. at an aggregate price of HK$39,555,068.49 (approximately $5.03 million).
On September 8, 2003, a Basic Agreement and two memorandums were entered into between Wuxi Sharp Electronic Component Co. Ltd. and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited for assembling of PCBs for Wuxi Sharp Electronic Component Co. Ltd.
On September 9, 2003, an Agreement was entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company for the production of flash for cellular phones for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.

60


On September 15, 2003, an Agreement was entered into between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. for the production of CMOS sensor modules for Sony Computer Entertainment Europe and its nominated distributors.
On September 19, 2003, a Specific Service Agreement was entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Ltd. for the manufacturing of bluetooth headset for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
  On October 28, 2003, a Construction Agreement, with commencement date of September 23, 2003, was entered into between Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Takasago Thermal Engineering (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. for the construction of new factory premises. The construction is expected to bewas completed by the end of the fourth quarter in 2004.

  On December 9, 2003, an Investment Agreement and Shareholders Agreement was entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. for acquiring an 11.33% equity interest in Stepmind with a consideration of approximately $5.3 million.

  On January 2, 2004, a Supplemental Agreement was entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. for consenting to release the second phrase of payment and increase capital investment in Stepmind should Stepmind fulfill certain conditions.

  On March 10, 2004, an Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Group Management Limited and Frontier Profit Inc. for selling Flat A, 22nd Floor, Tower 2 and Car Parking Space No. A86, The Leighton Hill, 2B Broadwood Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong to Frontier Profit Inc. with a consideration of approximately $1.8 million.

•  On March 26, 2004, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed by Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) to confirm the respective rights and liabilities of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. under an internal restructuring.

•  On March 31, 2004, a Sale and Purchase Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Mr. Wong Toe Yeung regarding purchasing the entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace Limited from Mr. Wong Toe Yeung with the consideration of disposal of a 72.2% interest in Mate Fair Group Limited, cash of $25 million and 2,389,974 shares issued by Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.

•  On April 8, 2004, a Trademark License Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited for the use of certain “Namtai” trademarks.

56


•  On April 15, 2004, a Deed of Indemnity was entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited in favour of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited regarding the Global Offering of 200,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.

•  On April 15, 2004, an Underwriting Agreement was entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. as the selling shareholder and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, BNP Paribas Peregrine Capital Limited, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, Cazenove Asia Limited, DBS Asia Capital Limited and VC CEF Capital Limited as public offer underwriters regarding the public offering of 20,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.

•  On April 21, 2004, a Supplemental Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., and Mr. Wong Toe Yeung regarding to adjust the consideration for purchasing entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace Limited by canceling 973,210 common shares of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., issued to Top Scale Company Limited on April 21, 2004.

•  On April 22, 2004, an Underwriting Agreement was entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. as the selling shareholder and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, BNP Paribas Peregrine Capital Limited, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, Cazenove Asia Limited, DBS Asia Capital Limited and VC CEF Capital Limited as international placing underwriters regarding the international placing of 180,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.

•  On April 22, 2004, a Pricing Determination Agreement was entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited for determining the offering price of the shares of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited to be HK$3.88 per share.

•  On April 22, 2004, a Stock Borrowing Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited regarding the Global Offering of 200,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.

•  On August 4, 2004, an Accession Agreement was entered into between Welcome Success Technology Ltd. and Mr. Alain Jolivet in relation to the transfer of entire interest in Stepmind to Remote Reward SAS and became a party to the Shareholders Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., AGF Innovation 3, AGF Innovation 4, AGF Innovation 5, Mighty Wealth Group Limited, Remote Reward SAS, Mr. Alain Jolivet and Mr. Andre Jolivet executed on November 28, 2003, December 9, 2003 and December 10, 2003.

•  On August 18, 2004, an Escrow Agreement was entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., Welcome Success Technology Ltd., Remote Reward SAS, Johnson Stokes & Master, Mr. Andre Jolivet and Mr. Alain Jolivet in relation to the disposal of 1,457,720 shares in Stepmind to Remote Reward SAS with a consideration of Euros 4,253,301.98.

•  On August 19, 2004, a Subscription Agreement was entered into among TCL Industries Holdings (HK) Limited, TCL International Holdings Limited, Cheerful Asset Investments Limited, Jasper Ace Limited, Mate Fair Group Limited, and TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited for subscribing 254,474,910 shares in TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited in a consideration of RMB131,283,020.

•  On September 20, 2004, a Deed of Assignment of Trademarks was entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. for assigning “Namtai & device” trademarks to Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.

•  Banking Facilities Letter from the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited to Nam Tai Group Management Limited on September 24, 2004 regarding the renewal of Overdraft Facility of HK$500,000, Treasury Facilities of US$30,000,000 and Corporate Card of HK$1,100,000.

•  On October 15, 2004, a Share Transfer Agreement was entered into between J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited and J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for the disposal of the entire issued share capital of Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for a consideration of HK$105,878,396.

Exchange Controls

     There are no exchange control restrictions on payments of dividends, interest, or other payments to nonresident holders of Nam Tai’s securities or on the conduct of our operations in Hong Kong and PRC headquarters in Macao China or where our principal executive offices are located in the British Virgin Islands, where Nam Tai is incorporated. Other jurisdictions in which we conduct operations may have various exchange controls. With respect to our China subsidiaries, with the exception of a requirement that 10% of profits be reserved for future developments, there are no restrictions on the payment of dividends and the removal of dividends from China once all taxes are paid and assessed and losses, if any, from previous years have been made good. We believe such restrictions will not have a material effect on our liquidity or cash flow.

Taxation57


Taxation

United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

     The discussion below is for general information only and is not, and should not be interpreted to be, tax advice to any holder of our common shares. Each holder or a prospective holder of our common shares is urged to consult his, her or its own tax advisor.

General

     This section is a general summary of the material United States federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders, as defined below, of the ownership and disposition of our common shares as of the date of this report. This summary is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, the applicable Treasury regulations promulgated and proposed thereunder, judicial decisions and current administrative rulings and practice, all of which are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. The summary applies to you only if you hold our common shares as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. The United States Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, may challenge the tax consequences described below, and we have not requested, nor will we request, a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel with respect to the United States federal income tax consequences of acquiring, holding or disposing of our common shares. This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to the ownership of our common shares. In particular, the discussion below does not cover tax consequences that depend upon your particular tax circumstances nor does it cover any state, local or foreign law, or the possible application of United States federal estate or gift tax. You are urged to consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of the United States federal income tax laws to your particular situation as well as any state, local, foreign and the United States federal estate and gift tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of the common shares. In addition, this summary does not take into account any special United States federal income tax rules that apply to a particular holder of our common shares, including, without limitation, the following:

61


  a dealer in securities or currencies;

  a trader in securities that elects to use a market-to-market method of accounting for its securities holdings;

  a financial institution or a bank;

  an insurance company;

  a tax-exempt organization;

  a person that holds our common shares in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle or a conversion transaction;

  a person whose functional currency for United States federal income tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;

  a person liable for alternative minimum tax;

  a person that owns, or is treated as owning, 10% or more, by voting power or value, of our common shares; or

  a person who receives our shares pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation.

     For purposes of the discussion below, you are a “U.S. Holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares who or which is:

  an individual United States citizen or resident alien of the United States (as specifically defined for United States federal income tax purposes);

  a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof;

  an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or

  a trust (x) if a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more United States persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (y) if it was in existence on August 20, 1996, was treated as a United States person prior to that date and has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.

58


Distributions on Our Common Shares

     Subject to the passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, considerations discussed below, the gross amount of any cash distribution or the fair market value of any property distributed that you receive with respect to our common shares generally will be subject to tax as ordinary dividend income to the extent such distribution does not exceed our current or accumulated earnings and profits, or E&P, as calculated for United States federal income tax purposes. Such income will be includable in your gross income on the date of receipt. Subject to certain limitations, dividends paid to noncorporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation if we are a “qualified foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A qualified foreign corporation includes (i) a foreign corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that includes an exchange of information program, and (ii) a foreign corporation if its stock with respect to which a dividend is paid is readily tradable on an established securities market within the United States, but does not include an otherwise qualified corporation that is a PFIC. We believe that we will be a qualified foreign corporation for so long as we are not a PFIC and our common shares are considered to be readily tradable on an established securities market within the United States. No assurances can be made that our Company’s status as a qualified foreign corporation will not change. To the extent any distribution exceeds our E&P, such distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of your adjusted tax basis in our common shares and will be applied against and reduce such basis on a dollar-for-dollar basis (thereby increasing the amount of gain and decreasing the amount of loss recognized on a subsequent disposition of such shares). To the extent that such distribution exceeds your adjusted tax

62


basis in our common shares, the distribution will be treated as capital gain. Because we are not a United States corporation, no dividends-received deduction will be allowed to corporations with respect to dividends paid by us.

     For United States foreign tax credit limitation purposes, dividends received on our common shares will be treated as foreign source income and generally will be “passive income,” or in the case of certain holders, “financial services income.” For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006, dividends generally will be “passive category income,” or in the case of certain holders, “general category income.” You may be eligible, subject to a number of complex limitations, to claim a foreign tax credit in respect of foreign withholding taxes, if any, imposed on dividends received on our common shares. The rules governing United States foreign tax credits are complex, and we recommend that you consult your tax advisor regarding the applicability of such rules to you.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Shares

     Subject to the PFIC considerations discussed below, generally, in connection with the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common shares:

you will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference (if any) between:
•  you will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference (if any) between:

–  the amount realized on such sale, exchange or other taxable disposition and
 
–  your adjusted tax basis in such common shares (your adjusted tax basis in the shares you hold generally will equal your U.S. dollar cost of such shares);

  such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if your holding period for our common shares is more than one year at the time of such sale or other disposition;
 
  such gain or loss will generally be treated as United States source for United States foreign tax credit purposes; and
 
  your ability to deduct capital losses is subject to limitations.

PFIC Considerations

     A foreign corporation will be treated as a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes if, after applying relevant look-through rules with respect to the income and assets of subsidiaries, 75% or more of its gross income consists of certain types of passive income or 50% or more of the gross value of its assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other that rents and royalties derived in the active conduct of a trade or business), annuities and gains from assets that produce passive income. We presently believe that we are not a PFIC and do not anticipate becoming a PFIC. This is, however, a factual determination made on an annual basis and is subject to change. If we were to be classified as a PFIC in any taxable year, (i) U.S. Holders would generally be required to treat any gain on sales of our shares held by them as ordinary income and to pay an interest charge on the value of the deferral of their United States federal income tax attributable to such gain and (ii) distributions paid by us to our U.S. Holders could also be subject to an interest charge. In addition, we would not provide information to our U.S. Holders that would enable them to make a “qualified electing fund” election under which, generally, in lieu of the foregoing treatment, our earnings would be currently included in their United States federal income.

59


Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

     Payments, including dividends and proceeds of sales, in respect of our common shares that are made in the United States or by a United States related financial intermediary will be subject to United States information reporting rules. In addition, such payments may be subject to United States federal backup withholding tax. You will not be subject to backup withholding provided that:

  you are a corporation or other exempt recipient, or
 
  you provide your correct United States federal taxpayer identification number and certify, under penalties of perjury, that you are not subject to backup withholding.

63


     Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against your United States federal income tax, and you may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the IRS in a timely manner.

BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS TAX CONSIDERATIONS

     Under the International Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands as currently in effect, a holder of common equity, such as our common shares, who is not a resident of the British Virgin Islands is exempt from British Virgin Islands income tax on dividends paid with respect to the common equity and is not liable to the British Virgin Islands for income tax on gains realized on sale or disposal of such shares. Furthermore, there are no capital gains, gift or inheritance taxes levied by the British Virgin Islands on persons who are not residents of the British Virgin Islands. The British Virgin Islands does not impose a withholding tax on dividends paid by a company incorporated under the International Business Companies Act.

     Our common shares are not subject to transfer taxes, stamp duties or similar charges. There is no income tax treaty or convention currently in effect between the United States and the British Virgin Islands.

Documents on Display

     Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. is subject to the information requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and, in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. files annual reports on Form 20-F within six months of its fiscal year end, and submit other reports and information under cover of Form 6-K with the SEC. You may read and copy this information at the SEC’s public reference room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Recent filings and reports are also available free of charge though the EDGAR electronic filing system at www.sec.gov. You can also request copies of the documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the public reference section of the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room or accessing documents through EDGAR. As a foreign private issuer, Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. is exempt from the rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements to shareholders.

Item 11.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Currency Fluctuations

     See Exchange Rate Fluctuation discussionWe sell a majority of our products in Item 3. Key Information — Risk FactorsUS dollars and Item 5. Operatingpay for our material components in Japanese yen, U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars, and Financial ReviewChinese renminbi. We pay labor costs and Prospectsoverhead expenses in Chinese renminbi, the currency of China (the basic unit of which is the yuan), Hong Kong dollars and Japanese yen. The exchange rate of the Hong Kong dollar to the U.S. dollar has been fixed by the Hong Kong government since 1983 at approximately HK$7.80 to US$1.00, through the currency-issuing banks in Hong Kong and, accordingly, has not in the past presented a currency exchange risk. This could change in the future if those in Hong Kong arguing for a floating currency system prevail in the ongoing debate over whether to continue to peg the Hong Kong dollar to the US dollar.

     We believe our most significant foreign exchange risk results from material purchases made in Japanese yen. Approximately 8%, 16% and 6%, respectively, of our material costs have been in Japanese yen during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004. Sales made in Japanese yen account for less than 11% of sales for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Our business and operating results could be materially and adversely affected in the event of a severe increase in the value of the Japanese yen to the US dollar at a time when our sales made in Japanese yen are insufficient to cover our material purchases in Japanese yen.

     Beginning on pages 10December 1, 1996, the Chinese renminbi became fully convertible under the current accounts. There are no restrictions on trade-related foreign exchange receipts and 45, respectively.disbursements in China. Capital account foreign exchange receipts and disbursements are subject to control, and organizations in China are restricted in foreign currency transactions that must take place through designated banks.

60


     We may elect to hedge our currency exchange risk when we judge that such action may be required. In an attempt to lower the costs of expenditures in foreign currencies, we may enter into forward contracts or option contracts to buy or sell foreign currency(ies) against the U.S. dollar through one of our banks. As a result, we may suffer losses resulting from the fluctuation between the buy forward exchange rate and the sell forward exchange rate, or from the price of the option premium.

     As of December 31, 2004, we held no option or future contracts and during the year we did not purchase or sell any commodity or currency options. We are continuing to review our hedging strategy and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer losses in the future as a result of hedging activities.

Foreign Currency Risk

     See Foreign Currency Risk discussionAs of December 31, 2004, we had no open forward contracts or option contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies.

     Cash on hand at December 31, 2004 of $160,649,000 was held in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects on page 45.the following currencies.

Equivalent
U.S. Dollar
Holdings
December 31, 2004
Japanese yen5,554,000
United States dollars131,561,000
Hong Kong dollar5,823,000
Chinese renminbi17,700,000
Macao Pataca11,000

Interest Rate Risk

     See Interest Rate Risk discussionShort-term interest rate risk

     Our interest expenses and income are sensitive to changes in Item 5. Operatinginterest rates. All of our cash reserves and Financial Reviewshort-term borrowings are subject to interest rate changes. Cash on hand of $160.6 million as of December 31, 2004 was invested in short-term interest-bearing investments having a maturity of three months or less. As such, interest income will fluctuate with changes in short-term interest rates. In 2004, we had $1.1 million in interest income and Prospects$195,000 in interest expense.

     As of December 31, 2004, we had utilized approximately $3.4 million of our credit facilities, including $2.1 million in short-term notes payable resulting in minimal interest rate risk.

Long-term interest rate risk

     As of December 31, 2004, we had $8.0 million in long-term bank borrowing, including the current portion of $2.9 million.

     Our long-term bank borrowing consisted of a $4.5 million term loan obtained in May 2002, has a term of four years and bear interest at a rate of 1.5% and subsequently changed to 0.75% effective August 2004 over three months’ LIBOR repayable in 16 quarterly installments of $281,250 beginning August 2002. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2004 was $1.7 million. A $1.6 million term loan obtained in April 2004 has a term of four years and bears interest at a rate of 0.75% over three months’ LIBOR repayable in 16 quarterly installments of $100,000 beginning July 2004. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2004 was $1.4 million. A $3.6 million term loan obtained in June 2004 has a term of four years and bears interest at a rate of 0.75% over three months’ LIBOR repayable in 16 quarterly installments of $225,000 beginning September, 2004. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2004 was $3.2 million. A $1.8 million term loan obtained in December 2004 has a term of four years and bears interest at a rate of 0.75% over three months’ LIBOR repayable in 16 quarterly installments of $112,500 beginning March 2005.

     We obtained a seven-year $15.0 million term loan in the fourth quarter of 2001 with a fixed rate of interest of 5.05% for the first four years and 1% over the SIBOR rate for the last three years. The term loan had an outstanding balance of $12.9 million as of December 31, 2002. We repaid this term loan on page 45.January 3, 2003.

Item 12.Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

     Not applicable

6461


PART II

Item 13.Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

     Not applicable

Item 14.Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

     Not applicable

Item 15.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controlsDisclosure Controls and proceduresProcedures

     As required by Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2003,2004, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934). This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s controls and procedures were designed and provided reasonable assurance of preventing errors and irregularities.

     Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosures. The Company’s management have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report and have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

     The Company has confidence in its internal controls and procedures and has expanded its efforts to develop and improve its controls. Nevertheless, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure procedures and controls, or its internal controls, will necessarily prevent all error or intentional fraud. An internal control system, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of such internal controls are met. Further, the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that the Company is subject to resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all internal control issues or instances of fraud, if any, within the Company be detected.

Changes in internal controlsInternal Controls

     There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out this evaluation.

Item 16.[Reserved]

Item 16 A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

     The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that one member of the Audit Committee, Mark Waslen, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by Item 401(h) of Regulation S-KmS-K, adopted pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Waslen has a degree in Accounting and is a C.F.A., C.A. and a C.P.A. In addition to serving in various financial positions, including Nam Tai Group Financial Controller from 1990 to 1995 and Treasurer from 1998 to 1999, at Nam Tai, Mr. Waslen has worked at Peat Marwick Thorne, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and BME+ Partners Chartered Accountants.

     All three members of the audit committee, Messrs. Waslen, Chu and Lo, are independent non-executive directors.

62


Item 16 B. Code of Ethics

     The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, which applies to the Company’s principal executive officerofficers and to its principal financial and accounting officers. In July 2004, the Code of Ethics was revised to apply to all employees. A copy of the revised Code of Ethics is attached as Exhibit 14.1 to this Annual Report on Form 20-F. These codes have been posted on our website, which is located athttp://www.namtai.com/corpgov/corpgov.htm. The contents of this website address, other than the corporate governance guidelines, the code of ethics and committee charters, are not a part of this Form 20-F. Stockholders may request a free copy in print form from:

65


Pan Pacific I.R. Ltd.
Attention : Investor Relations Office
Suite 1790 - 999 W. Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6C 2W2
Toll Free Telephone : 1-800-661-8831

Item 16 C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu has served as our independent public accountant for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003,2004, for which audited financial statements appear in this annual report on Form 20-F. The auditor is elected annually at the Annual General Meeting. The Audit Committee will propose to the Annual General Meeting convening on June 11, 20046, 2005 that Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu be elected as the auditor for 2004.2005.

     The following table presents the aggregate fees for professional services and other services rendered by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu to us in 20032004 and 2002.

         
  2003 2002
  US$’000 US$’000
  
 
Audit Fees(1)  271   152 
Audit-related Fees(2)  1   12 
Tax Fees(3)  11   4 
All Other Fees(4)  8    
   
   
 
Total  291   168 
   
   
 
2003.
         
  2004  2003 
  US$’000  US$’000 
Audit Fees(1)  702   271 
Audit-related Fees(2)  21   1 
Tax Fees(3)  3   11 
All Other Fees(4)  15   8 
       
Total  741   291 
       


(1) Audit Fees consist of fees billed for the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements and the statutory financial statements of our subsidiaries. They also include fees billed for other audit services, which are those services that only the external auditor reasonably can provide, and include the provision of comfort letters and consents, and attestation services relating to the review of documents filed with the SEC. The fees for 20032004 include US$40159 of accrued audit fees for the 2004 year-end audit that were not billed until 2005. The fees for 2003 included $40 of accrued audit fees for the 2003 year-end audit that were not billed until 2004; the fees for 2002 did not include any of accrued audit fees for the 2002 year-end audit that were not billed until 2003.2004.

(2) Audit-related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor.

(3) Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance services, including the preparation of original and amended tax returns and claims for refund; tax consultations, such as assistance and representation in connection with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, transfer pricing, and requests for rulings or technical advice from tax authorities; tax planning services; and expatriate tax compliance, consultation and planning services.

(4) All Other Fees includes business advisory service fee.

63


Audit Committee Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

     The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible, among other matters, for the oversight of the external auditor subject to the relevant regulations of the SEC and NYSE. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy, or the Policy, regarding pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent auditors..auditors.

     Under the Policy, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is delegated the authority to grant pre-approvals in respect of all auditing services including non-audit service, but excluding those services stipulated in Section 201 “Service Outsider the Scope of Practice of Auditors”. Moreover, if the Audit Committee approves an audit service within the scope of the engagement of the audit service, such audit service shall be deemed to have been pre-approved. The decisions of the Chairman of the Audit Committee made under delegation authority to pre-approve an activity shall be presented to the Audit Committee at each of its scheduled meetings.

     Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee are submitted to the Audit Committee by both the external auditor and the Chief Financial Officer.

     During 2003 and 2004, services provided to us by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu representing less than 8.2%49.6% and 0.0%, respectively, of the total non-audit service fees were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minima is exception to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

Item 16 D. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

     Not applicable

66


PART III

Item 17.Financial Statements

     Not Applicable

Item 18.Financial Statements

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   
Independent Auditors’ Reports F-1F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 F-2F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20022003 and 20032004 F-3F-4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 F-4F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 F-5F-6 – F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-7F-8 – F-36

     The information required within the schedules for which provisions are made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission is either not applicable or is included in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

6764


Item 19Exhibits.

          The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report:

Exhibit
NumberDESCRIPTION
1.1Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended on June 26, 2003.*
4.1Purchase Agreement entered into between Citigroup Global Markets Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on August 22, 2003 for the sale of 3% convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd. at an aggregate price of HK$39,555,068.49 (approximately $5.03 million).*
4.2Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and Glory Gate Enterprises Limited on June 28, 2003 for the disposal of transformers operation to Glory Gate Enterprises Limited for approximately $2.4 million.*
4.3Equity Interest Transfer Agreement between Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited HK and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited July 3, 2003.
4.4Construction Agreement, with commencement date of September 23, 2003, entered into between Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and Takasago Thermal Engineering (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. on October 28, 2003 for the construction of new factory premises.*
4.5An Investment Agreement and Shareholders Agreement entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on December 9, 2003 for acquiring an 11.33% equity interest in Stepmind with a consideration of approximately $5.3 million.*
4.6A Supplemental Agreement entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on January 2, 2004 for consenting to the release of the second phase of payment and increasing capital investment in Stepmind should Stepmind fulfill certain conditions.*
4.7Land Title Rights Issued by Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Planning and Land Resources February 16, 2004.
4.8An Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Group Management limited and Frontier Profit Inc. on March 10, 2004 for selling Flat A, 22nd Floor, Tower 2 and Car Parking Space No. A86, The Leighton Hill, 28 Broadwood Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong to Frontier Profit Inc.*
4.9A Memorandum of Understanding signed by Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) on March 26, 2004 to confirm the respective rights and liabilities of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. under an internal restructuring.
4.10A Sale and Purchaser Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Mr. Wong Toe Yeung on March 31, 2004 regarding purchasing the entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace Limited from Mr. Wong Toe Yeung with the consideration of disposal 72.2% interest in Mate Fair Group Limited, cash of $25 million and 2,389,974 shares issued by Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.
4.11A Trademark License Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited on April 8, 2004 for the use of certain “Namtai” trademarks.
4.12A Deed of Indemnity entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited on April 15, 2004 in favour of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited regarding the Global Offering of 200,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.
4.13An Underwriting Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. as the selling shareholders and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, BNP Paribas Peregrine Capital Limited, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, Cazenove Asia Limited, BDS Asia Capital Limited and VC CEF Capital Limited as public offer underwriters on April 15, 2004 regarding the public offering of 20,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.
4.14A Supplemental Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, and Mr. Wong Toe Yeung on July 27, 2004 to adjust the consideration for purchasing the entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace Limited by canceling 973,210 common shares of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, issued to Top Scale Company Limited on April 21, 2004.
4.15An Underwriting Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. as the selling shareholders and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, BNP Paribas Peregrine Capital Limited, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, Cazenove Asia Limited, BDS Asia Capital Limited and VC CEF Capital Limited as international placement underwriters on April 22, 2004 regarding the international placing of 180,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.
4.16A Pricing Determination Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited on April 22, 2004 for determining the offering price of the shares of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited to be HK$3.88 per share.
4.17A Stock Borrowing Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited on April 22, 2004 regarding the Global Offering of 200,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.


Exhibit
NumberDESCRIPTION
4.18Amended 2001 Option Plan July 30, 2004
4.19An Accession Agreement entered into between Welcome Success Technology Ltd. and Mr. Alain Jolivet on August 4, 2004 in relation to the transfer of entire interest in Stepmind to Remote Reward SAS and who became a party to the Shareholders Agreement which entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. , AGF Innovation 3, AGF Innovation 4, AGF Innovation 5, Mighty Wealth Group Limited, Remote Reward SAS, Mr. Alain Jolivet and Mr. Andre Jolivet executed on November 278, 2003, December 9, 2003 and December 10, 2003.
4.20An Escrow Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., Welcome Success Technology Limited, Remote Reward SAS, Johnson Stokes & Master, Mr. Andre Jolivet and Mr. Alain Jolivet on August 18, 2004 in relation to the disposal of 1,457,720 shares in Stepmind to Remote Reward SAS with a consideration of Euros 4,253,301.98.
4.21A subscription Agreement entered into among TCL Industries Holdings (HK) Limited, TCL International holdings Limited, Cheerful Asset Investments Limited, Jasper Ace Limited, Mate Fair Group Limited, and TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited on August 19, 2004 for subscribing 254,474,910 shares in TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited in a consideration of RMB131,283,020.
4.22A Deed of Assignment of Trademarks entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. on September 20, 2004 for assigning “Namtai & device” trademarks to Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.
4.23A Banking Facilities Letter from the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited to Nam Tai Group Management Limited on September 24, 2004 regarding the renewal of Overdraft Facility of HK$500,000, Treasury Facilities of US$30,000,000 and Corporate Card of HK$1,100,000.
4.24A Share Transfer Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited and J.I.C. Technology Company Limited on October 15, 2004 for the disposal of the entire issued share capital of Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for a consideration of HK$105,878,396.
8.1Diagram of Company’s subsidiaries. See Page 24 of this report.
10.1Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 10, 2003. **
10.2Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 17, 2003. **
12.1Certification pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
12.2Certification pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
14.1Code of Ethics.
23.1Consent of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
99.1Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.2Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*Previously filed with the registrant’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 10, 2004.
**Previously filed with the registrant’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on February 28, 2003.


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page(s)
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6 – F-7
F-8 – F-36

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20022003 and 2003,2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003.2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditingthe standards generally accepted inof the United States of America.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. AnThe Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesstatements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 20022003 and 2003,2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20032004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in note 2(f) to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002, the Company changed its method of accounting of goodwill and other intangibles.

DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU


Certified Public Accountants
Hong Kong
March 5, 20044, 2005

F-1F-2


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands of US dollars, except per share data)

             
  Year ended December 31,
  
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
Net sales - third parties $212,934  $228,167  $385,524 
Net sales - related party  21,072   7,849   20,782 
   
   
   
 
Total net sales  234,006   236,016   406,306 
Cost of sales  203,974   197,956   340,016 
   
   
   
 
Gross profit  30,032   38,060   66,290 
   
   
   
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  21,974   17,983   24,866 
Research and development expenses  2,954   2,686   4,037 
Impairment of goodwill     339    
   
   
   
 
Total operating expenses  24,928   21,008   28,903 
   
   
   
 
Income from operations  5,104   17,052   37,387 
Equity in income of affiliated companies  1,867   10,741   498 
Other income (expenses), net  2,709   (6,043)  5,525 
Interest expense  (178)  (790)  (121)
   
   
   
 
Income before income taxes and minority interests  9,502   20,960   43,289 
Income taxes expense, net  (227)  (773)  (399)
   
   
   
 
Income before minority interests  9,275   20,187   42,890 
Minority interests  (230)  (164)  (1,067)
   
   
   
 
Income after minority interests  9,045   20,023   41,823 
Discontinued operation        1,979 
   
   
   
 
Net income $9,045  $20,023  $43,802 
   
   
   
 
Basic earnings per share $0.27  $0.57  $1.09 
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share $0.26  $0.57  $1.07 
   
   
   
 
             
  Year ended December 31, 
  2002  2003  2004 
 
Net sales - third parties $228,167  $385,524  $499,680 
Net sales - related party  7,849   20,782   34,181 
   
Total net sales  236,016   406,306   533,861 
Cost of sales  197,956   340,016   457,385 
   
Gross profit  38,060   66,290   76,476 
   
             
Selling, general and administrative expenses  17,983   24,866   28,053 
Research and development expenses  2,686   4,037   5,045 
Impairment of goodwill  339       
   
Total operating expenses  21,008   28,903   33,098 
   
             
Income from operations  17,052   37,387   43,378 
Other (expenses) income, net  (6,859)  2,899   17,283 
Gain on partial disposal of subsidiaries  17   1,838   77,320 
Unrealized loss on marketable securities        (58,316)
Interest income  799   788   1,110 
Interest expense  (790)  (121)  (195)
   
Income before income taxes and minority interests  10,219   42,791   80,580 
Income taxes  (773)  (399)  (879)
   
             
Income before minority interests and equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  9,446   42,392   79,701 
Minority interests  (164)  (1,067)  (6,010)
Equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  10,741   498   (6,806)
   
             
Income after minority interests and equity in income (loss) of affiliated companies  20,023   41,823   66,885 
Discontinued operation     1,979    
   
             
Net income $20,023  $43,802  $66,885 
   
             
Basic earnings per share $0.57  $1.09  $1.57 
   
             
Diluted earnings per share $0.57  $1.07  $1.57 
   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2F-3


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of US dollars, except share data)

           
    December 31,
    
    2002 2003
    
 
ASSETS
        
Current assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $82,477  $61,827 
 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $122 and $119 at December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively  50,944   62,090 
 Amount due from a related party     2,707 
 Inventories  19,200   27,032 
 Prepaid expenses and other receivables  1,867   13,126 
 Income taxes recoverable  855   4,922 
   
   
 
  Total current assets  155,343   171,704 
Investment in an affiliated company     9,855 
Investments, at cost  15,982   16,366 
Convertible notes  5,128    
Property, plant and equipment, net  75,914   77,647 
Goodwill  21,308   20,137 
Intangible assets     551 
Other assets  1,411   1,435 
   
   
 
  Total assets $275,086  $297,695 
   
   
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
        
Current liabilities:        
 Notes payable $985  $1,879 
 Long term bank loans - current portion  13,985   1,125 
 Accounts payable  38,714   55,674 
 Accrued expenses and other payables  12,609   13,633 
 Dividend payable  1,442   2,062 
 Income taxes payable  200   530 
   
   
 
  Total current liabilities  67,935   74,903 
Deferred income taxes  112   78 
Long term bank loans - non-current portion  2,812   1,688 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities  70,859   76,669 
   
   
 
Minority interests  2,099   3,908 
   
   
 
Commitments and contingencies      
Shareholders’ equity:        
 Common shares (2003: $0.01 par value - authorized 200,000,000 shares)  360   412 
 Additional paid-in capital  147,754   206,845 
 Retained earnings  54,016   9,863 
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (2)  (2)
   
   
 
  Total shareholders’ equity  202,128   217,118 
   
   
 
  Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $275,086  $297,695 
   
   
 
         
  December 31, 
  2003  2004 
 
ASSETS
        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $61,827  $160,649 
Marketable securities     41,906 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $119 and $157 at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively  62,090   90,362 
Amount due from a related party  2,707   66 
Inventories  27,032   23,096 
Prepaid expenses and other receivables  9,799   12,087 
Income taxes recoverable  4,922   6,566 
   
         
Total current assets  168,377   334,732 
         
Investment in an affiliated company  9,855   3,049 
Investments, at cost  16,366    
Property, plant and equipment, net  77,647   97,441 
Deposits for property, plant and equipment  3,327   7,701 
Goodwill, net  20,137   15,831 
Intangible assets, net  551   459 
Other assets  1,435   1,260 
   
         
Total assets $297,695  $460,473 
   
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
        
         
Current liabilities:        
Notes payable $1,879  $2,080 
Long term bank loans - current portion  1,125   2,875 
Accounts payable  55,674   89,570 
Accrued expenses and other payables  13,633   16,661 
Dividend payable  2,062   5,120 
Income taxes payable  530   183 
   
         
Total current liabilities  74,903   116,489 
         
Deferred income taxes  78    
Long term bank loans - non-current portion  1,688   5,163 
   
         
Total liabilities  76,669   121,652 
   
         
Minority interests  3,908   33,768 
   
Commitments and contingencies      
         
Shareholders’ equity:        
Common shares (2004: $0.01 par value - authorized 200,000,000 shares)  412   426 
Additional paid-in capital  206,845   241,756 
Retained earnings  9,863   56,324 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income  (2)  6,547 
   
         
Total shareholders’ equity  217,118   305,053 
   
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $297,695  $460,473 
   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3F-4


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data)

                          
                   Accumulated Total
   Common Common Additional     Other Share
   Shares Shares Paid-in Retained Comprehensive holders’
   Outstanding Amount Capital Earnings Income (loss) Equity
   
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2001  30,641,520  $306  $105,936  $56,127  $(5) $162,364 
Share buy-back program  (683,700)  (6)     (3,347)     (3,353)
Shares issued on exercise of advisors’ warrants  900,000   9   3,066         3,075 
Shares issued on exercise of options  348,000   3   1,229         1,232 
Advisors’ warrants        263         263 
Issue of options (note 12b)        839         839 
Comprehensive income:                        
 Net income           9,045      9,045 
 Foreign currency translation              20   20 
Cash dividends ($0.13 per share)           (4,134)     (4,134)
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2001  31,205,820   312   111,333   57,691   15   169,351 
Share buy-back program  (592,800)  (6)     (3,522)     (3,528)
Share redemption  (509,181)  (5)     (3,120)     (3,125)
Shares issued on exercise of public warrants  4,381,965   44   29,753         29,797 
Shares issued on exercise of options  1,573,200   15   6,658         6,673 
Advisors’ options (note 12b)        10         10 
Comprehensive income:                        
 Net income           20,023      20,023 
 Foreign currency translation              (17)  (17)
Cash dividends ($0.49 per share, including special dividend of $0.33 per share)           (17,056)     (17,056)
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2002  36,059,004   360   147,754   54,016   (2)  202,128 
Shares issued on exercise of options  1,425,600   14   8,494         8,508 
Issue of stock dividend  3,746,668   38   50,333   (50,371)      
Compensation expense (note 3(b)(iv))        264         264 
Comprehensive income:                        
 Net income           43,802      43,802 
Cash dividends ($1.00 per share, including special dividend of $0.80 per share)           (37,584)     (37,584)
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2003  41,231,272   412   206,845   9,863   (2)  217,118 
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
                             
                  Accumulated  Total    
  Common  Common  Additional      Other  Share-    
  Shares  Shares  Paid-in  Retained  Comprehensive  holders’  Comprehensive 
  Outstanding  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Income (loss)  Equity  Income (loss) 
Balance at January 1, 2002  31,205,820  $312  $111,333  $57,691  $15  $169,351     
Share buy-back program  (592,800)  (6)     (3,522)     (3,528)    
Share redemption  (509,181)  (5)     (3,120)     (3,125)    
Shares issued on exercise of public warrants  4,381,965   44   29,753         29,797     
Shares issued on exercise of options  1,573,200   15   6,658         6,673     
Advisors’ options (note 11b)        10         10     
Net income           20,023      20,023  $20,023 
Foreign currency translation              (17)  (17)  (17)
                            
Comprehensive income                         $20,006 
                            
Cash dividends ($0.49 per share, including special dividend of $0.33 per share)           (17,056)     (17,056)    
       
                             
Balance at December 31, 2002  36,059,004   360   147,754   54,016   (2)  202,128     
Shares issued on exercise of options  1,425,600   14   8,494         8,508     
Issue of stock dividend  3,746,668   38   50,333   (50,371)          
Compensation expense (note 3(b)(iv))        264         264     
Net income           43,802      43,802  $43,802 
                            
Cash dividends ($1.00 per share, including special dividend of $0.80 per share)           (37,584)     (37,584)    
       
                             
Balance at December 31, 2003  41,231,272   412   206,845   9,863   (2)  217,118     
Shares issued on exercise of options  16,500      72         72     
Shares issued on acquisition of a subsidiary  2,389,974   24   58,769         58,793     
Cancellation of shares issued on acquisition of a subsidiary  (973,210)  (10)  (23,930)        (23,940)    
Net income           66,885      66,885  $66,885 
Unrealized gain of marketable securities              6,549   6,549   6,549 
                            
Comprehensive income                         $73,434 
                            
Cash dividends ($0.48 per share)           (20,424)     (20,424)    
       
Balance at December 31, 2004  42,664,536  $426  $241,756  $56,324  $6,547  $305,053     
       

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4F-5


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of US dollars)

               
    Year ended December 31,
    
    2001 2002 2003
    
 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
 Net income $9,045  $20,023  $43,802 
   
   
   
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
 Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment  9,136   10,397   12,172 
 Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets  2,035   222   92 
 Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment  378   977   (6)
 Loss on disposal of other assets     21    
 Loss on disposal of convertible notes        102 
 Unrealized gain on marketable securities - trading  (1,568)      
 Realized gain on marketable securities - trading     (642)   
 Impairment of goodwill - business acquired from Micro Business Systems Industries Company Limited (“MBS”)     339    
 Release of unamortized goodwill of an affiliated company - Mate Fair Group Limited (“Mate Fair”)     520    
 Gain on disposal of a subsidiary and related intangible assets - BPC (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd (“BPC”)     (77)   
 Gain on disposal of a subsidiary - Jieyao Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Jieyao”)        (1,979)
 Gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary - J.I.C. Technology Company Limited (“JIC Technology”)        (1,838)
 Loss on reverse merger of subsidiaries - J.I.C. Group (B.V.I.) Limited and its subsidiaries (“J.I.C. Group”)     2,655    
 Compensation cost on partial disposal of a subsidiary - Namtek Software Development Company Limited (“Namtek Software”)        509 
 Amortization of advisors’ warrants and options  263   10    
 Staff option costs  839       
 Share redemption and dividend withheld in settlement of a receivable - - Tele-Art, Inc. (“Tele-Art”)     (3,519)   
 Equity in income of affiliated companies less dividend received  (1,867)  (285)  (498)
 Deferred income taxes  117   (39)  (34)
 Minority interests  230   164   1,067 
 Changes in current assets and liabilities (net of effects of acquisitions and disposals):            
  Proceeds from marketable securities - trading     10,147    
  Increase in accounts receivable  (4,378)  (8,531)  (11,146)
  Increase in amount due from a related party        (2,707)
  Decrease (Increase) in inventories  15,302   (7,625)  (8,554)
  (Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other receivables  (620)  496   (6,130)
  Decrease (Increase) in income taxes recoverable  689   498   (4,067)
  Increase (Decrease) in notes payable  48   (562)  894 
  (Decrease) Increase in accounts payable  (4,952)  10,816   17,971 
  (Decrease) Increase in accrued expenses and other payables  (1,110)  6,151   1,189 
  (Decrease) Increase in income taxes payable  (354)  112   330 
  Increase (decrease) in amount due to a related party  2   (2,766)   
   
   
   
 
Total adjustments  14,190   19,479   (2,633)
   
   
   
 
Net cash provided by operating activities  23,235   39,502   41,169 
   
   
   
 
             
  Year ended December 31, 
  2002  2003  2004 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income $20,023  $43,802  $66,885 
   
             
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment  10,397   12,172   13,924 
Amortization of intangible assets  222   92   92 
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment  977   (6)  347 
Loss (gain) on disposal of other assets  21      (19)
Loss on disposal of convertible notes     102    
Loss on disposal of investment        67 
Realized gain on marketable securities - trading  (642)      
Impairment of goodwill - business acquired from Micro Business Systems Industries Company Limited (“MBS”)  339       
Unrealised loss on marketable securities TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited (“TCL Communication”)        58,316 
Release of unamortized goodwill of an affiliated company - Mate Fair Group Limited (“Mate Fair”)  520       
Gain on disposal of a subsidiary and related intangible assets - BPC (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd (“BPC”)  (77)      
Gain on disposal of a subsidiary - Jieyao Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Jieyao”)     (1,979)   
Gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary - J.I.C. Technology Company Limited (“JIC Technology”)     (1,838)  (6,249)
Gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary - Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (“NTEEP”)        (71,071)
Loss on reverse merger of subsidiaries - J.I.C. Group (B.V.I.) Limited and its subsidiaries (“JIC Group”)  2,655       
Compensation cost on transfer of interest in a subsidiary - Namtek Software Development Company Limited (“Namtek Software”)     509    
Amortization of advisors’ warrants and options  10       
Share redemption and dividend withheld in settlement of a receivable - - Tele-Art, Inc. (“Tele-Art”)  (3,519)      
Equity in (income) loss of affiliated companies less dividend received  (285)  (498)  6,806 
Dividend income        (15,913)
Deferred income taxes  (39)  (34)  (78)
Minority interests  164   1,067   6,010 
Changes in current assets and liabilities (net of effects of acquisitions and disposals):            
Proceeds from marketable securities - trading  10,147       
Increase in accounts receivable  (8,531)  (11,146)  (28,272)
(Increase) decrease in amount due from a related party     (2,707)  2,641 
(Increase) decrease in inventories  (7,625)  (8,554)  3,936 
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other receivables  496   (3,027)  2,654 
Decrease (increase) in income taxes recoverable  498   (4,067)  (1,644)
(Decrease) increase in notes payable  (562)  894   201 
Increase in accounts payable  10,816   17,971   33,896 
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables  6,151   1,189   3,028 
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable  112   330   (347)
Decrease in amount due to a related party  (2,766)      
   
Total adjustments  19,479   470   8,325 
   
             
Net cash provided by operating activities $39,502  $44,272  $75,210 
   

F-5F-6


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS. INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of US dollars)

              
   Year ended December 31,
   
   2001 2002 2003
   
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:            
 Purchase of property, plant and equipment - third parties  (35,963)  (18,485)  (17,053)
 Purchase of property, plant and equipment - related party  (50)      
 Prepayment for long term investment        (5,277)
 Increase in other assets  (38)  (25)  (24)
 Acquisition of an affiliated company - Alpha Star Investments Limited (“Alpha Star”)        (10,000)
 Acquisition of long term investments - TCL Corporation/ iMagic Infomedia Technology Limited     (11,968)  (384)
 (Acquisition) proceeds from disposal of convertible notes - TCL International Holdings Limited     (5,128)  5,026 
 Acquisition of additional shares in subsidiaries, net of cash acquired - - J.I.C. Group and Mate Fair  (85)  (436)   
 Proceeds from partial disposal of subsidiaries - JIC Technology and Namtek Software        4,165 
 Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment  698   628   2,595 
 Proceeds from disposal of a subsidiary, net of cash disposal of - Jieyao        2,386 
 Proceeds from disposal of a subsidiary and related intangible assets, net of cash disposal of - BPC     1,654    
   
   
   
 
Net cash used in investing activities  (35,438)  (33,760)  (18,566)
   
   
   
 
Cash flows from financing activities:            
 Cash dividends paid  (3,947)  (16,654)  (37,777)
 Share buy-back program  (3,353)  (3,528)   
 Repayment of bank loans     (2,703)  (13,984)
 Repayment of short term debt  (24)      
 Proceeds from bank loans  15,000   4,500    
 Proceeds from shares issued on exercise of options and warrants  4,307   36,470   8,508 
   
   
   
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  11,983   18,085   (43,253)
   
   
   
 
Effect of foreign currencies on cash flows     (26)   
   
   
   
 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (220)  23,801   (20,650)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  58,896   58,676   82,477 
   
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $58,676  $82,477  $61,827 
   
   
   
 
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:            
 Interest paid $178  $790  $121 
 Income taxes (received) paid, net $(249) $227  $4,183 
   
   
   
 
Non-cash financing transactions:            
 Share redemption and dividend withheld in settlement of a receivable - Tele-Art $  $3,519  $ 
   
   
   
 
             
  Year ended December 31, 
  2002  2003  2004 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Purchase of property, plant and equipment $(18,485) $(17,053) $(38,611)
Increase in deposits for property, plant and equipment     (3,103)  (4,374)
Prepayment for long term investment     (5,277)   
Increase in other assets  (25)  (24)  (37)
Acquisition of an affiliated company - Alpha Star     (10,000)   
Acquisition of long term investments - TCL Corporation/ iMagic Infomedia Technology Limited  (11,968)  (384)   
(Acquisition) proceeds from disposal of convertible notes - TCL International Holdings Limited  (5,128)  5,026    
Acquisition of additional shares in subsidiaries, net of cash acquired - - JIC Group and Mate Fair  (436)      
Acquisition of marketable securities - TCL Communication        (25,084)
Proceeds from partial disposal of subsidiaries - JIC Technology and Namtek Software/JIC Technology and NTEEP     4,165   95,449 
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment  628   2,595   4,546 
Proceeds from disposal of investment        5,609 
Proceeds from disposal of other assets        231 
Proceeds from disposal of a subsidiary, net of cash disposal of - Jieyao     2,386    
Proceeds from disposal of a subsidiary and related intangible assets, net of cash disposal of — BPC  1,654       
   
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (33,760)  (21,669)  37,729 
   
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Cash dividends paid  (16,654)  (37,777)  (19,414)
Share buy-back program  (3,528)      
Repayment of bank loans  (2,703)  (13,984)  (5,375)
Proceeds from bank loans  4,500      10,600 
Proceeds from shares issued on exercise of options and warrants  36,470   8,508   72 
   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  18,085   (43,253)  (14,117)
   
             
Effect of foreign currencies on cash flows  (26)      
   
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  23,801   (20,650)  98,822 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  58,676   82,477   61,827 
   
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $82,477  $61,827  $160,649 
   
             
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:            
Interest paid $790  $121  $195 
Income taxes paid, net  227   4,183   2,953 
   
             
Non-cash financing transactions:            
Share redemption and dividend withheld in settlement of a receivable - Tele-Art $3,519  $  $ 
   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6F-7


NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands of US dollars, except share and per share data)

1.Company Information
 
   Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Nam Tai”) is an electronics manufacturing and design services provider to a selected group of the world’s leading original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, of telecommunication and consumer electronic products. The Company’s largest customers include Epson Precision (HK) Ltd., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd.. Through its electronics manufacturing services, or EMS, operations, the Company manufactures electronic components and subassemblies, including liquid crystal display, or LCD, panels, transformers, LCD modules, radio frequency, or RF, modules, flexible printed circuit assembliessubassemblies and image sensors.sensors modules. These components are used in numerous electronic products, including cellular phones, laptop computers, digital cameras, copiers, fax machines, electronic toys, handheld video game devices and microwave ovens. The Company also manufactures finished products, including cellular phones, palm-sized PC’s, personal digital assistants, electronic dictionaries, calculators, and digital camera accessories and Bluetooth wireless headset accessory for use with cellular phones.
 
   The Company was founded in 1975 and moved its manufacturing facilities to the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) in 1980 to take advantage of lower overhead costs, lower material costs and competitive labor rates available and subsequently relocated to Shenzhen, PRC in order to capitalize on opportunities offered in Southern China. The Company was reincorporated as a limited liability International Business Company under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) in August 1987. The Company’s principal manufacturing and design operations are based in Shenzhen, the PRC, approximately 30 miles from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (“Hong Kong”). Its PRC headquarters are located in the Macao Special Administrative Region (“Macao”). Some of the subsidiaries’ offices are located in Hong Kong and Macao, which provides it access to Hong Kong’s and Macao’s infrastructure of communication and banking and facilitates management of its PRC operations and transportation of its products out of PRC through the port of Hong Kong.
The Company operates in two segments: consumer electronic products (“CEP”) and LCD panels and transformers (“LPT”). Through the disposal of a subsidiary, the Company discontinued its transformers operations, details of which are set out in note 3(b)(iii).operations. The Company’s principal manufacturing operations are conducted in the PRC. The PRC resumed sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macao effective July 1, 1997 and December 20, 1999, respectively, and politically Hong Kong and Macao are integral parts of China. However, for simplicity and as a matter of definition only, our references to PRC in these consolidated financial statements means the PRC and all of its territories excluding Hong Kong and Macao.
 
2.In 2004, Nam Tai’s operations were re-organized into three reportable segments consisting of consumer electronics and communication products (“CECP”), telecommunication components assembly (“TCA”) and LCD panels (“LCDP”). In 2003, CECP and TCA were classified as a single reportable segment as consumer electronic products (“CEP”) while LCDP also comprised the transformers operations and collectively referred to as LCD panels and transformers (“LPT”). Through the disposal of a subsidiary in 2003, the Company discontinued its transformers operations, details of which are set out in note 3(b)(iii).
 
2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 (a)Principles of consolidation
 
    The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and all its subsidiaries. The Company consolidates companies in which it has controlling interest of over 50%. All significant intercompany accounts, transactions and cash flows have been eliminated on consolidation.
 
    The equity method of accounting is used when the Company has the ability to exercise a significant influence over the operating and financial policies of an investee, which is normally indicated by a 20% to 50% interest in other entities. Under the equity method, original investments are recorded at cost and adjusted by the Company’s share of undistributed earnings or losses of these entities.entities and distributions received, if any.
 
    Non-marketable investments in which the Company has less than 20% interest and in which does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee are initially recorded at cost and periodically reviewed for impairment.
 
 (b)Cash and cash equivalents
 
    Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and certificates of deposit having a maturity date of three months or less upon acquisition.

F-7F-8


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

 (c)Marketable securities
 
    All marketableMarketable securities at December 31, 2004 are principally equity securities and are classified as trading securities andavailable-for-sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale are stated at fair market value. Market value is determined by the most recently traded price of the security at the balance sheet date. Net realized andwith unrealized gains and losses recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses on tradingthe sale of the available-for-sale securities are includeddetermined using the specific-identification method and are reflected in other income. The cost of securities sold is based on the average cost method and income earned is included in other income.(expenses).
 
 (d)Inventories
 
    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out basis. Write-downWrite down of potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory are recorded based on management’s analysis of inventory levels.
 
    For the Company’s CEPCECP and TCA reporting unit,units, the Company orders inventory from its suppliers based on firm customer orders for product that is unique to each customer. The inventory is utilized in production as soon as all the necessary components are received. The only reason that inventory would not be utilized within six months is if a specific customer deferred or cancelled an order. As the inventory is typically unique to each customer’s products, it is unusual for the Company to be able to utilize the inventory for other customers’ products. Therefore, the Company’s policy is to negotiate with the customer for the disposal of such inventory that remained unused for six months. The Company does not generally write down its inventories as usually, the customers are held to their purchase commitments. However, there are cases where customers are contractually obligated to purchase the unused inventory from the Company, but the Company may elect not to immediately enforce such contractual right for business reasons. In this connection, the Company will consider writing down these inventory items which remained unused for over six months at the Company’s own cost. Prior to writing down, management would determine if the inventory can be utilized in other products.
 
    For the Company’s LPTLCDP segment, due to the nature of the business, LPTLCDP customers do not always place orders advance enough to enable the Company to order inventory from suppliers based on firm customer orders. Nonetheless, management reviews its inventory balance on a regular basis and writewrites down all inventory over six months old.old if it is determined that the relevant inventory can not be utilized in the foreseeable future.
 
 (e)Property, plant and equipment
 
    Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and include interest on funds borrowed to finance construction. No interest was capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003.2004. The cost of major improvements and betterments is capitalized whereas the cost of maintenance and repairs is expensed in the year incurred. Assets under construction are not depreciated until construction is completed and the assets are ready for their intended use. Gains and losses for the disposal of leasehold land are included in other income (expenses) while gains and losses from the disposal of other property, plant and equipment are included in income from operations.
 
    The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based upon undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by such assets over their expected useful lives. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

F-8


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(e)Property, plant and equipment - continued
The majority of the land in Hong Kong is owned by the government of Hong Kong which leases the land at public auction to non-governmental entities. All of the Company’s leasehold land in Hong Kong have leases of not more than 50 years from the respective balance sheet dates. The cost of such leasehold land is amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective terms of the leases.
 
    All land in other regions of the PRC is owned by the PRC government. The government in the PRC, according to PRC law, may sell the right to use the land for a specified period of time. Thus all of the Company’s land purchases in the PRC are considered to be leasehold land and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the respective term of the right to use the land.
 
    Depreciation rates computed using the straight-line method are as follows:

    
Classification Years
Land use right, leasehold land and buildings 20 to 50 years
Machinery and equipment 4 to 12 years
Leasehold improvements 3 to 7 years
Furniture and fixtures 4 to 8 years
Automobiles 4 to 6 years
Tools and molds 4 to 6 years

F-9


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

 (f)Goodwill and licenses
 
    The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as goodwill. Prior to January 1, 2002, goodwill was amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over various periods ranging from 4 years to 15 years. Costs incurred in the acquisition of licenses are capitalized and amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the license period or 5 to 7 years.
 
    In June 2001,With effect from January 1, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (the “FASB”) issuedGroup adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. ThisUnder this statement provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives will not be amortized, but will be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level on at least an annual basis. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (i.e. a component) as defined in SFAS No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component. Through May 2002, the Company operated in two reporting units, which were its then operating segments of CEP and LPT. Beginning in June 2002, the Company segregated its then LPT segment into two reporting units: LCD panels and transformers. In June 2003, the Company disposed of its transformers operation through the disposal of a subsidiary, details of which are set out in note 3(b)(iii). Effective April 2004, the Company operated in three reporting units which were its reportable segments of CECP, TCA and LCDP.
 
    The evaluation of goodwill for impairment involves two steps: (1) the identification of potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill and (2) the measurement of the amount of goodwill loss by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill and recognizing a loss by the excess of the latter over the former.
SFAS No. 142 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company evaluated goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level and determined that there was no impairment at January 1, 2002. Later in 2002, the Company determined that goodwill was impaired by $339 related to the business acquired from MBS (see note 6). All remaining and future acquired goodwill will be subject to an annual impairment test on December 31 of each year or earlier if indications of a potential impairment exist. For future impairment tests, the Company will measure fair value based either on internal models or independent valuations. As of December 31, 2003, the Company completed its annual impairment evaluation and determined that there was no impairment in goodwill.

F-9


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

(f)Goodwill and licenses - continued
 
 (g)  The following transitional disclosure represents the Company’s reported and adjusted net income, basic earnings per share, and fully diluted earnings per share adding back amortization of goodwill beginning January 1, 2001:

             
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
Net income
            
As reported $9,045  $20,023  $43,802 
Add back: goodwill amortization  1,826       
   
   
   
 
As adjusted $10,871  $20,023  $43,802 
   
   
   
 
Basic earnings per share
            
As reported $0.27  $0.57  $1.09 
Add back: goodwill amortization  0.05       
   
   
   
 
As adjusted $0.32  $0.57  $1.09 
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share
            
As reported $0.26  $0.57  $1.07 
Add back: goodwill amortization  0.05       
   
   
   
 
As adjusted $0.31  $0.57  $1.07 
   
   
   
 

(g)Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets
 
    The Company reviews its long-lived assets for potential impairment based on a review of projected discountedundiscounted cash flows associated with these assets. Long-lived assets are included in impairment evaluations when events and circumstances exist that indicate the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of impairment losses for long-lived assets that the Company expects to hold and use is based on the estimated fair value of the assets.
 
    Long-lived assets to be disposed of are stated at the lower of fair value or carrying amount. Expected future operating losses from discontinued operations are recorded in the periods in which the losses are incurred.
 
 (h)Revenue recognition
 
    The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following conditions are met:

   Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
 
   Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered,
 
   Price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and
 
   Collectibility is reasonably assured.

    Revenue from sales of products is recognized when the title is passed to customers upon shipment and when collectibility is assured. The Company does not provide its customers with the right of return (except for quality), price protection, rebates or discounts. There are no customer acceptance provisions associated with the Company’s products, except for quality. All sales are based on firm customer orders with fixed terms and conditions, which generally cannot be modified.
The Company recognized revenue on its software development services in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition”. The Company’s software sales include neither multiple elements nor post-contract customer support.

F-10


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

 (i)Shipping and handling costs
 
    Shipping and handling costs are classified as to cost of sales for material purchased and selling expenses for those costs incurred in the delivery of finished products. During the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2003,2004, shipping and handling costs classified as costs of sales were $488, $536, $466 and $466,$536, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, shipping and handing costs classified as selling expenses were $954, $808, $870 and $870,$767, respectively.
 
 (j)Research and development costs
 
    Research and development costs relating toare incurred in the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products and are expensed as incurred.
 
 (k)Advertising expenses
 
    The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were $141, $528, $261 and $261$265 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, respectively.
 
 (l)Staff retirement plan costs
 
    The Company’s costs related to the staff retirement plans (see note 15)14) are charged to the consolidated statement of income as incurred.
 
 (m)Income taxes
 
    PRC tax paid by subsidiaries operating in the PRC during the year is recorded as an amount recoverable at the balance sheet date when management has filed or has the intention to file an application for reinvestment of profits and a refund is expected unless there is an indication from the PRC tax authority that the refund, or a portion of which, will be refused.
 
    Deferred income taxes are provided using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for all significant temporary differences and classified as current or non-current based upon the classification of the related asset or liability in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the amount of deferred tax assets if it is considered more likely than not that some portion of, or all, the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
 
 (n)Foreign currency transactions and translations
 
    All transactions in currencies other than functional currencies during the year are translated at the exchange rates prevailing on the respective transaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities existing at the balance sheet date denominated in currencies other than functional currencies are translatedremeasured at the exchange rates existing on that date. Exchange differences are recorded in the consolidated statement of income.
 
    The functional currencies of the Company and its subsidiaries have adoptedinclude the U.S. dollar, Hong Kong dollar or the Chinese Renminbi as their functional currencies.Renminbi. The financial statements of all subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the reporting currency, are translated in accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation”. All assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date and all income and expense items are translated at the average rates of exchange over the year. All exchange differences arising from the translation of subsidiaries’ financial statements are recorded as a component of comprehensive income.
 
    The exchange rate between the Hong Kong dollar and the U.S. dollar has been pegged (HK$7.80 to US$1.00) since October 1983.were approximately 7.7989,7.7643 and 7.7732 as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The exchange rate between the Chinese Renminbi and the U.S. dollar is based on the applicable rate of exchange quoted by the People’s Bank of China prevailing at the balance sheet date and were approximately 8.1500, 8.2773, 8.2767 and 8.27678.2765 as of December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2003,2004, respectively.

F-11


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

 (o)Earnings per share
 
    On June 20, 2003, the Company’s board of directors declared a 3-for-11 for 3 stock split of its outstanding common shares. Each shareholder of record on June 30, 2003 received two additional shares for each common share held at that date. In addition, the Company retained the current par value of $0.01 per share. Accordingly, all references to numbers of common shares, per share data and stock option data in the accompanying financial statements have been restated to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
 
    On October 24, 2003, the Company’s board of directors declared an issuance of stock dividend to shareholders at the ratio of one dividend share for every ten shares held by the shareholders of record on November 7, 2003. For the purposes of earnings per share calculation, all references to numbers of common shares and per share data have been restated to reflect this stock dividend.
 
    Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
 
    Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the year. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is adjusted to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued.
 
 (p)Stock options
 
    The Company does not recognize compensation expense for employee stock-based compensation if the strike-price is equal to or greater than the market price of the stock at the date of grant. The Company’s policy is to generally grant stock-based compensation to employees with a stock price equal to the market price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company continues to account for stock-based compensation arrangements under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”and provides additional financial statement disclosure in accordance with FASSFAS No. 123, “Accounting“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”Compensation". The Company recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based compensation granted to non-employees by estimating the fair value of the stock-based compensation utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. See note 12.11.
 
    The Company has two stock-based employee compensation plans, as more fully described in note 12(b)11(b). Stock-based employee compensation costs are not reflected in net income when options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. During 2001, the Company recorded compensation cost of $839 as 316,200 options granted under the plan had an exercise price less than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
 
    The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition.

              
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Net income, as reported $9,045  $20,023  $43,802 
Less: Stock based compensation costs under fair value based method for all awards  (2,331)  (1,491)  (582)
   
   
   
 
Net income, pro forma $6,714  $18,532  $43,220 
   
   
   
 
Basic earnings per share     As reported $0.27  $0.57  $1.09 
 Pro forma $0.20  $0.53  $1.07 
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share  As reported $0.26  $0.57  $1.07 
 Pro forma $0.20  $0.52  $1.06 
   
   
   
 
               
Year ended December 31,   2002  2003  2004 
Net income, as reported $20,023  $43,802  $66,885 
Less: Stock based compensation costs under fair value based method for all awards  (1,491)  (582)  (4,476)
     
Net income, pro forma   $18,532  $43,220  $62,409 
     
               
Basic earnings per share As reported $0.57  $1.09  $1.57 
  Pro forma $0.53  $1.07  $1,47 
     
               
Diluted earnings per share As reported $0.57  $1.07  $1.57 
  Pro forma $0.52  $1.06  $1.47 
     

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.123R,“Share-Based Payment”. This statement is a revision to SFAS 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 (see note 2(t)).

F-12


2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

 (q)Use of estimates
 
    The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
 (r)Comprehensive income
 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) represents unrealized gains on marketable securities and foreign currency translation adjustments and is included in the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity. The comprehensive income of the Company was $9,065, $20,006 and $43,802 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
 
 (s)Fair value disclosures
 
    The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amount due from a related party, prepaid expenses and other receivables, income taxes recoverable, notes payable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other payables dividend payable and income tax payable approximate their fair valuevalues due to the short term maturitynature of these instruments. The carrying amount of long term debt also approximates fair value due to the variable nature of the interest calculations. The fair value of the convertible notes is estimated based on the current rates offered to the Company for notes of similar terms and maturities.
 
 (t)Recent changes in accounting standards
 
    In January 2003,March 2004, the FASB issued Interpretation No.Emerging Issues Task Force (“FIN”EITF”) 46 (revised), reached a consensus in EITF 03-1,ConsolidationThe Meaning of Variable Interest EntitiesOther-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. FIN 46 (revised) requiresThe consensus was that if a business enterprisecertain quantitative and qualitative disclosures should be required for debt and marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS Nos. 115 and 124, that are impaired at the balance sheet date but for which an other-than-temporary impairment has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and resultsnot been recognized. This EITF consensus is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. Adoption of the activities of the variable interest entity should be includedEITF consensus did not result in consolidated financial statements of the business enterprise. FIN 46 (revised) applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 (revised) are effective beginning January 1, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 (revised) is not expected to have a materialan impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
    In April 2003,November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, 151,AmendmentsInventory Costs - an amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesARB No. 43, Chapter 4.””, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including derivatives embedded in other contracts and hedging activities. SFAS No. 149 amends151 clarifies the accounting that requires abnormal amounts of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs, and spoilage costs to be recognized as current-period charges. It also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 133 for decisions made by the FASB as part of its Derivatives Implementation Group process. SFAS No. 149 also amends SFAS No. 133 to incorporate clarifications of the definition of a derivative. SFAS No. 149 is151 will be effective for contracts entered intoinventory costs incurred on or modified and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003.July 1, 2005. The provisionsCompany is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impactthis standard on the Company’sits consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.statements.
 
    In May 2003,December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, 123R,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and EquityShare-Based Payment”. This statement is a revision to SFAS No. 150123 and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25. This statement establishes standards for howthe accounting for transactions in which an issuer classifiesentity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, primarily focusing on the accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. Entities will be required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service, the requisite service period (usually the vesting period), in exchange for the award. The grant-date fair value of employee share options and measures certain financialsimilar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models. If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. This statement is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. In accordance with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.the standard, the Company will adopt SFAS No. 150 requires123R effective July 1, 2005.
Upon adoption, the Company has two application methods to choose from: the modified-prospective transition approach or the modified-retrospective transition approach. Under the modified-prospective transition method the Company would be required to recognize compensation cost for share-based awards to employees based on their grant-date fair value from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied as well as compensation cost for awards that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scopewere granted prior to, but not vested as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances).of the date of adoption. Prior periods remain unchanged and pro forma disclosures previously required by SFAS No. 150123 continue to be required. Under the modified-retrospective transition method, the Company would restate prior periods by recognizing compensation cost in the amounts previously reported in the pro forma footnote disclosure under SFAS No. 123. Under this method, the Company is effectivepermitted to apply this presentation to all periods presented or to the start of the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 123R is adopted. The Company would follow the same guidelines as in the modified-prospective transition method for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003,awards granted subsequent to adoption and otherwise is effective forthose that were granted and not yet vested. The Company has not yet determined which methodology it will adopt but believes that the third quarter of 2003. Theimpact that the adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not123R will have a material impact on the Company’sits financial position or results of operations or cash flows.will approximate the magnitude of the stock-based employee compensation cost disclosed in Note 2 (p) pursuant to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148.

F-13


3.Investment in Subsidiaries

 (a)Subsidiaries

                  
           Percentage of ownership
   Place of Principal as of December 31
   incorporation activity 2002 2003
   
 
 
 
Consolidated principal subsidiaries:
                
J.I.C. Technology Company Cayman Islands Investment holding  74.78%*  74.86%*
 Limited                
J.I.C Enterprises (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Investment holding,  74.78%*  74.86%*
 Limited       manufacturing and        
        trading        
J.I.C. Electronics Company Hong Kong Inactive  74.78%*   
 Limited (deregistered in 2003)                
J.I.C. Group (B.V.I.) Limited BVI Inactive  74.78%*  74.86%*
Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) PRC Manufacturing  74.78%*  74.86%*
 Co., Limited                
Jieda Electronics (Shenzhen) PRC Inactive  74.78%*   
 Co., Ltd. (dissolved in 2003)                
Jieyao Electronics (Shenzhen) PRC Manufacturing  74.78%*   
 Co., Ltd.                
Nam Tai Investments Consultant Macao Provision of management     100%
 (Macao Commercial Offshore)       and sales co-ordination        
 Company Limited       and marketing services        
Nam Tai Group Management Hong Kong Provision of management  100%  100%
 Limited       services        
Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Cayman Islands Investment holding     100%
 Products Limited                
Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Hong Kong Investment holding and  100%  100%
 Products Limited       trading        
Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Cayman Islands Investment holding     100%
 Company Limited                
Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Hong Kong Investment holding and  100%  100%
 Company Limited       trading        
Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) PRC Manufacturing and  100%  100%
 Co., Ltd.       trading        
Namtek Japan Company Limited Japan Provision of sales     80%
        co-ordination and        
        marketing services        
Namtek Software Development Cayman Islands Investment holding  100%  80%
 Company Limited                
Shenzhen Namtek Co., Ltd. PRC Software development  100%  80%
Zastron Electronics (Shenzhen) PRC Manufacturing and  100%  100%
 Co. Ltd. (formerly known       trading        
 as Zastron Plastic & Metal Products (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.)                
Mate Fair Group Limited BVI Investment holding  72.22%  72.22%
             
      Percentage of ownership
  Place of Principal as at December 31
  incorporation activity 2003 2004
 
Consolidated principal subsidiaries:
            
             
Jasper Ace Limited (“Jasper Ace”) BVI Investment holding     100%
J.I.C. Technology Company Limited (“JIC Technology”) Cayman Islands Investment holding  74.86%*  71.63%
J.I.C Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited Hong Kong Manufacturing and trading**  74.86%*  71.63%
Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Limited (“Jetup”) PRC Manufacturing  74.86%*  71.63%
J.I.C. (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited Macao Trading of electronic components and the provision of marketing, management and technical consultancy services  -   71.63%
Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (“NTEEP”) Cayman Islands Investment holding  100%  75%
Nam Tai Group Management Limited Hong Kong Provision of management services  100%  100%
Nam Tai Investments Consultant
(Macao Commercial Offshore)
Company Limited
 Macao Provision of management and sales co-ordination and marketing services  100%  75%
Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong)
Company Limited
 Hong Kong Inactive  100%  100%
Nam Tai Trading Company Limited (“NTTC”, formerly known as Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited) Hong Kong Inactive  100%  100%
Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. PRC Manufacturing and trading  100%  75%
Namtek Japan Company Limited Japan Provision of sales co-ordination and marketing services  80%  80%
Namtek Software Development Company Limited (“Namtek Software”) Cayman Islands Investment holding  80%  80%
Shenzhen Namtek Company Ltd. PRC Software development  80%  80%
Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. PRC Manufacturing and trading  100%  100%
Zastron Precision-Tech Limited (“ZPTL”, formerly known as Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company Limited) Cayman Islands Investment holding  100%  100%
Zastron (Macao Commercial
Offshore) Company Limited
 Macao Provision of sales co-ordination and marketing services  -   100%
Mate Fair Group Limited BVI Investment holding  72.22% 


* Upon full conversion of the preference shares held by the Company, the Company would have an effective interest of 93.97% and 88.39% in these subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2003 respectively (see note 3(b)(ii)).
**Business ceased subsequent to December 31, 2004.

F-14


3.Investment in Subsidiaries - continued
3. Investment in Subsidiaries - continued

 (b)Significant transactions

 (i)  In March 2000, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (“NTEE”),NTTC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, together with Toshiba Battery Co., Ltd. (“TBCL”), established BPC, a wholly foreign owned enterprise in Shenzhen, PRC. NTEENTTC had a 86.67% interest in BPC and the investment cost of $1,300 was contributed in cash. BPC was located within the Company’s manufacturing complex where it produced and sold high-end, environmentally friendly, rechargeable lithium ion battery packs. Effective April 30, 2002, the Company sold its 86.67% joint venture interest in BPC to a TBCL related company for $2,131 resulting in a gain of $17. For the year ended December 31, 2001 and duringDuring the period from January 1, 2002 through April 30, 2002, the Company recognized net sales of $21,072 and $7,849 respectively, from TBCL and its related companies.
 
 (ii)In October 2000, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of J.I.C. Group (B.V.I.) Limited (“JIC”), a company incorporated in the BVI. The purchase price was the initial consideration of $32,776, less a purchase price adjustment based on earnings. The initial consideration was satisfied by a cash consideration of $10,981 and the issuance of 3,483,261 shares in the Company at $6.26 each, being the average market closing price as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”, the then stock market in which the Company’s stock was traded) for each day during the period from September 26, 2000 to October 24, 2000 (inclusive) on which Nasdaq was open for trading and on which at least 30,000 shares were traded. J.I.C Group are principally engaged in the manufacture and trading of LCD panels and transformers. Their production base is located at Shenzhen and Bao An, which are used by three subsidiaries of JIC namely, Jieda Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Jieda”), Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Jetup”) and Jieyao, all being wholly foreign owned enterprises in the PRC. During 2003, Jieda merged with Jieyao and in June 2003, J.I.C. Group disposed of its entire interest in Jieyao, which was principally engaged in the manufacturing and sale of transformers, as a result of concentration of its effort on its LCD panels business unit. A profit of approximately $1,979, net of minority interests, arose as a result of this disposition (see note 3 (b)(iii)).
The purchase price adjustment based on earnings is the amount of shortfall, if any, between the net income of the J.I.C. Group for the year ended March 31, 2001 and the guaranteed profit amount of $3,846, multiplied by 8.5. As the net income of the J.I.C. Group for the year ended March 31, 2001 met this guaranteed profit requirement, no adjustment to the purchase price was made.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the results of the J.I.C. Group have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the net assets acquired of $10,002 was $22,774 and had been recorded as goodwill which was being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. Upon the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 142, the goodwill is no longer being amortized (see note 2(f)). During 2001, the Company incurred legal and professional fees of $85 to complete the acquisition of JIC which was adjusted to goodwill.

F-15


3.Investment in Subsidiaries - continued

(b)Significant transactions - continued

(ii) - continued
  In June 2002, through a reverse merger, the Company arranged for the listing of the J.I.C.JIC Group (B.V.I.) Limited and its subsidiaries (the “JIC Group”) on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.Limited (the “SEHK”). To effect the listing, the Company entered an agreement with the liquidators of Albatronics (Far East) Company Limited (“Albatronics”), whose shares had been listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limitedthe SEHK and which was placed into voluntary liquidation in August 1999. The Company owned slightly more than 50% of the outstanding capital stock of Albatronics. Under the agreement, the Company agreed to transfer the J.I.C.JIC Group into JIC Technology, a new company, for a controlling interest in JIC Technology. Prior to it being placed into voluntary liquidation, Albatronics and its subsidiaries were engaged in the trading of electronic components and manufacturing of consumer electronics products. Due to the troubled financial condition of Albatronics at December 31, 1998, it was probable that the Company would never be in a position to exercise control over Albatronics as such control would rest with the creditors of Albatronics. Accordingly, the Company did not consolidate Albatronics’ financial statements at December 31, 1998, for the year then ended or for any subsequent period. As of December 31, 1999 the investment was written off. On February 1, 2000, the Company received an invitation soliciting offers for the rescue or restructuring of Albatronics from Albatronics’ liquidators. In June 2002, Albatronics’ listing status on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limitedthe SEHK was withdrawn and JIC Technology was listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limitedthe SEHK free from the liabilities of Albatronics. For the Company’s contribution to JIC Technology, the Company received a combination of ordinary and preference shares, which are analogous to common stock and convertible preferred stock, respectively, of companies organized under U.S. law. The Company, the creditors of Albatronics and the Hong Kong public who held shares of Albatronics received ordinary shares of JIC Technology equal to approximately 70.4%, 24.1% and 5.5%, respectively, of the outstanding ordinary shares of JIC Technology. The Company also received preference shares of JIC Technology, which upon their full conversion, would result in the Company, the creditors and the Hong Kong public owning approximately 92.9%, 5.8% and 1.3%, respectively, of the outstanding ordinary shares of JIC Technology. On June 4, 2002, the reverse merger was completed and all the shares of Albatronics were transferred to the liquidators for a nominal consideration. The then preference shares arewere non-redeemable, non-voting shares that rankranked pari passu with ordinary shares of JIC Technology on the payment of dividends or other distribution other than on a winding-up. No holder of preference shares (including the Company) may convert them if such conversion would result in the minimum public float of 25% that is required under the Hong Kong Stock Exchange listing rules not being met.
 
    Due to the reverse merger, the Company’s effective interest in the J.I.C.JIC Group reduced from 100% to 92.9%. As a result of this reduction in interest during 2002, the Company has released unamortized goodwill of $1,483, representing 7.1% of the goodwill that had previously been recorded upon purchasing the J.I.C.JIC Group in October 2000. The release of unamortized goodwill is included as part of the loss on reverse merger of the J.I.C. Group.JIC Group of $2,655.

F-15


3.Investment in Subsidiaries - continued

(b)Significant transactions - continued
 
 (ii)- continued

    In August 2002, the Company acquired an additional 7,984,000 ordinary shares of JIC Technology for a cash consideration of $437, resulting in additional goodwill of $253. As of December 31, 2002, the Company held 93.97% effective interest in J.I.C. Group, which represented 74.78% of the existing ordinary shares and 93.97% of the outstanding ordinary shares upon full conversion of the preference shares.
 
    During the period from June to November 2003, the Company disposed of totally 42,600,000 ordinary shares of JIC Technology for cash considerations of $4,005. The disposal resulted in a net gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary of $1,838 andafter deducting the releasing of unamortized goodwill of $1,171. The release of unamortized goodwill is netted off with the gain on the partial disposal of a subsidiary. In November 2003, the Company converted 175,100,000 preference shares into 170,000,000 ordinary shares of JIC Technology. As ofat December 31, 2003, the Company held 263,900,688 ordinary shares of JIC Technology, equivalent to 74.86% of issued ordinary shares, and 423,320,000 preference shares. Upon full conversion of the preference shares owned, the Company would have held approximately 88.39% of JIC Technology.Technology as of December 31, 2003.

F-16


3.
   InvestmentIn November and December 2004, the Company disposed of totally 128,000,000 ordinary shares of JIC Technology for cash considerations of $12,902. The disposal resulted in Subsidiaries - continueda net gain on partial disposal of a subsidiary of $6,249 after deducting the releasing of unamortized goodwill of $3,518. The Company also converted all outstanding preference shares into 313,902,912 ordinary shares of JIC Technology resulting in 71.63% equity interest held in JIC Technology as of December 31, 2004.

 (b)Significant transactions - continued

 (iii)  In order to concentrate its effort on its LCD panels reporting unit, in June 2003, JIC Technology disposed its transformers reporting unit to a third party for a cash consideration of $2,426. Sales of the transformers reporting unit for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 were $10,981, $11,324 and $6,284, respectively, and were insignificant comparing to the sales of the Company as a whole. The income from operations of the transformers reporting unit was less than 5%, 3% and 1% of the Company’s income from operations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The transformers reporting unit had no non-operating income or expenses for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003.

The proceeds from the disposal exceeded the carrying value of the net assets of the transformers reporting unit, resulting in a gain from discontinued operation, net of minority interests, in 2003 of $1,979.

The carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of the transformers businessreporting unit at the date of disposal arewere as follows:
Net assets disposed of:

Net assets disposed of:

     
Property, plant and equipment $559 
Cash  40 
Other assets  870 
Liabilities  (1,176)
    
Total $293 
    

 (iv)  In January 2003, the Company disposed of 20% of its equity interest in Namtek Software to a company which is owned by the management of Namtek Software for a cash consideration of $160. As of the date of disposal, Namtek Software was fair valued at $3,347. Accordingly, a charge to compensation expense of $509 and a credit to additional paid-in capital of $264 (being the difference between the net asset value and fair value of Namtek Software disposed) resulted.

F-16


3.Investment in Subsidiaries - continued

 (b)Significant transactions - continued

 (v)  In September 2000, the Company acquired a 5% indirect shareholding in both Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. (“Huizhou TCL”) and TCL Mobile Communication (HK) Co., Ltd. (collectively “TCL Mobile”) through the acquisition of 25% of the outstanding shares of Mate Fair, a privately held investment holding company incorporated in the BVI with a 20% shareholding interest in TCL Mobile. TCL Mobile is engaged in manufacturing, distributing and trading of digital mobile phones and accessories in the PRC as well as overseas markets. The acquisition in Mate Fair was satisfied by cash consideration of approximately $2,036. The 25% share of the net book value of Mate Fair on that date was approximately $511. Goodwill of approximately $1,525 was recorded by the Company and was initially being amortized on a straight linestraight-line basis over 10 years fromstarting in September 2000 to August 2010. The amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $153.2000.
 
    In May 2002, due to the increase of capital in Huizhou TCL, Mate Fair’s direct interest in Huizhou TCL was diluted from 20% to 18% and accordingly, the Company’s 5% indirect interest in Huizhou TCL was diluted to 4.5%. As a result of the dilution, the Company recognized the release of unamortized goodwill of approximately $132 and the share of Mate Fair’s loss on deemed disposal of Huizhou TCL of approximately $336 as part of the equity in income of affiliated companies. Mate Fair ceased the equity method of accounting for Huizhou TCL since it no longer held at least a 20% interest in Huizhou TCL. In late 2002, TCL Mobile Communications (HK) Co., Ltd. was acquired by Huizhou TCL.
 
    On November 11, 2002, through a series of linked transactions, the Company effectively exchanged its 4.5% indirect interest in Huizhou TCL for a 3.033% direct interest plus cash consideration. This was accomplished by Mate Fair selling a 13.8% equity interest in Huizhou TCL for $10,424, which resulted in a gain of $9,022 that was included in equity in income of affiliated companies. Also, as part of these linked transactions, the Company increased its shareholding in Mate Fair from 25% to 72.22% for $3 by the subscription of additional 3,028 shares in Mate Fair, and recognized an additional release of unamortized goodwill of approximately $388. The Company invested $5,128 of the proceeds in TCL International Holdings Limited 3% convertible notes (see note 9(a)).
In April 2004, the Company increased its equity interest in Huizhou TCL to 9% through exchange of its existing 72.2% interest in Mate Fair, which had a 3.033% equity interest in Huizhou TCL, and acquiring the entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace, a holding company with no operations, which directly holds 9% equity interest in Huizhou TCL. The acquisition was satisfied by the exchange of the Company’s 72.2% equity interest in Mate Fair, cash of $25,000, and 1,416,764 new shares in the Company upon a pricing adjustment in July 2004 resulting in the cancellation of 973,210 shares of the Company previously issued as part of the purchase consideration.
(vi)  In April 2004, one of the then wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, NTEEP, completed public offering of its common stock on the SEHK in which the Company disposed of a 25% interest in this subsidiary resulting in a gain on partial disposal of US$71,071.

F-17


3.Investment in Subsidiaries - continued

 (c)Establishment of subsidiaries

 (i)In May 2002, the Company established Namtek Software, a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the Cayman Islands, at an investment cost of $800. It is an investment holding company of Shenzhen Namtek Company Limited (“Shenzhen Namtek”).
(ii)  In June 2003, Namtek Software established Namtek Japan Company Limited, a subsidiary incorporated in Japan, at an investment cost of $85. Its principal activity is sales co-ordination and marketing of software.
 
 (iii)(ii)  In June 2003, the Company established two wholly-owned subsidiaries, namely Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company LimitedZPTL and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited,NTEEP, incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Their principal activity is to act as investment holding companies.
 
 (iv)(iii)  In August 2003, the Company established Nam Tai Investments Consultant (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in Macao, at an investment cost of $13. Its principal activity is provision of consultancy services to other group companies, and to act as the Company’s PRC headquarters due to the continuous increase in investment in China.

 (d)(iv)  Retained earningsIn March 2004, the ZPTL established Zastron (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited, a subsidiary incorporated in Macao, at an investment cost of $13. Its principal activity is provision of sales co-ordination and marketing activities to group companies.
 
 (v)  In November 2004, J.I.C. Technology established J.I.C. (Macao Commercial Offshore) Company Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in Macao, at an investment cost of $13. Its principal activity is trading of electronic components, and the provision of marketing, management and technical consultancy services.

(d)Retained earnings
    Retained earnings are not restricted as to the payment of dividends except to the extent dictated by prudent business practices. The Company believes that there are no material restrictions, including foreign exchange controls, on the ability of its non-PRC subsidiaries to transfer surplus funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans, advances or purchases. With respect to the Company’s PRC subsidiaries, there are restrictions on the purchase of materials by these companies, the payment of dividends and the removal of dividends from the PRC. In the event that dividends are paid by the Company’s PRC subsidiaries, such dividends will reduce the amount of reinvested profits and accordingly, the refund of taxes paid will be reduced to the extent of tax applicable to profits not reinvested. However, the Company believes that such restrictions will not have a material effect on the Company’s liquidity or cash flows. In addition, pursuant to the PRC regulations, a certain portion of the profits made by these subsidiaries must be set aside for future capital investment and are not distributable, and amounted to $400 and $6,164 as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 respectively.

4.Inventories
 
   Inventories consist of the following:

         
At December 31, 2002 2003

 
 
Raw materials $15,719  $17,448 
Work-in-progress  1,937   4,534 
Finished goods  1,544   5,050 
   
   
 
  $19,200  $27,032 
   
   
 
         
At December 31, 2003  2004 
Raw materials $17,448  $19,815 
Work-in-progress  4,534   1,578 
Finished goods  5,050   1,703 
   
  $27,032  $23,096 
   

5.Property, Plant and Equipment, net
 
   Property, plant and equipment, net consist of the following:

         
At December 31, 2002 2003

 
 
At cost        
Land use right, leasehold land and buildings $41,938  $47,777 
Machinery and equipment  51,648   61,417 
Leasehold improvements  10,237   12,506 
Furniture and fixtures  1,646   1,967 
Automobiles  1,536   1,432 
Tools and molds  77   132 
   
   
 
Total  107,082   125,231 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (40,669)  (50,283)
Construction in progress  9,501   2,699 
   
   
 
Net book value $75,914  $77,647 
   
   
 
         
At December 31, 2003  2004 
At cost        
Land use right, leasehold land and buildings $47,777  $45,499 
Machinery and equipment  61,417   80,479 
Leasehold improvements  12,506   15,226 
Furniture and fixtures  1,967   2,026 
Automobiles  1,432   1,427 
Tools and molds  132   196 
   
Total  125,231   144,853 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (50,283)  (60,706)
Construction in progress  2,699   13,294 
   
Net book value $77,647  $97,441 
   

   As ofat December 31, 2003,2004, the Company has entered into commitments for capital expenditure for property, plant and equipment of approximately $34,161,$17,080, which are expected to be disbursed during the year ending December 31, 2004.2005.

F-18


6.Goodwill
 
   Goodwill consists of the following:

              
       LPT    
   CEP Segment    
   Segment (LCD    
   (reporting reporting    
   unit) unit) Total
   
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2002 $339  $21,750  $22,089 
Goodwill acquired during the year:            
 Additional goodwill of JIC Technology (see note 3(b)(ii))     253   253 
 Additional goodwill of Mate Fair  788      788 
Impairment of goodwill on business acquired from MBS  (339)     (339)
Goodwill release related to disposition of 7.1% interest in J.I.C. Group
(see note 3(b)(ii))
     (1,483)  (1,483)
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2002 $788  $20,520  $21,308 
Goodwill release related to disposition of 5.58% interest in JIC Technology
(see note 3(b)(ii))
     (1,171)  (1,171)
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2003 $788  $19,349  $20,137 
   
   
   
 
             
  CECP  LCDP    
  Segment  Segment    
  (reporting  (reporting    
  unit)  unit)  Total 
Balance at January 1, 2003 $788  $20,520  $21,308 
Goodwill release related to disposition of 5.58% interest in JIC Technology (see note 3(b)(ii))     (1,171)  (1,171)
   
Balance at December 31, 2003 $788  $19,349  $20,137 
Goodwill release related to disposition of 16.76% interest in JIC Technology     (3,518)  (3,518)
Goodwill release related to disposition of 72.22% interest in Mate Fair  (788)     (788)
   
Balance at December 31, 2004 $  $15,831  $15,831 
   

   No goodwill has been assigned to the “transformer” reporting unit of the previous LPT Segment as the Company’s purchase of the J.I.C.JIC Group was exclusively for the “LCD panel” reporting unit.
 
   The Company acquired certain net assets from MBS, a telecommunication business including the design, research and development, and marketing of telecommunication products. The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the assets acquired was $776 and was recorded as goodwill which was being amortized on a straight-line basis over 4 years. In 2002, the Company determined that the previously acquired technology had become obsolete. Therefore, the Company recorded an impairment for the remaining goodwill of $339 and accelerated the amortization of the license fees (included in intangible assets) by $173.
 
7.Intangible Assets, net
 
   Amortized intangible assets, net consist of the following:

         
At December 31, 2002 2003

 
 
Gross carrying amount of licenses $1,335  $643 
Accumulated amortization  (586)  (92)
Disposal (see note 17)  (749)   
   
   
 
Net carrying amount $  $551 
   
   
 
         
At December 31, 2003  2004 
Gross carrying amount of licenses $643  $643 
Accumulated amortization  (92)  (184)
   
Net carrying amount $551  $459 
   

   Amortization expense charged to income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 20032004 was $209, $222, $92 and $92, respectively. Amortization expense on intangible assets for each of the next five years is as follows:

      
Year ending December 31,    
 - 2004 $92 
 - 2005  92 
 - 2006  92 
 - 2007  92 
 - 2008  92 
   
 
Total $460 
   
 
     
Year ending December 31,    
- 2005 $92 
- 2006  92 
- 2007  92 
- 2008  92 
- 2009  91 
    
Total $459 
    

F-19


8. Investment in Affiliated Companies, Equity Method

The Company’s investments accounted for under the equity method are disclosed below. The Company has not made any loans or guarantees or has any contingent liabilities with these companies.

Mate Fair

Mate Fair was accounted as an affiliated company until November 11, 2002. Details of the investment in Mate Fair are set out in note 3(b)(v).

Alpha Star

In January 2003, the Company further expanded its business to include wireless communication technology and related products. The Company made a strategic investment of $10,000 by subscribing for a 25% shareholding in Alpha Star, a BVI company, which is the ultimate holding company of JCT Wireless Technology Company Limited (“JCT”), a company engaged in the design, development and marketing of wireless communication terminals and wireless application software. The Company also manufactures wireless communication terminals and related modules for JCT. As part of the agreement, Alpha Star agreed to purchase from the Company at least 50 percent of the orders it, or any of its subsidiaries, receives for RF modules provided the Company performs such manufacturing services at a price comparable to the market. The fair value of this arrangement was estimated to be $643 and is included in the consolidated balance sheet as an intangible asset (note 7). The Company had one representative on Alpha Star’s board of directors until his resignation in July 2004.

The Company initially recorded goodwill of approximately $5,596 as a result of the acquisition of Alpha Star. The Company recorded $498 on equity in earning of Alpha Star for 2003 but recognized an equity in loss of $1,210 for 2004. In the third quarter of 2004, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary cash impairment charge of approximately $5,596 to write-down its investment in Alpha Star upon careful assessment of various factors relevant to the affiliate, including the competitive handset market in the PRC.

As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, JCT owed the Company $2,707 and $66. For the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company recognized net sales of $20,782 and $34,181 to JCT and purchased raw materials of $5,456 and $12,398 from JCT and its related companies, respectively.

9. Investments

Investments in TCL

The Company had various investments in TCL Group of companies in the form of convertible notes, and available for sale marketable securities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company disposed of the convertible notes. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the investments at cost became marketable securities upon the listing of these investments on public stock exchanges. The Company has not incurred any material operating revenue or expenses from the TCL Group of companies, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004.

8.(a)  Investment in Affiliated Companies, Equity MethodConvertible Notes

On November 11, 2002, in connection with its disposal of 1.467% indirect interest in Huizhou TCL (see note 3(b)(v)) for approximately $10,424, the Company purchased $5,128 in 3% convertible notes (“CB Note”) due in November 2005 of TCL International Holdings Limited, a company publicly listed on the SEHK. In August 2003, the CB Note was disposed of by the Company for a consideration of $5,026, resulting in a loss of $102.

F-20


9. Investments — continued

 (b)  The Company’s investments accountedInvestments, at cost/available for under the equity method are disclosed below. The Company has not made any loans or guarantees or has any contingent liabilities with these companies.
Mate Fair
Mate Fair was accounted as an affiliated company upto November 11, 2002. Details of thesale investment in Mate Fair are set out in note 3(b)(v).
Alpha Star
In January 2003, the Company further expanded its business to include wireless communication technology and related products. The Company made a strategic investment of $10,000 by subscribing for a 25% shareholding in Alpha Star, a BVI company, which is the ultimate holding company of the JCT Wireless Technology Company Limited (“JCT”), a company engaged in the design, development and marketing of wireless communication terminals and wireless application software. The Company also manufactures wireless communication terminals and related modules for JCT. As part of the agreement, Alpha Star agreed to purchase from the Company at least 50 percent of the orders it, or any of its subsidiaries, receives for RF modules provided the Company performs such manufacturing services at a price comparable to the market. The fair value of this arrangement was estimated to be $643 and is included in the consolidated balance sheet as an intangible asset (note 7). The Company has one representative on Alpha Star’s board of directors.
The Company has recorded goodwill of approximately $5,596 as a result of the acquisition of Alpha Star. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded $498 in equity in earning of Alpha Star.
As of December 31, 2003, JCT owed the Company $2,707. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recognized net sales of $20,782 to JCT and purchased raw materials of $5,456 from JCT and its related companies.
9.Investments in TCL
The Company had three investments in TCL Group of companies in the form of convertible notes and investments at cost. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company disposed of the convertible notes. The Company has not incurred any material operating revenue or expenses from the TCL Group of companies, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003.securities

 (a)(i)Convertible NotesTCL Corporation

In January 2002, the Company acquired a 6% equity interest in TCL Holdings Corporation Ltd., now known as TCL Corporation, for a consideration of $11,968. TCL Corporation, an enterprise established in the PRC, is the parent company of the TCL Group of companies. TCL Corporation’s scope of business includes the import and export of raw materials, the design, manufacturing and sales and marketing of telephones, VCD players, color television sets, mobile phones and other consumer electronic products. TCL Corporation changed from a limited liability company to a company limited by shares in April 2002 (the “Establishment Date”).

In January 2004, TCL Corporation listed its A-shares on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange at RMB4.26 (equivalent to US$0.52) per A-share. The Company’s interest in TCL Corporation has then been diluted to 3.69% and represents 95.52 million promoter’s shares of TCL Corporation after its initial public offering. According to Article 147 of the Company Law of the PRC, the Company is restricted to transfer its promoter’s shares within three years from the Establishment Date. The Company is, however, entitled to dividend and other rights similar to the holders of A-shares.

As these promoter’s shares have a restriction on their sale prior to April 2005, the Company hired a third party valuation firm to determine the fair value of these shares as of December 31, 2004 and recognized an unrealized gain of $6,549 based on the Company’s cost of $11,968 and an estimated fair value of $20,700.

 (ii)  On November 11, 2002, in connection with its disposal of 1.467% indirect interest in Huizhou TCL (see note 3(b)(v)) for approximately $10,424, the Company purchased $5,128 in 3% convertible notes (“CB Note”) due in November 2005 of TCL International Holdings Limited, a publicly listed company on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. In August 2003, the CB Note was disposed of by the Company for a consideration of $5,026, resulting in a loss of $102.

The Company had a 3.033% direct interest in Huizhou TCL. As described in note 3(b)(v), the Company increased its equity interest in Huizhou TCL to 9%. In August 2004, as part of the preparation for TCL Communication’s public offering on SEHK, the shares in Huizhou TCL were exchanged for the shares in TCL Communication. In September 2004, TCL Communication’s public offering was completed. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s investment in TCL Communication is stated at fair value based on the traded market price of TCL Communication’s shares and recognized an unrealized loss of $58,316 based on the Company’s cost of $79,522 and a fair value of $21,206.

 (b)Investments, at costInvestment in Stepmind

 (i)TCL Corporation
 In January 2002,December 2003, the Company acquired a 6% equity interestpaid approximately $5,277 (Euros 4,250) into an escrow account for an investment in TCL Holdings Corporation Ltd, now known as TCL Corporation, for a consideration of $11,968. TCL Corporation, an enterprise establishedStepmind, which was included in the PRC, is the parent company of the TCL Group of companies. TCL Corporation’s scope of business includes the import and export of raw materials, the design, manufacturing and sales and marketing of telephones, VCD players, color television sets, mobile phonesprepaid expenses and other consumer electronic products. TCL Corporation changed from a limited liability company to a company limited by shares in April 2002 (the “Establishment Date”).
In January 2004, TCL Corporation listed its A-shares on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange at RMB4.26 (equivalent to US$0.52) per A-share. The Company’s interest in TCL Corporation has then been diluted to 3.69% and represents 95.52 million promoter’s shares of TCL Corporation after its initial public offering. According to Article 147 of the Company Law of the PRC, the Company is restricted to transfer its promoter’s shares within three years from the Establishment Date. The Company is, however, entitled to dividend and other rights similar to the holders of A-shares.
The Company may re-consider its investment strategy in these promotor’s shares after the end of restriction period in April 2005.
(ii)Huizhou TCL
The Company has a 3.033% direct interest in Huizhou TCL through the Company’s subsidiary, Mate Fair (see note 3(b)(v)). This investment at cost is $4,014receivables at December 31, 2003. Approximately $2,646 (Euros 2,122) was released from the escrow account in January 2004 for the Company’s first phase of investment and was included in investments. In August 2004, the remaining balance in the escrow account was released. In the same month, the Company disposed of its entire interest in Stepmind to one of the shareholders of Stepmind at the original subscription price. As a result, a loss of $67, representing the legal and administrative costs incurred, was noted.

F-20F-21


10. Bank Loans and Banking Facilities

10.Investment in iMagic
On January 20, 2003, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, JIC Technology, entered into a subscription agreement with iMagic Infomedia Technology Limited (“iMagic”) pursuant to which JIC Technology agreed to subscribe for 60 shares of par value of HK$1 each in iMagic, representing 5.36% of the total issued capital of iMagic, for cash consideration of $384. On the same date, JIC Technology also entered into a deed of put option with a director of iMagic under which the director of iMagic granted JIC Technology an option to require the director to purchase the shares from JIC Technology at the original consideration of $384. The put option shall be exercisable on December 31, 2004 and expire on January 30, 2005. iMagic, a privately held company, is the parent company of PowerPhone Network Limited, a company that has deployed interactive multimedia voice and data terminals in Asia and the United States.
11.Bank Loans and Banking Facilities
The Company has credit facilities with various banks representing notes payable, trade acceptances, import facilities and overdrafts. At December 31, 2002 and 2003, these facilities totaled $58,244 and $62,256, of which $8,889 and $8,309 were utilized at December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The maturity of these facilities is generally up to 90 days. Interest rates are generally based on the banks’ usual lending rates in Hong Kong and the credit lines are normally subject to annual review. The banking facilities are secured by guarantees given by Nam Tai and certain subsidiaries and restrict the pledge of assets to any other banks without the prior consent of the Company’s bankers.
The notes payable, which include trust receipts and shipping guarantees, may not agree to utilized banking facilities due to a timing difference between the Company receiving the goods and the bank issuing the trust receipt to cover financing of the purchase. The Company recognizes the outstanding letter of credit as a note payable when the goods are received, even though the bank may not have issued the trust receipt. However, this will not affect the total bank facility utilization, as an addition to the trust receipts will be offset by a reduction in the same amount of outstanding letters of credit.

         
At December 31, 2002 2003

 
 
Outstanding letters of credit $7,904  $6,430 
Trust receipts  908   1,531 
Usance bills pending maturity  57   348 
Documents in transit  20    
   
   
 
Total banking facilities utilized  8,889   8,309 
Less: Outstanding letters of credit  (7,904)  (6,430)
   
   
 
Notes payable $985  $1,879 
   
   
 
The Company has credit facilities with various banks representing notes payable, trade acceptances, import facilities and overdrafts. At December 31, 2003 and 2004, these facilities totaled $62,256 and $87,923, of which $53,947 and $84,495 were unused at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The maturity of these facilities is generally up to 90 days. Interest rates are generally based on the banks’ usual lending rates in Hong Kong and the credit lines are normally subject to annual review. The banking facilities are secured by guarantees given by Nam Tai and certain subsidiaries and restrict the pledge of assets to any other banks without the prior consent of the Company’s bankers.

The notes payable, which include trust receipts and shipping guarantees, may not agree to utilized banking facilities due to a timing difference between the Company receiving the goods and the bank issuing the trust receipt to cover financing of the purchase. The Company recognizes the outstanding letter of credit as a note payable when the goods are received, even though the bank may not have issued the trust receipt. However, this will not affect the total bank facility utilization, as an addition to the trust receipts will be offset by a reduction in the same amount of outstanding letters of credit.

         
At December 31, 2003  2004 
   
Outstanding letters of credit $6,430  $1,348 
Trust receipts  1,531   1,257 
Usance bills pending maturity  348   823 
   
Total banking facilities utilized  8,309   3,428 
Less: Outstanding letters of credit  (6,430)  (1,348)
   
Notes payable $1,879  $2,080 
   

A subsidiary of the Company has an unsecured four-year term loan with borrowings in May 2002 totaling $4,500 at a rate of 1.5% p.a. over three months London Interbank Offered Rate, repayable in 16 quarterly instalments of approximately $281 beginning August 31, 2002. The interest rate was reduced to 0.75% p.a. over three months London Interbank Offered Rate in 2004. During the year 2004, it has obtained another unsecured four-year term loan totaling $7,000 at a rate of 0.75% p.a. over three months London Interbank Offered Rate, repayable in 16 quarterly instalments of $438 beginning in July 2004. At December 31, 2004, the loans had outstanding balances of $8,038. There are no restrictive financial covenants associated with these term loans.

The long term debts are repayable as follows for the years ending December 31

     
- 2005 $2,875 
- 2006  2,313 
- 2007  1,750 
- 2008  1,100 
    
  $8,038 
    

11. Shareholders’ Equity

 A subsidiary of the Company has an unsecured four-year term loan with borrowings in May 2002 totaling $4,500 at a rate of 1.5% over three months London Interbank Offered Rate, repayable in 16 quarterly instalments of approximately $281 beginning August 31, 2002. At December 31, 2003, the loan had an outstanding balance of $2,813. There is no restrictive financial covenants associated with this term loan.
The long term debt is repayable as follows for the years ending December 31

     
- 2004 $1,125 
- 2005  1,125 
- 2006  563 
   
 
  $2,813 
   
 

The Company had a seven-year term loan with borrowings in October 2001 totaling $15,000 at a fixed interest rate of 5.05% in the first four years and at a rate of 1% over Singapore Interbank Money Market Offer Rate for the following three years. The loan was secured by a property with net book value of $11,400. At December 31, 2002, the bank loan had an outstanding balance of $12,860. On January 3, 2003, Company repaid the entire outstanding balance due to the bank, resulting in a finance charge on early repayment of $610, which was expensed in 2002.

F-21


12.Shareholders’ Equity

(a)  The Company has only one class of common shares authorized, issued and outstanding.
 
 (b)Stock options

In August 1993, the Board of Directors approved a stock option plan which authorized the issuance of 900,000 vested options to key employees, consultants or advisors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In December 1993, January 1996 and April 1999, the option plan was amended and the maximum number of shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of options granted was increased to 1,950,000 and 3,000,000 and 4,275,000, respectively. The options granted under this plan vest immediately and generally have a term of three years, but cannot exceed ten years. The options are granted to employees based on past performance and/or expected contribution to the Company.

In May 2001, the Board of Directors approved another stock option plan which would grant 15,000 options to each non-employee director of the Company elected at each annual general meeting of shareholders, and might grant options to key employees, consultants or advisors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to subscribe for its shares in accordance with the terms of this stock option plan based on past performance and/or expected contributions to the Company. The maximum number of shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of options granted was 3,000,000 shares. The options granted under this plan vest immediately and generally have a term of three years, subject to the discretion of the board of directors but cannot exceed ten years.

F-22


11. Shareholders’ Equity — continued

 (b)  In August 1993, the Board of Directors approved a stock option plan which authorized the issuance of 900,000 vestedStock options to key employees, consultants or advisors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In December 1993, January 1996 and April 1999, the option plan was amended and the maximum number of shares to be issued pursuant to the exercise of options granted was increased to 1,950,000 and 3,000,000 and 4,275,000, respectively. The options granted under this plan vest immediately and generally have a term of three years, but cannot exceed ten years. The options are granted to employees based on past performance and/or expected contribution to the Company.— continued

In 2003, the Company suspended issuing options to management and employees except for the non-employee directors and approved an incentive bonus program to reward management and employees with a cash bonus instead; however, in 2004, the Company had decided to resume issuing stock options to employees in addition to giving cash bonuses.

A summary of stock option activity during the three years ended December 31, 2004 is as follows:

         
  Number of  Weighted average 
  options  option price per share 
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2002  2,122,200  $4.32 
Granted  900,000  $6.62 
Exercised  (1,573,200) $4.24 
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2002  1,449,000  $5.84 
Granted  75,000  $18.50 
Exercised prior to 10 for 1 stock dividend  (1,422,500) $5.97 
Effect of 10 for 1 stock dividend on stock option  10,150     
Exercised after 10 for 1 stock dividend  (3,100) $6.02 
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2003  108,550  $12.34 
Granted  645,000  $19.40 
Exercised  (16,500) $4.39 
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2004  737,050  $18.70 
       

During 2002, 6,000 advisors’ options with an exercise price of $6.62 exercisable from April 30, 2002 and expiring on April 30, 2005 were granted to an advisor and all were exercised during 2003. The Company recorded compensation expense of $10 for the 2002 advisors’ options based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. No advisors’ options were granted during 2003 and 2004.

Details of the options granted by the Company in 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:

         
Number of Exercise    
options granted price  Exercisable period 
 
In 2002        
         
900,000 $6.02* April 30, 2002 to April 30, 2005
         
In 2003        
         
75,000 $16.82* July 8, 2003 to July 8, 2006
         
In 2004        
         
645,000 $19.40  July 30, 2004 to July 30, 2006

The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004. All stock options are exercisable as of December 31, 2004.

         
      Weighted average
  Number  remaining contractual
Exercise prices of options  life in months
$  6.02*  26,050   4.0 
$16.82*  66,000   18.3 
$19.40  645,000   19.0 
        
   737,050   18.4 
        


 *  In May 2001, the Board of Directors approved another stock option plan which would grant 15,000 optionsSubsequent to each independent director of the Company elected at each annual general meeting of shareholders, and might grant options to key employees, consultants or advisors of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to subscribe for its shares in accordance with the terms of this stock option plan. The maximum number of shares to be issued pursuant toNovember 7, 2003, the exercise of options granted was 3,000,000 shares. The options granted under this plan vest immediately and generally have a term of three years, but cannot exceed ten years. The options are grantedprice has been adjusted to independent directors based on past performance and/or expected contributions toreflect the Company.10 for 1 stock dividend effect.

F-23


11. Shareholders’ Equity — continued

 (b)  Effective January 1, 2003, the Company has suspended issuingStock options to management and employees except for the independent directors. Rather, the Board of Directors approved an incentive bonus program to reward management and employees with a cash bonus in lieu of stock options.
A summary of stock option activity during the three years ended December 31, 2003 is as follows:— continued

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was 22, 23 and 18 months, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $1.66, $7.76 and $6.94, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions:

          
   Number of Option price per share with the weighted
   options average option price in parenthesis
   
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2001  1,308,000  $3.50, $4.63, $4.94, $5.25 and $5.46 ($4.37)
 Granted  1,314,759  $4.65, $4.83 and $2.33 ($4.11)
 Exercised  (348,000) $3.50, $4.63 and $5.25 ($3.54)
 Cancelled  (152,559) $4.63, $4.65 and $4.94 ($4.67)
   
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2001  2,122,200  $2.33, $4.63, $4.65, $4.83 and $5.46 ($4.32)
 Granted  900,000  $6.62
 Exercised  (1,573,200) $2.33, $4.63, $4.65 and $6.62 ($4.24)
   
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2002  1,449,000  $4.63, $4.65, $4.83, $5.46 and $6.62 ($5.84)
 Granted  75,000  $18.50
 Exercised prior to 10 for 1 stock dividend  (1,422,500) $4.63, $4.65, $4.83, $5.46, and $18.50 ($5.97)
 Effect of 10 for 1 stock dividend on stock option  10,150     
 Exercised after 10 for 1 stock dividend  (3,100) $6.02 ($6.02)
   
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2003  108,550  $4.39, $6.02 and $16.82 ($12.34)
   
  
             
Year ended December, 31 2002  2003  2004 
Risk-free interest rate  4.5%  2.56%  2.75%
Expected life 3 years 3 years 2 years
Expected volatility  36.0%  64.24%  68.62%
Expected dividend per quarter $0.04  $0.05  $0.12 

 (c)  During 2002, 6,000 advisors’ options with an exercise price of $6.62 exercisable from April 30, 2002 and expiring on April 30, 2005 were granted to an advisor and all were exercised during 2003. The Company recorded compensation expense of $10 for the 2002 advisors’ options based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. No advisors’ options were granted during 2001 and 2003.Public warrants

F-22On October 10, 1997, the Company distributed to each holder of its common shares nontransferable rights (the “Rights”) to subscribe for one unit for every three common shares owned at that date (referred to as the “Rights Offering”). The subscription price was $5.67 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one redeemable common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable to purchase one common share at a price of $6.80 per share at any time from the date of their issuance until November 24, 2000. The common shares and the warrants included in the units will be separately transferable immediately on issuance of the common shares. The warrants are redeemable by the Company at any time at $0.02 per warrant if the average closing sale price of the common shares for 20 consecutive trading days within the 30-day period preceding the date the notice is given equals or exceeds $8.50 per share. The terms of the Rights Offering include an over subscription privilege available to shareholders subject to certain conditions and a Standby Purchase Commitment made by the Standby Underwriters to the Rights Offering, subject to the terms and conditions of a Standby Underwriting Agreement made between the Company and the Standby Underwriters, and which includes purchase by the Standby Underwriters of units not subscribed for by shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to the Rights Offering, 9,000,000 units were offered with a subscription expiry date of November 24, 1997.


During the period of the Rights Offering, shareholders of the Company exercised Rights to purchase a total of 6,803,751 units at $5.67 per unit and the Standby Underwriters purchased a total of 2,187,636 units at a price of $5.58, being the lower of the subscription price per unit and the closing bid price per common share as reported on the Nasdaq on the subscription expiry date, as provided for under the Standby Underwriting Agreement. The gross proceeds raised amounted to $50,769 and the net proceeds raised after deduction of expenses associated with the Rights Offering amounted to $47,700.

12.Shareholders’ Equity - continued
On April 1, 2000, the Company amended the terms of the warrant by extending the expiry date of the warrants from November 24, 2000 to November 24, 2002. The extending of the expiry date of the warrants created a new measurement date for the warrants, however, the resulting amount was immaterial. During 2002, 4,381,965 warrants were exercised. On November 24, 2002, all of the remaining warrants expired.

 (b)(d)Stock options - continued
Details of the options granted by the Company in 2001, 2002 and 2003 are as follows:Advisors’ warrants

          
Number of Exercise    
options granted price Exercisable period

 
 
In 2001        
833,559 $4.65  March 16, 2001 to March 16, 2004
165,000 $4.39* June 22, 2001 to June 22, 2004
316,200 $2.33  June 27, 2001 to June 22, 2002
In 2002        
900,000 $6.02* April 30, 2002 to April 30, 2005
In 2003        
75,000 $16.82* July 8, 2003 to July 8, 2006
       
*  Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the exercise price has been adjusted to reflect the 10 for 1 stock dividend effect.

On December 2, 1997, the Company issued 390,000 units to its advisors and 30,000 remained outstanding in 2002. These advisors’ warrants expired on November 24, 2002.

The 174,090 warrants issued pursuant to the exercise of advisors’ warrants bear the same rights as public warrants.

 (e)  Stock option costs of $839 charged to the selling, general and administrative expenses in 2001 represented the difference between the market price and exercisable price of $2.33 for the 316,200 options granted during 2001.
The following summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003. All stock options are exercisable as of December 31, 2003.Share buy — back program

         
      Weighted average
  Number remaining contractual
Exercise prices of options life in months

 
 
$4.39  16,500   5.7 
$6.02  26,050   15.9 
$16.82  66,000   30.2 
   
   
 
   108,550   23.0 
   
   
 

The Company repurchased shares under its buy-back program as follows. All shares were purchased at the prevailing market price at the date of the buy back and were settled out of the Company’s retained earnings.

         
Year Shares repurchased  Average purchase price 
2002  592,800  $5.95 

No shares were repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004.

F-24


11. Shareholders’ Equity — continued

 (f)  The weighted average remaining contractual life of the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 was 18, 22 and 23 months, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2001, 2002 and 2003 was $1.71, $1.66 and $7.76, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions:

             
Year ended December, 31 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Risk-free interest rate  5%  4.5%  2.56%
Expected life 1 - 3 years 3 years 3 years
Expected volatility  45.0%  36.0%  64.24%
Expected dividend per quarter $0.03  $0.04  $0.05 

(c)Advisors’ warrants
On December 2, 1997, the Company issued 390,000 units to its advisors. The holder of each unit is entitled to purchase from the Company at the purchase price of $6.80 per unit one common share and one warrant exercisable to purchase one common share at $6.80 per share for the period from November 30, 1998 to November 24, 2000. In 2000, 174,090 advisors’ warrants were exercised, 185,910 advisors’ warrants had expired and the expiry date of exercisable period for the remaining 30,000 advisors’ warrants was extended to November 24, 2002. As a result, 174,090 common shares and 174,090 warrants were issued during the year ended December 31, 2000. The compensation expense for the extention of the expiry date of the 30,000 advisors’ warrants, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was $43 and has been charged to the consolidated statement of income in 2000. The remaining 30,000 of these advisors’ warrants expired on November 24, 2002.Share redemptions

F-23On January 22, 1999, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the Company redeemed and canceled 415,500 shares of the Company registered in the name of Tele-Art at a price of $3.73 per share for $1,549 (see note 18(b)).

On August 12, 2002, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the Company redeemed and cancelled an additional 509,181 shares of the Company beneficially owned by Tele-Art at a price of $6.14 per share for $3,125 (see note 18(b)).

No shares were redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2004.

12. Earnings Per Share

The calculations of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows:

             
      Weighted    
      average number  Per share 
Year ended December 31, 2002 Income  of shares *  amount 
   
Basic earnings per share $20,023   34,885,366  $0.57 
             
Effect of dilutive securities            
- Stock options     476,837     
- Warrants     67,914     
   
             
Diluted earnings per share $20,023   35,430,117  $0.57 
   

All options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of 2002 diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common stock.

             
      Weighted    
      average number  Per share 
Year ended December 31, 2003 Income  of shares *  amount 
   
Continuing operations            
Basic earnings per share $41,823   40,336,439  $1.04 
             
Effect of dilutive securities            
- Stock options     502,701     
   
             
Diluted earnings per share $41,823   40,839,140  $1.02 
   
             
Discontinued operation            
Basic earnings per share $1,979   40,336,439  $0.05 
             
Effect of dilutive securities            
- Stock options     502,701     
   
             
Diluted earnings per share $1,979   40,839,140  $0.05 
   
             
Net income            
Basic earnings per share $43,802   40,336,439  $1.09 
             
Effect of dilutive securities            
- Stock options     502,701     
   
             
Diluted earnings per share $43,802   40,839,140  $1.07 
   

All options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of 2003 diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common stock.

F-25


12. Earnings Per Share — continued

             
      Weighted    
      average number  Per share 
Year ended December 31, 2004 Income  of shares  amount 
   
Basic earnings per share $66,885   42,496,122  $1.57 
             
Effect of dilutive securities            
- Stock options     52,123    
   
             
Diluted earnings per share $66,885   42,548,245  $1.57 
   

12.Shareholders’ Equity - continued
All options to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of 2004 diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common stock.

(c)Advisors’ warrants - continued
On October 5, 1998, the Company issued 900,000 warrants to an advisor as consideration of advisory services under a service contract for a period of 3 years. The holder of each warrant is entitled to purchase from the Company one common share at $3.42 per share for the period from October 5, 1999 to October 4, 2001. These warrants have been accounted for using variable accounting and the related compensation expense of $263 has been charged to the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2001. In 2001, all these warrants were exercised.
The fair values of the advisors’ warrants were calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the following assumptions:

         
  $6.80 Advisors' $3.42 Advisors'
  warrants warrants
  
 
Risk-free interest rate  6.50%  6.50%
Expected life November 24, 2002
 October 4, 2001
Expected volatility  50%  50%
Expected dividend per quarter $0.03  $0.03 
* Adjusted for 1 for 3 stock split and 10 for 1 stock dividend.

(d)Public warrants
On October 10, 1997, the Company distributed to each holder of its common shares nontransferable rights (the “Rights”) to subscribe for one unit for every three common shares owned at that date (referred to as the “Rights Offering”). The subscription price was $5.67 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one redeemable common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable to purchase one common share at a price of $6.80 per share at any time from the date of their issuance until November 24, 2000. The common shares and the warrants included in the units will be separately transferable immediately on issuance of the common shares. The warrants are redeemable by the Company at any time at $0.02 per warrant if the average closing sale price of the common shares for 20 consecutive trading days within the 30-day period preceding the date the notice is given equals or exceeds $8.50 per share. The terms of the Rights Offering include an over subscription privilege available to shareholders subject to certain conditions and a Standby Purchase Commitment made by the Standby Underwriters to the Rights Offering, subject to the terms and conditions of a Standby Underwriting Agreement made between the Company and the Standby Underwriters, and which includes purchase by the Standby Underwriters of units not subscribed for by shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to the Rights Offering, 9,000,000 units were offered with a subscription expiry date of November 24, 1997.
During the period of the Rights Offering, shareholders of the Company exercised Rights to purchase a total of 6,803,751 units at $5.67 per unit and the Standby Underwriters purchased a total of 2,187,636 units at a price of $5.58, being the lower of the subscription price per unit and the closing bid price per common share as reported on the Nasdaq on the subscription expiry date, as provided for under the Standby Underwriting Agreement. The gross proceeds raised amounted to $50,769 and the net proceeds raised after deduction of expenses associated with the Rights Offering amounted to $47,700.
On April 1, 2000, the Company amended the terms of the warrant by extending the expiry date of the warrants from November 24, 2000 to November 24, 2002. The extending of the expiry date of the warrants created a new measurement date for the warrants, however, the resulting amount was immaterial. During 2002, 4,381,965 warrants were exercised. On November 24, 2002, all of the remaining warrants expired.
The 174,090 warrants issued pursuant to the exercise of advisors’ warrants above bear the same rights as public warrants.
(e)Share buy - back program
The Company repurchased shares under its buy-back program as follows. All shares were purchased at the prevailing market price at the date of the buy back and were settled out of the Company's retained earnings.

         
Year Shares repurchased Average purchase price

 
 
2001  683,700  $4.90 
2002  592,800  $5.95 
13. Other (Expenses) Income — Net

F-24Other (expenses) income — net consists of:

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
Miscellaneous expense $(771) $(886) $(947)
Non-trade receivable recovered     500    
Foreign exchange (loss) gain  (345)  (62)  189 
Bank charges  (307)  (274)  (206)
Finance charge on early repayment of a bank loan  (610)      
Release of unamortized goodwill of an affiliated company            
- Mate Fair (see note 3(b)(v))  (520)      
Realized gain on disposal of marketable securities  642       
Dividend income received from marketable securities and investment  917   3,714   18,295 
Gain on disposal of intangible asset (see note 16)  60       
Gain on disposal of other assets        19 
Gain on disposal of land     9    
Loss on disposal of investment        (67)
Loss on disposal of convertible notes (see note 9 (a))     (102)   
Redemption of shares in legal settlement, net of expenses            
- Tele Art case (see note 18(b))  3,333       
Provision for loss on Tele-Art Case for 1999 and 2002 share redemptions (see note 18(b))  (5,192)      
Loss on reverse merger of JIC Group, including release of unamortized goodwill of $1,483 (see note 3(b)(ii))  (2,655)      
Legal expense related to reverse merger of JIC Group  (1,411)      
   
  $(6,859) $2,899  $17,283 
   

F-26


14. Staff Retirement Plans

12.Shareholders’ Equity - continued
The Company operates a Mandatory Provident Fund (“MPF”) scheme for all qualifying employees in Hong Kong and a retirement benefit scheme (“RBS”) for all qualifying employees in Macao. The MPF and RBS are defined contribution schemes and the assets of the schemes are managed by the trustees independent to the Company.

(f)Share redemptions
On January 22, 1999, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the Company redeemed and cancelled 415,500 shares of the Company registered in the name of Tele-Art at a price of 3.73 per share for $1,549 (see note 19(b)).
On August 12, 2002, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the Company redeemed and cancelled an additional 509,181, shares of the Company beneficially owned by Tele-Art at a price of $6.14 per share for $3,125 (see note 19(b)).
Both the MPF and RBS are available to all employees aged 18 to 64 and with at least 60 days of service under the employment of the Company in Hong Kong and Macao. Contributions are made by the Company at 5% based on the staff’s relevant income. The maximum relevant income for contribution purpose per employee is $3 per month. Staff members are entitled to 100% of the Company’s contributions together with accrued returns irrespective of their length of service with the Company, but the benefits are required by law to be preserved until the retirement age of 65 for employees in Hong Kong while the benefit can be withdrawn by the employees in Macao at the end of employment contracts.

13.Earnings Per Share
The calculations of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows:

              
       Weighted    
       average number Per share
Year ended December 31, 2001 Income of shares * amount

 
 
 
Basic earnings per share $9,045   33,905,444  $0.27 
Effect of dilutive securities            
 - Stock options     186,978     
 - Warrants     205,834     
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share $9,045   34,298,256  $0.26 
   
   
   
 
According to the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC, the Company is required to contribute 8% to 9% of the stipulated salary set by the local government of Shenzhen, the PRC, to the retirement benefit schemes to fund the retirement benefits of their employees. The principal obligation of the Company with respect to these retirement benefit schemes is to make the required contributions under the scheme. No forfeited contributions may be used by the employer to reduce the existing level of contributions.

Stock options to purchase 45,000 shares of common shares at $5.46, warrants to purchase 9,165,477 shares of common shares at $6.80 and 30,000 advisors’ warrants were outstanding at December 31, 2001 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the stock options and warrants was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the relevant period. The holder of each advisors’ warrant is entitled to purchase from the Company at the purchase price of $6.80 per unit one common share and one warrant exercisable to purchase one common share at $6.80 per share.

              
       Weighted    
       average number Per share
Year ended December 31, 2002 Income of shares * amount

 
 
 
Basic earnings per share $20,023   34,885,366  $0.57 
Effect of dilutive securities            
 - Stock options     476,837     
 - Warrants     67,914     
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share $20,023   35,430,117  $0.57 
   
   
   
 
The cost of the Company’s contribution to the staff retirement plans in Hong Kong, Macao and PRC amounted to $617, $982 and $1,190 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

All options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of 2002 diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common stock.

              
       Weighted    
       average number Per share
Year ended December 31, 2003 Income of shares * amount

 
 
 
Continuing Operations
            
Basic earnings per share $41,823   40,336,439  $1.04 
Effect of dilutive securities            
 - Stock options     502,701     
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share $41,823   40,839,140  $1.02 
   
   
   
 
Discontinued operation
            
Basic earnings per share $1,979   40,336,439  $0.05 
Effect of dilutive securities            
 - Stock options     502,701     
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share $1,979   40,839,140  $0.05 
   
   
   
 
             
Net income
            
Basic earnings per share $43,802   40,336,439  $1.09 
Effect of dilutive securities            
 - Stock options     502,701     
   
   
   
 
Diluted earnings per share $43,802   40,839,140  $1.07 
   
   
   
 
15. Income Taxes

All options to purchase shares of common stock were included in the computation of 2003 diluted earnings per share as the exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common stock.
* Adjusted for 3 for 1 stock split and 10 for 1 stock dividend.
The components of income before income taxes and minority interest are as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao $18,823  $39,778  $37,546 
Hong Kong, Macao and other jurisdictions  (8,604)  3,013   43,034 
   
  $10,219  $42,791  $80,580 
   

F-25Under the current BVI law, the Company’s income is not subject to taxation. Subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong and the PRC are subject to income taxes as described below, and the subsidiary operating in Macao is exempted from income taxes. Under the current Cayman Islands law, ZPTL, NTEEP, JIC Technology and Namtek Software are not subject to profit tax in the Cayman Islands as they have no business operations in the Cayman Islands. However, they may be subject to Hong Kong income taxes as described below if they are registered in Hong Kong

The provision for current income taxes of the subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong has been calculated by applying the current rate of taxation of 16% for 2002 and 17.5% for 2003 and 2004 to the estimated taxable income earned in or derived from Hong Kong during the period, if applicable.

Deferred tax, where applicable, is provided under the liability method at the rate of 16% for 2002 and 17.5% for 2003, and 2004, being the effective Hong Kong statutory income tax rate applicable to the ensuing financial year, on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of measuring assets and liabilities.

The basic corporate tax rate for Foreign Investment Enterprises (“FIEs”) in the PRC, such as Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“NTSZ”), Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Zastron”), Shenzhen Namtek Company Limited (“Shenzhen Namtek”) and Jetup (collectively the “PRC subsidiaries”) is currently 33% (30% state tax and 3% local tax). However, because all the PRC subsidiaries are located in Shenzhen and are involved in production operations, they qualify for a special reduced state tax rate of 15%. In addition, the local tax authorities in Shenzhen are not currently assessing any local tax.

F-27


15. Income Taxes — continued

14.Other Income (Expenses) - Net
Other income (expenses) - net consists of:

             
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Interest income $1,195  $799  $788 
Miscellaneous expense  (294)  (771)  (886)
Non-trade receivable (write-off) recovered  (500)     500 
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  530   (345)  (62)
Bank charges  (333)  (307)  (274)
Release of unamortized goodwill of an affiliated company - - Mate Fair (see note 3(b)(v))     (520)   
Realized gain on disposal of marketable securities     642    
Unrealized gain on marketable securities  1,568       
Dividend income received from marketable securities and investment  525   917   3,714 
Gain on disposal of intangible asset (see note 17) ��   60    
Gain on disposal of a subsidiary (see note 3(b)(i))     17    
Gain on disposal of land  18      9 
Gain on partial disposal of JIC Technology        1,838 
Loss on disposal of convertible notes        (102)
Redemption of shares in legal settlement, net of expenses - - Tele Art case (see note 19(b))     3,333    
Provision for loss on Tele-Art Case for 1999 and 2002 share redemptions (see note 19(b))     (5,192)   
Loss on reverse merger of J.I.C. Group, including release of unamortized goodwill of $1,483 (see note 3(b)(ii))     (2,655)   
Legal expense related to reverse merger of J.I.C. Group     (1,411)   
Finance charge on early repayment of a bank loan (see note 11)     (610)   
   
   
   
 
  $2,709  $(6,043) $5,525 
   
   
   
 

15.Staff Retirement Plans
The Company operates a Mandatory Provident Fund (“MPF”) scheme for all qualifying employees in Hong KongSince the PRC subsidiaries have agreed to operate for a minimum of 10 years in the PRC, a two-year tax holiday from the first profit making year is available, following which in the third through fifth years there is a 50% reduction to 7.5%. In any event, for FIEs such as NTSZ, Zastron and Namtek which export 70% or more of the production value of their products, a reduction in the tax rate is available; in all cases apart from the years in which a tax holiday and a retirement benefit scheme (“RBS”) for all qualifying employees in Macao. The MPF and RBS are defined contribution schemes and the assets of the schemes are managed by the trustees independent to the Company.
Both the MPF and RBS are available to all employees aged 18 to 64 and with at least 60 days of service under the employment of the Company in Hong Kong and Macao. Contributions are made by the Company at 5% based on the staff’s relevant income. The maximum relevant income for contribution purpose per employee is $3 per month. Staff members are entitled to 100% of the Company’s contributions together with accrued returns irrespective of their length of service with the Company, but the benefits are required by law to be preserved until the retirement age of 65 for employees in Hong Kong while the benefit can be withdrawn by the employees in Macao at the end of employment contracts.
According to the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC, the Company is required to contribute 8% to 9% of the stipulated salary set by the local government of Shenzhen, the PRC, to the retirement benefit schemes to fund the retirement benefits of their employees. The principal obligation of the Company with respect to these retirement benefit schemes is to make the required contributions under the scheme. No forfeited contributions may be used by the employer to reduce the existing level of contributions.
The cost of the Company’s contribution to the staff retirement plans in Hong Kong, Macao and PRC amounted to $561, $617 and $982 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

F-26


16.Income Taxes Expense, Net
The components of income before income taxes and minority interest are as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao $9,002  $18,823  $39,778 
Hong Kong and Macao  500   2,137   3,511 
   
   
   
 
  $9,502  $20,960  $43,289 
   
   
   
 

Under the current BVI law, the Company’s income is not subject to taxation. Subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong and the PRC are subject to income taxes as described below, and subsidiary operating in Macao is exempted from income taxes. Under the current Cayman law, Nam Tai Telecom (Cayman) Company Limited, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and Namtek Software are not subject to profit tax as they have no business operation.
The provision for current income taxes of the subsidiaries operating in Hong Kong has been calculated by applying the current rate of taxation of 16% for 2001 and 2002 and 17.5% for 2003 to the estimated taxable income earned in or derived from Hong Kong during the period.
Deferred tax, where applicable, is provided under the liability method at the rate of 16% for 2001 and 2002 and 17.5% for 2003, being the effective Hong Kong statutory income tax rate applicable to the ensuing financial year, on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of measuring assets and liabilities.
The basic corporate tax rate for Foreign Investment Enterprises (“FIEs”) in the PRC, such as Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“NTSZ”), Zastron Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Zastron”), Shenzhen Namtek and Jetup (the “PRC Subsidiaries”) is currently 33% (30% state tax and 3% local tax). However, because all the PRC subsidiaries are located in Shenzhen and are involved in production operations, they qualify for a special reduced state tax rate of 15%. In addition, the local tax authorities in Shenzhen are not currently assessing any local tax.
Since the PRC subsidiaries have agreed to operate for a minimum of 10 years in the PRC, a two-year tax holiday from the first profit making year is available, following which in the third through fifth years there is a 50% reduction to 7.5%. In any event, for FIEs such as NTSZ, Zastron and Namtek which export 70% or more of the production value of their products, a reduction in the tax rate is available; in all cases apart from the years in which a tax holiday or tax incentive is available, there is an overall minimum tax rate of 10%. The following details the tax concessions received for the Company’s PRC subsidiaries:

   On January 8, 1999, NTSZ received the recognition of “High and New Technology Enterprise” which entitles it to various tax benefits including a lower income tax rate of 7.5% until 2003. In July 2002, the Shenzhen local tax authority issued a notice to shorten the tax incentive period from 5 years to 3 years expiring in 2001. Nevertheless NTSZ was advised by the Shenzhen local tax authority that it would continue to provide a rebate of corporate tax paid for 2 years for 2002 and 2003. During 2003, NTSZ received $110 rebate of corporate tax paid for 2002. In addition, NTSZ received2002, a tax refund of $122 from reinvestment of profits for 1999 to 2001 and a refund of $441 for being aan export-oriented enterprise in 2002. In 2004, NTSZ received a tax refund of $821 from reinvestment of profits for 2002 and a refund of $399 for being an export-oriented enterprise in 2003.
 
 Income tax of Zastron was payable at the rate of 10% on the assessable profits of Zastron for the years ended December 31, 1999 to 2000. In 2003 Zastron received a refund of $56 from reinvestment of profits for 1999 and a refund of $124 for being an export-oriented enterprise in 2002. On May 13, 2004, Zastron received the recognition of “High and New Technology Enterprise” and was entitled to enjoy a reduced corporate tax rate of 7.5% for three years commencing 2004. In 2004 Zastron received a refund of $243 from reinvestment of profits for 1999 to 2002 and a refund of $793 for being an export-oriented enterprise in 2003.
 
   For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, the income tax of Jieda Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Jieda”), a then wholly owned subsidiary of JIC Technology, was payable at the rate of 15% on the assessable profit. During 2003, Jieda merged with Jetup.

F-27


16. Income Taxes Expense, Net - continued

   In February 2001, Shenzhen Namtek received the recognition of “Advanced Technology Enterprise” which entitles it to various tax benefits including a lower income tax rate of 7.5% until 2003. In 2003, Shenzhen Namtek claimedreceived a refund of $27 from the reinvestment of profits for 1998 to 2000. In 2004, Shenzhen Namtek is entitled to a 5% tax refund for being an export-oriented enterprise in 2004.
 
 Income tax of Jetup was payable at the rate of 7.5% on its assessable profit for the years ended December 31, 1999 to 2001. The Shenzhen local tax authority has granted Jetup the status of “High and New Technology Enterprise” and allowed it to enjoy a 50% reduction in corporatelower income tax rate to 7.5% for 3 years from 2002 to 2004. During 2003, Jetup received a refund of $175 from reinvestment of profit for 2002.
 
   Income tax of Jieyao Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Jieyao”), a then wholly owned subsidiary of JIC Technology was payable at the rate of 7.5% on the assessable profit for the years ended December 31, 20012002 to 2003. During 2003, Jieyao was disposed of to a third party (see note 3(b)(iii)).
 
   For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, BPC qualified for a tax holiday. During 2002, BPC was disposed of to TBCL (see note 3(b)(i)).
An FIE whose foreign investor directly reinvests by way of capital injection its share of profits obtained from that FIE or another FIE owned by the same foreign investor in establishing or expanding an export-oriented or technologically advanced enterprise in the PRC for a minimum period of five years may obtain a refund of the taxes already paid on those profits. NTSZ, Zastron, Shenzhen Namtek and Jetup qualified for such refunds of taxes as a result of reinvesting their profit earned in previous years by their respective holding companies. As a result, the Company recorded tax expense net of the benefit related to the refunds. At December 31, 2002 and 2003, taxes recoverable under such arrangements were $789 and $4,889, respectively, which are included in income taxes recoverable and expected to be received during 2004. However, during 2003 the Shenzhen government did not refund approximately $13 in taxes the Company paid in 1998 to 2000. Therefore, the Company reversed the related receivable into current tax expense in 2003.
In accordance with its normal practice, the Hong Kong tax authorities selected the Company and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries for a tax audit. In March 2003, in relation to fiscal year 1996, the Hong Kong tax authorities have made certain estimated assessments for public revenue protection purposes to prevent the assessments, if any, from becoming time barred. The Hong Kong tax authorities have not provided concrete grounds for the assessments. The Company and the subsidiary concerned have objected to these estimated assessments. The outcome of the objection is uncertain at this stage as the Hong Kong tax authorities are still reviewing the Company’s and its subsidiary’s Hong Kong tax position. At the time, it is not possible to estimate the outcome of the tax audit, the amount that may have to be paid, if any, or the impact that the results of the 1996 tax audit will have to subsequent tax years. However, management is of the view that there will be no material tax adjustment as a result of the tax audit.
The current and deferred components of the income tax expense appearing in the consolidated statements of income are as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Current tax $(110) $(812) $(433)
Deferred tax  (117)  39   34 
   
   
   
 
  $(227) $(773) $(399)
   
   
   
 

A FIE whose foreign investor directly reinvests by way of capital injection its share of profits obtained from that FIE or another FIE owned by the same foreign investor in establishing or expanding an export-oriented or technologically advanced enterprise in the PRC for a minimum period of five years may obtain a refund of the taxes already paid on those profits. The PRC subsidiaries qualified for such refunds of taxes as a result of reinvesting their profit earned in previous years by their respective holding companies. As a result, the Company recorded tax expense net of the benefit related to the refunds. At December 31, 2003 and 2004, taxes recoverable under such arrangements were $4,889 and $6,520, respectively, which are included in income taxes recoverable and expected to be received during 2004 and 2005, respectively. However, during 2003 the Shenzhen government did not refund approximately $13 in taxes the Company paid in 1998 to 2000. Therefore, the Company reversed the related receivable into current tax expense in 2003.

In accordance with its normal practice, the Hong Kong tax authorities selected the Company and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries for a tax audit. In March 2003, in relation to fiscal year 1996, the Hong Kong tax authorities have made certain estimated assessments for public revenue protection purposes to prevent the assessments, if any, from becoming time barred. The Hong Kong tax authorities have not provided concrete grounds for the assessments. The Company and the subsidiary concerned have objected to these estimated assessments. The outcome of the objection is uncertain at this stage as the Hong Kong tax authorities are still reviewing the Company’s and its subsidiary’s Hong Kong tax position. At the time, it is not possible to estimate the outcome of the tax audit, the amount that may have to be paid, if any, or the impact that the results of the 1996 tax audit will have to subsequent tax years. However, management is of the view that there will be no material tax adjustment as a result of the tax audit. In March 2004, this wholly owned subsidiary received a tax demand note from the Hong Kong tax authorities for additional tax assessment for the fiscal year 1997. The subsidiary requested for an unconditional hold-over of such assessment and was denied by the Hong Kong tax authorities. In June 2004, this subsidiary applied to the High Court of Hong Kong for a judicial review and the hearing is scheduled to be held on April 25 and 26, 2005. Management is of the view that they will obtain favorable judgment and hence, no material tax adjustment is expected.

F-28


15. Income Taxes — continued

The current and deferred components of the income tax expense appearing in the consolidated statements of income are as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
Current tax $(812) $(433) $(957)
Deferred tax  39   34   78 
   
  $(773) $(399) $(879)
   

     The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 are attributable to the following:

         
December 31, 2003  2004 
   
Property, plant and equipment $(78) $ 
Net operating losses     5,863 
   
  ��(78)  5,863 
Valuation allowance     (5,863)
   
  $(78) $ 
   

The realization of the recorded deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards. As the management does not believe that it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax asset will be realized, a full valuation allowance has been established at December 31, 2004.

At December 31, 2002 and 2003, the Company did not have any net operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2004, the Company had net operating losses of $5,863 which may be carried forward indefinitely.

A reconciliation of the income tax expense to the amount computed by applying the current tax rate to the income before income taxes in the consolidated statements of income is as follows:

             
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
Income before income taxes and minority interests $10,219  $42,791  $80,580 
PRC tax rate  15%  15%  15%
Income tax expense at PRC tax rate on income before income tax $(1,533) $(6,419) $(12,087)
Effect of difference between Hong Kong and PRC tax rates applied to Hong Kong income  42   72   205 
Effect of (loss) income for which no income tax benefit/ expense is receivable/payable  (661)  796   7,660 
Tax holidays and tax incentives  542   2,122   2,220 
Effect of PRC tax concessions, giving rise to no PRC tax liability  2,153   3,435   2,774 
Tax losses not recognised        (1,026)
Tax benefit (expense) arising from items which are not assessable (deductible) for tax purposes:            
Gain on disposal of land in Hong Kong     1    
Exempted interest income  12   16   24 
Non-deductible legal and professional fees  (234)  (301)  (282)
Non-deductible and non-taxable other items  (466)  (105)  17 
Overprovision for income tax expense in prior year     103    
Underprovision of income tax expense in prior years  (501)     (268)
Other  (127)  (119)  (116)
   
  $(773) $(399) $(879)
   

No income tax arose in the United States of America in any of the periods presented.

Tax that would otherwise have been payable without tax holidays and tax concessions amounts to approximately $2,695, $5,557 and $4,994 in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively (representing a decrease in the basic earnings and diluted earnings per share of $0.08, $0.14 and $0.12 in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively).

F-29


16. Related Party Balance and Transactions

For the period from January 1, 2002 though April 2002, the Company recognized net sales of $7,849 and purchased raw materials of $7,751 from TBCL, a minority shareholder of BPC, and its related companies. In addition, the Company had paid $1,000 to TBCL for acquisition of a license during the year ended December 31, 1999, which was disposed of during 2002 for a consideration of $800 together with the disposal of interest in BPC, plus the foreign exchange gain of $9, resulting in a gain of $60.

As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, the balance due from a related party represented the balance due from JCT, a subsidiary of Alpha Star. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company recognized net sales of $20,782 and $34,181 and purchased raw materials of $5,456 and $12,398 from JCT and its related companies, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company disposed of certain other assets to a director of the Company at a consideration of $231, which represented the then carrying value of the assets. No significant gain or loss arose from such transaction.

17. Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of its cash equivalents and trade receivables.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are high-quality deposits placed with banking institutions with high credit ratings. This investment policy limits the Company’s exposure to concentrations of credit risk.

The trade receivable balances largely represent amounts due from the Company’s principal customers who are generally international organizations with high credit ratings. Letters of credit are the principal security obtained to support lines of credit or negotiated contracts from a customer. As a consequence, concentrations of credit risk are limited. Allowance for doubtful debts was $119 and $157 in 2003 and 2004, respectively. There were no other movements in the provision for doubtful accounts.

The Company’s financial instruments reported in current assets or current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s financial instruments reported as non-current liabilities, such as its long term debt, approximate their fair value due to the variable nature of the interest calculations.

18. Commitments and Contingencies

 (a)  Deferred tax liabilities consist of tax allowances over depreciation and are $112 and $78 at December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
At December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, the Company does not have any tax loss carryforwards.Lease commitments

F-28The Company leases premises under various operating leases, certain of which contain contingent escalation clauses whereby the percentage increase is subject to periodic review and agreement between the Company and the lessor. Rental expense under operating leases was $909, $617 and $975 in the years ended December 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

At December 31, 2004, the Company was obligated under operating leases, which relate to land and buildings, requiring minimum rentals as follows:

Year ending December 31,

     
- 2005 $1,243 
- 2006  1,116 
- 2007  1,169 
- 2008  1,215 
- 2009  1,215 
- 2010 and thereafter  3,178 
    
  $9,136 
    

F-30


16.Income Taxes Expense, Net 18. Commitments and Contingencies- continued
A reconciliation of the income tax expense to the amount computed by applying the current tax rate to the income before income taxes in the consolidated statements of income is as follows:

              
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Income before income taxes and minority interests $9,502  $20,960  $43,289 
PRC tax rate  15%  15%  15%
Income tax expense at PRC tax rate on income before income tax $(1,425) $(3,144) $(6,493)
Effect of difference between Hong Kong and PRC tax rates applied to Hong Kong income  (7)  42   72 
Effect of income (loss) for which no income tax benefit/ expense is receivable/payable  (35)  950   870 
Tax holidays and tax incentives  786   542   2,122 
Effect of PRC tax concessions, giving rise to no PRC tax liability  564   2,153   3,435 
Tax benefit (expense) arising from items which are not assessable (deductible) for tax purposes:            
 Gain on disposal of land in Hong Kong  6      1 
 Exempted interest income  21   12   16 
 Non-deductible legal and professional fees     (234)  (301)
 Non-deductible other items  (159)  (466)  (105)
Overprovision for income tax expense in prior year        103 
Underprovision of income tax expense in prior years     (501)   
Other  22   (127)  (119)
   
   
   
 
  $(227) $(773) $(399)
   
   
   
 

 (b)  No income tax arose in the United States of America in any of the periods presented.
Tax that would otherwise have been payable without tax holidays and tax concessions amounts to approximately $1,350, $2,695 and $5,557 in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively (representing a decrease in the basic earnings and diluted earnings per share of $0.04, $0.08 and $0.14 in the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively).
17.Related Party Balance and Transactions
Since the establishment of BPC in 2000, the Company recognized net sales of $21,072 and $7,849, purchased raw materials of $23,065 and $7,751, acquired property, plant and equipment of $50 and $Nil, from TBCL, a minority shareholder of BPC, and its related companies for the year ended December 31, 2001 and for the period from January 1, 2002 though April 2002, respectively. In addition, the Company had paid $1,000 to TBCL for acquisition of a license during the year ended December 31, 1999, which was disposed of during 2002 for a consideration of $800 together with the disposal of interest in BPC, plus the foreign exchange gain of $9, resulting in a gain of $60.
As of December 31, 2003, the balance due from a related party represented the balance due from JCT, a subsidiary of Alpha Star. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recognized net sales of $20,782 and purchased raw materials of $5,456 from JCT and its related companies.Significant legal proceedings

F-29In June 1997, the Company filed a petition in BVI for the winding up of Tele-Art on account of an unpaid judgment debt owing to the Company. The High Court of Justice granted an order to wind up Tele-Art in July 1998 and the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal upheld the decision on January 25, 1999. On January 22, 1999, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the Company redeemed and cancelled 415,500 shares * of the Company registered in the name of Tele-Art at a price of $3.73 per share to offset substantially all of the judgment debt of $799, plus interest and legal costs totalling $1,673, including dividends that the Company had withheld and credited against the judgment debt.


18.Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of its cash equivalents and trade receivables.
The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are high-quality deposits placed with banking institutions with high credit ratings. This investment policy limits the Company’s exposure to concentrations of credit risk.
The trade receivable balances largely represent amounts due from the Company’s principal customers who are generally international organizations with high credit ratings. Letters of credit are the principal security obtained to support lines of credit or negotiated contracts from a customer. As a consequence, concentrations of credit risk are limited. Allowance for doubtful debts was $122 and $119 in 2002 and 2003, respectively. There were no other movements in the provision for doubtful accounts.
All of the Company’s significant financial instruments at December 31, 2002 and 2003 are reported in current assets or current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at carrying amounts which approximate their fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
The Company’s fair value of convertible notes, including the embedded option, was not significantly different from the carrying value at December 31, 2002 and it was disposed of during 2003.
19.Commitments and Contingencies

(a)Lease commitments
The Company leases premises under various operating leases, certain of which contain escalation clauses. Rental expense under operating leases was $1,501, $909 and $617 in the years ended December 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
At December 31, 2003, the Company was obligated under operating leases, which relate to land and buildings, requiring minimum rentals as follows:

     
Year ending December 31,
- 2004 $1,045 
- 2005  1,037 
- 2006  988 
- 2007  1,070 
- 2008  1,087 
- 2009 and thereafter  3,658 
   
 
  $8,885 
   
 

(b)Significant legal proceedings
In June 1997, the Company filed a petition in BVI for the winding up of Tele-Art on account of an unpaid judgment debt owing to the Company. The High Court of Justice granted an order to wind up Tele-Art in July 1998 and the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal upheld the decision on January 25, 1999. On January 22, 1999, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the Company redeemed and cancelled 415,500 shares (*) of the Company registered in the name of Tele-Art at a price of $3.73 per share to offset substantially all of the judgment debt of $799, plus interest and legal costs totalling $1,673, including dividends that the Company had withheld and credited against the judgment debt.
(*: Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the number of shares has been adjusted to 457,050 to reflect the 10 for 1 stock dividend effect.)

F-30


19.Commitments and Contingencies - continued

(b)Significant legal proceedings - continued
Following the completion of the redemption, the Company received notice that the liquidator had obtained an ex-parte injunction preventing the Company from redeeming Nam Tai shares beneficially owned by Tele-Art. On February 4, 1999, the liquidator of Tele-Art filed a further summons in the BVI on its behalf seeking, among other matters:

   A declaration as to the respective priorities of the debts of Tele-Art to the Bank of China, Nam Tai, and other creditors and their respective rights to have their debts discharged out of the proceeds of the Tele-Art’s Nam Tai shares;
 
   An order setting aside the redemption of 415,500 shares, and ordering delivery of all shares in possession or control of Nam Tai to the liquidator; and
 
   Payment of all dividends in respect of Tele-Art’s Nam Tai shares.

On March 26, 2001, the Company filed a summons seeking to remove the liquidator, David Hague, for failing to act diligently in the performance of his duties and for knowingly misleading the court. On September 3, 2002, David Hague submitted a letter of resignation prior to the scheduled removal hearing. A new liquidator was subsequently appointed in July 2003.

On July 5, 2002, upon application by the Company, the court ordered the removal of the liquidator’s ex-parte injunction and ordered an inquiry into damages. On April 16, 2004, the Company filed its amended points of claim of defense. There are currently applications before the Court of Appeal in the British Virgin Islands to determine the progress of this matter as the Company has sought to enter judgment against David Hague who has applied to strike out the Company’s claim for damages. On August 9, 2002, the court delivered a decision awarding the Company a judgment against Tele-Art for approximately $34,000. On August 12, 2002, the Company redeemed and cancelled, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the remaining 509,181 ** shares beneficially owned by Tele-Art at a price of $6.14 per share. Including the dividends which the Company had withheld and credited against the judgment, this offset a further $3,519 in judgment debts owed to the Company by Tele-Art. The Company recorded the $3,333 redemption, net of expenses, as other income in 2002.

On January 21, 2003, a judgment was delivered on the liquidators’ February 4, 1999 summons declaring that the redemption and set off of dividends on the 415,500 shares be set aside and that all Tele-Art property withheld by Nam Tai be delivered to Tele-Art in liquidation. The orders granted in the judgment were substantially different from the relief sought in the February 4, 1999 application. On February 4, 2003, the Company filed an application for a stay of execution and leave to appeal the decision listing eight grounds of appeal, which was granted on June 23, 2003. The case was heard on January 12, 2004 and the judgment was delivered on April 26, 2004. It was held that the redemption of 415,500 shares by the Company was proper and efficacious. However, the Company must return the redemption proceeds and dividends payable received to the liquidator for distribution to creditors. David Hague, who filed the original application in 1999, has obtained leave to appeal to the Privy Council, the final court of appeal, against the decision of the Court of Appeal. It is not expected that this appeal will be heard before 2006. The court also found that Bank of China to be a secured creditor but the court did not determine the amount owed by Tele-Art, Inc. to Bank of China. We dispute that finding, and among other matters, have argued that the proof of debt by Bank of China was incomplete and invalid.

F-31


18. Commitments and Contingencies- continued

(b)Significant legal proceedings- continued

The Bank of China is claiming to be a secured creditor. Bank of China claims that as of December 6, 2004, the debt from Tele-Art Limited, a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Tele-Art, Inc., that is guaranteed by Tele-Art, Inc. was $2,819 with interest accruing daily. However, pursuant to the third liquidator report of October 13, 2004, the liquidator took the view that Bank of China’s proof of debt was incomplete. The liquidator has requested the Court’s approval to take further action and demand that Bank of China provide further information for his consideration. The Company is of the view that the amount of debt owed by Tele-Art Limited to Bank of China may not exceed $1.4 million. Pursuant to the same liquidator report, apart from Nam Tai, the liquidator admitted the proof of debts of two other unsecured creditors with the total amount to approximately $33. David Hague is claiming to have incurred $382 in costs for work as the liquidator. These costs, however, are subject to the approval of the Court and as such are still pending as they have not yet been approved. The liquidator filed a summons for the approval of its third report on October 13, 2004 and this was heard on December 14, 2004. The Court,inter alia, ordered that the liquidator continue the administration of the liquidation of Tele-Art, Inc. substantially in accordance with his proposals contained in the third report as well as the second report.

In 2002, due to the uncertainty of the final outcome of the litigation as a result of the January 21, 2003 judgment and in accordance with SFAS No. 5,“Accounting for Contingencies", the Company recorded a provision for $5,192 as a component of accrued expenses as of December 31, 2002, pending a final determination of this matter by the courts, represented the then best estimate of the net monetary expense the Company would have if its appeal was unsuccessful and its two judgment debts in the total amount of $38,000 (including interest, costs, and related expenses) was determined as having the lowest priorities in recovering from the estate of Tele-Art. According to the information provided by the liquidator on November 7, 2003, apart from Nam Tai, a total of 3 other creditors of Tele-Art, including the Bank of China, submitted their proof of debt to the liquidator for a total claim of approximately $3,390. Together with the outstanding legal charge as at December 31, 2003, the total potential obligation to the Company was estimated to be approximately $3,890, and accordingly, the 2002 provision for $5,192 had been reduced to $3,890 in the fourth quarter of 2003. As a result of the April 26, 2004 judgment, the Company is in negotiations with the liquidator on the distribution of the redemption proceeds among the unsecured creditors. If the Company’s proposal is accepted by the liquidator and approved by the court, and all legal matters related to Tele-Art, Inc. are finalized, including the final determination of the position of the Bank of China, then any remaining portion of the $3,890 provision will be reversed into income in the related period.

However, the actual amount of the recovery, if any, is uncertain, and is dependent on a number of factors including the final determination of the Bank of China’s position. The Company plans to continue to pursue vigorously all legal alternatives available to seek to recover the maximum amount of the outstanding debt from Tele-Art, Inc. as well as to pursue other parties that may have assisted in any transfers of the assets from Tele-Art, Inc. In furtherance of this objective, the Company commenced proceedings in 2002 against David Hague and PriceWaterhouseCoopers for, inter alia, negligence and breach of statutory duty in their conduct of the liquidation. This matter is still in its initial stages as the defendants are seeking leave to appeal against the dismissal of their challenge to the jurisdiction of the BVI courts in this matter. The Company may incur substantial additional costs in pursuing its recovery and such costs may not be recoverable.

(* Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the number of shares has been adjusted to 457,050 to reflect the 10 for 1 stock dividend effect.)

(** Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the number of shares has been adjusted to 560,099 to reflect the 10 for 1 stock dividend effect.)

Shareholders’ Class Actions

On March 11, 2003, the Company were served with a complaint in an action captioned Michael Rocco v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 1148 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Rocco Action. In addition to Nam Tai, certain directors are named as defendants. On or about April 9, 2003, a second complaint was filed in an action captioned A.J. & Celine Steigler v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 2462 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Steigler Action, and together with the Rocco Action, the Actions. The Actions have been consolidated since July 2003 and purports to represent a putative class of persons who purchased the common stock of Nam Tai from July 29, 2002 through February 18, 2003. Plaintiffs in the Actions assert claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and allege that misrepresentations and/or omissions were made during the alleged class periods concerning the recovery of an inventory write-down and a charge to goodwill related to Nam Tai’s LPT segment. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit was denied on September 27, 2004. The putative class action has not been certified as a class action by the court but we expect the plaintiffs to seek such certification in the near future. The court has set May 23, 2005 to near the certification motion. Nam Tai believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the case vigorously.

F-32


19. Segment Information

The Company operates in three segments: CECP, TCA and LCDP. In 2002 and 2003, LCDP also comprised the transformers operations. These segments are operated and managed as strategic business units. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the net income of each segment in assessing performance and allocating resources between segments.

The following table provides operating financial information for the three reportable segments.

Year ended December 31, 2002

                 
  CECP  TCA  LCDP  Total 
Net sales — third parties $94,032  $98,874  $35,261  $228,167 
Net sales — related parties     7,849      7,849 
   
Total net sales  94,032   106,723   35,261   236,016 
Cost of sales  (75,746)  (91,694)  (30,516)  (197,956)
   
Gross profit  18,286   15,029   4,745   38,060 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (8,727)  (6,213)  (3,043)  (17,983)
Research and development expenses  (1,215)  (947)  (524)  (2,686)
Impairment of goodwill     (339)     (339)
Other income (expenses), net  1,780   (7,464)  (1,175)  (6,859)
Gain on partial disposal of subsidiaries     17      17 
Interest income  4   784   11   799 
Interest expense  (1)  (704)  (85)  (790)
   
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests  10,127   163   (71)  10,219 
Income taxes expense  (345)  (365)  (63)  (773)
   
Income before minority interests and equity in income of affiliated companies  9,782   (202)  (134)  9,446 
Minority interests     (107)  (57)  (164)
Equity in income of affiliated companies     10,741      10,741 
   
Net income (loss) $9,782  $10,432  $(191) $20,023 
   

Year ended December 31, 2003

                 
  CECP  TCA  LCDP  Total 
Net sales — third parties $128,778  $215,422  $41,324  $385,524 
Net sales — related parties     20,782      20,782 
   
Total net sales  128,778   236,204   41,324   406,306 
Cost of sales  (97,693)  (207,733)  (34,590)  (340,016)
   
Gross profit  31,085   28,471   6,734   66,290 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (8,157)  (12,751)  (3,958)  (24,866)
Research and development expenses  (1,963)  (1,584)  (490)  (4,037)
Other income (expenses), net  1,907   4,070   (3,078)  2,899 
Gain on partial disposal of subsidiaries        1,838   1,838 
Interest income  5   777   6   788 
Interest expense     (5)  (116)  (121)
   
Income before income taxes and minority interests  22,877   18,978   936   42,791 
Income taxes expense  (29)  (366)  (4)  (399)
   
Income before minority interests and equity in income of affiliated companies  22,848   18,612   932   42,392 
Minority interests     (856)  (211)  (1,067)
Equity in income of affiliated companies     498      498 
   
                 
Income after minority interests and equity in income of affiliated companies $22,848  $18,254  $721  $41,823 
Discontinued operation        1,979   1,979 
   
Net income $22,848  $18,254  $2,700  $43,802 
   

F-33


19. Segment Information — continued

Year ended December 31, 2004

                 
  CECP  TCA  LCDP  Total 
Net sales — third parties $163,584  $287,386  $48,710  $499,680 
Net sales — related parties     34,181      34,181 
   
Total net sales  163,584   321,567   48,710   533,861 
Cost of sales  (130,140)  (287,229)  (40,016)  (457,385)
   
Gross profit  33,444   34,338   8,694   76,476 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (9,222)  (13,619)  (5,212)  (28,053)
Research and development expenses  (2,212)  (1,884)  (949)  (5,045)
Other income (expenses), net  1,698   15,546   39   17,283 
Gain on partial disposal of subsidiaries     77,320      77,320 
Interest income  138   954   18   1,110 
Interest expense  (1)  (23)  (171)  (195)
Unrealised loss on marketable securities     (58,316)     (58,316)
   
Income before income taxes and minority interests  23,845   54,316   2,419   80,580 
Income taxes expense  (405)  (407)  (67)  (879)
   
Income before minority interests and equity in loss of affiliated companies  23,440   53,909   2,352   79,701 
Minority interests  (4,879)  (877)  (254)  (6,010)
Equity in loss of affiliated companies     (6,806)     (6,806)
   
Net income $18,561  $46,226  $2,098  $66,885 
   

Year ended December 31, 2002

                 
  CECP  TCA  LCDP  Total 
Depreciation and amortization $2,982  $5,757  $1,880  $10,619 
Capital expenditures $4,597  $1,365  $12,523  $18,485 
Identifiable assets $77,360  $148,394  $49,332  $275,086 

Year ended December 31, 2003

                 
  CECP  TCA  LCDP  Total 
Depreciation and amortization $4,154  $5,479  $2,631  $12,264 
Capital expenditures $5,243  $11,341  $469  $17,053 
Identifiable assets $85,799  $162,366  $49,530  $297,695 

Year ended December 31, 2004

                 
  CECP  TCA  LCDP  Total 
Depreciation and amortization $4,441  $7,121  $2,454  $14,016 
Capital expenditures $21,493  $14,891  $2,227  $38,611 
Identifiable assets $134,473  $274,664  $51,336  $460,473 

There were no material inter-segment sales for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Property, plant and equipment with a net book value of $312 was transferred from the TCA segment to the LCDP segment during 2002. The Company charges 100% of its corporate level related expenses to its reportable segments as management fees.

F-34


19. Segment Information — continued

A summary sets forth the percentage of net sales of each of the Company’s product lines of each segment for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, is as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
Product line
            
             
CECP:            
- Assembling            
- Consumer electronics and communication products  40%  32%  31%
   
             
TCA:            
- Assembling            
- Telecom components assembly  44%  57%  59%
- Software development services  1%  1%  1%
   
   45%  58%  60%
   
             
LCDP:            
- Parts and components            
- LCD panels  10%  9%  9%
- Transformers  5%  1%  0%
   
   15%  10%  9%
   
   100%  100%  100%
   

A summary of net sales, net income and long-lived assets by geographic areas is as follows:

By geographical area:

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
Net sales from operations within:            
- Hong Kong and Macao:            
Unaffiliated customers $223,709  $295,113  $48,710 
Related party     14,770    
Intercompany sales  979   404   563 
   
   224,688   310,287   49,273 
   
- PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao:            
Unaffiliated customers  4,458   90,411   450,970 
Related parties  7,849   6,012   34,181 
Intercompany sales  179,411   263,971   4,393 
   
   191,718   360,394   489,544 
   
- Intercompany eliminations  (180,390)  (264,375)  (4,956)
   
Total net sales $236,016  $406,306  $533,861 
   
             
Net income within:            
- PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao $17,930  $38,627  $30,981 
- Hong Kong and Macao  2,093   5,175   35,904 
   
Total net income $20,023  $43,802  $66,885 
   

F-35


19. Segment Information — continued

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
Net sales to customers by geographical area:            
- Hong Kong $57,157  $36,433  $160,959 
- Europe (excluding Estonia)  42,943   84,954   96,304 
- United States  33,054   55,543   58,696 
- PRC (excluding Hong Kong)  28,518   101,211   132,603 
- Japan  25,276   68,498   33,880 
- Estonia  19,660   20,474   3,106 
- North America (excluding United States)  6,640   347   5,352 
- Korea  17,390   24,499   21,520 
- Other  5,378   14,347   21,441 
   
Total net sales $236,016  $406,306  $533,861 
   
             
As at December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
Long-lived assets by geographic area:            
- PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao $54,481  $59,399  $84,453 
- Hong Kong and Macao  21,433   18,248   12,988 
   
Total long-lived assets $75,914  $77,647  $97,441 
   

Intercompany sales arise from the transfer of finished goods between subsidiaries operating in different areas. These sales are generally at prices consistent with what the Company would charge third parties for similar goods.

The Company’s sales to customers which accounted for 10% or more of its sales are as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2002  2003  2004 
   
A $N/A  $N/A  $128,623 
B  75,965   100,541   75,426 
C  N/A   N/A   54,635 
D  39,854   46,057   N/A 
E  26,217   N/A   N/A 
F  N/A   43,233   N/A 
   
  $142,036  $189,831  $258,684 
   

F-36


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

   On March 26, 2001, the Company filed a summons seeking to remove the liquidator for failing to act diligently in the performance of his duties and for knowingly misleading the court. On September 3, 2002, the liquidator submitted a letter of resignation prior to the scheduled removal hearing. A new liquidator was subsequently appointed in July 2003.
 NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.
   On July 5, 2002, upon application by the Company, the court ordered the removal of the liquidator’s ex-parte injunction and ordered an inquiry into damages. On August 9, 2002, the court delivered a decision awarding a judgment against Tele-Art for approximately $34,000. On August 12, 2002, the Company redeemed and cancelled, pursuant to its Articles of Association, the remaining 509,181 (**) shares beneficially owned by Tele-Art at a price of $6.14 per share. Including the dividends which the Company had withheld and credited against the judgment, this offset a further $3,519 in judgment debts owed to the Company by Tele-Art. The Company recorded the $3,333 redemption, net of expenses, as other income in 2002.
 
By:/s/ JOSEPH LI
Joseph Li
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 15, 2005   On January 21, 2003, judgment was delivered on the liquidators’ February 4, 1999 summons declaring that the redemption and set off of dividends on the 415,500 shares be set aside and that all Tele-Art property withheld by Nam Tai be delivered to Tele-Art in liquidation. The orders granted in the judgment were substantially different from the relief sought in the February 4, 1999 application. On February 4, 2003, the Company filed an application for a stay of execution and leave to appeal the decision listing eight grounds of appeal, which was granted on June 23, 2003. The case was heard on January 12, 2004 and the judgment was reserved.
   The Company has been advised by its legal representatives that it has real prospects of success on appeal against the January 21, 2003 decision and plans to vigorously fight for such an outcome. However, due to the uncertainty of the final outcome of the litigation as a result of the January 21, 2003 judgment and in accordance with SFAS No. 5,“Accounting for Contingencies”, the Company recorded a provision for $5,192 as a component of accrued expenses as of December 31, 2002, pending a final determination of this matter by the courts, represented the then best estimate of the net monetary expense the Company would have if its appeal was unsuccessful and its two judgment debts in the total amount of $38,000 (including interest, costs, and related expenses) was determined as having the lowest priorities in recovering from the estate of Tele-Art. According to the latest information provided by the liquidator on November 7, 2003, apart from Nam Tai, a total of 4 other creditors of Tele-Art, including the Bank of China, submitted their proof of debt to the liquidator for a total claim of approximately $3,390. Together with the outstanding legal charge as of December 31, 2003, the total potential obligation to the Company was estimated to be approximately $3,890, and accordingly, the 2002 provision for $5,192 had been reduced to $3,890 in the fourth quarter of 2003. If the appeal is successful and all legal matters related to Tele-Art, Inc. are finalized, including the final determination of other creditors’ position, then any remaining portion of the $3,890 provision will be reversed into income in the related period.
(**: Subsequent to November 7, 2003, the number of shares has been adjusted to 560,099 to reflect the 10 for 1 stock dividend effect.)

F-31


19.Commitments and Contingencies - continued

(b)Significant legal proceedings - continued
If the appeal is not successful, and the 1,017,149 (adjusted for 10 for 1 stock dividend effect) share redemption is set aside, the Company believe that these shares would be sold by Tele-Art’s liquidator in the open market at the market price prevailing at the time of sale. For example, if these shares had been sold at the March 1, 2004 closing price of $28.09 per share, the proceeds the liquidator would have realized before commissions, plus withheld dividends of $518, would have been approximately $29,090 for the estate of Tele-Art. Accordingly, if the Company is not successful on its appeal of the January 21, 2003 judgment, Nam Tai will seek to recover its $38,000 in judgment debts from the estate of Tele-Art and any amounts recovered therein would be recognized as other income.
However, there is no assurance that the Company may realize the entire amount of its judgment debts as Tele-Art is in liquidation. The actual amount of the recovery, if any, is uncertain, and is dependent on a number of factors including the value of Nam Tai’s shares when sold in the market, and the final determination of other creditors’ positions. The Company plans to continue to pursue vigorously all legal alternatives available to recover the maximum amount of the outstanding debt from Tele-Art as well as pursue other parties that may have assisted in any transfers of the assets from Tele-Art. The Company may incur substantial additional costs in pursuing the recovery and such costs may not be recoverable.
Class Actions
On March 11, 2003, the Company were served with a complaint in an action captioned Michael Rocco v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 1148 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Rocco Action. In addition to Nam Tai, certain directors are named as defendants. On or about April 9, 2003, a second complaint was filed in an action captioned A.J. & Celine Steigler v. Nam Tai, et al., 03 Civ. 2462 (S.D.N.Y.), or the Steigler Action, and together with the Rocco Action, the Actions. The Actions have been consolidated since July 2003 and purports to represent a putative class of persons who purchased the common stock of Nam Tai from July 29, 2002 through February 18, 2003. Plaintiffs in the Actions assert claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and allege that misrepresentations and/or omissions were made during the alleged class periods concerning the recovery of an inventory write-down and a charge to goodwill related to Nam Tai’s LPT segment. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit and the putative class action has not been certified as a class action by the court. In any event, the Company’s motion to dismiss was heard in November 2003 and are awaiting the judgment of the court thereof. Nam Tai believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend the case vigorously.

F-32


20.Segment Information

The Company operates in two segments: CEP and LPT, principally relating to the operation of J.I.C. Group. The Company operates and manages these segments as strategic business units. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the net income of each segment in assessing performance and allocating resources between segments.
The following table provides operating financial information for the two reportable segments.

                                     
  Year ended December 31,
  
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
  CEP LPT Total CEP LPT Total CEP LPT Total
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales - third parties $176,976  $35,958  $212,934  $192,906  $35,261  $228,167  $344,200  $41,324  $385,524 
Net sales - related party  21,072      21,072   7,849      7,849   20,782      20,782 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Total net sales  198,048   35,958   234,006   200,755   35,261   236,016   364,982   41,324   406,306 
Cost of sales  (174,863)  (29,111)  (203,974)  (167,440)  (30,516)  (197,956)  (305,426)  (34,590)  (340,016)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Gross profit  23,185   6,847   30,032   33,315   4,745   38,060   59,556   6,734   66,290 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  (16,521)  (5,453)  (21,974)  (14,940)  (3,043)  (17,983)  (20,908)  (3,958)  (24,866)
Research and development expenses  (2,746)  (208)  (2,954)  (2,162)  (524)  (2,686)  (3,547)  (490)  (4,037)
Impairment of goodwill           (339)     (339)         
Interest expense  (170)  (8)  (178)  (705)  (85)  (790)  (5)  (116)  (121)
Equity in income of affiliated companies  1,867      1,867   10,741      10,741   498      498 
Other income (expenses), net  885   1,824   2,709   (4,879)  (1,164)  (6,043)  6,759   (1,234)  5,525 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interests  6,500   3,002   9,502   21,031   (71)  20,960   42,353   936   43,289 
Income (loss) taxes expense  (137)  (90)  (227)  (710)  (63)  (773)  (395)  (4)  (399)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income before minority interests  6,363   2,912   9,275   20,321   (134)  20,187   41,958   932   42,890 
Minority interests  (230)     (230)  (107)  (57)  (164)  (856)  (211)  (1,067)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Income after minority interests  6,133   2,912   9,045   20,214   (191)  20,023   41,102   721   41,823 
Discontinued operation                       1,979   1,979 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Net income (loss) $6,133  $2,912  $9,045  $20,214  $(191) $20,023  $41,102  $2,700  $43,802 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
                                     
  Year ended December 31,
  
  2001 2002 2003
  
 
 
  CEP LPT Total CEP LPT Total CEP LPT Total
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization $8,454  $2,717  $11,171  $8,739  $1,880  $10,619  $9,633  $2,631  $12,264 
Stock option costs     839   839                   
Capital expenditures  34,060   1,953   36,013   5,962   12,523   18,485   16,584   469   17,053 
Identifiable assets $188,262  $36,311  $224,573  $225,754  $49,332  $275,086  $248,165  $49,530  $297,695 

There were no material inter-segment sales for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. Property, plant and equipment with a net book value of $312 was transferred from the CEP segment to the LPT segment during 2002. The Company charges 100% of its corporate level related expenses to its reportable segments as management fees.
A summary sets forth the percentage of net sales of each of the Company’s product lines of each segment for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, is as follows:

               
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Product line
            
CEP:            
 - Assembling            
  - LCD consumer products  32%  40%  31%
  - Telecom components assembly  52%  44%  58%
  - Software development services  1%  1%  1%
   
   
   
 
   85%  85%  90%
   
   
   
 
LPT:            
 - Parts and components
  - - LCD panels  11%  10%  9%
  - Transformers  4%  5%  1%
   
   
   
 
   15%  15%  10%
   
   
   
 
   100%  100%  100%
   
   
   
 

F-33


20.Segment Information - continued
A summary of net sales, net income and long-lived assets by geographic areas is as follows:
By geographical area:

               
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Net sales from operations within:            
 - Hong Kong and Macao:            
  Unaffiliated customers $206,902  $223,709  $295,113 
  Related party        14,770 
  Intercompany sales     979   404 
   
   
   
 
   206,902   224,688   310,287 
   
   
   
 
 - PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao:            
  Unaffiliated customers  6,032   4,458   90,411 
  Related party  21,072   7,849   6,012 
  Intercompany sales  160,503   179,411   263,971 
   
   
   
 
   187,607   191,718   360,394 
   
   
   
 
 - Intercompany eliminations  (160,503)  (180,390)  (264,375)
   
   
   
 
Total net sales $234,006  $236,016  $406,306 
   
   
   
 
Net income within:            
 - PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao $4,848  $17,930  $38,627 
 - Hong Kong and Macao  4,197   2,093   5,175 
   
   
   
 
Total net income $9,045  $20,023  $43,802 
   
   
   
 
              
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Net sales to customers by geographical area:            
 - Hong Kong $64,391  $57,157  $36,433 
 - Europe (excluding Estonia)  22,437   42,943   84,954 
 - United States  35,662   33,054   55,543 
 - PRC (excluding Hong Kong)  25,378   28,518   101,211 
 - Japan  22,767   25,276   68,498 
 - Estonia     19,660   20,474 
 - North America (excluding United States)  19,332   6,640   347 
 - Korea  23,986   17,390   24,499 
 - Other  20,053   5,378   14,347 
   
   
   
 
Total net sales $234,006  $236,016  $406,306 
   
   
   
 
              
As of December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
Long-lived assets by geographic area:            
 - PRC, excluding Hong Kong and Macao $43,299  $54,481  $59,399 
 - Hong Kong and Macao  27,115   21,433   18,248 
   
   
   
 
Total long-lived assets $70,414  $75,914  $77,647 
   
   
   
 

Intercompany sales arise from the transfer of finished goods between subsidiaries operating in different areas. These sales are generally at estimated market price.

F-34


20.Segment Information - continued
The Company’s sales to customers which accounted for 10% or more of its sales are as follows:

             
Year ended December 31, 2001 2002 2003

 
 
 
A $69,996  $75,965  $100,541 
B  N/A   39,854   46,057 
C  33,143   26,217   N/A 
D  N/A   N/A   43,233 
   
   
   
 
  $103,139  $142,036  $189,831 
   
   
   
 

21.Subsequent Events
In December 2003, the Company paid approximately $5,277 (Euros 4,250) into an escrow account for an investment in Stepmind, which was included in prepayment and other receivables at December 31, 2003. Approximately $2,642 (Euros 2,122) has been released from the escrow amount in January 2004 for the Company’s first phase of investment. The second phase of investment amounting to $2,646 (Euros 2,132) will be released by the Company to Stepmind in August 2004, subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. Upon successful subscription of the shares in the second phase, the Company’s total investment will represent 11.33% equity interest in Stepmind.

F-35


EXHIBIT INDEX

Item 19Exhibits.

     The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report:

   
Exhibit  
Number DESCRIPTION


1.1 Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended on June 26, 2003.*
   
4.1Sale and Purchase Agreement dated April 24, 2002 between A&T Battery Corporation, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and Toshiba Battery Co., Ltd.*
4.2Subscription Agreement dated September 6, 2002 between TCL International Holdings Ltd. and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. for the purchase of Convertible Notes of TCL International Holdings. *
4.3Agreement on Proposal for the listing of J.I.C. Group common shares on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange dated January 14, 2002 among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, Albatronics (Far East) Company Limited (in liquidation) and Messrs. Toohey and Chung, the Joint Liquidators (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of registrant’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the SEC on March 18, 2002).**
4.4Banking Facility Letter, as amended, dated March 27, 2002 between Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. and J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Ltd. for a four-year term loan of $4,500,000. *
4.5Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on March 20, 2002 for the production of Camera August for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.
4.6Share Transfer Agreement of TCL Holdings dated January 25, 2002 between Hui Zhou City Investment Holdings Co., Ltd and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. *
4.7Agreement entered into between Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited on September 15, 2003 for the production of CMOS sensor modules for Sony Computer Entertainment Europe and its nominated distributors.
4.8Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company on September 9, 2003 for the production of flash for cellular phones for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.
4.9 Purchase Agreement entered into between Citigroup Global Markets Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on August 22, 2003 for the sale of 3% convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd. at an aggregate price of HK$39,555,068.49 (approximately $5.03 million).*
   
4.10Agreement entered into between Omnivision Technologies, Inc. and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on July 15, 2003 for supplying CMOS sensor to Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.
4.114.2 Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and Glory Gate Enterprises Limited on June 28, 2003 for the disposal of transformers operation to Glory Gate Enterprises Limited for approximately $2.4 million.*
   
4.124.3 Equity Interest Transfer Agreement Amendment entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications ABNam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited HK and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on June 26, 2003 for amending the agreements entered on March 20, 2002 and January 10,Limited July 3, 2003.
   
4.13Sale and Purchase Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on March 10, 2003 for the sale of COG panels to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.

68


4.14Sale and Purchase Agreement entered into between Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited and J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited on March 10, 2003 for the sale of LCD panels, ACFs and ICs to Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.
4.15Agreement entered into among Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd., Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on January 27, 2003 for the production of LCD modules for Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd.
4.16Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on January 10, 2003 for the production of Camera Filip for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
4.17Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on January 10, 2003 for the production of Camera August Cl for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
4.18Basic Agreement entered into between JCT Wireless Technology Ltd. and Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited on January 8, 2003 for supplying various products, including mother boards, LCD modules, FPC and RF modules, to JCT Wireless Technology Ltd.
4.19Basic Agreement entered into between Optrex Corporation and Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited on January 1, 2003 for the manufacturing of LCD modules for cellular phone.
4.20Subscription Agreement dated January 6, 2003 between Alpha Star Investments Ltd and the Company for the purchase of 1,625,000 ordinary shares.**
4.21Shareholders Agreement dated January 8, 2003 among Alpha Star Investments and its investors, including the Company.**
4.22Basic Agreement and two memorandums entered into between Wuxi Sharp Electronic Component Co. Ltd. and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on September 8, 2003 for the manufacturing of PCBs for Wuxi Sharp Electronic Component Co. Ltd.
4.24Agreement entered into between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. on September 15, 2003 for the production of CMOS sensors modules for Sony Computer Entertainment Europe and its nominated distributors.
4.25Specific Service Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Namtai Electronic (Shenzen) Company Ltd. on September 19, 2003 for the manufacturing of Bluetooth headset for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
4.264.4 Construction Agreement, with commencement date of September 23, 2003, entered into between Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and Takasago Thermal Engineering (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. on October 28, 2003 for the construction of new factory premises.*
   
4.274.5 An Investment Agreement and Shareholders Agreement entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on December 9, 2003 for acquiring an 11.33% equity interest in Stepmind with a consideration of approximately $5.3 million.*

69


   
4.284.6 A Supplemental Agreement was entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on January 2, 2004 for consenting to the release of the second phase of payment and increasing capital investment in Stepmind should Stepmind fulfill certain conditions.*
   
4.294.7Land Title Rights Issued by Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Planning and Land Resources February 16, 2004.
4.8 An Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Group Management limited and Frontier Profit Inc. on March 10, 2004 for selling Flat A, 22nd Floor, Tower 2 and Car Parking Space No. A86, The Leighton Hill, 28 Broadwood Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong to Frontier Profit Inc.*
   
4.9A Memorandum of Understanding signed by Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) on March 26, 2004 to confirm the respective rights and liabilities of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited (Hong Kong) and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. under an internal restructuring.
4.10A Sale and Purchaser Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Mr. Wong Toe Yeung on March 31, 2004 regarding purchasing the entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace Limited from Mr. Wong Toe Yeung with the consideration of disposal 72.2% interest in Mate Fair Group Limited, cash of $25 million and 2,389,974 shares issued by Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.
4.11A Trademark License Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited on April 8, 2004 for the use of certain “Namtai” trademarks.
4.12A Deed of Indemnity entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited on April 15, 2004 in favour of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited regarding the Global Offering of 200,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.
4.13An Underwriting Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. as the selling shareholders and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, BNP Paribas Peregrine Capital Limited, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, Cazenove Asia Limited, BDS Asia Capital Limited and VC CEF Capital Limited as public offer underwriters on April 15, 2004 regarding the public offering of 20,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.
4.14A Supplemental Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, and Mr. Wong Toe Yeung on July 27, 2004 to adjust the consideration for purchasing the entire issued share capital of Jasper Ace Limited by canceling 973,210 common shares of Nam Tai Electronics, Inc, issued to Top Scale Company Limited on April 21, 2004.
4.15An Underwriting Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. as the selling shareholders and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, BNP Paribas Peregrine Capital Limited, Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited, Cazenove Asia Limited, BDS Asia Capital Limited and VC CEF Capital Limited as international placement underwriters on April 22, 2004 regarding the international placing of 180,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.
4.16A Pricing Determination Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited on April 22, 2004 for determining the offering price of the shares of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited to be HK$3.88 per share.
4.17A Stock Borrowing Agreement entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited on April 22, 2004 regarding the Global Offering of 200,000,000 shares of HK$0.01 each of Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited.

4.18Amended 2001 Option Plan July 30, 2004
4.19An Accession Agreement entered into between Welcome Success Technology Ltd. and Mr. Alain Jolivet on August 4, 2004 in relation to the transfer of entire interest in Stepmind to Remote Reward SAS and who became a party to the Shareholders Agreement which entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., AGF Innovation 3, AGF Innovation 4, AGF Innovation 5, Mighty Wealth Group Limited, Remote Reward SAS, Mr. Alain Jolivet and Mr. Andre Jolivet executed on November 278, 2003, December 9, 2003 and December 10, 2003.
4.20An Escrow Agreement entered into among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., Welcome Success Technology Limited, Remote Reward SAS, Johnson Stokes & Master, Mr. Andre Jolivet and Mr. Alain Jolivet on August 18, 2004 in relation to the disposal of 1,457,720 shares in Stepmind to Remote Reward SAS with a consideration of Euros 4,253,301.98.
4.21A subscription Agreement entered into among TCL Industries Holdings (HK) Limited, TCL International holdings Limited, Cheerful Asset Investments Limited, Jasper Ace Limited, Mate Fair Group Limited, and TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited on August 19, 2004 for subscribing 254,474,910 shares in TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited in a consideration of RMB131,283,020.
4.22A Deed of Assignment of Trademarks entered into between Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. on September 20, 2004 for assigning “Namtai & device” trademarks to Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.
4.23A Banking Facilities Letter from the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited to Nam Tai Group Management Limited on September 24, 2004 regarding the renewal of Overdraft Facility of HK$500,000, Treasury Facilities of US$30,000,000 and Corporate Card of HK$1,100,000.
4.24A Share Transfer Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited and J.I.C. Technology Company Limited on October 15, 2004 for the disposal of the entire issued share capital of Jetup Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited for a consideration of HK$105,878,396.
   
8.1 Diagram of Company’s subsidiaries. See Page 2624 of this Report.report.
10.1Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 10, 2003. **
   
10.2 Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 10, 2003. *
10.3Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 17, 2003. ***
   
12.1 Certification pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
12.2 Certification pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
14.1 Code of Ethics.
   
23.1 Consent of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
   
99.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
99.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the.the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*Previously filed with the registrant’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 10, 2004.
** Previously filed with the registrant’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on February 28, 2003.
**Previously filed with the registrant’s Amended Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 11, 2003.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

NAM TAI ELECTRONICS, INC.
By:/s/ JOSEPH LI

Joseph Li
Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 10, 2004

70


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
NumberDESCRIPTION


1.1Memorandum and Articles of Association, as amended on June 26, 2003.
4.1Sale and Purchase Agreement dated April 24, 2002 between A&T Battery Corporation, Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Limited and Toshiba Battery Co., Ltd.*
4.2Subscription Agreement dated September 6, 2002 between TCL International Holdings Ltd. and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. for the purchase of Convertible Notes of TCL International Holdings. *
4.3Agreement on Proposal for the listing of J.I.C. Group common shares on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange dated January 14, 2002 among Nam Tai Electronics, Inc., J.I.C. Technology Company Limited, Albatronics (Far East) Company Limited (in liquidation) and Messrs. Toohey and Chung, the Joint Liquidators (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of registrant’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the SEC on March 18, 2002).**
4.4Banking Facility Letter, as amended, dated March 27, 2002 between Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. and J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Ltd. for a four-year term loan of $4,500,000. *
4.5Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on March 20, 2002 for the production of Camera August for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.
4.6Share Transfer Agreement of TCL Holdings dated January 25, 2002 between Hui Zhou City Investment Holdings Co., Ltd and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. *
4.7Agreement entered into between Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited on September 15, 2003 for the production of CMOS sensor, modules for Sony Computer Entertainment Europe and its nominated distributors.
4.8Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company on September 9, 2003 for the production of flash for cellular phones for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB.
4.9Purchase Agreement entered into between Citigroup Global Markets Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on August 22, 2003 for the sale of 3% convertible notes of TCL International Holdings Ltd. at an aggregate price of HK$39,555,068.49 (approximately $5.03 million).
4.10Agreement entered into between Omnivision Technologies, Inc. and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on July 15, 2003 for supplying CMOS sensor to Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.
4.11Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Technology Company Limited and Glory Gate Enterprises Limited on June 28, 2003 for the disposal of transformer operations to Glory Gate Enterprises Limited for approximately $2.4 million.
4.12Agreement Amendment entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on June 26, 2003 for amending the agreements entered on March 20, 2002 and January 10, 2003.
4.13Sale and Purchase Agreement entered into between J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on March 10, 2003 for the sale of COG panels to J.I.C. Technology Company Limited.

71


4.14Sale and Purchase Agreement entered into between Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited and J.I.C. Enterprises (Hong Kong) Limited on March 10, 2003 for the sale of LCD panels, ACFs and ICs to Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited.
4.15Agreement entered into among Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd., Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on January 27, 2003 for the production of LCD modules for Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co. Ltd.
4.16Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on January 10, 2003 for the production of Camera Filip for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
4.17Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Ltd. on January 10, 2003 for the production of Camera August Cl for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
4.18Basic Agreement entered into between JCT Wireless Technology Ltd. and Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited on January 8, 2003 for supplying various products, including mother boards, LCD modules, FPC and RF modules, to JCT Wireless Technology Ltd.
4.19Basic Agreement entered into between Optrex Corporation and Nam Tai Telecom (Hong Kong) Company Limited on January 1, 2003 for the manufacturing of LCD modules for cellular phone.
4.20Subscription Agreement dated January 6, 2003 between Alpha Star Investments Ltd and the Company for the purchase of 1,625,000 ordinary shares.**
4.21Shareholders Agreement dated January 8, 2003 among Alpha Star Investments and its investors, including the Company.**
4.22Basic Agreement and two memorandums entered into between Wuxi Sharp Electronic Component Co. Ltd. and Zastron Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Limited on September 8, 2003 for the manufacturing of PCBs for Wuxi Sharp Electronic Component Co. Ltd.
4.24Agreement entered into between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. on September 15, 2003 for the production of CMOS sensors modules for Sony Computer Entertainment Europe and its nominated distributors.
4.25Specific Service Agreement entered into between Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB and Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Company Ltd. on September 19, 2003 for the manufacturing of Bluetooth headset for Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication AB.
4.26Construction Agreement, with commencement date of September 23, 2003, entered into between Namtai Electronic (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. and Takasago Thermal Engineering (Hong Kong) Co. Ltd. on October 28, 2003 for the construction of new factory premises.
4.27An Investment Agreement and Shareholders Agreement entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on December 9, 2003 for acquiring an 11.33% equity interest in Stepmind with a consideration of approximately $5.3 million.

72


4.28A Supplemental Agreement was entered into among Mr. André Jolivet, Mr. Alain Jolivet, Remote Reward SAS, AGF Private Equity, Mighty Wealth Group Limited and Nam Tai Electronics, Inc. on January 2, 2004 for consenting the release of the second phase of payment and increasing capital investment in Stepmind should Stepmind fulfill certain conditions.
4.29An Agreement was entered into between Nam Tai Group Management limited and Frontier Profit Inc. on March 10, 2004 for selling Flat A, 22nd  Floor, Tower 2 and Car Parking Space No. A86, The Leighton Hill, 28 Broadwood Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong to Frontier Profit Inc.
8.1Diagram of Company’s subsidiaries. See Page 26 of this Report.
10.2Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 10, 2003. *
10.3Letter from MCW. Todman & Co. dated February 17, 2003. *
12.1Certification pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
12.2Certification pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
14.1Code of Ethics.
23.1Consent of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
99.1Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.2Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


†*Previously filed with the registrant’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on February 28, 2003.
**Previously filed with the registrant’s Amended Form 20-F filed with the SEC on June 11, 2003.

73